UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q



ý	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018



¨	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-7087

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



New York (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	16-0959303 (IRS Employer Identification Number)

130 Commerce Way, East Aurora, New York (Address of principal executive offices)	14052 (Zip code)

(716) 805-1599

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

$.01 par value Common Stock, $.01 par value Class B Stock

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, an “accelerated filer”, a “non-accelerated filer” and a “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	ý	Accelerated filer	¨	Emerging growth company	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller Reporting Company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a)

of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

As of ~~July 1, 2017, 28,701,344~~March 31, 2018, 28,091,729 shares of common stock were outstanding consisting of ~~21,685,182~~21,431,253 shares of common stock ($.01 par value) and ~~7,016,162~~6,660,476 shares of Class B common stock ($.01 par value).

TABLE OF CONTENTS



			PAGE
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1	Financial Statements:

		• Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017	3

		• Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017 ~~and July 2, 2016~~	4

		• Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017 ~~and July 2, 2016~~	5

		• Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Three Months Ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017 ~~and July 2, 2016~~	6

		• Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements	7

	Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1822

	Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	26

	Item 4	Controls and Procedures	26

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1	Legal Proceedings	27

	Item 1a	Risk Factors	2728

	Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28

	Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	28

	Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	28

	Item 5	Other Information	28

	Item 6	Exhibits	2829

SIGNATURES			2930

Part I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets

~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 with Comparative Figures for December 31, ~~2016~~2017

(In thousands)


	July 1, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	8,268		$	17,901		$	16,387		$	17,914
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	120,380			109,415			157,650			132,633
Inventories	134,423			116,597			159,961			150,196
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets	14,444			11,160			15,895			14,586
Total Current Assets	277,515			255,073			349,893			315,329
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation	122,646			122,812			124,762			125,830
Other Assets	15,738			13,149			19,693			15,659
Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization	94,364			98,103			147,592			153,493
Goodwill	117,565			115,207			125,630			125,645
Total Assets	$	627,828		$	604,344		$	767,570		$	735,956
Current Liabilities:
Current Maturities of Long-term Debt	$	2,651		$	2,636		$	2,478		$	2,689
Accounts Payable	30,840			25,070			61,387			41,846
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities	30,504			35,686			36,510			38,749
Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue	20,095			23,168			22,164			19,607
Total Current Liabilities	84,090			86,560			122,539			102,891
Long-term Debt	160,315			145,484			273,627			269,078
Other Liabilities	35,700			34,851			33,376			34,060
Total Liabilities	280,105			266,895			429,542			406,029
Shareholders’ Equity:
Common Stock	297			297			298			297
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	(12,741		)	(15,494		)	(14,277		)	(13,352		)
Other Shareholders’ Equity	360,167			352,646			352,007			342,982
Total Shareholders’ Equity	347,723			337,449			338,028			329,927
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	627,828		$	604,344		$	767,570		$	735,956

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations

Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 With Comparative Figures for ~~2016~~2017

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017
Sales	$	303,510	$	323,956	$	151,114	$	164,426	$	179,059	$	152,396
Cost of Products Sold	231,043		239,638		116,964		119,591		141,927		114,079
Gross Profit	72,467		84,318		34,150		44,835		37,132		38,317
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses	44,094		44,108		22,401		22,224		30,500		21,383
Income from Operations	28,373		40,210		11,749		22,611		6,632		16,934
Other Expense, Net of Other Income									375		310
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income	2,313		2,143		1,180		1,056		2,331		1,133
Income Before Income Taxes	26,060		38,067		10,569		21,555		3,926		15,491
Provision for Income Taxes	6,788		11,602		2,884		6,575		632		3,904
Net Income	$	19,272	$	26,465	$	7,685	$	14,980	$	3,294	$	11,587
Earnings Per Share:
Basic	$	0.66	$	0.90	$	0.27	$	0.51	$	0.12	$	0.40
Diluted	$	0.64	$	0.87	$	0.26	$	0.50	$	0.11	$	0.38

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 With Comparative Figures for ~~2016~~2017

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017
Net Income	$	19,272	$	26,465	$	7,685	$	14,980		$	3,294	$	11,587
Other Comprehensive Income:
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments	2,491		1,305		2,096		(511		)	233		395
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax	262		261		131		130			215		131
Other Comprehensive Income	2,753		1,566		2,227		(381		)
Total Other Comprehensive Income										448		526
Comprehensive Income	$	22,025	$	28,031	$	9,912	$	14,599		$	3,742	$	12,113

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

~~Six~~Three Months Ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018

With Comparative Figures for ~~2016~~2017

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	19,272		$	26,465		$	3,294		$	11,587
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided By Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization	12,587			13,146			9,841			6,298
Provisions for Non-Cash Losses on Inventory and Receivables	918			928			564			535
Stock Compensation Expense	1,456			1,256			931			656
Deferred Tax Benefit	(536		)	(980		)	(1,128		)	(516		)
Other	(804		)	320			(467		)	(291		)
Cash Flows from Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable	(7,076		)	(10,860		)	(20,868		)	(3,268		)
Inventories	(10,453		)	(4,145		)	(18,204		)	(5,957		)
Accounts Payable	3,349			(10		)	19,418			4,397
Accrued Expenses	(7,106		)	(3,643		)	(3,194		)	(8,477		)
Other Current Assets and Liabilities	(2,668		)	32			(3,474		)	(942		)
Customer Advanced Payments and Deferred Revenue	(4,143		)	(9,992		)	10,482			(2,072		)
Income Taxes	(1,028		)	10,107			1,303			4,038
Supplemental Retirement and Other Liabilities	758			695			448			382
Cash Provided By Operating Activities	4,526			23,319
Cash (Used For) Provided By Operating Activities							(1,054		)	6,370
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired	(10,223		)	—
Capital Expenditures	(5,750		)	(6,176		)	(4,346		)	(2,767		)
Other Investing Activities	186			(850		)
Cash Used For Investing Activities	(15,787		)	(7,026		)	(4,346		)	(2,767		)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Long-term Debt	22,000			15,000			15,000			—
Payments for Long-term Debt	(7,341		)	(18,279		)	(10,705		)	(6,657		)
Purchase of Outstanding Shares for Treasury	(13,524		)	(12,154		)	—			(4,413		)
Debt Acquisition Costs	—			(164		)	(516		)	—
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options	317			557			160			295
Income Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options	—			529
Cash Provided By (Used For) Financing Activities	1,452			(14,511		)	3,939			(10,775		)
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash	176			68			(66		)	34
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	(9,633		)	1,850
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents							(1,527		)	(7,138		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	17,901			18,561			17,914			17,901
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	8,268		$	20,411		$	16,387		$	10,763

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018

(Unaudited)

1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

~~All 2016 share quantities and per share data reported have been restated to reflect the impact of the three-for-twenty Class B stock distribution to shareholders of record on October 11, 2016.~~

Operating Results

The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Operating results for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

The balance sheet at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements.

For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Astronics Corporation’s ~~2016~~2017 annual report on Form 10-K.

Description of the Business

Astronics Corporation (“Astronics” or the “Company”) is a leading ~~supplier~~provider of ~~products~~advanced technologies to the global aerospace, defense, electronics and semiconductor industries. Our products and services include advanced, high-performance electrical power generation, distribution and motion systems, lighting &and safety systems, avionics products, systems and certification, aircraft structures ~~systems certification,~~and automated test ~~systems and other products.~~systems.

We have operations in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada and France. We design and build our products through our wholly owned subsidiaries ~~Armstrong Aerospace, Inc. (“Armstrong”);~~ Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp. (“AES”); Astronics AeroSat Corporation (“AeroSat”); Armstrong Aerospace, Inc. (“Armstrong”); Astronics Test Systems, Inc. (“ATS”); Ballard Technology, Inc. (“Ballard”); Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certification Corp. (“CSC”); Astronics Custom Control Concepts Inc. (“CCC”); Astronics DME LLC (“DME”); Luminescent Systems, Inc. (“LSI”); Luminescent Systems Canada, Inc. (“LSI Canada”); Max-Viz, Inc. (“Max-Viz”); Peco, Inc. (“Peco”); and PGA Electronic s.a. (“PGA”) ~~and Astronics Test Systems, Inc. (“ATS”)~~.

On April 3, 2017, Astronics Custom Control Concepts Inc. ~~("CCC")~~, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Custom Control Concepts ~~LLC.~~LLC, located in Kent, Washington. CCC is a provider of cabin management and in-flight entertainment systems for a range of aircraft. CCC is included in our Aerospace segment.

On December 1, 2017, Astronics acquired substantially all of the assets of Telefonix Inc. and a related company, Product Development Technologies, LLC and its subsidiaries, to become CSC, primarily located in Waukegan and Lake Zurich, Illinois. CSC designs and manufactures advanced in-flight entertainment and connectivity equipment, and provides industry leading design consultancy services for the global aerospace industry. CSC is included in our Aerospace Segment.

For additional information regarding these acquisitions see Note 18.

Cost of Products Sold, Engineering and Development and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Cost of products sold includes the costs to manufacture products such as direct materials and labor and manufacturing overhead as well as all engineering and development costs. The Company is engaged in a variety of engineering and design activities as well as basic research and development activities directed to the substantial improvement or new application of the Company’s existing technologies. These costs are expensed when incurred and included in cost of products sold. Research and development, design and related engineering amounted to ~~$23.0~~$28.9 million and ~~$21.4~~$22.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and ~~$45.8 million and $44.6 million for the six months ended July~~April 1, 2017, ~~and July 2, 2016,~~ respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs primarily related to our sales and marketing departments and administrative departments. Interest expense is shown net of interest income. Interest income was insignificant for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, ~~2017 and July 2, 2016.~~2017.

Foreign Currency Translation

The aggregate transaction gain or loss included in operations was insignificant for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, ~~2017~~2017.

Precontract Costs

The Company may, from time to time, incur costs in excess of the amounts required for existing contracts. If it is determined the costs are probable of recovery from future orders, the precontract costs incurred are capitalized, excluding start-up costs which are expensed as incurred. Capitalized precontract costs are included in Inventories in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Should future orders not materialize or it is determined the costs are no longer probable of recovery, the capitalized costs are written off. Included in inventories at March 31, 2018 are capitalized precontract costs of $8.4 million.

Newly Adopted and ~~July 2, 2016.~~

Recent Accounting Pronouncements ~~Adopted in 2017~~

~~On January 1, 2017,~~In May 2014, the ~~Company adopted~~FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. ~~2016-09,~~2014-09, ~~Improvements~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), that, together with several subsequent updates, outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to ~~Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Prospectively, beginning January 1, 2017, excess tax benefits/deficiencies are reflected as income tax benefit/expense~~use in ~~the statement of income, resulting in a $0.3 million tax benefit~~accounting for ~~the six months ended July 1, 2017. The extent of excess tax benefits/deficiencies~~revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 is subject to variation in the Company’s stock price and timing/extent of employee stock option exercises. Under previous accounting guidance, when a share-based payment award such as a stock option was granted to an employee, the fair value of the award was generally recognized over the vesting period. However, the related deduction from taxes payable was based on the ~~award’s intrinsic value~~principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also provides for enhanced disclosure requirements surrounding revenue recognition.

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, revenue on a significant portion of our contracts had been recognized at the time of ~~exercise, which could be either greater (creating an excess tax benefit) or less (creating~~shipment of goods, transfer of title and customer acceptance, as required. Our revenue transactions generally consist of a ~~tax deficiency) than~~single performance obligation to transfer promised goods and are not accounted for under industry-specific guidance. We have retained much of the ~~compensation cost recognized in~~same accounting treatment used to recognize revenue under the ~~financial statements. Excess tax benefits were recognized in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) within equity, while deficiencies were first recorded~~prior standard. However, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 required us to ~~APIC~~accelerate the recognition of revenue as compared to the ~~extent previously recognized excess tax benefits existed, after~~prior standard, for certain customers, in cases where we produce products unique to those customers; and for which ~~time deficiencies were recorded~~we would have an enforceable right of payment, inclusive of profit, for production completed to ~~income tax expense. The Company’s adoption~~date.

We adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method, which required the recognition of ~~this ASU also resulted in associated excess tax benefits being classified~~the cumulative effect of the transition as an ~~operating activity in~~adjustment to retained earnings. The Company elected to apply the ~~same manner~~standard only to open contracts as ~~other cash flows related to income taxes in the statement~~ of ~~cash flows prospectively beginning~~ January 1, ~~2017.~~2018. Based on the ~~adoption methodology~~application of the changes described above, we recognized a transition adjustment of $3.3 million, net of tax effects, which increased our January 1, 2018 retained earnings. Based on our existing operations, ASU 2014-09 is not expected to have a material impact to net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.

During the first quarter of 2018, the Company early-adopted ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows for a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company applied the ~~statement of cash flows classification of prior periods has not changed. As permitted by the ASU, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures~~guidance as ~~they occur. None~~ of the beginning of the period of adoption and reclassified approximately $1.4 million from accumulated other ~~provisions~~comprehensive loss to retained earnings due to the change in ~~this amended guidance had~~federal corporate tax rate.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 02, Leases. The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The standard will require lessees to report most leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, while lessor accounting will remain substantially unchanged. The standard requires a ~~significant~~modified retrospective transition approach for existing leases, whereby the new rules will be applied to the earliest year presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires entities to recognize income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs rather than when the asset is sold to a third party as is the case under current GAAP. The Company adopted ASU 2016-16 effective January 1, 2018, and such adoption did not have a material impact on the ~~Company’s~~ consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2017-04,~~2017-01, ~~Simplifying~~Clarifying the ~~Test~~Definition of a Business, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for ~~Goodwill Impairment~~evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The ASU requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to

include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The standard also narrows the definition of outputs. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under the new guidance, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2018. The Company will apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date on a prospective basis. No applicable transactions have occurred as of March 31, 2018.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This ASU changes how employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans present the net periodic benefit cost in the income statement. This ASU was adopted as of January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. Under the new standard, ~~goodwill impairment~~only the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost would be ~~measured~~included in operating expenses. All other net periodic benefit costs components (such as interest cost, prior service cost amortization and actuarial gain/loss amortization) would be reported outside of operating income. These include components totaling $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the ~~amount by which~~periods ended March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017, respectively, that no longer are included within Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and instead are reported outside of income from operations, within Other Expense, Net of Other Income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, that clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a ~~reporting unit’s carrying~~share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. The general model for accounting for modifications of share-based payment awards is to record the incremental value ~~exceeds its fair value, not~~arising from the changes as additional compensation cost. Under the new standard, fewer changes to ~~exceed~~ the ~~carrying value~~terms of ~~goodwill.~~an award would require accounting under this modification model. This ASU ~~eliminates existing guidance that requires an entity~~was adopted as of January 1, 2018. As the Company has not made changes to ~~determine goodwill impairment by calculating~~ the ~~implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all~~terms or conditions of its ~~assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. This~~issued share-based payment awards, this ASU ~~is effective prospectively to annual and interim impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 on January 1, 2017~~ had no impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

2) Revenue

As discussed in Note 1, we adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the ~~financial statements~~modified retrospective method, which required the recognition of the cumulative effect of the transition as an adjustment to retained earnings.

Revenue is recognized when, or as, the Company transfers control of promised products or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring those products or service.

Payment terms and conditions vary by contract, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within a range from 30 to 60 days, or in certain cases, up-front deposits. In circumstances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that the Company's contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. Taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to governmental authorities, are excluded from sales.

The Company recognizes an asset for the incremental, material costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if the Company expects the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year. As of March 31, 2018, the Company does not have such incremental, material costs on any open contracts with an original expected duration of greater than one year, and therefore, we expense such costs as incurred. These incremental costs include, but are not limited to, sales commissions incurred to obtain a contract with a customer.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The majority of our contracts have a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer the individual goods or services is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and is, therefore, not distinct. Promised goods or services that are immaterial in the context of the contract are not separately assessed as performance obligations.

Some of our contracts have multiple performance obligations, most commonly due to the contract covering multiple phases of the product lifecycle (development, production, maintenance and support). For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. The primary method used to estimate standalone selling price is the expected cost plus a margin approach, under which we forecast our expected costs of satisfying a performance obligation and then add an appropriate margin for that distinct good or service. Shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer has obtained control of the good are considered fulfillment activities, not performance obligations.

Some of our contracts offer price discounts or free units after a specified volume has been purchased. The Company evaluates these options to determine whether they provide a material right to the customer, or represent a separate performance obligation. If the option provides a material right to the customer, revenue is recognized when those future goods or services are transferred or when the option expires.

Contract modifications are routine in the performance of our contracts. Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications or requirements. In most instances, contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct, and, therefore, are accounted for as part of the existing contract. The aggregate effect of all modifications as of the period beginning January 1, 2018 has been reflected when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price and allocating the transaction price. Contracts modified prior to January 1, 2018 have not been retrospectively restated.

The majority of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when the customer obtains control of the promised product, which is generally upon delivery and acceptance by the customer. These contracts may provide credits or incentives, which are accounted for as variable consideration. Variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount to predict the consideration to which the Company will be entitled, and only to the extent it is probable that a subsequent change in estimate will not result in a significant revenue reversal when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Variable consideration is treated as a change to the sales transaction price and based largely on an assessment of all information (i.e., historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to the Company, and estimated at contract inception and updated at the end of each reporting period as additional information becomes available. Most of our contracts do not contain rights to return product; where this right does exist, it is evaluated as possible variable consideration.

For contracts with customers in which the Company satisfies a promise to the customer to provide a product that has no alternative use to the Company and the Company has enforceable rights to payment for progress completed to date inclusive of profit, the Company satisfies the performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time, using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress toward satisfying our performance obligations. Incurred cost represents work performed, which corresponds with, and thereby best depicts, the transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs include labor, material and overhead.

The Company also recognizes revenue from service contracts (including service-type warranties) over time. The Company recognizes revenue over time during the term of the agreement as the customer is simultaneously receiving and consuming the benefits provided throughout the Company’s performance. Therefore, due to control transferring over time, the Company recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis throughout the contract period.

Approximately 5% of revenue for the three ~~or six~~months ending March 31, 2018 was recognized over time.

On March 31, 2018, we had $398.6 million of remaining performance obligations, which we refer to as total backlog. We expect to recognize approximately $356.1 million of our remaining performance obligations as revenue in 2018.

We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated January 1, 2018 balance sheet for the adoption of ASU 2014-09, were as follows (in thousands):



Balance Sheet	Balance at December 31, 2017		Adjustments Due to ASU 2014-09			Balance at January 1, 2018
Assets
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	$	132,633	$	4,005		$	136,638
Inventories	$	150,196	$	(7,957	)	$	142,239

Liabilities
Accrued Income Taxes	$	261	$	1,028		$	1,289
Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue	$	19,607	$	(8,176	)	$	11,431
Deferred Income Taxes	$	5,121	$	(72	)	$	5,049

Equity
Retained Earnings	$	325,191	$	3,268		$	328,459

In accordance with the new revenue standard requirements, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on our consolidated income statement and balance sheet was as follows (in thousands):



	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Income Statement	As Reported		Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)		Balances Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09
Revenues
Aerospace	$	164,600	$	658	$	163,942
Test Systems	$	14,459	$	1,961	$	12,498

Costs and Expenses
Cost of Products Sold	$	141,927	$	1,347	$	140,580
Provision for Income Taxes	$	632	$	293	$	339

Net Income	$	3,294	$	979	$	2,315



	March 31, 2018
Balance Sheet	As Reported		Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)			Balances Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09
Assets
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	$	157,650	$	5,859		$	151,791
Inventories	$	159,961	$	(9,366	)	$	169,327

Liabilities
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities	$	36,510	$	639		$	35,871
Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue	$	22,164	$	(9,004	)	$	31,168
Other Liabilities	$	33,376	$	611		$	32,765

Equity
Other Shareholders' Equity	$	352,007	$	4,247		$	347,760

Costs in excess of billings includes unbilled amounts resulting from revenues under contracts with customers that are satisfied over time and when the cost-to-cost measurement method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, and right to payment is not just subject to the passage of time. Amounts may not exceed their net realizable value. Costs in excess of billings are classified as current assets, within Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Billings in excess of cost includes billings in excess of revenue recognized as well as deferred revenue, which includes advanced payments, up-front payments, and progress billing payments. Billings in excess of cost are classified as current liabilities, reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheet within Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue. To determine the revenue recognized in the period from the beginning balance of billings in excess of cost, the contract liability as of the beginning of the period is recognized as revenue on a contract-by-contract basis when the Company incurs costs to satisfy the performance obligation related to the individual contract. Once the beginning contract liability balance for an individual contract has been fully recognized as revenue, any additional payments received in the period are recognized as revenue once the related costs have been incurred.

Revenue recognized in 2018 that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the year was $3.2 million.

The Company's contract assets and contract liabilities consist of costs in excess of billings and billings in excess of cost, respectively. The following table presents the beginning and ending balances of contract assets and contract liabilities during the three months ended ~~July 1, 2017, as there was no impairment analysis performed during the period.~~March 31, 2018 (in thousands):



	Contract Assets		Contract Liabilities
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2018 (1)	$	24,423	$	11,431
Ending Balance, March 31, 2018	$	18,966	$	22,164
(1) Due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018, the Company recorded a transition adjustment to the opening balance of Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities at January 1, 2018. Refer to the cumulative effect of the changes table above for further explanation of the changes made to our consolidated January 1, 2018 balance sheet.

The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by Market Segments (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	3/31/2018		4/1/2017
Aerospace Segment
Commercial Transport	$	133,050	$	109,723
Military	14,015		15,146
Business Jet	10,664		7,536
Other	6,871		4,422
Aerospace Total	164,600		136,827

Test Systems Segment
Semiconductor	7,060		4,631
Aerospace & Defense	7,399		10,938
Test Systems Total	14,459		15,569

Total	$	179,059	$	152,396

The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by Product Lines (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	3/31/2018		4/1/2017
Aerospace Segment
Electrical Power & Motion	$	72,678	$	72,444
Lighting & Safety	41,642		42,670
Avionics	33,023		9,136
Systems Certification	4,783		2,159
Structures	5,603		5,996
Other	6,871		4,422
Aerospace Total	164,600		136,827

Test Systems	14,459		15,569

Total	$	179,059	$	152,396

2)3) Inventories

Inventories are as follows:


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		December 31, 2016
(In thousands)					March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Finished Goods	$	31,140	$	28,792	$	29,032	$	35,193
Work in Progress	27,888		20,790		44,930		33,219
Raw Material	75,395		67,015		85,999		81,784
	$	134,423	$	116,597	$	159,961	$	150,196

3)4) Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table summarizes Property, Plant and Equipment as follows:


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		December 31, 2016		March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Land	$	11,189	$	11,112	$	11,266	$	11,237
Buildings and Improvements	79,941		79,191		82,156		81,872
Machinery and Equipment	100,524		93,683		107,959		105,827
Construction in Progress	7,281		8,182		9,953		9,761
	198,935		192,168		211,334		208,697
Less Accumulated Depreciation	76,289		69,356		86,572		82,867
	$	122,646	$	122,812	$	124,762	$	125,830

4)5) Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes acquired intangible assets as follows:


		July 1, 2017				December 31, 2016					March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	Weighted Average Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Weighted Average Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Patents	4 Years	$	2,146	$	1,544	$	2,146	$	1,450	11 Years	$	2,146	$	1,651	$	2,146	$	1,629
Non-compete Agreement	3 Years	2,500		1,229		2,500		979		4 Years	10,900		2,435		10,900		1,687
Trade Names	7 Years	10,433		3,626		10,189		3,153		10 Years	11,516		4,381		11,492		4,114
Completed and Unpatented Technology	5 Years	25,207		10,481		24,118		9,221		10 Years	38,155		12,938		38,114		11,931
Backlog	Less than 1 Year	11,384		11,277		11,224		11,224		2 Years	14,424		13,864		14,424		12,184
Customer Relationships	11 Years	97,245		26,394		97,046		23,093		15 Years	138,043		32,323		137,967		30,005
Total Intangible Assets	5 Years	$	148,915	$	54,551	$	147,223	$	49,120	12 Years	$	215,184	$	67,592	$	215,043	$	61,550

All acquired intangible assets other than goodwill and one trade name are being amortized. Amortization expense for acquired intangibles is summarized as follows:


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017
Amortization Expense	$	5,340	$	5,607	$	2,722	$	2,799	$	6,001	$	2,618

Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets expected for ~~2017~~2018 and for each of the next five years is summarized as follows:


(In thousands)
2017	$	10,756
2018	10,314		$	19,372
2019	9,935		16,700
2020	9,379		15,975
2021	9,333		14,065
2022	8,937		13,631
2023			12,463

5)6) Goodwill

The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July 1, 2017:~~March 31, 2018:


(In thousands)	December 31, 2016		Acquisition		Foreign Currency Translation		July 1, 2017		December 31, 2017		Acquisition/Adjustments			Foreign Currency Translation		March 31, 2018
Aerospace	$	115,207	$	1,804	$	554	$	117,565	$	125,645	$	(141	)	$	126	$	125,630
Test Systems	—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—
	$	115,207	$	1,804	$	554	$	117,565	$	125,645	$	(141	)	$	126	$	125,630

6)7) Long-term Debt and Notes Payable

The Company's Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Original Facility”) provided for a $350 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The maturity date of the Original Facility was January 13, 2021. On February 16, 2018, the Company modified and extended the Original Facility by entering into the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), which provides for a $500 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. A new lender was added to the facility as well. The outstanding balance of the Original Facility was rolled into the Agreement on the date of closing. The maturity date of the loans under the Agreement is February 16, 2023. At March 31, 2018, there was $267.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remains $231.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $500 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At March 31, 2018, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

The maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement) is 3.75 to 1, increasing to 4.50 to 1 for up to four fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement, subject to limtations. The Company’s leverage ratio was 3.19 to 1 at March 31, 2018. The Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus between 1.00% and 1.50% based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to between 0.10% and 0.20% on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio.

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement as amended are jointly and severally guaranteed by each domestic subsidiary of the Company other than a non-material subsidiary. The obligations are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets.

revolving credit facility and there remains $196.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $350 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At July 1, 2017, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

The maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement) is 3.5 to 1, increasing to 4.0 to 1 for up to two fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement. The Company’s leverage ratio was 1.77 to 1 at July 1, 2017. The Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus between 137.5 basis points and 225 basis points based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to between 17.5 basis points and 35 basis points on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company must also maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense) of 3.0 to 1 for the term of the Agreement. The Company’s interest coverage ratio was 24.2 to 1 at July 1, 2017.

In the event of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of the Company or any subsidiary, all unpaid principal and other amounts owing under the Agreement automatically become due and payable. Other events of default, such as failure to make payments as they become due and breach of financial and other covenants, change of control, judgments over a certain amount, and cross default under other agreements give the Agent the option to declare all such amounts immediately due and payable.

7)8) Product Warranties

In the ordinary course of business, the Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials and workmanship typically over periods ranging from 12 to 60 months. The Company determines warranty reserves needed by product line based on experience and current facts and circumstances. Activity in the warranty accrual is summarized as follows:


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	4,675		$	5,741		$	4,357		$	5,122		$	5,136		$	4,675
Acquisitions	359			—			359			—
Warranties Issued	832			1,206			365			545			567			467
Warranties Settled	(1,224		)	(1,290		)	(517		)	(405		)	(640		)	(707		)
Reassessed Warranty Exposure	(5		)	(296		)	73			99			52			(78		)
Balance at End of Period	$	4,637		$	5,361		$	4,637		$	5,361		$	5,115		$	4,357

8)9) Income Taxes

The effective tax rates were approximately ~~26.0%~~16.1% and ~~30.5% for the six months ended and 27.3% and 30.5%~~25.2% for the three months ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017, ~~and July 2, 2016,~~ respectively. The ~~2017~~2018 tax rates were favorably impacted ~~relative~~related to the applicable year's statutory rate by ~~excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options, decreases in foreign tax rates, and from~~ the federal research and development tax credit.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). The legislation significantly changed U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporate income tax rates, implementing a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Act permanently reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018.

While the Act provides for a territorial tax system, beginning in 2018, it includes the foreign-derived intangible income (“FDII”) and global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions. The Company elected to account for GILTI tax in the period in which it is incurred. The GILTI provisions require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary’s tangible assets. The GILTI tax expense resulted from required allocations of interest expense to the GILTI income, which created a U.S. foreign tax credit limitation. The FDII provisions allow for a deduction equal to a percentage of the foreign-derived intangible income of a domestic corporation. As a result of these provisions, net, the Company’s effective tax rate decreased approximately 0.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. The Company recognized provisional tax impacts related to the deemed repatriated earnings and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company did not make any adjustments to its provisional amounts included in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The company is still obtaining and analyzing historical records and finalizing its calculation of these provisional amounts. The accounting is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018 after the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed.

9)10) Shareholders’ Equity

The changes in shareholders’ equity for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:


				Number of Shares									Number of Shares
(Dollars and Shares in thousands)	Amount			Common Stock			Convertible Class B Stock			Amount			Common Stock			Convertible Class B Stock
Shares Authorized				40,000			15,000						40,000			15,000
Share Par Value				$	0.01		$	0.01					$	0.01		$	0.01
COMMON STOCK
Beginning of Period	$	297		21,955			7,665			$	297		22,861			6,852
Conversion of Class B Shares to Common Shares	—			686			(686		)	—			226			(226		)
Exercise of Stock Options	—			17			37			1			19			34
End of Period	$	297		22,658			7,016			$	298		23,106			6,660
ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL
Beginning of Period	$	64,752								$	67,791
Stock Compensation Expense	1,456									931
Exercise of Stock Options	317									159
End of Period	$	66,525								$	68,881
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Beginning of Period	$	(15,494	)							$	(13,352	)
Adoption of ASU 2018-02										(1,373		)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment	2,491									233
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax	262									215
End of Period	$	(12,741	)							$	(14,277	)
RETAINED EARNINGS
Beginning of Period	$	305,512								$	325,191
Adoption of ASU 2014-09										3,268
Adoption of ASU 2018-02										1,373
Net Income	19,272									3,294
End of Period	$	324,784								$	333,126
TREASURY STOCK
Beginning of Period	$	(17,618	)	(523		)				$	(50,000	)	(1,675		)
Purchase	(13,524		)	(450		)				—			—
End of Period	$	(31,142	)	(973		)				$	(50,000	)	(1,675		)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Beginning of Period	$	337,449								$	329,927

End of Period	$	347,723		21,685			7,016			$	338,028		21,431			6,660

On February 24, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of common stock (the “Buyback Program”). The Buyback Program ~~allows~~allowed the Company to purchase shares of its common stock in accordance with applicable securities laws on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The ~~Buyback Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Under this program, the~~ Company has repurchased approximately ~~973,000~~1,675,000 shares ~~for $31.1~~and has completed that program. On December 12, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase of up to $50 million. No amounts have been repurchased under the new program as of March 31, 2018.

~~10)~~11) Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding are as follows:

Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands) July 1,
2017 July 2,
2016 July 1,
2017 July 2,
2016
Weighted Average Shares - Basic 29,007
29,330
28,911
29,264
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options 1,128
960
1,178
962
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted 30,135
30,290
30,089
30,226

~~The 2016 information above has been adjusted to reflect the impact of the three-for-twenty Class B stock distribution to shareholders of record on October 11, 2016.~~



	Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2018	April 1, 2017
Weighted Average Shares - Basic	28,071	29,102
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options	637	1,080
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted	28,708	30,182

Stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they are out-of-the-money and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number of common shares covered by out-of-the-money stock options ~~at July 1, 2017 was approximately 474,000 shares.~~were insignificant as of March 31, 2018.

~~11)~~12) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and Other Comprehensive ~~Loss~~Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments	$	(6,106	)	$	(8,597	)	$	(4,232	)	$	(4,465	)
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Before Tax	(10,208		)	(10,611		)	(12,715		)	(12,988		)
Tax Benefit	3,573			3,714
Tax Benefit of Retirement Liability Adjustment							4,043			4,101
Adoption of ASU 2018-02							(1,373		)	—
Retirement Liability Adjustment – After Tax	(6,635		)	(6,897		)	(10,045		)	(8,887		)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(12,741	)	$	(15,494	)	$	(14,277	)	$	(13,352	)

The components of other comprehensive income are as follows:


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments	$	2,491		$	1,305		$	2,096		$	(511	)	$	233		$	395
Retirement Liability Adjustments:
Reclassifications to General and Administrative Expense:
Amortization of Prior Service Cost	202			219			102			109			101			101
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses	201			183			99			92			172			101
Tax Benefit	(141		)	(141		)	(70		)	(71		)	(58		)	(71		)
Retirement Liability Adjustment	262			261			131			130			215			131
Other Comprehensive Income	$	2,753		$	1,566		$	2,227		$	(381	)	$	448		$	526

~~12)~~13) Supplemental Retirement Plan and Related Post Retirement Benefits

The Company has two non-qualified supplemental retirement defined benefit plans (“SERP” and “SERP II”) for certain executive officers. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic pension cost for the plans.


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017
Service Cost	$	92	$	86	$	46	$	43	$	50	$	46
Interest Cost	448		450		224		225		225		224
Amortization of Prior Service Cost	194		207		97		103		97		97
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses	186		172		93		86		157		93
Net Periodic Cost	$	920	$	915	$	460	$	457	$	529	$	460

Participants in the SERP are entitled to paid medical, dental and long-term care insurance benefits upon retirement under the plan. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic cost recognized for those benefits:


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		July 1, 2017		July 2, 2016		March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017
Service Cost	$	4	$	2	$	2	$	1	$	4	$	2
Interest Cost	20		20		10		10		11		10
Amortization of Prior Service Cost	8		12		5		6		4		4
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses	15		11		6		6		15		8
Net Periodic Cost	$	47	$	45	$	23	$	23	$	34	$	24

~~13)~~14) Sales to Major Customers

The Company has a significant concentration of business with two major customers, each in excess of 10% of consolidated sales. The loss of either of these customers would significantly, negatively impact our sales and earnings.

Sales to these two customers represented 20% and ~~18%~~16% of consolidated sales for the ~~six months ended and 16% and 18% for the~~ three months ended ~~July 1, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Sales to these customers were in the Aerospace segment. Accounts receivable from these customers at ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 was approximately ~~$32.1~~$32.2 million. Sales to these two customers represented ~~22%~~24% and ~~15%~~18% of consolidated sales for the ~~six months ended and 21% and 16% for the~~ three months ended ~~July 2, 2016.~~April 1, 2017.

~~14)~~15) Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to prevail in any legal matter or should several legal matters be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, then the financial results of that particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.

On December 29, 2010, Lufthansa Technik AG (“Lufthansa”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany. Lufthansa’s claim asserts that our subsidiary, AES, sold, marketed, and brought into use in Germany a power supply system that infringes upon a German patent held by Lufthansa. ~~The relief~~Lufthansa sought ~~by Lufthansa includes~~an order requiring AES to stop selling and marketing the allegedly infringing power supply system, a recall of allegedly infringing products sold to commercial customers in Germany since November 26, 2003, and compensation for ~~damages.~~damages related to direct sales of the allegedly infringing power supply system in Germany (referred to as “direct sales”). The claim does not specify an estimate of damages and a related damages claim ~~would be~~is being pursued by Lufthansa in separate court ~~proceedings.~~proceedings in an action filed in July 2017, as further discussed below.

AES to provide certain financial information regarding direct sales of the infringing product in Germany to enable Lufthansa to make an estimate

of requested damages. Additionally, if Lufthansa provides the required bank guarantee specified in the decision, the Company may be required to offer a recall of products that are in the distribution channels in Germany. No such bank guarantee has been issued to date. As of ~~July 1, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, there are no products subject to the order in the distribution channels in Germany.

The Company appealed to the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe. On November 15, 2016, the Court issued its ruling and upheld the lower court’s decision. The Company ~~has~~ submitted a petition to grant AES leave for appeal to the German Federal Supreme Court. ~~The Company believes it has valid defenses to refute~~On April 18, 2018, the ~~decision. Should the~~German Federal Supreme Court ~~decide~~granted Astronics’ petition in part, namely with respect to ~~hear~~ the ~~case,~~part concerning the ~~appeal process~~amount of damages. We estimate that the German Federal Supreme Court will provide its ruling on this issue in late 2018 or in early 2019.

In July 2017, Lufthansa filed an action in the Regional State Court of Mannheim for payment of damages caused by the alleged patent infringement of AES, related to direct sales of the allegedly infringing product in Germany (associated with the original December 2010 action discussed above). In this action, which was served to AES on April 11, 2018, Lufthansa claims payment of approximately $6.2 million plus interest. According to AES's assessment, this claim is ~~estimated to extend up to two years.~~significantly higher than justified. We estimate AES’s potential exposure ~~related to this matter~~ to be approximately $1 million to $3 ~~million.~~million, and have recorded a reserve of $1 million associated with this matter which is management's best estimate of the probable exposure. Such amount is recorded within Other Accrued Expenses and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses in the accompanying financial statements as of and for the three month period ended March 31, 2018. An oral hearing has been scheduled on November 16, 2018. A first instance decision is in this matter is expected in early 2019.

On December 29, 2017, Lufthansa filed another infringement action against AES in the Regional State Court of Mannheim claiming that sales by AES to its international customers have infringed Lufthansa's patent if AES's customers later shipped the products to Germany (referred to as "indirect sales"). This action, therefore, addresses sales other than those covered by the action filed on December 29, 2010, discussed above. In this action, served on April 11, 2018, Lufthansa seeks an order obliging AES to provide information and accounting and a finding that AES owes damages for the attacked indirect sales. AES will vigorously defend against the action. No amount of claimed damages has been specified by Lufthansa and such amount is not quantifiable at this time. A first instance decision in this matter is expected in early 2019. As loss exposure is ~~not~~neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of ~~July 1, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

In December 2017, Lufthansa filed patent infringement cases in the United Kingdom and in France against AES. AES has been served in the case in France, but not in the case in the United Kingdom. In those cases, Lufthansa accuses AES of manufacturing, using, selling and offering for sale a power supply system that infringes upon a Lufthansa patent in those respective countries. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to these matters as of March 31, 2018.

On November 26, 2014, Lufthansa filed a complaint in the United States District for the Western District of Washington. Lufthansa’s complaint in ~~this~~that action alleges that AES manufactures, uses, sells and offers for sale a power supply system that infringes upon a U.S. patent held by Lufthansa. The patent at issue in the U.S. action is based on technology similar to that involved in the German action. On April 25, 2016, the Court issued its ruling on claim construction, holding that the sole independent claim in the patent is indefinite, rendering all claims in the patent indefinite. Based on this ruling, AES filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Court’s ruling that the patent is indefinite renders the patent invalid and unenforceable. On July 20, 2016, the U.S. District Court granted the motion for summary judgment and issued an order dismissing all claims against AES with prejudice.

Lufthansa ~~has filed an appeal with~~appealed the District Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ~~The Company believes~~On October 19, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, holding that ~~it has valid defenses to Lufthansa’s~~the sole independent claim of the patent is indefinite, rending all claims ~~and will vigorously contest~~on the ~~appeal. As loss~~patent indefinite. Lufthansa did not file a petition for en banc rehearing or petition the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Therefore, there is no longer a risk of exposure ~~is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Companyhas not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of July 1, 2017.~~from that lawsuit.

~~15)~~16) Segment Information

Below are the sales and operating profit by segment for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July~~March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2017 ~~and July 2, 2016~~ and a reconciliation of segment operating profit to income before income taxes. Operating profit is net sales less cost of products sold and other operating expenses excluding interest and corporate expenses. Cost of products sold and other operating expenses are directly identifiable to the respective segment.


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Sales
Aerospace	$	266,374		$	281,177		$	129,547		$	142,528		$	164,600		$	136,827
Less Intersegment Sales	—			(367		)	—			(27		)
Total Aerospace Sales	266,374			280,810			129,547			142,501
Total Test Systems Sales	37,136			43,146			21,567			21,925
Test Systems													14,459			15,569
Total Consolidated Sales	$	303,510		$	323,956		$	151,114		$	164,426		$	179,059		$	152,396
Operating Profit and Margins
Operating Profit (Loss) and Margins
Aerospace	$	33,738		$	43,542		$	13,984		$	24,851		$	13,115		$	19,754
	12.7		%	15.5		%	10.8		%	17.4		%	8.0		%	14.4		%
Test Systems	1,750			3,284			1,432			1,074			(1,929		)	318
	4.7		%	7.6		%	6.6		%	4.9		%	(13.3		)%	2.0		%
Total Operating Profit	35,488			46,826			15,416			25,925			11,186			20,072
	11.7		%	14.5		%	10.2		%	15.8		%	6.2		%	13.2		%
Deductions from Operating Profit
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income	2,313			2,143			1,180			1,056			2,331			1,133
Corporate Expenses and Other	7,115			6,616			3,667			3,314			4,929			3,448
Income Before Income Taxes	$	26,060		$	38,067		$	10,569		$	21,555		$	3,926		$	15,491

Total Assets:


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		December 31, 2016		March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Aerospace	$	529,369	$	500,892	$	628,129	$	621,047
Test Systems	77,382		76,575		113,467		90,859
Corporate	21,077		26,877		25,974		24,050
Total Assets	$	627,828	$	604,344	$	767,570	$	735,956

~~16)~~17) Fair Value

A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value is based upon an exit price model. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and involves consideration of factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company follows a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

On a Recurring Basis:

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The financial liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis consisted of contingent consideration related to a prior acquisition, valued at zero at December 31, 2016, determined using Level 3 inputs. This arrangement has expired and as of July 1, 2017 there are no financial liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis. There were no financial assets or liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 or ~~July 1, 2017.~~

March 31, 2018.

On a Non-recurring Basis:

The Company estimates the fair value of reporting units, utilizing unobservable Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs require significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices or observable inputs for assets of a similar nature. The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of reporting units utilizing unobservable inputs. The fair value measurement of the reporting unit under the step-one and step-two analysis of the quantitative goodwill impairment test are classified as Level 3 inputs.

Intangible assets that are amortized are evaluated for recoverability whenever adverse effects or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability test consists of comparing the undiscounted projected cash flows with the carrying amount. Should the carrying amount exceed undiscounted projected cash flows, an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds fair value. For the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible asset, the impairment test consists of comparing the fair value, determined using the relief from royalty method, with its carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized for the carrying amount in excess of its fair value.

At July 1, 2017, the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets classified using Level 3 inputs are comprised of the CCC goodwill and intangible assets acquired on April 3, 2017, which are currently valued based on management’s best estimates. When the accounting for the acquisition is finalized, these intangible assets will be valued using discounted cash flow methodology.

Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate fair value. The carrying value of the Company’s variable rate long-term debt instruments also approximates fair value due to the variable rate feature of these instruments. As of ~~July 1, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company concluded that no indicators of impairment relating to intangible assets or goodwill existed and an interim test was not performed.

~~17) Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-9,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, pursuant to the issuance of ASU 2015-14,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of Effective Date~~ issued in August 2015. The comprehensive new standard will supersede existing revenue recognition guidance and require revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Adoption of the new rules could affect the timing of revenue recognition for certain transactions. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. The Company will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method.

The adoption of this amendment may require us to accelerate the recognition of revenue as compared to current standards, for certain customers, in cases where we produce products unique to those customers; and for which we would have an enforceable right of payment for production completed to date. The Company has identified its revenue streams, reviewed the initial impacts of adopting the new standard on those revenue streams, and appointed a project management leader. The Company continues to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative impacts of the standard.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 02,~~ ~~Leases~~. The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The standard will require lessees to report most leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, while lessor accounting will remain substantially unchanged. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for existing leases, whereby the new rules will be applied to the earliest year presented. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,~~ ~~Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~, which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard provides guidance in a number of situations including, among others, settlement of zero-coupon bonds, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU also provides guidance for classifying cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires application using a retrospective transition method. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,~~ ~~Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The ASU requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The standard also narrows the definition of outputs. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under the new guidance, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 on a prospective basis with early adoption permitted. The Company would apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,~~ ~~Compensation-Retirement Benefits(Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost~~, which requires employers to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses. The other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit and net actuarial gains/losses, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in non-operating expenses. The ASU also stipulates that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. The effective date for adoption of this guidance begins on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that this standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.

18) ~~Acquisition~~Acquisitions

Astronics Custom Control Concepts, ~~LLC~~Inc.

On April 3, 2017, Astronics Custom Control Concepts Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all the assets and certain liabilities of Custom Control Concepts LLC (“CCC”), located in Kent, Washington. CCC is a provider of cabin management and in-flight entertainment systems for a range of aircraft. The total consideration for the transaction was approximately $10.2 million, net of $0.5 million in cash acquired. All of the goodwill and purchased intangible assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has ~~not~~ been finalized. CCC is included in our Aerospace segment.

Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certifications Corp.

On December 1, 2017, Astronics acquired substantially all of the assets of Telefonix Inc. and a related company, Product Development Technologies, LLC and its subsidiaries, to become Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certifications Corp. ("CSC"), primarily located in Waukegan and Lake Zurich, Illinois. CSC designs and manufactures advanced in-flight entertainment and connectivity equipment, and provides industry-leading design consultancy services for the global aerospace industry. The total consideration for the transaction was approximately $103.8 million, net of $0.2 million in cash acquired. All of the goodwill and purchased intangible assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. CSC is included in our Aerospace Segment. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has not yet been finalized.

Refer to the Company's annual report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 for further details on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. There have been no significant changes to the preliminary allocation of purchase price in the three months ended March 31, 2018.

The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, combines the consolidated results of operations of the Company with those of CSC as if the acquisition took place on January 1, 2017. The pro forma consolidated results include the impact of certain adjustments, including increased interest expense on acquisition debt, amortization of purchased intangible assets and income taxes.



	Unaudited
(in thousands, except earnings per share)	March 31, 2018		April 1, 2017 as reported		April 1, 2017 Pro Forma
Sales	$	179,059	$	152,396	$	164,604
Net income	$	3,294	$	11,587	$	10,352
Basic earnings per share	$	0.12	$	0.40	$	0.36
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.11	$	0.38	$	0.34

The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been in effect for the three months ended April 1, 2017. In addition, they are not intended to be a projection of future results.



Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(The following should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.)

OVERVIEW

Astronics Corporation (“Astronics” or the “Company”) is a leading ~~supplier~~provider of ~~products~~advanced technologies to the global aerospace, defense, electronics and semiconductor industries. Our products and services include advanced, high-performance electrical power generation, distribution and motion systems, lighting &and safety systems, avionics products, aircraft structures, systems certification, aircraft structures, and automated test systems.

Our Aerospace segment designs and manufactures products for the global aerospace industry. Product lines include lighting &and safety systems, electrical power generation, distribution and motion systems, aircraft structures, avionics products, systems certification, connectivity and other products. Our Aerospace customers are the airframe manufacturers ("OEM") that build aircraft for the commercial, military and general aviation markets, suppliers to those OEM’s, aircraft operators such as airlines and branches of the U.S. Department of Defense as well as the Federal Aviation Administration and airport operators. Our Test Systems segment designs, develops, manufactures and maintains automated test systems that support the semiconductor, aerospace, communications and weapons test systems as well as training and simulation devices for both commercial and military applications. In the Test Systems segment, Astronics’ products are sold to a global customer base including OEM's and prime government contractors for both electronics and military products.

Our strategy is to increase our value by developing technologies and capabilities either internally or through acquisition, and using those capabilities to provide innovative solutions to the aerospace and defense, semiconductor and other markets where our technology can be beneficial.

Important factors affecting our growth and profitability are the rate at which new aircraft are produced, government funding of military programs, our ability to have our products designed into new aircraft and the rates at which aircraft owners, including commercial airlines, refurbish or install upgrades to their aircraft. New aircraft build rates and aircraft owners spending on upgrades and refurbishments is cyclical and dependent on the strength of the global economy. Once designed into a new aircraft, the spare parts business is frequently retained by the Company. Future growth and profitability of the Test Systems business is dependent on developing and procuring new and follow-on business in commercial electronics and semiconductor markets as well as with the military. The nature of our Test Systems business is such that it pursues large multi-year projects. There can be significant periods of time between orders in this business which may result in large fluctuations of sales and profit levels and backlog from period to period.

ACQUISITIONS

Astronics Custom Control Concepts, Inc.

On April 3, 2017, Astronics Custom Control Concepts Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all the assets and certain liabilities of Custom Control Concepts LLC (“CCC”), located in Kent, Washington. CCC is a provider of cabin management and in-flight entertainment ~~(IFE)~~ systems for a range of aircraft. The total consideration for the transaction was approximately $10.2 million, net of $0.5 million in cash acquired. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has been finalized. CCC is included in our Aerospace segment.

Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certifications Corp.

On December 1, 2017, Astronics acquired substantially all of the assets of Telefonix Inc. and a related company, Product Development Technologies, LLC and its subsidiaries, to become Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certifications Corp. ("CSC"), primarily located in Waukegan and Lake Zurich, Illinois. CSC designs and manufactures advanced in-flight entertainment and connectivity equipment, and provides industry leading design consultancy services for the global aerospace industry. Under the terms of the Agreement, the total consideration for the transaction was approximately $103.8 million, net of $0.2 million in cash acquired. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has not been finalized. CSC is included in our Aerospace segment.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Sales	$	303,510		$	323,956		$	151,114		$	164,426		$	179,059		$	152,396
Gross Profit (sales less cost of products sold)	$	72,467		$	84,318		$	34,150		$	44,835		$	37,132		$	38,317
Gross Margin	23.9		%	26.0		%	22.6		%	27.3		%	20.7		%	25.1		%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses	$	44,094		$	44,108		$	22,401		$	22,224		$	30,500		$	21,383
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales	14.5		%	13.6		%	14.8		%	13.5		%	17.0		%	14.0		%
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income	$	2,313		$	2,143		$	1,180		$	1,056		$	2,331		$	1,133
Effective Tax Rate	26.0		%	30.5		%	27.3		%	30.5		%	16.1		%	25.2		%
Net Income	$	19,272		$	26,465		$	7,685		$	14,980		$	3,294		$	11,587

A discussion by segment can be found at “Segment Results of Operations and Outlook” in this MD&A.

CONSOLIDATED ~~SECOND~~FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

Consolidated sales were ~~down $13.3~~up $26.7 million from the same period last year. Aerospace segment sales of ~~$129.5~~$164.6 million were ~~down $13.0~~up $27.8 million and Test Systems segment sales of ~~$21.6~~$14.5 million were down ~~$0.3~~$1.1 million. Organic revenue was $154.0 million, up 1% compared with the same prior year period. The 2018 first quarter included $25.1 million in sales from the Acquired Businesses all in the Aerospace segment.

Consolidated cost of products sold was $141.9 million in the first quarter of 2018 compared with $114.1 million in the first quarter of 2017. Consolidated cost of products sold in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017 decreased $2.6 million~~2018 increased due to ~~$117.0 million compared with $119.6~~higher sales, as well as several expenses that are expected to decrease or not recur through the remainder of 2018, including $1.3 million in expense related to the ~~second quarter~~fair value step-up of ~~2016. The decrease was~~inventory from the ~~result of lower organic sales volumes offset by the additional~~Acquired Businesses, which is now fully expensed. Another factor impacting cost of products sold in the quarter was a program charge of $2.1 million recognized due to the revision of estimated costs to complete a long-term contract assumed with the acquisition of the CCC business. Cost of products sold was impacted as well by ~~CCC. Organic~~the change in product mix, higher organic Engineering and Development (“("E~~&D”~~&D") costs and market pricing pressures primarily relating to cabin power, which increased costs of products sold.

Organic E&D costs were ~~$21.7~~$24.3 million in the quarter, ~~up from $21.4~~compared with $22.9 million ~~of E&D costs~~ in last year’s ~~second~~first quarter. As a percent of organic sales, organic E&D costs were ~~14.4%~~15.8% and ~~13.0%~~15.0% in the ~~second~~first quarters of 2018 and 2017, ~~and 2016,~~ respectively. ~~CCC~~The Acquired Businesses incurred E&D costs of ~~$1.2~~$4.6 million ~~since its acquisition.~~in the first quarter, which equates to 18.3% of acquired revenue.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were ~~$22.4~~up $9.1 million to $30.5 million, or ~~14.8%~~17.0% of sales, in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 compared with ~~$22.2~~$21.4 million, or ~~13.5%~~14.0% of sales, in the same period last year. Acquired Businesses contributed $7.1 million to SG&A, including $3.4 million of intangible asset amortization expense. Also contributing to higher SG&A was a $1.0 million litigation reserve recorded during the quarter for an ongoing matter. Corporate expenses increased by $1.5 million due to increased headcount, legal and accounting costs.

The effective tax rate for the quarter was ~~27.3%~~16.1%, compared with ~~30.5%~~25.2% in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2017. The 2018 first quarter ~~2017~~ tax rate was favorably impacted by ~~excess~~the decrease in the Federal statutory tax ~~benefits associated with employee share-based compensation, decreases in foreign tax rates, and~~rate partially offset by the elimination of the domestic production activities deduction resulting from the ~~federal research~~Tax Cuts and ~~development tax credit.~~Jobs Act.

Net income ~~for the quarter~~ was ~~$7.7 million, compared to $15.0 million in the second quarter of the prior year. Diluted earnings per share was $0.26 cents and $0.50 cents in the second quarters of 2017 and 2016 respectively.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS~~

~~Consolidated sales for the first six months of 2017 decreased by $20.4~~$3.3 million, or ~~6.3%, to $303.5 million. Aerospace segment sales were down $14.4~~$0.11 per diluted share compared with $11.6 million or ~~5.1% year-over-year, to $266.4 million, while Test Systems segment sales were down $6.0 million, or 13.9% to $37.1 million.~~

Consolidated costs of products sold decreased $8.6 million to $231.0 million from $239.6 million in the first six months of 2015. Organic E&D costs were 14.7% of sales, or $44.6 million, compared with $44.6 million, or 13.8% of sales,$0.38 per diluted share in the prior ~~year’s first six months. SG&A expenses~~year.

Bookings were ~~$44.1~~strong at $196.2 million, ~~or 14.5%~~for a book-to-bill ratio of ~~sales, in~~1.10:1. The Company ended the first ~~six months~~quarter with record backlog of ~~2017 compared with $44.1 million, or 13.6%~~$398.6 million. Approximately 89% of ~~sales,~~backlog is expected to ship in ~~the same period last year.~~

The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2017 was 26.0%, compared with 30.5% in the second six months of 2016. The tax rate in the first six months of 2017 was favorably impacted by excess tax benefits associated with employee share-based compensation and decreases in foreign tax rates, and from the federal research and development tax credit.

~~Net income for the first half of 2017 totaled $19.3 million, or $0.64 per diluted share.~~

During the second quarter, the Company repurchased approximately 302,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $9.1 million under its share repurchase program. Since the inception of the program in February 2016, the Company has repurchased approximately 973,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $31.1 million.2018.

CONSOLIDATED OUTLOOK

Consolidated sales in ~~2017~~2018 are forecasted to be in the range of ~~$625~~$765 million to ~~$645~~$815 million, ~~which represents a decline from the high end of the previous range. The Aerospace forecast has been impacted by program timing, comparatively slower wide body retrofit and new build activity, combined~~ with delayed decisions regarding passenger entertainment options by the airlines. While quoting activity remains very high, it looks increasingly like these issues will continue to pose a challenge for the Aerospace business for the remainder of 2017. Additionally, some significant new programs we have been pursuing in the Test business are now taking longer than anticipated, somewhat reducing 2017 expectations. Approximately $535$650 million to ~~$550~~$680 million ~~of revenue is~~ expected from the Aerospace segment and ~~$90~~$115 million to ~~$95~~$135 million from the Test ~~Systems~~ segment.

Consolidated backlog at ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 was ~~$265.6~~$398.6 million, ~~of which approximately $204.6~~up from $393.7 million at December 31, 2017. Approximately $356.1 million is expected to ship in ~~2017.~~2018.

The effective tax rate for ~~2017~~2018 is expected to be in the range of ~~28%~~18% to ~~31%~~21%.

~~Capital~~Expectations for capital equipment spending in ~~2017 is expected~~2018 are unchanged from a range of $24 million to $28 million.

E&D costs for 2018 continue to be expected in the range of ~~$21~~$110 million to ~~$25~~$115 million.

~~E&D costs are expected to be in the range of $96 million to $99 million including the engineering costs from the acquired Custom Control Concepts business.~~

SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK

Operating profit, as presented below, is sales less cost of products sold and other operating expenses, excluding interest expense and other corporate expenses. Cost of products sold and other operating expenses are directly identifiable to the respective segment. Operating profit is reconciled to earnings before income taxes in Note 1516 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in this report.

AEROSPACE SEGMENT


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Sales													$	164,600		$	136,827
Aerospace	$	266,374		$	281,177		$	129,547		$	142,528
Less Intersegment Sales	—			(367		)	—			(27		)
Total Aerospace Sales	$	266,374		$	280,810		$	129,547		$	142,501
Operating Profit	$	33,738		$	43,542		$	13,984		$	24,851		$	13,115		$	19,754
Operating Margin	12.7		%	15.5		%	10.8		%	17.4		%	8.0		%	14.4		%

Aerospace Sales by Market
(In thousands)
Commercial Transport	$	208,079		$	229,818		$	98,355		$	116,423		$	133,050		$	109,723
Military	30,931			26,254			15,785			13,973			14,015			15,146
Business Jet	18,251			14,232			10,716			7,707			10,664			7,536
Other	9,113			10,506			4,691			4,398			6,871			4,422
	$	266,374		$	280,810		$	129,547		$	142,501		$	164,600		$	136,827
Aerospace Sales by Product Line
(In thousands)
Electrical Power & Motion	$	135,040		$	150,957		$	62,597		$	75,564		$	72,678		$	72,444
Lighting & Safety	85,316			82,544			42,646			41,979			41,642			42,670
Avionics	20,076			16,818			10,940			9,344			33,023			9,136
Systems Certification	4,952			9,997			2,793			5,391			4,783			2,159
Structures	11,877			9,988			5,880			5,825			5,603			5,996
Other	9,113			10,506			4,691			4,398			6,871			4,422
	$	266,374		$	280,810		$	129,547		$	142,501		$	164,600		$	136,827


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		December 31, 2016		March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Total Assets	$	529,369	$	500,892	$	628,129	$	621,047
Backlog	$	215,648	$	219,146	$	305,977	$	298,604

AEROSPACE ~~SECOND~~FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

Aerospace segment sales ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$13.0~~$27.8 million, or ~~9.1%~~20.3%, when compared with the prior year’s ~~second~~first quarter to ~~$129.5~~$164.6 million. ~~CCC~~The Acquired Businesses contributed ~~$3.5~~$25.1 million in sales in the ~~2017 second~~2018 first quarter.

~~Electrical Power & Motion~~ Organic sales ~~decreased $13.0~~increased $2.7 million, or ~~17.2%,~~2%.

Avionics sales were up $23.9 million, due to ~~lower sales~~the addition of ~~in-seat and cabin power products,~~the Acquired Businesses, which ~~have been impacted by program timing, comparatively slower wide body retrofit and new build activity, combined~~contributed $22.5 million, coupled with ~~delayed decisions regarding passenger entertainment options. Systems~~an organic increase in antenna sales. System Certification sales ~~decreased~~increased by $2.6 million on ~~lower~~higher project activity. ~~Avionics sales~~Sales of other products were up ~~$1.6~~$2.4 million, ~~and included~~due primarily to the ~~CCC acquisition which~~Acquired Businesses. These increases were offset ~~lower antenna sales.~~by a decrease in Lighting & Safety sales of $1.0 million.

Aerospace operating profit for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$14.0~~$13.1 million, or ~~10.8%~~8.0% of sales, compared with ~~$24.9~~$19.8 million, or ~~17.4%~~14.4% of sales, in the same period last year. Organic Aerospace E&D costs were $21.3 million compared with $20.3 million in the same period last year. The Acquired Businesses incurred E&D costs of $4.6 million during the quarter.

Aerospace operating profit was negatively impacted by ~~lower organic sales, $0.9 million operating loss from~~several expenses that are expected to decrease or not recur through the ~~CCC~~remainder of 2018. As is typical during the first few quarters following an acquisition, ~~and increased organic E&D costs. Organic Aerospace E&D~~non-cash costs were ~~$19.8 million compared with $19.0~~higher than what is expected over the long-term, as short-lived intangible assets are amortized and the fair value step-up costs relating to the acquired inventory is expensed. Intangible asset amortization expense for the Acquired Businesses was $3.4 million in the ~~same period last~~first quarter and fair value inventory step-up expense was $1.3 million. The inventory step-up was fully expensed in the quarter and intangible asset amortization expense related to the Acquired Businesses is expected to decline to $2.2 million in the second quarter and settle at a run rate of $1.6 million beginning in the third quarter of this year. ~~CCC incurred E&D costs~~

Another factor impacting operating profit in the quarter was the program charge of ~~$1.2~~$2.1 million ~~during~~and the ~~quarter.~~$1.0 million litigation reserve, as discussed above. Operating margin was also negatively impacted by change in product mix, coupled with market pricing pressures primarily relating to cabin power.

Aerospace orders in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$134.8 million.~~up 47% to $180.9 million compared with the prior year period, and up 1% compared with the trailing fourth quarter of 2017. The book-to-bill ratio was 1.10:1 for the quarter. Backlog was ~~$215.6~~$306.0 million at the end of the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~

~~AEROSPACE YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS~~

~~Aerospace segment sales decreased by $14.4~~2018, up from $298.6 million ~~or 5.1%, when compared with the prior year’s first six months to $266.4 million.~~

Electrical Power & Motion sales decreased $15.9 million, or 10.5%, and Systems Certifications sales decreased $5.0 million, both for similar reasons as in the quarter. These declines were partially offset by $3.3 million higher Avionics sales related to the CCC acquisition, as well as a $2.7 million increase in sales of Lighting and Safety products.

Aerospace operating profit for the first six months of 2017 was $33.7 million, or 12.7% of sales, compared with $43.5 million, or 15.5% of sales, in the same period last year. Aerospace operating profit was negatively impacted by lower sales volumes and the operating loss from the acquired CCC business. E&D costs for Aerospace were $41.3 million (inclusive of $1.2 million related to the acquired CCC business) and $39.4 million in the first six of 2017 and 2016, respectively. Aerospace SG&A expense remained consistent at ~~$31.1 million in the first six months of 2017 as compared with 2016.~~December 31, 2017.

AEROSPACE OUTLOOK

We expect ~~2017~~2018 sales for our Aerospace segment to be in the range of ~~$535~~$650 million to ~~$550~~$680 million. The Aerospace segment’s backlog at the end of the first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$215.6~~$306.0 million with approximately ~~$168.5~~$281.0 million expected to be shipped over the remaining part of ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$195.4~~$293.7 million is expected to ship over the next 12 months.

TEST SYSTEMS SEGMENT


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			July 1, 2017			July 2, 2016			March 31, 2018			April 1, 2017
Sales	$	37,136		$	43,146		$	21,567		$	21,925		$	14,459		$	15,569
Operating profit (loss)	$	1,750		$	3,284		$	1,432		$	1,074		$	(1,929	)	$	318
Operating Margin	4.7		%	7.6		%	6.6		%	4.9		%	(13.3		)%	2.0		%

Test Systems Sales by Market
(In thousands)
Semiconductor	$	11,711		$	16,985		$	7,080		$	9,848		$	7,060		$	4,631
Aerospace & Defense	25,425			26,161			14,487			12,077			7,399			10,938
	$	37,136		$	43,146		$	21,567		$	21,925		$	14,459		$	15,569


(In thousands)	July 1, 2017		December 31, 2016		March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Total Assets	$	77,382	$	76,575	$	113,467	$	90,859
Backlog	$	49,930	$	38,887	$	92,635	$	95,086

TEST SYSTEMS ~~SECOND~~FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

Sales in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 decreased approximately ~~$0.3~~$1.1 million to ~~$21.6~~$14.5 million compared with the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, a decrease of ~~1.6%~~7.1%. ~~Sales~~The $2.4 million increase in sales to the Semiconductor market ~~decreased $2.8~~was offset by a $3.5 million ~~and~~decrease in sales to the Aerospace ~~and~~& Defense market ~~increased $2.5~~when compared with the prior-year period.

The operating loss was $1.9 million compared with $0.3 million in operating profit, or 2.0% of sales, in last year’s first quarter. The lower margin was driven by an unfavorable sales mix compared with the same period ~~in 2016.~~

~~Operating profit was $1.4 million, or 6.6% of sales, compared with $1.1 million, or 4.9% of sales, in~~ last ~~year’s second quarter.~~year. E&D costs were ~~$2.0~~$3.0 million, ~~down~~up from ~~$2.4~~$2.5 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2016. Test Systems SG&A expense decreased to $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2017 compared with $3.2 million in the same period last year.~~2017.

Orders for the Test Systems segment in the quarter were ~~$23.9~~$15.3 million, for a book-to-bill ratio of ~~1.11~~1.06:1 for the quarter. Backlog was ~~$49.9~~$92.6 million at the end of the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~

~~TEST SYSTEMS YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS~~

~~Sales in~~2018, down from $95.1 million at the ~~first six months~~end of 2017 decreased 13.9% to $37.1 million compared with sales of $43.1 million for the same period in 2016, due to lower sales to the Semiconductor market. Sales to the Semiconductor market decreased $5.3 million compared with the same period in 2016.

Operating profit was $1.8 million, or 4.7% of sales, compared with $3.3 million, or 7.6% of sales, in the first six months of 2016. E&D costs were $4.5 million in the first six months of 2017 compared with $5.3 million in the prior year period. SG&A costs declined to $5.9 million in the first six months of 2017 compared with $6.4 million in the same period in 2016.2017.

TEST SYSTEMS OUTLOOK

We expect sales for the Test Systems segment for ~~2017~~2018 to be in the range of ~~$90~~$115 million to ~~$95~~$135 million. The Test Systems segment’s backlog at the end of the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$49.9~~$92.6 million, with approximately ~~$36.1~~$75.0 million expected to be shipped over the remaining part of ~~2017~~2018 and approximately ~~$46.6~~$77.4 million scheduled to ship over the next 12 months.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Operating Activities:

Cash ~~provided~~used by operating activities totaled ~~$4.5~~$1.1 million for the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2017,~~2018, as compared with ~~$23.3~~$6.4 million in cash provided by operating activities during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Cash flow from operating activities decreased compared with the same period of ~~2016~~2017 primarily due to the impact of lower net income and higher increases in net operating assets for the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2017~~2018 when compared with the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2016.~~2017.

Investing Activities:

Cash used for investing activities ~~included $10.2 million for the acquisition~~was comprised of ~~CCC, as well as~~ capital expenditures ~~which were $5.8~~of $4.3 million for the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2017~~2018 compared with ~~$6.2~~$2.8 million used in the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. The Company expects capital spending in ~~2017~~2018 to be in the range of ~~$21~~$24 million to ~~$25~~$28 million.

Financing Activities:

The primary financing activities in ~~2017 relate~~the first three months of 2018 related to net borrowings onfrom our senior credit facility of $5.0 million and $0.5 million of costs incurred related to ~~fund operations,~~ the ~~acquisition of CCC and purchases of treasury stock as part~~execution of the ~~buyback program announced on~~Agreement in February 2018. The primary financing activities in the first three months of 2017 related to the net repayments of the senior facility and other debt of $6.7 million and $4.4 million in share repurchases.

The Company’s cash needs for working capital, debt service and capital equipment during the remainder of 2018 is expected to be met by cash flows from operations and cash balances and, if necessary, utilization of the revolving credit facility.

On February 24, 2016, ~~under which~~ the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of common stock (the “Buyback Program”). The Buyback Program allowed the Company to purchase shares of its common stock in accordance with applicable securities laws on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The Company has repurchased approximately 1,675,000 shares and has completed that program. On December 12, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase of up to $50 million of common stock. No amounts have been repurchased under the new program as of March 31, 2018.

The Company's Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Original Facility”) provided for a $350 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The maturity date of the original facility was January 13, 2021. On February 16, 2018, the Company modified and extended the Original Facility by entering into the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), which provides for a $500 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. A new lender was added to the facility as well. The outstanding balance in the Original Facility were rolled into the Agreement on the date of closing. The maturity date of the loans under the Agreement is February 16, 2023. At March 31, 2018, there was $267.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remains $231.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $500 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At March 31, 2018, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

The maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement) is 3.75 to 1, increasing to 4.50 to 1 for up to four fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement, subject to limitations. The Company’s leverage ratio was 3.19 to 1 at March 31, 2018. The Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus between 1.00% and 1.50% based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to between 0.10% and 0.20% on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio.

The Company's Credit Agreement consists of a $350 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. On January 13, 2016, the Company amended the Agreement to add a new lender and extend the maturity date of the credit facility from September 26, 2019 to January 13, 2021. At July 1, 2017 there was $152.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remains $196.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $350 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At July 1, 2017, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

BACKLOG

The Company’s backlog at ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 was ~~$265.6~~$398.6 million compared with ~~$258.0~~$393.7 million at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~$293.8~~$252.7 million at ~~July 2, 2016.~~April 1, 2017.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

The following table represents contractual obligations as of ~~July 1, 2017:~~March 31, 2018:


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
(In thousands)	Total		2017		2018-2019		2019-2020		After 2020		Total		2018		2019-2020		2021-2022		After 2022
Long-term Debt	$	162,966	$	1,335	$	4,571	$	156,164	$	896	$	276,105	$	2,103	$	4,024	$	2,978	$	267,000
Purchase Obligations	98,347		87,309		11,038		—		—		128,484		123,360		5,124		—		—
Interest on Long-term Debt	15,568		2,269		8,784		4,503		12		43,310		8,771		17,453		16,766		320
Supplemental Retirement Plan and Post Retirement Obligations	22,347		207		826		811		20,503		26,344		314		833		812		24,385
Operating Leases	6,614		1,976		4,501		137		—		17,449		3,518		6,607		3,481		3,843
Other Long-term Liabilities	169		30		48		29		62		239		122		26		32		59
Total Contractual Obligations	$	306,011	$	93,126	$	29,768	$	161,644	$	21,473	$	491,931	$	138,188	$	34,067	$	24,069	$	295,607

Notes to Contractual Obligations Table

Purchase Obligations — Purchase obligations are comprised of the Company’s commitments for goods and services in the normal course of business.

Long-Term Debt — See Part 1 Financial Information, Item 1 Financial Statements, Note 6,7, Long-Term Debt and Notes Payable included in this report.

Operating Leases — Operating lease obligations are primarily related to the Company's facility leases.

MARKET RISK

The Company believes that there have been no material changes in the current year regarding the market risk information for its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Although the majority of our sales, expenses and cash flows are transacted in U.S. dollars, we have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to the Euro and the Canadian dollar. The Company believes that the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates in ~~2017~~2018 have not been significant.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in this report for the Company’s critical accounting policies with respect to revenue recognition. For a complete discussion of the Company’s other critical accounting policies, refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016 for a complete discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies.~~2017.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-9,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, pursuant~~Refer to ~~the issuance of ASU 2015-14,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of Effective Date~~ issued in August 2015. The comprehensive new standard will supersede existing revenue recognition guidance and require revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. AdoptionNote 1 of the new rules could affect the timing of revenue recognition for certain transactions. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. The Company will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method.

~~The adoption of this amendment may require us~~Notes to accelerate the recognition of revenue as compared to current standards, for certain customers, in cases where we produce products unique to those customers; and for which we would have an enforceable right of payment for production completed to date. The Company has identified its revenue streams, reviewed the initial impacts of adopting the new standard on those revenue streams, and appointed a project management leader. The Company continues to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative impacts of the standard.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,~~ ~~Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The ASU requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The standard also narrows the definition of outputs. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under the new guidance, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. This ASU is effective for

~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 on a prospective basis with early adoption permitted. The Company would apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.~~

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,~~ ~~Compensation-Retirement Benefits~~ (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires employers to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses. The other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit and net actuarial gains/losses, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to beConsolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in ~~non-operating expenses. The ASU also stipulates that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. The effective date for adoption of~~ this ~~guidance begins on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that this standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.~~report.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information included in this report that does not consist of historical facts, including statements accompanied by or containing words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “expected,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “approximate,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “anticipates,” “presume” and “assume,” are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to several factors, risks and uncertainties, the impact or occurrence of which could cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results described in the forward-looking statements. Certain of these factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in the sections of this report entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” New factors, risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time that may affect the forward-looking statements made herein. Given these factors, risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on ~~forward-looking~~forward-

looking statements as predictive of future results. We disclaim any obligation to update the forward-looking statements made in this report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See Market Risk in Item 2, above.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures


a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) by others within our organization to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision andThe Company’s management, with the participation of ~~our management, including our~~the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, ~~we conducted an evaluation of~~has evaluated the effectiveness of ~~our~~the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~July 1, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Based on ~~this~~that evaluation, ~~as a result of~~ the ~~material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our~~Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that ~~our~~the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective as of ~~July 1, 2017.~~

Notwithstanding the material weakness discussed below, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

During the quarter ended July 1, 2017, management discovered a material weakness in the design of information technology change controls over a report writing application. Additionally, management identified deficiencies in certain review controls over the financial statement consolidation process, which when aggregated along with the information technology change controls matter described above, aggregated to a material weakness over the financial statement close process as of DecemberMarch 31, ~~2016. Management does not expect adjustments to any previously issued financial statements as a result of these deficiencies.~~

The Company has begun implementing changes to the design and application of new controls as well as make significant changes to the design of existing controls over information technology as well as controls related to the financial statement consolidation process. The Company has made progress towards remediation of the material weakness as of the date of this filing and expects to complete remediation by December 31, 2017. We will continue the process of enhancing our controls as well as continue to test their effectiveness over the remainder of 2017.

We will be filing an amendment to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and an amendment to the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2017 to reflect the conclusion by our management that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of those dates, and that there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the periods covered by these reports.2018.


b)	Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). Although the adoption of ASU 2014-09 had an immaterial impact on our financial statements, we implemented certain changes to our related revenue recognition control activities, including the development of new policies, based on the five-step model provided in the revenue standard.

There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

OnIn February 6, 2015, the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany rendered its decision that the patent was infringed. The judgment does not require AES to recall products that are already installed in aircraft or have been sold to other end users. On July 15, 2015, Lufthansa advised AES of their intention to enforce the accounting provisions of the decision, which required AES to provide certain financial information regarding direct sales of the infringing product in Germany to enable Lufthansa to make an estimate of requested damages. Additionally, if Lufthansa provides the required bank guarantee specified in the decision, the Company may be required to offer a recall of products that are in the distribution channels in Germany. No such bank guarantee has been issued to date. As of ~~July 1, 2017~~March 31, 2018, there are no products subject to the order in the distribution channels in Germany.

~~Other than this proceeding, we are not party to any significant pending legal proceedings~~from that ~~management believes will result in material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.~~lawsuit.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds

(c) The following table summarizes our purchases of our common stock for the quarter ended ~~July 1, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

Period (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased (b) Average Price Paid Per Share (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (d) Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Program (1)
April 1, 2017 -
April 29, 2017
20,474 $30.45 20,474 $27,345,000
April 30, 2017 -
May 27, 2017 (2)
123,538 $30.20 120,930 $23,694,000
May 28, 2017 -
July 1, 2017
160,343 $30.16 160,343 $18,858,000



Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share	(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Program
January 1, 2018 - January 27, 2018	—	—	—	—
January 28, 2018 - February 24, 2018	—	—	—	—
February 25, 2018 - March 31, 2018 (1)	3,418	$40.58	—	—

In connection with the exercise of stock options, we accept, from time to time, delivery of shares to pay the exercise price of stock options.

(1) On ~~February 24, 2016, the Company’s Board~~March 13, 2018, we accepted delivery of ~~Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of common stock.~~

~~(2) There were 2,608~~3,418 shares ~~transferred to us by employees~~at $40.58 in connection with the exercise of stock options.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit 31.1		Section 302 Certification - Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2		Section 302 Certification - Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 101.1*		Instance Document

Exhibit 101.2*		Schema Document

Exhibit 101.3*		Calculation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.4*		Labels Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.5*		Presentation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.6*		Definition Linkbase Document



*	Submitted electronically herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



		ASTRONICS CORPORATION
		(Registrant)
Date:	~~August 16, 2017~~May 10, 2018	By:	/s/ David C. Burney
			David C. Burney Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

2930