UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 
__________________________
FORM 10-Q
__________________________
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 1,December 21, 2016
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Transition Period From to  
Commission file number: 001-08308 
__________________________
Luby's, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
__________________________
Delaware74-1335253
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
    
13111 Northwest Freeway, Suite 600
Houston, Texas
77040
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
 
(713) 329-6800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No   ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x   No  ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
 
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filerx
Non-accelerated filer☐  Smaller reporting company
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  x
 
As of July 6, 2016January 26, 2017, there were 28,940,04129,043,855 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding. 



Luby’s, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016
Table of Contents
 
 Page
  
  
  
    
    
    
  
  
  
  
  
  



Additional Information
 
We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer, and the SEC maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains the reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically. Our website address is http://www.lubysinc.com. Please note that our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on our website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference unless such information is specifically referenced elsewhere in this report. 




Part I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item1.Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Luby’s, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
 
June 1,
2016
 August 26,
2015
December 21,
2016
 August 31,
2016
(Unaudited)  (Unaudited)  
ASSETS      
Current Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$1,409
 $1,501
$1,413
 $1,339
Trade accounts and other receivables, net6,142
 5,175
5,665
 5,919
Food and supply inventories4,495
 4,483
5,036
 4,596
Prepaid expenses3,911
 3,402
3,264
 3,147
Assets related to discontinued operations1
 10

 1
Deferred income taxes581
 577
419
 540
Total current assets16,539
 15,148
15,797
 15,542
Property held for sale4,238
 4,536
5,235
 5,522
Assets related to discontinued operations3,667
 3,671
3,122
 3,192
Property and equipment, net196,008
 200,202
191,957
 193,218
Intangible assets, net21,367
 22,570
20,630
 21,074
Goodwill1,605
 1,643
1,605
 1,605
Deferred income taxes14,896
 12,917
10,396
 8,738
Other assets3,452
 3,571
3,506
 3,334
Total assets$261,772
 $264,258
$252,248
 $252,225
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current Liabilities:      
Accounts payable$19,677
 $20,173
$16,883
 $17,539
Liabilities related to discontinued operations411
 408
384
 412
Current portion of credit facility debt2,450
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities24,704
 23,967
27,450
 23,752
Total current liabilities44,792
 44,548
47,167
 41,703
Credit facility debt36,000
 37,500
Credit facility debt, less current portion36,622
 37,000
Liabilities related to discontinued operations17
 182
16
 17
Other liabilities7,631
 7,369
7,843
 7,752
Total liabilities88,440
 89,599
91,648
 86,472
Commitments and Contingencies
 

 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued were 29,420,690 and 29,134,603, respectively; shares outstanding were 28,920,690 and 28,634,603, respectively9,414
 9,323
Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued were 29,461,030 and 29,325,754, respectively; shares outstanding were 28,961,030 and 28,825,754, respectively9,428
 9,421
Paid-in capital30,133
 29,006
30,774
 30,348
Retained earnings138,560
 141,105
125,173
 130,759
Less cost of treasury stock, 500,000 shares(4,775) (4,775)(4,775) (4,775)
Total shareholders’ equity173,332
 174,659
160,600
 165,753
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$261,772
 $264,258
$252,248
 $252,225
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


Luby’s, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
Quarter Ended Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
SALES:          
Restaurant sales$86,476
 $88,788
 $286,336
 $254,832
$108,082
 $113,546
Culinary contract services3,892
 3,624
 12,726
 11,993
4,297
 4,915
Franchise revenue1,586
 1,578
 5,411
 4,764
1,871
 2,125
Vending revenue143
 112
 437
 355
159
 158
TOTAL SALES92,097
 94,102
 304,910
 271,944
114,409
 120,744
COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
Cost of food24,221
 25,218
 81,256
 74,171
30,850
 32,434
Payroll and related costs30,748
 29,971
 100,007
 88,177
38,673
 39,424
Other operating expenses13,572
 14,276
 45,728
 42,688
19,648
 18,421
Occupancy costs5,065
 4,826
 17,242
 14,797
6,475
 6,642
Opening costs117
 427
 688
 2,022
165
 397
Cost of culinary contract services3,534
 3,232
 11,476
 10,809
3,811
 4,422
Cost of franchise operations441
 410
 1,480
 1,147
580
 612
Depreciation and amortization5,304
 4,759
 17,538
 14,608
6,550
 7,014
Selling, general and administrative expenses9,227
 8,139
 32,312
 26,671
13,759
 13,243
Provision for asset impairments172
 
 209
 218
287
 
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment42
 (609) (793) (1,696)85
 (279)
Total costs and expenses92,443
 90,649
 307,143
 273,612
120,883
 122,330
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS(346) 3,453
 (2,233) (1,668)
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS(6,474) (1,586)
Interest income
 1
 3
 3
1
 1
Interest expense(482) (599) (1,674) (1,624)(602) (696)
Other income (expense), net88
 24
 (2) 282
103
 (118)
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations(740) 2,879
 (3,906) (3,007)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(593) 395
 (1,438) (1,326)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(147) 2,484
 (2,468) (1,681)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes13
 (131) (77) (344)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$(134) $2,353
 $(2,545) $(2,025)
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:       
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations(6,972) (2,399)
Benefit for income taxes(1,458) (660)
Loss from continuing operations(5,514) (1,739)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(72) (72)
NET LOSS$(5,586) $(1,811)
Loss per share from continuing operations:   
Basic$(0.01) $0.09
 $(0.09) $(0.06)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Assuming dilution$(0.01) $0.09
 $(0.09) $(0.06)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:       
Loss per share from discontinued operations:   
Basic$0.00
 $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.01)$(0.00) $(0.00)
Assuming dilution$0.00
 $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.01)$(0.00) $(0.00)
Net income (loss) per share:       
Net loss per share:   
Basic$(0.01) $0.08
 $(0.09) $(0.07)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Assuming dilution$(0.01) $0.08
 $(0.09) $(0.07)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Weighted average shares outstanding:          
Basic29,259
 29,009
 29,207
 28,940
29,339
 29,133
Assuming dilution29,259
 29,111
 29,207
 28,940
29,339
 29,133
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


Luby’s, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 Common Stock     Total
 Issued Treasury Paid-In Retained Shareholders’
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Equity
Balance at August 26, 201529,135
 $9,323
 (500) $(4,775) $29,006
 $141,105
 $174,659
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (2,545) (2,545)
Share-based compensation expense50
 16
 
 
 1,127
 
 1,143
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans176
 56
 
 
 19
 
 75
Common stock issued under nonemployee benefit plans60
 19
 
 
 (19)
 
 
Balance at June 1, 201629,421
 $9,414
 (500) $(4,775) $30,133
 $138,560
 $173,332
 Common Stock     Total
 Issued Treasury Paid-In Retained Shareholders’
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Equity
Balance at August 31, 201629,440
 $9,421
 (500) $(4,775) $30,348
 $130,759
 $165,753
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (5,586) (5,586)
Share-based compensation expense21
 7
 
 
 426
 
 433
Balance at December 21, 201629,461
 $9,428
 (500) $(4,775) $30,774
 $125,173
 $160,600
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. 


Luby’s, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss$(2,545) $(2,025)$(5,586) $(1,811)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Net gain on disposition of property and equipment(609) (1,386)
Provision for asset impairments and net (gains) on property sales372
 (279)
Depreciation and amortization17,555
 14,624
6,550
 7,021
Amortization of debt issuance cost255
 127
67
 148
Share-based compensation expense1,143
 1,102
433
 520
Deferred tax benefit(1,983) (1,978)(1,466) (927)
Cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities13,816
 10,464
370
 4,672
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Increase in trade accounts and other receivables(967) (108)
Decrease (Increase) in food and supply inventories(516) 1,135
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets(614) 41
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(311) (7,371)
Decrease in trade accounts and other receivables254
 226
Increase in food and supply inventories(440) (968)
Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets(59) 364
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities3,116
 2,049
Net cash provided by operating activities11,408
 4,161
3,241
 6,343
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:      
Proceeds from disposal of assets and property held for sale4,308
 5,142
38
 1,916
Decrease in notes receivable17
 50

 17
Purchases of property and equipment(14,358) (16,429)(4,980) (5,729)
Net cash used in investing activities(10,033) (11,237)(4,942) (3,796)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:      
Credit facility borrowings77,900
 80,100
45,700
 27,000
Credit facility repayments(79,400) (74,100)(78,300) (29,500)
Proceeds from term loan35,000
 
Debt issuance costs(42) (253)(625) (42)
Proceeds received on the exercise of employee stock options75
 115

 75
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,467) 5,862
1,775
 (2,467)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(92) (1,214)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents74
 80
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,501
 2,788
1,339
 1,501
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,409
 $1,574
$1,413
 $1,581
Cash paid for:      
Income taxes$
 $
$
 $
Interest1,368
 1,505
478
 520
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


Luby’s, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 
 
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Luby’s, Inc. (the “Company” or “Luby’s”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements that are prepared for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2016.30, 2017.
 
The Consolidated Balance Sheet dated August 26, 2015,31, 2016, included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”), has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of that date. However, this Form 10-Q does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for an annual filing of completeaudited, year-end financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2015.31, 2016.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This update requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. Debt issuance costs related to the Company's new 2016 Credit Agreement (defined hereafter) amounted to $0.6 million. The portion of the debt issuance costs associated with the Term Loan (defined hereafter) are setup as a direct deduction from the long-term debt liability. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis in this Form-10Q for more discussion on debt issuance cost.
New Accounting Pronouncements - "to be Adopted"
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update provides a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early application is not permitted. This update permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Further, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the guidance in ASU No. 2014–09 for evaluating when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies the guidance in ASU No. 2014–09 regarding assessing whether promises to transfer goods or services are distinct, and whether an entity's promise to grant a license provides a customer with a right to use or right to access the entity's intellectual property. The Company plans to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which is the first fiscal quarter of the annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017. We have not yet decided on a method of transition upon adoption. The Company expects the pronouncement may impact the recognition of the initial franchise fee, which is currently recognized upon the opening of a franchise restaurant. We are further evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No 2014-15. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The


pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, after December 31, 2016. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). This update requires inventory within the scope of the standard to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Topic 740). This update requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a corresponding right-of-use asset. The update also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. This standard requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with optional practical expedients. Based on a preliminary assessment, the Company expects that most of its operating lease commitments will be subject to the new guidance and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right–of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in a significant increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company is continuing its assessment, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). This update was issued as part of the FASB’s simplification initiative and affects all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The amendments in this update cover such areas as the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies, the classification of those excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, an accounting policy election for forfeitures, the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes and still qualify for equity classification and the classification of those taxes paid on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and have not yet selected a transition method.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–04, “Liabilities – Extinguishment of Liabilities: Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored–Value Products,” which is intended to eliminate current and future diversity in practice related to derecognition of prepaid stored–value product liability in a way that aligns with the new revenue recognition guidance. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017; however, early application is permitted. We are are evaluating the impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This update provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payment are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
On February 2, 2017, the Company and its lenders entered into a First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the 2016 Credit Agreement dated. The Amendment clarified the definition of Growth Capital Expenditures. We were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the 2016 Credit Agreement as of the balance sheet dated December 21, 2016 and as of the Form 10–Q filing date. Management has assessed the likelihood of an event of default within the next twelve months and determined that it is possible but not probable that certain leverage and fixed charge ratios will exceed the maximum permitted under our 2016 Credit Agreement.


Note 2. Accounting Periods
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. Accordingly, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, or accounting periods, accounting for 364 days in the aggregate. However, every fifth or sixth year, we have a fiscal year that consists of 53 weeks, accounting for 371 days in the aggregate; fiscal year 2016 will bewas such a year. Each of theThe first three quarters of each fiscal year, prior to fiscal year 2016, consisted of three four-week periods, while the fourth quarter normally consistedconsists of four four-week periods.
Beginning in fiscal 2016, we changed our fiscal quarter ending dates with the first fiscal quarter end extended by one accounting period and the fiscal fourth quarter being reduced by one accounting period. The purpose of this change is in part to minimize the Thanksgiving calendar shift by extending the first fiscal quarter until after Thanksgiving. With this change in fiscal quarter ending dates, our first quarter isperiods, or 16 weeks, and the remaining three quarters will typically beincludes three four-week periods, or 12 weeks, in length. The fourth fiscal quarter will beincludes 13 weeks in certain fiscal years to adjust for our standard 52 week, or 364 day, fiscal year compared to the 365 day calendar year. Fiscal 2016 is such a year where the fourth quarter will have 13 weeks, resulting in a 53 week fiscal year. Comparability between quarters may be affected by varying lengths of the quarters, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business. 

Note 3. Reportable Segments
 
The Company has three reportable segments: Company-owned restaurants, Culinary Contract Services (“CCS”), and Franchise Operations.
 
Company-owned restaurants
 
Company-owned restaurants consists of several brands which are aggregated into one reportable segment because the nature of the products and services, the production processes, the customers, the methods used to distribute the products and services, the nature of the regulatory environment, and store level profit margin are similar. The chief operating decision maker analyzes Company-owned restaurants at store level profit which is revenue less cost of food, payroll and related costs, other operating expenses, and occupancy costs. The primary brands are Luby’s Cafeterias, Fuddruckers, and Cheeseburger in Paradise, with a non-core restaurant location operating under the brand name Bob Luby’s Seafood Grill. All company-owned restaurants are casual dining restaurants. Each restaurant is an operating segment because operating results and cash flow can be determined for each restaurant.
 
The total number of Company-owned restaurants was 178173 at June 1,December 21, 2016 and 177175 at August 26, 2015.


31, 2016.

Culinary Contract Services
 
CCS, branded as Luby’s Culinary Contract Services, consists of a business line servicing healthcare, higher education and corporate dining clients.clients, and, as of December 2016, retail grocery. The healthcare accounts are full service and typically include in-room delivery, catering, vending, coffee service, and retail dining. CCS has contracts with long-term acute care hospitals, acute care medical centers, ambulatory surgical centers, behavioral hospitals, and business and industry clients. CCS has the unique ability to deliver quality services that include facility design and procurement as well as nutrition and branded food services to our clients. The cost of Culinary Contract Services on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include all food, payroll and related costs, and other operating expenses related to CCS sales.

The total number of CCS contractslocations was 2623 at June 1,December 21, 2016 and 2324 at August 26, 2015.  31, 2016.

In December 2016, CCS began selling Luby's Famous Macaroni & Cheese in the freezer section of H-E-B Grocery Stores, a Texas-born retail grocery store chain. H-E-B stores now stock the family-sized versions (approximately five servings) of Luby's classic cheese and jalapeño cheddar macaroni and cheese varieties.
 
Franchise Operations
 
We only offer franchises for only the Fuddruckers brand. Franchises are sold in markets where expansion is deemed advantageous to the development of the Fuddruckers concept and system of restaurants. Initial franchise agreements have a term of 20 years. Franchise agreements typically grant franchisees an exclusive territorial license to operate a single restaurant within a specified area, usually a four-mile radius surrounding the franchised restaurant.
 
Franchisees bear all direct costs involved in the development, construction, and operation of their restaurants. In exchange for a franchise fee, the Company provides franchise assistance in the following areas: site selection, prototypical architectural plans, interior and exterior design and layout, training, marketing and sales techniques, assistance by a Fuddruckers “opening team” at the time a franchised restaurant opens, and operations, and accounting guidelines set forth in various policies and procedures manuals.
 
All franchisees are required to operate their restaurants in accordance with Fuddruckers’ standards and specifications, including controls over menu items, food quality, and preparation. The Company requires the successful completion of its training program by a minimum of three managers for each franchised restaurant. In addition, franchised restaurants are evaluated


regularly by the Company for compliance with franchise agreements, including standards and specifications through the use of periodic, unannounced, on-site inspections, and standard evaluation reports.
 
The number of franchised restaurants was 114113 at June 1,December 21, 2016 and 106113 at August 26, 2015.31, 2016.  
 
Licensee
 
In November 1997, a prior owner of the Fuddruckers – World’s Greatest Hamburgers ® brand granted to a licensee the exclusive right to use the Fuddruckers proprietary marks, trade dress and system to develop Fuddruckers restaurants in a territory consisting of certain countries in Africa, the Middle East and parts of Asia. As of July 2016,January 2017, this licensee operated 3534 restaurants that are licensed to use the Fuddruckers Proprietary Marks in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Jordan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Morocco, and Malaysia. The Company does not receive revenue or royalties from these restaurants.

The table on the following page shows segment financial information. The table also lists total assets for each reportable segment. Corporate assets include cash and cash equivalents, property and equipment, assets related to discontinued operations, property held for sale, deferred tax assets, and prepaid expenses.


 Quarter Ended Three Quarters Ended
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (40 weeks) (36 weeks)
 (In thousands)
Sales:       
Company-owned restaurants (1)
$86,619
 $88,900
 $286,773
 $255,187
Culinary contract services3,892
 3,624
 12,726
 11,993
Franchise operations1,586
 1,578
 5,411
 4,764
Total$92,097
 $94,102
 $304,910
 $271,944
Segment level profit:    
 
Company-owned restaurants$13,013
 $14,609
 $42,540
 $35,354
Culinary contract services358
 392
 1,250
 1,184
Franchise operations1,145
 1,168
 3,931
 3,617
Total$14,516
 $16,169
 $47,721
 $40,155
Depreciation and amortization:    
 
Company-owned restaurants$4,386
 $4,047
 $14,512
 $12,538
Culinary contract services19
 28
 83
 127
Franchise operations192
 177
 641
 531
Corporate707
 507
 2,302
 1,412
Total$5,304
 $4,759
 $17,538
 $14,608
Capital expenditures:    
 
Company-owned restaurants$3,217
 $5,023
 $13,839
 $15,368
Culinary contract services
 
 
 
Franchise operations
 
 
 
Corporate171
 418
 519
 1,061
Total$3,388
 $5,441
 $14,358
 $16,429
     
 
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations:    
 
Segment level profit$14,516
 $16,169
 $47,721
 $40,155
Opening costs(117) (427) (688) (2,022)
Depreciation and amortization(5,304) (4,759) (17,538) (14,608)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(9,227) (8,139) (32,312) (26,671)
Provision for asset impairments(172) 
 (209) (218)
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment(42) 609
 793
 1,696
Interest income
 1
 3
 3
Interest expense(482) (599) (1,674) (1,624)
Other income (expense), net88
 24
 (2) 282
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations$(740) $2,879
 $(3,906) $(3,007)
 
June 1,
2016
 August 26,
2015
Quarter Ended
Total assets:   
Company-owned restaurants(2)
$213,995
 $218,492
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands)
Sales:   
Company-owned restaurants (1)
$108,241
 $113,704
Culinary contract services3,560
 1,644
4,297
 4,915
Franchise operations(3)
12,538
 13,034
Franchise operations1,871
 2,125
Total$114,409
 $120,744
Segment level profit:   
Company-owned restaurants$12,595
 $16,783
Culinary contract services486
 493
Franchise operations1,291
 1,513
Total$14,372
 $18,789
Depreciation and amortization:   
Company-owned restaurants$5,454
 $5,809
Culinary contract services22
 37
Franchise operations237
 256
Corporate31,679
 31,088
837
 912
Total$261,772
 $264,258
$6,550
 $7,014
Capital expenditures:   
Company-owned restaurants$4,550
 $5,494
Culinary contract services
 
Franchise operations
 
Corporate430
 235
Total$4,980
 $5,729
   
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations:   
Segment level profit$14,372
 $18,789
Opening costs(165) (397)
Depreciation and amortization(6,550) (7,014)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(13,759) (13,243)
Provision for asset impairments(287) 
Net (loss) gain on disposition of property and equipment(85) 279
Interest income1
 1
Interest expense(602) (696)
Other income (expense), net103
 (118)
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations$(6,972) $(2,399)
 
 December 21,
2016
 August 31,
2016
Total assets:   
Company-owned restaurants(2)
$208,582
 $211,182
Culinary contract services3,092
 3,390
Franchise operations(3)
11,860
 12,266
Corporate28,714
 25,387
Total$252,248
 $252,225

(1)Includes vending revenue of $143$159 thousand and $112$158 thousand for the quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6, 2015, respectively, and $437 and $355 thousand for the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015, respectively.
(2)Company-owned restaurants segment includes $10.0$9.6 million of Fuddruckers trade name, Cheeseburger in Paradise liquor licenses, and Jimmy Buffett intangibles.
(3)Franchise operations segment includes approximately $11.7$11.2 million in royalty intangibles.


Note 4. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into derivative instruments, from time to time, to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates on a percentage of its long-term variable rate debt. On December 14, 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap, pay fixed - receive floating, with a constant notional amount of $17.5 million. The fixed swap rate we pay is 1.965%, plus an applicable margin. The variable rate we receive is one-month LIBOR, plus an applicable margin. The term of the interest rate swap is 5 years. The Company does not apply hedge accounting treatment to this derivative, therefore, changes in fair value of the instrument are recognized in Other income (expense), net.

The Company does not hold or use derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Note 4.5. Fair Value Measurements
 
GAAP establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.liabilities, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value measurements guidance applies whenever other statements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
 
GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include:

Level 1: Defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Defined as pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures.

Level 3: Defined as pricing inputs that are unobservable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
 
 Recurring fair value measurements related to liabilities are presented below:
   Fair Value
Measurement Using
  
 Quarter Ended December 21, 2016 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Valuation Method
Recurring Fair Value - Liabilities  (In thousands)    
Continuing Operations:         
TSR Performance Based Incentive Plan(1)
$1,129
 $
 $1,129
 $
 Monte Carlo Simulation
Derivative - Interest Rate Swap91
 
 91
 
 Discounted Cash Flow
Total liabilities at Fair Value$1,220
 $
 $1,220
 $
  
(1) The fair value of the Company's 2015, 2016, and 2017 Performance Based Incentive Plan liabilities were approximately $491 thousand, $526 thousand, and $112 thousand, respectively. See Note 11 to the Company's consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q for further discussion of Performance Based Incentive Plan.



   Fair Value
Measurement Using
  
 Quarter Ended December 16, 2015 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Valuation Method
Recurring Fair Value - Liabilities  (In thousands)    
Continuing Operations:         
TSR Performance Based Incentive Plan$182
 $
 $182
 $
 Monte Carlo Simulation

Non-recurring fair value measurements related to impaired property and equipment consisted of the following:
 
   
Fair Value
Measurement Using
  
 Three Quarters Ended June 1, 2016 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Impairments
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements  (In thousands)    
Continuing Operations         
Property and equipment related to company-owned restaurants$
 $
 $
 $
 $
Goodwill (1)
1,605
 
 
 1,605
 (38)
Total Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements$1,605
 $
 $
 $1,605
 $(38)
Discontinued Operations         
Property and equipment related to company-owned restaurants$
 $
 $
 $
 $
   
Fair Value
Measurement Using
  
 Quarter Ended December 21, 2016 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Impairments
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements  (In thousands)    
Continuing Operations         
Property held for sale(1)
$3,330
 $
 $
 $3,330
 $(287)

(1)    In accordance with Subtopic 360-20, goodwill with a carrying amount of approximately $1.6 million was written down to its implied fair value of approximately $1.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $38 thousand, in the quarter ended March 9, 2016.




   
Fair Value
Measurement Using
  
 Three Quarters Ended May 6, 2015 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Impairments
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements  (In thousands)    
Continuing Operations         
Property and equipment related to company-owned restaurants (1)
$1,323
 $
 $
 $1,323
 $(180)
Goodwill (2)
1,643
 
 
 1,643
 (38)
Total Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements$2,966
 $
 $
 $2,966
 $(218)
Discontinued Operations         
Property and equipment related to company-owned restaurants$
 $
 $
 $
 $
(1) In accordance with Subtopic 360-10, long-lived assets held and usedfor sale with a carrying amountvalue of approximately $1.5$3.6 million were written down to their fair value, less costs to sell, of approximately $1.3$3.3 million, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $0.2$0.3 million, which was included in earningsProvision for asset impairments in the period.quarter ended December 21, 2016. No impairments were recorded in the quarter ended December 16, 2015.
(2)    In accordance with Subtopic 360-20, goodwill with a carrying amount of approximately $1.7 million was written down to its implied fair value of approximately $1.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $38 thousand.

Note 5.6. Income Taxes 
 
No cash payments of estimated federal income taxes were made during the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016. 
 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent future taxable income is expected to be sufficient to utilize those assets prior to their expiration. If current available information and projected future results raises doubt about the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is necessary. Management established a $6.9 million valuation allowance in the prior year for its deferred tax assets considered more likely than not to expire before being realized. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets as of December 21, 2016, we considered available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, tax–planning strategies, projected future taxable income, and results of recent operations. Management determined that for the quarter ended December 21, 2016 an increase in the valuation allowance of approximately $1.1 million was necessary. This increase to the valuation allowance was included in the net tax benefit from continuing operations of $1.5 million in the quarter ended December 21, 2016. This compares to a tax benefit from continuing operations of $0.7 million in the quarter ended December 16, 2015.

The effective tax rate, (ETR), from continuing operations was 80%20.9% and 37%27.9% for the quarter and three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and December 16, 2015, respectively. The ETR for the quarter and three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 differs from the federal statutory rate of 34% due to the federal jobs credits, state income taxes and other discrete items. The additional deferred income tax benefit recognized in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 was attributable to the increase in the full year estimated pre-tax loss and a discrete deferred income tax benefit concerning the extension of the federal jobs credit.
 


Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been reflected in the financial statements and is not aware of any significant exposure items that have not been reflected in the financial statements. Amounts considered probable of settlement within one year have been included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
 


Note 6.7. Property and Equipment, Intangible Assets and Goodwill
 
The costs, net of impairment, and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment at June 1,December 21, 2016 and August 26, 2015,31, 2016, together with the related estimated useful lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, were as follows:
 
June 1,
2016
 August 26,
2015
 
Estimated
Useful Lives
(years)
December 21,
2016
 August 31,
2016
 
Estimated
Useful Lives
(years)
(In thousands)      (In thousands)      
Land$62,498
 $63,298
     $61,940
 $61,940
     
Restaurant equipment and furnishings74,876
 85,679
 3 to 1578,048
 75,764
 3 to 15
Buildings157,122
 159,391
 20 to 33158,128
 157,006
 20 to 33
Leasehold and leasehold improvements25,679
 29,229
 Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life26,845
 25,973
 Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life
Office furniture and equipment3,281
 3,559
 3 to 103,536
 3,277
 3 to 10
Construction in progress145
 810
     211
 145
     
323,601
 341,966
      328,708
 324,105
      
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(127,593) (141,764)      (136,751) (130,887)      
Property and equipment, net$196,008
 $200,202
      $191,957
 $193,218
      
Intangible assets, net$21,367
 $22,570
 15 to 21$20,630
 $21,074
 15 to 21
Goodwill$1,605
 $1,643
     

Intangible assets, net, consist of the Fuddruckers trade name and franchise agreements and will be amortized. The Company believes the Fuddruckers brand name has an expected accounting life of 21 years from the date of acquisition based on the expected use of its assets and the restaurant environment in which it is being used. The trade name represents a respected brand with customer loyalty and the Company intends to cultivate and protect the use of the trade name. The franchise agreements, after considering renewal periods, have an estimated accounting life of 21 years from the date of acquisition and will be amortized over this period of time.
 
Intangible assets, net, also includes the license agreement and trade name related to Cheeseburger in Paradise and the value of the acquired licenses and permits allowing the sales of beverages with alcohol. These assets have an expected accountinguseful life of 15 years from the date of acquisition, December 6, 2012.
 
The aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was $1.2approximately $0.4 million for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and $1.0approximately $0.5 million for the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization is expected to be approximately $1.4 million in each of the next five successive fiscal years.
 


The following table presents intangible assets as of June 1,December 21, 2016 and August 26, 2015:31, 2016:
 
June 1, 2016 August 26, 2015December 21, 2016 August 31, 2016
(In thousands) (In thousands)(In thousands) (In thousands)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization:                      
                      
Fuddruckers trade name and franchise agreements$29,607
 $(8,333) $21,274
 $29,607
 $(7,166) $22,441
$29,486
 $(8,969) $20,517
 $29,486
 $(8,535) $20,951
                      
Cheeseburger in Paradise trade name and license agreements$421
 $(328) $93
 $421
 $(292) $129
$421
 $(308) $113
 $421
 $(298) $123
                      
Intangible assets, net$30,028
 $(8,661) $21,367
 $30,028
 $(7,458) $22,570
$29,907
 $(9,277) $20,630
 $29,907
 $(8,833) $21,074
 
In fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an intangible asset for goodwill in the amount of approximately $0.2 million related to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers. The Company also recorded, in fiscal 2013, an intangible asset for goodwill in the amount of approximately $2.0 million related to the acquisition of Cheeseburger in Paradise. Goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized. Management performs its formal annual assessment as of the second quarter each fiscal year. The individual restaurant level is the level at which goodwill is assessed for impairment under ASC 350. In accordance with our understanding of ASC 350, we have allocated the goodwill value to each reporting unit in proportion to each location’s fair value at the date of acquisition. The result of these second quarter fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014 assessments was impairment of goodwill of $38 thousand. Goodwill impairments in fiscal years 2015 and 2014 werethousand, $38 thousand, and $0.5 million, respectively. The Company will formally perform additional assessments on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances exist that indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. As of June 1,December 21, 2016, of the 23 locations that were acquired, eight locations remain operating as Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants sevenand of the restaurants closed for conversion to Fuddruckers six locations remain operating as a Fuddruckers restaurant. Three locations were closed and convertedremoved due to Fuddruckers restaurants, three locations where the option to extend the leaseleases was not exercised, two locations were subleased to franchisees, and threethe remaining four closed and held for future use.
 
Goodwill, net of accumulated impairments of approximately $0.6 million, was approximately $1.6 million as of June 1,December 21, 2016 and as of August 26, 2015,31, 2016, and relates to our Company-owned restaurants reportable segment.
 
Note 7.8. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Discontinued Operations and Property Held for Sale
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Store Closings
 
The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets held for use and held for sale whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company analyzes historical cash flows of operating locations and compares results of poorer performing locations to more profitable locations. The Company also analyzes lease terms, condition of the assets and related need for capital expenditures or repairs, as well as construction activity and the economic and market conditions in the surrounding area.

For assets held for use, the Company estimates future cash flows using assumptions based on possible outcomes of the areas analyzed. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the location’s assets, the Company records an impairment loss based on an estimate of discounted cash flows. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management’s subjective judgments. Assumptions and estimates used include operating results, changes in working capital, discount rate, growth rate, anticipated net proceeds from disposition of the property and, if applicable, lease terms. The span of time for which future cash flows are estimated is often lengthy, increasing the sensitivity to assumptions made. The time span could be 20 to 25 years for newer properties, but only 5 to 10 years for older properties. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used, the estimated future cash flows projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a wide range of outcomes. The Company considers the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best estimate of future cash flows. The measurement for such an impairment loss is then based on the fair value of the asset as determined by discounted cash flows.


 
The Company recognized the following impairment charges to income from operations:
 
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands, except per share data)(In thousands, except per share data)
Provision for asset impairments$209
 $218
$287
 $
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment(793) (1,696)85
 (279)
      
$(584) $(1,478)$372
 $(279)
Effect on EPS:      
Basic$0.02
 $0.05
$(0.01) $0.01
Assuming dilution$0.02
 $0.05
$(0.01) $0.01
 
The $0.2approximate $0.3 million impairment charge for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 is primarily related to goodwill at one underperforming converted Cheeseburger in Paradise leasehold location and approximately $0.2 million in lease termination costs at two property locations.properties held for sale written down to their fair value.

The $0.2 millionThere was no impairment charge for the three quartersquarter ended May 6, 2015 is related to assets at three Fuddruckers locations and included $38 thousand in goodwill related to one underperforming converted Cheeseburger in Paradise leasehold location.December 16, 2015.
 
The $0.8approximate $0.1 million net gainloss for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 is related to the sale of property and equipment.
 
The $1.7approximate $0.3 million net gain for the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 is primarily related to the sale of property and equipment.one property.
 
Discontinued Operations 
 
On March 21, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board) approved a plan focused on improving cash flow from the acquired Cheeseburger in Paradise leasehold locations. This underperforming Cheeseburger in Paradise leasehold disposal plan called for certain Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants closure or conversion to Fuddruckers restaurants. As of June 1, 2016, two locations were reclassified to continuing operations. Of the two locations, one location reopened as a Company-owned Fuddruckers restaurant and one location was sub-leased to a Fuddruckers franchisee. Additionally, one lease was terminated and one lease expired during the three quarters ended June 1, 2016. As of June 1,December 21, 2016, no locations were classified as discontinued operations in this plan.
 
As a result of the first quarter fiscal year 2010 adoption of the Company’s Cash Flow Improvement and Capital Redeployment Plan, the Company reclassified 24 Luby’s Cafeterias to discontinued operations. As of June 1,December 21, 2016, one location remains held for sale.



The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities for all discontinued operations:
 
June 1,
2016
 August 26,
2015
December 21,
2016
 August 31,
2016
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Prepaid expenses1
 10
$
 $1
Assets related to discontinued operations—current$1
 $10
$
 $1
Property and equipment1,872
 1,872
$1,872
 $1,872
Other assets1,795
 1,799
1,250
 1,320
Assets related to discontinued operations—non-current$3,667
 $3,671
$3,122
 $3,192
Deferred income taxes$343
 $343
$361
 $361
Accrued expenses and other liabilities68
 65
23
 51
Liabilities related to discontinued operations—current$411
 $408
$384
 $412
Other liabilities$17
 $182
$16
 $17
Liabilities related to discontinued operations—non-current$17
 $182
$16
 $17



As of June 1,December 21, 2016, under both closure plans, the Company had one property classified as discontinued operations. The asset carrying value of the owned property was approximately $1.9 million and is included in assets related to discontinued operations. The Company is actively marketing this property for sale. The asset carrying values of the ground leases were previously impaired to zero.
 
The following table sets forth the sales and pretax losses reported from discontinued operations:
 
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands, except discontinued locations)(In thousands, except discontinued locations)
Sales$
 $
$
 $
      
Pretax loss(131) (642)(7) (118)
Income tax benefit from discontinued operations54
 298
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(77) $(344)
Income tax benefit (expense) from discontinued operations(65) 46
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(72) $(72)
Discontinued locations closed during the period
 

 

The following table summarizes discontinued operations for the first three quarters of fiscal 20162017 and 2015:2016: 
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands, except per share data)(In thousands, except per share data)
Discontinued operating loss$(156) $(550)$(7) $(118)
Impairments
 (90)
 
Net gains (losses)25
 (2)
 
Pretax loss$(131) $(642)$(7) $(118)
Income tax benefit from discontinued operations54
 298
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(77) $(344)
Income tax benefit (expense) from discontinued operations(65) 46
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(72) $(72)
Effect on EPS from discontinued operations—basic$(0.00) $(0.01)$(0.00) $(0.00)
  


Impairment charges included above relate to properties closed and designated for immediate disposal. The assetsdisposal as a result of these individual operating units have been written down to their net realizable values. In turn, the related properties have either been sold or are being actively marketed for sale. Dispositions are expected to be completed within one to three years. Within discontinued operations, the Company also recorded the relatedour two closure plans during fiscal year-to-date net operating results, employee terminations2010 and carrying costs of the closed units.2014.
 
Property Held for Sale
 
The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets against its plans to retain or ultimately dispose of properties. If the Company decides to dispose of a property, it will be moved to property held for sale, actively marketed and recorded at fair value less transaction costs. The Company analyzes market conditions each reporting period and records additional impairments due to declines in market values of like assets. The fair value of the property is determined by observable inputs such as appraisals and prices of comparable properties in active markets for assets like the Company’s. Gains are not recognized until the properties are sold.
 
Property held for sale includes unimproved land, closed restaurant properties, and related equipment for locations not classified as discontinued operations. The specific assets are valued at the lower of net depreciable value or net realizable value.
 
At June 1,December 21, 2016, the Company had fourfive owned properties recorded at approximately $4.2$5.2 million in property held for sale.
 
At August 26, 2015,31, 2016, the Company had fourfive owned properties recorded at approximately $4.5$5.5 million in property held for sale.
 
The Company is actively marketing the locations currently classified as property held for salesale.


 
Note 8.9. Commitments and Contingencies
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements, except for operating leases. 
 
Pending Claims
 
From time to time, the Company is subject to various private lawsuits, administrative proceedings, and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. A number of these lawsuits, proceedings, and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically involve claims from guests, employees, and others related to issues common to the restaurant industry. The Company currently believes that the final disposition of these types of lawsuits, proceedings, and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. It is possible, however, that the Company’s future results of operations for a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in circumstances relating to lawsuits, proceedings, or claims.

Construction Activity
 
From time to time, the Company enters into non-cancelable contracts for the construction of its new restaurants. This construction activity exposes the Company to the risks inherent in new construction,this industry, including but not limited to rising material prices, labor shortages, delays in getting required permits and inspections, adverse weather conditions, and injuries sustained by workers, and contract termination expenses. The Company had fourtwo such non-cancelable contracts with an approximate $0.7 million commitment remaining as of June 1,December 21, 2016.
 
Cheeseburger in Paradise, Royalty Commitment

The license agreement and trade name relates to a perpetual license to use intangible assets including trademarks, service marks and publicity rights related to Cheeseburger in Paradise owned by Jimmy Buffett and affiliated entities. In return, the Company pays a royalty fee of 2.5% of gross sales, less discounts, at the Company's operating Cheeseburger in Paradise locations to an entity owned or controlled by Jimmy Buffett. The trade name represents a respected brand with positive customer loyalty, and the Company intends to cultivate and protect the use of the trade name.
 
Note 9.10. Related Parties
 
Affiliate Services
 
Christopher J. Pappas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Harris J. Pappas, director and former Chief Operating Officer of the Company, own two restaurant entities (the “Pappas entities”) that from time to time may provide services to the Company and its subsidiaries, as detailed in the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement effective November 8, 2013dated May 28, 2015 among the Company and the Pappas entities.
 


Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement, the Pappas entities may provide specialized (customized) equipment fabrication and basic equipment maintenance, including stainless steel stoves, shelving, rolling carts, and chef tables. There were no costs incurred under the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement of custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment in the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015. Services provided under this agreement are subject to review and approval by the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”).Board.
 
Operating Leases
 
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, Messrs. Pappas became partners in a limited partnership which purchased a retail strip center in Houston, Texas. Messrs. Pappas collectively own a 50% limited partnership interest and a 50% general partnership interest in the limited partnership. A third party company manages the center. One of the Company’s restaurants has rented approximately 7% of the space in that center since July 1969. No changes were made to the Company’s lease terms as a result of the transfer of ownership of the center to the new partnership.
 


On November 22, 2006, the Company executed a new lease agreement with respect to this shopping center. Effective upon the Company’s relocation and occupancy into the new space in July 2008, the new lease agreement provides for a primary term of approximately 12 years with two subsequent five-year options and gives the landlord an option to buy out the tenant on or after the calendar year 2015 by paying the then unamortized cost of improvements to the tenant. The Company is currently obligated to pay rent of $22.00 per square foot plus maintenance, taxes, and insurance during the remaining primary term of the lease. Thereafter, the lease provides for increases in rent at set intervals. The Company made payments of $314,000$103 thousand and $278,000$103 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015, respectively. The new lease agreement was approved by the Finance and Audit Committee.
 
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, on March 12, 2014, the Company executed a new lease agreement in whichfor one of the Company’sCompany's Houston Fuddruckers locations was purchased from a prior landlord bywith Pappas Restaurants, Inc., a 100% undivided interest. No changes were made to our lease terms as a result of the transfer of ownership. The lease provides for a primary term of approximately six years with two subsequent five-year options. Pursuant to the new ground lease agreement, the Company is currently obligated to pay $27.56 per square foot plus maintenance, taxes, and insurance from March 12, 2014 until November 30, 2016. Thereafter, the new ground lease agreement provides for increases in rent at set intervals. The Company made payments of $120,000$41 thousand and $107,000$40 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015, respectivelyrespectively.
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED:   
Affiliated costs incurred:   
General and administrative expenses—professional and other costs$
 $
$
 $
Capital expenditures
 

 
Other operating expenses, occupancy costs and opening costs, including property leases434
 385
144
 143
Total$434
 $385
$144
 $143
RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS:   
Relative total Company costs:   
Selling, general and administrative expenses$32,312
 $26,671
$13,759
 $13,243
Capital expenditures14,358
 16,429
4,980
 5,729
Other operating expenses, occupancy costs and opening costs63,658
 59,507
26,288
 25,460
Total$110,328
 $102,607
$45,027
 $44,432
AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED AS A PERCENTAGE OF RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS0.39% 0.38%
Affiliated costs incurred as a percentage of relative total Company costs0.32% 0.32%
 
Board of Directors
 
Christopher J. Pappas is a member of the Advisory Board of Amegy Bank, a Division of ZB, N.A. (formerly, Amegy Bank, N.A.), which iswas a lender and syndication agent under the Company’s 2013 Revolving Credit Facility.Facility (as defined herein).
 


Key Management Personnel
 
The Company entered into a new employment agreement with Christopher Pappas on January 24, 2014. The employment agreement was amended on February 4, 2016, to extend the termination date thereof to August 31, 2017, unless earlier terminated.2017. Mr. Pappas continues to devote his primary time and business efforts to the Company while maintaining his role at Pappas Restaurants, Inc.
 
Peter Tropoli, a director of the Company and the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and formerly the Company’s Senior Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary, is an attorney and stepson of Frank Markantonis, who is a director of the Company.
 
Paulette Gerukos, Vice President of Human Resources of the Company, is the sister-in-law of Harris J. Pappas, who is a director of the Company.
 
Note 10.11. Share-Based Compensation
 
We have two active share based stock plans, the EmployeeLuby's Incentive Stock Plan, as amended and restated effective December 5, 2015 (the "Employee Stock Plan") and the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan. Both plans authorize the granting of stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards consistent with the purpose of the plans.


 
Of the 1.1 million shares approved for issuance under the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, 0.91.0 million options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards were granted, and 0.1 million options were cancelled or expired and added back into the plan, since the plan’s inception. Approximately 0.30.2 million shares remain available for future issuance as of June 1,December 21, 2016. Compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements under the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015 were approximately $524,000$192 thousand and $472,000,$197 thousand, respectively.

Of the aggregate 4.1 million shares approved for issuance under the Employee Stock Plan 5.7(which amount includes shares authorized under the original plan and shares authorized pursuant to the amended and restated plan effective as of December 5, 2015), 6.1 million options and restricted stock units were granted, and 3.43.5 million options and restricted stock units were cancelled or expired and added back into the plan, since the plan’s inception.inception in 2005. Approximately 1.81.5 million shares remain available for future issuance as of June 1,December 21, 2016. Compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements under the Employee Stock Plan, recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015 were approximately $827,000$241 thousand and $543,000,$455 thousand, respectively. Included in the quarter ended December 16, 2015, share based compensation cost was approximately $252,000,$252 thousand, which represented accelerated share-based compensation expense as a result of the cancellation of 312,663 stock options.
 
In 2015, theThe Company previously approved a Total Shareholder Return (TSR),("TSR") Performance Based Incentive Plan which provides for a right to receive an unspecified number of shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Plan based on the total shareholder return ranking compared to a selection of peer companies over a three-year cycle.cycle, for each plan year. The award value varies from 0% to 200% of a base amount, as a result of the Company’s TSR performance in comparison to its peers over the measurement period. The number of shares at the end of the three-year period will be determined as the award value divided by the closing stock price on the last day of each fiscal year accordingly. Since the plan provides for an undeterminable number of shares,awards, the plan is accounted for as a liability based plan. As of June 1,December 21, 2016, the estimated fair value of the performance sharesawards liability at the end of fiscalfor 2015, 2016 and 2017 plan years was $491 thousand, $526 thousand, and fiscal 2018, was $0.5 million for both years.$112 thousand, respectively. The estimated liability has been determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation model. Based on this estimate, management accrues expense ratably over the three-year service periods. A valuation estimate of the future liability associated with each fiscal year's performance award plan will be performed periodically with adjustments made to the outstanding liability at each reporting period, as appropriate. As of June 1,For the quarters ended December 21, 2016 and December 16, 2015, the Company has recorded $243,000$336 thousand and $74 thousand, respectively, in non-cash compensation expense in selling, general and administrative expenses related to its TSR Performance Based Incentive Plans.
 


Stock Options
 
Stock options granted under either the Employee Stock Plan or the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan have exercise prices equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant.
 
Option awards under the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan generally vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years from the grant date. No options were granted under the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016. No options to purchase shares remainwere outstanding under this plan as of June 1,December 21, 2016.
 
Options granted under the Employee Stock Plan generally vest 50% on the first anniversary date of the grant date, 25% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on the third anniversary of the grant date, with all options expiring ten years from the grant date. All options granted in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 were granted under the Employee Stock Plan. Options to purchase 1,208,5901,427,418 shares at option prices of $3.44 to $11.10 per share remain outstanding as of June 1,December 21, 2016.
 


A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 is presented in the following table:
 
Shares
Under
Fixed
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Shares
Under
Fixed
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  (Per share) (In years) (In thousands)  (Per share) (In years) (In thousands)
Outstanding at August 26, 20151,288,099
 $4.76
 6.5
 $460
Outstanding at August 31, 20161,169,238
 $4.76
 6.6
 $178
Granted279,944
 4.89
 
 
295,869
 4.26
 
 
Exercised(21,249) 3.51
 
 

 
 
 
Cancelled(312,663) 4.98
 
 

 
 
 
Forfeited/Expired(25,541) 4.34
 
 
(37,689) 5.39
 
 
Outstanding at June 1, 20161,208,590
 $4.76
 6.8
 $421
Exercisable at June 1, 2016661,099
 $4.76
 5.2
 $333
Outstanding at December 21, 20161,427,418
 $4.64
 7.2
 $163
Exercisable at December 21, 2016771,935
 $4.78
 5.6
 $142

The intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value, or closing price on June 1,December 21, 2016, and the grant price on the measurement dates in the table above. 
 
Restricted Stock Units
 
Grants of restricted stock units consist of the Company’s common stock and generally vest after three years. All restricted stock units are cliff-vested. Restricted stock units are valued at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.
 
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock unit activity during the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 is presented in the following table:
 
Restricted
Stock
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Restricted
Stock
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  (Per share) (In years)  (Per share) (In years)
Unvested at August 26, 2015409,417
 $5.98
 1.6
Unvested at August 31, 2016314,833
 $5.23
 1.9
Granted172,212
 4.87
 
194,708
 4.26
 
Vested(257,482) 6.19
 

 
 
Forfeited(4,202) 5.95
 

 
 
Unvested at June 1, 2016319,945
 $5.22
 2.1
Unvested at December 21, 2016509,541
 $4.86
 2.4
 


At June 1,December 21, 2016, there was approximately $1.0$1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.12.4 years.
 
Restricted Stock Awards
 
Under the Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, directors are granted restricted stock in lieu of cash payments, for all or a portion of their compensation as directors. Directors may receive a 20% premium of additional restricted stock by opting to receive stock over a minimum required amount of stock, in lieu of cash. The number of shares granted is valued at the closing marketaverage of the high and low price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant. Restricted stock awards vest when granted because they are granted in lieu of a cash payment. However, directors are restricted from selling their shares until after the third anniversary of the date of the grant. Directors may receive a 20% premium of additional restricted stock by opting to receive stock over a minimum required amount of stock, in lieu of cash. 
 


Note 11.12. Earnings Per Share
 
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and unvested restricted stock for the reporting period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. Stock options excluded from the computation of net income per share for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 include approximately 513,000971,549 shares with exercise prices exceeding market prices and approximately 98,000no shares whose inclusion would also be anti-dilutive. 

The components of basic and diluted net incomeloss per share are as follows:
 
Quarter Ended Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands, expect per share data)(In thousands, expect per share data)
Numerator:          
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(147) $2,484
 $(2,468) $(1,681)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes13
 (131) (77) (344)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$(134) $2,353
 $(2,545) $(2,025)
Loss from continuing operations$(5,514) $(1,739)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(72) (72)
NET LOSS$(5,586) $(1,811)
Denominator:          
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted-average shares29,259
 29,009
 29,207
 28,940
29,339
 29,133
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:          
Employee and non-employee stock options
 102
 
 

 
Denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution29,259
 29,111
 29,207
 28,940
29,339
 29,133
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:       
Loss per share from continuing operations:   
Basic$(0.01) $0.09
 $(0.09) $(0.06)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Assuming dilution$(0.01) $0.09
 $(0.09) $(0.06)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:       
Loss per share from discontinued operations:   
Basic$0.00
 $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.01)$(0.00) $(0.00)
Assuming dilution$0.00
 $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.01)$(0.00) $(0.00)
Net income (loss) per share:       
Net loss per share:   
Basic$(0.01) $0.08
 $(0.09) $(0.07)$(0.19) $(0.06)
Assuming dilution$(0.01) $0.08
 $(0.09) $(0.07)$(0.19) $(0.06)
   



 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes for the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10 (this “Form 10-Q”), and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2015.31, 2016.
 
The following presents an analysis of the results and financial condition of our continuing operations. Except where indicated otherwise, the results of discontinued operations are excluded from this discussion.



The following table sets forth selected operating data as a percentage of total revenues (unless otherwise noted) for the periods indicated. All information is derived from the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Percentages may not total due to rounding. 
Quarter Ended Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
Restaurant sales93.9 % 94.4 % 93.9 % 93.7 %94.5 % 94.0 %
Culinary contract services4.2 % 3.9 % 4.2 % 4.4 %3.8 % 4.1 %
Franchise revenue1.7 % 1.7 % 1.8 % 1.8 %1.6 % 1.8 %
Vending revenue0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 %0.1 % 0.1 %
TOTAL SALES100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %100.0 % 100.0 %
          
STORE COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
(As a percentage of restaurant sales)          
          
Cost of food28.0 % 28.4 % 28.4 % 29.1 %28.5 % 28.6 %
Payroll and related costs35.6 % 33.8 % 34.9 % 34.6 %35.8 % 34.7 %
Other operating expenses15.7 % 16.1 % 16.0 % 16.8 %18.2 % 16.2 %
Occupancy costs5.9 % 5.4 % 6.0 % 5.8 %6.0 % 5.8 %
Vending revenue(0.2)% (0.1)% (0.2)% (0.1)%(0.1)% (0.1)%
Store level profit15.0 % 16.4 % 14.9 % 13.9 %11.7 % 14.8 %
          
COMPANY COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
(As a percentage of total sales)          
          
Opening costs0.1 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.7 %0.1 % 0.3 %
Depreciation and amortization5.8 % 5.1 % 5.8 % 5.4 %5.7 % 5.8 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses10.0 % 8.6 % 10.6 % 9.8 %12.0 % 11.0 %
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment % (0.6)% (0.3)% (0.6)%0.1 % (0.2)%
          
Culinary Contract Services Costs          
(As a percentage of Culinary Contract Services sales)          
          
Cost of culinary contract services90.8 % 89.2 % 90.2 % 90.1 %88.7 % 90.0 %
Culinary income9.2 % 10.8 % 9.8 % 9.9 %11.3 % 10.0 %
          
Franchise Operations Costs          
(As a percentage of Franchise Operations)
          
          
Cost of franchise operations27.8 % 26.0 % 27.4 % 24.1 %31.0 % 28.8 %
Franchise income72.2 % 74.0 % 72.6 % 75.9 %69.0 % 71.2 %
          
(As a percentage of total sales)          
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS(0.4)% 3.7 % (0.7)% (0.6)%
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS(5.7)% (1.3)%
Interest income %  %  %  %0.0 % 0.0 %
Interest expense(0.5)% (0.6)% (0.5)% (0.6)%(0.5)% (0.6)%
Other income (expense), net0.1 %  %  % 0.1 %0.1 % (0.1)%
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations(0.8)% 3.1 % (1.2)% (1.1)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(0.6)% 0.4 % (0.5)% (0.5)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations(0.2)% 2.7 % (0.7)% (0.6)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes % (0.1)%  % (0.1)%
NET INCOME (LOSS)(0.2)% 2.6 % (0.7)% (0.7)%
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations(6.1)% (2.0)%
Benefit for income taxes(1.3)% (0.6)%
Loss from continuing operations(4.8)% (1.4)%
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(0.1)% (0.1)%
NET LOSS(4.9)% (1.5)%




Although store level profit, defined as restaurant sales less cost of food, payroll and related costs, other operating expenses, and occupancy costs is a non-GAAP measure, we believe its presentation is useful because it explicitly shows the results of our most significant reportable segment.   The following table reconciles between store level profit, a non-GAAP, measure to loss from continuing operations, a GAAP measure:
  
Quarter Ended Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands) (In thousands)(In thousands)
Store level profit$13,013
 $14,609
 $42,540
 $35,354
$12,595
 $16,783
          
Plus:          
Sales from culinary contract services3,892
 3,624
 12,726
 11,993
4,297
 4,915
Sales from franchise operations1,586
 1,578
 5,411
 4,764
1,871
 2,125
          
Less:          
Opening costs117
 427
 688
 2,022
165
 397
Cost of culinary contract services3,534
 3,232
 11,476
 10,809
3,811
 4,422
Cost of franchise operations441
 410
 1,480
 1,147
580
 612
Depreciation and amortization5,304
 4,759
 17,538
 14,608
6,550
 7,014
Selling, general and administrative expenses9,227
 8,139
 32,312
 26,671
13,759
 13,243
Provision for asset impairments172
 
 209
 218
287
 
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment42
 (609) (793) (1,696)85
 (279)
Interest income
 (1) (3) (3)(1) (1)
Interest expense482
 599
 1,674
 1,624
602
 696
Other income (expense), net(88) (24) 2
 (282)(103) 118
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(593) 395
 (1,438) (1,326)
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(147) $2,484
 $(2,468) $(1,681)
Benefit for income taxes(1,458) (660)
Loss from continuing operations$(5,514) $(1,739)
  
The following table shows our restaurant unit count as of August 26, 201531, 2016 and June 1,December 21, 2016.
 
Restaurant Counts:
 
August 26,
2015
 FY16 YTD Q3 Openings FY16 YTD Q3 Closings June 1,
2016
August 31,
2016
 FY17Q1
Openings
 FY17Q1
Closings
 December 21,
2016
Luby’s Cafeterias93
 
 (1) 92
91
 
 
 91
Fuddruckers Restaurants75
 3
 (1) 77
75
 
 (2) 73
Cheeseburger in Paradise8
 
 
 8
8
 
 
 8
Other restaurants(1)
1
 
 
 1
1
 
 
 1
Total177
 3
 (2) 178
175
 
 (2) 173
 
(1) Other restaurants include one Bob Luby’s Seafood Grill.









Overview
 
Luby’s, Inc. (“Luby’s” or “Company”) is a multi-branded company operating in the restaurant industry and in the contract food services industry. Our primary brands include Luby’s Cafeteria, Fuddruckers - World’s Greatest Hamburgers®, Luby’s Culinary Contract Services and Cheeseburger in Paradise.
 
Our Company’s vision is that our guests, employees and shareholders stay loyal to our restaurant brands and value them as a significant part of their lives. We want our company’s performance to make it a leader in our industry.
 
We are headquartered in Houston, Texas. Our corporate headquarters is located at 13111 Northwest Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77040, and our telephone number at that address is (713) 329-6800. Our website is www.lubysinc.com. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference into any of our other filings with the SEC.
 
As of June 1,December 21, 2016, we owned and operated 178173 restaurants, of which 9291 are traditional cafeterias, 7773 are gourmet hamburger restaurants, eight are casual dining restaurants and bars, and one primarily serves seafood. These establishments are located in close proximity to retail centers, business developments and residential areas mostly throughout the United States. Included in the 178173 restaurants that we own and operate are 12 restaurants located at six property locations where we operate a side-by-side Luby’s Cafeteria and Fuddruckers on the same property. We refer to these locations as “Combo locations.”
 
As of June 1,December 21, 2016, we operated 2623 Culinary Contract Services locations; 1714 in the Houston, Texas area three in Louisiana, and one in each of Dallas, Texas and San Antonio, Texas. Outside of Texas we operate one in each of the following states: North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Missouri, and Massachusetts. Luby’s Culinary Contract Services currently provides food service management to healthcare educational and corporate dining facilities.
 
As of June 1,December 21, 2016, we had 5248 franchisees operating 114113 Fuddruckers restaurants. Our largest sixfive franchise owners own five to twelve restaurants each. FifteenEighteen franchise owners each own two to four restaurants. The 3125 remaining franchise owners each own one restaurant.
 
Accounting Periods
 
OurThe Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. Accordingly, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, or accounting periods, accounting for 364 days in the aggregate. In fiscalHowever, every fifth or sixth year, 2015, and prior, each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year consisted of three four-week periods, while the fourth quarter normally consisted of four four-week periods. Beginning in fiscal year 2016, the first quarter consisted of four four-week periods, while the last three quarters will normally consist of three four-week periods. However, fiscal year 2016 iswe have a fiscal year consistingthat consists of 53 weeks, accounting for 371 days in the aggregate. Asaggregate; fiscal 2016 was such a year. The first fiscal quarter consists of four four-week periods, or 16 weeks, and the remaining three quarters typically includes three four-week periods, or 12 weeks, in length. The fourth fiscal quarter ofincludes 13 weeks in certain fiscal years to adjust for our standard 52 week, or 364 day, fiscal year 2016 will contain one five-week period, resulting in a 13-week fourth quarter, or 91 days incompared to the aggregate.365 day calendar year. Comparability between quarters may be affected by the varying lengths of the quarters, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business.
 
Same-Store Sales
 
The restaurant business is highly competitive with respect to food quality, concept, location, price, and service, all of which may have an effect on same-store sales. Our same-store sales calculation measures the relative performance of a certain group of restaurants. A restaurant’s sales results are included in the same-store sales calculation in the quarter after a store has been open for six consecutive fiscal quarters. Our Company-owned Fuddruckers restaurants were included in this measurement beginning with the third quarter fiscal 2012. The Cheeseburger in Paradise stores that were acquired in December 2012 were included in the same-store metric beginning the first quarter fiscal 2015. Stores that close on a permanent basis are removed from the group in the quarter when operations cease at the restaurant, but remain in the same-store group for previously reported quarters. Although management believes this approach leads to more effective year-over-year comparisons, neither the time frame nor the exact practice may be similar to those used by other restaurant companies. 



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Quarter Ended June 1,December 21, 2016 Compared to Quarter Ended May 6,December 16, 2015
 
Comparability between quarters is affected by the varying lengths of the quarters and quarters ending at different points in the calendar year when seasonal patterns for sales are different. TheBoth the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 consisted of 12 weeks and the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 consisted of 12 weeks, and while both quarters were 12 weeks in length, the quarters ended at different points in the calendar year. For comparison to the 12-week quarter ended June 1, 2016, certain tables and comments, in this management discussion and analysis, also present a comparable 12-week period ended June 3, 2015. In addition, the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 was 40 weeks in length, while the three quarters ended May 6, 2015 was 36 weeks in length. For comparison to the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, certain tables and comments in this management discussion and analysis also present a comparable 40-week period ended June 3, 2015.16 weeks.

Sales 
Quarter
Ended
 Quarter
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter
Ended
 Quarter
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/
(Decrease)
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/
(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Restaurant sales$86,476
 $88,788
 $87,805
 (1.5)%$108,082
 $113,546
 (4.8)%
Culinary contract services3,892
 3,624
 3,343
 16.4 %4,297
 4,915
 (12.6)%
Franchise revenue1,586
 1,578
 1,605
 (1.2)%1,871
 2,125
 (12.0)%
Vending revenue143
 112
 116
 23.3 %159
 158
 0.6 %
TOTAL SALES$92,097
 $94,102
 $92,869
 (0.8)%$114,409
 $120,744
 (5.2)%
 
Total sales decreased approximately $2.0$6.3 million, or 2.1%5.2%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015, consisting primarily of an approximate $2.3$5.5 million decrease in restaurant sales, offset by an approximate $0.3$0.6 million increasedecrease in Culinary Contract Services sales. The other components of total sales are franchise revenue and vending revenue, which increased $8 thousand and $31 thousand, respectively, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015.

Total sales decreased approximately $0.8 million, or 0.8%, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, consisting primarily of an approximate $1.3 million decrease in restaurant sales offset by an approximate $0.5 million increase in Culinary Contract Services sales. The other components of total sales are franchise revenue and vending revenue, which decreased $19 thousand and increased $27 thousand, respectively, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.

 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/
(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Restaurant sales$286,336
 $254,832
 $283,500
 1.0 %
Culinary contract services12,726
 11,993
 13,058
 (2.5)%
Franchise revenue5,411
 4,764
 5,309
 1.9 %
Vending revenue437
 355
 398
 9.8 %
TOTAL SALES$304,910
 $271,944
 $302,265
 0.9 %

Total sales increased approximately $2.6 million, or 0.9%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, consisting primarily of an approximate $2.8 million increase in restaurant sales, and an approximate $0.1 million increase in franchise revenue, offset by an approximate $0.3 million decrease in Culinary Contract


Services sales.franchise revenue. The other component of total sales is vending revenue, which increased $39$1 thousand in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable periodquarter ended June 3,December 16, 2015.


The Company has three reportable segments: Company-owned restaurants, franchise operations, and culinary contract services.
 
Company-Owned Restaurants
 
Restaurant Sales 
($000s)
Quarter
Ended
 
Quarter
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
Restaurant BrandDecember 21, December 16, Increase/(Decrease)
Quarter
Ended
 
Quarter
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
2016 2015 $ Amount % Change
Restaurant BrandJune 1, May 6, June 3, Increase/(Decrease)
($000s) 2016 2015 2015 $ Amount % Change
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Luby’s Cafeterias$51,808
 $53,975
 $52,937
 $(1,129) (2.1)%$68,339
 $70,905
 $(2,566) (3.6)%
Fuddruckers24,790
 24,204
 24,078
 712
 3.0 %28,748
 30,880
 (2,132) (6.9)%
Combo locations5,280
 6,355
 6,162
 (882) (14.3)%6,626
 7,020
 (394) (5.6)%
Cheeseburger in Paradise4,598
 4,254
 4,628
 (30) (0.6)%4,369
 4,741
 (372) (7.8)%
Restaurant Sales$86,476
 $88,788
 $87,805
 $(1,329) (1.5)%$108,082
 $113,546
 $(5,464) (4.8)%
 
Restaurant sales decreased approximately $2.3$5.5 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Sales at stand-alone Luby's Cafeteria restaurants decreased approximately $2.2$2.6 million to approximately $51.8$68.3 million; sales from stand-alone Fuddruckers locations increased bydecreased approximately $0.6$2.1 million to approximately $24.8$28.7 million; sales at Combo locations decreased approximately $1.1$0.4 million to approximately $5.3 million; and sales at Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants increased by approximately $0.3 million to approximately $4.6 million.

Restaurant sales decreased approximately $1.3 million in the quarter ended June 1, 2016, compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. Sales at stand-alone Luby's Cafeteria restaurants decreased approximately $1.1 million to approximately $51.8 million; sales from stand-alone Fuddruckers locations increased by approximately $0.7 million to approximately $24.8 million; sales at Combo locations decreased approximately $0.9 million to approximately $5.3$6.6 million; and sales at Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants decreased by $30 thousandapproximately $0.4 million to approximately $4.6$4.4 million.



The approximate $1.1$2.6 million sales decrease in stand-alone Luby's Cafeteria restaurants was the result of the closure of threetwo locations and a 0.2%2.2% decrease in same-store sales. The 0.2% decrease in2.2% Luby's Cafeteria same-store sales decrease was the result of a 3.7% increase1.4% decrease in guest traffic offset byand a 3.9%0.8% decrease in average spend per guest. The approximate $0.7$2.1 million sales increasedecrease at stand-alone Fuddruckers restaurants was the result of eightsix restaurant openingsclosings (five on a permanent basis and one on a temporary basis for remodeling) and a 1.6% decrease in same-store sales, offset by the closureopening of three locations and a 1.0% decrease in same-store sales.Fuddruckers locations. The 1.0%1.6% decrease in Fuddruckers same-store sales was the result of a 1.9% decline2.7% decrease in guest traffic offset by a 0.9%1.1% increase in average spend per guest. All eight stores that we operate as Cheeseburger in Paradise are included in our same-store grouping and sales at this group of restaurants decreased 0.6%7.8% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable periodquarter ended June 3,December 16, 2015. Combo location sales decreased $0.4 million and represented 6.1% of total restaurant sales in the quarter ended December 21, 2016. Our sixth Combo location opened in the third quarter fiscal 2015 with a high volume of sales which was sustained through the quarter ended December 16, 2015, creating a challenging comparison for the quarter ended December 21, 2016. The approximate $0.9$0.4 million decrease in sales at our Combo locationslocation sales was due to that comparison and a comparison against a high volume2.3% same-store sales period indecrease at the prior year following the opening of our sixth Combo location; theother five Combo locations included in our same-store grouping decreased sales by 3.3%.



 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Restaurant BrandJune 1, May 6, June 3, Increase/(Decrease)
($000s) 2016 2015 2015 $ Amount % Change
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Luby’s Cafeterias$175,628
 $159,099
 $176,191
 $(563) (0.3)%
Fuddruckers80,237
 68,475
 76,496
 3,741
 4.9 %
Combo locations17,595
 16,349
 18,298
 (703) (3.8)%
Cheeseburger in Paradise12,876
 10,909
 12,515
 361
 2.9 %
Total Restaurant Sales$286,336
 $254,832
 $283,500
 $2,836
 1.0 %

Restaurant sales increased approximately $2.8 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. Sales at stand-alone Luby's Cafeteria restaurants decreased approximately $0.6 million to approximately $175.6 million; sales from stand-alone Fuddruckers locations increased by approximately $3.7 million to approximately $80.2 million; sales at Combo locations decreased approximately $0.7 million to approximately $17.6 million; and sales at Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants increased by approximately $0.4 million to approximately $12.9 million.

The approximate $0.6 million sales decrease in stand-alone Luby's Cafeteria restaurants was the result of a 1.4% increase in same-store sales offset by the closure of three locations. The 1.4% increase in Luby's Cafeteria same-store sales was the result of a 2.9% increase in guest traffic offset by a 1.5% decrease in average spend per guest. The approximate $3.7 million sales increase at stand-alone Fuddruckers restaurants was the result of eight restaurant openings and a same-store sales increase of 0.2%, offset by the closure of three locations. Fuddruckers same-store sales increase of 0.2% was the result of a 3.2% decline in guest traffic offset by a 3.4% increase in average spend per guest. The approximate $0.7 million decrease in sales at our Combo locations was due to comparison against a high volume sales period in the prior year following the opening of our sixth Combo location and a decline in Combo same-store sales of 1.9%. All eight stores that we operate as Cheeseburger in Paradise are included in our same-store grouping and this group of restaurants realized a 2.9% increase in sales in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.

Cost of Food 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 
Increase/
(Decrease)
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 
Increase/
(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Cost of food$24,221
 $25,218
 $24,935
 (2.9)%$30,850
 $32,434
 (4.9)%
As a percentage of restaurant sales28.0% 28.4% 28.4% (0.4)%28.5% 28.6% (0.1)%
 
Cost of food decreased approximately $1.0$1.6 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. As a percentage of restaurant sales, cost of food decreased 0.4%0.1% to 28.0%28.5% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015.

Cost of food decreased approximately $0.7 million in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due primarily to decreases in food commodity costs, particularly with beef costs which were 22% lower at Fuddruckers where the core menu items include hamburgers. As a percentage of restaurant sales, cost of food decreased 0.4% to 28.0% in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. Food commodity prices for our basket of food commodity purchases decreased approximately 3% at our Luby’s Cafeterias locations and approximately 8% at our Fuddruckers restaurants in the quarter ended June 1, 2016.



 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Cost of food$81,256
 $74,171
 $82,303
 (1.3)%
As a percentage of restaurant sales28.4% 29.1% 29.0% (0.6)%

Cost of food decreased approximately $1.0 million, or 1.3%, for the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due primarily to decreases in food commodity costs, particularly with beef costs which were 23% lower at Fuddruckers where the core menu items include hamburgers. As a percentage of restaurant sales, cost of food decreased 0.6% to 28.4% in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. Food commodity prices for our basket of food commodity purchases decreased approximately 3.0% at our Luby’s Cafeterias locations and approximately 7.0% at our Fuddruckers restaurants for the three quarters ended June 1, 2016.

Payroll and Related Costs 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Payroll and related costs$30,748
 $29,971
 $29,782
 3.2%$38,673
 $39,424
 (1.9)%
As a percentage of restaurant sales35.6% 33.8% 33.9% 1.7%35.8% 34.7% 1.1 %
 
Payroll and related costs increaseddecreased approximately $0.8 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015 and increased approximately $1.0 million compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015. The increase is primarilydecrease includes an approximate $0.5 million reduction in workers' compensation liability estimates as well as lower payroll and related tocosts associated with operating six fewer restaurants, partially offset by higher average hourly wage rates increased scheduling of hourly overtime, our investments in training and leadership development, as well as higher workers' compensation expense. As a percentage of restaurant sales, payroll and related costs increased 1.8% to 35.6% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to 33.8% in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. As a percentage of restaurant sales, payroll and related costs increased 1.7%,1.1% to 35.6%35.8% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to 33.9%34.7% in the 12-week comparable periodquarter ended June 3,December 16, 2015 due to the cost increases discussed above while we experienced modest same-store sales declines.

 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Payroll and related costs$100,007
 $88,177
 $98,047
 2.0%
As a percentage of restaurant sales34.9% 34.6% 34.6% 0.3%

Payroll and related costs increased approximately $2.0 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due to increases in both hourly employee costs and restaurant management costs. Increases in payroll costs is primarily related to investments in training and leadership development as well as higher variable management compensation on improved store level profitability, increased scheduling of hourly overtime, and higher average hourly wage rates all partially offset by lower workers' compensation expense. As a percentageas well as the fixed cost component of restaurant sales, payroll and related costs increased 0.3%, to 34.9% in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to 34.6% in the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due the cost increases discussed above which grew more than our 1.0% increase in restaurant sales.

(mainly management labor) with lower overall sales volumes.


Other Operating Expenses 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Other operating expenses$13,572
 $14,276
 $14,215
 (4.5)%$19,648
 $18,421
 6.7%
As a percentage of restaurant sales15.7% 16.1% 16.2% (0.5)%18.2% 16.2% 2.0%



Other operating expenses primarily include restaurant-related expenses for utilities, repairs and maintenance, local store advertising, property and liability insurance losses above insurance deductibles, services and supplies. Other operating expenses decreasedincreased approximately $0.7$1.2 million, or 4.9%6.7%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Other operating expenses decreased by approximately $0.6 million, or 4.5% in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015, due primarily to (1) an approximate $0.3$0.7 million decreaseincrease in repairs and maintenance expense andexpense; (2) an approximate $0.3$0.4 million decrease utilitiesincrease in restaurant services and supplies, including higher costs for computer network connectivity, point of sale software, restaurant security, and food-to-go delivery charges to third parties; and (3) an approximate $0.1 million increase in utility expense. As a percentage of restaurant sales, other operating expenses decreased 0.5%increased 2.0%, to 15.7%18.2%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, compared to 16.2% for the 12-week comparable periodthe quarter ended June 3, 2015.
 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Other operating expenses$45,728
 $42,688
 $47,363
 (3.5)%
As a percentage of restaurant sales16.0% 16.8% 16.7% (0.7)%

Other operating expenses decreased by approximately $1.6 million, or 3.5% in the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compareddue to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, due primarily to (1) an approximate $1.0 million decrease in utilities expense; (2) an approximate $0.8 million decrease in repairs and maintenance expense; (3) an approximate $0.4 million decrease in store-level marketing expense and (4) an approximate $0.1 million decrease in lossescost increases enumerated above insurance deductibles; offset by (5) an approximate $0.7 million increase in restaurant supplies, services, and other operating expenses. As a percentage of restauranton lower overall sales other operating expenses decreased 0.7%, to 16.0%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, compared to 16.7% for the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.volumes.

Occupancy Costs 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Occupancy costs$5,065
 $4,826
 $4,819
 5.1%$6,475
 $6,642
 (2.5)%
As a percentage of restaurant sales5.9% 5.4% 5.5% 0.4%6.0% 5.8% 0.2 %
 
Occupancy costs include property lease expense, property taxes, common area maintenance charges, and property insurance expense. Occupancy costs increaseddecreased approximately $0.2 million to approximately $5.1$6.5 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Occupancy costs increased approximately $0.2 million to approximately $5.1 million in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015. The increasedecrease was primarily due to a net increase of three store locationsdecrease in property taxes and higher property insurance expense.expense associated with operating six fewer restaurants in the quarter ended December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended December 16, 2015.



 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Occupancy costs$17,242
 $14,797
 $16,413
 5.1%
As a percentage of restaurant sales6.0% 5.8% 5.8% 0.2%

Occupancy costs increased approximately $0.8 million to approximately $17.2 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a net increase of three locations, higher property tax expense, and higher property insurance expense.

Franchise Operations  
 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)
Franchise revenue$1,586
 $1,578
 $1,605
 (1.2)%
Cost of franchise operations441
 410
 403
 9.4 %
Franchise profit$1,145
 $1,168
 $1,202
 (4.7)%
Franchise profit as a percentage of franchise revenue72.2% 74.0% 74.9% (2.7)%

 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Franchise revenue$5,411
 $4,764
 $5,309
 1.9 %
Cost of franchise operations1,480
 1,147
 1,283
 15.4 %
Franchise profit$3,931
 $3,617
 $4,026
 (2.4)%
Franchise profit as a percentage of franchise revenue72.6% 75.9% 75.8% (3.2)%

We only offer franchises for the Fuddruckers brand. Franchises are sold in markets where expansion is deemed advantageous to the development of the Fuddruckers concept and system of restaurants. Franchise revenue includes (1) royalties paid to us as the franchisor for the Fuddruckers brand and (2) franchise fees paid to us when franchise units are opened for business or transferred to new owners. Franchise revenue increased $8 thousand in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015 and decreased $19 thousand compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. The $19 thousand decrease in franchise revenue includes an approximate $126 thousand decrease in franchise royalties and an approximate $107 thousand increase in non-royalty related fee income.

Franchise revenue increased approximately $0.1 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. The $0.1 million increase in franchise revenue includes an approximate $0.2 million increase in non-royalty related fee income offset by an approximate $0.1 million decrease in royalty income.



Cost of Franchise Operations
Cost of franchise operations includes the direct costs associated with supporting franchisees with opening new Fuddruckers franchised restaurants and the corporate overhead expenses associated with generating franchise revenue. These corporate expenses primarily include the salaries and benefits, travel and related expenses, and other expenses for employees whose primary job function involves supporting our franchise owners and the development of new franchise locations. Cost of franchise operations increased $31locations

 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Franchise revenue$1,871
 $2,125
 (12.0)%
Cost of franchise operations580
 612
 (5.2)%
Franchise profit$1,291
 $1,513
 (14.7)%
Franchise profit as a percentage of franchise revenue69.0% 71.2% (2.2)%

Franchise revenue decreased $254 thousand in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015December 16, 2015. The $254 thousand decrease in franchise revenue includes (1) an approximate $151 thousand decrease in franchise royalties due in part to the closure of certain high sales volume franchise locations, lower international royalty income, and increased $38same-store sales declines at franchise locations and (2) an approximate $103 thousand decrease in non-royalty related fee income due to fewer openings in the quarter ended December 21, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable periodquarter ended June 3,December 16, 2015.



Cost of Franchise Operations

Cost of franchise operations decreased $32 thousand in the quarter ended December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended December 16, 2015, primarily as a result of increased overhead costdecreased travel costs to support franchise operations and costs associated with four franchise openings in the quarter ended June 1, 2016.operations. Franchise profit, defined as Franchise revenue less Cost of franchise operations, decreased $23$222 thousand in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 due to lower royalty income and decreased $57 thousand in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.  franchise fee income.

Cost of franchise operations increased approximately $0.2 million, or 15.4%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, primarily as a result of increased overhead cost to support franchise operations and the opening of new franchise locations. Franchisees opened five international locations (one in each of Colombia, Mexico, and Panama; and two in Italy) and seven domestic locations (one in each of Michigan, Montana, California, Florida, and Texas; and two in Virgina) in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016. Franchise profit, defined as Franchise revenue less Cost of franchise operations, decreased $95 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.  

Culinary Contract Services
 
Culinary Contract Services is a business line servicing healthcare, higher education, and corporate dining clients. The healthcare accounts are full service and typically include in-room delivery, catering, vending, coffee service and retail dining. We operated 2623 Culinary Contract Services locations at the end of the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and 2128 at the end of the quarter ended May 6, 2015 and at the end of the comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015. We focus on clients who are able to enter into agreements wherein which all operating costs are reimbursed to us and we generally charge a fixed fee. These agreements typically present lower financial risk to the company.Company.
 
Culinary Contract Services Revenue 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Culinary contract services sales$3,892
 $3,624
 $3,343
 16.4%$4,297
 $4,915
 (12.6)%
Cost of culinary contract services3,534
 3,232
 3,064
 15.3%3,811
 4,422
 (13.8)%
Culinary contract profit$358
 $392
 $279
 28.3%$486
 $493
 (1.4)%
Culinary contract profit as a percentage of Culinary contract sales9.2% 10.8% 8.3% 0.9%
Culinary contract services profit as a percentage of Culinary contract services sales11.3% 10.0% 1.3 %
 
Culinary Contract Services revenue increaseddecreased approximately $0.3$0.6 million, or 7.4%12.6%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Culinary Contract Services revenue increased approximately $0.5 million, or 16.4%, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015. The increasedecrease in Culinary Contract Services revenue was primarily the result of an increasea decrease in the number of locations operated.
 
Cost of Culinary Contract Services includes the food, payroll and related costs, other direct operating expenses, and corporate overhead expenses associated with generating Culinary Contract Services sales. Cost of Culinary Contract Services increaseddecreased approximately $0.3$0.6 million, or 9.3%13.8%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Cost of Culinary Contract Services increased approximately $0.5 million, or 15.3%, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, consistent with the increase in Culinary Contract Services revenue. Culinary Contract Services profit margin, defined as Culinary Contract Services revenue less Cost of Culinary Contract Services, decreasedincreased to 9.2%11.3% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 from 10.8%10.0% in the the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Culinary Contract Services profit margin increasedDecember 16, 2015 due to 9.2%the change in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 from 8.3% in the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.mix of our Culinary agreements with clients.



 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Culinary contract services sales$12,726
 $11,993
 $13,058
 (2.5)%
Cost of culinary contract services11,476
 10,809
 11,771
 (2.5)%
Culinary contract profit$1,250
 $1,184
 $1,287
 (2.9)%
Culinary contract profit as a percentage of Culinary contract sales9.8% 9.9% 9.9% (0.1)%

Culinary Contract Services revenue decreased approximately $0.3 million, or 2.5%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. The decrease in Culinary Contract Services revenue was the result of higher sales volume locations ceasing operations over the past 12 months, replaced with locations that are smaller in nature and thus generate lower sales volumes.  

Cost of Culinary Contract Services includes the food, payroll and related costs, other direct operating expenses, and corporate overhead expenses associated with generating Culinary Contract Services sales. Cost of Culinary Contract Services decreased approximately $0.3 million, or 2.5%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015, consistent with a decrease in Culinary Contract Services revenue. Culinary Contract Services profit margin, defined as Culinary Contract Services revenue less Cost of Culinary Contract Services, decreased to 9.8% in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 from 9.9% in the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.
 Company-wide Expenses
 
Opening Costs
 
Opening costs include labor, supplies, occupancy, and other costs necessary to support the restaurant through its opening period. Opening costs were approximately $0.1$0.2 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to approximately $0.4 million in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Both quarters included carrying costs of locations to be developed for future restaurant openings. The approximate $0.1$0.2 million in opening costs in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 included the carrying costs for two locations where we previously operated as Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants. The $0.4 million in opening costs in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 included the carrying costs for six locations where we previously operated as Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants and one location that we previously operated as a Koo Koo Roo Chicken Bistro.

Opening costs were approximately $0.7 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to approximately $2.0 million in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015. Both three-quarter periods included carrying costs of locations to be developed for future restaurant openings. The approximate $0.7 million in opening costs in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 included the carrying costs for five locations where we previously operated as Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants and the opening costs for threerestaurants. Two of these locations opened as Fuddruckers restaurants that opened in the three quartersquarter ended June 1, 2016. The approximate $2.0 million in opening costs in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015 included the carrying costs associated with nine locations that were previously operated as Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants, the opening costs for three Fuddruckers restaurants that opened in the three quarters ended May 6,December 16, 2015 and one opened after the opening costs associated with a Combo location that opened inend of the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The other two locations remain available for possible future restaurant openings.




Depreciation and Amortization Expense 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
Depreciation and amortization$5,304
 $4,759
 $4,832
 9.8%$6,550
 $7,014
 (6.6)%
As a percentage of total sales5.8% 5.1% 5.2% 0.6%5.7% 5.8% (0.1)%
 


Depreciation and amortization expense increaseddecreased by approximately $0.5 million, or 11.5%6.6%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $0.5 million, or 9.8%, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015 due primarily to reduced capital investment, certain assets reaching the additionend of their depreciable lives, and timing of depreciation related to new capital expenditures for restaurant conversions and restaurant remodeling activity, the sixth Combo location opened incharges within fiscal 2015, and information technology infrastructure investments.2016.

 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
Depreciation and amortization$17,538
 $14,608
 $16,261
 7.9%
As a percentage of total sales5.8% 5.4% 5.4% 0.4%

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $1.3 million, or 7.9%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due primarily to the addition of depreciation related to new capital expenditures for restaurant conversions and restaurant remodeling activity, the sixth Combo location opened in fiscal 2015, and information technology infrastructure investments.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Comparable
Period Ended
 Q3FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
Quarter 
Ended
 
Quarter 
Ended
 Q1FY2017 vs
Q1FY2016
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
(12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (12 weeks vs 12 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks) (16 weeks vs 16 weeks)
General and administrative expenses$8,146
 $7,593
 $7,360
 10.7%$11,433
 $11,455
 (0.2)%
Marketing and advertising expenses1,081
 546
 486
 122.4%2,326
 1,788
 30.1 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses$9,227
 $8,139
 $7,846
 17.6%$13,759
 $13,243
 3.9 %
As a percentage of total sales10.0% 8.6% 8.4% 1.6%12.0% 11.0% 1.0 %
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses include corporate salaries and benefits-related costs, including restaurant area leaders, share-based compensation, marketing and advertising expense, professional fees, travel and recruiting expenses and other office expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.0$0.5 million, or 13.4%3.9%, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.4 million, or 17.6%, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015. Increases in selling, general and administrative expense include (1) an approximate $0.6$0.5 million increase in marketing and advertising expense; (2) an approximate $0.5$0.3 million increase in outside professional service fees employee moving costs, and network infrastructure costs andcosts; (3) a net increase of approximately $0.3$0.2 million increase in liability insurance, travel, bank charges, and other administrative costs; offset by (4) a decrease of approximately $0.5 million in salaries and benefits expense. The approximate $0.6$0.5 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses is intended to motivate increased guest visits, increased frequency of visits, and increased overall brand awareness. This includes sponsorships and partnerships with sports teams that we believe enhance our visibility and appeal within our core markets.markets as well as other marketing commitments entered into prior to the start of the quarter ended December 21, 2016. As a percentage of total revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 10.0%12.0% in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, compared to 8.6%11.0% in the the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. As a percentage of total sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 10.0% in the quarter ended June 1, 2016, compared to 8.4% in the 12-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.


 Three Quarters Ended Three Quarters Ended Comparable
Period Ended
 YTDQ3 FY2016 vs
Comparable Period
($000s)June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
 June 3,
2015
 Increase/(Decrease)
 (40 weeks) (36 weeks) (40 weeks) (40 weeks vs 40 weeks)
General and administrative expenses$27,926
 $24,405
 $26,922
 3.7%
Marketing and advertising expenses4,386
 2,266
 2,386
 83.8%
Selling, general and administrative expenses$32,312
 $26,671
 $29,308
 10.2%
As a percentage of total sales10.6% 9.8% 9.7% 0.9%

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $3.0 million, or 10.2%, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015. Increases in selling, general and administrative expense include (1) an approximate $2.0 million increase in marketing and advertising expense; (2) an approximate $0.7 million increase in outside professional service fees, employee moving costs, and network infrastructure costs; (3) a net increase of approximately $0.1 million in salaries and benefits expense, health insurance costs and employee travel costs and (4) an approximate net increase of $0.2 million in corporate supplies and other corporate overhead costs. The $2.0 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses is intended to motivate increased guest visits, increased frequency of visits, and increased overall brand awareness. This includes sponsorships and partnerships with sports teams that we believe enhance our visibility and appeal within our core markets. As a percentage of total sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 10.6% in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, compared to 9.7% in the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015.

Provision for Asset Impairments
 
The provision for asset impairments of approximately $0.2$0.3 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 related to lease termination costs.property held for sale written down to its fair value. There was no impairment charge for the quarter ended December 16, 2015.

The provision for asset impairments of approximately $0.2 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 related to $38 thousand in goodwill associated with one Cheeseburger in Paradise assets and approximately $0.2 million in lease termination costs. The provision for asset impairments in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015 was approximately $0.2 million and reflected the impairment of three leased Fuddruckers locations (two of which were converted from Cheeseburger in Paradise locations) and goodwill related to one under-performing converted Cheeseburger in Paradise leasehold location.
 
Net (Gain) Loss on Disposition of Property and Equipment
 
Loss on disposition of property and equipment was $42$85 thousand in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and primarily reflects normal asset retirements.retirement activity. The gain on disposition of property and equipment was approximately $0.6$0.3 million in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 and primarily reflects the sale of one property where we operated a cafeteria up until the time of the sale, offset by normal asset retirement activity.

Gain on disposition of property and equipment was approximately $0.8 million in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 and primarily reflects the gain on the sale of one property that we had previously acquired for possible development and the gain on the sale of property where we operated a cafeteria up until the time of the sale offset by normal asset retirement activity. Gain on disposition of property and equipment was approximately $1.7 million in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015 related primarily to the sale of one owned property location that served as rental property and the sale of one property where we operated a cafeteria up until the time of the sale, offset by normal asset retirement activity and by a loss from franchise equipment sales.




Interest Income
 
Interest income was $1 thousand in the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Interest income was $3 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015.


Interest Expense
 
Interest expense decreased approximately $0.1 million, or 19.5%13.5%, to approximately $0.5$0.6 million in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. This decrease was due primarily to lower average debt balances. Interesthigher interest expense increased $50 thousand, or 3.1%, to approximately $1.7 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1, 2016 comparedDecember 16, 2015 related to accelerating deferred financing fees upon amending the three quarters ended May 6, 2015. This increase was due primarily to lower average debt balances offset by four additional weeks in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the three quarters ended May 6, 2015.2013 Credit Agreement.
 

Other Income, Net
 
Other income, net, consisted primarily of the following components: net rental property income and expenses relating to property for which we are the landlord; prepaid sales tax discounts earned through our participation in state tax prepayment programs; and oil and gas royalty income. Other income, net, in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 increased $64 thousandapproximately $0.2 million compared to the quarter ended May 6, 2015. Other income, net, in the quarter ended June 1, 2016 increased $68 thousand compared to the 12-week comparable period ended June 3,December 16, 2015 primarily due primarily to (1) higher net rental income and (2) a decrease in discounts related to the volume of sales of pre-paid gift cards. Other income, net, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 decreased approximately $0.3 million compared to the 40-week comparable period ended June 3, 2015 due primarily to (1) an increase in discounts related to a higher volume of sales of pre-paid gift cards and (2) lower net rental income.


Taxes
 
For the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, the income taxes related to continuing operations resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $0.6 million compared to a tax provision of approximately $0.4 million for the quarter ended May 6, 2015. For the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, the income taxes related to continuing operations resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $1.4$1.5 million compared to a tax benefit of approximately $1.3$0.7 million for the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. These tax benefits were due to the loss before taxes and discontinued operations in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 and in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015.

 
Discontinued Operations
 
IncomeLoss from discontinued operations was $13$72 thousand in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to a loss of approximately $131$72 thousand in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. IncomeLoss from discontinued operations of $13$72 thousand in the quarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 consisted of a $25 thousand gain from the disposal of discontinued assets, offset by $9$7 thousand in carrying costs associated with assets related to discontinued operations and a $65 thousand tax provision of $3 thousand.provision. The loss from discontinued operations of approximately $131$72 thousand in the quarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015 consisted of approximately $143$118 thousand in carrying costs associated with assets related to discontinued a $90 thousand impairment of discontinued assets, and a $2 thousand loss on the the disposal of discontinued assets, offset by an approximate $104a $46 thousand tax benefit.

Loss from discontinued operations was $77 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to a loss of approximately $0.3 million in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015. Loss from discontinued operations of $77 thousand in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 consisted of approximately $156 thousand in carrying costs associated with assets related to discontinued operations offset by a $25 thousand gain from the disposal of discontinued assets and a tax benefit of $54 thousand. The loss from discontinued operations of approximately $0.3 million in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015 consisted of approximately $0.5 million in carrying costs associated with assets related to discontinued operations and an approximate $0.1 million impairment of discontinued assets, offset by an approximate $0.3 million tax benefit. 



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
General. Our primary sources of short-term and long-term liquidity are cash flows from operations, our Revolver (as defined below), and our revolving credit facility.Term Loan (as defined below). During the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, cash provided by operating activities was approximately $11.4$3.2 million and cash provided by financing activities was approximately $1.8 million offset by cash used in investing activities of approximately $10.0 million and cash used in financing activities of approximately $1.5$4.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreasedincreased approximately $0.1 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to approximately $1.2an approximate $0.1 million decreaseincrease in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. We plan to continue the level of capital and repair and maintenance expenditures necessary to keep our restaurants attractive and operating efficiently.
 
Our cash requirements consist principally of:
 
payments to reduce our debt;
capital expenditures for construction, restaurant renovations and upgrades, information technology and culinary contract services development; and
working capital primarily for our Company-owned restaurants and obligations under our Culinary Contract Services agreements.



As is common in the restaurant industry, we maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories, and our vendors grant trade credit for purchases such as food and supplies. However, higher levels of accounts receivable are typical for culinary contract services and franchises. We also continually invest in our business through the addition of new units and refurbishment of existing units, which are reflected as long-term assets. 

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:
 
Three Quarters EndedQuarter Ended
June 1,
2016
 May 6,
2015
December 21,
2016
 December 16,
2015
(40 weeks) (36 weeks)(16 weeks) (16 weeks)
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Total cash provided by (used in):      
Operating activities$11,408
 $4,161
$3,241
 $6,343
Investing activities(10,033) (11,237)(4,942) (3,796)
Financing activities(1,467) 5,862
1,775
 (2,467)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(92) $(1,214)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$74
 $80
 
Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities was approximately $11.4$3.2 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, an approximate $7.2$3.1 million increasedecrease from the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The $7.2$3.1 million increasedecrease in cash provided by operating activities is due to an approximate $3.4$4.3 million increasedecrease in cash provided by by operations before changes in operating assets and liabilities plusless an approximate $3.9$1.2 million decreaseincrease in cash used inprovided by changes in operating assets and liabilities for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016.
  
Cash generatedprovided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities was approximately $13.8$0.4 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, an approximate $3.4$4.3 million increasedecrease compared to the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The $3.4$4.3 million increasedecrease in cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to increased store leveldecreased store-level profit from our Company-owned restaurants, partially due to four additional operating weeks in the first three quarters fiscal 2016.restaurants.
 


Changes in operating assets and liabilities was an approximate $2.4$2.9 million usesource of cash in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and an approximate $6.3$1.7 million usesource of cash in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The $3.9$1.2 million decreaseincrease in the usesource of cash was due to differences in the change in asset and liability balances between the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Increases in current asset accounts are a use of cash while decreases in current asset accounts are a source of cash. During the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, the change in trade accounts and other receivables was an approximate $1.0$0.3 million usesource of cash which was an approximate $0.9 million$28 thousand greater usesource of cash than in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The change in food and supplies inventory during the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 was an approximate $0.5$0.4 million use of cash which was an approximate $1.7$0.5 million decrease from the sourceuse of cash in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. The change in prepaid expenses and other assets was an approximate $0.6$0.1 million use of cash during the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, which was an approximate $0.7$0.4 million decrease in the source of cash from the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015.
 
Increase in current liability accounts are a source of cash, while decreases in current liability accounts are a use of cash. During the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, changes in the balances of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities was an approximate $0.3$3.1 million usesource of cash, compared to a usesource of cash of approximately $7.4$2.0 million during the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015.
 
Investing Activities. We generally reinvest available cash flows from operations to develop new restaurants, maintain and enhance existing restaurants and support Culinary Contract Services. Cash used by investing activities was approximately $10.0$4.9 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and approximately $11.2$3.8 million in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Capital expenditures were approximately $14.4$5.0 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and approximately $16.4$5.7 million in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Proceeds from the disposal of assets were approximately $4.3$38 thousand in the quarter ended December 21, 2016 and approximately $1.9 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1, 2016 and approximately $5.1 million in the three quarters ended May 6,December 16, 2015.
 


Financing Activities. Cash used inprovided by financing activities was approximately $1.5$1.8 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to an approximate $5.9$2.5 million sourceuse of cash during the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. Cash flows from financing activities was primarily the result of borrowings and repayments related to the 2013 Credit Facility, our revolving credit facility.Revolver, and our Term Loan. During the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, cash provided by financing activities was approximately $2.4 million based on our total net borrowings. As a result of our first quarter 2017 refinancing, repayments on the 2013 Credit Facility and the Revolver exceeded borrowings by approximately $1.5$32.6 million and borrowing from the Term Loan provided $35.0 million. During the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015, borrowings exceeded repayments of the credit facility2013 Credit Facility by approximately $6.0$2.5 million.
 
Status of Long-Term Investments and Liquidity
 
At June 1,December 21, 2016, we did not hold any long-term investments.

Status of Trade Accounts and Other Receivables, Net
 
We monitor the aging of our receivables, including Fuddruckers franchising related receivables, and record provisions for uncollectable accounts, as appropriate. Credit terms of accounts receivable associated with our Culinary Contract ServicesCCS business vary from 30 to 45 days based on contract terms.
 
Working Capital
 
Current assets increased approximately $1.4$0.3 million in the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 compared to a decrease of approximately $2.1$0.2 million in the three quartersquarter ended May 6,December 16, 2015. In the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016, food and supplies inventory increased approximately $0.4 million, prepaid expenses increased approximately $0.1 million, and cash increased approximately $0.1 million partially offset by an approximate $0.3 million decrease in trade accounts and other receivables, net. In the quarter ended December 16, 2015, food and supplies inventory increased approximately $0.4 million and cash increased approximately $0.1 million partially offset by an approximate $0.5 million decrease in prepaid expenses and an approximate $0.2 million decrease in trade accounts and other receivables, net.
Current liabilities increased approximately $5.4 million in the quarter ended December 21, 2016 compared to a increase of approximately $2.2 million in the quarter ended December 16, 2015. In the quarter ended December 21, 2016, current portion of credit facility debt increased approximately $2.5 million, unredeemed gift cards increased approximately $1.5 million, salaries and incentives increased approximately $1.0 million, prepaid expensesaccrued taxes other than income taxes increased approximately $0.9 million and accrued professional fees increased approximately $0.5 million; partially offset by an approximate $0.1decreases in accounts payable of approximately $0.7 million, decrease in cash and cash equivalents. Food and supply inventory was unchanged in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to the three quarters ended May 6, 2015. In the three quarters ended May 6, 2015, cash decrease approximately $1.2 million, food and supply inventory decreased approximately $1.1 million; partially offset by increases in trade accounts and other receivables and prepaidoperating expenses of approximately $0.2 million and accrued claims and insurance of approximately $0.1 million, respectively.


Current liabilitiesmillion. In the quarter ended December 16, 2015, unredeemed gift cards increased approximately $0.3$1.4 million, in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 compared to a decrease of approximately $7.7 million in the three quarters ended May 6, 2015. In the three quarters ended June 1, 2016, unredeemed gift cardstaxes other than income taxes increased approximately $0.9 million, salaries and incentives increased approximately $0.9$0.8 million, and accrued claimsincome taxes and insuranceother increased approximately $0.2$0.6 million; partially offset by decreases in taxes other than income of approximately $1.0 million, accounts payable of approximately $0.5$1.3 million and accrued operating expenses of approximately $0.2 million. In the three quarters ended May 6, 2015, accounts payable decreased approximately $7.1 million, salaries and incentives decreased approximately $1.1 million, taxes other than income taxes decreased approximately $0.7 million, other operating expenses decreased approximately $0.3 million and income taxes, legal and other decreased approximately $0.2 million; partially offset by increases in unredeemed gift cards of approximately $1.6 million and accrued accrued claims and insurance of approximately $0.1 million.
 
Capital Expenditures
 
Capital expenditures consist of purchases of real estate for future restaurant sites, Culinary Contract Services investments, new unit construction, purchases of new and replacement restaurant furniture and equipment, and ongoing remodeling programs. Capital expenditures for the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 were approximately $14.4$5.0 million and related to recurring maintenance of our existing units, existing restaurant remodels and rollout of new point of sale and network equipment, improvement of our culinary contract services business and the development of future restaurant sites. We expect to be able to fund all capital expenditures in fiscal 20162017 using proceeds from the sale of assets, cash flows from operations and our available credit.2016 Credit Agreement. We expect to spend approximately $20.0$16.0 million on capital expenditures in fiscal 2016.2017.


DEBT

The following table summarizes Credit facility debt, less current portion at December 21, 2016 and August 31, 2016: 
  
 December 21,
2016
 August 31,
2016
 (In thousands)
2013 Credit Agreement - Revolver$
 $37,000
2016 Credit Agreement - Revolver4,400
 
2016 Credit Agreement - Term Loan35,000
 
Total credit facility debt39,400
 37,000
Less unamortized debt issue costs(328) 
Total credit facility debt, less unamortized debt issuance costs39,072
 37,000
Current portion of credit facility debt(2,450) 
Total$36,622
 $37,000

On November 8, 2016, we refinanced our 2013 Credit Facility (as defined below) with a new $65.0 million Senior Secured Credit Agreement. The refinancing resulted in a debt modification since the difference in the present values of the cash flow were less than 10%. The debt issue costs we incurred on the new 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below) financing amounted to $0.6 million of which $0.3 million was applicable to the Term Loan and was setup on a pro-rata basis as a liability, which is included in Credit facility debt, less current portion.
 
Senior Secured Credit Agreement
DEBTOn November 8, 2016, we entered into a $65.0 million Senior Secured Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and Cadence Bank, NA and Texas Capital Bank, NA, as lenders (“2016 Credit Agreement”). The 2016 Credit Agreement is comprised of a $30.0 million 5-year Revolver (the “Revolver”) and a $35.0 million 5-year Term Loan (the “Term Loan”). The maturity date of the 2016 Credit Agreement is November 8, 2021. For this section of this Form 10-Q, capitalized terms that are used but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the 2016 Credit Agreement.
The Term Loan and/or Revolver commitments may be increased by up to an additional $10.0 million in the aggregate.
The 2016 Credit Agreement also provides for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to the lesser of $5.0 million and the Revolving Credit Commitment, which is $30.0 million as of December 21, 2016. The 2016 Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of the Company’s present subsidiaries and will be guaranteed by our future subsidiaries.
At any time throughout the term of the 2016 Credit Agreement, we have the option to elect one of two bases of interest rates. One interest rate option is the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) 30-day LIBOR plus 1%, plus, in each case, the Applicable Margin, which ranges from 1.50% to 2.50% per annum. The other interest rate option is the LIBOR plus the Applicable Margin, which ranges from 2.50% to 3.50% per annum. The Applicable Margin under each option is dependent upon our Consolidated Total Lease Adjusted Leverage Ratio ("CTLAL") at the most recent quarterly determination date.
The Term Loan amortizes 7.0% per year (35.0% in 5 years) which includes the quarterly payment of principal. On December 14, 2016, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $17.5 million, representing 50% of the initial outstanding Term Loan.
We are obligated to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each lender a quarterly commitment fee based on the average daily unused amount of the commitment of such lender, ranging from 0.30% to 0.35% per annum depending on the CTLAL at the most recent quarterly determination date.
The proceeds of the 2016 Credit Agreement are available for us to (i) pay in full all indebtedness outstanding under the 2013 Credit Agreement as of November 8, 2016, (ii) pay fees, commissions, and expenses in connection with our repayment of the 2013 Credit Agreement, initial extensions of credit under the 2016 Credit Agreement, and (iii) for working capital and general corporate purposes of the Company.


The 2016 Credit Agreement contains the following covenants among others:
CTLAL of not more than (i) 5.00 to 1.00, at the end of each fiscal quarter, through and including the third fiscal quarter of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2018, and (ii) 4.75 to 1.00 thereafter,
Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00, at the end of each fiscal quarter,
Limit on Growth Capital Expenditures so long as the CTLAL is at least 0.25 to 1.00 less than the then-applicable permitted maximum CTLAL,
restrictions on mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, and asset sales,
restrictions on the payment of dividends, redemption of stock, and other distributions,
restrictions on incurring indebtedness, including certain guarantees, and capital lease obligations,
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of our property and the property of our subsidiaries,
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing our business,
restrictions on making certain investments, loans, advances, and guarantees,
restrictions on selling assets outside the ordinary course of business,
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions, and
restrictions on certain acquisitions of all or a substantial portion of the assets, property and/or equity interests of any person, including share repurchases and dividends.

The 2016 Credit Agreement is secured by an all asset lien on all of our real property and also includes customary events of default. If a default occurs and is continuing, the lenders’ commitments under the 2016 Credit Agreement may be immediately terminated, and, or we may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement.
As of December 21, 2016, we had $39.4 million in total outstanding loans and approximately $1.3 million committed under letters of credit, which we use as security for the payment of insurance obligations, and approximately $0.3 million in other indebtedness.
We were in compliance with the covenants contained in the 2016 Credit Agreement as of December 21, 2016 and after applying the CTLAL, the available borrowing capacity was $7.3 million. At any determination date, if certain leverage and fixed charge ratios exceed the maximum permitted under our 2016 Credit Agreement, we would be considered in default under the terms of the agreement. Due to negative results in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, continued under performance in the current fiscal year could cause our financial ratios to exceed the permitted limits under the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement.
2013 Credit Facility
 
In August 2013, we entered into a $70.0 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and ZB, N.A. dba Amegy Bank (formerly Amegy Bank, N.A.), as Syndication Agent. Pursuant to the October 2, 2015 amendment, the total aggregate amount of the lenders’lenders' commitments was lowered to $60.0 million from $70.0 million. The following description summarizes the material terms of the revolving credit facility, as subsequently amended on March 21, 2014, November 7, 2014 and October 2, 2015, (the revolving credit facility is referred to as the “2013 Credit Facility”). The 2013 Credit Facility is governed by the credit agreement dated as of August 14, 2013 (the “2013 Credit Agreement”) among us, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and ZB, N.A. dba Amegy Bank (formerly Amegy Bank, N.A.), as Syndication Agent. The maturity date of the 2013 Credit Facility iswas September 1, 2017. In addition to the $60.0 million commitment under the 2013 Credit Agreement, it may be increased to a maximum commitment of $80.0 million.
 
The 2013 Credit Facility also providesprovided for the issuance of letters of credit in a maximum aggregate amount of $5.0 million outstanding as of August 14, 2013 and $15.0 million outstanding at any one time with prior written consent of the Administrative Agent and the Issuing Bank. The 2013 Credit Facility is guaranteed by all of our present subsidiaries and will be guaranteed by our future subsidiaries.
At June 1, 2016, after applying the Lease Adjusted Leverage Ratio Limitation, the available borrowing capacity was $18.2 million.

At any time throughout the term of the 2013 Credit Facility, we havehad the option to elect one of two basisbases of interest rates. One interest rate option iswas the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (b) prime plus, in either case, an applicable spread that rangesranged from 0.75% to 2.25% per annum. The other interest rate option is the London InterBank Offered Rate plus a spread that rangesranged from 2.50% to 4.00% per annum. The applicable spread under each option is dependent upon the ratio of our debt to EBITDA at the most recent determination date.
 
We arewere obligated to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each lender a quarterly commitment fee based on the average daily unused amount of the commitment of such lender, ranging from 0.30% to 0.40% per annum depending on the Total Leverage Ratio at the most recent determination date.
 
The proceeds of the 2013 Credit Facility arewere available for our general corporate purposes, and general working capital purposes and capital expenditures.

Borrowings under the 2013 Credit Facility are subject to mandatory repayment with the proceeds of sales of certain of our real property, subject to certain exceptions.
 


The 2013 Credit Agreement, as amended, containscontained the following covenants among others:

Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than (i) 1.10 to 1.00 at all times during the first, second and third fiscal quarters of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2015, (ii) 1.25 to 1.00 at all times during the fourth fiscal quarter of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2015, and (iii) 1.50 to 1.00 at all times thereafter,
Lease Adjusted Leverage Ratio of not more than (i) 5.75 to 1.00 at all times during the first, second and third fiscal quarters of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2015, (ii) 5.50 to 1.00 at all times during the fourth fiscal quarter of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2015, (iii) 5.25 to 1.00 at all times during the first fiscal quarter of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2016, (iv) 5.00 to 1.00 at all times during the second fiscal quarter of the Borrower’s fiscal year 2016, and (v) 4.75 to 1.00 at all times thereafter,
capital expenditures limited to $25.0 million per year, 
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of our property and the property of our subsidiaries,
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing our business,
restrictions on making certain investments, loans, advances and guarantees,
restrictions on selling assets outside the ordinary course of business,
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions, and
restrictions on certain acquisitions of all or a substantial portion of the assets, property and/or equity interests of any person, including share repurchases and dividends.
  
The 2013 Credit Agreement also includesincluded customary events of default. If a default occursoccurred and iswas continuing, the lenders’ commitments under the 2013 Credit Facility may behave been immediately terminated and/and, or we may becould have been required to repay all amounts outstanding under the 2013 Credit Facility.

The 2013 Credit Facility iswas secured by a perfected first priority lien on certain of our real property and all of the material personal property owned by us or any of our subsidiaries, other than certain excluded assets (as defined in the Credit Agreement). At June 1, 2016, the carrying value of the collateral securing the 2013 Credit Facility was $116.3 million.

As of June 1, 2016, we had $36.0 million in outstanding loans and $1.3 million committed under letters of credit, which were issued as security for the payment of insurance obligations and $0.4 million in capital lease commitments.

We were in compliance with the covenants contained in the 2013 Credit Agreement, as amended, as of June 1, 2016.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Form 10-Q were prepared in conformity with GAAP. Preparation of the financial statements requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Due to the significant, subjective and complex judgments and estimates used when preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, management regularly reviews these assumptions and estimates with the Finance and Audit Committee of our Board. Management believes the following are critical accounting policies used in the preparation of these financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates, including our estimates of future cash flows, which are subject to the current economic environment and changes in estimates. We had no changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates which were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2015.31, 2016.   
 


NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. It also addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations guidance in GAAP. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update provides a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. This update is effective for annual and interimreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early application is not permitted. This update permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Further, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the guidance in ASU No. 2014–09 for evaluating when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies the guidance in ASU No. 2014–09 regarding assessing whether promises to transfer goods or services are distinct, and whether an entity's promise to grant a license provides a customer with a right to use or right to access the entity's intellectual property. The Company plans to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which is the first fiscal quarter of the annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017. We have not yet decided on a method of transition upon adoption. The Company expects the pronouncement may impact the recognition of the initial franchise fee, which is currently recognized upon the opening of a franchise restaurant. We are further evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We are evaluating the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and have not yet selected a transition method.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No 2014-15. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, after December 31, 2016. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). This update requires inventory within the scope of the standard to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Topic 740). This update requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a corresponding right-of-use asset. The update also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using2020. This standard requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective approach. Earlytransition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with optional practical expedients. Based on a preliminary assessment, the Company expects that most of its operating lease commitments will be subject to the new guidance and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right–of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in a significant increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company is permitted. We are evaluating the impactcontinuing its assessment, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements and have not yet selected a transition method.related disclosures.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). This update was issued as part of the FASB’s simplification initiative and affects all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The amendments in this update cover such areas as the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies, the classification of those excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, an accounting policy election for forfeitures, the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes and still qualify for equity classification and the classification of those taxes paid on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and have not yet selected a transition method.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016–04, “Liabilities – Extinguishment of Liabilities: Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored–Value Products,” which is intended to eliminate current and future diversity in practice related to derecognition of prepaid stored–value product liability in a way that aligns with the new revenue recognition guidance. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017; however, early application is permitted. We are are evaluating the impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This update provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payment are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
INFLATION
 
It is generally our policy to maintain stable menu prices without regard to seasonal variations in food costs. Certain increases in costs of food, wages, supplies, transportation and services may require us to increase our menu prices from time to time. To the extent prevailing market conditions allow, we intend to adjust menu prices to maintain profit margins.
 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Form 10-Q contains statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements contained in this Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements for purposes of these provisions, including any statements regarding:
 
future operating results,
future capital expenditures and expected sources of funds for capital expenditures,
future debt, including liquidity and the sources and availability of funds related to debt, and expected repayment of debt, as well as our ability to refinance the existing credit facility or enter into a new credit facility on a timely basis,
expected sources of funds for working capital requirements,
plans for our new prototype restaurants,
plans for expansion of our business,
scheduled openings of new units,
closing existing units,
future sales of assets and the gains or losses that may be recognized as a result of any such sales, and
continued compliance with the terms of our 20132016 Credit Facility, as amended.Facility.



In some cases, investors can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “may,” “should,” “will,” and “would” or similar words. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by management in light of its experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes are relevant. Although management believes that its assumptions are reasonable based on information currently available, those assumptions are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of its control. The following factors, as well as the factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 201531, 2016 and any other cautionary language in this Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties, and events that may cause our financial and operational results to differ materially from the expectations described in our forward-looking statements:
 
general business and economic conditions,
the impact of competition,
our operating initiatives, changes in promotional, couponing and advertising strategies and the success of management’s business plans,
fluctuations in the costs of commodities, including beef, poultry, seafood, dairy, cheese, oils and produce,
ability to raise menu prices and customer acceptance of changes in menu items,
increases in utility costs, including the costs of natural gas and other energy supplies,
changes in the availability and cost of labor, including the ability to attract qualified managers and team members,
the seasonality of the business,
collectability of accounts receivable,
changes in governmental regulations, including changes in minimum wages and health care benefit regulation,
the effects of inflation and changes in our customers’ disposable income, spending trends and habits,
the ability to realize property values,
the availability and cost of credit,
the ability to effectively integrate and improve the profitability of the acquired Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants,
effectiveness of the Cheeseburger in Paradise conversions to Fuddruckers restaurants,
the effectiveness of our credit card controls and PCI compliance,
weather conditions in the regions in which our restaurants operate,
costs relating to legal proceedings,
impact of adoption of new accounting standards,
effects of actual or threatened future terrorist attacks in the United States,
unfavorable publicity relating to operations, including publicity concerning food quality, illness or other health concerns or labor relations, and
the continued service of key management personnel.

Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors should be aware that the occurrence of the events described above and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q could have material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.  



Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are exposed to marketinterest rate risk fromdue to changes in interest rates affecting our variable-rate debt.debt, Term Loan and borrowings under our 2016 Revolver. As of June 1,December 21, 2016, the total amount of debt subject to interest rate fluctuations outstanding under our 2013 Credit FacilityRevolver and Term Loan was $36.0$21.9 million. Assuming an average debt balance with interest rate exposure of $36.0$21.9 million, a 1.0%100 basis point increase in prevailing interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by $0.4$0.2 million.
We are not currently using The interest rate swaps to manage interest risk on our variable-rate debt.remaining $17.5 million in outstanding debt is fixed plus an applicable margin based on our CTLAL at each determination date, beginning December 14, 2016, under the terms of our interest rate swap agreement.
 
We have exposure to various foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations for revenues generated by our operations outside of the United States, which can adversely impact our net income and cash flows. Sales to customers and royalties from franchisees outside the contiguous United States as a percentage of our total revenues was approximately 0.12%0.07% and 0.10%0.13% in the quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 and May 6,December 16, 2015, respectively, and 0.14% and 0.12% in the three quarters ended June 1, 2016 and May 6, 2015, respectively. All of this business is conducted in the local currency of the country in which the franchise operates. We do not enter into financial instruments to manage this foreign currency exchange risk.

Many ingredients in the products sold in our restaurants are commodities subject to unpredictable price fluctuations. We attempt to minimize price volatility by negotiating fixed price contracts for the supply of key ingredients and in some cases by passing increased commodity costs through to the customer by adjusting menu prices or menu offerings. Our ingredients are available from multiple suppliers so we are not dependent on a single vendor for our ingredients.
 


Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of June 1,December 21, 2016. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 1,December 21, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting 
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three quartersquarter ended June 1,December 21, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



Part II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings as disclosed in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2015.31, 2016.
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
There have been no material changes during the threeone quarters ended June 1,December 21, 2016 to the Risk Factors discussed in Item1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2015.31, 2016.
 
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, among the Company, the other credit parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cadence Bank, N.A. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, swingline lender, issuing lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2016 (File No. 001-08308)).
10.2First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2017, among the Company, the other credit parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cadence Bank, N.A. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, swingline lender, issuing lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner.
31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.1Section 1350 certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.2Section 1350 certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
  
101.SCHXBRL Schema Document
  
101.CALXBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
  
101.DEFXBRL Definition Linkbase Document
  
101.LABXBRL Label Linkbase Document
  
101.PREXBRL Presentation Linkbase Document


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
LUBY’S, INC.
(Registrant)
       
Date:7/11/20162/3/2017By:/s/ Christopher J. Pappas
     Christopher J. Pappas
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)
       
Date:7/11/20162/3/2017By:/s/ K. Scott Gray
     K. Scott Gray
     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


EXHIBIT INDEX  
10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, among the Company, the other credit parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cadence Bank, N.A. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, swingline lender, issuing lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2016 (File No. 001-08308)).
10.2First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2017, among the Company, the other credit parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cadence Bank, N.A. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, swingline lender, issuing lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner.
31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1Section 1350 certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2Section 1350 certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCHXBRL Schema Document
   
101.CALXBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
   
101.DEFXBRL Definition Linkbase Document
   
101.LABXBRL Label Linkbase Document
   
101.PREXBRL Presentation Linkbase Document


4544