UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Form
10-K/A
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20212022
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
             to             
to
Commission file
number: 1-4717
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
Delaware
ksu-20221231_g1.jpg
87-3883291
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
427 West 12th Street
427 West 12th Street
Kansas City Missouri
,
Missouri
64105
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

816.983.1303
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Title of Each Class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Preferred Stock, Par Value $25 Per Share, 4%, Noncumulative
*
*
Common Stock, $.01 Per Share Par Value
*
*
*
See Explanatory Note
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  
ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  
ý
(Note: The registrant is a voluntary filer and is not subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, the registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  
ý    No  ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated FilerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated
filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
Large accelerated filer  ¨ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ý   Smaller reporting company  ☐ Emerging growth company  ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). Yes  ☐    No  
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
TheThere is no public trading market for the common stock of the registrant and therefore, an aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by
non-affiliates
of the registrant was $25.63 billion as of June 30, 2021.is not determinable. There were 100 shares of $.01 par common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2022.February 2, 2023, all of which were owned by Canadian Pacific Railway Limited.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s subsequent amendment to the Form 10-K to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2022 are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

None.


KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN
2022 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
Table of Contents
 


2

Item 1.Business
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Kansas City Southern, a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with domestic and international rail operations in North America that are strategically focused on the growing north/south freight corridor connecting key commercial and industrial markets in the central United States (“U.S.”) with major industrial cities in Mexico. As used herein, “KCS” or the “Company” may refer to Kansas City Southern or, as the context requires, to one or more subsidiaries of Kansas City Southern.
On September 15, 2021, KCS and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“CP”) entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”), and on December 14, 2021, CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS. Each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of KCS that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive (1) 2.884 common shares of CP and (2) $90 in cash (together, the “Merger Consideration”), and each share of preferred stock, par value $25 per share, that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive $37.50 in cash. The Merger Consideration value received by KCS stockholders was $301.20 per KCS common share.
The merger transaction was completed through a series of mergers as outlined in the Merger Agreement. These mergers ultimately resulted in KCS being merged with and into Cygnus Merger Sub 1 Corporation (“Surviving Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CP, with Surviving Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Surviving Merger Sub was renamed “Kansas City Southern” and as successor company of KCS, continued to own the assets of KCS. Immediately following the consummation of the mergers, CP caused the contribution, directly and indirectly, of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Surviving Merger Sub, as successor to KCS, to be deposited into an independent, irrevocable voting trust (the “Voting Trust”) under a voting trust agreement (the “Voting Trust Agreement”) approved by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), pending receipt of the final and non-appealable approval or exemption by the STB pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11323 et seq., of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (“STB Final Approval”). The Voting Trust prevents CP, or any affiliate of CP, from controlling or having the power to control KCS prior to STB Final Approval. Following receipt of STB Final Approval, the Voting Trust will be terminated and CP will acquire control over KCS’s railroad operations. STB Final Approval is expected to be granted in the first quarter of 2023. The merger is further discussed within Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of Operations — Merger Agreement.
KCS controls and owns all of the stock of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a U.S. Class I railroad founded in 1887. KCSR serves a ten-state region in the midwest and southeast regions of the United States and has the shortest north/south rail route between Kansas City, Missouri and several key ports along the Gulf of Mexico in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.
KCS controls and owns all of the stock of Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (“KCSM”). Through its 50-year concession from the Mexican government (the “Concession”), which could expire in 2047 unless extended, KCSM operates a key commercial corridor of the Mexican railroad system and has as its core route the most strategic portion of the shortest, most direct rail passageway between Mexico City and Laredo, Texas. Laredo is a principal international gateway through which a substantial portion of rail and truck traffic between the United States and Mexico crosses the border. KCSM serves most of Mexico’s principal industrial cities and three of its major seaports. KCSM’s rail lines provide exclusive rail access to the United States and Mexico border crossing at Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas. Under the Concession, KCSM has the right to use and operate the southern half of the rail bridge at Laredo, Texas, which spans the Rio Grande River between the United States and Mexico. The Company owns the northern half of this bridge through its ownership of Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”).
KCSM also provides exclusive rail access to the Port of Lazaro Cardenas on the Pacific Ocean. The Mexican government developed the port at Lazaro Cardenas principally to serve Mexican markets and as an alternative to the U.S. west coast ports for Asian and South American traffic bound for North America.
The Company wholly owns Mexrail which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”). Tex-Mex owns a 160-mile rail line extending from Laredo, Texas to the port city of Corpus Christi, Texas, which connects the operations of KCSR with KCSM.

3

The KCS coordinated rail network (KCSR, KCSM and Tex-Mex, including trackage rights) comprises approximately 7,100 route miles extending from the midwest and southeast portions of the United States south into Mexico and connects with all other Class I railroads, providing shippers with an effective alternative to other railroad routes and giving direct access to Mexico and the southeast and southwest United States through alternate interchange hubs.
Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), an unconsolidated joint venture company owned equally by KCS and Mi-Jack Products, Inc. (“Mi-Jack”), was awarded a concession from the Republic of Panama to reconstruct and operate the Panama Canal Railway, a 47-mile railroad located adjacent to the Panama Canal that provides international container shipping companies with a railway transportation alternative to the Panama Canal. The concession was awarded in 1998 for an initial term of 25 years with an automatic renewal for an additional 25-year term. The Panama Canal Railway is a north-south railroad traversing the isthmus of Panama between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Other subsidiaries and affiliates of KCS include the following:
Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a seventy percent-owned consolidated affiliate that owns the former KCSR rail line between Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport, Louisiana, which is the portion of the rail line between Dallas, Texas and Meridian known as the “Meridian Speedway.” Norfolk Southern Corporation, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, owns the remaining thirty percent of MSLLC;
TFCM, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“TCM”), a forty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that operates a bulk liquid terminal in San Luis Potosí, Mexico;
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary services in the greater Mexico City area; and
PTC-220, LLC (“PTC-220”), a thirteen percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that holds the licenses to large blocks of radio spectrum and other assets for Positive Train Control (“PTC”). See Government Regulation section for further information regarding PTC.

MARKETS SERVED

2022 Revenues
Business Mix
Chemical and petroleum. This commodity group includes products such as chemicals, plastics, petroleum, liquefied petroleum gas, and petroleum refined products, such as gasoline and diesel. KCS transports these products across its network and through interchanges with other rail carriers. Refined fuels and liquefied petroleum gas groups of commodities primarily supply Mexican demand. The chemical and plastic products are used in the automotive, housing and packaging industries as well as in general manufacturing. KCS hauls petroleum products across its network and as U.S. petroleum refineries have continued to increase their refining capacity, they have coordinated with KCS to develop additional long-term storage opportunities that complement a fluid freight railroad operation.
ksu-20221231_g2.jpg
Industrial and consumer products. This commodity group includes forest products as well as metals and scrap. Forest products consist of shipments to and from paper and lumber mills in the southeast United States timber-producing region that KCS serves directly and indirectly through its various short-line connections. The United States is an important source of pulp paper and scrap paper for Mexico that ships by rail through KCS’s network.Metals and scrap consist of shipments of flat steel and long product as well as other minor moves of ores such as iron, zinc and copper. The majority of steel produced and metallic ore mined in Mexico are consumed within Mexico. Steel slab is used to make steel coils and plate-products that usually

4

ship via rail. Higher-end finished products such as steel coils are used by Mexican manufacturers in automobiles, household appliances, the oil and gas industry, and other consumer goods that are imported from the United States through land borders and the seaports served by KCS’s rail network. KCS also transports steel coils, plates and pipe from U.S. and Mexican-based mini-mills to locations in the U.S. and Mexico for oil drilling, appliance and automotive applications. This commodity group also includes U.S. military transports, Mexico and U.S. domestic cement shipments and appliances manufactured in Mexico that are imported into the United States.
Agriculture and minerals. The agriculture and minerals commodity group consists primarily of grain and food products. Shipper demand for agriculture products is affected by competition among sources of grain and grain products, as well as price fluctuations in international markets for key commodities. In the United States, KCS’s rail lines receive and originate shipments of grain and grain products for delivery to feed mills and food and industrial consumers in the U.S. and Mexico. United States export grain shipments and Mexico import grain shipments include primarily corn, wheat, and soybeans. Food products consist mainly of soybean meal, grain meal, oils, distillers dried grains, corn syrup and sugar. Other shipments consist of a variety of products including ores, minerals, clay and glass used across North America.
Energy. The energy commodity group includes coal, frac sand, petroleum coke and crude oil. KCS hauls unit trains (trains transporting a single commodity from one source to one destination) of coal for electric generating plants in the central United States. The coal originates from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and is interchanged to KCS at Kansas City, Missouri. Coal mined in the midwest United States is transported in non-unit trains to industrial consumers such as paper mills, steel mills, and cement companies. Frac sand originating primarily in Wisconsin, Illinois or Iowa is delivered to transloads located in northeast Texas, northern Louisiana and south Texas for distribution to gas and oil wells in the region. Frac sand business in Mexico is primarily for industrial purposes such as auto glass and bottle manufacturing. KCS’s shipments of frac sand to support the drilling industry have diminished over time as the use of in-basin frac sand has largely replaced frac sand originating in the upper Midwest. KCS transports petroleum coke from refineries in the United States to various industries in the U.S. and Mexico including export through the Pabtex terminal located in Port Arthur, TX. The majority of crude by rail business originates in Canada, with spot shipments coming from Texas, and is delivered to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries and tank farms in Texas, Louisiana, and Alabama.
Intermodal. The intermodal freight sector consists primarily of hauling freight containers or truck trailers on behalf of steamship lines, motor carriers, and intermodal marketing companies with rail carriers serving as long-distance haulers. KCS serves and supports the U.S. and Mexican markets, as well as cross-border traffic between the U.S. and Mexico. In light of the importance of trade between Asia and North America, the Company believes the Port of Lazaro Cardenas continues to be a strategically beneficial location for ocean carriers, manufacturers and retailers. Equally important, foreign direct investment in Mexico has caused the KCS Mexico/U.S. cross border corridor to emerge as an increasingly important tool for freight flow. The Company also provides premium service to customers over its line from Dallas through the Meridian Speedway— a critical link in creating the most direct route between the southwest and southeast/northeast U.S.
Automotive. KCS provides rail transportation to every facet of the automotive industry supply chain, including automotive manufacturers, assembly plants and distribution centers throughout North America. In addition, KCS transports finished vehicles imported and exported to and from various countries through a distribution facility at the Port of Lazaro Cardenas.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company’s United States operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations generally applicable to all businesses, subject to federal preemption under certain circumstances. Rail operations are also subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the STB, the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) of the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies. The STB has jurisdiction over disputes and complaints involving certain rates and charges, routes and services, the sale or abandonment of rail lines, applications for line extensions and construction, and consolidation or merger with, or acquisition of control of, rail common carriers, including the Company’s merger with CP. DOT and OSHA each has jurisdiction under several federal statutes over a number of safety and health aspects of rail operations, including the transportation of hazardous materials.
The Company operates PTC on all required sections of its U.S. rail network, locomotives, and wayside assets and is fully interoperable with the required Class I freight railroads and Amtrak. PTC is a technology designed to help prevent train-to-train

5

collisions, overspeed derailments, incursions into rail work zones, and entry to main line track if a switch is misaligned at certain locations, including main line track where toxic inhalation hazard or poison inhalation hazard movements occur or where passenger operations occur. The implementation of PTC from 2008 through 2020 has increased operating costs and the number of Company employees, and required a significant investment in new safety technology. The Company will continue to leverage PTC technology and make investments in new safety technology to improve operations and safety of the rail network.
KCS’s U.S. subsidiaries are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulations. These laws cover discharges to water, air emissions, toxic substances, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous materials. These regulations have the effect of increasing the costs, risks and liabilities associated with rail operations. Environmental risks are also inherent in rail operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Primary regulatory oversight of the Company’s Mexican operations is provided by the Mexican Agencia Reguladora del Transporte Ferroviario (“Regulatory Agency of Rail Transportation” or “ARTF”). The ARTF establishes regulations concerning railway safety and operations, and is responsible for resolving disputes between railways and customers. KCSM must register its maximum rates with the ARTF and make regular reports to the ARTF and the Secretaría de Infraestructura, Comunicaciones y Transportes (“Ministry of Infrastructure, Communications and Transportation” or “SICT”). KCSM must provide reports on investments, traffic volumes, causes and cost of accidents, theft and vandalism on the general right of way, customer complaints, fuel consumption, number of locomotives, railcars and employees, and activities around the maintenance of way, sidings and spurs, among other financial information and reports. The Company may freely set rates on a non-discriminatory basis up to the maximum rates registered with the ARTF. At any time, the ARTF may request additional information regarding the determination of such rates and may issue recommendations with respect to proposed rate increases. If the ARTF or another party considers there to be no effective competition, they may request an opinion from the Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica (“Mexican Antitrust Commission” or “COFECE”) regarding market conditions. If the COFECE determines that there is no effective competition for particular movements, the ARTF could set rates for those movements or grant limited trackage rights to another railroad while the condition of no effective competition remains.
KCSM holds a Concession from the Mexican government until June 2047, subject to certain trackage and haulage rights granted to other concessionaires), which is renewable under certain conditions for additional periods of up to 50 years. The Concession authorizes KCSM to provide freight transportation services over north-east rail lines, which are a primary commercial corridor of the Mexican railroad system. KCSM is required to provide freight railroad services to all users on a fair and non-discriminatory basis and in accordance with efficiency and safety standards approved periodically by the Mexican government. KCSM has the right to use, but does not own, all tracks and buildings that are necessary for the rail lines’ operation. KCSM is obligated to maintain the right of way, track structure, buildings and related maintenance facilities to the operational standards specified in the Concession agreement and to return the assets in that condition at the end of the Concession period. During the remainder of the Concession period, KCSM is required to pay the Mexican government an annual concession duty equal to 1.25% of gross revenues. The ARTF may request information to verify KCSM´s compliance with the Concession and any applicable regulatory framework. On July 14, 2022, KCSM reached an agreement with the SICT to fund a new investment in the Celaya-NBA Line Railway Bypass and related infrastructure in an amount not to exceed Ps.4.0 billion (approximately $200.0 million USD). In exchange for the investment, the SICT agreed to amend KCSM’s Concession Title effective July 14, 2022, to extend the exclusivity rights granted to KCSM (subject to certain trackage and haulage rights granted to other concessionaires) for an additional period of 10 years. Under this amendment, KCSM’s exclusivity will now expire in 2037.
The Company’s Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment through the establishment of standards for water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. The Mexican government may bring administrative and criminal proceedings and impose economic sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or even permanently close non-complying facilities.
Noncompliance with applicable legal provisions may result in the imposition of fines, temporary or permanent shutdown of operations or other injunctive relief, criminal prosecution or, with respect to KCSM, the termination of the Concession. KCS maintains environmental provisions that are believed by management to be appropriate with respect to known and existing environmental contamination of its properties that KCS may be responsible to remedy.

6

Government regulations are further discussed within Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of Operations — Mexico Regulatory and Legal Updates.
COMPETITION
The Company competes against other railroads, many of which are much larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources. The railroad industry in North America is dominated by a few very large carriers. The larger U.S. western railroads (BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company), in particular, are significant competitors of KCS because of their substantial resources and competitive routes.
In Mexico, KCSM’s operations are subject to competition from other railroads, particularly Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferromex”) and Ferrosur, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferrosur”), both controlled by Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V. Ferromex and Ferrosur together are much larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources than KCSM, serving most of the major ports and cities in Mexico and together owning fifty percent of FTVM, which serves industries located in the Mexico City area.
The Company is subject to competition from motor carriers, barge lines and other maritime shipping, which compete across certain routes in KCS’s operating areas. In the past, truck carriers have generally eroded the railroad industry’s share of total transportation revenues. Intermodal traffic and certain other traffic face highly price sensitive competition, particularly from motor carriers. However, moving freight by train instead of truck reduces greenhouse gas emissions by up to 75%. Rail carriers, including KCS, have placed an emphasis on improving fuel efficiency and competing in the intermodal marketplace to regain market share and provide end-to-end transportation of products.
While deregulation of U.S. freight rates has enhanced the ability of railroads to compete with each other and with alternative modes of transportation, this increased competition has generally resulted in downward pressure on freight rates since deregulation. Competition with other railroads and other modes of transportation is generally based on the rates charged, the quality and reliability of the service provided and the quality of the carrier’s equipment for certain commodities.
RAIL SECURITY
The Company and its rail subsidiaries have continued to research, develop and implement multidisciplinary approaches to secure the Company’s assets and personnel against transnational criminal organizations that actively target transportation networks. In addition, the Company has developed a variety of vertically integrated strategies to mitigate the risk terrorist attacks could pose to the Company, its personnel and assets. Many of the specific measures the Company utilizes for these efforts are required to be kept confidential through arrangements with government agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), or through jointly-developed and implemented strategies and plans with connecting carriers.
KCSR and KCSM developed a proprietary security plan based on an industry-wide plan developed by the Association of American Railroads (“AAR”) members which focuses on comprehensive risk assessments in five areas — hazardous materials; train operations; critical physical assets; military traffic; and information technology and communications. The security model is kept confidential, with access to the plan tightly limited to members of management with direct security and anti-terrorism implementation responsibilities. The Company participates with other AAR members in periodic drills under the industry plan to test and refine its various provisions.
The Company also uses various forms of technology in its operations. The risks associated with this technology from cyber attacks has increased in recent years. The Company continues to monitor these threats and attempted cyber attacks, and has put in place multi-layered safeguards to protect the Company’s operations as well as its assets and digital information from cyber attacks.
To protect the confidentiality and sensitivity of both the AAR plans and the proprietary strategies the Company has developed to safeguard against criminal enterprises, terrorism, and other security and safety threats, the following paragraphs will provide only a general overview of some of these efforts.
The Company’s security activities range from constant due diligence to providing security awareness updates to KCS employees and including safety and security information on the Company’s internet website (which can be found under the “Corporate Responsibility” tab at www.kcsouthern.com) to its ongoing implementation of security plans for rail facilities in areas labeled by the DHS as High Threat Urban Areas (“HTUAs”). The Company’s other activities to bolster security against terrorism include, but are not limited to, the following:

7

Conferring regularly with other railroads’ security personnel and with industry experts on security issues;
Routing shipments of certain chemicals, which might be toxic if inhaled, pursuant to federal regulations;
Initiating a series of over 20 voluntary action items agreed to between AAR and DHS as enhancing security in the rail industry;
Conducting constant and targeted security training as part of the scheduled training for operating employees and managers;
Developing sophisticated smartphone applications to ensure information, such as live video and pictures, is captured pertaining to potential operational risks and delivered timely to security supervisors;
Developing a multi-layered security model using high-speed digital imaging, system velocity and covert and overt security filters to mitigate the risk of illicit activity;
Measuring key security metrics to ensure positive risk mitigation and product integrity trends;
Performing constant due diligence with the existing security model and by benchmarking rail security, including cyber security, on a world-wide basis to monitor threat streams related to rail incidents;
Implementing a Tactical Intelligence Center by KCSM, which provides constant training with new technology, helping to prevent, detect, deter, deny and respond to potentially illicit activities; and
Deploying an array of non-intrusive technologies including, but not limited to, digital video surveillance and analytics as part of an intelligent video security solution, including a closed-circuit television platform with geo-fencing for intrusion detection, to allow for remote viewing access to monitor ports of entry, intermodal and rail yards.
In addition, the Company utilizes dedicated security personnel with extensive special operations forces, intelligence, and law enforcement backgrounds to oversee the ongoing and increasingly complex security efforts of the Company in both the United States and Mexico. While the risk of theft and vandalism is higher in Mexico, KCSM remains among the safest methods of transportation for freight shipments in Mexico. KCSM’s record in rail safety is due in large part to the implementation of a multi-layered safety and security process throughout the KCSM network. In addition to having its own internal system, the process is connected to, and supported by a high level of federal, state and local law enforcement. A primary focus of this effort involves maintaining constant diligence, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, technology-reporting applications and active vigilance while enhancing overall system velocity, which reduces the residual risk for incidents to occur.
RAILWAY LABOR ACT
Labor relations in the U.S. railroad industry are subject to extensive governmental regulation under the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”). Under the RLA, national labor agreements are renegotiated on an industry-wide scale when they become open for modification, but their terms remain in effect until new agreements are reached or the RLA’s procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods, and the possibility of presidential intervention) are exhausted. Contract negotiations with the various unions generally take place over an extended period of time and the Company rarely experiences work stoppages during negotiations. Wages, health and welfare benefits, work rules and other issues have traditionally been addressed during these negotiations.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
Approximately 71% of KCSR employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements do not have expiration dates, but rather remain in place until modified by subsequent agreements. KCSR participates in industry-wide multi-employer bargaining as a member of the National Carriers’ Conference Committee (the “NCCC”), as well as local bargaining for agreements that are limited to KCSR's property. For the 2016 bargaining round, 5-year agreements were reached voluntarily or through the arbitration process during 2017 and 2018 covering all of the participating unions. The terms of these agreements remained in effect until new agreements were reached in the 2020 national bargaining round. In November 2019, KCSR and its unions commenced negotiations in connection with the 2020 collective bargaining round. During 2022, 5-year agreements were reached voluntarily or through the legislation process covering all of the participating U.S. unions for the 2020 national bargaining round.
KCSM union employees are covered by one labor agreement, which was signed on April 16, 2012, between KCSM Servicios, S.A. de C.V. (“KCSM Servicios”), previously a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS that was merged into KCSM in 2021, and the Sindicato de Trabajadores Ferrocarrileros de la República Mexicana (“Mexican Railroad Union”). This existing

8

labor agreement remains in effect during the period of the Concession for the purpose of regulating the relationship between the parties. Approximately 76% of KCSM employees are covered by this labor agreement. The compensation terms under this labor agreement are subject to renegotiation on an annual basis and all other benefits are subject to negotiation every two years. The parties finalized negotiations over compensation terms and benefits that applied until June 30, 2021, along with other terms, and remain in effect until new terms have been negotiated.
Union labor negotiations have not historically resulted in any strike, boycott or other disruption in the Company’s business operations.
INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
All executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. All of the executive officers have employment agreements with KCS and/or its subsidiaries.
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer — President and Chief Executive Officer— 65 — Served in this capacity since July 1, 2016. Mr. Ottensmeyer has been a director of KCS since July 1, 2016 and served as President of KCS since March 1, 2015. He served as Executive Vice President Sales and Marketing of KCS from October 16, 2008 through March 1, 2015. Mr. Ottensmeyer joined KCS in May 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Warren K. Erdman — Executive Vice President — Administration and Corporate Affairs — 64 — Served in this capacity since April 2010. Mr. Erdman served as Executive Vice President — Corporate Affairs from October 2007 until April 2010. He served as Senior Vice President — Corporate Affairs of KCS and KCSR from January 2006 to September 2007. Mr. Erdman served as Vice President — Corporate Affairs of KCS from April 15, 1997 to December 31, 2005 and as Vice President — Corporate Affairs of KCSR from May 1997 to December 31, 2005. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Erdman served as Chief of Staff to United States Senator Kit Bond of Missouri from 1987 to 1997.
Jeffrey M. Songer — Executive Vice President — Strategic Merger Planning — 53 — Served in this capacity since April 16, 2021. Mr. Songer served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from March 2016 to April 2021, Senior Vice President Engineering and Chief Transportation Officer of the Company from August 2014 to February 2016 and as Vice President and Chief Engineer for KCSR from June 2012 to July 2014. Prior to serving as KCSR’s Vice President and Chief Engineer, Mr. Songer served as Assistant Vice President — Engineering and Planning from March 2011 to June 2012, and as its General Director — Planning, Scheduling & Administration from January 2007 to March 2011.
John F. Orr- Executive Vice President — Operations — 59 — Served in this capacity since April 16, 2021. Mr. Orr began his railroading career in 1984 as a conductor with Canadian National in London, Ontario. Progressively taking on positions of increasing executive responsibilities across Canada and the United States, Mr. Orr ultimately completed his career at Canadian National as Senior Vice President and Chief Transportation Officer after 34 years of service. Since 2019, he has worked as a top-level operations executive in railroading and transportation ecosystems across Europe, Asia, and North America.
Michael W. Upchurch — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — 62 — Served in this capacity since October 16, 2008. Mr. Upchurch joined KCS in March 2008 as Senior Vice President Purchasing and Financial Management. Since 2019, Mr. Upchurch has also served as a board member for WillScot Mobile Mini. From 1990 through September 2006, Mr. Upchurch served in various senior financial leadership positions at Sprint Corporation, a telecommunications company, including Senior Vice President Financial Operations, Senior Vice President Finance Sprint Business Solutions and Senior Vice President Finance Long Distance Division.
Oscar Augusto Del Cueto Cuevas — President, General Manager and Executive Representative — KCSM — 56 — Served in this capacity since August 1, 2020. Mr. Del Cueto previously served as KCSM Servicios Vice President and General Director from November 2018 to July 2020 and as KCSM Servicios Vice President-Operations from January 2009 to October 2018. Mr. Del Cueto joined KCSM in 2006 and held various leadership positions prior to 2009. He has over 32 years of railway industry experience, working in institutional relations, communication, operations, planning and logistics.
Lora S. Cheatum Senior Vice President —Human Resources — 66 — Served in this capacity since joining KCS in October 2014. Ms. Cheatum previously served as Senior Vice President Global Human Resources of Layne Christensen Company, a global water management, construction, and drilling company, from 2012 to October 2014. From 2010 to 2012, she served as Director — Field Operations at Fitness Together Holdings, Inc. Ms. Cheatum spent nine years with Kansas City Power & Light, from 2001 to 2010, where she was Vice President of Procurement and previously as Vice President Human Resources.

9

Michael J. Naatz — Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer — 57 — Served in this capacity since October 1, 2018. Mr. Naatz served as Senior Vice President Operations Support and Chief Information Officer from August 2014 until September 2018 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Company from May 2012 to July 2014. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Naatz served as President of USF Holland, a YRC Worldwide, Inc. (“YRCW”) company, a leading provider of transportation and global logistics services, from 2011 to May 2012. From 2010 to 2011, Mr. Naatz served as President and Chief Customer Officer - Customer Care Division at YRCW. From 2008 to 2010, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information & Service Officer at YRCW. From 2005 to 2007, he served as President — Enterprise Services Division at YRCW. From 1994 to 2005, he held various leadership positions with USF Corporation.
Suzanne M. Grafton — Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer — 47 — Served in this capacity since July 24, 2017. Ms. Grafton served as Vice President of Audit and Enterprise Risk Management of the Company from April 2016 to July 2017 and as Vice President of Accounting from May 2014 to March 2016. From September 2006 to May 2014, Ms. Grafton served in various accounting leadership positions at KCS.
Adam J. Godderz — Senior Vice President — Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary — 48 — Served in this capacity since February 1, 2020. Mr. Godderz served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from January 2019 to January 2020 and as Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company from June 2018 to December 2018. From November 2015 to May 2018, he served as Vice President of Labor Relations and Corporate Secretary. From January 2013 to November 2015, Mr. Godderz served as Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.  From September 2007 to January 2013, Mr. Godderz served as Associate General Counsel at KCS.
DESCRIPTION OF HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had approximately 7,190 employees, with 57% based in Mexico and 43% based in the U.S. In 2022, approximately 74% of KCS employees were represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
ksu-20221231_g3.jpgksu-20221231_g4.jpg

In managing the Company’s business, management focuses on a number of human capital measures and objectives rooted in the KCS Vision, Values and Culture (“KCS Culture”). The KCS Culture is critically important to KCS’s success and is a set of guidelines, beliefs and behaviors that help define KCS and create a foundation for growth and success. The KCS Culture helps guide how employees make decisions, treat each other and serve customers. All employees are responsible for upholding the KCS Culture and conformance with the KCS Culture statement is 25% of the annual performance appraisal process for all management employees. Management uses performance evaluations as a tool to help strengthen relationships with employees and KCS’s Culture.

10

Employee Health & Safety- KCS is committed to operating in a safe, secure and responsible manner for the benefit of its employees, customers and the communities KCS serves in the U.S. and Mexico. See below for further discussion of employee health and safety as well as noted in the Company’s sustainability report at https://www.kcsouthern.com/pdf/community/kcs-sustainability-data-2021.pdf (the sustainability report is not incorporated into this Form 10-K).
Compensation and Benefits - KCS strives to offer competitive compensation, benefits and services that meet the needs of its employees, including short and long-term incentive packages, a defined contribution plan, healthcare benefits, and wellness and employee assistance programs. Management monitors market compensation and benefits to be able to attract, retain, and promote employees and reduce turnover and its associated costs. In addition, KCS’s short and long-term incentive programs are aligned with the Company’s vision and key business objectives and are intended to motivate strong performance. KCS engages a nationally recognized outside consulting firm to objectively evaluate its compensation and benefits and benchmark them against industry peers and other similarly situated organizations.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, compensation and benefits expense totaled $567.0 million. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion of compensation and benefits expense.
Auditor Name: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPAuditor Location: Kansas City, MissouriPCAOB ID Number: 238
Employee Health and Safety Overview
KCS is subject to federal, state, and local government regulations in the U.S. and Mexico with regard to safety. These regulations direct safety practices in the placement of rail cars carrying certain commodities in the train, routes, inspection of equipment and track, security procedures, equipment design and construction, speed restrictions, and work rules.
Management strives to instill a culture of safety, providing on-the-job training and classroom instruction to employees. Many positions, such as locomotive engineers and conductors, have extensive requirements for certification and licensing, as required by federal regulation. Certification-eligibility is based on a variety of factors, including prior safety conduct of the applicant, compliance with applicable regulations, knowledge of operating rules and performance testing. The Company offers certification and training programs to operations groups as business needs require. These training programs focus on operating rules, safety rules, and procedures required for specific tasks.
KCS’s operational testing program provides processes for ongoing validation and understanding of, and adherence to operating rules and procedures by employees, and allows management to identify, monitor and manage potential safety risks in the business. This training is designed to gauge employees’ knowledge of and compliance with KCS rules and procedures and determine the need for remedial training or guidance. Testing plans are developed based upon, among other things, a particular location’s risks, recent trends, injuries or accidents and prior operational test performance.
KCS uses advanced technologies to help employees enhance operational safety including the use of technology to monitor, in real time the track, bridges and tunnels that KCS uses in its operations. The Company has invested $277.9 million in PTC since 2008, which aims to prevent train-to-train collisions, derailments caused by excessive train speed, train movements through misaligned track switch and unauthorized train entry into work zones.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
KCS’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, are available for download at no cost on KCS’s website (www.investors.kcsouthern.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after the electronic filing of these reports is made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, KCS’s corporate governance guidelines, ethics and legal compliance policy, and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Finance and Strategic Investments Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of Directors are available on KCS’s website.
See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, Description of the Business and Note 18, Geographic Information for more information on the description and general development of the Company’s business and financial information about geographic areas.


11

Explanatory NoteTable of Contents
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Risks Related to KCS’s Operations and Business
Public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.
The Company may face risks related to public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases. A widespread healthcare crisis, such as an outbreak of a communicable disease, could adversely affect the global economy and the Company’s and its business partners’ ability to conduct business in the U.S. and Mexico for an indefinite period of time. The novel coronavirus and its variants (“COVID-19”) negatively impacted the global economy and disrupted financial markets and international trade, which resulted in increased unemployment levels and significantly negatively impacted global supply chains, the rail transportation industry, and the Company’s business. In both the U.S. and Mexico, local, state, and federal governments implemented various measures in an effort to halt the further spread of COVID-19, including, but not limited to, voluntary and mandatory quarantines, stay-at-home orders, travel restrictions, border closings, limitations on gatherings of people, and extended closures of nonessential businesses.
COVID-19 has caused and may continue to cause decreased customer demand for the Company’s transportation services, increased costs as a result of the Company’s emergency measures, delayed payments from customers, delays and disruptions in supply chain, and other unpredictable events. Other future public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases may have these same or similar consequences.
The future impacts of COVID-19, other public health threats or outbreaks of communicable disease depend on the severity, magnitude and duration of the outbreak, as well as the U.S., Mexico, local, state and federal governments and the business community’s response. The ultimate impact of COVID-19, other public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases on the Company’s business or operating and financial results are difficult to predict with any degree of certainty.
Capacity constraints could materially adversely affect service and operating efficiency.
KCS may experience capacity constraints due to increased demand for rail services, unavailability of equipment, crew shortages, or extreme weather. Also, due to the interconnectivity between all railroads, especially in the U.S., congestion on other railroads could result in operational inefficiencies for KCS. Traffic congestion experienced in the U.S. or Mexican railroad system may result in overall traffic congestion which would impact the ability to move traffic to and from Mexico, which could result in operational inefficiencies for KCS and could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s operations.
Significant expansions in the capacity of the Company’s network can require a substantial amount of time and investment. Although KCS constantly monitors its network in an effort to optimize its rail services, there can be no assurance that such measures will adequately address capacity constraints on a timely basis.
KCS competes against other railroads and other transportation providers.
The Company’s domestic and international operations are subject to competition from other railroads, as well as from truck carriers, barge lines, and other maritime shippers. Many of KCS’s rail competitors are much larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources than KCS, which may enable rail competitors to reduce rates and make KCS’s freight services less competitive. KCS’s ability to respond to competitive pressures by matching rate reductions and decreasing rates without adversely affecting gross margins and operating results will depend on, among other things, the ability to reduce operating costs. KCS’s failure to respond to competitive pressures, and particularly rate competition, in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The railroad industry is dominated by a few large carriers. These larger railroads could attempt to use their size and pricing power to block other railroads’ access to gateways and routing options that are currently and have historically been available. In addition, if there is future consolidation in the railroad industry in the United States or Mexico, there can be no assurance that it will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Trucking, maritime, and barge competitors provide rate and service competition to the railroad industry. These competitors are able to use public rights-of-way, require substantially smaller capital investment and maintenance expenditures than railroads and allow for more frequent and flexible scheduling. Continuing competitive pressures, any reduction in margins due to competitive pressures, developments that increase the quality or decrease the cost of alternative modes of transportation

12

in the locations in which the Company operates, or legislation or regulations that provide motor carriers with additional advantages, such as increased size of vehicles and reduced weight restrictions, could result in downward pressure on freight rates, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. KCS may also experience operational or service difficulties related to network capacity, fluctuations in customers’ demand for rail service, or other events that could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
A key part of KCS’s growth strategy is based upon the conversion of truck traffic to rail. There can be no assurance the Company will succeed in its efforts to convert traffic from truck to rail transport or that the customers already converted will be retained. If the railroad industry in general is unable to preserve its competitive advantages vis-à-vis the trucking industry, revenue growth could be adversely affected. Additionally, revenue growth could be affected by, among other factors, an expansion in the availability, or an improvement in the quality, of the trucking services offered by carriers resulting from regulatory and administrative interpretations and implementation of certain provisions of current or future multinational trade agreements that are favorable to the trucking industry or unfavorable to the rail industry or KCS. Such actions may negatively impact KCS’s ability to grow its existing customer base and capture additional cargo transport market share because of competition from the shipping industry and other railroads.
KCS’s business strategy, operations and growth rely significantly on agreements with other railroads and third parties.
Operation of KCS’s rail network and its plans for growth and expansion rely significantly on agreements with other railroads and third parties, including joint ventures and other strategic alliances, as well as interchange, trackage rights, haulage rights and marketing agreements with other railroads and third parties that enable KCS to exchange traffic and utilize trackage the Company does not own. KCS’s ability to provide comprehensive rail service to its customers depends in large part upon its ability to maintain these agreements with other railroads and third parties, and upon the performance of the obligations under the agreements by the other railroads and third parties. The termination of, or the failure to renew, these agreements could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. KCS is also dependent in part upon the financial strength and efficient performance of other railroads. There can be no assurance that KCS would not be materially adversely affected by operational or financial difficulties of other railroads.
KCS depends on the stability, availability and security of its information technology systems to operate its business. Disruptions in KCS’s information technology (“IT”) systems could materially adversely affect the Company’s business and operating results.
KCS relies on information technology in all aspects of its business, including operating PTC, dispatching trains, and the revenue waybill system. A significant disruption or failure of its IT systems, including its computer hardware, software, communications equipment, wayside equipment or locomotive onboard equipment could result in service interruptions, safety failures, security failures, regulatory compliance failures or other operational difficulties. Moreover, if KCS is not able to acquire new technology or to develop or implement new technology, KCS may suffer a competitive disadvantage, which could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The security risks associated with IT systems have increased in recent years because of the increased sophistication, activities and evolving techniques of perpetrators of cyber attacks from state actor or others abroad. A failure in, or breach of, KCS’s IT security systems, or those of its third party service providers, as a result of cyber attacks or unauthorized access to its network could disrupt KCS’s business, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, increase its costs and/or cause losses and reputational damage. KCS also confronts the risk that a terrorist or nation-state sponsored group may seek to use its property, including KCS’s information technology systems, to inflict major harm.
Although KCS has a comprehensive cyber security program designed to protect and preserve the integrity of its information technology systems, KCS has experienced and expects to continue to experience cyber attacks of its IT systems or networks. However, none of these cyber attacks to date has had a material impact on KCS’s operations or financial condition. While KCS devotes significant resources to network security, data encryption and other security measures to protect its systems and data, including its own proprietary information and the confidential and personally identifiable information of its customers, employees, and business partners, these measures cannot provide absolute security. The costs to eliminate or alleviate network security problems, bugs, viruses, ransomware, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and KCS’s efforts to address these problems may not be successful, resulting potentially in the theft, loss, destruction or corruption of information that KCS stores electronically, as well as unexpected interruptions, delays or cessation of service, any of which could cause harm to KCS’s business operations. Moreover, if a computer security

13

breach or cyber attack affects KCS’s systems or results in the unauthorized release of proprietary or personally identifiable information, the Company’s reputation could be materially damaged, customer confidence could be diminished, and KCS’s operations could be impaired.
A significant disruption, failure or unauthorized access of KCS’s information technology system could expose the Company to a risk of legal proceedings and potential liability and have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. Further, legislative or regulatory action in these areas is evolving, and KCS may be unable to adapt its IT systems or to manage the IT systems of third parties to accommodate these changes.
Severe weather or other natural disasters could result in significant business interruptions that impact KCS’s railroad operations and expenditures, and KCS’s insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover damages to KCS or all of KCS’s liabilities.
The Company’s railroad operations may be affected by severe weather or other natural disasters. The Company operates in and along the Gulf of Mexico, and its facilities, equipment, and railroad infrastructure may be materially adversely affectedby hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes and other extreme weather conditions in the regions where the Company operates, and this could also adversely affect the Company’s shipping, agricultural, chemical and other customers. Severe weather or other natural disasters could result in significant business interruption due to an increase in events such as train derailments or wash outs of track structure that could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. The Company's revenues can also be adversely affected by severe weather that causes damage and disruptions to the Company's customers. Insurance to protect against loss of business and other related consequences resulting from these natural occurrences is subject to coverage limitations and may not be sufficient to cover all of KCS’s damages or damages to others. This insurance may not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates. Even with insurance, if any natural occurrence leads to a catastrophic interruption of services, this could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s business may be adversely affected by changes in general economic or other market conditions.

KCS’s operations may be materially adversely affected by changes in the economic conditions of the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume the freight that KCS transports. The relative strength or weakness of the United States and Mexican economies affects the businesses served by KCS. Prolonged negative changes in domestic and global economic conditions, such as those caused by increasing inflation and inflationary factors, such as interest rates, supply chain constraints, consequences associated with COVID-19, the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia, and employee availability, may affect KCS, as well as the producers and consumers of the commodities that KCS transports and may have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The transportation industry is highly cyclical, generally tracking the cycles of the world economy. Although transportation markets are affected by general economic conditions, there are numerous specific factors within each particular market that may influence operating results. Some of KCS’s customers do business in industries that are highly cyclical, including the energy, automotive, housing and agriculture industries. Any downturn or change in government policy in these industries could have a material adverse effect on operating results. Also, some of the products transported have had a historical pattern of price cyclicality which has typically been influenced by the general economic environment and by industry capacity and demand. KCS cannot assure that prices and demand for these products will not decline in the future, adversely affecting those industries and, in turn, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS may be subject to various claims and litigation that could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company is exposed to the potential of various claims and litigation related to labor and employment, personal injury, environmental, climate change, commercial disputes, freight loss and other property damage, and other matters that arise in the normal course of business. The Company may experience material judgments or incur significant costs to defend existing and future lawsuits. Although the Company maintains insurance to cover some of these types of claims and establishes reserves when appropriate, final amounts determined to be due on any outstanding matters may exceed the Company’s insurance coverage or differ materially from the recorded reserves. Additionally, the Company could be impacted by adverse developments not currently reflected in the Company’s reserve estimates. The Company is also subject to job-related personal injury and occupational claims associated with the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (“FELA”), which is applicable only to railroads. FELA’s fault-based tort system produces results that are unpredictable and inconsistent as compared with a no-fault worker’s compensation system. The variability inherent in this system could result in actual costs being different from the

14

liability recorded. Any material changes to litigation trends or a catastrophic rail accident or series of accidents involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
A majority of KCS’s employees belong to labor unions. Strikes or work stoppages could adversely affect operations.
The Company is a party to collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions in the United States and Mexico. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 71% and 76% of KCSR and KCSM employees, respectively, were covered by labor contracts subject to collective bargaining. The Company may be subject to, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or work slowdowns as a result of disputes under these collective bargaining agreements and labor contracts or KCS’s potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions. In the United States, because such agreements are generally negotiated on an industry-wide basis, determination of the terms and conditions of labor agreements have been and could continue to be beyond KCS’s control. KCS is, therefore, subject to terms and conditions in industry-wide labor agreements that could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements. In the United States and Mexico, KCS is seeking to modernize its collective bargaining agreements and benefit from technological advancements in the industry. If the unionized workers in the United States or Mexico were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown; if other employees were to become unionized or if KCS and its unions were unable to agree on the terms and conditions in future labor agreements, KCS could experience a significant disruption of its operations and higher ongoing labor costs. Although the U.S. Railway Labor Act imposes restrictions on the right of United States railway workers to strike, there is no law in Mexico imposing similar restrictions on the right of railway workers in that country to strike. Additionally, labor law reform adopted by Mexico introduces uncertainty into the existing union structure in Mexico, which may affect the risk of disruption in KCSM’s operations.
KCS is dependent on certain key suppliers of core rail equipment.
KCS relies on a limited number of suppliers of core rail equipment (including locomotives, rolling stock equipment, rail and ties). The capital intensive nature and complexity of such equipment creates high barriers of entry for any potential new suppliers. If any of KCS’s suppliers discontinue production or experience capacity or supply shortages, this could result in increased costs or difficulty in obtaining rail equipment and materials, which could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s business is vulnerable to fluctuations in fuel costs and disruptions in fuel supplies.
KCS incurs substantial fuel costs in its railroad operations and these costs represent a significant portion of its transportation expenses. Significant price increases for fuel may have a material adverse effect on operating results. If KCS is unable to recapture its costs of fuel from its customers, operating results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, a severe disruption of fuel supplies resulting from supply shortages, political unrest, a disruption of oil imports, weather events, war, or otherwise, and the resulting impact on fuel prices could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s business may be affected by future acts of terrorism, war or other acts of violence or crime.
Terrorist attacks and any government response thereto, and war or risk of war could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. KCS is involved in the transport of hazardous materials, which could result in KCS’s rail lines, facilities, or equipment being direct targets or indirect casualties of acts of terror, which could cause significant business interruption and damage to KCS’s property. As a result, acts of terrorism or war or acts of crime or violence could result in increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues for KCS. In addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of the applicable coverage currently maintained by KCS could increase dramatically or certain coverage may not be adequate to cover losses or may not be available in the future.


15

Risks Related to Laws and Regulations
KCS U.S. and Mexico rail common carrier subsidiaries are required by United States and Mexican laws, respectively, to transport hazardous materials, which could expose KCS to significant costs and claims.
Under United States federal statutes and applicable Mexican laws, KCS’s common carrier responsibility requires it to transport hazardous materials. Any rail accident or other incident or accident on KCS’s network, facilities, or at the facilities of KCS’s customers involving the release of hazardous materials, including toxic inhalation hazard materials, could involve significant costs and claims for personal injury, property or natural resource damage, and environmental penalties and remediation in excess of the Company’s insurance coverage for these risks, which could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. KCS is also required to comply with rules and regulations regarding the handling of hazardous materials. Noncompliance with these rules and regulations could subject KCS to significant penalties or other costs and exposure to litigation. Changes to these rules and regulations could also increase operating costs and negatively impact KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s business is subject to regulation by federal, state and local legislatures and agencies that could impose significant costs on the Company’s business operations.
KCS rail subsidiaries are subject to legislation and regulation enacted by federal, state and local legislatures and agencies in the U.S. and Mexico with respect to commercial terms with its customers and railroad operations, including with respect to health, safety, labor, environmental and other areas. Government regulation of the railroad industry is a significant determinant of the competitiveness and profitability of railroads. Changes in legislation or regulation could have a negative impact on KCS’s ability to negotiate prices for rail services, could negatively affect competition among rail carriers, or could negatively impact operating practices, resulting in reduced efficiency, increased operating costs or increased capital investment, all of which could result in a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
New economic regulation in the U.S. or Mexico in current or future proceedings could change the regulatory framework within which the Company operates which could materially change the Company's business and have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. For example, in Mexico, the Company implemented changes to several processes and systems to ensure compliance with new regulations and enforcement of existing regulations, including labor reform, the hydrocarbons law, inspections related to imports and terminals, value-added tax law changes, and bill of lading requirements (referred to in Mexico as Carta Porte). Ensuring compliance with these requirements resulted in increased operating expense and reduced revenue. See Mexico Regulatory and Legal Updates in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
KCS’s failure or inability to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and operations, including fines, penalties, or limitations on operating activities until compliance with applicable requirements is achieved. Congress and government agencies may change the legislative or regulatory framework within which the Company operates without providing any recourse for any adverse effects on the Company’s business that occur as a result of such change. Additionally, some of the regulations require KCS to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits and other authorizations. Any failure to obtain or maintain these licenses, permits, and other authorizations could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s business operations.
KCS is subject to environmental regulations, which may impose significant costs on the Company’s business operations.
KCS subsidiaries’ operations are subject to environmental regulation enacted by federal, state and local legislatures in the U.S. and Mexico. Environmental liability under federal and state law in the United States can also extend to previously owned or operated properties, leased properties and properties owned by third parties, as well as to properties currently owned and used by the Company. Environmental liabilities may also arise from claims asserted by adjacent landowners or other third parties. Given the nature of its business, the Company incurs, and expects to continue to incur, environmental compliance costs, including, in particular, costs necessary to maintain compliance with requirements governing chemical and hazardous material shipping operations, refueling operations and repair facilities. KCS presently has environmental investigation and remediation obligations at certain sites, and will likely incur such obligations at additional sites in the future.
The Company’s Mexican subsidiaries’ operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including standards for, among other things, water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. Under applicable Mexican law

16

and regulations, administrative and criminal proceedings may be brought and economic sanctions imposed against companies that violate environmental laws, and non-complying facilities may be temporarily or permanently closed. KCSM is also subject to the laws of various jurisdictions with respect to the discharge of materials into the environment and to environmental laws and regulations issued by the governments of each of the Mexican states in which KCSM’s facilities are located. The terms of KCSM’s Concession from the Mexican government also impose environmental compliance obligations on KCSM. Failure to comply with any environmental laws or regulations may result in the termination of KCSM’s Concession or in fines or penalties that may affect profitability.
Liabilities accrued for environmental costs represent the Company’s best estimate of the probable future obligation for the remediation and settlement of matters related to these sites. However, remediation costs may exceed such estimates, due to various factors such as evolving environmental laws and regulations, changes in technology, the extent of other parties’ participation, discovery of unidentified environmental conditions and matters, developments in environmental surveys and studies, and the extent of corrective action that may ultimately be required. The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that unidentified environmental matters or the adoption of unknown additional or more stringent environmental laws and regulations would have on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s failure or inability to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and operations, including fines, penalties, or limitations on operating activities until compliance with applicable requirements is achieved. Government entities may change the legislative or regulatory framework within which the Company operates that could result in adverse effects on the Company’s business that occur as a result of such change. Additionally, some of the regulations require KCS to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits and other authorizations. Any failure to obtain or maintain these licenses, permits, and other authorizations could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s business operations.
KCS’s business may be affected by climate change and the market and regulatory responses to climate change.
Climate change could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s operations and KCS’s consolidated financial statements. Restrictions, caps, taxes, or other controls on emissions of greenhouse gases, including diesel exhaust, could significantly impact operations and increase operating costs. Restrictions on emissions could also affect KCS’s customers that use commodities that KCS transports to produce energy, use significant amounts of energy in producing or delivering the commodities KCS transports, or manufacture or produce goods that consume significant amounts of energy or burn fossil fuels, including coal-fired power plants, chemical producers, farmers and food producers, and automakers and other manufacturers. Significant cost increases, government regulation, or changes of consumer preferences for goods or services relating to alternative sources of energy or emissions reductions could materially affect the markets for the commodities KCS transports, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. Government incentives encouraging the use of alternative sources of energy could also affect certain customers and their respective markets for certain commodities KCS transports in an unpredictable manner that could alter traffic patterns, including, for example, the impacts of ethanol incentives on farming and ethanol producers. Moreover, increasing frequency, intensity and duration of extreme weather events such as flooding, storms and fires may result in substantial costs, including costs associated with KCS’s response during the event, KCS’s recovery from the event and preventive measures. Any of these factors, individually or in conjunction with one or more of the other aforementioned factors, or other unforeseen impacts of climate change could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company has established greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets. KCS's inability to achieve GHG emissions reduction targets could negatively impact both the Company’s reputation and financial results. KCS has established science-based GHG emissions reduction targets to address a substantial portion of the Company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2034. The primary risks associated with achieving these commitments include, but are not limited to, not achieving targets set for fuel efficiency improvements, future investments in and the availability of GHG emissions-reduction tools and technologies, KCS's ability to work with governments and third parties to mitigate the impacts of climate change, domestic and international economic conditions, the effects of competition and regulation, capital spending, the willingness of customers to acquire the Company’s services, cost of network expansion, maintenance and retrofits. The Company’s targets are subject to the accuracy of the assumptions in the science-based methodology used to calculate these targets. The Company cannot assure that KCS's plans to reduce GHG emissions will be viable or successful. Inability to meet GHG emissions reduction targets could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s results of operations or financial position.


17

Risks Related to the Company’s Merger with CP

During the pendency of the Voting Trust, KCS is subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions that could materially adversely affect KCS’s operating results, financial position and/or cash flows or result in a loss of employees, suppliers, vendors or customers.

The Merger Agreement generally requires KCS to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course prior to the date CP is permitted to assume control over KCS’s railroad operations following receipt of STB Final Approval and exit from the Voting Trust. In addition, the Merger Agreement includes a variety of specified restrictions on the conduct of KCS’s business during the pendency of the Voting Trust. These contractual restrictions in the Merger Agreement may delay or prevent KCS from making certain changes, or limit its ability to make certain changes during such period, even if KCS’s management believes that making certain changes may be advisable. The pendency of the Voting Trust may also divert management’s attention and KCS’s resources from ongoing business operations.

KCS’s employees, suppliers, vendors or customers may experience uncertainties about the effects of the transaction. It is possible that some employees, suppliers, vendors, or customers and other parties with whom KCS has a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationship with KCS as a result of the proposed acquisition. Similarly, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with KCS following completion of the transaction, which may materially and adversely affect KCS’s ability to attract and retain key employees. If any of these effects were to occur, it could materially and adversely impact KCS’s operating results, financial position, and cash flows.

The Company can provide no assurance of the timing of STB Final Approval or whether STB Final Approval will be obtained at all. Any delay in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, STB Final Approval could divert management’s attention and KCS’s resources from ongoing business operations and materially and adversely impact KCS’s operating results, financial position, and cash flows.

KCS may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other key employees in light of the combination of CP and KCS.
Uncertainty about the effect of the transaction on KCS and CP employees may have an adverse effect on KCS and consequently the combined company. This uncertainty may impair KCS’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel. Employee retention may be particularly challenging during the pendency of the Voting Trust, as employees of KCS may experience uncertainty about their future roles in the combined company. No assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to attract or retain key employees to the same extent that KCS has been able to attract or retain employees in the past.

Significant demands will be placed on KCS as a result of the combination of the two companies.
As a result of the combination of KCS and CP following receipt of STB Final Approval, significant demands will be placed on the managerial, operational and financial personnel and systems of KCS. KCS cannot provide assurance that its systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support the expansion of operations following and resulting from the combination of the two companies. The future operating results of the combined company will be affected by the ability of its officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and to implement and expand the Company’s operational and financial controls and reporting systems in response to the transaction.


18

Risks Related to KCS’s Foreign Operations
KCSM’s Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in certain circumstances, which would prevent KCSM from conducting rail operations under the Concession and would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
KCSM operates under the Concession granted by the Mexican government until June 2047, which is renewable for an additional period of up to 50 years, subject to certain conditions. The Concession gives KCSM exclusive rights to provide freight transportation services over its rail lines through 2037 (the first 40 years of the 50-year Concession), subject to certain trackage and haulage rights granted to other concessionaires. The SICT and ARTF, which are principally responsible for regulating railroad services in Mexico, have broad powers to monitor KCSM’s compliance with the Concession, and they can require KCSM to supply them with any technical, administrative, operative, and financial information they request. Among other obligations, KCSM must comply with the investment commitments established in its business plan, which forms an integral part of the Concession, and must update the plan every three years. The SICT treats KCSM’s business plans confidentially. The SICT and ARTF also monitor KCSM’s compliance with efficiency and safety standards established in the Concession. The SICT and ARTF review, and may amend, these standards from time to time.
Under the Concession, KCSM has the right to operate its rail lines, but it does not own the land, roadway, or associated structures. If the Mexican government legally terminates the Concession, it would own, control, and manage such public domain assets used in the operation of KCSM’s rail lines. All other property not covered by the Concession, including all locomotives and railcars, otherwise acquired, would remain KCSM’s property. In the event of early termination, or total or partial revocation of the Concession, the Mexican government would have the right to cause the Company to lease all service-related assets to it for a term of at least one year, automatically renewable for additional one-year terms for up to five years. The amount of rent would be determined by experts appointed by KCSM and the Mexican government. The Mexican government must exercise this right within four months after early termination or revocation of the Concession. In addition, the Mexican government would also have a right of first refusal with respect to certain transfers by KCSM of railroad equipment within 90 days after revocation of the Concession.
The Mexican government may also temporarily seize control of KCSM’s rail lines and its assets in the event of a natural disaster, war, significant public disturbance, or imminent danger to the domestic peace or economy. In such a case, the SICT may restrict KCSM’s ability to operate under the Concession in such manner as the SICT deems necessary under the circumstances, but only for the duration of any of the foregoing events. Mexican law requires that the Mexican government pay compensation if it effects a statutory appropriation for reasons of the public interest. With respect to a temporary seizure due to any cause other than international war, the Mexican Regulatory Railroad Service Law and regulations provide that the Mexican government will indemnify an affected concessionaire for an amount equal to damages caused and losses suffered. However, these payments may not be sufficient to compensate KCSM for its losses and may not be made timely.
The SICT may revoke the Concession if KCSM is sanctioned for the same cause at least three times within a period of five years for any of the following: unjustly interrupting the operation of its rail lines or for charging rates higher than those it has registered with the ARTF; unlawfully restricting the ability of other Mexican rail operators to use its rail lines; failing to make payments for damages caused during the performance of services; failing to comply with any term or condition of the Mexican Regulatory Railroad Service Law and regulations or the Concession; failing to make the capital investments required under its three-year business plan filed with the SICT; or failing to maintain an obligations compliance bond and insurance coverage as specified in the Mexican Regulatory Railroad Service Law and regulations. In addition, the Concession would terminate automatically if KCSM changes its nationality or assigns or creates any lien on the Concession, or if there is a change in control of KCSM without the SICT’s approval. The SICT may also terminate the Concession as a result of KCSM’s surrender of its rights under the Concession, for reasons of public interest, or upon KCSM’s liquidation or bankruptcy. If the Concession is terminated or revoked by the SICT for any reason, KCSM would receive no compensation and its interest in its rail lines, and all other fixtures covered by the Concession, as well as all improvements made by it, would revert to the Mexican government. Revocation or termination of the Concession could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
KCS’s ownership of KCSM and operations in Mexico subject it to Mexican economic and political risks.
The Mexican government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Accordingly, Mexican governmental actions concerning the economy and state-owned enterprises could have a significant impact on Mexican private sector entities in general and on KCSM’s operations in particular. For example, KCSM operations

19

could be impacted by the introduction of new legislation or policies to regulate the railway industry, the energy market, or labor and tax conditions. KCS cannot predict the impact that the political landscape, including multiparty rule, social unrest and civil disobedience, will have on the Mexican economy or KCSM’s operations. For example, from time to time, social unrest in Mexico has resulted in service interruptions on KCSM’s right of ways due to blockages from teachers’ protests. KCS’s consolidated financial statements and prospects may be adversely affected by currency fluctuations, inflation, interest rates, regulation, taxation and other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Mexico. For example, the Company has several tax contingencies including, multiple tax periods subject to current examination, audit assessments for the KCSM 2009, 2010, 2013, and 2014 Mexico tax returns, and a receivable for refundable value added tax (“VAT”). Tax contingencies are further discussed with Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplemental Data.
The social and political situation in Mexico could adversely affect the Mexican economy and KCSM’s operations, and changes in laws, public policies and government programs could be enacted, each of which could also have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The Mexican economy in the past has suffered a balance of payment deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves. Although Mexico has imposed foreign exchange controls in the past, there are currently no exchange controls in Mexico. Any restrictive exchange control policy could adversely affect KCS’s ability to obtain U.S. dollars or convert Mexican pesos into dollars for purposes of making payments. This could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
Downturns in the United States economy or in trade between the United States and Asia or Mexico and fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rates could have material adverse effects on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
The level and timing of KCS’s Mexican business activity are heavily dependent upon the level of United States-Mexican trade and the effects of current or future multinational trade agreements on such trade. The Mexican operations depend on the United States and Mexican markets for the products KCSM transports, the relative position of Mexico and the United States in these markets at any given time, and tariffs or other barriers to trade. Failure to preserve trade provisions conducive to trade, or any other action imposing import duties or border taxes, could negatively impact KCS customers and the volume of rail shipments, and could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
Downturns in the United States or Mexican economies or in trade between the United States and Mexico could have material adverse effects on KCS’s consolidated financial statements and the Company’s ability to meet debt service obligations. In addition, KCS has invested significant amounts in developing its intermodal operations, including the Port of Lazaro Cardenas, in part to provide Asian importers with an alternative to the west coast ports of the United States, and the level of intermodal traffic depends, to an extent, on the volume of Asian shipments routed through Lazaro Cardenas. Reductions in trading volumes, which may be caused by factors beyond KCS’s control, including increased government regulations regarding the safety and quality of Asian-manufactured products, could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rates could lead to shifts in the types and volumes of Mexican imports and exports. Although a decrease in the level of exports of some of the commodities that KCSM transports to the United States may be offset by a subsequent increase in imports of other commodities KCSM hauls into Mexico and vice versa, any offsetting increase might not occur on a timely basis, if at all. Future developments in United States-Mexican trade beyond the Company’s control may result in a reduction of freight volumes or in an unfavorable shift in the mix of products and commodities KCSM carries.
Extreme volatility in the peso-dollar exchange rate may result in disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may limit the ability to transfer or convert Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars. Although the Mexican government currently does not restrict, and for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer foreign currencies out of Mexico, the Mexican government could, as in the past, institute restrictive exchange rate policies that could limit the ability to transfer or convert pesos into U.S. dollars or other currencies for the purpose of making timely payments and meeting contractual commitments.
Fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rates also have an effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements. A weakening of the peso against the U.S. dollar would cause reported peso-denominated revenues and expenses to decrease, and could increase reported foreign exchange loss due to the Company’s net monetary assets that are peso-denominated. Exchange

20

rate variations also affect the calculation of taxes under Mexican income tax law, and a strengthening of the peso against the U.S. dollar could cause an increase in the Company’s cash tax obligation and effective income tax rate.

General Risk Factors
The unavailability of qualified personnel could adversely affect KCS’s operations.
Changes in demographics, training requirements and the unavailability of qualified personnel could negatively affect KCS’s ability to meet demand for rail service. Unforeseen increases in demand for rail services may exacerbate such risks, which could have a negative impact on KCS’s operational efficiency and otherwise have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.
Weaknesses in the short and long-term debt markets could negatively impact the Company’s access to capital.
Due to the significant capital expenditures required to operate and maintain a safe and efficient railroad, the Company regularly obtains financing through the issuance of long-term debt instruments and commercial paper from time-to-time, as well as credit facilities provided by financial institutions. Significant, sustained instability or disruptions of the capital markets, including credit markets, or the deterioration of the Company’s financial condition due to internal or external factors, could restrict or prohibit access and could increase the cost of financing sources. A significant deterioration of the Company’s financial condition could also reduce credit ratings to below investment grade, limiting its access to external sources of capital, and increasing the costs of short and long-term debt financing, and could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.Properties
Track Configuration
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”) operates over a railroad system consisting of approximately 3,300 route miles in ten states from the midwest and southeast portions of the United States south to the Mexican border, which includes approximately 640 miles of trackage rights that permit KCSR to operate its trains with its crews over other railroads’ tracks.
Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (“KCSM”) operates over a railroad system consisting of approximately 3,800 route miles. This includes approximately 3,300 route miles operated under its concession from the Mexican government (the “Concession”), and approximately 550 miles of trackage rights. Under the Concession, KCSM does not own the land, roadway, or associated structures, but is provided the exclusive right to operate across these routes, while also requiring KCSM to make investments as described in a business plan filed every three years with the Mexican government. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — “KCSM’s Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in certain circumstances, which would prevent KCSM from conducting rail operations under the Concession and would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.”



21

Kansas City Southern Rail Network
ksu-20221231_g5.jpg

22

Equipment Configuration
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, KCS owned and leased the following units of equipment:
20222021
OwnedLeasedTotal
Avg Age
(in Years)
OwnedLeasedTotal
Avg Age
(in Years)
Freight Cars:
Box cars2,044 755 2,799 28.0 2,072 691 2,763 27.3 
Hoppers (covered and open top)4,785 1,161 5,946 16.9 4,809 1,164 5,973 15.9 
Gondolas2,409 1,331 3,740 24.4 2,418 1,180 3,598 24.9 
Automotive3,281 321 3,602 9.2 3,304 323 3,627 8.2 
Flat cars (intermodal and other)852 53 905 29.4 793 53 846 27.5 
Tank cars— 347 347 28.0 — 332 332 27.1 
Total13,371 3,968 17,339 19.6 13,396 3,743 17,139 18.8 
Locomotives:
Freight816 — 816 19.3 815 — 815 17.9 
Switching190 — 190 49.4 192 — 192 46.7 
Total1,006 — 1,006 25 1,007 — 1,007 23.4 
Property and Facilities
KCS operates numerous facilities, including terminals for intermodal and other freight, rail yards for train-building, switching, storage-in-transit (the temporary storage of customer goods in rail cars prior to shipment) and other activities; offices to administer and manage operations; dispatch centers to direct traffic on the rail network; crew quarters to house train crews along the rail line; and shops and other facilities for fueling and maintenance and repair of locomotives, freight cars and other equipment.
Capital Expenditures
The Company’s cash capital expenditures for the two years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, are included in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Capital Expenditures. See also Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Capitalization, Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment (including Concession Assets) regarding the Company’s policies and guidelines related to capital expenditures.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. For more information on legal proceedings, see Item 1A, Risk Factors — “KCS may be subject to various claims and litigation that could have a material adverse effect on KCS’s consolidated financial statements,” Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  — Other Matters — Litigation, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


23

Part II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information
At December 31, 2022, all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock are held in the Voting Trust. Prior to the closing of the acquisition, the Company’s common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “KSU”. The merger is further discussed within Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of Operations — Merger Agreement.

Item 6.[Reserved]

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of Kansas City Southern’s results of operations, certain changes in its financial position, liquidity, capital structure and business developments for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the included consolidated financial statements, the related notes, and other information included in this report.
CAUTIONARY INFORMATION
The discussions set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. In addition, management may make forward-looking statements orally or in other writings, including, but not limited to, in press releases, executive presentations, in annual reports, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers can usually identify these forward-looking statements by the use of such verbs as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “plans,” “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes” or similar verbs or conjugations of such verbs. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates, beliefs, and projections. While the Company believes these expectations, assumptions, estimates, and projections are reasonable, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors or circumstances that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to, the factors identified below and those discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K. Readers are strongly encouraged to consider these factors and the following factors when evaluating any forward-looking statements concerning the Company:
public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases;
transportation of hazardous materials;
United States, Mexican and global economic, political and social conditions (including inflation);
the adverse impact of any termination or revocation by the Mexican government of Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V.’s (“KCSM”) Concession;
changes in legislation and regulations or revisions of controlling authority;
the effects of adverse general economic conditions affecting customer demand and the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume the commodities KCS carries;
the effect of demand for KCS’s services exceeding network capacity or traffic congestion on operating efficiencies and service reliability;
KCS’s reliance on agreements with other railroads and third parties to successfully implement its business strategy, operations and growth and expansion plans, including the strategy to convert customers from using trucking services to rail transportation services;
the dependence on the stability, availability and security of the information technology systems to operate its business;
acts of terrorism, war or other acts of violence or crime or risk of such activities;

24

uncertainties regarding the litigation KCS faces and any future claims and litigation;
the outcome of claims and litigation, including those related to environmental contamination, personal injuries and property damage;
compliance with environmental regulations;
natural events such as severe weather, fire, floods, hurricanes, earthquakes or other disruptions to the Company’s operating systems, structures and equipment or the ability of customers to produce or deliver their products;
insurance coverage limitations;
climate change and the market and regulatory responses to climate change;
the impact of competition, including competition from other rail carriers, trucking companies and maritime shippers in the United States and Mexico;
the effects of fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rate;
changes in labor costs and labor difficulties, including strikes and work stoppages affecting either operations or customers’ abilities to deliver goods for shipment;
the effects of current and future multinational trade agreements on the level of trade among the United States, Mexico and Canada;
the level of trade between the United States and Asia or Mexico;
unavailability of qualified personnel;
disruption in fuel supplies, changes in fuel prices and the Company’s ability to recapture its costs of fuel from customers;
business uncertainties and contractual restrictions that could arise during the pendency of the Voting Trust
difficulty attracting, motivating, and retaining executives and other key employees;
significant demands placed on KCS as a result of the merger of the two companies;
KCS’s reliance on certain key suppliers of core rail equipment; and
material adverse changes in economic and industry conditions, including the availability of short and long-term financing, both within the United States and Mexico and globally.
Forward-looking statements reflect the information only as of the date on which they are made. Forward-looking statements are not, and should not be relied upon as, a guarantee of future events or performance, nor will they necessarily prove to be accurate indications of the times at or by which any such events or performance will be achieved. As a result, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of certain events or otherwise, unless required by law.
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
Kansas City Southern, a Delaware corporation, is a transportation holding company that has railroad investments in the U.S., Mexico and Panama. In the U.S., the Company serves the midwest and southeast regions of the U.S. Its international holdings serve northeastern and central Mexico and the port cities of Lazaro Cardenas, Tampico and Veracruz, and a fifty percent interest in Panama Canal Railway Company provides ocean-to-ocean freight and passenger service along the Panama Canal. KCS’s North American rail holdings and strategic alliances are primary components of a railway system, linking the commercial and industrial centers of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. KCS’s principal subsidiaries and affiliates include the following:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary;
KCSM, a wholly-owned subsidiary;
Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);
Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a seventy percent-owned consolidated affiliate;

25

Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), a fifty percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate;
TFCM, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“TCM”), a forty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate;
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate; and
PTC-220, LLC (“PTC-220”), a thirteen percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Merger Agreement
On September 15, 2021, KCS and CP entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) and on December 14, 2021, CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS. Each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of KCS that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive (1) 2.884 common shares of CP and (2) $90 in cash (together, the “Merger Consideration”), and each share of preferred stock, par value $25 per share, that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive $37.50 in cash. The Merger Consideration value received by KCS stockholders was $301.20 per KCS common share.
The merger transaction was completed through a series of mergers as outlined in the Merger Agreement. These mergers ultimately resulted in KCS being merged with and into Cygnus Merger Sub 1 Corporation (“Surviving Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CP, with Surviving Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Surviving Merger Sub was renamed “Kansas City Southern” and as successor company of KCS, continued to own the assets of KCS. Immediately following the consummation of the mergers, CP caused the contribution, directly and indirectly, of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Surviving Merger Sub, as successor to KCS, to be deposited into an independent, irrevocable voting trust (the “Voting Trust”) under a voting trust agreement (the “Voting Trust Agreement”) approved by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), pending receipt of the final and non-appealable approval or exemption by the STB pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11323 et seq., of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (“STB Final Approval”). The Voting Trust prevents CP, or any affiliate of CP, from controlling or having the power to control KCS prior to STB Final Approval. Following receipt of STB Final Approval, the Voting Trust will be terminated and CP will acquire control over KCS’s railroad operations. STB Final Approval is expected to be granted in the first quarter of 2023, subject to the regulatory review process.
On December 14, 2021, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (the “NYSE”merger of KCS and Surviving Merger Sub was accounted for as a recapitalization of KCS’s equity. Upon STB Final Approval, the transaction will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. See more details regarding the recapitalization in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 14, Stockholder(s)’ Equity.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, periodic cash distributions may be made to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP based upon cash generated, the timing of capital expenditures and working capital needs of the Company. During 2022, KCS paid cash dividends of $880.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, KCS reported $46.6 million of merger-related costs. These merger costs primarily related to incentive compensation costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, KCS reported $264.0 million of merger-related costs. These merger costs primarily related to bankers’ fees, compensation and benefits costs, and legal fees. These costs were recognized in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income.
Ukraine Crisis
The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 has led to disruption, instability, and volatility in global markets and industries. The U.S. government and other foreign governments have imposed severe economic sanctions and export controls against Russia, certain regions of Ukraine and particular entities and individuals, removed Russia from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (“SWIFT”) filed Form 25ssystem, and may impose additional sanctions and controls. The full impact of these sanctions and controls, as well as responses to them by Russia has and could in the future result in, among other things, severe or complete restrictions on exports to and other commerce and business dealings involving Russia, certain regions of Ukraine, and/or particular entities and individuals. In addition, this ongoing invasion has caused energy prices to rise, leading to increased inflationary impacts. To date, the Company has not experienced a material impact to operations or the consolidated financial statements as a result of the invasion of Ukraine; however, KCS will continue to monitor for events that could materially impact the Company.

26

Inflation
Consumer price annual inflation rates as of December 31, 2022 were 6.5% and 7.8% in the U.S. and Mexico, respectively. KCS continues to closely monitor the impact of rapidly increasing inflation on the Company’s financial results and procurement supply chain. As of December 31, 2022, higher inflation has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial results. Additionally, supply chain disruptions have not materially impacted the Company’s ability to procure essential materials and services on a timely basis.

Inflation is expected to remain elevated for the near future. Inflationary factors, such as increases in interest rates, overhead costs and transportation costs may adversely affect the Company’s financial results. Although the Company does not believe that inflation has had a material impact on KCS’s financial results to date, the Company may experience some effect in the near future due to supply chain constraints, consequences associated with the Securitiesnovel coronavirus and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”its variants (“COVID-19”), the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia, employee availability, and wage increases.
2022 Financial Overview
Revenues increased 14% for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 2021, due to a 9% increase in revenue per carload/unit and a 5% increase in carload/unit volumes. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, and longer average length of haul, partially offset by mix. Carload/unit volumes increased due to strong demand, new business, a partial recovery of the global microchip shortage, service interruptions at Lazaro Cardenas port in Mexico in 2021, and improved cycle times. These increases were partially offset by decreased volumes in chemicals and petroleum refined fuel products due to regulatory impacts.
Operating expenses increased 4% for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 2021, primarily due to increased diesel fuel prices, wage and benefit inflation, depreciation expense, personal injury expense, headcount and hours worked, and fuel consumption, partially offset by a decrease in merger costs. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues (“operating ratio”) decreased to delist63.6% in 2022 from 70.0% in 2021.



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2022, compared with the registrant’s common stockYear Ended December 31, 2021
The following summarizes KCS’s consolidated income statement components (in millions):
20222021Change
Revenues$3,370.4 $2,947.3 $423.1 
Operating expenses2,143.3 2,063.5 79.8 
Operating income1,227.1 883.8 343.3 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates8.7 16.7 (8.0)
Interest expense(156.6)(156.0)(0.6)
Foreign exchange loss(33.2)(9.0)(24.2)
Gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements259.3 — 259.3 
Other income, net4.4 2.6 1.8 
Income before income taxes1,309.7 738.1 571.6 
Income tax expense325.9 211.1 114.8 
Net income983.8 527.0 456.8 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest1.6 1.8 (0.2)
Net income attributable to Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries$982.2 $525.2 $457.0 


27

Operating Metrics
The Company has established the following key metrics and preferred stockgoals to measure precision scheduled railroading (“PSR”) progress and performance:
Years endedImprovement/ (Deterioration)
December 31,
20222021
Gross velocity (mph) (i)14.114.01%
Terminal dwell (hours) (ii)22.223.56%
Train length (feet) (iii)6,4796,635(2)%
Fuel efficiency (gallons per 1,000 GTM's) (iv)1.261.23(2)%
(i) Gross velocity is the average train speed between origin and destination in miles per hour calculated as the sum of the miles traveled divided by the sum of total transit hours. Transit hours are measured as the difference between a train’s origin departure and destination arrival date and times broken down by segment across the train route (includes all time spent including crew changes, terminal dwell, delays, and incidents).
(ii) Terminal dwell is the average amount of time in hours between car arrival to and departure from the yard (excludes cars that move through a terminal on a run-through train, stored, bad ordered, and maintenance-of-way cars). Calculated by dividing the total number of hours cars spent in terminals by the total count of car dwell events.
(iii) Train length is the average length of a train across its reporting stations, including the origin and intermediate stations. Length of a train is the sum of car and locomotive lengths measured in feet.
(iv) Fuel efficiency is calculated by taking locomotive fuel consumed in gallons divided by thousand gross ton miles (“GTM’s”) net of detours with no associated fuel gallons. GTM’s are the movement of one ton of train weight over one mile calculated by multiplying total train weight by distance the train moved. GTM’s exclude locomotive gross ton miles.
For the full year ended December 31, 2022, the improvement in dwell and velocity, as compared to the same period in 2021, was due to improved network fluidity during the first half of the year. The reduction in train length and deteriorated fuel efficiency were due to congestion and resource pressure in northern Mexico, particularly during the second half of the year.

Revenues
The following summarizes revenues (in millions), carload/unit statistics (in thousands) and revenue per carload/unit:
RevenuesCarloads and UnitsRevenue per Carload/Unit
20222021% Change20222021% Change20222021% Change
Chemical and petroleum$783.5 $851.8 (8 %)323.3 371.5 (13 %)$2,423 $2,293 %
Industrial and consumer products710.6 589.6 21 %335.0 304.3 10 %2,121 1,938 %
Agriculture and minerals682.0 571.7 19 %288.5 269.9 %2,364 2,118 12 %
Energy305.2 254.8 20 %271.1 263.1 %1,126 968 16 %
Intermodal449.7 346.3 30 %1,034.1 952.8 %435 363 20 %
Automotive258.4 183.2 41 %130.6 104.6 25 %1,979 1,751 13 %
Carload revenues, carloads and units3,189.4 2,797.4 14 %2,382.6 2,266.2 %$1,339 $1,234 %
Other revenue181.0 149.9 21 %
Total revenues (i)$3,370.4 $2,947.3 14 %
(i) Included in revenues:
Fuel surcharge$501.6 $274.5 

28

Revenues include revenue for transportation services and fuel surcharges. For the year ended December 31, 2022, revenues increased 14% due to an increase in revenue per carload/unit of 9% and an increase in carloads/unit volumes of 5%, respectively, compared to 2021.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, revenue per carload/unit increased by 9%, compared to the prior year, due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, and longer average length of haul, partially offset by mix. The average exchange rate of Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar was Ps.20.1 for 2022, compared to Ps.20.3 for 2021, which resulted in an increase to revenues of approximately $5.5 million.
Carload/unit volumes increased due to strong demand, new business, a partial recovery of the global microchip shortage, service interruptions at the Port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico in 2021, and improved cycle times. These increases were partially offset by decreased volumes in chemicals and petroleum refined fuel products due to regulatory impacts.
KCS’s fuel surcharges are a mechanism to adjust revenue based upon changes in fuel prices above fuel price thresholds set in KCS’s tariffs or contracts. Fuel surcharge revenue is calculated using a fuel price from a prior time period that can be up to 60 days earlier. In a period of volatile fuel prices or changing customer business mix, changes in fuel expense and fuel surcharge revenue may differ.
Fuel surcharge revenue increased $227.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher fuel prices.
The following discussion provides an analysis of revenues by commodity group:
Revenues by commodity
group for 2022


Chemical and petroleum. Revenues decreased $68.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a 13% decrease in carload/unit volumes, partially offset by a 6% increase in revenue per carload/unit. Volumes decreased due to refined fuel product shipments into Mexico being negatively impacted by supply chain disruptions as a result of increased regulation. Refer to Mexico Regulatory and Legal Updates for further discussion. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge and positive pricing impacts, partially offset by mix and shorter average length of haul.
ksu-20221231_g6.jpg
Industrial and consumer products. Revenues increased $121.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a 10% increase in carload/unit volumes and 9% increase in revenue per carload/unit. Metal volumes increased due to new steel plants that opened on the KCSM network in 2021 and higher demand. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, and longer average length of haul, partially offset by mix.
ksu-20221231_g7.jpg

29

Revenues by commodity
group for 2022
Agriculture and minerals. Revenues increased $110.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to 12% increase in revenue per carload/unit and a 7% increase in carload/unit volumes. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, and longer average length of haul, partially offset by mix. Volumes increased due to higher demand for cross-border grain and improved cycle times.
ksu-20221231_g8.jpg
Energy. Revenues increased $50.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a 16% increase in revenue per carload/unit and a 3% increase in carload/unit volumes. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, and longer average length of haul, partially offset by mix. Volumes increased due to new crude oil business, partially offset by a decline in utility coal as a result of deteriorated interchange cycle times and utility plant maintenance outages.
ksu-20221231_g9.jpg

Intermodal. Revenues increased $103.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a 20% increase in revenue per carload/unit and a 9% increase in carload/unit volumes. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, mix, and positive pricing impacts. Volumes increased due to service interruptions at the Port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico in 2021, stronger demand, new business, and a partial recovery of the global microchip shortage affecting auto parts shipments.
Automotive. Revenues increased $75.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a 25% increase in carload/unit volumes and a 13% increase in revenue per carload/unit. Volumes increased due to partial recovery of the global microchip shortage. Revenue per carload/unit increased due to higher fuel surcharge, positive pricing impacts, mix, the strengthening of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, and longer average length of haul.

30


Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, as shown below (in millions), increased $79.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, primarily due to increased diesel fuel prices, wage and benefit inflation, depreciation expense, personal injury expense, headcount and hours worked, and fuel consumption, partially offset by a decrease in merger costs.
The strengthening of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar resulted in increased expense of approximately $5.0 million for expense transactions denominated in Mexican pesos. The average exchange rate of Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar was Ps.20.1 for 2022 compared to Ps.20.3 for 2021.

Change
20222021DollarsPercent
Compensation and benefits$567.0 $522.0 $45.0 %
Purchased services225.9 211.8 14.1 %
Fuel461.7 313.6 148.1 47 %
Equipment costs91.4 82.2 9.2 11 %
Depreciation and amortization390.9 365.8 25.1 %
Materials and other359.8 304.1 55.7 18 %
Merger costs, net46.6 264.0 (217.4)(82 %)
Total operating expenses$2,143.3 $2,063.5 $79.8 %
Compensation and benefits. Compensation and benefits increased $45.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to wage and benefit inflation of approximately $31.0 million, increase in headcount and hours worked of approximately $15.0 million primarily due to operational inefficiencies, and incremental retroactive wage and bonus expense resulting from agreements with U.S. unions of approximately $5.0 million, partially offset by decreased incentive compensation of approximately $14.0 million.
The Company expects U.S union compensation will increase in 2023, as compared to 2022, by approximately $10.0 million as a result of the agreements on the 2020 collective bargaining round. The round of national bargaining between the nation’s freight railroads and all twelve rail unions was fully resolved December 2, 2022.
Purchased services. Purchased services expense increased $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to an increase in repairs and maintenance expense of approximately $12.0 million, increased software and programming expense of approximately $8.0 million, an increase in intermodal lift services of approximately $4.0 million, increases in security costs of approximately $3.0 million and increases in corporate services of approximately $2.0 million, partially offset by cost reductions of approximately $19.0 million as a result of Mexico outsourcing reform, which prohibited the subcontracting and outsourcing of personnel.
Fuel. Fuel expense increased $148.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to higher diesel fuel prices in the U.S. and Mexico of approximately $93.0 million and $34.0 million, respectively, increased consumption of approximately $13.0 million, decreased efficiency of approximately $7.0 million and the strengthening of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar of approximately $1.0 million. The average price per gallon was $3.48 in 2022, compared to $2.50 in 2021.
Equipment costs. Equipment costs increased $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to increased car hire expense of approximately $8.0 million due to increased volumes and cycle times.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to a larger asset base and an increase in depreciation rates on equipment as a result of an updated depreciation study.
Materials and other. Materials and other expense increased $55.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, due to increased materials expense of approximately $25.0 million, including approximately $13.0 million

31

of material purchases resulting from Mexico outsourcing reform, an increase in personal injury expense of approximately $15.0 million, increased expense of approximately $14.0 million related to the non-creditable VAT due to VAT law changes in Mexico, and higher employee expenses of approximately $12.0 million. These increases were partially offset by a one-time contract dispute of approximately $10.0 million recognized in 2021.
Merger costs, net. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized merger costs, net, of $46.6 million and $264.0 million, respectively. Merger costs in 2022 primarily related to incentive compensation. Merger costs in 2021 primarily related to bankers’ fees, compensation and benefits costs, and legal fees. Refer to Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 3, Merger Agreement for more information.

Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Equity in net earnings of affiliates. Equity in net earnings of affiliates decreased $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, primarily due to a decrease in net earnings from the NYSEoperations of TFCM, S. de R.L de C.V. (“TCM”) due to higher interest and tax expense, a decrease in net earnings from the operations of Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”) resulting from a gain on insurance recoveries recognized in 2021, and decreased net earnings from unrealized depreciation of investments held in a fifteen percent-owned equity investment.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to deregister2021, due to higher average debt balances. For the common stockyear ended December 31, 2022, the average debt balance (including commercial paper) was $3,811.8 million, compared to $3,809.4 million in 2021. The average interest rate for the years ended December 31, 2022 and preferred stock under Section 12(b)2021 was 4.1% for both periods.
Foreign exchange loss. For the year ended December 31, 2022, foreign exchange loss was $33.2 million, compared to $9.0 million in 2021. Foreign exchange gain (loss) includes the re-measurement and settlement of net monetary assets denominated in Mexican pesos and the gain (loss) on foreign currency derivative contracts.
For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the re-measurement and settlement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican pesos resulted in a foreign exchange gain of $11.1 million and a loss of $5.3 million, respectively.
The Company enters into foreign currency derivative contracts to hedge its net exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency caused by fluctuations in the value of the Act. Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, foreign exchange loss on foreign currency derivative contracts was $44.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
Gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements. During 2020, KCS entered into treasury lock agreements to hedge the U.S. Treasury benchmark interest rate associated with the anticipated refinancing of its aggregate $644.7 million of senior notes due in 2023. During the fourth quarter of 2022, KCS determined the forecasted refinancing was no longer considered probable to occur as financing costs have risen and the Company plans to extinguish the maturing debt with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. Accordingly, the Company removed the cash flow hedge designation of all tranches and derecognized the related unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The treasury lock instruments were settled and the Company recognized the gain on settlement of the interest rate derivative instruments of $259.3 million. Refer to Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 10, Derivative Instruments for more information.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense increased $114.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher pre-tax income resulting from the gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements in 2022 and higher merger costs included in 2021.


32

 Differences between the Company’s effective income tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 21% for 2022 and 2021 follow (in millions):
20222021Change
DollarsPercentDollarsPercentDollarsPercent
Income tax expense using the statutory rate in effect$275.0 21.0 %$155.0 21.0 %$120.0 — 
Tax effect of:
Difference between U.S. and foreign tax rate57.4 4.4 %51.9 7.0 %5.5 (2.6 %)
Inflation(25.8)(2.0 %)(10.4)(1.4 %)(15.4)(0.6 %)
Tax credits(11.9)(0.9 %)(11.7)(1.6 %)(0.2)0.7 %
Foreign exchange (i)9.4 0.7 %5.9 0.8 %3.5 (0.1 %)
State and local income tax provision, net9.1 0.7 %0.2 — 8.9 0.7 %
Withholding tax8.5 0.6 %8.5 1.2 %— (0.6 %)
Non-deductible executive compensation3.6 0.3 %14.7 2.0 %(11.1)(1.7 %)
Non-deductible transaction costs0.6 — 14.0 1.9 %(13.4)(1.9 %)
Global intangible low-taxed income tax, net0.1 — 0.4 0.1 %(0.3)(0.1 %)
Share-based compensation— — (25.2)(3.4 %)25.2 3.4 %
Other, net(0.1)0.1 %7.8 1.0 %(7.9)(0.9 %)
Income tax expense$325.9 24.9 %$211.1 28.6 %$114.8 (3.7 %)
_____________________
(i)The Company’s Mexican subsidiaries have net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets which, for Mexican income tax purposes, are subject to periodic revaluation based on changes in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. This revaluation creates fluctuations in the Company’s Mexican income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income and the amount of income taxes paid in Mexico. The Company also has net monetary assets denominated in Mexican pesos, that are subject to periodic re-measurement and settlement that creates fluctuations in foreign currency gains and losses in the consolidated statements of income. The Company hedges its net exposure to variations in earnings by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts involve the Company’s agreement to buy or sell pesos at an agreed-upon exchange rate on a future date. Refer to to Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 10, Derivative Instruments for further information.

Mexico Regulatory and Legal Updates
Hydrocarbons Law. On December 27,May 5, 2021, new legislation pertaining to the transport and handling of hydrocarbons in Mexico became effective. This legislation addresses a wide array of issues related to the storage, transportation and handling of petroleum products, as well as the illegal import of hydrocarbons. The legislation is being challenged in the court system by a number of stakeholders and is currently subject to a court-ordered injunction, resulting in a suspension of the implementation and enforcement of this new law. To date, this law has not had a material effect on the Company or its operations. However, the Company is continuing to monitor this law and is evaluating the effect on the Company and its business operations.
Inspections Related to Imports and Terminals. During 2021, the registrant filedMinistry of Infrastructure, Communications, and Transportation (“SICT”) and other relevant Mexican authorities increased inspections of imports and enforcement of various regulations and permit requirements related to terminal operations, with specific focus on imports of refined products and refined fuel transloading terminals and freight terminals, in order to prevent the illegal importation of refined fuel products. These inspections resulted in delays related to the import of shipments into Mexico as well as the shutdown of several refined fuel terminals in the second half of 2021. The SICT has instructed KCSM to provide railway service only to those terminals that have the applicable permits. If KCSM were to fail to comply with the SECSICT requirements, the Company could be subject to fines and potential revocation of the Concession. As a Form 15result, KCS’s freight revenue from refined products decreased significantly in the second half of 2021 and continued to decrease in 2022. See further discussion in the Revenues section.

33

Value-Added Tax Law. KCSM is not required to charge its customers value added tax (“VAT”) on international import or export transportation services, which prior to 2022 resulted in KCSM paying more VAT on its expenses than it collected from customers. These excess VAT payments are refundable by the Mexican government. Prior to 2019, Mexican companies could offset their monthly refundable VAT balance with respectother tax obligations. In January 2019, Mexico tax reform eliminated the ability to offset other tax obligations with refundable VAT. From 2019 through 2021, KCSM generated a refundable balance and filed refund claims with the Servicio de Administración Tributaria (“SAT”), which have not been refunded.
In November 2021, changes in the VAT law were enacted and became effective beginning January 1, 2022. These changes reduced the recoverability of VAT paid by KCSM on its expenditures that support international import transportation service revenues that are not subject to a VAT charge. VAT that is unrecoverable from the Mexican government results in incremental VAT expense for KCSM. Beginning in 2022, KCSM changed certain service offerings to either require VAT to be charged to customers on revenue, or impose a rate increase to offset the incremental VAT expense. These measures implemented by KCSM increased the VAT to be collected from customers and payable to the common stockMexican government.
As of December 31, 2022 and preferred stock, requesting that2021, the dutyKCSM refundable VAT balance was $78.9 million and $152.2 million, respectively. KCSM recovers the refundable VAT balance as VAT billed to customers exceed creditable VAT charged by vendors. KCSM has prior favorable Mexican court decisions and a legal opinion supporting its right under Mexican law to recover the refundable VAT balance from the Mexican government and believes the VAT to be fully recoverable. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, $78.9 million and $78.0 million, respectively, of the registrantrefundable VAT balance was classified as a short-term asset.
Carta Porte. In the second quarter of 2021, KCSM was notified by the SAT that shipping companies (cargo airlines, trucks, maritime, railroads, etc.) must include additional bill of lading information (referred to file reports under Section 13in Mexico as “Carta Porte”) with the invoice for all merchandise shipped in Mexico, including cross-border, international and Mexico domestic shipments. The Carta Porte requirements and deadline were modified several times throughout 2021 and 2022, with the most recent grace period extension to July 31, 2023. KCSM adapted its systems to comply with Carte Porte requirements, which delayed KCSM’s invoicing and cash collections by an average of approximately 40 days during 2022.
Failure to comply with Carta Porte requirements subsequent to the grace period could result in penalties and fines imposed by the SAT, shipping delays causing network congestion, and delayed invoicing and cash collections. In addition, in the event of repeated noncompliance with Carta Porte requirements, the SAT has the power to shut down operations of a company.
For a comparison of the Act with respect to such securities be terminated and the dutyCompany’s results of the registrant to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Act with respect to such securities be suspended.
This Amendment No. 1 on
Form 10-K/A amends
the Annual Report on Form
10-K
of Kansas City Southern (the “Company”)operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (“to the year ended December 31, 2020, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, Form
10-K”),
originallywhich was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 1, 2022.
In reliance upon
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
The Company focuses its cash and as permitted by Instruction G(3)capital resources on investing in the business, shareholder returns and optimizing its capital structure.
The Company believes, based on current expectations, that cash and other liquid assets, operating cash flows, and other available financing resources will be sufficient to Formfund anticipated operating expenses, capital expenditures, debt service and related costs, dividends, and other commitments for the foreseeable future.
10-K,
During 2022, the Company invested $505.3 million in capital expenditures. See Capital Expenditures section for further details.
The Company’s financing instruments contain restrictive covenants that limit or preclude certain actions; however, the covenants are structured such that the Company expects to have sufficient flexibility to conduct its operations. The Company has been, and expects to continue to be, in compliance with all of its debt covenants.

34

For discussion regarding the agreements representing the indebtedness of KCS, refer to Note 11, Short-Term Borrowings and Note 12, Long-Term Debt of the consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, periodic cash distributions may be made to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP. The amount of dividends paid is filingdependent upon cash generated, the timing of capital expenditures and the working capital needs of the Company. During 2022, KCS paid cash dividends of $880.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP. On February 1, 2023, KCS paid a cash dividend of $225.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
On December 31, 2022, total available liquidity (the cash balance plus revolving credit facility availability) was $807.6 million, compared to available liquidity at December 31, 2021 of $939.3 million.
As of December 31, 2022, the total cash and cash equivalents held outside of the U.S. in foreign subsidiaries was $125.4 million, after repatriating $272.0 million during 2022. The Company expects that this Amendment No.cash will be available to fund company operations without incurring significant additional income taxes.
On January 1, 2022, KCSM complied with Carta Porte requirements, providing customers with additional bill of lading information with the invoice for all merchandise shipped in Mexico. KCSM adapted its systems to comply with the Carta Porte requirements, which delayed KCSM’s invoicing and cash collections by an average of approximately 40 days during 2022, resulting in the accounts receivable as of December 31, 2022 to be elevated compared to historical balances. The Company is targeting its accounts receivable balance to decrease and return to historical balance levels during the first half of 2023.
Cash Flow Information and Contractual Obligations
Summary cash flow data follows (in millions):
20222021
Cash flows provided by (used for):
Operating activities$1,073.1 $935.8 
Investing activities(312.5)(531.2)
Financing activities(890.5)(251.2)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(1.8)(2.3)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(131.7)151.1 
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year339.3 188.2 
Cash and cash equivalents end of year$207.6 $339.3 
During 2022, cash and cash equivalents decreased $131.7 million as a result of the impacts discussed below.
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $137.3 million for 2022, as compared to 2021, primarily due to a reduction in cash payments for merger of costs of $2,253.1 million, partially offset by a reduction in merger termination fee reimbursements of $2,100.0 million.
Investing Cash Flows. Net cash used for investing activities decreased $218.7 million for 2022, as compared to 2021, due to cash received from the settlement of treasury lock agreements of $259.3 million, partially offset by a $32.2 million increase in capital expenditures. Additional information is included within the Capital Expenditure section of Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Financing Cash Flows. Net cash used for financing activities increased $639.3 million for 2022, as compared to 2021, due to an increase in cash dividend payments. In 2022, $880.0 million of dividends was paid to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
For a comparison of liquidity and capital resources and the Company’s cash flow activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2022.
10-K/A

35

Contractual Obligations. The following table outlines the material obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
Payments Due by Period
TotalLess Than
1 Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsMore than
5 years
Other
Long-term debt and short-term borrowings (including interest and finance lease obligations) (i)$6,894.7 $797.1 $271.2 $504.5 $5,321.9 $— 
Operating leases104.2 29.7 44.5 26.5 3.5 — 
Obligations due to uncertainty in income taxes (ii)1.3 — — — — 1.3 
Capital expenditure obligations (iii)313.1 121.5 127.0 64.6 — — 
Other contractual obligations (iv)450.8 130.9 149.0 152.9 18.0 — 
Total$7,764.1 $1,079.2 $591.7 $748.5 $5,343.4 $1.3 
_____________________
(i)For variable rate obligations, interest payments were calculated using the December 31, 2022 rate. For fixed rate obligations, interest payments were calculated based on the applicable rates and payment dates.
(ii)For amounts where the year of settlement cannot be reasonably estimated, obligations due to includeuncertainty in the 2021 Form
10-K
the Part III information not previouslyincome taxes are included in the 2021 FormOther column.
10-K. This
Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A
consists solely(iii)Capital expenditure obligations include minimum capital expenditures under the KCSM Concession agreement, the maximum funding amount of the preceding cover page, this explanatory note, the information required by Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of
Form 10-K, a
signature page and certifications required to be filed as exhibits. We are amending Part IV solely to add those certifications.
No attempt has been made in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A
to modify or update the other disclosures presentedinvestment in the 2021 FormCelaya-NBA Line Railway Bypass and related infrastructure, and other regulatory requirements.
10-K.(iv)Other contractual obligations include purchase commitments and certain maintenance agreements.
This Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A
does not reflect events occurring afterIn the filingnormal course of business, the Company enters into long-term contractual commitments for future goods and services needed for the operations of the 2021 Form
10-K.
Accordingly, this Amendment No. 1business. Such commitments are not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would have a material adverse effect on Form
10-K/A
should be read in conjunction with the 2021 Form
10-K
and the Company’s other filingsliquidity. Such commitments are not included in the above table.
The SICT requires KCSM to submit a three-year capital expenditures plan every three years. The most recent three-year plan was submitted in 2020 for the years 2021 — 2023. KCSM expects to continue capital spending at current levels in future years and will continue to have capital expenditure obligations past 2023, which are not included in the table above.
Capital Expenditures
KCS has funded capital expenditures with operating cash flows.
The following table summarizes capital expenditures by type for the SEC.years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (in millions):
In this Amendment No. 1 on Form
20222021
Roadway capital program$296.2 $258.8 
Locomotives and freight cars45.3 68.0 
Capacity112.6 101.1 
Information technology41.4 41.2 
Positive train control6.2 14.3 
Other3.6 6.0 
Total capital expenditures (accrual basis)505.3 489.4 
Change in capital accruals23.7 7.4 
Total cash capital expenditures$529.0 $496.8 
10-K/A,
we also refer

36

Property Statistics
The following table summarizes certain property statistics as of December 31:
20222021
Track miles of rail installed74 76 
Cross ties installed (thousands)561 494 

SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following is a description of the terms and conditions of the guarantees with respect to senior notes for which KCS is an issuer or provides full and unconditional guarantee.

Note Guarantees
As of December 31, 2022, KCS had outstanding $3,736.2 million principal amount of senior notes due through 2069. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”) had outstanding $2.7 million principal amount of senior notes due through 2045 (together, the “Senior Notes”). The senior notes for which KCS is the issuer are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior basis, by each of KCS’s current and future domestic consolidated subsidiaries that from time to time guarantees certain of KCS’s credit agreements, or any other debt of KCS, or any of KCS’s significant subsidiaries that is a guarantor (each, a “Guarantor Subsidiary,” and collectively, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). In addition, the senior notes for which KCSR is the issuer are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior basis, by KCS and each of its current and future domestic consolidated subsidiaries that from time to time guarantees KCSR’s credit agreement, or any other debt of KCSR or any of KCSR’s significant subsidiaries that is a Guarantor Subsidiary. The obligations of each Guarantor Subsidiary under its note guarantee are limited as “KCS”necessary to prevent such note guarantee from constituting a fraudulent conveyance under applicable law. A guarantee of the Senior Notes by KCS or a Guarantor Subsidiary is subject to release in the following circumstances: (i) the sale, disposition, exchange or other transfer (including through merger, consolidation, amalgamation or otherwise) of the capital stock of the Guarantor Subsidiary made in a manner not in violation of the indenture; (ii) the designation of the subsidiary as an “Unrestricted Subsidiary” under the indenture; (iii) the legal defeasance or covenant defeasance of the Senior Notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture; or (iv) the Guarantor Subsidiary ceasing to be KCS’s subsidiary as a result of any foreclosure of any pledge or security interest securing KCS’s Revolving Credit Facility or other exercise of remedies in respect thereof. There were no changes to the guarantor structure as a result of the merger with CP. The merger is further discussed within Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of Operations — Merger Agreement.
KCSM and any other foreign subsidiaries of KCS do not, and will not, guarantee the Senior Notes (“Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
The following tables present summarized financial information for KCS and the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis after intercompany transactions have been eliminated, including adjustments to remove the receivable and payable balances, investment in, and equity in earnings from the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.


37

Summarized Financial Information

Income StatementsKCS and Guarantor Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,
20222021
Revenues$1,796.9 $1,561.3 
Operating expenses1,158.6 1,200.8 
Operating income638.3 360.5 
Income before income taxes748.4 207.7 
Net income610.1 182.7 

Balance SheetsKCS and Guarantor Subsidiaries
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Assets:
Current assets$351.6 $524.6 
Property and equipment (including concession assets), net4,938.4 4,876.5 
Other non-current assets95.7 125.8 
Liabilities and equity:
Current liabilities$1,035.7 $316.5 
Non-current liabilities4,321.4 4,942.7 
Noncontrolling interest331.0 328.2 
Excluded from current assets in the table above are $276.0 million and $199.8 million of current intercompany receivables due to KCS and the Guarantor Subsidiaries from the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Excluded from current liabilities in the table above are $207.4 million and $267.5 million of current intercompany payables due to the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries from KCS and the Guarantor Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
The Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. The Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to the Senior Notes or the “Company.” Unlessindentures, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that KCS or the Guarantor Subsidiaries have to receive any assets of any of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Non-Guarantor Subsidiary, and the consequent rights of holders of Senior Notes to realize proceeds from the sale of any of a Non-Guarantor Subsidiary’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Non-Guarantor Subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Non-Guarantor Subsidiary. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to KCS or any Guarantor Subsidiary.
If a Guarantor Subsidiary were to become a debtor in a case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or encounter other financial difficulty, under federal or state fraudulent transfer or conveyance law, a court may avoid, subordinate or otherwise indicated herein, all page references containeddecline to enforce its guarantee of the Senior Notes. A court might do so if it is found that when such Guarantor Subsidiary entered into its guarantee of the Senior Notes, or in some states when payments became due under the Senior Notes, such Guarantor Subsidiary received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration and either:
• was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of such incurrence;
• was left with unreasonably small or otherwise inadequate capital to conduct its business; or

38

• believed or reasonably should have believed that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.
The court might also avoid the guarantee of the Senior Notes without regard to the above factors, if the court found that a Guarantor Subsidiary entered into its guarantee with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud its creditors.
A court would likely find that a Guarantor Subsidiary did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for its guarantee of the Senior Notes, if such Guarantor Subsidiary did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the funding made available by the issuance of the Senior Notes. If a court were to avoid a guarantee of the Senior Notes provided by a Guarantor Subsidiary, holders of the Senior Notes would no longer have any claim against such Guarantor Subsidiary. The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws will vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer or conveyance has occurred, such that the Company cannot predict what standards a court would use to determine whether or not a Guarantor Subsidiary was solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, that the guarantee of a Guarantor Subsidiary would not be subordinated to such Guarantor Subsidiary’s other debt. As noted above, each guarantee provided by a Guarantor Subsidiary includes a provision intended to limit the Guarantor Subsidiary’s liability to the maximum amount that it could incur without causing the incurrence of obligations under its guarantee to be a fraudulent transfer or conveyance. This provision may not be effective to protect those guarantees from being avoided under fraudulent transfer or conveyance law, or it may reduce that Guarantor Subsidiary’s obligation to an amount that effectively makes its guarantee worthless, and the Company cannot predict whether a court will ultimately find it to be effective.
On the basis of historical financial information, operating history and other factors, the Company believes that each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries, after giving effect to the issuance of its guarantee of the Senior Notes when such guarantee was issued, was not insolvent, did not have unreasonably small capital for the business in which it engaged and did not and has not incurred debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. The Company cannot predict, however, as to what standard a court would apply in making these determinations or that a court would agree with the Company’s conclusions in this Amendment No. 1 onregard.
Form 10-K/A are
to the pages of this Amendment No. 1 on
Form 10-K/A, and

not to the 2021
Form 10-K.
39

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
KCS’s accounting and financial reporting policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that the following accounting policies and estimates are critical to an understanding of KCS’s historical and future performance. Management has discussed the development and selection of the following critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of KCS’s Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the selection, application and disclosure of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates.
Capitalization, Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment (including Concession Assets)
Due to the highly capital intensive nature of the railroad industry, capitalization and depreciation of property and equipment are a substantial portion of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Net property and equipment, including concession assets, comprised approximately 88% of the Company’s total assets as of December 31, 2022, and related depreciation and amortization comprised approximately 18% of total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022.
KCS capitalizes costs for self-constructed additions and improvements to property including direct labor and material, indirect costs, and interest during long-term construction projects. The Company has a process in place to determine which costs qualify for capitalization, which requires judgment. Direct costs are charged to capital projects based on the work performed and the material used. Indirect costs are allocated to capital projects as a standard percentage, which is evaluated annually, and applied to direct labor and material costs. Asset removal activities are performed in conjunction with replacement activities; therefore, removal costs are estimated based on a standard percentage of direct labor and indirect costs related to capital replacement projects. For purchased assets, all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use are capitalized. Expenditures that significantly increase asset values, productive capacity, efficiency, safety or extend useful lives are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
KCS capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal-use software. Capitalized software costs are included in “Property and Equipment” on the consolidated balance sheets. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Property and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated primarily on the group method of depreciation, which the Company believes closely approximates a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets measured in years. The group method of depreciation applies a composite rate to classes of similar assets rather than to individual assets. Composite depreciation rates are based upon the Company’s estimates of the expected average useful lives of assets as well as expected net salvage value at the end of their useful lives. In developing these estimates, the Company utilizes periodic depreciation studies performed by an independent engineering firm. Depreciation rate studies are performed at least every three years for equipment and at least six years for road property (rail, ties, ballast, etc.). The depreciation studies take into account factors such as:
Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each asset class;
Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for the continued use of the assets;
Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices;
Historical and expected salvage to be received upon retirement;
Review of accounting policies and assumptions; and
Industry precedents and trends.
The depreciation studies may also indicate that the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient or in excess of the amount indicated by the study. Any such deficiency or excess is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining useful lives of the affected asset class, as determined by the study. The Company also monitors these factors in non-study years to determine if adjustments should be made to depreciation rates. The Company completed depreciation studies for KCSR in 2021 and KCSM in 2020. The impact of the KCSR study resulted in approximately $12.0 million in additional depreciation expense in 2022. The impact of the KCSM study was immaterial to the consolidated financial results for all periods presented.

Part III40

Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Also under the group method of depreciation, the cost of railroad property and equipment (net of salvage or sales proceeds) retired or replaced in the normal course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation with no gain or loss recognized. Actual historical costs are retired when available, such as with equipment costs. The use of estimates in recognizing the retirement of roadway assets is necessary as it is impractical to track individual, homogeneous network-type assets. Certain types of roadway assets are retired using statistical curves derived from the depreciation studies that indicate the relative distribution of the age of the assets retired. For other roadway assets, historical costs are estimated by deflating current costs using inflation indices and the estimated useful life of the assets as determined by the depreciation studies. The indices applied to the replacement value are selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the items comprising the roadway assets. Because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of assets is completely retired, the Company continually monitors the estimated useful lives of its assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset group to ensure the depreciation rates are appropriate.
Estimation of the average useful lives of assets and net salvage values requires management judgment. Estimated average useful lives may vary over time due to changes in physical use, technology, asset strategies and other factors that could have an impact on the retirement experience of the asset classes. Accordingly, changes in the assets’ estimated useful lives could significantly impact future periods’ depreciation expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $390.9 million. If the weighted average useful lives of assets were changed by one year, annual depreciation and amortization expense would change approximately $13.0 million.
Gains or losses on dispositions of land or non-group property and abnormal retirements of railroad property are recognized through income. A retirement of railroad property would be considered abnormal if the retirement meets each of the following conditions: (i) is unusual in nature, (ii) is significant in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through the depreciation studies. There were no significant gains or losses from abnormal retirements of property or equipment for the year ended December 31, 2022 or 2021.
Costs incurred by the Company to acquire the Concession rights and related assets, as well as subsequent improvements to the Concession assets, are capitalized and amortized using the group method of depreciation over the lesser of the current expected Concession term, including probable renewal of an additional 50-year term, or the estimated useful lives of the assets and rights. The Company’s ongoing evaluation of the useful lives of Concession assets and rights considers the aggregation of the following facts and circumstances:
The Company’s executive management is dedicated to ensuring compliance with the various provisions of the Concession and to maintaining positive relationships with the SICT and other Mexican federal, state, and municipal governmental authorities;
During the time since the Concession was granted, the relationships between KCSM and the various Mexican governmental authorities have matured and the guidelines for operating under the Concession have become more defined with experience;
There are no known supportable sanctions or compliance issues that would cause the SICT to revoke the Concession or prevent KCSM from renewing the Concession; and
KCSM operations are an integral part of the KCS operations strategy, and related investment analyses and operational decisions assume that the Company’s cross border rail business operates into perpetuity, and do not assume that Mexico operations terminate at the end of the current Concession term.
Based on the above factors, as of December 31, 2022, the Company continues to believe that it is probable that the Concession will be renewed for an additional 50-year term beyond the current term.
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, operating lease right-of-use assets and intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment and written down to fair value when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the long-lived assets, the carrying value would be reduced to the estimated fair value. Future cash flow estimates for an impairment review would be based on the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, which are the Company’s U.S. and Mexican operations. Management did not identify any indicators of impairment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
41


Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes represent a net asset or liability of the Company. For financial reporting purposes, management determines the current tax liability, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities, in accordance with the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. The provision for income taxes is biographicalthe sum of income taxes both currently payable and deferred into the future. Currently payable income taxes represent the liability related to the Company’s U.S., state and foreign income tax returns for the current year and anticipated tax payments resulting from income tax audits, while the net deferred tax expense or benefit represents the change in the balance of net deferred tax assets or liabilities as reported on the balance sheet. The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the estimated timing of reversal of differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of assets and liabilities for tax purposes as measured using the currently enacted tax rates that will be in effect at the time these differences are expected to reverse. Additionally, management estimates whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recognize any deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances are recorded as appropriate to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount considered likely to be realized.
Income tax expense related to Mexican operations has additional complexities such as the impact of exchange rate variations and inflation, both of which can have a significant impact on the effective income tax rate.
Management believes that the assumptions and estimates related to the provision for income taxes are critical to the Company’s results of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2022, income tax expense totaled $325.9 million. For every 1% change in the 2022 effective rate, income tax expense would have changed by approximately $13.1 million. For further information on the impact of foreign exchange fluctuation on income taxes, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Foreign Exchange Sensitivity.

OTHER MATTERS
Litigation. Occasionally, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings, regulatory examinations, investigations, administrative actions, and other legal matters, arising for each director who servesthe most part in the ordinary course of business, incidental to its operations. Included in these proceedings are various tort claims brought by current and former employees for job-related injuries and by third parties for injuries related to railroad operations. KCS aggressively defends these matters and has established liability provisions that management believes are adequate to cover expected costs. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is always uncertain. KCS believes it has valid defenses to the legal matters currently pending against it, is defending itself vigorously, and has recorded accruals determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, where appropriate. In making a determination regarding accruals, using available information, KCS evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party to and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of KCS’s defenses and consultation with legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the current estimates. It is possible that resolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to KCS’s consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in the opinion of the Company’s management, other than as described in Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies of the consolidated financial statements, such proceedings and actions should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s Boardconsolidated financial statements.
Inflation. U.S. GAAP require the use of Directors. Each directorhistorical cost, which does not reflect the effects of inflation on the replacement cost of property. Due to the capital intensive nature of KCS’s business, the replacement cost of these assets would be significantly higher than the amounts reported under the historical cost basis.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
KCS is exposed to certain market risks including interest rate, commodity, and foreign exchange risks and utilizes various financial instruments that have certain inherent market risks. These instruments have been entered into for hedging rather than trading purposes. The following information, together with information included in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and

42

Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 10, Derivative Instruments, describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risk to KCS.
The analysis presented below for each of the Company's market risks uses a sensitivity model based on hypothetical changes (increases or decreases) to market risks using defined parameters and assumptions to quantify the potential impacts to the consolidated statements of income. The hypothetical changes to market risks do not represent KCS's view of future market changes. The effect of a change in a particular assumption was electedcalculated without adjusting any other assumptions. These market risks and the potential impacts to servethe consolidated statements of income for a
one-year
term.the current year, have not materially fluctuated, individually or in the aggregate from the preceding year; thus only current year information is presented below.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. The Company is subject to interest rate risk associated with its debt. Changes in interest rates impact the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate debt, but there is no impact to current earnings or cash flow. Based upon the borrowing rates available to KCS and its subsidiaries for indebtedness with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of long-term debt was approximately $3,308.3 million and $4,311.1 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, compared with a carrying value of $3,779.6 million and $3,777.6 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Alternatively, changes in interest rates do not affect the fair value of variable rate debt, but affect future earnings and cash flows. The Company's floating-rate indebtedness includes commercial paper borrowings, and any outstanding borrowings under revolving credit facilities. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, KCS had no commercial paper or revolving credit facility borrowings outstanding.
Commodity Price Sensitivity. KCS periodically participates in diesel fuel purchase commitments and derivative financial instruments. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, KCS did not have any outstanding fuel derivative financial instruments. The Company also holds fuel inventories for use in operations. These inventories are not material to KCS’s overall financial position. Fuel costs are expected to reflect 2023 market conditions; however, fuel costs are unpredictable and subject to a variety of factors outside the Company’s control. Assuming annual consumption of 133 million gallons, a hypothetical 10 cent change in the price per gallon of fuel would cause a $13.3 million change in operating expenses. KCS mitigates the impact of increased fuel costs through fuel surcharge revenues from customers; however, in a period of volatile fuel prices or changing customer business mix, changes in fuel expense and fuel surcharge revenue may differ.
Foreign Exchange Sensitivity. KCS’s foreign subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency; however, a portion of the foreign subsidiaries’ revenues and expenses is denominated in Mexican pesos. Based on the volume of revenue and expense transactions denominated in Mexican pesos, revenue and expense fluctuations have historically offset.
The Company has exposure to fluctuations in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar due to its monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in Mexican pesos. Monetary assets and liabilities include cash, accounts receivable and payable and other items that will convert to cash in the future and are remeasured into dollars using the current exchange rate. The remeasurement and settlement of monetary assets and liabilities is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as foreign exchange gains and losses. At December 31, 2022, the Company had Ps.4,431.4 million of net monetary assets denominated in Mexican pesos, as monetary assets exceeded monetary liabilities.
The following table presents the potential impacts to the consolidated statements of income that would result from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate of one Mexican peso per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2022:
Lydia I. Beebe
Principal, LIBB Advisors, LLC
Age
: 69
Director Since
: 2017
Committees
: Compensation & Organization; Nominating & Corporate Governance
Experience
: Principal, LIBB Advisors, LLC, a corporate governance consulting firm; Senior Of Counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC from 2015 to 2017; Chief Corporate Governance Officer and Corporate Secretary, Chevron Corp., an energy company, from 1995 to 2015
Qualifications
: Ms. Beebe currently serves as the Principal of LIBB Advisors. She formerly served as Senior Of Counsel with the law firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, advising clients on a wide range of corporate governance issues, and as
co-chair
of the Stanford Institutional Investors Forum at Stanford Law School. She was the Chief Governance Officer for Chevron Corp. from 1995 to 2015 and served in various other legal roles since 1977. During this time, she gained valuable skills relating to executive leadership at a large publicly-traded company, including corporate governance matters that are important to our stockholders. She has extensive experience in a wide array of legal challenges that face a public company and its board of directors. Ms. Beebe also has expertise with boardroom issues as a director of other public companies. Through LIBB Advisors, she also routinely advises companies on corporate strategy and working with all stakeholders. In addition, she serves as an advisory board member of the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University. Ms. Beebe also served as chairman of the board of the Northern California Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Aemetis, Inc., an international renewable fuels and specialty chemical company; EQT Corporation, the largest producer of natural gas in the United States
Past Directorships
: HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1

Hypothetical Change in Exchange RateAmount of Gain (Loss)
Lu M. Córdova
Strategic Planning Projects, Governor’s Office, State of Colorado
Age
: 67
Director Since
: 2010
Committees
: Audit; Finance & Strategic Investment (Chair)
Experience
: Governor’s advisor, strategic planning and projects, State of Colorado, since August 2020; Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue from April 2019 to August 2020; CEO then Chair of CTEK, a
non-profit
organization, from June 2018 to present; President of Techstars Foundation, an American seed accelerator, from December 2017 to June 2018; Chief Executive Officer then Chair of Corlund Industries, L.L.C., an investment holding company, since 2005; General Manager of Almacen
Storage-US,
LLC, a Mexican REIT, from 2007 to 2019
Qualifications
: Ms. Córdova has extensive business leadership and entrepreneurial experience. She has strong management skills from leading business development for companies from
start-up
phase through high growth into the public market. Her former international executive roles with Techstars, McGraw-Hill Standard & Poor’s, a financial services company, and Excite@Home, a provider of broadband internet access, along with Chief Executive roles in private corporations, have given her extensive expertise in corporate finance and strategic planning. In addition, Ms. Córdova is a citizen of both the United States and Mexico and has significant cross-border operations experience. Ms. Córdova also has experience
Affected Line Item in the developmentConsolidated Statements of government financial and economic policies from her formal economics education, from ten years with the 10th District Federal Reserve Bank, ultimately as Chairman, from her public service with the state of Colorado, and from serving on compensation and audit committees.
Past Directorships
: 10th District Federal Reserve Bank basedIncome
Net monetary assets denominated in Kansas City; Euronet Worldwide, Inc.Mexican pesos at December 31, 2022:
Ps.4,431.4 million
Robert J. Druten (Chairman of the Board)
Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hallmark Cards, Inc.
Age
: 74
Director Since
: 2004
Committees
: Executive (Chair); Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)
Experience
: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hallmark Cards, Inc., a greeting card company, from 1994From Ps.19.4 to August 2006
Qualifications
: Mr. Druten has extensive executive experience in corporate finance and accounting developed during his tenure as a financial manager, and ultimately as Chief Financial Officer of Hallmark Cards, Inc. He has also served on the audit committees of other public companies, which gives him valuable knowledge and perspective. Mr. Druten also has experience in managing capital intensive operations, international operations and strategic planning.
Other Current Public Directorships
: EPR Properties, a real estate investment trust; Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. a diversified coal provider and marketer company.
Past Directorships
: American Italian Pasta Company
Ps.20.4
($11.2 million)Foreign exchange gain (loss)
Ps.4,431.4 millionFrom Ps.19.4 to Ps.18.4$12.5 millionForeign exchange gain (loss)
The Company’s Mexican subsidiaries have net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets which, for Mexican income tax purposes, are subject to periodic revaluation based on changes in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. This revaluation creates fluctuations in the Company’s Mexican income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income and the amount of income taxes paid in Mexico. The Company also has net monetary assets denominated in Mexican pesos, that are

43

2
subject to periodic re-measurement and settlement that creates fluctuations in foreign currency gains and losses in the consolidated statements of income.
The following table presents the potential impacts to the effective income tax rate and income tax expense that would result from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate of one Mexican peso at December 31, 2022:



Hypothetical Change in Exchange Rate
Antonio O. Garza, Jr.
Counsel, White & Case, LLP
Age
: 62
Director Since
: 2010
Committees
: Executive; Nominating & Corporate Governance
Experience
: Counsel, White & Case, LLP since 2009, an international law firm; United States Ambassador to Mexico from 2002 until January 2009
Qualifications
: Mr. Garza brings strong political, diplomatic and international business skills toIncrease (Decrease) in Effective Income Tax Rate
Amount of Expense (Benefit)Affected Line Item in the Board that he has developed through his experience as the United States’ Ambassador to Mexico from 2002 to 2009, and as an international business consultant and attorney. In addition, he has extensive experience in public policy development, strategic relationships with government officials and government relations experience including prior experience working with the Mexican government, which serves the Board well in its governance and strategic oversightConsolidated Statements of Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (“KCSM”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS. Mr. Garza also has a solid understanding of KCSM’s operations developed through his service as Chairman of its board of directors. Mr. Garza served as Chairman of the Texas Railroad Commission from 1998 to 2002; Texas’ Secretary of State from 1995-1997, and Cameron County Judge from 1988-1994.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Americas Technology Acquisition Corp., a Fifth Partners-sponsored acquisition company focused on media, technology and telecommunications; MoneyGram International, a money transfer company; The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., a transportation and freight manufacturer; Tricolor, a tech-enabled community development financial institution. Trustee, Southern Methodist University; Texas Tribune; Americas Society/Council of the Americas; American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico
Past Directorships
: BBVA Compass and the U.S. holding companies of BBVA; Basic Energy Services; Saavi Energía de México.
Income
From Ps.19.4 to Ps.20.4(0.2%)($2.7 million)Income tax expense (benefit)
From Ps.19.4 to Ps.18.4
David
Garza-Santos
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maquinaria Diesel SA de CV (“MADISA”)
Age
: 60
Director Since
: 2016
Committees
: Compensation & Organization
Experience
: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MADISA, a national distributor of Caterpillar and other heavy-duty equipment, since 1994
Qualifications
:
Mr. Garza-Santos
is a business and community leader in Monterrey, N.L. Mexico. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MADISA,
Mr. Garza-Santos
has experience in all phases of leading a company.
Mr. Garza-Santos
also sits on the board of directors of Promotora Ambiental, S.A.B. de C.V., a publicly-traded waste management services company based out of Monterrey, Mexico.
Mr. Garza-Santos
is a recognized leader in Monterrey, which provides the Company with additional insight and leadership on the business and political environment both regionally in Monterrey as well as nationally across Mexico.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Promotora Ambiental, S.A.B. de C.V.; Grupo Financiero Banorte (BANORTE), a Mexican banking and financial services holding company; Fibra Mty. SAPI de CV, a Mexican REIT
0.2%
$2.9 millionIncome tax expense (benefit)
The Company hedges its net exposure to variations in earnings by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts involve the Company’s agreement to buy or sell pesos at an agreed-upon exchange rate on a future date. These derivative instruments have historically offset the effects of foreign currency changes resulting in minimal impact to net income.
3
At December 31, 2022, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $535.0 million, which matured during January 2023 and obligated the Company to sell a total of Ps.11,235.2 million at a weighted-average rate of Ps.21.0 to each U.S. dollar. During January 2023, the Company entered into offsetting contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $581.4 million, which matured during January 2023 and obligated the Company to purchase a total of Ps.11,235.2 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of Ps.19.3 to each U.S. dollar, resulting in cash paid of $46.4 million. Given the settlement during January 2023, the Company believes there was minimal market risk associated with these contracts at December 31, 2022.
During January 2023, the Company entered into several foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $250.0 million, maturing during 2023 and 2024. These contracts obligated the Company to sell a total of Ps.5,114.6 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of Ps.20.5 to each U.S. dollar.

The following table presents the potential impacts to the consolidated statements of income that would result from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate of one Mexican peso at maturity date for the foreign currency forward contracts entered into during January 2023 and outstanding as of the date of this filing:


Aggregate notional amount:
Janet H. Kennedy
Vice President, North America Regions, Google Cloud at Google
Age
: 61
Director Since
: 2019
Committees
: Finance & Strategic Investment
Experience
: Vice President, North America Regions, Google Cloud at Google, a suiteHypothetical Change in Exchange Rate
Amount of cloud computing services, since July 2019; Partner/Principal, Americas Advisory Digital Transformation Leader for Ernst & Young, a multinational professional services company providing financial audit, tax, consulting and advisory services, from November 2018 to June 2019; Vice President, US Digital Transformation for Microsoft Corp., an American multinational technology company that develops, manufactures, licenses, supports, and sells computer software, consumer electronics, and personal computers, from 2018 to May 2019; President, Microsoft Canada, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microsoft Corp., from 2013 to 2017; Vice President, U.S. Enterprise for Microsoft Corp. from 2009 to 2013
Qualifications
: As Vice President, North America Regions, Google Cloud at Google, Ms. Kennedy is focused on helping clients to leverage disruptive thinking and emerging technologies to develop and execute their digital transformation strategies. Her responsibilities include building the next iteration of the overall Digital Transformation Strategy for Americas Advisory, growing and building practices including Cloud, RPA, Blockchain and new emerging technologies. In her role as US Digital Transformation for Microsoft Corp., Ms. Kennedy was responsible for both internal and external digital transformations for Microsoft’s customers and partners. The experience and insights she has from these roles provide her with a unique and valuable perspective to help KCS in this new digital age. Ms. Kennedy gained valuable executive leadership skills and extensive experienceGain (Loss)
Affected Line Item in the compensation, business development and strategy areas while serving as PresidentConsolidated Statements of Microsoft Canada, a subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation. In addition, Ms. Kennedy’s background at Microsoft has given her significant insight and knowledge relevantIncome
$250.0 millionFrom Ps.20.5 to cybersecurity issues and technological developments affecting the transportation industry. Ms. Kennedy also held other leadership positions at Microsoft, which provided experience in sales and marketing of business solutions as the Vice President of Enterprise Customers and expertise in the transportation industry as Director of Transportation, Retail and Hospitality Industry. Ms. Kennedy was active in several industry groups in Canada including the Information Technology Association of Canada, where she served as a director.Ps.21.5$11.7 millionForeign exchange gain (loss)
$250.0 millionFrom Ps.20.5 to Ps.19.5($12.8 million)Foreign exchange gain (loss)
The Company has not designated these foreign currency derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The foreign currency derivative instruments will be measured at fair value each period and any change in fair value will be recognized in foreign exchange gain (loss) within the consolidated statements of income.

4
44

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Mitchell J. Krebs
President and Chief Executive Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc.
Age
: 50
Director Since
: 2017
Committees: Audit; Finance & Strategic Investment
Experience
: President and Chief Executive Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc., a precious metals mining company, since 2011; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc. between 2008 and 2011
Qualifications
: Mr. Krebs is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc. (NYSE: CDE) and also serves on its board of directors. As the leader of a publicly-traded company, Mr. Krebs has direct experience and brings valuable insights into the issues that are important to public company stockholders. Mr. Krebs was Coeur Mining’s Chief Financial Officer for several years, providing additional significant financial expertise to our Board and adding another financial expert to our Audit Committee. In addition, Coeur Mining has significant mining operations throughout North America, including Mexico, giving Mr. Krebs experience that will enhance the Board’s ability to oversee the Company’s execution of its strategy and achievement of its long-range objectives for its Mexican operations. Mr. Krebs also has experience in the corporate finance and asset management areas, providing the Board with additional expertise in managing and strengthening the Company’s financial and capital profile.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Coeur Mining, Inc.
Henry J. Maier
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, FedEx Ground, a package shipping company, which is a subsidiary of FedEx Corp.
Age
: 68
Director Since
: 2017
Committees
: Compensation & Organization (Chair); Finance & Strategic Investment
Experience
: President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Ground, a subsidiary of FedEx Corp., since 2013; Executive Vice President, Strategic Planning, Communications, and Contractor Relations for FedEx Corp. between 2009 and 2013
Qualifications
: Mr. Maier is President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Ground, a $20.5 billion subsidiary of FedEx Corp. As the leader of FedEx Ground, he has developed a deep and strong skill set relating to strategy development and execution. Prior to assuming his current role in 2013, Mr. Maier held various other senior executive roles in the areas of marketing, communications and strategic planning. Mr. Maier’s executive leadership skills strengthen the Board’s ability to oversee the execution of our Company’s strategy, including fostering a culture that demands performance excellence. Mr. Maier has spent his entire career working in various segments of the transportation industry, giving him tremendous insight into many areas important to the Company.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Carparts.com; CalAmp, a global technology solutions company; C.H. Robinson, a multimodal transportation services and third party logistics provider.
5

Page
Thomas A. McDonnell
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, a
non-profit
foundation
Age
: 76
Director Since
: 2003
Committees
: Audit (Chair); Finance & Strategic Investment; Nominating & Corporate Governance
Experience
: President and Chief Executive Officer of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014; Chief Executive Officer of DST Systems, Inc., a provider of advisory, technology and operations, from 1984 until September 2012
Qualifications
: Mr. McDonnell is an experienced business leader with the skills necessary to serve as a director of the Company. He served for many years as the Chief Executive Officer of DST Systems, Inc., a publicly-traded company, and has developed strong business leadership skills in this role. Mr. McDonnell has extensive executive experience in corporate finance and accounting, technology, international operations and strategic planning. His service on other boards has provided him with a broad business background and leadership skills that are highly valued by the Company’s Board.
Other Current Public Directorships
: Euronet Worldwide, Inc., a provider of electronic payment services; ENDI Corp, an investment management provider.
Past Directorships
: Commerce Bancshares, Inc.; DST Systems, Inc.; Garmin Ltd; Cerner Corporation; BHA Group Holdings, Inc.; Puritan Bennett/Nellcor Puritan Bennett; Computer Sciences Corporation; Innovative Software; Informix, Cohanzick HyFund Ltd.; Blue Valley Ban Corp.46
Financial Statement Schedules:
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
President and Chief Executive Officer, Kansas City Southern
Age
: 65
Director Since
: 2016
Committees: Executive
Experience
: Chief Executive Officer of KCS since July 1, 2016; President of KCS since March 1, 2015; Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing of KCS from October 16, 2008 through March 1, 2015; Chief Executive Officer of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS, since July 1, 2016; President of KCSR since March 1, 2015
Qualifications
: Mr. Ottensmeyer has a broad range of experience from the various senior executive positions he has held at KCS over the last ten years. During his time as Executive Vice President Sales and Marketing, he developed a deep understanding of the Company’s strategy as well as its customers and growth opportunities. He also has a very extensive understanding of financial matters, which helped him lead KCS’s finance department during his time as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Ottensmeyer came to KCS in 2006 with substantial experience in financial matters from serving in various financial leadership roles, including treasurer and chief financial officer positions with his prior employers.

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, are insignificant, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Organization Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”), a Finance and Strategic Investment Committee (the “Finance Committee”) and an Executive Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted written charters for the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Finance Committees detailing all of their responsibilities, copies of which are available in the “Investors” - “Corporate Governance” – “Governance Documents” section under the “About Us” tab of our website at www.kcsouthern.com.
6
45

Table of Contents
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Audit CommitteeThe management of Kansas City Southern is responsible for establishing and Audit Committee Financial Experts
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. KCS’s internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Committee Members
: Thomas McDonnell (Chair); Lu Córdova; Mitchell Krebs
Primary responsibilities
:
MonitorsUnder the qualitysupervision and integritywith the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting process,as of December 31, 2022, based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework(2013) (commonly referred to as the COSO Framework). Based on its evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial statements, and systemsreporting was effective as of internal accounting controls. In fulfilling this responsibility,December 31, 2022, based on the Audit Committee regularly meets with management and withcriteria outlined in the COSO Framework.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which immediately follows this report.


46

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To theBoard of Directors and Stockholder of Kansas City Southern

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Southern and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to reviewas the Company’s annual“consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements quarterlyreferred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, reports onfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and other information included in SEC filings. The Audit Committee, or the Chair ofaccompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Audit Committee as authorized inCompany’s consolidated financial statements and on the Audit Committee charter, also meets with management to review and discuss quarterly earnings press releases and otherCompany's internal control over financial information provided to investors and analysts.
Appoints, compensates, retains, and oversees the independent registeredreporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm selectedregistered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to auditbe independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. In fulfilling this responsibility, at least annually,Our audits also included evaluating the Audit Committee evaluatesaccounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the independence, professional qualifications, and performanceoverall presentation of the Company’s independent registered publicconsolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.



47

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting firmprinciples. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the lead engagement partner.company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Direct Costs that are Capitalized to Self-Constructed Property and Equipment (including Concession Assets)

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company capitalizes costs for self-constructed additions and improvements to property, including direct labor and material, indirect costs, and interest during long-term construction projects. Expenditures that significantly increase asset values, productive capacity, efficiency, safety, or extend useful lives are capitalized. As disclosed by management, direct costs are charged to capital projects based on the work performed and the material used. Management has a process in place to determine which costs qualify for capitalization, which requires judgment. For the year-ended December 31, 2022, the Company capitalized costs of $505.3 million.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to direct costs that are capitalized to self-constructed property and equipment (including concession assets) is a critical audit matter are (i) the significance of direct costs and complexities in self-constructed property and equipment (including concession assets); (ii) the significant judgment by management in determining whether direct costs qualify for capitalization; and (iii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating evidence related to the capitalization of direct costs.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the capitalization of direct costs to self-constructed property and equipment (including concession assets). These procedures also included, among others, selecting a sample of direct costs and (i) obtaining evidence to support the accuracy of capitalized additions to self-constructed properties based on the work performed and the material used and (ii) evaluating whether these costs qualify for capitalization.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 3, 2023

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

48

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions)
Revenues$3,370.4 $2,947.3 $2,632.6 
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits567.0 522.0 476.5 
Purchased services225.9 211.8 198.1 
Fuel461.7 313.6 219.8 
Equipment costs91.4 82.2 85.8 
Depreciation and amortization390.9 365.8 357.9 
Materials and other359.8 304.1 260.9 
Merger costs, net46.6 264.0 — 
Write-off of software development costs— — 13.6 
Restructuring charges— — 17.0 
Total operating expenses2,143.3 2,063.5 1,629.6 
Operating income1,227.1 883.8 1,003.0 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of affiliates8.7 16.7 (1.4)
Interest expense(156.6)(156.0)(150.9)
Foreign exchange loss(33.2)(9.0)(29.6)
Gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements259.3 — — 
Other income, net4.4 2.6 2.1 
Income before income taxes1,309.7 738.1 823.2 
Income tax expense325.9 211.1 204.1 
Net income983.8 527.0 619.1 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest1.6 1.8 2.1 
Net income attributable to Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries982.2 525.2 617.0 
Preferred stock dividends— 0.2 0.2 
Net income available to common stockholder(s)$982.2 $525.0 $616.8 
Reviews areasSee accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


49

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
 (In millions)
Net income$983.8 $527.0 $619.1 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain on interest rate derivative instruments, net of tax of $42.4 million, $4.6 million and $7.5 million159.5 17.2 28.1 
Reclassification of interest rate derivative instruments gain, net of tax of $(54.5) million(204.8)— — 
Reclassification adjustment from cash flow hedges included in net income, net of tax of $0.5 million for each year presented1.9 2.0 1.9 
Foreign currency translation adjustments0.6 (0.2)(0.5)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(42.8)19.0 29.5 
Comprehensive income941.0 546.0 648.6 
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest1.6 1.8 2.1 
Comprehensive income attributable to Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries$939.4 $544.2 $646.5 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial riskstatements.


50

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
20222021
(In millions, except share
and per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$207.6 $339.3 
Accounts receivable, net543.6 271.0 
Materials and supplies174.2 131.0 
Other current assets138.8 142.1 
Total current assets1,064.2 883.4 
Operating lease right-of-use assets100.9 69.6 
Investments55.8 48.3 
Property and equipment (including concession assets), net9,362.4 9,209.3 
Other assets94.1 217.5 
Total assets$10,677.4 $10,428.1 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Long-term debt due within one year$655.0 $8.8 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities635.7 479.7 
Total current liabilities1,290.7 488.5 
Long-term operating lease liabilities71.5 46.4 
Long-term debt3,124.6 3,768.8 
Deferred income taxes1,237.1 1,213.7 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits158.7 178.1 
Total liabilities5,882.6 5,695.5 
Stockholder’s equity:
$0.01 par, common stock, 100 shares authorized, 100 shares issued; 100 shares outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021— — 
Additional paid-in capital860.6 860.6 
Retained earnings3,626.6 3,524.4 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(23.4)19.4 
Total stockholder’s equity4,463.8 4,404.4 
Noncontrolling interest331.0 328.2 
Total equity4,794.8 4,732.6 
Total liabilities and equity$10,677.4 $10,428.1 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


51

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions)
Operating activities:
Net income$983.8 $527.0 $619.1 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization390.9 365.8 357.9 
Deferred income taxes35.0 23.2 49.4 
Equity in net (earnings) losses of affiliates(8.7)(16.7)1.4 
Share-based compensation— 24.5 22.9 
Loss on foreign currency derivative instruments44.3 3.7 22.5 
Foreign exchange (gain) loss(11.1)5.3 7.1 
Merger costs, net46.6 264.0 — 
Restructuring charges— — 17.0 
Gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements(259.3)— — 
Write-off of software development costs— — 13.6 
Distributions from affiliates6.5 12.0 4.5 
Settlement of foreign currency derivative instruments(5.1)(1.9)(20.0)
Cash payments for merger costs(34.1)(2,287.2)— 
Reimbursement of merger termination fees— 2,100.0 — 
Changes in working capital items:
Accounts receivable(269.1)(30.6)25.5 
Materials and supplies(42.1)1.9 21.7 
Other current assets89.3 (54.7)(66.0)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities98.8 (9.9)6.0 
Other, net7.4 9.4 (2.6)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,073.1 935.8 1,080.0 
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures(529.0)(496.8)(411.9)
Settlement of treasury lock agreements259.3 — — 
Purchase or replacement of assets under operating leases— — (78.2)
Property investments in MSLLC(27.1)(24.2)(24.8)
Investments in and advances to affiliates(8.5)(7.8)(7.4)
Proceeds from disposal of property6.5 6.4 12.9 
Other, net(13.7)(8.8)(16.6)
Net cash used for investing activities(312.5)(531.2)(526.0)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt— — 545.6 
Repayment of long-term debt(10.5)(7.9)(18.0)
Dividends paid(880.0)(188.0)(152.3)
Shares repurchased— — (888.9)
Debt issuance and retirement costs paid— — (6.6)
Cash settlement of stock options— (75.2)— 
Proceeds from employee stock plans— 19.9 9.9 
Net cash used for financing activities(890.5)(251.2)(510.3)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(1.8)(2.3)(4.3)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Net increase (decrease) during each year(131.7)151.1 39.4 
At beginning of year339.3 188.2 148.8 
At end of year$207.6 $339.3 $188.2 
Supplemental information continued on next page.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


52

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
Continued from previous page.
202220212020
(In millions)
Supplemental cash flow information
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital expenditures accrued but not yet paid at end of year$0.6 $14.1 $21.5 
Other investing activities accrued but not yet paid at the end of the year32.4 35.6 31.9 
Finance lease obligations incurred9.1 11.5 0.8 
Non-cash asset acquisitions0.4 4.2 2.8 
Dividends accrued but not yet paid at end of year— — 40.6 
Cash payments:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$152.2 $152.7 $144.5 
Income tax payments, net of refunds275.8 173.0 182.3 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


53

Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(In millions, except per share amounts)
$25 Par
Preferred
Stock
$.01 Par
Common
Stock
Additional Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-
controlling
Interest
Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2019$5.6 $1.0 $843.7 $3,601.3 $(29.1)$323.4 $4,745.9 
Net income617.0 2.1 619.1 
Other comprehensive income29.5 29.5 
Contributions from noncontrolling interest0.9 0.9 
Dividends on common stock ($1.64/share)— (153.7)(153.7)
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)(0.2)(0.2)
Share repurchases(0.2)(0.1)(51.3)(844.8)(896.4)
Forward contract for accelerated share repurchases(75.0)(75.0)
Settlement of forward contract for accelerated share repurchases82.5 82.5 
Options exercised and stock subscribed, net of shares withheld for employee taxes— 6.2 6.2 
Share-based compensation24.8 24.8 
Balance at December 31, 20205.4 0.9 830.9 3,219.6 0.4 326.4 4,383.6 
Net income525.2 1.8 527.0 
Other comprehensive income19.0 19.0 
Dividends on common stock ($1.62/share)— (147.3)(147.3)
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($0.75/share)(0.2)(0.2)
Share repurchases— — (2.1)(72.9)(75.0)
Settlement of forward contract for accelerated share repurchases75.0 75.0 
Options exercised and stock subscribed, net of shares withheld for employee taxes— (0.2)(0.2)
Share-based compensation80.4 80.4 
Replacement of equity share awards with liability awards(54.5)(54.5)
Cash settlement of stock options(75.2)(75.2)
Recapitalization of stock(5.4)(0.9)6.3 — 
Balance at December 31, 2021— — 860.6 3,524.4 19.4 328.2 4,732.6 
Net income982.2 1.6 983.8 
Other comprehensive loss(42.8)(42.8)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest1.2 1.2 
Dividends to Canadian Pacific(880.0)(880.0)
Balance at December 31, 2022— — $860.6 $3,626.6 $(23.4)$331.0 $4,794.8 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


54

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Description of the Business
Kansas City Southern (“KCS” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with principal operations in rail transportation.
On September 15, 2021, KCS and CP entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) and on December 14, 2021, CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS. Each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of KCS that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive (1) 2.884 common shares of CP and (2) $90 in cash (together, the “Merger Consideration”), and each share of preferred stock, par value $25 per share, that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive $37.50 in cash. The Merger Consideration value received by KCS stockholders was $301.20 per KCS common share. As CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS, earnings per share data is not presented because the Company does not have any outstanding or issued publicly traded stock. The merger is further discussed in Note 3, Merger Agreement.
The Company is engaged in the freight rail transportation business operating through a single coordinated rail network under one reportable business segment. The Company generates revenues and cash flows by providing its customers with freight delivery services both within its regions, and throughout North America through connections with other Class I rail carriers. KCS’s customers conduct business in a number of different industries, including electric-generating utilities, chemical and petroleum products, paper and forest products, agriculture and mineral products, automotive products, and intermodal transportation.
The primary subsidiaries of the Company consist of the following:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary. KCSR is a U.S. Class I railroad that services the midwest and southeast regions of the United States;
Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (“KCSM”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary which operates under the rights granted by the concession acquired from the Mexican government in 1997 (the “Concession”) as described below;
Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary; which wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);
Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a seventy percent-owned consolidated affiliate. MSLLC owns the former KCSR rail line between Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport, Louisiana, which is the portion of the rail line between Dallas, Texas and Meridian known as the “Meridian Speedway”.
Including equity investments in:
Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), a fifty percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate which provides ocean to ocean freight and passenger services along the Panama Canal;
TFCM, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“TCM”), a forty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that operates a bulk liquid terminal in San Luis Potosí, Mexico;
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty-five percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary services in the greater Mexico City area; and
PTC-220, LLC (“PTC-220”), a thirteen percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate that holds the licenses to large blocks of radio spectrum and other assets for positive train control.
The KCSM Concession. KCSM holds a concession (the “Concession”) from the Mexican government until June 2047, which is renewable under certain conditions for additional periods of up to 50 years under the Concession. The Concession is to provide freight transportation services over north-east rail lines which are a primary commercial corridor of the Mexican railroad system. KCSM has the right to use, but does not own, all track and buildings that are necessary for the rail lines’ operation. KCSM is required to pay the Mexican government an annual concession duty equal to 1.25% of gross revenues during the Concession period. On July 14, 2022, KCSM reached an agreement with the Mexican Ministry of Infrastructure, Communications and Transportation (“SICT”) to fund a new investment in the Celaya-NBA Line Railway Bypass and related

55

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
infrastructure in an amount not to exceed Ps.4.0 billion (approximately $200.0 million USD). In exchange for the investment, the SICT agreed to amend KCSM’s Concession Title effective July 14, 2022, to extend the exclusivity rights granted to KCSM (subject to certain trackage and haulage rights granted to other concessionaires) for an additional period of 10 years. Under this amendment, KCSM’s exclusivity will now expire in 2037.
Employees and Labor Relations.KCSR participates in industry-wide multi-employer bargaining as a member of the National Carriers’ Conference Committee, as well as local bargaining for agreements that are limited to KCSR's property. Approximately 71% of KCSR employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. During 2022, 5-year agreements were reached voluntarily or through the legislation process covering all of the participating U.S. unions for the 2020 national bargaining round. 
KCSM union employees are covered by one labor agreement, which was signed on April 16, 2012, between KCSM Servicios S.A. de C.V., a previously wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS that was merged into KCSM in 2021, and the Sindicato de Trabajadores Ferrocarrileros de la República Mexicana (“Mexican Railroad Union”). Upon the merger between KCSM Servicios and KCSM, these union employees continue to be covered under this existing labor agreement, which remains in effect during the period of the Concession, for the purpose of regulating the relationship between the parties. Approximately 76% of KCSM employees are covered by this labor agreement.
Union labor negotiations have not historically resulted in any strike, boycott, or other disruption in the Company’s business operations.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented using the accrual basis of accounting and include the Company and overseesits majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the Company’s enterprise risk management program. In fulfilling these responsibilities,current year presentation.
The equity method of accounting is used for all entities in which the Audit Committee meets with managementCompany or its subsidiaries have significant influence, but not a controlling interest. The Company evaluates less-than-majority-owned investments for consolidation pursuant to reviewconsolidation and discuss risk assessment and risk management policies, including the Company’s significant risk exposures and steps taken by management to monitor and mitigate such exposures.
Required Qualifications
:
Consists of three Directors elected by the Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Nominating Committee, to serve
one-year
terms.
All members of the Audit Committee are independent (as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards) and meet the additional independence standards in Rule
10A-3
under the Exchange Act.
variable interest entity guidance. The Company does not limithave any less-than-majority-owned investments requiring consolidation.
In November 2021, the numberFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2021-10, Government Assistance (Topic 832), Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance. The standard is intended to increase transparency of public company audit committeesgovernment assistance by requiring disclosures of the following: (1) the types of assistance, (2) an entity’s accounting for the assistance, and (3) the effect of the assistance on which the members of our Audit Committee may serve. However,entity’s financial statements. This ASU was effective for any director to simultaneously servethe Company on our Audit CommitteeJanuary 1, 2022 and the audit committeesCompany adopted the ASU prospectively. See Note 7, Property and Equipment for the newly required disclosure.
Use of more than two other public companies, the Board must affirmatively determine that such simultaneous service will not impair the director’s ability to effectively serve on our Audit Committee.
Estimates.The Board has determined that two of the Audit Committee members, Mr. McDonnell and Mr. Krebs, are “audit committee financial experts” as that term is defined in applicable securities regulations. The Board made this determination for Mr. McDonnell based upon his prior experience as the Chief Executive Officer of DST Systems, Inc., his accounting and financial education, his experience actively supervising others performingreporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include those related to the recoverability and useful lives of assets and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition. The primary performance obligation for the Company is to move customers’ freight from an origin to a destination. A performance obligation is created when a customer under a transportation contract or auditing functions,public tariff submits a bill of lading for the transport of goods. The Company recognizes revenue proportionally as a shipment moves from origin to destination, using the distance shipped to measure progress, as the customer simultaneously receives and his pastconsumes the benefit over time. Related expenses are recognized as incurred. Revenue associated with in-transit shipments at period end is

56

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and current memberships on audit committees of other public companies. The Board made this determination for Mr. KrebsSubsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
recognized based on his current positionthe distance shipped as President and Chief Executive Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc., his previous position as Chief Financial Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc., his accounting and financial education, and his experiencethe balance sheet date. Payment is received at the time or shortly after the performance obligation is satisfied.
The transaction price is generally in the corporateform of a fixed fee determined at the inception of the transportation contract or the inception of the bill of lading. Certain customer agreements have variable consideration that are based on milestone achievements in the form of rebates, discounts or incentives. The Company makes judgments to determine whether the variable consideration is probable of occurring and should be included in the estimated transaction price at the beginning of the period to apply a more consistent rate throughout the year based on an analysis of historical experience with the customer, forecasted shipments and other economic indicators. The Company adjusts the estimate on a quarterly basis.
Other revenues, including switching, storage, and demurrage are distinct services and are recognized as services are performed or as contractual obligations are fulfilled. The consideration for other revenue is allocated between the separate services based upon the stand-alone transaction price.
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss). For financial reporting purposes, foreign subsidiaries maintain records in U.S. dollars, which is the functional currency. The dollar is the currency that reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to the entity. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican pesos (“pesos” or “Ps.”) are remeasured into U.S. dollars (“dollars”) using current exchange rates. The difference between the exchange rate on the date of the transaction and the exchange rate on the settlement date, or balance sheet date if not settled, is included in the income statement as foreign exchange gain or loss.
Cash Equivalents. Short-term liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable, net. Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts as determined by historical experience and adjusted for economic uncertainties, known trends, and reasonable supportable forecasts. Accounts are charged to the allowance when a customer enters bankruptcy, when an account has been transferred to a collection agent or submitted for legal action, or when a customer is significantly past due and all available means of collection have been exhausted. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the allowance for estimated credit losses was $12.2 million and $12.1 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, bad debt expense was $8.7 million, $3.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
Materials and Supplies. Materials and supplies consisting of diesel fuel, items to be used in the maintenance of rolling stock and items to be used in the maintenance or construction of road property are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.
Derivative Instruments. Derivatives are measured at fair value and recorded on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded either through current earnings or as other comprehensive income (loss), depending on hedge designation. Gains and losses on derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and are reclassified into earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flow of the hedged item.
Property and Equipment (including Concession Assets). KCS capitalizes costs for self-constructed additions and improvements to property including direct labor and material, indirect costs, and interest during long-term construction projects. For purchased assets, all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use are capitalized. Expenditures that significantly increase asset values, productive capacity, efficiency, safety or extend useful lives are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The Company has a process to determine which costs qualify for capitalization, which requires judgment.
KCS capitalizes certain costs incurred with developing or obtaining internal-use software. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stage, as well as maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred.
Property and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated primarily on the group method of depreciation, which the Company believes closely approximates a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets measured in years. The

57

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
group method of depreciation applies a composite rate to classes of similar assets rather than to individual assets. Composite depreciation rates are based upon the Company’s estimates of the expected average useful lives of assets as well as expected net salvage value at the end of their useful lives. In developing these estimates, the Company utilizes periodic depreciation studies performed by an independent engineering firm. Depreciation rate studies are performed at least every three years for equipment and at least six years for road property (rail, ties, ballast, etc.). The Company completed depreciation studies for KCSR in 2021 and KCSM in 2020. The impact of the KCSR study resulted in approximately $12.0 million in additional depreciation expense in 2022. The impact of the KCSM study was immaterial to the consolidated financial results for all periods presented.
Under the group method of depreciation, the cost of railroad property and equipment (net of salvage or sales proceeds) retired or replaced in the normal course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation with no gain or loss recognized. Gains or losses on dispositions of land or non-group property and abnormal retirements of railroad property are recognized through income. A retirement of railroad property would be considered abnormal if the cause of the retirement is unusual in nature, is significant in amount, and varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through the depreciation studies.
Costs incurred by the Company to acquire the Concession rights and related assets, as well as subsequent improvements to the Concession assets, are capitalized and amortized using the group method of depreciation over the lesser of the current expected Concession term, including probable renewal of an additional 50-year term, or the estimated useful lives of the assets and rights.
.Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets, including property and equipment, operating lease right-of-use assets and intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment and written down to fair value when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the long-lived assets, the carrying value would be reduced to the estimated fair value. Future cash flow estimates for an impairment review would be based on the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, which are the Company’s U.S. and Mexican operations. During the year ended December 31, 2020, $13.6 million of expense was recognized related to costs previously capitalized for the development of internal-use software. The development of the software was cancelled prior to completion and had no further use. Other than the abnormal impairment related to the implementation of Precision Scheduled Railroading (“PSR”) for the year ended 2020, and the aforementioned software impairment, management did not identify any indicators of impairment for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Leases. The Company leases transportation equipment, as well as office and other operating facilities, under various finance and operating leases. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the implicit rate is not readily determinable in most of the Company’s lease agreements, the Company uses its estimated secured incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of approximately 1 year to 7 years, which may include the option to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain the Company will exercise that option. The Company does not separately identify lease and nonlease components (i.e. maintenance costs) except for fleet vehicles and real estate. The Company does not have lease agreements with residual value guarantees, sale leaseback terms or material restrictive covenants. Additionally, short-term leases and leases with variable lease costs are immaterial, and the Company does not have any sublease arrangements.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in business combinations. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the goodwill balance was $13.2 million, which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed at least annually, or more frequently as indicators warrant, for impairment. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units’ fair values. The Company performed its annual impairment review for goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2022 and 2021, and concluded there was no impairment.

58

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Investments and Impairment. The Company reviews equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, the Company considers available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating potential impairment of these investments. If it is determined that an indicator of impairment exists, the Company assesses whether the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. If the carrying value of the investment exceeds its fair value, the Company will evaluate, among other factors, general market conditions, the duration and extent to which the carrying value is greater than the fair value, and KCS’s intent and ability to hold, or plans to sell, the investment. The Company also considers specific adverse conditions related to the financial health of and business outlook for the investee, including industry and sector performance, changes in technology, and operational and financing cash flow factors. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new carrying basis in the investment is established. No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Non-financial assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to recognition in the financial statements only in certain circumstances. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based upon the observability of inputs. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Environmental Liabilities. The Company recognizes liabilities for remediation and restoration costs when the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation and restoration are not discounted to their present value. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable. Costs of ongoing compliance activities related to current operations are expensed as incurred.
Personal Injury Claims. Personal injury claims in excess of self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage amounts, depending on the type of claim and year of occurrence. The Company’s personal injury liability is based on actuarial studies performed on an undiscounted basis by an independent third party actuarial firm and reviewed by management. The liability is based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Adjustments to the liability are reflected as operating expenses in the period in which the adjustments are known. Legal fees related to personal injury claims are recognized in operating expense in the period incurred.
Health and Welfare and Postemployment Benefits. The Company provides certain medical, life and other postemployment benefits to certain active employees and retirees. The Company uses actuaries to assist management areas.in measuring the benefit obligation and cost based on the current plan provisions, employee demographics, and assumptions about financial and demographic factors affecting the probability, timing and amount of expected future benefit payments. Significant assumptions include the discount rate, rate of increase in compensation levels, and the health care cost trend rate. Actuarial gains and losses determined at the measurement date (December 31) are recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of income.

59

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Share-Based Compensation. The Company accounted for all share-based compensation in accordance with fair value recognition provisions. Under this method, compensation expense was measured at grant date fair value and recognized over the requisite service period in which the award was earned. Forfeitures were recognized as they occurred. The Company had historically issued treasury stock to settle share-based awards.
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax effects of transactions reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax return purposes are recognized under the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences of the deferred income tax items and immediately recognizes changes in income tax laws in the year of enactment.
The Company has recognized a deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance, for net operating loss and capital loss carryovers. The Company projects sufficient future taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset recorded less the valuation allowance. These projections take into consideration assumptions about future income, future capital expenditures and inflation rates. If assumptions or actual conditions change, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance, will be adjusted to properly reflect the expected tax benefit.

Note 3. Merger Agreement
On September 15, 2021, KCS and CP entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) and on December 14, 2021, CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS. Each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of KCS that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive (1) 2.884 common shares of CP and (2) $90 in cash (together, the “Merger Consideration”), and each share of preferred stock, par value $25 per share, that was outstanding immediately prior to the merger was converted into the right to receive $37.50 in cash. The Merger Consideration value received by KCS stockholders was $301.20 per KCS common share.
The merger transaction was completed through a series of mergers as outlined in the Merger Agreement. These mergers ultimately resulted in KCS being merged with and into Cygnus Merger Sub 1 Corporation (“Surviving Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CP, with Surviving Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Surviving Merger Sub was renamed “Kansas City Southern” and as successor company of KCS, continued to own the assets of KCS. Immediately following the consummation of the mergers, CP caused the contribution, directly and indirectly, of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Surviving Merger Sub, as successor to KCS, to be deposited into an independent, irrevocable voting trust (the “Voting Trust”) under a voting trust agreement (the “Voting Trust Agreement”) approved by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), pending receipt of the final and non-appealable approval or exemption by the STB pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11323 et seq., of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (“STB Final Approval”). The Voting Trust prevents CP, or any affiliate of CP, from controlling or having the power to control KCS prior to STB Final Approval. Following receipt of STB Final Approval, the Voting Trust will be terminated and CP will acquire control over KCS’s railroad operations. STB Final Approval is expected to be granted in the first quarter of 2023, subject to the regulatory review process.
On December 14, 2021, the merger of KCS and Surviving Merger Sub was accounted for as a recapitalization of KCS’s equity. Upon STB Final Approval, the transaction will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. See more details regarding the recapitalization in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 14, Stockholder(s)’ Equity.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, periodic cash distributions may be made to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP based upon cash generated, the timing of capital expenditures and working capital needs of the Company. During 2022, KCS paid cash dividends of $880.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, KCS reported $46.6 million of merger-related costs. These merger costs primarily related to incentive compensation costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, KCS reported $264.0 million of merger-related costs. These merger costs primarily related to bankers’ fees, compensation and benefits costs, and legal fees. These costs were recognized in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income.

7

60

Table of Contents


Compensation & Organization Committee
Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Note 4. Restructuring Charges
As revenues declined in the second quarter of 2020 due to the novel coronavirus and its variants (“COVID-19”), the Company implemented a variety of cost-saving measures and accelerated Precision Scheduled Railroading (“PSR”) initiatives. In June of 2020, the Company offered a voluntary separation program, which resulted in a restructuring charge of $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, consisting of severance and benefit costs.
During 2020, the Company recognized approximately $7.3 million in additional restructuring charges related to PSR and the purchase and disposal of equipment.

Note 5. Leases
LeasesClassificationDecember 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Assets(in millions)
OperatingOperating lease right-of-use assets$100.9 $69.6 
FinanceProperty and equipment (including Concession assets), net17.8 13.9 
Total leased assets$118.7 $83.5 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingAccounts payable and accrued liabilities$28.8 $22.3 
FinanceLong-term debt due within one year6.3 4.5 
Noncurrent
OperatingLong-term operating lease liabilities71.5 46.4 
FinanceLong-term debt12.4 10.9 
Total lease liabilities$119.0 $84.1 

Committee Members
61
: Henry Maier (Chair); Lydia Beebe; David

Garza-Santos
Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Years ended
Lease CostClassificationDecember 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Operating lease cost:(in millions)
Equipment costs$20.8 $19.6 $23.3 
Materials and other5.7 5.8 5.0 
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of finance lease assetsDepreciation and amortization2.8 1.7 1.6 
Interest on lease liabilitiesInterest expense0.6 0.6 0.9 
Total lease cost$29.9 $27.7 $30.8 
Years ended
Cash Flow InformationDecember 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(in millions)
Cash paid for operating leases included in operating activities$32.5 $29.4 $45.6 
Cash paid for finance leases included in operating activities0.7 0.8 0.9 
Cash paid for finance leases included in financing activities5.9 3.5 2.0 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities58.9 32.9 18.4 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for financing lease liabilities9.2 11.5 0.8 
Lease Term and Discount RateDecember 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases4.24.2
Finance leases3.63.8
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases2.9 %2.2 %
Finance leases3.5 %5.1 %

Remaining Maturities of Lease Liabilities
Year Ending December 31 (in millions),
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2023$29.7 $6.8 
202425.6 4.5 
202518.9 4.2 
202617.0 3.6 
20279.5 0.4 
Thereafter3.5 — 
Total lease payments104.2 19.5 
Less imputed interest3.9 0.8 
Total$100.3 $18.7 


Primary responsibilities
:
Establishes, communicates to management and the Board and periodically updating the Company’s compensation philosophy, objectives, policies, strategies and programs, with the objective of ensuring they provide appropriate motivation for corporate performance and increased stockholder value.62

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Note 6. Revenue
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table presents revenues disaggregated by the major commodity groups as well as the product types included within the major commodity groups (in millions). The Company believes disaggregation by product type best depicts how cash flows are affected by economic factors. See Note 18, Geographic Information in the consolidated financial statements for revenues by geographical area.
Years ended December 31,
202220212020
Chemical & Petroleum
Chemicals$291.9 $263.5 $236.7 
Petroleum324.8 442.1 375.0 
Plastics166.8 146.2 152.1 
Total783.5 851.8 763.8 
Industrial & Consumer Products
Forest Products295.8 261.8 247.8 
Metals & Scrap257.3 204.9 188.4 
Other157.5 122.9 101.5 
Total710.6 589.6 537.7 
Agriculture & Minerals
Grain432.5 358.6 299.6 
Food Products175.1 152.3 154.6 
Ores & Minerals33.5 25.9 21.8 
Stone, Clay & Glass40.9 34.9 29.4 
Total682.0 571.7 505.4 
Energy
Utility Coal165.3 148.5 105.6 
Coal & Petroleum Coke49.2 47.3 41.8 
Frac Sand18.3 15.6 11.3 
Crude Oil72.4 43.4 36.3 
Total305.2 254.8 195.0 
Intermodal449.7 346.3 319.1 
Automotive258.4 183.2 172.7 
Total Freight Revenues3,189.4 2,797.4 2,493.7 
Other Revenue181.0 149.9 138.9 
Total Revenues$3,370.4 $2,947.3 $2,632.6 

Major customers
No individual customer makes up greater than 10% of total consolidated revenues.
Contract Balances
The amount of revenue recognized in 2022 from performance obligations partially satisfied in the previous year was $17.9 million. The performance obligations that were unsatisfied or partially satisfied as of December 31, 2022, were $25.8 million, which represents in-transit shipments that are fully satisfied the following month.
A receivable is any unconditional right to consideration, and is recognized as shipments have been completed and the relating performance obligation has been fully satisfied. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the accounts receivable, net balance
Reviews
63

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and approves corporate goalsSubsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
was $543.6 million and objectives relevant$271.0 million, respectively. Contract assets represent a conditional right to consideration in exchange for goods or services. The Company did not have any contract assets at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Contract liabilities represent consideration received in advance from customers, and are recognized as revenue over time as the compensationrelating performance obligation is satisfied. The amount of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), evaluatingrevenue recognized in 2022 that was included in the opening contract liability balance was $34.1 million. The Company has recognized contract liabilities within the accounts payable and reviewingaccrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities financial statement captions on the balance sheet.
The following tables summarize the changes in contract liabilities (in millions):
Contract liabilitiesYears ended December 31,
20222021
Beginning balance$68.4 $29.9 
Revenue recognized that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period(34.1)(29.7)
Increases due to consideration received, excluding amounts recognized as revenue during the period29.8 68.2 
Ending balance$64.1 $68.4 


Note 7. Property and Equipment (including Concession Assets)
The following tables list the major categories of property and equipment, including Concession assets, as well as the weighted-average composite depreciation rate for each category (in millions):
As of December 31, 2022CostAccumulated
Depreciation
Net Book
Value
Depreciation
Rates for 2022
Land$244.7 $— $244.7 N/A
Concession land rights141.1 (33.6)107.5 1.0 %
Rail and other track material2,394.8 (454.3)1,940.5 1.9-3.6%
Ties1,868.0 (475.8)1,392.2 1.4-5.4%
Grading1,013.1 (210.8)802.3 1.0 %
Bridges and tunnels940.8 (192.3)748.5 1.3 %
Ballast940.2 (277.8)662.4 2.2-4.4%
Other (a)1,652.5 (567.7)1,084.8 3.0 %
Total road property8,809.4 (2,178.7)6,630.7 2.7 %
Locomotives1,826.2 (637.0)1,189.2 5.0 %
Freight cars995.0 (266.4)728.6 2.9 %
Other equipment83.0 (41.1)41.9 5.2 %
Total equipment2,904.2 (944.5)1,959.7 4.3 %
Technology and other453.7 (335.6)118.1 10.9 %
Construction in progress301.7 — 301.7 N/A
Total property and equipment (including Concession assets)$12,854.8 $(3,492.4)$9,362.4 N/A
_____________
(a)Other includes signals, buildings and other road assets.

64

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
As of December 31, 2021CostAccumulated
Depreciation
Net Book
Value
Depreciation
Rates for 2021
Land$243.0 $— $243.0 N/A
Concession land rights141.1 (32.2)108.9 1.0 %
Rail and other track material2,240.6 (417.7)1,822.9 1.8-3.6%
Ties1,790.0 (435.6)1,354.4 1.4-5.4%
Grading1,006.8 (200.3)806.5 1.0 %
Bridges and tunnels884.1 (181.0)703.1 1.3 %
Ballast898.6 (258.2)640.4 2.2-4.4%
Other (a)1,610.5 (519.6)1,090.9 2.7 %
Total road property8,430.6 (2,012.4)6,418.2 2.6 %
Locomotives1,777.2 (546.6)1,230.6 4.5 %
Freight cars974.2 (234.4)739.8 2.2 %
Other equipment91.0 (39.9)51.1 5.0 %
Total equipment2,842.4 (820.9)2,021.5 3.7 %
Technology and other372.6 (290.7)81.9 15.6 %
Construction in progress335.8 — 335.8 N/A
Total property and equipment (including
Concession assets)
$12,365.5 $(3,156.2)$9,209.3 N/A
_____________
(a)Other includes signals, buildings and other road assets.
Concession assets, net of accumulated amortization of $797.3 million and $744.8 million, totaled $2,472.0 million and $2,459.3 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment (including Concession assets) totaled $390.9 million, $365.8 million and $357.9 million, for 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
The Company has historically received assistance from governmental entities, typically in the form of cash, for purposes of making improvements to its rail network as part of public safety and/or economic revitalization initiatives. The governmental entity generally specifies how the monetary assistance is to be spent, and may include limited conditions requiring the Company to return the assistance. The Company accounts for this assistance received as reductions to property and equipment in the period in which the improvement is made, with our CEO his performancethe assistance being amortized as an offset to depreciation expense over the life of the improvement. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the total governmental assistance received, net of accumulated amortization, was $34.8 million and $37.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2022, governmental assistance amortization was $2.5 million.
In 2020, $13.6 million of expense was recognized related to costs previously capitalized for the development of internal-use software. The development of the software was cancelled prior to completion and had no further use. The expense was recognized in lightwrite-off of those goals and objectives and setting our CEO’s compensation level based on that evaluation.software development costs in the consolidated statements of income.



65

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Note 8. Other Balance Sheet Captions
Other Current Assets. Other current assets included the following items at December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Prepaid expenses$28.4 $25.8 
Refundable Mexican value added tax78.9 78.0 
Prepaid income taxes14.3 19.0 
Advances to affiliates8.8 9.0 
Other8.4 10.3 
Other current assets$138.8 $142.1 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities included the following items at December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Accounts payable$207.2 $169.7 
Accrued wages and vacation128.4 103.7 
Accrued merger costs55.8 37.3 
Income and other taxes41.9 37.0 
Foreign currency forward contracts41.0 1.8 
Contract liabilities31.3 30.0 
Short-term operating lease liability28.8 22.3 
Interest payable26.2 26.2 
Derailments, personal injury and other claim provisions25.1 27.5 
Accrued rents and leases13.3 7.7 
Other36.7 16.5 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$635.7 $479.7 


Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s assets and liabilities recognized at fair value have been categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy as described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company’s derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and consist of foreign currency forward contracts and treasury lock agreements, which are classified as Level 2 valuations. The Company determines the fair value of its derivative financial instrument positions based upon pricing models using inputs observed from actively quoted markets and also takes into consideration the contract terms as well as other inputs, including market currency exchange rates.
The Company’s short-term financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings. The carrying value of the short-term financial instruments approximates their fair value.
The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated using quoted market prices when available. When quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on current market interest rates for debt with similar maturities and credit quality. The carrying value of the Company’s debt was $3,779.6 million and $3,777.6 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. If the Company’s debt were measured at fair value, the fair value measurements of the individual debt instruments would have been classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Reviews
66

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and approvesSubsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The fair value of the compensationCompany’s financial instruments is presented in the following table (in millions):
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Level 2Level 2
Assets
Treasury lock agreements$— $57.4 
Liabilities
Debt instruments3,308.3 4,311.1 
Foreign currency derivative instruments41.0 1.8 

Note 10. Derivative Instruments
The Company enters into derivative transactions in certain situations based on management’s assessment of current market conditions and perceived risks. Management intends to respond to evolving business and market conditions and in doing so, may enter into such transactions as deemed appropriate.
Credit Risk. As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk. The Company manages this risk by limiting its counterparties to large financial institutions which meet the Company’s credit rating standards and have an established banking relationship with the Company. As of December 31, 2022, the Company did not expect any losses as a result of default of its counterparties.
Interest Rate Derivative Instruments. During 2020, the Company executed six 30-year treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional value of $650.0 million and a weighted-average interest rate of 1.58%. The purpose of the treasury locks was to hedge the U.S. Treasury benchmark interest rate associated with future interest payments related to the anticipated refinancing of the $444.7 million principal amount of 3.00% senior notes due May 15, 2023 (the “3.00% Senior Notes”) and the $200.0 million principal amount of 3.85% senior notes due November 15, 2023 (the “3.85% Senior Notes”). The Company designated the treasury locks as cash flow hedges and recorded unrealized gains and losses in accumulated other memberscomprehensive income (loss).
During the fourth quarter of 2022, KCS determined the forecasted refinancing of the 3.00% Senior Notes and the 3.85% Senior Notes was no longer considered probable to occur as financing costs have risen and the Company plans to extinguish the maturing debt with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. Accordingly, the Company removed the cash flow hedge designation to all tranches and derecognized the related unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The treasury lock instruments were settled and the Company recognized the gain on settlement of the interest rate derivative instruments of $259.3 million within the consolidated statements of income. The settlement of the treasury lock agreements was classified as an investing activity within the consolidated statements of cash flows.
In May 2017, the Company executed four treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional value of $275.0 million and a weighted-average interest rate of 2.85%. The purpose of the treasury locks was to hedge the U.S. Treasury benchmark interest rate associated with future interest payments related to the anticipated refinancing of the $275.0 million, 2.35% senior managementnotes due May 15, 2020 (the “2.35% Senior Notes”). The Company designated the treasury locks as cash flow hedges and recorded unrealized gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). During the fourth quarter of 2019, KCS issued $425.0 million principal amount of 2.875% senior notes due November 15, 2029 (the “2.875% Senior Notes”), effectively completing the refinancing of the 2.35% Senior Notes, and settled the treasury lock agreements, resulting in cash paid of $25.8 million. This amount was included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is beingamortized to interest expense over the life of the new 2.875% Senior Notes, increasing the effective interest rate on the notes to 3.60%.
Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments. The Company’s Mexican subsidiaries have net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets which, for Mexican income tax purposes, are subject to periodic revaluation based on changes in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. This revaluation creates fluctuations in the Company’s Mexican income tax expense and the amount of income taxes paid in Mexico. The Company hedges its exposure to this cash tax risk by entering into foreign

67

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
currency forward contracts, which involve the Company’s purchase of Mexican pesos and/or U.S. dollars at an agreed-upon weighted-average exchange rate to each U.S dollar or Mexican Peso.
Below is a summary of the Company’s 2022, 2021 and 2020 foreign currency derivative contracts (amounts in millions, except Ps./USD):
Foreign currency forward contracts
Contracts to sell Ps./receive USDOffsetting contracts to purchase Ps./pay USD
Notional amount
Notional amount
Weighted-average exchange rate
(in Ps./USD)
Notional amount
Notional amount
Weighted-average exchange rate
(in Ps./USD)
Cash received/(paid) on settlement
Contracts executed in 2022 and outstanding$535.0 Ps.11,235.2 Ps.21.0 — — — — 
Contracts executed in 2022 and settled in 2022$110.0 Ps.2,348.4 Ps.21.3 $113.4 Ps.2,348.4 Ps.20.7 $(3.4)
Contracts executed in 2021 and settled in 2022$270.0 Ps.5,583.3 Ps.20.7 $271.7 Ps.5,583.3 Ps.20.6 $(1.7)
Contracts executed in 2020 and settled in 2020$75.0 Ps.1,555.5 Ps.20.7 $78.0 Ps.1,555.5 Ps.20.0 $(2.9)
Contracts to purchase Ps./pay USDOffsetting contracts to sell Ps./receive USD
Notional amount
Notional amount
Weighted-average exchange rate
(in Ps./USD)
Notional amount
Notional amount
Weighted-average exchange rate
(in Ps./USD)
Cash received/(paid) on settlement
Contracts executed in 2021 and settled in 2021$100.0 Ps.1,993.5 Ps.19.9 $98.1 Ps.1,993.5 Ps.20.3 $(1.9)
Contracts executed in 2020 and settled in 2020$555.0 Ps.11,254.3 Ps.20.3 $534.3 Ps.11,254.3 Ps.21.1 $(20.7)
Contracts executed in 2019 and settled in 2020$105.0 Ps.2,041.2 Ps.19.4 $108.6 Ps.2,041.2 Ps.18.8 $3.6 
The Company has not designated any of the foreign currency derivative contracts as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The Company measures the foreign currency derivative contracts at fair value each period and recognizes any change in fair value in foreign exchange gain (loss) within the consolidated statements of income. The cash flows associated with these instruments is classified as an operating activity within the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Offsetting. The Company’s treasury lock agreements and foreign currency forward contracts are executed with counterparties in the U.S. and are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreements that include standard netting arrangements. Asset and liability positions from contracts with the same counterparty are net settled upon maturity/expiration and presented on a net basis in the consolidated balance sheets prior to settlement.

68

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31 (in millions):
Derivative Assets
Balance Sheet Location20222021
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Treasury lock agreementsOther assets— $57.4 
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments— 57.4 
Total derivative assets— $57.4 
Derivative Liabilities
Balance Sheet Location20222021
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contractsAccounts payable and accrued liabilities$41.0 $1.8 
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments41.0 1.8 
Total derivative liabilities$41.0 $1.8 
The following table summarizes the gross and net fair value of derivative liabilities (in millions):
As of December 31, 2022Gross LiabilitiesGross
Assets
Net Amounts Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Derivatives subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement$41.0 — $41.0 
As of December 31, 2021
Derivatives subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement$2.8 $(1.0)$1.8 

The following tables present the effects of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income and consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipsAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on DerivativeLocation of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into IncomeAmount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
202220212020202220212020
Treasury lock agreements$201.9 $21.8 $35.6 Interest expense$(2.4)$(2.5)$(2.4)
Gain on settlement of treasury lock agreements259.3 — — 
     Total$201.9 $21.8 $35.6 $256.9 $(2.5)$(2.4)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging InstrumentsLocation of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on DerivativeAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
202220212020
Foreign currency forward contractsForeign exchange loss$(44.3)$(3.7)$(22.5)
Total$(44.3)$(3.7)$(22.5)

69

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

See Note 9, Fair Value Measurements, for the determination of the fair values of derivatives.

Note 11. Short-Term Borrowings
Commercial Paper. The Company’s commercial paper program generally serves as the primary means of short-term funding. As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, KCS had no commercial paper outstanding. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, commercial paper borrowings were outstanding for less than 90 days and the related activity is presented on a net basis in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Note 12. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt at December 31 (in millions):
20222021
PrincipalUnamortized Discount and Debt Issuance CostsNetPrincipalUnamortized Discount and Debt Issuance CostsNet
Revolving credit facilities, variable interest rate, due 2024$— $— $— $— $— $— 
KCS 3.00% senior notes, due 2023439.1 0.3 438.8 439.1 1.0 438.1 
KCS 3.85% senior notes, due 2023199.2 0.2 199.0 199.2 0.5 198.7 
KCS 3.125% senior notes, due 2026250.0 1.3 248.7 250.0 1.7 248.3 
KCS 2.875% senior notes, due 2029425.0 3.0 422.0 425.0 3.4 421.6 
KCS 4.30% senior notes, due 2043448.7 7.8 440.9 448.7 8.1 440.6 
KCS 4.95% senior notes, due 2045499.2 6.4 492.8 499.2 6.7 492.5 
KCS 4.70% senior notes, due 2048500.0 5.4 494.6 500.0 5.6 494.4 
KCS 3.50% senior notes, due 2050550.0 10.1 539.9 550.0 10.4 539.6 
KCS 4.20% senior notes, due 2069425.0 6.7 418.3 425.0 6.8 418.2 
KCSR 3.85% to 4.95% senior notes, due through 20452.7 — 2.7 2.7 — 2.7 
KCSM 3.00% senior notes, due 20235.6 — 5.6 5.6 — 5.6 
RRIF loans 2.96% to 4.29%, due serially through 203757.7 0.3 57.4 62.0 0.3 61.7 
Finance lease obligations, due serially to 202718.7 — 18.7 15.4 — 15.4 
Other debt obligations0.2 — 0.2 0.2 — 0.2 
Total3,821.1 41.5 3,779.6 3,822.1 44.5 3,777.6 
Less: Debt due within one year655.5 0.5 655.0 8.8 — 8.8 
Long-term debt$3,165.6 $41.0 $3,124.6 $3,813.3 $44.5 $3,768.8 
Revolving Credit Facility
KCS, with certain of its domestic subsidiaries named therein as guarantors, has a $600.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), with a $25.0 million standby letter of credit facility which, if utilized, constitutes usage under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility serves as a backstop for KCS’s commercial paper program (the “Commercial Paper Program”) which generally serves as the Company’s primary means of short-term funding.

70

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at floating rates. Depending on the Company’s credit rating, the margin that KCS would pay above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) at any point is between 1.000% and 1.750%. As of December 31, 2022, the margin was 1.25% based on KCS’s current credit rating.
The Revolving Credit Facility is guaranteed by KCSR, together with certain domestic subsidiaries named therein as guarantors and matures on March 8, 2024. The Revolving Credit Facility agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants and events of default that are customary for credit agreements of this type. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the termination of the commitments and the acceleration of the repayment of any outstanding principal balance on the Revolving Credit Facility and the Commercial Paper Program.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, KCS had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
SeniorNotes
The Company’s senior notes include certain covenants that are customary for these types of debt instruments issued by borrowers with similar credit ratings.
The KCS notes are KCS’s general unsecured senior obligations and are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior basis by each current and future domestic subsidiary of KCS that from time to time guarantees the Revolving Credit Facility or any other debt of KCS or any of KCS’s significant subsidiaries that is a guarantor (collectively, the “Note Guarantors”).
KCSR’s senior notes are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior basis, by KCS and each current and future domestic subsidiary of KCS that guarantees the Revolving Credit Facility or certain other debt of KCS or a note guarantor. KCSR’s senior notes and the note guarantees rank pari passu in right of payment with KCSR’s, KCS’s and the Note Guarantors’ existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated obligations.
KCSM’s senior notes are denominated in U.S. dollars; are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations; rank pari passu in right of payment with KCSM’s existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated obligations and are senior in right of payment to KCSM’s future subordinated indebtedness.
Senior notes are redeemable at the issuer’s option, in whole or in part, at any time, by paying the greater of either 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed and a formula price based on recommendationsinterest rates prevailing at the time of redemption and time remaining to maturity, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to, but excluding the redemption date. In addition, KCSM’s senior notes are redeemable, in whole but not in part, at KCSM’s option at any time at a redemption price of 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in the Mexican withholding tax rate.
RRIF Loan Agreements
The following loans were made under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (“RRIF”) Program administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”):
KCSR RRIF Loan Agreement. On February 21, 2012, KCSR entered into an agreement with the FRA to borrow $54.6 million to be used to reimburse KCSR for a portion of the purchase price of thirty new locomotives (the “Locomotives”) acquired by KCSR in the fourth quarter of 2011. The loan bears interest at 2.96% annually and the principal balance amortizes quarterly with a final maturity of February 24, 2037. The obligations under the financing agreement are secured by a first priority security interest in the Locomotives and certain related rights. In addition, the Company has agreed to guarantee repayment of the amounts due under the financing agreement and certain related agreements. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of the repayment of any outstanding principal balance of the loan.
Tex-Mex RRIF Loan Agreement. On June 28, 2005, Tex-Mex entered into an agreement with the FRA to borrow $50.0 million to be used for infrastructure improvements in order to accommodate growing freight rail traffic related to the NAFTA corridor. The loan bears interest at 4.29% annually and the principal balance amortizes quarterly with a final maturity of July 13, 2030. The loan is guaranteed by Mexrail, which has issued a pledge agreement in favor of the lender equal to the gross revenues earned by Mexrail on per-car fees on traffic crossing the International Rail Bridge in Laredo, Texas. In addition, the Company has agreed to guarantee the scheduled principal payment installments due to the FRA from Tex-Mex under the loan agreement on a rolling five-year basis.

71

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Debt Covenants Compliance
The Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of December 31, 2022.
Other Debt Provisions
Certain loan agreements and debt instruments entered into or guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries provide for default in the event of a specified change in control of the Company or particular subsidiaries of the Company.
Debt Maturities
Minimum annual payments for debt maturities are as follows (in millions):
YearsLong-Term DebtNet Present Value Finance LeasesTotal
2023$649.2 $6.3 $655.5 
20244.6 4.3 8.9 
20255.0 4.1 9.1 
2026255.0 3.6 258.6 
20275.2 0.4 5.6 
Thereafter2,883.4 — 2,883.4 
Total$3,802.4 $18.7 $3,821.1 

Note 13. Income Taxes
Current income tax expense represents the amounts expected to be reported on the Company’s income tax returns, and deferred tax expense or benefit represents the change in net deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded as appropriate to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount considered likely to be realized.
Tax Expense. Income tax expense consists of the following components (in millions):
202220212020
Current:
Federal$88.4 $18.1 $(1.9)
State and local8.2 2.7 1.6 
Foreign194.3 167.1 155.0 
Total current290.9 187.9 154.7 
Deferred:
Federal52.7 21.2 49.4 
State and local(3.3)(1.6)13.8 
Foreign(14.4)3.6 (13.8)
Total deferred35.0 23.2 49.4 
Total income tax expense$325.9 $211.1 $204.1 

72

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Income before income taxes consists of the following (in millions):
202220212020
Income before income taxes:
U.S.$662.1 $148.6 $329.0 
Foreign647.6 589.5 494.2 
Total income before income taxes$1,309.7 $738.1 $823.2 
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31 follow (in millions):
20222021
Assets:
Reserves not currently deductible for tax$65.5 $42.5 
Compensation and benefits32.0 28.0 
Lease liability26.9 19.4 
Tax credit and loss carryovers14.8 26.4 
Other26.5 6.5 
Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance165.7 122.8 
Valuation allowance(2.1)(7.3)
Net deferred tax assets163.6 115.5 
Liabilities:
Property(1,317.1)(1,253.0)
Investments(57.9)(56.0)
Other(25.7)(20.2)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(1,400.7)(1,329.2)
Net deferred tax liability$(1,237.1)$(1,213.7)

73

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Tax Rates. Differences between the Company’s effective income tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 21% follow (in millions):
202220212020
DollarsPercentDollarsPercentDollarsPercent
Income tax expense using the statutory rate in effect$275.0 21.0 %$155.0 21.0 %$172.9 21.0 %
Tax effect of:
Difference between U.S. and foreign tax rate57.4 4.4 %51.9 7.0 %44.1 5.4 %
Inflation(25.8)(2.0 %)(10.4)(1.4 %)(4.9)(0.6 %)
Tax credits(11.9)(0.9 %)(11.7)(1.6 %)(13.8)(1.7 %)
Foreign exchange (i)9.4 0.7 %5.9 0.8 %(3.4)(0.4 %)
State and local income tax provision, net9.1 0.7 %0.2 — 12.5 1.5 %
Withholding tax8.5 0.6 %8.5 1.2 %9.9 1.2 %
Non-deductible executive compensation3.6 0.3 %14.7 2.0 %1.8 0.2 %
Non-deductible transaction costs0.6 — 14.0 1.9 %— — 
Global intangible low-taxed income tax, net0.1 — 0.4 0.1 %(14.5)(1.8 %)
Share-based compensation— — (25.2)(3.4 %)(4.6)(0.6 %)
Other, net(0.1)0.1 %7.8 1.0 %4.1 0.6 %
Income tax expense$325.9 24.9 %$211.1 28.6 %$204.1 24.8 %
_____________________
(i)The Company’s Mexican subsidiaries have net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets which, for Mexican income tax purposes, are subject to periodic revaluation based on changes in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. This revaluation creates fluctuations in the Company’s Mexican income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income and the amount of income taxes paid in Mexico. The Company also has net monetary assets denominated in Mexican pesos, that are subject to periodic re-measurement and settlement that creates fluctuations in foreign currency gains and losses in the consolidated statements of income. The Company hedges its net exposure to variations in earnings by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts involve the Company’s agreement to buy or sell pesos at an agreed-upon exchange rate on a future date. Refer to Note 10, Derivative Instruments for further information.
Difference Attributable to Foreign Investments. The Company asserts that all foreign earnings will be indefinitely reinvested to the extent of local needs and earnings that would be distributed in a taxable manner. The Company therefore intends to limit distributions to earnings previously taxed in the U.S., or earnings that would qualify for the 100 percent dividends received deduction and earnings that would not result in any significant foreign taxes. Therefore, the Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability on its investment in foreign subsidiaries.
Tax Carryovers. The Company has U.S. state net operating losses which are carried forward from 10 years to indefinitely and are analyzed each year to determine the likelihood of realization. The state loss carryovers arise from both combined and separate tax filings from as early as 2001 and may expire as early as December 31, 2023. The state loss carryover at December 31, 2022 was $64.9 million resulting in a state deferred tax asset of $7.2 million.
The Mexico federal loss carryovers at December 31, 2022, were $27.0 million resulting in a net deferred tax asset of $7.9 million, and, if not used, will begin to expire in 2026. A deferred tax asset was recognized in prior periods for the expected future tax benefit of these losses which will be carried forward to reduce only Mexican income tax payable in future years.

74

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $2.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively, primarily attributable to state net operating loss and capital loss carryovers. The Company believes it is more likely than not that reversals of existing temporary differences that will produce future taxable income and the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, related to loss carryovers.
Uncertain Tax Positions. The accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance requires the Company to recognize in the consolidated financial statements the benefit of a tax position only if the impact is more likely than not of being sustained on audit based on the technical merits of the position. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
20222021
Balance at January 1,$2.2 $2.2 
Additions for tax positions of prior years1.3 — 
Reductions for settlement with taxing authorities(2.2)— 
Balance at December 31,$1.3 $2.2 
The unrecognized tax benefit would affect the effective income tax rate if recognized, and is not expected to change in the next twelve months.
Interest, inflation and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included in income before taxes on the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest, inflation and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits was $2.6 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Interest, inflation and penalty expense was $2.6 million and less than $0.1 million for 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Tax Contingencies. Tax returns filed in the U.S. for periods after 2017 and in Mexico for periods after 2014 remain open to examination by the taxing authority. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its examination of the 2017 deemed mandatory repatriation tax included in the 2017 U.S. federal tax return and the 2016 U.S. federal tax return with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements. The Servicio de Administración Tributaria (“SAT”), the Mexican equivalent of the IRS, has initiated examinations of the KCSM 2015 through 2020 Mexico tax returns and the Financiera Inspira, S.A. de C.V. SOFOM, E.N.R. 2016 and 2017 Mexico tax returns. The Company does not expect that these examinations will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. During 2017, the Company received audit assessments from the CEOSAT for the KCSM 2009 and 2010 Mexico tax returns. The Company commenced administrative actions with the SAT and the audit assessments were subsequently nullified. In the third quarter of 2018, the SAT issued new assessments and the Company filed administrative appeals with the SAT. During the first quarter of 2022, the Company received an independent compensation consultant.audit assessment from the SAT for the KCSM 2013 Mexico tax return and filed an administrative appeal of the assessment in the second quarter of 2022.
On April 13, 2022, the SAT used an electronic tax mailbox to deliver an audit assessment on the 2014 KCSM tax returns, which as of December 31, 2022 was Ps.5.7 billion (approximately $296.0 million USD) of tax, interest, penalties and inflation (the “2014 Audit Assessment”). In 2014, KCSM filed an amparo lawsuit with the district court, objecting to the SAT’s electronic accounting requirements, including the SAT’s use of the electronic tax mailbox, and KCSM was granted a permanent injunction in 2015 preventing the SAT from delivering any notification of assessments using the electronic tax mailbox. The permanent injunction remained in effect through the date the SAT issued the 2014 Audit Assessment. The Company became aware of the 2014 Audit Assessment on June 30, 2022 and based on the permanent injunction on the electronic accounting requirements, the Company believed it had thirty business days from that date to file an appeal. On July 7, 2022, the Company filed an administrative appeal of the 2014 Audit Assessment with the SAT. During the third quarter of 2022, the SAT dismissed the administrative appeal of the 2014 Audit Assessment on the basis it wasn’t filed timely. During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company filed a nullification lawsuit in Mexican court challenging the SAT dismissal of the administrative appeal of the

75

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
2014 Audit Assessment. The Company believes that it has strong legal arguments in its favor and it is more likely than not that the administrative appeal of the 2014 Audit Assessment was timely filed.

The 2014 Audit Assessment includes tax positions where KCSM has prior favorable court decisions or strong legal arguments in its favor. Management believes it is more likely than not it will prevail in any challenge of the 2014 Audit Assessment. Historically, the Company has not been required to pay to settle previous SAT audit assessments or has settled SAT audit assessments for an immaterial amount.
On July 1, 2022, the SAT froze KCSM’s Mexico bank accounts without any request for payment of the 2014 Audit Assessment or notification of the freeze. The Company filed an amparo lawsuit challenging the legality of the bank account freeze. The district court issued a permanent injunction requiring the SAT to remove the freeze subject to KCSM posting a performance bond or other collateral upon the SAT demonstrating a tax obligation exists. In August 2022, KCSM posted a performance bond in the amount of Ps.5.6 billion (approximately $291.0 million USD) and the bank account freeze was removed. On January 5, 2023, the administrative court granted KCSM a permanent injunction to prevent any collection by the SAT. The freeze and cost of obtaining the performance bond did not have a significant impact on KCSM’s cash flows or operations. The provision of the performance bond is not an agreement or concession with regard to the 2014 Audit Assessment and in no way impacts KCSM’s ability to further defend its tax position.
The Company believes that it has strong legal arguments in its favor and it is more likely than not that it will prevail in any challenge of the assessments.
Refundable Mexican Value Added Tax. KCSM is not required to charge its customers value added tax (“VAT”) on international import or export transportation services, which prior to 2022 resulted in KCSM paying more VAT on its expenses than it collected from customers. These excess VAT payments are refundable by the Mexican government. Prior to 2019, Mexican companies could offset their monthly refundable VAT balance with other tax obligations. In January 2019, Mexico tax reform eliminated the ability to offset other tax obligations with refundable VAT. From 2019 through 2021, KCSM has generated a refundable VAT balance and filed refund claims with the SAT, which have not been refunded.
In November 2021, changes to the VAT law were announced and became effective beginning January 1, 2022. These changes reduced the recoverability of VAT paid by KCSM on its expenditures that support international import transportation service revenues that are not subject to a VAT charge. VAT that is unrecoverable from the Mexican government results in incremental VAT expense for KCSM. Beginning in 2022, KCSM changed certain service offering to either require VAT to be charged to customers on revenue, or impose a rate increase to offset the incremental VAT expense. These measures implemented by KCSM increased the VAT to be collected from customers and payable to the Mexican government.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the KCSM refundable VAT balance was $78.9 million and $152.2 million, respectively. KCSM has prior favorable Mexican court decisions and a legal opinion supporting its right under Mexican law to recover the refundable VAT balance from the Mexican government and believes the VAT to be fully recoverable. KCSM will recover the refundable VAT balance as a VAT billed to customers exceeds creditable VAT charged by vendors. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, $78.9 million and $78.0 million, respectively, of the refundable VAT balance was classified as a short-term asset.


76

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Note 14. Stockholder(s)’ Equity
Capital Stock. The Company had 100 shares of $0.01 par, common stock authorized, issued, and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Merger Agreement. As disclosed in Note 3, Merger Agreement, the merger transaction was completed through a series of mergers as outlined in the Merger Agreement. These mergers ultimately resulted in KCS being merged with and into Surviving Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of CP, with Surviving Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity. On December 14, 2021, the merger of KCS and Surviving Merger Sub was accounted for as a recapitalization of KCS’s equity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, KCS’s issued and outstanding common stock and preferred stock was replaced by the common stock of Surviving Merger Sub, which consisted of 100 issued and outstanding shares at $0.01 par value with the remaining difference being reclassified to additional paid-in capital. Upon final control approval from the STB, the transaction will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting.
Treasury Stock. Shares of common stock in treasury and related activity prior to the merger follow:
20212020
Balance at beginning of year32,305,078 27,236,516 
Shares repurchased233,402 5,350,976 
Shares issued to fund stock option exercises(189,775)(133,951)
Employee stock purchase plan shares issued(41,338)(51,658)
Nonvested shares issued(50,127)(111,003)
Nonvested shares forfeited16,808 14,198 
Conversion of restricted shares to cash25,049 — 
Recapitalization of equity(32,299,097)— 
Balance at end of year— 32,305,078 
Cash Dividends to Canadian Pacific. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, during 2022 KCS paid cash dividends of $880.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
Cash Dividends on Common Stock. The following table presents the amount of cash dividends declared per common share by the Company’s Board of Directors on the Company’s historical common stock prior to the merger:
20212020
Cash dividends declared per common share$1.62 $1.64 

Note 15. Share-Based Compensation
In March 2021, pursuant to the merger agreement in effect at that time, the number of shares available to grant from the 2017 equity incentive plan (“2017 Plan”) was limited to a pool of 64,051 shares to be granted in the form of restricted share awards with a vesting period of not less than 1 year. The pool expired in August 2021 and no further awards were granted. In December 2021, upon the effective date of the merger, the 2017 Plan was terminated.
On December 14, 2021, upon CP’s acquisition of the Company’s common stock per the Merger Agreement, the vesting of certain unvested share-based compensation arrangements of the Company was accelerated. These awards included unvested restricted shares awarded prior to the initial merger announcement on March 21, 2021, and unvested options, which were cash settled at the Merger Consideration value less the option’s exercise price. Unvested restricted shares awarded after the initial announcement of the merger on March 21, 2021, were replaced with a fixed, cash-based award that entitled the holder thereof, upon vesting at the end of the requisite service period, to receive an amount in cash equal to the Merger Consideration. Unvested performance share awards were replaced with a fixed, cash-based award that entitles the holder thereof, upon vesting
Retains
77

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and reviews independence of an independent compensation consultantSubsidiaries
Notes to provide advice on executive and director compensation programs, market pay analyses, peer groups and reviewConsolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
at the end of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.award’s original, three-year requisite service period, to receive an amount in cash equal to the Merger Consideration value of $301.20 for each performance share award held multiplied by the maximum performance factor of 200% of the original target award. In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLCCompany recognized $55.9 million of compensation expense from the accelerated vesting, increase in fair value and replacement of awards into a fixed, cash-based award in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income. As the equity incentive plan was terminated in 2021, no further equity or liability classified awards occurred. Therefore, the following disclosures are for prior year awards only.
Stock Options. The exercise price for options granted under the equity incentive plans equaled the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Options generally had a 3-year vesting period and were exercisable over the 10-year contractual term. The grant date fair value was recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:
20212020
Expected dividend yield0.83 %1.04 %
Expected volatility30.86 %26.07 %
Risk-free interest rate0.74 %1.27 %
Expected term (years)
6.05.7
Weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted$58.74 $37.79 
The expected dividend yield was calculated as the ratio of dividends paid per share of common stock to the stock price on the date of grant. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a term equal to the estimated life of the options. The risk-free interest rate was determined based on U.S. Treasury rates for instruments with terms approximating the expected term of the options granted, which represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding and based on the historical experience of similar awards.
Excluding the cost recognized in connection with the merger, compensation cost of $3.9 million and $4.0 million was recognized for stock option awards for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income was $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Upon CP’s acquisition of the Company’s common stock per the Merger Agreement, the unvested stock options were fully vested, and the Company recognized an additional $12.3 million in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income for the acceleration of vesting and the increase in fair value of the awards to the Merger Consideration of $301.20 less the applicable option’s exercise price. The outstanding and unexercised options at the acquisition date were then cash settled by the Company for approximately $75.2 million prior to December 31, 2021, with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital. The income tax benefit recognized within the consolidated statements of income from cash settling the stock options was $15.6 million.
Additional information regarding stock option exercises appears in the table below (in millions):
20212020
Aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options vested$8.5 $3.7 
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised34.9 13.9 
Cash received from option exercises19.9 9.9 
Tax benefit from options exercised during the annual period7.8 3.5 
Nonvested Stock. The plan provided for the granting of nonvested stock awards to officers and other designated employees. The grant date fair value was based on the closing market price on the date of the grant. These awards are subject to

78

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
forfeiture if employment terminates during the vesting period, which is generally 1 year or 5 years of vesting for employees. Awards granted to the Company’s directors vested immediately on date of grant. The grant date fair value of nonvested shares was recognized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The fair value (at vest date) of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $59.2 million and $15.3 million, respectively.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested stock granted during 2021 and 2020 was $248.88 and $147.82, respectively. Excluding the cost recognized in connection with the Merger Agreement, compensation cost for nonvested stock was $9.8 million and $10.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized within the consolidated statements of income was $2.4 million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For the nonvested stock granted prior to March 21, 2021, the awards were fully vested on December 3, 2021, at a price of $290.71 per share. The grantee received KCS common shares, net of shares withheld for taxes, based on the $290.71 price per share for each nonvested share held at that date. The acceleration of vesting resulted in $9.6 million of additional expense recognized in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income. The income tax benefit recognized from the acceleration of vesting was $2.4 million. Upon CP’s acquisition of the Company’s common stock per the Merger Agreement, the grantee received the per share Merger Consideration value for each KCS common share held. For the nonvested stock granted after March 21, 2021, each nonvested share was replaced with a cash-based award that entitles the holder to receive a fixed amount in cash equal to the Merger Consideration value of $301.20 upon rendering of the requisite service. The remaining unamortized expense will be recognized to merger costs on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period, which is through 2026 and is subject to the terms of the original award agreement as modified by the Merger Agreement.
Performance Based Awards. The Company granted performance based nonvested stock awards during 2021 (the “2021 Awards”) and 2020 (the “2020 Awards”). The awards granted provided a target number of shares that vest at the end of a 3-year requisite service period following the grant date. In addition to the service condition, the number of nonvested shares to be received depended on the attainment of defined Company-wide performance goals based on operating ratio (“Meridian”OR”) and return on invested capital (“ROIC”) over a 3-year performance period. The awards were also subject to a revenue growth multiplier based on a 3-year performance period calculated as defined in the related award agreement that can range from 80% to 120% of the award earned based on the OR and ROIC achieved. The number of nonvested shares ultimately earned would range between zero to 200% of the target award.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance based nonvested stock granted during 2021 and 2020 was $211.10 and $157.75, respectively. The Company expensed the grant date fair value of the awards which were probable of being earned over the performance periods. Excluding the cost recognized in connection with the Merger Agreement, compensation cost on performance based awards was $10.1 million and $8.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total income tax benefit recognized within the consolidated statements of income for performance based awards was $2.5 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31,2021 and 2020, respectively.
The fair value (at vest date) of shares vested for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $11.7 million, and $7.8 million, respectively.
Upon CP’s acquisition of the Company’s common stock per the Merger Agreement, the unvested performance share awards were replaced with a fixed, cash-based award that entitles the holder thereof, upon vesting at the end of the award’s original, three-year requisite service period, to receive an amount in cash equal to the Merger Consideration value of $301.20 for each performance share award held multiplied by the maximum performance factor of 200% of the original target award. The increase in the fair value of the award and the number of awards to be issued resulted in additional expense of $34.0 million recognized in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income for the requisite service that had been provided as of December 31, 2021. The income tax benefit recognized for the additional expense was $10.7 million. The remaining unamortized expense will be recognized to merger costs over the remaining vesting period, which is through 2024 and is subject to the terms of the original award agreement as modified by the Merger Agreement.

79

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) provided substantially all U.S. full-time employees of the Company, certain subsidiaries and certain other affiliated entities, with the right to subscribe to an aggregate of 4.0 million shares of common stock of the Company. Under the ESPP, eligible employees could contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 10% of their regular base compensation during six-month purchase periods at a purchase price equal to 85% of the closing market price on either the exercise date or the “Compensation Consultant”) asoffering date, whichever was lower. The Company terminated its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee reviewedESPP program upon entering into its initial merger agreement with CP in March 2021, thus only the nature of its relationship with MeridianJanuary period was offered during 2021 and determined there were no conflictsremaining shares available for future ESPP offerings.
At the end of interest with respecteach purchase period, the accumulated deductions were applied toward the purchase of the Company’s common stock. Both the discount in grant price and the share option purchase price were valued to derive the award’s fair value. The awards vest and the expense was recognized ratably over the offering period.
The following table summarizes activity related to the various ESPP offerings:
Exercise DateReceived
from
Employees(i)
In millions
Date
Issued
Purchase
Price
Shares
Issued
   
January 2021 offeringJuly 1, 2021$170.83 18,046 $3.1 
July 2020 offeringJanuary 5, 2021$122.91 23,292 $2.9 
January 2020 offeringJuly 2, 2020$126.90 23,709 $3.0 
_____________________
(i)Represents amounts received from employees through payroll deductions for share purchases under applicable offering.
The fair value of the ESPP stock purchase rights was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used for each of the respective periods were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
20212020
Expected dividend yield0.88 %1.07 %
Expected volatility18.65 %30.55 %
Risk-free interest rate0.05 %1.01 %
Expected term (years)
0.50.5
Weighted-average grant date fair value$40.40 $35.14 
Compensation expense of $0.7 million and $1.7 million was recognized for ESPP option awards for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Concession Duty. Under KCSM’s 50-year Concession, which could expire in 2047 unless extended, KCSM pays annual concession duty expense of 1.25% of gross revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the concession duty expense, which is recorded within materials and other in operating expenses, was $21.2 million, compared to $18.7 million and $17.4 million for the same periods in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Litigation. Occasionally, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings, regulatory examinations, investigations, administrative actions, and other legal matters, arising for the most part in the ordinary course of business, incidental to its independence. See “Compensation Discussionoperations. Included in these proceedings are various tort claims brought by current and Analysis”former employees for additional information on Meridian.
job-related injuries and by third parties for injuries related to railroad operations. KCS aggressively defends these matters and has established liability provisions that management believes are adequate to cover expected costs. The outcome of litigation and
Annually
80

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
other legal matters is always uncertain. KCS believes it has valid defenses to the legal matters currently pending against it, is defending itself vigorously, and has recorded accruals determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, where appropriate. In making a determination regarding accruals, using available information, KCS evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party to and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of KCS’s defenses and consultation with legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the current estimates. It is possible that resolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to KCS’s consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
Environmental Liabilities. The Company’s U.S. operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The major U.S. environmental laws to which the Company is subject include, among others, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA,” also known as the Superfund law), the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act. CERCLA can impose joint and several liabilities for cleanup and investigation costs, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, as well as those who generate, or arrange for the disposal of, hazardous substances. The Company does not believe that compliance with the requirements imposed by the environmental legislation will impair its competitive capability or result in any material additional capital expenditures, operating or maintenance costs. The Company is, however, subject to environmental remediation costs as described in the following paragraphs.
The Company’s Mexico operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment through the establishment of standards for water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. The Mexican government may bring administrative and criminal proceedings, impose economic sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or even permanently close non-complying facilities.
The risk of incurring environmental liability is inherent in the railroad industry. As part of serving the petroleum and chemicals industry, the Company transports hazardous materials and has a professional team available to respond to and handle environmental issues that might occur in the transport of such materials.
The Company performs ongoing reviews and assessesevaluations of the risks associated withvarious environmental programs and issues within the Company’s compensation practices, policiesoperations, and, programs applicableas necessary, takes actions intended to employeeslimit the Company’s exposure to determine whetherpotential liability. Although these costs cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the risks arising from such practices, policies and programs are appropriate or reasonably likely toultimate outcome of identified matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Personal Injury. The Company’s personal injury liability is based on semi-annual actuarial studies performed on an undiscounted basis by an independent third party actuarial firm and reviewed by management. This liability is based on personal injury claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Actual results may vary from estimates due to the number, type and severity of the injury, costs of medical treatments and uncertainties in litigation. Adjustments to the liability are reflected within operating expenses in the period in which changes to estimates are known. Personal injury claims in excess of self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage amounts, depending on the type of claim and year of occurrence. The personal injury liability as of December 31, 2022, is based on an updated actuarial study of personal injury claims through October 31, 2022, and review of the last two months’ experience. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized an increase of $1.4 million in personal injury liability due to changes in estimates as a result of the Company’s semi-annual actuarial studies and $18.3 million due to accruals, including unfavorable judgments on claims filed against the Company. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $15.6 million due to payments made on claims during 2022.
Required Qualifications
81
:

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The Compensation Committee consistspersonal injury liability activity was as follows (in millions):
20222021
Balance at beginning of year$32.6 $31.3 
Accruals18.3 6.3 
Changes in estimate1.4 (1.4)
Payments(15.6)(3.6)
Balance at end of year$36.7 $32.6 
Tax Contingencies. Information regarding tax contingencies is included in Note 13, Income Taxes — Tax Contingencies.
Contractual Agreements. In the normal course of three Directors elected bybusiness, the Board, takingCompany enters into considerationvarious contractual agreements related to commercial arrangements and the recommendationsuse of other railroads’ or governmental entities’ infrastructure needed for the operations of the Nominating Committee,business. The Company is involved or may become involved in certain disputes involving transportation rates, product loss or damage, charges, and interpretations related to serve
one-year
terms.
these agreements. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that, when resolved, these disputes will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
On July 14, 2022, KCSM reached an agreement with the SICT to fund a new investment in the Celaya-NBA Line Railway Bypass and related infrastructure in an amount not to exceed Ps.4.0 billion (approximately $200.0 million USD). In exchange for the investment, the SICT agreed to amend KCSM’s Concession Title effective July 14, 2022, to extend the exclusivity rights granted to KCSM for an additional period of 10 years. Under this amendment, KCSM’s exclusivity will now expire in 2037.
Each memberCredit Risk. The Company continually monitors risks related to economic changes and certain customer receivables concentrations. Significant changes in customer concentration or payment terms, deterioration of customer creditworthiness, bankruptcy, insolvency or liquidation of a customer, or weakening in economic trends could have a significant impact on the collectability of the Compensation Committee is independent (as definedCompany’s receivables and its operating results. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate and result in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The Company has recorded provisions for uncollectability based on its best estimate as of December 31, 2022.
Panama Canal Railway Company (”PCRC”) Guarantees and Indemnities. At December 31, 2022, the NYSE’s listing standards)Company had issued and is consideredoutstanding $5.8 million under a
non-employee
director standby letter of credit to fulfill its obligation to fund fifty percent of the debt service reserve and liquidity reserve established by PCRC in connection with the issuance of the 7.0% Senior Secured Notes due November 1, 2026 (the “PCRC Notes”). Additionally, KCS has pledged its shares of PCRC as security for purposes of Rule
16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
PCRC Notes.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

Committee Members
: Robert Druten (Chair); Lydia Beebe; Antonio Garza, Jr.; Thomas McDonnell
Primary responsibilities
:
Recommends to the Board of Directors suitable nominees for election to the Board or to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board.
Reviews Company governance policies and procedures and develops and recommends to the Board changes and additions to such governance policies and procedures
Establishes and maintains procedures for evaluation of Board and management performance;
Periodically evaluates the performance of the Board and its committees
Reviews stockholder proposals and recommends to the Board responses to such proposals
Oversees the Company’s commitment to environmental, social and related governance (“ESG”) matters that are significant to the Company.
Required Qualifications
:
The Nominating Committee consists of four Directors elected by the Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Nominating Committee, to serve
one-year
terms.
Each member of the Nominating Committee is independent (as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards).
8
82

Table of Contents


Finance & Strategic Investment Committee
Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

Note 17. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
FourthThirdSecondFirst
 (In millions, except per share amounts)
2022
Revenues$864.5 $882.2 $845.5 $778.2 
Operating income (i)298.2 325.0 312.8 291.1 
Net income (ii)400.0 201.7 194.1 188.0 
Net income attributable to Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries399.4 201.3 194.1 187.4 
2021
Revenues$747.8 $744.0 $749.5 $706.0 
Operating income (loss) (iii)810.6 251.9 (431.7)253.0 
Net income (loss)595.1 156.5 (378.0)153.4 
Net income (loss) attributable to Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries594.5 156.2 (378.5)153.0 
_____________________
(i) During the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2022, the Company recognized pre-tax net merger costs of $12.8 million, $12.5 million, $11.5 million, and $9.8 million, respectively, related to the Company’s merger with CP.
(ii) During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company recognized the gain on settlement of the interest rate derivative instruments of $259.3 million. Refer to Note 10, Derivative Instruments for more information.
(iii) During the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2021, the Company recognized pre-tax net merger costs (income) of $19.3 million, $720.8 million, $36.5 million, and $(512.6) million, respectively, related to the Company’s various merger activities. The large fluctuations between the quarters are driven by the recognition and reversal of merger termination fees. For the year ended December 31, 2021, KCS incurred $1,400.0 million of merger termination fees, completely offset by the recovery of $1,400.0 million of merger termination fees recognized in merger costs, net within the consolidated statements of income. See more details in Note 3, Merger Agreement.



Committee Members
: Lu Córdova (Chair); Janet Kennedy; Mitchell Krebs; Henry Maier; Thomas McDonnell
Primary responsibilities
:
Reviews and approves financing transactions exceeding $50 million, but not exceeding $500 million.83

Table of Contents



Kansas City Southern and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Note 18. Geographic Information
The Company strategically manages its rail operations as one reportable business segment over a single coordinated rail network that extends from the midwest and southeast portions of the United States south into Mexico and connects with other Class I railroads. Financial information reported at this level, such as revenues, operating income and cash flows from operations, is used by corporate management, including the Company’s chief operating decision-maker, in evaluating overall financial and operational performance, market strategies, as well as the decisions to allocate capital resources. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is the chief executive officer.
The following tables provide information by geographic area (in millions):
Years ended December 31,
 202220212020
Revenues
U.S.$1,816.2 $1,580.6 $1,388.5 
Mexico1,554.2 1,366.7 1,244.1 
Total revenues$3,370.4 $2,947.3 $2,632.6 

December 31,
20222021
Property and equipment (including Concession assets), net
U.S.$5,885.3 $5,744.4 
Mexico3,477.1 3,464.9 
Total property and equipment (including Concession assets), net$9,362.4 $9,209.3 

Note 19. Subsequent Events
KCS Dividend to CP
On February 1, 2023, KCS paid a cash dividend of $225.0 million to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP.
Foreign Currency Hedging
At December 31, 2022, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $535.0 million, which matured during January 2023 and obligated the Company to sell a total of Ps.11,235.2 million at a weighted-average rate of Ps.21.0 to each U.S. dollar. During January 2023, the Company entered into offsetting contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $581.4 million, which matured during January 2023 and obligated the Company to purchase a total of Ps.11,235.2 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of Ps.19.3 to each U.S. dollar, resulting in cash paid of $46.4 million.
During January 2023, the Company entered into several foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $250.0 million and maturity dates in 2023 and 2024. These contracts obligated the Company to sell a total of Ps.5,114.6 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of Ps.20.5 to each U.S. dollar.
The Company has not designated these foreign currency derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The Company will measure the foreign currency derivative instruments at fair value each period and will recognize any change in fair value in foreign exchange gain (loss) within the consolidated statements of income.
Reviews management’s financing plans and reports
84

Table of Contents
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not Applicable.
Make recommendations
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the BoardCompany’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Company’s management, with respect to matters affecting our financing plan and capital structure
Monitors the Company’s risk management practices relating to foreign exchange and interest rates.
Required Qualifications
:
The Finance Committee consists of four Directors elected by the Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Nominating Committee, to serve
one-year
terms.
Executive Committee
Committee Members
: Robert Druten (Chair); Antonio Garza, Jr.; Patrick Ottensmeyer
Primary responsibilities
:
When the Board is not in session, the Executive Committee has all the powers of the Board in all cases in which specific directions have not been given by the Board.
Required Qualifications
:
The Executive Committee consistsparticipation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the Chaireffectiveness of the Board,design and one other Director electedoperation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022.  Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to accomplish their objectives at a reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) is included as “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s financial statements contained herein, also audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. The audit report is included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.  

Item 9B.Other Information
None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not Applicable.


85

Part III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
(a) Directors of the Company
The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company’s Form 10-K/A, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Executive Officers of the Company
See “Executive Officers of KCS and Subsidiaries” in Part I, Item 1 of this annual report incorporated by reference herein for information about the executive officers of the Company.
(c) Changes to Shareholder Nominating Procedures
On December 14, 2021, as a result of the merger with CP, CP acquired the outstanding common and preferred stock of KCS.Therefore, the Company is no longer an independent company. Because the Company’s common stock is now wholly owned by the Voting Trust, the Company’s Board taking into considerationof Directors no longer has a formal procedure for stockholders to recommend nominees to the recommendationsCompany’s Board of Directors.
(d) Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts
The information required by this Item will be contained in the Nominating Committee, to serve a
one-year
term.
Company’s Form 10-K/A, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Section 16(a)(e) Code of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock (collectively “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of their ownership of such stock and changes in such ownership with the SEC (the “Section 16 Reports”). Based solely on a review of the Section 16 Reports for 2021 and written representations from certain of the Reporting Persons, we believe no Reporting Person was late in filing such Section 16 Reports for fiscal year 2021.Ethics
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) that applies to all directors, officers (including, among others, the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and employees of theemployees. The Company andhas posted its subsidiaries. The Code of Ethics embodies our principleson its website (www.kcsouthern.com) and practices relating to the ethical conduct of our business and our commitment to honesty, fair dealing and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our Code is available in the “Investors” - “Corporate Governance” – “Governance Documents” section under the “About Us” tab of our website at www.kcsouthern.com and in print to any stockholder who requests it. Although it is the general policy of the Company not to grant waivers of the Code, any waiver of compliance with the Code with respect to any director or executive officer may be granted solely by the Board, which may adopt appropriate controls to safeguard the interests of our stockholders. Any waiver that is granted, and the basis for granting the waiver, will be publicly communicated as appropriate, including posting on our website, as soon as practicable. We granted no waivers under the Code in 2021. The Company will post on its website any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of its Code of Ethics that apply to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer as required by applicable SEC and NYSE rules and regulations.

Item 11.Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company’s Form 10-K/A, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.

9
86

CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY & RESPONSIBILITY
Table of Contents
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The Board recognizes the increasing importance of environmental and social issues to our company and stockholders, including risks associated with climate change. Oversight and monitoring of such risks is assigned to the Nominating Committee, demonstrating the importance of such issues to the Company and its future.
In addition to the sustainability and responsibility information provided herein, KCS publishes sustainability information, prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards. The Company’s 2020 Sustainability Report is available under the “Corporate Responsibility” tab of our website at www.kcsouthern.com. A new 2021 Sustainability Data Updaterequired by this Item will be issued later this spring. The information provided on the Company’s website is referenced in this Form
10-K/A
for informational purposes only. Neither the information on the Company’s website, nor the informationcontained in the Company’s 2020 Sustainability Report, shallForm 10-K/A, which will be deemedfiled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Refer to Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 15, Share-Based Compensation for more information.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item will be a part of, orcontained in the Company’s Form 10-K/A, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference intoreference.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company’s Form
10-K/A, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.
or any other filings we make with the SEC.


10
87

2021 Sustainability & Responsibility Highlights
Environmental
•  Rail transportation is the most energy efficient way to move freight over land. In 2021, KCS moved each ton of freight approximately 419 miles on average on only one gallon of fuel.
•  KCS provides a carbon calculator to its customers on its website to estimate the greenhouse gas emission savings potential associated with shipping by rail vs. truck.
•  In 2021, KCS committed to a science-based carbon emissions reduction target approved by the Science Based Targets Initiative. KCS will reduce Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions by at least 42% per million gross
ton-miles
by 2034, compared to 2019, the base year.
•  To optimize our fuel efficiency, KCS’s fuel conservation team drives fuel conservation and efficiency initiatives by:
•  Implementing strategies to improve fuel efficiency, including multiple fuel saving technologies in our locomotives
•  Managing
horsepower-per-ton
compliance
•  Forecasting fuel consumption and providing monthly goals and reports with recommendations
•  Analyzing fuel burn and efficiency data to identify opportunities and trends
•  Managing vendor and program compliance
•  In 2021, KCS avoided the use of 25.7M gallons of diesel fuel which would be 17.0% of our annual fuel consumption if these fuel conservation and efficiency initiatives were not implemented.
•  KCS is committed to reducing plastic waste in the environment and continues to uphold its pledge to Operation Clean Sweep a campaign by the Plastic Industry Association and American Chemistry Council’s Plastics Division by stewarding its best management practices within our organization and with our partners.
Safety
•  The consolidated 2021 rate of reportable workplace injuries and illnesses decreased by 6% from 2020.
•  The KCS Health, Safety, Security & Environmental Management System covers 100% of operations.
•  KCS has been a Responsible Care Partner since 1999.
•  KCS had the
best-in-class
Engineering and Mechanical U.S. Operations in 2021 compared to other Class I Railroads.
•  The consolidated 2021 rate of reportable train accidents decreased by 13% from 2020; total train accidents decreased by 22%
11

Item 11.
Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
The Company’s vision is to consistently be the fastest-growing, best-performing, most customer-focused transportation provider in North America. As the Compensation Committee evaluated the Company’s incentive programs in 2021, it took into consideration the Company’s vision, along with its strategy to:
Capitalize on the strategic location of the KCS cross-border rail network and the diverse and growing North American markets, while maintaining a commitment to operational excellence.
Embrace new and emerging technologies while maintaining a strong cost discipline within a safe and reliable environment.
Provide service that consistently exceeds our customers’ expectations.
Offer challenging careers to our employees.
Produce industry-leading stockholder returns.
The Compensation Committee focused on optimizing the Company’s incentive programs by reviewing performance metrics to ensure continued alignment with its vision and strategy, and balance key drivers of stockholder value. As discussed in the short and long-term incentive plan descriptions, the Compensation Committee elected to continue using operating ratio, operating cash flow and return on invested capital as the core metrics used to determine incentive award payouts. These metrics provide incentives to achieve revenue growth, strong cost discipline and efficient capital deployment. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved several operational objectives to provide incentives to achieve improvements in network performance and safety. The Compensation Committee also elected to retain the revenue multiplier, as it further rewards achievement of industry-leading growth.
The fundamental design of the 2021 compensation programs was similar to prior years. The Company used the 50th percentile of its peer group as well as the 25th percentile of the Class I railroads as a guideline for setting the various components of our executives’ compensation, and the majority of our named executives’ compensation was performance-based.
As detailed in Part II, Item 7 of the 2021 Form
10-K,
the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, a Canadian corporation (“CP”). Any capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the 2021 Form
10-K.
The effects of the merger on the Company’s incentive plans and compensation of the NEOs are described below.
Short-Term Incentive Plan
In February 2021, the Compensation Committee established the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) to provide incentives for the achievement of annual performance goals. After evaluating various performance metrics, the Compensation Committee concluded that achievement under the 2021 AIP should continue to be based on the Company’s consolidated operating ratio (“OR”) and operating cash flow (“OCF”), as defined below and in the 2021 AIP. In addition, operational objectives consisting of trip plan compliance (“TPC”), reportable injury frequency ratio (“IFR”) and reportable train accident frequency ratio (“AFR”) were introduced for 2021 to align with improvements in overall safety, network performance and customer service levels versus 2020 performance. The Compensation Committee believes that this will foster cross functional collaboration and coordination of initiatives and process improvements necessary to drive improvements in key performance indicators. The weighting of each metric is set forth in the “2021 Compensation Decisions” section below.
The total financial and operational metric achievements may be adjusted, either downward or upward, based on the Company’s revenue growth relative to all other North American Class I railroads. The maximum adjustment increases the payout by 20% if the Company achieves industry-leading revenue growth. Similarly, the AIP payout can be adjusted downward by 20% if the Company’s revenue growth is lower than all other North American Class I railroads. This adjustment based on relative revenue growth appropriately focuses on the Company’s goal of being the fastest growing transportation company in North America.
12

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the performance goals will be deemed achieved at the greater of (i) target performance and (ii) 130% of actual performance, but in no event greater than 200% of target.
In February 2021, the Compensation Committee determined, after applying the Merger Agreement provision described above, that the Company achieved an overall performance level of 110% - 112% of target under the 2021 AIP for each NEO, other than Mr. Hancock, as set forth in the “2021 Compensation Decisions” section below.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In order to balance short-term goals with long-term stockholder value creation, in February 2021, the Compensation Committee adopted the 2021-2023 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2021 LTI Program”). Performance shares comprise 50% of the overall value of the 2021 LTI Program. The remaining 50% of the awards under the 2021 LTI Program are made in the form of time-based restricted stock (25%) and stock options (25%). For performance share grants under the 2021 LTI Program, Return on Invested Capital, as defined below and in the 2021 LTI Program (“ROIC”), has a 75% weighting, and OR has a 25% weighting. Both metrics are measured over a three-year performance period.
The Compensation Committee believes that the relative weighting of ROIC and OR in the 2021 LTI Program promotes the appropriate balance between management’s focus on margin improvement and strong returns on capital deployed, effectively aligning the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the Company’s executives. Once a payout based on the weighted average ROIC and OR has been calculated, the payout may be further adjusted, either downward or upward, based on the Company’s three-year revenue growth relative to all other North American Class I railroads. The maximum adjustment increases the payout by 20% if the Company achieves industry-leading revenue growth.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the performance goals will be deemed achieved at 200% of target, and the awards will be converted into a cash award equal to $301.20 per share (the “Merger Consideration Value”).
Retention Plan & Special Bonus
In connection with its efforts to promote retention and incentivize the completion of the merger, on May 21, 2021, the Company granted retention awards to each of Messrs. Ottensmeyer, Upchurch, Songer, Naatz and Godderz, respectively (the “Retention Awards”). The Company also awarded to certain executives, including Messrs. Upchurch and Godderz, a
one-time
cash award in recognition of the additional responsibilities they assumed in connection with negotiating the Merger Agreement with CP. Additional information and amounts awarded to each NEO are set forth below in the 2021 Compensation Decisions and in the Summary Compensation Table.
Named Executive Officers
Current NEOs
Patrick J. OttensmeyerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Michael W. UpchurchExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jeffrey M. SongerExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
13

Michael J. NaatzExecutive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Adam J. GodderzSenior Vice President - Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Brian D. HancockFormer Executive Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer*
*
Mr. Hancock retired from the Company on July 2, 2021.
2021
Say-On-Pay
Vote on Executive Compensation
At the 2021 Annual Meeting, stockholders representing 52.20% of the votes cast at the meeting voted in favor of the 2020 compensation of the NEOs. The Compensation Committee reviewed the analysis of proxy voting firms as well as shareholder feedback and determined the low approval percentage was due to certain changes in severance provisions adopted as a result of ongoing merger discussions. These changes are described below in the “Narrative to Summary Compensation” section. Other than changes to severance protections, the compensation programs established by our Compensation Committee remained substantially the same for 2021.
Primary Elements of Compensation
The primary elements of our 2021 executive compensation package are described below. Each year the Compensation Committee determines the incentive programs to adopt and establishes participation, awards and performance measures, considering general market practices and an assessment of the effectiveness of such programs in meeting its goals.
Compensation Element
Purpose
Characteristic
Base Salary
To provide a fixed element of pay for an individual’s primary duties and responsibilities.Base salaries are reviewed annually and are set based on performance, experience, competitiveness versus market and internal equity considerations.
Annual Incentive
To encourage and reward the achievement of specified financial and operational goals on an annual basis.Performance-based cash award opportunity; amount earned is based on actual results relative to
pre-determined
goals.
Long-Term Incentives
Performance Share Awards
To motivate management for long-term financial success and value creation for stockholders.Three-year performance-based share awards with
pre-determined
financial goals.
Restricted Share Awards
To align the executives’ interests with those of investors (via creation of stockholder value), to encourage stock ownership and to provide an incentive for retention.Service-based long-term incentive opportunity; ultimate award value depends on share price.
14

Compensation Element
Purpose
Characteristic
Non-Qualified
Stock Options
To incentivize and reward the creation of long-term stockholder value.Service-based long-term incentive opportunity; amounts realized are dependent upon share price appreciation.
Other Elements of Compensation
We provide certain benefit programs that are designed to be competitive within the marketplace from which we recruit our employees. The majority of employee benefits provided to our NEOs are offered through broad-based plans available to our management employees generally.
KCS 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the “KCS 401(k) Plan”)
. The KCS 401(k) Plan is a qualified defined contribution plan. Eligible U.S. employees may elect to make
pre-tax
or
post-tax
deferral contributions, called 401(k) contributions, to the KCS 401(k) Plan of up to 75% of eligible compensation subject to certain limits under the Code. We match contributions to the KCS 401(k) Plan equal to 100% of a participant’s 401(k) contributions and up to the lesser of 5% of a participant’s eligible compensation or the statutory limit imposed by the Code. Our matching contributions for the KCS 401(k) Plan vest over five years as follows:
0% for less than two years of service;
20% upon two years of service;
40% upon three years of service;
60% upon four years of service; and
100% upon five years of service.
We may also make, in our discretion, annual profit sharing contributions to the KCS 401(k) Plan in an amount not to exceed the maximum allowable deduction for federal income tax purposes and certain limits under the Code. Only employees who have met certain standards as to hours of service are eligible to receive profit sharing contributions. No minimum contribution is required. Each eligible participant, subject to maximum allocation limitations under the Code, is allocated the same percentage of the total contribution as the participant’s compensation bears to the total compensation of all participants. Profit sharing contributions are 100% vested when made. No profit sharing contributions were made in 2021.
Participants may direct the investment of their accounts in the KCS 401(k) Plan by selecting from one or more of the diversified investment funds available under the KCS 401(k) Plan.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company amended the terms of the KCS 401(k) Plan to account for the effects of the merger, including automatic vesting of any unvested Company contributions to the participant’s 401(k) account upon the date that CP takes control of the Company (the “Control Date”).
Executive Plan
. We maintain a supplemental benefit plan known as the “Executive Plan” for those U.S. executives who are designated by the President, Chief Executive Officer or Compensation Committee as participants in the Executive Plan. Our Executive Plan provides a benefit based on an amount equal to 10% of the excess of (a) the greater of (i) an amount equal to 145% (or such other percentage as set forth in the participant’s employment agreement) of the participant’s annual base salary for the applicable year (see the “Summary Compensation Table — Narrative to Summary Compensation ”) or (ii) the sum of the participant’s base salary earned for the year plus any short-term incentive that was earned during the applicable year, over (b) the maximum compensation that can be considered for benefit purposes in a qualified retirement plan. Payments are generally made annually under this plan and participants receive such payments in one year, cliff-vested restricted stock, issued under the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) which may be forfeited in the event of
15

termination of employment prior to the end of the twelve-consecutive-month period beginning on the grant date. The number of restricted shares awarded will be such that the total value of the restricted shares awarded as determined on the grant date is equal to 125% (or such greater percentage as the Compensation Committee may determine, which percentage may vary from year to year) of the participant’s annual benefit amount.
As a result of entering into the Voting Trust, the Executive Plan was amended so that participants receive the annual benefit amount payments as
lump-sum
cash payments within the first 2
1
2
months of the calendar year following the calendar year for which the annual benefit is earned.
Kansas City Southern Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “KCS NQDC Plan”)
. In August 2018, the Company adopted the KCS NQDC Plan, which is a
non-qualified
deferred compensation plan. Eligible employees may elect to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 75% of their annual short-term incentive compensation. Participants may direct the investment of their accounts in the KCS NQDC Plan by selecting from one or more of the diversified investment funds available in the KCS NQDC Plan. Participant deferrals are 100% vested at all times.
Although the KCS NQDC Plan allows for the Company to credit company contributions to any participant’s account in any amount determined by the Company (“Company Contributions”), the Company did not make any such contributions in 2021. Company Contributions may be made in the form of a matching contribution, a
non-elective
contribution or both and may be made in accordance with any formula selected by the Company, which formula may be different from year to year. Company Contributions may be subject to any vesting schedule determined by the Company at the time of the credit. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, fully vest the participants’ accounts on a change in control. No NEO participated in the KCS NQDC Plan in 2021.
In November 2021, the KCS NQDC Plan was amended to allow deferral of additional types of compensation.
Perquisites
. As noted in our Summary Compensation Table, we provide our NEOs with limited perquisites consistent with prevailing market practice. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive compensation structure for our NEOs.
We reimburse financial counseling expense for our NEOs up to a stated limit in accordance with the KCS Financial Planning Reimbursement Policy. The maximum amount of the annual reimbursement under this policy for our CEO and our other NEOs is $15,000. We also pay for three years of the administrative fees charged by the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation (“GKCCF”) related to donor advised funds established by our U.S. executives at the GKCCF. These fees are paid out of funds from the Company’s charitable foundation, which is administered by the GKCCF. We pay for an annual executive physical for our NEOs to help them maintain optimal health through preventative care. We also provide the CEO use of the Company’s aircraft up to a maximum of the lesser of (a) $100,000 of additional costs and expenses incurred as a result of such personal use or (b) 24 roundtrip flights. The Company provides certain other
de minimis
perquisites as described in the Summary Compensation Table below.
The Compensation Committee believes these perquisites are conservative, but reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program, industry practice and applicable law, and better enable the Company to attract and retain high-performing employees for key positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs.
Other Benefits
. We also pay a portion of premiums for medical coverage, pay premiums for short-term disability coverage, pay premiums for 60% coverage for long-term disability (up to a maximum of $15,000 per month) and pay premiums for AD&D coverage up to 2
1
/
2
times the annual salary for each employee up to a maximum of $500,000. For executives, we provide a basic amount of group life insurance coverage. Additionally, we provided eligible employees with the opportunity to purchase KCS Common Stock at a discount under the Kansas City Southern 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which such plan is intended to satisfy Section 423 of the Code. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the last purchase date under the ESPP occurred on June 30, 2020 and the ESPP was discontinued effective July 1, 2021.
16

Severance and Termination Benefits
Various compensation arrangements provide for accelerated vesting and separation pay for our NEOs upon termination of employment in various situations, including upon a change in control. These arrangements are designed to:
preserve our ability to compete for executive talent;
provide stability during a change in control by encouraging executives to cooperate with and achieve a change in control approved by the Board, without being distracted by the possibility of termination of employment or demotion after the change in control; and
provide an economic incentive to encourage an acquirer to evaluate whether to retain our executives in addition to its own.
Each of our NEOs is a party to a severance agreement. Each agreement provides certain benefits in the event of the termination of the NEO’s employment without cause or after a change in control. The agreements do not provide for any benefits in the event of the termination of employment resulting from death, disability or retirement. We believe that providing certain severance protections in the event of a change in control play an important role in attracting and retaining key executive officers. Our Compensation Committee believes the current levels of post-employment termination compensation and benefits are appropriate and consistent with our compensation objectives.
As described in “Narrative to Summary Compensation – Employment and Severance Agreements” below, the Company entered into certain letter agreements with each NEO that amended the terms of their severance agreement in order to provide additional retention incentives as part of the Company’s acquisition by CP.
Pay Mix
The percentage of a NEO’s total compensation resulting from each of the compensation elements is not specifically determined, but instead is a result of the targeted competitive positioning for each element. By design,
“at-risk”
components (particularly long-term incentives) comprise a significant portion of each NEO’s total compensation. This is consistent with the Compensation Committee’s desire to reward long-term performance in a way that is aligned with stockholders’ interests. In 2021, the target pay mix for our Chief Executive Officer and all other NEOs serving on December 31, 2021 (as an average) was as follows:
Pay Mix
 
   CEO  Other NEOs 
Base Salary
   15  28
Short - Term Incentive
   17  21
Stock Options
   17  13
Performance Shares
   34  25
Restricted Stock
   17  13
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total
   100  100
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
17

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee has set stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs and other members of senior management, which require executives to own shares of Company Common Stock that have a value at least equal to a multiple of their salary as set forth in the following table:
Multiple of
Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer
5X
Other NEOs
3X
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the continued appropriateness of the stock ownership guidelines. Executives are given five years from the date they are first subject to the ownership requirement to meet the required stock ownership thresholds. All stock sales by executives who are not in compliance will be reviewed by the Corporate Secretary and approved by the CEO. If executives have not met this stock ownership requirement within five years, then they may be required to retain long-term incentive plan grants and 50% of AIP payouts may be awarded in stock until the executive is compliant.
Shares that count in determining compliance with the stock ownership guidelines are shares beneficially owned by the executive, shares held by the executive in any KCS benefit plan, restricted shares at the time of grant (even if not yet vested), performance shares when earned (even if not yet vested) and shares issued and retained on exercise of stock options.
As a result of entering into Voting Trust, the stock ownership guidelines were eliminated on December 14, 2021.
Participants in the Compensation Process
Compensation Committee
. The Compensation Committee, which is responsible for establishing our executive compensation policies and overseeing our executive compensation practices, is composed of three directors. Each of these directors meet the independence requirements of the NYSE and are considered
non-employee
directors under Rule
16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
Role of Meridian, our 2021 Compensation Consultant
. For assistance in fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC as its compensation consultant to review and independently assess various aspects of our compensation programs and to advise the Compensation Committee in making its executive compensation decisions for 2021. Meridian is engaged by and reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Meridian pursuant to SEC rules, analyzed whether the work performed raised any conflict of interest, and concluded that Meridian is independent and that no conflict of interest exists. In assessing Meridian’s independence, the Compensation Committee also considers the nature and amount of work performed for the Compensation Committee during the year, the nature of any unrelated services performed by the consultant for the Company, and the fees paid for those services in relation to the firm’s total revenues. Every year, the consultant prepares for the Compensation Committee an independence letter providing assurances and confirmation of the consultant’s independent status under the noted standards.
Meridian’s role in 2021 was to provide market data, including market trend data, to the Compensation Committee, to advise the Compensation Committee regarding the Company’s executive and director compensation relative to the market, and to make recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation structure and components.
In 2021, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, Meridian compiled an executive compensation market analysis based on data provided by a third party, to assess the competitiveness of the compensation of the executives of the Company, including the NEOs. This study was used to inform decisions regarding 2021 programs and grants.
18

The results of the analysis for 2021 compensation were discussed with the Compensation Committee in February 2021. Meridian analyzed the market competitiveness of the following elements for each of the executive positions contained in this analysis:
base salary;
target AIP opportunity;
target total cash compensation (base salary plus target AIP opportunity);
grant date fair value of long-term incentive grants/awards; and
target total direct compensation (target total cash compensation plus the grant date fair value of long-term incentive awards).
In addition, Meridian provided market data and recommendations regarding merger related compensation including special bonuses, retention awards and severance provisions.
Peer Group
In connection with this analysis and prior benchmarking analyses, the Compensation Committee with Meridian’s input defined the Company’s primary competitive market as mature, capital-intensive companies with annual revenues generally between $1 billion and $6 billion. In 2021, with respect to our NEOs, this group was comprised of the following 23 companies.
A. O. Smith CorporationITT Inc.
Alliant Energy CorporationKennametal Inc.
Atmos Energy CorporationMarathon Oil Company
Canadian Pacific RailwayMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.OGE Energy Corp.
Curtiss-Wright CorporationPinnacle West Capital Corporation
EQT Corporation
Snap-on
Incorporated
Evergy, Inc.Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
Flowserve CorporationThe Timken Company
GATX CorporationTrinity Industries, Inc.
Hexcel CorporationVulcan Materials Company
IDEX Corporation
The Company also reviews the compensation of officers and other employees of the other Class I railroads. The rail industry is a relatively small industry with a unique set of skills that are highly transferable and desirable across all railroads. Although the Company’s peer group does not include any other Class I railroads, other than Canadian Pacific Railway, due to the size of such companies, the Compensation Committee believes that the compensation of the officers and employees at such other companies is important in evaluating the competitiveness of the Company’s compensation levels and the design of the pay programs.
We believe it is appropriate to provide industry-competitive total compensation opportunities to our NEOs in order to attract and retain top executive talent. However, we do not rely on this information to target any specific pay percentile for our executive officers. Instead, we use this information to provide a general overview of market practices and to ensure that we make informed decisions regarding our executive pay programs.
19

Conclusions of Compensation Committee
The results of the study conducted by the Compensation Committee with Meridian’s input generally found that the NEOs are being compensated competitively compared to the market median given their positions and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee determines the amount of such awards by referencing the competitive market data of awards for comparable positions in the Company’s peer group and the Class I railroads.
The Compensation Committee reviewed with its Compensation Consultant the terms of the Retention Awards and the special cash awards that were granted to certain executives in connection with the merger, and found them to be appropriate and in the best interests of the Company.
Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program
The Company also engaged Meridian to review its compensation program to assess the risks that it could create, as reflected in the Company’s risk management practices and policies. The review covered a number of key facets of the Company’s compensation plans, including their purposes, the types of performance measures used, the number and organizational level of participants, the aggregate amount and maximum individual amounts payable under the plans, and how the Company’s risk management policies and governance practices, including stock ownership requirements and clawback policies, are structured to mitigate these risks. As a result of this review, the Committee concluded that the Company’s compensation program does not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company or its stockholders.
The Compensation & Organization Committee annually reviews and assess the risks associated with the Company’s compensation practices, policies and programs applicable to employees to determine whether the risks arising from such practices, policies and programs are appropriate or reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
2021 Compensation Decisions
2021 Salary Adjustments
In February 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a 3.4% increase in base salary for Mr. Ottensmeyer, a 3% increase for Messrs. Hancock and Naatz, a 3.1% increase for Mr. Songer, a 3.6% increase for Mr. Upchurch, and a 6.5% increase for Mr. Godderz. Base salaries are set based on performance, experience and competitiveness versus market and internal equity considerations.
2021 Short-Term Incentive Plan
In February 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan for our NEOs. Similar to the AIP in prior years, each NEO was assigned incentive targets at the threshold, target and maximum incentive performance levels that are a percentage of the NEO’s 2021 base salary. The target percentage assigned to each NEO is set forth in the following table:
   
Percentage of Base Salary
 
Current Officers
  
Threshold
Performance Level
  
Target
Performance Level
  
Maximum
Performance Level
 
Mr. Ottensmeyer
   0  115  230
Mr. Upchurch
   0  75  150
Mr. Songer
   0  80  160
Mr. Naatz
   0  70  140
20

   
Percentage of Base Salary
 
Current Officers
  
Threshold
Performance Level
  
Target
Performance Level
  
Maximum
Performance Level
 
Mr. Godderz
   0  65  130
Mr. Hancock
   0  70  140
For 2021, the Compensation Committee determined to use OR, OCF, TPC, IFR and AFR as the performance metrics for our NEOs under the 2021 AIP, weighted as follows:
   
OR
  
OCF
  
Operational Objectives
 
 
TPC
  
Safety
 
 
IFR
  
AFR
 
Ottensmeyer
   40  40  10  5  5
Upchurch
   45  45  5  2.5  2.5
Songer
   40  40  10  5  5
Naatz
   45  45  5  2.5  2.5
Godderz
   45  45  5  2.5  2.5
Hancock
   45  45  5  2.5  2.5
The 2021 performance metrics by performance level are summarized in the following chart.
   
Threshold

(0% Payout)
  
Target

(100% Payout)
  
Maximum

(200% Payout)
 
OR
   62.15  59.15% - 59.65  56.90
OCF (in millions)
  $854  $1,024 - $1,057  $1,187 
TPC
   <60.26  60.26% - 63.13  >63.13
IFR
   >1.62   1.62   1.44 
AFR
   >3.35   3.35   2.97 
OR is defined as the Company’s Adjusted Operating Ratio as reported in the Company’s earnings releases, with any necessary adjustments to eliminate the effects of (a) fluctuations in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar from the average exchange rates assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (b) impacts to fuel surcharge revenue and fuel expense for changes in fuel-related indices from the indices assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (c) business combinations or acquisitions transaction impacts, (d) changes in accounting principles, (e) changes in law and (f) as approved by the Compensation Committee, other transactions or events that were not contemplated at the time performance targets were established by the Compensation Committee.
OCF is defined as Operating Income before Depreciation & Amortization, minus accrued capital expenditures, with further adjustments to eliminate the effects of (a) adjustments included in Adjusted Operating Ratio as reported by the Company, (b) fluctuations in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar from the average exchange rates assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (c) impacts to fuel surcharge revenue and fuel expense for changes in fuel-related indices from the indices assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (d) business combinations or acquisitions transaction impacts, (e) changes in accounting principles, (f) changes in laws and (g) as approved by the Compensation Committee, other transactions or events that were not contemplated at the time performance targets were established by the Compensation Committee.
TPC is defined as improvement over Q1 2021 consolidated TPC.
21

IFR is defined as improvement over fiscal year 2020 in the reportable injury frequency ratio for consolidated US and Mexico operations.
AFR is defined as improvement over fiscal year 2020 in the reportable train accident frequency ratio for consolidated US and Mexico operations.
After weighting for each performance metric, payout percentages are calculated on a sliding scale between the threshold and maximum. The payout percentage is then further adjusted based on the Company’s relative revenue growth compared to the other six Class I railroads as set forth in the following table (not to exceed a maximum of 200%):
Rank
Adjustment to Payout Percentage
1
st
120
2
nd
110
2
nd
to last place (6
th
)
90
Last place (7
th
)
80
Any other ranking (3
rd
, 4
th
, or 5
th
)
No adjustment
The Revenue Growth Multiplier (“RGM”) is based on the ranking of revenue growth rate relative to other North American Class I railroads and is determined as follows:
2021 AIP - based on the Company’s annual revenue growth during the
12-month
performance period relative to the annual revenue growth of all other Class 1 railroads over the same time frame. Each Class 1 railroad is then ranked in order of the highest to lowest annual revenue growth rate for the
12-month
performance period.
2021 LTI Program - based on the average of the Company’s annual revenue growth during the
3-year
performance period relative to the average of the annual revenue growth of all other Class 1 railroads over the same time frame. The average of the annual revenue growth for each Class 1 railroad is determined by first calculating the change in revenue for each applicable year and then computing the
3-year
average. Each Class 1 railroad is then ranked in order of the highest to lowest average annual revenue growth rate for the
3-year
performance period.
For purposes of determining revenue growth (“RG”) for the Company and for all other North American Class I railroads, revenue includes (a) total revenue for the most recently reported twelve-month period, including fuel surcharge revenue, (b) adjustments for foreign exchange impacts as disclosed in publicly available information, and (c) adjustments for business combinations, acquisitions or dispositions as disclosed in publicly available information.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the performance results, as determined and calculated under the terms of the 2021 AIP, were as follows, resulting in a payout percentage of 85% for Mr. Ottensmeyer and Songer and 86% for Messrs. Upchurch, Naatz and Godderz prior to the application of the RGM.
22

   
2021 Results
 
OR
   60.28
OCF (in millions)
  $1,032 
TPC
   63.12
IFR
   1.71 
AFR
   3.24 
The Company’s revenue growth in 2021 was fifth among the other Class I railroads resulting in no adjustment to the initial payout percentage.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the performance goals will be deemed achieved at the greater of (i) target performance and (ii) 130% of actual performance but in no event greater than 200% of target. Accordingly, Messrs. Ottensmeyer and Songer earned a 2021 AIP payout of 110% of the target amount and Messrs. Upchurch, Naatz and Godderz earned a 2021 AIP payout of 112% of the target amount. See the Summary Compensation Table for actual amounts paid.
Each year, the Compensation Committee will determine whether an annual incentive program will be adopted for that year and will establish participation, award opportunities and corresponding performance measures and goals, considering general market practices and its own subjective assessment of the effectiveness of such program in meeting its goals of motivating and rewarding executives.
2021 Long-Term Incentive Program
The Compensation Committee designed the 2021 LTI Program to:
Drive sustained improvement in our operating performance;
Communicate strong performance focus to the external market and earn returns well above our cost of capital;
Support execution of our long-term business strategy;
Create long-term stockholder value;
Provide a balanced program based on performance, share price leverage and employee retention;
Maintain flexibility to dovetail with our other talent management tools;
Maintain our external competitiveness; and
Be simple and transparent.
The 2021 LTI Program was approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2021. The mix of awards is as follows:
2021 Long-Term Incentive Mix
Performance Shares
50
Stock Options
25
Restricted Stock
25
23

The following awards were granted to the Company’s NEOs for the 2021 LTI Program:
Current Officers
  
Number of Target
Performance
Shares Granted Under
the 2021

LTI Program
   
Number of Non-Incentive

Stock
Options Granted Under the
2021

LTI Program
   
Number of Shares of
Restricted Stock
Granted
Under the 2021 LTI
Program
 
Mr. Ottensmeyer
   11,369    20,429    5,685 
Mr. Upchurch
   2,821    5,069    1,410 
Mr. Songer*
   2,399    4,311    3,568 
Mr. Naatz
   2,271    4,082    1,136 
Mr. Godderz
   1,516    2,724    758 
Mr. Hancock
   2,271    4,082    1,136 
*
Mr. Songer received a
one-time
$500,000 increase in his restricted stock award value in recognition of his continuing role in leading the Company’s ongoing Precision Scheduled Railroading strategy and to ensure his retention during the negotiations and potential acquisition of the Company.
Performance Shares
: In 2021, the NEOs received performance share awards that can be earned based on the achievement of financial goals over a three-year performance period. The performance metrics used under the 2021 LTI Program are ROIC (weighted 75%) and OR (weighted 25%) with
pre-established
goals for each year of the three-year performance period. The average of the results for each year as measured against these performance goals at the end of the three-year performance period is then used to determine a preliminary payout percentage. Because a key part of the Company’s strategy is to have superior revenue growth in the industry, the preliminary payout percentage may be further adjusted based on the Company’s relative revenue growth compared to the other six Class I railroads as set forth in the following table:
Rank
Adjustment to Payout
Percentage
1
st
120
2
nd
110
2
nd
to last place (6
th
)
90
Last place (7
th
)
80
Any other ranking (3
rd
, 4
th
, or 5
th
)
No adjustment
The preliminary payout percentage, together with any adjustment for the Company’s relative revenue growth during the three-year performance period, is then multiplied by the total number of shares awarded at target to determine the number of performance shares earned. The Compensation Committee decided this was an appropriate manner to determine the shares earned, as it promotes alignment between executives’ long-term incentive compensation with our multi-year business plan as well as with the interests of our stockholders.
Management may earn between 0% and 200% of the target performance share award by meeting or exceeding the performance criteria set for the three-year period. The performance criteria for the three-year plan were set at the February 2021 meeting of the Compensation Committee. The performance shares earned, if any, will vest at the end of the three-year period, on the later of (i) February 23, 2024 or (ii) the date the Compensation Committee certifies the financial results for the three-year performance period.
The Compensation Committee determined to use the Company’s ROIC and OR as the performance metrics for the performance shares under the 2021 LTI Program, weighted 75% and 25%,
respectively. The Compensation Committee believes that ROIC allows it to not only assess the NEO’s performance with respect to our earnings, but
24

also allows the Compensation Committee to measure the efficiency of management in stewarding our capital base and determine the success of management in making long-term capital investment decisions to improve our financial and operating performance. ROIC provides the Compensation Committee a measurement that can hold management accountable for earning a return in excess of our cost of capital.
For this purpose, ROIC is defined as the quotient of the Company’s net operating profit after taxes (“NOPAT”) for the applicable performance period divided by the Company’s invested capital where (i) NOPAT is the sum of the Company’s net income, interest expense and interest on the lease liabilities (all preceding items tax effected), with further adjustments to eliminate the
after-tax
effects of (a) adjustments included in Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share as reported by the Company, (b) fluctuations in the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar from the average exchange rates assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (c) impacts to fuel surcharge revenue and fuel expense for changes in fuel-related indices from the indices assumed in the Company’s 2021 long range plan, (d) changes in statutory income tax rates and other laws enacted after January 1, 2021 on the Company’s net income, (e) business combinations or acquisitions transaction impacts, (f) changes in accounting principles, and (g) as approved by the Compensation Committee, other transactions or events that were not contemplated at the time performance targets were established by the Compensation Committee; and (ii) invested capital is the sum of the Company’s average equity balance and average debt balance (reduced by the average cash balance), with further adjustments to eliminate the average invested capital impacts of (a) changes in accounting principles, (b) business combinations or acquisitions transaction impacts, and (c) as approved by the Compensation Committee, other transactions or events that were not contemplated at the time performance targets were established by the Compensation Committee and (d) changes in statutory income tax rates and other laws enacted after January 1, 2021.
The Compensation Committee determined to use OR as the other performance metric believing it to be a strong indicator of the Company’s financial performance and profitability. The Compensation Committee recognized that OR is a measure easily monitored by our management employees and is widely monitored by investors, and ensures a balance between growth in revenue and continuation of acceptable profit margins.
Following are the performance metrics for and the percentage payouts at each performance level for the 2021 LTI Program*:
Performance Level
  
Return on Invested
Capital
(75% weight)
  
Consolidated Operating
Ratio
(25% weight)
  
Percentage Payout
of Total Incentive
Target
 
2021
    
Threshold
   8.19%   62.15%   0% 
Target
   9.77% - 10.09%   59.15% - 59.65%   100% 
Maximum
   12.150%   56.90%   200% 
2022
    
Threshold
   -120 bp change (1)   +200 bp change (1)   0% 
Target
   +10 bp to +20 bp change (1)   -20 bp to -50 bp change (1)   100% 
Maximum
   +50 bp change (1)   -100 bp change (1)   200% 
2023
    
Threshold
   -120 bp change (1)   +200 bp change (1)   0% 
Target
   +10 bp to +20 bp change (1)   -20 bp to
-50
bp change (1)
   100% 
Maximum
   +50 bp change (1)   -100 bp change (1)   200% 
(1)
Based on the immediately preceding year’s actual results.
25

*
These performance levels should not be viewed as predictions or estimates of future performance and the actual achievement of these levels is subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, those described under “forward looking statements”, “risk factors” or similar headings in our quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC. The Compensation Committee establishes these levels solely to help it align pay with performance. The levels are not intended to provide investors or any other party with guidance about our future financial performance or operating results.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our ROIC and OR, as calculated and determined under the terms of the 2021 LTI Program, was 10.90% and 60.28%, respectfully.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the performance goals for the 2021 LTI Program, as well as the performance shares granted in 2019 and 2020, will be deemed achieved at 200% of target, and the awards will be converted into a cash award equal to the Merger Consideration Value of $301.20 per share and will vest on the respective awards original vest date.
The performance share awards were converted to the following cash amounts for each of the NEOs:
   
2019 LTI Program

(Vest Date – 02/25/2022)
   
2020 LTI Program

(Vest Date – 02/24/2023)
   
2021 LTI Program

(Vest Date – 02/23/2024)
 
Ottensmeyer
  $9,304,068.00   $7,619,155.20   $6,848,685.60 
Upchurch
  $2,078,280.00   $1,775,272.80   $1,699,370.40 
Songer
  $2,051,172.00   $1,775,272.80   $1,445,157.60 
Naatz
  $1,983,100.80   $1,680,696.00   $1,368,050.40 
Godderz
  $1,017,453.60   $942,756.00   $913,238.40 
Hancock
(1)
   N/A    N/A    N/A 
(1)
Mr. Hancock’s awards were forfeited upon his retirement from the Company on July 2, 2021.
Restricted Stock
: In addition to the performance share component of the 2021 LTI Program, the Compensation Committee determined it appropriate that 25%
of the award be in the form of time-based, cliff-vesting, restricted stock of the Company for purposes of acting as a management retention tool during the three-year term of the program. Mr. Songer received a
one-time
$500,000 increase in his restricted stock award value in recognition of his continuing role in leading the Company’s ongoing Precision Scheduled Railroading strategy and to ensure his retention during the negotiations and potential acquisition of the Company. The restricted stock awarded under the 2021 LTI Program vests on February 23, 2024. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the restricted stock vested immediately upon closing into Voting Trust. The amounts paid to each NEO are reflected in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below.
Options
: The other 25% of the award is in the form of time-based,
non-qualified
stock options under the 2021 LTI Program, which provides close alignment between management and stockholders. The options become vested and exercisable in equal installments on February 3, 2022, February 3, 2023 and February 3, 2024, respectively and expire ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the stock options were converted into a cash award equal to the Merger Consideration Value of $301.20 per share minus the option price and paid immediately following the closing into Voting Trust. The amounts paid to each NEO are reflected in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below.
The restricted stock, stock options and performance shares granted to the NEOs were awarded under the 2017 Plan. The purpose of the 2017 Plan is to allow officers, directors, employees and consultants of KCS and its affiliates to acquire or increase equity ownership in the Company. The 2017 Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Company and became immediately effective on May 4, 2017. Equity awards made prior to May 4, 2017, were awarded under the Company’s 2008 Stock Option and Performance Plan (the “2008 Plan”). Upon closing into Voting Trust, both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan were terminated.
26

Merger Related Compensation
As previously described, in May 2021, the Company awarded cash-based retention awards in the amount of $2,120,000; $1,082,000; $1,076,000, $1,018,000 and $980,000 to each of Messrs. Ottensmeyer, Upchurch, Songer, Naatz, and Godderz respectively (the “Retention Awards”) in connection with its efforts to promote retention and incentivize the completion of the merger. On December 17, 2021 in connection with the closing of the merger, the Company paid $530,000; $270,500; $269,000; $254,500; and $245,000 to each of Messrs. Ottensmeyer, Upchurch, Songer, Naatz, and Godderz, which represented 25% of the underling Retention Award. The remaining 75% of the Retention Award will be paid upon on the earlier of (a) 90 days after the Control Date and (b) June 1, 2023, subject, in each case, to the Covered Executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting dates.
On March 21, 2021, in recognition of the additional responsibilities and effort by Mr. Upchurch and Mr. Godderz in connection with the negotiation of the merger, the Company awarded Mr. Upchurch and Mr. Godderz a
one-time
cash award in the amount of $150,000 and $130,000, respectively.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A.
Based on that review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this Company’s annual report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The Compensation Committee:
Henry J. Maier, Chairman
Lydia Beebe
David
Garza-Santos
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During 2021:
no member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of KCS or was formerly an officer of KCS;
no member of the Compensation Committee had any material relationship with KCS other than service on the Board and Board committees and the receipt of compensation for that service;
no executive officer of KCS served as a director or as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee; and
no executive officer of KCS served as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, if the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of KCS.
27

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table and narrative disclose compensation earned in 2021 by the NEOs. The table shows amounts earned by such persons for all services rendered in all capacities to KCS and its subsidiaries during the past year.
Name and Principal Position  Year   
Salary

($)
   
Bonus

($)
   
Stock

Awards

($)(1)
   
Option

Awards

($)(2)
   
Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)
   
All Other

Compensation

($)(3)
   
Total

($)
 
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
2021
2020
2019
 
 
 
  $
$
$
1,051,250
983,333
971,691
 
 
 
  $
$
$
530,000
0
0
 
 
 
  $
$
$
3,859,541
3,566,267
2,733,648
 
 
 
  $
$
$
1,199,999
1,086,895
850,501
 
 
 
  $
$
$
1,324,628
1,376,677
1,752,931
 
 
 
  $
$
$
202,765
122,740
71,641
 
 
 
  $
$
$
8,168,183
7,135,912
6,380,412
 
 
 
Michael W. Upchurch
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
2021
2020
2019
 
 
 
  $
$
$
536,250
509,428
501,641
 
 
 
  $
$
$
420,500
0
0
 
 
 
  $
$
$
977,182
859,644
631,971
 
 
 
  $
$
$
297,753
253,253
190,014
 
 
 
  $
$
$
447,747
446,108
575,884
 
 
 
  $
$
$
61,300
62,492
61,602
 
 
 
  $
$
$
2,740,732
2,130,925
1,961,112
 
 
 
Jeffrey M. Songer
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
   
2021
2020
2019
 
 
 
  $
$
$
534,000
510,076
505,159
 
 
 
  $
$
$
269,000
0
0
 
 
 
  $
$
$
1,343,652
860,503
625,818
 
 
 
  $
$
$
253,228
253,253
187,494
 
 
 
  $
$
$
464,633
446,666
579,922
 
 
 
  $
$
$
54,817
62,197
63,791
 
 
 
  $
$
$
2,919,330
2,132,695
1,962,184
 
 
 
Michael J. Naatz
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
   
2021
2020
2019
 
 
 
  $
$
$
505,250
469,337
424,960
 
 
 
  $
$
$
254,500
0
0
 
 
 
  $
$
$
793,736
798,462
577,044
 
 
 
  $
$
$
239,777
239,732
181,236
 
 
 
  $
$
$
396,116
411,188
487,854
 
 
 
  $
$
$
50,854
48,165
54,216
 
 
 
  $
$
$
2,240,233
1,966,884
1,725,310
 
 
 
Adam J. Godderz
Senior Vice President Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary (4)
   2021   $482,500   $375,000   $537,038   $160,008   $346,396   $204,870   $2,105,812 
Brian D. Hancock
Executive Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer (5)
   
2021
2020
2019
 
 
 
  $
$
$
254,606
478,367
460,800
 
 
 
  $
$
$
0
0
0
 
 
 
  $
$
$
795,847
808,086
597,590
 
 
 
  $
$
$
239,776
239,732
181,236
 
 
 
  $
$
$
0
418,963
528,998
 
 
 
  $
$
$
2,077,549
60,277
66,380
 
 
 
  $
$
$
3,367,778
2,005,425
1,835,004
 
 
 
(1)
This column presents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards made in 2021, 2020 or 2019, as applicable, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information, refer to Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the SEC. The amount for 2021 reflects (a) the grant date fair value for time vested stock awards under our Executive Plan and the 2021 LTI Program, and (b) the probable outcome at grant date for the performance share grant made pursuant to the 2021 LTI Program. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for more detail on these awards, the Executive Plan, the 2021 LTI Program, and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for the value of each grant. The value of the 2021 performance shares awards, assuming the highest level of performance achieved, would be, respectively, as follows: Mr. Ottensmeyer — $4,799,992; Mr. Upchurch — $1,191,026; Mr. Songer — $1,012,858; Mr. Naatz — $958,816; Mr. Godderz – $640,055 and Mr. Hancock — $958,816.
(2)
This column presents the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards made in 2021, 2020 or 2019, as applicable, computed in accordance with FASB ASC topic 718. For additional information, refer to Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the SEC.
28

(3)
“All Other Compensation” for the NEOs consists of:
Name
  
Year
   
KCS 401(K)

Plan Matching

Contributions
($)(a)
   
Group

Term Life

Insurance

Premiums

($)
   
AD&D

Premiums

($)
   
LTD

Premiums

($)
   
Matching

Charitable

Gifts

($)(b)
   
Financial

Planning

Reimbursement

($)
   
Other

($)(c)
   
Total

($)
 
Ottensmeyer
   2021   $14,500   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $15,000   $141,465   $202,765 
   2020   $14,250   $600   $150   $1,050   $25,000   $15,945   $65,745   $122,740 
   2019   $14,000   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $12,071   $13,770   $71,641 
Upchurch
   2021   $14,500   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $15,000   $0   $61,300 
   2020   $14,250   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $16,442   $0   $62,492 
   2019   $14,000   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $15,802   $0   $61,602 
Songer
   2021   $14,500   $600   $150   $1,050   $20,000   $15,000   $3,517   $54,817 
   2020   $14,250   $600   $150   $1,050   $25,000   $15,183   $5,964   $62,197 
   2019   $14,000   $600   $150   $1,050   $27,668   $15,288   $5,035   $63,791 
Naatz
   2021   $14,500   $600   $150   $1,050   $15,000   $15,000   $4,554   $50,854 
   2020   $14,250   $600   $150   $1,050   $15,000   $15,435   $1,680   $48,165 
   2019   $14,000   $600   $150   $1,050   $16,400   $15,698   $6,318   $54,216 
Godderz
   2021   $14,500   $600   $150   $1,050   $17,530   $15,000   $156,040   $204,870 
Hancock
   2021   $14,500   $300   $75   $525   $30,000   $7,438   $2,024,711   $2,077,549 
   2020   $14,250   $600   $150   $1,050   $24,000   $15,440   $4,787   $60,277 
   2019   $14,000   $600   $150   $1,050   $30,000   $15,288   $5,292   $66,380 
(a)
Subject to Internal Revenue Service rules, we match 100% of each employee’s elective 401(k) contributions, which do not exceed 5% of his or her compensation. For 2021, the maximum match was $14,500.
(b)
We provide a
two-for-one
Company match of eligible charitable contributions made by our NEOs. The maximum amount of contributions we will match in any calendar year for any NEO is $15,000. Of this $15,000, only half may be contributed to one organization.
(c)
Amounts in this column for 2021 include: Mr. Ottensmeyer — $138,935 for personal use of the Company’s aircraft (calculated as the incremental cost to the Company of such use) and $2,530 for an annual physical exam; Mr. Songer — $2,250 for an annual physical exam, $547 for a wellness reimbursement, and $720 for a cell phone allowance; Mr. Naatz — $4,500 for an annual physical exam and $54 for GKCCF administration fees; Mr. Godderz - $720 for a cell phone allowance, $155,277 for US Excise Tax Gross Up, and $43 for GKCCF administration fees; Mr. Hancock — $360 for a cell phone allowance, $2,000,000 for a severance payment and $24,330 for medical insurance premium payments, and $21 for GKCCF administration fees. Certain other perquisites are provided to our NEOs, but do not result in an aggregate incremental cost to the Company, and thus, no value for any of these perquisites is included in the Summary Compensation Table. Specifically, (1) all employees of the Company, including the NEOs, are given the opportunity to use our stadium and arena suites to the extent the suites are not being used for business purposes; (2) our NEOs may use the services of their administrative assistants for limited personal matters; and (3) spouses of certain of our NEOs accompanied them on private aircraft chartered to transport the NEOs for business purposes.
(4)
Mr. Godderz was not a Named Executive Officer in 2019 or 2020.
(5)
Mr. Hancock retired from the Company on July 2, 2021.
29

Narrative to Summary Compensation
Employment and Severance Agreements
. Each of the NEOs are party to a severance agreement with the Company. Our Severance Agreements are meant to provide a reasonable and competitive level of financial transitional support to executives in connection with the termination of their employment.
In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement between the Company and CP, KCSR entered into an agreement (each, a “Letter Agreement”) with each of the NEOs (other than Mr. Hancock). The Letter Agreements revise certain terms of the existing severance agreements with these executives, including: (1) providing that the protection period for enhanced change in control severance (the “CIC Protection Period”) will run from the date that the merger occurs through the
two-year
anniversary of the Control Date; (2) clarifying that for purposes of determining such executive’s
pro-rata
bonus and target bonus component of cash severance, the “target award” will be the greater of the target award for the calendar year in which the executive’s employment is terminated and the target award for the calendar year in which the change in control occurs and (3) for Mr. Upchurch and Mr. Godderz, establishing the multiple applicable to the base salary and target bonus components of their severance during the CIC Protection Period at three times. In addition, in consideration of certain acknowledgements from the executives that the occurrence of the merger will not, in and of itself, constitute “Good Reason” under such executive’s severance agreements and that the
non-competition
period under the severance agreements for each of the executives (other than Mr. Songer) will be extended from one to two years, the Letter Agreements provide that in the event that such executive receives any payments or benefits that are subject to tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, the executive will receive a payment that puts the executive in the same
after-tax
position as though such tax did not apply.
More information about the severance benefits payable to our NEOs under our Severance Agreements is set forth under “Potential Payments Upon Termination, Change in Control or Corporate Transaction.”
Indemnification Agreements
. We have entered into indemnification agreements with our KCS officers and directors. Each of our NEOs is an officer of KCS. These agreements are intended to supplement our officer and director liability insurance and to provide the officers and directors with specific contractual assurance that the protection provided by our Bylaws will continue to be available regardless of, among other things, an amendment to the Bylaws or a change in management or control of KCS. The indemnification agreements provide for indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law and for the prompt advancement of expenses, including attorneys’ fees and all other costs and expenses incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding in which the director or officer was or is a party, is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved, or to which the director or officer was or is a party, is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved by reason of service in certain capacities. Under the indemnification agreements, if required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, an advancement of expenses incurred will be made upon delivery to us of an undertaking to repay all advanced amounts if it is ultimately determined by final adjudication that the officer or director is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses. The indemnification agreements allow directors and officers to seek court relief if indemnification or expense advances are not received within specified periods, and obligate us to reimburse them for their expenses in pursuing such relief in good faith.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information for each of the NEOs regarding 2021 grants of annual incentive awards, equity incentive plan awards, restricted shares, and stock options.
   
Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (1)
  
Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)
             
Name
 
Grant
Date
  
Date Action
Taken by
Compensation
Committee
  
Threshold
($)
  
Target

($)
  
Maximum

($)
  
Threshold
(#)
  
Target

(#)
  
Maximum

(#)
  
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#)
  
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)(5)
  
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Sh)
  
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards

($)
 
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
  N/A   N/A  $0  $1,204,207  $2,408,414        
  02/03/2021          1,229 (4)    $259,442 
  02/03/2021       0   11,369   22,738     $2,399,996 
  02/03/2021          5,685 (3)    $1,200,104 
  02/03/2021           20,429  $211.10  $1,199,999 
30

   
Estimated Future Payouts
Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (1)
  
Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)
             
Name
 
Grant
Date
  
Date Action
Taken by
Compensation
Committee
  
Threshold
($)
  
Target

($)
  
Maximum

($)
  
Threshold
(#)
  
Target

(#)
  
Maximum

(#)
  
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#)
  
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)(5)
  
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Sh)
  
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards

($)
 
Michael W. Upchurch
  N/A   N/A  $0  $399,774  $799,548        
  02/03/2021          398 (4)    $84,018 
  02/03/2021       0   2,821   5,642     $595,513 
  02/03/2021          1,410 (3)    $297,651 
  02/03/2021           5,069  $211.10  $297,753 
Jeffrey M. Songer
  N/A   N/A  $0  $422,394  $844,788        
  02/03/2021          398 (4)    $84,018 
  02/03/2021       0   2,399   4,798     $506,429 
  02/03/2021          3,568 (3)    $753,205 
  02/03/2021           4,311  $211.10  $253,228 
Michael J. Naatz
  N/A   N/A  $0  $353,675  $707,350        
  02/03/2021          353 (4)    $74,518 
  02/03/2021       0   2,271   4,542     $479,408 
  02/03/2021          1,136 (3)    $239,810 
  02/03/2021           4,082  $211.10  $239,777 
Adam J. Godderz
  N/A   N/A  $0  $309,283  $618,566        
  02/03/2021          270 (4)    $56,997 
  02/03/2021       0   1,516   3,032     $320,028 
  02/03/2021          758 (3)    $160,014 
  02/03/2021           2,724  $211.10  $160,008 
Brian D. Hancock
  N/A   N/A  $0  $0  $0        
  02/03/2021          363 (4)    $76,629 
  02/03/2021       0   2,271   4,542     $479,408 
  02/03/2021          1,136 (3)    $239,810 
  02/03/2021           4,082  $211.10  $239,777 
(1)
The amounts reflected in these columns represent the threshold, target and maximum amounts that could have been earned under our 2021 AIP. Actual amounts paid for 2021 performance are reflected in the
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)
The amounts reflected in these columns represent the threshold, target and maximum amounts that could be earned for the performance share awards made under our 2021 LTI Program. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details of the 2021 LTI Program, including the performance goals. The amounts in the grant date fair value column represent the probable outcome at grant date of the performance goals for the 2021 LTI Program.
(3)
This amount reflects restricted stock awards granted under the 2017 Plan pursuant to our 2021 LTI Program. The shares vest in full three years after the grant date. For participants that are retirement eligible, 1/3 of the shares become
non-forfeitable
in three annual installments beginning one year from the grant date; however, such shares remain subject to sale and transfer restrictions in accordance with the original vesting schedule. Mr. Ottensmeyer and Mr. Upchurch are retirement eligible. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote such shares and dividends declared on the Common Stock are accrued and paid to the participant upon the vesting or
non-forfeitability,
as applicable, of the restricted shares.
(4)
This amount reflects restricted stock awards granted under the 2017 Plan pursuant to our Executive Plan. The shares vest in full one year after the grant date. For participants that are retirement eligible, the shares become
non-forfeitable
immediately; however, such shares remain subject to sale and transfer restrictions in accordance with the original vesting schedule. Mr. Ottensmeyer and Mr. Upchurch are retirement eligible. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote such shares and dividends declared on the Common Stock are accrued and paid to the participant upon the vesting or
non-forfeitability,
as applicable, of the restricted shares.
(5)
The amounts in this column reflect
non-qualified
stock options granted under the 2017 Plan pursuant to our 2021 LTI Program. The options vest in equal 1/3 amounts on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.
31

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
The NEOs did not have any outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2021. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, all outstanding stock options were converted to cash awards and paid out immediately following the closing into Voting Trust. All restricted stock vested immediately prior to the closing into Voting Trust and all performance shares were converted to cash awards. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further details.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information for each of the NEOs regarding stock option exercises and vesting of stock awards during 2021.
   
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
   
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
   
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
  
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
   
Value Realized on
Vesting
($)(3)
 
Ottensmeyer
   
4,690
161,650
 
 
  $
$
1,101,704
28,455,431.46
(1) 
(2) 
  53,996   $12,000,240 
Upchurch
   
37,845
11,288
 
 
  $
$
7,559,089
1,396,024.14
(1) 
(2) 
  12,570   $2,787,307 
Songer
   27,768   $4,667,998.97(2)   22,811   $5,808,904 
Naatz
   20,010   $3,074,586.95(2)   9,240   $2,320,635 
Godderz
   
8,844
5,936
 
 
  $
$
1,725,180
726,923.58
(1) 
(2) 
  3,910   $1,038,968 
Hancock
   14,619   $2,182,889(1)   7,364   $1,570,142 
(1)
This value was realized from options that were exercised prior to the merger. The value realized on shares that were sold immediately upon exercise is the difference between the actual sales price and the exercise price of the option.
(2)
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each outstanding (vested and unvested) employee stock option was converted to cash and paid out immediately following the closing into Voting Trust. Options were cashed out at the difference between the Merger Consideration Value of $301.20 and the exercise price of the respective option.
(3)
The value realized is the fair market value of our Common Stock (the closing price on the NYSE) on the trading day prior to the vesting date. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, all unvested restricted share awards became vested immediately prior to the effective time of the merger and received the Merger Consideration paid to shareholders ($90.00 per share plus 2.884 shares of CP common stock per share).
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control
As described above in the “Narrative to Summary Compensation” section, each of our NEOs is a party to a severance agreement. Each agreement provides certain benefits in the event of the termination of the NEO’s employment without cause or after a change in control. The agreements do not provide for any benefits in the event of the termination of employment resulting from death, disability or retirement. We believe that providing certain severance protections in the event of a change in control play an important role in attracting and retaining key executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes the severance benefits are an appropriate and necessary component of each NEO’s compensation package.
32

As noted above, on September 15, 2021, KCSR entered into certain Letter Agreements with each NEO in connection with the Merger Agreement with CP. These Letter Agreements amended the terms of the severance agreements between the Company and each NEO. The effect of these revised severance agreements is set forth in the following section.
The severance benefits described below are required to be provided pursuant to the terms of severance agreements with our NEO. These agreements may only be amended with the consent of the NEO.
Severance Agreements
Our Severance Agreements provide for the following severance benefits if the applicable executive’s employment ceases due to an involuntary termination without Cause or voluntary termination for Good Reason (each, defined in our Severance Agreement, and each, a “Qualified Termination”). Each executive’s severance benefits are subject to the execution of an “Arbitration Agreement” and a “Release.” The severance benefits are also contingent on the executive complying with certain confidentiality,
non-disclosure,
and
non-competition
provisions. Under the
non-competition
provisions, the executive agrees not to compete with the business of the Company in any geographic area then served by the Company for a period of two years (one year in the case of Mr. Songer) following the termination of his or her employment. The executive also agrees, subject to certain limitations, to not divert business from the Company, solicit business from customers or prospective customers of the Company, or solicit any employee to leave the employ of the Company.
Benefit
General Severance
Change in Control Severance
Cash Severance
•  CEO: 2 x (base salary + target bonus)
•  Other NEOs: 1 x (base salary + target bonus)
•  CEO: 3 x (base salary + target bonus)
•  Messrs. Upchurch & Godderz: 3 x (base salary + target bonus)
(1)
•  Other NEOs: 2 x (base salary + target bonus)
(1)
Current-Year Bonus
•  Prorated, subject to actual financial performance
•  Prorated at target financial performance
Long-Term Incentives
•  Determined by equity award agreement
•  CEO & NEOs: All unvested equity awards (including awards converted to cash-based awards in connection with the merger) shall vest upon Qualified Termination
Welfare Benefit Continuation
•  COBRA (for 12 months), if elected, executive will only be required to pay the same share of the applicable premium for medical coverage that would apply if the executive were participating in the medical plan as an active employee.
•  COBRA (for 18 months), if elected, executive will only be required to pay the same share of the applicable premium for medical coverage that would apply if the executive were participating in the medical plan as an active employee.
Outplacement
•  One year – up to $25,000
•  One year – up to $25,000
(1)
Minimum of 60% target bonus used for select executives in the event of a CIC severance.
33

Other Compensatory Plans that Provide Benefits on Retirement or Termination of Employment
Described below are the portions of our compensation plans in which the accounts of NEOs become vested as a result of (a) their retirement, death, disability or termination of employment, (b) a change in control of us, or (c) a change in the NEO’s responsibilities following a change in control.
KCS 401(k) Plan.
Participants, including our NEOs, are fully vested in their accounts under the KCS 401(k) Plan, other than their matching contributions. Subject to certain exceptions, Company matching contributions vest as follows: 20% vesting after two years of service, 40% after three years of service, 60% after four years of service and 100% after five years of service. Vesting is accelerated in the case of retirement at age 65, death or disability or upon a change in control of us (as defined in the KCS 401(k) Plan). Distribution of benefits under the KCS 401(k) Plan will be made in connection with a participant’s death, disability, retirement or other termination of employment. Subject to certain restrictions, a participant may elect whether payment of his or her benefits will be in a lump sum or installments. Benefits are normally paid in cash. However, to the extent a participant’s accounts are invested in whole shares of our Common Stock, the participant may elect to receive distributions of benefits under the KCS 401(k) Plan in cash, whole shares of our Common Stock, or in a combination of cash and whole shares of our Common Stock.
2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan.
Beginning on May 4, 2017, all equity awards have been made under the 2017 Plan, which was adopted to replace the 2008 Plan. Outstanding equity awards made under the 2008 Plan continue to be governed under the terms and conditions of the 2008 Plan. However, the 2008 Plan has been permanently frozen and all awards made on or after May 4, 2017 have been made under the 2017 Plan. As described below in greater detail, the 2017 Plan terms and conditions governing the treatment of equity awards in the event of death, disability, retirement or on account of a change of control are substantially the same as those in the 2008 Plan. The tables below reflect awards under both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan and related award agreements.
Subject to the terms of the specific award agreements, under both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan, the termination of affiliation of a grantee of an award by reason of death, Disability, Retirement or on account of a Change of Control (as such terms are defined in the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan, as applicable) may accelerate the ability to exercise an award.
Death or Change of Control.
Upon the death, or upon the termination of affiliation on account of a Change of Control, of a grantee of an award under both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan, unless otherwise specified in the award agreement:
(i) the grantee’s restricted shares and restricted share units, if any, that were forfeitable will become nonforfeitable,
(ii) any options or stock appreciation right (“SAR”) not exercisable at that time will become nonforfeitable and exercisable and the grantee’s personal representative or other transferee upon death may exercise such options or SARs up to the earlier of the expiration of the option or SAR term, one year after the death of the grantee, or ten years from the grant date of the award,
(iii) the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has ended will become nonforfeitable, and the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has not ended will become nonforfeitable in the amount that would be earned for such performance period if the performance goals for such performance period were met at target, and
(iv) any shares subject to a deferred stock award will become nonforfeitable.
34

Disability or Retirement.
Upon the termination of affiliation by reason of Disability or Retirement of a grantee of an award under both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan, unless otherwise specified in the award agreement:
(i) the grantee’s restricted shares and restricted share units, if any, that were forfeitable will become nonforfeitable in a number determined by multiplying the total number of restricted shares and restricted share units by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of twelve-month periods of employment commencing on the grant date that have been completed by the grantee, and the denominator of which is the total number of twelve-month periods in the period of restriction,
(ii) any options or SARs not exercisable at that time will become nonforfeitable and exercisable and the grantee or the grantee’s legal representative (or the grantee’s transferee upon the death of the grantee) may exercise such options or SARs as follows: (a) if the termination of affiliation was by reason of Retirement, up to the expiration of the option or SAR term (except that for options or SARs granted prior to February 18, 2015 under the 2008 Plan, which can be exercised up to the earliest of the expiration of the option or SAR term, five years following the grantee’s termination of affiliation by reason of Retirement, or ten years from the grant date of the award) or (b) if termination of affiliation was by reason of Disability, up to the earliest of the option or SAR term, one year following the grantee’s termination of affiliation by reason of Disability, or 10 years from the grant date of the award.
(iii) the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has ended will become nonforfeitable, and the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has not ended will be forfeited, and
(iv) any shares subject to a deferred stock award will become nonforfeitable.
Other Termination of Affiliation.
Upon the termination of affiliation of a grantee of an award under both the 2017 Plan and the 2008 Plan for any reason other than death, Disability, Retirement, or on account of a Change of Control, then, unless otherwise specified in the award agreement:
(i) the grantee’s restricted shares and restricted share units, if any, that were forfeitable on the date of the grantee’s termination of affiliation, are forfeited on that date;
(ii) any options or SARs not exercisable at that time will be forfeited, and any options or SARs that are vested and exercisable or become exercisable at that time may be exercised by the grantee up to the earlier of the expiration of the option or SAR term, three months following the grantee’s termination of affiliation, or ten years from the grant date of the award; provided, however, that if termination of affiliation is for Cause (as defined in the 2008 Plan), then any unexercised options or SARs will be forfeited;
(iii) the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has ended but which are not vested will be forfeited, and the benefits payable with respect to any performance share or performance unit for which the performance period has not ended will be forfeited; and
(iv) any unvested shares subject to a deferred stock award will be forfeited.
Certain Award Agreements under the 2017 and the 2008 Plan.
Certain award agreements provide for alternate termination provisions than those provided for in the 2017 and the 2008 Plan, respectively.
Restricted Shares Award Agreements for newly hired or promoted executives provide that if there is a termination of affiliation by reason of retirement prior to vesting, then for every consecutive twelve-month period of employment completed during the period beginning on the grant date and ending on the date of termination of affiliation by reason of retirement, 1/5 of the number of restricted shares will vest and no longer be subject to restriction.
Restricted Shares and Performance Shares Award Agreements for the 2019 LTI Program, 2020 LTI Program, and 2021 LTI Program provide that the restricted shares will vest and no longer be subject to
35

restrictions upon a termination of affiliation by reason of a disability prior to vesting. Additionally, for the performance shares, if there is a termination of affiliation due to a disability prior to vesting, then upon such termination of affiliation the executive will be deemed to have earned a number of shares determined as if the Performance Goals were at target. Also, for the performance shares, if there is a termination of affiliation prior to vesting due to retirement, a portion of the performance shares will be forfeited where the forfeited portion shall equal the number of performance shares times a fraction, the numerator of which is the total number of remaining whole months in the performance period and the denominator of which is
thirty-six
months. The portion of performance shares not forfeited pursuant to the foregoing shall be earned based on the applicable performance percentage achieved and shall be paid on the later of the vesting date or the date the results are certified. 
Restricted Shares Award Agreements used for our Executive Plan provide that restricted shares will no longer be subject to restrictions upon a termination of affiliation due to retirement prior to vesting.
Restricted Shares and Stock Option Award Agreements generally provide that all awards become fully vested or exercisable upon a Change of Control. Beginning in March 2019, awards, pursuant to our annual LTI Program, provide that such vesting will only occur upon a termination of employment within two years after a Change of Control.
Beginning in February 2021, all employee equity award agreements generally provide that awards become fully vested or exercisable upon an involuntary termination of employment or a voluntary termination for Good Reason (as defined in respective award agreement), in each case within a
two-year
period following a Change of Control.
Trusts Securing the Rights of the Officers, Directors, Employees and Former Employees
We have established a series of grantor trusts (commonly referred to as “rabbi” trusts) that are intended to secure the rights of our officers, directors, employees, former employees and others (each a “Beneficiary”) under various contracts, benefit plans, agreements, arrangements and commitments. The function of each trust is to receive contributions from us and, following a change in control of the Company (as defined by the trust), if we fail to honor certain obligations to a Beneficiary, the trust shall distribute to the Beneficiary amounts accumulated in such Beneficiary’s trust account, or in the general trust account, to discharge such obligations as they become due, to the extent of available trust assets. The trusts require that we be solvent as a condition to making distributions. Trusts have been established with respect to the employment continuation commitments under employment agreements, the Executive Plan, the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, indemnification agreements and the 2008 Plan, among others. New trusts were executed on February 24, 2011. The new trusts are revocable by the Board of Directors until a change in control of the Company. KCSR has established similar trusts tied to any failure by KCSR to honor its obligations to beneficiaries following a change in control of KCSR.
Tables Summarizing Payments Upon Employment Termination
The following tables summarize the estimated payments that would be made under each contract, agreement, plan or arrangement which provides for payments to a NEO at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment, including by resignation, retirement, disability, or dismissal or resignation for good reason following a change in control. None of our NEOs are eligible to receive payments upon a voluntary resignation or a termination for cause (as defined above). In accordance with SEC regulations, we do not report any amount to be provided under any arrangement which does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of our NEOs and which is available generally to all salaried employees in the United States. The following tables do not repeat information provided in the Summary Compensation Table or the Outstanding Equity Awards at
Year-End
Table, except to the extent the amount payable would be enhanced by the termination event.
For purposes of the quantitative disclosure in the following tables, and in accordance with SEC regulations, we have assumed that the termination took place on December 31, 2021 and do not reflect the impact of any common approaches to mitigating potential tax exposure under Section 4999 of the Code, such as ascribing value to post-closing
non-competition
covenants.
36

   
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
 
Benefit
  
Death
   
Disability
   
Retirement
   
Change in
Control
   
Without Cause
or Good Reason
 
Cash Severance
  $—     $—     $—     $6,792,621   $4,528,414 
Retention Bonus
  $—     $—     $—     $1,590,000   $—   
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
  $—     $—     $—       
Unvested Restricted Stock
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Unvested Performance Shares
  $23,771,909   $23,771,909   $16,666,400   $23,771,909   $—   
Unexercisable Options
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $23,771,909   $23,771,909   $16,666,400   $23,771,909   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other Benefits
          
Outplacement Benefits
  $—     $—     $—     $25,000   $25,000 
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
  $—     $—     $—     $8,072   $5,381 
Estimated Make Whole Payment
  $—     $—     $—     $9,884,670   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $—     $—     $—     $9,917,742   $30,381 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $23,771,909   $23,771,909   $16,666,400   $42,072,272   $4,558,795 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
Michael W. Upchurch
 
Benefit
  
Death
   
Disability
   
Retirement
   
Change in
Control
   
Without Cause
or Good Reason
 
Cash Severance
  $—     $—     $—     $2,822,322   $940,774 
Retention Bonus
  $—     $—     $—     $811,500   $—   
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
  $—     $—     $—       
Unvested Restricted Stock
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Unvested Performance Shares
  $5,552,923   $5,552,923   $3,828,252   $5,552,923   $—   
Unexercisable Options
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $5,552,923   $5,552,923   $3,828,252   $5,552,923   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other Benefits
          
Outplacement Benefits
  $—     $—     $—     $25,000   $25,000 
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
  $—     $—     $—     $16,115   $10,743 
Estimated Make Whole Payment
  $—     $—     $—     $3,080,020   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $—     $—     $—     $3,121,135   $35,743 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $  5,552,923   $  5,552,923   $  3,828,252   $12,307,880   $   976,517 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
Jeffrey M. Songer
 
Benefit
  
Death
   
Disability
   
Retirement
   
Change in
Control
   
Without Cause
or Good Reason
 
Cash Severance
  $—     $—     $—     $1,920,788   $960,394 
Retention Bonus
  $—     $—     $—     $807,000   $—   
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
  $—     $—     $—       
Unvested Restricted Stock
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Unvested Performance Shares
  $5,271,602   $5,271,602   $—     $5,271,602   $—   
Unexercisable Options
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $5,271,602   $5,271,602   $—     $5,271,602   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other Benefits
      $—       
Outplacement Benefits
  $—     $—     $—     $25,000   $25,000 
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
  $—     $—     $—     $25,028   $16,685 
Estimated Make Whole Payment
  $—     $—     $—     $2,677,757   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $—     $—     $—     $2,727,785   $41,685 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
      $—       
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $  5,271,602   $  5,271,602   $            —     $10,727,175   $1,002,079 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
37

   
Michael J. Naatz
 
Benefit
  
Death
   
Disability
   
Retirement
   
Change in
Control
   
Without Cause
or Good Reason
 
Cash Severance
  $—     $—     $—     $1,725,350   $862,675 
Retention Bonus
  $—     $—     $—     $763,500   $—   
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
  $—     $—     $—       
Unvested Restricted Stock
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Unvested Performance Shares
  $5,031,847   $5,031,847   $—     $5,031,847   $—   
Unexercisable Options
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $5,031,847   $5,031,847   $—     $5,031,847   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other Benefits
      $—       
Outplacement Benefits
  $—     $—     $—     $25,000   $25,000 
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
  $—     $—     $—     $24,978   $16,652 
Estimated Make Whole Payment
  $—     $—     $—     $2,498,114   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $—     $—     $—     $2,548,092   $41,652 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $  5,031,847   $  5,031,847   $            —     $10,068,789   $   904,327 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
Adam J. Godderz
 
Benefit
  
Death
   
Disability
   
Retirement
   
Change in
Control
   
Without Cause
or Good Reason
 
Cash Severance
  $—     $—     $—     $2,397,849   $799,283 
Retention Bonus
  $—     $—     $—     $735,000   $—   
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
  $—     $—     $—       $—   
Unvested Restricted Stock
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Unvested Performance Shares
  $2,873,448   $2,873,448   $—     $2,873,448   $—   
Unexercisable Options
  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $2,873,448   $2,873,448   $—     $2,873,448   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other Benefits
      $—       
Outplacement Benefits
  $—     $—     $—     $25,000   $25,000 
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
  $—     $—     $—     $25,028   $16,685 
Estimated Make Whole Payment
  $—     $—     $—     $2,649,758   $—   
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $—     $—     $—     $2,699,786   $41,685 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $  2,873,448   $  2,873,448   $            —     $  8,706,083   $   840,968 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Brian D. Hancock*
Benefit
Death
Disability
Retirement
Change in

Control
Without Cause
or Good Reason
Cash Severance
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Retention Bonus
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Equity (Intrinsic Value)
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Unvested Restricted Stock
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Unvested Performance Shares
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Unexercisable Options
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Total
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Other Benefits
Outplacement Benefits
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Health & Welfare (Present Value)
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Estimated Make Whole Payment
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Total
$—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Total
$            —  $            —  $            —  $            —  $            —  
*
Mr. Hancock retired from the Company on July 2, 2021. Amounts paid to him upon his retirement are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
38

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, and the annual total compensation of our employees. This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in good faith, in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation
S-K,
based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The Securities and Exchange Commission rules for identifying the “median employee” and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratios reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio set forth below, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
For the year ended December 31, 2021:
The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company (other than our CEO) was $49,462 (based on the exchange rate reported by Banco de Mexico on December 31, 2021 of 20.5835 Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar). The employee is a collective bargaining employee based in Mexico.
The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A,
was $8,314,898.
Based on this information, for 2021 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 168 to 1.
To facilitate analysis and benchmarking with other U.S. Class I railroads, we are also providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our CEO and the annual total compensation of employees who are located in the U.S. (“U.S. Employees”). The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation
S-K,
except for the inclusion of only U.S. Employees.
For the year ended December 31, 2021:
The median of the annual total compensation of U.S. Employees of the Company (other than our CEO) was $97,495. This employee is a collective bargaining employee based in Louisiana.
The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A,
was $8,314,898.
Based on this information, for 2021 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of U.S. Employees was 85 to 1.
Following is the methodology and material assumptions we applied to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees and the median of the annual total compensation of U.S. Employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the respective “median employee”:
We selected October 31, 2021 as the date upon which to identify the respective median employee. No significant changes to the respective employee populations have occurred subsequent to October 31, 2021.
As of October 31, 2021, our employee population consisted of approximately 7,000 full-time employees, with approximately 2,950 of these individuals located in the U.S. and approximately 4,050 located in Mexico. Approximately 71% of our employees located in the U.S. are covered by collective bargaining agreements and approximately 77% of our employees located in Mexico are covered by a labor agreement with the Mexican railroad union (Sindicato de Trabajadores Ferrocarrileros de la República Mexicana).
39

Workers not employed by the Company were excluded from the determination of the respective “median employee”, as such workers are employed by unaffiliated third parties, and their compensation is determined by those unaffiliated third parties.
To identify the respective “median employee” from the total employee population and from the U.S. Employee population, we compared, for the twelve months ended October 31, 2021, the aggregate amount of:
Salary or wages, as applicable;
Annual cash incentive payments;
Payments required by Mexican labor law or consistent with Mexican customary practice, including Christmas bonus, vacation premium, food stipends and statutory profit sharing;
The Company’s 401(k) or Mexican savings fund matching contributions.
The Company believes the resulting compensation measure is the most comparable measure between the U.S. and Mexico employee populations.
In making the above determination for the total employee population, amounts paid in Mexican pesos were converted to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of 20.3255 Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar, the exchange rate reported by Banco de Mexico on October 31, 2021.
In making the above determinations for the total employee population and for the U.S. Employee population, we annualized the compensation of approximately 481 and 307 full-time employees, respectively, who did not work for us for the entire twelve-month period due to being hired or taking unpaid leaves of absence during the period.
We identified our respective median employees using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all employees included in the respective calculation.
We did not make any
cost-of-living
adjustment in identifying the respective median employees.
For each of the median employees, we combined all elements of the respective employee’s compensation for 2021 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation
S-K
and consistent with the determination of the total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
This section describes the compensation paid to our directors. Only directors who are not members of management receive compensation for service as a director. Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, our President and CEO, serves on our Board, but is not paid any compensation for his service on the Board. His compensation as an executive is described in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A.
Director Fees
Director Compensation Practices
The Compensation Committee recommends each component of director compensation to the Board. Based upon advice from its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee seeks to recommend compensation packages, including both cash and stock components, that are competitive with the Company’s peer group. The Board does not delegate its authority for determining director compensation to any other person.
In recommending director compensation, the Compensation Committee may consider, and determine the weight it will give to, any combination of the following:
market competition for directors;
40

securities law and NYSE independence, expertise and qualification requirements;
director compensation provided by peer group companies selected by the Compensation Committee with the assistance of the Compensation Consultant;
directors’ duties and responsibilities; and
director retention.
In 2021, no changes were made to annual director pay levels. The Compensation Committee believes its current compensation levels are, on average, aligned with its stated goal of compensating our directors at the 50th percentile of directors of companies in our peer group. The Compensation Committee will periodically review director compensation to maintain this alignment.
Director Compensation Program
Under our director compensation program each
non-management
director receives the following compensation for his or her service as a member of the Board:
Annual Cash Retainers for Board and Committee Membership
Type
  
Amount
 
Board of Directors
  $75,000 
Chair of the Board
  $100,000 
Committee Chair
  $20,000 
Committee Membership
  $10,000 
In addition, directors received special fees in the amount of $40,000 for merger related compensation
.
Director Stock Awards
Under the director compensation program, each
non-management
director is awarded a grant of Common Stock under the 2017 Plan on the date of each annual meeting or on the date of their election to the Board, which vests immediately. The grant is for a number of shares equal to approximately $125,000 in value. Due to the merger agreement in effect at the time with CN, cash in the amount of $125,000 was paid in lieu of the annual director stock award.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for directors that require each director to beneficially own shares of our Common Stock with a fair market value equal to at least five times the base annual cash retainer for serving as a Board member (currently 5 x $75,000 = $375,000). Deferred shares granted to directors count toward this requirement. Directors must achieve this ownership level within five years from the date of their election to the Board. All of the directors who have been on the Board for at least five years met this stock ownership requirement until the effective time of the merger. Upon closing into the Voting Trust, these stock ownership guidelines were eliminated.
Director Expense Reimbursement
In addition to compensating the directors as discussed above, we also reimburse the directors for their expenses in attending Board and Committee meetings.
Directors’ Fee Deferral Plans
Directors are permitted to defer receipt of directors’ cash fees and retainers under an unfunded Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan (which we refer to as the “Deferred Fee Plan”) adopted by the Board. Earnings on deferred fees and earnings credited to the director’s account are determined by the hypothetical “investment” of deferred fees based on the director’s election among investment options designated by us from time to time for the Deferred Fee Plan. An underlying investment rate determined from time to time by the Board (currently the rate on United States
41

Treasury securities with a maturity of 10 years plus one percentage point, adjusted annually on July 1) is used to credit with interest any part of a director’s account for which a mutual fund has not been designated as the hypothetical “investment.” A director’s account value will be paid after the director ceases to be a director of KCS. Amounts deferred, including related earnings, will be paid either in installments or a lump sum, as elected by the director. Distributions under the Deferred Fee Plan are allowed prior to cessation as a director in certain instances as approved by the Board. The Board may designate a plan administrator, but in the absence of such designation, the Corporate Secretary of KCS will administer the Deferred Fee Plan.
In 2011, the Board adopted the Director Deferred Stock Program (the “Deferred Stock Program”). Under the Deferred Stock Program, cash retainers paid each year may be deferred into shares of KCS common stock. Directors may defer a percentage or a specific dollar amount into KCS common stock. The number of shares granted under the Deferred Stock Program will be equal to (a) the aggregate value of annual cash retainers elected to be deferred, divided by (b) the fair market value per share on the grant date. The stock is 100% vested, but has no voting rights. Dividend equivalents (if any) will also be credited to the KCS deferred stock account. Dividend equivalents are credited to the director’s deferred stock account as of the date the Company pays any dividend (whether in cash or in kind) on its Common Stock in an amount equal to the ratio of (A) the aggregate value of the dividend that would have been payable on the deferred stock held by the Director immediately prior to such payment date had the shares represented by such deferred stock been outstanding as of such payment date to (B) the fair market value per share as of such date. Directors may elect the date that distribution of the deferred shares occurs. They may also choose to receive payment in either lump sum or installments (up to 5 years). Payment will be accelerated in the event of a change in control of KCS or the director’s death. Messrs. Druten and
Garza-Santos
participated in the Deferred Stock Program during 2021. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, outstanding deferred shares were paid immediately prior to the effective time of the merger and the participant received the Merger Consideration that was paid to shareholders ($90.00 per share plus 2.884 shares of CP common stock per share). Upon closing into Voting Trust, the Deferred Stock Program was eliminated.
2021 Director Compensation
The following table shows the compensation paid to our
non-employee
directors in 2021.
Name
  
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
   
Option
Awards
($)(1)
   
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
   
Total
($)
 
Lydia I. Beebe
  $260,000  $0   $0   $30,049   $290,049 
Lu M. Córdova
  $270,000  $0   $0   $17,049   $287,049 
Robert J. Druten
  $380,000(2)  $0   $0   $27,430   $407,430 
Antonio O. Garza, Jr.
  $260,000  $0   $0   $50,075   $310,075 
David
Garza-Santos
  $250,000(3)  $0   $0   $75   $250,075 
Janet H. Kennedy
  $250,000  $0   $0   $10,075   $260,075 
Mitchell J. Krebs
  $260,000  $0   $0   $8,075   $268,075 
Henry J. Maier
  $270,000  $0   $0   $49   $270,049 
Thomas A. McDonnell
  $280,000  $0   $0   $30,030   $310,030 
(1)
No stock or option awards were granted to any director in 2021.
(2)
Mr. Druten deferred receipt of $240,000 pursuant to the Directors Deferred Stock Program. He accrued 817 deferred shares as a result of this deferral and receives dividend equivalents on such deferred shares. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, outstanding deferred shares were paid out to the participant immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. In exchange for the deferred shares that were paid out, the participant received the Merger Consideration that was paid to all stockholders ($90.00 per share plus 2.884 shares of CP common stock per share).
(3)
Mr. Garza-Santos
deferred receipt of $110,000 pursuant to the Directors Deferred Stock Program. He accrued 374 deferred shares as a result of this deferral and receives dividend equivalents on such deferred shares. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, outstanding deferred shares were paid out to the participant immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. In exchange for the deferred shares that were paid out, the participant received the Merger Consideration that was paid to all stockholders ($90.00 per share plus 2.884 shares of CP common stock per share).
42

(4)
All Other Compensation for directors consists of:
Name
  
Group Term
Life Premiums
   
AD&D
Premiums
   
Charitable
Matching Gifts (a)
   
Other(b)
   
Total
 
Lydia I. Beebe
  $39   $10   $30,000   $0   $30,049 
Lu M. Córdova
  $39   $10   $17,000   $0   $17,049 
Robert J. Druten
  $24   $6   $27,400   $0   $27,430 
Antonio O. Garza, Jr.
  $60   $15   $14,000   $36,000   $50,075 
David
Garza-Santos
  $60   $15   $0   $0   $75 
Janet H. Kennedy
  $60   $15   $10,000   $0   $10,075 
Mitchell J. Krebs
  $60   $15   $8,000   $0   $8,075 
Henry J. Maier
  $39   $10   $0   $0   $49 
Thomas A. McDonnell
  $24   $6   $30,000   $0   $30,030 
(a)
We provide a
two-for-one
Company match of eligible charitable contributions made by our directors. The maximum amount of contributions we will match in any calendar year for any director is $15,000. Of this $15,000 maximum, only half may be contributed to one organization.
(b)
Amounts in this column for 2021 include: Mr. Garza – director fees paid by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Kansas City Southern de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., for serving as Chairman of its board of directors.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
The following table contains information concerning the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of April 4, 2022 by:
Beneficial owners of more than five percent of our Common Stock that have publicly disclosed their ownership in filings with the SEC;
The members of our Board of Directors, including our Chief Executive Officer;
Our Chief Financial Officer and the other executive officers for whom information is provided in the Summary Compensation Table in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A;
and
All current executive officers and directors as a group. The address for each of our directors and executive officers listed is 427 West 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105.
No officer or director of KCS owns any equity securities of any subsidiary of KCS. Beneficial ownership is generally defined as either the sole or shared power to vote or dispose of the shares. Except as otherwise noted, the beneficial owners have sole power to vote and dispose of the Common Stock.
43

Beneficial Ownership Table
Name of Beneficial Owner
  
Common Stock (1)
   
Percent of Class (1)
 
5% or Greater Owners
    
CP VOTING TRUST(2)
   100    100
Named Executive Officers and Directors
    
Lydia I. Beebe
   —      —   
Lu M. Córdova
   —      —   
Robert J. Druten
   —      —   
Antonio O. Garza, Jr.
   —      —   
David
Garza-Santos
   —      —   
Janet H. Kennedy
   —      —   
Mitchell J. Krebs
   —      —   
Henry J. Maier
   —      —   
Thomas A. McDonnell
   —      —   
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
   —      —   
Brian D. Hancock
   —      —   
Michael J. Naatz
   —      —   
Jeffrey M. Songer
   —      —   
Michael W. Upchurch
    
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)
   —      —   
(1)
This column includes Common Stock beneficially owned by officers, directors, nominees for director and beneficial owners of more than five percent of our Common Stock. The list of our executive officers is included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(2)
David L. Starling, 2442 NE Rivercrest Rd., Fayetteville, AR 72701, is the Trustee of a Voting Trust established December 14, 2021, by and between CP, Cygnus Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CP, and David L. Starling. Upon the execution of the Voting Trust Agreement and completion of the merger transactions contemplated under the Merger Agreement, the Company was ultimately merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of CP. Immediately upon completion of these transactions, the surviving subsidiary from these mergers changed its name to Kansas City Southern (KCS), and the certificate for all outstanding common shares of the Company was deposited with the Trustee to hold in trust.
The Voting Trust Agreement between CP and Mr. Starling in his role as the trustee of the Voting Trust requires the trustee to vote all trust stock in favor of any proposal or action necessary or desirable to effect, or consistent with the effectuation of, the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and, until the STB has issued a final order approving the transaction and common control of KCS by CP, against any proposed merger, business combination or similar transaction involving KCS but not involving CP or one of its affiliates. On other matters (including the election or removal of directors), the trustee generally will vote the trust stock in the trustee’s sole discretion, unless CP, with the prior written approval of the STB, directs the trustee as to any such vote with respect to the trust stock represented by such trust certificate. Under the Voting Trust Agreement, the trustee is generally prohibited from exercising the voting powers of the trust stock in any way that would create any dependence or intercorporate relationship between (i) CP, on the one hand, and (ii) KCS or its affiliates, on the other hand, and is also prohibited from selling, leasing, assigning, transferring, alienating, pledging, encumbering or hypothecating the trust stock and/or any major assets of KCS.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
At December 31, 2021, there were no securities authorized for issuance under any compensation plans of Kansas City Southern. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, all compensation plans under which equity securities were authorized for issuance have been terminated.
44

Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board of Directors is empowered to review, approve and ratify any related party transaction as defined by Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
The charter of the Nominating Committee contains procedures for the review of related person transactions and the reporting of such transactions by the Nominating Committee to the full Board of Directors for approval or ratification. These transactions, which include any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, are reviewed for approval or ratification for any transaction in which the Company is a participant and the Company’s directors, director nominees, executive officers, greater than five percent beneficial owners and their respective immediate family members have a direct or indirect material interest, where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $120,000. The Nominating Committee has directed the Corporate Secretary to review on behalf of the Nominating Committee responses to annual director and officer questionnaires to determine whether any related person has, or has had, a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction with the Company or its subsidiaries, other than the receipt of ordinary director or officer compensation in the last fiscal year. The charter of the Audit Committee contains procedures designed to ensure that any related person transactions that are ratified or approved by the Nominating Committee are properly reported by the Company in its financial statements and SEC filings.
The policy outlined in the Nominating Committee Charter provides that the Nominating Committee reviews certain transactions subject to the policy and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the Nominating Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate:
the significance of the transaction to the Company;
the best interests of the Company’s stockholders;
the materiality of the transaction to the related person;
whether the transaction is significantly likely to impair any judgments an executive officer or director would make on behalf of the Company;
the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics;
whether a related person serves on the Compensation Committee and if so, whether such continued service is appropriate in accordance with the Compensation Committee charter; and
whether the terms of the transaction are more favorable to the Company than would be available from an unrelated third party.
There were no related party transactions in 2021.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Company (the “Guidelines”) require that a majority of the Board of Directors must be independent, as determined affirmatively by the Board in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE, although our goal is to have
two-thirds
of the members of the Board meet these requirements. We refer to directors who meet the NYSE independence standards as “Independent Directors”. All of our directors (other than Mr. Ottensmeyer, our Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer) are Independent Directors. Our Board has affirmatively determined that each Independent Director has no material relationship with the Company and is independent in accordance with applicable NYSE listing standards. These standards assist the Board in determining that a director or nominee has no material relationship with KCS, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with KCS. The Board holds regular executive sessions of the Independent Directors. All Board committees, other than the Executive Committee, are comprised of only Independent Directors. Thus, the Independent Directors directly oversee critical matters such as the compensation of executive management, the selection and evaluation of Board nominees, the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and the development of corporate governance programs of the Company.
45

Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES
The following table presents the total fees for professional audit and other services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively (in thousands).
   
Year Ended

December 31
 
Fees
  
2021
   
2020
 
Audit fees(1)
  $2,491.4   $1,779.8 
Audit-related fees(2)
   64.0    63.0 
Tax fees(3)
   36.5    29.5 
All other fees
   160.0    —   
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $2,751.9   $1,872.3 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
(1)
Audit fees principally include fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
and internal control over financial reporting (integrated audit); the review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form
10-Q;
the audit for statutory purposes of the consolidated financial statements of KCSM, our wholly-owned subsidiary; and services routinely provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2)
Audit-related fees consist of fees for other attestation and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.
(3)
Tax fees consist of tax compliance services.
PRE-APPROVAL
POLICY
The Audit Committee’s
pre-approval
policies and procedures, as described in its charter, provide that the Audit Committee will approve all services and fees for audit and
non-audit
services prior to engagement. The Chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to
pre-approve
any audit and
non-audit
services on behalf of the Audit Committee, provided that such decisions are provided to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee
pre-approved
all services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers for 2021.
46

Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) List of Documents filed as part of this Report
(1) Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, appear in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
(3) List of Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
The Company has attached or incorporated by reference herein certain exhibits as specified below pursuant to
Rule 12b-32 under the Exchange Act.


Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Part IV (Item 15) of the 2021 Form
10-K
is hereby amended solely to add the following exhibits required to be filed in connection with this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A.
(b) Exhibits
Exhibits are listed in the exhibit index below.
Exhibit
Description
2.1
31.13.1
3.2
4.1As permitted by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Company has not filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and its subsidiaries because the total amount of securities authorized under any of such instruments does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreements to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2

88

ExhibitDescription
4.2.3
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.5
4.5.1
4.5.2
4.5.3
4.5.4
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2

89

ExhibitDescription
4.6.3
4.6.4
4.6.5
4.6.6
4.6.7
4.6.8
4.6.9
4.6.10
4.6.11
4.6.12
4.6.13
4.6.14
4.6.15
10.1
10.2
10.3*
10.4*

90

ExhibitDescription
10.5*
10.5.1*
10.6*
10.7
10.7.1
10.7.2
10.7.3
10.7.4
10.7.5
10.7.6
10.8
10.8.1
10.8.2
10.8.3

91

ExhibitDescription
10.8.4
10.8.5
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.11.1
10.12
10.12.1
10.12.2
10.12.3
10.13
10.13.1
10.13.2

92

ExhibitDescription
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.17.1*
10.17.2*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
21.1
22.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
10432.1
Cover Page
32.2
101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File (embeddedbecause its XBRL
tags are embedded
within the Inline XBRL document)document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
.
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

93


ExhibitDescription
104The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022,
formatted in Inline XBRL (included within the Exhibit 101 attachments).
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
†† Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which were subsequently approved.

94

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Kansas City Southern
By:
/S/    PATRICK J. OTTENSMEYER        
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
February 3, 2023
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know all people by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Patrick J. Ottensmeyer and Michael W. Upchurch, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated on February 3, 2023.
SignatureTitle
/S/    PATRICK J. OTTENSMEYER   
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer).
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
/S/    MICHAEL W. UPCHURCH
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer).
Michael W. Upchurch
/s/ SUZANNE M. GRAFTON
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer).
Suzanne M. Grafton
/S/    ROBERT J. DRUTEN
Chairman of the Board and Director.
Robert J. Druten
/s/ LYDIA I. BEEBE
Director.
Lydia I. Beebe
/S/    LU M. CÓRDOVA
Director.
Lu M. Córdova

95

Kansas City SouthernSignatureTitle
By:
/S/    ANTONIO O. GARZA, JR.
/S/    PATRICK J. OTTENSMEYER        
Director.
Antonio O. Garza, Jr.
/S/    DAVID GARZA-SANTOS
Director.
David Garza-Santos
Patrick /S/    JANET H. KENNEDY
Director.
Janet H. Kennedy
/s/ MITCHELL J. OttensmeyerKREBS
Director.
Mitchell J. Krebs
/s/ HENRY J. MAIER
Director.
Henry J. Maier
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director/S/    THOMAS A. MCDONNELL
Director.
Thomas A. McDonnell

April 4, 2022

4796