UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


Form10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

2020

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number001-32641


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

20-3068069

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Delaware20-3068069
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
111 Westwood Place,Suite 400,Brentwood,Brentwood,TennesseeTennessee37027
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’sRegistrant's telephone number including area code(615)(615) 221-2250


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per ShareBKDBKDNew York Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No

¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated" "accelerated filer,” “smaller" "smaller reporting company," and “emerging"emerging growth company”company" in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  

Accelerated filer  

Non-accelerated filer  

Smaller reporting company  

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

¨





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act). Yes No


The aggregate market value of common stock held bynon-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2019,30, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’sregistrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $1.4 billion.$545 million. The market value calculation was determined using a per share price of $7.21,$2.95, the price at which the registrant’sregistrant's common stock was last sold on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. For purposes of this calculation only, shares held bynon-affiliates excludes only those shares beneficially owned by the registrant’s executive officers, directors and stockholders owning 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock.


As of April 24, 2020, 183,164,490February 22, 2021, 183,461,665 shares of the registrant’sregistrant's common stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding (excluding unvested restricted shares and restricted stock units)shares).


Explanatory Note

This Amendment No. 1 on

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain sections of the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or an amendment to this Form10-K/A (this “Amendment”) amends 10-K, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2020, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




TABLE OF CONTENTS
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.

FORM 10-K for Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (“Brookdale,” the “Company,” “we,” or “our”) for the fiscal year ended December

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 19, 2020 (the “Original Filing”).

We are filing this Amendment to include the information required by Part III and not included in the Original Filing, as we will not file our definitive proxy statement within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The reference on the cover page of the Original Filing to our incorporation by reference of certain sections of our definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Filing is hereby deleted.

Except as set forth in Part III below and the updates to the List of Exhibits, no other changes are made to the Original Filing. The Original Filing continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing. Unless expressly stated, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Filing, nor does it modify or update in any way the disclosures contained in the Original Filing. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Filing and our other filings with the SEC.

Table of Contents

Part IIIPAGE

PART I

Item 10. 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
PART II
Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Item 8
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B
PART III
Item 103

Item 11. 11

11

Item 12. 12

49

Item 13. 13

52

Item 14. 14

53
Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

55
Appendix A – Reconciliations ofNon-GAAP Financial MeasuresA-1

2        PART IV

Item 15
Item 16


3

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers


SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and Corporate Governance.

Information Concerning Directors

The Company’s Boarduncertainties and include all statements that are not historical statements of Directors (the “Board”) consistsfact and those regarding our intent, belief or expectations. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of nine directorsforward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "potential," "intend," "expect," "endeavor," "seek," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "project," "predict," "continue," "plan," "target," or other similar words or expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations, and our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is currently divided into three classes. Weinherently uncertain. Although we believe that expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our assumptions or expectations will be attained and actual results and performance could differ materially from those projected. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects or which could cause events or circumstances to differ from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the response efforts of federal, state, and local government authorities, businesses, individuals, and us on our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and our strategic initiatives, including plans for future growth, which will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including the duration, severity, and breadth of the pandemic and any resurgence of the disease, the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s economy and debt and equity markets and the local economies in our markets, the development, availability, utilization, and efficacy of COVID-19 testing, therapeutic agents, and vaccines and the prioritization of such resources among businesses and demographic groups, government financial and regulatory relief efforts that may become available to business and individuals, including our ability to qualify for and satisfy the terms and conditions of financial relief, perceptions regarding the safety of senior living communities during and after the pandemic, changes in demand for senior living communities and our ability to adapt our sales and marketing efforts to meet that demand, the impact of COVID-19 on our residents’ and their families’ ability to afford our resident fees, including due to changes in unemployment rates, consumer confidence, housing markets, and equity markets caused by COVID-19, changes in the processacuity levels of declassifyingour new residents, the Board usingdisproportionate impact of COVID-19 on seniors generally and those residing in our communities, the duration and costs of our response efforts, including increased equipment, supplies, labor, litigation, testing, vaccination clinic, and other expenses, the impact of COVID-19 on our ability to complete financings, refinancings, or other transactions (including dispositions and our pending Health Care Services transaction) or to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments and to satisfy financial and other covenants in our debt and lease documents, increased regulatory requirements, including unfunded, mandatory testing, increased enforcement actions resulting from COVID-19, government action that may limit our collection or discharge efforts for delinquent accounts, and the frequency and magnitude of legal actions and liability claims that may arise due to COVID-19 or our response efforts; events which adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford resident fees, including downturns in the economy, housing market, consumer confidence, or the equity markets and unemployment among resident family members; changes in reimbursement rates, methods, or timing under governmental reimbursement programs including the Medicare and Medicaid programs; the impact of ongoing healthcare reform efforts; the effects of senior housing construction and development, lower industry occupancy (including due to the pandemic), and increased competition; conditions of housing markets, regulatory changes, acts of nature, and the effects of climate change in geographic areas where we are concentrated; terminations of our resident agreements and vacancies in the living spaces we lease, including due to the pandemic; limits on our ability to use net operating loss carryovers to reduce future tax payments; failure to maintain the security and functionality of our information systems, to prevent a phased approachcybersecurity attack or breach, or to comply with applicable privacy and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA; our ability to complete our capital expenditures in accordance with our plans; our ability to identify and pursue development, investment and acquisition opportunities and our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions; competition for the acquisition of assets; our ability to complete pending or expected disposition, acquisition, or other transactions (including our pending Health Care Services transaction) on agreed upon terms or at all, including in respect of the satisfaction of closing conditions, the risk that regulatory approvals are not obtained or are subject to unanticipated conditions, and uncertainties as to the timing of closing, and our ability to identify and pursue any such opportunities in the future; risks related to the implementation of our strategy, including initiatives undertaken to execute on our strategic priorities and their effect on our results; delays in obtaining regulatory approvals; disruptions in the financial markets or decreases in the appraised values or performance of our communities that affect our ability to obtain financing or extend or refinance debt as it matures and our financing costs; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and long-term lease payments and to fund our planned capital projects; the effect of our non-compliance with any of our debt or lease agreements (including the financial covenants contained therein), including the risk of lenders or lessors declaring a cross default in the event of our non-compliance with any such agreements and the risk of loss of our property securing leases and indebtedness due to any resulting lease terminations and foreclosure actions; the effect of our indebtedness and long-term leases on our liquidity; the potential phasing out of LIBOR which may increase the costs of our debt obligations; our ability to obtain additional capital on terms acceptable to us; departures of key officers and potential disruption caused by changes in management; increased competition for or a shortage of personnel (including due to the pandemic), wage pressures resulting from increased competition, low unemployment levels, minimum wage increases and changes in overtime laws, and union activity; environmental contamination at any of our communities; failure to comply with existing environmental laws; an adverse determination or resolution of complaints filed against us, including class action and stockholder derivative complaints; the cost and difficulty of complying with increasing and evolving regulation; costs to respond to, and adverse determinations resulting from, government reviews, audits and investigations; unanticipated costs to comply with legislative or regulatory developments; the risks associated with current global economic conditions and general economic factors such as inflation, the consumer price index, commodity costs, fuel and other energy costs, costs of salaries, wages, benefits, and insurance, interest rates, and tax rates; the impact of seasonal contagious illness or an outbreak of COVID-19 or other contagious disease in the markets in which we operate; actions of activist stockholders, including a proxy contest; as well as other risks detailed from

4


time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those set forth under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in such SEC filings. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's views as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and, except as required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Our business faces significant risks and uncertainties. You should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors set forth under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in addition to other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. The following is a summary of the principal risks that could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and future prospects.

The COVID-19 pandemic, including the response efforts of federal, state, and local government authorities, businesses, individuals and us, has adversely impacted, and likely will continue to adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and stock price, and such impacts may be material. The ultimate impacts of COVID-19 on our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and stock price will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including those set forth in amendments“Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Due to the dependency of our revenues on private pay sources, events which adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford our resident fees (including downturns in the economy, housing market, consumer confidence, or the equity markets and unemployment among resident family members) could cause our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow to decline.
Changes in the reimbursement rates, methods, or timing of payment from government reimbursement programs could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.
The impact of ongoing healthcare reform efforts on our business cannot accurately be predicted.
Senior housing construction and development, lower industry occupancy (including due to pandemic), and increased competition, may have an adverse effect on our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.
The geographic concentration of our communities could leave us vulnerable to an economic downturn, regulatory changes, acts of nature, or the effects of climate change in those areas, which could negatively impact our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.
Termination of our resident agreements and vacancies in the living spaces we lease, including due to the pandemic, could adversely affect our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.
Our ability to use net operating loss carryovers to reduce future tax payments may be limited.
Failure to maintain the security and functionality of our information systems and data, to prevent a cybersecurity attack or breach, or to comply with applicable privacy and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA, could adversely affect our business, reputation, and relationships with our residents, patients, employees, and referral sources and subject us to remediation costs, government inquiries, and liabilities, any of which could materially and adversely impact our revenues, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity.
Failure to complete our capital expenditures in accordance with our plans may adversely affect our anticipated revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.
To the extent we identify and pursue any future development, investment, or acquisition opportunities, we may encounter difficulties in identifying opportunities at attractive prices or integrating acquisitions with our operations, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Competition for the acquisition of strategic assets from buyers with greater financial resources or lower costs of capital than us or that have lower return expectations than we do could limit our ability to compete for strategic acquisitions and therefore to grow our business effectively.
Pending disposition transactions are, and any future disposition transactions will be, subject to various closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals where applicable, likely will result in reductions to our Certificaterevenue and may negatively impact our results of Incorporation approvedoperations and cash flow.
The closing of the pending sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment may not be completed in accordance with our expectations or at all, and may not generate cash proceeds to us in the amount we anticipate, and the pending sale may disrupt our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Our execution of our strategy may not be successful, and initiatives undertaken to execute on our strategic priorities may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the price of our common stock.
5


Disruptions in the financial markets or decreases in the appraised values or performance of our communities could affect our ability to obtain financing or to extend or refinance debt as it matures, which could negatively impact our liquidity, financial condition, and the market price of our common stock.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments, this could result in defaults of the related debt or leases and cross-defaults under our other debt or lease documents, which would adversely affect our capital structure, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Our indebtedness and long-term leases could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to operate our business.
Our debt and lease documents contain financial and other covenants, and any default under such documents could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness and lease obligations, the foreclosure of our mortgaged communities, the termination of our leasehold interests, and/or cross-defaults under our other debt or lease documents, any of which could materially and adversely impact our capital structure, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity and interfere with our ability to pursue our strategy.
Lease obligations and mortgage debt expose us to increased risk of loss of property, which could harm our ability to generate future revenues and could have an adverse tax effect.
Increases in market interest rates could significantly increase the costs of our debt obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
We may need additional capital to fund our operations, capital expenditure plans, and strategic priorities, and we may not be able to obtain it on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
The transition of management or unexpected departure of our key officers could harm our business.
Increased competition for, or a shortage of, personnel (including due to the pandemic), wage pressures resulting from increased competition, low unemployment levels, increased unemployment benefits, minimum wage increases, changes in overtime laws, and union activity may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flow.
Environmental contamination at any of our communities could result in substantial liabilities to us, which may exceed the value of the underlying assets and which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Failure to comply with existing environmental laws could result in increased expenditures, litigation, and potential loss to our business and in our asset value, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Significant legal actions and liability claims against us, including class action and stockholder derivative complaints, could subject us to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We face periodic and routine reviews, audits, and investigations by government agencies, and any adverse findings could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
The cost and difficulty of complying with increasing and evolving regulation and enforcement could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and cash flow.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act, safety and health standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other fire, safety, health, and other regulations may require us to make unanticipated expenditures, which could increase our costs and therefore adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents may delay, deter, or prevent a tender offer, merger, or acquisition that investors may consider favorable.
We are a holding company with no operations and rely on our operating subsidiaries to provide us with funds necessary to meet our financial obligations.
Various factors, including general economic conditions and the spread of contagious illnesses, could adversely affect our financial performance and other aspects of our business.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our stockholders.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Actions of activist stockholders could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management's attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow, and the market price of our common stock.
6


PART I

Item 1.    Business

Unless otherwise specified, references to "Brookdale," "we," "us," "our," or "the Company" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K mean Brookdale Senior Living Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

Our Business

As of December 31, 2020, we are the largest operator of senior living communities in the United States based on total capacity, with 726 communities in 43 states and the ability to serve approximately 64,000 residents. We offer our residents access to a broad continuum of services across     the most attractive sectors of the senior living industry. We operate and manage independent living, assisted living, memory care, and continuing care retirement communities ("CCRCs"). We also offer a range of home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to more than 17,000 patients as of that date.

Our community and service offerings combine housing with hospitality and healthcare services. Our senior living communities offer residents a supportive home-like setting, assistance with activities of daily living ("ADLs") such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring/walking, and, in certain communities, licensed skilled nursing services. We also provide home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to residents of many of our communities and to seniors living outside of our communities. By providing residents with a range of service options as their needs change, we provide greater continuity of care, enabling seniors to age-in-place, which we believe enables them to maintain residency with us for a longer period of time. The ability of residents to age-in-place is also beneficial to our residents and their families who are concerned with care decisions for their elderly relatives.

Strategy

Our goal is to be the first choice in senior living by being the nation's most trusted and effective senior living provider and employer. We believe there are significant opportunities to create and deliver stockholder value as we execute on our strategy to achieve this goal. We continue to execute our core operational strategy that we initiated in early 2018, and we believe successful execution on that strategy provides the best opportunity for us to navigate and recover from the pandemic and to create stockholder value. We have supplemented our operational strategy with initiatives intended to complement and enhance our core operational efforts and to position us for future growth and success as we encounter changes and trends in demographics, customer preferences, technology, and healthcare delivery and outcomes. Our refined strategy is focused on these priorities:

Continued Operational Improvement and Efficiency. We are focused on our core senior living communities and intend to continue to drive operational improvements. Through our "win locally" initiative, we intend to provide choices for high quality care and personalized service by caring associates while leveraging our industry-leading scale and experience. Such efforts include optimizing our sales and marketing processes, prioritizing communities with the most opportunities for growth, and ensuring that our communities and their programming are competitive in the market. We also continue to focus on attracting, engaging, developing, and retaining the best associates by maintaining a compelling value proposition in the areas of leadership, career development, and meaningful work. We believe engaged associates lead to lower turnover, improved operations, and ultimately an enhanced resident experience that drives accelerated growth. To sharpen our focus on our core senior living operations, we are (and have been) executing on initiatives to reduce the complexity of our business and to ensure appropriate risk-reward tradeoffs in our highly regulated product lines. Such initiatives include exiting substantially all our entry fee CCRC business in 2020 (which also significantly reduced the number of skilled nursing facilities we operate) and continuing to optimize our management services business.

Senior Living Portfolio. Since initiating our operational turnaround strategy in early 2018, we have continued our portfolio optimization initiative through which we have disposed of owned and leased communities and restructured leases. Such transactions have included restructuring our leases with our three largest landlords, sales and conveyance of owned communities, and dispositions of substantially all of our remaining ownership interests in unconsolidated ventures, including our entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak Properties, Inc. ("Healthpeak"). As we move forward in 2021, we intend to continue to (i) expand our footprint and services in core markets where we have, or can achieve, a clear leadership position, (ii) execute an ongoing capital recycling program through acquiring leased or managed communities and exiting underperforming owned assets or leases when possible, and (iii) pivot back to portfolio growth through targeted development, investment, and acquisition opportunities. We will continue to invest in our development capital expenditures program through which we expand, renovate, reposition, and redevelop selected existing senior living communities where economically advantageous, although at a reduced pace during the pandemic.
7



Expansion of Healthcare and Service Platform. Our vision is to enable those we serve to live well by offering our residents the highest-quality healthcare and wellness platform in the senior living industry. We intend to further integrate our healthcare service model in certain markets in 2021. We also intend to pursue initiatives designed to accelerate growth in our healthcare services offered to residents within our communities and private duty services business. Such initiatives may include implementation of improvements to our sales and marketing efforts associated with our healthcare services, pursuit of additional or expanded relationships with managed care providers, and further development of healthcare relationships to capitalize on growth opportunities. We believe the successful execution of these initiatives and our healthcare strategy will drive incremental revenue by increasing move-ins, improving resident health and wellbeing, and as a result extend residents' average length of stay and increase occupancy. We also believe that we will improve the results of operations as we further develop as a partner of choice for healthcare service or payor organizations seeking to provide services within our communities and/or improve health outcomes at an overall lower cost of care.

Driving Innovation and Leveraging Technology. We are engaged in a variety of innovation initiatives and over time plan to pilot and test new ideas, technologies, and operating models in order to enhance our residents' engagement and experience, improve outcomes, and increase average length of stay and occupancy. With our technology platform, we also expect to identify solutions to reduce complexity, increase productivity, lower costs, and increase our ability to collaborate with third parties.

Recent Developments

COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and likely will continue to adversely impact the senior living industry and our business. Due to the average age and prevalence of chronic medical conditions among our residents and patients, they generally are at disproportionately higher risk of hospitalization and adverse outcomes if they contract COVID-19. We continue to serve and care for seniors at our communities and their homes through the pandemic. A significant portion of our corporate support associates have worked from home since March 2020.

The health and wellbeing of our residents, patients, and associates is and has been our highest priority. We initiated our COVID-19 preparation efforts in January 2020. Our response efforts center on infection prevention and control protocols, including following requirements and guidance of federal, state, and local governments and agencies, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") and U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"). We have enhanced and reinforced training our associates in such protocols and continue to actively monitor government requirements and guidance and adapt our policies, procedures, and response efforts when applicable. Upon confirmation of positive COVID-19 exposure at a community, we take actions intended to minimize further exposure, including associates' adhering to personal protection protocols, isolating residents or finding placement in an alternate care setting to best address their care needs, and in some cases, restricting new resident admissions, as directed by local health authorities.

Seeking to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into our communities, and to help control further exposure to infections within communities, in March 2020 we began restricting visitors at all our communities to essential healthcare personnel and certain compassionate care situations, screening associates and permitted visitors, suspending group outings, modifying communal dining and programming to comply with social distancing guidelines and, in most cases, implementing in-room only dining and activities programming, requesting that residents refrain from leaving the community unless medically necessary, and requiring new residents and residents returning from a hospital or nursing home to isolate in their apartment for fourteen days. These restrictions were in place across our portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2020. We have adopted a framework for determining when to ease restrictions at each of our communities based on several criteria, including regulatory requirements and guidance, completion of baseline testing at the 2018community, and 2019the presence of current confirmed positive COVID-19 cases. Under this framework, we began easing restrictions on a community-by-community basis in July 2020 where regulatory requirements and guidance allowed, which easing may have included permitting outdoor, and in some cases, indoor visits with families, reduced capacity or socially distanced communal dining, limited communal activities programming, and in-person prospective resident visits. Although we are hopeful that administration of the vaccine to our residents and associates will enable us to further ease restrictions at our communities, those restrictions may continue for some time, and we may revert to more restrictive measures if the pandemic worsens, as necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, or at the direction of state or local health authorities.

In April 2020, we proactively commenced a resident and associate testing program for our communities. We undertook the program to identify positive, including asymptomatic, individuals, to better understand how our infection protocols are working, to help minimize the exposure to residents and associates of someone known to be COVID-19 positive, and in some cases to comply with state and local testing requirements. In July 2020, we completed baseline testing at all of our communities,
8


and we have continued testing residents and associates at many of our communities. We also continue to utilize rapid point of care antigen test kits supplied by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") at those of our communities with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments ("CLIA") waivers. Our testing program has accumulated approximately 320,000 test results. Approximately 1.2% of our residents were known to have current COVID-19 positive test results on February 22, 2021. Further testing, whether undertaken proactively, as a result of regulatory requirements, or at the direction of state or local health authorities, may result in significant additional expense, additional temporary restrictions on move-ins at affected communities, continued need for isolating positive residents, increased use of personal protective equipment ("PPE") by our associates, and increased employee-related costs.

In December 2020, two COVID-19 vaccines received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We elected to work with CVS Health Corporation, with whom we have a longstanding relationship to provide flu shot clinics in our communities, to administer vaccinations on site to our eligible residents and associates through the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program offered through the CDC. Our work to prepare for and host vaccine clinics includes extensive planning, gathering insurance information, obtaining consents, scheduling appointments, holding educational sessions with residents, families, and associates and detailed coordination of traffic flow and observation areas. We hosted our first clinics on December 18, 2020 and by January 22, 2021 had hosted over 500 community vaccine clinics. As of February 22, 2021, first dose vaccine clinics had been completed for residents and associates at 100% of our communities and approximately 85% of our communities have had second dose vaccine clinics.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, have significantly disrupted demand for senior living communities and the sales process, which typically includes in-person prospective resident visits within communities. We believe potential residents and their families are more cautious regarding moving into senior living communities while the pandemic continues, and such caution may persist for some time. In response to these developments, we have redesigned our sales process to include virtual tours, video engagement, and outdoor prospective resident meetings, enhanced and adapted our marketing programs to address the social distancing environment, and sought to strengthen our relationships with referral sources. During the third quarter of 2020, we returned to using in-person prospective resident visits for a majority of our communities. However, several large markets continue with virtual-only prospective resident visits as of December 31, 2020. We have placed restrictions on move-ins at our communities when circumstances warrant, including at the direction of state or local health authorities. Although these restrictions began to ease considerably in August 2020, restrictions on move-ins escalated throughout the fourth quarter of 2020 due to the resurgence of the virus. At the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020, 86%, 98%, and 89% of our communities, respectively, were accepting new move-ins. As of February 22, 2021, 97% of our communities were accepting new move-ins. We cannot predict with reasonable certainty whether or when demand for senior living communities will return to pre-COVID-19 levels or the extent to which the pandemic’s effect on demand may adversely affect the amount of resident fees we are able to collect from our residents.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, began to adversely impact our occupancy and resident fee revenue significantly during March 2020, as new resident leads, visits (including virtual visits), and move-in activity declined significantly compared to typical levels. The year-over-year decrease in monthly move-ins of our same community portfolio has moderated from 64.2% in April 2020 to 26.5% in December 2020. Our consolidated senior housing portfolio's weighted average occupancy has declined in each month of the pandemic, from 82.7% in March 2020 to 71.5% in December 2020, and was 70.0% in January 2021. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $281.1 million of lost resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, including $228.5 million of lost resident fee revenue in our consolidated senior housing portfolio. Further deterioration of our resident fee revenue will result from lower move-in activity and the resident attrition inherent in our business, which may increase due to the impacts of COVID-19. Our home health average daily census also began to decrease in March 2020 due to lower occupancy in our communities and fewer elective medical procedures and hospital discharges, resulting in a 14.6% year-over-year decline in home health average daily census for the year ended December 31, 2020. We expect home health average daily census to continue to gradually recover sequentially with increased elective medical procedures and hospital discharges and senior housing occupancy. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $52.6 million of lost resident fee revenue for the Health Care Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Facility operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $125.5 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the pandemic, including costs for: acquisition of additional PPE, medical equipment, and cleaning and disposable food service supplies; enhanced cleaning and environmental sanitation; increased employee-related costs, including labor, workers compensation, and health plan expense; increased expense for general liability claims; and COVID-19 testing of residents and associates where not otherwise covered by government payor or third-party insurance sources. We are not able to reasonably predict the total amount of costs we will incur related to the pandemic, and such costs may continue to be substantial. We also recorded non-cash impairment charges in our operating results of $105.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 for our operating lease right-of-use assets and property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected operating performance at communities with impaired assets.

9


We have taken, and continue to take, actions to enhance and preserve our liquidity in response to the pandemic. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we completed our financing plans in the regular course of business, including refinancing substantially all of our 2020 and 2021 maturities. In addition, on August 31, 2020, we terminated our $250 million revolving credit facility and obtained $266.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing on 16 communities, most of which had secured the credit facility prior to its termination. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants under the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund ("Provider Relief Fund") and $87.5 million of accelerated/advanced Medicare payments, and we deferred $72.7 million of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes. These programs were created or expanded under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 ("CARES Act"), as described below. We also delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects, resulting in an approximate $67 million reduction to our pre-pandemic full-year 2020 capital expenditure plans, and suspended repurchases under our existing share repurchase program. On July 26, 2020, we restructured our 120 community triple-net master lease with Ventas, Inc. ("Ventas") in a multipart transaction. The components included, among other things, reducing our initial annual minimum rent to $100 million, representing a reduction of approximately $86 million over the twelve months ending June 30, 2021, and removal of the prior requirements that we satisfy financial covenants and maintain a security deposit with Ventas. We paid a $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, our total liquidity was $575.5 million, consisting of $380.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, $172.9 million of marketable securities, and $22.2 million of availability on our secured credit facility. We continue to seek opportunities to enhance and preserve our liquidity, including through maintaining expense discipline, continuing to evaluate our financing structure and the state of debt markets, seeking further government-sponsored financial relief related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and completing the pending sale of 80% of the equity in our Health Care Services segment. There is no assurance that debt financing will continue to be available on terms consistent with our expectations or at all, that our efforts will be successful in seeking further government-sponsored financial relief or regarding the amount of, or conditions required to qualify for, any such relief, or that the closing of the pending transaction will be completed in accordance with our expectations, or at all, or generate cash proceeds to us in the amount we anticipate.

The CARES Act, signed into law on March 27, 2020, and Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, signed into law on April 24, 2020, provide liquidity and financial relief to certain businesses, among other things. The impacts to us of certain provisions of the CARES Act are summarized below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants from the Provider Relief Fund under which grants have been made available to eligible healthcare providers for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. The accepted grants were made available pursuant to the following distributions from the Provider Relief Fund:

$101.7 million pursuant to General Distributions, with the aggregate amount ultimately determined based on a percentage of our year-over-year changes in patient care revenue and certain operating and other expenses for the first and second quarters of 2020.

$4.6 million pursuant to the Skilled Nursing Facility Targeted Distribution, which generally related to our certified skilled nursing facilities.

$3.5 million pursuant to the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution, including incentive payments, which related to our skilled nursing care provided through our CCRCs.

Grants received from the Provider Relief Fund are subject to the terms and conditions of the program, including that such funds may only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and will reimburse only for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to COVID-19 and have not been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are not obligated to reimburse. The permissible uses of grants from the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution are further limited to certain infection control expenses. The program requires us to report to HHS on our use of the grants, and our reporting is subject to audit. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $109.8 million of the grants as other operating income based upon our estimates of our satisfaction of the conditions of the grants during such period.

HHS continues to evaluate future allocations of, and regulation and guidance regarding, grants made under the Provider Relief Fund. We intend to pursue additional funding that may become available. However, there can be no assurance that we will qualify for, or receive, grants in the amount we expect, that additional restrictions on the permissible uses or terms and conditions of the grants will not be imposed by HHS, or that future funding programs will be made available for which we qualify.

10


During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received $87.5 million under the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program administered by CMS, which was temporarily expanded by the CARES Act. Approximately $75.2 million related to our Health Care Services segment and the remainder related to our CCRCs segment. Under the program, we requested acceleration/advancement of 100% of our Medicare payment amount for a three-month period. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act, enacted on October 1, 2020, amended the repayment terms for accelerated/advanced payments. As amended, recoupment of accelerated/advanced payments will begin one year after payments were issued. Payments will be recouped at a rate of 25% of Medicare payments for the first eleven months following the anniversary of issuance and at a rate of 50% of Medicare payments for the next six months. Any outstanding balance of accelerated/advanced payments will be due following such recoupment period. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement (as defined below) we expect to repay the then outstanding balance of such accelerated/advance payments related to our Health Care Services segment at the closing of the sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment.

Under the CARES Act, we have elected to defer payment of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes incurred from March 27, 2020 through December 31, 2020. One-half of such deferral amount will become due on each of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2020, we have deferred payment of $72.7 million under the program.

The CARES Act temporarily suspended the 2% Medicare sequestration for the period May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, which primarily benefited our Health Care Services segment. This suspension had a favorable impact of $4.0 million on the segment’s resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, extended the sequestration suspension through March 31, 2021.

We are eligible to claim the employee retention tax credit for certain of our associates under the CARES Act. The refundable tax credit for 2020 is available to employers that fully or partially suspend operations during any calendar quarter in 2020 due to orders from an appropriate governmental authority limiting commerce, travel, or group meetings due to COVID-19, and is equal to 50% of stockholders.qualified wages paid after March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2020 to qualified employees, with a maximum credit of $5,000 per employee. We estimate that we will be eligible to claim tax credits of approximately $10 million for 2020. The credit was modified and extended for wages paid from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and we are assessing our eligibility to claim such credit. There can be no assurance that we will qualify for, or receive, tax credits in the amount we expect.

In addition to the grants described above, we have received and recognized $5.9 million of other operating income from grants from other government sources.

We cannot predict with reasonable certainty the impacts that COVID-19 ultimately will have on our business, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity, and our response efforts may continue to delay or negatively impact our strategic initiatives, including plans for future growth. The ultimate impacts of COVID-19 will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including the duration, severity, and breadth of the pandemic and any resurgence of the disease; the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s economy and debt and equity markets and the local economies in our markets; the development, availability, utilization, and efficacy of COVID-19 testing, therapeutic agents, and vaccines and the prioritization of such resources among businesses and demographic groups; government financial and regulatory relief efforts that may become available to business and individuals, including our ability to qualify for and satisfy the terms and conditions of financial relief; perceptions regarding the safety of senior living communities during and after the pandemic; changes in demand for senior living communities and our ability to adapt our sales and marketing efforts to meet that demand; the impact of COVID-19 on our residents’ and their families’ ability to afford our resident fees, including due to changes in unemployment rates, consumer confidence, housing markets, and equity markets caused by COVID-19; changes in the acuity levels of our new residents; the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on seniors generally and those residing in our communities; the duration and costs of our response efforts, including increased equipment, supplies, labor, litigation, testing, vaccination clinic, and other expenses; the impact of COVID-19 on our ability to complete financings, refinancings, or other transactions (including dispositions) or to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments and to satisfy financial and other covenants in our debt and lease documents; increased regulatory requirements, including unfunded, mandatory testing; increased enforcement actions resulting from COVID-19; government action that may limit our collection or discharge efforts for delinquent accounts; and the frequency and magnitude of legal actions and liability claims that may arise due to COVID-19 or our response efforts.

2021 Pending Sale of Health Care Services

On February 24, 2021, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with affiliates of HCA Healthcare, Inc. (“HCA Healthcare”), providing for the sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment for a
11


purchase price of $400 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement, including a reduction for the remaining outstanding balance as of the closing of Medicare advance payments and deferred payroll tax payments related to the Health Care Services segment, which were $75.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. We expect our net cash proceeds at the closing will be approximately $300 million, subject to the timing of closing with respect to the adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement also contains certain agreed upon indemnities for the benefit of the purchaser. The closing of the sale transaction is anticipated to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021, subject to receipt of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, at closing of the transaction, we will retain a 20% equity interest in the business. Upon closing, we expect that the results and financial position of our Health Care Services segment will be deconsolidated from our financial statements and that our interest in the joint venture will be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We anticipate that the sale transaction will utilize a portion of our federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset the expected taxable gain on such transaction.

Community Portfolio Optimization

During 2020, we continued execution on our portfolio optimization initiative through which we have disposed of owned and leased communities and restructured leases. Such activities during 2020 included restructuring our lease arrangements with Ventas announced on July 27, 2020 and closing the multi-part transaction with Healthpeak announced on October 1, 2019. As a result of these initiatives and other lease restructuring, expiration, and termination activity, and other transactions, during the year ended December 31, 2020 we:

Terminated our triple-net lease obligations on an aggregate of 32 communities, including through the acquisition of 27 formerly leased communities;
Disposed of an aggregate of seven owned communities;
Sold substantially all of our remaining ownership interests in unconsolidated ventures, including our entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak; and
Reduced our management of communities on behalf of former unconsolidated ventures and third parties, representing a net reduction of 25 managed communities during the year.

Summaries of these transactions, and their impact on our results of operations are set forth in "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." See also Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for more information about the transactions.

As of December 31, 2020, we owned 350 communities, representing a majority of our consolidated community portfolio, leased 301 communities, and managed 75 communities. The charts below show the foregoing changes in our portfolio from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020.


bkd-20201231_g1.jpg

During the year ending December 31, 2021, we expect to close on the dispositions of three owned communities (249 units) classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020 and terminations of a substantial portion of our management arrangements. The closings of the various pending and expected transactions are, or will be, subject to the satisfaction of various closing
12


conditions, including (where applicable) the receipt of regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the transactions will close or, if they do, when the actual closings will occur.

Capital Expenditures

Our total community-level capital expenditures were $140.1 million for 2020, which was a decrease of $98.6 million from 2019, and $27.8 million of which was reimbursed by our lessors. The decrease in community-level capital expenditures was partially due to our approximate $48 million reduction to our pre-pandemic full-year 2020 community-level capital expenditure plans as we delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects in response to the pandemic. In the aggregate, we expect our full-year 2021 non-development capital expenditures, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, to be approximately $140 million. In addition, we expect our full-year 2021 development capital expenditures to be approximately $10 million, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, and such projects include those for expansion, repositioning, redeveloping, and major renovation of selected existing senior living communities. We anticipate that our 2021 capital expenditures will be funded from cash on hand, cash equivalents, marketable securities, cash flows from operations, and reimbursements from lessors.

The Senior Living Industry

The senior living industry has undergone dramatic growth in the last 25 years, marked by the emergence of assisted living communities in the mid-1990s, and it remains highly fragmented with numerous local and regional operators. According to data from the National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing & Care Industry ("NIC"), there were approximately 2,500 local and regional senior housing operators as of December 31, 2020, of which more than 90% operated five or fewer communities. We are one of a limited number of large operators that provide a broad range of community locations and service level offerings at varying price levels.

The industry has attracted additional investment resulting in increased construction and development of new senior housing supply. New community openings have subjected the senior housing industry to oversupply and increased competitive pressures. Data from NIC shows that industry occupancy began to decrease starting in 2016 as a result of new openings and oversupply. During and since 2016, we have experienced an elevated rate of competitive new openings, with significant new competition opening in many markets, which has adversely affected our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. In 2020, competitive new openings remained elevated, but declined from 2019. Beginning in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in additional occupancy pressure for our industry. NIC data shows that seniors housing occupancy decreased for three consecutive quarters between March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2020, with nearly all markets falling to record low occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2020. We cannot predict with reasonable certainty whether or when demand for senior living communities will return to pre-COVID-19 levels or the extent to which the pandemic’s effect on demand may adversely affect the amount of resident fees we are able to collect from our residents.

The primary market of the senior living industry is individuals age 80 and older. Due to demographic trends, and continuing advances in science, nutrition, and healthcare, the senior population will continue to grow. US Census projections suggest that, starting in 2022, there will be nearly one million new potential residents per year, and we believe that demand for senior care will increase as a result.     

As seniors are living longer and this segment of the population rapidly grows, so will the number living with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias and the burden of chronic diseases and conditions. As a result of increased mobility in society, a reduction of average family size, and increased number of two-wage earner couples, families struggle to provide care for seniors and therefore look for alternatives outside of their family for care. There is a growing consumer awareness among seniors and their families concerning the types of services provided by senior living operators, which has further contributed to the demand for senior living services.

In recent years, the high level of new openings, nursing and caregiver shortages due to the pandemic, lower levels of unemployment, and implementation of higher minimum wages generally have contributed to wage pressures and increased competition for community leadership and personnel. We continue to address new competition by focusing on operations with the objective to ensure high customer satisfaction, retain key leadership, and actively engage district and regional management in community operations; enhancing our local and national marketing and public relations efforts; and evaluating current community position relative to competition and repositioning if necessary (e.g., services, amenities, programming, and price). Like other companies, our financial results may be negatively impacted by increasing salaries, wages, and benefits costs for our associates, particularly if such costs cannot be covered by implementing price increases. Higher costs of food, utilities, equipment and supplies, insurance, and real estate taxes may also have a negative impact on our financial results.

13


The COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant challenges to our industry, as outlined above. Additional challenges in our industry include increased state and local regulation of the assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing sectors, which has led to an increase in the cost of doing business. The regulatory environment continues to intensify in the number and types of laws and regulations affecting us, accompanied by increased enforcement activity by state and local officials. In addition, there continue to be various federal and state legislative and regulatory proposals to implement cost containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers in the future. We cannot predict what action, if any, Congress will take on reimbursement policies of the Medicare or Medicaid programs or what future rule changes CMS will implement. Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods or timing of government reimbursement programs could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

Competition

The senior living industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous organizations, including not-for-profit entities, that offer similar communities and services, such as home health care and hospice agencies, community-based service programs, retirement communities, convalescent centers, and other senior living providers. In general, regulatory and other barriers to competitive entry in the independent living, assisted living, and memory care sectors of the senior living industry are not substantial. Consequently, we may encounter competition that could limit our ability to attract and retain residents and associates, raise or maintain resident fees, and expand our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flows. Due to the industry's low occupancy levels, certain competitors may price aggressively in order to capture market share. Our major publicly-traded senior housing competitors are Capital Senior Living Corporation and Five Star Senior Living, Inc. Our major private senior housing competitors include Holiday Retirement, Life Care Services, LLC, Atria Senior Living Inc., Senior Lifestyle Corp., and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC, as well as a large number of not-for-profit entities.

Over the long term we plan to evaluate and, where opportunities arise, pursue development, investment, and acquisition opportunities. The market for acquiring and/or operating senior living communities is highly competitive, and some of our present and potential senior living competitors have, or may obtain, greater financial resources than us and may have a lower cost of capital. In addition, several publicly-traded and non-traded real estate investment trusts ("REITs") and private equity firms have similar objectives as we do, along with greater financial resources and/or lower costs of capital than we are able to obtain. Partially as a result of tax law changes enacted through REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act ("RIDEA"), we now compete more directly with the various publicly-traded healthcare REITs for the acquisition of senior housing properties, the largest of which are Ventas and Welltower.

Our History

Brookdale Senior Living Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation in June 2005 for the purpose of combining two leading senior living operating companies, Brookdale Living Communities, Inc. and Alterra Healthcare Corporation, which had been operating independently since 1986 and 1981, respectively. On November 22, 2005, we completed our initial public offering of common stock, and on July 25, 2006, we acquired American Retirement Corporation, another leading senior living provider that had been operating independently since 1978. On September 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Horizon Bay, which was the then-ninth largest operator of senior living communities in the United States. On July 31, 2014, we completed our acquisition by merger of Emeritus Corporation, which was the then-second largest operator of senior living communities in the United States.

Segments

As of December 31, 2020, we had five reportable segments: Independent Living; Assisted Living and Memory Care; CCRCs; Health Care Services; and Management Services. These segments were determined based on the way that our chief operating decision maker organizes our business activities for making operating decisions, assessing performance, developing strategy, and allocating capital resources.

Communities that we own or lease are included in the Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, or CCRCs segment, as applicable. The home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services provided to our residents and seniors living outside of our communities are generally included in the Health Care Services segment, while skilled nursing and inpatient healthcare services provided in our skilled nursing units are included in the CCRCs segment. Communities that we manage on behalf of third parties or unconsolidated ventures in which we have an ownership interest are included in the Management Services segment. The table below shows the number of communities and units within each of our senior housing and Management Services segments as of December 31, 2020.
14


CommunitiesUnits% of Total UnitsAverage Number of Units per Community
Independent Living68 12,534 19.9 %184 
Assisted Living and Memory Care563 35,126 55.7 %62 
CCRCs20 5,322 8.4 %266 
Management Services75 10,129 16.0 %135 
Total726 63,111 100.0 %87 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we generated 81.9% of our resident fee revenue from private pay customers, 14.5% from government reimbursement programs (primarily Medicare) and 3.6% from other payor sources. Approximately 87.3% of resident fee revenue was derived from our senior housing segments, of which 50.9% of our resident fee revenue was generated from owned communities and 36.4% was generated from leased communities. Our Health Care Services segment generated 12.7% of resident fee revenue. The table below shows the percentage of our resident fee and management fee revenue attributable to each of our segments for the year ended December 31, 2020.
(in thousands)Resident Fee and Management Fee Revenue% of Total
Independent Living$512,598 17.0 %
Assisted Living and Memory Care1,691,276 55.9 %
CCRCs321,883 10.6 %
Health Care Services366,810 12.1 %
Management Services130,690 4.4 %
Total resident fee and management fee revenue$3,023,257 100.0 %

Further operating results and financial metrics from our five segments are discussed further in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Our Community Offerings

We offer a variety of senior living communities in locations across the United States. We operate and manage independent living, assisted living, and memory care communities, and CCRCs. The majority of our units are organized in campus-like settings or stand-alone communities offering multiple service levels.

Independent Living Communities

Our independent living communities are primarily designed for middle to upper income seniors who desire to live in a residential setting that feels like home, without the efforts of ownership. Some of our independent living residents choose to relocate to a community in a metropolitan area that is closer to their adult children. The majority of our independent living communities consist of both independent and assisted living units in a single community, which allows residents to age-in-place by providing them with a broad continuum of senior independent and assisted living services to accommodate their changing needs. While the number varies depending upon the particular community, as of December 31, 2020 approximately 80% of all of the units at our independent living communities were independent living units, with the balance of the units licensed for assisted living and memory care.

Our independent living communities are generally large multi-story buildings averaging 184 units with extensive common areas and amenities to support the lifestyle preferences of more independent seniors. Residents may choose from studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom units, depending upon the specific community. Each independent living community provides residents with basic services such as dining service options, 24-hour emergency response, housekeeping, education and wellness programs, and recreational activities. Most of these communities also offer custom tailored concierge and personal assistance/private duty services at an additional charge, which may include medication reminders, daily check-in, transportation, shopping, escort, and companion services.

15


In addition to the basic services, our independent living communities that include assisted living also provide residents with personal care and convenience service options to provide assistance with ADLs. The levels of care provided to residents vary from community to community depending, among other things, upon the licensing requirements and healthcare regulations of the state in which the community is located.

Residents in our independent living communities are able to maintain their residency for an extended period of time due to the range of service options available (not including skilled nursing). Residents with cognitive or physical frailties and higher level service needs can often be accommodated with supplemental services in their own units or, in certain communities, are cared for in a more structured and supervised environment on a separate wing or floor. These communities also generally have a dedicated assisted living staff and separate assisted living dining rooms and activity areas.

Assisted Living and Memory Care Communities

Our assisted living and memory care communities offer housing and 24-hour assistance with ADLs for mid-acuity and frail elderly residents. Residents typically enter an assisted living or memory care community due to a relatively immediate need for services that may have been triggered by a medical event. Our assisted living and memory care communities include both freestanding, multi-story communities with more than 50 beds, as well as smaller, freestanding, single story communities. Although building layouts will vary depending on specific location, the community may include (i) private studio, one-bedroom, and one-bedroom deluxe apartments, or (ii) individual rooms for one or two residents in wings or "neighborhoods" scaled to a single-family home, that would include a living room, dining room, patio or enclosed porch, laundry room, and personal care area, as well as a caregiver work station.

We also provide memory care services at freestanding memory care communities that are specifically designed for residents with dementia, including Alzheimer's disease and other forms of cognitive impairment. Our freestanding memory care communities have approximately 20 to 70 beds and some are part of a campus-like setting which includes a freestanding assisted living community. As of December 31, 2020, we provide memory care services at 371 of our communities, aggregating 9,796 memory care units across our segments. These communities include 110 freestanding memory care communities with 4,279 units included in our Assisted Living and Memory Care segment.

All residents at our assisted living and memory care communities are eligible to receive the basic care level, which includes ongoing health assessments, three meals per day and snacks, coordination of special diets planned by a registered dietitian, 24-hour staff assistance, assistance with medical care coordination, education and wellness programs, social and recreational activities providing socialization and engagement, housekeeping, and personal laundry services. In some locations, we offer our residents exercise programs and programs designed to address needs associated with early stages of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. For an additional cost at these communities, we offer higher levels of personal care services to residents who are more physically frail or require more frequent or intensive physical assistance or increased personal care and supervision due to cognitive impairments.

As a result of their progressive cognitive decline, residents at our memory care units typically require higher levels of personal care and services than in assisted living and therefore pay higher monthly service fees. Specialized services include assistance with ADLs, behavior management, and an activities program, the goal of which is to provide a normalized environment that supports residents' decreased functional abilities.

CCRCs

Our CCRCs are large communities that offer a variety of living arrangements and services to accommodate a broad spectrum of physical ability and healthcare needs. Most of our CCRCs have independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing available on one campus or within the immediate area. Our CCRC residents are generally seniors who are seeking a community that offers a broad continuum of care that will enable them to age in place. Generally, these residents will initially enter the community as an independent living resident and may, at a later time, advance into an assisted living or skilled nursing area as their needs change.

Our Healthcare Services Offerings

Through our Health Care Services segment we currently provide home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to residents of many of our communities and to seniors living outside of our communities. As of December 31, 2020, our Health Care Services segment platform included networks in 28 states with the ability to provide home health services to approximately 60% of our units, hospice services to approximately 25% of our units, and outpatient therapy to approximately 20% of our units. The Health Care Services segment does not include the skilled nursing and inpatient healthcare services
16


provided in our skilled nursing units, which are included in our CCRCs segment. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we generated approximately 45% of our Health Care Services segment revenue from residents at our communities and approximately 55% from our patients outside our communities. As described above, we expect to sell 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with HCA Healthcare, which transaction is expected to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021. Upon closing, we expect that the results and financial position of our Health Care Services segment will be deconsolidated from our financial statements.

The home health services we provide include skilled nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, home health aide services, and social services as needed. Our hospice services include clinical and skilled care, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling. Our outpatient therapy services include physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology services, and other specialized therapy. The majority of our home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services are reimbursed by government reimbursement programs, primarily Medicare, and non-covered services are paid directly by patients from private pay sources.

Management Services

As of December 31, 2020, we managed 72 communities (9,202 units) on behalf of third parties and three communities (927 units) for which we have an equity interest, which represented approximately 16% of our senior housing capacity. Under our management arrangements, we receive management fees, which are generally determined by an agreed upon percentage of gross revenues (as defined in the management arrangement), as well as reimbursed expenses, which represent the reimbursement of certain expenses we incur on behalf of the owners. During 2021, we expect terminations of a substantial portion of our management arrangements. Generally either party to our management arrangements may terminate upon the occurrence of an event of default caused by the other party, generally subject to cure rights. Several long-term agreements also provide for early termination rights of the owner which may in some cases require an early termination fee.

Competitive Strengths

We believe our national network of senior living communities and healthcare services networks are well positioned to benefit from the future growth in the industry. Some of our most significant competitive strengths are:

Skilled management team with extensive experience. Our senior management team and our Board of Directors have extensive experience in the senior living, healthcare, hospitality, and real estate industries, including the operation and management of a broad range of senior living assets.

Geographically diverse, high-quality, purpose-built communities. As of December 31, 2020, we are the largest operator of senior living communities in the United States based on total capacity, with 726 communities in 43 states and the ability to serve approximately 64,000 residents.

Ability to provide a broad spectrum of care. Given our diverse mix of independent living, assisted living and memory care communities, and CCRCs, as well as our healthcare services offerings, through our clinical team and high-quality relationships with providers, we are able to meet a wide range of our residents' and patients' needs. We believe that we are one of the few companies in the senior living industry with this capability and the only company that does so at scale on a national basis. We believe that our multiple product offerings create marketing synergies and cross-selling opportunities.

Significant experience in providing healthcare services. Through our Health Care Services segment, we currently provide, and following the closing of our transaction with HCA Healthcare, the venture will provide a range of home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services in certain of our communities. Additionally, through our clinical team, we provide education, wellness, and other services to residents, which we believe is a distinct competitive difference among senior housing operators. We have significant experience in providing these services and expect to expand our offerings of these services to additional residents.

The size of our business allows us to realize cost and operating efficiencies while continuing a local-community focus. The size of our business allows us to realize cost savings, economies of scale in the procurement of goods and services, and access to favorable debt and financing terms. Our scale also allows us to achieve increased efficiencies with respect to various corporate functions. We negotiate contracts for food, insurance, and other goods and services with the advantages that scale provides. In addition, we leverage our centralized corporate functions such as finance, human resources, legal, information technology, and marketing. We intend to utilize our expertise and size to capitalize on economies of scale resulting from our national platform and to enhance our residents' and patients' experiences. We believe that our geographic
17


footprint and centralized infrastructure provide us with a significant operational advantage over local and regional operators of senior living communities.

Seasonality

Our senior housing business has typically experienced some seasonality, which we experience in certain regions more than others, due to weather patterns, geography, and higher incidence and severity of flu and other illnesses during winter months. Although our seasonal pattern varies from year to year and occupancy patterns have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, historically our average monthly occupancy has generally begun to decline sequentially in the fourth quarter of the year, and we have generally expected average monthly occupancy to begin to increase towards the end of the second quarter each year. Utility expenses trend seasonally high in the first quarter and third quarter of each year. Facility operating expenses, such as labor, food, and supplies also trend higher in the second half of the year compared with the first half due to an increased number of working days.

Operations

Operations Overview

We have implemented intensive standards, policies and procedures, and systems, including detailed staff resources and training, which we believe have contributed to high levels of customer service. Further, we believe our centralized support infrastructure allows our community-based leaders and personnel to focus on resident care and family connections.

Consolidated Corporate Operations Support

We have developed a centralized support infrastructure and services platform, which we believe provides us with a significant operational advantage over local and regional operators of senior living communities. The size of our business also allows us to achieve increased efficiencies with respect to various corporate functions such as procurement, human resources, finance, accounting, legal, information technology, and marketing. We are also able to realize cost efficiencies in the purchasing of food, supplies, insurance, benefits, and other goods and services. In addition, we have established centralized operations groups to support all of our product lines and communities in areas such as training, regulatory affairs, asset management, dining, clinical services, sales, customer engagement, marketing, and procurement. We have also established company-wide policies and procedures relating to, among other things: resident care; community design and community operations; billing and collections; accounts payable; finance and accounting; risk management; development of associate training materials and programs; advertising and marketing activities; the hiring and training of management and other community-based personnel; compliance with applicable local and state regulatory requirements; and implementation of our acquisition, development, and leasing plans.

Community Staffing and Training

Each community has an Executive Director responsible for the overall day-to-day operations of the community, including quality of care and service, social services, and financial performance. Each Executive Director receives specialized training from our learning and development associates. In addition, a portion of each Executive Director's compensation is directly tied to the operating performance of the community. We continue to take actions intended to simplify the role of our Executive Directors to allow them to focus on our residents and their families and our associates. We believe that the quality of our communities, coupled with support provided by the regional support infrastructure and our ability to provide industry-leading systems and training, has enabled us to attract high-quality, professional community Executive Directors.

Depending upon the size and type of the community, each Executive Director is supported by key leaders, a Health and Wellness Director (or nursing director), and/or a Sales Director. The Health and Wellness Director or nursing director is directly responsible for day-to-day care of residents. The Sales Director oversees the community's sales, marketing, and community outreach programs. Other key positions supporting each community may include individuals responsible for food service, healthcare services, activities, housekeeping, and maintenance.

We believe that quality of care and operating efficiency can be maximized by direct resident and staff contact. Associates involved in resident care, including administrative staff, are trained in support and care protocols, including emergency response techniques. We have adopted formal training and evaluation procedures to help ensure quality care for our residents. We have extensive policy and procedure manuals and hold regular training sessions for management and staff at each community.


18


Quality Assurance

We maintain quality assurance programs at each of our communities through our corporate and regional staff. Our quality assurance programs are designed to achieve a high degree of resident and family member satisfaction through the care and services that we provide and we have continued to transform our efforts throughout the pandemic through collaboration with our vendors and a combination of remote and in-person visits. Our quality control measures include, among other things, community inspections conducted by corporate staff on a regular basis. These inspections cover the appearance of the exterior and grounds; the appearance and cleanliness of the interior; the professionalism and friendliness of staff; quality of resident care (including assisted living services, nursing care, therapy, and home health programs); the quality of activities and the dining program; observance of residents in their daily living activities; and compliance with government regulations. Our quality control measures also include the survey of residents and family members on a regular basis to monitor their perception of the quality of services we provide to residents.

In order to foster a sense of belonging and engagement, as well as to respond to residents' needs and desires, at many of our communities, we have established a resident council or other resident advisory committees that meet at least monthly with the Executive Director of the community. Separate resident committees also exist at many of these communities for food service, activities, marketing, and hospitality. These committees promote resident involvement and satisfaction and enable community management to be more responsive to their residents' needs and desires.

Marketing and Sales

Our marketing efforts are intended to create awareness of our brand and services to educate prospects and referral sources about the Brookdale difference. We meet prospects where they are in their journey, whether they are learning about senior living for the first time or need to schedule a visit at one of our communities. We target a variety of audiences who have a role in the decision-making process for senior housing and our healthcare services, including potential residents, their family members and referral sources, including the medical community (hospital discharge planners, physicians, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and social workers), professional organizations, employer groups, clergy, area agencies for the elderly, and paid referral organizations. Our marketing associates develop strategies to promote our communities at the local market and national level. We execute an integrated marketing campaign approach, including local media and outreach programs, digital advertising, social media, print advertising, e-mail, direct mail, and special events, such as health fairs and community receptions. We generate hundreds of thousands of customer inquiries that go directly to our communities and Brookdale website. All online forms and many calls are handled by trained senior living advisors in our Brookdale Connection Center, who schedule visits directly to our communities. Certain resident referral programs have been established and promoted at many communities within the limitations of federal and state laws.

We will continue to leverage and grow our Brookdale brand to win locally in the markets we serve. In many markets where we offer more choices for senior living based on budget, lifestyle, and care needs, we use a network selling methodology to educate prospects on all of the options available. With our selling model, sales associates are organized to support individual and multiple communities directly. To meet the needs of local demand and supply, we create differentiated value through the segmentation of our communities based on price, service offerings, amenities, and programs offered.

Human Capital Resources

At Brookdale, we are dedicated to enriching the lives of those we serve with compassion, respect, excellence, and integrity. We know that our success is dependent on attracting, engaging, developing, and retaining the best associates. As of December 31, 2020, we employed approximately 45,000 associates, 70% of which were full time. Approximately 900 associates work in or through our Brentwood, Tennessee headquarters and Milwaukee, Wisconsin office, supporting our community- and agency-based associates.

Our Culture

We promote a culture based on servant leadership, where we believe purpose-driven work allows each of us to have a positive impact on the residents, patients, and associates we interact with every day. Our 2020 associate engagement survey showed that 93% of respondents know how they contribute to our success and 95% have a good understanding of our mission, vision, and cornerstones of passion, courage, partnership, and trust. We hire associates who we believe make serving seniors their calling, do what is right even when no one is watching, connect with fellow associates and our residents and patients, and treat one another with respect.


19


Inclusion and Diversity

We are a business of people taking care of people, where our associates do extraordinary things every day as part of their shared commitment to Brookdale’s cornerstones and mission. To attract and retain associates, we are committed to maintaining a welcoming and inclusive environment where people have an equal chance to grow and succeed. We support our associates by providing an open door policy, offering training to help our people grow and to understand our commitment to providing a workplace free from discrimination and harassment, consistently enforcing our policies, and maintaining the expectation that all our associates will be treated with dignity and respect.

We also believe that true commitment to creating and fostering an inclusive and diverse workplace is best accomplished by example. Our Board of Directors has purposefully evolved its gender composition to more closely resemble our customer and employee base, of which the majority are women. Women now comprise 44% of our Board of Directors. Over the last two years, we also increased the diversity of our Board of Directors and executive leadership team. Two of the top three positions are held by women and 14% of our executive officers are racially or ethnically diverse. Our commitment to diversity is further reflected in our workforce. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 81% of our associates are women, who comprise approximately 73% of the leadership roles at our communities, agencies, and corporate offices, and approximately 53% of our associates and 12% of our leadership roles are people of color. Our commitment to developing, retaining, and promoting diverse talent and advancing our inclusion strategy is ongoing.

Talent Acquisition, Development, and Retention:

In order to attract people who want to do challenging yet rewarding work, we offer competitive wages and benefits as well as opportunities to grow a career at Brookdale through mentorship, education, and training opportunities. We use a variety of recruitment strategies to attract diverse talent to our organization, including partnerships with local and national organizations. In 2020, we established new nursing school partnerships in Jacksonville, Florida and Denver, Colorado to continue to strengthen our pipeline for caregiver and clinical roles. Additionally, we launched a new career section on our website to attract veterans and military spouses/partners to join Brookdale.

We offer learning opportunities for our associates when they join Brookdale and throughout the year. Our newly implemented iLearn platform provides associates access to regulatory training, continuing education courses, and leadership and professional skill courses. We also offer a tuition reimbursement program for associates to continue to grow their career. To identify future leaders, we conduct strategic talent reviews regularly to provide senior leaders with visibility into succession for key leadership roles.

We believe the performance of individual communities is correlated to retention of our community leaders. Our Executive Director (ED) and Health and Wellness Director (HWD) combined annual retention at our same community portfolio has remained around 70%.

Total Rewards

We consider offering a competitive total rewards program an important aspect of being an employer of choice. Both full-time and part-time associates may participate in our 401(k) retirement savings plan with an opportunity for a matching contribution, our associate stock purchase plan, and other benefit plans. We provide full-time associates additional benefits, including paid time off ("PTO") and holidays as well as adoption benefits. In 2020, over 50% of eligible full-time associates participated in our medical and dental insurance plans.

We also recognize that there may be a time when associates need financial assistance due to extraordinary circumstances such as a fire, a tornado or hurricane, or the pandemic. Our Associate Compassion Fund provides this type of assistance for associates in need. In 2020, approximately $1.8 million of donations of PTO by our associates were provided directly to associates in need, approximately $0.3 million of which was donated by our senior leadership team to specifically support those associates affected by COVID-19.

20


Industry Regulation

The regulatory environment surrounding the senior living industry continues to intensify in the number and type of laws and regulations affecting it. Federal, state, and local officials are increasingly focusing their efforts on enforcement of these laws and regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-community providers like us. Some of the laws and regulations that impact our industry include: state and local laws impacting licensure, protecting consumers against deceptive practices, and generally affecting the communities' management of property and equipment and how we otherwise conduct our operations, such as fire, health, safety, and privacy laws and regulations; federal and state laws governing Medicare and Medicaid, which regulate allowable costs, pricing, quality of services, quality of care, food service, resident rights (including abuse and neglect) and fraud; federal and state residents' rights statutes and regulations; Anti-Kickback and physicians referral ("Stark") laws; and safety and health standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state, and local legislation or regulation. Changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many senior living communities are also subject to regulation and licensing by state and local health and social service agencies and other regulatory authorities. Although requirements vary from state to state, these requirements may address, among others, the following: personnel education, training, and records; community services; staffing; physical plant specifications; furnishing of resident units; food and housekeeping services; emergency evacuation plans; emergency power generator requirements; professional licensing and certification of staff; and resident rights and responsibilities. In several of the states in which we operate there are different levels of care that may be provided based on the level of licensure. Several of the states in which we operate, or intend to operate, assisted living and memory care communities, home health and hospice agencies, and/or skilled nursing facilities require a certificate of need before the community or agency may be opened or the services at an existing community may be expanded. Senior living communities may also be subject to state and/or local building, zoning, fire, and food service codes and must be in compliance with these local codes before licensing or certification may be granted. These laws and regulatory requirements could affect our ability to expand into new markets and to expand our services and communities in existing markets.

Unannounced surveys or inspections may occur annually or bi-annually, or following a regulator's receipt of a complaint about a provider. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we receive survey reports from state or federal regulatory bodies resulting from such inspections or surveys. Most inspection deficiencies are resolved through a plan of corrective action relating to the community's operations, but the reviewing agency may have the authority to take further action against a licensed or certified community or agency, which could result in the imposition of fines, imposition of a provisional or conditional license, suspension or revocation of a license, suspension or denial of admissions, loss of certification as a provider under federal and/or state reimbursement programs, or imposition of other sanctions, including criminal penalties. Loss, suspension, or modification of a license may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults. Sanctions may be taken against providers or facilities without regard to the providers' or facilities' history of compliance. We may also expend considerable resources to respond to federal and state investigations or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. To date, none of the deficiency reports received by us has resulted in a suspension, fine, or other disposition that has had a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations, or cash flows. However, any future substantial failure to comply with any applicable legal and regulatory requirements could result in a material adverse effect to our business as a whole. In addition, states' Attorneys General vigorously enforce consumer protection laws as those laws relate to the senior living industry. State Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Units may also investigate assisted living and memory care communities even if the community or any of its residents do not receive federal or state funds.

Regulation of the senior living industry is evolving at least partly because of the growing interests of a variety of advocacy organizations and political movements attempting to standardize regulations for certain segments of the industry, particularly assisted living and memory care. Our operations could suffer from future regulatory developments, such as federal assisted living and memory care laws and regulations, as well as mandatory increases in the scope and severity of deficiencies determined by survey or inspection officials or an increase the number of citations that can result in civil or criminal penalties. Certain current state laws and regulations allow enforcement officials to make determinations on whether the care provided by one or more of our communities exceeds the level of care for which the community is licensed. Furthermore, certain states may allow citations in one community to impact other communities in the state. Revocation or suspension of a license, or a citation, at a given community could therefore impact our ability to obtain new licenses or to renew existing licenses at other communities, which may also cause us to be in default under our loan or lease agreements and trigger cross-defaults or may also trigger defaults under certain of our credit agreements, or adversely affect our ability to operate and/or obtain financing in the future. If a state were to find that one community's citation will impact another of our communities, this will also increase costs and result in increased surveillance by the state survey agency. If regulatory requirements increase, whether through enactment of new laws or regulations or changes in the enforcement of existing rules, including increased enforcement brought about by advocacy groups, in addition to federal and state regulators, our operations could be adversely affected. Any adverse
21


finding by survey and inspection officials may serve as the basis for false claims lawsuits by private plaintiffs and may lead to investigations under federal and state laws, which may result in civil and/or criminal penalties against the community or individual.

There are various extremely complex federal and state laws governing a wide array of referrals, relationships, and arrangements and prohibiting fraud by healthcare providers, including those in the senior living industry, and governmental agencies are devoting increasing attention and resources to such anti-fraud initiatives. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 expanded the penalties for healthcare fraud. With respect to our participation in federal healthcare reimbursement programs, the government or private individuals acting on behalf of the government may bring an action under the False Claims Act alleging that a healthcare provider has defrauded the government and seek treble damages for false claims and the payment of additional monetary civil penalties. The False Claims Act allows a private individual with knowledge of fraud to bring a claim on behalf of the federal government and earn a percentage of the federal government's recovery. Because of these incentives, so-called "whistleblower" suits have become more frequent.

Additionally, since we operate communities and agencies that participate in federal and/or state healthcare reimbursement programs, we are subject to federal and state laws that prohibit anyone from presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for reimbursement which are false, fraudulent, or are for items or services that were not provided as claimed. Similar state laws vary from state to state. Violation of any of these laws can result in loss of licensure, citations, sanctions, and other criminal or civil fines and penalties, the refund of overpayments, payment suspensions, or termination of participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs, which may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults.

We are subject to certain federal and state laws that regulate financial arrangements by healthcare providers, such as the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, the Stark laws, and certain state referral laws. The Federal Anti-Kickback Law makes it unlawful for any person to offer or pay (or to solicit or receive) "any remuneration ... directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind" for referring or recommending for purchase any item or service which is eligible for payment under the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. Authorities have interpreted this statute very broadly to apply to many practices and relationships between healthcare providers and sources of patient referral. If we were to violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, we may face criminal penalties and civil sanctions, including fines and possible exclusion from government reimbursement programs, which may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults. Adverse consequences may also result if we violate federal Stark laws related to certain Medicare and Medicaid physician referrals. While we endeavor to comply with all laws that regulate the licensure and operation of our business, it is difficult to predict how our revenues could be affected if we were subject to an action alleging such violations.

We are subject to federal and state laws designed to protect the confidentiality of patient health information. The United States Department of Health and Human Services has issued rules pursuant to HIPAA relating to the privacy of such information. Rules that became effective in 2003 govern our use and disclosure of health information at certain HIPAA covered communities. We established procedures to comply with HIPAA privacy requirements at these communities. We were required to be in compliance with the HIPAA rule establishing administrative, physical, and technical security standards for health information by 2005. To the best of our knowledge, we are in compliance with these rules. In addition, states have begun to enact more comprehensive privacy laws and regulations addressing consumer rights to data protection or transparency. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act became effective in 2020, and we expect additional federal and state legislative and regulatory efforts to regulate consumer privacy protection in the future. These legislative and regulatory developments will impact the design and operation of our business and our privacy and security efforts.

We are subject to federal and state laws, regulations and executive orders relating to healthcare providers’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These requirements vary based on provider type and jurisdiction but generally include mandatory requirements for testing of residents and/or staff, implementation of infection control standards and procedures, imposition of restrictions on new admissions or readmissions of residents, requiring screening of all persons entering a community, imposition of restrictions or limitations on who and how residents may be visited, and imposition of mandatory notification requirements to residents, families, staff, and regulatory bodies related to positive COVID-19 cases. Enhanced or additional penalties may apply for violation of such requirements.

Medicare and Medicaid Programs

We rely on reimbursement from government programs, including the Medicare program and, to a lesser extent, Medicaid programs, for a portion of our revenues. Reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid represented 11.3% and 3.2%, respectively, of our total resident fee revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. During the period, Medicare reimbursements represented 76.8% of our Health Care Services segment revenue, and Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements represented 18.5% of our CCRCs segment revenue.
22



Medicare is a federal program that provides certain hospital and medical insurance benefits to persons age 65 and over and certain disabled persons. We receive revenue for our home health, hospice, skilled nursing, and outpatient therapy services from Medicare. Medicaid is a medical assistance program administered by each state, funded with federal and state funds pursuant to which healthcare benefits are available to certain indigent or disabled patients. We receive reimbursements under Medicaid (including state Medicaid waiver programs) for many of our assisted living and memory care communities.

These government reimbursement programs are highly regulated, involve significant administrative discretion, and are subject to frequent and substantial legislative, administrative, and interpretive changes, which may significantly affect reimbursement rates and the methods and timing of payments made under these programs. Continuing efforts of government to contain healthcare costs could materially and adversely affect us, and reimbursement levels may not remain at levels comparable to present levels or may not be sufficient to cover the costs allocable to patients eligible for reimbursement.

Medicare reimbursement for home health and skilled nursing services is subject to fixed payments under the Medicare prospective payment systems. In accordance with Medicare laws, CMS makes annual adjustments to Medicare payment rates in many prospective payment systems under what is commonly known as a "market basket update." Each year, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission ("MedPAC"), a commission chartered by Congress to advise it on Medicare payment issues, recommends payment policies to Congress for a variety of Medicare payment systems. Congress is not obligated to adopt MedPAC recommendations and based on previous years, there can be no assurance that Congress will adopt MedPAC's recommendations in any given year.

Medicaid reimbursement rates for many of our assisted living and memory care communities also are based upon fixed payment systems. Generally, these rates are adjusted annually for inflation. However, those adjustments may not reflect actual increases of the cost of providing healthcare services. In addition, Medicaid reimbursement can be impacted negatively by state budgetary pressures, which may lead to reduced reimbursement or delays in receiving payments.

Audits and Investigations

As a result of our participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, we are subject to various government reviews, audits, and investigations to verify our compliance with these programs and applicable laws and regulations. CMS has engaged a number of third party firms, including Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC), Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC), and Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPIC) to conduct extensive reviews of claims data to evaluate the appropriateness of billings submitted for payment. Audit contractors may identify overpayments based on coverage requirements, billing and coding rules, or other risk areas. In addition to identifying overpayments, audit contractors can refer suspected violations of law to government enforcement authorities. An adverse determination of government reviews, audits, and investigations may result in citations, sanctions, other criminal or civil fines and penalties, the refund of overpayments, payment suspensions, or termination of participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our costs to respond to and defend any such audits, reviews, and investigations may be significant and are likely to increase in the current enforcement environment, and any resulting sanctions or criminal, civil, or regulatory penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014

The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (the "IMPACT Act"), which became law in 2014, requires standardized assessment data for quality improvement, payment, and discharge planning purposes across the spectrum of post-acute care, including home health, hospice, and skilled nursing. The IMPACT Act will require such agencies and facilities to begin reporting standardized patient assessment data, new quality measures, and resource use measures. Failure to report such data when required would subject an agency or facility to a 2% reduction in market basket prices then in effect. The IMPACT Act further requires HHS and MedPAC to study and report to Congress by 2022 regarding alternative post-acute care payment models, including payment based upon individual patient characteristics and not care setting. The IMPACT Act also includes provisions impacting Medicare-certified hospices, including increasing survey frequency to once every 36 months, imposing a medical review process for facilities with a high percentage of stays in excess of 180 days, and updating the annual aggregate Medicare payment cap.

Home Health Claim Review Demonstrations

In 2016, CMS announced that it would implement a 3-year Medicare pre-claim review demonstration for home health services in the states of Illinois, Florida, Texas, Michigan, and Massachusetts. The pre-claim review is a process through which a request for provisional affirmation of coverage is submitted for review before a final claim is submitted for payment. CMS began the
23


pre-claim review demonstration in Illinois in August 2016, which CMS paused in April 2017. The pre-claim review demonstration resulted in increased administrative costs and reimbursement delays for our Illinois home health agency. In December 2018, CMS indicated it was continuing the process for obtaining approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of a 5-year Medicare claim review demonstration for Illinois, which would be further expanded to Florida, Texas, North Carolina, and Ohio. The Home Health Review Choice Demonstration ("RCD") was implemented on June 1, 2019 in Illinois and September 30, 2019 in Ohio. To allow home health agencies to transition to the Patient-Driven Grouping Model ("PDGM"), CMS announced in October 2019 that it was rescheduling the implementation of the RCD for the remaining states of Texas, North Carolina, and Florida. The demonstration began in Texas on March 2, 2020, and in North Carolina and Florida on August 31, 2020. CMS has stated that they will monitor the transition to PDGM and assess the need for any changes. Under the RCD, as currently proposed, providers have an initial choice of three options for review: pre-claim review, post-payment review, or minimal post-payment review with a 25% payment reduction for all home health services. We derive a significant portion of our home health revenue from these states. The implementation of the RCD has adversely affected our revenue, results of operations, and cash flows.

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing

On January 1, 2016, CMS implemented Home Health Value-Based Purchasing ("HHVBP"). The HHVBP model was designed to give Medicare certified home health agencies incentives or penalties, through payment bonuses, to give higher quality and more efficient care. HHVBP was rolled out to nine pilot states: Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington, a majority of which we currently have home health operations. Bonuses and penalties began in 2018 with the maximum of plus or minus 3% and are scheduled to grow to plus or minus 8% by 2022. Payment adjustments are calculated based on performance in three process measures, nine outcome measures, five patient satisfaction measures, and three agency self-reported measures. During the year ended December 31, 2020, our home health revenue declined approximately 1% due to HHVBP and we expect an additional decline of approximately 1% during 2021.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (the "BBA"), enacted in February 2018, includes several provisions impacting Medicare reimbursement to home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy providers. With respect to home health providers, the BBA (1) bases payment on a 30-day episode of care beginning January 1, 2020, coupled with annual determinations by CMS to ensure budget neutrality (including taking into account provider behavior), (2) eliminated retroactive payment adjustments based upon the level of therapy services required beginning January 1, 2020, (3) extended the 3% add-on payment for home health services provided to residents in rural areas beginning January 1, 2018, coupled with a reduction and phase out of such add-on payment over the following four fiscal years, and (4) established a market basket update of 1.5% for the year beginning January 1, 2020. With respect to hospice providers, the BBA established a new payment policy related to early discharges to hospice care from hospitals, which imposes a financial penalty on hospitals for each early discharge to hospice care beginning October 1, 2018. With respect to outpatient therapy providers, the BBA permanently repealed the Medicare Part B outpatient therapy cap effective January 1, 2018 and continued the targeted medical review process with a reduction of the applicable threshold triggering such review to $3,000 effective January 1, 2018.

CMS Final Rule 1689-FC for Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment

Based on the CMS final rule published in September, 2019, beginning in fiscal year 2021 (as amended by the CARES Act), CMS estimated that the net impact of the payment provisions of the proposed changes would result in an increase of 1.3% in reimbursement to home health providers and finalized the methodology used to determine the rural add-on payment for 2020 through 2022 as well as regulations text changes regarding certifying and recertifying patient eligibility for Medicare home health services and remote patient monitoring. Additionally, the proposed rule includes changes to the home health prospective payment system ("HHPPS") case-mix adjustment methodology through the use of a new PDGM for home health payments. This change affected home health revenue beginning on or after January 1, 2020 and also includes a change in the unit of payment from 60-day episodes of care to 30-day episodes of care.

Pandemic-Related Legislation

The CARES Act, signed into law on March 27, 2020, and Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, signed into law on April 24, 2020, provide liquidity and financial relief to certain businesses, among other things. The CARES Act temporarily suspended the 2% Medicare sequestration for the period May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, extended the sequestration suspension through March 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received $87.5 million under the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program administered by CMS, which was temporarily expanded by the CARES Act. Under the program, we requested acceleration/
24


advancement of 100% of our Medicare payment amount for a three-month period. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act, enacted on October 1, 2020, amended the repayment terms for accelerated/advanced payments. As amended, recoupment of accelerated/advanced payments will begin one year after payments were issued. Payments will be recouped at a rate of 25% of Medicare payments for the first eleven months following the anniversary of issuance and at a rate of 50% of Medicare payments for the next six months. Any outstanding balance of accelerated/advanced payments will be due following such recoupment period.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property, such as us, may be held liable in certain circumstances for the costs of investigation, removal, or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances, including, among others, petroleum and materials containing asbestos, that could be located on, in, at, or under a property, regardless of how such materials came to be located there. Additionally, such an owner or operator of real property may incur costs relating to the release of hazardous or toxic substances, including government fines and payments for personal injuries or damage to adjacent property. The cost of any required investigation, remediation, removal, mitigation, compliance, fines, or personal or property damages and our liability therefore could exceed the property's value and/or our assets' value. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate the damage caused by such substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell such property, to attract additional residents, retain existing residents, to borrow using such property as collateral, or to develop or redevelop such property. Such laws impose liability for investigation, remediation, removal, and mitigation costs on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at third-party sites. Such laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence, release, or disposal of such substances as well as without regard to whether such release or disposal was in compliance with law at the time it occurred. Moreover, the imposition of such liability upon us could be joint and several, which means we could be required to pay for the cost of cleaning up contamination caused by others who have become insolvent or otherwise judgment proof. We do not believe that we have incurred such liabilities that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Our operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, including those relating to: the handling, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of medical waste products generated at our communities; identification and warning of the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, as well as removal of such materials; the presence of other substances in the indoor environment; and protection of the environment and natural resources in connection with development or construction of our properties.

Some of our communities generate infectious or other hazardous medical waste due to the illness or physical condition of the residents, including, for example, blood-contaminated bandages, swabs and other medical waste products, and incontinence products of those residents diagnosed with an infectious disease. The management of infectious medical waste, including its handling, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal, is subject to regulation under various federal, state, and local environmental laws. These environmental laws set forth the management requirements for such waste, as well as related permit, record-keeping, notice, and reporting obligations. Our communities' engagement of waste management companies for the proper disposal of all infectious medical waste does not immunize us from alleged violations of such medical waste laws for operations for which we are responsible even if carried out by such waste management companies, nor does it immunize us from third-party claims for the cost to cleanup disposal sites at which such wastes have been disposed. Any finding that we are not in compliance with environmental laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Federal regulations require building owners and those exercising control over a building's management to identify and warn, via signs and labels, their employees and certain other employers operating in the building of potential hazards posed by workplace exposure to installed asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials in their buildings. The regulations also set forth employee training, record-keeping requirements, and sampling protocols pertaining to asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials. Significant fines can be assessed for violation of these regulations. Building owners and those exercising control over a building's management may be subject to an increased risk of personal injury lawsuits by workers and others exposed to asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials. The regulations may affect the value of a building containing asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials in which we have invested. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations also govern the removal, encapsulation, disturbance, handling, and/or disposal of asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials when such materials are in poor condition or in the event of construction, remodeling, renovation, or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose liability for improper handling or a release to the environment of asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials and may provide for fines to, and for third parties to seek recovery from, owners or
25


operators of real properties for personal injury or improper work exposure associated with asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials.

The presence of mold, lead-based paint, contaminants in drinking water, radon, and/or other substances at any of the communities we own or may acquire may lead to the incurrence of costs for remediation, mitigation, or the implementation of an operations and maintenance plan. Furthermore, the presence of mold, lead-based paint, contaminants in drinking water, radon, and/or other substances at any of the communities we own or may acquire may present a risk that third parties will seek recovery from the owners, operators, or tenants of such properties for personal injury or property damage. In some circumstances, areas affected by mold may be unusable for periods of time for repairs, and even after successful remediation, the known prior presence of extensive mold could adversely affect the ability of a community to retain or attract residents and could adversely affect a community's market value.

We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws. We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state, and local environmental regulation and legislation. Changes in the environmental regulatory framework (including legislative or regulatory efforts designed to address climate change) could have a material adverse effect on our business. Because environmental laws vary from state to state, expansion of our operations to states where we do not currently operate may subject us to additional restrictions on the manner in which we operate our communities.

Available Information

Information regarding our community and service offerings can be found at our website, www.brookdale.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports are available free of charge through our Certificatewebsite as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC, at the following address: www.brookdale.com/investor. The information within, or that can be accessed through, our website addresses is not part of Incorporationthis report.

26


Item 1A.Risk Factors

Our business faces significant risks and uncertainties. The discussion below addresses the most material factors, of which we are currently providesaware, that could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and future prospects. However, other factors not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and future prospects. Therefore, the risk factors below should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that we may face. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic, including the response efforts of federal, state, and local government authorities, businesses, individuals and us, has adversely impacted, and likely will continue to adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and stock price, and such impacts may be material.

We expect that the pandemic, and the response efforts of federal, state, and local government authorities, businesses, individuals and us, likely will continue to adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity through at least 2022. We cannot predict with reasonable certainty the impacts that COVID-19 ultimately will have on our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and stock price, and such impacts may be material and persist for some time. Further, our response efforts may continue to delay or negatively impact our strategic initiatives, including plans for future growth.

Due to the average age and prevalence of chronic medical conditions among our residents and patients, they generally are at disproportionately higher risk of hospitalization and adverse outcomes if they contract COVID-19. Upon confirmation of positive COVID-19 exposure at a community, we take actions intended to minimize further exposure, including associates’ adhering to personal protection protocols, isolating residents or finding placement in an alternate care setting to best address their care needs, and in some cases, restricting new resident admissions as directed by local health authorities. Seeking to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into our communities, and to help control further exposure to infections within communities, in March 2020 we began restricting visitors at all our communities to essential healthcare personnel and certain compassionate care situations, screening associates and permitted visitors, suspending group outings, modifying communal dining and programming to comply with social distancing guidelines and, in most cases, implementing in-room only dining and activities programming, requesting that residents refrain from leaving the community unless medically necessary, and requiring new residents and residents returning from a hospital or nursing home to isolate in their apartment for fourteen days. These restrictions were in place across our portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2020. We have adopted a framework for determining when to ease restrictions at each of our communities based on several criteria, including regulatory requirements and guidance, completion of baseline testing at the community, and the presence of current confirmed positive COVID-19 cases. Under this framework, we began easing restrictions on a community-by-community basis in July 2020 where regulatory requirements and guidance allowed, which easing may have included permitting outdoor, and in some cases, indoor visits with families, reduced capacity or socially distanced communal dining, limited communal activities programming, and in-person prospective resident visits. These restrictions at our communities may continue for some time, and we may revert to more restrictive measures if the pandemic worsens, as necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, or the direction of state or local health authorities. In July 2020, we completed baseline testing at all of our communities, and we have continued testing residents and associates at many of our communities.Further testing, whether undertaken proactively, as a result of regulatory requirements, or at the direction of state or local health authorities, may result in significant additional expense, additional temporary restrictions on move-ins at affected communities, continued need for isolating positive residents, increased use of PPE by our associates, and increased employee-related costs.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, have significantly disrupted demand for senior living communities and the sales process, which typically includes in-person prospective resident visits within communities. During the third quarter of 2020, we returned to using in-person prospective resident visits for a majority of our communities. However, several large markets continue with virtual-only prospective resident visits as of December 31, 2020. We have placed restrictions on move-ins at our communities when circumstances warrant, including at the direction of state or local health authorities.Although these restrictions began to ease considerably in August 2020, restrictions on move-ins escalated throughout the fourth quarter of 2020 due to the resurgence of the virus.At the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020, 86%, 98%, and 89% of our communities, respectively, were accepting new move-ins. As of February 22, 2021, 97% of our communities were accepting new move-ins. We believe potential residents and their families are more cautious regarding moving into senior living communities while the pandemic continues, and such caution may persist for some time. Our efforts to adapt our sales and marketing efforts to meet demand may not be successful. In addition, expanded use of telemedicine and
27


home healthcare by seniors, for which regulatory barriers have been relaxed during the pandemic, may result in less demand for our services. We cannot predict with reasonable certainty whether or when demand for senior living communities will return to pre-COVID-19 levels or the extent to which the pandemic’s effect on demand may adversely affect the amount of resident fees we are able to collect from our residents.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, began to adversely impact our occupancy and resident fee revenue significantly during March 2020, as new resident leads, visits (including virtual visits), and move-in activity declined significantly compared to typical levels. The year-over-year decrease in monthly move-ins of our same community portfolio has moderated from 64.2% in April 2020 to 26.5% in December 2020. Our consolidated senior housing portfolio's weighted average occupancy has declined in each month of the pandemic, from 82.7% in March 2020 to 71.5% in December 2020, and was 70.0% in January 2021. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $281.1 million of lost resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, including $228.5 million of lost resident fee revenue in our consolidated senior housing portfolio. Further deterioration of our resident fee revenue will result from lower move-in activity and the resident attrition inherent in our business, which may increase due to the impacts of COVID-19. In addition, our home health average daily census began to decrease in March 2020 due to lower occupancy in our communities and fewer elective medical procedures and hospital discharges, resulting in a 14.6% year-over-year decline in home health average daily census for the year ended December 31, 2020. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $52.6 million of lost resident fee revenue for the Health Care Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Facility operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $125.5 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the pandemic, including costs for: acquisition of additional PPE, medical equipment, and cleaning and disposable food service supplies; enhanced cleaning and environmental sanitation; increased employee-related costs, including labor, workers compensation, and health plan expense; increased expense for general liability claims; and COVID-19 testing of residents and associates where not otherwise covered by government payor or third-party insurance sources. We are not able to reasonably predict the total amount of costs we will incur related to the pandemic, and such costs may continue to be substantial. We have taken, and may take in future periods, significant impairment charges related to COVID-19 due to lower than expected operating performance at communities.

We continue to seek opportunities to enhance and preserve our liquidity, including through maintaining expense discipline, continuing to evaluate our financing structure and the state of debt markets, and seeking further government-sponsored financial relief related to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no assurance that debt financing will continue to be available on terms consistent with our expectations or at all, or that our efforts will be successful in seeking further government-sponsored financial relief or regarding the amount of, or conditions required to qualify for, any such relief.

Grants received from the Provider Relief Fund are subject to the terms and conditions of the program, including that such funds may only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and will reimburse only for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to COVID-19 and have not been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are not obligated to reimburse. HHS continues to evaluate and provide regulation and guidance regarding grants made under the Provider Relief Fund. We cannot provide assurance that additional restrictions on the permissible uses or terms and conditions of the grants will not be imposed by HHS. The program requires us to report to HHS on our use of the grants, and our reporting is subject to audit.

The pandemic has also caused substantial volatility in the market prices and trading volumes in the equity markets, including our stock. Our stock price and trading volume may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations as a result of the pandemic, and may decline in the future.

The ultimate impacts of COVID-19 on our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and stock price will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including the duration, severity, and breadth of the pandemic and any resurgence of the disease; the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s economy and debt and equity markets and the local economies in our markets; the development, availability, utilization, and efficacy of COVID-19 testing, therapeutic agents, and vaccines and the prioritization of such resources among businesses and demographic groups; government financial and regulatory relief efforts that may become available to business and individuals, including our ability to qualify for, and satisfy the terms and conditions of, financial relief; perceptions regarding the safety of senior living communities during and after the pandemic; changes in demand for senior living communities and our ability to adapt our sales and marketing efforts to meet that demand; the impact of COVID-19 on our residents’ and their families’ ability to afford our resident fees, including due to changes in unemployment rates, consumer confidence, housing markets, and equity markets caused by COVID-19; changes in the acuity levels of our new residents; the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on seniors generally and those residing in our
28


communities; the duration and costs of our response efforts, including increased equipment, supplies, labor, litigation, testing, vaccination clinic, and other expenses; the impact of COVID-19 on our ability to complete financings, refinancings, or other transactions (including dispositions) or to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments and to satisfy financial and other covenants in our debt and lease documents; increased regulatory requirements, including unfunded, mandatory testing; increased enforcement actions resulting from COVID-19; government action that may limit our collection or discharge efforts for delinquent accounts; and the frequency and magnitude of legal actions and liability claims that may arise due to COVID-19 or our response efforts.

Business, Operations, and Strategy

Due to the dependency of our revenues on private pay sources, events which adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford our resident fees (including downturns in the economy, housing market, consumer confidence, or the equity markets and unemployment among resident family members) could cause our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow to decline.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we generated 81.9% of our resident fee revenue from private pay customers. Costs to seniors associated with independent and assisted living services are not generally reimbursable under government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Only seniors with income or assets meeting or exceeding the comparable median in the regions where our communities are located typically can afford to pay our monthly resident fees. Economic downturns, softness in the housing market, higher levels of unemployment among resident family members, lower levels of consumer confidence, stock market volatility, and/or changes in demographics could adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford our resident fees. If we are unable to retain and/or attract seniors with sufficient income, assets, or other resources required to pay the fees associated with independent and assisted living services and other service offerings, our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow could decline.

Changes in the reimbursement rates, methods, or timing of payment from government reimbursement programs could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

We rely on reimbursement from government programs for a portion of our revenues, and we cannot provide assurance that reimbursement levels will not decrease in the future, which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. For the year ended December 31, 2020, reimbursements from government programs represented 14.5% of our total resident fee revenues, and Medicare reimbursements represented 76.8% of our Health Care Services segment revenue. See "Item 1. Business–Medicare and Medicaid Programs" for more information regarding these programs, including the impact of recent legislation and rulemaking on such programs.

Congress continues to discuss medical spending reduction measures, leading to a high degree of uncertainty regarding potential reforms to government reimbursement programs. These discussions, along with broader healthcare reform, could result in major changes in the healthcare delivery and reimbursement systems on both the national and state levels.

Healthcare reform and regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flow through, among other things, decreasing funds available for our services or increasing our operating costs. Continuing efforts of government to contain healthcare costs could materially and adversely affect us, and reimbursement levels may not remain at levels comparable to present levels or may not be sufficient to cover the costs allocable to patients eligible for reimbursement.

The impact of ongoing healthcare reform efforts on our business cannot accurately be predicted.

The healthcare industry in the United States is subject to fundamental changes due to ongoing healthcare reform efforts and related political, economic, and regulatory influences. Notably, the Affordable Care Act resulted in expanded healthcare coverage to millions of previously uninsured people beginning in 2014 and has resulted in significant changes to the United States healthcare system. To help fund this expansion, the Affordable Care Act outlines certain reductions for Medicare reimbursed services, including skilled nursing, home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services, as well as certain other changes to Medicare payment methodologies. This comprehensive healthcare legislation has resulted and will continue to result in extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities, and also may be altered, amended, repealed, or replaced. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the Affordable Care Act due to the complexity of the law and implementing regulations, as well our inability to foresee how CMS and other participants in the healthcare industry will respond to the choices available to them under the law. The provisions of the legislation and other regulations implementing the provisions of the Affordable Care Act
29


or any amended or replacement legislation may increase our costs, adversely affect our revenues, expose us to expanded liability, or require us to revise the ways in which we conduct our business.

In addition to its impact on the delivery and payment for healthcare, the Affordable Care Act and the implementing regulations have resulted and may continue to result in increases to our costs to provide healthcare benefits to our employees. We also may be required to make additional employee-related changes to our business as a result of provisions in the Affordable Care Act or any amended or replacement legislation impacting the provision of health insurance by employers, which could result in additional expense and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

Senior housing construction and development, lower industry occupancy, and increased competition, may have an adverse effect on our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

The senior living industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous organizations, including not-for-profit entities, that offer similar communities and services, such as home health care and hospice agencies, community-based service programs, retirement communities, convalescent centers, and other senior living providers. In general, regulatory and other barriers to competitive entry in the independent living, assisted living, and memory care sectors of the senior living industry are not substantial. The industry has attracted additional investment resulting in increased construction and development of new senior housing supply. New community openings have subjected our industry to oversupply and increased competitive pressures. Industry data shows that industry occupancy began to decrease starting in 2016 as a result of new openings and oversupply. During and since 2016 we have experienced an elevated rate of competitive new openings, with significant new competition opening in many markets, which has adversely affected our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. Such new competition could limit our ability to attract new residents and associates, to retain existing residents and associates, and to raise or maintain resident fees or expand our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. Beginning in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in additional occupancy pressure for our industry. Industry data shows that seniors housing occupancy decreased for three consecutive quarters between March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2020, with nearly all markets falling to record low occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2020. Due to the industry's low occupancy levels, certain competitors may price aggressively in order to capture market share.

The geographic concentration of our communities could leave us vulnerable to an economic downturn, regulatory changes, acts of nature, or the effects of climate change in those areas, which could negatively impact our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

We have a high concentration of communities in various geographic areas, including the states of California, Florida, and Texas. As a result of this concentration, the conditions of local economies and real estate markets, changes in governmental regulations, acts of nature, and other factors that may result in a decrease in demand for senior living services in these areas could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. Given the location of our communities, we are particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase, or damage caused by severe weather conditions or natural disasters such as hurricanes, wildfires, earthquakes, or tornados. Any significant loss due to a natural disaster may not be covered by insurance and may lead to an increase in the cost of insurance or unavailability on acceptable terms. Climate change may also have effects on our business by increasing the cost of property insurance or making coverage unavailable on acceptable terms. To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our communities are located, we may experience increased frequency of severe weather conditions or natural disasters or other changes to weather patterns, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, or cash flow may be adversely affected. In addition, government regulation intended to mitigate the impact of climate change, severe weather patterns, or natural disasters could result in additional required capital expenditures to comply with such regulation without a corresponding increase in our revenues.

Termination of our resident agreements and vacancies in the living spaces we lease could adversely affect our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

State regulations governing assisted living and memory care communities require written resident agreements with each resident. Several of these regulations also require that each resident have the right to terminate the resident agreement for any reason on reasonable notice. Consistent with these regulations, many of our assisted living and memory care resident agreements allow residents to terminate their agreements upon 30 days' or less notice. Our independent living resident agreements generally provide for termination of the lease upon death or allow a resident to terminate his or her lease upon the need for a higher level of care not provided at the community. If multiple residents terminate their resident agreements at or
30


around the same time, including as a result of the pandemic, our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow could be adversely affected. In addition, because of the demographics of our typical residents, including age and health, resident turnover rates in our communities are difficult to predict. As a result, the living spaces we lease may be unoccupied for a period of time, which could adversely affect our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

Our ability to use net operating loss carryovers to reduce future tax payments may be limited.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue code contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its net operating loss carryforward and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes involving stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by a company. Any such annual limitations may result in our being unable to utilize all of our net operating loss carryforwards generated in tax years prior to 2018 before their expiration.

Failure to maintain the security and functionality of our information systems and data, to prevent a cybersecurity attack or breach, or to comply with applicable privacy and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA, could adversely affect our business, reputation, and relationships with our residents, patients, employees, and referral sources and subject us to remediation costs, government inquiries, and liabilities, any of which could materially and adversely impact our revenues, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity.

We are dependent on the proper function and availability of our information systems, including hardware, software, applications, and electronic data storage, to store, process, and transmit our business information, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of our residents, patients, and employees. Though we have taken steps to protect the cybersecurity and physical security of our information systems and have implemented policies and procedures to comply with HIPAA and other privacy laws, rules, and regulations, there can be no assurance that our security measures and disaster recovery plan will prevent damage to, or interruption or breach of, our information systems or other unauthorized access to proprietary or private information.

Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. Components of our information systems that we develop or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security or functionality of our information systems. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud or other forms of deceiving our employees or contractors such as email phishing attacks. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our cybersecurity or to investigate and remediate any cybersecurity vulnerabilities, attacks, or incidents.

In addition, we rely on software support of third parties to secure and maintain our information systems. Our inability, or the inability of these third parties, to continue to maintain and upgrade our information systems could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. Costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations.

Failure to maintain the security and functionality of our information systems, to prevent a cybersecurity attack or other unauthorized access to our information systems, or to comply with applicable privacy and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA, could expose us to a number of adverse consequences, many of which are not insurable, including: (i) interruptions to our business, (ii) the theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive information, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of our residents, patients, and employees, (iii) significant remediation costs; (iv) negative publicity which could damage our reputation and our relationships with our residents, patients, employees, and referral sources, (v) litigation and potential liability under privacy, security, and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA, or other applicable laws, rules, or regulations, and (vi) government inquiries which may result in sanctions and other criminal or civil fines or penalties. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely impact our revenues, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity.

31


Failure to complete our capital expenditures in accordance with our plans may adversely affect our anticipated revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

Our planned full-year 2021 non-development capital expenditures include maintenance, renovations, upgrades, and other major building infrastructure projects for our communities. Such projects may be needed to ensure that our communities are in appropriate physical condition to support our strategy and to protect the value of our community portfolio. In addition, our planned full-year 2021 development capital expenditure projects include those for expansion, repositioning, redeveloping, and major renovation of selected existing senior living communities.

Our capital projects are in various stages of planning and development and are subject to a number of factors over which we may have little or no control. These factors include work restrictions at our communities due to COVID-19, the necessity of arranging separate leases, mortgage loans, or other financings to provide the capital required to complete these projects; difficulties or delays in obtaining zoning, land use, building, occupancy, licensing, certificate of need, and other required governmental permits and approvals; failure to complete construction of the projects on budget and on schedule; failure of third-party contractors and subcontractors to perform under their contracts; shortages of labor or materials that could delay projects or make them more expensive; adverse weather conditions that could delay completion of projects; increased costs resulting from general economic conditions or increases in the cost of materials; and increased costs as a result of changes in laws and regulations.

We cannot provide assurance that we will undertake or complete all of our planned capital expenditures, or that we will not experience delays in completing those projects. In addition, we may incur substantial costs prior to achieving stabilized occupancy for certain capital projects and cannot assure that these costs will not be greater than we have anticipated. We also cannot provide assurance that any of our capital projects will be economically successful or provide a return on investment in accordance with our plans or at all. Furthermore, our failure to complete, or delays in completing, our planned community-level capital expenditures could harm the value of our communities and our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

To the extent we identify and pursue any future development, investment, or acquisition opportunities, we may encounter difficulties in identifying opportunities at attractive prices or integrating acquisitions with our operations, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

We may not be able to identify development, investment, and acquisition opportunities on attractive terms and that are compatible with our strategy. To the extent we identify any such opportunities and enter into definitive agreements in connection therewith, we cannot provide assurance that the transactions will be completed. Failure to complete transactions after we have entered into definitive agreements may result in significant expenses to us.

To the extent we identify and close on any such opportunities, the integration of acquired communities or companies into our existing business may result in unforeseen difficulties, divert managerial attention, or require significant financial or other resources. Further, any such closings may require us to incur additional indebtedness and contingent liabilities and may result in unforeseen expenses or compliance issues, which may adversely affect our revenue growth, results of operations, and cash flow. Moreover, any future development, investment, or acquisition transactions may not generate any additional income for us or provide any benefit to our business.

Competition for the acquisition of strategic assets from buyers with greater financial resources or lower costs of capital than us or that have lower return expectations than we do could limit our ability to compete for strategic acquisitions and therefore to grow our business effectively.

There is significant competition among potential acquirers in the senior living industry, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully complete acquisitions, which could limit our ability to grow our business. Several publicly-traded and non-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, and private equity firms have similar asset acquisition objectives as we do, along with greater financial resources and/or lower costs of capital than we are able to obtain. Partially as a result of tax law changes enacted through RIDEA, we now compete more directly with the various publicly-traded healthcare REITs for the acquisition of senior housing properties.

32


Pending disposition transactions are, and any future disposition transactions will be, subject to various closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals where applicable, likely will result in reductions to our revenue, and may negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow.

During 2021, we expect to close on the dispositions of three owned communities classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020 and terminations of a substantial portion of our management arrangements. Over the longer term, we may dispose of owned or leased communities through asset sales and lease terminations and expirations. The closings of any such transactions, or those that we identify in the future, generally are or will be subject to closing conditions, which may include the receipt of regulatory approvals, and we cannot provide assurance that any such transactions will close or, if they do, when the actual closings will occur. The sales price for pending or future dispositions may not meet our expectations due to the underlying performance of such communities or conditions beyond our control, and we may be required to take impairment charges in connection with such sales if the carrying amounts of such assets exceed the proposed sales prices, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Further, we cannot provide assurance that we will be successful in identifying and pursuing disposition opportunities on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. We may be required to pay significant amounts to restructure or terminate leases and we may be required to take charges in connection with such activity, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Completion of the dispositions of communities through sales or lease terminations and the termination of our management arrangements, including pending transactions and those we enter into in the future, likely will result in reductions to our revenue and may negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow. Further, if we are unable to reduce our general and administrative expense with respect to completed dispositions and management arrangement terminations in accordance with our expectations, we may not realize the expected benefits of such transactions, which could negatively impact our anticipated results of operations and cash flow.

Our execution of our strategy may not be successful, and initiatives undertaken to execute on our strategic priorities may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the price of our common stock.

The success of our strategy depends on our ability to successfully identify and implement initiatives to execute on our strategic priorities, as well as factors outside of our control. Such initiatives may not be successful in achieving our expectations or may require more time and resources than expected to implement. There can be no assurance that our strategy or initiatives undertaken to execute on our strategic priorities will be successful and, as a result, such initiatives may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the price of our common stock.

The closing of the pending sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment may not be completed in accordance with our expectations or at all, and may not generate cash proceeds to us in the amount we anticipate, and the pending sale may disrupt our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Closing the sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment, which we expect to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021, is subject to receipt of certain regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement. We cannot provide assurance that such regulatory approvals will be received or that such closing conditions will be satisfied. If the conditions to closing are not satisfied or waived on a timely basis or at all, we may be unable to complete the sale transaction, or such completion may be delayed or completed on terms that are less favorable than set forth in the Purchase Agreement. In the event the transaction does not close, we may have expended significant management resources to complete the transaction and incurred significant transaction costs without obtaining any corresponding benefit, and we may be subject to litigation or obligations for damages. Our inability to close the transaction in accordance with expectations, or at all, may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and stock price. In addition, any significant diversion of management’s or our associates’ attention away from our ongoing business, or loss of associates, due to the pending transaction, or difficulties encountered in transitioning the Health Care Services business, may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Liquidity and Indebtedness

Disruptions in the financial markets or decreases in the appraised values or performances of our communities could affect our ability to obtain financing or to extend or refinance debt as it matures, which could negatively impact our liquidity, financial condition, and the market price of our common stock.

33


As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding $3.9 billion principal amount of mortgage financing and $80.7 million letters of credit. If we are unable to extend or refinance our indebtedness prior to scheduled maturity dates, our liquidity and financial condition could be adversely impacted. Even if we are able to extend or refinance our maturing debt or credit or letter of credit facilities, the terms of the Class I and Class II directors will expire at the annual meeting of stockholdersnew financing may not be as favorable to be held in 2020,us as the terms of the Class III directorsexisting financing. In addition, the amount of mortgage financing available for our communities is generally dependent on their appraised values and performance. Decreases in the appraised values of our communities, including due to adverse changes in real estate market conditions, or their performance, could result in available mortgage refinancing amounts that are less than the communities' maturing indebtedness. Our inability to obtain refinancing proceeds sufficient to cover maturing indebtedness could adversely impact our liquidity, and may cause us to seek alternative sources of financing, which may be less attractive or unavailable.

We are heavily dependent on mortgage financing provided by Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), which are currently operating under a conservatorship begun in 2008 and conducting business under the direction of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Reform efforts related to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may make such financing sources less available or unavailable in the future and may cause us to seek alternative sources of financing, which may be less attractive or unavailable.

Disruptions or prolonged downturns in the financial markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may require us to further adjust our business plan accordingly. These events also may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital, including through the issuance of common stock. Disruptions in the financial markets could have an adverse effect on our business. If we are not able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, we also may have to forgo, delay, or abandon some or all of our planned capital expenditures or any development, investment, or acquisition opportunities that we identify, which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, and cash flow.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments, this could result in defaults of the related debt or leases and cross-defaults under our other debt or lease documents, which would adversely affect our capital structure, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

We have significant indebtedness and lease obligations, and we intend to continue financing our communities through mortgage financing, long-term leases, and other types of financing. Our required lease payments are generally subject to an escalator that is either fixed or tied to changes in the consumer price index or leased property revenue. We cannot give any assurance that we will expiregenerate sufficient cash flow from operations to cover required interest, principal, and lease payments. Any non-payment or other default under our financing arrangements could, subject to cure provisions, cause the lender to foreclose upon the community or communities securing such indebtedness or, in the case of a lease, cause the lessor to terminate the lease, each with a consequent loss of revenue and asset value to us. In some cases, indebtedness is secured by both a mortgage on a community (or communities) and a guaranty by us and/or one or more of our subsidiaries. In the event of a default under one of these scenarios, the lender could avoid judicial procedures required to foreclose on real property by declaring all amounts outstanding under the guaranty immediately due and payable, and requiring the respective guarantor to fulfill its obligations to make such payments. The realization of any of these scenarios would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and capital structure. Because many of our outstanding debt and lease documents contain cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions, a default by us related to one community could affect a significant number of our other communities and their corresponding financing arrangements and leases (including documents with other lenders or lessors). In the event of such a default, we may not be able to obtain a waiver from the lender or lessor on terms acceptable or favorable to us, or at all, which would have a negative impact on our capital structure and financial condition.

Our indebtedness and long-term leases could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to operate our business.

Our level of indebtedness and our long-term leases could adversely affect our future operations and/or impact our stockholders for several reasons, including, without limitation:

We may have little or no cash flow apart from cash flow that is dedicated to the payment of any interest or principal required with respect to outstanding indebtedness and lease payments with respect to our long-term leases;
Increases in our outstanding indebtedness, leverage, and long-term lease obligations will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure;
Increases in our outstanding indebtedness may limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, expansions, repositionings, new developments, acquisitions, general corporate, and other purposes; and
Our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders (should we initiate dividend payments in the future) may be limited.

34


If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt or to make lease payments on our leases, we may be required, among other things, to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets, refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness or leases, sell selected assets, reduce or delay planned capital expenditures, or delay or abandon desirable acquisitions. These measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt or to make lease payments on our leases. The failure to make required payments on our debt or leases could result in an adverse effect on our future ability to generate revenues and our results of operations and cash flow. Any contemplated financing, refinancing, restructuring, or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms to us.

Our debt and lease documents contain financial and other covenants, and any default under such documents could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness and lease obligations, the foreclosure of our mortgaged communities, the termination of our leasehold interests, and/or cross-defaults under our other debt or lease documents, any of which could materially and adversely impact our capital structure, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity and interfere with our ability to pursue our strategy.

Certain of our debt and lease documents contain restrictions and financial covenants, such as those requiring us to maintain prescribed minimum liquidity, net worth, and stockholders' equity levels and debt service and lease coverage ratios, and requiring us not to exceed prescribed leverage ratios, in each case on a consolidated, portfolio-wide, multi-community, single-community, and/or entity basis. Net worth is generally calculated as stockholders' equity, as calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and in certain circumstances, reduced by intangible assets or liabilities or increased by deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions and deferred entrance fee revenue. The debt service and lease coverage ratios are generally calculated as revenues less operating expenses, including an implied management fee and a reserve for capital expenditures, divided by the debt (principal and interest) or lease payment. In addition, our debt and lease documents generally contain non-financial covenants, such as those requiring us to comply with Medicare or Medicaid provider requirements and maintain insurance coverage.

Our failure to comply with applicable covenants could constitute an event of default under the applicable debt or lease documents. Many of our debt and lease documents contain cross-default provisions so that a default under one of these instruments could cause a default under other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders and lessors).

These restrictions and covenants may interfere with our ability to obtain financing or to engage in other business activities, which may inhibit our ability to pursue our strategy. In addition, certain of our outstanding indebtedness and leases limit or restrict, among other things, our ability and our subsidiaries' ability to borrow additional funds, engage in a change in control transaction, dispose of all or substantially all of our or their assets, or engage in mergers or other business combinations without consent of the applicable lender or lessor. In certain circumstances, the consent of the applicable lender or, if certain objective conditions are not satisfied, lessor may be based on the lender's or lessor's sole discretion. Our inability to obtain the consent of applicable lenders and landlords in connection with our pursuit of any such transactions may forestall our ability to consummate such transactions. Furthermore, the costs of obtaining such consents may reduce the value that our stockholders may realize in any such transactions.

The substantial majority of our lease arrangements are structured as master leases. Under a master lease, numerous communities are leased through an indivisible lease. We typically guarantee the performance and lease payment obligations of our subsidiary lessees under the master leases. Due to the nature of such master leases, it is difficult to restructure the composition of our leased portfolios or economic terms of the leases without the consent of the applicable landlord. In addition, an event of default related to an individual property or limited number of properties within a master lease portfolio could result in a default on the entire master lease portfolio.

Furthermore, our debt and leases are secured by our communities and, in certain cases, a guaranty by us and/or one or more of our subsidiaries. Therefore, if an event of default has occurred under any of our debt or lease documents, subject to cure provisions in certain instances, the respective lender or lessor would have the right to declare all the related outstanding amounts of indebtedness or cash lease obligations immediately due and payable, to foreclose on our mortgaged communities, to terminate our leasehold interests, to foreclose on other collateral securing the indebtedness and leases, to discontinue our operation of leased communities, and/or to pursue other remedies available to such lender or lessor. Further, an event of default could trigger cross-default provisions in our other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders or lessors). We cannot provide assurance that we would be able to pay the debt or lease obligations if they became due upon acceleration following an event of default.

In addition, certain of our master leases and management agreements contain radius restrictions, which limit our ability to own, develop, or acquire new communities within a specified distance from certain existing communities covered by such
35


agreements. These radius restrictions could negatively affect our ability to expand or develop or acquire senior housing communities and operating companies.

Lease obligations and mortgage debt expose us to increased risk of loss of property, which could harm our ability to generate future revenues and could have an adverse tax effect.

Lease obligations and mortgage debt increase our risk of loss because defaults on leases or indebtedness secured by properties may result in lease terminations by lessors and foreclosure actions by lenders. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds, which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow. Further, because many of our outstanding debt and lease documents contain cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions, a default by us related to one community could affect a significant number of our other communities and their corresponding financing arrangements and leases.

In addition, our leases generally provide for renewal or extension options and, in certain cases, purchase options. We expect to renew, extend, or exercise purchase options with respect to our leases in the normal course of business; however, there can be no assurance that these rights will be exercised in the future or that we will be able to satisfy the conditions precedent to exercising any such renewal, extension, or purchase options. Furthermore, the terms of any such purchase options that are based on fair market value are inherently uncertain and could be unacceptable or unfavorable to us depending on the circumstances at the annual meetingtime of stockholdersexercise. If we are not able to renew or extend our existing leases, or purchase the communities subject to such leases, at or prior to the end of the existing lease terms, or if the terms of such options are unfavorable or unacceptable to us, our business, results of operations, and cash flow could be adversely affected.

Increases in market interest rates could significantly increase the costs of our debt obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

Our variable-rate debt obligations and any such obligations incurred in the future expose us to interest rate risk. In the normal course of business, we enter into interest rate agreements with major financial institutions to manage our risk above certain interest rates on variable rate debt. These agreements only limit our exposure to increases in interest rates above certain levels and generally must be renewed every two to three years. Increases in prevailing interest rates will increase our payment obligations on our existing variable-rate obligations to the extent they are unhedged and may increase our future borrowing and hedging costs, which would negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow.

The potential phasing out of LIBOR may increase the interest costs of our debt obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

The interest rates for substantially all of our variable-rate debt obligations are calculated based on the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread, and our interest rate cap agreements are indexed to LIBOR. LIBOR is administered by the ICE Benchmark Administration, which has announced that it plans to phase-out one week and two month LIBOR by the end of 2021 and the other LIBOR tenors by June 30, 2023. If LIBOR were to be discontinued, substantially all of our variable-rate debt agreements provide that the lender may choose an alternative index based on comparable information, and our interest rate cap agreements provide that the calculation agent may choose an alternative index. It is unclear whether LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will evolve by the applicable phase-out dates, or whether alternative and comparable index rates will be established and adopted by our lenders and other financial institutions. If LIBOR ceases to exist or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change, interest rates on our variable-rate debt obligations may increase or become more volatile, which would adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

We may need additional capital to fund our operations, capital expenditure plans, and strategic priorities, and we may not be able to obtain it on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Funding our capital expenditure plans, pursuing any acquisition, investment, development, or potential lease restructuring opportunities that we identify, or funding investments to support our strategy may require additional capital. Financing may not be available to us or may be available to us only on terms that are not favorable. In addition, certain of our outstanding indebtedness and long-term leases restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt. If we are unable to raise additional funds or obtain them on terms acceptable to us, we may have to delay or abandon some or all of our plans or opportunities. Further, if additional funds are raised through the issuance of additional equity securities, the percentage
36


ownership of our stockholders would be diluted. Any newly issued equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of our common stock.

Human Capital

The transition of management or unexpected departure of our key officers could harm our business.

We are dependent on the efforts of our senior management. The transition of management, the unforeseen loss or limited availability of the services of any of our executive leaders, or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could, at least temporarily, have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

Increased competition for, or a shortage of, personnel, wage pressures resulting from increased competition, low unemployment levels, increased unemployment benefits, minimum wage increases, changes in overtime laws, and union activity may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and cash flow.

Our success depends on our ability to retain and attract qualified management and other personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of each of our communities. We compete with various healthcare service providers, other senior living providers, and hospitality and food services companies in retaining and attracting qualified personnel. Increased competition for, or a shortage of, nurses, or other personnel (including due to the pandemic), low levels of unemployment, increased unemployment benefits, or general inflationary pressures have required and may require in the future that we enhance our pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel. In addition, we have experienced and may continue to experience wage pressures due to minimum wage increases mandated by state and local laws and the increase in the minimum salary threshold for overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which the Department of Labor increased effective January 1, 2020. Changes to minimum wage laws may result in higher operating costs, and we may not be able to offset the added costs resulting from competitive, inflationary or regulatory pressures by increasing the rates we charge to our residents or our service charges, which would negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow.

Turnover rates of our personnel and the magnitude of the shortage of nurses or other personnel varies substantially from market to market. If we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel, our ability to conduct our business operations effectively, our overall operating results, and cash flow could be harmed.

In addition, efforts by labor unions to unionize any of our community personnel could divert management attention, lead to increases in our labor costs, and/or reduce our flexibility with respect to certain workplace rules. If we experience an increase in organizing activity, if onerous collective bargaining agreement terms are imposed upon us, or if we otherwise experience an increase in our staffing and labor costs, our results of operations and cash flow would be negatively affected.

Regulatory, Compliance, and Legal

Environmental contamination at any of our communities could result in substantial liabilities to us, which may exceed the value of the underlying assets and which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property, such as us, may be held liable in 2021,certain circumstances for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of, or related to the release of, certain hazardous or toxic substances, that could be located on, in, at, or under a property, regardless of how such materials came to be located there. The cost of any required investigation, remediation, removal, mitigation, compliance, fines, or personal or property damages and our liability therefore could exceed the property's value and/or our assets' value. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate the damage caused by such substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell such property, to attract additional residents and retain existing residents, to borrow using such property as collateral, or to develop or redevelop such property. In addition, such laws impose liability, which may be joint and several, for investigation, remediation, removal, and mitigation costs on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at third party sites. Such laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence, release, or disposal of such substances as well as without regard to whether such release or disposal was in compliance with law at the time it occurred. Although we do not believe that we have incurred such liabilities as would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, we could be subject to substantial future liability for environmental contamination that we have no knowledge about as of the date of this report and/or for which we may not be at fault.
37



Failure to comply with existing environmental laws could result in increased expenditures, litigation, and potential loss to our business and in our asset value, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Our operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, including those relating to: the handling, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of medical waste products generated at our communities; identification and warning of the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, as well as removal of such materials; the presence of other substances in the indoor environment; and protection of the environment and natural resources in connection with development or construction of our properties.

Some of our communities generate infectious or other hazardous medical waste due to the illness or physical condition of the residents. Our communities’ engagement of waste management companies for the proper disposal of all infectious medical waste does not immunize us from alleged violations of such laws for operations for which we are responsible even if carried out by such waste management companies, nor does it immunize us from third-party claims for the cost to cleanup disposal sites at which such wastes have been disposed.

Federal regulations require building owners and those exercising control over a building's management to identify and warn their employees and certain other employers operating in the building of potential hazards posed by workplace exposure to installed asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials in their buildings. Significant fines can be assessed for violation of these regulations. Building owners and those exercising control over a building's management may be subject to an increased risk of personal injury lawsuits. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations also govern the removal, encapsulation, disturbance, handling, and/or disposal of asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials when such materials are in poor condition or in the event of construction, remodeling, renovation, or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose liability for improper handling or a release to the environment of asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials and may provide for fines to, and for third parties to seek recovery from, owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or improper work exposure associated with asbestos-containing materials and potential asbestos-containing materials.

The presence of mold, lead-based paint, contaminants in drinking water, radon, and/or other substances at any of the communities we own or may acquire may lead to the incurrence of costs for remediation, mitigation, or the implementation of an operations and maintenance plan and may result in third party litigation for personal injury or property damage. Furthermore, in some circumstances, areas affected by mold may be unusable for periods of time for repairs, and even after successful remediation, the known prior presence of extensive mold could adversely affect the ability of a community to retain or attract residents and could adversely affect a community's market value.

Although we believe that we are currently in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, if we fail to comply with such laws in the future, we would face increased expenditures both in terms of fines and remediation of the underlying problem(s), potential litigation relating to exposure to such materials, and potential decrease in value to our business and in the value of our underlying assets. Therefore, our failure to comply with existing environmental laws would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state, and local environmental regulation and legislation. Changes in the environmental regulatory framework (including legislative or regulatory efforts designed to address climate change) could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, because environmental laws vary from state to state, expansion of our operations to states where we do not currently operate may subject us to additional restrictions on the manner in which we operate our communities.

Significant legal actions and liability claims against us, including class action and stockholder derivative complaints, could subject us to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We have been and are currently involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business, which we believe are generally comparable to other companies in the senior living and healthcare industries, including, but not limited to, putative class action claims from time to time regarding staffing at our communities and compliance with consumer protection laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Certain claims and lawsuits allege large damage amounts and may require significant costs to defend and resolve. As a result, we maintain general liability, professional liability, and other insurance policies in amounts and with coverage and deductibles we believe are appropriate, based on the nature and risks of our business, historical
38


experience, availability, and industry standards. Our current policies provide for deductibles for each claim and contain various exclusions from coverage. Effective December 31, 2020, we began using our wholly-owned captive insurance company for the purpose of insuring certain portions of our risk retention under our general and professional liability insurance programs. Accordingly, we are, in effect, self-insured for claims that are less than the deductible amounts and for claims that exceed the funding level of our captive, and for claims or portions of claims that are not covered by such policies and/or exceed the policy limits. If we experience a greater number of losses than we anticipate, or if certain claims are not covered by insurance, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The senior living and healthcare services businesses entail an inherent risk of liability, particularly given the demographics of our residents and patients, including age and health, and the services we provide. In recent years, we, as well as other participants in our industry, have been subject to an increasing number of claims and lawsuits alleging that our services have resulted in resident injury or other adverse effects. Many of these lawsuits involve large damage claims and significant legal costs. The frequency and magnitude of such alleged claims and legal costs may increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic or our response efforts. Many states continue to consider tort reform and how it will apply to the senior living industry. We may continue to be faced with the threat of large jury verdicts in jurisdictions that do not find favor with large senior living or healthcare providers. There can be no guarantee that we will not have any claims that exceed our policy limits in the future, which could subject us to substantial uninsured liabilities.

If a successful claim is made against us and it is not covered by our insurance or exceeds the policy limits, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In some states, state law may prohibit or limit insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation. As a result, we may be liable for punitive damage awards in these states that either are not covered or are in excess of our insurance policy limits. Also, our insurance policies' deductibles, or self-insured retention, are accrued based on an actuarial projection of future liabilities. If these projections are inaccurate and if there is an unexpectedly large number of successful claims that result in liabilities in excess of our accrued reserves, our operating results could be negatively affected. Claims against us, regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, also could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attract residents or expand our business and could require our management to devote time to matters unrelated to the day-to-day operation of our business. We also have to renew our policies every year and negotiate terms for coverage, exposing us to the volatility of the insurance markets, including the possibility of rate increases and changes in coverage and other terms. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain liability insurance in the future or, if available, that such coverage will be available on acceptable terms.

We face periodic and routine reviews, audits, and investigations by government agencies, and any adverse findings could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

The senior living and healthcare industries are continuously subject to scrutiny by governmental regulators, which could result in reviews, audits, investigations, enforcement actions, or litigation related to regulatory compliance matters. In addition, we are subject to various government reviews, audits, and investigations to verify our compliance with Medicare and Medicaid programs and other applicable laws and regulations. CMS has engaged a number of third party firms, including Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC), Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC), and Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPIC), to conduct extensive reviews of claims data to evaluate the appropriateness of billings submitted for payment. Audit contractors may identify overpayments based on coverage requirements, billing and coding rules, or other risk areas. In addition to identifying overpayments, audit contractors can refer suspected violations of law to government enforcement authorities. An adverse determination of government reviews, audits, and investigations may result in citations, sanctions, and other criminal or civil fines and penalties, the refund of overpayments, payment suspensions, and termination of participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs, and/or damage to our business reputation. Our costs to respond to and defend any such audits, reviews, and investigations may be significant and are likely to increase in the current enforcement environment, and any resulting sanctions or criminal, civil, or regulatory penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

The cost and difficulty of complying with increasing and evolving regulation and enforcement could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and cash flow.

The regulatory environment surrounding the senior living industry continues to evolve and intensify in the amount and type of laws and regulations affecting it, many of which vary from state to state. In addition, many senior living communities are subject to regulation and licensing by state and local health and social service agencies and other regulatory authorities. In several of the states in which we operate there are different levels of care that may be provided based on the level of licensure. Several of the states in which we operate, or intend to operate, assisted living and memory care communities, home health and
39


hospice agencies, and/or skilled nursing facilities require a certificate of need before the community or agency may be opened or the services at an existing community may be expanded. These regulatory requirements, and the increased enforcement thereof, could affect our ability to expand into new markets, to expand our services and communities in existing markets, and if any of our presently licensed communities were to operate outside of its licensing authority, may subject us to penalties including closure of the community. See "Item 1. Business-Industry Regulation" for more information regarding regulation and enforcement in our industry.

Federal, state, and local officials are increasingly focusing their efforts on enforcement of these laws and regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-community providers like us. Future regulatory developments as well as mandatory increases in the scope and severity of deficiencies determined by survey or inspection officials could cause our operations to suffer. We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state, and local legislation or regulation. If regulatory requirements increase, whether through enactment of new laws or regulations or changes in the enforcement of existing rules, our business, results of operations, and cash flow could be adversely affected.

The intensified regulatory and enforcement environment impacts providers like us because of the increase in the number of inspections or surveys by governmental authorities and consequent citations for failure to comply with regulatory requirements. We also expend considerable resources to respond to federal and state investigations or other enforcement action. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we receive deficiency reports from state and federal regulatory bodies resulting from such inspections or surveys. Although most inspection deficiencies are resolved through a plan of corrective action, the reviewing agency may have the authority to take further action against a licensed or certified facility, which could result in the imposition of fines, imposition of a provisional or conditional license, suspension or revocation of a license, suspension or denial of admissions, loss of certification as a provider under federal reimbursement programs, or imposition of other sanctions, including criminal penalties. Furthermore, certain states may allow citations in one community to impact other communities in the state. Revocation of a license at a given community could therefore impact our ability to obtain new licenses or to renew existing licenses at other communities, which may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults. The failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements could result in a material adverse effect to our business as a whole.

There are various extremely complex federal and state laws governing a wide array of referrals, relationships, and arrangements and prohibiting fraud by healthcare providers, including those in the senior living industry, and governmental agencies are devoting increasing attention and resources to such anti-fraud initiatives. Some examples are the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, and the False Claims Act, which gives private individuals the ability to bring an action on behalf of the federal government. The violation of any of these laws or regulations may result in the imposition of fines or other penalties that could increase our costs and otherwise jeopardize our business. Because of incentives allowing a private individual to bring a claim on behalf of the federal government, so-called "whistleblower" suits have become more frequent.

Additionally, since we operate communities and agencies that participate in federal and/or state healthcare reimbursement programs, we are subject to federal and state laws that prohibit anyone from presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for reimbursement which are false, fraudulent, or are for items or services that were not provided as claimed. Similar state laws vary from state to state. Violation of any of these laws can result in loss of licensure, citations, sanctions, and other criminal or civil fines and penalties, the refund of overpayments, payment suspensions, or termination of participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs, which may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults.

We are subject to certain federal and state laws that regulate financial arrangements by healthcare providers, such as the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, the Stark laws, and certain state referral laws. Authorities have interpreted the Federal Anti-Kickback Law very broadly to apply to many practices and relationships between healthcare providers and sources of patient referral. If we were to violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, we may face criminal penalties and civil sanctions, including fines and possible exclusion from government reimbursement programs, which may also cause us to default under our debt and lease documents and/or trigger cross-defaults. Adverse consequences may also result if we violate federal Stark laws related to certain Medicare and Medicaid physician referrals. While we endeavor to comply with all laws that regulate the licensure and operation of our business, it is difficult to predict how our revenues could be affected if we were subject to an action alleging such violations.

We are subject to federal and state laws, regulations and executive orders relating to healthcare providers’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These requirements vary based on provider type and jurisdiction but generally include mandatory requirements for testing of residents and/or staff, implementation of infection control standards and procedures, imposition of restrictions on new admissions or readmissions of residents, requiring screening of all persons entering a community, imposition of restrictions or limitations on who and how residents may be visited, and imposition of mandatory notification
40


requirements to residents, families, staff and regulatory bodies related to positive COVID-19 cases. Enhanced or additional penalties may apply for violation of such requirements.

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act, safety and health standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other fire, safety, health, and other regulations may require us to make unanticipated expenditures, which could increase our costs and therefore adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our communities, or portions thereof, may be subject to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for "public accommodations" and "commercial properties," but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. If applicable, compliance with ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers and non-compliance could result in imposition of government fines or an award of damages to private litigants.

We must also comply with the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits us from discriminating against individuals on certain bases in any of our practices if it would cause such individuals to face barriers in gaining residency in any of our communities. Additionally, the Fair Housing Act and other state laws require that we advertise our services in such a way that we promote diversity and not limit it. We may be required, among other things, to change our marketing techniques to comply with these requirements.

In addition, we are required to operate our communities in compliance with applicable safety and health standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other fire, health, and safety regulations, building codes and other land use regulations, and food licensing or certification requirements as they may be adopted by governmental agencies and bodies from time to time. Like other healthcare facilities, senior living communities are subject to periodic survey or inspection by governmental authorities to assess and assure compliance with regulatory requirements. Surveys occur on a regular (often annual or bi-annual) schedule, and special surveys may result from a specific complaint filed by a resident, a family member, or one of our competitors. We may be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with those requirements.

Legislation was adopted in the State of Florida in March 2018 that requires skilled nursing homes and assisted living communities in Florida to obtain generators and fuel necessary to sustain operations and maintain comfortable temperatures in the event of a power outage. Our cost to comply with this legislation has been approximately $20 million without a corresponding increase in our revenues. If other states or jurisdictions were to adopt similar legislation or regulation, the cost to comply with such requirements may be substantial and may not result in any additional revenues.

The increased costs and capital expenditures that we may incur in order to comply with any of the above would result in a negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Corporate Organization and Structure

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents may delay, deter, or prevent a tender offer, merger, or acquisition that investors may consider favorable.

Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may delay, deter, or prevent a tender offer, merger, or acquisition that investors may consider favorable or prevent the removal of our current board of directors. Such provisions include:

provisions allowing the Board of Directors to issue blank-check preferred stock;
provisions preventing stockholders from calling special meetings or acting by written consent;
advance notice requirements for stockholders with respect to director nomineesnominations and actions to be taken at annual meetings; and
no provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock can elect all the directors standing for electionelection.

Additionally, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which restricts certain business combinations with interested stockholders in certain situations, will not apply to us.
41


We are a holding company with no operations and rely on our operating subsidiaries to provide us with funds necessary to meet our financial obligations.

We are a holding company with no material direct operations. Our principal assets are the equity interests we directly or indirectly hold in our operating subsidiaries. As a result, we are dependent on loans, distributions, and other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations. Our subsidiaries are legally distinct from us and have no obligation to make funds available to us.

Other Market Factors

Various factors, including general economic conditions and the spread of contagious illnesses, could adversely affect our financial performance and other aspects of our business.

General economic conditions, such as inflation, the consumer price index, commodity costs, fuel and other energy costs, costs of salaries, wages, benefits and insurance, interest rates, and tax rates, affect our facility operating, facility lease, general and administrative and other expenses, and we have no control or limited ability to control such factors. Current global economic conditions and uncertainties, including due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the potential for failures or realignments of financial institutions, and the related impact on available credit may affect us and our business partners, landlords, counterparties, and residents or prospective residents in an adverse manner including, but not limited to, reducing access to liquid funds or credit, increasing the cost of credit, limiting our ability to manage interest rate risk, increasing the risk that certain of our business partners, landlords or counterparties would be unable to fulfill their obligations to us, and other impacts which we are unable to fully anticipate. In addition to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our occupancy, seasonal contagious illnesses such as cold and flu, which typically more severely impact seniors than the general population may negatively affect our occupancy. The continued COVID-19 pandemic, severe cold and flu season, or an outbreak of other contagious disease in the markets in which we operate could result in a regulatory ban on admissions, decreased occupancy, and otherwise adversely affect our business.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our stockholders.

The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, stockholders may be unable to resell their shares at or afterabove their purchase price. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in the 2019 annual meetingfuture. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price, result in fluctuations in the price, or trading volume of our common stock include:

variations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow;
changes in our operating performance and liquidity guidance;
the contents of published research reports about us or the senior living, healthcare, or real estate industries or the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
any increased indebtedness we may incur or lease obligations we may enter into in the future;
actions by institutional stockholders;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments;
speculation or reports by the press or investment community with respect to us, other senior living operators or healthcare providers, or the senior living, healthcare, or real estate industries in general;
proxy contests or other stockholder activism;
increases in market interest rates that may lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield;
downturns in the real estate market or changes in market valuations of senior living communities;
changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations affecting the senior living and healthcare industries or enforcement of these laws and regulations, or announcements relating to these matters; and
general market and economic conditions.

42


Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by offering additional debt or equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes, convertible securities, series of preferred shares, or shares of our common stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and preferred stock, and lenders with respect to other borrowings, would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Shares of our preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their shareholdings in us.

We may issue all of the shares of our common stock that are authorized but unissued (and not otherwise reserved for issuance under our stock incentive or purchase plans) without any action or approval by our stockholders. We may issue shares of common stock in connection with development, investment, and acquisition opportunities, including de novo development, acquisitions of senior living communities and operating companies, and expansion of our healthcare services business. Any shares issued in connection with our acquisitions or otherwise would dilute the holdings of our current stockholders.

Actions of activist stockholders could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management's attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow, and the market price of our common stock.

We value constructive input from our stockholders and engage in dialogue with our stockholders regarding our governance practices, strategy, and performance. However, activist stockholders may disagree with the composition of our Board of Directors or management, our strategy, or capital allocation decisions and may seek to effect change through various strategies that range from private engagement to public campaigns, proxy contests, efforts to force proposals, or transactions not supported by our Board of Directors and litigation. Responding to these actions may be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations, divert the attention of our Board of Directors, management, and our associates and interfere with our ability to pursue our strategy and to attract and retain qualified Board and executive leadership. The perceived uncertainty as to our future direction that may result from actions of activist stockholders may also negatively impact our ability to attract and retain residents at our communities. We cannot provide assurance that constructive engagement with our stockholders will be successful. Any such stockholder activism may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow, and the market price of our common stock.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.    Properties

Communities

As of December 31, 2020, we operated and managed 726 communities across 43 states, with the capacity to serve approximately 64,000 residents. As of December 31, 2020, we owned 350 communities, leased 301 communities, managed 72 communities on behalf of third parties, and managed three communities for which we have an equity interest. Substantially all of our owned communities are subject to mortgage debt. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our owned, leased, and managed communities as of December 31, 2020, or, for occupancy, represents the weighted average occupancy for December 2020.

Number of Communities
StateUnitsOwnedLeasedManagedTotal
Texas9,023 56 19 17 92 
California6,961 26 20 12 58 
Florida6,384 44 29 76 
North Carolina3,401 50 — 57 
43


Number of Communities
StateUnitsOwnedLeasedManagedTotal
Colorado3,380 13 11 29 
Illinois3,027 15 
Ohio2,971 15 15 36 
Washington2,833 15 18 — 33 
Arizona2,153 17 27 
Oregon1,805 12 11 — 23 
Michigan1,678 22 — 31 
New York1,500 10 21 
Tennessee1,494 16 23 
Virginia1,206 12 
New Jersey1,147 13 
Kansas1,114 10 — 18 
Oklahoma979 15 23 
Missouri913 — 
Massachusetts899 — 
Indiana830 
Alabama804 — — 
Pennsylvania766 — 10 
Georgia717 — 
Wisconsin712 14 
Connecticut636 
South Carolina611 11 
Maryland560 — 
Idaho548 — 
Minnesota538 — 12 — 12 
Rhode Island532 — 
Arkansas494 — 
Louisiana486 — — 
New Mexico457 
Mississippi386 — — 
Kentucky283 — — 
Nevada256 — — 
Montana137 — 
Delaware105 — — 
Vermont101 — — 
West Virginia93 — — 
New Hampshire90 — — 
Utah55 — — 
Wyoming46 — — 
Total63,111 350 301 75 726 
Occupancy rate (weighted average)70.4 %73.2 %70.5 %71.4 %

Corporate Offices

Our main corporate offices are leased, including our 107,713 square foot headquarters in Brentwood, Tennessee and our 156,016 square foot office in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

44


Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

The information contained in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

45


PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol "BKD". As of February 22, 2021, there were approximately 352 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

On December 30, 2008, our Board of Directors voted to suspend our quarterly cash dividend indefinitely. We may determine to pay a regular quarterly dividend to the holders of our common stock in the future, but in the near term, we anticipate deploying capital to, among other uses, fund: planned capital expenditures; any acquisition, investment, development, or potential lease restructuring opportunities that we identify; investments to support our strategy; or reductions to our debt and lease leverage.

Our ability to pay and maintain cash dividends in the future will be based on many factors, including then-existing contractual restrictions or limitations, our ability to execute our strategy, our ability to negotiate favorable lease and other contractual terms, anticipated operating expense levels, our capital expenditure plans, the level of demand for our units, occupancy rates, the rates we charge, and our liquidity position. Some of the factors are beyond our control and a change in any such factor could affect our ability to pay or maintain dividends. We can give no assurance as to our ability to pay or maintain dividends in the future. As we have done in the past, we may also pay dividends in the future that exceed our net income for the relevant period as calculated in accordance with GAAP.


46


Share Price Performance Graph

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return for Brookdale common stock with the comparable cumulative return of the Russell 3000 and S&P Health Care Indices.

The graph assumes that a person invested $100 in Brookdale stock and each of the indices on December 31, 2015 and that dividends are reinvested. The comparisons in this graph are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of Brookdale shares or such indices.
bkd-20201231_g2.gif
 12/1512/1612/1712/1812/1912/20
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.$100.00 $67.28 $52.55 $36.29 $39.38 $24.00 
Russell 3000100.00 112.74 136.56 129.40 169.54 204.95 
S&P Health Care100.00 97.31 118.79 126.47 152.81 173.36 

The performance graph and related information shall not be deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and do not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate them by reference into such filing.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None during the quarter ended December 31, 2020.

47


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table contains information regarding purchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2020 by or on behalf of us or any ''affiliated purchaser,'' as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act:
Period
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
Approximate Dollar Value of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs ($ in thousands) (2)
10/1/2020 - 10/31/2020— $— — $44,026 
11/1/2020 - 11/30/20206,311 $4.04 — $44,026 
12/1/2020 - 12/31/2020— $— — $44,026 
Total6,311 $4.04 — 

(1)Consists entirely of shares withheld to satisfy tax liabilities due upon the vesting of restricted stock. The average price paid per share for such share withholding is based on the closing price per share on the vesting date of the restricted stock or, if such date is not a trading day, the trading day immediately prior to such vesting date.
(2)On November 1, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase up to $100.0 million in the aggregate of our common stock. The share repurchase program is intended to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or block trades, or by any combination of such methods, in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. The size, scope, and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market, and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory, and contractual requirements, and capital availability. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be suspended, modified, or discontinued at any time at our discretion without prior notice. Shares of stock repurchased under the program will be held as treasury shares. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $44.0 million remained available under the repurchase program.

Item 6.    (Removed and Reserved).

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, which could cause actual results to differ materially from management's expectations. See additional risks and uncertainties described in "Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995" for more information. Factors that could cause such differences include those described in this section and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Overview and Recent Developments

Our Business

As of December 31, 2020, we are the largest operator of senior living communities in the United States based on total capacity, with 726 communities in 43 states and the ability to serve approximately 64,000 residents. We offer our residents access to a broad continuum of services across the most attractive sectors of the senior living industry. We operate and manage independent living, assisted living, memory care, and CCRCs. We also offer a range of home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to more than 17,000 patients as of that date.

Our community and service offerings combine housing with hospitality and healthcare services. Our senior living communities offer residents a supportive home-like setting, assistance with ADLs such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring/walking, and, in certain communities, licensed skilled nursing services. We also provide home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to residents of many of our communities and to seniors living outside of our communities. By providing residents with a range of service options as their needs change, we provide greater continuity of care, enabling seniors to age-in-place, which we believe enables them to maintain residency with us for a longer period of time. The ability of residents to age-in-place is also beneficial to our residents and their families who are concerned with care decisions for their elderly relatives.
48


Strategy

Our goal is to be the first choice in senior living by being the nation's most trusted and effective senior living provider and employer. We believe there are significant opportunities to create and deliver stockholder value as we execute on our strategy to achieve this goal. We continue to execute our core operational strategy that we initiated in early 2018, and we believe successful execution on that strategy provides the best opportunity for us to navigate and recover from the pandemic and to create stockholder value. We have supplemented our operational strategy with initiatives intended to complement and enhance our core operational efforts and to position us for future growth and success as we encounter changes and trends in demographics, customer preferences, technology, and healthcare delivery and outcomes. Our refined strategy is focused on these priorities:

Continued Operational Improvement and Efficiency. We are focused on our core senior living communities and intend to continue to drive operational improvements. Through our "win locally" initiative, we intend to provide choices for high quality care and personalized service by caring associates while leveraging our industry-leading scale and experience. Such efforts include optimizing our sales and marketing processes, prioritizing communities with the most opportunities for growth, and ensuring that our communities and their programming are competitive in the market. We also continue to focus on attracting, engaging, developing, and retaining the best associates by maintaining a compelling value proposition in the areas of leadership, career development, and meaningful work. We believe engaged associates lead to lower turnover, improved operations, and ultimately an enhanced resident experience that drives accelerated growth. To sharpen our focus on our core senior living operations, we are (and have been) executing on initiatives to reduce the complexity of our business and to ensure appropriate risk-reward tradeoffs in our highly regulated product lines. Such initiatives include exiting substantially all our entry fee CCRC business in 2020 (which also significantly reduced the number of skilled nursing facilities we operate) and continuing to optimize our management services business.

Senior Living Portfolio. Since initiating our operational turnaround strategy in early 2018, we have continued our portfolio optimization initiative through which we have disposed of owned and leased communities and restructured leases. Such transactions have included restructuring our leases with our three largest landlords, sales and conveyance of owned communities, and dispositions of substantially all of our remaining ownership interests in unconsolidated ventures, including our entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak. As we move forward in 2021, we intend to continue to (i) expand our footprint and services in core markets where we have, or can achieve, a clear leadership position, (ii) execute an ongoing capital recycling program through acquiring leased or managed communities and exiting underperforming owned assets or leases when possible, and (iii) pivot back to portfolio growth through targeted development, investment, and acquisition opportunities. We will continue to invest in our development capital expenditures program through which we expand, renovate, reposition, and redevelop selected existing senior living communities where economically advantageous, although at a reduced pace during the pandemic.

Expansion of Healthcare and Service Platform. Our vision is to enable those we serve to live well by offering our residents the highest-quality healthcare and wellness platform in the senior living industry. We intend to further integrate our healthcare service model in certain markets in 2021. We also intend to pursue initiatives designed to accelerate growth in our healthcare services offered to residents within our communities and private duty services business. Such initiatives may include implementation of improvements to our sales and marketing efforts associated with our healthcare services, pursuit of additional or expanded relationships with managed care providers, and further development of healthcare relationships to capitalize on growth opportunities. We believe the successful execution of these initiatives and our healthcare strategy will drive incremental revenue by increasing move-ins, improving resident health and wellbeing, and as a result extend residents' average length of stay and increase occupancy. We also believe that we will improve the results of operations as we further develop as a partner of choice for healthcare service or payor organizations seeking to provide services within our communities and/or improve health outcomes at an overall lower cost of care.

Driving Innovation and Leveraging Technology. We are engaged in a variety of innovation initiatives and over time plan to pilot and test new ideas, technologies, and operating models in order to enhance our residents' engagement and experience, improve outcomes, and increase average length of stay and occupancy. With our technology platform, we also expect to identify solutions to reduce complexity, increase productivity, lower costs, and increase our ability to collaborate with third parties.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and likely will continue to adversely impact the senior living industry and our business. Due to the average age and prevalence of chronic medical conditions among our residents and patients, they generally are at disproportionately higher risk of hospitalization and adverse outcomes if they contract COVID-19. We continue
49


to serve and care for seniors at our communities and their homes through the pandemic. A significant portion of our corporate support associates have worked from home since March 2020.

The health and wellbeing of our residents, patients, and associates is and has been our highest priority. We initiated our COVID-19 preparation efforts in January 2020. Our response efforts center on infection prevention and control protocols, including following requirements and guidance of federal, state, and local governments and agencies, including the CDC and the CMS. We have enhanced and reinforced training our associates in such protocols and continue to actively monitor government requirements and guidance and adapt our policies, procedures, and response efforts when applicable. Upon confirmation of positive COVID-19 exposure at a community, we take actions intended to minimize further exposure, including associates' adhering to personal protection protocols, isolating residents or finding placement in an alternate care setting to best address their care needs, and in some cases, restricting new resident admissions, as directed by local health authorities.

Seeking to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into our communities, and to help control further exposure to infections within communities, in March 2020 we began restricting visitors at all our communities to essential healthcare personnel and certain compassionate care situations, screening associates and permitted visitors, suspending group outings, modifying communal dining and programming to comply with social distancing guidelines and, in most cases, implementing in-room only dining and activities programming, requesting that residents refrain from leaving the community unless medically necessary, and requiring new residents and residents returning from a hospital or nursing home to isolate in their apartment for fourteen days. These restrictions were in place across our portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2020. We have adopted a framework for determining when to ease restrictions at each of our communities based on several criteria, including regulatory requirements and guidance, completion of baseline testing at the community, and the presence of current confirmed positive COVID-19 cases. Under this framework, we began easing restrictions on a community-by-community basis in July 2020 where regulatory requirements and guidance allowed, which easing may have included permitting outdoor, and in some cases, indoor visits with families, reduced capacity or socially distanced communal dining, limited communal activities programming, and in-person prospective resident visits. Although we are hopeful that administration of the vaccine to our residents and associates will enable us to further ease restrictions at our communities, those restrictions may continue for some time, and we may revert to more restrictive measures if the pandemic worsens, as necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, or at the direction of state or local health authorities.

In April 2020, we proactively commenced a resident and associate testing program for our communities. We undertook the program to identify positive, including asymptomatic, individuals, to better understand how our infection protocols are working, to help minimize the exposure to residents and associates of someone known to be COVID-19 positive, and in some cases to comply with state and local testing requirements. In July 2020, we completed baseline testing at all of our communities, and we have continued testing residents and associates at many of our communities. We also continue to utilize rapid point of care antigen test kits supplied by HHS at those of our communities with CLIA waivers. Our testing program has accumulated approximately 320,000 test results. Approximately 1.2% of our residents were known to have current COVID-19 positive test results on February 22, 2021. Further testing, whether undertaken proactively, as a result of regulatory requirements, or at the direction of state or local health authorities, may result in significant additional expense, additional temporary restrictions on move-ins at affected communities, continued need for isolating positive residents, increased use of PPE by our associates, and increased employee-related costs.

In December 2020, two COVID-19 vaccines received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We elected to hold officework with CVS Health Corporation, with whom we have a longstanding relationship to provide flu shot clinics in our communities, to administer vaccinations on site to our eligible residents and associates through the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program offered through the CDC. Our work to prepare for and host vaccine clinics includes extensive planning, gathering insurance information, obtaining consents, scheduling appointments, holding educational sessions with residents, families, and associates and detailed coordination of traffic flow and observation areas. We hosted our first clinics on December 18, 2020 and by January 22, 2021 had hosted over 500 community vaccine clinics. As of February 22, 2021, first dose vaccine clinics had been completed for residents and associates at 100% of our communities and approximately 85% of our communities have had second dose vaccine clinics.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, have significantly disrupted demand for senior living communities and the sales process, which typically includes in-person prospective resident visits within communities. We believe potential residents and their families are more cautious regarding moving into senior living communities while the pandemic continues, and such caution may persist for some time. In response to these developments, we have redesigned our sales process to include virtual tours, video engagement, and outdoor prospective resident meetings, enhanced and adapted our marketing programs to address the social distancing environment, and sought to strengthen our relationships with referral sources. During the third quarter of 2020, we returned to using in-person prospective resident visits for a majority of our communities. However, several large markets continue with virtual-only prospective resident visits as of December 31, 2020. We have placed restrictions on move-ins at our communities when circumstances warrant, including at the direction of state or local health authorities. Although these restrictions began to ease considerably in August 2020, restrictions on move-ins
50


escalated throughout the fourth quarter of 2020 due to the resurgence of the virus. At the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020, 86%, 98%, and 89% of our communities, respectively, were accepting new move-ins. As of February 22, 2021, 97% of our communities were accepting new move-ins. We cannot predict with reasonable certainty whether or when demand for senior living communities will return to pre-COVID-19 levels or the extent to which the pandemic’s effect on demand may adversely affect the amount of resident fees we are able to collect from our residents.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, began to adversely impact our occupancy and resident fee revenue significantly during March 2020, as new resident leads, visits (including virtual visits), and move-in activity declined significantly compared to typical levels. The year-over-year decrease in monthly move-ins of our same community portfolio has moderated from 64.2% in April 2020 to 26.5% in December 2020. Our consolidated senior housing portfolio's weighted average occupancy has declined in each month of the pandemic, from 82.7% in March 2020 to 71.5% in December 2020, and was 70.0% in January 2021. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $281.1 million of lost resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, including $228.5 million of lost resident fee revenue in our consolidated senior housing portfolio. Further deterioration of our resident fee revenue will result from lower move-in activity and the resident attrition inherent in our business, which may increase due to the impacts of COVID-19. Our home health average daily census also began to decrease in March 2020 due to lower occupancy in our communities and fewer elective medical procedures and hospital discharges, resulting in a 14.6% year-over-year decline in home health average daily census for the year ended December 31, 2020. We expect home health average daily census to continue to gradually recover sequentially with increased elective medical procedures and hospital discharges and senior housing occupancy. We estimate that the pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $52.6 million of lost resident fee revenue for the Health Care Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Facility operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $125.5 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the pandemic, including costs for: acquisition of additional PPE, medical equipment, and cleaning and disposable food service supplies; enhanced cleaning and environmental sanitation; increased employee-related costs, including labor, workers compensation, and health plan expense; increased expense for general liability claims; and COVID-19 testing of residents and associates where not otherwise covered by government payor or third-party insurance sources. We are not able to reasonably predict the total amount of costs we will incur related to the pandemic, and such costs may continue to be substantial. We also recorded non-cash impairment charges in our operating results of $105.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 for our operating lease right-of-use assets and property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected operating performance at communities with impaired assets.

We have taken, and continue to take, actions to enhance and preserve our liquidity in response to the pandemic. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we completed our financing plans in the regular course of business, including refinancing substantially all of our 2020 and 2021 maturities. In addition, on August 31, 2020, we terminated our $250 million revolving credit facility and obtained $266.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing on 16 communities, most of which had secured the credit facility prior to its termination. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants under the Provider Relief Fund and $87.5 million of accelerated/advanced Medicare payments, and we deferred $72.7 million of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes. These programs were created or expanded under the CARES Act, as described below. We also delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects, resulting in an approximate $67 million reduction to our pre-pandemic full-year 2020 capital expenditure plans, and suspended repurchases under our existing share repurchase program. On July 26, 2020, we restructured our 120 community triple-net master lease with Ventas in a multipart transaction. The components included, among other things, reducing our initial annual minimum rent to $100 million, representing a reduction of approximately $86 million over the twelve months ending June 30, 2021, and removal of the prior requirements that we satisfy financial covenants and maintain a security deposit with Ventas. We paid a $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, our total liquidity was $575.5 million, consisting of $380.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, $172.9 million of marketable securities, and $22.2 million of availability on our secured credit facility. We continue to seek opportunities to enhance and preserve our liquidity, including through maintaining expense discipline, continuing to evaluate our financing structure and the state of debt markets, seeking further government-sponsored financial relief related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and completing the pending sale of 80% of the equity in our Health Care Services segment. There is no assurance that debt financing will continue to be available on terms consistent with our expectations or at all, that our efforts will be successful in seeking further government-sponsored financial relief or regarding the amount of, or conditions required to qualify for, any such relief, or that the closing of the pending transaction will be completed in accordance with our expectations, or at all, or generate cash proceeds to us in the amount we anticipate.

51


The CARES Act, signed into law on March 27, 2020, and Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, signed into law on April 24, 2020, provide liquidity and financial relief to certain businesses, among other things. The impacts to us of certain provisions of the CARES Act are summarized below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants from the Provider Relief Fund under which grants have been made available to eligible healthcare providers for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. The accepted grants were made available pursuant to the following distributions from the Provider Relief Fund:

$101.7 million pursuant to General Distributions, with the aggregate amount ultimately determined based on a percentage of our year-over-year changes in patient care revenue and certain operating and other expenses for the first and second quarters of 2020.

$4.6 million pursuant to the Skilled Nursing Facility Targeted Distribution, which generally related to our certified skilled nursing facilities.

$3.5 million pursuant to the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution, including incentive payments, which related to our skilled nursing care provided through our CCRCs.

Grants received from the Provider Relief Fund are subject to the terms and conditions of the program, including that such funds may only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and will reimburse only for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to COVID-19 and have not been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are not obligated to reimburse. The permissible uses of grants from the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution are further limited to certain infection control expenses. The program requires us to report to HHS on our use of the grants, and our reporting is subject to audit. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $109.8 million of the grants as other operating income based upon our estimates of our satisfaction of the conditions of the grants during such period.

HHS continues to evaluate future allocations of, and regulation and guidance regarding, grants made under the Provider Relief Fund. We intend to pursue additional funding that may become available. However, there can be no assurance that we will qualify for, or receive, grants in the amount we expect, that additional restrictions on the permissible uses or terms and conditions of the grants will not be imposed by HHS, or that future funding programs will be made available for which we qualify.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received $87.5 million under the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program administered by CMS, which was temporarily expanded by the CARES Act. Approximately $75.2 million related to our Health Care Services segment and the remainder related to our CCRCs segment. Under the program, we requested acceleration/advancement of 100% of our Medicare payment amount for a three-month period. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act, enacted on October 1, 2020, amended the repayment terms for accelerated/advanced payments. As amended, recoupment of accelerated/advanced payments will begin one year after payments were issued. Payments will be recouped at a rate of 25% of Medicare payments for the first eleven months following the anniversary of issuance and at a rate of 50% of Medicare payments for the next six months. Any outstanding balance of accelerated/advanced payments will be due following such recoupment period. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement we expect to repay the then outstanding balance of such accelerated/advance payments related to our Health Care Services segment at the closing of the sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment.

Under the CARES Act, we have elected to defer payment of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes incurred from March 27, 2020 through December 31, 2020. One-half of such deferral amount will become due on each of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2020, we have deferred payment of $72.7 million under the program.

The CARES Act temporarily suspended the 2% Medicare sequestration for the period May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, which primarily benefited our Health Care Services segment. This suspension had a favorable impact of $4.0 million on the segment’s resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, extended the sequestration suspension through March 31, 2021.

We are eligible to claim the employee retention tax credit for certain of our associates under the CARES Act. The refundable tax credit for 2020 is available to employers that fully or partially suspend operations during any calendar quarter in 2020 due to orders from an appropriate governmental authority limiting commerce, travel, or group meetings due to COVID-19, and is equal to 50% of qualified wages paid after March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2020 to qualified employees, with a maximum credit of $5,000 per employee. We estimate that we will be eligible to claim tax credits of
52


approximately $10 million for 2020. The credit was modified and extended for wages paid from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and we are assessing our eligibility to claim such credit. There can be no assurance that we will qualify for, or receive, tax credits in the amount we expect.

In addition to the grants described above, we have received and recognized $5.9 million of other operating income from grants from other government sources.

We cannot predict with reasonable certainty the impacts that COVID-19 ultimately will have on our business, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity, and our response efforts may continue to delay or negatively impact our strategic initiatives, including plans for future growth. The ultimate impacts of COVID-19 will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including the duration, severity, and breadth of the pandemic and any resurgence of the disease; the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s economy and debt and equity markets and the local economies in our markets; the development, availability, utilization, and efficacy of COVID-19 testing, therapeutic agents, and vaccines and the prioritization of such resources among businesses and demographic groups; government financial and regulatory relief efforts that may become available to business and individuals, including our ability to qualify for and satisfy the terms and conditions of financial relief; perceptions regarding the safety of senior living communities during and after the pandemic; changes in demand for senior living communities and our ability to adapt our sales and marketing efforts to meet that demand; the impact of COVID-19 on our residents’ and their families’ ability to afford our resident fees, including due to changes in unemployment rates, consumer confidence, housing markets, and equity markets caused by COVID-19; changes in the acuity levels of our new residents; the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on seniors generally and those residing in our communities; the duration and costs of our response efforts, including increased equipment, supplies, labor, litigation, testing, vaccination clinic, and other expenses; the impact of COVID-19 on our ability to complete financings, refinancings, or other transactions (including dispositions) or to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments and to satisfy financial and other covenants in our debt and lease documents; increased regulatory requirements, including unfunded, mandatory testing; increased enforcement actions resulting from COVID-19; government action that may limit our collection or discharge efforts for delinquent accounts; and the frequency and magnitude of legal actions and liability claims that may arise due to COVID-19 or our response efforts.

2021 Pending Sale of Health Care Services

On February 24, 2021, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with affiliates of HCA Healthcare providing for the sale of 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment for a purchase price of $400 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement, including a reduction for the remaining outstanding balance as of the closing of Medicare advance payments and deferred payroll tax payments related to the Health Care Services segment, which were $75.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. We expect our net cash proceeds at the closing will be approximately $300 million, subject to the timing of closing with respect to the adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement also contains certain agreed upon indemnities for the benefit of the purchaser. The closing of the sale transaction is anticipated to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021, subject to receipt of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, at closing of the transaction, we will retain a 20% equity interest in the business. Upon closing, we expect that the results and financial position of our Health Care Services segment will be deconsolidated from our financial statements and that our interest in the joint venture will be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We anticipate that the sale transaction will utilize a portion of our federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset the expected taxable gain on such transaction.

Transaction Activity and Impact of Dispositions on Results of Operations

Overview

During 2020, we continued execution on our portfolio optimization initiative through which we have disposed of owned and leased communities and restructured leases. Such activities during 2020 included restructuring our lease arrangements with Ventas announced on July 27, 2020 and closing the multi-part transaction with Healthpeak announced on October 1, 2019. As a result of these initiatives and other lease restructuring, expiration, and termination activity, and other transactions, during the year ended December 31, 2020 we:

Terminated our triple-net lease obligations on an aggregate of 32 communities, including through the acquisition of 27 formerly leased communities;
Disposed of an aggregate of seven owned communities;
Sold substantially all of our remaining ownership interests in unconsolidated ventures, including our entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak; and
Reduced our management of communities on behalf of former unconsolidated ventures and third parties, representing a net reduction of 25 managed communities during the year.
53



As of December 31, 2020, we owned 350 communities, representing a majority of our consolidated community portfolio, and leased 301 communities. We also managed 75 communities on behalf of third parties or ventures for which we have an equity interest. The charts below show the foregoing changes in our portfolio from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020.

bkd-20201231_g1.jpg


During the year ending December 31, 2021, we expect to close on the dispositions of three owned communities (249 units) classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020 and terminations of a substantial portion of our management arrangements. The closings of the various pending and expected transactions are, or will be, subject to the satisfaction of various closing conditions, including (where applicable) the receipt of regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the transactions will close or, if they do, when the actual closings will occur.

Summaries of the foregoing transactions, and their impact on our results of operations, are below. See also Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for more information about the transactions.

Completed Dispositions of Owned Communities

In addition to the conveyance of five communities to Ventas, during the year ended December 31, 2020, described below, we completed the sale of two owned communities (375 units) for cash proceeds of $38.1 million, net of transaction costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the sale of 14 owned communities (1,768 units) for cash proceeds of $85.4 million, net of transaction costs. We utilized a portion of the cash proceeds from the asset sales to repay approximately $5.1 million of associated mortgage debt and debt prepayment penalties.

2020 Ventas Lease Restructuring

On July 26, 2020 (the "Effective Date"), we entered into definitive agreements with Ventas in connection with the restructuring of our lease arrangements with Ventas, including a Master Transaction Letter Agreement (the "Master Agreement"). Pursuant to the Master Agreement:

On the Effective Date the parties entered into the Amended and Restated Master Lease and Security Agreement (the "Master Lease") and Amended and Restated Guaranty (the "Guaranty"), which amended and restated the prior Master Lease and Security Agreement and prior Guaranty, each dated as of April 26, 2018 and as amended from time to time. Pursuant to the Master Lease, we continue to lease 120 communities (10,174 units) for an aggregate initial annual minimum rent of approximately $100 million, which reflects a reduction of approximately $83 million of annual minimum rent in effect prior to the transaction. Effective on January 1 of each lease year, beginning January 1, 2022, the annual minimum rent will be subject to a 3% escalator. The initial term of the Master Lease ends December 31, 2025, with two 10-year extension options available to us. The annual minimum rent for the initial lease year of any such renewal term will be the greater of the fair market rental of the communities or the increased annual minimum rent for such lease year applying the foregoing 3% escalator. The Master Lease removed the prior provision that would have automatically extended the initial term in the event of the consummation of a change of control transaction by us. The Master Lease
54


requires us to spend (or escrow with Ventas) a minimum of $1,500 per unit on a community-level basis and $3,600 per unit on an aggregate basis of all communities, in each case per 24-month period ending December 31 during the lease term, commencing with the 24-month period ending December 31, 2021. In addition, Ventas agreed to fund costs associated with certain pre-approved capital expenditure projects in the aggregate amount of up to $37.8 million. Upon disbursement of such expenditures, the annual minimum rent under the Master Lease will increase by the amount of the disbursement multiplied by 50% of the sum of the then current 10-year treasury note rate and 4.5%. The transaction agreements with Ventas further provide that the Master Lease and certain other agreements between the parties will be cross-defaulted.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the Master Lease are guaranteed at the parent level pursuant to the Guaranty. The Guaranty removed the prior requirements that we satisfy, at the parent level, financial covenants and that we maintain a security deposit with Ventas. The Guaranty also removed the prior right of Ventas to terminate the Master Lease on the basis of parent level financial covenants. Pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty, we may consummate a change of control transaction without the need for consent of Ventas so long as certain objective conditions are satisfied, including the post-transaction guarantor’s maintaining a minimum tangible net worth of at least $600.0 million, having minimum levels of operational experience and reputation in the senior living industry, and paying a change of control fee of $25.0 million to Ventas. The Guaranty removed the prior provisions that would have required that such post-transaction guarantor satisfy a maximum leverage ratio level, that we fund additional capital expenditures, and that we extend the term upon the occurrence of the change in control transaction. Under the terms of the Guaranty, commencing January 1, 2024 (and until such time (if any) as we exercise our lease term extension option with respect to the Master Lease), Ventas shall have the right to terminate the Master Lease (with respect to one or more communities), provided that the trailing twelve month coverage ratio of each such community is less than 0.9x and provided further that the removal and termination of any such communities does not result in a portfolio coverage ratio with respect to the remaining communities in the Master Lease that is less than the portfolio coverage ratio prior to such removal and termination.

On the Effective Date, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Omnibus Agreement with Ventas, which provides that if a default occurs and is continuing under certain other material leases or under certain material financings and if the same continues beyond the permitted cure period or the applicable landlord or lender exercises any material remedies, Ventas shall have the right to transition all or a portion of the communities from the Master Lease to a management arrangement with us pursuant to a market management agreement (which is terminable by either party). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Ventas may only transition one or more communities from the Master Lease to a management arrangement if such transition does not result in a portfolio coverage ratio with respect to the remaining communities in the Master Lease that is less than the portfolio coverage ratio prior to such transition.

On the Effective Date, we conveyed five owned communities (471 units) to Ventas in full release and satisfaction of $78.4 million principal amount of indebtedness secured by the communities. Upon closing, the parties entered into new terminable, market rate management agreements pursuant to which we manage the communities. We also paid to Ventas $115.0 million in cash, released all security deposits to Ventas under the former guaranty (which included the release of a $42.4 million deposit held by Ventas and the payment of $4.2 million in cash as settlement of the amount of letters of credit), and issued a $45.0 million unsecured interest-only promissory note to Ventas. The initial interest rate of the promissory note is 9.0% per annum and will increase by 0.50% on each anniversary of the date of issuance. We may prepay the outstanding principal amount in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The promissory note matures on the earlier of December 31, 2025 or the occurrence of a change of control transaction (as defined in the Guaranty).

On the Effective Date, we issued to Ventas a warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase 16.3 million shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price per share of $3.00. The Warrant is exercisable at Ventas’ option at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, until December 31, 2025. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable on exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, including for cash dividends, stock dividends, stock splits, reclassifications, non-cash distributions, certain repurchases of common stock and business combination transactions. To the extent that the number of shares owned by Ventas (including shares underlying the Warrant) would be more than 9.6% of the total combined voting power of all our classes of capital stock or of the total value of shares of all our classes of capital stock (the "Ownership Cap") (other than as a result of actions taken by Ventas), we would generally be required to repurchase the number of shares necessary to avoid Ventas exceeding the Ownership Cap unless Ventas makes an election to require us to pay Ventas cash in lieu of issuing shares pursuant to the Warrant in excess of the Ownership Cap. The Warrant and the shares issuable upon exercise thereof have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and were issued in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof. On the Effective Date, the parties entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which Ventas and its permitted transferees are entitled to certain registration rights. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant, which was declared effective on August 17, 2020. Ventas is entitled
55


to customary underwritten offering, piggyback, and additional demand registration rights with respect to the shares underlying the Warrant.

2019 Healthpeak CCRC Venture and Master Lease Transactions

On October 1, 2019, we entered into definitive agreements, including a Master Transactions and Cooperation Agreement (the "MTCA") and an Equity Interest Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), providing for a multi-part transaction with Healthpeak. The parties subsequently amended the agreements to include one additional entry fee CCRC community as part of the sale of our interest in our unconsolidated entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak (the "CCRC Venture") (rather than removing the community from the CCRC Venture for joint marketing and sale). The components of the multi-part transaction included:

CCRC Venture Transaction. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on January 31, 2020, Healthpeak acquired our 51% ownership interest in the CCRC Venture, which held 14 entry fee CCRCs (6,383 units) for a total purchase price of $289.2 million, net of a $5.9 million post-closing net working capital adjustment paid to Healthpeak during the three months ended June 30, 2020 (representing an aggregate valuation of $1.06 billion less portfolio debt, subject to a net working capital adjustment). We recognized a $369.8 million gain on sale of assets for year ended December 31, 2020, and we derecognized the net equity method liability for the sale of the ownership interest in the CCRC Venture. At the closing, the parties terminated the existing management agreements on the 14 entry fee CCRCs, Healthpeak paid us a $100.0 million management agreement termination fee, and we transitioned operations of the entry fee CCRCs to a new operator. We recognized $100.0 million of management fee revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2020 for the management termination fee. The sale of our interest in the CCRC Venture and the $100.0 million of management termination fees generated approximately $579.0 million of taxable income in three months ended March 31, 2020. We will utilize any 2020 operating losses generated and tax loss carryforwards (including our capital loss carryforward that was generated in 2018) to offset the taxable gain on this transaction. Prior to the January 31, 2020 closing, the parties moved the remaining two entry fee CCRCs (889 units) into a new unconsolidated venture on substantially the same terms as the CCRC Venture to accommodate the sale of such two communities. Subsequent to these transactions, we will have exited substantially all of our entry fee CCRC operations.

Master Lease Transactions. Pursuant to the MTCA, on January 31, 2020, the parties amended and restated our existing master lease pursuant to which we continued to lease 25 communities (2,711 units) from Healthpeak, and we acquired 18 formerly leased communities (2,014 units) from Healthpeak, at which time the 18 communities were removed from the master lease. At the closing, we paid $405.5 million to acquire such communities and to reduce our annual rent under the amended and restated master lease. We funded the community acquisitions with $192.6 million of non-recourse mortgage financing and the proceeds from the multi-part transaction. In addition, Healthpeak agreed to terminate the lease for one leased community (159 units), which occurred during December 2020. With respect to the continuing 24 communities (2,552 units), our amended and restated master lease: (i) has an initial term to expire on December 31, 2027, subject to two extension options at our election for ten years each, which must be exercised with respect to the entire pool of leased communities; (ii) the initial annual base rent for the 24 communities is $41.7 million and is subject to an escalator of 2.4% per annum on April 1st of each year; and (iii) Healthpeak agreed to make available up to $35.0 million for capital expenditures for a five-year period related to the 24 communities at an initial lease rate of 7.0%. As a result of the community acquisition transaction, we recognized a $19.7 million gain on debt extinguishment during the year ended December 31, 2020 and derecognized the $105.1 million carrying amount of financing lease obligations for eight communities which were previously subject to sale-leaseback transactions in which we were deemed to have continuing involvement. During March 2020, we obtained $30.0 million of additional non-recourse mortgage financing on the acquired communities.

2018 Welltower Lease and RIDEA Venture Restructuring

Pursuant to transactions we entered into with Welltower on June 27, 2018, our triple-net lease obligations on 37 communities (4,095 units) were terminated effective June 30, 2018. We paid Welltower an aggregate lease termination fee of $58.0 million. In addition, effective June 30, 2018, we sold our 20% equity interest in our Welltower RIDEA venture to Welltower for net proceeds of $33.5 million. We also elected not to renew two master leases with Welltower which matured on September 30, 2018 (11 communities; 1,128 units). As of December 31, 2020, we continue to operate 74 communities (3,674 units) under triple-net leases with Welltower, and our remaining lease agreements with Welltower contain an objective change of control standard that allows us to engage in certain change of control and other transactions without the need to obtain Welltower's consent, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

56


2018 Ventas Lease Portfolio Restructuring

On April 26, 2018, we entered into several agreements to restructure a portfolio of 128 communities (10,567 units) we leased from Ventas as of such date, including a Master Lease and Security Agreement (the "Former Ventas Master Lease"), which was subsequently amended and restated on July 26, 2020 as described above. The Former Ventas Master Lease amended and restated prior leases comprising an aggregate portfolio of 107 communities (8,459 units) into the Former Ventas Master Lease and Ventas agreed to observe, perform, and enforce separate leases for 21 additional communities (2,107 units) as if they had been combined into the Former Ventas Master Lease effective April 26, 2018, to the extent not in conflict with any mortgage debt underlying such communities. The transaction agreements with Ventas further provided that the Former Ventas Master Lease and certain other agreements between us and Ventas were subject to cross-default provisions.

The Former Ventas Master Lease had an initial term ending December 31, 2025 and provided us with two 10-year extension options. The transaction agreements provided that if we had consummated a change of control transaction on or before December 31, 2025, the initial term of the Former Ventas Master Lease would be extended automatically through December 31, 2029. The Former Ventas Master Lease and separate lease agreements with Ventas, which were guaranteed at the parent level by us, provided for total rent in 2018 of $175.0 million for the 128 communities, including the pro-rata portion of an $8.0 million annual rent credit for 2018. We received an annual rent credit of $8.0 million in 2019 and an annual rent credit of $7.0 million in 2020, prior to giving effect to the reduction from the agreements on July 26, 2020 as described above. The annual minimum rent was subject to an escalator equal to the lesser of 2.25% or four times the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") increase for the prior year (or zero if there was a CPI decrease).

The Former Ventas Master Lease required us to spend (or escrow with Ventas) a minimum of $2,000 per unit per 24-month period commencing with the 24-month period ended December 31, 2019 and thereafter each 24-month period ending December 31 during the lease term, subject to annual increases commensurate with the escalator beginning with the second lease year of the first extension term (if any), and provided that if we had consummated a change of control transaction, we would have been required within 36 months to invest (or escrow with Ventas) an aggregate of $30.0 million in the communities for revenue-enhancing capital projects.

Under the definitive agreements with Ventas, we, at the parent level, were required to satisfy certain financial covenants (including tangible net worth and leverage ratios) and may have consummated a change of control transaction without the need for consent of Ventas so long as certain objective conditions were satisfied, including the post-transaction guarantor's satisfying certain enhanced minimum tangible net worth and maximum leverage ratio, having minimum levels of operational experience and reputation in the senior living industry, and paying a change of control fee of $25.0 million to Ventas.

Pursuant to the Former Ventas Master Lease, we exercised our right to direct Ventas to use its commercially reasonable, diligent efforts to market for sale certain communities. During 2019, seven communities (358 units) were sold by Ventas and removed from the Former Ventas Master Lease, and the annual minimum rent was prospectively reduced by $1.7 million. During 2020, one community (32 units) was sold by Ventas and removed from the Former Ventas Master Lease, and the annual minimum rent was prospectively reduced by $0.1 million.

We recognized a $125.7 million non-cash loss on lease modification during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily for the extensions of the triple-net lease obligations for communities with lease terms that are unfavorable to us given market conditions on the amendment date in exchange for modifications to the change of control provisions and financial covenant provisions of the community leases.

Additional Acquisitions Pursuant to Purchase Option

On January 22, 2020, we acquired eight formerly leased communities (336 units) from National Health Investors, Inc. pursuant to our exercise of a purchase option for a purchase price of $39.3 million. We funded the community acquisitions with cash on hand. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we obtained $29.2 million of non-recourse mortgage financing, primarily secured by the acquired communities. On August 31, 2020, we acquired one formerly leased community (103 units) pursuant to our exercise of a purchase option for a purchase price of $25.0 million and funded the acquisition with cash on hand and non-recourse mortgage financing secured by the acquired community.

57


Summary of Financial Impact of Completed Dispositions

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amounts included within our consolidated financial data for the 36 communities that we disposed through sales, conveyances, and lease terminations during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, through the respective disposition dates.
Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Actual ResultsAmounts Attributable to Completed DispositionsActual Results Less Amounts Attributable to Completed Dispositions
Resident fees
Independent Living$512,598 $— $512,598 
Assisted Living and Memory Care1,691,276 14,080 1,677,196 
CCRCs321,883 20,495 301,388 
Senior housing resident fees$2,525,757 $34,575 $2,491,182 
Facility operating expense
Independent Living$341,608 $— $341,608 
Assisted Living and Memory Care1,325,260 13,008 1,312,252 
CCRCs287,157 19,997 267,160 
Senior housing facility operating expense$1,954,025 $33,005 $1,921,020 
Cash lease payments$427,711 $4,696 $423,015 


Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Actual ResultsAmounts Attributable to Completed DispositionsActual Results Less Amounts Attributable to Completed Dispositions
Resident fees
Independent Living$544,558 $— $544,558 
Assisted Living and Memory Care1,815,938 50,775 1,765,163 
CCRCs402,175 64,791 337,384 
Senior housing resident fees$2,762,671 $115,566 $2,647,105 
Facility operating expense
Independent Living$340,817 $— $340,817 
Assisted Living and Memory Care1,297,302 43,880 1,253,422 
CCRCs330,103 58,813 271,290 
Senior housing facility operating expense$1,968,222 $102,693 $1,865,529 
Cash lease payments$377,714 $9,011 $368,703 

58


The following table sets forth the number of communities and units in our senior housing segments disposed through sales, conveyances, and lease terminations during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
Years Ended December 31,
20202019
Number of communities
Assisted Living and Memory Care10 20 
CCRCs
Total12 24 
Total units
Assisted Living and Memory Care827 1,600 
CCRCs456 827 
Total1,283 2,427 

Other Recent Developments

Increased Competitive Pressures

Data from NIC shows that industry occupancy began to decrease starting in 2016 as a result of new openings and oversupply. During and since 2016, we have experienced an elevated rate of competitive new openings, with significant new competition opening in many markets, which has adversely affected our occupancy, revenues, results of operations, and cash flow. In 2020, competitive new openings remained elevated, but declined from 2019. Beginning in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in additional occupancy pressure for our industry. NIC data shows that senior housing occupancy decreased for three consecutive quarters between March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2020, with nearly all markets falling to record low occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2020.

Capital Expenditures

Our total community-level capital expenditures were $140.1 million for 2020, which was a decrease of $98.6 million from 2019, and $27.8 million of which was reimbursed by our lessors. The decrease in community-level capital expenditures was partially due to our approximate $48 million reduction to our pre-pandemic full-year 2020 community-level capital expenditure plans as we delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects in response to the pandemic. In the aggregate, we expect our full-year 2021 non-development capital expenditures, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, to be approximately $140 million. In addition, we expect our full-year 2021 development capital expenditures to be approximately $10 million, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, and such projects include those for expansion, repositioning, redeveloping, and major renovation of selected existing senior living communities. We anticipate that our 2021 capital expenditures will be funded from cash on hand, cash equivalents, marketable securities, cash flows from operations, and reimbursements from lessors.


Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2020, our total operations included 726 communities with a capacity to serve approximately 64,000 residents. As of that date we owned 350 communities (31,853 units), leased 301 communities (21,129 units), and managed 75 communities (10,129 units). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, which are included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for any particular period are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. Transactions completed during the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 affect the comparability of our results of operations, and summaries of such transactions and their impact on our results of operations are discussed above in "Transaction Activity and Impact of Dispositions on Results of Operations."

We use the operating measures described below in connection with operating and managing our business and reporting our results of operations. Our adoption and application of the new lease accounting standard impacted our results for the year ended December 31, 2019 due to our recognition of additional resident fee revenue and facility operating expense, which are non-cash
59


and are non-recurring in years subsequent to December 31, 2019. To aid in comparability between periods, presentations of our results on a same community basis, and RevPAR and RevPOR, exclude the impact of the lease accounting standard.

Senior housing operating results and data presented on a same community basis reflect results and data of a consistent population of communities by excluding the impact of changes in the composition of our portfolio of communities. The operating results exclude hurricane and natural disaster expense and related insurance recoveries, and for the 2019 period, exclude the additional resident fee revenue and facility operating expense recognized as a result of the application of the lease accounting standard ASC 842. We define our same community portfolio as communities consolidated and operational for the full period in both comparison years. Consolidated communities excluded from the same community portfolio include communities acquired or disposed of since the beginning of the prior year, communities classified as assets held for sale, certain communities planned for disposition, certain communities that have undergone or are undergoing expansion, redevelopment, and repositioning projects, and certain communities that have experienced a casualty event that significantly impacts their operations. Our management uses same community operating results and data for decision making, and we believe such results and data provide useful information to investors, because it enables comparisons of revenue, expense, and other operating measures for a consistent portfolio over time without giving effect to the impacts of communities that were not consolidated and operational for the comparison periods, communities acquired or disposed during the comparison periods (or planned for disposition), and communities with results that are or likely will be impacted by completed or in-process development-related capital expenditure projects. As presented herein, same community results include the direct costs incurred to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

RevPAR, or average monthly senior housing resident fee revenue per available unit, is defined as resident fee revenue for the corresponding portfolio for the period (excluding Health Care Services segment revenue and entrance fee amortization, and, for the 2019 period, the additional resident fee revenue recognized as a result of the application of the lease accounting standard ASC 842), divided by the weighted average number of available units in the corresponding portfolio for the period, divided by the number of months in the period. We measure RevPAR at the consolidated level, as well as at the segment level with respect to our Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, and CCRCs segments. Our management uses RevPAR for decision making, and we believe the measure provides useful information to investors, because the measure is an indicator of senior housing resident fee revenue performance that reflects the impact of both senior housing occupancy and rate.

RevPOR, or average monthly senior housing resident fee revenue per occupied unit, is defined as resident fee revenue for the corresponding portfolio for the period (excluding Health Care Services segment revenue and entrance fee amortization, and, for the 2019 period, the additional resident fee revenue recognized as a result of the application of the lease accounting standard ASC 842), divided by the weighted average number of occupied units in the corresponding portfolio for the period, divided by the number of months in the period. We measure RevPOR at the consolidated level, as well as at the segment level with respect to our Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, and CCRCs segments. Our management uses RevPOR for decision making, and we believe the measure provides useful information to investors, because it reflects the average amount of senior housing resident fee revenue we derive from an occupied unit per month without factoring occupancy rates. RevPOR is a significant driver of our senior housing revenue performance.

Weighted average occupancy rate reflects the percentage of units at our owned and leased communities being utilized by residents over a reporting period. We measure occupancy rates with respect to our Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, and CCRCs segments, and also measure this metric both on a consolidated senior housing and a same community basis. Our management uses weighted average occupancy, and we believe the measure provides useful information to investors, because it is a significant driver of our senior housing revenue performance.

This section includes the non-GAAP performance measure Adjusted EBITDA. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for our definition of the measure and other important information regarding such measure, including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.

Discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below. Discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 can be found in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 19, 2020.

60


Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

Summary Operating Results

The following table summarizes our overall operating results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
(in thousands)20202019AmountPercent
Total resident fees and management fees revenue$3,023,257 $3,267,039 (243,782)(7.5)%
Other operating income115,749 — 115,749 NM
Facility operating expense2,341,859 2,390,495 (48,636)(2.0)%
Net income (loss)81,945 (268,492)350,437 NM
Adjusted EBITDA264,387 401,169 (136,782)(34.1)%

The decrease in total resident fees and management fees revenue was primarily attributable to a $317.4 million decrease in resident fees, including a 5.1% decrease in same community RevPAR, comprised of a 680 basis points decrease in same community weighted average occupancy and a 3.2% increase in same community RevPOR. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $281.1 million of lost resident fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, including $228.5 million and $52.6 million of lost resident fee revenue in our consolidated senior housing portfolio and Health Care Services segment, respectively. Estimated lost resident fee revenue represents the difference between the actual revenue for the period and our expectations prior to estimating the effects of COVID-19. Additionally, the disposition of 36 communities through sales and conveyances of owned communities and lease terminations since the beginning of the prior year resulted in $81.0 million less in resident fees during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year. Revenue for the Health Care Services segment decreased $80.5 million, as our home health average daily census began to decrease in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to the implementation of the PDGM, an alternate home health case-mix adjustment methodology with a 30 day unit of payment, which became effective beginning January 1, 2020. Management fee revenue increased $73.6 million primarily due to $100.0 million of management fee revenue during the year for the management termination fee payment from Healthpeak, partially offset by terminations of management agreements subsequent to the beginning of the prior year.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $115.7 million of government grants as other operating income based on our estimates of our satisfaction of the conditions of the grants during the period.

The decrease in facility operating expense was primarily attributable to the disposition of communities since the beginning of the prior year, which resulted in $69.7 million less in facility operating expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year. Additionally, there was a decrease in labor costs for home health services as a result of the lower census and as we adjusted our home health services operational structure, to better align our facility operating expenses and business model in connection with PDGM. The decrease was partially offset by a 6.0% increase in same community facility operating expense, which was primarily due to $107.5 million of incremental costs incurred in our same community portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in same community facility operating expense was partially offset by repairs and maintenance cost decreases due to fewer move-ins during the current year and a decrease in supplies costs due to the reduced occupancy during the current year.

In addition to the foregoing factors, we recognized additional resident fee revenue and additional facility operating expense of $26.4 million and $49.5 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the application of the new lease accounting standard effective January 1, 2019. Same community resident fee revenue and facility operating expense excludes approximately $24.1 million and $45.2 million, respectively, of such additional revenue and expenses.

The increase in net income was primarily attributable to a $367.3 million increase in net gain on sale of assets, resulting from the sale of our interest in the CCRC Venture, partially offset by the net impact of the revenue, other operating income, and facility operating expense factors previously discussed.

The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily attributable to the net impact of the revenue (including the $100.0 million management agreement termination fee payment received from Healthpeak), other operating income, and facility operating expense factors previously discussed and the $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020, partially offset by a decrease in general and administrative expense.
61



Operating Results - Senior Housing Segments

The following table summarizes the operating results and data of our three senior housing segments (Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, and CCRCs) on a combined basis for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 including operating results and data on a same community basis. See “Item 12. Security Ownershipmanagement's discussion and analysis of the operating results on an individual segment basis on the following pages.
(in thousands, except communities, units, occupancy, RevPAR, and RevPOR)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Resident fees$2,525,757 $2,762,671 $(236,914)(8.6)%
Other operating income$92,862 $— $92,862 NM
Facility operating expense$1,954,025 $1,968,222 $(14,197)(0.7)%
Number of communities (period end)651 663 (12)(1.8)%
Number of units (period end)52,982 54,181 (1,199)(2.2)%
Total average units53,687 55,501 (1,814)(3.3)%
RevPAR$3,917 $4,106 $(189)(4.6)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)77.5 %83.9 %(640) bpsn/a
RevPOR$5,054 $4,893 $161 3.3 %
Same Community Operating Results and Data
Resident fees$2,326,529 $2,451,352 $(124,823)(5.1)%
Other operating income$84,265 $— $84,265 NM
Facility operating expense$1,781,750 $1,680,424 $101,326 6.0 %
Number of communities629 629 — — 
Total average units49,237 49,232 — 
RevPAR$3,938 $4,149 $(211)(5.1)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)77.8 %84.6 %(680) bpsn/a
RevPOR$5,063 $4,904 $159 3.2 %

62


Independent Living Segment

The following table summarizes the operating results and data for our Independent Living segment for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, including operating results and data on a same community basis.
(in thousands, except communities, units, occupancy, RevPAR, and RevPOR)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Resident fees$512,598 $544,558 $(31,960)(5.9)%
Other operating income$11,823 $— $11,823 NM
Facility operating expense$341,608 $340,817 $791 0.2 %
Number of communities (period end)68 68 — — 
Number of units (period end)12,534 12,514 20 0.2 %
Total average units12,533 12,474 59 0.5 %
RevPAR$3,408 $3,580 $(172)(4.8)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)81.8 %89.2 %(740) bpsn/a
RevPOR$4,165 $4,014 $151 3.8 %
Same Community Operating Results and Data
Resident fees$482,200 $505,729 $(23,529)(4.7)%
Other operating income$10,775 $— $10,775 NM
Facility operating expense$318,471 $307,790 $10,681 3.5 %
Number of communities64 64 — — 
Total average units11,704 11,695 0.1 %
RevPAR$3,433 $3,604 $(171)(4.7)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)82.1 %89.2 %(710) bpsn/a
RevPOR$4,185 $4,042 $143 3.5 %

The decrease in the segment's resident fees was primarily attributable to a decrease in the segment's same community RevPAR, comprised of a 710 basis points decrease in same community weighted average occupancy and a 3.5% increase in same community RevPOR. The decrease in the segment's same community weighted average occupancy primarily reflects the impact of reduced move-in activity related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $35.9 million of lost resident fee revenue on a same community basis for this segment for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the segment's same community RevPOR was primarily the result of in-place rent increases.

The increase in the segment's facility operating expense was primarily attributable to an increase in the segment's same community facility operating expense, including $14.7 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. These increases in the segment's same community facility operating expense were partially offset by decreases in repairs and maintenance costs due to fewer move-ins during the current year and supplies costs due to the reduced occupancy during the current year.

We recognized additional resident fee revenue and additional facility operating expense for this segment of $8.7 million and $12.7 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the application of the new lease accounting standard effective January 1, 2019. Same community resident fee revenue and facility operating expense for this segment excludes approximately $8.2 million and $12.0 million, respectively, of such additional revenue and expenses.


63


Assisted Living and Memory Care Segment

The following table summarizes the operating results and data for our Assisted Living and Memory Care segment for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, including operating results and data on a same community basis.
(in thousands, except communities, units, occupancy, RevPAR, and RevPOR)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Resident fees$1,691,276 $1,815,938 $(124,662)(6.9)%
Other operating income$62,585 $— $62,585 NM
Facility operating expense$1,325,260 $1,297,302 $27,958 2.2 %
Number of communities (period end)563 573 (10)(1.7)%
Number of units (period end)35,126 35,956 (830)(2.3)%
Total average units35,530 36,560 (1,030)(2.8)%
RevPAR$3,967 $4,106 $(139)(3.4)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)76.5 %82.6 %(610) bpsn/a
RevPOR$5,184 $4,971 $213 4.3 %
Same Community Operating Results and Data
Resident fees$1,632,470 $1,705,487 $(73,017)(4.3)%
Other operating income$60,939 $— $60,939 NM
Facility operating expense$1,275,032 $1,186,001 $89,031 7.5 %
Number of communities551 551 — — 
Total average units33,921 33,925 (4)— 
RevPAR$4,010 $4,189 $(179)(4.3)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)76.8 %83.3 %(650) bpsn/a
RevPOR$5,222 $5,032 $190 3.8 %

The decrease in the segment's resident fees was primarily attributable to a decrease in the segment's same community RevPAR, comprised of a 650 basis points decrease in same community weighted average occupancy and a 3.8% increase in same community RevPOR. The decrease in the segment's same community weighted average occupancy primarily reflects the impact of reduced move-in activity related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $137.7 million of lost resident fee revenue on a same community basis for this segment for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the segment's same community RevPOR was primarily the result of in-place rent increases. Additionally, the disposition of 30 communities since the beginning of the prior year resulted in $36.7 million less in resident fees during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year.

The increase in the segment's facility operating expense was primarily attributable to an increase in the segment's same community facility operating expense, including $80.4 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and an increase in labor expense arising from increased contract labor costs. The increase in the segment's same community facility operating expense was partially offset by decreases in repairs and maintenance costs due to fewer move-ins during the current year. The increase in the segment's facility operating expense was partially offset by the disposition of communities since the beginning of the prior year, which resulted in $30.9 million less in facility operating expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year.

In addition to the foregoing factors, we recognized additional resident fee revenue and additional facility operating expense for this segment of approximately $14.7 million and $31.6 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the application of the new lease accounting standard effective January 1, 2019. Same community resident fee revenue and facility operating expense for this segment excludes approximately $13.8 million and $29.7 million, respectively, of such additional revenue and expenses.
64


CCRCs Segment

The following table summarizes the operating results and data for our CCRCs segment for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, including operating results and data on a same community basis.
(in thousands, except communities, units, occupancy, RevPAR, and RevPOR)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Resident fees$321,883 $402,175 $(80,292)(20.0)%
Other operating income$18,454 $— $18,454 NM
Facility operating expense$287,157 $330,103 $(42,946)(13.0)%
Number of communities (period end)20 22 (2)(9.1)%
Number of units (period end)5,322 5,711 (389)(6.8)%
Total average units5,624 6,467 (843)(13.0)%
RevPAR$4,738 $5,123 $(385)(7.5)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)74.2 %81.3 %(710) bpsn/a
RevPOR$6,389 $6,298 $91 1.4 %
Same Community Operating Results and Data
Resident fees$211,859 $240,136 $(28,277)(11.8)%
Other operating income$12,551 $— $12,551 NM
Facility operating expense$188,247 $186,633 $1,614 0.9 %
Number of communities14 14 — — 
Total average units3,612 3,612 — — 
RevPAR$4,888 $5,540 $(652)(11.8)%
Occupancy rate (weighted average)73.3 %82.7 %(940) bpsn/a
RevPOR$6,674 $6,704 $(30)(0.4)%

The decrease in the segment's resident fees was primarily attributable to the disposition of six communities since the beginning of the prior year, which resulted in $44.3 million less in resident fees during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year. Additionally, there was a decrease in the segment's same community RevPAR, comprised of a 940 basis points decrease in same community weighted average occupancy and a 0.4% decrease in same community RevPOR. The decrease in the segment's same community weighted average occupancy primarily reflects the impact of reduced move-in activity related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $36.4 million of lost resident fee revenue on a same community basis for this segment for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease in the segment's same community RevPOR was primarily the result of a service mix shift from less skilled nursing services within the segment, partially offset by in-place rent increases.

The decrease in the segment's facility operating expense was primarily attributable to the disposition of communities since the beginning of the prior year, which resulted in $38.8 million less in facility operating expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year. The decrease in facility operating expense was partially offset by an increase in the segment's same community facility operating expense, including $12.4 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by decreases in labor expense arising from fewer hours worked and healthcare supplies costs during the period as we intentionally scaled back such costs for the reduced occupancy.

In addition to the foregoing factors, we recognized additional resident fee revenue and additional facility operating expense for this segment of approximately $3.0 million and $5.3 million respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the application of the new lease accounting standard effective January 1, 2019. Same community resident fee revenue and facility operating expense for this segment excludes approximately $2.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, of such additional revenue and expenses.
65


Operating Results - Health Care Services Segment

The following table summarizes the operating results and data for our Health Care Services segment for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(in thousands, except census)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Resident fees$366,810 $447,260 $(80,450)(18.0)%
Other operating income$22,887 $— $22,887 NM
Facility operating expense$387,834 $422,273 $(34,439)(8.2)%
Home health average daily census13,196 15,447 (2,251)(14.6)%
Hospice average daily census1,658 1,580 78 4.9 %

The decrease in the segment's resident fees was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue for home health services, as our home health average daily census also began to decrease in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in lower occupancy in our communities and fewer elective medical procedures and hospital discharges. Additionally, the implementation of the PDGM resulted in a decrease in revenue for home health services. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic, including the related restrictions at our communities, resulted in $52.6 million of lost resident fee revenue for this segment for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The decrease in the segment's facility operating expense was primarily attributable to a decrease in labor costs for home health services as a result of the lower census and as we adjusted our home health services operational structure, to better align our facility operating expenses and business model in connection with PDGM. The decrease in the segment's facility operating expense was partially offset by $8.2 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and an increase in labor costs for hospice services arising from wage rate increases and the expansion of our hospice services throughout 2019.

As described above, we expect to sell 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with HCA Healthcare, which transaction is expected to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021. Upon closing, we expect that the results and financial position of our Health Care Services segment will be deconsolidated from our financial statements.

Operating Results - Management Services Segment

The following table summarizes the operating results and data for our Management Services segment for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(in thousands, except communities and units)Year Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
Management fees$130,690 $57,108 $73,582 NM
Reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of managed communities$401,189 $790,049 $(388,860)(49.2)%
Costs incurred on behalf of managed communities$401,189 $790,049 $(388,860)(49.2)%
Number of communities (period end)75 100 (25)(25.0)%
Number of units (period end)10,129 18,086 (7,957)(44.0)%
Total average units11,184 21,769 (10,585)(48.6)%

The increase in management fees was primarily attributable to $105.0 million of management termination fees recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020, including the $100.0 million management termination fee payment received from Healthpeak during the three months ended March 31, 2020. We received an $8.6 million management termination fee payment during the three months ended December 31, 2020, of which $5.0 million of management fees were recognized for the three
66


months ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we have completed the transition of management arrangements on 130 net communities since the beginning of the prior year, generally for interim management arrangements on former unconsolidated ventures in which we sold our interest and interim management arrangements on formerly leased or owned communities. During 2021, we expect terminations of a substantial portion of our management arrangements. Management fees of $130.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 include $104.1 million of management fees attributable to communities for which our management agreements were terminated during such period and approximately $18.0 million of management fees attributable to communities that we expect the terminations of our management agreements to occur (or have occurred) during 2021.

The decrease in reimbursed costs and costs incurred on behalf of managed communities was primarily attributable to terminations of management agreements subsequent to the beginning of the prior year.

Operating Results - Other Income and Expense Items

The following table summarizes other income and expense items in our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(in thousands)Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
20202019AmountPercent
General and administrative expense$206,575 $219,289 $(12,714)(5.8)%
Facility operating lease expense224,033 269,666 (45,633)(16.9)%
Depreciation and amortization359,226 379,433 (20,207)(5.3)%
Asset impairment107,308 49,266 58,042 117.8 %
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,303)3,388 (5,691)NM
Interest income4,799 9,859 (5,060)(51.3)%
Interest expense(208,779)(248,341)(39,562)(15.9)%
Gain (loss) on debt modification and extinguishment, net10,896 (5,247)16,143 NM
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures(2,107)(4,544)(2,437)(53.6)%
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net374,532 7,245 367,287 NM
Other non-operating income (loss)5,648 14,765 (9,117)(61.7)%
Benefit (provision) for income taxes(5,352)2,269 (7,621)NM

General and Administrative Expense. The decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily attributable to a reduction in our travel costs due to the pandemic, a reduction in our corporate headcount, as we scaled our general and administrative costs in connection with community dispositions, and a reduction in our incentive compensation costs. The decrease was partially offset by a $3.4 million increase in transaction and organizational restructuring costs compared to the prior year, to $13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Transaction costs include those directly related to acquisition, disposition, financing and leasing activity, and stockholder relations advisory matters, and are primarily comprised of legal, finance, consulting, professional fees, and other third party costs. Organizational restructuring costs include those related to our efforts to reduce general and administrative expense and our senior leadership changes, including severance costs.

Facility Operating Lease Expense. The decrease in facility operating lease expense was primarily due to the Ventas lease portfolio restructuring during the current year and the acquisition of formerly leased communities and lease termination activity since the beginning of the prior year.

Depreciation and Amortization. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to leasehold improvements for certain leased communities becoming fully depreciated and disposition activity since the beginning of the prior year.

Asset Impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded $107.3 million of non-cash impairment charges, primarily for right-of-use assets for certain leased communities with decreased future cash flow estimates as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the prior year we recorded $49.3 million of non-cash impairment charges. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for more information about the impairment charges.

67


Interest Expense. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to interest expense on long-term debt, reflecting the impact of lower interest rates, and the acquisition of communities previously subject to financing leases since the beginning of the prior year.

Gain (Loss) on Debt Modification and Extinguishment, Net. The increase in gain on debt modification and extinguishment was primarily due to a $19.7 million gain on debt extinguishment recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 for the extinguishment of financing lease obligations for the acquisition from Healthpeak of eight communities which were previously subject to sale-leaseback transactions in which we were deemed to have continuing involvement.

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Assets, Net. The increase in gain (loss) on sale of assets, net was primarily due to a $369.8 million gain on sale of assets recognized for the sale of our ownership interest in the CCRC Venture during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes. The difference between our effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was primarily due to the tax impact of the multi-part transaction with Healthpeak that occurred in the three months ended March 31, 2020. The transaction created both federal and state taxable income in the 2020 tax year, requiring the use of all of our federal capital loss carryforwards and a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards reducing the valuation allowance accordingly. This was slightly offset by an increase in state tax expense for the states in which we could not use, or did not have, net operating or capital losses to offset taxable income.

We recorded an aggregate deferred federal, state, and local tax expense of $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The expense includes $93.1 million as a result of the gain on the sale of our ownership interest in the CCRC Venture, offset by a benefit of $115.2 million as a result of the operating losses (exclusive of the CCRC Venture sale) for the year ended December 31, 2020.The tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 is offset by a reduction in valuation allowance of $27.9 million. We recorded an aggregate deferred federal, state, and local tax benefit of $63.0 million as a result of the operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2019, offset by an increase in the valuation allowance of $60.4 million.

We evaluate our deferred tax assets each quarter to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset would not be realized. Our valuation allowance as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was $381.0 million and $408.9 million, respectively.

We recorded interest charges related to our tax contingency reserve for cash tax positions for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 which are included in provision for income tax for the period. Tax returns for years 2016 through 2019 are subject to future examination by tax authorities. In addition, the net operating losses from prior years are subject to adjustment under examination.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section includes the non-GAAP liquidity measure Adjusted Free Cash Flow. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for our definition of the measure and other important information regarding such measure, including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.

68


Liquidity and Indebtedness

The following is a summary of cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities, as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows, and our Adjusted Free Cash Flow:
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
(in thousands)20202019AmountPercent
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$205,649 $216,412 $(10,763)(5.0)%
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(425,111)(225,539)199,572 88.5 %
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities382,913 (139,394)522,307 NM
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash163,451 (148,521)311,972 NM
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year301,697 450,218 (148,521)(33.0)%
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of year$465,148 $301,697 $163,451 54.2 %
Adjusted Free Cash Flow$24,181 $(76,404)$100,585 NM

The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was attributable primarily to $125.5 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic during the current year, decreases in same community revenue and revenue for home health services compared to the prior year, and the $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020. These changes were partially offset by $115.7 million of government grants accepted, the $100.0 million management termination fee payment received from Healthpeak, $87.5 million of cash received under the Medicare accelerated and advance payment program, and $72.7 million of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes deferred during the current year.

The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable to $472.2 million of cash paid for the acquisition of communities during the current year, a $192.0 million increase in purchases of marketable securities compared to the prior year, and a $28.7 million decrease in cash proceeds from notes receivable compared to the prior year. These changes were partially offset by a $238.6 million increase in net proceeds from the sale of assets, a $141.0 million increase in proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, and a $118.2 million decrease in cash paid for capital expenditures compared to the prior year.

The change in net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was primarily attributable to a $641.1 million increase in debt proceeds compared to the prior year. This change was partially offset by a $110.9 million increase in repayment of debt and financing lease obligations compared to the prior year and a $12.3 million increase in cash paid during the current year for financing costs.

The increase in Adjusted Free Cash Flow was primarily attributable to a $96.2 million decrease in non-development capital expenditures, net compared to the prior year, partially offset by the decrease in net cash provided by operating activities.

Our principal sources of liquidity have historically been from:

cash balances on hand, cash equivalents, and marketable securities;
cash flows from operations;
proceeds from our credit facilities;
funds generated through unconsolidated venture arrangements;
proceeds from mortgage financing, refinancing of various assets, or sale-leaseback transactions;
funds raised in the debt or equity markets; and
proceeds from the disposition of assets.

Over the longer-term, we expect to continue to fund our business through these principal sources of liquidity. During 2020, we also received cash grants and advanced/accelerated Medicare payments under programs expanded or created under the CARES Act, and we have elected to utilize the CARES Act payroll tax deferral program, each as described above. As described above, we expect to sell 80% of our equity in our Health Care Services segment pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with HCA Healthcare, which transaction is expected to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021, for expected net cash proceeds of approximately $300 million, subject to the timing of closing with respect to the adjustments set forth in the
69


Purchase Agreement described above. We are evaluating the use of the net proceeds from the pending Health Care Services transaction.

Our liquidity requirements have historically arisen from:

working capital;
operating costs such as employee compensation and related benefits, severance costs, general and administrative expense, and supply costs;
debt service and lease payments;
acquisition consideration, lease termination and restructuring costs, and transaction and integration costs;
capital expenditures and improvements, including the expansion, renovation, redevelopment, and repositioning of our current communities and the development of new communities;
cash collateral required to be posted in connection with our financial instruments and insurance programs;
purchases of common stock under our share repurchase authorizations;
other corporate initiatives (including integration, information systems, branding, and other strategic projects); and
prior to 2009, dividend payments.

Over the near-term, we expect that our liquidity requirements will primarily arise from:

working capital;
operating costs such as employee compensation and related benefits, severance costs, general and administrative expense, and supply costs, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic;
debt service and lease payments;
payment of deferred payroll taxes under the CARES Act;
recoupment of payments received under the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program;
acquisition consideration;
transaction costs and expansion of our healthcare services;
capital expenditures and improvements, including the expansion, renovation, redevelopment, and repositioning of our existing communities;
cash collateral required to be posted in connection with our financial instruments and insurance programs; and
other corporate initiatives (including information systems and other strategic projects).

We are highly leveraged and have significant debt and lease obligations. As of December 31, 2020, we had $3.9 billion of debt outstanding, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.6%. As of such date, 98.2%, or $3.8 billion, of our total debt obligations represented non-recourse property-level mortgage financings. As of December 31, 2020, $1.4 billion of our long-term debt is variable rate debt subject to interest rate cap agreements. The remaining $128.0 million of our long-term variable rate debt is not subject to any interest rate cap agreements. As of December 31, 2020, $80.7 million of letters of credit had been issued under our secured credit facility and separate secured and unsecured letter of credit facilities and no balance was drawn on our secured credit facility.

As of December 31, 2020, we had $1.5 billion of operating and financing lease obligations. For the year ending December 31, 2021, we will be required to make approximately $274.7 million of cash lease payments in connection with our existing operating and financing leases.

Total liquidity of $575.5 million as of December 31, 2020 included $380.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (excluding restricted cash and lease security deposits of $87.9 million in the aggregate), $172.9 million of marketable securities, and $22.2 million of availability on our secured credit facility. Total liquidity as of December 31, 2020 increased $94.2 million from total liquidity of $481.3 million as of December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily attributable to temporary liquidity relief under the CARES Act, the transactions with Healthpeak completed in 2020, including the impact of the related financing transaction, and proceeds from mortgage debt financing, partially offset by the $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020.

We continue to seek opportunities to enhance and preserve our liquidity, including through maintaining expense discipline and increasing occupancy, continuing to evaluate our financing structure and the state of debt markets, seeking further government-sponsored financial relief related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and completing the pending sale of 80% of our equity interest in our Health Care Services segment. There is no assurance that debt financing will continue to be available on terms consistent with our expectations or at all, that our efforts will be successful in seeking further government-sponsored financial relief or regarding the amount of, or conditions required to qualify for, any such relief, or that the closing of the pending transaction will be completed in accordance with our expectations, or at all, or generate cash proceeds to us in the amount we anticipate.
70



We currently estimate that our cash flows from operations, including estimates for stabilizing and growing occupancy in 2021, together with cash balances on hand, cash equivalents, marketable securities, amounts available under our secured credit facility, and proceeds from anticipated dispositions of owned communities, and financings and refinancings of various assets, will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months, assuming the economy and our industry do not further deteriorate substantially as a result of the continuing impacts of the pandemic.

Our actual liquidity and capital funding requirements depend on numerous factors, including our operating results, our actual level of capital expenditures, general economic conditions, and the cost of capital, as well as other factors described in "Item 1A. Risk Factors". Disruptions in the financial markets may have an adverse impact on our liquidity by making it more difficult for us to obtain financing or refinancing. Since the amount of mortgage financing available for our communities is generally dependent on their appraised values and performance, decreases in their appraised values, including due to adverse changes in real estate market conditions, or their performance, could result in available mortgage refinancing amounts that are less than the communities’ maturing indebtedness. If we are unable to obtain refinancing proceeds sufficient to cover maturing indebtedness, our liquidity could be adversely impacted and we may seek alternative sources of financing, which may be less attractive or unavailable. Shortfalls in cash flows from estimated operating results or other principal sources of liquidity may have an adverse impact on our ability to fund our planned capital expenditures, or to pursue any acquisition, investment, development, or potential lease restructuring opportunities that we identify, or to fund investments to support our strategy. In order to continue some of these activities at historical or planned levels, we may incur additional indebtedness or lease financing to provide additional funding. There can be no assurance that any such additional financing will be available or on terms that are acceptable to us.

Our capital expenditures are comprised of community-level, corporate, and development capital expenditures. Community-level capital expenditures include recurring expenditures (routine maintenance of communities over $1,500 per occurrence and for unit turnovers over $500 per unit) and community renovations, apartment upgrades, and other major building infrastructure projects. Corporate capital expenditures include those for information technology systems and equipment, the expansion of our support platform and healthcare services programs, and the remediation or replacement of assets as a result of casualty losses. Development capital expenditures include community expansions, major community redevelopment and repositioning projects, and the development of new communities.

With our development capital expenditures program, we intend to expand, renovate, redevelop, and reposition certain of our communities where economically advantageous. Certain Beneficial Ownersof our communities may benefit from additions and expansions or from adding a new level of service for residents to meet the evolving needs of our customers. These development projects include converting space from one level of care to another, reconfiguration of existing units, the addition of services that are not currently present, or physical plant modifications.

The following table summarizes our capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2020 for our consolidated business:
(in millions)
Community-level capital expenditures, net (1)
$112.3 
Corporate capital expenditures, net (2)
27.3 
Non-development capital expenditures, net (3)
139.6 
Development capital expenditures, net13.7 
Total capital expenditures, net$153.3 

(1)Reflects the amount invested, net of lessor reimbursements of $27.8 million.

(2)Includes $4.1 million of remediation costs at our communities resulting from hurricanes and other natural disasters and for the acquisition of emergency power generators at our impacted Florida communities.

(3)Amount is included in Adjusted Free Cash Flow.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects. As a result, our full-year 2020 non-development capital expenditures, net of lessor reimbursements, and development capital expenditures reflect a $50.4 million and $16.3 million reduction to our pre-pandemic plans for 2020, respectively.

71


In the aggregate, we expect our full-year 2021 non-development capital expenditures, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, to be approximately $140 million. In addition, we expect our full-year 2021 development capital expenditures to be approximately $10 million, net of anticipated lessor reimbursements, and such projects include those for expansion, repositioning, redeveloping, and major renovation of selected existing senior living communities. We anticipate that our 2021 capital expenditures will be funded from cash on hand, cash equivalents, marketable securities, cash flows from operations, and reimbursements from lessors.

Funding our planned capital expenditures, pursuing any acquisition, investment, development, or potential lease restructuring opportunities that we identify, or funding investments to support our strategy may require additional capital. We expect to continue to assess our financing alternatives periodically and access the capital markets opportunistically. If our existing resources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may need to sell additional equity or debt securities. Any such sale of additional equity securities will dilute the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any newly issued equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of our common stock. If we are unable to raise additional funds or obtain them on terms acceptable to us, we may have to delay or abandon our plans.

Credit Facilities

On August 31, 2020, we terminated our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent, lender, and swingline lender and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement had provided commitments for a $250 million revolving credit facility with a $60 million sublimit for letters of credit and a $50 million swingline feature. The credit facility was secured by first priority mortgages on certain of our communities, and availability varied from time to time based on borrowing base calculations related to the appraised value and performance of the communities securing the credit facility and our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement was terminated in connection with our obtaining approximately $266.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing on 16 communities on August 31, 2020, most of which had secured the Credit Agreement prior to its termination. At the closing, we repaid the $166.4 million outstanding principal amount under the Credit Agreement, together with accumulated interest, and without payment of any termination fee or penalty.

On December 11, 2020, we entered into a revolving credit agreement with Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent and lender and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto. The agreement provides a commitment amount of $80 million which can be drawn in cash or as letters of credit. The agreement matures on January 15, 2024. Amounts drawn under the facility will bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus an applicable margin which was 2.75% as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, a quarterly commitment fee of 0.25% per annum was applicable on the unused portion of the facility as of December 31, 2020. The revolving credit facility is currently secured by first priority mortgages and negative pledges on certain of our communities. Available capacity under the facility will vary from time to time based upon borrowing base calculations related to the appraised value and performance of the communities securing the credit facility.

As of December 31, 2020, no borrowings were outstanding on the revolving credit facility, $40.4 million of letters of credit were outstanding, and the revolving credit facility had $22.2 million of availability. We also had separate secured and unsecured letter of credit facilities providing for up to $51.6 million of letters of credit as of December 31, 2020 under which $40.3 million had been issued as of that date.

Long-Term Leases

As of December 31, 2020, we operated 301 communities under long-term leases (235 operating leases and 66 financing leases). The substantial majority of our lease arrangements are structured as master leases. Under a master lease, numerous communities are leased through an indivisible lease. We typically guarantee the performance and lease payment obligations of our subsidiary lessees under the master leases. Due to the nature of such master leases, it is difficult to restructure the composition of our leased portfolios or economic terms of the leases without the consent of the applicable landlord. In addition, an event of default related to an individual property or limited number of properties within a master lease portfolio may result in a default on the entire master lease portfolio.

The leases relating to these communities are generally fixed rate leases with annual escalators that are either fixed or based upon changes in the consumer price index or leased property revenue. We are responsible for all operating costs, including repairs, property taxes, and insurance. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term of our operating and financing leases was 6.7 and 6.3 years, respectively. The lease terms generally provide for renewal or extension options from 5 to 20 years, and, in some instances, purchase options.

72


The community leases contain other customary terms, which may include assignment and change of control restrictions, maintenance and capital expenditure obligations, termination provisions, and financial covenants, such as those requiring us to maintain prescribed minimum liquidity, net worth, and stockholders' equity levels and lease coverage ratios. In addition, our lease documents generally contain non-financial covenants, such as those requiring us to comply with Medicare or Medicaid provider requirements and maintain insurance coverage. Certain leases contain cure provisions, which generally allow us to post an additional lease security deposit if the required covenant is not met.

In addition, certain of our master leases contain radius restrictions, which limit our ability to own, develop, or acquire new communities within a specified distance from certain existing communities covered by such agreements. These radius restrictions could negatively affect our ability to expand, develop, or acquire senior housing communities and operating companies.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, our cash lease payments for our financing leases and operating leases were $67.4 million and $379.6 million, respectively. For the year ending December 31, 2021, we will be required to make approximately $274.7 million of cash lease payments in connection with our existing financing and operating leases.

Debt and Lease Covenants

Certain of our debt and lease documents contain restrictions and financial covenants, such as those requiring us to maintain prescribed minimum liquidity, net worth, and stockholders' equity levels and debt service and lease coverage ratios, and requiring us not to exceed prescribed leverage ratios, in each case on a consolidated, portfolio-wide, multi-community, single-community, and/or entity basis. Net worth is generally calculated as stockholders' equity as calculated in accordance with GAAP, and in certain circumstances, reduced by intangible assets or liabilities or increased by deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions and deferred entrance fee revenue. The debt service and lease coverage ratios are generally calculated as revenues less operating expenses, including an implied management fee and a reserve for capital expenditures, divided by the debt (principal and interest) or lease payment. In addition, our debt and lease documents generally contain non-financial covenants, such as those requiring us to comply with Medicare or Medicaid provider requirements and maintain insurance coverage.

Our failure to comply with applicable covenants could constitute an event of default under the applicable debt or lease documents. Many of our debt and lease documents contain cross-default provisions so that a default under one of these instruments could cause a default under other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders and lessors).

Furthermore, our debt and leases are secured by our communities and, in certain cases, a guaranty by us and/or one or more of our subsidiaries. Therefore, if an event of default has occurred under any of our debt or lease documents, subject to cure provisions in certain instances, the respective lender or lessor would have the right to declare all the related outstanding amounts of indebtedness or cash lease obligations immediately due and payable, to foreclose on our mortgaged communities, to terminate our leasehold interests, to foreclose on other collateral securing the indebtedness and leases, to discontinue our operation of leased communities, and/or to pursue other remedies available to such lender or lessor. Further, an event of default could trigger cross-default provisions in our other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders or lessors). We cannot provide assurance that we would be able to pay the debt or lease obligations if they became due upon acceleration following an event of default.

As of December 31, 2020, we are in compliance with the financial covenants of our debt agreements and long-term leases.

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, we enter into interest rate agreements with major financial institutions to manage our risk above certain interest rates on variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2020, $1.4 billion of our debt is variable rate debt subject to interest rate cap agreements. The remaining $128.0 million of our long-term variable rate debt is not subject to any interest rate cap agreements.

73


Contractual Commitments

The following table presents a summary of our material indebtedness, including the related interest payments, lease, and other contractual commitments, as of December 31, 2020.
Payments Due during the Year Ending December 31,
(in millions)Total20212022202320242025Thereafter
 
Contractual Obligations:
Principal on long-term debt(1)
$3,943.5 $73.7 $352.4 $234.4 $304.2 $293.0 $2,685.8 
Interest on long-term debt(2)
885.0 143.3 133.3 121.7 116.4 104.4 265.9 
Long-term debt4,828.5 217.0 485.7 356.1 420.6 397.4 2,951.7 
Financing lease obligations(3)
431.3 64.9 65.5 66.3 67.5 57.5 109.6 
Operating lease obligations(4)
1,257.2 209.8 192.8 192.4 192.0 190.0 280.2 
Total contractual obligations$6,517.0 $491.7 $744.0 $614.8 $680.1 $644.9 $3,341.5 

(1)Excludes debt discount and deferred financing costs of $27.5 million as of December 31, 2020.
(2)Represents contractual interest for all fixed-rate obligations and assumes interest on variable rate instruments at the December 31, 2020 rate.
(3)Reflects future cash lease payments after giving effect to fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) and variable payments estimated utilizing the applicable index or rate as of December 31, 2020. The cash payments for financing lease obligations exclude $413.4 million of financing lease obligations recognized on our consolidated balance sheet for purchase option liabilities and for sale-leaseback transactions in which we have not transferred control of the underlying asset.
(4)Reflects future cash payments after giving effect to fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) and variable payments estimated utilizing the applicable index or rate as of December 31, 2020.

Our capital expenditure plans for 2021 include required minimum spend of approximately $18 million for capital expenditures
under certain of our community leases. Additionally, we are required to spend an average of approximately $26 million per year for each of the following four years and approximately $17 million thereafter under the initial lease terms of such leases.

The foregoing amounts exclude outstanding letters of credit aggregating to $80.7 million as of December 31, 2020.

Impacts of Inflation

Resident fees and management fees are our primary sources of revenue. These revenues are affected by the amount of the monthly resident fee rates we charge and community occupancy rates. The rates charged at communities are highly dependent on local market conditions and the competitive environment in which the communities operate. Substantially all of our senior housing residency agreements allow for adjustments in the monthly fee payable every 12 or 13 months which enables us to seek increases in monthly fees due to inflation, increased levels of care, or other factors. Any pricing increases would be subject to market and competitive conditions and could result in a decrease in occupancy in the communities. We believe, however, that our ability to periodically adjust the monthly fee serves to reduce the adverse effect of inflation. In addition, salaries, wages, and the costs of benefits are a principal element of facility operating expense and are also dependent upon local market conditions and general inflationary pressures. There can be no assurance that monthly resident fee rates can be increased, or that costs will not increase, above inflation rates whether due to inflation or other causes.

Increases in prevailing interest rates as a result of inflation or other factors will increase our payment obligations on our variable-rate obligations to the extent they are unhedged and may increase our future borrowing and hedging costs. Although we have interest rate cap agreements in place for a majority of our variable-rate debt, these agreements only limit our exposure to increases in interest rates above certain levels and generally must be renewed every two to three years. As of December 31, 2020, $128.0 million of our outstanding variable-rate indebtedness is not subject to interest rate cap agreements.

74


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2020, we do not have an interest in any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors.

We own an interest in certain unconsolidated ventures as described under Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in each venture. The equity method of accounting has been applied in the accompanying financial statements with respect to our investment in unconsolidated ventures.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. We believe the following accounting estimates are the most critical as they require assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made and changes in the estimate, or different estimates that could have been selected, could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. These estimates are based on our best judgment about current and future conditions, but actual results could differ from those estimates. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

As of December 31, 2020, our long-lived assets were comprised primarily of $5.1 billion and $0.8 billion of net property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles and operating lease right-of-use assets, respectively.

We test long-lived assets for recoverability annually during our fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is assessed by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group through operation or disposition, calculated utilizing the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. If this comparison indicates that the carrying amount of an asset group is not recoverable, we are required to recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.

In estimating the recoverability of asset groups for purposes of our long-lived asset impairment testing, we utilize future cash flow projections that are generally developed internally. Any estimates of future cash flow projections necessarily involve predicting unknown future circumstances and events and require significant management judgments and estimates. In arriving at our cash flow projections, we consider our historic operating results, approved budgets and business plans, future demographic factors, expected growth rates, estimated asset holding periods, and other factors. In estimating the future cash flows of asset groups for purposes of our long-lived asset impairment test, we make certain key assumptions. Those assumptions include future revenues, facility operating expenses, and cash flows, including sales proceeds that we would receive upon a sale of the assets using estimated capitalization rates in the case of communities. We corroborate the estimated capitalization rates we use in these calculations with capitalization rates observable from recent market transactions.

Determining the future cash flows of an asset group involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. These estimates and assumptions include revenue and expense growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows. Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments. Future events that may result in impairment charges include differences in the projected occupancy rates or monthly service fee rates, changes in the cost structure of existing communities, and our decision to dispose of assets, either through sales or lease terminations. Significant adverse changes in our future revenues and/or operating margins, significant changes in the market for senior housing, or the valuation of the real estate of senior living communities, as well as other events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, increased competition and changing economic or market conditions, could result in changes in estimated future cash flows and the determination that additional assets are impaired.

During 2020, we evaluated long-lived depreciable assets and lease right-of-use assets and determined that the carrying amount of these assets exceeded the undiscounted cash flows for certain of our communities. Estimated fair values were determined for
75


these certain communities and we recorded asset impairment charges of $29.3 million for property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles and $76.3 million for operating lease right-of-use assets during the year ended in December 31, 2020. These impairment charges are primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected operating performance at these communities and reflect the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceeded their estimated fair value. During 2020, there was a wide range of possible outcomes as a result of the pandemic, as there was a high degree of uncertainty about its ultimate impacts. In arriving at our cash flow projections, we considered our estimates of the impacts of the pandemic. Management’s estimates of the impacts of the pandemic are highly dependent on variables that are difficult to predict, as further described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data". Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments.

During 2019, we evaluated long-lived depreciable assets and lease right-of-use assets and determined that the undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying amount of these assets for all except a small number of communities. Estimated fair values were determined for these certain properties and we recorded asset impairment charges of $27.2 million for property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles and $10.2 million for operating lease right-of-use assets during the year ended in December 31, 2019. These impairment charges are primarily due to our decision to dispose of assets, either through sales or lease terminations, or lower than expected performance of the underlying communities and equal the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed their estimated fair value.

During 2018, we evaluated long-lived depreciable assets and determined in each year that the undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying amount of these assets for all except a small number of communities. Estimated fair values were determined for these certain properties and we recorded asset impairment charges of $78.0 million for 2018, for property, plant and equipment, and leasehold intangibles. These impairment charges are primarily due to our decision to dispose of assets, either through sales or lease terminations, or lower than expected performance of the underlying communities and equal the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed the estimated fair value.

Our impairment loss assessment contains uncertainties because it requires us to apply judgment to estimate whether there have been changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable, the recoverability of asset groups, and, if necessary, the fair value of our assets. As we periodically perform this assessment, changes in our estimates and assumptions may cause us to realize material impairment charges in the future. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy of our estimate of the future cash flows of assets, future changes in the assumptions used to make these estimates could result in the recording of an impairment loss.

Goodwill Impairment

As of December 31, 2020, we had a goodwill balance of $154.1 million. Goodwill recorded in connection with business combinations is allocated to the respective reporting unit and included in our application of the provisions of ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. Factors we consider important in our analysis of whether an indicator of impairment exists include a significant decline in our stock price or market capitalization for a sustained period since the last testing date, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, and significant negative industry or economic trends. We are not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless we determine, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The quantitative goodwill impairment test is based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit's carrying amount. The fair values used in the quantitative goodwill impairment test are estimated based upon discounted future cash flow projections for the reporting unit. These cash flow projections are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions such as revenue and expense growth rates, capitalization rates, and discount rates. We also consider market-based measures such as earnings multiples in our analysis of estimated fair values of our reporting units. If the quantitative goodwill impairment test results in a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeding its estimated fair value, an impairment charge will be recorded based on the difference, with the impairment charge limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.

In estimating the fair value of our reporting units for purposes of our quantitative goodwill impairment testing, we utilize the income approach, which includes future cash flow projections that are developed internally. Any estimates of future cash flow projections necessarily involve predicting unknown future circumstances and events and require significant management judgments and estimates. In arriving at our cash flow projections, we consider our historic operating results, approved budgets and business plans, future demographic factors, expected revenue and expense growth rates, and other factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic. In using the income approach to estimate the fair value of reporting units for purposes of our goodwill
76


impairment testing, we make certain key assumptions. Those assumptions include future revenues, facility operating expenses, and cash flows, including sales proceeds that we would receive upon a sale of the assets, using estimated capitalization rates in the case of communities. We corroborate the estimated capitalization rates we use in these calculations with capitalization rates observable from recent market transactions. Future cash flows are discounted at a rate that is consistent with a weighted average cost of capital from a market participant perspective. The weighted average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by equity and debt holders of a business enterprise.

Goodwill allocated to our Independent Living and Health Care Services reporting units is $27.3 million and $126.8 million as of December 31, 2020, respectively. Our annual and interim goodwill impairment analyses did not result in any impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2020. Based on the results of our goodwill impairment analysis, we estimated that the fair value of our Independent Living reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount by approximately 25% as of December 31, 2020.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment analysis as of March 31, 2020, which included reduced estimates of projected future cash flows as a result of changes to significant assumptions using information known or knowable about the COVID-19 pandemic, including current industry and economic trends, changes in business plans, and changes in expected revenue and facility operating expense growth rates. Additionally, we considered the additional risk within the future cash flow estimates when selecting risk-adjusted discount rates. During 2020, there was a wide range of possible outcomes as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as there was a high degree of uncertainty about its ultimate impacts. Management’s estimates of the impacts of the pandemic are highly dependent on variables that are difficult to predict, as described above. Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments.

During 2018, we identified qualitative indicators of impairment of our goodwill, including a significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization for a sustained period during the three months ended March 31, 2018. As a result, we performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2018, which included a comparison of the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit's carrying amount. In estimating the fair value of the reporting units for purposes of the quantitative goodwill impairment test, we utilized an income approach, which included future cash flow projections that are developed internally. Based on the results of the quantitative goodwill impairment test, we determined that the carrying amount of our Assisted Living and Memory Care segment exceeded its estimated fair value by more than the $351.7 million carrying amount of goodwill as of March 31, 2018. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $351.7 million to goodwill within the Assisted Living and Memory Care segment for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. These estimates and assumptions include revenue and expense growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates. Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments. Future events that may result in impairment charges include differences in the projected occupancy rates or monthly service fee rates, changes in the cost structure of existing communities, changes in reimbursement rates from Medicare for healthcare services, and changes in healthcare reform. Significant adverse changes in our future revenues and/or operating margins, significant changes in the market for senior housing or the valuation of the real estate of senior living communities, as well as other events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, increased competition, changes in reimbursement rates from Medicare for healthcare services, and changing economic or market conditions, including market control premiums, could result in changes in fair value and the determination that additional goodwill is impaired.

Our impairment loss assessment contains uncertainties because it requires us to apply judgment to estimate whether there has been a decline in the fair value of our reporting units, including estimating future cash flows, and if necessary, the fair value of our assets and liabilities. As we periodically perform this assessment, changes in our estimates and assumptions may cause us to realize material impairment charges in the future. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy of our estimate of the fair value of our reporting units, future changes in the assumptions used to make these estimates could result in the recording of an impairment loss.

77


Self-Insurance Liability Accruals

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Although we maintain general liability and professional liability insurance policies for our owned, leased, and managed communities under a master insurance program, our current policies provide for deductibles for each and every claim. As a result, we are effectively self-insured for claims that are less than the deductible amounts. In addition, we maintain a high-deductible workers compensation program. Third-party insurers are responsible for claim costs above program deductibles and retentions.

Outstanding losses and expenses for general liability, professional liability, and workers compensation are estimated based on the recommendations of independent actuaries and management's estimates. The actuarial methods develop estimates of the future ultimate claim costs based on the claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. We review the adequacy of our accruals related to these liabilities on an ongoing basis, using historical claims, actuarial valuations, third-party administrator estimates, consultants, advice from legal counsel, and industry data, and adjust accruals periodically. Estimated costs related to these self-insurance programs are accrued based on known claims and projected claims incurred but not yet reported. These estimates require significant judgment, and as a result these estimates are uncertain and our actual exposure may be different from our estimates. Subsequent changes in actual experience are monitored and estimates are updated as information becomes available.

As of December 31, 2020, we accrued reserves of $127.9 million for general liability, professional liability, and workers compensation programs. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, we reduced our estimate of the amount of aggregate accrued liabilities for these programs based on recent claims experience, resulting in decreases to operating expenses by $4.2 million, $11.3 million, and $14.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contained in "Item 8. Financial Statement and Supplementary Data" for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains the financial measures Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow, which are not calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Presentations of these non-GAAP financial measures are intended to aid investors in better understanding the factors and trends affecting our performance and liquidity. However, investors should not consider these non-GAAP financial measures as a substitute for financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, including net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, or net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. We caution investors that amounts presented in accordance with our definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies because not all companies calculate non-GAAP measures in the same manner. We urge investors to review the following reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures from the most comparable financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance measure that we define as net income (loss) excluding: benefit/provision for income taxes, non-operating income/expense items, and depreciation and amortization; and further adjusted to exclude income/expense associated with non-cash, non-operational, transactional, cost reduction, or organizational restructuring items that management does not consider as part of our underlying core operating performance and that management believes impact the comparability of performance between periods. For the periods presented herein, such other items include non-cash impairment charges, gain/loss on facility lease termination and modification, operating lease expense adjustment, amortization of deferred gain, change in future service obligation, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and transaction and organizational restructuring costs. Transaction costs include those directly related to acquisition, disposition, financing, and leasing activity, and stockholder relations advisory matters, and are primarily comprised of legal, finance, consulting, professional fees, and other third party costs. Organizational restructuring costs include those related to our efforts to reduce general and administrative expense and our senior leadership changes, including severance.

We believe that presentation of Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure is useful to investors because (i) it is one of the metrics used by our management for budgeting and other planning purposes, to review our historic and prospective core operating performance, and to make day-to-day operating decisions; (ii) it provides an assessment of operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely revenues and the controllable cost structure of the organization, by eliminating items related to our financing and capital structure and other items that management does not consider as part of our underlying core operating performance and that management believes impact the comparability of performance between
78


periods; and (iii) we believe that this measure is used by research analysts and investors to evaluate our operating results and to value companies in our industry.

Adjusted EBITDA has material limitations as a performance measure, including: (i) excluded interest and income tax are necessary to operate our business under our current financing and capital structure; (ii) excluded depreciation, amortization, and impairment charges may represent the wear and tear and/or reduction in value of our communities, goodwill, and other assets and may be indicative of future needs for capital expenditures; and (iii) we may incur income/expense similar to those for which adjustments are made, such as gain/loss on sale of assets, facility lease termination and modification, or debt modification and extinguishment, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and transaction and other costs, and such income/expense may significantly affect our operating results.

The table below reconciles Adjusted EBITDA from net income (loss).
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Net income (loss)$81,945 $(268,492)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes5,352 (2,269)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated ventures2,107 4,544 
Loss (gain) on debt modification and extinguishment, net(10,896)5,247 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(374,532)(7,245)
Other non-operating (income) loss(5,648)(14,765)
Interest expense208,779 248,341 
Interest income(4,799)(9,859)
Income (loss) from operations(97,692)(44,498)
Depreciation and amortization359,226 379,433 
Asset impairment107,308 49,266 
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,303)3,388 
Operating lease expense adjustment(136,276)(19,453)
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense20,747 23,026 
Transaction and organizational restructuring costs13,377 10,007 
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$264,387 $401,169 
(1)Adjusted EBITDA includes:
$115.7 million benefit for the year ended December 31, 2020 of Provider Relief Funds and other government grants recognized in other operating income
$119.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 for the one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020
$100.0 million benefit for the year ended December 31, 2020 for the management agreement termination fee payment received from Healthpeak
$23.1 million of negative non-recurring net impact for the year ended December 31, 2019 from the application of the lease accounting standard effective January 1, 2019

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

Adjusted Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP liquidity measure that we define as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities before: distributions from unconsolidated ventures from cumulative share of net earnings, changes in prepaid insurance premiums financed with notes payable, changes in operating lease liability for lease termination, cash paid/received for gain/loss on facility lease termination and modification, and lessor capital expenditure reimbursements under operating leases; plus: property insurance proceeds and proceeds from refundable entrance fees, net of refunds; less: non-development capital expenditures and payment of financing lease obligations. Non-development capital expenditures are comprised of corporate and community-level capital expenditures, including those related to maintenance, renovations, upgrades, and other major building infrastructure projects for our communities and is presented net of lessor reimbursements. Non-development capital expenditures do not include capital expenditures for: community expansions, major community redevelopment and repositioning projects, and the development of new communities.

79


We believe that presentation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow as a liquidity measure is useful to investors because (i) it is one of the metrics used by our management for budgeting and other planning purposes, to review our historic and prospective sources of operating liquidity, and to review our ability to service our outstanding indebtedness, pay dividends to stockholders, engage in share repurchases, and make capital expenditures, including development capital expenditures; and (ii) it provides an indicator to management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.

Adjusted Free Cash Flow has material limitations as a liquidity measure, including: (i) it does not represent cash available for dividends, share repurchases, or discretionary expenditures since certain non-discretionary expenditures, including mandatory debt principal payments, are not reflected in this measure; (ii) the cash portion of non-recurring charges related to gain/loss on facility lease termination generally represent charges/gains that may significantly affect our liquidity; and (iii) the impact of timing of cash expenditures, including the timing of non-development capital expenditures, limits the usefulness of the measure for short-term comparisons.

The table below reconciles Adjusted Free Cash Flow from net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$205,649 $216,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(425,111)(225,539)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities382,913 (139,394)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$163,451 $(148,521)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$205,649 $216,412 
Distributions from unconsolidated ventures from cumulative share of net earnings(766)(3,472)
Changes in assets and liabilities for lessor capital expenditure reimbursements under operating leases(22,242)(31,305)
Non-development capital expenditures, net(139,592)(235,797)
Payment of financing lease obligations(18,868)(22,242)
Adjusted Free Cash Flow$24,181 $(76,404)

(1) Adjusted Free Cash Flow includes transaction and organizational restructuring costs of $13.4 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Additionally, Adjusted Free Cash Flow for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes:
$115.7 million benefit from Provider Relief Funds and other government grants accepted
$119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with our lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020
$100.0 million benefit from the management agreement termination fee payment received from Healthpeak
$87.5 million benefit from accelerated/advanced Medicare payments received
$72.7 million benefit from payroll taxes deferred


Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to market risks from changes in interest rates charged on our credit facilities and other variable-rate indebtedness. The impact on earnings and the value of our long-term debt and lease payments are subject to change as a result of movements in market rates and prices. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $2.4 billion of long-term fixed rate debt and $1.5 billion of long-term variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2020, our total fixed-rate debt and variable-rate debt outstanding had a weighted average interest rate of 3.59%.

In the normal course of business, we enter into certain interest rate cap agreements with major financial institutions to manage our risk above certain interest rates on variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2020, $2.4 billion, or 61.2%, of our long-term debt has fixed rates. As of December 31, 2020, $1.4 billion, or 35.5%, of our long-term debt is variable rate debt subject to interest rate cap agreements. The remaining $128.0 million, or 3.3%, of our long-term debt is variable rate debt not subject to any interest rate cap agreements. Our outstanding variable rate debt is indexed to LIBOR, and accordingly our annual interest expense related to variable rate debt is directly affected by movements in LIBOR. After consideration of hedging instruments currently in place, increases in LIBOR of 100, 200 and 500 basis points would have resulted in additional annual interest
80


expense of $15.5 million, $31.0 million and $66.1 million, respectively. Certain of our variable debt instruments include springing provisions that obligate us to acquire additional interest rate caps in the event that LIBOR increases above certain levels, and the implementation of those provisions would result in additional mitigation of interest costs.

81


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE

82


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule included in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 25, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Adoption of ASU No. 2016-02

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), and the related amendments.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

83


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Evaluation of Goodwill for Impairment
Description of the MatterAs of December 31, 2020, the Company's consolidated balance sheet included goodwill of $154.1 million. As discussed in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is qualitatively, and when necessary quantitatively, tested for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter at the reporting unit level.

Auditing management's evaluation of goodwill allocated to the health care services reporting unit for impairment was complex and involved a high degree of subjectivity due to the significant estimation required to estimate the fair value of the health care services reporting unit. In particular, the fair value estimate was sensitive to significant assumptions including the estimation of revenue and expense growth rates, discount rates, and earnings multiples, which are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company's goodwill impairment review process, including controls over management's review of the significant assumptions described above.

To test the estimated fair value of the Company's health care services reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to estimate fair value, testing the significant assumptions used to develop the fair value estimate, and testing the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis for completeness and accuracy. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, and evaluated whether changes to the Company's business and other relevant factors would affect the significant assumptions. The evaluation of the Company's methodology and key assumptions was performed with the assistance of our valuation specialists. We assessed the historical accuracy of the Company's estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the health care services reporting unit that would result from changes in the significant assumptions.
84


Evaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment and Leasehold Intangibles, Net and Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets for Impairment
Description of the MatterAs of December 31, 2020, the Company's consolidated balance sheet included property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net and operating lease right-of-use assets of $5.1 billion and $0.8 billion, respectively. As discussed in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net and operating lease right-of-use assets are routinely evaluated for indicators of impairment. For property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net and operating lease right-of-use assets with indicators of impairment, the Company compares the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of each long-lived asset group to its carrying amount. If the long-lived asset group's carrying amount exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the fair value of the long-lived asset group is then estimated by management and compared to its carrying amount. An impairment charge is recognized on these long-lived assets when carrying amount exceeds fair value.

Auditing management's evaluation of property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net and operating lease right-of-use assets for impairment was complex and involved a high degree of subjectivity due to the significant estimation required to determine the estimated undiscounted future cash flows and fair values of long-lived asset groups where indicators of impairment were determined to be present. In particular, the future cash flows and fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions including the estimation of revenue and expense growth rates and capitalization rates, which are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company's process to evaluate property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net and operating lease right-of-use assets for impairment, including controls over management's review of the significant assumptions described above.

To test the Company's evaluation of long-lived asset groups for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to estimate future cash flows and estimate fair values, testing the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates of future cash flows and fair values, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends and evaluated whether changes to the Company's business and other relevant factors would affect the significant assumptions. The evaluation of the Company's methodology and key assumptions was performed with the assistance of our valuation specialists. We assessed the historical accuracy of the Company's estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the undiscounted future cash flows and fair values of the long-lived asset groups that would result from changes in the key assumptions.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1993
Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2021

85


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Brookdale Senior Living Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule included in the Index at Item 15 and our report dated February 25, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2021
86


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except stock amounts)
December 31,
20202019
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$380,420 $240,227 
Marketable securities172,905 68,567 
Restricted cash28,059 26,856 
Accounts receivable, net109,221 133,613 
Assets held for sale16,061 42,671 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net66,937 84,241 
Total current assets773,603 596,175 
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net5,068,060 5,109,834 
Operating lease right-of-use assets788,138 1,159,738 
Restricted cash56,669 34,614 
Investment in unconsolidated ventures4,898 21,210 
Goodwill154,131 154,131 
Other assets, net56,259 118,731 
Total assets$6,901,758 $7,194,433 
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt$68,885 $339,413 
Current portion of financing lease obligations19,543 63,146 
Current portion of operating lease obligations146,226 193,587 
Trade accounts payable71,233 104,721 
Accrued expenses287,851 266,703 
Refundable fees and deferred revenue96,995 79,402 
Total current liabilities690,733 1,046,972 
Long-term debt, less current portion3,847,103 3,215,710 
Financing lease obligations, less current portion543,764 771,434 
Operating lease obligations, less current portion819,429 1,277,178 
Deferred tax liability9,557 15,397 
Other liabilities188,443 169,017 
Total liabilities6,099,029 6,495,708 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2020 and 2019; 0 shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2020 and 2019; 198,331,663 and 199,593,343 shares issued and 187,804,138 and 192,128,586 shares outstanding (including 4,349,421 and 7,252,459 unvested restricted shares), respectively1,983 1,996 
Additional paid-in-capital4,212,409 4,172,099 
Treasury stock, at cost; 10,527,525 and 7,464,757 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(102,774)(84,651)
Accumulated deficit(3,311,184)(3,393,088)
Total Brookdale Senior Living Inc. stockholders' equity800,434 696,356 
Noncontrolling interest2,295 2,369 
Total equity802,729 698,725 
Total liabilities and equity$6,901,758 $7,194,433 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
87


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Revenue
Resident fees$2,892,567 $3,209,931 $3,449,211 
Management fees130,690 57,108 71,986 
Reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of managed communities401,189 790,049 1,010,229 
Other operating income115,749 
Total revenue and other operating income3,540,195 4,057,088 4,531,426 
Expense
Facility operating expense (excluding facility depreciation and amortization of $334,768, $349,215, and $407,427, respectively)2,341,859 2,390,495 2,453,328 
General and administrative expense (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $20,747, $23,026, and $26,067, respectively)206,575 219,289 259,475 
Facility operating lease expense224,033 269,666 303,294 
Depreciation and amortization359,226 379,433 447,455 
Asset impairment107,308 49,266 489,893 
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,303)3,388 162,001 
Costs incurred on behalf of managed communities401,189 790,049 1,010,229 
Total operating expense3,637,887 4,101,586 5,125,675 
Income (loss) from operations(97,692)(44,498)(594,249)
Interest income4,799 9,859 9,846 
Interest expense:
Debt(153,817)(177,718)(188,505)
Financing lease obligations(48,534)(66,353)(83,604)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount(6,428)(4,270)(8,160)
Gain (loss) on debt modification and extinguishment, net10,896 (5,247)(11,677)
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures(2,107)(4,544)(8,804)
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net374,532 7,245 293,246 
Other non-operating income (loss)5,648 14,765 14,099 
Income (loss) before income taxes87,297 (270,761)(577,808)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes(5,352)2,269 49,456 
Net income (loss)81,945 (268,492)(528,352)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest74 561 94 
Net income (loss) attributable to Brookdale Senior Living Inc. common stockholders$82,019 $(267,931)$(528,258)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Brookdale Senior Living Inc. common stockholders:
Basic$0.45 $(1.44)$(2.82)
Diluted$0.44 $(1.44)$(2.82)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic183,498 185,907 187,468 
Diluted184,386 185,907 187,468 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
88


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Total equity, balance at beginning of period$698,725 $1,018,413 $1,530,291 
Common stock:
Balance at beginning of period$1,996 $1,968 $1,913 
Issuance of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan
Restricted stock, net(9)31 26 
Shares withheld for employee taxes(6)(5)(4)
Other, net32 
Balance at end of period$1,983 $1,996 $1,968 
Additional paid-in-capital:
Balance at beginning of period$4,172,099 $4,151,147 $4,126,549 
Compensation expense related to restricted stock grants20,747 23,026 26,067 
Issuance of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan638 1,160 1,468 
Issuance of warrants22,883 
Restricted stock, net(31)(26)
Shares withheld for employee taxes(4,037)(3,308)(3,057)
Other, net70 105 146 
Balance at end of period$4,212,409 $4,172,099 $4,151,147 
Treasury stock:
Balance at beginning of period$(84,651)$(64,940)$(56,440)
Purchase of treasury stock(18,123)(19,711)(8,500)
Balance at end of period$(102,774)$(84,651)$(64,940)
Accumulated deficit:
Balance at beginning of period$(3,393,088)$(3,069,272)$(2,541,294)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note 2)(115)(55,885)
Net income (loss)82,019 (267,931)(528,258)
Other, net280 
Balance at end of period$(3,311,184)$(3,393,088)$(3,069,272)
Noncontrolling interest:
Balance at beginning of period$2,369 $(490)$(437)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest(74)(561)(94)
Noncontrolling interest contribution6,566 41 
Noncontrolling interest distribution(3,146)
Balance at end of period$2,295 $2,369 $(490)
Total equity, balance at end of period$802,729 $698,725 $1,018,413 
Common stock share activity
Outstanding shares of common stock:
Balance at beginning of period192,129 192,356 191,276 
Issuance of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan224 181 207 
Restricted stock, net(830)3,073 2,593 
Shares withheld for employee taxes(656)(476)(439)
Purchase of treasury stock(3,063)(3,005)(1,281)
Balance at end of period187,804 192,129 192,356 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
89


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)$81,945 $(268,492)$(528,352)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Loss (gain) on debt modification and extinguishment, net(10,896)5,247 11,677 
Depreciation and amortization, net365,654 383,703 455,615 
Asset impairment107,308 49,266 489,893 
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated ventures2,107 4,544 8,804 
Distributions from unconsolidated ventures from cumulative share of net earnings766 3,472 2,896 
Amortization of deferred gain(4,358)
Amortization of entrance fees(2,122)(1,634)(1,670)
Proceeds from deferred entrance fee revenue734 3,544 3,218 
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision(5,840)(2,654)(52,367)
Operating lease expense adjustment(136,276)(19,453)(17,218)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(374,532)(7,245)(293,246)
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,303)3,388 140,957 
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense20,747 23,026 26,067 
Non-cash interest expense on financing lease obligations10,894 
Non-cash management contract termination gain(969)(8,724)
Other(2,777)(8,700)(1,292)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net24,277 292 (4,964)
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net24,707 55,873 26,762 
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses27,294 (12,984)(37,307)
Refundable fees and deferred revenue62,614 (25,117)(128)
Operating lease assets and liabilities for lessor capital expenditure reimbursements22,242 31,305 10,400 
Operating lease assets and liabilities for lease termination(33,596)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities205,649 216,412 203,961 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Change in lease security deposits and lease acquisition deposits, net3,569 (859)1,163 
Purchase of marketable securities(378,269)(186,224)(14,823)
Sale and maturities of marketable securities275,000 134,000 293,273 
Capital expenditures, net of related payables(185,871)(304,092)(225,473)
Acquisition of assets, net of related payables and cash received(472,193)(497)(271,771)
Investment in unconsolidated ventures(4,082)(4,346)(9,124)
Distributions received from unconsolidated ventures9,635 12,850 
Proceeds from sale of assets, net331,316 92,735 499,807 
Proceeds from notes receivable5,419 34,109 1,580 
Property insurance proceeds1,292 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(425,111)(225,539)288,774 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from debt963,099 321,996 606,921 
Repayment of debt and financing lease obligations(538,859)(427,923)(896,744)
Proceeds from line of credit166,381 200,000 
Repayment of line of credit(166,381)(200,000)
Purchase of treasury stock, net of related payables(18,123)(23,955)(4,256)
Payment of financing costs, net of related payables(19,649)(7,309)(16,317)
Proceeds from refundable entrance fees, net of refunds(422)
Payments for lease termination(12,548)
Payments of employee taxes for withheld shares(4,037)(3,313)(3,061)
Other482 1,110 1,364 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities382,913 (139,394)(325,063)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash163,451 (148,521)167,672 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period301,697 450,218 282,546 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$465,148 $301,697 $450,218 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
90


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.       Description of Business

Brookdale Senior Living Inc. ("Brookdale" or the "Company") is an operator of senior living communities throughout the United States. The Company is committed to providing senior living solutions primarily within properties that are designed, purpose-built, and operated to provide quality service, care, and living accommodations for residents. The Company operates and manages independent living, assisted living, memory care, and continuing care retirement communities ("CCRCs"). The Company also offers a range of home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services to residents of many of its communities and to seniors living outside of its communities.

The Company has 5 reportable segments: Independent Living; Assisted Living and Memory Care; CCRCs; Health Care Services; and Management Services.

2.       Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Except for the changes for the impact of the recently adopted accounting pronouncements discussed in this Note, the Company has consistently applied its accounting policies to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting policies are summarized below:

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brookdale and Related Stockholder Matters” belowits consolidated subsidiaries. The ownership interest of consolidated entities not wholly-owned by the Company are presented as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation, and net income (loss) is reduced by the portion of net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. The Company reports investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies it has the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting.

The Company evaluates its potential variable interest entity ("VIE") relationships under certain criteria as provided for in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810, Consolidation ("ASC 810"). ASC 810 broadly defines a VIE as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity's activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity's activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The Company performs this evaluation on an ongoing basis and consolidates any VIEs for which the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, as determined by the Company's power to direct the VIE's activities and the obligation to absorb its losses or the right to receive its benefits, which are potentially significant to the VIE.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, revenue, other operating income, asset impairments, self-insurance reserves, performance-based compensation, the allowance for credit losses, depreciation and amortization, leasing transactions, income taxes, and other contingencies. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from the original estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Resident Fees

Resident fee revenue is reported at the amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for the services provided. These amounts are due from residents or third-party payors and include variable consideration for retroactive adjustments from estimated reimbursements, if any, under reimbursement programs. Performance obligations are
91


determined based on the nature of the services provided. Resident fee revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied.

Under the Company's senior living residency agreements, which are generally for a descriptioncontractual term of 30 days to one year, the Company provides senior living services to residents for a stated daily or monthly fee. The Company has elected the lessor practical expedient within ASC 842, Leases ("ASC 842") and recognizes, measures, presents, and discloses the revenue for services under the Company's senior living residency agreements based upon the predominant component, either the lease or nonlease component, of the contracts. The Company has determined that the services included under the Company's independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements have the same timing and pattern of transfer and are performance obligations that are satisfied over time. The Company recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606") for its independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements for which it has estimated that the nonlease components of such residency agreements are the predominant component of the contract.

The Company enters into contracts to provide home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services. Each service provided under the contract is capable of being distinct, and thus, the services are considered individual and separate performance obligations. The performance obligations are satisfied as services are provided and revenue is recognized as services are provided.

The Company receives payment for services under various third-party payor programs which include Medicare, Medicaid, and other third-party payors. Estimates for settlements with third-party payors for retroactive adjustments from estimated reimbursements due to audits, reviews, or investigations are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing services. The Company estimates the transaction price based on the terms of the contract with the payor, correspondence with the payor, and historical payment trends. Changes to these estimates for retroactive adjustments are recognized in the period the change or adjustment becomes known or when final settlements are determined.

Billings for services under third-party payor programs are recorded net of estimated retroactive adjustments, if any. Retroactive adjustments are accrued on an estimated basis in the period the related services are rendered and adjusted in future periods or as final settlements are determined. Contractual or cost related adjustments from Medicare or Medicaid are accrued when assessed (without regard to when the assessment is paid or withheld). Subsequent adjustments to these accrued amounts are recorded in net revenues when known.

Management Services

The Company manages certain communities under contracts which provide periodic management fee payments to the Company and reimbursement for costs and expense related to such communities. Management fees are generally determined by an agreed upon percentage of gross revenues (as defined in the management agreement). Certain management contracts also provide for an annual incentive fee to be paid to the Company upon achievement of certain metrics identified in the contract. The Company has determined that all community management activities are a single performance obligation, which is satisfied over time as the services are rendered. The Company estimates the amount of incentive fee revenue expected to be earned, if any, during the annual contract period and revenue is recognized as services are provided.The Company's estimate of the transaction price for management services also includes the amount of reimbursement due from the owners of the communities for services provided and related costs incurred. Such revenue is included in "reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of managed communities" on the consolidated statements of operations. The related costs are included in "costs incurred on behalf of managed communities" on the consolidated statements of operations.

Government Grants

The Company recognizes income for government grants on a systematic and rational basis over the periods in which the Company recognizes the related expenses or loss of revenue for which the grants are intended to compensate when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the applicable terms and conditions of the grant and there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received.

Lease Accounting

Refer to the Company's revenue recognition policy for discussion of the accounting policy for residency agreements, which include a lease component.

92


The following is the Company's lease accounting policy subsequent to the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. Refer to Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements in this Note 2for significant changes that resulted from the adoption. The Company, as lessee, recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the Company's consolidated balance sheet for its community, office, and equipment leases. As of the commencement date of a lease, a lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset is established on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at the present value of future minimum lease payments. The Company's community leases generally contain fixed annual rent escalators or annual rent escalators based on an index, such as the consumer price index. The future minimum lease payments recognized on the consolidated balance sheet include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) and variable payments estimated utilizing the index or rate on the lease commencement date. The Company recognizes lease expense as incurred for additional variable payments. For the Company's leases that do not contain an implicit rate, the Company utilizes its estimated incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of lease payments based on information available at commencement of the lease. The Company's estimated incremental borrowing rate reflects the fixed rate at which the Company could borrow a similar amount for the same term on a collateralized basis. The Company elected the short-term lease exception policy which permits leases with an initial term of 12 months or less to not be recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and instead to be recognized as lease expense as incurred.

The Company, as lessee, makes a determination with respect to each of its community, office, and equipment leases as to whether each should be accounted for as an operating lease or financing lease. The classification criteria is based on estimates regarding the fair value of the leased asset, minimum lease payments, effective cost of funds, economic life of the asset, and certain other terms in the lease agreements.

Lease right-of-use assets are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of right-of-use assets are assessed by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, calculated utilizing the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset then the fair value of the asset is estimated. The impairment expense is determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the asset to its carrying amount, with any amount in excess of fair value recognized as an expense in the current period. Undiscounted cash flow projections and estimates of fair value amounts are based on a number of assumptions such as revenue and expense growth rates and estimated lease coverage ratios (Level 3).

Operating Leases

The Company recognizes operating lease expense for actual rent paid, generally plus or minus a straight-line adjustment for estimated minimum lease escalators if applicable. The right-of-use asset is generally reduced each period by an amount equal to the difference between the operating lease expense and the amount of expense on the lease liability utilizing the effective interest method. Subsequent to the impairment of an operating lease right-of-use asset, the Company recognizes operating lease expense consisting of the reduction of the right-of-use asset on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term and the amount of expense on the lease liability utilizing the effective interest method.

Financing Leases

Financing lease right-of-use assets are recognized within property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes interest expense on the financing lease liabilities utilizing the effective interest method. The right-of-use asset is generally amortized to depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term unless the lease contains an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. If the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the purchase option, the asset is amortized over the useful life.

Sale-Leaseback Transactions

For transactions in which an owned community is sold and leased back from the buyer (sale-leaseback transactions), the Company recognizes an asset sale and lease accounting is applied if the Company has transferred control of the community. For such transactions, the Company removes the transferred assets from the consolidated balance sheet and a gain or loss on the sale is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the transaction price for the sale transaction.

For sale‑leaseback transactions in which the Company has not transferred control of the underlying asset, the Company does not recognize an asset sale or derecognize the underlying asset until control is transferred. For such transactions, the Company recognizes the underlying assets within assets under financing leases as a component of property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net on the consolidated balance sheets and continues to depreciate the assets over their useful lives.
93


Additionally, the Company accounts for any amounts received as a financing lease liability and the Company recognizes interest expense on the financing lease liability utilizing the effective interest method with the interest expense limited to an amount that is not greater than the cash payments on the financing lease liability over the term of the lease.

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Assets

The Company regularly enters into real estate transactions which may include the disposition of certain communities, including the associated real estate. The Company recognizes gain or loss from real estate sales when the transfer of control is complete.

The Company recognizes gain or loss from the sale of equity method investments when the transfer of control is complete and the Company has no continuing involvement with the transferred financial assets.

Purchase Accounting

For the acquisition of assets that do not meet the definition of a business, the Company accounts for the transaction as an asset acquisition at the purchase price, including acquisition costs, allocated among the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including identified intangible assets and liabilities, based upon the relative fair values using Level 3 inputs at the date of acquisition.

For acquisitions of a business, the Company accounts for the transaction as a business combination pursuant to the acquisition method and assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identified intangible assets and liabilities, are recorded at fair value. In determining the allocation of the purchase price of companies and communities to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the Company makes estimates of fair value using information obtained as a result of pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, leasing activities, and/or independent appraisals.

In connection with a business combination, the excess of the fair value of liabilities assumed and common stock issued and cash paid over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred.

Deferred Financing Costs

Third-party fees and costs incurred to obtain debt are recorded as a direct adjustment to the carrying amount of debt and amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective yield method, over the term of the related debt. Unamortized deferred financing fees are written-off if the associated debt is retired before the maturity date. Upon the refinancing of mortgage debt or amendment of the line of credit, unamortized deferred financing fees and additional financing costs incurred are accounted for in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishments.

Stock-Based Compensation

Measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock compensation is based on the grant-date fair value of the employee stock awards, which is based on the quoted price of the Company's common shares on the grant date for the majority of the Company's awards. Generally, this cost is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the employee's requisite service period. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur and any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed for forfeited awards. Awards that vest over a requisite service period, other than those with performance or market conditions, generally vest ratably in annual installments over a period of three to four years. Incremental compensation costs arising from subsequent modifications of awards after the grant date are recognized when incurred.

Certain of the Company's employee stock awards vest only upon the achievement of performance conditions. The Company recognizes compensation cost only when achievement of performance conditions is considered probable. Consequently, the Company’s determination of the amount of stock compensation expense requires judgment in estimating the probability of achievement of these performance conditions. Performance conditioned awards that vest dependent upon attainment of various levels of performance that equal or exceed threshold levels generally vest based upon performance at the end of a three-year performance period. The number of shares that ultimately vest can range from 0% to 125% of the stock awards granted depending on the level of achievement of the performance criteria.

Certain of the Company's employee stock awards vest only upon the achievement of a market condition where the measurement period is three years and vesting of the awards is based on the Company's level of attainment of a specified total stockholder return relative to the percentage appreciation of a specified index of companies for the respective three-year measurement period. Compensation expense for awards with market conditions is recognized over the service period, which is generally four
94


years, and the actual achievement of the market condition does not impact expense recognition. The Company uses a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the grant date fair value of such awards. Depending on the results achieved during the three-year measurement period, the number of shares that ultimately vest may range from 0% to 150% of the stock awards granted. The expected volatility of the Company's common stock at the date of grant was estimated based on a historical average volatility rate for the approximate three-year performance period and the estimated expected weighted average volatility was 42.5% and 45.2% for awards granted in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on observed interest rates consistent with the approximate three-year measurement period and the estimated weighted average risk free interest rate was 1.4% and 2.4% for awards granted in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

For all share-based awards with graded vesting other than performance conditioned awards, the Company records compensation expense for the entire award on a straight-line basis (or, if applicable, on the accelerated method) over the requisite service period. For performance conditioned awards, total compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as if the award is, in substance, multiple awards once the performance condition is deemed probable of achievement. Performance conditions are evaluated quarterly. If such conditions are not ultimately met or it is not probable the conditions will be achieved, no compensation expense for performance conditioned awards is recognized and any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability approach which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. When it is determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset is made and reflected in income. This determination is made by considering various factors, including the reversal and timing of existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and estimates of future taxable income exclusive of the reversal of temporary differences.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value measurements are based on a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 – fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities beneficially ownedare investments in commercial paper and short-term corporate bond instruments with maturities of greater than 90 days as of their acquisition date by our directors.

the Company.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable are reported net of an allowance for credit losses to represent the Company's estimate of expected losses at the balance sheet date. The adequacy of the Company's allowance for credit losses is reviewed on an ongoing basis, using historical payment trends, write-off experience, analyses of receivable portfolios by payor source and aging of receivables, a review of specific accounts, as well as expected future economic conditions and market trends, and adjustments are made to the allowance as necessary.

Assets Held for Sale

The Company designates communities as held for sale when certain criteria are met, including when management has committed to a plan to sell the community and the sale is probable within one year of the reporting date. The Company records
95


these assets on the consolidated balance sheet at the lesser of the carrying amount and fair value less estimated selling costs. If the carrying amount is greater than the fair value less the estimated selling costs, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company evaluates the fair value of the assets held for sale each period to determine if it has changed. The long-lived assets are not depreciated while classified as held for sale.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Leasehold Intangibles, Net

Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:

Guy P. Sansone

Non-Executive Chairman & Class II
Independent Director

Director Since: October 2019

Age:55

Public Company Directorships:

•  Magellan Health, Inc.
(2019 – current)

•  Civitas Solutions, Inc.
(2009 – 2019)

•  Rotech Healthcare Inc.
(2004 – 2005)

Mr. Sansone joined Brookdale’s Board in October 2019 and becameNon-Executive Chairman of the Board in January 2020. For more than 25 years, he has led efforts to optimize the performance of healthcare and senior housing companies. Mr. Sansone has served as Chairman and CEO of H2 Health, a leading regional provider of physical rehabilitation services and clinician staffing solutions, since February 2020. Prior to that, he served as a Managing Director of Alvarez & Marsal, a global professional services firm specializing in performance improvement for large, high profile businesses, where he served as Chairman of the firm’s Healthcare Industry Group, which he founded in 2004. Mr. Sansone also served as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Visiting Nurse Service of New York, the largestnon-profit home and community-based health care organization in the United States, from November 2014 to December 2016 and, prior to that, served in various executive roles at numerous healthcare companies. His prior experience in the senior housing industry includes having served as Chief Restructuring Officer and a member of the Board of Erickson Retirement Communities and as a senior consultant to Sunrise Senior Living. Mr. Sansone has served on the Board of Directors of Magellan Health, Inc. since March 2019 and previously served on the Board of Directors of Civitas Solutions, Inc. from 2009 until its acquisition in March 2019. He also serves and has served on the Boards of Directors of numerous investor-owned andnot-for-profit companies, primarily in the healthcare industry. Mr. Sansone earned a B.S. in Economics from the State University of New York at Albany.

Mr. Sansone’s executive, senior advisory and board leadership of public and private organizations, including his extensive service to companies in the healthcare and senior housing industries, led to the conclusion that he should serve as a member of the Board.

Asset CategoryEstimated
Useful Life
(in years)

Buildings and improvements
40
Furniture and equipment3 – 10
Resident lease intangibles1 – 3


Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Renovations and improvements, which improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the renovations or improvements. For communities subject to operating or financing leases, leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets or the term of the lease. For financing leases that have a purchase option the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, the leasehold improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful life. Facility operating expense excludes facility depreciation and amortization.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is assessed by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group through operation or disposition, calculated utilizing the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. If this comparison indicates that the carrying amount of an asset group is not recoverable, the Company is required to recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value, with any amount in excess of fair value recognized as an expense in the current period. Undiscounted cash flow projections and estimates of fair value amounts are based on a number of assumptions such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimated holding periods, and estimated capitalization rates (Level 3).

Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures

In accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation, the general partner or managing member of a venture consolidates the venture unless the limited partners or other members have either (1) the substantive ability to dissolve the venture or otherwise remove the general partner or managing member without cause or (2) substantive participating rights in significant decisions of the venture, including authorizing operating and capital decisions of the venture, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business.

The initial carrying amount of investments in unconsolidated ventures is based on the amount paid to purchase the investment interest contributed to the unconsolidated ventures. The Company's reported share of earnings of an unconsolidated venture is adjusted for the impact, if any, of basis differences between its carrying amount of the equity investment and its share of the venture's underlying assets.

Distributions received from an investee are recognized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the investment. If distributions are received from an investee that would reduce the carrying amount of an equity method investment below zero, the Company evaluates the facts and circumstances of the distributions to determine the appropriate accounting for the excess distribution, including an evaluation of the source of the proceeds and implicit or explicit commitments to fund the investee. The excess distribution is either recorded as a gain on investment, or in instances where the source of proceeds is from financing activities or the Company has a significant commitment to fund the investee, the excess distribution would result in an equity method liability and the Company would continue to record its share of the investee's earnings and losses.

The Company evaluates realization of its investment in ventures accounted for using the equity method if circumstances indicate that the Company's investment is other than temporarily impaired. A current fair value of an investment that is less than its carrying amount may indicate a loss in value of the investment. If the Company determines that an equity method investment
96


is other than temporarily impaired, it is recorded at its fair value with an impairment charge recognized in asset impairment expense for the difference between its carrying amount and fair value based on Level 3 inputs.

Goodwill

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. Factors the Company considers important in its analysis of whether an indicator of impairment exists include a significant decline in the Company's stock price or market capitalization for a sustained period since the last testing date, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, and significant negative industry or economic trends. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If so, the Company performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit's carrying amount. The fair values used in the quantitative goodwill impairment test are estimated using Level 3 inputs based upon discounted future cash flow projections for the reporting unit. These cash flow projections are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions such as revenue and expense growth rates, capitalization rates, and discount rates. The Company also considers market-based measures such as earnings multiples in its analysis of estimated fair values of its reporting units. If the quantitative goodwill impairment test results in a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeding its estimated fair value, an impairment charge will be recorded based on the difference, with the impairment charge limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.

Self-Insurance Liability Accruals

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although the Company maintains general liability and professional liability insurance policies for its owned, leased, and managed communities under a master insurance program, the Company's current policies provide for deductibles for each and every claim. As a result, the Company is, in effect, self-insured for claims that are less than the deductible amounts. In addition, the Company maintains a high deductible workers compensation program and a self-insured employee medical program.

The Company reviews the adequacy of its accruals related to these liabilities on an ongoing basis using historical claims, actuarial valuations, third-party administrator estimates, consultants, advice from legal counsel, and industry data, and adjusts accruals periodically. Estimated costs related to these self-insurance programs are accrued based on known claims and projected claims incurred but not yet reported. Subsequent changes in actual experience are monitored, and estimates are updated as information becomes available.

Treasury Stock

The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders' equity.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13") ASU 2016-13 replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology for credit losses with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020 and recognized the cumulative effect of the adoption as an immaterial adjustment to beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2020.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"), which amends the former accounting principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for most leases. Additionally, ASU 2016-02 made targeted changes to lessor accounting, including changes to align certain aspects with the revenue recognition model, and enhanced disclosure of lease arrangements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases, Targeted Improvements ("ASU 2018-11"), which provides entities with a transition method option to not restate comparative periods presented, but to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, and a practical expedient allowing lessors to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease components when certain criteria are met. The Company adopted these lease accounting standards effective January 1, 2019 and utilized the modified retrospective transition method with no adjustments to comparative periods presented. Additionally, the Company elected the package of practical expedients within ASU 2016-02 that allows an entity to not reassess, as of January 1, 2019, its
97


prior conclusions on whether an existing contract contains a lease, lease classification for existing leases, and whether costs incurred for existing leases qualify as initial direct costs. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient which would have allowed it to revisit key assumptions, such as lease term, that were made when it originally entered into the lease.

The Company's adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of operating lease liabilities of $1.6 billion and right-of-use assets of $1.3 billion on the consolidated balance sheet for its existing community, office, and equipment operating leases based on the remaining present value of the minimum lease payments as of January 1, 2019. The future minimum lease payments recognized on the consolidated balance sheet included fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) and variable payments estimated utilizing the index or rate as of January 1, 2019. Such right-of-use asset amounts were recognized based upon the amount of the recognized lease liabilities, adjusted for accrued lease payments, intangible assets, and the recognition of right-of-use asset impairments. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a net liability of $231.4 million recognized on its consolidated balance sheet for accrued lease payments and intangible assets for operating leases. Additionally, $58.1 million of previously unrecognized right-of-use asset impairments were recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019. As a result of the Company's election of the package of practical expedients within ASU 2016-02, there were no changes to the classification of the Company's existing operating and financing leases as of January 1, 2019 and there were no changes to the amounts recognized on its consolidated balance sheet for its existing financing leases as of January 1, 2019. Additionally, the application of ASU 2016-02 resulted in a $10.2 million increase to the amount of asset impairment expense recognized for operating lease right-of-use assets for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, lessors are required to separately recognize and measure the lease component of a contract with a customer utilizing the provisions of ASC 842 and the nonlease components utilizing the provisions of ASC 606. To separately account for the components, the transaction price is allocated among the components based upon the estimated stand-alone selling prices of the components. Additionally, certain components of a contract which were previously included within the lease element recognized in accordance with ASC 840, Leases ("ASC 840") prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 (such as common area maintenance services, other basic services, and executory costs) are recognized as nonlease components subject to the provisions of ASC 606 subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. However, entities are permitted to elect the practical expedient under ASU 2018-11 allowing lessors to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease components when certain criteria are met. Entities that elect to utilize the lease/nonlease component combination practical expedient under ASU 2018-11 upon initial application of ASC 842 are required to apply the practical expedient to all new and existing transactions within a class of underlying assets that qualify for the expedient as of the initial application date.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized revenue for housing services under independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements in accordance with the provisions of the former lease accounting standard, ASC 840, and the Company recognized revenue for assistance with activities of daily living ("ADLs"), memory care services, healthcare, and personalized health services under independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements in accordance with the provisions of ASC 606.

Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 and ASU 2018-11, the Company elected the lessor practical expedient within ASU 2018-11 and recognizes, measures, presents, and discloses the revenue for housing services under the Company's senior living residency agreements based upon the predominant component, either the lease or nonlease component, of the contracts rather than allocating the consideration and separately accounting for it under ASC 842 and ASC 606.

The nonlease components of the Company's independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements are the predominant component of the contract for the Company's existing agreements as of January 1, 2019. As a result of the Company's election of the package of practical expedients within ASU 2016-02, the Company continued to recognize revenue for existing contracts as of December 31, 2018 over the lease term. In addition, ASU 2016-02 has changed the definition of initial direct costs of a lease, with the initial direct costs that are initially deferred and recognized over the term of the lease limited to costs that are both incremental and direct. The Company concluded that the contract origination costs recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 were in excess of the initial direct costs that would have been deferred under the provisions of ASU 2016-02. As a result of the Company's election of the package of practical expedients, the contract origination costs recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 continued to be amortized during 2019 over the lease term. Additionally, the Company concluded that certain costs previously deferred upon new contract origination are recognized within facility operating expense in 2019 as incurred.

In addition to the previously unrecognized right-of-use asset impairment of $58.1 million, the Company recognized cumulative effect adjustments to beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019 for the impact of the adoption of accounting standards by its equity method investees and the deferred tax impact of these adjustments. The recognition of the right-of-use
98


assets and corresponding liabilities and the removal of the deferred tax position related to these leases as of December 31, 2018 had a $0.3 million impact on the Company's net deferred tax position. A deferred tax asset of $14.1 million and an increase to the valuation allowance of $13.8 million was recorded against accumulated deficit reflecting the tax impact of the previously unrecognized right-of-use asset impairments.

The adoption of the new accounting standards resulted in the following adjustments to the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019:

Lucinda M. Baier

Class I Director, President(in millions)

Assets
Prepaid expenses and Chief
Executive Officer

Director Since: February 2018

Age:55

Public Company Directorships:

•  The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
(2007 – 2016)

other current assets, net
$67 

Ms. Baier has served as Brookdale’s President

Property, plant and Chief Executive Officerequipment and as a member of the Board since February 2018, after having served as Brookdale’s Chief Financial Officer since December 2015. Ms. Baier joined Brookdale from Navigant Consulting, Inc., a specialized global expert services firm, where she served as Executive Vice Presidentleasehold intangibles, net(11)
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,329 
Investment in unconsolidated ventures(2)
Other intangible assets, net(5)
Other assets, net(73)
Total assets$1,305 
Liabilities and Chief Financial Officer since 2013. In addition, Ms. Baier has had multi-billion dollar operations responsibility, been the chief executive officer for a publicly-traded retailer,Equity
Refundable fees and served as an executive officer of a Fortune 30 company. Ms. Baier currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing & Care Industry (NIC)deferred revenue$43 
Operating lease obligations1,618 
Deferred liabilities(257)
Other liabilities(43)
Total liabilities1,361 
Total equity(56)
Total liabilities and the Nashville Health Care Council where she chairs its finance and investment committee. Ms. Baier is a Certified Public Accountant and a graduate of Illinois State University, with B.S. and M.S. degrees in Accounting.

Ms. Baier’s appointment as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer after demonstrating her abilities as a change-oriented executive as our Chief Financial Officer and in multiple leadership roles at other companies led to the conclusion that she should serve as a member of the Board.

equity
$1,305 


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). The provisions of this standard are available for election through December 31, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating its contracts and the optional expedients provided by this update.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation, with no effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

3. COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and likely will continue to adversely impact the senior living industry and the Company's business. Due to the average age and prevalence of chronic medical conditions among the Company's residents and patients, they generally are at disproportionately higher risk of hospitalization and adverse outcomes if they contract COVID-19. The Company continues to serve and care for seniors at its communities and their homes through the pandemic.

Upon confirmation of positive COVID-19 exposure at a community, the Company takes actions intended to minimize further exposure, including associates’ adhering to personal protection protocols, isolating residents or finding placement in an alternate care setting to best address their care needs, and in some cases, restricting new resident admissions as directed by local health authorities. Seeking to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into the Company's communities, and to help control further exposure to infections within communities, in March 2020 the Company began restricting visitors at all its communities to essential healthcare personnel and certain compassionate care situations, screening associates and permitted visitors, suspending group outings, modifying communal dining and programming to comply with social distancing guidelines and, in most cases, implementing in-room only dining and activities programming, requesting that residents refrain from leaving the community unless medically necessary, and requiring new residents and residents returning from a hospital or nursing home to
99


isolate in their apartment for fourteen days. The Company began easing restrictions on a community-by-community basis in July 2020. These restrictions may continue for some time, and the Company may revert to more restrictive measures if the pandemic worsens, as necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, or at the direction of local health authorities.

The pandemic, including the related restrictions at the Company's communities, have significantly disrupted demand for senior living communities and the sales process, which typically includes in-person prospective resident visits within communities. The pandemic began to adversely impact the Company's occupancy and resident fee revenue during March 2020, as new resident leads, visits (including virtual visits), and move-in activity declined significantly compared to typical levels. Further deterioration of the Company's resident fee revenue will result from lower move-in activity and the resident attrition inherent in its business, which may increase due to the impacts of COVID-19. The Company's home health average daily census also began to decrease in March 2020 due to lower occupancy in its communities and fewer elective medical procedures and hospital discharges.

Facility operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $125.5 million of incremental direct costs to prepare for and respond to the pandemic, including costs for: acquisition of additional personal protective equipment ("PPE"), medical equipment, and cleaning and disposable food service supplies; enhanced cleaning and environmental sanitation; increased employee-related costs, including labor, workers compensation, and health plan expense; increased expense for general liability claims; and COVID-19 testing of residents and associates where not otherwise covered by government payor or third-party insurance sources. The Company is not able to reasonably predict the total amount of costs it will incur related to the pandemic, and such costs may continue to be substantial. The Company also recorded non-cash impairment charges in its operating results of $105.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 for its operating lease right-of-use assets and property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected operating performance at communities with impaired assets.

The Company has taken, and continues to take, actions to enhance and preserve its liquidity in response to the pandemic. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company completed its financing plans in the regular course of business, including refinancing substantially all of its 2020 and 2021 maturities. In addition, on August 31, 2020, the Company terminated its $250 million revolving credit facility and obtained $266.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing on 16 communities, most of which had secured the credit facility prior to its termination. See Note 9 for further information regarding the Company's financings. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants under the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund ("Provider Relief Fund") and $87.5 million of accelerated/advanced Medicare payments, and it deferred $72.7 million of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes. These programs were created or expanded under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 ("CARES Act"), as described below. The Company also delayed or canceled a number of elective capital expenditure projects and suspended repurchases under its existing share repurchase program. On July 26, 2020, the Company restructured its 120 community triple-net master lease with Ventas, Inc. ("Ventas") in a multipart transaction. The components included, among other things, reducing the Company's initial annual minimum rent to $100 million, representing a reduction of approximately $86 million over the twelve months ending June 30, 2021, and removal of the prior requirements that the Company satisfy financial covenants and maintain a security deposit with Ventas. The Company paid a $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment to Ventas in connection with the Company's lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020. See Note 4 for more information about the Ventas lease restructuring.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company's total liquidity was $575.5 million, consisting of $380.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, $172.9 million of marketable securities, and $22.2 million of availability on its secured credit facility. The Company continues to seek opportunities to enhance and preserve its liquidity, including through maintaining expense discipline, continuing to evaluate its financing structure and the state of debt markets, and seeking further government-sponsored financial relief related to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no assurance that debt financing will continue to be available on terms consistent with the Company's expectations or at all, or that the Company's efforts will be successful in seeking further government-sponsored financial relief or regarding the amount of, or conditions required to qualify for, any such relief.

The CARES Act, signed into law on March 27, 2020, and Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, signed into law on April 24, 2020, provide liquidity and financial relief to certain businesses, among other things. The impacts to the Company of certain provisions of the CARES Act are summarized below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company accepted $109.8 million of cash for grants from the Provider Relief Fund, under which grants have been made available to eligible healthcare providers for healthcare related expenses or
100


lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. The accepted grants were made available pursuant to the following distributions from the Provider Relief Fund:

$101.7 million pursuant to General Distributions, with the aggregate amount ultimately determined based on a percentage of the Company's year-over-year changes in patient care revenue and certain operating and other expenses for the first and second quarters of 2020.

$4.6 million pursuant to the Skilled Nursing Facility Targeted Distribution, which generally related to the Company's certified skilled nursing facilities.

$3.5 million pursuant to the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution, including incentive payments, which related to the Company's skilled nursing care provided through its CCRCs.

Grants received from the Provider Relief Fund are subject to the terms and conditions of the program, including that such funds may only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and will reimburse only for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to COVID-19 and have not been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are not obligated to reimburse. The permissible uses of grants from the Nursing Home Infection Control Distribution are further limited to certain infection control expenses. The program requires the Company to report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") on its use of the grants, and its reporting is subject to audit.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized $109.8 million of the grants as other operating income based upon its estimates of its satisfaction of the conditions of the grants during such period and the cash received for grants has been presented within net cash provided by operating activities within the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company received $87.5 million under the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program administered by CMS, which was temporarily expanded by the CARES Act. Approximately $75.2 million related to the Company's Health Care Services segment and the remainder related to the Company's CCRCs segment. Under the program, the Company requested acceleration/advancement of 100% of its Medicare payment amount for a three-month period. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act, enacted on October 1, 2020, amended the repayment terms for accelerated/advanced payments. As amended, recoupment of accelerated/advanced payments will begin one year after payments were issued. Payments will be recouped at a rate of 25% of Medicare payments for the first eleven months following the anniversary of issuance and at a rate of 50% of Medicare payments for the next six months. Any outstanding balance of accelerated/advanced payments will be due following such recoupment period. As of December 31, 2020, $44.6 million was included in refundable fees and deferred revenue and $42.9 million was included in other liabilities within the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The $87.5 million received has been presented within net cash provided by operating activities within the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.

Under the CARES Act, the Company has elected to defer payment of the employer portion of social security payroll taxes incurred from March 27, 2020 through December 31, 2020. One-half of such deferral amount will become due on each of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has deferred payment of $72.7 million under the program and has presented $36.3 million of this amount in accrued expenses and the remainder in other liabilities within the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

The CARES Act temporarily suspended the 2% Medicare sequestration for the period May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, which primarily benefited the Company's Health Care Services segment. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, extended the sequestration suspension through March 31, 2021.

In addition to the grants described above, the Company has received and recognized $5.9 million of other operating income from grants from other government sources.

The Company cannot predict with reasonable certainty the impacts that COVID-19 ultimately will have on its business, results of operations, cash flow, and liquidity, and its response efforts may continue to delay or negatively impact its strategic initiatives, including plans for future growth. The ultimate impacts of COVID-19 will depend on many factors, some of which cannot be foreseen, including the duration, severity, and breadth of the pandemic and any resurgence of the disease; the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s economy and debt and equity markets and the local economies in its markets; the development, availability, utilization, and efficacy of COVID-19 testing, therapeutic agents, and vaccines and the prioritization of such resources among businesses and demographic groups; government financial and regulatory relief efforts that may become
101


available to business and individuals, including its ability to qualify for and satisfy the terms and conditions of financial relief; perceptions regarding the safety of senior living communities during and after the pandemic; changes in demand for senior living communities and the Company's ability to adapt its sales and marketing efforts to meet that demand; the impact of COVID-19 on its residents’ and their families’ ability to afford its resident fees, including due to changes in unemployment rates, consumer confidence, housing markets, and equity markets caused by COVID-19; changes in the acuity levels of its residents; the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on seniors generally and those residing in its communities; the duration and costs of its response efforts, including increased equipment, supplies, labor, litigation, testing, vaccination clinic, and other expenses; the impact of COVID-19 on its ability to complete financings, refinancings, or other transactions (including dispositions) or to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest and lease payments and to satisfy financial and other covenants in its debt and lease documents; increased regulatory requirements, including unfunded, mandatory testing; increased enforcement actions resulting from COVID-19; government action that may limit its collection or discharge efforts for delinquent accounts; and the frequency and magnitude of legal actions and liability claims that may arise due to COVID-19 or its response efforts.

4.       Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Other Significant Transactions

During 2018 through 2020, the Company acquired 33 communities that the Company formerly leased or managed, disposed of an aggregate of 43 owned communities (including the conveyance of five communities to Ventas), and sold substantially all of its ownership interests in unconsolidated ventures. The Company also entered into transactions with Ventas, announced on July 27, 2020, Healthpeak Properties, Inc. ("Healthpeak") announced on October 1, 2019, and Welltower Inc. ("Welltower") announced during 2018, which together restructured a significant portion of the Company's triple-net lease obligations with the Company's largest lessors. As a result of such transactions, as well as other lease expirations and terminations, the Company's triple-net lease obligations on 104 communities were terminated from 2018 to 2020 (89 in 2018, 10 in 2019, and 5 in 2020). As of December 31, 2020, the Company owned 350 communities, leased 301 communities, and managed 75 communities.

The following table sets forth the amounts included within the Company's consolidated financial statements for the 147 communities that it disposed through sales, conveyances, and lease terminations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 through the respective disposition dates:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Resident fees
Independent Living$$$81,279 
Assisted Living and Memory Care14,080 50,775 284,627 
CCRCs20,495 64,791 84,186 
Senior housing resident fees$34,575 $115,566 $450,092 
Facility operating expense
Independent Living$$$48,161 
Assisted Living and Memory Care13,008 43,880 211,546 
CCRCs19,997 58,813 74,898 
Senior housing facility operating expense$33,005 $102,693 $334,605 
Cash lease payments$4,696 $9,011 $91,169 

As of December 31, 2020, 3 communities were classified as held for sale, resulting in $16.1 million being recorded as assets held for sale within the consolidated balance sheet. NaN of such communities are in the Assisted Living and Memory Care segment and 1 is in the CCRCs segment. The closings of the various pending and expected transactions are, or will be, subject to the satisfaction of various closing conditions, including (where applicable) the receipt of regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the transactions will close or, if they do, when the actual closings will occur.

Completed Dispositions of Owned Communities

In addition to the conveyance of 5 communities to Ventas, during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company completed the sale of 2 owned communities for cash proceeds of $38.1 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized a net gain on sale of assets of $2.7 million.

102


During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company completed the sale of 14 owned communities for cash proceeds of $85.4 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized a net gain on sale of assets of $5.5 million. The Company utilized a portion of the cash proceeds from the asset sales to repay approximately $5.1 million of associated mortgage debt and debt prepayment penalties.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company completed the sale of 22 owned communities for cash proceeds of $380.7 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized a net gain on sale of assets of $188.6 million. The Company utilized a portion of the cash proceeds from the asset sales to repay approximately $174.0 million of associated mortgage debt and debt prepayment penalties.

2020 Ventas Lease Restructuring

On July 26, 2020 (the "Effective Date"), the Company entered into definitive agreements with Ventas in connection with the restructuring of the Company’s lease arrangements with Ventas, including a Master Transaction Letter Agreement (the "Master Agreement"). Pursuant to the Master Agreement:

On the Effective Date the parties entered into the Amended and Restated Master Lease and Security Agreement (the "Master Lease") and Amended and Restated Guaranty (the "Guaranty"), which amended and restated the prior Master Lease and Security Agreement and prior Guaranty, each dated as of April 26, 2018 and as amended from time to time. Pursuant to the Master Lease, the Company continues to lease 120 communities for an aggregate initial annual minimum rent of approximately $100 million, which reflects a reduction of approximately $83 million of annual minimum rent in effect prior to the transaction. Effective on January 1 of each lease year, beginning January 1, 2022, the annual minimum rent will be subject to a 3% escalator. The initial term of the Master Lease ends December 31, 2025, with 2 10-year extension options available to the Company. The annual minimum rent for the initial lease year of any such renewal term will be the greater of the fair market rental of the communities or the increased annual minimum rent for such lease year applying the foregoing 3% escalator. The Master Lease removed the prior provision that would have automatically extended the initial term in the event of the consummation of a change of control transaction by the Company. The Master Lease requires the Company to spend (or escrow with Ventas) a minimum of $1,500 per unit on a community-level basis and $3,600 per unit on an aggregate basis of all communities, in each case per 24-month period ending December 31 during the lease term, commencing with the 24-month period ending December 31, 2021. In addition, Ventas has agreed to fund costs associated with certain pre-approved capital expenditure projects in the aggregate amount of up to $37.8 million. Upon disbursement of such expenditures, the annual minimum rent under the Master Lease will increase by the amount of the disbursement multiplied by 50% of the sum of the then current 10-year treasury note rate and 4.5%. The transaction agreements with Ventas further provide that the Master Lease and certain other agreements between the parties will be cross-defaulted.

The Company’s subsidiaries’ obligations under the Master Lease are guaranteed at the parent level pursuant to the Guaranty. The Guaranty removed the prior requirements that the Company satisfy, at the parent level, financial covenants and that the Company maintain a security deposit with Ventas. The Guaranty also removed the prior right of Ventas to terminate the Master Lease on the basis of parent level financial covenants. Pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty, the Company may consummate a change of control transaction without the need for consent of Ventas so long as certain objective conditions are satisfied, including the post-transaction guarantor’s maintaining a minimum tangible net worth of at least $600.0 million, having minimum levels of operational experience and reputation in the senior living industry, and paying a change of control fee of $25.0 million to Ventas. The Guaranty removed the prior provisions that would have required that such post-transaction guarantor satisfy a maximum leverage ratio level, that the Company fund additional capital expenditures, and that the Company extend the term upon the occurrence of the change in control transaction. Under the terms of the Guaranty, commencing January 1, 2024 (and until such time (if any) as the Company exercises its lease term extension option with respect to the Master Lease), Ventas shall have the right to terminate the Master Lease (with respect to one or more communities), provided that the trailing twelve month coverage ratio of each such community is less than 0.9x and provided further that the removal and termination of any such communities does not result in a portfolio coverage ratio with respect to the remaining communities in the Master Lease that is less than the portfolio coverage ratio prior to such removal and termination.

On the Effective Date, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Omnibus Agreement with Ventas, which provides that if a default occurs and is continuing under certain other material leases or under certain material financings and if the same continues beyond the permitted cure period or the applicable landlord or lender exercises any material remedies, Ventas shall have the right to transition all or a portion of the communities from the Master Lease to a management arrangement with the Company pursuant to a market management agreement (which is
103


terminable by either party). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Ventas may only transition one or more communities from the Master Lease to a management arrangement if such transition does not result in a portfolio coverage ratio with respect to the remaining communities in the Master Lease that is less than the portfolio coverage ratio prior to such transition.
On the Effective Date, the Company conveyed 5 owned communities to Ventas in full release and satisfaction of $78.4 million principal amount of indebtedness secured by the communities. Upon closing, the parties entered into new terminable, market rate management agreements pursuant to which the Company manages the communities. The Company also paid to Ventas $115.0 million in cash, released all security deposits to Ventas under the former guaranty (which included the release of a $42.4 million deposit held by Ventas and the payment of $4.2 million in cash as settlement of the amount of letters of credit), and issued a $45.0 million unsecured interest-only promissory note to Ventas. The initial interest rate of the promissory note is 9.0% per annum and will increase by 0.50% on each anniversary of the date of issuance. The Company may prepay the outstanding principal amount in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The promissory note matures on the earlier of December 31, 2025 or the occurrence of a change of control transaction (as defined in the Guaranty).

On the Effective Date, the Company issued to Ventas a warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase 16.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price per share of $3.00. The Warrant is exercisable at Ventas' option at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, until December 31, 2025. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable on exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, including for cash dividends, stock dividends, stock splits, reclassifications, non-cash distributions, certain repurchases of common stock and business combination transactions. To the extent that the number of shares owned by Ventas (including shares underlying the Warrant) would be more than 9.6% of the total combined voting power of all the Company’s classes of capital stock or of the total value of shares of all the Company’s classes of capital stock (the "Ownership Cap") (other than as a result of actions taken by Ventas), the Company would generally be required to repurchase the number of shares necessary to avoid Ventas exceeding the Ownership Cap unless Ventas makes an election to require the Company to pay Ventas cash in lieu of issuing shares pursuant to the Warrant in excess of the Ownership Cap. The Warrant and the shares issuable upon exercise thereof have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and were issued in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof. On the Effective Date, the parties entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which Ventas and its permitted transferees are entitled to certain registration rights. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant, which was declared effective on August 17, 2020. Ventas is entitled to customary underwritten offering, piggyback, and additional demand registration rights with respect to the shares underlying the Warrant.

As a result of the modification of the community leases with Ventas, the Company reduced the carrying amount of lease obligations and assets under leases by $370.0 million and $159.5 million, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2020. As the Company's community leases do not contain an implicit rate, the Company utilized its incremental borrowing rate based on information available on the Effective Date to determine the present value of remaining lease payments for the community leases with Ventas. Additionally, the results and financial position of the 5 communities conveyed to Ventas were deconsolidated from the Company's financial statements prospectively as of the Effective Date. As of the Effective Date, the Warrant was recognized as a component of stockholders’ equity at its estimated fair value of $22.9 million. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes the $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with its lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020. See Note 19 for more information regarding the adjustments to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as a result of this transaction.

2019 Healthpeak CCRC Venture and Master Lease Transactions

On October 1, 2019, the Company entered into definitive agreements, including a Master Transactions and Cooperation Agreement (the "MTCA") and an Equity Interest Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), providing for a multi-part transaction with Healthpeak. The parties subsequently amended the agreements to include 1 additional entry fee CCRC community as part of the sale of the Company's interest in its unconsolidated entry fee CCRC venture with Healthpeak (the "CCRC Venture") (rather than removing the community from the CCRC Venture for joint marketing and sale). The components of the multi-part transaction include:

CCRC Venture Transaction. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on January 31, 2020, Healthpeak acquired the Company's 51% ownership interest in the CCRC Venture, which held 14 entry fee CCRCs, for a total purchase price of $289.2 million, net of a $5.9 million post-closing net working capital adjustment paid to Healthpeak during the three months ended June 30, 2020 (representing an aggregate valuation of $1.06 billion less portfolio debt, subject to a
104


net working capital adjustment). The $289.2 million of cash received from Healthpeak is presented within net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company recognized a $369.8 million gain on sale of assets for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the Company derecognized the net equity method liability for the sale of the ownership interest in the CCRC Venture. At the closing, the parties terminated the Company's existing management agreements with the 14 entry fee CCRCs, Healthpeak paid the Company a $100.0 million management agreement termination fee, and the Company transitioned operations of the entry fee CCRCs to a new operator. The Company recognized $100.0 million of management fee revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2020 for the management termination fee. Prior to the January 31, 2020 closing, the parties moved the remaining 2 entry fee CCRCs into a new unconsolidated venture on substantially the same terms as the CCRC Venture to accommodate the sale of such 2 communities. Subsequent to these transactions, the Company will have exited substantially all of its entry fee CCRC operations.

Master Lease Transactions. Pursuant to the MTCA, on January 31, 2020, the parties amended and restated the existing master lease pursuant to which the Company continued to lease 25 communities from Healthpeak, and the Company acquired 18 formerly leased communities from Healthpeak, at which time the 18 communities were removed from the master lease. At the closing, the Company paid $405.5 million to acquire such communities and to reduce its annual rent under the amended and restated master lease. The $405.5 million of cash paid to Healthpeak and $1.7 million of direct acquisition costs are presented within net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company funded the community acquisitions with $192.6 million of non-recourse mortgage financing and the proceeds from the multi-part transaction. In addition, Healthpeak agreed to terminate the lease for 1 leased community and the Company's triple-net lease obligation with respect to such community was terminated during December 2020. As a result of the lease termination, the Company recognized a $2.3 million gain on lease termination during the year ended December 31, 2020 for the amount by which the lease obligations exceeded the net carrying amount of the Company's assets under the operating lease as of the lease termination date. With respect to the continuing 24 communities, the Company's amended and restated master lease: (i) has an initial term to expire on December 31, 2027, subject to 2 extension options at the Company's election for ten years each, which must be exercised with respect to the entire pool of leased communities; (ii) the initial annual base rent for the 24 communities is $41.7 million and is subject to an escalator of 2.4% per annum on April 1st of each year; and (iii) Healthpeak has agreed to make available up to $35.0 million for capital expenditures for a five-year period related to the 24 communities at an initial lease rate of 7.0%. As a result of the community acquisition transaction, the Company recognized a $19.7 million gain on debt extinguishment during the year ended December 31, 2020 and derecognized the $105.1 million carrying amount of financing lease obligations for 8 communities which were previously subject to sale-leaseback transactions in which the Company was deemed to have continuing involvement. During March 2020, the Company obtained $30.0 million of additional non-recourse mortgage financing on the acquired communities.

2018 Welltower Lease and RIDEA Venture Restructuring

On June 27, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into definitive agreements with Welltower. The components of the agreements include:

Lease Terminations. The Company and Welltower agreed to an early termination of the Company's triple-net lease obligations on 37 communities effective June 30, 2018. The communities were part of 2 lease portfolios due to mature in 2020 (10 communities) and 2028 (27 communities). The Company paid Welltower an aggregate lease termination fee of $58.0 million. The Company agreed to manage the foregoing 37 communities on an interim basis until the communities have been transitioned to new managers, and such communities are reported in the Management Services segment during such interim period. The Company recognized a $22.6 million loss on lease termination during the year ended December 31, 2018 for the amount by which the aggregate lease termination fee exceeded the net carrying amount of the Company's assets and liabilities under operating and financing leases as of the lease termination date.

Future Lease Terminations. The parties separately agreed to allow the Company to terminate leases with respect to, and to remove from the remaining Welltower leased portfolio, a number of communities with annual aggregate base rent up to $5.0 million upon Welltower's sale of such communities, and the Company would receive a corresponding 6.25% rent credit on Welltower's disposition proceeds. As of December 31, 2020, no leases have been terminated in accordance with the agreement.

RIDEA Restructuring. The Company sold its 20% equity interest in its existing Welltower RIDEA venture to Welltower, effective June 30, 2018 for net proceeds of $33.5 million (for which the Company recognized a $14.7
105


million gain on sale). The Company agreed to continue to manage the communities in the venture on an interim basis until the communities were transitioned to new managers, and such communities were reported in the Management Services segment during such interim period.

The Company also elected not to renew 2 master leases with Welltower which matured on September 30, 2018 (11 communities). The Company continues to operate 74 communities under triple-net leases with Welltower, and the Company's remaining lease agreements with Welltower contain a change of control standard that allows the Company to engage in certain change of control and other transactions without the need to obtain Welltower's consent, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

2018 Ventas Lease Portfolio Restructuring

On April 26, 2018, the Company entered into several agreements to restructure a portfolio of 128 communities it leased from Ventas as of such date, including a Master Lease and Security Agreement (the "Former Ventas Master Lease"), which was subsequently amended and restated on July 26, 2020 as described above. The Former Ventas Master Lease amended and restated prior leases comprising an aggregate portfolio of 107 communities into the Former Ventas Master Lease, and the Company and Ventas agreed to observe, perform, and enforce separate leases for 21 additional communities as if they had been combined into the Former Ventas Master Lease effective April 26, 2018, to the extent not in conflict with any mortgage debt underlying such communities. The transaction agreements with Ventas further provided that the Former Ventas Master Lease and certain other agreements between the Company and Ventas were subject to cross-default provisions.

The Former Ventas Master Lease had an initial term ending December 31, 2025 and provided the Company with 2 10-year extension options. The transaction agreements provided that if the Company had consummated a change of control transaction on or before December 31, 2025, the initial term of the Former Ventas Master Lease would be extended automatically through December 31, 2029. The Former Ventas Master Lease and separate lease agreements with Ventas, which were guaranteed at the parent level by the Company, provided for total rent in 2018 of $175.0 million for the 128 communities, including the pro-rata portion of an $8.0 million annual rent credit for 2018. The Company received an annual rent credit of $8.0 million in 2019 and an annual rent credit of $7.0 million in 2020 prior to giving effect to the reduction from the agreements on July 26, 2020 as described above. The annual minimum rent was subject to an escalator equal to the lesser of 2.25% or 4 times the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") increase for the prior year (or 0 if there was a CPI decrease).

The Former Ventas Master Lease required the Company to spend (or escrow with Ventas) a minimum of $2,000 per unit per 24-month period commencing with the 24-month period ended December 31, 2019 and thereafter each 24-month period ending December 31 during the lease term, subject to annual increases commensurate with the escalator beginning with the second lease year of the first extension term (if any), and provided that if the Company had consummated a change of control transaction, it would have been required within 36 months to invest (or escrow with Ventas) an aggregate of $30.0 million in the communities for revenue-enhancing capital projects.

Under the definitive agreements with Ventas, the Company, at the parent level, was required to satisfy certain financial covenants (including tangible net worth and leverage ratios) and may have consummated a change of control transaction without the need for consent of Ventas so long as certain objective conditions were satisfied, including the post-transaction guarantor's satisfying certain enhanced minimum tangible net worth and maximum leverage ratio, having minimum levels of operational experience and reputation in the senior living industry, and paying a change of control fee of $25.0 million to Ventas.

Pursuant to the Former Ventas Master Lease, the Company exercised its right to direct Ventas to use its commercially reasonable, diligent efforts to market for sale certain communities. During 2019, 7 communities were sold by Ventas and removed from the Former Ventas Master Lease, and the annual minimum rent was prospectively reduced by $1.7 million. During 2020, 1 community was sold by Ventas and removed from the Former Ventas Master Lease, and the annual minimum rent was prospectively reduced by $0.1 million.

The Company estimated the fair value of each of the elements of the restructuring transactions. The fair value of the future lease payments was based upon historical and forecasted community cash flows and market data, including a management fee rate of 5% of revenue and a market supported lease coverage ratio (Level 3 inputs). The Company recognized a $125.7 million non-cash loss on lease modification during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily for the extensions of the triple-net lease obligations for communities with lease terms that are unfavorable to the Company given market conditions on the amendment date in exchange for modifications to the change of control provisions and financial covenant provisions of the community leases.
106



2017 Healthpeak Multi-Part Transaction

On November 2, 2017, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for a multi-part transaction with Healthpeak. As part of such transaction, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Master Lease and Security Agreement ("Former Healthpeak Master Lease") with Healthpeak effective as of November 1, 2017. The components of the multi-part transaction include:

Master Lease Transactions. The Company and Healthpeak amended and restated triple-net leases covering substantially all of the communities the Company leased from Healthpeak as of November 1, 2017 into the Former Healthpeak Master Lease. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired 2 communities formerly leased for an aggregate purchase price of $35.4 million and leases with respect to 33 communities were terminated, and such communities were removed from the Former Healthpeak Master Lease, which completed the terminations of leases as provided in the Former Healthpeak Master Lease. The Company agreed to manage communities for which leases were terminated on an interim basis until the communities were transitioned to new managers, and such communities are reported in the Management Services segment during such interim period. As of December 31, 2019, the Company continued to lease 43 communities pursuant to the terms of the Former Healthpeak Master Lease, which had the same lease rates and expiration and renewal terms as the applicable prior instruments, except that effective January 1, 2018, the Company received a $2.5 million annual rent reduction for 2 communities. The Former Healthpeak Master Lease also provides that the Company may engage in certain change in control and other transactions without the need to obtain Healthpeak's consent, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

RIDEA Ventures Restructuring. Pursuant to the multi-part transaction agreement, Healthpeak acquired the Company's 10% ownership interest in 1 of the Company's RIDEA ventures with Healthpeak in December 2017 for $32.1 million (for which the Company recognized a $7.2 million gain on sale) and the Company's 10% ownership interest in the remaining RIDEA venture with Healthpeak in March 2018 for $62.3 million (for which the Company recognized a $41.7 million gain on sale). The Company provided management services to 59 communities on behalf of the 2 RIDEA ventures as of November 1, 2017. Pursuant to the multi-part transaction agreement, the Company acquired 1 community for an aggregate purchase price of $32.1 million in January 2018 and 3 communities for an aggregate purchase price of $207.4 million in April 2018 and retained management of 18 of such communities. The amended and restated management agreements for such 18 communities have a term set to expire in 2030, subject to certain early termination rights. In addition, Healthpeak was entitled to sell or transition operations and/or management of 37 of such communities. Management agreements for all 37 such communities were terminated by Healthpeak since November of 2017 (for which the Company recognized a $9.7 million non-cash management contract termination gain).

The Company financed the foregoing community acquisitions with non-recourse mortgage financing and proceeds from the sales of its ownership interest in the unconsolidated ventures. See Note 9 for more information regarding the non-recourse first mortgage financing.

In addition, the Company obtained future annual cash rent reductions and waived management termination fees in the multi-part transaction. As a result of the multi-part transaction, the Company reduced its lease liabilities by $9.7 million for the future annual cash rent reductions and recognized a $9.7 million deferred liability for the consideration received from Healthpeak in advance of the termination of the management agreements for the 37 communities.

As a result of the modification of the remaining lease term for communities subject to leases (under ASC 840), the Company reduced the carrying amount of lease obligations and assets under leases by $145.6 million in 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the results and financial position of the 33 communities for which leases were terminated were deconsolidated from the Company prospectively upon termination of the lease obligations. The Company derecognized the $332.8 million carrying amount of the assets under financing leases and the $378.3 million carrying amount of financing lease obligations for 20 communities which were previously subject to sale-leaseback transactions in which the Company was deemed to have continuing involvement. The Company recognized a sale for these 20 communities and recorded a non-cash gain on sale of assets of $44.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Additionally, the Company recognized a non-cash gain on lease termination of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the derecognition of the net carrying amount of the Company's assets and liabilities under operating and financing leases at the lease termination date.


107


5.       Fair Value Measurements

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts considered by management to reasonably approximate fair value due to their short maturity of 90 days or less.

Marketable Securities

As of December 31, 2020, marketable securities of $172.9 million are stated at fair value based on valuations provided by third-party pricing services and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company's derivative assets include interest rate caps that effectively manage the risk above certain interest rates for a portion of the Company's variable rate debt. The derivative positions are valued using models developed internally by the respective counterparty that use as their basis readily available observable market parameters (such as forward yield curves) and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company considers the credit risk of its counterparties when evaluating the fair value of its derivatives. The following table summarizes the Company's interest rate cap instruments as of December 31, 2020:
(in thousands)
Current notional balance$1,537,559 
Weighted average fixed cap rate4.53 %
Earliest maturity date2021 
Latest maturity date2023 
Estimated asset fair value (included in other assets, net at December 31, 2020)$22 
Estimated asset fair value (included in other assets, net at December 31, 2019)$

Debt

The Company estimates the fair value of its debt using a discounted cash flow analysis based upon the Company's current borrowing rate for debt with similar maturities and collateral securing the indebtedness. The Company had outstanding long-term debt with a carrying amount of approximately $3.9 billion and $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Fair value of the long-term debt approximates carrying amount in all periods presented. The Company's fair value of long-term debt disclosure is classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Warrant

On July 26, 2020, the Company issued to Ventas a warrant to purchase up to 16.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price per share of $3.00. The fair value of this warrant of $22.9 million as of July 26, 2020 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizing a stock price volatility assumption of 65% which is considered a Level 2 input of the valuation hierarchy.

108


Asset Impairment Expense

The following is a summary of asset impairment expense.
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202020192018
Goodwill$$$351.7 
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net29.3 27.2 78.0 
Operating lease right-of-use assets76.3 10.2 
Investment in unconsolidated ventures1.5 33.4 
Assets held for sale0.2 1.3 15.6 
Other assets, net10.6 11.2 
Asset impairment$107.3 $49.3 $489.9 

Although the Company cannot predict with reasonable certainty the ultimate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company concluded that the impacts of the pandemic have adversely affected the Company’s projections of revenue, expense, and cash flow for its senior housing community long-lived assets and constitute an indicator of potential impairment. Accordingly, the Company assessed its long-lived assets for recoverability. Refer to Note 3 for additional information on the COVID-19 pandemic.

In estimating the recoverability of asset groups for purposes of the Company’s long-lived asset impairment testing during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company utilized future cash flow projections that are developed internally. Any estimates of future cash flow projections necessarily involve predicting unknown future circumstances and events and require significant management judgments and estimates. In arriving at the cash flow projections, the Company considers its estimates of the impacts of the pandemic, historic operating results, approved budgets and business plans, future demographic factors, expected growth rates, estimated asset holding periods, and other factors.

As of December 31, 2020 there was a wide range of possible outcomes as a result of the pandemic, as there was a high degree of uncertainty about its ultimate impact. Management’s estimates of the impact of the pandemic are highly dependent on variables that are difficult to predict, as further described in Note 3. Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments.

Goodwill    

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company identified qualitative indicators of impairment of goodwill, including a significant decline in the Company's stock price and market capitalization for a sustained period during the three months ended March 31, 2018. As a result, the Company performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2018, which included a comparison of the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit's carrying amount.

In estimating the fair value of the reporting units for purposes of the quantitative goodwill impairment test, the Company utilized an income approach, which included future cash flow projections that are developed internally. Any estimates of future cash flow projections necessarily involve predicting unknown future circumstances and events and require significant management judgments and estimates. In arriving at the cash flow projections, the Company considered its historic operating results, approved budgets and business plans, future demographic factors, expected growth rates, and other factors. In using the income approach to estimate the fair value of reporting units for purposes of its goodwill impairment test, the Company made certain key assumptions. Those assumptions include future revenues, facility operating expenses, and cash flows, including sales proceeds that the Company would receive upon a sale of the communities using estimated capitalization rates, all of which are considered Level 3 inputs in the valuation hierarchy. The Company corroborated the estimated capitalization rates used in these calculations with capitalization rates observable from recent market transactions. Future cash flows are discounted at a rate that is consistent with a weighted average cost of capital from a market participant perspective. The weighted average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by equity and debt holders of a business enterprise. The Company also considered market based measures such as earnings multiples in its analysis of estimated fair values of its reporting units.

Based on the results of the Company's quantitative goodwill impairment test, the Company determined that the carrying amount of the Company's Assisted Living and Memory Care reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value by more than the $351.7
109


million carrying amount as of March 31, 2018. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $351.7 million to goodwill within the Assisted Living and Memory Care segment for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

During 2020, the Company identified indicators of impairment of goodwill, including the COVID-19 pandemic and a significant decline in the Company's stock price and market capitalization for a sustained period. Refer to Note 3 for additional information on the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the Company performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2020. The Company’s quantitative goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2020 included reduced estimates of projected future cash flows as a result of changes to significant assumptions using information known or knowable about the COVID-19 pandemic, including current industry and economic trends, changes in business plans, and changes in expected revenue and facility operating expense growth rates. Additionally, the Company considered the additional risk within the future cash flow estimates when selecting risk-adjusted discount rates. As of December 31, 2020, the Company also considered that the estimated Health Care Services reporting unit fair value, based upon the transaction price for the Health Care Services segment as described in Note 21, exceeds its carrying amount.

The Company concluded that the remaining goodwill for all reporting units was not impaired as of October 1, 2020 and 2019 (the Company's annual measurement date) and as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. Goodwill allocated to the Company's Independent Living and Health Care Services reporting units is approximately $27.3 million and $126.8 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Determining the fair value of the Company's reporting units involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. These estimates and assumptions include revenue and expense growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates. Future events may indicate differences from management's current judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in future impairments. Future events that may result in impairment charges include differences in the projected occupancy rates or monthly service fee rates, changes in the cost structure of existing communities, changes in reimbursement rates from Medicare for healthcare services, and changes in healthcare reform. Significant adverse changes in the Company's future revenues and/or operating margins, significant changes in the market for healthcare services, senior housing or the valuation of the real estate of senior living communities, as well as other events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, increased competition, changes in reimbursement rates from Medicare for healthcare services, and changing economic or market conditions, including market control premiums, could result in changes in fair value and the determination that additional goodwill is impaired.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Leasehold Intangibles, Net

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company evaluated property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles for impairment and identified properties with a carrying amount of the assets in excess of the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. The Company compared the estimated fair value of the assets to their carrying amount for these identified properties and recorded an impairment charge for the excess of carrying amount over fair value. The Company recorded property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles non-cash impairment charges in its operating results of $29.3 million, $27.2 million, and $78.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The fair values of the assets of these communities were primarily determined utilizing a discounted cash flow approach or direct capitalization method considering stabilized facility operating income and market capitalization rates. These fair value measurements are considered Level 3 measurements within the valuation hierarchy. The range of capitalization rates utilized was 6.5% to 9.0%, depending upon the property type, geographical location, and the quality of the respective community. The Company corroborated the estimated fair values with a sales comparison approach with information observable from recent market transactions. These impairment charges are primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic, lower than expected operating performance at these properties, or the Company's decision to dispose of assets and reflect the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceeded their estimated fair value.

Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company evaluated operating lease right-of-use assets for impairment and identified communities with a carrying amount of the assets in excess of the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. The Company compared the estimated fair value of the assets to their carrying amount for these identified communities and recorded an impairment charge for the excess of carrying amount over fair value. The Company recognized the right-of-use assets for the operating leases for 35 communities on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2020 at the estimated fair value of $106.7 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized the right-of-use assets for the operating leases for 9 communities on the consolidated balance sheet at the estimated fair value of $10.3 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company recognized the right-of-use assets for the operating leases for 2 communities on the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2020 at
110


the estimated fair value of $3.0 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized the right-of-use assets for the operating leases for 5 communities on the consolidated balance sheet at the estimated fair value of $2.3 million. In the aggregate, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $76.3 million and $10.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, to operating lease right-of-use assets. These 2020 impairment charges are primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the lower than expected operating performance at these communities and reflect the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceeded their estimated fair value.

The Company's adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of the right-of-use assets for the operating leases for 25 communities to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 at the estimated fair value of $56.6 million, and $58.1 million of previously unrecognized right-of-use asset impairments were recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit as the Company determined that the long-lived assets of such communities were not recoverable as of such date. See Note 2 for more information regarding the recognition of right-of-use assets for operating leases upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02.

The fair values of the operating lease right-of-use assets were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow approach based upon projected community cash flows and market data, including management fees and a market supported lease coverage ratio, all of which are considered Level 3 inputs within the valuation hierarchy. The estimated future cash flows were discounted at a rate that is consistent with a weighted average cost of capital from a market participant perspective. The range of discount rates utilized was 9.0% to 12.3%, depending upon the property type, geographical location, and the quality of the respective community.

Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures

The Company evaluates realization of its investment in ventures accounted for using the equity method if circumstances indicate that the Company's investment is other than temporarily impaired. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018 the Company recorded $1.5 million and $33.4 million, respectively, of non-cash impairment charges for investments in unconsolidated ventures. These impairment charges are primarily due to lower than expected operating performance at the communities owned by the unconsolidated ventures and reflect the amount by which the carrying amounts of the investments exceeded their estimated fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not record impairment expense for its investment in unconsolidated ventures.

Assets Held for Sale

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized $0.2 million, $1.3 million, and $15.6 million, respectively, of impairment charges for assets held for sale. These impairment charges are primarily due to the excess of carrying amount over the estimated selling price less costs to dispose. The Company determines the fair value of the communities based primarily on purchase and sale agreements from prospective purchasers (Level 2 input). Refer to Note 4 for more information about the Company's community dispositions and assets held for sale.

Other Assets

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company identified indicators of impairment for the Company's home health care licenses, primarily due to significant underperformance relative to historical and projected operating results, the impact of lower reimbursement rates from Medicare for home health care services, and an increased competitive environment in the home health care industry. The Company performed a quantitative impairment test, which included a comparison of the estimated fair value of the Company's home health care licenses to the carrying amount. In estimating the fair value of the home health licenses for purposes of the quantitative impairment test, the Company utilized an income approach, which included future cash flow projections that are developed internally. Any estimates of future cash flow projections necessarily involve predicting unknown future circumstances and events and require significant management judgments and estimates. In arriving at the cash flow projections, the Company considered its historic operating results, approved budgets and business plans, future demographic factors, expected growth rates, and other factors, all of which are considered Level 3 inputs in the valuation hierarchy. Based on the results of the Company's quantitative impairment test, the Company determined that the carrying amount of certain of the Company's home health care licenses exceeded their estimated fair value. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $7.6 million and $9.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, to intangible assets within the Health Care Services segment.



111


6.       Revenue

Disaggregation of Revenue

The Company disaggregates its revenue from contracts with customers by payor source as the Company believes it best depicts how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Resident fee revenue by payor source and reportable segment is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Independent LivingAssisted Living and Memory CareCCRCsHealth Care ServicesTotal
Private pay$510,254 $1,622,117 $235,018 $906 $2,368,295 
Government reimbursement2,344 69,159 59,614 287,512 418,629 
Other third-party payor programs27,251 78,392 105,643 
Total resident fee revenue$512,598 $1,691,276 $321,883 $366,810 $2,892,567 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Independent LivingAssisted Living and Memory CareCCRCsHealth Care ServicesTotal
Private pay$542,112 $1,748,364 $281,197 $753 $2,572,426 
Government reimbursement2,446 67,574 81,054 357,963 509,037 
Other third-party payor programs39,924 88,544 128,468 
Total resident fee revenue$544,558 $1,815,938 $402,175 $447,260 $3,209,931 
Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Independent LivingAssisted Living and Memory CareCCRCsHealth Care ServicesTotal
Private pay$596,852 $1,923,676 $288,682 $693 $2,809,903 
Government reimbursement3,125 72,175 87,028 359,881 522,209 
Other third-party payor programs40,698 76,401 117,099 
Total resident fee revenue$599,977 $1,995,851 $416,408 $436,975 $3,449,211 

Contract Balances

The payment terms and conditions within the Company's revenue-generating contracts vary by contract type and payor source, although terms generally include payment to be made within 30 days.

Resident fee revenue for recurring and routine monthly services is generally billed monthly in advance under the Company's independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements. Resident fee revenue for standalone or certain healthcare services is generally billed monthly in arrears. A portion of the Company's reimbursement from Medicare for certain healthcare services is billed near the start of each period of care, and cash is generally received before all services are rendered. The amount of revenue recognized for periods of care which are incomplete at period end is based on the Company's historical average percentage of days complete on each period of care and any unearned amounts are deferred and recognized when the service is performed. Additionally, non-refundable community fees are generally billed and collected in advance or upon move-in of a resident under the Company's independent living, assisted living, and memory care residency agreements. Amounts of revenue that are collected from residents in advance are recognized as deferred revenue until the performance obligations are satisfied. The Company had total deferred revenue (included within refundable fees and deferred revenue and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets) of $138.3 million and $72.5 million, including $21.1 million and $38.9 million of monthly resident fees billed and received in advance, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Such amount of total deferred revenue as of December 31, 2020 also includes $87.5 million received during the year ended December 31, 2020 under a temporary expansion of the Accelerated and Advance Payment Program administered by CMS. Refer to Note 3 for additional information on such program. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 the Company recognized $60.6 million, $94.6 million, and $82.1 million respectively, of revenue that was included in the deferred revenue balance as of January 1,
112


2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Company applies the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14 and does not disclose amounts for remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less.

The following table presents the changes in allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable for the periods indicated:

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202020192018
Balance at beginning of period$7.8 $7.9 $9.8 
Provision within facility operating expense16.7 15.2 17.6 
Write-offs(16.2)(19.5)(22.3)
Recoveries and other1.5 4.2 2.8 
Balance at end of period$9.8 $7.8 $7.9 



7.       Property, Plant and Equipment and Leasehold Intangibles, Net

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, net property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, which include assets under financing leases, consisted of the following:
As of December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Land$505,298 $450,894 
Buildings and improvements5,215,460 4,790,769 
Furniture and equipment945,783 859,849 
Resident and leasehold operating intangibles307,071 317,111 
Construction in progress61,491 80,729 
Assets under financing leases and leasehold improvements1,523,055 1,847,493 
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles8,558,158 8,346,845 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,490,098)(3,237,011)
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net$5,068,060 $5,109,834 

Assets under financing leases and leasehold improvements includes $0.4 billion and $0.6 billion of financing lease right-of-use assets, net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Refer to Note 10 for further information on the Company's financing leases.

Long-lived assets with definite useful lives are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (or, in certain cases, the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term) and are tested for impairment whenever indicators of impairment arise. Refer to Note 5 for information on impairment expense for property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles.

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized depreciation and amortization expense on its property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles of $359.2 million, $377.6 million, and $444.3 million, respectively.

113


8.       Goodwill

The following is a summary of the carrying amount of goodwill presented on a reportable segment basis as of both December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(in thousands)Gross Carrying AmountDispositions and Other ReductionsAccumulated ImpairmentNet
Independent Living$28,141 $(820)$$27,321 
Assisted Living and Memory Care605,469 (48,817)(556,652)
Health Care Services126,810 126,810 
Total$760,420 $(49,637)$(556,652)$154,131 

Refer to Note 5 for information on impairment expense for goodwill in 2018.

9.       Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Fixed mortgage notes payable due 2021 through 2047; weighted average interest rate of 4.18% and 4.80% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.$2,366,996 $2,270,811 
Variable mortgage notes payable due 2022 through 2030, weighted average interest rate of 2.49% and 4.10% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.1,529,935 1,242,921 
Other notes payable due 2021 to 2025; weighted average interest rate of 8.98% and 5.77% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.46,557 58,388 
Debt discount and deferred financing costs, net(27,500)(16,997)
Total long-term debt3,915,988 3,555,123 
Current portion68,885 339,413 
Total long-term debt, less current portion$3,847,103 $3,215,710 

As of December 31, 2020, 98.2%, or $3.8 billion of the Company's total debt obligations represented non-recourse property-level mortgage financings.

The annual aggregate scheduled maturities of long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):


Year Ending December 31,
Long-term
Debt
Weighted Rate
2021$73,673 4.26 %
2022352,366 3.57 %
2023234,448 3.51 %
2024304,239 4.29 %
2025292,972 3.99 %
Thereafter2,685,790 3.45 %
Total obligations3,943,488 3.59 %
Less amount representing debt discount and deferred financing costs, net(27,500)
Total$3,915,988 

114


Credit Facilities

On August 31, 2020, the Company terminated its Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent, lender, and swingline lender and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (as amended, the ("Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement had a maturity date of January 3, 2024. Amounts drawn under the facility bore interest at 90-day LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin varied based on the percentage of the total commitment drawn, with a 2.25% margin at utilization equal to or lower than 35%, a 2.75% margin at utilization greater than 35% but less than or equal to 50%, and a 3.25% margin at utilization greater than 50%. The Credit Agreement had provided commitments for a $250.0 million revolving credit facility with a $60.0 million sublimit for letters of credit and a $50.0 million swingline feature. The credit facility was secured by first priority mortgages on certain of the Company's communities, and availability varied from time to time based on borrowing base calculations related to the appraised value and performance of the communities securing the credit facility and the Company's consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement was terminated in connection with the Company obtaining approximately $266.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing on 16 communities on August 31, 2020, most of which had secured the Credit Agreement prior to its termination. At the closing, the Company repaid the $166.4 million outstanding principal amount under the Credit Agreement, together with accumulated interest, and without payment of any termination fee or penalty.

On December 11, 2020, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement with Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent and lender and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto. The agreement provides a commitment amount of $80 million which can be drawn in cash or as letters of credit. The agreement matures on January 15, 2024. Amounts drawn under the facility will bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus an applicable margin which was 2.75% as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, a quarterly commitment fee of 0.25% per annum was applicable on the unused portion of the facility as of December 31, 2020. The revolving credit facility is currently secured by first priority mortgages and negative pledges on certain of the Company’s communities. Available capacity under the facility will vary from time to time based upon borrowing base calculations related to the appraised value and performance of the communities securing the credit facility.

As of December 31, 2020, 0 borrowings were outstanding on the revolving credit facility, $40.4 million of letters of credit were outstanding, and the revolving credit facility had $22.2 million of availability. The Company also had separate secured and unsecured letter of credit facilities of up to $51.6 million of letters of credit as of December 31, 2020 under which $40.3 million had been issued as of that date.

2020 Financings

On January 31, 2020, the Company obtained $238.2 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 14 communities, including $192.6 million of non-recourse first mortgage financing on 13 communities acquired from Healthpeak on such date. NaN percent of the principal amount bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.62%, and the remaining 30 percent of the principal amount bears interest at a variable rate equal to 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 209 basis points. The debt matures in February 2030. The proceeds from the financing were utilized to fund the acquisition of communities from Healthpeak and repay $33.1 million of outstanding mortgage debt maturing in 2020. Refer to Note 4 for more information about the Company's acquisition of communities from Healthpeak.

On March 19, 2020, the Company obtained $29.2 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 7 communities, primarily communities acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2020. The loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 225 basis points and matures in April 2030.

On March 20, 2020, the Company obtained $30.0 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgage on 1 community acquired from Healthpeak on January 31, 2020. The loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 250 basis points and matures in March 2022.

On March 31, 2020, the Company obtained $149.3 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 18 communities. Of the total principal, $73.1 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.55%, and the remaining $76.2 million bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 210 basis points. The debt matures in April 2030. The $149.3 million of proceeds from the financing were primarily utilized to repay $136.3 million of outstanding mortgage debt maturing in 2020.

On August 31, 2020, the Company obtained $266.9 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 16 communities, most of which secured the credit facility prior to its termination. Of the total principal, $191.3 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.89%, and the remaining $75.6 million bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 249 basis points. The debt matures in September 2030. The $266.9 million of proceeds from the financing
115


were primarily utilized to repay the outstanding principal amount under the Credit Agreement and to cash collateralize letters of credit.

On September 9, 2020, the Company obtained $220.5 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 27 communities. Of the total principal, $156.5 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.18%, and the remaining $64.0 million bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 254 basis points. The debt matures in October 2030. The $220.5 million of proceeds from the financing were primarily utilized to repay outstanding mortgage debt maturing in 2020 and 2021.

2019 Financings

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company obtained $111.1 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 14 communities. NaN percent of the principal amount bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.52%, and the remaining 40 percent of the principal amount bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 223 basis points. The debt matures in June 2029. The $111.1 million of proceeds from the financing along with cash on hand were utilized to repay $155.5 million of outstanding mortgage debt maturing in 2019.

During the third quarter of 2019, the Company obtained $160.3 million of debt secured by the non-recourse first mortgages on 5 communities. NaN percent of the principal amount bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.35%, and the remaining NaN percent of the principal amount bears interest at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus a margin of 217 basis points. The debt matures in September 2029. The $160.3 million of proceeds from the financing were utilized to repay $139.2 million of outstanding mortgage debt maturing in 2020 and 2023.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $5.2 million of debt modification and extinguishment costs on the consolidated statement of operations, primarily related to third party fees directly related to debt modifications.

Financial Covenants

Certain of the Company's debt documents contain restrictions and financial covenants, such as those requiring the Company to maintain prescribed minimum liquidity, net worth, and stockholders' equity levels and debt service ratios, and requiring the Company not to exceed prescribed leverage ratios, in each case on a consolidated, portfolio-wide, multi-community, single-community, and/or entity basis. In addition, the Company's debt documents generally contain non-financial covenants, such as those requiring the Company to comply with Medicare or Medicaid provider requirements and maintain insurance coverage.

The Company's failure to comply with applicable covenants could constitute an event of default under the applicable debt documents. Many of the Company's debt documents contain cross-default provisions so that a default under one of these instruments could cause a default under other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders and lessors). Furthermore, the Company's debt is secured by its communities and, in certain cases, a guaranty by the Company and/or one or more of its subsidiaries.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants of its debt agreements.

10.       Leases

As of December 31, 2020, the Company operated 301 communities under long-term leases (235 operating leases and 66 financing leases). The substantial majority of the Company's lease arrangements are structured as master leases. Under a master lease, numerous communities are leased through an indivisible lease. The Company typically guarantees the performance and lease payment obligations of its subsidiary lessees under the master leases. An event of default related to an individual property or limited number of properties within a master lease portfolio may result in a default on the entire master lease portfolio.

The leases relating to these communities are generally fixed rate leases with annual escalators that are either fixed or based upon changes in the consumer price index or the leased property revenue. The Company is responsible for all operating costs, including repairs, property taxes, and insurance. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term of the Company's operating and financing leases was 6.7 and 6.3 years, respectively. The leases generally provide for renewal or extension options from 5 to 20 years and in some instances, purchase options. For accounting purposes, renewal or extension options are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option. Generally, renewal or extension options are not included in the lease term for accounting purposes.

116


The community leases contain other customary terms, which may include assignment and change of control restrictions, maintenance and capital expenditure obligations, termination provisions, and financial covenants, such as those requiring the Company to maintain prescribed minimum liquidity, net worth, and stockholders' equity levels and lease coverage ratios, in each case on a consolidated, portfolio-wide, multi-community, single-community and/or entity basis. In addition, the Company's lease documents generally contain non-financial covenants, such as those requiring the Company to comply with Medicare or Medicaid provider requirements and maintain insurance coverage.

The Company's failure to comply with applicable covenants could constitute an event of default under the applicable lease documents. Many of the Company's debt and lease documents contain cross-default provisions so that a default under one of these instruments could cause a default under other debt and lease documents (including documents with other lenders and lessors). Certain leases contain cure provisions, which generally allow the Company to post an additional lease security deposit if the required covenant is not met. Furthermore, the Company's leases are secured by its communities and, in certain cases, a guaranty by the Company and/or one or more of its subsidiaries.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants of its long-term leases.

A summary of operating and financing lease expense (including the respective presentation on the consolidated statements of operations) and net cash paid from leasing transactions is as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Leases (in thousands)
20202019
Facility operating expense$19,241 $18,677 
Facility lease expense224,033 269,666 
Operating lease expense243,274 288,343 
Operating lease expense adjustment (1)
136,276 19,453 
Changes in operating lease assets and liabilities for lessor capital expenditure reimbursements(22,242)(31,305)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$357,308 $276,491 

(1) Represents the difference between the amount of cash operating lease payments and the amount of operating lease expense recognized in accordance with ASC 842. Operating cash flows from operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes the $119.2 million one-time cash lease payment made to Ventas in connection with the Company's lease restructuring transaction effective July 26, 2020.
Years Ended December 31,
Financing Leases (in thousands)
20202019
Depreciation and amortization$32,647 $46,646 
Interest expense: financing lease obligations48,534 66,353 
Financing lease expense$81,181 $112,999 
Operating cash flows from financing leases$48,534 $66,353 
Financing cash flows from financing leases18,867 22,242 
Changes in financing lease assets and liabilities for lessor capital expenditure reimbursement(5,603)(3,504)
Total cash flows from financing leases$61,798 $85,091 

A summary of facility lease expense and the impact of operating lease expense adjustment, under ASC 840, and deferred gains are as follows:

Jordan R. Asher, MD, MA

Class II Independent Director

Director Since: February 2020

Age:55

Dr. Asher brings more than 20 years of expertise and a history of success in large matrixed, mission-based, national healthcare systems. Since 2018, he has served as the Chief Physician Executive and Senior Vice President of Sentara Healthcare, a large integrated delivery health system including a clinically integrated network and insurance company serving Virginia and North Carolina, where he has a wide range of responsibilities, including a focus on growth strategies for clinical care and development and implementation of value-based care and payment models. Prior to Sentara, Dr. Asher served in several executive roles with Ascension since 2006, including Chief Clinical Officer of its Ascension Care Management subsidiary from 2016 to 2018 with responsibility for network development and population and risk management, Chief Clinical Officer and Chief Innovation Officer of Ascension’s MissionPoint Health Partners subsidiary from 2015 to 2016, and Chief Medical Officer and Chief Integration Officer of MissionPoint Health Partners from 2011 to 2015. Dr. Asher earned a B.S. in Biology from Emory University, an M.D. from Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and an M.S. in Medical Management from the University of Texas at Dallas and Southwestern Medical Center.

Dr. Asher’s deep experience in the evolving healthcare landscape, including a combination of clinical training and executive leadership experience, particularly in light of the healthcare industry’s transition to more integrated, value-based delivery and payment models as we continue to grow and integrate our healthcare services business, led to the conclusion that he should serve as a member of the Board.

4        


Marcus E. Bromley

Class III Independent Director

Director Since:July 2017

Age:70

Brookdale Board Committees:

• Audit

• Investment

Public Company Directorships:

•  Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc.
(2015 – current)

•  Cole Corporate Income Trust, Inc.
(2011 – 2015)

•  Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.
(2005 – 2013)

•  Cole Credit Property Trust III, Inc.
(2008 – 2012)

•  Gables Residential Trust
(1993 – 2005)

Mr. Bromley brings more than 35 years of real estate industry leadership experience. He served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Gables Residential Trust from 1993 until 2000, and then as a member of its Board until the company was acquired in 2005. Prior to joining Gables Residential Trust, Mr. Bromley was a division partner for the Southeast operation of Trammell Crow Residential Company. Mr. Bromley has served as a member of the Board of Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc., anon-listed real estate investment trust, since March 2015 and served as itsNon-Executive Chairman from June 2015 to August 2018. Mr. Bromley also currently serves as a member of the advisory board of Nancy Creek Capital Management, LLC, a private mezzanine debt and equity investment firm, and Sealy Industrial Partners, a private partnership specializing in the acquisition and operation of various industrial real estate properties. Mr. Bromley holds a B.S. in Economics from Washington & Lee University and an M.B.A. from the University of North Carolina.

Mr. Bromley’s significant executive, leadership, and advisory experience in the real estate industry led to the conclusion that he should serve as a member of the Board.

thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2018

Frank M. Bumstead

Class I Independent Director

Director Since:August 2006

Age:78

Brookdale Board Committees:

• Compensation (Chair)

• Nominating & Corporate Governance

Public Company Directorships:

•  Syntroleum Corporation
(1993 – 2014)

•  American Retirement Corp.
(1997 – 2006)

Mr. Bumstead has over 40 years’ experience in the field of business and investment management and financial and investment advisory services, including representing buyers and sellers in a number of merger and acquisition transactions. Mr. Bumstead is a principal shareholder of Flood, Bumstead, McCready & McCarthy, Inc., a business management firm that represents artists, songwriters and producers in the music industry as well as athletes and other high net worth clients, and has been with the firm since 1989. From 1993 to December 1998, Mr. Bumstead served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FBMS Financial, Inc., a registered investment advisor. He served in 2015 as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Country Music Association and is also Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Finance and Investment Committee of the Memorial Foundation, Inc., a charitable foundation. In addition, he previously served as a member of the Board of Advisors of United Supermarkets of Texas, LLC and was Chairman of its Finance and Audit Committee. Mr. Bumstead received a B.B.A. degree from Southern Methodist University and a Masters of Business Management from Vanderbilt University’s Owen School of Management.

Mr. Bumstead’s experience in business management and as a director of several public companies, along with his knowledge of the senior housing industry (through his prior service as a director of ARC), led to the conclusion that he should serve as a member of the Board.

        5


Cash basis payment - operating leases$324,870 

Victoria L. Freed

Class II Independent Director

Director Since:October 2019

Age:63

Brookdale Board Committees:

•  Compensation

•  Nominating & Corporate Governance

Public Company Directorships:

•  ILG, Inc. (f/k/a Interval Leisure
Group, Inc.)
(2012 – 2018)

Ms. Freed brings more than 25 years of executive leadership in the areas of sales, customer service, and marketing, and has earned numerous awards for outstanding achievement in sales and marketing during her career. Ms. Freed is Senior Vice President of Sales, Trade Support and Service for Royal Caribbean International, having served in that role since 2008, where she oversees the largest sales team in the cruise line industry and also manages the company’s consumer outreach, reservations, group sales, and customer service functions. Prior to her service with Royal Caribbean, Ms. Freed worked for 29 years with Carnival Cruise Lines, where she served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing during the last 15 years of her tenure. Ms. Freed served on the Board of Directors of ILG, Inc. (f/k/a Interval Leisure Group, Inc.) from 2012 until its acquisition by Marriott Vacations Worldwide in 2018. She is a trustee of the United Way of Miami-Dade County and serves as a member of the board of Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options (JAFCO). Ms. Freed earned a bachelor’s degree in business with an emphasis in marketing from the University of Colorado.

Ms. Freed’s decades of executive leadership in sales, customer service and marketing in the hospitality industry led to the conclusion that she should serve as a member of the Board.

Operating lease expense adjustment(17,218)

Rita Johnson-Mills

Class III Independent Director

Director Since:August 2018

Age:61

Brookdale Board Committees:

•  Nominating & Corporate
Governance (Chair)

•  Investment

Ms. Johnson-Mills is an experienced healthcare executive, with more than 20 yearsAmortization of experience in the broader healthcare industry, including experience in the public sector. She is founder and CEO of consulting firm RJM Enterprises. Ms. Johnson-Mills most recently served from August 2014 to December 2017 as President and Chief Executive Officer of UnitedHealthcare Community Plan of Tennessee, a health plan serving more than 500,000 government sponsored healthcare consumers with over $2.5 billion of annual revenue, after having previously served as Senior Vice President, Performance Excellence and Accountability for UnitedHealthcare Community & State since 2006. Ms. Johnson-Mills also previously served as the Director of Medicaid Managed Care for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and as Chief Executive Officer of Managed Health Services Indiana and Buckeye Health Plan, wholly owned subsidiaries of Centene Corporation. Ms. Johnson-Mills earned a B.S. degree from Lincoln University and an M.A. degree in Labor and Human Resource Management and M.P.A. degree in Public Policy and Management from The Ohio State University.

Ms. Johnson-Mills’ experience as an executive in the healthcare space, including her expertise in healthcare operations and strategy, led to the conclusion that she should serve as a member of the Board.

6        


deferred gain(4,358)

Denise W. Warren

Class III Independent Director

Director Since:October 2018

Age:58

Brookdale Board Committees:

• Audit (Chair)

• Compensation

Public Company Directorships:

• Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.
(2017 – current)

Ms. Warren brings more than 30 years of operational, financial, and healthcare experience. Since October 2015, she has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of WakeMed Health & Hospitals, where she is responsible for the strategic, financial and operational performance of the organization’s network of facilities in the North Carolina Research Triangle area. Prior to that, from 2005 to September 2015, Ms. Warren served as Chief Financial Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc., an owner and operator of general acute-care hospitals, as well as its Executive Vice President since January 2014, and as its Senior Vice President prior to that. Before joining Capella, she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gaylord Entertainment Company from 2000 to 2001, as Senior Equity Analyst and Research Director for Avondale Partners LLC, and as Senior Equity Analyst for Merrill Lynch & Co. Ms. Warren earned a B.S. degree in Economics from Southern Methodist University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University.

Ms. Warren’s extensive executive, financial, and operational experience in the healthcare and other industries led to the conclusion that she should serve as a member of the Board.

Facility lease expense$303,294 

Lee S. Wielansky

Class I Independent Director

Director Since:April 2015

Age:68

Brookdale Board Committees:

• Audit

• Investment (Chair)

Public Company Directorships:

• Acadia Realty Trust
(2000 – current)

• Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.
(2007 – 2017)

• Pulaski Financial Corp.
(2005 – 2016)

Mr. Wielansky has more than 40 years of commercial real estate investment, management, and development experience. He currently serves as Chairman and CEO of Opportunistic Equities, which specializes in low income housing. He has also served as Chairman and CEO of Midland Development Group, Inc., which here-started in 2003 and focused on the development of retail properties in the midwest and southeast. Prior

117



As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average discount rate of the Company's operating and financing leases was 7.2% and 8.0%, respectively.

The aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments, including community, office, and equipment leases, recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,Operating LeasesFinancing Leases
2021$209,787 $64,914 
2022192,771 65,521 
2023192,381 66,250 
2024191,991 67,460 
2025189,961 57,499 
Thereafter280,233 109,590 
Total lease payments1,257,124 431,234 
Purchase option liability and non-cash gain on future sale of property413,426 
Imputed interest and variable lease payments(291,469)(281,353)
Total lease obligations$965,655 $563,307 

11.      Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

Accrued expenses reflected within current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets consist of the following:
As of December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Salaries and wages$65,310 $86,476 
Insurance reserves64,633 63,230 
Paid time off37,848 37,415 
Deferred payroll taxes (Note 3)36,336 
Real estate taxes25,495 25,979 
Interest11,453 16,196 
Accrued utilities7,507 7,601 
Taxes payable3,806 1,360 
Other35,463 28,446 
Total$287,851 $266,703 

Other assets, net reflected on the Company's consolidated balance sheets consist of the following:

As of December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Health care licenses(1)
$34,060 $35,198 
Lease security deposit3,180 49,102 
Other19,019 34,431 
Total$56,259 $118,731 

(1) Health care licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets and are not subject to amortization.

118


Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures

As of December 31, 2019, the Company held a 51% equity interest, and Healthpeak owned a 49% interest, in the CCRC Venture, which owned and operated 16 entry fee CCRCs. The Company's ownership interests in the CCRC Venture were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 4 for information on the Company's sale of the equity interest in the CCRC Venture on January 31, 2020 and movement of the remaining 2 entry fee CCRCs into a new unconsolidated venture. As a result of the recognition of the Company’s investment basis at the carrying amounts of the net assets contributed upon formation of the CCRC Venture and subsequent cash distributions, the Company's carrying amount of its equity method investment in the CCRC Venture property company was reduced below zero and the Company had recorded a $66.2 million equity method liability within other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet included a $10.1 million equity method liability for the new unconsolidated venture which owns the remaining 2 entry fee CCRCs.

12.       Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company has been and is currently involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of its business, which it believes are generally comparable to other companies in the senior living and healthcare industries, including, but not limited to, putative class action claims from time to time regarding staffing at the Company’s communities and compliance with consumer protection laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Certain claims and lawsuits allege large damage amounts and may require significant costs to defend and resolve. As a result, the Company maintains general liability, professional liability, and other insurance policies in amounts and with coverage and deductibles the Company believes are appropriate, based on the nature and risks of its business, historical experience, availability, and industry standards. The Company's current policies provide for deductibles for each claim and contain various exclusions from coverage. Accordingly, the Company is, in effect, self-insured for claims that are less than the deductible amounts and for claims or portions of claims that are not covered by such policies and/or exceed the policy limits.

Similarly, the senior living and healthcare industries are continuously subject to scrutiny by governmental regulators, which could result in reviews, audits, investigations, enforcement activities or litigation related to regulatory compliance matters. In addition, as a result of the Company's participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, the Company is subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations, including but not limited to audits under various government programs, such as the Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC), Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC), and Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPIC) programs. The costs to respond to and defend such reviews, audits, and investigations may be significant, and an adverse determination could result in citations, sanctions and other criminal or civil fines and penalties, the refund of overpayments, payment suspensions, termination of participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs, and/or damage to the Company's business reputation.

In June 2020, the Company and several current and former executive officers were named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit alleging violations of the federal securities laws filed in the federal court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The lawsuit asserts that the defendants made material misstatements and omissions concerning the Company's business, operational and compliance policies that caused the Company's stock price to be artificially inflated between August 2016 and April 2020. While the Company cannot predict with certainty the result of this or any other legal proceedings, the Company believes the allegations in the suit are without merit and does not expect this matter to Midland, he served as President and CEO of JDN Development Company, Inc. and as a director of JDN Realty Corporation. Before joining JDN, he served as Managing Director–Investments of Regency Centers Corporation, which in 1998 acquired Midland Development Group, a retail properties development companyco-founded by Mr. Wielansky in 1983. Mr. Wielansky served as Brookdale’sNon-Executive Chairman of the Board from February 2018 through December 2019. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration, with a major in Real Estate and Finance, from the University of Missouri–Columbia, where he is currently a member of the Strategic Development Board of the College of Business. He also serves on the Board of Directors of The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

Mr. Wielansky’s real estate investment, management, and development experience, as well as his service as a director of several public companies, led to the conclusion that he should serve as a member of the Board.

        7


Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee establishedmaterial adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. In October 2020, an alleged stockholder of the Company filed a stockholder derivative lawsuit in the federal court for the Middle District of Tennessee, asserting claims on behalf of the Company against certain current and former officers and directors for alleged breaches of duties owed to the Company. The complaint refers to the securities lawsuit described above and incorporates substantively similar allegations.


Other

The Company has employment or letter agreements with certain officers of the Company and has adopted policies to which certain officers of the Company are eligible to participate, which grant these employees the right to receive a portion or multiple of their base salary, pro-rata bonus, bonus, and/or continuation of certain benefits, for a defined period of time, in the event of certain terminations of the officers' employment, as described in those agreements and policies.

119


13.       Self-Insurance

The Company obtains various insurance coverages, including general and professional liability and workers compensation programs, from commercial carriers at stated amounts as defined in the applicable policy. Losses related to deductible amounts are accrued based on the Company's estimate of expected losses plus incurred but not reported claims.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company accrued reserves of $153.0 million and $155.8 million, respectively, under the Company's insurance programs, of which $88.4 million and $92.5 million is classified as long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company accrued $18.0 million and $22.7 million, respectively, of estimated amounts receivable from the insurance companies under these insurance programs.

The Company has secured self-insured retention risk under workers' compensation programs with restricted cash deposits of $21.9 million and $24.0 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Letters of credit securing the programs aggregated to $61.3 million and $55.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In addition, the Company also had deposits of $7.7 million and $12.3 million, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, to fund claims paid under a high deductible, collateralized insurance policy.

Effective December 31, 2020, the Company began using its wholly-owned captive insurance company for the purpose of insuring certain portions of its risk retention under its general and professional liability insurance programs.

14.       Stock-Based Compensation

The following table sets forth information about the Company's restricted stock awards and restricted stock units:
(in thousands, except value per share and unit)Number of Restricted Stock Units and Stock AwardsWeighted
Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding on January 1, 20184,770 17.13 
Granted3,880 9.39 
Vested(1,579)19.12 
Cancelled/forfeited(1,315)13.19 
Outstanding on December 31, 20185,756 11.78 
Granted4,381 7.81 
Vested(1,571)13.71 
Cancelled/forfeited(1,314)11.18 
Outstanding on December 31, 20197,252 9.08 
Granted4,603 6.92 
Vested(2,073)10.19 
Cancelled/forfeited(1,277)8.83 
Outstanding on December 31, 20208,505 7.68 

As of December 31, 2020, there was $38.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding, unvested share-based compensation awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years and is based on grant date fair value.

120


During 2020, grants of restricted stock units and stock awards under the Company's 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan were as follows:
(in thousands, except for per share and unit amounts)Restricted Stock Unit and Stock Award GrantsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueTotal Grant Date Fair Value
Three months ended March 31, 20204,438 $7.06 $31,341 
Three months ended June 30, 202078 $3.91 $303 
Three months ended September 30, 202052 $2.78 $144 
Three months ended December 31, 202035 $2.91 $102 

The Company has an employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees. Under the plan, eligible employees of the Company can purchase shares of the Company's common stock on a quarterly basis at a discounted price through accumulated payroll deductions. Each participating employee may elect to deduct up to 15% of his or her base pay each quarter and no more than 200 shares may be purchased by a participating employee each quarter. Subject to certain limitations specified in the plan, on the last trading date of each calendar quarter, the amount deducted from each participant's pay over the course of the quarter will be used to purchase whole shares of the Company's common stock at a purchase price equal to 90% of the closing market price on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. The Company reserved 1,800,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the plan.

15.       Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the components of basic EPS and also gives effect to dilutive common stock equivalents. Under the treasury stock method, diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments that are convertible into common stock were exercised or could result in the issuance of common stock. Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents include unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, and convertible debt instruments and warrants.

The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except for per share amounts)202020192018
Income attributable to common stockholders:
Net income (loss)$82,019 $(267,931)$(528,258)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic183,498 185,907 187,468 
Effect of dilutive securities - Unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, and warrants888 
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted184,386 185,907 187,468 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders$0.45 $(1.44)$(2.82)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders$0.44 $(1.44)$(2.82)

121


For the purposes of computing diluted EPS, weighted average shares outstanding do not include potentially dilutive securities that are anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method and performance-based equity awards are included based on the attainment of the applicable performance metrics as of the end of the reporting period. The following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2020
2019(1)
2018(1)
Non-performance-based restricted stock and restricted stock units6.86.45.6
Performance-based restricted stock and restricted stock units1.61.10.8
Warrants(2)
0.5

(1)As a result of the net loss reported for the period, all unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, convertible debt instruments, and potential shares issuable under warrants were antidilutive for the period and as such were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

(2)The option to exercise the warrants to acquire the Company's common stock outstanding at December 31, 2018 expired unexercised in 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding excludes the impact of conversion of the principal amount of $316.3 million of the Company's 2.75% convertible senior notes which were repaid in cash at their maturity on June 15, 2018.

16.       Share Repurchase Program

On November 1, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program that authorizes the Company to purchase up to $100.0 million in the aggregate of the Company's common stock. The share repurchase program is intended to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or block trades, or by any combination of these methods, in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A)applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations.

The size, scope, and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market, and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory, and contractual requirements or consents, and capital availability. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be suspended, modified, or discontinued at any time at the Company's discretion without prior notice. Shares of stock repurchased under the program will be held as treasury shares. As a precautionary measure in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company temporarily suspended purchases under the share repurchase plan in March 2020.

Repurchases under the share repurchase program were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)202020192018
Total number of shares repurchased3,063 3,005 1,281 
Average price paid per share$5.92 $6.56 $6.64 
Aggregate purchase price$18,123 $19,710 $8,500 

As of December 31, 2020, approximately $44.0 million remains available under the share repurchase program.

17.       Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement savings plan for all employees that meet minimum employment criteria. Such plan provides that the participants may defer eligible compensation subject to certain Internal Revenue Code maximum amounts. The Company makes matching contributions in amounts equal to 25.0% of the employee's contribution to such plan, for contributions up to a maximum of 4.0% of compensation. An additional matching contribution of 12.5%, subject to the same limit on compensation, may be made at the discretion of the Company based upon the Company's performance. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company's expense for such plan was $6.2 million, $8.0 million, and $8.3 million, respectively.

122


18.       Income Taxes

The benefit (provision) for income taxes is comprised of the following:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Federal:
Current$55 $64 $(113)
Deferred5,840 2,654 52,367 
Total federal5,895 2,718 52,254 
State:
Current(11,247)(449)(2,798)
Deferred (included in federal above)
Total state(11,247)(449)(2,798)
Total$(5,352)$2,269 $49,456 

A reconciliation of the benefit (provision) for income taxes to the amount computed at the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 21% is as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Tax benefit (provision) at U.S. statutory rate$(18,348)$56,742 $121,320 
State taxes, net of federal income tax(11,909)10,423 21,576 
Valuation allowance27,913 (60,376)5,713 
Goodwill impairment(88,265)
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act(6,042)
Stock compensation(2,118)(2,639)(4,717)
Meals and entertainment(169)(416)(493)
Tax credits(106)688 
Other(721)(1,359)(324)
Total$(5,352)$2,269 $49,456 

123


Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
As of December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Deferred income tax assets:
Operating lease obligations$322,122 $406,172 
Financing lease obligations90,011 156,913 
Operating loss carryforwards237,728 330,983 
Accrued expenses96,410 54,154 
Intangible assets60,069 11,160 
Tax credits50,356 50,356 
Investment in unconsolidated ventures5,105 
Capital loss carryforward2,263 40,723 
Other8,561 8,098 
Total gross deferred income tax asset872,625 1,058,559 
Valuation allowance(380,990)(408,903)
Net deferred income tax assets491,635 649,656 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Operating lease right-of-use assets(277,489)(328,100)
Property, plant and equipment(223,703)(303,853)
Investment in unconsolidated ventures(33,100)
Total gross deferred income tax liability(501,192)(665,053)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)$(9,557)$(15,397)

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards generated in 2017 and prior of approximately $812.0 million and $1.2 billion, respectively which are available to offset future taxable income from 2021 through 2037. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards generated after 2017 of $181.1 million and $174.9 million, respectively, which have an indefinite life, but with usage limited to 80% of taxable income in any given year. The Company had state capital loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2020, which are available to offset future capital gains through 2023. The Company determined that a valuation allowance was required after consideration of the Company's estimated future reversal of existing timing differences as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company does not consider estimates of future taxable income in its determination due to the existence of cumulative historical operating losses. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a reduction of approximately $27.9 million to reflect the required valuation allowance of $381.0 million as of December 31, 2020.

A summary of the change in the Company's valuation allowance is as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Increase (decrease) before consideration of adoption of ASC 842$(27,913)$60,376 
Increase due to the adoption of ASC 84213,790 
Other decrease during the year(1,680)
Total increase (decrease) in valuation allowance$(27,913)$72,486 

The Company has recorded valuation allowances of $328.4 million and $318.4 million against its federal and state net operating losses as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its state capital loss carryforward of $2.3 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company had recorded a valuation allowance against its federal and state capital loss carryforwards of $40.7 million as of December 31, 2019. The Company's sale of its ownership interest in the CCRC Venture in 2020 utilized all of the capital loss carryforward for federal tax purposes and a portion of its net operating losses. The Company recorded a decrease in the valuation allowance of $117.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of the Healthpeak transaction. The Company also recorded a valuation allowance against federal and state credits of $50.3 million as of both December 31, 2020 and 2019.
124



As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had gross tax affected unrecognized tax benefits of $18.4 million and $18.3 million, respectively, of which, if recognized, would result in an income tax benefit recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. Interest and penalties related to these tax positions are classified as tax expense in the Company's consolidated financial statements. Total interest and penalties reserved is $0.1 million as of both December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2020, the Company's tax returns for years 2016 through 2019 are subject to future examination by tax authorities. In addition, the net operating losses from prior years are subject to adjustment under examination. The Company does not expect that unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions taken with respect to 2020 and prior years will significantly change in 2021.

A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Balance at beginning of period$18,326 $18,507 
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
Additions (reductions) for tax positions related to prior years59 (181)
Balance at end of period$18,385 $18,326 

19.       Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
(in thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:202020192018
Interest paid$204,696 $244,469 $260,706 
Income taxes paid, net of refunds$8,878 $1,534 $2,058 
Capital expenditures, net of related payables:
Capital expenditures - non-development, net$139,592 $235,797 $182,249 
Capital expenditures - development, net13,667 24,595 24,687 
Capital expenditures - non-development - reimbursable27,846 34,809 12,165 
Capital expenditures - development - reimbursable1,709 
Trade accounts payable4,766 8,891 4,663 
Net cash paid$185,871 $304,092 $225,473 
Acquisition of communities from Healthpeak:
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net$286,734 $$
Operating lease right-of-use assets(63,285)
Financing lease obligations129,196 
Operating lease obligations74,335 
Loss (gain) on debt modification and extinguishment, net(19,731)
Net cash paid$407,249 $$
Master Agreement with Ventas:
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net$(66,444)$$
Operating lease right-of-use assets(153,213)
Other assets, net(42,354)
Long-term debt34,053 
Financing lease obligations7,077 
Operating lease obligations362,944 
Additional paid-in-capital(22,883)
Net cash paid$119,180 $$
125


For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Acquisition of other assets, net of related payables and cash received:
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net$684 $44 $237,563 
Other intangible assets, net453 (4,345)
Financing lease obligations64,260 36,120 
Other liabilities2,433 
Net cash paid$64,944 $497 $271,771 
Proceeds from sale of CCRC Venture, net:
Investments in unconsolidated ventures$(14,848)$$
Current portion of long-term debt34,706 
Other liabilities60,748 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(369,831)
Net cash received$(289,225)$$
Proceeds from sale of other assets, net:
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net$(1,318)$(4,422)$(4,950)
Assets held for sale(34,348)(79,054)(197,111)
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net(938)(379)(93,098)
Investments in unconsolidated ventures(156)(58,179)
Financing lease obligations93,514 
Refundable fees and deferred revenue8,632 
Other liabilities(786)(1,479)1,139 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(4,701)(7,245)(249,754)
Net cash received$(42,091)$(92,735)$(499,807)
Lease termination and modification, net:
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net$$$(2,804)
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net(87,464)
Financing lease obligations58,099 
Deferred liabilities70,835 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(5,761)
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net34,283 
Net cash paid (1)
$$$67,188 
126


Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities:
Purchase of treasury stock:
Treasury stock$$$4,244 
Accounts payable(4,244)
Net$$$
Assets designated as held for sale:
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net$$$(517)
Assets held for sale7,935 28,608 198,445 
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net(7,935)(28,608)(197,928)
Net$$$
Healthpeak master lease modification:
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net$(57,462)$$
Operating lease right-of-use assets88,044 
Financing lease obligations70,874 
Operating lease obligations(101,456)
Net$$$
Other non-cash lease transactions, net:
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net$$(636)$(248)
Property, plant and equipment and leasehold intangibles, net10,707 (1,963)(132,733)
Operating lease right-of-use assets(7,941)18,148 
Operating lease obligations15,126 (18,206)
Financing lease obligations(15,483)165,918 
Deferred liabilities(122,304)
Other liabilities(77)(731)(620)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net(37,731)
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,332)3,388 127,718 
Net$$$

(1)    The net cash paid to terminate community leases is presented within the consolidated statements of cash flows based upon the lease classification of the terminated leases. Net cash paid of $54.6 million for the termination of operating leases is presented within net cash provided by operating activities and net cash paid of $12.5 million for the termination of financing leases is presented within net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018.

During 2019, the Company and its venture partner contributed cash in an aggregate amount of $13.3 million to a consolidated venture which owns 2 senior housing communities as of December 31, 2020. The Company obtained a $6.6 million promissory note receivable from its venture partner secured by a 50% equity interest in the venture in a non-cash exchange for the Company funding the $13.3 million aggregate contribution in cash. At the closing of the sale of a senior housing community during 2019 by the consolidated venture, the consolidated venture distributed $6.3 million to the partners with the Company receiving a $3.1 million repayment on the promissory note in a non-cash exchange.

Refer to Note 2 for a schedule of the non-cash adjustments to the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 as a result of the adoption of new accounting standards.

127


Restricted cash consists principally of escrow deposits for real estate taxes, property insurance, and capital expenditures, debt service reserve accounts required by certain lenders under mortgage debt agreements, and deposits as security for self-insured retention risk under workers' compensation programs and property insurance programs. The components of restricted cash are as follows:
 December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Current:  
Real estate tax and property insurance escrows$17,465 $16,299 
Replacement reserve escrows9,465 9,071 
Resident deposits253 475 
Other876 1,011 
Subtotal28,059 26,856 
Long term:  
Insurance deposits21,903 23,692 
Debt service reserve17,784 281 
CCRCs escrows15,329 10,641 
Letters of credit collateral1,653 
Subtotal56,669 34,614 
Total$84,728 $61,470 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sums to the total of the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash:
Cash and cash equivalents$380,420 $240,227 
Restricted cash28,059 26,856 
Long-term restricted cash56,669 34,614 
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$465,148 $301,697 

20.       Segment Information

The Company has 5 reportable segments: Independent Living; Assisted Living and Memory Care; CCRCs; Health Care Services; and Management Services. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses; for which separate financial information is available; and whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to assess the performance of the individual segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment.

Independent Living. The Company's Independent Living segment includes owned or leased communities are primarily designed for middle to upper income seniors who desire to live in a residential setting that feels like home, without the efforts of ownership. The majority of the Company's independent living communities consist of both independent and assisted living units in a single community, which allows residents to age-in-place by providing them with a broad continuum of senior independent and assisted living services to accommodate their changing needs.

Assisted Living and Memory Care. The Company's Assisted Living and Memory Care segment includes owned or leased communities that offer housing and 24-hour assistance with ADLs for mid-acuity and frail elderly residents. The Company's assisted living and memory care communities include both freestanding, multi-story communities, as well as smaller, freestanding, single story communities. The Company also provides memory care services at freestanding memory care communities that are specially designed for residents with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

CCRCs. The Company's CCRCs segment includes large owned or leased communities that offer a variety of living arrangements and services to accommodate a broad spectrum of physical ability and healthcare needs. Most of the Company's
128


CCRCs have independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing available on one campus or within the immediate area.

Health Care Services. The Company's Health Care Services segment includes the home health, hospice, and outpatient therapy services provided to residents of many of its communities and to seniors living outside its communities. The Health Care Services segment does not include the skilled nursing and inpatient healthcare services provided in the Company's skilled nursing units, which are included in the Company's CCRCs segment.

Management Services. The Company's Management Services segment includes communities operated by the Company pursuant to management agreements. In some of the cases, the controlling financial interest in the community is held by third parties and, in other cases, the community is owned in a venture structure in which the Company has an ownership interest. Under the management agreements for these communities, the Company receives management fees as well as reimbursed expenses, which represent the reimbursement of expenses it incurs on behalf of the owners.

The accounting policies of the Company's reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 2.

The following table sets forth selected segment financial data:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Revenue and other operating income:
Independent Living (1)(2)
$524,421 $544,558 $599,977 
Assisted Living and Memory Care (1)(2)
1,753,861 1,815,938 1,995,851 
CCRCs (1)(2)
340,337 402,175 416,408 
Health Care Services (1)(2)
389,697 447,260 436,975 
Management Services (3)
531,879 847,157 1,082,215 
Total revenue and other operating income$3,540,195 $4,057,088 $4,531,426 
Segment operating income:(4)
Independent Living$182,813 $203,741 $240,609 
Assisted Living and Memory Care428,601 518,636 628,982 
CCRCs53,180 72,072 92,212 
Health Care Services1,863 24,987 34,080 
Management Services130,690 57,108 71,986 
Total segment operating income797,147 876,544 1,067,869 
General and administrative (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense)206,575 219,289 259,475 
Facility operating lease expense:
Independent Living60,445 81,680 93,496 
Assisted Living and Memory Care137,900 157,823 178,716 
CCRCs20,406 24,248 24,856 
Corporate and Management Services5,282 5,915 6,226 
Depreciation and amortization:
Independent Living70,803 81,745 91,899 
Assisted Living and Memory Care224,790 222,574 261,365 
CCRCs38,426 44,163 53,551 
Health Care Services749 2,247 3,201 
Corporate and Management Services24,458 28,704 37,439 
129


For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Asset impairment:
Independent Living31,317 1,812 2,013 
Assisted Living and Memory Care61,640 32,229 436,892 
CCRCs12,413 4,983 6,669 
Health Care Services7,578 9,055 
Corporate and Management Services1,938 2,664 35,264 
Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net(2,303)3,388 162,001 
Income (loss) from operations$(97,692)$(44,498)$(594,249)
Total interest expense:
Independent Living$44,682 $46,713 $58,783 
Assisted Living and Memory Care134,015 166,097 174,459 
CCRCs19,928 27,426 26,746 
Corporate and Management Services10,154 8,105 20,281 
$208,779 $248,341 $280,269 
Total capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, and leasehold intangibles:
Independent Living$47,889 $78,831 $51,510 
Assisted Living and Memory Care90,354 157,845 125,750 
CCRCs18,709 33,535 26,615 
Health Care Services515 484 902 
Corporate and Management Services23,638 24,506 16,033 
$181,105 $295,201 $220,810 

As of December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Total assets:
Independent Living$1,419,838 $1,441,652 
Assisted Living and Memory Care3,787,611 4,157,610 
CCRCs738,121 742,809 
Health Care Services233,178 256,715 
Corporate and Management Services723,010 595,647 
Total assets$6,901,758 $7,194,433 

(1)All revenue is earned from external third parties in the United States.
(2)The Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care, CCRCs, and Health Care Services segments include $11.8 million, $62.6 million, $18.5 million, and $22.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020 of other operating income recognized for grants pursuant to the Provider Relief Fund described in Note 3 and other government sources. Allocations to the applicable segment generally reflect the segment's receipt and acceptance of the amounts or the segment's proportional utilization of the grant.
(3)Management services segment revenue includes reimbursements for which the Company is the primary obligor of costs incurred on behalf of managed communities.
(4)Segment operating income is defined as segment revenues less segment facility operating expenses (excluding facility depreciation and amortization) and costs incurred on behalf of managed communities.
130



21.       Subsequent Events

On February 24, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with affiliates of HCA Healthcare, Inc., providing for the sale of 80% of the Company’s equity in its Health Care Services segment for a purchase price of $400 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement, including a reduction for the remaining outstanding balance as of the closing of Medicare advance payments and deferred payroll tax payments related to the Health Care Services segment, which were $75.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. The Purchase Agreement also contains certain agreed upon indemnities for the benefit of the purchaser. The closing of the sale transaction is anticipated to occur in the late first half or early second half of 2021, subject to receipt of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, at closing of the transaction, the Company will retain a 20% equity interest in the business. There can be no assurance that the transaction will close or, if it does, when the actual closing will occur.
131


SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2020
(In thousands)
Additions
DescriptionBalance at beginning of periodCharged to costs and expensesCharged to other accountsDeductionsBalance at end of period
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
Year ended December 31, 2018$336,087 $330 (1)$$$336,417 
Year ended December 31, 2019$336,417 $60,376 (2)$13,790 (3)$(1,680)$408,903 
Year ended December 31, 2020$408,903 $(27,913)(4)$$$380,990 

(1) Additional valuation allowance for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of $6,042 and federal credits of $207, partially offset by reduction of valuation allowance for federal and state net operating losses and federal credits of $5,919.

(2)  Additional valuation allowance for federal and state net operating losses.

(3)  Additional valuation allowance charged to accumulated deficit upon the adoption of ASC 842.

(4)  Reduction of valuation allowance for federal and state net operating losses.



132


Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)amended). The Audit CommitteeOur management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management's Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is currently chaired by Ms. Warrenresponsible for establishing and also consists of Messrs. Bromley and Wielansky. All members are independent directorsmaintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined underin Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the listing standardssupervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and under section 10A(m)(3)effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Exchange Act, and the Board hasTreadway Commission (2013 framework). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined that each of Ms. Warren and Messrs. Bromley and Wielansky is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. No member of the Audit Committee simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies.

Corporate Governance

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines setting forth the expectations and standards the Board hasto be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.


Based on the role, size,Company's evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020. Management reviewed the results of their assessment with our Audit Committee. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as stated in their report which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and compositionincorporated herein by reference.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

On February 22, 2021, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board and its committees, the functioningof Directors of the BoardCompany approved a performance-based cash award (the “Award”) for Lucinda M. Baier, the Company’s President and its committees, evaluationChief Executive Officer. The Award was issued outside of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The target amount of the Award of $2,765,000 represented one half of her target long-term incentive compensation awarded for 2021, and the remaining half was awarded in the form of time-based restricted stock units under the Plan consistent with the prior year. The mix of time-based restricted stock units and performance-based cash awards to Ms. Baier was similar to the mix awarded to other executive officers for 2021. Such performance based awards were denominated in cash to conserve available shares under the Plan. Seventy-five percent of Ms. Baier’s target Award is eligible to vest on February 27, 2024 and twenty-five percent is eligible to vest on February 27, 2025, in each case subject to continued employment and achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. The portion of the target Award eligible to vest on February 27, 2024 is divided into three equal tranches, the first of which is subject to a strategic goal for 2021 and the second and third of which are subject to year-over-year same community RevPAR growth for 2022 and 2023, respectively. The portion of the target Award eligible to vest on February 27, 2025 is subject to a relative total stockholder return performance goal for the three year period ending December 31, 2023. Performance below the threshold level of achievement for a performance goal will result in forfeiture of the target cash amount for the applicable portion of the Award, performance at the targeted level of achievement will result in the vesting of 100% of the applicable target cash amount, and performance at or above the target level of achievement will result in vesting of up to 150% of applicable target cash amount, with vesting percentages to be interpolated between the levels.
133


PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

To the extent not set forth herein, the information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussions under the headings "Election of Directors," "Corporate Governance," and "Executive Officers" in our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2020.

Our Board and its committees, director compensation, succession planning, and other matters. The Board alsoof Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all employees, directors, and officers, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, as well as a Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers, which applies to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer. These guidelines and codesTreasurer, both of which are available on our website at www.brookdale.com/investor. Any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of such codes of ethics granted to a principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or person performing similar functions, or to any executive officer or director, will be posted on our website.

Stockholder Proposals


Item 11.    Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussions under the headings "Director Compensation" and Nominations for 2020 Annual Meeting

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board as described"Executive Compensation" in our definitive proxy statementDefinitive Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to be filed with the SEC on September 18, 2019 (the “2019 Proxy Statement”). While we havewithin 120 days of December 31, 2020.


Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

To the extent not changed such procedures, on April 21, 2020 we announced thatset forth herein, the Board has determined that the 2020 annual meetinginformation required by this item regarding security ownership of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held on Tuesday, June 30, 2020. Because the Annual Meeting will be held more than 30 dayscertain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the anniversary date ofdiscussion under the heading "Stock Ownership Information" in our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, the deadlines set forth in the 2019Definitive Proxy Statement for stockholder proposals and director nominations for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting no longer apply. The new deadline is the close of businessStockholders or in an amendment to this Annual Report on May 1, 2020 (which we determinedForm 10-K, to be a reasonable time before we expect to print and distribute our proxy materials prior tofiled with the Annual Meeting) for proposals and director nominationsSEC within 120 days of stockholders intended to be included in our proxy statement and form of proxy for the Annual Meeting pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act or the proxy access provisions of our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and proposals and director nominations of stockholders intended to be considered at the Annual Meeting other than by means of inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy card. Stockholders submitting proposals or nominations using the foregoing procedures should deliver or mail the proposal or nomination, and all supporting information required by Rule14a-8 or our Amended and Restated Bylaws, as applicable, to Brookdale Senior Living Inc., 111 Westwood Place, Suite 400, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027, Attention: Secretary. In addition to complying with this deadline, stockholder proposals and nominations must comply with all applicable SEC rules, including Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, and the requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws and applicable law.

8        

December 31, 2020.


Executive Officers


The following table sets forthprovides certain information concerningas of December 31, 2020 with respect to our executive officers. See “Information Concerning Directors”equity compensation plans (after giving effect to shares issued and/or vesting on such date):

Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Plan category
(a) (1)
(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2)
$4,574,104 $6.99 $8,188,474 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (3)
35,936
Total$4,574,104 $8,224,410 

(1)The table above includes 25,297 shares issuable pursuant to vested restricted stock units; 4,370,880 shares potentially issuable pursuant to unvested restricted stock units, including 236,496 shares that may be issued for biographical information for Ms. Baier.

  Name

Age

Position

  Lucinda M. Baier

55

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

  George T. Hicks

62

Executive Vice President–Finance and Treasurer

  Diane Johnson May

61

Executive Vice President–Human Resources

  H. Todd Kaestner

64

Executive Vice President–Asset Management and Division President–Entry Fee

  Cindy R. Kent

51

Executive Vice President and President of Senior Living

  Anna-Gene O’Neal

53

Division President–Health Care Services

  Mary Sue Patchett

57

Executive Vice President–Strategic Operations

  Steven E. Swain

52

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  Chad C. White

44

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

George T. Hicks became our Executive Vice President–Financeperformance achievement in July 2006excess of target; and our Treasurer in January 2016. Prior177,927 shares that may be issued pursuant to July 2006, Mr. Hicks served as Executive Vice President–Finance and Internal Audit, Secretary and Treasurer of ARC since September 1993. Mr. Hicks had served in various capacities for ARC’s predecessors since 1985, including Chief Financial Officer from September 1993 to April 2003 and Vice President–Finance and Treasurer from November 1989 to September 1993. He received a bachelor’s degree with distinction in philosophy from Stanford University and an M.B.A. in finance from the University of Tennessee.

Diane Johnson May joined Brookdale as Executive Vice President–Human Resources in May 2019. Prior to joining Brookdale, Ms. Johnson May served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources of Kraft Foods Group, Inc. from October 2012 to October 2015, after having served in a number of key leadership roles for Kraft Foods Inc. since joining in 1980, including Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Kraft Foods International, and Vice President, Human Resources at various Kraft units. Ms. Johnson May also served as Managing Vice President of The Deli Source Inc. from September 2017 to April 2019 and was principal of Diane May Consulting, LLC from January 2016 to September 2017. She earned a bachelor’s degree in business administration and management from Elmhurst College.

H. Todd Kaestner became our Executive Vice President–Asset Management and Division President–Entry Fee in June 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Kaestner served as Executive Vice President–Corporate Development since July 2006. Mr. Kaestner served as Executive Vice President–Corporate Development of ARC since September 1993 and served in various capacities for ARC’s predecessors since 1985, including Vice President–Development from 1988 to 1993 and Chief Financial Officer from 1985 to 1988. He is an honors graduate of Vanderbilt University, where he studied economics, and holds an M.B.A. in finance and economics from University of Louisville

Cindy R. Kent joined Brookdale as Executive Vice President and President of Senior Living in January 2020. Prior to joining Brookdale, Ms. Kent served as President and General Manager of 3M’s Infection Prevention Division from 2016 to 2018 and President and General Manager of 3M’s Drug Delivery Systems Division from 2014 and 2016. Prior to that, she held senior leadership roles at Medtronic from 2007 to 2013. Ms. Kent earned an MBA in marketing and a Master of Divinity from Vanderbilt University. She also holds a BS in industrial engineering and management sciences from Northwestern University, earned a certification in Strategic Finance from the Harvard Business School, and is Six Sigma green belt trained. Ms. Kent has been appointed to serve as a trustee on the Vanderbilt University Board of Trust beginning July 2020.

Anna-Gene O’Nealbecame our Division President–Health Care Services in August 2019, after having joined the Company as Division Vice President–BHS Hospice in June 2019. Prior to that, Ms. O’Neal served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alive Hospice, a largenon-profit hospice provider in Tennessee, since 2012. From 2007 to

        9


2012, Ms. O’Neal served in quality and performance improvement leadership roles, including Senior Vice President, of CogentHMG, an industry leader in developing and managing hospital medicine programs nationwide, and from 2001 to 2007 she served as Vice President, Hospital Operations and Clinical Quality for Essent Healthcare, Inc., a multistatefor-profit hospital system. Ms. O’Neal is a Registered Nurse and received B.S.N., M.S.N. and M.B.A. degrees from Vanderbilt University.

Mary Sue Patchett became our Executive Vice President–Strategic Operations in March 2020 after serving as Executive Vice President–Community Operations since November 2015 and, prior to that, Division President for one of our senior housing divisions since February 2013 and Divisional Vice President since joining Brookdale in September 2011 in connection with our Horizon Bay acquisition. Ms. Patchett has over 30 years of senior care and housing experience serving in leadership roles. Previously, Ms. Patchett served as Chief Operating Officer of Horizon Bay from January 2011 through August 2011 and as Senior Vice President of Operations from March 2008 through December 2011. Prior to joining Horizon Bay, she was President and owner of Patchett & Associates, Inc., a management consulting firm for senior housing and other healthcare companies, from 2005 until March 2008. Ms. Patchett had previously served as Divisional Vice President for Alterra for over six years and started in senior living with nine years in numerous leadership positions at Sunrise Senior Living. Ms. Patchett has served on numerous industry boards and is serving on the Board of Directors of Argentum and the Board of Directors of Florida Senior Living Association as its past chair. She holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from George Mason University.

Steven E. Swainjoined Brookdale as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in September 2018. Prior to joining Brookdale, Mr. Swain served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DISH Network Corporation from October 2014 to August 2018, after having served as its Senior Vice President of Programming from April 2014 to October 2014, and as its Vice President of Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis since joining the company in 2011. Prior to DISH Network, Mr. Swain spent more than 15 years working in the telecommunications sector, most recently at CenturyLink, Inc. and Qwest Communications International, Inc. (acquired by CenturyLink), where he served in multiple leadership roles in finance, including corporate financial planning and analysis, treasury, and investor relations, as well as in network engineering. Mr. Swain earned his B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin–Madison and his M.B.A. degree from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Chad C. White joined Brookdale in February 2007 and has served as our Executive Vice President since January 2018, our General Counsel since March 2017 and our Secretary since March 2013. He previously served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel from March 2017 until January 2018, our Senior Vice President andCo-General Counsel from July 2014 to March 2017, our Vice President andCo-General Counsel from March 2013 to July 2014, and our Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary prior to that. Before joining Brookdale, Mr. White served in legal roles with Dollar General Corporation and Bass, Berry & Sims PLC. Mr. White received his law degree from the Vanderbilt University School of Law where he was elected to the Order of the Coif, and a B.S. in Mass Communication and Political Science from Middle Tennessee State University.

10        


Item 11. Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the key elements of our executive compensation program and compensation decisions regarding the following named executive officers (NEOs) for 2019:

Name

Position

Lucinda M. Baier

President and Chief Executive Officer

Steven E. Swain

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mary Sue Patchett

Executive Vice President–Strategic Operations

Chad C. White

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

H. Todd Kaestner

Executive Vice President–Asset Management and Division President–Entry Fee

Each of the named executive officers served in the roles indicated for the full-year 2019, except that Ms. Patchett served as Executive Vice President–Community Operations prior to being appointed to her current role on March 23, 2020, and Mr. Kaestner served as Executive Vice President–Corporate Development prior to being appointed to his current roles on June 30, 2019.

Table of Contents to Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        11


Executive Summary

Executive Compensation Program Highlights

LOGO What We Do

Pay for Performance A significant portion of our NEOs’ target direct compensation is awarded in the form ofvariable, at-risk compensation based on company performance.

Clawback Policy (New for 2020)Clawback policy provides the Committee the ability to recover or require the forfeiture of performance-based compensation paid as a result of any material financial restatement or material miscalculation of a financial metric used to determine the vesting or payment of performance-based compensation.

Caps on Annual Incentive Payouts Payouts under our annual cash incentive plan are capped.

RevPAR and Relative TSR Performance Goals Performance goals for 2019 performance-based restricted shares are3-year compound annual growth rate of same community RevPAR and our3-year relative TSR.

Annual Say on Pay “Say-on-pay” advisory vote conducted annually to solicit stockholders’ views on our executive compensation programs. 2019 results were 94% in favor.(1)

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines Ownership guidelines require 5x, 4x, and 3x base salary for our CEO, CFO, and other executive officers, respectively.

LOGO What We Do NOT DO

No Above Median Benchmarking The Committee aims to provide target total direct compensation for NEOs that is at or below the market median identified in the independent compensation consultant’s market study.

No Defined Benefit Plans/SERPs We do not sponsor any defined benefit pension or supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs).

No Tax Gross Ups Tax gross-ups are not provided except in the limited circumstance ofcertain re-location expenses.

No Excessive Perquisites Minimal perquisites are provided, other thancertain re-location expenses.

No Excessive Guaranteed Compensation Our 2019 annual incentive plan andunvested performance-based restricted stock awards do not have minimum guaranteed payout levels–this compensation is “at risk.”

No Pledging or Hedging Our insider trading policy prohibits all our directors and executive officers from pledging or hedging Brookdale stock.

No Stock Options We have never granted stock options.

2019 CEO and Other NEOs Pay Mix (2)

LOGO

LOGO

12        


Annual Cash Incentive Plan

2019 Incentive Plan Design and Achievement

Performance goals were chosen to focus our leaders on execution of our operational turnaround strategy and were generally cascaded to our corporate, divisional, and community leadership. Target levels were generally reflective of our 2019 budget approved by the Board. Actual 2019 achievement reflects progress made on our strategy, though overall performance was below our expectations.

Measure

  Weighting   Achievement  
/ Payout

Resident Fee Revenue

  

10%

 

106%

Facility Operating Income

  

40%

 

29%

Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  

10%

 

103%

Strategic Objectives

  

40%

 

52%

Aggregate Achievement/Payout

   

54%

2017–2019 Annual Incentive Plan Achievement(3)

LOGO

(1)

Represents percentage of votes cast.

(2)

Represents elements of 2019 target total direct compensation and, for other NEO’s, the average of such other NEO’s pay mix elements. See “Summary of 2019 Compensation Program” below for more information.

(3)

Represents weighted average payout for the named executive officers for the applicable year who were serving at the end of such year.

Compensation Philosophy

The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) intends to ensure market-competitive executive compensation opportunities through a program designed to:

emphasize pay for performance by linking a significant portion of target total direct compensation to variable,at-risk components measured by our short- and long-term financial performance and other objectives designed to focus executives on key strategic initiatives;

align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders; and

attract and retain key executives to execute on our strategy.

In determining the appropriate level and mix of compensation for each executive officer, the Committee takes into account the officer’s experience, scope of responsibility, individual performance, and retention risk; the Committee’s independent consultant’s market compensation studies; management input; internal equity; and other information as it deems necessary and appropriate. Nopre-determined weighting is assigned to any factor, and the emphasis placed on a specific factor may vary among executive officers, reflecting market practice, business needs, and retention and succession considerations at the time compensation decisions are made.

        13


Principal Elements of Compensation

Our executive compensation program generally consists of these principal elements:

Element

Form

Description

Link to Stockholder Value

Base Salary

Cash

Amount intended to reflect the level and scope of responsibility, experience, and skills of an executive, the individual performance of the executive, retention risks, and competitive market practices.

Assists us in attracting, and encourages retention of, key executives through an amount of fixed income paid throughout the year.

Annual Incentive Plan

Cash

Opportunity isat-risk with no guaranteed payout. Level of payout tied to achievement of company financial objectives and strategic objectives approved by the Committee each year, which generally are reflective of, or support, our annual budget and business plan.

Focuses executives on taking steps necessary to meet expectations set forth in the annual budget and business plan, which the Committee believes will in turn drive longer-term performance results.

Long- Term Incentive Awards

50%–Time-Based Restricted Shares

Awards granted in 2019 are eligible to vest ratably in four annual installments beginning approximately one year following the grant date, subject to continued employment.

Promotes retention, stock ownership, and alignment of executives’ long-term goals with those of our stockholders.

50%–Performance-Based Restricted Shares

Opportunity isat-risk with no guaranteed vesting. 75% of the award is eligible to vest in February 2022 based on our3-year compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of same community RevPAR performance, and 25% of the award is eligible to vest in February 2023 based on our3-year relative TSR performance.

Encourages executives to achieve long-term goals, including RevPAR (a key performance metric factoring occupancy and rate) and increasing the market value of our common stock.

14        


Process for Determining Executive Compensation

The Committee’s process for determining executive compensation is outlined below, including the role of the Committee, results of our annualsay-on-pay advisory vote and other stockholder feedback, the Committee’s independent consultant, our management, and our compensation peer group.

Role of the Committee

The Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, is responsible for developing, reviewing annually, and administering our compensation program and plans applicable to our executive officers. The Committee meets regularly, typically at least five times per year, to approve all decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers. Compensation decisions regarding our President and Chief Executive Officer are also approved by the independent members of the Board. The Committee reports on its actions to the full Board following each Committee meeting. In fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to executive compensation, the Committee reviews and approves:

Any changes to our executive compensation philosophy;

The base salary, levels of incentive-based compensation, and all other compensation or perquisites of our executive officers;

The design and framework of our incentive-based compensation plans and awards, including the applicable performance objectives and targets;

Levels of achievement under such performance objectives and targets;

Updates to our compensation peer group;

Any employment agreements or severance arrangements with our executive officers; and

Compliance with, and any changes to, our officer stock ownership and retention guidelines.

Role ofSay-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Feedback

The Committee considers the results of our annualsay-on-pay advisory vote and other feedback received from stockholders throughout the year when making executive compensation decisions. At our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, more than 94% of the votes cast on thesay-on-pay advisory vote were in favor of our executive compensation program. The Committee believes this vote affirmed our stockholders’ support of our executive compensation approach and provided assurance the program is reasonable and aligned with stockholder expectations.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

As a best practice, the Committee periodically evaluates its selection of an independent compensation consultant. During 2019, the Committee conducted this evaluation, including reviewing proposals of several potential consultants, and determined to continue to engage F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. (the “Consultant”) as its independent compensation consultant. The Consultant reports directly to the Committee, which has the direct responsibility for appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the Consultant. The Consultant does not provide any services to the Company other than services provided to the Committee. From time to time at the request of the Committee, the Consultant provides recommendations regarding the design and framework of, and amounts awarded under, our executive compensation programs, recommends updates to our compensation peer group and conducts independent market compensation studies using that peer group and other published survey information, attends meetings of the Committee, and communicates with one or more members of the Committee outside of such meetings. For 2019, the Consultant provided each of these services. The Committee conducted a specific review of its relationship with the Consultant and determined that the Consultant’s work for the Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest, consistent with the guidance provided under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 by the SEC and by the NYSE.

        15


Role of Management

When making compensation decisions, the Committee considers input from our President and Chief Executive Officer and certain of our other executive officers. Such input generally includes providing information and analyses for review and advising the Committee concerning compensation decisions (other than when their own compensation is determined) and the design, framework, and performance objectives of our incentive-based compensation plans and awards. Our President and Chief Executive Officer provides compensation recommendations related to our other executive officers for the Committee’s consideration.

Compensation Peer Group

Typically annually, the Committee reviews and approves a compensation peer group comprised of companies recommended by the Consultant. The compensation peer group data is then used by the Consultant when preparing independent market compensation studies for the Committee. The Committee generally uses such peer group data and the Consultant’s studies:

As inputs when determining amounts of base salaries and the target amounts of annual and long-term incentive compensation;

To assess the competitiveness of the target direct compensation and underlying pay mix awarded to our executive officers; and

To evaluate the design, framework, and performance objectives of our incentive-based compensation plans and awards.

The Committee, as advised by the Consultant, generally considered target total direct compensation within a range of +/- 25% of median as reported in the Consultant’s market compensation studies to be competitive.

For 2019 compensation decisions, the Consultant recommended updates to our compensation peer group used for 2018 compensation decisions. The peer group used in competitive comparisons to inform 2019 target compensation opportunities included 15 companies in the health care facilities, healthcare services, managed healthcare, healthcare REIT, hospitality, and restaurant industries. The Committee believes that inclusion of companies from these industries is reflective of the talent market for our business. The peer group companies chosen from the various industries are intended to be reasonably comparable to Brookdale in terms of their median levels of revenue, market capitalization, enterprise value, EBITDA, and number of employees. For 2019, the Committee determined to remove Kindred Healthcare, Inc. due to its going private and to replace Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Centene Corporation and Darden Restaurants, Inc. with Amedysis, Inc., Magellan Health, Inc. and Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. to more closely align the median levels of financial metrics and number of employees of the peer group with ours.

2019 Peer Group

Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.Hyatt Hotels CorporationSelect Medical Holdings Corporation
Amedysis, Inc.LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.The Ensign Group, Inc.
Bloomin’ Brands, Inc.Magellan Health, Inc.Universal Health Services, Inc.
Community Health Systems, Inc.National Healthcare Corp.Welltower Inc.
Encompass Health CorporationQuest Diagnostics IncorporatedWyndham Destinations (f/k/a Wyndham Worldwide Corporation)

16        


2019 Compensation Decisions

Context to Decisions

When making annual decisions for 2019, the Committee conducted a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program that included, among other considerations, external market compensation practices, our recent overall performance and 2019 business plan, our performance objectives under our incentive plans, and the responsibilities and individual performance of each of our named executive officers. The Committee reviewed the Consultant’s market compensation study based on the revised peer group adopted by the Committee for 2019, which indicated that each element of Ms. Baier’s target total direct compensation was below or at the low end of the market range. It further indicated that each of the other named executive officers’ base salaries, target long-term equity awards, and target total direct compensation were at the low end, or below, the market range, and that their target annual incentive opportunities were high relative to the market range.

Following the completion of its review, the Committee approved the principal elements of compensation of our named executive officers for 2019 as shown in the “Summary of 2019 Compensation Program” table below. With the 2019 changes, the target total direct compensation of each of our named executive officers fell within the market ranges shown in the market compensation study, but continues to be below the market median.

Summary of 2019 Compensation Program

The table below sets forth the target total direct compensation (base salary, target annual incentive opportunity, and target long-term incentive awards) for the named executive officers. The table excludes the amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table (generally employer matching on our 401(k) plan, employer-paid premiums on life and disability insurance, and the incremental cost to us of relocation expenses) and special performance bonuses in the aggregate amount of $40,000 paid to Mr. White for his service as interim leader of human resources until May 9, 2019 following the departure of the former Chief People Officer on December 31, 2018.

   Base Salary   Target Annual
Incentive
Opportunity
   Grant Value of
Long-Term
Incentive Awards (1)
   2019
Target Total
Direct Compensation
 

Ms. Baier

  

 

$910,000

 

  

 

135%

 

  

 

$4,750,002

  

 

$6,888,502

Mr. Swain

  

 

$515,000

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

$1,300,005

  

 

$2,330,005

Ms. Patchett

  

 

$467,750

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

$   900,001

  

 

$1,835,501

Mr. White

  

 

$397,500

 

  

 

70%

 

  

 

$   450,001

  

 

$1,125,751

Mr. Kaestner

  

 

$344,500

 

  

 

70%

 

  

 

$   350,006

  

 

$   935,656

(1)

Represents the grant value of time- and performance-based restricted shares (i.e., number of shares granted at target performance multiplied by the stock price on the date of grant). The aggregate Accounting Standards Codification 718,Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), grant date fair values of such awards were approximately 0.5% greater than the grant values included in the table due to the ASC 718 valuation of the relative TSR component of the performance-based restricted shares being 4% greater than the grant value.

        17


Base Salaries

The Committee determined that the base salaries of each of the named executive officers were below or at the low end of the market ranges identified in the Consultant’s market compensation study. Consistent with its compensation philosophy, the Committee determined to increase the named executive officers’ base salaries to bring them within the identified market ranges and towards the market medians. After making such changes, each of the named executive officers’ base salaries continued to be below the market medians. The following table shows the base salaries approved for 2019 compared to the prior year base salaries in effect as of December 31, 2018.

   2019   2018   % Change 

Ms. Baier

  

 

$  910,000

 

  

 

$  825,000

 

  

 

10%

 

Mr. Swain

  

 

$  515,000

 

  

 

$  500,000

 

  

 

3%

 

Ms. Patchett

  

 

$  467,750

 

  

 

$  437,750

 

  

 

7%

 

Mr. White

  

 

$  397,500

 

  

 

$  350,000

 

  

 

14%

 

Mr. Kaestner

  

 

$  344,500

 

  

 

$  325,000

 

  

 

6%

 

Annual Incentive Plan

The named executive officers were eligible to participate in our 2019 annual incentive plan established by the Committee. Amounts payable under the plan were to be determined by the Committee following conclusion of the 2019 performance period based on our results relative to company financial objectives and strategic objectives approved by the Committee. There were no guaranteed payout levels utilized in the 2019 annual incentive plan.

The table below shows the target annual incentive opportunity available to our named executive officers expressed as a percentage of base salary earned during 2019. The target opportunities were consistent with the prior year, except that Ms. Baier’s target opportunity was increased from 125% of her base salary, and Messrs. White’s and Kaestner’s target opportunities were reduced from 80% of their base salaries. The Committee made such changes after finding that Ms. Baier’s target opportunity was below market median, and that Messrs. White’s and Kaestner’s target opportunities were high relative to the market ranges provided by the Consultant.

  Target Opportunity as a % of
Base Salary
       Minimum Payout as a %
of Target Opportunity
       Maximum Payout as a %
of Target Opportunity
 

President and CEO

 

135%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

180%

Mr. Swain & Ms. Patchett 

 

100%

    

Messrs. White & Kaestner

 

70%

                

For 2019, the Committee determined to use company financial objectives and objectively-measured strategic objectives that were developed to focus our leaders on execution of our operational turnaround strategy. Such strategic objectives were generally cascaded to our corporate, divisional, and community leadership. The weighting of each objective, the performance targets applicable to the objectives, and our actual results for 2019 are shown in the table below. The weighting of each company financial objective and the aggregate strategic objectives were consistent with the prior year’s weighting, except that the weighting of Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow was reduced from 20% to 10%, and the weighting of the strategic objectives was increased from 30% to 40%. In order to emphasize the importance of meeting target-levelmove-ins at our consolidated comparable communities, the 2019 annual incentive plan included amove-in multiplier that would have increased the overall strategic objectives payout by between 10% and 50% had 2019move-in performance been 1% to 5% in excess of the 2019 targeted number ofmove-ins. The target performance levels of the objectives were generally reflective of our 2019 budget approved by the Board. Performance below the threshold level would result in no payout for the performance objective, and payout percentages weretarget. Pursuant to be interpolated between the steps shown inSEC guidance, the table below.

18        


  

 

Measure

 

 

 

Weighting

 

  

 

Description and Link to Strategy and Business Plan

 

        

Financial Objectives

 

Resident Fee Revenue

  10%  Resident fee revenue was defined as our 2019 consolidated resident fee revenue, which excludes management fee revenue and reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of managed communities. This measure focused management on improvingtop-line revenue of our seniors housing portfolio and Health Care Services segment, which is a critical component of our strategy. The Board and management use this measure in the budgeting process and when evaluating our results. Level  Payout     

Target / Actual

($ in MM)

 

 

 Maximum  200%  $3,331 
 Actual  105.5%  $3,210 
 Target  100%  $3,203 
 Threshold  25%  $3,107 
     
     
                  
 

Facility Operating Income (“FOI”)(1)

  40%  FOI was defined as our 2019 consolidated resident fee revenue less facility operating expense. FOI reflects the net result of our revenue and the facility operating expenses of our consolidated senior housing portfolio and Health Care Services segment, which are the largest drivers of our financial results and which management has the ability to impact on aday-to-day basis. The Board and management use this measure in the budgeting process and when evaluating our results. Level  Payout     

Target / Actual

($ in MM)

 

 

 Maximum  200%  $938 
 Target  100%  $868 
 Actual  29.3%  $819 
 Threshold  25%  $816 
   
   
                  
      
 

Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow (“CAFCF”)(1)

  10%  CAFCF was defined as the sum of our consolidated Adjusted Free Cash Flow plus our proportionate share of unconsolidated ventures’ Adjusted Free Cash Flow for 2019. The measure reflects the cash generated through our operations and our proportionate share of cash generated at our unconsolidated ventures afternon-development capital expenditures and certain other adjustments. The Board and management use this measure in the budgeting process and when evaluating our ability to service indebtedness or engage in share repurchases, and to make additional capital investments. In addition, the constituent parts of CAFCF were used in our forward-looking guidance and in our quarterly reporting. Level  Payout     

Target / Actual

($ in MM)

 

 

 Maximum  200%  $(30
 Actual  103.3%  $(59
 Target  100%  $(60
 Threshold  25%  $(83
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
                   

Strategic Objectives(2)

 

Move-Ins

  7.5%  Move-ins reflect the number of new residents at our comparable consolidated community portfolio for 2019, and move-outs reflect the percentage of our residents who move out of our comparable consolidated community portfolio for controllable reasons. Our Board and management team focus on such metrics, and the objectives reinforced our 2019 strategy to win locally and leverage scale effectively through maintaining and improving the quality of our communities and aligning our sales, marketing, and operations teams to drive top line performance. The target levels of performance representedmove-in growth of 3% compared to 2018 performance and maintaining prior-year levels of controllable move-outs. Level  Payout     Target / Actual 
   Target/Max   100%   3% growth 
   Threshold  25%   

Maintaining
2018
performance
 
 
 
   Actual  0%   
< 2018
performance
 
 
     
     
 

Move-Outs

  7.5%  Level  Payout     Target / Actual 
   Target/Max   100%   26.3
   Actual  78.6%   26.5
   Threshold  25% �� 27.1
                  
      
 

NPS Survey Participation

  2%  As part of our 2019 business plan, we conducted a net promotor score (NPS) survey among our residents and their families to understand our customers’ engagement and satisfaction levels. The NPS survey and strategic objectives reinforced management’s focus on our strategic priority to provide excellent customer service and expand referral development programs in order to earn the trust of our customers and the communities in which we operate and ultimately increase ourmove-ins and reduce our controllable move-outs. The target levels of performance represented 40% participation in the NPS survey and approximately 15% improvement on our NPS score versus the score from our last survey completed in 2017. Level  Payout     Target / Actual 
 Actual  100%   > 50
 Target/Max  100%   40
 Threshold  25%   35
            
     
 

NPS Score Improvement

  8%  Level  Payout     Target / Actual 
   Actual  100%   
> 20%
improvement
 
 
   Target/Max    100%   
~ 15%
improvement
 
 
         Threshold  25%   ~ 10% decrease 

        19


  

 

Measure

 

 

 

Weighting

 

  

 

Description and Link to Strategy and Business Plan

 

        
 

Community Key Leader Retention

  5 Brookdale’s culture is based on servant leadership, and we believe engaged associates lead to an enhanced resident experience and lower turnover, leading to improved operations. These strategic objectives focused management on attracting, engaging, developing, and retaining the best associates by maintaining a compelling value proposition in the areas of compensation, leadership, career growth, and meaningful work. The community key leader retention objective applied to the three key positions at our consolidated comparable communities (executive directors, sales directors, and health and wellness/nursing directors). The community associate turnover objective applied to the other positions at our consolidated comparable communities. The corporate associate objective applied to ournon-community-level associates. Each of the objectives were set to pay out at 50% for repeating 2018 performance. Level  Payout     Target / Actual 
 Target/Max    100%   70
 Threshold  25%   68
 Actual  0%   < 68
     
     
 

Community Associate Turnover

  5 Level  Payout     Target  /  Actual 
  Target/Max  100%   48
  Threshold  25%   50
   Actual  0%   > 50
     
     
 

Corporate Associate Retention

  5 Level  Payout     Target  /  Actual 
  Actual  100%   > 83
  Target/Max    100%   80
          Threshold  25%   78

(1)

FOI and CAFCF are financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Appendix A to this Amendment shows how we calculated FOI and CAFCF, including reconciliations to the closest GAAP financial measures.

(2)

The target/max payout levels for the strategic objectives do not reflect application of themove-in multiplier, which would have increased the overall strategic objectives payout by between 10% and 50% had 2019move-in performance been 1% to 5% in excess of the 2019 targeted number ofmove-ins.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

Annual Review and Decisions

For the 2019 compensation program, the Committee resumed its historical practiceabove excludes an aggregate of using a 50/50 grant value mix of time- and performance-based restricted shares for awards to the named executive officers. Based on the Consultant’s market compensation study, the Committee determined that Mses. Baier’s and Patchett’s and Messrs. Swain’s and White’s target long-term equity awards were at the low end, or below, the market ranges identified in the study. Consistent with its compensation philosophy, the Committee increased the target grant values of long-term incentive awards as noted in the table below. After making such changes, each of the named executive officers’ target long-term incentive awards fell within the market ranges shown in the Consultant’s market compensation study, but continued to be below the market medians.

   2019 Grant Value
of Long-Term
Incentive Awards
   Change
v. 2018
   No. of
Time-Based
Restricted
Shares
(50% Weight)
   No. of
Performance-Based
Restricted Shares
(at Target
Performance)
(50% Weight)
 

Ms. Baier

  $4,750,002   6%    302,163    302,163 

Mr. Swain

  $1,300,005   30%    82,698    82,697 

Ms. Patchett

  $900,001   13%    57,252    57,252 

Mr. White

  $450,001   29%    28,626    28,626 

Mr. Kaestner

  $350,006   0%    22,265    22,265 

Time-Based Restricted Shares

The time-based restricted shares are eligible to vest ratably in four annual installments beginning February 27, 2020, subject to continued employment.    

20        


Performance-Based Restricted Shares

Seventy-five percent of the performance-based restricted shares are eligible to vest on February 27, 2022 and twenty-five percent are eligible to vest on February 27, 2023, in each case subject to continued employment and achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. Performance below the threshold level of achievement will result in forfeiture of all shares in the applicable tranche, performance at the targeted level of achievement will result in the vesting of 100% of the applicable tranche, and performance at or above the target level of achievement will result in vesting of up to 125% of the first tranche and up to 150% of the second tranche, with vesting percentages to be interpolated between the levels. The weighting, performance measures, and performance targets for the performance-based restricted shares are outlined below.

Performance Measure

 Weighting  

Description and Link to Strategy

and Business Plan

 Vesting
Date
 Performance Targets 

3-Year CAGR of Same Community RevPAR for 2021 compared to 2018(1)

  75%  Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is a key performance metric utilized by the Board and management to measure both occupancy and rate performance on a monthly basis. This objective focuses our management on delivering long-termtop-line growth through increasing occupancy while maintaining rate discipline. 2/27/2022 Level % of Target
Shares
Vesting
  



3-Year
CAGR of
Same
Community
RevPAR
 
 
 
 
 
   Maximum 125%  4.0% 
   Target 100%  3.5% 
   Threshold 25%  1.5% 
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-Year Relative TSR Compared to S&P Midcap 400 Index Companies(2)

  25%  The relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) objective aligns our management’s priorities with those of our stockholders to establish and achieve long-term goals designed to increase the market value of our common stock relative to the constituent companies of a broad-based comparable index of companies. 2/27/2023 Level % of Target
Shares
Vesting
  
Relative
TSR Rank
 
 
   Maximum 150%  75th %ile 
   Target 100%  50th %ile 
       Threshold 50%  25th %ile 

(1)

Same community RevPAR means the average monthly senior housing resident fee revenues per available unit of the same community portfolio, calculated as resident fee revenues, excluding Health Care Services segment revenue and entrance fee amortization, of the same community portfolio for the applicable fiscal year, divided by the weighted average number of available units in the same community portfolio for the applicable fiscal year, divided by twelve. For purposes of measuring the Company’s performance, principles of revenue recognition will be consistently applied when calculating same community RevPAR.

(2)

3-Year Relative TSR compares our compound annual TSR to the constituent companies of the S&P Midcap 400 index for the period beginning January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2021, assuming reinvestment of dividends or distributions. The award agreement provides that no additional shares beyond the target number of shares will be issued if our compound annual TSR is negative for the performance period.

Other Terms of 2019 Restricted Share Awards

The restricted share agreements associated with the awards described above containnon-competition,non-solicitation,non-disparagement, and confidentiality covenants and set forth the treatment of such awards in connection with termination of employment and a change in control (as described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”). Although we do not currently maintain a dividend program on our common stock, the Committee determined to eliminate the right to receive immediate payment of declared dividends for the 2019 awards. To the extent we declare dividends on our4,349,421 shares of common stock in the future, the restricted shares awarded in 2019 will accrue such dividends to be paid in cash only to the extent the underlying restricted shares ultimately vest.

Other 2019 Decisions

Severance Arrangements for Mr. Kaestner

Mr. Kaestner serves as Executive Vice President–Asset Management and Division President–Entry Fee. On October 1, 2019, we announced that we had entered into definitive agreements with Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (f/k/a HCP, Inc.)

        21


pursuant to which we agreed to, among other things, sell our interests in 16 entry fee continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) held in an unconsolidated venture in which we held a 51% interest, which constitutes our entry fee CCRCs division. In light of our decision to dispose of our interest in the division led by Mr. Kaestner, and to incentivize him to manage the portfolio through the closing of such transactions, the Committee determined to enter into a letter agreement with Mr. Kaestner to amend and supplement the Amended and Restated Tier I Severance Pay Policy (the “Severance Policy”) as it applies to Mr. Kaestner. Under the letter agreement, if we complete the dispositions of our interests in all 16 entry fee CCRCs before January 1, 2021, such completion will be deemed to be a change in control under the Severance Policy if Mr. Kaestner is not offered continued acceptable employment with us or the acquiror of at least a majority of the entry fee CCRCs. An offer of continued acceptable employment means any offer of employment by us or the acquiror accepted by Mr. Kaestner, employment with us with compensation that is not materially and significantly reduced, or employment with the acquiror with responsibilities, duties, and compensation that are not materially and significantly reduced. In addition, we agreed to request that the Committee approve the acceleration and vesting of Mr. Kaestner’s outstanding equity upon consummation of such transactions. If the sale of our interests in all 16 entry fee CCRCs does not occur before January 1, 2021, the Severance Policy will continue to apply to Mr. Kaestner without modification by the 2019 letter agreement. As of April 29, 2020, we continued efforts to complete the sale of two entry fee CCRCs held in an unconsolidated venture with Healthpeak Properties, Inc.

Special Performance Bonuses for Mr. White

During 2019, the Committee determined to pay Mr. White special performance bonuses in the aggregate amount of $40,000 for his service as interim leader of human resources until May 9, 2019, following the departure of the former Chief People Officer on December 31, 2018.

2019 Compensation Results

Summary of Compensation Results

To provide a better understanding of the results of our executive compensation program, the table below sets forth the amount of compensation realized in 2019 by our named executive officers. The value of restricted shares that vested is based on the closing price per share of our stock on the applicable vesting dates. The table excludes the amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table (generally employer matching on our 401(k) plan, employer-paid premiums on life and disability insurance, and the incremental cost to us of relocation expenses).

   Base Salary Earned   Annual Incentive
Opportunity Earned
   Value of Restricted
Shares that Vested
   Special
Performance
Bonus
Earned
   Total
Compensation
Realized
 

Ms. Baier

  $  910,000   $  657,295   $  668,971   $–     $  2,236,266 

Mr. Swain

  $  515,000   $  275,545   $  94,382   $–     $  884,927 

Ms. Patchett

  $  467,750   $  250,264   $  172,439   $–     $  890,453 

Mr. White

  $  397,500   $  148,874   $  82,353   $  40,000   $  668,727 

Mr. Kaestner

  $  344,500   $  129,024   $  90,010   $–     $  563,534 

Although we made significant progress on our operational turnaround strategy during 2019, our performance for the year was below our budgeted expectations. As a result, consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, such

22        


named executive officers’ realized compensation was significantly less than the amounts targeted by the Committee (see “Summary of 2019 Compensation Program” above) and the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019. Such named executive officers earned 53.5% of the target annual incentive opportunity, and the majority of performance-based restricted shares eligible to vest in 2019 were forfeited as a result of failure to achieve the threshold level of performance for the3-year CAGR of Adjusted Cash From Facility Operations (“Adjusted CFFO”) per share measure included in 2016 long-term incentive awards.

Annual Incentive Plan Results

A summary of the achievement and payment to our named executive officers under the 2019 annual incentive plan is provided below. See “2019 Compensation Decisions–Annual Incentive Plan” above for the performance goals and targets, and our actual performance, for each of the financial objectives and strategic objectives.

   Financial Objectives
(60% Weighting)
       Strategic Objectives
(40% Weighting)
       Total 
   Achieved  Payout       Achieved  Payout       Achieved  Payout 

Ms. Baier

  54.4%  $  400,626     52.2%  $  256,669     53.5%  $  657,295 

Mr. Swain

  $  167,947     $  107,598     $  275,545 

Ms. Patchett

  $  152,538     $  97,726     $  250,264 

Mr. White

  $  90,740     $  58,134     $  148,874 

Mr. Kaestner

  $  78,641        $  50,383        $  129,024 

Long-Term Incentive Awards Results

Summary of Vesting and Forfeitures

During 2019, the named executive officers realized the compensation shown in the table below with respect to vesting of restricted shares granted prior to 2019. The value of shares that vested is based on the closing price per share of our stock on the vesting date.

   Vesting of Time-Based
Restricted Shares
Granted in 2015–2018
   Vesting of Performance-Based
Restricted Shares Granted in
2015–2016 (1)
       Total Vesting of Restricted
Shares in 2019
 
   No. of Shares   Value   No. of Shares   Value      No. of Shares   Value 

Ms. Baier

   96,812  $668,971      $        96,812   $668,971

Mr. Swain

   13,312  $94,382      $        13,312   $94,382

Ms. Patchett

   23,653  $  163,442   1,302  $  8,997       24,955   $  172,439

Mr. White

   11,596  $80,217   309  $2,135       11,905   $82,352

Mr. Kaestner

   11,756  $81,234   1,270  $8,776       13,026   $90,010

(1)

Details regarding our performance relative to the applicable performance targets are provided in the section below.

        23


Results of Performance-Based Restricted Shares Eligible to Vest in 2019

During 2019, performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2015 and 2016 were eligible to vest, subject to continued employment and achievement of performance goals established for each award by the Committee. The table below sets forth information regarding the performance goals and targets, our actual results, and the number of shares that vested on February 27, 2019 based on our actual results. The value of shares that vested is included in the summary table above and is based on the closing price per share of our stock on the vesting date. Performance below the threshold level of achievement would have resulted in forfeiture of all shares in the applicable tranche, achievement of the targeted level of performance (or above) would have resulted in the vesting of 100% of the applicable tranche, and vesting percentages were to be interpolated between the steps shown in the table below.

 Award
 Year
 

Performance

Goal

 % of Shares
Eligible to Vest
 Targets Actual
Results
 Percent
that
Vested
       No. and Value of
Shares that Vested (1)
 
 

 

 2015

 

 

2018 Return on Investment (“ROI”) on Program Max Projects approved in 2015 and completed prior to the end of 2016(2)

 

100% (Target/Max)

20% (Threshold)

 

³12%

8%

 >14% 100%            
 

 

Ms. Patchett

 

 

 

 

1,302

 

 

 

 

$

 

  8,997

 

 

 

 

Mr. White

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

 

$

 

  2,135

 

 

 

 

Mr. Kaestner

 

 

 

 

    1,270

 

 

 

 

$

 

  8,776

 

 

              
 
 2016 

 

3-Year CAGR of Adjusted CFFO per Share comparing 2018 results versus a 2015 base year(3)

 

 

100% (Target/Max)

20% (Threshold)

 

³8%

4%

 <0% 0%            
 

 

Ms. Baier

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Patchett

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. White

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

  

 

Mr. Kaestner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

              

(1)

With respect to the 2016 awards eligible to vest on February 27, 2019, the following number of shares were forfeited as a result of failure to achieve the threshold level of performance: Ms. Baier–38,820 shares; Ms. Patchett–18,245 shares; Mr. White–2,211 shares; and Mr. Kaestner–9,057 shares.

(2)

Program Max is our development capital expenditures initiative through which we expand, renovate, reposition, or redevelop selected existing senior living communities where economically advantageous.

(3)

Adjusted CFFO per share was defined as Adjusted Cash From Facility Operations per share as reported by the Company, excluding federal income taxes to the extent we had become a federal income taxpayer during the performance period.

24        


Status of Outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Shares Granted in Prior Years

As of December 31, 2019, the named executive officers held the number of performance-based restricted shares awarded in prior years as outlined in the table below. Vesting of the performance-based restricted shares is subject to continued employment and achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. The table below sets forth information regarding the performance goals and targets and the number of shares subject to such awards. Performance below the threshold level of achievement has resulted or will result in forfeiture of all shares in the applicable tranche, achievement of the targeted level of performance (or above) has resulted or will result in the vesting of 100% of the applicable tranche, and vesting percentages will be interpolated between the steps shown in the table below.

 Award 
Year
 Vesting
Date
  Performance Goal % of Shares
Eligible to Vest
 Targets     

Shares at Target

 
 
 2016  2/27/2020  

 

2019 ROI on Program Max Projects approved in 2016 and completed prior to the end of 2017 or approved prior to 2016 and completed during 2017(1)

 

100% (Target/Max)

 

20% (Threshold)

 

³ 12%

 

8%

       Ms. Baier  12,940  
   Ms. Patchett  6,082  
   Mr. White  737  
   Mr. Kaestner  3,020  
 
2017  2/27/2020  3-Year CAGR of CAFCF comparing 2019 results versus a 2016 base year(2) 

 

100% (Target/Max)

 

80%

 

60%

 

40%

 

20% (Threshold)

 

 

³ 23.1%

 

14.3%

 

11.8%

 

9.3%

 

3.8%

   

 

Ms. Baier

 

 

 

 

37,904 

 

 

   Ms. Patchett  17,814  
   Mr. White  2,158  
   Mr. Kaestner  8,844  
  2/27/2021  

 

2020 ROI on Program Max Projects approved in 2017 and completed prior to the end of 2018 or approved prior to 2017 and completed during 2018

 

100% (Target/Max)

 

60%

 

20% (Threshold)

 

³ 11.0%

 

9.0%

 

8.0%

   Ms. Baier  12,635  
   Ms. Patchett  5,939  
   Mr. White  720  
   Mr. Kaestner  2,948  
 
2018  2/27/2021  

 

Compound annual TSR, comparing our share price of $6.53 to the volume-weighted average price for the 15 trading days ending December 31, 2020 (3)

 

100% (Target/Max)

 

75%

 

50% (Threshold)

 

³ 23.91%

 

20.17%

 

16.20%

   Ms. Baier  207,469  
   

 

Mr. Swain

 

 

 

 

53,248 

 

 

    
    
          

(1)

Based on our actual ROI results of 13.6% for the year ended December 31, 2019, all of the shares awarded in 2016 and eligible to vest on February 27, 2020 vested at target/maximum.

(2)

Based on our actual CAGR results of less than 3.8% for the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, all of the shares awarded in 2017 and eligible to vest on February 27, 2020 were forfeited. For purposes of these performance-based restricted shares, CAFCF is defined as the sum of our Adjusted Free Cash Flow and our proportionate share of Adjusted Free Cash Flow of unconsolidated ventures, in each case as reported by the Company, excluding transaction, transaction-related, and severance costs and federal income taxes to the extent we had become a federal income taxpayer during the performance period.

(3)

Compound annual TSR is calculated assuming reinvestment in our common stock of any dividends or distributions paid during the period. The $6.53 beginning share price represents our closing price per share on February 28, 2018, the date that Ms. Baier became President and Chief Executive Officer.

        25


Other Compensation Policies

Annual Risk Assessment

In accordance with its charter, the Committee conducts an assessment annually of the relationship between our risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy, and our compensation arrangements. As part of this assessment, the Committee evaluates whether any incentive and other forms of pay encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. For our 2019 executive compensation program, the Committee concluded that the program, including the performance goals and targets used for incentive compensation, is appropriately structured not to encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking, and that any risks arising from the program are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

Our stock ownership and retention guidelines are applicable to certain of our officers, including our named executive officers, and are intended to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. Our named executive officers are expected to hold a number of shares with a minimum market value expressed as a

Multiple of Base Salary     

Chief Executive Officer

5.0x

Chief Financial Officer

4.0x

Executive Vice Presidents                                                 

3.0x

multiple of their base salary as shown in the table below. Unvested equity awards do not count toward the expected level of ownership, except that the estimated number ofafter-tax time-based restricted shares scheduled to vest within 90 days may be counted towards compliance. The expected level of ownership must be achieved by the fifth anniversary of such officer’s becoming subject to the guidelines. Until the expected ownership level is achieved, each officer is expected to retain at least 50% ofafter-tax shares obtained through our equity compensation plans. This retention requirement also applies in situations where an officer has achieved the expected stock ownership level but changes in the market price of our stock or the officer’s base salary result in such officer’s failure to maintain the expected stock ownership level. All of our current named executive officers are in compliance with our stock ownership and retention guidelines and will be expected to retain at least 50% of theirafter-tax shares obtained through our equity compensation plans until they meet their applicable required holdings.

Policy on Derivatives, Hedging and Pledging

Our insider trading policy provides that no one subject to the policy, which includes all our directors, officers, employees and their immediate family members and controlled entities, may engage in short sales, puts, calls or other derivative transactions, or in any hedging or monetization transactions (i.e., prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), involving our securities. It also provides that our directors and officers may not pledge our securities as collateral for a loan, or hold our securities in a margin account.

Clawback Policies

In February 2020, the Committee adopted a Clawback and Forfeiture Policy, which applies to our current and former officers as defined in Rule16a-1 of the Exchange Act. By its terms, the policy will apply to all short-term and long-term cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid, earned, vested, or otherwise awarded based on performance measures, beginning with the 2020 annual incentive plan and the performance-basedunvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) awarded to such officers in February 2020. The policy provides that in the event of any material financial restatement of our reported consolidated financial statements, or that the Committee otherwise determines that a financial metric used to determine the vesting or payment of any such performance-based compensation was calculated incorrectly in any material respect, the Committee, in its discretion, may require reimbursement of an amount equal to all or a portion of such performance-based compensation previously vested or paid for any

26        


performance periods which include any of the three full fiscal years immediately preceding the announcement of any financial restatement or the determination of any inaccuracy regarding calculation of a financial metric. The amount of the recoupment will be determined by the Committee in its discretion, up to the amount of such performance-based compensation previously paid or vested with respect to such officer that is in excess of the performance-based compensation that would have been received based on the correct financial metric or restated results. To the extent the Committee determines that any such amount should be recouped, the Committee may seek recovery by, among other things, requiring reimbursement of performance-based compensation previously paid, canceling or rescindingwere outstanding equity awards, adjusting or withholding unpaid compensation, or setting off against future grants of equity-based awards.

In February 2020, the Board adopted an amendment tounder our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan that provides that any award thereunder shall be subject to forfeiture, reduction, or recoupment to the extent provided in our Clawback and Forfeiture Policy or any other future recoupment or clawback policy adopted by us. Awards thereunder continue to be subject to forfeiture, reduction, or recoupment to the extent we adopt a policy to comply with the requirements of any applicable laws, rules, regulations, or stock exchange listing requirements, including pursuant to final SEC rules under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and to the extent provided under applicable legal requirements which impose recoupment, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The RSU award agreements used in connection with the February 2020 awards to the named executive officers provide that in the event of a breach by the named executive officer of thenon-competition,non-solicitation,non-disparagement, or confidentiality covenants contained in the agreements, we will have the authority to cancel all such outstanding RSUs, cancel all shares of stock beneficially owned by the named executive officer that were issued in settlement of the RSUs within 12 months on or prior to, or at any time after, the termination of the named executive officer’s employment, and recoup from the named executive officer any proceeds from such officer’s sale, transfer, or other disposition of any such cancellable shares.

To the extent the named executive officers are eligible to receive severance pay and benefits under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement and the Severance Policy, as applicable, such agreement and policy provide that any breach of a restrictive covenant applicable to the named executive officer will result in the immediate and permanent cessation of payment of severance pay and benefits, the obligation of the named executive officer to repay to us upon our demand 90% of the amount or cost of such severance pay and benefits, and the obligation of the named executive officer to pay our costs and expenses to enforce such obligation.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount that a company may deduct in any one year with respect to compensation paid to any “covered employee.” Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017, Section 162(m) provided an exemption from this deduction limitation for compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation.” However, the exemption for performance-based compensation was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to transition relief for certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. These and other changes cause more elements of our compensation to benon-deductible under Section 162(m) and eliminated the Company’s ability to structure performance-based awards to be exempt from Section 162(m). While the Committee will continue to consider tax implications in making compensation decisions, the Committee will not necessarily limit executive compensation to that which is or may be deductible under Section 162(m). The Committee believes that the interests of our stockholders are best served if it maintains flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals even though some compensation awards may result innon-deductible compensation expense. In making decisions about executive compensation, the Committee also considers the impact of other tax laws, including Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code regardingnon-qualified deferred compensation and Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code regarding compensation in connection with a change in control.

        27


 Employment Agreement and Severance Policies Applicable to Named Executive Officers

We are party to an employment agreement dated March 1, 2018 with Ms. Baier, which we entered into in connection with her promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer effective February 28, 2018. The employment agreement has a three year term, subject to automatic extensions for additional one year periods, unless either we or Ms. Baier gives written notice to the other party no less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term that the term will not be extended. Ms. Baier’s initial base salary was $825,000 per year, which may not be reduced without Ms. Baier’s approval. In addition, Ms. Baier is eligible to receive an annual cash incentive opportunity with a target of at least 125% of base salary paid during the calendar year, subject to the terms of our annual incentive plan for senior executive officers. Ms. Baier is eligible to participate in various benefit plans that we make available to our senior executive officers (other than our severance policies). In addition, we will provide Ms. Baier with basic term life insurance benefits of at least 100% of her base salary at no cost to Ms. Baier. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Baier is entitled to severance payments if her employment is terminated by us without cause or by her for good reason. Severance payments in connection with a change in control are “double trigger,” which requires the occurrence of a change in control followed by termination of employment within 18 months of the change in control by us without cause or by Ms. Baier for good reason. Under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement, any payments that are not deductible by us under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code will be cut back only to the extent that the cutback results in a betterafter-tax position for Ms. Baier. The employment agreement containsnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, and mutualnon-disparagement covenants. Thenon-competition restrictions will continue in effect during Ms. Baier’s employment and for one year following termination of employment. Thenon-solicitation restrictions will continue in effect during her employment and for two years following her termination of employment. The confidentiality and mutualnon-disparagement obligations will apply during her employment and thereafter.

Our other named executive officers do not have employment agreements, but are eligible to participate in the Severance Policy. Ms. Patchett participates in the Severance Policy as a “Designated Officer” as defined therein, and each of Messrs. Swain, White, and Kaestner participates in the Severance Policy as a “Selected Officer” as defined therein. Mr. Kaestner is also party to separate letter agreements with us dated effective as of August 6, 2010 and September 25, 2019, which provide for certain modifications of the Severance Policy as it applies to Mr. Kaestner. Under the Severance Policy, the participating named executive officers are entitled to severance payments if their employment is terminated by us without cause (or by Mr. Kaestner for good reason) or, following a change in control, by the executive for good reason. The severance payments under the Severance Policy applicable in connection with a change in control are “double trigger,” which require the occurrence of a change in control followed by termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive for good reason. If payments pursuant to the Severance Policy and other arrangements are not deductible by us under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments shall be reduced (or repaid) in order to ensure our deduction of payments in connection with a change in control.

A detailed description of potential severance payments pursuant to the foregoing employment agreement and the Severance Policy, as well as the effect of certain terminations and a change in control pursuant to outstanding equity award agreements, is set forth under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

2020 Compensation Decisions

When making annual compensation decisions for 2020, the Committee conducted a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program similar to the review conducted for 2019 annual compensation decisions. With respect to market compensation practices, the Consultant reviewed our compensation peer group and recommended that it be updated to replace LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., Magellan Health, Inc., and Wyndham Destinations with LHC Group, Inc., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and

28        


Chemed Corporation to reflect mergers and acquisitions activity and to more closely align the median levels of financial metrics and number of employees of the peer group with ours.

The Consultant also completed a market compensation study. The Committee, as advised by the Consultant, considered target total direct compensation within a range of +/- 20% of median as reported in the Consultant’s study to be competitive. The Committee found that Ms. Baier’s target total direct compensation was slightly below the market median, and that Messrs. Swain’s and White’s base salaries, target total cash compensation, target long-term equity awards, and target total direct compensation were at the low end, or below, the median market ranges. Following completion of its review, the Committee approved the principal elements of compensation of our named executive officers for 2020 as summarized in the table below. With the 2020 changes, the elements of Messrs. Swain’s and White’s compensation fell within the market ranges shown in the market compensation study, but continued to be below the market medians.

  2020 Base
Salary
  Change v.
2019
  2020 Target
Annual
Incentive
Opportunity
  Change v.
2019
  

 

2020 Grant
Value of
Long-Term
Incentive
Awards (1)

  Change v.
2019 (1)
  2020 Target
Total Direct
Compensation
  Change v.
2019
 

 

 Ms. Baier

 

 

 

 

$   938,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

135%

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  4,900,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$    7,104,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 Mr. Swain

 

 

 

 

$   575,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

12%

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,700,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

31%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$    2,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

22%

 

 

 

 Ms. Patchett

 

 

 

 

$   467,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     900,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$    1,835,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 Mr. White

 

 

 

 

$   425,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     550,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

22%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$    1,272,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

13%

 

 

 

 Mr. Kaestner

 

 

 

 

$   355,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     350,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

–%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$       953,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

2%

 

 

(1)

The dollar amount of the 2020 long-term incentive awards, and the percentage change versus 2019, is based on the grant value of such awards (i.e., number of restricted stock units granted at target performance, multiplied by the stock price on the date of grant).

The 2020 annual incentive plan, as approved by the Committee, continues to be based on company financial objectives and strategic objectives weighted consistently with 2019, with the target levels of performance generally reflective of our 2020 budget approved by the Board at the beginning of 2020. The performance objectives are generally consistent with the 2019 annual incentive opportunity, except a quality measure will be used in lieu of theNPS-related objectives. The Committee is assessing the performance objectives and targets of the 2020 annual incentive plan in light of theCOVID-19 pandemic.

For the 2020 long-term incentive awards, a 50/50 grant value mix of time- and performance-based equity was used for the named executive officers, consistent with the 2019 program. The performance objectives for the performance-based equity awards continue to be weighted at 75% using the3-year CAGR of same community RevPAR objective and 25% using the3-year relative TSR objective. The Committee determined to utilize restricted stock units for the 2020 program on substantially the same terms as the 2019 restricted share awards, except that the 2020 awards no longer provide for partial single-trigger acceleration of equity upon a change in control unless the awards are not assumed, continued, or substituted with an award relating to a publicly-traded security of the acquiror (or the Company) on the same terms and conditions that were applicable to the outstanding awards immediately prior to the change in control, in which case such awards would vest and be settled upon the change in control.

        29


Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the disclosure set forth above under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management and, based on the review and discussions, it has recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included herein.

Respectfully submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board,

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Frank M. Bumstead, Chairman

Victoria L. Freed

Denise W. Warren

30        


Summary Compensation Table for 2019

The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by, awarded to, or paid to our named executive officers for the periods indicated.

 Name and Principal Position (1)

 

 

Year

 

  

Salary
($)

 

  

Bonus
($) (2)

 

  

Stock
Awards
($) (3)

 

  

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (4)

 

  

All Other
Compensation
($) (5)

 

  

    Total    

($)

 

 

 

Lucinda M. Baier

President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

910,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,773,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

657,295

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,350,901

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

782,248

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

3,551,872

 

 

 

281,023

 

 

 

9,112

 

 

 

4,674,255

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,013

 

 

 

196,150

 

 

 

161,025

 

 

 

2,407,188

 

 

Steven E. Swain

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

515,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,306,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

275,545

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,117,449

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

161,538

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

802,324

 

 

 

46,038

 

 

 

162,235

 

 

 

1,272,135

 

                            

Mary Sue Patchett

Executive Vice President,

Strategic Operations

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

467,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

904,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

250,264

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,631,489

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

437,750

 

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

800,004

 

 

 

62,905

 

 

 

7,783

 

 

 

1,758,442

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

425,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

705,004

 

 

 

134,995

 

 

 

7,026

 

 

 

1,272,025

 

 

Chad C. White

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary  

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

397,500

 

350,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,000

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

452,219

 

350,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

148,874

 

81,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,807

 

7,198

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,046,400

 

1,088,604

 

 

 

 

 

H. Todd Kaestner

Executive Vice President

Asset Management and

Division President–Entry Fee

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

344,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

351,731

 

 

 

 

 

 

129,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

834,389

 

 

(1)

The named executive officers served in the positions noted in the table at all times during the years presented, except that: Ms. Baier served as Chief Financial Officer until being appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective February 28, 2018; Mr. Swain joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective September 4, 2018; Ms. Patchett previously served as Executive Vice President–Community Operations until March 23, 2020, and Mr. Kaestner previously served as Executive Vice President–Corporate Development until June 30, 2019.

(2)

The 2019 amount for Mr. White consists of special performance bonuses paid to Mr. White for his service as interim leader of human resources until May 9, 2019 following the departure of the former Chief People Officer on December 31, 2018.

(3)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of time- and performance-based restricted shares computed in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Original Filing for a summary of the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards. See footnotes 2 and 3 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for the grant values of performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2019 assuming maximum levels of performance.

(4)

Represents the payout of each named executive officer’s annual cash incentive opportunity with respect to performance in the applicable year.

(5)

For each of the named executive officers, the 2019 amount includes the employer matching contribution to our 401(k) Plan and premiums on Company-provided life and disability insurance. For Mr. Swain, the 2019 amount also includes the incremental cost to the Company of $12,457 for relocation assistance provided to Mr. Swain, including associated tax gross ups of $4,902.

        31


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers in 2019. To the extent we declare dividends on our shares of common stock, the restricted shares awarded in 2019 will accrue such dividends to be paid in cash only to the extent the underlying restricted shares ultimately vest.

Name

 

Grant Date

  

 

Estimated Possible Payouts

UnderNon-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

     

 

Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

  

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)

  

Grant
Date

Fair

Value of
Stock
Awards

($)

 
 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

     

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

 

 

Ms. Baier

 

 

 

 

 

–  (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

307,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,228,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,211,300

 

 

 

 

      
 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (2)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

56,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

226,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

283,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,781,249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (3)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

37,770

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,541

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

617,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (4)

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

302,163

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,375,001

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Swain

 

 

 

 

 

–  (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

128,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

515,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

927,000

 

 

 

 

      
 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (2)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

15,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

487,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (3)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

10,337

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

168,907

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (4)

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

650,006

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Patchett

 

 

 

 

 

–  (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,938

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

467,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

841,950

 

 

 

 

      
 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (2)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

10,735

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

337,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (3)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

7,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,469

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (4)

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,001

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. White

 

 

 

 

 

–  (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,563

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

278,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,850

 

 

 

 

      
 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (2)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

5,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,837

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

168,754

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (3)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

3,578

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,734

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (4)

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,000

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Kaestner

 

 

 

 

 

–  (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

241,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

434,070

 

 

 

 

      
 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (2)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

4,175

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (3)

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

2,783

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,474

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2019  (4)

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175,003

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts represent the threshold, target, and maximum payout levels under our 2019 annual incentive plan. The actual payouts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table asNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the following amounts: Ms. Baier–$657,295; Mr. Swain–$275,545; Ms. Patchett–$250,264; Mr. White–$148,874; and Mr. Kaestner–$129,024.

(2)

Represents performance-based restricted shares granted under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan which are eligible to vest on February 27, 2022, subject to continued employment and the achievement of3-year CAGR of same community RevPAR performance targets as described above. The values reported in the table represent the grant date fair values computed in accordance with ASC 718, which are equivalent to the grant values (i.e., number of shares granted at target performance level, multiplied by the closing price on the date of grant). Achievement at the threshold, target, and maximum or above performance levels will result in vesting of 25%, 100%, and 125% of the target number of shares, respectively, and vesting percentages will be interpolated between threshold and target, and target and maximum performance levels. Failure to achieve the threshold

32        


performance level will result in forfeiture of all such shares. The grant values of the awards (i.e., number of shares granted multiplied by the closing price on the date of grant) assuming achievement at or above the maximum performance level are: Ms. Baier–$2,226,557; Mr. Swain–$609,370; Ms. Patchett–$421,870; Mr. White–$210,939; and Mr. Kaestner–$164,062.

(3)

Represents performance-based restricted shares granted under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan which are eligible to vest on February 27, 2023, subject to continued employment and the achievement of3-year relative TSR performance targets as described above. The values reported in the table represent the grant date fair values computed in accordance with ASC 718, which were 4% more than the grant values (i.e., number of shares granted at target performance level, multiplied by the closing price on the date of grant). Achievement at the threshold, target, and maximum or above performance levels will result in vesting of 50%, 100%, and 150% of the target number of shares, respectively (provided that no additional shares beyond the target number of shares will be issued if our compound annual TSR is negative for the performance period), and vesting percentages will be interpolated between threshold and target, and target and maximum performance levels. Failure to achieve the threshold performance level will result in forfeiture of all such shares. The grant values of the awards (i.e., number of shares granted multiplied by the closing price on the date of grant) assuming achievement at or above the maximum performance level are: Ms. Baier–$890,624; Mr. Swain–$243,746; Ms. Patchett–$168,746; Mr. White–$84,369; and Mr. Kaestner–$65,623.

(4)

Represents time-based restricted shares granted under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan which are eligible to vest ratably in four annual installments beginning on February 27, 2020, subject to continued employment.

        33


Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2019. The market values of such2020. Our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan allows awards are based on $7.27 per share, the closing market price of our stock on December 31, 2019.

     Stock Awards 

Name

 Grant Date  Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#) (1)
  Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested ($)
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units
or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested ($)
 

Ms. Baier

 

  

 

2/26/2016

 

 

 

  

 

12,940

 

 

 

  

 

94,074

 

 

 

  

 

12,940  (2)

 

 

 

  

 

94,074

 

 

 

  

 

2/13/2017

 

 

 

  

 

25,270

 

 

 

  

 

183,713

 

 

 

  

 

20,215  (3)

 

 

 

  

 

146,963

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

77,479

 

 

 

  

 

563,272

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

58,110

 

 

 

  

 

422,460

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

3/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

155,602

 

 

 

  

 

1,131,227

 

 

 

  

 

103,735  (4)

 

 

 

  

 

754,150

 

 

 

  

 

2/11/2019

 

 

 

  

 

302,163

 

 

 

  

 

2,196,725

 

 

 

  

 

264,392  (5)

 

 

 

  

 

1,992,130

 

 

 

Mr. Swain

 

  

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

  

 

39,937

 

 

 

  

 

290,342

 

 

 

  

 

26,624  (4)

 

 

 

  

 

193,556

 

 

 

  

 

2/11/2019

 

 

 

  

 

82,698

 

 

 

  

 

601,214

 

 

 

  

 

72,360  (5)

 

 

 

  

 

526,057

 

 

 

Ms. Patchett

 

  

 

2/26/2016

 

 

 

  

 

6,082

 

 

 

  

 

44,216

 

 

 

  

 

6,082  (2)

 

 

 

  

 

44,216

 

 

 

  

 

2/13/2017

 

 

 

  

 

11,877

 

 

 

  

 

86,346

 

 

 

  

 

9,501  (3)

 

 

 

  

 

69,072

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

41,322

 

 

 

  

 

300,411

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

30,993

 

 

 

  

 

225,319

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

2/11/2019

 

 

 

  

 

57,252

 

 

 

  

 

416,222

 

 

 

  

 

50,095  (5)

 

 

 

  

 

364,191

 

 

 

Mr. White

 

  

 

2/26/2016

 

 

 

  

 

2,212

 

 

 

  

 

16,081

 

 

 

  

 

737  (2)

 

 

 

  

 

5,358

 

 

 

  

 

2/13/2017

 

 

 

  

 

4,319

 

 

 

  

 

31,399

 

 

 

  

 

1,151  (3)

 

 

 

  

 

8,368

 

 

 

  

 

5/4/2017

 

 

 

  

 

1,780

 

 

 

  

 

12,941

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

18,079

 

 

 

  

 

131,434

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

13,560

 

 

 

  

 

98,581

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

2/11/2019

 

 

 

  

 

28,626

 

 

 

  

 

208,111

 

 

 

  

 

25,048  (5)

 

 

 

  

 

182,099

 

 

 

Mr. Kaestner

 

  

 

2/26/2016

 

 

 

  

 

3,020

 

 

 

  

 

21,955

 

 

 

  

 

3,020  (2)

 

 

 

  

 

21,955

 

 

 

  

 

2/13/2017

 

 

 

  

 

5,897

 

 

 

  

 

42,871

 

 

 

  

 

4,717  (3)

 

 

 

  

 

34,293

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

18,079

 

 

 

  

 

131,434

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1/5/2018

 

 

 

  

 

13,560

 

 

 

  

 

98,581

 

 

 

  

 

–      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

2/11/2019

 

 

 

  

 

22,265

 

 

 

  

 

161,867

 

 

 

  

 

19,482  (5)

 

 

 

  

 

141,634

 

 

 

(1)

Representstime-based restricted shares, the vesting of which is subject to continued employment. The awards granted during January, February, March, and September have vested or are eligible to vest ratably in four annual installments beginning on February 27 (November 19 for Mr. Swain’s September 2018 award) in the year following the year of grant, except that with respect to the second award with a grant date of January 5, 2018, 75% of the award is eligible to vest on February 27, 2021 and 25% of the award is eligible vest on February 27, 2022. The award granted during May 2017 vested ratably in three annual installments beginning on May 20 in the year following the year of grant.

(2)

Represents performance-based restricted shares, the vesting of which was subject to continued employment and the achievement of specified performance targets based on our 2019 ROI on Program Max projects as described above. The number of shares reported represents the target level of performance, and such reported shares vested on February 27, 2020 based on our actual performance.

(3)

Represents performance-based restricted shares, the vesting of which is subject to continued employment and the achievement of specified performance targets. Up to 75% of the shares awarded were eligible to vest on February 27, 2020 based on our3-year CAGR of Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow, and up to 25% of the shares awarded are eligible to vest on February 27, 2021 based on our 2020 ROI on Program Max projects, each as described above. The number of shares reported represents the threshold level of performance for the first tranche and the target level of performance for the second tranche. The threshold level of performance for the first tranche was not achieved; therefore, the named executive officers forfeited the following number of shares on February 27, 2019: Ms. Baier–37,904 shares; Ms. Patchett–17,814 shares; Mr. White–2,158 shares; and Mr. Kaestner–8,844 shares.

34        


(4)

Represents performance-based restricted shares, which are eligible to vest on February 27, 2021, subject to continued employment and the achievement of compound annual TSR performance targets based on a beginning stock price of $6.53 per share as described above. The number of shares reported represents the threshold level of performance.

(5)

Represents performance-based restricted shares with the terms described in footnotes 2 and 3 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The number of shares reported represents the target level of performance with respect to the shares eligible to vest on February 27, 2022 based on our3-year CAGR of same community RevPAR performance, and the threshold level of performance with respect to the shares eligible to vest on February 27, 2023 based on our3-year relative TSR performance.

Stock Vested for 2019

The following table summarizes the vesting of time- and performance-based restricted shares and the value realized by our named executive officers as a result of such vesting during 2019.

   Stock Awards 
   Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)   Value Realized on Vesting ($) (1) 
  Ms. Baier   96,812    668,971 
  Mr. Swain   13,312    94,382 
  Ms. Patchett   24,955    172,439 
  Mr. White   11,905    82,353 
  Mr. Kaestner   13,026    90,010 

(1)

The value realized is based on the closing market price of the underlying stock on the date the shares vested (or the most recent trading day if such date was not a trading day): February 27, 2019 (Ms. Baier–96,812 shares; Ms. Patchett–24,955 shares; Mr. White–10,125 shares; and Mr. Kaestner–13,026 shares); May 20, 2019 (Mr. White–1,780 shares); and November 19, 2019 (Mr. Swain–13,312 shares).

Pension Benefits

None of our named executive officers participates in or has account balances in qualified ornon-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us. The Committee may elect to adopt qualified ornon-qualified defined benefit plansbe made in the future if it determines that doing so is in our best interests.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Noneform of our named executive officers participates in or has an accrued benefit innon-qualified defined contribution plans or othernon-qualified deferred compensation plans maintained by us. The Committee may elect to adoptnon-qualified defined contribution plans or othernon-qualified deferred compensation plans in the future if it determines that doing so is in our best interests.

        35


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table sets forth potential amounts payable upon termination of employment or a change in control to our named executive officers assuming termination of employment on December 31, 2019, with equity-based amounts based on $7.27 per share, the closing market price of our stock on December 31, 2019.

Name/Benefit

 Voluntary
Resignation by
Executive
($)
  Termination
by us for
Cause
($)
  Termination
by us without
Cause
($)
  

 

Termination
by us without
Cause
following a
Change in
Control
($)

  Termination
by Executive
for Good
Reason
($)
  Disability
($)
  Death
($)
 

 

Ms. Baier

       

Salary

        1,365,000   1,820,000   1,365,000       

Pro-Rata Bonus(1)

        657,295   657,295   657,295   657,295   657,295 

Severance Bonus

        1,842,750   2,457,000   1,842,750       

PTO

  70,000   70,000   70,000   70,000   70,000   70,000  70,000

COBRA

        15,219   15,219   15,219       

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Shares  (2)

        1,628,705   8,757,987   926,249   1,628,705  1,628,705

Total

 

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

  70,000  5,578,969   13,777,501   4,876,513   2,356,000   2,356,000 

Mr. Swain

       

Salary

        515,000   772,500          

Pro-Rata Bonus(1)

        275,545   275,545      275,545  275,545 

Severance Bonus

        515,000   772,500          

PTO

  26,711  26,711  26,711  26,711  26,711  26,711  26,711

COBRA

        8,285   12,427          

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Shares  (2)

        247,078   1,879,877      247,078   247,078 

Total

 

 

 

 

26,711

 

 

  26,711   1,587,619   3,739,560   26,711   549,334   549,334 

Ms. Patchett

       

Salary

        701,625   935,500          

Pro-Rata Bonus(1)

        250,264   250,264      250,264  250,264 

Severance Bonus

        701,625   935,500          

PTO

  35,981  35,981   35,981   35,981   35,981  35,981  35,981 

COBRA

        14,900   14,900          

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Shares  (2)

        460,962   1,705,637      460,962  460,962

Total

 

 

 

 

35,981

 

  35,981   2,165,357   3,877,782   35,981  724,207   747,207 

Mr. White

       

Salary

        397,500   596,250          

Pro-Rata Bonus  (1)

        148,874   148,874      148,874   148,874 

Severance Bonus

        278,250   417,375          

PTO

  30,578  30,578  30,578   30,578   30,578  30,578   30,578

COBRA

                     

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Shares  (2)

        200,674   732,940      200,674   200,674 

Total

 

 

 

 

30,578

 

  30,578  1,055,876   1,926,017   30,578  380,126   380,126 

Mr. Kaestner

       

Salary

        344,500   516,750   344,500       

Pro-Rata Bonus  (1)

        129,024   129,024      129,024   129,024 

36        


Name/Benefit

 Voluntary
Resignation by
Executive
($)
  Termination
by us for
Cause
($)
  Termination
by us without
Cause
($)
  

 

Termination
by us without
Cause
following a
Change in
Control
($)

  Termination
by Executive
for Good
Reason
($)
  Disability
($)
  Death
($)
 

Severance Bonus

        241,150   361,725   180,863      

PTO

  26,501  26,501  26,501   26,501   26,501  26,501  26,501

COBRA

        13,828   20,742   13,828      

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Shares  (2)

        204,382   726,258      204,382  204,382

Total

 

 

 

 

26,501

 

 

  26,501  959,385   1,781,000   565,692  359,907   359,907 

(1)

The amounts listed in the applicable columns represent the amount payable to the named executive officer under the 2019 annual incentive plan based on our actual performance in 2019.

(2)

A portion of the amounts listed in the applicable columns relate to the potential vesting of performance-basedoptions, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, following a termination of the executive’s employment by us without cause (other than in connection with a change in control), as a result of the executive’s death or disability and, with respect to grants made to Ms. Baier on or after March 1, 2018, upon her termination of employment for good reason (other than in connection with a change in control). As described in more detail below, upon each of these events, all or a portion of outstanding performance-based restricted shares would remain outstanding an eligible to vest only if and to the extent the relevant performance targets were achieved. The amounts in the applicable columns in respect of the potential vesting of these performance-based restricted shares include the performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2016 that vested on February 27, 2020 and consist of $94,074 for Ms. Baier, $44,216 for Ms. Patchett, $5,358 for Mr. White, and $21,955 for Mr. Kaestner. The remainder of the applicable amounts consist of the accelerated vesting of time-based restricted shares, and in the column under the heading “Termination by us without Cause following a Change in Control,” additional vesting of performance-based restricted shares, each as described in more detail below.

Severance Arrangements

Our employment agreement with Ms. Baier and the Severance Policy provide for severance payments and benefits for certain terminations of employment of our named executive officers. In addition, equity award agreements with the named executive officers provide for the treatment of outstanding restricted shares and restricted stock units, upon certain terminations of employment. Summaries of such arrangements are set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated, “cause,” “good reason”unrestricted shares, performance awards, and “change in control” are defined in the employment agreement or Severance Policy, as applicable, or with respect to the outstanding equity award agreements, our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan. In addition to the severance pay and benefits described below, upon any termination of a named executive officer’s employment, the executive will be entitled to receive a payout of up to 160 hours of the executive’s paid time off (PTO) balance, and upon termination of a named executive officer’s employment due to death or disability, our 2019 annual incentive plan and Ms. Baier’s employment agreement provide that the annual bonus will be paid to the extend earned,pro-rated based on the number of days employed during the year.

Employment Agreement

Under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement, in the event her employment is terminated by us without cause or by Ms. Baier for good reason, in each case other than within 18 months following a change in control, she will be entitled to: (i) 150% of her base salary and target annual bonus for the year of termination, payable over 18 months; (ii) an annual bonus for the year of termination (to the extent earned under the terms of the bonus plan),pro-rated based on the number of days she was employed, and (iii) if then eligible for, and she elects continuation of health coverage under COBRA, we will pay the employer portion of her COBRA premium payments for 18 months as if she were still an active employee (the “COBRA Benefits”).

In the event Ms. Baier’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Ms. Baier for good reason, in each case within 18 months following a change in control, she will be entitled to: (i) 200% of her base salary payable over 18 months, (ii) 200% of her target bonus for the year of termination paid in a lump sum on the 60th day following such termination; (iii) an annual bonus for the year of termination (to the extent earned under the terms of the bonus plan),pro-rated based on the number of days she was employed, and (iv) the COBRA Benefits for 18 months.

        37
stock-based awards.

134

If Ms. Baier’s employment is terminated by reason of her death or “disability” (as defined in the employment agreement), she (or her beneficiary or estate, as applicable) will be entitled to receive an annual bonus for the year of termination (to the extent earned under the terms of the bonus plan),pro-rated based on the number of days she was employed.

Payments of such severance pay and benefits under the employment agreement are conditioned on Ms. Baier having signed and returned an effective waiver and release of claims in a form satisfactory to us and continuing to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants. She must acknowledge in such release that all restrictive covenants to which she is a party will remain in force for the period specified in such covenants. A breach of such covenants will result in the cessation of severance pay and benefits and may result in her being required to repay certain severance pay and benefits already provided as well as certain costs and expenses.

Termination of Ms. Baier’s employment within 30 days of the end of the initial term or any renewal term of the employment agreement following the provision of written notice ofnon-renewal by us will be treated as a termination of Ms. Baier’s employment without cause for purposes of the employment agreement and for purposes of any equity awards previously granted to Ms. Baier or granted to her during the term of the employment agreement.

With respect to any termination of Ms. Baier’s employment, treatment of outstanding equity awards will be as provided in the applicable award agreement governing such awards, as described below.

Any payments that are not deductible by us under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code will be cut back only to the extent that the cutback results in a betterafter-tax position for Ms. Baier.


(2)The employment agreement containsnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, and mutualnon-disparagement covenants. Thenon-competition restrictions will continue in effect during Ms. Baier’s employment and for one year following termination of employment. Thenon-solicitation restrictions will continue in effect during her employment and for two years following her termination of employment. The confidentiality and mutualnon-disparagement obligations will apply during her employment and thereafter.

Thenon-competition provisions provide that Ms. Baier shall not directly or indirectly, either as a principal, agent, employee, employer, consultant, partner, shareholder of a closely held corporation or shareholder in excess of five percent (5%) of a publicly traded corporation, corporate officer or director, or in any other individual or representative capacity, engage or otherwise participate in any manner or fashion in any business that is a Competing Business in the Area. For purposes of this provision: “Area” means a fifteen (15) mile radius of any senior living facility owned, managed or operated by us (or our successor) at the time Ms. Baier’s employment is terminated; and “Competing Business” means the business of owning, operating or managing senior living facilities having gross annualized revenues of at least $35 million or owning, operating or managing, in the aggregate, at least 1,000 units/beds provided that at least 750 units/beds owned, operated or managed by such business are located within the Area.

Severance Policy

Ms. Patchett participates in the Severance Policy as a “Designated Officer” as defined therein, and each of Messrs. Swain, White, and Kaestner participates in the Severance Policy as a “Selected Officer” as defined therein. Mr. Kaestner is party to separate letter agreements with us dated effective as of August 6, 2010 and September 25, 2019, which provide for certain modifications of the Severance Policy as it applies to Mr. Kaestner, described further below.

38        


The table below sets forth the severance pay and benefits available under the Severance Policy for the participating named executive officers assuming a “separation from service” (as defined in the Severance Policy) without cause or without cause or for good reason within 18 months following a change in control.

Separation without Cause Not
within 18 Months Following
Change in Control
Separation without Cause or for
Good Reason within 18 Months
Following Change in  Control
Other Severance Pay and
Benefits for Both
Circumstances

Ms. Patchett

•  150% of base salary and target annual bonus payable over 18 months

•  200% of base salary payable over 18 months

•  200% of target annual bonus payable 60 days after termination

•  Pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination to the extent earned, payable when such bonus would otherwise be due

Messrs. Swain, White, and Kaestner

•  100% of base salary and target annual bonus payable over 12 months

•  150% of base salary and target annual bonus payable over 18 months

•  COBRA Benefits for length of severance payment period

In addition to the foregoing, pursuant to Mr. Kaestner’s 2010 letter agreement, if Mr. Kaestner separates from service for good reason otherwise than within 18 months following a change in control, he will be eligible to receive 100% of his annual salary and 75% of his target annual bonus payable over 12 months. Further, pursuant to Mr. Kaestner’s 2019 letter agreement, if we complete the dispositions of our interests in our 16 entry fee CCRCs before January 1, 2021, such completion will be deemed to be a change in control under the Severance Policy if Mr. Kaestner is not offered continued acceptable employment with us or the acquiror of at least a majority of the entry fee CCRCs. An offer of continued acceptable employment means any offer of employment by us or the acquiror accepted by Mr. Kaestner, employment with us with compensation that is not materially and significantly reduced, or employment with the acquiror with responsibilities, duties, and compensation that are not materially and significantly reduced. In addition, pursuant to such letter, we agreed to request that the Committee approve the acceleration and vesting of any of Mr. Kaestner’s outstanding equity awards upon consummation of such transactions. If our sale of our interests in all 16 entry fee CCRCs does not occur before January 1, 2021, the Severance Policy will continue to apply to Mr. Kaestner without modification by such letter.

Payments of the foregoing severance pay and benefits under the Severance Policy are conditioned upon the executive having signed and returned an effective waiver and release of claims in a form satisfactory to us and continuing to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants. In 2020, the Committee amended the Severance Policy to further condition payments of such severance pay and benefits upon the executive having executed and delivered an enforceablenon-competition covenant acceptable to the Company with a duration of 12 months following termination of employment. The executive must acknowledge in the waiver and release that all restrictive covenants, including the foregoingnon-competition covenant and covenants contained in equity award agreements to which he or she is a party will remain in force for the period specified in such covenants. A breach of such covenants will result in the cessation of severance pay and benefits and may result in such executive’s being required to repay certain severance pay and benefits already provided as well as certain costs and expenses. If payments pursuant to the Severance Policy are not deductible by us under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments shall be reduced (or repaid) in order to ensure our deduction of payments in connection with a change in control.

Outstanding Equity Award Agreements

Time-Based Restricted Shares Granted Prior to 2020

With respect to time-based restricted shares granted prior to 2020 that vest ratably on an annual basis: (i) if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability (or with respect to Ms. Baier’s awards granted on or after March 1, 2018 by her for good reason as defined in her employment agreement), the next tranche of unvested restricted shares will immediately vest and the remaining unvested restricted shares will

        39


immediately be forfeited; (ii) upon the occurrence of a change in control, the next tranche of unvested restricted shares will immediately vest and the remaining unvested restricted shares will remain outstanding and eligible to vest on the previously established vesting dates, subject to continued employment, and (iii) in the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in Ms. Baier’s employment agreement or the Severance Policy, as applicable) within 12 months following a change in control, all remaining unvested restricted shares will immediately vest.

With respect to time-based restricted shares awarded in January 2018 for which 75% are eligible to vest on February 27, 2021 and 25% are eligible to vest on February 27, 2022: (i) if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability, the next tranche of unvested restricted shares will immediately vest and the remaining unvested restricted shares will immediately be forfeited; provided, however, that if the termination had occurred on or prior to February 27, 2019, 25% of the unvested restricted shares would have immediately vested and the remaining unvested restricted shares would have immediately been forfeited, and if the termination had occurred after February 27, 2019 and on or before February 27, 2020, 50% of the unvested restricted shares would have immediately vested and the remaining unvested restricted shares would have immediately been forfeited; (ii) upon the occurrence of a change in control, the next tranche of unvested restricted shares will immediately vest, and the remaining unvested restricted shares will remain outstanding and will vest on the previously established vesting dates, subject to continued employment; provided, however, that if the change in control had occurred on or prior to February 27, 2019, 25% of the unvested restricted shares would have immediately vested and if the change in control had occurred after February 27, 2019 and on or before February 27, 2020, 50% of the unvested restricted shares would have immediately vested; and (iii) if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in the Severance Policy) within 12 months following a change in control, all remaining unvested restricted shares will immediately vest.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units Granted in 2020

With respect to time-based RSUs granted in 2020: (i) if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability (or with respect to Ms. Baier’s awards, by her for good reason as defined in her employment agreement), the next tranche of unvested RSUs will vest upon such termination and be settled within 30 days, and the remaining outstanding RSUs will immediately be forfeited; (ii) upon the occurrence of a change in control in which the outstanding RSUs are not assumed, continued, or substituted with an award relating to a publicly-traded security of the acquiror (or the Company) on the same terms and conditions that were applicable to the outstanding RSUs immediately prior to the change in control, such outstanding RSUs will vest and be settled upon consummation of the change in control; and (iii) in the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in Ms. Baier’s employment agreement or the Severance Policy, as applicable) within 12 months following a change in control in which such outstanding RSUs were assumed, continued, or substituted, all RSUs outstanding at the time of such termination will vest upon such termination and be settled within 30 days.

Performance-Based Restricted Shares Granted in 2016 and 2017

With respect to performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2016 and 2017, if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability, the unvested restricted shares eligible to vest on the next vesting date will remain outstanding until the next vesting date (with all other unvested restricted shares from the award immediately being forfeited) and will vest only if and to the extent that the relevant performance targets for such tranche are achieved. However, with respect to such awards, if the termination had occurred on or prior to the second anniversary or first anniversary prior to the vesting date for the first tranche of shares, the executive would have only been able to achieve vesting of up to 25% or 50%, respectively, of the unvested restricted shares based on ourone-year ortwo-year CAGR of Adjusted CFFO per share or Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow, as applicable, respectively.

Under the terms of such awards, upon the occurrence of a change in control, all of the shares will automatically convert to time-based restricted shares. In addition, upon the date of the change in control, the next tranche of these

40        


shares will immediately vest. However, if the change in control had occurred on or prior to the second anniversary or first anniversary prior to the vesting date for the first tranche of shares, only 25% or 50%, respectively, of the unvested restricted shares would have immediately vested. All other shares will remain outstanding and eligible to vest on the previously established vesting dates, subject to continued employment. In the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in the Severance Policy) within 12 months following such change in control, all remaining unvested restricted shares will immediately vest.

Performance-Based Restricted Shares Granted in 2018

With respect to the performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2018, if an executive’s employment was or is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability (or with respect to Ms. Baier’s award, by her for good reason as defined in her employment agreement): (i) on or before February 27, 2019,one-third of the shares would have remained outstanding and eligible to vest on February 27, 2019 based on, and subject to, the15-day volume weighted average price per share (“VWAP”) as of December 31, 2018 compared to a partial-period TSR target, and the remainder of such outstanding shares would have been immediately forfeited; (ii) after February 27, 2019 and on or before February 27, 2020,two-thirds of the shares would have remained outstanding and eligible to vest on February 27, 2020 based on, and subject to, the15-day VWAP as of December 31, 2019 compared to a partial-period TSR target, and the remainder of such outstanding shares would have been immediately forfeited; and (iii) after February 27, 2020, 100% of the shares will remain outstanding and eligible to vest on February 27, 2021 based on, and subject to, the15-day VWAP as of December 31, 2020 compared to the stated TSR target.

Under the terms of such outstanding restricted shares, upon the occurrence of a change in control occurring (i) on or before February 27, 2019,one-third of the shares would have accelerated and vested and the remainder would have converted to time-based restricted shares eligible to vest in two equal annual installments beginning on February 27, 2020, subject to continued employment; (ii) after February 27, 2019 and on or before February 27, 2020,two-thirds of the shares would have accelerated and vested and the remainder would have converted to time-based restricted shares eligible to vest on February 27, 2021, subject to continued employment; and (iii) after February 27, 2020 and on or before February 27, 2021, all of the shares will accelerate and vest. In the event that the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in Ms. Baier’s employment agreement or the Severance Policy, as applicable) within 12 months following such change in control, all remaining unvested shares will immediately vest.

Performance-Based Restricted Shares Granted in 2019

With respect to the performance-based restricted shares awarded in 2019, if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability (or with respect to Ms. Baier’s award, by her for good reason as defined in her employment agreement): (i) on or before February 27, 2020,one-third of the shares eligible to vest on February 27, 2022 based on the CAGR of Same-Community RevPAR performance goal (together with any additional shares that may be issued as a result of performance in excess of the target level, the “First Tranche Shares”) andone-fourth of the shares eligible to vest on February 27, 2023 based on the relative TSR performance goal (together with any additional shares that may be issued as a result of performance in excess of the target level, the “Second Tranche Shares”) would have remained outstanding and eligible to vest upon the Committee’s certification of our performance following December 31, 2021, and the remainder of such outstanding shares would have been immediately forfeited; (ii) after February 27, 2020 and on or before February 27, 2021,two-thirds of the First Tranche Shares andone-half of the Second Tranche Shares will remain outstanding and eligible to vest upon the Committee’s certification of our performance following December 31, 2021, and the remainder of such outstanding shares will be immediately forfeited; (iii) after February 27, 2021 and before December 31, 2021, all of the First Tranche Shares and three-fourths of the Second Tranche Shares will remain outstanding and eligible to vest upon the Committee’s certification of our performance following December 31, 2021, and the remainder of such outstanding shares will be immediately forfeited; (iv) on or after December 31, 2021 and on or before February 27, 2022, all of the then outstanding First Tranche Shares and three-fourths of the then outstanding Second Tranche Shares (in each

        41


case, such number of shares to be determined following applicationremaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans approved by security holders consists of the performance goals and targets) will vest upon the Committee’s certification of our performance and the remainder of such Second Tranche Shares will be immediately forfeited; and (v) after February 27, 2022, all of the then outstanding Second Tranche Shares will vest effective upon the date of termination.

Under the terms of such outstanding restricted7,957,894 shares upon the occurrence of a change in control, such shares will be converted into time-based restricted shares if it occurs before December 31, 2021, and such shares shall vest or remain outstanding and eligible to vest as follows: (i) if the change in control had occurred on or before February 27, 2020,one-third of the First Tranche Shares andone-fourth of the Second Tranche Shares would have accelerated and vested, and the remaining First Tranche Shares and Second Tranche Shares would have been eligible to vest on February 27, 2022 and February 27, 2023, respectively, subject to continued employment; (ii) if the change in control occurs after February 27, 2020 and on or before February 27, 2021,two-thirds of the First Tranche Shares andone-half of the Second Tranche Shares will accelerate and vest, and the remaining First Tranche Shares and Second Tranche Shares will be eligible to vest on February 27, 2022 and February 27, 2023, respectively, subject to continued employment; (iii) if the change in control occurs after February 27, 2021 and before December 31, 2021, all of the First Tranche Shares and three-fourths of the Second Tranche Shares will accelerate and vest, and the remaining Second Tranche Shares will be eligible to vest on February 27, 2023, subject to continued employment; (iv) if the change in control occurs on or after December 31, 2021 and on or before February 27, 2022, all of the then outstanding First Tranche Shares and three-fourths of the then outstanding Second Tranche Shares (in each case, such number of shares to be determined following application of the performance goals and targets) will accelerate and vest, and the remaining Second Tranche Shares will be eligible to vest on February 27, 2023, subject to continued employment; and (v) if the change in control occurs after February 27, 2022, all of the then outstanding Second Tranche Shares will accelerate and vest. In the event that the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause, or by the executiveavailable for good reason (as defined in Ms. Baier’s employment agreement or the Severance Policy, as applicable), within 12 months following such change in control, all then outstanding First Tranche Shares and Second Tranche Shares will accelerate and vest.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Granted in 2020

With respect to performance-based RSUs granted in 2020, if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or due to death or disability (or with respect to Ms. Baier’s award, by her for good reason as defined in her employment agreement), apro-rata percentage of the RSUs will remain outstanding following such termination and will be eligible to vest subject to achievement of the performance criteria as of the applicable vesting date, and the remaining outstanding RSUs will immediately be forfeited. For purposes of these awards, thepro-rata percentage means: with respect to the RSUs eligible to vest on February 27, 2023, 33 1/3%, 66 2/3%, and 100% if such termination of employment occurs on or prior to February 27, 2021, after February 27, 2021 but on or prior to February 27, 2022, and after February 27, 2022, respectively; and with respect to the RSUs eligible to vest on February 27, 2024, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% if such termination of employment occurs on or prior to February 27, 2021, after February 27, 2021 but on or prior to February 27, 2022, after February 27, 2022 but on or prior to February 27, 2023, and after February 27, 2023, respectively.

Under the terms of such outstanding RSUs, upon the occurrence of a change in control in which the outstanding RSUs are not assumed, continued, or substituted with an award relating to a publicly-traded security of the acquiror (or the Company) on the same terms and conditions that were applicable to the outstanding RSUs immediately prior to the change in control, such outstanding RSUs will vest and be settled upon consummation of the change in control. If such outstanding awards are so assumed, continued, or substituted, the outstanding RSUs will continue to vest at target level performance conditioned only upon continued employment if such change in control occurs prior to the conclusion of the performance period on December 31, 2022, and the outstanding RSUs determined after application of the performance criteria will continue to vest conditioned only upon continued employment if such change in control occurs on or after conclusion of such performance period. With respect to such assumed, continued, or substituted RSUS, in the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as defined in Ms. Baier’s employment agreement or the Severance Policy, as applicable)

42        


within 12 months following a change in control, all RSUs outstanding at the time of such termination will vest upon such termination and be settled within 30 days.

Definitions of Change in Control, Cause and Good Reason

Under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement, the Severance Policy, andfuture issuance under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a “changeexcluding those reported in control” shall be deemed to have occurred ifcolumn (a) any person becomes, and 230,580 shares remaining available for future issuance under our Associate Stock Purchase Plan.

(3)Represents shares remaining available for future issuance under our Director Stock Purchase Plan. Under the beneficial owner of securities representing fifty percent (50%) or more ofexisting compensation program for the combined voting powermembers of our outstanding securities (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from us or any of our affiliates); (b) we or any of our subsidiaries merge or consolidate with any other corporation, except when the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior to the transaction constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors, of the surviving entity (or its ultimate parent); or (c) our stockholders approve a plan of liquidation or dissolution or we complete the sale of all or substantially all of our assets (other than a sale to an entity, at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the securities of which are owned by our stockholders after the transaction in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of us prior to the transaction, or other than a sale immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior to the transaction constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors of the entity to which the assets are sold (or its ultimate parent)). In addition, for purposes of our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a “change in control” shall be deemed to have occurred if the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of directors then serving on the Board: individuals who were directors on June 5, 2014 and any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including, but not limited to, a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors on June 5, 2014 or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended. In any event, a “change of control” shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction (or series of integrated transactions) immediately following which our stockholders prior to the transaction(s) continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in any entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of the us immediately following such transaction(s).

Under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement and the Severance Policy, “cause” means (a) conviction of, guilty plea concerning or confession of any felony; (b) any act of fraud, theft or embezzlement committed by the executive in connection with our or our subsidiaries’ business; (c) any material breach of any reasonable and lawful rule or directive; (d) the gross or willful neglect of duties or gross misconduct by the executive; or (e) the habitual use of drugs or habitual, excessive use of alcohol to the extent that any of such uses in the Board’s good faith determination materially interferes with the performance of the executive’s duties. For purposes of Ms. Baier’s employment agreement, “cause” is also defined to include any material breach by Ms. Baier of the agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure. Under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, unless otherwise defined in an employment agreement applicable to the executive, “cause” means the continued failure of the executive to substantially perform his or her duties and obligations, the executive’s fraud or material dishonesty against us, or the executive’s conviction or plea of guilty or nolo contendere for the commission of a felony or a crime involving material dishonesty.

Under Ms. Baier’s employment agreement and the Severance Policy, “good reason” means the occurrence, without the executive’s written consent, of any of the following circumstances, unless such circumstances are fully corrected by us within thirty (30) days following written notice by the executive that he or she intends to terminate employment for one of the reasons set forth below: (i) the failure by us to pay to the executive any portion of his or her base salary or bonus within thirty (30) days of the date such compensation is due; (ii) the relocation of the executive’s principal office to a location outside a fifty (50) mile radius from the executive’s present principal office location; or (iii) the executive is assigned duties, compensation or responsibilities that are materially and significantly reduced with respect to the scope or nature of his or her duties, compensation and/or responsibilities. For purposes of Ms. Baier’s employment agreement, “good reason” is also defined to include any material breach by us of the agreement.

        43


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2019, Mses. Freed and Warren, Mr. Bumstead, and former director Jackie M. Clegg served on the Committee. None of these persons has at any time been an officer or employee of us or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, there are no relationships among our executive officers, members of the Committee or entities whose executives serve on the Board or the Committee that require disclosure under applicable SEC regulations.

Pay Ratio

For 2019, the ratio of the total annual compensation of Ms. Baier to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our other employees was 317:1. The median of the annual total compensation of our employees, other than Ms. Baier, was $20,057 for 2019.

We identified the median employee using our employee population of approximately 58,400 employees as of December 31, 2019, 34% of whom are part-time. In determining the median employee, we did not make any full-time equivalent adjustments to compensation of our part-time employees. Consistent with the prior year, to identify the median employee, we used amounts reported in box 5 of wage statements on FormW-2 as our consistently applied compensation measure. We then calculated the annual total compensation for the identified employee in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table (including matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan and premiums on Company-provided life and disability insurance). For the annual total compensation of Ms. Baier, we used the amount reported in the “total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

44        


Director Compensation  

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

The table below sets forth the elements of theeach non-employee director compensation program. During 2019, the Committee reviewed the program, including receiving a market compensation study from the Consultant regarding the practices of the compensation peer group approved by the Committee for 2019 annual compensation decisions. The Committee made no changes to the program at that time. Later during the year, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a change to the program such that if a director retires prior to the date of the annual grant of immediately vested stock or concludes his or her service at the expiration of his or her term of office, apro-rata cash amount will be payable to the director at the time of retirement or expiration in lieu of the annual grant of immediately vested shares, in recognition of the partial year of service. The Committee also recommended, and the Board approved, an increase to the retainer for service as chair of the Investment Committee from $10,000 to $15,000 effective October 29, 2019.

In 2020, the Committee again reviewed thenon-employee director compensation program, including receiving a market compensation study from the Consultant related to the peer group approved by the Committee for 2020 annual compensation decisions. Following such review, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the changes to the program noted below.

Cash Fees

2019Changes for 2020Description

Annual Retainer

$

  100,000

No change

Cash retainers are payable quarterly in arrears and arepro-rated for service less than the full year. Cash meeting fees are payable quarterly in arrears for attendance by the director or committee member in person or telephonically. Each director has the opportunity to elect to receive either immediately vested shares or restricted stock units in lieu of up to 50% of quarterly cash compensation, as described below.

Annual Committee Chair Retainers:

Audit

$

  20,000

No change

Compensation/NCG

$

  15,000

No change

Investment(1)

$

  15,000

No change

Meeting Attendance Fees:

Per Board Meeting

$

  3,000

Applicable only to
meetings in excess
of 6 per year

Per Committee Meeting
(Members Only)

$

  2,000

Applicable only to
meetings in
excess of 8 per
director per year

Equity Awards

Annual Grant of Immediately Vested Stock under 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan

$  100,000Increased to
$135,000
(applicable to
2021 award for
2020 service)
Typically granted in February each year for service in the prior year andpro-rated for service less than the full year. Directors may elect to receive restricted stock units (as described below) in lieu of the immediately vested shares. If a director retires prior to the annual grant date or concludes his or her service at the expiration of his or her term of

        45


      office, apro-rata cash amount will be payable to the director at the time of retirement or expiration in lieu of the annual grant of immediately vested shares, in recognition of the partial year of service.

Initial Grant of Restricted Shares under 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan

  $100,000  No change  Granted to each newnon-employee director upon joining the Board. The restricted shares awarded during 2019 are eligible to vest on the earlier to occur of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders or the first anniversary of our 2019 annual meeting, subject to the director’s continued service.

(1)

The retainer payable to the chair of the Investment Committee was increased from $10,000 to $15,000 effective October 29, 2019.

Eachnon-employee director has the opportunity to elect to receive either immediately vested shares or restricted stock units in lieu of up to 50% of the director’shis or her quarterly cash compensation. Any immediately vested shares that are elected to be received will be issued pursuant to the Director Stock Purchase Plan. Under the director compensation program, all cash amounts are payable quarterly in arrears, with payments to be made on April 1, July 1, October 1 and to electJanuary 1. Any immediately vested shares that a director elects to receive restricted stock units in lieu ofunder the annual grant of immediately vested shares. Immediately vested shares are issued under our Director Stock Purchase Plan and restricted stock unitswill be issued at the same time that cash payments are issued under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan. With respect to quarterly cash elections, themade. The number of shares or restricted stock units to be issued iswill be based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of issuance (i.e., April 1, July 1, October 1 and January 1), or if such date is not a trading date, on the previous trading day’sday's closing price. Each restricted stock unitFractional amounts will be payablepaid in the form of one share of our common stock following the director’s termination of service as a member of the Board.

46        


Compensation ofNon-Executive Chairman of the Board

Mr. Wielansky served as ourNon-Executive Chairman of the Board through December 31, 2019. His compensation arrangements for service asNon-Executive Chairman remained unchanged from 2018 when he was appointed to serve in the role. Under such arrangements Mr. Wielansky received compensation applicable generally tonon-employee directors described above and received an additional annual cash retainer of $250,000 for his service asNon-Executive Chairman through 2019. All cash amounts were payable as noted in the table above.

cash. The Board appointed Mr. Sansone asNon-Executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2020. In connection with his appointment, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a reduction to the retainer for service asNon-Executive Chairman. Such reduction reflected the Committee’s view that the time commitment of theNon-Executive Chair role had reduced since we initiated a turnaround strategy under new leadership in 2018. As a result, Mr. Sansone receives compensation applicable generally tonon-employee directors described above and receives an additional annual cash retainer of $100,000 for his service asNon-Executive Chairman. All cash amounts are payable as noted in the table above.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines that require each of ournon-employee directors to maintain ownership of a multiple of thenon-employee director’s annual cash retainer for service on the Board, exclusive of any retainers for service as chairman of the Board or any of its committees and any cash meeting fees. In 2020, the Board amended the guidelines to increase the multiple from 3.0x to 5.0x of the annual cash retainer after reviewing the practices of the compensation peer group approved by the Committee for 2020.

Unvested equity awards do not generally count toward satisfaction of the guidelines. Stock ownership levels are required to be achieved by the fifth anniversary of the director’s initial appointment or election to the Board (or, if later, the fifth anniversary of adoption of the guidelines). Until the expected ownership level is achieved, each director is expected to retain at least 50% of any shares obtained through our stock incentive plans.

As of April 24, 2020, each of ournon-employee directors is in compliance with the guidelines, but each other than Mr. Bumstead holds fewer shares than required by the increased 5.0x guideline. Therefore, each of thenon-employee directors other than Mr. Bumstead will be expected to retain at least 50% of any shares obtained through our stock incentive plans until the required holding level is met.

        47


Director Compensation for 2019

The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our directors for the year ended December 31, 2019, other than Ms. Baier whose compensation information is set forth under “Executive Compensation”. Each of the directors included in the table served for the full-year 2019, except that Ms. Freed and Mr. Sansone joined the Board at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders held on October 29, 2019 as successors to former directors Jackie M. Clegg and James R. Seward, whose terms expired at the annual meeting.

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
  

Stock       

Awards (1)(2)

   All Other
Compensation
   Total   

Marcus E. Bromley

  

$

  157,000

 

 $  99,995 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  256,995  

 

Frank M. Bumstead

  $  190,000  $  99,995 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  289,995  

 

Victoria L. Freed

  

$

  24,391

 

 $  99,996 (4)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  124,387  

 

Rita Johnson-Mills

  

$

  170,609

 (5) 

 $  41,367 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  211,976  

 

Guy P. Sansone

  

$

  20,391

 

 $  99,996 (4)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  120,387  

 

Denise W. Warren

  

$

  172,500

 

 $  24,382 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  196,882  

 

Lee S. Wielansky

  

$

  406,609

 

 $  99,995 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  506,604  

 

Jackie M. Clegg

  

$

  249,052

 (6) 

 $  99,995 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  349,047  

 

James R. Seward

  

$

  227,408

 (6) 

 $  99,995 (3)      

$

  –

 

  

$

  327,403  

 

(1)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of immediately vested stock and/or restricted shares computed in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Original Filing for a summary of the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards

(2)

As of December 31, 2019, (i) none of the directors held any unvested stock awards, except that each of Ms. Freed and Mr. Sansone held 14,727 time-based restricted shares, and (ii) Ms. Johnson-Mills held 3,580 vested restricted stock units.

(3)

Represents the grant date fair value of the annual grant of unrestricted shares for the previous year served awarded on February 11, 2019, consisting of: 12,722 immediately vested shares for each of Messrs. Bromley, Bumstead, Wielansky, and Seward and Ms. Clegg; 5,263 immediately vested shares for Ms. Johnson-Mills; and 3,102 immediately vested shares for Ms. Warren.

(4)

Represents the grant date fair value of the initial grant of 14,727 time-based restricted shares awarded on December 13, 2019 to each of Ms. Freed and Mr. Sansone in connection with their joining the Board on October 29, 2019.

(5)

Ms. Johnson-Mills elected to receive vested restricted stock units in lieu of a portion of her cash compensation for service during 2019. The reported amount includes: 1,060 vested restricted stock units issued on April 1, 2020 for service during the first quarter of 2019 with a grant date fair value of $6,996; 1,338 vested restricted stock units issued on July 1, 2019 for service during the second quarter of 2019 with a grant date fair value of $9,995; 1,182 vested restricted stock units issued on October 1, 2019 for service during the third quarter of 2019 with a grant date fair value of $9,196; and 1,089 vested restricted stock units issued on January 1, 2020 for service during the fourth quarter of 2019 with a grant date fair value of $7,917.

(6)

Includes $82,740 of cash paid to each of Ms. Clegg and Mr. Seward, representing the cash amount paid in lieu of thepro-rata annual grant of immediately vested stock for service through the expiration of their terms of office at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders held on October 29, 2019.

48        


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth, as of April 24, 2020, the total number ofDirectors initially reserved 100,000 shares of our common stock beneficially owned, andfor issuance under the percent so owned, by (1) each person known by us to own more than 5% of our common stock, (2) each of our directors and named executive officers and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group, based on 183,164,490 shares of our common stock outstanding as of that date (excluding restricted shares and restricted stock units). Unless otherwise indicated, each of the beneficial owners listed has, to the Company’s knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated shares of common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in the table is c/o Brookdale Senior Living Inc., 111 Westwood Place, Suite 400, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  

Number of Shares

   

Percentage

 

Executive Officers and Directors(1)

          

Lucinda M. Baier

  

 

252,154    

 

  

 

*

 

Steven E. Swain

  

 

22,659    

 

  

 

*

 

Mary Sue Patchett

  

 

101,238    

 

  

 

*

 

Chad C. White

  

 

50,928    

 

  

 

*

 

H. Todd Kaestner

  

 

98,868    

 

  

 

*

 

Jordan R. Asher

  

 

–    

 

  

 

*

 

Marcus E. Bromley

  

 

75,171    

 

  

 

*

 

Frank M. Bumstead

  

 

300,224    

 

  

 

*

 

Victoria L. Freed

  

 

2,491    

 

  

 

*

 

Rita Johnson-Mills

  

 

41,907    

 

  

 

*

 

Guy P. Sansone

  

 

2,491    

 

  

 

*

 

Denise W. Warren

  

 

48,606    

 

  

 

*

 

Lee S. Wielansky

  

 

101,338    

 

  

 

*

 

All executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons)

  

 

1,252,845    

 

  

 

*

 

5% Stockholders

  

 

    

 

     

Glenview Capital Management, LLC(2)

  

 

17,633,572    

 

  

 

9.6%

 

Deerfield Partners, L.P.(3)

  

 

17,291,933    

 

  

 

9.4%

 

The Vanguard Group(4)

  

 

17,228,568    

 

  

 

9.4%

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(5)

  

 

14,895,528    

 

  

 

8.1%

 

Renaissance Technologies LLC(6)

  

 

14,372,920    

 

  

 

7.8%

 

BlackRock, Inc.(7)

  

 

14,292,257    

 

  

 

7.8%

 

Camber Capital Management(8)

  

 

12,500,000    

 

  

 

6.8%

 

Macquarie Group Limited(9)

  

 

10,016,040    

 

  

 

5.5%

 

        49
Director Stock Purchase Plan.


*

Less than 1%

(1)

Consists of shares of common stock held as of April 24, 2020, shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on or before June 23, 2020, and for Mr. Bromley and Ms. Johnson-Mills 14,205 and 6,679 vested restricted stock units, respectively, held by the director, which were issued at the director’s election in lieu of a portion of quarterly cash compensation for service as a director. The reported amounts exclude the following number of restricted shares and RSUs outstanding as of April 24, 2020 (assuming target performance for performance-based restricted shares and RSUs): Ms. Baier–1,677,502; Mr. Swain–479,384; Ms. Patchett–301,894; Mr. White–158,220; Mr. Kaestner–121,696; Ms. Freed–14,727; Mr. Sansone–14,727; and all executive officers and directors as a group–1,252,845.

(2)

Information regarding Glenview Capital Management, LLC (“Glenview”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020 by Glenview and Larry Robbins. Glenview reported that it has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to the shares reported in the table. The address of the principal business office of Glenview is 767 Fifth Avenue, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10153.

(3)

Information regarding Deerfield Partners, L.P. (“Deerfield”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 9, 2020 by Deerfield, its general partner Deerfield Mgmt, L.P., its investment advisor Deerfield Management Company, L.P., and James Flynn. Deerfield reported that it has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to the shares reported in the table. The address of the principal business office of Deerfield is 780 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

(4)

Information regarding The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by Vanguard. Vanguard reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 179,694 shares, shared voting power with respect to 39,627 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 17,034,589 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 193,979 shares. The address of the principal business office of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(5)

Information regarding Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional Fund”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by Dimensional Fund. Dimensional Fund reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 14,455,205 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 14,895,528 shares. The address of the principal business office of Dimensional Fund is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.

(6)

Information regarding Renaissance Technologies LLC (“Renaissance”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by Renaissance and Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation. Renaissance reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 14,161,832 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 14,306,769 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 66,151 shares. The address of the principal business office of Renaissance is 800 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022.

(7)

Information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock. BlackRock reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 13,805,139 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 14,292,257 shares. The address of the principal business office of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(8)

Information regarding Camber Capital Management LP (“Camber”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020 by Camber and Stephen DuBois. Camber reported that it has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to the shares reported in the table. The address of the principal business office of Camber is 101 Huntington Avenue, Suite 2101, Boston, MA 02199.

(9)

Information regarding Macquarie Group Limited (“Macquarie”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020 by Macquarie, Macquarie Bank Limited, Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG, Macquarie Investment Management Holdings Inc. and Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust. Macquarie reported that Macquarie Investment Management Holdings Inc. and Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 9,821,171 shares and Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 194,869 shares. The address of the principal business office of Macquarie is 2005 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2019 with respect to our equity compensation plans (after giving effect to shares issued and/or vesting on such date):

Plan category

 Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)(1)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)) (c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2)

 

 

 

 

11,497,326

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(3)

 

 

 

 

35,936

Total

 

 

 

 

11,533,262

50        



(1)

As of December 31, 2019, an aggregate of 7,252,459 shares of unvested restricted stock and an aggregate of 3,580 vested restricted stock units were outstanding under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Pursuant to SEC guidance, such shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units are not reflected in the table above. Our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan allows awards to be made in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, unrestricted shares, performance awards, and other stock-based awards.

(2)

The number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans approved by security holders consists of 11,042,465 shares remaining available for future issuance under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 454,861 shares remaining available for future issuance under our Associate Stock Purchase Plan.

(3)

Represents shares remaining available for future issuance under our Director Stock Purchase Plan. Under the existing compensation program for the members of our Board of Directors, eachnon-employee director has the opportunity to elect to receive either immediately vested shares or restricted stock units in lieu of up to 50% of his or her quarterly cash compensation. Any immediately vested shares that are elected to be received will be issued pursuant to the Director Stock Purchase Plan. Under the director compensation program, all cash amounts are payable quarterly in arrears, with payments to be made on April 1, July 1, October 1 and January 1. Any immediately vested shares that a director elects to receive under the Director Stock Purchase Plan will be issued at the same time that cash payments are made. The number of shares to be issued will be based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of issuance (i.e., April 1, July 1, October 1 and January 1), or if such date is not a trading date, on the previous trading day’s closing price. Fractional amounts will be paid in cash. The Board of Directors initially reserved 100,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the Director Stock Purchase Plan.

        51


Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Independence


The Board has adopted a written Policyinformation required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussions under the headings "Certain Relationships and Procedures with RespectRelated Transactions" and "Director Independence" in our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or in an amendment to Related Person Transactions, which we referthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, to as our Related Person Policy. Pursuant to the terms of the Related Person Policy, we will enter into or ratify related person transactions only when the Audit Committee determines that the transaction in question is in, or is not inconsistentbe filed with the best interestsSEC within 120 days of the Company and our stockholders.

Related person transactions that are identified as such prior to the consummation thereof or amendment thereto may be consummated or amended only if the transaction has been reviewed and approved in advance by the Audit Committee (or in those instances where the General Counsel determines that it is not practicable or desirable for the Company to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, by the chair of the Audit Committee). All Related Persons (defined below) and all business unit leaders responsible for a proposed transaction are required to report to our legal department any potential related person transaction prior to entering into the transaction. The legal department will determine whether the transaction is a related person transaction and, therefore, should be submitted to the Audit Committee for consideration. In the event our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel becomes aware of a pending or ongoing related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, the transaction will promptly be submitted to the Audit Committee or its chair, which will evaluate all available options, including ratification, amendment or termination of the transaction. In the event any of such persons become aware of a completed related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, the Audit Committee or its chair shall evaluate the transaction to determine if rescission of the transaction and/or any disciplinary action is appropriate.

At the Audit Committee’s first meeting of each fiscal year, the committee will review any previously approved or ratified related person transactions that remain ongoing and have a remaining term of more than six months or remaining amounts payable to or receivable from the Company of more than $120,000 and, taking into consideration the Company’s contractual obligations, will determine whether to continue, modify or terminate each such transaction.

Our Related Person Policy covers all transactions, arrangements or relationships (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

A “Related Person”, as defined in our Related Person Policy, means any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year was, a director or executive officer of the Company or a nominee to become a director of the Company; any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities; any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, orsister-in-law of the director, executive officer, nominee or more than 5% beneficial owner, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director, executive officer, nominee or more than 5% beneficial owner; and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Our Related Person Policy also requires Audit Committeepre-approval of proposed charitable contributions, or pledges of charitable contributions, by the Company to a charitable ornon-profit organization for which a Related Person is actively involved in fundraising or otherwise serves as a director, trustee or in a similar capacity.

52        


Since December 31, 2018, there have not been any related person transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K.

Director Independence

The Board has affirmatively determined that eight of our nine directors, Mses. Freed, Johnson-Mills, and Warren, Dr. Asher, and Messrs. Sansone, Bromley, Bumstead, and Wielansky are “independent” under Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the NYSE, and that Ms. Clegg and Mr. Seward were independent prior to the expiration of their terms as a director at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. In each case, the Board affirmatively determined that none of such individuals had a material relationship with the Company. In making these determinations, the Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances, as required by applicable NYSE listing standards.

There were no transactions, relationships or arrangements not disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K that were considered by the Board in making the required independence determinations. None of the directors that were deemed independent had any relationship with us (other than as a director or stockholder).

2020.


Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees

Services


The Company engaged Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”)information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading "Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for audit services2021" in 2019, includingour Definitive Proxy Statement for the audit2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to be filed with the Company’s annual financial statements. The following table shows information about the respective fees billed by E&Y during or related to the fiscal years endedSEC within 120 days of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

   2019   2018 

Audit Fees

  

$

  2,162,000

 

  

$

  2,189,000

Audit-Related Fees

  

$

  –

 

  

$

  5,000

Tax Fees

  

$

  1,500

 

  

$

  35,680

All Other Fees

  

$

  –

 

  

$

  –

 

Total

  

$

  2,163,500

 

  

$

  2,229,680

“Audit Fees” include fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports (Forms10-Q) and fees for the audit of internal control over financial reporting.

“Audit-Related Fees” include fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. These fees include our purchase of subscriptions to E&Y research services.

“Tax Fees” include fees for professional services rendered by E&Y for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These corporate tax services include technical tax advice on tax matters, assistance with preparing tax returns, value added tax, government sales tax and equivalent tax matters in local jurisdictions, assistance with local tax authority documentation and reporting requirements for tax compliance purposes, assistance with tax audit defense matters, and tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions.

        53
2020.


135

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has policies and procedures that require thepre-approval by the Audit Committee or one of its members of all fees paid to, and all services performed by, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In the early part of each year, the Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of services contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by any such firm during the year. In addition,pre-approval by the Audit Committee or one of its members is also required for those engagements that may arise during the course of the year that are outside the scope of the initial services and feespre-approved by the Audit Committee. Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the fees and services provided as noted in the table above were authorized and approved in compliance with the Audit Committeepre-approval policies and procedures described herein.

54        



PART IV


Item 15.        Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

1.)    Schedules


The following documents required under this item wereare filed as part of the Original Filing:

this report:


1)Our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements


Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018

2019


Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182020, 2019, and 2017

2018


Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182020, 2019, and 2017

2018


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182020, 2019, and 2017

2018


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Schedule II—II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


2)    Exhibits:
2.)    Exhibits:

Exhibit No.Description

2.1

Description

001-32641)).

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

10.1.1

10.1.2

 10.1.3

Amendment No.  1 to Equity Interest Purchase Agreement dated as of October 29, 2019 by and among certain subsidiaries of the Company and certain subsidiaries of Healthpeak.#

 10.1.4

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Transactions and Cooperation Agreement dated as of January 31, 2020, by and among the Company and Healthpeak.#

 10.1.5

Amendment No.  2 to the Equity Interest Purchase Agreement dated as of January 31, 2020, by and among certain subsidiaries of the Company and certain subsidiaries of Healthpeak.#

 10.2.1

Master Lease and Security Agreement dated as of AprilJuly 26, 20182020 by and betweenan among certain subsidiaries of the Company’s affiliates named therein as lessees and certain of the affiliates of Ventas, Inc. named therein as lessors (the “Master Lease”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 7, 2018 (FileNo. 001-32641)).

        55


 Exhibit No.

Description

 10.2.2

Amendment No. 1 effective September  1, 2018 to Master Lease by and between certain of the Company’s affiliates named therein as lessees and certain of the affiliates of Ventas, Inc. named therein as lessors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on November 6, 2018 (FileNo. 001-32641)).

 10.2.3

Amendment No. 2 effective as of April  22, 2019 to Master Lease by and between certain affiliates of the Company named therein as Tenant and certain affiliatessubsidiaries of Ventas Inc. named therein as landlord (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 6, 2019 (FileNo. 001-32641)).

 10.2.4

Amendment No. 3 effective as of May  1, 2019 to Master Lease by and between certain affiliates of the Company named therein as Tenant and certain affiliates of Ventas, Inc. named therein as landlordLandlord (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on November 5, 2019August 10, 2020 (FileNo. 001-32641)).



  10.2.5

10.1.3

 10.2.6

Amendment No. 5 effective as of December  9, 2019 to Master Lease by and between certain affiliates of the Company named therein as Tenant and certain affiliates of Ventas, Inc. named therein as landlord.#

 10.2.7

Restated Guaranty of Master Lease dated as of AprilJuly 26, 2018 by and between the Company and certain of its affiliates named therein and Ventas, Inc. and certain of its affiliates named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 7, 2018 (FileNo. 001-32641)).

 10.3.1

Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 5, 2018, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent, lender and swingline lender, and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on December 11, 2018 (FileNo. 001-32641)).

 10.3.2

First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Other Credit Documents dated August 16, 20192020 by and among the Company as Guarantor, certain subsidiaries of the Company as Borrowers, Capital One, National Association, as Administrative Agent, LenderTenant, and Swingline Lender,Ventas and the other Lenders party theretocertain of its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.3 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on November 5, 2019August 10, 2020 (FileNo. 001-32641)).



10.1.4

10.1.5

136


10.2

 10.5

10.3

 10.6.1

10.4.1

10.4.2
56        


 Exhibit No.

Description

 10.6.2

Amendment No. 1 to Omnibus Incentive Plan effective February 12, 2020.#*

 10.7

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (Time-Vesting Form for Executive Committee Members)2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.6.2 to the Company’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form10-Q 10-K filed on May 10, 2016February 19, 2020 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.8

10.5

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (Time-Vesting Form for Executive Vice Presidents) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on May 10, 2016 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.9

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (Performance-Vesting Form for Executive Committee Members) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on May 10, 2016 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.10

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (Performance-Vesting Form for Executive Vice Presidents) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on May 10, 2016 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.11

 10.12

10.6

 10.13

10.7

 10.14

10.8

 10.15

10.9

 10.16

10.10

 10.17

10.11

 10.18

10.12

 10.19

10.13

10.14

        57


 Exhibit No.

Description

 10.20

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (2019 Time-Based Vesting Form for Executive Officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’sCompany's Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form10-K/A on April 29, 2019 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.21

10.15

10.16

 10.22

10.17

137


10.18

 10.23

10.19

 10.24.1

10.20.1

  10.24.2

10.20.2

 10.24.3

10.20.3

 10.25.1

10.21.1

 10.25.2

10.21.2

 10.25.3

Form of Severance Letter Under the Amended and Restated Tier I Severance Pay Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210.25.2 to the Company’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form10-Q 10-K filed on August 6, 2010February 19, 2020 (FileNo. 001-32641)).*

 10.26

10.22

Severance Letter Agreement dated September  25, 2019 by and between the Company and Todd Kaestner.#*

 10.27

 10.28

10.23

 10.29

21

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (2020 Time-Based Form for Executive Officers).*

 10.30

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (2020 Performance-Based Form for Executive Officers).*

 21

23

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.#

 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.#

58        


 Exhibit No.

Description

 31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 31.4

31.2

32

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104

The cover page from the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, formatted in Inline XBRL (included in Exhibit 101).

#

Filed with Original Filing

*

Management Contract or Compensatory Plan

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of RegulationS-K.

††

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted by the SEC.

        59


*    Management Contract or Compensatory Plan

†    Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally a copy of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission

††    Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K.



Item 16.        Form 10-K Summary

None.

138


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
By:

/s/ Lucinda M. Baier

Name:Lucinda M. Baier
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:April 29, 2020

60        


BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.

Appendix A Reconciliations of  

Non-GAAP Financial Measures  

By:/s/ Lucinda M. Baier
Name:Lucinda M. Baier
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:February 25, 2021

Facility Operating Income

For purposes


Pursuant to the requirements of the 2019 annual incentive plan, Facility Operating Income (FOI) was defined as our 2019 consolidated resident fee revenue less facility operating expense. The tableSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below reconciles our Facility Operating Income from our net income (loss).

   Year Ended
December 31, 2019
($ in 000s)
 

Facility Operating Income

  

Net income (loss)

  $(268,492) 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   (2,269) 

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated ventures

   4,544 

Debt modification and extinguishment costs

   5,247 

Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net

   (7,245) 

Othernon-operating (income) loss

   (14,765) 

Interest expense

   248,341 

Interest income

   (9,859) 

Income (loss) from operations

   (44,498) 

Depreciation and amortization

   379,433 

Goodwill and asset impairment

   49,266 

Loss (gain) on facility lease termination and modification, net

   3,388 

Facility operating lease expense

   269,666 

General and administrative expense (includingnon-cash stock-based compensation expense)

   219,289 

Management Fees

   (57,108) 

Facility Operating Income

  $819,436 

Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow

For purposesby the following persons on behalf of the 2019 annual incentive plan, CAFCF was defined asregistrant and in the sum ofcapacities and on the Company’s consolidated Adjusted Free Cash Flow plus its proportionate share of unconsolidated ventures’ Adjusted Free Cash Flow for 2019.

Adjusted Free Cash Flow is anon-GAAP liquidity measure that we define as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities before: distributions from unconsolidated ventures from cumulative share of net earnings, changes in prepaid insurance premiums financed with notes payable, changes in operating lease liability for lease termination and modification, cash paid/received for gain/loss on facility lease termination and modification, and lessor capital expenditure reimbursements under operating leases; plus: property insurance proceeds and proceeds from refundable entrance fees, net of refunds; less:non-development capital expenditures and payment of financing lease

dates indicated.

Signature
        A-1TitleDate


obligations.Non-development capital expenditures are comprised of corporate and community-level capital expenditures, including those related to maintenance, renovations, upgrades, and other major building infrastructure projects for our communities and is presented net of lessor reimbursements.Non-development capital expenditures do not include capital expenditures for community expansions, major community redevelopment and repositioning projects, and the development of new communities.

Our proportionate share of Adjusted Free Cash Flow of unconsolidated ventures is calculated based on our equity ownership percentage and in a manner consistent with our definition of Adjusted Free Cash Flow for our consolidated entities. Our investments in our unconsolidated ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and, therefore, our proportionate share of Adjusted Free Cash Flow of unconsolidated ventures does not represent cash available to our consolidated business except to the extent it is distributed to us.

The table below reconciles our and our proportionate share of our unconsolidated ventures’ Adjusted Free Cash Flow from our and theirs, respectively, net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. Line items under unconsolidated ventures represent the aggregate amounts of such line items for all of our unconsolidated ventures.

   Year Ended
December 31,
2019
($ in 000s)
 

Consolidated Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  $216,412 

Distributions from unconsolidated ventures from cumulative share of net earnings

   (3,472) 

Changes in assets and liabilities for lessor capital expenditure reimbursements under operating leases

   (31,305) 

Non-development capital expenditures, net

   (235,797) 

Payment of financing lease obligations

   (22,242) 

Consolidated Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  $(76,404) 

Proportionate Share of Adjusted Free Cash Flow of Unconsolidated Ventures

  

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $104,646 

Non-development capital expenditures, net

   (44,145) 

Proceeds from refundable entrance fees, net of refunds

   (26,186) 

Adjusted Free Cash Flow of Unconsolidated Ventures

  $34,315 

Brookdale weighted average ownership percentage

   51.2% 

Brookdale’s proportionate share of Adjusted Free Cash Flow of Unconsolidated Ventures

   17,570 

Combined Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  $(58,834) 

/s/ Guy P. SansoneNon-Executive Chairman of the BoardFebruary 25, 2021
Guy P. Sansone
A-2        

/s/ Lucinda M. BaierPresident, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Lucinda M. Baier(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Steven E. SwainExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2021
Steven E. Swain(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Dawn L. KussowSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 25, 2021
Dawn L. Kussow(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Jordan R. AsherDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Jordan R. Asher
/s/ Marcus E. BromleyDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Marcus E. Bromley
/s/ Frank M. BumsteadDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Frank M. Bumstead
/s/ Victoria L. FreedDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Victoria L. Freed
/s/ Rita Johnson-MillsDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Rita Johnson-Mills
/s/ Denise W. WarrenDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Denise W. Warren
/s/ Lee S. WielanskyDirectorFebruary 25, 2021
Lee S. Wielansky


139