UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10‑K/A
(Amendment No. 1)10-K
(MARK ONE)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001‑36842001-36842
NEXTDECADE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 46-5723951 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
|
| |
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 3900 |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 574-1880
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| |
| Trading Symbol: |
|
Common stock $0.0001 par value | NEXT | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Redeemable Warrants, each to purchase one Shareone share of Common StockCompany common stock
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically,, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑212b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer |
|
Non-accelerated filer |
| Smaller reporting company | ☒ |
| Emerging growth company |
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑212b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stockvoting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $137.1$66.7 million as of June 29, 2018.30, 2020 (based on the closing price of the registrant's common stock on June 30, 2020 of $2.16 per share).
110,035,774
122,174,938 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, were outstanding as of April 9, 2019.March 18, 2021.
Documents incorporated by reference: The definitive proxy statement for the registrant's Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant's fiscal year) is incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
Matthew K. Schatzman is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Schatzman was appointed President in September 2018 and became Chief Executive Officer in February 2018 as contemplated by the terms of his employment agreement with the Company dated September 8, 2017, as amended by that Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2019 (as amended, the “Schatzman Employment Agreement”). Please refer to the section titled “Identification of Directors” for additional information with respect to Mr. Schatzman’s background and experience.
Benjamin Atkins, CFA, CPA, is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and was appointed to such office in July 2017. Mr. Atkins has served as Chief Financial Officer of NextDecade since November 2015. Mr. Atkins is responsible for the Company’s capital strategy, project financing, financial reporting, controls, budgeting, information technology, investor relations, tax reporting/incentives and insurance. Before joining the Company, Mr. Atkins served as Senior Vice President at GE Capital, where he worked from November 2005 to October 2015, focusing on investment and portfolio management roles for thermal power and midstream equity investments. Mr. Atkins previously worked at McKinsey & Company and as a manager in State Street Corporation’s Securities Finance division. Mr. Atkins is a Chartered Financial Analyst and a licensed Certified Public Accountant in Connecticut and Texas. He was valedictorian of his class at the United States Naval Academy and served as a nuclear engineer in the United States Navy submarine fleet. He earned a Master of Arts degree in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics from Oxford University.
Krysta De Lima is the Company’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and was appointed to such offices in July 2017. Ms. De Lima has served as General Counsel of NextDecade since July 2015. Ms. De Lima is responsible for all of the Company’s legal and contractual matters. From October 2013 to June 2015, Ms. De Lima worked in Bechtel’s Oil, Gas and Chemicals business unit where she advised on major global engineering, procurement and construction contracts and transactions. Previously, from September 2001 to December 2012, Ms. De Lima served first as lead counsel, then as VP Legal and then as Chief of Staff of the Trinidad Asset within BG Group plc (“BG Group”) where she advised on upstream, midstream and downstream projects and investments, including on the development, commissioning and oversight of BG Group’s investments in all four operating LNG trains at Atlantic LNG in Trinidad. Prior to BG Group, Ms. De Lima worked in private practice at Arthur Andersen. Ms. De Lima holds a Bachelor of Laws from Kings College London and a DESS in European Law and Maîtrise in French Law from the Université of Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne. Ms. De Lima is qualified to practice law in New York, France, England, the British Virgin Islands and Trinidad and Tobago.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires Company directors, officers. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our future results of operations and persons owningfinancial position, strategy and plans, and our expectations for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “contemplate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “can have,” “likely,” “continue,” “design” and other words and terms of similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives and financial needs.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Our future financial position and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should consider our forward-looking statements in light of a number of factors that may cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements including, but not limited to:
• | our progress in the development of our liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) liquefaction and export projects and the timing of that progress; |
• | our final investment decision (“FID”) in the construction and operation of a LNG terminal at the Port of Brownsville in southern Texas (the “Terminal”) and the timing of that decision; |
• | the successful completion of the Terminal by third-party contractors and a pipeline to supply gas to the Terminal being developed by a third-party; |
• | our ability to secure additional debt and equity financing in the future to complete the Terminal; |
• | the accuracy of estimated costs for the Terminal; |
• | statements that the Terminal, when completed, will have certain characteristics, including amounts of liquefaction capacities; |
• | the development risks, operational hazards, regulatory approvals applicable to the Terminal’s and the third-party pipeline's construction and operations activities; |
• | our anticipated competitive advantage and technological innovation which may render our anticipated competitive advantage obsolete; |
• | the global demand for and price of natural gas (versus the price of imported LNG); |
• | the availability of LNG vessels worldwide; |
• | changes in legislation and regulations relating to the LNG industry, including environmental laws and regulations that impose significant compliance costs and liabilities; |
• | global pandemics, including the 2019 novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, and their impact on our business and operating results, including any disruptions in our operations or development of the Terminal and the health and safety of our employees, and on our customers, the global economy and the demand for LNG; |
• | risks related to doing business in and having counterparties in foreign countries; |
• | our ability to maintain the listing of our securities on a securities exchange or quotation medium; |
• | changes adversely affecting the business in which we are engage; |
• | management of growth; |
• | general economic conditions; |
• | our ability to generate cash; |
• | compliance with environmental laws and regulations; and |
• | the result of future financing efforts and applications for customary tax incentives. |
Should one or more than ten percent (10%) of Company equity securitiesthe foregoing risks or uncertainties materialize in a way that negatively impacts us, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements and, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. In addition, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we do not undertake any obligation to file reportspublicly correct or update any forward-looking statement.
Please read “Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of ownershipthe risks and changesuncertainties mentioned above and for a discussion of ownershipother risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements and hereafter in our other filings with the SEC. ToSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and public communications. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made by us in the context of these risks and uncertainties.
Our Formation
We were incorporated in Delaware on May 21, 2014 and were formed for the purpose of acquiring, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, one or more businesses or entities. On July 24, 2017, one of our knowledgesubsidiaries merged with and based solelyinto NextDecade LLC, a LNG development company founded in 2010 to develop LNG export projects and associated pipelines. Prior to the merger with NextDecade LLC, we had no operations and our assets consisted of cash proceeds received in connection with our initial public offering.
Our common stock trades on the Company’sNasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “NEXT.”
Our warrants issued in connection with our initial public offering in 2015 (the “IPO Warrants”) trade on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “NEXTW.”
Company Overview
Our management is comprised of a team of industry leaders with extensive experience in LNG marketing and project development. We have focused and continue to focus our development activities on the Terminal and have undertaken and continue to undertake various initiatives to evaluate, design and engineer the Terminal that we expect will result in demand for LNG supply at the Terminal, which would enable us to seek construction financing to develop the Terminal. We believe the Terminal possesses competitive advantages in several important areas, including engineering, design, commercial, regulatory and gas supply. We submitted a pre-filing request for the Terminal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “FERC”) in March 2015 and filed a formal application with the FERC in May 2016. We also believe we have robust commercial offtake and gas supply strategies.
On March 2, 2020, we completed the sale of Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC (“Rio Bravo”) to Spectra Energy Transmission II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge, Inc ("Enbridge"). Rio Bravo is developing a proposed interstate natural gas pipeline (the “Pipeline”) to supply natural gas to the Terminal. In connection with the sale of Rio Bravo, our indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Rio Grande LNG Gas Supply LLC (“Rio Grande Gas Supply”), entered into precedent agreements (the “Transportation Precedent Agreements”) with Rio Bravo and Valley Crossing Pipeline, LLC (“VCP”), pursuant to which Rio Grande Gas Supply will retain its rights to the natural gas firm transportation capacity on the Pipeline for a term of at least twenty years and Rio Bravo and VCP, will provide pipeline transportation service to Rio Grande Gas Supply in order to supply natural gas to the Terminal. As of March 2, 2020, VCP and Rio Bravo were wholly owned subsidiaries of Enbridge.
We believe that the Terminal, to be located on a 984-acre site in Brownsville, Texas, along with the Pipeline to connect the Terminal to the Agua Dulce supply area, is well-positioned among the second wave of United States (“U.S.”) LNG projects. It is located to take advantage of natural gas resources in Texas, including the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. We plan to construct, develop, own and operate the Terminal.
On November 22, 2019, the Terminal and the Pipeline received an order from the FERC (“the Order”) authorizing the siting, construction, and operation of six liquefaction trains, four LNG storage tanks (each with a capacity of 180,000 cubic meters), two marine jetties for ocean-going LNG vessels, one turning basin, and six truck loading bays for LNG and natural gas liquids and all associated facilities for the production of up to 27 million tonnes per annum (“mtpa”). Simultaneously, the FERC issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the construction of the Pipeline. On January 23, 2020, the FERC issued its final order on rehearing rejecting all challenges to the Order. While the Order authorizes six liquefaction trains, we may make a positive FID on as few as two liquefaction trains.
The original front-end engineering and design for the Terminal was based on six LNG trains capable of producing 27 mtpa of LNG for export. The technologies that were selected and filed with the FERC in 2015 and 2016 have evolved over the five-year permitting period; the individual LNG trains are now more efficient and will produce a greater volume of LNG with lower total carbon dioxide equivalent (“CO2e”) emissions. Multiple optimizations have been identified that will lead to the delivery of a LNG project capable of producing 27 mtpa with just five LNG trains instead of six.
We expect the optimization to a five-train project to result in several environmental and community benefits when compared with our original six-train project including (i) approximately 21 percent lower CO2e emissions, (ii) a shortened construction timeline for the full 27 mtpa project, (iii) reduced facility footprint, and (iv) an expected reduction in roadway traffic.
On August 13, 2020, the FERC approved the change of the design for the Terminal from six trains to five trains. On October 9, 2020, the FERC issued a notice of denial of rehearing for such approval in regards to challenges to its approval of the design change.
Any future development of Train 6 will require us to secure authorization from the FERC, the U.S. Department of Energy (the “DOE”), and any other relevant federal or state agency with jurisdiction over the export project.
In January 2021, we determined that the site in Texas City, Texas for our proposed second LNG facility (“Galveston Bay LNG”) is not suitable for a LNG facility and related infrastructure and utilities and, therefore, elected to forfeit such site. We have informed the FERC of our intent to withdraw Galveston Bay LNG from FERC pre-filing proceedings and cease all related activities. In March 2021, the DOE terminated its June 2018 authorization for export of LNG from Galveston Bay LNG.
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction
During the third quarter of 2018, we initiated a competitive engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) bid process. We received expressions of interest (the “EOIs”) from multiple EPC contractors to participate in the EPC process. We reviewed the EOIs against a series of selection criteria and issued formal invitations to bid to Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. (“Bechtel”), Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (“Fluor”) and McDermott International, Inc (“McDermott”). In December 2018, each of the EPC bidders provided us with an endorsement of the Terminal’s front-end engineering and design (“FEED”), which indicates the bidders’ confirmation that the Terminal is technically feasible and can be further designed, engineered, permitted, constructed, commissioned and safely placed into operations. On April 22, 2019, we received EPC bid packages from each of Bechtel and Fluor, two of the global LNG market’s leading EPC contractors. The technical and commercial bid packages, which were received on-schedule, were for fully wrapped lump-sum separated turnkey (“LSTK”) EPC contracts for the Terminal.
On May 24, 2019, Rio Grande entered into two LSTK EPC agreements with Bechtel for the construction of (i) two LNG trains with expected aggregate production capacity up to approximately 11.74 mtpa, two 180,000m3 full containment LNG tanks, one marine loading berth, related utilities and facilities, and all related appurtenances thereto, together with certain additional work options (the “Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement”) and (ii) an LNG train with expected production capacity of up to approximately 5.87 mtpa, related utilities and facilities, and all related appurtenances thereto (the “Train 3 EPC Agreement” and together with the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement, the “EPC Agreements”). During each of 2020 and 2019, we issued two limited notices to proceed to Bechtel under the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement.
In 2020, we developed proprietary carbon capture processes that, with the addition of storage technology, could reduce CO2e emissions at the Terminal by approximately 90 percent. While we are advancing our work in this area, we are also exploring options to address the remaining CO2e emissions to enable the Terminal to achieve carbon-neutrality.
Commercial
We are continuing commercial discussions with a variety of parties ranging from large utilities and state-sponsored enterprises to portfolio and multinational commodity interests. Leveraging the global relationships and extensive experience of our management team, we expect to sign long-term binding offtake commitments for substantially all of the Terminal’s capacity prior to a FID.
We believe the Terminal’s location will provide customers with access to low-cost natural gas from the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. We are focused on selling LNG to customers through a “free on board” (“FOB”) model whereby a marketing affiliate would acquire feed gas, the Terminal would produce the LNG and the title transfer would occur at the interface between the Terminal and the customer’s ship.
We offer multiple LNG pricing options, meeting the evolving needs of our customers and maximizing our total addressable market. Global LNG customers are expressing interest in contracting their LNG offtake to indexes other than Henry Hub. We are working with U.S. producers to provide alternative indexation, including netback pricing, to satisfy global LNG customers’ needs. LNG pricing options may include indexation to Brent Crude Oil, Agua Dulce hub, Waha hub, Japan Korea Marker and Title Transfer Facility, among others.
In March 2019, we entered into a 20-year sale and purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Shell NA LNG LLC (“Shell”) for the supply of two mtpa of liquefied natural gas from the Terminal. Pursuant to the SPA, Shell will purchase LNG on a FOB basis starting from the date the first liquefaction train of the Terminal that is commercially operable, with approximately three-quarters of the purchased LNG volume indexed to Brent and the remaining volume indexed to domestic United States gas indices, including Henry Hub. In the first quarter of 2020, the SPA became effective upon the conditions precedent in the SPA being satisfied or waived. The SPA obligates Rio Grande to deliver the contracted volumes of LNG to Shell at the FOB delivery point, subject to the first liquefaction train at the Terminal being commercially operable.
Governmental Permits, Approvals and Authorizations
We will be required to obtain governmental approvals and authorizations to implement our proposed business strategy, which includes the design, construction and operation of the Terminal and the export of LNG from the U.S. to foreign countries. The design, construction and operation of LNG export terminals is a regulated activity and is subject to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (the "NGA"). Federal law has bifurcated regulatory jurisdiction of LNG export activities. The FERC has jurisdiction over the siting, construction and permitting of LNG export facilities. The DOE has jurisdiction over the import and export of the natural gas commodity, including natural gas in the form of LNG. The FERC also has jurisdiction over the siting, construction and operation of interstate natural gas pipelines under Section 7 of the NGA and regulates interstate pipelines’ terms and conditions of service under Sections 4 and 5 of the NGA. In 2002, the FERC established a policy of not regulating the terms and conditions of service for LNG import or export facilities or requiring that LNG import or export facilities operate as “open access” facilities for all customers. The Energy Policy Act of 2005, which amended the NGA, codified this policy until January 1, 2015, and the FERC has not indicated that it intends to depart from its policy of not regulating the terms or conditions of service or requiring that LNG terminals operate on an open access basis.
Although the FERC acts as the lead agency with jurisdiction over LNG import and export facilities, other federal and state agencies act as cooperating agencies, coordinating with the FERC to evaluate applications for LNG export facilities. These agencies include the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (the “PHMSA”), the U.S. Coast Guard (the “Coast Guard”), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the International Boundary and Water Commission and other federal agencies with jurisdiction over potential environmental impacts of LNG terminal construction and operation. Certain federal laws, such as the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act, delegate authority over certain actions to state agencies, like the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the Railroad Commission of Texas. In reviewing an application for an LNG import or export terminal or an interstate natural gas pipeline, the FERC also works with these state agencies that have jurisdiction over certain aspects of LNG terminal or interstate natural gas pipeline construction or operation.
In particular, the PHMSA has established safety standards for interstate natural gas pipelines and LNG facilities. Similarly, the Coast Guard has established safety regulations for marine operations at LNG facilities and the operation of LNG carriers. The FERC, the PHMSA and the Coast Guard entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in 2004 that establishes the FERC’s primary role in evaluating LNG terminal applications and defines the process for coordinating the review of an LNG import or export terminal application with the PHMSA and the Coast Guard. In 2018, the FERC and the PHMSA entered into a separate Memorandum of Understanding that establishes the process and timeline by which the PHMSA should determine whether an LNG terminal project will meet the PHMSA’s LNG safety siting standards.
We filed our formal application for the Terminal with the FERC on May 5, 2016, received a Final Environmental Impact Statement from the FERC on April 26, 2019 and received the Order on November 22, 2019 authorizing the siting, construction and operation of the Terminal (the “Order”). Other major regulatory permits obtained in 2019 include the Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Following receipt of the Order, two requests for re-hearing were filed. One of those requests for rehearing also requested that the FERC stay the Order. On January 23, 2020, the FERC issued its Order on Rehearing and Stay in which the FERC rejected all challenges presented in the requests for rehearing and the request for stay of the Order. The parties who filed the requests for re-hearing have petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the Order and the order denying rehearing, and that appeal is still pending. A second appeal has also been filed with the same court by the same parties, seeking a review of the Forms 3FERC letter order amending the Order to account for the design change from six to five trains and 4this appeal is also pending. Similar appeals are also pending in the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in respect of other permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
On September 7, 2016, Rio Grande obtained an authorization for export of LNG to countries with which the U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement (“FTA”) on our own behalf and as an agent for others for a term of 30 years. On February 10, 2020, the DOE issued its “Opinion and Order Granting Long-Term Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Nations to Rio Grande" in DOE/FE Order No. 4492. In addition, on October 21, 2020, the DOE issued its Order Extending Export Term for Authorization to Non-Free Trade Agreement Nations through December 31, 2050.
Gas Supply
The proposed Terminal site will be located in Brownsville, Texas, benefiting from close access to the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. We expect to realize material benefits from providing our customers with access to these low-cost associated gas resources. Major oil companies and independent shale producers have created extraordinary efficiencies and improvements, including enhanced well recoveries through extended lateral lengths and hydraulic fracturing technology, rig productivity, and reductions in operating and lifecycle costs. However, U.S. demand has not risen proportionally with the growth in recoverable reserves.
Through the Pipeline, projected to have interconnects with a combined receipt capacity of more than 10 billion cubic feet per day (“Bcf/d”), we believe that we will have supply flexibility established by the Transportation Precedent Agreements. The combination of increased production and expanding takeaway capacity indicates that the Agua Dulce supply area, from which the Pipeline is proposed to be routed, is expected to become increasingly liquid and remain competitively priced to Henry Hub. We believe our proximity to two major gas reserves basins, increasing takeaway capacity in the area, a significant influx of production and infrastructure investment, as well as our existing contacts and discussions with some of the largest regional operators, represent key elements of a compelling feed gas strategy for partners and customers alike. We are continuing to advance substantive negotiations in these areas.
The Permian Basin offers one of the deepest inventories of economic natural gas resource in the world. According to Enverus, there are approximately 700 trillion cubic feet ("Tcf") of remaining natural gas resource in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. Permian Basin economics are largely driven by the production of oil, not gas; due to flaring restrictions, producers must market their natural gas in order to sustain oil production programs. We believe the Permian Basin will produce significant quantities of low-cost natural gas for decades.
Driven by the Permian Basin, natural gas production in Texas continues to grow at a rapid pace. According to data from the Energy Information Administration ("EIA"), natural gas production in the Permian Basin, alone, has grown by more than 40 percent annually in recent years. By the end of 2019, the Permian Basin was producing more than 11 Bcf/d of natural gas and additional discoveries continue to be made in Texas, including a new dry gas stacked play in the Eagle Ford Shale with announced recoverable resource of approximately 21 Tcf and a breakeven price below $1.25 per MMBtu.
We estimate dry gas production in Texas to reach nearly 40 Bcf/d by 2030. We do not believe there is sufficient domestic demand within Texas to support our projections for Texas natural gas production. We believe new LNG projects will need to absorb large volumes of natural gas. To support Permian Basin and Eagle Ford gas production, Texas may need more than 9.3 Bcf/d of incremental LNG export capacity by 2030; in a higher oil price environment, even more LNG export capacity may be needed. We estimate that at least 6.1 Bcf/d of incremental LNG FIDs, equivalent to more than 47 mtpa, may be needed in the next 12 to 36 months to support expected Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale natural gas production growth.
Competition
We are subject to a high degree of competition in all aspects of our business. See “Item 1.A — Risk Factors —Competition in the energy industry is intense, and some of our competitors have greater financial, technological and other resources.”
The Terminal will compete with liquefaction facilities worldwide to supply low-cost liquefaction to the market. In addition, we will compete with a variety of companies in the global LNG market, such as independent, technology-driven companies, state-owned and other independent oil and natural gas companies and utilities. Many of these competitors have longer operating histories, more development experience, greater name recognition, greater access to the LNG market, more employees and substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we currently possess.
Employees
As of December 31, 2020, we had 52 full-time employees and 5 independent contractors. We hire independent contractors on an as-needed basis and have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees.
Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 1000 Louisiana St., Suite 3900, Houston, Texas, 77002, and our telephone number is (713) 574-1880.
Available Information
Our internet website address is www.next-decade.com. We intend to use our website as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Such disclosures will be included on our website under the heading “Investors.” Accordingly, investors should monitor such portion of our website, in addition to following our press releases and SEC filings. Within our website under the heading “Investors,” we make available free of charge our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under applicable securities laws. These materials are made available as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such materials with or furnish such materials to the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this document. In addition, we intend to disclose on our website any amendments theretoto, or waivers from, our Code of Conduct and Ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the SEC.
The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
We are subject to uncertainties and risks due to the nature of the business activities we conduct. The following information describes certain written representationsuncertainties and risks that could affect our business, financial condition or results of operations or could cause actual results to differ materially from certain reporting persons that no other reports were required, the Company believes that directors, officers and stockholders owning more than ten percent (10%)estimates or expectations contained in our forward-looking statements on page 4 of Company equity securities complied with their Section 16(a) filing requirementsthis Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section does not describe all risks applicable to us, our industry or our business, and it is intended only as a summary of known material risks that are specific to us. We may experience additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are in the process of developing LNG liquefaction and export projects, and the success of such projects is unpredictable; as such, positive cash flows and even revenues will be several years away, if they occur at all.
We are not expected to generate cash flow, or even obtain revenues, unless and until the Terminal is operational, which is expected to be at least four years away, and accordingly, distributions to investors may be limited, delayed, or non-existent.
Our cash flow and consequently our ability to distribute earnings is solely dependent upon the revenue Rio Grande receives from the Terminal and the transfer of funds by Rio Grande to NextDecade in the form of distributions or otherwise. Rio Grande’s ability to complete the Terminal, as discussed further below, will be dependent upon, among other things, our ability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals and raise the capital necessary to fund development of the Terminal.
Our ability to pay dividends is almost entirely dependent upon our ability to complete the Terminal and generate cash and net operating income from operations. We do not expect to generate any revenue until the completion of construction of the first phase of the Terminal. Upon such completion, financing and numerous other factors affecting the Terminal may reduce our cash flow. As a result, we may not make distributions of any amount or any distributions may be delayed.
Substantially all of our anticipated revenue will be dependent upon the Terminal. Due to our lack of asset diversification, adverse developments at or affecting the Terminal would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained a more diverse portfolio of assets.
We will be required to seek additional debt and equity financing in the future to complete the Terminal and may not be able to secure such financing on acceptable terms, or at all.
Since we will be unable to generate any revenue while we are in the development and construction stages for multiple years, we will need additional financing to provide the capital required to execute our business plan. We will need significant funding to develop and construct the Terminal as well as for working capital requirements and other operating and general corporate purposes.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient capital on acceptable terms, or at all. If sufficient capital is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate the development of business opportunities, and our operations and financial condition may be adversely affected to a significant extent.
Debt financing, if obtained, may involve agreements that include liens on Terminal assets and covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as paying dividends or making distributions, incurring additional debt, acquiring or disposing of assets and increasing expenses. Debt financing would also be required to be repaid regardless of our operating results.
In addition, the ability to obtain financing for the Terminal is expected to be contingent upon, among other things, our ability to enter into sufficient long-term commercial agreements prior to the commencement of construction. For additional information regarding our ability to enter into sufficient long-term commercial agreements, see “— Our ability to generate cash is substantially dependent upon us entering into satisfactory contracts with third parties and the performance of those third parties under those contracts.”
Postponement in making a positive FID in the construction and operation of the Terminal may require us to amend some of our agreements.
The terms of certain agreements to which we are a party require that a positive FID in the Terminal occurs no later than specified dates or may otherwise terminate at the end of their respective terms. If we postpone making a positive FID in the construction and operation of the Terminal beyond any such date or term, we may need to amend the corresponding agreement in order to extend such date or term. Our business could be materially adversely affected if certain of such agreements are not amended.
The Terminal’s operations will be substantially dependent on the development and operation of the Pipeline by Enbridge and its affiliates.
The Terminal will be dependent on a pipeline owned by an affiliate of Enbridge (the “Transporter”) for the delivery of all of its natural gas. The Pipeline is currently in development and its construction will require the Transporter to secure options for rights-of-way along the proposed Pipeline route. It is possible that, in negotiating to secure these rights-of-way, the Transporter encounters recalcitrant landowners or competitive projects, which could result in additional time needed to secure the Pipeline route and, consequently, delays in, or abandonment of, its construction. Construction of the Pipeline could be delayed or abandoned for any of many other reasons, such as it becoming economically disadvantageous to the Transporter, a failure to obtain or maintain necessary permits for construction or operation, mechanical or structural failures, inadvertent damages during construction, or any terrorist attack, including cyberterrorism, affecting the Pipeline or the Transporter. Any such delays in the construction of the Pipeline could delay the development of the Terminal and its becoming operational.
We may be subject to risks related to doing business in, and having counterparties based in, foreign countries.
We may engage in operations or make substantial commitments to and investments in, and enter into agreements with, counterparties located outside the U.S., which would expose us to political, governmental and economic instability and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
Any disruption caused by these factors could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects. Risks associated with potential operations, commitments and investments outside of the U.S. include but are not limited to risks of:
• | currency exchange restrictions and currency fluctuations; |
• | war or terrorist attack; |
• | expropriation or nationalization of assets; |
• | renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts or international trade arrangements; |
• | changing political conditions; |
• | macro-economic conditions impacting key markets and sources of supply; |
• | changing laws and policies affecting trade, taxation, financial regulation, immigration, and investment; |
• | the implementation of tariffs by the U.S. or foreign countries in which we do business; |
• | duplicative taxation by different governments; |
• | general hazards associated with the assertion of sovereignty over areas in which operations are conducted, transactions occur, or counterparties are located; and |
• | the unexpected credit rating downgrade of countries in which our LNG customers are based. |
As our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, any operations conducted outside the U.S. or transactions denominated in foreign currencies would face additional risks of fluctuating currency values and exchange rates, hard currency shortages and controls on currency exchange. In addition, we would be subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rate changes on our financial reports when translating our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses from operations or transactions outside of the U.S. into U.S. dollars at the then-applicable exchange rates. These translations could result in changes to our results of operations from period to period.
Costs for the Terminal are subject to various factors.
Construction costs for the Terminal will be subject to various factors such as economic and market conditions, government policy, claims and litigation risk, competition, the final terms of any definitive agreement for services with our EPC service provider, change orders, delays in construction, legal and regulatory requirements, unanticipated regulatory delays, site issues, increased component and material costs, escalation of labor costs, labor disputes, increased spending to maintain our construction schedule and other factors. In particular, costs for the Terminal are expected to be substantially affected by:
• | global prices of nickel, steel, concrete, pipe, aluminum and other component parts of the Terminal and the contractual terms upon which our contractors are able to source and procure required materials; |
• | any U.S. import tariffs or quotas on steel, aluminum, pipe or other component parts of the Terminal, which may raise the prices of certain materials used in the Terminal; |
• | commodity and consumer prices (principally, natural gas, crude oil and fuels that compete with them in our target markets) on which our economic assumptions are based; |
• | the exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar with other currencies; |
• | changes in regulatory regimes in the U.S. and the countries to which we will be authorized to sell LNG; |
• | levels of competition in the U.S. and worldwide; |
• | changes in the tax regimes in the countries to which we sell LNG or in which we operate; |
• | cost inflation relating to the personnel, materials and equipment used in our operations; |
• | delays caused by events of force majeure or unforeseeable climatic events; |
• | interest rates; and |
• | synergy benefits associated with the development of multiple phases of the Terminal using identical design and construction philosophies. |
In addition to our willingness to make a FID and our ability to construct the Terminal and achieve operations, events related to such activities may cause actual costs of the Terminal to vary from the range, combination and timing of assumptions used for projected costs of the Terminal. Such variations may be material and adverse, and an investor may lose all or a portion of its investment.
The construction and operation of the Terminal remains subject to further governmental approvals, and some approvals may be subject to further conditions, review and/or revocation and other legal and regulatory risks, which may result in delays, increased costs or decreased cash flows.
We are required to obtain governmental approvals and authorizations to implement our proposed business strategy, which includes the design, construction and operation of the Terminal and the export of LNG from the U.S. to foreign countries. As described above under “Business− Governmental Permits, Approvals and Authorizations,” the design, construction and operation of LNG export terminals is a highly regulated activity in the U.S., subject to a number of permitting requirements, regulatory approvals and ongoing safety and operational compliance programs. There is no guarantee that we will obtain or, if obtained, maintain these governmental authorizations, approvals and permits. Failure to obtain, or failure to obtain on a timely basis, or failure to maintain any of these governmental authorizations, approvals and permits could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Authorizations obtained from the FERC, the DOE and other federal and state regulatory agencies also contain ongoing conditions, and additional approval and permit requirements may be imposed. We do not know whether or when any such approvals or permits can be obtained, or whether any existing or potential interventions or other actions by third parties will interfere with our ability to obtain and maintain such permits or approvals. If we are unable to obtain and maintain the necessary approvals and permits, including as a result of untimely notices or filings, we may not be able to recover our investment in the Terminal. Additionally, government disruptions, such as a U.S. government shutdown, may delay or halt our ability to obtain and maintain necessary approvals and permits. There is no assurance that we will obtain and maintain these governmental permits, approvals and authorizations, or that we will be able to obtain them on a timely basis, duringand failure to obtain and maintain any of these permits, approvals or authorizations could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
In addition, some of these governmental authorizations, approvals and permits require extensive environmental review. Some groups have perceived, and other groups could perceive, that the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.proposed construction and operation of the Terminal could negatively impact the environment or cultural heritage sites. Objections from such groups could cause delays, damage to reputation and difficulties in obtaining governmental authorizations, approvals or permits or prevent the obtaining of such authorizations, approvals or permits altogether. Although the necessary authorizations, approvals and permits to construct and operate the Terminal may be obtained, such authorizations, approvals and permits may be subject to ongoing conditions imposed by regulatory agencies or may be subject to legal proceedings not involving us, which is customary for U.S. LNG projects.
Availability
The Terminal will be subject to a number of Committee Chartersenvironmental laws and Codesregulations that impose significant compliance costs, and existing and future environmental and similar laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs, liabilities or additional operating restrictions.
Our business will be subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations and laws, including regulations and restrictions on discharges and releases to the air, land and water and the handling, storage and disposal of Ethics
The chartershazardous materials and wastes in connection with the development, construction and operation of its liquefaction facilities. These regulations and laws will require us to maintain permits, provide governmental authorities with access to its facilities for inspection and provide reports related to its compliance. Violation of these laws and regulations could lead to substantial fines and penalties or to capital expenditures related to pollution control or remediation equipment that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects. Federal and state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the lawfulness of the original conduct, for the Auditrelease of certain types or quantities of hazardous substances into the environment. As the owner and Risk Committee (the “Audit Committee”),operator of the Nominating, Corporate GovernanceTerminal, we could be liable for the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances released into the environment and Compensation Committee (the “NCGC Committee”)for damage to natural resources.
In addition, future federal, state and local legislation and regulations, such as regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions and the Operations Committee,transportation of LNG may impose unforeseen burdens and increased costs on our business that could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. As an international shipper of LNG, our operations could also be impacted by environmental laws applicable under international treaties or foreign jurisdictions.
Changes in legislation and regulations or interpretations thereof, such as well asthose relating to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Codeimportation and exportation of ConductLNG, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and Ethics (the “Codeprospects and could cause additional expenditures and delays in connection with the proposed LNG facilities and their construction.
The laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business, including federal agencies’ interpretations of Conduct”), Whistleblower Policy and Insider Trading Policy can be found, free of charge,policies under such laws rules and regulations, are subject to change, either through new or modified regulations enacted on the Corporate Governance page underfederal, state or local level or by a change in policy of the “Investors” section of the Company’s website, www.next-decade.com. The Code of Conduct is applicable to all directors, officers and employees. The Company intends to disclose any changes to, or waivers from,agencies charged with enforcing such regulations. For example, the provisions of the CodeEnergy Policy Act of Conduct2005 that wouldcodified the FERC’s policy of not regulating the terms and conditions of service for LNG import or export facilities expired in 2015. Although the FERC has not indicated that it intends to depart from this policy, there can be no assurance it will not do so in the future. The nature and extent of any changes in these laws, rules, regulations and policies may be unpredictable and may have material effects on our business. Future legislation and regulations or changes in existing legislation and regulations, or interpretations thereof, such as those relating to the liquefaction, storage, or regasification of LNG, or its transportation, could cause additional expenditures, restrictions and delays in connection with our operations as well as other future projects, the extent of which cannot be predicted and which may require us to limit substantially, delay or cease operations in some circumstances. Revised, reinterpreted or additional laws and regulations that result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs and restrictions could have an adverse effect on our business, the ability to expand our business, including into new markets, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
7
We will be dependent on third-party contractors for the successful completion of the Terminal, and these contractors may be unable to complete the Terminal or may build a non-conforming Terminal.
The construction of the Terminal is expected to take several years, will be confined to a limited geographic area and could be subject to delays, cost overruns, labor disputes and other factors that could adversely affect financial performance or impair our ability to execute our scheduled business plan.
Timely and cost-effective completion of the Terminal in conformity with agreed-upon specifications will be highly dependent upon the performance of third-party contractors pursuant to their agreements. However, we have not yet entered into definitive agreements with certain of the contractors, advisors and consultants necessary for the development and construction of the Terminal. We may not be able to successfully enter into such construction contracts on terms or at prices that are acceptable to us.
Further, faulty construction that does not conform to our design and quality standards may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. For example, improper equipment installation may lead to a shortened life of our equipment, increased operations and maintenance costs or a reduced availability or production capacity of the affected facility. The ability of our third-party contractors to perform successfully under any agreements to be entered into is dependent on a number of factors, including force majeure events and such contractors’ ability to:
• | design, engineer and receive critical components and equipment necessary for the Terminal to operate in accordance with specifications and address any start-up and operational issues that may arise in connection with the commencement of commercial operations; |
• | attract, develop and retain skilled personnel and engage and retain third-party subcontractors, and address any labor issues that may arise; |
• | post required construction bonds and comply with the terms thereof, and maintain their own financial condition, including adequate working capital; |
• | adhere to any warranties the contractors provide in their EPC contracts; and |
• | respond to difficulties such as equipment failure, delivery delays, schedule changes and failure to perform by subcontractors, some of which are beyond their control, and manage the construction process generally, including engaging and retaining third-party contractors, coordinating with other contractors and regulatory agencies and dealing with inclement weather conditions. |
Furthermore, we may have disagreements with our third-party contractors about different elements of the construction process, which could lead to the assertion of rights and remedies under the related contracts, resulting in a contractor’s unwillingness to perform further work on the relevant project. We may also face difficulties in commissioning a newly constructed facility. Any of the foregoing issues or significant project delays in the development or construction of the Terminal could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our ability to generate cash is substantially dependent upon us entering into satisfactory contracts with third parties and the performance of those third parties under those contracts.
We have not yet entered into, and may never be able to enter into, satisfactory commercial arrangements with third-party suppliers of feedstock or other required supplies to the Terminal, or customers for products and services from the Terminal.
Our business strategy regarding how and when the Terminal’s export capacity or LNG produced by the Terminal is marketed may change based on market factors. Without limitation, our business strategy may change due to inability to enter into agreements with customers or based on our or market participants’ views regarding future supply and demand of LNG, prices, available worldwide natural gas liquefaction capacity or regasification capacity or other factors. If efforts to market the Terminal’s export capacity or LNG produced by the Terminal are not successful, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
Our construction and operations activities will be subject to a number of development risks, operational hazards, regulatory approvals and other risks which may not be fully covered by insurance, and which could cause cost overruns and delays that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
Siting, development and construction of the Terminal will be subject to the risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any construction project resulting from numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
• | difficulties or delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain, sufficient debt or equity financing on reasonable terms; |
• | failure to obtain all necessary government and third-party permits, approvals and licenses for the construction and operation of any of the proposed LNG facilities; |
• | failure to obtain sale and purchase agreements that generate sufficient revenue to support the financing and construction of the Terminal; |
• | difficulties in engaging qualified contractors necessary to the construction of the contemplated Terminal or other LNG facilities; |
• | shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor; |
• | natural disasters and catastrophes, such as hurricanes, explosions, fires, floods, industrial accidents and terrorism; |
• | delays in the delivery of ordered materials; |
• | work stoppages and labor disputes; |
• | competition with other domestic and international LNG export terminals; |
• | unanticipated changes in domestic and international market demand for and supply of natural gas and LNG, which will depend in part on supplies of and prices for alternative energy sources and the discovery of new sources of natural resources; |
• | unexpected or unanticipated additional improvements; and |
• | adverse general economic conditions. |
Delays beyond the estimated development periods, as well as cost overruns, could increase the cost of completion beyond the amounts that are currently estimated, which could require us to obtain additional sources of financing to fund the activities until the Terminal is constructed and operational, which could cause further delays. The need for additional financing may also make the Terminal uneconomic. Any delay in completion of the Terminal may also cause a delay in the receipt of revenues projected from the Terminal or cause a loss of one or more customers. As a result, any significant construction delay, whatever the cause, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
Our operations will be subject to all of the hazards inherent in the receipt and processing of natural gas to LNG, and associated short-term storage including:
• | damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment, loading terminal, and surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires and other natural disasters, acts of terrorism and acts of third parties; |
• | damage from subsurface and/or waterway activity (for example, sedimentation of shipping channel access); |
• | leaks of natural gas, natural gas liquids, or oil or losses of natural gas, natural gas liquid, or oil as a result of the malfunction of equipment or facilities; |
• | fires, ruptures and explosions; |
• | other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss of life, pollution and suspension of operations; and |
• | hazards experienced by other operators that may affect our operations by instigating increased regulations and oversight. |
Any of these risks could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations or result in substantial loss to us as a result of claims for:
• | injury or loss of life; |
• | damage to and destruction of property, natural resources and equipment; |
• | pollution and other environmental damage; |
• | regulatory investigations and penalties; |
• | suspension of our operations; |
• | failure to perform contractual obligations; and |
• | repair and remediation costs. |
otherwise be
Due to the scale of the Terminal, we may encounter capacity limits in insurance markets, thereby limiting our ability to economically obtain insurance with our desired level of coverage limits and terms. We may elect not to obtain insurance for any or all of these risks if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, contractual liabilities and pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience increased labor costs, and the unavailability of skilled workers or our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect us. In addition, changes in our senior management or other key personnel could affect our business operations.
We are dependent upon the available labor pool of skilled employees authorized to work in the U.S. We compete with other energy companies and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to be disclosed under Item 5.05construct and operate our facilities and pipelines and to provide our customers with the highest quality service. A shortage in the labor pool of a Form 8-Kskilled workers able to legally work in the U.S. or other general inflationary pressures or changes in applicable laws and regulations could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel and could require an increase in the wage and benefits packages that we offer, thereby increasing our operating costs. Any increase in our operating costs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.
We depend on our executive officers for various activities. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our personnel. Although we have arrangements relating to compensation and benefits with certain of our executive officers, we do not have any employment contracts or other agreements with key personnel binding them to provide services for any particular term. The loss of the Company’s website. The Company will also provide printed copiesservices of any of these materialsindividuals could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Technological innovation, competition or other factors may negatively impact our anticipated competitive advantage or our processes.
Our success will depend on our ability to create and maintain a competitive position in the natural gas liquefaction industry. We do not have any exclusive rights to any stockholderof the technologies that we will be utilizing. In addition, the technology we anticipate using in the Terminal may face competition due to the technological advances of other companies or other interested person upon request to NextDecade Corporation, Attention: Krysta De Lima, General Counselsolutions, including more efficient and Corporate Secretary, 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 3900, Houston, Texas 77002. The information on the Company’s website is not,cost-effective processes or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors or others, which could affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and shall not be deemedprospects.
Failure of exported LNG to be a competitive source of energy for international markets could adversely affect our customers and could materially and adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
Operations of the Terminal will be dependent upon our ability to deliver LNG supplies from the U.S., which is primarily dependent upon LNG being a competitive source of energy internationally. The success of our business plan is dependent, in part, on the extent to which LNG can, for significant periods and in significant volumes, be supplied from North America and delivered to international markets at a lower cost than the cost of this reportalternative energy sources. Through the use of improved exploration technologies, additional sources of natural gas may be discovered outside the U.S., which could increase the available supply of natural gas outside the U.S. and could result in natural gas in those markets being available at a lower cost than that of LNG exported to those markets.
Additionally, our liquefaction projects will be subject to the risk of LNG price competition at times when we need to replace any existing LNG sale and purchase contract, whether due to natural expiration, default or incorporatedotherwise, or enter into new LNG sale and purchase contracts. Factors relating to competition may prevent us from entering into a new or replacement LNG sale and purchase contract on economically comparable terms as prior LNG sale and purchase contracts, or at all. Factors which may negatively affect potential demand for LNG from our liquefaction projects are diverse and include, among others:
• | increases in worldwide LNG production capacity and availability of LNG for market supply; |
• | decreases in demand for LNG or increases in demand for LNG, but at levels below those required to maintain current price equilibrium with respect to supply; |
• | increases in the cost of natural gas feedstock supplied to any project; |
• | decreases in the cost of competing sources of natural gas or alternate sources of energy such as coal, heavy fuel oil, diesel, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar; |
• | decrease in the price of non-U.S. LNG, including decreases in price as a result of contracts indexed to lower oil prices; |
• | increases in capacity and utilization of nuclear power and related facilities; |
• | increases in the cost of LNG shipping; and |
• | displacement of LNG by pipeline natural gas or alternate fuels in locations where access to these energy sources is not currently available. |
Political instability in foreign countries that import natural gas, or strained relations between such countries and the U.S. may also impede the willingness or ability of LNG suppliers, purchasers and merchants in such countries to import LNG from the U.S. Furthermore, some foreign purchasers of LNG may have economic or other filingsreasons to obtain their LNG from non-U.S. markets or our competitors’ liquefaction facilities in the Company makesU.S.
As a result of these and other factors, LNG may not be a competitive source of energy internationally. The failure of LNG to be a competitive supply alternative to local natural gas, oil and other alternative energy sources in markets accessible to our customers could adversely affect the ability of our customers to deliver LNG from the U.S. on a commercial basis. Any significant impediment to the ability to deliver LNG from the U.S. generally or from the Terminal specifically could have a material adverse effect on our customers and our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
Decreases in the global demand for and price of natural gas (versus the price of imported LNG) could lead to reduced development of LNG projects worldwide.
We are subject to risks associated with the SEC.
Stockholder Nominees for Director
Theredevelopment, operation and financing of domestic LNG facilities. The development of domestic LNG facilities and projects is generally based on assumptions about the future price of natural gas and LNG and the conditions of the global natural gas and LNG markets. Natural gas and LNG prices have been, and are likely to remain in the future, volatile and subject to wide fluctuations that are difficult to predict. As a result, our activities will expose us to risks of commodity price movements, which we believe could be mitigated by entering into long-term LNG sales contracts. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in entering into long-term LNG sales contracts. Additionally, the global LNG market could shift toward the use of shorter-term LNG sales contracts.
Fluctuations in commodity prices may create a mismatch between natural gas and petroleum prices, which could have a significant impact on our future revenues. Commodity prices and volumes are volatile due to many factors over which we have no control, including competing liquefaction capacity in North America; the international supply and receiving capacity of LNG; LNG marine transportation capacity; weather conditions affecting production or transportation of LNG from the Terminal; domestic and global demand for natural gas; the effect of government regulation on the production, transportation and sale of natural gas; oil and natural gas exploration and production activities; and the development of and changes in the cost of alternative energy sources for natural gas and political and economic conditions worldwide.
Our activities are also dependent on the price and availability of materials for the construction of the Terminal, such as nickel, aluminum, pipe, and steel, which may be subject to import tariffs in the U.S. market and are all also subject to factors affecting commodity prices and volumes. In addition, authorities with jurisdiction over wholesale power rates in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere, as well as independent system operators overseeing some of these markets, may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms which may adversely impact or otherwise limit trading margins and lead to diminished opportunities for gain. We cannot predict the impact energy trading may have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Further, the development of liquefaction facilities takes a substantial amount of time, requires significant capital investment, may be delayed by unforeseen and uncontrollable factors and is dependent on our financial viability and ability to market LNG internationally.
Competition in the LNG industry is intense, and some of our competitors have greater financial, technological and other resources.
We plan to operate in the highly competitive area of LNG production and face intense competition from independent, technology-driven companies as well as from both major and other independent oil and natural gas companies and utilities.
Many competing companies have secured access to, or are pursuing development or acquisition of, LNG facilities in North America. We may face competition from major energy companies and others in pursuing our proposed business strategy to provide liquefaction and export products and services at the Terminal. In addition, competitors have and are developing LNG terminals in other markets, which will compete with U.S. LNG facilities. Some of these competitors have longer operating histories, more development experience, greater name recognition, superior tax incentives, more employees and substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we currently possess. The superior resources that some of these competitors have available for deployment could allow them to compete successfully against us, which could have a material changesadverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
There may be shortages of LNG vessels worldwide, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
The construction and delivery of LNG vessels requires significant capital and long construction lead times, and the availability of the vessels could be delayed to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nomineesdetriment of our business and customers due to the Board.following:
Audit Committee
• | an inadequate number of shipyards constructing LNG vessels and a backlog of orders at these shipyards; |
• | political or economic disturbances in the countries where the vessels are being constructed; |
• | changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organizations; |
• | work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyards; |
• | bankruptcies or other financial crises of shipbuilders; |
• | quality or engineering problems; |
• | weather interference or catastrophic events, such as a major earthquake, tsunami, or fire; or |
• | shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials. |
We will rely on third-party engineers to estimate the future capacity ratings and performance capabilities of the Terminal, and these estimates may prove to be inaccurate.
We will rely on third parties for the design and engineering services underlying our estimates of the future capacity ratings and performance capabilities of the Terminal. Any of our LNG facilities, when constructed, may not have the capacity ratings and performance capabilities that we intend or estimate. Failure of any of our facilities to achieve our intended capacity ratings and performance capabilities could prevent us from achieving the commercial start dates under our future LNG sale and purchase agreements and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
Terrorist attacks, including cyberterrorism, or military campaigns involving us or the Terminal could result in delays in, or cancellation of, construction or closure of the Project.
A terrorist or military incident involving the Terminal may result in delays in, or cancellation of, construction of the Terminal, which would increase our costs and prevent us from obtaining expected cash flows. A terrorist incident could also result in temporary or permanent closure of the Terminal, which could increase costs and decrease cash flows, depending on the duration of the closure. Operations at the Terminal could also become subject to increased governmental scrutiny that may result in additional security measures at a significant incremental cost. In addition, the threat of terrorism and the impact of military campaigns may lead to continued volatility in prices for natural gas that could adversely affect our business and customers, including the ability of our suppliers or customers to satisfy their respective obligations under our commercial agreements. Instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism, including cyberterrorism, or war could also materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital. The continuation of these developments may subject our construction and operations to increased risks, as well as increased costs, and, depending on their ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
The operation of the Terminal may be subject to significant operating hazards and uninsured risks, one or more of which may create significant liabilities and losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.
The Audit Committeeplan of operations for the Terminal is subject to the inherent risks associated with LNG operations, including explosions, pollution, release of toxic substances, fires, hurricanes and other adverse weather conditions, and other hazards, each of which could result in significant delays in commencement or interruptions of operations and/or result in damage to or destruction of the Terminal and assets or damage to persons and property.
We do not, nor do we intend to, maintain insurance against all these risks and losses. We may not be able to maintain desired or required insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
We are dependent on a limited number of customers for the purchase of LNG.
The number of potential customers is limited. Some potential purchasers of the LNG to be produced from the Terminal are new to the LNG business and have limited experience in the industry. We will be reliant upon the ability of these customers to enter into satisfactory downstream arrangements in their home markets for the licenses to import and sell re-gasified LNG. Some of these jurisdictions are heavily regulated and dominated by state entities. In certain instances, customers may require credit enhancement measures in order to satisfy project-financing requirements.
Objections from local communities or environmental groups can delay the Terminal.
Some local communities and/or environmental groups could perceive the proposed construction and operation of the Terminal as negatively impacting the environment, wildlife, cultural heritage sites or the public health of residents. Objections from local communities or environmental groups could cause delays, limit access to or increase the cost of construction capital, cause reputational damage and impede us in obtaining or renewing permits.
The Terminal will be dependent on the availability of gas supply at the Agua Dulce supply area.
The Pipeline is expected to collect and transport natural gas to the Terminal. The header system at the upstream end of the Pipeline is expected to have multiple interconnects to the existing natural gas pipeline grid located in the Agua Dulce supply area (the “Agua Dulce Hub”). The Agua Dulce Hub includes deliveries from, but not limited to, ConocoPhillip’s 1,100-mile South Texas intrastate and gas gathering pipeline system and ExxonMobil’s 925 MMcf/d King Ranch processing facility. As the Pipeline system interconnects are expected to be relatively close to the Agua Dulce Hub, it is expected that gas will be available for purchase in large volumes at commercially acceptable prices. Nonetheless, disruptions in upstream supply sources or increased market demand could impact the availability of gas supply to the Pipeline header system, which would result in curtailments at the Terminal.
Each liquefaction train for the Terminal is expected to involve the transportation and liquefaction of approximately 0.9 Bcf/day of natural gas, for a total of 4.5 Bcf/day for five liquefaction trains at full build-out. Gas sales agreements for the supply of these volumes could entail negotiations with multiple parties for firm and interruptible gas supply and transportation services to the Pipeline header system, as well as pipeline interconnects and ancillary operational agreements. Delays caused by third parties in the course of negotiating agreements and constructing the required interconnects could delay the start of commercial operations for the Terminal.
Unethical conduct and non-compliance with applicable laws could have a significant adverse effect on our business.
Incidents of unethical behavior, fraudulent activity, corruption or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations could be damaging to our operations and reputation and may subject us to criminal and civil penalties or loss of operating licenses. We have implemented an anti-corruption policy which applies to all employees and contractors without exception and we are a member of TRACE International, an internationally recognized anti-bribery compliance organization. Our legal team screens potential partners, agents and advisors in multiple databases to which it has access and regularly conducts due diligence interviews with potential counterparties. Due to the global nature of the LNG business and the diversity of jurisdictions in which our customers operate, it is possible that a prospective counterparty could be accused of behavior that falls short of our expectations in this regard, leading to reputational damage and potential legal liabilities, notwithstanding our best efforts to prevent such behaviors.
The outbreak of COVID-19 and volatility in the energy markets may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects, including our efforts to reach a final investment decision with respect to the Terminal.
The outbreak of COVID-19 and its development into a pandemic in March 2020 have resulted in significant disruption globally. Actions taken by various governmental authorities, individuals and companies around the world to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have restricted travel, business operations, and the overall level of individual movement and in-person interaction across the globe. Furthermore, the impact of the pandemic, including a resulting reduction in demand for natural gas, coupled with the sharp decline in commodity prices following the announcement of price reductions and production increases in March 2020 by members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) led to significant global economic contraction generally and in our industry in particular. While an agreement to cut production was announced by OPEC and its allies, the situation, coupled with the impact of COVID-19, has continued to result in a significant downturn in the oil and gas industry. Prospects for the development and financing of the Terminal are based in part on factors including global economic conditions that have been, structuredand are likely to continue to be, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused us to modify our business practices, including by restricting employee travel, requiring employees to work remotely and cancelling physical participation in meetings, events and conferences, and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business partners. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by COVID-19 or otherwise be satisfactory to government authorities. If a number of our employees were to contract COVID-19 at the same time, our operations could be adversely affected.
A sustained disruption in the capital markets from the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically with respect to the energy industry, could negatively impact our ability to raise capital. In the past, we have financed our operations by the issuance of equity and equity-based securities. However, we cannot predict when the macro-economic disruption stemming from COVID-19 will ebb or when the economy will return to pre-COVID-19 levels. This macro-economic disruption may disrupt our ability to raise additional capital to finance our operations in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects, and could ultimately cause our business to fail.
The COVID-19 pandemic may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, such as risks related to the development of the Terminal, postponement in making a positive FID, doing business in foreign countries, obtaining governmental approvals, and exported LNG remaining a competitive source of energy for international markets, global demand for and price of natural gas, and fluctuation in the price of our common stock.
The extent to which COVID-19 ultimately impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of COVID-19, its severity, the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Even after COVID-19 has subsided, we may continue to experience materially adverse impacts to our business as a result of its global economic impact, including any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future, and lasting effects on the price of natural gas.
Our common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq.
Our common stock is currently listed on Nasdaq. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with the requirements of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Rosenfeld, Kripalani and Wells with Mr. Wells as Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board has also determined that each of Messrs. Rosenfeld and Wells qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act and possesses the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise as required under thecontinued listing standards of Nasdaq. If we fail to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq, Stock Market (“Nasdaq”).our common stock may become subject to delisting. If Nasdaq delists our common stock from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the continued listing standards, we and our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:
8
• | a limited availability of market quotations for our securities; |
• | a limited amount of analyst coverage; and |
• | a decreased ability for us to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future. |
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future. Holders of our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
The securities markets in general and our common stock have experienced significant price and volume volatility. The market price and trading volume of our common stock may continue to experience significant fluctuations due not only to general stock market conditions but also to a change in sentiment in the market regarding our operations, business prospects or those of companies in our industry. In addition to the other risk factors discussed in this section, the price and volume volatility of our common stock may be affected by:
• | domestic and worldwide supply of and demand for natural gas and corresponding fluctuations in the price of natural gas; |
• | fluctuations in our quarterly or annual financial results or those of other companies in our industry; |
• | issuance of additional equity securities which causes further dilution to stockholders; |
• | sales of a high volume of shares of our common stock by our stockholders; |
• | operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us; |
• | events affecting other companies that the market deems comparable to us; |
• | changes in government regulation or proposals applicable to us; |
• | actual or potential non-performance by any customer or a counterparty under any agreement; |
• | announcements made by us or our competitors of significant contracts; |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
• | changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; |
2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
• | general conditions in the industries in which we operate; |
• | general economic conditions; and |
• | the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock or changes in financial or other estimates by analysts. |
The following table sets forth all compensation paid, payable, awarded, granted, given, or otherwise provided, directly or indirectly, bystock prices of companies in the Company or its subsidiaries, in U.S. dollars,LNG industry have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the Company’s named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Year |
| Salary($) |
| Bonus(1) ($) |
| Stock |
| Total($) |
Matthew K. Schatzman |
| 2018 |
| 550,000 |
| — |
| 9,103,573 | (3) | 9,653,573 |
President and Chief Executive Officer(2) |
| 2017 |
| 158,654 | (4) | — |
| — |
| 158,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen Eisbrenner |
| 2018 |
| 617,500 |
| 376,160 |
| — |
| 993,660 |
Chairman and Former Chief Executive Officer(2) |
| 2017 |
| 508,750 |
| 432,438 |
| 42,144,551 | (5) | 43,085,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Atkins |
| 2018 |
| 299,750 |
| 154,000 |
| — |
| 453,750 |
Chief Financial Officer |
| 2017 |
| 275,000 |
| 116,875 |
| 6,333,713 | (6) | 6,725,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Krysta De Lima |
| 2018 |
| 299,750 |
| 167,000 |
| — |
| 466,750 |
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
| 2017 |
| 275,000 |
| 116,875 |
| 4,709,689 | (7) | 5,101,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Narrative Disclosure
Overview of Compensation for Matthew K. Schatzman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Schatzman has served as President of the Company since September 2017 and has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 1, 2018. The Schatzman Employment Agreement provides for a term through June 30, 2020 and will be automatically extended for additional one-year periods unless and until the Company or Mr. Schatzman gives to the other written notice at least one-hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the applicable renewal date of a decision notcompany’s securities, securities class action litigation often has been initiated against a company. If any class action litigation is initiated against us, we may incur substantial costs and our management’s attention may be diverted from our operations, which could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to renew for an additional year.
Effective January 1, 2019, the Schatzman Employment Agreement was amendedexisting stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to reflect (i) an increase in his annual base salary to $617,000 from $550,000 and (ii) an increase in his target annual bonus to 100% from 90%relinquish rights. Additionally, sales of his base salary based upon the achievement of performance targets established by the Board from time to time. Mr. Schatzman’s annual bonus for 2017 was pro-rated to reflect his actual time of employment with the Company. The pro-rata bonus of $119,885 was paid solely in shares of Common Stock calculated by dividing such bonus amount by $8.16, the share price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance, pursuant to a restricted stock award agreement dated January 8, 2018 (the “Schatzman Award Agreement”). Mr. Schatzman’s annual bonus for 2018 of $495,000 was also paid solely in shares of Common Stock calculated by dividing such bonus amount by $3.84, the share price of Common Stock on the date of issuance. The shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Schatzman for his 2017 and 2018 bonuses were issued under the 2017 Equity Plan.
The Schatzman Employment Agreement entitled him to a grant of incentive stocksubstantial number of shares of Common Stock. Pursuant to the Schatzman Award Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Schatzman: (i) 48,450 shares of fully vested shares of Common Stock and (ii) 1,052,492 shares of Common Stock, subject to the terms of a restrictedour common stock award agreement between the Company and Mr. Schatzman (the “Restricted Incentive Stock”).
The Schatzman Employment Agreement also provides that if the Company at any time terminates Mr. Schatzman’s employment without Cause (as definedor other securities in the Schatzman Employment Agreement),public market could cause our stock price to fall.
We may seek the additional capital necessary to fund our operations through public or if Mr. Schatzman voluntarily terminates the agreement with Good Reason (as defined in the Schatzman Employment Agreement), Mr. Schatzman will be entitled to (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of his then current base salary for a period of 12 months, (ii) a pro-rata portion of his annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (based on an amount equal to his then applicable annual bonus target percentage multiplied by his then applicable base salary)private equity offerings and (iii) the full vesting of his unvested shares of Restricted Incentive Stock.
If the Company elects not to renew the Schatzman Employment Agreement by providing notice of non-renewal at least 180 days before the end of the then current term, Mr. Schatzman will be entitled to a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of his then current base salary for a period of 12 months and a pro-rata portion of his annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (based on an amount equal to his then applicable annual bonus target percentage multiplied by his then applicable base salary). Mr. Schatzman’s prior grants of Restricted Incentive Stock, to the extent then vested, shall remain outstanding in accordance with their terms and any unvested Restricted Incentive Stock shall lapse and be forfeited.
Additionally, upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Schatzman Employment Agreement), any unvested portion of his Restricted Incentive Stock shall immediately vest.
The Schatzman Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Schatzman is eligible for health insurance and disability insurance and other customary employee benefits. The Schatzman Employment Agreement also contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants and covenants regarding the treatment of confidential information.
10
Overview of Compensation for Kathleen Eisbrenner, Chairman and Former Chief Executive Officer
Mrs. Eisbrenner serves as Chairman of the Board and served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 2017 until February 2018. On May 20, 2015, NextDecade entered into an employment agreement with Mrs. Eisbrenner, which was amended pursuant to a letter agreement, dated April 17, 2017, among Mrs. Eisbrenner, NextDecade and certain funds managed by YCMGA (as amended, the “Eisbrenner Agreement”). The Eisbrenner Agreement provides for a term through June 30, 2019 and automatic renewals for additional one-year periods unless and until NextDecade or Mrs. Eisbrenner gives to the other party written notice at least one-hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the applicable renewal date of a decision not to renew for an additional year. On November 30, 2018, the Company gave Mrs. Eisbrenner notice of its decision not to renew the Eisbrenner Agreement.
Under the Eisbrenner Agreement, Mrs. Eisbrenner’s annual base salary is $617,500 and Mrs. Eisbrenner is eligible for an annual bonus with a target of 100%, and a stretch of 160%, of her base salary based upon the achievement of performance targets established by the Board from time to time. The Eisbrenner Agreement provides for a minimum annual bonus payment of $308,750 and a one-time cash bonus of $1.0 million upon the achievement of a Final Investment Decision for a Qualified Project (each as defined in the Eisbrenner Agreement). Furthermore, under the Eisbrenner Agreement, Mrs. Eisbrenner was entitled to Management Incentive Units under the NextDecade Incentive Plan that represented actual (non-voting) equity interests in NextDecade.
On July 24, 2017, Mrs. Eisbrenner received (i) 8,685,633 shares of Company stock in exchange for her vested Management Incentive Units, (ii) 2,072,369 2017 Additional Shares and (iii) 2,035,287 2017 Restricted Shares. 2017 Restricted Shares are subject to (i) transfer and forfeiture restrictions that are substantially similar to the transfer and forfeiture restrictions as were applicable to the exchanged Management Incentive Units and (ii) substantially the same vesting conditions that were provided in the NextDecade Incentive Plan immediately before the closing of transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement. Mrs. Eisbrenner’s 2017 Additional Shares and 2017 Restricted Shares vest upon the Company’s achievement of certain milestones.
The Eisbrenner Agreement also provides that if the Company at any time terminates Mrs. Eisbrenner’s employment without Cause (as defined in the Eisbrenner Agreement), or if Mrs. Eisbrenner voluntarily terminates the Eisbrenner Agreement with Good Reason (as defined in the Eisbrenner Agreement), then Mrs. Eisbrenner shall be entitled to receive (i) a cash payment equal to the sum of her then current base salary for a period of 18 months in a single, lump sum payment, (ii) a pro-rata portion of her annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs and (iii) the full vesting of her 2017 Additional Shares and 2017 Restricted Shares. Moreover, the Eisbrenner Agreement provides that in the event that the Company appoints an individual other than Mrs. Eisbrenner to the position of Chief Executive Officer or to another officer position that reports directly to the Board and does not terminate Mrs. Eisbrenner’s employment for Cause (a “New Executive Event”), then such appointment will not be considered a termination of the Eisbrenner Agreement without Cause, subject to certain provisions. In the event of a termination in connection with a New Executive Event, (i) Mrs. Eisbrenner shall be paid (in addition to any other amounts due in accordance with the terms of the Eisbrenner Agreement) a special bonus equal to the sum of her then current base salary for a period of 18 months in a single, lump sum payment, (ii) the NCGC Committee and the Board shall consider in good faith the acceleration of Mrs. Eisbrenner’s unvested equity to be effective as of her termination date and (iii) todebt financings. To the extent that anywe raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, existing stockholders’ ownership interests will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect their rights as a stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of Common Stock issuedour common stock or other securities in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to Mrs. Eisbrenner are at such time subjectsell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock.
Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation grants our board of directors the power to a lock-up agreement, the Company will releasedesignate and issue additional shares of Common Stock with an aggregate valuecommon and/or preferred stock.
Our authorized capital consists of $25.0 million from any restriction on trading in the lock-up agreement that extends for more than six months. Mrs. Eisbrenner’s role as Chairman of the Board shall not be impacted by a New Executive Event during her initial employment term. As discussed above, on January 23, 2018, the Board appointed Mr. Schatzman, President of the Company, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective February 1, 2018. Mrs. Eisbrenner, Chairman of the Board, continued as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until such date. The appointment of Mr. Schatzman as Chief Executive Officer of the Company resulted in a New Executive Event under the Eisbrenner Agreement and, as a result, the Company released480,000,000 shares of Common Stock with an aggregate valuecommon stock and 1,000,000 shares of $25.0 million from any restriction on trading in the lock-up agreement between the Company and Mrs. Eisbrenner.
The Eisbrenner Agreement also provides that Mrs. Eisbrenner is eligible for health insurance and disability insurance and other customary employee benefits. The Eisbrenner Agreement also contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants and covenants regarding the treatment of confidential information.
11
Overview of Compensation for Benjamin Atkins, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Atkins currently serves as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. There is no employment agreement with Mr. Atkins and his employment is “at will.”
Mr. Atkins’s annual base salary for 2017 was $275,000. Effective April 1, 2018, Mr. Atkins’s annual base salary was increased to $308,000. Mr. Atkins is eligible for an annual bonus with a target of 50% of his annual base salary based upon the achievement of performance targets established by the Board from time to time and a minimum bonus payment of 25% of his base salary.
Mr. Atkins is eligible for health insurance and disability insurance and other customary employee benefits.
Overview of Compensation for Krysta De Lima, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Ms. De Lima currently serves as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company. There is no employment agreement with Ms. De Lima and her employment is “at will.”
Ms. De Lima’s annual base salary for 2017 was $275,000. Effective April 1, 2018, Ms. De Lima’s annual base salary was increased to $308,000. Ms. De Lima is eligible for an annual bonus with a target of 50% of her annual base salary based upon the achievement of performance targets established by the Board from time to time. There is no minimum threshold for any such bonus.
Ms. De Lima is eligible for health insurance and disability insurance and other customary employee benefits.
Termination and Change in Control
The employment agreements of Mr. Schatzman and Ms. Eisbrenner provide for the payment of certain severance benefits upon termination. For additional information about the payment of certain severance benefits upon termination, including in connection with a change of control, please see the overview of compensation for the Company’s named executive officers and the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards Table.
Pension/Retirement Benefits
The Company does not provide a qualified defined benefit pension plan or any non-qualified supplemental executive retirement benefits to any of its executive officers or directors. However, eligible executive officers and directors participate in a defined contribution retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) which allows them to contribute up to 100% of their compensation up to the maximum permitted by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company does not make matching contributions. The 401(k) Plan is sponsored and maintained by the Company.
Additional Benefit Programs
Certain officers and directors are entitled to the following benefits: parking, health insurance, life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment.
12
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2018 YEAR-END
The following table provides information concerning outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2018 granted to the to the Company’s named executive officers.
1843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stock Awards | ||||||
Name |
| Number of shares |
| Market value of shares |
| Equity |
| Equity incentive |
Matthew K. Schatzman |
| 210,498 | (2) | 1,136,689 |
| 841,994 | (3) | 4,546,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen Eisbrenner |
| — |
| — |
| 1,843,267 | (4) | 9,953,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 518,092 | (5) | 2,797,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Atkins |
| — |
| — |
| 466,801 | (6) | 2,520,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 25,473 | (7) | 137,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Krysta De Lima |
| — |
| — |
| 347,108 | (8) | 1,874,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 18,942 | (9) | 102,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
2018 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Board determined that non-employee members of the Board who were not appointed to the Boardpreferred stock. Our preferred stock may be designated into series pursuant to any agreement or arrangement with the Company shall receive annual retention feeauthority granted by our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of $75,000, which is paid in cashIncorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), and in monthly installments. The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to such a memberon approval from our board of the Board during fiscal year 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Fees Earned |
| Stock Awards ($) |
| Total($) |
L. Spencer Wells(1) |
| 115,000 |
| 196,534 | (2) | 311,534 |
|
|
|
|
15
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
On December 15, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2017 Equity Plan and the 2017 Equity Plan became effective by its terms on such date. The purpose of the 2017 Equity Plan is to further align the interests of eligible participants with those of the Company’s stockholders by providing long-term incentive compensation opportunities tied to the performance of the Company and its Common Stock. Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Equity Plan include our employees, non-employee members of the Board, consultants, or other personal service providers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The 2017 Equity Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 5,262,461directors. 166,364 shares of Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments under the 2017 Equity Plan. 2,944,140 awards were granted under the 2017 Equity Plan for fiscal year 2018.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following provides certain aggregate information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans in effectpreferred stock have been designated as of December 31, 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category |
| Number of |
| Weighted Average |
| Number of Securities |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
| — |
| — |
| 2,467,213 |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders |
| 4,477,585 | (1) | — | (2) | — |
Total |
| 4,477,585 |
| — |
| 2,467,213 |
|
|
|
|
16
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our voting securities as of April 9, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Such table is based on information supplied by officers, directors, principal stockholders and the Company’s transfer agent, and information contained in Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC.
Unless otherwise indicated, each person named below has an address in care of our principal executive offices and has sole power to vote and dispose of the shares of voting securities beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares of Common |
| Percentage |
| Shares of |
| Percentage |
| Shares of |
| Percentage |
|
Name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew K. Schatzman |
| 1,192,836 | (1) | 1.1 | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Benjamin Atkins |
| 92,623 |
| * | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Krysta De Lima |
| 68,873 |
| * | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Kathleen Eisbrenner |
| 8,714,132 | (2) | 7.9 | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Avinash Kripalani |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
William Vrattos |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
David Magid |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Matthew Bonanno |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Brian Belke |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
David Gallo |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
L. Spencer Wells |
| 24,085 |
| * | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Eric S. Rosenfeld |
| 1,624,851 | (3) | 1.6 | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Koo Yung Lee |
| — |
| — | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) |
| 11,717,400 |
| 10.6 | % | — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % |
Other 5% Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YCMGA Entities |
| 57,873,196 | (4) | 52.6 | % | 10,944 | (5) | 20.4 | % | — |
| — | % |
Valinor Entities |
| 19,551,334 | (6) | 17.8 | % | 3,749 | (7) | 7.0 | % | — |
| — |
|
Bardin Hill Entities |
| 9,557,346 | (8) | 8.7 | % | 1,809 | (9) | 3.4 | % | — |
| — |
|
HGC NEXT INV LLC |
| — |
| — | % | 38,352 | (10) | 70.5 | % | — |
| — |
|
BlackRock, Inc. |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — | % | 31,455 | (11) | 100.0 | % |
* Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total outstanding Common Stock.
** “Beneficial ownership” is a term broadly defined by the SEC in Rule 13d‑3 under the Exchange Act and includes more than typical forms of stock ownership, that is, stock held in the person’s name. The term also includes what is referred to as “indirect ownership,” meaning ownership of shares as to which a person has or shares investment or voting power. For purposes of this table, shares of Common Stock not outstanding that are subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2019 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by such person, but not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each other person listed.Since the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), the166,364 shares of preferred stock have been designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001
17
per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), and 166,364 shares of preferred stock have been designated as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock” and together with the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, the “Convertible Preferred Stock”), in each case which are convertible into shares of common stock upon the occurrence of certain events. The board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may designate and issue additional shares of preferred stock in such classes or series as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights, subject to the limitations of the Convertible Preferred Stock as further described in the risk factor titled “Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock have certain voting and other rights that may adversely affect holders of our common stock, and the holders of Convertible Preferred Stock may have different interests from and vote their shares in a manner deemed adverse to, holders of our common stock”. The rights of holders of other classes or series of stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock.
The dividend, liquidation, and redemption rights of the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock may adversely affect our financial position and the rights of the holders of our common stock.
At March 22, 2021, we had 67,485 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 64,496 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and 24,990 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding. The shares of Convertible Preferred Stock bear dividends at a rate of 12% per annum, which are cumulative and accrue daily from the date of issuance on the $1,000 stated value. Such dividends are payable quarterly and may be paid in cash or in-kind. No dividends may be paid to holders of our common stock while accumulated dividends remain unpaid on the Convertible Preferred Stock.
Further, we are required, on the earlier of (i) ten (10) business days following a FID Event (as defined in the certificates of designations of the Convertible Preferred Stock) and (ii) the date that is the tenth (10th) anniversary of the closings of the issuances of the Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable, to convert all of the (i) the Series A Preferred Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $7.34 per share of Company common stock and (ii) the Series C Preferred Stock into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $2.96 per share of Company common stock. The conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock would directly dilute the holders of our common stock. In the event we are liquidated while shares of Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding, holders of Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive a preferred liquidation distribution, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends, before holders of our common stock receive any distributions.
Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock have certain voting and other rights that may adversely affect holders of our common stock, and the holders of Convertible Preferred Stock may have different interests from and vote their shares in a manner deemed adverse to, holders of our common stock.
The holders of Convertible Preferred Stock vote on an “as-converted” basis with the holders of our common stock on all matters brought before the holders of our common stock. In addition, prior to the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the consent of the holders of at least a majority of each of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock then outstanding, in each case voting together as a single class, will be required for the Company to take certain actions, including, among others, (i) authorizing, creating or approving the issuance of any shares, or of any security convertible into, or convertible or exchangeable for shares of, senior to the Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) authorizing, creating or approving the issuance of any shares of, or of any security convertible into, or convertible or exchangeable for shares of, Parity Stock (as defined in the certificates of designations of the Convertible Preferred Stock), subject to certain exceptions; (iii) adversely affecting the rights, preferences or privileges of the Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to certain exceptions; (iv) amending, altering or repealing any of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation in a manner that would adversely affect the powers, designations, preferences or rights of the Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable; or (v) amending, altering or repealing any of the provisions of the certificates of designations of the Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable. Further, the holders of Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to purchase their pro rata share of any future issuance of preferred stock of the Company.
The holders of Convertible Preferred Stock may have different interests from the holders of our common stock and could vote their shares in a manner deemed adverse to the holders of our common stock.
Exercise of warrants may have a dilutive effect on our common stock.
As of December 31, 2020, outstanding IPO Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,081,895 shares of our common stock were exercisable in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement governing such warrants. These warrants will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York time, on July 24, 2022 or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. The exercise price of these warrants is $11.50 per one full share of our common stock, subject to certain adjustments.
In addition, we issued warrants together with the Convertible Preferred Stock. The warrants issued together with the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Warrants”) andrepresent the right to acquire in the aggregate a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately 71 basis points (0.71%) of all outstanding shares of Company common stock, measured on a fully diluted basis, on the exercise date with a strike price of $0.01 per share. The warrants issued together with the Series B Preferred Stock (the ““Series B Warrants”) represent the right to acquire in the aggregate a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately 71 basis points (0.71%) of all outstanding shares of Company common stock, measured on a fully diluted basis, on the exercise date with a strike price of $0.01 per share. The warrants issued together with the Series C Preferred Stock (the “Series C Warrants” and, together with the Series A Warrants and the Series B Warrants,” the “Common Stock Warrants”) are not convertible into, or exercisable for,represent the right to acquire in the aggregate a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately 35 basis points (0.35%) of all outstanding shares of Company common stock, measured on a fully diluted basis, on the exercise date with a strike price of $0.01 per share.
The Common Stock within 60 daysWarrants have a fixed three-year term that commenced on the closings of April 9, 2019,the issuances of the associated Convertible Preferred Stock. The Common Stock Warrants may only be exercised by holders of the Common Stock Warrants at the expiration of such three-year term, except that the Company can force the exercise of the Common Stock Warrants prior to expiration of such term if the volume weighted average trading price of shares of Commoncommon stock for each trading day during any 60 of the prior 90 trading days is equal to or greater than 175% of the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock issuable uponand Series B Preferred Stock and, with respect to the Series B Warrants and Series C Warrants, the Company simultaneously elects to force a mandatory exercise of all other warrants then outstanding and un-exercised and held by any holder of parity stock.
To the extent the IPO Warrants are exercised, or the warrants issued together with the Convertible Preferred Stock are exercised, additional shares of our common stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of our common stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such conversionshares in the public market or exercise are not reflected as beneficially ownedthe fact that such warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions of our charter documents or Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent us from being acquired even if being acquired would be beneficial to our stockholders and could make it more difficult to change management.
Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders might otherwise consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult to replace or remove our board of directors. Among other things, these provisions include:
• | elimination of our stockholders’ ability to call special meetings of stockholders; |
• | elimination of our stockholders’ ability to act by written consent; |
• | an advance notice requirement for stockholder proposals and nominations for members of our board of directors; |
• | a classified board of directors, the members of which serve staggered three-year terms; |
• | the express authority of our board of directors to make, alter or repeal the Bylaws; |
• | the authority of our board of directors to determine the number of director seats on our board of directors; and |
• | the authority of our board of directors to issue preferred stock with such terms as it may determine. |
In addition, the Certificate of Incorporation provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any claims, including (i) any derivative actions or proceedings brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by, or any wrongdoing by, a director, officer or employee or (iii) any action asserting a claim pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the respective principalinternal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision that is contained in the Certificate of Incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
We currently lease approximately 25,600 square feet of office space for general and administrative purposes in Houston, Texas under a lease agreement that expires on September 30, 2021.
In January 2017, NextDecade LLC executed surface lease agreements with the City of Texas City and the State of Texas for a 994-acre site for a potential second U.S. LNG project (collectively, the “Galveston Bay Leases”). The Galveston Bay Leases expired on December 31, 2020.
On March 6, 2019, Rio Grande entered into a lease agreement (the “Rio Grande Site Lease”) with the Brownsville Navigation District of Cameron County, Texas (“BND”) pursuant to which we have agreed to lease approximately 984 acres of land situated in Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas for the purposes of constructing, operating, and maintaining the Terminal and gas treatment and gas pipeline facilities. The initial term of the Rio Grande Site Lease is for 30 years (the “Primary Term”), which will commence on the date specified in a written notice by us to BND. We have the option to renew and extend the term of the Rio Grande Site Lease beyond the Primary Term for up to two consecutive renewal periods of ten years each provided that it has not caused an event of default under the Rio Grande Site Lease.
We do not own or lease any other real property that is materially important to our business. We believe that our current properties are adequate for our current needs and that additional office space will be available when and as needed.
None.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information, Holders and Dividends
Our common stock trades on Nasdaq under the symbol “NEXT.” The IPO Warrants trade on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “NEXTW.”
As of March 18, 2021, 122.2 million shares of Company common stock were outstanding held by approximately 69 record owners. All shares of Company common stock held in street name are recorded in our stock register as being held by one stockholder.
We currently intend to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on Company common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future change in our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors in light of our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings, prospects and any restrictions under any financing agreements, as well as other factors it deems relevant.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table above.summarizes stock repurchases for the three months ended December 31, 2020:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid Per Share (2) | Total Number of Shares Purchased as a Part of Publicly Announced Plans | Maximum Number of Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans | ||||||||||||
October 2020 | 3,525 | $ | 2.59 | — | — | |||||||||||
November 2020 | — | $ | — | — | — | |||||||||||
December 2020 | 4,870 | $ | 2.40 | — | — |
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
Company common stock from the participants under the 2017 Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis presents management’s view of our business, financial condition and overall performance and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” This information is intended to provide investors with an understanding of our past performance, current financial condition and outlook for the future. Our discussion and analysis include the following subjects:
• |
|
• | Overview of Significant Events |
• |
|
• |
|
• | Results of Operations |
• |
|
• |
|
• | Recent Accounting Standards |
Overview of Business
We are a LNG development company focused on LNG export projects in the State of Texas. We have focused and continue to focus our development activities on the Terminal and have undertaken and continue to undertake various initiatives to design and engineer the Terminal that we expect will result in demand for contracted capacity at the Terminal, which would allow us to seek construction financing to develop the Terminal. We believe the Terminal possesses competitive advantages in several important areas, including, engineering, commercial, regulatory, and gas supply. We submitted a pre-filing request for the Terminal to the FERC in March 2015 and filed a formal application with the FERC in May 2016. In November 2019, the FERC issued an order authorizing the siting, construction and operation of the Terminal. We also believe we have robust commercial offtake and gas supply strategies in place.
Overview of Significant Events
Carbon-Neutrality at the Terminal
On March 18, 2021, we announced the formation of NEXT Carbon Solutions, LLC (“NEXT Carbon Solutions”), a wholly owned subsidiary of NextDecade that is expected to:
• |
|
• | advance proprietary processes to |
• | help other energy companies to reduce their greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions associated with the production, transportation, and |
• | generate high-quality, verifiable carbon offsets to support companies in |
19
NEXT Carbon Solutions’ CCS project is expected to reduce permitted CO2 emissions at the Terminal by more than 90 percent without major design changes to the Terminal. As a result, the Terminal is expected to be the greenest LNG project in the world.
We are working with sustainable Permian and Eagle Ford producers seeking to supply responsibly sourced natural gas to the Terminal. Combining responsibly sourced natural gas with the anticipated CO2 emissions reduction associated with our CCS project is expected to enable the Terminal to produce the lowest lifecycle GHG LNG on an FOB basis and to be the greenest LNG project in the world.
To realize the significant benefits associated with co-development of the Terminal and the CCS project, we anticipate achieving FID on a minimum of two trains at the Terminal in 2021 and FID on the CCS project soon after FID at the Terminal.
Terminal Optimization
The original front-end engineering and design for the Terminal was based on six LNG trains capable of producing 27 mtpa of LNG for export. The technologies that were selected and filed with the FERC in 2015 and 2016 have evolved over the five-year permitting period; the LNG trains are now more efficient and will produce more LNG with lower total CO2e emissions. Multiple optimizations have been identified that will lead to the delivery of a LNG project capable of producing 27 mtpa with just five LNG trains instead of six.
We expect these optimizations to result in several environmental and community benefits when compared with our original six-train project, including (i) approximately 21 percent lower CO2e emissions, (ii) shortened construction timeline for the full 27 mtpa project, (iii) reduced facility footprint, and (iv) an expected reduction in traffic on roadways.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
The Board adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy on October 10, 2017, which addressesOn August 13, 2020, the reporting, review and approval or ratification of transactions with related persons. Although related person transactions can involve potential or actual conflicts of interest,FERC approved the Company recognizes that such transactions may occur in the normal course of business or provide an opportunity that is in the best interestschange of the Company. The Related Person Transaction Policy is not designeddesign for the Terminal from six trains to prohibit related person transactions; rather, it isfive trains. On October 9, 2020, the FERC issued a notice of denial of rehearing for such approval in regards to providechallenges to its approval of the design change.
Any future development of Train 6 will require us to secure authorization from the FERC, the DOE, and any other relevant federal or state agency with jurisdiction over the export project.
LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement
In March 2019, we entered into the SPA with Shell for timely internal reviewthe supply of prospective transactions, approval or ratificationapproximately two mtpa of transactions and appropriate oversight and public disclosure of transactions.
liquefied natural gas from the Terminal. Pursuant to the Related Person Transaction Policy, any transactionSPA, Shell will purchase LNG on a FOB basis starting from the date the first liquefaction train of the Terminal that is commercially operable, with approximately three-quarters of the purchased LNG volume indexed to Brent and the remaining volume indexed to domestic United States gas indices, including Henry Hub.
In the first quarter of 2020, the SPA became effective upon the conditions precedent in the SPA being satisfied or arrangement orwaived. The SPA obligates Rio Grande to deliver the contracted volumes of LNG to Shell at the FOB delivery point, subject to the first liquefaction train at the Terminal being commercially operable.
Rio Grande Site Lease
On March 6, 2019, Rio Grande entered into the Rio Grande Site Lease for the purposes of constructing, operating and maintaining the Terminal and gas treatment and gas pipeline facilities. The Primary Term will commence on the date specified in a written notice by us to BND. We have the option to renew and extend the term of the Rio Grande Site Lease beyond the Primary Term for up to two consecutive renewal periods of ten years each provided that it has not caused an event of default under the Rio Grande Site Lease.
On January 27, 2020, the City of Port Isabel, Texas and other parties filed a lawsuit in state court in Cameron County against the BND seeking to enjoin the federally-authorized siting, construction, and operation of LNG terminals on land owned by the BND. On August 5, 2020, the state court dismissed the lawsuit.
On April 30, 2020, Rio Grande and the BND amended the Rio Grande Site Lease (the “Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment”) to extend the effective date for commencing the Rio Grande Site Lease to May 6, 2021 (the “Effective Date”). The Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment further provides that Rio Grande has the right, exercisable in its sole discretion, to extend the Effective Date to May 6, 2022 by providing the BND with written notice of its election no later than the close of business on the Effective Date.
Extension of Contract Validity of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Contract
During the third quarter of 2018, we initiated a competitive EPC bid process. We received EOIs from multiple EPC contractors to participate in the EPC process. We reviewed the EOIs against a series of transactions or arrangements between the Company, any subsidiaryselection criteria and issued formal invitations to bid to Bechtel , Fluor and McDermott. In December 2018, each of the EPC bidders provided us with an endorsement of the Terminal’s FEED, which indicates the bidders’ confirmation that the Terminal is technically feasible and can be further designed, engineered, permitted, constructed, commissioned and safely placed into operations.
On April 22, 2019, we received EPC bid packages from each of Bechtel and Fluor, two of the global LNG market’s leading EPC contractors. The technical and commercial bid packages, which were received on-schedule, were for LSTK EPC contracts for the Terminal.
On May 24, 2019, Rio Grande entered into the EPC Agreements. We agreed to pay to Bechtel a contract price of $7.042 billion for the work under the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement and a contract price of $2.323 billion for the work under the Train 3 EPC Agreement. In each of 2020 and 2019, we issued two limited notices to proceed to Bechtel under the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement.
On October 1, 2019, we issued 2,119,728 shares of Company or anycommon stock to BDC Oil and Gas Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Bechtel. The shares of Company common stock were issued in lieu of a cash payment of $15 million for amounts invoiced by Bechtel pursuant to the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement.
As previously disclosed, Rio Grande and Bechtel completed a contract price refresh on the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement and the Train 3 EPC Agreement resulting in no changes to the contract prices and such contract prices are now valid until December 31, 2021.
By amendment dated March 5, 2021, Rio Grande and Bechtel amended the Trains 1 and 2 EPC Agreement to extend the contract validity to July 31, 2022. By amendment dated March 5, 2021, Rio Grande and Bechtel amended the Train 3 EPC Agreement to extend the contract validity to July 31, 2022.
FERC Order for Terminal
On November 22, 2019, FERC issued an order authorizing the siting, construction and operation of the Terminal. Following receipt of the Final Order from FERC two requests for re-hearing were filed. One of those requests for rehearing also requested that the FERC stay its Final Order. On January 22, 2020, the FERC issued an order extending the time by which it would respond to these requests for rehearing. On January 23, 2020, the FERC issued its Order on Rehearing and Stay, by which FERC denied all re-hearings and requests for stay. The parties who filed the requests for re-hearing have petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the FERC Order and the FERC order denying rehearing, and that appeal is still pending. Similar appeals are also pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in respect of other company controlledpermits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Export of LNG to Non-FTA countries
On September 7, 2016, Rio Grande obtained an authorization for export of LNG to countries with which the U.S. has a FTA on our own behalf and as an agent for others for a term of 30 years. On February 10, 2020, the DOE issued an order granting authorization to export LNG from the Terminal to non-FTA countries.
Sale of Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, participates, whether or notLLC
On March 2, 2020, NextDecade LLC closed the Companytransactions (the “Closing”) contemplated by that certain Omnibus Agreement, dated February 13, 2020, with Buyer, pursuant to which NextDecade LLC sold one hundred percent of the Equity Interests in Rio Bravo to Buyer in consideration of approximately $19.4 million. Buyer paid $15.0 million of the purchase price to NextDecade LLC at the Closing and the remainder will be paid within five business days after the date that Rio Grande has received, after a final positive investment decision, the initial funding of financing for the development, construction and operation of the Terminal. In connection with the Closing, Rio Grande Gas Supply entered into (i) a Precedent Agreement for Firm Natural Gas Transportation Service for the Rio Bravo Pipeline (the “RBPL Precedent Agreement”) with Rio Bravo and (ii) a Precedent Agreement for Natural Gas Transportation Service (the “VCP Precedent Agreement”) with VCP. VCP and Rio Bravo are wholly owned subsidiaries of Enbridge. The Valley Crossing Pipeline is a party, owned and a “related person” in which such person will have a material direct or indirect interest must be submittedoperated by VCP.
Pursuant to the independent directorsRBPL Precedent Agreement, Rio Bravo agreed to provide Rio Grande Gas Supply with firm natural gas transportation services on the Pipeline in a quantity sufficient to match the full operational capacity of each proposed liquefaction train of the BoardTerminal. Rio Bravo’s obligation to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Pipeline is conditioned on its receipt, no later than December 31, 2023, of notice that Rio Grande Gas Supply or its affiliate has issued a full notice to proceed to the engineering, procurement and construction contractor (the “EPC Contractor”) for review, approval or ratification. A “related person” means any director, director nominee or executive officerthe construction of the Company, any holderTerminal. Under the RBPL Precedent Agreement, in consideration for the provision of more than 5%such firm transportation services, Rio Bravo will be remunerated on a dollar-per-dekatherm, take-or-pay basis, subject to certain adjustments, over a term of at least twenty years, all in compliance with the federal and state authorizations associated with the Pipeline.
Pursuant to the VCP Precedent Agreement, VCP agreed to provide Rio Grande Gas Supply with natural gas transportation services on the Valley Crossing Pipeline in a quantity sufficient to match the commissioning requirements of each proposed liquefaction train of the outstanding voting securitiesTerminal. VCP’s obligation to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the necessary interconnection to the Terminal and the Pipeline is conditioned on its receipt, no later than December 31, 2023, of notice that Rio Grande Gas Supply or its affiliate has issued a full notice to proceed to the EPC Contractor for the construction of the Company, or any immediate family memberTerminal. VCP will be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the tap, riser and valve facilities (the “VCP Transporter Facilities”), which shall connect to Rio Grande Gas Supply’s custody transfer meter and such other facilities as necessary in order for the Terminal to receive gas from the VCP Transporter Facilities (the “Rio Grande Gas Supply Facilities”). Rio Grande Gas Supply will be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Rio Grande Gas Supply Facilities. Under the VCP Precedent Agreement, in consideration for the provision of the foregoing persons.
The independent directorscommissioning transportation services, VCP will be remunerated on the same dollar-per-dekatherm, take-or-pay basis as set forth in the RBPL Precedent Agreement for the duration of the Board will considersuch commissioning services, all relevant factors when determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, including whether such transaction is in or not inconsistentcompliance with the best interests offederal and state authorizations associated with the Company, and whether such transaction is comparableValley Crossing Pipeline.
If Rio Grande or its affiliate fail to issue a transaction that could be available on an arms-length basis or is on terms that the Company offers generallyfull notice to persons who are not related persons and whether such transaction. Specific types of transactions are excluded from the Related Person Transaction Policy, such as, for example, transactions in which the related person’s interest arises solely from his or her service as a director of, or direct or indirect ownership of less than a ten percent (10%) equity interest in, another entity that is a partyproceed to the transaction.EPC Contractor on or prior to December 31, 2023, Buyer has the right to sell the Equity Interests back to NextDecade LLC and NextDecade LLC has the right to repurchase the Equity Interests from Buyer, in each case at a price not to exceed $23 million.
In addition to the Related Person Transaction Policy, the Code of Conduct requires that conflicts of interests involving persons other than directors, director nominees and executive officers must be approved by the Operations Committee.
The following is a discussion of transactions between the Company and its executive officers, directors and stockholders owning 5% or more of the Company’s common stock.
Series AC Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements
On August 3, 2018, the Company
As previously disclosed, we entered into a Series AC Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the(collectively, the “Series A PreferredC Stock Purchase Agreements”) with each of (i) YCMGA,York Capital Management, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (“York”), (ii) certain affiliates of Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP (“Bardin Hill”), and (iii) Avenue Energy Opportunities Fund II, L.P (“Avenue” and together with York and Bardin Hill, the “Purchasers”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell, and the Purchasers agreed to purchase shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), together with associated warrants, for an aggregate purchase price of $24.5 million. The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Series C Stock Purchase Agreements occurred at multiple closings on or prior to March 22, 2021.
For additional details on the Series C Stock Purchase Agreements and the transactions in connection therewith, please refer to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2021.
COVID-19 Pandemic and its Effect on our Business
The business environment in which we operate has been impacted by the recent downturn in the energy market as well as the outbreak of COVID-19 and its progression into a pandemic in March 2020. We have modified and may continue to modify certain business and workforce practices to protect the safety and welfare of our employees. Furthermore, we have implemented and may continue to implement certain mitigation efforts to ensure business continuity. We will continue to actively monitor the situation and may take further actions altering our business operations that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and stakeholders, or as required by federal, state, or local authorities. It is not clear what the potential effects any such alterations or modifications may have on our business, including the effects on our customers, employees, and prospects, or on our financial results beyond 2020.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
We have funded and continue to fund the development of the Terminal and general working capital needs through our cash on hand and proceeds from the issuances of equity and equity-based securities. Since January 2019, capital raising events have included the following:
In May 2019, we sold an aggregate of 20,945 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, at $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $20.945 million to York Tactical Energy Fund, L.P. and York Tactical Energy Fund PIV-AN, L.P., (ii) Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP (formerly known as Halcyon Capital Management LP), severally on behalf of certain funds or accounts managed by it or its affiliates, (the “YCMGA Purchasers”)(iii) Valinor Management, L.P., (ii) Valinor, severally on behalf of certain funds or accounts for which it is investment manager (the “Valinor Purchasers”(“Valinor”), and (iv) HGC NEXT INV LLC. Series B Warrants were issued together with such shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
In October 2019, we sold an aggregate of 7,974,482 shares of Company common stock at $6.27 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million to Ninteenth Investment Company LLC.
In March 2021, we sold an aggregate of 24,500 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $24.5 million to the Series C Purchasers together with associated warrants.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table summarizes the sources and uses of our cash for the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Operating cash flows | $ | (26,253 | ) | $ | (40,700 | ) | ||
Investing cash flows | 18,521 | (16,693 | ) | |||||
Financing cash flows | 14,604 | 69,960 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 6,872 | 12,567 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period | 15,736 | 3,169 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period | $ | 22,608 | $ | 15,736 |
Operating Cash Flows
Operating cash outflows during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $26.3 million and $40.7 million, respectively. The decrease in operating cash outflows in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily related to the decrease in invitation to bid contract costs of $10.2 million and a decrease in general and administrative costs of $2.5 million.
Investing Cash Flows
Investing cash inflows during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $18.5 million and investing cash outflows during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $16.7 million. The investing cash inflows in 2020 were primarily the result of the sale of investment securities of $62.0 million partially offset by cash used in the development of the Terminal of $32.4 million and cash used in the acquisition of other assets of $10.9 million. The investing cash outflows in 2019 were the result of cash used in the development of the Terminal and the Pipeline of $27.2 million and a net redemption of $10.5 million in investment securities.
Financing Cash Flows
Financing cash inflows during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $14.6 million and $70.0 million, respectively. Financing cash inflows in 2020 were primarily the result of proceeds from the sale of Rio Bravo of $15.0 million. Financing cash inflows in 2019 were the result of $71.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of preferred and common equity offset by $0.3 million of equity issuance costs and $0.7 million of shares repurchased related to share based compensation.
Pre-FID Liquidity
In 2020, we incurred approximately $67 million on pre-FID development activities in support of the Terminal. To preserve pre-FID liquidity, we have implemented certain measures to manage costs:
• | Since December 31, 2019, full-time headcount has decreased 38 percent. |
• | Our Chief Executive Officer and certain other members of our executive team voluntarily reduced their base salaries by ten percent during 2020. |
• | We and Bechtel have agreed to a limited scope of ongoing work which will provide for continued engineering progress for the Terminal. |
• | We have reduced our office space under lease and deferred additional information technology spending until FID is achieved. |
We expect pre-FID development spending to average approximately $3 million per month through year-end 2021. We believe that the measures taken to manage costs will not negatively affect our ability to successfully deliver the Terminal and will create value for stockholders.
Capital Development Activities
We are primarily engaged in developing the Terminal, which may require additional capital to support further project development, engineering, regulatory approvals and compliance, and commercial activities in advance of a FID made to finance and construct the Terminal. Even if successfully completed, the Terminal will not begin to operate and generate significant cash flows until at least several years from now. Construction of the Terminal would not begin until, among other requirements for project financing, all required federal, state and local permits have been obtained. As a result, our business success will depend, to a significant extent, upon our ability to obtain the funding necessary to construct the Terminal, to bring it into operation on a commercially viable basis and to finance our staffing, operating and expansion costs during that process.
We have engaged SG Americas Securities, LLC (a business unit of Société Générale) and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. to advise and assist us in raising capital for post-FID construction activities.
We currently expect that the long-term capital requirements for the Terminal will be financed predominately through project financing and proceeds from future debt, equity-based, and equity offerings by us. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in securing additional debt and/or equity financing in the future to complete the Terminal or, if successful, that the capital we raise will not be expensive or dilutive to stockholders. Additionally, if these types of financing are not available, we will be required to seek alternative sources of financing, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Contractual Obligations
We are committed to make cash payments in the future pursuant to certain of our contracts. The following table summarizes certain contractual obligations (in thousands) in place as of December 31, 2020:
Total | 2021 | 2022-2023 | 2024-2025 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 2,685 | $ | 2,685 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Other | 85 | 53 | 32 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,770 | $ | 2,738 | $ | 32 | $ | — | $ | — |
Operating lease obligations primarily relate to our Rio Grande Site Lease and office space in Houston, Texas.
A discussion of these obligations can be found at — Note 7 – Leases and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes costs, expenses and other income for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):
Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | Change | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 20,213 | 22,548 | (2,335 | ) | ||||||||
Invitation to Bid Contract Costs | — | 10,163 | (10,163 | ) | ||||||||
Land option and lease expenses | 1,603 | 2,039 | (436 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation expense | 196 | 251 | (55 | ) | ||||||||
Operating loss | (22,012 | ) | (35,001 | ) | 12,989 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on Common Stock Warrant Liabilities | 7,870 | (2,657 | ) | 10,527 | ||||||||
Loss on redemption of investment securities | (412 | ) | — | (412 | ) | |||||||
Interest income, net | 243 | 1,718 | (1,475 | ) | ||||||||
Other | (18 | ) | 69 | (87 | ) | |||||||
Net loss attributable to NextDecade Corporation | (14,329 | ) | (35,871 | ) | 21,542 | |||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (14,327 | ) | (11,164 | ) | (3,163 | ) | ||||||
Deemed dividends on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | (128 | ) | (1,517 | ) | 1,389 | |||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (28,784 | ) | $ | (48,552 | ) | $ | 19,768 |
Our consolidated net loss was $14.3 million, or $0.24 per common share (basic and diluted), for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to a net loss of $35.9 million, or $0.45 per common share (basic and diluted), for the year ended December 31, 2019. The $21.5 million decrease in net loss was primarily a result of a decrease in invitation to bid contract costs, a decrease in general and administrative expense and an increase in the gain on common stock warrant liabilities, partially offset by a decrease in interest income, discussed separately below.
General and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased $2.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, due primarily to decreases in salaries and wages, professional fees, office expenses, travel expenses and marketing and conference sponsorship costs of $11.7 million, partially offset by an increase in share-based compensation expense of $9.3 million. The increase in share-based compensation expense is primarily a result of forfeitures of restricted stock during the year ended December 31, 2019.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no invitation to bid contract costs compared to approximately $10.2 million incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in invitation to bid contract costs is due to the conclusion of the competitive EPC bid process.
The gain on Common Stock Warrant Liabilities of approximately $7.9 million in 2020 was primarily due to a decrease in the price of common stock from $6.14 per share at December 31, 2019 to $2.09 per share at December 31, 2020.
Interest income, net during the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased $1.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 due to lower average balances maintained in our cash, cash equivalent and investment securities accounts.
Preferred stock dividends of $14.3 million in 2020 consisted of dividends paid-in-kind with the issuance of an additional 7,310 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 6,967 additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
Deemed dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock for the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 represents the accretion of the beneficial conversion feature associated with the Series A Preferred Stock issued in 2018.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2020.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, including those related to the value of properties, plant, and equipment, share-based compensation, Common Stock Warrant liabilities, and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates, and actual results may differ from these estimates. Management considers the following to be its most critical accounting estimates that involve significant judgment.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
A long-lived asset, including an intangible asset, is evaluated for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability generally is determined by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the expected undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the amount of impairment loss is measured as the excess, if any, of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value. We use a variety of fair value measurement techniques when market information for the same or similar assets does not exist. Projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from results. Management reviews its estimates of cash flows on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic and commodity price environment.
Share-based Compensation
The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
For additional information regarding our share-based compensation, see Note 12 – Share-based Compensation of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Valuation of Common Stock Warrant Liabilities
The fair value of Common Stock Warrant liabilities is determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of Common Stock Warrant requires considerable judgment. Any change in the estimates used may cause the value to be higher or lower than that reported. The estimated volatility of our common stock at the date of issuance, and at each subsequent reporting period, is based on our historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on rates published by the government for bonds with maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the Common Stock Warrants at the valuation date. The expected life of the Common Stock Warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term.
The Common Stock Warrants are not traded in an active market and the fair value is determined using valuation techniques. The estimates may be significantly different from those recorded in the consolidated financial statements because of the use of judgment and the inherent uncertainty in estimating the fair value of these instruments that are not quoted in an active market. All changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations each reporting period.
For additional information regarding the valuation of Common Stock Warrant liabilities, see Note 10 – Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
Provisions for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the current period’s provision for income taxes. We routinely assess our deferred tax assets and reduce such assets by a valuation allowance if we deem it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment requires significant judgment and is based upon our assessment of our ability to generate future taxable income among other factors.
Recent Accounting Standards
For descriptions of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 15 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not required to provide the information under this item.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
NextDecade Corporation
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NextDecade Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, series A and series B convertible preferred stock, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical audit matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of common stock warrant liabilities
As described further in Note 10 to the financial statements, the Company had $4.2 million of common stock warrant liabilities as of December 31, 2020. At each balance sheet date, management determines the estimated fair value of common stock warrant liabilities using a Monte Carlo valuation method. The following qualitative information is used by management to determine the fair value measurement of the common stock warrant liabilities: stock price, exercise price, risk-free rate, volatility, and the warrants term in years, among other inputs. We identified the valuation of common stock warrant liabilities as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the valuation of common stock warrant liabilities is a critical audit matter are that (i) there was significant judgment by management when determining the estimated volatility, risk-free interest rate, and the expected life of the common stock warrants, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of common stock warrant liabilities included the following, among others.
● | We tested the design of controls over the valuation of common stock warrant liabilities and gained an understanding of the valuation credentials and industry expertise of the third-party valuation group and valuation methodologies used. |
● | We tested the schedule of fully dilutive shares used to value common stock warrants by confirming outstanding common stock with the third-party transfer agent and testing the conversion value of preferred stock and dividend issuances. |
● | With the assistance of Grant Thornton internal valuation specialists, we tested management’s and the third-party’s process for determining the fair value of common stock warrants, including evaluating significant assumptions used, testing supporting documents, and assessing reasonableness by comparing to historical trends and industry expectations. Certain key inputs/assumptions tested by us included the following: |
o | Volatility |
o | Risk-free interest rate |
o | Warrant terms |
Sale of Rio Bravo accounting treatment
As described further in Note 5 to the financial statements, on March 2, 2020, the Company completed the sale of Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC (“Rio Bravo”) to Spectra Energy Transmission II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge, Inc ("Enbridge"). In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into a precedent agreement where Rio Bravo agreed to provide the Company with firm natural gas transportation services on the proposed interstate natural gas pipeline in a quantity sufficient to match the full operational capacity of each proposed liquefaction train of the liquefied natural gas terminal. Additionally, if the Company fails to issue a full notice to proceed to the terminal contractor on or prior to December 31, 2023, Enbridge has the right to sell the equity interests back to the Company, and the Company has the right to repurchase the equity interests from Enbridge. Due to the aforementioned terms of the agreement, the proceeds from the sale of the equity interests and additional costs incurred by Enbridge are presented as a non-current liability and the assets of Rio Bravo have not been de-recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2020. We identified the sale of Rio Bravo accounting treatment as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the sale of Rio Bravo accounting treatment is a critical audit matter are (i) the complexity of the terms of the sale agreement, (ii) the complexity and judgment involved in the determination of the applicable accounting authoritative guidance, and (iii) Bardin Hill,the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.
Our audit procedures related to the sale of Rio Bravo accounting treatment included the following, among others.
● | Weread the sale agreement. |
● | Wetested management’s process for concluding on the accounting treatment of the sale of the equity interest in Rio Bravo, including management’s assumptions used to determine the accounting treatment in accordance with the sale agreement. |
● | We used our firm specialist resources to assist in auditing management’s conclusions through an accounting consultation. |
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.
Houston, Texas
March 25, 2021
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 22,608 | $ | 15,736 | ||||
Investment securities | 0 | 62,207 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 670 | 859 | ||||||
Total current assets | 23,278 | 78,802 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 161,662 | 134,591 | ||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 429 | 1,054 | ||||||
Other non current assets | 16,299 | 6,748 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 201,668 | $ | 221,195 | ||||
Liabilities, Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 207 | $ | 11,912 | ||||
Share-based compensation liability | 182 | 182 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | 1,032 | 8,751 | ||||||
Current Common Stock Warrant liabilities | 3,290 | 0 | ||||||
Current operating lease liabilities | 432 | 698 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 5,143 | 21,543 | ||||||
Non-current Common Stock Warrant liabilities | 874 | 12,034 | ||||||
Non-current operating lease liabilities | 0 | 3 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 22,916 | 0 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 28,933 | 33,580 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) | ||||||||
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 per share liquidation preference, Issued and outstanding: 65,507 shares and 58,197 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 55,522 | 48,084 | ||||||
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 per share liquidation preference, Issued and outstanding: 62,612 shares and 55,645 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 56,781 | 49,814 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value Authorized: 480.0 million shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Issued and outstanding: 117.8 million shares and 117.3 million shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 12 | 12 | ||||||
Treasury stock: 249,742 shares and 137,860 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, at cost | (1,031 | ) | (685 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value Authorized: 0.9 million, after designation of the Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Issued and outstanding: none at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 209,481 | 224,091 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (148,030 | ) | (133,701 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 60,432 | 89,717 | ||||||
Total liabilities, Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and stockholders’ equity | $ | 201,668 | $ | 221,195 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 20,213 | 22,548 | ||||||
Invitation to Bid Contract Costs | 0 | 10,163 | ||||||
Land option and lease expenses | 1,603 | 2,039 | ||||||
Depreciation expense | 196 | 251 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 22,012 | 35,001 | ||||||
Total operating loss | (22,012 | ) | (35,001 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on Common Stock Warrant liabilities | 7,870 | (2,657 | ) | |||||
Loss on redemption of investment securities | (412 | ) | 0 | |||||
Interest income, net | 243 | 1,718 | ||||||
Other | (18 | ) | 69 | |||||
Total other income | 7,683 | (870 | ) | |||||
Net loss attributable to NextDecade Corporation | (14,329 | ) | (35,871 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends | (14,327 | ) | (11,164 | ) | ||||
Deemed dividends on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | (128 | ) | (1,517 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (28,784 | ) | $ | (48,552 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 117,524 | 109,057 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(in thousands)
Common Stock | Treasury Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Additional | Total | Series A | Series B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Paid-in | Accumulated | Stockholders’ | Convertible | Convertible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Equity | Preferred Stock | Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2019 | 106,856 | $ | 11 | 6 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 180,862 | $ | (97,617 | ) | $ | 83,221 | $ | 40,091 | $ | 26,159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASC Topic 842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (213 | ) | (213 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASU 2018-07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,116 | 0 | 2,116 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | 0 | — | 0 | (8,525 | ) | 0 | (8,525 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock vesting | 510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 495 | 0 | 495 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock net of equity issuance costs | 10,094 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 61,824 | 0 | 61,825 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased related to share-based compensation | (131 | ) | 0 | 131 | (650 | ) | 0 | 0 | (650 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series B preferred stock | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19,009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | — | 0 | — | 0 | (11,164 | ) | 0 | (11,164 | ) | 6,476 | 4,646 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividends - accretion of beneficial conversion feature | — | 0 | — | 0 | (1,517 | ) | 0 | (1,517 | ) | 1,517 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | (35,871 | ) | (35,871 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | 117,329 | $ | 12 | 137 | $ | (685 | ) | $ | 224,091 | $ | (133,701 | ) | $ | 89,717 | $ | 48,084 | $ | 49,814 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | 0 | — | 0 | (155 | ) | 0 | (155 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock vesting | 612 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased related to share-based compensation | (112 | ) | 0 | 112 | (346 | ) | 0 | 0 | (346 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | — | 0 | — | 0 | (14,327 | ) | 0 | (14,327 | ) | 7,310 | 6,967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividends - accretion of beneficial conversion feature | — | 0 | — | 0 | (128 | ) | 0 | (128 | ) | 128 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | (14,329 | ) | (14,329 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020 | 117,829 | $ | 12 | 249 | $ | (1,031 | ) | $ | 209,481 | $ | (148,030 | ) | $ | 60,432 | $ | 55,522 | $ | 56,781 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to NextDecade Corporation | $ | (14,329 | ) | $ | (35,871 | ) | ||
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities | ||||||||
Depreciation | 196 | 251 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense | (341 | ) | (9,646 | ) | ||||
(Gain) loss on Common Stock Warrant liabilities | (7,870 | ) | 2,657 | |||||
Gain on investment securities | 0 | (100 | ) | |||||
Realized loss (gain) on investment securities | 423 | (138 | ) | |||||
Amortization of right-of-use assets | 1,230 | 955 | ||||||
Amortization of other non-current assets | 1,360 | 127 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 191 | 573 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (370 | ) | 207 | |||||
Operating lease liabilities | (874 | ) | (1,624 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (5,869 | ) | 1,909 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (26,253 | ) | (40,700 | ) | ||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | (32,352 | ) | (20,303 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of other non-current assets | (10,911 | ) | (6,875 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities | 61,972 | 77,000 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities | (188 | ) | (66,515 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 18,521 | (16,693 | ) | |||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC | 15,000 | 0 | ||||||
Proceeds from equity issuance | 0 | 70,945 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (50 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Equity issuance costs | 0 | (293 | ) | |||||
Shares repurchased related to share-based compensation | (346 | ) | (650 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 14,604 | 69,960 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 6,872 | 12,567 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period | 15,736 | 3,169 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period | $ | 22,608 | $ | 15,736 | ||||
Non-cash investing activities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable for acquisition of property, plant and equipment | $ | 16 | $ | 11,351 | ||||
Accrued liabilities for acquisition of property, plant and equipment | 650 | 2,503 | ||||||
Pipeline assets obtained in exchange for other non-current liabilities | 7,916 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock issued in lieu of cash | 0 | 12,082 | ||||||
Non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||
Paid-in-kind dividends on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | 14,277 | 11,122 | ||||||
Accretion of deemed dividends on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | 128 | 1,517 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 — Background and Basis of Presentation
NextDecade Corporation engages in development activities related to the liquefaction and sale of liquefied natural gas (“LNG”). We have focused and continue to focus our development activities on the Rio Grande LNG terminal facility at the Port of Brownsville in southern Texas (the “Terminal”).
Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note 2— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, including those related to the value of property, plant and equipment, income taxes including valuation allowances for net deferred tax assets, share-based compensation and fair value measurements. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates, and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We maintain cash balances with a single financial institution, which may at times be in excess of federally insured levels. We have not incurred losses related to these cash and cash equivalent balances to date.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investment Securities
We define investment securities as investments in marketable securities that can be readily converted to cash. We determine the appropriate classification of investment securities at the time of purchase and reevaluate such classification at each balance sheet date. Investment securities are initially recorded at cost and remeasured to fair value, with changes presented in other income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Generally, we begin to capitalize the costs of our development projects once construction of the individual project is probable. This assessment includes the following criteria:
• | funding for design and permitting has been identified and is expected in the near-term; |
• | key vendors for development activities have been identified, and we expect to engage them at commercially reasonable terms; |
• | we have committed to commencing development activities; |
• | regulatory approval is probable; |
• | construction financing is expected to be available at the time of a final investment decision (“FID”); |
• | prospective customers have been identified and the FID is probable; and |
• | receipt of customary local tax incentives, as needed for project viability, is probable. |
Prior to meeting the criteria above, costs associated with a project are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
When assets are retired or disposed, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property, plant and equipment is carried at historical cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the economic life of the leasehold improvement or the term of the lease, without regard to extension/renewal rights.
Management tests property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances have indicated that the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment might not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets for purposes of assessing recoverability. Recoverability generally is determined by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the expected undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the amount of impairment loss is measured as the excess, if any, of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value.
Warrants
The Company determines the accounting classification of warrants that are issued, as either liability or equity, by first assessing whether the warrants meet liability classification in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), and then in accordance with ASC 815-40,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“ASC 815-40”). Under ASC 480, warrants are considered liability classified if the warrants are mandatorily redeemable, obligate the issuer to settle the warrants or the underlying shares by paying cash or other assets, or warrants that must or may require settlement by issuing a variable number of shares.
If warrants do not meet liability classification under ASC 480, the Company assesses the requirements under ASC 815-40, which states that contracts that require or may require the issuer to settle the contract for cash or a variable number of shares are liabilities recorded at fair value, irrespective of the likelihood of the transaction occurring that triggers the net cash settlement feature. If the warrants do not require liability classification under ASC 815-40, in order to conclude equity classification, the Company assesses whether the warrants are indexed to our common stock and whether the warrants are classified as equity under ASC 815-40 or other applicable GAAP. After all relevant assessments are made, the Company concludes whether the warrants are classified as liability or equity. Liability classified warrants are required to be accounted for at fair value both on the date of issuance and on subsequent accounting period ending dates, with all changes in fair value after the issuance date recorded in the statements of operations as a gain or loss. Equity classified warrants are accounted for at fair value on the issuance date with no changes in fair value recognized after the issuance date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Hierarchy Levels 1,2 and 3 are terms for the priority of inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Hierarchy Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Hierarchy Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Hierarchy Level 3 inputs are inputs that are not observable in the market. In determining fair value, we use observable market data when available, or models that incorporate observable market data. In addition to market information, we incorporate transaction-specific details that, in management’s judgment, market participants would take into account in measuring fair value. We maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize our use of unobservable inputs in arriving at fair value estimates. Recurring fair-value measurements are performed for investment securities as disclosed in Note 4 – Investment Securitiesand for Common Stock Warrant liabilities as disclosed in Note 10– Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is recorded at cost. Issuance of treasury stock is accounted for on a weighted average cost basis. Differences between the cost of treasury stock and the re-issuance proceeds are charged to additional paid-in capital.
Net Loss Per Share
Net loss per share (“EPS”) is computed in accordance with GAAP. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects potential dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period increased by the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and were dilutive. The dilutive effect of unvested stock and warrants is calculated using the treasury-stock method and the dilutive effect of convertible securities is calculated using the if-converted method. Basic and diluted EPS for all periods presented are the same since the effect of our potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive to our net loss per share, as disclosed in Note 11 – Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders.
Share-based Compensation
We recognize share-based compensation at fair value on the date of grant. The fair value is recognized as expense (net of any capitalization) over the requisite service period. For equity-classified share-based compensation awards, compensation cost is recognized based on the grant-date fair value using the quoted market price of our common stock and not subsequently remeasured. The fair value is recognized as expense, net of any capitalization, using the straight-line basis for awards that vest based on service conditions and using the graded-vesting attribution method for awards that vest based on performance conditions. We estimate the service periods for performance awards utilizing a probability assessment based on when we expect to achieve the performance conditions. For liability classified share-based compensation awards, compensation cost is initially recognized on the grant date using estimated payout levels. Compensation cost is subsequently adjusted quarterly to reflect the updated estimated payout levels based on the changes in our stock price. We account for forfeitures as they occur.
Income Taxes
Provisions for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the current period’s provision for income taxes. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a portion or all of the deferred tax assets will expire before realization of the benefit or future deductibility is not probable. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the tax position.
Smaller Reporting Company
Under Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company qualifies as a “smaller reporting company” because the value of its common stock held by non-affiliates as of the end of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter was less than $250 million. For as long as the Company remains a smaller reporting company, it may take advantage of certain exemptions from the SEC’s reporting requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies that are not smaller reporting companies.
Note 3 — Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Prepaid subscriptions | $ | 29 | $ | 161 | ||||
Prepaid insurance | 314 | 292 | ||||||
Prepaid marketing and sponsorships | 60 | 25 | ||||||
Other | 267 | 381 | ||||||
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 670 | $ | 859 |
Note 4 — Investment Securities
We previously invested in Class L shares of the JPMorgan Managed Income Fund. In March 2020, we redeemed the balance of the JPMorgan Managed Income Fund and realized a loss of $0.4 million.
Investment securities are included in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value | Cost | Fair value | Cost | |||||||||||||
JPMorgan Managed Income Fund | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 62,207 | $ | 6,278 |
Note 5 — Sale of Equity Interests in Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC
On March 2, 2020, NextDecade LLC closed the transactions (the “Closing”) contemplated by that certain Omnibus Agreement, dated February 13, 2020, with Spectra Energy Transmission II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. (“Buyer”), pursuant to which NextDecade LLC sold 100 percent of the equity interests (the “Equity Interests”) in Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC (“Rio Bravo”) to Buyer for consideration of approximately $19.4 million. Buyer paid $15.0 million of the purchase price to NextDecade LLC at the Closing and the remainder will be paid within five business days after the date that Rio Grande has received, after a final positive investment decision, the initial funding of financing for the development, construction and operation of the Terminal. In connection with the Closing, Rio Grande LNG Gas Supply LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Rio Grande Gas Supply”), entered into (i) a Precedent Agreement for Firm Natural Gas Transportation Service for the Rio Bravo Pipeline (the “RBPL Precedent Agreement”) with Rio Bravo and (ii) a Precedent Agreement for Natural Gas Transportation Service (the “VCP Precedent Agreement”) with Valley Crossing Pipeline, LLC (“VCP”). VCP and, as of the Closing, Rio Bravo are wholly owned subsidiaries of Enbridge Inc. The Valley Crossing Pipeline is owned and operated by VCP.
Pursuant to the RBPL Precedent Agreement, Rio Bravo agreed to provide Rio Grande Gas Supply with firm natural gas transportation services on the Pipeline in a quantity sufficient to match the full operational capacity of each proposed liquefaction train of the Terminal. Rio Bravo’s obligation to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Pipeline is conditioned on its receipt, no later than December 31, 2023, of notice that Rio Grande Gas Supply or its affiliate has issued a full notice to proceed to the engineering, procurement and construction contractor (the “EPC Contractor”) for the construction of the Terminal. Under the RBPL Precedent Agreement, in consideration for the provision of such firm transportation services, Rio Bravo will be remunerated on a dollar-per-dekatherm, take-or-pay basis, subject to certain adjustments, over a term of at least twenty years, all in compliance with the federal and state authorizations associated with the Pipeline.
Pursuant to the VCP Precedent Agreement, VCP agreed to provide Rio Grande Gas Supply with natural gas transportation services on the Valley Crossing Pipeline in a quantity sufficient to match the commissioning requirements of each proposed liquefaction train of the Terminal. VCP’s obligation to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the necessary interconnection to the Terminal and the Pipeline is conditioned on its receipt, no later than December 31, 2023, of notice that Rio Grande Gas Supply or its affiliate has issued a full notice to proceed to the EPC Contractor for the construction of the Terminal. VCP will be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the tap, riser and valve facilities (the “VCP Transporter Facilities”), which shall connect to Rio Grande Gas Supply’s custody transfer meter and such other facilities as necessary in order for the Terminal to receive gas from the VCP Transporter Facilities (the “Rio Grande Gas Supply Facilities”). Rio Grande Gas Supply will be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, to construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Rio Grande Gas Supply Facilities. Under the VCP Precedent Agreement, in consideration for the provision of the commissioning transportation services, VCP will be remunerated on the same dollar-per-dekatherm, take-or-pay basis as set forth in the RBPL Precedent Agreement for the duration of such commissioning services, all in compliance with the federal and state authorizations associated with the Valley Crossing Pipeline.
If Rio Grande or its affiliate fail to issue a full notice to proceed to the EPC Contractor on or prior to December 31, 2023, Buyer has the right to sell the Equity Interests back to NextDecade LLC and NextDecade LLC has the right to repurchase the Equity Interests from Buyer, in each case at a price not to exceed $23 million. Accordingly, the proceeds from the sale of the Equity Interests and additional costs incurred by Buyer are presented as a non-current liability and the assets of Rio Bravo have not been de-recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2020.
Note 6 — Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Fixed Assets | ||||||||
Computers | $ | 487 | $ | 487 | ||||
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment | 464 | 471 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 101 | 547 | ||||||
Total fixed assets | 1,052 | 1,505 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (660 | ) | (793 | ) | ||||
Total fixed assets, net | 392 | 712 | ||||||
Terminal and Pipeline Assets (not placed in service) | ||||||||
Terminal | 140,253 | 121,081 | ||||||
Pipeline | 21,017 | 12,798 | ||||||
Total Terminal and Pipeline assets | 161,270 | 133,879 | ||||||
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 161,662 | $ | 134,591 |
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $196 thousand and $251 thousand, respectively.
We currently lease approximately 25,600 square feet of office space for general and administrative purposes in Houston, Texas under a lease agreement that expires on September 30, 2021.
On March 6, 2019, Rio Grande entered into a lease agreement (the “Rio Grande Site Lease”) with the Brownsville Navigation District of Cameron County, Texas (“BND”) pursuant to which it has agreed to lease approximately 984 acres of land situated in Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas for the purposes of constructing, operating, and maintaining the Terminal and gas treatment and gas pipeline facilities.
The initial term of the Rio Grande Site Lease is for 30 years (the “Primary Term”), which will commence on the date specified in a written notice by Rio Grande to BND (the “Effective Date Notice”), if given, confirming that Rio Grande or a Rio Grande affiliate has made a positive FID for the first phase of the Terminal. Under the Rio Grande Site Lease, the Effective Date Notice was to be delivered no later than November 6, 2019 (the “Outside Effective Date”) unless Rio Grande was unable to deliver the Effective Date Notice prior to the Outside Effective Date due to reasons unrelated to its own acts or omissions or its inability to secure one or more of the required permits for the Terminal. In such a case, the Outside Effective Date would be automatically extended on a month-to-month basis (the “Effective Date Notice Extension Period”). Rio Grande has the option to renew and extend the term of the Rio Grande Site Lease beyond the Primary Term for up to two consecutive renewal periods of ten years each provided that Rio Grande has not caused an event of default under the Rio Grande Site Lease.
On April 30, 2020, Rio Grande and the BND amended the Rio Grande Site Lease (the “Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment”) to extend the effective date for commencing the Rio Grande Site Lease to May 6, 2021 (the “Effective Date”). The Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment further provides that Rio Grande has the right, exercisable in its sole discretion, to extend the Effective Date to May 6, 2022 by providing the BND with written notice of its election no later than the close of business on the Effective Date.
In January 2017, NextDecade LLC executed surface lease agreements with the City of Texas City and the State of Texas for a 994-acre site for a potential second U.S. LNG project (collectively, the “Galveston Bay Leases”). The term of the Galveston Bay Leases is 36 months with an option to extend for an additional 12 months. Such option was included in the measurement of Operating lease right-of-use assets and Operating lease liabilities and was exercised in the fourth quarter of 2019. The Galveston Bay Leases were not renewed upon expiration on December 31, 2020.
In adopting Topic 842, the Company has elected the “package of practical expedients,” which permits it not to reassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company also elected the use-of-hindsight and the practical expedient pertaining to land easements. The Company elected not to apply Topic 842 to arrangements with original lease terms of 12 months or less. At lease commencement date, the Company estimated the lease liability and the right-of-use assets at present value, at inception, of $2.3 million. On January 1, 2019, upon adoption of Topic 842, the Company recorded right-of-use assets of $1.6 million, lease liabilities of $1.9 million, eliminated deferred rent of $0.1 million and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.2 million.
The Company determines if a contractual arrangement represents or contains a lease at inception. Operating leases with lease terms greater than twelve months are included in Operating lease right-of-use assets and Operating lease liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term. The Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of the future lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is derived from information available at the lease commencement date and represents the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term and amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The right-of-use assets and lease liabilities may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. The Company has lease arrangements that include both lease and non-lease components. The Company accounts for non-lease components separately from the lease component.
Operating lease right-of-use assets are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Office leases | $ | 429 | $ | 610 | ||||
Land leases | 0 | 444 | ||||||
Total operating lease right-of-use assets, net | $ | 429 | $ | 1,054 |
Operating lease liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Office leases | $ | 432 | $ | 698 | ||||
Land leases | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total current lease liabilities | 432 | 698 | ||||||
Non-current office leases | 0 | 3 | ||||||
Non-current land leases | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total lease liabilities | $ | 432 | $ | 701 |
Operating lease expense is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Office leases | $ | 829 | $ | 719 | ||||
Land leases | 446 | 456 | ||||||
Total operating lease expense | 1,275 | 1,175 | ||||||
Short-term lease expense | 319 | 321 | ||||||
Land option expense | 9 | 543 | ||||||
Total land option and lease expense | $ | 1,603 | $ | 2,039 |
Maturity of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
2021 | $ | 452 | ||
2022 | 0 | |||
2023 | 0 | |||
2024 | 0 | |||
2025 | 0 | |||
Thereafter | 0 | |||
Total undiscounted lease payments | 452 | |||
Discount to present value | (20 | ) | ||
Present value of lease liabilities | $ | 432 |
Other information related to our operating leases as of December 31, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities: | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 1,004 | $ | 1,844 | ||||
Noncash right-of-use assets recorded for operating lease liabilities: | ||||||||
Adoption of Topic 842 | 0 | 1,562 | ||||||
In exchange for new operating lease liabilities during the period | 605 | 443 |
Note 8 — Other Non-Current Assets
Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands): | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Permitting costs(1) | $ | 7,385 | $ | 2,637 | ||||
Enterprise resource planning system, net | 1,805 | 3,165 | ||||||
Rio Grande Site Lease initial direct costs | 7,109 | 946 | ||||||
Total other non-current assets, net | $ | 16,299 | $ | 6,748 |
(1) | Permitting costs primarily represent costs incurred in connection with our permit applications to the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for wetlands and habitat mitigation measures for potential impacts to wetlands and habitat that may be caused by the construction of the Terminal. |
Note 9 — Accrued Liabilities and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Employee compensation expense | $ | 14 | $ | 4,221 | ||||
Terminal and Pipeline asset costs | 650 | 2,503 | ||||||
Accrued legal services | 5 | 1,060 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 363 | 967 | ||||||
Total accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | $ | 1,032 | $ | 8,751 |
Note 10 — Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants
Preferred Stock
In August 2018, the Company sold an aggregate of 50,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock), at $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $50 million and issued an additional 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in aggregate as origination fees to (i) York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, severally on behalf of certain funds or accounts managed by it or its affiliates (the “Barding(“York”), (ii) Valinor Management, L.P., severally on behalf of certain funds or accounts for which it is investment manager (“Valinor”), (iii) Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP (formerly known as Halcyon Capital Management LP), severally on behalf of certain funds or accounts managed by it or its affiliates (“Bardin Hill,” and together with York and Valinor, the “Fund Purchasers”) and (iv) HGC NEXT INV LLC (“HGC” and, together with the YCMGA Purchasers and the ValinorFund Purchasers, the “Fund“Series A Preferred Stock Purchasers”) pursuant to which. Warrants were issued together with the Company sold an aggregate of 15,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at $1,000.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million, issued the Series(the “Series A Warrants and issued an additional 300 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in aggregate as origination fees to the Fund Purchasers (the “Fund Purchaser Offering”Warrants”).
In connection with the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and pursuant to backstop commitment agreements with the Fund Purchasers dated April 11, 2018, as subsequently amended on August 3, 2018 (as(as amended, the “Backstop“Backstop Agreements”), wethe Company also issued a total of 413,658 shares of Common StockCompany common stock as fees to the Fund Purchasers. Each Fund Purchaser is a Company stockholder and, pursuant to thethat certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, Agreement dated as of April 17, 2017, by and among the Company, each Fund Purchaser and/or one or more of its affiliates, and the other parties named therein, three individuals, two individuals, and one individual from YCMGA,York, Valinor, and Bardin Hill, respectively, were appointed to the Board.Company’s board of directors.
Warrant Agreements
On August 9,In September 2018, the closing date of the Fund Purchaser Offering (the “Fund Purchaser Offering Closing Date”), the Company delivered a warrant agreement to eachsold an aggregate of the Fund Purchasers governing29,055 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock” and, together with the Series A WarrantsPreferred Stock, the “Convertible Preferred Stock”), at $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $29.055 million and the Company issued an additional 581 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in aggregate as origination fees to certain funds managed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”).
20
In May 2019, the Company sold an aggregate of 20,945 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, at $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $20.945 million and we issued an additional 418 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in aggregate as origination fees to York Tactical Energy Fund, L.P. and York Tactical Energy Fund PIV-AN, L.P. (the “York Tactical Funds” and, together with BlackRock, Bardin Hill, Valinor and HGC, the “Series B Preferred Stock Purchasers”), (ii) Bardin Hill, (iii) Valinor and (iv) HGC. Warrants were issued together with the shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Warrants” and, together with the Series A Warrants, the “Common Stock Warrants”).
The Company has the option to convert all, but not less than all, of the Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of Company common stock at a strike price of $7.34 per share of Company common stock (the “Conversion Price”) on any date on which the volume weighted average trading price of shares of Company common stock for each trading day during any 60 of the prior 90 trading days is equal to or greater than 175% of the Conversion Price, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions. Furthermore, the Company must convert all of the Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of Company common stock at the Conversion Price on the earlier of (i) ten (10) business days following a FID Event (as defined in the certificates of designations of the Convertible Preferred Stock) and (ii) the date that is the tenth (10th) anniversary of the closings of the issuances of the Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable.
The shares of Convertible Preferred Stock bear dividends at a rate of 12% per annum, which are cumulative and accrue daily from the date of issuance on the $1,000 stated value. Such dividends are payable quarterly and may be paid in cash or in-kind. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 the Company paid-in-kind $14.3 million and $11.2 million of dividends, respectively, to holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock. On January 12, 2021, the Company declared dividends to holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock as of the close of business on December 15, 2020. On January 15, 2021, the Company paid-in-kind $3.9 million of dividends to holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock.
The holders of Convertible Preferred Stock vote on an “as-converted” basis with the holders of the Company common stock on all matters brought before the holders of Company common stock. In addition, the holders of Convertible Preferred Stock have separate class voting rights with respect to certain matters affecting their rights.
The Convertible Preferred Stock do not qualify as liability instruments under ASC 480, because they are not mandatorily redeemable. However, as SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 5-02-27 does not permit a probability assessment for a change of control provision, the Convertible Preferred Stock must be presented as mezzanine equity between liabilities and stockholders’ equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets because a change of control event, could force the Company to redeem the Convertible Preferred Stock for cash or assets of the Company. At each balance sheet date, we must re-evaluate whether the Convertible Preferred Stock continue to qualify for equity classification.
Common Stock Warrants
issued to such Fund Purchaser. Under such warrant agreements, the
The Series A Warrants issued to the FundSeries A Preferred Stock Purchasers represent the right to acquire approximately 21 basis points (0.21%) in the aggregate a number of the fully diluted shares of common stock equal to approximately 71 basis points (0.71%) of all outstanding shares of Common StockCompany common stock, measured on a fully-diluted basis, on the exercise date with a strike price of $0.01 per share. The Series AB Warrants issued to the Series B Preferred Stock Purchasers represent the right to acquire in the aggregate a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately 71 basis points (0.71%) of all outstanding shares of Company common stock, measured on a fully diluted basis on the exercise date with a strike price of $0.01 per share.
The Common Stock Warrants have a fixed three-yearthree-year term commencingthat commenced on the respective closings of the issuances of the Series Aassociated Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series ACommon Stock Warrants may only be exercised by holders of the Common Stock Warrants at the expiration of such three-year term; however,three-year term, except that the Company can force the exercise of the Series ACommon Stock Warrants prior to expiration of such term if the volume weighted average trading price of shares of Common Stock for each trading day during any 60 of the prior 90 trading days is equal to or greater than 175% of the $7.50.
Registration Rights Agreements
Onof the Fund Purchaser Offering Closing Date,applicable Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price and, with respect to the Series B Warrants, the Company simultaneously elects to force a mandatory exercise of all other warrants then outstanding and the Fund Purchasers entered into registration rights agreements, as subsequently amended on December 7, 2018 (as amended, the “Registration Rights Agreements”). un-exercised and held by any holder of parity stock. Pursuant to ASC 815-40, the Registration Rights Agreements,fair value of the Common Stock Warrants was recorded as a non-current liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet on the issuance dates. The Company agreedrevalues the Common Stock Warrants at each balance sheet date and recognized a gain of $7.9 million and a loss of $2.7 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Common Stock Warrant liabilities are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation to among other things, (i) fileestimate the fair value of the Common Stock Warrants as soonof December 31, 2020 are as practicable afterfollows:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Stock price | $ | 2.09 | $ | 6.14 | ||||
Exercise price | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Risk-free rate | 0.1 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||
Volatility | 58.6 | % | 27.6 | % | ||||
Term (years) | 0.8 | 1.8 |
Initial Fair Value Allocation
Net proceeds in 2019 were allocated on a fair value basis to the dateSeries B Warrants and on a relative fair value basis to the Series B Preferred Stock. The allocation of net cash proceeds from the sale of Series B Preferred Stock in 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||
Series B | ||||||||||||
Series B | Convertible | |||||||||||
Warrants | Preferred | |||||||||||
Gross proceeds | $ | 20,945 | ||||||||||
Equity issuance costs | 0 | |||||||||||
Net proceeds - Initial Fair Value Allocation | $ | 20,945 | $ | 1,936 | $ | 19,009 | ||||||
Per balance sheet upon issuance | $ | 1,936 | $ | 19,009 |
Beneficial Conversion Feature
ASC 470-20-20 – Debt – Debt with conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”) defines a BCF as a nondetachable conversion feature that is one hundred twenty (120) days afterin the consummationmoney at the issuance date. The Company was required by ASC 470-20 to allocate a portion of the Fund Purchaser Offering Closing Date, but in any event within thirty (30) days after the date that is one hundred twenty (120)proceeds from the consummation of the Fund Purchaser Offering Closing Date, with the SEC a shelf registration statement to permit the public resale of shares of Common Stock underlying (i) the Series A Preferred Stock (including any Common Stock underlyingequal to the intrinsic value of the BCF to additional paid-in capital. The intrinsic value of the BCF is calculated at the issuance date as the difference between the “accounting conversion price” and the market price of shares of Company common stock multiplied by the number of shares of Company common stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock issued as payment-in-kind dividends) issued pursuantis convertible. The accounting conversion prices of $5.58 per share and $6.24 per share for the Fund Purchasers and HGC, respectively, is different than the initial conversion price of $7.50 per share. The “accounting conversion price” is derived by dividing the proceeds allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements andby the Backstop Agreements, as applicable, and (ii)number of shares of Company common stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible. We are recording the accretion of the $2.5 million Series A Preferred Stock discount attributable to the BCF as a deemed dividend using the effective yield method over the period prior to the expected conversion date.
Note 11 — Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders
The following table (in thousands, except for loss per share) reconciles basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 117,524 | 109,057 | ||||||
Dilutive unvested stock, convertible preferred stock, Common Stock Warrants and IPO Warrants | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Diluted | 117,524 | 109,057 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) |
Potentially dilutive securities that were not included in the diluted net loss per share computations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Unvested stock (1) | 916 | 861 | ||||||
Convertible preferred stock | 16,635 | 13,697 | ||||||
Common Stock Warrants | 1,976 | 1,662 | ||||||
IPO Warrants(2) | 12,082 | 12,082 | ||||||
Total potentially dilutive common shares | 31,609 | 28,302 |
(1) | Does not include 2.1 million shares and 3.6 million shares of unvested stock for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 because the performance conditions had not yet been satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. |
(2) | The IPO Warrants were issued in connection with our initial public offering and are exercisable at a price of $11.50 per share and expire July 24, 2022. The Company may redeem the Warrants at a price of $0.01 per IPO Warrant upon 30 days’ notice only if the last sale price of our common stock is at least $17.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period. If the Company redeems the IPO Warrants in this manner, the Company will have the option to do so on a cashless basis with the issuance of an economically equivalent number of shares of Company common stock. |
Note 12 — Share-based Compensation
We have granted shares of Company common stock and restricted stock to employees, consultants and non-employee directors under our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the securities“2017 Plan”) and in connection with the special meeting of stockholders on July 24, 2017.
Total share-based compensation consisted of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Share-based compensation: | ||||||||
Equity awards | $ | (155 | ) | $ | (8,525 | ) | ||
Liability awards | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total share-based compensation | (155 | ) | (8,525 | ) | ||||
Capitalized share-based compensation | (186 | ) | (1,121 | ) | ||||
Total share-based compensation expense | $ | (341 | ) | $ | (9,646 | ) |
On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASU 2018-07”). This standard simplifies aspects of share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the guidance consistent with accounting for employee share-based compensation. Upon adoption of this standard, we reclassified $2.1 million from Share-based compensation liability to Additional paid-in-capital in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Certain employee contracts provided for cash bonuses upon a positive FID in the Terminal (the “FID Bonus”). In January 2018, the Compensation Committee (formerly the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee) of the board of directors approved, and certain employees party to such contracts accepted, an amendment to such contracts whereby the FID Bonuses would be settled in shares of Company common stock equal to 110% of the FID Bonus. The associated liability for FID Bonuses to be settled in shares of Company common stock of $0.2 million is included in share-based compensation liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at each of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The total unrecognized compensation costs at December 31, 2020 relating to equity-classified awards were $3.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 years.
Restricted stock awards are awards of Company common stock that are subject to restrictions on transfer and to a risk of forfeiture if the recipient’s employment with the Company is terminated prior to the lapse of the restrictions. Restricted stock awards vest based on service conditions and/or performance conditions. The amortization of the value of restricted stock grants is accounted for as a charge to compensation expense, or capitalized, depending on the nature of the services provided by the employee, with a corresponding increase to additional-paid-in-capital over the requisite service period.
Grants of restricted stock to employees, non-employees and non-employee directors that vest based on service and/or performance conditions are measured at the closing quoted market price of our common stock on the grant date.
The table below provides a summary of our restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands, except for per share information):
Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | |||||||
Non-vested at January 1, 2020 | 4,772 | $ | 7.95 | |||||
Granted | 225 | 3.02 | ||||||
Vested | (612 | ) | 5.38 | |||||
Forfeited | (874 | ) | 8.08 | |||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2020 | 3,511 | $ | 8.05 |
Note 13 — Income Taxes
The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
U.S. federal statutory rate, beginning of year | 21 | % | 21 | % | ||||
Officers' compensation | 2 | 7 | ||||||
Other | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Valuation allowance | (20 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||
Effective tax rate as reported | 0 | % | 0 | % |
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets | ||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards and credits | $ | 20,698 | $ | 15,064 | ||||
Share-based compensation expense | 3,813 | 3,441 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 725 | 1,025 | ||||||
Common stock warrant liabilities | 0 | 524 | ||||||
Operating lease liabilities | 91 | 147 | ||||||
Other | 54 | 21 | ||||||
Less: valuation allowance | (22,669 | ) | (19,802 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax assets | 2,712 | 420 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||
Common stock warrant liabilities | (1,129 | ) | 0 | |||||
Operating lease Right-of-use assets | (1,583 | ) | (420 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (2,712 | ) | (420 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
The federal deferred tax assets presented above do not include the state tax benefits as our net deferred state tax assets are offset with a full valuation allowance.
At December 31, 2020, we had federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $98.6 million. Approximately $26.1 million of these NOL carryforwards will expire between 2034 and 2038.
Due to our history of NOLs, current year NOLs and significant risk factors related to our ability to generate taxable income, we have established a valuation allowance to offset our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. We will continue to evaluate our ability to release the valuation allowance in the future. Due to our full valuation allowance, we have not recorded a provision for federal or state income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are classified as non-current in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (as amended) contains provisions that limit the utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards if there has been a change in ownership as described in clausesSection 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”). Substantial changes in the Company's ownership have occurred that may limit or reduce the amount of NOL carryforwards that the Company could utilize in the future to offset taxable income. The Company has not completed a detailed Section 382 study at this time to determine what impact, if any, that ownership changes may have had on its NOL carryforwards. In each period since its inception, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of its deferred tax assets, as the realization of the deferred tax asset is uncertain. As a result, the Company has not recognized any federal or state income tax benefit in its Consolidated Statement of Operations.
We remain subject to periodic audits and reviews by taxing authorities; however, we did not have any open income tax audits as of December 31, 2020. The federal tax returns for the years beginning 2015 remain open for examination.
In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the President signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) on March 27, 2020 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (the “CAA”) on December 27, 2020. The CARES Act and the CAA provide numerous relief provisions for corporate taxpayers, including modification of the utilization limitations on NOLs, favorable expansions of the deduction for business interest expense under Internal Revenue Code Section 163(j), and the ability to accelerate timing of refundable alternative minimum tax credits. For the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no material tax impacts to our consolidated financial statements from the CARES Act, the CAA or other COVID-19 measures. The Company continues to monitor additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service and others.
Note 14 — Commitments and Contingencies
Other Commitments
On March 6, 2019, Rio Grande entered into a lease agreement (the “Rio Grande Site Lease”) with the Brownsville Navigation District of Cameron County, Texas (“BND”) for the lease by Rio Grande of approximately 984 acres of land situated in Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas for the purposes of constructing, operating, and maintaining (i) a liquefied natural gas facility and export terminal and (ii), gas treatment and gas pipeline facilities. On April 30, 2020, Rio Grande and the “Registrable Securities”BND amended the Rio Grande Site Lease (the “Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment”) to extend the effective date for commencing the Rio Grande Site Lease to May 6, 2021 (the “Effective Date”). Further,The Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment further provides that Rio Grande has the right, exercisable in its sole discretion, to extend the Effective Date to May 6, 2022 by providing the BND with written notice of its election no later than the close of business on the Effective Date.
In connection with the Rio Grande Site Lease Amendment, Rio Grande is committed to pay approximately $1.5 million per quarter to the BND through the earlier of the Effective Date and lease commencement.
Obligation under LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement
In March 2019, we entered into a 20-year sale and purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Shell NA LNG LLC (“Shell”) for the supply of approximately two million tonnes per annum of liquefied natural gas from the Terminal. Pursuant to the SPA, Shell will purchase LNG on a free-on-board (“FOB”) basis starting from the date the first liquefaction train of the Terminal that is commercially operable, with approximately three-quarters of the purchased LNG volume indexed to Brent and the remaining volume indexed to domestic United States gas indices, including Henry Hub.
In the first quarter of 2020, pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the SPA became effective upon the conditions precedent in the SPA being satisfied or waived. The SPA obligates Rio Grande to deliver the contracted volumes of LNG to Shell at the FOB delivery point, subject to the first liquefaction train at the Terminal being commercially operable.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time the Company may be subject to various claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We regularly analyze current information and, as necessary, provide accruals for liabilities we deem probable and estimable.
As of December 31, 2020, management was not aware of any claims or legal actions that, separately or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows, although the Company cannot guarantee that a material adverse event will not occur.
Note 15 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting standards that have not been adopted by the Company during the reporting period:
Standard | Description | Date of Adoption | Effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters | |||
ASU 2020-06,Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) | This standard requires entities to provide expanded disclosures about the terms and features of convertible instruments. For convertible instruments, the instruments primarily affected are those issued with beneficial conversion features or cash conversion features because the accounting models for those specific features are removed. | January 1, 2022 | We are currently evaluating the effect of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Note 16 — Subsequent Events
On March 17, 2021, the Company entered into a Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Series C Stock Purchase Agreements”) with each of (i) York Capital Management, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (“York”), (ii) certain affiliates of Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP (“Bardin Hill”), and (iii) Avenue Energy Opportunities Fund II, L.P (“Avenue” and together with York and Bardin Hill, the “Purchasers”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to keep such shelf registration statement effective untilsell, and the earliestPurchasers agreed to purchase shares of (i) the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), together with associated warrants, for an aggregate purchase price of $24.5 million. The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Series C Stock Purchase Agreements occurred at multiple closings on or prior to March 22, 2021.
We have evaluated subsequent events through March 25, 2021, the date all such Registrable Securities ceased to be Registrable Securities and (ii) the date all such Registrable Securities covered by such shelf registration statement can be sold publicly without restriction financial statements were issued. Any material subsequent events that occurred during this time have been properly recognized and/or limitation under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and without the requirement to bedisclosed in compliance with Rule 144(c)(1) under the Securities Act. The Company filed such shelf registration statement with the SEC on December 20, 2018 and such registration statement became effective on December 26, 2018.these financial statements.
Director Independence
The Company adheres to the Nasdaq listing rules in determining whether a director is independent. The Board consults with its counsel to ensure that the Board’s determinations are consistent with such rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors. The Nasdaq listing rules define an “independent director” as a person, other than an executive officer of a company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
The Board undertook a review of the independence of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. The Board considered the relationships that each director has with us and all other facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant in determining his or her independence, including the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock owned by each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his background, employment, affiliations and common stock ownership, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Belke, Bonanno, Gallo, Kripalani, Lee, Magid, Rosenfeld, Vrattos and Wells are independent under the Nasdaq listing rules. Additionally, the Board determined that David Sgro, a former member of the Board who served until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, was independent under the Nasdaq listing rules.
The Board determined that Mr. Schatzman is not an independent director under the Nasdaq listing rules because he currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mrs. Eisbrenner is not an independent director under the Nasdaq listing rules because she served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until February 2018. René van Vliet, a former member of the Board,was not an independent director under the Nasdaq listing rules because he served as executive officer of the Company until October 2018.
21
NextDecade Corporation and Subsidiaries
Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements
Summarized Quarterly Financial Data
(unaudited)
Summarized Quarterly Financial Data – (in thousands, except per share amounts)
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Total operating loss | (7,241 | ) | (5,211 | ) | (5,557 | ) | (4,003 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | (2,617 | ) | (9,304 | ) | (10,807 | ) | (6,056 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share (1) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2019: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Total operating loss | (12,488 | ) | (5,582 | ) | (4,412 | ) | (12,519 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | (17,566 | ) | (7,207 | ) | (6,362 | ) | (17,417 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share (1) | (0.16 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.16 | ) |
(1) | The sum of the quarterly basic and diluted loss per share may not equal the full year amount as the computation of the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic and diluted shares outstanding for each quarter and the full year are performed independently. |
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees9. Changes in and ServicesDisagreements with Accountants
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Dismissal
Evaluation of Marcum LLPDisclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of “our disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
As management, we are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have conducted an assessment, including testing using the criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s Currentsystem of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and, even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Based on our assessment, we have concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
The Company is neither an accelerated filer nor a large accelerated filer, as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act and, therefore, this Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with10-K does not include an audit report on internal control over financial reporting by the SEC on August 30, 2018 (the “Auditor Form 8-K”), Marcum LLP (“Marcum”), an independentCompany’s registered public accounting firm, served as the Company’s independent auditors until August 24, 2018 when the Audit Committee dismissed Marcum in connection with the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) on August 24, 2018.
Marcum’s auditfirm. Management’s report on the consolidatedinternal control over financial statements of the Company as of andreporting for the year ended December 31, 2017 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and2020 was not qualified or modified asrequired to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the subsequent interim period through August 24, 2018, there were no (i) disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) with Marcum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Marcum, would have caused Marcum to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in their reports onbe attested by the Company’s financial statements nor (ii) any reportable event as described inregistered public accounting firm pursuant to Item 304(a)(1)(v)308(b) of Regulation S-K.
The Company provided Marcum with a copy
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
Pursuant to paragraph 3 of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, the information required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Report is incorporated by reference from NextDecade’s definitive proxy statement, which is to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the disclosures contained inExchange Act within 120 days after the Auditor Form 8-K and requested in writing that Marcum furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agreed with the statements made therein. Marcum provided a letter, dated August 29, 2018, which letter is attached to the Auditor Form 8-K as Exhibit 16.1.
Independent Auditors and Fees
Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for theend of NextDecade’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and Marcum was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
The following table presents (i) fees for professional audit services rendered by (a) Grant Thornton for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and (b) Marcum for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 and (ii) fees billed for other services rendered by Grant Thornton and Marcum:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 | ||
Audit fees(1) |
| $ | 175,037 |
| $ | 201,851 |
Tax fees(2) |
|
| — |
|
| 7,168 |
Total |
| $ | 175,037 |
| $ | 209,019 |
|
|
|
|
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, retention, termination, compensation and oversight of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. Requests for approval are generally submitted at a meeting of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a committee member, provided that any decisions made by such member shall be presented to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting.
22
Part IV
Item 15. ExhibitsExhibit and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) | Financial Statements, Schedules and Exhibits |
(1) | Financial Statements |
| |
31 | |
32 | |
| 33 |
34 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 35 |
Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements – Summarized Quarterly Financial Data |
|
(2) | Financial Statement Schedules: |
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3) | Exhibits: |
|
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ||
10.2(19)† | NextDecade Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan | |
| Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Executive Employees and Contractors |
| ||
| ||
|
23
| ||
| ||
| ||
31.1* |
| |
31.2* |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document (the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document). | |
101.SCH* |
|
|
| Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
|
| Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
| Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
| Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
| Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). |
(1) |
|
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the |
24
(5) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the | ||
(7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 15, 2019. | ||
(8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 6, 2019. | ||
(9) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 6, 2019. |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 4, 2021. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Amendment No. 7 to the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Amendment No. 7 to the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the |
(16) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit |
(17) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 15, 2017. |
(20) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed August 7, 2018. |
(22) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed August 7, 2018. |
(23) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed August 24, 2018. |
(24) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form |
(25) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 6, 2019. |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 6, 2019. | |
(27) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 6, 2019. |
(28) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 6, 2019. |
(29) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 7, 2019. |
(30) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 20, 2019. |
(31) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 20, 2019. |
(32) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 20, 2019. |
(33) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form |
(34) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form |
(35) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form |
(36) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 6, 2019. |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 6, 2019. | |
(38) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 5, 2019. |
(39) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2020. |
(40) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2020. |
(41) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2020. |
(42) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2020. |
(43) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2020. |
(44) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the |
(45) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the |
(46) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 18, 2020. | |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the |
(48) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the |
(49) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the |
(50) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the |
(51) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the |
(52) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the |
(53) |
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the |
* |
|
** | Furnished herewith. |
† |
|
+ | Certain portions of |
|
|
* Filed herewith.
** Filed as an exhibit to NextDecade Corporation’s Annual Report onItem 16. Form 10-K filed on March 6, 2019.Summary
† Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
25
None.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
NextDecade Corporation | |||
(Registrant) | |||
By: | /s/ Matthew K. Schatzman | ||
Matthew K. Schatzman | |||
| |||
(Principal Executive Officer) | |||
Date: | March 25, 2021 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
| |||
Title |
| Date | ||
/s/ Matthew K. Schatzman |
| March 25, 2021 | ||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
/s/ Brent E. Wahl | Chief Financial Officer | March 25, 2021 | ||
Brent E. Wahl | (Principal Financial Officer) | |||
/s/ Eric Garcia | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | March 25, 2021 | ||
Eric Garcia | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |||
/s/ Brian Belke | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Brian Belke | ||||
/s/ Frank Chapman | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Frank Chapman | ||||
/s/ Taewon Jun | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Taewon Jun | ||||
/s/ Avinash Kripalani | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Avinash Kripalani | ||||
/s/ Khalifa Abdulla Al Romaithi | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Khalifa Abdulla Al Romaithi | ||||
/s/ Thanasi Skafidas | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Thanasi Skafidas | ||||
/s/ William Vrattos | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
William Vrattos | ||||
/s/ Spencer Wells | Director | March 25, 2021 | ||
Spencer Wells |
26