UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 210-K

 

(Mark One)

(Mark One)
 
[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

 

OR

OR
[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                          to

 

Commission File No. 1-13906

 

Ballantyne Strong, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware 47-0587703

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 300

Omaha, Nebraska

 68154
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(402) 453-4444

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value NYSE American

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports filed pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [X] 

Non-accelerated filer [  ]

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Smaller reporting company [  ]

[X]

Emerging growth company [  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange ActAct. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

 

The aggregate market value of the Company’s voting common stock held by non-affiliates, based upon the closing price of the stock on the NYSE American on June 30, 201729, 2018 was $63,729,857.$47,900,215. The Company does not have any non-voting common equity. As of April 16, 2018, 14,422,090March 1, 2019, 14,492,090 shares of common stock of Ballantyne Strong, Inc., were outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

 

 

 

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page No.
PART I
Item 1.Business3
Item 1A.Risk Factors9
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments16
Item 2.Properties16
Item 3.Legal Proceedings17
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures17
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities17
Item 6.Selected Financial Data17
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations17
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk24
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data25
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure60
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures60
Item 9B.Other Information60
PART III 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance460
Item 11.Executive Compensation1161
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters2661
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence3061
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services3261
PART IV 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules3262
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary65
 Signatures3366

 

 2 
 

 

Explanatory ParagraphFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

On March 15, 2018, Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (the “Company”) filed, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), itsThis Annual Report on Form 10-K forcontains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report” or “Form 10-K”). This Amendment No. 2 updates Part III to contain certain additional information required therein.

Except for the changes to Part III and the filingmeaning of related certifications added to the list of Exhibits in Part IV, this Amendment makes no other changes to the Form 10-K. This Amendment does not amend, update, or change the financial statements or any other items or disclosures contained in the Report and does not otherwise reflect events occurring after the original filing dateSection 27A of the Report. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s filings with the SEC subsequent to the filingSecurities Act of the Report.

As used in this Amendment, the terms “Ballantyne,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us” refer to Ballantyne Strong, Inc.

3

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers1933, as amended, and Corporate Governance

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Set forth below is certain information regarding the membersSection 21E of the Company’s Board of Directors, including the year in which each current director became a director of the Company. Each director is entitled to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting and until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier retirement, resignation or removal.

D. Kyle Cerminara, age 40, has been a director since February 2015, the Company’s Chairman since May 2015 and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since November 2015. Since April 2012, Mr. Cerminara has also served as the CEO, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor that manages equity and fixed income hedge funds and is the largest stockholder of the Company. In addition, Mr. Cerminara is Co-Chief Investment Officer of CWA Asset Management Group, LLC (d/b/a Capital Wealth Advisors), a wealth advisor and multi-family office affiliated with Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, which position he has held since December 2012. Mr. Cerminara also serves as President and Trustee of StrongVest ETF Trust and Chief Executive Officer of StrongVest Global Advisors, LLC. StrongVest Global Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ballantyne Strong, is an investment advisor, and Capital Wealth Advisors is a sub-advisor, to CWA Income ETF, an exchange-traded fund and series of StrongVest ETF Trust. Mr. Cerminara is a member of the Board of Directors of a number of publicly held companies focused in the technology, insurance and communications sectors, including RELM Wireless Corporation (NYSE American: RWC), a publicly traded manufacturer, since July 2015, 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: PIH), a holding company, which, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in providing property and casualty insurance, since December 2016, and Itasca Capital, Ltd. (TSXV: ICL) (formerly Kobex Capital Corp.), a publicly traded investment firm, since June 2016. Mr. Cerminara was also appointed chairman of RELM Wireless Corporation in March 2017. He also served on the Board of Directors of Iteris, Inc. (Nasdaq: ITI), a provider of intelligent information solutions for traffic management, from August 2016 to November 2017, and Magnetek, Inc., a publicly traded manufacturer, in 2015. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Blueharbor Bank. Prior to co-founding FGI and partnering with Capital Wealth Advisors, Mr. Cerminara was a Portfolio Manager at Sigma Capital Management, an independent financial adviser, from 2011 to 2012, a Director and Sector Head of the Financials Industry at Highside Capital Management from 2009 to 2011, and a Portfolio Manager and Director at CR Intrinsic Investors from 2007 to 2009. Before joining CR Intrinsic Investors, Mr. Cerminara was a Vice President, Associate Portfolio Manager and Analyst at T. Rowe Price from 2001 to 2007 and an Analyst at Legg Mason from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Cerminara received an MBA from the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia and a B.S. in Finance and Accounting from the Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, where he was a member of Omicron Delta Kappa, an NCAA Academic All American and Co-Captain of the men’s varsity tennis team. He also completed a China Executive Residency at the Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business in Beijing, China. Mr. Cerminara holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. Mr. Cerminara brings to the Board the perspective of one of the Company’s most significant stockholders. He also has extensive experience in the financial industry, including investing, capital allocation, finance and financial analysis of public companies, and operational experience as our CEO, which qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Samuel C. Freitag, age 62, has been an independent private investor since January of 2004. From July 2002 to December 2003, he was President of McCarthy Capital Corporation, a private equity fund manager of approximately $300 million in capital. From 1986 until 1997, he held various positions with George K. Baum Merchant Bank, LLC, including serving as Senior Managing Director and Director, Investment Banking. Mr. Freitag has served as a director of Ballantyne since June 2011. Mr. Freitag’s investment banking experience and service on other boards of directors provide him the executive experience and knowledge to qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

William J. Gerber, age 60, served as Chief Financial Officer of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (Nasdaq: AMTD) (TD Ameritrade), a provider of securities brokerage services and related technology-based financial services to retail investors, traders and independent registered investment advisors, from October 2006 to October 2015. In May 2007, he was named Executive Vice President of TD Ameritrade. In his role as Chief Financial Officer, he oversaw investor relations, business development, certain treasury functions and finance operations, including accounting, business planning and forecasting, external and internal reporting, tax and competitive intelligence. From May 1999 until October 2006, he served as the Managing Director of Finance at TD Ameritrade, during which time he played a significant role in evaluating merger and acquisition opportunities. Prior to joining TD Ameritrade, he served as Vice President of Acceptance Insurance Companies, Inc., where he was responsible for all aspects of mergers and acquisitions, investment banking activity, banking relationships, investor communications and portfolio management. Prior to joining Acceptance, Mr. Gerber spent eight years with Coopers & Lybrand, now known as PricewaterhouseCoopers, serving as an audit manager primarily focusing on public company clients. Mr. Gerber was named to Institutional Investor Magazine’s All-America Executive Team as one of the top three CFOs in the Brokerage, Asset Managers and Exchanges category (2012 and 2013). He was also named a member of the CNBC CFO Council (2013 and 2014). Since January 2017, he has served on the Board of Directors of Northwestern Mutual Series Fund, a mutual fund company. He has also served on the Board of Directors of the U.S. holding company for the Royal Bank of Canada since July 2016 and Streck, Inc., a privately held company, since March 2015. He also serves on the Boys Town National Board of Trustees. He previously served on the Board of Directors for CTMG Inc., a privately held pharmaceutical testing company. Mr. Gerber holds a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Michigan. Mr. Gerber is also a CPA in the State of Michigan. Mr. Gerber has served as a director of the Company since May 2015. Mr. Gerber served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TD Ameritrade, an online brokerage business, for more than eight years and has extensive financial experience, bringing valuable skills to our Board of Directors.

Lewis M. Johnson, age 48, has served as a director of Ballantyne since May 2016. Mr. Johnson has served as the President, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor that manages equity and fixed income hedge funds and is the largest stockholder of the Company, since April 2012. In addition, Mr. Johnson is Co-Chief Investment Officer of CWA Asset Management Group, LLC (d/b/a Capital Wealth Advisors), a wealth advisor and multi-family office affiliated with Fundamental Global Investors, LLC. Prior to co-founding Fundamental Global Investors, LLC and partnering with Capital Wealth Advisors, Mr. Johnson was a private investor from 2010 to 2012. From 2008 to 2010 Mr. Johnson served as Portfolio Manager and Managing Director at Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy. Previously Mr. Johnson was a Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager and Analyst at Pequot Capital from 2006 to 2007. Prior to joining Pequot Capital, he was a Vice President and Analyst at T. Rowe Price from 2000 to 2006. He worked as an Analyst at Capital Research and Management in 1999 and a Vice President at AYSA from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Johnson received an MBA from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania in addition to a MA in Political Science and a BA in International Studies from Emory University, where he graduated Magna Cum Laude and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. Mr. Johnson has served on the Board of Directors of RELM Wireless Corporation (NYSE American: RWC), a publicly traded manufacturer, since May 2016, and on the Board of Directors of 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: PIH), a holding company, which, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in providing property and casualty insurance, since April 2017. Mr. Johnson brings to the Board the perspective of one of the Company’s most significant stockholders. He has extensive experience in the financial industry, including investing, capital allocation, finance and financial analysis of public companies.

Charles T. Lanktree, age 68, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Eggland’s Best, LLC, a joint venture between Eggland’s Best, Inc. and Land O’Lakes, Inc. distributing nationally branded eggs, since 2012. Since 1997, Mr. Lanktree has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Eggland’s Best, Inc., a franchise-driven consumer egg business, where he previously served as the President and Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1996 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Lanktree currently serves on the Board of Directors of Eggland’s Best, Inc. and several of its affiliates. He has also served on the board of directors of RELM Wireless Corporation (NYSE American: RWC), a publicly traded manufacturer, since March 2017. From 2010 to 2013, he served on the Board of Directors of Eurofresh Foods, Inc., a privately held company, and from 2004 to 2013, he was on the Board of Directors of Nature’s Harmony Foods, Inc. Prior to joining Eggland’s Best, Inc., Mr. Lanktree served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of American Mobile Communications, Inc. from 1987 to 1990 and as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Precision Target Marketing, Inc. from 1985 to 1987. From 1976 to 1985, he held various executive-level marketing positions with The Grand Union Company and Beech-Nut Foods Corporation. Mr. Lanktree received an MBA from the University of Notre Dame and a B.S. in Food Marketing from St. Joseph’s College. He also served in the U.S. Army and U.S. Army Reserves from 1971 to 1977. Mr. Lanktree has served as a director of Ballantyne since May 2015. Mr. Lanktree’s 25 years of experience in consumer marketing and retail operations and his extensive experience as a Chief Executive Officer, coupled with his knowledge and insight of the retail industry, including distribution and franchising operations, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Robert J. Roschman, age 52, has been an owner of Triple R. Associates, Ltd., a real estate firm with over 100 properties leased to fast food, distribution and retail tenants, since 1992. Mr. Roschman also holds ownership interests in several development properties throughout Florida. Mr. Roschman currently serves on the Board of Directors of Giant Holdings, Inc., a privately held federally chartered bank with an Internet division, which he founded in 1998. From 1987 to 2000, Mr. Roschman was a Co-Founder and Vice President of Snapps Restaurants, Inc., a 76-store fast food restaurant which merged into Rally’s Hamburgers, Inc. From 1983 until 1997, he served as a shareholder of Charter Bank in Delray Beach, Florida, which merged into Southtrust Bank in 1997. Mr. Roschman received a B.S. from Florida State University. He has served as a director of the Company since May 2015. Mr. Roschman brings over 30 years of experience as an investor in multiple lines of business, including real estate, franchising, distribution, banking and retail. Mr. Roschman’s extensive experience as an investor and in managing and overseeing multiple businesses is valuable for evaluating strategic opportunities and qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

James C. Shay, age 54, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Hallmark Cards, Inc., a retailer of greeting cards and gifts, which position he has held since January 2016. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President – Finance at Hallmark since August 2015. Previously, Mr. Shay served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Strategic Planning, and Chief Financial Officer for Great Plains Energy, Inc. (NYSE: GXP), a public utility holding company, and Kansas City Power & Light Company, an electric utility company, from 2010 to 2015, Chief Financial Officer for Northern Power Systems from 2009 to 2010, Managing Director of Frontier Investment Bank from 2007 to 2009, Chief Financial Officer for Machine Laboratory, LLC (after its acquisition from BOA) from 2004 to 2006 and in various positions with BHA from 1992 until its acquisition of Machine Laboratory LLC in 2004. Mr. Shay is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Shay has served as a director of Ballantyne since May 2012. He is also a member of the MRI Global Board of Trustees and its Finance and Audit Committee, the University of Kansas School of Business Advisory Board and the University of Kansas Hospital Advancement Board. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (formerly, Nasdaq: CRWN). Mr. Shay’s extensive background in finance and accounting as well as his executive experience qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Ndamukong Suh, age 31, is an independent private investor. Mr. Suh holds ownership interests in several real estate development projects across Michigan, Nebraska, Oregon and Colorado. Mr. Suh is the Founder and a director of the Ndamukong Suh Family Foundation. He is also a professional athlete, with the Los Angeles Rams, a National Football League (“NFL”) franchise. Prior to joining the Los Angeles Rams, he was with the NFL’s Miami Dolphins from 2015 to 2017 and Detroit Lions from 2010 to 2014. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Ember Technologies, a privately held manufacturer and designer of patented temperature adjustable dishware and drinkware. Mr. Suh holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering focused on Construction Management from the University of Nebraska. Mr. Suh has served as a director of Ballantyne since January 2016. Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Suh’s well cultivated business and personal network adds unique value to the Company, which, coupled with his extensive experience as an investor, allows him to evaluate strategic opportunities and qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors operates pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and has also adopted several corporate governance policies to address significant corporate governance issues. Our Code of Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and Compensation Committee Charter are available on our website atwww.ballantynestrong.comunder the tab “Investors” and then the “Corporate Governance” tab.

6

Board Leadership Structure and Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

D. Kyle Cerminara is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Cerminara represents the Company’s largest stockholder, which, together with its affiliates, holds 28.2% of the voting and economic interest in the Company. As such, Mr. Cerminara may be deemed to be the Company’s controlling stockholder. It is Mr. Cerminara’s opinion that a controlling stockholder who is active in the business, as is currently the case, should hold both the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, setting the tone of the organization, having the ultimate responsibility for all of the Company’s operating and strategic functions, and providing unified leadership and direction to the Board of Directors and the Company’s executive management. This opinion is shared by our Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has not named a lead independent director, but receives strong leadership from all of its members. Our Board committees consist of only independent members, and our independent directors meet at least annually in executive session without the presence of non-independent directors and management. In addition, our directors take active and substantial roles in the activities of our Board at the full board meetings. They are able to propose items for board meeting agendas, and the Board’s meetings include time for discussion of items not on the formal agenda. Our Board believes that this open structure, as compared to a system in which there is a designated lead independent director, facilitates a greater sense of responsibility among our directors and facilitates active and effective oversight by the independent directors of the Company’s operations and strategic initiatives, including any risks.

One of the Board’s key functions is informed oversight of the Company’s risk management process. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, the Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic and operational risk exposure. The Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also provides oversight of the performance of the internal audit function. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance policies and the selection of prospective Board members and their qualifications. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with the Audit Committee, assesses and monitors whether any of the Company’s compensation policies and programs have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Like all businesses, we also face threats to our cybersecurity, as we are reliant upon information systems and the Internet to conduct our business activities. In light of the pervasive and increasing threat from cyberattacks, the Board believes oversight of this risk is appropriately allocated to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, with input from management, assesses the Company’s cybersecurity threats and the measures implemented by the Company to mitigate and prevent cyberattacks and periodically reports on the Company’s cybersecurity program to the Board.

Typically, the entire Board meets with management and the applicable Board committees at least annually to evaluate and monitor respective areas of oversight. Both the Board as a whole and the various standing committees receive periodic reports from individuals responsible for risk management, as well as incidental reports as matters may arise. It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible. The Board’s role in risk oversight does not affect the Board’s leadership structure. However, our Board’s leadership structure supports such risk oversight by combining the Chairman position with the Chief Executive Officer position, the person with primary corporate responsibility for risk management.

Communication to the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors or a specific director may do so by delivering written correspondence to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at: Attn: Corporate Secretary, Ballantyne Strong, Inc., 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68154. The Corporate Secretary will present the communication to the appropriate director or directors.

Board and Committee Meeting Attendance

The Board of Directors held 12 meetings during 2017. Each director attended at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the aggregate of the total number of board meetings held during the period for which he has been a director and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he served during the periods that he served.

All of the directors, with the exception of Mr. Gerber, attended the 2017 Annual Meeting. Other than Mr. Cerminara, none of the directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting.

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee. The current charters for each of the Committees are available on our websitewww.ballantynestrong.com under the “Investors” tab and then the “Corporate Governance” tab. The members of the Board committees, as of the date of this Form 10-K/A, are identified in the following table:

DirectorAudit CommitteeCompensation CommitteeNominating and Corporate Governance Committee
D. Kyle Cerminara*
Samuel C. FreitagXXChair
William J. Gerber**ChairXX
Lewis M. JohnsonX
Charles T. LanktreeChairX
Robert J. RoschmanXX
James C. Shay**XXX
Ndamukong Suh

* Chairman of the Board.

** Mr. Shay served as Audit Committee Chairman until immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting on June 15, 2017, at which time Mr. Gerber was appointed as Chairman.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors consists of directors Gerber (Chair), Freitag and Shay, who are independent for purposes of serving on the committee under the SEC’s rules and NYSE American’s listing requirements. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. All Audit Committee members are financially literate. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Gerber and Shay are each an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directorsamended. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made in fulfilling its responsibilities for oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and reporting practices of the Company, and performs such other duties as are directed by the Board. The Committee’s role includes a particular focus on the qualitative aspects of financial reporting to stockholders, andpress releases, orally, at conferences, on the Company’s processes to manage business and financial risk, and for compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical and regulatory requirements. At least annually and generallywebsite, or otherwise, by or on a quarterly basis, the Committee reviews and discusses matters separately with managementbehalf of the Company. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company performance. These statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goal,” “believes,” “continue” and withother similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” These statements involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Company’s independent auditors.control. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 

The Committee is directly responsible forYou should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the appointmentfollowing uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed elsewhere in this report, including under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the independent registered public accounting firm engagedCompany’s subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings for further information about factors that could affect such forward-looking statements: the Company’s ability to prepareexpand its revenue streams, potential interruptions of supplier relationships or higher prices charged by suppliers, the Company’s ability to successfully compete and issue an audit reportintroduce enhancements and new features that achieve market acceptance and that keep pace with technological developments, the Company’s ability to successfully execute its capital allocation strategy, the Company’s ability to maintain its brand and reputation and retain or replace its significant customers, the impact of a challenging global economic environment or a downturn in the markets, economic and political risks of selling products in foreign countries, risks of non-compliance with U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, potential sales tax collection obligations and claims for uncollected amounts, cybersecurity risks and risks of damage and interruptions of information technology systems, the Company’s ability to retain key members of management and successfully integrate new executives, the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions, strategic investments, entry into new lines of business, divestitures, mergers or other transactions on acceptable terms or at all, the financialCompany’s ability to utilize or assert its intellectual property rights, the impact of natural disasters and other catastrophic events, the adequacy of insurance and the impact of having a controlling stockholder.

Given the risks and uncertainties, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and internal controlsshould recognize that the statements are predictions of future results which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein, as well as others not now anticipated. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company and periodically reviews and evaluates their performance and independence from management. All audit and permitted non-audit services are pre-approved by the Committee. The Committee has delegated the responsibility of approving proposed non-audit services that arise between Committee meetingsassumes no obligation to the Chairman, provided that the decisionupdate forward-looking statements to approve the services is presented for ratification at the next scheduled Committee meeting. During 2017, the Committee held ten meetings.reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

PART I

 

Compensation CommitteeItem 1. Business

 

The Compensation CommitteeGeneral Description of Business

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (“Ballantyne” or the Company’s Board of Directors consists of directors Lanktree (Chair)“Company”), Freitag, Gerber, Roschmana Delaware corporation established in 1932, is a holding company with the following wholly owned subsidiaries: Strong Technical Services, Inc., Strong/MDI Screen Systems, Inc. (“Strong/MDI”), Convergent Media Systems Corporation (“Convergent”), Strong Digital Media, LLC and Shay. All members of the CommitteeStrongVest Global Advisors, LLC. Ballantyne went public in 1995; our shares are independent for purposes of servingtraded on the committeeNYSE American market under the NYSE American’s listing requirementssymbol “BTN.” Our website iswww.ballantynestrong.com.

The Company conducts its operations through three operating segments: Strong Cinema, Convergent and applicable SECStrong Outdoor. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we separated our former Digital Media segment into two separate segments - Convergent and tax regulations. Strong Outdoor. All prior periods have been recast in our segment reporting to reflect the current segment organization.

The Compensation Committee acts underCompany’s strategic plan contemplates a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Committee functions include, but are not limited to:combination of:

 

 DeterminingInvesting in the compensationoperations and growth of the Chief Executive Officer;
Overseeing all other executive officers’ compensation, including salary and payments under the Company’s incentive and stock plans;our existing businesses;
   
 Administering the Company’s stock compensation plans, including approving all individual grants and awards under these plans;Evaluating opportunities to maximize value by monetizing investments in our existing businesses; and
   
 Reviewing compensation for non-employee directors and recommending changes to the Board.Investing in public companies, private companies or other areas.

 

These investments may involve investments in other public companies or acquisitions of businesses, which may be within or outside of the Company’s existing markets. We intend our investments in public companies to be made in circumstances where we believe that we will be able to exercise significant influence or control. The CommitteeCompany may delegate its authorityalso seek to sell a subcommitteeminority, majority or all of its members. Further discussionexisting businesses as part of its holding company strategy.

The Company holds investments in two public companies: approximately 17.3% of 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: PIH), a provider of property and casualty insurance in the States of Louisiana, Texas and Florida and 32.3% of Itasca Capital Ltd. (TSX Venture: ICL), a holding company that holds a significant position in Limbach Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: LMB), a leading commercial provider of HVAC construction and related services.

Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, the funds that it manages, its other affiliates, and the directors and officers of the Compensation Committee can be found underCompany and their affiliates together currently hold approximately 36.1% of the heading “Compensation DiscussionCompany’s outstanding stock. In some cases, funds managed by Fundamental Global Investors, LLC may acquire positions in the same public companies as the Company. Fundamental Global Investors’ funds currently hold positions in 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Analysis.” The Committee held seven meetings during 2017.Itasca Capital Ltd.

Operating Segments

 

NominatingStrong Cinema

Overview

We provide high quality projection screens, technical support services and Corporate Governance Committeeother related products to the cinema exhibition industry. We also distribute and support third party products including digital projectors, servers, library management systems, menu boards and sound systems.

Products

Cinema Screens and Support Systems— We are the largest supplier of premium projection screens to the cinema industry in North America. We have an exclusive relationship to supply large format screens to IMAX theaters and supply most of the other major cinema operators worldwide. We also manufacture innovative screen support structures custom built to adapt to virtually any venue requirement, with a unique self-standing modular construction that allows for easy assembly and adjustable size.

In addition, we manufacture and distribute screens outside of the cinema industry for special events and theme parks. Our Eclipse curvilinear screens are designed to provide maximum viewer engagement in media-based attractions and immersive projection environments. The solid surface minimizes light loss to maintain higher resolution at lower lumen output. Patented speaker panels allow selective placement of rear mounted speakers to ensure the audio derives from the source media on screen. Applications include interactive dark rides, 3D/4D theme park rides, flying theaters and motion simulators.

We believe that our screens are the highest quality in the industry, driven by our innovative manufacturing process, focus on quality control and our proprietary coatings. We believe we are the only major screen manufacturer that develops and produces its own proprietary coatings, which are critical to the overall quality, increased screen reflectivity and brightness and continued innovation of our screens.

Technical Services –We provide digital cinema equipment installations and after-sale maintenance and network support services to the cinema industry. Our field service technicians and our Network Operations Center (“NOC”) staff work hand in hand to resolve system and other issues for our cinema customers. We service our customers under recurring revenue contracts providing for maintenance and repair to a wide range of installed digital equipment, providing our customers with a reliable turnkey outsourced service option. We also provide services to our customers not covered by maintenance contracts on a time and materials basis. Our NOC, staffed by software engineers and systems techs, operates 24/7/365 and monitors our customers’ networked equipment remotely, often providing proactive solutions to systems issues before they cause system failures.

Other Products –We distribute projectors, servers, audio systems and other third-party products including library management systems, lenses and lamps to our cinema customers in North and South America.

Markets

We sell our screen systems worldwide, with our primary markets being North America and Asia. Screen systems are primarily sold on a direct basis, although we also use third-party distributors and integrators in some markets.

We have non-exclusive distribution agreements with NEC and Barco that allow us to market digital projectors in North and South America.

We provide technical services in the United States. We market and sell our services directly to theater owners and through dealers or Value Added Reseller (“VAR”) networks.

Competition

While there are numerous smaller screen manufacturing companies, the primary competitor in the worldwide cinema screen market is Harkness Screens. Competitive factors include product performance characteristics, quality, availability, location and price.

The markets for other Strong Cinema products and services are highly competitive and the industry is fragmented. The primary competitive factors are price, product quality, features and customer support. Competition in the digital cinema equipment market includes other integrators and resellers. Manufacturers may also sell equipment directly to cinema exhibitors, especially for large orders. Our primary competition for installation, after-sale maintenance, and NOC services is Christie Digital, as well as smaller suppliers and in some cases internal resources of cinema exhibitors.

Convergent

Overview

Convergent delivers digital signage solutions and services to various enterprise markets, including retail, banking and healthcare, as well as certain government agencies and Digital-Out-Of-Home (“DOOH”) advertising network operators. These markets are served through the capabilities that we developed from the acquisition of Convergent in 2013. While there is digital signage equipment sold within this segment, the primary focus of this segment is providing integrated, fully-managed solutions to our customers. We market these solutions as “Digital Signage as a Service” (DSaaS) because they provide an end-to-end solution that includes hardware, software, content development and distribution, network monitoring, support and field maintenance services, all for a single monthly fee. Our “as-a-service” model lowers up-front customer capital costs, allows customers to scale more easily and allows them to ‘turn on’ or ‘turn off’ features as needed.

Interactive Solutions

IMPACT –This consumer-facing digital signage solution enables retailers, banks and healthcare providers to promote their products and services and thereby improve the consumer experience, enhance their brand and positively impact sales. It supports single and multi-screen video walls, large-scale LED displays and storefront window displays. Optional services include touchscreens with interactive applications to get information about merchandise (“Lift & Learn”) and enable searching and ordering merchandise that’s not available in the store (“Endless Aisle”). It also includes access to a web portal that enables customers to view the availability of their digital signage network and the content being played at any time.

INSPIRE –This employee-facing digital signage solution enables enterprise businesses and government organizations to more effectively communicate with their employees to improve productivity by reinforcing training and delivering motivational messaging, and reduce operational costs through greater compliance and reduced employee turnover. It supports regular displays and touchscreens, typically situated in retail storage rooms, lunchrooms, distribution centers, factories, call centers and sales offices. Optional services include syndicated feeds for news, weather, traffic, and wellness information; social media feeds (e.g., Twitter, Instagram); custom designed motion graphic videos that are fed from a web form or other data source; and data visualization templates that display information from a customer database or application. This service also supports live-streaming of town hall meetings, storage and playback of videos (“Video-on-Demand”), and the ability to programmatically switch from the digital signage content to regular TV content from the customer’s cable or satellite TV set-top box. It also includes access to a web portal that enables customers to view the availability of their digital signage network and the content being played at any time.

INFLUENCE – This digital signage solution is designed specifically for Digital Out of Home (DOOH) ad network operators. It enables these companies to efficiently and cost-effectively distribute advertising to digital billboard and long-form video content to TVs in bars/restaurants and waiting rooms. Key features included peer-to-peer sharing of content to minimize internet bandwidth consumption for large video files, audience-analytics using a camera to measure viewer demographics and dwell time, and proof-of-play reporting. It also supports role-based access to a portal that enables advertisers to upload and schedule playback of their content in the specific time-slots that have been assigned to them by the customer, and view the availability of their digital signage network at any time.

Products and Services

Digital Signage as a Service (DSaaS) Platform –Our platform leverages internally developed and third-party software to automate the customer’s digital signage workflow, including from content creation, approval, storage and management, network deployment, monitoring, case management and incident resolution. Since it is cloud-based, it provides inherent scalability to enable customers to expand their network. The DSaaS platform supports a wide range of applications – all of which are managed through a web portal. New features and functionality are frequently added, both through the efforts of our in-house software development team and integration with an ever-growing ecosystem of third-party applications. We primarily use media players from BrightSign, LLC in our DSaaS offerings. Our DSaaS offerings provide the Company with recurring revenue.

Content Creation – We provide creative services to digital signage clients that include media strategy, content design and production. Our creative services team develops custom content to support the branding and marketing initiatives of each client.

Content Management and Distribution –Content management is provided to ensure accurate playback at the right place and at the right time based on a number of factors such as geography, site characteristics, location within a site or consumer demographics. We utilize our DSaaS platform for the management and distribution of content. Content is prepared, scheduled and centrally distributed from our cloud infrastructure.

Network Operations Center –Our NOC in Alpharetta, GA provides similar services to our Convergent customers as described underStrong Cinema above.

Installation and Maintenance –We provide digital signage installations and post-sale onsite maintenance services. Field technicians work closely with our NOC staff to resolve systems issues that cannot be fixed remotely. Each is certified to install and service a wide array of digital signage and audio equipment from a number of manufacturers. We offer cabling, wiring, installation and maintenance services in combination with the above digital signage solutions. We also offer long-term contractual service packages for installation, support and maintenance of satellite networks. The latter service stems from Convergent’s history of building satellite-based broadcast TV networks for corporations and government agencies, which they use primarily for training and town hall meetings.

Measurement and Analytics – We offer the tools and resources to measure the impact of digital signage solutions. We develop measurement criteria, establish benchmarks and identify control mechanisms to test the effectiveness of such solutions during proof of concept and full rollout scenarios.

Markets

Digital Signage – The digital signage market broadly defined includes all uses of digital display technologies and services to project promotional and informative content in the form of images, graphics, design collaterals, videos and creative advertising on digital displays. However, the Company is focused on certain segments of the market that use digital signage to (a) attract consumers into retail stores, banks and restaurants and attempt to influence their purchase decisions, and (b) engage employees with salient corporate messaging intended to positively influence their behavior. The primary sectors for these services include retail, hospitality, banking, healthcare, manufacturing and distribution.

Digital Out-of-Home – The DOOH advertising market is a subset of the overall out-of-home advertising market that includes in-store digital displays and interactive promotion kiosks. DOOH marketing campaigns consist of a network of digital displays that are centrally managed and target both mobile and captive customers outside the home. Some definitions of the DOOH market include digital signage used by companies to promote their goods and services. However, in this context, we define it as digital signage that is used for advertising any goods and services. We are primarily focused on pursuing DOOH communication opportunities within the hospitality and transportation markets.

Enterprise Video – The Enterprise Video market consists of organizations seeking to use video communications for employee training and town hall meetings. We are primarily focused on pursuing Enterprise Video opportunities within the government, banking, retail and corporate markets.

Competition

There are many players in our markets who have expertise in integration. Some of the key players include Diversified Media Group and Stratacache.

Strong Outdoor

Overview

We provide advertising services and experiential marketing services through Strong Outdoor. We started the business in early 2018 and provide out-of-home advertising services on over 3,500 taxicabs in New York City. We established Strong Digital Media, LLC as the legal entity to conduct this business. We sell advertising to corporate media buyers and advertising agencies for display on vinyl printed signs and digital signs.

In 2019, we are expanding Strong Outdoor to include experiential marketing services and may expand Strong Outdoor’s services in other markets outside of New York City.

Products and Services

Digital Taxi Top Advertising –We operate 300 full-motion 45” double-sided digital displays. The displays are 10 times brighter than a typical HD television for high visibility day and night. Our content management software allows for geo-targeting of advertising to specific neighborhoods, retail areas and airports.

Premium Taxi Top Advertising –Our 16” by 54” premium taxi tops are the largest in the market and contain new illumination systems to provide the brightest static screens on the street.

7

Traditional Taxi Top Advertising –Our 14” by 48” panels are fully illuminated and provide millions of daily cost-effective advertising impressions for our customers.

Experiential Marketing – We are beginning expansion into experiential marketing, realizing the need for brands to not only reach consumers on a mass level but to create connections with consumers on a more personal level. We plan to do this by utilizing taxi assets and doing stagings and free rides, but also creating opportunities by building out locations. We also intend to create touch points for brands in vehicles that are not taxis, such as glass trucks, and utilize projection for brands to make huge impact around festivals such as CES, SXSW, Coachella, etc.

Markets

Strong Outdoor currently operates only in the New York City taxicab market. We may consider expanding into other major metropolitan areas after attaining profitability in our initial market. Our customers include advertisers of feature films, television programs, Broadway shows and various consumer products and services.

Competition

There are over 13,000 yellow taxicabs in the New York City market. Other media and taxicab service companies provide taxi-top advertising services for taxicabs not subject to our agreement. We also compete with other forms of out-of-home advertising.

Financial Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 46% of 2018 consolidated net revenues. Trade accounts receivable from these customers represented approximately 45% of net consolidated receivables at December 31, 2018.

Manufacturing

We manufacture cinema screens through Strong/MDI, our screen subsidiary in Joliette, Quebec, Canada. These manufacturing operations consist of an 83,000 square-foot facility for the manufacture of cinema screen systems. These facilities include expanded PVC welding operations with programmable automations, as well as two 90-foot high screen coating towers with state of the art precision coating application software and painting systems. This world class ISO certified operation has the capability of manufacturing multiple standard screens simultaneously to large format 2D and 3D screens for cinema and special venue applications.

Quality Control

We believe that our quality control procedures and the quality standards for the products that we manufacture, distribute or service have contributed significantly to our reputation for high performance and reliability. The inspection of incoming materials and components as well as the testing of all of our products during various stages of the sales and service cycle are key elements of this program.

Trademarks

We own or otherwise have rights to various trademarks and trade names used in conjunction with the sale of our products. We believe our success will not be dependent upon trademark protection, but rather upon our scientific and engineering capabilities and research and production techniques. We consider the following trademarks to be of value to our business: Strong® and Convergent™.

Employees

We employed 294 persons at December 31, 2018, substantially all of which were full-time. Of these employees, 154 positions were considered manufacturing or operational, 75 were service related and 65 were considered sales and administrative. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement.


Regulation

We are subject to complex laws, rules and regulations affecting our domestic and international operations relating to, for example, environmental, safety and health requirements; exports and imports; bribery and corruption; tax; data privacy; labor and employment; competition; and intellectual property ownership and infringement. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations may be onerous and expensive, and if we fail to comply or if we become subject to enforcement activity, our ability to manufacture our products and operate our business could be restricted and we could be subject to fines, penalties or other legal liability. Furthermore, should these laws, rules and regulations be amended or expanded, or new ones enacted, we could incur materially greater compliance costs or restrictions on our ability to manufacture our products and operate our business.

Some of these complex laws, rules and regulations – for example, those related to environmental, safety and health requirements – may particularly affect us in the jurisdictions in which we manufacture products, especially if such laws and regulations: require the use of abatement equipment beyond what we currently employ; require the addition or elimination of a raw material or process to or from our current manufacturing processes; or impose costs, fees or reporting requirements on the direct or indirect use of energy, or of materials or gases used or emitted into the environment, in connection with the manufacture of our products. There can be no assurance that in all instances a substitute for a prohibited raw material or process would be available, or be available at reasonable cost.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

The membersOur business and financial performance are subject to various risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. We discuss in this section some of the Nominatingrisk factors that, if they actually occurred, could materially and Corporate Governance Committee are directors Freitag (Chair), Gerber, Johnson, Lanktree, Roschmanadversely affect our business, financial condition and Shay. All membersresults of operations. In that event, the Nominatingtrading price of our common stock could decline and Corporate Governance Committee are independent for purposesyou may lose part or all of servingyour investment. You should consider these risk factors in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect subsequent events or circumstances or the committee under the NYSE American’s listing requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee acts under a written charter adopted by the Boardoccurrence of Directors. The functions of the Committee include, among other items, overseeing all aspects of the Company’s corporate governance functions including compliance with significant legal, ethical and regulatory requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reports to, and assists, the Board of Directors in identifying individuals for membership to the Board and recommends to the Board the director nominees for the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings during 2017.unanticipated events.

 

Director Nomination ProcessIf we are unable to expand our revenue streams to compensate for the lower demand for our digital cinema products and installation services, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.—The Nominating

A significant portion of our revenue in recent years has been generated from the theater exhibition industry’s need for digital cinema equipment and Corporate Governance Committee believesservices to support the industry’s transformation from film to digital equipment. This transition required us to commit substantial resources to the process of retrofitting existing theater complexes by removing the film equipment and replacing it with digital equipment, and we experienced significant financial gains from this work. With the completion of this digital conversion by North America theater exhibitors, we are no longer able to rely on that income as a major source of our earnings. If we are unable to expand our revenue streams with other products and services, our future growth would be significantly curtailed.

Interruptions of, or higher prices of, components from our suppliers may affect our results of operations and financial performance.

A portion of our revenues are dependent on the Company is well-serveddistribution of products supplied by its current directors. In the ordinary course, absent special circumstances or a material change in the criteria for Board membership, the Committee will re-nominate incumbent directors who continuevarious key suppliers. If we fail to be qualified for Board service and are willing to continue as directors. If an incumbent director is not standing for re-electionmaintain satisfactory relationships with our suppliers, or if our suppliers experience significant financial difficulties, we could experience difficulty in obtaining needed goods and services. Some suppliers could also decide to reduce inventories or raise prices to increase cash flow. The loss of any one or more of our suppliers could have an adverse effect on our business, and we may be unable to secure alternative manufacturing arrangements. Even if we are able to obtain alternative manufacturing arrangements, such arrangements may not be on terms similar to our current arrangements or we may be forced to accept less favorable terms in order to secure a vacancy occurs between annual stockholder meetings,supplier as quickly as possible so as to minimize the Committee will seek out potential candidates for Board appointment whoimpact on our business operations. In addition, any required changes in our suppliers could cause delays in our operations and increase our production costs and new suppliers may not be able to meet the criteria for selectionour production demands as a nominee and have the specific qualitiesto volume, quality or skills being sought. Director candidates will be selected based upon input from the members of the Board, senior management of the Company and, if the Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm.timeliness.

 

Candidates will be chosenThe markets for their ability to represent all of the stockholders,our products and for their character, judgment, fairnessservices are highly competitive and overall ability. As a group, they are expected to set the appropriate policy for the Company, and to bring to the Board of Directors broad experience in business matters and an insight and awareness of the appropriate and ever-changing role that corporations should have in society. Because the advice of those facing similar issuesif market share is of particular value, executive officers of other corporations are desirable candidates. Ballantyne does not have a set policy or process for considering “diversity”, however that termlost, we may be defined,unable to lower our cost structure quickly enough to offset the loss of revenue.

Within the Strong Cinema business, the domestic and international markets for our product lines are highly competitive, evolving and subject to rapid technological and other changes. Our Convergent and Strong Outdoor businesses, in identifying nominees. However,particular, are highly dependent on technology. We expect the Nominating and Governance Committee strivesintensity of competition in each of these areas to identify and recruit individuals whose diverse talents, experiences and backgrounds enhancecontinue in the inclusive environment in which the Board currently functions. The Committee relies upon its judgmentfuture for a number of the foregoing general criteria and the following personal criteria in selecting candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors:reasons including:

 

 IndependenceCertain of the competitors for our digital equipment have longer operating histories and absencegreater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do, which, among other things, may permit them to adopt aggressive pricing policies. As a result, we may suffer from pricing pressures that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and our results of conflictsoperations. Some of interest;our competitors also have greater name and brand recognition and a larger customer base than us.
   
 Honesty, integritySome of our competitors are manufacturing their own digital equipment while we employ a distribution business model through our distribution agreements with NEC, Barco and accountability;certain other suppliers. As a result, we may suffer from pricing pressures that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.
   
 Substantial business experience with a practical applicationSuppliers could decide to the Company’s needs;utilize their current sales force to supply their products directly to customers rather than utilizing channels.

In addition, we face competition for consumer attention from other forms of entertainment. The other forms of entertainment may be more attractive to consumers than those utilizing our technologies, which could harm our business, prospects and operating results.

For these and other reasons, we must continue to enhance our technologies and our existing products and services and introduce new high quality technologies, products and services to meet the wide variety of competitive pressures that we face. If we are unable to compete successfully, our business, prospects and results of operations will be materially adversely impacted.

Our capital allocation strategy may not be successful, which could adversely impact our financial condition.

We intend to continue investing part of our cash balances in public companies. We intend our investments in public companies to be made in circumstances where we believe that we will be able to exercise some degree of influence or control. Currently, our investments are highly concentrated in two public companies – 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: PIH) and Itasca Capital Ltd. (TSX Venture: ICL). In some cases, funds controlled by the Company’s affiliate Fundamental Global Investors, LLC have, and may in the future, acquire positions in the same public companies as the Company. We may also invest in private companies or other areas, including acquisitions of businesses. These types of investments are riskier than holding our cash balances as bank deposits or, for example, such conservative investments as treasury bonds or money market funds. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or enhance the value or the performance of the companies in which we have invested or may invest in the future, or that we will achieve returns or benefits from these investments. Under certain circumstances, significant declines in the fair values of these investments may require the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment losses. We may lose all or part of our investment relating to such companies if their value decreases as a result of their financial performance or for any other reason. If our interests differ from those of other investors in companies over which we do not have control, we may be unable to effect any change at those companies. We are not required to meet any diversification standards, and our investments may continue to remain concentrated. In addition, we may seek to sell some or all of our existing businesses as part of our holding company strategy.

If our capital allocation strategy is not successful or we achieve less than expected returns from these investments, it could have a material adverse effect on us. The Board of Directors may also change our capital allocation strategy at any time, and such changes could further increase our exposure, which could adversely impact us.

If we are not able to develop and introduce enhancements and new features that achieve market acceptance or that keep pace with technological developments, our business could be harmed.

We operate in a dynamic environment characterized by rapidly changing technologies and industry and legal standards. Innovation is critical to our success. The introduction of new software solutions by our competitors, the market acceptance of solutions based on new or alternative technologies or the emergence of new industry standards could render our platform obsolete. Our ability to compete successfully, attract new customers and increase revenues from existing customers depends in part on our ability to enhance and improve our existing software platform and to identify new software partners, which would allow us to continually introduce or acquire new features that are in demand by the markets that we serve. The success of any enhancement or new solution depends on several factors, including timely completion and integration, adequate quality testing, introduction and market acceptance. Any new platform or feature that we develop or acquire may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain defects or may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenues. If we are unable to anticipate, or timely and successfully develop or acquire, new offerings or features, or enhance our existing platform to meet customer requirements, our business and operating results will be adversely affected. Additionally, for technologies that are acquired, we may not be able to successfully integrate or monetize the acquired technology at a rate that is consistent with the market’s expectations, which could have a material adverse impact on us.

If we are unable to maintain our brand and reputation, our business, results of operations and prospects could be materially harmed.

Our business, results of operations and prospects depend, in part, on maintaining and strengthening our brand and reputation for providing high quality products and services. Reputational value is based in large part on perceptions. Although reputations may take decades to build, any negative incidents can quickly erode trust and confidence, particularly if they result in adverse publicity, governmental investigations or litigation. If problems with our products cause operational disruption or other difficulties, or there are delays or other issues with the delivery of our products or services, our brand and reputation could be diminished. Damage to our reputation could also arise from actual or perceived legal violations, product safety issues, data security breaches, actual or perceived poor employee relations, actual or perceived poor service, actual or perceived poor privacy practices, operational or sustainability issues, actual or perceived ethical issues or other events within or outside of our control that generate negative publicity with respect to us. Any event that has the potential to negatively impact our reputation could lead to lost sales, loss of new opportunities and retention and recruiting difficulties. If we fail to promote and maintain our brand and reputation successfully, our business, results of operations and prospects could be materially harmed.

Our sales cycle can be long and unpredictable, particularly with respect to large enterprises, which could harm our business and operating results.

The timing of our sales is difficult to predict. Our sales efforts involve educating our customers, frequently at an executive level, about the use, potential return on investment, technical capabilities, security and other benefits of our solution. Customers often undertake a prolonged product-evaluation process, which frequently involves not only our solutions but also those of our competitors. As we continue to target our sales efforts at large enterprise customers, we will face greater costs, long sales cycles and less predictability in completing some of our sales. In this market segment, the customer’s decision to subscribe to our solution is often an enterprise-wide decision and may require us to provide even greater levels of education regarding the use and benefits of our solution and obtain support from multiple departments. In addition, prospective enterprise customers may require customized features and functions unique to their business process that may need acceptance testing related to those unique features. As a result of these factors, these sales opportunities may require us to devote greater sales support, operational support and professional services resources to individual customers, increasing costs and time required to complete sales and diverting our own sales and professional services resources to a smaller number of larger transactions. The long and unpredictable nature of our sales cycle could materially adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We are substantially dependent upon significant customers who could cease purchasing our products at any time.

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 46% of 2018 consolidated net revenues. Trade accounts receivable from these customers represented approximately 45% of net consolidated receivables at December 31, 2018. Most arrangements with these customers are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from the Company’s significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company has deferred tax assets that are subject to annual valuation testing, which assets may not be realized, thus negatively impacting us.

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. We consider the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A cumulative loss in a particular tax jurisdiction in recent years is a significant piece of evidence with respect to the realizability that is difficult to overcome. Based on the available objective evidence, including recent updates to the taxing jurisdictions generating income, we concluded that we should maintain our valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018. We face risks that our recorded deferred tax assets may not be realized, thus negatively impacting us.

Our business is subject to the economic and political risks of selling products in foreign countries.

Sales outside the United States (mainly Strong Cinema) continue to be significant, accounting for approximately 20% of consolidated sales in fiscal 2018. We expect that international sales will continue to be important to our business for the foreseeable future. Foreign sales are subject to general political and economic risks, including the recent actions by the U.S. federal government in its international trade and tariff policies, and any retaliatory measures that could be taken by foreign governments, which have created uncertainty regarding international trade, unanticipated or unfavorable circumstances arising from host country laws or regulations, unfavorable changes in U.S. policies on international trade and investment, the imposition of governmental economic sanctions on countries in which we do business, quotas, capital controls or other trade barriers, whether adopted by individual governments or addressed by regional trade blocks, threats of war, terrorism or governmental instability, currency controls, fluctuating exchange rates with respect to sales not denominated in U.S. dollars, changes in import/export regulations, tariffs and freight rates, potential negative consequences from changes to taxation policies, restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of a country and the disruption of operations from labor and political disturbances. Government policies on international trade and investment can affect the demand for our products, impact the competitive position of our products or prevent us from being able to sell or manufacture products in certain countries. The implementation of more restrictive trade policies, such as higher tariffs or new barriers to entry, in countries in which we sell large quantities of products and services could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, a government’s adoption of “buy national” policies or retaliation by another government against such policies could have a negative impact on our results of operations. If we were unable to navigate the foreign regulatory environment, or if we were unable to enforce our contract rights in foreign countries, our business could be adversely impacted. Any of these events could reduce our sales, limit the prices at which we can sell our products, interrupt our supply chain or otherwise have an adverse effect on our operating performance.

In addition, a portion of our foreign sales are denominated in foreign currencies and amounted to $4.7 million in 2018. To the extent that orders are denominated in foreign currencies, our reported sales and earnings are subject to foreign exchange fluctuations. In addition, there can be no assurance that our remaining international customers will continue to accept orders denominated in U.S. dollars. For those sales which are denominated in U.S. dollars, a weakening in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse impact on us by increasing the effective price of our products in international markets. Certain areas of the world are also more cost conscious than the U.S. market and there are instances where our products are priced higher than local manufacturers. We are also exposed to foreign currency fluctuations between the Canadian and U.S. dollar due to our screen manufacturing facility in Canada where a majority of its sales are denominated in the U.S. dollar while its expenses are denominated in Canadian currency. We cannot predict the effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future operating results because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates.

Any of these factors could adversely affect our foreign activities and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The risk of non-compliance with U.S. and foreign laws and regulations applicable to our international operations could have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial condition and strategic objectives.

Our global operations subject us to regulation by U.S. federal and state laws and multiple foreign laws, regulations and policies, which could result in conflicting legal requirements. These laws and regulations are complex, change frequently, have tended to become more stringent over time and increase our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include import and export control, environmental, health and safety regulations, data privacy requirements, international labor laws and work councils and anti-corruption and bribery laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.N. Convention Against Bribery and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials. We are subject to the risk that we, our employees, our affiliated entities, contractors, agents or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take action determined to be in violation of any of these laws. An actual or alleged violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil or criminal penalties, and debarment from government contracts, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, competitive or reputational harm, litigation or regulatory action and other consequences that might adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and strategic objectives.

We may become subject to additional sales tax collection obligations and claims for uncollected amounts.

The application of sales tax and other indirect taxes on cross border sales by remote sellers is continuing to change and evolve. In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decidedSouth Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., a case challenging the prior law under which sellers were not required to collect sales and use tax unless they have a physical presence in the buyer’s state. This decision will now allow states to adopt new or enforce existing laws requiring sellers to collect and remit sales and use tax, even in states in which the seller has no presence. The adoption or enforcement of any such legislation could result in additional sales and use tax collection responsibility for certain of our businesses. A number of states have already begun, or have positioned themselves to begin, requiring sales and use tax collection by remote sellers. We are in the process of determining how and when our collection practices may need to change in the relevant jurisdictions. It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may assert that we have liability for periods for which certain of our businesses have not collected sales, use or other similar taxes, and if such an assertion or assertions were successful, it could result in tax liabilities, including for past sales taxes and penalties and interest, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

A reversal of the U.S. economic recovery and a return to volatile or recessionary conditions in the United States or abroad could adversely affect our business or our access to capital markets in a material manner.

Worsening economic and market conditions, downside shocks, or a return to recessionary economic conditions could serve to reduce demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results. These economic conditions may also impact the financial condition of one or more of our key suppliers, which could affect our ability to secure product to meet our customers’ demand. In addition, a downturn in the cinema market could impact the valuation and collectability of certain long-term receivables held by us. We could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which we sell our products.

We rely extensively on our information technology systems and are vulnerable to damage and interruption.

We rely on our information technology systems and infrastructure to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business, including maintaining client and supplier information. Additionally, we utilize third parties, including cloud providers, to store, transfer and process data. Our information technology systems, as well as the systems of our customers, suppliers and other partners, whose systems we do not control, are vulnerable to outages and an increasing risk of continually evolving deliberate intrusions to gain access to company sensitive information. Likewise, data security incidents and breaches by employees and others with or without permitted access to our systems pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. A cyber-attack or other significant disruption involving our information technology systems, or those of our customers, suppliers and other partners, could also result in disruptions in critical systems, corruption or loss of data and theft of data, funds or intellectual property. We may be unable to prevent outages or security breaches in our systems. We remain potentially vulnerable to additional known or yet unknown threats as, in some instances, we, our suppliers and our other partners may be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. We also face the risk that we expose our customers or partners to cybersecurity attacks. Any or all of the foregoing could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows, as well as our business reputation.

Any failure to maintain the security of information relating to our customers, employees and suppliers, whether as a result of cybersecurity attacks or otherwise, could expose us to litigation, government enforcement actions and costly response measures, and could disrupt our operations and harm our reputation.

In connection with the sales and marketing of our products and services, we may from time to time transmit confidential information. We also have access to, collect or maintain private or confidential information regarding our customers, employees, and suppliers, as well as our business. Cyberattacks are rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated. It is possible that computer hackers and others might compromise our security measures, or security measures of those parties that we do business with now or in the future, and obtain the personal information of our customers, employees and suppliers or our business information. A security breach of any kind, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses and attacks by hackers, employees or others, could expose us to risks of data loss, litigation, government enforcement actions, regulatory penalties and costly response measures, and could seriously disrupt our operations. Any resulting negative publicity could significantly harm our reputation, which could cause us to lose market share and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

If we fail to retain key members of management, or successfully integrate new executives, our business may be materially harmed.

Our future success depends, in substantial part, on the efforts and abilities of our current management team. If certain of these individuals were to leave unexpectedly, we could experience substantial loss of institutional knowledge, face difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains the necessary training and experience. Our loss of services of any of our senior executives, or any failure to effectively integrate new management into our business processes, controls, systems and culture, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have made changes to our management team in recent years. On November 24, 2015, the Board of Directors appointed D. Kyle Cerminara as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Cerminara has been a member of the Board since February 2015 and has served as its Chairman since May 2015, assuming the role of Executive Chairman in September 2015. On November 2, 2015, Ray F. Boegner was promoted to the newly created position of President of the Strong Cinema business. On November 16, 2018, Mark D. Roberson was appointed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. These or other changes in key management could create uncertainty among our employees, suppliers and other business partners and are resulting in changes to the strategic direction of our business, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our previous and any potential future acquisitions, strategic investments, entry into new lines of business, divestitures, mergers or joint ventures may subject us to significant risks, any of which could harm our business.

Our long-term strategy may include identifying and acquiring, investing in or merging with suitable candidates on acceptable terms, entry into new lines of business and markets or divesting of certain business lines or activities. In particular, over time, we may acquire, make investments in or merge with providers of product offerings that complement our business or may terminate such activities. Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and entries into new lines of business include a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including but not limited to:

diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
   
 Willingness to ask tough questionspossible material weaknesses in a constructive manner that adds to the decision making process of the Board;internal control over financial reporting;
   
 Demonstrated abilityincreased expenses including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to think strategically and make decisions with a forward looking focus;newly hired or terminated employees;
   
 Abilityincreased costs to assimilate relevant information onintegrate, develop or, in the case of a broad rangedivestiture, separate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of topics;the acquired, new or divested business or assets;

potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process;
   
 Willingnesspotential adverse effects on reported operating results due to express independent thought;possible write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions;
   
 Team player;
Willingnesspotential damage to make a strong commitmentcustomer relationships or loss of time and attention tosynergies in the Board’s processes and affairs;case of divestitures; and
   
 Abilityunavailability of acquisition financing or inability to commit to Company stock ownership.obtain such financing on reasonable terms.

 

The NominatingAny acquired business, technology, service or product or entry into a new line of business could significantly under-perform relative to our expectations, and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider proposals for nominees for directormay not achieve the benefits we expect. For example, our entry into the Strong Outdoor line of business in 2018 poses many of the risks discussed above. For all these reasons, our pursuit of an acquisition, investment, new line of business, divestiture, merger or joint venture could cause our actual results to differ materially from stockholdersthose anticipated.

Failure to effectively utilize or successfully assert intellectual property rights could negatively impact us.

We own or otherwise have rights to various trademarks and trade names used in conjunction with the sale of our products, the most significant of which are madeStrong® and Convergent™. We rely on trademark laws to protect these intellectual property rights. We cannot assure that these intellectual property rights will be effectively utilized or, if necessary, successfully asserted. There is a risk that we will not be able to obtain and perfect our own intellectual property rights, or, where appropriate, license from others, intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. Our intellectual property rights, and any additional rights we may obtain in writingthe future, may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the future. Our failure to perfect or successfully assert intellectual property rights could harm our competitive position and could negatively impact us.

Natural disasters and other catastrophic events beyond our control could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.

The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as fires, hurricanes, tornados, tsunamis, floods and earthquakes; geo-political events, such as civil unrest in a country in which our suppliers are located or terrorist or military activities disrupting transportation, communication or utility systems; or other highly disruptive events, such as nuclear accidents, pandemics, unusual weather conditions or cyberattacks, could adversely affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result, among other things, in operational disruptions, physical damage to or destruction or disruption of one or more of our properties or properties used by third parties in connection with the Corporate Secretarysupply of products or services to us, the lack of an adequate workforce in parts or all of our operations and communications and transportation disruptions. These factors could also cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and global financial markets and economy. Such occurrences could have a material adverse effect on us and could also have indirect consequences such as increases in the costs of insurance if they result in significant loss of property or other insurable damage.

The insurance that we maintain may not fully cover all potential exposures.

We maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the hazards of our business and is subject to limitations, including deductibles and maximum liabilities covered. We are potentially at risk if one or more of our insurance carriers fail. Additionally, severe disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some insurers. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.

Entities affiliated with Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, whose interests may differ from the interests of our other stockholders, have significant influence over the Company.

The interests of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC and its affiliates may differ from the interests of our other stockholders. Fundamental Global Investors, LLC and its affiliates hold approximately 36.1% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Cerminara, the Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, serves as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, Lewis M. Johnson, the President, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, serves as a member of our board of directors. As a result of its ownership position and Mr. Cerminara’s and Mr. Johnson’s positions with the Company, Fundamental Global Investors, LLC has the ability to exert significant influence over our policies and affairs, including the power to impact the election of our directors, appointment of our management and approval of any action requiring a shareholder vote, such as amendments to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, significant stock issuances, mergers and asset sales. Fundamental Global Investors, LLC may have interests that differ from those of our other stockholders and may vote in a way with which our other stockholders disagree and which may be adverse to their interests. Fundamental Global Investors, LLC’s significant ownership may also have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of the Company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the Company and complymight ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

Our stock price is vulnerable to significant fluctuations.

The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile in the past and could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly operating results, general conditions in the industries in which we operate and other factors. In addition, the stock market is subject to price and volume fluctuations affecting the market price for the stock of many companies generally, which fluctuations often are unrelated to operating performance.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

Our headquarters are located at 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Omaha, Nebraska, where we lease office space. The premises are used for offices supporting our operating segments and operating the Omaha NOC. The lease expires in November 2021. In addition, we and our subsidiaries owned or leased the following facilities as of December 31, 2018:

Our Strong/MDI Screen Systems, Inc. subsidiary owns an 83,000 square-foot manufacturing plant in Joliette, Quebec, Canada. The facility is used for offices, manufacturing, assembly and distribution of the cinema and other screens. We believe this facility is well maintained and adequate for future needs.
The Company leases office space in Mooresville, North Carolina. The lease expires in November of 2020.
We lease a 43,000 square-foot office facility in Alpharetta, Georgia, which is primarily used by our Convergent business, under a lease expiring in June 2028. The facility is used for offices and operating the Alpharetta NOC. In addition, Convergent leases an office facility in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, under a lease expiring in October 2019. We believe these facilities are adequate for future needs and are used by both of our operating segments.
In January 2019, Strong Digital Media entered into a lease expiring in January 2022 for a floor of an office building located in Manhattan, New York. The lease contains an option to renew for an additional 2-year period at the end of the initial term.

We do not anticipate any difficulty in retaining occupancy of any leased facilities, either by renewing leases prior to expiration or replacing them with Bylawequivalent leased facilities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of our business operations, we are involved, from time to time, in certain legal disputes. No such disputes, individually or in the aggregate, are expected to have a material effect on our business or financial condition.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “BTN.”

According to the records of our transfer agent, we had 114 stockholders of record of our common stock on March 1, 2019. Because brokers and other institutions hold many of our shares on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

Stock Repurchases

On August 20, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to 700,000 shares of our outstanding common stock pursuant to a plan adopted under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended). The program has no expiration date. There were no repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2018. As of December 31, 2018, there were 636,931 shares that may yet be purchased under the stock repurchase program.

Dividend Policy

We intend to retain our earnings to assist in financing our business and making investments and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends by the Company are also subject to the discretion of the Board. Any determination by the Board as to the payment of dividends in the future will depend upon, among other things, business conditions, our financial condition and capital requirements, as well as any other factors deemed relevant by the Board. We have not paid cash dividends since we went public in 1995.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable as we are a “smaller reporting company.”

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Management’s discussion and analysis contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company performance. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item 1A. Given the risks and uncertainties, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein, as well as others not now anticipated. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company conducts its operations through three operating segments: Strong Cinema, Convergent and Strong Outdoor. Our Strong Cinema business is one of the largest manufacturers of premium projection screens. We also manufacture customized screen support systems, distribute other products and provide technical support services to the cinema, amusement park and other markets. Convergent delivers digital signage solutions and related services to large multi-location organizations in the United States and Canada. Strong Outdoor provides outdoor advertising and experiential marketing to corporate customers. Strong Outdoor started operations in the second half of 2018 and began selling advertising on its approximately 3,500 taxi cab signs in New York City, with plans to ramp operations, enter other markets and begin its experiential marketing operations in 2019.

Results of Operations:

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of net revenues represented by certain items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.

  Years ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Net revenues  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of revenues  81.2   73.9 
Gross profit  18.8   26.1 
Selling and administrative expenses  31.5   29.6 
Loss from operations  (16.0)  (3.9)
Net loss from continuing operations  (19.1)  (4.9)

2018 Compared to 2017

Revenues

Net revenues during 2018 decreased 11.0% to $64.7 million from $72.6 million in 2017. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to reductions in our Strong Cinema and Convergent businesses where we stopped selling certain lower-margin product lines, partially offset by new revenue from the start-up of business at Strong Outdoor.

  2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Strong Cinema $44,361  $48,938  $(4,577)  (9.4)%
Convergent  17,210   24,348   (7,138)  (29.3)%
Strong Outdoor  3,632   -   3,632   N/A 
Other  308   175   133   76.0%
Total segment net revenues  65,511   73,461   (7,950)  (10.8)%
Eliminations  (822)  (815)  (7)  0.9%
Total net revenues $64,689  $72,646  $(7,957)  (11.0)%

Sales of Strong Cinema products and services decreased primarily due to changes in product mix in our screen business and the decision to exit certain lower margin product lines. During July 2017, we ceased distributing certain lower-margin lamp products, resulting in a $3.0 million reduction in cinema revenue year over year. In addition, revenue from screens decreased $1.9 million due to changes in product mix as cinemas in the United States installed fewer 3D screens, which carry a higher price per unit than 2D screens. Those decreases were partially offset by increased sales of screen support structures, installation services and other products.

Sales of Convergent products and services decreased as we pivoted the business to standardize on Linux-based hardware and moved more of the business to a recurring revenue DSaaS model. Declines in revenue from the loss of several large customers in 2017 were partially offset by growth in revenue from new enterprise DSaaS customers in the second half of 2018.

Strong Outdoor was a start-up business that began producing advertising revenue in mid-2018. Revenue from advertising services in 2018 amounted to $3.6 million and consisted of $2.6 million from traditional vinyl taxicab tops and $0.8 million from digital taxicab tops.

Gross Profit

Consolidated gross profit decreased 35.7% to $12.2 million in 2018 from $18.9 million in 2017 and, as a percentage of total revenues, decreased to 18.8% in 2018 from 26.1% in 2017.

  2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
Strong Cinema $14,710  $14,919  $(209)  (1.4)%
Convergent  2,061   3,840   (1,779)  (46.3)%
Strong Outdoor  (4,843)  -   (4,843)  N/A 
Other  308   175   133   76.0%
Total segment gross profit  12,236   18,934   (6,698)  (35.4)%
Eliminations  (57)  -   (57)  N/A 
Total gross profit $12,179  $18,934  $(6,755)  (35.7)%

Gross profit in the Strong Cinema segment was $14.7 million or 33.2% of revenues in 2018 compared to $14.9 million or 30.5% of revenues in 2017. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue is due primarily to a shift in product mix as 2018 represents a full year with decreased sales of our lower margin lamps, which favorably impacted gross profit as a percent of revenue. In addition, we reduced certain indirect costs of revenues by relocating to a smaller, lower cost warehouse facility.

Gross profit for Convergent was $2.1 million or 12.0% of revenues in 2018 compared to $3.8 million or 15.8% of revenues in 2017, due to unfavorable absorption of fixed operating costs on lower revenues.

Gross loss for Strong Outdoor was $4.8 million in 2018 as we incurred costs of operation during most of the year, but did not begin generating significant revenues until the second half of 2018.

Operating Loss

We generated an operating loss of $10.3 million in 2018 compared to an operating loss of $2.8 million in 2017.

  2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
Strong Cinema $10,407  $10,678  $(271)  (2.5)%
Convergent  (4,483)  (3,944)  (539)  13.7%
Strong Outdoor  (6,070)  -   (6,070)  N/A 
Other  (309)  (340)  31   (9.1)%
Total segment operating (loss) income  (455)  6,394   (6,849)  (107.1)%
Unallocated general and administrative expenses  (9,076)  (9,208)  132   (1.4)%
Unallocated loss on disposal of assets  (818)  -   (818)  N/A 
Total operating loss $(10,349) $(2,814) $(7,535)  267.8%

Strong Cinema generated operating income of $10.4 million in 2018 compared to $10.7 million in 2017, generally consistent with prior year performance. Reductions in revenue noted above from reduced sales of lower margin products were accompanied by reduced operating costs, increasing operating income as a percent of revenue to 23.5% in 2018 from 21.8% in 2017.

Convergent generated an operating loss of $4.5 million in 2018 compared to $3.9 million in 2017. We restructured Convergent’s operations in 2018 to reduce operating costs, eliminate low/negative margin products, and to invest in growing our higher margin recurring revenue business lines. In connection with those efforts, we incurred non-cash impairment charges of approximately $1.5 million in 2018. The actions taken to restructure operations at Convergent negatively impacted full year results, with improvements in recurring revenue and profitability starting in the latter part of 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2018, Convergent delivered its first profitable quarter, and we expect this business to continue to improve in 2019 on lower operating costs and increasing high margin recurring revenue.

Strong Outdoor generated an operating loss of $6.1 million in 2018. Strong Outdoor started operations in 2018, incurring startup operating costs for the majority of the year while revenues were not significant until the second half of 2018. We expect Strong Outdoor to continue to generate operating losses in 2019 as monthly expenses are expected to exceed revenues; however, we expect operating losses to improve over the course of 2019 as we increase advertising sales.

Unallocated general and administrative expenses amounted to $9.1 million in 2018 compared to $9.2 million in 2017. Decreases in consulting expenses were partially offset by increased personnel-related and legal costs.

Other Financial Items

In 2018, total other income of $1.0 million consisted of a $1.2 million fair value adjustment to our notes receivable and $0.3 million of foreign currency transaction gains, partially offset by $0.4 million of interest expense. Interest expense increased due to higher average borrowings outstanding in 2018 compared to 2017. In 2017, total other income of $0.7 million primarily consisted of a $1.1 million fair value adjustment to our notes receivable, partially offset by $0.3 million of foreign currency transaction losses and $0.2 million of net interest expense.

Income tax expense was approximately $2.4 million in 2018 compared to $3.4 million in 2017. Our income tax expense consists primarily of income tax on foreign earnings.

We recorded an equity method investment loss of $0.6 million in 2018, consisting of other-than-temporary impairment charges of $0.7 million and equity method investment loss of $0.5 million from Itasca and an equity method investment loss of $0.4 million from BKTI, partially offset by equity method investment income of $0.2 million from PIH and a gain on the sale of BKTI common stock of $0.8 million. Equity method investment income in 2017 was $2.0 million, consisting primarily of $2.1 million of income from our investment in Itasca.

As a result of the items outlined above, we recorded a net loss of $12.3 million, or $0.86 basic and diluted losses per share, in 2018, compared to a net loss of $3.6 million, or $0.25 basic and diluted losses per share, in 2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the past several years, we have primarily met our working capital and capital resource needs from our operating cash flows and credit facilities. We incurred operating losses and negative operating cash flow in our Convergent business for the first three quarters of 2018, as we executed our plans to restructure that business to reduce operating costs and invest in higher margin recurring revenue. The startup of Strong Outdoor negatively impacted our cash flow by approximately $8.9 million. Our Strong Cinema segment provides a relatively strong and stable source of operating cash flow, with approximately $12.6 million in 2018. Cash flow from Strong Cinema was used to fund operating expenses and startup costs in our other lines of business during 2018. In addition, we entered into a sale/leaseback transaction resulting in net proceeds of $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2018 and monetized our equity investment in BKTI for $4.5 million in the third quarter of 2018. We also financed approximately $5.3 million of media players and related equipment for our Convergent subsidiary under a combination of term loans and capital leases in 2018.

We ended 2018 with total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $7.0 million compared to $4.9 million at December 31, 2017. Of the $7.0 million as of December 31, 2018, $2.4 million was held by our Canadian subsidiary, Strong/MDI and $0.4 million was restricted. Strong/MDI also makes intercompany loans to the U.S. parent company which do not trigger Canadian withholding taxes if they meet certain requirements. As of December 31, 2018, the parent company had outstanding intercompany loans from Strong/MDI of approximately $30.8 million. In the event those loans are not repaid, or are recharacterized as dividends to the U.S. parent company, we would be required to pay Canadian withholding taxes, which have been fully accrued as of December 31, 2018.

On May 22, 2018, our subsidiary, Convergent, entered into an installment payment agreement with an equipment financing company in order to purchase media players and related equipment in an aggregate amount of up to approximately $4.4 million. Installment payments under each contract for purchase of the equipment are due monthly for a period of 60 months. The recommendation must containfinancing provided in the agreement is secured by the equipment. The borrowings under the agreement bear interest at a fixed rate based on the three-year U.S. Treasury Note yield plus a spread at the time of funding. In December 2018, Convergent entered into additional installment payment agreements with other financing companies in order to purchase additional media players and related equipment. This round of financing totaled approximately $0.6 million. Installment payments under each contract are due monthly for a period of 60 months. The financing under the agreements is secured by the equipment. The borrowings under the agreements are recorded as long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet. Collectively, we had $4.4 million of outstanding borrowings under equipment term loan agreements at December 31, 2018, which bear interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 6.8%.

On June 29, 2018, Convergent completed a sale-leaseback of its Alpharetta, Georgia office facility. Convergent sold the Alpharetta facility for $7.0 million in cash and we entered into a 10-year leaseback of the facility for rent in the amount of $600,000 per year, escalating at the rate of 2% per year. Due to our continuing involvement in the building, the transaction was accounted for as a financing rather than a normal leaseback. Upon closing, Convergent’s term loan and revolving line of credit that previously were secured by the Alpharetta facility were repaid, and the related debt agreement was terminated.

In 2017, our Canadian subsidiary, Strong/MDI, entered into a demand credit agreement consisting of a revolving line of credit for up to CDN$3.5 million subject to a borrowing base requirement, a 20-year installment loan for up to CDN$6.0 million and a 5-year installment loan for up to CDN$500,000. The Strong/MDI credit facilities are secured by a lien on Strong/MDI’s Quebec, Canada facility and substantially all of Strong/MDI’s assets. Strong/MDI borrowed CDN$4.5 million on the 20-year installment loan during 2018. There was CDN$4.3 million of principal outstanding on the 20-year installment loan as of December 31, 2018. The outstanding principal bears variable interest based on the lender’s prime rate plus 0.5%, which equaled 4.53% on December 31, 2018. Strong/MDI was in compliance with its debt covenants as of December 31, 2018.

We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents, operating cash flow, credit facilities, equity investments, receivables and other assets will be sufficient background information concerningto meet our projected capital needs for the nomineeforeseeable future.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $7.2 million for 2018 as compared with $0.1 million for 2017. As discussed above, our Strong Cinema business generated positive operating income and cash flows from operations, which we used to enableinvest in the startup of Strong Outdoor and to support the turnaround and restructuring of our Convergent business, as well as to cover general and administrative expenses.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $2.6 million in 2018, consisting primarily of $4.5 million of proceeds from our sale of BKTI common stock, partially offset by $2.0 million of capital expenditures. Net cash used in investing activities was $5.4 million for 2017, primarily due to $2.5 million used in purchases of equity securities and $3.3 million of capital expenditures.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.1 million in 2018, consisting primarily of $7.0 million of proceeds from the sale-leaseback of our Alpharetta, GA office facility and $4.0 million of proceeds from issuance of short-term debt, partially offset by $3.6 million of principal payments on debt, including repayment in conjunction with the sale-leaseback of approximately $2.9 million of debt previously secured by the Alpharetta, GA facility. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2017 was $2.1 million, primarily due to $2.5 million of proceeds from issuance of debt, offset slightly by $0.1 million of treasury stock purchases and $0.2 million of capital lease payments.

Financial Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations

Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 46% of 2018 consolidated net revenues, including one Strong Cinema customer that individually accounted for 14% of 2018 consolidated net revenues. Trade accounts receivable from our top ten customers represented approximately 45% of net consolidated receivables at December 31, 2018. While we believe our relationships with such customers are stable, most arrangements are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from our significant customers could have a proper judgmentmaterial adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which we sell our products.

Financial instruments that potentially expose us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of accounts receivable and notes receivable. We sell products to a large number of customers in many different geographic regions. To minimize credit concentration risk, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition or use letters of credit.

Hedging and Trading Activities

Our primary exposure to foreign currency fluctuations pertains to our operations in Canada. In certain instances, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts to manage a portion of this risk. We do not have any trading activities that include non-exchange traded contracts at fair value.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our off balance sheet arrangements consist principally of leasing equipment and facilities under operating leases.

Inflation

We believe that the relatively moderate rates of inflation in recent years have not had a significant impact on our net revenues or profitability. Historically, we have been able to offset any inflationary effects by either increasing prices or improving cost efficiencies.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements for a description of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

General

The following accounting policies involve judgments and estimates used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements.

Our accounting policies are discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in this report. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASC 606”) using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. Results for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to hisbe reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period.

Under ASC 606, we account for revenue using the following steps:

Identify the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
Determine the transaction price;
Allocate the transaction price to the identified performance obligations; and
Recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies the performance obligations.

We combine contracts with the same customer into a single contract for accounting purposes when the contracts are entered into at or her qualifications. Recommendations must also includenear the same time and the contracts are negotiated as a written statementsingle commercial package, consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the services are considered a single performance obligation. If an arrangement involves multiple performance obligations, the items are analyzed to determine the separate units of accounting, whether the items have value on a standalone basis and whether there is objective and reliable evidence of their standalone selling price. The total contract transaction price is allocated to the identified performance obligations based upon the relative standalone selling prices of the performance obligations. The standalone selling price is based on an observable price for services sold to other comparable customers, when available, or an estimated selling price using a cost plus margin approach. We estimate the amount of total contract consideration we expect to receive for variable arrangements by determining the most likely amount we expect to earn from the candidate expressingarrangement based on the expected quantities of services we expect to provide and the contractual pricing based on those quantities. We only include some or a willingnessportion of variable consideration in the transaction price when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. We consider the sensitivity of the estimate, its relationship and experience with the client and variable services being performed, the range of possible revenue amounts and the magnitude of the variable consideration to serve.the overall arrangement.

As discussed in more detail in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. We do not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Observable prices are used to determine the standalone selling price of separate performance obligations, or a cost plus margin approach is used when observable prices are not available. Sales, value-added and other taxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. Our policy is to evaluate all inventory quantities for amounts on-hand that are potentially in excess of estimated usage requirements, and to write down any excess quantities to estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable values are management’s estimates related to customer demand and the development of new technology, which could make our theater and digital media products obsolete, among other items.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. We use an estimate of our annual effective rate at each interim period based on the facts and circumstances at the time while the actual effective rate is calculated at year-end. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A cumulative loss in a particular tax jurisdiction in recent years is a significant piece of evidence with respect to the realizability that is difficult to overcome. Based on the available objective evidence, including recent updates to the taxing jurisdictions generating income, the Company concluded that the valuation allowance recorded against the Company’s U.S. tax jurisdiction deferred tax assets is appropriate as of December 31, 2018.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable as we are a “smaller reporting company.”

 

 924 
 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page No.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – BDO USA, LLP26
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2018 and 201727
Consolidated Statements of Operations—Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201728
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss—Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201729
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201730
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201731
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201733

25

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERSReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Ballantyne Strong, Inc.

Omaha, Nebraska

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 12, 2019

26

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except par values)

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $6,698  $4,870 
Restricted cash  350   - 
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,832 and $1,877 respectively)  13,841   10,766 
Inventories, net  3,490   4,821 
Recoverable income taxes  281   495 
Other current assets  1,663   1,290 
Total current assets  26,323   22,242 
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $9,561 and $8,780 respectively)  15,175   10,826 
Equity method investments  11,167   18,053 
Intangible assets, net  1,795   3,972 
Goodwill  875   952 
Notes receivable  3,965   2,815 
Other assets  337   154 
Total assets $59,637  $59,014 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $4,724  $3,425 
Accrued expenses  2,782   2,882 
Short-term debt  3,152   500 
Current portion of long-term debt  1,094   65 
Current portion of capital lease obligations  160   189 
Deferred revenue and customer deposits  2,310   1,619 
Total current liabilities  14,222   8,680 
Long-term debt, net of current portion and debt issuance costs  10,053   1,870 
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion  427   113 
Deferred revenue and customer deposits, net of current portion  1,167   1,207 
Deferred income taxes  2,516   2,816 
Other accrued expenses, net of current portion  254   206 
Total liabilities  28,639   14,892 
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 1,000 shares, none outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 25,000 shares; issued 17,237 and 17,216 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively; outstanding 14,443 and 14,422 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively  169   169 
Additional paid-in capital  41,474   40,565 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):        
Foreign currency translation  (5,308)  (4,048)
Postretirement benefit obligations  125   99 
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities of equity method investment  (195)  353 
Retained earnings  13,319   25,570 
   49,584   62,708 
Less 2,794 of common shares in treasury, at cost  (18,586)  (18,586)
Total stockholders’ equity  30,998   44,122 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $59,637  $59,014 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

27

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Net product sales $34,378  $47,544 
Net service revenues  30,311   25,102 
Total net revenues  64,689   72,646 
Cost of products sold  29,116   35,446 
Cost of services  23,394   18,266 
Total cost of revenues  52,510   53,712 
Gross profit  12,179   18,934 
Selling and administrative expenses:        
Selling  4,806   5,417 
Administrative  15,587   16,121 
Total selling and administrative expenses  20,393   21,538 
Loss on disposal of assets  (2,135)  (210)
Loss from operations  (10,349)  (2,814)
Other income (expense):        
Interest income  -   9 
Interest expense  (447)  (153)
Fair value adjustment to notes receivable  1,150   1,146 
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  333   (304)
Other expense, net  (35)  (16)
Total other income  1,001   682 
Loss before income taxes and equity method investment income  (9,348)  (2,132)
Income tax expense  2,427   3,418 
Equity method investment (loss) income  (552)  1,958 
Net loss from continuing operations  (12,327)  (3,592)
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (25)
Net loss $(12,327) $(3,617)
Net loss earnings per share - basic        
Net loss from continuing operations $(0.86) $(0.25)
Net loss from discontinued operations  -   (0.00)
Net loss  (0.86)  (0.25)
Net loss per share - diluted        
Net loss from continuing operations $(0.86) $(0.25)
Net loss from discontinued operations  -   (0.00)
Net loss  (0.86)  (0.25)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income

(In thousands)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Net loss $(12,327) $(3,617)
Adjustment to postretirement benefit obligation        
Prior service credit  (24)  (24)
Net actuarial gain  50   26 
Total adjustment to postretirement benefit obligation  26   2 
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities of equity method investments, net of tax  (226)  217 
Reclassification adjustment for sale of equity method investment  (322)  - 
Currency translation adjustment:        
Unrealized net change arising during period  (1,260)  1,661 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income  (1,782)  1,880 
Comprehensive loss $(14,109) $(1,737)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

29

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

($ and shares in thousands)

  Common Stock  Additional Paid-In Capital  Retained Earnings  Treasury Stock  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  

Total

Stockholders’ Equity

 
Balance at December 31, 2016 $169  $39,758  $29,187  $(18,484) $(5,476) $45,154 
Net loss  -   -   (3,617)  -   -   (3,617)
Net other comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   1,880   1,880 
Treasury share purchase of 15 shares  -   -   -   (102)  -   (102)
Stock-based compensation expense  -   736   -   -   -   736 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  -   71   -   -   -   71 
Balance at December 31, 2017  169   40,565   25,570   (18,586)  (3,596)  44,122 
Net loss  -   -   (12,327)  -   -   (12,327)
Net other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   -   (1,782)  (1,782)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 606  -   -   76   -   -   76 
Issuance of warrants to purchase 100 shares of common stock, net of issuance costs  -   72   -   -   -   72 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   837   -   -   -   837 
Balance at December 31, 2018 $169  $41,474  $13,319  $(18,586) $(5,378) $30,998 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

30

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(12,327) $(3,617)
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (25)
Net loss from continuing operations  (12,327)  (3,592)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities:        
Provision for doubtful accounts  188   822 
Provision for obsolete inventory  170   347 
Provision for warranty  208   295 
Depreciation and amortization  2,712   2,140 
Impairment of intangible assets  -   41 
Fair value adjustment to notes receivable  (1,150)  (1,146)
Equity method investment loss (income)  552   (1,958)
Recognition of contract acquisition costs  29   - 
Impairment of contract acquisition costs  59   - 
Loss on disposal of assets  2,135   210 
Deferred income taxes  (250)  1,062 
Stock-based compensation expense  837   736 
Dividends received from investee  813   - 
Impairment of operating lease  209   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (3,540)  4,887 
Inventories  1,020   1,508 
Other current assets  (445)  300 
Accounts payable  1,399   (1,687)
Accrued expenses  (391)  (1,371)
Deferred revenue and customer deposits  682   (2,630)
Current income taxes  192   96 
Other assets  (327)  (50)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities - continuing operations  (7,225)  10 
Net cash flows used in operating activities - discontinued operations  -   (123)
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,225)  (113)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Proceeds from sale of equity securities  4,531   - 
Dividends received from investee in excess of cumulative earnings  69   253 
Capital expenditures  (1,984)  (3,275)
Purchase of equity securities  -   (2,525)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities - continuing operations  2,616   (5,547)
Net cash flows provided by investing activities - discontinued operations  -   134 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  2,616   (5,413)

(Continued on following page)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – (Continued)

(In thousands)

Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing $7,000  $- 
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt  -   2,000 
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt  3,963   500 
Principal payments on short-term debt  (1,154)  - 
Principal payments on long-term debt  (2,476)  (33)
Payment of debt issuance costs  (22)  (49)
Payment of costs attributable to issuance of equity contract  (8)  - 
Purchase of treasury stock  -   (102)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  -   71 
Payments on capital lease obligations  (230)  (240)
Net cash provided by financing activities  7,073   2,147 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents - continuing operations  (286)  478 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash  2,178   (2,901)
Discontinued operations activity included above:        
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at beginning of period  -   175 
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at end of period  -   - 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period  4,870   7,596 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $7,048  $4,870 
Components of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash:        
Cash and cash equivalents $6,698  $4,870 
Restricted cash  350   - 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $7,048  $4,870 
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:        
Interest $401  $152 
Income taxes $2,620  $2,830 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Term loan borrowings to finance equipment purchases $4,761  $- 
Capital lease obligations for property and equipment $515  $- 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Basis of Presentation

Business Description

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (“Ballantyne” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with diverse business activities focused on serving the cinema, retail, financial, advertising and government markets. The Company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries Strong Technical Services, Inc., Strong/MDI Screen Systems, Inc. (“Strong/MDI”), Convergent Media Systems Corporation and Strong Digital Media, LLC design, integrate and install technology solutions for a broad range of applications; develop and deliver out-of-home messaging, advertising and communications; manufacture projection screens; and provide managed services including monitoring of networked equipment to our customers.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority owned and controlled domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Management Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results and changes in facts and circumstances may alter such estimates and affect results of operations and financial position in future periods.

2. Discontinued Operations

In May 2017, the Company sold the operational assets of Strong Westrex, Inc. for total proceeds of $60 thousand. The summary financial results of discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

  

Year ended

December 31, 2017

 
    
Total net revenues $24 
Total cost of revenues  48 
Total selling and administrative expenses  53 
Loss from operations of discontinued operations  (77)
Loss before income taxes  (25)
Income tax expense (benefit)  - 
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax $(25)

There was no depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no capital expenditures related to discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2017.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASC 606”) using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. Results for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period.

Under ASC 606, the Company accounts for revenue using the following steps:

Identify the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
Determine the transaction price;
Allocate the transaction price to the identified performance obligations; and
Recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies the performance obligations.

The Company combines contracts with the same customer into a single contract for accounting purposes when the contracts are entered into at or near the same time and the contracts are negotiated as a single commercial package, consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the services are considered a single performance obligation. If an arrangement involves multiple performance obligations, the items are analyzed to determine the separate units of accounting, whether the items have value on a standalone basis and whether there is objective and reliable evidence of their standalone selling price. The total contract transaction price is allocated to the identified performance obligations based upon the relative standalone selling prices of the performance obligations. The standalone selling price is based on an observable price for services sold to other comparable customers, when available, or an estimated selling price using a cost plus margin approach. The Company estimates the amount of total contract consideration it expects to receive for variable arrangements by determining the most likely amount it expects to earn from the arrangement based on the expected quantities of services it expects to provide and the contractual pricing based on those quantities. The Company only includes some or a portion of variable consideration in the transaction price when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company considers the sensitivity of the estimate, its relationship and experience with the client and variable services being performed, the range of possible revenue amounts and the magnitude of the variable consideration to the overall arrangement.

As discussed in more detail below, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. The Company does not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Observable prices are used to determine the standalone selling price of separate performance obligations, or a cost plus margin approach is used when observable prices are not available. Sales, value-added and other taxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

The Company recognizes contract assets or unbilled receivables related to revenue recognized for services completed but not yet invoiced to the clients. Unbilled receivables are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company has an unconditional right to contract consideration. A contract liability is recognized as deferred revenue when the Company receives payments from clients in advance of performing the related services under the terms of a contract. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when the Company has satisfied the related performance obligation.

Deferred contract acquisition costs are included in other assets. Beginning January 1, 2018, with the adoption of ASC 606, the Company defers costs to acquire contracts, including commissions, incentives and payroll taxes, if they are incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a customer contract with a term exceeding one year. Deferred contract costs are reported within other assets and amortized to selling expense over the contract term, which generally ranges from one to five years. The Company has elected to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a term of less than one year as a selling expense when incurred. Prior to 2018, all contract acquisition costs were expensed as incurred. The Company recorded a transition adjustment of approximately $76 thousand increasing the opening balance of retained earnings, primarily related to the deferral and amortization of direct and incremental costs of obtaining contracts. The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s contract asset balance during the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

Deferred contract acquisition costs as of January 1, 2018 $76 
Costs capitalized  12 
Amortization  (29)
Impairment  (59)
Deferred contract acquisition costs as of December 31, 2018 $- 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $59 thousand for the remaining deferred contract acquisition costs, as they are no longer considered recoverable based on the customer’s recent credit history.

The following table summarizes the impact the adoption of ASC 606 had on the Company’s consolidated financial statements (in thousands, except per share data):

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

  

As reported for the

12 months ended December 31, 2018

  Adjustments  Balances without adoption of ASC 606 
Total net revenues $64,689  $271  $64,960 
Total cost of revenues  52,510   271   52,781 
Gross profit  12,179   -   12,179 
Total selling and administrative expenses  20,393   (78)  20,315 
Loss on disposal of assets  (2,135)  -   (2,135)
Loss from operations  (10,349)  78   (10,271)
Other income  1,001   -   1,001 
Loss before income taxes and equity method investment loss  (9,348)  78   (9,270)
Income tax expense  2,427   -   2,427 
Equity method investment loss  (552)  -   (552)
Net loss $(12,327) $78  $(12,249)
Net loss per share of common stock:            
Basic $(0.86)  0.01  $(0.85)
Diluted $(0.86)  0.01  $(0.85)

The adoption of ASC 606 did not have any net impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018, or other comprehensive loss or cash flows for the year then ended.

��35

The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by major source for the year ended December, 2018 (in thousands):

  Strong Cinema  Convergent  Strong Outdoor  Other  Eliminations  Total 
Screen system sales $17,445  $-  $-  $-  $-  $17,445 
Digital equipment sales  9,956   4,110   -   -   (279)  13,787 
Field maintenance and monitoring services  11,541   8,726   -   -   (486)  19,781 
Installation services  2,055   4,356   -   -   -   6,411 
Extended warranty sales  1,041   -   -   -   -   1,041 
Advertising  -   -   3,632   -   -   3,632 
Other  2,323   18   -   308   (57)  2,592 
Total $44,361  $17,210  $3,632  $308  $(822) $64,689 

Screen system sales

The Company recognizes revenue on the sale of its screen systems when control of the screen is transferred to the customer, usually at time of shipment. However, revenue is recognized upon delivery for certain international shipments with longer shipping transit time because control does not transfer to the customer until delivery.

Digital equipment sales

The Company recognizes revenue on sales of digital equipment when the control of the equipment is transferred, which occurs at the time of shipment from the Company’s warehouse or drop-shipment from a third party. The cost of freight and shipping to the customer is recognized in cost of sales at the time of transfer of control to the customer.

Field maintenance and monitoring services

The Company sells service contracts that provide maintenance and monitoring services to Strong Cinema and Convergent customers. In the Strong Cinema segment, these contracts are generally 12 months in length, while the term for service contracts in the Convergent segment can be for multiple years. Revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement in proportion to the costs incurred in fulfilling performance obligations under the contract.

The Company also performs time and materials-based maintenance and repair work for customers in the Strong Cinema and Convergent segments. Revenue is recognized at a point in time when the performance obligation has been fully satisfied.

Installation services

The Company performs installation services for both its Strong Cinema and Convergent customers and recognizes revenue upon completion of the installations.

Extended warranty sales

The Company sells extended warranties to its Strong Cinema customers. When the Company is the primary obligor, revenue is recognized on a gross basis over the term of the extended warranty in proportion to the costs incurred in fulfilling performance obligations under the extended warranty. In third party extended warranty sales, the Company is not the primary obligor, and revenue is recognized on a net basis at the time of the sale.

Advertising

Strong Outdoor sells advertising space on top of taxicabs. Advertising revenue is recognized ratably over the contracted advertising periods.

At January 1, 2018, $0.8 million of unearned revenue associated with maintenance and monitoring services and extended warranty sales in which the Company is the primary obligor was reported in deferred revenue and customer deposits. During the year ended December 31, 2018, all of this balance was earned and recognized as revenue. At December 31, 2018, the unearned revenue amount was $1.0 million. The Company expects to recognize $0.9 million of unearned revenue amounts in 2019 and immaterial amounts each year from 2020-2022.

The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by the timing of transfer of goods or services to the customer for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

  Strong Cinema  Convergent  Strong Outdoor  Other  Eliminations  Total 
Point in time $37,456   9,565   31  $48  $(822) $46,278 
Over time  6,905   7,645   3,601   260   -   18,411 
Total $44,361  $17,210  $3,632  $308  $(822) $64,689 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All short-term, highly liquid financial instruments are classified as cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows. Generally, these instruments have maturities of three months or less from date of purchase. As of December 31, 2018, $2.4 million of the $6.7 million in cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiary.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents amounts held in a collateral account for the Company’s corporate travel and purchasing credit card program.

Equity Method Investments

We apply the equity method of accounting to investments when we have significant influence, but not controlling interest in the investee. Judgment regarding the level of influence over each equity method investment includes considering key factors such as ownership interest, representation on the board of directors, participation in policy-making decisions and material intercompany transactions. The Company’s proportionate share of the net income (loss) resulting from these investments is reported under the line item captioned “equity method investment (loss) income” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying value of our equity method investments is reported in equity method investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s equity method investments are reported at cost and adjusted each period for the Company’s share of the investee’s income or loss and dividend paid, if any. The Company’s share of the investee’s income or loss is recorded on a one quarter lag for all equity method investments. The Company classifies distributions received from equity method investments using the cumulative earnings approach on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company assesses investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an investment may not be recoverable. The Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $0.7 million related to its equity method investments during the year ended December 31, 2018 and did not record any such impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2017. Note 6 contains additional information on our equity method investments.

Accounts and Notes Receivable

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on several factors, including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience and a specific analysis that projects the ultimate collectability of the account. As such, these factors may change over time causing the allowance level and bad debt expense to be adjusted accordingly.

The Company elected the fair value option on its notes receivable. Notes receivable are recorded at estimated fair value and accrue interest at 15%.

Past due accounts are written off for accounts and notes receivable when our efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. Inventories include appropriate elements of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventory balances are net of reserves on slow moving or obsolete inventory based on management’s review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales, technological changes and product pricing.

Business Combinations

The Company uses the acquisition method of accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, the financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Significant judgment is often required in estimating the fair value of assets acquired, particularly intangible assets. As a result, in the case of significant acquisitions, the Company normally obtains the assistance of third-party valuation specialists in estimating fair values of tangible and intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on expectations and assumptions about the future, considering the perspective of marketplace participants. While management believes those expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur, which could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.

Intangible Assets

The Company evaluates its intangible assets for impairment when there is evidence that events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Significant judgments and assumptions are required in the impairment evaluations.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. The annual impairment test is performed as of December 31 each year. Significant judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. The Company may consider indicators such as deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which the reporting unit operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.

The Company may first review for goodwill impairment by assessing qualitative factors to determine whether any impairment may exist. If the Company believes, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative two-step test is required; otherwise, no further testing is required. However, the Company also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. Under the first step of the quantitative test, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, step two is not performed. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and step two of the quantitative impairment test (measurement) is performed. Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the fair value of that goodwill. The fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the fair value of the reporting unit goodwill.

Goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Peintures Elite, Inc. in 2013. A qualitative assessment was performed for the year ended December 31, 2018 and it was determined that no events had occurred since the acquisition that would indicate an impairment was more likely than not.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Significant expenditures for the replacement or expansion of property, plant and equipment are capitalized. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. For financial reporting purposes, assets are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of 20 years for buildings and improvements, the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful life for leasehold improvements, 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, 7 years for furniture and fixtures and 3 years for computers and accessories. The Company generally uses accelerated methods of depreciation for income tax purposes. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The recoverability of property, plant and equipment is based on management’s estimates of future undiscounted cash flows and these estimates may vary due to a number of factors, some of which may be outside of management’s control. To the extent that the Company is unable to achieve management’s forecasts of future income, it may become necessary to record impairment losses for any excess of the net book value of property, plant and equipment over their fair value.

The Company incurs maintenance costs on all of its major equipment. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. The Company uses an estimate of its annual effective rate at each interim period based on the facts and circumstances at the time while the actual effective rate is calculated at year-end. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing whether the deferred tax assets are realizable, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company’s uncertain tax positions are evaluated in a two-step process, whereby 1) the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and 2) for those tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold, the Company would recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The Company accrues interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as income tax expense.

Other Taxes

Sales taxes assessed by governmental authorities, including sales, use and excise taxes, are recorded on a net basis. Such taxes are excluded from revenues and are shown as a liability on the balance sheet until remitted to the appropriate taxing authorities.

Research and Development

Research and development related costs are charged to operations in the period incurred. Such costs amounted to $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Advertising Costs

Advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial and Derivative Instruments

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized into a fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1 —inputs to the valuation techniques are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 —inputs to the valuation techniques are other than quoted prices but are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly
Level 3 —inputs to the valuation techniques are unobservable for the assets or liabilities

The following tables present the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Fair values measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Cash and cash equivalents $6,698  $-  $-  $6,698 
Restricted cash  350   -   -   350 
Notes receivable  -   -   3,965   3,965 
Total $7,048  $-  $3,965  $11,013 

Fair values measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Cash and cash equivalents $4,870  $-  $-  $4,870 
Notes receivable  -   -   2,815   2,815 
Total $4,870  $-  $2,815  $7,685 

Quantitative information about the Company’s level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2018 is set forth below (dollars in thousands):

  Fair value at 12/31/18  Valuation technique Unobservable input Value 
Notes receivable $3,965  Discounted cash flow Default percentage  35%
        Discount rate  18%

During 2011, the Company entered into certain unsecured notes receivable arrangements with CDF2 Holdings, LLC pertaining to the sale and installation of digital projection equipment. The notes receivable accrue interest at a rate of 15% per annum. Interest not paid in any particular year is added to the principal and also accrues interest at 15%. The notes receivable are recorded at estimated fair value. In order to estimate the fair value, the Company reviews the financial position and estimated cash flows of the debtor of the notes receivable. The Company recorded increases to the fair value of the notes receivable of approximately $1.2 million and $1.1 million in other income in the consolidated statements of operations during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s note receivable are the discount rate and percentage of default. Significant increases (decreases) in any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance of the Company’s notes receivable at fair value (in thousands):

  2018  2017 
Notes receivable balance, beginning of period $2,815  $1,669 
Fair value adjustment  1,150   1,146 
Notes receivable balance, end of period $3,965  $2,815 

The Company’s short-term and long-term debt is recorded at historical cost. As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, had a carrying value of $11.1 million. Based on discounted cash flows using current quoted interest rates (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy), the estimated fair value at December 31, 2018 was $10.8 million.

The carrying values of all other financial assets and liabilities, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and short-term debt reported in the consolidated balance sheets equal or approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Based on quoted market prices, the market value of the Company’s equity method investments was $5.5 million at December 31, 2018 (see Note 6).

All non-financial assets that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, which include non-financial long-lived assets, are measured at fair value in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). During 2018, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $0.7 million related to its equity method investments. During 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in loss on sale or disposal of assets on the consolidated statements of operations related to groups of long-lived assets after the Company determined the carrying amount of the assets was not recoverable, and adjusted the carrying amount of the related assets to $0.

Loss Per Common Share

Basic loss per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share would be computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding after giving effect to potential common shares from dilutive stock options and certain non-vested shares of restricted stock. However, because the Company reported losses in both years presented, there were no differences between average shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share for either of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Options to purchase 645,000 and 510,000 shares of common stock were outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share as the option’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods. An additional 80,855 and 141,166 common stock equivalents related to options and restricted stock units were excluded for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, thereby decreasing the net losses per share.

Stock Compensation Plans

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. The Company uses the straight-line amortization method over the vesting period of the awards. The Company has historically issued shares upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock from new stock issuances. The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock awards based upon the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. No stock-based compensation cost was capitalized as a part of inventory in 2018 and 2017.

Post-Retirement Benefits

The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded position of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the balance sheet, measures the plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of each balance sheet date and recognizes the changes in the funded status through comprehensive income (loss) in the year in which the changes occur.

Foreign Currency Translation

For the Company’s foreign subsidiary, the environment in which the business conducts operations is considered the functional currency, generally the local currency. The assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiary are translated into the United States dollar at the foreign exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. Revenue and expenses of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated using an average of the foreign exchange rates in effect during the period. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net earnings but are presented in comprehensive loss within the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Transaction gains and losses that arise from foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the consolidated statement of operations as incurred. If the Company disposes of its investment in a foreign entity, any gain or loss on currency translation balance recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income is recognized as part of the gain or loss on disposition.

Warranty Reserves

In most instances, digital products are covered by the manufacturing firm’s warranty; however, for certain customers the Company may grant warranties in excess of the manufacturer’s warranty. In addition, the Company provides warranty coverage on screens it manufactures. The Company accrues for these costs at the time of sale. The following table summarizes warranty activity for the two years ended December 31 (in thousands):

  2018  2017 
Warranty accrual at beginning of period $521  $645 
Charged to expense  208   309 
Claims paid, net of recoveries  (349)  (462)
Foreign currency adjustment  (30)  29 
Warranty accrual at end of period $350  $521 

Contingencies

The Company accrues for contingencies when its assessments indicate that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s estimates are based on currently available facts and its estimates of the ultimate outcome or resolution. Actual results may differ from the Company’s estimates resulting in an impact, positive or negative, on earnings.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted under the equity method to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets; and modifies certain fair value disclosure requirements. The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 prospectively on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” The new guidance describes the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which was further clarified by ASU 2018-11, “Leases – Targeted Improvements,” issued in July 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-to-use asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than twelve months, on its balance sheet. This ASU is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and initially required a modified retrospective transition method under which entities would initially apply Topic 842 at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. ASU 2018-11 added an additional optional transition method allowing entities to apply Topic 842 as of the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.

The Company will adopt ASU 2016-02 using the optional transition method from ASU 2018-11 as of January 1, 2019. We have made significant progress in assessing the impact of the standards and planning for their adoption. Upon adoption, the Company expects to record a balance sheet gross-up of approximately $4.7 million to record operating lease liabilities and related right-of-use assets. In addition, the sale-leaseback of Convergent’s Alpharetta, Georgia office facility described in Note 11, which did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting under the previous lease accounting standard, qualified for sale-leaseback accounting under Topic 842, as Topic 842 eliminated the concept of continuing involvement by the seller-lessee precluding sale-leaseback accounting. The Company is completing its analysis of the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the sale-leaseback and expects to record a cumulative effect adjustment increasing retained earnings, derecognize the property and equipment related to the sale-leaseback and derecognize the sale-leaseback financing liability component of long-term debt current reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company also expects to record new operating right of use assets and liabilities for the sale-leaseback under Topic 842.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This ASU will require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets, including trade receivables, held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company believes its adoption will not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment testing which requires the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to be determined when measuring goodwill impairment. The new guidance may result in different amounts of impairment that could be recognized compared to existing guidance. In addition, failing step 1 of the impairment test may not result in impairment under existing guidance. However, under the revised guidance, failing step 1 will always result in a goodwill impairment. ASU 2017-04 is to be applied prospectively for goodwill impairment testing performed in years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe its adoption will significantly impact the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

In August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, “Disclosure Update and Simplification,” amending certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or superseded. In addition, the amendments expanded the disclosure requirements on the analysis of stockholders’ equity for interim financial statements. Under the amendments, an analysis of changes in each caption of stockholders’ equity presented in the balance sheet must be provided in a note or separate statement. The analysis should present a reconciliation of the beginning balance to the ending balance of each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed. The final rule is effective for all filings made on and after November 5, 2018. Given the effective date and proximity to most filers’ quarterly reports, the SEC is not objecting to filers deferring the presentation of changes in stockholders’ equity in their quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q until the quarter that begins after November 5, 2018. The Company’s first presentation of changes in stockholders’ equity for an interim period will be included in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Raw materials and components $1,422  $1,376 
Work in process  -   362 
Finished goods  2,068   3,083 
  $3,490  $4,821 

The inventory balances are net of reserves of approximately $1.4 million and $1.8 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

5. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment include the following (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Land $1,597  $1,601 
Buildings and improvements  9,231   9,277 
Digital signage equipment  5,252   305 
Machinery and other equipment  5,147   4,709 
Office furniture and fixtures  3,509   3,714 
Total properties, cost  24,736   19,606 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (9,561)  (8,780)
Net property, plant and equipment $15,175  $10,826 

Depreciation expense approximated $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

6. Equity Method Investments

 

The following summarizes our equity method investments (dollars in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Entity Carrying Amount  Economic Interest  Carrying Amount  Economic Interest 
1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. $7,738   17.3% $7,710   17.4%
Itasca Capital, Ltd.  3,429   32.3%  5,870   32.3%
BK Technologies, Inc.  -   0.0%  4,473   8.3%
Total $11,167      $18,053     

The following summarizes the (loss) income of equity method investees reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations (in thousands):

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Entity        
1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. $237  $(177)
Itasca Capital, Ltd.  (1,232)  2,073 
BK Technologies, Inc.  443   62 
Total $(552) $1,958 

1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“PIH”) is a listpublicly traded company that provides property and casualty insurance in the States of Louisiana, Texas and Florida. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is chairman of the namesboard of directors of PIH, and agescontrols entities that, when combined with the Company’s ownership in PIH, own greater than 20% of PIH, providing the Company with significant influence over PIH, but not controlling interest. The Company did not receive dividends from PIH in 2018 or 2017. Based on quoted market prices, the market value of the current executive officersCompany’s ownership in PIH was $4.2 million at December 31, 2018.

Itasca Capital, Ltd. (“Itasca”) is a publicly traded Canadian company that is an investment vehicle seeking transformative strategic investments. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is chairman of the Company, their business history and their termboard of officedirectors of Itasca. This board seat, combined with the Company.Company’s 32.3% ownership of Itasca, provide the Company with significant influence over Itasca, but not controlling interest. The Company received a dividend of $0.8 million from Itasca during 2018 and did not receive any dividends from Itasca during 2017. Based on quoted market prices, the market value of the Company’s ownership in Itasca was $1.3 million at December 31, 2018. A $0.7 million other-than-temporary impairment charge for Itasca is included in equity method investment loss on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Name Age Position and Principal Occupation Officer
Since
D. Kyle Cerminara 40 Director since February 2015, Chairman since May 2015 and Chief Executive Officer since November 2015. CEO, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC and Co-Chief Investment Officer of Capital Wealth Advisors. For additional information, see the section titled “Board of Directors.” 2015
       
Lance V. Schulz 50 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Served as Managing Director, Accounting for TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (Nasdaq: AMTD), a publicly traded U.S. securities broker/dealer, where he managed accounting, corporate tax and external reporting functions, from 2007 to 2016. Prior to that, he served as Director, External Reporting, for TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Schulz served as a consultant for publicly-traded and privately-held companies on finance, technical accounting and SEC financial reporting matters from 2016 until his employment with the Company. Prior to TD Ameritrade, he held positions with Werner Enterprises, Inc. (Nasdaq: WERN), a publicly traded global transportation provider of freight management and supply chain solutions, including Director of Accounting from 1996 to 2000 and Manager of Financial Reporting from 1994 to 1996. From 1990 to 1994, he was a Senior Associate at Coopers & Lybrand (now known as PricewaterhouseCoopers). Mr. Schulz holds a B.S.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Nebraska-Omaha. He is a CPA (inactive) and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Nebraska Society of Certified Public Accountants. 2017
       
Ray F. Boegner 68 President of Cinema; previously Senior Vice President and Senior Vice President of Sales; Vice President of Sales prior to November 1996; joined Company in 1985. 1997
       
Stephen L. Schilling 53 President of Digital Media. Since 2011 he has served as Managing Partner of S2 Ventures, LLC, a management consulting company that works with technology companies. From 2007 to 2011, he served as President and CEO of Cypress Communications, a provider of premium in-building broadband communications services. From 1998 to 2006, he served as President, CEO and Founder of Netfice Communications. 2015

BK Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as RELM Wireless Corporation) (“BKTI”) is a publicly traded company that designs, manufactures and markets two-way land mobile radios, repeaters, base stations and related components and subsystems. Due to the Company’s significant influence, but not controlling interest, in BKTI, the Company’s investment in BKTI was accounted for using the equity method. On September 9, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Fundamental Global Investors, LLC (“FGI”), a related party, where the Company sold 1,147,087 shares of common stock of BKTI to FGI for a price of $3.95 per share and total proceeds of approximately $4.5 million. The per share transaction price of $3.95 represented the immediately preceding closing price on the NYSE American stock exchange, and the transaction was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee, comprised of only independent directors. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of the equity method investment of $0.8 million within equity method investment income on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018. Prior to the sale of the BKTI common stock, the Company received dividends of $0.1 million and $0.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s retained earnings included undistributed earnings from equity method investees of $0.3 million.

The summarized financial information presented below reflects the aggregated financial information of all significant equity method investees as of and for the twelve months ended September 30 of each year or portion of those twelve months the Company owned its investment, consistent with the Company’s recognition of the results of its equity method investments on a one quarter lag. The summarized financial information is presented only for the periods when the Company owned its investment. Because PIH does not present a classified balance sheet, major components of its assets and liabilities are presented instead of current and noncurrent assets and liabilities.

For the twelve months ended September 30, 2018  2017 
Revenue $53,395  $72,325 
Operating income  2,738   1,021 
Net income  (462)  7,953 

As of September 30, 2018  2017 
Cash and cash equivalents - PIH $30,024  $25,679 
Investments - PIH  80,918   49,702 
Reinsurance recoverables - PIH  10,598   25,327 
Other assets - PIH  22,928   14,815 
Current assets - BKTI and Itasca  1,397   33,359 
Noncurrent assets - BKTI and Itasca  11,693   30,005 
Total assets - PIH, BKTI and Itasca $157,558  $178,887 
         
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves - PIH $14,172  $22,091 
Unearned premium reserves - PIH  49,964   32,170 
Redeemable preferred shares - PIH  -   2,744 
Other liabilities - PIH  18,651   12,920 
Current liabilities - BKTI and Itasca  98   8,857 
Noncurrent liabilities - BKTI and Itasca  82,885   452 
Total liabilities - PIH, BKTI and Itasca $165,770  $79,234 

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION7. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):

  Useful
life
  Gross  Accumulated Amortization  Net 
  (Years)          
Intangible assets not yet subject to amortization:                
Software in development     $119  $-  $119 
Intangible assets subject to amortization:                
Software in service  5   2,188   (595) $1,593 
Product formulation  10   447   (364) $83 
Total     $2,754  $(959) $1,795 

Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

  Useful
life
  Gross  Accumulated Amortization  Net 
  (Years)          
Intangible assets not yet subject to amortization:                
Software in development     $1,243  $-  $1,243 
Intangible assets subject to amortization:                
Software in service  5   3,191   (597)  2,594 
Product formulation  10   486   (351)  135 
Total     $4,920  $(948) $3,972 

Intangible assets, other than goodwill, with definite lives are amortized over their useful lives. The Company recorded amortization expense relating to intangible assets of $0.6 million during both of the years ended December 31 2018 and 2017. During 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.1 million related to abandoned software in service within loss on disposal of assets on the consolidated statements of operations.

The following table shows the Company’s estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets currently subject to amortization for the next five years (in thousands).

2019 $485 
2020  476 
2021  438 
2022  221 
2023  56 
Thereafter  - 
Total $1,676 

8. Goodwill

All of the Company’s goodwill is related to the Strong Cinema segment. The following represents a summary of changes in the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands):

Balance as of December 31, 2017 $952 
Foreign currency translation  (77)
Balance as of December 31, 2018 $875 

47

9. Accrued Expenses

The major components of current accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Employee related $1,431  $1,388 
Legal and professional fees  343   222 
Lease expenses  150   78 
Warranty obligation  350   521 
Interest and taxes  374   567 
Post-retirement benefit obligation  14   18 
Other  120   88 
Total $2,782  $2,882 

The major components of long-term accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Lease expenses $114  $109 
Post-retirement benefit obligation  140   97 
Total $254  $206 

10. Income Taxes

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes consists of (in thousands):

  2018  2017 
United States $(16,581) $(11,588)
Foreign  6,681   11,414 
  $(9,900) $(174)

Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to loss from continuing operations consists of (in thousands):

  2018  2017 
Federal:        
Current $-  $- 
Deferred  -   - 
Total  -   - 
State:        
Current  66   8 
Deferred  -   - 
Total  66   8 
Foreign:        
Current  2,609   2,348 
Deferred  (248)  1,062 
Total  2,361   3,410 
  $2,427  $3,418 

Income tax expense attributable to loss from continuing operations differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to pretax loss from continuing operations as follows (in thousands):

  2018  2017 
Expected federal income tax benefit $(2,079) $(59)
Effect of federal rate change  -   5,341 
Effect of change to territorial system  -   (4,071)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit  52   (260)
Foreign tax rate differential  381   (743)
Change in state tax rate  (139)  (67)
Change in valuation allowance  3,859   3,321 
GILTI inclusion  597   - 
Return to provision  (490)  (49)
Foreign dividend inclusion  128   - 
Other  118   5 
Total $2,427  $3,418 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the following (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Deferred tax assets:        
Deferred revenue $228  $230 
Non-deductible accruals  1,811   206 
Inventory reserves  370   451 
Stock compensation expense  325   199 
Warranty reserves  93   138 
Uncollectible receivable reserves  456   458 
Net operating losses  10,658   9,204 
Fair value adjustment to notes receivable  978   147 
Tax credits  2,084   1,642 
Depreciation and amortization  -   79 
Disallowed interest expense  394   - 
Other  129   170 
Total deferred tax assets  17,526   12,924 
Valuation allowance  (16,177)  (12,317)
Net deferred tax assets after valuation allowance  1,349   607 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Depreciation and amortization  1,601   923 
Cash repatriation  2,012   1,884 
Equity in income of equity method investments  252   610 
Other  -   6 
Total deferred tax liabilities  3,865   3,423 
Net deferred tax liability $(2,516) $(2,816)

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A cumulative loss in a particular jurisdiction in recent years is a significant piece of evidence with respect to the realizability that is difficult to overcome. Based on the available objective evidence including recent updates to the taxing jurisdictions generating income, the Company concluded that a valuation allowance of $16.2 million and $12.3 million should be recorded against the Company’s U.S. tax jurisdiction deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) was signed into law in the United States. The law includes significant changes to the United States corporate income tax system, including a federal corporate rate reduction and the transition to a territorial tax system. The 2017 Tax Act required taxpayers to calculate a one-time transition tax based on the deemed repatriation of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Company included this repatriation tax and changes to the existing deferred tax balances in the 2017 financial statements. Provisional amounts were originally recorded for the repatriation and subsequently updated through the filing of the 2017 tax return. After applying foreign tax credits, the Company calculated its transition tax liability to be zero. The Company has recorded a deferred tax liability related to withholding tax on earnings from its Canadian subsidiary of $2.0 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The decrease in the U.S. Federal corporate income tax rate resulted in a decrease in the future expected benefit of the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets. However, due to the full valuation allowance recorded against the U.S. tax jurisdiction deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017, the net income tax expense recorded related to the change in corporate tax rate was zero.

During the 2018 fiscal year, numerous provisions of the 2017 Tax Act went into effect. The Company evaluated these provisions and incorporated the estimated impact in the 2018 income tax expense. These provisions include, but are not limited to, reductions in the corporate income tax rate with regard to current income taxes, limitations with regard to interest expense that disallow a portion of interest expense that is carried forward with no future expiration, changes to the deductibility of meals and entertainment, changes to bonus depreciation and a reduced tax rate on foreign export sales.

An additional provision of the 2017 Tax Act is the implementation of the Global Intangible-Low Taxed Income Tax, or “GILTI.” The Company has elected to account for the impact of GILTI in the period in which the tax actually applies to the Company. During fiscal 2018, the Company incurred an estimated $2.8 million of additional taxable income as a result of this provision. This increase of taxable income was incorporated into the overall net operating loss and valuation allowance.

The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state tax purposes total approximately $42.8 million and $40.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018, expiring at various times in 2033 through 2037 for state net operating losses and federal losses generated through December 31, 2017. As a result of the 2017 Tax Act, all net operating losses that are generated beginning January 1, 2018 and beyond will carryforward indefinitely with no carryback. The Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $2.1 million at December 31, 2018 that expire at various times in 2024 through 2026. Utilization of these losses may be limited in the event certain changes in ownership occur.

The Company is subject to possible examinations not yet initiated for federal purposes for the fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017. In most cases, the Company is subject to possible examinations for state or local jurisdictions based on the particular jurisdiction’s statute of limitations.

Estimated amounts related to underpayment of income taxes, including interest and penalties, are classified as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations and were not material for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Amounts accrued for estimated underpayment of income taxes were zero as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

11. Debt

The Company’s long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Short-term debt:        
Strong/MDI installment loan $3,152  $- 
Revolving line of credit  -   500 
Current portion of long-term debt  1,094   65 
Total short-term debt  4,246   565 
Long-term debt:        
Sale-leaseback financing  6,769   - 
Equipment term loans  4,398   - 
Mortgage term loan  -   1,968 
Total principal balance of long-term debt  11,167   1,968 
Less: current portion  (1,094)  (65)
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs  (20)  (33)
Total long-term debt  10,053   1,870 
Total short-term and long-term debt $14,299  $2,435 

On May 22, 2018, the Company’s subsidiary, Convergent, entered into an installment payment agreement with an equipment financing company in order to purchase media players and related equipment in an aggregate amount of up to approximately $4.4 million. Installment payments under each contract for purchase of the equipment are due monthly for a period of 60 months. The financing provided in the agreement is secured by the equipment, and the obligations under the agreement are guaranteed by the Company. The borrowings under the agreement are recorded as long-term debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. In December 2018, Convergent entered into additional installment payment agreements with other financing companies in order to purchase additional media players and related equipment. This round of financing totaled approximately $0.6 million. Installment payments under each contract are due monthly for a period of 60 months. The financing under the agreements is secured by the equipment. The borrowings under the agreements are recorded as long-term debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Collectively, the Company had $4.4 million of outstanding borrowings under equipment term loan agreements at December 31, 2018, which bear interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 6.8%.

On June 29, 2018, the Company and Convergent completed a sale-leaseback of Convergent’s Alpharetta, Georgia office facility. Convergent sold the Alpharetta facility for $7.0 million in cash and the Company simultaneously entered into a 10-year leaseback of the facility for rent in the amount of $600,000 per year, escalating at the rate of 2% per year. Due to the Company’s continuing involvement in the building, the transaction was accounted for as a financing rather than a normal leaseback. The net proceeds from the transaction were recorded as a financing liability in long-term debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Upon closing, the Company’s mortgage term loan and revolving line of credit that previously were secured by the Alpharetta facility were repaid, and the related debt agreement was terminated. In addition, the Company issued warrants to the buyer to purchase up to 100,000 shares of Company stock, consisting of warrants to purchase 25,000 shares at each of $10, $12, $14, and $16 purchase prices per share. The warrants have a 10-year maturity. The Company recorded the aggregate $81 thousand fair value of the warrants as additional paid-in capital. The warrants are recorded at grant date fair value, which was calculated based on a Black-Scholes valuation model using the following assumptions:

Expected dividend yield at date of grant0.00%
Risk-free interest rate2.81%
Expected stock price volatility37.01%
Expected life of warrants (in years)7.0

On September 5, 2017, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary, Strong/MDI, entered into a demand credit agreement with a bank consisting of a revolving line of credit for up to CDN$3.5 million subject to a borrowing base requirement, a 20-year installment loan for up to CDN$6.0 million and a 5-year installment loan for up to CDN$500,000. Amounts outstanding under the line of credit are payable on demand and will bear interest at the prime rate established by the lender. Amounts outstanding under the installment loans bear interest at the prime rate plus 0.5% and are payable in monthly installments, including interest, over their respective borrowing periods. The lender may also demand repayment of the installment loans at any time. The Strong/MDI credit facilities are secured by a lien on Strong/MDI’s Quebec, Canada facility and substantially all of Strong/MDI’s assets. The credit agreement requires Strong/MDI to maintain a ratio of liabilities to “effective equity” (tangible stockholders’ equity, less amounts receivable from affiliates and equity method investments) not exceeding 2 to 1, a current ratio (excluding amounts due from related parties) of at least 1.5 to 1 and minimum “effective equity” of CDN$8.0 million. The Company borrowed CDN$4.5 million on the 20-year installment loan during 2018. There was CDN$4.3 million of principal outstanding on the 20-year installment loan as of December 31, 2018, which bears variable interest at 4.53%. Strong/MDI was in compliance with its debt covenants as of December 31, 2018.

Scheduled repayments are as follows for the Company’s long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

2019 $1,094 
2020  1,177 
2021  1,267 
2022  1,364 
2023  1,017 
Thereafter  5,248 
Total $11,167 

12. Stock Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated grant date fair values. Stock-based compensation expense included in selling and administrative expenses approximated $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (“2017 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders and provides the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors with the discretion to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards and cash-based awards. Vesting terms vary with each grant and may be subject to vesting upon a “change in control” of the Company. The total number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan is 1,371,189 shares, with 1,049,156 shares remaining available for grant at December 31, 2018.

Options

The Company granted a total of 437,500 and 435,000 options during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Options to purchase shares of common stock were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair value of the common stock on the date of the grant.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $1.72 and $2.42, respectively. The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:

  2018  2017 
Expected dividend yield at date of grant  0.00%  0.00%
Risk-free interest rate  2.53%  1.99%
Expected stock price volatility  35.93%  34.85%
Expected life of options (in years)  6.0   6.0 

The risk-free interest rate assumptions were based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected volatility was based on historical daily price changes of the Company’s stock for six years prior to the date of grant. The expected life of options is the average number of years the Company estimates that options will be outstanding.

The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2018:

  Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  930,300  $5.63   8.7  $150 
Granted  437,500   4.42         
Exercised  -   -         
Forfeited  (344,500)  5.62         
Expired  (156,300)  4.95         
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  867,000  $5.06   8.3  $- 
Exercisable at December 31, 2018  189,000  $5.08   7.3  $- 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total that would have been received by the option holders if all in-the-money options had been exercised and sold on the date indicated. No options were exercised in 2018. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $45 thousand.

As of December 31, 2018, 678,000 stock option awards were non-vested. Unrecognized compensation costs related to all stock options outstanding amounted to $1.1 million at December 31, 2018, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.

Restricted Stock

The Company awarded a total of 277,498 and 115,835 restricted stock units and restricted shares during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock awards based upon the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted shares and restricted stock units granted during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $3.33 and $6.58, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock awards that vested during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards was approximately $0.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.

The following table summarizes restricted share activity for 2018:

  Number of Restricted
Stock Shares
  Weighted Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 
Non-vested at December 31, 2017  85,000  $6.50 
Granted  -   - 
Shares vested  (28,333)  6.50 
Shares forfeited  (10,000)  6.50 
Non-vested at December 31, 2018  46,667  $6.50 

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for 2018:

  Number of Restricted
Stock Units
  Weighted Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 
Non-vested at December 31, 2017  35,835  $6.45 
Granted  277,498   3.33 
Shares vested  (35,835)  6.45 
Shares forfeited  -   - 
Non-vested at December 31, 2018  277,498  $3.33 

13. Compensation and Benefit Plans

 

ComplianceRetirement Plan

The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible employees. Pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, employees may defer up to 100% of their compensation. The Company will match 50% of the amount deferred up to 6% of their compensation. The contributions made to the Plan by the Company were approximately $0.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

14. Leases

The Company and its subsidiaries lease plant and office facilities, autos and equipment under operating leases expiring through 2022. These leases generally contain renewal options and the Company expects to renew or replace certain of these leases in the ordinary course of business. Rent expense under operating lease agreements amounted to approximately $0.9 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company also has capital leases for computer equipment and digital signage equipment, which are recorded as capital lease obligations on the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s future minimum lease payments are as follows:

  Capital Leases  Operating Leases 
  (in thousands) 
2019 $219  $1,740 
2020  139   1,537 
2021  139   1,420 
2022  139   1,081 
2023  128   - 
Thereafter  4   - 
Total minimum lease payments  768  $5,778 
Less: Amount representing interest  (181)    
Present value of minimum lease payments  587     
Less: Current maturities  (160)    
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion $427     

15. Contingencies and Concentrations

Concentrations

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 46% of 2018 consolidated net revenues, including one Strong Cinema customer that individually accounted for 14% of 2018 consolidated net revenues. Trade accounts receivable from the top ten customers represented approximately 45% of net consolidated receivables at December 31, 2018.

Litigation

The Company is involved, from time to time, in certain legal disputes in the ordinary course of business. No such disputes, individually or in the aggregate, are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s business or financial condition.

16. Business Segment Information

The Company has three primary operating segments: Strong Cinema, Convergent and Strong Outdoor. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company decided to divide its former Digital Media segment into separate Convergent and Strong Outdoor segments. All prior periods have been recast in our segment reporting to reflect the current segment organization. The Strong Cinema segment provides a full range of product and service solutions primarily for the theater exhibition industry, including a wide spectrum of premier audio-visual products and accessories such as digital projectors, state of the art projection screens, servers, library management systems, menu boards, flat panel displays, and sound systems, as well as network monitoring and on-site service for cinema equipment. The Convergent segment delivers solutions and services across two primary markets: digital out-of-home and enterprise video. While there is digital signage equipment sold within this segment, the primary focus of this segment is providing solutions and services to our customers. The Strong Outdoor segment provides taxi-top advertising services on over 3,500 New York City taxicabs.

Summary by Business Segments

  Year ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (in thousands) 
Net revenues        
Strong Cinema $44,361  $48,938 
Convergent  17,210   24,348 
Strong Outdoor  3,632   - 
Other  308   175 
Total segment net revenues  65,511   73,461 
Eliminations  (822)  (815)
Total net revenues  64,689   72,646 
         
Gross profit (loss)        
Strong Cinema  14,710   14,919 
Convergent  2,061   3,840 
Strong Outdoor  (4,843)  - 
Other  308   175 
Total segment gross profit  12,236   18,934 
Eliminations  (57)  - 
Total gross profit  12,179   18,934 
         
Operating income (loss)        
Strong Cinema  10,407   10,678 
Convergent  (4,483)  (3,944)
Strong Outdoor  (6,070)  - 
Other  (309)  (340)
Total segment operating (loss) income  (455)  6,394 
Unallocated general and administrative expenses  (9,076)  (9,208)
Unallocated loss on disposal of assets  (818)  - 
Loss from operations  (10,349)  (2,814)
Other income, net  1,001   682 
Loss before income taxes and equity method investment income $(9,348) $(2,132)

57

  Year ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (in thousands) 
Capital expenditures:        
Strong Cinema $639  $810 
Convergent  1,056   1,909 
Strong Outdoor  286   - 
Unallocated  3   556 
Total capital expenditures $1,984  $3,275 
         
Depreciation, amortization and impairment:        
Strong Cinema $892  $912 
Convergent  2,904   1,000 
Strong Outdoor  267   - 
Unallocated  1,091   269 
Total depreciation, amortization and impairment $5,154  $2,181 

  December 31, 
(In thousands)  2018   2017 
Identifiable assets        
Strong Cinema $27,009  $27,358 
Convergent  14,024   13,603 
Strong Outdoor  3,454   - 
Corporate assets  15,150   18,053 
Total $59,637  $59,014 

Summary by Geographical Area

  Year ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2018  2017 
Net revenue        
United States $51,950  $57,479 
Canada  5,055   5,535 
China  2,126   5,031 
Mexico  2,910   1,736 
Latin America  803   1,557 
Europe  1,096   681 
Asia (excluding China)  518   274 
Other  231   353 
Total $64,689  $72,646 
  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2018  2017 
Identifiable assets        
United States $42,780  $37,230 
Canada  16,857   21,784 
Total $59,637  $59,014 

Net revenues by business segment are to unaffiliated customers, except to the extent of certain revenues from intersegment services provided by the Strong Cinema segment to the Convergent segment, which are represented by the eliminations in the segment operating results table above. Identifiable assets by geographical area are based on location of facilities. Net sales by geographical area are based on destination of sales.

17. Related Party Transactions

Fundamental Global Investors, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “FGI”) hold approximately 36.1% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018. Mr. D. Kyle Cerminara, the Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, serves as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s purchases of the equity securities that comprise its equity method investments were made in companies in which FGI has an ownership interest. The independent members of the Board of Directors approved these purchases and the Company made no payments to FGI related to these purchases. On September 9, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with FGI where the Company sold 1,147,087 shares of common stock of BKTI to FGI for a price of $3.95 per share and total proceeds of approximately $4.5 million. The per share transaction price of $3.95 represented the immediately preceding closing price on the NYSE American stock exchange, and the transaction was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee, comprised of only independent directors. See Note 6 for further information on the Company’s equity method investments.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management used the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) to perform this evaluation. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting for the three months ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item will be contained in the “Board of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act,” and “Board Committees–Audit Committee” sections of the definitive proxy statement, to be filed in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Ballantyne believes that all persons subject to these reporting requirements filed the required reports on a timely basis during 2017.

Code of Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted the Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Ethics is posted on our Internet website,www.ballantynestrong.com/investors,, under the “Corporate Governance” tab, and is available free of charge, upon request to Corporate Secretary, 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68154; telephone number: (402) 453-4444.

 

Any amendment to, or waiver from, the Code of Ethics applicable to our directors and executive officers will be disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver unless the rules of the NYSE American then permit website posting of such amendments and waivers, in which case we would post such disclosures on our Internet website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

In this section of the Form 10-K/A, we discuss in detail our executive compensation program for 2017 for our Named Executive Officers (also referred to as the “NEOs”), consisting of our principal executive officer, the two individuals who each served during a portion of 2017 as our chief financial officer, and our other executive officers who were employed as of December 31, 2017. Our NEOs for 2017 are as follows:

D. Kyle Cerminara, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
Lance V. Schulz, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (since March 29, 2017);
Ryan M. Burke, former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (until March 29, 2017);
Ray F. Boegner, President of Cinema; and
Stephen L. Schilling, President of Digital Media.

Our executive compensation program is continuing to evolve, as the Company continues the transition that began in 2015, when we settled a proxy contest with Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, and our Board of Directors (which was reconstituted in connection with the settlement of the proxy contest) elected Mr. Cerminara to serve as a director and Chairman of the Board, then as Executive Chairman, and then (since November 2015) as our Chief Executive Officer. Since 2015, there have been significant changes in the composition of our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee, as well as significant changes to our senior management, including Messrs. Cerminara and Schilling joining the Company in 2015, Mr. Boegner being promoted to the newly created position of President of our Cinema business in 2015, and Mr. Schulz joining the Company to succeed Mr. Burke as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective March 29, 2017.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (this “CD&A”) describes decisions made by the Compensation Committee during 2017 with respect to our executive compensation program. However, our Board and Compensation Committee are continuing to evaluate our compensation policies and practices in light of our business and management transition, and we expect that our compensation practices will continue to evolve as the Compensation Committee reviews and refines our compensation philosophy and policies.

Compensation Philosophy

The Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions with respect to our executive officers on an individual basis based upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the provisions of any existing employment contract with an executive officer, evaluation of the executive officer’s performance, the level of responsibility associated with the executive officer’s position, recruitment requirements and the performance of the Company. Prior to making compensation decisions with respect to our executive officers, the Compensation Committee takes into account the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer and our other Board members. In determining and reviewing 2017 executive compensation, the Compensation Committee also consulted available information previously provided by Compensation Resources, Inc. (“Compensation Resources”) regarding companies of similar size and structure as well as industry data. The Compensation Committee’s key objectives in structuring our executive compensation programs are to attract and retain talented individuals who are critical to the Company’s long-term success and to align our executives’ pay with Company performance and the interests of our stockholders.

Say-on-Pay Vote

In making decisions regarding our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors have considered the results of our 2017 stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation (or “say-on-pay” vote), through which our stockholders expressed approval of our NEOs’ compensation by votes of approximately 83% of the votes cast by our stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Based on those results, the Compensation Committee concluded that it was not necessary to make any substantial revision to our executive compensation program as a result of the say-on-pay voting results. However, as noted above, the Compensation Committee continues to review and evaluate the Company’s compensation philosophy, policies and structure.

At the 2017 Annual Meeting, our stockholders also cast an advisory vote in favor of an annual frequency for future say-on-pay votes. The Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors reviewed the results of this separate advisory vote and have determined to continue to hold say-on-pay votes on an annual basis. As a result, at the 2018 Annual Meeting, our stockholders will again have the opportunity to cast a say-on-pay vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Form 10-K/A.

Elements ofItem 11. Executive Compensation

 

The Company’s current executive compensation program for our NEOs reflects a relatively uncomplicated structure, the principal elements of which are discussed below.

Base Salary

The base salaries of our executive officers are intended to reflect their individual contributions to the Company. Base salaries are reviewed annually and mayinformation required by this item will be changed based on the individual’s performance, changes in roles and responsibilities or a change in competitive pay levelscontained in the marketplace.

The Compensation Committee reviews“Executive Compensation” and establishes the base salary of all executive officers based on independent competitive data, the executives’ leadership in establishing performance standards in the conduct“Director Compensation” sections of the Company’s business, and the Compensation Committee’s expectation as to the executives’ future contributions in directing the long-term success of the Company and its business.

On February 28, 2017, in recognition of their contributions and long-term value to the Company and internal pay equity considerations, the Compensation Committee approved increases to the annual base salaries of Messrs. Cerminara and Boegner for 2017. Mr. Cerminara’s 2017 annual base salary was increased from $150,000 to $225,000 and Mr. Boegner’s 2017 annual base salary was increased from $225,000 to $275,000. The adjustments were effective as of March 1, 2017. As part of Mr. Boegner’s salary increase, his auto allowance of $1,000 per month was eliminated effective as of March 1, 2017.

Mr. Schulz’s base salary of $250,000 was negotiated as part of his employment agreement at the time of his hiring as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

The base salaries of Messrs. Burke and Schilling remained unchanged during 2017, at $170,000 and $275,000, respectively.

Discretionary Bonuses

We have used discretionary bonuses to reward the performance of our executive officers, including our NEOs, for their contributions to our overall financial and operational performance and to recognize superior performance. We have also paid bonuses to motivate our executives to continue making progress towards the Company’s strategic goals. As part of the annual performance evaluation process, the Compensation Committee determines whether any discretionary bonuses are warranted, and, if so, the amount of the bonusdefinitive proxy statement, to be granted. After considering a numberfiled in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting of factors, including CompanyStockholders, and individual performance, the Compensation Committee determined not to pay any discretionary cash bonuses to executive officers for 2017. The Compensation Committee determined to award equity grants to certain executive officers as described below.is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Long-Term Incentives

We use long-term incentive equity awards as a part of our executive compensation program, in order to incentivize and reward the achievement of longer-term strategic objectives and align the financial interests of the Company’s executive officers with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s long-term incentive program for our NEOs has consisted of restricted stock awards (or “RSAs”), restricted stock units (or “RSUs”) and nonqualified stock options. Each such type of award, and the reasons it is used, is described below. At the 2017 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as the successor to our 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan and 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, and long-term incentive awards granted after the 2017 Annual Meeting have been made under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.

Restricted Stock Awards.RSAs represent the transfer of ownership of a certain number of shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to restrictions on transfer and a substantial risk of forfeiture based on the recipient’s continued employment by the Company during the applicable vesting period set out in the award agreement. RSAs are designed primarily to encourage retention of executive officers and key employees.
Restricted Stock Units.RSUs represent a right to receive a specific number of units at the end of the specified period. Each recipient of RSUs has no rights as a stockholder through such RSUs during the restriction period of his RSUs. Settlement of an RSU award is made in cash, shares of stock or some combination thereof, as specified in the applicable award agreement. RSUs are designed to provide retention incentives to our executive officers and key employees.
Nonqualified Stock Options.Nonqualified stock options represent an option to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an option price equal to the closing price on the NYSE American of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The stock options are designed to motivate executives to increase stockholder value as the stock options will only have value if our stockholders also benefit from increasing stock prices.

Mr. Boegner’s 2015 RSU Award

In January 2015, the Compensation Committee granted 20,000 RSUs to Mr. Boegner as a retention incentive. Mr. Boegner’s RSUs generally were scheduled to vest on August 21, 2018 based on Mr. Boegner’s continued employment, but up to 75% of the RSUs could become vested earlier if certain yearly performance hurdles—based on stock performance—were met. Fifty percent of the RSUs had vested prior to 2017 based upon the achievement of the applicable stock performance hurdles, and an additional 25% of the RSUs vested on August 21, 2017 based on the Company’s achievement of a closing stock price on the NYSE American averages of least $4.84 for a 10-day trading period in 2016 and Mr. Boegner’s continued employment until August 21, 2017.

2017 Equity Grants

On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved grants of stock options and restricted stock to our then-current executive officers under the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan based on management’s recommendations and the officers’ performance. The Committee made the following stock option grants to purchase common shares of the Company at the exercise price of $6.50 per share under the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan: (i) Mr. Cerminara, 60,000; (ii) Mr. Burke, 15,000 (which have since been forfeited upon Mr. Burke’s termination of employment); (iii) Mr. Boegner, 40,000; and (iv) Mr. Schilling, 40,000. These options have a ten-year term and become exercisable in one-fifth annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The options are subject to the terms and conditions of their respective Stock Option Agreements.

In recognition of their contributions to the business, Mr. Cerminara also received 60,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, and Messrs. Boegner and Schilling each received 10,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, in each case pursuant to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the terms and conditions of their respective Restricted Stock Agreements. These shares vest in one-third annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

As a signing bonus and pursuant to the terms of his Employment Agreement, on April 7, 2017 the Company granted Mr. Schulz a stock option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $6.30 per share pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The option becomes exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

2018 Equity Grants

On January 26, 2018, the Compensation Committee approved grants of stock options and RSUs to Messrs. Cerminara, Schulz and Boegner. In making these equity awards, the Committee considered Mr. Cerminara’s relatively low base salary and his contributions to the business, Mr. Schulz’s contributions in strengthening the accounting, finance and financial reporting functions of the Company and the financial performance of the Cinema division led by Mr. Boegner. Each of these executives was granted a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $4.70 per share, under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. The stock options have a ten-year term and become exercisable in one-fifth annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment. The RSU awards to Messrs. Cerminara, Schulz and Boegner each covered 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and those RSUs vest in one-third annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

401(k) Retirement Plan

The Company’s executive officers (including the NEOs) are able to participate in the Company’s Retirement and Savings 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which is a combination savings and profit sharing plan designed to qualify under Section 401 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Participation in the 401(k) Plan is generally available to all Ballantyne employees on the same terms. Each participant may defer up to 100% of his or her compensation. The Company may make a discretionary matching contribution equal to a uniform percentage of salary. Each year the Company determines the amount of the discretionary percentage. In 2017, the Company matched 50% of the amount deferred up to 6% of each participating employee’s contribution. Employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan are non-forfeitable. Employer contributions vest annually over three years on the employee’s employment anniversary. Benefits may be distributed to participants or their beneficiaries, as the case may be, in the event of a participant’s death, retirement or other termination of service, or, if the participant so requests, on reaching age 59½. Participants may be eligible to withdraw benefits in case of hardship.

Contributions to the 401(k) Plan made by the Company on behalf of the NEOs are included in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table.

Other Employee Benefits

The Company also provides its executives with certain benefits which are generally available to all employees of the Company, such as excess life and disability insurance. These benefits for the NEOs are included in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table.

Employment Contracts with Current Executive Officers

The Company has written employment agreements with Messrs. Boegner, Schilling and Schulz. The material provisions of these employment agreements are discussed below.

Mr. Boegner’s employment agreement with the Company, which was entered into on February 14, 2012, provides for a base salary, subject to annual review and adjustment, and Mr. Boegner’s eligibility to participate in and/or receive other benefits under compensation plans provided to other executive employees of the Company, including an automobile allowance (which allowance was eliminated effective as of March 1, 2017). He is eligible for performance-based compensation in the form of an annual bonus and is eligible to receive awards, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, under the Company’s long-term incentive plans. Pursuant to his employment agreement, in the event that his employment is terminated by Ballantyne without good cause or by Mr. Boegner for good reason, as these terms are defined in the agreement, then he will receive his base salary for period equal to three (3) weeks for each year that he has been employed by the Company. In addition, Ballantyne will pay for or reimburse Mr. Boegner for the cost of health insurance during this same period. For more information on the terms of Mr. Boegner’s employment agreement, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control— Employment Agreements.”

Mr. Schilling’s employment agreement, which was entered into on November 2, 2015, provides for a base salary, subject to annual review and adjustment, and Mr. Schilling’s eligibility to participate in and/or receive other benefits under compensation plans provided to other executive employees of the Company. Mr. Schilling’s employment agreement provides that he is eligible for an annual bonus opportunity of up to $325,000, payable partly in cash and partly through equity awards as determined by the Compensation Committee, provided that the Company achieves certain universal goals established by the Compensation Committee. He is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), medical, dental and vision plans and certain other benefits available generally to employees of the Company. Mr. Schilling’s agreement contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. Mr. Schilling’s employment agreement does not provide for any specified severance benefits.

Mr. Schulz’s employment agreement with the Company, which was entered into on March 23, 2017, provides for an annual base salary of $250,000 and a target annual bonus opportunity of $150,000. Any annual bonus earned based on the achievement of performance metrics and other criteria established by the Compensation Committee will be payable partly in cash and partly through equity awards, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The employment also provided Mr. Schulz with a signing bonus in the form of a stock option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, as described above. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Schulz is eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), medical, dental and vision plans and certain other benefits available generally to employees of the Company. The employment agreement also contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. Mr. Schulz’s employment agreement does not provide for any specified severance benefits.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Company has evaluated its compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management and risk taking incentives. Based upon this evaluation, we have concluded that the risks arising from the Company’s relatively uncomplicated compensation structure are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the business.

Compensation Consultant

In 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensation Resources as its independent executive compensation consultant; however, the Compensation Committee did not engage Compensation Resources or any other compensation consultant during 2017. Prior to the consultant’s engagement for 2016 and as part of its annual evaluation of its advisors, the Compensation Committee solicited information from Compensation Resources regarding any actual or perceived conflicts of interest and to evaluate the firm’s independence. Based on the information received from the consultant, the Compensation Committee believes that the work Compensation Resources performed in 2016 did not raise a conflict of interest and that they were independent.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers the tax and accounting treatment of our executive compensation arrangements; however, those considerations have never been controlling factors in the design of our executive compensation programs. In this regard, it should be noted that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which disallows a corporate income tax deduction to the extent that compensation paid to a covered executive in a single year exceeds $1 million, was recently amended to, among other things, repeal an exemption for certain “performance-based compensation” (including stock options granted with an exercise price at least equal to fair market value of the date of grant). As a result of the recent changes to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, certain compensation, such as stock options granted in 2018 and future years, will not be exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, so that compensation income from the exercise of such options will count towards the $1 million annual limit on the Company’s U.S. federal income tax deduction for compensation of a covered executive. The Compensation Committee considered this change in the law when approving equity awards (including stock option grants) to our NEOs in January 2018, but it did not have a material effect on the Compensation Committee’s decision, given the compensation levels of our NEOs and the Compensation Committee’s belief that it is important to structure appropriate compensation arrangements for our executives, even if such compensation might not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2017 there were no compensation committee interlocks and no insider participation in compensation decisions that were required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s compensation program on behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Form 10-K/A and based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Form 10-K/A.

Charles T. Lanktree, Chair

Samuel C. Freitag

William J. Gerber

Robert J. Roschman

James C. Shay

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information with respect to our last completed fiscal year. We believe the pay ratio information provided below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with applicable SEC rules.

For 2017, the Company has calculated (i) the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, (ii) the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees other than the Chief Executive Officer, and (iii) the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees, as follows:

The median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, other than the Chief Executive Officer, was $44,555;
The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $750,672; and
The ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 16.8 to 1.

In determining the pay ratio information provided above, we first identified our median employee for 2017 by using the following methodology:

We selected December 31, 2017 as the date upon which we would identify our median employee, and, from our tax and payroll records, we compiled a list of all full-time, part-time and temporary employees who were employed on that date.
We used gross wages for fiscal 2017, plus Company retirement plan contributions, as a consistently applied compensation measure to identify our median employee from the remaining employees on the list. We did not annualize the compensation of any employees.

Once our median employee was identified in the manner described above, we calculated the annual total compensation of the median employee using the same methodology that we used to determine the annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

Executive Compensation Tables

The following table sets forth information regarding all forms of compensation earned by the Company’s Named Executive Officers during the last three fiscal years. Messrs. Cerminara, Boegner and Schilling were employed by the Company during all of fiscal 2017. Mr. Burke served as Chief Financial Officer from September 29, 2016 until March 29, 2017 when Mr. Schulz was appointed to the position.

2017 Summary Compensation Table

Name and  Principal Position Year Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Stock Awards ($)(8)  Option Awards ($)(8)  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)  All Other Compensation ($)(17)  Total ($) 

D. Kyle Cerminara (1)

 2017  210,577      390,000(9)  144,577(12)     5,518   750,672 
Chairman and CEO 2016  150,000               9,428   159,428 
  2015  38,458(5)     289,796(10)  89,607(13)     511   418,372 
                               
Lance V. Schulz(2)
SVP, Treasurer and CFO
 2017  185,577         93,591(14)     5,917   285,085 
                               
Ryan M. Burke(3) 2017  114,423(6)        36,144(12)     39,927   190,494 
Former SVP, Treasurer and CFO 2016  139,230   35,000(7)           8,430   182,660 
                               
Ray F. Boegner 2017  265,385      65,000(9)  96,385(12)     11,282   438,052 
President of Cinema 2016  225,000   130,000(7)        87,305(16)  50,413   492,718 
  2015  221,498   15,000   85,000(11)  59,738(13)     27,572   408,808 
                               
Stephen L. Schilling(4) 2017  275,000      65,000(9)  96,385(12)     9,118   445,503 
President of 2016  275,000   130,000(7)           9,239   414,239 
Digital Media  2015  42,308         179,651(15)     133,485   355,444 

(1)Mr. Cerminara was named to the Board of Directors on February 20, 2015. On September 23, 2015, Mr. Cerminara was appointed as Executive Chairman. Effective November 24, 2015, Mr. Cerminara was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer. He also continues to serve as our Executive Chairman. For 2017, Mr. Cerminara did not receive any additional compensation as a director or as Executive Chairman. All compensation paid to or earned by Mr. Cerminara in 2016 is reported in this 2017 Summary Compensation Table, including both compensation for his service as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The compensation reported as paid to Mr. Cerminara in 2015 includes compensation for his service as an independent director.
(2)Mr. Schulz was appointed as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer effective March 29, 2017 and was not a Named Executive Officer in 2015 or 2016.

(3)Mr. Burke was appointed as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer effective September 29, 2016, in which capacities he served until March 29, 2017. Mr. Burke served as Corporate Controller until August 25, 2017, and his compensation for services as Corporate Controller is also included in the table. Mr. Burke was not a Named Executive Officer in 2015.
(4)Mr. Schilling was hired as President of Digital Media on November 2, 2015. Prior to Mr. Schilling becoming an employee of the Company, S2 Ventures LLC was paid $130,000 in consulting fees in addition to $3,485 in reimbursed expenses. Mr. Schilling served as Managing Partner of S2 Ventures LLC.
(5)This amount includes $24,227 in fees earned or paid in cash for Mr. Cerminara’s service as an independent director (retainer and meeting fees) in 2015.
(6)Represents Mr. Burke’s salary through August 25, 2017, the effective date of his resignation from the Company.
(7)On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee, upon the recommendation of management, approved payment of discretionary cash bonuses of $35,000 to Mr. Burke and $130,000 to each of Messrs. Boegner and Schilling based on their 2016 performance.
(8)The amounts in these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 718. For additional information relating to the assumptions made in valuing and expensing these awards refer to Note 13 in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC.
(9)Consists of the grant date fair value of the February 28, 2017 grant of 60,000, 10,000 and 10,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to Messrs. Cerminara, Boegner and Schilling, respectively, in accordance with the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The shares vest in one-third annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment.
(10)Includes stock awards granted to Mr. Cerminara both for his service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and for his service as an independent director. Stock awards for service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer consist of the fair value for the November 22, 2015 grant of 60,000 shares of restricted stock in accordance with the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. 30,000 of those shares vested immediately, with the remaining shares vesting on the anniversary date of the grant over a two-year period. Stock awards for service as an independent director consists of the fair value ($29,996) of the May 13, 2015 grant of 6,651 shares of restricted stock in accordance with the 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, which vested on the day preceding the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
(11)Consists of the grant date fair value of the January 20, 2015 grant of 20,000 restricted stock units (RSUs) in accordance with the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, which generally vest on August 21, 2018, but with earlier vesting based on achievement of stock performance hurdles. Fifty percent of the RSUs vested prior to 2018 based upon the achievement of the applicable stock performance hurdles, and an additional 25% of the RSUs vested on August 21, 2017 based on the Company’s achievement of a closing stock price on the NYSE American averages of least $4.84 for a 10-day trading period in 2016 and Mr. Boegner’s continued employment until August 21, 2017.
(12)Consists of the grant date fair value of the February 28, 2017 grant of 60,000, 15,000, 40,000 and 40,000 stock options to Messrs. Cerminara, Burke, Boegner and Schilling, respectively, in accordance with the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock options vest in one-fifth annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Burke’s stock options were forfeited upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017.
(13)Consists of the grant date fair value of the November 22, 2015 grant of 60,000 and 40,000 stock options to Messrs. Cerminara and Boegner, respectively, in accordance with the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, which vest on the anniversary date of the grant over a five year period.
(14)Consists of the grant date fair value of the April 7, 2017 grant of 40,000 stock options in accordance with the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The options were granted as a signing bonus pursuant to the terms of Mr. Schulz’s Employment Agreement with the Company.
(15)Consists of the grant date fair value of the November 22, 2015 grant of 130,000 stock options. The inducement grant of 30,000 shares of the total 130,000 shares of non-qualified stock options received by Mr. Schilling was made outside of the Company’s existing stock compensation plans pursuant to applicable regulations allowing for such an arrangement and vested immediately at the grant date. The remaining 100,000 options granted to Mr. Schilling vest in a one-fifth installment on the first anniversary date of the grant and in subsequent installments on the first day of each subsequent quarter for four years following the first anniversary of the grant date.
(16)Consists of a cash payment made to Mr. Boegner for non-equity performance units awarded in 2012 and 2013 under the terms of the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(17)The Company provides its executives with certain employee benefits. These benefits include excess life and disability insurance and contributions made by the Company under the Ballantyne Retirement and Savings Plan. The amounts reported for each Named Executive Officer as All Other Compensation for 2017 are identified and quantified below:

  Mr. Cerminara  Mr. Schulz  Mr. Burke  Mr. Boegner  Mr. Schilling 
Auto Expenses(1) $  $  $  $2,308  $ 
Accrued Vacation Pay-out        9,381       
Severance        26,154       
Employer match on Retirement and Savings Plan  4,500   5,154   3,714   8,031   8,100 
Excess life and disability insurance  1,018   763   678   943   1,018 
Total All Other Compensation $5,518  $5,917  $39,927  $11,282  $9,118 

(1)As part of Mr. Boegner’s salary increase in February 2017, his auto allowance of $1,000 per month was eliminated effective as of March 1, 2017.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2017

  Grant  All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units  All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options  Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards  Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards 
Name Date  (#)  (#)  ($/share)  ($)(4) 
D. Kyle Cerminara 2/28/17(1)  60,000         390,000 
  2/28/17(2)     60,000   6.50   144,577 
Lance V. Schulz 4/7/17(3)     40,000   6.30   93,591 
Ryan M. Burke 2/28/17(2)     15,000   6.50   36,144 
Ray F. Boegner 2/28/17(1)  10,000         65,000 
  2/28/17(2)     40,000   6.50   96,385 
Stephen L.Schilling 2/28/17(1)  10,000         65,000 
  2/28/17(2)     40,000   6.50   96,385 

(1)On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee granted Messrs. Cerminara, Boegner and Schilling restricted shares of common stock pursuant to our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in one-third annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment. The grantee may exercise full voting rights with respect to the restricted shares, whether or not vested. Any dividends paid with respect to the restricted shares will be added to and become part of the restricted stock.
(2)On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee granted Messrs. Cerminara, Burke, Boegner and Schilling stock options to purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock options become exercisable in one-fifth annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Burke’s stock options were forfeited upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017.
(3)On April 7, 2017, Mr. Schulz received a grant of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock options become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The options were granted as a signing bonus pursuant to the terms of Mr. Schulz’s Employment Agreement with the Company.
(4)The amounts in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information relating to the assumptions made in valuing and expensing these awards refer to Note 13 in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC.

The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards for each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as of the end of the last completed fiscal year.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable  Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable  Option Exercise Price ($)  Option Expiration Date  Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)  Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(*) 
D. Kyle Cerminara  24,000   36,000(1)  4.33   11/22/2025       
      60,000(2)  6.50   2/28/2027       
               60,000(6)  279,000 
                         
Lance V. Schulz     40,000(3)  6.30   4/7/2027       
                         
Ryan M. Burke     (1) (2)        (7)   
                         
Ray F. Boegner
  5,000   (4)  4.70   1/11/2022       
   8,000   16,000(1)  4.33   11/22/2025       
      40,000(2)  6.50   2/28/2027       
               5,000(8)  23,250 
               10,000(9)  46,500 
                         
Stephen L. Schilling  70,000   60,000(5)  4.33   11/22/2025       
      40,000(2)  6.50   2/28/2027       
               10,000(9)  46,500 

* Based on the closing stock price of our common stock of $4.65 on December 29, 2017, the last trading day of the 2017 fiscal year.
(1)The 60,000 and 40,000 stock options granted to Messrs. Cerminara and Boegner, respectively, on November 22, 2015 pursuant to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan become exercisable in five equal annual installments beginning on November 22, 2016 and thereafter on November 22, 2017, November 22, 2018, November 22, 2019 and November 22, 2020. On November 23, 2016, Mr. Boegner exercised options from this grant to acquire 8,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.33 per share. Mr. Burke was also granted 10,000 stock options on November 22, 2015. Upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017, Mr. Burke immediately forfeited 8,000 unvested options and, following a period of thirty days from the effective date of his resignation, forfeited the right to exercise 2,000 options.
(2)The 60,000, 40,000 and 40,000 stock options granted to Messrs. Cerminara, Boegner and Schilling, respectively, on February 28, 2017 pursuant to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan become exercisable in five equal annual installments beginning on February 28, 2018 and thereafter on February 28, 2019, February 28, 2020, February 28, 2021 and February 28, 2022. Mr. Burke was also granted 15,000 stock options on February 28, 2017. Upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017, Mr. Burke immediately forfeited all 15,000 unvested options.
(3)The 40,000 stock options granted to Mr. Schulz on April 7, 2017 pursuant to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on April 7, 2018 and thereafter on April 7, 2019, April 7, 2020 and April 7, 2021.
(4)The 30,000 stock options granted to Mr. Boegner on January 11, 2012 pursuant to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan became exercisable in four equal installments beginning on January 11, 2013 and thereafter on January 11, 2014, January 11, 2015 and January 11, 2016. On both August 11, 2016 and August 30, 2016, Mr. Boegner exercised options from this grant to acquire 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On June 8, 2017, Mr. Boegner exercised options from this grant to acquire 7,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On August 14, 2017, Mr. Boegner exercised options from this grant to acquire 8,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(5)Of the total 130,000 stock options granted to Mr. Schilling on November 22, 2015, the inducement grant of 30,000 options vested immediately as of the grant date. Of the remaining 100,000 options, one-fifth vested on November 22, 2016 and the remaining options vest in subsequent installments (1/20) on the first day of each subsequent quarter for four years following the first anniversary of the grant date.
(6)Represents 60,000 shares of restricted stock. The restricted shares vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 27, 2018 and thereafter on February 27, 2019 and February 27, 2020.
(7)Upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017, Mr. Burke forfeited the right to receive 1,875 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs), which were to vest on August 21, 2018.
(8)Represents 5,000 RSUs to be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis as soon as practicable following the applicable vesting date. All 5,000 RSUs vest on August 21, 2018.
(9)Represents 10,000 shares of restricted stock. The shares vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 27, 2018 and thereafter on February 27, 2019 and February 27, 2020.

The following table sets forth information concerning exercised options and vesting of stock awards for each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers during the last completed fiscal year.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

  Option Awards  Stock Awards
Name Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)  Value Realized on Exercise ($)  Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)  Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
D. Kyle Cerminara        15,000(2)   74,250
Lance V. Schulz           
Ryan M. Burke        1,875(3)  11,813
Ray F. Boegner  7,000   15,750(4)      
   8,000   13,200(5)      
         5,000(3)   31,500
Stephen L. Schilling           

(1)The value realized on vesting represents the product of the number of shares vested and the closing price of the common stock on the vesting date.
(2)Represents the remainder of the restricted shares granted to Mr. Cerminara on November 22, 2015, all of which vested in full on November 22, 202017.
(3)Represents restricted shares that vested on August 21, 2017.
(4)Options exercised on June 8, 2017.
(5)Options exercised on August 14, 2017.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

The following table sets forth quantitative information with respect to potential payments to each of the NEOs or their beneficiaries upon termination in various circumstances, assuming that a change in control or termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2017. The values reported for stock options and restricted shares are based on the closing price of Ballantyne common shares on December 29, 2017 of $4.65 (less the applicable exercise price, in the case of stock options).

    Cash  Equity Awards 
  Termination Scenario Severance
and Benefits
($)
  Stock
Options
($)
  Restricted Shares
($)
  Restricted Share Units
($)
 
D. Kyle Cerminara Death            
  Disability            
  Termination for Cause            
  Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason            
  Change in Control     11,520(1)   279,000    
Lance V. Schulz Death            
  Disability            
  Termination for Cause            
  Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason            
  Change in Control     (2)       
Ray F. Boegner Death            
  Disability            
  Termination for Cause            
  Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason  523,879          
  Change in Control     5,120(3)   46,500   23,250 
Stephen L. Schilling Death            
  Disability            
  Termination for Cause            
  Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason            
  Change in Control     19,200(4)   46,500    

(1)Reflects the value of the accelerated vesting of 36,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $4.33 per share. Does not reflect the accelerated vesting of 60,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and are deemed to be underwater based on the December 29, 2017 closing price of the Company’s common stock.
(2)Does not reflect the accelerated vesting of 40,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and are deemed to be underwater based on the December 29, 2017 closing price of the Company’s common stock.
(3)Reflects the accelerated vesting of 16,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $4.33 per share. Does not reflect the accelerated vesting of 40,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and are deemed to be underwater based on the December 29, 2017 closing price of the Company’s common stock.
(4)Reflects the value of the accelerated vesting of 60,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $4.33 per share. Does not reflect the accelerated vesting of 40,000 stock options, which have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and are deemed to be underwater based on the December 29, 2017 closing price of the Company’s common stock.

Mr. Burke is not included in the table above as he resigned from the Company effective August 25, 2017. Upon his resignation, Mr. Burke forfeited 23,000 unvested stock options, 8,000 of which had an exercise price of $4.33 per share, and 15,000 of which had an exercise price of $6.50 per share, and 1,875 restricted stock units, which were to vest on a one-for-one basis into shares of the Company’s common stock on August 21, 2018. In addition, Mr. Burke forfeited the right to exercise 2,000 vested options, which had an exercise price of $4.33 per share, as he did not exercise such options within thirty days after termination of his employment pursuant to the terms of his stock option agreement.

Employment Agreements

Pursuant to Mr. Boegner’s employment agreement with the Company, in the event Mr. Boegner’s employment is terminated by the Company without good cause or by Mr. Boegner for good reason, then he will receive his base salary for a period equal to three (3) weeks for each year that he has been employed by the Company and all existing insurance benefits shall remain in force until the last day of the month in which the severance period expires, subject to Mr. Boegner’s continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants set forth in the employment agreement (including confidentiality and non-solicitation covenants) and his execution of the Company’s standard form of general release. In addition, Mr. Boegner would be entitled to receive any earned and unpaid amounts owed to him under the employment agreement and such other accrued benefits as may be provided for under the agreement. Assuming a termination date of December 31, 2017, as required by the SEC’s rules, the approximate value of the severance benefits would have been $523,879 for Mr. Boegner. For purposes of Mr. Boegner’s employment agreement, “good reason” means a material breach by the Company of its obligations to Mr. Boegner under the agreement. In addition, for purposes of the agreement, “cause” exists if Mr. Boegner (i) acted dishonestly or incompetently or engaged in willful misconduct in performance of his executive duties, (ii) breached fiduciary duties owed to the Company, (iii) intentionally failed to perform reasonably assigned duties, (iv) willfully violated any law, rule or regulation, or court order (other than minor traffic violations or similar offenses), or otherwise committed any act which would have a material adverse impact on the business of the Company, and/or (v) is in breach of his obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the breach from the Company.

We are also obligated under Mr. Boegner’s employment agreement to provide certain payments to Mr. Boegner in the event of his death or termination by reason of his incapacity. In the event of Mr. Boegner’s death, we are obligated to pay his estate all accrued sums due and owing to Mr. Boegner with respect to his salary and such other benefits as may be provided under his agreement. In addition, in the event we terminate Mr. Boegner’s employment by reason of his incapacity, Mr. Boegner is entitled to any accrued amounts due and owing to him with respect to his salary and such other benefits as may be provided under his agreement.

The respective employment agreements for Messrs. Schulz and Schilling do not provide for any specified severance benefits. However, Messrs. Schulz and Schilling, along with Mr. Cerminara, would have been entitled during the 2017 fiscal year to severance and other benefits, such as accrued vacation, pursuant to the Company’s then-existing severance policy available to all salaried employees.

2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan – Change in Control Provisions

Our 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which was approved by our stockholders on June 15, 2017, generally provides for “double-trigger” vesting of equity awards in connection with a change in control of the Company, as described below.

To the extent that outstanding awards granted under the 2017 Plan are assumed in connection with a change in control, except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement or in another written agreement with the participant, all outstanding awards will continue to vest and become exercisable (as applicable) based on continued service during the remaining vesting period, with performance-based awards being converted to service-based awards at the “target” level. Vesting and exercisability (as applicable) of awards that are assumed in connection with a change in control generally would be accelerated in full on a “double-trigger” basis, if, within two years after the change in control, the participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause, or by the participant for “good reason.” Any stock options or stock appreciation rights (SARs) that become vested on a “double-trigger” basis generally would remain exercisable for the full duration of the term of the applicable award.

To the extent outstanding awards granted under the 2017 Plan are not assumed in connection with a change in control, then such awards generally would become vested in full on a “single-trigger” basis, effective immediately prior to the change in control, with performance-based awards becoming vested at the “target” level. Any stock options or SARs that become vested on a “single-trigger” basis generally would remain exercisable for the full duration of the term of the applicable award.

The Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine whether or not any outstanding awards granted under the 2017 Plan will be assumed by the resulting entity in connection with a change in control, and the Compensation Committee has the authority to make appropriate adjustments in connection with the assumption of any awards. The Compensation Committee also has the right to cancel any outstanding awards in connection with a change in control, in exchange for a payment in cash or other property (including shares of the resulting entity) in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares subject to the award over any exercise price related to the award, including the right to cancel any “underwater” stock options and SARs without payment therefor.

For purposes of the 2017 Plan, subject to the exceptions set forth in the 2017 Plan, a “change in control” generally includes (a) the acquisition of more than 50% of the voting power or value of the Company’s stock; (b) the incumbent board of directors ceasing to constitute a majority of the board of directors during a twelve-month period; and (c) the acquisition of 50% or more of the gross fair market value of the Company’s assets over a twelve-month period. The full definition of “change in control” is set out in the 2017 Plan.

For purposes of the 2017 Plan, unless otherwise defined in a written agreement with the participant or an applicable severance plan, “cause”, as a reason for the Company’s termination of a participant’s employment, generally means that the participant (a) acted dishonestly or incompetently or engaged in willful misconduct in performance of his or her duties; (b) breached fiduciary duties owed to the Company; (c) intentionally failed to perform reasonably assigned duties, which the participant did not satisfactorily correct within 30 calendar days following written notification; (d) was convicted or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere of any felony crime involving dishonesty; or (e) otherwise committed any act which could have a material adverse impact on the business of the Company.

For purposes of the 2017 Plan, unless otherwise defined in a written agreement with the participant or an applicable severance plan, “good reason”, as a reason for a participant’s termination of his or her employment, generally means the occurrence of any of the following without the participant’s consent (and unless timely cured by the Company following notice from the participant): (a) any material diminution in the participant’s compensation or benefits, unless generally applicable to all similarly situated employees of the Company; (b) the assignment to the participant of any duties inconsistent with, or substantially adverse to his or her status and duties, or a reduction in title; (c) a material breach by the Company or a subsidiary of its obligations under the participant’s employment agreement, if any; or (d) the relocation of the participant’s primary work location to a location more than fifty miles away from the current location, in each case if not cured by the Company within the time limits set forth in the 2017 Plan.

Except as described above with respect to a change in control, unexercisable stock options, unvested restricted shares and unvested RSUs generally become forfeited upon termination of employment. The stock options that are exercisable at the time of termination of employment expire within the earlier of thirty days after such termination or the expiration date of the options. Upon termination for “cause,” all options, whether or not exercisable, are generally automatically forfeited.

Awards granted under the 2017 Plan may be subject to forfeiture or recoupment as determined by the Compensation Committee in the event of certain detrimental activity, such as a participant’s breach of applicable restrictive covenants. Awards granted under the 2017 Plan also may be subject to forfeiture or recoupment as provided pursuant to any compensation recovery (or “clawback”) policy that the Company may adopt or maintain from time to time.

2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan – Change in Control Provisions

Our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) provides that no acceleration of an award shall occur upon or after a “change in control” unless such acceleration is provided for in the applicable award agreement and determined by the Compensation Committee on a grant-by-grant basis or as may be provided in an after written agreement between the Company and the grantee. The award agreements for the stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units granted to Messrs. Cerminara, Schulz, Burke, Boegner and Schilling under our 2010 Plan provide for accelerated vesting of all unvested options, restricted shares and restricted share units upon the occurrence of a “change in control” while the grantee is employed by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company as of the date of the change in control.

For purposes of the 2010 Plan, subject to the exceptions set forth in the 2010 Plan, a “change in control” generally includes (i) the acquisition of more than 50% of the company’s common stock; (ii) over a twelve-month period, the acquisition of more than 50% of the company’s common stock or the replacement of a majority of the board of directors by directors not endorsed by the persons who were members of the board before the new directors’ appointment; and (iii) the acquisition of more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all the assets of the Company over a twelve-month period.

Assuming that a change-in-control occurred at December 31, 2017, as required by the SEC’s rules, the approximate value of the vesting of equity awards (excluding any “underwater” stock options) would have been $290,520 for Mr. Cerminara, $0 for Mr. Schulz, $74,870 for Mr. Boegner and $65,700 for Mr. Schilling.

Upon his resignation from the Company effective August 25, 2017, Mr. Burke immediately forfeited all of his unvested stock options and restricted stock units and therefore did not recognize any value upon his resignation.

24

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to the Company’s directors in fiscal 2017, except for Mr. Cerminara who does not receive any separate compensation for his service as a director.

  Fees Earned Or Paid in Cash ($)(1)  Stock Awards ($)(3)  Option Awards ($)  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)  Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation ($)
  Total ($) 
Samuel C. Freitag(2)  32,750   30,000               62,750 
William J. Gerber(2)  28,917   30,000               58,917 
Lewis M. Johnson  26,500   30,000               56,500 
Charles T. Lanktree(2)  32,250   30,000               62,250 
Robert J. Roschman  28,500   30,000               58,500 
James C. Shay(2)  32,583   30,000               62,583 
Ndamukong Suh  25,750   30,000               55,750 

(1)Represents the annual retainer fee paid to each director and cash payments for attendance at Board meetings and Board committee meetings both in person and via teleconference. Although not included in the above table, the directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses of attending Board meetings.
(2)Messrs. Shay and Gerber each earned a pro rata portion of $10,000 for acting as Chairman of the Audit Committee (Mr. Shay served as Chairman until immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting on June 15, 2017, at which time Mr. Gerber was appointed as Chairman), Mr. Lanktree earned $5,000 for acting as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Mr. Freitag earned $5,000 for acting as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(3)

On June 15, 2017, Messrs. Freitag, Gerber, Johnson, Lanktree, Roschman, Shay and Suh were each granted 4,405 restricted stock units under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. The restricted stock units vest on June 15, 2018, subject to the recipient’s continued service as a director of the Company through such date. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of common stock of the Company. The amounts shown in this column include the fair value of the annual restricted stock award on the date of grant, which was $6.81 per share. For additional information relating to the assumptions made in valuing and expensing these awards for 2017, refer to Note 13 in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC.

The aggregate number of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2017 for each of Messrs. Freitag, Gerber, Johnson, Lanktree, Roschman, Shay and Suh was 4,405.

Effective June 15, 2017, our non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $25,000, paid in quarterly installments, and the following cash payments for attending Board meetings and Board committee meetings: (i) $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person; (ii) $500 for each Board meeting attended via teleconference; (iii) $500 for each Board committee meeting attended in person; and (iv) $250 for each Board committee meeting attended via teleconference. Each non-employee director also receives an annual grant of restricted stock units with a value of $30,000. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of common stock of the Company and vests on the one year anniversary of the grant date. In addition, the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Audit Committee each receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000, paid in quarterly installments, and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an annual cash retainer of $5,000, paid in quarterly installments. The non-employee directors also receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for attending Board meetings.

Our 2017 Plan includes a limit on the amount of compensation payable to our non-employee directors. Specifically, the 2017 Plan provides that the aggregate grant date fair value of all awards granted to any single non-employee director during any single calendar year (determined as of the applicable grant date(s) under applicable financial accounting rules), when taken together with any cash fees paid to the non-employee director during the same calendar year, may not exceed $200,000.

25

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Largest Owners of Ballantyne Shares

The following table shows each person or entity that Ballantyne knows to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of April 16, 2018.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)  Percent of Class(2) 
Fundamental Global Investors, LLC
4201 Congress Street, Suite 140
Charlotte, NC 28209
  3,507,664(3)  24.3%
Ariel Investments, LLC
200 E. Randolph Street, Suite 2900
Chicago, IL 60601
  2,888,434(4)  20.0%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One
Austin, TX 78746
  1,058,562(5)  7.3%
Howard A. Steinberg
16441 NE 31 Avenue
North Miami Beach, FL 33160
  1,001,006(6)  6.9%

(1)This information is based on Schedules 13G and 13D, as amended, and a Form 4 filed with the SEC. Fundamental Global Investors, LLC filed an amended Schedule 13D on August 23, 2017 and a Form 4 on January 3, 2018; Ariel Investments, LLC (“Ariel”) filed an amended Schedule 13G on February 13, 2018; Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”) filed an amended Schedule 13G on February 9, 2018; and Howard A. Steinberg filed an amended Schedule 13D on June 6, 2017.
(2)Based upon 14,422,090 shares outstanding on April 16, 2018.
(3)Fundamental Global Investors, LLC has shared dispositive power over 3,507,664 shares, representing approximately 24.3% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, and shared voting power over 2,470,714 shares. The number reported in the table includes the 1,036,950 shares held by CWA Asset Management Group, LLC, a wealth advisor and multi-family office of which Fundamental Global Investors, LLC owns 50%, for the accounts of individual investors. Additional affiliates of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, including Messrs. Cerminara and Johnson, hold 559,195 shares (including 36,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Cerminara exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018 and 4,405 shares issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units held by Mr. Johnson within 60 days of April 16, 2018), thus increasing the total number of shares beneficially owned by Fundamental Global Investors, LLC to 4,066,859 shares, or 28.2% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock.
(4)Ariel reported that it has sole voting power over 2,415,248 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,888,434 shares. Ariel reported that its adviser clients have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, all securities reported as beneficially owned by Ariel.
(5)Dimensional reported that it has sole voting power over 1,029,829 shares and sole dispositive power over 1,058,562 shares. Dimensional reported that the funds, group trusts and separate accounts it provides investment management or adviser services to have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, the securities held in their respective accounts which are reported as beneficially owned by Dimensional.
(6)

Howard A. Steinberg reported that he has sole voting and dispositive power over 20,000 shares held by him through an IRA, shared voting power over 976,006 shares and shared dispositive power over 981,006 shares. Mr. Steinberg reported that he has shared voting and dispositive power over 625,000 shares held by private family investment funds as the President of the general partner of each investment fund, which includes call options with respect to 10,000 shares, 119,000 shares held by him and his wife as tenants in the entirety and through his wife’s IRA, over which Mr. Steinberg has voting and dispositive authority, 95,606 shares held by his son Brandon Steinberg directly and through an IRA, over which Mr. Steinberg has voting and dispositive authority, and 11,400 shares held by his other son, over which Mr. Steinberg has voting and dispositive authority. The remainder of the shares over which Mr. Steinberg holds shared voting and dispositive power are held by trusts for the benefit of family members. In addition, Brandon Steinberg holds sole voting and dispositive power over 1,035 shares held in his 401(k) account. Brandon Steinberg serves as a Financial Analyst of the Company.

26

Share Ownership of Directors and Officers

The following chart sets forth, as of the close of business on April 16, 2018, certain information concerning beneficial ownership of common stock by each director of the Company, each of the named executive officers (as defined below), and all current directors and executive officers as a group. The address for each director and executive officer listed is: c/o Ballantyne Strong, Inc., 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68154.

Name 

Number of Shares Beneficially

Owned(1)

  Percent of Common Stock(2) 
D. Kyle Cerminara, Chairman and CEO  3,757,923(3)  26.1%
Lance V. Schulz, Senior Vice President, CFO and Treasurer  10,000(4)  * 
Ray F. Boegner, President of Cinema  144,019(5)  1.0%
Stephen L. Schilling, President of Digital Media  117,492(6)  * 
Samuel C. Freitag, Director  278,070(7)  1.9%
William J. Gerber, Director  17,241(8)  * 
Lewis M. Johnson, Director  3,526,754(9)  24.5%
Charles T. Lanktree, Director  24,741(10)  * 
Robert J. Roschman, Director  31,629(11)  * 
James C. Shay, Director  46,151(12)  * 
Ndamukong Suh, Director  18,215(13)  * 
Ryan M. Burke, Former Senior Vice President, CFO and Treasurer  5,625(14)  * 
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(11 persons)
  4,464,571(15)  31.0%

*Less than 1% of common stock outstanding.
(1)Each director and named executive officer listed above owns all outstanding shares directly and has sole voting and investment power over such shares unless otherwise specified below.
(2)

Based upon 14,422,090 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 16, 2018. Each named person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of April 16, 2018, upon the exercise of stock options. In addition, Messrs. Freitag, Gerber, Johnson, Lanktree, Roschman, Shay and Suh each hold 4,405 restricted stock units vesting within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Accordingly, the number of shares and percentage set forth next to the name of such person, and all current directors and executive officers as a group, includes shares of directly owned common stock (including shares of restricted common stock), shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018 and shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018. However, the shares of common stock so issuable upon the exercise of stock options and/or vesting of restricted stock units held by any such person are not included in calculating the percentage of common stock beneficially owned by any other stockholder.

(3)Includes 191,279 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Cerminara (including 40,000 restricted shares granted on February 28, 2017), 7,540 shares held in Mr. Cerminara’s 401(k) plan, 15,440 shares held by Mr. Cerminara’s wife and children and 36,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Also includes 3,507,664 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, the largest stockholder of the Company, and its affiliates (collectively, “Fundamental Global”). Mr. Cerminara, as Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, is deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Fundamental Global. Mr. Cerminara disclaims beneficial ownership of the Fundamental Global shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Does not include 40,000 shares potentially issuable to Mr. Cerminara pursuant to restricted stock units granted on January 26, 2018. Does not include 36,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on November 22, 2015, 48,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on February 28, 2017 and 50,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on January 26, 2018.
(4)

Includes 10,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Does not include 40,000 shares potentially issuable to Mr. Schulz pursuant to restricted stock units granted on January 26, 2018. Does not include 30,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on April 7, 2017 and 50,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on January 26, 2018.

(5)Includes 123,019 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Boegner (including 6,667 restricted shares granted on February 28, 2017) and 21,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Does not include 5,000 shares potentially issuable pursuant to restricted stock units granted on January 20, 2015 and 40,000 shares potentially issuable pursuant to restricted stock units granted on January 26, 2018. Does not include 24,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on November 22, 2015, 32,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on February 28, 2017 and 50,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on January 26, 2018.
(6)Includes 29,292 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Schilling (including 6,667 restricted shares granted on February 28, 2017) and 200 shares of common stock held by Mr. Schilling’s child. Also includes 88,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Does not include 50,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on November 22, 2015 and 32,000 shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted on February 28, 2017.
(7)Includes 175,665 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Freitag, 98,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Freitag’s wife and children and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.
(8)Includes 12,836 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Gerber and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.
(9)Includes 14,685 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Johnson and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018. Also includes 3,507,664 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Fundamental Global, the largest stockholder of the Company. Mr. Johnson, as President, Co-Founder and Partner of Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, is deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Fundamental Global.

(10)

Includes 12,836 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Lanktree, 7,500 shares directly owned by the Donna B. Lanktree Family Trust, the trustee of which is Donna B. Lanktree, the spouse of Mr. Lanktree, and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.

(11)Includes 27,224 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Roschman and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.
(12)Includes 41,746 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Shay and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.
(13)Includes 13,810 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Suh and 4,405 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018.

(14)Mr. Burke, a named executive officer, served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company from September 29, 2016 until March 29, 2017 and was the Company’s Corporate Controller until August 25, 2017. Based on Mr. Burke’s Form 3 filed on October 3, 2016 and Form 4 filed on March 2, 2017 and the Company’s internal records, consists of 5,625 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Burke.
(15)

Includes 642,392 shares owned directly by all current directors and executive officers as a group (including 53,334 restricted common shares), 7,540 shares held in Mr. Cerminara’s 401(k) plan, 15,440 shares held by Mr. Cerminara’s wife and children, 200 shares held by Mr. Schilling’s child, 98,000 shares held by Mr. Freitag’s wife and children, 7,500 shares held by the Donna B. Lanktree Family Trust, 155,000 shares purchasable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 16, 2018, 30,835 shares issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 16, 2018 and 3,507,664 shares held by Fundamental Global.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.2018.

 

      Number of securities 
      remaining available 
 Number of securities     for future issuance 
 to be issued upon Weighted average under equity 
 exercise of exercise price of compensation plans 
 outstanding options, outstanding options, excluding securities 
Plan Category warrants and rights  warrants and rights  reflected in column (a)  Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
 
  (a)   (b)   (c)  (a) (b) (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  966,135(1)  $5.63   1,253,354(2)   1,144,498(1) $5.06   1,049,156(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders           -   -   - 
Total  966,135  $5.63   1,253,354   1,144,498  $5.06   1,049,156 

 

(1)Includes 820,300427,000 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options under our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and 440,000 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and 5,000 securities to be issued upon vesting of restricted stock units under our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and 110,000 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and 30,835277,498 securities to be issued upon vesting of restricted stock units under our 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
(2)All shares available for future issuance are under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.

 

The information regarding our largest holders and ownership of our securities by our management and directors will be contained in the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” section of the definitive proxy statement, to be filed in connection with the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by this item will be contained in the “Related Person Transaction Procedures” and “Corporate Governance – Board Independence” sections of the definitive proxy statement, to be filed in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION PROCEDURES

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The Company’s Audit Committee Charter requiresinformation required by this item will be contained in the Audit Committee to review policies and procedures regarding transactions between the Company and officers and directors that are not a normal part“Proposal Three – Ratification of Appointment of the Company’s business. There are no formal written policies or procedures usedIndependent Auditors” and “Board Committees – Audit Committee” sections of the definitive proxy statement, to be filed in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by Board or the Audit Committee to review, approve or ratify related party transactions. Rather, the Board or the Audit Committee reviews all related party transactions on a case by case basis for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis and uses its discretion in approving all such transactions. The Board or the Audit Committee will apply the standards of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K when evaluating certain relationships and related transactions.reference.

 

61

On an annual basis, the Company determines whether there are any related party transactions that need to be evaluated

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and approved by the Board or the Audit Committee based on the responses received from each director and executive officer based on his questionnaire completed in conjunction with the Form 10-K/A. While there are no formal written policies or procedures used, the Board or the Audit Committee may consider the following factors in evaluating related party transactions:Financial Statement Schedules

a.The following documents are filed as part of this report on Form 10-K:

 

 1.the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;Consolidated Financial Statements:
   
 An Index to the presenceConsolidated Financial Statements is filed as a part of standard prices, rates, charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties;Item 8.
   
 2.the materiality of the transaction to each party;
the reasons for the Company entering into the transaction with the related person;
the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and
any other factors the Board or the Audit Committee may deem relevant.Exhibit list.

 

All of the arrangements discussed below have been approved by the Audit Committee and/or the independent members of our Board of Directors.

StrongVest Global Advisors, LLC

StrongVest Global Advisors, LLC (“StrongVest”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the investment advisor to CWA Income ETF (the “Fund”), an exchange-traded fund and series of StrongVest ETF Trust (the “Trust”). CWA Asset Management Group, LLC (doing business as “Capital Wealth Advisors”) (“CWA”), which is 50% owned by Fundamental Global Investors, LLC (“FGI”), the largest stockholder of the Company, is the sub-advisor to the Fund. Mr. Cerminara, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, is Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Partner of FGI and Co-Chief Investment Officer of CWA, and Mr. Johnson, a director of the Company, is President, Co-Founder and Partner of FGI and Co-Chief Investment Officer of CWA. Messrs. Cerminara and Johnson are managing members of FGI, and each owns a 33.3% ownership interest in FGI.

The executive officers, employees and directors of the Company hold various positions with StrongVest and the Trust. Mr. Cerminara, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, serves as President, Principal Executive Officer and Trustee of the Trust and Chief Executive Officer of StrongVest. Ryan R.K. Turner, an employee of the Company, serves as President of StrongVest. Mr. Schulz, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, serves as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Trust and as Treasurer and Secretary of StrongVest (which positions were previously held by Mr. Burke, former Chief Financial Officer of the Company), and Mr. Jeffrey L. Sutton, an employee of the Company, also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of StrongVest and as Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of the Trust.

Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between the Fund and StrongVest (the “Advisory Agreement”), the Fund pays StrongVest a unitary fee for the services it provides payable on a monthly basis at the annual rate of 0.75% of the Fund’s average daily net assets, which fee was $38,638 in fiscal 2017. Out of the unitary management fee, StrongVest is obligated to pay or arrange for the payment of substantially all expenses of the Fund, including the cost of transfer agency, custody, fund administration, legal, audit and other services and the fees and expenses of independent trustees (“Fund Expenses”), except for interest expenses, distribution fees or expenses, brokerage expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses such as litigation and other expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business. StrongVest’s unitary management fee is designed to cause substantially all of the Fund’s expenses to be paid and to compensate StrongVest for providing services for the Fund. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement between StrongVest and CWA (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”), StrongVest pays CWA a fee for the services it provides payable on a monthly basis equal to 50% of the advisory fee that the Fund pays StrongVest (net of the Fund Expenses paid by StrongVest). Pursuant to this arrangement, StrongVest paid CWA $19,319 in fiscal 2017.

Blueharbor Bank

On April 27, 2017, we entered into a debt agreement with blueharbor bank consisting of (1) a $2.0 million five-year term loan secured by a first lien deed of trust on our Alpharetta, GA facility, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.5% and payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest calculated based on a 20-year amortization schedule with a final balloon payment of approximately $1.7 million due on May 10, 2022, and (2) a line of credit of up to $1.0 million secured by a second lien deed of trust on our Alpharetta, GA facility, bearing interest at the Prime Rate published in the Wall Street Journal plus 0.25% (4.75% at December 31, 2017) and with a term ending May 10, 2018. Under the debt agreement, we must maintain a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth not in excess of 3 to 1 and maintain minimum liquidity of $2.0 million. At December 31, 2017, the balance of the term loan including current maturities was $2.0 million. We also had outstanding borrowings on our line of credit of $0.5 million and had the ability to borrow up to an additional $0.5 million. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with our debt covenants.During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid approximately $32,000 of principal on the term loan and paid an aggregate of $66,000 of interest under the debt agreement.

Mr. Cerminara, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is a member of the board of directors of blueharbor bank. In addition, the funds managed by Fundamental Global Investors, LLC, of which Mr. Cerminara is the Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Partner, and Mr. Johnson, a member of our Board of Directors, is the President, Co-Founder and Partner, and its affiliates together beneficially own less than five percent of the stock of blueharbor bank. The independent members of our Board of Directors approved our debt agreement with blueharbor bank.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board of Directors is composed of a majority of independent directors as defined by the listing requirements of the NYSE American. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Freitag, Gerber, Johnson, Lanktree, Roschman, Shay and Suh are independent directors of the Company under the listing standards adopted by the NYSE American. In making these independence determinations, the Board considered all of the factors that automatically compromise director independence as specified in the NYSE American’s listing standards and determined that none of those conditions existed. In addition, the Board considered whether any direct or indirect material relationship, beyond those factors that automatically compromise director independence, existed between those directors, their immediate family members, or their affiliated entities, on the one hand, and us and our subsidiaries, on the other hand. The Board determined, for those directors identified as independent above, that any relationship that existed was not material and did not compromise that director’s independence. Our independent directors meet in an executive session at least once per year. All committee members are independent for the purpose of the committees on which they serve.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2016. The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional service rendered by BDO for each of the last two fiscal years:

  2017  2016 
Audit Fees(1) $482,800  $513,900 
Audit-Related Fees(2)  15,344    
Tax Fees      
All Other Fees      
Total $498,144  $513,900 

(1)Includes fees for professional services rendered during the fiscal year for the audit of our annual financial statements and for reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In addition, includes fees for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP related to state regulatory filing requirements in 2017 and 2016 and fees for the review of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 and the issuance of the related consent in 2017.
(2)Includes fees for professional services rendered for the review of standalone financial statements for one of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The Audit Committee has implemented pre-approval procedures consistent with the rules adopted by the SEC. All audit and permitted non-audit services are pre-approved by the Committee. The Committee has delegated the responsibility of approving proposed non-audit services that arise between Committee meetings to the Chairman, provided that the decision to approve the services is presented for ratification at the next scheduled Committee meeting.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

    Incorporated by Reference  

Exhibit

Number

 Document Description Form Exhibit 

Filing

Date

 

Filed

Herewith

           
2.1+ Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2016, by and between Strong Westrex, Inc. and GABO Filter, Inc. 8-K 2.1 November 7, 2016  
           

3.1

 Certificate of Incorporation of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.1 December 7, 2006  
           
3.1.1 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.1.1 December 7, 2006  
           
3.1.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.1.2 December 7, 2006  
           
3.1.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.1.3 December 7, 2006  
           
3.1.4 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation 10-Q 3.1.4 August 7, 2009  
           
3.2 Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. Bylaws S-8 3.2 December 7, 2006  
           
3.2.1 First Amendment to Bylaws of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.2.1 December 7, 2006  
           
3.2.2 Second Amendment to Bylaws of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.2.2 December 7, 2006  
           
3.2.3 Third Amendment to Bylaws of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. S-8 3.2.3 December 7, 2006  
           
3.2.4 Fourth Amendment to Bylaws of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. 8-K 99.1 May 1, 2007  
           
3.2.5 Fifth Amendment to Bylaws of Ballantyne Strong, Inc. S-8 4.11 May 16, 2014  

    Incorporated by Reference  

Exhibit

Number

 Document Description Form Exhibit 

Filing

Date

 

Filed

Herewith

10.1 Authorized Reseller Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc. 10-K 10.10 March 23, 2010  
           
10.2* Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan S-8 4.12 June 15, 2017  
           
10.3* Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan S-8 4.13 June 15, 2017  
           
10.4* Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan S-8 4.14 June 15, 2017  
           
10.5* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement under the Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan S-8 4.15 June 15, 2017  
           
10.6* Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated) 8-K 10.1 May 20, 2014  
           
10.7* Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan 8-K 10.1 November 27, 2015  
           
10.8* Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan 8-K 10.2 November 27, 2015  
           
10.9* Executive Employment Agreement, dated February 14, 2012, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Ray F. Boegner 10-Q 10.27 May 4, 2012  
           
10.10* Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2015, between Convergent Media Systems Corporation and Stephen L. Schilling 8-K 10.1 November 4, 2015  
           
10.11* Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2015, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Stephen L. Schilling 8-K 10.3 November 27, 2015  
           
10.12* Stock Option Agreement under Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated as of November 22, 2015, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Stephen L. Schilling 8-K 10.4 November 27, 2015  
           
10.13* Executive Employment Agreement, dated March 29, 2017, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Lance V. Schulz 8-K 10.1 March 29, 2017  

    Incorporated by Reference  

Exhibit

Number

 Document Description Form Exhibit 

Filing

Date

 

Filed

Herewith

10.14* Consulting Agreement, dated November 16, 2018, by and between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Lance V. Schulz 8-K 10.1 November 20, 2018  
           
10.15* Executive Employment Agreement, dated November 7, 2018, between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Mark D. Roberson 8-K 10.1 November 7, 2018  
           
10.16 Term Loan Business Loan Agreement, dated April 27, 2017, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and blueharbor bank, as Lender 8-K 10.1 May 3, 2017  
           
10.17 Term Loan Promissory Note, dated April 27, 2017, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and blueharbor bank, as Lender 8-K 10.2 May 3, 2017  
           
10.18 Line of Credit Business Loan Agreement, dated April 27, 2017, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and blueharbor bank, as Lender 8-K 10.3 May 3, 2017  
           
10.19 Credit Agreement, dated April 27, 2017, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and blueharbor bank, as Lender 8-K 10.4 May 3, 2017  
           
10.20 Note Modification Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2018, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and blueharbor bank, as Lender 8-K 10.1 April 24, 2018  
           
10.21 Master Equipment Lease Agreement between Huntington Technology Finance, Inc. and Convergent Media Systems Corporation 8-K 10.1 June 27, 2017  
           
10.22 Progress Payment Note and Reimbursement Agreement between Convergent Media Systems Corporation and Huntington Technology Finance, Inc., effective as of June 22, 2017 8-K 10.2 June 27, 2017  
           
10.23 Credit Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2018, between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Strong/MDI Screen Systems, Inc. 10-Q 10.6 August 8, 2018  
           
10.24 Contract of Sale, dated April 27, 2018, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Seller, and Metrolina Alpharetta, LLC, as Buyer 8-K 10.1 May 1, 2018  

    Incorporated by Reference  

Exhibit

Number

 Document Description Form Exhibit 

Filing

Date

 

Filed

Herewith

10.25 Lease Agreement, between Metrolina Alpharetta, LLC, as Landlord, and Ballantyne Strong, Inc., as Tenant 10-Q 10.3 August 8, 2018  
           
10.26 Form of Warrant, to be issued by Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 8-K 10.3 May 1, 2018  
           
10.27 Master Installment Payment Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2018, by and between Convergent Media Systems Corporation, as Borrower, and NEC Financial Services, LLC, as Lender 8-K 10.1 May 29, 2018  
           
10.28 Letter Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2018, by and between Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Fundamental Global Investors, LLC 8-K 10.1 September 12, 2018  
           
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant are as follows:        

Exhibit

Number

 Document DescriptionNameFiled HerewithJurisdiction of
Incorporation
a.Strong Westrex, Inc.Nebraska
b.Strong Technical Services, Inc.Nebraska
c.Strong/MDI Screen Systems, Inc.Canada
d.Convergent CorporationGeorgia
e.Convergent Media Systems CorporationGeorgia
f.StrongVest Global Advisors, LLCDelaware
g.Strong Digital Media, LLCDelaware

23Consent of BDO USA, LLPX
24The Power of Attorney authorizing D. Kyle Cerminara and Mark D. Roberson to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, for fiscal 2018 on behalf of non-management directorsX
    
31.1 Principal Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
    
31.2 Principal Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
101The following materials from Ballantyne Strong, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsX

*Management contract or compensatory plan.
**Furnished herewith.
+The exhibits and schedules to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish copies of such exhibits and schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

65

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. 
   
By:/s/LANCE V. SCHULZD. Kyle Cerminara By:/s/Mark D. Roberson
 Lance V. Schulz, Senior

D. Kyle Cerminara, Chairman of the Board of

Directors and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Mark D. Roberson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:March 12, 2019Date:March 12, 2019

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:/s/D. Kyle Cerminara

D. Kyle Cerminara, Chairman of the Board

of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:March 12, 2019 
   
By:/s/William J. Gerber (1)
William J. Gerber, Director
Date:April 26, 2018March 12, 2019
By:/s/Jack H. Jacobs (1)
Jack H. Jacobs, Director
Date:March 12, 2019
By:/s/Lewis M. Johnson (1)
Lewis M. Johnson, Director
Date:March 12, 2019
By:/s/Charles T. Lanktree (1)
Charles T. Lanktree, Director
Date:March 12, 2019
By:/s/Robert J. Roschman (1)
Robert J. Roschman, Director
Date:March 12, 2019
By:/s/Ndamukong Suh (1)
Ndamukong Suh, Director
Date:March 12, 2019 

 

(1)

Signed by the undersigned as

attorney-in-fact and agent for the

Directors indicated

By:/s/Mark D. Roberson
Mark D. Roberson,Attorney-In-Fact
Date:March 12, 2019