UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K/A10-K

(Amendment No. 1)

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20222023

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

 

Commission File No. 001-38392

 

BLINK CHARGING CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada 03-0608147

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

   
605 Lincoln Road5081 Howerton Way, 5th FloorSuite A  
Miami BeachBowie, FloridaMaryland 3313920715
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (305) 521-0200

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock BLNK The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
  Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by the check mark whether the registrantregistration has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

 

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b)§240.10D-1(b). ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No No

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates (42,228,389(59,580,526 shares) computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold ($16.53)5.99) as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2022)2023): $714,565,270356,887,351.

 

As of April 28, 2023,March 15, 2024, there were 61,170,166100,993,579 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference:Reference None.

 

Audit Firm ID

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

Auditor NameAuditor Location
688Marcum LLPNew York, NY

 

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

Blink Charging Co. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to amend the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (Commission File No. 001-38392) (the “2022 Annual Report”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 14, 2023 (the “Original 10-K”). This Amendment is being filed for the sole purpose of including the stock performance graph in Part II and the information required by Part III of Form 10-K. The information required by Part III was previously omitted from the Original 10-K in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, which permits the information in Part III to be incorporated in the Form 10-K by reference from our definitive proxy statement if such statement is filed no later than 120 days after our fiscal year end. We are filing this Amendment to include Part III information in our Form 10-K because we will not file a definitive proxy statement containing this information within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by the Original 10-K. This Amendment amends and restates in their entirety Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III and Item 15 of Part IV of the Original 10-K. This Amendment also amends Item 5 of Part II to include the stock performance graph.BLINK CHARGING CO.

Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), this Amendment contains certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which are attached hereto.

This Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original 10-K (i.e., those events occurring after March 14, 2023) or modify or update those disclosures that may be affected by subsequent events. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the 2022 Annual Report and our other filings with the SEC.

2

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 PART IPage
 
ITEM 1.PART IIBUSINESS.4
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS.14
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.25
ITEM 1C.CYBERSECURITY.25
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES.26
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.26
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.27
 
 PART II
 
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESSECURITIES.428
ITEM 6.[RESERVED]28
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.28
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.40
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.40
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.40
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.40
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.42
ITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.42
  
 PART III 
   
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEGOVERNANCE.453
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION.1543
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSMATTERS.2943
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCEINDEPENDENCE.3143
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICESSERVICES.3243
   
 PART IV 
   
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSCHEDULES.3344
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY45
SIGNATURES3546

2

FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements present our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements because they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and include statements regarding, among other things, our projected revenue growth and profitability, our growth strategies and potential acquisitions, anticipated trends in our market, and our anticipated needs for working capital. They are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “management believes,” “we believe,” “we intend” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the following statements:

According to The International Energy Agency, global EV sales are projected to grow from 3 million vehicles in 2020 to about 25 million vehicles in 2030, a 25% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over this period;
the EV charger industry as a whole is undercapitalized to deliver the full potential of the expected EV market growth in the near future;
we expect to retain our leadership position with new capital;
we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock;
we anticipate continuing to expand our revenues by selling our next generation of EV charging equipment, expanding Blink owned and operated charging equipment, expanding our sales channels, and implementing EV charging station occupancy fees (fees for remaining connected to the charging station beyond an allotted grace period after charging is completed), implementing subscription plans for our Blink-owned public charging locations, and advertising fees;
we are unique in our ability to offer various business models to Property Partners (as defined herein) and leverage our technology to meet the needs of both Property Partners and EV drivers; and
we announced a strategic plan to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA by December 2024.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results and events anticipated or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

changes in the market acceptance of our products and services;
increased levels of competition;
changes in political, economic, or regulatory conditions generally and in the markets in which we operate;
geopolitical crises, outbreak of hostilities, and acts of war such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Israeli-Hamas war, and Houthi rebel ship attacks in the Red Sea, the actions that have been and could be taken by other countries, including new and stricter sanctions and actions taken in response to such sanctions;
our relationships with key customers;
adverse conditions in the industries in which our customers operate;
our ability to retain and attract senior management and other key employees;
our ability to respond to new technological developments quickly and effectively;
our ability to protect our trade secrets or other proprietary rights, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, and prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights; and
other risks, including those described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.

We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. We cannot predict all of those risks, nor can we assess the impact of all of those risks on our business or the extent to which any factor may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are based on assumptions management believes are reasonable. However, due to the uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.

Certain market data and other statistical information in this Annual Report are based on information from independent industry organizations and other third-party sources, including industry publications, surveys, and forecasts. Some market data and statistical information contained in this Annual Report are also based on management’s estimates and calculations derived from our review and interpretation of the independent sources listed above, our internal research, and our knowledge of the EV industry. While we believe such information is reliable, we have not independently verified any third-party information, and our internal data has not been verified by any independent source.

From time to time, forward-looking statements are also included in our other periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, in our press releases, in our presentations, on our website, and in other materials released to the public. Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report any other reports or public statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and may turn out to be inaccurate. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions, and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Considering these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Annual Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Annual Report.

Except to the extent required by U.S. federal securities law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

For a discussion of factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results, see “Item 1A – Risk Factors” below.

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “Blink,” “Blink Charging,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Blink Charging Co., a Nevada corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The mark “Blink” is our registered trademark in the United States and, in the name of Ecotality, Inc. (whose assets we acquired in October 2013), in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, South Africa, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, and is a trademark registered in the European Union under the Madrid Protocol. We have registered other trademarks and use certain trademarks, trade names, and logos that have not been registered. We claim common law rights to these unregistered trademarks, trade names, and logos.

 

3

 

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS.

Overview

Blink Charging Co., through its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading manufacturer, owner, operator, and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services in the rapidly growing U.S. and international markets for EVs. Blink offers residential and commercial EV charging equipment and services, enabling EV drivers to recharge at various locations. Blink’s principal line of products and services is its Blink EV charging networks (the “Blink Networks”) and Blink EV charging equipment, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (“EVSE”), and other EV-related services. The Blink Networks are a proprietary, cloud-based system that operates, maintains, and manages Blink charging stations and handles the associated charging data, back-end operations, and payment processing. The Blink Networks provide fleets, property owners, managers, parking companies, and state and municipal entities (“Property Partners”), among other types of commercial customers, with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations. The Blink Networks also provide EV drivers with vital station information, including station location, availability, and fees (as applicable).

To capture more revenues derived from providing EV charging equipment to commercial customers and to help differentiate Blink in the EV infrastructure market, Blink offers Property Partners a comprehensive range of solutions for EV charging equipment and services that generally fall into one of the business models below, differentiated by who owns the equipment and who bears the costs of installation, equipment, maintenance, and the percentage of revenue shared.

In our Blink-owned turnkey business model, we incur the charging equipment and installation costs. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Networks. In this model, which favors recurring revenues, we incur most costs associated with the EV charging stations; thus, we retain substantially all EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees. Our agreement with the Property Partner typically lasts nine years, with extensions that can bring it to 27 years.

In our Blink-owned hybrid business model, we incur the charging equipment costs while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity to the Blink Networks. In this model, since the Property Partner incurs the installation costs; we share a more generous portion of the EV charging revenues with the Property Partner after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees. Our agreement with the Property Partner typically lasts seven years, with extensions that can bring it to 21 years.

In our host-owned business model, the Property Partner purchases, owns, and operates the Blink EV charging station and incurs the installation costs. We work with the Property Partner by providing site recommendations, connectivity to the Blink Networks, payment processing, and optional maintenance services. In this model, the Property Partner retains and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees.

In our Blink-as-a-Service model, we own and operate the EV charging station, while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. The Property Partner pays us a fixed monthly fee for the service and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees. Our agreement with the Property owner typically lasts five years.

We also own and operate EV car-sharing and ride-sharing programs through our wholly owned subsidiary, Blink Mobility. These programs allow customers to share electric vehicles through subscription services and charge those cars through our charging stations.

In pursuit of our commitment to fostering the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) through the establishment and management of EV charging infrastructure on a global scale, we remain steadfast in our dedication to mitigating climate change. This dedication is evidenced by our efforts to diminish greenhouse gas emissions stemming from gasoline-powered vehicles. With the goal of being a leader in the build-out of EV charging infrastructure and maximizing our share of the EV charging market, we have established strategic commercial, municipal, and retail partnerships across industry verticals and encompassing numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal sites, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations.

In 2023, we entered into agreements with significant new customers, including the United States Postal Service (USPS), Mack Trucks, McArthurGlen, BluePoint, Mike Albert Fleet Solutions, Royal Farms, John Henry General Store, Moberly Motor Company, Arcos Dorados (McDonald’s Puerto Rico), AAA, Allegiant Stadium (Las Vegas), Village of Tuckahoe (NY), Miami Beach (FL), Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, and Salt Lake City International Airport, that expand our potential for unit sales and deployments. Similarly, in 2022, we entered into agreements with significant new customers, including Mitsubishi, Cushman & Wakefield, Triple J, Q-Park, Best Buy, UBS, Bosch Mexico, Porsche Puerto Rico and Guatemala, Veris Residential, Greystar, Cambium, and the cities of Atlanta (GA), Rockford (IL), Newton (IA), Winslow (N.J), and Leeds (UK). Along with these new business relationships, we forged critical strategic relationships with organizations that directly or indirectly influence EV charging stations purchase decisions. Examples include the Florida Sheriff’s Association Cooperative, the State of Utah, Illinois Region 1 Planning Council, AES El Salvador, and Vizient – the largest member-driven healthcare performance improvement company in the United States representing more than $130 billion in annual purchasing volume.

4

In 2022, we expanded our presence through the acquisitions of SemaConnect and Electric Blue, establishing new offices in Bowie, Maryland, and St. Albans, United Kingdom. Additionally, we opened manufacturing facilities in Bowie, Maryland, and Bangalore, India. These additions enhance our capacity in the U.S. and internationally, enabling us to develop and manufacture hardware and innovate new software capabilities to address the evolving EV charging landscape. They also serve as crucial hubs for operations in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. This expansion aligns with our strategic goal of growing our global engineering teams and establishing operational hubs to support our international expansion into new regions.

As of December 31, 2023, we sold or deployed 89,825 chargers, of which 72,418 were in the Blink Networks (244 Level 1 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 44,673 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 5,569 Level 2 private commercial chargers, 667 DC Fast Charging EV publicly accessible chargers, 36 DC Fast Charging EV private chargers, and 525 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, inclusive of 20,704 chargers pending to be commissioned). Included in the Blink Networks are 5,150 chargers owned by us. The remaining 17,407 were non-networked, on other networks or international sales or deployments (761 Level 2 commercial chargers, 16 DC Fast Charging chargers, 12,224   residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, 2,938 sold to other U.S. networks and 1,468 sold internationally).  The charger units noted above are net of swap-out or replacement units.

As an EV charging station leader, we understand our corporate social responsibility and remain steadfast in our commitment to fostering a cleaner, improved global environment. By prioritizing our environmental, social, and governance initiatives, we consistently enhance our standing within the EV industry as a responsible and value-enhancing service provider within the ecosystem. Upholding sustainable procurement, we intend to persist in aligning with partners who share our vision for societal advancement and uphold ethical business standards. As our technology advances, we are devoted to implementing recycling programs aimed at repurposing older products.

Industry Overview

The plug-in electric vehicle market experienced significant growth in recent years with EV adoption hitting an all-time high of 7.8% in 2023 in the U.S., as reported by BNEF. Anticipating sustained momentum, we foresee continued growth throughout 2024, propelled by the introduction of new EV models into the market as automotive manufacturers continue to scale production of EVs. Sales projections indicate a trajectory of ongoing increase, buoyed by technological advancements, heightened competition, and a trend of declining prices.

In addition, we believe the advancements made in battery technologies will allow EVs to achieve approximate cost parity with internal combustion engine vehicles and will extend driving range and consumer confidence moving the market away from range anxiety toward range confidence, creating further consumer demand.

Moreover, the U.S. Administration and private companies’ increasing focus on climate related initiatives and their large-scale commitment and investment in developing and expanding the EV charging infrastructure are making it easier for drivers to own and use EVs.

The demand for electric vehicles has been further propelled by government incentives and regulations at federal, state, and local levels. It is anticipated that government agencies worldwide will persist in offering incentives to promote EV purchases, while continuing to roll out regulations aimed at reducing emissions and incentivizing the adoption of clean energy vehicles. At the U.S. federal level, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides $7.5 billion for EV charging network development across the United States for both DCFC and Level 2 chargers. At the state level, California, Oregon, New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts among other states, have created mandates for EVs to achieve more than 6.8 million EVs on the road by 2030 and many states provide additional EV incentives to consumers. Further, a shift towards EV car-sharing has boosted the transition to EV fleets, leading to increased EV charging station demand.

2024 is expected to be a year of increasing numbers of EV models available and improved infrastructure to support them. In 2023, many auto traditional and new manufacturers such as Mercedes, Ford, General Motors, BMW, Fisker, BYD, Lucid, and Rivian brought new electric vehicle models and ramped up production of existing models.

As pioneers in the EV charging industry, we continue to lead as market demands for a robust charging infrastructure increase. We are the only EV charging company based in the United States to offer complete vertical integration from research and development and manufacturing to EV charger ownership, operations and services. This vertical integration creates significant opportunities to control our supply chain and accelerate our go-to-market speed while reducing operating costs. We believe this opportunistically positions us to meet this demand both domestically and globally.

5

Industry Overview

The plug-in electric vehicle market experienced significant growth in recent years with EV adoption hitting an all-time high of 7.8% in 2023 in the U.S., as reported by BNEF. Anticipating sustained momentum, we foresee continued growth throughout 2024, propelled by the introduction of new EV models into the market as automotive manufacturers continue to scale production of EVs. Sales projections indicate a trajectory of ongoing increase, buoyed by technological advancements, heightened competition, and a trend of declining prices.

In addition, we believe the advancements made in battery technologies will allow EVs to achieve approximate cost parity with internal combustion engine vehicles and will extend driving range and consumer confidence moving the market away from range anxiety toward range confidence, creating further consumer demand.

Moreover, the U.S. Administration and private companies’ increasing focus on climate related initiatives and their large-scale commitment and investment in developing and expanding the EV charging infrastructure are making it easier for drivers to own and use EVs.

The demand for electric vehicles has been further propelled by government incentives and regulations at federal, state, and local levels. It is anticipated that government agencies worldwide will persist in offering incentives to promote EV purchases, while continuing to roll out regulations aimed at reducing emissions and incentivizing the adoption of clean energy vehicles. At the U.S. federal level, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides $7.5 billion for EV charging network development across the United States for both DCFC and Level 2 chargers. At the state level, California, Oregon, New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts among other states, have created mandates for EVs to achieve more than 6.8 million EVs on the road by 2030 and many states provide additional EV incentives to consumers. Further, a shift towards EV car-sharing has boosted the transition to EV fleets, leading to increased EV charging station demand.

2024 is expected to be a year of increasing numbers of EV models available and improved infrastructure to support them. In 2023, many auto traditional and new manufacturers such as Mercedes, Ford, General Motors, BMW, Fisker, BYD, Lucid, and Rivian brought new electric vehicle models and ramped up production of existing models.

As pioneers in the EV charging industry, we continue to lead as market demands for a robust charging infrastructure increase. We are the only EV charging company based in the United States to offer complete vertical integration from research and development and manufacturing to EV charger ownership, operations and services. This vertical integration creates significant opportunities to control our supply chain and accelerate our go-to-market speed while reducing operating costs. We believe this opportunistically positions us to meet this demand both domestically and globally.

Our EV Charging Solutions

We offer a variety of EV charging products and services to Property Partners and EV drivers.

EV Charging Solutions

Level 2. We offer a wide range of Level 2 (AC) EV charging equipment, ideal for commercial and residential use, with the North American standard J1772 connector, the North American Charging Standard (NACS) connector, and the Type 2 connector compatible with electric vehicles in Europe and across Latin America.

Our commercial Level 2 chargers consist of the EQ, HQ, MQ, and IQ 200 families and the Series 4, 6, 7, and 8 families, which are available in pedestal, wall mount, and pole mount configurations. The MQ and IQ 200, along with the Series 6, 7, and 8 chargers offer an optional cable management system. Additionally, we offer three residential Level 2 chargers for the Americas: the wall-mounted HQ 200, Series 4, and a smart charging cable, the PQ 150, designed for European markets. Our commercial and residential chargers (except the non-networked HQ 150) can connect to the Blink Networks or a local network. Level 2 charging stations typically provide a full charge in two to eight hours. Level 2 chargers are ideally suited for low-cost installations and frequently used parking locations, such as workplaces, multifamily residential, retail, hospitality, and mixed-use, parking garages, municipalities, colleges/schools, hospitals and airports.

International Products. We offer Level 2 AC and DC products for the rapidly expanding international markets targeted at the residential, workplace, retail, parking garages, leasing companies, hospitality, and other locations. These products are available with the Type 2, GBT, and CCS 2 connectors and include the PQ 150, Series 3 (an ideal product for the 2/3-wheeled vehicles), and the EQ 200.

Mobile Charger. We offer the HQ 200-M Level 2 charger for the mobile/emergency charging market which requires a portable charger to be used for roadside or other use cases where a connection to the electricity grid is not available.

6

DCFC. We offer a complete line of DC Fast Charging equipment (“DCFC”) that ranges from 30kW to 360kW, supports the ‘CHAdeMo’, CCS1, and NACS connectors, and typically provide an 80% charge in less than 30 minutes. Installation of DCFC stations and grid requirements are typically greater than Level 2 charging stations and are ideally suited for transportation hubs and locations between travel destinations. These include the Series 9 30kW DC Fast Charger that works ideally for the fleet and auto dealership segments and is available in wall and pedestal mount configurations, the Blink 30kW DC Fast Charger that boasts a small footprint providing up to 100 amps of output, and the Blink 60kW – 360kW DC Fast Charger that provides from 140 to 500 amps of power.

Blink Network. The Blink Network is a cloud-based platform that manages our network of EV chargers around the world for remote monitoring, management, payment processing, customer support, and other features required for operating the Blink Networks of EV charging locations.

Blink Charging Mobile App. We offer Blink Charging Mobile Apps (iOS and Android) that provide EV drivers control by giving them improved search capabilities which allows them to search for nearby amenities, as well as chargers by zip-codes, city, business, category, or address, and expanded keyword search. The app also includes payment functionality, eliminating the need for a credit card.

Fleet Management. We offer Fleet Management applications, targeted at commercial, municipal, and federal fleets for planning, managing, and optimizing their departure schedules and energy costs. Our Fleet Management applications can be used as standalone tools or integrated into existing fleet management solutions, which allows Blink to be a flexible and value-added solution within existing software stacks.

Competitive Advantages/Operational Strengths

Long-Term Contracts with Property Owners. We have strategic and often long-term agreements that include location exclusivity with Property Partners across numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, car dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal locations, multifamily residential and condo, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations. Property Partners include well-recognized companies, large municipalities and local businesses. Representative examples include the City of Miami Beach, City of Chula Vista, City of Phoenix, City of Portland, City of Knoxville, City of San Antonio, City of Leeds (UK), University of San Diego, Ohlone College, ACE Parking, Q-Park, Icon Parking, SP+ Parking, iPark, LAZ Parking, Reef Parking, Federal Realty, Equity Residential, Related Group, Johnson & Johnson, Kaiser Permanente, Blessing Healthcare, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Starbucks, JBG Associates, Kroger Company, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Fry’s Food & Drug, Inc., Raising Cane’s, McDonald’s, Carl’s Jr., Burger King, Walgreens and Ralphs Grocery Company. We continue to generate new contracts with Property Partners that previously secured our services independently or had contracts with the EV service providers that we acquired in the past.

Vertically Integrated Supply Chain, Engineering and Manufacturing. With the acquisition of SemaConnect, we have become a fully vertically integrated charging equipment and software provider, among the few in the world. We believe this strategy provides multiple benefits among which are the bottom-up approach to design and engineering, compliance with “Buy American” hardware requirements, controlling the supply chain timing and costs, ensuring adequate levels of inventory in constrained markets, and ability to capture the manufacturing margin in a high-demand environment.

Differentiated but Flexible Business Models. We own, operate and supply proprietary electric vehicle charging equipment and networked EV charging services. We believe that our ability to provide various business models, including a comprehensive turnkey solution, to Property Partners and leverage our technology to meet both Property Partners’ and EV drivers’ needs provides us a competitive advantage in addition to more compelling long-term growth opportunities than possible through equipment sales only.

Ownership and Control of EV Charging Stations and Services. We own a considerable percentage of our charging stations, which is a significant differentiation between us and some of our primary competitors. This ownership model allows us to control the settings and pricing for our EV charging services, service the equipment as necessary, and have more effective brand management and price uniformity. As for those stations that we do not own, we are using our best efforts to encourage their owners to keep the stations operating in good order and, in some cases, to replace faulty stations with our new charging station equipment.

Our Growth Strategy

Our objective is to continue becoming a vertically integrated and leading provider of EV charging solutions by deploying mass-scale EV charging infrastructure. By doing so, we aim to enable the accelerated growth of EV adoption and the EV industry. Key elements of our growth strategy include:

Relentless Focus on Customer Satisfaction. Our objective is to increase overall customer satisfaction among new and existing Property Partners and EV drivers. This entails prioritizing charger uptime and availability while expanding and enhancing the EV charging infrastructure within densely populated regions of high demand. Furthermore, we are committed to optimizing the productivity and utilization of existing EV charging stations, as well as enhancing the key features of our EV charging station hardware and Blink Networks.

7

We are equally focused on analyzing our network uptime and reliability and dedicating resources to improve these areas. We believe that improvement on these metrics is critical for the EV charging industry and its continuous growth as EV owners and considerers need to have confidence in the infrastructure for charging.

Pursue Strategic Opportunities to Expand Blink-Owned Turnkey and Hybrid Models. We have structured our business to identify and pursue opportunities to develop Blink’s owner and operator business model with locations that have potential of high utilization, where grant or rebate funds are available, and where we can realize long-term benefit for the EV charging location to establish long-term recurring revenue.

Continue to Invest in Technology Innovations. We will continue to enhance the product offerings available in our EV charging hardware, cloud-based software, and networking capability. In October 2022, we unveiled our all-new Blink Networks and Blink Charging Mobile Apps (Android and iOS), redesigned from the ground-up, with industry-leading architecture, improving reliability, user experience and flexibility capable of iterating as the industry matures. The new Network can serve a wide variety of EV equipment, languages, currencies, and applications, allowing Blink to stay competitive in the fast-moving EV charging landscape. Concurrently, the new mobile app creates a seamless driver charging experience across the globe. Our software implementation allows us to remain technology agnostic to enable the onboarding of OCPP compliant equipment from other manufacturers onto our newly designed network.

Strengthen and Support our Human Capital. Our experienced employees and management team are our most valuable resources. Attracting, training, and retaining key personnel has been and will remain critical to our success. To achieve our human capital goals, we intend to stay focused on providing our personnel with entrepreneurial opportunities to expand our business within their areas of expertise. We will also continue to provide our personnel with personal and professional growth opportunities, including additional training, performance-based incentives such as opportunities for stock ownership, and other competitive benefits.

Expand Sales and Marketing Resources. We intend to invest in sales and marketing infrastructure to capitalize on market growth and expand our go-to-market strategy while maintaining a disciplined approach to expenses. Today, we use a direct sales force, as well as resellers and distributors, and will continue expanding through the use of independent sales agents, utilities, contractors, automotive manufacturers, and dealers.

Seek Strategic Acquisition Opportunities. We seek domestic and international acquisition opportunities which are accretive towards our profitability targets, while allowing us to expeditiously expand our footprint of EV charging station locations, product offerings and enhance our Blink Network.

Leverage Our Early Mover Advantage. We continue to leverage our extensive and defendable first-mover advantage and the digital customer experience we have created for both EV drivers and Property Partners. We believe that hundreds of thousands of Blink driver registrants appreciate the value of transacting charging sessions on established robust networks. Blink chargers are primarily deployed throughout the United States, Europe, Mexico, and Central America. Users commonly exhibit a preference for remaining with a single, cohesive network.
Appropriately Capitalize Our Business. We continue to pursue new potential capital sources to deliver critical operational objectives and the necessary resources to execute our overall strategy. The EV charging industry, as a whole, is undercapitalized to deliver the full potential of the expected EV market growth in the near future. We expect to retain our leadership position with new growth capital as required.

Integration of Four Recent Acquisitions.

On April 18, 2023, we completed the acquisition of Envoy Technologies, Inc. Envoy is a car sharing platform with an iOS/Android app that provides on-demand electric vehicles as an amenity to apartments, office buildings and hotels. The company equips real estate owners and operators with a new and innovative way to enhance the lifestyle of their tenants, members and guests by providing “Mobility as an Amenity™ service,” a platform that offers a technology to reserve and access vehicles, driver insurance, maintenance, electric vehicle chargers, electric fleet, fleet maintenance, full-service mobile app, customer support and robust analytics. Envoy provides the technology, operations and vehicles to implement private and dedicated auto-sharing as an amenity for any community.

On June 15, 2022, we completed the acquisition of SemaConnect, Inc., a leading provider of EV charging infrastructure solutions in North America with manufacturing facilities in both the United States and India. Upon the closing of the acquisition, SemaConnect became a wholly owned subsidiary of our company, allowing Blink to comply with “Buy America” mandates and adding nearly 13,000 active chargers and over 150,000 registered users to the Blink Networks.


On April 22, 2022, pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 22, 2022, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings B.V., all the outstanding capital stock of Electric Blue Limited, a private company limited by shares and registered in England and Wales (“EB”), from its shareholders. Headquartered in St. Albans, United Kingdom, EB is a leading provider of electric vehicle charging and sustainable energy solutions and technologies.

On May 10, 2021, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V., closed on the acquisition of the outstanding capital stock of a Belgian company, Blue Corner NV (“Blue Corner”), from its shareholders. Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe. The acquisition of Blue Corner was made to enter the European market and provide an opportunity to expand our footprint in this region.

8

Sales

Our sales organization builds and maintains long-term business relationships with our customers by utilizing our four core business models. These business models provide a high degree of flexibility to match host location goals and objectives for EV charging with our industry-leading equipment and software solutions. Our team identifies locations that have the potential to create long-term, recurring value for the Property Partner and Blink. Sales personnel are able to pivot to traditional equipment sales or charging-as-a-service models when, and if, a location is not identified as a promising generator of future recurring revenues. The team strives to maintain a balance between equipment sales that grow revenue today, and site locations that have potential to generate strong revenues in the future under our owner-operator business models.

We also engage with strategic distributor and reseller partners across a range of vertical markets both within the U.S. and globally. These organizations typically have unique relationships or capabilities within their respective markets and provide Blink with additional sales opportunities. These partnerships amplify Blink’s sales reach and are authorized to sell our EV charging hardware, software services (connectivity to the Blink Networks), and extended warranty service plans.

We are making further inroads into the residential charging station market where we sell Level 2 chargers through various internet channels, such as Amazon, Walmart.com, BestBuy and other online retailers, to reach the single-family residential charging market in the United States.

In 2023, we entered into agreements with new major customers, including the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), Mack Trucks, McArthurGlen, BluePoint, Mike Albert Fleet Solutions, Royal Farms, John Henry General Store, Moberly Motor Company, Arcos Dorados (McDonald’s Puerto Rico), AAA, Allegiant Stadium (Las Vegas), Village of Tuckahoe (NY), Miami Beach (FL), Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, Salt Lake City International Airport, and others that expand our potential for unit sales and deployments. Similarly, in 2022, we entered into agreement with new major customers including Mitsubishi, Cushman & Wakefield, Triple J, Q-Park, Best Buy, UBS, Bosch Mexico, Porsche Puerto Rico and Guatemala, Veris Residential, Greystar, Cambium, and cities of Atlanta (GA), Rockford (IL), Newton (IA), Winslow (NJ), Leeds (U.K.) and others. Along with these new business relationships, we forged critical strategic relationships with organizations that directly or indirectly influence EV charging station purchase decisions. Examples include Sustainable Westchester in New York and Clean Cities Organizations in Virginia, Vermont, and Ohio, Florida Sheriff’s Association Cooperative, Utah State, Illinois Region 1 Planning Council, AES El Salvador and Vizient.

In addition to adding sales personnel within key markets, we solidified our organizational structure through hiring talented business development professionals and establishing a new account management team to onboard customers and maintain long-term relationships.

Our in-house staff performs a variety of marketing activities. Our marketing team works to promote and sell our services to a variety of vertical markets, and directly to EV drivers. We also utilize marketing and communication channels, including press releases, email marketing, website (www.blinkcharging.com), pay-per-click advertising, social media marketing, webinars, sponsorships and partnerships, advertising and conferences. Our websites’ information is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this Annual Report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC.

We continue to invest in improving our company-owned stations’ service and maintenance and those stations with service and maintenance plans and expanding our cloud-based network capabilities. We anticipate continuing to grow our revenues by (i) selling our next generation of EV charging equipment to current as well as to new Property Partners, which includes airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal locations, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations, (ii) expanding our sales channels to wholesale distributors, utilities, auto original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), solar integrators, and dealers, which will include implementing EV charging station occupancy fees (after charging is completed, fees for remaining connected to the charging station beyond an allotted grace period) and subscription plans for EV drivers on our company-owned public charging locations, (iii) adding additional charging stations in locations with increasing utilization metrics, (iv) offering Blink Care (silver / gold), and (v) offering warranty for our chargers and services.

Our Customers and Partners

We have strategic partnerships across numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed use and municipal locations, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations. We have hundreds of Property Partners that include well recognized companies, large municipalities, and local businesses. We strive to engage all Blink-owned turnkey and hybrid property partners with exclusive EV charging contracts. This strategy further supports our owner-operator model to generate recurring revenue for both the Property Partner and Blink. Representative examples are McDonald’s, Sony Pictures, Caltrans, Audi of America, Porsche Design Tower, City of Azusa, City of Chula Vista, City of Springfield, City of Tucson, City of Fayetteville, BJ’s Inc., Federal Realty, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Fry’s Food & Drug, Inc., Kana Hotel Group, Kroger Company, and Ralphs Grocery Company. We continue to establish new contracts with Property Partners that previously secured our services independently or had contracts with the EV services providers that we acquired.

9

Our revenues are primarily derived from fees charged to EV drivers for EV charging in public locations, EV charging hardware sales, government grants and sales of equipment warranties. EV charging fees to drivers are based on an hourly rate, by energy dispensed per kilowatt-hour (“kWh”), or by session. Such fees are calculated based on various factors, including associated station costs and local electricity tariffs. EV charging hardware is sold to our Property Partners such as InterEnergy, Green Commuter, Nashville Music Center, Wendy’s and other Property Partners engaged with our host-owned business model. Other income sources from EV charging services are network fees, extended warranty fees, membership fees, and payment processing fees paid by our Property Partners. Blink generates revenues from its EV car-sharing program through Envoy and BlueLA, which allow customers the ability to retain electric vehicles through a subscription service.

We teamed up with Google Maps to make locating EV charging stations straightforward and accessible. Our charging stations are displayed in Google Maps.

We are focused on profitable international expansion and have made significant progress at expanding our business across the globe, focusing primarily on Europe, United Kingdom, and Latin America.

On June 15, 2022, we completed the acquisition of SemaConnect, Inc., a leading provider of EV charging infrastructure solutions in North America with manufacturing facilities in both the United States and India. Upon the closing of the acquisition, SemaConnect became a wholly owned subsidiary of our company, allowing us to comply with “Buy America” mandates and adding nearly 13,000 active chargers and over 150,000 registered users to the Blink Networks.

On April 22, 2022, pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 22, 2022, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings B.V., all the outstanding capital stock of Electric Blue Limited, a private company limited by shares and registered in England and Wales (“EB”), from its shareholders. Headquartered in St. Albans, United Kingdom, EB is a leading provider of electric vehicle charging and sustainable energy solutions and technologies.

On May 10, 2021, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V., closed on the acquisition of the outstanding capital stock of a Belgian company, Blue Corner NV (“Blue Corner”), from its shareholders. Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe. The acquisition of Blue Corner was made to enter the European market and provide an opportunity to expand our footprint in this region. Additionally, we operate through Blink Charging Ltd. for our expansion in Israel and Blink Hellas SA for our expansion in Greece. We are in the process of establishing numerous subsidiaries in Latin America as we further concentrate our international efforts. Finally, we established a new software development team in India, managed by our Indian subsidiary, Blink Charging Software Solutions Ltd.

Our Competition

The EV charging equipment and service market is highly competitive, and we expect the market to become increasingly competitive as new entrants enter this growing market. Our products and services compete on product performance and features, the total cost of ownership, sales capabilities, financial stability, brand recognition, product reliability, and the installed base’s size. Our existing competition in the U.S. currently includes ChargePoint, which manufactures EV charging equipment and operates the ChargePoint Network, and EVgo, which offers home and public charging with pay-as-you-go and subscription models. Other entrants into the connected EV charging station equipment market include Flo, Volta, Clipper Creek, StarCharge, Wallbox, Freewire, Autel, and EV Connect. We believe these additional competitors struggle with gaining the necessary network traction but could gain momentum in the future. While Tesla does offer EV charging services, the connector type currently restricts the chargers to Tesla vehicles only in North America, which we believe will change as a number of OEMs have announced transitioning to the North American Charging Standard (NACS) used by Tesla. Many other EV charging companies offer non-networked or “basic” chargers with limited customer leverage but could provide a low-cost solution for basic charger needs in commercial and home locations.

Our competitive advantage in this market includes vertical integration and our exclusive, long-term contracts with our Property Partners and flexible business models. We offer our EV charging station equipment and provide access to a robust EV charging network.

Government Grants

We have a full-time dedicated team to identify and process federal and state funding opportunities for EV charging infrastructure development. We are committed to pursuing EV charging development grant opportunities in all 50 states. Funding sources in the U.S. include the Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Department of Agriculture, the VW mitigation settlement trust fund, funding initiatives from utility service providers and various state and local jurisdictions. In Europe, we have a significant presence both in the European Union and the United Kingdom through our acquisitions of Blue Corner and Electric Blue. Our staff in Europe has significant experience in applying and taking advantage of various European jurisdictions incentives and rebate programs.

10

Disclosure Related to Climate Change

On March 21, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed rules mandating climate-related disclosures in companies’ annual reports and registration statements. The proposed rules contemplate phase-in periods based on SEC filer status, with extended phase-in periods for Scope 3 disclosures and third-party attestation requirements. Under the direction and supervision of senior management and with board oversight, our Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) Committee has initiated a process to implement and maintain compliance with the SEC’s climate disclosure requirements as they are enacted.

Privacy and Data Security Laws

We are currently subject, and/or may in the future be subject, to numerous privacy and data security laws. For example, some U.S. states, members of the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, and many other jurisdictions in which we operate have adopted some form of privacy and data security laws and regulations which impose significant compliance obligations.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which is wide-ranging in scope, imposes several requirements relating to a variety of matters, including the control over personal data by individuals to whom the personal data relates, the information provided to the individuals, the documentation we must maintain, the security and confidentiality of the personal data, data breach notification, and the use of third-party processors in connection with the processing of personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data outside of the European Union (“EU”), provides an enforcement authority, and authorizes the imposition of large penalties for noncompliance, including the potential for significant fines. The GDPR requirements apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between Blink Charging and its subsidiaries, including employee information. The GDPR has increased our responsibility and potential liability in relation to all types of personal data that we process and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, which could divert management’s attention and increase its cost of doing business, and despite our ongoing efforts to bring its practices into compliance with the GDPR, it may not be successful.

Additionally, we are governed by a California state privacy law called the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), which contains requirements similar to GDPR for the handling of personal information of California residents. The CCPA establishes a privacy framework for covered businesses, including an expansive definition of personal information and data privacy rights for California residents. The CCPA includes a framework with potentially severe statutory damages and private rights of action. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers (as that word is broadly defined in the CCPA), and new ways for such consumers to opt out of certain sales of personal information, and to allow for a new cause of action for data breaches. Further, California voters approved a new privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) in November 2020. Effective starting on January 1, 2023, the CPRA will significantly modify the CCPA, including by expanding the consumers’ rights with respect to certain sensitive personal information. The CPRA also creates a new state agency that will be vested with authority to implement and enforce the CCPA and the CPRA. New legislation proposed or enacted in various other states will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. For example, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act became effective on January 1, 2023, the Colorado Privacy Act becomes effective on July 1, 2023, the Connecticut Act Concerning Personal Data Privacy and Online Monitoring becomes effective on July 1, 2023, and the Utah Privacy Act becomes effective on December 1, 2023.

The GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, CPA, and CDPA exemplify the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data. Our compliance costs and potential liability may increase as a result of additional national and international regulatory requirements related to data privacy and data security. We are currently subject, and/or may in the future be subject, to numerous privacy and data security laws. For example, some U.S. states, members of the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, and many other jurisdictions in which we operate have adopted some form of privacy and data security laws and regulations which impose significant compliance obligations.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

We are committed to sourcing only responsibly produced materials. We have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to child or forced labor and human trafficking by our suppliers. We believe that sound corporate governance is critical to helping us achieve our goals, including with respect to ESG. We are focused on further enhancing sustainability of operations and continue to evolve a governance framework that exercises appropriate oversight of responsibilities at all levels throughout the company. Our board-level ESG Committee, with active management participation, will oversee our ESG initiatives and priorities.

11

Government Regulation and Incentives

State, regional and local regulations for installing EV charging stations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may include permitting requirements, inspection requirements, licensing of contractors, and certifications. Compliance with such regulations may cause installation delays.

Currently, we apply charging fees by the kWh for our services in most states that permit this policy, while there are a handful of other states that only allow charging fees on hourly and by session for our services (Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Tennessee and Wisconsin).

We intend to continue to vigorously seek additional grants, loans, rebates, subsidies, and incentives as cost-effective means of reducing our capital investment in the promotion, purchase and installation of charging stations where applicable. We expect these incentives, rebates, and tax credits to be critical to our future growth. Additionally, some incentives are currently offered to encourage electric vehicle adoption at the federal, state and local levels. The Federal Government provides a personal income tax credit for qualified buyers and plug-in electric vehicles, with a maximum of $7,500, depending on vehicle weight and battery capacity, income levels, and battery sourcing origin. States such as California, Colorado, Delaware, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island offer various rebates, grants, and tax credits to incentivize EV and EVSE purchases.

CESQG

As a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (“CESQG”), we generate a limited quantity of hazardous waste, mainly solvent contaminated wipes, which are transported to local solid waste facilities. Scrapped electronic boards are transported to a local recycler. A CESQG of hazardous waste is defined as a generator that:

produces no more than 100 kg (220 lbs.) of hazardous waste per calendar month;

produces no more than 1 kg (2.2 lbs.) of acute hazardous waste per calendar month;

never accumulates more than 1,000 kg (2,204 lbs.) of hazardous waste at any one time; and

never accumulates more than 1 kg (2.2 lbs.) of acute hazardous waste at any one time.

The use of our machinery and equipment must comply with the following applicable laws and regulations, including safety and environmental regulations:

General Safety for All Employees – Includes health hazard communication, emergency exit plans, electrical safety-related work practices, office safety, and hand-powered tools.

Technicians and Engineers – Only authorized persons (technicians and engineers) perform product testing and repair in the facility’s production and engineering areas, including those engineers involved in field service work. Regulations include control of hazardous energy and personal protective equipment.

Logisticians – Includes forklift operations performed only by certified shipping/receiving personnel and material handling and storage.

We fully comply with the general industry category’s environmental regulations applicable to us as a CESQG.

OSHA

We are subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended (“OSHA”). OSHA establishes specific employer responsibilities, including maintaining a workplace free of recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious injury, compliance with standards promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and various recordkeeping, disclosure and procedural requirements. Multiple standards, including standards for notices of hazards, safety in excavation and demolition work and the handling of asbestos, may apply to our operations. We are in full compliance with OSHA regulations.

NEMA

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”) is the association of electrical equipment and medical imaging manufacturers. NEMA provides a forum for developing technical standards in the industry and users’ best interests, advocating industry policies on legislative and regulatory matters, and collecting, analyzing, and disseminating industry data. All products distributed within the U.S. adhere to the applicable NEMA standards governing such merchandise.

12

Waste Handling and Disposal

We are subject to laws and regulations regarding the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and solid wastes, including electronic wastes and batteries. These laws generally regulate the generation, storage, treatment, transportation, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and may impose strict, joint, and several liability for the investigation and remediation of areas where hazardous substances may have been released or disposed. For instance, CERCLA, also known as the Superfund law, in the United States and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include current and prior owners or operators of the site where the release occurred as well as companies that disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at the site. Under CERCLA, these persons may be subject to joint and several strict liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some instances, third parties to act in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. We may handle hazardous substances within the meaning of CERCLA, or similar state statutes, in the course of ordinary operations and, as a result, may be jointly and severally liable under CERCLA for all or part of the costs required to clean up sites at which these hazardous substances have been released into the environment.

We also generate solid wastes, which may include hazardous wastes that are subject to the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes. While RCRA regulates both solid and hazardous wastes, it imposes strict requirements on the generation, storage, treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous wastes. Certain components of our products are excluded from RCRA’s hazardous waste regulations, provided certain requirements are met. However, if these components do not meet all the established requirements for the exclusion, or if the requirements for the exclusion change, we may be required to treat such products as hazardous waste, which are subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements. Any such changes in the laws and regulations, or our ability to qualify the materials it uses for exclusions under such laws and regulations, could adversely affect our operating expenses.

Similar laws exist in other jurisdictions where we operate. Additionally, in the EU, we are subject to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (“WEEE Directive”). The WEEE Directive provides for the creation of a collection scheme where consumers return waste electrical and electronic equipment to merchants, such as Blink Charging. If we fail to properly manage such waste electrical and electronic equipment, it may be subject to fines, sanctions, or other actions that may adversely affect on our financial operations.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, unfair competition and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish, maintain and protect our proprietary rights. Our success depends partly on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for our products, technology and know-how, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others, and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights.

As of December 31, 2023, we had four active patents issued in the United States (in the name of our subsidiary Ecotality, Inc.). These patents relate to various EV charging station designs. We intend to regularly assess opportunities for seeking patent protection for those aspects of our technology, designs, and methodologies that we believe provide a meaningful competitive advantage. If we cannot do so, our ability to protect our intellectual property or prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights may be impaired.

Human Capital Resources

Our experienced employees and management team are some of our most valuable resources, and we are committed to attracting, motivating, and retaining top talent. As of December 31, 2023, we had 706 employees, including 684 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Our success is directly related to the satisfaction, growth, and development of our employees. We strive to offer a work environment where employee opinions are valued and allow our employees to use and augment their professional skills. To achieve our human capital goals, we intend to remain focused on providing our personnel with entrepreneurial opportunities to expand our business within their areas of expertise and continue to provide our personnel with personal and professional growth. We emphasize several measures and objectives in managing our human capital assets, including, among others, employee safety and wellness, talent acquisition and retention, employee engagement, development and training, diversity and inclusion, and compensation and pay equity.

Diversity and Inclusion and Ethical Business Practices. We believe that a company culture focused on diversity and inclusion is a crucial driver of creativity and innovation. We also believe that diverse and inclusive teams make better business decisions, ultimately driving better business outcomes. We are committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing high-performing, innovative, and engaged employees with diverse backgrounds and experiences. This commitment includes providing equal access to, and participation in, equal employment opportunities, programs, and services without regard to race, religion, color, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, stereotypes, or assumptions based thereon. We welcome and celebrate our teams’ differences, experiences, and beliefs, and we are investing in a more engaged, diverse, and inclusive workforce.

13

We also foster a strong corporate culture that promotes high standards of ethics and compliance for our business, including policies that set forth principles to guide employee, officer, director, and vendor conduct, such as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We also maintain a whistleblower policy and anonymous hotline for the confidential reporting of any suspected policy violations or unethical business conduct on the part of our businesses, employees, officers, directors, or vendors.

Available Information

We maintain a corporate website at www.blinkcharging.com. Our website’s information is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this Annual Report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are made available, free of charge, on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our corporate governance documents, including our code of conduct and ethics, are also available on our website. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we incorporate by reference as identified herein certain information from parts of our proxy statement for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC and will be available, free of charge, on our website. Reports of our executive officers, directors, and any other persons required to file securities ownership reports under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act are also available on our website.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS.

In addition to other information in this Annual Report and in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business as they may have a significant impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. If any of the following risks occurs, our business, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition and future business prospects could be materially and adversely affected, and the trading price of our common stock could decline. Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and stockholders and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of substantial net losses and expect losses to continue in the future; if we do not achieve and sustain profitability, our financial condition could suffer.

We have experienced substantial net losses, and we expect to continue to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of approximately $203.7 million, $91.6 million and $55.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, we had net working capital of approximately $152.0 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $537.7 million. We have not yet achieved profitability.

If our revenue grows slower than we anticipate, or if our operating expenses are higher than we expect, we may not be able to achieve profitability and our financial condition could suffer. We can give no assurance that we will ever achieve profitable operations. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Whether we can achieve cash flow levels sufficient to support our operations cannot be accurately predicted. We may need to borrow additional funds or sell our equity or debt securities, or some combination of both, to provide funding for our operations in the future. Such additional funding may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Our revenue growth ultimately depends on consumers’ willingness to adopt electric vehicles in a market that is still in its early stages.

Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of EVs, and we are subject to the risk of reduced demand for EVs. If the market for EVs does not gain broader market acceptance or develops slower than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be harmed. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements, long development cycles for EV original equipment manufacturers, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles, specifically EVs, include:

perceptions about EV quality, safety (in particular with respect to lithium-ion battery packs), design, performance and cost, especially if adverse events or accidents occur that are linked to the quality or safety of EVs;

the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge and concerns about running out of power while in use;

limitations in the development of battery technology;

14

concerns regarding the stability of the electrical grid;

improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine;

the initial cost of purchasing EVs compared to conventional gas-powered automobiles;
the number, price and variety of EV models available for purchase;
consumers’ desire and ability to purchase a luxury automobile or one that is perceived as exclusive;
EV supply chain disruptions including availability of certain components such as semiconductors, microchips and lithium, availability of batteries and battery materials, and geopolitical and trade issues that may disrupt the EV supply chain;
the environmental consciousness of consumers;
volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline;
consumers’ perceptions of the dependency of the United States on oil from unstable or hostile countries and the impact of international conflicts;
government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;
access to charging stations, standardization of EV charging systems and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost to charge an EV; and
the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate EVs or future regulation requiring increased use of zero emission vehicles.

The influence of any of the factors described above may negatively impact the widespread consumer adoption of EVs, which would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

We received an SEC subpoena and are cooperating with the SEC.

In July 2023, we received a subpoena from the SEC requesting the production of documentation and other information since January 1, 2020, relating to various subjects, including executive departures, related-party transactions, and EV charging station and other discrete disclosure matters. We intend to fully cooperate with the SEC and are in the process of responding to the subpoena. At this point, we are unable to predict what the timing or the outcome of the SEC investigation may be or what, if any, consequences the SEC investigation may have on us. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of the SEC investigation.

Changes to corporate average fuel economy standards may negatively impact the EV market, which would adversely affect our business.

As regulatory initiatives have required an increase in the consumption of renewable transportation fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, consumer acceptance of electric and other alternative vehicles is increasing. To meet higher fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emission standards for passenger vehicles, automobile manufacturers are increasingly using technologies, such as turbocharging, direct injection and higher compression ratios, which require high octane gasoline. If fuel efficiency of vehicles continues to rise, and affordability of vehicles using renewable transportation fuels increases, the demand for electric and high energy vehicles could diminish. If consumers no longer purchase EVs, it would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly.

We expect that our operating results may be subject to substantial quarterly fluctuations. If our quarterly operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. We believe that quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of continuing equipment order delays and chip shortages on our business and future results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

The Covid-19 pandemic impacted global stock markets, economies and businesses. We continue to receive orders for our products, although some shipments of equipment have been temporarily delayed. The global chip shortage and supply chain disruption has caused some delays in equipment orders from our contract manufacturer. As federal, state, local and foreign economies return to pre-pandemic levels, we expect demand for charging station usage to increase; however, we are unable to predict the extent of such recovery due to the uncertainty of the possible recurrence of Covid-19 or its variants. As a result, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact that continuing equipment order delays and chip shortages will have on our business and our future results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

15

War, terrorism, other acts of violence or natural or man-made disasters may affect the markets in which we operate, our customers, our delivery of products and customer service, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Our business may be adversely affected by instability, disruption or destruction in a geographic region in which we operate, regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil insurrection or social unrest, and natural or man-made disasters, including famine, flood, fire, earthquake, storm or pandemic events and spread of disease. Such events may cause customers to suspend their decisions on using our services, make it impossible for us to render our services, cause restrictions, and give rise to sudden significant changes in regional and global economic conditions and cycles. These events also pose significant risks to our personnel and to physical facilities and operations, which could materially adversely affect our financial results.

Further, the current Russia-Ukraine and Middle East conflicts have created extreme volatility in the global financial markets and are expected to have further global economic consequences, including disruptions of the global supply chain and energy markets and heightened volatility of commodity and raw material prices. In addition, recently there has been increasing geopolitical tension between China and Taiwan that may affect future shipments from Taiwan based electronics suppliers for certain of our EV chargers. Any such volatility or disruptions may have adverse consequences for us or the third parties on whom we rely. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, including as a result of political unrest or war, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult to obtain in a timely manner or on favorable terms, more costly or more dilutive. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by any negative impact on the global economy, capital markets or commodity and raw material prices resulting from the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, the recent geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan or any other geopolitical tensions.

We rely on a limited number of vendors for our EV charging equipment and related support services. The loss of any of these partners would negatively affect our business.

We rely on a limited number of vendors for design, testing and manufacturing of EV charging equipment which is generally sole-sourced with respect to components as well as aftermarket maintenance and warranty services. The reliance on a limited number of vendors increases our risks, since we do not currently have proven reliable alternative or replacement vendors beyond these key parties. In the event of production interruptions or supply chain disruptions including but not limited to availability of certain key components such as semiconductors, we may not be able to take advantage of increased production from other sources or develop alternate or secondary vendors without incurring material additional costs and substantial delays. Therefore, our business would be adversely affected if one or more of our vendors is impacted by any interruption at a particular location.

As the demand for public charging increases, the EV charging equipment vendors may not be able to dedicate sufficient supply chain, production or sales channel capacity to keep up with the required pace of charging infrastructure expansion. In addition, as the EV market grows, the industry may be exposed to deteriorating design requirements, undetected faults or the erosion of testing standards by charging equipment and component suppliers, which may adversely impact the performance, reliability and lifecycle cost of the chargers. If we or our suppliers experience a significant increase in demand, or if we need to replace an existing supplier, we may not be able to supplement service or replace them on acceptable terms, which may impact our ability to install chargers in a timely manner. Thus, the loss of any significant vendor would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may be adversely affected by inflationary or market fluctuations, including impact of tariffs, in the cost of products consumed in providing our services or our cost of labor.

The prices we pay for the principal items we consume in performing our services are dependent primarily on current market prices. We have consolidated certain supply purchases with national vendors through agreements containing negotiated prospective pricing. In the event such vendors are not able to comply with their obligations under the agreements and we are required to seek alternative suppliers, we may incur increased costs of supplies.

EV chargers are impacted by commodity pricing factors, including the impact of tariffs, which in many cases are unpredictable and outside of our control. We seek to pass on to customers such increased costs but sometimes we are unable to do so. Even when we can pass on such costs to our customers, from time to time, sporadic unanticipated increases in the costs of certain supply items due to market or economic conditions may result in a timing delay in passing on such increases to our customers. This type of spike and unanticipated increase in EV charger costs could adversely affect our operating performance, and the adverse effect could be greater if we are delayed in passing on such additional costs to our customers (e.g., where we may not be able to pass such increase on to our customers until the time of our next scheduled service billing review). We seek to mitigate the impact of an unanticipated increase in the cost of such supplies through consolidation of vendors, which increases our ability to obtain more favorable pricing.

Our cost of labor may be influenced by factors in certain market areas. Our hourly employees could be affected by wage rate increases in the federal or state minimum wage rates, wage inflation or local job market adjustments. We do not have a contractual right to automatically pass through all wage rate increases resulting from wage rate inflation or local job market adjustments, and we may be delayed in doing so. Our delay in, or inability to pass such wage increases through to our customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

16

We may need additional capital to fund our growing operations but cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain sufficient capital from potential sources, and we may have to limit the scope of our operations or take actions that may dilute your financial interest.

We may need additional capital to fund our growing operations in the future. The proceeds from our existing at-the-market (“ATM”) program and funds from other potential sources, along with our cash and cash equivalents, may not be sufficient to fund our operations for the near future and we may not be able to obtain additional financing. If adequate additional financing is not available on reasonable terms or available at all, we may not be able to undertake expansion or continue our marketing efforts and we would have to modify our business plans accordingly. The extent of our capital needs will depend on numerous factors, including: (i) our profitability; (ii) the release of competitive products and/or services by our competition; (iii) the level of our investment in research and product development; (iv) the amount of our capital expenditures, including acquisitions; and (v) our growth. We cannot be certain that additional funding and incremental working capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, or that it will exist in a timely and/or adequate manner to allow for the proper execution of our near and long-term business strategy. If sufficient funds are not available on terms and conditions acceptable to management and stockholders, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate further development of our business operations.

Even if we obtain requisite financing, it may be on terms not favorable to us, it may be costly and it may require us to agree to covenants or other provisions that will favor new investors over existing stockholders or other restrictions that may adversely affect our business. Additional funding, if obtained, may also result in significant dilution to our stockholders.

We have global operations and face risks related to health crises that could negatively impact our financial condition.

Our business, the businesses of our customers and the businesses of our charging equipment suppliers could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to a pandemic or other health crisis like the recent Covid-19 pandemic. A significant component supplier of our Blink IQ 200 charging station is located in Taiwan and it, in turn, sources assembly parts from China, which has been particularly impacted. A significant or prolonged outbreak of contagious diseases like Covid-19 and its variants in the human population could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect demand for our EV supply equipment and related networked services and likely impact our operating results. Such events could result in the complete or partial closure of our Taiwan supplier’s manufacturing facility, the interruption of our distribution system, temporary or long-term disruption in our supply chains from Asia and other international suppliers, disruptions, or restrictions on our employees to work or travel, delays in the delivery of our charging stations to customers, and potential claims of exposure to diseases through contact with our charging stations. If the impact of an outbreak continues for an extended period, it could materially adversely impact our supply chain, access to capital and the growth of our revenues.

Climate change may have a long-term impact on our business.

While we seek to partner with organizations that mitigate their business risks associated with climate change, we recognize that there are inherent risks wherever business is conducted. Access to clean water and reliable energy in the communities where we conduct our business, whether for our offices or for our vendors, is a priority. Our major sites in Bowie, Maryland, Los Angeles, California, and Tempe, Arizona are vulnerable to climate change effects. Climate-related events, including the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and their impact on critical infrastructure throughout the United States and in other countries where we have operations, have the potential to disrupt our business, our third-party suppliers and/or the business of our customers, and may cause us to experience higher attrition, losses and additional costs to maintain or resume our EV charging operations.

Computer malware, viruses, hacking, cyberattacks, phishing attacks and spamming that could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service could harm our business and our customers.

Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in our services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, computer hacking, cyberattacks and phishing attacks against online networking platforms have become more prevalent and may occur on our systems in the future. Any attempts by hackers to disrupt our website service or our internal systems, if successful, could harm our business, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation or brand. Our network security business disruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover significant expenses and losses related to direct attacks on our website or internal systems. Efforts to prevent hackers from entering our computer systems are expensive to implement and may limit the functionality of our services. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and services and technical infrastructure may harm our reputation, brand and our ability to attract customers. Any significant disruption to our website or internal computer systems could result in a loss of customers and could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We have previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If our mobile application is unavailable when customers attempt to access it or it does not load as quickly as they expect, customers may seek other services.

17

Our platform functions on software that is highly technical and complex and may now or in the future contain undetected errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Some errors in our software code may only be discovered after the code has been deployed. Any errors, bugs or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after deployment, inability to identify the cause or causes of performance problems within an acceptable period of time or difficultly maintaining and improving the performance of our platform, particularly during peak usage times, could result in damage to our reputation or brand, loss of revenues, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the availability of our platform and to enable rapid releases of new features and products. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems and equipment as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be harmed. If we do not make the necessary investments or upgrades to maintain a network capable of operating on current and future generations of broadband cellular network technology, namely the 4G and 5G systems, our business and operating results could be adversely impacted.

We have a disaster recovery program to transition our operating platform and data to an alternative location in the event of a catastrophe. However, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially lengthen the time our platform is partially or fully unavailable to our user base as a result of the transition. If our platform is unavailable for a significant period of time as a result of such a transition, especially during peak periods, we could suffer damage to our reputation or brand, or loss of revenues any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Growing our customer base depends upon the effective operation of our mobile applications with mobile operating systems, networks and standards that we do not control.

We are dependent on the interoperability of our mobile applications with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Google’s Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade our products’ functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect the usage of our applications on mobile devices. Additionally, to deliver high quality mobile products, it is important that our products work well with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards that we do not control. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks or standards.

If we are unable to keep up with advances in EV technology, we may suffer a decline in our competitive position. The EV industry is characterized by rapid technological change. If we are unable to keep up with changes in EV technology, our competitive position may deteriorate which would materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. As technologies change, we plan to upgrade or adapt our EV charging stations and Blink Networks’ software in order to continue to provide EV charging services with the latest technology. However, due to our limited cash resources, our efforts to do so may be limited. Any failure of our charging stations to compete effectively with other manufacturers’ charging stations will harm our business, operating results and prospects.

We need to manage growth in operations to realize our growth potential and achieve expected revenues; our failure to manage growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect.

To take advantage of the growth that we anticipate in our current and potential markets, we believe that we must expand our marketing operations. This expansion will place a significant strain on our management and our operational, accounting, and information systems. We expect to continue improving our financial controls, operating procedures and management information systems. We will also need to effectively train, motivate and manage our employees. Our failure to manage our growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect.

In order to achieve the above-mentioned targets, the general strategies of our company are to maintain and search for hard-working employees who have innovative initiatives, as well as to keep a close eye on expansion opportunities through merger and/or acquisition.

Our recently announced strategic plan emphasizes achieving positive adjusted EBITDA by December 2024, but there is no assurance that we will achieve such target.

Our recently announced strategic plan to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA by December 2024 is subject to many variables. No assurance can be given that we will be able to achieve that target. Factors that may impact our ability to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA by December 2024 include:

inconsistent and unpredictable net cash flow;
lack of revenue growth;
inability to control operating costs;

18

a decrease in our stock price;
inability to raise growth capital; and
restrictions on our operations due to regulations and other disruptions.

The severity of the factors described above may adversely impact our target to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA by December 2024. In the event that we do not achieve our target, we may become reliant on borrowing additional funds or selling our equity or debt securities, or some combination of both. Such additional funding may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, we may not be able to pursue our current business strategy such as pursuing strategic alliances, expanding into new markets or investing in the development of new technologies.

We may be unable to successfully integrate recent acquisitions in a cost-effective and non-disruptive manner.

Our success depends on our ability to grow our business and enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing customer demands, competitive pressures and advances in technologies. We continue to search for viable acquisition candidates or strategic alliances that would expand our market opportunity and/or global presence. Accordingly, we have previously and may in the future pursue the acquisition of, investments in or joint ventures relating to, new businesses, products or technologies as a part of our growth strategy instead of developing them internally. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage the expanded business following these transactions, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity associated with our acquisitions of SemaConnect, Electric Blue and Envoy Technologies, as well as future acquisitions. Other risks involving potential future and completed acquisitions and strategic investments include:

risks associated with conducting due diligence;
problems integrating the purchased businesses, products and technologies;
inability to achieve the anticipated synergies and overpaying for acquisitions or unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions;
invalid sales assumptions for potential acquisitions;
issues maintaining uniform standards, procedures, controls and policies;
diversion of management’s attention from our core business;
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers, distributors and customers;
risks associated with entering new markets in which we have limited or no experience;
potential loss of key employees of acquired businesses; and
increased legal, accounting and compliance costs.

We compete with other companies for these opportunities, and we may be unable to consummate such acquisitions or joint ventures on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, acquired businesses may have ongoing or potential liabilities, legal claims (including tort and/or personal injury claims) or adverse operating issues that we fail to discover through due diligence prior to the acquisition.

Even if we are aware of such liabilities, claims or issues, we may not be able to accurately estimate the magnitude of the related liabilities and damages. In particular, to the extent that prior owners of any acquired businesses or properties failed to comply with or otherwise violated applicable laws or regulations, failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to their customers, or failed to satisfy legal obligations to employees or third parties, we, as the successor, may be financially responsible for these violations and failures and may suffer reputational harm or otherwise be adversely affected. Acquisitions also frequently result in the recording of goodwill and other intangible assets which are subject to potential impairment in the future that could harm our financial results. If we were to issue additional equity in connection with such acquisitions, this may dilute our stockholders.

We have limited insurance coverage for various liabilities and damages, including potential injuries, and such insurance coverage may not be adequate in a catastrophic situation.

We hold employer liability insurance generally covering death or work-related injury of employees. We hold product and general liability insurance covering certain incidents involving third parties that occur on or in the premises of our company. We maintain business interruption insurance for key locations. Our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover any claim for product liability, damage to our fixed assets, inventory or employee injuries. Any liability or damage to, or caused by, our facilities or our personnel beyond our insurance coverage may result in our incurring substantial costs and a diversion of resources.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel.

Our future success depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Expansion of our business and the management and operation of our company will require additional managers and employees with industry experience, and our success will be highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel and other employees. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel. As our industry continues to evolve, competition for skilled personnel with the requisite experience will be significant. This competition may make it more difficult and expensive to attract, hire and retain qualified managers and employees.

19

We are in a highly competitive EV charging services industry and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete with many of our competitors which are larger and have greater financial resources.

We face strong competition from competitors in the EV charging services industry, including competitors who could duplicate our model. Many of these competitors may have substantially greater financial, marketing and development resources and other capabilities than us. In addition, there are very few barriers to entry into the market for our services. There can be no assurance, therefore, that any of our current and future competitors, many of whom may have far greater resources, will not independently develop services that are substantially equivalent or superior to our services. Therefore, an investment in our company is very risky and speculative due to the competitive environment in which we may operate.

Our competitors may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence and driver price. Further, many of our competitors may be able to utilize substantially greater resources and economies of scale to develop competing products and technologies, divert sales away from us by winning broader contracts or hire away our employees by offering more lucrative compensation packages. In the event that the market for EV charging stations expands, we expect that competition will intensify as additional competitors enter the market and current competitors expand their product lines. In order to secure contracts successfully when competing with larger, well-financed companies, we may be forced to agree to contractual terms that provide for lower aggregate payments to us over the life of the contract, which could adversely affect our margins. Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results.

If a third party asserts that we are infringing upon its intellectual property rights, whether successful or not, it could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses, and our business may be harmed.

The EV and EV charging industries are characterized by the existence of many patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us grows. Our technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. Additionally, although we have acquired from other companies’ proprietary technology covered by patents, we cannot be certain that any such patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Intellectual property infringement claims against us could harm our relationships with our customers, may deter future customers from subscribing to our services or could expose us to litigation with respect to these claims. Even if we are not a party to any litigation involving a customer and third party, an adverse outcome in any such litigation could make it more difficult for us to defend our intellectual property in any subsequent litigation in which we are a named party. Any of these results could harm our brand and operating results.

Any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent us from offering our services to our customers and may require that we procure or develop substitute services that do not infringe.

With respect to any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, we may have to pay damages or stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms, may significantly increase our operating expenses or require us to restrict our business activities in one or more respects. The technology also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense.

The success of our business depends in large part on our ability to protect our proprietary information and technology and enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties.

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, service mark, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which provide only limited protection. We cannot assure you that any patents will issue with respect to our currently pending patent applications, in a manner that gives us the protection that we seek, if at all, or that any future patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Our currently issued patents and any patents that may be issued in the future with respect to pending or future patent applications may not provide sufficiently broad protection, or they may not prove to be enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. Also, we cannot assure you that any future service mark registrations will be issued with respect to pending or future applications or that any registered service marks will be enforceable or provide adequate protection of our proprietary rights.

We endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and contractors and agreements with parties with whom we do business to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology or the reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are competitive with ours or infringe our intellectual property. The enforcement of our intellectual property rights also depends on our legal actions against these infringers being successful, but we cannot be sure these actions will be successful, even when our rights have been infringed.

20

Further, effective patents, trademark, service mark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our services are available over the Internet. In addition, the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights in EV-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending all current and future patents in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing on our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our product candidates, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

The legal systems of many foreign countries do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights. For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license. If we or any of our licensors is forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be adversely affected.

The risk of loss of our intellectual property, trade secrets or other sensitive business or customer confidential information, and disruption of operations due to cyberattacks or data breaches could negatively impact our financial results.

Cyberattacks or data breaches could compromise confidential, business-critical information, cause disruptions in our operations, expose us to potential litigation or harm our reputation. We have important assets, including intellectual property, trade secrets, and other sensitive business-critical and/or confidential information which may be vulnerable to such incidents. While we have a comprehensive cybersecurity program that is continually reviewed, maintained and upgraded, we cannot assure that we are invulnerable to cyberattacks and data breaches which, if significant, could negatively impact our business and financial results.

Risks Related to Legal Matters and Regulations

Changes to existing federal, state or international laws or regulations applicable to us could cause an erosion of our current competitive strengths.

Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations, including those with respect to government incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy, electric vehicles and others. These laws and regulations, and the interpretation or application of these laws and regulations, could change. Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of government subsidies and economic incentives because of policy changes, fiscal tightening or other reasons may result in diminished revenues from government sources and diminished demand for our products. In addition, new laws or regulations affecting our business could be enacted. These laws and regulations are frequently costly to comply with and may divert a significant portion of management’s attention. If we fail to comply with these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities which could adversely affect our business.

There are many federal, state and international laws that may affect our business, including measures to regulate EVs and charging systems. If we fail to comply with these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities which could adversely affect our business.

There are a number of significant matters under review and discussion with respect to government regulations which may affect our business and/or harm our customers, and thereby adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

21

In addition to government and regulatory agency activity, ESG and privacy advocacy groups, the technology industry, and other industries have established or may establish various new, additional, or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on technology companies. Customers may expect that we will meet voluntary certifications or adhere to other standards established by them or third parties. If we are unable to maintain these certifications or meet these standards, it could reduce demand for our solutions and adversely affect our business.

Privacy concerns and laws, or other domestic or foreign regulations, may adversely affect our business.

We are currently subject, and/or may in the future be subject, to numerous privacy and data security laws. For example, some U.S. states, members of the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, and many other jurisdictions in which we operate have adopted some form of privacy and data security laws and regulations which impose significant compliance obligations.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), the Colorado Privacy Act (“CPA”), and the Connecticut Act Concerning Personal Data Privacy and Online Monitoring (“CDPA”) exemplify the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data. Management’s attention may be diverted, and our compliance costs and potential liability may increase as a result of additional national and international regulatory requirements related to data privacy and data security.

Failure to comply with anticorruption and anti-money laundering laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”), and similar laws associated with activities outside of the United States, could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

We are subject to the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, the Anti-Bribery Act, and possibly other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which it conducts activities. It faces significant risks if it fails to comply with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws that prohibit companies and their employees and third-party intermediaries from promising, authorizing, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to foreign government officials, political parties and private-sector recipients for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, directing business to any person or securing any advantage. Any violation of the FCPA, other applicable anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, loss of export privileges, or severe criminal or civil sanctions, which could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, business, operating results, and prospects. In addition, ensuring compliance may be costly and time-consuming, and responding to any enforcement action may result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources, significant defense costs, and other professional fees.

Existing and future environmental health and safety laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs or construction costs and restrictions. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations may result in substantial fines or other limitations that may adversely impact our financial results or the results of operation.

We and our operations, as well as those of our contractors, suppliers, and customers, are subject to certain environmental laws and regulations, including laws related to the use, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes as well as electronic wastes and hardware, whether hazardous or not. These laws may require us or others in our value chain to obtain permits and comply with procedures that impose various restrictions and obligations that may have material effects on our operations. If key permits and approvals cannot be obtained on acceptable terms, or if other operational requirements cannot be met in a manner satisfactory for our operations or on a timeline that meets our commercial obligations, it may adversely impact our business.

Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations can be complex and may be subject to change, such as through new requirements enacted at the supranational, national, sub-national, and/or local level or new or modified regulations that may be implemented under existing law. The nature and extent of any changes in these laws, rules, regulations, and permits may be unpredictable and may have material effects on our business. Future legislation and regulations or changes in existing legislation and regulations, or interpretations thereof, including those relating to hardware manufacturing, electronic waste, or batteries, could cause additional expenditures, restrictions, and delays in connection with our operations as well as other future projects, the extent of which cannot be predicted.

Further, we currently rely on third parties to ensure compliance with certain environmental laws, including those related to the disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Any failure to properly handle or dispose of such wastes, regardless of whether such failure is ours or our contractors, may result in liability under environmental laws, including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), under which liability may be imposed without regard to fault or degree of contribution for the investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites, as well as impacts to human health and damages to natural resources. Additionally, we may not be able to secure contracts with third parties to continue their key supply chain and disposal services for our business, which may result in increased costs for compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

22

The enactment of legislation implementing changes in tax legislation or policies in different geographic jurisdictions including the United States and several European countries could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We conduct business globally and file income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. Our consolidated effective income tax rate could be materially adversely affected by several factors, including: changing tax laws, regulations and treaties, or the interpretation thereof (such as the United States Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 which, among other changes, introduced a 15% corporate minimum tax on certain United States corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain stock redemptions by United States corporations); tax policy initiatives and reforms under consideration (such as those related to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, project, the European Commission’s state aid investigations and other initiatives); the practices of tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we operate; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits or examinations and any related interest or penalties. Such changes may include (but are not limited to) the taxation of operating income, investment income, dividends received or (in the specific context of withholding tax) dividends, royalties and interest paid.

We are unable to predict what tax reforms may be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect such changes would have on our business, but such changes, to the extent they are brought into tax legislation, regulations, policies or practices in jurisdictions in which we operate, could increase the estimated tax liability that we have expensed to date and paid or accrued on our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, and otherwise affect our future results of operations, cash flows in a particular period and overall or effective tax rates in the future in countries where we have operations, reduce post-tax returns to our shareholders and increase the complexity, burden and cost of tax compliance.

Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis.

As disclosed under Item 9A., Controls and Procedures, management concluded that material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting existed as of December 31, 2023. Management identified information technology deficiencies in the design and implementation of change management and user access controls over financial IT applications and underlying records that: support the Company’s financial reporting processes, impact automated process-level and manual controls, and provide the assurance that the data produced by these systems is complete and accurate. The access issues relate to appropriate segregation of duties that would adequately restrict user and privileged access to the financially relevant applications and underlying records to the appropriate Company personnel. Management has considered the IT deficiencies to be a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. During 2023, management reported a material weakness related to the operational effectiveness of its internal controls related to review of the impairment and allocation of goodwill and intangible assets.

Our failure to maintain appropriate and effective internal controls over our financial reporting could result in misstatements in our financial statements and potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities and could cause us to delay the filing of required reports with the SEC and our reporting of financial results. Any of these events could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock. Although we have taken steps to maintain our internal control structure as required, we cannot guarantee that a control deficiency will not result in a misstatement in the future. See “Item 9A – Controls and Procedures – Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” for further information on material weaknesses.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as discussed under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included elsewhere in this Annual Report and in our consolidated financial statements included herein. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, impairment of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets, pension and other post-retirement benefits, product warranty, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, valuation of common stock warrants, and share-based compensation. Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our results of operations to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the price of our common stock.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities

Our common stock price fluctuated significantly in 2023 and is likely to continue to fluctuate from its current level in 2024.

The market price of shares of our common stock fluctuated significantly in 2023 and is likely to continue to fluctuate from its current level in 2024. During 2023 and through March 15, 2024, for example, the closing price of our shares ranged from a low of $2.24 per share to a high of $15.00 per share and, as of March 15, 2024, our stock price was $2.92 per share. Future announcements concerning the introduction of new products, services or technologies or changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors or changes in earnings estimates by analysts, among other factors, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Also, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume volatility in the last year. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many public companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may also cause declines in the market price of our common stock. Investors seeking short-term liquidity should be aware that we cannot provide assurance that our stock price will increase to previously higher levels.

23

A possible “short squeeze” due to a sudden increase in demand of our common stock that largely exceeds supply may lead to further price volatility in our common stock.

Investors may purchase shares of our common stock to hedge existing exposure in our common stock or to speculate on the price of our common stock. Speculation on the price of our common stock may involve long and short exposures. To the extent aggregate short exposure exceeds the number of shares of our common stock available for purchase in the open market, investors with short exposure may have to pay a premium to repurchase our common stock for delivery to lenders of our common stock. Those repurchases may, in turn, dramatically increase the price of our common stock until investors with short exposure are able to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover their short position. This is often referred to as a “short squeeze.” A short squeeze could lead to volatile price movements in shares of our common stock that are not directly correlated to the performance or prospects of our company and once investors purchase the shares necessary to cover their short position the price of our common stock may decline. We believe that the recent volatility in our common stock may be due, in part, to short squeezes that may be temporarily increasing the price of our common stock, which could result in a loss of some or all of your investment in our common stock.

We have a number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants and stock options, an ATM common stock program in place and possible issuance of stock from the acquisition of Envoy Technologies by our subsidiary; the issuance of such shares could have a significant dilutive impact on our stockholders.

As of March 12, 2024, we had outstanding warrants to purchase 1,145,914 shares of common stock and stock options to purchase 936,245 shares of common stock. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue up to 500 million shares of common stock, which would permit us to issue up to an additional approximately 400 million authorized, unissued shares of common stock, after giving effect to the approximate number of shares of common stock currently outstanding and the number of shares reserved for issuance under warrants and stock options.

In connection with the acquisition of Envoy Technologies by our Blink Mobility subsidiary in April 2023, we agreed, in the event Blink Mobility fails to satisfy its deferred payment obligation by April 18, 2025 by issuing its shares (following an initial public offering) or making a cash payment to the former stockholders of Envoy Technologies in an amount of up to $21,000, to issue shares of our common stock (or, at our option, pay in cash or a combination thereof) to such former Envoy Technologies stockholders. The payment of shares of our common stock, if any, would be based on the average of the daily-weighted average prices for such stock on each of the 60 days ending on the day prior to issuance, and such shares would be subject to a leak-out agreement for a period of 120 days following the issuance whereby recipients of such stock may sell no more than up to 1% of such stock held by such recipient on any trading day and up to 20% of such stock during any given month. Accordingly, we may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock in the future, which would dilute the percentage ownership held by existing stockholders.


Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock on the public market could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If there are more shares of common stock offered for sale than buyers are willing to purchase, then the market price of our common stock may decline to a market price at which buyers are willing to purchase the offered shares of common stock and sellers remain willing to sell the shares.

Our Articles of Incorporation grant our Board the power to issue additional shares of common and preferred stock and to designate series of preferred stock, all without stockholder approval.

We are authorized to issue 540,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 40,000,000 shares are authorized as preferred stock. Our Board, without any action by our stockholders, may designate and issue shares of preferred stock in such series as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights, provided it is consistent with Nevada law.

The rights of holders of our preferred stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our shares of common stock. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock. Further, any issuances of additional stock (common or preferred) will dilute the percentage of ownership interest of then-current holders of our capital stock and may dilute our book value per share.

Certain provisions of our corporate governing documents and Nevada law could discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price.

Certain provisions of our organizational documents and Nevada law could discourage potential acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, or limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. For example, our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as amended, permit us to issue, without any further vote or action by the stockholders, up to 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and, with respect to each series, to fix the number of shares constituting the series and the designation of the series, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of the series, and the preferences and relative, participating, optional, and other special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of the series.

24

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will, to some extent, depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us from time to time should downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our business prospects, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders, and such activism could impact the trading value of our securities.

Shareholders may, from time to time, engage in proxy solicitations or advance shareholder proposals, or otherwise attempt to effect changes and assert influence on our Board and management. Activist campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction or seek changes in the composition of our Board could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. A proxy contest would require us to incur significant legal and advisory fees, proxy solicitation expenses and administrative and associated costs and require significant time and attention by our Board and management, diverting their attention from the pursuit of our business strategy. Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control, our ability to execute on our strategy, or changes to the composition of our Board or senior management team arising from a proxy contest could lead to the perception of a change in the direction of our business or instability which may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, make it more difficult to pursue our strategic initiatives, or limit our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If individuals are ultimately elected to our Board with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively implement our business strategy and create additional value for our shareholders. We may choose to initiate, or may become subject to, litigation as a result of a proxy contest or matters arising from a proxy contest, which would serve as a further distraction to our Board and management and would require us to incur significant additional costs. In addition, actions such as those described above could cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based upon temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, and you must rely on increases in the market price of our common stock for returns on your investment.

For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Accordingly, stockholders must be prepared to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation to earn an investment return, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors the Board deems relevant.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 1C.CYBERSECURITY.

Our management recognizes the importance of assessing, identifying, and managing material risks associated with cybersecurity threats, and manages those risks with a t risk-management cybersecurity program. Among other things, these risks include operational risks, financial system risks, physical security risks, intellectual property theft, fraud, extortion, violation of data privacy and security laws, and harm to employees, drivers, site hosts, and property owners. Our capabilities and data, as well as those of our customers, suppliers, partners, and service providers, are critical to our operations and may contain confidential personal information, sensitive business-related information, or intellectual property. These capabilities are also susceptible to interruptions (including those caused by systems failures, cyber-attacks, and other natural or man-made incidents or disasters), which may be prolonged or go undetected. For additional information regarding risks from cybersecurity threats, please refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risk Management and Strategy

We aim to incorporate industry best practices throughout our cybersecurity program and have live data recovery and breach policies in place. Our cybersecurity strategy focuses on implementing effective and efficient controls, technologies, and other processes to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks. Our cybersecurity program is designed to be aligned with applicable industry standards and is evaluated annually, including by our third-party auditors, as a part of our Sarbanes-Oxley information technology control testing procedures.

25

We have processes to assess, identify, manage, and address material cybersecurity threats and incidents. These include annual and ongoing security awareness training for employees, vulnerability scanning, code reviews, annual pen testing of the network and charging stations, and third-party risk assessments, among others. We actively engage with industry groups for benchmarking and best practices awareness. While we are unaware of having been subjected to or impacted by a significant cybersecurity threat to date, we monitor internally discovered or externally reported issues that may affect our products and services and have processes to assess those issues for potential cybersecurity impact or risk.

We also have a process to manage cybersecurity risks associated with third-party service providers. We impose industry-standard security requirements upon our suppliers, including that they maintain an effective security management program; abide by information handling and asset management requirements; and notify us of any known or suspected cyber incident, among others. We obtain and review our third-party service providers’ SOC 1 Type II reports for appropriate information technology controls, including security, to ensure that they adhere to these standards.

Cybersecurity Governance

Cybersecurity is an integral part of our risk management processes and a significant area of focus for the Board of Directors and management team. The Audit Committee is responsible for the cybersecurity component of our IT operations, and the Audit Committee reviews the status of ongoing efforts and incidents at every Board of Directors meeting. In addition to our Board-level Audit Committee, management implemented a Cybersecurity Committee comprised of representatives of upper management, Legal, Marketing, Technology, and Operations to maintain and improve our cybersecurity strategy based on most current industry developments and recent incidents as needed. The Cybersecurity Committee formal meeting occurs biannually, with less formal status update meetings happening more often and as necessary. The members of the Cybersecurity Committee have prior work experience in various roles involving information technology, including security, auditing, compliance, systems and programming. These individuals are informed about, and monitor the prevention, mitigation, detection and remediation of cybersecurity incidents through their management of, and participation in, the Cybersecurity Committee, and report to the Audit Committee on any appropriate items.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES.

We maintain our principal executive offices and international headquarters at 5081 Howerton Way, Suite A, Bowie, Maryland 20715.

In addition, we lease office spaces in Tempe, Arizona; Bowie, Maryland; Los Angeles, California; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Antwerp, Belgium; St Albans, England; Israel; and India (Delhi and Bangalore), from which we operate our current business.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We have been party to certain legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and have been incidental to our business. Certain of the claims that have been made against us allege, among other things, breach of contract or breach of express and implied warranties with regard to our products. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, and we believe we are insured against many such instances, based on past experience and the information currently available, management does not believe that any currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting periods.

On August 24, 2020, a purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Bush v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23527, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Michael Farkas (Blink’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer), and Michael Rama (Blink’s Chief Financial Officer) (the “Bush Lawsuit”). On September 1, 2020, another purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Vittoria v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23643, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the same defendants and seeking to recover the same alleged damages (the “Vittoria Lawsuit”). On October 1, 2020, the court consolidated the Vittoria Lawsuit with the Bush Lawsuit and on December 21, 2020 the court appointed Tianyou Wu, Alexander Yu and H. Marc Joseph to serve as the Co-Lead Plaintiffs. The Co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on February 19, 2021. The Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants made false or misleading statements about the size and functionality of the Blink Network and asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Amended Complaint does not quantify damages but seeks to recover damages on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Blink’s common stock between March 6, 2020 and August 19, 2020. On April 20, 2021, Blink and the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. On November 27, 2023, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court dismissed Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ claims relating to the size of Blink’s charging network and denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. On December 15, 2023, the court entered a scheduling order, setting the case for trial starting on February 24, 2025, among other things. Defendants answered the Amended Complaint on December 18, 2023. The parties are engaged in discovery and have scheduled a mediation for April 3, 2024. The Company wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

26

On September 15, 2020, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Klein (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20- 19815CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against Blink’s Board of Directors and Michael Rama (the “Klein Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The Klein Lawsuit asserts that the Director defendants caused Blink to make the statements that are at issue in the securities class action and, as a result, the Company will incur costs defending against the consolidated Bush Lawsuit and other unidentified investigations. The Klein Lawsuit asserts claims against the Director defendants for breach of fiduciary duties and corporate waste and against all of the defendants for unjust enrichment. Klein did not quantify the alleged damages in his complaint, but he seeks damages sustained by the Company as a result of the defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties, corporate governance changes, restitution, and disgorgement of profits from the defendants and attorneys’ fees and other litigation expenses.

On December 23, 2020, another shareholder derivative action, captioned Bhatia (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20-27632CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court against the same defendants sued in the Klein Lawsuit and asserting similar claims, as well as additional claims relating to the Company’s nomination, appointment and hiring of minorities and women and the Company’s decision to retain its outside auditor (the “Bhatia Lawsuit”). On April 11, 2023, the court consolidated the Bhatia action with the Klein action and dismissed the Bhatia action with prejudice. At the parties’ request, the court has stayed all proceedings until the completion of fact discovery in the Bush Lawsuit or any of the parties gives a 10-day notice that they no longer consent to the voluntary stay. The Company wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

On February 7, 2022, another shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned McCauley (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. A-22-847894-C, was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada, seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against six of Blink’s directors and Michael Rama (the “McCauley Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint filed in the McCauley Lawsuit asserts similar allegations to the Klein Lawsuit relating to the statements at issue in the securities class action and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The McCauley Lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief from the individual defendants, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On March 29, 2022, the Nevada court approved the parties’ stipulation to temporarily stay the McCauley Lawsuit, which expired automatically upon the ruling on the motion to dismiss in the Bush Lawsuit. On December 13, 2023, the Nevada court approved the parties’ stipulation to continue the stay until the close of fact discovery in the Bush Lawsuit or any of the parties gives a 10-day notice that they no longer consent to the voluntary stay. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

27

PART II

 

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESMarket Information

 

Our shares of common stock are traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BLNK.”

Stock Performance GraphSecurity Holders

 

As of March 15, 2024, we had approximately 388 stockholders of record and a greater number of beneficial holders for whom shares are held in a “nominee” or “street” name.

The closing price of our common stock on March 15, 2024 was $2.92 per share, as reported by The Nasdaq Capital Market.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, contractual limitations and other factors that our Board may deem relevant.

Stock Performance Graph

The following shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s other public filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The following stock performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return of the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 index and the Russell 2000 index for the last five fiscal years. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in our common stock and each of such indices on December 31, 20172018 and the reinvestment of dividends, as applicable.

Company/Index December 31, 2018  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2021  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2023 
                   
Blink Charging Co. $100  $108  $2,485  $1,541  $638  $197 
S&P 500 $100  $131  $156  $200  $164  $207 
Russell 2000 $100  $126  $151  $173  $138  $161 

ITEM 6.[RESERVED]

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This section generally discusses the results of our operations for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, please refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the SEC on March 14, 2023. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

 Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences, could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.

Company/Index December 31, 2017  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2021  December 31, 2022 
                   
Blink Charging $100  $38  $41  $950  $589  $244 
S&P 500 $100  $96  $126  $149  $192  $157 
Russell 2000 $100  $89  $112  $134  $154  $122 

U.S. dollars are reported in thousands, except for share and per share amounts.

Overview

We are a leading manufacturer, owner, operator and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services in the continuously growing U.S. and international markets for EVs. Blink offers residential and commercial EV charging equipment and services, enabling EV drivers to recharge at various location types. Blink’s principal line of products and services is its Blink EV charging network (the “Blink Networks”) and Blink EV charging equipment, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (“EVSE”) and other EV-related services. The Blink Networks are a proprietary, cloud-based system that operates, maintains, and manages Blink charging stations and handles the associated charging data, back-end operations, and payment processing. The Blink Networks provide property owners, managers, parking companies, state and municipal entities, and other types of commercial customers, (“Property Partners”) with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations. The Blink Networks also provide EV drivers with vital station information, including station location, availability and fees.

 

428

 

To capture more revenues derived from providing EV charging equipment to commercial customers and to help differentiate Blink in the EV infrastructure market, Blink offers Property Partners a comprehensive range of solutions for EV charging equipment and services that generally fall into one of the business models below, differentiated by who own the equipment and who bears the costs of installation, equipment, and maintenance, and the percentage of revenue shared.

In our Blink-owned turnkey business model, we incur the charging equipment and installation costs. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Networks. In this model, which favors recurring revenues, we incur most costs associated with the EV charging stations; thus, we retain substantially all EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees. Our agreement with the Property Partner typically lasts seven years with extensions that can bring to 21 years.

In our Blink-owned hybrid business model, we incur the charging equipment costs while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity to the Blink Networks. In this model, since the Property Partner incurs the installation, we share a more generous portion of the EV charging revenues with the Property Partner after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees. Our agreement with the Property Partner lasts five years with extensions that can bring the term to 15 years.

In our host-owned business model, the Property Partner purchases, owns and operates the Blink EV charging station and incurs the installation costs. We work with the Property Partner by providing site recommendations, connectivity to the Blink Networks, payment processing, and optional maintenance services. In this model, the Property Partner retains and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees.

In our Blink-as-a-Service model, we own and operate the EV charging station, while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. The Property Partner pays us a fixed monthly fee for the service and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting Blink network connectivity and processing fees. Typically, our agreement with the Property owner typically lasts five years.

We also own and operate EV car-sharing and ride-sharing programs through our wholly owned subsidiary, Blink Mobility. These programs allow customers to share electric vehicles through subscription services and charge those cars through our charging stations.

In pursuit of our commitment to fostering the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) through the establishment and management of EV charging infrastructure on a global scale, we remain steadfast in our dedication to mitigating climate change. This dedication is evidenced by our efforts to diminish greenhouse gas emissions stemming from gasoline-powered vehicles With the goal of being a leader in the build-out of EV charging infrastructure and maximizing our share of the EV charging market, we have established strategic commercial, municipal, and retail partnerships across industry verticals and encompassing numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal sites, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations.

In 2023, we entered into agreements with significant new customers, including the United States Postal Service (USPS), Mack Trucks, McArthurGlen, BluePoint, Mike Albert Fleet Solutions, Royal Farms, John Henry General Store, Moberly Motor Company, Arcos Dorados (McDonald’s Puerto Rico), AAA, Allegiant Stadium (Las Vegas), Village of Tuckahoe (NY), Miami Beach (FL), Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, and Salt Lake City International Airport, that expand our potential for unit sales and deployments. Similarly, in 2022, we entered into agreements with several new significant customers, including Mitsubishi, Cushman & Wakefield, Triple J, Q-Park, Best Buy, UBS, Bosch Mexico, Porsche Puerto Rico and Guatemala, Veris Residential, Greystar, Cambium, and the cities of Atlanta (GA), Rockford (IL), Newton (IA), and Winslow (NJ), Leeds (UK).

As of December 31, 2023, we sold or deployed 89,825 chargers, of which 72,418 were in the Blink Networks (244 Level 1 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 44,673 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 5,569 Level 2 private commercial chargers, 667 DC Fast Charging EV publicly accessible chargers, 36 DC Fast Charging EV private chargers, and 525 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, inclusive of 20,704 chargers pending to be commissioned). Included in the Blink Networks are 5,150 chargers owned by us. The remaining 17,407 were non-networked, on other networks or international sales or deployments (761 Level 2 commercial chargers, 16 DC Fast Charging chargers, 12,224   residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, 2,938 sold to other U.S. networks and 1,468 sold internationally).  The charger units noted above are net of swap-out or replacement units.

29

As reflected in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of $121,691, working capital of $152,033 and an accumulated deficit of $537,723. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we incurred net losses of $203,693, $91,560 and $55,119, respectively. We have not yet achieved profitability.

Recent Developments

February 2023 Underwritten Public Offering

In February 2023, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 8,333,333 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $12.00 per share. We received approximately $100,000 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and approximately $95,000 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. In addition, the underwriters have a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,249,999 shares of common stock from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 ASR filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021, and prospectus supplement dated February 8, 2023. Barclays acted as the sole book-running manager for the offering. H.C. Wainwright & Co., Roth Capital Partners and ThinkEquity acted as co-managers for the offering.

Acquisition

On April 18, 2023, the Company, Mobility and Mobility Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobility (“Merger Sub”), entered into and, after all parties met the closing conditions, consummated the transactions contemplated under an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 18, 2023 (the “Acquisition Agreement”), with Envoy Technologies. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Envoy Technologies, whereupon the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub ceased, and Envoy Technologies was the surviving corporation of the merger and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobility (the “Acquisition”).

Under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the acquisition consideration was up to $35,500, paid as follows: (i) $6,000 in cash paid upon the closing of the Acquisition Agreement (the “Closing”); (ii) a promissory note of Blink Mobility in the principal amount of $5,000 which bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and becomes due 12 months from Closing; (iii) a promissory note of Blink Mobility in the principal amount of $2,000 which bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and becomes due 18 months from Closing; and (iv)(a) in the event of an initial public offering or direct listing of Mobility or Mobility’s successor within 24 months after the Closing (and shares of common stock of the Company are not issued in lieu thereof), $18,500, $21,000 or $22,500 worth of shares of common stock of Mobility or Mobility’s successor, depending on the timing of such offering or listing, (b) in the event there is no initial public offering or direct listing of Mobility or Mobility’s successor within 24 months after the Closing, $21,000 worth of shares of common stock of the Company, or (c) at the Company’s option, a combination of cash and common stock of the Company with an aggregate value of $21,000.

The aggregate purchase price was $30,900 as well as the assumption of working capital deficit of $1,595 (which included closing date cash of $19). The fair value of the consideration paid in the acquisition consisted of: (a) $6,000 in cash ($4,679 was paid at Closing and $1,321 was paid prior to Closing in the form of a note receivable); (b) $6,782 in aggregate promissory notes; and (c) $18,118 in common stock of Mobility subject to the conditions described above.

The payment of shares of common stock of Mobility or Mobility’s successor, if any, will be based on the public offering price per share of such stock in the initial public offering. The payment of shares of common stock of the Company, if any, will be based on the average of the daily-weighted average prices for such stock on each of the 60 days ending on the day prior to issuance thereof.

At-the-Market Offering

On September 2, 2022, we entered into a Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., ThinkEquity LLC, H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (the “Agents”) to conduct an “ATM” equity offering program pursuant to which we may issue and sell from time to time shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 through the Agents, as our sales agents. We currently anticipate using the net proceeds from the sale of its shares of common stock under the ATM program to supplement our operating cash flows to fund EV charging station deployment and growth plans. We also plan to use any remaining proceeds we receive for working capital and other corporate purposes. The amounts and timing of our use of the net proceeds will depend on a number of factors, such as the timing and progress of our EV charging station deployment efforts, the timing and progress of any partnering and collaboration efforts and technological advances.

On November 16, 2023, we entered into an Amendment to Sales Agreement, effective as of November 2, 2023 (the “Amendment”), with the Agents amending the Sales Agreement entered into between us and the Agents. We have provided the Agents with customary indemnification rights, and the Agents will be entitled to an aggregate fixed commission of up to 3% of the gross proceeds from shares sold.

The Amendment revised the term “Registration Statement” as used in the Sales Agreement to our new shelf registration statement on Form S-3, as amended (File No. 333-275123), and revised the term “Prospectus Supplement” as used in the Sales Agreement to our prospectus supplement dated November 2, 2023, relating to the “at-the-market” offering program contemplated by the Sales Agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company sold 30,914,695 shares of its common stock pursuant to the ATM program for gross proceeds of approximately $116,651 and net proceeds of approximately $114,317 after deducting offering expenses. As of December 31, 2023, 31,473,416 shares have been sold pursuant to the ATM program, representing gross proceeds of approximately $124,348. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 8,177,472 shares of common stock aggregate gross proceeds of $25,651 and net proceeds of $25,136.

30

Product and Service Offerings

We offer a variety of EV charging products and services to Property Partners and EV drivers.

EV Charging Solutions

Level 2. We offer a wide range of Level 2 (AC) EV charging equipment, ideal for commercial and residential use, with the North American standard J1772 connector, the North American Charging Standard (NACS) connector, and the Type 2 connector compatible with electric vehicles in Europe and across Latin America.

Our commercial Level 2 chargers consist of the EQ, HQ, MQ, and IQ 200 families and the Series 4, 6, 7, and 8 families, which are available in pedestal, wall mount, and pole mount configurations. The MQ and IQ 200, along with the Series 6, 7, and 8 chargers offer an optional cable management system. Additionally, we offer three residential Level 2 chargers for the Americas: the wall-mounted HQ 200, Series 4, and a smart charging cable, the PQ 150, designed for European markets. Our commercial and residential chargers (except the non-networked HQ 150) can connect to the Blink Networks or a local network. Level 2 charging stations typically provide a full charge in two to eight hours. Level 2 chargers are ideally suited for low-cost installations and frequently used parking locations, such as workplaces, multifamily residential, retail, hospitality, and mixed-use, parking garages, municipalities, colleges/schools, hospitals and airports.

International Products. We offer Level 2 AC and DC products for the rapidly expanding international markets targeted at the residential, workplace, retail, parking garages, leasing companies, hospitality, and other locations. These products are available with the Type 2, GBT, and CCS 2 connectors and include the PQ 150, Series 3 (an ideal product for the 2/3-wheeled vehicles), and the EQ 200.

Mobile Charger. We offer the HQ 200-M Level 2 charger for the mobile/emergency charging market which requires a portable charger to be used for roadside or other use cases where a connection to the electricity grid is not available.

DCFC. We offer a complete line of DC Fast Charging equipment (“DCFC”) that ranges from 30kW to 360kW, supports the ‘CHAdeMo’, CCS1, and NACS connectors, and typically provide an 80% charge in less than 30 minutes. Installation of DCFC stations and grid requirements are typically greater than Level 2 charging stations and are ideally suited for transportation hubs and locations between travel destinations. These include the Series 9 30kW DC Fast Charger that works ideally for the fleet and auto dealership segments and is available in wall and pedestal mount configurations, the Blink 30kW DC Fast Charger that boasts a small footprint providing up to 100 amps of output, and the Blink 60kW – 360kW DC Fast Charger that provides from 140 to 500 amps of power.

Blink Network. The Blink Network is a cloud-based platform that manages our network of EV chargers around the world for remote monitoring, management, payment processing, customer support, and other features required for operating the Blink Networks of EV charging locations.

Blink Charging Mobile App. We offer Blink Charging Mobile Apps (iOS and Android) that provide EV drivers control by giving them improved search capabilities which allows them to search for nearby amenities, as well as chargers by zip-codes, city, business, category, or address, and expanded keyword search. The app also includes payment functionality, eliminating the need for a credit card.

Fleet Management. We offer Fleet Management applications, targeted at commercial, municipal, and federal fleets for planning, managing, and optimizing their departure schedules and energy costs. Our Fleet Management applications can be used as standalone tools or integrated into existing fleet management solutions, which allows Blink to be a flexible and value-added solution within existing software stacks.

31

Key Factors Affecting Operating Results

We believe our performance and future success depend on several factors, including those discussed below:

Competition - The EV charging equipment and service market is highly competitive, and we expect the market to become increasingly competitive as new entrants enter this growing market. Our products and services compete on product performance and features, the total cost of ownership, origin of manufacturing, sales capabilities, financial stability, brand recognition, product reliability, and the installed base’s size. Existing competitors may expand their product offerings and sales strategies, and new competitors may enter the market. If our market share decreases due to increased competition, its revenue and ability to generate profits in the future may be impacted.

Growth - Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of EVs, and we are subject to a risk of any reduced demand for EVs. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is still relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements, long development cycles for EV original equipment manufacturers, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles, and specifically EVs, include perceptions about EV quality, safety (in particular with respect to battery chemistries), design, performance and cost; the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge and concerns about running out of power while in use; improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine; consumers’ desire and ability to purchase a luxury automobile or one that is perceived as exclusive; the environmental consciousness of consumers; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline; consumers’ perceptions of the dependency of the United States on oil from unstable or hostile countries and the impact of international conflicts; government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy; access to charging stations, standardization of EV charging systems and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost to charge an EV; and the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate EVs or future regulation requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles. If the market for EVs does not gain broad market acceptance or develops slower than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

Regulations - Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations, including those with respect to government incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy, electric vehicles and others. These laws and regulations, and the interpretation or application of these laws and regulations, could change. Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of government subsidies and economic incentives because of policy changes, fiscal tightening or other reasons may result in diminished revenues from government sources and diminished demand for our products. In addition, new laws or regulations affecting our business could be enacted. These laws and regulations are frequently costly to comply with and may divert a significant portion of management’s attention. Changes to these applicable laws or regulations could affect business and/or harm our customers, thereby adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Expansion through Acquisitions - We may pursue strategic domestic and international acquisitions to expand our operations. Risks in acquisition transactions include difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses into our operations and control environment, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing clients of the acquired entities, assumed or unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired businesses. Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. If we are unable to integrate or pursue strategic acquisitions, our financial condition and results of operations would be negatively impacted.

32

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared Year Ended December 31, 2022

  For The Years Ended       
  December 31,       
  2023  2022  Difference $  Difference % 
             
Revenues:                
Product sales $109,416  $46,018  $63,398   138%
Charging service revenue - company-owned charging stations  15,646   6,866   8,780   128%
Network fees  7,481   4,370   3,111   71%
Warranty  3,258   928   2,330   251%
Grant and fees rebate  469   296   173   58%
Car-sharing services  3,302   1,268   2,034   160%
Other  1,026   1,393   (367)  -26%
                 
Total Revenues  140,598   61,139   79,459   130%
                 
Cost of Revenues:                
Cost of product sales  72,532   31,428   41,104   131%
Cost of charging services - company-owned charging stations  3,540   1,466   2,074   141%
Host provider fees  9,140   3,935   5,205   132%
Network costs  1,969   1,463   506   35%
Warranty and repairs and maintenance  4,605   2,795   1,810   65%
Car-sharing services  4,356   2,137   2,219   104%
Depreciation and amortization  4,250   3,113   1,137   37%
                 
Total Cost of Revenues  100,392   46,337   54,055   117%
                 
Gross Profit  40,206   14,802   25,404   172%
                 
Operating Expenses:                
Compensation  92,669   60,602   32,067   53%
General and administrative expenses  35,170   27,826   7,344   26%
Other operating expenses  17,825   15,645   2,180   14%
Impairment of goodwill  89,087   -   89,087   N/A 
Impairment of intangible assets  5,143   -   5,143   N/A 
                 
Total Operating Expenses  239,894   104,073   135,821   131%
                 
Loss From Operations  (199,688)  (89,271)  (110,417)  124%
                 
Other (Expense) Income:                
Interest expense  (3,546)  (1,529)  (2,017)  132%
Dividend income  1,909   454   1,455   320%
Gain (loss) on foreign exchange  140   (600)  740   -123%
Loss on extinguishment of notes payable  (1,000)  -   (1,000)  100%
Change in fair value of derivative and other accrued liabilities  8   66   (58)  -88%
Other expense  (22)  (372)  350   -94%
                 
Total Other Expense  (2,511)  (1,981)  (530)  27%
                 
Loss Before Income Taxes $(202,199) $(91,252) $(110,947)  122%
                 
Provision for income taxes  (1,494)  (308)  (1,186)  385%
                 
Net Loss $(203,693) $(91,560) $(112,133)  122%

33

Revenues

Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $140,598, compared to $61,139 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $79,459, or 130%.

Revenue from product sales was $109,416 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $46,018 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $63,398, or 138%. This increase was attributable to increased sales of commercial chargers, DC fast chargers and residential chargers when compared to the same period in 2022.

Charging service revenue for company-owned and operated charging stations was $15,646 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $6,866 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $8,780, or 128%. The increase is due to the increase in utilization of chargers and an increased number of chargers on the Blink Networks.

Network fee revenue was $7,481 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $4,370 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $3,111, or 71%. The increase was attributable to increases in host owned units as well as billings and invoicing to Property Partners during the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.

Warranty revenue was $3,258 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $928 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $2,330, or 251%. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in warranty contracts sold for the year December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.

Grant and fees rebate revenues were $469 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $296 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $173, or 58%. Grant and rebates relating to equipment and the related installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the depreciation expense of the related assets over their useful lives. The decrease in revenue was primarily related to the timing of the amortization of previous years’ state grants/rebates associated with the installation of chargers during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Car-sharing services revenues were $3,302 during the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,268 during the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $2,034, or 160%. These revenues are derived from ride-sharing subscription services through a program with the City of Los Angeles, which was associated with the acquisition of BlueLA in September 2020. Also contributing to the increase in revenues is revenues of $2,743 from Envoy, which was acquired in April 2023.

Other revenue decreased by $367, or 26% to $1,026 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,393 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily attributable to higher Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits generated during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. We generate these credits from the electricity utilized by our electric car charging stations as a byproduct from our charging services in the states of California and Oregon.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues primarily consists of electricity reimbursements, revenue share payments to our Property Partner hosts, the cost of charging stations sold, connectivity charges provided by telco and other networks, warranty, repairs and maintenance services, and depreciation of our installed charging stations. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $100,392 as compared to $46,337 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $54,055, or 117%.

There is a degree of variability in our costs in relation to our revenues from period to period, primarily due to:

electricity reimbursements that are unique to those Property Partner host agreements which provide for such reimbursements;
revenue share payments are predicated on the contractual obligation under the property partner agreement and the revenue generated by the applicable chargers;
cost of charging stations sold is predicated on the mix of types of charging stations and parts sold during the period;
network costs are fixed in nature based on the number of chargers connected to the telco network regardless of whether the charger generates revenue;
provisions for excess and obsolete inventory; and
warranty and repairs and maintenance expenses are based on both the number of service cases completed during the period.

Cost of product sales increased by $41,104, or 131%, to $72,532 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $31,428 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to the increase in product sales of commercial chargers, DC fast chargers and home residential chargers during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022.

34

Cost of charging services for company-owned charging stations (electricity reimbursements) increased by $2,074, or 141%, to $3,540 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,466 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in 2023 was attributable to the mix of charging stations generating charging service revenues subject to electricity reimbursement.

Host provider fees increased by $5,205, or 132%, to $9,140 during the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $3,935 during the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was a result of the mix of chargers generating revenue and their corresponding revenue share percentage payments to Property Partner hosts pursuant to their agreements.

Network costs increased by $506, or 35%, to $1,969 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,463 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was a result of the increase in charging stations on our network and costs incurred related to the upgrading of our network system compared to the same period in 2022.

Warranty and repairs and maintenance costs increased by $1,810, or 65%, to $4,605 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $2,795 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in 2023 was attributable to significant efforts expended to reduce the backlog in warranty and repairs and maintenance cases. As of December 31, 2023, we recorded a liability of $503 which represents the estimated cost of existing backlog of known warranty cases. 

Cost of car-sharing services was $4,356 during the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $2,137 during the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $2,219, or 104%. These costs are from car-sharing subscription services through a program with the City of Los Angeles, which was associated with the acquisition of BlueLA in September 2020. Also contributing to the increase in costs for these services is $2,221 from Envoy, which was acquired in April 2023.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1,137, or 37%, to $4,250 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $3,113 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in depreciation expense was attributable to an increase in the number of EV charging stations and vehicles associated with the car-share services.

Operating Expenses

Compensation expense increased by $32,067, or 53%, to $92,669 (consisting of approximately $70,630 of cash compensation and approximately $22,039 of non-cash compensation) for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $60,602 (consisting of approximately $44,689 of cash compensation and approximately $15,913 of non-cash compensation) for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 was primarily related to increases in personnel and compensation in executive, marketing, sales and operations departments as a result of the anticipated domestic and international growth of our company. In addition, compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 increased due to additional personnel in conjunction with the acquisition of Envoy in April 2023. Also contributing to the increase in compensation expense is (1) non-cash stock-based compensation of approximately $5,500 related to the accelerated vesting of equity award grants and additional stock-based compensation associated with the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the terms of the Former CEO Employment Agreement, as set forth in the Separation and General Release Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2023, between our company and the former Chief Executive Officer; and (2) non-recurring expense of approximately $11,500, consisting of the non-recurring payment of approximately $6,000 to our former Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Former CEO Employment Agreement and a non-recurring bonus expense of $5,500 related to the achievement by our Chief Technology Officer of systems, product and IT-related key performance indicators under his employment agreement, dated April 12, 2021. In addition, compensation expense during the December 31, 2023 period compared to the same period in 2022 increased due to additional personnel in conjunction with the acquisition of Envoy in April 2023.

General and administrative expenses increased by $7,344, or 26%, from $27,826 for the year ended December 31, 2022 to $35,170, for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in accounting, legal, investor/public relations, consulting, software licensing and other professional service expenditures of $6,890. Further, general and administrative expenses increased due to increases in amortization expense of $1,448 primarily related to the acquisition of Envoy in 2023.

Other operating expenses increased by $2,180, or 14%, from $15,645 for the year ended December 31, 2022 to $17,825 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in insurance, software licensing, annual shareholder meeting, rent, and hardware and software expenses of $5,196. Further, increases in travel and vehicle expenses of $480, contributed to the increase in other operating expenses for year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. Also contributing to the increase in other operating expenses were operating expenditures related to the acquisition of Envoy in 2023. The increase in other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 was partially offset by a decrease of $4,257 in expenses related to the 4G network upgrade which was substantially performed during 2022.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we observed certain triggering events, including a decline in our stock price and, as a result, we conducted a quantitative impairment analysis of our goodwill and intangible assets and determined that the fair value of our reporting units were less than the carrying amount and, as a result, recorded an impairment charge of $89,087 related to goodwill and $5,143 related to intangible assets during the 2023 period.

35

Other Expense

Other expense increased by $530 from $1,981 for the year ended December 31, 2022 to $2,511 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in other expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in interest expense of $2,017 associated with the deferred payment from the SemaConnect acquisition as well as an increase in the loss on extinguishment of notes payable of $1,000, partially offset by an increase in dividend and interest income of $1,455.

Provision For Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes was $1,494 during the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $308 during the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company’s statutory federal income tax rate for 2023 and 2022 was 21.0%. The Company’s effective tax rate for 2023 and 2022 was 0.7% and 0.3%, respectively. The increase in the provision for income taxes and the effective tax rate was related to certain subsidiaries which generated net income during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Net Loss

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased by $112,133, or 122%, to $203,693 as compared to $91,560 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in compensation expense and general and administrative expenses in conjunction with current and anticipated growth of our company.

Total Comprehensive Loss

Our total comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $203,183 whereas our total comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $92,822, an increase of $110,361 for the same reasons as noted above related to the increase in our net loss.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We measure our liquidity in a number of ways, including the following:

  December 31, 
  2023  2022 
       
Cash and Cash Equivalents $121,691  $36,562 
         
Working Capital $152,033  $48,962 
         
Debt $38,108  $40,618 

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we financed our activities from proceeds derived from debt and equity financings which were raised in prior periods. A significant portion of the funds raised from the sale of capital stock has been used to cover working capital needs and personnel, office expenses and various consulting and professional fees.

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we used cash of $97,570 and $82,365, respectively, in operations. Our cash used for the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $203,693, reduced by net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $133,566, and by $27,443 of net cash used in changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities. Our cash used for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $91,560, reduced by net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $26,551, and by $17,356 of net cash used in changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $13,240, of which, $4,660 was used as cash consideration for Envoy (net of cash acquired), $7,552 was used to purchase charging stations and other fixed assets, and $1,028 was related to the payment of engineering costs that were capitalized. During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in investing activities was $57,441, of which, $38,338 was used as cash consideration for SemaConnect (net of cash acquired), $11,360 was used as cash consideration for EB (net of cash acquired), $5,249 was used to purchase charging stations and other fixed assets, $2,200 was used as a note receivable to a target, and $294 was related to the payment of engineering costs that were capitalized.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $197,315, of which, $208,865 was attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of common stock from the public offering, $835 was provided by the exercise of warrants and options, offset by $9,292 was used to pay down notes payable, $2,837 was used to pay down our finance lease liability and $256 used to pay down our liability in connection with internal use software.

36

During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $6,393, of which, $7,386 was attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of common stock from the public offering, $220 was provided by the exercise of warrants and options, offset by $681 was used to pay down notes payable, $315 used to pay down our liability in connection with internal use software, and $217 was used to pay down our finance lease liability.

As of December 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents, working capital and an accumulated deficit of $121,691, $152,033 and $537,723, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we generated a net loss of $203,693.

In February 2023, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 8,333,333 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $12.00 per share. We received approximately $100,000 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and approximately $95,000 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. In addition, the underwriters have a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,249,999 shares of common stock from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 ASR filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021, and prospectus supplement dated February 8, 2023. Barclays acted as the sole book-running manager for the offering. H.C. Wainwright & Co., Roth Capital Partners and ThinkEquity acted as co-managers for the offering.

In January 2021, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 5,660,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $41.00 per share. We received approximately $232,100 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and approximately $221,500 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 ASR filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021 and prospectus supplement dated January 7, 2021. We used the net proceeds from the public offering to supplement our operating cash flows to fund EV charging station deployment and, when needed, to finance the costs of acquiring competitive and complementary businesses, products and technologies as a part of our growth strategy, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

We have not yet achieved profitability and expect to continue to incur cash outflows from operations. It is expected that our operating expenses will continue to increase and, as a result, we will eventually need to generate significant product revenues to achieve profitability. Historically, we have been able to raise funds to support our business operations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising significant additional funds in the future. We expect that our cash on hand will fund our operations for at least 12 months after the issuance date of the financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Since inception, our operations have primarily been funded through proceeds received in equity and debt financings. We believe we have access to capital resources and continue to evaluate additional financing opportunities. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds we might raise will enable us to complete our EV development initiatives or attain profitable operations.

On September 2, 2022, we entered into a Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., ThinkEquity LLC, H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (the “Agents”) to conduct an “ATM” equity offering program pursuant to which we may issue and sell from time to time shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 through the Agents, as our sales agents. We currently anticipate using the net proceeds from the sale of our shares of common stock under the ATM program to supplement our operating cash flows to fund EV charging station deployment and our acquisition growth plan. We also plan to use any remaining proceeds we receive for working capital and other corporate purposes. The amounts and timing of our use of the net proceeds will depend on a number of factors, such as the timing and progress of our EV charging station deployment efforts, the timing and progress of any partnering and collaboration efforts and technological advances. As of December 31, 2023, 30,914,695 shares have been sold pursuant to the ATM program representing gross proceeds of approximately $116,651. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 8,177,472 shares of common stock aggregate gross proceeds of $25,651 and net proceeds of $25,136.

37

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We entered into purchase commitments that include purchase orders and agreements in the normal course of business with contract manufacturers, parts manufacturers, vendors for research and development services and outsourced services. As of December 31, 2023, we had purchase commitments of approximately $21,672, which will become payable upon the suppliers’ delivery of the charging stations, services and other related items. The purchase commitments were made primarily for future sales, deployments of charging stations, inventory management planning and other related items, all of which are expected to be received during the next 12-24 months.

Further, we have operating and finance lease obligations over the next five years of approximately $11,418. These operating lease obligations are primarily related to corporate office space, warehousing, and parking spaces related to our ride-sharing services.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures must be in conformity with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and judgments that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the periods presented. We believe that the estimates and judgments upon which it relies are reasonably based upon information available to us at the time that it makes these estimates and judgments. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial results will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates and judgments and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are described below.

The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies or estimates. Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in our Consolidated Financial Statements included at the end of this Annual Report.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue primarily from four different types of contracts:

Product sales – Revenue is recognized at the point where the customer obtains control of the goods and the company satisfies its performance obligation, which generally is at the time it ships the product to the customer or installation of the product.
Charging service revenue – company-owned charging stations - Revenue is recognized at the point when a particular charging session is completed.
Network fees and otherRepresents a stand-ready obligation whereby the company is obligated to perform over a period of time and, as a result, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract term. Network fees are billed annually.
Other Other revenues primarily comprises of revenues generated from alternative fuel credits.

The timing of our revenue recognition may differ from the timing of payment by its customers. A receivable is recorded when revenue is recognized prior to payment and the company has an unconditional right to payment. Alternatively, when payment precedes the provision of the related services, the company records deferred revenue until the performance obligations are satisfied.

Grants, rebates and alternative fuel credits, which are not within the scope of ASC 606, pertaining to revenues and periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related revenue and/or periodic expense are recorded. Grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives over the useful life of the charging station.

Car-sharing services, is accounted for under ASC Topic 842, Leases and pertains to revenues and expenses related to a car-sharing services agreement with the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service. The Company accounts for such rentals as operating leases. The lease terms are included in the Company’s contracts, and the determination of whether the Company’s contracts contain leases generally does not require significant assumptions or judgments. The Company’s lease revenues do not include material amounts of variable payments. The Company does not provide an option for the lessee to purchase the rented equipment at the end of the lease.

The Company is unsure of when the customer will return rented equipment. As such, the Company does not know how much the customer will owe it upon return of the equipment and, therefore, cannot provide a maturity analysis of future lease payments. The Company’s equipment is generally rented for short periods of time (generally a few minutes to a few hours). Lessees do not provide residual value guarantees on rented equipment.

The Company expects to derive significant future benefits from its equipment following the end of the rental term. The Company’s equipment is typically rented for the majority of the time that the Company owns it. The Company recognizes revenue over the contractual period of performance of the subscription which are short term in nature.

38

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value amount of the shares expected to ultimately vest is then recognized over the period for which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from original estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period that the estimates are revised. We account for forfeitures as they occur.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets by monitoring current selling prices of EV charging units in the open market, the adoption rate of various auto manufacturers in the EV market and projected EV charging utilization at various public EV charging stations throughout our network in determining fair value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes pursuant to the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Operating Leases

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use an incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at commencement date. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of consideration paid for an acquired entity over the fair value of the amounts assigned to assets acquired, including other identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed in a business combination. To determine the amount of goodwill resulting from a business combination, the company performs an assessment to determine the acquisition date fair value of the acquired company’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities.

Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. An entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. These qualitative factors include: macroeconomic and industry conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events. If the entity determines that this threshold is met, then the company may apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The company determines fair value through multiple valuation techniques and weights the results accordingly. The company is required to make certain subjective and complex judgments in assessing whether an event of impairment of goodwill has occurred, including assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of its reporting units. The company has elected to perform its annual goodwill impairment review on November 1 of each year.

39

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For a description of our recently issued accounting standards, see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Foreign Currency Risk

We have foreign currency risks related to its revenue and operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, causing both its revenue and its operating results to be impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates. Gains or losses from the revaluation of certain cash balances, accounts receivable balances and intercompany balances that are denominated in these currencies impact our net loss. A hypothetical decrease in all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar of 1% would not result in a material foreign currency loss on foreign-denominated balances, as of December 31, 2023. As our foreign operations expand, its results may be more materially impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which it does business. At this time, we do not enter into financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency exchange risk.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Annual Report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost- benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Management has designed disclosure controls and procedures that reasonably enable the management to deliberate and take timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by the SEC Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023, due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described below.

However, after giving full consideration to the material weaknesses described below, and the additional analyses and other procedures the Company performed to ensure that its consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, Blink’s management has concluded that its consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods disclosed in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to our company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

40

As permitted by SEC guidance for newly acquired businesses, because it was not possible to complete an effective assessment of the acquired company’s controls by year-end, management has excluded Envoy Technologies Inc., from its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting and changes therein from the date of such acquisition through December 31, 2023. Envoy’s total assets and total revenues represent approximately 1% and 2% respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts of Blink Charging Co. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023, because of the material weaknesses reported below.

Management identified information technology deficiencies in the design and implementation of change management and user access controls over financial IT applications and underlying records that: support the Company’s financial reporting processes, impact automated process-level and manual controls, and provide the assurance that the data produced by these systems is complete and accurate. The access issues relate to appropriate segregation of duties that would adequately restrict user and privileged access to the financially relevant applications and underlying records to the appropriate Company personnel. Management has considered the IT deficiencies to be a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023.
During 2023, management reported a material weakness related to the operational effectiveness of its internal controls related to review of the impairment and allocation of goodwill and intangible assets.

Remediation efforts have begun; the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. The Company expects that the remediation of these material weaknesses will be completed during 2024.

Remediation in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During 2023

In 2022, the Company identified certain design deficiency which resulted in a failure to detect a miscalculation of a certain non-cash share-based compensation transaction on a timely basis. As a result of the internal controls initiatives referenced above, the 2022 reported material weakness has been remediated in 2023 and is operating effectively.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During 2023, management continued to implement improvements to the Company’s internal control system including expanding our internal control assessments to the Company’s 2022 acquisitions Throughout the year, from executive management down, a strong commitment was made to the importance of internal control and to create and maintain an infrastructure to support the Company’s compliance program. The Audit Committee was actively engaged and exercised continuous oversight throughout the process. Further, management and the Audit Committee fostered open and regular dialogue with the Company’s external auditors. Internal control, particularly those relating to subjective judgements, were strengthened and, when possible automated and centralized.

Except as described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over the financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2023 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

41

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Blink Charging Co.

Adverse Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Blink Charging Co. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described in the following paragraph on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”:

The Company's change management and access controls were not designed and implemented effectively to ensure: 1) IT program and data changes affecting the Company’s financial IT applications and underlying records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately to validate that data produced by these IT applications were complete and accurate, and 2) appropriate segregation of duties that would adequately restrict user and privileged access to the financially relevant applications and underlying records to the appropriate Company personnel.
Due to the pervasive nature of these deficiencies other IT general controls, automated process-level, and manual controls that are dependent upon the information derived from such financially relevant applications were also determined to be ineffective.
Ineffective operation of management review controls over allocation of proceeds to intangible assets and goodwill and the evaluation of potential impairment for goodwill and other intangible assets.

These deficiencies, combined with inadequate review controls, created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement, either individually or in the aggregate, of the consolidated financial statements might not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and represent material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the fiscal 2023 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 18, 2024 on those financial statements.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023 and our report thereon dated March 18, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Explanatory Paragraph – Excluded Subsidiary

As described in “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”, management has excluded its wholly owned subsidiary, Envoy Technologies, Inc., from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 because the entity was acquired by the Company as the result of a business combination during 2023. We have also excluded Envoy Technologies, Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The subsidiary’s combined total assets and total revenues represent approximately 1% and 2%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Marcum llp

New York, NY

March 18, 2024

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.

During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2023, none of the Company’s directors or officers adopted, modified, or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, in each case as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

42

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

 

Directors

The following information describesInformation required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the biographical information, offices held, other business directorships, additional director experience, qualifications, attributes and skills and the class and term2024 Annual Meeting of eachStockholders to be filed within 120 days of our directors, as of April 28, 2023. There are no arrangements or understandings between a director and any other person pursuant to which such director was or is to be selected as a director or nominee.

Director Age Director Since Audit Committee 

Compensation

Committee

 

Nominating

and

Corporate Governance Committee

 

Environmental,

Social and Governance Committee

Michael D. Farkas 51 2010        
             
Brendan S. Jones 59 2021        
             
Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy 63 2022        
             
Louis R. Buffalino 67 2019   X X (Chair) X
             
Jack Levine 72 2019 X (Chair) X X  
             
Kenneth R. Marks 77 2020 X     X (Chair)
             
Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans 51 2019 X X (Chair)    
             
Cedric L. Richmond 49 2022       X

Michael D. Farkas

Michael D. Farkas has served as our Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to July 2015 and from October 2018 to date. Mr. Farkas has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) since 2010 and has been the Executive Chairman of the Board since January 2015. Mr. Farkas is the founder and manager of FGI, a privately-held investment firm. Mr. Farkas is the founder, a director and the Chief Executive Officer of Balance Labs, Inc., a consulting firm that provides business development and consulting services to startup development stage businesses. Mr. Farkas also currently holds the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlas Group, in which its subsidiary, Atlas Capital Services, was a broker-dealer that had raised capital for a number of public and private clients until it withdrew its FINRA registration in 2007. Over the last 25 years, Mr. Farkas has established a successful track record as a principal investor across a variety of industries, including telecommunications, technology, aerospace and defense, agriculture, and automotive retail. Mr. Farkas attended Brooklyn College where he studied Finance.

As the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and one of our largest stockholders, Mr. Farkas leads the Board and guides our company. Mr. Farkas brings extensive industry knowledge of the Company and a deep background in emerging growth companies and capital market activities. His service as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer creates a critical link between management and the Board.

Brendan S. Jones

Brendan S. Jones joined our company as Chief Operating Officer in April 2020 and became our President and was elected a member of our Board in February 2021. Mr. Jones has more than 30 years of day-to-day operational experience in the electric vehicle (“EV”) charging, automotive and alternative energy industries and in-depth knowledge in the areas of EV charging sales, technology and infrastructure development. Prior to joining our company, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of Electrify America, LLC, the United States-based EV subsidiary of Volkswagen Group AG, from September 2016 to March 2020. Mr. Jones was Electrify America’s first employee and is credited with building Electrify America from its original startup concept into one of the largest ultrafast EV charging companies in the world, establishing strategy, design implementation and management teams at Electrify America, negotiating numerous contracts for charging services with leading carmakers, retail property owners and EV infrastructure companies, and managing the installation and servicing of thousands of charging stations.

5

Mr. Jones previously served as Vice President - OEM Strategy and Business Development of EVgo, a subsidiary of NRG Energy which operates EV fast charging stations, from March 2014 to September 2016. Prior to these positions, Mr. Jones served in various leadership positions with Nissan North America, Inc., from April 1994 to March 2015. At Nissan, he assumed increasingly senior positions including Director - Electric Vehicle Sales Operations and Infrastructure Development from 2013 to 2015, Director - Chief Marketing Manager EV Model Line from 2011 to 2013, and Senior Manager of the Nissan LEAF Launch Team from 2009 to 2011. Mr. Jones has been a board member of several EV industry groups including the Electric Drive Transportation Association, a trade association that promotes electric drive technologies and infrastructure (2015 and 2016), and the ROEV Association, a collaboration between EV charging network operators and electric vehicle manufacturers to allow drivers to charge at multiple stations using one card (from 2015 to 2017). Mr. Jones received B.A. and M.A. degrees from George Mason University and a professional certificate from Vanderbilt University for completing the accelerated executive leadership development program.

Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy

Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy has served as the Chief Executive Officer of SemaConnect, LLC, a Blink subsidiary, since July 2022 and became a member of our Board in July 2022. Mr. Reddy founded SemaConnect, Inc. in October 2007 and served as a director and its Chief Executive Officer until the closing of our acquisition of SemaConnect, Inc. in June 2022. Mr. Reddy co-founded CBay Systems Ltd., a healthcare business process outsourcing company, and served as its Chief Operating Officer and President from August 1998 to September 2008. Mr. Reddy received a B.A. degree from St. Joseph’s College in Bangalore, India.

Mr. Reddy’s expertise in information technology gained through his long tenure as a founder and senior executive in the EV industry and his extensive experience with embedded systems and server side IT make him well qualified to be a member of our Board.

Louis R. Buffalino

Louis R. Buffalino became a member of our Board in December 2019. He has been a senior real estate executive for more than 35 years. He is currently an independent real estate consultant and broker operating as Veritas Realty Advisors, since June 2022. Prior to that, he served as a Senior Vice President of Cushman & Wakefield, a global real estate services firm, from 2012 through May 2022. At Cushman & Wakefield, Mr. Buffalino was responsible for institutional property investment sales, site selection, lease negotiations and corporate consulting. Additionally, he served as the Chief Operating Officer and a director of CleanTech Acquisition Corp., a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company, from June 2020 until it was acquired in September 2022. Mr. Buffalino has previously worked at other commercial real estate services and investment firms including serving as a Senior Vice President at Jones Lang LaSalle from 2009 to 2012, a First Vice President at CB Richard Ellis from 2002 to 2009, and a First Vice President at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette/Credit Suisse in its corporate real estate group from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Buffalino received a B.A. degree from Providence College.

Mr. Buffalino has extensive experience and contacts working with large property owners, managers and developers, making his input invaluable to the Board’s discussions of EV charging station deployment decisions, and our ongoing sales, marketing and growth strategies.

Jack Levine

Jack Levine became a member of our Board in December 2019 where he serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee. He has been the President of Jack Levine, PA, a certified public accounting firm, since 1984. For more than 35 years, he has been advising corporations on financial and accounting matters and serving as an independent director on numerous boards, frequently as head of their audit committees. Since June 2021, Mr. Levine has served as a director, chairman of the audit committee and as a qualified SEC financial expert of Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc., a public company specializing in the acquisition, ownership and triple net leasing of skilled nursing facilities and other post-acute healthcare properties, and EZFill Holdings Inc., a publicly traded app-based mobile-fueling company. In addition, Mr. Levine is currently a director and chairman of the audit committee of SignPath Pharma, Inc., a development-stage biotechnology company, since 2010.

6

Mr. Levine’s previous board memberships included Provista Diagnostics, Inc., a cancer detection and diagnostics company focused on women’s cancer, from 2011 to 2018 (also serving as chairman of its audit committee); Biscayne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company discovering and developing novel therapies based on growth hormone-releasing hormone analogs; Grant Life Sciences, a research and development company focused on early detection of cervical cancer, from 2004 to 2008 (also serving as chairman of its audit committee); and Pharmanet, Inc., a global drug development services company providing a comprehensive range of services to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, generic drug and medical device companies, from 1999 to 2007 (also serving as chairman of its audit and other committees). Mr. Levine also served as a director and audit committee chair of Beach Bank, a community bank, from 2000 to 2006, Prairie Fund, a mutual fund, from 2000 to 2006, and Bankers Savings Bank, a community bank, from 1996 to 1998, and was a member of the audit committee of Miami Dade County School Board, the nation’s third largest school system, from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Levine is a certified public accountant licensed by the States of Florida and New York. He also is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, Association of Audit Committee Members and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Levine received a B.A. degree from Hunter College of the City University of New York and an M.A. from New York University.

Mr. Levine demonstrates extensive knowledge of complex financial, accounting, tax and operational issues highly relevant to our growing business. Through his decades of service as a board member, he also brings significant working experience in corporate controls and governance.

Kenneth R. Marks

Kenneth R. Marks became a member of our Board in March 2020. He is currently the President of KRM Energy Advisors LLC. Mr. Marks was previously Managing Director and Head of Power, Utilities and Renewables for the Americas for HSBC from 2011 to 2016, in which he was responsible for leading the bank’s investment banking and commercial banking services for clients in the sector in North and South America, including the provision of strategic advice, financing and other bank products. Prior to HSBC, he worked for Morgan Stanley as an investment banker for 33 years in increasingly senior roles, including as Managing Director in the Global Power and Utility Group. In this role, Mr. Marks provided the full range of Morgan Stanley’s banking products to clients in the sector, including strategic advice, debt and equity financing, and derivatives/hedging. Mr. Marks’ experience at Morgan Stanley also included participation in specialized groups at the investment bank focusing on mergers and acquisitions, financial restructuring, project financing, valuations and corporate finance. Throughout his tenure at Morgan Stanley, Mr. Marks was based in the United States, except for three years when he was based in Hong Kong as Head of M&A and Project Finance for the region.

Mr. Marks is a member of the Board of Directors of the Coalition for Green Capital, a non-profit entity whose mission is to halt climate change by accelerating investment in clean energy technologies through the creation and implementation of Green Bank finance institutions, and he had served as Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Marks received a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Bucknell University, an M.B.A. in industrial management from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and a Ph.D. in finance from New York University. For a number of years, Mr. Marks served on the faculty at NYU teaching courses in its M.B.A. program and has published articles in numerous journals including Public Utilities Fortnightly, Energy Biz and Harvard Business Review.

Mr. Marks’ experience in the power, utility and renewable area and his leadership positions at a leading global investment bank, one of the largest global commercial banks and at a non-profit entity applicable to the sector makes his input invaluable to our Board’s discussions of the EV charging and alternative energy markets. He also brings transactional expertise in mergers and acquisitions and capital markets.

Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans

Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans became a member of our Board in December 2019. He is an experienced entrepreneur in Europe. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Incision Group, a medtech scale-up in team performance and education, since January 2017, and co-founded and led ScaleUpNation, a growth accelerator for ventures with large scale-up potential, from February 2016 to January 2017, each in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

7

In February 2009, Mr. van Montfrans founded NewMotion, which grew to become the leading service provider for electric vehicles in Europe, with the largest network of charging stations. Mr. van Montfrans served as Chief Executive Officer and International Business Development Director of NewMotion until February 2016, shortly before the company was purchased by Royal Dutch Shell. Prior to NewMotion, Mr. van Montfrans was a partner of H2 Equity Partners, an investment firm in Amsterdam, from September 2002 to February 2009, an engagement manager at McKinsey & Co. in Amsterdam from May 1999 to September 2002, and an associate in the mergers and acquisitions group of J.P. Morgan in London. Mr. van Montfrans received a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands.

Mr. van Montfrans’ day-to-day operational leadership of NewMotion and in-depth knowledge of the EV charging market and broad range of companies in the industry (with a focus on Western Europe) make him well qualified to be a member of the Board.

Cedric L. Richmond

Cedric L. Richmond became a member of our Board in August 2022. He is currently the President of Richmond & Company, LLC, a governmental affairs consulting firm founded in May 2022. Prior to founding Richmond & Company, Mr. Richmond served as a Senior Advisor to the Executive Office of the President of the United States and Director of the White House Office of Public Engagement in the Biden Administration, serving in such positions from January 2021 to May 2022.

Prior to joining the Biden Administration in January 2021, Mr. Richmond served as a Member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Louisiana’s Second District, from January 2011 to January 2021. While serving in the United States House of Representatives, Mr. Richmond served on the Committee on Small Business, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Ways and Means. Mr. Richmond was also elected as the youngest person to ever serve as the Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, serving in such position from January 2017 to January 2019. From 2000 to 2010, Mr. Richmond served as a Member of the Louisiana House of Representatives where he represented the 101st District.

Mr. Richmond received a B.A. degree in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting from Morehouse College, a J.D. degree from Tulane University School of Law and is a graduate of Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government Executive Program for Senior Executives in Government. Mr. Richmond has also received honorary doctorate degrees from Southern University and A&M College in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Xavier University in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Mr. Richmond’s extensive experience in government service, insight into regulatory affairs, and his expertise in governance, oversight and ethics gained through service in the public sector, bring unique and valuable perspective to our Board and make him well qualified to be a member of our Board.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers.

New Director

Our Board has elected Kristina A. Peterson as a new member of the Board, she is expected to begin on May 1, 2023.

Kristina A. Peterson

Ms. Peterson, age 59, has been the Chief Executive Officer of Mayflower Partners, a cleantech financial advisory firm, since 2000. Ms. Peterson has led various solar energy investment companies, serving in senior investment, development, operations and asset management roles at Brookfield Renewable Partners (NYSE: BEP) and Terraform Power (Nasdaq: TERP) from 2015 to 2018, and serving in CEO, CFO and other senior management positions at EDF Renewable Energy, Suntech and Greenwood Energy from 2007 to 2015. Prior to that, she was a project and structured finance investment banker for ABN AMRO Bank and Citibank for ten years in the energy, infrastructure and telecom industries. Ms. Peterson has served as a Non-Executive Director, Chair of the Remuneration Committee and a member of the Audit Committee of Invinity Energy Systems PLC (LSE: IES), a utility-scale battery energy storage company, since November 2021. She has been the Co-Chair of Women Corporate Directors Foundation, San Diego Chapter, a global group of women corporate board directors since 2016 and has served on the board of Coalition for Green Capital, a non-profit with a mission to halt climate change by accelerating investment in clean energy technologies through creation of a national green bank since 2019. She was a director of Iteros, Inc., an energy management software firm, from 2015 to 2020, Greenwood Energy in 2014, Solar Electric Industry Association from 2011 to 2012, and Gemini Solar Development Company from 2007 to 2010. Ms. Peterson was awarded her MBA in Finance and Marketing from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and received her B.S. Business Administration from Boston University. She completed additional graduate coursework at MIT Sloan School of Management. Ms. Peterson’s executive leadership experience in energy, technology, investment finance and banking organizations, and board governance experience makes her well qualified to be a member of the Board.

8

Executive Officers

The following information sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of April 28, 2023:fiscal 2023 year-end.

 

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2023 year-end.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2023 year-end.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2023 year-end.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2023 year-end.

43

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)(3) EXHIBITS

Exhibit

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference Filed or Furnished
Number Exhibit Description FormExhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1 Share Purchase Agreement, dated April 21, 2021, between the Shareholders of Blue Corner NV and Blink Holdings B.V. 8-K2.1 05/13/2021  
2.2 Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated April 22, 2022, between the shareholders of Electric Blue Limited, and Blink Holdings B.V. and Blink Charging Co. 8-K2.1 04/26/2022  
2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 13, 2022, by and among Blink Charging Co., Blink Sub I Corp., Blink Sub II LLC, SemaConnect, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC (solely in its capacity as the stockholders’ representative) 8-K2.1 06/14/2022  
2.4 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 18, 2023, by and among Blink Charging Co., Blink Mobility, LLC, Mobility Merger Sub Inc., Envoy Technologies, Inc., and Fortis Advisors LLC (as Equityholders’ Agent) 8-K2.1 04/24/2023  
2.5 Amendment No. 2, dated as of August 4, 2023, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 13, 2022, by and among Blink Charging Co., SemaConnect LLC and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, as Stockholders’ Representative. 10-Q2.2 08/09/2023  
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended most recently on August 17, 2017 10-K3.1 04/17/2018  
3.2 Bylaws, as amended most recently on January 29, 2018 10-K3.2 04/17/2018  
3.4 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series A Convertible Preferred Stock  3.1 04/07/2022  
3.5 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series B Preferred Stock  3.2 04/07/2022  
3.6 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series C Convertible Preferred Stock  3.3 04/07/2022  
3.7 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series D Convertible Preferred Stock  3.4 04/07/2022  
4.2 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated April 9, 2018 8-K4.1 04/19/2018  
4.3 Description of the Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 10-K4.3 04/02/2020  
10.14* 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan Proxy- 08/14/2018  
10.18* Employment Offer Letter, dated February 7, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael P. Rama 8-K10.1 02/11/2020  

44

10.20* Employment Offer Letter, dated as of March 29, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones 8-K10.1 04/20/2020  
10.22* Employment Agreement, dated December 27, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones 8-K10.1 12/29/2021  
10.23* Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Harjinder Bhade 10-K/A10.20 04/29/2022  
10.24* Employment Agreement, dated May 19, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael P. Rama 8-K10.1 05/24/2022  
10.25* Employment Agreement, dated May 19, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and Aviv Hillo 8-K10.2 05/24/2022  
10.26 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2022, by and among Blink Charging Co., the equityholders of SemaConnect, Inc. and each equityholder of SemaConnect, Inc. to which Blink shares were issued 8-K10.1 06/21/2022  
10.29 Sales Agreement, dated September 2, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and the Sales Agents 8-K10.1 09/02/2022  
10.31* Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2023, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones 

8-K

10.1 05/05/2023  
10.32* Amendment to Blink Charging Co. 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan 14AA 06/14/2023  
10.33* Separation and General Release Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2023, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael D. Farkas 8-K10.1 06/23/2023  
10.34* Employment Offer Letter, dated October 30, 2023, between Blink Charging Co. and Harjinder Bhade 8-K10.1 11/03/2023  
10.35 Amendment to Sales Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2023, between Blink Charging Co. and the Agents 8-K10.1 11/22/2023  
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant      X
23.1 Consent of Marcum LLP      X
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer      X
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer      X
32.1** Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer      X
32.2** Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer      X
97.1* Blink Charging Co. Policy for Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation       
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance.      X
101.XSD Inline XBRL Schema.      X
101.PRE Inline XBRL Presentation.      X
101.CAL Inline XBRL Calculation.      X
101.DEF Inline XBRL Definition.      X
101.LAB Inline XBRL Label.      X
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (Embedded within the Inline XBRL document)      X

*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

None.

45

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BLINK CHARGING CO.
Date: March 18, 2024By:/s/ Brendan S. Jones
Brendan S. Jones

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 18, 2024By:/s/ Michael P. Rama
Michael P. Rama

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature AgeTitle PositionDate
Michael D. Farkas 51 Executive Chairman of the Board and
/s/ Brendan S. JonesPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorMarch 18, 2024
Brendan S. Jones 59(Principal Executive Officer) President and Director
/s/ Michael P. RamaChief Financial OfficerMarch 18, 2024
Michael P. Rama 57(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Chief Financial Officer
Aviv Hillo 58
/s/ Aviv Hillo General Counsel, and Executive Vice President of M&A,
Mark Pastrone and Director 58Chief Operating OfficerMarch 18, 2024
Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy63Chief Executive Officer of SemaConnect, LLC, a Blink subsidiary
Harjinder Bhade59Chief Technology Officer

Michael D. Farkas

Mr. Farkas’ biography is set forth under the heading “Directors” above.

Brendan S. Jones

Mr. Jones’ biography is set forth under the heading “Directors” above.

Michael P. Rama

Mr. Rama has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 10, 2020. Prior to joining us, Mr. Rama was an independent financial consultant (not associated with Blink) from July 2019 until he joined us on February 10, 2020. Mr. Rama served as the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NV5 Global, Inc., a Nasdaq Capital Markets-traded company that provides professional and technical engineering and consulting solutions for public and private sector clients in the infrastructure, energy, construction, real estate and environmental markets, from September 2011 to June 2019. At NV5 Global, Mr. Rama was responsible for all accounting, finance and treasury functions and the company’s SEC reporting. From October 1997 until August 2011, Mr. Rama held various accounting and finance roles with AV Homes, Inc. (formerly known as Avatar Holdings, Inc.), including as principal financial officer, chief accounting officer and controller. Mr. Rama has more than 20 years of experience with SEC compliance, establishment and maintenance of internal controls, and capital markets and acquisition transactions. Mr. Rama earned a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Florida and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Aviv Hillo

 

Mr. Hillo has served as our General Counsel since June 2018 and Executive Vice President of Mergers & Acquisitions since May 2022. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hillo practiced law in New York and Israel as a partner in the law firm Schechter Hillo, which he founded in October 2004. Mr. Hillo has also been involved in starting and operating new businesses. He served as Chief Executive Officer of K-Lawyers.com, an internet legal platform, from February 2016 to June 2018, co-founder and general counsel of Ariel Photonics Assembly Ltd., a developer of lasers for defense applications, from September 2007 to September 2015, and in-house counsel at LSL Biotechnologies, Inc., a developer of seeds with long shelf-life qualities, from March 1998 to April 2006. Currently, Mr. Hillo serves on the board of Balance Labs, Inc., a consulting firm that provides business development and consulting services to startup development stage businesses, since February 2017. Mr. Hillo received his law degree from Tel Aviv University in Israel and a Master of Laws degree (Cum Laude) from Fordham University in New York, where he specialized in banking, corporate and finance law. Mr. Hillo is a member of the New York State Bar Association, the Israeli Bar Association and is certified to practice as in-house counsel in Florida. Mr. Hillo is a veteran of the Israeli Defense Forces where he retired as a ranked Major.

 

9

Mark Pastrone

 

In June 2022, Mr. Pastrone joined our company in June 2022 as part of our acquisition of SemaConnect Inc., where Mr. Pastrone had been SemaConnect’s Chief Operating Officer and held other executive level positions since October 2010. In November 2022, Mr. Pastrone was appointed by our Board of Directors to assume the position and duties of the Chief Operating Officer of our company. Mr. Pastrone has more than 25 years of experience building high-tech companies. He led the market launch of SemaConnect’s EV charging solution in the first years of the industry in 2011. As a member of the executive team, Mr. Pastrone played a key role in building the company’s sales, service, technology and production capabilities. In doing so, he helped establish SemaConnect as a stand-out leader in the EV charging space across the multifamily, workplace, public and retail EV charging markets. Prior to SemaConnect Inc., he led the development of several commercial start-ups in the aerospace industry. Mr. Pastrone earned a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and a Masters in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. He also holds an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

 

Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy

 

Mr. Reddy’s biography is set forth under the heading “Directors” above.

Harjinder Bhade

 

Mr. Bhade has served as our Chief Technology Officer since May 2021, where he is responsible for the maintenance of the Blink network and the development of our EV products. He was previously the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President of Engineering at ENGIE North America Inc. (which acquired Green Charge Networks), a sustainable energy storage as a service company, from October 2014 to May 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Bhade was a founder and served as Vice President of Software Engineering at ChargePoint, a global EV charging infrastructure company, from November 2007 to September 2014, where he played a key role in that company’s product development. Mr. Bhade served on ChargePoint’s Advisory Board from September 2014 to May 2021. Mr. Bhade served as the Senior Director of Software Engineering of Carrier Ethernet Solutions at Lucent Technologies from May 2006 to April 2007, the Director of Software Engineering at Riverstone Networks (which was acquired by Lucent Technologies) from January 2003 to May 2006, and the Founder and Director of Software Engineering at Pipal Systems from November 2001 to January 2003. Mr. Bhade received a B.S. degree in computer science from California State University, Chico and an M.B.A. degree from the University of Phoenix.

 

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

Based solely upon our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or representations from certain reporting persons that no year-end Forms 5 were required for those persons, we believe that, during the year ended December 31, 2022, all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except for one late Form 4 filing by Mr. Hillo and one late Form 4 filing by Mr. Farkas, each due to administrative delays.

Corporate Governance

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in December 2013. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all our employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive and senior financial officers. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.blinkcharging.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Conduct and Business Ethics, or waivers of these provisions with respect to executive officers on our website or in our public filings with the SEC. There were no waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in 2022. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be provided without charge to any person submitting a written request to the attention of the Chief Executive Officer at our principal executive office.

10

Board Committees and Charters

The Board has had four standing committees - Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Committee. The Board maintains charters for each of these standing committees. To view the charters of our standing Board committees, please visit our website at https://ir.blinkcharging.com/governance-docs.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is currently comprised of Jack Levine (chair), Kenneth R. Marks ands/ Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans. Our Board has determined that eachMontfrans

Chairman of the directors serving on the Audit Committee meets the requirements for financial literacy under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Levine meets the requirements of a financial expert as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. Our Board has considered the independence and other characteristics of each existing member and each proposed member of our Audit Committee, and our Board believes that each member meets the independence and other requirements of Nasdaq and the SEC. Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq.

March 18, 2024

Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans/s/ Jack LevineDirectorMarch 18, 2024Jack Levine

/s/ Kristina A. Peterson

Director

Our Audit Committee, among other things, is responsible for:March 18, 2024

Kristina A. Peterson 

selecting and hiring the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;
 
helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;
approving audit and non-audit services and fees;
reviewing financial statements and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited and quarterly financial statements, the results of the independent audit and the quarterly reviews, and the reports and certifications regarding internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls;
preparing the Audit Committee report that the SEC requires to be included in our annual proxy statement;
reviewing reports and communications from the independent registered public accounting firm;
reviewing earnings press releases and earnings guidance;
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;
/s/ Mahidhar ReddyDirectorMarch 18, 2024
Mahidhar Reddy
/s/ Cedric L. RichmondDirectorMarch 18, 2024
Cedric L. Richmond

 

reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;
reviewing related party transactions;
establishing and overseeing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of accounting related complaints and the confidential submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and
reviewing and monitoring actual and potential conflicts of interest.

During 2022, the Audit Committee met six times.

11

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is, among other things, responsible for:

reviewing, approving and determining, or making recommendations to our Board regarding, the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
administering our incentive compensation plans and programs;
reviewing and discussing with our management our SEC disclosures; and
overseeing our submissions to stockholders on executive compensation matters.

Our Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans (chair), Louis R. Buffalino and Jack Levine. Our Board has considered the independence and other characteristics of each current and anticipated member of our Compensation Committee. Our Board believes that each member of our Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under the current requirements of Nasdaq, is a nonemployee director as defined by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and is an outside director as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq.

During 2022, the Compensation Committee met 31 times.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Louis R. Buffalino (chair) and Jack Levine. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter. Under our policy, the independent directors of our Board nominate our directors. We also consider any nominations of director candidates validly made by our stockholders. When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following factors:

the current size and composition of the Board and the needs of the Board and the respective committees of the Board;

such factors as character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like;
business experience, diversity and personal skills in technology, finance and financial reporting, marketing and international business; and
other factors that the directors may consider appropriate.

Our goal is to assemble a Board that brings together a variety of skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.

During 2022, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met three times separately and in conjunction with several meetings of the Board of Directors due to the small size of the Board and the committee’s limited activities.

While we do not have a formal diversity policy for Board membership, the Board does seek to ensure that its membership consists of sufficiently diverse backgrounds, meaning a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. In considering candidates for the Board, the independent directors consider, among other factors, diversity with respect to viewpoints, skills, experience and other demographics.

12

Each of our directors is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, an independent non-profit membership organization of corporate board members that provides governance guidelines to assist directors in discharging their responsibilities and ensuring their commitment to the highest standards of corporate conduct, and the Association of Audit Committee Members Inc., a non-profit association of audit committee members dedicated to strengthening the audit committee by developing national best practices for corporate governance, corporate compliance and internal whistleblower policies.

Environmental, Social and Governance Committee

In April 2021, our Board established an Environmental, Social and Governance Committee, which began as a separate standing committee of the Board in July 2021. The principal responsibilities and duties of this committee will be to (i) review and discuss with management the Company’s strategy and policies concerning ESG matters including: environmental, health and safety, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, philanthropy, diversity, equity and inclusion, community issues and other public policy matters relevant to the Company, (ii) oversee the Company’s policies, practices, performance and reporting standards with respect to ESG matters, and (iii) report to the Board current and emerging topics relating to ESG matters that may affect the business, operations, performance or public image of the Company or are pertinent to us and our stakeholders. Additional information regarding the functions to be performed by the ESG Committee is set forth in the ESG Committee Charter.

The ESG Committee is currently comprised of Kenneth R. Marks (chair), Louis R. Buffalino and Cedric L. Richmond. The committee may include one management director.

During 2022, the ESG Committee met three times.

Board Leadership Structure

Michael D. Farkas has been a director since 2010, our Executive Chairman of the Board since January 2015 and Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to July 2015 and again since October 2018. We believe that having one person, particularly Mr. Farkas with his wealth of industry and executive management experience, his extensive knowledge of the operations of the Company and his own history of strategic thinking, serve as both Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is the best leadership structure for us because it demonstrates to our employees, customers and stockholders that the Company is under strong leadership, with a single person setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing our operations. This unity of leadership promotes strategy development and execution, timely decision-making and effective management of our resources. We believe that we have been well-served by this structure.

As described above, five of our Board members are independent. In addition, all of the directors on each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and ESG Committee are independent directors and each of these committees is led by a committee chair. The committee chairs set the agendas for their committees and report to the full Board on their work. As required by Nasdaq, our independent directors meet in executive sessions without management present as frequently as they deem appropriate, typically at the time of each regular in-person Board meeting. All of our independent directors are highly accomplished and experienced business people in their respective fields, who have demonstrated leadership in significant enterprises and are familiar with Board processes. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside our company and industry, while our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our President bring company-specific experience and expertise.

Clawback Policy

The Board has the discretion to clawback any annual incentive or other performance-based compensation awards from executive officers and employees. This clawback applies when certain specified events occur. If the Board determines that compensation related to our financial performance would have been lower if it had been based on the restated financial performance results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment from that executive officer or employee of any portion of such compensation as it deems appropriate after a review of all relevant facts and circumstances.

Director and Officer Derivative Trading Policy

Under our insider trading policy, our executive officers, directors and employees may not engage in derivative trading involving the Company’s securities.

13

Board Meetings

The Board held 17 meetings in 2022 and all of the directors, except Carmen Perez-Carlton, attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which they served during the period for which such director was serving as a director. In addition, the Board of Directors took action three times during 2022 by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting, as permitted by applicable law. We, and the Board, expect all current directors to attend our annual meeting of stockholders barring unforeseen circumstances or irresolvable conflicts. All of the Board members attended last year’s annual meeting. We do not have a written policy on Board attendance at annual meetings of stockholders; however, we do schedule a Board meeting immediately after the annual meeting for which members attending receive compensation.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Risk assessment and oversight are integral parts of our governance and management processes. Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through our Board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight.

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, which is designed to support the achievement of the Company’s objectives, including the strategic objective to improve long-term financial and operational performance and enhance stockholder value. Our Board believes that a fundamental part of risk management is understanding the risks that we face, monitoring these risks and adopting appropriate control and mitigation of these risks.

The Board discusses risks with our senior management on a regular basis, including as a part of its strategic planning process, annual budget review and approval, and thorough reviews of compliance issues in the appropriate committees of our Board. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board are structured to oversee specific risks, as follows:

CommitteePrimary Risk Oversight Responsibility
Audit CommitteeOversees financial risk, including capital risk, financial compliance risk, internal controls over financial reporting and reporting of violations involving financial risk, internal controls and other non-compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Compensation CommitteeOversees our compensation policies and practices to ensure compensation appropriately incentivizes and retains management and determines whether such policies and practices balance risk-taking and reward in an appropriate manner.
Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeOversees the assessment of each Board member’s independence to avoid conflict, determine the effectiveness of the Board and committees, and maintain good governance practices through our corporate governance guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Environmental, Social and Governance CommitteeOversees our policies and practices, and reviews our reporting standards, with respect to complying with evolving ESG matters and disclosures.

The Board also considers our internal control structure which, among other things, limits the number of persons authorized to execute material agreements, requires approval of our Board for matters outside of the ordinary course and includes our whistleblower policy. This policy establishes procedures for the submission by our employees and consultants, on a confidential and anonymous basis, of complaints and concerns regarding our financial statement disclosures, accounting practices, internal controls or auditing matters, or possible violations of the federal securities laws or the rules or regulations promulgated thereunder. Complaints submitted through this policy are promptly routed to the chair of our Audit Committee.

14

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Report

The following Report of the Compensation Committee entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (the “Report”) does not constitute soliciting material and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates the Report by reference therein.

The Compensation Committee of the Board approves and oversees the administration of the Company’s executive compensation program and senior leadership development and continuity programs. The Compensation Committee’s primary objective is to establish a competitive executive compensation program that clearly links executive compensation to business performance and stockholder return. The Compensation Committee considers appropriate risk factors in structuring compensation to discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behaviors and encourage long-term value creation.

Recommendation Regarding Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In performing its oversight function during 2022 with regard to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis prepared by management, the Compensation Committee relied on statements and information prepared by the Company’s management. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Form 10-K/A with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2022, as amended.

This report is furnished by the members of the Compensation Committee.
Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans, Chairman
Louis R. Buffalino
Jack Levine

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy

The primary goals of our Board with respect to executive compensation are to attract and retain talented and dedicated executives, to tie annual and long-term cash and stock incentives to the achievement of specified performance objectives, and to create incentives resulting in increased stockholder value. To achieve these goals, our Compensation Committee recommends to our Board executive compensation packages, generally comprising a mix of salary, discretionary bonus and equity awards. Although we have not adopted any formal guidelines for allocating total compensation between equity compensation and cash compensation, we have implemented and maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our executives’ overall compensation to the achievement of corporate goals.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the power to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities.

In October 2021, as we have grown and added depth to our senior management team, the Compensation Committee engaged Korn Ferry, an internationally-recognized compensation consulting firm, as its compensation consultant to review and advise us on our compensation practices. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Korn Ferry pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that the work of Korn Ferry has not raised any conflict of interest.

From 2020 to 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed widely-used survey data to benchmark our compensation arrangements. The Compensation Committee used broad survey data, in part, because there was a lack of direct data on publicly traded electric vehicle charging station companies as a peer group. Additionally, the Compensation Committee chose this approach as the large size of the survey reduced the dependence of the results on any one industry that could otherwise skew the survey results in any particular year.

15

Using this approach, Korn Ferry compared positions of similar scope and complexity with the data contained in the surveys. Korn Ferry then provided a salary range for each executive level. The Compensation Committee typically sets target compensation levels for executives in the 50th to 75th percentile range (except Mr. Farkas whose compensation was at a higher percentile level for reasons mentioned below) as it believes the use of this range (i) helps ensure our compensation program provides sufficient compensation to attract and retain talented executives and (ii) maintains internal pay equity, without overcompensating our employees. Each executive’s target compensation level for this purpose is based on the sum of his base salary, annual cash bonus and annual equity award but excludes one-time equity/option awards.

In 2021, Korn Ferry augmented our survey-based compensation approach by suppling the Compensation Committee with actual peer group data in order to evaluate the compensation arrangements for our named executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and directors. With respect to Korn Ferry’s assessment, the comparable group of companies consisted of the following companies, determined to: (i) focus on the same industry or adjacent industry as us, (ii) generally have similar revenues as us, (iii) generally have similar market capitalization as us, (iv) generally have similar operating income as us, and (v) generally have the same number of employees as us:

Allego N.V., Beam Global, ChargePoint Holdings, EVgo, Inc., Nuvve Holding Corp., Tritium DCFC Limited, Volta Inc. and Wallbox N.V.

It is expected that Korn Ferry’s assessment using both survey data and peer group analyses will continue to be considered in setting compensation and in renewing the terms of employment agreements with several of our executive officers.

Elements of Compensation

We evaluate individual executive performance with a goal of setting compensation at levels our Board or any applicable committee believes are comparable with executives in other companies of similar size and stage of development while taking into account our relative performance and our own strategic goals. The compensation received by our named executive officers consists of the following elements:

Base Salary

Base salaries for our executives are established based on the scope of their responsibilities and individual experience, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions within our industry.

The Compensation Committee considers compensation data from the peer companies to the extent the executive positions at these companies are considered comparable to our positions and informative of the competitive environment. Compensation data for our peer group were collected from available proxy-disclosed data. This information was gathered and analyzed for the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles (or alternatively using low, medium and high categories) for annual base salary, short-term incentive pay elements and long-term incentive pay elements.

Variable Pay

We design our variable pay programs to be both affordable and competitive in relation to the market. We monitor the market and adjust our variable pay programs as needed. Our variable pay programs, such as our bonus program, are designed to motivate employees to achieve overall goals. Our programs are designed to avoid entitlements, to align actual payouts with the actual results achieved, and to be easy to understand and administer.

Equity-Based Incentives

Salaries and bonuses are intended to compensate our executive officers for short-term performance. We also have adopted an equity incentive program intended to reward longer-term performance and to help align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. We believe that long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture that rewards performance by our named executive officers through the use of equity incentives. Our equity incentive plan has been established to provide our employees, including our named executive officers, with incentives to help align those employees’ interests with the interests of our stockholders.

16

When making equity-award decisions, the Compensation Committee considers market data, the grant size, the forms of long-term equity compensation available to it under our existing plans and the status of previously granted awards. The amount of equity incentive compensation granted reflects the executives’ expected contributions to our future success. Existing ownership levels are not a factor in award determination, as the Compensation Committee does not want to discourage executives from holding significant amounts of our stock.

Future equity awards that we make to our named executive officers will be driven by our sustained performance over time, our named executive officers’ ability to impact our results that drive stockholder value, their level of responsibility, their potential to fill roles of increasing responsibility, and competitive equity award levels for similar positions in comparable companies. Equity forms a key part of the overall compensation for each executive officer and is evaluated each year as part of the annual performance review process and incentive payout calculation.

The amounts awarded to the named executive officers are based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective determination of what is appropriate to incentivize the executives. Generally, the grants to named executive officers vest over a three-year period with 33-1/3% vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. All equity awards to our employees, including named executive officers, and to directors have been granted and reflected in our financial statements, based upon the applicable accounting guidance, with the exercise price equal to the fair market value of one share of common stock on the grant date.

In order to encourage a long-term perspective and to encourage key employees to remain with us, our stock options typically have annual vesting over a three-year period and a term of five years. Generally, vesting ends upon termination of services and exercise rights of vested options cease three months after termination of services. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.

Benefits Programs

We design our benefits programs to be both affordable and competitive in relation to the market while conforming to local laws and practices. We monitor the market and local laws and practices and adjust our benefits programs as needed. We design our benefits programs to provide an element of core benefits and, to the extent possible, offer options for additional benefits, be tax-effective for employees in any foreign country and balance costs and cost-sharing between our employees and us.

Timing of Equity Awards

Only the Compensation Committee may approve restricted stock or stock option grants to our executive officers. Shares of restricted stock and stock options are generally granted at meetings of the Compensation Committee or pursuant to a unanimous written consent of the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of a newly granted option is the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

Executive Equity Ownership

We encourage our executives to hold a significant equity interest in our company. However, we do not have specific share retention and ownership guidelines for our executives.

Consideration of Advisory Votes to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

We value the opinions of our stockholders, including as expressed through advisory votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay Votes”). In our most recent Say-On-Pay Vote, conducted at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, held on July 11, 2022, our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers on an advisory basis, with approximately 70% of the votes cast in favor of the fiscal 2021 compensation of our named executive officers. In setting fiscal 2023 compensation, we will consider the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Vote during our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and will continue to consider the outcome of future Say-on-Pay Votes, as well as stockholder feedback received throughout the year, when making compensation decisions for our executive officers.

17

Effect of Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions

In the review and establishment of our compensation programs, we consider the anticipated accounting and tax implications for our executives and us.

Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code disallows public companies a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to their chief executive officer and certain other specified officers in any taxable year. For tax years ending prior to December 31, 2017, compensation in excess of $1 million could only be deducted if it was “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code or qualified for one of the other exemptions from the deduction limit. The exemption from Section 162(m) of the Code’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered officers (which now also includes our Chief Financial Officer) in excess of $1 million will generally not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. We seek to maintain flexibility in compensating our executives in a manner designed to promote our corporate goals and, therefore, while we are mindful of the benefit of the full deductibility of compensation, our Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring that any or all compensation to be deductible. Our Compensation Committee may authorize compensation payments that are not fully tax deductible if we believe that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent or meet other business objectives.

Role of Executives in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Board and our Compensation Committee generally seek input from our Chief Executive Officer, Michael D. Farkas, and President, Brendan S. Jones, when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for, executives other than themselves. The Compensation Committee also works with Michael P. Rama, our Chief Financial Officer, to evaluate the financial, accounting, tax and retention implications of our various compensation programs. Neither Mr. Farkas nor Mr. Jones, who are directors, participate in deliberations relating to their own compensation.

Compensation Risk Management

We have considered the risk associated with our compensation policies and practices for all employees, and we believe we have designed our compensation policies and practices in a manner that does not create incentives that could lead to excessive risk taking that would have a material adverse effect on us.

We structure our compensation to consist of base salary, variable pay, equity-based pay and benefits. The base portion of compensation is designed to provide a steady income regardless of our stock price performance so that executives do not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business measures. Our variable pay and equity-based pay programs are designed to reward both short- and long-term corporate performance. For short-term performance, our variable pay programs are designed to motivate employees to achieve overall goals. For long-term performance, our stock option awards generally vest over four years and are only valuable if our stock price increases over time. We believe that these various elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage of overall compensation to motivate executives to produce superior short- and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficiently high that the executives are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.

Our bonus program has been structured around the attainment of overall corporate goals for the past several years and we have seen no evidence that it encourages unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

Summary Compensation Table

The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our principal executive officer who served as such during all of 2022 (Michael D. Farkas), our principal financial officer who served as such during all of 2022 (Michael P. Rama) and our three most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2022 (Brendan S. Jones, Aviv Hillo and Harjinder Bhade). We refer to these executive officers as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs.”

18

Summary Compensation Table

     Award Compensation 
Name and Principal Position Year  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Stock Awards(6) ($)  Option Awards(6) ($)  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)  Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)  All Other Compensation ($)  Total ($) 
Michael D. Farkas(1)  2022  $874,006  $-  $12,473,546  $-  $1,700,000  $              -  $830,260  $15,877,812 
Executive Chairman and  2021  $1,003,810  $1,281,000  $768,172  $14,431,369  $-  $-  $519,400  $18,003,751 
Chief Executive Officer  2020  $479,999  $120,000  $60,000  $180,000  $-  $-  $103,758  $943,757 
                                     
Brendan S. Jones(2)  2022  $493,011  $-  $1,184,859  $-  $310,650  $-  $64,242  $2,052,762 
President  2021  $380,750  $109,192  $24,548  $3,629,530  $-  $-  $225,368  $4,369,388 
   2020  $256,417  $55,000  $72,746  $-  $-  $-  $57,336  $441,499 
                                     
Michael P. Rama(3)  2022  $408,003  $-  $701,807  $-  $212,550  $-  $282,646  $1,605,006 
Chief Financial  2021  $327,750  $36,000  $33,493  $100,480  $-  $-  $636,962  $1,134,685 
Officer  2020  $273,144  $100,000  $110,000  $298,911  $-  $-  $22,444  $804,499 
                                     
Aviv Hillo(4)  2022  $377,167  $-  $701,807  $-  $197,790  $-  $52,206  $1,328,970 
General  2021  $327,750  $86,000  $37,500  $112,500  $-  $-  $45,189  $608,939 
Counsel  2020  $268,959  $54,000  $27,000  $81,000  $-  $-  $43,626  $474,585 
                                     
Harjinder Bhade(5)  2022  $403,602  $-  $665,116  $-  $218,000  $-  $68,304  $1,355,022 
Chief Technology  2021  $251,800  $1,000  $-  $-  $-  $-  $17,649  $270,449 
Officer  2020  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 

(1)Michael D. Farkas serves as our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed to these positions in January 2015 and October 2018 (and previously from 2010 to July 2015), respectively. On May 28, 2021, Mr. Farkas entered into a new employment agreement which included increases in cash and equity compensation, as well as one-time awards and payments in satisfaction of his 2020 bonuses of $1,280,000 (included in Bonus), restricted stock grant of 19,504 shares of common stock (included in Stock Awards), grant of 23,862 in stock options (included in Option Awards), and a salary catch-up since the expiration of his prior agreement in June 2020 of $294,575 (included in Salary). Mr. Farkas also received a special four-year performance option to purchase 475,285 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $37.40 per share, which will vest if the Company’s stock price on the Nasdaq exchange reaches and remains on average for a period of 20 consecutive market days at a closing price of $90 per share during the four-year term of the option. The performance option had a grant date fair value of $13,531,369, which was estimated using a third-party provider who utilized a Monte Carlo simulation model (included in Option Awards). Included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Farkas are (i) company-paid health insurance benefits of $19,256, $21,006 and $23,883 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, (ii) company-paid car lease and insurance expenses of $0, $0 and $40,947 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and (iii) a tax gross-up of $811,005, $498,394 and $38,928 relating to the vesting of stock awards in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 2022 tax gross-up payment was from the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit.

(2)Mr. Jones has served as our President since February 2021. In connection with Mr. Jones’ appointment as President in February 2021, our Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Jones stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $38.39 per share, the closing price of our common stock on February 25, 2021. The stock options, which were granted under the terms of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”), are exercisable in three equal annual increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. These stock options had a grant date fair value of $3,555,886 (included in Option Awards). Included in Bonus for Mr. Jones is a cash signing bonus of $55,000 in 2020 in accordance with his employment agreement. Included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Jones are (i) company-paid health insurance benefits of $33,827, $35,297 and $14,183 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, (ii) a tax gross-up of $30,416, $190,071 and $0 relating to the vesting of stock awards in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively and (iii) reimbursement of relocation expenses pursuant to his employment agreement of $43,153 in 2020. The 2022 tax gross-up payment was from the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit.
(3)Mr. Rama has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 2020. Included in Bonus for Mr. Rama is a cash signing bonus of $50,000 in 2020 in accordance with his 2020 employment agreement. Included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Rama are (i) company-paid health insurance benefits of $32,356, $35,298 and $22,444 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively and (ii) a tax gross-up of $250,290, $601,664 and $0 relating to the vesting of stock awards in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 2022 tax gross-up payment was from the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit.

(4)Mr. Hillo has served as our General Counsel since April 2018. Included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Hillo are (i) company-paid health insurance benefits of $19,256, $21,006 and $21,039 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively and (ii) a tax gross-up of $32,950, $24,183 and $22,587 relating to the vesting of stock awards in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 2022 tax gross-up payment was from the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit.
(5)Mr. Bhade has served as our Chief Technology Officer since May 2021. Included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Bhade is company-paid health insurance benefits of $32,356 and $17,649 in 2022 and 2021, respectively and (ii) a tax gross-up of $35,948, $0 and $0 relating to the vesting of stock awards in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 2022 tax gross-up payment was from the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit.
(6)Represents stock and option awards granted in 2022, 2021 and 2020 pursuant to our 2018 Plan. The aggregate grant date fair value of such awards was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not represent actual amounts paid or to be realized. Amounts shown are not necessarily indicative of values to be achieved, which may be more or less than the amounts shown as awards are subject to time-based vesting. The assumptions used in calculating these amounts are discussed in Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Original 10-K.

19

Grant of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards made by us during the year ended December 31, 2022, to each of the NEOs.

     Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards  Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards             
Name Grant Date  Threshold ($)  Target ($)  Maximum ($)  Threshold (#)  Target (#)  Maximum (#)  All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)  All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)  Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards ($/sh)  Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) 
Michael D. Farkas(1)     $            -  $1,700,000  $         -       -   -          -   -   -  $-  $- 
   03/21/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   101,750   -  $-  $2,500,000 
   07/29/22  $-  $-  $-   -   472,367   -   -   -  $-  $9,973,547 
Brendan S. Jones(1)     $-  $285,000  $-   -   -   -   -   -  $-  $- 
   03/21/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   7,631   -  $-  $187,500 
   07/29/22  $-  $-  $-   -   47,237   -   -   -  $-  $997,355 
Michael P. Rama(1)     $-  $195,000  $-   -   -   -   -   -  $-  $- 
   03/21/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   8,267   -  $-  $101,563 
   07/29/22  $-  $-  $-   -   23,618   -   -   -  $-  $498,677 
Aviv Hillo(1)     $-  $181,458  $-   -   -   -   -   -  $-  $- 
   03/21/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   8,267   -  $-  $101,563 
   05/19/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   -   37,324  $15.70  $540,000 
   07/29/22  $-  $-  $-   -   23,618   -   -   -  $-  $498,677 
Harjinder Bhade(1)     $-  $200,000  $-   -   -   -   -   -  $-   - 
   03/21/22  $-  $-  $-   -   -   -   6,774   -  $-   166,438 
   07/29/22  $-  $-  $-   -   23,618   -   -   -  $-   498,677 

(1)On July 29, 2022, Messrs. Farkas, Jones, Rama, Hillo and Bhade, who are responsible for the acquisition and integration of SemaConnect, were granted one-time performance-based restricted stock awards under our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan. A total number of 590,458 shares of common stock, with a fair value on the grant date of $12,466,933, were awarded to these executives. The agreements provide that Messrs. Farkas, Jones, Rama, Hillo and Bhade received 472,367, 47,237, 23,618, 23,618 and 23,618 shares of common stock, respectively. The awards of performance-based restricted stock are intended to provide an appropriate incentive structure for our executive management team to integrate and commercialize the SemaConnect acquisition given the transformational nature of the acquisition in a way that is aligned with stockholder interests. The awards of these performance-based restricted stock become vested based on a series of six performance hurdles that must be achieved before the third anniversary of the grants. In addition to the closing of the SemaConnect acquisition with certain cost savings as the initial 20% vesting event, the vesting of the remaining 80% of the restricted stock is generally determined based on the (i) integration of SemaConnect’s hardware and software platforms, (ii) integration of its business processes, (iii) integration of its human capital processes, (iv) delivery and execution of a product rationalization roadmap and new production ready units for UL certification, and (v) our common stock’s closing price reaching on average for a period of ten consecutive trading days a price of $23.78, which is 50% over the price paid by us to SemaConnect shareholders in the acquisition, in each case without regard to the order of achieving the foregoing hurdles. The Board has discretion to determine when each performance hurdle has been achieved and to accelerate awards pursuant to the program. As of December 31, 2022, the vesting performance hurdles related to the closing of the SemaConnect acquisition and clause (v) outlined above were met.

20

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information on outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2022 to the NEOs:

    Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Grant Date Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable  Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration Date

 Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)  

Market

Value of

Shares

or Units of Stock

That

Have

Not

Vested

($)

  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(1) ($) 
                             
Michael D. Farkas 12/13/2018     -   -   200  $2.53  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   100  $2.17  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   100  $2.50  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   15,000  $5.25  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   7,000  $30.00  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   8,240  $37.50  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   100  $6.00  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/31/2018  -   -   100  $3.52  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/13/2018  -   -   100  $2.63  12/13/23  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/16/2019  -   -   100  $3.30  04/16/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 05/14/2019  -   -   4,200  $3.06  05/14/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 06/06/2019  -   -   100  $2.55  06/06/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 08/21/2019  -   -   100  $2.99  08/21/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 10/21/2019  -   -   100  $2.61  10/21/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/17/2019  -   -   100  $2.33  12/17/24  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 03/09/2020  -   -   100  $2.51  03/09/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/29/2020  -   -   100  $1.89  04/29/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 06/17/2020  -   -   100  $2.66  06/17/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/04/2020  -   -   100  $25.59   12/04/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/07/2020  -   -   100  $26.41   12/07/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 12/11/2020  -   -   100  $31.13   12/11/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 05/28/2021  -   -   475,285  $37.40   05/28/25  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 02/10/2021  -   -   100  $59.22   02/10/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 02/12/2021  -   -   100  $56.27   02/12/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 02/23/2021  -   -   400  $42.67   02/23/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 03/29/2021  -   -   100  $38.45   03/29/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 03/31/2021  -   -   100  $45.21   03/31/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/20/2020  -   -   37,543  $2.01   04/20/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/12/2021  -   -   7,976  $44.90   04/11/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/20/2020  -   -   36,916  $2.01   04/20/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/12/2021  -   -   7,976  $44.90   04/11/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas 04/20/2020  -   -   36,372  $2.01   04/20/28  -  $-   -  $- 

21

Michael D. Farkas 04/12/2021  -   -   7,976  $44.90   04/11/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael D. Farkas(2) 03/21/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   50,875  $558,099 
Michael D. Farkas(3) 07/29/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   330,657  $3,627,303 
Brendan S. Jones 02/25/2021  -   -   33,333  $38.39   02/25/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones 04/12/2021  -   -   648  $40.82   04/11/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones 02/25/2021  -   -   33,333  $38.39   02/25/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones 04/12/2021  -   -   648  $40.82   04/11/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones 02/25/2021  -   -   33,334  $38.39   02/25/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones 04/12/2021  -   -   648  $40.82   04/11/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Brendan S. Jones(2) 03/21/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   5,723  $62,781 
Brendan S. Jones(3) 07/29/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   33,066  $362,730 
Michael P. Rama 06/05/2020  -   -   50,000  $2.20   02/07/26  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama 06/05/2020  -   -   50,000  $2.20   02/07/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama 04/12/2021  -   -   885  $40.82   04/11/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama 06/05/2020  -   -   50,000  $2.20   02/07/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama 04/12/2021  -   -   885  $40.82   04/11/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama 04/12/2021  -   -   884  $40.82   04/11/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Michael P. Rama(4) 06/05/2020  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   16,666  $182,826 
Michael P. Rama(2) 03/21/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   6,200  $68,014 
Michael P. Rama(3) 07/29/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   16,533  $181,365 
Aviv Hillo 03/31/2019  -   -   3,879  $3.13   03/31/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 04/12/2021  -   -   990  $40.82   04/11/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 04/20/2020  -   -   16,517  $1.83   04/20/27  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 04/12/2021  -   -   991  $40.82   04/11/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 04/20/2020  -   -   16,286  $1.83   04/20/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 04/12/2021  -   -   991  $40.82   04/11/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 05/17/2022  -   -   12,441  $15.70   05/17/28  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 05/17/2022  -   -   12,441  $15.70   05/17/29  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo 05/17/2022  -   -   12,441  $15.70   05/17/30  -  $-   -  $- 
Aviv Hillo(2) 03/21/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   6,200  $68,014 
Aviv Hillo(3) 07/29/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   16,533  $181,365 
Harjinder Bhade(2) 03/21/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   5,081  $55,739 
Harjinder Bhade(3) 07/29/2022  -   -   -  $-  -  -  $-   16,533  $181,365 

(1)Calculated by multiplying the number of shares of common stock by $10.97, which is the quoted market price per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2022.
(2)These shares vest in three annual increments on March 21, 2023, 2024 and 2025, subject to immediate vesting upon an event constituting a change of control of the Company.
(3)These shares vest in various increments based on the achievement of certain performance conditions related to the integration of the SemaConnect acquisition during 2022.
(4)These shares vest on February 7, 2023, subject to immediate vesting upon an event constituting a change of control of the Company.

22

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2022

The following table sets forth information concerning the option exercises and stock awards vested of each of the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2022:

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Exercise

  

Value

Realized on

Exercise

  

Number of

Shares

Acquired On

Vesting

  

Value

Realized on

Vesting

 
Name (#)  ($)  (#)  ($) 
Michael D. Farkas    -  $      -   192,585  $4,192,844 
Brendan S. Jones  -  $-   16,079  $341,159 
Michael P. Rama  -  $-   18,734  $381,788 
Aviv Hillo  -  $-   9,152  $197,923 
Harjinder Bhade  -  $-   8,779  $188,752 

Pension Benefits

The Company has not adopted a pension plan and does not provide pension benefits to NEOs.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

The Company has not adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and does not provide non-qualified deferred compensation to NEOs.

Employment and Management Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements

Michael D. Farkas Employment Agreement

On May 28, 2021, we entered into a new employment agreement with Michael D. Farkas, our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Farkas will continue to serve as our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The term of the employment agreement is January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. Mr. Farkas will continue to devote his full-time business efforts, attention, energy and skill to the performance of his employment towards furthering the interests of our company and its affiliates.

Under the employment agreement, Mr. Farkas received a base salary of $800,000 and $850,000 for 2021 and 2022, respectively, and will receive a base salary of $900,000 for 2023. Mr. Farkas is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus (payable in cash and securities), with a target bonus of 100% of his base salary, with Mr. Farkas eligible to receive up to 200% of his base salary based on the achievement of key performance indicators established by the Board and Mr. Farkas. Mr. Farkas is eligible to receive equity awards (one-half in restricted stock and one-half in stock options) with a target aggregate value of $1,000,000, with the actual amount determined by the achievement of the key performance indicators during each year of the employment term. Mr. Farkas also received a special performance option exercisable into 475,285 shares, which will vest if our stock price on the Nasdaq exchange reaches and remains on average for a period of 20 consecutive market days at a closing price of $90 per share during the four-year term of the option. Additionally, Mr. Farkas received one-time awards and payments in satisfaction of his 2020 bonuses, equity awards, and a salary catch-up since the expiration of his prior agreement in June 2020.

The employment agreement provides that, if Mr. Farkas is terminated without cause, resigns for good reason, dies or becomes disabled during the term of employment, he will receive his base salary for the remainder of the employment term and payment of 2.6 times his target performance bonus/equity awards and base salary. In the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason within nine months prior to or 18 months following a change in control, the multiple in the previous sentence will be 3.5 times.

The employment agreement also contains covenants (a) restricting Mr. Farkas from engaging in any activities competitive with our business during the term of employment and one year thereafter, (b) prohibiting Mr. Farkas from disclosure of confidential information regarding our company at any time, and (c) confirming that all intellectual property developed by Mr. Farkas which specifically relates to the EV charging business constitutes our sole and exclusive property.

The employment agreement provides that a commission sales agreement entered into on November 17, 2009 between an entity controlled by Mr. Farkas and a predecessor of our company will remain suspended and no payments will be due thereunder for as long as Mr. Farkas is a full-time employee of our company and is paid a monthly salary of at least $30,000. Finally, we and Mr. Farkas agreed to resolve a dispute over Mr. Farkas’ transfer of 260,000 shares of our common stock to a prior institutional investor through a settlement agreement and payment of $1,000,000 to Mr. Farkas by us.

23

Brendan S. Jones Employment Agreement

On December 27, 2021, we entered into a new employment agreement with Brendan S. Jones, our President, superseding his prior employment offer letter, dated as of March 29, 2020. The term of his new employment agreement starts on January 1, 2022 and extends until March 31, 2025. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Jones agreed to devote his full business efforts and time to our company. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Jones will receive an annual base salary of $475,000, payable on our regular scheduled payday. Mr. Jones will be eligible for an annual performance cash bonus of up to 60% of his annual base salary based on meeting pre-determined periodic key performance indicators every year set by the mutual agreement of our Board’s Compensation Committee and Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones will also be eligible to receive aggregate annual equity awards under our incentive compensation plan equal to 50% of his annual base salary. Such awards will be split in equal amounts in the form of restricted common stock and stock options. The restricted common stock will vest on the first anniversary of its grant date and the stock options will vest in equal one-third increments on each anniversary of the grant date, in each instance subject to satisfying key performance indicators and other performance criteria and his continued employment with us on the applicable vesting date. Mr. Jones is entitled to a monthly electric vehicle and auto insurance allowance of up to $1,500 per month, and other employee benefits in accordance with our policies.

If Mr. Jones’ employment is terminated by us other than for Cause (which includes willful material misconduct and willful failure to materially perform his responsibilities to our company), he is entitled to receive severance equal to the number of months of his actual employment under the new employment agreement prior to the termination capped at a maximum payment of 12 months of his base salary.

If we undergo a “change in control” (which generally means a merger or acquisition of our company as a result of which the acquirer obtains more than 50% of our total voting power), Mr. Jones will receive a severance payment equal to 2.99 times his annual base salary if (i) he loses his position as our President (excluding elevation to a more senior position), (ii) his position is diminished via a restructuring, (iii) his title is changed to a lesser role, (iv) his responsibility is significantly reduced, (v) his compensation is materially decreased, or (vi) he is terminated without Cause during the merger/acquisition process or within one year after the closing of the transaction. Additionally, all restricted common stock and stock options held by Mr. Jones will immediately vest upon a change in control.

As part of his new employment agreement, Mr. Jones entered into our standard Employee Confidentiality and Assignment of Inventions Agreement prohibiting Mr. Jones from disclosure of confidential and/or proprietary information relating to the operations, products and services of our company and our clients and acknowledging that all intellectual property developed by Mr. Jones relating to our business constitutes our exclusive property. Mr. Jones further agreed that during his employment with our company he will not engage in, or have any direct or indirect interest in, any person, firm, corporation or business (whether as an employee, officer, director, agent, security holder, creditor, consultant, partner or otherwise) that is competitive with the business of our company, including, without limitation, planning, developing, installing, marketing, selling, leasing and providing services relating to electric vehicle charging stations.

Michael P. Rama Employment Agreement

On May 19, 2022, we entered into a new employment agreement with Michael P. Rama, our Chief Financial Officer, renewing his prior employment offer letter, dated as of February 7, 2020. The term of his new employment agreement started on January 1, 2022 and extends until March 31, 2025. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Rama agreed to devote his full business efforts and time to our company. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Rama will receive an initial annual base salary of $390,000, payable on our regular scheduled payday. Mr. Rama will be eligible for an annual performance cash bonus of up to 50% of his annual base salary based on meeting pre-determined periodic key performance indicators every year set by the mutual agreement of our Board’s Compensation Committee and Mr. Rama. Mr. Rama will also be eligible to receive aggregate annual equity awards under our incentive compensation plan equal to 50% of his annual base salary. Such awards will be comprised of restricted common stock. 50% of the restricted common stock granted will vest immediately on the grant date, and the remaining 50% will vest in equal one-third increments on each anniversary of the grant date, in each instance subject to satisfying key performance indicators and other performance criteria and his continued employment with us on the applicable vesting date. Mr. Rama is entitled to a monthly electric vehicle and auto insurance allowance of up to $1,500 per month, and other employee benefits in accordance with our policies.

If Mr. Rama’s employment is terminated by us other than for Cause (which includes willful material misconduct and willful failure to materially perform his responsibilities to our company), he is entitled to receive severance equal to the number of months of his actual employment under the new employment agreement prior to the termination capped at a maximum payment of 12 months of his base salary.

If we undergo a “change in control” (which generally means a merger or acquisition of our company as a result of which the acquirer obtains more than 50% of our total voting power), Mr. Rama will receive a severance payment equal to 2.99 times his annual base salary if (i) he loses his position as our Chief Financial Officer (excluding elevation to a more senior position), (ii) his title is changed to a lesser role, (iii) his compensation is materially decreased, or (iv) he is terminated without Cause during the merger/acquisition process or within one year after the closing of such transaction. Additionally, all restricted common stock and stock options held by Mr. Rama will immediately vest upon a change in control.

24

Aviv Hillo Employment Agreement

On May 19, 2022, we entered into a new employment agreement with Aviv Hillo, our General Counsel, renewing his prior employment offer letter, dated as of June 18, 2018, which had been renewed on September 25, 2020. The term of his new employment agreement started on June 1, 2022 and extends until May 31, 2025. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Hillo agreed to devote his full business efforts and time to our company. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Hillo will receive an initial annual base salary of $390,000, payable on our regular scheduled payday. Mr. Hillo will be eligible for an annual performance cash bonus of up to 50% of his annual base salary based on meeting pre-determined periodic key performance indicators every year set by the mutual agreement of our Board’s Compensation Committee and Mr. Hillo. Mr. Hillo will also be eligible to receive aggregate annual equity awards under our incentive compensation plan equal to 50% of his annual base salary. Such awards will be comprised of restricted common stock. 50% of the restricted common stock granted will vest immediately on the grant date, and the remaining 50% will vest in equal one-third increments on each anniversary of the grant date, in each instance subject to satisfying key performance indicators and other performance criteria and his continued employment with us on the applicable vesting date. As a signing bonus, Mr. Hillo received stock options to purchase 37,324 shares of common stock at $15.70 per share, which will vest in equal one-third increments on each anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Hillo is entitled to a monthly electric vehicle and auto insurance allowance of up to $1,500 per month, and other employee benefits in accordance with our policies.

If Mr. Hillo’s employment is terminated by us other than for Cause (which includes willful material misconduct and willful failure to materially perform his responsibilities to our company), he is entitled to receive severance equal to the number of months of his actual employment under the new employment agreement prior to the termination capped at a maximum payment of 12 months of his base salary.

If we undergo a “change in control” (which generally means a merger or acquisition of our company as a result of which the acquirer obtains more than 50% of our total voting power), Mr. Hillo will receive a severance payment equal to 2.99 times his annual base salary if (i) he loses his position as our General Counsel (excluding elevation to a more senior position), (ii) his title is changed to a lesser role, (iii) his compensation is materially decreased, or (iv) he is terminated without Cause during the merger/acquisition process or within one year after the closing of the transaction. Additionally, all restricted common stock and stock options held by Mr. Hillo will immediately vest upon a change in control.

Harjinder Bhade Employment Agreement

On April 20, 2021, we entered into an employment offer letter with Harjinder Bhade to serve as our Chief Technology Officer. The term of his employment letter extends until May 3, 2023 and is automatically renewable for an additional one-year period. Pursuant to the employment letter, Mr. Bhade agreed to devote his full business efforts and time to our company. The employment letter provides that Mr. Bhade will receive an annual base salary of $400,000, payable on our regular scheduled payday. Mr. Bhade will be eligible for an annual performance bonus of up to 50% of his annual base salary based on meeting pre-established periodic key performance indicators every year set by the mutual agreement of our Board’s Compensation Committee and Mr. Bhade. Mr. Bhade will also be eligible to receive aggregate annual equity awards under our incentive compensation plan equal to 50% of his annual base salary. Such awards will be allocated in 25% and 75% amounts in the form of restricted common stock and stock options, respectively. The restricted common stock will vest on the first anniversary of its grant date (with a cash payment upon vesting to cover expected ordinary income tax charges) and the stock options will vest in equal one-third increments on each anniversary of the grant date, in each instance subject to satisfying key performance indicators and other performance criteria and his continued employment with us on the applicable vesting date.

Mr. Bhade will also be eligible for additional awards during the first two years of his employment valued at up to $5.5 million, payable through a stock issuance, option grant or in cash, upon substantial completion and achievement of individual key performance indicators that include network development, new products, energy storage and other technology solutions. All of the above bonus and equity grants are subject to our “clawback” policy. Mr. Bhade is entitled to a monthly electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle allowance of up to $300 per month, and other employee benefits in accordance with our policies.

25

If Mr. Bhade’s employment is terminated by us other than for Cause (which includes willful material misconduct, willful failure to materially perform his job duties to our company and material violation of our company’s code of conduct and policies), he is entitled to receive severance equal to the number of months of his actual employment under the new employment agreement prior to the termination capped at a maximum payment of 12 months of his base salary and accelerated vesting of his annual equity award for up to 12 months. If there is a buy-out or a “change of control,” Mr. Bhade will also be entitled to obtain his base salary for a period of 12 months as a severance payment and, if Mr. Bhade is terminated without Cause, the balance of the additional $5.5 million in awards, any unvested equity awards and his annual performance bonus will immediately vest and be paid upon execution of a release and waiver agreement with the company.

As part of his employment letter, Mr. Bhade entered into our standard Employee Confidentiality and Assignment of Inventions Agreement prohibiting Mr. Bhade from disclosure of confidential and/or proprietary information relating to the operations, products and services of our company and our clients and acknowledging that all intellectual property developed by Mr. Bhade relating to our business constitutes our exclusive property. Mr. Bhade further agreed that during his employment with our company he will not engage in, or have any direct or indirect interest in, any person, firm, corporation or business (whether as an employee, officer, director, agent, security holder, creditor, consultant, partner or otherwise) that is competitive with the business of our company, including, without limitation, planning, developing, installing, marketing, selling, leasing and providing services relating to electric vehicle charging stations.

Compensation of Directors

The following table provides information for 2022 regarding all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who served as a director for all or some portion of 2022:

Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)  Stock Awards(1) ($)  Option
Awards
($)
  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation ($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

  

All Other

Compensation(2)

  Total 
Louis R. Buffalino $94,417  $ 150,000  $     -  $          -          -  $19,078  $263,495 
                             
Jack Levine $130,667  $180,000  $-  $-   -  $24,808  $335,475 
                             
Kenneth R. Marks $91,169  $150,000  $-  $-   -  $19,078  $260,247 
                             
Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans $96,083  $150,000  $-  $-   -  $35,191  $281,274 
                             
Carmen M. Perez-Carlton $48,566  $-  $-  $-   -  $2,607  $51,173 
                             
Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy(3) $-  $-  $-  $-   -  $210,514  $210,514 
                             
Cedric L. Richmond $29,796  $-  $-  $-   -  $-  $29,796 
                             
Total $490,698  $630,000  $-  $-  $-  $311,276  $1,431,974 

(1)Mr. Levine was awarded 10,645 shares of restricted stock and Messrs. Buffalino, Marks and van Montfrans were each awarded 8,870 shares of restricted stock. These awards were granted on July 11, 2022 pursuant to the 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan with respect to service as a director during the 2023 fiscal year. The shares vest on the earlier of (a) July 11, 2023 or (b) the date preceding the next annual meeting of the stockholders of our company.

26
46

 

 

(2)Reflects gross-up tax payments related to the vesting of stock awards that were granted prior to the termination of such benefit as a result of the vesting on July 11, 2022 of the annual award to our non-employee directors granted on September 2, 2021 for Messrs. Buffalino, Levine, Marks, van Montfrans and Ms. Perez-Carlton.

BLINK CHARGING CO.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 688)F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021F-5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021F-6
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2023F-7
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2022F-8
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2021F-9
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021F-10
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-12

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Blink Charging Co.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blink Charging Co. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 18, 2024 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of the existence of material weaknesses.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-2

Business Combination

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company acquired Envoy Technologies, Inc. in April 2023. This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We identified the evaluation of the acquisition-date fair value of the intangible assets acquired as a critical audit matter.

The principal consideration for our determination that the evaluation of the acquisition-date fair values of the intangible assets acquired was a critical audit matter is the high degree of subjective auditor judgment associated with evaluating management’s determination of the fair values of the acquired intangible assets, which is primarily due to the complexity of the valuation models used and the sensitivity of the underlying significant assumptions. The key assumptions used within the valuation models included prospective financial information such as future revenue growth and an applied discount rate. The calculated fair values are sensitive to changes in these key assumptions.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of acquisition-date fair values of intangible assets acquired included the following, among others:

We evaluated the design effectiveness of certain controls over the acquisition-date valuation process, including controls over the development of the key assumptions such as the future revenue growth and the applied discount rate.
We obtained the purchase price allocation analysis from management and the third-party specialist engaged by management.

We assessed the qualifications and competence of management and the third-party specialist; and
We evaluated the methodologies used to determine the fair values of the intangible assets.

We tested the assumptions used within the discounted cash flow models to estimate the fair values of the intangible assets, which included key assumptions such as the future revenue growth and the applied discount rate.
We assessed the reasonableness of management’s forecast by inquiring with management to understand how the forecast was developed and comparing the projections to historical results and external sources, including industry trends and peer companies’ historical data.
We involved our internal valuation specialist who assisted in the evaluation and testing performed on the reasonableness of significant assumptions to the models, including the applied discount rate.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Impairment

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Notes 5 and 6 to the financial statements, the Company recognized goodwill and other intangible assets impairment charges of approximately $89.1 million and $5.1 million, respectively, in the statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2023. We identified management’s impairment analysis as a critical audit matter.

The principal consideration for our determination that the evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets impairment was a critical audit matter is the high degree of subjective auditor judgment associated with evaluating management’s determination of the fair values of each reporting unit and the discounted cash flow model used in management’s assessment. This led to a high degree of auditor judgement, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures in this audit area.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of reporting date fair values of goodwill and other intangible assets included the following, among others:

We tested management’s process for determining the fair value estimate of each reporting unit.
We evaluated the discounted cash flow model used in management’s assessment.
We tested the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of the underlying data used by management in the discounted cash flow model.
We evaluated the reasonableness of significant assumptions used by management as part of their analysis.
We involved our internal valuation specialist who assisted in the evaluation and testing performed of the goodwill and other intangible assets impairment analysis.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

New York, NY

March 18, 2024

F-3

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except for share amounts)

       
  December 31, 
  2023  2022 
       
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $121,691  $36,562 
Accounts receivable, net  45,447   23,581 
Inventory, net  47,942   34,740 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  6,654   4,399 
         
Total Current Assets  221,734   99,282 
Restricted cash  79   71 
Property and equipment, net  35,127   25,862 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  9,731   4,174 
Intangible assets, net  16,298   26,582 
Goodwill  144,881   203,710 
Other assets  669   2,861 
         
Total Assets $428,519  $362,542 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable $31,193  $24,585 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  14,143   13,109 
Notes payable  6,792   10 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  3,448   1,738 
Current portion of financing lease liabilities  512   306 
Current portion of deferred revenue  13,613   10,572 
         
Total Current Liabilities  69,701   50,320 
Contingent consideration  -   1,316 
Consideration payable  49,434   40,608 
Operating lease liabilities, non-current portion  7,025   3,030 
Financing lease liabilities, non-current portion  163   408 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion  12,462   5,258 
Other liabilities  337   645 
         
Total Liabilities  139,122   101,585 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)  -     
         
Stockholders’ Equity:        
         
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 92,818,233 and 51,476,445 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  93   51 
Additional paid-in capital  829,563   597,982 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (2,536)  (3,046)
Accumulated deficit  (537,723)  (334,030)
         
Total Stockholders’ Equity  289,397   260,957 
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $

428,519

  $362,542 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

  2023  2022  2021 
  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
          
Revenues:            
Product sales $109,416  $46,018  $15,480 
Charging service revenue - company-owned charging stations  15,646   6,866   2,978 
Network fees  7,481   4,370   667 
Warranty  3,258   928   220 
Grant and fees rebate  469   296   400 
Car-sharing services  3,302   1,268   769 
Other  1,026   1,393   426 
             
Total Revenues  140,598   61,139   20,940 
             
Cost of Revenues:            
Cost of product sales  72,532   31,428   11,670 
Cost of charging services - company-owned charging stations  3,540   1,466   707 
Host provider fees  9,140   3,935   1,386 
Network costs  1,969   1,463   454 
Warranty and repairs and maintenance  4,605   2,795   892 
Car-sharing services  4,356   2,137   1,458 
Depreciation and amortization  4,250   3,113   1,531 
             
Total Cost of Revenues  100,392   46,337   18,098 
             
Gross Profit  40,206   14,802   2,842 
             
Operating Expenses:            
Compensation  92,669   60,602   38,389 
General and administrative expenses  35,170   27,826   10,516 
Other operating expenses  17,825   15,645   9,606 
Impairment of goodwill  89,087   -   - 
Impairment of intangible assets  5,143   -   - 
             
Total Operating Expenses  239,894   104,073   58,511 
             
Loss From Operations  (199,688)  (89,271)  (55,669)
             
Other (Expense) Income:            
Interest (expense) income  (3,546)  (1,529)  9 
Dividend income  1,909   454   294 
Gain (loss) on foreign exchange  140   (600)  (124)
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan  -   -   856 
Loss on extinguishment of notes payable  (1,000)  -   - 
Change in fair value of derivative and other accrued liabilities  8   66   69 
Other expense  (22)  (372)  (554)
             
Total Other (Expense) Income  (2,511)  (1,981)  550 
             
Loss Before Income Taxes $(202,199) $(91,252) $(55,119)
             
Provision for income taxes  (1,494)  (308)  - 
             
Net Loss $(203,693) $(91,560) $(55,119)
Net Loss Per Share:            
Basic $(3.21) $(1.95) $(1.32)
Diluted $(3.21) $(1.95) $(1.32)
             
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:            
Basic  63,466,398   46,922,434   41,905,340 
Diluted  63,466,398   46,922,434   41,905,340 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands)

  2023  2022  2021 
  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
          
Net Loss $(203,693) $(91,560) $(55,119)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):            
Reclassification adjustments of gain on sale of marketable securities included in net loss  -   -   438 
Cumulative translation adjustments  510   (1,262)  (1,784)
             
Total Comprehensive Loss $(203,183) $(92,822) $(56,465)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023

(in thousands, except for share amounts)

  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Equity 
  Common Stock  

Additional

Paid-In

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  Accumulated  

Total

Stockholders’

 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Equity 
                   
Balance - January 1, 2023  51,476,445  $      51  $597,982  $           (3,046) $(334,030) $260,957 
                         
Common stock issued in public offering, net of issuance costs [1]  39,248,028   41   208,825   -   -   208,866 
                         
Common stock issued upon exercises of warrants  557,733   1   834   -   -   835 
                         
Stock-based compensation  632,962   -   18,484   -   -   18,484 
                         
Surrender and cancellation of common stock  (27,681)  -   (197)  -   -   (197)
                         
Reclassification of common stock liability to equity  8,235   -   35   -   -   35 
                         
Common stock issued in connection with extinguishment of notes payable  158,372   -   1,000   -   -   1,000 
                         
Common stock issued upon cashless exercise of options and warrants  393,240   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Common stock issued in satisfaction of accrued issuable equity  370,899   -   2,600   -   -   2,600 
                         
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   510   -   510 
                         
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (203,693)  (203,693)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2023  92,818,233  $93  $829,563  $(2,536) $(537,723) $289,397 

[1]Includes gross proceeds of $216,662, less issuance costs of $7,796.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022

(in thousands, except for share amounts)

  Common Stock  

Additional

Paid-In

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  Accumulated  

Total

Stockholders’

 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Equity 
                   
Balance - January 1, 2022  42,423,514  $       42  $458,046  $      (1,784) $(242,470) $213,834 
                         
Common stock issued in public offering, net of issuance costs [1]  558,721   -   7,386   -   -   7,386 
                         
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of SemaConnect  7,454,975   7   113,830   -   -   113,837 
                         
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of Electric Blue  152,803   -   2,852   -   -   2,852 
                         
Common stock issued upon exercises of warrants  73,336   -   210   -   -   210 
                         
Common stock issued upon cashless exercise of warrants  8,093   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Common stock issued upon exercise of options  5,955   -   10   -   -   10 
                         
Stock-based compensation  799,048   2   15,648   -   -   15,650 
                         
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   (1,262)  -   (1,262)
                         
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (91,560)  (91,560)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2022  51,476,445  $51  $597,982  $(3,046) $(334,030) $260,957 

[1]Includes gross proceeds of $7,697, less issuance costs of $311.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021

(in thousands except for share amounts)

  Common Stock  

Additional

Paid-In

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  Accumulated  

Total

Stockholders’

 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Equity 
                   
Balance - January 1, 2021  35,951,097  $         36  $214,479  $      -  $(187,351) $27,164 
Balance  35,951,097  $         36  $214,479  $      -  $(187,351) $27,164 
                         
Common stock issued in public offering, net of issuance costs [1]  5,660,000   6   221,327   -   -   221,333 
                         
Common stock issued upon exercises of options and warrants  534,575   -   2,000   -   -   2,000 
                         
Common stock issued upon cashless exercises of options and warrants  104,496   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Common stock issued as consideration for property and equipment  13,123   -   600   -   -   600 
                         
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of Blue Corner  32,382   -   790   -   -   790 
                         
Stock-based compensation  127,841   -   18,850   -   -   18,850 
                         
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   (1,784)  -   (1,784)
                         
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (55,119)  (55,119)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2021  42,423,514  $42  $458,046  $(1,784) $(242,470) $213,834 
Balance  42,423,514  $42  $458,046  $(1,784) $(242,470) $213,834 

[1]Includes gross proceeds of $232,060, less issuance costs of $10,727.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

  2023  2022  2021 
  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:            
Net loss $(203,693) $(91,560) $(55,119)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  12,441   9,547   2,731 
Non-cash lease expense  2,128   997   1,246 
Dividend income  -   -   (62)
Impairment of goodwill  89,087   -   - 
Impairment of intangible assets  5,143   -   - 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (1,375)  (1,499)  - 
Change in fair value of derivative and other accrued liabilities  8   -   69 
Provision for bad debt  2,555   1,336   908 
Loss on extinguishment of notes payable  1,000   -   - 
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets  (11)  113   156 
Provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory  527  78   (187)
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan  -   -   (856)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable, net  24   -   - 
Stock-based compensation:            
Common stock  12,893   11,224   4,391 
Options  4,064   4,689   14,717 
Warrants  5,082   -   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable and other receivables  (23,677)  (11,869)  (5,212)
Inventory  (15,362)  (24,283)  (9,227)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (2,134)  (1,782)  710 
Other assets  941   2   262 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities  6,977   16,309   3,723 
Other liabilities  (307)  18   103 
Operating lease liabilities  (3,672)  (825)  (1,021)
Deferred revenue  9,791   5,140   2,098 
             
Total Adjustments  106,123   9,195   14,549 
             
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities  (97,570)  (82,365)  (40,570)
             
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:            
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  -   -   6,804 
Note receivable  -   (2,200)  - 
Purchase consideration of SemaConnect, net of cash acquired  -   (38,338)  - 
Purchase consideration of Envoy, net of cash acquired  (4,660)  -   - 
Purchase of marketable securities  -   -   (7,209)
Capitalization of engineering costs  (1,028)  (294)  (237)
Purchase consideration of Blue Corner, net of cash acquired  -   -   (22,742)
Purchase consideration of Electric Blue, net of cash acquired  -   (11,360)  - 
Purchases of property and equipment  (7,552)  (5,249)  (7,065)
             
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (13,240)  (57,441)  (30,449)
             
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:            
Proceeds from sale of common stock in public offering [1]  208,865   7,386   221,333 
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  835   220   2,000 
Repayment of financing liability in connection with finance lease  (2,837)  (217)  - 
Repayment of notes payable  (9,292)  (681)  - 
Payment of financing liability in connection with internal use software  (256)  (315)  (62)
             
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities  197,315   6,393   223,271 
             
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents  (1,368)  (4,830)  206 
             
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash  85,137   (138,243)  152,458 
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - Beginning of Year  36,633   174,876   22,418 
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - End of Year $121,770  $36,633  $174,876 
             
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consisted of the following:            
Cash and cash equivalents $121,691  $36,562  $174,795 
Restricted cash  79   71   81 
Total Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $121,770  $36,633  $174,876 

[1]For the year ended December 31, 2023, includes gross proceeds of $216,662, less issuance costs of $7,796.
 
(3)Mr. Reddy was elected to our Board on July 29, 2022. The compensation reported for Mr. Reddy in this table is for compensation he received as an employee. Employee members of the Board are not paid separate compensation for serving on the Board.

Agreements Regarding Board Service

In June 2022, the Board approved a Board compensation plan (the “2022 Board Plan”), superseding the prior compensation structure adopted by the Board in December 2017. The 2022 Board Plan only applies to the non-employee members of the Board. The employee members of the Board are not paid separate compensation for serving on the Board. The 2022 Board Plan superseded all prior compensation arrangements with the Board members.

Pursuant to the 2022 Board Plan, each non-employee member of the Board receives an annual cash retainer of $80,000. The lead independent director of the Board (currently, Mr. Levine) receives a supplemental annual cash retainer in the amount of $30,000. Each non-employee member of the Board that serves in a chairperson role or as a member of a committee receives a supplemental annual cash retainer in an amount equal to the corresponding role: (i) Chair of the Audit Committee - $15,000; Member of the Audit Committee - $7,500; (ii) Chair of the Compensation Committee - $15,000; Member of the Compensation Committee - $5,000; (iii) Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee - $10,000; Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee - $5,000; and (iv) Chair of the ESG Committee - $10,000; Member of the ESG Committee - $5,000. The annual and supplemental cash retainers are payable quarterly during the last month of each quarter. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and company meetings or events.

In addition, each non-employee director will receive an annual award for the number of shares of our common stock that have a market value of $150,000 based on the closing price of the common stock on the last business day preceding the grant date. The lead independent director will receive an additional annual award for the number of shares of our common stock that have a market value of $30,000. Equity-based compensation will be granted on or about March 31 of each year, based on the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. We believe that equity compensation helps to further align the interests of our directors with those of our stockholders because the value of directors’ share ownership will rise and fall with that of our other stockholders. No equity awards will include any form of “gross-up payment” to cover taxes. Additionally, there is a limit on the number of shares of common stock granted to each non-employee director such that the fair market value of equity-based awards and the amount of any cash-based awards granted to a non-employee director during any calendar year will not exceed $200,000.

In connection with the 2022 Board Plan, the Board implemented the following procedures for future issuances of stock awards: (i) stock awards are formally approved through a Board or committee resolution; (ii) the terms of each stock award in an award agreement are executed contemporaneously with the grant; (iii) stock awards to non-employee directors are counted towards the $200,000 maximum stated above and measured by the fair market value of those awards as of the grant date set forth in the award agreement; and (iv) an individual has been appointed to ensure the shares of stock are promptly issued pursuant to the award agreement.

Retirement and Savings Plan – 401(k)

We maintain a tax qualified retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that provides eligible employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees may participate in the 401(k) Plan on the entry date coincident with or following the date they meet the 401(k) Plan’s age and service eligibility requirements. The entry date is either January 1 or July 1. In order to meet the age and service eligibility requirements, otherwise eligible employees must be age 21 or older and complete three consecutive months of employment. Participants are able to defer up to 100% of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual Code limits. All participants’ interest in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed. Currently, the 401(k) Plan does not provide for any matching contributions on employee deferrals.

27

Incentive Compensation Plans

In July 2018, our Board adopted the 2018 Plan. The holders of a majority of our shares of common stock approved the 2018 Plan at our stockholders meeting held on September 7, 2018. The 2018 Plan enables us to grant stock options, restricted stock, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance share awards, and other incentive awards to employees, directors, consultants and advisors, and to improve our ability to attract, retain and motivate individuals upon whom our sustained growth and financial success depend, by providing such persons with an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in us. Stock options granted under the 2018 Plan may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Code, except that stock options granted to outside directors and any consultants or advisers providing services to us or an affiliate shall in all cases be non-qualified stock options. The option price must be at least 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant and if, issued to a 10% or greater stockholder, must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of the grant.

The 2018 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which has discretion over the awards and grants thereunder. The aggregate maximum number of shares of common stock for which stock options or awards may be granted pursuant to the 2018 Plan is 5,000,000, as adjusted. No awards may be issued on or after September 7, 2028.

As of December 31, 2022, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,060,535 shares of common stock and 2,230,755 restricted shares of our common stock were outstanding and issued to employees and members of the Board under the 2018 Plan.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company is providing the following information about the relationship between the annual total compensation of the Company’s employees and the annual total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The CEO pay ratio figures below are a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

On December 31, 2022, we had 620 employees (full-time and part-time).

We determined the total annual compensation for our employees for the year ended December 31, 2022 using data from our payroll records for the month of December 2022, which we then extrapolated for the full year of 2022. The components of total annual compensation for our employees are the same as those used to determine the total compensation of our NEOs for the purposes of the Summary Compensation Table. We did not make any full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees. The results were then ranked, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, from lowest to highest, and the median employee was identified. We then compared the total annual compensation of the median employee to that of the Chief Executive Officer. The total annual compensation of the median employee for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $56,252. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the ratioincludes gross proceeds of our Chief Executive Officer’s total annual compensation to that$7,697, less issuance costs of our median employee was approximately 282:1, which includes the performance-based stock award which had a grant date fair value of $9,973,547. Excluding this performance option, the ratio was approximately 105:1.$311

.

 

The SEC rules for identifyingFor the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s total annual compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. No member2021, includes gross proceeds of the Compensation Committee was a member$232,060, less issuance costs of the compensation committee of another entity during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. None of our executive officers was a director or a member of the compensation committee of another entity during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. There were no transactions between any member of the Compensation Committee and the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.$10,727

28

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our shares of common stock beneficially owned as of April 28, 2023, for (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each NEO and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. A person is considered to beneficially own any shares: (i) over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or (ii) of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days after such date upon the exercise of stock options, warrants or convertible securities. Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating to the shares shown in the table for our directors and executive officers is exercised solely by the beneficial owner or shared by the owner and the owner’s spouse or children.

For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after April 28, 2023. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of common stock held by each person or group of persons, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after April 28, 2023 is deemed to be outstanding but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) 

Shares of

Common

Stock

Beneficially

Owned

  

Percentage of

Common

Stock

Outstanding(2)

 
       
Michael D. Farkas  7,962,005(3)  13.0%
         
Brendan S. Jones  157,773(4)  * 
         
Michael P. Rama  258,452(5)  * 
         
Aviv Hillo  178,202(6)  * 
         
Harjinder Bhade  53,622   * 
         
Mahidhar (Mahi) Reddy  1,058,107(7)  1.7% 
         
Louis R. Buffalino  35,579   * 
         
Jack Levine  131,641   * 
         
Kenneth R. Marks  47,269   * 
         
Ritsaart J.M. van Montfrans  35,579   * 
         
Cedric L. Richmond  5,866   * 
         
All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)  10,102,625(8)  16.5%

* Less than 1% of the outstanding shares.

(1) Each person maintains a mailing address at c/o Blink Charging Co., 605 Lincoln Road, 5th Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139.

(2) Applicable percentage ownership is based on 61,170,166 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 28, 2023.

29

(3) Represents (i) 2,475,931 shares of common stock owned directly, (ii) 4,072,616 shares of common stock held by Farkas Group Inc., of which Mr. Farkas is the President and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares, (iii) 81,441 shares of common stock held by Balance Group LLC, of which Mr. Farkas is the managing member and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares, (iv) 7,200 shares of common stock held by the Michael D. Farkas Charitable Foundation, of which Mr. Farkas is the trustee and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares, (v) 80 shares of common stock held by Farkas Family Irrevocable Trust, of which Mr. Farkas is the trustee and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares, (vi) 15,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Farkas’ minor children, (vii) 163,823 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, and (viii) 1,145,914 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. For purposes of voting, on an actual basis, Mr. Farkas owns 10.9% of the outstanding shares.

Additionally, Mr. Farkas has a less than 5% ownership interest in Ardour Capital Investments LLC and Ardour Capital Partners LLC, which, to the Company’s knowledge, own 42,771 shares and 14,117 shares of common stock, respectively. Mr. Farkas has no voting or investment power with respect to the shares of common stock held by the Ardour Capital entities, and their ownership interests are not included in the shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Farkas.

Excludes a special performance option exercisable into 475,285 shares, which will vest if our stock price on the NASDAQ exchange reaches and remains on average for a period of 20 consecutive market days at a closing price of $90 per share during the four-year term of the option, as described under “Employment and Management Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements – Michael D. Farkas Employment Agreement.”

(4) Includes 67,962 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(5) Includes 151,770 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(6) Includes 51,104 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(7) Represents (i) 178,104 shares of common stock owned directly, (ii) 440,001 shares of common stock held by the Mahi Reddy 2021 Family Trust, of which Mr. Reddy is a trustee and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares and (iii) 440,002 shares of common stock held by the Seetha J. Anagol 2021 Family Trust, of which Mr. Reddy is a trustee and has voting and investment power with respect to such shares.

(8) Includes currently exercisable stock options and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,580,573 shares of common stock. Mr. Pastrone is included within these totals.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2022 with respect to our common stock that may be issued under our incentive compensation plans and other option grants.

Plan Category Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(a)
  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b)
  Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) 
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders  1,060,535  $24.68   2,769,245 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders  -   -   - 
Total  1,060,535  $24.68   2,769,245 

30

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Person Transaction Policy

Our policy with regard to related party transactions is for the Board as a whole to approve any material transactions involving our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

In addition to the compensation arrangements, including employment, termination of employment and change in control arrangements, discussed in Part II, the section titled “Employment and Management Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements,” the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2022 and each currently proposed transaction in which:

we have been or are to be a participant;
the amount involved exceeds $120,000; and
any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Certain persons who provide services to us, including Michael D. Farkas, our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Aviv Hillo, our General Counsel, also provide services and/or serve as officers or directors of Balance Labs, Inc., a consulting firm controlled by Mr. Farkas that provides business development and consulting services to startup development-stage businesses.

Director Independence

At least annually, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the independence of each non-employee director and makes recommendations to the Board and the Board affirmatively determines whether each director qualifies as independent. No director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). In addition, in affirmatively determining the independence of any director who will serve on the Compensation Committee, the Board must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to the Company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent of management in connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member. Each director must keep the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee fully and promptly informed as to any development affecting a director’s independence.

Our shares of common stock are listed for trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market. Under the rules of Nasdaq, “independent” directors must make up a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, applicable Nasdaq rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit and compensation committees be independent within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq rules. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

The Board has determined that each of our non-employee directors that served during 2022 (Messrs. Buffalino, Levine, Marks, van Montfrans and Richmond, and Ms. Perez-Carlton) were independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq and the requirements of the SEC. Messrs. Farkas, Jones and Reddy are not independent based on their service as employees of our company. In making its independence determinations, the Board reviewed direct and indirect transactions and relationships between each director, or any member of his or her immediate family, and us or one of our subsidiaries or affiliates based on information provided by the director, our records and publicly available information. None of our directors directly or indirectly provides any professional or consulting services to us.

As a result, a majority of our directors are independent, as required under applicable Nasdaq rules. As required under applicable Nasdaq rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

31

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Marcum LLP served as our independent registered public accountants for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2022

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2021

 
Audit Fees(1) $1,641,201  $679,561 
Audit-related fees(2)  -   - 
Tax fees(3)  -   - 
All other fees(4)  -   - 
Total $1,641,201  $679,561 

(1)Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated annual financial statements including fees related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, consultations in connection with acquisitions and issuances of auditor consents and comfort letters in connection with SEC registration statements.
(2)Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
(3)Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (domestic and international). These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, acquisitions and international tax planning.
(4)All other fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above.

Pre-Approval Policies

All audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to perform it. The Audit Committee uses the following procedures in pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. At or before the first meeting of the Audit Committee each year, the Audit Committee is presented with a detailed listing of the individual audit and non-audit services and fees (separately describing audit-related services, tax services and other services) expected to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm during the year. Quarterly, the Audit Committee is presented with an update of any new audit and non-audit services to be provided. The Audit Committee reviews the quarterly update and approves the services outlined therein if such services are acceptable to the Audit Committee.

32

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1.Consolidated Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of the Original 10-K.
2.Other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

 

(b)EXHIBITS
We have filed the exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index below in this Form 10-K/A:

Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference 

Filed or

Furnished

Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1 Share Purchase Agreement, dated April 21, 2021, between the Shareholders of Blue Corner NV and Blink Holdings B.V. 8-K 2.1 05/13/2021  
2.2 Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated April 22, 2022, between the shareholders of Electric Blue Limited, and Blink Holdings B.V. and Blink Charging Co. 8-K 2.1 04/26/2022  
2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 13, 2022, by and among Blink Charging Co., Blink Sub I Corp., Blink Sub II LLC, SemaConnect, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC (solely in its capacity as the stockholders’ representative) 8-K 2.1 06/14/2022  
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended most recently on August 17, 2017 10-K 3.1 04/17/2018  
3.2 Bylaws, as amended most recently on January 29, 2018 10-K 3.2 04/17/2018  
3.4 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series A Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.1 04/07/2022  
3.5 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series B Preferred Stock 8-K 3.2 04/07/2022  
3.6 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series C Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.3 04/07/2022  
3.7 Certificate of Withdrawal for Series D Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.4 04/07/2022  
4.3 Description of the Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 10-K 4.3 04/02/2020  
10.1* Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated October 29, 2010 10-K 10.17 04/16/2013  
10.2* First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated December 23, 2014 8-K 10.4 12/29/2014  
10.3 * Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated July 24, 2015 10-K 10.4 07/29/2016  
10.4 * Third Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated June 15, 2017 S-1/A 10.7 07/06/2017  
10.10 Patent License Agreement, dated March 29, 2012, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., Balance Holdings, LLC and Michael Farkas 10-K 10.21 04/16/2013  
10.11 Patent License Agreement, dated March 11, 2016, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., Balance Holdings, LLC and Michael Farkas 10-Q 10.3 08/04/2016  
10.12 Revenue Sharing Agreement, dated April 3, 2013, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., EV Pass Holdings, LLC, and Synapse Sustainability Trust, Inc. 8-K 10.2 04/26/2013  

33

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-10

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued

(in thousands)

  2023  2022  2021 
  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:            
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest $3,605  $-  $- 
Income taxes $-  $73  $- 
             
Non-cash investing and financing activities:            
Common stock issued as consideration for property and equipment $-  $-  $600 
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of Blue Corner $-  $-  $790 
Reclassification of common stock liability to equity $-  $-  $416 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations $7,401  $1,787  $2,129 
Property and equipment obtained in exchange for finance lease obligations $2,798  $931  $- 
Transfer of inventory to property and equipment $(1,786) $(5,283) $(2,189)
Accrued interest converted to notes payable $-  $-  $5 
Common stock issued in satisfaction of accrued issuable equity $2,600  $-  $- 
Reclassification from inventory to fixed assets $-  $-  $60 
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of SemaConnect $-  $113,837  $- 
Common stock issued as purchase consideration of Electric Blue $-  $2,852  $- 
Intangible assets obtained in exchange for financing liability $122  $660  $- 
Note receivable applied to purchase consideration of Envoy $(1,321) $-  $- 
Surrender and cancellation of common stock $(197) $-  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

10.13 Office Lease Agreement, dated April 20, 2018, between Euro American Group, Inc. and Car Charging Inc. 8-K 10.1 05/15/2018  
10.14* 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan Proxy - 08/14/2018  
10.17* Employment Agreement, dated January 9, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Donald Engel 8-K 10.1 01/10/2020  
10.18* Employment Offer Letter, dated February 7, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael P. Rama 8-K 10.1 02/11/2020  
10.20* Employment Offer Letter, dated as of March 29, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones 8-K 10.1 04/20/2020  
10.21* Executive Chairman and CEO Employment Agreement, dated May 28, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael D. Farkas 8-K 10.1 06/04/2021  
10.22* Employment Agreement, dated December 27, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones 8-K 10.1 12/29/2021  
10.23* Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Harjinder Bhade 10-K/A 10.20 04/29/2022  
10.24* Employment Agreement, dated May 19, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael P. Rama 8-K 10.1 05/24/2022  
10.25* Employment Agreement, dated May 19, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and Aviv Hillo 8-K 10.2 05/24/2022  
10.26 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2022, by and among Blink Charging Co., the equityholders of SemaConnect, Inc. and each equityholder of SemaConnect, Inc. to which Blink shares were issued 8-K 10.1 06/21/2022  
10.27* Employment Offer Letter, dated June 15, 2022, between SemaConnect, LLC, a Blink Charging company, and Mahi Reddy 8-K 10.2 06/21/2022  
10.29 Sales Agreement, dated September 2, 2022, between Blink Charging Co. and the Sales Agents 8-K 10.1 09/02/2022  
10.30* Employment Offer Letter, dated June 15, 2022, between SemaConnect LLC and Mark Pastrone, as assumed by Blink Charging Co. on November 29, 2022 8-K 10.1 12/05/2022  
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant 10-K 21.1 03/14/2023  
23.1 Consent of Marcum LLP 10-K 23.1 03/14/2023  
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer 10-K 31.1 03/14/2023  
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer 10-K 31.2 03/14/2023  
31.3 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer       X
31.4 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer       X
32.1** Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer 10-K 32.1 03/14/2023  
32.2** Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer 10-K 32.2 03/14/2023  
101.INS XBRL Instance.       X
101.XSD XBRL Schema.       X
101.PRE XBRL Presentation.       X
101.CAL XBRL Calculation.       X
101.DEF XBRL Definition.       X
101.LAB XBRL Label.       X
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).       X

*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

34
F-11

SIGNATURES

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

1. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Blink Charging Co., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Blink”), is a leading manufacturer, owner, operator and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services in the rapidly growing U.S. and international markets for EVs. Blink offers residential and commercial EV charging equipment and services, enabling EV drivers to recharge at various location types. Blink’s principal line of products and services is its nationwide Blink EV charging networks (the “Blink Networks”) and Blink EV charging equipment, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (“EVSE”), and other EV-related services. The Blink Networks is a proprietary, cloud-based system that operates, maintains and manages Blink charging stations and handles the associated charging data, back-end operations and payment processing. The Blink Networks provide property owners, managers, parking companies, state and municipal entities, and other types of commercial customers (“Property Partners”) with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations. The Blink Networks also provide EV drivers with vital station information, including station location, availability and fees. Blink also operates an EV based ride-sharing business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blink Mobility LLC.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

LIQUIDITY

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $121,691 and working capital of $152,033. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $203,693, $91,560 and $55,119, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, the Company used cash in operating activities of $97,570, $82,365, and $40,570, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 30,914,695 shares of common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program for aggregate gross proceeds of $116,651, less issuance costs of $2,562 which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. See Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 8,177,472 shares of common stock aggregate gross proceeds of $25,651 and net proceeds of $25,136.

In February 2023, the Company completed an underwritten registered public offering of 8,333,333 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $12.00 per share. The Company received approximately $100,000 in gross proceeds from the public offering and approximately $95,000 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by the Company. See Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity.

The Company has not yet achieved profitability and expects to continue to incur cash outflows from operations. It is expected that the Company’s operating expenses will continue to increase and, as a result, it will eventually need to generate significant product revenues to achieve profitability. Historically, the Company has been able to raise funds to support its business operations, although there can be no assurance that it will be successful in raising significant additional funds in the future. The Company expects that its cash on hand will fund its operations for at least 12 months after the issuance date of these financial statements.

Since inception, the Company’s operations have primarily been funded through proceeds received in equity and debt financing. The Company believes it has access to capital resources and continues to evaluate additional financing opportunities. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds the Company might raise will enable the Company to complete its development initiatives or attain profitable operations.

The Company’s operating needs include the planned costs to operate its business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. The Company’s future capital requirements and the adequacy of its available funds will depend on many factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully commercialize its products and services, competing technological and market developments, and the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement its product and service offerings. During 2023, the Company commenced a plan designed to improve the Company’s liquidity by enhancing revenue economics and reducing selling, general, and administrative expenses. The plan seeks to achieve these goals by increasing gross profit through product optimization, integration of SemaConnect, Blink UK/EB and Blue Corner acquisitions, and reduction of operating expenses through cost avoidance and cost cutting strategies. There can be no assurances these strategies will be achieved.

F-12

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.2.

BLINK CHARGING CO.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
Date: May 1, 2023By:/s/ Michael D. Farkas
Michael D. Farkas

Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Date: May 1, 2023

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

By:/s/ Michael P. Rama
Michael P. Rama

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Blink Charging Co. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 include the results of operations of BlueLA Carsharing LLC, U-Go Stations Inc., Blue Corner NV, Electric Blue and SemaConnect, Inc. from their respective dates of acquisition.

USE OF ESTIMATES

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, together with amounts disclosed in the related notes to the financial statements. The Company’s significant estimates used in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, stock-based compensation, accounts receivable reserves, inventory valuations, the carrying amount of goodwill, the valuation allowance related to the Company’s deferred tax assets, the carrying amount of intangible assets, right-of- use assets and related leases payable, estimates of future EV sales and the effects thereon, derivative liabilities and the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company and general economic conditions. It is reasonably possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates and could cause actual results to differ from those estimates.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and is measured using inputs in one of the following three categories:

Level 1 measurements are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

Level 2 measurements are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active or market data other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 measurements are based on unobservable data that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company considers cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to meet the definition of financial instruments. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the relatively short period of time between their origination and their expected realization or payment. The carrying amount of consideration payable approximates its fair value as the terms are comparable to terms currently offered by local lending institutions for arrangements with similar terms to industry peers with comparable credit characteristics.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has cash on deposits in several financial institutions which, at times, may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. The Company has not experienced losses in such accounts and periodically evaluates the creditworthiness of its financial institutions. The Company reduces its credit risk by placing its cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions.

ACCOUNTS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Accounts and other receivables are carried at their contractual amounts, less a provision for current expected credit losses. The reserve represents the Company’s best estimate of expected credit losses it may experience in the Company’s receivable portfolio. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there was an allowance for expected credit losses of $6,750 and $2,548, respectively. Management estimates the allowance for credit losses based on an ongoing review of existing economic conditions, the financial conditions of the customers, historical trends in credit losses, and the amount and age of past due accounts.

F-13

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

 

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

INVENTORY

Inventory is comprised of electric charging stations, related parts and components, sub-components, sub-assemblies and finished products. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. Inventory that is sold to third parties is included within cost of sales and inventory that is installed on the premises of participating owner/operator properties, where the Company retains ownership, is transferred to property and equipment at the carrying value of the inventory. Cost of parts and components include the purchase and related costs incurred in bringing the products to their present location and condition. The Company periodically reviews for slow-moving, excess or obsolete inventories. Products that are determined to be obsolete, if any, are written down to net realizable value. Based on the aforementioned periodic reviews, the Company recorded an inventory reserve for slow-moving or excess inventory of $777 and $298 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s inventory was comprised $33,902 of finished goods that were available for sale and $14,040 of raw material and work in process.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization which is recorded commencing at the in-service date using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. 

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Useful Lives
Asset(In Years)
Computer software and office and computer equipment3 - 5
Machinery and equipment, automobiles, furniture and fixtures3 - 10
Installed Level 2 electric vehicle charging stations3 - 7
Installed Level 3 (DC Fast Chargers (“DCFC”)) electric vehicle charging stations5
Buildings39

When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the consolidated statements of operations for the respective period. Minor additions and repairs are expensed in the period incurred. Major additions and repairs which extend the useful life of existing assets are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over their remaining estimated useful lives.

EV charging stations represents the cost, net of accumulated depreciation, of charging equipment and installation of the charging equipment that have been installed on the premises of participating owner/operator properties or are earmarked to be installed.

The Company’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by monitoring current selling prices of car charging units in the open market, the adoption rate of various auto manufacturers in the EV market and projected car charging utilization at various public car charging stations throughout its network in determining fair value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount.

As electric vehicle charging requirements and technologies change, driven by federal, state or local regulatory authorities or by electric vehicle manufacturers or other technology or services providers for the charging station industry, in particular cellular connectivity technology, the Company may need to upgrade or adapt its charging station products or introduce new products in order to serve new vehicles, conform to new standards, or adapt new technologies to serve existing customers or new customers at substantial research, development, and network upgrades costs. During 2021, many cellular technology providers announced they will require the upgrade from 2G/3G connectivity to 4G LTE during 2022 (the “Upgrade”). During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company incurred $3,809 related to these upgrades. As of December 31, 2023, the charger upgrades were substantially complete.

See Note 4 – Property and Equipment for additional details.

F-14

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

GOODWILL

Goodwill is the excess of consideration paid for an acquired entity over the fair value of the amounts assigned to assets acquired, including other identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed in a business combination. To determine the amount of goodwill resulting from a business combination, the Company performs an assessment to determine the acquisition date fair value of the acquired company’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities.

Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. An entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. These qualitative factors include: macroeconomic and industry conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events. If the entity determines that this threshold is met, then the Company may apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The Company determines fair value through multiple valuation techniques and weights the results accordingly. The Company is required to make certain subjective and complex judgments in assessing whether an event of impairment of goodwill has occurred, including assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of its reporting units. The Company has elected to perform its annual goodwill impairment review on November 1 of each year utilizing a qualitative assessment to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of its reporting units was less than their respective carrying values and concluded that no impairment existed.

See Note 6 - Goodwill for further information.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Identifiable intangible assets primarily include trade name, customer relationships, favorable leases, internally developed technology, capitalized engineering costs and non-compete agreements. Amortizable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. If an indicator of impairment exists, the Company will compare the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then impairment, if any, is measured as the difference between fair value and carrying value, with fair value typically based on a discounted cash flow model.

SEGMENTS

The Company operates a single segment business. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, views the Company’s operating performance on a consolidated basis as Blink’s only business is the sale and distribution of electric vehicle charging equipment and its associated revenues earned from customers and/or Property Partners who use equipment connected to the Company’s network.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The Company’s reporting currency is the United States dollar. The functional currency of certain subsidiaries is the Euro, Indian Rupee, and Pound Sterling. Assets and liabilities are translated based on the exchange rates at the balance sheet date (1.1039 for the Euro, 0.0120 for the Indian Rupee and $1.1533 for the Pound Sterling as of December 31, 2023; 1.0701 for the Euro, 0.0121 for the Indian Rupee and 1.1299 for the Pound Sterling as of December 31, 2022; 1.1325 for the Euro, 0.0135 for the Indian Rupee and 1.3497 for the Pound Sterling as of December 31, 2021). Expense accounts are translated at the weighted average exchange rate for the period (1.0980 for the Euro, 0.0120 for the Indian Rupee and 1.2664 for the Pound Sterling during the year ended December 31, 2023; 1.0527 for the Euro, 0.0121 for the Indian Rupee and 1.1903 for the Pound Sterling during the year ended December 31, 2022; 1.1325 for the Euro, 0.0133 for the Indian Rupee and 1.3497 for the Pound Sterling during the year ended December 31, 2021). Equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments are recognized in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of an entity from all sources other than investments by owners or distributions to owners and includes foreign currency translation adjustments as described above. Transaction gains (losses) attributable to foreign exchange were $140, ($600) and ($124) during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

F-15

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue primarily from four different types of contracts with customers:

Product salesRevenue is recognized at the point where the customer obtains control of the goods and the Company satisfies its performance obligation, which generally is at the time it ships the product to the customer or installation of the product.
Charging service revenue – company-owned charging stations - Revenue is recognized at the point when a particular charging session is completed.
Network fees and otherRepresents a stand-ready obligation whereby the Company is obligated to perform over a period of time and, as a result, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract term. Network fees are billed annually.
Other Other revenues primarily comprises of revenues generated from alternative fuel credits.

The following table summarizes our revenue recognized in the consolidated statements of operations:

SCHEDULE OF REVENUE RECOGNITION BY CONTRACT

  2023  2022  2021 
  For The Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Revenues - Recognized at a Point in Time            
Product sales $109,416  $46,018  $15,480 
Charging service revenue - company-owned charging stations  15,646   6,866   2,978 
Other  1,026   1,393   426 
Total Revenues - Recognized at a Point in Time  126,088   54,277   18,884 
             
Revenues - Recognized Over a Period of Time:            
Network and other fees  10,739   5,298   887 
Total Revenues - Recognized Over a Period of Time  10,739   5,298   887 
             
Revenues- Other            
Ride-sharing services  3,302   1,268   769 
Grant and fees rebate  469   296   400 
Total Revenues - Other  3,771   1,564   1,169 
             
Total Revenue $140,598  $61,139  $20,940 

The following table summarizes our revenue recognized in the consolidated statements of operations by geographical area:

SCHEDULE OF REVENUE RECOGNITION BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

  2023  2022  2021 
  For The Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Revenues by Geographical Area            
U.S.A $104,714  $40,828  $10,978 
International  35,884   20,311   9,962 
Total Revenue $140,598  $61,139  $20,940 

F-16

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

REVENUE RECOGNITION – CONTINUED

The timing of the Company’s revenue recognition may differ from the timing of payment by its customers. A receivable is recorded when revenue is recognized prior to payment and the Company has an unconditional right to payment. Alternatively, when payment precedes the provision of the related services, the Company records deferred revenue until the performance obligations are satisfied.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $26,075 related to contract liabilities where performance obligations have not yet been satisfied, which has been included within deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2023. The Company expects to satisfy $13,613 of its remaining performance obligations for network fees, warranty revenue, product sales, and other and recognize the revenue within the next twelve months.

The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient to expense costs to obtain contracts at the time the liability is incurred when the expected amortization period is one year or less.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized $2,794 of revenues related to network fees and warranty contracts that were included in deferred revenues as of December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized $1,136 of revenues related to network fees and warranty contracts that were included in deferred revenues as of December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $514of revenues related to network fees and warranty contracts that were included in deferred revenues as of December 31, 2020.  

During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, there was no revenue recognized from performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods.

Grants, fees rebates and alternative fuel credits, which are not within the scope of ASC 606, pertaining to revenues and periodic expenses, are recognized as income when the related revenue and/or periodic expense are recorded. Grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the related depreciation expense of the related asset over the useful life of the charging station. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded $469, $296 and $400, respectively, related to grant and rebate revenue. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized $214, $296 and $207, respectively, of revenue related to alternative fuel credits, which is included within other revenue on the consolidated statements of operations.

Car-sharing services is accounted for under ASC Topic 842, Leases, and pertains to revenues and expenses related to a car-sharing services agreement with the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service. The Company accounts for such rentals as operating leases. The lease terms are included in the Company’s contracts, and the determination of whether the Company’s contracts contain leases generally does not require significant assumptions or judgments. The Company’s lease revenues do not include material amounts of variable payments. The Company does not provide an option for the lessee to purchase the rented equipment at the end of the lease.

The Company is unsure of when the customer will return rented equipment. As such, the Company does not know how much the customer will owe it upon return of the equipment and, therefore, cannot provide a maturity analysis of future lease payments. The Company’s equipment is generally rented for short periods of time (generally a few minutes to a few hours). Lessees do not provide residual value guarantees on rented equipment.

The Company expects to derive significant future benefits from its equipment following the end of the rental term. The Company’s equipment is typically rented for the majority of the time that the Company owns it. The Company recognizes revenue over the contractual period of performance of the subscription which are short term in nature. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized $3,302, $1,268 and $769, respectively, related to ride-sharing services revenue.

F-17

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

ADVERTISING COSTS

The Company participates in various advertising programs. All costs related to advertising of the Company’s products and services are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising costs charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were $2,321, $2,618 and $84, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations

CONCENTRATIONS

As of December 31, 2023, accounts payable to two significant vendors were approximately 16% and 10% of total accounts payable. As of December 31, 2022, accounts payable to a significant vendor were approximately 15% of total accounts payable. During the year ended December 31, 2021, sales to a significant customer represented 12% of total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company made purchases from a significant supplier that represented 24% of total purchases. During the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company made purchases from another significant supplier that represented19% and 23% respectively, of total purchases.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. The fair value of the award is measured on the grant date and then is recognized over the period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. The Company computes the fair value of equity-classified warrants and options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

LEASES

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property and equipment and finance lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at commencement date. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company provides charging services at designated locations on the hosts property at which the charging station is situated. In consideration thereof, the host shares in the monthly revenue generated by the charging station on a percentage basis. As the charging station monthly revenue generated is variable, the host’s monthly revenue derived there from is similarly variable. In accordance with ASC 842 the hosts’ portion of revenue is variable and not predicated on an index or rate, as defined, these payments are not within the scope ASC 842.

F-18

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

INCOME TAXES

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of items that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, since it is more likely than not that the future tax benefit on such temporary differences will not be realized.

The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain income tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement by examining taxing authorities. The Company has open tax years going back to 2020 (or the tax year ended December 31, 2009 if the Company were to utilize its NOLs) which will be subject to audit by federal and state authorities upon filing. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on uncertain income tax positions in interest expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2023 the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the common share equivalents had been issued (computed using the treasury stock or if converted method), if dilutive.

The following common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

SCHEDULE OF OUTSTANDING DILUTED SHARES EXCLUDED FROM DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE COMPUTATION 

             
  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Warrants  1,150,152   1,592,203   3,274,800 
Options  982,844   1,060,535   983,505 
Unvested restricted common stock  -   -   50,831 
Total potentially dilutive shares  2,132,996   2,652,738   4,309,136 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

F-19

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In August 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-05, “Business Combinations - Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement,” under which an entity that qualifies as either a joint venture or a corporate joint venture as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) master glossary is required to apply a new basis of accounting upon the formation of the joint venture. Specifically, the ASU provides that a joint venture or a corporate joint venture (collectively, “joint ventures”) must initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value on the formation date. The amendments are effective for all joint ventures within the ASU’s scope that are formed on or after January 1, 2025. Early adoption is permitted in any annual or interim period as of the beginning of the related fiscal year. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, “Disclosure Improvements.” For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements and for entities required to file or furnish financial statements with or to the SEC in preparation for the sale of or for purposes of issuing securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of that related disclosure from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K becomes effective. If by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the applicable requirement from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K, the pending content of the related amendment will be removed from the Codification and will not become effective for any entity. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2023, the FASB issued an accounting standards update ASU 2023-07 “Segment Reporting: Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures” related to improvements to reportable segment disclosures. The amendments in this update require additional disclosure of significant expenses related to our reportable segments, additional segment disclosures on an interim basis, and qualitative disclosures regarding the decision making process for segment resources. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures” related to improvements to income tax disclosures. The amendments in this update require enhanced jurisdictional and other disaggregated disclosures for the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-20

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805)” (“ASU 2021-08”). The ASU improves the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination by addressing diversity in practice and inconsistency related to recognition of an acquired contract liability and payment terms and their effect on subsequent revenue recognized by the acquirer. The update is effective for annual and interim periods within the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2022, and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company adopted ASU 2021-08 effective January 1, 2023 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs) and Vintage Disclosures”, that eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors in Subtopic 310-40, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Rather than applying the recognition and measurement guidance for TDRs, an entity must apply the loan refinancing and restructuring guidance to determine whether a modification results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. The amendment also requires an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases within the scope of Subtopic 326. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the amendments prospectively except for the transition method related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs, an entity has the option to apply a modified retrospective transition method, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption. Early adoption of the amendments is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments in an interim period, the guidance should be applied as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. An entity may elect to early adopt the amendments about TDRs and related disclosure enhancements separately from the amendments related to vintage disclosures. The Company adopted ASU 2022-02 effective January 1, 2023 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, “Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions” which amends guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The guidance clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring the fair value. The guidance also clarifies that an entity cannot, as a separate unit of account, recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction. The amendment requires the following disclosures for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions: the fair value of equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions; the nature and remaining duration of the restriction(s); and the circumstances that could cause a lapse in the restriction(s). The amended guidance is effective January 1, 2024 on a prospective basis. The Company adopted ASU 2022-03 effective January 1, 2024 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In September 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-04, “Liabilities - Supplier Finance Programs (Subtopic 405-50) Disclosure of Supplier Finance Program Obligations”, to require entities that use supplier finance programs in connection with purchase of goods and services to disclose the key terms of such programs and information about obligations outstanding at the end of the reporting period, including a rollforward of those obligations of where in the financial statements outstanding amounts are present. The guidance does not affect the recognition, measurement, or financial statement presentation of supplier finance program obligations. The Company adopted ASU 2022-04 effective January 1, 2023 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848”, that extends the period of time preparers can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance provided by ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01, which are discussed above. ASU 2022-06, which was effective upon issuance, defers the sunset date of this prior guidance from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024, after which entities will no longer be permitted to apply the relief guidance in Topic 848. The Company adopted ASU 2022-06 effective January 1, 2023 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

F-21

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS -CONTINUED

In July 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-03, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Equity (Topic 505), and Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 120, SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 EITF Meeting, and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280—General Revision of Regulation S-X: Income or Loss Applicable to Common Stock.” ASU 2023-03 amends the ASC for SEC updates pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 120; SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Meeting; and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280 - General Revision of Regulation S-X: Income or Loss Applicable to Common Stock. These updates were immediately effective and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

ENVOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

On April 18, 2023, the Company, Blink Mobility, LLC, a California limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Mobility”), and Mobility Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobility (“Merger Sub”), entered into and, after all parties met the closing conditions, consummated the transactions contemplated under an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 18, 2023 (the “Acquisition Agreement”), with Envoy Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Envoy”). Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Envoy, whereupon the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub ceased, and Envoy was the surviving corporation of the merger and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobility (the “Acquisition”).

Under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the acquisition consideration was up to $35,500, paid as follows: (i) $6,000 in cash paid upon the closing of the Acquisition Agreement (the “Closing”); (ii) a promissory note of Mobility in the principal amount of $5,000 which bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and becomes due 12 months from Closing; (iii) a promissory note of Mobility in the principal amount of $2,000 which bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and becomes due 18 months from Closing; and (iv)(a) in the event of an initial public offering or direct listing of Mobility or Mobility’s successor within 24 months after the Closing (and shares of common stock of the Company are not issued in lieu thereof), $18,500, $21,000 or $22,500 worth of shares of common stock of Mobility or Mobility’s successor, depending on the timing of such offering or listing, (b) in the event there is no initial public offering or direct listing of Mobility or Mobility’s successor within 24 months after the Closing, $21,000 worth of shares of common stock of the Company, or (c) at the Company’s option, a combination of cash and common stock of the Company with an aggregate value of $21,000.

The aggregate purchase price was $30,900, which included working capital deficit of $1,595 and closing date cash of $19. The fair value of the consideration paid in the acquisition consisted of: (a) $6,000 in cash ($4,679 was paid at Closing and $1,321 was paid prior to Closing in the form of a note receivable); (b) $6,782 in aggregate promissory notes; and (c) $18,118 in common stock of Mobility subject to the conditions described above. The payment of shares of common stock of Mobility or Mobility’s successor, if any, will be based on the public offering price per share of such stock in the initial public offering. The payment of shares of common stock of the Company, if any, will be based on the average of the daily-weighted average prices for such stock on each of the 60 days ending on the day prior to issuance thereof. The common stock consideration payable in the amount of $18,118 is included within consideration payable on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023.

The Company engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist to assist in the determination of fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Envoy. The final determination of the fair value of assets and liabilities will be completed within the one-year measurement period as required by ASC 805. The Company recognized certain measurement period adjustments, as summarized in the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the tables below. Measurement period adjustments are recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined and calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The acquisition will necessitate the use of this measurement period to adequately analyze and assess the factors used in establishing the asset and liability fair values as of the relevant acquisition date, including intangible assets, accounts receivable and certain fixed assets.

F-21

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ENVOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CONTINUED

SCHEDULE OF ASSETS ACQUIRED AND LIABILITIES ASSUMED

  Purchase Price Allocation
(Preliminary)
  Measurement Period Adjustments  Purchase Price Allocation
(As Revised)
 
Purchase Consideration:            
Cash $6,000  $-  $6,000 
Deferred cash consideration  6,782   -   6,782 
Common stock  18,118   -   18,118 
             
Total Purchase Consideration $30,900  $-  $30,900 
             
Less:            
Trade name $291  $(125) $166 
Customer relationships  4,170   (2,245)  1,925 
Internally developed technology  334   (159)  175 
Non-compete agreements  -   11   11 
Property and equipment  1,802   -   1,802 
Other assets  52   -   52 
Notes payable- non current portion  (24)  -   (24)
Lease liability- non current portion  (1,730)  -   (1,730)
Debt-free net working capital deficit  (1,792)  197   (1,595)
             
Fair Value of Identified Net Assets $3,103  $(2,321) $782 
             
Remaining Unidentified Goodwill Value $27,797  $2,321  $30,118 

In connection with the acquisition of Envoy, the Company acquired intangible assets in the form of a trade name, customer relationships, internally developed technology and non-compete agreements. The Company used the relief from royalty method when determining the fair value of the acquired trade name and internally developed technology. The fair value was determined by applying an estimated royalty rate to revenues, measuring the value the Company would pay in royalties to a market participant if it did not own the trade name and internally developed technology and had to license it from a third party. The trademark was assigned a useful life of 2 years and the internally developed technology was assigned a useful life of 3 years.

When determining fair value of customer relationships, a form of income approach, known as the multi period excess earnings method was used. The fair value was determined by calculating the present value of estimated future operating cash flows generated from the existing customers less costs to realize the revenue. The Company applied a discount rate of 21%, which reflected the nature of the assets as they relate to the risk and uncertainty of the estimated future operating cash flows. Other significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the customer contracts include an assumed income tax rate of 26%. The customer relationships were assigned a useful life of 5.3 years.

The Company used a discounted cash flow model when determining the fair value of the non-compete agreements. Significant assumptions included a discount rate of 21% and an assumed income tax rate of 26%. The non-compete agreements were assigned a useful life of 2 years.

The fair value of working capital accounts were determined to be the carrying values due to the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.

The fair value of property and equipment was estimated by applying the cost approach. The cost approach uses the replacement or reproduction cost as an indicator of fair value. The assumptions of the cost approach include replacement cost new, projected capital expenditures, and physical deterioration factors including economic useful life, remaining useful life, age, and effective age.

As of December 31, 2023, the estimated fair value of the common stock consideration payable was $18,118. The Company uses a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach as a valuation technique to determine the fair value of the common stock consideration payable on the acquisition date and at each reporting period. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are the probability outcome percentages that are assigned to each scenario. Significant increases or decreases to either of these inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher or lower liability with a higher liability capped by the contractual maximum of the common stock consideration liability.

F-22

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ENVOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – CONTINUED

The components of debt free net working capital deficit are as follows:

  Purchase Price Allocation
(Preliminary)
  Measurement Period Adjustments  Purchase Price Allocation
(As Revised)
 
Current assets:            
Cash $19  $-  $19 
Accounts receivable  391   -   391 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  254   -   254 
             
Total current assets $664  $-  $664 
             
Less current liabilities:            
Accounts payable $853  $-  $853 
Current portion of lease liability  591   -   591 
Current portion of notes payable  7   -   7 
Deferred revenue  229   -   229 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  776   (197)  579 
             
Total current liabilities $2,456  $(197) $2,259 
             
Net working capital deficit $(1,792) $197  $(1,595)

Goodwill was recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired and the amount is attributable to the reputation of the business acquired, the workforce in place and the synergies to be achieved from this acquisition. Goodwill of $30,118 from the acquisition of Envoy is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the results of operations of Envoy from April 18, 2023 to December 31, 2023 and do not include results of operations for periods prior to April 18, 2023. The results of operations of Envoy from April 18, 2023 to December 31, 2023 included revenues of $2,743 and a net loss of $2,620.

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 as if the acquisition of Envoy occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2022. The pro forma information provided below is compiled from the preacquisition financial information of Envoy and includes pro forma adjustments to give effect to (i) interest expense related to notes issued as consideration and (ii) amortization expense associated with the acquired intangible assets. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of (i) the results of operations that would have occurred had the operations of this acquisition actually been acquired at the beginning of fiscal year 2022 or (ii) future results of operations.

SCHEDULE OF PROFORMA INFORMATION OF OPERATIONS

  2023  2022 
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
  (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Revenues $140,765  $64,509 
Net loss $(204,949) $(96,358)

As of the date of the acquisition, the Company expected to collect all contractual cash flows related to receivables acquired in the acquisition. Acquisition-related costs of $356 expensed as incurred and are recorded within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

F-23

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

SEMACONNECT, INC.

On June 15, 2022, the Company completed the acquisition of SemaConnect, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SemaConnect”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 13, 2022 (“Acquisition Agreement”), by and among the Company, Blink Sub I Corp., Blink Sub II LLC, SemaConnect and Shareholder Representative Services LLC (solely in its capacity as the stockholders’ representative). Following the closing of the acquisition, SemaConnect became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. SemaConnect is a leading provider of EV charging infrastructure solutions in North America.

The aggregate purchase price was $200,573, which included excess working capital of $1,229 and closing date cash of $3,639. The consideration paid in the acquisition consisted of: (a) $86,736 in cash, (i) of which $46,136 was paid at the closing of the Acquisition Agreement (“Closing”) and (ii) the remaining $40,600 is payable (bearing interest at 7%) until not earlier than nine months following the Closing and not later than three years following the Closing; and (b) 7,454,975 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $113,837. Included in the cash consideration was $8,103 related to payments due to stock option holders of SemaConnect. Subsequent to the closing of the acquisition, payments to the stock option holder were made after the stock option holder signed an option cash-out agreement.

Goodwill was recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired and the amount is attributable to the reputation of the business acquired, the workforce in place and the synergies to be achieved from this acquisition. Goodwill of $174,439 from the acquisition of SemaConnect is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of SemaConnect:

SCHEDULE OF ASSETS ACQUIRED AND LIABILITIES ASSUMED

     
  Purchase Price Allocation 
Purchase Consideration:    
Cash $46,136 
Deferred cash consideration  40,600 
Common stock  113,837 
     
Total Purchase Consideration $200,573 
     
Less:    
Trade name $1,831 
Customer relationships  15,055 
Internally developed technology  3,607 
Non-compete agreements  241 
Property and equipment  614 
Right of use asset  1,092 
Other assets  449 
Deferred revenue- non current portion  (702)
Lease liability- non current portion  (611)
Debt-free net working capital  4,558 
     
Fair Value of Identified Net Assets $26,134 
     
Remaining Unidentified Goodwill Value $174,439 

F-24

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

SEMACONNECT, INC. - CONTINUED

In connection with the acquisition of SemaConnect, the Company acquired tradename, customer relationships, internally developed technology and non-compete agreements.

The Company used the relief from royalty method when determining the fair value of the acquired trademark and internally developed technology. The fair value was determined by applying an estimated royalty rate to revenues, measuring the value the Company would pay in royalties to a market participant if it did not own the trademark and internally developed technology and had to license it from a third party. The trademark was assigned a useful life of two years and the internally developed technology was assigned a useful life of three years.

When determining fair value of customer relationships, a form of income approach, known as the multi period excess earnings method was used. The fair value was determined by calculating the present value of estimated future operating cash flows generated from the existing customers less costs to realize the revenue. The Company applied a discount rate of 20%, which reflected the nature of the assets as they relate to the risk and uncertainty of the estimated future operating cash flows. Other significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the customer contracts include an assumed income tax rate of 26%. The customer relationships were assigned a 5 year useful life.

The Company used a discounted cash flow model when determining the fair value of the non-compete agreements, significant assumptions include a discount rate of 20% and an assumed income tax rate of 26%. The non-compete agreements were assigned a useful life of two years.

The fair value of working capital accounts were determined to be the carrying values due to the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.

F-25

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

SEMACONNECT, INC. - CONTINUED

The fair value of property and equipment was estimated by applying the cost approach. The cost approach uses the replacement or reproduction cost as an indicator of fair value. The assumptions of the cost approach include replacement cost new, projected capital expenditures, and physical deterioration factors including economic useful life, remaining useful life, age, and effective age.

The components of debt free net working capital are as follows:

Current assets:    
Cash $3,753 
Restricted cash  8,103 
Accounts receivable  5,515 
Inventory  5,472 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,309 
     
Total current assets $24,152 
     
Less current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $2,305 
Merger consideration payable  8,103 
Current portion of lease liability  481 
Current portion of notes payable  186 
Deferred revenue  2,677 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  5,842 
     
Total current liabilities $19,594 
     
Debt free net working capital $4,558 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the results of operations of SemaConnect from June 15, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and do not include results of operations for periods prior to June 15, 2022. The results of operations of SemaConnect from June 15, 2022 to December 31,2022 included revenues of $18,411 and a net loss of $3,295.

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 as if the acquisition of SemaConnect had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2021. The pro forma information provided below is compiled from the pre-acquisition financial information of SemaConnect and includes pro forma adjustments for adjustments to certain expenses. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of (i) the results of operations that would have occurred had the operations of this acquisition actually been acquired at the beginning of fiscal year 2021 or (ii) future results of operations:

SCHEDULE OF PROFORMA INFORMATION OF OPERATIONS

         
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2022  2021 
  (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Revenues $70,078  $33,390 
Net loss $(102,444) $(69,012)

The above pro forma information includes pro forma adjustments to give effect to the amortization of the acquired intangible assets to the 2021 historical period.

As of the date of the acquisition, the Company expected to collect all contractual cash flows related to receivables acquired in the acquisition. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and are recorded within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Acquisition-related costs were $3,407 during the year ended December 31, 2022.

F-26

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ELECTRIC BLUE LIMITED

On April 22, 2022, pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 22, 2022, the Company acquired, through its Dutch subsidiary, Blink Holdings B.V., all of the outstanding capital stock of Electric Blue Limited (“EB”), a private company limited by shares and registered in England and Wales, from its shareholders. Headquartered in St. Albans, United Kingdom, EB is a leading provider of electric vehicle charging and sustainable energy solutions and technologies. EB works with local authorities and businesses to create the infrastructure the United Kingdom needs to meet the 2050 net zero emissions target and prepare for the 2030 ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans.

The fair value purchase price for the acquisition of all of EB’s outstanding capital stock was $19,317, consisting of $12,651 in cash, 152,803 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $2,852, plus the contingent consideration described in the following paragraph. The fair value of the common stock consideration was determined by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the acquisition date.

In addition, provided EB reaches specified gross revenue or new EV charger installation targets over the three years post-closing, the Company also agreed to issue up to approximately $6,400 in additional shares of its common stock to EB shareholders (the “Contingent Consideration”). The Contingent Consideration was recorded at an estimated fair value of $3,814. As of December 31, 2022, the estimated fair value of the Contingent Consideration was $1,316. The Company uses a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach as a valuation technique to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on the acquisition date and at each reporting period. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are projections over the earn-out period, and the probability outcome percentages that are assigned to each scenario. Significant increases or decreases to either of these inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher or lower liability with a higher liability capped by the contractual maximum of the contingent consideration liabilities.

Of the purchase price to be issued to the EB shareholders at closing, approximately $650 in cash and 25,466 shares of common stock are being held in escrow accounts for periods of 12 months (cash escrow) and 18 months (stock escrow), respectively, following the closing to cover any losses or damages we may incur by reason of, among other things, any misrepresentation or breach of warranty by EB under the Sale and Purchase Agreement.

Goodwill was recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired and the amount is attributable to the reputation of the business acquired, the workforce in place and the synergies to be achieved from this acquisition. Goodwill of $10,443 from the acquisition of EB is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

F-27

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ELECTRIC BLUE LIMITED – CONTINUED

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of EB:

SCHEDULE OF ASSETS ACQUIRED AND LIABILITIES ASSUMED

     
Preliminary purchase price allocation   
  Purchase Price Allocation 
Purchase Consideration:    
Cash $12,651 
Common stock  2,852 
Contingent consideration  3,814 
     
Total Purchase Consideration $19,317 
     
Less:    
Trade name $500 
Customer relationships  4,856 
Internally developed technology  515 
Non-compete agreements  1,992 
Property and equipment  4,325 
Deferred revenue- non current portion  (2,689)
Debt-free net working capital deficit  (625)
     
Fair Value of Identified Net Assets $8,874 
     
Remaining Unidentified Goodwill Value $10,443 

F-28

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ELECTRIC BLUE LIMITED – CONTINUED

The components of debt free net working capital are as follows:

  Purchase Price Allocation 
Current assets:    
Cash $1,291 
Accounts receivable  1,618 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  508 
     
Total current assets $3,417 
     
Less current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $647 
Current portion of lease liabilities  22 
Current portion of notes payable  611 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,762 
     
Total current liabilities $4,042 
     
Debt free net working capital deficit $(625)

The Company used the relief from royalty method when determining the fair value of the acquired trademark and internally developed technology. The fair value was determined by applying an estimated royalty rate to revenues, measuring the value the Company would pay in royalties to a market participant if it did not own the trademark and internally developed technology and had to license it from a third party. The trademark was assigned a useful life of one and half years and the internally developed technology was assigned a useful life of one year.

When determining fair value of customer relationships, a form of income approach, known as the multi period excess earnings method was used. The fair value was determined by calculating the present value of estimated future operating cash flows generated from the existing customers less costs to realize the revenue. The Company applied a discount rate of 23%, which reflected the nature of the assets as they relate to the risk and uncertainty of the estimated future operating cash flows. Other significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the customer contracts include an assumed income tax rate of 25%. The assigned useful life for customer relationships was approximately six years.

The Company used a discounted cash flow model when determining the fair value of the non-compete agreements, significant assumptions include a discount rate of 20% and an assumed income tax rate of 26%. The non-compete agreements were assigned a useful life of two years.

The Company used a Monte-Carlo based simulation model when determining the fair value of the contingent consideration. The model takes into account the Company’s projections as well as an assumed discount rate of 12%.

The fair value of working capital accounts were determined to be the carrying values due to the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.

The fair value of property and equipment was estimated by applying the cost approach. The cost approach uses the replacement or reproduction cost as an indicator of fair value. The assumptions of the cost approach include replacement cost new, projected capital expenditures, and physical deterioration factors including economic useful life, remaining useful life, age, and effective age.

F-29

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

ELECTRIC BLUE LIMITED – CONTINUED

Changes in the balance of identified intangible assets and goodwill reflected on the balance sheet are the result of the impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the results of operations of EB from April 22, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and do not include results of operations for periods prior to April 22, 2022. The results of operations of EB from April 22, 2022 to December 31, 2022 included revenues of $4,601 and a net loss of $4,355.

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 as if the acquisition of EB had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2021. The pro forma information provided below is compiled from the pre-acquisition financial information of EB and includes pro forma adjustments for adjustments to certain expenses. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of (i) the results of operations that would have occurred had the operations of this acquisition actually been acquired at the beginning of fiscal year 2021 or (ii) future results of operations:

SCHEDULE OF PROFORMA INFORMATION OF OPERATIONS

         
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2022  2021 
  (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Revenues $62,002  $25,076 
Net loss $(92,705) $(60,076)

The above pro forma information includes pro forma adjustments to give effect to the amortization of the acquired intangible assets to the 2021 historical period. As of the date of the acquisition, the Company expected to collect all contractual cash flows related to receivables acquired in the acquisition.

Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and are recorded within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Acquisition-related costs were $376 during the year ended December 31, 2022.

See Note 9 – Fair Value Measurement for additional information.

F-30

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

BLUE CORNER NV

On May 10, 2021, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement dated April 21, 2021, the Company through its wholly-owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V. closed on the acquisition from the shareholders of Blue Corner NV, a Belgian company (“Blue Corner”), of all of the outstanding capital stock of Blue Corner. Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe. The acquisition of Blue Corner was made to enter the European market and provide an opportunity to expand the Company’s footprint in this region. The purchase price for the acquisition of all of Blue Corner’s outstanding capital stock was approximately $23,775 (or 20,000), consisting of approximately $22,985 (or 19,000) in cash and approximately $790 (700) represented by 32,382 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Consideration Shares”). The fair value of the Consideration Shares was calculated based on the average price of the Company’s common stock during the 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date of the Share Purchase Agreement, which equaled $37.66 (or 30.88) per share, reduced by a discount for illiquidity due to the 12-month lockup that exists on any sales or transfers. The Company executed management agreements with key Blue Corner personnel, including equity incentive packages consisting of additional shares of the Company’s common stock which is compensatory and not included in the purchase price for this acquisition. The Company entered into an escrow agreement pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, under which the Company paid approximately $2,100 (1,725) of the purchase price into an escrow account for a period of up to 18 months following the closing to cover any losses or damages the Company may incur by reason of any misrepresentation or breach of warranty by Blue Corner under the Share Purchase Agreement.

In order to determine the fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Blue Corner, the Company engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist to assist in the determination of fair values. The price purchase price allocation was finalized during fiscal 2022 within the one-year measurement period.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of Blue Corner:

SCHEDULE OF ASSETS ACQUIRED AND LIABILITIES ASSUMED

Purchase price allocation

Purchase Consideration:   
Cash $22,985 
Common stock  790 
     
Total Purchase Consideration $23,775 
     
Less:    
     
Fixed assets  1,322 
Trade name  343 
Customer relationships  1,800 
Favorable leases  292 
Internally developed technology  1,233 
Non-compete agreements  148 
Other liabilities  (144)
Other assets  283 
Debt-free net working capital deficit  (529)
     
Fair Value of Identified Net Assets  4,748 
     
Remaining Unidentified Goodwill Value $19,027 

F-31

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – CONTINUED

BLUE CORNER NV - CONTINUED

Changes in the balance of identified intangible assets and goodwill reflected on the balance sheet are the result of the impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates.

The components of debt free net working capital are as follows:

Current assets:   
Cash $245 
Accounts receivable  1,927 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  372 
Inventory  1,359 
     
Total current assets  3,903 
     
Less current liabilities:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  4,131 
Deferred revenue  301 
     
Total current liabilities  4,432 
     
Debt free net working capital deficit $(529)

 

Goodwill was recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired and the amount is attributable to the reputation of the business acquired, the workforce in place and the synergies to be achieved from this acquisition. Goodwill of $19,027 from the acquisition of Blue Corner is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the results of operations from Blue Corner as of May 10, 2021 to December 31, 2021 and do not include results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The results of operations of Blue Corner from May 10, 2021 to December 31, 2021 included revenues of $7,553 and a net loss of $2,567.

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 as if the acquisition of Blue Corner had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2020. The pro forma information provided below is compiled from the pre-acquisition financial information of Blue Corner and includes pro forma adjustments for interest expense and adjustments to certain expenses. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of (i) the results of operations that would have occurred had the operations of this acquisition actually been acquired at the beginning of fiscal year 2020 or (ii) future results of operations:

SCHEDULE OF PROFORMA INFORMATION OF OPERATIONS

  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2021  2020 
  (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Revenues $23,882  $10,771 
Net loss $(55,942) $(20,255)

The above pro forma information includes pro forma adjustments to remove the effect of interest expense recognized in the results of operations of Blue Corner during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 of $276 and $579, respectively.

F-32

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

4.PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

  2023  2022 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022 
EV charging stations $32,140  $22,718 
Building  6,847   4,718 
Software  2,455   2,137 
Automobiles  3,339   2,993 
Office and computer equipment  2,503   1,371 
Leasehold improvements  986   536 
Machinery and equipment  1,065   712 
Property and equipment, gross  49,335   35,185 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (14,208)  (9,323)
Property and equipment, net $35,127  $25,862 

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $4,885, $5,432 and $1,904 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, of which, $4,250, $3,113 and $1,531, respectively, was recorded within cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company disposed of property and equipment with a net book value of $2,731, $463 and $798 which resulted in a gain (loss) on disposal of $11, ($113) and ($156), respectively, which was included within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, the Company transferred charging stations of $1,786, $5,283 and $2,189 from inventory into property and equipment.

On January 22, 2021, the Company completed its purchase of approximately 10,000 square feet of office condominium space which became the Company’s corporate headquarters. The purchase price was $4,000, of which, $600 was paid in the form of the Company’s common stock (13,123 shares) and $3,400 in cash.

See Note 3 - Business Combination for additional details of the acquisition of property and equipment.

Changes in the balance of property and equipment reflected on the balance sheet are the result of the impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates.

F-33

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

5.INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

SCHEDULE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS

                                     
  

Internal

Use

Software

  

Capitalized

Engineering

Costs

  

Trade Name and

Patents

  

Customer

Relationships

  

Favorable

Leases

  

Internally

Developed

Technology

  

Non-Compete

Agreements

  

Accumulated

Amortization

  Total 
Balance as of January 1, 2022 $600  $237  $340  $1,677  $272  $1,148  $139  $(958) $3,455 
Additions  523   -   2,331   19,911   -   4,122   2,233   -   29,120 
Foreign currency translation  -   -   88   (190)  (15)  (239)  (119)  -   (475)
Amortization expense  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (5,518)  (5,518)
Balance as of December 31, 2022  1,123   237   2,759   21,398   257   5,031   2,253   (6,476)  26,582 
Intangible assets beginning balance  1,123   237   2,759   21,398   257   5,031   2,253   (6,476)  26,582 
Additions  122   1,028   166   1,925   -   175   11   -   3,426 
Impairment of intangible assets  -   -   (13)  (4,401)  -   (218)  (507)  -   (5,139)
Foreign currency translation  -   -   (107)  (698)  -   (184)  (27)  -   (1,016)
Amortization expense  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (7,556)  (7,556)
Balance as of December 31, 2023 $1,245  $1,265  $2,805  $18,224  $257  $4,804  $1,730  $(14,032) $16,298 
Intangible assets ending balance $1,245  $1,265  $2,805  $18,224  $257  $4,804  $1,730  $(14,032) $16,298 
Weighted average remaining amortization period at December 31, 2023 (in years)  0.8              0.0   0.0   3.9   0.0   0.2   0.0         
                                     
Useful Lives  3 Years   Indefinite   1.5 Years   5.6 Years   1.6 Years   3 Years   2 Years         

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION

                                 
  

Internal

Use

Software

  

Capitalized

Engineering

Costs

  

Trade Name

and

Patents

  

Customer

Relationships

  

Favorable

Leases

  

Internally

Developed

Technology

  

Non-Compete

Agreements

  

Accumulated

Amortization

 
Balance as of January 1, 2022 $207  $-  $155  $198  $109  $245  $44  $958 
Foreign currency translation  -             -   (65)  (250)  (6)  (100)  (15)  (436)
Amortization expense  294   -   896   2,547   154   1,254   809   5,954 
Balance as of December 31, 2022  501   -   986   2,495   257   1,399   838   6,476 
Intangible assets excluding goodwill beginning balance  501   -   986   2,495   257   1,399   838   6,476 
Amortization expense  220   -   1,106   4,097   -   1,330   803   7,556 
Balance as of December 31, 2023 $721  $-  $2,092  $6,592  $257  $2,729  $1,641  $14,032 
Intangible assets excluding goodwill ending balance $721  $-  $2,092  $6,592  $257  $2,729  $1,641  $14,032 

Amortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 were $7,556, $5,954, and $938, respectively.

The Company determined that the carrying value of certain intangible assets had exceeded its undiscounted cash flows and, as a result, recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $5,143 in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Changes in the balance of intangible assets and goodwill reflected on the consolidated balance sheet are the result of the impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates.

See Note 3 - Business Combination and Note 6 - Goodwill for additional details.

The estimated future amortization expense is as follows:

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED FUTURE AMORTIZATION EXPENSE

    
For the Years Ending December 31, Total 
2024 $5,697 
2025  4,145 
2026  3,378 
2027  

1,813

 
Thereafter  1,265 
Finite-lived intangible assets, net $16,298 

F-34

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

6.GOODWILL

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company considered the decline in its stock price to be an indicator of impairment and, accordingly, performed a quantitative impairment assessment of its goodwill and intangible assets. This assessment involved comparing the estimated fair value of each of its reporting units to the reporting unit’s carrying value, inclusive of the goodwill balance allocated to the reporting unit.

Estimation of the fair value of each reporting unit involved the projection of discounted future cash flows using certain assumptions that are subjective in nature, including assumptions related to historical and market growth rates and gross margin improvements, as well as future operating expense synergies and optimization, among other factors. Based on its analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value exceeded the estimated fair value as of December 31, 2023 in all reporting units. Consequently, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $89,087 in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2023.

The fair value measurements used in the evaluation described above are considered to be Level 3 valuations within the fair value hierarchy, as the measurements involve projections of discounted future cash flows, which are derived from unobservable assumptions, the most subjective of which are the discount rates for each respective reporting unit. The discount rate used in for all reporting units ranged from 20% to 22.5%.

Changes in goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:

SCHEDULE OF GOODWILL

  2023  2022 
       
Beginning balance January 1, $203,710  $19,390 
Acquisition of Electric Blue  -   10,443 
Acquisition of SemaConnect  -   174,439 
Acquisition of Envoy  30,118   - 
Acquisition  30,118   - 
Impairment of goodwill  (89,087)  - 
Effect of translation adjustments  140   (562)
Ending balance December 31, $144,881  $203,710 

F-35

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

7.NOTES PAYABLE

SEMACONNECT- NOTES PAYABLE

Amendment to Merger Agreement

On August 4, 2023, the Company, SemaConnect LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiary, and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, on behalf of the former stockholders of SemaConnect, Inc. (the “Stockholders’ Representative”), entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the original Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 13, 2022 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired SemaConnect.

Under the terms of the Amendment, the parties modified the manner by which the “Deferred Merger Consideration” (which remains $40,600, plus accrued interest) will be paid by the Company. As amended, the Company agreed to pay: (a) within 15 days following our consummation of a financing transaction or series of related transactions in excess of $150,000 since the June 2022 closing of the Merger Agreement, $12,500 of the outstanding Deferred Merger Consideration in cash to the former stockholders of SemaConnect (the “Stockholders”), and (b) within 15 days following our consummation of any financing transaction or series of related transactions in excess of $250,000 since the closing of the Merger Agreement, fifty cents of every dollar of proceeds received by the Company in excess of $250,000 to repay the Deferred Merger Consideration until all Deferred Merger Consideration is paid in full to the Stockholders. The Company agreed that its payment obligations will be guaranteed by all of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and secured by a security interest on all assets of the Company and its United States subsidiaries. The Company also agreed that such obligations will be due and payable by April 1, 2025, shortening the original due date from June 13, 2025.

Each Stockholder will have the right to convert its outstanding Deferred Merger Consideration (after the initial payment of $12,500, including accrued interest) into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 126% of the seven-day average prior to the date of the Amendment, provided that under no circumstance will the Company be obligated to issue such number of shares equal to or in excess of 20% of the Company’s common stock to the Stockholders, taking into account all common stock previously issued to such holders in the transaction. Under the Amendment, interest on the Deferred Merger Consideration was increased from 7% to 9.5% per annum following the date of the Amendment until full repayment of Deferred Merger Consideration. One half of the accrued interest may be paid in cash and the other half may be paid in-kind.

In consideration of the agreement by the Stockholders to enter into the Amendment, the Company agreed to issue 158,372 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $1,000 (“Consent Fee”) (based on the average closing price on and over the three days before and after the date of the Amendment) to the Stockholders’ Representative. The Company also agreed to reimburse up to $50 of the Stockholders’ Representative’s out-of-pocket expenses. The Amendment was determined to be an extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC 470. As a result, the Consent Fee of $1,000 was accounted for as a loss on extinguishment of notes payable on the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2023. Furthermore, the Company will recognize up to $50 of reimbursable legal fees as a debt discount to the face of the note, which will be amortized through interest expense over the term of the note.

Repayment

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company made a payment of $12,500 of which $9,292 was principle and $3,208 was accrued interest.

Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company repaid the remaining balance of $31,308 due under this note.

PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company obtained forgiveness for its PPP Loans in the amount of $856and recorded a gain on settlement of debt on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.

F-36

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

7.NOTES PAYABLE – CONTINUED

OTHER NOTES PAYABLE

In connection with the SemaConnect and EB acquisitions, the Company had also assumed certain notes payable; however, $681 of principal were subsequently repaid during the year ended December 31, 2022. See Note 3 – Business Combination for details.

In connection with the Envoy acquisition, the Company issued notes payable as part of the merger consideration. See Note 3 – Business Combination for details.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had an outstanding note payable in the principal amount of $10.

8.DEFERRED REVENUE

The Company is the recipient of various private and governmental grants, rebates and marketing incentives. Reimbursements of periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related expense is incurred. Private and government grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the recognition of the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives.

Deferred revenue consisted of the following:

SCHEDULE OF DEFERRED REVENUE

  2023  2022 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Grant and other $346  $6,516 
Prepaid network, charging and maintenance fees  25,729   9,314 
Total deferred revenue  26,075   15,830 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion  (12,462  (5,258)
Current portion of deferred revenue $13,613  $10,572 

It is anticipated that deferred revenue as of December 31, 2023 will be recognized as follows:

SCHEDULE OF DEFERRED REVENUE RECOGNIZED

     

For the Year Ending

December 31,

 Revenue 
2024 $13,613 
2025  4,477 
2026  3,849 
2027  2,995 
2028  905 
Thereafter  236 
Total $26,075 

F-37

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

9.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Assumptions utilized in the valuation of Level 3 liabilities are described as follows:

SUMMARY OF ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR VALUATION OF FAIR VALUE LIABILITIES

  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Risk-free interest rate  4.64%-5.46%  1.63%-4.73%  0.07%-0.39%
Contractual term (years)  1.00   1.00   1.00 
Expected volatility  67%-80%  74%-85%  90%-148%
Expected dividend yield  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 warrant liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN FAIR VALUE OF LEVEL 3 WARRANT LIABILITIES MEASURED AT RECURRING BASIS

  2023  2022 
Contingent Consideration        
Beginning balance as of January 1, $1,316  $- 
Contingent consideration assumed in EB acquisition  -   3,814 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (1,316)  (2,498)
Ending balance as of December 31, $-  $1,316 
         
Warrant Liability        
Beginning balance as of January 1 $24  $90 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  8   (66)
Ending balance as of December 31, $32  $24 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

SUMMARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE RECURRING AND NONRECURRING BASIS

  December 31, 2023 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Assets:            
Alternative fuel credits $-  $32  $-  $32 
Total assets $-  $32  $-  $32 
                 
Liabilities:                
Option liability $293  $-  $-  $293 
Contingent consideration  -   -   1,316   1,316 
Warrant liability  -   -   32  32 
Common stock liability  743   -   -   743 
Common stock consideration payable  18,118   -   -   18,118 
Total liabilities $19,154  $-  $32  $19,186 

  December 31, 2022 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Assets:            
Alternative fuel credits $-  $32  $-  $32 
Total assets $-  $32  $-  $32 
                 
Liabilities:                
Option liability $409  $-  $-  $409 
Contingent consideration  -   -   1,316   1,316 
Warrant liability  -   -   24   24 
Total liabilities $409  $-  $1,340  $1,749 

See Note 3 - Business Combinations for additional details.

In addition to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we also measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Our non-financial assets, including goodwill, intangible assets, operating lease right of use assets, and property, plant and equipment, are measured at fair value when there is an indication of impairment and the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s projected undiscounted cash flows. These assets are recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized.

F-38

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AUTHORIZED CAPITAL

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, and 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote per share. The preferred stock is designated as follows: 20,000,000 shares to Series A Convertible Preferred Stock; 10,000 shares to Series B Convertible Preferred Stock; 250,000 shares to Series C Convertible Preferred Stock; 13 shares to Series D Convertible Preferred Stock; and 19,727 shares undesignated.

OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLANS

On September 7, 2018, the Board of the Company, as well as a majority of the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which enables the Company to grant stock options, restricted stock, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance share awards, and other incentive awards to associates, directors, consultants, and advisors of the Company and its affiliates, and to improve the ability of the Company to attract, retain, and motivate individuals upon whom the Company’s sustained growth and financial success depend, by providing such persons with an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Company. Stock options granted under the 2018 Plan may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that stock options granted to outside directors and any consultants or advisers providing services to the Company or an affiliate shall in all cases be non-qualified stock options. The option price must be at least 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant and if issued to a 10% or greater shareholder must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of the grant. The 2018 Plan is to be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which shall have discretion over the awards and grants thereunder.

The aggregate maximum number of shares of common stock for which stock options or awards may be granted pursuant to the 2018 Plan is 5,000,000, adjusted as provided in Section 4 of the 2018 Plan. No awards may be issued on or after September 7, 2028.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, options to purchase 936,245 and 1,060,535 shares of options were outstanding, respectively. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 3,619,555 and 2,230,755 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding to employees and members of the Board of Directors of the Company. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were 2,756,384 and 2,769,245 securities available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan, respectively. 

PUBLIC OFFERING

In February 2023, the Company completed an underwritten registered public offering of 8,333,333 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $12.00 per share. The Company received approximately $100,000 in gross proceeds from the public offering and $94,766 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by the Company. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021, and prospectus supplement dated February 8, 2023. Barclays acted as the sole book-running manager for the offering. H.C. Wainwright & Co., Roth Capital Partners and ThinkEquity acted as co-managers for the offering. The underwriters did not exercise the over-allotment granted to them in connection with the offering.

In January 2021, the Company completed an underwritten registered public offering of 5,660,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $41.00 per share. The Company received $232,060 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and $221,406 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by the Company. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and one other officer participated in the offering by selling a total of 550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from the exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares. The public offering was made pursuant to the Company’s automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021 and prospectus supplement dated January 7, 2021.

F-39

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

AT-THE-MARKET OFFERING

On September 2, 2022, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., ThinkEquity LLC, H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (the “Agents”) to conduct an “ATM” equity offering program pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 through the Agents, as the Company’s sales agents. The Company currently anticipates using the net proceeds from the sale of its shares of common stock under the ATM program to supplement our operating cash flows to fund EV charging station deployment and growth plans. The Company also plans to use any remaining proceeds it receives for working capital and other corporate purposes. The amounts and timing of our use of the net proceeds will depend on a number of factors, such as the timing and progress of our EV charging station deployment efforts, the timing and progress of any partnering and collaboration efforts and technological advances.

On November 16, 2023, the Company entered into an Amendment to Sales Agreement, effective as of November 2, 2023 (the “Amendment”), with Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, Roth Capital Partners, LLC and ThinkEquity LLC (the “Agents”), amending the Sales Agreement entered into between the Company and the Agents, dated as of September 2, 2022 (the “Sales Agreement”), relating to the “at-the-market” offering program pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 through the Agents, as the Company’s sales agents.

The Amendment revises the term “Registration Statement” as used in the Sales Agreement to the Company’s new shelf registration statement on Form S-3, as amended (File No. 333-275123), and revises the term “Prospectus Supplement” as used in the Sales Agreement to the Company’s prospectus supplement dated November 2, 2023, relating to the “at-the-market” offering program contemplated by the Sales Agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company sold 30,914,695 shares of its common stock pursuant to the ATM program for gross proceeds of approximately $116,651 and net proceeds of approximately $114,317 after deducting offering expenses. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 8,177,472 shares of common stock aggregate gross proceeds of $25,651 and net proceeds of $25,136.

COMMON STOCK

2021

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 32,382 shares as partial consideration for its acquisition of Blue Corner.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 127,841 shares as compensation for services. The shares had an issuance date fair value of $3,950.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 13,123 shares as partial consideration for the purchase of property and equipment. See Note 4 – Property and Equipment for additional details.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 104,496 shares of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant and options exercises.

2022

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued an aggregate of 799,048 shares as compensation for services. The shares had an issuance date fair value of $6,087.

F-40

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

COMMON STOCK - CONTINUED

2023

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 557,733 shares of common stock pursuant to exercises of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 557,733 shares of common stock for aggregate net proceeds of $835.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,235 shares of common stock with an issuance date fair value of $35 in satisfaction of a common stock liability.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 393,240 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise of 796,940 options and warrants. The options had a weighted average exercise price of $3.35 per share and the warrants had a weighted average exercise price of $4.25 per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company received 27,681 shares of common stock with a value of $197 which were surrendered by the recipients for payroll tax purposes. These shares were surrendered and cancelled as of December 31, 2023.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 370,899 shares of common stock with an issuance date fair value of $2,600 in satisfaction of accrued issuable equity to its former Chief Executive Officer. See Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies – Separation Agreement for additional details.

See Note 5 – Notes Payable for details of the issuance of 158,372 shares of common stock in connection with the extinguishment of notes payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,866 shares of common stock for services to a board member with an issuance date fair value of $132.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 103,843 shares of common stock with an issuance date fair value of $128 as compensation to employees and its former Chief Executive Officer.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 376,778 shares of common stock for services to employees with an aggregate issuance date fair value of $3,104.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued an aggregate of 146,475 shares of common stock for services to an employee with an issuance date fair value of $334.

F-41

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to common stock, stock options and warrants for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 of $22,039, $15,913, and $19,108, respectively, which is included within compensation expense on the consolidated statement of operations. As December 31, 2023, there was $4,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that will be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 1.44 years.

On July 29, 2022, Michael D. Farkas, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and other senior executives of the Company who are responsible for the acquisition and integration of SemaConnect were granted one-time performance-based restricted stock awards under the Company’s 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan. A total number of 590,458 shares of common stock, with a market value on the grant date of $12,000, were awarded to the executives. The agreements provide that Messrs. Farkas, Brendan S. Jones, President, Michael P. Rama, Chief Financial Officer, Aviv Hillo, General Counsel, and Harjinder Bhade, Chief Technology Officer, will each receive 472,367, 47,237, 23,618, 23,618 and 23,618 shares of common stock, respectively. The awards of performance-based restricted stock are intended to provide an appropriate incentive structure for the executive management team of the Company to integrate and commercialize the SemaConnect acquisition given the transformational nature of the acquisition in a way that is aligned with stockholder interests. The awards of these performance-based restricted stock become vested based on a series of six performance hurdles that must be achieved before the third anniversary of the grants, as described in greater detail below. In addition to the closing of the SemaConnect acquisition with certain cost savings as the initial 20% vesting event, the vesting of the remaining 80% of the restricted stock is generally determined based on the (i) integration of SemaConnect’ s hardware and software platforms, (ii) integration of its business processes, (iii) integration of its human capital processes, (iv) delivery and execution of a product rationalization roadmap and new production ready units for UL certification, and (v) our common stock’s closing price reaching on average for a period of ten consecutive trading days a price of $23.78, which is 50% over the price paid by us to SemaConnect shareholders in the acquisition, in each case without regard to the order of achieving the foregoing hurdles. The Board has discretion to determine when each performance hurdle has been achieved and to accelerate awards pursuant to the program. As of December 31, 2022, the vesting performance hurdles related to the closing of the SemaConnect acquisition and clause (v) outlined above was met.

WARRANT AND OPTION VALUATION

The Company has computed the fair value of certain warrants and options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Option forfeitures are reduction of previous expensed amount at the time of occurrence. The expected term used for options issued is the estimated period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company utilizes the “simplified” method to develop an estimate of the expected term of “plain vanilla” employee option grants. The Company is utilizing an expected volatility figure based on a review of the historical volatility of the Company over a period equivalent to the expected life of the instrument being valued. The risk-free interest rate was determined from the implied yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining term consistent with the expected term of the instrument being valued.

F-42

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

STOCK OPTIONS

In applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model to options granted, the Company used the following assumptions: 

SUMMARY OF BLACK-SCHOLES OPTION PRICING MODEL TO STOCK OPTIONS GRANTED ASSUMPTION 

  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
          
Risk free interest rate  3.00%-4.14%   2.47%-3.25%   0.09%-1.539% 
Expected term (years)  5.00    1.00-8.00   1.00-8.00 
Expected volatility   115.9%-117.3    115%-133.4%   115.3%-140.7% 
Expected dividends  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 38,496 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise of options.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 136,500 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to an option exercise for aggregate net proceeds of $307.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,955 shares of common stock pursuant to option exercises for aggregate net proceeds of $10.

See Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies – CEO Employment Agreement for details associated with options granted to the Company’s CEO.

A summary of the option activity during the year ended December 31, 2023 is presented below: 

SUMMARY OF OPTIONS ACTIVITY

        Weighted    
     Weighted  Average    
     Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Number of  Exercise  Life  Intrinsic 
  Shares  Price  In Years  Value 
Outstanding, January 1, 2023  1,060,535  $24.68         
Granted  30,000   18.80         
Exercised  (123,850)  1.99         
Cancelled/forfeited/expired  (30,440)  19.67         
Outstanding, December 31, 2023  936,245  $24.68   2.7  $253 
                 
Exercisable, December 31, 2023  823,954  $27.89   2.0  $253 

F-43

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

STOCK OPTIONS – CONTINUED

The following table presents information related to stock options at December 31, 2023:

SCHEDULE OF STOCK OPTIONS

  Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
  Weighted     Weighted    
Range of Average  Outstanding  Average  Exercisable 
Exercise Exercise  Number of  Remaining Life  Number of 
Price Price  Options  In Years  Options 
$1.73-$9.14  2.18   206,571   0.7   206,571 
$15.51-$38.45  34.19   689,142   1.2   587,351 
$40.82-$59.22  46.50   40,532   0.1   30,032 
       936,245   2.0   823,954 

STOCK WARRANTS

Note 9– Fair Value Measurement and elsewhere within this note for additional details.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 388,101 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $4.25 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,619.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 66,000 shares of the Company’s common stock representing a modification of the initial warrant exercise pursuant to a legal settlement. See Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation and Disputes for details.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,093 shares of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises (of which, warrants to purchase 9,600 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $3.40 per share were exercised) and an aggregate of 73,336 shares of common stock pursuant to warrant exercises for aggregate net proceeds of $210.

In applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model to warrants granted, the Company used the following assumptions:

SUMMARY OF BLACK-SCHOLES OPTION PRICING MODEL TO WARRANTS GRANTED ASSUMPTION

  For the Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
          
Risk free interest rate  3.39%-4.03%  N/A   N/A 
Expected term (years)  5.00   N/A   N/A 
Expected volatility  115.9%-133.4%  N/A   N/A 
Expected dividends  0.00%  N/A   N/A 

The following table accounts for the Company’s warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2023:

SCHEDULE OF WARRANT ACTIVITY

        Weighted    
     Weighted  Average    
     Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Number of  Exercise  Life  Intrinsic 
  Shares  Price  In Years  Value 
Outstanding, January 1, 2023  1,587,965  $4.25         
Issued  1,145,914   9.69         
Exercised  (1,587,965)  4.25         
Outstanding, December 31, 2023  1,145,914  $4.25   4.2  $- 
                 
Exercisable, December 31, 2023  1,145,914  $4.25   4.2  $- 

F-44

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

10.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

STOCK WARRANTS – CONTINUED

The following table presents information related to stock warrants at December 31, 2023:

SCHEDULE OF STOCK WARRANTS

  Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable 
  Weighted     Weighted    
Range of Average  Outstanding  Average  Exercisable 
Exercise Exercise  Number of  Remaining Life  Number of 
Price Price  Warrants  In Years  Warrants 
                 
$8.82-$11.56 $9.69   1,145,914   4.2   1,145,914 
       1,145,914   4.2   1,145,914 



11.INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to U.S. federal and various state income taxes.

The income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 consisted of the following:

SCHEDULE OF INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)

  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Federal:            
Current $-  $-  $- 
Deferred $(7,129) 

$

(22,605) 

$

(5,691)
             
State:            
Current $-  

$

-  $- 
Deferred $426  $(1,430) 

$

(1,348)
             
Foreign:            
Current 

$

1,493  

$

317  

$

- 
Deferred 

$

(7,995) $(4,120) 

$

- 
  

$

(13,205) 

$

(27,837) 

$

(7,039)
Change in valuation allowance $14,699  

$

28,145  

$

7,039 
Income tax provision (benefit) $

1,494

  $308  $- 

No federal or state current tax provision has been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 because the Company had net operating losses for federal and state tax purposes. However, a foreign tax provision was recorded related to the Company’s operations in India. The net operating loss carryovers may be subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, and similar state provisions, should there be a greater than 50% ownership change as determined under the applicable income tax regulations. The amount of the limitation would be determined based on the value of the company immediately prior to the ownership change and subsequent ownership changes could further impact the amount of the annual limitation. An ownership change pursuant to Section 382 may have occurred in the past or could happen in the future, such that the NOLs available for utilization could be significantly limited. The Company will perform a Section 382 analysis in the future. The related decrease in the deferred tax asset will be offset by the decrease in valuation allowance.

F-45

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

11.INCOME TAXES – CONTINUED

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

SUMMARY OF RECONCILIATION OF STATUTORY FEDERAL INCOME TAX RATE AND EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE

             
  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate  (21.0)%  (21.0)%  (21.0)%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit  0.2%  (1.3)%  (2.4)%
Permanent differences:            
Stock Compensation  1.5%  0.6%  0.2%
Loss on Impairment of Intangibles and Goodwill  9.8%  0.0%  0.0%
Section 162(m)  1.9%  1.7%  8.3%
Other Permanent Differences  

0.2

%  0.7%  (0.3)%
Tax credits  0.0%  0.0%  (0.1)%
Income from non-includable foreign entities  

1.8

%  4.3%  1.6%
Prior year differences  2.3%  (11.2)%  1.0%
Change in valuation allowance  

7.3

%  30.8%  12.8%
Foreign tax  

(3.2

)%  (4.2)%  0.0%
Effective income tax rate  0.7%  0.3%  0.0%

The Company has determined that a valuation allowance for the entire net deferred tax asset is required. A valuation allowance is required if, based on the weight of evidence, it is more likely than not that some or the entire portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that a full valuation allowance is necessary to reduce the deferred tax asset to zero, the amount that will more likely not be realized.

The disaggregation of the Company’s domestic and foreign pre-tax loss for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 is as follows:

SCHEDULE OF DISAGGREGATION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PRE-TAX LOSS

             
  For the Year Ended December 31 
  2023  2022  2021 
U.S. $(151,883) $(76,528) $(50,803)
Foreign  (50,315)  (14,724)  (4,316)
Total $(202,199) $(91,252) $(55,119)

F-46

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

11.INCOME TAXES – CONTINUED

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented below:

SCHEDULE OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

         
  December 31 
  2023  2022 
Deferred Tax Assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards-federal $64,076  $51,722 
Net operating loss carryforwards-states  

9,837

   8,392 
Net operating loss carryforwards-UK  

4,759

   2,584 
Net operating loss carryforwards-Belgium  

8,454

   3,022 
Tax credits  

656

   626 
Stock-based compensation  1,542   5,137 
Accruals  

513

   1,425 
Deferred revenue  

2,052

   441 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  

1,180

   441 
Goodwill  

714

   712 
Capitalized Sec.174 R&E  

1,154

   297 
Other  

633

   522 
Deferred tax assets, gross  

95,569

   75,321 
Deferred Tax Liabilities:        
Intangible Assets  (3,743)  (5,791)
Fixed Assets  

(2,226

)  (488)
Unrealized Gain/Loss  (80)  (134)
Deferred Tax assets reserves  -   (370)
Other  (81)   (123)
Deferred tax liabilities, gross  (6,129)  (6,905)
         
Net deferred tax assets  89,440   68,416 
Valuation Allowance  (89,414)  (68,390)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance  26   27 
         
Change in valuation allowance $21,024  $33,122

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $305,125 of which, $86,636 may be used to offset future taxable income through 2037 and the remaining $218,489 of net operating loss carry forwards incurred after 2017, do not have an expiration date. In addition, state NOLs carryforwards available are approximately $212,571, as of December 31, 2023.The Company also has approximately $653 in business credits expiring between 2030 and 2043.

F-47

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

12.RELATED PARTIES

JOINT VENTURE

The Company and a group of three Cyprus entities entered into a shareholders’ agreement on February 11, 2019, pertaining to the parties’ respective shareholdings in a new joint venture entity, Blink Charging Europe Ltd. (the “Entity”), that was formed under the laws of Cyprus on the same date. The Company owns 40% of the Entity while the other three parties own 60% of the Entity. Subsequently, two of the three other parties exited the joint venture and the remaining other party acquired the ownership of the exiting parties. The Entity currently owns 100% of a Greek subsidiary, Blink Charging Hellas SA (“Hellas”), which operates in the electric vehicle market in Greece. The obligation to fund the future operations of the Entity is limited to the Company’s 40% ownership. The Company did not record sales to Hellas during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized sales of $811 to Hellas. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31,2022 the Company had a payable of approximately $114 and $84, respectively, to Hellas. In addition, the Company has provided working capital of $177 and $0 as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, in Hellas. The Company has written off this working capital contribution, since Company’s proportion of Hellas’s net losses exceed the working capital contribution.

The Company determined that the Entity is a variable interest entity; however, the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and, as a result, the Company is not required to consolidate the Entity and instead has applied equity method accounting to its investment in the Entity. From inception through December 31, 2023, the Entity has not generated net income and, as a result, pursuant to ASC 323, the Company has not recorded a gain or loss on its equity method investment in the Entity during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.

BLUE CORNER

As of December 31, 2021, the Company owed approximately $800 to this supplier. As of December 31, 2022, this related party relationship does not exist since, as of December 31, 2022, those senior management employees are no longer with Blue Corner. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company made purchases of $1,444 with these related parties.

BLINK CHARGING UK LIMITED

As of December 31, 2023, several close family members of a senior management employee are providing services to Electric Blue Limited. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, these related parties have collectively provided services worth $359 and $95 respectively, to Electric Blue Limited. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2023, there were purchase commitments of $198 to the same related parties.

F-48

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has defined-contribution plans for which employees meeting certain age and length of service requirements may contribute up to the defined statutory limit. These plans provide discretionary employer matching contributions to eligible employees up to certain statutory annual limits. Employer contributions to these plans was $652, $238 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

14.LEASES

OPERATING LEASES

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement for approximately 27,540 square feet of space in Arizona. The lease commenced on January 1, 2021 and will terminate on May 31, 2028. The lease includes a build-out allowance of $137. Monthly payments under the lease are $18 per month. The lease also includes a security deposit of $22.

Total operating lease expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 were $1,803, $789, and $566, respectively, and is recorded in other operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Operating lease expenses consist of rent expense, common area maintenance adjustments and other expenses.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $697 of right-of-use assets that were classified as financing leases for vehicles associated with the operations of Blink Mobility and are included as a component of property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023. The duration of the leases are three years and the Company is expected to pay approximately $1,020 throughout the term. As of December 31, 2023, the Company did not have additional operating and financing leases that have not yet commenced.

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded $37 and $38 of interest expense related to finance leases, respectively, which were recorded within interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded amortization expense of $1,226 and $659 related to finance leases, respectively. There were no finance leases as of December 31, 2021.

F-49

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

14.LEASES – CONTINUED

OPERATING LEASES – CONTINUED

Supplemental cash flows information related to leases was as follows:

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION RELATED TO LEASES

  2023  2022  2021 
  For The Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2023  2022  2021 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:         
          
Operating cash flows from operating leases $3,672  $825  $1,019 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: Operating cash flows from operating leases $3,672  $825  $1,019 
Financing cash flows from finance leases $2,837  $217  $- 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: Financing cash flows from finance leases $2,837  $217  $- 
             
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:            
Operating leases $7,401  $1,787  $2,129 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: Operating leases $7,401  $1,787  $2,129 
Finance leases $2,798  $931  $- 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: Finance leases $2,798  $931  $- 
             
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term            
Operating leases  2.74   3.66   4.77 
Finance leases  1.71   2.50   - 
             
Weighted Average Discount Rate            
Operating leases  7.5%  4.9%  4.7%
Finance leases  6.4%  6.2%  0.0%

Future minimum payments under non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 2023 were as follows: 

SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MINIMUM LEASE PAYMENTS

For the Years Ending December 31, Operating Lease  Finance Lease 
2024 $3,917  $580 
2025  3,031   115 
2026  1,814   30 
2027  1,121   26 
2028  703   15 
Thereafter  1,303   - 
Total future minimum lease payments  11,888   765 
Less: imputed interest  (1,415)  (90)
Total $10,473  $675 

F-50

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

15.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

PURCHASE COMMITMENTS

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had purchase commitments of approximately $21,672 which will become payable upon the suppliers’ delivery of the charging stations and other related items. The purchase commitments were made primarily for future sales, deployments of charging stations, inventory management planning and other related items, all of which are expected to be received during the next 12-24 months.

PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

On March 29, 2012, the Company, as licensee (the “Licensee”) entered into an exclusive patent license agreement with the Executive Chairman of the Board and Balance Holdings, LLC (an entity controlled by the Executive Chairman) (collectively, the “Licensor”), whereby the Company agreed to pay a royalty of 10% of the gross profits received by the Company from commercial sales and/or use of two provisional patent applications, one relating to an inductive charging parking bumper and one relating to a process which allows multiple EVs to plug into an EV charging station simultaneously and charge as the current becomes available.

On March 11, 2016, the Licensee and the Licensor entered into an agreement related to the March 29, 2012 patent license agreement. The parties acknowledged that the Licensee has paid a total of $9 in registration and legal fees for the U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61529016 (the “Patent Application”) (related to the inductive charging parking bumper) to date. Effective March 11, 2016, the patent license agreement, solely with respect to the Patent Application and the parties’ rights and obligations thereto, was terminated. The Executive Chairman of the Board agreed to be solely responsible for all future costs and fees associated with the prosecution of the patent application. In the event the Patent Application is successful, the Executive Chairman of the Board shall grant a credit to the Licensee in the amount of $9 to be applied against any outstanding amount(s) owed to him. If the Licensee does not have any outstanding payment obligations to the Executive Chairman of the Board at the time the Patent Application is approved, the Executive Chairman of the Board shall remit the $9 to the Licensee within twenty (20) days of the approval. The parties agreed to a mutual release of any claims associated with the patent license agreement. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has not paid nor incurred any royalty fees related to this patent license agreement.

LITIGATION, DISPUTES AND SETTLEMENTS

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, investigations, intellectual property matters, claims and proceedings, including, but not limited to, contractual disputes with vendors and customers and liabilities related to employment, health and safety matters that may arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. Loss contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex and subject to change.

The Company believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any such lawsuits, investigations, claims, and proceedings as of December 31, 2023, and the Company believes it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Given the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome of the ongoing matters described herein cannot be predicted with certainty. While litigation is inherently unpredictable, the Company believes it has valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending against it. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, may potentially have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting period.

F-51

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

15.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – CONTINUED

LITIGATION, DISPUTES AND SETTLEMENTS – CONTINUED

On August 24, 2020, a purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Bush v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23527, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Michael Farkas (Blink’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer), and Michael Rama (Blink’s Chief Financial Officer) (the “Bush Lawsuit”). On September 1, 2020, another purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Vittoria v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23643, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the same defendants and seeking to recover the same alleged damages (the “Vittoria Lawsuit”). On October 1, 2020, the court consolidated the Vittoria Lawsuit with the Bush Lawsuit and on December 21, 2020 the court appointed Tianyou Wu, Alexander Yu and H. Marc Joseph to serve as the Co-Lead Plaintiffs. The Co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on February 19, 2021. The Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants made false or misleading statements about the size and functionality of the Blink Network and asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Amended Complaint does not quantify damages but seeks to recover damages on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Blink’s common stock between March 6, 2020 and August 19, 2020. On April 20, 2021, Blink and the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, which has now been fully briefed and is ready for review. On April 7, 2022, the court held oral argument on the motion to dismiss but did not issue a decision. The Company wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel in order to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

On September 15, 2020, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Klein (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20- 19815CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against Blink’s Board of Directors and Michael Rama (the “Klein Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The Klein Lawsuit asserts that the Director defendants caused Blink to make the statements that are at issue in the securities class action and, as a result, the Company will incur costs defending against the consolidated Bush Lawsuit and other unidentified investigations. The Klein Lawsuit asserts claims against the Director defendants for breach of fiduciary duties and corporate waste and against all of the defendants for unjust enrichment. Klein did not quantify the alleged damages in his complaint, but he seeks damages sustained by the Company as a result of the defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties, corporate governance changes, restitution, and disgorgement of profits from the defendants and attorneys’ fees and other litigation expenses. The parties agreed to temporarily stay the Klein Lawsuit until there is a ruling on the motion to dismiss filed in the consolidated Bush Lawsuit. On June 17, 2022, the court substituted the executrix of Klein’s estate as the plaintiff. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

On December 23, 2020, another shareholder derivative action, captioned Bhatia (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20-27632CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court against the same defendants sued in the Klein Lawsuit and asserting similar claims, as well as additional claims relating to the Company’s nomination, appointment and hiring of minorities and women and the Company’s decision to retain its outside auditor (the “Bhatia Lawsuit”). On February 17, 2021, the parties agreed to consolidate the Klein and Bhatia actions, which the court consolidated under the caption In re Blink Charging Company Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2020-019815-CA-01. The parties also agreed to keep in place the temporary stay. The court subsequently vacated the consolidation order and explained the parties should first file a motion to transfer, which the parties have done. On June 22, 2022, the court re-consolidated the Klein and Bhatia actions and reinstated the temporary stay. The Company wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel in order to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

F-52

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

15.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – CONTINUED

LITIGATION, DISPUTES AND SETTLEMENTS – CONTINUED

On February 12, 2021, another shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Wolery (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Buffalino et al., Case No. A-21-829395-C, was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against Blink’s Board of Directors (the “Wolery Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The Wolery complaint alleges that the amount of restricted stock awarded to Blink’s outside directors in December 2020 exceeded the amounts permitted by Blink’s incentive compensation plan. The complaint asks the court to rescind the excess restricted stock awards, as well as other relief. On September 15, 2021, the parties entered into a term sheet in which they agreed to settle the claims subject to the court’s approval. On April 18, 2022, the court signed a final judgment approving the settlement and dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice. As a result of the settlement, the Company has agreed to make certain changes to its compensation practices for its directors and officers, including, among other things, eliminating the practice of making cash payments to directors to cover expected income taxes on stock grants and placing a $200 annual limit for two years on the combined stock and cash awards to outside directors. The defendants did not admit any liability or wrongdoing in the settlement and will not make any cash payment as part of the settlement, but the Company will be responsible for paying the costs to give notice of the settlement to the Company’s shareholders and to pay $190 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiff’s counsel which was paid in April 2022.

On February 7, 2022, another shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned McCauley (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. A-22-847894-C, was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada, seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against six of Blink’s directors and Michael Rama (the “McCauley Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint filed in the McCauley Lawsuit asserts similar allegations to the Klein Lawsuit relating to the statements at issue in the securities class action and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The McCauley Lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief from the individual defendants, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On March 29, 2022, the Nevada court approved the parties’ stipulation to temporarily stay the McCauley Lawsuit until there is a ruling on the motion to dismiss filed in the consolidated Bush Lawsuit. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2023 as it determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.

F-53

BLINK CHARGING CO.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

15.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – CONTINUED

WARRANTY

The Company estimates an approximate cost of $600 to repair deployed chargers, which the Company owns as of December 31, 2023.

SEPARATION AGREEMENT

On June 21, 2023, the Company and its former Chief Executive Officer Michael D. Farkas entered into a separation and general release agreement, dated as of June 20, 2023 (the “Separation Agreement”) pursuant to Mr. Farkas’ May 1, 2023 termination of employment and the terms of Mr. Farkas’ employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”). The Separation Agreement became effective on June 28, 2023, following a statutory revocation period. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to provide Mr. Farkas with (i) $6,028 in cash compensation, (ii) 383,738 shares of the Company’s common stock and (iii) reimbursement for medical benefits under COBRA for 24 months or until Mr. Farkas becomes eligible for coverage under another employer’s group plan. In addition, Mr. Farkas’ outstanding issued and unvested equity awards became vested and, as a result, the Company recognized approximately $2,900 of stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2023 related to the accelerated awards. In return, Mr. Farkas agreed that he has received all compensation to which he is entitled with respect to his employment or termination thereof (except for any obligations under the parties’ Commission Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2009) and Mr. Farkas released the Company from all claims that he might have related to his employment. Further, Mr. Farkas acknowledged that the terms of his non-competition and non-solicitation covenants under his Employment Agreement remain in effect, except that Mr. Farkas will be permitted to continue to work with certain individuals with whom he has a current relationship outside of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued 383,738 shares of common stock with an issuance date fair value of $2,900 to Mr. Farkas in connection with the Separation Agreement.

MATERIAL AGREEMENT

In October 2021, the Company negotiated and executed an amendment and extension to its agreement with a contract manufacturer of the Company. The amendment extends the term of the agreement for an additional five (5) years. Accordingly, the Company could potentially incur additional costs related to units ordered that were subsequently canceled or otherwise not fulfilled.

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

AT-THE-MARKET OFFERING

Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company sold an aggregate of 8,177,472 shares of common stock aggregate gross proceeds of $25,651 and net proceeds of $25,136.

F-54