Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q
(Mark one)
þQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013
or
oTransition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the Transition Period from                     to     ��               .
Commission File Number 1-15202

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 22-1867895
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 (203) 629-3000 
 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 
   
 None 
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o     No þ
Number of shares of common stock, $.20 par value, outstanding as of October 31, 2012April 30, 2013: 135,815,797136,036,887
 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


Table of Contents

Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
September 30,
2012
 December 31,
2011
(Unaudited)  
Assets      
Investments:      
Fixed maturity securities$11,892,412
 $11,312,037
$11,665,117
 $11,943,956
Equity securities available for sale425,322
 443,439
Equity securities399,386
 376,022
Arbitrage trading account417,446
 397,312
701,223
 329,077
Investment funds747,638
 680,638
793,603
 809,689
Loans receivable371,408
 263,187
456,533
 401,961
Real estate433,686
 342,905
588,777
 606,735
Total investments14,287,912
 13,439,518
14,604,639
 14,467,440
Cash and cash equivalents1,189,564
 911,742
945,492
 905,670
Premiums and fees receivable1,409,246
 1,206,204
1,504,535
 1,440,752
Due from reinsurers1,309,463
 1,215,679
1,441,389
 1,450,348
Accrued investment income131,790
 133,776
126,577
 127,230
Prepaid reinsurance premiums311,355
 258,271
345,329
 316,309
Deferred policy acquisition costs400,727
 364,937
425,070
 404,047
Real estate, furniture and equipment258,368
 262,275
271,012
 267,227
Goodwill87,865
 87,865
107,529
 87,865
Trading account receivables from brokers and clearing organizations387,352
 318,240
28,720
 446,873
Current federal and foreign income taxes5,122
 9,670
Other assets154,148
 195,696
320,342
 242,135
Total assets$19,932,912
 $18,403,873
$20,120,634
 $20,155,896
   
Liabilities and Equity      
Liabilities:      
Reserves for losses and loss expenses$9,562,877
 $9,337,134
$9,809,843
 $9,751,086
Unearned premiums2,480,449
 2,189,575
2,635,995
 2,474,847
Due to reinsurers303,424
 241,204
298,557
 316,388
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased149,405
 62,514
79,965
 121,487
Deferred federal and foreign income taxes69,968
 2,835
Federal and foreign income taxes - current and deferred104,810
 82,801
Other liabilities912,357
 866,229
844,297
 959,080
Junior subordinated debentures243,154
 242,997
243,258
 243,206
Senior notes and other debt1,877,431
 1,500,503
1,693,279
 1,871,535
Total liabilities15,599,065
 14,442,991
15,710,004
 15,820,430
Equity:      
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share:      
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - none
 

 
Common stock, par value $.20 per share:      
Authorized 500,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, net of treasury shares, 135,956,622 and 137,520,019 shares, respectively47,024
 47,024
Authorized 500,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, net of treasury shares, 136,028,287 and 136,017,732 shares, respectively47,024
 47,024
Additional paid-in capital936,915
 941,109
949,926
 945,166
Retained earnings4,800,537
 4,491,162
4,922,178
 4,817,807
Accumulated other comprehensive income508,152
 354,851
428,592
 465,631
Treasury stock, at cost, 99,161,296 and 97,597,899 shares, respectively(1,968,227) (1,880,790)
Treasury stock, at cost, 99,089,631and 99,100,186 shares, respectively(1,969,179) (1,969,411)
Total stockholders’ equity4,324,401
 3,953,356
4,378,541
 4,306,217
Noncontrolling interests9,446
 7,526
32,089
 29,249
Total equity4,333,847
 3,960,882
4,410,630
 4,335,466
Total liabilities and equity$19,932,912
 $18,403,873
$20,120,634
 $20,155,896

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


1

Table of Contents


W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended
September 30, September 30,March 31
2012 2011 2012 20112013 2012
REVENUES:          
Net premiums written$1,275,887
 $1,126,139
 $3,670,404
 $3,266,857
$1,376,966
 $1,203,526
Change in net unearned premiums(89,354) (70,316) (236,863) (211,293)(144,847) (103,875)
Net premiums earned1,186,533
 1,055,823
 3,433,541
 3,055,564
1,232,119
 1,099,651
Net investment income116,019
 114,063
 434,888
 409,261
135,929
 157,619
Insurance service fees26,208
 22,279
 77,121
 69,487
26,736
 23,877
Net investment gains:       
Net realized gains on investment sales17,226
 21,238
 84,989
 73,812
Net investment gains19,969
 43,477
Change in valuation allowance, net of other-than-temporary impairments5,000
 
 9,014
 (400)
 4,014
Net investment gains22,226
 21,238
 94,003
 73,412
Revenues from wholly-owned investees68,087
 65,922
 173,196
 175,943
91,735
 49,675
Other income1,428
 406
 2,204
 1,364
281
 392
Total revenues1,420,501
 1,279,731
 4,214,953
 3,785,031
1,506,769
 1,378,705
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
Losses and loss expenses736,632
 683,980
 2,147,306
 1,965,351
744,679
 679,472
Other operating costs and expenses451,487
 407,149
 1,332,024
 1,196,936
481,604
 431,779
Expenses from wholly-owned investees66,177
 64,388
 172,438
 174,059
89,152
 51,330
Interest expense32,512
 28,068
 93,750
 84,317
31,111
 28,821
Total operating costs and expenses1,286,808
 1,183,585
 3,745,518
 3,420,663
1,346,546
 1,191,402
Income before income taxes133,693
 96,146
 469,435
 364,368
160,223
 187,303
Income tax expense(32,685) (19,775) (124,291) (90,282)(43,625) (52,071)
Net income before noncontrolling interests101,008
 76,371
 345,144
 274,086
116,598
 135,232
Noncontrolling interests(61) 39
 (41) 98
17
 86
Net income to common stockholders$100,947
 $76,410
 $345,103
 $274,184
$116,615
 $135,318
   
NET INCOME PER SHARE:          
Basic$0.74
 $0.55
 $2.51
 $1.95
$0.86
 $0.98
Diluted0.71
 0.53
 2.41
 1.87
0.83
 0.94

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.





2

Table of Contents

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended
September 30, September 30,March 31
2012 2011 2012 20112013 2012
Net income before noncontrolling interests$101,008
 $76,371
 $345,144
 $274,086
$116,598
 $135,232
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Change in unrealized foreign exchange gains (losses)26,056
 (30,957) 24,382
 (21,104)
Unrealized holding gains on investment securities arising during the period, net of taxes79,772
 39,031
 188,263
 125,085
Reclassification adjustment for net investment gains included in net income, net of taxes(14,811) (13,784) (61,743) (46,910)
Change in unrecognized pension obligation, net of taxes823
 707
 2,470
 2,118
Change in unrealized translation adjustments(46,623) 15,583
Change in unrealized investment gains (losses), net of taxes7,810
 22,024
Change in net pension asset, net of taxes1,814
 824
Other comprehensive income (loss)91,840
 (5,003) 153,372
 59,189
(36,999) 38,431
Comprehensive income192,848
 71,368
 498,516
 333,275
79,599
 173,663
Comprehensive (income) loss to the noncontrolling interest(104) 40
 (112) 87
(23) 63
Comprehensive income to common stockholders$192,744
 $71,408
 $498,404
 $333,362
$79,576
 $173,726

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended
September 30,March 31
2012 20112013 2012
COMMON STOCK:      
Beginning and end of period$47,024
 $47,024
$47,024
 $47,024
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:      
Beginning of period$941,109
 $935,099
$945,166
 $941,109
Stock options exercised and restricted stock units issued, net of tax(24,683) (26,914)(233) (10,139)
Restricted stock units expensed20,035
 18,855
4,993
 7,447
Stock issued to directors454
 308
End of period$936,915
 $927,348
$949,926
 $938,417
RETAINED EARNINGS:      
Beginning of period$4,491,162
 $4,143,207
$4,817,807
 $4,491,162
Net income to common stockholders345,103
 274,184
116,615
 135,318
Dividends(35,728) (32,274)(12,244) (11,041)
End of period$4,800,537
 $4,385,117
$4,922,178
 $4,615,439
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:      
Unrealized investment gains (losses):   
Unrealized investment gains:   
Beginning of period$430,419
 $334,747
$517,658
 $430,419
Unrealized gains on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired123,579
 79,435
7,047
 20,868
Unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities2,870
 (1,271)
Unrealized gains on other-than-temporarily impaired securities723
 1,133
End of period556,868
 412,911
525,428
 452,420
Currency translation adjustments:      
Beginning of period(61,239) (42,488)(36,676) (61,239)
Net change in period24,382
 (21,104)(46,623) 15,583
End of period(36,857) (63,592)(83,299) (45,656)
Net pension asset:      
Beginning of period(14,329) (15,696)(15,351) (14,329)
Net change in period2,470
 2,118
1,814
 824
End of period(11,859) (13,578)(13,537) (13,505)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income$508,152
 $335,741
$428,592
 $393,259
TREASURY STOCK:      
Beginning of period$(1,880,790) $(1,750,494)$(1,969,411) $(1,880,790)
Stock exercised/vested40,137
 40,571
232
 20,099
Stock repurchased(128,155) (177,648)
 (6,532)
Stock issued to directors581
 564
End of period$(1,968,227) $(1,887,007)$(1,969,179) $(1,867,223)
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS:      
Beginning of period$7,526
 $6,980
$29,249
 $7,526
Contributions1,808
 522
2,817
 1,076
Net loss (income)41
 (98)
Net income(17) (86)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax71
 11
40
 23
End of period$9,446
 $7,415
$32,089
 $8,539
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended
September 30,March 31,
2012 20112013 2012
CASH FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:   
CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:   
Net income to common stockholders$345,103
 $274,184
$116,615
 $135,318
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:      
Net investment gains(94,003) (73,412)(19,969) (47,491)
Depreciation and amortization65,089
 57,332
20,910
 22,212
Noncontrolling interests41
 (98)(17) (86)
Investment funds(50,124) (11,236)(10,934) (27,624)
Stock incentive plans21,070
 19,727
4,989
 7,447
Change in:      
Arbitrage trading account(2,355) (2,840)4,485
 (2,946)
Premiums and fees receivable(192,803) (111,411)(76,268) (97,077)
Reinsurance accounts(90,587) (137,192)(34,039) (16,857)
Deferred policy acquisition costs(34,843) (41,635)(23,608) (11,483)
Deferred income taxes(195) 25,934
Income taxes22,471
 48,160
Reserves for losses and loss expenses215,993
 250,393
84,569
 47,443
Unearned premiums284,908
 264,681
174,229
 115,434
Other(13,945) (29,184)(148,321) (98,688)
Net cash from (used in) operating activities453,349
 485,243
Net cash from operating activities115,112
 73,762
CASH FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:      
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturity securities549,876
 1,129,377
463,388
 295,134
Proceeds from sale of equity securities233,239
 112,760
38,248
 32,575
Distributions from (contributions to) investment funds(6,293) (148,537)(22,072) 24,744
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of fixed maturity securities1,659,751
 1,190,751
667,711
 408,647
Purchase of fixed maturity securities(2,510,322) (2,118,556)(896,378) (872,588)
Purchase of equity securities(218,490) (49,932)(35,486) (68,652)
Real estate purchased(71,348) (347,602)(10,301) (5,611)
Change in loans receivable(106,721) 71,803
(53,405) (93,934)
Net additions to real estate, furniture and equipment(22,319) (37,405)(13,042) (15,055)
Change in balances due to security brokers79,344
 122,447
43,325
 16,146
Payment for business purchased, net of cash acquired
 (8,579)(38,556) 
Net cash from (used in) investing activities(413,283) (83,473)143,432
 (278,594)
CASH FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:      
Repayment of senior notes and other debt(206,280) (1,684)
Net proceeds from issuance of debt375,641
 309

 354,315
Net proceeds from stock options exercised8,667
 13,757

 3,428
Cash dividends to common stockholders(35,730) (32,272)
Purchase of common treasury shares(121,362) (177,648)
Other, net15,799
 16,816
7,638
 10,446
Net cash from (used in) financing activities243,015
 (179,038)(198,642) 366,505
Net impact on cash due to change in foreign exchange rates(5,259) 446
(20,080) 8,992
Net change in cash and cash equivalents277,822
 223,178
39,822
 170,665
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year911,742
 642,952
905,670
 911,742
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,189,564
 $866,130
$945,492
 $1,082,407
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

W. R. Berkley Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(1) General
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of W. R. Berkley Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. The unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, which are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations on a basis consistent with the prior audited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements requires the use of management estimates. For further information related to a description of areas of judgment and estimates and other information necessary to understand the Company’s financial position and results of operations, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112012. Reclassifications have been made in the 20112012 financial statements as originally reported to conform to the presentation of the 20122013 financial statements.
The income tax provision has been computed based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the quarter differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% principally because of tax-exempt investment income.

(2) Per Share Data
The Company presents both basic and diluted net income per share (“EPS”) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period and is calculated using the treasury stock method for stock incentive plans. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and, accordingly, are excluded from the calculation.
The weighted average number of common shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows (amounts in thousands):follows:
 For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended
(In thousands) For the Three Months Ended
 September 30, September 30, March 31,
 2012 2011 2012 2011 2013 2012
Basic 136,553
 138,816
 137,512
 140,535
 136,025
 137,814
Diluted 141,637
 144,538
 142,941
 146,553
 141,223
 143,411

(3) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2010,February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")(FASB) issued guidance regarding the treatmentASU 2013-02 relating to disclosures about items reclassified out of costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. This guidance modified the definition of the types of costs that can be capitalized and specifies that the costs must be directly related to the successful acquisition of a new or renewed insurance contract.accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2012 and retrospectively adjusted its previously issued financial statements. The impact of applying this guidance retrospectively was a reduction in stockholders' equity of $51 million as of December 31, 2010.


6

Table of Contents

A summary of the impact of the adoption of this new guidance is shown below (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
 Previously ReportedAs Adjusted
At December 31, 2011:  
Deferred policy acquisition costs$448,795
$364,937
Deferred tax liability31,623
2,835
Stockholders' equity4,008,426
3,953,356
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011: 
Other operating costs and expenses$1,193,040
$1,196,936
Income before income taxes368,264
364,368
Federal and foreign income taxes(91,485)(90,282)
Net income276,877
274,184
   
Basic net income per share$1.97
$1.95
Diluted net income per share1.89
1.87
   
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011: 
Other operating costs and expenses$405,850
$407,149
Income before income taxes97,445
96,146
Federal and foreign income taxes(20,176)(19,775)
Net income77,308
76,410
   
Basic net income per share$0.56
$0.55
Diluted net income per share0.53
0.53


In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance related to measuring and disclosing fair values. The Company'sCompany’s adoption of the updated guidance effective January 1, 20122013 resulted in a change in the presentation ofdisclosures for accumulated other comprehensive income in the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements but did not have any impact on the Company'sCompany’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance relating to the presentation of the components of net income and other comprehensive income. The Company's adoption of the updated guidance effective January 1, 2012 resulted in a change in the presentation of the Company's consolidated financial statements but did not have any impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

All recently issued but not yet effective accounting and reporting guidance isstandards are either not applicable to the Company or isare not expected to have a material impact on the Company.

(4) Acquisitions

In 2012, the Company acquired a 49% interest in a worldwide supplier of after-market original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts, systems and custom logistic support services for military aircraft operations for $43 million. In January 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 51% of this business for $43 million. The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets acquired range from 2 years to 15 years, with approximately $3 million having an indefinite life.

6

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
(In thousands)Acquired in 2013
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3,911
Real estate, furniture and equipment898
Goodwill19,664
Intangible assets44,800
Other assets60,661
Total assets acquired129,934
Debt(27,612)
Other liabilities assumed(17,076)
  Net assets acquired$85,246

(4)(5) Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the components of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
 Unrealized Investment gains Currency translation adjustments Net pension asset Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(In thousands)       
Changes in AOCI      
Beginning of period$517,658
 $(36,676) $(15,351) $465,631
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications20,989
 (46,623) 
 (25,634)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(13,179) 
 1,814
 (11,365)
Other comprehensive income (loss)7,810
 (46,623) 1,814
 (36,999)
Unrealized investment gain related to non-controlling interest(40) 
 
 (40)
Ending balance$525,428
 $(83,299) $(13,537) $428,592
Amounts reclassified from AOCI       
Pre-tax$(20,075)(1)$
 $2,792
(3)$(17,283)
Tax effect6,896
(2)
 (978)(2)5,918
After-tax amounts reclassified$(13,179) $
 $1,814
 $(11,365)
Other comprehensive income (loss)       
Pre-tax$12,015
 $(46,623) $2,792
 $(31,816)
Tax effect(4,205) 
 (978) (5,183)
Other comprehensive income (loss)$7,810
 $(46,623) $1,814
 $(36,999)
_______________
(1) Net investment gains in the consolidated statements of operations.
(2) Income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
(3) Other operating costs and expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

(6) Statements of Cash Flow
Interest payments were $109,045,00053,691,000 and $100,840,00045,358,000 and income taxes paid were $114,343,00023,850,000 and $42,797,0003,249,000 in the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 20112012, respectively.




7

Table of Contents

(5)
(7) Investments in Fixed Maturity Securities
At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, investments in fixed maturity securities were as follows:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
Gains Losses 
September 30, 2012         
(In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
Gains Losses 
March 31, 2013         
Held to maturity:                  
State and municipal$64,301
 $17,979
 $
 $82,280
 $64,301
$66,125
 $17,675
 $
 $83,800
 $66,125
Residential mortgage-backed34,065
 5,661
 
 39,726
 34,065
31,181
 4,977
 
 36,158
 31,181
Corporate4,997
 670
 
 5,667
 4,997
4,997
 555
 
 5,552
 4,997
Total held to maturity103,363
 24,310
 
 127,673
 103,363
102,303
 23,207
 
 125,510
 102,303
Available for sale:                  
U.S. government and government agency858,190
 80,406
 (1,283) 937,313
 937,313
807,341
 68,429
 (58) 875,712
 875,712
State and municipal4,509,239
 348,413
 (14,862) 4,842,790
 4,842,790
4,110,714
 308,121
 (9,219) 4,409,616
 4,409,616
Mortgage-backed securities:                  
Residential (1)1,458,059
 61,231
 (7,976) 1,511,314
 1,511,314
1,293,875
 48,550
 (6,878) 1,335,547
 1,335,547
Commercial152,816
 5,430
 (238) 158,008
 158,008
203,260
 6,504
 (398) 209,366
 209,366
Corporate3,052,275
 212,664
 (15,787) 3,249,152
 3,249,152
3,370,627
 210,832
 (10,380) 3,571,079
 3,571,079
Foreign1,008,266
 82,826
 (620) 1,090,472
 1,090,472
1,065,472
 96,381
 (359) 1,161,494
 1,161,494
Total available for sale11,038,845
 790,970
 (40,766) 11,789,049
 11,789,049
10,851,289
 738,817
 (27,292) 11,562,814
 11,562,814
Total investments in fixed maturity securities$11,142,208
 $815,280
 $(40,766) $11,916,722
 $11,892,412
$10,953,592
 $762,024
 $(27,292) $11,688,324
 $11,665,117
December 31, 2011         
December 31, 2012         
Held to maturity:                  
State and municipal$74,354
 $12,546
 $
 $86,900
 $74,354
$65,190
 $18,529
 $
 $83,719
 $65,190
Residential mortgage-backed35,759
 5,610
 
 41,369
 35,759
32,764
 5,286
 
 38,050
 32,764
Corporate4,996
 717
 
 5,713
 4,996
4,997
 605
 
 5,602
 4,997
Total held to maturity115,109
 18,873
 
 133,982
 115,109
102,951
 24,420
 
 127,371
 102,951
Available for sale:                  
U.S. government and government agency906,924
 69,920
 (351) 976,493
 976,493
827,591
 72,532
 (1,660) 898,463
 898,463
State and municipal5,031,275
 308,345
 (16,550) 5,323,070
 5,323,070
4,449,238
 328,974
 (9,693) 4,768,519
 4,768,519
Mortgage-backed securities:                  
Residential (1)1,416,427
 75,635
 (15,894) 1,476,168
 1,476,168
1,395,739
 53,846
 (7,456) 1,442,129
 1,442,129
Commercial105,383
 4,054
 (1,018) 108,419
 108,419
268,671
 5,641
 (744) 273,568
 273,568
Corporate2,328,200
 132,311
 (36,087) 2,424,424
 2,424,424
3,144,480
 214,322
 (12,083) 3,346,719
 3,346,719
Foreign850,838
 42,165
 (4,649) 888,354
 888,354
1,029,284
 83,347
 (1,024) 1,111,607
 1,111,607
Total available for sale10,639,047
 632,430
 (74,549) 11,196,928
 11,196,928
11,115,003
 758,662
 (32,660) 11,841,005
 11,841,005
Total investments in fixed maturity securities$10,754,156
 $651,303
 $(74,549) $11,330,910
 $11,312,037
$11,217,954
 $783,082
 $(32,660) $11,968,376
 $11,943,956
___________
(1)
Gross unrealized losses for residential mortgage-backed securities include $3,251,0001,925,000 and $7,668,0003,037,000 as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively, related to the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) recognized in other comprehensive income.


8

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
(In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Due in one year or less$877,420
 $896,040
$798,683
 $826,292
Due after one year through five years3,223,807
 3,416,358
3,482,465
 3,673,747
Due after five years through ten years2,422,530
 2,688,914
2,536,987
 2,806,448
Due after ten years2,973,511
 3,206,362
2,607,141
 2,800,766
Mortgage-backed securities1,644,940
 1,709,048
1,528,316
 1,581,071
Total$11,142,208
 $11,916,722
$10,953,592
 $11,688,324
At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, there were no investments, other than investments in United States government and government agency securities, which exceeded 10% of common stockholders’ equity.

(6)(8) Investments in Equity Securities Available for Sale
At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, investments in equity securities available for sale were as follows:
 
(Dollars in thousands)Cost Gross Unrealized 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
Gains Losses 
September 30, 2012         
(In thousands)Cost Gross Unrealized 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
Gains Losses 
March 31, 2013         
Common stocks$228,524
 $96,648
 $(291) $324,881
 $324,881
$224,378
 $71,995
 $(1,342) $295,031
 $295,031
Preferred stocks95,566
 8,024
 (3,149) 100,441
 100,441
82,600
 23,340
 (1,585) 104,355
 104,355
Total$324,090
 $104,672
 $(3,440) $425,322
 $425,322
$306,978
 $95,335
 $(2,927) $399,386
 $399,386
December 31, 2011         
December 31, 2012         
Common stocks$209,210
 $113,660
 $(2,888) $319,982
 $319,982
$222,671
 $60,102
 $(707) $282,066
 $282,066
Preferred stocks133,183
 5,139
 (14,865) 123,457
 123,457
85,504
 10,103
 (1,651) 93,956
 93,956
Total$342,393
 $118,799
 $(17,753) $443,439
 $443,439
$308,175
 $70,205
 $(2,358) $376,022
 $376,022
(7)
(9) Arbitrage Trading Account
At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, the fair value and carrying value of the arbitrage trading account were $417701 million and $397329 million, respectively. The primary focus of the trading account is merger arbitrage. Merger arbitrage is the business of investing in the securities of publicly held companies which are the targets in announced tender offers and mergers. Arbitrage investing differs from other types of investing in its focus on transactions and events believed likely to bring about a change in value over a relatively short time period (usually four months or less). The Company believes that this makes arbitrage investments less vulnerable to changes in general financial market conditions.


9

Table of Contents



(8)(10) Net Investment Income
Net investment income consists of the following:
 
For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended
September 30, September 30,March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
Investment income (losses) earned on:       
(In thousands)2013 2012
Investment income earned on:   
Fixed maturity securities, including cash and cash equivalents and loans receivable$121,454
 $120,252
 $360,577
 $365,365
$117,836
 $119,288
Investment funds(13,118) (10,820) 50,124
 21,069
10,934
 27,623
Arbitrage trading account2,397
 (346) 8,938
 10,696
3,783
 6,481
Equity securities available for sale4,001
 2,795
 10,980
 9,544
2,247
 3,150
Real estate3,097
 2,848
 8,621
 5,192
3,141
 2,176
Gross investment income117,831
 114,729
 439,240
 411,866
137,941
 158,718
       
Investment expense(1,812) (666) (4,352) (2,605)(2,012) (1,099)
Net investment income$116,019
 $114,063
 $434,888
 $409,261
$135,929
 $157,619

(9)(11) Investment Funds
Investment funds consist of the following:
Carrying Value
as of
 
Income (Losses)
from Investment Funds
Carrying Value
as of
 
Income (Losses)
from Investment Funds
September 30, December 31, For the Nine Months Ended September 30,March 31 December 31, For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
(In thousands)2013 2012 2013 2012
Real estate$381,986
 $373,413
 $13,513
 $14,977
$379,006
 $373,259
 $(2,001) $8,655
Energy129,376
 98,974
 28,966
 10,947
147,383
 146,325
 9,466
 17,938
Arbitrage61,049
 58,008
 3,041
 (2,767)63,462
 63,920
 (458) 1,770
Other175,227
 150,243
 4,604
 (2,088)203,752
 226,185
 3,927
 (740)
Total$747,638
 $680,638
 $50,124

$21,069
$793,603
 $809,689
 $10,934

$27,623

The Company's share of the earnings or losses of investment funds is generally reported on a one-quarter lag in order to facilitate the timely completion of the Company's consolidated financial statements.

(10)(12) Real Estate

RealInvestment in real estate isrepresents directly owned property held for investment. At investment, as follows:    
 Carrying value as of
 March 31, December 31,
(In thousands)2013 2012
Properties in operation$264,755
 $282,899
Properties under development324,022
 323,836
Total$588,777
 $606,735

September 30, 2012, real estate consists of three office buildings in London, including twoProperties in operation and one under development,represent an office building in London and a long-term ground lease in Washington D.C. These properties are net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $11,397,000 and $10,354,000, as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Related depreciation expense was $1,757,000 and $2,105,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Future minimum rental income expected on operating leases relating to real estate held for investment is $362,0001,099,000 in 2012, $1,460,0002013 in 2013,, $1,504,000 in 2014, $1,549,000 in 2015, $1,596,000 in 2016, $1,644,000 in 2017 and $330,657,000329,013,000 thereafter.


Properties under development represent an office building in London, a mixed-use project in Washington D.C. and an office complex in New York City. The Company expects to fund further development costs for these projects with a combination of its own funds and external financing.

10

Table of Contents

(11)(13) Loans Receivable
Loans receivable are as follows:
      
(Dollars in thousands)September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
Total loans receivable$371,408
 $263,187
(In thousands)March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Loans receivable$456,533
 $401,961
      
Valuation allowance:      
Specific$3,080
 $19,041
$3,500
 $3,000
General2,674
 764
2,682
 2,620
Total$5,754
 $19,805
$6,182
 $5,620
      
Impaired loans:      
With a specific valuation allowance$2,362
 $29,702
$3,003
 $1,775
Without a valuation allowance30,299
 30,357
30,000
 31,023
Unpaid principal balance35,660
 93,922
36,003
 35,872
      
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,2012 2011
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2013 2012
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance$(14,053) $541
$62
 $(6,896)
Loans receivable charged off139
 9
463
 85
   
For the Three Months Ended September 30,   
Decrease in valuation allowance(7,280) (9)
Loans receivable charged off54
 9

Loans receivable in non-accrual status were $31 million and $303 million at both September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively.. If these loans had been current, additional interest income of $0.60.7 million and none$0.2 million would have been recognized in accordance with their original terms for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 20112012, respectively.
The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable and assesses the ability of the borrower to pay principal and interest based upon loan structure, underlying property values, cash flow and related financial and operating performance of the property and market conditions. Loans receivable with a potential for default are further assessed using discounted cash flow analysis and comparable cost and sales methodologies, if appropriate.
The Company's fivesix largest loans receivable, which have an aggregate amortized cost of $217243 million and an aggregate fair value of $212250 million at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, are secured by commercial real estate located primarily in New York City, California, Hawaii and Boston.Chicago. These loans earn interest at floating LIBOR-based interest rates and have maturities (inclusive of extension options) through August 2025. As part of the evaluation process, the Company reviews certain credit quality indicators for these loans.
The Company utilizes an internal risk rating system to assign a risk to each of its commercial loans. The loan rating system takes into consideration credit quality indicators including loan to value ratios, which compare the outstanding loan amount to the estimated value of the property, the borrower's financial condition and performance with respect to loan terms, the Company's position in the capital structure, and the overall leverage in the capital structure. Based on this rating system, one loan with an aggregate cost basis of $30 million was considered to be impaired at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013. For each of this loan, aA determination was made as to the amount of loss in the event of a default and whether the loss is probable. The results of the determination were considered in connection with the valuation allowance noted above. An additional credit quality indicator is the debt service coverage ratio, which compares a property's net operating income to the borrower's principal and interest payments. At September 30, 2012, each of the five largest loans referred to above had a debt service coverage ratio greater than 3.0, except one that is lower due to a recent and temporary rate abatement.


11

Table of Contents



(12)(14) Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains

Realized and unrealized investment gains and losses are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months EndedFor the Three Months Ended March 31,
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
Realized investment gains:       
(In thousands)2013 2012
Realized investment gains and losses: 
  
Fixed maturity securities:        
  
Gains$4,439
 $10,212
 $25,046
 $25,049
$10,996
 $14,955
Losses(1,937) (2,207) (4,243) (4,716)(5,966) (543)
Equity securities available for sale14,447
 12,318
 58,873
 50,539
15,245
 26,238
Investment funds194
 1,310
Other
 
 1,535
 
(500) 1,517
Sales of investment funds277
 915
 3,778
 2,940
Change in valuation allowance, net of other-than -temporary impairments (1)5,000
 
 9,014
 (400)
Total net investment gains before income taxes22,226
 21,238
 94,003
 73,412
Total19,969
 43,477
   
Change in valuation allowance, net other-than-temporary impairments:   
Decrease in valuation allowance
 6,998
Other-than-temporary impairments
 (2,984)
Total
 4,014
   
Net investment gains19,969
 47,491
Income tax expense(7,415) (7,454) (32,260) (26,502)(6,989) (16,409)
Total net investment gains$14,811
 $13,784
 $61,743
 $46,910
Total after-tax investment gains and losses$12,980
 $31,082
Change in unrealized gains of available for sale securities:       
Fixed maturity securities$96,077
 $115,933
 $186,637
 $187,851
Less non-credit portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income2,483
 (1,300) 4,416
 (1,956)
Equity securities available for sale(2,891) (65,861) 186
 (59,760)
Investment funds4,255
 (9,257) 3,281
 (5,067)
Total change in unrealized gains before income taxes and noncontrolling interests99,924
 39,515
 194,520
 121,068
Income tax expense(34,963) (14,268) (68,000) (42,893)
Noncontrolling interests(43) 1
 (71) (11)
Total change in net unrealized gains$64,918
 $25,248
 $126,449
 $78,164
Change in unrealized investment gains and losses: 
  
Fixed maturity securities$(15,589) $19,422
Previously impaired fixed maturity securities1,112
 1,743
Equity securities available for sale24,561
 11,595
Investment funds(3,268) 1,677
Total change in unrealized investment gains and losses6,816
 34,437
Income tax benefit (expense)994
 (12,413)
Noncontrolling interests(40) (23)
    Total after-tax unrealized gains and losses$7,770
 $22,001
_________
(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, this represents a change in valuation allowance of $14 million, partially offset by an other-than-temporary impairment of $5 million.

12

Table of Contents



(13)(15) Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position
The following table summarizes all securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012 by the length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position: 
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater TotalLess Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(Dollars in thousands)Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
September 30, 2012           
(In thousands)Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
March 31, 2013           
U.S. government and agency$51,405
 $1,283
 $
 $
 $51,405
 $1,283
$24,203
 $58
 $
 $
 $24,203
 $58
State and municipal49,594
 558
 184,408
 14,304
 234,002
 14,862
133,592
 1,830
 100,664
 7,389
 234,256
 9,219
Mortgage-backed securities259,508
 3,338
 65,349
 4,876
 324,857
 8,214
451,452
 4,235
 44,419
 3,041
 495,871
 7,276
Corporate313,080
 1,784
 78,646
 14,003
 391,726
 15,787
348,050
 2,425
 66,309
 7,955
 414,359
 10,380
Foreign101,200
 516
 5,508
 104
 106,708
 620
91,803
 309
 3,221
 50
 95,024
 359
Fixed maturity securities774,787
 7,479
 333,911
 33,287
 1,108,698
 40,766
1,049,100
 8,857
 214,613
 18,435
 1,263,713
 27,292
Common stocks34,702
 291
 
 
 34,702
 291
31,119
 1,342
 
 
 31,119
 1,342
Preferred stocks6,435
 954
 40,094
 2,195
 46,529
 3,149
386
 235
 24,324
 1,350
 24,710
 1,585
Equity securities41,137
 1,245
 40,094
 2,195
 81,231
 3,440
31,505
 1,577
 24,324
 1,350
 55,829
 2,927
Total$815,924
 $8,724
 $374,005
 $35,482
 $1,189,929
 $44,206
$1,080,605
 $10,434
 $238,937
 $19,785
 $1,319,542
 $30,219
                      
December 31, 2011           
December 31, 2012           
U.S. government and agency$24,668
 $169
 $4,800
 $182
 $29,468
 $351
$69,551
 $1,660
 $
 $
 $69,551
 $1,660
State and municipal131,417
 827
 183,205
 15,723
 314,622
 16,550
152,694
 1,639
 135,967
 8,054
 288,661
 9,693
Mortgage-backed securities172,729
 2,439
 94,243
 14,473
 266,972
 16,912
484,731
 3,629
 58,292
 4,571
 543,023
 8,200
Corporate341,764
 8,327
 125,654
 27,760
 467,418
 36,087
371,781
 2,964
 70,537
 9,119
 442,318
 12,083
Foreign197,560
 4,078
 7,159
 571
 204,719
 4,649
95,623
 996
 11,210
 28
 106,833
 1,024
Fixed maturity securities868,138
 15,840
 415,061
 58,709
 1,283,199
 74,549
1,174,380
 10,888
 276,006
 21,772
 1,450,386
 32,660
Common stocks47,098
 2,888
 
 
 47,098
 2,888
46,725
 707
 
 
 46,725
 707
Preferred stocks23,782
 125
 45,314
 14,740
 69,096
 14,865

 
 39,812
 1,651
 39,812
 1,651
Equity securities70,880
 3,013
 45,314
 14,740
 116,194
 17,753
46,725
 707
 39,812
 1,651
 86,537
 2,358
Total$939,018
 $18,853
 $460,375
 $73,449
 $1,399,393
 $92,302
$1,221,105
 $11,595
 $315,818
 $23,423
 $1,536,923
 $35,018
Fixed Maturity Securities – A summary of the Company’s non-investment grade fixed maturity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 is presented in the table below.  
(Dollars in thousands)
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
($ in thousands)
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
Unrealized loss greater than $5 million:
 $

$
Unrealized loss less than $5 million:          
Mortgage-backed securities13
 $71,135
 $4,908
12
 54,367
 2,925
Corporate11
 28,841
 2,003
9
 28,242
 3,172
State and municipal4
 32,625
 2,197
2
 24,654
 1,264
Foreign1
 11,513
 7
Total28
 $132,601
 $9,108
24
 $118,776
 $7,368

For OTTI of fixed maturity securities that management does not intend to sell or, more likely than not, would not be required to sell, the portion of the decline in value considered to be due to credit factors is recognized in earnings and the portion of the decline in value considered to be due to non-credit factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. For the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, there were no changes in the portion of impairments recognized in earnings for those securities that have been impaired due to both credit factors and non-credit factors.
 
The Company has evaluated its fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position and believes the unrealized losses are due primarily to temporary market and sector-related factors rather than to issuer-specific factors. None of these securities are

13

Table of Contents

delinquent or in default under financial covenants. Based on its assessment of these issuers, the Company expects them to

13

Table of Contents

continue to meet their contractual payment obligations as they become due and does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.
Preferred Stocks – At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, there were fivetwo preferred stocks in an unrealized loss position, with an aggregate fair value of $47 million and a gross unrealized loss of $3 million. Four of those preferred stocks with an aggregate fair value of $2125 million and a gross unrealized loss of $2 million were. One of those preferred stocks with a gross unrealized loss of $0.2 million was rated non-investment grade. Based upon management’s view of the underlying value of these securities, the Company does not consider either of these preferred stocks to be OTTI.
Common Stocks – At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the Company owned threetwo common stocks in an unrealized loss position with an aggregate fair value of $3531 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $0.31 million. The Company does not consider these common stocks to be OTTI.

(14)(16) Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale and its arbitrage trading account securities are carried at fair value. Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
Because many fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis, the Company utilizes pricing models and processes which may include benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. Market inputs used to evaluate securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. Quoted prices are often unavailable for recently issued securities, securities that are infrequently traded or securities that are only traded in private transactions. For publicly traded securities for which quoted prices are unavailable, the Company determines fair value based on independent broker quotations and other observable market data. For securities traded only in private negotiations, the Company determines fair value based primarily on the cost of such securities, which is adjusted to reflect prices of recent placements of securities of the same issuer, financial projections, credit quality and business developments of the issuer and other relevant information.



14

Table of Contents

The following tables present the assets and liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring basis, as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012 by Level:
 
(Dollars in thousands)Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
September 30, 2012       
(In thousands)Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
March 31, 2013       
Assets:              
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:              
U.S. government and agency$937,313
 $
 $937,313
 $
$875,712
 $
 $875,712
 $
State and municipal4,842,790
 
 4,842,790
 
4,409,616
 
 4,409,616
 
Mortgage-backed securities1,669,322
 
 1,669,322
 
1,544,913
 
 1,544,913
 
Corporate3,249,152
 
 3,183,648
 65,504
3,571,079
 
 3,515,310
 55,769
Foreign1,090,472
 
 1,090,472
 
1,161,494
 
 1,161,494
 
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale11,789,049
 
 11,723,545
 65,504
11,562,814
 
 11,507,045
 55,769
Equity securities available for sale:       
Equity securities:       
Common stocks324,881
 323,472
 
 1,409
295,031
 293,793
 
 1,238
Preferred stocks100,441
 
 97,449
 2,992
104,355
 
 103,969
 386
Total equity securities available for sale425,322
 323,472
 97,449
 4,401
Total equity securities399,386
 293,793
 103,969
 1,624
Arbitrage trading account417,446
 294,713
 121,948
 785
701,223
 236,670
 463,456
 1,097
Total$12,631,817
 $618,185
 $11,942,942
 $70,690
$12,663,423
 $530,463
 $12,074,470
 $58,490
Liabilities:              
Securities sold but not yet purchased$149,405
 $148,301
 $1,084
 $20
$79,965
 $70,580
 $9,383
 $2
December 31, 2011       
December 31, 2012       
Assets:              
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:              
U.S. government and agency$976,493
 $
 $976,493
 $
$898,463
 $
 $898,463
 $
State and municipal5,323,070
 
 5,323,070
 
4,768,519
 
 4,768,519
 
Mortgage-backed securities1,584,587
 
 1,584,587
 
1,715,697
 
 1,715,697
 
Corporate2,424,424
 
 2,356,596
 67,828
3,346,719
 
 3,287,654
 59,065
Foreign888,354
 
 888,354
 
1,111,607
 
 1,111,607
 
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale11,196,928
 
 11,129,100
 67,828
11,841,005
 
 11,781,940
 59,065
Equity securities available for sale:       
Equity securities:       
Common stocks319,982
 318,423
 
 1,559
282,066
 280,658
 
 1,408
Preferred stocks123,457
 
 111,154
 12,303
93,956
 
 93,335
 621
Total equity securities available for sale443,439
 318,423
 111,154
 13,862
Total equity securities376,022
 280,658
 93,335
 2,029
Arbitrage trading account397,312
 208,516
 187,945
 851
329,077
 233,603
 94,546
 928
Total$12,037,679
 $526,939
 $11,428,199
 $82,541
$12,546,104
 $514,261
 $11,969,821
 $62,022
Liabilities:              
Securities sold but not yet purchased$62,514
 $62,493
 $
 $21
$121,487
 $114,909
 $6,558
 $20
There were no significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 or during the year ended December 31, 20112012.








15

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and for the year ended December 31, 20112012:
 
  Gains (Losses) Included in    Gains (Losses) Included in  
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning
Balance
 Earnings 
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Purchases (Sales) Maturities Transfer in 
Ending
Balance
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:               
(In thousands)
Beginning
Balance
 Earnings 
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Purchases (Sales) Maturities Transfer in 
Ending
Balance
Three months ended March 31, 2013:               
Assets:                              
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:               
Fixed maturities available for sale:               
Corporate$67,828
 $189
 $5,367
 $223
 $
 $(8,103) $
 $65,504
$59,065
 $(15) $144
 $14,297
 $(14,255) $(3,467) $
 $55,769
Total67,828
 189
 5,367
 223
 
 (8,103) 
 65,504
59,065
 (15) 144
 14,297
 (14,255) (3,467) 
 55,769
Equity securities available for sale:                              
Common stocks1,559
 
 
 
 (150) 
 
 1,409
1,408
 
 
 
 (170) 
 
 1,238
Preferred stocks12,303
 2,095
 (1,940) 
 (9,466) 
 
 2,992
621
 
 (235) 
 
 
 
 386
Total13,862
 2,095
 (1,940) 
 (9,616) 
 
 4,401
2,029
 
 (235) 
 (170) 
 
 1,624
Arbitrage trading account851
 (46) 



(35) 
 15
 785
928
 169
 




 
 
 1,097
Total$82,541
 $2,238
 $3,427
 $223
 $(9,651) $(8,103) $15
 $70,690
$62,022
 $154
 $(91) $14,297
 $(14,425) $(3,467) $
 $58,490
Liabilities:                              
Securities sold but not yet purchased$21
 $(1) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $20
$20
 $(18) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2
                              
For the year ended December 31, 2011:               
For the year ended December 31, 2012:               
Assets:                              
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:               
Fixed maturities available for sale:               
Corporate$88,063
 $(454) $(870) $15,271
 $(11,864) $(22,318) $
 $67,828
$67,828
 $(1,497) $9,622
 $283
 $
 $(17,171) $
 $59,065
Total88,063
 (454) (870) 15,271
 (11,864) (22,318) 
 67,828
67,828
 (1,497) 9,622
 283
 
 (17,171) 
 59,065
Equity securities available for sale:                              
Common stocks1,559
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,559
1,559
 
 
 
 (151) 
 
 1,408
Preferred stocks89,446
 28,947
 (30,865) 
 (75,225) 
 
 12,303
12,303
 1,126
 (1,737) 
 (11,071) 
 
 621
Total91,005
 28,947
 (30,865) 
 (75,225) 
 
 13,862
13,862
 1,126
 (1,737) 
 (11,222) 
 
 2,029
Arbitrage trading account3,187
 572
 
 269
 (3,266) 
 89
 851
851
 (3,534) 3,570
 
 (52) 
 93
 928
Total$182,255
 $29,065
 $(31,735) $15,540
 $(90,355) $(22,318) $89
 $82,541
$82,541
 $(3,905) $11,455
 $283
 $(11,274) $(17,171) $93
 $62,022
               
Liabilities:                              
Securities sold but not yet purchased$
 $40
 $
 $67
 $(86) $
 $
 $21
$21
 $(1) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $20
There were no significant transfers in or out of Level 3 during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 or during the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.


16

Table of Contents

(15)(17) Reinsurance
The following is a summary of reinsurance financial information:
 For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended For the Three Months Ended
 September 30, September 30, March 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2012 2011 2012 2011
(In thousands) 2013 2012
Written premiums:            
Direct $1,267,882
 $1,114,494
 $3,718,477
 $3,286,220
 $1,400,412
 $1,201,019
Assumed 226,842
 191,806
 608,693
 535,214
 231,209
 200,507
Ceded (218,837) (180,161) (656,766) (554,577) (254,655) (198,000)
Total net premiums written $1,275,887
 $1,126,139
 $3,670,404
 $3,266,857
 $1,376,966
 $1,203,526
            
Earned premiums:            
Direct $1,208,257
 $1,070,279
 $3,475,375
 $3,063,410
 $1,240,562
 $1,103,956
Assumed 193,024
 165,208
 559,304
 489,020
 214,016
 179,518
Ceded (214,748) (179,664) (601,138) (496,866) (222,459) (183,823)
Total net premiums earned $1,186,533
 $1,055,823
 $3,433,541
 $3,055,564
 $1,232,119
 $1,099,651
            
Ceded losses incurred $114,273
 $134,027
 $308,692
 $329,139
 $110,551
 $85,277
The Company reinsures a portion of its exposures principally to reduce its net liability on individual risks and to protect against catastrophic losses. The Company also cedes premiums to state assigned risk plans and captive insurance companies. Estimated amounts due from reinsurers are reported net of reserves for uncollectible reinsurance of $2 million as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012.

(16)(18) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments:
 
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
(In thousands)Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Assets:              
Fixed maturity securities$11,892,412
 $11,916,722
 $11,312,037
 $11,330,910
$11,665,117
 $11,688,324
 $11,943,956
 $11,968,376
Equity securities available for sale425,322
 425,322
 443,439
 443,439
399,386
 399,386
 376,022
 376,022
Arbitrage trading account417,446
 417,446
 397,312
 397,312
701,223
 701,223
 329,077
 329,077
Loans receivable371,408
 363,875
 263,187
 245,169
456,533
 462,779
 401,961
 406,443
Cash and cash equivalents1,189,564
 1,189,564
 911,742
 911,742
945,492
 945,492
 905,670
 905,670
Trading account receivables from brokers and clearing organizations387,352
 387,352
 318,240
 318,240
28,720
 28,720
 446,873
 446,873
Due from broker
 
 10,875
 10,875

 
 14,449
 14,449
Liabilities:              
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased149,405
 149,405
 62,514
 62,514
79,965
 79,965
 121,487
 121,487
Due to broker82,746
 82,746
 
 
31,300
 31,300
 
 
Junior subordinated debentures243,154
 254,800
 242,997
 258,400
243,258
 254,800
 243,206
 252,000
Senior notes and other debt1,877,431
 2,110,492
 1,500,503
 1,587,473
1,693,279
 1,961,361
 1,871,535
 2,190,173
The estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed maturity securities, equity securities available for sale and arbitrage trading account securities are based on various valuation techniques that rely on fair value measurements as described in note 14Note 16 above. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The fair value of loans receivable are estimated by using current institutional purchaser yield requirements for loans with similar credit characteristics, which is considered a Level 2 input. The fair value of the senior notes and other debt and the junior subordinated debentures is based on spreads for similar securities, which is considered a Level 2 input.


17

Table of Contents


(17)(19) Restricted Stock Units
Pursuant to its stock incentive plan, the Company may issue restricted stock units (RSUs) to officersemployees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The RSUs generally vest five years from the award date and are subject to other vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in the award agreement. RSUs are expensed pro-ratably over the vesting period. RSU expenses were $205 million and $197 million for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively. Grants of RSUs are made periodically, generally every other year. A summary of RSUs issued in the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 follows:
 
(dollars in thousands)Units Fair Value
Nine months ended September 30:   
20122,114,720
 $78,351
201153,250
 $1,674

($ in thousands)Units Fair Value
Three months ended March 31:   
201336,450
 $1,515
201235,000
 $1,218
(18) Industry(20) Business Segments
The Company’s operationsfinancial results are presently conducted in five segments ofpresented for the insurance business: Specialty, Regional, Alternative Markets, Reinsurance and International.following reportable business segments:
    
Our Specialty lines companies underwrite risks within theInsurance-Domestic - commercial insurance business, including excess and surplus lines market and on an admitted basis. The risks are highly complex, often unique exposures that typically fall outsidelines, throughout the underwriting guidelines of the standard insurance market or are best served by specialized knowledge of a particular industry. The Specialty lines of business include premises operations, commercial automobile, property, products liability and professional liability lines. The customers in this segment are highly diverse. Operating units deliver their products through a variety of distribution channels, depending on the customer base and particular risks insured.United States;
Our Regional companies provide insurance products and services that meet the specific needs of each regionally differentiated customer base by developing expertise in the niches that drive local communities. They provide commercial insurance products to customers primarily in 45 states and the District of Columbia. Key clients of this segment are small-to-mid-sized businesses and state and local governmental entities. The Regional business is sold through a network of non-exclusive independent agents who are compensated on a commission basis. Our Regional operating units are organized geographically in order to provide them with the flexibility to adapt quickly to local market conditions and customer needs.

Our Alternative Markets operating units offer
Insurance-International - insurance products, analytical tools and risk management services such as loss control and claims management that enable clients to select their risk tolerance and manage it appropriately. These units specializebusiness primarily in insuring, reinsuring and administering self-insurance programs and other alternative risk transfer mechanisms for clients such as commercial and governmental entity employers, employer groups, insurers, and other groups or entities seeking alternative ways to manage their exposure to risks. In addition to providing insurance products, the Alternative Markets segment also provides a wide variety of fee-based services, including claims, administrative and consulting services.

Our Reinsurance companies provide other insurance companies and self-insureds with assistance in managing their net risk through reinsurance on either a portfolio basis, through treaty reinsurance, or on an individual basis, through facultative reinsurance.
Our International operating units write business in almost 40 countries worldwide, with branches or offices in 15 locations outside the United States, including the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, South America, Australia, the Asia Pacific region,Canada, Scandinavia, and Canada. In eachAustralia; and

Reinsurance-Global - reinsurance business on a facultative and treaty basis, primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, and the Asia-Pacific Region.
During the first quarter of our2013, the Company changed the aggregation of its business segments. All domestic insurance operating companies, previously included in the Specialty, Regional and Alternative Markets segments, were aggregated into the Insurance-Domestic segment; all reinsurance operating companies were aggregated into the Reinsurance-Global segment; and all international operating territories, weinsurance companies were aggregated into the Insurance-International segment. The segment disclosures for prior periods have built decentralized structures that allow products and servicesbeen revised to be tailored to each regional customer base. Our International businesses are managed by teamsconsistent with the new reportable business segment presentation. The segment disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, and as of professionals with expertise in local marketsDecember 31, 2012 and knowledge of regional environments.2011, have also been included herein, revised for the new reportable business segment presentation.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Income tax expense and benefits are calculated based upon the Company’s overall effective tax rate.
Summary financial information about the Company’s operating segments is presented in the following table. Income before income taxes by segment consists of revenues, less expenses, related to the respective segment’s operations, including allocated investment income. Identifiable assets by segment are those assets used in or allocated to the operation of each segment.

18


Summary financial information about the Company's business segments is presented in the following tables.
  
Revenues    
(Dollars in thousands)
Earned
Premiums
 
Investment
Income 
 Other Total 
Pre-Tax
Income
(Loss)
 
Net
Income
(Loss)
For the three months ended September 30, 2012           
      Specialty$420,165
 $36,245
 $577
 $456,987
 $59,846
 $42,731
      Regional276,629
 16,174
 1,695
 294,498
 33,219
 23,296
      Alternative Markets177,041
 30,146
 23,936
 231,123
 39,433
 28,824
      Reinsurance111,599
 19,112
 
 130,711
 21,118
 15,732
      International201,099
 12,448
 
 213,547
 15,736
 7,141
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 1,894
 69,515
 71,409
 (57,885) (31,588)
     Net investment gains
 
 22,226
 22,226
 22,226
 14,811
     Consolidated$1,186,533
 $116,019
 $117,949
 $1,420,501
 $133,693
 $100,947
            
For the three months ended September 30, 2011           
     Specialty$367,417
 $37,438
 $664
 $405,519
 $70,590
 $51,206
     Regional267,142
 16,099
 1,207
 284,448
 (11,163) (4,969)
     Alternative Markets156,820
 25,931
 20,408
 203,159
 32,984
 25,124
     Reinsurance103,906
 18,641
 
 122,547
 16,109
 13,148
     International160,538
 10,741
 
 171,279
 13,919
 9,650
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 5,213
 66,328
 71,541
 (47,531) (31,533)
Net investment gains
 
 21,238
 21,238
 21,238
 13,784
Consolidated$1,055,823
 $114,063
 $109,845
 $1,279,731
 $96,146
 $76,410
            
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:           
Specialty$1,215,417
 $138,491
 $1,788
 $1,355,696
 $204,573
 $145,270
Regional809,072
 60,780
 4,770
 874,622
 79,211
 56,884
Alternative Markets506,149
 116,036
 70,563
 692,748
 141,089
 102,012
Reinsurance327,452
 70,435
 
 397,887
 74,742
 54,837
International575,451
 39,788
 
 615,239
 50,685
 22,553
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 9,358
 175,400
 184,758
 (174,868) (98,196)
Net investment gains
 
 94,003
 94,003
 94,003
 61,743
Consolidated$3,433,541
 $434,888
 $346,524
 $4,214,953
 $469,435
 $345,103
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011:           
Specialty$1,047,567
 $138,868
 $2,065
 $1,188,500
 $237,613
 $170,918
Regional795,423
 59,459
 3,377
 858,259
 (2,770) 5,251
Alternative Markets454,156
 96,072
 64,049
 614,277
 116,007
 86,798
Reinsurance315,220
 72,230
 
 387,450
 66,782
 51,975
International443,198
 32,692
 
 475,890
 27,420
 18,253
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 9,940
 177,303
 187,243
 (154,096) (105,921)
Net investment gains
 
 73,412
 73,412
 73,412
 46,910
Consolidated$3,055,564
 $409,261
 $320,206
 $3,785,031
 $364,368
 $274,184
  
Revenues    
(In thousands)
Earned
Premiums
 
Investment
Income 
 Other Total 
Pre-Tax
Income
(Loss)
 
Net
Income
(Loss)
Three months ended March 31, 2013:           
Insurance-Domestic$884,378
 $97,797
 $26,736
 $1,008,911
 $141,350
 $99,408
Insurance-International171,119
 12,061
 
 183,180
 22,382
 15,477
Reinsurance-Global176,622
 22,499
 
 199,121
 37,941
 26,394
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 3,572
 92,016
 95,588
 (61,419) (37,644)
Net investment gains
 
 19,969
 19,969
 19,969
 12,980
  Total$1,232,119
 $135,929
 $138,721
 $1,506,769
 $160,223
 $116,615
Three months ended March 31, 2012:           
Insurance-Domestic$810,069
 $112,086
 $23,877
 $946,032
 $147,735
 $105,880
Insurance-International143,885
 10,331
 
 154,216
 15,699
 11,112
Reinsurance-Global145,697
 28,687
 
 174,384
 31,638
 23,086
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 6,515
 50,067
 56,582
 (55,260) (35,842)
Net investment gains
 
 47,491
 47,491
 47,491
 31,082
  Total$1,099,651
 $157,619
 $121,435
 $1,378,705
 $187,303
 $135,318
Twelve months ended December 31, 2012:          
Insurance-Domestic$3,417,022
 $424,787
 $103,133
 $3,944,942
 $578,500
 $412,514
Insurance-International631,841
 45,796
 
 677,637
 51,639
 37,499
Reinsurance-Global624,653
 106,932
 
 731,585
 103,690
 76,584
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 9,248
 249,677
 258,925
 (242,366) (152,807)
Net investment gains
 
 210,465
 210,465
 210,465
 136,802
  Total$4,673,516
 $586,763
 $563,275
 $5,823,554
 $701,928
 $510,592
Twelve months ended December 31, 2011:          
Insurance-Domestic$3,121,281
 $372,053
 $92,847
 $3,586,181
 $467,126
 $344,521
Insurance-International508,509
 36,958
 
 545,467
 36,912
 28,054
Reinsurance-Global531,077
 97,795
 
 628,872
 85,271
 66,174
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 19,545
 250,438
 269,983
 (201,704) (129,185)
Net investment gains
 
 125,481
 125,481
 125,481
 81,647
  Total$4,160,867
 $526,351
 $468,766
 $5,155,984
 $513,086
 $391,211
Twelve months ended December 31, 2010:          
Insurance-Domestic$2,963,486
 $385,783
 $85,417
 $3,434,686
 $589,138
 $425,337
Insurance-International378,693
 29,011
 
 407,704
 15,172
 13,050
Reinsurance-Global493,403
 106,862
 
 600,265
 134,996
 99,492
Corporate and eliminations (1)
 8,869
 215,964
 224,833
 (196,977) (128,348)
Net investment gains
 
 56,581
 56,581
 56,581
 36,874
  Total$3,835,582
 $530,525
 $357,962
 $4,724,069
 $598,910
 $446,405


19


Identifiable assets by segment are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
Specialty$6,600,690
 $6,157,853
Regional2,568,126
 2,488,940
Alternative Markets4,324,409
 4,044,915
Reinsurance2,954,710
 2,732,489
International1,880,346
 1,569,749
Corporate and eliminations1,604,631
 1,409,927
Consolidated$19,932,912
 $18,403,873
(Dollars in thousands)March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
Insurance-Domestic$14,023,370
 $14,661,476
 $13,126,472
Insurance-International1,690,937
 1,605,448
 1,341,907
Reinsurance-Global3,420,508
 3,337,937
 3,168,528
Corporate and eliminations985,819
 615,118
 766,966
  Total$20,120,634
 $20,155,896
 $18,403,873
___________
(1) Corporate and eliminations represent corporate revenues and expenses that are not allocated to business segments.


20


Net premiums earned by major line of business are as follows:
 
 For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
Specialty       
Premises operations$135,662
 $119,496
 $386,491
 $331,457
Property68,767
 59,578
 202,602
 174,690
Professional liability63,519
 58,739
 188,680
 167,748
Workers’ compensation43,448
 29,166
 122,228
 86,683
Commercial automobile42,335
 36,440
 121,027
 102,055
Products liability27,444
 24,954
 78,731
 71,856
Other38,990
 39,044
 115,658
 113,078
Total specialty420,165
 367,417
 1,215,417
 1,047,567
Regional       
Commercial multiple peril104,331
 98,200
 305,978
 292,030
Commercial automobile72,486
 72,537
 213,398
 217,021
Workers’ compensation57,194
 55,133
 166,809
 163,602
Other42,618
 41,272
 122,887
 122,770
Total regional276,629
 267,142
 809,072
 795,423
Alternative Markets       
Primary workers’ compensation88,655
 70,172
 243,494
 199,768
Excess workers’ compensation34,179
 40,038
 105,051
 126,940
Accident and health34,461
 27,894
 101,701
 75,002
Other liability8,477
 8,412
 24,756
 21,075
Other11,269
 10,304
 31,147
 31,371
Total alternative markets177,041
 156,820
 506,149
 454,156
Reinsurance       
Casualty80,643
 75,917
 232,698
 228,529
Property30,956
 27,989
 94,754
 86,691
Total reinsurance111,599
 103,906
 327,452
 315,220
International       
Automobile30,557
 26,334
 90,831
 80,585
Casualty reinsurance32,378
 19,650
 88,686
 52,717
Property27,418
 22,327
 79,039
 59,430
Professional liability24,348
 24,982
 74,356
 69,875
Primary workers’ compensation21,102
 18,884
 59,618
 54,480
Marine21,741
 14,487
 59,125
 36,050
Accident and health11,870
 9,994
 39,932
 30,515
Property reinsurance11,250
 6,680
 31,281
 16,062
Other liability14,308
 9,348
 31,919
 23,780
Fidelity and surety6,127
 7,852
 20,664
 19,704
Total international201,099
 160,538
 575,451
 443,198
Total$1,186,533
 $1,055,823
 $3,433,541
 $3,055,564
 For the Three Months Ended
 March 31,
(In thousands)2013 2012
  Insurance-Domestic   
Other liability$295,588
 $273,564
Workers’ compensation229,011
 189,544
Short-tail lines (1)178,749
 173,902
Commercial automobile116,122
 110,367
Products liability64,908
 62,692
Total884,378
 810,069
    
  Insurance-International   
Other liability15,218
 15,534
Workers’ compensation22,889
 18,618
Short-tail lines (1)72,123
 52,478
Commercial automobile34,639
 30,668
Products liability26,250
 26,587
Total171,119
 143,885
    
  Reinsurance-Global   
Casualty121,327
 105,089
Property55,295
 40,608
Total176,622
 145,697
    
Total$1,232,119
 $1,099,651
_____________________
(1) Short-tail lines includes commercial multi-peril (non-liability), inland and ocean marine, accident and health, fidelity and surety, boiler and machinery and other lines.

(21) Subsequent Event


(19) Commitments, Litigation and Contingent Liabilities

The Company's subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and arbitration, arising inOn May 2, 2013, the ordinary courseCompany issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of their insurance and reinsurance businesses. The Company's estimates5.625% Subordinated Debentures due 2053. Net proceeds from this offering will be used for the repayment of $250 million principal amount of the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its aggregate reservesCompany's 6.750% Subordinated Debentures due 2045 on May 26, 2013, which were called for losses and loss expenses, andredemption on April 26, 2013; the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such mattersremainder will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, adverse outcomes are possible and could negatively impact the Company's financial condition and results of operations.be used for general corporate purposes.



2120


SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
This is a “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This document may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continued,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, including statements related to our outlook for the industry and for our performance for the year 20122013 and beyond, are based upon the Company’s historical performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information is not and should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. They are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: the cyclical nature of the property casualty industry; the impact of significant competition; the long-tail and potentially volatile nature of the insurance and reinsurance business; product demand and pricing; claims development and the process of estimating reserves; investment risks, including those of our portfolio of fixed maturity securities and investments in equity securities, including investments in financial institutions, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, loans receivable, investment funds, real estate, merger arbitrage and private equity investments; effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; the uncertain nature of damage theories and loss amounts; natural and man-made catastrophic losses, including as a result of terrorist activities; general economic and market activities, including inflation, interest rates and volatility in the credit and capital markets; the impact of the conditions in the financial markets and the global economy, and the potential effect of any legislative, regulatory, accounting or other initiatives taken in response to it, on our results and financial condition; continued availability of capital and financing; the success of our new ventures or acquisitions and the availability of other opportunities; the availability of reinsurance; our retention under the Terrorism Risk Act of 2002, as amended; the ability of our reinsurers to pay reinsurance recoverables owed to us; foreign currency and political risks relating to our international operations; other legislative and regulatory developments, including those related to business practices in the insurance industry; credit risk relating to our policyholders, independent agents and brokers; changes in the ratings assigned to us or our insurance company subsidiaries by rating agencies; the availability of dividends from our insurance company subsidiaries; our ability to attract and retain key personnel and qualified employees; potential difficulties with technology and/or data security; the effectiveness of our controls to ensure compliance with guidelines, policies and legal and regulatory standards; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These risks and uncertainties could cause our actual results for the year 20122013 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement we make. Any projections of growth in our revenues would not necessarily result in commensurate levels of earnings. Our future financial performance is dependent upon factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Except to the extent required by applicable laws, the Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

2221


Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview
W. R. Berkley Corporation is an insurance holding company that is among the largest commercial lines writers in the United States and operates in fivethree business segments: Specialty, Regional, Alternative Markets, ReinsuranceInsurance-Domestic, Insurance-International and International.Reinsurance-Global. Our decentralized structure provides us with the flexibility to respond quickly and efficiently to local or specific market conditions and to pursue specialty business niches. It also allows us to be closer to our customers in order to better understand their individual needs and risk characteristics. While providing our business units with certain operating autonomy, our structure allows us to capitalize on the benefits of economies of scale through centralized capital, investment, reinsurance and reinsuranceenterprise risk management, and actuarial, financial and corporate legal staff support. The Company’s primary sources of revenues and earnings are its insurance operations and its investments.
An important part of our strategy is to form new operating units to capitalize on various business opportunities, with 2224 of our 4849 units formed since 2006. These newer units are focused on important parts of the economy in the U.S., including healthcare, energy and agriculture, and on growing international markets, including Norway,Scandinavia, Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and South America. As a result, our international operations have become an increasingly important part of our business.
The profitability of the Company’s insurance business is affected primarily by the adequacy of premium rates. The ultimate adequacy of premium rates is not known with certainty at the time a property casualtyan insurance policy is issued because premiums are determined before claims are reported. The ultimate adequacy of premium rates is affected mainly by the severity and frequency of claims, which are influenced by many factors, including natural and other disasters, regulatory measures and court decisions that define and change the extent of coverage and the effects of economic inflation on the amount of compensation for injuries or losses. General insurance prices are also influenced by available insurance capacity, i.e., the level of policyholders’ surplus employed in the industry, and the industry’s willingness to deploy that capital.
Beginning in 2005, the property casualty insurance market became more competitive and insurance rates decreased across most business lines. Increased competition and the impact of the economic downturn also put pressure on policy terms and conditions. While prices began to increase inhave increased since the beginning of 2011, loss costs are also increasing and current market price levels for certain lines of business remain below the prices required for the Company to achieve its long-term return objectives. With its investments in new businesses, the Company believes it is well-positioned to take advantage of new opportunities. Price changes are reflected in the Company’s results over time as premiums are earned.
The Company’s profitability is also affected by its investment income.income and investment gains. The Company’s invested assets, which are derived from its own capital and cash flow from its insurance business, are invested principally in fixed maturity securities. The return on fixed maturity securities is affected primarily by general interest rates, which are at historically low levels, as well as the credit quality and duration of the securities. Returns available on fixed maturity investments are at historically low levels. The Company's investment income has been negatively impacted by the low fixed maturity investment returns, and will be further impacted if investment returns remain at this level.
The Company also invests in equity securities, merger arbitrage, private equity investments, investment funds, loans receivable and real estate. The Company's investments in investment funds have experienced, and the Company expects to continue to experience, greater fluctuations in investment income.

Critical Accounting Estimates
The following presents a discussion of accounting policies and estimates relating to reserves for losses and loss expenses, assumed premiums and other-than-temporary impairments of investments. Management believes these policies and estimates are the most critical to its operations and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments.
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses. To recognize liabilities for unpaid losses, either known or unknown, insurers establish reserves, which is a balance sheet account representing estimates of future amounts needed to pay claims and related expenses with respect to insured events which have occurred. Estimates and assumptions relating to reserves for losses and loss expenses are based on complex and subjective judgments, often including the interplay of specific uncertainties with related accounting and actuarial measurements. Such estimates are also susceptible to change as significant periods of time may elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the report of the loss to the insurer, the ultimate determination of the cost of the loss and the insurer’s payment of that loss.
In general, when a claim is reported, claims personnel establish a “case reserve” for the estimated amount of the ultimate payment based upon known information about the claim at that time. The estimate represents an informed judgment based on general reserving practices and reflects the experience and knowledge of the claims personnel regarding the nature

22


and value of the specific type of claim. Reserves are also established on an aggregate basis to provide for losses incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) to the insurer, potential inadequacy of case reserves and the estimated expenses of settling claims, including legal and other fees and general expenses of administrating the claims adjustment process. Reserves are established based upon the then current legal interpretation of coverage provided.

23


In examining reserve adequacy, several factors are considered in estimating the ultimate economic value of losses. These factors include, among other things, historical data, legal developments, changes in social attitudes and economic conditions, including the effects of inflation. The actuarial process relies on the basic assumption that past experience, adjusted judgmentally for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is an appropriate basis for predicting future outcomes. Reserve amounts are based on management’s informed estimates and judgments using currently available data. As additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, these estimates and judgments may be revised. This may result in reserve increases or decreases that would be reflected in our results in periods in which such estimates and assumptions are changed.
Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, reserves represent an estimate of what management expects the ultimate settlement and claim administration will cost. While the methods for establishing reserves are well tested over time, some of the major assumptions about anticipated loss emergence patterns are subject to unanticipated fluctuation. These estimates, which generally involve actuarial projections, are based on management’s assessment of facts and circumstances then known, as well as estimates of trends in claims severity and frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors, including the actions of third parties which are beyond the Company’s control. These variables are affected by external and internal events, such as inflation and economic volatility, judicial and litigation trends, reinsurance coverage, legislative changes and claim handling and reserving practices, which make it more difficult to accurately predict claim costs. The inherent uncertainties of estimating reserves are greater for certain types of liabilities where long periods of time elapse before a definitive determination of liability is made. Because setting reserves is inherently uncertain, the Company cannot provide assurance that its current reserves will prove adequate in light of subsequent events.
Loss reserves included in the Company’s financial statements represent management’s best estimates based upon an actuarially derived point estimate and other considerations. The Company uses a variety of actuarial techniques and methods to derive an actuarial point estimate for each operating unit. These methods include paid loss development, incurred loss development, paid and incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods and frequency and severity methods. In circumstances where one actuarial method is considered more credible than the others, that method is used to set the point estimate. For example, the paid loss and incurred loss development methods rely on historical paid and incurred loss data. For new lines of business, where there is insufficient history of paid and incurred claims data, or in circumstances where there have been significant changes in claim practices, the paid and incurred loss development methods would be less credible than other actuarial methods. The actuarial point estimate may also be based on a judgmental weighting of estimates produced from each of the methods considered. Industry loss experience is used to supplement the Company’s own data in selecting “tail factors” and in areas where the Company’s own data is limited. The actuarial data is analyzed by line of business, coverage and accident or policy year, as appropriate, for each operating unit.
The establishment of the actuarially derived loss reserve point estimate also includes consideration of qualitative factors that may affect the ultimate losses. These qualitative considerations include, among others, the impact of re-underwriting initiatives, changes in the mix of business, changes in distribution sources and changes in policy terms and conditions. Examples of changes in terms and conditions that can have a significant impact on reserve levels are the use of aggregate policy limits, the expansion of coverage exclusions, whether or not defense costs are within policy limits, and changes in deductibles and attachment points.
The key assumptions used to arrive at the best estimate of loss reserves are the expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation, and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Expected loss ratios represent management’s expectation of losses at the time the business is written, before any actual claims experience has emerged. This expectation is a significant determinant of the estimate of loss reserves for recently written business where there is little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Expected loss ratios are generally derived from historical loss ratios adjusted for the impact of rate changes, loss cost trends and known changes in the type of risks underwritten. Expected loss ratios are estimated for each key line of business within each operating unit. Expected loss cost inflation is particularly important for the long-tail lines, such as excess casualty, and claims with a high medical component, such as workers’ compensation. Reported and paid loss emergence patterns are used to project current reported or paid loss amounts to their ultimate settlement value. Loss development factors are based on the historical emergence patterns of paid and incurred losses, and are derived from the Company’s own experience and industry data. The paid loss emergence pattern is also significant to excess and assumed workers’ compensation reserves because those reserves are discounted to their estimated present value based upon such estimated payout patterns. Management believes the estimates and assumptions it makes in the reserving process provide the best estimate of the ultimate cost of settling claims and related expenses with respect to insured events which have occurred; however, different assumptions and variables could lead to significantly different reserve estimates.

23


Loss frequency and severity are measures of loss activity that are considered in determining the key assumptions described in our discussion of loss and loss expense reserves, including expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Loss frequency is a measure of the number of claims per unit of insured exposure, and loss severity is a measure of the average size of claims. Factors affecting loss frequency include the effectiveness of loss

24


controls and safety programs and changes in economic activity or weather patterns. Factors affecting loss severity include changes in policy limits, retentions, rate of inflation and judicial interpretations.
Another factor affecting estimates of loss frequency and severity is the loss reporting lag, which is the period of time between the occurrence of a loss and the date the loss is reported to the Company. The length of the loss reporting lag affects our ability to accurately predict loss frequency (loss frequencies are more predictable for lines with short reporting lags) as well as the amount of reserves needed for incurred but not reported losses (less IBNR is required for lines with short reporting lags). As a result, loss reserves for lines with short reporting lags are likely to have less variation from initial loss estimates. For lines with short reporting lags, which include commercial automobile, primary workers’ compensation, other liability (claims-made) and property business, the key assumption is the loss emergence pattern used to project ultimate loss estimates from known losses paid or reported to date. For lines of business with long reporting lags, which include other liability (occurrence), products liability, excess workers’ compensation and liability reinsurance, the key assumption is the expected loss ratio since there is often little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Historically, the Company has experienced less variation from its initial loss estimates for lines of businesses with short reporting lags than for lines of business with long reporting lags.
The key assumptions used in calculating the most recent estimate of the loss reserves are reviewed each quarter and adjusted, to the extent necessary, to reflect historical changes, current trends and other factors observed. If the actual level of loss frequency and severity are higher or lower than expected, the ultimate losses will be different than management’s estimate. The following table reflects the impact of changes (which could be favorable or unfavorable) in frequency and severity, relative to our assumptions, on our loss estimate for claims occurring in 20112012 (dollars in thousands):
Frequency (+/-)Frequency (+/-)
Severity (+/-)1% 5% 10%1% 5% 10%
1%$56,116
 $168,908
 $309,896
$60,260
 $181,379
 $332,777
5%168,908
 286,166
 432,738
181,379
 307,294
 464,689
10%309,896
 432,738
 586,291
332,777
 464,689
 629,579
Our net reserves for losses and loss expenses of approximately $8.3$8.5 billion as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 relate to multiple accident years. Therefore, the impact of changes in frequency or severity for more than one accident year could be significantly higher or lower than the amounts reflected above.
Approximately $1.4$1.6 billion, or 16.5%19%, of the Company’s net loss reserves as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 relate to the reinsuranceReinsurance-Global segment. There is a higher degree of uncertainty and greater variability regarding estimates of assumed loss reserves because those estimates are based, in part, upon information received from ceding companies. If information received from ceding companies is not timely or correct, the Company’s estimate of ultimate losses may not be accurate. Furthermore, due to delayed reporting of claim information by ceding companies, the claim settlement tail for assumed reinsurance is extended. Management considers the impact of delayed reporting in its selection of assumed loss development factors.
Information received from ceding companies is used to set initial expected loss ratios, to establish case reserves and to estimate reserves for incurred but not reported losses on assumed reinsurance business. This information, which is generally provided through reinsurance intermediaries, is gathered through the underwriting process and from periodic claim reports and other correspondence with ceding companies. The Company performs underwriting and claim audits of selected ceding companies to determine the accuracy and completeness of information provided to the Company. The information received from the ceding companies is supplemented by the Company’s own loss development experience with similar lines of business as well as industry loss trends and loss development benchmarks.







2524

Table of Contents

Following is a summary of the Company’s reserves for losses and loss expenses by business segment as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012:
 
(Dollars in thousands)September 30, December 31,
 2012 2011
Specialty$2,949,949
 $2,905,759
Regional1,277,441
 1,283,764
Alternative Markets2,059,019
 1,986,111
Reinsurance1,376,199
 1,439,136
International657,019
 557,342
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses8,319,627
 8,172,112
Ceded reserves for losses and loss expenses1,243,250
 1,165,022
Gross reserves for losses and loss expenses$9,562,877
 $9,337,134
(In thousands)March 31 December 31,
 2013 2012
Insurance-Domestic$6,345,559
 $6,297,773
Insurance-International536,502
 540,769
Reinsurance-Global1,584,633
 1,573,309
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses8,466,694
 8,411,851
Ceded reserves for losses and loss expenses1,343,149
 1,339,235
Gross reserves for losses and loss expenses$9,809,843
 $9,751,086
Following is a summary of the Company’s net reserves for losses and loss expenses by major line of business as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Reported Case
Reserves
 
Incurred But
Not Reported
 Total
September 30, 2012     
General liability$983,123
 $1,893,580
 $2,876,703
(In thousands)
Reported Case
Reserves
 
Incurred But
Not Reported
 Total
March 31, 2013     
Other liability$931,703
 $1,845,104
 $2,776,807
Workers’ compensation1,367,359
 1,067,002
 2,434,361
1,449,415
 1,126,527
 2,575,942
Short-tail lines239,397
 209,432
 448,829
Commercial automobile260,814
 191,600
 452,414
277,563
 197,905
 475,468
International351,155
 305,864
 657,019
Other205,724
 317,207
 522,931
Products liability280,900
 324,115
 605,015
Total primary3,168,175
 3,775,253
 6,943,428
3,178,978
 3,703,083
 6,882,061
Reinsurance574,206
 801,993
 1,376,199
647,161
 937,472
 1,584,633
Total$3,742,381
 $4,577,246
 $8,319,627
$3,826,139
 $4,640,555
 $8,466,694
December 31, 2011     
General liability$890,238
 $1,974,361
 $2,864,599
December 31, 2012     
Other liability$922,568
 $1,863,465
 $2,786,033
Workers’ compensation1,353,328
 992,775
 2,346,103
1,427,599
 1,114,340
 2,541,939
Short-tail lines240,411
 205,272
 445,683
Commercial automobile275,198
 195,323
 470,521
275,322
 204,900
 480,222
International277,857
 279,485
 557,342
Other200,969
 293,442
 494,411
Products liability271,854
 312,811
 584,665
Total primary2,997,590
 3,735,386
 6,732,976
3,137,754
 3,700,788
 6,838,542
Reinsurance584,909
 854,227
 1,439,136
626,962
 946,347
 1,573,309
Total$3,582,499
 $4,589,613
 $8,172,112
$3,764,716
 $4,647,135
 $8,411,851
Reserves for excess and assumed workers’ compensation business are net of an aggregate net discount of $864$858 million and $892$867 million as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively.


2625

Table of Contents

The following table presents development in our estimate of claims occurring in prior years: 
 For the Nine Months Ended
 September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011
Favorable (unfavorable) reserve development:   
Specialty$39,008
 $96,625
Regional13,654
 25,277
Alternative markets3,524
 (2,088)
Reinsurance22,950
 18,674
International230
 3,611
Total favorable reserve development79,366
 142,099
Premium offsets(1):   
Specialty
 321
Alternative markets
 (20)
International3,228
 
Net development$82,594
 $142,400
 For the Three Months Ended
 March 31
(In thousands)2013 2012
Favorable reserve development:   
Insurance-Domestic$4,180
 $14,070
Insurance-International3,307
 2,562
Reinsurance-Global16,059
 8,542
Total favorable reserve development$23,546
 $25,174
         _____________
(1) Represents portion of reserve development offset by additional or return premiums on retrospectively rated insurance policies and reinsurance agreements.
For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012,March 31, 2013, estimates for claims occurring in prior years decreased by $83$24 million. The favorable reserve development in 20122013 was primarily attributable to accident years 2008 through 2010.2010 and 2012, and was partially offset by unfavorable reserve development for accident year 2011. The changes in prior year loss reserve estimates are generally the result of ongoing analysis of recent loss development trends. Original estimates are increased or decreased as additional information becomes known regarding individual claims and aggregate claim trends.

SpecialtyInsurance - The majority of the favorable reserve development for the specialty segment during 2012 and 2011 was associated with excess and surplus (“E&S”) casualty business. E&S insurers are free from rate and form regulation and generally charge higher rates for business than those that are charged in the “standard” market. Beginning in 2002, the E&S business began to experience improved claim frequency (i.e., a lower number of reported claims per unit of exposure). One reason for the lower number of claims was the Company’s introduction of more restrictive policy language which included additional exclusions that eliminated claims that would have previously been covered, particularly for the Company’s building contractor business. In addition, as standard carriers tightened their underwriting criteria, the Company benefited from an influx of accounts from the standard market to the E&S market during these years. The more restrictive policy language and the influx of standard market business resulted in an improved risk profile within the E&S business and a reduction in loss costs that was not expected at the time loss reserves were initially established. In addition, loss severity trends for E&S casualty business have been lower than we had initially expected for the 2005 to 2009 period. We began to recognize these trends in 2007 and have continued to reduce our estimates of ultimate claim costs since then as the magnitude of the frequency trends has become more evident. The favorable reserve development in 2012 was primarily attributable to accident years 2007 through 2010.
RegionalDomestic - Favorable reserve development for thein 2013 related primarily to our excess and surplus lines casualty business and our regional segment relatedcompanies, although occurring at a lower rate than in 2012. In 2013, we also continued to commercial multi-peril business,see favorable reserve development in our excess medical malpractice and excess professional liability lines of business. This favorable reserve development was partially offset by modest adverseunfavorable development on workers' compensationin our primary professional liability and aviation lines of business. The favorable development for commercial multi-peril business was driven by the 2008 and 2009 accident years and resulted mainly from lower loss emergence on known case reserves relative to historical levels.

ReinsuranceInsurance - International - Reserve development in 2013 was primarily related to property business in the 2012 accident year.

Reinsurance-Global - The favorable development for the reinsurance segmentin 2013 was primarily related to facultative program business and to business written through Lloyd’s of London.the Company's minority participation in a Lloyd's syndicate. The favorable development was concentrated in underwriting years 20082010 through 20112012 and resulted from lower than expected reported losses.




27

Table of Contents


Loss Reserve Discount - The Company discounts its liabilities for excess and assumed workers’ compensation business because of the long period of time over which losses are paid. Discounting is intended to appropriately match losses and loss expenses to income earned on investment securities supporting the liabilities. The expected losses and loss expense payout pattern subject to discounting was derived from the Company’s loss payout experience. For non-proportional business, reserves for losses and loss expenses have been discounted using risk-free discount rates determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve. For proportional business, reserves for losses and loss expenses have been discounted at the statutory rate permitted by the Department of Insurance of the State of Delaware of 2.3%2.2%. As of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the aggregate blended discount rates ranged from 2.1% to 6.5%, with a weighted average discount rate of 4.3%4.4%. The aggregate net discount, after reflecting the effects of ceded reinsurance, was $864$858 million and $892$867 million as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively.
Assumed Reinsurance Premiums. The Company estimates the amount of assumed reinsurance premiums that it will receive under treaty reinsurance agreements at the inception of the contracts. These premium estimates are revised as the actual amount of assumed premiums is reported to the Company by the ceding companies. As estimates of assumed premiums are made or revised, the related amount of earned premiums, commissions and incurred losses associated with those premiums are recorded. Estimated assumed premiums receivable were approximately $66$56 million and $64$73 million at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively. The assumed premium estimates are based upon terms set forth in reinsurance agreements, information received from ceding companies during the underwriting and negotiation of agreements, reports received from ceding companies and discussions and correspondence with reinsurance intermediaries. The Company also considers its own view of market conditions, economic trends and experience with similar lines of business. These premium estimates represent management’s best estimate of the ultimate amount of premiums to be received under its assumed reinsurance agreements.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (OTTI) of Investments. The cost of securities is adjusted where appropriate to include a provision for decline in value which is considered to be other-than-temporary. An other-than-temporary decline is considered to occur in investments where there has been a sustained reduction in fair value and where the Company does not expect the fair value to recover prior to the time of sale or maturity. Since equity securities do not have a contractual cash flow or maturity, the Company considers whether the price of an equity security is expected to recover within a reasonable period of time.

26

Table of Contents

The Company classifies its fixed maturity securities and preferred stocks by credit rating, primarily based on ratings assigned by credit rating agencies. For purposes of classifying securities with different ratings, the Company uses the lower rating if two ratings were assigned and the middle rating if three ratings were assigned, unless the Company’s own analysis indicates that the lower rating is more appropriate. Securities that are not rated by a rating agency are evaluated and classified by the Company on a case-by-case basis.
Fixed Maturity Securities – For securities that we intend to sell or, more likely than not, would be required to sell, a decline in value below amortized cost is considered to be OTTI. The amount of OTTI is equal to the difference between amortized cost and fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that we do not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell, a decline in value below amortized cost is considered to be an OTTI if we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a security (i.e., the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security).
The portion of the decline in value considered to be a credit loss (i.e., the difference between the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis of the security) is recognized in earnings. The portion of the decline in value not considered to be a credit loss (i.e., the difference in the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the fair value of the security) is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Impairment assessments for structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations and corporate debt, are generally evaluated based on the performance of the underlying collateral under various economic and default scenarios that may involve subjective judgments and estimates by management. Modeling these securities involves various factors, such as projected default rates, the nature and realizable value of the collateral, if any, the ability of the issuer to make scheduled payments, historical performance and other relevant economic and performance factors. If an OTTI determination is made, a discounted cash flow analysis is used to ascertain the amount of the credit impairment.


28

Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
Unrealized loss less than 20% of amortized cost212
 $1,067,413
 $27,681
181
 $1,261,456
 $26,020
Unrealized loss of 20% or greater of amortized cost:          
Nine months to less then twelve months1
 132
 120
Twelve months and longer9
 41,153
 12,965
6
 2,257
 1,272
Total222
 $1,108,698
 $40,766
187
 $1,263,713
 $27,292
A summary of the Company’s non-investment grade fixed maturity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 is presented in the table below.
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
Number of
Securities
 
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
Unrealized loss less than $5 million:     
Unrealized loss greater than $5 million
 $
 $
Unrealized loss less than $5 million     
Mortgage-backed securities13
 $71,135
 $4,908
12
 54,367
 2,925
Corporate11
 28,841
 2,003
9
 28,242
 3,172
State and municipal4
 32,625
 2,197
2
 24,654
 1,264
Foreign1
 11,513
 7
Total28
 $132,601
 $9,108
24
 $118,776
 $7,368
The Company has evaluated its fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position and believes the unrealized loss areis due primarily to temporary market and sector-related factors rather than to issuer-specific factors. None of these securities are delinquent or in default under financial covenants. Based on its assessment of these issuers, the Company expects them to continue to meet their contractual payment obligations as they become due and does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.

27

Table of Contents

Preferred Stocks – At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, there were fivetwo preferred stocks in an unrealized loss position, with an aggregate fair value of $47 million and a gross unrealized loss of $3 million. Four of those preferred stocks with an aggregate fair value of $2125 million and a gross unrealized loss of $2 million were. One of those preferred stocks with a gross unrealized loss of $0.2 million was rated non-investment grade. Based upon management's view of the underlying value of theirthese securities, the Company does not consider either of these preferred stocks to be OTTI.
Common Stocks – At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the Company owned threetwo common stocks in an unrealized loss position with an aggregate fair value of $3531 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $0.31 million. The Company does not consider these common stocks to be OTTI.
Loans Receivable – The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable, including current market conditions for each loan and the ability to collect principal and interest. For loans where the Company determines it is probable that the contractual terms will not be met, an analysis is performed and a valuation reserve is established, if necessary, with a charge to earnings. Loans receivable are reported net of a valuation reserve of $6 million and $20 million at both September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively..
The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable and assesses the ability of the borrower to pay principal and interest based upon loan structure, underlying property values, cash flow and related financial and operating performance of the property and market conditions. Loans receivable with a potential for default are further assessed using discounted cash flow analysis and comparable cost and sales methodologies, if appropriate.
Fair Value Measurements. The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale and its trading account securities are carried at fair value. Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The fair value of the vast majority of the Company’s portfolio is based on observable data (other than quoted prices) and, accordingly, is classified as Level 2.


29

Table of Contents

In classifying particular financial securities in the fair value hierarchy, the Company uses its judgment to determine whether the market for a security is active and whether significant pricing inputs are observable. The Company determines the existence of an active market by assessing whether transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide reliable pricing information. The Company determines whether inputs are observable based on the use of such information by pricing services and external investment managers, the uninterrupted availability of such inputs, the need to make significant adjustments to such inputs and the volatility of such inputs over time. If the market for a security is determined to be inactive or if significant inputs used to price a security are determined to be unobservable, the security is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Because many fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis, the Company utilizes pricing models and processes which may include benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. Market inputs used to evaluate securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. Quoted prices are often unavailable for recently issued securities that are infrequently traded or securities that are only traded in private transactions. For publicly traded securities for which quoted prices are unavailable, the Company determines fair value based on independent broker quotations and other observable market data. For securities traded only in private negotiations, the Company determines fair value based primarily on the cost of such securities, which is adjusted to reflect prices of recent placements of securities of the same issuer, financial data, projections and business developments of the issuer and other relevant information.

28

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of pricing sources for the Company's fixed maturity securities available for sale as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying
Value
 
Percent
of Total
Carrying
Value
 
Percent
of Total
Pricing source:      
Independent pricing services$10,932,098
 92.7%$10,564,047
 91.3%
Syndicate manager75,875
 0.6%91,244
 0.8%
Directly by the Company based on:      
Observable data715,572
 6.1%851,754
 7.4%
Cash flow model65,504
 0.6%55,769
 0.5%
Total$11,789,049
 100.0%$11,562,814
 100.0%
Independent pricing services - The vast majority of the Company’s fixed maturity securities available for sale were priced by independent pricing services (generally one U.S. pricing service plus additional pricing services with respect to a limited number of foreign securities held by the Company). The prices provided by the independent pricing services are generally based on observable market data in active markets (e.g., broker quotes and prices observed for comparable securities). The determination of whether markets are active or inactive is based upon the volume and level of activity for a particular asset class. The Company reviews the prices provided by pricing services for reasonableness based upon current trading levels for similar securities. If the prices appear unusual to the Company, they are re-examined and the value is either confirmed or revised. In addition, the Company periodically performs independent price tests of a sample of securities to ensure proper valuation and to verify our understanding of how securities are priced. As of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the Company did not make any adjustments to the prices provided by the pricing services. Based upon the Company’s review of the methodologies used by the independent pricing services, these securities were classified as Level 2.
Syndicate manager – The Company has a 15% participation in a Lloyd’s syndicate, and the Company’s share of the securities owned by the syndicate is priced by the syndicate’s manager. The majority of the securities are liquid, short duration fixed maturity securities. The Company reviews the syndicate manager’s pricing methodology and audited financial statements and holds discussions with the syndicate manager as necessary to confirm its understanding and agreement with security prices. Based upon the Company’s review of the methodologies used by the syndicate manager, these securities were classified as Level 2.
Observable data – If independent pricing is not available, the Company prices the securities directly. Prices are based on observable market data where available, including current trading levels for similar securities and non-binding quotations from brokers. The Company generally requests two or more quotes. If more than one quote is received, the Company sets a price within the range of quotes received based on its assessment of the credibility of the quote and its own evaluation of the security. The Company generally does not adjust quotes obtained from brokers. Since these securities were priced based on observable data, they were classified as Level 2.

30

Table of Contents

Cash flow model – If the above methodologies are not available, the Company prices securities using a discounted cash flow model based upon assumptions as to prevailing credit spreads, interest rates and interest rate volatility, time to maturity and subordination levels. Discount rates are adjusted to reflect illiquidity where appropriate. These securities were classified as Level 3.





3129

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the NineThree Months Ended September 30,March 31, 20122013 and 20112012
 
Business Segment Results
Following is a summary of gross and net premiums written, premiums earned, loss ratios (losses and loss expenses incurred expressed as a percentage of premiums earned), expense ratios (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) combined ratios (sum of loss ratio and expense ratio) for each of our business segments for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 20122013 and 20112012. The GAAP combined ratio represents a measure of underwriting profitability, excluding investment income. A GAAP combined ratio in excess of 100 indicates an underwriting loss; a number below 100 indicates an underwriting profit. See the further discussion of the change to our business segments in Note 20 to the interim consolidated financial statements.
(Dollars in thousands)2012 20112013
 2012
Specialty   
Insurance-Domestic:   
Gross premiums written$1,526,265
 $1,344,139
$1,179,722
 $1,038,434
Net premiums written1,295,556
 1,146,091
986,180
 882,943
Premiums earned1,215,417
 1,047,567
Net premiums earned884,378
 810,069
Loss ratio61.8% 57.8%62.4% 62.9%
Expense ratio32.8% 32.9%33.1% 33.2%
GAAP combined ratio94.6% 90.7%95.5% 96.1%
Regional   
Insurance-International:   
Gross premiums written$926,242
 $881,224
$251,575
 $200,504
Net premiums written852,971
 817,380
205,135
 167,994
Premiums earned809,072
 795,423
Net premiums earned171,119
 143,885
Loss ratio60.8% 71.5%55.8% 57.3%
Expense ratio36.5% 36.2%38.0% 40.3%
GAAP combined ratio97.3% 107.7%93.8% 97.6%
Alternative Markets   
Reinsurance-Global:   
Gross premiums written$764,643
 $656,062
$200,324
 $162,588
Net premiums written556,067
 497,117
185,651
 152,589
Premiums earned506,149
 454,156
Net premiums earned176,622
 145,697
Loss ratio72.4% 71.9%55.0% 60.2%
Expense ratio25.8% 26.8%36.3% 37.6%
GAAP combined ratio98.2% 98.7%91.3% 97.8%
Reinsurance   
Consolidated:   
Gross premiums written$373,912
 $337,696
$1,631,621
 $1,401,526
Net premiums written349,361
 319,524
1,376,966
 1,203,526
Premiums earned327,452
 315,220
Net premiums earned1,232,119
 1,099,651
Loss ratio57.8% 60.9%60.4% 61.8%
Expense ratio40.8% 40.7%34.3% 34.7%
GAAP combined ratio98.6% 101.6%94.7% 96.5%
International   
Gross premiums written$736,108
 $602,313
Net premiums written616,449
 486,745
Premiums earned575,451
 443,198
Loss ratio60.5% 61.6%
Expense ratio38.2% 39.9%
GAAP combined ratio98.7% 101.5%
Consolidated   
Gross premiums written$4,327,170
 $3,821,434
Net premiums written3,670,404
 3,266,857
Premiums earned3,433,541
 3,055,564
Loss ratio62.5% 64.3%
Expense ratio34.3% 34.7%
GAAP combined ratio96.8% 99.0%


32

Table of Contents

Net Income to Common StockholdersStockholders.. The following table presents the Company’sCompany's net income to common stockholders and net income per diluted share for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 2012:2011 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
2012 2011
(In thousands, except per share data)2013 2012
Net income to common stockholders$345,103
 $274,184
$116,615
 $135,318
Weighted average diluted shares142,941
 146,553
141,223
 143,411
Net income per diluted share$2.41
 $1.87
$0.83
 $0.94
The Company reported net income of $345$117 million in 20122013 compared to $274$135 million in 2011.2012. The increasedecrease in net income was primarily due to decreases in after-tax net investment gains of $18 million and in after-tax net investment income of $15 million, partially offset by an increase in after-tax underwriting income of $51 million, an increase in after-tax net investment income of $18 million and an increase in after-tax net investment gains of $15$17 million. The number of weighted average diluted shares decreased as a result of the Company’s repurchases of its common stock in 2012 and 2011.2012.

30

Table of Contents

Premiums. Gross premiums written were $4,327$1,632 million in 2012,2013, an increase of 13%16% from $3,821$1,402 million in 2011. The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to growth in our international and specialty business segments as a result of rate increases and expansion into new geographic and product markets.2012. The growth was due to a combination of rate increases and increased exposures.exposures, including expansion into new geographic and product markets. Approximately 78%76.4% of policies expiring in 20122013 were renewed, compared with a 80%77.5% renewal retention rate for policies expiring in 2011.2012. The average rate (i.e., average premium adjusted for change in exposures) for policies that renewed in 20122013 increased by approximately 6.4%7.3%. Audit premiums were $67$31 million in 20122013 compared with $35$22 million in 2011.2012.
From 2005 through 2010, the property casualty insurance market was highly competitive and insurance rates decreased across most business lines. Prices began to increase in 2011, and the rate of increase accelerated in 2012. Cumulatively, our average rates have increased 15% since the first nine monthsend of 2012.2010. However, overall loss costs are also generally increasing, and current market price levels for certain lines of business remain below the prices required for the Company to achieve its long-term return objectives. A summary of gross premiums written in 20122013 compared with 20112012 by line of business within each business segment follows:
SpecialtyInsurance-Domestic premiums increased 14% to $1,526$1,180 million in 20122013 from $1,344$1,038 million in 2011 primarily due to increased business in the energy and environmental markets.2012. Gross premiums increased $49$67 million (22%) for workers' compensation, $40 million (12%) for other liability, $49$18 million (18%(8%) for propertyshort-tail lines, $41$13 million (39%) for workers' compensation, $22 million (19%) for commercial automobile, $16 million (7%) for professional liability and $6 million (8%) for products liability and decreased $1 million for other lines.
Regional gross premiums increased 5% to $926 million in 2012 from $881 million in 2011. Gross premiums increased $32 million (10%) for commercial multiple peril, $11 million (6%) for workers’ compensation and $3 million (1%(2%) for commercial automobile.
Alternative marketsInsurance-International gross premiums increased 17%25% to $765$252 million in 20122013 from $656$201 million in 2011. Excluding assigned risk plans, which are fully reinsured,2012. Gross premiums increased $43 million (43%) for short-tail lines, $4 million (22%) for workers' compensation, $2 million (8%) for professional liability, $1 million (5%) for other liability and $1 million (3%) for commercial automobile.
Reinsurance-Global gross premiums increased 12%23% to $605$200 million in 20122013 from $542$163 million in 2011.2012. Gross premiums increased $68$18 million (31%(36%) for primary workers’ compensation, $25property business and $19 million (26%) for accident and health products and $3 million (8%) for other liability. Gross premiums decreased $29 million (20%) for excess workers' compensation and $3 million (7%) for other lines.
Reinsurance gross premiums increased 11% to $374 million in 2012 from $338 million in 2011. Gross premiums increased $6 million (3%(18%) for casualty business and $30 million (28%) for property business.
International gross premiums increased 22% to $736 million in 2012 from $602 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in business written by our Lloyd’s operation, our companies in Australia, and new insurance branches in Germany and Norway. Gross premiums increased $46 million (75%) for marine, $28 million (37%) for casualty reinsurance, $21 million (80%) for property reinsurance, $13 million (15%) for property, $12 million (35%) for accident and health and $14 million (4%) for other lines.
Net premiums written were $3,670$1,377 million in 2012,2013, an increase of 12%14% from $3,267$1,204 million in 2011.2012. Ceded reinsurance premiums as a percentage of gross written premiums were 15%16% in 20122013 and 14% in 2011.2012. The increase in the percentage of business ceded was due to changes in theexpanded reinsurance termsprotection for certain lines of business and costs.to disproportionately higher growth by companies that purchase more reinsurance protection.
Premiums earned increased 12% to $3,434$1,232 million in 20122013 from $3,056$1,100 million in 2011.2012. Insurance premiums (including the impact of rate changes) are generally earned evenly over the policy term, and accordingly we expect to recognize recent rate increases over the upcoming quarters. Premiums earned in 20122013 are related to business written during both 20122013 and 2011.2012.


33

Table of Contents

Net Investment Income. Following is a summary of net investment income for the ninethree months ended September 30,2012March 31, 2013 and 2012:2011:
 
($ in thousands)Amount 
Average Annualized
Yield
Amount 
Average Annualized
Yield
2013 2012 2013 2012
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
Fixed maturity securities, including cash and cash equivalents and loans receivable$360,577
 $365,365
 3.8% 4.0%$117,836
 $119,288
 3.7% 3.8%
Arbitrage trading account8,938
 10,696
 3.7
 4.0
3,783
 6,481
 3.7
 8.5
Investment funds50,124
 21,069
 10.2
 4.8
10,934
 27,623
 5.7
 17.8
Equity securities available for sale10,980
 9,544
 3.8
 3.5
2,247
 3,150
 2.9
 3.5
Real estate8,621
 5,192
 3.1
 6.0
3,141
 2,176
 2.1
 2.5
Gross investment income439,240
 411,866
 4.1% 4.0%137,941
 158,718
 3.7% 4.5%
Investment expenses(4,352) (2,605)    (2,012) (1,099)    
Total$434,888
 $409,261
 4.0% 4.0%$135,929
 $157,619
 3.7% 4.5%
Net investment income increased 6%decreased 14% to $435$136 million in 20122013 from $409$158 million in 2011.2012. The increasedecrease in investment income was primarily due to an increasedecrease in income from investmentenergy and real estate funds (which(investment funds are reported on a one quarter lag). The average annualized yield for fixed maturity securities declined from 4.0%3.8% to 3.8%3.7% due to lower long-term reinvestment yields available in the market. Average invested assets, at cost (including cash and cash equivalents) were $14.5$14.8 billion in 20122013 and $13.6$14.2 billion in 2011.2012.
Insurance Service Fees. The Company is a servicing carrier of worker'sworkers' compensation assigned risk plans for 20 states and provides insurance program management services to self-insureds, captives, governmental entities, risk retention groups, and insurance companies. Service fees were $77$27 million in 2012,2013, up from $69$24 million in 2011,2012, primarily as a result of an increase in fees from assigned risk plans.

31

Table of Contents

Net Realized Gains on Investment Sales. The Company buys and sells securities on a regular basis in order to maximize its total return on investments. Decisions to sell securities are based on management’s view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as management’s expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads, currency values and general economic conditions. Net realized gains on investment sales were $85$20 million in 20122013 compared with $74$43 million in 2011.2012.
Change in Valuation Allowance, Net of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. For loans where the Company determines it is probable that the contractual terms will not be met, an analysis is performed and a valuation reserve is established, if necessary, with a charge to earnings. The cost of securities is adjusted where appropriate to include a provision for a decline in value whichthat is considered to be other-than-temporary. In 2012, the valuation allowance for mortgage loans decreased by $14$7 million. The change in valuation allowance, net ofThere were no other-than-temporary impairments was a decrease of $9in 2013 compared with $3 million in 2012 compared with an increase of $0.4 million in 2011.2012.
Revenues from Wholly-Owned Investees. These revenuesRevenues from wholly-owned investees were derived from aviation-related businesses that provide services to the general aviation market, including fuel and line service, aircraft sales and maintenance, avionics and engineering services and parts fabrication. Revenues from wholly-owned investees decreasedincreased to $173$92 million in 20122013 from $176$50 million in 2011,2012, primarily as a result of lowerthe acquisition of an aircraft sales.equipment supplier in January 2013.
Losses and Loss Expenses. Losses and loss expenses increased to $2,147$745 million in 20122013 from $1,965$679 million in 2011.2012. The consolidated loss ratio was 62.5%60.4% in 2012 and 64.3%2013, down from 61.8% in 2011.2012. Catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance recoveries and reinstatement premiums, were $39$5 million in 20122013 compared with $139$4 million in 2011, a decrease of 3.5 loss ratio points.2012. Favorable prior year reserve development was $83$24 million in 2013 compared with $25 million in 2012, compared with $142 million in 2011, a difference of 2.30.4 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development decreased 0.61.8 points to 63.8%61.9% in 20122013 from 64.4%63.7% in 2011.2012. A summary of loss ratios in 20122013 compared with 20112012 by business segment follows:
SpecialtyInsurance-Domestic - The loss ratio of 61.8%62.4% in 20122013 was 4.0 points higher than the loss ratio of 57.8% in 2011. Catastrophe losses were $11 million in 2012 compared with $16 million in 2011. Favorable prior year reserve development was $39 million in 2012 compared with $97 million in 2011, a difference of 6.0 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding prior year reserve development decreased 1.5 points to 64.1% in 2012 from 65.6% in 2011.
Regional - The loss ratio of 60.8% in 2012 was 10.70.5 points lower than the loss ratio of 71.5%62.9% in 2011.2012. Catastrophe losses were $24$4 million in 2012 compared with $85 million2013, the same as in 2011, an decrease of 7.8 loss ratio points.2012. Favorable prior year reserve development was $4 million in 2013 compared with $14 million in 2012, compared with $25 million in 2011, a difference of 1.51.2 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development decreased 4.41.6 points to 59.6%62.5% in 20122013 from 64.0%64.1% in 2011 due to favorable pricing and loss cost trends.2012.

34

Table of Contents

Alternative MarketsInsurance-International - The loss ratio of 55.8% in 2013 was 72.4%1.5 points lower than the loss ratio of 57.3% in 2012 and 71.9% in 2011.2012. Favorable prior year reserve development was $4 million in 20122013 compared with unfavorable development of $2$3 million in 2011, a difference of 1.2 loss ratio points.2012. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development increased 1.9decreased 1.5 points to 73.0%57.6% in 2013 from 59.1% in 2012 from 71.1% in 2011.due to favorable pricing and loss cost trends.
ReinsuranceReinsurance-Global - The loss ratio of 57.8%55.0% in 20122013 was 3.15.2 points lower than the loss ratio of 60.9%60.2% in 2011. Catastrophe losses2012. There were $1 million in catastrophe losses in 2013 compared with none in 2012, compared to $18 million in 2011, a decreasean increase of 5.30.6 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $23$16 million in 2013 and $8 million in 2012, compared with $18 million in 2011, a difference of 1.13.3 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development increased 3.3 points to 64.5% in 2012 from 61.2% in 2011.
International - The loss ratio of 60.5% in 2012 was 1.1 points lower than the loss ratio of 61.6% in 2011. There were $2 million in catastrophe losses in 2012 compared with $19 million in 2011, a decrease of 3.8 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $3 million in 2012 and $4 million in 2011, a difference of 0.2 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development increaseddecreased 2.5 points to 60.7%63.5% in 2013 from 66.0% in 2012 from 58.2% in 2011.due to lower property losses.
Other Operating Costs and Expenses. Following is a summary of other operating costs and expenses for 2012 and 2011:expenses:
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011
(In thousands)2013 2012
Underwriting expenses$1,177,620
 $1,059,485
$422,213
 $382,023
Service expenses63,996
 55,764
22,305
 19,592
Net foreign currency gains(2,873) (2,171)
Net foreign currency losses (gains)1,947
 (1,434)
Other costs and expenses93,281
 83,858
35,139
 31,598
Total$1,332,024
 $1,196,936
$481,604
 $431,779
Underwriting expenses are comprised of commissions paid to agents and brokers, premium taxes and other assessments and internal underwriting costs. Underwriting expenses increased 11% compared with an increase in net premiums written of 12%14%. The expense ratio (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) was 34.3% in 20122013 and 34.7% in 2011.2012, reflecting the increase in earned premium.
Service expenses, which represent the costs associated with the fee-based businesses, increased 15%14% to $64$22 million. The increase was due to an increase in general and administrative expenses related to fee-based business.
Net foreign currency gainslosses (gains) result from transactions denominated in a currency other than the operating unit’s functional currency.

32

Table of Contents

Other costs and expenses whichwere $35 million in 2013 compared with $32 million in 2012. Other costs and expenses represent general and administrative expenses that areof the parent company and other expenses not allocated to business segments, increased to $93 million in 2012 from $84 million in 2011.including the cost of certain long-term incentive plans.
Expenses from Wholly-Owned Investees. These expensesExpenses from wholly-owned investees represent costs associated with aviation-related businesses that include cost of goods sold related to aircraft and other sales, labor and equipment costs related to repairs and other services and general and administrative expenses. Expenses from wholly-owned investees were $172increased to $89 million in 2013 from $51 million in 2012 compared to $174 million in 2011primarily due to lower cost of aircraft sold as a result of lower sales volume.an acquisition in January 2013.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $94$31 million in 20122013 compared with $84$29 million in 2011 due to the issuance of2012. The Company issued $350 million of 4.625% senior notes in March 2012.2012 and repaid $200 million of 5.875% senior notes that matured in February 2013. As described below, in May 2013, the Company issued $350 aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Subordinated Debentures due 2053, the proceeds of which will be used in part to redeem the Company's 6.750% Subordinated Debentures due 2045.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate was 26.5%27% in 20122013 compared to 24.8%28% in 2011.2012. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% primarily because of tax-exempt investment income. Tax exempt investment income comprised a lowerslightly higher portion of the 20122013 pre-tax income and as such had a lessermore impact on the effective tax rate for 20122013 compared with 2011.2012.
    
The Company has not provided U.S. deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of approximately $73$104 million of its non-U.S. subsidiaries since these earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested in the non-U.S. subsidiaries. However, in the future, if such earnings were distributed to the Company, taxes of approximately $5.4$9 million, assuming all tax credits are realized, would be payable on such undistributed earnings and would be reflected in the tax provision for the year in which these earnings are no longer intended to be permanently reinvested in the foreign subsidiary.



35

Table of Contents



Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Business Segment Results
Following is a summary of gross and net premiums written, premiums earned, loss ratios (losses and loss expenses incurred expressed as a percentage of premiums earned), expense ratios (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) and GAAP combined ratios (sum of loss ratio and expense ratio) for each of our business segments for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The GAAP combined ratio represents a measure of underwriting profitability, excluding investment income. A GAAP combined ratio in excess of 100 indicates an underwriting loss; a number below 100 indicates an underwriting profit.
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011
Specialty   
Gross premiums written$533,592
 $454,560
Net premiums written452,000
 382,541
Premiums earned420,165
 367,417
Loss ratio62.4% 58.3%
Expense ratio32.1% 32.9%
GAAP combined ratio94.5% 91.2%
Regional   
Gross premiums written$321,659
 $301,542
Net premiums written295,122
 277,177
Premiums earned276,629
 267,142
Loss ratio57.2% 74.2%
Expense ratio35.9% 35.9%
GAAP combined ratio93.1% 110.1%
Alternative Markets   
Gross premiums written$272,327
 $222,423
Net premiums written205,210
 174,744
Premiums earned177,041
 156,820
Loss ratio72.9% 70.9%
Expense ratio24.8% 26.7%
GAAP combined ratio97.7% 97.6%
Reinsurance   
Gross premiums written$132,247
 $118,266
Net premiums written123,098
 113,620
Premiums earned111,599
 103,906
Loss ratio58.1% 61.5%
Expense ratio40.0% 40.9%
GAAP combined ratio98.1% 102.4%
International   
Gross premiums written$234,899
 $209,509
Net premiums written200,457
 178,057
Premiums earned201,099
 160,538
Loss ratio60.8% 60.0%
Expense ratio38.3% 39.1%
GAAP combined ratio99.1% 99.1%
Consolidated   
Gross premiums written$1,494,724
 $1,306,300
Net premiums written1,275,887
 1,126,139
Premiums earned1,186,533
 1,055,823
Loss ratio62.1% 64.8%
Expense ratio33.7% 34.5%
GAAP combined ratio95.8% 99.3%

36

Table of Contents

Net Income to Common Stockholders. The following table presents the Company’s net income to common stockholders and net income per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
 2012 2011
Net income to common stockholders$100,947
 $76,410
Weighted average diluted shares141,637
 144,538
Net income per diluted share$0.71
 $0.53
The Company reported net income of $101 million in 2012 compared to $76 million in 2011. The increase in net income was primarily due to a $27 million increase in after-tax underwriting income. The number of weighted average diluted shares decreased as a result of the Company’s repurchases of its common stock in 2012 and 2011.
Premiums. Gross premiums written were $1,495 million in 2012, an increase of 14% from $1,306 million in 2011. The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to growth in our specialty business and alternative markets segments as a result of expansion into new geographic and product markets. The growth was due to a combination of rate increases and increased exposures. Approximately 78% of policies expiring in 2012 were renewed, compared with a 79% renewal retention rate for policies expiring in 2011. The average rate (i.e., average premium adjusted for change in exposures) for policies that renewed in 2012 increased by approximately 7%. Audit premiums were $22 million in 2012 compared with $12 million in 2011.
From 2005 through 2010, the property casualty insurance market was highly competitive and insurance rates decreased across most business lines. Prices began to increase in 2011, and the rate of increase accelerated in the first nine months of 2012. However, overall loss costs are also generally increasing, and current market price levels for certain lines of business remain below the prices required for the Company to achieve its return objectives. A summary of gross premiums written in 2012 compared with 2011 by line of business within each business segment follows:
Specialty premiums increased 17% to $534 million in 2012 from $455 million in 2011 primarily due to increased business in the energy and environmental markets. Gross premiums increased $19 million (13%) for other liability, $18 million (19%) for property lines, $15 million (20%) for professional liability, $11 million (28%) for commercial automobile, $9 million (25%) for workers compensation and $7 million for other lines.
Regional gross premiums increased 7% to $322 million in 2012 from $302 million in 2011. Gross premiums increased $14 million (13%) for commercial multiple peril, $7 million (13%) for workers’ compensation and $2 million (3%) for commercial automobile. Gross premiums written decreased $3 million (6%) for other lines.
Alternative markets gross premiums increased 22% to $272 million in 2012 from $222 million in 2011. Excluding assigned risk plans, which are fully reinsured, gross premiums increased 15% to $220 million in 2012 from $191 million in 2011. Gross premiums increased $26 million (35%) for primary workers’ compensation and $7 million (17%) for accident and health products. Gross premiums decreased $2 million (6%) for excess workers' compensation and $1 million for other liability lines.
Reinsurance gross premiums increased 12% to $132 million in 2012 from $118 million in 2011. Gross premiums for casualty business were $83 million in 2012 compared to $82 million in 2011. Gross premiums for property business were $49 million, an increase of $13 million (35%) from 2011.
International gross premiums increased 12% to $235 million in 2012 from $210 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in business written by our Lloyd’s operation, our companies in Australia, and new insurance branches in Germany and Norway. Gross premiums increased $8 million (87%) for property reinsurance, $8 million (97%) for other liability, $6 million (14%) for casualty reinsurance, $5 million (26%) for marine, $2 million (5%) for automobile and $2 million (11%) for workers' compensation and decreased $4 million (24%) for fidelity and surety, $1 million (5%) for professional liability and $1 million (2%) for property.
Net premiums written were $1,276 million in 2012, an increase of 13% from $1,126 million in 2011. Ceded reinsurance premiums as a percentage of gross written premiums increased to 15% in 2012 from 14% in 2011. The increase in the percentage of business ceded was due to changes in the reinsurance terms and costs.
Premiums earned increased 12% to $1,187 million in 2012 from $1,056 million in 2011. Insurance premiums (including the impact of rate changes) are generally earned evenly over the policy term, and accordingly we expect to recognize recent rate increases over the upcoming years. Premiums earned in 2012 are related to business written during both 2012 and 2011.

37

Table of Contents

Net Investment Income. Following is a summary of net investment income for the three months ended September 30,2012 and 2011:
 Amount 
Average Annualized
Yield
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011 2012 2011
Fixed maturity securities, including cash and cash equivalents and loans receivable$121,454
 $120,252
 3.8 % 4.0 %
Arbitrage trading account2,397
 (346) 3.0
 (0.4)
Investment funds(13,118) (10,820) (7.6) (7.2)
Equity securities available for sale4,001
 2,795
 4.1
 3.2
Real estate3,097
 2,848
 3.1
 4.9
Gross investment income117,831
 114,729
 3.2 % 3.4 %
Investment expenses(1,812) (666)    
Total$116,019
 $114,063
 3.2 % 3.3 %
Net investment income increased 2% to $116 million in 2012 from $114 million in 2011. The average annualized yield for fixed maturity securities declined from 4.0% to 3.8% due to lower long-term reinvestment yields available in the market. Losses from investment funds in 2012 and 2011 were primarily attributable to energy-related investments. Average invested assets, at cost (including cash and cash equivalents) were $14.7 billion in 2012 and $13.7 billion in 2011.
Insurance Service Fees. The Company is a servicing carrier of worker's compensation assigned risk plans for 20 states and provides insurance program management services to self-insureds, captives, governmental entities, risk retention groups, and insurance companies. Service fees were $26 million in 2012, up from $22 million in 2011, primarily as a result of an increase in fees from residual market premiums.
Net Realized Gains on Investment Sales. The Company buys and sells securities on a regular basis in order to maximize its total return on investments. Decisions to sell securities are based on management’s view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as management’s expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads, currency values and general economic conditions. Net realized gains on investment sales were $17 million in 2012 compared with $21 million in 2011.
Change in Valuation Allowance, Net of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The cost of securities is adjusted where appropriate to include a provision for decline in value which is considered to be other-than-temporary. The change in valuation allowance, net of other-than-temporary impairments, was a decrease of $5 million in 2012 compared with none in 2011.
Revenues from Wholly-Owned Investees. These revenues were derived from aviation-related businesses that provide services to the general aviation market, including fuel and line service, aircraft sales and maintenance, avionics and engineering services and parts fabrication. Revenues from wholly-owned investees increased to $68 million in 2012 from $66 million in 2011.
Losses and Loss Expenses. Losses and loss expenses increased to $737 million in 2012 from $684 million in 2011. The consolidated loss ratio was 62.1% in 2012 and 64.8% in 2011. Catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance recoveries and reinstatement premiums, were $8 million in 2012 compared with $51 million in 2011, a decrease of 4.1 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $28 million in 2012 compared with $56 million in 2011, a difference of 3.0 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development decreased 1.6 points to 63.7% in 2012 from 65.3% in 2011, primarily due to higher earned rate increases. A summary of loss ratios in 2012 compared with 2011 by business segment follows:
Specialty - The loss ratio of 62.4% in 2012 was 4.1 points higher than the loss ratio of 58.3% in 2011. Favorable prior year reserve development was $14 million in 2012 compared with $36 million in 2011, a difference of 6.3 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding prior year reserve development decreased 1.6 points to 64.6% in 2012 from 66.2% in 2011.
Regional - The loss ratio of 57.2% in 2012 was 17.0 points lower than the loss ratio of 74.2% in 2011. Catastrophe losses were $1 million in 2012 compared with $32 million in 2011, an decrease of 11.6 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $5 million in 2012 compared with $10 million in 2011, a difference of 2.1 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development decreased 7.5 points to 58.6% in 2012 from 66.1% in 2011 due to favorable pricing and milder loss activity.

38

Table of Contents

Alternative Markets - The loss ratio of 72.9% in 2012 was 2.0 points higher than the loss ratio of 70.9% in 2011. Favorable prior year reserve development was $3 million in 2012 compared with unfavorable development of $5 million in 2011, a difference of 1.8 loss ratio points. The loss ratio excluding prior year reserve development increased 0.8 points to 74.3% in 2012 from 73.5% in 2011.
Reinsurance - The loss ratio of 58.1% in 2012 was 3.4 points lower than the loss ratio of 61.5% in 2011. There were no catastrophe losses in 2012 compared to $6 million in 2011, a decrease of 5.8 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $5 million in 2012 compared with $4 million in 2011. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development increased 2.7 points to 62.2% in 2012 from 59.5% in 2011.
International - The loss ratio of 60.8% in 2012 was 0.8 points higher than the loss ratio of 60.0% in 2011. There were $2 million in catastrophe losses in 2012 compared with $5 million in 2011, a decrease of 2.1 loss ratio points. Favorable prior year reserve development was $1 million in 2012 and in 2011. The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development increased 3.2 points to 60.4% in 2012 from 57.2% in 2011.
Other Operating Costs and Expenses. Following is a summary of other operating costs and expenses for 2012 and 2011:
(Dollars in thousands)2012 2011
Underwriting expenses$399,677
 $363,889
Service expenses22,769
 18,873
Net foreign currency gains(1,575) (2,700)
Other costs and expenses30,616
 27,087
Total$451,487
 $407,149
Underwriting expenses are comprised of commissions paid to agents and brokers, premium taxes and other assessments and internal underwriting costs. Underwriting expenses increased 10% compared to an increase in net written premiums of 13%. The expense ratio (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) was 33.7% in 2012 and 34.5% in 2011.
Service expenses, which represent the costs associated with the fee-based businesses, increased 21% to $23 million. The increase was due to an increase in general and administrative expenses related to fee-based business.
Net foreign currency gains result from transactions denominated in a currency other than the operating unit’s functional currency.
Other costs and expenses, which represent general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to business segments, increased to $31 million in 2012 from $27 million in 2011.
Expenses from Wholly-Owned Investees. These expenses represent costs associated with aviation-related businesses that include cost of goods sold related to aircraft and other sales, labor and equipment costs related to repairs and other services and general and administrative expenses. Expenses from wholly-owned investees were $66 million in 2012 compared to $64 million in 2011.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $33 million in 2012 compared with $28 million in 2011 due to the issuance of $350 million of 4.625% senior notes in March 2012.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate was 24.4% in 2012 compared to 20.6% in 2011. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% primarily because of tax-exempt investment income. Tax exempt investment income comprised a lower portion of the 2012 pre-tax income and as such had a lesser impact on the effective tax rate for 2012 compared with 2011.





3933

Table of Contents

Investments
As part of its investment strategy, the Company establishes a level of cash and highly liquid short-term and intermediate-term securities that, combined with expected cash flow, it believes is adequate to meet its payment obligations.
The Company also attempts to maintain an appropriate relationship between the average duration of the investment portfolio and the approximate duration of its liabilities (i.e., policy claims and debt obligations). The average duration of the fixed maturity portfolio was 3.3 years at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 3.63.4 years at December 31, 20112012. The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio and investment-related assets as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 were as follows:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying
Value
 
Percent
of Total
Carrying
Value
 
Percent
of Total
Fixed maturity securities:      
U.S. government and government agencies$937,313
 6.6%$875,712
 6.0%
State and municipal:      
Special revenue2,198,657
 15.4%2,018,194
 13.8%
Pre-refunded (1)995,605
 7.0%853,418
 5.8%
State general obligation890,990
 6.2%859,481
 5.9%
Local general obligation391,181
 2.8%374,158
 2.6%
Corporate backed430,658
 3.0%370,490
 2.5%
Total state and municipal4,907,091
 34.4%4,475,741
 30.6%
Mortgage-backed securities:      
Agency1,145,102
 8.0%1,057,039
 7.2%
Residential-Prime245,739
 1.7%209,938
 1.4%
Residential-Alt A154,538
 1.1%99,751
 0.7%
Commercial158,008
 1.1%209,366
 1.4%
Total mortgage-backed securities1,703,387
 11.9%1,576,094
 10.8%
Corporate:      
Industrial1,620,807
 11.3%1,548,214
 10.6%
Financial725,550
 5.1%859,566
 5.9%
Asset-backed578,357
 4.1%822,825
 5.6%
Utilities219,452
 1.5%219,618
 1.5%
Other109,983
 0.8%125,853
 0.9%
Total corporate3,254,149
 22.8%3,576,076
 24.5%
Foreign government and foreign government agencies1,090,472
 7.6%1,161,494
 8.0%
Total fixed maturity securities11,892,412
 83.3%11,665,117
 79.9%
Equity securities available for sale:   
Equity securities   
Common stocks324,881
 2.3%295,031
 2.0%
Preferred stocks100,441
 0.7%104,355
 0.7%
Total equity securities available for sale425,322
 3.0%
Total equity securities399,386
 2.7%
      
Investment funds747,638
 5.2%793,603
 5.4%
Real estate433,686
 3.0%588,777
 4.0%
Arbitrage trading account417,446
 2.9%701,223
 4.8%
Loans receivable371,408
 2.6%456,533
 3.1%
Total investments$14,287,912
 100.0%$14,604,639
 100.0%
 

______________    
(1)Pre-refunded securities are securities for which an escrow account has been established to fund the remaining payments of principal and interest through maturity. Such escrow accounts are funded almost exclusively with U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities.


4034

Table of Contents


Fixed Maturity Securities. The Company’s investment policy with respect to fixed maturity securities is generally to purchase instruments with the expectation of holding them to their maturity. However, management of the available for sale portfolio is considered necessary to maintain an approximate matching of assets and liabilities as well as to adjust the portfolio as a result of changes in financial market conditions and tax considerations.
The Company’s philosophy related to holding or selling fixed maturity securities is based on its objective of maximizing total return. The key factors that management considers in its investment decisions as to whether to hold or sell fixed maturity securities are its view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as its expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads and currency values. In a period in which management expects interest rates to rise, the Company may sell longer duration securities in order to mitigate the impact of an interest rate rise on the fair value of the portfolio. Similarly, in a period in which management expects credit spreads to widen, the Company may sell lower quality securities, and in a period in which management expects certain foreign currencies to decline in value, the Company may sell securities denominated in those foreign currencies. The sale of fixed maturity securities in order to achieve the objective of maximizing total return may result in realized gains; however, there is no reason to expect these gains to continue in future periods.
At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, investments in foreign fixed maturity securities were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)GovernmentCorporateTotalGovernmentCorporateTotal
Australia$204,583
$113,990
$318,573
$243,737
$139,062
$382,799
Canada136,247
49,419
185,666
United Kingdom139,804
33,693
173,497
111,644
58,200
169,844
Canada121,137
51,321
172,458
Argentina124,833
24,559
149,392
133,466
29,511
162,977
Germany94,056
27,461
121,517
72,055

72,055
Norway64,936
 64,936
Brazil46,650

46,650
49,550

49,550
Norway38,092
 38,092
Supranational (1)36,950

36,950
38,672

38,672
Netherlands 11,511
11,511

13,057
13,057
Switzerland
11,231
11,231

11,279
11,279
Singapore6,990

6,990
6,840

6,840
Uruguay3,187

3,187
3,400

3,400
New Zealand424

424
419

419
Total$816,706
$273,766
$1,090,472
$860,966
$300,528
$1,161,494
_______________
(1) Supranational represents investments in the North American Development Bank, European Investment Bank and Inter-American Development Bank.
Equity Securities Available for Sale. Equity securities available for sale primarily represent investments in high-dividend yielding common and preferred stocks issued by large market capitalization companies.
Investment Funds. At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the carrying value of investment funds was $748$794 million, including investments in real estate funds of $382$379 million and investments in energy funds of $129$147 million.
Real Estate. Real estate is directly owned property held for investment. At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, real estate consists of an office building in operation, three office buildings in London, including two in operation and one under development and a long-term ground lease in Washington D. C.lease.
Arbitrage Trading Account. The arbitrage trading account is comprised of direct investments in arbitrage securities. Merger arbitrage is the business of investing in the securities of publicly held companies that are the targets in announced tender offers and mergers.
Loans Receivable. Loans receivable, which are carried at amortized cost, have an aggregate cost of $371$457 million and an aggregate fair value of $364$463 million at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013. Amortized cost of these loans is net of a valuation allowance of $6 million as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013. The fivesix largest loans have an aggregate amortized cost of $217$243 million and an aggregate fair value of $212$250 million as of such date and are secured by commercial real estate. These loans earn interest at floating LIBOR-based interest rates and have maturities (inclusive of extension options) through August 2025. The loans are secured by office buildings (72%) and hotels (28%)commercial real estate located primarily in New York City, California, Hawaii and Boston.Chicago.

4135

Table of Contents

Market Risk. The fair value of the Company’s investments is subject to risks of fluctuations in credit quality and interest rates. The Company uses various models and stress test scenarios to monitor and manage interest rate risk. The Company attempts to manage its interest rate risk by maintaining an appropriate relationship between the average duration of the investment portfolio and the approximate duration of its liabilities (i.e., policy claims and debt obligations). The average duration for the fixed maturity portfolio was 3.3 years at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 3.63.4 years at December 31, 20112012. In addition, the fair value of the Company’s international investments is subject to currency risk. The Company attempts to manage its currency risk by matching its foreign currency assets and liabilities where considered appropriate.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
        Cash Flow. Cash flow provided from operating activities decreasedincreased to $453$115 million in 2013 from $74 million in 2012 from $485 million in 2011. The decrease in cash flow was due primarily to an increase in income taxescash flow from underwriting activities, partially offset by higher tax payments. The increase in cash flow from underwriting activities primarily reflects a reduction in the paid in 2012. Paidloss ratio (paid losses as a percent of earned premiums were 58.4%premiums) to 54% in 2013 from 59% in 2012 compared with 60.1% in 2011.

As a holding company, the Company derives cash from its subsidiaries in the form of dividends, tax payments and management fees. Maximum amounts of dividends that can be paid without regulatory approval are prescribed by statute. During 2012, the maximum amount of dividends which can be paid without regulatory approval is approximately $417 million. The ability of the holding company to service its debt obligations is limited by the ability of its insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends. In the event dividends, tax payments and management fees available to the holding company were inadequate to service its debt obligations, the Company would need to raise capital, sell assets or restructure its debt obligations.

The Company's insurance subsidiaries' principal sources of cash are premiums, investment income, service fees and proceeds from sales and maturities of portfolio investments. The principal uses of cash are payments for claims, taxes, operating expenses and dividends. The Company expects its insurance subsidiaries to fund the payment of losses with cash received from premiums, investment income and fees. The Company targets an average duration for its investment portfolio that is within one year of the average duration of its liabilities so that portions of its investment portfolio mature throughout the claim cycle and are available for the payment of claims if necessary. In the event operating cash flow and proceeds from maturities and prepayments of fixed income securities are not sufficient to fund claim payments and other cash requirements, the remainder of the Company's cash and investments is available to pay claims and other obligations as they become due. The Company's investment portfolio is highly liquid, with approximately 85%81% invested in cash, cash equivalents and marketable fixed maturity securities as of September 30, 2012March 31, 2013. If the sale of fixed maturity securities were to become necessary, a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the cost and sales price of securities sold would be recognized.
Debt. At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, the Company had senior notes, junior subordinated debentures and other debt outstanding with a carrying value of $2,121$1,937 million and a face amount of $2,141$1,956 million. The maturities of the outstanding debt are $14 million in 2012, $200$4 million in 2013, $47$33 million in 2014, $200$238 million in 2015, $2$4 million in 2016, $450 million in 2019, $300 million in 2020, $427$426 million in 2022, $1 million in 2023, $250 million in 2037 and $250 million in 2045.
In March 2012, the Company issued $350 million of 4.625% senior notes due 2022. In February 2013, the Company repaid $200 million of 5.875% senior notes at maturity. In May 2013, the Company issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Subordinated Debentures due 2053. Net proceeds from this offering will be used to pay $250 million principal amount of the Company's 6.750% Subordinated Debentures on May 26, 2013, which were called for redemption on April 26, 2013; the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes.
Equity. At September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, total common stockholders’ equity was $4.3$4.4 billion, common shares outstanding were approximately 136 million136,028,287 and stockholders’ equity per outstanding share was $31.81.
As further described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company adopted FASB guidance regarding deferred acquisition costs effective January 1, 2012. The impact of adopting this guidance was a reduction in common stockholders' equity of $55 million as of January 1, 2012.$32.19.
Total Capital. Total capitalization (equity, senior notes and other debt and junior subordinated debentures) was $6.4$6.3 billion at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013. The percentage of the Company’s capital attributable to senior notes,debt and junior subordinated debentures and other debt was 33%31% at September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and 31%33% at December 31, 20112012.

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Reference is made to the information under “Investments - Market Risk” under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-Q.

Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
          Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company has in place effective controls

42

Table of Contents

and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

36

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company’s subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and arbitration, arising in the ordinary course of their insurance and reinsurance businesses. The Company’s estimates of the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its aggregate reserves for losses and loss expenses, and the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112012.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Set forth below is a summary of theNo shares were repurchased by the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2012March 31, 2013 and the. The maximum number of shares remaining authorized for purchase bythat may be repurchased under the Company.Company's outstanding repurchase plan is 9,068,093.
 
Total number
of shares
purchased
 
Average price
paid per share
 
Total number of shares purchased
as part of publicly announced
plans
or programs
 
Maximum number of
shares that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs (1)
July 2012615,184
 $36.95
 615,184
 8,097,613
  
August 20121,243,583
 37.08
 1,243,583
 9,350,298
  
September 2012111,905
 $36.98
 111,905
 9,238,393
  
(1) The Company's repurchase authorization was increased to 10,000,000 shares on August 7, 2012.

Item 6. Exhibits

Number   
(10.1)Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the W. R. Berkley Corporation 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
(31.1) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a).
   
(31.2) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a).
   
(32.1) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

4337

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
  
W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION
 
Date:November 8, 2012May 6, 2013/s/ William R. Berkley  
  William R. Berkley 
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 
   
Date:November 8, 2012May 6, 2013/s/ Eugene G. Ballard  
  Eugene G. Ballard 
  Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer 

4438