Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)2)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 (Mark

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142023

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___to _____

Commission file number 001-34785

XWELL, INC.

VRINGO, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
20-4988129

Delaware

20-4988129

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

780 Third Avenue, 12254 West 31st Street11th Floor

New York, NY

10017

10001

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 309-7549 (212)-750-9595

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC

Warrants to purchase Common StockThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer, ", "accelerated” “accelerated filer," and "smaller” “smaller reporting company,"” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):Act.

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

x

Non-accelerated filer

[Do not check if a smaller reporting company]

¨

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate), as of June 30, 2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was $16,663,729 computed by reference to the closing sale price of such shares$4.00 per share on The NASDAQthe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC on June 30, 2014 was $290,632,195.

2023.

As of April 17, 2015, 93,571,04229, 2024, 4,183,435 shares of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock wereare outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None

Auditor Name:

Marcum LLP

Auditor Location:

East Hanover, New Jersey

Auditor Firm ID:

688

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Explanatory Note

2

Explanatory Note

3

Forward-Looking Statements

3

Forward-Looking Statements

3

PART III

PART III

Item 10:

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

4

Item 11:

Executive Compensation

9

11

Item 12:

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

22

17

Item 13:

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

24

19

Item 14:

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

25

20

PART IV

Item 15:

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

26

21

Signature Page

27

22

1

Table of Contents

Explanatory Note

This Amendment No. 12 on Form 10-K/A (this “Form 10-K/A”) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vringo,XWELL, Inc. (“Vringo”XWELL” or the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2023 as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on MarchApril 16, 2015 (the2024, as amended on April 17, 2024 (collectively the “Original Filing”). This Form 10-K/A amends the Original Filing to include the information required by Part III of the Original Filing because the Company has not filed and will not file a definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of its 20142023 fiscal year. In addition, this Form 10-K/A amends Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing to include new certifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

 

Except for the foregoing, we have not modified or updated disclosures presented in the Original Filing in this Form 10-K/A. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A does not modify or update the disclosures in the Original Filing to reflect subsequent events, results or developments or facts that have become known to us after the date of the Original Filing. Information not affected by this amendmentForm 10-K/A remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time the Original Filing was filed. Therefore, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with any documents incorporated by reference therein and our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the Original Filing.

 

2

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K/A contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on management’s expectations and are subject to certain factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, outcome of events, timing and performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect our business, particularly those mentioned in the Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Original Filing and in our periodic reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or to any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.

All references in this Form 10-K/A to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Vringo,XWELL, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise.

3

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Our Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) currently consists of seven (7)five (5) members. Prior to each annual meeting of stockholders, the Board of Directors considers the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and votes to nominate individuals for election or re-election for a term of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualify or until their earlier death, resignation, or removal. Election takes place at our annual meeting of stockholders.

Set forth below are the names of our directors and executive officers, their ages (as of the filing date of this Form 10-K/A), their position(s) with the Company, if any, their principal occupations or employment for at least the past five years, the length of their tenure as directors and the names of other public companies in which such persons hold or have held directorships during the past five years. Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers. Additionally, information about the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to our Board of Directors’ conclusion that each person listed below as a director should serve as a director is set forth below:

Name

Age

Name

Age

Position(s) with the Company

Andrew D. Perlman

Bruce T. Bernstein*(1)(2)(3)(4)

37

60

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Robert Weinstein*(1)(2)(3)(4)

64

Director

Michael Lebowitz* (3)(4)

51

Director

Gaëlle Wizenberg*(1)(2)(5)

49

Director

Scott R. Milford

59

Chief Executive Officer and Director

Andrew Kennedy Lang

Suzanne A. Scrabis

48

54

Chief Technology Officer, President and Director
Anastasia Nyrkovskaya38

Chief Financial Officer

David L. Cohen, Esq.

Ezra T. Ernst

44

55

Executive Vice President of XWELL, Chief LegalExecutive Officer of XpresTest, Inc. and Intellectual PropertyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

H. Van Sinclair*(2)(3)62Lead Independent Director
John Engelman*(1)59Director
Ashley C. Keller*(2)(3)(4)36Director
Noel J. Spiegel*(1)(2)67Director
Donald E. Stout*(1)(5)68Director of Hyperpointe

*Independent director under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”)

*Independent director. 
(1)Current member of Compensation Committee. Committee
(2)Current member of Audit Committee. Committee
(3)Current member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Committee
(4)Mr. Keller served asCurrent member of Strategic Affairs Committee
(5)On December 15, 2023, the Board of Directors elected Gaëlle Wizenberg to be a member of the Compensation Committee throughBoard of Directors, effective as of January 15, 2015.
(5)Mr. Stout joined the Compensation Committee on January 15, 2015.1, 2024

Our Board of Directors has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with us, either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board of Directors has determined that the following members of our Board of Directors are “independent directors” as defined by NasdaqBruce T. Bernstein, Gaelle Wizenberg, Robert Weinstein, and Michael Lebowitz.

Andrew D. PerlmanBruce T. Bernstein joined our Board of Directors in February 2016 and has served as our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) since March 2012, as our President from April 2010 to July 2012 and as a memberthe Chairman of our Board of Directors since September 2009. From February 2009 to March 2010,2018. Mr. PerlmanBernstein has over thirty years of experience in the securities industry, primarily as senior portfolio manager for two alternative finance funds as well as in trading and structuring of arbitrage strategies. Mr. Bernstein has served as President of Rockmore Capital, LLC since 2006, the manager of a direct investment and lending fund with peak assets under management of $140 million. Previously, he served as Co-President of Omicron Capital, LP, an investment firm based in New York, which he joined in 2001. Omicron Capital focused on direct investing and lending to public small cap companies and had peak assets under management of $260 million. Prior to joining Omicron Capital, Mr. Bernstein served as Senior Vice President in the bank’s Global Securities Arbitrage business unit of Global Digital Business Development at EMI Music Group (“EMI”)Fortis Investments, Inc., where he was responsible for leading distribution deals with digital partners for EMI’s musicspecializing in equity structured products and video content. From May 2007 to February 2009, Mr. Perlman wasequity arbitrage and then President in charge of the General Manager

4

Table of our operationsContents

bank’s proprietary investment business in the United StatesStates. Prior to Fortis Investments, Mr. Bernstein was Director in the Equity Derivatives Group at Nomura Securities International specializing in cross-border tax arbitrage, domestic equity arbitrage and also served as our Senior Vice President Content & Community, in which he led our content and social community partnerships. From June 2005 to May 2007,structured equity swaps. Mr. Perlman was Senior Vice President of Digital MediaBernstein started his career at Classic Media, Inc. (“Classic Media”), a global media company with a portfolio of kids, family and pop-culture entertainment brands. In his position with Classic Media, Mr. Perlman led the company’s partnerships across video gaming, online and mobile distribution. From June 2001 to May 2005, Mr. Perlman served as General Manager for the Rights Group, LLC and its predecessors, a mobile content, marketing and mobile fan club company,Kidder Peabody, where he oversaw mobile marketing campaigns for major international brands suchrose to the level of Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Bernstein also serves as Visa and Pepsi, and such artists as Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake.a member of the Board of Directors of Synaptogenix, Inc.  (formerly Neurotrope Bioscience, Inc.), Mr. PerlmanBernstein is also a member of the board of Summit Digital Health, a laser-based blood glucose monitor distributor, based in New Jersey. Mr. Bernstein holds a BachelorB.B.A. from City University of Arts (“B.A.”) in Business Administration from the School of Business and Public Management at The George Washington University.

New York (Baruch).

We believe Mr. Perlman’s priorBernstein’s extensive experience in licensing intellectual propertythe securities industry qualifies him to serve as the
Chairman of our Board of Directors.

Robert Weinstein joined our Board of Directors in February 2020. Mr. Weinstein has extensive accounting and deal structuringfinance experience, spanning more than thirty years, as a public accountant, investment banker, healthcare private equity fund principal and chief financial officer. Since October 2013, Mr. Weinstein has been the Chief Financial Officer of Synaptogenix, Inc. (formerly Neurotrope Bioscience, Inc.), a publicly-traded biotechnology company. From September 2011 to September 2013, Mr. Weinstein was an independent consultant for several healthcare companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. From March 2010 to August 2011, Mr. Weinstein was the Chief Financial Officer of Green Energy Management Services Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded energy consulting company. From August 2007 to February 2010, Mr. Weinstein served as Chief Financial Officer of Xcorporeal, Inc., a publicly-traded, development-stage medical device company which was sold in March 2010 to Fresenius Medical USA, the largest provider of dialysis equipment and services worldwide. Mr. Weinstein received his MBA degree in finance and international business from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive), and received his B.S. in accounting from the State University of New York at Albany.

We believe Mr. Weinstein’s extensive financial expertise and healthcare experience qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. His additional experienceDirectors and insights gained overas a member and the past five years at Vringo are a significant contribution tochairperson of the Company and theaudit committee of our Board of Directors.

Michael Lebowitz joined our Board of Directors in April 2020. An expert in customer experience strategy and innovation, Mr. Lebowitz has a twenty-five year track record in defining creative strategy and vision for some of the world’s most recognizable brands. Mr. Lebowitz founded Big Spaceship, a globally-recognized creative consultancy, in 2000 and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Big Spaceship since its founding. Mr. Lebowitz received his Bachelor’s degree in Film from Vassar College.

Andrew Kennedy LangWe believe Mr. Lebowitz’s extensive experience in the area of creative brand strategy qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Gaëlle Wizenberg joined our Board of Directors in January 2024. An expert in luxury consumer packaged goods and serial entrepreneur, Ms. Wizenberg founded Objects of Magic LLC, a wellness brand offering team building and office retreats, in August 2022 and has served as CEO since the founding of the company. Prior to this, she founded Charlie Banana Consulting, LLC in July 2019 and served as Director and CEO from July 2019 to March 2024. Additionally, she founded Charlie Banana USA, LLC, a luxury brand of eco-friendly baby products, in 2013 and has served as CEO until 2020 when it was acquired by Proctor & Gamble. Before that, Ms. Wizenberg founded Winc Design Limited, a global cloth diaper manufacturer in 2007 and has served as CEO until 2020. We believe Ms. Wizenberg’s entrepreneurial experience with consumer and wellness brands qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors.

Scott R. Milford joined the Company in July 2019 andhas served as our President, Chief TechnologyExecutive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since JulyJanuary 19, 2012, and2022. Prior to January 2022, Mr. Milford served as President, CEO,our Chief TechnologyOperating Officer since December 2020.  Prior to that, he served as our first Chief People Officer since July 2019.  Mr. Milford has over 30 years of experience at high profile and a director of Innovate/Protectdiverse organizations. Prior to joining XWELL, he served as VP, People Operations at SoulCycle from June 22, 2011January to July 19, 2012. Mr. Lang has been2019, where he led the creation and deployment of that company’s talent acquisition strategy, the development of an inventorannual performance cycle, and entrepreneur for over two decades. Mr. Lang founded WiseWire Corporationcreated and deployed the “people strategy” that supported the opening of the brand’s first European studio in 1995London. This included the development of talent acquisition and sold ittalent management plans, compensation design and all policies and procedures governing studio operations. Prior to Lycos in 1998 for $39.75 million. Hethat, he served as the Chief TechnologyPeople Officer of Lycos prior to its sale to Terra Networks in 2000 for $5.4 billion. Thereafter, Mr. Lang served from 2001 to 2006 as CEO of Lightspace Corporation, an active gaming technology company. Mr. Lang isBayada, a graduate of Duke University$1 billion Home Health Care Company, during 2018, where he finished secondplayed a

5

Table of Contents

significant role in his classbuilding the organizational infrastructure necessary to scale the business from 400 service offices to 1,000 offices. Previously, he was Senior Vice President – Human Resources for Le Pain Quotidien from 2016 to 2018, where he was responsible for driving operational excellence through strategic HR planning, building organizational and holds Bachelor’s degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Mathematics,employee capabilities, facilitating change, and Physics. Mr. Lang holdsbuilding effective working relationships with employees and guests on a Master’s degree in Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon University.

global scale. His other relevant experience includes senior leadership positions at Town Sports International, Starbucks Coffee Company, Universal Music Group, Viacom, and Blockbuster Entertainment.

We believe Mr. Lang’sMilford’s extensive experience gainedin the retail industry and his knowledge of the Company’s business due to his status as founderan executive officer of WiseWire Corporation, and CEO of Innovate/Protect and Lightspace Corporationthe Company qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Executive Officers

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya joined the Company in May 2013 as our Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Nyrkovskaya oversees all aspects of the finance and accounting functions, including: SEC and internal financial reporting, budgeting and forecasting, tax planning and reporting, human resources, and operational matters. Prior to joining the Company, from 2006, Ms. Nyrkovskaya served as Vice President and Assistant Global Controller and Vice President, Corporate Finance and Business Development at NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBCUniversal Media”). She was responsible for technical accounting areas, policies and internal controls. She also structured merger and acquisition transactions, partnerships, joint ventures and dispositions as well as debt activities, and restructurings. From 1998 to 2006, Ms. Nyrkovskaya served in the Audit and Assurance practice at KPMG LLP. Ms. Nyrkovskaya is a Certified Public Accountant and received an advanced degree in economics and business administration from Moscow State University of Publishing and Printing Arts.

David L. Cohen, Esq. Suzanne A. Scrabishas served as our SecretaryChief Financial Officer of the Company since January 15, 2015, Chief Legal and Intellectual Property Officer since May 7, 2013, as our Head of Litigation, Licensing and Intellectual Property from July 19, 2012 to May 7, 2013, and as Innovate/Protect’s Special Counsel from May 20, 20122023. Prior to July 19, 2012. Mr. Cohen oversees2023, Ms. Scrabis served as the Company’s world-wide effortsProgram Manager, Technology Platforms for Rockwell Automation in intellectual property development and monetization.2020, after serving as Chief Financial Officer for MAVERICK Technologies Holdings, LLC, a privately held independent systems integrator based in Columbia, Illinois from 2006 to 2019. As CFO, she helped lead the acquisition of Maverick Technologies by Rockwell Automation based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Before that, she served as the Director of Operations at MAVERICK from 2003 to 2006. Ms. Scrabis also served from 2001 to 2003 as the Director of Logistics for Aurora Foods, a packaged foods manufacturing company that was subsequently acquired by Pinnacle Foods in 2004. Prior to joining Vringo, Mr. Cohen was Senior Litigation Counselthat she served at Nokia, where among his other duties, he oversaw manyErnst & Young as a senior asset manager for the Pacific and New York Metro regions from 1996-2001. Ms. Scrabis holds a Bachelor of Nokia’s litigations. Mr. Cohen Science in Operations Management and Marketing from California State University Long Beach.

Ezra T. Ernst has also worked in private practice at Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP from 2004 to 2007 and at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP from 2000 to 2004. Before practicing law, Mr. Cohen earned a B.A. and a Master of Arts (“M.A.”) from the Johns Hopkins University in the history of science and history; a Master of Philosophy in the history and philosophy of science from Cambridge University, an M.A. (with distinction) in legal and political theory from University College London, and a Juris Doctor (“J.D.”) (cum laude) from Northwestern University School of Law (“Northwestern”), where he was an associate editorserved as Executive Vice President of the Law Review. Mr. Cohen received the Sara Norton prize from Cambridge UniversityCompany and the First Prize in Lowden-Wigmore Prizes for Legal Scholarship from Northwestern. Mr. Cohen clerked for The Honorable Chief Judge Gregory W. CarmanExecutive Officer of the Courtour subsidiary XpresTest, Inc. since our January 2022 acquisition of International Trade.

H. Van Sinclair has been gcg Connect LLC d/b/a director at Vringo since July 19, 2012 and was a director of Innovate/Protect from November 7, 2011 through the consummation of the merger with Vringo. Since 2003, Mr. SinclairHyperPointe.  He also has served as President CEOand Chief Executive Officer of HyperPointe since March, 2020.  Prior to HyperPointe, he previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Physicians Weekly, LLC, a provider of medical news and education for healthcare professionals, from August 2015 to March 2020, Chief Commercial Officer of Treato, a health-related data analytics company, from September 2013 to August 2015 and General CounselManager at WebMD, an online publisher of The RLJ Companies (“RLJ”), the investment company organized by Robert L. Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television. RLJ owns or holds interests in diverse businesses, including private equity, financial services, asset management, insurance services, automobile dealerships, film production, sportshealth and entertainmentmedical news and video lottery terminal gaming. Mr. Sinclair currently serves as a director of RLJ Entertainment, Inc. a publicly traded company in the media rights business, and formerly served as President and a director of RLJ Acquisition, Inc., a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company that is now a subsidiary through merger of RLJ Entertainment, Inc. Mr. Sinclair also sits on additional boards RLJ’s portfolio investment companies. Mr. Sinclair has also served as Vice President of Legal and Business Affairs for RLJ Urban Lodging Funds, a private equity fund which concentrated on limited and focused service hotels; for RLJ Development, RLJ’s hotel and hospitality company; and as Acting President of the Charlotte Bobcats (now the Charlotte Hornets), the NBA franchise located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Mr. Sinclair has also served as a director of Urban Trust Bank, a federal thrift headquartered in Orlando, Florida, where he chaired the Audit Committee. Priorinformation, from December 2008 to joining RLJ, Mr. Sinclair specialized in complex commercial disputes and litigation for 28 years with the Washington, D.C. based law firm Arent Fox, PLLC (“Arent Fox”). In the late 1990’s, Mr. Sinclair became the partner in charge of litigation at Arent Fox, and today remains of counsel to the firm. Mr. Sinclair holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and a Master’s degree in business administration from the University of Rochester, and a J.D. from The George Washington University.

We believe Mr. Sinclair’s experiences in commercial disputes, litigation, and board service on other public companies qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

John Engelman has been our director since December 2010. Mr. Engelman also serves as an independent director of Hemisphere Media Group, Inc., a publically traded Hispanic media company that owns and operates television stations and cable networks in the United States, Puerto Rico and Latin America. Mr. Engelman was a co-founder of Classic Media, Inc. (“Classic Media”), a global media company specializing in family and children’s entertainment where he served as co-chief executive officer until 2012. During that time, he launched television and consumer products driven brands based on iconic entertainment properties such as Lassie, Casper the Friendly Ghost, Frosty the Snowman and Bullwinkle and Rocky. Mr. Engelman developed monetization strategies and oversaw the roll up of intellectual property assets from diverse rights holders. In August 2012, Classic Media was acquired by DreamWorks Animation SKG where Mr. Engelman currently co-heads the DreamWorks Classics division. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Engelman was co-chief executive officer of Boomerang Media, Inc. (“Boomerang Media”), an acquisition company controlled by GTCR Golder Rauner. From 1997 to 2001, he was an operating partner with Pegasus Capital Advisors and a managing director of Brener International Group, LLC. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Engelman was President of Broadway Video, Inc., a producer of live television and motion pictures. He began his career as a partner at the Los Angeles law firm of Irell & Manella. Mr. Engelman has a J.D. from Harvard Law School and a B.A. in Government from Harvard College.

We believe Mr. Engelman’s experience in the media and entertainment industries qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. His experience gained both as an executive at Classic Media and Boomerang Media are contributions to us and the Board of Directors.

Ashley C. Keller has been our director since December 31, 2012. Ashley Keller is co-founder and Chief Investment Officer of Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC, a private investment firm formed to invest in complex commercial legal claims. Prior to co-founding Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC, Mr. Keller was a special situations Analyst at Alyeska Investment Group (“Alyeska”), a hedge fund based in Chicago. In that position, he focused on investments in companies facing complex regulatory, legal, and other matters. Prior to joining Alyeska, Mr. Keller was an attorney with an array of experience in complex and high-stakes commercial litigation. He was a Partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, where he handled various trial and appellate matters involving securities and patent cases, contractual disputes, and mass-tort class actions. Before practicing law, Mr. Keller clerked for Judge Richard Posner at the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and Justice Anthony Kennedy at the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Keller graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University with a degree in Government. He received an MBA with high honors from the University Of Chicago Booth School Of Business, where he graduated in the top 5% of his class. He earned his J.D. with highest honors from the University of Chicago Law School, where he graduated first in his class.

We believe Mr. Keller’s experience in commercial litigation matters and involvement in securities and patent cases qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Noel J. Spiegel has been our director since May 6,January 2013. Mr. Spiegel is currently a director of American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., where he serves as chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee, as well as a director of Radian Group, Inc., where he serves as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Spiegel was a partner at Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), where he practiced from September 1969 until his retirement in May 2010. In his over forty year career at Deloitte, he served in numerous management positions, including Deputy Managing Partner, member of the Executive Committee and Partner-in-Charge of Audit Operations in Deloitte’s New York Office. Mr. Spiegel also served as Managing Partner of Deloitte’s Transaction Assurance practice, Global Offerings and International Financial Reporting Standards practice, and Technology, Media and Telecommunications practice for the Northeast Region. Mr. Spiegel holds a B.S. from Long Island University, and attended the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School.

We believe that Mr. Spiegel’s tenure of over forty years at Deloitte, coupled with his experience on public company boards of directors, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Donald E. Stout has been a director at Vringo since July 19, 2012 and was a director of Innovate/Protect from November 7, 2011 through the consummation of the merger with Vringo. In a career spanning over forty years, Mr. Stout has been involved in virtually all facets of intellectual property law. Mr. Stout is a partner at a law firm Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP since 2015 and he had been a senior partner at the law firm of Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP from 1982 to 2015. As an attorney in private practice, Mr. Stout has focused on litigation, licensing and representation of clients before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in diverse technological areas. From 1971 to 1972, Mr. Stout worked as a law clerk for two members of the USPTO Board of Appeals and, from 1968 to 1972. Mr. Stout was an assistant examiner at the USPTO, where he focused on patent applications covering radio and television technologies. Mr. Stout has written and prosecuted hundreds of patent applications in diverse technologies, rendered opinions on patent infringement and validity, and has testified as an expert witness regarding obtaining and prosecuting patents. Mr. Stout is also the co-founder of NTP Inc., which licensed Research in Motion (RIM), the maker of the Blackberry handheld devices, for $612.5 million to settle a patent infringement action. Mr. Stout also serves on the Board of Directors of Tessera Technologies, Inc. (TSRA). Mr. Stout is a member of the bars of the District of Columbia and Virginia, and is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the USPTO. Mr. Stout holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering, with distinction, from Pennsylvania State University, and a J.D., with honors, from The George Washington University.

We believe Mr. Stout’s experience in intellectual property law qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meetings

Meeting Attendance.  Attendance.During the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142023, there were eighteen (18)three meetings of our Board of Directors andas well as thirteen unanimous written consents of the Board of Directors. The various committees of the Board of Directors met a total of twelve (12) times. Noeleven times, collectively. Each director attended fewermore than 75%75 percent of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and each director serving on a committee attended more than 75 percent of committeesthe total number of meetings held by an applicable committee(s) of the Board of Directors on which hesuch director served during fiscal 2014.the year ended December 31, 2023.  The Board of Directors has adopted a policy under which each member of the Board of Directors is strongly encouraged, but not required, to attend each annual meeting of our stockholders.  All five of our 2023 directors attended our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Audit Committee.  Committee.Our Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”) met eight (8)four times during fiscal 2014. This committeethe year ended December 31, 2023. The Audit Committee currently has three (3) members, Noel J. Spiegelmembers: Robert Weinstein (Chairman), H. Van SinclairBruce T. Bernstein and Ashley C. Keller.Gaëlle Wizenberg. Effective as of January 1, 2024, Donald E. Stout ceased to be a member of the Board of Directors and all committees thereto, including the Audit Committee. As of January 30, 2024, Gaëlle Wizenberg was elected to be a member of the Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Audit Committee’s written charter and include the authority to retain and terminate the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews our annual and quarterly financial statements, considers matters relating to accounting policy and internal controls and reviews the scope of annual audits. All

The Board determined that all members of the Audit Committee satisfyqualify as independent under the current independencelisting standards promulgated by the United States SecuritiesSEC and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”),Nasdaq, as such standards apply specifically to members of audit committees. The Board of Directors has determined that both Messrs. SpiegelWeinstein and SinclairBernstein are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined

6

Table of Contents

by the SEC in Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

A copy of the Audit Committee’s written charter is publicly available through the “Investors — Corporate Governance” section of our website atwww.vringoip.com www.xwell.com/corporate-governance.

Compensation Committee.  Committee.Our Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) met six (6) timesone time during fiscal 2014.the year ended December 31, 2023. This committee currently has three (3) members, John Engelmanmembers: Bruce T. Bernstein (Chairman), Robert Weinstein and Gaëlle Wizenberg. Effective as of January 1, 2024, Donald E. Stout ceased to be a member of the Board of Directors and Noel J. Spiegel. Ashley C. Keller served asall committees thereof, including the Compensation Committee. As of January 30, 2024, Gaëlle Wizenberg was elected to be a member of the Compensation Committee through January 15, 2015. Mr. Stout joined the Compensation Committee on January 15, 2015.

Committee.

Our Compensation Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Compensation Committee’s written charter and includes reviewing, approving and making recommendations regarding our compensation policies, practices and procedures to ensure that legal and fiduciary responsibilities of the Board of Directors are carried out and that such policies, practices and procedures contribute to our success. Our Compensation Committee also administers our 2012 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) and our 2006 Stock Option2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006“2020 Plan”).  The Compensation Committee is responsible for (1) the determination of the compensation of our CEO,Chief Executive Officer, and shall conductconducts its decision makingdecision-making process with respect to that issue without the CEOChief Executive Officer present, (2) the determination of the compensation of the executive officers of the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer based upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and such other customary factors that the Committee deems necessary or appropriate, and (3) the establishment and reviewingreview of general compensation policies with the objective of attracting and retaining superior talent, rewarding individual performance and achieving our financial goals. The Compensation Committee has the authority to directly retain the services of independent consultants and other experts to assist in fulfilling its responsibilities. During fiscal year 2014, based on the recommendation of management,2023, the Compensation Committee did not engage third partya third-party compensation consultants.consultant, StreeterWyatt Analytics, to review the Board’s compensation structure as well as benchmark it against the Company’s peer group.  

AllThe Board determined all members of the Compensation Committee qualify as independent under the definition promulgated by NASDAQ.Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s written charter is publicly available through the “Investors — Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.vringoip.comwww.xwell.com/corporate-governance.

Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) met two (2) timesone time during fiscalthe year 2014 andended December 31, 2023.  This committee currently has two (2) members, H. Van Sinclairthree members: Bruce T. Bernstein (Chairman), Michael Lebowitz and Ashley C. Keller.Robert Weinstein. Effective as of January 1, 2024, Donald E. Stout ceased to be a member of the Board of Directors and all committees thereof, including the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  As of January 30, 2024, Michael Lebowitz was elected to be a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s written charter and is authorizedinclude authority to:

identify and nominate members of the Board of Directors;
oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors and management;
develop and recommend corporate governance guidelines to the Board of Directors;
evaluate the performance of the members of the Board of Directors; and
make recommendations to the Board of Directors as to the structure, composition and functioning of the Board of Directors and its committees.

We have no formal policy regarding board diversity. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors may therefore consider a broad range of factors relating to the qualifications and background of nominees, which may include diversity, which is not only limited to race, gender or national origin. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s and Board of Directors’ priority in selecting boardBoard members is identification of persons who will further the interests of our stockholders through his or her established record of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to the collaborative culture among boardBoard members and professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our growth strategy.

All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee qualify as independent under the definition promulgated by NASDAQ. In addition, under our current corporate governance policies, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider candidates recommended by stockholders as well as from other sources such as other directors or officers, third

7

Table of Contents

party search firms or other appropriate sources. For all potential candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider all factors it deems relevant, such as a candidate’s personal integrity and sound judgment, business and professional skills and experience, independence, knowledge of the industry in which we operate, possible conflicts of interest, diversity, the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board of Directors, and concern for the long-term interests of the stockholders. In general, persons recommended by stockholders will be considered on the same basis as candidates from other sources.

The Board determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee qualify as independent under the Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s written charter is publicly available through the “Investors — Corporate Governance” section of our website atwww.vringoip.comwww.xwell.com/corporate-governance.

The Strategic Affairs Committee.The Strategic Affairs Committee (the “Strategic Affairs Committee”) met four times during the year ended December 31, 2023.  This committee was formed in September 2021 to assist the Board in reviewing, analyzing, considering and assessing, potential acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic investments, divestitures and other strategic transactions. The Strategic Affairs Committee currently has three members: Bruce T. Bernstein (Chairman), Robert Weinstein and Michael Lebowitz.  The Strategic Affairs Committee’s responsibilities include, among others:

assisting management with the identification of potential acquisition, joint venture, strategic investment, divestiture and other strategic transaction opportunities and review transaction candidates with management, when and as appropriate;
evaluating strategic transactions received by the Company or proposed by management; and
overseeing and coordinating the process of reviewing, analyzing and responding to proposals received by the Company or proposed by management with respect to such potential acquisition, joint venture, strategic investment, divestiture and other strategic transaction opportunities.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Mr. Perlman currently servesEffective as our CEO and Mr. Sinclair, a non-management director, serves as our lead independent director. Ifof February 5, 2018, the Board of Directors convenes for a special meeting,appointed Bruce T. Bernstein as the non-management directors will meet in executive session if circumstances warrant. Mr. Sinclair, as lead independent director, will preside over executive sessionsnon-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

The leadership structure of the Board currently consists of a Chairman of the Board who oversees the Board meetings. We separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in recognition of the differences between the two roles. Our Board believes this division of responsibility is an effective approach for addressing the risks we face. All of our Board committees are comprised of only independent directors. All Board committees are chaired by independent directors who report to the full Board whenever necessary. We believe this leadership structure helps facilitate efficient decision-making and communication among our directors and fosters efficient Board functioning at meetings.

Our management is primarily responsible for managing the risks we face in the ordinary course of operating our business. The Board oversees potential risks and our risk management activities by receiving operational and strategic presentations from management which include discussions of Directors overseeskey risks to our business and considers the risks associated with our business strategy and decisions.business. The Board also periodically discusses with management important compliance and quality issues. In addition, the Board has delegated risk oversight to each of Directors currently implementsits key committees within their areas of responsibility. For example, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to our financial statements and related disclosures. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in its risk oversight function as a whole. Uponby overseeing strategies with respect to our incentive compensation programs and key employee retention issues. We believe our Board leadership structure facilitates the formationdivision of eachrisk management oversight responsibilities among the Board committees and enhances the Board’s efficiency in fulfilling its oversight function with respect to different areas of our business risks and our risk mitigation practices.

8

Table of Contents

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any of the board committees,following events during the committees will also provide risk oversightpast ten years:

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);
being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors and report any material risks toexecutive officers.

9

Table of Contents

Board Diversity Matrix

The Nasdaq diversity matrix is set forth below as required under the Boardlisting requirements of Directors.Nasdaq.

Board Diversity Matrix (As of April 29, 2024)

Total Number of Directors - 5

    

    

    

    

Female

Male

Non-Binary

Did Not Disclose Gender

Part I: Gender Identity

Directors

1

4

Part II: Demographic Background

African American or Black

Alaskan Native or Native American

Asian

Hispanic or Latinx

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

White

1

4

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

LGBTQ+

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our directors executiveand officers, and beneficial owners ofpersons who own more than 10%ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in the ownership of our common stockstock. To our knowledge, based solely on  our records and other equity securities. Such persons are required to furnish us copies of all Section 16(a) filings.

Based solely upon a review of the copies of the formssuch reports furnished to us, we believe that our officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2023, we believe that all reports applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders which were required to be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were filed on a timely basis.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a codeCode of conductConduct and ethicsEthics that applies to all of our employees, including our CEOprincipal executive officer and chiefprincipal financial and accounting officers.officer. The text of the codeCode of conductConduct and ethicsEthics is posted on the “Investors — Corporate Governance” section of our website atwww.vringoip.comwww.xwell.com/corporate-governance, and will be made available to stockholders without charge, upon request, in writing to the Corporate Secretary at 780 Third Avenue, 12th254 West 31st Street 11th Floor, New York, New York 10017.10001. Disclosure regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the code of conduct and ethics that apply to our directors, principal executive and financial officers will be included in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, unless website posting or the issuance of a press release of such amendments or waivers is then permitted by Nasdaq rules.

Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of our securities by our directors, officers and employees. The insider trading policy is designed to promote compliance with respect to insider trading laws, rules and regulations.

10

Table of NASDAQ.Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We have prepared the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) to provide you with information that we believe is necessary to understand our executive compensation policies and decisions as they relate to the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”).

Overview

Below is a summary of our NEOs as of December 31, 2014:

Andrew D. PerlmanChief Executive Officer and Director
Andrew Kennedy LangChief Technology Officer, President and Director
Anastasia NyrkovskayaChief Financial Officer
David L. Cohen, Esq.Chief Legal and Intellectual Property Officer

In addition, Alexander R. Berger served as our Chief Operating Officer and Director through December 19, 2014, at which time he ceased to be an executive officer of the Company.

Company Performance, Compensation Determination Process, and Related Compensation Decisions

During 2014, a variety of decisions occurred with respect to the I/P Engine litigation against AOL Inc., Google Inc. et al. On August 15, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) reversed a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia by holding that the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit in the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary I/P Engine's litigation against AOL Inc., Google Inc. et al. are invalid for obviousness. On October 15, 2014, I/P Engine filed a petition for rehearing en banc, in which it argued that the majority's opinion in this case presents important questions of law and is at odds with a series of Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions which do not allow appellate judges to disregard a jury's detailed findings under these circumstances. I/P Engine argued that review is particularly appropriate here, where the panel majority not only failed to adopt the proper legal standard, but explicitly rejected it.On December 15, 2014, the Federal Circuit denied I/P Engine's petition for rehearing of the case en banc and consequently, we announced thatI/P Engine will seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court of the Federal Circuit's decision.

During the second half of the year, the Company’s stock price declined and the closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2014 was $0.55.The decline in stock price resulted in a significantly lower market capitalization and, as a result, influenced the Company’s compensation decisions.In addition, as a result of our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company received a 65% vote in support of its executive compensation program in the 2014 Say-on-Pay advisory vote (the “Advisory Vote”) and this was taken into account by the Compensation Committee.

In establishing compensation amounts for executives, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation that is competitive in light of current market conditions and industry practices. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee annually reviews market data which is comprised of proxy-disclosed data from peer companies and information from nationally recognized published surveys for general and high-technology industry, adjusted for size. For 2014, these peer companies included VirnetX (NYSE:VHC), Acacia Research Corporation (NASDAQ:ACTG), Interdigital, Inc. (NASDAQ: IDCC), Unwired Planet, Inc. (NASDAQ:UPIP), Parkervision Inc. (NASDAQ:PRKR), Pendrell Corporation (NASDAQ:PCO), and Document Security Systems, Inc. (NYSE:DSS). The market data helps the Compensation Committee gain perspective on the compensation levels and practices at the peer companies and to assess the relative competitiveness of the compensation paid to the company’s executives. The market data thus guides the Compensation Committee in its efforts to set executive compensation levels and program targets at competitive levels for comparable roles in the marketplace. The Compensation Committee then takes into account other factors, such as the importance of each executive officer’s role to the company, individual expertise, experience, and performance, retention concerns and relevant compensation trends in the marketplace, in making its final compensation determinations.

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each NEO annually in light of the above factors and determines whether the NEO should receive any increase in base salary or receive a discretionary equity award based on such evaluation. The CEO also provides input related to the performance and compensation evaluation of each NEO, but does not provide input related to his own performance and compensation evaluation. During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee did not utilize quantitative measures connected to financial results, such as revenues or profitability, with respect to compensation, as the Company did not generate net income during the year.

Our Compensation Committee held six meetings during 2014 to consider appropriate actions with respect to executive compensation including the appropriateness of cash bonuses, salary increases, and granting equity awards for 2014 performance.The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directorsconcluded that there would be no cash bonuses paid to employees,including the CEO and all other NEOs, for 2014 as the Company did not generate net income during the year. Further,the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors decided that there would be no annual equity awards granted tothe CEO or the other NEOsin early 2015 given our 2014 results and decline in the stock price.The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors also decided that there would be no salary increases for the CEO or all other executive officers, except for contractual salary increases of $15,000 to both Mr. Perlman and Mr. Berger, and salary increases of $15,000 to both Mr. Cohen and Ms. Nyrkovskaya to reflect the increase in cost of living. The results of the Advisory Vote were also taken into consideration by the Compensation Committee in making these decisions and in evaluating the full scale of executive compensation for 2014. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that these decisions demonstrate the strong linkage between executive pay and feedback from our investors and our Company’s 2014 financial results.

During the first quarter of 2014, we granted Ms. Nyrkovskaya 300,000 options, and Mr. Cohen 100,000 options, both at an exercise price of $4.10, vesting quarterly over a three year period, related to their individual performance during 2013. The decision to do so was made based on the results of the market data review and other analyses performed by the Compensation Committee, in order to adjust the compensation of these individuals to competitive levels for comparable roles in the marketplace. There were no other equity awards granted to NEOs in 2014.

The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe the 2014 compensation decisions and the overall executive compensation program are tailored to our business strategies, align pay with performance, and take into account feedback received from investors. We will continue our engagement with our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program as well as other governance matters.

Compensation Components and Philosophy

We currently provide two basic forms of direct compensation to our employees, including the CEO and the other NEOs: base salary and equity awards. Equity awards include stock options to purchase shares of our common stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Equity awards granted to our NEOs typically vest in equal quarterly installments, over a period of three years. On an annual basis, each of these compensation components are reviewed by our Compensation Committee for each of our employees, including our CEO and the other NEOs, to ensure that compensation levels remain appropriate. We have not historically paid annual cash bonuses to our NEOs.

Overall, we and our Compensation Committee, are committed to the principle that executive compensation should be directly tied into value creation for our shareholders.

Historically, the Company has not experienced substantial revenues or positive cash flows, and accordingly, no annual cash bonuses have been paid to our CEO or the other NEOs. In addition, the value of stock options granted to executives are contingent upon performance of our Company’s stock, while time-based RSU granted in the past further align our executives with our shareholders by providing executives with meaningful, direct ownership stake in our stock.

Our goal is to attract and retain the best available executive talent to lead our Company. This can be challenging given the competitive environment in which we operate and considering the Company’s limited financial resources until we achieve sufficient revenues, if ever. We also strive to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. Therefore, a substantial portion of our executives’ compensation is structured as long-term equity compensation including stock options and RSUs.

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with our NEOs. Each of these agreements provides for certain payments and other benefits if the executive’s employment terminates under certain circumstances other than for “cause,” including in connection with a “change in control.” See the subsection “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for a description of the agreement terms impacting current compensation and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” for a description of applicable severance and change in control benefits.

Our Compensation Committee believes that change-in-control and severance arrangements are important parts of the overall compensation program for our NEOs. Severance arrangements are used primarily to attract, retain and motivate individuals with the requisite experience and ability to drive our success. Severance arrangements also serve, in part, as consideration to secure commitments from our executive officers not to compete with us after termination of their employment.

Compensation Policies and Practices Related to Risk Management

Consistent with SEC disclosure requirements, we have evaluated the potential risks related to our compensation policies, practices and awards and have concluded that there are no risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We do not have any programs where a participant may be able to directly affect variability or timing of payout. Rather, our compensation programs include a combination of fixed base salaries and, equity awards that are generally uniform in design and operation throughout the Company.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with members of management the CD&A section included in this Form 10-K/A, as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this Form 10-K/A.

Members of the Compensation Committee

John Engelman, Chairman

Ashley C. Keller

Noel J. Spiegel

Donald E. Stout

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, Messrs. Engelman, Keller and Spiegel served as members of our Compensation Committee. In 2014, none of our executive officers served on the Board of Directors or compensation committee of any entity that had one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. There are no family relationships between or among the members of our Board of Directors or executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table showssummarizes the total compensation awarded or paid or accruedby us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 20132023 and 20122022 to (1)(i) our Chief Executive Officer, (2) our Chief Technology Officer and President, (3) our Chief Financial Officer, and (4) our Chief Legal and Intellectual Property Officer, who are all of ourprincipal executive officers during and atofficer, (ii) the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The table also includes our Former Chief Operating Officer, who would have been among the threetwo most highly compensated executive officers exceptother than the principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2023, and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under clause (ii) but for the fact that hethe person was not serving as an executive officer of the Company as ofat the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2023 (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

                  
Name and principal position Year 

Salary

($)

  

Stock

awards

($) (1)

  

Option

awards

($) (1))

  

All other

compensation

($)

  

Total

($)

 
Andrew D. Perlman 2014  400,000            400,000 
Chief Executive Officer 2013  385,000   556,500   1,425,675      2,367,175 
  2012  240,289   2,511,100   4,289,556(2)  169,080   7,209,925 
                       

Andrew Kennedy Lang

 2014  385,000            385,000 
Chief Technology Officer and President                      
                       

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya

 2014  312,938      695,051      1,007,989 
Chief Financial Officer                      
                       
David L. Cohen, Esq. 2014  312,938      231,684      544,622 
Chief Legal and Intellectual 2013  300,000   159,000   456,216      915,216 
Property Officer 2012  163,343   186,000   1,781,963      2,131,306 
                       
Alexander R. Berger 2014  389,487            389,487 
Former Chief 2013  385,000   556,500   1,368,648      2,310,148 
Operating Officer(3) 2012  102,836   2,511,000   3,419,870      6,033,706 

    

    

    

Non-Equity

    

    

    

Incentive Plan

Option

Restricted Stock

All Other

Salary

Compensation

Awards

Unit Awards

Compensation

Total 

Name and principal position

Year

 ($)

 ($)

($)(1)

($)(1)

($)(5)

($)

Scott R. Milford(2)

 

2023

 

425,000

 

52,379

 

39,150

 

516,529

Chief Executive Officer

2022

 

413,462

 

181,704

 

36,290

615,500

 

1,246,956

Suzanne A. Scrabis(3)

2023

135,367

784

6,525

22,800

165,476

Chief Financial Officer

Omar A Haynes(4)

 

2023

 

317,893

 

26,244

 

8,700

25,450

 

378,286

Former Interim Chief Financial Officer

2022

251,250

101,856

36,290

65,000

454,397

Ezra T. Ernst(5)

 

2023

 

375,000

 

27,379

8,700

411,079

Executive Vice President of XWELL, Chief Executive Officer of XpresTest and President and Chief Executive Officer of HyperPointe

 

2022

318,425

362,900

681,325

(1)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.718. For the assumptions made in the valuation of our equity awards see Notes 2(k)2 and 1015 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing.
(2)Mr. Milford is currently our Annual Report on Form 10-KChief Executive Officer, effective as of January 19, 2022. Prior to that, he served as our Chief Operating Officer since December 14, 2020. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2014.
(2)Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted during 2012 with exercise prices of $3.72, $1.65, and $0.96 per option.
(3)

Mr. Berger served as our Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Board of Directors until his resignation on December 19, 2014. All of Mr. Berger’s outstanding options that were granted in 2013 and 2012 were forfeited for no consideration in connection with his resignation. His remaining unvested RSUs that were granted in 2013 and 2012 were forfeited for no consideration in connection with the termination of his consultant agreement on March 13, 2015.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table shows information regarding grants of equity awards that were made during the year ended December 31, 2014 to our NEOs. All awards were made under our 2012 Plan. There were no grants of non-equity incentive plan awards to our NEOs during 2014.

            
Name and principal position Grant Date Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(1)  

Exercise Price of Option

Awards

($ per Share)

  

Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards

($)(2)

 

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya

Chief Financial Officer

 February 20, 2014  300,000  $4.10  $695,051 
               

David L. Cohen, Esq.

Chief Litigation and Intellectual Property Officer

 February 20, 2014  100,000  $4.10  $231,684 
               

Andrew D. Perlman

Chief Executive Officer

          
               

Andrew Kennedy Lang

Chief Technology Officer and President)

          
               

Alexander R. Berger

Former Chief Operating Officer

          

(1)One-twelfth (1/12) of the number of options granted vest on the last day of each calendar quarter over three (3) years, beginning with the end of the first quarter of 2014.

(2)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For the assumptions made in the valuation of our2023 includes equity awards see Notes 2(k) and 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-Kof stock options. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2014.2022 includes equity awards of stock options and restricted stock.
(3)Ms. Scrabis is our current Chief Financial Officer, effective as of July 10, 2023. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2023 includes equity awards of stock options and restricted stock.
(4)Mr. Hayneswas our former Interim Chief Financial Officer, effective as of June 13, 2022. On July 10, 2023, upon the appointment of Suzanne A. Scrabis to the role of Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Haynes resumed his former role as Vice President of Treasury & Finance, effective as of the same date. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2023 includes equity awards of stock options and restricted stock. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes equity awards of stock options and restricted stock.
(5)Mr. Ernst has served as the Executive Vice President and the Chief Executive Officer of XpresTest Inc. since January 9, 2022.  Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2023 includes equity awards of stock options. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes equity awards of stock options.

11

Table of Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Andrew D. Perlman

Scott R. Milford

On March 18, 2010,July 8, 2019, we entered into an employment agreement with Andrew D. PerlmanMr. Milford, pursuant to which providedhe agreed to serve as our Chief People Officer for 90 days’ noticean annual base salary of termination$280,000 and $300,000, for the year ended July 31, 2020 and the year ending on July 31, 2021, respectively. After July 31, 2021, Mr. Milford continued to be employed by the Company as an ‘at will’ employee, subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Milford was also entitled to a one-time 10% minimum guaranteed bonus for 2019 to be calculated off his base salary as of his July 8, 2019 commencement date as well as to participate in any annual bonus or other thanincentive compensation program that the Company may adopt from time to time for causeits executive officers. Mr. Milford was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in December 2020; no changes to his compensation were made at that time in connection with the promotion.

On March 28, 2022, the Company and Mr. Milford entered into an executive employment agreement (the “Milford Employment Agreement”), effective as of January 19, 2022, the date of Mr. Milford’s assumption of the role of Chief Executive Officer. The Milford Employment Agreement had a term of two years from its effective date of January 19, 2022, and terminated on January 19, 2024. The Milford Employment Agreement entitled Mr. Milford to receive an annual base salary of $425,000. Mr. Milford continues to be employed by the Company as an “at will” employee.  He is also eligible to participate in any annual bonus and other incentive compensation program that the Company may adopt from time to time for its executive officers. Prior to January 19, 2024, Mr. Milford was eligible to earn an annual bonus, the target amount of which is up to one hundred percent (100%) of his base salary, based upon the achievement of performance goals and metrics established by the Board at its sole discretion. Any applicable bonus was determined as soon as reasonably practicable after our annual financial statements were finalized and was split 50/50 between cash and a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with respect to our common stock.

Prior to January 19, 2024, in the event the Milford Employment Agreement was terminated for good reason by Mr. Milford, or by the Company without cause and Mr. PerlmanMilford provided the Company with a release of claims, Mr. Milford was entitled to receive a cash severance payment in order to resign. Duringthe amount of one hundred percent (100%) of his then current base salary and one year of COBRA continuation coverage.  In addition, the agreement contained non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that applied during the term of hisMr. Milford’s employment through March 31, 2012, Mr. Perlman’sand for six months thereafter. As of January 19, 2024, the Milford Employment Agreement is no longer in effect.

Suzanne A. Scrabis

For her service as Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to an offer letter, dated as of June 26, 2023, by and between us and Ms. Scrabis (the “Scrabis Offer Letter”), Ms. Scrabis receives an annual base salary was $175,000. In addition, he wasof $300,000, subject to review by the Compensation Committee. Ms. Scrabis is eligible to receive $5,000an annual cash bonus with a target of 50% of her base salary, which was not pro rated for 2023 and half of which amount is guaranteed. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Ms. Scrabis received a cash bonus of $75,000. Ms. Scrabis is additionally eligible to participate in Company’s long-term incentive plan with the potential to receive stock options valued at up to 1.75 times her annual base salary (pro-rated for 2023). Ms. Scrabis received (i) non-qualified stock options to purchase 3,750 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $4.60, and (ii) 5,000 RSUs, with each grant made as of July 10, 2023 and vesting in four quarterly installments on the end of each quarter.first, second, third and fourth quarters after the grant date.

In March 2012, Mr. Perlman was appointedthe event Ms. Scrabis terminates her employment for good reason, or by the Company without cause (each as our Chief Executive Officer. In connection with Mr. Perlman’s new position, the Board of Directors agreed to the following revised employment terms: base salary of $250,000 per year and severance equal to one year’s base salary to be paiddefined in the event he ceases to be our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to a change of control transaction.

On February 13, 2013, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Perlman. Mr. Perlman’s employment agreement has a term of three (3) years. Mr. PerlmanScrabis Offer Letter) and Ms. Scrabis provides the Company have agreed to commence negotiations to enter intowith a new employment agreement at least six (6) months prior to the expirationrelease of the three-year term and to conclude those negotiations no later than the date that is three (3) months prior to the expiration of the term of the employment agreement. Under the terms of the new employment agreement, Mr. Perlman received a base salary of $385,000 effective January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2013. From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, Mr. Perlman received a base salary of $400,000. From January 1, 2015 through the remainder of the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Perlmanclaims, Ms. Scrabis will be entitled to receive a payment equal to 50% of her then-current base salary, payable in installments over a period of six months.

Omar A. Haynes

For his service as Interim Chief Financial Officer, which terminated on July 10, 2023, upon the appointment of Suzanne A. Scrabis as our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Haynes received a base salary of $415,000. In addition, Mr. Perlman will be$288,750 annually, that was subject to review by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors. He was eligible to receive an annual cash

12

Table of Contents

bonus with a target of 50% of his base salary and was eligible to participate in any annual bonus or other incentive compensation program that wethe Company may adopt from time to time for ourits executive officers. In addition, on February 1, 2013, we

Ezra T. Ernst

On January 9, 2022, the Company and Mr. Ernst entered into an indemnificationexecutive employment agreement (the “Ernst Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Ernst serves as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of XpresTest.  The Ernst Employment Agreement has a term of three years from the date of closing of the Company’s acquisition of Hyperpointe.  Pursuant to the Ernst Employment Agreement, Mr. Ernst is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $375,000. He is also eligible to participate in any annual bonus and other incentive compensation program that the Company may adopt from time to time for its executive officers. Mr. Ernst is eligible to earn an annual bonus, the target amount of which is up to fifty percent (50%) of his base salary, based upon the achievement of performance goals and metrics established by the Board at its sole discretion. Any bonus will be determined as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company’s annual financial statements are finalized and will be split 50/50 between cash and a grant of RSUs with Mr. Perlman.respect to the Company’s common stock.

In the event the employment agreementErnst Employment Agreement is terminated for (i) Good Reasongood reason by Mr. Perlman,Ernst, or (ii) by usthe Company without Cause,cause and Mr. PerlmanErnst provides the Company with a release of claims, Mr. Ernst shall be entitled to receive ana cash severance payment in the amount of base salary (at the rateone hundred percent (100%) of base salary in effect immediately prior to such termination) equal to the lesser of (x) one times thehis then current base salary and (y) two times the base salary payable for the numberone year of full months remaining in the employment period, and COBRA continuation coverage paid in full by us for up to a maximum of twelve months following the date of termination. “Cause” as used Mr. Perlman’s employment agreement means: (a) the willful and continued failure of Mr. Perlman to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities for the Company (other than any such failure resulting from his death or disability) after a written demand by the Board of Directors for substantial performance is delivered to Mr. Perlman by the Company, which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board of Directors believes that Mr. Perlman has not substantially performed his duties and responsibilities, which willful and continued failure is not cured by Mr. Perlman within thirty days of his receipt of such written demand; (b) the conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony, (c) intentional breach of his non-compete obligations, (d) an intentional breach of the non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement; or (e) a unanimous good faith finding by the Board of Directors that Mr. Perlman has engaged in fraud, dishonesty, gross negligence or misconduct which, if curable, has not been cured within thirty days after his receipt of a written notice from the Board of Directors stating with reasonable specificity the basis of such finding. “Good Reason” as used Mr. Perlman’s employment agreement means (a) the assignment, without Mr. Perlman’s consent, to Mr. Perlman of duties that result in a substantial diminution of the duties that he assumed; provided, however, the failure of Mr. Perlman to be reelected to the Board of Directors shall not be deemed to be a diminution of duties; (b) the assignment, without Mr. Perlman’s consent, of a title that is subordinate to the title Chief Executive Officer; (c) a reduction in Mr. Perlman’s base salary; (d) the Company’s requirement that Mr. Perlman regularly report to work in a location that is more than fifty miles from the Company’s current New York office, without the Mr. Perlman’s consent; (e) a change in reporting relationship, provided however, that Good Reason does not include a change in the reporting relationship whereby Mr. Perlman will report to the Board of Directors of an acquiring company after a change of control (as that term is defined in the Company’s 2012 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan); or (f) a material breach by the Company of Mr. Perlman’s employment agreement.

Mr. Perlman’s employment agreement requires Mr. Perlman to assign intellectual property which he conceives or reduces to practice during his employment to us and to maintain our confidential information during employment and thereafter. Mr. Perlman is also subject to a non-competition and a non-solicitation provision for a period of two years following termination of his employment.

Andrew Kennedy Lang

Mr. Lang’s current employment agreement terminates on September 22, 2015.coverage.  In the event that the employment agreement is terminated by (i) us without Cause, or (ii) by Mr. Lang with Good Reason, Mr. Lang shall be entitled to receive twelve (12) months of base salary, continued coverage, at the Company'sexpense, under all benefit plans in which Mr. Lang was a participantimmediately prior to his last date of employment with the Company, or, in the eventthat any such benefit plans do not permit coverage of Mr. Lang following his lastdate of employment with the Company, under benefit plans that provide no lesscoverage than such benefit plans, for a period following the termination ofemployment oftwelve (12) months, and a pro rata bonuspayment, payable in a lump sum, for the year in which Mr. Lang’s employment isterminated, which shall be pro-rated based upon the number of full weeks worked byMr. Lang in such year and calculated as the greater of (a) the bonus paid toMr. Lang in the calendar year immediately prior to the year in which his employmentis terminated, if any, and (b) the bonus payable to Mr. Lang in the year in which hisemployment is terminated based upon the achievement of Company and/or individualobjectives established for the achievement of a bonus in such year, if any.

In the event that Mr. Lang terminates the employment agreement with Good Reason or in the event that we terminate the employment agreement without Cause, the party terminatingaddition, the agreement must inform the other party thirty (30) days before doing so. “Cause” as used in Mr. Lang’s employment agreement means: (a) the willfulcontains non-solicitation and continued failure of Mr. Lang to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities for the Company (other than any such failure resulting from Mr. Lang’s death or disability) after a written demand by the Company’s Board of Directors for substantial performance is delivered to Mr. Lang by the Company, which specifically identifies the manner in which the Company’s Board of Directors believes that Mr. Lang has not substantially performed his duties and responsibilities, which willful and continued failure is not cured by Mr. Lang within thirty (30) days of his receipt of such written demand, (b) the conviction of, or plea of guilty ornolo contendereto a felony, (c) violation of the Confidential Information, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation, or Non-Disparagement sections of the employment agreement, or (d) fraud, dishonesty or gross misconduct, which is materially and demonstratively injurious to the Company. “Good Reason” as used in Mr. Lang’s employment agreement means: (a) the assignment, without Mr. Lang’s consent, to Mr. Lang of duties that are significantly different from, or that result in a substantial diminution of, the duties that he assumed on the effective date of the employment agreement, (b) the assignment, without Mr. Lang’s consent, to Mr. Lang of a title that is different from and subordinate to his current title, (c) a reduction in Mr. Lang’s base salary, (d) the Company's requirement that Mr. Lang regularly report to work in a location that is more than thirty miles from the Company’s New York office as of the date of the employment agreement, without Mr. Lang’s consent, or (e) a material breach by the Company of the employment agreement.

Mr. Lang’s employment agreement requires Mr. Lang to assign intellectual property which he conceives or reduces to practice during his employment to us and to maintain our confidential information during employment and thereafter. Mr. Lang is also subject to (i) a non-competition and a non-solicitation provision for a period of one year, which we, upon notice, may increase to two years, and (ii) a non-disparagement provision for a period of three years, following termination of his employment.

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya

On December 19, 2014, we entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Nyrkovskayafor an eighteen month term. Under the terms of her employment agreement, Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s annual base salary is $315,000. In the event the employment agreement is terminated for (i) Good Reason by Ms. Nyrkovskaya, or (ii) by the Company without Cause, Ms. Nyrkovskaya shall be entitled to receive an amount of base salary at the rate of base salary in effect immediately prior to such termination equal to twelve months of base salary, and COBRA continuation coverage paid in full by the Company for up to a maximum of twelve months following the date of termination.

In case the agreement is terminated by Ms. Nyrkovskaya without Good Reason, she shall provide the Company with a written notice, at least ninety calendar days prior to such termination. "Cause" as used in Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s employment agreement means: (a) the willful and continued failure of Ms. Nyrkovskaya to perform substantially her duties and responsibilities for the Company (other than any such failure resulting from her death or disability) after a written demand by the chief executive officer for substantial performance is delivered to Ms. Nyrkovskaya by the Company, which specifically identifies the manner in which the chief executive officer believes that Ms. Nyrkovskaya has not substantially performed her duties and responsibilities, which willful and continued failure is not cured by Ms. Nyrkovskaya within thirty days of her receipt of such written demand; (b) the conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony, (c) breach of her non-compete obligations, (d) breach of the non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement; or (e) a good faith finding by the chief executive officer that Ms. Nyrkovskaya has engaged in fraud, intentional dishonesty, or gross negligence. "Good Reason" as used Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s employment agreement means (a) the assignment, without Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s consent, to Ms. Nyrkovskaya of duties that result in a substantial diminution of the duties that she assumed; (b) the assignment, without Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s consent, of a title that is subordinate to the title Chief Financial Officer; (c) a reduction in Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s base salary; (d) the Company’s requirement that Ms. Nyrkovskaya regularly report to work in a location that is more than fifty miles from the Company’s current New York office, without Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s consent; (e) a material breach by the Company of the agreement during its term. Ms. Nyrkovskaya’s employment agreement also includes a covenant not to compete with the Company or solicit any material commercial relationships of the Company for a period of one year after Ms. Nyrkovskaya is actually no longer employed by the Company.

David L. Cohen, Esq.

On July 19, 2012, we assumed all of the duties, obligations and liabilities of Innovate/Protect under the employment agreement with David L. Cohen. Mr. Cohen’s employment was at will, meaning that either the employee or the Company may have terminated the relationship with or without cause, without any prior notice. Under the terms of his agreement, Mr. Cohen was entitled to receive a base salary of $200,000. Pursuant to the consummation of the merger, on August 10, 2012, Mr. Cohen’s compensation was increased to $300,000.

On May 7, 2013, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Cohen, for a three-year term, unless sooner terminated, in accordance with the terms set therein. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Cohen is currently entitled to receive a base salary of $300,000. In the event the employment agreement is terminated for (i) Good Reason by Mr. Cohen, or (ii) by the Company without Cause, Mr. Cohen shall be entitled to receive an amount of base salary (at the rate of base salary in effect immediately prior to such termination) equal to twelve months of base salary, and COBRA continuation coverage paid in full by the Company for up to a maximum of twelve months following the date of termination.

In case the agreement is terminated by Mr. Cohen without Good Reason, he shall provide the Company with a written notice, at least ninety calendar days prior to such termination. “Cause” as used Mr. Cohen’s employment agreement means: (a) the willful and continued failure of Mr. Cohen to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities for the Company (other than any such failure resulting from his death or disability) after a written demand by the Board of Directors for substantial performance is delivered to Mr. Cohen by the Company, which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board of Directors believes that Mr. Cohen has not substantially performed his duties and responsibilities, which willful and continued failure is not cured by Mr. Cohen within thirty days of his receipt of such written demand; (b) the conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony, (c) intentional breach of his non-compete obligations, (d) an intentional breach of the non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement; or (e) a unanimous good faith finding by the Board of Directors or the chief executive officer that Mr. Cohen has engaged in fraud, dishonesty, gross negligence. “Good Reason” as used Mr. Cohen’s employment agreement means (a) the assignment, without Mr. Cohen’s consent, to Mr. Cohen of duties that result in a substantial diminution of the duties that he assumed; (b) the assignment, without Mr. Cohen’s consent, of a title that is subordinate to the title Chief Legal and Intellectual Property Officer; (c) a reduction in Mr. Cohen’s base salary; (d) the Company’s requirement that Mr. Cohen regularly report to work in a location that is more than fifty miles from the Company’s current New York office, without the Mr. Cohen’s consent; (e) a material breach by the Company of the agreement during its term. Mr. Cohen’s employment agreement also includes a covenant not to compete with the Company or solicit any material commercial relationships of the Company for a period of two years after Mr. Cohen is actually no longer employed by the Company.

16

Alexander R. Berger

On July 19, 2012, we assumed all of the duties, obligations and liabilities of Innovate/Protect under the employment agreement with Alexander R. Berger. Mr. Berger’s employment agreement had an initial term of eighteen months, with an option to either renegotiate the terms of the employment agreement prior to the expiration of the initial term. Under the terms of his agreement, Mr. Berger was entitled to receive a base salary of $150,000 and, upon the subsequent filing of a Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Statement, and consummation of financing of at least $7,000,000, his base salary was increased to $250,000. His agreement required us to provide him with 30 days’ notice of termination other than for cause and for him to provide us with 30 days’ notice of resignation.

On February 13, 2013, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Berger. Mr. Berger’s prior employment agreement with us expired by its terms on February 9, 2013. Mr. Berger’s new employment agreement had a term of three years. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Berger received a base salary of $385,000 effective January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2013. From January 1, 2014 until his resignation, Mr. Berger received a base salary of $400,000. In addition, on February 1, 2013, we entered into an indemnification agreement with Mr. Berger. Mr. Berger’s employment agreement also included a covenant not to compete with the Company or solicit any material commercial relationships of the Company for a period of two years after Mr. Berger is actually no longer employed by the Company.

On December 19, 2014, Mr. Berger resigned from his positions as Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. In connection with Mr. Berger’s resignation from his positions at the Company, he has agreed to transition to the role of an independent consultant pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Company. The consulting agreement terminates and supersedes the employment agreement between Mr. Berger and the Company, with the exception of certain noncompetition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation provisions that are to continue throughapply during the term of the consulting agreement. Mr. Ernst’s employment and for six months thereafter.

As a condition

13

Table of entering into the consulting agreement, Mr. Berger and the Company executed a mutual general release of claims that either party has or in the future may have against the other. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, Mr. Berger received a monthly retainer at a rate of $10,000 per month; in addition, all restricted stock units granted by the Company to Mr. Berger continued to vest in accordance with their terms until Mr. Berger ceased providing services to the Company, and all stock options outstanding, whether vested or unvested, were forfeited for no consideration.  Contents

The consulting agreement with Mr. Berger was terminated on March 13, 2015 and his then unvested restricted stock units were forfeited. Pursuant to the consulting agreement Mr. Berger received fees of $25,000.

17

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20142023 Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of stock options and unvested stock awards outstanding on the last day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2023, to each of our NEOs.named executive officers.

  Options Awards Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)

exercisable

  Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) un-exercisable  

Option

exercise

price

($)

  

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units that

have not

vested

(#)

  

Market

value of

shares or

units that

have not

vested

($)(*)

 
Andrew D. Perlman  90,000      5.50  March 17, 2016      
Andrew D. Perlman  90,000      5.50  January 31, 2017      
Andrew D. Perlman(1)            295,313   162,422 
Andrew D. Perlman(2)  1,062,500   212,500   3.72  July 26, 2022      
Andrew D. Perlman(2)  328,167      1.65  March 13, 2018      
Andrew D. Perlman(2)  416,667   208,333   3.18  February 11, 2023      
Andrew D. Perlman(2)            58,333   32,083 
Andrew Kennedy Lang(2)  208,333   41,667   3.72  July 26, 2022      
Andrew Kennedy Lang(2)  55,555   27,778   3.18  February 11, 2023      
Andrew Kennedy Lang(1)            54,688   30,078 
Andrew Kennedy Lang(2)            10,417   5,729 
Anastasia Nyrkovskaya(2)  175,000   125,000   2.85  May 6, 2023      
Anastasia Nyrkovskaya(2)  100,000   200,000   4.10  February 20, 2024      
David L. Cohen, Esq.(2)  66,667   33,333   3.72  July 26, 2022      
David L. Cohen, Esq. (2)  351,666   125,000   3.44  August 8, 2022      
David L. Cohen, Esq. (2)  133,333   66,667   3.18  February 11, 2023      
David L. Cohen, Esq. (2)  33,333   66,667   4.10  February 20, 2024      
David L. Cohen, Esq. (1)            21,875   12,031 
David L. Cohen, Esq. (2)            16,667   9,167 
Alexander R. Berger(1)(3)            295,313   162,422 
Alexander R. Berger(2)(3)            58,333   32,083 

    

Option Awards

    

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

    

    

    

    

    

Number

    

Market

Number

of shares

value

Number

of securities

of units

of shares

of securities

underlying

of stock

of units

underlying

unexercised

that

of stock

unexercised

options

Option

have not

that

options

(#) un-

exercise

Option expiration

vested

have not

Name

(#) exercisable

exercisable

price ($)

date

(#)

vested ($)

Scott R. Milford (1)

 

 

 

2020 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2012 Plan

2,916

30.60

April 20, 2030

2020 Incentive Stock Options from the 2012 Plan

1,605

100.20

September 6, 2030

2020 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

3,210

1,605

100.20

October 28, 2030

2021 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

9,510

9,511

32.20

January 21, 2031

2022 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

1,250

3,750

28.60

April 20, 2032

2023 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

20,625

1,875

8.00

January 5, 2033

Omar A. Haynes (1)

 

 

2020 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2012 Plan

1,666

30.60

April 20, 2030

2021 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

2,717

32.20

April 19, 2024

2022 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

1,250

28.60

April 19, 2024

2023 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

5,000

8.00

April 19, 2024

Ezra T. Ernst (1)

 

Inducement Plan

16,666

33,334

32.80

January 14, 2032

2023 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

3,750

1,250

8.00

January 5, 2033

Suzanne A. Scrabis

2,500

$ 4.56

2023 Non-Qualified Stock Options from the 2020 Plan

937

2,813

4.60

July 10, 2033

(*)The market value is determined by multiplying the number of shares by $0.55, the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ on December 31, 2014, the last day of our fiscal year.
(1)VestsUn-exercisable options vest in equal quarterlyannual increments (6.25% per quarter), subject toover each of the participant's continuous service onremaining anniversaries of the relevant vesting date.
(2)Vests in twelve equal quarterly increments (8.33% per quarter) over the three years, subject to the participant's continuous service on the relevant vesting date.
(3)The consulting agreement with Mr. Berger was terminated on March 13, 2015. As such, these RSUs were forfeited for no consideration.date of grant.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2014

The following table shows information regarding exercises of options to purchase our common stock and vesting of stock awards held by each of our NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards (2) 
Name Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
  Value Realized
on Exercise
($) (1)
  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
  Value Realized
on Vesting
($) (2)
 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e) 
Andrew D. Perlman  76,000   253,080       
Andrew D. Perlman  2,167   6,046       
Andrew D. Perlman  121,833   321,639       
Andrew D. Perlman        58,333   122,354 
Andrew D. Perlman        168,750   353,953 
Andrew Kennedy Lang        31,250   65,547 
Andrew Kennedy Lang        10,417   21,849 
David L. Cohen, Esq.  100,000   57,000       
David L. Cohen, Esq.        12,500   26,219 
David L. Cohen, Esq.        16,667   34,958 
Alexander R. Berger        58,333   122,354 
Alexander R. Berger        168,750   353,953 
Anastasia Nyrkovskaya            

(1) Amounts shown in this column do not necessarily represent actual value realized from the sale of the shares acquired upon exercise of options because in many cases the shares are not sold on exercise but continue to be held by the executive officer exercising the option. The amounts shown represent the difference between the option exercise price and the market price on the date of exercise, which is the amount that would have been realized if the shares had been sold immediately upon exercise.

(2) Shares are related to the vesting of RSU awards which vested evenly on each of March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 and the value realized is calculated by multiplying the number of vested shares by the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ on the applicable vesting date.

Pension Benefits

We do not have any qualified or non-qualifiednonqualified defined benefit plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not have any nonqualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-In-Control

The following summarizes the payments and potential payments to each NEOof our named executive officers as of December 31, 20142023 upon termination or change-in-control. The discussion assumes that such event occurred on December 31, 2014,2023, the last business day of our fiscal year, at which time the closing price of our common stock as listed on NASDAQNasdaq was $0.55 $1.74

14

Table of Contents

per share. For a further discussion of these provisions see the “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” above.

Scott R. Milford

Andrew D. PerlmanAs of January 19, 2024, Mr. Milford is not entitled to any payments upon termination or change-in-control.

Prior to January 19, 2024, in the event Mr. Milford’s employment agreement was terminated for good reason by Mr. Milford, or by the Company without cause and Mr. Milford provided the Company with a release of claims, Mr. Milford was entitled to receive a cash severance payment in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of his then current base salary and one year of COBRA continuation coverage.

Ezra T. Ernst

In the event Mr. Perlman’sErnst’s employment wasagreement is terminated for (i) Good Reasongood reason by Mr. Perlman,Ernst, or (ii) by the Company without Cause on December 31, 2014,cause and Mr. Perlman would have receivedErnst provides the Company with a release of claims, Mr. Ernst shall be entitled to receive a cash severance payment in the amount of one yearhundred percent (100%) of his then current base salary and COBRA payments totaling approximately $40,775. In addition, in the event a change-in-control had occurred on December 31, 2014, Mr. Perlman would have received severance in the amount of one year of base salary, or $400,000, and 75% acceleration of certain unvested RSUs amounting to $145,879 as of December 31, 2014. In addition, upon change-in-control, Mr. Perlman would have been entitled to receive 75% acceleration of certain unvested options which were all out-of-the-money as of December 31, 2014.COBRA continuation coverage.

Andrew Kennedy Lang

In the event Mr. Lang’s employment agreement was terminated by (i) us without Cause, or (ii) by Mr. Lang with Good Reason on December 31, 2014, Mr. Lang would have received severance in the amount of one year of base salary, or $385,000, and COBRA payments totaling approximately $40,775. Upon change-in-control, Mr. Lang would have been entitled to receive 75% acceleration of certain unvested RSUs amounting to $26,856 as of December 31, 2014. In addition, upon change-in-control, Mr. Lang would have been entitled to receive 75% acceleration of certain unvested options which were all out-of-the-money as of December 31, 2014.

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya

Suzanne A. Scrabis

In the event Ms. Nyrkovskaya’sScrabis terminates her employment wasfor good reason, or in the event Ms. Scrabis’ employment is terminated for (i) Good Reason by Ms. Nyrkovskaya, or (ii) by the Company without Cause on December 31, 2014,cause and Ms. Nyrkovskaya would have received severance inScrabis provides the amountCompany with a release of one year of base salary, or $315,000, and COBRA payments totaling approximately $40,775. In addition, upon change-in-control,claims, Ms. Nyrkovskaya would have beenScrabis will be entitled to receive 75% accelerationa payment equal to 50% of certain unvested options which were all out-of-the-money as of December 31, 2014.

David L. Cohen, Esq.

In the event Mr. Cohen’s employment was terminated for (i) Good Reason by Mr. Cohen, or (ii) by the Company without Cause on December 31, 2014, Mr. Cohen would have received severance in the amount of one year ofher then-current base salary, or $315,000, and COBRA payments totaling approximately $40,775. In addition, upon change-in-control, payable in installments over a period of six months.

Omar A. Haynes

Mr. Cohen would have beenHaynes is not entitled to receive 75% acceleration of certain unvested RSUs amounting to $15,898 as of December 31, 2014 and would have been entitled to receive 75% acceleration of certain unvested options which were all out-of-the-money as of December 31, 2014.

Alexander R. Berger

Mr. Berger resigned from the Company on December 19, 2014 and did not receive any payments from the Company in connection with hisupon termination or change-in-control.

15

Table of employment other than the consulting fees in 2015 discussed above. Mr. Berger and the Company also executed a mutual general release of claims that either party has or in the future may have against the other during the period of his employment.Contents

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation of persons who served as non-employee members of our Board of Directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Directors who are employed by us are not compensated for their service on our Board of Directors.2023.

Name 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

($)

  Stock Awards ($) (1)  

Option Awards

($) (1)

  All other compensation ($)  

Total

($)

 
Ashley C. Keller(2)  35,000      255,131      290,131 
Donald E. Stout(3)  35,000      255,131      290,131 
Noel J. Spiegel(4)  35,000      255,131      290,131 
John Engelman(5)  35,000      255,131      290,131 
H. Van Sinclair(6)  35,000      255,131      290,131 

    

Fees

    

    

Earned or

Paid in

Restricted Stock

Option

All Other

Cash

Unit Awards

Awards

Compensation

Total

Name

($)

($)(1)

($)(1)

($)(6)

($)

Bruce T. Bernstein(2)(6)

 

166,250

 

52,200

120,000

 

338,450

Donald E. Stout(3)

 

78,750

 

26,100

 

104,850

Robert Weinstein(4)

105,000

26,100

131,100

Michael Lebowitz(5)

78,750

26,100

104,850

(1)

Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs and option awards granted during the fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.718. See Notes 2(k)2 and 10 of15 to the consolidated financial statements disclosedincluded in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,Original Filing for the assumptions made in the valuation of the equity awards.

(2)As of December 31, 2014,2023, Mr. KellerBernstein held 195,500 fully vested42,511 unexercised options.
(3)As of December 31, 2014,2023, Mr. Stout held 56,250 RSUs and 366,178 options, of which 345,345 options were vested.22,670 unexercised options.
(4)As of December 31, 2014,2023, Mr. SpiegelWeinstein held 180,000 fully vested22,579 unexercised options.
(5)As of December 31, 2014,2023, Mr. EngelmanLebowitz held 56,250 RSUs and 552,500 options of which 531,667 options were vested.21,996 unexercised options.
(6)AsConsists of December 31, 2014, Mr. Sinclair held 56,250 RSUs and 325,000 options$120,000 in cash paid in respect of which 304,167 options were vested.XpresTest, Inc. board services (as described below).

In January 2023, the Board and the Compensation Committee engaged StreeterWyatt Analytics, an independent third-party compensation analyst, to evaluate and make recommendations regard­ing the compensation paid to our directors.

Based on its review, the director compensation program remained the same:

For the Chairman of the Board: $350,000 per year, consisting of:
o$150,000 in cash; and
oequity awards having a combined value of $200,000, consisting of (i) a grant of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase such number of shares of Common Stock having a grant date fair value of $120,000 and (ii) a grant of RSUs of such number of shares having a grant date value of $80,000.
For the other non-employee Directors: $170,000 per year, consisting of:
o$70,000 in cash; and
oequity awards having a combined value of $100,000, consisting of (i) a grant of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase such number of shares of Common Stock having a grant date fair value of $60,000 and (ii) a grant of RSUs of such number of shares having a grant date value of $40,000.
The following additional cash payments:
o$30,000 in cash to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
o$20,000 in cash to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
o$20,000 in cash to each member of the Strategic Affairs Committee.

We reimburse each member of our Board of Directorsdirectors for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendingattendance and participation in Board and committee meetings (including costs of travel, food and lodging).

In addition, Mr. Bernstein received $120,000 in cash compensation in the year ended December 31, 2023 specifically related to the duties, responsibilities and services of Mr. Bernstein beyond the scope of normal Board member services in connection with his role as a non-employee director of XpresTest, which amount was approved in March 2021 following the Board’s review of an analysis and evaluation from StreeterWyatt Analytics of appropriate director compensation specifically related to such duties.  The Board concluded at the time, and continued to conclude, that under the circumstances and in light of the services performed, such compensation represents “ordinary-course compensation” for Mr. Bernstein’s XpresTest board services as a member of the board of directors of XpresTest, and that such compensation therefore would not preclude a determination that Mr. Bernstein would be independent for, among other things,

16

Table of Contents

membership of the Audit Committee of the Company under Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Nasdaq listing rules, as such compensation represents fees for such XpresTest board services.

In September  2023, the Board of Directors.reevaluated the Company’s compensation structure.  Based on its review, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the full Board approved, a new director compensation program effective October 1, 2023:

On February 20, 2014, we granted to each of our non-employee directors 120,000 options at an exercise price of $4.10 per share, which vested evenly over four quarters, beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2014, and agreed to pay each director an annual cash retainer of $35,000 payable quarterly in arrears.

For 2015, we continue to pay our non-employee directors a cash retainer of $35,000 payable quarterly in arrears. On January 22, 2015, we granted to each of our non-employee directors 100,000 options at the exercise price of $0.59 per share that vest evenly over four quarters, beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

21For the Chairman of the Board:
o$75,000 in cash
For the other non-employee Directors:
o$35,000 in cash
The following additional cash payments:
o$10,000 in cash to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
o$10,000 in cash to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
o$20,000 in cash to each member of the Strategic Affairs Committee.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain aggregate information, as of December 31, 2014,2023 with respect to all of our equity compensation plans then in effect:

Plan Category 

(a)

  

No. of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

(b)

  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($)

  

(c)

  

No. of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in

column (a))

 
Total equity compensation plans approved by
security holders (1),(2)
  9,207,524  $3.37   5,793,420 
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders (3)
  41,178  $0.99    

    

    

    

No. of securities

remaining

available for

No. of securities

future issuance

to be issued upon

Weighted-

under equity

exercise of

average exercise

compensation

outstanding

price of

plans (excluding

options,

outstanding

securities

warrants and

options, warrants

reflected in

Plan Category

rights

and rights ($)

the first column)

Total equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

 

353,149

$

25.75

 

249,899

(1)These plans consist solely of the 20122020 Plan, as approved by our Board of Directors in September 2020 and by our stockholders in October 2020. On October 4, 2022, shareholders approved the 2006 Plan.amendment to the Company’s 2020 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by 375,000 shares of Common Stock to an aggregate of 625,000 shares. Under the 20122020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”), a maximum of 15,600,000249,899 shares of common stock may be awarded. The 2012 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders on July 19, 2012, following the Merger, replacing Vringo’s then existing 2006 Plan. The maximum numberCommon Stock remained available for issuance as of available common shares under the 2012 Plan is made up of the 9,100,000 previously available common shares under the 2006 Plan and 6,500,000 newly available common shares.December 31, 2023.

(2)The numbers of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding equities are 8,229,357 and 978,167, respectively for the 2012 Plan and the 2006 Plan. The weighted-average exercise prices of outstanding options are $3.49 and $2.47, respectively for the 2012 Plan and the 2006 Plan.

(3)This plan consists of Innovate/Protect’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan assumed by the Company in connection with the merger, which provided for incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stocks, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards and performance compensation awards to be issued to directors, officers, managers, employees, consultants and advisors of Innovate/Protect and its affiliates, as defined in the plan. As of the merger, no further issuances can be made under this plan and any forfeitures cannot be reused.

17

Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 17, 201529, 2024, for (a) each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of our common stockvoting securities, (b) each of our NEOs,named executive officers, (c) each of our directors, and (d) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. We deem shares of common stock that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days of April 17, 201529, 2024, pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants andor the vesting of RSUs, as applicable, to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group. However, such shares of common stock aregroup, but not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table.

Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the stockholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown to be beneficially owned by them based on information provided to us by these stockholders. Percentage of ownership is based on 93,571,0424,183,435 shares of common stock issued and outstanding onas of April 17, 2015.29, 2024.

       
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership  Percent of Class 

Five percent or more beneficial owners: 

        
         

Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.(2)

777 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10017

  6,157,248   6.2%
         

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

  5,407,879   5.8%

Directors and named executive officers:

        
         
Andrew Kennedy Lang(4)  7,408,316   7.9%
Andrew D. Perlman(5)  2,670,582   2.8%
Alexander R. Berger(6)  1,843,599   2.0%
Donald E. Stout(7)  1,539,696   1.6%
John Engelman(8)  755,068   * 
H. Van Sinclair(9)  636,663   * 
David L. Cohen, Esq.(10)  768,333   * 
Anastasia Nyrkovskaya(11)  341,000   * 
Noel J. Spiegel(12)  280,000   * 
Ashley C. Keller(13)  230,500   * 
All current directors and officers as a group (9 individuals)(14):  14,630,158   14.8%

    

Number of 

    

Percent of  

Shares of 

Shares of  

Common 

Common 

Stock 

Stock  

Beneficially

Beneficially

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)

 Owned

 Owned

5% percent or more beneficial owners:

None

Directors and named executive officers:

 

 

  

Scott R. Milford(2)

59,055

*

Suzanne A. Scrabis(3)

17,812

*

Ezra T. Ernst(4)

49,463

*

Bruce T. Bernstein(5)

 

81,467

 

1.9%

Donald E. Stout(6)

 

30,634

 

*

Robert Weinstein(7)

 

30,403

 

*

Michael Lebowitz(8)

 

34,970

 

*

Omar T. Haynes(9)

6,693

*

All current directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals)(10):

 

310,498

 

7.4%

*

Less than 1%

(1)Unless otherwise indicated in the footnote below, the business address of the individuals in the table above is c/o VringoXWELL, Inc., 780 3rd Ave. 12th254 West 31st Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10017.10001.
(2)Based on our records, consists of warrants to purchase up to 6,157,248 shares of our common stock that are exercisable within the next 60 days. In accordance with the terms of the warrants, Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. may not exercise its warrants to purchase our common stock to the extent that after giving effect to such conversion or exercise, as the case may be, Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. (together with its affiliates) would have acquired, through the exercise of Vringo warrants or otherwise, beneficial ownership of aThe number of shares of our common stock that exceeds 9.99% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise, excluding for purposes of such determination, shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants that have not been exercised. Hudson Bay Capital Management, L.P., the investment manager of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., has voting and investment power over these securities. 
(3)Based on Form SC 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. on February 2, 2015.

(4)Includes options to purchase 312,500 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 2,052,419 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days. 2,344,509 shares and 965,039 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are held by Innovation Spring LLC. Innovation Spring Trust is the sole member and the 100% owner of Innovation Spring LLC. Andrew C. Lang, the father of Mr. Andrew Kennedy Lang, has the sole power to vote or direct the vote over the shares held by Innovation Spring LLC. Mr. Andrew Kennedy Lang does not have power to vote or direct the vote over the 3,309,548 shares held by Innovation Spring LLC.
(5)Includes options to purchase 2,251,917 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days.
(6)Includes warrants to purchase 545,621 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days.
(7)Includes options to purchase 391,178 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 302,203 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days. 733,815beneficially owned includes 2,058 shares of common stock and 302,203 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are held by the Donald E. and Mary Stout Trust.
(8)Includes options to purchase 577,50056,997 shares of ourcommon stock, which are exercisable within 60 days of April 29, 2024.
(3)The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 5,000 RSUs and options to purchase 12,812 shares of common stock, which are exercisable within 60 days of April 29, 2024.
(4)The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 1,130 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 28,492 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days.
(9)Includes options to purchase 350,00048,333 shares of ourcommon stock, which are exercisable within 60 days of April 29, 2024.
(5)The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 38,956 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 49,709 shares of our common stock exercisable within the next 60 days.
(10)Includes options to purchase 726,66642,511 shares of our common stock, which are exercisable within the next 60 days. days of April 29, 2024.
(6)
(11)IncludesThe number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 7,974 shares of common stock and options to purchase 325,00022,660 shares of our common stock, which are exercisable within the next 60 days. days of April 29, 2024.

18

Table of Contents

(7)
(12)IncludesThe number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 7,824 shares of common stock and options to purchase 205,00022,579 shares of our common stock, which are exercisable within the next 60 days. days of April 29, 2024.
(8)
(13)IncludesThe number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 12,974 vested shares of common stock and options to purchase 220,50021,996 shares of our common stock, which are exercisable within the next 60 days. days of April 29, 2024.
(9)The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes 5,027 shares of common stock and RSUs and options to purchase 1,666 shares of common stock, which are exercisable within 60 days of April 29, 2024.
(14)(10)See footnotes (4), (5) and (7) – (13)(2) through (9).

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Related Person Transactions Approval Policy

All related party transactions must be approved by our audit committeeAudit Committee or a majority of our independent directors who do not have an interest in the transaction and who will have access, at our expense, to our independent legal counsel.

Transactions with Related Persons

None.

There were no related party transactions to report during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Director Independence and Committee Qualifications

Our Board of Directors has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with Vringo,us, either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, we believe that Messrs. Sinclair, Engelman, Stout, KellerBernstein, Weinstein, Lebowitz and SpiegelMme. Wizenberg qualify as independent directors in accordance with the standards set by NASDAQ,Nasdaq, as well as Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”).Act. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent directors as required by NASDAQNasdaq rules. TheOur Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the CompensationAudit Committee, the AuditCompensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements applicable to each such committee member prescribed by NASDAQNasdaq and the SEC. TheOur Board of Directors has further determined that Messrs. SpiegelBernstein and SinclairWeinstein are “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the rules of the SEC.

19

Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

KPMGOn May 4, 2020, we approved the engagement of Friedman LLP was selected by our Audit Committee(“Friedman”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2020. This selection was ratified by our stockholders.stockholders at the 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 annual meetings held on October 28, 2020, September 30, 2021 October 4, 2022 and August 22, 2023. In deciding to select KPMG LLP,Friedman, the Audit Committee carefully considered the qualifications of KPMG LLP,Friedman, including itstheir reputation for integrity, quality, and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing. Effective September 1, 2022, Friedman combined with Marcum LLP (“Marcum”), and Marcum became our auditors as of October 4, 2022, following the approval of their engagement by our Audit Committee. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed auditor independence issues and existing commercial relationships with KPMG LLP.Marcum. The Audit Committee concluded that KPMG LLP’s independence of Marcum was not impaired for the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2014. Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International (“KPMG Israel”), served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

2023, and 2022. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142023, and 2013,2022, we incurred the following fees for the services of KPMG LLP and KPMG Israel.Marcum:

  2014  2013 
Audit fees:(1) $412,500   187,000 
Tax fees:(2)  25,000   8,000 
Total $437,500  $195,000 

    

2023

    

2022

Marcum:

Audit fees(1)

$

567,070

$

410,025

Audit-related fees(2)

120,915

80,242

Tax fees(3)

All other fees(4)

Total

$

687,985

$

490,267

(1)This categoryAudit fees includes fees associated with the annual audits of our financial statements, quarterly reviews of our financial statements, and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The fees of $412,500 in 2014 were incurred by KPMG LLP and the fees of $187,000 in 2013 were incurred by KPMG Israel.
(2)Audit-related fees includes fees for benefit plan audits and lease compliance audits.
(3)Tax fees represent the aggregateconsist of fees for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planningplanning.
(4)The fees in this category pertain to fees billed for products and services provided by KPMG Israel related to our Israeli subsidiary.Marcum, other than the services reported in the categories above.

Pre-Approval ofPolicies and Procedures Audit and Non-Audit Services

Consistent with SEC policies and guidelines regarding audit independence, theour Audit Committee is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm on a case-by-case basis. Our Audit Committee has established a policy regarding approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category and service. Our Audit Committee has pre-approved all of the services provided by our independent registered public accounting firms in 2014for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2013.2022.

20

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15:

 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The(a)(1)

No financial statements financial statement schedules and exhibits listed in the exhibit indexare filed with this Amendment No. 2. These items were included as part of the Original Filing and theFiling.

(a)(2)

None.

(a)(3) Exhibits.

The following exhibits listed in the exhibit index of this Form 10-K/A are filed with,as part of, or incorporated by reference in,into, this Form 10-K/A.Amendment No. 2 to the Original Filing.

Exhibits Index

Exhibit 
No.

Description

31.1*

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act, Rules 13a – 14(a) and 15d – 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act, Rules 13a – 14(a) and 15d – 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL documents)

*

Filed herewith.

21

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York of New York on the 30th29th day of April 2015.2024.

VRINGO, INC.

XWELL, INC.

By:

/s/ Andrew D. Perlman

Name:

By:

Andrew D. Perlman

/s/ Scott R. Milford

Title:

Name:

Scott R Milford

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit
Number

By:

Exhibit Description/s/ Suzanne A. Scrabis

Name:

Suzanne A. Scrabis

31.1

Title:

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
31.2Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer

28

22