Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form

10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
10-K

(Mark One)

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019

Or

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from ________ to _______

For the Transition Period from
to

Commission File No.

001-34037

Commission Company Name: SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES INC

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

75-2379388

Delaware

87-4613576

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston,
TX

77002

Houston, TX

77002

Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713)

(713) 654-2200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading symbol

Trading
symbol

Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock, $.001 par value

None

N/A

SPN
New York Stock Exchange

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes

No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation

S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a

non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Filer

Non-accelerated filer

Non-accelerated
filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes No

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule

12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes
No
At June 30, 2019, the aggregate

There is no market value offor the registrant’s voting stock heldsecurities.

Indicate by

non-affiliates
of check mark whether the registrant was $205.4 million. At June 1, 2020 there were 15,798,919 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Superior Energy Services, Inc. (the Company, we, us or our)has filed its Annual Report on Form
 10-K
 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the Form
10-K)
with the U.S. Securitiesall documents and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 28, 2020. The Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 to the Form
 10-K
(the Form
10-K/A
or this Amendment) solely for the purpose of including the Part III information. This information was previously omitted from the original Form
10-K
in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form
10-K,
which permits the information in Part IIIreports required to be incorporated in the Form
10-K
filed by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statementSection 12, 13 or an amendment to the
Form10-K
if such statement or amendment is filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the Company’s fiscal
year-end.
The Company is filing this Form
10-K/A
to include Part III information because the Company did not file a definitive proxy statement containing such information within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form
10-K.
This Form
 10-K/A
 hereby amends and restates in their entirety Items 10 through 14 of Part III of the Form
 10-K.
The Company is also relying on the
45-day
extension provided by an order issued on March 4, 2020 by the SEC under Section 3615(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act), granting exemptions from specified provisionssubsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes No

The number of shares of the Exchange Act and certain rules thereunder, as amended by Release No.

 34-88465
issuedregistrant's Class A common stock outstanding on March 25, 2020 (as amended,1, 2023 was 19,998,695

The number of shares of the Order) to delay the filingregistrant's Class B common stock outstanding on March 1, 2023 was 152,030

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Not applicable.


Table of this Form

after April 30, 2020, which is the original filing deadline (the Original Filing Deadline) for filing the Part III information. On April 28, 2020, the Company filed the CurrentContents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

Item 1

Business

5

Item 1A

Risk Factors

10

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

22

Item 2

Properties

22

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

22

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

23

PART II

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

24

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

25

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

35

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

37

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

75

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

75

Item 9B

Other Information

76

Item 9C

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

77

Item 11

Executive Compensation

78

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

95

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

96

Item 14

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

97

PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

98

2


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form

8-K
with the SEC to indicate its intention to rely on the Order for the extension of the filing of this Form
10-K/A.
Consistent with our statements made in the Form
8-K,
the Company was unable to file this Form
10-K/A
until the date hereof because the Company’s operations have experienced disruptions due to the circumstances surrounding the
COVID-19
pandemic including, but not limited to, suggested and mandated social distancing and stay home orders. These mandates and the resulting office closures and staff reductions have severely limited access to the Company’s facilities by the Company’s financial reporting and accounting staff as well as other advisors involved in the preparation of this Form
10-K/A
and impacted the Company’s ability to fulfill required preparation and review processes and procedures with respect to this Form
10-K/A.
In light of the impact of the factors described above, the Company was unable to compile and review certain information necessary to permit the Company to timely file this
10-K/A
by the Original Filing Deadline without unreasonable effort and expense.
Pursuant to Rule
 12b-15
 under the Exchange Act, this Form
 10-K/A
 also contains new certifications by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Accordingly, Item 15(b) of Part IV is amended and restated to include the currently dated certifications as exhibits to this Form
10-K/A.
Because no financial statements have been amended by or included in this Form
 10-K/A
 and this Form
 10-K/A
 does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation
 S-K,
 paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the certifications have been omitted.
Except as expressly noted in this Form
 10-K/A,
 this Form
 10-K/A
 does not reflect events occurring after the original filing of the Form
10-K
 or modify or update in any way any of the other disclosures contained in the Form
 10-K
 including, without limitation, the financial statements. Accordingly, this Form
 10-K/A
 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form
 10-K
 and the Company’s other filings with the SEC.

Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form
10-K/A
(the “Form 10-K”) and other documents filed by us with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain, and future oral or written statements or press releases by us and our management may contain, forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks” and “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A
10-K or such other materials regarding our financial position, financial performance, liquidity, strategic alternatives, market outlook, future capital needs, capital allocation plans, business strategies and other plans and objectives of our management for future operations and activities are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by our management in light of itstheir experience and prevailing circumstances on the date such statements are made. Such forward-looking statements, and the assumptions on which they are based, are inherently speculative and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

risks and uncertainties regarding the continuing effects of residual bankruptcy proceedings on us and our various constituents; attendant risks associated with restrictions on our ability to pursue our business strategies;
the difficulty to predict our long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of our capital resources;
restrictive covenants in the Credit Facility (as defined below) could limit our growth and our ability to finance our operations, fund our capital needs, respond to changing conditions and engage in other business activities that may be in our best interests;
the conditions in the oil and gas industry;
U.S. and global market and economic conditions, including impacts relating to inflation and supply chain disruptions;
the effects of public health threats, pandemics and epidemics, like the recent
 COVID-19
 pandemic, and the adverse impact thereof on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, including, but not limited to, our growth, operating costs, supply chain, labor availability, logistical capabilities, customer demand and industry demand generally, margins, utilization, cash position, taxes, the price of our securities, theand our ability to access capital markets;
the ability of the members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC+”) to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls;
our outstanding debt obligations and the potential effect of limiting our ability to fund future growth;
necessary capital financing may not be available at economic rates or at all;
volatility of our common stock;
operating hazards, including the significant possibility of accidents resulting in personal injury or death, or property damage for which we may have limited or no insurance coverage or indemnification rights;
we maythe possibility of not bebeing fully indemnified against losses incurred due to catastrophic events;
claims, litigation or other proceedings that require cash payments or could impair financial condition;
credit risk associated with our customer base;
the effect of regulatory programs and environmental matters on our operations or prospects;
the impact that unfavorable or unusual weather conditions could have on our operations;
the potential inability to retain key employees and skilled workers;
political, legal, economic and other risks and uncertainties associated with our international operations;
laws, regulations or practices in foreign countriesoperations could materially restrict our operations or expose us to additional risks;
potential changes in tax laws, adverse positions taken by tax authorities or tax audits impacting our operating results;
changes in competitive and technological factors affecting our operations;
risks associated with the uncertainty of macroeconomic and business conditions worldwide;
risks to our operations from potential cyber-attacks;
potential impacts of cyber-attacks on our operations;
counterparty risks associated with reliance on key suppliers;
challenges with estimating our potential liabilities related to our oil and natural gas property; and
risks associated with potential changes of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) security and bonding requirements for offshore platforms.platforms;
the likelihood that the interests of our significant stockholders may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders;
the risks associated with owning our Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), for which there is no public market; and
the likelihood that our stockholders agreement may prevent certain transactions that could otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders.

These risks and other uncertainties related to our business are described in detail below in Part I, Item 1A of thethis Form

10-K.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Investors are cautioned that many of the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are likely to change after such statements are made, including for example the market prices of oil and gas and regulations affecting oil and gas operations, which we cannot control or anticipate. Further, we may make changes to our business strategies and plans (including our capital spending and capital allocation plans) at any time and without notice, based on any changes in the

3


Table of Contents

above-listed factors, our assumptions or otherwise, any of which could or will affect our results.


Table of Contents
For all these reasons, actual events and results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or implied by us in our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of our forward-looking statements for any reason, notwithstanding any changes in our assumptions, changes in our business plans, our actual experience, or other changes. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.

4


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Superior Energy Services is a global oilfield products and services company with a portfolio of premier rental and well servicing brands providing customers with robust inventory, expedient delivery, engineered solutions and expert consultative service — all aligned with enterprise-wide Shared Core Values for safe, sustainable operations, corporate citizenship and a commitment to free cash flow generation and value creation.

From drilling equipment rentals to oilfield services, our portfolio of global companies provides highly specialized solutions for maintaining safety, efficiency, profitability, and ESG compliance.

Products and Services

Combining financial discipline with corporate services expertise, Superior maintains a strategy focused on businesses critical to our customers' success. We support our portfolio of brands with the necessary resources and leadership so they can add value to our customers’ operations with an emphasis on quality, safety, and sustainability.

Rentals

Our rentals services brands offer value-added products and services to meet a wide range of project needs. With a long history of delivering maximum value, these brands help customers and vendor partners achieve safety, efficiency and sustainability goals. Our rental segment operates with low labor intensity and a substantial catalog of product offerings.

The products and service offerings of Rentals are;

Engineering and design services;
Rental of premium downhole tubulars, drill pipe and handling accessories;
manufacturing and rental of bottom hole assembly accessories;
rentals of offshore accommodation units.

Well Services

Our Well Services brands provide specialized solutions for drilling, production, completion and decommissioning. They have a proven track record of meeting operators’ expectations and delivering the products and expertise success demands. Among our customers and vendor partners, these brands have a history of strong, collaborative relationships.

The products and service offerings of Well Services are

Risk management, well control and training solutions;
Hydraulic workover and snubbing services;
Engineering and manufacturing of premium completion tools;
Cementing, wireline, and coil tubing services with operations in Latin America and Kuwait.

Emergence from Voluntary Reorganization under Chapter 11

On December 7, 2020, certain of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Affiliate Debtors”) filed petitions for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and, in connection therewith, filed the proposed Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Plan”). On February 2, 2021 (the “Emergence Date”), the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan were satisfied and we emerged from Chapter 11.

On the Emergence Date, we qualified for and adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No. 852 – Reorganizations, which specifies the accounting and financial reporting requirements for entities reorganizing through Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The application of fresh start accounting resulted in a new basis of accounting and we became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the implementation of the Plan and the application of fresh start accounting, our historical financial statements on or before the Emergence Date are not a reliable indicator of our results of operations for any period after our adoption of fresh start accounting.

5


Table of Contents

As used herein, “Superior,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to (i) prior to the Emergence Date, SESI Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Superior Energy Services, Inc.) (“Predecessor”) and its subsidiaries and (ii) after the Emergence Date, Superior Energy Services, Inc. (formerly known as Superior Newco, Inc.) and its subsidiaries (“Successor”). Additionally, the use the following terms refer to our operations:

"Predecessor Period"

January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021

"Successor Period"

February 3, 2021 through December 31, 2021

Customers

Our customers are major and independent oil and gas companies that are active in the geographic areas in which we operate. There were no customers that exceeded 10% of our total revenues in 2022, 2021 or 2020. A reduction in sales to any of our existing large customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Competition

We provide products and services worldwide in highly competitive markets, with competitors comprised of both small or regionally focused companies in our Rentals segment, and large or international companies in our Well services segment. Our revenues and earnings can be affected by several factors, including but not limited to changes in competition, fluctuations in drilling and completion activity, perceptions of future prices of oil and gas, government regulation, disruptions caused by factors such as weather, pandemics, and geopolitics, and general economic conditions. We believe that the principal competitive factors are price, performance, product and service quality, safety, response time and breadth of products and services.

Potential Liabilities and Insurance

Our operations involve a high degree of operational risk and expose us to significant liabilities. An accident involving our services or equipment, or the failure of a product sold by us, could result in personal injury, loss of life, and damage to property, equipment or the environment. Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence, such as fire, explosion, well blowout or vessel loss, may result in substantial claims for damages.

As is customary in our industry, our contracts generally provide that we will indemnify and hold harmless our customers from any claims arising from personal injury or death of our employees, damage to or loss of our equipment, and pollution emanating from our equipment and services. Similarly, our customers generally agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any claims arising from personal injury or death of their employees, damage to or loss of their equipment or property, and pollution caused from their equipment or the well reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir). Nonetheless, our indemnification arrangements may not protect us in every case.

We maintain a liability insurance program that covers against certain operating hazards, including product liability, property damage and personal injury claims, as well as certain limited environmental pollution claims for damage to a third party or its property arising out of contact with pollution for which we are liable, but well control costs are not covered by this program. These policies include primary and excess umbrella liability policies with limits of $200 million per occurrence, including sudden and accidental pollution incidents. All of the insurance policies we purchase contain specific terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions and are subject to either deductibles or self-insured retention amounts for which we are responsible. There can be no assurance that the nature and amount of insurance we maintain will be sufficient to fully protect us against all liabilities related to our business.

Government Regulation

Our business is significantly affected by federal, state and local laws and other regulations. These laws and regulations relate to, among other things:

worker safety standards;
the protection of the environment;
the handling and transportation of hazardous materials; and
the mobilization of our equipment to, and operations conducted at, our work sites.

Numerous permits are required for the conduct of our business and operation of our various facilities and equipment, including our underground injection wells, trucks and other heavy equipment. These permits can be revoked, modified or renewed by issuing authorities based on factors both within and outside our control.

6


Table of Contents

We cannot predict the level of enforcement of existing laws and regulations or how such laws and regulations may be interpreted by enforcement agencies or court rulings in the future. We also cannot predict whether additional laws and regulations will be adopted, including changes in regulatory oversight, increase of federal, state or local taxes, increase of inspection costs, or the effect such changes may have on us, our businesses or our financial condition.

Environmental Matters

Our operations, and those of our customers, are subject to extensive laws, regulations and treaties relating to air and water quality, generation, storage and handling of hazardous materials, and emission and discharge of materials into the environment. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all regulations affecting our business. Historically, our expenditures in furtherance of our compliance with these laws, regulations and treaties have not been material, and we do not expect the cost of compliance to be material in the future.

Numerous federal, state and local governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), issue laws and regulations that often require difficult and costly compliance measures that carry substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties and may result in injunctive obligations for non-compliance. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit before commencing operations, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with our operations, limit or prohibit construction or drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, ecologically or seismically sensitive areas and other protected areas, require action to prevent or remediate pollution from current or former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells or closing pits, result in the suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and authorizations, require that additional pollution controls be installed and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations or related to our owned or operated facilities. Liability under such laws and regulations is often strict (i.e., no showing of “fault” is required) and can be joint and several. Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances, hydrocarbons or other waste products into the environment. Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that result in more stringent and costly pollution control or waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements could materially adversely affect our operations and financial position, as well as the oil and natural gas industry and infrastructure industry in general. We have not experienced any material adverse effect from compliance with these environmental requirements. This trend, however, may not continue in the future.

Climate Change

In recent years, federal, state and local governments have taken steps to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases, collectively referred to as greenhouse gasses (“GHGs”). For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) includes billions of dollars in incentives for the development of renewable energy, clean hydrogen, clean fuels, electric vehicles, investments in advanced biofuels and supporting infrastructure and carbon capture and sequestration. These incentives could accelerate the transition of the economy away from the use of fossil fuels towards lower- or zero-carbon emissions alternatives, which could decrease demand for oil and gas and consequently adversely affect the business of our customers thereby reducing demand for our services. In addition, the IRA imposes the first ever federal fee on the emission of GHGs through a methane emissions charge. Specifically, the IRA amends the Clean Air Act to impose a fee on the emission of methane that exceeds an applicable waste emissions threshold from sources required to report their GHG emissions to the EPA, including sources in the offshore and onshore petroleum and natural gas production and gathering and boosting source categories. The methane emissions charge would start in calendar year 2024 at $900 per ton of methane, increase to $1,200 in 2025 and be set at $1,500 for 2026 and each year after. Calculation of the fee is based on certain thresholds established in the IRA.

The EPA has also finalized a series of GHG monitoring, reporting and emissions control rules for the oil and natural gas industry, and almost half of the states have already taken measures to reduce emissions of GHGs primarily through the development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap-and-trade programs. Also, states have imposed increasingly stringent requirements related to the venting or flaring of gas during oil and gas operations. While we are subject to certain federal GHG monitoring and reporting requirements, our operations currently are not adversely impacted by existing federal, state and local climate change initiatives.

At the international level, in December 2015, the United States participated in the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France. The resulting Paris Agreement calls for the parties to undertake “ambitious efforts” to limit the average global temperature, and to conserve and enhance sinks and reservoirs of GHGs. The Agreement went into effect on November 4, 2016. The Paris Agreement establishes a framework for the parties to cooperate and report actions to reduce GHG emissions. Although the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020, President Biden issued an executive order on January 20, 2021 to rejoin the Paris Agreement, which went into effect on February 19, 2021. On April 21, 2021, the United States announced that it was setting an economy-wide target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels in 2030. In November 2021, in connection with the 26th Conference of the Parties in Glasgow, Scotland, the United

7


Table of Contents

States and other world leaders made further commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emission, including reducing global methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030. Furthermore, many state and local leaders have stated their intent to intensify efforts to support the international commitments.

Restrictions on emissions of methane or carbon dioxide that may be imposed could adversely affect the oil and natural gas industry by reducing demand for hydrocarbons and by making it more expensive to develop and produce hydrocarbons, either of which could have a material adverse effect on future demand for our services. At this time, it is not possible to accurately estimate how potential future laws or regulations addressing GHG emissions would impact our business.

In addition, there have also been efforts in recent years to influence the investment community, including investment advisors and certain sovereign wealth, pension and endowment funds promoting divestment of fossil fuel equities and pressuring lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Such environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting climate change and reducing air pollution could interfere with our business activities, operations and ability to access capital. Furthermore, claims have been made against certain energy companies alleging that GHG emissions from oil and natural gas operations constitute a public nuisance under federal and/or state common law. As a result, private individuals or public entities may seek to enforce environmental laws and regulations against certain energy companies and could allege personal injury, property damages or other liabilities. While our business is not a party to any such litigation, we could be named in actions making similar allegations. An unfavorable ruling in any such case could significantly impact our operations and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

Moreover, climate change may cause more extreme weather conditions such as more intense hurricanes, thunderstorms, tornadoes and snow or ice storms, as well as rising sea levels and increased volatility in seasonal temperatures. Extreme weather conditions can interfere with our productivity and increase our costs and damage resulting from extreme weather may not be fully insured. However, at this time, we are unable to determine the extent to which climate change may lead to increased storm or weather hazards affecting our operations.

Raw Materials

We purchase various raw materials and component parts in connection with delivering our products and services. These materials are generally, but not always, available from multiple sources and may be subject to price volatility. While we generally do not experience significant long-term shortages of these materials, we have from time to time experienced temporary shortages of particular raw materials. We are always seeking ways to ensure the availability of resources, as well as manage costs of raw materials.

Seasonality

Seasonal weather and severe weather conditions can temporarily impair our operations and reduce demand for our products and services. Examples of seasonal events that negatively affect our operations include high seas associated with cold fronts during the winter months and hurricanes during the summer months in the Gulf of Mexico, and severe cold during winter months in the U.S. land market area.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately 2,200 employees. Our employees in Argentina are subject to union contracts which represents approximately 22.0% of our total employee base. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees. We strive to employ a dynamic workforce to complement our core values. Our hiring policy forbids the discrimination in employment on the basis of age, culture, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, physical appearance, race or religion. We are an inclusive company with people of various backgrounds, experience, culture, styles and talents. We are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our employees, and we pride ourselves on workplace safety. We track and maintain several key safety metrics, which senior management reviews periodically and are included in the determination of their compensation and we evaluate management on their ability to provide safe working conditions on job sites and to create a safety culture.

Facilities

We own or lease a large number of facilities in the U.S. and in various other countries throughout the world. Our international operations are primarily focused in Latin America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East/North Africa regions. As of December 31, 2022, we owned 9 properties classified as held for sale.

8


Table of Contents

Other Information

We have our principal executive offices at 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. Our telephone number is (713) 654-2200. We also have a website at http://www.superiorenergy.com.

Our Shared Core Values at Work (Code of Conduct) applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. This Code of Conduct is publicly available on the Corporate Governance page in the About Us section of our website at http://www.superiorenergy.com. Any waivers granted to directors or executive officers and any material amendment to our Code of Conduct will be posted promptly on our website and/or disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K.

Copies of the annual, quarterly and current reports we file with or furnish to the SEC, and any amendments to those reports, as well as our Code of Conduct, are available on our website free of charge soon after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information posted on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Alternatively, you may access these reports at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov/.

9


Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following information should be read in conjunction with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the matters contained under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following discussion of “risk factors” identifies the most significant risks or uncertainties that could (i) materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or prospects, as well as the market value of our securities, or (ii) cause our actual results to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations. These risks are not the only risks that we face. Our business operations could also be affected by additional factors that apply to all companies operating in the U.S. and globally, as well as other risks that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. These risks include:

Risks Related to the Chapter 11 Cases

Despite having emerged from bankruptcy on February 2, 2021, we continue to be subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with residual Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

As discussed below (see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations), we emerged from bankruptcy on the Emergence Date. It is possible that having filed for bankruptcy could adversely affect our business and relationships with customers, vendors, employees, service providers and suppliers. Due to uncertainties, many risks exist, including the following:

vendors or other contract counterparties could terminate their relationship or require financial assurances or enhanced performance;
the ability to renew existing contracts and compete for new business may be adversely affected;
the ability to attract, motivate and/or retain key executives and employees may be adversely affected;
employees may be more easily attracted to other employment opportunities; and
competitors may take business away from us, and our ability to attract and retain customers may be negatively impacted.

Because of the residual risks and uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11 Cases, the ultimate impact that events that occurred during, or that may occur subsequent to, these proceedings will have on our business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be accurately predicted or quantified. While we believe the passage of time will reduce these risks, we cannot assure you that having been subject to bankruptcy protection will not adversely affect our operations going forward.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business depends on conditions in the oil and gas industry, especially oil and natural gas prices and capital expenditures by oil and gas companies.

Our business depends on the level of oil and natural gas exploration, development and production activity of, and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and gas companies worldwide. The level of exploration, development and production activity is directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas prices, which historically have been volatile and difficult to predict and are likely to continue to be volatile. Oil and natural gas prices are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, economic growth trends, market uncertainty and a variety of other factors beyond our control. Price volatility continued throughout part of 2022, primarily due to the impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the macroeconomic effects resulting from the related sanctions. In addition, oil prices are particularly sensitive to actual and perceived threats to global political stability and to changes in production from OPEC+ member states. The ongoing conflict, and the continuation of, or any increase in, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, has led and may continue to lead to an increase in the volatility of global oil and gas prices, which could have a corresponding negative impact on the capital expenditure of oil and gas companies as a result of the higher perceived risk. In addition, the imposition of comprehensive sanctions against Russia (including in relation to the Russian energy sector) as well as the announcement of prohibitions on Russian oil and gas imports by certain members of the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, and certain other countries, as of March 2022, including additional countries that may enforce prohibitions of a similar nature in the future, has led to and is expected to continue to lead to an increase in the price of global oil and gas prices. Lower oil and natural gas prices generally lead to decreased spending by our customers, while higher oil and natural gas prices generally lead to increased spending up to a point. Our customers may also consider the volatility of oil and natural gasprices and other risk factors and require higher returns for individual projects if there is higher perceived risk. Any of these factors could significantly affect the demand for oil and natural gas, which could

10


Table of Contents

affect the level of capital spending by our customers and in turn could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

The availability of quality drilling prospects, exploration success, relative production costs, expectations about future oil and natural gas demand and prices, the stage of reservoir development, the availability of financing, and political and regulatory environments are also expected to affect levels of exploration, development, and production activity, which would impact the demand for our services. Any prolonged reduction of oil and natural gas prices, as well as anticipated declines, could also result in lower levels of exploration, development, and production activity.

The demand for our services may be affected by numerous factors, including the following:

the cost of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and natural gas;
demand for energy, which is affected by worldwide economic activity, population growth and market expectations regarding future trends;
the ability of OPEC+ and other key oil-producing countries to set and maintain production levels for oil;
the level of excess production capacity;
the discovery rate of new oil and natural gas reserves;
domestic and global political and economic uncertainty, socio-political unrest and instability, terrorism or hostilities;
weather conditions and changes in weather patterns, including summer and winter temperatures that impact demand;
the availability, proximity and capacity of transportation facilities;
oil refining capacity and shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency;
the level and effect of trading in commodity futures markets, including trading by commodity price speculators and others;
demand for and availability of alternative, competing sources of energy;
the extent to which taxes, tax credits, environmental regulations, auctions of mineral rights, drilling permits, drilling concessions, drilling moratoriums or other governmental regulations, actions or policies affect the production, cost of production, price or availability of petroleum products and alternative energy sources;
technological advances affecting energy exploration, production and consumption;
raw material inflation and availability;
availability of funds for exploration and development due to increased dividend payments and share repurchase programs. Numerous EP companies have increased the amount of their dividend payments and share repurchase programs, causing reduced available funds for exploration and development

The oil and gas industry has historically experienced periodic downturns, which have been characterized by significantly reduced demand for oilfield services and downward pressure on the prices we charge. Sustained lower oil and natural gas prices have led to a significant decrease in spending by our customers over the past several years, which have led to significantly decreased revenues. Further decreases in oil and natural gas prices could lead to further cuts in spending and potential lower revenues for us. Moreover, weakness in the oil and gas industry may adversely impact the financial position of our customers, which in turn could cause them to fail to pay amounts owed to us in a timely manner or at all. We expect continued volatility in both crude oil and natural gas prices (including the possibilities that such prices could remain at current levels or decline further for an extended period of time), as well as in the level of drilling and production related activities as a result of decisions of OPEC+ and other oil exporting nations regarding production, and the other factors listed above. Any of these events have affected, and could further affect, the demand for oil and natural gas and has and could further have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

Our business may also be affected by new sanctions and export controls targeting Russia and other responses to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

As a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, certain members of the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States, among others, have developed coordinated sanctions and export-control measure packages.

Based on actions taken and other public statements to date, these packages may include:

comprehensive financial sanctions against certain state-owned enterprises and Russian banks (including SWIFT cut-off);
a prohibition on transactions related to the Russian Central Bank;
additional designations of Russian individuals with significant business interests and government connections;
designations of individuals and entities involved in Russian military activities;
restrictions on investment in the Russian energy sector;
enhanced export controls and trade sanctions targeting Russia's import of certain goods and technology; and

11


Table of Contents

closure of airspace to Russian aircraft.

As the invasion of Ukraine continues, there can be no certainty regarding whether such governments or other governments will impose additional sanctions, export-controls or other economic or military measures against Russia. Although, we have minimal operational exposure in Russia, representing less than $0.1 million of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022, and we do not intend to commit further capital towards projects in Russia, the impact the invasion of Ukraine, including economic sanctions and export controls or additional war or military conflict, as well as potential responses to them by Russia, is currently unknown and they could adversely affect oil and gas companies, including many of which are our customers, as well as the global supply chain. In addition, the continuation of the invasion of Ukraine by Russia could lead to other disruptions, instability and volatility in global markets and industries, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

Our long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of our capital resources are difficult to predict at this time.

While we have a significant cash balance currently, we face uncertainty regarding the adequacy of our liquidity and capital resources over the long-term and have extremely limited, if any, access to additional financing. We cannot assure you that cash on hand, letters of credit under the Credit Facility, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to continue to fund our operations over the long-term.

Furthermore, turmoil in the credit and financial markets could adversely affect financial institutions, inhibit lending and limit our access to funding through borrowings under the Credit Facility or obtaining other financing in the public or private capital markets on terms we believe to be reasonable. Prevailing market conditions could be adversely affected by the ongoing disruptions in domestic or overseas sovereign or corporate debt markets, low commodity prices or other factors impacting our business, contractions or limited growth in the economy or other similar adverse economic developments in the U.S. or abroad. Instability in the global financial markets has from time to time resulted in periodic volatility in the capital markets. In addition, there has been a relatively recent increased focus of debt and equity capital providers on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) investing, and the energy industry faces growing negative sentiment in the market. This volatility, as well as this increased focus on ESG investing and growing negative sentiment, could limit our access to the credit markets, leading to higher borrowing costs or, in some cases, the inability to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Any such failure to obtain additional financing could jeopardize our ability to repay, refinance or reduce our debt obligations, or to meet our other financial commitments.

Restrictive covenants in the Credit Facility could limit our growth and our ability to finance our operations, fund our capital needs, respond to changing conditions and engage in other business activities that may be in our best interests.

The Credit Facility imposes operating and financial restrictions. Unless all loans are paid off and letters of credit outstanding are cash collateralized and the Credit Agreement terminated, these restrictions limit the ability to, among other things, subject to permitted exceptions:

incur additional indebtedness;
make investments or loans;
create liens;
consummate mergers and similar fundamental changes;
make restricted payments;
make investments in unrestricted subsidiaries; and
enter into transactions with affiliates.

The restrictions contained in the Credit Facility could:

limit the ability to plan for, or react to, market conditions, to meet capital needs or otherwise to restrict our activities or business plan; and
adversely affect the ability to finance our operations or to engage in other business activities that would be in our interest.

The Credit Facility includes provisions that require mandatory prepayment of outstanding borrowings and/or a borrowing base redetermination when there are asset dispositions over a certain threshold, which could limit the ability to generate liquidity from asset sales. Also, the Credit Facility requires compliance with a specified financial ratio if triggered by an event of default or availability beneath specified thresholds. The ability to comply with this ratio may be affected by events beyond our control and, as a result, this ratio may not be met in circumstances when it is tested. This financial ratio restriction could limit the ability to obtain future financings, make needed capital expenditures, withstand a continued downturn in our business or a downturn in the economy in general or otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. Declines in oil and natural gas prices could result in failure to meet one or more of the financial

12


Table of Contents

covenants under the Credit Facility, which could require refinancing or amendment of such obligations resulting in the payment of consent fees or higher interest rates or require a capital raise at an inopportune time or on terms not favorable.

A breach of any of these covenants or the inability to comply with the required financial ratios or financial condition tests could result in a default under the Credit Facility. A default under the Credit Facility, if not cured or waived, could result in acceleration of all indebtedness outstanding thereunder and/or a requirement to cash collateralize letters of credit issued thereunder.

Our business may be materially and adversely impacted by U.S. and global market and economic conditions, including impacts relating to inflation and supply chain disruptions.

Our revenue is derived from the services and products that we offer to major, national and independent oil and natural gas exploration and production companies around the world for the various phases of their respective well’s economic life cycles. Given the concentration of our business activities in the oil and gas industry, we will be particularly exposed to certain economic downturns. United States and global market and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and volatile due to many factors, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, component shortages and related supply chain challenges, geopolitical developments such as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, and increasing inflation rates and the responses by central banking authorities to control such inflation, among others.

General business and economic conditions that could affect us and our customers include fluctuations in economic growth, debt and equity capital markets, liquidity of the global financial markets, the availability and cost of credit, investor and consumer confidence, and the strength of the economies in which we and our customers operate. A weak economic environment could result in significant decreases in demand for our products and services, including the delay or cancellation of current or anticipated projects. In particular, rising inflation rates in the United States have begun to affect businesses across many industries, including ours, by increasing the costs of labor, equipment, parts, consumables and shipping. A high inflationary environment may also cause customers to defer or decrease their expenditures on the services and products that we provide. In addition, supply chain disruptions and delays, could adversely affect our ability to provide our services and deliver our products in a timely manner, which could impair our ability to meet customer demand and result in lost sales, increased supply chain costs or damage to our reputation. Any of foregoing these economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

There are operating hazards inherent in the oil and gas industry that could expose us to substantial liabilities.

Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and gas industry that may lead to property damage, personal injury, death or the discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. Many of these events are outside of our control. While our personnel has decreased significantly as a result of divestitures in connection with the Transformation Project, from time to time, personnel are injured or equipment or property is damaged or destroyed as a result of accidents, failed equipment, faulty products or services, failure of safety measures, uncontained formation pressures or other dangers inherent in oil and natural gas exploration, development and production. Any of these events can be the result of human error or purely accidental, and it may be difficult or impossible to definitively determine the ultimate cause of the event or whose personnel or equipment contributed thereto. All of these risks expose us to a wide range of significant health, safety and environmental risks and potentially substantial litigation claims for damages. With increasing frequency, our products and services are deployed in more challenging exploration, development and production locations. From time to time, customers and third parties may seek to hold us accountable for damages and costs incurred as a result of an accident, including pollution, even under circumstances where we believe we did not cause or contribute to the accident. Our insurance policies are subject to exclusions, limitations and other conditions, and may not protect us against liability for some types of events, including events involving a well blowout, or against losses from business interruption. Our insurance also may not cover losses associated with pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain insurance at levels of risk coverage or policy limits that we deem adequate or on terms that we deem commercially reasonable, or at all. Any damages or losses that are not covered by insurance, or are in excess of policy limits or subject to substantial deductibles or retentions, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not be fully indemnified against losses incurred due to catastrophic events.

As is customary in our industry, our contracts generally provide that we will indemnify and hold harmless our customers from any claims arising from personal injury or death of our employees, damage to or loss of our equipment, and pollution emanating from our equipment and services. Similarly, our customers generally agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any claims arising from personal injury or death of their employees, damage to or loss of their equipment or property, and pollution caused from their equipment or the well reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir). Our indemnification arrangements may not protect us in every case. For example, from time to time we may enter into contracts with less favorable indemnities or perform work without a contract

13


Table of Contents

that protects us. In addition, our indemnification rights may not fully protect us if we cannot prove that we are entitled to be indemnified or if the customer is bankrupt or insolvent, does not maintain adequate insurance or otherwise does not possess sufficient resources to indemnify us. In addition, our indemnification rights may be held unenforceable in some jurisdictions.

Our customers’ changing views on risk allocation could cause us to accept greater risk to win new business or could result in us losing business if we are not prepared to take such risks. To the extent that we accept such additional risk, and insure against it, our insurance premiums could rise.

The credit risks of our customer base could result in losses.

Many of our customers are oil and gas companies that from time to time face liquidity constraints as the commodity price environment changes. These customers impact our overall exposure to credit risk as they are also affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry conditions. If a significant number of our customers experience a prolonged business decline or disruptions, we may incur increased exposure to credit risk and bad debts.

We are subject to environmental and worker health and safety laws and regulations, which could reduce our business opportunities and revenue, and increase our costs and liabilities.

Our business is significantly affected by a wide range of environmental and worker health and safety laws and regulations in the areas in which we operate, including increasingly rigorous environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, water discharges and waste management. Generally, these laws and regulations have become more stringent and have sought to impose greater liability on a larger number of potentially responsible parties. The Macondo well explosion in 2010 resulted in additional regulation of our offshore operations, and similar onshore or offshore accidents in the future could result in additional increases in regulation. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, imposition of remedial requirements, permit revocations, requirements for additional pollution controls, and injunctions limiting or prohibiting some or all of our operations.

Environmental laws and regulations may provide for “strict liability” for remediation costs, damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety as a result of our conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or the conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior owners or operators or other third parties. Strict liability can render a party liable for damages without regard to negligence or fault on the part of the party. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances. For example, our well service and fluids businesses routinely involve the handling of significant amounts of waste materials, some of which are classified as hazardous substances. We also store, transport and use radioactive and explosive materials in certain of our operations. In addition, many of our current and former facilities are, or have been, used for industrial purposes. Accordingly, we could become subject to material liabilities relating to the containment and disposal of hazardous substances, oilfield waste and other waste materials, the use of radioactive materials, the use of underground injection wells, and to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as the result of exposures to, or releases of, hazardous substances. In addition, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, new domestic or foreign laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new or increased requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis of new or increased liabilities that could reduce our earnings and our cash available for operations.

In addition, we and our customers may need to apply for or amend facility permits or licenses from time to time with respect to storm water or wastewater discharges, waste handling, or air emissions relating to manufacturing activities or equipment operations, which subjects us and our customers to new or revised permitting conditions that may be onerous or costly to comply with.

Climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of greenhouse gases or incentivizing zero-carbon energy sources could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas our customers produce.

Increasing concerns that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) may endanger public health and produce climate changes with significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, droughts and other climatic events, have drawn significant attention from government agencies, environmental advocacy groups and technological initiatives aimed at reducing the use of hydrocarbons. In response, additional costly requirements and restrictions have been imposed on the oil and gas industry to regulate and reduce the emission of GHGs and transition to a global low carbon economy.

For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) includes billions of dollars in incentives for the development of renewable energy, clean hydrogen, clean fuels, electric vehicles, investments in advanced biofuels and supporting infrastructure and carbon capture and sequestration. These incentives could accelerate the transition of the economy away from the use of fossil fuels towards lower- or zero-carbon emissions alternatives, which could decrease demand for oil and gas and consequently adversely affect the business of our

14


Table of Contents

customers, thereby reducing demand for our services. In addition, the IRA imposes the first ever federal fee on the emission of GHGs through a methane emissions charge. Specifically, the IRA amends the Clean Air Act to impose a fee on the emission of methane that exceeds an applicable waste emissions threshold from sources required to report their GHG emissions to the EPA, including sources in the offshore and onshore petroleum and natural gas production and gathering and boosting source categories. The methane emissions charge would start in calendar year 2024 at $900 per ton of methane, increase to $1,200 in 2025 and be set at $1,500 for 2026 and each year after. Calculation of the fee is based on certain thresholds established in the IRA.

The EPA has also finalized a series of GHG monitoring, reporting and emissions control rules for the oil and natural gas industry, and almost half of the states have already taken measures to reduce emissions of GHGs primarily through the development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap-and-trade programs. Also, states have imposed increasingly stringent requirements related to the venting or flaring of gas during oil and gas operations. While we are subject to certain federal GHG monitoring and reporting requirements, our operations currently are not adversely impacted by existing federal, state and local climate change initiatives.

At the international level, in December 2015, the United States participated in the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France. The resulting Paris Agreement calls for the parties to undertake “ambitious efforts” to limit the average global temperature, and to conserve and enhance sinks and reservoirs of GHGs. The Agreement went into effect on November 4, 2016. The Paris Agreement establishes a framework for the parties to cooperate and report actions to reduce GHG emissions. Although the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020, President Biden issued an executive order on January 20, 2021 to rejoin the Paris Agreement, which went into effect on February 19, 2021. On April 21, 2021, the United States announced that it was setting an economy-wide target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels in 2030. In November 2021, in connection with the 26th Conference of the Parties in Glasgow, Scotland, the United States and other world leaders made further commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emission, including reducing global methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030. Furthermore, many state and local leaders have stated their intent to intensify efforts to support the international commitments.

Restrictions on emissions of methane or carbon dioxide that may be imposed could adversely affect the oil and natural gas industry by reducing demand for hydrocarbons and by making it more expensive to develop and produce hydrocarbons, either of which could have a material adverse effect on future demand for our services.

In addition, our customers are also requiring additional equipment upgrades to address the growing concerns of GHG emission and climate change which result in higher operational costs for service providers such as us.

In addition, there have also been efforts in recent years to influence the investment community, including investment advisors and certain sovereign wealth, pension and endowment funds promoting divestment of fossil fuel equities and pressuring lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Such environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting climate change and reducing air pollution could interfere with our business activities, operations and ability to access capital. Furthermore, claims have been made against certain energy companies alleging that GHG emissions from oil and natural gas operations constitute a public nuisance under federal and/or state common law. As a result, private individuals or public entities may seek to enforce environmental laws and regulations against certain energy companies and could allege personal injury, property damages or other liabilities. While our business is not a party to any such litigation, we could be named in actions making similar allegations. An unfavorable ruling in any such case could significantly impact our operations and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

At this stage, we cannot predict the impact of these or other initiatives on our or our customers’ operations, nor can we predict whether, or which of, other currently pending GHG emission proposals will be adopted, or what other actions may be taken by domestic or international regulatory bodies. The potential passage of climate change laws or regulations may curtail production and demand for fossil fuels such as oil and gas in areas of the world where our customers operate and thus adversely affect future demand for our products and services, which may in turn adversely affect future results of operations.

Continuing or worsening inflationary pressures and associated changes in monetary policy have resulted in and may result in additional increases to our operating costs, which in turn have caused and may continue to cause our capital expenditures and operating costs to rise.

The U.S. inflation rate increased in 2021 and 2022 and may continue to increase in 2023. These inflationary pressures have resulted in and may result in additional increases to our operating costs, which in turn have caused and may continue to cause our capital expenditures and operating costs to rise. Sustained levels of high inflation have likewise caused the Federal Reserve and other central banks to increase interest rates, which could have the effects of raising the cost of capital and depressing economic growth, either of which - or the combination thereof - could hurt the financial and operating results of our business.

15


Table of Contents

Adverse and unusual weather conditions may affect our operations.

Our operations may be materially affected by severe weather conditions in areas where we operate. Severe weather, such as hurricanes, high winds and seas, blizzards and extreme temperatures may cause evacuation of personnel, curtailment of services and suspension of operations, inability to deliver materials to jobsites in accordance with contract schedules, loss of or damage to equipment and facilities and reduced productivity. In addition, variations from normal weather patterns can have a significant impact on demand for oil and natural gas, thereby reducing demand for our services and equipment.

Our inability to retain key employees and skilled workers could adversely affect our operations.

Our performance could be adversely affected, especially in light of our emergence from bankruptcy, if we are unable to retain certain key employees and skilled technical personnel. Our ability to continue to expand the scope of our services and products depends in part on our ability to increase the size of our skilled labor force. The loss of the services of key employees or the inability to employ or retain skilled technical personnel could adversely affect our operating results. In the past, the demand for skilled personnel has been high and the supply limited. We have experienced increases in labor costs in recent years and may continue to do so in the future. Furthermore, these internal and external factors may also be impacted by our recent emergence from bankruptcy, the uncertainties currently facing us and the business environment and changes we may make to the organizational structure to adjust to changing circumstances.

We face significant competition in attracting and retaining talented employees. Further, managing succession for, and retention of, key executives is critical to our success, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our future performance.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified and experienced employees is essential to meet our current and future goals and objectives. There is no guarantee we will be able to attract and retain such employees or that competition among potential employers will not result in increased salaries or other benefits. If we are unable to retain existing employees or attract additional employees, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We may not be able to locate or employ on acceptable terms qualified replacements for key executives if their services are no longer available. Furthermore, our business could be affected adversely if suitable replacement personnel are not recruited quickly or effectively. Our failure to adequately plan for succession of senior management and other key management roles or the failure of key employees to successfully transition into new roles could have a material adverse effect on our businesses and results of operations.

Our international operations and revenue are affected by political, economic and other uncertainties worldwide.

Our international operations are subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the foreign jurisdictions in which we provide services. Local laws and regulations, and their interpretation and enforcement, differ significantly among those jurisdictions, and can change significantly over time. Future regulatory, judicial and legislative changes or interpretations may have a material adverse effect on our ability to deliver services within various foreign jurisdictions.

In addition to these international regulatory risks, our international operations are subject to a number of other risks inherent in any business operating in foreign countries, including, but not limited to, the following:

political, social and economic instability;
potential expropriation, seizure, deprivation, confiscation or nationalization of assets, or other governmental actions;
inflation;
deprivation of contract rights;
increased operating costs;
inability to collect receivables and longer receipt of payment cycles;
social unrest and protests, strikes, acts of terrorism, war or other armed conflict;
import-export quotas or restrictions, including tariffs and the risk of fines or penalties assessed for violations;
confiscatory taxation or other adverse tax policies;
currency exchange controls;
currency exchange rate fluctuations, devaluations and conversion restrictions;
potential submission of disputes to the jurisdiction of a foreign court or arbitration panel;
pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, or epidemics that disrupt our ability to transport personnel or equipment;
embargoes or other restrictive governmental actions that could limit our ability to operate in foreign countries;
trade and economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed by the European Union, the United States or other regions or countries;

16


Table of Contents

additional U.S. and other regulation of non-domestic operations, including regulation under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) as well as other anti-corruption laws;
restrictions on the repatriation of funds;
limitations in the availability, amount or terms of insurance coverage;
the risk that our international customers may have reduced access to credit because of higher interest rates, reduced bank lending or a deterioration in our customers’ or their lenders’ financial condition;
the burden of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws and regulations;
the imposition of unanticipated or increased environmental and safety regulations or other forms of public or governmental regulation that increase our operating expenses;
complications associated with installing, operating and repairing equipment in remote locations;
theft of, or lack of sufficient legal protection for, proprietary technology and other intellectual property;
the geographic, time zone, language and cultural differences among personnel in different areas of the world; and
challenges in staffing and managing international operations.

These and the other risks outlined above could cause us to curtail or terminate operations, result in the loss of personnel or assets, disrupt financial and commercial markets and generate greater political and economic instability in some of the geographic areas in which we operate. International areas where we operate that have significant risk include the Middle East, Indonesia, Nigeria and Angola.

Laws, regulations or practices in foreign countries could materially restrict our operations or expose us to additional risks.

In many countries around the world where we do business, all or a significant portion of the decision making regarding procuring our services and products is controlled by state-owned oil companies. State-owned oil companies or prevailing laws may (i) require us to meet local content or hiring requirements or other local standards, (ii) restrict with whom we can contract or (iii) otherwise limit the scope of operations that we can legally or practically conduct. Our inability or failure to meet these requirements, standards or restrictions may adversely impact our operations in those countries. In addition, our ability to work with state-owned oil companies is subject to our ability to negotiate and agree upon acceptable contract terms, and to enforce those terms. In addition, many state-owned oil companies may require integrated contracts or turnkey contracts that could require us to provide services outside our core businesses. Providing services on an integrated or turnkey basis generally requires us to assume additional risks.

Moreover, in order to effectively compete in certain foreign jurisdictions, it is frequently necessary or required to establish joint ventures or strategic alliances with local contractors, partners or agents. In certain instances, these local contractors, partners or agents may have interests that are not always aligned with ours. Reliance on local contractors, partners or agents could expose us to the risk of being unable to control the scope or quality of our overseas services or products, or being held liable under the FCPA, or other anti-corruption laws for actions taken by our strategic or local contractors, partners or agents even though these contractors, partners or agents may not themselves be subject to the FCPA or other applicable anti-corruption laws. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, reputation or prospects.

If we are not able to design, develop, and produce commercially competitive products and to implement commercially competitive services in a timely manner in response to changes in the market, customer requirements, competitive pressures, and technology trends, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The market for oilfield services in which we operate is highly competitive and includes numerous small companies capable of competing effectively in our markets on a local basis, as well as several large companies that possess substantially greater financial resources than we do. Contracts are traditionally awarded on the basis of competitive bids or direct negotiations with customers.

The market for our services and products is characterized by continual technological developments to provide better and more reliable performance and services. If we are not able to design, develop, and produce commercially competitive products and to implement commercially competitive services in a timely manner in response to changes in the market, customer requirements, competitive pressures, and technology trends, our business and consolidated results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Likewise, if our proprietary technologies, equipment, facilities, or work processes become obsolete, we may no longer be competitive, and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we may be disadvantaged competitively and financially by a significant movement of exploration and production operations to areas of the world in which we are not currently active.

We depend on particular suppliers and are vulnerable to product shortages and price increases.

Some of the materials that we use are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases, supply chain disruptions, inferior quality and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply in a timely

17


Table of Contents

manner. We do not have long-term contracts with most of these sources, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these sources could have a negative impact on our results of operations and could damage our customer relationships. Further, a significant increase in the price of one or more of these materials could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Estimates of our potential liabilities relating to our oil and natural gas property may be incorrect.

Actual abandonment expenses may vary substantially from those estimated by us and any significant variance in these assumptions could materially affect the estimated liability recorded in our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, the risk exists we may underestimate the cost of plugging wells and abandoning production facilities. If costs of abandonment are materially greater than our estimates, this could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Potential changes of Bureau of Ocean Energy Management security and bonding requirements for offshore platforms could impact our operating cash flows and results of operations.

Federal oil and natural gas leases contain standard terms and require compliance with detailed Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) and BOEM regulations and orders issued pursuant to various federal laws, including the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. In 2016, BOEM undertook a review of its historical policies and procedures for determining a lessee’s ability to decommission platforms on the Outer Continental Shelf (“OCS”) and whether lessees should furnish additional security, and in July 2016, BOEM issued a new Notice to Lessees requiring additional security for decommissioning activities. In January 2017, BOEM extended the implementation timeline for properties with co-lessees by an additional six months, and in mid-2017 announced that the Notice to Lessees would be stayed while BOEM continued to review its implementation issues and continued industry engagement to gather additional information on the financial assurance program.

During the second half of 2016, BSEE increased its estimates of many offshore operator’s decommissioning costs, including the decommissioning costs at our sole federal offshore oil and gas property, in which our subsidiary owns a 51% non-operating interest. In October 2016, BOEM sent an initial proposal letter to the operator of the oil and gas property, proposing an increase in the supplemental bonding requirement for the property’s sole fixed platform that was eight to ten times higher than the revised supplemental bonding requirement requested for any other deep-water fixed platform in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Both the operator and our subsidiary submitted formal dispute notices, asserting that the estimates in the October 2016 proposal letter may be based on erroneous or arbitrary estimates of the potential decommissioning costs, and requesting in-person meetings to discuss the estimate. We asked that BSEE and BOEM reduce the estimate to an amount that more closely approximates actual decommissioning costs, consistent with estimates identified by BSEE and BOEM for similar deep-water platforms. BSEE and BOEM have not yet responded to our dispute notice.

On October 16, 2020, BOEM published a proposed rule addressing OCS oil and gas decommissioning costs (BOEM-2018-0033). The proposed rule contains updated criteria for determining decommissioning costs. Under the proposed rule, BOEM would only require additional security when (1) a lessee or grant holder poses a substantial risk of becoming financially unable to meet its obligations; (2) there is no co-lessee, co-grant holder or predecessor that is liable for those obligations with sufficient financial capacity; and (3) the property is at or near the end of its productive life. BSEE would typically issue orders to predecessors in title in a reverse chronological order. The proposed rule would also require that a party appealing any final decommissioning decision or order provide a surety bond to ensure that funding for decommissioning is available if the order is affirmed and the liable party then defaults. Based on the proposed framework, BOEM estimates its amount of financial assurance would decrease from $3.3 billion to $3.1 billion, although BOEM expects the rule would provide greater protection as the financial assurance would be focused on the riskiest properties.

We cannot predict when these laws and regulations may be adopted or change in the future. If BOEM withdraws the October 2020 rule proposal and proceeds to implement a rule or other regulatory action requiring additional security similar to the Notice to Lessees issued in July 2016 and we are unable to obtain the additional required bonds or post other acceptable security to secure of decommissioning obligations, BOEM may suspend or cancel operations at the oil and gas property or otherwise impose monetary penalties. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating cash flows and liquidity.

Moreover, under existing BOEM and BSEE rules relating to assignment of offshore leases and other legal interests on the OCS, assignors of such interests may be held jointly and severally liable for decommissioning of OCS facilities existing at the time the assignment was approved by BOEM, in the event that the assignee or any subsequent assignee is unable or unwilling to conduct required decommissioning.

Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock

There may be circumstances in which the interests of our significant stockholders could conflict with the interests of our other stockholders.

18


Table of Contents

On the Emergence Date, in order to implement certain transactions contemplated by the Plan, the Stockholders Agreement was executed with each stockholder pursuant to the Plan (constituting all of the stockholders on the Emergence Date) and all other stockholders from time to time, to provide for certain of our governance matters. As of March 1, 2023, two groups of these stockholders currently hold approximately 61.6% of our Class A Common Stock. Furthermore, pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, these two groups of stockholders have appointed three of our six directors.

Circumstances may arise in which these groups of stockholders may have an interest in pursuing or preventing acquisitions, divestitures or other transactions, including the issuance of additional shares or debt, that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us, and their interests may not in all cases be aligned with our interests.

There is no public market for shares of our Class A Common Stock, and we do not expect there to be a market for shares of our Class A Common Stock.

There is no existing trading market for shares of our Class A Common Stock, and no market for our shares may develop in the future. If developed, any such market may not be sustained. In the absence of a trading market, our stockholders may be unable to liquidate an investment in our Class A Common Stock. Upon our emergence from bankruptcy, the Predecessor’s common stock was canceled and we issued new Class A Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock is not currently traded on a national securities exchange. There is no active market in the Class A Common Stock. No assurance can be given that an active market will develop for our Class A Common Stock or as to the liquidity of the trading market for our Class A Common Stock. Our Class A Common Stock may be traded only infrequently, if at all, and reliable market quotations may not be available. Holders of our Class A Common Stock may experience difficulty in reselling, or an inability to sell, their shares. In addition, if an active trading market does not develop or is not maintained, significant sales of our Class A Common Stock, or the expectation of these sales, could materially and adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock. For so long as our Class A Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, our ability to access equity markets, obtain financing and provide equity incentives could be negatively impaired. Furthermore, certain transfers of our Class A Common Stock require an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

Provisions in the Stockholders Agreement could delay or prevent a change in control.

Certain provisions of our Stockholders Agreement may delay, discourage, prevent or render more difficult an attempt to obtain control of us, whether through a tender offer, business combination, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions include, among other things, those that:

permit two groups of our stockholders to elect up to three members of our Board of Directors and limit the removal of such directors; and
restrict certain transfers (including acquisitions and dispositions) of our securities.

Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is restricted.

We declared a special dividend of $12.45 per share of our Class A Common Stock that was paid on December 28, 2022 to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 16, 2022. Our Board of Directors continuously evaluates opportunities to pay dividends in accordance with our evolving strategic outlook. As a result, our decision to declare or any cash dividends on our Class A Common Stock in the foreseeable future is unknown. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, industry trends and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Any such decision will also be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our current and future indebtedness.

We do not have a class of our securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. Until we do, we will not be required to provide certain reports to our stockholders.

We do not have a class of our securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Until we do, we will not be required to provide certain reports to our stockholders. We are currently required to file periodic reports with the SEC by virtue of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. However, until we register a class of our securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, we are not subject to the SEC’s proxy rules, and large holders of our capital stock will not be subject to beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Sections 13 or 16 of the Exchange Act and their related rules. As a result, our stockholders and

19


Table of Contents

potential investors may not have available to them as much or as robust information as they may have if and when we become subject to those requirements.

General Risk Factors

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, litigation and other proceedings that could ultimately be resolved against us, requiring material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition or results of operations.

The size, nature and complexity of our business make us susceptible to various claims, both in litigation and binding arbitration proceedings. We may in the future become subject to various claims, which, if not resolved within amounts we have accrued, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, during periods of depressed market conditions we may be subject to an increased risk of our customers, vendors, former employees and others initiating legal proceedings against us.

Any litigation or claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future.

Changes in tax laws or tax rates, adverse positions taken by taxing authorities and tax audits could impact our operating results.

We are subject to taxation in a significant number of domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws or tax rates, the resolution of tax assessments or audits by various tax authorities could impact our operating results. In addition, we may periodically restructure our legal entity organization. If taxing authorities were to disagree with our tax positions in connection with any such restructurings, our effective income tax rate could be impacted. The final determination of our income tax liabilities involves the interpretation of local tax laws, tax treaties and related authorities in each taxing jurisdiction, as well as the significant use of estimates and assumptions regarding future operations and results and the timing of income and expenses. We may be audited and receive tax assessments from taxing authorities that may result in assessment of additional taxes that are ultimately resolved with the authorities or through the courts. We believe these assessments may occasionally be based on erroneous and even arbitrary interpretations of local tax law. Resolution of any tax matter involves uncertainties and there are no assurances that the outcomes will be favorable. If U.S. or other foreign tax authorities change applicable tax laws, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, financial condition or results of operating may be adversely impacted.

The IRA 2022 imposes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) on the “adjusted financial statement income” of certain large corporations (generally, corporations reporting at least $1 billion average adjusted pre-tax net income on their consolidated financial statements) as well as an excise tax of 1% on the fair market value of certain public company stock repurchases for tax years

beginning after December 31, 2022.

Currently, we do not believe the CAMT, or any of the other tax provisions, will have a material impact on us for 2023, however, we will continue to monitor the future impact to us related to this new law. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service and other standard-setting bodies are expected to issue guidance on how the CAMT, stock buyback excise tax and other provisions of the IRA 2022 will be applied or otherwise administered that may differ from our interpretations.

An ownership change could limit our use of net operating losses arising prior to an ownership change.

If we were to experience an “ownership change,” as determined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), our ability to offset taxable income arising after the ownership change with net operating losses (“NOLs”) arising prior to the ownership change would be limited, possibly substantially. An ownership change would establish an annual limitation on the amount of our pre‑change NOLs we could utilize to offset our taxable income in any future taxable year to an amount generally equal to the value of our stock immediately prior to the ownership change multiplied by the long term tax‑exempt rate. In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative increase in our ownership of more than 50 percentage points by one or more “5% shareholders” (as defined in the Code) at any time during a rolling three‑year period.

We experienced an “ownership change” on February 2, 2021 due to the Plan that subject certain of our tax attributes, including our NOLs and other carryforwards, to an annual limitation under Section 382 of the Code. However, we do not expect the Section 382 limitation to impact our ability to use U.S. tax attributes. Calculations pursuant to Section 382 of the Code can be very complicated and no assurance can be given that upon further analysis, our ability to take advantage of our NOLs may be limited to a greater extent than we currently anticipate. As of December 31, 2022, we had NOLs of $367.9 million. Future changes in our stock ownership could result in an additional ownership change.

20


Table of Contents

Our ability to remediate the identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as we did not design and maintain effective controls to review the reasonableness of assumptions determined by, and accuracy of calculations performed by, our external tax service providers. If we are not able to remediate the material weakness and otherwise to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our financial statements may be materially misstated and investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We are working to remediate the material weakness and are taking steps to strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. While we are undertaking efforts to remediate this material weakness, the material weakness will not be considered remediated until our remediation plan has been fully implemented, the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and we have concluded, through testing, that the newly implemented and enhanced controls are operating effectively. At this time, we cannot predict the success of such efforts or the outcome of our assessment of the remediation efforts. We cannot assure you that our efforts will remediate this material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future.

We are affected by global economic factors and political events.

Our financial results depend on demand for our services and products in the U.S. and the international markets in which we operate. Declining economic conditions, negative perceptions about economic conditions, energy costs and supply chain disruptions, could result in a substantial decrease in demand for our services and products. World political events could also result in further U.S. military actions, terrorist attacks and related unrest. Military action by the U.S. or other nations could escalate and further acts of terrorism may occur in the U.S. or elsewhere. Such acts of terrorism could lead to, among other things, a loss of our investment in the country, impairment of the safety of our employees, extortion or kidnapping, and impairment of our ability to conduct our operations. Such developments have caused instability in the world’s financial and insurance markets in the past, and many experts believe that a confluence of worldwide factors could result in a prolonged period of economic uncertainty and slow growth in the future. In addition, any of these developments could lead to increased volatility in prices for oil and gas and could negatively affect the markets for our products and services. Insurance premiums could also increase and coverages may be unavailable.

Uncertain economic conditions and instability make it particularly difficult for us to forecast demand trends. The timing and extent of any changes to currently prevailing market conditions is uncertain and may affect demand for many of our services and products. Consequently, we may not be able to accurately predict future economic conditions or the effect of such conditions on demand for our services and products and our results of operations or financial condition.

Our operations may be subject to cyber-attacks that could have an adverse effect on our business operations.

Like most companies, we rely heavily on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, to manage or support a variety of our business operations, and to maintain various records, which may include information regarding our customers, employees or other third parties, and the integrity of these systems are essential for us to conduct our business and operations. We make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of information and systems (and maintain contingency plans in the event of security breaches or system disruptions). However, we cannot provide assurance that our security efforts and measures will prevent security threats from materializing, unauthorized access to our systems, loss or destruction of data, account takeovers, or other forms of cyber-attacks or similar events, whether caused by mechanical failures, human error, fraud, malice, sabotage or otherwise. We have office employees who work remotely. Remote work relies heavily on the use of remote networking and online conferencing services that enable employees to work outside of our corporate infrastructure and, in some cases, use their own personal devices, which exposes us to additional cybersecurity risks, including unauthorized access to sensitive information as a result of increased remote access and other cybersecurity related incidents. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. It is possible that our business, financial and other systems could be compromised, which could go unnoticed for a prolonged period of time. While various procedures and controls are being utilized to mitigate exposure to such risk, there can be no assurance that the procedures and controls that we implement, or which we cause third party service providers to implement, will be sufficient to protect our systems, information or other property. Additionally, customers as well as other third parties whom we rely on face similar cybersecurity threats, which could directly or indirectly impact our business and operations. The frequency, scope and sophistication of cyber-attacks continue to grow, which increases the possibility that our security measures will be unable to prevent our systems’ improper functioning or the improper disclosure of proprietary information. Any failure of our

21


Table of Contents

information or communication systems, whether caused by attacks, mechanical failures, natural disasters or otherwise, could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, or subject us to claims, any of which could materially adversely affect us.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Information on properties is contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time we are involved in various legal actions incidental to our business. However, based on current circumstances, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, including any such proceedings described in the following two paragraphs hereof, after considering available defenses and any insurance coverage or indemnification rights, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

A subsidiary of ours is involved in legal proceedings with two former employees regarding the payment of royalties for a patentable product paid for by the subsidiary and developed while they worked for the subsidiary. Those former employees have filed two separate lawsuits in the Harris County District Court, in which the former employees allege that the royalty payments they had invoiced at 25% and for which they received payments in the invoiced amounts since 2010, instead should have been paid at a rate of 50%. The first lawsuit (the “First Case”), filed during the second quarter of 2018, sought to recover alleged unpaid royalties from May 2014 through May 2019. The second lawsuit (the “Second Case”) was filed in the same district court against the same subsidiary of ours, brought the same claims, and sought damages post-judgment from the First Case until the discontinuation of the leasing of the product at issue by the subsidiary at the end of 2019.

In both lawsuits, the district court ruled against our subsidiary and entered final judgments, which we fully secured with a bond. We strongly disagreed with the result and believed the district court committed several legal errors that should be corrected by reversal of each of the judgments. Accordingly, we pursued separate appeals in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

In August 2022, in the appeal from the judgment in the First Case, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals (the "Court of Appeals") ruled in favor of our subsidiary on the plaintiffs’ claims for a combined 50% royalty. The Court of Appeals ruled that because the plaintiffs invoiced our subsidiary for a combined 25% royalty and accepted payments in that amount every month since 2010, the plaintiffs forever waived any claim to any royalties in any amount other than a combined 25% royalty, net of expenses. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment in the First Case and remanded to the district court to assess damages, if any, owed for royalties between January 2018 and May 2019.

The appeal from the judgment in the Second Case was abated by the Court of Appeals pending the resolution of the appeal in the First Case.

On October 7, 2022, our subsidiary reached a confidential settlement in both the First Case and the Second Case with the plaintiffs to resolve any and all disputes between them. At the request of both parties in the appeals from both the First Case and the Second Case, the Court of Appeals has reversed the respective judgments entered by the district court. The district court has now entered take-nothing judgments in favor of our subsidiary in both cases and has released the supersedeas bonds filed by our subsidiary in both cases. Accordingly, both the First Case and the Second Case are fully and finally resolved.

Our Indian subsidiary, SES Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd (“SES India”), entered into a contract with an Indian oil and gas company to provide an offshore vessel for well stimulation. A dispute arose over the performability of the terms of the contract. The contract was terminated by the customer. Any remaining contingency under this contract was terminated in connection with SES India entering into bankruptcy during 2022.

In October 2022, we had a hearing before the Washington State Board of Tax Appeals (the “Tax Board”) in relation to a dispute arising in April 2019 pertaining to a use tax assessment from 2016 as a result of the construction of a vessel by one of our subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2022, the assessment, including interest, totaled $26.9 million. While we are confident that the assessment is legally insupportable, if the Tax Board upholds the assessment we will be responsible for payment of the full assessment within thirty days of the decision. Although we are unable to estimate the probability of the outcome of this matter or the range of reasonably possible loss, if any, we have reserved an amount we believe to be adequate to cover any final assessment levied by the state.

22


Table of Contents

For the disclosure of environmental proceedings with a governmental entity as a party pursuant to Item 103(c)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K, we have elected to disclose matters where we reasonably believe such proceeding would result in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, of $1.0 million or more.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

23


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common equity consists of common stock that is privately held and there is no established public trading market. As of March 1, 2023, there were 583 stockholders of record for our Class A common stock and seven stockholders of record for our Class B common stock.

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) have approved and adopted our Management Incentive Plan, which provides for the grant of share-based and cash-based awards and, in connection therewith, the issuance from time to time of up to 1,999,869 shares of our Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Dividend Policy

On November 16, 2022, we announced that our Board declared a special cash dividend of $12.45 per share of our outstanding Class A common stock. Additionally, the Board determined that, in addition to the special cash dividend to shareholders of our Class A common stock, we would make dividend equivalent payments to each holder of unvested restricted stock units. The special dividend was paid on December 28, 2022.

Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board and will depend on, among other things, our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, industry trends and other factors that our Board may deem relevant. Any such decision will also be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our current and future indebtedness.

24


Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and applicable notes to our consolidated financial statements and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Risk Factors” disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, our actual results may differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Summary

General

Superior Energy Services is a global oilfield products and services company with a portfolio of premier rental and well services brands providing customers with robust inventory, responsive delivery, engineered solutions, and expert consultative service — all aligned with enterprise-wide Shared Core Values for safe, sustainable operations and corporate citizenship; and committed to free cash flow generation and value creation.

Superior Energy Services drives true value to its business units by providing enterprise-wide support, financial discipline, capital strength, and strategic focus. Our experienced, knowledgeable leadership within those businesses has excellent latitude to execute their business strategy, determine pricing, allocate inventory, and develop new products and technology. All with a focus on safety, operational excellence, competitive positioning, and financial performance that entrenches our relationships with our customers and elevates our customers' satisfaction.

Our execution of the transformation initiatives set forth in 2021 continued to be validated in 2022 with positive results. The transformation weighted our product offerings toward businesses critical to our customer’s oil and gas operations. These businesses have limited competition with the three largest global oilfield service companies; require deep technical expertise, notably in premium drill pipe and bottom hole assembly rentals; and have strong cash flow generating capacity as was delivered in our 2022 results.

Our ongoing strategy of focusing operations on businesses with solid market positions along with the strength of our brands, their leaders, and teams contributed in no small part to our positive performance, margin expansion, and strong competitive position in 2022 overcoming labor market and supply chain challenges and being an early mover on effective pricing strategies to address cost inflation and margin expansion.

As we strive to be good stewards of our resources, we paid a $250 million distribution and a return of capital to shareholders in December 2022.

Our portfolio of companies operate in two segments, Rentals and Well Services, to provide highly specialized solutions to the upstream oil and gas industry.

Rentals Segment

Our rental services include premium downhole tubulars and drill pipe, design, engineering and manufacturing of bottomhole assembly accessories, and offshore accommodation units. Collaborating closely with customers and strategic suppliers, we also provide engineered solutions to meet their challenges.

Workstrings International ("WSI")

WSI is a global leader in oilfield equipment rentals providing high-quality, premium connection drill strings, tubing, completion tubulars, and handling accessories and has one of the industry’s most extensive inventories of highly specialized landing string designed for deep water applications.

Workstrings’ long-tenured leadership assures a high level of knowledge and skill in providing quality service and engineering expertise to develop complementary innovation and new technologies for our long-term major customers.

WSI is strategically positioned to respond globally with a focus on U.S. Onshore and Offshore Gulf of Mexico, and International Offshore opportunities with a variety of sizes and premium thread configurations complimented by in-house inspection and on-site machining capabilities expediting turnaround and deliveries.

25


Table of Contents

WSIs' depth of inventory resulting from consistent investments through the cycles, seasoned field experience, in-house engineering expertise and long standing relationships with strategic suppliers enables customer relationships that make it a leading provider in the GOM and international markets with a focus on continued innovation that is difficult to replicate. Capital expenditures over the next year to maintain our existing fleet is expected to be similar to our 2022 capital expenditures assuming that the second half 2022 activity levels and current drilling and completion practices continue throughout 2023.

Stabil Drill

Stabil Drill provides comprehensive Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) support, ranging from custom component engineering and fabrication to rental drilling tools and repairs. With an inventory of more than 50,000 downhole tools, extensive experience, state-of-the-art facilities, and cutting-edge solutions, Stabil Drill helps operators optimize performance on the most challenging drilling operations.

With significant US Land capabilities deployable to Offshore and International markets, Stabil Drill serves customers worldwide and is poised for growth opportunities with existing customers and through geographic expansion of product offerings.

In-house manufacturing, repair services, and efficient fleet management practices effectively mitigated supply chain challenges and maintained leading market share positions in US Land and select Latin American regions.

HB Rentals

HB Rentals’ offerings span a wide breadth of offshore rentals, from single living quarters to complete multi-module complexes and support infrastructure.

Their comprehensive support for offshore services includes initial consulting and design, project management, engineering, custom fabrication, logistics planning, installation, and commissioning. HB Rentals has opportunities for fleet expansion within the US wind market and defense projects along with plug and abandonment (“P&A”) opportunities in GOM.

Well Services Segment

Our well services include long standing, industry leading brands with a long history of strong, collaborative relationships with customers and suppliers.

Services include risk management, well control and training, hydraulic workover and snubbing, engineering, and manufacturing of premium completion tools including the Multi-zone, single trip (MST) sand control system. The Well Services segment also provides cementing, wireline, and coil tubing services with operations in Latin America and Kuwait.

Wild Well Control ("WWC")

WWC provides advanced engineering solutions, unconventional intervention, personnel, equipment, and well control training. WWC provides IADC well control training for operators and students worldwide. Additional WWC services include assisting operators in risk management, planning, preparedness, prevention, and response services.

As a leading global provider of onshore and offshore well control emergency response, pressure control, relief well planning, engineering, and well control training services, with the largest team of dedicated professionals and inventory of well control equipment staged for deployment around the world, WWC responds to the majority of the well control emergency responses worldwide.

WWC continues to develop opportunities by leveraging its global Subsea Capping response consortium WellCONTAINED. WWC also continues to pursue additional engineering capabilities and capacity and has brought its well control expertise to consult and advise on future carbon capture projects through its industry relationships with major oil companies.

Superior Completion Services

Superior Completion Services provides strategic solutions and expertise in downhole completion services primarily focused on offshore sand control applications, including deep water Gulf of Mexico and Brazil projects utilizing its Multi-zone single trip system (“MST”).

26


Table of Contents

Capabilities beyond multi-zone single-trip systems include intelligent completions, gravel and frac pack systems to HPHT packers, screens, flow, and barrier valves.

International Snubbing Services ("ISS")

Comprised of two geographical operating divisions: USA and Australia, ISS include manufacturing facilities in both locations with operational activity in 2023 shifting to a heavier weighting on P&A, which is seen as a growth market. Additional growth opportunities as Premier fixed-platform and Bass Strait P&A service provider in Australia and increasing well pull work onshore and P&A work in the GOM will be explored in 2023.

Strategic Outlook

We engaged Evercore as our financial advisor nearly a year ago to assist management and our Board in exploring alternatives to enhance shareholder value, including through potential merger or acquisition opportunities. As part of this process, we remain in and continue to pursue preliminary or exploratory dialogue with various potential counterparties. We are allocating resources accordingly should strategic alternatives to grow shareholder value, including meaningful consolidation opportunities, become actionable in 2023. Such opportunities may include, but are not limited to, an acquisition by or merger with a publicly traded company, one or more acquisitions of or mergers with private energy service companies, or growth through the acquisition of an additional strategic product line, either in connection with or following an exchange listing by us. Our Board has not set a timetable or made any decisions related to further actions or potential strategic alternatives at this time. Additionally, any potential transaction would depend upon entry into definitive agreements with a potential counterparty on terms acceptable to us. There can be no assurance that we will enter any such transaction or consummate or pursue any transaction or other strategic alternative.

As we focus our financial strength, flexibility, and leading market position on converting operating margins to free cash flow generation, we expect to continue to deliver what we believe are compelling returns and stewardship. We will maintain focus on executing the final phases of the transformation strategies accomplished in 2022 by reducing our geographic footprint and streamlining our operational support function to align with the current size of our operations. An opportunistic and disciplined approach to growth and strategic capital expenditure allocations are intended to ensure that our market-leading brands have the support and resources needed to meet the industry’s highest expectations and unlock opportunities enterprise-wide, while maintaining the highest standards of excellence and safety.

We focus on building a sustainable future through our commitment to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance. Our Shared Core Values are critical to achieving our ESG goals and helping our customers, suppliers, and business partners achieve theirs. We continue to advance our ESG performance for the benefit of stakeholders with plans to publish our ESG performance with transparency starting in 2024 with our inaugural 2023 Sustainability Report.

We will persist in advancing our strategic focus on efficiency, capital discipline, and sustainable performance characterized by cash flow generation, safe operations, reliable service delivery, and fair, responsible dealings in alignment with our Shared Core Values central to Superior’s culture.

27


Table of Contents

Industry Trends

The oil and gas industry is both cyclical and seasonal. The level of spending by oil and gas companies is highly influenced by current and expected demand as well as future prices of oil and natural gas. Changes in spending resulted in an increased or decreased demand for our services and products. Rig counts are an indicator of the level of spending by oil and gas companies.

Our financial performance is significantly affected by the rig count in the U.S. land and offshore market areas as well as oil and natural gas prices and worldwide rig count, which are summarized in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022 to 2021

 

 

 

 

2021 to 2020

 

 

2022

 

 

 

2021

 

 

% Change

 

2020

 

 

% Change

Worldwide Rig Count (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

708

 

 

 

 

464

 

 

52.6%

 

 

417

 

 

11.3%

Offshore

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

7.1%

 

 

16

 

 

(12.5%)

Total

 

 

723

 

 

-

 

 

478

 

 

51.3%

 

 

433

 

 

10.4%

International (2)

 

 

851

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

12.7%

 

 

825

 

 

(8.5%)

Worldwide Total

 

 

1,574

 

 

-

 

 

1,233

 

 

27.7%

 

 

1,258

 

 

(2.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity Prices (average)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude Oil (West Texas Intermediate)

 

$

94.90

 

 

 

$

68.14

 

 

39.3%

 

$

39.16

 

 

74.0%

Natural Gas (Henry Hub)

 

$

6.42

 

 

 

$

3.91

 

 

64.2%

 

$

2.03

 

 

92.6%

(1)
Estimate of drilling activity as measured by average active drilling rigs based on Baker Hughes Co. rig count information.
(2)
Excludes Canadian rig count.

28


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

The Successor Period and the Predecessor Period are distinct reporting periods as a result of our emergence from bankruptcy. References in these results of operations to changes in comparison to year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Current Period") combine the Successor Period and Predecessor Period results for year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Combined Period”) in order to provide some comparability of such information. While this combined presentation is not presented according to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and no comparable GAAP measures are presented, management believes that providing this financial information is the most relevant and useful method for making comparisons to the Current Period as reviewing the Successor Period results in isolation would not be useful in identifying trends in or reaching conclusions regarding our overall operating performance.

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

Non-GAAP

 

 

Change

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Combined Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

$

 

 

%

 Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rentals

 

$

402,942

 

 

$

268,695

 

 

 

$

18,339

 

 

$

287,034

 

 

$

115,908

 

 

40.4%

 Well Services

 

 

481,018

 

 

 

380,059

 

 

 

 

27,589

 

 

 

407,648

 

 

 

73,370

 

 

18.0%

 Total revenues

 

 

883,960

 

 

 

648,754

 

 

 

 

45,928

 

 

 

694,682

 

 

 

189,278

 

 

 

 Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rentals

 

 

137,626

 

 

 

105,373

 

 

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

113,212

 

 

 

24,414

 

 

21.6%

 Well Services

 

 

339,325

 

 

 

316,879

 

 

 

 

21,934

 

 

 

338,813

 

 

 

512

 

 

0.2%

 Total cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

476,951

 

 

 

422,252

 

 

 

 

29,773

 

 

 

452,025

 

 

 

24,926

 

 

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

98,060

 

 

 

219,859

 

 

 

 

8,358

 

 

 

228,217

 

 

 

(130,157

)

 

(57.0%)

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

128,294

 

 

 

117,575

 

 

 

 

11,052

 

 

 

128,627

 

 

 

(333

)

 

(0.3%)

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

6,375

 

 

 

22,952

 

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

24,222

 

 

 

(17,847

)

 

(73.7%)

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(29,134

)

 

 

16,726

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,726

 

 

 

5

 

 

**

 Income (loss) from operations

 

 

203,414

 

 

 

(150,610

)

 

 

 

(4,525

)

 

 

(155,135

)

 

 

312,684

 

 

 

 Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest income, net

 

 

11,713

 

 

 

2,331

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

2,533

 

 

 

9,180

 

 

362.4%

 Reorganization items, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

335,560

 

 

 

335,560

 

 

 

(335,560

)

 

(100.0%)

 Other income (expense)

 

 

(1,804

)

 

 

(7,128

)

 

 

 

(2,105

)

 

 

(9,233

)

 

 

7,429

 

 

**

 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

213,323

 

 

 

(155,407

)

 

 

 

329,132

 

 

 

173,725

 

 

 

(6,267

)

 

 

 Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

77,719

 

 

 

33,298

 

 

 

 

(60,003

)

 

 

(26,705

)

 

 

104,424

 

 

(391.0%)

 Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

291,042

 

 

 

(122,109

)

 

 

 

269,129

 

 

 

147,020

 

 

 

98,157

 

 

 

 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

 

(4,577

)

 

 

(40,069

)

 

 

 

(352

)

 

 

(40,421

)

 

 

35,844

 

 

(88.7%)

 Net income (loss)

 

$

286,465

 

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

268,777

 

 

$

106,599

 

 

$

134,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ** Not a meaningful percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We reported net income from continuing operations for the Current Period of $291.0 million on revenues of $884.0 million and $147.0 million on revenues of $694.7 million for the Combined Period. Net income from continuing operations for the Combined Period was driven primarily by a $335.6 million gain in reorganization items, net primarily due to debt forgiveness as part of our emergence from bankruptcy.

Revenues and Cost of Revenues

Revenues from our Rentals segment increased $115.9 million, or 40.4%, in the Current Period as compared to the Combined Period. Cost of revenues also increased $24.4 million, or 21.6%, as compared to the Combined Period. The increase in commodity prices led to an increase in capital expenditures by our customers which had an impact on rig count between periods. Additionally, greater utilization and higher pricing for both premium drill pipe and bottom hole assembly accessories, which allowed for a higher gross margin of 65.8% for the Current Period as compared to 60.6% for the Combined Period.

29


Table of Contents

Revenues from our Well Services segment increased $73.4 million, or 18.0%, in the Current Period. Cost of revenues increased $0.5 million, or 0.2%, in the Current Period as compared to the Combined Period. Gross margin for the Current Period increased to 29.5% as compared to 16.9% for the Combined Period due to changes in revenue mix in our completions applications, increases in service revenues with higher margins and a reduction in pass through and mobilization projects with lower margins. Additionally, the strategic shift from our more labor-intensive service businesses to U.S. offshore and international operations reduces our exposure to the most significant wage inflation pressures in this segment given our lower U.S. land headcount.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense for the December 31, 2022 decreased $130.2 million, or 57.0%, as compared to the Combined Period. Depreciation expense, primarily in the Combined Period, has been impacted by the valuation process under fresh start accounting, where certain fully depreciated assets were assigned a new estimated fair value and a new remaining useful life of less than 36 months.

Restructuring Expenses

Restructuring expenses were $6.4 million and $24.2 million during the December 31, 2022 and the Combined Period, respectively. This decrease is a result of severance expenses and costs related to executive officers that resigned during the Combined Period as well as professional fees associated with the Transformation Project (defined below) that were not as prevalent in the Current Period. In addition to Transformation Project costs, Current Period restructuring expenses also include legal and other professional fees related to certain tax and shareholder distribution matters.

Other (gains) and losses, net

Other gains, net for the Current Period were $29.1 million compared to other losses, net of $16.7 million in the Combined Period. Other (gains) and losses, net primarily relate to charges recorded as part of our strategic disposal of low margin assets in line with our efforts to reconfigure our organization both operationally and financially (the “Transformation Project”) and includes gains and losses on the disposal of assets, as well as impairments related to long-lived assets.

In the Current Period, other gains, net includes $23.6 million related to our Well Services segment, including a gain of $17.4 million from revisions to our decommissioning program to a reef-in-place program which significantly reduced the estimated costs associated with decommissioning our oil and gas property and $5.2 million related to our Rentals segment.

In the Combined Period, other losses, net comprised $13.1 million related to our Well Services segment, including approximately $11.7 million from exit activities related to SES Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd ("SES India"), and $3.6 million related to our Rentals segment. SES India was admitted into bankruptcy during the Current Period.

Interest Income, net

Interest income, net for December 31, 2022 was $11.7 million compared to $2.5 million for the Combined Period. The increase in interest income was driven by interest derived on overnight money market accounts primarily in Argentina and the United States.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) primarily relate to re-measurement gains and losses associated with our foreign currencies and realized and unrealized gains and losses on our investment in common stock of Select Energy Services, Inc. (“Select”).

Losses on foreign currencies during the Current Period and Combined Period were $12.6 million and $10.9 million, respectively. Losses on foreign currencies during the Current Period include an expense of $2.7 million which represents a correction of an immaterial error relating to a period prior to our emergence from bankruptcy. Gains and losses on foreign currencies are primarily related to our operations in Brazil and Argentina.

During the Current Period, we disposed of 4.1 million shares of Select for $34.7 million, and we recognized gains totaling $8.9 million in connection with these transactions. During the Combined Period, we disposed of 0.7 million shares of Select for $4.1 million, and we recognized gains totaling $0.4 million. Unrealized gains during the Combined Period were $2.1 million. As of December 31, 2022, all shares of Select had been disposed.

30


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the Current Period was a net benefit of 36.4% and a net expense of 21.4% and 18.2% for the Successor Period and the Predecessor Period, respectively. Expected tax in the Current Period would be a $44.8 million expense at the U.S. statutory rate of 21.0%. We recognized a worthless stock deduction for U.S. income tax purposes with an estimated net tax benefit of $104.0 million, the primary driver of the net reported Current Period effective tax benefit of $77.7 million. In addition, there were valuation allowance releases primarily for Brazil deferred tax assets and a portion of U.S. foreign tax credits offset by foreign losses for which no tax benefit was recorded resulting in net tax benefit of $18.5 million. The tax rate for the Combined Period is different from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% primarily from non-deductible items, foreign losses for which no tax benefit was recorded and the adoption of fresh start accounting during the period.

Our unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2022 was $14.0 million, all of which would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. It is reasonably possible $9.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits could be settled in the next twelve months due to the conclusion of tax audits or statutes of limitations expiration. It is our policy to recognize interest and applicable penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $4.6 million for the Current Period as compared to $40.4 million for the Combined Period. See Note 17 - Discontinued Operations to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

31


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Combined Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 

$

 

 

%

 Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rentals

 

$

268,695

 

 

 

$

18,339

 

 

$

287,034

 

 

$

297,835

 

 

$

(10,801

)

 

(3.6%)

 Well Services

 

 

380,059

 

 

 

 

27,589

 

 

 

407,648

 

 

 

369,414

 

 

 

38,234

 

 

10.3%

 Total revenues

 

 

648,754

 

 

 

 

45,928

 

 

 

694,682

 

 

 

667,249

 

 

$

27,433

 

 

4.1%

 Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rentals

 

 

105,373

 

 

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

113,212

 

 

 

109,902

 

 

 

3,310

 

 

3.0%

 Well Services

 

 

316,879

 

 

 

 

21,934

 

 

 

338,813

 

 

 

298,229

 

 

 

40,584

 

 

13.6%

 Total cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

422,252

 

 

 

 

29,773

 

 

 

452,025

 

 

 

408,131

 

 

 

43,894

 

 

10.8%

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

219,859

 

 

 

 

8,358

 

 

 

228,217

 

 

 

115,771

 

 

 

112,446

 

 

97.1%

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

117,575

 

 

 

 

11,052

 

 

 

128,627

 

 

 

205,773

 

 

 

(77,146

)

 

(37.5%)

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

22,952

 

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

24,222

 

 

 

47,055

 

 

 

(22,833

)

 

(48.5%)

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

16,726

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,726

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,726

 

 

**

 Reduction in value of assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

23,775

 

 

 

(23,775

)

 

(100.0%)

 Income (loss) from operations

 

 

(150,610

)

 

 

 

(4,525

)

 

 

(155,135

)

 

 

(133,256

)

 

 

(21,879

)

 

 

 Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 Interest income, net

 

 

2,331

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

2,533

 

 

 

(92,426

)

 

 

94,959

 

 

(102.7%)

 Reorganization items, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

335,560

 

 

 

335,560

 

 

 

(19,520

)

 

 

355,080

 

 

(1819.1%)

 Other income (expense)

 

 

(7,128

)

 

 

 

(2,105

)

 

 

(9,233

)

 

 

(9,229

)

 

 

(4

)

 

**

 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

(155,407

)

 

 

 

329,132

 

 

 

173,725

 

 

 

(254,431

)

 

 

428,156

 

 

 

 Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

33,298

 

 

 

 

(60,003

)

 

 

(26,705

)

 

 

26,888

 

 

 

(53,593

)

 

(199.3%)

 Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

(122,109

)

 

 

 

269,129

 

 

 

147,020

 

 

 

(227,543

)

 

 

374,563

 

 

 

 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

 

(40,069

)

 

 

 

(352

)

 

 

(40,421

)

 

 

(168,687

)

 

 

128,266

 

 

(76.0%)

 Net income (loss)

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

268,777

 

 

$

106,599

 

 

$

(396,230

)

 

$

502,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ** Not a meaningful percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations for the Combined Period was $106.6 million, which compares to a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the "Prior Period") of $396.2 million. The Combined Period net income was driven by recognition of a $335.6 million gain in Reorganization items, net primarily due to debt forgiveness as part of our emergence from bankruptcy. Also, the results for the Combined Period include a charge of $24.2 million related to restructuring activities and other losses, net of $16.7 million, which primarily relate to charges associated with asset disposals.

Revenues and Cost of Revenues

Revenue for the Combined Period was $694.7 million, an increase of $27.4 million, or 4.1%, from the Prior Period. Cost of revenues for the Combined Period was $452.0 million, an increase of $43.9 million, or 10.8%, from the Prior Period. Both revenues and cost of revenues in the Prior Period were severely impacted by the effects of COVID-19, and the increase in our results in the Combined Period were driven by improvements related to operations in Latin America and improvements in our well control services, partially offset by declines in well completion services. Additionally, during the Combined Period, we incurred shut down costs of $8.7 million at certain locations primarily in our Well Services segment which include costs associated with the severance of personnel and write-down of inventory at these locations.

32


Table of Contents

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion was $228.2 million during the Combined Period compared to $115.8 million during the Prior Period. The increase is related to both an increase in the carrying value of our assets and lower average remaining useful lives as a result of fair value adjustments recorded as a part of fresh start accounting. Depreciation expense in the Combined Period was impacted by the valuation process under fresh start accounting. Certain fully depreciated assets were assigned an estimated fair value of approximately $197.5 million and a remaining useful life of less than 36 months which significantly increased the amount of depreciation expense recorded in the Combined Period. Depreciation expense for these previously fully depreciated assets was $167.5 million for the Combined Period.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expense was $128.6 million during the Combined Period compared to $205.8 million during the Prior Period. The decrease is the result of our continued focus on limiting spending and reducing our cost structure.

Restructuring Expenses

Restructuring expenses during the Combined Period were $24.2 million and primarily relate to severance expenses and costs for executive officers that resigned during the period as well as professional fees associated with our Transformation Project.

Restructuring expenses for the Prior Period were $47.1 million, and include $31.5 million of advisory and professional fees relating to the Chapter 11 Cases and $15.6 million related to the a premium paid to certain consenting noteholders in connection with the bankruptcy.

Other (gains) and losses, net

Other losses, net during the Combined Period were $16.7 million and were comprised $13.1 million related to our Well Services segment, which includes approximately $11.7 million from exit activities related to SES Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd, and $3.6 million related to our Rentals segment. Other (gains) and losses, net primarily relate to charges recorded as part of our strategic disposal of low margin assets in line with our Transformation Project and includes gains and losses on the disposal of assets, as well as impairments related to long-lived assets.

Reorganization items, net

Reorganization items, net were $335.6 million during the Combined Period.

Interest Income (Expense), net

Interest income was $2.5 million for the Combined Period ascompared to interest expense of $92.4 million for the Prior Period. Interest expense for the Prior Period was a result of outstanding debt which was subsequently eliminated as a liability subject to compromise and settled in accordance with the Plan.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the Successor Period and the Predecessor Period was 21.4%, and 18.2%, respectively.

The tax rate in the Successor Period is different from the blended federal and state statutory rate of 22.5% primarily from non-deductible items and foreign losses for which no tax benefit was recorded.

The tax rate in the Predecessor Period is different from the blended federal and state statutory rate of 22.5% primarily from the adoption of fresh start accounting during the period. The cancellation of indebtedness income resulting from the restructuring has significantly reduced our US tax attributes, including but not limited to net operating loss carryforwards. We experienced an ownership change under Sec. 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which is anticipated to limit certain remaining tax attributes.

The effective tax rate for the Prior Period was 10.6%. The tax rate is different from the blended federal and state statutory rate of 22.5% primarily from foreign losses for which no tax benefit was recorded.

33


Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $40.4 million for the Combined Period as compared to $168.7 million for the Prior Period. See Note 17 - Discontinued Operations to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies for exploration, development and production activities. Certain sources and uses of cash, such as our level of discretionary capital expenditures and divestitures of non-core assets, are within our control and are adjusted as necessary based on market conditions.

Our primary sources of liquidity have been cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations and from asset sales, and availability under our Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $339.1 million. During the Current Period, net cash provided by operating activities was $175.4 million, and we received $85.1 million in cash proceeds from the sale of assets and Select common stock. The primary uses of liquidity are to provide support for operating activities, restructuring activities and capital expenditures. We spent $65.8 million of cash on capital expenditures during the Current Period.

The energy industry faces growing negative sentiment in the market which may affect our ability to access capital on terms favorable to us. While we have confidence in the level of support from our lenders, this negative sentiment in the energy industry has not only impacted our customers in North America, but also affected the availability and pricing for most credit lines extended to participants in the energy industry. From time to time, we may enter into transactions to dispose of businesses or capital assets that no longer fit our long-term strategy.

Distributions to Shareholders

On November 16, 2022, we announced that our Board declared a special cash dividend of $12.45 per share on our outstanding Class A common stock. The Board determined that, in addition to the special cash dividend, which totaled $250.0 million, to shareholders of our Class A common stock, we would make dividend equivalent payments to each holder of unvested restricted stock units. The special dividend was paid on December 28, 2022.

Debt Instruments

On the Emergence Date, pursuant to the Plan, we entered into a Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders and letter of credit issuers named therein providing for a $120.0 million asset-based secured revolving Credit Facility, all of which is available for the issuance of letters of credit. The issuance of letters of credit will reduce availability under the Credit Facility dollar-for-dollar. The Credit Facility will mature on December 9, 2024.

As of December 31, 2022, the borrowing base under the Credit Facility was approximately $120.0 million and we had $34.9 million of letters of credit outstanding that reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accounting policies described below are considered critical in obtaining an understanding of our consolidated financial statements because their application requires significant estimates and judgments by management in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Management’s estimates and judgments are inherently uncertain and may differ significantly from actual results achieved. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if the following conditions apply:

the estimate requires significant assumptions; and
changes in estimate could have or, a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition; or
if different estimates that could have been selected had been used, there could be a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

It is management’s view that the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, actual results can differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The sections below contain information about our most critical accounting estimates.

34


Table of Contents

Long-Lived Assets Valuation We review long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used in operations when the fair value of those assets is less than their respective carrying amount. Impairment losses are recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of such assets exceeds the fair value. Fair value is measured, in part, by the estimated cash flows to be generated by those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon, among other things, historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market rates, utilization levels and operating performance. Our estimates of cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions or changes in an asset’s operating performance. Assets are generally grouped by subsidiary or division for the impairment testing, which represent the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Our estimate of fair value represents our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market transactions and is subject to variability. The oil and gas industry is cyclical and our estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows, can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and, in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment charges.

Decommissioning liabilityOur decommissioning liability is associated with our oil and gas property and include costs related to the plugging of wells, removal of the related platform and equipment and site restoration. We review the adequacy of our decommissioning liability whenever indicators suggest that the estimated cash flows and/or relating timing needed to satisfy the liability have changed materially. Estimates of our decommissioning liability are calculated using the income approach. Estimates of future retirement costs are adjusted for an estimated inflation rate over the expected time period prior to retirement and future cash outflows are discounted by a credit adjusted risk-free rate.

Income Taxes We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method considers the differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Our deferred tax calculation requires us to make certain estimates about our future operations. Changes in state, federal and foreign tax laws, as well as changes in our financial condition or the carrying value of existing assets and liabilities, could affect these estimates. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that the rate is enacted.

Fair Value MeasurementsFair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs used in determining fair value are characterized according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputs based on the degree to which they are observable. We historically utilized unadjusted quoted prices in the market for measuring the fair value of debt. We utilize unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets for measuring the fair value of non-qualified deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities. We utilized unadjusted quoted prices which are readily determinable for measuring the fair value of our investment in equity securities. We use both cost and market estimates when calculating fair value for long-lived assets for impairment.

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance

See Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – New Accounting Pronouncements.”

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates. A discussion of our market risk exposure in financial instruments follows.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Prior to the Emergence Date, the functional currency of the majority of our international subsidiaries was US dollars and the functional currency for certain of our international subsidiaries was the local currency.

Commencing on the Emergence Date, as part of adopting a new accounting policy at fresh start accounting, the functional currency of certain international subsidiaries changed from the local currency to US dollars. This change brings alignment so that our functional currency is US dollars. Management considered the economic factors outlined in FASB ASC Topic No. 830 - Foreign Currency Matters in the determination of the functional currency. Management concluded that the predominance of factors support the use of the US Dollar as the functional currency which resulted in a change in functional currency to US dollars for all international subsidiaries.

35


Table of Contents

The change in functional currency is applied on a prospective basis beginning on the Emergence Date and translation adjustments will continue to remain as a component of prior periods accumulated other comprehensive loss.

We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes or use derivatives with complex features. When we believe prudent, we enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. We do not enter into forward foreign exchange contracts for trading purposes. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had no variable rate debt outstanding.

Commodity Price Risk

Our revenues, profitability and future rate of growth significantly depend upon the market prices of oil and natural gas. Lower prices may also reduce the amount of oil and gas that can economically be produced.

36


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238)

38

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 185)

41

Consolidated Balance Sheets

42

Consolidated Statements of Operations

43

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

44

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

45

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

47

37


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Successor) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income (loss), of changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the period from February 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the period from February 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Accounting

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Superior Energy Services, Inc. and certain of its direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively the “Affiliate Debtors”) filed petitions on December 7, 2020 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (Bankruptcy Court) for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Affiliate Debtor’s Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization on January 19, 2021 and the Affiliate Debtor’s emerged from bankruptcy on February 2, 2021. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, the Company adopted fresh start accounting as of February 2, 2021.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidatedfinancial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Decommissioning Liabilities Assessment

As described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a decommissioning liability associated with oil and gas property related to the plugging of wells, decommissioning of the platform and related equipment and site restoration. Management

38


Table of Contents

reviews the adequacy of the decommissioning liability whenever indicators suggest that the estimated cash flows and/or timing needed to satisfy the liability have changed materially. During the second quarter of 2022, the Company undertook an initiative to alter their decommissioning program, whereby they intend to convert the platform into an artificial reef (“reef-in-place”). The reef-in-place program would involve severing the top portion of the structure at a permitted navigation depth and placing the severed structure on the sea floor next to the base of the remaining structure. Converting to a reef-in-place program reduced the estimated costs associated with decommissioning the wells and platform, and also impacted the time required to complete the decommissioning activities. In December 2022, management revised their estimates relating to the timing and the cost of decommissioning the wells. Management now estimates all decommissioning activities, including the decommissioning of the platform, to be completed by the second quarter of 2030. As disclosed by management, the decommissioning liabilities are calculated using the income approach. Estimates of future retirement costs are adjusted for an estimated inflation rate over the expected time period prior to retirement and future cash outflows are discounted by a credit adjusted risk-free rate. As of December 31, 2022, the decommissioning liabilities were approximately $161 million.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the decommissioning liabilities assessment is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the decommissioning liability estimate, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumption related to future retirement costs, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These proceduresincluded, among others, (i) testing management’s process for developing the decommissioning liability estimate, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the cash flow model, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data used by management in the model, and (iv) the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of management’s significant assumption related to future retirement costs.

Income Tax Benefit Related to a Worthless Stock Deduction

As described in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. For the year ended December 31, 2022, managementrecognized a worthless stock deduction in the U.S. related to deductible outside basis differences in certain domestic subsidiaries, which is the primary driver of the increase in federal deferred tax. The Company executed a transaction through which a worthless stock deduction of approximately $495 million was deducted for income tax purposes resulting in an estimated net tax benefit of $104 million. Management evaluated the deduction and believes it will more likely than not be sustained on its technical merits and have recognized its benefits accordingly.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the worthless stock deduction is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when determining the technical merits of the worthless stock deduction that was deducted for income tax purposes, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s determination of the worthless stock deduction, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, (i) evaluating the appropriateness of management’s assessment of the technical merits of the worthless stock deductionand the application of relevant tax laws in the United States and, (ii) the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in the evaluation of management’s assessment of the technical merits of the worthless stock deduction and the application of relevant tax laws in the United States, the completeness and accuracy of data used in the assessment, and the evaluation of opinions of third-party tax and legal advisors.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

March 15, 2023

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

39


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income (loss), of changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and of cash flows of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Predecessor) (the “Company”) for the period from January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the period from January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Accounting

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Superior Energy Services, Inc. and certain of its direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively the “Affiliate Debtors”) filed petitions on December 7, 2020 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (Bankruptcy Court) for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Affiliate Debtor’s Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization on January 19, 2021 and the Affiliate Debtors emerged from bankruptcy on February 2, 2021. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, the Company adopted fresh start accounting as of February 2, 2021.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

March 21, 2022

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

40


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2020 (Predecessor), and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations of the Company and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 (Predecessor), in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, TX

March 26, 2021, except as to Note 17, as to which the date is March 21, 2022

We served as the Company’s auditor from 1996 to 2021.

41


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

FORM
10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART III
1
5
28
29
30
PART IV
31
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

258,999

 

 

$

314,974

 

 Accounts receivable, net

 

 

249,808

 

 

 

182,432

 

 Income taxes receivable

 

 

6,665

 

 

 

5,099

 

 Prepaid expenses

 

 

17,299

 

 

 

15,861

 

 Inventory

 

 

65,587

 

 

 

60,603

 

 Investment in equity securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

25,735

 

 Other current assets

 

 

6,276

 

 

 

6,701

 

 Assets held for sale

 

 

11,978

 

 

 

37,528

 

 Total current assets

 

 

616,612

 

 

 

648,933

 

 Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

282,376

 

 

 

356,274

 

 Note receivable

 

 

69,679

 

 

 

60,588

 

 Restricted cash

 

 

80,108

 

 

 

79,561

 

 Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

18,797

 

 

 

25,154

 

 Noncurrent deferred tax assets

 

 

97,492

 

 

 

1,894

 

 Other long-term assets, net

 

 

25,948

 

 

 

27,104

 

 Total assets

 

$

1,191,012

 

 

$

1,199,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

$

31,570

 

 

$

43,080

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

116,575

 

 

 

108,610

 

 Income taxes payable

 

 

11,682

 

 

 

8,272

 

 Current portion of decommissioning liability

 

 

9,770

 

 

 

-

 

 Liabilities held for sale

 

 

3,349

 

 

 

5,607

 

 Total current liabilities

 

 

172,946

 

 

 

165,569

 

 Decommissioning liability

 

 

150,901

 

 

 

190,380

 

 Deferred income taxes

 

 

3,388

 

 

 

12,441

 

 Operating lease liability

 

 

14,634

 

 

 

19,193

 

 Other long-term liabilities

 

 

66,259

 

 

 

70,192

 

 Total liabilities

 

 

408,128

 

 

 

457,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Class A common stock $0.01 par value; 50,000 shares authorized;
    
19,999 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and
    December 31, 2021

 

 

200

 

 

 

200

 

 Class B common stock $0.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized;
    
84 shares issued and 80 shares outstanding at December 31,
    2022 and
76 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 Class A Additional paid-in capital

 

 

902,486

 

 

 

902,486

 

 Class B Additional paid-in capital

 

 

5,896

 

 

 

1,224

 

 Accumulated deficit

 

 

(125,699

)

 

 

(162,178

)

 Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

782,884

 

 

 

741,733

 

 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,191,012

 

 

$

1,199,508

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

42


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Services

 

$

386,775

 

 

$

305,699

 

 

 

$

19,234

 

 

$

299,383

 

 Rentals

 

 

309,314

 

 

 

208,951

 

 

 

 

14,434

 

 

 

225,363

 

 Product sales

 

 

187,871

 

 

 

134,104

 

 

 

 

12,260

 

 

 

142,503

 

 Total revenues

 

 

883,960

 

 

 

648,754

 

 

 

 

45,928

 

 

 

667,249

 

 Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Services

 

 

268,078

 

 

 

236,784

 

 

 

 

15,080

 

 

 

230,341

 

 Rentals

 

 

102,975

 

 

 

86,354

 

 

 

 

5,876

 

 

 

88,535

 

 Product sales

 

 

105,898

 

 

 

99,114

 

 

 

 

8,817

 

 

 

89,255

 

 Total cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

476,951

 

 

 

422,252

 

 

 

 

29,773

 

 

 

408,131

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Services

 

 

37,168

 

 

 

105,426

 

 

 

 

3,500

 

 

 

51,754

 

 Rentals

 

 

29,724

 

 

 

69,443

 

 

 

 

2,627

 

 

 

38,561

 

 Product sales

 

 

31,168

 

 

 

44,990

 

 

 

 

2,231

 

 

 

25,456

 

 Total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

98,060

 

 

 

219,859

 

 

 

 

8,358

 

 

 

115,771

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

128,294

 

 

 

117,575

 

 

 

 

11,052

 

 

 

205,773

 

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

6,375

 

 

 

22,952

 

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

47,055

 

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(29,134

)

 

 

16,726

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Reduction in value of assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

23,775

 

 Income (loss) from operations

 

 

203,414

 

 

 

(150,610

)

 

 

 

(4,525

)

 

 

(133,256

)

 Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest income (expense), net

 

 

11,713

 

 

 

2,331

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

(92,426

)

 Reorganization items, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

335,560

 

 

 

(19,520

)

 Other income (expense)

 

 

(1,804

)

 

 

(7,128

)

 

 

 

(2,105

)

 

 

(9,229

)

 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

213,323

 

 

 

(155,407

)

 

 

 

329,132

 

 

 

(254,431

)

 Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

77,719

 

 

 

33,298

 

 

 

 

(60,003

)

 

 

26,888

 

 Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

291,042

 

 

 

(122,109

)

 

 

 

269,129

 

 

 

(227,543

)

 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

 

(4,577

)

 

 

(40,069

)

 

 

 

(352

)

 

 

(168,687

)

 Net income (loss)

 

$

286,465

 

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

268,777

 

 

$

(396,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Income (loss) per share - basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

14.53

 

 

$

(6.11

)

 

 

$

18.13

 

 

$

(15.35

)

 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

 

(0.22

)

 

 

(2.00

)

 

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(11.38

)

 Net income (loss)

 

$

14.31

 

 

$

(8.11

)

 

 

$

18.11

 

 

$

(26.73

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Income (loss) per share - diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

14.49

 

 

$

(6.11

)

 

 

$

18.06

 

 

$

(15.35

)

 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

 

(0.23

)

 

 

(2.00

)

 

 

 

(0.03

)

 

 

(11.38

)

 Net income (loss)

 

$

14.26

 

 

$

(8.11

)

 

 

$

18.03

 

 

$

(26.73

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic

 

 

20,024

 

 

 

19,998

 

 

 

 

14,845

 

 

 

14,822

 

 Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

20,087

 

 

 

19,998

 

 

 

 

14,905

 

 

 

14,822

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

43


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 Net income (loss)

 

$

286,465

 

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

268,777

 

 

$

(396,230

)

 Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

67,947

 

 

 

3,980

 

 Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

286,465

 

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

336,724

 

 

$

(392,250

)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

44


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2022

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

paid-in

 

 

 

 

 

other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

 

Class B

 

 

capital

 

 

Treasury

 

 

comprehensive

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Class A

 

 

Class B

 

 

stock

 

 

loss, net

 

 

deficit

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balances, December 31, 2019 (Predecessor)

 

 

15,689

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,752,859

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(4,290

)

 

$

(71,927

)

 

$

(2,627,085

)

 

$

49,573

 

 Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(396,230

)

 

 

(396,230

)

 Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,980

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,980

 

 Transactions under stock plans

 

 

110

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(208

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(208

)

 Stock-based compensation expense, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,238

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,238

 

 Balances, December 31, 2020 (Predecessor)

 

 

15,799

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,756,889

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,290

)

 

 

(67,947

)

 

 

(3,023,315

)

 

$

(338,647

)

 Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

268,777

 

 

 

268,777

 

 Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

67,947

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

67,947

 

 Extinguishment of unrecognized compensation expense

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

988

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

988

 

 Stock-based compensation expense, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

935

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

935

 

 Restricted stock units vested

 

 

49

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Shares withheld and retired

 

 

(15

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Cancellation of Predecessor equity

 

 

(15,833

)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,758,812

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,290

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,754,538

 

 

 

-

 

 Issuance of Successor Class A common stock

 

 

19,996

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

902,486

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

902,686

 

 Balances, February 2, 2021 (Predecessor)

 

 

19,996

 

 

$

200

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

902,486

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

902,686

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balances, February 3, 2021 (Successor)

 

 

19,996

 

 

$

200

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

902,486

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

902,686

 

 Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(162,178

)

 

 

(162,178

)

 Stock-based compensation expense, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,710

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,710

 

 Common stock issued

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Share withheld and retired

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,485

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,485

)

 Balances, December 31, 2021 (Successor)

 

 

19,999

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

902,486

 

 

 

1,224

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(162,178

)

 

 

741,733

 

 Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

286,465

 

 

 

286,465

 

 Cash dividends ($12.45 per share)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(249,986

)

 

 

(249,986

)

 Stock-based compensation expense, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,807

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,807

 

 Restricted stock units vested

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Share withheld and retired

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(135

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(135

)

 Shares placed in treasury

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Balances, December 31, 2022 (Successor)

 

 

19,999

 

 

$

200

 

 

 

80

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

902,486

 

 

$

5,896

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(125,699

)

 

$

782,884

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

45


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net income (loss)

 

$

286,465

 

 

$

(162,178

)

 

 

$

268,777

 

 

$

(396,230

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

98,060

 

 

 

251,361

 

 

 

 

10,499

 

 

 

146,793

 

 Right-of-use assets amortization

 

 

6,357

 

 

 

8,380

 

 

 

 

1,372

 

 

 

20,224

 

 Deferred income taxes

 

 

(104,587

)

 

 

(48,975

)

 

 

 

54,322

 

 

 

2,041

 

 Stock based compensation expense

 

 

4,807

 

 

 

2,710

 

 

 

 

935

 

 

 

2,628

 

 Reorganization items, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(354,279

)

 

 

18,087

 

 Bad debt

 

 

2,248

 

 

 

(4,908

)

 

 

 

(210

)

 

 

12,473

 

 Gain on sale of assets and businesses

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

-

 

 Gain on sale of equity securities

 

 

(8,950

)

 

 

(383

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Unrealized gain on investment in equity securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,147

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(32,872

)

 

 

30,707

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

141,110

 

 Other reconciling items, net

 

 

(3,822

)

 

 

6,687

 

 

 

 

(355

)

 

 

(8,309

)

 Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts receivable

 

 

(65,669

)

 

 

(28,676

)

 

 

 

3,602

 

 

 

111,948

 

 Prepaid expenses

 

 

(1,096

)

 

 

4,854

 

 

 

 

(340

)

 

 

-

 

 Inventory and other current assets

 

 

(4,568

)

 

 

22,866

 

 

 

 

(221

)

 

 

27,933

 

 Accounts payable

 

 

(10,149

)

 

 

735

 

 

 

 

(2,365

)

 

 

(35,170

)

 Accrued expenses

 

 

8,503

 

 

 

(21,770

)

 

 

 

23,489

 

 

 

(18,154

)

 Income taxes

 

 

771

 

 

 

11,535

 

 

 

 

340

 

 

 

-

 

 Other, net

 

 

(82

)

 

 

(11,914

)

 

 

 

(241

)

 

 

(23,157

)

 Net cash from operating activities

 

 

175,416

 

 

 

58,884

 

 

 

 

5,383

 

 

 

2,217

 

 Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Payments for capital expenditures

 

 

(65,784

)

 

 

(34,152

)

 

 

 

(3,035

)

 

 

(47,653

)

 Proceeds from sales of assets

 

 

50,376

 

 

 

97,505

 

 

 

 

775

 

 

 

50,039

 

 Proceeds from sales of equity securities

 

 

34,685

 

 

 

4,099

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Net cash from investing activities

 

 

19,277

 

 

 

67,452

 

 

 

 

(2,260

)

 

 

2,386

 

 Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Credit facility costs

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

 

(1,920

)

 

 

(1,554

)

 Tax withholdings for vested restricted stock units

 

 

(135

)

 

 

(1,485

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(208

)

 Distributions to shareholders

 

 

(249,986

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Other

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(12,432

)

 Net cash from financing activities

 

 

(250,121

)

 

 

(1,499

)

 

 

 

(1,920

)

 

 

(14,194

)

 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

311

 

 

 

2,387

 

 Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

(55,428

)

 

 

124,837

 

 

 

 

1,514

 

 

 

(7,204

)

 Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

 

 

394,535

 

 

 

269,698

 

 

 

 

268,184

 

 

 

275,388

 

 Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 

$

339,107

 

 

$

394,535

 

 

 

$

269,698

 

 

$

268,184

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

46


Table of Contents

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to (i) prior to February 2, 2021 (the “Emergence Date”), SESI Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Superior Energy Services, Inc.) and its subsidiaries (“Predecessor”) and (ii) after the Emergence Date, Superior Energy Services, Inc. (formerly known as Superior Newco, Inc.) and its subsidiaries (“Successor”).

As used herein, the following terms refer to our operations:

"Predecessor Period"

January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021

"Successor Period"

February 3, 2021 through December 31, 2021

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Certain previously reported amounts, specifically related to assets held for sale and discontinued operations, have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Due to the lack of comparability with historical financials, our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes are presented with a “black line” division to emphasize the lack of comparability between amounts presented as of, and after, February 2, 2021 and amounts presented for all prior periods. Our financial results for future periods following the application of fresh start accounting will be different from historical trends and the differences may be material.

Business

We serve major, national and independent oil and natural gas exploration and production companies around the world and offer products and services with respect to the various phases of a well’s economic life cycle.

Historically, we provided a wide variety of services and products to many markets within the energy industry. Our core businesses focus on products and services that we believe meet the criteria of:

being critical to our customers’ oil and gas operations;
limiting competition from the three largest global oilfield service companies;
requiring deep technical expertise through the design or use of our products or services, such as premium drill pipe and drilling bottom hole assembly accessory rentals;
PART III
unlikely to become a commoditized product or service to our customers; and
providing strong cash flow generation capacity and opportunities.

The result of this approach is a portfolio of business lines grounded in our core mission of providing high quality products and services while maintaining the trust and serving the needs of our customers, with an emphasis on free cash flow generation and capital efficiency.

Emergence from Voluntary Reorganization under Chapter 11

On December 7, 2020, certain of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Affiliate Debtors”) filed petitions for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and, in connection therewith, filed the proposed Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Plan”). On the Emergence Date, the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan were satisfied and we emerged from Chapter 11.

On the Emergence Date, we qualified for and adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No. 852 – Reorganizations, which specifies the accounting and financial reporting requirements for entities reorganizing through Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The application of fresh start accounting resulted in a new basis of accounting and we became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the implementation of the Plan and the application of fresh start accounting, our historical financial statements on or before the Emergence Date are not a reliable indicator of our results of operations for any period after our adoption of fresh start accounting.

47


Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, we make various estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities reported as of the dates of the balance sheets and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for the periods shown in the income statements and statements of cash flows. All estimates, assumptions, valuations and financial projections related to fresh start accounting, including the fair value adjustments, the enterprise value and equity value projections, are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and the resolution of contingencies beyond our control.

Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

The majority of our business is conducted with major and independent oil and gas companies. We evaluate the financial strength of our customers and provide allowances for probable credit losses when deemed necessary.

The market for our services and products is the oil and gas industry in the U.S. land and Gulf of Mexico areas and select international market areas. Oil and gas companies make capital expenditures on exploration, development and production operations. The level of these expenditures historically has been characterized by significant volatility.

We derive a large amount of revenue from a small number of major and independent oil and gas companies. There were no customers that exceeded 10% of our total revenues in 2022, 2021 or 2020.

Our assets that are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and trade receivables. The financial institutions with which we transact business are large, investment grade financial institutions which are “well capitalized” under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, thereby minimizing our exposure to credit risks for deposits in excess of federally insured amounts.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term investments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount or the earned amount but not yet invoiced and do not bear interest. We maintain our allowance for doubtful accounts at net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our best estimate of probable uncollectible amounts in existing accounts receivable. We assess individual customers and overall receivables balances to identify amounts that are believed to be uncertain of collection. The aging of the receivable balance as well as economic factors concerning the customer factor into the judgment and estimation of allowances, which often involve significant dollar amounts. Adjustments to the allowance in future periods may be made based on changing customer conditions. Our allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $6.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

As part of the adoption of fresh start accounting and effective upon emergence from bankruptcy, we have adopted new presentations for certain items within our consolidated balance sheets and statement of operations. Prior to emergence from bankruptcy, we recognized bad debt expense within general and administrative expenses. These expenses are now recognized within cost of revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2022 (the "Current Period"), we recognized $2.2 million in bad debt expense. During the Successor Period and Predecessor Period, we recognized $4.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in bad debt recoveries. Additionally, in the year ended December 31, 2020 (the "Prior Period"), we recognized bad debt expense of $11.9 million.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when performance obligations are satisfied in accordance with contractual terms, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for services rendered, rentals provided or products sold. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities and revenues are reported on a net basis.

48


Table of Contents

A performance obligation arises under contracts with customers and is the unit of account under Topic 606. We account for services rendered and rentals provided separately if they are distinct and the service or rental is separately identifiable from other items provided to a customer and if a customer can benefit from the services rendered or rentals provided on their own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. A contract’s standalone selling prices are determined based on the prices charged for services rendered, rentals provided or products sold. Our payment terms vary by the type of products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when the payment is due is typically 30 days.

Services revenue: primarily represents amounts charged to customers for the completion of services rendered, including labor, products and supplies necessary to perform the service. Rates for these services vary depending on the type of services provided and are primarily based on a per hour or per day basis.

Rentals revenue: primarily priced on a per day, per man hour or similar basis and consists of fees charged to customers for use of rental equipment over the term of the rental period, which is generally less than twelve months.

Product sales: products are generally sold based upon purchase orders or contracts with our customers that include fixed or determinable prices but do not include right of return provisions or other significant post-delivery obligations. We recognize revenue from product sales when title passes to the customer, the customer assumes risks and rewards of ownership, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery occurs as directed by the customer.

We expense sales commissions when incurred as the amortization period would have been one year or less.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, except for assets for which reduction in value is recorded during the period and assets acquired using purchase accounting, which are recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Machinery and equipment

3-12 years

Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements

10-30 years

Automobiles, trucks, tractors and trailers

4-7 years

Furniture and fixtures

3-10 years

Reduction in Value of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used in operations when the fair value of those assets is less than their respective carrying amount. Impairment losses are recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of such assets exceeds the fair value. Fair value is measured, in part, by the estimated cash flows to be generated by those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon, among other things, historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market rates, utilization levels and operating performance. Our estimates of cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions or changes in an asset’s operating performance. Assets are generally grouped by subsidiary or division for the impairment testing, which represent the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Our estimate of fair value represents our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market transactions and is subject to variability. The oil and gas industry is cyclical and our estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows, can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and, in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment charges.

Prior to emergence from bankruptcy, we recognized the reduction in value assets separately on the consolidated statement of operations. Reduction in value of assets are now recognized within other (gains) and losses, net as a component of operating income.

Other (gains) and losses, net

Other (gains) and losses, net primarily relate to charges recorded as part of our strategic disposal of low margin assets in line with our efforts to reconfigure our organization both operationally and financially (the “Transformation Project”) and includes gains and losses on the disposal of assets, as well as impairments related to long-lived assets.

49


Table of Contents

Other gains, net for the Current Period were $29.1 million, and are primarily comprised of gains of $23.6 million related to our Well Services segment, including a gain of $17.4 million from revisions in estimates related to our decommissioning liability, and $5.2 million related to net gains on the disposal of assets in our Rentals segment.

Other losses, net in the Successor Period were $16.7 million, and are comprised of $13.1 million related to our Well Services segment, including approximately $11.7 million from exit activities related to SES Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd, and $3.6 million related to our Rentals segment.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash as of December 31, 2022 includes approximately $77.3 million held in a collateral account for the payment and performance of secured obligations including the reimbursement of letters of credit. Additionally, we hold approximately $2.8 million in escrow to secure the future decommissioning obligations related to the oil and gas property.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method considers the differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Our deferred tax calculation requires us to make certain estimates about our future operations. Changes in state, federal and foreign tax laws, as well as changes in our financial condition or the carrying value of existing assets and liabilities, could affect these estimates. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that the rate is enacted.

We recognize deferred tax assets ("DTAs") to the extent that we believe that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, carryback potential if permitted under the tax law, and results of recent operations. If we determine that we would be able to realize our DTAs in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the DTA valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

We record uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

Foreign Currency

The functional currency of our international subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Financial statements of our international subsidiaries are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the historical exchange rate for affected the long-term assets and liabilities and the balance sheet date exchange rate for affected current assets and liabilities. An average exchange rate is used for each period for revenues and expenses. These transaction gains and losses, as well as any other transactions in a currency other than the functional currency, are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the currency exchange rates change. During the Current Period, the Successor Period, the Predecessor Period and the Prior Period, we recorded foreign currency losses of $12.6 million, $8.8 million, $2.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We record compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions and include such costs in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award).

Self-Insurance Reserves

50


Table of Contents

We are self-insured, through deductibles and retentions, up to certain levels for losses under our insurance programs. We accrue for these liabilities based on estimates of the ultimate cost of claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. We regularly review the estimates of asserted and unasserted claims and provide for losses through reserves. We obtain actuarial reviews to evaluate the reasonableness of internal estimates for losses related to workers’ compensation, auto liability and group medical on an annual basis.

Restructuring expenses

Restructuring expenses in our consolidated statement of operations during the Current Period, Successor Period and Predecessor Period were $6.4 million, $23.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Restructuring expenses in the Current Period represent costs associated with our Transformation Project, as well as legal and other professional expenses primarily related to certain tax and shareholder distribution matters. Restructuring expenses in the Successor Period and Predecessor Period primarily relate to professional fees and separation costs related to former executives and personnel. Additionally, during the Successor Period, we incurred shut down costs of $8.9 million at certain locations in our Well Services segment. These shut down costs include the write-down of inventory of $6.5 million which is reflected in cost of sales and the severance of personnel and other shut down costs of $2.4 million which is primarily reflected in cost of services.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). This update improves financial reporting by requiring earlier recognition of credit losses on financing receivables and other financial assets in scope by using the Current Expected Credit Losses (the “CECL”) model. The CECL model utilizes a lifetime expected credit loss measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses on financial instruments at the time the asset is originated or acquired. This update will apply to receivables arising from revenue transactions. The new standard is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2023. We have concluded that the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform — Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (Topic 848). This update provides an optional expedient and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. In response to the concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates (“IBORs”) and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), regulators in several jurisdictions around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction-based and less susceptible to manipulation. The ASU provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates that are expected to be discontinued. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, which clarifies that certain provisions in Topic 848, if elected by an entity, apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. As our credit agreement allows for alternative benchmark rates to be applied to any borrowings, we do not expect the cessation of LIBOR to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

(2) Fresh Start Accounting

In connection with the emergence from bankruptcy and in accordance with ASC 852, we qualified for and adopted fresh start accounting on the Emergence Date because (1) the holders of our then existing common shares received less than 50 percent of our new common shares outstanding upon emergence and (2) the reorganization value of our assets immediately prior to confirmation of the Plan of $1,456.8 million was less than the total of all post-petition liabilities and allowed claims of $2,076.1 million.

Reorganization Value

In accordance with ASC 852, upon adoption of fresh start accounting, the reorganization value derived from the enterprise value as disclosed in the Plan was allocated to our assets and liabilities based on their fair values (except for deferred income taxes) in accordance with FASB ASC Topic No. 805 - Business Combinations (ASC 805) and FASB ASC Topic No. 820 - Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820). The amount of deferred income taxes recorded due to the fair value adjustments to assets and liabilities was determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic No. 740 - Income Taxes.

The reorganization value represents the fair value of our total assets before considering certain liabilities and is intended to approximate the amount a willing buyer would pay for our assets immediately after restructuring. The Plan confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court estimated a range of enterprise values between $710.0 million and $880.0 million.

51


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the enterprise value to the reorganization value of our assets that has been allocated to our individual assets as of the Emergence Date (in thousands):

 

 

Emergence Date

 

Selected Enterprise Value within Bankruptcy Court Range

 

$

729,918

 

Plus: Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

172,768

 

Plus: Liabilities excluding the decommissioning liabilities

 

 

380,496

 

Plus: Decommissioning liabilities, including decommissioning liabilities classified as held for sale

 

 

173,622

 

Reorganization Value

 

$

1,456,804

 

Management determined the enterprise and corresponding equity value using various valuation methods, including (i) discounted cash flow analysis (“DCF”), (ii) comparable company analysis and (iii) precedent transaction analysis. The use of each approach provides corroboration for the other approaches.

In order to estimate the enterprise value using the DCF analysis approach, management’s estimated future cash flow projections, plus a terminal value which was calculated by applying a multiple based on our internal rate of return (“IRR”) of 17.6% and a perpetuity growth rate of 3.0% to the terminal year’s projected earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). These estimated future cash flows were then discounted to an assumed present value using our estimated weighted-average cost of capital, which is represented by our IRR.

The comparable company analysis provides an estimate of our value relative to other publicly traded companies with similar operating and financial characteristics, by which a range of EBITDA multiples of the comparable companies was then applied to management’s projected EBITDA to derive an estimated enterprise value.

Precedent transaction analysis provides an estimate of enterprise value based on recent sale transactions of similar companies, by deriving the implied EBITDA multiple of those transactions, based on sales prices, which was then applied to management’s projected EBITDA.

The enterprise value and corresponding equity value are dependent upon achieving the future financial results set forth in our valuations, as well as the realization of certain other assumptions. All estimates, assumptions, valuations and financial projections, including the fair value adjustments, the enterprise value and equity value projections, are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and the resolution of contingencies beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the estimates, assumptions, valuations or financial projections will be realized, and actual results could vary materially.

Valuation Process

The reorganization value was allocated to the Successor’s reporting segments using the discounted cash flow approach. The reorganization value was then allocated to the Successor’s identifiable assets and liabilities using the fair value principle as contemplated in ASC 820. The specific approach, or approaches, used to allocate reorganization value by asset class are noted below.

Inventory

The fair value of the inventory was determined by using both a cost approach and income approach. Inventory was segregated into raw materials, spare parts, work in process (“WIP”), and finished goods. Fair value of raw materials and spare parts inventory were determined using the cost approach. Fair value of finished goods and WIP inventory were determined by using the net realizable value approach. The fair value of finished goods was measured using an estimate of the costs to sell or dispose of the inventory plus a reasonable profit allowance on those efforts adjusted for holding costs. The fair value of WIP was measured using an estimate of the costs to complete and sell or consume the inventory plus a reasonable profit allowance on those efforts adjusted for holding costs.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Real Property

The fair values of real property locations were estimated using the sales comparison (market) approach and cost approach. As part of the valuation process, information was obtained on the Successor’s current usage, building type, year built, and cost history for all properties valued. In determining the fair value and remaining useful life for real property assets, functional and economic obsolescence was considered and taken as an adjustment at the asset level.

Tangible Assets Excluding Real Property and Oil and Gas Assets

52


Table of Contents

The fair values of our tangible assets were calculated using either the cost or market approach. For most tangible asset categories, a cost approach was utilized relying on purchase year, historic costs, and industry/equipment based trend factors to determine replacement cost new of the assets. Readily available market transaction data was used and adjusted for current market conditions for asset categories with active secondary markets such as heavy trucks and computer equipment. In both approaches, consideration was made for the effects of physical deterioration as well as functional and economic obsolescence in determining both estimates of fair value and the remaining useful lives of the assets.

Oil and Gas Assets

The oil and gas assets were valued using estimates of the reserve volumes and associated income data based on escalated price and cost parameters.

Internally-Developed Software

Internally-developed software was valued using the cost approach in which a replacement cost was estimated based on the software developer time, materials, and other supporting services required to replicate the software.

Decommissioning Liabilities

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic No. 410 – Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (“ASC 410”), the decommissioning liabilities associated with our oil and gas assets were valued using the income approach. Estimates of future retirement costs were adjusted for an estimated inflation rate over the expected time period prior to retirement and future cash outflows were discounted by a credit adjusted risk-free rate. We changed our presentation to consolidate the decommissioning liabilities previously recorded to other long-term liabilities into decommissioning liabilities.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets were identified apart from goodwill using the guidance provided in ASC 805. Intangible assets that were identified as either separable or arose from contract or other legal rights were valued using either the cost or income approaches. The principal intangible assets identified were trademarks and patents. Trademarks and patents were valued using the relief from royalty method in which the subject intangible asset is valued by reference to the amount of royalty income it could generate if it was licensed in an arm’s length transaction to a third party.

Lease Liabilities and Right of Use Assets

The fair value of lease liabilities was measured as the present value of the remaining lease payments, as if the lease were a new lease as of the Emergence Date. The Successor used its incremental borrowing rate of 5.3% commensurate with the Successor's capital structure as the discount rate in determining the present value of the remaining lease payments.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

The adjustments included in the following fresh start consolidated balance sheet as of February 2, 2021 reflect the effects of the transactions contemplated by the Plan and executed by the Successor on the Emergence Date (reflected in the column Reorganization Adjustments), and fair value and other required accounting adjustments resulting from the adoption of fresh start accounting (reflected in the column Fresh Start Adjustments). The explanatory notes provide additional information with regard to the adjustments recorded, the methods used to determine the fair values and significant assumptions.

The consolidated balance sheet as of the Emergence Date was as follows (in thousands):

53


Table of Contents

 

 

As of February 2, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reorganization

 

 

 

 

Fresh Start

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

 

 

Successor

 

 ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

194,671

 

 

$

(21,903

)

 

  (1)

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

$

172,768

 

 Restricted cash - current

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,751

 

 

  (2)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

16,751

 

 Accounts receivable, net

 

 

153,518

 

 

 

11

 

 

  (3)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

153,529

 

 Income taxes receivable

 

 

9,146

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

(170

)

 

  (16)

 

 

8,976

 

 Prepaid expenses

 

 

31,630

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

31,630

 

 Inventory and other current assets

 

 

90,073

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

11,067

 

 

  (17)

 

 

101,140

 

 Assets held for sale

 

 

240,761

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

(20,402

)

 

  (18)

 

 

220,359

 

 Total current assets

 

 

719,799

 

 

 

(5,141

)

 

 

 

 

(9,505

)

 

 

 

 

705,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

401,263

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

139,587

 

 

  (19)

 

 

540,850

 

 Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

32,488

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

1,430

 

 

  (20)

 

 

33,918

 

 Goodwill

 

 

138,934

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

(138,934

)

 

  (21)

 

 

-

 

 Notes receivable

 

 

72,484

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

72,484

 

 Restricted cash - non-current

 

 

80,179

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

80,179

 

 Intangible and other long-term assets, net

 

 

52,264

 

 

 

(10,080

)

 

  (4)

 

 

(17,964

)

 

  (22)

 

 

24,220

 

 Total assets

 

$

1,497,411

 

 

$

(15,221

)

 

 

 

$

(25,386

)

 

 

 

$

1,456,804

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

 Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

$

51,816

 

 

$

(700

)

 

  (5)

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

$

51,116

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

126,768

 

 

 

9,042

 

 

  (6)

 

 

1,406

 

 

  (23)

 

 

137,216

 

 Liabilities held for sale

 

 

39,642

 

 

 

1,614

 

 

  (7)

 

 

(3,992

)

 

  (24)

 

 

37,264

 

 Total current liabilities

 

 

218,226

 

 

 

9,956

 

 

 

 

 

(2,586

)

 

 

 

 

225,596

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Decommissioning liabilities

 

 

134,934

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

34,581

 

 

  (25)

 

 

169,515

 

 Operating lease liabilities

 

 

23,584

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

 

  (26)

 

 

23,555

 

 Deferred income taxes

 

 

4,853

 

 

 

3,100

 

 

  (8)

 

 

51,569

 

 

  (27)

 

 

59,522

 

 Other long-term liabilities

 

 

121,756

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

(45,826

)

 

  (28)

 

 

75,930

 

 Total non-current liabilities

 

 

285,127

 

 

 

3,100

 

 

 

 

 

40,295

 

 

 

 

 

328,522

 

 Liabilities subject to compromise

 

 

1,572,772

 

 

 

(1,572,772

)

 

  (9)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 Total liabilities

 

 

2,076,125

 

 

 

(1,559,716

)

 

 

 

 

37,709

 

 

 

 

 

554,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Predecessor common stock $0.001 par value

 

 

16

 

 

 

(16

)

 

  (10)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 Predecessor Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2,757,824

 

 

 

(2,757,824

)

 

  (11)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 Predecessor Treasury stock at cost

 

 

(4,290

)

 

 

4,290

 

 

  (12)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 Successor Class A common stock $0.001 par value

 

 

-

 

 

 

200

 

 

  (13)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 Successor Additional paid-in capital

 

 

-

 

 

 

902,486

 

 

  (14)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

902,486

 

 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net

 

 

(67,532

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

67,532

 

 

  (29)

 

 

-

 

 Accumulated deficit

 

 

(3,264,732

)

 

 

3,395,359

 

 

  (15)

 

 

(130,627

)

 

  (30)

 

 

-

 

 Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

(578,714

)

 

 

1,544,495

 

 

 

 

 

(63,095

)

 

 

 

 

902,686

 

 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

$

1,497,411

 

 

$

(15,221

)

 

 

 

$

(25,386

)

 

 

 

$

1,456,804

 

54


Table of Contents

Reorganization Adjustments (in thousands)

(1)
Changes in cash and cash equivalents included the following:

Payment of debtor in possession financing fees

$

(183

)

Payment of professional fees at the Emergence Date

(2,649

)

Payment of lease rejection damages classified as liabilities subject to compromise

(400

)

Transfers from cash to restricted cash for Professional Fees Escrow and General
   Unsecured Creditors Escrow

(16,751

)

Payment of debt issuance costs for the Credit Facility

(1,920

)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

(21,903

)

(2)
Changes to restricted cash - current included the following:

Transfer from cash for Professional Fee Escrow

 

$

16,626

 

Transfer from cash for General Unsecured Creditors Escrow

 

 

125

 

Net change in restricted cash - current

 

$

16,751

 

(3)
Changes of $11 to accounts receivable reflect a receivable from the solicitor from the Chapter 11 Cases for excess proceeds received during the Rights Offering.

(4)
Changes to intangibles and other long-term assets included the following:

Write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Delayed-Draw Term Loan

$

(12,000

)

Capitalization of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Facility

1,920

Net change in intangibles and other long-term assets

$

(10,080

)

(5)
Changes to accounts payable included the following:

Payment of professional fees at the Emergence Date

$

(2,649

)

Professional fees recognized and payable at the Emergence Date

1,949

Net change in accounts payable

$

(700

)

(6)
Changes in accrued liabilities include the following:

Payment of debtor in possession financing fees

 

$

(183

)

Accrual of professional fees

 

 

6,500

 

Accrual for transfer taxes

 

 

1,900

 

Reinstatement of lease rejection liabilities to be settled post-emergence

 

 

700

 

Accrual of general unsecured claims against parent

 

 

125

 

Net change in accrued liabilities

 

$

9,042

 

(7)
Changes in liabilities held for sale reflect the fair value reinstatement of rejected lease claims.

(8)
Changes in deferred income taxes are due to reorganization adjustments.

(9)
The resulting gain on liabilities subject to compromise was determined as follows:

55


Table of Contents

 Prepetition 7.125% and 7.750% notes including accrued interest and unpaid interest

 

$

1,335,794

 

 Rejected lease liability claims

 

 

4,956

 

 Allowed Class 6 General Unsecured Claims against Parent

 

 

232,022

 

 Liabilities subject to compromise settled in accordance with the Plan

 

 

1,572,772

 

 Reinstatement of accrued liabilities for lease rejection claims

 

 

(700

)

 Reinstatement of liabilities held for sale for lease rejection claims

 

 

(1,614

)

 Payment to settle lease rejection claims

 

 

(400

)

 Cash proceeds from rights offering

 

 

963

 

 Cash payout provided to cash opt-in noteholders

 

 

(952

)

 Cash Pool to settle GUCs against Parent

 

 

(125

)

 Issuance of common stock to prepetition noteholders, incremental to rights
   offering (par value)

 

 

(193

)

 Additional paid-in capital attributable to successor common stock issuance

 

 

(869,311

)

 Successor common stock issued to cash opt-out noteholders in the rights
   offering (par value)

 

 

(7

)

 Additional paid-in capital attributable to rights offering shares

 

 

(33,175

)

 Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise

 

$

667,258

 

The Equity Rights Offering generated $963 thousand in proceeds used to settle $952 thousand in Cash Opt-in Noteholder claims. The Equity Rights Offering shares were offered at a price of $1.31/share to Cash Opt-out Noteholders. As such, the Equity Rights Offering shares generated the $963 thousand in cash proceeds from the share issuance as well as an implied discount to the Cash Opt-in claimants of $32.2 million, recorded as a loss on share issuance in reorganization items, net. The loss on the Equity Rights Offering share issuance is offset by the gain on share issuance of $32.2 million implied by the issuance of shares to settle Cash Opt-out Noteholder claims at a value of $46.82/share compared to the reorganization value implied share price of $45.14/share.

(10)
Changes of $16 in Predecessor common stock reflect the cancellation of the Predecessor’s common stock.

(11)
Changes in Predecessor additional paid-in capital (APIC) include the following:

Extinguishment of APIC related to Predecessor's outstanding equity interests

$

(2,758,812

)

Extinguishment of RSUs for the Predecessor's incentive plan

988

Net change in Predecessor's additional paid-in capital

$

(2,757,824

)

(12)
Reflects $4.3 million cancellation of Predecessor treasury stock held at cost.

(13)
Changes in the Successor’s Class A common stock include the following:

Issuance of successor Class A common stock to prepetition noteholders,
   incremental to rights offering (par value)

 

$

193

 

Successor Class A common stock issued to cash opt-out noteholders in
   the rights offering (par value)

 

 

7

 

Net change in Successor Class A common stock

 

$

200

 

(14)
Changes in Successor additional paid-in capital include the following:

Additional paid-in capital (Successor Class A common stock)

 

$

869,311

 

Additional paid-in capital (rights offering shares)

 

 

33,175

 

Net change in Successor additional paid-in capital

 

$

902,486

 

(15)
Changes to retained earnings (deficit) include the following:

56


Table of Contents

Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise

 

$

667,258

 

Accrual for transfer tax

 

 

(1,900

)

Extinguishment of RSUs for Predecessor incentive plan

 

 

(988

)

Adjustment to net deferred tax liability taken to tax expense

 

 

(3,100

)

Professional fees earned and payable as a result of consummation of the Plan of Reorganization

 

 

(8,449

)

Write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Delayed-Draw Term Loan

 

 

(12,000

)

Extinguishment of Predecessor equity (par value, APIC, and treasury stock)

 

 

2,754,538

 

Net change in retained earnings (deficit)

 

$

3,395,359

 

Fresh Start Adjustments (in thousands)

(16)
Changes of $170 in income tax receivable reflects the decrease to current deferred tax assets due to the adoption of fresh start accounting.

(17)
Changes in inventory and other current assets included the following:

Fair value adjustment to inventory - Global Segment

 

$

12,137

 

Fair value adjustment to other current assets

 

 

(1,070

)

Net change in inventory and other current assets due to the adoption of fresh
   start accounting

 

$

11,067

 

(18)
Changes of $20.4 million in assets held for sale primarily reflect a fair value adjustment of $16.5 million which decreased the value of real property and a $3.5 million decrease to Predecessor decommissioning balances due to the adoption of fresh start accounting.

(19)
Changes of $139.6 million to property, plant and equipment reflect the fair value adjustment.

 

 

Successor Fair
Value

 

 

 

Predecessor Book
Value

 

Land, Buildings, and Associated Improvements

 

$

117,341

 

 

 

$

205,237

 

Machinery and Equipment

 

 

290,593

 

 

 

 

1,103,501

 

Rental Services Equipment

 

 

92,861

 

 

 

 

617,762

 

Other Depreciable or Depletable Assets

 

 

35,143

 

 

 

 

46,403

 

Construction in Progress

 

 

4,912

 

 

 

 

4,912

 

 

 

 

540,850

 

 

 

 

1,977,815

 

Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Depletion

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(1,576,552

)

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

 

$

540,850

 

 

 

$

401,263

 

(20)
Reflects $1.4 million due to the fair value adjustment increasing operating lease right-of-use assets.

(21)
Changes of $138.9 million to goodwill reflect the derecognition of the Predecessor’s goodwill due to the adoption of fresh start accounting.

(22)
Reduction of other long-term assets was due to the adoption of fresh start accounting and include $17.1 million in decommissioning liabilities related to Predecessor long-term assets fair valued and presented in the Successor’s property, plant, and equipment.

The fair value changes of $1.4 million to intangibles assets are reflected in the table below:

 

 

Successor Fair Value

 

 

 

Predecessor Net Book Value

 

Customer Relationships

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

4,901

 

Trademarks

 

 

4,166

 

 

 

 

11

 

Patents

 

 

2,120

 

 

 

 

-

 

Intangible Assets, Net

 

$

6,286

 

 

 

$

4,912

 

57


Table of Contents

(23)
Changes of $1.4 million to accrued expenses reflect the fair value adjustment increasing the current portion of operating lease liabilities.

(24)
Reflects the $4.0 million fair value adjustment decreasing decommissioning liabilities and operating lease liabilities related to assets held for sale.

(25)
Reflects the $34.6 million fair value adjustment increasing the non-current portion of decommissioning liabilities.

(26)
Reflects the fair value adjustment decreasing the non-current portion of operating lease liabilities.

(27)
Reflects the $70.4 million increase of deferred tax liabilities netted against an $18.8 million increase in realizable deferred tax assets due to the adoption of fresh start accounting.

(28)
Changes of $45.8 million in other long-term liabilities reflects the reclassification of amounts associated with the Predecessor’s decommissioning liability balances that were fair valued and presented in the Successor’s decommissioning liabilities, as well as an increase in FIN48 liabilities of $1.5 million.

(29)
Changes to accumulated other comprehensive loss reflect the elimination of Predecessor currency translation adjustment balances due to the adoption of fresh start accounting on Predecessor currency translation adjustment balances.

(30)
Changes reflect the cumulative impact of fresh start accounting adjustments discussed above and the elimination of the Predecessor’s accumulated other comprehensive loss and the Predecessor’s accumulated deficit.

Fresh start valuation adjustments

$

(77,376

)

Adjustment to net deferred tax liability taken to tax expense

(53,251

)

Net impact to accumulated other comprehensive loss and accumulated deficit

$

(130,627

)

Reorganization Items, net

The Predecessor incurred costs associated with the reorganization, primarily unamortized debt issuance costs, expenses related to rejected leases and post-petition professional fees. In accordance with applicable guidance, costs associated with the Chapter 11 Cases have been recorded as reorganization items, net within the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the Predecessor Period. Reorganization items, net was zero for the Successor Period, with $13.7 million used in operating activities during the Successor Period. Reorganization items, net was $335.6 million for the Predecessor Period, with $3.1 million representing cash used in operating activities during the Predecessor Period, $2.7 million and $0.4 million paid for professional fees and to settle lease rejection damages, respectively.

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise

 

$

667,258

 

Allowed claim adjustment for Class 6 claims

 

 

(232,022

)

Fresh Start valuation adjustments (1)

 

 

(77,376

)

Professional fees

 

 

(16,005

)

Predecessor lease liabilities rejected per the Plan

 

 

13,347

 

Write off of deferred financing costs related to the Delayed-Draw Term Loan

 

 

(12,000

)

Lease rejection damages

 

 

(4,956

)

Extinguishment of RSU's for the Predecessor's incentive plan

 

 

(988

)

Other items

 

 

(1,698

)

Total reorganization items, net

 

$

335,560

 

(1) Includes approximately $16.4 million in adjustments to assets and liabilities classified as held for sale. See Note 17 - Discontinued Operations.

58


Table of Contents

(3) Revenue

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents revenues by segment disaggregated by geography (in thousands):

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2020

 

U.S. land

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

$

160,742

 

 

$

87,432

 

 

 

$

4,917

 

 

$

78,537

 

Well Services

 

 

24,558

 

 

 

20,133

 

 

 

 

3,379

 

 

 

26,924

 

Total U.S. land

 

 

185,300

 

 

 

107,565

 

 

 

 

8,296

 

 

 

105,461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. offshore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

140,881

 

 

 

103,646

 

 

 

 

8,196

 

 

 

129,021

 

Well Services

 

 

122,848

 

 

 

93,412

 

 

 

 

7,371

 

 

 

104,559

 

Total U.S. offshore

 

 

263,729

 

 

 

197,058

 

 

 

 

15,567

 

 

 

233,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

101,319

 

 

 

77,617

 

 

 

 

5,226

 

 

 

90,277

 

Well Services

 

 

333,612

 

 

 

266,514

 

 

 

 

16,839

 

 

 

237,931

 

Total International

 

 

434,931

 

 

 

344,131

 

 

 

 

22,065

 

 

 

328,208

 

Total Revenues

 

$

883,960

 

 

$

648,754

 

 

 

$

45,928

 

 

$

667,249

 

The following table presents revenues by segment disaggregated by type (in thousands):

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2020

 

Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

$

53,029

 

 

$

33,629

 

 

 

$

2,005

 

 

$

45,226

 

Well Services

 

 

333,746

 

 

 

272,070

 

 

 

 

17,229

 

 

 

254,157

 

Total Services

 

 

386,775

 

 

 

305,699

 

 

 

 

19,234

 

 

 

299,383

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

299,128

 

 

 

197,050

 

 

 

 

14,082

 

 

 

215,163

 

Well Services

 

 

10,186

 

 

 

11,901

 

 

 

 

352

 

 

 

10,200

 

Total Rentals

 

 

309,314

 

 

 

208,951

 

 

 

 

14,434

 

 

 

225,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

50,786

 

 

 

38,016

 

 

 

 

2,252

 

 

 

37,446

 

Well Services

 

 

137,085

 

 

 

96,088

 

 

 

 

10,008

 

 

 

105,057

 

Total Product Sales

 

 

187,871

 

 

 

134,104

 

 

 

 

12,260

 

 

 

142,503

 

Total Revenues

 

$

883,960

 

 

$

648,754

 

 

 

$

45,928

 

 

$

667,249

 

(4) Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We apply net realizable value and obsolescence to the gross value of inventory. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out or weighted-average cost methods for finished goods and work-in-process. Supplies and consumables consist principally of products used in the services provided to our customers. The components of inventory balances are as follows (in thousands):

59


Table of Contents

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 Finished goods

 

$

36,136

 

 

 

$

26,187

 

 Raw materials

 

 

8,351

 

 

 

 

9,753

 

 Work-in-process

 

 

4,718

 

 

 

 

4,253

 

 Supplies and consumables

 

 

16,382

 

 

 

 

20,410

 

 Total

 

$

65,587

 

 

 

$

60,603

 

Finished goods inventory includes component parts awaiting assembly of approximately $20.7 million and $15.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(5) Decommissioning Liability

We account for our decommissioning liability under ASC 410 – Asset Retirement Obligations. Our decommissioning liability is associated with our oil and gas property and includes costs related to the plugging of wells, decommissioning of the platform and related equipment and site restoration. We review the adequacy of our decommissioning liability whenever indicators suggest that the estimated cash flows and/or timing needed to satisfy the liability have changed materially.

During 2022, we revised our decommissioning program as follows:

During the second quarter of 2022, we undertook an initiative to alter our decommissioning program, whereby we intend to convert the platform into an artificial reef (“reef-in-place”). The reef-in-place program would involve severing the top portion of the structure at a permitted navigation depth and placing the severed structure on the sea floor next to the base of the remaining structure. Converting to a reef-in-place program reduced the estimated costs associated with decommissioning the wells and platform, and also impacted the time required to complete the decommissioning activities.

The reduction in cost estimates under a reef-in-place program resulted in a reduction in the carrying value of our decommissioning liability and related note receivable as discussed in Note 6 - Note Receivable, as well as impacted the carrying value of our oil and gas producing assets, such that as of June 30, 2022, our decommissioning liability was reduced by $53.0 million and the related note receivable was increased by $2.6 million. In accordance with ASC 410, the carrying value of our oil and gas producing assets was reduced by $38.2 million, which represented the net book value of our oil and gas assets at June 30, 2022. In connection with these changes, we recognized a gain of approximately $17.4 million, which is included in other (gains) and losses, net in our statement of operations.

During the fourth quarter of 2022, information received from the operator of our oil and gas property raised concerns regarding the economic viability of the remaining well recompletions, which caused us to modify our planned well completions schedule. This change resulted in the acceleration of the estimated remaining life expectancy of the oil and gas assets. Concurrent with this ongoing analysis, the operator of our oil and gas property received a notice from the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement regarding idle wells, which was aligned with the actions we were initiating. In response, in December 2022, we revised our estimates relating to the timing and the cost of decommissioning the wells.

We now estimate all decommissioning activities, including the decommissioning of the platform, to be completed by the second quarter of 2030. Previously, we had expected final decommissioning activities to be completed by the second quarter of 2031. Due to the upward revision in decommissioning costs for the wells, and an acceleration in timing to decommission the wells and platform, at December 31, 2022, our decommissioning liability was increased by $13.8 million, the related note receivable was increased by $2.7 million and we recorded an asset retirement cost asset of $11.1 million.

The following table presents the activity during 2022 impacting our decommissioning liability, the related note receivable and oil and gas producing assets:

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 

 

2022 Activity
(1)

 

 

Reef-in-place Adjustment

 

 

Year End 2022 Adjustment

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

 Decommissioning Liability

 

$

190,380

 

 

$

9,500

 

 

$

(53,028

)

 

$

13,819

 

 

$

160,671

 

 Note Receivable

 

 

60,588

 

 

 

3,823

 

 

 

2,581

 

 

 

2,687

 

 

 

69,679

 

 Oil and gas producing assets, net

 

 

41,582

 

 

 

(2,790

)

 

 

(38,235

)

 

 

11,132

 

 

 

11,689

 

(1)
Activity during 2022 relates to accretion of the decommissioning liability, interest income on the note receivable and depletion and capital expenditures, net to the oil and gas producing assets.

The following table presents our decommissioning liability as of the periods indicated:

60


Table of Contents

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 Wells

 

$

96,171

 

 

$

97,810

 

 Platform

 

 

64,500

 

 

 

92,570

 

 Decommissioning Liability

 

 

160,671

 

 

 

190,380

 

 Less: Note Receivable

 

 

(69,679

)

 

 

(60,588

)

 Decommissioning Liability, net of Note Receivable

 

$

90,992

 

 

$

129,792

 

Accretion expense associated with our decommissioning liability during the Current Period, the Successor Period, the Predecessor Period and the Prior Period was $9.5 million was $9.3 million and $0.5 million, and $6.5 million, respectively.

(6) Note Receivable

Our note receivable consist of a commitment from the seller of oil and gas property for costs associated with abandonment. Pursuant to an agreement with the seller, we invoice the seller an agreed upon amount at the completion of certain decommissioning activities.

As discussed above, changes in estimates regarding the timing and the cost of decommissioning our oil and gas property under a reef-in-place program during the second quarter of 2022 resulted in a $2.6 million increase in the carrying value of our note receivable.

As discussed above, due to revisions in estimates in both costs and timing of decommissioning the wells associated with our oil and gas property, at December 31, 2022, the related note receivable was increased by $2.7 million.

Due to the reduction in estimated costs under the reef-in-place program and revisions to the timing of the expected completion of the platform decommissioning activities, the gross amount of the seller’s obligation is $105.2 million. The carrying value of the note receivable totaled $69.7 million as of December 31, 2022.

The discount on the notes receivable, which is currently based on an effective interest rate of 5.6%, is amortized to interest income over the expected timing of the completion of the decommissioning activities. Interest receivable is considered paid in kind and is compounded into the carrying amount of the note.

We recorded non-cash interest income related to the note receivable of $3.8 million, $3.9 million, $0.4 million and $4.5 million related to our notes receivable during the Current Period, the Successor Period, the Predecessor Period and the Prior Period, respectively. Interest income is included in other reconciling items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

(7) Leases

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. All of our leases are operating leases and are included in ROU assets, accounts payable and operating lease liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligations to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the respective lease term. We use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease.

Our operating leases are primarily for real estate, machinery and equipment, and vehicles. The terms and conditions for these leases vary by the type of underlying asset. Total operating lease expense was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2020

 

Long-term fixed lease expense

 

$

9,761

 

 

$

12,579

 

 

 

$

1,824

 

 

$

18,454

 

Long-term variable lease expense

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

10

 

Short-term lease expense

 

 

22,705

 

 

 

10,165

 

 

 

 

789

 

 

 

4,322

 

Total operating lease expense

 

$

32,468

 

 

$

22,744

 

 

 

$

2,632

 

 

$

22,786

 

61


Table of Contents

Operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

Operating lease ROU assets

 

$

18,797

 

 

$

25,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

$

4,033

 

 

$

5,650

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

14,634

 

 

 

19,193

 

Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

18,667

 

 

$

24,843

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average remaining lease term

 

18 years

 

 

15 years

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

5.33%

 

 

5.34%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for operating leases

 

$

7,395

 

 

$

13,591

 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations

 

 

5,069

 

 

 

2,820

 

During the Current Year, cash paid for operating leases totaled $7.4 million and ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligation were $5.1 million.

Maturities of operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2022 are as follows (in thousands):

 2023

 

$

5,805

 

 2024

 

 

4,301

 

 2025

 

 

3,284

 

 2026

 

 

1,573

 

 2027

 

 

588

 

 Thereafter

 

 

14,747

 

 Total lease payments

 

 

30,298

 

 Less imputed interest

 

 

(11,631

)

 Total

 

$

18,667

 

(8) Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

A summary of property, plant and equipment, net is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 Machinery and equipment

 

$

378,907

 

 

$

360,353

 

 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements

 

 

70,816

 

 

 

75,374

 

 Automobiles, trucks, tractors and trailers

 

 

6,376

 

 

 

6,450

 

 Furniture and fixtures

 

 

19,373

 

 

 

19,668

 

 Construction-in-progress

 

 

5,185

 

 

 

6,700

 

 Land

 

 

26,695

 

 

 

28,671

 

 Oil and gas producing assets

 

 

11,714

 

 

 

44,700

 

 Total

 

 

519,066

 

 

 

541,916

 

 Accumulated depreciation and depletion

 

 

(236,690

)

 

 

(185,642

)

 Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

282,376

 

 

$

356,274

 

We had $7.1 million and $7.2 million of leasehold improvements at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the lease using the straight line method. Oil and gas producing assets include capitalized asset retirement costs associated with our oil and gas property.

Depreciation and depletion expense associated with our property, plant and equipment for the Current Period was $87.6 million. Depreciation and depletion expense, excluding depreciation related to assets held for sale, for the year ended for the Successor Period, Predecessor Period and the Prior Period was $209.7 million, $7.8 million and $108.0 million, respectively. See Note 17 - Discontinued Operations for a discussion of depreciation expense related to our discontinued operations.

As discussed above, depreciation expense in the Successor Period was impacted by the valuation process under fresh start accounting. Certain fully depreciated assets were assigned an estimated fair value of approximately $197.5 million and a remaining useful life of less than 36 months which significantly increased the amount of depreciation expense recorded in the Successor Period. Depreciation expense for these previously fully depreciated assets was $167.5 million for the Successor Period.

62


Table of Contents

Gains and losses on disposals of assets are recognized within other (gains) and losses, net in our statement of operations. Prior to the Emergence Date, we recognized gains and losses on the disposal of assets within general and administrative expenses.

During the second quarter of 2022, changes in estimates regarding the timing and cost of decommissioning our oil and gas property under a reef-in-place program impacted the carrying value of our oil and gas producing assets. In accordance with ASC 410, the carrying value of our oil and gas producing assets, which included capitalized oil and gas reserves and capitalized asset retirement costs, was reduced by $38.2 million, which represented the net book value of all of our oil and gas assets at June 30, 2022.

As discussed above, due to revisions in estimates in both costs and timing of decommissioning the wells associated with our oil and gas property, at December 31, 2022, we recorded capitalized asset retirement costs of $11.1 million.

(9) Debt

Credit Facility

On the Emergence Date, pursuant to the Plan, we entered into a Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders and letter of credit issuers named therein providing for a $120.0 million asset-based secured revolving Credit Facility, all of which is available for the issuance of letters of credit (the “Credit Facility”). The issuance of letters of credit will reduce availability under the Credit Facility dollar-for-dollar.

As of December 31, 2022, the borrowing base under the Credit Facility was approximately $120.0 million and we had $34.9 million of letters of credit outstanding that reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility. We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2022.

(10) Stock-Based Compensation Plans

2021 Management Incentive Plan

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) have approved and adopted our Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”), which provides for the grant of share-based and cash-based awards and, in connection therewith, the issuance from time to time of up to 1,999,869 shares of our Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share. To date, grants under the MIP have been in the form of shares of Class B common stock ("RSAs"), restricted stock units which will be settled in Class B common stock upon the satisfaction of time-based vesting conditions ("RSUs") and performance stock units which will be settled in Class B common stock upon the satisfaction of time-based vesting conditions and performance-based vesting conditions ("PSUs").

The RSAs vest over a period of three years, subject to earlier vesting and forfeiture on terms and conditions set forth in the applicable award agreement. RSUs granted in 2022 generally vest in three equal annual installments over the three-year period, subject generally to continued employment and the other terms and conditions set forth in the forms of the RSU award agreements. RSUs granted in 2021 vest in full in the first quarter of 2023, subject generally to continued employment and the other terms and conditions set forth in the forms of the RSU award agreements. PSUs may be earned between 25% and 100% of the target award based on achievement of share price goals set forth in the forms of the PSU award agreements and will vest to the extent that share price goals are achieved based on the terms and conditions set forth in the forms of the PSU award agreements.

The following sets forth issuances under the MIP:

In June 2021, we issued 76,269 RSAs with a grant date fair value of $39.53 per share. During the Current Period, 42,389 RSAs vested and 3,904 RSAs were forfeited and placed in treasury. The unamortized estimated grant date fair value as of December 31, 2022 was approximately $0.8 million.

During the third quarter of 2021, we granted 50,596 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $39.53 per share. During the Current Period, 10,437 shares vested and 2,212 shares were forfeited. The unamortized estimated grant date fair value as of December 31, 2022 was immaterial. All RSUs granted in 2021 are scheduled to vest in the first quarter of 2023.

In March 2022, we granted 72,050 RSUs and 288,199 PSUs which was intended to satisfy stock awards for the next three years. Additional grants may be issued for new hires and promotions. The grant date fair value of the RSUs was estimated to be $58.80 per share. The unamortized estimated grant date fair value as of December 31, 2022 was $3.1 million.

63


Table of Contents

In July 2022, we granted 88,215 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $58.80 per share. The unamortized estimated grant date fair value as of December 31, 2022 was $4.2 million.

During the Current Period we recognized $4.8 million in compensation expense associated with grants of RSAs and RSUs. We are currently not amortizing the PSUs as we have not concluded that it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved.

During the Predecessor Period and the Successor Period, we recognized $0.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively, in compensation cost associated with grants of restricted stock and RSUs.

As a result of the consummation of the Plan, restricted stock units issued prior to the Emergence Date were canceled for zero consideration. Reorganization items, net in the Predecessor Period include $0.9 million in costs associated with the cancellation of the pre-Emergence outstanding restricted stock units.

Liability-Classified Compensation

401(k)

We maintain a defined contribution profit sharing plan for employees who have satisfied minimum service requirements. Employees may contribute up to 75% of their eligible earnings to the plan subject to the contribution limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. We provide a nondiscretionary match of 100% of an employee’s contributions to the plan, up to 4% of the employee’s salary. We made contributions of $3.1 million, $2.6 million, $0.4 million and $6.2 million during December 31, 2022, the Successor Period, the Predecessor Period and in 2020, respectively.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

We have a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”). The SERP provides retirement benefits to our executive officers and certain other designated key employees. The SERP is an unfunded, non-qualified defined contribution retirement plan, and all contributions under the plan are unfunded credits to a notional account maintained for each participant. Prior to January 1, 2020, under the SERP, we made annual contributions to a retirement account based on age and years of service. The participants in the plan received contributions ranging from 5% to 35% of salary and annual cash bonus, which totaled $0 million during 2020. We made payments to eligible participants in the SERP of $1.7 million and $3.4 million during 2022 and the Successor Period, respectively. No payments were made during the Predecessor Period or during 2020.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“NQDC Plan”) provides an income deferral opportunity for executive officers and certain senior managers who qualified for participation. Participants in the NQDC Plan could make an advance election each year to defer portions of their base salary, bonus and other compensation. Payments made to participants are based on their enrollment elections and plan balances. No deferrals were elected for 2022. We have not had enrollment periods for the NQDC since 2019.

64


Table of Contents

(11) Income Taxes

The income tax provision is as follows:

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

In thousands:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

Current income tax expense/(benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Federal

$

(50

)

 

$

(1,106

)

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(36,506

)

     State

 

945

 

 

 

(307

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

635

 

     Foreign

 

23,738

 

 

 

6,220

 

 

 

 

3,314

 

 

 

8,497

 

          Total current income tax expense/(benefit)

 

24,633

 

 

 

4,807

 

 

 

 

3,314

 

 

 

(27,374

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax expense/(benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Federal

 

(83,420

)

 

 

(42,904

)

 

 

 

55,015

 

 

 

4,593

 

     State

 

165

 

 

 

2,633

 

 

 

 

(182

)

 

 

(638

)

     Foreign

 

(19,097

)

 

 

2,166

 

 

 

 

1,856

 

 

 

(3,469

)

          Total deferred income tax expense/(benefit)

 

(102,352

)

 

 

(38,105

)

 

 

 

56,689

 

 

 

486

 

Total income tax expense/(benefit)

$

(77,719

)

 

$

(33,298

)

 

 

$

60,003

 

 

$

(26,888

)

For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized a worthless stock deduction in the U.S. related to deductible outside basis differences in certain domestic subsidiaries, which is the primary driver of the increase in federal deferred tax. We executed a transaction through which a worthless stock deduction of approximately $495.2 million was deducted for income tax purposes resulting in an estimated net tax benefit of $104.0 million. Consistent with our policy, we evaluated the deduction and believe it will more likely than not be sustained on its technical merits and have recognized its benefits accordingly.

During the Current Period, U.S. rental income and foreign tax from foreign jurisdictions increased. Additionally, income in a few of our foreign operations improved. In these jurisdictions, namely Brazil, we benefitted from the release of a valuation allowance due to a pattern of sustained profitability such that it is viewed as more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized.

On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), a tax relief and spending package intended to provide economic stimulus to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act allows corporations with net operating losses generated in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to elect to carryback those losses for a period of five years and relaxes the limitation for business interest deductions for 2019 and 2020. Under the provisions of the CARES Act, we received a refund of $30.5 million in July 2020 related to the carryback of the 2018 net operating loss and received a refund of $8.2 million in February 2021 related to the carryback of the 2019 net operating loss.

Effective in tax year 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminates the option to deduct research and development expenditures in the current period and requires taxpayers to capitalize and amortize them over five or fifteen years pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 174. The legislation did not have a material impact in our business, operating results, and financial condition

65


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory federal tax rate to the consolidated effective tax rate is as follows:

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

Continuing Operations (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 Computed expected tax expense/(benefit)

$

44,798

 

 

$

(32,635

)

 

 

$

69,125

 

 

$

(53,431

)

      State and foreign income taxes

 

(350

)

 

 

(17,893

)

 

 

 

6,217

 

 

 

5,026

 

      Valuation allowance

 

(13,140

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(46,208

)

 

 

19,024

 

      Gain on Settlement of Liabilities Subject to Compromise

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(89,905

)

 

 

-

 

      Reduction in Deferred Tax Assets

 

 

 

 

19,154

 

 

 

 

87,316

 

 

 

-

 

      Fresh Start Adjustments

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

29,099

 

 

 

-

 

 Worthless stock deduction

 

(103,992

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

   Foreign Tax Credit

 

(5,161

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

      Other

 

126

 

 

 

(1,924

)

 

 

 

4,359

 

 

 

2,493

 

 Total income tax expense/(benefit)

$

(77,719

)

 

$

(33,298

)

 

 

$

60,003

 

 

$

(26,888

)

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the total tax provision differs from the tax computed using the standard tax rate primarily due to the worthless stock deduction of $104.0 million previously discussed. In addition, due to increased profitability, we released several valuation allowances including a $14.5 million related our U.S. foreign tax credit (“FTC”) carryforward and $8.7 million related to Brazil deferred tax assets primarily consisting of NOL carryforward.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we evaluated the tax impact resulting from our emergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on February 2, 2021 and the Plan. As part of the debt restructuring, a substantial portion of our pre-petition debt was extinguished. Absent an exception, a taxpayer recognizes cancellation of indebtedness income (“CODI”) upon discharge of its outstanding indebtedness for an amount of consideration that is less than its adjusted issue price. A taxpayer in bankruptcy may exclude CODI from taxable income but must first reduce its tax attributes by the amount of CODI realized. When the debt was extinguished, we realized CODI for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $433.0 million. The CODI exclusion resulted in a partial elimination of our federal net operating loss carryforwards, as well as a partial reduction in tax basis in assets, primarily property, plant and equipment. The CODI also eliminated $19.2 million of state NOL deferred tax asset which resulted in a corresponding reduction in the state valuation allowance.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 provides an annual limitation with respect to the ability of a corporation to utilize its tax attributes, as well as certain built-in-losses, against future U.S. taxable income in the event of a change in ownership. We experienced an ownership change on February 2, 2021, as defined in Section 382, due to the Plan. The limitation under Section 382 is based on the value of the corporation as of the Emergence Date. Currently, we do not expect the Section 382 limitation to impact our ability to use U.S. NOLs and FTC carryover tax attributes due to qualification for relief under Section 382.

66


Table of Contents

Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

In thousands:

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

1,374

 

 

$

1,046

 

 Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

 

157,395

 

 

 

84,684

 

 Compensation and employee benefits

 

7,376

 

 

 

8,832

 

 Decommissioning liabilities

 

39,328

 

 

 

39,328

 

 Goodwill and other intangible assets

 

369

 

 

 

772

 

 Operating leases

 

126

 

 

 

197

 

 Other Asset

 

52,345

 

 

 

30,749

 

 Total gross deferred tax assets

 

258,313

 

 

 

165,608

 

 Less: Valuation allowance

 

(80,280

)

 

 

(90,781

)

 Total deferred tax assets

$

178,033

 

 

 

74,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 Property, plant and equipment

$

64,571

 

 

$

64,721

 

 Notes receivable

 

17,812

 

 

 

17,812

 

 Other Liability

 

1,546

 

 

 

1,287

 

 Total deferred tax liabilities

$

83,929

 

 

$

83,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

$

94,104

 

 

$

(8,993

)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the consolidated financial statements. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on enacted tax laws and rates currently in effect in each of the jurisdictions in which we have operations. In recording deferred income tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income of the appropriate character during the periods in which those deferred income tax assets would be deductible. We consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations for this determination.

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets for the U.S. FTC carryovers is dependent on the generation of future taxable income of the appropriate character during the FTC carryforward period. We previously considered FTC credit carryforwards to be unrealizable primarily due to our cumulative history of losses in the U.S. and Sec. 382 tax attribute utilization limits resulting from bankruptcy. During 2022, we determined there is now enough positive evidence to realize a portion of the tax benefit related to U.S. FTC carryforwards. This is due to a pattern of sustained profitability in the U.S. since we emerged from bankruptcy and capacity relief under Section 382. The amount of valuation allowance released recognizes the FTC deferred tax assets we estimate will offset U.S. taxes in the next 2-3 years before expiration. We have $40.0 million of U.S. FTC deferred tax assets that continue to have a valuation allowance against them, including $5.2 million in 2022 FTCs that carryforward up to 10 years. We will continue to evaluate the realizability of U.S. FTCs in future years.

A valuation allowance has been placed on the state net operating losses. Similarly, with the exception of Brazil, the deferred tax assets on the majority of our foreign operation jurisdictions continue to require a valuation allowance.

The amount of our net deferred tax assets considered realizable could be adjusted if projections of future taxable income are reduced or objective negative evidence in the form of a three-year cumulative loss is present or both. Should we no longer have a level of sustained profitability, excluding non-recurring charges, we will have to rely more on our future projections of taxable income to determine if we have an adequate source of taxable income for the realization of our deferred tax assets, namely NOL, interest limitation, and tax credit carryforwards. This may result in the need to record a valuation allowance against all or a portion of our deferred tax assets.

The amount of U.S. consolidated net operating losses available as of December 31, 2022, after attribute reduction, is estimated to be approximately $367.9 million, which are available to reduce future taxable income, of which $20.4 million have a 20-year carryforward period and expire after 2036 and $347.5 million have an indefinite carryforward but are limited to offsetting 80% of taxable income each year. At December 31, 2022, we also had various state net operating loss carryforwards with expiration dates starting in 2022. The state net operating losses net deferred tax asset of $19.6 million has a full valuation allowance. At December 31, 2022, we also had a U.S. foreign tax credit carryforward of $59.7 million with expiration dates from 2024 to 2032. A partial valuation

67


Table of Contents

allowance was setup against the foreign tax credit carryforward in the amount of $40.0 million, which will more-likely-than-not expire before being utilized.

We have not provided additional US income tax expense on foreign earnings of foreign affiliates. At December 31, 2022 our foreign subsidiaries had an overall accumulated deficit in earnings. We are repatriating from foreign subsidiaries and the distributions are not subject to incremental US taxation because they represent either 1) return of basis where there is not current or accumulated earnings and profits, 2) previously taxed earnings and profits or 3) foreign earnings exempt from incremental US tax. We file income tax returns in the U.S., including federal and various state filings, and certain foreign jurisdictions. The number of years that are open under the statute of limitations and subject to audit varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. We remain subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years after 2018.

The activity in unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

In thousands:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

$

14,973

 

 

$

14,706

 

 

 

$

13,206

 

 

$

13,206

 

 Additions based on tax positions related to prior years

 

569

 

 

 

2,848

 

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

1,757

 

 Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years

 

(334

)

 

 

(552

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Additions based on tax positions related to current year

 

78

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(757

)

 Reductions relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

(1,277

)

 

 

(2,029

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,000

)

 Unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

$

14,009

 

 

$

14,973

 

 

 

$

14,706

 

 

$

13,206

 

We had unrecognized tax benefits of $14.0 million as of December 31, 2022, and $15.0 million as of December 31, 2021, all of which would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. It is reasonably possible that $9.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits could be settled in the next twelve-month period due to the conclusion of tax audits or due to the expiration of statute of limitations. It is our policy to recognize interest and applicable penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

The amounts above includes accrued interest and penalties of $7.2 million and $6.9 million for periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(12) Earnings per Share

Our common equity consists of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (the “Common Stock”).

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Stock outstanding during the period plus any potentially dilutive Common Stock, such as restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and performance-based units calculated using the treasury stock method.

The following table presents the reconciliation between the weighted average number of shares for basic and diluted earnings per share.

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic

 

 

20,024

 

 

 

19,998

 

 

 

 

14,845

 

 Potentially dilutive stock awards and units

 

 

63

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

60

 

 Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

20,087

 

 

 

19,998

 

 

 

 

14,905

 

(13) Segment Information

Our reportable segments are Rentals and Well Services.

68


Table of Contents

Business Segments

The products and service offerings of Rentals are comprised of value-added engineering and design services, rental of premium drill strings, tubing, landing strings, completion tubulars and handling accessories, manufacturing and rental of bottom hole assemblies, and rentals of accommodation units.

The products and service offerings of Well Services are comprised of risk management, well control and training solutions, hydraulic workover and snubbing services, engineering and manufacturing of premium sand control tools, and onshore international production services. The Well Services segment also includes the operations of our offshore oil and gas property.

We evaluate the performance of our reportable segments based on income or loss from operations. The segment measure is calculated as segment revenues less segment operating expenses, including general and administrative expenses, depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense and other (gains) and losses, net. We use this segment measure to evaluate our reportable segments as it is the measure that is most consistent with how we organize and manage our business operations. Corporate and other costs primarily include expenses related to support functions, including salaries and benefits for corporate employees.

Summarized financial information for our segments is as follows (in thousands):

 For the year ended December 31, 2022 (Successor)

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate and

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 Revenues

 

$

402,942

 

 

$

481,018

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

883,960

 

 Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

137,626

 

 

 

339,325

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

476,951

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

58,731

 

 

 

34,841

 

 

 

4,488

 

 

 

98,060

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

28,139

 

 

 

45,898

 

 

 

54,257

 

 

 

128,294

 

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,375

 

 

 

6,375

 

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(5,190

)

 

 

(23,575

)

 

 

(369

)

 

 

(29,134

)

 Income (loss) from operations

 

$

183,636

 

 

$

84,529

 

 

$

(64,751

)

 

$

203,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 For the Period February 3, 2021 through December 31, 2021 (Successor)

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate and

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 Revenues

 

$

268,695

 

 

$

380,059

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

648,754

 

 Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

105,373

 

 

 

316,879

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

422,252

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

152,250

 

 

 

61,074

 

 

 

6,535

 

 

 

219,859

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

24,812

 

 

 

46,780

 

 

 

45,983

 

 

 

117,575

 

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

22,952

 

 

 

22,952

 

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

3,609

 

 

 

13,117

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,726

 

 Income (loss) from operations

 

$

(17,349

)

 

$

(57,791

)

 

$

(75,470

)

 

$

(150,610

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 For the Period January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021 (Predecessor)

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate and

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

$

18,339

 

 

$

27,589

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

45,928

 

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

21,934

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

29,773

 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

4,271

 

 

 

3,666

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

8,358

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

2,027

 

 

 

4,111

 

 

 

4,914

 

 

 

11,052

 

Restructuring expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

1,270

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

$

4,202

 

 

$

(2,122

)

 

$

(6,605

)

 

$

(4,525

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 For the year ended December 31, 2020 (Predecessor)

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate and

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 Revenues

 

$

297,835

 

 

$

369,414

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

667,249

 

 Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

 

 

109,902

 

 

 

298,229

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

408,131

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

63,072

 

 

 

48,929

 

 

 

3,770

 

 

 

115,771

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

52,718

 

 

 

73,200

 

 

 

79,855

 

 

 

205,773

 

 Restructuring expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

47,055

 

 

 

47,055

 

 Reduction in value of assets

 

 

754

 

 

 

21,038

 

 

 

1,983

 

 

 

23,775

 

 Income (loss) from operations

 

$

71,389

 

 

$

(71,982

)

 

$

(132,663

)

 

$

(133,256

)

Identifiable Assets

69


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

and Other

 

 

Total

 

December 31, 2022

 

$

432,437

 

 

$

533,327

 

 

$

225,248

 

 

$

1,191,012

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

379,453

 

 

 

636,256

 

 

 

183,799

 

 

 

1,199,508

 

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Corporate and Other segment included $12.0 million and $37.5 million of identifiable assets relating to assets held for sale. Additionally, the Corporate and Other segment as of December 31, 2022 includes $97.5 million of non-current deferred tax assets. For further discussion see Note 17 - Discontinued Operations.

Capital Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

Well

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Rentals

 

 

Services

 

 

and Other

 

 

Total

 

December 31, 2022

 

$

54,126

 

 

$

10,729

 

 

$

929

 

 

$

65,784

 

For the period from February 3, 2021 through December 31, 2021

 

 

27,335

 

 

 

6,817

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

34,152

 

For the period from January 1, 2021 through February 2, 2021 (Predecessor)

 

 

2,429

 

 

 

606

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,035

 

December 31, 2020 (Predecessor)

 

 

24,053

 

 

 

19,609

 

 

 

3,991

 

 

 

47,653

 

Geographic Information

We operate in the U.S. and in various other countries throughout the world. Our international operations are primarily focused in Latin America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East and North Africa regions. We attribute revenue to various countries based on the location where services are performed or the destination of the drilling products or equipment sold or rented. See Note 3 - Revenues for a detail of our domestic and international revenues. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment and are attributed to various countries based on the physical location of the asset at the end of a period.

Long-Lived Assets

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 United States

 

$

212,534

 

 

$

231,388

 

 Other countries

 

 

69,842

 

 

 

124,886

 

 Total

 

$

282,376

 

 

$

356,274

 

(14) Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs used in determining fair value are characterized according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputs based on the degree to which they are observable. The three input levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets or model-derived valuations or other inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

70


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 Non-qualified deferred compensation assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Other long-term assets, net

 

$

-

 

 

$

16,299

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

16,299

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,831

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,831

 

 Other long-term liabilities

 

 

-

 

 

 

15,855

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

15,855

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Investment in equity securities

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 Non-qualified deferred compensation assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Other long-term assets, net

 

$

-

 

 

$

15,896

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

15,896

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,250

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,250

 

 Other long-term liabilities

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,218

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,218

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Investment in equity securities

 

$

25,735

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

25,735

 

Our non-qualified deferred compensation plans allow officers, certain highly compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and contribute such amounts to one or more hypothetical investment funds. These investments are reported at fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identifiable assets and observable inputs for similar assets and liabilities, which represent a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy depending on the type of investment. Commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases automatically stayed payments under the non-qualified deferred compensation plans. As a result of the consummation of the Plan, restricted stock units issued prior to the Fresh Start Accounting Date under our stock incentive plans were canceled for zero consideration.

Investment in equity securities related to our ownership in common stock of Select Energy Services, Inc. ("Select"). This investment was reported at fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices which are readily determinable, which represents a Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying amount of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets, approximates fair value due to the short maturities. We historically utilized unadjusted quoted prices in the market for measuring the fair value of debt.

(15) Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) primarily relate to re-measurement gains and losses associated with our foreign currencies and realized and unrealized gains and losses on our investment in common stock of Select.

Losses on foreign currencies during the Current Period, the Successor Period, the Predecessor Period and the Prior Period were $12.6 million, $8.8 million, $2.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively. Losses on foreign currencies during the Current Period include an expense of $2.7 million which represents a correction of an immaterial error relating to a period prior to our emergence from bankruptcy. Gains and losses on foreign currencies are primarily related to our operations in Brazil and Argentina.

During the Current Period, we disposed of 4.1 million shares of Select for $34.7 million, and we recognized gains totaling $8.9 million in connection with these transactions. During the Successor Period, we disposed of 0.7 million shares of Select for $4.1 million, and we recognized gains totaling $0.4 million. Unrealized gains during the Successor Period were $2.1 million. As of December 31, 2022, all shares of Select have been disposed.

(16) Contingencies

Due to the nature of our business, we are involved, from time to time, in various routine litigation or subject to disputes or claims or actions, including those commercial in nature, regarding our business activities in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs related to these matters are expensed as incurred. Management is of the opinion that none of the claims and actions will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

71


Table of Contents

A subsidiary of ours is involved in legal proceedings with two former employees regarding the payment of royalties for a patentable product paid for by the subsidiary and developed while they worked for the subsidiary. Those former employees have filed separate two lawsuits in the Harris County District Court, in which the former employees allege that the royalty payments they had invoiced at 25% and for which they received payments in the invoiced amounts since 2010, instead should have been paid at a rate of 50%. The first lawsuit (the “First Case”), filed during the second quarter of 2018, sought to recover alleged unpaid royalties from May 2014 through May 2019. The second lawsuit (the “Second Case”) was filed in the same district court against the same subsidiary of ours, brought the same claims, and sought damages post-judgment from the First Case until the discontinuation of the leasing of the product at issue by the subsidiary at the end of 2019.

In both lawsuits, the district court ruled against our subsidiary and entered final judgments, which we fully secured with a bond. We strongly disagreed with the result and believed the district court committed several legal errors that should be corrected by reversal of each of the judgments. Accordingly, we pursued separate appeals in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

In August 2022, in the appeal from the judgment in the First Case, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals (the "Court of Appeals") ruled in favor of our subsidiary on the plaintiffs’ claims for a combined 50% royalty. The Court of Appeals ruled that because the plaintiffs invoiced our subsidiary for a combined 25% royalty and accepted payments in that amount every month since 2010, the plaintiffs forever waived any claim to any royalties in any amount other than a combined 25% royalty, net of expenses. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment in the First Case and remanded to the district court to assess damages, if any, owed for royalties between January 2018 and May 2019.

The appeal from the judgment in the Second Case was abated by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals pending the resolution of the appeal in the First Case.

On October 7, 2022, our subsidiary reached a confidential settlement in both the First Case and the Second Case with the plaintiffs to resolve any and all disputes between them. At the request of both parties in the appeals from both the First Case and the Second Case, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals has reversed the respective judgments entered by the district court. The district court has now entered take-nothing judgments in favor of our subsidiary in both cases and has released the supersedeas bonds filed by our subsidiary in both cases. Accordingly, both the First Case and the Second Case are fully and finally resolved.

Our Indian subsidiary, SES Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd (“SES India”), entered into a contract with an Indian oil and gas company to provide an offshore vessel for well stimulation. A dispute arose over the performability of the terms of the contract. The contract was terminated by the customer. Any remaining contingency under this contract was terminated in connection with SES India entering into bankruptcy during 2022.

In October 2022, we had a hearing before the Washington State Board of Tax Appeals (the “Tax Board”) in relation to a dispute arising in April 2019 pertaining to a use tax assessment from 2016 as a result of the construction of a vessel by one of our subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2022, the assessment, including interest, totaled $26.9 million. While we are confident that the assessment is legally insupportable, if the Tax Board upholds the assessment we will be responsible for payment of the full assessment within thirty days of the decision. Although we are unable to estimate the probability of the outcome of this matter or the range of reasonably possible loss, if any, we have reserved an amount we believe to be adequate to cover any final assessment levied by the state.

72


Table of Contents

(17) Discontinued Operations

The following table summarizes the components of loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (in thousands):

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

Revenues

 

$

-

 

 

$

90,682

 

 

 

$

10,719

 

 

$

184,580

 

Cost of services

 

 

-

 

 

 

85,191

 

 

 

 

10,398

 

 

 

180,408

 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

-

 

 

 

31,502

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

 

 

31,022

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

8,043

 

 

 

8,847

 

 

 

 

1,119

 

 

 

22,035

 

Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(2,249

)

 

 

15,807

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Reduction in value of assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

117,335

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(5,794

)

 

 

(50,665

)

 

 

 

(2,939

)

 

 

(166,220

)

Other income (expense)

 

 

-

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

 

2,485

 

 

 

(2,069

)

Loss from discontinued operations before tax

 

 

(5,794

)

 

 

(50,477

)

 

 

 

(454

)

 

 

(168,289

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

1,217

 

 

 

10,408

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

(398

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax

 

$

(4,577

)

 

$

(40,069

)

 

 

$

(352

)

 

$

(168,687

)

The following summarizes the assets and liabilities related to the business reported as discontinued operations (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts receivable, net

 

$

350

 

 

$

7,469

 

 Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

11,468

 

 

 

29,328

 

 Other assets

 

 

160

 

 

 

731

 

 Total assets held for sale

 

$

11,978

 

 

$

37,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

$

86

 

 

$

652

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

3,192

 

 

 

4,268

 

 Other liabilities

 

 

71

 

 

 

687

 

 Total liabilities held for sale

 

$

3,349

 

 

$

5,607

 

Significant operating non-cash items and cash flows from investing activities for our discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Reduction in value of assets

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

117,335

 

 (Gain)/loss on sale of assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(43

)

 

 

286

 

 Other (gains) and losses, net

 

 

(2,249

)

 

 

15,807

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

 

 

-

 

 

 

31,502

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

 

 

31,022

 

Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Proceeds from sales of assets

 

 

20,110

 

 

 

88,332

 

 

 

 

486

 

 

 

22,224

 

73


Table of Contents

(18) Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The table below is a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for the beginning and the end of the period for all periods presented:

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

For the Period
February 3, 2021
through
December 31, 2021

 

 

 

For the Period
January 1, 2021
through
February 2, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

314,974

 

 

$

172,768

 

 

 

$

188,006

 

 

$

272,624

 

Restricted cash-current

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,751

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Restricted cash-non-current

 

 

79,561

 

 

 

80,179

 

 

 

 

80,178

 

 

 

2,764

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

$

394,535

 

 

$

269,698

 

 

 

$

268,184

 

 

$

275,388

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

258,999

 

 

$

314,974

 

 

 

$

172,768

 

 

$

188,006

 

Restricted cash-current

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

16,751

 

 

 

-

 

Restricted cash-non-current

 

 

80,108

 

 

 

79,561

 

 

 

 

80,179

 

 

 

80,178

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period

 

$

339,107

 

 

$

394,535

 

 

 

$

269,698

 

 

$

268,184

 

74


Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022 were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. See disclosure of a material weakness below under “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 based upon criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management determined that as of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the material weakness described below.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As of December 31, 2022, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as we did not design and maintain effective controls to review the reasonableness of assumptions determined by, and accuracy of calculations performed by, our external tax service providers. This material weakness resulted in an adjustment to deferred tax benefit and income tax benefit that was recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. Additionally, this material weakness could result in misstatements of income tax related balances that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements which would not be prevented or detected.

Remediation Plan for Material Weakness

In order to address the material weakness described above, management has implemented a remediation plan that includes implementing enhancements to our controls around reviewing the reasonableness of assumptions determined by, and the accuracy of calculations performed by, our external tax service providers.

75


Table of Contents

We believe the measures will remediate the material weakness and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control over financial reporting. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address the material weakness.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

ITEM 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

None

76


Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Board of Directors

Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement (defined below), our current Board of Directors consists of the following seven members:

Joseph Citarrella
Our boardDaniel E. Flores
Michael Y. McGovern
Brian K. Moore
Julie J. Robertson
Krishna Shivram
Timothy J. Winfrey

We currently have an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. All directors serve on each committee. The Board believes under NYSE listing standards (which we are not currently subject to), that all of the directors, (theexcept for Mr. Moore and Mr. McGovern, may be independent directors, provided that Mr. Citarrella and Mr. Flores may not be independent for Audit Committee purposes. The Board orconsiders Mr. Shivram to be an Audit Committee financial expert.

Joseph Citarrella, 36, is currently a Managing Principal for Monarch Alternative Capital LP (“Monarch”), a private investment firm. From 2008 to 2012,Mr. Citarrella was an Associate at Goldman Sachs in the Global Investment Research equity group covering the integrated oil, exploration and production, and refining sectors. From 2017 to 2018, Mr. Citarrella served as nonexecutive Chairman of the Board of Directors)Vanguard Natural Resources, Inc., a Houston based independent oil and gas company. From 2018 to 2019, Mr. Citarrella served as an independent director for Resolute Energy. Mr. Citarrella is responsible for oversighta designated director of our management, providing strategic direction and establishing broad corporate policies. In addition, our Board addresses the Company’s organizational needs, navigates competitive challenges, ensures succession and appropriately manages risks.

Set forth belowMonarch. Mr. Citarrella is biographical information regarding the current membersa valuable member of our board of directors (the Board orbecause of his extensive experience in the Board of Directors).
           
Name
 
Age
  
Director Since
  
Principal Occupation
David D. Dunlap
  
58
   
2010
  
Chief Executive Officer and President
James M. Funk
  
70
   
2005
  
President of J.M. Funk & Associates
Terence E. Hall
  
74
   
1995
  
Founder and Chairman of the Board
Peter D. Kinnear
  
73
   
2011
  
Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of FMC Technologies, Inc.
Janiece M. Longoria
  
67
   
2015
  
Former Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority
Michael M. McShane
  
66
   
2012
  
Advisor to Advent International
W. Matt Ralls
  
70
   
2012
  
Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Rowan Companies plc
David D. Dunlap
has served as our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since 2010 and President since 2011. From 2007 until he joined the Company in 2010, Mr. Dunlap served as Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer of BJ Services Company (BJ Services), a renowned well services provider. He joined BJ Services in 1984 as a District Engineer. Prior to 1995, he served as Vice President — Sales for the Coastal Division of North America and U.S. Sales and Marketing Manager for BJ Services. Prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Dunlap held the position of Vice President — International Division from 1995 to 2007. Mr. Dunlap currently serves as director and trustee on the boards of numerous
non-profit
organizations.
James M. Funk
is currently the President of J.M. Funk & Associates, an oil and gas business consulting firm,industry.

Daniel E. Flores, 52, is currently a Partner at GoldenTree Asset Management LP (“GoldenTree”), an employee-owned global asset management firm. Mr.Flores served as Senior Vice President of Avenue Capital Group from 2008 to 2013. Previously, Mr. Flores worked in the Restructuring and Finance Group at Lehman Brothers and as an analyst at Merrill Lynch. Mr. Flores is a designated director of GoldenTree. Mr. Flores is a valuable member of our board of directors because of his extensive experience in the financial industry.

Michael Y. McGovern, 71, is currently our Executive Chairman. Mr. McGovern also serves as a director of Cactus, Inc. and previously served as a director of Nuverra Environmental Services and ION Geophysical Corporation.Mr. McGovern has more than 40 years of experience in the energy industry. Dr. Funkindustry having served as Senior Vice President of Equitable Resources (now EQT Corporation)a director and President of Equitable Production Co. from June 2000 to 2003. He worked for 23 years with Shell Oil Companyan executive at multiple public and its affiliates andprivate companies. Mr. McGovern is a Certified Petroleum Geologist.

Mr. Funk has served on thevaluable member of our board of directors because of Rangehis extensive experience in the oil and gas industry.

Julie J. Robertson, 67, served as the Executive Chair of Noble Corporation and previously served as Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2018 until her retirement in May 2020. From 2001 to 2018, Ms. Robertson served in various other management roles for Noble Corporation and its subsidiaries. Ms. Robertson served continuously as Corporate Secretary of Noble Corporation from 1993 until assuming the Chair’s role in 2018 and served as Chair at the time of the filing by Noble Corporation and certain other debtors of voluntary petitions for reorganization pursuant to chapter 11 of the United States Code on July 31, 2020. Ms. Robertson resigned as Chair of Noble Corporation in 2021. Ms. Robertson is also Chair of the Board and Remuneration Committee of Seadrill Limited, a director of EOG Resources, Corporation since 2008.

Terence E. Hall
Inc. and a trustee of Spindletop Charities, Inc. In 2020, Ms. Robertson was elected the first female Chair of the International Association of Drilling Contractors. Ms. Robertson serves as the Chair of our Compensation Committee. Ms. Robertson is a designated director of GoldenTree. Ms. Robertson is a valuable member of our board of directors because of her extensive experience in the oil and gas industry.

Krishna Shivram, 60, has over 31 years of experience spread across financial and management positions in the oil and gas industry in the United States, Middle East, Europe and India. Mr. Shivram serves as a director of Allison Transmission Holdings Inc. and Ranger Energy Services Inc. He is also Managing Partner of Veritec Ventures LLC, a venture capital firm focused on making energy transition and climate tech investments. Mr. Shivram served as Chief Executive Officer of Sentinel Energy Services Inc. from 2017 to 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Shivram served as a director of Gulfmark Offshore from 2017 to 2018 and held executive positions, including CFO and interim CEO at Weatherford International Plc and VP Treasurer at Schlumberger Limited. Mr. Shivram serves as the Chairman of our Board since 1995.Audit Committee.

Timothy J. Winfrey, 62, is currently a Senior Advisor to LeBaronBrown Industries LLC, an investment organization designed to support the long-termgrowth of industry-leading operating businesses. Mr. Hall is the founder of the Company andWinfrey served as CEOVice President - Energy Systems and Controls of the Company and its predecessors from 1980 until 2010.

Peter D. Kinnear
held numerous management, operations and marketing roles with FMCRoper Technologies Inc. (FTI) and FMC Corporation from 1971 until his retirement in 2011. Mr. Kinnear served as FTI’s CEO from 2007 to 2011, Chairman of the Board from 2008 to 2011, President from 2006 to 2010 and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007.
Janiece M. Longoria
is the Former Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority. She currently serves as Vice Chairman of the University of Texas System Board of Regents, and on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Houston Branch. Formerly, Ms. Longoria practiced law as a securities and commercial litigator for 23 years at Ogden Gibson Broocks Longoria & Hall LLP, and previously at Andrews & Kurth LLP.
Michael M. McShane
serves as an Advisor to Advent International, a global private equity fund. Mr. McShane served as a director, President and CEO of Grant Prideco, Inc. from 2002 until the completion of its merger with National Oilwell Varco, Inc. in 2008, having alsoto 2015. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Winfrey served as the chairman of its board from 2003 to 2008.

Table of Contents
Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. McShane was Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer and a director of BJ Services from 1990 to 2002 and Vice President — Finance from 1987 to 1990 when BJ Services was a division of Baker Hughes Incorporated.
Mr. McShane has served on the board of directors of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. since 2012, where he has served as chairman of the board of directors since 2017. He has also served on the board of directors of Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Oasis Petroleum, Inc. since 2010.
W. Matt Ralls
previously served as Executive Chairman, CEO and President of Rowan Companies plc (Rowan) from 2014 to 2016, the CEO from 2009 until 2014,Ingersoll-Rand Company's Commercial and President from 2009 to 2013. Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of GlobalSantaFe Corporation from 2005 until the completion of the merger of GlobalSantaFe with Transocean, Inc. in 2007,Retail Air Solutions business, prior to which he had served as Seniorwas Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001general manager of Ingersoll-Rand's Reciprocating Compressor division. Prior to 2005.
that, Mr. Ralls has served as chairmanWinfrey held various corporate development and general management positions with Owens Corning, Eaton Corporation and British Petroleum Company Plc. Mr. Winfrey is a valuable member of theour board of directors because of Pacific Drilling S.A.his extensive experience as a senior executive in the industrial engineering industry.

Brian K. Moore, 66, is currently our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors since 2018. HeJanuary 2022. Mr. Moore has alsopreviously served on theas our Executive Vice President of Corporate Services from April 2016 to January 2022, and as our Senior Executive Vice

77


Table of Contents

President of North America Services from February 2012 to March 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Moore held executive positions at Complete Production Services and Integrated Production Services. Mr. Moore is a valuable member of our board of directors because of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. since 2017his extensive experience as a senior executive in the oil field service industry.

The Company has entered into a stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”) to provide for certain governance matters. Other than obligations related to Confidential Information (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement), the rights and Cabot Oilpreferences of each stockholder under the Stockholders Agreement will terminate when such stockholder ceases to own shares of the Class A Common Stock and Gas Corporation since 2011.

Meeting Attendance
OurClass B Common Stock. While the initial Board has adopted a policy that recommends all directors personally attend each Annual Meeting. All of our directors attended our 2019 Annual Meeting.
In 2019, our Board held 7 meetings,Directors designees post-emergence were appointed by GoldenTree, Monarch, and the committees held a totalad hoc noteholders, going forward, pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, the Board of 12 meetings. EachDirectors consists of ourseven directors, attended at least 75% of our Board meetings and the meetings of any committees of which the director was a member in 2019.whom:

(i)
two are designated by GoldenTree (subject to certain ownership thresholds);
(ii)
Director Independence
one is designated by Monarch (subject to certain ownership thresholds);
(iii)
Our Board has determined that each of Messrs. Funk, Kinnear, McShaneone is the Chief Executive Officer; and Ralls and Ms. Longoria
(iv)
three are “independent directors” as definedelected by the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) listing standards.stockholders.

Furthermore, the Board of Directors is given special governance rights in the Stockholders Agreement, including approval rights over certain corporate and other transactions, such as (i) any merger, consolidation, reorganization (including conversion) or any other business combination, (ii) certain acquisitions or dispositions of assets or liabilities, (iii) incurrence of indebtedness (subject to certain monetary thresholds), and (iv) issuances of equity, subject to the limitations therein, among other actions.

The Stockholders Agreement also provides the stockholders certain preemptive rights, drag-along rights, tag-along rights, and registration rights, subject, in each case, to the terms and conditions identified in the Stockholders Agreement.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is certain information regarding our current executive officers, as of June 1, 2020, including all offices and positions held by each in the past five years.

Name

Age

Offices Held and Term of Office

David D. Dunlap

Michael Y. McGovern (1)

71

58

Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 2021

Brian K. Moore

66

President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2011

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
48
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, since March 2018
Executive Vice President of International Services, from February 2012 to February 2018
James W. Spexarth
52
Chief Accounting Officer, since March 2018
Vice President and Corporate Controller, from August 2013 to February 2018
A. Patrick Bernard
62
Executive Vice President, since April 2016
Senior Executive Vice President, from July 2006 to March 2016
Brian K. Moore
63
January 2022, Executive Vice President of Corporate Services sincefrom April 2016
to January 2022, Senior Executive Vice President of North America Services from February 2012 to March 2016

William B. Masters

James W. Spexarth

55

63

Executive Vice President and General Counsel,Chief Financial Officer since August 2021, Interim Chief Financial Officer from March 2021 to August 2021, Chief Accounting Officer since March 2008

2018, Vice President and Corporate Controller from August 2013 to February 2018

(1)
For additional information regarding Mr. McGovern’s employment for the past five years, please refer to the section titled Board of Directors above.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our current directors or executive officers.

2

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers to file with the SEC reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Based solely upon our review of the Forms 3 and 4 filed during 2019 and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that all required reports were timely filed during 2019.
Board Committees
Each of our Board’s standing committees has adopted a written charter that has been approved by our Board. Copies of these charters, as well as copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, are available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.superiorenergy.com and are available in print upon request to our Secretary at Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002.
Our Board has affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to audit and compensation committees) set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.
The table below shows the committees on which each of our directors sits and the number of committee meetings held by each committee in 2019.
             
Name
 
Audit Committee
  
Compensation Committee
  
Corporate Governance
Committee
 
James M. Funk
     
M
   
M
 
Peter D. Kinnear
  
M*
      
M
 
Janiece M. Longoria
  
M  
      
C
 
Michael M. McShane
  
C*
   
M
    
W. Matt Ralls
     
C
   
M
 
             
Meetings held in 2019
  
6  
   
3
   
3
 
*Audit committee financial expert
(C)Committee chair
(M)Committee member
Audit Committee
Our Board has a standing audit committee (Audit Committee), the members of which are Messrs. McShane and Kinnear and Ms. Longoria. The Audit Committee is comprised of three
non-employee
directors, each of whom meet the independence and financial literacy requirements under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, including the heightened NYSE independence requirements for Audit Committee members and two of whom qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Mr. McShane serves as committee chair of the Audit Committee.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee (Compensation Committee) consists of three members of the Board of Directors, Messrs. Funk, McShane and Ralls, all of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent under the NYSE listing standards. In addition, each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a
“non-employee”
director within the meaning of Rule
16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Mr. Ralls serves as committee chair of the Compensation Committee.
Since May 2007, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer), an independent compensation consultant, to advise the Compensation Committee on matters relating to executive compensation and assist it in maintaining and administering our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee annually requests Pearl Meyer to conduct an executive compensation review to evaluate the compensation of our senior executives relative to an industry peer group selected by the Compensation Committee with input from
3

the compensation consultant and management and published market survey data. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How We Make Compensation Decisions—Compensation Consultant’s Role” herein for more information.
Our stock incentive plan permits the Compensation Committee to delegate to appropriate personnel its authority to make awards to employees other than officers and directors subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to our CEO to make or alter awards under our long-term incentive (LTI) plan to participants (other than himself), subject to the following conditions:
the CEO may grant awards relating to no more than 100,000 shares of our common stock in any fiscal year and awards relating to no more than 20,000 shares to any one participant;
the CEO may grant no more than 30,000 performance share units (PSUs) in any fiscal year and no more than 5,000 PSUs to any one participant;
the CEO may cancel, modify or waive rights under awards related to no more than 20,000 shares and 5,000 PSUs held by a participant;
the CEO must approve the grant in writing during an open window period, with the grant date being the date of the written approval or a future date; and
the CEO must report the grants, cancellations or alterations to the Compensation Committee at its next meeting.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2019, none of Messrs. Funk, McShane or Ralls, who comprised the Compensation Committee, were officers or employees of the Company or any of our subsidiaries or had any relationships requiring disclosure in this Amendment under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Certain Transactions,” and none of our executive officers served as a member of the Compensation Committee of another entity or as a director of another entity whose executive officers served on our Board or the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee is a former officer of the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee (Corporate Governance Committee) consists of four members of the Board, Messrs. Funk, Kinnear, and Ralls and Ms. Longoria, all of whom meet the independence requirement under the NYSE listing standards. Ms. Longoria serves as committee chair of the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts assessments of nominees to our Board and is charged with developing and recommending to our Board any policies, Corporate Governance Principles and the structure, leadership and membership of our Board committees, including those policies and principles related to, affecting or concerning risk oversight of our Board and its committees.

Code of Conduct

Our Shared Core Values at Work (Code of Conduct) applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. This Code of Conduct is publicly available on the Corporate Governance page in the About Us section of our website at http://www.superiorenergy.com. Any waivers granted to directors or executive officers and any material amendment to our Code of Conduct will be posted promptly on our website and/or disclosed in a current report on Form

8-K.
Procedures for Stockholder Recommendations We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of Nominees to the Boardsuch code of Directors
There were no material changes to the procedures described in the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders by which security holdersethics. The request may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors.
4

be made via mail to: Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002.

Item 11. Executive

Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)(“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation philosophy and practices. practices applicable to named executive officers’ compensation for 2022. For 2022, our named executive officers (“NEOs”) were:

78


Table of Contents

 Name

 Offices Held

 Michael Y. McGovern

 Executive Chairman, Interim Chief Executive Officer until January 20, 2022

 Brian K. Moore

 President, Chief Executive Officer

 James W. Spexarth

 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 Michael J. Delahoussaye

 President, Workstrings International

 Bryan M. Ellis

 President, Wild Well Control, International Snubbing Services, and International Production Services

 Deidre D. Toups

 President, Stabil Drill, Superior Completion Services, and HB Rentals

On January 20, 2022, Brian K. Moore, our former Executive Vice President, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and a member of the Board in accordance with the Stockholders’ Agreement. As a result of Mr. Moore’s appointment, Mr. McGovern no longer performs the functions of our principal executive officer but remains with us as Executive Chairman of the Board.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

The Compensation Committee reviews recommendations by our CEO and makesof the final determination regarding executive compensation.

Executive Compensation Philosophy
The Compensation CommitteeBoard (the “Compensation Committee”) is responsible for designing, implementing and administering our executive compensation program. The primary objective of ourthat program is to:
ensure that pay and performance are directly linked so that executive compensation is aligned with the Company’s operating and financial performance, including its stock price performance; and
ensure that we canto attract and retain talented executives with the skills, educational background, experience and personal qualities needed to successfully manage our business.
In structuring our executive compensation program, thekey personnel. Our Compensation Committee is guided by several key principles to leverage the following principles:Company’s ability to motivate key talent. Our Compensation Committee believes compensation should:

Be performance driven
Be competitive with a comparable peer group and responsive to a rapidly changing landscape
Balance short term and long-term objectives
Focus on the retention of high performing executives
Support our business strategies and initiatives

Compensation should bePractices in 2022

The CEO developed recommendations for compensation practices in 2022 that were subject to Compensation Committee approval. The CEO’s recommendations are based on his evaluations of the performance drivenof the executives and incentiveare based on several factors, including individual performance, business results, and general market information. The Compensation Committee on its own reviews the performance and compensation should compriseof the largest part of an executive’s compensation package.

The largest portion of our target executive compensation (88% for our CEO and 80% for the other named executive officers (NEOs)) is comprisedapproves his level of LTI awards and annual incentive plan (AIP) participation levels that are
at-risk,
performance-basedcompensation.

In 2022, compensation practices were aligned with the ultimate value primarily determined by both our absoluteCompany to address a number of realities, including:

Comprehensive initiative to transform the company with significant associated restructuring efforts
Need to retain key staff to facilitate numerous divestitures and relative stock price performance.related asset sales
Rising market pay across energy service sector and inflationary pressures
Base salary, the only fixed element of compensation in our executive compensation program, accounts for approximately 12% of our CEO’s target compensation and approximately 20% of our other NEOs’ target compensation.
Compensation levels should be competitive in order to attract and retain talented executives.
We annually receive extensive input from our independent compensation consultant regarding the competitiveness of our pay strategy relative to the market. We have a well-defined, established process to evaluate the competitiveness of our executive compensation program.
Incentive compensation should balance short-term and long-term performance, including balancing short-term growth with long-term returns.
Our AIP rewards executives for the achievement of annual goals based on our profitability and achievement of quantitative operational metrics.
The value received by ourlack of publicly traded equity to use as compensation currency
The need to stabilize and align the executive management team subsequent to initial post-emergence MIP grants and the appointment of a CEO in January 2022 through long term incentive awards
Engagement of Evercore as financial advisor regarding potential strategic alternatives, including transformational merger or divestiture transactions

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews and other NEOs from LTI grants is alignedconsiders the effectiveness of the Company’s existing compensation programs and modifies such programs or develops new programs to better effectuate the Compensation Committee’s compensation objectives. In addition, the Compensation Committee annually evaluates with our actual operational and financial performance, including both our absolute and relative stock price performance.

In order to encourage our executives to prudently manage our business without sacrificing long-term returns, the performance metrics used for our PSUs are our
3-year
relative total stockholder return (TSR) and return on assets (ROA) as compared to our peers.
We evaluate annually with ourits independent compensation consultant whether the program is balanced in terms of base pay and incentives, both short-term and long-term.
5

In 2022, the Compensation programs should provide an element of retention and motivate executives to stay with theCommittee engaged Lyons, Benenson & Company long-term.

Executives forfeit their opportunity to earn a payout of their PSUs if they voluntarily leave the Company before the
3-year
performance cycle is complete, except in the case of retirement. Also, the use of time-vested stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) provides a strong incentive for executives to stay with the Company.
The retirement benefits provided under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) increase the longer the executive remains with the Company.
Compensation programs should encourage executives to own Company stock in order to align their interests with our stockholders.
Our stock ownership guidelines require our executive officers to own shares of Company stock equivalent to a stated multiple of the executive’s base salary. The multiple varies depending on the executive’s job title. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation Policies—Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirement” for more information.
We grant time-vested RSUsInc. (“LB&Co”) as one of our LTI grants, and we may also elect to pay up to 50% of the value of our PSUs in common stock.
Executive Summary of Our Compensation Practices
We maintain compensation practices that are aligned with sustainable corporate governance principles. Below, we highlight key elements of our compensation governance.
We pay for performance.
With the exception of salary and benefits, all of ourits independent executive compensation elements are incentive-based or tied to Company stock performance. Performance-based,
at-risk
pay constitutes 88%% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and 80% of our other NEOs target total direct compensation.
We structure each element of compensation withconsultant, as it did in 2021. LB&Co is a specific purpose.
Our process for making compensation decisions involves a strategic review of the role and the level of each compensation element, as well as the balance of short-term and long-term incentive compensation
We have “double trigger” change of control provisions.
The change of control program for our executives provides for change of control cash severance payments only if a qualifying termination of employment occurs in connection with the change of control. In addition, double trigger change of control provisions apply to all of our executive LTI awards.
We review our equity plan share usage regularly.
On at least an annual basis, we review and evaluate our share dilution, burn rate and overhang levels of our LTI program and its impact on stockholder dilution.
We consider the views of our stockholders.
We conduct an annual
say-on-pay
advisory vote and take into account the results of that vote. We also have a stockholder engagement program and are interested in stockholder feedback regarding our executive compensation program.
We have strong anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.
We prohibit our executive officers and directors from hedging and pledging Company securities.
We have a broad-based LTI program.
We grant LTI awards broadly to
non-executive
management employees within the Company in an effort to promote stock ownership and alignment with our stockholders’ interests.
6

We have a claw back policy.
Our AIP and LTI awards reflect our claw back policy, which applies to all of our executive officers and provide for the forfeiture of these awards or the return of any related gain in the event of a financial statement restatement.
We do not provide any excise tax gross-ups.
We do not provide excise tax
gross-ups
in any executive employment agreement or severance or change of control program.
We have robust stock ownership guidelines.
Our CEO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 6x his base salary, our CFO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 3x his base salary and our other executive officers are required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 2x their respective base salary.
We have a minimum holding requirement.
Our executive stock ownership guidelines require executives to maintain ownership of at least 50% of the net
after-tax
shares they acquire pursuant to any LTI awards, unless they have met the required ownership level.
We engage anleading independent compensation consulting firm.
Our independentfirm that advises and counsels boards of directors and their compensation consultant provides information and advice regarding compensation philosophy objectives and strategy, including trends and regulatory and governance considerationscommittees on matters related to executive compensation. Our consultant does not provide any other advisory or consulting servicescompensation, board compensation and corporate governance. They work collaboratively with directors and top management to the Company.
We annually review tally sheets.
We annually review tally sheets summarizing all of thedevelop compensation elements of our executive officers.
Determining Form and Amount of Compensation
Role of Management in Setting Compensation.
Our CEO recommends the compensation of our executive officers, other than himself. Each year, the CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding salary adjustments, AIP payout multiples and LTI grants for our other executive officers. In formulating his recommendations, the CEO considers various factors, including his subjective analysissolutions that are supportive of each executive’s performanceclient's goals, objectives and contributions tolong-term plans.

LB&Co advises the Company, the performance of business units under his or her direct supervision (if applicable to the particular officer), experience level, tenure in position, the average base pay level for similar positions and the Company’s overall performance. Although the Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations with respect to other executive officers, the Committee makes all final determinations regarding executive compensation, including determining our CEO’s compensation.

Compensation Consultant’s Role.
Pearl Meyer advises the Committee on executive compensation matters and assists in developing and implementing our executive compensation program. As required by SECLB&Co also informs the Compensation Committee on current trends to ensure the Compensation Committee is aware of evolving market conditions.

79


Table of Contents

Brian K. Moore, who served as a member of the Compensation Committee in 2022 was an officer or employee of the Company, and NYSE rules,Michael Y. McGovern, who served as a member of our Compensation Committee in 2022 served as interim Chief Executive Officer for part of 2022 and is currently the Committee has assessedCompany’s Executive Chairman.

None of our executive officers serves or served during the independence of Pearl Meyer and concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest duringlast completed fiscal year 2019. In making this determination, the Committee noted that during 2019:

Pearl Meyer provided advisory services related solely to executive andas a director compensation;
Fees from the Company represented less than 1% of Pearl Meyer’s total revenue;
Pearl Meyer maintains a conflicts policy to prevent a conflict of interest or any other independence issues;
Nonemember of the team assignedcompensation committee of another organization one of whose executive officers serves or served at the same time as a member of either the Board or the Compensation Committee.

In 2022, LB&Co was directed to compile an analysis of compensation for our key executives. Included in this analysis was a review of our “Peer Group”. In establishing the Peer Group, the Compensation Committee sought to include companies in similar industries, with applicable revenue scope, similar business characteristics and adequate executive compensation disclosures. For 2022, the Peer Group was made up of the following companies for comparison:

Expro Group Holdings N.V.
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Newpark Resources, Inc.
Oceaneering International, Inc.
Oil States International, Inc.
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
ProFrac Holding Corp.
ProPetro Holding Corp.
RPC, Inc.
Select Energy Services, Inc.
Weatherford International plc

Competitive data was drawn from both the Peer Group and publicly available survey data in order to analyze where the Company’s compensation stands relative to the Company had any business or personal relationship with members of the Committee outside of the engagement;

None of the team assigned to the Company had any business or personal relationship with any Company executive officer outside of the engagement; and
None of the team assigned to the Company maintained any individual position in our common stock.
7

Peer Groups, Annual Benchmarking Process and Survey Data.
The Committee evaluates the Company’s executive compensation practices and financial performance by reference to two different peer groups as described below, the Performance Peer Group (Performance Peer Group) and the Compensation Peer Group (Compensation Peer Group). The Performance Peer Group is comprised of oilfield service companies which were chosen due to similarity of services provided, operating footprint, business focus, capital structure and competitive conditions. The Compensation Peer Group is a group of companies which would be considered peers for executive talent purposes. This second group is more similar to the Companymarket in terms of sizebase salary, short-term and scope of operations, although, duelong-term incentive targets and the resulting total estimated direct compensation (“TEDC”). Relative to the limited number of companies directly similar in size, we include companies that are both somewhat smaller and larger than the Company. Additionally, we have excluded certain Performance Peer Group companies from the Compensation Peer Group because of dissimilarity in pay approach and structures. The Committee annually reviews the companies comprising each peer group and revises each group as it deems appropriate after consultation with Pearl Meyer.
Our 2019 Performanceanalyses by position, all of Superior’s executives’ TEDC register at or below the median for the Peer Group and generally within the range of competitive practice. Target pay may vary from the median based on the executive’s industry experience, company experience and performance in his or her role, internal pay equity among our executives and other factors the Compensation Peer Group includedCommittee considers relevant, for example the following companies:
Performance Peer Group*
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
C&J Energy Services, Ltd.
Halliburton Co.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Key Energy Services, Inc.
Nabors Industries Ltd.
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
Oil States International, Inc.
Patterson-UTI
Energy, Inc.
RPC, Inc.
Schlumberger Ltd.
Weatherford International plc
*
Reference group for the PSUs grantedlack of liquidity in 2019
Compensation Peer Group
Baker Hughes, a GE Company
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Ensco plc
Forum Energy Technologies
Halliburton Co.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Key Energy Services, Inc.
Nabors Industries Ltd.
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
Oceaneering International, Inc.
Oil States International, Inc.
Patterson-UTI
Energy, Inc.
RPC, Inc.
Weatherford International plc 
The Compensation Peer Group set forth above had a trailing twelve-month median revenue of $2.05 billion as of December 31, 2019. We had revenue of $1.4 billion for the same period.
At the Committee’s request, Pearl Meyer conducts an annual executive compensation review to benchmark the Company’s senior executive compensation relative toClass B common stock. Overall, the Compensation Peer Group with supplemental data from published market surveys. The Committee uses this report to evaluate whetherbelieves the executive compensation levels, including base salary and actual incentive payouts, are within industry norms andprogram of the Company’s stated strategy.
Pearl Meyer supplements data from the Compensation Peer Group with broad-based compensation survey dataexecutives to develop a comprehensive viewbe competitive.

The Change of Control Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) was terminated in favor of individual employment agreements for 2022 in consideration of the competitive market data. We believe using survey data is an important elementcurrent size of ourthe Company, the number of participants in the Severance Plan, and to further shareholder value. The former participants in the Severance Plan waived their right to receive any payments or benefits under the Severance Plan.

Components of Executive Compensation

During 2022, the issuance of equity based compensation evaluation. Compensation survey data includes companies from the broader energy industry that influence the competitive market for executive talent. In addition, the survey data also includes data from companies that are comparableand new employment agreements continued to us in terms of size and scale.

Review of Tally Sheets
. We annually review and evaluate an executive tally sheet that contains a listing and quantification (as appropriate) of each component ofevolve our executive compensation program for our executive officers, including special executive benefits and perquisites, as well as accumulated values (e.g., stock option holdings) and other contingent compensation such as severance arrangements. We believe that our balance of annual and long-term compensation elements, our mix ofin a multi-step process. The initial post-emergence long-term incentive vehiclesawards in 2021 were to candidates who were heavily engaged in the stabilization and ourtransition of the Company from bankruptcy. The 2022 awards, in conjunction with new employment agreements, identified the future executive leadership, including the CEO, CFO and business unit leaders, of the Company and were intended to provide stability for the organization and alignment with the transformation initiatives and performance objectives for 2022.

The 2022 equity-based compensation program is designed to provide alignment with the executive team and shareholders and is based on key considerations, including:

Multi-year award over a three year period in lieu of customary annual awards
20% (other than Mr. McGovern) came in the form of restricted stock ownership guidelines resultunits (“RSUs”) vesting ratably over three years.
80% (other than Mr. McGovern) came in a
8the form of performance stock units (“PSUs”).

80


Table of Contents

o
The PSUs are subject to termination and forfeiture for no consideration in the event no strategic transaction occurs prior to March 23, 2025, as further specified in the applicable form of PSU award agreement.
o
compensation programThe PSUs vest only upon transactions that aligns our executives’ interestsachieve share price hurdles as measured in connection with thosethe consummation of our stockholders and does not encourage our management to take unreasonable risks relating to our business. specified transactions.

The variousthree main components of ourthe executive compensation program are described in detail below.

Components of Executive Compensation
The main components of our executive compensation program arefor 2022 were base salary, AIP and LTI grants. Our executives also participate in our SERP. Overall, the primary emphasis of our executive compensation program is to provide a high level of variable
at-risk
performance-based compensation, linking executive pay with our operational and financial performance, including our stock price performance. As an executive’s level of responsibility increases, a greater portion of total compensation is
at-risk,
creating the potential for greater variability in the individual’s compensation from year to year.
As reflected in the charts set forth above, our CEO’s component mix is very heavily weighted towards long-term performance and reflects our view that his role in setting the Company’s strategic direction gives him greater influence on the ultimate performance levels achieved. We also believe that our emphasis on variable pay and balancing short-termannual incentive plan (“AIP”) awards, and long-term performance is appropriate for a company competing in a highly competitive and cyclical industry.
incentive awards under the MIP (as defined below).

Base Salary

The primary role of the base salary element of ourthe executive compensation program isduring 2022 was to compensate executives for the experience, education, personal qualities and other qualifications that arewere key for their specific role within the Company. In establishingroles as well as their level of responsibility. The Compensation Committee monitors and adjusts salaries for our NEOs over time as necessary to remain competitive with the base salaries of executive officers of members of our Peer Group. For additional salary information, see the 2022 Summary Compensation Table below.

On March 28, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved employment agreements for our executives, we have historically targetedeach of Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye and Ms. Toups, which superseded and replaced their existing employment agreements with the median salaries of similarly-situated executivesCompany, except for Mr. Delahoussaye who was not a party to an employment agreement with the Company, and in ourMr. Moore’s case also superseded his binding term sheet with the Company disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2022. The new employment agreements were deemed appropriate by the Compensation Peer GroupCommittee due to marketplace compensation trends, the Company’s strategic positioning and striveplans, and to setaccount for each NEO's experience in their current role and to provide equitable compensation relationships among internal peers.

Below is more information on each NEO’s base salary:

Name

 

2021 Base Salary at December 31, 2021

 

 

2022 Base Salary

 

Mr. McGovern

 

$

1,203,904

 

 

$

750,000

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

750,000

 

Mr. Spexarth

 

 

425,000

 

 

 

425,000

 

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

375,000

 

Mr. Ellis

 

 

260,000

 

 

 

325,000

 

Ms. Toups

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

350,000

 

Mr. McGovern was paid $1,203,904 in 2021 for his services as Chairman and principal executive officer. Mr. Moore’s annual base salary was increased from $450,000 to $750,000 in 2022 given his promotion to, and increased responsibility as, CEO.

The base salaries at consistent levels for each of Messrs. Spexarth and Delahoussaye and Ms. Toups remained the same in 2022 as in 2021 given their respective positions and roles remained unchanged. On July 18, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved an employment agreement for Mr. Ellis. In connection therewith and as a result of his promotion, Mr. Ellis’ salary was increased from $260,000 to $325,000.

On July 18, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved an executive chairman agreement for Michael Y. McGovern, the Company’s Executive Chairman (the “Executive Chairman Agreement”). The Executive Chairman Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $750,000. Mr. McGovern’s annual base salary is subject to adjustment (upward or downward) if Mr. McGovern’s duties or commitments change during the term of the Executive Chairman Agreement. In addition, Mr. McGovern’s Executive Chairman Agreement provided for a cash lump sum payment in an amount equal to $288,306 to account for the annual base salary Mr. McGovern would have been paid since assuming the position of Executive Chairman until the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement, less any payments received from the Company since assuming the position of Executive Chairman until the effective date. Mr. McGovern’s base salary recognizes his executive seniority and tenure and the Company’s efforts to retain talent necessary for success.

The target AIP opportunity for each NEO is 70% of base salary, with similar responsibilities.

AIP
the exception of Mr. Moore, for which it is 100% and Mr. McGovern, who does not participate in the AIP.

2022 Executive Annual Incentive Plan

81


Table of Contents

The purpose of the AIP is to reward executives for achievement of annual financial and operational objectives. Furthermore, the AIP is part of a comprehensive compensation program that aligns pay to performance by making a substantial portion of total executive compensation variable, or “at-risk.”

Although the Compensation Committee sets annual incentive target levels that result in mediantarget-level payouts when performance objectives are met (subject to the target annual incentive award opportunity provided for in Messrs. Moore’s and Spexarth’s employment agreements), our program provides executives withmay pay out below or above target, contingent upon the opportunityCompany’s performance relative to earn higher payments dependingthe Compensation Committee and Board approved goals, which are set annually based on our operating plan.

At the extent to which thesebeginning of each year, our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending for approval by our Board quantifiable corporate performance objectives are achieved or exceeded.

and the relative weighting of those metrics. At the end of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s performance results against these objectives. The 2022 AIP Parametersawards were approved by the Compensation Committee in March 2023 based upon metrics set at the beginning of 2022.

AIP Performance Goals for 2019

Executives

Under the AIP, our NEOs (other than Mr. McGovern) are eligible to earn a payout based on a target percentage of their base salary. We believed it was important, both for morale and competitive reasons, to incentivize performance by maintaining the same 2018 potential AIP payout target opportunity for our CEO and for our other NEOs. Given the decline in activity in the oil and gas industry, wethe Compensation Committee also established what weit believed was an aggressiveappropriate EBITDA target of $300 million. We believed that this challenging$162.0 million for 2022 given the evolving market landscape. This performance goal wouldwas designed to help achieve thea balance we seek between stockholder returns and executive compensation.

Ourcompensation and tie a significant portion of compensation directly to our operating and financial performance.

The AIP is designed to focus management’s attention on key financial and operational metrics that drive our performance, which are weighted as follows:

75%performance.

For 2022, 100% of the total payout isof the AIP was based on the achievement of the foregoing EBITDA target, and 25% of the totalmaximum payout is based onto each eligible NEO (other than Mr. Moore) under the Committee’s assessment of our achievement of key quantitative operational metrics. The overall incentive payout ranges from 0% toAIP was capped at 140% and at 200% of each NEO’s target award opportunity based on these factors, and is subject to being reduced by up to 15% based onfor Mr. Moore.

As noted previously, the Committee’s evaluation of our safety performance.

Financial Metric
TheCompensation Committee again determined to use EBITDA as the primary financial metric for the 2019 AIP. As a financial metric, EBITDA is closely linked to cash flow and encourages management to focus on improving efficiency from existing operations. The financial metric portion of the AIP provides for threshold, target and maximum payout levels, as a percentage of salary, based upon the achievement of 50%, 100% and 200% of the EBITDA target. Based on the business outlook at the time, the Committee set the EBITDA target for the 2019 AIP at $300 million, with the maximum being established at an unattainable level of $450 million.
9

Operational Metrics
With respect to operational metrics, the Committee established four key 2019 objectives: closely manage our general and administrative costs (G&A), days sales outstanding (DSO) and days payable outstanding (DPO) and generate free cash flow. The payout levels with respect to this portion of the AIP is determined based on below target, at target and above target achievements.
Safety Component
As in prior years, the Committee could reduce the ultimate payout to each executive by up to 15% based on its assessment of the Company’s performance relative to various safety metrics and a grading system that makes up the executive team safety scorecard. The 2019 safety scorecard contained three results-oriented metrics that measure the number of safety incidents and five leading indicators that were designed to encourage behavior by the Company’s employees in order to decrease the number of safety incidents.

The possible total award payout levels for 2019,2022, stated as a percentage of the officer’seach NEO’s base salary, are set forth in the table below.

             
Named Executive Officer
 
Minimum
  
Target
  
Maximum
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
75
%  
150
%  
300
%
Mr. Ballard
  
50
%  
100
%  
200
%
Mr. Moore
  
47.5
%  
95
%  
190
%
Mr. Bernard
  
45
%  
90
%  
180
%
Mr. Masters
  
45
%  
90
%  
180
%
Determination As Executive Chairman, Mr. McGovern does not participate in the AIP.

NEO

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

Mr. McGovern

 

0%

 

0%

 

0%

Mr. Moore

 

20%

 

100%

 

200%

Mr. Spexarth

 

14%

 

70%

 

140%

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

14%

 

70%

 

140%

Mr. Ellis

 

14%

 

70%

 

140%

Ms. Toups

 

14%

 

70%

 

140%

Based on the Company’s EBITDA results all NEOs, including the CEO, received the maximum bonus available under the AIP for 2022, which was paid in 2023.

Retention Bonus

In March 2022, Mr. Ellis was granted a $182,000 retention bonus pursuant to a long-term cash incentive award agreement, which provides for payment of 2019 Results

Thethe retention bonus in three substantially equal installments in March 2022, 2023 and 2024, subject to Mr. Ellis’ continued employment with the Company through each applicable payment date. Mr. Ellis was paid the first installment in an amount equal to $60,667 in March 2022.

Management Incentive Plan

On June 1, 2021, the Board and the Compensation Committee reviewedapproved and adopted our Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”). The purpose of the Company’s financial results for 2019MIP is to provide a means through which the Company and evaluated management’s effortsits affiliates may attract and accomplishmentsretain key personnel and to provide a means whereby directors, officers and employees (and prospective directors, officers and employees) can acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the value

82


Table of Contents

of a share of common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and its affiliates and aligning their interests with those of our stockholders.

Pursuant to the MIP, the Compensation Committee may grant awards with respect to up to 1,999,869 shares of our Class B common stock.

2022 Management Incentive Plan Awards

On March 28, 2022, the key operational objectives.Board and the Compensation Committee approved new forms of RSU award agreements and forms of PSU award agreements under the MIP. On July 18, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved an RSU award agreement under the MIP for Mr. McGovern and granted RSUs and PSUs to Mr. Ellis in connection with his promotion pursuant to the forms of award agreements.

The RSUs provide the right to receive a share of Class B common stock of the Company, subject to a service-based vesting requirement. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments over a three-year period, subject to earlier vesting upon certain transactions and, generally, continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The PSUs provide the right to receive a share of Class B common stock of the Company, subject to performance-based vesting requirements, as well as a service-based vesting requirement. Subject to an NEOs continued employment through the applicable vesting date, NEOs can earn 25% to 100% of the target PSU award based generally on achievement of share price hurdles set forth in the PSU award agreements following the completion of certain specified corporate transactions that occur prior to March 23, 2025. If such vesting conditions do not occur prior to such date, the PSUs will terminate and be forfeited for no consideration. As of December 31, 2022, no such specified corporate transactions had occurred. Accordingly, none of the PSUs granted pursuant to the PSU award agreements are vested. On November 16, 2022, in connection with its declaration of a special cash dividend of $12.45 per share of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock (collectively, the “Common Stock”), the share price hurdles provided in the PSU award agreements were proportionally adjusted downward pursuant to the terms of the award agreements.

The mix of equity awards for 2022 was driven by several factors, including U.S. tax consequences and an effort to encourage appropriate risk taking but discourage excessive risk taking. RSUs are widely used in the energy industry to strengthen the link between stockholder and employee interests, while supporting long-term retention goals and encouraging executives to build and maintain meaningful levels of ownership in the Company. The RSUs align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by delivering payouts in the form of Class B common stock of the Company, subject generally to the NEOs’ continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date.

Mr. McGovern received 100% of his long-term incentive awards in the form of RSUs and was not granted PSUs in recognition of the responsibility inherent in his role as Executive Chairman. In addition, in connection entering into the Executive Chairman Agreement, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved accelerated vesting with respect to 15,642 outstanding restricted shares of our Class B common stock granted to Mr. McGovern pursuant to a restricted stock award agreement, dated June 1, 2021, by and between us and Mr. McGovern. The RSU grant to Mr. McGovern and accelerated vesting of his restricted stock award align Mr. McGovern’s interests with those of the shareholders through the ownership of equity.

PSUs help encourage and reward the creation of long-term value for the financial metric, the Company achieved approximately 81.9%by aligning leadership’s incentives with those of the EBITDA target. The key operational objectives focused on growingshareholders, given the Company’s cash balance, reducing its capital expenditures and divesting

non-core
assets. As a result of management’s effortsPSU vesting schedule is subject to, in 2019, we were able to reduce capital expenditures by 37%, increase our cash balance by 72% compared to 2018 and divest
non-core
assets resulting in cash proceeds of $110 million in 2019. In January of 2020, we received the remaining payment of $24 million relating to an asset sale which occurred during the fourth quarter of 2019. Dueaddition to the Company’s EBITDA performance compared toNEOs’ continued employment through the target amount and the level ofapplicable vesting date, achievement of the key operational objectives, the Committee determined it was appropriate to approve an overall payout at 72.9% of target. In the Committee’s assessment of these operational objectives and determining the appropriate payout, we noted the following achievements:
Closely Manage G&A: We targeted keeping adjusted G&A expense below $300 millionshare price hurdles as measured in 2019. Adjusted G&A expense was actually $265.4 million in 2019, exceeding the objective by approximately 11%.
Closely Manage DSO: We targeted to end 2019 with a DSO of 69 to 76 daysconnection with the low endconsummation of the range representing outperformance. We achieved a DSO of 79 days, slightly more than the high end of the targeted range.
Closely Manage DPO: We targeted to end 2019 with a DPO of 50 to 55 days. We achieved a DPO of 58 days, outperforming the high end of the targeted range by approximately 5%.
Generate Free Cash Flow: We targeted generating a range of between $35 million to $50 million of free cash flow (calculated as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures) in 2019. We generated $5.9 million of free cash flow which was below the target range.
10

                 
Goal
 
% of Award
  
Target Achieved
  
Resulting Payout %
  
Target Payout %
 
EBITDA Target
  
75%
   
81.9%
   
47.9%
   
72.9%
 
Key Operational Objectives
  
25%
   
Target
   
25%
 
LTI Awards
The purposespecified corporate transactions. 80% of our LTI awards is to focus executives on the Company’s long-term performance and alignment of theirNEOs’ (other than Mr. McGovern) equity-based compensation with both our absolute and relative stock price performance. The 2019 LTI awards were granted by the Committee with 65.7% of the LTI grant value to our NEOsin 2022 came in the form of PSUs, 21.8%which further supports our commitment to paying for performance through achievement of share price hurdles set forth in the PSU award agreements following the completion of certain specified corporate transactions that occur prior to March 23, 2025.

In 2022, we granted equity-based awards in the form of RSUs and 12.5% inPSUs to Mr. Moore, Mr. Spexarth, Mr. Delahoussaye, Ms. Toups and Mr. Ellis, and RSUs to Mr. McGovern, with respect to the following numbers of units (and corresponding shares of Class B common stock options. LTI grant amounts are determined by dividingof the LTI grant value byCompany) per award:

NEO

 

RSUs

 

 

PSUs

 

Mr. McGovern

 

 

79,375

 

 

 

-

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

180,000

 

Mr. Spexarth

 

 

10,300

 

 

 

41,199

 

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

 

8,750

 

 

 

35,000

 

Mr. Ellis

 

 

8,840

 

 

 

35,360

 

Ms. Toups

 

 

8,000

 

 

 

32,000

 

83


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee considered the target payout of $100 per unit for PSUs,competitive data when setting the grant date fair market valueMIP award values, and consistent with private company practice, made upfront awards covering a multi-year period. Award values were set at the levels the Compensation Committee believed appropriate representing each individual NEO’s position within the Company and contribution to the accomplishment of our stock for RSUs and the ASC 718 grant date fair value for stock options.

Consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy, thestrategic objectives. The Compensation Committee believes stock-based incentivethat long-term equity awards are one of the best ways to align our executives’strongest link between executive compensation and stockholder interests with thoseand therefore comprise the largest component of our stockholders. In addition, the terms of the PSUs reflect the Committee’s belief that executive compensation should be tied directly to the Company’s financial and operational performance, including its stock price performance. The PSUs provide our executives the opportunity to earn additional compensation based on the Company’s relative financial and operational performance, including its relative stock price performance.
2019 LTI Program
At-A-Glance
Component of LTI Program
Terms
How the Award Furthers our Compensation
Principles
RSUs
(21.8% of grant value)
Pays out in equivalent number of shares of our common stock
Vests in equal annual installments over a
3-year
period, subject to continued service
Widely used in the energy industry to strengthen the link between stockholder and employee interests, while motivating executives to remain with the Company
Provides a bridge between the short-term and long-term interests of stockholders, and reduces the impact of share price volatility over industry cycles
Stock Options
(12.5% of grant value)
Exercise price at fair market value on grant date
Vests in equal annual installments over
3-year
period, subject to continued service
10-year
term
Motivates executives to continue to grow the value of the Company’s stock over the long-term as the value of the stock option depends entirely on the long-term appreciation of the Company’s stock price
PSUs
(65.7% of grant value)
3-year
performance period
Vests at the end of the
3-year
performance period, subject to continued service
Target payout of $100 per unit with an actual payout range of $0 to $200 per unit based on performance compared to our Performance Peer Group
Performance criteria link the Company’s long-term performance directly to compensation received by executive officers and other key employees and encourage them to make significant contributions towards increasing ROA and, ultimately, stockholder returns
11

Performance measures:
50% Relative ROA
50% Relative TSR
Payout in cash, although up to 50% of value may be paid in shares of stock in the Committee’s discretion
Use of TSR to better align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders
2019 LTI Program Awards
The award mix for NEOs during 2019 was 65.7% in PSUs, 21.8% in RSUs and 12.5% stock options.program. The following table shows the 2019 LTI2022 MIP grant date award value (denominatedvalues:

NEO

 

Total Value of 2022 RSU Awards

 

 

Total Value of 2022 PSU Awards

 

 

Total Grant Date Value
of 2022
MIP Awards

 

Mr. McGovern

 

$

4,667,250

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

4,667,250

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

2,646,000

 

 

 

7,200,000

 

 

 

9,846,000

 

Mr. Spexarth

 

 

605,640

 

 

 

1,647,960

 

 

 

2,253,600

 

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

 

514,500

 

 

 

1,400,000

 

 

 

1,914,500

 

Mr. Ellis

 

 

519,792

 

 

 

1,414,400

 

 

 

1,934,192

 

Ms. Toups

 

 

470,400

 

 

 

1,280,000

 

 

 

1,750,400

 

2022 Dividend Equivalent Payments

On November 16, 2022, in connection with its declaration of a special cash dividend of $12.45 per share of the Company’s Common Stock, the Board determined to make dividend equivalent payments to each holder of RSUs that were granted under the Company’s MIP. The Company paid each such RSU holder, including each of our NEOs, $12.45 per outstanding RSU (less any applicable withholdings) at the same time as a percentagethe special dividend was paid on the Company’s Common Stock. The Compensation Committee believed that making the dividend equivalent payments to the RSU holders at the same time as special dividends were received by investors allowed for the continued alignment of annual salary)management and shareholder interests.

Below is the approximate total value of the 2019 LTI grants (amounts reflecteddividend equivalent paid to each NEO:

 

Total Value

 

NEO

of 2022

 

 

Dividend Equivalent

 

Mr. McGovern

$

988,219

 

Mr. Moore

 

560,250

 

Mr. Spexarth

 

285,715

 

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

266,418

 

Mr. Ellis

 

110,058

 

Ms. Toups

 

257,080

 

The dividend equivalent payment is included in the Summary Compensation Table for RSUs and stock options reflect actual grant date fair values). The amounts reflected below reflect the LTI grant values and not the actual value received by any of the NEOs.

                     
NEO
 
2019 LTI
% of
Salary
  
Total Value Granted as
PSUs
  
Total Value Granted as
RSUs
  
Total Value Granted as
Options
  
Total Value of 2019
LTI Awards
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
600
% $
3,350,700
  $
1,111,800
  $
637,500
  $
5,100,000
 
Mr. Ballard
  
360
% $
1,123,943
  $
372,937
  $
213,840
  $
1,710,720
 
Mr. Moore
  
300
% $
989,294
  $
328,259
  $
188,222
  $
1,505,775
 
Mr. Bernard
  
300
% $
701,134
  $
232,644
  $
133,397
  $
1,067,175
 
Mr. Masters
  
300
% $
855,260
  $
283,785
  $
162,721
  $
1,301,766
 
Mr. Spexarth
  
300
% $
645,700
  $
214,250
  $
122,850
  $
982,800
 
Structure of PSUs
For the PSUs granted for the 2019-2021 cycle, under both performance criteria, the maximum, target and threshold levels are met when our ROA and TSR are in the 75
th
percentile, 50
th
percentile and 25
th
percentile, respectively, as compared to the ROA and TSR of the Performance Peer Group, as described in the following table:
             
Performance Level Relative to Performance Peer Group
 
Percent of
 Date-of-Grant

Value of PSU Received for
Relative ROA Level
  
Percent of
 Date-of-Grant

Value of PSU Received for
Relative TSR Level
  
Total Percent of
 Date-of-

Grant Value of PSU
Received
 
(Below 25th Percentile)
  
0
%  
0
%  
0
%
Threshold (25th Percentile)
  
25
%  
25
%  
50
%
Target (50th Percentile)
  
50
%  
50
%  
100
%
Maximum (75th Percentile or above)
  
100
%  
100
%  
200
%
The PSUs have a three year performance period, commencing January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2021, and will time-vest on December 31, 2021, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. Actual PSU performance results that fall
in-between
the “maximum,“All Other Compensation. “target” and
12

84


“threshold” levels will be calculated based on a sliding scale. For purpose of determining the Company’s ROA rank in the Performance Peer Group, we generate the results using income from operations data and net operating asset data derived from financial statements as reported by each peer company in their
year-end
annual report on Form
10-K,
uniformly adjusted for any
non-operational
charges as determined by established, independent third-party financial data providers. All calculations are validated by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
Payout of 2017-2019 PSUs
The PSUs granted for the 2017-2019 performance period were paid out in cash to the PSU recipients in April 2020. The Company ranked in the 17th percentile of relative TSR and in the 44th percentile of relative ROA, both as compared to its performance peers, resulting in a payout to the NEOs of $50 per PSU.
The PSU payout received by each NEO is reflected in the table below and in the “2019

2022 Executive Compensation

2022 Summary Compensation Table” under the column

“Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation.”
         
Named Executive Officer
 
Number of Units
  
Value of PSU Payout
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
25,500
  $
1,275,000
 
Mr. Ballard
  
6,000
  $
300,000
 
Mr. Moore
  
7,529
  $
376,450
 
Mr. Bernard
  
5,336
  $
266,800
 
Mr. Masters
  
6,140
  $
307,000
 
Mr. Spexarth
  
1,541
  $
77,050
 
Perquisites
We seek to maintain a cost conscious culture, and specifically in connection with the benefits and modest perquisites provided to executives. The Company provides each of our executive officers an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, and also reimburses them for business travel, as well as for all deductibles,
co-pays,
and other out of pocket expenses associated with our health insurance program through a program called ArmadaCare, and provides them with other limited perquisites. These perquisites are intended to ensure our executive officers are able to devote their full business time to the affairs of the Company. The attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the NEOs for 2019 are included in the “2019 Summary Compensation Table.” We believe the provision of these benefits was modest and appropriate in 2019.
Post–Employment Compensation
The Company also provides post-employment benefits to our executive officers through our SERP, including a
non-qualified
deferred compensation plan and certain severance and change of control benefits pursuant to employment agreements that we have with our executive officers. For more information on these plans, see the sections entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Retirement Benefit Programs” and “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.” For more information on the contributions, earnings and aggregate account balances for each NEO, see the table entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for 2019.”
As described in more detail under “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control,” we entered into employment agreements with all of our executive officers whereby the executives are entitled to severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment under certain conditions. We have determined that it is appropriate to provide our executives with severance benefits under these circumstances in light of their positions with the Company and as part of their overall compensation package. The severance benefits are generally designed to approximate the benefits each would have received had he remained employed by the Company through the remainder of the term covered by his employment agreement.
13

We believe that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change of control transaction creates uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our executive officers and distracts them from effectively performing their duties. This uncertainty results from the fact that many change of control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order to encourage our executive officers to remain employed with the Company during an important time when their prospects for continued employment following a transaction are often uncertain, we provide our executive officers with enhanced severance benefits under our Change of Control Severance Plan if their employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, in certain cases, by the executive for good reason in connection with a change of control (a double-trigger benefit). Because we believe that a termination by the executive for good reason may be conceptually the same as a termination by the Company without cause, and because we believe that in the context of a change of control, potential acquirers would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance, we believe it is appropriate to provide severance benefits in these circumstances. The change of control-related severance payments are made from a transaction sharing pool that is calculated as of the date of the change of control and based on the transaction value of the Company at the time of the change of control (with the transaction pool increasing or decreasing as the transaction value increases or decreases, respectively). The impact of a change of control on our long-term incentive awards is governed by the applicable award agreement, which currently provide for accelerated vesting upon a change of control. The terms of the employment agreements and the Change of Control Severance Plan and the benefits they provide are discussed more fully in the section entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”
Executive Compensation Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirement
We believe it is important that the interests of our executives and directors are aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers. Under the guidelines, required ownership levels are as follows:
Position
Stock Value as a Multiple
of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer
6x
Chief Financial Officer
3x
Executive Vice President
2x
Additionally, we included a requirement that our executives maintain ownership of at least 50% of the net
after-tax
shares of common stock acquired from the Company pursuant to any equity-based awards received from the Company, unless the executive has met his individual ownership requirement. The required share amount is determined as of the date the officer becomes subject to the guidelines, and is calculated by dividing such officer’s applicable base salary multiple by the
365-day
average closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE, and then rounding to the nearest 100 shares. The target ownership level does not change with changes in base salary or common stock price, but will change in the event the officer’s position level changes. Our executive officers are required to achieve their required ownership levels within five years from the date they become subject to the guidelines. The Committee will administer the guidelines and will periodically review each participant’s compliance (or progress towards compliance) and may impose additional requirements the Committee determines are necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this program. See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Management and Director Stock Ownership” for the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our NEOs.
Tax Implications
In structuring our executive compensation program, the Committee takes into account the tax treatment of our compensation arrangements, including compensation over $1 million paid to our NEOs who are “covered employees” as
non-tax
deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)). As in prior years, in 2019 the Committee considered the tax implications (including the lack of deductibility) when making compensation decisions, but continued to reserve the right to make compensation decisions based on other factors if it determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to do so.
14

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We have followed FASB ASC Topic 718 in accounting for stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to calculate the grant date “fair value” of their stock-based awards using a variety of assumptions. FASB ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based awards in their income statements over the period that an employee is required to render service in exchange for the award. We expect that we will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.
15

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed this CD&A with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that this CD&A be included in this Amendment.
Compensation Committee of the Board of  
Directors of Superior Energy Services, Inc.
The Report of the Compensation Committee is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
2019 Executive Compensation
2019 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each NEO for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2020.

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($)
(1)

 

 

Bonus
($)
(2)

 

 

Stock
Awards
($)
(3)

 

 

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(4)

 

 

All Other
Compensation
($)
(5)(6)

 

 

Total ($)

 

 Michael Y. McGovern

 

2022

 

 

637,345

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,667,250

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

998,925

 

 

 

6,303,520

 

 Executive Chairman

 

2021

 

 

1,203,904

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,325,006

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,528,910

 

 

 

2020

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Brian K. Moore (7)

 

2022

 

 

723,463

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,846,000

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

583,052

 

 

 

12,652,515

 

 President and Chief Executive Officer

 

2021

 

 

423,896

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

900,000

 

 

 

33,038

 

 

 

1,356,934

 

 

 

2020

 

 

430,871

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

240,928

 

 

 

973,947

 

 

 

1,645,746

 

 James W. Spexarth

 

2022

 

 

425,001

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,253,600

 

 

 

 

595,000

 

 

 

309,057

 

 

 

3,582,658

 

 Executive Vice President,

 

2021

 

 

327,495

 

 

 

125,000

 

 

 

1,000,030

 

 

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

38,526

 

 

 

1,788,551

 

 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

2020

 

 

293,580

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

151,200

 

 

 

652,570

 

 

 

1,097,350

 

 Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

2022

 

 

375,001

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,914,500

 

 

 

 

525,000

 

 

 

308,424

 

 

 

3,122,925

 

 President,

 

2021

 

 

301,077

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

500,015

 

 

 

 

262,500

 

 

 

77,892

 

 

 

1,141,484

 

 Workstrings International

 

2020

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Brian M. Ellis

 

2022

 

 

293,413

 

 

 

60,667

 

 

 

1,934,192

 

 

 

 

455,000

 

 

 

142,220

 

 

 

2,885,492

 

 President,

 

2021

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Wild Well Control, International Snubbing Services, and International Production Services

 

2020

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Deidre D. Toups

 

2022

 

 

349,999

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,750,400

 

 

 

 

490,000

 

 

 

280,860

 

 

 

2,871,259

 

 President,

 

2021

 

 

315,646

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

500,015

 

 

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

30,781

 

 

 

1,091,442

 

 Stabil Drill, HB Rentals and Completions

 

2020

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

(1)
Salary amounts shown in this column represent actual salary earned during the year, reported as gross earnings (i.e., gross amounts before taxes and applicable payroll deductions). Mr. McGovern’s annualized base salary beginning on July 18, 2022 was $750,000. His actual base salary paid for 2022, as shown in this column, reflects the fact that pursuant to the Executive Chairman Agreement, he received a cash lump sum payment in an amount equal to $288,306 to account for the annual base salary Mr. McGovern would have been paid since assuming the position of Executive Chairman on January 20, 2022 until the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement on July 18, 2022, less any payments received from the Company since assuming the position of Executive Chairman on January 20, 2022 until the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement on July 18, 2022 . Mr. McGovern received a $125,000 payment in February 2022 for his services. Mr. Moore’s annualized base salary beginning on January 20, 2022 after being appointed CEO was $750,000. His actual base salary paid for 2022, as shown in this column, was prorated based on his base salary rates in effect for the period he served as CEO and the period he served as executive vice president.
(2)
The Bonus column includes a $60,667 cash LTI payment for Mr. Ellis in 2022. In connection with Mr. Spexarth’s appointment as Interim Chief Financial Officer in 2021, Mr. Spexarth received a $125,000 cash bonus paid on August 15, 2021. Bonus amounts earned in 2021 and 2022 were paid in the following fiscal year under the AIP and are reported in the ‘Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation’ column of the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)
The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSUs, PSUs and restricted stock awards that we granted in 2022, 2021 and 2020. RSUs and restricted stock awards were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The PSUs were deemed to have a grant value of $40.00 for compensation purposes and are subject to termination and forfeiture for no consideration in the event no specified strategic transaction occurs prior to March 23, 2025. For a further discussion of share-based awards, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report. Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2022” for more information regarding the awards that were granted in 2022. No equity awards were granted in 2020.
(4)
The amounts reported in this column for 2022 reflect the amounts earned under the AIP, which were paid out in 2023. The Compensation Committee approved payouts under the 2022 AIP at the maximum level for Messrs. Spexarth, Delahoussaye, Ellis and Ms. Toups in recognition of their exemplary contributions and performance during 2022. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a payout of Mr. Moore’s 2022 AIP at the maximum level. The amounts reported in this column for 2021 reflect the amount earned under the AIP, which were paid out in 2022. The Compensation Committee approved payouts under the 2021 AIP at the target levels for Messrs. Spexarth, Delahoussaye, and Ms. Toups, and for Mr. Moore, a maximum level, in recognition of their exemplary contributions and performance during 2021. The amounts reported in this column for 2020 reflect a payout for the 2018 PSUs.
(5)
For 2022, the All Other Compensation amount includes a dividend equivalent payment in respect of each NEO’s RSUs equal to $12.45 per outstanding unvested RSU made in December 2022 as follows:

 

Total Value

 

NEO

of 2022

 

 

Dividend Equivalent

 

Mr. McGovern

$

988,219

 

Mr. Moore

 

560,250

 

Mr. Spexarth

 

285,715

 

Mr. Delahoussaye

 

266,418

 

Mr. Ellis

 

110,058

 

Ms. Toups

 

257,080

 

(6)
For 2022, the All Other Compensation amount includes (i) matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, (ii) life insurance premiums paid by us, (iii) dividend equivalent payments in respect of each NEO’s RSUs equal to $12.45 per outstanding RSU which was paid at the same time as the special dividend was paid on the Company’s Common Stock, and (iv) the value of perquisites, consisting of the provision of an country club memberships, automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, and relocation as set forth below. The aggregate value of each NEO’s 2022 dividend equivalent payment is reported in the “All Other Compensation” column because they were not factored into the grant

85


Table of Contents

date fair value of the RSU awards. For 2020, the amount includes certain amounts paid under the Key Employee Retention Program (the “KERP”). On September 28, 2020, the Board approved the implementation of the KERP, which was designed to retain key employees in their current roles over the near term while providing them with financial stability. KERP payments were made in October 2020 to Mr. Moore in an amount equal to $941,109 and to Mr. Spexarth in an amount equal to $614,250. The foregoing KERP payments resulted in the surrender of all unvested long-term incentive plan grants (other than the 2018 and 2017.2019 PSUs) made by us and an agreement to forego receipt of any annual bonus for 2020.
                                 
Name and Principal Position
 
Year
  
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
  
Option
Awards
(2)
  
Non-equity

Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(3)
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
  
Total ($)
 
David D. Dunlap
  
2019
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,111,800
   
637,484
   
2,204,756
   
226,460
   
5,030,500
 
President & Chief
  
2018
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,274,999
   
1,274,998
   
3,092,224
   
195,366
   
6,687,587
 
Executive Officer
  
2017
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,274,991
   
1,275,000
   
3,340,603
   
131,209
   
6,871,803
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
2019
   
475,200
   
0
   
372,911
   
213,823
   
646,525
   
97,322
   
1,805,781
 
Executive Vice President,
  
2018
   
433,333
   
0
   
395,998
   
396,003
   
703,462
   
96,281
   
2,025,077
 
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
  
2017
   
400,000
   
0
   
300,001
   
299,999
   
731,939
   
59,263
   
1,791,202
 
Brian K. Moore
  
2019
   
501,925
   
0
   
328,221
   
188,215
   
724,163
   
204,298
   
1,946,822
 
Executive
  
2018
   
501,925
   
0
   
376,442
   
376,446
   
988,774
   
206,997
   
2,450,584
 
Vice President
  
2017
   
501,925
   
0
   
376,448
   
376,442
   
1,057,995
   
156,218
   
2,469,028
 
A. Patrick Bernard
  
2019
   
355,725
   
0
   
232,606
   
133,381
   
500,262
   
166,132
   
1,388,106
 
Executive
  
2018
   
355,725
   
0
   
266,792
   
266,795
   
687,353
   
176,990
   
1,753,655
 
Vice President
  
2017
   
355,725
   
0
   
266,790
   
266,793
   
774,725
   
132,336
   
1,796.369
 
William B. Masters
  
2019
   
433,922
   
0
   
283,749
   
162,704
   
591,782
   
108,818
   
1,580,975
 
Executive Vice
  
2018
   
409,360
   
0
   
230,260
   
307,021
   
705,464
   
112,157
   
1,764,262
 
President and General Counsel
  
2017
   
409,360
   
0
   
307,015
   
307,021
   
796,374
   
102,944
   
1,922,714
 
James W. Spexarth
  
2019
   
327,600
   
0
   
214,250
   
122,828
   
292,053
   
78,280
   
1,035,011
 
Chief Accounting Officer
  
2018
   
307,208
   
0
   
320,079
   
152,421
   
342,676
   
72,845
   
1,195,229
 
  
2017
   
257,375
   
0
   
154,066
   
0
   
293,379
   
23,666
   
728,486
 

Name

 

401(k)
Contributions

 

 

Life Insurance
Premiums

 

 

Automobile and
Commuting

 

 

Relocation

 

 

Dividend Equivalents

 

 

Country Club

 

 

Total

 

 Mr. McGovern

 

$

10,385

 

 

$

321

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

988,219

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

998,925

 

 Mr. Moore

 

 

12,200

 

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

560,250

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

583,052

 

 Mr. Spexarth

 

 

12,200

 

 

 

1,542

 

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

285,715

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

309,057

 

 Mr. Delahoussaye

 

 

12,200

 

 

 

1,542

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

28,264

 

 

 

266,418

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

308,424

 

 Mr. Ellis

 

 

12,200

 

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

110,058

 

 

 

8,987

 

 

 

142,220

 

 Ms. Toups

 

 

12,200

 

 

 

1,542

 

 

 

10,038

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

257,080

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

280,860

 

(7)
Mr. Moore was a NEO in 2020 but not in 2021.
(1)The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSUs that we granted to the NEOs. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2019 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019” for more information regarding the stock awards we granted in 2019 and “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Long-Term Incentives” sets forth additional information related to RSUs.
(2)The Black-Scholes option model is used to determine the grant date fair value of the options that we grant to the NEOs. For additional information, refer to “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives” and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019.” For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2019 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019” for more information regarding the option awards we granted in 2019.
(3)Amounts disclosed for 2019 reflect the AIP payout received by our NEOs and the aggregate cash payout of PSUs with a performance period ending on the last day of 2019. Please see the “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives” for more information regarding the AIP and PSUs.
         
Name
 
AIP Payout
  
Value of PSU Payout
 
Mr. Dunlap
 $
929,756
  $
1,275,000
 
Mr. Ballard
 $
346,525
  $
300,000
 
Mr. Moore
 $
347,713
  $
376,450
 
Mr. Bernard
 $
233,462
  $
266,800
 
Mr. Masters
 $
284,782
  $
307,000
 
Mr. Spexarth
 $
215,003
  $
77,050
 
16

(4)For 2019, the amount includes (i) annual contributions to the NEOs’ retirement account under our SERP and matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, (ii) life insurance premiums paid by the Company and (iii) the value of perquisites, consisting of premium payments made under the ArmadaCare program, the provision of an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, commuting expenses and accrued dividend equivalents for outstanding time-based stock awards that were granted, but had not vested until 2019 at which time dividends were paid, as set forth below:
                         
Name
 
SERP
Contributions
  
401(k)
Contributions
  
Life
Insurance
Premiums
  
ArmadaCare
  
Automobile
and
Commuting
  
Dividends
 
David D. Dunlap
 $
181,222
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
18,000
  $
0
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
 $
60,484
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
9,600
  $
0
 
Brian K. Moore
 $
172,356
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
9,864
  $
9,600
  $
0
 
A. Patrick Bernard
 $
119,468
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
19,426
  $
0
 
William B. Masters
 $
71,140
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
10,440
  $
0
 
James W. Spexarth
 $
40,595
  $
11,200
  $
1,258
  $
15,132
  $
9,600
  $
495
 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2019

2022

The following table presents additional information regarding the PSU and RSU stock option awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2019.

                                     
 
Grant
Date
(2)
  
No. of Units
Granted
Under
Non-Equity

Incentive
Plan
Awards
(3)
  
Estimate Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
  
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
  
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(4)
  
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
  
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards
 
Name
Threshold
  
Target
  
Maximum
 
David D. Dunlap
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
637,500
  $
1,275,000
  $
2,550,000
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
33,507
  $
1,675,350
  $
3,350,700
  $
6,701,400
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
25,500
        $
1,111,800
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
25,914
  $
43.60
  $
637,484
 
                                     
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
237,600
  $
475,200
  $
950,400
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
11,239
  $
561,950
  $
1,123,900
  $
2,247,800
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
8,553
        $
372,911
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
8,692
  $
43.60
  $
213,823
 
                                     
Brian K. Moore
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
238,414
  $
476,829
  $
953,658
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
9,893
  $
494,650
  $
989,300
  $
1,978,600
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
7,528
        $
328,221
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
7,651
  $
43.60
  $
188,215
 
                                     
A. Patrick Bernard
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
160,076
  $
320,153
  $
640,305
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
7,011
  $
350,550
  $
701,100
  $
1,402,200
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
5,335
        $
232,606
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
5,422
  $
43.60
  $
133,381
 
                                     
William B. Masters
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
195,265
  $
390,530
  $
781,060
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
8,553
  $
427,650
  $
855,300
  $
1,710,600
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
6,508
        $
283,749
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
6,614
  $
43.60
  $
162,704
 
                                     
James W. Spexarth
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
147,420
  $
294,840
  $
589,680
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
6,457
  $
322,850
  $
645,700
  $
1,291,400
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
4,914
        $
214,250
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
4,993
  $
43.60
  $
122,828
 
2022. Fractional shares have been rounded to the nearest whole share for purposes of presentation.


 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant Date(1)

 

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target
($)

 

 

Maximum
($)

 

 

Threshold
(#)

 

 

Target
(#)

 

 

Maximum
(#)

 

 

Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)

 

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Awards
(2)

 

 Michael Y. McGovern

 

7/18/2022

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

79,375

 

 

 

4,667,250

 

 Brian K. Moore

 

3/28/2022

 

 

150,000

 

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

180,000

 

 

 

180,000

 

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

9,846,000

 

 James W. Spexarth

 

3/28/2022

 

 

59,500

 

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

595,000

 

 

 

10,300

 

 

 

41,199

 

 

 

41,199

 

 

 

10,300

 

 

 

2,253,600

 

 Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

3/28/2022

 

 

52,500

 

 

 

262,500

 

 

 

525,000

 

 

 

8,750

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

8,750

 

 

 

1,914,500

 

 Bryan M. Ellis

 

7/18/2022

 

 

45,500

 

 

 

227,500

 

 

 

455,000

 

 

 

8,840

 

 

 

35,360

 

 

 

35,360

 

 

 

8,840

 

 

 

1,934,192

 

 Deidre D. Toups

 

3/28/2022

 

 

49,000

 

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

490,000

 

 

 

8,000

 

 

 

32,000

 

 

 

32,000

 

 

 

8,000

 

 

 

1,750,400

 

(1)
For the PSU awards, in order for any PSUs to vest in connection with an applicable corporate transaction a certain share price must be achieved. The threshold level for the PSUs is based upon vesting at 25% of each of the PSU awards. Target refers to the number of PSUs that will vest if the highest share price is achieved in connection with an applicable corporate transaction. The NEOs are not eligible to earn more than the target award under the PSU award agreements.
(2)
17The RSU and PSU figures reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU and PSU awards granted in 2022, the RSUs were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and the PSUs were deemed to have a grant value of $40.00 for compensation purposes and are subject to termination and forfeiture for no consideration in the event no strategic transaction occurs prior to March 23, 2025.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

On March 28, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved (i) new forms of RSU award agreements and forms of PSU award agreements under the MIP and (ii) grants of RSUs and PSUs to Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye and Ms. Toups. On July 18, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved the grant of RSUs under the MIP to Messrs. McGovern and Ellis and PSUs under the MIP to Mr. Ellis. Awards made under the forms of RSU award agreements generally vest in three equal annual installments over a three-year period ending on the third anniversary of January 20, 2022, subject to earlier vesting in connection with certain specified corporate transactions (as set forth in the forms of PSU award agreements) and the grantee’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, and forfeiture on terms and conditions set forth in the forms of RSU award agreements. As disclosed above, the RSU and PSU awards were intended to cover a multi-year period (with the PSUs comprising 80 percent of the total equity award (except with respect to Mr. McGovern)), and the PSUs are subject to termination and forfeiture for no consideration in the event no strategic transaction occurs prior to March 23, 2025.

Awards made under the forms of PSU award agreements may be earned between 25% and 100% of the target award based on achievement of share price hurdles set forth in the forms of PSU award agreements and will vest to the extent that share price goals are achieved following the completion of certain specified corporate transactions that occur prior to March 23, 2025, subject to the grantee’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date and earlier forfeiture on terms and conditions set forth in the forms of PSU award agreements.

On March 28, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved employment agreements for each of Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye and Ms. Toups, which superseded and replaced their existing employment agreements with the Company,

86


(1)The amounts shown reflect possible payments under our 2019 AIP under which the NEOs were eligible to receive a cash bonus based on achievement of certain
pre-established
performance measures. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding our 2019 AIP.
(2)On February 5, 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the PSU, RSU and stock option awards for each of our NEOs.
(3)The amounts shown reflect PSU grants under our 2019 LTI plan. The PSUs have a
3-year
performance period during which the PSUs granted on February 5, 2019 have a performance period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. In addition, the PSUs vest on December 31, 2021, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the PSUs and the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.
(4)The stock options were granted as part of the 2019 LTI plan and vest
one-third
annually over a
3-year
period, commencing January 15, 2020. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.

except for Mr. Delahoussaye who was not a party to an employment agreement with the Company, and in Mr. Moore’s case also superseded his binding term sheet with the Company disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2022. Mr. Moore’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $750,000 and a target annual incentive award opportunity of 100% of his annual base salary. Mr. Spexarth’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $425,000 and a target annual incentive award opportunity of 70% of his annual base salary. Messrs. Delahoussaye’s and Ellis’ and Ms. Toups’ employment agreements provide for an annual base salary no lower than his or her current annual base salary as of the effective date of the applicable employment agreement. Please refer to the CD&A for information on the NEOs annual base salaries for 2022. On July 18, 2022, the Board of Directors and the compensation committee approved an executive chairman agreement for Michael Y. McGovern, the Company’s Executive Chairman. Mr. McGovern’s Executive Chairman Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $750,000, with an initial one-year term that automatically extends for an additional one-year term on the first anniversary of the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement unless either party gives 60 days’ prior written notice of non-renewal before expiration of the then-current term. Mr. McGovern’s annual base salary is subject to adjustment (upward or downward) if Mr. McGovern’s duties or commitments change during the term of the Executive Chairman Agreement. Further, in connection with his Executive Chairman Agreement, the Company agreed to accelerate the vesting of Mr. McGovern’s restricted shares of Class B common stock granted under the MIP in 2021. In addition, Mr. McGovern’s Executive Chairman Agreement provides for a cash lump sum payment to made within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement in an amount equal to $288,306 to account for the annual base salary Mr. McGovern would have been paid since assuming the position of Executive Chairman until the effective date less any payments received from the Company since assuming such position until the effective date of the Executive Chairman Agreement.

Each NEO’s base salary and bonus for 2022, as a percentage of total compensation varied, depending on the position. For Mr. McGovern, salary and bonus represented approximately 10.1% of total compensation. For Mr. Moore, salary and bonus represented approximately 17.6% of total compensation. For Mr. Spexarth, salary and bonus represented approximately 28.5% of total compensation. For Mr. Delahoussaye, salary and bonus represented approximately 28.8% of total compensation. For Mr. Ellis, salary and bonus represented approximately 28.0% of total compensation. For Ms. Toups, salary and bonus represented approximately 29.3% of total compensation.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019

2022 Year-End

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2019.

                                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
  
Option
Exercise
Price
  
Option
Expiration
Date
  
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(2)
  
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(3)
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
 
David D. Dunlap
              
35,373
  $
177,219
       
  
14,437
   
—  
  $
254.90
   
04/28/2020
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
6,021
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
6,671
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
3,696
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
16,035
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
21,582
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
24,000
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
83,102
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
10,166
   
5,085
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
7,404
   
14,808
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
—  
   
25,914
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
              
11,623
  $
58,231
       
  
843
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
331
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
1,806
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
2,801
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
4,185
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
14,491
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,392
   
1,196
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,742
   
3,484
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
720
   
1,442
  $
85.60
   
03/01/2028
             
  
0
   
8,692
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
Brian K. Moore
              
10,442
  $
52,314
       
  
4,427
   
—  
  $
232.90
   
01/31/2021
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
4,007
   
—  
  $
280.09
   
01/31/2022
             
  
4,697
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
6,372
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
7,086
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
24,536
     $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
3,002
   
1,500
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
2,186
   
4,372
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
0
   
7,651
   
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
A. Patrick Bernard
              
7,400
  $
37,074
       
  
4,072
   
—  
  $
219.30
   
04/01/2020
             
  
1,498
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
1,662
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
566
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
3,329
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
4,516
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
5,022
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
17,389
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,126
   
1,065
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,549
   
3,099
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
0
   
5,442
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
2022.

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

 

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (1) ($)

 

 

Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

 

 

Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (1) ($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Michael Y. McGovern

 

7/18/2022

 

 

79,375

 

 (2)

 

4,462,463

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Brian K. Moore

 

3/28/2022

 

 

45,000

 

 (2)

 

2,529,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,000

 

(5)

 

2,529,900

 

 James W. Spexarth

 

6/1/2021

 

 

5,228

 

 (3)

 

293,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/7/2021

 

 

12,649

 

 (4)

 

711,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,300

 

(5)

 

579,066

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

10,300

 

 (2)

 

579,066

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

8/10/2021

 

 

12,649

 

 (4)

 

711,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

8,750

 

 (2)

 

491,925

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,750

 

(5)

 

491,925

 

 Bryan M. Ellis

 

7/18/2022

 

 

8,840

 

 (2)

 

496,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/18/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,840

 

(5)

 

496,985

 

 Deidre D. Toups

 

7/7/2021

 

 

12,649

 

 (4)

 

711,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

8,000

 

 (2)

 

449,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,000

 

(5)

 

449,760

 

(1)
18Market value was determined based on an independent valuation report on the fair market value of the Company, pursuant to which the fair market value as of December 31, 2022 of the Company’s Class B common stock was estimated to be $56.22 per share. In accordance with the instructions to Item 402(f)(2), the number of PSUs reported in “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested” column, and the payout value reported in the “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested” column, is based on the achievement of threshold performance.
(2)
The RSUs vest on each of January 20, 2023 January 20, 2024 and January 20, 2025, provided generally that the NEO is still employed by us on each applicable vesting date.
(3)
One third of the shares underlying Mr. Spexarth’s restricted stock award vest on each of April 1, 2022, June 2, 2023 and June 2, 2024, provided generally that Mr. Spexarth is still employed by us on each applicable vesting. One third of the shares underlying Mr. Spexarth’s restricted stock award vested on April 1, 2022.
(4)
The RSU awards granted on November 23, 2021 will become 100% vested on January 7, 2023 in the case of the grants to Mr. Spexarth and Ms. Toups, and on February 19, 2023 in the case of Mr. Delahoussaye’s grant, in each case provided generally that the NEO is still employed by us on the applicable vesting date.

87


                                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
  
Option
Exercise
Price
  
Option
Expiration
Date
  
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(2)
  
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
  
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
 
William B. Masters
              
8,886
  $
44,519
       
  
3,200
   
—  
  $
219.30
   
04/01/2020
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
1,117
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
1,239
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
746
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
3,047
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
4,330
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
4,816
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
16,675
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,448
   
1,224
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,783
   
3,565
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
     
6,614
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
                                 
James W. Spexarth
                        
  
1,144
   
2,288
  $
85.60
   
01/15/2028
   
7,374
  $
36,944
   
—  
   
—  
 
  
0
   
4,993
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
(5)
The PSU awards may be earned between 25% and 100% of the target award based on achievement of share price hurdles set forth in the forms of PSU award agreements and will vest when and to the extent that share price hurdles are achieved following the completion of certain specified corporate transactions that occur prior to March 23, 2025, subject to the NEOs continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Market Value is based on the achievement of threshold performance which is 25%.
(1)Options vest ratably over a
3-year
period from the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.
(2)The RSUs held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2019 vest as follows, subject to continued service through the vesting date:
Name
Total Unvested RSUs
Vesting Schedule
David D. Dunlap
35,373
14,614 shares vesting on 1/15/20
12,259 shares vesting on 1/15/21
8,500 shares vesting on 1/15/22
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
11,623
4,662 shares vesting on 1/15/20
4,110 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,851 shares vesting on 1/15/22
Brian K. Moore
10,442
4,313 shares vesting on 1/15/20
3,619 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,510 shares vesting on 1/15/22
A. Patrick Bernard
7,400
3,057 shares vesting on 1/15/20
2,564 shares vesting on 1/15/21
1,779 shares vesting on 1/15/22
William B. Masters
8,886
3,642 shares vesting on 1/15/20
3,074 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,170 shares vesting on 1/15/22
James W. Spexarth
7,374
3,010 shares vesting on 1/15/20
2,726 shares vesting on 1/15/21
1,638 shares vesting on 1/15/22
(3)Based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2019 of $5.01, as reported on the NYSE.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2019

2022

The following table sets forth certainpresents information regarding the exercisevesting of restricted stock optionsawards held by our NEOs during 2022.

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting (#) (1)

 

 

Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2)

 

Michael Y. McGovern

 

 

23,463

 

 

 

1,379,624

 

Brian K. Moore

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

James W. Spexarth

 

 

2,614

 

 

 

153,703

 

Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Bryan M. Ellis

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Deidre D. Toups

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)
On July 18, 2022, the Board and the Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of 15,642 restricted shares of the Company’s Class B common stock held by Mr. McGovern. On April 1, 2022, one third of the shares underlying each of Mr. McGovern’s and Mr. Spexarth’s restricted stock awards vested.
(2)
The value realized by Mr. McGovern on the accelerated vesting of his restricted shares was computed by determining the fair market value per share on July 18, 2022 in accordance with ASC 718. The value realized by Mr. McGovern and Mr. Spexarth on the vesting of RSUs duringtheir restricted shares was computed by determining the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 for each of our NEOs.fair market value per share on April 1, 2022 in accordance with ASC 718.
19

                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
  
Value Realized
on Exercise
  
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(1)
  
Value Realized
on Vesting
(2)
 
David D. Dunlap
  
—  
   
—  
   
6,114
  $
234,778
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,812
  $
69,581
 
Brian K. Moore
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,805
  $
69,312
 
A. Patrick Bernard
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,279
  $
49,114
 
William B. Masters
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,103
  $
42,355
 
James W. Spexarth
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,991
  $
76,454
 
(1)Mr. Masters’ value excludes 367 deferred RSUs to be distributed upon retirement in 5 equal annual installments.
(2)Value realized is calculated based on the closing sale price on the vesting date of the award.
2019

Pension Benefits Table

None of ourthe NEOs participated in any defined benefit pension plans in 2019.2022.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2022

 Name

 

Aggregate Earnings in 2022

 

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions

 

 

Aggregate
Balance at
12/31/22

 

 Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SERP (1)

 

 

54,703

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 James W. Spexarth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NQDC Plan

 

 

19,787

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

491,426

 

 SERP (1)

 

 

3,585

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

89,729

 

 Deidre D. Toups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NQDC Plan

 

 

(181,351

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 SERP (1)

 

 

15,411

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

385,723

 

(1)
Pursuant to the terms of the SERP, aggregate earnings for 2022 were calculated at a rate of interest equal to 4.2%, which was the after-tax long-term borrowing rate.

88


Table of Contents

With regard to the NQDC Plan, participant accounts are treated as if invested in one or more investment vehicles selected by the participant. The annual rate of return for these funds for fiscal year 2022 was as follows:

Fund

One Year
Total Return

Nationwide VIT Money Market V

1.33

%

JPMorgan IT Core Bond 1

(12.58

)%

Vanguard VIF Total Bond Mkt Idx

(13.21

)%

Franklin Templeton VIP Global Bond 1

(4.85

)%

MFS VIT Value Svc

(6.14

)%

Fidelity VIP Index 500 Initial

(18.21

)%

American Funds IS Growth 2

(29.94

)%

JPMorgan IT Mid Cap Value 1

(8.16

)%

Vanguard VIF Mid Cap Index

(18.82

)%

Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Svc

(16.15

)%

DFA VA U.S. Targeted Value

(4.21

)%

DWS Small Cap Index VIP A

(20.64

)%

Vanguard VIF Small Co Gr

(25.35

)%

Nationwide VIT International Index I

(14.29

)%

Invesco VI EQV International Equity I

(18.31

)%

MFS VIT II International Intrinsic Value Svc

(23.75

)%

Vanguard VIF Real Estate Index

(26.30

)%

Retirement Benefit Programs

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The SERP providesSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) provided retirement benefits to the Company’s executive officers and certain other designated key employees. The SERP is an unfunded,

non-qualified
defined contribution retirement plan and all contributions under the SERP are in the form of credits to a notional account maintained for each participant. The Company may elect

Contributions: No SERP contributions were made in 2022 and no contributions are expected to set aside fundsbe made in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under thefuture. SERP though the funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.contributions have been discontinued since 2019.
Contributions: Under the SERP, the Company generally makes annual contributions ranging from 2.5% to 25% of salary and annual cash bonus based on the participant’s age and years of service. Executives whose combined age and years of service was at least 55 as of December 31, 2008, receive higher annual contributions, ranging from 10% to 35% of base salary and annual cash bonus. The highest annual contribution made for an NEO during 2019 was 20%. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may also make discretionary contributions to a participant’s SERP account.
Vesting: A participant vests in his SERP account upon the earliest to occur of: (i) attaining six years of service (including service prior to the adoption of the SERP), upon which amounts in the SERP account vest in 20% annual increments provided the participant remains employed; (ii) 
o
attaining age 65; (iii) a change ofin control; (iv) becoming disabled; or (v) termination of the participant’s employment without cause by the Company.cause. Regardless of their vested status, participants will forfeit all benefits under the SERP if they are terminated for cause or, if within 36 months after a termination without cause, engage in any activity in competition with any activity of the Company or inimical, contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company.certain competitive activities.
Earnings: Following the end of each plan year, SERP credits arewere adjusted to reflect earnings on the average daily balance of the notional accounts during the year, at a rate of interest equal to the Company’s
our after-tax
long-term borrowing rate for the year.
Payout: Upon separation from service, participants are paid their vested SERP accounts in a lump sum or installments, as elected by the participant, commencing seven months after separation from service.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan)

The NQDC Plan provides an income deferral opportunity for executive officers and certain senior managers of the Company who qualify for participation. Participants may also defer all or a portion of the common stock due upon vesting of RSU awards. The NQDC Plan is unfunded, but the Company may elect to set aside funds in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under the plan, though the funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

20

Contributions: Participants in the NQDC Plan maycould make an advance election each year to defer up to 75% of base salary, 100% of their annual bonus and 50% of the cash payout value of any PSUs. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide a match of up to 100% of the deferrals; however, the Company has never elected to grant a match.
Vesting: Participants are immediately 100% vested in their benefits under the NQDC Plan. No deferrals were elected for 2022.
Earnings: Participants may choosechose from a variety of investment options to invest their deferrals over the deferral period. Participants earn a rate of return on their NQDC Plan account that approximates the rate of return that would be provided by certain specified mutual funds that participants may designate from a list of available funds selected by the NQDC Plan administrative committee.

89


Table of Contents

Payout: Benefits are paid in either a
lump-sum
or in equal annual installments over a
2-
to
15-year
period, as elected by the participant. Generally, benefits that are due as a result of a termination of service are paid or commence in the seventh month after termination. However, only participants who are at least age 55 with at least five years of service at termination are eligible to receive or continue receiving installment distributions following termination.
See “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis”

We have not had enrollment periods for more information on these retirement programs.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for 2019
                     
Name
 
Executive
Contributions in
2019
(1)
  
Registrant
Contributions
in 2019
(2)
  
Aggregate
Earnings
in 2019
  
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
  
Aggregate
Balance at
12/31/19
 
David D. Dunlap
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
101,581
(3)  
—  
  $
459,682
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
181,222
   
67,087
(4)  
—  
  $
1,398,156
 
                     
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
60,484
  $
12,872
(4)  
—  
  $
294,060
 
                     
Brian K. Moore
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
172,356
  $
55,211
(4)  
—  
  $
1,174,037
 
                     
A. Patrick Bernard
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
1,538,130
(3)  
—  
  $
8,889,553
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
119,468
  $
77,174
(4)  
—  
  $
1,519,295
 
                     
William B. Masters
               
NQDC Plan
 $
217,191
   
—  
  $
22,313
(3)  
—  
  $
1,488,049
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
71,140
  $
39,299
(4)  
—  
  $
783,999
 
                     
James W. Spexarth
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
89,964
(3)  
—  
  $
445,313
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
40,595
  $
1,999
(4)  
—  
  $
76,941
 
(1)Of the contributions reflected in this column, the following contribution is part of the total compensation for 2019 and is included under the Salary column in the “Summary Compensation Table” herein: Mr. Masters — $43,336. The remainder of the contributions reported in this column for Mr. Masters is part of the total compensation reported for 2016 and 2018, but paid in 2019 (2016 PSU grant and 2018 Bonus paid in 2019).
(2)The amounts reflected are part of each executive’s total compensation for 2019 and are included under the All Other Compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(3)With regard to the NQDC Plan, participant contributions are treated as if invested in one or more investment vehicles selected by the participant. The annual rate of return for these funds for fiscal year 2019 was as follows:
21

Fund
One Year Total Return
NVIT Government Money Market V
1.83
%
JPMorgan IT Insurance Tr Core Bond 1
8.18
%
Vanguard VIF Total Bond Market Index
8.67
%
MFS VIT Value Svc
29.51
%
Fidelity VIP Index 500 Initial
31.35
%
American Funds IS Growth 2
30.77
%
JPMorgan Insurance Tr Mid Cap Value 1
26.76
%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Svc
35.16
%
DFA VA U.S. Targeted Value
22.56
%
Vanguard VIF Small Co Gr
28.05
%
MFS VIT II International Intrs Val Svc
25.64
%
Invesco VI II International Growth I
28.57
%
Vanguard VIF Real Estate Index
28.81
%
Templeton Global Bond VIP I
2.26
%
Vanguard VIF Mid Cap Index
30.87
%
DWS Small Cap Index VIP A
25.22
%
NVIT International Index I
21.77
%
(4)Pursuant to the terms of the SERP, aggregate earnings for 2019 were calculated at a rate of interest equal to 5.82%, which was our
after-tax
long-term borrowing rate.
the NQDC since 2019.

Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change ofin Control

In addition to the post-employment benefits under the Company’s 401(k) plan, the SERP and the NQDC Plan, each of

Because our NEOs are entitledbecame NEOs at different times and under different circumstances, the compensation and benefits awarded to severance benefits uponour individual NEOs in the event of termination of employment, including in connection withor a change ofin control of the Company under their employment agreements. See also “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.

varies. Below is a description of the employment agreements and Change of Control Severance Planother arrangements in place with each of our NEOs. As required by the SEC’s disclosure rules, we

Employment Agreements. Mr. Moore’s and Mr. Spexarth’s employment agreements each have included disclosure quantifying the potential payments to our NEOs under various termination and change of control scenarios based on the agreements in place as of December 31, 2019.

Executive Employment Agreements and Severance Program
All of our NEOs are party to the same form of employment agreement. Thean initial three-year term of each employment agreement is three years and the termthat automatically extends for an additional yearone-year term unless either party gives 60 days’ prior written notice of non-renewal before expiration of the then-current term. Mr. Delahoussaye’s and Ms. Toups’s employment agreements each have an initial two-year term that automatically extends for an additional one-year term unless either party gives 60 days’ prior written notice of non-renewal before expiration of the then-current term.

Pursuant to their employment agreements, Mr. Moore and Mr. Spexarth consented to the termination of the Change of Control Severance Plan and waived their right to receive the severance payments and benefits thereunder. None of our other NEOs participated in the Change of Control Severance Plan, which automatically terminated upon obtaining the requisite consents from the participants.

Mr. Ellis’ employment agreement has an initial two-year term that automatically extends for an additional one-year term unless either party gives 60 days’ prior written notice of non-renewal before expiration of the then-current term.

Executive Chairman Agreement for Mr. McGovern. Mr. McGovern’s Executive Chairman Agreement has an initial one-year term with an automatic extension for an additional one-year term on the secondfirst anniversary of the effective date and each subsequent anniversary thereafter, unless either the Company or Mr. McGovern gives 60 days’ prior written notice not to extendof non-renewal before the term isnext anniversary of the effective date.

The termination and change in control payments and benefits provided byfor in the Company or the NEO. The employment agreements entitlesand Executive Chairman Agreement for our NEOs to:

a base salary;
eligibility for annual incentive bonuses and LTI awards as approved by the Compensation Committee;
participation in the retirement and welfare benefit plans of the Company; and
participation in our Change of Control Severance Plan
are described below.

Termination due to Incapacity, No Cause, Good Reason without a Change ofin Control

Michael Y. McGovern. If (1)we terminate Mr. McGovern for any reason other than (i) his death or incapacity, (ii) “cause,” as such term is defined in the Company terminates an NEO’s employment (a) due to incapacityexecutive chairman agreement, (iii) non-renewal of the executive chairman agreement or (b) without cause(iv) the occurrence of a change in control, or (2) the NEOif Mr. McGovern terminates his employment for good“good reason, as such term is defined in the employmentexecutive chairman agreement, andthen he will be entitled to the termination underfollowing: (1)(b) or (2) is not due to a change of control, then the Company will pay or provide the NEO:
the NEO’s base salary through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid cash incentive compensation for the preceding calendar year, any rights under the terms of equity awards and any medical or other welfare benefits required by law (the Accrued Amounts);
22

a lump sum payment equal to:to the base salary he would have been paid from the date of termination through the then current term of the executive chairman agreement, and (2) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits through the end of then-current term for himself and his spouse and family.
Brian K. Moore. If we terminate Mr. Moore without “cause” or he terminates his employment for “good reason,” as each such term is defined in his employment agreement, then he will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of the NEO’shis annual salary plus target annual bonus; and
the NEO’s
pro-rated
target annual bonus for the year of termination;termination, (2) a pro-rated target annual bonus for the year of termination and
(3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for himself and his spouse and family.
James W. Spexarth. If we terminate Mr. Spexarth without “cause” or he terminates his employment for “good reason,” as each such term is defined in his employment agreement, then he will be entitled to the NEOfollowing: (1) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination, (2) a pro-rated target annual bonus for the year of termination and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for himself and his spouse and family.
Michael J. Delahoussaye. If we terminate Mr. Delahoussaye without “cause,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, and such termination is not in connection with a change in control, then he will be entitled to the NEO’sfollowing: (1) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of his annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, the actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; (2) a pro-rated portion of his

90


Table of Contents

target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 12 months for himself and his spouse and/and family.
Bryan M. Ellis. If we terminate Mr. Ellis without “cause,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, and such termination is not in connection with a change in control, then he will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of his annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination, (2) a pro-rated target annual bonus for the year of termination or, family (the Welfare Continuation Benefit).if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 12 months for himself and his spouse and family.
Deidre D. Toups. If we terminate Ms. Toups without “cause,” as such term is defined in her employment agreement, and such termination is not in connection with a change in control, then she will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of her annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, her actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; (2) a pro-rated portion of her target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, her actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 12 months for herself and her spouse and family.

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control

Michael J. Delahoussaye. If we terminate Mr. Delahoussaye without cause or he terminates his employment for “good reason,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, and such termination is within 6 months before or 24 months after a “change in control,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, then he will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; (2) a pro-rated portion of his target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for himself and his spouse and family.
Bryan M. Ellis. If we terminate Mr. Ellis without cause or he terminates his employment for “good reason,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, and such termination is within 6 months before or 24 months after a “change in control,” as such term is defined in his employment agreement, then he will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; (2) a pro-rated portion of his target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, his actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for himself and his spouse and family.
Deidre D. Toups. If we terminate Ms. Toups without cause or she terminates her employment for “good reason,” as such term is defined in her employment agreement, and such termination is within 6 months before or 24 months after a “change in control,” as such term is defined in her employment agreement, then she will be entitled to the following: (1) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of her annual salary plus target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, her actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; (2) a pro-rated portion of her target annual bonus for the year of termination or, if no target annual bonus has been set, her actual bonus received for the previous calendar year; and (3) Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for herself and her spouse and family.

The payments and benefits described above (other than the Accrued Amounts) are subject to the NEO’s timely execution of a release of claims in favor of us. Each employment agreement includes an indefinite confidentiality and protection of information covenant and a mutual one-year non-disparagement covenant. Upon termination of employment by us for cause or resignation without good reason, each NEO will be bound by a non-competition and non-solicitation covenant for one year after the Company.

Termination for No Cause or Good Reason with Changedate of Control
.
    Iftheir termination.

Equity Awards

2021 RSUs and Restricted Stock Awards

With respect to the RSUs and restricted stock awards granted in 2021, upon the termination of an NEO’s employment by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the MIP), by the NEO for “good reason” (defined in the MIP to mean the NEO's written agreement relating to the employment or services of such NEO, if any) or due to the NEO’s “disability” (as defined in the MIP), the NEO will vest

91


Table of Contents

in a pro rata portion of the NEO’s unvested restricted stock and RSUs. With respect to the RSUs, such pro rata portion will be determined by dividing the number of days elapsed since the grant date through the NEO’s termination date by the number of days from the grant date through the vesting date. With respect to Mr. Spexarth’s restricted stock award, such pro rata portion will be determined by dividing the number of days that elapsed from the vesting date immediately preceding Mr. Spexarth’s termination date (or, if none, the grant date) through the termination date by 365. In addition, an NEO’s outstanding restricted stock and RSU awards will become 100% vested upon his or her death or the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in the MIP) (subject to the NEO’s continued employment immediately prior to such change in control).

2022 RSUs and PSUs

The RSUs and PSUs granted to Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye, Ellis and Ms. Toups do not provide for any accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of the NEO’s employment. With respect to the RSUs granted to Mr. McGovern, in the event that Mr. McGovern’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause“cause” (excluding due to death or ifdisability (as defined in the NEO terminates his employmentExecutive Chairman Agreement)) or by Mr. McGovern for good reason and“good reason” (as defined in the termination occurs within 6 months before or 24 months after a change of control, then the Company will be required to pay or provide:

the Accrued Amounts;
a cash severance payment pursuant to the terms of our Change of Control Severance Plan described below;
a lump sum amount equal to the NEO’s
pro-rated
target annual bonus for the year of termination;
outplacement services for one year after termination at a cost of up to $10,000; and
the Welfare Continuation Benefit.
The payments and benefits described above (other than the Accrued Amounts) areExecutive Chairman Agreement), subject to the NEO’sMr. McGovern’s timely execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company. The Company does not provide excise tax
gross-ups
underand continued compliance with his restrictive covenants, the employment agreements or Changetranche of Control Severance Plan discussed below.
Termination for Cause, Death or Without Good Reason
. IfRSUs scheduled to vest on the NEO is terminated by the Company for cause, due to the NEO’s death or by the NEO without good reason, then the Company will only be required to pay to the NEO or the NEO’s estate the Accrued Amounts.
Each employment agreement contains an indefinite confidentiality and protection of information covenant and a mutual
non-disparagement
covenant for one year after termination of employment. If the NEO is terminated by the Company for cause or if the NEO terminates the NEO’s employment without good reason, the NEO will also be bound by a
non-compete
and
non-solicitation
covenant for one year afternext scheduled vesting date following the date of termination (i.e., one third (1/3rd)) will vest. In addition, Mr. McGovern’s RSU award will become 100% vested upon the NEO’s termination.
Changeoccurrence of Control Severance Plan.
Each NEO participates in the Company’s Change of Control Severance Plan and is eligible to receive certain cash severance payments upon a termination of employment without cause or for good reason that occurs within 6 months before or 24 months after a change of control. The potential severance payments due under the plan are determinedin control, subject to Mr. McGovern’s continued employment as of the date of such change in control.

With respect to the changePSU award agreement entered into with Mr. Delahoussaye, in the event of control, based on a sharing pool that is calculated as a percentagesale of Workstrings International (a “Workstrings Sale”), subject to Mr. Delahoussaye’s continued employment through the consummation of the transaction value (withWorkstrings Sale, 100% of Mr. Delahoussaye’s PSUs and RSUs will vest notwithstanding the sharing pool increasingshare price hurdles set forth in the PSU award agreement and, with respect to the PSU award agreement entered into with Ms. Toups, in the event of a sale of Specialized Rental and Services Division (a “SRSD Sale”), subject to Ms. Toups continued employment through the consummation of a SRSD Sale, 100% of the RSUs and PSUs will vest notwithstanding the share price hurdles set forth in the PSU award agreement. With respect to the PSU award agreement entered into with Mr. Ellis, in the event of a sale of Wild Well Control and International Snubbing Services (a “Wild Well Sale”), subject to Mr. Ellis’ continued employment through the consummation of a Wild Well Sale, 100% of the RSUs and PSUs will vest notwithstanding the share price hurdles set forth in the PSU award agreement.

The RSU awards granted to the NEOs (other than Mr. McGovern) do not automatically vest upon a change in control. The RSU awards granted to the NEOs (other than Mr. McGovern) will become 100% vested upon the occurrence of an “applicable corporate transaction” in which the threshold share price hurdle is achieved pursuant to the NEO’s PSU award agreement, or decreasing asearlier in the transaction value increasesevent of a Workstrings Sale with respect to Mr. Delahoussaye’s RSUs, a SRSD Sale with respect to Ms. Toups’ RSUs, or decreases, respectively). The Company doesa Wild Well Sale with respect to Mr. Ellis’ RSUs.

We do not provide excise tax

gross-ups
gross ups under our severance plan.
Calculation of change of control severance benefits
. The severance benefit is equal to each participant’s portionany employment agreement or equity award discussed above. Each of the total cash availableemployment agreements discussed above provides for a “best net” approach in the sharing pool. Each participant’sevent that severance benefitand other payments and benefits result in “excess parachute payments” under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G. Under a “best net” approach, the NEO’s payments and benefits will be determined based onreduced to avoid triggering excise tax if the datereduction would result in a greater after-tax amount for the NEO compared to the amount he or she would receive net of the change of control and will ensure: (1) each participant receives the same percentage of the total net
after-tax
benefit that would be received by all participants under the plan as the participant’s percentage interest; and (2) the total net
after-tax
benefit received by all participants is maximized.
23

Determination of “sharing pool.”
The total severance benefits payable under the plan may not exceed the “sharing pool.” The sharing pool is determined based on the transaction value as defined in the plan at the time of the change of control as follows:
         
Transaction Value
(in Billions)
 
Sharing Pool
(6 Executives)
  
Sharing Pool as a
Percentage of
Transaction Value
(Approximate)
 
$1.0
 $
14,200,000
   
1.42
%
$2.0
 $
17,125,601
   
0.86
%
$2.5
 $
17,726,908
   
0.71
%
$3.0
 $
18,345,266
   
0.61
%
$3.5
 $
18,981,202
   
0.54
%
If the actual transaction value at the time of a change of control falls between the transaction values shown above, the sharing pool will be interpolated. If the transaction value is greater than the transaction values identified above, the sharing pool value will increase linearly. The Compensation Committee will determine the sharing pool should the applicable transaction value fall outside the values above. In addition, the sharing pool values will be adjustedexcise tax if new participants are added to or removed from the plan between the effective date of the plan and the date of the change of control. Specifically, the sharing pool will be decreased or increased, as applicable, by the amount that is equal to the applicable transaction value multiplied by 0.07% or 0.04% if the individual is in the top half or bottom half, respectively, of participants ranked by their “combined compensation” (as defined in the plan), as determined by the Compensation Committee. Under the plan, a participant’s “combined compensation” is the sum of the participant’s base salary, target bonus and unvested LTI, as those terms are defined in the plan.
Calculation of participant’s percentage interest in the sharing pool
. Each participant’s interest or “participation alignment” in the sharing pool is initially determined by dividing the participant’s “combined compensation” by the sum of the combined compensation for all participants, thus resulting in a percentage amount for each participant which, add up to 100%. The difference between the participation alignment of the participant with the highest combined compensation and the participation alignment of the participant with the second highest combined compensation of all the participants as of the date of the change of control may not exceed the percentage that is equal to (1/n)% +12%, where n is the number of participants as of the date of the change of control. If necessary, the participation alignment of the participant with the highest combined compensation as of the date of the change of control will be decreased and the participation alignments of each of the other participants increased on a pro rata basis so that (1) the rule contained in the preceding sentence is respected and (2) the sum of the participation alignments of all participants is equal to 100% (effectively capping the highest paid NEO’s benefit).
Equity Awards
Upon the termination of an NEO’s employment due to retirement, death or disability or a termination without cause by the Company, accelerated vesting of NEO equity awards will only occur upon (1) the retirement, death or disability of the NEO prior to the end of the applicable performance period; or (2) termination of the NEO’s employment (i) by the Company without cause or (ii) by the NEO for good cause as defined in the employment agreement, if termination under (i) or (ii) occurs after a change of control.
no reduction were made.

Except as otherwise noted, the following table quantifies the potential payments to our NEOs under their employment arrangements and our Change of Control Severanceequity awards discussed above and the SERP and the NQDC Plan, discussedas described above, for various scenarios involving a change ofin control or termination of employment of each of our NEOs in such position at the end of the year, assuming a December 31, 20192022 termination date and where applicable, using the closing price of our common stock of $5.01 (as reported on the NYSEestimated fair market value as of December 31, 2019).2022 of $56.22 per share of our Class B common stock. Given that a change in control would likely constitute an “applicable corporate transaction” (as defined in the PSU award agreement) and based on the fact that the estimated fair market value as of December 31, 2022 of $56.22 per share of our Class B common stock is greater than the threshold share price hurdle, we quantified in the table below 100% vesting of RSUs granted in 2022 to Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye, Ellis and Ms. Toups, and 100% vesting of the PSUs granted in 2022 to Messrs. Moore, Spexarth, Delahoussaye, Ellis and Ms. Toups. Excluded are benefits provided to all employees, such as accrued vacation and benefits provided by third parties under our life and other insurance policies. Also excluded are benefits our NEOs would receive upon termination of employment under the SERP and the NQDC Plan, as described above, as well as benefits under our 401(k) plan. The table also assumes the following:

the number of participants in the Change of Control Severance Plan is six;
the transaction value on December 31, 2019 is $1.2 billion (estimated value assumes equity based on our December 29, 2019 closing stock price plus all outstanding debt reflected on the December 31, 2019 balance sheet); and
the corresponding sharing pool is $14,791,149.
24

92


 Name

 

Termination without Cause

 

 

Resignation for Good Reason

 

 

Termination without Cause / for Good Reason in Connection with a Change of
Control (1)

 

 

Change of Control Alone

 

 

Voluntary Termination

 

 

Death

 

 

Disability

 

 Michael Y. McGovern

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

406,849

 

 

$

406,849

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

1,487,469

 

 

 

1,487,469

 

 

 

4,462,463

 

 

 

4,462,463

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

1,894,318

 

 

$

1,894,318

 

 

$

4,462,463

 

 

$

4,462,463

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

3,000,000

 

 

$

3,000,000

 

 

$

3,000,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Prorated Bonus (at target)

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 SERP

 

 

1,369,171

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 

 

1,369,171

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,529,900

 

 

 

2,529,900

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 PSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,119,600

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

24,343

 

 

 

24,343

 

 

 

24,343

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

5,143,514

 

 

$

5,143,514

 

 

$

17,793,014

 

 

$

2,529,900

 

 

$

1,369,171

 

 

$

1,369,171

 

 

$

1,369,171

 

 James W. Spexarth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

1,445,000

 

 

$

1,445,000

 

 

$

1,445,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Prorated Bonus (at target)

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 SERP

 

 

89,729

 

 

 

89,729

 

 

 

89,729

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

89,729

 

 

 

89,729

 

 

 

89,729

 

 NQDC Plan

 

 

491,426

 

 

 

491,426

 

 

 

491,426

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

491,426

 

 

 

491,426

 

 

 

491,426

 

 Restricted Stock Acceleration

 

 

110,304

 

 

 

110,304

 

 

 

293,918

 

 

 

293,918

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

293,918

 

 

 

110,304

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

702,019

 

 

 

702,019

 

 

 

1,290,193

 

 

 

1,290,193

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

711,127

 

 

 

702,019

 

 PSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,316,208

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

3,173,336

 

 

$

3,173,336

 

 

$

6,261,332

 

 

$

1,584,111

 

 

$

581,155

 

 

$

1,586,200

 

 

$

1,393,478

 

 Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

637,500

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,275,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Prorated Bonus (at target)

 

 

262,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

262,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

647,542

 

 

 

647,542

 

 

 

1,203,052

 

 

 

1,203,052

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

711,127

 

 

 

647,542

 

 PSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,967,700

 

 

 

1,967,700

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

18,679

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

1,566,221

 

 

$

647,542

 

 

$

4,745,610

 

 

$

3,170,752

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

711,127

 

 

$

647,542

 

 Bryan M. Ellis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

570,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,105,000

 

 

$

1,105,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Prorated Bonus (at target)

 

 

227,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

227,500

 

 

 

227,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

496,985

 

 

 

496,985

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 PSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,987,939

 

 

 

1,987,939

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

18,679

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

816,179

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,854,782

 

 

$

3,817,424

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Deidre D. Toups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Severance Pay

 

$

595,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,190,000

 

 

$

1,190,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 Prorated Bonus (at target)

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 SERP

 

 

385,723

 

 

 

385,723

 

 

 

385,723

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

385,723

 

 

 

385,723

 

 

 

385,723

 

 NQDC Plan

 

 

1,277,117

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 

 

1,277,117

 

 RSU Acceleration

 

 

702,019

 

 

 

702,019

 

 

 

1,160,888

 

 

 

1,160,887

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

711,127

 

 

 

702,019

 

 PSU Acceleration

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,799,040

 

 

 

1,799,040

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 COBRA Payments

 

 

18,679

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37,358

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Total

 

$

3,223,538

 

 

$

2,364,859

 

 

$

6,095,126

 

 

$

4,394,927

 

 

$

1,662,840

 

 

$

2,373,967

 

 

$

2,364,859

 

                             
Name
 
Lump Sum
Severance
Payment
  
Outstanding
Unvested
Options
  
Outstanding
RSUs
  
Outstanding
PSUs
  
Health
Benefits
  
Tax
Gross-Up
  
Total
 
                             
David D. Dunlap
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
177,219
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
177,219
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
  $
177,219
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,769,171
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,591,952
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,591,952
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
3,515,922
   
n/a
  $
177,219
  $
11,801,400
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
15,561,493
 
                             
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
58,231
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
58,231
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
4,465,809
   
n/a
  $
58,231
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,501,183
 
Termination – No Cause
  
4,465,809
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,442,952
 
Termination – Good Reason
  
4,465,809
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,442,952
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
4,465,809
   
n/a
  $
58,231
  $
3,831,800
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
8,422,792
 
                             
Brian K. Moore
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
    
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
52,314
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
52,314
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
  $
52,314
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,532,074
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,479,760
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,479,760
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
2,216,829
   
n/a
  $
52,314
  $
3,484,400
  $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
5,798,967
 
                             
A. Patrick Bernard
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
37,074
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
37,074
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
  $
37,074
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,775,934
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,738,860
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,738,860
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
1,247,846
   
n/a
  $
37,074
  $
2,469,400
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
3,821,272
 
                             
William B. Masters
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
44,519
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
44,519
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
  $
44,519
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,150,904
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,106,385
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,106,385
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
3,620,362
   
n/a
  $
44,519
  $
2,938,600
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
6,670,433
 
                             
James W. Spexarth
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
36,944
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
36,944
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
  $
36,944
   
(2
) $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
1,644,319
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
1,607,375
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
67.655
   
n/a
  $
1,607,375
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
2,956,932
   
n/a
  $
36,944
  $
2,236,400
  $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
5,297,931
 
(1)Certain of the benefits described in the table would be achieved in the event of a change of control alone and would not require a termination of the NEO’s employment. In particular, pursuant to the terms of our incentive award plans and the individual award agreements, upon a change of control as defined in the plans, (i) all outstanding stock options would immediately vest, (ii) all restrictions on outstanding RSUs would lapse and (iii) all outstanding PSUs would be paid out as if the maximum level of performance had been achieved. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table above, upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change of control, each NEO is also entitled to outplacement assistance of up to $10,000.
(1)
The total cash severance due toPSU calculations reflect full acceleration of the PSUs upon a change in control multiplied by a price per Class B share of control for our CEO, Mr. Dunlap, is less than 2x the sum of his base salary identified in the Summary Compensation Table and his target bonus in 2019. The lump sum severance payment due to each NEO would consist$56.22. For purposes of the following:
25

                 
Name
 
Change of
Control
Severance Plan
Payment
  
Target Bonus
Payment
  
Total Cash
Severance
Payment
  
Total Cash
Severance
Multiple of Base
Salary + Target
Bonus
 
David D. Dunlap
 $
2,240,922
  $
1,275,000
  $
3,515,922
   
1.7x
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
 $
3,990,609
  $
475,200
  $
4,465,809
   
4.7x
 
Brian K. Moore
 $
1,740,000
  $
476,829
  $
2,216,829
   
2.3x
 
A. Patrick Bernard
 $
927,693
  $
320,153
  $
1,247,846
   
1.8x
 
William B. Masters
 $
3,229,832
  $
390,530
  $
3,620,362
   
4.4x
 
James W. Spexarth
 $
2,662,091
  $
294,840
  $
2,956,931
   
4.8
 
(2)Pursuant to the terms of the PSU award agreements, if an NEO’s employment terminates prior to the end of the applicable performance period as a result of retirement, death, disability, or termination for any reason other than the voluntary termination by the NEO or termination by the Company for cause, then the NEO retains a
pro-rata
portion of the NEO’s then-outstanding PSUs based on the NEO’s employment during the performance period and the remaining units will be forfeited. The retained units will be valued and paid out to the NEO in accordance with their original payment schedule based on the Company’s achievement of the applicable performance criteria. Upon a voluntary termination by the NEO or a termination by the Company for cause, all outstanding units are forfeited.
CEO Pay Ratio
The following is a reasonable estimatetable below, we have assumed full acceleration of the pay ratioPSUs as a result of our median compensated employee comparedshare price hurdles being tied to our CEO based on the “2019 Summary Compensation Table” data and real pay data which includes salary, payouts from the AIP, PSUs and the value of vested RSUs (valuing the shares basedCompany’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock The Company estimates that the Class B common stock valuation at December 31, 2022 was lower than the Class A common stock due to the illiquidity of the Class B common stock and inability to elect directors.

93


Table of Contents

CEO Pay Ratio

The table below sets forth comparative information regarding the 2022 annual total compensation of Mr. Moore, who filled the position of our CEO beginning on January 20, 2022 and was CEO on the closing price at

year-end)
median employee identification date, and the gain on2022 annual total compensation of the exercisemedian employee.

CEO Pay Ratio

 

 CEO 2022 Annual Total Compensation

 

$

12,668,131

 

 Median Employee 2022 Annual Total Compensation

 

 

44,722

 

Developments during 2022 required a review of any stock options:

CEO Pay Ratio
Compensation Table Pay
Real Pay
Pay Ratio
50:1
31:1
In 2019, there were no meaningful changesthe analysis to ourdetermine the median employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would have significantly impactedfor comparison to determine the CEO pay ratio disclosure. As a result, our median compensated employee remained the same as identified in 2019 as allowed by the SEC rules.
To summarize theratio. The methodology we used in identifying the 2022 median compensated employee in 2018,was substantially similar to prior period reviews. As we did for 2021, for 2022, no international employees were excluded under the 5% de minimis exception. We consistently applied the compensation measure of total taxable compensation which included base salary, overtime, bonuses paid in 2022, long-term incentives granted in 2022 and anyall other typetypes of taxable compensation. In ourthe analysis, we included all part-time and full-time U.S. and
non-U.S.
employees who were employed by the Companyus as of December 31, 2018. The 5% de minimis exception2022 were included.

Approximately 2,198 part-time and full-time U.S. and non-U.S. employees (other than Mr. Moore but including Mr. McGovern), who were employed as of December 31, 2022, were included. December 31, 2022 was applied, allowingselected as the exclusion of

non-U.S.
employees if they account for 5% or less ofdate to identify our total employees.
Non-U.S.
employees were excluded under the 5% de minimis exception from Indonesia, Trinidad and Tobago, India and Colombia. The exclusion of
non-U.S.
employees represented less than 5% of our total number of employees.median compensated employee. Given that we have global operations and employees located in many locations, pay and reporting systems and pay practices vary depending on the region. As a result, assumptions, adjustments and estimates were consistently applied to identify the annual total taxable compensation of the median compensated employee. In addition, anomalies relatedInternational compensation was converted to compensation were excludedUSD for comparison purposes using conversion rates as allowed by the SEC. We selectedof December 31, 2018 as the date to identify our median compensated employee.2022. Based on the methodology described above, ourthe median compensated employee is an hourly field trainingoperations employee who has worked for our Companyus for eight years.
approximately a year and a half.

In 2019, our2022, the median compensated employee earned an annual total compensation of $99,759. Our CEO’s$44,722. The 2022 annual total compensation reflectedfor Mr. Moore was $12,668,131. This amount equals Mr. Moore’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation was $5,030,500.Table plus an additional amount that reflects the annualization of his increased base salary for 2022, consistent with the applicable guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, the pay ratio between our CEO’s annual total annual compensation and ourthe median compensated employee’s annual total annual compensation was 50:283:1 in 2019. The pay ratio between2022.

Mr. Moore’s 2022 equity-compensation awards were intended to cover a multi-year period and neither Mr. Moore nor any other NEO is expected to receive equity-based compensation in 2023 or 2024. Also, Mr. Moore’s PSUs had a deemed value of $7,200,000 and, as further discussed in our CEO’s real pay and our median compensated employee’s real pay was 31:1CD&A, Mr. Moore’s PSUs will only vest upon achievement of certain share price hurdles in 2019.

26

2019connection with the consummation certain specified transactions that occur prior to March 23, 2025 or such PSUs will terminate for no consideration.

2022 Director Compensation

In 2019, directors maintained2022, the 15% reduction of the annual retainer paid to

non-management
directors that was implemented in 2016 to show alignment with management. During 2019, our
non-management
directors received:

an annuala retainer of $175,000;$75,000;
an additional annual fee of $20,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee;
an additional annual fee of $15,000 foror the chair of the Compensation Committee;
an additional annual fee of $10,000 for the chair of the Corporate Governance Committee;
an additional annual fee of $25,000 for the Lead Director; and
an additional annual fee of $125,000 for the
non-executive
chairman of the Board.
In 2019,
non-management
directors’ compensation included RSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $82,000. The RSUs are granted on the day following each Annual Meeting, with the number of RSUs granted determined by dividing $82,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the day of the Annual Meeting and rounding up to the next whole RSU. In addition, if the director’s initial election or appointment does not occur at an Annual Meeting, then he or she will receive a pro rata number of RSUs based on the number of full calendar months between the date of election or appointment and the first anniversary of the previous Annual Meeting.
The RSUs vest and pay out in shares of our common stock on the date of the next year’s Annual Meeting, subject to the applicable director’s continued service through the date and further subject to each director’s ability to elect to defer receipt of the shares of our common stock under the NQDC Plan.
Under our NQDC Plan,
non-management
directors may elect to defer compensation received from the Company for service on our Board. Deferred cash compensation will earn a rate of return based on hypothetical investments in certain mutual funds from which the director may select, or may be converted to deferred RSUs. Any deferred RSUs will be paid out in shares of our common stock and will be credited with dividend equivalents for any dividends paid on our common stock. Director participants may elect the timing of the distributions of their deferred compensation, which may be made in a lump sum payment or installments, provided that all payments are made no later than 10 years following the director’s termination of service on our Board.

The table below summarizes the compensation for the year ended 2022 for non-management directors (regardless of our

when earned). All non-management
directors for 2019. As CEO and President, Mr. Dunlap does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as an executive is reflected in the “Item 11. Executive Compensation—2019 Executive Compensation—2019 Summary Compensation Table.” All
non-management
directors arewere reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and Board committee meetings.
                 
Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash
(1)
  
Stock Awards
(2)
  
All Other
Compensation
  
Total
 
James M. Funk
 $
162,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
244,500
 
Terence E. Hall
 $
262,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
344,500
 
Peter D. Kinnear
 $
141,667
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
223,667
 
Janiece M. Longoria
 $
143,333
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
225,333
 
Michael M. McShane
 $
149,167
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
231,167
 
W. Matt Ralls
 $
152,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
234,500
 

Name

 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash

 

 

Stock
Awards

 

 

All Other
Compensation

 

 

Total

 

Joseph Citarrella (1)

 

$

75,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

75,000

 

Daniel E. Flores (2)

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

75,000

 

Julie J. Robertson

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

90,000

 

Krishna Shivram

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

95,000

 

Timothy J. Winfrey

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

75,000

 

(1)
(1)Amounts shown reflect fees earned by the directors as retainers or fees for their service on our Board during 2019.
(2)Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 at the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. On June 7, 2019, each
non-employee
director received an award of 50,000 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $1.64 per unit.
27Compensation paid to Monarch Alternative Capital LP, and not to named director individually.
(2)
Compensation paid to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and not to named director individually.

94


There were no additional equity awards to directors in 2022 given the multi-year vesting schedule of the 2021 grants which were intended to compensate the directors for a three year period of service. Director compensation is structured to attract and retain experienced and qualified directors. The compensation reflects the time commitment of the role as well as the qualifications of the directors.

Directors and Officers (“D&O”) insurance insures our individual directors and officers against certain losses that they are legally required to bear as a result of their actions while performing duties on our behalf. Our D&O insurance policy does not break out the premium for directors versus officers and, therefore, a dollar amount cannot be assigned to the coverage provided for individual directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(a) (1)

 

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b) (2)

 

 

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(c)

 

 Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

 

 

551,747

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,448,122

 

 Total

 

 

551,747

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,448,122

 

(1)
Includes all shares underlying RSU and PSU awards as of December 31, 2022.
(2)
All of our equity compensation plans have been previously approved by our stockholders. There are no securitiesThe weighted-average exercise price in column (b) does not take RSU or PSU awards into account.

Shares were issued under equity compensation plans that have not been previously approvedour MIP, discussed above. The Compensation Committee designates participants in the plan, determines the types of cash and share based awards authorized by our stockholders.

the plan to be issued to participants, and determines the terms of the individual forms of awards granted under the MIP, among other things. Pursuant to the MIP, the Compensation Committee is authorized to grant awards with respect to an aggregate of 1,999,869 shares of Class B Common Stock.

95


Table of Contents

Principal Stockholders

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stockClass A Common Stock beneficially owned by holders as of JuneMarch 1, 2020,2023 known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. stock as well as our directors and executive officers.

The information in the table is based on information provided to us by the entities listed below as well as our review of filings with the SEC.

         
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  
Percent of Class(1)
 
LJH, Ltd.
377 Neva Lane
Denison, Texas 750200019
  
2,382,000
(2)   
15.07
%
         
Warlander Asset Management, LP
250 West 55
th
Street, 33
rd
Floor
New York, New York 10019
  
1,099,999
(3)   
6.96
%
         
Monarch Alternative Capital LP
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
  
1,136,498
(4)   
7.19
%
         
Aristeia Capital, L.L.C.
One Greenwich Plaza, 3
rd
Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830
  
951,914
(5)   
6.02
%
         
Madison Avenue Partners, LP
150 East 58
th
Street, 14
th
Floor
New York, New York, 10155
  
793,858
(6)   
5.02
%
(1)Based on 15,798,919 shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 1, 2020.
(2)In the Schedule 13D/A filed on October 18, 2019, LJH, Ltd. reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(3)In the Schedule 13G filed on January 10, 2020, Warlander Asset Management, LP reported that it has the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the shared power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(4)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2020, The Monarch Alternative Capital LP reported that it has the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the shared power to vote or direct the vote of all shares reported.
(5)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2020, Aristeia Capital, L.L.C. reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(6)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2020, Madison Avenue Partners, LP reported that it has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
28

Management and Director Stock Ownership
The following table shows the number oftransfer agent. These stockholders acquired their shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with our common stock beneficially ownedemergence from bankruptcy discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We believe, based on information supplied by the stockholders, that except as of June 1, 2020, by our current (i)

 non-management
directors, (ii) NEOs, and (iii) directors and executive officers as a group. The informationmay otherwise be indicated in the footnotes to the table is based on our review of filings withbelow, the SEC. Each person listed below hasstockholders have sole voting and investmentdispositive power with respect to the shares of Class A Common Stock reported as beneficially owned unless otherwise stated.by them.

 

 

Class A Common Stock

 

 

Class B Common Stock

 

 

Combined

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Number

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Number

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Number

 

 

Percentage (3)

 

GoldenTree Asset Management LP (1)
300 Park Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10022

 

 

9,194,513

 

 

 

46.0

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,194,513

 

 

 

45.6

%

Monarch Energy Holdings (SE) LLC (2)
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

 

 

3,115,736

 

 

 

15.6

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,115,736

 

 

 

15.5

%

Glendon Capital Management, L.P. (3)
2425 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 500 E
Santa Monica, California 90404

 

 

1,804,808

 

 

 

9.0

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,804,808

 

 

 

9.0

%

Madison Avenue Partners, LP (4)
150 E. 58th Street, Suite 1403
New York, New York 10155

 

 

1,235,568

 

 

 

6.2

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,235,568

 

 

 

6.1

%

Joseph Citarrella

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Daniel E. Flores

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Julie J. Robertson

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,371

 

 

 

7.5

%

 

 

11,371

 

 

*

 

Krishna Shivram

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,078

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

 

11,078

 

 

*

 

Timothy J. Winfrey

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,673

 

 

 

9.7

%

 

 

14,673

 

 

*

 

Michael Y. McGovern

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

49,921

 

 

 

32.8

%

 

 

49,921

 

 

*

 

Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,313

 

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

11,313

 

 

*

 

James W. Spexarth

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,926

 

 

 

13.1

%

 

 

19,926

 

 

*

 

Michael J. Delahoussaye

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8,693

 

 

 

5.7

%

 

 

8,693

 

 

*

 

Bryan M. Ellis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,132

 

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

2,132

 

 

*

 

Deidre D. Toups

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,844

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

10,844

 

 

*

 

All directors and named executive officers as a group

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

139,951

 

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

139,951

 

 

 

0.7

%

(1)
Includes 9,194,513 shares of Class A Common Stock held by certain funds and accounts managed or advised by GoldenTree Asset Management LP. GoldenTree Asset Management LP has sole voting power and sole power of disposition with respect to 9,194,513 shares of Class A Common Stock.
         
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
(1)
  
Percent of
Class
(2)
 
NON-MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS
      
James M. Funk
  
28,734
   
*
 
Terence E. Hall
  
106,560
   
*
 
Peter D. Kinnear
  
67,746
   
*
 
Janiece M. Longoria
  
1,018
   
*
 
Michael M. McShane
  
115,763
   
*
 
W. Matt Ralls
  
7,286
   
*
 
         
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
      
David D. Dunlap
  
336,858
   
2.13
%
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
129,256
   
*
 
Brian K. Moore
  
203,759
   
1.29
%
A. Patrick Bernard
  
54,277
   
*
 
William B. Masters
  
63,533
   
*
 
James W. Spexarth
  
19,880
   
*
 
         
ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (12 Persons)
(3)
  
1,134670
   
7.18
%
(2)
Includes 3,115,736shares of Class A Common Stock held directly by Monarch Energy Holdings (SE) LLC. Monarch Energy Holdings (SE) LLC has sole voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 3,115,736 shares of Class A Common Stock.
(3)
Includes 1,804,808 shares of Class A Common Stock held by certain funds and accounts managed or advised by Glendon Capital Management, L.P.
(4)
Includes 1,235,568 shares of Class A Common Stock held by an account managed or advised by Madison Avenue Partners LP.
*Less than 1%.
(5)
Based on 19,998,695 shares of our Class A common stock and 152,030 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2023.
(1)Includes the number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Dunlap (199,808); Mr. Ballard (35,846); Mr. Moore (62,550); Mr. Bernard (42,082); Mr. Masters (41,415) and Mr. Spexarth (3,952). The total number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days for all directors and executive officers as a group is 385,653.
(2)Based on 15,798,919 shares of our common stock outstanding as of June1, 2020.
(3)Includes stock beneficially owned by all directors and executive officers.

Upon our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, all existing equity was cancelled and we issued the Class A Common Stock. As a result, our directors and executive officers are not currently beneficial owners of any shares of our outstanding Class A Common Stock. The address of directors and officers is in care of Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Transactions

Our practice has been that any transaction which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation

S-K
of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with respect to a director or executive officer, must be reviewed and approved by ourthe Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and investigates any matters pertaining

On the Emergence Date, in order to implement the integrity of our executive officers and directors, including conflicts of interest, or adherence to standards of business conduct required by our policies. We are currently not a party to any transactions requiring a disclosure.

Director Independence
The Board has also affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to the Audit and Compensation Committees) set forthgovernance related provisions reflected in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.
29
Plan, we entered into a Stockholders Agreement to provide for certain governance matters, which is further discussed in Item 10 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

96


Item 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered to KPMG LLPby our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the auditaudits of the Company’sour annual financial statements for 2019, 2018the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, and fees billed for other services rendered byrendered. Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) and for the year ended December 31, 2020 was KPMG LLP:

             
 
Fiscal Year Ended December 31
 
 
2019
  
2018
  
2017
 
Audit Fees(1)
 $
3,973,630
  $
3,254,470
  $
3,201,583
 
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 $
200,000
  $
0
  $
160,000
 
Tax Fees(3)
 $
25,827
  $
122,161
  $
170,735
 
All Other Fees
 $
0
  $
0
  $
0
 
LLP (“KPMG”). During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, KPMG provided audit services related to the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the recasting of our prior period financial statements for the presentation of assets held for sale and discontinued operations.

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Audit Fees (1)

 

$

2,700

 

 

$

3,100

 

 

$

1,895

 

 Audit-Related Fees (2)

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 Tax Fees (3)

 

 

241

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

8

 

 All Other Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

(1)
(1)Audit fees were for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements, for the audit of internal controls over financial reporting and for services normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Audit fees for professional services related to SEC filings for debt offering.
(3)Reflects fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning, statutory reporting and other international, federal and state projects.
Pre-Approval
Process
The Audit Committee must
pre-approve
all audit and permissible
non-audit
services provided by the independent auditor and follows established approval procedures to ensure that the independent auditor’s independence will not be impaired. If services require specific
pre-approval,
the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) submits requests along with a joint statement from the independent auditor as to whether, in the CAO’s view, the request for services is consistentnormally provided in connection with statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.SEC. Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2020 also include fees for the audit of internal controls over financial reporting.
The (2)
Audit Committee delegated
pre-approval
authorityfees for audit, audit-related,other attest related services.
(3)
Reflects fees for professional services rendered for tax servicescompliance, tax advice, tax planning, statutory reporting and other services that may be performed by the independent auditor in the
pre-approval
policy to its chairinternational, federal and any
pre-approval
decisions are presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibility to
pre-approve
services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditor.
All audit and tax fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee before services were rendered.state projects.
30

97


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents filed as part of this report.
1.
Financial Statements.

The financial statements and report of the independent registered public accounting firmfollowing documents have been included in Part II, Item 8 of ourthis Annual Report on Form

10-K
filed on February 28, 2020.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules.
10-K:

Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 185)

41

Consolidated Balance Sheets

42

Consolidated Statements of Operations

43

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

44

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

45

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

47

All financial statementother schedules have been included in Part IV, Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form

10-K
filed on February 28, 2020 oromitted because they are either inapplicable or not required or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements or Notesnotes thereto.
3.
Exhibits.
See Item 15(b) below. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed has been identified.
(b) Exhibits.

Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

Exhibit No.

Description

2.1

2.2

2.2

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.2

3.3

Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2021(File No. 001-34037)).

4.1

4.1

4.2

4.2

Indenture, dated December 6, 2011, among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011 (File No. 001-34037)), as amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated February 29, 2012, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 1, 2012 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated May 7, 2012, by and among SESI, L.L.C. the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 8, 2012 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 29, 2014, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto

31

and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2014 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 3, 2015, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 4,for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-34037))as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 17, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by

98


Table of Contents

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)) as further supplemented by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2020 by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2020 (File No. 001-34037)).

4.3

Indenture, dated August 17, 2017, among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)) as further supplemented by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2020 by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2020 (File No. 001-34037)).

4.3
Indenture, dated August 17, 2017, among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)).

4.4

4.4

10.1^

4.5
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
32

10.5
^

10.2^

10.6
^

10.3^

10.7
^

10.4^

10.8
^

10.5^

10.9
^

Superior Energy Services, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 001-34037)), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Superior Energy Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009 ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-34037)), as further amended by Amendment No. 2 to the Superior Energy Services, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of March 3, 2010 ((incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.6^

10.10
^

10.7^

10.11
^

10.8^

10.12
^

10.9^

10.13
^

10.10^

10.14
^

10.11^

10.15
^

10.12^

10.16
^
33

10.13^

10.17
^

10.14^

10.18
^

99


Table of Contents

10.15^

10.19
^

10.16^

10.20
^

10.17^

10.21
^

10.18^

10.22
^

10.19^

10.23
^

10.20^

10.24
^

10.21^

10.25
^

10.22^

10.26
^

10.23^

10.27
^

10.24^

Form of Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2020 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.25

10.28

10.26

Credit Agreement, dated September 25, 2018,as of February 2, 2021, among SESI Holdings, Inc., as parent, SESI, L.L.C., Superior Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party thereto,as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and the lenders from time to time party thereto (incorporated(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K filed October 23, 2018on February 3, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

34

10.27

001-34037)), as further amended by SecondFirst Amendment and Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restatedthe Credit Agreement dated September 20, 2019,by and among SESI, L.L.C., Superior Energy Services,SESI Holdings, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and thelender, and certain other financial institutions and other parties thereto as lenders party thereto (incorporated(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K filed November 6, 2019on May 18, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.28

Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2021, by and among SESI, L.L.C., SESI Holdings, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and lender, and certain other financial institutions and other parties thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.29

10.29

Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2021, by and among SESI, L.L.C., SESI Holdings, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and lender, and certain other financial institutions and other parties thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 21, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.30

10.31

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2022, by and among SESI, L.L.C., SESI Holdings, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and lender, and certain other financial institutions and other parties thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 11, 2022(File No. 001-34037)).

100


Table of Contents

10.32

Fourth Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2022 by and among SESI, L.L.C., SESI Holdings, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and lender, and certain other financial institutions and other parties there as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 14, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.33

Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2021, among Superior Energy Services, Inc., the other obligorseach stockholder who is deemed a party thereto pursuant to the Plan and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.any other stockholder who thereafter becomes a party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.34

First Amendment to the Stockholders Agreement by and among Superior Energy Services, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 14, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.35

Second Amendment to the Stockholders Agreement by and among Superior Energy Services, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2017June 14, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.36

10.30
^

10.37

Fourth Amendment to the Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2021, by and among Superior Energy Services, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 15, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.38

Fifth Amendment to the Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2022, by and among Superior Energy Services, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 11, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.39^

Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.40^

2021 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.41^

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award PlanAgreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.42^

Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.43^

Transition and Retirement Agreement between A. Patrick Bernard and Superior Energy Services, Inc., dated September 9, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.'s Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.44^

Waiver and Release, dated as of March 21, 2021, between Westervelt Ballard and Superior Energy Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021(File No. 001-34037)).

10.45^

Waiver and Release, dated as of March 22, 2021, between David D. Dunlap and Superior Energy Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021(File No. 001-34037)).

10.46^

Transition Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2021, between William B. Masters and Superior Energy Services, Inc.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.47^

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2021 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.48^

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2022, between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and James W. Spexarth (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2012for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.49^

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2022, between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Brian K. Moore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.50^

10.31
^

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2022 between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Mike Delahoussaye (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.51^

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2022 between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Deidre Toups (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

101


Table of Contents

10.52^

10.53^

Form of Employee Performance Stock Unit Award PlanAgreement (Applicable Corporate Transaction) (incorporated hereinby reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.54^

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Applicable Corporate Transaction) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.55^

Form of Employee Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (Applicable Corporate Transaction) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Superior Energy Services, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 31, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.56^

Executive Chairman Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2020on July 18, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

10.57^

Executive Chairman Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2022 (File No. 001-34037)).

14.1

14.1

16.1

21.1

21.1*

23.1

31.1*

31.1
31.2
31.3*

31.2*

31.4*

32.1*

32.1

32.2*

32.2

101.INS*

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

35

101.CAL*

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

104*

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline(embedded within the Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

document)

*Filed herewith.
Incorporated by reference into this Form
10-K/A
as indicated.
^Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
36

* Filed herein

^ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

102


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

Date: June 11, 2020

Date: March ___, 2023

By:

/s/ David. D. Dunlap

By:

David D. Dunlap

/s/ Brian K. Moore

Brian K. Moore

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title
Date

/

Signature

Title

Date

s/ David D. DunlapBrian K. Moore

President and Chief Executive Officer

June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

David D. Dunlap

     Brian K. Moore

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

James W. Spexarth.

     James W. Spexarth

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and& Treasurer

June 11, 2020
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ James W. Spexarth
Chief Accounting Officer
June 11, 2020
James W. Spexarth

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

March ___, 2023

/s/ Terence E. Hall

Michael Y. McGovern

Executive Chairman of the Board

June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

Terence E. Hall

     Michael Y. McGovern

/s/ James M. Funk

Joseph Citarrella

Director

Director
June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

James M. Funk

     Joseph Citarrella

/s/ Peter D. Kinnear

Daniel E. Flores

Director

Director
June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

Peter D. Kinnear

     Daniel E. Flores

/s/ Janiece M. Longoria

Julie J. Robertson

Director

Director
June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

Janiece M. Longoria

     Julie J. Robertson

/s/ Michael M. McShane

Krishna Shivram

Director

Director
June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

Michael M. McShane

     Krishna Shivram

/s/ W. Matt Ralls

Timothy J. Winfrey

Director

Director
June 11, 2020

March ___, 2023

W. Matt Ralls

     Timothy J. Winfrey

37

103