0000019617 us-gaap:AssetsMembersrt:WeightedAverageMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-07-01 2018-09-30CorporateDebtSecuritiesMember jpm:MeasurementInputPricePerUnitMember us-gaap:MarketApproachValuationTechniqueMember 2020-03-31 0000019617 stpr:NJ us-gaap:FinancialAssetAcquiredWithCreditDeteriorationMember jpm:ConsumerExcludingCreditCardLoanPortfolioSegmentMember us-gaap:AdjustableRateResidentialMortgageMember 2019-09-30 0000019617 jpm:RefreshedFicoScoresLessThan660Member jpm:ConsumerExcludingCreditCardLoanPortfolioSegmentMember jpm:HomeEquityLoanandHomeEquityLineofCreditMember us-gaap:Ltv80To100PercentMember 2019-09-30 0000019617 jpm:SeriesXPreferredStockMember 2018-12-31CreditCardReceivablesMember 2019-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
| | | | |
For the quarterly period ended | | Commission file | |
September 30, 2019March 31, 2020
| | number | 1-5805 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | | |
Delaware | | 13-2624428 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
| | | |
383 Madison Avenue, | | |
New York, | New York | | 10179 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 270-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common stock | JPM | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 5.45% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series P | JPM PR A | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 6.125% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Y | JPM PR F | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 6.10% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series AA | JPM PR G | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 6.15% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series BB | JPM PR H | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 5.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series DD | JPM PR D | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 6.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series EE | JPM PR C | The New York Stock Exchange |
Depositary Shares, each representing a one-four hundredth interest in a share of 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG | JPM PR J | The New York Stock Exchange |
Alerian MLP Index ETNs due May 24, 2024 | AMJ | NYSE Arca, Inc. |
Guarantee of Callable Step-Up Fixed Rate Notes due April 26, 2028 of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC | JPM/28 | The New York Stock Exchange |
Guarantee of Cushing 30 MLP Index ETNs due June 15, 2037 of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC | PPLN | NYSE Arca, Inc. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | ☒
| Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
| | | |
| | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
| | | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2019: 3,136,484,924March 31, 2020: 3,047,022,877
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | | |
| Page |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | 80 |
| | 81 |
| | 82 |
| | 83 |
| | 84 |
| | 85 |
| | 165169 |
| | 166170 |
| | 168171 |
Item 2. | | |
| | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 5 |
| | 1012 |
| | 15 |
| | 18 |
| | 19 |
| | 21 |
| | 4438 |
| | 4539 |
| | 5045 |
| | 5652 |
| | 6056 |
| | 6966 |
| | 7067 |
| | 7572 |
| | 73 |
| | 74 |
| | 7675 |
| | 78 |
| | 79 |
Item 3. | | 176180 |
Item 4. | | 176180 |
| |
Item 1. | | 176180 |
Item 1A. | | 176180 |
Item 2. | | 176181 |
Item 3. | | 177182 |
Item 4. | | 177182 |
Item 5. | | 177182 |
Item 6. | | 177182 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated financial highlights (unaudited)
| | As of or for the period ended, (in millions, except per share, ratio, headcount data and where otherwise noted)
| As of or for the period ended, (in millions, except per share, ratio, headcount data and where otherwise noted)
| | | Nine months ended Sept. 30, | As of or for the period ended, (in millions, except per share, ratio, headcount data and where otherwise noted)
| |
3Q19 |
| 2Q19 |
| 1Q19 |
| 4Q18 |
| 3Q18 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 1Q20 |
| 4Q19 |
| 3Q19 |
| 2Q19 |
| 1Q19 |
|
Selected income statement data | Selected income statement data | | | | Selected income statement data | |
Total net revenue | Total net revenue | $ | 29,341 |
| $ | 28,832 |
| $ | 29,123 |
| $ | 26,109 |
| $ | 27,260 |
| | $ | 87,296 |
| $ | 82,920 |
| Total net revenue | $ | 28,251 |
| $ | 28,331 |
| $ | 29,341 |
| $ | 28,832 |
| $ | 29,123 |
|
Total noninterest expense | Total noninterest expense | 16,422 |
| 16,341 |
| 16,395 |
| 15,720 |
| 15,623 |
| | 49,158 |
| 47,674 |
| Total noninterest expense | 16,850 |
| 16,339 |
| 16,422 |
| 16,341 |
| 16,395 |
|
Pre-provision profit(a) | Pre-provision profit(a) | 12,919 |
| 12,491 |
| 12,728 |
| 10,389 |
| 11,637 |
| | 38,138 |
| 35,246 |
| Pre-provision profit(a) | 11,401 |
| 11,992 |
| 12,919 |
| 12,491 |
| 12,728 |
|
Provision for credit losses | Provision for credit losses | 1,514 |
| 1,149 |
| 1,495 |
| 1,548 |
| 948 |
| | 4,158 |
| 3,323 |
| Provision for credit losses | 8,285 |
| 1,427 |
| 1,514 |
| 1,149 |
| 1,495 |
|
Income before income tax expense | Income before income tax expense | 11,405 |
| 11,342 |
| 11,233 |
| 8,841 |
| 10,689 |
| | 33,980 |
| 31,923 |
| Income before income tax expense | 3,116 |
| 10,565 |
| 11,405 |
| 11,342 |
| 11,233 |
|
Income tax expense | Income tax expense | 2,325 |
| 1,690 |
| 2,054 |
| 1,775 |
| 2,309 |
| | 6,069 |
| 6,515 |
| Income tax expense | 251 |
| 2,045 |
| 2,325 |
| 1,690 |
| 2,054 |
|
Net income | Net income | $ | 9,080 |
| $ | 9,652 |
| $ | 9,179 |
| $ | 7,066 |
| $ | 8,380 |
| | $ | 27,911 |
| $ | 25,408 |
| Net income | $ | 2,865 |
| $ | 8,520 |
| $ | 9,080 |
| $ | 9,652 |
| $ | 9,179 |
|
| | | |
Earnings per share data | Earnings per share data | | | | Earnings per share data | |
Net income: Basic | Net income: Basic | $ | 2.69 |
| $ | 2.83 |
| $ | 2.65 |
| $ | 1.99 |
| $ | 2.35 |
| | $ | 8.17 |
| $ | 7.04 |
| Net income: Basic | $ | 0.79 |
| $ | 2.58 |
| $ | 2.69 |
| $ | 2.83 |
| $ | 2.65 |
|
Diluted | Diluted | 2.68 |
| 2.82 |
| 2.65 |
| 1.98 |
| 2.34 |
| | 8.15 |
| 7.00 |
| Diluted | 0.78 |
| 2.57 |
| 2.68 |
| 2.82 |
| 2.65 |
|
Average shares: Basic | Average shares: Basic | 3,198.5 |
| 3,250.6 |
| 3,298.0 |
| 3,335.8 |
| 3,376.1 |
| | 3,248.7 |
| 3,416.5 |
| Average shares: Basic | 3,095.8 |
| 3,140.7 |
| 3,198.5 |
| 3,250.6 |
| 3,298.0 |
|
Diluted | Diluted | 3,207.2 |
| 3,259.7 |
| 3,308.2 |
| 3,347.3 |
| 3,394.3 |
| | 3,258.0 |
| 3,436.2 |
| Diluted | 3,100.7 |
| 3,148.5 |
| 3,207.2 |
| 3,259.7 |
| 3,308.2 |
|
| | | |
Market and per common share data | Market and per common share data | | | | Market and per common share data | |
Market capitalization | Market capitalization | 369,133 |
| 357,479 |
| 328,387 |
| 319,780 |
| 375,239 |
| | 369,133 |
| 375,239 |
| Market capitalization | 274,323 |
| 429,913 |
| 369,133 |
| 357,479 |
| 328,387 |
|
Common shares at period-end | Common shares at period-end | 3,136.5 |
| 3,197.5 |
| 3,244.0 |
| 3,275.8 |
| 3,325.4 |
| | 3,136.5 |
| 3,325.4 |
| Common shares at period-end | 3,047.0 |
| 3,084.0 |
| 3,136.5 |
| 3,197.5 |
| 3,244.0 |
|
Book value per share | Book value per share | 75.24 |
| 73.88 |
| 71.78 |
| 70.35 |
| 69.52 |
| | 75.24 |
| 69.52 |
| Book value per share | 75.88 |
| 75.98 |
| 75.24 |
| 73.88 |
| 71.78 |
|
Tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”)(a) | Tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”)(a) | 60.48 |
| 59.52 |
| 57.62 |
| 56.33 |
| 55.68 |
| | 60.48 |
| 55.68 |
| Tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”)(a) | 60.71 |
| 60.98 |
| 60.48 |
| 59.52 |
| 57.62 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share | Cash dividends declared per share | 0.90 |
| 0.80 |
| 0.80 |
| 0.80 |
| 0.80 |
| | 2.50 |
| 1.92 |
| Cash dividends declared per share | 0.90 |
| 0.90 |
| 0.90 |
| 0.80 |
| 0.80 |
|
| | | |
Selected ratios and metrics | Selected ratios and metrics | | | | Selected ratios and metrics | |
Return on common equity (“ROE”)(b) | Return on common equity (“ROE”)(b) | 15 | % | 16 | % | 16 | % | 12 | % | 14 | % | | 15 | % | 14 | % | Return on common equity (“ROE”)(b) | 4 | % | 14 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % | 16 | % |
Return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”)(a)(b) | Return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”)(a)(b) | 18 |
| 20 |
| 19 |
| 14 |
| 17 |
| | 19 |
| 18 |
| Return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”)(a)(b) | 5 |
| 17 |
| 18 |
| 20 |
| 19 |
|
Return on assets(b) | Return on assets(b) | 1.30 |
| 1.41 |
| 1.39 |
| 1.06 |
| 1.28 |
| | 1.37 |
| 1.31 |
| Return on assets(b) | 0.40 |
| 1.22 |
| 1.30 |
| 1.41 |
| 1.39 |
|
Overhead ratio | Overhead ratio | 56 |
| 57 |
| 56 |
| 60 |
| 57 |
| | 56 |
| 57 |
| Overhead ratio | 60 |
| 58 |
| 56 |
| 57 |
| 56 |
|
Loans-to-deposits ratio | Loans-to-deposits ratio | 62 |
| 63 |
| 64 |
| 67 |
| 65 |
| | 62 |
| 65 |
| Loans-to-deposits ratio | 55 |
| 61 |
| 62 |
| 63 |
| 64 |
|
Liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) (average) | Liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) (average) | 115 |
| 113 |
| 111 |
| 113 |
| 115 |
| | 115 |
| 115 |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) (average) | 114 |
| 116 |
| 115 |
| 113 |
| 111 |
|
Common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio(c) | Common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio(c) | 12.3 |
| 12.2 |
| 12.1 |
| 12.0 |
| 12.0 |
| | 12.3 |
| 12.0 |
| Common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio(c) | 11.5 |
| 12.4 |
| 12.3 |
| 12.2 |
| 12.1 |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio(c) | Tier 1 capital ratio(c) | 14.1 |
| 14.0 |
| 13.8 |
| 13.7 |
| 13.6 |
| | 14.1 |
| 13.6 |
| Tier 1 capital ratio(c) | 13.3 |
| 14.1 |
| 14.1 |
| 14.0 |
| 13.8 |
|
Total capital ratio(c) | Total capital ratio(c) | 15.9 |
| 15.8 |
| 15.7 |
| 15.5 |
| 15.4 |
| | 15.9 |
| 15.4 |
| Total capital ratio(c) | 15.5 |
| 16.0 |
| 15.9 |
| 15.8 |
| 15.7 |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio(c) | Tier 1 leverage ratio(c) | 7.9 |
| 8.0 |
| 8.1 |
| 8.1 |
| 8.2 |
| | 7.9 |
| 8.2 |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio(c) | 7.5 |
| 7.9 |
| 7.9 |
| 8.0 |
| 8.1 |
|
Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”) | 6.3 |
| 6.4 |
| 6.4 |
| 6.4 |
| 6.5 |
| | 6.3 |
| 6.5 |
| |
Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”)(c) | | Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”)(c) | 6.0 |
| 6.3 |
| 6.3 |
| 6.4 |
| 6.4 |
|
| | | |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | |
Trading assets | Trading assets | $ | 495,875 |
| $ | 523,373 |
| $ | 533,402 |
| $ | 413,714 |
| $ | 419,827 |
| | $ | 495,875 |
| $ | 419,827 |
| Trading assets | $ | 548,580 |
| $ | 411,103 |
| $ | 495,875 |
| $ | 523,373 |
| $ | 533,402 |
|
Investment securities | 394,251 |
| 307,264 |
| 267,365 |
| 261,828 |
| 231,398 |
| | 394,251 |
| 231,398 |
| |
Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses | | Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses | 471,144 |
| 398,239 |
| 394,251 |
| 307,264 |
| 267,365 |
|
Loans | Loans | 945,218 |
| 956,889 |
| 956,245 |
| 984,554 |
| 954,318 |
| | 945,218 |
| 954,318 |
| Loans | 1,015,375 |
| 959,769 |
| 945,218 |
| 956,889 |
| 956,245 |
|
Core loans | 899,572 |
| 908,971 |
| 905,943 |
| 931,856 |
| 899,006 |
| | 899,572 |
| 899,006 |
| |
Average core loans | 900,567 |
| 905,786 |
| 916,567 |
| 907,271 |
| 894,279 |
| | 907,581 |
| 877,774 |
| |
Total assets | Total assets | 2,764,661 |
| 2,727,379 |
| 2,737,188 |
| 2,622,532 |
| 2,615,183 |
| | 2,764,661 |
| 2,615,183 |
| Total assets | 3,139,431 |
| 2,687,379 |
| 2,764,661 |
| 2,727,379 |
| 2,737,188 |
|
Deposits | Deposits | 1,525,261 |
| 1,524,361 |
| 1,493,441 |
| 1,470,666 |
| 1,458,762 |
| | 1,525,261 |
| 1,458,762 |
| Deposits | 1,836,009 |
| 1,562,431 |
| 1,525,261 |
| 1,524,361 |
| 1,493,441 |
|
Long-term debt | Long-term debt | 296,472 |
| 288,869 |
| 290,893 |
| 282,031 |
| 270,124 |
| | 296,472 |
| 270,124 |
| Long-term debt | 299,344 |
| 291,498 |
| 296,472 |
| 288,869 |
| 290,893 |
|
Common stockholders’ equity | Common stockholders’ equity | 235,985 |
| 236,222 |
| 232,844 |
| 230,447 |
| 231,192 |
| | 235,985 |
| 231,192 |
| Common stockholders’ equity | 231,199 |
| 234,337 |
| 235,985 |
| 236,222 |
| 232,844 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | Total stockholders’ equity | 264,348 |
| 263,215 |
| 259,837 |
| 256,515 |
| 258,956 |
| | 264,348 |
| 258,956 |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 261,262 |
| 261,330 |
| 264,348 |
| 263,215 |
| 259,837 |
|
Headcount | Headcount | 257,444 |
| 254,983 |
| 255,998 |
| 256,105 |
| 255,313 |
| | 257,444 |
| 255,313 |
| Headcount | 256,720 |
| 256,981 |
| 257,444 |
| 254,983 |
| 255,998 |
|
| | | |
Credit quality metrics | Credit quality metrics | | | | Credit quality metrics | |
Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,400 |
| $ | 14,295 |
| $ | 14,591 |
| $ | 14,500 |
| $ | 14,225 |
| | $ | 14,400 |
| $ | 14,225 |
| |
Allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments | | Allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments | $ | 25,391 |
| $ | 14,314 |
| $ | 14,400 |
| $ | 14,295 |
| $ | 14,591 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans | Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans | 1.42 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.39 | % | | 1.42 | % | 1.39 | % | Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans | 2.32 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.43 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans excluding purchased credit-impaired loans(d) | 1.32 |
| 1.28 |
| 1.28 |
| 1.23 |
| 1.23 |
| | 1.32 |
| 1.23 |
| |
Nonperforming assets | Nonperforming assets | $ | 5,343 |
| $ | 5,260 |
| $ | 5,616 |
| $ | 5,190 |
| $ | 5,034 |
| | $ | 5,343 |
| $ | 5,034 |
| Nonperforming assets | $ | 6,421 |
| $ | 4,497 |
| $ | 5,343 |
| $ | 5,260 |
| $ | 5,616 |
|
Net charge-offs | Net charge-offs | 1,371 |
| 1,403 |
| 1,361 |
| 1,236 |
| 1,033 |
| | 4,135 |
| 3,620 |
| Net charge-offs | 1,469 |
| 1,494 |
| 1,371 |
| 1,403 |
| 1,361 |
|
Net charge-off rate | Net charge-off rate | 0.58 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.43 | % | | 0.59 | % | 0.52 | % | Net charge-off rate | 0.62 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.58 | % |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“CECL”) accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
| |
(a) | Pre-provision profit, TBVPS and ROTCE are each non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 19–20 for a further discussion of these measures. |
| |
(b) | Quarterly ratios are based upon annualized amounts. |
| |
(c) | The Basel III capital rules became fully phased-in effective January 1, 2019. During 2018,As of March 31, 2020, the required capital measures were subject toreflect the transitional rules and as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, were the same on a fully phased-in and on a transitional basis.CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Key performance measures on page 59 and Capital Risk Management on pages 85-9485-92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K and pages 45–4939–44 of this Form 10-Q for additional information on these measures. |
| |
(d) | Excludes the impact of residential real estate purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans, a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 19–20, and the Allowance for credit losses on pages 67–68 for a further discussion of these measures. |
The following is Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan Chase” or the “Firm”) for the thirdfirst quarter of 2019.2020.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirdfirst quarter of 20192020 (“Form 10-Q”) should be read together with JPMorgan Chase’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182019 (“20182019 Form 10-K”). Refer to the Glossary of terms and acronyms and line of business (“LOB”) metrics on pages 168–175171–179 for definitions of terms and acronyms used throughout this Form 10-Q.
This document contains forward-looking statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorgan Chase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-looking Statements on page 79 of this Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A, Risk factors, on pages 7–28 of the 2018 Form 10-K forFor a further discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the factors that could cause JPMorgan Chase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties.uncertainties, refer to Forward-looking Statements on page 79 of this Form 10-Q, Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors on pages 180-181 of this Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A, Risk factors, on pages 6-28 of the 2019 Form 10-K.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest banking institutions in the United States of America (“U.S.”), with operations worldwide; JPMorgan Chase had $2.8$3.1 trillion in assets and $264.3$261.3 billion in stockholders’
equity as of September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and
small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands, the Firm serves millions of customers in the U.S. and many of the world’s most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients.
JPMorgan Chase’s principal bank subsidiary is JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.”), a national banking association with U.S. branches in 3238 states and Washington, D.C. as of September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. JPMorgan Chase’s principal nonbanknon-bank subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan Securities”), a U.S. broker-dealer. The bank and non-bank subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase operate nationally as well as through overseas branches and subsidiaries, representative offices and subsidiary foreign banks. The Firm’s principal operating subsidiary inoutside the United Kingdom (“U.K.”)U.S. is J.P. Morgan Securities plc, a U.K.-based subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
For management reporting purposes, the Firm’s activities are organized into four major reportable business segments, as well as a Corporate segment. The Firm’s consumer business segment is Consumer & Community Banking (“CCB”). The Firm’s wholesale business segments are Corporate & Investment Bank (“CIB”), Commercial Banking (“CB”), and Asset & Wealth Management (“AWM”). Refer to Note 31 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K forFor a description of the Firm’s business segments and the products and services they provide to their respective
client bases.
bases, refer to Note 26 of this Form 10-Q and Note 32 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K.
This executive overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and does not contain all of the information that is important to readers of this Form 10-Q. For a complete description of the trends and uncertainties, as well as the risks and critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm and its various lines of business,LOBs, this Form 10-Q and the 20182019 Form 10-K should be read together and in their entirety.
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
| | Financial performance of JPMorgan Chase | Financial performance of JPMorgan Chase | | | | | | | | | Financial performance of JPMorgan Chase | | |
(unaudited) As of or for the period ended, (in millions, except per share data and ratios) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Selected income statement data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | $ | 29,341 |
| | $ | 27,260 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 87,296 |
| | $ | 82,920 |
| | 5 | % | $ | 28,251 |
| | $ | 29,123 |
| | (3 | )% |
Total noninterest expense | 16,422 |
| | 15,623 |
| | 5 |
| | 49,158 |
| | 47,674 |
| | 3 |
| 16,850 |
| | 16,395 |
| | 3 |
|
Pre-provision profit | 12,919 |
| | 11,637 |
| | 11 |
| | 38,138 |
| | 35,246 |
| | 8 |
| 11,401 |
| | 12,728 |
| | (10 | ) |
Provision for credit losses | 1,514 |
| | 948 |
| | 60 |
| | 4,158 |
| | 3,323 |
| | 25 |
| 8,285 |
| | 1,495 |
| | 454 |
|
Net income | 9,080 |
| | 8,380 |
| | 8 |
| | 27,911 |
| | 25,408 |
| | 10 |
| 2,865 |
| | 9,179 |
| | (69 | ) |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.68 |
| | $ | 2.34 |
| | 15 |
| | $ | 8.15 |
| | $ | 7.00 |
| | 16 |
| $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
| | (71 | ) |
Selected ratios and metrics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on common equity | 15 | % | | 14 | % | | | | 15 | % | | 14 | % | | | 4 | % | | 16 | % | | |
Return on tangible common equity | 18 |
| | 17 |
| | | | 19 |
| | 18 |
| | | 5 |
| | 19 |
| | |
Book value per share | $ | 75.24 |
| | $ | 69.52 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | 75.24 |
| | $ | 69.52 |
| | 8 |
| $ | 75.88 |
| | $ | 71.78 |
| | 6 |
|
Tangible book value per share | 60.48 |
| | 55.68 |
| | 9 |
| | 60.48 |
| | 55.68 |
| | 9 |
| 60.71 |
| | 57.62 |
| | 5 |
|
Capital ratios(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CET1 | 12.3 | % | | 12.0 | % | | | | 12.3 | % | | 12.0 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | 12.1 | % | | |
Tier 1 capital | 14.1 |
| | 13.6 |
| | | | 14.1 |
| | 13.6 |
| | | 13.3 |
| | 13.8 |
| | |
Total capital | 15.9 |
| | 15.4 |
| | | | 15.9 |
| | 15.4 |
| | | 15.5 |
| | 15.7 |
| | |
| |
(a) | The Basel III capital rules became fully phased-in effective January 1, 2019. During 2018,As of March 31, 2020, the required capital measures were subject toreflect the transitional rules and as of September 30, 2018, was the same on a fully phased-in and on a transitional basis.CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Key performance measures on page 59 and Capital Risk Management on pages 85-9485-92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K and pages 45–4939–44 of this Form 10-Q for additional information on these measures. |
Comparisons noted in the sections below are for the thirdfirst quarter of 2020 versus the first quarter of 2019, versus the third quarter of 2018, unless otherwise specified.
Firmwide overview
JPMorgan Chase reported strong results in the third quarter of 2019, with net income of $9.1$2.9 billion for the first quarter of 2020, or $2.68$0.78 per share, on record net revenue of $29.3$28.3 billion. The Firm reported ROE of 15%4% and ROTCE of 18%5%.
The Firm hadrecorded a number of significant items in the first quarter of 2020, including an addition to the allowance for credit losses of $6.8 billion, a $951 million loss in Credit Adjustments & Other in CIB predominantly driven by funding spread widening on derivatives, and $896 million of markdowns on held-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio in CIB and CB.
Net income was down 69%, predominantly driven by an increase in the provision for credit losses across the Firm reflecting deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and continued pressure on oil prices.
Total net revenue decreased 3%. Net interest income was $14.4 billion, flat versus the prior year, with the impact of $9.1lower rates offset by balance sheet growth and mix, as
well as higher net interest income in CIB Markets. Noninterest revenue was $13.8 billion, down 6%. The reduction in revenue included a $951 million loss in Credit Adjustments & Other in CIB predominantly driven by funding spread widening on derivatives and $896 million of markdowns on held-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio in CIB and CB; these items were partially offset by higher CIB Markets noninterest revenue.
Noninterest expense was $16.9 billion, up 8%.3%, driven by higher volume- and revenue-related expense and investments, as well as higher legal expense, partially offset by lower structural expense.
| |
• | Total net revenue increased 8%. Net interest incomeThe provision for credit losses was $14.2$8.3 billion, up 2%,$6.8 billion from the prior year driven by continued balance sheet growth and mix, largely offset by the impact of rates. additions to the allowance for credit losses.Noninterest revenue was $15.1 billion, up 13%, and included approximately $350 million of gains related to certain loan sales in Home Lending. Excluding these gains, the increase in noninterest revenue was largely driven by results in Fixed Income Markets in the CIB, as well as Home Lending and Auto in CCB.
|
Noninterest expense was $16.4 billion, up 5%, driven by higher volume- and revenue-related expenses and investments, including compensation and auto lease depreciation, partially offset by lower FDIC charges.
The provision for credit losses was $1.5 billion, up $566 million, largely as a result of net reductions in the allowance for credit losses and net recoveries in the prior year.
The total allowance for credit losses was $14.4$25.4 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and the Firm had a loan loss coverage ratio of 1.42%2.32%, compared with 1.39%1.43% in the prior year; excludingyear, driven by the PCI portfolio,additions to allowance for credit losses and the equivalent ratio was 1.32%, compared with 1.23% in the prior year.adoption of CECL. The Firm’s nonperforming assets totaled $5.3$6.4 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, an increase from $5.0$5.6 billion in the prior year, reflecting increasesdriven by the inclusion of purchased credit deteriorated loans in the wholesalemortgage portfolio, relatedwhich are subject to select client downgrades, largely offset by improved credit performance innonaccrual loan treatment following the consumer portfolio.adoption of CECL.
Firmwide average totalend-of-period (“EOP”) loans of $1.0 trillion were flat at $947 billion, or up 3% excluding6% driven by drawdowns on committed revolving credit facilities in March within the wholesale LOBs. Excluding the impact of certain loan sales in Home Lending.
Lending, EOP loans would have been up 9%. Firmwide average loans were $963 billion, down 1%. Excluding the impact of certain loan sales in Home Lending, average loans would have been up 3%.On March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases through the second quarter of 2020.
Selected capital-related metrics
The Firm’s CET1 capital was $188$184 billion, and the Standardized and Advanced CET1 ratios were 12.3%11.5% and 13.1%12.3%, respectively.
The Firm’s supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”)SLR was 6.3% at September 30, 2019.6.0%.
The Firm continued to grow tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”),grew TBVPS, ending the thirdfirst quarter of 20192020 at $60.48,$60.71, up 9%.5% versus the prior year.
ROTCE and TBVPS are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 19–20 forfor a further discussion of each of these measures.
Business segment highlights
Selected business metrics for each of the Firm’s four lines of businessLOBs are presented below for the thirdfirst quarter of 2019.2020.
|
| | |
CCB ROE 32% 1% | | • AverageEOP loans down 4%7%; Home Lending loans down 12%15% impacted by loan sales; credit card loans up 8%2%• ClientEOP Deposits up 10%; client investment assets up 13%3%; average depositscredit card sales volume up 3%4%• Credit card sales volume up 10% and merchant processing volume up 11%Provision for credit losses of $5.8 billion, including an addition to the allowance for credit losses of $4.5 billion |
CIB ROE 13% 9% | | • Maintained #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with 9.3%9.1% wallet share YTDin 1Q20• Total Markets revenue of $5.1$7.2 billion, up 14%32%• EOP loans up 30%; deposits up 37%• Provision for credit losses of $1.4 billion, including an addition to the allowance for credit losses of $1.3 billion |
CB ROE 16% 2% | | • Gross Investment Banking revenue of $700$686 million, up 20%down 16%• Average clientEOP loans up 14%; deposits up 39%• Provision for credit losses of $173$1.0 billion, up 3%including an addition to the allowance for credit losses of approximately $900 million |
AWM ROE 24%25% | | •
Average loan balances up 7%• Assets under management (AUM) of $2.2 trillion, up 8%7%• EOP loans up 16%; deposits up 18%• Provision for credit losses of $94 million driven by an addition to the allowance for credit losses |
Refer to the Business Segment Results on pages 21–4337 for a detailed discussion of results by business segment.
Credit provided and capital raised
JPMorgan Chase continues to support consumers, businesses and communities around the globe. The Firm provided new and renewed credit and raised capital for wholesale and consumer clients during the first ninethree months of 2019,2020, consisting of:
|
| | |
$1.7 trillion638 billion | | Total credit provided and capital raised |
| | |
$18863 billion | | Credit for consumers |
| | |
$258 billion | | Credit for U.S. small businesses |
| | |
$630213 billion | | Credit for corporations |
| | |
$785334 billion | | Capital raised for corporate clients and non-U.S. government entities |
| | |
$5320 billion | | Credit and capital raised for nonprofit and U.S. government entities(a) |
| |
(a) | Includes states, municipalities, hospitals and universities. |
20192020 outlook
These current expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorgan Chase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-Looking Statements on page 79 and Risk Factors on page 180 of this Form 10-Q and Risk Factors onand pages 7–6–28 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the other factors that could cause JPMorgan Chase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that actual results in the full year of 20192020 will be in line with the outlook set forth below, and the Firm does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements.
JPMorgan Chase’s current outlook for the remainder of 20192020 should be viewed against the backdrop of the global and U.S. economies, the COVID-19 pandemic, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the competitive environment, client and customer activity levels, and regulatory and legislative developments in the U.S. and other countries where the Firm does business. Each of these factors will affect the performance of the Firm and its lines of business.LOBs. The Firm expects that it will continue to make appropriate adjustments to its businesses and operations in response to ongoing developments in the business, economic, regulatory and legal environments in which it operates.The outlook information contained in the 2019 Form 10-K, in the Firm’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2020, containing copies of the slides furnished at the Firm’s 2020 Investor Day, and in the Firm’s Current Reports on Form 8-K dated April 14, 2020, to review 2020 first quarter earnings, is superseded by the information contained in this
Form 10-Q.
Firmwide
Management expects full-year 2019second quarter 2020 net interest income, on a managed basis, to be less than $57.5approximately $14 billion, market dependent. This estimate is basedFor the full-year 2020, management expects net interest income, on stable long-end rates and assumes no more federal funds rate cuts in 2019.a managed basis, to be approximately $56 billion, market dependent.
Management expects Firmwide adjusted expense for the full-year 20192020 to be approximately $65.5below $65 billion.
Management expects full-year 2019 net charge-offsadditions to the allowance for credit losses in the second quarter of 2020. Depending on the extent of the deterioration in macroeconomic conditions, the additions to the Firm’s allowance for credit losses could be approximately $5.5 billion.meaningfully higher in aggregate over the next several quarters versus the additions in the first quarter of 2020.
Business Developments
Expected departureCOVID-19 Pandemic
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm established a corporate crisis team (“CCT”) along with crisis response teams that are connected across countries, regions and globally. The CCT includes representation from each LOB and critical functions including Human Resources, Risk and Compliance, Legal, Security and Technology, and it engages directly with the Firm’s Operating Committee on a frequent basis. The CCT provides a central point for the gathering of data which allows for rapid identification and prioritization of issues. The CCT also monitors key operational metrics, risks and concerns on an ongoing basis.
The Firm invoked resiliency plans to allow its businesses to remain operational, utilizing disaster recovery sites and implementing alternative work arrangements globally. The Firm now has more than 180,000 employees globally working from home from every LOB and corporate function, including traders, bankers, portfolio managers, operations, finance, risk and compliance, legal and call center teams globally. The Firm is monitoring the status of work-from-home arrangements and has been updating relevant local authorities as appropriate. Management continues to monitor key operational metrics as well as thematic cross-business risks and concerns.
In addition, the Firm implemented strategies and procedures designed to help it respond to increased market volatility, client demand for credit and liquidity, distress in certain industries/sectors and the ongoing impacts to consumers and small businesses.
Supporting clients and customers
The Firm has continued to support its clients and customers as they navigate the challenging conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic by providing liquidity and advice. In March 2020, the Firm extended more than $100 billion of new and renewed credit to its clients and customers.
In the wholesale businesses, clients drew more than $50 billion on their committed revolving credit facilities, and the Firm approved over $25 billion of new credit extensions for clients most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, during the first quarter
In the consumer businesses, the Firm extended approximately $20 billion in new credit across Home Lending, Credit Card and Auto.
The Firm is actively participating in the Small Business Association’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and as of May 4th the Firm has funded approximately $29 billion under the program.
For customers that are experiencing financial hardships as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm developed a payment assistance program to allow mortgage, auto and card customers to delay payments for three months, as well as waiving or refunding certain fees.
Three-quarters of the Firm’s branch network continues to operate, ATMs remain accessible and the Firm continues to
provide a wide range of banking services accessible to customers online.
Protecting and supporting employees
In addition to widespread work-from-home arrangements, the Firm has taken further actions to protect and support its employees including;
For employees with jobs that can only be performed on-site, modified business operations, implemented staggered shifts, changed seating arrangements, closed buildings to nonessential visitors and intensified and increased frequency of cleaning of all offices and branches worldwide
Ensured that all branch employees are being paid for their regularly scheduled hours even if those hours are reduced or their branch is temporarily closed
Continued to pay employees who are at home due to potential exposure to the virus or whose health is at higher risk as well as provided paid medical leave to affected employees
Deployed clinical staff internally to support employees
Granted a special payment of up to $1,000 to full- and part-time employees whose jobs require them to continue working on-site and whose annual cash compensation is less than $60,000
Provided all employees with up to five additional paid days off to manage personal needs, which may include dependent care, child care or other issues, as well as offering free COVID-19 related medical treatment for all of the Firm’s U.S. employees and their dependents.
Giving to communities
The Firm has taken steps to help address immediate humanitarian needs and long-term economic challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the communities in which it operates. To help the most vulnerable and hardest hit communities, the Firm has announced a $150 million loan program to deploy capital to underserved small businesses and nonprofits, as well as a $50 million philanthropic commitment. An initial $15 million commitment is intended to:
Provide immediate healthcare, food and other humanitarian relief globally
Help existing nonprofit partners around the world that are responding in their communities to the COVID-19 pandemic
Assist small businesses that are vulnerable to economic hardships.
Regulatory actions and programs
Refer to Regulatory Developments Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic on pages 10-11 for information concerning relevant regulatory actions and the significant financing programs in which the Firm is participating in order to support its customers and clients.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Firm’s results and operations are discussed throughout this document.
Departure of the U.K. from the EU
The U.K.’s expected departure from the EU, which is commonly referred to as “Brexit,” is scheduled to occur not later than January 31, 2020.
The Firm continues to execute the relevant elements ofon its Firmwide Brexit Implementation program with the objective of delivering the Firm’s capabilities to its EU clients on “day one” of any departure by the U.K. from the EU, whether or not an agreement has been reached to allow an orderly withdrawal.
The principal operational risks associated with Brexit continue to be the potential for disruption caused by insufficient preparations by individual market participants or in the overall market ecosystem, and risks related to potential disruptions of connectivity among market participants. Although legislative and regulatory actions taken by the EU and the U.K. have mitigated some of the significant market-wide risks, there continues to be regulatory and legal uncertainty with respect to various matters including contract continuity and access by market participants to liquidity in certain products, such as products subject to potentially conflicting U.K. and EU regulatory requirements in relation to eligible trading venues, including certain cross-border derivative contracts and equities that are listed on both U.K. and EU exchanges.
As discussed in Business Developments on page 46 of the 2018 Form 10-K, the Firm isremains focused on the following key areas to ensure continuation of service to its EU clients: regulatory and legal entity readiness; client readiness; and business and operational readiness. Following areHowever, the significant updates from the matters discussed in the 2018 Form 10-K.
Regulatory and legal entity readiness
The Firm’s legal entities in Germany, Luxembourg and Ireland are now prepared and licensed to provide servicesCOVID-19 pandemic has added incremental risk to the Firm’s EUprogram due to the potential impact on execution of changes such as relocation of employees given travel restrictions, or the ability of clients including after any departure byto be operationally ready to the U.K. fromextent that they have diverted resources to address the EU.
Client readiness
The agreements covering a significant proportioneffects of the Firm’s EU client activity have been re-documentedpandemic. It has also slowed down the political process to other EUfinalize the legal entitiesand regulatory framework that will be in place after the transition period that is scheduled to help facilitate continuationexpire on December 31, 2020, thus lengthening the period of service.planning uncertainty.
Interbank Offered Rate (“IBOR”) transition
On March 12, 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update providing optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts and hedge relationships affected by benchmark reform. The Firm expects to apply certain of the practical expedients and is evaluating the timing and application of those elections. Refer to Accounting and Reporting Developments on page 78 for additional information. The Firm continues to actively engage with clients that have not completed re-documentation to ensure preparedness both in termsmonitor the transition relief being considered by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and U.S. Treasury Department regarding accounting and tax implications of documentation and any operational changes that may be required. The Firm may be negatively impacted by any operational disruption stemming from delays of or lapses in the readiness of other market participants or market infrastructures.
Business and operational readinessreference rate reform.
The Firm relocated certain employees during the first quarter of 2019. During the second quarter of 2019, the Firm added specific employees to certain EU legal entities, where appropriate, to support the level of client activity that has been migrated. However, the Firm’s final staffing plan will depend upon the timing and terms of any withdrawal by the U.K. from the EU.
If Brexit is further delayed due to a transition deal or another mechanism, the Firm will continue to review the timing and extent of any further expansion of activities in its EU legal entities, as appropriate. The Firm continues to closely monitor legislative developments, and its implementation plan allows for flexibility given the continued uncertainties.
LIBOR transition
The Firmalso continues to develop and implement plans to appropriately mitigate the risks associated with the expected discontinuation of certain unsecured benchmark interest rates, including the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other Interbank Offered Rates (“IBORs”). In particular, the Firm:
has implemented or is in the process of implementing fallback language for LIBOR-linked syndicated loans, securitizations, floating rate notes and bi-lateral business loans based on the recommendations of the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, and has started to introduce the Secured Overnight Financing Rate as a replacement benchmark rate for certain of these products;
continues to monitor the transition relief being considered by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) concerning the accounting for contract modifications and hedge accounting; and
continues to engage with regulators and clients as the transition from IBORs progresses.
IBOR discontinuation. Refer to Business Developments on page 47 of the 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s initiatives to address the expected discontinuation of LIBORthe London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other IBORs.
Regulatory Developments Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Beginning in March 2020, the U.S. government as well as central banks around the world have taken a series of actions to help individuals, households and businesses that have been adversely affected by the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which was signed into law on March 27, 2020, provides, among other things, funding to support loan facilities to assist consumers and businesses. Set forth below is a summary as of the date of this Form 10-Q of U.S. government actions currently impacting the Firm and U.S. government programs in which the Firm is participating to support individuals, businesses, and the broader economy. The Firm will continue to assess ongoing developments in government actions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. government actions
Eligible retained income definition. On March 17, 2020, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), collectively the “federal banking agencies,” issued an interim final rule that revised the definition of “eligible retained income” in the regulatory capital rules that apply to all U.S. banking organizations. On March 23, 2020, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule that revised the definition of “eligible retained income” for purposes of the total loss-absorbing capacity (“TLAC”) buffer requirements that apply to global systemically important banking organizations. The revised definition of eligible retained income makes any automatic limitations on payout distributions that could apply under the agencies’ capital rules or TLAC rule take effect on a more graduated basis in the event that a banking organization’s capital, leverage and TLAC ratios were to decline below regulatory requirements (including buffers). The March 17 interim final rule was issued, in conjunction with an interagency statement encouraging banking organizations to use their capital and liquidity buffers, to further support banking organizations’ abilities to lend to households and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Reserve requirements. On March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent, effectively eliminating the reserve requirement for all depository institutions, an action that frees up liquidity in the banking system to support lending to households and businesses.
Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 45–49 and Note 21 for additional information on the reduction to the reserve requirement.
Regulatory Capital - Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) transition delay. On March 31, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that provided the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on
regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three-year transition period (“CECL capital transition provisions”). The Firm elected to apply the CECL capital transition provisions.
Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 39–44 and Note 22 on pages 159-160 for additional information on the CECL capital transition provisions and the impact to the Firm’s capital measures.
Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”) temporary revision. On April 1, 2020, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule that revises, on a temporary basis, the calculation of total leverage exposure for purposes of calculating the SLR for bank holding companies, to exclude the on-balance sheet amounts of U.S. Treasury securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks. These exclusions will allow the Firm to continue to support U.S. Treasury markets and to serve as financial intermediaries for households and businesses. This exclusion is effective April 1, 2020, and will remain in effect through March 31, 2021.
Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 39–44 for additional information on the Firm’s SLR.
Loan modifications. On April 7, 2020, the federal banking agencies along with the National Credit Union Administration, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in consultation with the state financial regulators, issued an interagency statement revising a March 22, 2020 interagency statement on loan modifications and the reporting for financial institutions working with customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (the “IA Statement”). The IA Statement reconfirmed that efforts to work with borrowers where the loans are prudently underwritten, and not considered past due or carried on nonaccrual status, should not result in the loans automatically being considered modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) for accounting and financial reporting purposes, or for purposes of their respective risk-based capital rules, which would otherwise require financial institutions subject to the capital rules to hold more capital. The IA Statement also clarifies the interaction between its previous guidance and Section 4013 of the CARES Act, which provides certain financial institutions the option to suspend the application of accounting guidance for TDRs for a limited period of time for loan modifications made to address the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The special considerations addressed in the IA Statement and Section 4013 of the CARES Act, if applied, would have had no impact on the accounting for the Firm’s modification activities in the three months ended March 31, 2020 but may be relevant for modifications offered in the future.
Refer to Credit Portfolio on pages 50-51 and Note 12 for additional information on the Firm’s loan modification activities.
U.S. government facilities and programs. Beginning in March 2020, the Federal Reserve announced a suite of facilities using its emergency lending powers under section 13(3) of
the Federal Reserve Act to support the flow of credit to individuals, households and businesses adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the broader economy. These facilities include the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (“MMLF”), Primary Dealer Credit Facility (“PDCF”) and Commercial Paper Funding Facility (“CPFF”). The Firm is currently participating in the MMLF and PDCF to support the broader economy by providing liquidity to money market mutual funds and supporting the functioning of the secured financing market, respectively. Under the CPFF, the Firm is acting as a dealer to purchase eligible commercial paper. In addition, beginning April 3, 2020, the PPP, established by the CARES Act and administered by the SBA, authorized eligible lenders to provide nonrecourse loans to small businesses to provide an incentive for these businesses to keep their workers on their payroll. The Firm is currently participating in the PPP to support its small business clients.
Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 39–44, Liquidity Risk Management on pages 45–49 and Note 22 for additional information of the Firm’s participation in the MMLF. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 45–49 for additional information of the Firm’s participation in the PDCF. Refer to Business Developments on pages 8-9 for additional information on the Firm’s participation in the PPP.
|
| | | | |
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This section provides a comparative discussion of JPMorgan Chase’s Consolidated Results of Operations on a reported basis for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, unless otherwise specified. Factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment. Refer to pages 76–75–77 of this Form 10-Q and pages 141-143136–138 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm that affect the Consolidated Results of Operations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Investment banking fees | $ | 1,866 |
| | $ | 1,840 |
| | 1 | % |
Principal transactions | 2,937 |
| | 4,076 |
| | (28 | ) |
Lending- and deposit-related fees(a) | 1,706 |
| | 1,559 |
| | 9 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions(a) | 4,540 |
| | 4,037 |
| | 12 |
|
Investment securities gains | 233 |
| | 13 |
| | NM |
|
Mortgage fees and related income | 320 |
| | 396 |
| | (19 | ) |
Card income | 1,054 |
| | 1,274 |
| | (17 | ) |
Other income(b) | 1,156 |
| | 1,475 |
| | (22 | ) |
Noninterest revenue | 13,812 |
| | 14,670 |
| | (6 | ) |
Net interest income | 14,439 |
| | 14,453 |
| | — |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 28,251 |
| | $ | 29,123 |
| | (3 | )% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
|
Investment banking fees | $ | 1,967 |
| | $ | 1,832 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 5,658 |
| | $ | 5,736 |
| | (1 | )% |
Principal transactions | 3,449 |
| | 2,964 |
| | 16 |
| | 11,239 |
| | 10,698 |
| | 5 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees | 1,626 |
| | 1,542 |
| | 5 |
| | 4,643 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 3 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions | 4,351 |
| | 4,310 |
| | 1 |
| | 12,818 |
| | 12,923 |
| | (1 | ) |
Investment securities gains/(losses) | 78 |
| | (46 | ) | | NM |
| | 135 |
| | (371 | ) | | NM |
|
Mortgage fees and related income | 887 |
| | 262 |
| | 239 |
| | 1,562 |
| | 1,051 |
| | 49 |
|
Card income | 1,283 |
| | 1,328 |
| | (3 | ) | | 3,923 |
| | 3,623 |
| | 8 |
|
Other income(a) | 1,472 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 27 |
| | 4,239 |
| | 4,041 |
| | 5 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 15,113 |
| | 13,352 |
| | 13 |
| | 44,217 |
| | 42,215 |
| | 5 |
|
Net interest income | 14,228 |
| | 13,908 |
| | 2 |
| | 43,079 |
| | 40,705 |
| | 6 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 29,341 |
| | $ | 27,260 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 87,296 |
| | $ | 82,920 |
| | 5 | % |
| |
(a) | Included operating lease income of $1.4 billion and $1.2 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively and $4.0 billion and $3.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
Quarterly results(a) In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and commissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
(b) Included operating lease income of $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
Investment banking fees increased, driven by CIB, reflecting:
higher debt underwriting fees ondriven by both increased industry-wide fees and wallet share gains despite a decline in industry-wide fees, driven by participation in large acquisition financing deals and increased activity in investment-grade bonds, particularly in March, as clients sought to access liquidity,
higher equity underwriting fees driven by wallet share gainsincreased industry-wide fees primarily in the IPO market, with strong activity in January and convertible markets,February, compared to a weak prior year,
partiallylargely offset by
lower advisory fees compared to a strong prior year, driven by a declinelower number of completed transactions, as well as the impact of delays in industry-wide fees compared with a strong prior year.regulatory approvals.
Refer to CIB segment results on pages 28–3326–30 and Note 56 for additional information.
Principal transactions revenue increased reflecting:decreased reflecting two significant items:
higher revenuea $951 million loss in CIB’s Credit Adjustments & Other predominantly driven by funding spread widening on derivatives, and
$896 million of markdowns on held-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio in CIB primarilyand CB, as high-yield spreads widened significantly.
Excluding these two items, principal transactions revenue increased driven by
| |
– | strong performance across products in Fixed Income Markets on strong client activity, primarily in Rates, agency mortgage trading within Securitized Products, and Commodities, compared with the prior year, which was impacted by less favorable market conditions,
|
partially offset by
| |
– | lower revenue in Equity Markets, primarily in derivatives, driven by lower client activity and less favorable market conditions, compared with a strong prior year, and |
in Corporate, net gainsRates and Currencies & Emerging Markets, as a result of higher trading volume, and in Equity Markets on certain legacy private equity investments compared with net lossesstrong client activity in the prior year.derivatives, particularly in March for both businesses.
Principal transactions revenue in CIB may in certain cases have offsets across other revenue lines, including net interest income. The Firm assesses its CIB Markets business performance on a total revenue basis.
Refer to CIB, AWMCB and Corporate segment results on pages 28–33,26–30, pages 38–4134–36 and pages 42–43,page 37, and Note 56 for additional information.
Lending- and deposit-related fees increased primarily due to higher deposit-related fees in CCB, reflecting growth in customer accounts and transactions, and in CIB and CB from an increase in cash management transactions.
Refer to CCB segment results on pages 22–27,23–25, CIB on pages 28–3326–30 and CB on pages 34–37,31–33, respectively, and Note 56 for additional information.
Asset management, administration and commissions revenue increased driven by by:
higher brokerage commissions in CIB and AWM on higher client-driven volume particularly in March, and
higher asset management fees in AWM and CCB from growthas a result of higher asset values at the beginning of 2020, driven by higher average market levels and strong net inflows into long-term products over the past year, despite the impact of market volatility in client investment assets.March.
Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment results on pages 22–2723–25, pages 26–30 and pages 38–4134–36 , respectively, and Note 56 for additional information.
Investment securities gains/(losses) gainsprimarily reflect in both periods reflected the impact of repositioning the investment securities portfolio. Refer to Corporate segment results on pages 42–43page 37 and Note 910 for additional information.
Mortgage fees and related income increased driven by:decreased due to:
lower net mortgage servicing revenue reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates and a lower level of third-party loans serviced, as well as lower MSR risk management results,
largely offset by
higher net mortgage production revenue reflecting approximately $350 million of gains on the sale of certain loans, as well as higher production volumes and margins,
net mortgage servicing revenue, which remained relatively flat, reflecting lower operating revenue driven by and the impactabsence of reclassifying certain loans to held-for-sale and faster prepayment speedsa gain on lower rates, offset by favorable MSR risk management results.a loan sale in the prior year.
Refer to CCB segment results on pages 22–27,23–25, Note 56 and 1415 for further information.
Card income decreased driven by lower net interchange income reflecting higher rewards costs and partner payments, predominantlypartially offset by higher interchange income and merchant processing fees on higher volumes.card sales volume, despite a decline in March.
Refer to CCB segment results on pages 22–2723–25 and Note 56 for further information.
Other income decreased reflecting:
losses on certain equity investments in CIB
net valuation losses on certain investments in AWM, compared with gains in the prior year
higher amortization on a higher level of alternative energy investments in CIB. The increased reflecting:amortization is more than offset by lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits.
largely offset by
higher operating lease income from growth in auto operating lease volume in CCB
losses in the prior year on certain investments in CIB and Corporate,
partially offset by
lower other income in CIB associated with increased amortization on a higher level of alternative energy investments. The increased amortization was more than offset by the lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits.
Refer to Note 56 for further information.
Net interest income increased drivenwas flat as the impact of lower rates was offset by continued balance sheet growth and changes in mix, largely offset by theas well as higher CIB Markets net impact of rates. interest income.
The Firm’s average interest-earning assets were $2.4$2.5 trillion, up $162$167 billion, and the yield was 3.14%, down 66 bps. The net interest yield on these assets, on a fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”)an FTE basis, was 2.41%2.37%, a decrease of 12 basis points.20 bps. The net interest yield excluding CIB Markets was 3.23%3.01%, a decrease of 7 basis points. down 42bps.
Net interest yield excluding CIB marketsMarkets is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates schedule on pages 166–167page 170 for further details; and the Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 19–20 for a further discussion of Net interest yield excluding CIB markets.
Year-to-date results
Investment banking fees were relatively flat reflecting:
lower advisory and equity underwriting fees driven by a decline in industry-wide fees despite wallet share gains,
offset by
higher debt underwriting fees on wallet share gains despite a decline in industry-wide fees, driven by participation in large acquisition financing deals
Principal transactions revenue increased reflecting:
higher revenue in CIB, which included a gain on the IPO of Tradeweb. Excluding this gain, the increase in CIB’s revenue was driven by:
| |
– | higher revenue in Fixed Income Markets, primarily in agency mortgage trading within Securitized Products, and Commodities, partially offset by Currencies & Emerging Markets |
| |
– | favorable changes in funding spreads on derivatives in Credit Adjustments & Other, |
partially offset by
| |
– | lower revenue in Equity Markets driven by lower client activity in derivatives |
the net increase in CIB was partially offset by
lower revenue in AWM, related to hedges on certain investments, which was more than offset by higher valuation gains on the related investments reflected in other income,
Corporate was relatively flat, reflecting
| |
– | losses on cash deployment transactions in Treasury and CIO, which were more than offset by the related net interest income earned on those transactions, and |
| |
– | lower net valuation losses on certain legacy private equity investments. |
Principal transactions revenue in CIB may have offsets across other revenue lines, including net interest income. The Firm assesses its Markets business performance on a total revenue basis.
Lending- and deposit-related fees increased primarily due to higher deposit-related fees in CCB, reflecting growth in customer accounts and transactions.
Asset management, administration and commissions revenue was relatively flat reflecting:
lower asset management fees in AWM driven by a shift in the mix toward lower fee products,
largely offset by
higher asset management fees in CCB from growth in client investment assets.
Investment securities gains/(losses) primarily reflect the impact of repositioning the investment securities portfolio.
Mortgage fees and related income increased driven by:
higher net mortgage production revenue reflecting gains on sales of certain loans, as well as higher mortgage production margins and volumes,
partially offset by
lower net mortgage servicing revenue driven by
| |
– | lower operating revenue reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates and the impact of reclassifying certain loans to held-for-sale, as well as |
| |
– | lower MSR risk management results reflecting updates to model inputs. |
Card income increased reflecting the absence of the prior-year adjustment of approximately $330 million to the credit card rewards liability.
Other income increased reflecting:
higher operating lease income from growth in auto operating lease volume in CCB, and
higher investment valuation gains in AWM, which were largely offset by the impact of the related hedges reflected in principal transactions revenue,
partially offset by
lower other income in CIB associated with increased amortization on a higher level of alternative energy investments. The increased amortization was more than offset by the lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits.
The prior year included:
$505 million of fair value gains related to the adoption of the recognition and measurement accounting guidance for certain equity investments previously held at cost in the first quarter of 2018, and
losses on certain investments in CIB and Corporate.
Net interest income increased driven by continued balance sheet growth |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions)
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Consumer, excluding credit card | $ | 619 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | 416 | % |
Credit card | 5,063 |
| | 1,202 |
| | 321 |
|
Total consumer | 5,682 |
| | 1,322 |
| | 330 |
|
Wholesale | 2,594 |
| | 173 |
| | NM |
|
Investment securities | 9 |
| | NA |
| | NM |
|
Total provision for credit losses | $ | 8,285 |
| | $ | 1,495 |
| | 454 | % |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and changeslending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in mix. The Firm’s average interest-earning assets were $2.3 trillion, up $136 billion, anddetermining the net interest yield on these assets, on an FTE basis, was 2.49%, a decrease ofallowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 basis point. The net interest yield excluding CIB Markets was 3.34%, an increase of 13 basis points. Net interest yield excluding CIB markets is a non-GAAP financial measure.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions)
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
|
Consumer, excluding credit card | $ | (61 | ) | | $ | (242 | ) | | 75 | % | | $ | (265 | ) | | $ | (152 | ) | | (74 | )% |
Credit card | 1,375 |
| | 1,223 |
| | 12 |
| | 4,017 |
| | 3,557 |
| | 13 |
|
Total consumer | 1,314 |
| | 981 |
| | 34 |
| | 3,752 |
| | 3,405 |
| | 10 |
|
Wholesale | 200 |
| | (33 | ) | | NM |
| | 406 |
| | (82 | ) | | NM |
|
Total provision for credit losses | $ | 1,514 |
| | $ | 948 |
| | 60 | % | | $ | 4,158 |
| | $ | 3,323 |
| | 25 | % |
Quarterly resultsfor further information.
The provision for credit losses increased driven by additions to both the consumer and wholesale.wholesale allowance for credit losses.
The increase in total consumer provision reflects:was driven by:
anadditions of $4.4 billion to the allowance for credit losses, reflecting the deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, consisting of $3.8 billion for Card, $300 million for Home Lending, $235 million for Auto, and $80 million for CBB;
net charge-offs were flat reflecting higher net charge-offs in Card on loan growth, in line with prior expectations, offset by higher recoveries in Home Lending on a current period loan sale.
The increase in credit card due to
| |
– | higher net charge-offs on loan growth, in line with expectations, and |
| |
– | a $200 million addition to the allowance for loan losses reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger part of the portfolio, compared to a $150 million addition in the prior year |
an increase in consumer, excluding credit card in CCB due to
| |
– | a $100 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio, compared to a $250 million reduction in the PCI residential real estate portfolio in the prior year, and |
| |
– | lower net recoveries in the residential real estate portfolio as the prior year benefited from a larger recovery on a loan sale |
partially offset by
| |
– | a $50 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the business banking portfolio. |
The wholesale provisionreflects a net addition of $2.4 billion to the allowance for credit losses across the LOBs. The net addition was largelypredominantly driven by select Commercialthe deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple sectors, and continued pressure on oil prices, with the largest impacts in the Oil & Industrial (“C&I”) client downgrades. The prior year was a net benefit which included net recoveries predominantly related to a loan sale in CIB.Gas, Real Estate, and Consumer & Retail industries.
Refer to CCB segment results on pages 22–27,23–25, CIB on pages 28–33,26–30, CB on pages 34–37,31–33, AWM on pages 38–41,34–36, the Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 67–68,64–65, and Note 1213 for additional information on the credit portfolio and the allowance for credit losses.
Year-to-date results
The provision for credit losses increased driven by wholesale and consumer.
The wholesale provision was largely driven by select C&I client downgrades. The prior year was a net benefit primarily driven by loan sales and other activity related to a single name in the Oil & Gas portfolio, partially offset by other net portfolio activity.
The total consumer provision reflects:
an increase in credit card due to
| |
– | a $400 million addition to the allowance for loan losses reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger part of the portfolio and loan growth, compared to a $150 million addition in the prior year, and |
| |
– | higher net charge-offs on loan growth, in line with expectations |
partially offset by
a decrease in consumer, excluding credit card in CCB due to
| |
– | a $400 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the PCI residential real estate portfolio, reflecting continued improvement in home prices and delinquencies, and a $100 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio, compared to a $250 million reduction in the PCI residential real estate portfolio in the prior year, and |
| |
– | a $50 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the business banking portfolio |
largely offset by
| |
– | lower net recoveries in the residential real estate portfolio as the prior year benefited from larger recoveries on loan sales. |
| | Noninterest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions)
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Compensation expense | $ | 8,583 |
| | $ | 8,108 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 26,067 |
| | $ | 25,308 |
| | 3 | % | $ | 8,895 |
| | $ | 8,937 |
| | — |
|
Noncompensation expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Occupancy | 1,110 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 9 |
| | 3,238 |
| | 2,883 |
| | 12 |
| 1,066 |
| | 1,068 |
| | — |
|
Technology, communications and equipment | 2,494 |
| | 2,219 |
| | 12 |
| | 7,236 |
| | 6,441 |
| | 12 |
| 2,578 |
| | 2,364 |
| | 9 |
|
Professional and outside services | 2,056 |
| | 2,086 |
| | (1 | ) | | 6,307 |
| | 6,333 |
| | — |
| 2,028 |
| | 2,039 |
| | (1 | ) |
Marketing | 945 |
| | 798 |
| | 18 |
| | 2,686 |
| | 2,396 |
| | 12 |
| 859 |
| | 879 |
| | (2 | ) |
Other expense(a)(b) | 1,234 |
| | 1,398 |
| | (12 | ) | | 3,624 |
| | 4,313 |
| | (16 | ) | 1,424 |
| | 1,108 |
| | 29 |
|
Total noncompensation expense | 7,839 |
| | 7,515 |
| | 4 |
| | 23,091 |
| | 22,366 |
| | 3 |
| 7,955 |
| | 7,458 |
| | 7 |
|
Total noninterest expense | $ | 16,422 |
| | $ | 15,623 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 49,158 |
| | $ | 47,674 |
| | 3 | % | $ | 16,850 |
| | $ | 16,395 |
| | 3 | % |
| |
(a) | Included Firmwide legal expense/(benefit) of $10$197 million and $20$(81) million for the three months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018, respectively and $(2) million and $90 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.2019. |
| |
(b) | Included FDIC-related expense of $114$99 million and $349$143 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018, respectively and $378 million and $1.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.2019. |
Quarterly results
Compensation expense increased driven by higher revenue-relatedwas flat as efficiencies in several businesses and lower compensation expense in CIB andwas offset by investments across the businesses, including front office hires, as well as technology staff.in new hires.
Noncompensation expense increased as a result of:
higher investments across the businesses, including technology, real estatelegal expense in CIB and marketing, andCorporate
higher volume-related expense, including depreciation from growth in auto operating lease assets in CCB, and brokerage expense in certain businesses in CIB
partially offset by
lower FDIC charges as a result of the elimination of the surcharge at the end of the third quarter of 2018, and
lower other regulatory-related charges in CIB.
Year-to-date results
Compensation expense increased driven by investments across the businesses, including front office hires, as well as technology staff, partially offset by lower revenue-related expense in CIB.
Noncompensation expense increased as a result of:
higher investments across the businesses, including technology, real estate and marketing
higher volume-related expense, including depreciation from growth in auto operating lease assets in CCB, and brokerage expense in certain businesses in CIB
contributions to the Firm’s Foundation, whereas all prior-year contributions were made in the fourth quarter, and
higher pension costs due to changes to actuarial assumptions and estimates,
partially offset by
lower FDIC charges as a result of the elimination of the surcharge at the end of the third quarter of 2018
lower other regulatory-related charges in CIB
lower legal expense, and
lower distribution fees in AWM.
The prior year included a loss of $174 million on the liquidation of a legal entity in Corporate recorded in otherstructural expense.
Refer to Note 19 for additional information on the liquidation of a legal entity.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions)
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
Income before income tax expense | $ | 11,405 |
| | $ | 10,689 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 33,980 |
| | $ | 31,923 |
| | 6 | % |
Income tax expense | 2,325 |
| | 2,309 |
| | 1 |
| | 6,069 |
| | 6,515 |
| | (7 | ) |
Effective tax rate | 20.4 | % | | 21.6 | % | | | | 17.9 | % | | 20.4 | % | | |
Quarterly results |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions)
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Income before income tax expense | $ | 3,116 |
| | $ | 11,233 |
| | (72 | )% |
Income tax expense | 251 |
| | 2,054 |
| | (88 | ) |
Effective tax rate | 8.1 | % | | 18.3 | % | | |
The effective tax rate decreased due to the recognition of tax benefits related to the resolution of certain tax audits anddriven by changes in the level and mix of income and expenseexpenses subject to U.S. federal, and state and local taxes. In addition,taxes, as well as the prior year included a $132 million net tax benefit resulting from changes in the estimates under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) related to the remeasurement of certain deferred taxes and the deemed repatriation tax on non-U.S. earnings.
Year-to-date results
The effective tax rate decreased due to the recognition of $1.0 billion of tax benefits related to the resolutionmore significant effect of certain tax audits and changes in the mixbenefits on a lower level of income and expense subject to U.S. federal, and state and local taxes. The decrease was partially offset by lower tax benefits related to the vesting of employee stock-based awards. In addition, the prior year included a $305 million net tax benefit resulting from changes in the estimates under the TCJA related to the remeasurement of certain deferred taxes and the deemed repatriation tax on non-U.S. earnings. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on the 2019 tax benefits.pre-tax income.
|
| | | | |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CASH FLOWS ANALYSIS
|
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
Consolidated balance sheets analysis
The following is a discussion of the significant changes between September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | Selected Consolidated balance sheets data | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| Change |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| Change |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $ | 21,215 |
| | $ | 22,324 |
| (5 | )% | $ | 24,001 |
| | $ | 21,704 |
| 11 | % |
Deposits with banks | 235,382 |
| | 256,469 |
| (8 | ) | 343,533 |
| | 241,927 |
| 42 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 257,391 |
| | 321,588 |
| (20 | ) | 248,580 |
| | 249,157 |
| — |
|
Securities borrowed | 138,336 |
| | 111,995 |
| 24 |
| 139,839 |
| | 139,758 |
| — |
|
Trading assets | 495,875 |
| | 413,714 |
| 20 |
| 548,580 |
| | 411,103 |
| 33 |
|
Investment securities | 394,251 |
| | 261,828 |
| 51 |
| |
Available-for-sale securities | | 399,944 |
| | 350,699 |
| 14 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for credit losses | | 71,200 |
| | 47,540 |
| 50 |
|
Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses | | 471,144 |
| | 398,239 |
| 18 |
|
Loans | 945,218 |
| | 984,554 |
| (4 | ) | 1,015,375 |
| | 959,769 |
| 6 |
|
Allowance for loan losses | (13,235 | ) | | (13,445 | ) | (2 | ) | (23,244 | ) | | (13,123 | ) | 77 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses | 931,983 |
| | 971,109 |
| (4 | ) | 992,131 |
| | 946,646 |
| 5 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable | 88,988 |
| | 73,200 |
| 22 |
| 122,064 |
| | 72,861 |
| 68 |
|
Premises and equipment | 25,117 |
| | 14,934 |
| 68 |
| 25,882 |
| | 25,813 |
| — |
|
Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets | 53,078 |
| | 54,349 |
| (2 | ) | 51,867 |
| | 53,341 |
| (3 | ) |
Other assets | 123,045 |
| | 121,022 |
| 2 |
| 171,810 |
| | 126,830 |
| 35 |
|
Total assets | $ | 2,764,661 |
| | $ | 2,622,532 |
| 5 | % | $ | 3,139,431 |
| | $ | 2,687,379 |
| 17 | % |
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks decreasedincreased primarily as a result of a shift insignificant deposit inflows, which also funded asset growth across the deployment of cash in Treasury and CIO to investment securities.Firm. Deposits with banks reflect the Firm’s placements of its excess cash with various central banks, including the Federal Reserve Banks.
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements decreased largelywas flat as a result of a shiftthe reduction in the deployment of cash in Treasury and CIO.CIO was offset by an increase in client-driven market-making activities and higher collateral requirements as a result of changes in market conditions in March, as well as higher demand for securities to cover short positions when compared with lower levels at year-end in CIB. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 and Note 10 for additional information.
Securities borrowed increased in CIB driven by higher demand for securities related to client-driven market-making activities in Fixed Income Markets, and to cover customer short positions in prime brokerage. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–54 and Note 1011 for additional information.
Trading assets increased, due to:
reflecting growth in client-driven market-making activities in CIB, primarilypredominantly debt instruments in Fixed Income Markets and equity instruments in Equity Markets, including prime brokerage, and when compared with lower levels at year-end, and
as well as higher derivative receivables in CCB, an increase in U.S. GSE MBS acquiredCIB as parta result of market movements, including the impact of the proceeds of warehouse loan sales, and growth related to originations of mortgage warehouse loans, resulting from the favorable rate environment,
partially offset by
a reduction in short-term instruments associated with cash deployment activities in Treasury and CIO.COVID-19 pandemic.
Refer to Notes 2 and 45 for additional information.
Investment securities increased, primarily reflectingreflecting:
in the available-for-sale (“AFS”) portfolio, net purchases of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS in Treasury and CIOU.S. Treasuries driven by interest rate risk management activities, partially offset by a non-cash transfer of $26.1 billion of U.S. GSE and broader balance sheet management. government agency MBS from the AFS to the held-to-maturity (“HTM”) portfolio, resulting in a comparable increase in HTM.
Refer to Corporate segment results on pages 42–43,page 37, Investment Portfolio Risk Management on page 69,66, and Notes 2 and 910 for additional information on Investment securities.
Loans decreasedincreased predominantly reflecting loan salesdrawdowns on committed revolving credit facilities in Home Lending, and lower loansMarch in CIB, primarily driven by a loan syndicationCB and net pay downs,AWM, partially offset by increasesa reduction in CBCard due to seasonality and AWM.a decline in sales volume in March as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The allowance for loan losses decreasedincreased driven by:
additions of $5.9 billion, consisting of
| |
•– | $4.4 billion in consumer, predominantly in Credit Card, reflecting the deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and |
| |
– | a $550 million reductionnet $1.6 billion in wholesale, primarily reflecting the deterioration in the CCB allowance for loan losses, which includes $400 millionmacroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple sectors, and continued pressure on oil prices, with the largest impacts in the PCI residential real estate portfolio, reflecting continued improvement in home pricesOil & Gas, Real Estate, and delinquencies; $100 million in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio;Consumer & Retail industries, and $50 million in the business banking portfolio; as well as |
| |
• | a $132 million reduction for write-offsnet $4.2 billion addition as a result of PCI loans,the adoption of CECL. |
largely offset by
a $400 million additionThere were also additions to the allowance for loan losseslending-related commitments, which is included in other liabilities on the credit card portfolio reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger partconsolidated balance sheets, of $858 million related to the impact of the portfolioCOVID-19 pandemic and loan growth.continued pressure on oil prices, and $98 million related to the adoption of CECL, resulting in total additions to the allowance for credit losses of $6.8 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, as of March 31, 2020.
Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 55–69,50–66, and Notes 1, 2, 3, 1112 and 1213 for a more detailed discussion of loans and the allowance for loan losses.
Accrued interest and accounts receivable increased reflectingpredominantly driven by higher client receivables related to client-driven activities in CIB.CIB during a period of heightened market volatility.
Premises and equipment increased due to the adoption of the new lease accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019. Refer to Note 16 for additional information.
Goodwill, MSRs and other intangibles decreased reflecting lower MSRs as a result of faster prepayment speeds on lower rates and the realization of expected cash flows, partially offset by an increase in goodwill associated withnet additions to the acquisition of InstaMed.MSRs. Refer to Note 1415 for additional information.
Other assets increased reflecting higher cash collateral placed with central counterparties during a period of heightened market volatility, and the Firm’s participation in the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston’s (“FRBB”) MMLF. The assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients related to the MMLF were funded by nonrecourse advances from the FRBB, which are recorded in short-term borrowings. Refer to Regulatory Developments Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic on pages 10-11 and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 45–49 for additional information.
| | Selected Consolidated balance sheets data (continued) | Selected Consolidated balance sheets data (continued) | | Selected Consolidated balance sheets data (continued) | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| Change |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| Change |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 1,525,261 |
| | $ | 1,470,666 |
| 4 | % | $ | 1,836,009 |
| | $ | 1,562,431 |
| 18 | % |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 247,766 |
| | 182,320 |
| 36 |
| 233,207 |
| | 183,675 |
| 27 |
|
Short-term borrowings | 48,893 |
| | 69,276 |
| (29 | ) | 51,909 |
| | 40,920 |
| 27 |
|
Trading liabilities | 138,343 |
| | 144,773 |
| (4 | ) | 184,196 |
| | 119,277 |
| 54 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 225,063 |
| | 196,710 |
| 14 |
| 253,874 |
| | 210,407 |
| 21 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) | 18,515 |
| | 20,241 |
| (9 | ) | 19,630 |
| | 17,841 |
| 10 |
|
Long-term debt | 296,472 |
| | 282,031 |
| 5 |
| 299,344 |
| | 291,498 |
| 3 |
|
Total liabilities | 2,500,313 |
| | 2,366,017 |
| 6 |
| 2,878,169 |
| | 2,426,049 |
| 19 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 264,348 |
| | 256,515 |
| 3 |
| 261,262 |
| | 261,330 |
| — |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,764,661 |
| | $ | 2,622,532 |
| 5 | % | $ | 3,139,431 |
| | $ | 2,687,379 |
| 17 | % |
Deposits increased reflecting:
driven by significant inflows in CIB, CB and AWM as clients focused on increasing their cash balances as a result of changes in market conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Deposits also increased in CCB due to seasonal growth in operating deposits in CIB driven by client activity in Treasury Servicesexisting and Securities Services, and an increase in net issuances of structured notes in Markets, and
in CCB, predominantly due to continued growth in new accounts, and in CB, growth from existing clients.accounts.
Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 and Notes 2 and 1516 for additional information.
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements increased driven by CIBfrom client-driven market-making activities as a result of changes in market conditions in March and includes the Firm’s participation in the Federal Reserve’s open market operations, as well as higher secured financing of trading assets-debt instruments and client-driven activities.when compared with lower levels at year-end in CIB. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 and Note 1011 for additional information.
Short-term borrowings decreased reflecting lower commercial paper and short-term increased driven by the Firm’s participation in the FRBB’s MMLF. The nonrecourse advances from Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”)the FRBB funded the assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients related to the MMLF, which are recorded in Treasury and CIO, primarily driven by liquidity management.other assets. Refer to Regulatory Developments Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic on pages 10-11 and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 for additional information.
Trading liabilities decreased as a result ofincreased due to client-driven market-making activities in CIB, which resulted in lowerhigher levels of short positions primarily in both debt and equity instruments in Equity Markets.Markets, as well as higher derivative payables as a result of market movements, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Refer to Notes 2 and 45 for additional information.
Accounts payable and other liabilities increased reflecting:
reflecting higher client payables related to client-driven activities in CIB andduring a period of heightened market volatility.
the impact of the adoption of the new lease accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019.
Refer to Note 16 for additional information on Leases.
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs decreasedincreased due to:
maturities of credit card securitizations,
predominantly offset by
to higher levels of Firm-administered multi-seller conduit commercial paper issued to third parties.parties, partially offset by activity in municipal bond vehicles.
Refer to Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements on page 18 and Notes 1314 and 2223 for further information on Firm-sponsored VIEs and loan securitization trusts.
Long-term debt increased as a result of client-driven
higher FHLB advances and an increase in senior debt reflecting fair value hedge accounting adjustments related to lower interest rates, partially offset by net issuancesmaturities in Treasury and CIO,
partially offset by
a decrease in the fair value of structured notes in CIB’s Markets business.CIB related to market movements in March.
Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 for additional information on the Firm’s long-term debt activities.
Stockholders’ equity was flat reflecting the net impact of capital actions, net income, the adoption of CECL and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). The increase in AOCI was driven by higher valuation of interest rate cash flow hedges, debit valuation adjustment on fair value option-elected liabilities, and net unrealized gains on AFS securities. Refer to page 83 for information on changes in stockholders’ equity and Capital actions on pages 47–48.42–43.
Consolidated cash flows analysis
The following is a discussion of cash flow activities during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. | | (in millions) | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | (77,039 | ) | | $ | 13,765 |
| | $ | (120,772 | ) | | $ | (80,880 | ) |
Investing activities | | (38,181 | ) | | (39,782 | ) | | (135,150 | ) | | 36,301 |
|
Financing activities | | 96,006 |
| | 16,319 |
| | 362,305 |
| | 69,435 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | (2,982 | ) | | (2,509 | ) | | (2,480 | ) | | (1,045 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks | | $ | (22,196 | ) | | $ | (12,207 | ) | |
Net increase in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks | | | $ | 103,903 |
| | $ | 23,811 |
|
Operating activities
In 2019,2020, cash used primarily resulted from higher trading assets, securities borrowed, other assets and accrued interest and accounts receivable, partially offset by higher trading liabilities and accounts payable and other liabilities.
In 2019, cash used primarily resulted from higher trading assets-debt and equity instruments and securities borrowed, partially offset by increased trading liabilities tradingand accounts payable and other liabilities, and net proceeds from loans originated for sale.
In 2018, cash provided primarily resulted from net income, higher accounts payable and other liabilities, and trading liabilities, partially offset by higher trading assets and securities borrowed.held-for-sale.
Investing activities
In 2019,2020, cash used primarily resulted from net purchases of investment securities, and net loan originations, predominantly offset by lower securities purchased under resale agreements, and proceeds from the sale of loans held-for-investment.
In 2018, cash used resulted from higher net loan originations and an increase in securities purchasedpurchases of assets from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided by the FRBB under resale agreements, partially offset by net proceeds from investment securities and sales of loans held-for- investment.
Financing activitiesthe MMLF.
In 2019, cash provided resulted from a decrease in securities purchased under resale agreements, and net proceeds from sales of loans held-for-investment.
Financing activities
In 2020, cash provided resulted from higher deposits, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, partially offsetand net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings, which included the non-recourse advances provided by lower short-term and long-term borrowings.the FRBB.
In 2018,2019, cash provided resulted from higher securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements deposits and short-term borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in long-term borrowings.higher deposits.
For both periods, cash was used for repurchases of common stock and cash dividends on common and preferred stock. On March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases through the second quarter of 2020.
* * *
Refer to Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 15-16, Capital Risk Management on pages 45–49,39–44, and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 of this Form 10-Q, and pages 95–10093–98 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the activities affecting the Firm’s cash flows.
|
| | | | |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS |
In the normal course of business, the Firm enters into various off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Certain obligations are recognized on-balance sheet, while others are disclosed as off-balance sheet under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”).
The Firm has several types of off–balance sheet arrangements, including through nonconsolidated special-purpose entities (“SPEs”), which are a type of VIE, and through lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees).
The Firm holds capital, as appropriate, against all SPE-related transactions and related exposures, such as derivative contracts and lending-related commitments and guarantees.
The Firm has no commitments to issue its own stock to support any SPE transaction, and its policies require that transactions with SPEs be conducted at arm’s length and reflect market pricing. Consistent with this policy, no JPMorgan Chase employee is permitted to invest in SPEs with which the Firm is involved where such investment would violate the Firm’s Code of Conduct.
The table below provides an index of where in this Form 10-Q a discussion of the Firm’s various off-balance sheet arrangements can be found. In addition, referRefer to Note 1 for additional information about the Firm’s consolidation policies.
|
| | |
Type of off-balance sheet arrangement | Location of disclosure | Page references |
Special-purpose entities: variable interests and other obligations, including contingent obligations, arising from variable interests in nonconsolidated VIEs | Refer to Note 1314 | 139-144145-150 |
Off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees, and other commitments | Refer to Note 2223 | 156-159161-164 |
|
|
EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF THE FIRM’S USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES |
The Firm prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and this presentation is referred to as “reported” basis; these financial statements appear on pages 80–84.
In addition to analyzing the Firm’s results on a reported basis, the Firm also reviews and uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the Firmwide and segment level. These non-GAAP measures include:
Firmwide “managed” basis results, including the overhead ratio, which include certain reclassifications to present total net revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities (“FTE” basis)
Pre-provision profit, which represents total net revenue less noninterest expense
Net interest income and net yield excluding CIB’s Markets businesses
Certain credit metrics and ratios, which exclude PCI loans
Tangible common equity (“TCE”), ROTCE, and TBVPS.TBVPS
In addition, coreAllowance for loan losses to period-end loans is a key performance measure utilized by the Firmretained, excluding trade finance and its investors and analysts in assessing actual growth in the loan portfolio.conduits.
Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use Of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 57-5957–59 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of management’s use of non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures.
The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results to managed basis. | | | Three months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
(in millions, except ratios) | Reported results | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis | | Reported results | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis | Reported | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis | | Reported | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis |
Other income | $ | 1,472 |
| | $ | 596 |
| | $ | 2,068 |
| | $ | 1,160 |
| | $ | 408 |
| | $ | 1,568 |
| $ | 1,156 |
| | $ | 708 |
| | $ | 1,864 |
| | $ | 1,475 |
| | $ | 585 |
| | $ | 2,060 |
|
Total noninterest revenue | 15,113 |
| | 596 |
| | 15,709 |
| | 13,352 |
| | 408 |
| | 13,760 |
| 13,812 |
| | 708 |
| | 14,520 |
| | 14,670 |
| | 585 |
| | 15,255 |
|
Net interest income | 14,228 |
| | 127 |
| | 14,355 |
| | 13,908 |
| | 154 |
| | 14,062 |
| 14,439 |
| | 110 |
| | 14,549 |
| | 14,453 |
| | 143 |
| | 14,596 |
|
Total net revenue | 29,341 |
| | 723 |
| | 30,064 |
| | 27,260 |
| | 562 |
| | 27,822 |
| 28,251 |
| | 818 |
| | 29,069 |
| | 29,123 |
| | 728 |
| | 29,851 |
|
Total noninterest expense | | 16,850 |
| | NA |
| | 16,850 |
| | 16,395 |
| | NA |
| | 16,395 |
|
Pre-provision profit | 12,919 |
| | 723 |
| | 13,642 |
| | 11,637 |
| | 562 |
| | 12,199 |
| 11,401 |
| | 818 |
| | 12,219 |
| | 12,728 |
| | 728 |
| | 13,456 |
|
Provision for credit losses | | 8,285 |
| | NA |
| | 8,285 |
| | 1,495 |
| | NA |
| | 1,495 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 11,405 |
| | 723 |
| | 12,128 |
| | 10,689 |
| | 562 |
| | 11,251 |
| 3,116 |
| | 818 |
| | 3,934 |
| | 11,233 |
| | 728 |
| | 11,961 |
|
Income tax expense | $ | 2,325 |
| | $ | 723 |
| | $ | 3,048 |
| | $ | 2,309 |
| | $ | 562 |
| | $ | 2,871 |
| 251 |
| | 818 |
| | 1,069 |
| | 2,054 |
| | 728 |
| | 2,782 |
|
Net income | | $ | 2,865 |
| | NA |
| | $ | 2,865 |
| | $ | 9,179 |
| | NA |
| | $ | 9,179 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Overhead ratio | 56 | % | | NM |
| | 55 | % | | 57 | % | | NM |
| | 56 | % | 60 | % | | NM |
| | 58 | % | | 56 | % | | NM |
| | 55 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Reported results | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis | | Reported results | | Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(a) | | Managed basis | |
Other income | $ | 4,239 |
| | $ | 1,777 |
| | $ | 6,016 |
| | $ | 4,041 |
| | $ | 1,337 |
| | $ | 5,378 |
| |
Total noninterest revenue | 44,217 |
| | 1,777 |
| | 45,994 |
| | 42,215 |
| | 1,337 |
| | 43,552 |
| |
Net interest income | 43,079 |
| | 408 |
| | 43,487 |
| | 40,705 |
| | 473 |
| | 41,178 |
| |
Total net revenue | 87,296 |
| | 2,185 |
| | 89,481 |
| | 82,920 |
| | 1,810 |
| | 84,730 |
| |
Pre-provision profit | 38,138 |
| | 2,185 |
| | 40,323 |
| | 35,246 |
| | 1,810 |
| | 37,056 |
| |
Income before income tax expense | 33,980 |
| | 2,185 |
| | 36,165 |
| | 31,923 |
| | 1,810 |
| | 33,733 |
| |
Income tax expense | $ | 6,069 |
| | $ | 2,185 |
| | $ | 8,254 |
| | $ | 6,515 |
| | $ | 1,810 |
| | $ | 8,325 |
| |
Overhead ratio | 56 | % | | NM |
| | 55 | % | | 57 | % | | NM |
| | 56 | % | |
| |
(a) | Predominantly recognized in CIB, CB and Corporate. |
The following table provides information on net interest income and net yield excluding CIB’s Markets businesses.
| |
(in millions, except rates) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 | 2018 | | Change | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Net interest income – reported | $ | 14,228 |
| $ | 13,908 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 43,079 |
| $ | 40,705 |
| | 6 | % | $ | 14,439 |
| $ | 14,453 |
| | — | % |
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments | 127 |
| 154 |
| | (18 | ) | | 408 |
| 473 |
| | (14 | ) | 110 |
| 143 |
| | (23 | ) |
Net interest income – managed basis(a) | $ | 14,355 |
| $ | 14,062 |
| | 2 |
| | $ | 43,487 |
| $ | 41,178 |
| | 6 |
| $ | 14,549 |
| $ | 14,596 |
| | — |
|
Less: CIB Markets net interest income(b) | 723 |
| 704 |
| | 3 |
| | 1,971 |
| 2,488 |
| | (21 | ) | 1,596 |
| 624 |
| | 156 |
|
Net interest income excluding CIB Markets(a) | $ | 13,632 |
| $ | 13,358 |
| | 2 |
| | $ | 41,516 |
| $ | 38,690 |
| | 7 |
| $ | 12,953 |
| $ | 13,972 |
| | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Average interest-earning assets(c) | $ | 2,365,154 |
| $ | 2,203,305 |
| | 7 |
| | $ | 2,334,623 |
| $ | 2,198,909 |
| | 6 |
| $ | 2,465,732 |
| $ | 2,298,894 |
| | 7 |
|
Less: Average CIB Markets interest-earning assets(c)(b) | 690,593 |
| 596,784 |
| | 16 |
| | 671,236 |
| 589,185 |
| | 14 |
| 736,035 |
| 649,180 |
| | 13 |
|
Average interest-earning assets excluding CIB Markets | $ | 1,674,561 |
| $ | 1,606,521 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 1,663,387 |
| $ | 1,609,724 |
| | 3 | % | $ | 1,729,697 |
| $ | 1,649,714 |
| | 5 | % |
Net interest yield on average interest-earning assets – managed basis(c) | 2.41 | % | 2.53 | % | | | | 2.49 | % | 2.50 | % | | | |
Net interest yield on average CIB Markets interest-earning assets(b)(c) | 0.42 |
| 0.47 |
| | | | 0.39 |
| 0.56 |
| | | |
Net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding CIB Markets | 3.23 | % | 3.30 | % | | | | 3.34 | % | 3.21 | % | | | |
Net yield on average interest-earning assets – managed basis | | 2.37 | % | 2.57 | % | | |
Net yield on average CIB Markets interest-earning assets(b) | | 0.87 |
| 0.39 |
| | |
Net yield on average interest-earning assets excluding CIB Markets | | 3.01 | % | 3.43 | % | | |
| |
(a) | Interest includes the effect of related hedges. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. |
| |
(b) | Refer to page 3229 for further information on CIB’s Markets businesses. |
| |
(c) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm reclassified balances related to certain instruments from interest-earning to noninterest-earning assets, as the associated returns are recorded in principal transactions revenue and not in net interest income. These changes were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firm’s common stockholders’ equity to TCE.
| | | Period-end | | Average | Period-end | | Average |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Common stockholders’ equity | $ | 235,985 |
| $ | 230,447 |
| | $ | 235,613 |
| $ | 230,439 |
| $ | 232,917 |
| $ | 228,995 |
| $ | 231,199 |
| $ | 234,337 |
| | $ | 234,530 |
| $ | 230,051 |
|
Less: Goodwill | 47,818 |
| 47,471 |
| | 47,707 |
| 47,490 |
| 47,552 |
| 47,496 |
| 47,800 |
| 47,823 |
| | 47,812 |
| 47,475 |
|
Less: Other intangible assets | 841 |
| 748 |
| | 842 |
| 795 |
| 776 |
| 820 |
| 800 |
| 819 |
| | 812 |
| 744 |
|
Add: Certain Deferred tax liabilities(a) | 2,371 |
| 2,280 |
| | 2,344 |
| 2,233 |
| 2,311 |
| 2,221 |
| 2,389 |
| 2,381 |
| | 2,385 |
| 2,287 |
|
Tangible common equity | $ | 189,697 |
| $ | 184,508 |
| | $ | 189,408 |
| $ | 184,387 |
| $ | 186,900 |
| $ | 182,900 |
| $ | 184,988 |
| $ | 188,076 |
| | $ | 188,291 |
| $ | 184,119 |
|
| | | | | | |
Return on tangible common equity | NA |
| NA |
| | 18 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % | 18 | % | NA |
| NA |
| | 5 | % | 19 | % |
Tangible book value per share | $ | 60.48 |
| $ | 56.33 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| $ | 60.71 |
| $ | 60.98 |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
| |
(a) | Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating TCE. |
The Firm is managed on a line of businessan LOB basis. There are four major reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking, Corporate & Investment Bank, Commercial Banking and Asset & Wealth Management. In addition, there is a Corporate segment.
The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 19–20 for a definition of managed basis.
Description of business segment reporting methodology
Results of the business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain
income and expense items. Refer to Line of business equity on page 47 for further information about line of business capital. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and further refinements may be implemented in future periods.
Revenue sharing
When business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients, the participating business segments may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue and expense are generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segment(s) involved in the transaction. The segment results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements.
Business segment capital allocation
The amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity. On at least an annual basis,Periodically, the assumptions and methodologies used into allocate capital allocation are assessed and as a result, the capital allocated to lines of businessthe LOBs may change. Refer to Line of business equity on page 9190 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on business segment capital allocation.
Refer to Business Segment Results – Description of business segment reporting methodology on pages 60–61 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of those methodologies.
Business segment changes
In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm began reporting a Wholesale Payments business unit within CIB following a realignment of the Firm’s wholesale payments businesses. The Wholesale Payments business comprises:
Merchant Services, which was realigned from CCB to CIB
Treasury Services and Trade Finance in CIB. Trade Finance was previously reported in Lending in CIB.
In connection with the alignment of Wholesale Payments, the assets, liabilities and headcount associated with the Merchant Services business were realigned to CIB from CCB, and the revenue and expenses of the Merchant Services business is reported across CCB, CIB and CB based primarily on client relationships. Prior periods have been revised to reflect this realignment and revised allocation methodology.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| JPMorgan Chase |
| |
| Consumer Businesses | | Wholesale Businesses |
| |
| Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking | | Asset & Wealth Management |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer & Business Banking | | Home Lending | | Card & Auto | | Banking | | Markets & Securities Services | | • Middle Market Banking | | • Asset Management |
| • Consumer Banking/Chase Wealth Management • Business Banking | • Home Lending Production • Home Lending Servicing • Real Estate Portfolios | • Credit Card • Auto
| • Investment Banking • Wholesale Payments • Lending | • Fixed Income Markets | • Corporate Client Banking | • Wealth Management
|
| • Equity Markets • Securities Services • Credit Adjustments & Other | • Commercial Real Estate Banking |
|
|
Segment results – managed basis
The following tables summarize the Firm’s results by segment for the periods indicated.
| | Three months ended September 30, | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking | |
Three months ended March 31, | | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 14,259 |
| $ | 13,290 |
| 7 | | $ | 9,338 |
| $ | 8,805 |
| 6 | | $ | 2,207 |
| $ | 2,271 |
| (3 | )% | $ | 13,171 |
| $ | 13,490 |
| (2 | )% | | $ | 9,948 |
| $ | 10,034 |
| (1 | )% | | $ | 2,178 |
| $ | 2,413 |
| (10 | )% |
Total noninterest expense | 7,290 |
| 6,982 |
| 4 | | 5,348 |
| 5,175 |
| 3 | | 881 |
| 853 |
| 3 |
| 7,161 |
| 6,970 |
| 3 |
| | 5,896 |
| 5,629 |
| 5 |
| | 988 |
| 938 |
| 5 |
|
Pre-provision profit/(loss) | 6,969 |
| 6,308 |
| 10 | | 3,990 |
| 3,630 |
| 10 | | 1,326 |
| 1,418 |
| (6 | ) | 6,010 |
| 6,520 |
| (8 | ) | | 4,052 |
| 4,405 |
| (8 | ) | | 1,190 |
| 1,475 |
| (19 | ) |
Provision for credit losses | 1,311 |
| 980 |
| 34 | | 92 |
| (42 | ) | NM | | 67 |
| (15 | ) | NM |
| 5,772 |
| 1,314 |
| 339 |
| | 1,401 |
| 87 |
| NM |
| | 1,010 |
| 90 |
| NM |
|
Net income/(loss) | 4,273 |
| 4,086 |
| 5 | | 2,809 |
| 2,626 |
| 7 | | 937 |
| 1,089 |
| (14 | ) | 191 |
| 3,947 |
| (95 | ) | | 1,988 |
| 3,260 |
| (39 | ) | | 147 |
| 1,060 |
| (86 | ) |
Return on equity (“ROE”) | 32 | % | 31 | % | | 13 | % | 14 | % | | 16 | % | 21 | % | | 1 | % | 30 | % | | | 9 | % | 16 | % | | | 2 | % | 19 | % | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | Asset & Wealth Management | | Corporate | | Total | |
Three months ended March 31, | | Asset & Wealth Management | | Corporate | | Total |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change | | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 3,568 |
| $ | 3,559 |
| — |
| | $ | 692 |
| $ | (103 | ) | NM | | $ | 30,064 |
| $ | 27,822 |
| 8 | $ | 3,606 |
| $ | 3,489 |
| 3 | | $ | 166 |
| $ | 425 |
| (61 | )% | | $ | 29,069 |
| $ | 29,851 |
| (3 | )% |
Total noninterest expense | 2,622 |
| 2,585 |
| 1 |
| | 281 |
| 28 |
| NM | | 16,422 |
| 15,623 |
| 5 | 2,659 |
| 2,647 |
| — | | 146 |
| 211 |
| (31 | ) | | 16,850 |
| 16,395 |
| 3 |
|
Pre-provision profit/(loss) | 946 |
| 974 |
| (3 | ) | | 411 |
| (131 | ) | NM | | 13,642 |
| 12,199 |
| 12 | 947 |
| 842 |
| 12 | | 20 |
| 214 |
| (91 | ) | | 12,219 |
| 13,456 |
| (9 | ) |
Provision for credit losses | 44 |
| 23 |
| 91 |
| | — |
| 2 |
| NM | | 1,514 |
| 948 |
| 60 | 94 |
| 2 |
| NM | | 8 |
| 2 |
| 300 |
| | 8,285 |
| 1,495 |
| 454 |
|
Net income/(loss) | 668 |
| 724 |
| (8 | ) | | 393 |
| (145 | ) | NM | | 9,080 |
| 8,380 |
| 8 | 664 |
| 661 |
| — | | (125 | ) | 251 |
| NM |
| | 2,865 |
| 9,179 |
| (69 | ) |
ROE | 24 | % | 31 | % | | | NM |
| NM |
| | 15 | % | 14 | % | | 25 | % | 25 | % | | NM |
| NM |
| | | 4 | % | 16 | % | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 41,843 |
| $ | 38,384 |
| 9 | | $ | 28,827 |
| $ | 29,211 |
| (1 | )% | | $ | 6,756 |
| $ | 6,753 |
| — |
|
Total noninterest expense | 21,663 |
| 20,770 |
| 4 | | 16,288 |
| 16,237 |
| — |
| | 2,618 |
| 2,541 |
| 3 |
|
Pre-provision profit/(loss) | 20,180 |
| 17,614 |
| 15 | | 12,539 |
| 12,974 |
| (3 | ) | | 4,138 |
| 4,212 |
| (2 | ) |
Provision for credit losses | 3,745 |
| 3,405 |
| 10 | | 179 |
| (142 | ) | NM |
| | 186 |
| 23 |
| NM |
|
Net income/(loss) | 12,410 |
| 10,824 |
| 15 | | 8,995 |
| 9,798 |
| (8 | ) | | 2,986 |
| 3,201 |
| (7 | ) |
ROE | 31 | % | 27 | % | | | 14 | % | 18 | % | | | 17 | % | 20 | % | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | Asset & Wealth Management | | Corporate | | Total |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 10,616 |
| $ | 10,637 |
| — |
| | $ | 1,439 |
| $ | (255 | ) | NM | | $ | 89,481 |
| $ | 84,730 |
| 6 | % |
Total noninterest expense | 7,865 |
| 7,732 |
| 2 |
| | 724 |
| 394 |
| 84 | | 49,158 |
| 47,674 |
| 3 |
|
Pre-provision profit/(loss) | 2,751 |
| 2,905 |
| (5 | ) | | 715 |
| (649 | ) | NM | | 40,323 |
| 37,056 |
| 9 |
|
Provision for credit losses | 48 |
| 40 |
| 20 |
| | — |
| (3 | ) | NM | | 4,158 |
| 3,323 |
| 25 |
|
Net income/(loss) | 2,048 |
| 2,249 |
| (9 | ) | | 1,472 |
| (664 | ) | NM | | 27,911 |
| 25,408 |
| 10 |
|
ROE | 25 | % | 32 | % | | | NM |
| NM |
| | | 15 | % | 14 | % | |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.The following sections provide a comparative discussion of the Firm’s results by segment as of or for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus the corresponding periods in the prior year, unless otherwise specified.
|
| | | | |
CONSUMER & COMMUNITY BANKING |
|
|
Consumer & Community Banking offers services to consumers and businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Consumer & Business Banking (including Consumer Banking/Chase Wealth Management and Business Banking), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card & Auto. Consumer & Business Banking offers deposit and investment products and services to consumers, and lending, deposit, and cash management and payment solutions to small businesses. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card & Auto issues credit cards to consumers and small businesses and originates and services auto loans and leases. |
Refer to pages 62–65 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K and Line of Business Metrics on page 173177 for a discussion of the business profile of CCB.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Revenue | | | | | |
Lending- and deposit-related fees(a) | $ | 972 |
| | $ | 909 |
| | 7 | % |
Asset management, administration and commissions(a) | 585 |
| | 581 |
| | 1 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income | 320 |
| | 396 |
| | (19 | ) |
Card income | 768 |
| | 909 |
| | (16 | ) |
All other income | 1,373 |
| | 1,290 |
| | 6 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 4,018 |
| | 4,085 |
| | (2 | ) |
Net interest income | 9,153 |
| | 9,405 |
| | (3 | ) |
Total net revenue | 13,171 |
| | 13,490 |
| | (2 | ) |
| | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 5,772 |
| | 1,314 |
| | 339 |
|
| | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 2,597 |
| | 2,566 |
| | 1 |
|
Noncompensation expense(b) | 4,564 |
| | 4,404 |
| | 4 |
|
Total noninterest expense | 7,161 |
| | 6,970 |
| | 3 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 238 |
| | 5,206 |
| | (95 | ) |
Income tax expense | 47 |
| | 1,259 |
| | (96 | ) |
Net income | $ | 191 |
| | $ | 3,947 |
| | (95 | ) |
| | | | | |
Revenue by line of business | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | $ | 6,091 |
| | $ | 6,661 |
| | (9 | ) |
Home Lending | 1,161 |
| | 1,346 |
| | (14 | ) |
Card & Auto | 5,919 |
| | 5,483 |
| | 8 |
|
| | | | | |
Mortgage fees and related income details: | | | | | |
Net production revenue | 319 |
| | 200 |
| | 60 |
|
Net mortgage servicing revenue(c) | 1 |
| | 196 |
| | (99 | ) |
Mortgage fees and related income | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | (19 | )% |
| | | | | |
Financial ratios | | | | | |
Return on equity | 1 | % | | 30 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 54 |
| | 52 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lending- and deposit-related fees | $ | 1,026 |
| | $ | 936 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 2,827 |
| | $ | 2,668 |
| | 6 | % |
Asset management, administration and commissions | 608 |
| | 626 |
| | (3 | ) | | 1,890 |
| | 1,792 |
| | 5 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income | 886 |
| | 260 |
| | 241 |
| | 1,561 |
| | 1,049 |
| | 49 |
|
Card income | 1,176 |
| | 1,219 |
| | (4 | ) | | 3,601 |
| | 3,299 |
| | 9 |
|
All other income | 1,399 |
| | 1,135 |
| | 23 |
| | 3,989 |
| | 3,255 |
| | 23 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 5,095 |
| | 4,176 |
| | 22 |
| | 13,868 |
| | 12,063 |
| | 15 |
|
Net interest income | 9,164 |
| | 9,114 |
| | 1 |
| | 27,975 |
| | 26,321 |
| | 6 |
|
Total net revenue | 14,259 |
| | 13,290 |
| | 7 |
| | 41,843 |
| | 38,384 |
| | 9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 1,311 |
| | 980 |
| | 34 |
| | 3,745 |
| | 3,405 |
| | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 2,683 |
| | 2,635 |
| | 2 |
| | 8,063 |
| | 7,916 |
| | 2 |
|
Noncompensation expense(a) | 4,607 |
| | 4,347 |
| | 6 |
| | 13,600 |
| | 12,854 |
| | 6 |
|
Total noninterest expense | 7,290 |
| | 6,982 |
| | 4 |
| | 21,663 |
| | 20,770 |
| | 4 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 5,658 |
| | 5,328 |
| | 6 |
| | 16,435 |
| | 14,209 |
| | 16 |
|
Income tax expense | 1,385 |
| | 1,242 |
| | 12 |
| | 4,025 |
| | 3,385 |
| | 19 |
|
Net income | $ | 4,273 |
| | $ | 4,086 |
| | 5 |
| | $ | 12,410 |
| | $ | 10,824 |
| | 15 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue by line of business | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | $ | 6,688 |
| | $ | 6,385 |
| | 5 |
| | $ | 20,053 |
| | $ | 18,238 |
| | 10 |
|
Home Lending | 1,465 |
| | 1,306 |
| | 12 |
| | 3,929 |
| | 4,162 |
| | (6 | ) |
Card, Merchant Services & Auto | 6,106 |
| | 5,599 |
| | 9 |
| | 17,861 |
| | 15,984 |
| | 12 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage fees and related income details: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net production revenue | 738 |
| | 108 |
| | NM |
| | 1,291 |
| | 296 |
| | 336 |
|
Net mortgage servicing revenue(b) | 148 |
| | 152 |
| | (3 | ) | | 270 |
| | 753 |
| | (64 | ) |
Mortgage fees and related income | $ | 886 |
| | $ | 260 |
| | 241 | % | | $ | 1,561 |
| | $ | 1,049 |
| | 49 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial ratios | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on equity | 32 | % | | 31 | % | | | | 31 | % | | 27 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 51 |
| | 53 |
| | | | 52 |
| | 54 |
| | |
Note: In the discussion andfirst quarter of 2020, the tables which follow,Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB presents certain financial measures which excludeto CIB as part of the impact of PCI loans; these are non-GAAP financial measures.Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
| |
(a) | Included operating lease depreciation expenseIn the first quarter of $1.0 billion2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and $862 million forcommissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $3.0 billion and $2.5 billion for nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.current presentation. |
| |
(b) | Included MSR risk management resultsdepreciation expense on leased assets of $53 million$1.1 billion and $(88)$967 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively and $(200)respectively. |
| |
(c) | Included MSR risk management results of $(90) million and $(94)$(9) million for ninethe three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $4.3 billion,$191 million, a decrease of 95%, predominantly driven by an increase of 5%.in the provision for credit losses.
Net revenue was $14.3$13.2 billion, an increasea decrease of 7%2%. Net production revenue included approximately $350 million of gains on the sale of certain mortgage loans that were predominantly offset by a charge in net interest income for the unwind of the related internal funding from Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) associated with these loans. The charge reflects the net present value of that funding and is recognized as interest income in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Corporate on pages 42–43 of this Form 10-Q and Funds Transfer Pricing (“FTP”) on page 60 of the Firm’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information.
Net interest income was $9.2 billion, up 1%down 3%, driven by:
the impact of deposit margin compression, partially offset by growth in deposit balances in CBB, and includes the charge from the
lower loan balances in Home Lending predominantly due to prior year loan sales, mentioned above. Excluding this charge, net interest income increased, driven by:
largely offset by
higher loan balances and margin expansion in Card, as well as growth in deposit balances and higher deposit margins in CBB,
partially offset by
lower loan balances due to loan sales, as well as loan spread compression in Home Lending.Card.
Noninterest revenue was $5.1$4.0 billion, up 22%down 2%, driven by:
lower card income due to lower net interchange income reflecting higher rewards costs and includes the gain from the loanpartner payments, partially offset by higher card sales mentioned above. Excluding this gain, noninterestvolume, despite a decline in March, and
lower net mortgage servicing revenue increased, driven by:reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates and a lower level of third-party loans serviced, as well as lower MSR risk management results,
predominantly offset by
higher net mortgage production revenue reflecting higher production volumes and margins, and the absence of a gain on a loan sale in the prior year,
higher auto lease volume, and
net mortgage servicing revenue, which remained relatively flat, reflecting lower operating revenue driven by the impact of reclassifying certain loans to held-for-sale and faster prepayment speeds on lower rates, offset by favorable MSR risk management results.higher deposit-related fees.
Refer to Note 1415 for further information regarding changes in value of the MSR asset and related hedges, and mortgage fees and related income.
Noninterest expense was $7.3$7.2 billion, up 4%3%, predominantly driven by:
technology, marketinghigher volume- and otherrevenue-related expense, including depreciation on auto lease assets, and investments in the business, as well as higher auto lease depreciation,
partially offset by
expense efficiencies and lower FDIC charges.structural expense.
The provision for credit losses was $1.3$5.8 billion, an increase of 34%, reflecting:
an increase$4.5 billion, driven by additions to the allowance for credit losses reflecting deterioration in credit card due to
| |
– | higher net charge-offs on loan growth, in line with expectations, and |
| |
– | a $200 million addition to the allowance for loan losses reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger partthe macroeconomic environment as a result of the portfolio, compared to a $150 million addition in the prior year |
an increase in consumer, excluding credit card due to
| |
– | a $100 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio, compared to a $250 million reduction in the PCI residential real estate portfolio in the prior year, and |
| |
– | lower net recoveries in the residential real estate portfolio as the prior year benefited from a larger recovery on a loan sale |
partially offset by
| |
– | a $50 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the business banking portfolio. |
Year-to-date results
Net income was $12.4 billion, an increase of 15%.
Net revenue was $41.8 billion, an increase of 9%. Net production revenue included gains on sales of certain mortgage loans that were predominantly offset by charges in net interest income for the unwind of the related internal funding from Treasury and CIO associated with these loans.
Net interest income was $28.0 billion, up 6%, and includes charges from the loan sales mentioned above. Excluding these charges, net interest income increased, driven by:
higher deposit margins and growth in deposit balances in CBB, as well as higher loan balances and margin expansion in Card,
partially offset by
lower loan balances due to loan sales, as well as loan spread compression in Home Lending.
Noninterest revenue was $13.9 billion, up 15%, and includes gains from the loan sales mentioned above. Excluding these gains, noninterest revenue increased, driven by:
higher auto lease volume,
higher net mortgage production revenue reflecting higher production margins and volumes, and
the impact of the prior-year adjustmentCOVID-19 pandemic, consisting of:
$3.8 billion for Card, $300 million for Home Lending, $250 million for Auto and $159 million in CBB
net charge-offs were flat reflecting higher net charge-offs in Card on loan growth, in line with prior expectations, offset by higher recoveries in Home Lending on a current period loan sale.
Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 50–66 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 64–65 for further discussions of approximately $330 million to the credit card rewards liability,
partially offset by
lower net mortgage servicing revenue driven by
| |
– | lower operating revenue reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates and the impact of reclassifying certain loans to held-for-sale, as well as |
| |
– | lower MSR risk management results reflecting updates to model inputs. |
Noninterest expense was $21.7 billion, up 4%, driven by:
technology, marketingportfolios and other investments in the business, as well as higher auto lease depreciation,
partially offset by
expense efficiencies and lower FDIC charges.allowance for credit losses.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 506,147 |
| | $ | 539,127 |
| | (6 | )% |
Loans: | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 27,709 |
| | 26,492 |
| | 5 |
|
Home Lending | 196,401 |
| | 230,599 |
| | (15 | ) |
Card | 154,021 |
| | 150,527 |
| | 2 |
|
Auto | 61,468 |
| | 62,786 |
| | (2 | ) |
Total loans | 439,599 |
| | 470,404 |
| | (7 | ) |
Deposits | 775,068 |
| | 702,587 |
| | 10 |
|
Equity | 52,000 |
| | 52,000 |
| | — |
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 517,213 |
| | $ | 546,042 |
| | (5 | ) |
Loans: | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 27,261 |
| | 26,488 |
| | 3 |
|
Home Lending | 198,042 |
| | 238,949 |
| | (17 | ) |
Card | 162,660 |
| | 151,134 |
| | 8 |
|
Auto | 60,893 |
| | 62,763 |
| | (3 | ) |
Total loans | 448,856 |
| | 479,334 |
| | (6 | ) |
Deposits | 733,648 |
| | 681,013 |
| | 8 |
|
Equity | 52,000 |
| | 52,000 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
Headcount | 122,081 |
| | 124,305 |
| | (2 | )% |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The provision for credit losses was $3.7 billion, an increase of 10%, reflecting:
an increase in credit card dueprior-period amounts were revised to
| |
– | a $400 million addition to the allowance for loan losses reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger part of the portfolio and loan growth, compared to a $150 million addition in the prior year, and |
| |
– | higher net charge-offs on loan growth, in line with expectations |
partially offset by
conform with the current presentation, including a decrease in consumer, excluding credit card due to
| |
– | a $400 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the PCI residential real estate portfolio, reflecting continued improvement in home prices and delinquencies, and a $100 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio, compared to a $250 million reduction in the PCI residential real estate portfolio in the prior year, and |
| |
– | a $50 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses in the business banking portfolio |
largely offset by
| |
– | lower net recoveries in the residential real estate portfolio as the prior year benefited from larger recoveries on loan sales. |
period-end assets and headcount of $13.4 billion and 4,114, respectively, as of March 31, 2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratio data) | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans(a)(b) | $ | 4,008 |
|
| $ | 3,265 |
|
| 23 | % |
| | | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 74 |
| | 59 |
| | 25 |
|
Home Lending | (122 | ) | | (5 | ) | | NM |
|
Card | 1,313 |
| | 1,202 |
| | 9 |
|
Auto | 48 |
| | 58 |
| | (17 | ) |
Total net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 1,314 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 1.09 | % | | 0.90 | % | | |
Home Lending | (0.25 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | |
Card | 3.25 |
| | 3.23 |
| | |
Auto | 0.32 |
| | 0.37 |
| | |
Total net charge-off/(recovery) rate | 1.18 | % | | 1.11 | % | | |
| | | | | |
30+ day delinquency rate | | | | | |
Home Lending(c)(d) | 1.48 | % | | 1.62 | % | | |
Card | 1.96 |
| | 1.85 |
| | |
Auto | 0.89 |
| | 0.63 |
| | |
| | | | | |
90+ day delinquency rate — Card | 1.02 | % | | 0.97 | % | | |
| | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | $ | 882 |
| | $ | 796 |
| | 11 |
|
Home Lending | 2,137 |
| | 2,741 |
| | (22 | ) |
Card | 14,950 |
| | 5,183 |
| | 188 |
|
Auto | 732 |
| | 465 |
| | 57 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 18,701 |
| | $ | 9,185 |
| | 104 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 532,487 |
| | $ | 560,432 |
| | (5 | )% | | $ | 532,487 |
| | $ | 560,432 |
| | (5 | )% |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 26,699 |
| | 26,451 |
| | 1 |
| | 26,699 |
| | 26,451 |
| | 1 |
|
Home equity | 31,552 |
| | 37,461 |
| | (16 | ) | | 31,552 |
| | 37,461 |
| | (16 | ) |
Residential mortgage | 171,787 |
| | 205,389 |
| | (16 | ) | | 171,787 |
| | 205,389 |
| | (16 | ) |
Home Lending | 203,339 |
| | 242,850 |
| | (16 | ) | | 203,339 |
| | 242,850 |
| | (16 | ) |
Card | 159,571 |
| | 147,881 |
| | 8 |
| | 159,571 |
| | 147,881 |
| | 8 |
|
Auto | 61,410 |
| | 63,619 |
| | (3 | ) | | 61,410 |
| | 63,619 |
| | (3 | ) |
Total loans | 451,019 |
| | 480,801 |
| | (6 | ) | | 451,019 |
| | 480,801 |
| | (6 | ) |
Core loans | 405,662 |
| | 425,917 |
| | (5 | ) | | 405,662 |
| | 425,917 |
| | (5 | ) |
Deposits | 701,170 |
| | 677,260 |
| | 4 |
| | 701,170 |
| | 677,260 |
| | 4 |
|
Equity | 52,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 2 |
| | 52,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 2 |
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 538,500 |
| | $ | 551,080 |
| | (2 | ) | | $ | 544,833 |
| | $ | 544,931 |
| | — |
|
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 26,550 |
| | 26,351 |
| | 1 |
| | 26,537 |
| | 26,104 |
| | 2 |
|
Home equity | 32,215 |
| | 38,211 |
| | (16 | ) | | 33,694 |
| | 39,951 |
| | (16 | ) |
Residential mortgage | 181,157 |
| | 204,689 |
| | (11 | ) | | 191,881 |
| | 201,665 |
| | (5 | ) |
Home Lending | 213,372 |
| | 242,900 |
| | (12 | ) | | 225,575 |
| | 241,616 |
| | (7 | ) |
Card | 158,168 |
| | 146,272 |
| | 8 |
| | 154,375 |
| | 143,986 |
| | 7 |
|
Auto | 61,371 |
| | 64,060 |
| | (4 | ) | | 62,118 |
| | 65,096 |
| | (5 | ) |
Total loans | 459,461 |
| | 479,583 |
| | (4 | ) | | 468,605 |
| | 476,802 |
| | (2 | ) |
Core loans | 413,036 |
| | 422,582 |
| | (2 | ) | | 419,851 |
| | 415,662 |
| | 1 |
|
Deposits | 693,980 |
| | 674,211 |
| | 3 |
| | 688,676 |
| | 669,244 |
| | 3 |
|
Equity | 52,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 2 |
| | 52,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 2 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Headcount | 127,687 |
| | 129,891 |
| | (2 | )% | | 127,687 |
| | 129,891 |
| | (2 | )% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratio data) | 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
|
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans(a)(b) | $ | 3,099 |
|
| $ | 3,520 |
|
| (12 | )% |
| $ | 3,099 |
|
| $ | 3,520 |
|
| (12 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries)(c) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 79 |
| | 68 |
| | 16 |
| | 204 |
| | 171 |
| | 19 |
|
Home equity | (25 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (108 | ) | | (41 | ) | | (3 | ) | | NM |
|
Residential mortgage | (17 | ) | | (105 | ) | | 84 |
| | (34 | ) | | (252 | ) | | 87 |
|
Home Lending | (42 | ) | | (117 | ) | | 64 |
| | (75 | ) | | (255 | ) | | 71 |
|
Card | 1,175 |
| | 1,073 |
| | 10 |
| | 3,617 |
| | 3,407 |
| | 6 |
|
Auto | 49 |
| | 56 |
| | (13 | ) | | 149 |
| | 182 |
| | (18 | ) |
Total net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 1,261 |
| | $ | 1,080 |
| | 17 |
| | $ | 3,895 |
| | $ | 3,505 |
| | 11 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(c) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | 1.18 | % | | 1.02 | % | | | | 1.03 | % | | 0.88 | % | | |
Home equity(d) | (0.41 | ) | | (0.17 | ) | | | | (0.22 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | |
Residential mortgage(d) | (0.04 | ) | | (0.22 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | (0.18 | ) | | |
Home Lending(d) | (0.09 | ) | | (0.21 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | (0.16 | ) | | |
Card | 2.95 |
| | 2.91 |
| | | | 3.13 |
| | 3.16 |
| | |
Auto | 0.32 |
| | 0.35 |
| | | | 0.32 |
| | 0.37 |
| | |
Total net charge-off/(recovery) rate(d) | 1.16 |
| | 0.95 |
| | | | 1.17 |
| | 1.05 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
30+ day delinquency rate | | | | | | | | | | | |
Home Lending(e)(f) | 0.78 | % | | 0.81 | % | | | | 0.78 | % | | 0.81 | % | | |
Card | 1.84 |
| | 1.75 |
| | | | 1.84 |
| | 1.75 |
| | |
Auto | 0.88 |
| | 0.82 |
| | | | 0.88 |
| | 0.82 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
90+ day delinquency rate — Card | 0.90 |
| | 0.85 |
| | | | 0.90 |
| | 0.85 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | $ | 746 |
| | $ | 796 |
| | (6 | ) | | $ | 746 |
| | $ | 796 |
| | (6 | ) |
Home Lending, excluding PCI loans | 903 |
| | 1,003 |
| | (10 | ) | | 903 |
| | 1,003 |
| | (10 | ) |
Home Lending — PCI loans(c) | 1,256 |
| | 1,824 |
| | (31 | ) | | 1,256 |
| | 1,824 |
| | (31 | ) |
Card | 5,583 |
| | 5,034 |
| | 11 |
| | 5,583 |
| | 5,034 |
| | 11 |
|
Auto | 465 |
| | 464 |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | 464 |
| | — |
|
Total allowance for loan losses(c) | $ | 8,953 |
| | $ | 9,121 |
| | (2 | )% | | $ | 8,953 |
| | $ | 9,121 |
| | (2 | )% |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The adoption resulted in a change in the accounting for PCI loans, which are considered purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans under CECL. Refer to Note 1 for further information. | |
(a) | ExcludesAt March 31, 2020, nonaccrual loans included $970 million of PCD loans. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans excluded PCI loans. Theloans as the Firm is recognizingrecognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools iswas performing. |
| |
(b) | At September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, nonaccrual loans excluded mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.6 billion$616 million and $2.9$2.2 billion, respectively. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. |
| |
(c) | Net charge-offs/(recoveries) andAt March 31, 2020, the net charge-off/(recovery)30+ day delinquency rates forincluded PCD loans. The rate prior to January 1, 2020 was revised to include the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, excluded $43 million and $58 million, respectively, and for nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, excluded $132 million and $151 million, respectively,impact of write-offs in the PCI portfolio. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. Refer to Summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses on page 68 for further information on PCI write-offs. |
| |
(d) | Excludes the impact of PCI loans. For the three months ended September 30,At March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, the net charge-off/(recovery) rates including the impact of PCI loans were as follows: (1) home equity of (0.31)% and (0.12)%, respectively; (2) residential mortgage of (0.04)% and (0.20)%, respectively; (3) Home Lending of (0.08)% and (0.19)%, respectively; and (4) total CCB of 1.10% and 0.89%, respectively. For nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the net charge-off/(recovery) rates included impact of PCI loans were as follows: (1) home equity of (0.16)% and (0.01)%, respectively; (2) residential mortgage of (0.02)% and (0.17)%, respectively; (3) Home Lending of (0.04)% and (0.14)%, respectively; and (4) total CCB of 1.12% and 0.98%, respectively. |
| |
(e) | At September 30, 2019 and 2018, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $2.7$1.0 billion and $4.5$3.2 billion, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. |
| |
(f) | Excludes PCI loans. The 30+ day delinquency rate for PCI loans was 8.56% and 9.39% at September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Business Metrics | | | | | |
Number of branches | 4,967 |
| | 5,028 |
| | (1 | )% |
Active digital customers (in thousands)(a) | 53,799 |
| | 50,651 |
| | 6 |
|
Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b) | 38,236 |
| | 34,371 |
| | 11 |
|
Debit and credit card sales volume | $ | 266.0 |
|
| $ | 255.1 |
|
| 4 |
|
| | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | | | | | |
Average deposits | $ | 718.9 |
| | $ | 668.5 |
| | 8 |
|
Deposit margin | 2.06 | % | | 2.62 | % | | |
Business banking origination volume | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | 1 |
|
Client investment assets | 323.0 |
| | 312.3 |
| | 3 |
|
| | | | | |
Home Lending | | | | | |
Mortgage origination volume by channel | | | | | |
Retail | $ | 14.1 |
| | $ | 7.9 |
| | 78 |
|
Correspondent | 14.0 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 97 |
|
Total mortgage origination volume(c) | $ | 28.1 |
| | $ | 15.0 |
| | 87 |
|
| | | | | |
Total loans serviced (period-end) | $ | 737.8 |
| | $ | 791.5 |
| | (7 | ) |
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) | 505.0 |
| | 529.6 |
| | (5 | ) |
MSR carrying value (period-end) | 3.3 |
| | 6.0 |
| | (45 | ) |
Ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) | 0.65 | % | | 1.13 | % | | |
| | | | | |
MSR revenue multiple(d) | 2.10 | x | | 3.32 | x | | |
| | | | | |
Credit Card | | | | | |
Credit card sales volume, excluding Commercial Card | $ | 179.1 |
| | $ | 172.5 |
| | 4 |
|
Net revenue rate | 10.68 | % | | 10.68 | % | | |
| | | | | |
Auto | | | | | |
Loan and lease origination volume | $ | 8.3 |
| | $ | 7.9 |
| | 5 |
|
Average auto operating lease assets | 23.1 |
| | 20.8 |
| | 11 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
|
Business Metrics | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of branches | 4,949 |
| | 5,066 |
| | (2 | )% | | 4,949 |
| | 5,066 |
| | (2 | )% |
Active digital customers (in thousands)(a) | 51,843 |
| | 48,664 |
| | 7 |
| | 51,843 |
| | 48,664 |
| | 7 |
|
Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b) | 36,510 |
| | 32,538 |
| | 12 |
| | 36,510 |
| | 32,538 |
| | 12 |
|
Debit and credit card sales volume | $ | 282.2 |
|
| $ | 259.0 |
|
| 9 |
| | $ | 818.8 |
|
| $ | 746.4 |
| | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer & Business Banking | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average deposits | $ | 678.3 |
| | $ | 659.5 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 674.5 |
| | $ | 655.3 |
| | 3 |
|
Deposit margin | 2.47 | % | | 2.43 | % | | | | 2.56 | % | | 2.33 | % | | |
Business banking origination volume | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | (5 | ) | | $ | 4.8 |
| | $ | 5.2 |
| | (8 | ) |
Client investment assets | 337.9 |
| | 298.4 |
| | 13 |
| | 337.9 |
| | 298.4 |
| | 13 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Home Lending | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage origination volume by channel | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail | $ | 14.2 |
| | $ | 10.6 |
| | 34 |
| | $ | 34.6 |
| | $ | 29.3 |
| | 18 |
|
Correspondent | 18.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 53 |
| | 37.3 |
| | 32.9 |
| | 13 |
|
Total mortgage origination volume(c) | $ | 32.4 |
| | $ | 22.5 |
| | 44 |
| | $ | 71.9 |
| | $ | 62.2 |
| | 16 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans serviced (period-end) | $ | 774.8 |
| | $ | 798.6 |
| | (3 | ) | | $ | 774.8 |
| | $ | 798.6 |
| | (3 | ) |
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) | 535.8 |
| | 526.5 |
| | 2 |
| | 535.8 |
| | 526.5 |
| | 2 |
|
MSR carrying value (period-end) | 4.4 |
| | 6.4 |
| | (31 | ) | | 4.4 |
| | 6.4 |
| | (31 | ) |
Ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) | 0.82 | % | | 1.22 | % | | | | 0.82 | % | | 1.22 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
MSR revenue multiple(d) | 2.41 | x | | 3.49 | x | | | | 2.34 | x | | 3.49 | x | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Card, excluding Commercial Card | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit card sales volume | $ | 193.6 |
| | $ | 176.0 |
| | 10 |
| | $ | 558.6 |
| | $ | 507.1 |
| | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Card Services | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue rate | 11.40 | % | | 11.50 | % | | | | 11.50 | % | | 11.17 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Merchant Services | | | | | | | | | | | |
Merchant processing volume | $ | 380.5 |
| | $ | 343.8 |
| | 11 |
| | $ | 1,108.6 |
| | $ | 990.9 |
| | 12 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Auto | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan and lease origination volume | $ | 9.1 |
| | $ | 8.1 |
| | 12 |
| | $ | 25.5 |
| | $ | 24.8 |
| | 3 |
|
Average auto operating lease assets | 21.8 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 14 | % | | 21.3 |
| | 18.4 |
| | 16 | % |
| |
(a) | Users of all web and/or mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days. |
| |
(b) | Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days. |
| |
(c) | Firmwide mortgage origination volume was $35.8$31.9 billion and $24.5$16.4 billion for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $78.5 billion and $68.2 billion for nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(d) | Represents the ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) divided by the ratio of annualized loan servicing-related revenue to third-party mortgage loans serviced (average). |
|
| | | | |
CORPORATE & INVESTMENT BANK |
|
|
The Corporate & Investment Bank, which consists of Banking and Markets & Securities Services, offers a broad suite of investment banking, market-making, prime brokerage, and treasury and securities products and services to a global client base of corporations, investors, financial institutions, merchants, government and municipal entities. Banking offers a full range of investment banking products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, as well as loan origination and syndication. Banking also includes Wholesale Payments, which provides payments services enabling clients to manage payments and receipts globally, and cross-border financing. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, a global market-maker in cash securities and derivative instruments, which also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, prime brokerage, and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian which provides custody, fund accounting and administration, and securities lending products principally for asset managers, insurance companies and public and private investment funds. |
Refer to
pages 66–70 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K and Line of Business Metrics on page
173177 for a discussion of the business profile of CIB.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment banking fees | $ | 1,981 |
| | $ | 1,823 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 5,671 |
| | $ | 5,658 |
| | — |
|
Principal transactions | 3,418 |
| | 3,091 |
| | 11 |
| | 11,466 |
| | 10,786 |
| | 6 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees | 360 |
| | 373 |
| | (3 | ) | | 1,095 |
| | 1,136 |
| | (4 | ) |
Asset management, administration and commissions | 1,197 |
| | 1,130 |
| | 6 |
| | 3,447 |
| | 3,416 |
| | 1 |
|
All other income | 226 |
| | 88 |
| | 157 |
| | 649 |
| | 958 |
| | (32 | ) |
Noninterest revenue | 7,182 |
| | 6,505 |
| | 10 |
| | 22,328 |
| | 21,954 |
| | 2 |
|
Net interest income | 2,156 |
| | 2,300 |
| | (6 | ) | | 6,499 |
| | 7,257 |
| | (10 | ) |
Total net revenue(a) | 9,338 |
| | 8,805 |
| | 6 |
| | 28,827 |
| | 29,211 |
| | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 92 |
| | (42 | ) | | NM |
| | 179 |
| | (142 | ) | | NM |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 2,734 |
| | 2,402 |
| | 14 |
| | 8,381 |
| | 8,158 |
| | 3 |
|
Noncompensation expense | 2,614 |
| | 2,773 |
| | (6 | ) | | 7,907 |
| | 8,079 |
| | (2 | ) |
Total noninterest expense | 5,348 |
| | 5,175 |
| | 3 |
| | 16,288 |
| | 16,237 |
| | — |
|
Income before income tax expense | 3,898 |
| | 3,672 |
| | 6 |
| | 12,360 |
| | 13,116 |
| | (6 | ) |
Income tax expense | 1,089 |
| | 1,046 |
| | 4 |
| | 3,365 |
| | 3,318 |
| | 1 |
|
Net income | $ | 2,809 |
| | $ | 2,626 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 8,995 |
| | $ | 9,798 |
| | (8 | )% |
Financial ratios | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on equity | 13 | % | | 14 | % | | | | 14 | % | | 18 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 57 |
| | 59 |
| | | | 57 |
| | 56 |
| | |
Compensation expense as percentage of total net revenue | 29 |
| | 27 |
| | | | 29 |
| | 28 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Revenue | | | | | |
Investment banking fees | $ | 1,907 |
| | $ | 1,844 |
| | 3 | % |
Principal transactions | 3,188 |
| | 4,164 |
| | (23 | ) |
Lending- and deposit-related fees(a) | 450 |
| | 396 |
| | 14 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions(a)
| 1,261 |
| | 1,067 |
| | 18 |
|
All other income | 35 |
| | 365 |
| | (90 | ) |
Noninterest revenue | 6,841 |
| | 7,836 |
| | (13 | ) |
Net interest income | 3,107 |
| | 2,198 |
| | 41 |
|
Total net revenue(b) | 9,948 |
| | 10,034 |
| | (1 | ) |
| | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 1,401 |
| | 87 |
| | NM |
|
| | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 3,006 |
| | 3,091 |
| | (3 | ) |
Noncompensation expense | 2,890 |
| | 2,538 |
| | 14 |
|
Total noninterest expense | 5,896 |
| | 5,629 |
| | 5 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 2,651 |
| | 4,318 |
| | (39 | ) |
Income tax expense | 663 |
| | 1,058 |
| | (37 | ) |
Net income | $ | 1,988 |
| | $ | 3,260 |
| | (39 | )% |
Financial ratios | | | | | |
Return on equity | 9 | % | | 16 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 59 |
| | 56 |
| | |
Compensation expense as percentage of total net revenue | 30 |
| | 31 |
| | |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
| |
(a) | In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and commissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
| |
(b) | Includes tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to income tax credits related to alternative energy investments; income tax credits and amortization of the cost of investments in affordable housing projects; and tax-exempt income from municipal bonds of $527$667 million and $354$539 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $1.6 billion and $1.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
Revenue by business | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Banking | $ | 1,871 |
| | $ | 1,731 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 5,392 |
| | $ | 5,267 |
| | 2 | % |
Treasury Services | 1,101 |
| | 1,183 |
| | (7 | ) | | 3,383 |
| | 3,480 |
| | (3 | ) |
Lending | 329 |
| | 331 |
| | (1 | ) | | 1,006 |
| | 954 |
| | 5 |
|
Total Banking | 3,301 |
| | 3,245 |
| | 2 |
| | 9,781 |
| | 9,701 |
| | 1 |
|
Fixed Income Markets | 3,557 |
| | 2,844 |
| | 25 |
| | 10,972 |
| | 10,850 |
| | 1 |
|
Equity Markets | 1,517 |
| | 1,595 |
| | (5 | ) | | 4,986 |
| | 5,571 |
| | (11 | ) |
Securities Services | 1,034 |
| | 1,057 |
| | (2 | ) | | 3,093 |
| | 3,219 |
| | (4 | ) |
Credit Adjustments & Other(a) | (71 | ) | | 64 |
| | NM |
| | (5 | ) | | (130 | ) | | 96 |
|
Total Markets & Securities Services | 6,037 |
| | 5,560 |
| | 9 |
| | 19,046 |
| | 19,510 |
| | (2 | ) |
Total net revenue | $ | 9,338 |
| | $ | 8,805 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 28,827 |
| | $ | 29,211 |
| | (1 | )% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Revenue by business | | | | | |
Investment Banking | $ | 886 |
| | $ | 1,745 |
| | (49 | )% |
Wholesale Payments
| 1,359 |
| | 1,415 |
| | (4 | ) |
Lending | 350 |
| | 258 |
| | 36 |
|
Total Banking | 2,595 |
| | 3,418 |
| | (24 | ) |
Fixed Income Markets | 4,993 |
| | 3,725 |
| | 34 |
|
Equity Markets | 2,237 |
| | 1,741 |
| | 28 |
|
Securities Services | 1,074 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 6 |
|
Credit Adjustments & Other(a) | (951 | ) | | 136 |
| | NM |
|
Total Markets & Securities Services | 7,353 |
| | 6,616 |
| | 11 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 9,948 |
| | $ | 10,034 |
| | (1 | )% |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
| |
(a) | Consists primarily ofIncludes credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”) managed centrally within CIB and funding valuation adjustments (“FVA”) on derivatives. Resultsderivatives and certain components of fair value option elected liabilities, which are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. Results are presented net of associated hedging activities and net of CVA and FVA amounts allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. |
allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets.
Quarterly results
Net income was $2.8$2.0 billion, up 7%.down 39%, predominantly driven by an increase in the provision for credit losses.
Net revenue was $9.3$9.9 billion, up 6%down 1%.
Banking revenue was $3.3$2.6 billion, up 2%down 24%.
Investment Banking revenue was $1.9 billion, up 8%$886 million, down 49%, predominantly driven by higher debt and equity underwriting fees,$820 million of markdowns on held-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio as high-yield spreads widened significantly. The decline was partially offset by lower advisory fees.higher Investment Banking fees, up 3%. The Firm maintained its #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees, with overall share gains, according to Dealogic.
| |
– | Debt underwriting fees were $961 million,$1.1 billion, up 17%15%, reflectingdriven by both increased industry-wide fees and wallet share gains despite a decline in industry-wide fees, driven by participation in large acquisition financing deals and increased activity in investment-grade bonds.bonds, particularly in March as clients sought to access liquidity. |
| |
– | Equity underwriting fees were $514$331 million, up 22%25%, driven by wallet share gainsincreased industry-wide fees primarily in the IPO market, with strong activity in January and convertible markets.February, compared to a weak prior year. |
| |
– | Advisory fees were $506$503 million, down 13%22%, driven by a decline in industry-wide fees compared to a strong prior year.year, driven by a lower number of completed transactions as well as the impact of delays in regulatory approvals. |
Treasury ServicesWholesale Payments revenue was $1.1$1.4 billion, down 7%4%, driven by a reporting re-classification for certain expenses which are now reported as contra revenue in Merchant Services. In addition, deposit margin
compression partiallywas offset by higher balances and fee growth and higher balances.growth.
Lending revenue was $329$350 million, down 1%.up 36%, predominantly driven by fair value gains on hedges of accrual loans.
Markets & Securities Services revenue was $6.0$7.4 billion, up 9%11%. Markets revenue was $5.1$7.2 billion, up 14%32%.
Fixed Income Markets revenue was $3.6$5.0 billion, up 25% compared to the prior year which reflected less favorable market conditions. The current quarter results were34%, driven by strong client activity across products primarily in Rates agency mortgageand Currencies & Emerging Markets reflecting higher trading within Securitized Products and Commodities.volume particularly in March.
Equity Markets revenue was $1.5$2.2 billion, down 5% compared to a strong prior year. The current quarter results wereup 28%, driven by lower revenuestrong client activity in derivatives reflecting lower client activity and less favorable market conditions which were partially offset by higher revenue in Cash Equities.Equities, particularly in March.
Securities Services revenue was $1.0 billion, down 2%, with deposit margin compression largely offset by organic growth.
The provision for credit losses was $92 million, largely driven by a net addition to the allowance for credit losses related to select emerging market client downgrades. The prior year was a benefit of $42 million reflecting a net recovery related to a loan sale.
Noninterest expense was $5.3$1.1 billion, up 3%, driven by higher volume- and revenue-related expenses and investments, including compensation expense, largely offset
by lower legal expenses and FDIC charges.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $9.0 billion, down 8%.
Net revenue was $28.8 billion, down 1%.
Banking revenue was $9.8 billion, up 1% compared to the prior year.
Investment Banking revenue was $5.4 billion, up 2%, with higher debt underwriting, predominantly offset by lower advisory and equity underwriting fees. The Firm maintained its #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with overall share gains, according to Dealogic.
| |
– | Debt underwriting fees were $2.7 billion, up 7%, reflecting wallet share gains despite a decline in industry-wide fees, driven by participation in large acquisition financing deals. |
| |
– | Advisory fees were $1.7 billion, down 6%, and Equity underwriting fees were $1.3 billion, down 4%, driven by a decline in industry-wide fees despite wallet share gains. |
Treasury Services revenue was $3.4 billion, down 3%, with deposit margin compression predominantly offset by fee growth and higher balances.
Lending revenue was $1.0 billion, up 5%, predominantly driven by higher net interest income reflectingdeposit balance and fee growth in loan balances.
Markets & Securities Services revenue was $19.0 billion, down 2%. Markets revenue was $16.0 billion, down 3% which included a gain from the IPO of Tradeweb. In addition, prior year results included approximately $500 million of fair value gains related to the adoption of the recognition and measurement accounting guidance for certain equity investments previously held at cost.
Fixed Income Markets revenue was $11.0 billion, up 1% reflecting higher revenue in agency mortgage trading within Securitized Products and Commodities partially offset by lower revenue in Currencies & Emerging Markets.
Equity Markets revenue was $5.0 billion, down 11% compared to a strong prior year, predominantly driven by lower client activity in derivatives.
Securities Services revenue was $3.1 billion, down 4%, driven by deposit margin compression and the impact of a business exit partially offset by organic growth.compression.
Credit Adjustments & Other was a loss of $5$951 million, compared with a loss of $130 millionpredominantly driven by funding spread widening on derivatives.
Noninterest expense was $5.9 billion, up 5%, driven by higher legal expense, volume- and revenue-related expenses and investments in the prior year.business, partially offset by lower structural expense.
The provision for credit losses was $179$1.4 billion, compared with $87 million reflecting select C&I client downgrades including those in an emerging market.the prior year. The prior yearincrease was a benefit of $142 million, primarilypredominantly driven by loan salesadditions to the allowance for credit losses from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple sectors and other activity related to a single namecontinued pressure on oil prices, with the largest impact in the Oil & Gas portfolio, partially offset by other net portfolio activity. and Consumer & Retail industries.
Noninterest expense was $16.3 billion, flat comparedRefer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 50–66 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 64–65 for further discussions of the prior year reflecting higher volume-related expensescredit portfolios and investments, including front office hires, as well as technology staff, predominantly offset by lower FDIC charges and revenue-related compensation expense.the allowance for credit losses.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | |
Assets | $ | 1,217,459 |
| | $ | 1,019,470 |
| | 19 | % |
Loans: | | | | | |
Loans retained(a) | 165,376 |
| | 127,086 |
| | 30 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 9,326 |
| | 7,783 |
| | 20 |
|
Total loans | 174,702 |
| | 134,869 |
| | 30 |
|
Equity | 80,000 |
| | 80,000 |
| | — |
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | |
Assets | $ | 1,082,820 |
| | $ | 967,632 |
| | 12 |
|
Trading assets-debt and equity instruments | 427,316 |
| | 381,312 |
| | 12 |
|
Trading assets-derivative receivables | 55,133 |
| | 50,609 |
| | 9 |
|
Loans: | | | | | |
Loans retained(a) | $ | 128,838 |
| | $ | 126,990 |
| | 1 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 9,818 |
| | 8,615 |
| | 14 |
|
Total loans | $ | 138,656 |
| | $ | 135,605 |
| | 2 |
|
Equity | 80,000 |
| | 80,000 |
| | — |
|
Headcount | 60,245 |
| | 58,811 |
| | 2 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | $ | 1,023,132 |
| | $ | 928,148 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 1,023,132 |
| | $ | 928,148 |
| | 10 | % |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans retained(a) | 118,290 |
| | 117,084 |
| | 1 |
| | 118,290 |
| | 117,084 |
| | 1 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 8,324 |
| | 6,133 |
| | 36 |
| | 8,324 |
| | 6,133 |
| | 36 |
|
Total loans | 126,614 |
| | 123,217 |
| | 3 |
| | 126,614 |
| | 123,217 |
| | 3 |
|
Core loans | 126,445 |
| | 122,953 |
| | 3 |
| | 126,445 |
| | 122,953 |
| | 3 |
|
Equity | 80,000 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 14 |
| | 80,000 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 14 |
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | $ | 1,003,395 |
| | $ | 924,909 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | 985,503 |
| | $ | 924,145 |
| | 7 |
|
Trading assets-debt and equity instruments | 415,450 |
| | 349,390 |
| | 19 |
| | 406,304 |
| | 354,270 |
| | 15 |
|
Trading assets-derivative receivables | 48,266 |
| | 62,025 |
| | (22 | ) | | 49,221 |
| | 60,943 |
| | (19 | ) |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans retained(a) | $ | 119,007 |
| | $ | 115,390 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 123,368 |
| | $ | 112,921 |
| | 9 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 8,344 |
| | 7,328 |
| | 14 |
| | 8,239 |
| | 6,263 |
| | 32 |
|
Total loans | $ | 127,351 |
| | $ | 122,718 |
| | 4 |
| | $ | 131,607 |
| | $ | 119,184 |
| | 10 |
|
Core loans | 127,187 |
| | 122,442 |
| | 4 |
| | 131,436 |
| | 118,877 |
| | 11 |
|
Equity | 80,000 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 14 |
| | 80,000 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 14 |
|
Headcount | 55,873 |
| | 54,052 |
| | 3 | % | | 55,873 |
| | 54,052 |
| | 3 | % |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation, including an increase to period-end assets and headcount of $13.4 billion and 4,114, respectively, as of March 31, 2019. | |
(a) | Loans retained includes credit portfolio loans, loans held by consolidated Firm-administered multi-seller conduits, trade finance loans, other held-for-investment loans and overdrafts. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | 83 | % |
Nonperforming assets: | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans: | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans retained(a) | $ | 689 |
| | $ | 812 |
| | (15 | )% |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 138 |
| | 313 |
| | (56 | ) |
Total nonaccrual loans | 827 |
| | 1,125 |
| | (26 | ) |
Derivative receivables | 85 |
| | 44 |
| | 94 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | 43 |
| | 58 |
| | (26 | ) |
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 955 |
| | $ | 1,227 |
| | (22 | ) |
Allowance for credit losses: | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 1,422 |
| | $ | 1,252 |
| | 14 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 1,468 |
| | 758 |
| | 94 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 2,890 |
| | $ | 2,010 |
| | 44 | % |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(b) | 0.17 | % | | 0.10 | % | | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained | 0.86 |
| | 0.99 |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained, excluding trade finance and conduits(c) | 1.11 |
| | 1.34 |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a) | 206 |
| | 154 |
| | |
Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans | 0.47 | % | | 0.83 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 38 |
| | $ | (40 | ) | | NM |
| | $ | 140 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | 49 | % |
Nonperforming assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans retained(a) | $ | 712 |
| | $ | 318 |
| | 124 | % | | $ | 712 |
| | $ | 318 |
| | 124 |
|
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 262 |
| | 9 |
| | NM |
| | 262 |
| | 9 |
| | NM |
|
Total nonaccrual loans | 974 |
| | 327 |
| | 198 |
| | 974 |
| | 327 |
| | 198 |
|
Derivative receivables | 26 |
| | 90 |
| | (71 | ) | | 26 |
| | 90 |
| | (71 | ) |
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | 75 |
| | 61 |
| | 23 |
| | 75 |
| | 61 |
| | 23 |
|
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 1,075 |
| | $ | 478 |
| | 125 |
| | $ | 1,075 |
| | $ | 478 |
| | 125 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 1,171 |
| | $ | 1,068 |
| | 10 |
| | $ | 1,171 |
| | $ | 1,068 |
| | 10 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 824 |
| | 802 |
| | 3 |
| | 824 |
| | 802 |
| | 3 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 1,995 |
| | $ | 1,870 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 1,995 |
| | $ | 1,870 |
| | 7 | % |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(b) | 0.13 | % | | (0.14 | )% | | | | 0.15 | % | | 0.11 | % | | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained | 0.99 |
| | 0.91 |
| | | | 0.99 |
| | 0.91 |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained, excluding trade finance and conduits(c) | 1.33 |
| | 1.27 |
| | | | 1.33 |
| | 1.27 |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a) | 164 |
| | 336 |
| | | | 164 |
| | 336 |
| | |
Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans | 0.77 | % | | 0.27 | % | | | | 0.77 | % | | 0.27 | % | | |
| |
(a) | Allowance for loan losses of $207$317 million and $145$252 million were held against these nonaccrual loans at September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate. |
| |
(c) | Management uses allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained, excluding trade finance and conduits, a non-GAAP financial measure, to provide a more meaningful assessment of CIB’s allowance coverage ratio. |
| | Investment banking fees | Investment banking fees | | | | | | | | | | | Investment banking fees | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Advisory | $ | 506 |
| | $ | 581 |
| | (13 | )% | | $ | 1,675 |
| | $ | 1,782 |
| | (6 | )% | $ | 503 |
| | $ | 644 |
| | (22 | )% |
Equity underwriting | 514 |
| | 420 |
| | 22 |
| | 1,284 |
| | 1,336 |
| | (4 | ) | 331 |
| | 265 |
| | 25 |
|
Debt underwriting(a) | 961 |
| | 822 |
| | 17 |
| | 2,712 |
| | 2,540 |
| | 7 |
| 1,073 |
| | 935 |
| | 15 |
|
Total investment banking fees | $ | 1,981 |
| | $ | 1,823 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 5,671 |
| | $ | 5,658 |
| | — |
| $ | 1,907 |
| | $ | 1,844 |
| | 3 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents long-term debt and loan syndications. |
| | League table results – wallet share | League table results – wallet share | | | | | | | | | | | League table results – wallet share | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Full-year 2018
| Three months ended March 31, | | Full-year 2019 |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | |
| Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share | Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share | | Rank | | Share |
Based on fees(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | Based on fees(a) | | | | | | |
M&A(b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global | # | 2 |
| | 8.6 | | # | 2 |
| | 8.4 | | # | 2 |
| | 9.3 | | # | 2 |
| | 8.8 | | # | 2 |
| | 8.7 | % | # | 2 |
| | 8.6 | | # | 2 |
| | 9.8 | | # | 2 |
| | 9.0 | % |
U.S. | 4 |
| | 8.7 | | 3 |
| | 7.0 | | 2 |
| | 9.4 | | 2 |
| | 9.3 | | 2 |
| | 8.9 |
| 2 |
| | 9.0 | | 2 |
| | 10.1 | | 2 |
| | 9.3 |
|
Equity and equity-related(c) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global | 1 |
| | 11.9 | | 1 |
| | 9.7 | | 1 |
| | 10.3 | | 3 |
| | 9.1 | | 1 |
| | 9.0 |
| 2 |
| | 8.8 | | 3 |
| | 8.7 | | 1 |
| | 9.3 |
|
U.S. | 1 |
| | 17.3 | | 1 |
| | 13.2 | | 1 |
| | 13.8 | | 1 |
| | 12.5 | | 1 |
| | 12.3 |
| 2 |
| | 12.5 | | 1 |
| | 12.4 | | 1 |
| | 13.3 |
|
Long-term debt(d) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global | 1 |
| | 8.8 | | 1 |
| | 7.8 | | 1 |
| | 8.0 | | 1 |
| | 7.4 | | 1 |
| | 7.2 |
| 1 |
| | 9.5 | | 1 |
| | 7.8 | | 1 |
| | 7.8 |
|
U.S. | 1 |
| | 13.7 | | 1 |
| | 12.9 | | 1 |
| | 12.2 | | 1 |
| | 11.4 | | 1 |
| | 11.2 |
| 1 |
| | 12.8 | | 1 |
| | 11.8 | | 1 |
| | 12.0 |
|
Loan syndications | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global | 1 |
| | 10.1 | | 1 |
| | 10.8 | | 1 |
| | 10.6 | | 1 |
| | 9.9 | | 1 |
| | 9.7 |
| 1 |
| | 9.8 | | 1 |
| | 13.0 | | 1 |
| | 10.2 |
|
U.S. | 1 |
| | 13.0 | | 1 |
| | 14.4 | | 1 |
| | 13.2 | | 1 |
| | 12.6 | | 1 |
| | 12.3 |
| 2 |
| | 9.1 | | 1 |
| | 16.4 | | 1 |
| | 12.5 |
|
Global investment banking fees(e) | # | 1 |
| | 9.6 | | # | 1 |
| | 9.0 | | # | 1 |
| | 9.3 | | # | 1 |
| | 8.7 | | # | 1 |
| | 8.6 | % | # | 1 |
| | 9.1 | | # | 1 |
| | 9.6 | | # | 1 |
| | 8.9 | % |
| |
(a) | Source: Dealogic as of OctoberApril 1, 2019.2020. Reflects the ranking of revenue wallet and market share. |
| |
(b) | Global M&A excludes any withdrawn transactions. U.S. M&A revenue wallet represents wallet from client parents based in the U.S. |
| |
(c) | Global equity and equity-related ranking includes rights offerings and Chinese A-Shares. |
| |
(d) | Long-term debt rankings include investment-grade, high-yield, supranationals, sovereigns, agencies, covered bonds, asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”); and exclude money market, short-term debt, and U.S. municipal securities. |
| |
(e) | Global investment banking fees exclude money market, short-term debt and shelf deals. |
Markets revenue
The following table summarizes select income statement data for the Markets businesses. Markets includes both Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Markets revenue comprises principal transactions, fees, commissions and other income, as well as net interest income. The Firm assesses its Markets business performance on a total revenue basis, as offsets may occur across revenue line items. For example, securities that generate net interest income may be risk-managed by derivatives that are
recorded in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 56 and 67 for a description of the composition of these income statement line items. Refer to Markets revenue on page 69 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information.
For the periods presented below, the predominant source of principal transactions revenue was the amount recognized
upon executing new transactions.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Three months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
(in millions) | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets | | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets | | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets |
Principal transactions | $ | 2,292 |
| $ | 1,263 |
| $ | 3,555 |
| | $ | 1,849 |
| $ | 1,252 |
| $ | 3,101 |
| $ | 3,143 |
| $ | 1,723 |
| $ | 4,866 |
| | $ | 2,482 |
| $ | 1,557 |
| $ | 4,039 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees | 51 |
| 1 |
| 52 |
| | 51 |
| 1 |
| 52 |
| 47 |
| 2 |
| 49 |
| | 49 |
| 2 |
| 51 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions | 110 |
| 472 |
| 582 |
| | 96 |
| 446 |
| 542 |
| 111 |
| 608 |
| 719 |
| | 103 |
| 434 |
| 537 |
|
All other income | 108 |
| 54 |
| 162 |
| | 33 |
| 7 |
| 40 |
| 1 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| | 219 |
| (4 | ) | 215 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 2,561 |
| 1,790 |
| 4,351 |
| | 2,029 |
| 1,706 |
| 3,735 |
| 3,302 |
| 2,332 |
| 5,634 |
| | 2,853 |
| 1,989 |
| 4,842 |
|
Net interest income | 996 |
| (273 | ) | 723 |
| | 815 |
| (111 | ) | 704 |
| 1,691 |
| (95 | ) | 1,596 |
| | 872 |
| (248 | ) | 624 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 3,557 |
| $ | 1,517 |
| $ | 5,074 |
| | $ | 2,844 |
| $ | 1,595 |
| $ | 4,439 |
| $ | 4,993 |
| $ | 2,237 |
| $ | 7,230 |
| | $ | 3,725 |
| $ | 1,741 |
| $ | 5,466 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
(in millions) | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets | | Fixed Income Markets | Equity Markets | Total Markets |
Principal transactions | $ | 7,205 |
| $ | 4,428 |
| $ | 11,633 |
| | $ | 6,795 |
| $ | 4,528 |
| $ | 11,323 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees | 149 |
| 5 |
| 154 |
| | 147 |
| 4 |
| 151 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions | 310 |
| 1,359 |
| 1,669 |
| | 313 |
| 1,364 |
| 1,677 |
|
All other income | 500 |
| 31 |
| 531 |
| | 764 |
| 18 |
| 782 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 8,164 |
| 5,823 |
| 13,987 |
| | 8,019 |
| 5,914 |
| 13,933 |
|
Net interest income(a) | 2,808 |
| (837 | ) | 1,971 |
| | 2,831 |
| (343 | ) | 2,488 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 10,972 |
| $ | 4,986 |
| $ | 15,958 |
| | $ | 10,850 |
| $ | 5,571 |
| $ | 16,421 |
|
| |
(a) | Declines in Markets net interest income were driven by higher funding costs. |
In the first quarter of 2020, CIB Markets had two loss days. Loss days represent the number of days for which CIB Markets, which consists of Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets, posted losses to total net revenue. The loss days determined under this measure differ from the measure used to determine backtesting gains and losses. Daily backtesting gains and losses include positions in the Firm’s Risk Management value-at-risk (“VaR”) measure and exclude select components of total net revenue, which may more than offset backtesting gains or losses on a particular day. For more information on daily backtesting gains and losses, refer to the VaR discussion on pages 67–69.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
Assets under custody (“AUC”) by asset class (period-end) (in billions): | | | | | |
Fixed Income | $ | 13,572 |
| | $ | 12,772 |
| | 6 | % |
Equity | 7,819 |
| | 9,028 |
| | (13 | ) |
Other(a) | 3,018 |
| | 2,916 |
| | 3 |
|
Total AUC | $ | 24,409 |
|
| $ | 24,716 |
| | (1 | ) |
Merchant processing volume (in billions)(b) | $ | 374.8 |
| | $ | 356.5 |
| | 5 |
|
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(c) | $ | 514,464 |
|
| $ | 444,055 |
| | 16 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
Assets under custody (“AUC”) by asset class (period-end) (in billions): | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Income | $ | 13,349 |
| | $ | 12,339 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 13,349 |
| | $ | 12,339 |
| | 8 | % |
Equity | 9,301 |
| | 9,174 |
| | 1 |
| | 9,301 |
| | 9,174 |
| | 1 |
|
Other(a) | 3,045 |
| | 2,890 |
| | 5 |
| | 3,045 |
| | 2,890 |
| | 5 |
|
Total AUC | $ | 25,695 |
|
| $ | 24,403 |
| | 5 |
| | $ | 25,695 |
| | $ | 24,403 |
| | 5 |
|
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b) | $ | 471,291 |
|
| $ | 434,847 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 457,961 |
| | $ | 430,640 |
| | 6 | % |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. | |
(a) | Consists of mutual funds, unit investment trusts, currencies, annuities, insurance contracts, options and other contracts. |
| |
(b) | Represents total merchant processing volume across CIB, CCB and CB. |
| |
(c) | Client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertain to the Treasury ServicesWholesale Payments and Securities Services businesses. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
International metrics | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) | 2020 | | 2019(c) | | Change |
Total net revenue(a) | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 2,590 |
| | $ | 3,180 |
| | (19 | )% |
Asia-Pacific | 1,776 |
| | 1,407 |
| | 26 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 507 |
| | 406 |
| | 25 |
|
Total international net revenue | 4,873 |
| | 4,993 |
| | (2 | ) |
North America | 5,075 |
| | 5,041 |
| | 1 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 9,948 |
| | $ | 10,034 |
| | (1 | ) |
| | | | | |
Loans retained (period-end)(a) | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 29,184 |
| | $ | 26,329 |
| | 11 |
|
Asia-Pacific | 16,822 |
| | 18,006 |
| | (7 | ) |
Latin America/Caribbean | 8,197 |
| | 7,397 |
| | 11 |
|
Total international loans | 54,203 |
| | 51,732 |
| | 5 |
|
North America | 111,173 |
| | 75,354 |
| | 48 |
|
Total loans retained | $ | 165,376 |
| | $ | 127,086 |
| | 30 |
|
| | | | | |
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b) | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 190,976 |
| | $ | 164,138 |
| | 16 |
|
Asia-Pacific | 103,792 |
| | 85,082 |
| | 22 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 30,849 |
| | 27,482 |
| | 12 |
|
Total international | $ | 325,617 |
| | $ | 276,702 |
| | 18 |
|
North America | 188,847 |
| | 167,353 |
| | 13 |
|
Total client deposits and other third-party liabilities | $ | 514,464 |
| | $ | 444,055 |
| | 16 |
|
| | | | | |
AUC (period-end)(b) (in billions) | | | | | |
North America | $ | 15,590 |
| | $ | 15,352 |
| | 2 |
|
All other regions | 8,819 |
| | 9,364 |
| | (6 | ) |
Total AUC | $ | 24,409 |
| | $ | 24,716 |
| | (1 | )% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
International metrics | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) | 2019 | | 2018(c) | | Change | | 2019 | | 2018(c) | | Change |
Total net revenue(a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 2,892 |
| | $ | 2,773 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 8,955 |
| | $ | 9,936 |
| | (10 | )% |
Asia/Pacific | 1,428 |
| | 1,234 |
| | 16 |
| | 4,143 |
| | 3,997 |
| | 4 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 404 |
| | 318 |
| | 27 |
| | 1,205 |
| | 1,123 |
| | 7 |
|
Total international net revenue | 4,724 |
| | 4,325 |
| | 9 |
| | 14,303 |
| | 15,056 |
| | (5 | ) |
North America | 4,614 |
| | 4,480 |
| | 3 |
| | 14,524 |
| | 14,155 |
| | 3 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 9,338 |
| | $ | 8,805 |
| | 6 |
| | $ | 28,827 |
| | $ | 29,211 |
| | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans retained (period-end)(a) | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 23,807 |
| | $ | 25,341 |
| | (6 | ) | | $ | 23,807 |
| | $ | 25,341 |
| | (6 | ) |
Asia/Pacific | 14,402 |
| | 16,907 |
| | (15 | ) | | 14,402 |
| | 16,907 |
| | (15 | ) |
Latin America/Caribbean | 5,782 |
| | 6,097 |
| | (5 | ) | | 5,782 |
| | 6,097 |
| | (5 | ) |
Total international loans | 43,991 |
| | 48,345 |
| | (9 | ) | | 43,991 |
| | 48,345 |
| | (9 | ) |
North America | 74,299 |
| | 68,739 |
| | 8 |
| | 74,299 |
| | 68,739 |
| | 8 |
|
Total loans retained | $ | 118,290 |
| | $ | 117,084 |
| | 1 |
| | $ | 118,290 |
| | $ | 117,084 |
| | 1 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 175,354 |
| | $ | 162,060 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | 171,601 |
| | $ | 162,102 |
| | 6 |
|
Asia/Pacific | 91,556 |
| | 81,771 |
| | 12 |
| | 87,866 |
| | 82,272 |
| | 7 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 30,165 |
| | 26,196 |
| | 15 |
| | 28,849 |
| | 26,477 |
| | 9 |
|
Total international | $ | 297,075 |
| | $ | 270,027 |
| | 10 |
| | $ | 288,316 |
| | $ | 270,851 |
| | 6 |
|
North America | 174,216 |
| | 164,820 |
| | 6 |
| | 169,645 |
| | 159,789 |
| | 6 |
|
Total client deposits and other third-party liabilities | $ | 471,291 |
| | $ | 434,847 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | 457,961 |
| | $ | 430,640 |
| | 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
AUC (period-end)(b) (in billions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 16,146 |
| | $ | 15,148 |
| | 7 |
| | $ | 16,146 |
| | $ | 15,148 |
| | 7 |
|
All other regions | 9,549 |
| | 9,255 |
| | 3 |
| | 9,549 |
| | 9,255 |
| | 3 |
|
Total AUC | $ | 25,695 |
| | $ | 24,403 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 25,695 |
| | $ | 24,403 |
| | 5 | % |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. | |
(a) | Total net revenue and loans retained (excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value) are based on the location of the trading desk, booking location, or domicile of the client, as applicable. |
| |
(b) | Client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertaining to the Treasury ServicesWholesale Payments and Securities Services businesses, and AUC, are based on the domicile of the client. |
| |
(c) | The prior periodprior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
|
|
Commercial Banking provides comprehensive financial solutions, including lending, wholesale payments, investment banking and asset management products across three primary client segments: Middle Market Banking, Corporate Client Banking and Commercial Real Estate Banking. Other includes amounts not aligned with a primary client segment.
Middle Market Banking covers small business and midsized corporations, local governments and nonprofit clients.
Corporate Client Banking covers large corporations.
Commercial Real Estate Banking covers investors, developers, and owners of multifamily, office, retail, industrial and affordable housing properties. |
Refer to pages 71-73 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K and Line of Business Metrics on page 174178 for a discussion of the business profile of CB.
| | Selected income statement data | Selected income statement data | | | | | | | Selected income statement data |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lending- and deposit-related fees(a) | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 216 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 664 |
| | $ | 666 |
| | — | % | $ | 261 |
| | $ | 233 |
| | 12 | % |
All other income(a) | 378 |
| | 360 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,142 |
| | 1,092 |
| | 5 |
| 360 |
| | 500 |
| | (28 | ) |
Noninterest revenue | 599 |
| | 576 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,806 |
| | 1,758 |
| | 3 |
| 621 |
| | 733 |
| | (15 | ) |
Net interest income | 1,608 |
| | 1,695 |
| | (5 | ) | | 4,950 |
| | 4,995 |
| | (1 | ) | 1,557 |
| | 1,680 |
| | (7 | ) |
Total net revenue(b) | 2,207 |
| | 2,271 |
| | (3 | ) | | 6,756 |
| | 6,753 |
| | — |
| 2,178 |
| | 2,413 |
| | (10 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 67 |
| | (15 | ) | | NM |
| | 186 |
| | 23 |
| | NM |
| 1,010 |
| | 90 |
| | NM |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 454 |
| | 432 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,341 |
| | 1,268 |
| | 6 |
| 472 |
| | 449 |
| | 5 |
|
Noncompensation expense | 427 |
| | 421 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,277 |
| | 1,273 |
| | — |
| 513 |
| | 489 |
| | 5 |
|
Amortization of intangibles | | 3 |
| | — |
| | NM |
|
Total noninterest expense | 881 |
| | 853 |
| | 3 |
| | 2,618 |
| | 2,541 |
| | 3 |
| 988 |
| | 938 |
| | 5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax expense | 1,259 |
| | 1,433 |
| | (12 | ) | | 3,952 |
| | 4,189 |
| | (6 | ) | 180 |
| | 1,385 |
| | (87 | ) |
Income tax expense | 322 |
| | 344 |
| | (6 | ) | | 966 |
| | 988 |
| | (2 | ) | 33 |
| | 325 |
| | (90 | ) |
Net income | $ | 937 |
| | $ | 1,089 |
| | (14 | )% | | $ | 2,986 |
| | $ | 3,201 |
| | (7 | )% | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 1,060 |
| | (86 | )% |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB and the revenue and expense of the business is reported across CCB, CIB and CB based primarily on client relationship. In conjunction with this realignment, treasury services product revenue has been renamed wholesale payments. Prior period revenue and expense amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
| |
(a) | Effective inIn the first quarter of 2019, includes revenue2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from investment banking products, commercial card transactions and asset management, administration and commissions (which are included in all other income) to lending- and deposit-related fees. The prior periodPrior-period amounts have beenwere revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
| |
(b) | Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments from income tax credits related to equity investments in designated community |
development entities that provide loans to qualified businessesand in low-income communities,entities established for rehabilitation of historic properties, as well as tax-exempt income related to municipal financing activities of $114$81 million and $107$94 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively and $308 million and $316 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Quarterly results
Net income was $937$147 million, a decrease of 14%.86%, predominantly driven by an increase in the provision for credit losses.
Net revenue was $2.2 billion, down 3%10%. Net interest income was $1.6 billion, down 5%7%, driven by lower deposit margins, partially offset by higher deposit balances. Noninterest revenue was $599$621 million, an increasea decrease of 4%15%, predominantly driven by strongmarkdowns on held-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments in the bridge financing portfolio, and lower investment banking performance due to increased equity underwriting and M&A activity.revenue, partially offset by higher deposit-related fees.
Noninterest expense was $881$988 million, up 3%5%, predominantly driven by investments in the business, largely offset by lower FDIC charges.
The provision for credit losses was $67 million, compared with a benefit of $15 million in the prior year.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $3.0 billion, a decrease of 7%.
Net revenue of $6.8 billion was flat. Net interest income was $5.0 billion, a decrease of 1%, driven by lower loan spreads and lower deposit balances, largely offset by higher deposit margins. Noninterest revenue was $1.8 billion, up 3% driven by higher investment banking revenue, predominantly due to increased equity underwriting and M&A activity.
Noninterest expense was $2.6 billion, an increase of 3%, predominantly driven by continued investments in the business, largely offset by lower FDIC charges.business.
The provision for credit losses was $186$1.0 billion, compared with $90 million largelyin the prior year. The increase was predominantly driven by a net additionadditions to the allowance for credit losses relatedfrom the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple sectors and continued pressure on oil prices, with the largest impacts in the Oil & Gas, Real Estate, and Consumer & Retail industries.
Refer to select C&I client downgrades.
Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 50–66 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 64–65 for further discussions of the credit portfolios and the allowance for credit losses.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data (continued) | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
Revenue by product | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lending | $ | 1,006 |
| | $ | 1,027 |
| | (2 | )% | | $ | 3,030 |
| | $ | 3,052 |
| | (1 | )% |
Treasury services | 950 |
| | 1,021 |
| | (7 | ) | | 2,968 |
| | 3,019 |
| | (2 | ) |
Investment banking(a) | 226 |
| | 206 |
| | 10 |
| | 708 |
| | 644 |
| | 10 |
|
Other | 25 |
| | 17 |
| | 47 |
| | 50 |
| | 38 |
| | 32 |
|
Total Commercial Banking net revenue | $ | 2,207 |
| | $ | 2,271 |
| | (3 | ) | | $ | 6,756 |
| | $ | 6,753 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment banking revenue, gross(b) | $ | 700 |
| | $ | 581 |
| | 20 |
| | $ | 2,110 |
| | $ | 1,889 |
| | 12 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue by client segments | | | | | | | | | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 903 |
| | $ | 935 |
| | (3 | ) | | $ | 2,793 |
| | $ | 2,749 |
| | 2 |
|
Corporate Client Banking | 739 |
| | 749 |
| | (1 | ) | | 2,264 |
| | 2,243 |
| | 1 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Banking(c) | 547 |
| | 562 |
| | (3 | ) | | 1,632 |
| | 1,681 |
| | (3 | ) |
Other(c) | 18 |
| | 25 |
| | (28 | ) | | 67 |
| | 80 |
| | (16 | ) |
Total Commercial Banking net revenue | $ | 2,207 |
| | $ | 2,271 |
| | (3 | )% | | $ | 6,756 |
| | $ | 6,753 |
| | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial ratios | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on equity | 16 | % | | 21 | % | | | | 17 | % | | 20 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 40 |
| | 38 |
| | | | 39 |
| | 38 |
| | |
|
| | | | |
CB product revenue consists of the following: |
Lending includes a variety of financing alternatives, which are primarily provided on a secured basis; collateral includes receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate or other assets. Products include term loans, revolving lines of credit, bridge financing, asset-based structures, leases, and standby letters of credit. |
Wholesale payments includes revenue from a broad range of products and services that enable CB clients to manage payments and receipts, as well as invest and manage funds. |
Investment banking includes revenue from a range of products providing CB clients with sophisticated capital-raising alternatives, as well as balance sheet and risk management tools through advisory, equity underwriting, and loan syndications. Revenue from Fixed Income and Equity Markets products used by CB clients is also included. |
Other product revenue primarily includes tax-equivalent adjustments generated from Community Development Banking activities and certain income derived from principal transactions. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data (continued) |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Revenue by product | | | | | |
Lending | $ | 954 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
| | (6 | )% |
Wholesale payments | 991 |
| | 1,104 |
| | (10 | ) |
Investment banking(a) | 235 |
| | 289 |
| | (19 | ) |
Other | (2 | ) | | 8 |
| | NM |
|
Total Commercial Banking net revenue | $ | 2,178 |
| | $ | 2,413 |
| | (10 | ) |
| | | | | |
Investment banking revenue, gross(b) | $ | 686 |
| | $ | 818 |
| | (16 | ) |
| | | | | |
Revenue by client segments | | | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 946 |
| | $ | 974 |
| | (3 | ) |
Corporate Client Banking | 681 |
| | 851 |
| | (20 | ) |
Commercial Real Estate Banking | 541 |
| | 547 |
| | (1 | ) |
Other | 10 |
| | 41 |
| | (76 | ) |
Total Commercial Banking net revenue | $ | 2,178 |
| | $ | 2,413 |
| | (10 | )% |
| | | | | |
Financial ratios | | | | | |
Return on equity | 2 | % | | 19 | % | | |
Overhead ratio | 45 |
| | 39 |
| | |
In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB and the revenue and expense of the business is reported across CCB, CIB and CB based primarily on client relationship. In conjunction with this realignment, treasury services product revenue has been renamed wholesale payments. Prior period revenue and expense amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
| |
(a) | Includes CB’s share of revenue from investment banking products sold to CB clients through the CIB. |
| |
(b) | Refer to Business Segment Results on page 60 of the 2018 Form 10-K21 for discussion of revenue sharing. |
| |
(c) | Effective in the first quarter of 2019, client segment data includes Commercial Real Estate Banking which comprises the former Commercial Term Lending and Real Estate Banking client segments, and Community Development Banking (previously part of Other). The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | |
Total assets | $ | 247,786 |
| $ | 216,111 |
| 15 | % |
Loans: | | | |
Loans retained | 232,254 |
| 204,927 |
| 13 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 1,112 |
| 410 |
| 171 |
|
Total loans | $ | 233,366 |
| $ | 205,337 |
| 14 |
|
Equity | 22,000 |
| 22,000 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Period-end loans by client segment | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 60,317 |
| $ | 56,846 |
| 6 |
|
Corporate Client Banking | 69,540 |
| 46,897 |
| 48 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Banking | 102,799 |
| 100,622 |
| 2 |
|
Other | 710 |
| 972 |
| (27 | ) |
Total Commercial Banking loans | $ | 233,366 |
| $ | 205,337 |
| 14 |
|
| | | |
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | |
Total assets | $ | 226,071 |
| $ | 218,297 |
| 4 |
|
Loans: | | | |
Loans retained | 209,988 |
| 204,462 |
| 3 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 1,831 |
| 1,634 |
| 12 |
|
Total loans | $ | 211,819 |
| $ | 206,096 |
| 3 |
|
| | | |
Average loans by client segment | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 56,045 |
| $ | 56,723 |
| (1 | ) |
Corporate Client Banking | 53,032 |
| 48,141 |
| 10 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Banking | 101,526 |
| 100,264 |
| 1 |
|
Other | 1,216 |
| 968 |
| 26 |
|
Total Commercial Banking loans | $ | 211,819 |
| $ | 206,096 |
| 3 |
|
| | | |
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities | $ | 188,808 |
| $ | 167,260 |
| 13 |
|
Equity | 22,000 |
| 22,000 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Headcount | 11,779 |
| 11,033 |
| 7 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 | 2018 | Change |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 222,483 |
| $ | 217,194 |
| 2 | % | | $ | 222,483 |
| $ | 217,194 |
| 2 | % |
Loans: | | | | | | | |
Loans retained | 209,448 |
| 205,177 |
| 2 |
| | 209,448 |
| 205,177 |
| 2 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 3,187 |
| 405 |
| NM |
| | 3,187 |
| 405 |
| NM |
|
Total loans | $ | 212,635 |
| $ | 205,582 |
| 3 |
| | $ | 212,635 |
| $ | 205,582 |
| 3 |
|
Core loans | 212,514 |
| 205,418 |
| 3 |
| | 212,514 |
| 205,418 |
| 3 |
|
Equity | 22,000 |
| 20,000 |
| 10 |
| | 22,000 |
| 20,000 |
| 10 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Period-end loans by client segment | | | | | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 54,298 |
| $ | 57,324 |
| (5 | ) | | $ | 54,298 |
| $ | 57,324 |
| (5 | ) |
Corporate Client Banking | 55,976 |
| 46,890 |
| 19 |
| | 55,976 |
| 46,890 |
| 19 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Banking(a) | 101,326 |
| 100,072 |
| 1 |
| | 101,326 |
| 100,072 |
| 1 |
|
Other(a) | 1,035 |
| 1,296 |
| (20 | ) | | 1,035 |
| 1,296 |
| (20 | ) |
Total Commercial Banking loans | $ | 212,635 |
| $ | 205,582 |
| 3 |
| | $ | 212,635 |
| $ | 205,582 |
| 3 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 218,620 |
| $ | 219,232 |
| — |
| | $ | 218,560 |
| $ | 218,270 |
| — |
|
Loans: | | | | | | | |
Loans retained | 207,286 |
| 205,603 |
| 1 |
| | 206,183 |
| 203,950 |
| 1 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 963 |
| 1,617 |
| (40 | ) | | 1,097 |
| 1,139 |
| (4 | ) |
Total loans | $ | 208,249 |
| $ | 207,220 |
| — |
| | $ | 207,280 |
| $ | 205,089 |
| 1 |
|
Core loans | 208,125 |
| 207,052 |
| 1 |
| | 207,145 |
| 204,902 |
| 1 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Average loans by client segment | | | | | | | |
Middle Market Banking | $ | 54,806 |
| $ | 57,258 |
| (4 | ) | | $ | 56,221 |
| $ | 57,121 |
| (2 | ) |
Corporate Client Banking | 51,389 |
| 49,004 |
| 5 |
| | 49,407 |
| 47,650 |
| 4 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Banking(a) | 101,044 |
| 99,627 |
| 1 |
| | 100,663 |
| 98,880 |
| 2 |
|
Other(a) | 1,010 |
| 1,331 |
| (24 | ) | | 989 |
| 1,438 |
| (31 | ) |
Total Commercial Banking loans | $ | 208,249 |
| $ | 207,220 |
| — |
| | $ | 207,280 |
| $ | 205,089 |
| 1 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities | $ | 172,714 |
| $ | 168,169 |
| 3 |
| | $ | 169,427 |
| $ | 171,483 |
| (1 | ) |
Equity | 22,000 |
| 20,000 |
| 10 |
| | 22,000 |
| 20,000 |
| 10 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Headcount | 11,501 |
| 10,937 |
| 5 | % | | 11,501 |
| 10,937 |
| 5 | % |
| |
(a) | Effective in the first quarter of 2019, client segment data includes Commercial Real Estate Banking which comprises the former Commercial Term Lending and Real Estate Banking client segments, and Community Development Banking (previously part of Other). The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics (continued) | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Credit data and quality statistics | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 100 |
| $ | 11 |
| NM |
|
Nonperforming assets | | | |
Nonaccrual loans: | | | |
Nonaccrual loans retained(a) | $ | 793 |
| $ | 544 |
| 46 | % |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | — |
| — |
| — |
|
Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 793 |
| $ | 544 |
| 46 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | 24 |
| — |
| NM |
|
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 817 |
| $ | 544 |
| 50 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 2,680 |
| $ | 2,766 |
| (3 | ) |
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 505 |
| 250 |
| 102 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 3,185 |
| $ | 3,016 |
| 6 | % |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(b) | 0.19 | % | 0.02 | % | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained | 1.15 |
| 1.35 |
| |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a) | 338 |
| 508 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans to period-end total loans | 0.34 |
| 0.26 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | $ | 45 |
| $ | (18 | ) | NM |
| | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | 344 | % |
Nonperforming assets | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans: | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans retained(a) | $ | 659 |
| $ | 452 |
| 46 | % | | $ | 659 |
| | $ | 452 |
| | 46 | % |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | — |
| 5 |
| NM |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | NM |
|
Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 659 |
| $ | 457 |
| 44 |
| | $ | 659 |
| | $ | 457 |
| | 44 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | 19 |
| 2 |
| NM |
| | 19 |
| | 2 |
| | NM |
|
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 678 |
| $ | 459 |
| 48 |
| | $ | 678 |
| | $ | 459 |
| | 48 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 2,759 |
| $ | 2,619 |
| 5 |
| | $ | 2,759 |
| | $ | 2,619 |
| | 5 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 293 |
| 249 |
| 18 |
| | 293 |
| | 249 |
| | 18 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 3,052 |
| $ | 2,868 |
| 6 | % | | $ | 3,052 |
| | $ | 2,868 |
| | 6 | % |
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(b) | 0.09 | % | (0.03 | )% | | | 0.05 | % | | 0.01 | % | | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained | 1.32 |
| 1.28 |
| | | 1.32 |
| | 1.28 |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a) | 419 |
| 579 |
| | | 419 |
| | 579 |
| | |
Nonaccrual loans to period-end total loans | 0.31 |
| 0.22 |
| | | 0.31 |
| | 0.22 |
| | |
| |
(a) | Allowance for loan losses of $119$175 million and $105$132 million was held against nonaccrual loans retained at September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate. |
|
| | | | |
ASSET & WEALTH MANAGEMENT |
Refer to pages 74–76 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K and Line of Business Metrics on pages 174–175178–179 for a discussion of the business profile of AWM. |
| | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended March 31, |
2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Revenue | | | |
Asset management, administration and commissions | $ | 2,706 |
| $ | 2,416 |
| 12 | % |
All other income | 3 |
| 177 |
| (98 | ) |
Noninterest revenue | 2,709 |
| 2,593 |
| 4 |
|
Net interest income | 897 |
| 896 |
| — |
|
Total net revenue | 3,606 |
| 3,489 |
| 3 |
|
| | | |
Provision for credit losses | 94 |
| 2 |
| NM |
|
| | | |
Noninterest expense | | | |
Compensation expense | 1,411 |
| 1,462 |
| (3 | ) |
Noncompensation expense | 1,248 |
| 1,185 |
| 5 |
|
Total noninterest expense | 2,659 |
| 2,647 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Income before income tax expense | 853 |
| 840 |
| 2 |
|
Income tax expense | 189 |
| 179 |
| 6 |
|
Net income | $ | 664 |
| $ | 661 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Revenue by line of business | | | |
Asset Management | $ | 1,740 |
| $ | 1,761 |
| (1 | ) |
Wealth Management | 1,866 |
| 1,728 |
| 8 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 3,606 |
| $ | 3,489 |
| 3 | % |
| | | |
Financial ratios | | | |
Return on equity | 25 | % | 25 | % | |
Overhead ratio | 74 |
| 76 |
| |
Pre-tax margin ratio: | | | |
Asset Management | 24 |
| 23 |
| |
Wealth Management | 24 |
| 25 |
| |
Asset & Wealth Management | 24 |
| 24 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement data | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | |
Asset management, administration and commissions | $ | 2,574 |
| $ | 2,563 |
| — | % | | $ | 7,558 |
| $ | 7,623 |
| (1 | )% |
All other income | 139 |
| 117 |
| 19 |
| | 431 |
| 374 |
| 15 |
|
Noninterest revenue | 2,713 |
| 2,680 |
| 1 |
| | 7,989 |
| 7,997 |
| — |
|
Net interest income | 855 |
| 879 |
| (3 | ) | | 2,627 |
| 2,640 |
| — |
|
Total net revenue | 3,568 |
| 3,559 |
| — |
| | 10,616 |
| 10,637 |
| — |
|
| | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 44 |
| 23 |
| 91 |
| | 48 |
| 40 |
| 20 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | | | |
Compensation expense | 1,391 |
| 1,391 |
| — |
| | 4,259 |
| 4,112 |
| 4 |
|
Noncompensation expense | 1,231 |
| 1,194 |
| 3 |
| | 3,606 |
| 3,620 |
| — |
|
Total noninterest expense | 2,622 |
| 2,585 |
| 1 |
| | 7,865 |
| 7,732 |
| 2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Income before income tax expense | 902 |
| 951 |
| (5 | ) | | 2,703 |
| 2,865 |
| (6 | ) |
Income tax expense | 234 |
| 227 |
| 3 |
| | 655 |
| 616 |
| 6 |
|
Net income | $ | 668 |
| $ | 724 |
| (8 | ) | | $ | 2,048 |
| $ | 2,249 |
| (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Revenue by line of business | | | | | | | |
Asset Management | $ | 1,816 |
| $ | 1,827 |
| (1 | ) | | $ | 5,362 |
| $ | 5,440 |
| (1 | ) |
Wealth Management | 1,752 |
| 1,732 |
| 1 |
| | 5,254 |
| 5,197 |
| 1 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 3,568 |
| $ | 3,559 |
| — | % | | $ | 10,616 |
| $ | 10,637 |
| — | % |
| | | | | | | |
Financial ratios | | | | | | | |
Return on equity | 24 | % | 31 | % | | | 25 | % | 32 | % | |
Overhead ratio | 73 |
| 73 |
| | | 74 |
| 73 |
| |
Pre-tax margin ratio: | | | | | | | |
Asset Management | 25 |
| 27 |
| | | 25 |
| 27 |
| |
Wealth Management | 25 |
| 26 |
| | | 26 |
| 27 |
| |
Asset & Wealth Management | 25 |
| 27 |
| | | 25 |
| 27 |
| |
Quarterly results
Net income was $668$664 million, a decrease of 8%.flat versus the prior year.
Net revenue of $3.6 billion was flat. Net interest income was $855 million, downup 3%, driven by deposit margin compression, largely offset by deposit and loan growth. Noninterest revenue was $2.7 billion, up 1%, driven by higher average market levels.
The provision for credit losses was $44 million, driven by net charge-offs, as well as net additions to the allowance for loan losses predominantly due to loan growth.
Noninterest expense was $2.6 billion, an increase of 1%, predominantly driven by continued investments in technology and advisors, partially offset by lower distribution and legal fees.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $2.0 billion, a decrease of 9%.
Net revenue of $10.6 billion was flat. Net interest income of $2.6 billion$897 million was flat, reflecting deposit and loan growth, offset by deposit margin compression. Noninterest revenue was $2.7 billion, up 4%, largely driven by:
higher asset management fees as a result of $8.0higher asset values at the beginning of 2020 driven by higher average market levels, and strong net inflows into long-term products over the past year despite the impact of market volatility in March, and
increased brokerage commissions on higher client-driven volume particularly in March,
largely offset by
net valuation losses on certain investments, compared with gains in the prior year.
Revenue from Asset Management was $1.7 billion, down 1%, driven by:
net valuation losses on certain investments, compared with gains in the prior year,
largely offset by
higher asset management fees as a result of higher average market levels, despite the impact of market volatility in March.
Revenue from Wealth Management was $1.9 billion, up 8%, predominantly driven by:
increased brokerage commissions on higher client-driven volume particularly in March,
deposit and loan growth, and
higher asset management fees as a result of higher average market levels and strong net inflows into long-term products over the past year, despite the impact of market volatility in March,
partially offset by
deposit margin compression.
Noninterest expense of $2.7 billion was flat, reflecting a shift in the mix toward lower fee productsas higher investments and lower brokerage activity,volume-and revenue-related expense, were predominantly offset by higher net investment valuation gains.lower structural expense.
The provision for credit losses was $48$94 million, driven by net charge-offs, as well as net additions to the allowance for loancredit losses predominantly due tofrom the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as loan growth.
Noninterest expense was $7.9 billion, an increaseRefer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 50–66 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 64–65 for further discussions of 2%, predominantly driven by continued investments in technologythe credit portfolios and advisors, partially offset by lower distribution fees.the allowance for credit losses.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ranking data, headcount and ratios) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
% of JPM mutual fund assets rated as 4- or 5-star(a) | 62 | % | 60 | % | |
% of JPM mutual fund assets ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b) | | | |
1 year | 69 |
| 72 |
| |
3 years | 74 |
| 78 |
| |
5 years | 78 |
| 86 |
| |
| | | |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end)(c) | | | |
Total assets | $ | 186,102 |
| $ | 165,865 |
| 12 | % |
Loans | 166,058 |
| 143,750 |
| 16 |
|
Deposits | 168,561 |
| 143,348 |
| 18 |
|
Equity | 10,500 |
| 10,500 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Selected balance sheet data (average)(c) | | | |
Total assets | $ | 183,316 |
| $ | 167,358 |
| 10 |
|
Loans | 161,823 |
| 145,406 |
| 11 |
|
Deposits | 150,631 |
| 138,235 |
| 9 |
|
Equity | 10,500 |
| 10,500 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Headcount | 23,830 |
| 24,347 |
| (2 | ) |
| | | |
Number of Wealth Management client advisors | 2,878 |
| 2,877 |
| — |
|
| | | |
Credit data and quality statistics(c) | | | |
Net charge-offs | $ | 2 |
| $ | 4 |
| (50 | ) |
Nonaccrual loans | 304 |
| 285 |
| 7 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 438 |
| $ | 325 |
| 35 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 14 |
| 18 |
| (22 | ) |
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 452 |
| $ | 343 |
| 32 | % |
Net charge-off rate | — |
| 0.01 | % | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans | 0.26 |
| 0.23 |
| |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans | 144 |
| 114 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans | 0.18 |
| 0.20 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected metrics | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ranking data, headcount and ratios) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
% of JPM mutual fund assets rated as 4- or 5-star(a) | 65 | % | 64 | % | | | 65 | % | 64 | % | |
% of JPM mutual fund assets ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b) | | | | | | | |
1 year | 74 |
| 65 |
| | | 74 |
| 65 |
| |
3 years | 80 |
| 64 |
| | | 80 |
| 64 |
| |
5 years | 86 |
| 83 |
| | | 86 |
| 83 |
| |
| | | | | | | |
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 174,226 |
| $ | 166,716 |
| 5 | % | | $ | 174,226 |
| $ | 166,716 |
| 5 | % |
Loans | 153,245 |
| 143,162 |
| 7 |
| | 153,245 |
| 143,162 |
| 7 |
|
Core loans | 153,245 |
| 143,162 |
| 7 |
| | 153,245 |
| 143,162 |
| 7 |
|
Deposits | 138,439 |
| 130,497 |
| 6 |
| | 138,439 |
| 130,497 |
| 6 |
|
Equity | 10,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 17 |
| | 10,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 17 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Selected balance sheet data (average) | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 171,121 |
| $ | 161,982 |
| 6 |
| | $ | 168,688 |
| $ | 158,218 |
| 7 |
|
Loans | 150,486 |
| 140,558 |
| 7 |
| | 147,481 |
| 136,663 |
| 8 |
|
Core loans | 150,486 |
| 140,558 |
| 7 |
| | 147,481 |
| 136,663 |
| 8 |
|
Deposits | 138,822 |
| 133,021 |
| 4 |
| | 139,127 |
| 138,885 |
| — |
|
Equity | 10,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 17 |
| | 10,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 17 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Headcount | 24,228 |
| 23,747 |
| 2 |
| | 24,228 |
| 23,747 |
| 2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Number of Wealth Management client advisors | 2,872 |
| 2,808 |
| 2 |
| | 2,872 |
| 2,808 |
| 2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Credit data and quality statistics | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs | $ | 26 |
| $ | 11 |
| 136 |
| | $ | 27 |
| $ | 7 |
| 286 |
|
Nonaccrual loans | 176 |
| 285 |
| (38 | ) | | 176 |
| 285 |
| (38 | ) |
Allowance for credit losses: | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 350 |
| $ | 317 |
| 10 |
| | $ | 350 |
| $ | 317 |
| 10 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | 16 |
| 15 |
| 7 |
| | 16 |
| 15 |
| 7 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 366 |
| $ | 332 |
| 10 | % | | $ | 366 |
| $ | 332 |
| 10 | % |
Net charge-off rate | 0.07 | % | 0.03 | % | | | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans | 0.23 |
| 0.22 |
| | | 0.23 |
| 0.22 |
| |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans | 199 |
| 111 |
| | | 199 |
| 111 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans | 0.11 |
| 0.20 |
| | | 0.11 |
| 0.20 |
| |
| |
(a) | Represents the “overall star rating” derived from Morningstar for the U.S., the U.K., Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Taiwan domiciled funds; and Nomura “star rating” for Japan domiciled funds and Morningstar for all other domiciled funds. Includes only Asset Management retail open-ended mutual funds that have a rating. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil and India domiciled funds. |
| |
(b) | Quartile ranking sourced from:from Lipper, for the U.S. and Taiwan domiciled funds; Morningstar, for the U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong domiciled funds; Nomura for Japan domiciled funds and Fund Doctor for South Korea domiciled funds.based on country of domicile. Includes only Asset Management retail open-ended mutual funds that are ranked by the aforementioned sources. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil and India domiciled funds. |
| |
(c) | Loans, deposits and related credit data and quality statistics relate to the Wealth Management business. |
Client assets of $3.1$3.0 trillion and assets under management of $2.2 trillion were up 4% and 7% and 8% respectively, predominantly driven by cumulative net inflows, into long-term and liquidity products as well as higherpartially offset by the impact of lower market levels globally.at the end of the quarter.
| | Client assets | | | | |
| September 30, | As of March 31, |
(in billions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Assets by asset class | | | | |
Liquidity | $ | 505 |
| $ | 463 |
| 9 | % | $ | 618 |
| $ | 476 |
| 30 | % |
Fixed income | 590 |
| 457 |
| 29 |
| 586 |
| 495 |
| 18 |
|
Equity | 437 |
| 452 |
| (3 | ) | 369 |
| 427 |
| (14 | ) |
Multi-asset and alternatives | 714 |
| 705 |
| 1 |
| 666 |
| 698 |
| (5 | ) |
Total assets under management | 2,246 |
| 2,077 |
| 8 |
| 2,239 |
| 2,096 |
| 7 |
|
Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits | 815 |
| 790 |
| 3 |
| 763 |
| 801 |
| (5 | ) |
Total client assets | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
| 7 |
| $ | 3,002 |
| $ | 2,897 |
| 4 |
|
| | | | |
Memo: | | | | |
Alternatives client assets (a) | $ | 183 |
| $ | 172 |
| 6 |
| $ | 188 |
| $ | 172 |
| 9 |
|
| | | | |
Assets by client segment | | | | |
Private Banking | $ | 636 |
| $ | 576 |
| 10 |
| $ | 617 |
| $ | 597 |
| 3 |
|
Institutional | 1,029 |
| 945 |
| 9 |
| 1,097 |
| 943 |
| 16 |
|
Retail | 581 |
| 556 |
| 4 |
| 525 |
| 556 |
| (6 | ) |
Total assets under management | $ | 2,246 |
| $ | 2,077 |
| 8 |
| $ | 2,239 |
| $ | 2,096 |
| 7 |
|
| | | | |
Private Banking | $ | 1,424 |
| $ | 1,339 |
| 6 |
| $ | 1,355 |
| $ | 1,371 |
| (1 | ) |
Institutional | 1,051 |
| 967 |
| 9 |
| 1,118 |
| 965 |
| 16 |
|
Retail | 586 |
| 561 |
| 4 |
| 529 |
| 561 |
| (6 | ) |
Total client assets | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
| 7 | % | $ | 3,002 |
| $ | 2,897 |
| 4 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents assets under management, as well as client balances in brokerage accounts |
|
| | | | | | |
Client assets (continued) | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in billions) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Assets under management rollforward | | |
Beginning balance | $ | 2,364 |
| $ | 1,987 |
|
Net asset flows: | | |
Liquidity | 75 |
| (5 | ) |
Fixed income | 1 |
| 19 |
|
Equity | (1 | ) | (6 | ) |
Multi-asset and alternatives | (2 | ) | (3 | ) |
Market/performance/other impacts | (198 | ) | 104 |
|
Ending balance, March 31 | $ | 2,239 |
| $ | 2,096 |
|
| | |
Client assets rollforward | | |
Beginning balance | $ | 3,226 |
| $ | 2,733 |
|
Net asset flows | 85 |
| 9 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts | (309 | ) | 155 |
|
Ending balance, March 31 | $ | 3,002 |
| $ | 2,897 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Client assets (continued) | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in billions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Assets under management rollforward | | | | | |
Beginning balance | $ | 2,178 |
| $ | 2,028 |
| | $ | 1,987 |
| $ | 2,034 |
|
Net asset flows: | | | | | |
Liquidity | 24 |
| 14 |
| | 23 |
| 10 |
|
Fixed income | 41 |
| 3 |
| | 97 |
| (9 | ) |
Equity | (2 | ) | 1 |
| | (9 | ) | 8 |
|
Multi-asset and alternatives | 1 |
| 4 |
| | (2 | ) | 29 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts | 4 |
| 27 |
| | 150 |
| 5 |
|
Ending balance, September 30 | $ | 2,246 |
| $ | 2,077 |
| | $ | 2,246 |
| $ | 2,077 |
|
| | | | | |
Client assets rollforward | | | | | |
Beginning balance | $ | 2,998 |
| $ | 2,799 |
| | $ | 2,733 |
| $ | 2,789 |
|
Net asset flows | 59 |
| 33 |
| | 120 |
| 58 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts | 4 |
| 35 |
| | 208 |
| 20 |
|
Ending balance, September 30 | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
| | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
International metrics | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue (a) | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 623 |
| $ | 695 |
| (10 | )% |
Asia-Pacific | 400 |
| 364 |
| 10 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 188 |
| 182 |
| 3 |
|
Total international net revenue | 1,211 |
| 1,241 |
| (2 | ) |
North America | 2,395 |
| 2,248 |
| 7 |
|
Total net revenue(a) | $ | 3,606 |
| $ | 3,489 |
| 3 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
International metrics | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
Total net revenue (a) | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 672 |
| $ | 677 |
| (1 | )% | | $ | 2,014 |
| $ | 2,095 |
| (4 | )% |
Asia/Pacific | 376 |
| 377 |
| — |
| | 1,104 |
| 1,161 |
| (5 | ) |
Latin America/Caribbean | 218 |
| 228 |
| (4 | ) | | 658 |
| 689 |
| (4 | ) |
Total international net revenue | 1,266 |
| 1,282 |
| (1 | ) | | 3,776 |
| 3,945 |
| (4 | ) |
North America | 2,302 |
| 2,277 |
| 1 |
| | 6,840 |
| 6,692 |
| 2 |
|
Total net revenue(a) | $ | 3,568 |
| $ | 3,559 |
| — |
| | $ | 10,616 |
| $ | 10,637 |
| — | % |
| |
(a) | Regional revenue is based on the domicile of the client. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, |
(in billions) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Change |
|
Assets under management | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 395 |
| $ | 378 |
| 4 | % |
Asia-Pacific | 174 |
| 178 |
| (2 | ) |
Latin America/Caribbean | 56 |
| 54 |
| 4 |
|
Total international assets under management | 625 |
| 610 |
| 2 |
|
North America | 1,614 |
| 1,486 |
| 9 |
|
Total assets under management | $ | 2,239 |
| $ | 2,096 |
| 7 |
|
| | | |
Client assets | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 479 |
| $ | 461 |
| 4 |
|
Asia-Pacific | 248 |
| 247 |
| — |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 134 |
| 132 |
| 2 |
|
Total international client assets | 861 |
| 840 |
| 2 |
|
North America | 2,141 |
| 2,057 |
| 4 |
|
Total client assets | $ | 3,002 |
| $ | 2,897 |
| 4 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in billions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Change |
|
Assets under management | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 387 |
| $ | 375 |
| 3 | % | | $ | 387 |
| $ | 375 |
| 3 | % |
Asia/Pacific | 183 |
| 164 |
| 12 |
| | 183 |
| 164 |
| 12 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 70 |
| 65 |
| 8 |
| | 70 |
| 65 |
| 8 |
|
Total international assets under management | 640 |
| 604 |
| 6 |
| | 640 |
| 604 |
| 6 |
|
North America | 1,606 |
| 1,473 |
| 9 |
| | 1,606 |
| 1,473 |
| 9 |
|
Total assets under management | $ | 2,246 |
| $ | 2,077 |
| 8 |
| | $ | 2,246 |
| $ | 2,077 |
| 8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Client assets | | | | | | | |
Europe/Middle East/Africa | $ | 455 |
| $ | 435 |
| 5 |
| | $ | 455 |
| $ | 435 |
| 5 |
|
Asia/Pacific | 253 |
| 228 |
| 11 |
| | 253 |
| 228 |
| 11 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean | 172 |
| 162 |
| 6 |
| | 172 |
| 162 |
| 6 |
|
Total international client assets | 880 |
| 825 |
| 7 |
| | 880 |
| 825 |
| 7 |
|
North America | 2,181 |
| 2,042 |
| 7 |
| | 2,181 |
| 2,042 |
| 7 |
|
Total client assets | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
| 7 | % | | $ | 3,061 |
| $ | 2,867 |
| 7 | % |
Refer to pages 77–78 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of Corporate.
| | Selected income statement and balance sheet data | Selected income statement and balance sheet data | | | | | | | Selected income statement and balance sheet data |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, | As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | Change |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | Change |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal transactions | $ | 10 |
| $ | (161 | ) | | NM |
| | $ | (227 | ) | | $ | (222 | ) | | (2 | )% | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | | (82 | )% |
Investment securities gains/(losses) | 78 |
| (46 | ) | | NM |
| | 135 |
| | (371 | ) | | NM | |
Investment securities gains | | 233 |
| 13 |
| | NM |
|
All other income | 32 |
| 30 |
| | 7 | % | | 95 |
| | 373 |
| | (75) | 211 |
| 57 |
| | 270 | % |
Noninterest revenue | 120 |
| (177 | ) | | NM |
| | 3 |
| | (220 | ) | | NM | 331 |
| 8 |
| | NM |
|
Net interest income | 572 |
| 74 |
| | NM |
| | 1,436 |
| | (35 | ) | | NM | (165 | ) | 417 |
| | NM |
|
Total net revenue(a) | 692 |
| (103 | ) | | NM |
| | 1,439 |
| | (255 | ) | | NM | 166 |
| 425 |
| | (61 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | — |
| 2 |
| | NM |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | NM | 8 |
| 2 |
| | 300 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense(b) | 281 |
| 28 |
| | NM |
| | 724 |
| | 394 |
| | 84 | 146 |
| 211 |
| | (31 | )% |
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) | 411 |
| (133 | ) | | NM |
| | 715 |
| | (646 | ) | | NM | |
Income before income tax expense/(benefit) | | 12 |
| 212 |
| | (94 | )% |
Income tax expense/(benefit) | 18 |
| 12 |
| | 50 |
| | (757 | ) | | 18 |
| | NM | 137 |
| (39 | ) | | NM |
|
Net income/(loss) | $ | 393 |
| $ | (145 | ) | | NM |
| | $ | 1,472 |
| | $ | (664 | ) | | NM | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 251 |
| | NM |
|
Total net revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury and CIO | $ | 801 |
| $ | 186 |
| | 331 |
| | $ | 1,930 |
| | $ | 235 |
| | NM | $ | 169 |
| $ | 511 |
| | (67 | ) |
Other Corporate | (109 | ) | (289 | ) | | 62 |
| | (491 | ) | | (490 | ) | | — | (3 | ) | (86 | ) | | 97 |
|
Total net revenue | $ | 692 |
| $ | (103 | ) | | NM |
| | $ | 1,439 |
| | $ | (255 | ) | | NM | $ | 166 |
| $ | 425 |
| | (61 | ) |
Net income/(loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury and CIO | $ | 576 |
| $ | 96 |
| | 500 |
| | $ | 1,372 |
| | $ | (244 | ) | | NM | $ | 83 |
| $ | 334 |
| | (75 | ) |
Other Corporate | (183 | ) | (241 | ) | | 24 |
| | 100 |
| | (420 | ) | | NM | (208 | ) | (83 | ) | | (151 | ) |
Total net income/(loss) | $ | 393 |
| $ | (145 | ) | | NM |
| | $ | 1,472 |
| | $ | (664 | ) | | NM | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 251 |
| | NM |
|
Total assets (period-end) | $ | 812,333 |
| $ | 742,693 |
| | 9 |
| | $ | 812,333 |
| | $ | 742,693 |
| | 9 | $ | 981,937 |
| $ | 796,615 |
| | 23 |
|
Loans (period-end) | 1,705 |
| 1,556 |
| | 10 |
| | 1,705 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 10 | 1,650 |
| 1,885 |
| | (12 | ) |
Core loans(c) | 1,706 |
| 1,556 |
| | 10 |
| | 1,706 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 10 | |
Headcount | 38,155 |
| 36,686 |
| | 4 | % | | 38,155 |
| | 36,686 |
| | 4 | % | 38,785 |
| 37,502 |
| | 3 | % |
| |
(a) | Included tax-equivalent adjustments, driven by tax-exempt income from municipal bonds, of $74$61 million and $94$86 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $241 million and $287 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Included a net legal benefit of $(32)$(20) million and $(175)$(90) million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $(189) million and $(225) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(c) | Average core loans were $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $1.7 billion for both the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. |
Quarterly results
Net incomeloss was $393$125 million compared with a net lossincome of $145$251 million in the prior year.
Net revenue was $692$166 million, compared with a net loss of $103$425 million in the prior year,year. The decrease was driven by higherlower net interest income and noninterest revenue. Net interest income was driven by balance sheet growth and changes in mix, partiallyon lower rates, largely offset by lower rates. Net interest income also includes income relatedhigher noninterest revenue primarily due to higher net investment securities gains reflecting the unwindimpact of repositioning the internal funding provided to CCB upon the sale of certain mortgage loans. The income reflects the net present value of that fundinginvestment securities portfolio, and is recognized as a charge to net interest income in CCB. Refer to CCB on pages 23–24 of this Form 10-Q and Funds Transfer Pricing (“FTP”) on page 60 of the Firm’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information.
Noninterest revenue increased reflecting small net gainsmarket-driven impacts on certain legacy private equity investments compared to net losses in the prior year.Corporate investments.
Noninterest expense of $281$146 million was up $253down $65 million due to higher investments in technology andlower structural expense, largely offset by a lower net legal benefit compared withto the prior year.
The current period includedincome tax benefits relatedexpense was driven by the change in the level and mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal, and state and local taxes and more specifically, the impact of the Firm’s estimated full-year expected tax rate relative to the resolutionlevel of certain tax audits as well as other tax adjustments, which were partially offset by changes to certain tax reserves. The prior year reflected a net benefit of $132 million resulting from changes in estimates underpretax income for the TCJA related to the remeasurement of certain deferred taxes and the deemed repatriation tax on non-U.S. earnings, which was more than offset by changes to certain tax reserves and other tax adjustments.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $1.5 billion, compared with a net loss of $664 million in the prior year.
Net revenue was $1.4 billion, compared with a net loss of $255 million in the prior year driven by higher net interest income and noninterest revenue. Net interest income was
driven by balance sheet growth and changes in mix and includes the income related to the unwind of the internal funding, as mentioned above.
Noninterest revenue increased reflecting:
investment securities gains compared with losses in the prior year due to the repositioning of the investment securities portfolio
lower net valuation losses on certain legacy private equity investments,
partially offset by
losses on cash deployment transactions which were more than offset by the related net interest income earned on those transactions.quarter.
Noninterest expense of $724 million, was up $330 million reflecting:
higher investments in technology and real estate,
contributions to the Firm’s Foundation, whereas all prior-year contributions were made in the fourth quarter, and
higher pension costs due to changes to actuarial assumptions and estimates.
The prior year included a $174 million loss on the liquidation of a legal entity.
The current period included tax benefits of $957 million related to the resolution of certain tax audits, as well as other tax adjustments partially offset by changes in certain tax reserves. The prior year expense reflected changes to certain tax reserves, largely offset by a net benefit of $305 million resulting from changes in estimates under the TCJA related to the remeasurement of certain deferred taxes and the deemed repatriation tax on non-U.S. earnings as well as other tax adjustments.
Treasury and CIO overview
At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, the average credit rating of the Treasury and CIO investment securities comprising the portfolio in the table below was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s)risk ratings). Refer to Note 910 for further information on the Firm’s investment securities portfolio.portfolio and internal risk ratings.
Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 for further information on liquidity and funding risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 70–7467–71 for information on interest rate, foreign exchange and other risks.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement and balance sheet data | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, | | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | Change |
Investment securities gains/(losses) | $ | 78 |
| | $ | (46 | ) | | NM | | $ | 135 |
| | $ | (371 | ) | | NM |
Available-for-sale (“AFS”) investment securities (average) | $ | 305,894 |
| | $ | 197,230 |
| | 55 | | $ | 260,661 |
| | $ | 200,569 |
| | 30 |
Held-to-maturity (“HTM”) investment securities (average) | 35,494 |
| | 31,232 |
| | 14 | | 32,518 |
| | 31,842 |
| | 2 |
Investment securities portfolio (average) | $ | 341,388 |
| | $ | 228,462 |
| | 49 | | $ | 293,179 |
| | $ | 232,411 |
| | 26 |
AFS investment securities (period-end) | $ | 351,599 |
| | $ | 198,523 |
| | 77 | | $ | 351,599 |
| | $ | 198,523 |
| | 77 |
HTM investment securities (period-end) | 40,830 |
| | 31,368 |
| | 30 | | 40,830 |
| | 31,368 |
| | 30 |
Investment securities portfolio (period-end) | $ | 392,429 |
| | $ | 229,891 |
| | 71 | | $ | 392,429 |
| | $ | 229,891 |
| | 71 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Selected income statement and balance sheet data |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| | Change |
Investment securities gains | $ | 233 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | NM |
Available-for-sale securities (average) | $ | 372,954 |
| | $ | 226,605 |
| | 65 |
Held-to-maturity securities (average) | 46,673 |
| | 31,082 |
| | 50 |
Investment securities portfolio (average) | $ | 419,627 |
| | $ | 257,687 |
| | 63 |
Available-for-sale securities (period-end) | $ | 397,891 |
| | $ | 234,832 |
| | 69 |
Held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for credit losses (period-end)(a)(b) | 71,200 |
| | 30,849 |
| | 131 |
Investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses (period-end)(a) | $ | 469,091 |
| | $ | 265,681 |
| | 77 |
| |
(a) | At March 31, 2020, the allowance for credit losses on HTM securities was $19 million. |
| |
(b) | During the first quarter of 2020, the Firm transferred $26.1 billion of U.S. GSE and government agency MBS from AFS to HTM for capital management purposes. |
Refer to Note 10 for further information.
|
| | | | |
ENTERPRISE-WIDEFIRMWIDE RISK MANAGEMENT |
Risk is an inherent part of JPMorgan Chase’s business activities. When the Firm extends a consumer or wholesale loan, advises customers and clients on their investment decisions, makes markets in securities, or offers other products or services, the Firm takes on some degree of risk. The Firm’s overall objective is to manage its businesses, and the associated risks, in a manner that balances serving the interests of its clients, customers and investors and protects the safety and soundness of the Firm.
The Firm believes that effective risk management requires:requires, among other things:
Acceptance of responsibility, including identification and escalation of risk issues, by all individuals within the Firm;
Ownership of risk identification, assessment, data and management within each of the lines of businessLOBs and Corporate; and
Firmwide structures for risk governance.
The Firm strives for continual improvement throughin its efforts to enhance controls, ongoing employee training and development, talent retention, and other measures. The Firm follows a disciplined and balanced compensation framework with strong internal governance and independent oversight by the Board oversight.of Directors (the “Board”). The impact of risk and control issues areis carefully considered in the Firm’s performance evaluation and incentive compensation processes.
Firmwide Risk Management is overseengovernance and managed on an enterprise-wide basis. oversight framework
The Firm’s risk management governance and oversight framework involves understanding drivers of risks, types of risks, and impacts of risks.
Refer to pages 79-83 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of Enterprise-wideFirmwide risk management governance and oversight.
Effective July 2019, the Board of Directors’ Risk Policy Committee (“DRPC”) was renamed the Risk Committee. The committee’s responsibilities were not changed. Refer to page 81 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the committee.
Governancegovernance and Oversight Functionsoversight functions
The following sections of this Form 10-Q and the 20182019 Form 10-K discuss the risk governance and oversight functions in place to manage the risks inherent in the Firm’s business activities.
| | Risk governance and oversight functions | Form 10-Q page reference | Form 10-K page reference | Form 10-Q page reference | Form 10-K page reference |
Strategic risk | | 84 | | 84 |
Capital risk | 45–49 | 85–94 | 39–44 | 85–92 |
Liquidity risk | 50–54 | 95–100 | 45–49 | 93–98 |
Reputation risk | | 101 | | 99 |
Consumer credit risk | 56–59 | 106-111 | 52–55 | 103–107 |
Wholesale credit risk | 60–66 | 112-119 | 56–63 | 108–115 |
Investment portfolio risk | 69 | 123 | 66 | 118 |
Market risk | 70–74 | 124-131 | 67–71 | 119–126 |
Country risk | 75 | 132–133 | 72 | 127–128 |
Operational risk | | 134-136 | 45 | 129–135 |
Compliance risk | | 137 | | 132 |
Conduct risk | | 138 | | 133 |
Legal risk | | 139 | | 134 |
Estimations and Model risk | | 140 | 74 | 135 |
Capital risk is the risk the Firm has an insufficient level andor composition of capital to support the Firm’s business activities and associated risks during normal economic environments and under stressed conditions.
Refer to pages 85-9485–92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form
10-K, Note 2122 of this Form 10-Q and the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for a further discussion of the Firm’s Capital Risk Management, including capital planning and stress testing.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The Firm remains well-capitalized, but has been impacted by recent market events as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The continuation or further deterioration of the current macroeconomic environment could result in additional impacts to the Firms capital and leverage position.
Basel III Overview
The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. bank holding companies (“BHC”) and banks, including the Firm and its insured depository institution (“IDI”) subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The minimum amount of regulatory capital that must be held by BHCs and banks is determined by calculating risk-weighted assets (“RWA”), which are on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures, weighted according to risk. Two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III
Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). Effective January 1, 2019,For each of the risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm is evaluated against the fully phased-in measures under Basel III and represents the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches. During 2018, the required capital measures were subject to the transitional rules and as of December 31, 2018 the calculations were the same on a fully phased-in and on a transitional basis.
The Firm’s Basel III Standardized risk-basedStandardized-risk-based ratios are currently more binding than the Basel III Advanced risk-based ratios, and the Firm expects that this will remain the case for the foreseeable future.Advanced-risk-based ratios.
Basel III also includes a requirement for Advanced Approach banking organizations, including the Firm, to calculate the SLR. Refer to SLR on page 9190 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.
Key Regulatory Developments
Current Expected Credit Losses. As disclosed in the Firm’s 2019 Form 10-K, the Firm initially elected to phase-in the January 1, 2020 (“day 1”) CECL adoption impact to retained earnings of $2.7 billion to CET1 capital, at 25% per year in each of 2020 to 2023. As part of their response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 31, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that provided the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three-year transition period (“CECL capital transition provisions”).
The interim final rule provides a uniform approach for estimating the effects of CECL compared to the legacy incurred loss model during the first two years of the transition period (the “day 2” transition amount), whereby the Firm may exclude from CET1 capital 25% of the change in the allowance for credit losses (excluding allowances on PCD loans). The cumulative day 2 transition amount as at December 31, 2021 that is not recognized in CET1 capital as well as the $2.7 billion day 1 impact, will be phased into CET1 capital at 25% per year beginning January 1, 2022. The Firm has elected to apply the CECL capital transition provisions, and accordingly, for the period ended March 31, 2020, the capital measures of the Firm exclude $4.3 billion, which is the $2.7 billion day 1 impact to retained earnings and 25% of the $6.8 billion increase in the allowance for credit losses (excluding allowances on PCD loans).
The impacts of the CECL capital transition provisions on Tier 2 capital, adjusted average assets, and total leverage exposure have also been incorporated into the Firm’s capital measures. Refer to Note 1 for further information on SLR.the CECL accounting guidance.
Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility. On March 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve established a facility, authorized through September 30, 2020, to enhance the liquidity and functioning of money markets. Under the MMLF, the FRBB makes nonrecourse advances to participating financial institutions to purchase certain types of assets from eligible money market mutual fund clients. These assets, which are reflected in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets, are pledged to the FRBB as collateral. On March 23, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule to neutralize the effects of purchasing assets through the program on risk-based and leverage-based capital ratios. As of March 31, 2020 the Firm excluded assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided under the MMLF in the amount of $12.0 billion from its RWA and $1.2 billion from adjusted average assets and total leverage exposure.
Refer to Regulatory Developments Relating to the COVID-19 pandemic on pages 10-11 for additional information on regulatory actions and significant financing programs that the U.S. government and regulators have introduced to address the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Stress Capital Buffer. On March 4, 2020, the Federal Reserve issued the final rule introducing a stress capital buffer (“SCB”) framework for the Basel III Standardized approach that is designed to more closely integrate the results of the quantitative assessment in CCAR with the ongoing minimum capital requirements for BHCs under the U.S. Basel III rules. The final rule replaces the static 2.5% CET1 capital conservation buffer in the Standardized approach with a dynamic institution-specific SCB. The final rule does not apply to the Advanced approach capital requirements. The SCB requirement for BHCs will be effective on October 1 of each year and is expected to remain in effect until September 30 of the following year. The Firm anticipates that the Federal Reserve will disclose the Firm’s SCB requirement and summary information regarding the Firm’s stress test results by June 30, 2020. Starting on October 1, 2020, the SCB will take effect based on the 2020 CCAR submission and will be integrated into the Firm’s ongoing minimum capital requirements.
The following tables present the Firm’s risk-based and leverage-based capital measures under both the Basel III Standardized and Advanced Approaches. The Firm’s Basel III ratios exceeded regulatory minimums as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 85-9485–92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of these capital metrics.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020(b)(c) | | December 31, 2019 | | |
(in millions) | Standardized | | Advanced | | Minimum capital ratios | | Standardized(b) | | Advanced(b) | | Minimum capital ratios | |
(in millions, except ratios) | | Standardized | Advanced | | Standardized | Advanced | | Minimum capital ratios(d) |
Risk-based capital metrics: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CET1 capital | $ | 188,151 |
| | $ | 188,151 |
| | | | $ | 183,474 |
| | $ | 183,474 |
| | | $ | 183,591 |
| $ | 183,591 |
| | $ | 187,753 |
| $ | 187,753 |
| | |
Tier 1 capital | 214,831 |
| | 214,831 |
| | | | 209,093 |
| | 209,093 |
| | | 213,406 |
| 213,406 |
| | 214,432 |
| 214,432 |
| | |
Total capital | 243,500 |
| | 233,203 |
| | | | 237,511 |
| | 227,435 |
| | | 247,541 |
| 234,434 |
| | 242,589 |
| 232,112 |
| | |
Risk-weighted assets | 1,527,762 |
| | 1,435,693 |
| | | | 1,528,916 |
| | 1,421,205 |
| | | 1,598,828 |
| 1,489,134 |
| | 1,515,869 |
| 1,397,878 |
| | |
CET1 capital ratio | 12.3 | % | | 13.1 | % | | 10.5 | % | | 12.0 | % | | 12.9 | % | | 9.0 | % | 11.5 | % | 12.3 | % | | 12.4 | % | 13.4 | % | | 10.5 | % |
Tier 1 capital ratio | 14.1 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 12.0 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 14.7 |
| | 10.5 |
| 13.3 |
| 14.3 |
| | 14.1 |
| 15.3 |
| | 12.0 |
|
Total capital ratio | 15.9 |
| | 16.2 |
| | 14.0 |
| | 15.5 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 12.5 |
| 15.5 |
| 15.7 |
| | 16.0 |
| 16.6 |
| | 14.0 |
|
Leverage-based capital metrics: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted average assets(a) | $ | 2,717,852 |
| | $ | 2,717,852 |
| | | | $ | 2,589,887 |
| | $ | 2,589,887 |
| | | $ | 2,842,244 |
| $ | 2,842,244 |
| | $ | 2,730,239 |
| $ | 2,730,239 |
| | |
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.9 | % | | 7.9 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 4.0 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.5 | % | | 7.9 | % | 7.9 | % | | 4.0 | % |
Total leverage exposure | NA |
| | $ | 3,404,535 |
| | | | NA |
| | $ | 3,269,988 |
| | | NA |
| $ | 3,535,822 |
| | NA |
| $ | 3,423,431 |
| | |
SLR | NA |
| | 6.3 | % | | 5.0 | % | | NA |
| | 6.4 | % | | 5.0 | % | NA |
| 6.0 | % | | NA |
| 6.3 | % | | 5.0 | % |
| |
(a) | Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 leverage ratio,ratios, includes total quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill and other intangible assets. |
| |
(b) | The Firm’sAs of March 31, 2020, the capital ratios asmeasures reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. |
| |
(c) | As of DecemberMarch 31, 2018 were equivalent whether calculated on a transitional or fully phased-in basis.2020, the capital measures reflect the exclusion of assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided under the MMLF. |
| |
(d) | Represents minimum requirements and regulatory buffers applicable to the Firm. Refer to Note 22 for additional information. |
Capital components
The following table presents reconciliations of total stockholders’ equity to Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 264,348 |
| $ | 256,515 |
| $ | 261,262 |
| $ | 261,330 |
|
Less: Preferred stock(a) | 28,363 |
| 26,068 |
| 30,063 |
| 26,993 |
|
Common stockholders’ equity | 235,985 |
| 230,447 |
| 231,199 |
| 234,337 |
|
Add: | | |
Certain deferred tax liabilities(a) | | 2,389 |
| 2,381 |
|
Less: | | |
Goodwill | 47,818 |
| 47,471 |
| 47,800 |
| 47,823 |
|
Other intangible assets | 841 |
| 748 |
| 800 |
| 819 |
|
Other CET1 capital adjustments | 1,546 |
| 1,034 |
| |
Add: | | |
Deferred tax liabilities(b) | 2,371 |
| 2,280 |
| |
Other CET1 capital adjustments(b) | | 1,397 |
| 323 |
|
Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital | 188,151 |
| 183,474 |
| 183,591 |
| 187,753 |
|
Preferred stock(a) | 28,363 |
| 26,068 |
| 30,063 |
| 26,993 |
|
Less: Other Tier 1 adjustments(a) | 1,683 |
| 449 |
| 248 |
| 314 |
|
Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital | $ | 214,831 |
| $ | 209,093 |
| $ | 213,406 |
| $ | 214,432 |
|
Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 capital | $ | 14,145 |
| $ | 13,772 |
| $ | 15,264 |
| $ | 13,733 |
|
Qualifying allowance for credit losses(c) | 14,400 |
| 14,500 |
| 18,748 |
| 14,314 |
|
Other | 124 |
| 146 |
| 123 |
| 110 |
|
Standardized Tier 2 capital | $ | 28,669 |
| $ | 28,418 |
| $ | 34,135 |
| $ | 28,157 |
|
Standardized Total capital | $ | 243,500 |
| $ | 237,511 |
| $ | 247,541 |
| $ | 242,589 |
|
Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses for Advanced Tier 2 capital(d) | (10,297 | ) | (10,076 | ) | (13,107 | ) | (10,477 | ) |
Advanced Tier 2 capital | $ | 18,372 |
| $ | 18,342 |
| $ | 21,028 |
| $ | 17,680 |
|
Advanced Total capital | $ | 233,203 |
| $ | 227,435 |
| $ | 234,434 |
| $ | 232,112 |
|
| |
(a) | As of September 30, 2019, preferred stock reflects the issuance of $2.25 billion of Series FF preferred stock and redemption of $880 million of Series W preferred stock. Other Tier 1 adjustments includes $1.37 billion of Series I preferred stock called for partial redemption on September 26, 2019 and subsequently redeemed on October 30, 2019. Tier 1 capital as of September 30, 2019 reflects the issuance and redemptions.
|
| |
(b) | Represents certain deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating CET1 capital. |
| |
(b) | As of March 31, 2020, the impact of the CECL capital transition provision was an increase in CET1 capital of $4.3 billion. |
| |
(c) | Represents the allowance for credit losses eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. |
| |
(d) | Represents an adjustment to qualifying allowance for credit losses for the excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses up to 0.6% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. |
Capital rollforward
The following table presents the changes in Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020.
| | Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | 2019 |
| |
Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2018 | $ | 183,474 |
| |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | 2020 |
|
Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 187,753 |
|
Net income applicable to common equity | 26,710 |
| 2,444 |
|
Dividends declared on common stock | (8,086 | ) | (2,779 | ) |
Net purchase of treasury stock | (15,805 | ) | (5,337 | ) |
Changes in additional paid-in capital | (650 | ) | (665 | ) |
Changes related to AOCI | 2,877 |
| 5,849 |
|
Adjustment related to DVA(a) | 287 |
| |
Adjustment related to AOCI(a) | | (4,939 | ) |
Changes related to other CET1 capital adjustments(b) | (656 | ) | 1,265 |
|
Change in Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital | 4,677 |
| (4,162 | ) |
Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 188,151 |
| |
Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 183,591 |
|
| | |
Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2018 | $ | 209,093 |
| |
Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 214,432 |
|
Change in CET1 capital(b) | 4,677 |
| (4,162 | ) |
Net issuance of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(b) | 925 |
| 3,070 |
|
Other | 136 |
| 66 |
|
Change in Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital | 5,738 |
| (1,026 | ) |
Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 214,831 |
| |
Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 213,406 |
|
| | |
Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2018 | $ | 28,418 |
| |
Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 28,157 |
|
Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 | 373 |
| 1,531 |
|
Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses | (101 | ) | |
Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b) | | 4,434 |
|
Other | (21 | ) | 13 |
|
Change in Standardized Tier 2 capital | 251 |
| 5,978 |
|
Standardized Tier 2 capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 28,669 |
| |
Standardized Total capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 243,500 |
| |
Standardized Tier 2 capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 34,135 |
|
Standardized Total capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 247,541 |
|
| | |
Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2018 | $ | 18,342 |
| |
Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 17,680 |
|
Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 | 373 |
| 1,531 |
|
Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses | (322 | ) | |
Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b) | | 1,804 |
|
Other | (21 | ) | 13 |
|
Change in Advanced Tier 2 capital | 30 |
| 3,348 |
|
Advanced Tier 2 capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 18,372 |
| |
Advanced Total capital at September 30, 2019 | $ | 233,203 |
| |
Advanced Tier 2 capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 21,028 |
|
Advanced Total capital at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 234,434 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes cash flow hedges and DVA related to structured notes recorded in AOCI. |
| |
(b) | Includes the net effectimpact of $2.25 billion and $1.85 billion of non-cumulative preferred stock issued on July 31, 2019 and January 24, 2019, respectively, and redemptions of non-cumulative preferred stock of $925 million and $880 million on March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019, respectively, as well as $1.37 billion of non-cumulative preferred stock that was called for partial redemption on September 26, 2019 and subsequently redeemed on October 30, 2019.the CECL capital transition provisions. |
RWA rollforward
The following table presents changes in the components of RWA under Basel III Standardized and Advanced approaches for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The amounts in the rollforward categories are estimates, based on the predominant driver of the change.
| | | Standardized | | Advanced | | Standardized | | Advanced | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Credit risk RWA | Market risk RWA | Total RWA | | Credit risk RWA | Market risk RWA | Operational risk RWA | Total RWA | |
December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,423,053 |
| $ | 105,863 |
| $ | 1,528,916 |
| | $ | 926,647 |
| $ | 105,976 |
| $ | 388,582 |
| $ | 1,421,205 |
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Credit risk RWA | Market risk RWA | Total RWA | | Credit risk RWA | Market risk RWA | Operational risk RWA | Total RWA |
December 31, 2019 | | $ | 1,440,220 |
| $ | 75,649 |
| $ | 1,515,869 |
| | $ | 932,948 |
| $ | 75,652 |
| $ | 389,278 |
| $ | 1,397,878 |
|
Model & data changes(a) | (3,406 | ) | (17,076 | ) | (20,482 | ) | | (4,542 | ) | (17,076 | ) | — |
| (21,618 | ) | 1,800 |
| (8,200 | ) | (6,400 | ) | | 1,600 |
| (8,200 | ) | — |
| (6,600 | ) |
Portfolio runoff(b) | (4,400 | ) | — |
| (4,400 | ) | | (4,300 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,300 | ) | (1,300 | ) | — |
| (1,300 | ) | | (1,300 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,300 | ) |
Movement in portfolio levels(c) | 24,711 |
| (983 | ) | 23,728 |
| | 44,408 |
| (1,136 | ) | (2,866 | ) | 40,406 |
| 58,238 |
| 32,421 |
| 90,659 |
| | 65,535 |
| 32,424 |
| 1,197 |
| 99,156 |
|
Changes in RWA | 16,905 |
| (18,059 | ) | (1,154 | ) | | 35,566 |
| (18,212 | ) | (2,866 | ) | 14,488 |
| 58,738 |
| 24,221 |
| 82,959 |
| | 65,835 |
| 24,224 |
| 1,197 |
| 91,256 |
|
September 30, 2019 | $ | 1,439,958 |
| $ | 87,804 |
| $ | 1,527,762 |
| | $ | 962,213 |
| $ | 87,764 |
| $ | 385,716 |
| $ | 1,435,693 |
| |
March 31, 2020 | | $ | 1,498,958 |
| $ | 99,870 |
| $ | 1,598,828 |
| | $ | 998,783 |
| $ | 99,876 |
| $ | 390,475 |
| $ | 1,489,134 |
|
| |
(a) | Model & data changes refer to material movements in levels of RWA as a result of revised methodologies and/or treatment per regulatory guidance (exclusive of rule changes). |
| |
(b) | Portfolio runoff for credit risk RWA primarily reflects reduced risk from position rolloffs in legacy portfolios in Home Lending. |
| |
(c) | Movement in portfolio levels (inclusive of rule changes) refers to: changes in book size, composition, credit quality, and market movements for credit risk RWA; changes in position and market movements for market risk RWA; and updates to cumulative losses for operational risk RWA.RWA; and deductions to credit risk RWA for excess eligible credit reserves not eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital. |
Supplementary leverage ratio
Refer to Capital Risk ManagementSupplementary Leverage Ratio on page 88pages 87-88 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.
The following table presents the components of the Firm’s SLR as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.SLR.
| | (in millions, except ratio) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Tier 1 capital | $ | 214,831 |
| $ | 209,093 |
| $ | 213,406 |
| $ | 214,432 |
|
Total average assets | 2,765,052 |
| 2,636,505 |
| 2,890,232 |
| 2,777,270 |
|
Less: Adjustments for deductions from Tier 1 capital | 47,200 |
| 46,618 |
| |
Less: Regulatory capital adjustments(a) | | 47,988 |
| 47,031 |
|
Total adjusted average assets(a) | 2,717,852 |
| 2,589,887 |
| 2,842,244 |
| 2,730,239 |
|
Off-balance sheet exposures(b) | 686,683 |
| 680,101 |
| |
Add: Off-balance sheet exposures(b) | | 693,578 |
| 693,192 |
|
Total leverage exposure | $ | 3,404,535 |
| $ | 3,269,988 |
| $ | 3,535,822 |
| $ | 3,423,431 |
|
SLR | 6.3 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.3 | % |
| |
(a) | Adjusted average assets, forFor purposes of calculating the SLR, includes total quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill and other intangible assets. As of March 31, 2020, includes adjustments for the CECL capital transition provisions and the exclusion of assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided under the MMLF.
|
| |
(b) | Off-balance sheet exposures are calculated as the average of the three month-end spot balances during the reporting quarter. |
Refer to Note 2122 for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s SLR ratios.
Line of business equity
Each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. Effective January 1, 2019,Refer to line of business capital allocations have increased due to a combination of changes in the relative weights, with greater emphasisequity on Standardized RWA and stress, a higher capitalization rate, updated stress simulations, and general business growth. Refer to page 9190 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.information on capital allocation.
The following table representspresents the capital allocated to each business segment:
| |
(in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Consumer & Community Banking | $ | 52.0 |
| | $ | 51.0 |
| $ | 52.0 |
| | $ | 52.0 |
|
Corporate & Investment Bank | 80.0 |
| | 70.0 |
| 80.0 |
| | 80.0 |
|
Commercial Banking | 22.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| 22.0 |
| | 22.0 |
|
Asset & Wealth Management | 10.5 |
| | 9.0 |
| 10.5 |
| | 10.5 |
|
Corporate | 71.5 |
| | 80.4 |
| 66.7 |
| (a) | 69.8 |
|
Total common stockholders’ equity | $ | 236.0 |
| | $ | 230.4 |
| $ | 231.2 |
| | $ | 234.3 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes the $2.7 billion (after-tax) impact to retained earnings upon the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020. |
Planning and stress testing
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”)
On June 27, 2019,April 6, 2020, the Firm submitted its 2020 Capital Plan to the Federal Reserve informedunder the Federal Reserve’s 2020 CCAR process. The Firm anticipates that it did not object tothe Federal Reserve will disclose the Firm’s SCB requirement and summary information regarding the Firm’s stress test results by June 30, 2020.
Refer to Stress Capital Buffer regulatory developments on page 40 of this Form 10-Q and capital planning and stress testing on pages 85-86 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 capital plan.Form 10-K for additional information.
Capital actions
Preferred stock
Preferred stock dividends declared were $423$421 million and $1.2 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020.
On OctoberDuring the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Firm announced and priced an offering of depositary shares representing $900 million of 4.75% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series GG. This issuance is expected to close on November 7, 2019. On November 1, 2019, the Firm announced that it will redeem all $900 million of its 5.45% non-cumulative preferred stock, SeriesP on December 1, 2019.
On October 30, 2019,2020, the Firm redeemed $1.37 billionand issued several series of its Series I fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock.
On September 1, 2019, the Firm redeemed all $880 million of its 6.30% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series W.
On July 31, 2019, the Firm issued $2.25 billion of fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series FF.
stock. Refer to Note 1718 of this Form 10-Q and Note 2021 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on the Firm’s preferred stock.stock, including issuances and redemptions.
Common stock dividends
On September 17, 2019, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had declared aThe Firm’s quarterly common stock dividend which increased tois currently $0.90 per share, from $0.80 per share effective with the dividend paid on October 31, 2019.share. The Firm’s dividends are subject to the Board of Directors’ approval on a quarterly basis.
Common equity
The Firm’s Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $29.4 billion of gross common equity between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 as part of the Firm’s annual capital plan.
On March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm temporarily suspended through the second quarter of 2020 repurchases of its common equity. The decision to suspend these repurchases is consistent with the Firm’s objective to use its capital and liquidity to provide support to individuals, small businesses, and the broader economy through lending and other services.
The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common equity on a settlement-date basis, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, |
| Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Total shares of common stock repurchased | 62.0 |
| 39.3 |
|
| 159.0 |
| 126.0 |
|
Aggregate common stock repurchases | $ | 6,949 |
| $ | 4,416 |
|
| $ | 17,250 |
| $ | 14,055 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Total number of shares of common stock repurchased | 50.0 |
| 49.5 |
|
Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases | $ | 6,397 |
| $ | 5,091 |
|
Refer to Part II, Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds and Part II, Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on pages 176-177181-182 of this Form 10-Q and page 30 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K, respectively, for additional information regarding repurchases of the Firm’s equity securities.
Other capital requirements
TLACTotal Loss-Absorbing Capacity (“TLAC”)
The Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the top-tier U.S. GSIBglobal systemically important bank (“GSIB”) top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible LTD effective January 1, 2019.long-term debt (“eligible LTD”).
Refer to other capital requirements on page 9391 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.information on TLAC.
The following table presents the TLAC and external long-term debt minimum requirements including applicable regulatory buffers, as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
|
| | |
| Minimum Requirements |
TLAC to RWA | 23.0 | % |
TLAC to leverage exposure | 9.5 |
|
External long-term debt to RWA | 9.5 |
|
External long-term debt to leverage | 4.5 |
|
The following table presents the eligible external TLAC and eligible LTD amounts, as well as a representation of the amounts as a percentage of the Firm’s total RWA and total leverage exposure.exposure applying the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions as of March 31, 2020.
| | September 30, 2019 | | |
| | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 |
(in billions, except ratio) | Eligible external TLAC(a) | Eligible LTD | Eligible external TLAC | Eligible LTD | Eligible external TLAC | Eligible LTD |
Total eligible TLAC & LTD | $ | 387.8 |
| $ | 159.9 |
| $ | 387.4 |
| $ | 165.0 |
| $ | 386.4 |
| $ | 161.8 |
|
% of RWA | 25.4 | % | 10.5 | % | 24.2 | % | 10.3 | % | 25.5 | % | 10.7 | % |
Minimum requirement | 23.0 |
| 9.5 |
| |
Surplus/(shortfall) | $ | 36.4 |
| $ | 14.8 |
| $ | 19.6 |
| $ | 13.1 |
| $ | 37.7 |
| $ | 17.8 |
|
| | |
% of total leverage exposure | 11.4 | % | 4.7 | % | 11.0 | % | 4.7 | % | 11.3 | % | 4.7 | % |
Minimum requirement | 9.5 |
| 4.5 |
| |
Surplus/(shortfall) | $ | 64.3 |
| $ | 6.7 |
| $ | 51.5 |
| $ | 5.9 |
| $ | 61.2 |
| $ | 7.8 |
|
| |
(a) | As of September 30, 2019, total eligible external TLAC reflects the issuance of $2.25 billion of Series FF non-cumulative preferred stock, redemption of $880 million of Series W non-cumulative preferred stock, and redemption of $1.37 billion of Series I non-cumulative preferred stock called for partial redemption on September 26, 2019 and subsequently redeemed on October 30, 2019. |
Refer to Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 7-286–28 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for information on the financial consequences to holders of the Firm’s debt and equity securities in a resolution scenario.
Broker-dealer regulatory capital
J.P. Morgan Securities
JPMorgan Chase’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities. J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Net Capital Rule”). J.P. Morgan Securities is also registered as a futures commission merchant and subject to Rule 1.17the Rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”).
Refer to Capital risk management on pages 85-9485–92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion on J.P. Morgan Securities’ capital requirements.
The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities’ net capital:
| | September 30, 2019 | | |
March 31, 2020 | | |
(in millions) | Actual |
| Minimum |
| Actual(a) |
| Minimum |
|
Net Capital | $ | 22,068 |
| $ | 3,746 |
| $ | 17,288 |
| $ | 5,945 |
|
| |
(a) | Net capital reflects the exclusion of assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided under the MMLF. |
J.P. Morgan Securities plc
J.P. Morgan Securities plc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and broker-dealer activities. J.P. Morgan Securities plc is jointly regulated by the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).
Refer to Capital risk management on pages 85-9485–92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion on J.P. Morgan Securities plc.
Effective January 1, 2019, theThe Bank of England requires, on a transitional basis, that U.K. banks, including U.K. regulated subsidiaries of overseas groups, maintain a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (“MREL”). As of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, J.P. Morgan Securities plc was compliant with the requirements of the MREL rule. Refer to Supervision and Regulation on pages 1-61–6 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on MREL.
The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities plc’s capital metrics: | | September 30, 2019 | | | |
March 31, 2020 | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Estimated |
| Minimum ratios |
| Estimated |
| Minimum ratios |
|
Total capital | $ | 55,614 |
| | $ | 53,654 |
| |
CET1 ratio | 16.9 | % | 4.5 | % | 16.6 | % | 4.5 | % |
Total capital ratio | 21.5 | % | 8.0 | % | 21.3 | % | 8.0 | % |
|
| | | | |
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT |
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Firm will be unable to meet its contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise or that it does not have the appropriate amount, composition and tenor of funding and liquidity to support its assets and liabilities. Refer to pages 95–10093–98 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K and the Firm’s USU.S. LCR Disclosure reports, which are available on the Firm’s website for a further discussion of the Firm’s Liquidity Risk Management.
LCR and HQLA
The LCR rule requires that the Firm to maintain an amount of unencumbered HQLAHigh Quality Liquid Assets (“HQLA”) that is sufficient to meet its estimated total net cash outflows over a prospective 30 calendar-day period of significant stress. HQLA is the amount of liquid assets that qualify for inclusion in the LCR. HQLA primarily consist of unencumbered cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule. The LCR is required to be a minimum of 100%.
Under the LCR rule, the amount of HQLA held by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that is in excess of its standalonestand-alone 100% minimum LCR requirement, and that is not transferable to non-bank affiliates, must be excluded from the Firm’s reported HQLA. The LCR is required to be a minimum of 100%. For additional information on HQLA and net cash outflows, refer to page 94 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K and the Firm’s U.S. LCR Disclosure reports.
The following table summarizes the Firm’s average LCR for the three months ended September 30, 2019, June 30,March 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 based on the Firm’s interpretation of the finalized LCR framework.
| | | Three months ended | Three months ended |
Average amount (in millions) | September 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | September 30, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | March 31, 2019 |
HQLA | | |
Eligible cash(a) | $ | 199,757 |
| $ | 219,838 |
| $ | 344,660 |
| $ | 205,027 |
| $ | 203,296 |
| $ | 216,787 |
|
Eligible securities(b)(c) | 337,704 |
| 317,439 |
| 190,349 |
| 343,124 |
| 341,990 |
| 303,249 |
|
Total HQLA(d) | $ | 537,461 |
| $ | 537,277 |
| $ | 535,009 |
| $ | 548,151 |
| $ | 545,286 |
| $ | 520,036 |
|
Net cash outflows | $ | 468,452 |
| $ | 477,442 |
| $ | 466,803 |
| $ | 482,372 |
| $ | 469,402 |
| $ | 467,329 |
|
LCR | 115 | % | 113 | % | 115 | % | 114 | % | 116 | % | 111 | % |
Net excess HQLA(d) | $ | 69,009 |
| $ | 59,835 |
| $ | 68,206 |
| $ | 65,779 |
| $ | 75,884 |
| $ | 52,707 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents cash on deposit at central banks, primarily the Federal Reserve Banks. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly U.S. Treasuries, U.S. GSE and U.S. government agency MBS, and sovereign bonds net of applicable haircuts under the LCR rules.rule. |
| |
(c) | HQLA eligible securities may be reported in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, trading assets, or investment securities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(d) | Excludes average excess HQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. |
The Firm’s average LCR decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared with the three-month period ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to an increase in CIB market activities and long-term debt maturities. Liquidity in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. increased during the quarter primarily due to deposits net of loan growth. Deposits increased in March as a result of market conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, effective March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced reserve requirements to zero percent, which increased JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.’s HQLA by approximately $25 billion. However, these increases in excess liquidity in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are excluded from the Firm’s reported LCR under the LCR rule. Refer to Note 21 for additional information.
The Firm’sFirm's average LCR increased during the three months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, compared with the three-monthprior year period, ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to a declinefrom an increase in the netaverage amount of reportable HQLA as a result of increased cash outflows from CIB activities.unsecured long-term debt issuances.
The Firm’s average LCR fluctuates from period to period, due to changes in its HQLA and estimated net cash outflows as a result of ongoing business activity.
Other liquidity sources
As of September 30, 2019, inIn addition to the assets reported in the Firm’s HQLA above, the Firm had approximately $312 billion of unencumbered marketable securities, such as equity securities and fixed income debt securities, that the Firm believes would be available to raise liquidity. This includes HQLA-eligible securities included as part of the excess liquidityHQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates.affiliates, as described above. The fair value of these securities was approximately $432 billion and $315 billion as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, however, the amount of liquidity that could be raised would be dependent on prevailing market conditions. The fair value increased compared to December 31, 2019, due to an increase in excess HQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and an increase in CIB trading assets during the quarter.
As of September 30, 2019, theThe Firm also had approximately $313 billion of available borrowing capacity at FHLBs and the discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank and other central banks as a result of collateral pledged by the Firm to such banks.banks of approximately $317 billion and $322 billion as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. This borrowing capacity excludes the benefit of cash and securities reported in the Firm’s HQLA or other unencumbered securities that are currently pledged at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window. window and other central banks. Although available, the Firm does not view this borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window and the other central banks as a primary source of liquidity.
Funding
Sources of funds
Management believes that the Firm’s unsecured and secured funding capacity is sufficient to meet its on- and off-balance sheet obligations.
The Firm funds its global balance sheet through diverse sources of funding including stable deposits, as well as secured and unsecured funding in the capital markets. The Firm’s loan portfolio is funded with a portionmarkets and stockholders’ equity. Deposits are the primary funding source for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Additionally, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. may also access funding through short- or long-term secured borrowings, through the issuance of the Firm’s deposits, through securitizations and, with respect to a portion of the Firm’s real estate-related loans, with secured
unsecured long-term debt, or from borrowings from the FHLBs. Deposits in excess ofParent company or the amount utilized to fund loansIntermediate Holding Company (“IHC”). The Firm’s non-bank subsidiaries are primarily funded from long-term unsecured borrowings and short-term secured borrowings, primarily securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements. Excess funding is invested by Treasury and CIO in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio or deployed in cash or other short-term liquid investments based on their interest rate and liquidity risk
characteristics. Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements and trading assets-debt and equity instruments are primarily funded by the Firm’s securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, trading liabilities-debt and equity instruments, and a portion of the Firm’s long-term debt and stockholders’ equity. In addition to funding securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements and trading assets-debt and equity instruments, proceeds from the Firm’s debt and equity issuances are used to fund certain loans and other financial and non-financial assets, or may be invested in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. Refer to the discussion below for additional information relating to Deposits, Short-term funding, and Long-term funding and issuance.
Deposits
The table below summarizes, by line of business,LOB, the deposit balances as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, and the average deposit balances for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively.
| | | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| | Three months ended March 31, |
Deposits | | Average | | Average | | Average |
(in millions) | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Consumer & Community Banking | $ | 701,170 |
| $ | 678,854 |
| | $ | 693,980 |
| $ | 674,211 |
| | $ | 688,676 |
| $ | 669,244 |
| $ | 775,068 |
| $ | 718,354 |
| (a) | | $ | 733,648 |
| $ | 681,013 |
|
Corporate & Investment Bank | 510,403 |
| 482,084 |
| | 524,521 |
| 476,995 |
| | 509,775 |
| 472,879 |
| 667,622 |
| 511,905 |
| (a) | | 562,226 |
| 492,354 |
|
Commercial Banking | 174,903 |
| 170,859 |
| | 172,653 |
| 168,102 |
| | 169,361 |
| 171,403 |
| 224,198 |
| 184,115 |
| | 188,683 |
| 167,177 |
|
Asset & Wealth Management | 138,439 |
| 138,546 |
| | 138,822 |
| 133,021 |
| | 139,127 |
| 138,885 |
| 168,561 |
| 147,804 |
| | 150,631 |
| 138,235 |
|
Corporate | 346 |
| 323 |
| | 904 |
| 533 |
| | 887 |
| 736 |
| 560 |
| 253 |
| | 998 |
| 963 |
|
Total Firm | $ | 1,525,261 |
| $ | 1,470,666 |
| | $ | 1,530,880 |
| $ | 1,452,862 |
| | $ | 1,507,826 |
| $ | 1,453,147 |
| $ | 1,836,009 |
| $ | 1,562,431 |
| | $ | 1,636,186 |
| $ | 1,479,742 |
|
| |
(a) | In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB as part of the Firm’s Wholesale Payments business. The prior- period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
Deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce the Firm’s reliance on the wholesale funding markets. A significant portion of the Firm’s deposits are consumer deposits and wholesale operating deposits, which are both considered to be stable sources of liquidity. Wholesale operating deposits are considered to be stable sources of liquidity because they are generated from customers that maintain operating service relationships with the Firm.
The table below shows the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposits ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities, as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions except ratios) | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Deposits | $ | 1,836.0 |
| | $ | 1,562.4 |
|
Deposits as a % of total liabilities | 64 | % | | 64 | % |
Loans | $ | 1,015.4 |
| | $ | 959.8 |
|
Loans-to-deposits ratio | 55 | % | | 61 | % |
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions except ratios) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
Deposits | $ | 1,525.3 |
| | $ | 1,470.7 |
|
Deposits as a % of total liabilities | 61 | % | | 62 | % |
Loans | $ | 945.2 |
| | $ | 984.6 |
|
Loans-to-deposits ratio | 62 | % | | 67 | % |
The Firm believes that average deposit balances are generally more representative of deposit trends than period-end deposit balances.balances, over time. However, during periods of market disruption those trends could be affected.
Average deposits across the Firm increased for the three months ended September 30, 2019.
The increase inMarch 31, 2020. CIB reflects an increase in operating deposits predominantly in Treasury Servicesincreased largely driven by
continued growth in client activity, and an increase in the net issuances of structured notes in Markets. The increase in CCB was driven by growth in new accounts. The increase in AWM wasactivity. CB deposits increased predominantly driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits on new client activity. The increase in CB was primarily driven by growth from existing clients.
Averagedeposits. AWM deposits increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 in CIB and CCB, partially offset by a decline in CB. Balances in AWM were relatively flat.
The increase in CIB reflects an increase in operating deposits predominantly in Treasury Serviceslargely driven by growth in client activity,time deposits. Average balances for CIB, CB and an increaseAWM were also impacted by net inflows in the net issuancesmonth of structured notes in Markets. The increase inMarch as a result of market conditions driven by COVID-19 pandemic concerns. CCB wasdeposits increased driven by continued growth in new accounts.
The decrease in CB was primarily driven by lower non operating deposits.
AWM balances were relatively flat with growth in interest-bearing deposits offset by migration predominantly into the Firm’s investment-related products.
Refer to the discussion of the Firm’s Business Segment Results and the Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 21–4337 and pages 15-16, respectively, for further information on deposit and liability balance trends.
The following table summarizes short-term and long-term funding, excluding deposits, as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, and average balances for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. Refer to the Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 15–1715-16 and Note 1011 for additional information.
| | | September 30, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | | Three months ended March 31, |
Sources of funds (excluding deposits) | Average | | Average | Average |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Commercial paper | $ | 19,620 |
| $ | 30,059 |
| | $ | 19,607 |
| $ | 28,702 |
| | $ | 24,756 |
| $ | 27,289 |
| $ | 13,770 |
| $ | 14,754 |
| | $ | 13,974 |
| $ | 28,731 |
|
Other borrowed funds | 8,826 |
| 8,789 |
| | 10,537 |
| 11,172 |
| | 10,869 |
| 11,716 |
| 8,774 |
| 7,544 |
| | 9,093 |
| 10,247 |
|
Total short-term unsecured funding | $ | 28,446 |
| $ | 38,848 |
| | $ | 30,144 |
| $ | 39,874 |
| | $ | 35,625 |
| $ | 39,005 |
| $ | 22,544 |
| $ | 22,298 |
| | $ | 23,067 |
| $ | 38,978 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(a) | $ | 235,968 |
| $ | 171,975 |
| | $ | 229,581 |
| $ | 174,436 |
| | $ | 215,148 |
| $ | 178,929 |
| $ | 223,913 |
| $ | 175,709 |
| | $ | 234,394 |
| $ | 197,454 |
|
Securities loaned(a) | 9,739 |
| 9,481 |
| | 8,505 |
| 9,131 |
| | 9,117 |
| 10,900 |
| 6,677 |
| 5,983 |
| | 7,349 |
| 10,781 |
|
Other borrowed funds(b) | 20,447 |
| 30,428 |
| | 21,758 |
| 21,169 |
| | 28,343 |
| 21,336 |
| 29,365 |
| 18,622 |
| | 19,761 |
| 35,583 |
|
Obligations of Firm-administered multi-seller conduits(c) | $ | 10,514 |
| $ | 4,843 |
| | $ | 12,167 |
| $ | 3,102 |
| | $ | 10,987 |
| $ | 3,070 |
| $ | 12,174 |
| $ | 9,223 |
| | $ | 9,898 |
| $ | 7,386 |
|
Total short-term secured funding | $ | 276,668 |
| $ | 216,727 |
| | $ | 272,011 |
| $ | 207,838 |
| | $ | 263,595 |
| $ | 214,235 |
| $ | 272,129 |
| $ | 209,537 |
| | $ | 271,402 |
| $ | 251,204 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Senior notes | $ | 173,550 |
| $ | 162,733 |
| | $ | 172,059 |
| $ | 154,820 |
| | $ | 167,495 |
| $ | 152,046 |
| $ | 171,939 |
| $ | 166,185 |
| | $ | 165,741 |
| $ | 162,952 |
|
Trust preferred securities | — |
| — |
| | — |
| 517 |
| | — |
| 629 |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
|
Subordinated debt | 18,043 |
| 16,743 |
| | 17,797 |
| 16,079 |
| | 17,196 |
| 16,106 |
| 19,267 |
| 17,591 |
| | 18,155 |
| 16,722 |
|
Structured notes(d) | 70,687 |
| 53,090 |
| | 69,144 |
| 50,905 |
| | 62,984 |
| 48,874 |
| 67,689 |
| 74,724 |
| | 72,848 |
| 57,395 |
|
Total long-term unsecured funding | $ | 262,280 |
| $ | 232,566 |
| | $ | 259,000 |
| $ | 222,321 |
| | $ | 247,675 |
| $ | 217,655 |
| $ | 258,895 |
| $ | 258,500 |
| | $ | 256,744 |
| $ | 237,069 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Credit card securitization(c) | $ | 6,457 |
| $ | 13,404 |
| | $ | 7,394 |
| $ | 15,052 |
| | $ | 10,802 |
| $ | 16,620 |
| $ | 6,562 |
| $ | 6,461 |
| | $ | 6,171 |
| $ | 13,409 |
|
FHLB advances | 29,642 |
| 44,455 |
| | 29,646 |
| 48,645 |
| | 35,998 |
| 54,378 |
| 36,131 |
| 28,635 |
| | 27,128 |
| 43,965 |
|
Other long-term secured funding(e) | 4,550 |
| 5,010 |
| | 4,558 |
| 5,013 |
| | 4,708 |
| 4,832 |
| 4,318 |
| 4,363 |
| | 4,408 |
| 4,891 |
|
Total long-term secured funding | $ | 40,649 |
| $ | 62,869 |
| | $ | 41,598 |
| $ | 68,710 |
| | $ | 51,508 |
| $ | 75,830 |
| $ | 47,011 |
| $ | 39,459 |
| | $ | 37,707 |
| $ | 62,265 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock(f) | $ | 28,363 |
| $ | 26,068 |
| | $ | 28,241 |
| $ | 26,252 |
| | $ | 27,457 |
| $ | 26,130 |
| $ | 30,063 |
| $ | 26,993 |
| | $ | 29,406 |
| $ | 27,126 |
|
Common stockholders’ equity(f) | $ | 235,985 |
| $ | 230,447 |
| | $ | 235,613 |
| $ | 230,439 |
| | $ | 232,917 |
| $ | 228,995 |
| $ | 231,199 |
| $ | 234,337 |
| | $ | 234,530 |
| $ | 230,051 |
|
| |
(a) | Primarily consists of short-term securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase. |
| |
(b) | Includes FHLBAt March 31, 2020 includes nonrecourse advances with original maturities of less than one year of $2.6 billion and $11.4 billion as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.provided under the MMLF. |
| |
(c) | Included in beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(d) | Includes certain TLAC-eligible long-term unsecured debt issued by the Parent Company. |
| |
(e) | Includes long-term structured notes which are secured. |
| |
(f) | Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 45–49,39–44 and Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 83 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 2021 and Note 2122 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on preferred stock and common stockholders’ equity. |
Short-term funding
The Firm’s sources of short-term secured funding primarily consist of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase. These instruments are secured predominantly by high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, and constitute a significant portion of the federal funds purchased and securitiesMBS. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase agreements on the Consolidated balance sheets. The increaseincreased at September 30,March 31, 2020, compared with December 31, 2019, from December 31, 2018, was driven by CIBclient-driven market-making activities as a result of changes in market conditions in March and includes the Firm’s participation in the Federal Reserve’s open market operations, as well as higher secured financing of trading assets-debt instruments
and client-driven activities. when compared with lower levels at year-end in CIB.
The balances associated with securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase fluctuate over time due to customers’ investment and financing activities, the Firm’s demand for financing, the ongoing management of the mix of the Firm’s liabilities, including its secured and unsecured financing (for both the investment securities and market-making portfolios), and other market and portfolio factors.
As of March 31, 2020, the Firm has participated in several of the U.S. government facilities, including the MMLF. The secured nonrecourse advances under the MMLF are included
in other borrowed funds. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 39-44 for additional information on the MMLF.
In addition, the Firm is participating in the PDCF established by the Federal Reserve on March 20, 2020, which allows primary dealers to support smooth market functioning by facilitating the availability of credit to businesses and households. Under the PDCF, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) provides collateralized financing on a term basis to primary dealers. At March 31, 2020, these financing transactions were reported as securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The PDCF will remain available to primary dealers for at least six months, or longer if conditions warrant.
The Firm also continues to participate in the Federal Reserve’s open market operations.
The Firm’s sources of short-term unsecured funding primarily consist of issuance of wholesale commercial paper. The decrease in commercial paper at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, from December 31, 2018,2019, was due to lower net issuance primarily for short-term liquidity management.
Long-term funding and issuance
Long-term funding provides additional sources of stable funding and liquidity for the Firm. The Firm’s long-term funding plan is driven primarily by expected client activity, liquidity considerations, and regulatory requirements, including TLAC. Long-term funding objectives include maintaining diversification, maximizing market access and optimizing funding costs. The Firm evaluates various funding markets, tenors and currencies in creating its optimal long-term funding plan.
The significant majority of the Firm’s long-term unsecured funding is issued by the Parent Company to provide maximum flexibility in support of both bank and nonbanknon-bank subsidiary funding needs. The Parent Company advances substantially all net funding proceeds to its subsidiary, the Intermediate Holding Company (“IHC”).IHC. The IHC does not issue debt to external counterparties. The following table summarizes long-term unsecured issuance and maturities or redemptions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 95-10093–98 and Note 1920 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on the IHC and long-term debt.
| | Long-term unsecured funding | Long-term unsecured funding | | | | | | | | Long-term unsecured funding | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
(Notional in millions) | Parent Company | | Subsidiaries | Parent Company | Subsidiaries |
Issuance | | | | | | | | |
Senior notes issued in the U.S. market | $ | 5,000 |
| $ | 6,000 |
| | $ | 13,250 |
| $ | 17,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,250 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
| $ | 8,761 |
| $ | 5,250 |
| $ | 4,250 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,750 |
|
Senior notes issued in non-U.S. markets | 1,672 |
| — |
| | 3,920 |
| 1,175 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 1,355 |
| 2,248 |
| — |
| — |
|
Total senior notes | 6,672 |
| 6,000 |
| | 17,170 |
| 18,175 |
| | — |
| 1,250 |
| | 1,750 |
| 8,761 |
| 6,605 |
| 6,498 |
| — |
| 1,750 |
|
Structured notes(a) | 780 |
| 387 |
| | 2,596 |
| 2,047 |
| | 8,511 |
| 5,934 |
| | 23,643 |
| 20,159 |
| 2,782 |
| 1,185 |
| 9,252 |
| 6,116 |
|
Total long-term unsecured funding – issuance | $ | 7,452 |
| $ | 6,387 |
| | $ | 19,766 |
| $ | 20,222 |
| | $ | 8,511 |
| $ | 7,184 |
| | $ | 25,393 |
| $ | 28,920 |
| $ | 9,387 |
| $ | 7,683 |
| $ | 9,252 |
| $ | 7,866 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Maturities/redemptions | | | | | | | | |
Senior notes | $ | 2,700 |
| $ | 646 |
| | $ | 10,607 |
| $ | 18,633 |
| | $ | 2,751 |
| $ | 1,503 |
| | $ | 4,567 |
| $ | 4,466 |
| $ | 5,466 |
| $ | 3,750 |
| $ | 4,065 |
| $ | 1,815 |
|
Subordinated debt | 37 |
| 15 |
| | 183 |
| 15 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| 146 |
| — |
| — |
|
Structured notes | 477 |
| 582 |
| | 1,436 |
| 2,465 |
| | 4,540 |
| 3,474 |
| | 12,700 |
| 12,104 |
| 1,525 |
| 628 |
| 9,382 |
| 3,833 |
|
Total long-term unsecured funding – maturities/redemptions | $ | 3,214 |
| $ | 1,243 |
| | $ | 12,226 |
| $ | 21,113 |
| | $ | 7,291 |
| $ | 4,977 |
| | $ | 17,267 |
| $ | 16,570 |
| $ | 6,991 |
| $ | 4,524 |
| $ | 13,447 |
| $ | 5,648 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes certain TLAC-eligible long-term unsecured debt issued by the Parent Company. |
The Firm raisescan also raise secured long-term funding through securitization of consumer credit card loans and advances from the FHLBs.FHLB advances. The following table summarizes the securitization issuance and FHLB advances and their respective maturities or redemptions for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term secured funding | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| Issuance | | Maturities/Redemptions |
(in millions) | 2020 | 2019 | | 2020 | 2019 |
Credit card securitization | $ | 1,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 900 |
| $ | — |
|
FHLB advances | 15,000 |
| — |
| | 7,503 |
| 2,001 |
|
Other long-term secured funding(a) | 234 |
| 35 |
| | 205 |
| 246 |
|
Total long-term secured funding | $ | 16,234 |
| $ | 35 |
| | $ | 8,608 |
| $ | 2,247 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term secured funding | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
| Issuance | | Maturities/Redemptions | | Issuance | | Maturities/Redemptions |
(in millions) | 2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Credit card securitization | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2,850 |
| $ | 2,375 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,396 |
| | $ | 6,975 |
| $ | 8,500 |
|
FHLB advances | — |
| — |
| | 5 |
| 10,704 |
| | — |
| 4,000 |
| | 14,810 |
| 23,157 |
|
Other long-term secured funding(a) | 62 |
| 117 |
| | 180 |
| 139 |
| | 115 |
| 312 |
| | 633 |
| 161 |
|
Total long-term secured funding | $ | 62 |
| $ | 117 |
| | $ | 3,035 |
| $ | 13,218 |
| | $ | 115 |
| $ | 5,708 |
| | $ | 22,418 |
| $ | 31,818 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes long-term structured notes which are secured. |
The Firm’s wholesale businesses also securitize loans for client-driven transactions; those client-driven loan securitizations are not considered to be a source of funding for the Firm and are not included in the table above. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further description of the client-driven loan securitizations.
Credit ratings
The cost and availability of financing are influenced by credit ratings. Reductions in these ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firm’s access to liquidity sources, increase the cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Firm. The nature and magnitude of the impact of ratings downgrades depends on numerous contractual and behavioral factors, which the Firm believes are incorporated in its liquidity risk and stress testing metrics. The Firm believes that it
maintains sufficient liquidity to withstand a potential decrease in funding capacity due to ratings downgrades.
Additionally, the Firm’s funding requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments may be adversely affected by a decline in credit ratings. Refer to SPEs on page 18, and liquidity risk and credit-related contingent features in Note 45 for additional information on the impact of a credit ratings downgrade on the funding requirements for VIEs, and on derivatives and collateral agreements.
The credit ratings of the Parent Company and the Firm’s principal bank and non-bank subsidiaries as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, except as noted below, were as follows.follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(a) | | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC J.P. Morgan Securities plc |
September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 | Long-term issuer | Short-term issuer | Outlook | | Long-term issuer | Short-term issuer | Outlook | | Long-term issuer | Short-term issuer | Outlook |
Moody’s Investors Service | A2 | P-1 | Stable | | Aa2 | P-1 | Stable | | Aa3 | P-1 | Stable |
Standard & Poor’s | A- | A-2 | Stable | | A+ | A-1 | Stable | | A+ | A-1 | Stable |
Fitch Ratings(a) | AA- | F1+ | StableNegative | | AA | F1+ | StableNegative | | AA | F1+ | StableNegative |
| |
(a) | On May 18, 2019, the Firm merged Chase Bank USA, N.A. with and into JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the surviving bank. The credit rating for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. reflects the credit rating of the merged entity. |
(a) On April 18, 2020, Fitch affirmed the credit ratings of the Parent Company and the Firm’s principal bank and non-bank subsidiaries but revised the outlook on the credit ratings from stable to negative given expectations that credit fundamentals will deteriorate as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Refer to page 10098 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the factors that could affect credit ratings of the Parent Company and the Firm’s principal bank and non-bank subsidiaries.
|
| | | | |
CREDIT AND INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT |
Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk,
wholesale credit risk, and investment portfolio risk. Refer to pages 55-6850–65 for a further discussion of Credit Risk.
Refer to page 6966 for a further discussion of Investment Portfolio Risk. Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 102-123100–118 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the Firm’s Credit and Investment Risk Management framework and organization, and the identification, monitoring and management.framework.
Credit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer.
In the following tables, reported loans include loans retained (i.e., held-for-investment); loans held-for-sale; and certain loans accounted for at fair value. The following tables do not include loans which the Firm accounts for at fair value and classifies as trading assets; refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further information regarding these loans. Refer to Notes 11, 22,12, 23, and 45 for additional information on the Firm’s loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables, including the Firm’s accounting policies.
Refer to Wholesale credit exposure – industry exposures on pages 62–64 for further information regarding the credit risk inherent in the Firm’s cash placed with banks; refer to Note 9 of this Form 10-Q and Note 10 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for information regarding the credit risk inherent in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio; and refer to Note 10 of this Form 10-Q and Note 11 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for information regarding the credit risk inherent in the securities financing portfolio.
Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 106–111 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K52-55 and Note 11 of this Form 10-Q12 for a further discussiondiscussions of the consumer credit environment and consumer loans. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 112–119 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K56-63 and Note 11 of this Form 10-Q for a further discussion of12 as well as the wholesale credit environment and wholesale loans.
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The adoption resulted in a change in the accounting for PCI loans, which are considered PCD loans under CECL. In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total credit portfolio | | | | |
| Credit exposure | | Nonperforming(d)(e) |
(in millions) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Loans retained | $ | 928,887 |
| $ | 969,415 |
| | $ | 4,687 |
| $ | 4,611 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | 10,571 |
| 11,988 |
| | 88 |
| — |
|
Loans at fair value | 5,760 |
| 3,151 |
| | 176 |
| 220 |
|
Total loans–reported | 945,218 |
| 984,554 |
| | 4,951 |
| 4,831 |
|
Derivative receivables | 55,577 |
| 54,213 |
| | 26 |
| 60 |
|
Receivables from customers and other(a) | 32,236 |
| 30,217 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Total credit-related assets | 1,033,031 |
| 1,068,984 |
| | 4,977 |
| 4,891 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | | | | | |
Real estate owned | NA |
| NA |
| | 340 |
| 269 |
|
Other | NA |
| NA |
| | 26 |
| 30 |
|
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions | NA |
| NA |
| | 366 |
| 299 |
|
Lending-related commitments | 1,095,090 |
| 1,039,258 |
| | 446 |
| 469 |
|
Total credit portfolio | $ | 2,128,121 |
| $ | 2,108,242 |
| | $ | 5,789 |
| $ | 5,659 |
|
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities(b) | $ | (15,031 | ) | $ | (12,682 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(c) | (15,482 | ) | (15,322 | ) | | NA |
| NA |
|
On April 7, 2020, the federal banking agencies along with the National Credit Union Administration and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in consultation with the state
financial regulators, issued an interagency statement revising a March 22, 2020 interagency statement on loan modifications and the reporting for financial institutions working with customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (the “IA Statement”). The IA Statement reconfirmed that supervised institutions will not be directed to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), including short-term and other insignificant modifications such as payment delays, fee waivers and extensions of repayment terms, and modifications or other programs mandated by the federal or state governments. The IA Statement also provides that loans that were current prior to these modifications should generally not be reported as past due or nonaccrual. Additionally, the IA Statement outlines accounting and reporting considerations for eligible loan modifications for which a financial institution elects to apply the CARES Act and forgo TDR accounting.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Net charge-offs | $ | 1,371 |
| $ | 1,033 |
| | $ | 4,135 |
| $ | 3,620 |
|
Average retained loans | | | | | |
Loans | 932,493 |
| 942,583 |
| | 944,666 |
| 931,766 |
|
Loans – reported, excluding residential real estate PCI loans | 910,753 |
| 916,205 |
| | 921,978 |
| 903,377 |
|
Net charge-off rates | | | | | |
Loans | 0.58 | % | 0.43 | % | | 0.59 | % | 0.52 | % |
Loans – excluding PCI | 0.60 |
| 0.45 |
| | 0.60 |
| 0.54 |
|
The Firm’s initial response to many borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic included offering loan modifications, such as 90-day payment delays and waiving or refunding certain fees. These modifications are intended to mitigate adverse affects on borrowers due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instances of these modifications will likely rise over the course of the second quarter of 2020. The effectiveness of the Firm’s actions in helping borrowers recover and mitigating credit losses remains uncertain in light of the unpredictable nature and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the Firm’s initial short-term payment delays and other insignificant modifications was not material to the performance of and credit-related information for the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios during the quarter ended March 31, 2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total credit portfolio | | | | |
| Credit exposure | | Nonperforming(d)(e) |
(in millions) | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Loans retained | $ | 1,003,089 |
| $ | 945,601 |
| | $ | 5,834 |
| $ | 3,983 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | 6,072 |
| 7,064 |
| | 48 |
| 7 |
|
Loans at fair value | 6,214 |
| 7,104 |
| | 90 |
| 90 |
|
Total loans–reported | 1,015,375 |
| 959,769 |
| | 5,972 |
| 4,080 |
|
Derivative receivables | 81,648 |
| 49,766 |
| | 85 |
| 30 |
|
Receivables from customers and other(a) | 33,376 |
| 33,706 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Total credit-related assets | 1,130,399 |
| 1,043,241 |
| | 6,057 |
| 4,110 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | | | | | |
Real estate owned | NA |
| NA |
| | 342 |
| 344 |
|
Other | NA |
| NA |
| | 22 |
| 43 |
|
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions | NA |
| NA |
| | 364 |
| 387 |
|
Lending-related commitments | 1,081,462 |
| 1,104,199 |
| | 619 |
| 474 |
|
Total credit portfolio | $ | 2,211,861 |
| $ | 2,147,440 |
| | $ | 7,040 |
| $ | 4,971 |
|
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities(b) | $ | (20,773 | ) | $ | (18,030 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(c) | (26,178 | ) | (16,009 | ) | | NA |
| NA |
|
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended March 31, |
2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Net charge-offs | $ | 1,469 |
| $ | 1,361 |
|
Average retained loans | 948,635 |
| 956,557 |
|
Net charge-off rates | 0.62 | % | 0.58 | % |
| |
(a) | Receivables from customers and other primarily represents prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables. |
| |
(b) | Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Credit derivatives on page 6663 and Note 45 for additional information. |
| |
(c) | Includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion hasopinions have not been either sought or obtained.obtained with respect to master netting agreements. |
| |
(d) | Excludes PCI loans. The Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools is performing. |
| |
(e) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, nonperforming assets excluded mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.6 billion$616 million and $2.6 billion,$961 million, respectively, and real estate owned (“REO”) insured by U.S. government agencies of $50$29 million and $75$41 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”). |
| |
(e) | At March 31, 2020, nonperforming loans included $970 million of PCD loans on nonaccrual status. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans excluded PCI loans as the Firm recognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools was performing. |
|
| | | | |
CONSUMER CREDIT PORTFOLIO |
The Firm’s retained consumer portfolio consists primarily of residential real estate loans, credit card loans, scored auto loans, and business banking loans, as well as associated lending-related commitments. The Firm’s focus is on serving primarily the prime segment of the consumer credit market. Refer to Note 11 of this Form 10-Q and Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 106–111 and Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on consumer loans.loans, as well as the Firm’s nonaccrual and charge-off accounting policies. Refer to Note 22 of this Form 10-Q and Note 27 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K23 for further information on lending-related commitments.
Recent deterioration in the macroeconomic environment driven by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in an increase in the allowance for credit losses. As of March 31, 2020, the impacts of the macroeconomic environment have had only a limited impact to consumer credit performance. The continuation or worsening of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the macroeconomic environment could result in further impacts to credit quality metrics, including delinquencies, nonaccrual loans and charge-offs.
The following table presents consumer credit-related information with respect to the scored credit portfolioportfolios held byin CCB, scored prime mortgage and scored home equity loans held by AWM and prime mortgage loans held by Corporate. Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information about the Firm’s nonaccrual and charge-off accounting policies.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer credit portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | Credit exposure | | Nonaccrual loans(f)(g) | | Net charge-offs/(recoveries)(h) | | Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(h)(i) | | Net charge-offs/(recoveries)(h) | | Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(h)(i) |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Consumer, excluding credit card | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans, excluding PCI loans and loans held-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | $ | 197,456 |
| $ | 231,078 |
| | $ | 1,629 |
| $ | 1,765 |
| | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (105 | ) | | (0.03 | )% | (0.18 | )% | | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (256 | ) | | (0.02 | )% | (0.15 | )% |
Home equity | 24,954 |
| 28,340 |
| | 1,208 |
| 1,323 |
| | (25 | ) | (12 | ) | | (0.39 | ) | (0.16 | ) | | (40 | ) | (2 | ) | | (0.20 | ) | (0.01 | ) |
Auto(a)(b) | 61,410 |
| 63,573 |
| | 112 |
| 128 |
| | 49 |
| 56 |
| | 0.32 |
| 0.35 |
| | 149 |
| 182 |
| | 0.32 |
| 0.37 |
|
Consumer & Business Banking(b)(c) | 26,699 |
| 26,612 |
| | 268 |
| 245 |
| | 79 |
| 68 |
| | 1.18 |
| 1.02 |
| | 204 |
| 171 |
| | 1.03 |
| 0.88 |
|
Total loans, excluding PCI loans and loans held-for-sale | 310,519 |
| 349,603 |
| | 3,217 |
| 3,461 |
| | 88 |
| 7 |
| | 0.11 |
| 0.01 |
| | 282 |
| 95 |
| | 0.11 |
| 0.04 |
|
Loans – PCI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Home equity | 7,753 |
| 8,963 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Prime mortgage | 4,164 |
| 4,690 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Subprime mortgage | 1,797 |
| 1,945 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Option ARMs | 7,576 |
| 8,436 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total loans – PCI | 21,290 |
| 24,034 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total loans – retained | 331,809 |
| 373,637 |
| | 3,217 |
| 3,461 |
| | 88 |
| 7 |
| | 0.10 |
| 0.01 |
| | 282 |
| 95 |
| | 0.11 |
| 0.03 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | 4,821 |
| 95 |
| | 2 |
| — |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total consumer, excluding credit card loans | 336,630 |
| 373,732 |
| | 3,219 |
| 3,461 |
| | 88 |
| 7 |
| | 0.10 |
| 0.01 |
| | 282 |
| 95 |
| | 0.11 |
| 0.03 |
|
Lending-related commitments(d) | 53,591 |
| 46,066 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receivables from customers | 18 |
| 154 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer exposure, excluding credit card | 390,239 |
| 419,952 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit card | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans retained(e) | 159,571 |
| 156,616 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1,175 |
| 1,073 |
| | 2.95 |
| 2.91 |
| | 3,617 |
| 3,407 |
| | 3.13 |
| 3.16 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | — |
| 16 |
| | — |
| — |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total credit card loans | 159,571 |
| 156,632 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1,175 |
| 1,073 |
| | 2.95 |
| 2.91 |
| | 3,617 |
| 3,407 |
| | 3.13 |
| 3.16 |
|
Lending-related commitments(d) | 645,880 |
| 605,379 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total credit card exposure | 805,451 |
| 762,011 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer credit portfolio | $ | 1,195,690 |
| $ | 1,181,963 |
| | $ | 3,219 |
| $ | 3,461 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| $ | 1,080 |
| | 1.00 | % | 0.82 | % | | $ | 3,899 |
| $ | 3,502 |
| | 1.02 | % | 0.90 | % |
Memo: Total consumer credit portfolio, excluding PCI | $ | 1,174,400 |
| $ | 1,157,929 |
| | $ | 3,219 |
| $ | 3,461 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| $ | 1,080 |
| | 1.05 | % | 0.86 | % | | $ | 3,899 |
| $ | 3,502 |
| | 1.07 | % | 0.96 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer credit portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Three months ended March 31, | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Credit exposure | | Nonaccrual loans(g)(h) | | Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | | Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(i) | |
Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| |
Consumer, excluding credit card | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential real estate(a) | $ | 242,349 |
| $ | 243,317 |
| | $ | 3,730 |
| $ | 2,780 |
| | (120 | ) | (2 | ) | | (0.20 | ) | — |
| |
Auto and other(b)(c) | 51,430 |
| 51,682 |
| | 147 |
| 146 |
| | 114 |
| 109 |
| | 0.89 |
| 0.85 |
| |
Total loans – retained | 293,779 |
| 294,999 |
| | 3,877 |
| 2,926 |
| | (6 | ) | 107 |
| | (0.01 | ) | 0.13 |
| |
Loans held-for-sale | 1,848 |
| 3,002 |
| | — |
| 2 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| |
Total consumer, excluding credit card loans | 295,627 |
| 298,001 |
| | 3,877 |
| 2,928 |
| | (6 | ) | 107 |
| | (0.01 | ) | 0.13 |
| |
Lending-related commitments(d) | 41,535 |
| 40,169 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer exposure, excluding credit card | 337,162 |
| 338,170 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Credit card | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans retained(e) | 154,021 |
| 168,924 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1,313 |
| 1,202 |
| | 3.25 |
| 3.23 |
| |
Loans held-for-sale | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| NA |
| |
Total credit card loans | 154,021 |
| 168,924 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1,313 |
| 1,202 |
| | 3.25 |
| 3.23 |
| |
Lending-related commitments(d)(f) | 681,442 |
| 650,720 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total credit card exposure(f) | 835,463 |
| 819,644 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer credit portfolio(f) | $ | 1,172,625 |
| $ | 1,157,814 |
| | $ | 3,877 |
| $ | 2,928 |
| | $ | 1,307 |
| $ | 1,309 |
| | 1.15 | % | 1.10 | % | |
| |
(a) | Includes scored mortgage and home equity loans held in CCB and AWM, and scored mortgage loans held in Corporate. |
| |
(b) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, excluded operating lease assets of $22.1$23.1 billion and $20.5$22.8 billion, respectively. These operating lease assets are included in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 1617 for further information. |
| |
(b)(c) | Includes certainscored auto and business banking loans and auto dealer risk-rated loans that apply the wholesale methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by CCB, and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included within the consumer portfolio. |
| |
(c) | Predominantly includes Business Banking loans.overdrafts. |
| |
(d) | Credit card, and home equity and certain business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. For credit card commitments, and if certain conditions are met, home equity commitments and certain business banking commitments, the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of credit by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases as permitted by law, without notice. Refer to Note 2223 for further information. |
| |
(e) | Includes billed interest and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible interest and fees. |
| |
(f) | Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CB and CIB. |
| |
(g) | At September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, nonaccrual loans excluded mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.6 billion$616 million and $2.6 billion,$961 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from nonaccrual loans based upon the government guarantee. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status, as permitted by regulatory guidance issued by the FFIEC. |
| |
(g)(h) | ExcludesAt March 31, 2020, nonaccrual loans included $970 million of PCD loans. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans excluded PCI loans. Theloans as the Firm is recognizingrecognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools iswas performing. |
| |
(h) | Net charge-offs/(recoveries) and the net charge-off/(recovery) rates excluded write-offs in the PCI portfolio of $43 million and $58 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $132 million and $151 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. Refer to Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 67–68 for further information. |
| |
(i) | Average consumer loans held-for-sale were $5.5$2.5 billion and $196 million$1.2 billion for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $2.6 billion and $240 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating net charge-off/(recovery) rates. |
Consumer, excluding credit card
Portfolio analysis
Loan balances decreased from December 31, 20182019 due to lower residential real estate loans, predominantly driven by loan sales. The credit performance of the portfolio continues to benefit from a strong labor market and improvement in home prices.
The following discussions provide information concerning individual loan products, excluding PCI loans which are addressed separately. Refer to Note 11 of this Form 10-Q for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.
Residential mortgage:real estate: The residential mortgagereal estate portfolio, including loans held-for-sale, predominantly consists of prime mortgage loans.loans and home equity lines of credit. The portfolio decreased from December 31, 20182019 driven by paydowns and loan sales in Home Lending, as well as paydowns, largely offset by originations of prime mortgage loans that have been retained on the balance sheet. Net recoveries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 were lowerhigher when compared with the same periodsperiod in the prior year as the prior yearcurrent quarter benefited from larger recoveriesa recovery on a loan sales.sale.
The carrying value of home equity lines of credit outstanding was $27.9 billion at March 31, 2020. This amount included $10.6 billion of HELOCs that have recast from interest-only to fully amortizing payments or have been modified and $9.0 billion of interest-only balloon HELOCs, which primarily mature after 2030. The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by closing or reducing the undrawn line to the extent permitted by law when borrowers are exhibiting a material deterioration in their credit risk profile.
At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm’scarrying value of interest-only residential mortgage portfolio included $21.8loans was $22.8 billion and $21.6$22.5 billion, respectively, of interest-only loans.respectively. These loans have an interest-only payment period generally followed by an adjustable-rate or fixed-rate fully amortizing payment period to maturity and are typically originated as higher-balance loans to higher-income borrowers, predominantly in AWM. Performance of this portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was in line with the performance of the broader residential mortgage portfolio for the same period.
The following table provides a summary of the Firm’s residential mortgage portfolio insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, including loans held-for-sale. The Firm monitors its exposure to certain potential unrecoverable claim payments related to government-insured loans and considers this exposure in estimating the allowance for loan losses.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Current | $ | 2,100 |
| $ | 2,884 |
| $ | 883 |
| $ | 1,280 |
|
30-89 days past due | 1,054 |
| 1,528 |
| 402 |
| 695 |
|
90 or more days past due | 1,602 |
| 2,600 |
| 616 |
| 961 |
|
Total government guaranteed loans | $ | 4,756 |
| $ | 7,012 |
| $ | 1,901 |
| $ | 2,936 |
|
Home equity:Auto and other: The home equity portfolio declined from December 31, 2018 primarily reflecting loan paydowns.
At September 30, 2019, approximately 90% of the Firm’s home equity portfolio consisted of home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”)auto and the remainder consisted of home equity loans (“HELOANs”). The carrying value of HELOCs outstanding was $23 billion at September 30, 2019. This amount included $10 billion of HELOCs that have recast from interest-only to fully amortizing payments or have been modified and $4 billion of interest-only balloon HELOCs, which primarily mature after 2030. The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by closing or reducing the undrawn line to the extent permitted by law when borrowers are exhibiting a material deterioration in their credit risk profile.
Refer to Note 11 of this Form 10-Q and Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 106–111 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on the Firm’s home equity portfolio.
Auto: The autoother loan portfolio predominantly consists of prime-quality loans.scored auto and business banking loans, as well as overdrafts. The portfolio declinedwas relatively flat when compared with December 31, 2018,2019, as paydowns and charge-offs or liquidation of delinquent loans were predominantly offset by new originations.
Consumer & Business Banking: Consumer & Business Banking loans The scored auto portfolio net charge-off rates were flat when compared with December 31, 2018 as loan originations were offset by paydowns0.41% and charge-offs of delinquent loans. Net charge-offs0.50% for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, increased when compared with the same period in the prior year due primarily to higher deposit overdraft losses.respectively.
Purchased credit-impaired loans:PCI loans represent certain loans that were acquired and deemed to be credit-impaired on the acquisition date. PCI loans decreased from December 31, 2018 due to portfolio run off. As of September 30, 2019, approximately 9% of the option ARM PCI loans were delinquent and approximately 71% of the portfolio had been modified into fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. The borrowers for substantially all of the remaining option ARM loans are making amortizing payments, although such payments are not necessarily fully amortizing. This latter group of loans is subject to the risk of payment shock due to future payment recast. Default rates generally increase on option ARM loans when payment recast results in a payment increase. The expected increase in default rates is considered in the Firm’s quarterly impairment assessment.
The following table provides a summary of lifetime principal loss estimates included in either the nonaccretable difference or the allowance for loan losses.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Summary of PCI loans lifetime principal loss estimates |
| Lifetime loss estimates(a) | | Life-to-date liquidation losses(b) |
(in billions) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| | Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| | Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Home equity | $ | 13.9 |
| | $ | 14.1 |
| | $ | 13.0 |
| | $ | 13.0 |
|
Prime mortgage | 4.1 |
| | 4.1 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 3.9 |
|
Subprime mortgage | 3.3 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 3.2 |
|
Option ARMs | 10.3 |
| | 10.3 |
| | 10.0 |
| | 9.9 |
|
Total | $ | 31.6 |
| | $ | 31.8 |
| | $ | 30.1 |
| | $ | 30.0 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes the original nonaccretable difference established in purchase accounting of $30.5 billion for principal losses plus additional principal losses recognized subsequent to acquisition through the provision and allowance for loan losses. The remaining nonaccretable difference for principal losses was $476 million and $512 million at September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Represents both realization of loss upon loan resolution and any principal forgiven upon modification. |
Geographic composition and current estimated loan-to-value ratio of residential real estate loans
Refer to Note 1112 for information on the geographic composition of the Firm’s residential real estate loans.
Current estimated loan-to-value ratio of residential real estate loans
Average current estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios have declined consistent with recent improvements in home prices, customer paydowns, and charge-offs or liquidations of higher LTV loans. Refer to Note 11 for information on current estimated LTVs of the Firm’s residential real estate loans.
Loan modification activities forModified residential real estate loans
The performance of modified loans generally differs by product type due to differences in both the credit quality and the types of modifications provided. Performance metrics for modifications to the residential real estate portfolios as measured through redefault rates, were not materially different from December 31, 2018. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 106–111 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on the Firm’s redefault rates.
Certain modified loans have interest rate reset provisions (“step-rate modifications”) where the interest rates on these loans generally began to increase commencing in 2014 by 1% per year, and will continue to do so, until the rate reaches a specified cap. The cap on these loans is typically at a prevailing market interest rate for a fixed-rate mortgage loan as of the modification date. At September 30, 2019, the carrying value of non-PCI loans and the unpaid principal balance of PCI loans modified in step-rate modifications, which have not yet met their specified caps, were $1.3 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. The Firm continues to monitor this risk exposure and the impact of these potential interest rate increases is considered in the Firm’s allowance for loan losses.
The following table presents information as of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, relating to modified retained residential real estate loans for which concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.difficulty, which include both TDRs and modified loans accounted for as PCI loans prior to the adoption of CECL. The following table does not include loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions and, therefore, are not TDRs. Refer to Note 1112 for further information on modifications for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Modified residential real estate loans |
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
(in millions) | Retained loans | Non-accrual retained loans(d) | | Retained loans | Non-accrual retained loans(d) |
Modified residential real estate loans, excluding PCI loans(a)(b) | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | $ | 4,118 |
| $ | 1,376 |
| | $ | 4,565 |
| $ | 1,459 |
|
Home equity | 1,961 |
| 981 |
| | 2,012 |
| 955 |
|
Total modified residential real estate loans, excluding PCI loans | $ | 6,079 |
| $ | 2,357 |
| | $ | 6,577 |
| $ | 2,414 |
|
Modified PCI loans(c) | | | | | |
Home equity | $ | 2,003 |
| NA |
| | $ | 2,086 |
| NA |
|
Prime mortgage | 2,929 |
| NA |
| | 3,179 |
| NA |
|
Subprime mortgage | 1,919 |
| NA |
| | 2,041 |
| NA |
|
Option ARMs | 5,879 |
| NA |
| | 6,410 |
| NA |
|
Total modified PCI loans | $ | 12,730 |
| NA |
| | $ | 13,716 |
| NA |
|
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| |
Retained loans(a) | 16,717 |
| | 5,926 |
| |
PCI loans | NA |
| | 12,372 |
| (d) |
Nonaccrual retained loans(b)(c) | 3,040 |
| | 2,332 |
| |
| |
(a) | Amounts represent the carrying value of modified residential real estate loans. |
| |
(b) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, $162019, $11 million and $4.1 billion,$14 million, respectively, of loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Ginnie Mae in accordance with the standards of the appropriate government agency (i.e., Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“RHS”)) are not included in the table above. When such loans perform subsequent to modification in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, they are generally sold back into Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure. Refer to Note 1314 for additional information about sales of loans in securitization transactions with Ginnie Mae. |
| |
(c) | Amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of modified PCI loans. |
| |
(d)(b) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, nonaccrual loans included $1.9$2.0 billion and $2.0$1.9 billion, respectively, of troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) for which the borrowers were less than 90 days past due. Refer to Note 1112 for additional information about loans modified in a TDR that are on nonaccrual status. |
| |
(c) | At March 31, 2020, nonaccrual loans included $725 million of PCD loans. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans excluded PCI loans as the Firm recognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools was performing. |
| |
(d) | Amount represents the unpaid principal balance of modified PCI loans at December 31, 2019. |
Nonperforming assets
The following table presents information as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, about consumer, excluding credit card, nonperforming assets.
| | Nonperforming assets(a) | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans(b) | | | | | | | |
Residential real estate(b) | $ | 2,839 |
| | $ | 3,088 |
| $ | 3,730 |
| | $ | 2,782 |
| |
Other consumer | 380 |
| | 373 |
| |
Auto and other | | 147 |
| | 146 |
| |
Total nonaccrual loans | 3,219 |
| | 3,461 |
| 3,877 |
| | 2,928 |
| |
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | | | | | | | |
Real estate owned(c) | 209 |
| | 196 |
| 231 |
| | 208 |
| |
Other | 26 |
| | 30 |
| 22 |
| | 24 |
| |
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions | 235 |
| | 226 |
| 253 |
| | 232 |
| |
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 3,454 |
| | $ | 3,687 |
| $ | 4,130 |
| | $ | 3,160 |
| |
| |
(a) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, nonperforming assets excluded mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.6 billion$616 million and $2.6 billion,$961 million, respectively, and REO insured by U.S. government agencies of $50$29 million and $75$41 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. |
| |
(b) | ExcludesAt March 31, 2020, nonaccrual loans included $970 million of PCD loans. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans excluded PCI loans which are accounted for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due status of the pools, or that of individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful. The Firm is recognizingrecognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the pools iswas performing. |
| |
(c) | The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
Nonaccrual loans in the residential real estate portfolio at September 30, 2019 decreased to $2.8 billion from $3.1 billion at December 31, 2018, of which 20% and 24% were greater than 150 days past due, respectively. In the aggregate, the unpaid principal balance of residential real estate loans greater than 150 days past due was charged down by approximately 31% and 32% to the estimated net realizable value of the collateral at September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Nonaccrual loans: The following table presents changes in consumer, excluding credit card, nonaccrual loans for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
| | Nonaccrual loan activity | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Beginning balance | | $ | 3,461 |
| $ | 4,209 |
| $ | 2,928 |
| $ | 3,244 |
|
Additions | | 1,674 |
| 2,174 |
| |
| | |
Additions: | | |
PCD loans, upon adoption of CECL | | 708 |
| NA |
|
Other additions | | 784 |
| 513 |
|
Total additions | | 1,492 |
| 513 |
|
| | |
Reductions: | | | |
Principal payments and other(a) | | 766 |
| 1,119 |
| 206 |
| 203 |
|
Charge-offs | | 301 |
| 354 |
| 97 |
| 97 |
|
Returned to performing status | | 657 |
| 1,057 |
| 147 |
| 207 |
|
Foreclosures and other liquidations | | 192 |
| 217 |
| 93 |
| 70 |
|
Total reductions | | 1,916 |
| 2,747 |
| 543 |
| 577 |
|
| | |
Net changes | | (242 | ) | (573 | ) | 949 |
| (64 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | 3,219 |
| $ | 3,636 |
| $ | 3,877 |
| $ | 3,180 |
|
| |
(a) | Other reductions includes loan sales. |
Active and suspended foreclosure: Refer to Note 1112 for information on loans that were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure.
Refer to Note 12 for further information about the consumer credit portfolio, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.
Purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans
The following tables provide credit-related information for PCD loans, which were accounted for as PCI loans prior to the adoption of CECL. PCI loans are considered PCD loans under CECL and are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual and charge-off policies. PCD loans are now reported in the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio’s residential real estate class. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Loan delinquency | | |
Current | $ | 17,983 |
| $ | 18,571 |
|
30-149 days past due | 942 |
| 970 |
|
150 or more days past due | 593 |
| 822 |
|
Total retained PCD loans | 19,518 |
| 20,363 |
|
Held-for-sale PCD loans | — |
| NA |
|
Total PCD loans | $ | 19,518 |
| $ | 20,363 |
|
| | |
% of 30+ days past due to total retained PCD loans | 7.86 | % | 8.80 | % |
Nonaccrual loans | 970 |
| NA |
|
|
| | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended March 31, 2020 |
|
Net charge-offs | $ | 6 |
|
Net charge-off rate | 0.12 | % |
Credit card
Total credit card loans increaseddecreased from December 31, 2018 reflecting2019 due to seasonality and a decline in sales volume in March as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The March 31, 2020 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 1.96% and 1.02%, respectively, increased sales volumes from existing customers and new account growth, partially offset bycompared to the impact of seasonality. The September 30,December 31, 2019 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 1.84%1.87% and 0.90%0.95%, respectively were relatively flat compareddue to the December 31, 2018 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 1.83% and 0.92%, respectively.decline in credit card loans noted above. Net charge-offs increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 when compared with the same period in the prior year due to loan growth, in line with prior expectations.
Consistent with the Firm’s policy, all credit card loans typically remain on accrual status until charged off. However, the Firm establishes anFirm’s allowance which is offset against loans and reduces interest income, for loan losses includes the estimated uncollectible portion of accrued and billed interest and fee income. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies.
Geographic and FICO composition of credit card loans
Refer to Note 1112 for information on the geographic and FICO composition of the Firm’s credit card loans.
Modifications of credit card loans
At September 30, 2019both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm had $1.4$1.5 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, of credit card loans outstanding that have been modified in TDRs, which does not include loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered TDRs. Refer to Note 1112 for additional information about loan modification programs to borrowers.
|
| | | | |
WHOLESALE CREDIT PORTFOLIO |
In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through various operating services (such as cash management and clearing activities), securities financing activities and cash placed with banks. A portion of the loans originated or acquired by the Firm’s wholesale businesses is generally retained on the balance sheet. The Firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans that it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk.
The credit performance of the wholesale portfolio remained favorable for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, characterized by continued low levels of criticized exposure, nonaccrual loans and charge-offs. Refer to the industry discussion on pages 62–64 for further information. Loans held-for-sale decreased, driven by a loan syndication in CIB. The wholesale portfolio is actively managed, in part by conducting ongoing, in-depth reviews of client credit quality and transaction structure inclusive of collateral where applicable, and of industry, product and client concentrations.
Refer to the industry discussion on pages 58–61 for further information.In the following tables, theThe Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio includes exposure held in CIB, CB, AWM and Corporate. It excludes all exposure managed by CCB, scored prime mortgageCorporate as well as risk-rated business banking and scored home equity loansauto dealer exposures held in AWMCCB for which the wholesale methodology is applied for determining the allowance for credit losses.
Recent deterioration in the macroeconomic environment driven by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and prime mortgagepressure on oil prices resulted in an increase in the allowance for credit losses with the largest impacts in the Oil & Gas, Real Estate and Consumer and Retail industries. As of March 31, 2020, the impacts of the macroeconomic environment have had only a limited impact to the overall credit profile, with the investment-grade percentage at 73% versus 74% at December 31, 2019. However, criticized exposure increased $6.6 billion from December 31, 2019 to $21.7 billion at March 31, 2020, but remains at relatively low levels compared to the overall size of the portfolio. The increase was largely driven by downgrades in Oil & Gas resulting from lower oil prices and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, and in Consumer & Retail primarily due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. The continuation or worsening of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the macroeconomic environment could result in further impacts to credit quality metrics, including investment-grade percentages, as well as to criticized and nonperforming exposures and charge-offs.
Retained loans heldincreased by $73.6 billion in Corporate.the three months ended March 31, 2020, predominantly driven by the CIB and CB, largely to commercial and industrial clients, and predominantly driven by drawdowns on committed revolving credit facilities, which resulted in a corresponding decrease in unfunded lending-related commitments. These drawdowns, which were driven by increased activity in March that returned to more normalized levels in April, were largely made by investment-grade clients, and can be broadly attributed to:
companies in industries directly and immediately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic;
stress in the commercial paper funding markets, and
preemptive drawdowns by companies concerned about the potential longer term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their cash flows and access to liquidity.
| | Wholesale credit portfolio | | Credit exposure | | Nonperforming(c) | Credit exposure | | Nonperforming |
(in millions) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Loans retained | $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| | $ | 1,470 |
| $ | 1,150 |
| $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 481,678 |
| | $ | 1,957 |
| $ | 1,057 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | 5,750 |
| 11,877 |
| | 86 |
| — |
| 4,224 |
| 4,062 |
| | 48 |
| 5 |
|
Loans at fair value | 5,760 |
| 3,151 |
| | 176 |
| 220 |
| 6,214 |
| 7,104 |
| | 90 |
| 90 |
|
Loans – reported | 449,017 |
| 454,190 |
| | 1,732 |
| 1,370 |
| 565,727 |
| 492,844 |
| | 2,095 |
| 1,152 |
|
Derivative receivables | 55,577 |
| 54,213 |
| | 26 |
| 60 |
| 81,648 |
| 49,766 |
| | 85 |
| 30 |
|
Receivables from customers and other(a) | 32,218 |
| 30,063 |
| | — |
| — |
| 33,376 |
| 33,706 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Total wholesale credit-related assets | 536,812 |
| 538,466 |
| | 1,758 |
| 1,430 |
| 680,751 |
| 576,316 |
| | 2,180 |
| 1,182 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions | | | | |
Real estate owned | | NA |
| NA |
| | 111 |
| 136 |
|
Other | | NA |
| NA |
| | — |
| 19 |
|
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions | | NA |
| NA |
| | 111 |
| 155 |
|
Lending-related commitments | 395,619 |
| 387,813 |
| | 446 |
| 469 |
| 358,485 |
| 413,310 |
| | 619 |
| 474 |
|
Total wholesale credit exposure | $ | 932,431 |
| $ | 926,279 |
| | $ | 2,204 |
| $ | 1,899 |
| |
Total wholesale credit portfolio | | $ | 1,039,236 |
| $ | 989,626 |
| | $ | 2,910 |
| $ | 1,811 |
|
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities(b) | $ | (15,031 | ) | $ | (12,682 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (20,773 | ) | $ | (18,030 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives | (15,482 | ) | (15,322 | ) | | NA |
| NA |
| (26,178 | ) | (16,009 | ) | | NA |
| NA |
|
| |
(a) | Receivables from customers and other include $32.2$33.4 billion and $30.1$33.7 billion of prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, to customersclients in CIB and AWM; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(b) | Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Credit derivatives on page 6663 and Note 45 for additional information. |
| |
(c) | Excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. |
The following tables present the maturity and internal risk ratings profiles of the wholesale credit portfolio as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019. The Firm considers internal ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal risk ratings, which generally correspondequivalent to the ratings assigned by S&P and Moody’s.BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade. Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for additionalfurther information on wholesale loan portfoliointernal risk ratings.
| | Wholesale credit exposure – maturity and ratings profile | Wholesale credit exposure – maturity and ratings profile | | | | | | Wholesale credit exposure – maturity and ratings profile | | | | | |
| Maturity profile(d) | | Ratings profile | Maturity profile(d) | | Ratings profile |
| Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG | Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG |
September 30, 2019 (in millions, except ratios) | | AAA/Aaa to BBB-/Baa3 | | BB+/Ba1 & below |
March 31, 2020 (in millions, except ratios) | | Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG |
Loans retained | $ | 132,888 |
| $ | 199,877 |
| $ | 104,742 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| | $ | 337,298 |
| | $ | 100,209 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| 77 | % |
Derivative receivables | | 55,577 |
| | | | | 55,577 |
| | | 81,648 |
| | | | | 81,648 |
| |
Less: Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives | | (15,482 | ) | | | | | (15,482 | ) | | | (26,178 | ) | | | | | (26,178 | ) | |
Total derivative receivables, net of all collateral | 8,332 |
| 8,263 |
| 23,500 |
| 40,095 |
| | 32,535 |
| | 7,560 |
| 40,095 |
| 81 |
| 17,069 |
| 11,637 |
| 26,764 |
| 55,470 |
| | 43,263 |
| | 12,207 |
| 55,470 |
| 78 |
|
Lending-related commitments | 75,484 |
| 307,093 |
| 13,042 |
| 395,619 |
| | 291,144 |
| | 104,475 |
| 395,619 |
| 74 |
| 92,209 |
| 254,173 |
| 12,103 |
| 358,485 |
| | 260,218 |
| | 98,267 |
| 358,485 |
| 73 |
|
Subtotal | 216,704 |
| 515,233 |
| 141,284 |
| 873,221 |
| | 660,977 |
| | 212,244 |
| 873,221 |
| 76 |
| 273,578 |
| 533,198 |
| 162,468 |
| 969,244 |
| | 710,804 |
| | 258,440 |
| 969,244 |
| 73 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) | | 11,510 |
| | | | | 11,510 |
| | | 10,438 |
| | | | | 10,438 |
| |
Receivables from customers and other | | 32,218 |
| | | | | 32,218 |
| | | 33,376 |
| | | | | 33,376 |
| |
Total exposure – net of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives | | $ | 916,949 |
| | | | | $ | 916,949 |
| | | $ | 1,013,058 |
| | | | | $ | 1,013,058 |
| |
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c) | $ | (864 | ) | $ | (8,013 | ) | $ | (6,154 | ) | $ | (15,031 | ) | | $ | (13,606 | ) | | $ | (1,425 | ) | $ | (15,031 | ) | 91 | % | $ | (4,011 | ) | $ | (9,078 | ) | $ | (7,684 | ) | $ | (20,773 | ) | | $ | (17,477 | ) | | $ | (3,296 | ) | $ | (20,773 | ) | 84 | % |
| | | Maturity profile(d) | | Ratings profile | Maturity profile(d) | | Ratings profile |
| Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG | Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG |
December 31, 2018 (in millions, except ratios) | | AAA/Aaa to BBB-/Baa3 | | BB+/Ba1 & below |
December 31, 2019 (in millions, except ratios) | | Due in 1 year or less | Due after 1 year through 5 years | Due after 5 years | Total | | Investment-grade | | Noninvestment-grade | Total | Total % of IG |
Loans retained | $ | 138,458 |
| $ | 196,974 |
| $ | 103,730 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| | $ | 339,729 |
| | $ | 99,433 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| 77 | % |
Derivative receivables | | 54,213 |
| | | | | 54,213 |
| | | 49,766 |
| | | | | 49,766 |
| |
Less: Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives | | (15,322 | ) | | | | | (15,322 | ) | | | (16,009 | ) | | | | | (16,009 | ) | |
Total derivative receivables, net of all collateral | 11,038 |
| 9,169 |
| 18,684 |
| 38,891 |
| | 31,794 |
| | 7,097 |
| 38,891 |
| 82 |
| 6,561 |
| 6,960 |
| 20,236 |
| 33,757 |
| | 26,966 |
| | 6,791 |
| 33,757 |
| 80 |
|
Lending-related commitments | 79,400 |
| 294,855 |
| 13,558 |
| 387,813 |
| | 288,724 |
| | 99,089 |
| 387,813 |
| 74 |
| 83,821 |
| 316,328 |
| 13,161 |
| 413,310 |
| | 294,317 |
| | 118,993 |
| 413,310 |
| 71 |
|
Subtotal | 228,896 |
| 500,998 |
| 135,972 |
| 865,866 |
| | 660,247 |
| | 205,619 |
| 865,866 |
| 76 |
| 232,002 |
| 541,611 |
| 155,132 |
| 928,745 |
| | 684,727 |
| | 244,018 |
| 928,745 |
| 74 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) | | 15,028 |
| | | | | 15,028 |
| | | 11,166 |
| | | | | 11,166 |
| |
Receivables from customers and other | | 30,063 |
| | | | | 30,063 |
| | | 33,706 |
| | | | | 33,706 |
| |
Total exposure – net of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives | | $ | 910,957 |
| | | | | $ | 910,957 |
| | | $ | 973,617 |
| | | | | $ | 973,617 |
| |
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c) | $ | (447 | ) | $ | (9,318 | ) | $ | (2,917 | ) | $ | (12,682 | ) | | $ | (11,213 | ) | | $ | (1,469 | ) | $ | (12,682 | ) | 88 | % | $ | (4,912 | ) | $ | (10,031 | ) | $ | (3,087 | ) | $ | (18,030 | ) | | $ | (16,276 | ) | | $ | (1,754 | ) | $ | (18,030 | ) | 90 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents loans held-for-sale, primarily related to syndicated loans and loans transferred from the retained portfolio, and loans at fair value. |
| |
(b) | These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. |
| |
(c) | The notional amounts are presented on a net basis by underlying reference entity and the ratings profile shown is based on the ratings of the reference entity on which protection has been purchased. Predominantly all of the credit derivatives entered into by the Firm where it has purchased protection used in credit portfolio management activities are executed with investment-grade counterparties. |
| |
(d) | The maturity profile of retained loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables is based on the remaining contractual maturity. Derivative contracts that are in a receivable position at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, may become payable prior to maturity based on their cash flow profile or changes in market conditions. |
Wholesale credit exposure – industry exposures
The Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry exposures, and pays particular attention to industries with actual or potential credit concerns. Exposures deemed criticized align with the U.S. banking regulators’ definition of criticized exposures, which consist of the special mention, substandard and doubtful categories.
categories. The total criticized component of the portfolio, excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value, was $12.8$21.7 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, compared with $12.1$15.1 billion at December 31, 2018.2019. The increase was largely driven by select client downgrades across a number of sectors.in Oil & Gas resulting from lower oil prices and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, and downgrades in Consumer & Retail primarily due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Below are summaries of the Firm’s exposures as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019. The industry of risk category is generally based on the client or counterparty’s primary business activity. Refer to Note 4 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for additional information on industry concentrations.
| | Wholesale credit exposure – industries(a) | Wholesale credit exposure – industries(a) | | | | | Wholesale credit exposure – industries(a) | | | | |
| | | | | | Selected metrics | | | | | | Selected metrics |
| | | | | | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | | | | | | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
| | | Noninvestment-grade | | | Noninvestment-grade |
As of or for the nine months ended | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade | | Noncriticized | | Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming | |
September 30, 2019 | |
As of or for the three months ended | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade | | Noncriticized | | Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming |
March 31, 2020 | | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
(in millions) | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade | | Noncriticized | | Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
Real Estate | $ | 148,246 |
| $ | 122,686 |
| | $ | 24,036 |
| | $ | 1,464 |
| $ | 60 |
|
Consumer & Retail | 110,669 |
| 57,486 |
| | 49,240 |
| | 3,657 |
| 286 |
|
Individuals and Individual Entities(b) | 99,653 |
| 88,477 |
| | 10,815 |
| | 269 |
| 92 |
| 108,180 |
| 94,220 |
| | 12,808 |
| | 970 |
| 182 |
|
Consumer & Retail | 98,445 |
| 56,815 |
| | 39,387 |
| | 2,086 |
| 157 |
| |
Industrials | | 68,864 |
| 44,260 |
| | 22,998 |
| | 1,412 |
| 194 |
| 168 |
| 20 |
| (691 | ) | (69 | ) |
Asset Managers | | 65,880 |
| 57,006 |
| | 8,814 |
| | 37 |
| 23 |
| 14 |
| — |
| — |
| (9,731 | ) |
Technology, Media & Telecommunications | 57,127 |
| 33,754 |
| | 20,723 |
| | 2,509 |
| 141 |
| 9 |
| 23 |
| (612 | ) | (17 | ) | 60,184 |
| 32,917 |
| | 24,144 |
| | 2,967 |
| 156 |
| 13 |
| — |
| (651 | ) | (14 | ) |
Industrials | 57,085 |
| 38,511 |
| | 17,203 |
| | 1,222 |
| 149 |
| 158 |
| 30 |
| (551 | ) | (17 | ) | |
Banks & Finance Cos | 53,185 |
| 36,764 |
| | 15,979 |
| | 378 |
| 64 |
| 27 |
| — |
| (832 | ) | (2,683 | ) | 55,786 |
| 38,250 |
| | 16,826 |
| | 704 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| — |
| (1,137 | ) | (3,290 | ) |
Asset Managers | 50,119 |
| 44,006 |
| | 6,096 |
| | 4 |
| 13 |
| 26 |
| — |
| — |
| (5,201 | ) | |
Healthcare | 48,041 |
| 36,641 |
| | 10,422 |
| | 891 |
| 87 |
| 40 |
| 6 |
| (230 | ) | (177 | ) | 53,250 |
| 39,639 |
| | 12,155 |
| | 1,261 |
| 195 |
| 49 |
| 51 |
| (392 | ) | (183 | ) |
Oil & Gas | 44,007 |
| 23,882 |
| | 18,615 |
| | 635 |
| 875 |
| 9 |
| 43 |
| (445 | ) | (12 | ) | 42,754 |
| 22,273 |
| | 16,252 |
| | 3,274 |
| 955 |
| — |
| 59 |
| (527 | ) | — |
|
Automotive | | 36,060 |
| 24,614 |
| | 10,287 |
| | 1,156 |
| 3 |
| 29 |
| — |
| (348 | ) | — |
|
Utilities | 29,709 |
| 23,543 |
| | 5,806 |
| | 184 |
| 176 |
| 10 |
| 37 |
| (387 | ) | (75 | ) | 33,112 |
| 24,057 |
| | 8,645 |
| | 407 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (437 | ) | (84 | ) |
State & Municipal Govt(c) | 26,806 |
| 26,287 |
| | 519 |
| | — |
| — |
| 13 |
| — |
| — |
| (51 | ) | 30,529 |
| 30,026 |
| | 500 |
| | — |
| 3 |
| 55 |
| — |
| — |
| (201 | ) |
Transportation | | 18,624 |
| 9,247 |
| | 8,690 |
| | 535 |
| 152 |
| 30 |
| 10 |
| (239 | ) | (48 | ) |
Chemicals & Plastics | 16,870 |
| 11,311 |
| | 5,490 |
| | 69 |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| (10 | ) | — |
| 17,430 |
| 11,742 |
| | 5,364 |
| | 322 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| — |
| (12 | ) | — |
|
Central Govt | 16,685 |
| 16,264 |
| | 421 |
| | — |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| (8,527 | ) | (2,836 | ) | 16,519 |
| 16,169 |
| | 350 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (8,380 | ) | (2,883 | ) |
Automotive | 16,430 |
| 10,053 |
| | 5,978 |
| | 399 |
| — |
| 6 |
| — |
| (172 | ) | — |
| |
Metals & Mining | 15,049 |
| 8,396 |
| | 6,280 |
| | 359 |
| 14 |
| — |
| (1 | ) | (204 | ) | (8 | ) | 15,797 |
| 6,999 |
| | 8,045 |
| | 673 |
| 80 |
| 3 |
| 10 |
| (136 | ) | (12 | ) |
Transportation | 14,969 |
| 9,196 |
| | 5,356 |
| | 317 |
| 100 |
| 37 |
| 4 |
| (36 | ) | (38 | ) | |
Insurance | 13,365 |
| 10,517 |
| | 2,824 |
| | 19 |
| 5 |
| — |
| — |
| (36 | ) | (2,062 | ) | 14,522 |
| 10,806 |
| | 3,693 |
| | 18 |
| 5 |
| — |
| — |
| (76 | ) | (3,209 | ) |
Financial Markets Infrastructure | 5,775 |
| 5,640 |
| | 135 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (7 | ) | 9,767 |
| 9,607 |
| | 160 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (46 | ) |
Securities Firms | 4,418 |
| 2,789 |
| | 1,605 |
| | 24 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (49 | ) | (387 | ) | 8,045 |
| 5,905 |
| | 2,114 |
| | 1 |
| 25 |
| — |
| — |
| (49 | ) | (3,281 | ) |
All other(d) | 73,510 |
| 70,286 |
| | 2,892 |
| | 330 |
| 2 |
| 20 |
| 7 |
| (2,634 | ) | (1,087 | ) | 81,204 |
| 75,365 |
| | 5,365 |
| | 143 |
| 331 |
| 45 |
| (8 | ) | (7,237 | ) | (1,478 | ) |
Subtotal | $ | 888,703 |
| $ | 674,831 |
| | $ | 201,025 |
| | $ | 10,905 |
| $ | 1,942 |
| $ | 978 |
| $ | 236 |
| $ | (15,031 | ) | $ | (15,482 | ) | $ | 995,422 |
| $ | 733,274 |
| | $ | 240,486 |
| | $ | 19,001 |
| $ | 2,661 |
| $ | 1,208 |
| $ | 162 |
| $ | (20,773 | ) | $ | (26,178 | ) |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 11,510 |
| | | | | | | 10,438 |
| | | | | | |
Receivables from customers and other | 32,218 |
| | | | | | 33,376 |
| | | | | |
Total(e) | $ | 932,431 |
| | | | | | $ | 1,039,236 |
| | | | | |
| | (continued from previous page) | (continued from previous page) | | | | | | (continued from previous page) | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Selected metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
| Selected metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
|
|
| Noninvestment-grade |
|
| Noninvestment-grade |
As of or for the year ended | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade |
| Noncriticized |
| Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade |
| Noncriticized |
| Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming |
December 31, 2018 |
December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade |
| Noncriticized |
| Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | Credit exposure(f) | Investment- grade |
| Noncriticized |
| Criticized performing | Criticized nonperforming | 30 days or more past due and accruing loans | Net charge-offs/ (recoveries) | Credit derivative hedges(g) | Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
Real Estate |
Consumer & Retail |
Individuals and Individual Entities(b) | 97,077 |
| 86,581 |
| | 10,164 |
| | 174 |
| 158 |
| 105,018 |
| 93,172 |
|
| 11,617 |
|
| 192 |
| 37 |
|
Consumer & Retail | 94,815 |
| 60,678 |
|
| 31,901 |
|
| 2,033 |
| 203 |
| |
Industrials | | 62,483 |
| 39,434 |
| | 21,673 |
| | 1,157 |
| 219 |
| 172 |
| 48 |
| (746 | ) | (9 | ) |
Asset Managers | | 51,856 |
| 45,249 |
|
| 6,588 |
|
| 6 |
| 13 |
| 18 |
| — |
| — |
| (4,785 | ) |
Technology, Media & Telecommunications | 72,646 |
| 46,334 |
| | 24,081 |
| | 2,170 |
| 61 |
| 8 |
| 12 |
| (1,011 | ) | (12 | ) | 60,033 |
| 35,878 |
| | 21,066 |
| | 2,953 |
| 136 |
| 27 |
| 27 |
| (658 | ) | (17 | ) |
Industrials | 58,528 |
| 38,487 |
|
| 18,594 |
|
| 1,311 |
| 136 |
| 171 |
| 20 |
| (207 | ) | (29 | ) | |
Banks & Finance Cos | 49,920 |
| 34,120 |
| | 15,496 |
| | 299 |
| 5 |
| 11 |
| — |
| (575 | ) | (2,290 | ) | 50,786 |
| 34,941 |
|
| 15,031 |
|
| 808 |
| 6 |
| — |
| — |
| (834 | ) | (2,112 | ) |
Asset Managers | 42,807 |
| 36,722 |
|
| 6,067 |
|
| 4 |
| 14 |
| 10 |
| — |
| — |
| (5,829 | ) | |
Healthcare | 48,142 |
| 36,687 |
|
| 10,625 |
|
| 761 |
| 69 |
| 23 |
| (5 | ) | (150 | ) | (133 | ) | 50,824 |
| 36,988 |
|
| 12,544 |
|
| 1,141 |
| 151 |
| 108 |
| 14 |
| (405 | ) | (145 | ) |
Oil & Gas | 42,600 |
| 23,356 |
|
| 17,451 |
|
| 1,158 |
| 635 |
| 6 |
| 36 |
| (248 | ) | — |
| 41,641 |
| 22,244 |
|
| 17,823 |
|
| 995 |
| 579 |
| — |
| 98 |
| (429 | ) | (10 | ) |
Automotive | | 35,118 |
| 24,255 |
|
| 10,246 |
|
| 615 |
| 2 |
| 8 |
| 1 |
| (194 | ) | — |
|
Utilities | 28,172 |
| 23,558 |
|
| 4,326 |
|
| 138 |
| 150 |
| — |
| 38 |
| (142 | ) | (60 | ) | 34,843 |
| 22,213 |
|
| 12,316 |
|
| 301 |
| 13 |
| 2 |
| 39 |
| (414 | ) | (50 | ) |
State & Municipal Govt(c) | 27,351 |
| 26,746 |
|
| 603 |
|
| 2 |
| — |
| 18 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| (42 | ) | 30,095 |
| 29,586 |
|
| 509 |
|
| — |
| — |
| 33 |
| 7 |
| — |
| (46 | ) |
Transportation | | 14,497 |
| 8,734 |
| | 5,336 |
| | 353 |
| 74 |
| 30 |
| 8 |
| (37 | ) | (37 | ) |
Chemicals & Plastics | 16,035 |
| 11,490 |
|
| 4,427 |
|
| 118 |
| — |
| 4 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 17,499 |
| 12,033 |
|
| 5,243 |
|
| 221 |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| — |
| (10 | ) | (13 | ) |
Central Govt | 18,456 |
| 18,251 |
| | 124 |
| | 81 |
| — |
| 4 |
| — |
| (7,994 | ) | (2,130 | ) | 14,865 |
| 14,524 |
|
| 341 |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (9,018 | ) | (1,963 | ) |
Automotive | 17,339 |
| 9,637 |
|
| 7,310 |
|
| 392 |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| (125 | ) | — |
| |
Metals & Mining | 15,359 |
| 8,188 |
|
| 6,767 |
|
| 385 |
| 19 |
| 1 |
| — |
| (174 | ) | (22 | ) | 15,586 |
| 7,095 |
|
| 7,789 |
|
| 661 |
| 41 |
| 2 |
| (1 | ) | (33 | ) | (6 | ) |
Transportation | 15,660 |
| 10,508 |
|
| 4,699 |
|
| 393 |
| 60 |
| 21 |
| 6 |
| (31 | ) | (112 | ) | |
Insurance | 12,639 |
| 9,777 |
|
| 2,830 |
|
| — |
| 32 |
| — |
| — |
| (36 | ) | (2,080 | ) | 12,348 |
| 9,458 |
|
| 2,867 |
|
| 19 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| — |
| (36 | ) | (1,998 | ) |
Financial Markets Infrastructure | 7,484 |
| 6,746 |
|
| 738 |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (26 | ) | 4,121 |
| 3,969 |
|
| 152 |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (6 | ) |
Securities Firms | 4,558 |
| 3,099 |
|
| 1,459 |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (158 | ) | (823 | ) | 7,344 |
| 5,973 |
|
| 1,344 |
|
| 27 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (48 | ) | (3,201 | ) |
All other(d) | 68,284 |
| 64,664 |
|
| 3,606 |
|
| 12 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (1,581 | ) | (804 | ) | 78,006 |
| 73,453 |
|
| 4,130 |
|
| 412 |
| 11 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| (4,833 | ) | (959 | ) |
Subtotal | $ | 881,188 |
| $ | 673,617 |
|
| $ | 195,442 |
|
| $ | 10,450 |
| $ | 1,679 |
| $ | 1,096 |
| $ | 155 |
| $ | (12,682 | ) | $ | (15,322 | ) | $ | 944,754 |
| $ | 699,510 |
|
| $ | 230,104 |
|
| $ | 13,579 |
| $ | 1,561 |
| $ | 1,022 |
| $ | 415 |
| $ | (18,030 | ) | $ | (16,009 | ) |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 15,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from customers and other | 30,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(e) | $ | 926,279 |
| | | | | | $ | 989,626 |
| | | | | |
| |
(a) | The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2018,2019, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2018.2019. |
| |
(b) | Individuals and Individual Entities predominantly consists of Wealth Management clients within AWM and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts. |
| |
(c) | In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, noted above, the Firm held: $6.9$6.5 billion at both periods of trading assets; $30.5 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, of trading securities; $31.1 billion and $37.7$29.8 billion, respectively, of AFS securities; and $4.8 billion at both periods of held-to-maturity (“HTM”)HTM securities, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. Refer to Note 2 and Note 910 for further information. |
| |
(d) | All other includes: SPEs and Private education and civic organizations, representing approximately 91%90% and 9%10%, respectively, at September 30, 2019,both March 31, 2020 and 92% and 8%, respectively, at December 31, 2018.2019. |
| |
(e) | Excludes cash placed with banks of $248.8$354.4 billion and $268.1$254.0 billion, at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, which is predominantly placed with various central banks, primarily Federal Reserve Banks. |
| |
(f) | Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities held against derivative receivables or loans and liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables. |
| |
(g) | Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The All other category includes purchased credit protection on certain credit indices. |
Real Estate
Presented below is additional informationdetail on certain of the Firm’s largest industry exposures and/or certain industries which present potential heightened credit concerns.
Real Estate industry, to which the Firm has significant exposure.
Real Estate exposure increased $4.1was $148.2 billion to $147.5 billion foras of March 31, 2020, largely driven by multifamily lending as shown in the ninetable below. During the three months ended September 30, 2019, andMarch 31, 2020 the investment grade percentageinvestment-grade portion of the portfolio remained relatively flat atincreased from 81% to 83%, while the drawn percentage increased from 78% to 83%. Refer to Note 11 for further information onRetail-related Real Estate loans.and Lodging exposure within Other in the table below was $15.1 billion as of March 31, 2020 of which 74% was investment-grade; noninvestment-grade Retail and Lodging exposure is largely secured.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | March 31, 2020 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment-grade | % Drawn(c) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment-grade | % Drawn(c) |
Multifamily(a) | $ | 85,666 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 85,752 |
| | 91 | % | | 92 | % | | $ | 86,630 |
| | $ | 125 |
| | $ | 86,755 |
| | 90 | % | | 92 | % | |
Other | 60,968 |
| | 735 |
| | 61,703 |
| | 71 |
| | 59 |
| | 60,322 |
| | 1,169 |
| | 61,491 |
| | 73 |
| | 71 |
| |
Total Real Estate Exposure(b) | 146,634 |
| | 821 |
| | 147,455 |
| | 83 |
| | 79 |
| | 146,952 |
| | 1,294 |
| | 148,246 |
| | 83 |
| | 83 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2019 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment- grade | % Drawn(c) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment- grade | % Drawn(c) |
Multifamily(a) | $ | 85,683 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 85,716 |
| | 89 | % | | 92 | % | | $ | 86,381 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 86,439 |
| | 91 | % | | 92 | % | |
Other | 57,469 |
| | 131 |
| | 57,600 |
| | 72 |
| | 63 |
| | 63,805 |
| | 561 |
| | 64,366 |
| | 67 |
| | 59 |
| |
Total Real Estate Exposure(b) | 143,152 |
| | 164 |
| | 143,316 |
| | 82 |
| | 81 |
| | 150,186 |
| | 619 |
| | 150,805 |
| | 81 |
| | 78 |
| |
| |
(a) | Multifamily exposure is largely in California. |
| |
(b) | Real Estate exposure is predominantly secured; unsecured exposure as of March 31, 2020 is predominantly investment-grade. |
| |
(c) | Represents drawn exposure as a percentage of credit exposure. |
Consumer & Retail
Consumer & Retail exposure was $110.7 billion as of March 31, 2020, and predominantly includes Retail, Food and Beverage, and Business and Consumer Services as shown in the table below. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the investment-grade portion of the Consumer & Retail portfolio decreased from 55% to 52% and the drawn percentage of this portfolio increased from 35% to 49%, both driven primarily by impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, criticized exposure increased by approximately $1.4 billion from $2.5 billion at December 31, 2019 to $3.9 billion at March 31, 2020, also primarily driven by impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment-grade | % Drawn(d) |
Retail(a) | $ | 31,487 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 31,820 |
| | 52 | % | | 51 | % | |
Food and Beverage | 28,401 |
| | 1,192 |
| | 29,593 |
| | 63 |
| | 46 |
| |
Business and Consumer Services | 23,423 |
| | 722 |
| | 24,145 |
| | 52 |
| | 51 |
| |
Consumer Hard Goods | 12,667 |
| | 183 |
| | 12,850 |
| | 60 |
| | 55 |
| |
Leisure(b) | 11,867 |
| | 394 |
| | 12,261 |
| | 16 |
| | 41 |
| |
Total Consumer & Retail(c) | 107,845 |
| | 2,824 |
| | 110,669 |
| | 52 |
| | 49 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2019 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment- grade | % Drawn(d) |
Retail(a) | $ | 29,290 |
| | $ | 294 |
| | $ | 29,584 |
| | 54 | % | | 37 | % | |
Food and Beverage | 27,956 |
| | 625 |
| | 28,581 |
| | 67 |
| | 36 |
| |
Business and Consumer Services | 24,242 |
| | 249 |
| | 24,491 |
| | 51 |
| | 37 |
| |
Consumer Hard Goods | 13,144 |
| | 109 |
| | 13,253 |
| | 65 |
| | 35 |
| |
Leisure(b) | 10,930 |
| | 147 |
| | 11,077 |
| | 21 |
| | 19 |
| |
Total Consumer & Retail(c) | 105,562 |
| | 1,424 |
| | 106,986 |
| | 55 |
| | 35 |
| |
| |
(a) | Retail consists of Home Improvement & Specialty Retailers, Restaurants, Supermarkets, Discount & Drug Stores, Specialty Apparel and Department Stores. |
| |
(b) | Leisure consists of Gaming, Arts & Culture, Travel Services and Sports & Recreation. Approximately 90% of the noninvestment-grade Leisure portfolio is secured. |
| |
(c) | Approximately 75% of the noninvestment-grade portfolio is secured. |
| |
(d) | Represents drawn exposure as a percent of credit exposure. |
Oil & Gas
Oil & Gas exposure was $42.8 billion as of March 31, 2020, including $21.5 billion of Exploration & Production and Oilfield Services as shown in the table below. During thethree months ended March 31, 2020, the investment-grade portion of the Oil & Gas portfolio decreased from 53% to 52%, and the drawn percentage of this portfolio increased from 31% to 37%, both driven by lower oil prices and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, criticized exposure increased by $2.6 billion from $1.6 billion at December 31, 2019 to $4.2 billion at March 31, 2020, also driven by lower oil prices and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment-grade | % Drawn(c) |
Exploration & Production ("E&P") and Oil field Services | $ | 21,280 |
| | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 21,493 |
| | 33 | % | | 44 | % | |
Other Oil & Gas(a) | 20,637 |
| | 624 |
| | 21,261 |
| | 72 |
| | 30 |
| |
Total Oil & Gas(b) | 41,917 |
| | 837 |
| | 42,754 |
| | 52 |
| | 37 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2019 | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Loans and Lending-related Commitments | | Derivative Receivables | | Credit exposure | | % Investment- grade | % Drawn(c) |
Exploration & Production ("E&P") and Oil field Services | $ | 22,543 |
| | $ | 646 |
| | $ | 23,189 |
| | 38 | % | | 38 | % | |
Other Oil & Gas(a) | 18,246 |
| | 206 |
| | 18,452 |
| | 73 |
| | 23 |
| |
Total Oil & Gas(b) | 40,789 |
| | 852 |
| | 41,641 |
| | 53 |
| | 31 |
| |
| |
(a) | Other Oil & Gas includes Integrated Oil & Gas companies, Midstream/Oil Pipeline companies and refineries. |
| |
(b) | Secured lending was $15.5 billion and $15.7 billion at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, approximately half of which is reserve-based lending to the Exploration & Production sub-sector; unsecured exposure is largely investment-grade. |
| |
(c) | Represents drawn exposure as a percent of credit exposure. |
Loans
In the normal course of its wholesale business,businesses, the Firm provides loans to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals. Refer to Note 1112 for a further discussion on loans, including information onabout delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators and sales of loans.indicators.
The following table presents the change in the nonaccrual loan portfolio for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. The increase in nonaccrual loans in the first quarter of 2020 reflects select downgrades across a number of sectors, including Oil & Gas.
| | Wholesale nonaccrual loan activity | Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | | 2020 | 2019 |
Beginning balance | | $ | 1,370 |
| $ | 1,734 |
| | $ | 1,152 |
| $ | 1,587 |
|
Additions | | 1,907 |
| 570 |
| | 1,333 |
| 841 |
|
Reductions: | | | | |
Paydowns and other | | 1,097 |
| 541 |
| | 171 |
| 213 |
|
Gross charge-offs | | 235 |
| 251 |
| | 181 |
| 60 |
|
Returned to performing status | | 25 |
| 217 |
| | 24 |
| 58 |
|
Sales | | 188 |
| 287 |
| | 14 |
| 5 |
|
Total reductions | | 1,545 |
| 1,296 |
| | 390 |
| 336 |
|
Net changes | | 362 |
| (726 | ) | | 943 |
| 505 |
|
Ending balance | | $ | 1,732 |
| $ | 1,008 |
| | $ | 2,095 |
| $ | 2,092 |
|
The following table presents net charge-offs/recoveries, which are defined as gross charge-offs less recoveries, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. The amounts in the table below do not include gains or losses from sales of nonaccrual loans.
| | Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries) | Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries) | | | Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries) |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Loans – reported | | | | |
Average loans retained | $ | 433,744 |
| $ | 420,597 |
| | $ | 434,434 |
| $ | 413,537 |
| $ | 491,819 |
| $ | 471,957 |
|
Gross charge-offs | 120 |
| 23 |
| | 270 |
| 264 |
| 181 |
| 64 |
|
Gross recoveries | (12 | ) | (70 | ) | | (34 | ) | (146 | ) | |
Gross recoveries collected | | (19 | ) | (12 | ) |
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) | 108 |
| (47 | ) | | 236 |
| 118 |
| 162 |
| 52 |
|
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate | 0.10 | % | (0.04 | )% | | 0.07 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.04 | % |
Lending-related commitments
The Firm uses lending-related financial instruments, such as commitments (including revolving credit facilities) and guarantees, to address the financing needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or when the Firm fulfillfulfills its obligations under these guarantees, and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts. Most of these commitments and guarantees arehave historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expireexpired without being drawn upon or a default occurring. InAs a result, the Firm’s view,Firm does not believe that the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the Firm’s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. Refer to Note 2223 for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments.
Receivables from Customers
Receivables from customers primarily represent held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (e.g., cash on deposit, liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities), as such no allowance for credit losses is held against these receivables. To manage its credit risk the Firm establishes margin requirements and monitors the required margin levels on an ongoing basis, and requires clients to deposit additional cash or other collateral, or to reduce positions, when appropriate. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative contracts
Derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange, equities, and commodities. The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. The Firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure. Refer to Note 45 for a further discussion of derivative contracts.
The following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented.
| | Derivative receivables | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Total, net of cash collateral | 55,577 |
| 54,213 |
| 81,648 |
| 49,766 |
|
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables(a) | (15,482 | ) | (15,322 | ) | (26,178 | ) | (16,009 | ) |
Total, net of collateral | $ | 40,095 |
| $ | 38,891 |
| $ | 55,470 |
| $ | 33,757 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements. |
The fair value of derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated balance sheets were $55.6$81.6 billion and $54.2$49.8 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, respectively.2019, respectively, with increases in CIB resulting from market movements, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the Firm. However, in management’s view, the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities (primarily U.S. government and agency securities and other group of seven nations (“G7”) government securities) and other cash collateral held by the Firm aggregating $15.5$26.2 billion and $15.3$16.0 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, that may be used as security when the fair value of the client’s exposure is in the Firm’s favor.
In addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph, theThe Firm also holds additional collateral (primarily cash, G7 government securities, other liquid government agency and guaranteed securities, and corporate debt and equity securities) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions, as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the Firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. Although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above, it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client’s derivative contracts move in the Firm’s favor. The derivative receivables fair value, net of all collateral, also does not include other credit enhancements, such as letters of credit. Refer to Note 45 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements.
The following table summarizes the ratings profile of the Firm’s derivative receivables, including credit derivatives, net of all collateral, at the dates indicated. The ratings scale is based on the Firm’sFirm considers internal ratings which generally correspondequivalent to the ratingsBBB-/Baa3 or higher as assigned by S&P and Moody’s.investment grade. Refer to Note 12 for further information on internal risk ratings.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratings profile of derivative receivables | | | | | |
Rating equivalent
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
(in millions, except ratios) | Exposure net of all collateral | % of exposure net of all collateral | | Exposure net of all collateral | % of exposure net of all collateral |
AAA/Aaa to AA-/Aa3 | $ | 10,663 |
| 27 | % | | $ | 11,831 |
| 31 | % |
A+/A1 to A-/A3 | 6,106 |
| 15 |
| | 7,428 |
| 19 |
|
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 | 15,766 |
| 39 |
| | 12,536 |
| 32 |
|
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 | 7,116 |
| 18 |
| | 6,373 |
| 16 |
|
CCC+/Caa1 and below | 444 |
| 1 |
| | 723 |
| 2 |
|
Total | $ | 40,095 |
| 100 | % | | $ | 38,891 |
| 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratings profile of derivative receivables | | | | | |
Internal rating equivalent
| March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions, except ratios) | Exposure net of all collateral | % of exposure net of all collateral | | Exposure net of all collateral | % of exposure net of all collateral |
AAA/Aaa to AA-/Aa3 | $ | 16,318 |
| 29 | % | | $ | 8,347 |
| 25 | % |
A+/A1 to A-/A3 | 8,297 |
| 15 |
| | 5,471 |
| 16 |
|
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 | 18,648 |
| 34 |
| | 13,148 |
| 39 |
|
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 | 10,904 |
| 20 |
| | 6,225 |
| 18 |
|
CCC+/Caa1 and below | 1,303 |
| 2 |
| | 566 |
| 2 |
|
Total | $ | 55,470 |
| 100 | % | | $ | 33,757 |
| 100 | % |
As previously noted, the Firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk. The percentage of the Firm’s over-the-counter derivative contracts subject to collateral agreements — excluding foreign exchange spot trades, which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily — was approximately 86% and 90% at both September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019, respectively.
Credit derivatives
The Firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes: first, in its capacity as a market-maker, and second, as an end-user, to manage the Firm’s own credit risk associated with various exposures.
Credit portfolio management activities
Included in the Firm’s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities (loans and unfunded commitments) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the Firm’s wholesale businesses (collectively, “credit portfolio management” activities). Information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below.
| | Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities | | Notional amount of protection purchased and sold(a) | Notional amount of protection purchased and sold(a) |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Credit derivatives used to manage: | | | | | | |
Loans and lending-related commitments | $ | 1,726 |
| | $ | 1,272 |
| $ | 3,511 |
| | $ | 2,047 |
|
Derivative receivables | 13,305 |
| | 11,410 |
| 17,262 |
| | 15,983 |
|
Credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities | $ | 15,031 |
| | $ | 12,682 |
| $ | 20,773 |
| | $ | 18,030 |
|
| |
(a) | Amounts are presented net, considering the Firm’s net protection purchased or sold with respect to each underlying reference entity or index. |
Refer to Credit derivatives in Note 45 of this Form 10-Q and Note 5 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on credit derivatives and derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities.
|
| | | | |
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The adoption of this guidance established a single allowance framework for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This framework requires that management’s estimate reflects credit losses over the instrument’s remaining expected life and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
The Firm’s allowance for credit losses comprises:
the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained consumer and wholesale loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated) and is presented separately on the balance sheet,
the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is presented on the balance sheet in accounts payable and other liabilities, and
the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which covers the Firm’s HTM and AFS securities and is recognized within Investment Securities on the balance sheet.
Refer to Note 13 and Note 10 for a description of the policies, methodologies and judgments used to determine the Firm’s allowances for credit losses on loans, lending-related commitments, and investment securities.
The allowance for credit losses increased compared with December 31, 2019, reflecting:
additions of $6.8 billion associated with the deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and continued pressure on oil prices including:
| |
– | $4.4 billion in consumer, predominantly in Credit Card, reflecting the deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and |
| |
– | a net $2.4 billion in wholesale, primarily reflecting the deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple sectors, and continued pressure on oil prices, with the largest impacts in the Oil & Gas, Real Estate, and Consumer & Retail industries, and |
a net $4.3 billion addition as a result of the adoption of CECL.
In light of the rapidly evolving economic conditions and forecasts during March 2020, management updated its macroeconomic forecast near the end of its credit loss estimation process in early April. This macroeconomic forecast included a decline in the U.S. real GDP of approximately 25% and an increase in the U.S. unemployment rate to above 10%, both in the second quarter, followed by a solid recovery in the second half of 2020. In addition, the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments reflect the estimated impact of the Firm’s payment relief actions as well as the Firm’s wholesalefederal government’s stimulus programs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent changes to this forecast and certain consumer lending-related commitments.related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods.
Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 76–75–77 and Note 12 of this Form 10-Q, and Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 141-143 and Note 13 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on the components of the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments.
At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the CRO, the CFO and the Controller of the Firm. As of September 30, 2019, JPMorgan Chase deemed the allowance for credit losses to be appropriate and sufficient to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio.
The allowance for credit losses decreased compared with December 31, 2018, driven by:
a $550 million reduction in the CCB allowance for loan losses, which includes $400 million in the PCI residential real estate portfolio, reflecting continued improvement in home prices and delinquencies; $100 million in the non credit-impaired residential real estate portfolio; and $50 million in the business banking portfolio; as well as
a $132 million reduction for write-offs of PCI loans,
predominantly offset by
a $400 million addition to the allowance for loan losses in the credit card portfolio reflecting higher loss rates, as newer vintages season and become a larger part of the portfolio and loan growth; as well as
a $170 million addition in the wholesale allowance for credit losses largely driven by select C&I client downgrades.
Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 56–59,52–55, Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 60–6656–63 and Note 1112 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios.
The adoption of the CECL accounting guidance resulted in a change in the accounting for PCI loans, which are considered PCD loans. In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Nine months ended September 30, | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total |
(in millions, except ratios) | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 4,146 |
| $ | 5,184 |
| $ | 4,115 |
| $ | 13,445 |
| | $ | 4,579 |
| $ | 4,884 |
| $ | 4,141 |
| $ | 13,604 |
|
Gross charge-offs | 702 |
| 4,050 |
| 270 |
| 5,022 |
| | 776 |
| 3,777 |
| 264 |
| 4,817 |
|
Gross recoveries | (420 | ) | (433 | ) | (34 | ) | (887 | ) | | (681 | ) | (370 | ) | (146 | ) | (1,197 | ) |
Net charge-offs | 282 |
| 3,617 |
| 236 |
| 4,135 |
| | 95 |
| 3,407 |
| 118 |
| 3,620 |
|
Write-offs of PCI loans(a) | 132 |
| — |
| — |
| 132 |
| | 151 |
| — |
| — |
| 151 |
|
Provision for loan losses | (265 | ) | 4,017 |
| 296 |
| 4,048 |
| | (152 | ) | 3,557 |
| (111 | ) | 3,294 |
|
Other | — |
| (1 | ) | 10 |
| 9 |
| | 1 |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
|
Ending balance at September 30, | $ | 3,467 |
| $ | 5,583 |
| $ | 4,185 |
| $ | 13,235 |
| | $ | 4,182 |
| $ | 5,034 |
| $ | 3,912 |
| $ | 13,128 |
|
Impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific(b) | $ | 145 |
| $ | 488 |
| $ | 342 |
| $ | 975 |
| | $ | 204 |
| $ | 421 |
| $ | 280 |
| $ | 905 |
|
Formula-based | 2,066 |
| 5,095 |
| 3,843 |
| 11,004 |
| | 2,154 |
| 4,613 |
| 3,632 |
| 10,399 |
|
PCI | 1,256 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,256 |
| | 1,824 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,824 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 3,467 |
| $ | 5,583 |
| $ | 4,185 |
| $ | 13,235 |
| | $ | 4,182 |
| $ | 5,034 |
| $ | 3,912 |
| $ | 13,128 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,022 |
| $ | 1,055 |
| | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,035 |
| $ | 1,068 |
|
Provision for lending-related commitments | — |
| — |
| 110 |
| 110 |
| | — |
| — |
| 29 |
| 29 |
|
Other | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Ending balance at September 30, | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,132 |
| $ | 1,165 |
| | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,064 |
| $ | 1,097 |
|
Impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 135 |
| $ | 135 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 71 |
| $ | 71 |
|
Formula-based | 33 |
| — |
| 997 |
| 1,030 |
| | 33 |
| — |
| 993 |
| 1,026 |
|
Total allowance for lending-related commitments(c) | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,132 |
| $ | 1,165 |
| | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,064 |
| $ | 1,097 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 3,500 |
| $ | 5,583 |
| $ | 5,317 |
| $ | 14,400 |
| | $ | 4,215 |
| $ | 5,034 |
| $ | 4,976 |
| $ | 14,225 |
|
Memo: | | | | | | | | | |
Retained loans, end of period | $ | 331,809 |
| $ | 159,571 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 928,887 |
| | $ | 375,958 |
| $ | 147,856 |
| $ | 423,837 |
| $ | 947,651 |
|
Retained loans, average | 355,865 |
| 154,367 |
| 434,434 |
| 944,666 |
| | 374,298 |
| 143,931 |
| 413,537 |
| 931,766 |
|
PCI loans, end of period | 21,290 |
| — |
| — |
| 21,290 |
| | 25,209 |
| — |
| 3 |
| 25,212 |
|
Credit ratios | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans | 1.04 | % | 3.50 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.42 | % | | 1.11 | % | 3.40 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.39 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans(d) | 108 |
| NM |
| 285 |
| 282 |
| | 115 |
| NM |
| 394 |
| 284 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit card | 108 |
| NM |
| 285 |
| 163 |
| | 115 |
| NM |
| 394 |
| 175 |
|
Net charge-off rates | 0.11 |
| 3.13 |
| 0.07 |
| 0.59 |
| | 0.03 |
| 3.16 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.52 |
|
Credit ratios, excluding residential real estate PCI loans | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans | 0.71 |
| 3.50 |
| 0.96 |
| 1.32 |
| | 0.67 |
| 3.40 |
| 0.92 |
| 1.23 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans(d) | 69 |
| NM |
| 285 |
| 256 |
| | 65 |
| NM |
| 394 |
| 244 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit card | 69 |
| NM |
| 285 |
| 136 |
| | 65 |
| NM |
| 394 |
| 135 |
|
Net charge-off rates | 0.11 | % | 3.13 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.60 | % | | 0.04 | % | 3.16 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.54 | % |
Note: In the table above, the financial measures which exclude the impact of PCI loans are non-GAAP financial measures. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for credit losses and related information | | | | | |
| 2020(d) | | 2019 |
Three months ended March 31, | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total |
(in millions, except ratios) | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 2,538 |
| $ | 5,683 |
| $ | 4,902 |
| $ | 13,123 |
| | $ | 3,434 |
| $ | 5,184 |
| $ | 4,827 |
| $ | 13,445 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 297 |
| 5,517 |
| (1,642 | ) | 4,172 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
|
Gross charge-offs | 233 |
| 1,488 |
| 181 |
| 1,902 |
| | 234 |
| 1,344 |
| 64 |
| 1,642 |
|
Gross recoveries collected | (239 | ) | (175 | ) | (19 | ) | (433 | ) | | (127 | ) | (142 | ) | (12 | ) | (281 | ) |
Net charge-offs | (6 | ) | 1,313 |
| 162 |
| 1,469 |
| | 107 |
| 1,202 |
| 52 |
| 1,361 |
|
Write-offs of PCI loans(a) | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 50 |
| — |
| — |
| 50 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 613 |
| 5,063 |
| 1,742 |
| 7,418 |
| | 120 |
| 1,202 |
| 170 |
| 1,492 |
|
Other | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 2 |
| (1 | ) | 6 |
| 7 |
|
Ending balance at March 31, | $ | 3,454 |
| $ | 14,950 |
| $ | 4,840 |
| $ | 23,244 |
| | $ | 3,399 |
| $ | 5,183 |
| $ | 4,951 |
| $ | 13,533 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for lending-related commitments | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,179 |
| $ | 1,191 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,043 |
| $ | 1,055 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 133 |
| — |
| (35 | ) | 98 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
|
Provision for lending-related commitments | 6 |
| — |
| 852 |
| 858 |
| | — |
| — |
| 3 |
| 3 |
|
Other | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Ending balance at March 31, | $ | 151 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,996 |
| $ | 2,147 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,046 |
| $ | 1,058 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific(b) | $ | 223 |
| $ | 530 |
| $ | 556 |
| $ | 1,309 |
| | $ | 89 |
| $ | 461 |
| $ | 479 |
| $ | 1,029 |
|
Portfolio-based | 3,231 |
| 14,420 |
| 4,284 |
| 21,935 |
| | 1,572 |
| 4,722 |
| 4,472 |
| 10,766 |
|
PCI | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 1,738 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,738 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 3,454 |
| $ | 14,950 |
| $ | 4,840 |
| $ | 23,244 |
| | $ | 3,399 |
| $ | 5,183 |
| $ | 4,951 |
| $ | 13,533 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 187 |
| $ | 187 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 114 |
| $ | 114 |
|
Portfolio-based | 151 |
| — |
| 1,809 |
| 1,960 |
| | 12 |
| — |
| 932 |
| 944 |
|
Total allowance for lending-related commitments | $ | 151 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,996 |
| $ | 2,147 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,046 |
| $ | 1,058 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Total allowance for credit losses | $ | 3,605 |
| $ | 14,950 |
| $ | 6,836 |
| $ | 25,391 |
| | $ | 3,411 |
| $ | 5,183 |
| $ | 5,997 |
| $ | 14,591 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Memo: | | | | | | | | | |
Retained loans, end of period | $ | 293,779 |
| $ | 154,021 |
| $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 1,003,089 |
| | $ | 322,208 |
| $ | 150,515 |
| $ | 471,118 |
| $ | 943,841 |
|
Retained loans, average | 294,156 |
| 162,660 |
| 491,819 |
| 948,635 |
| | 333,480 |
| 151,120 |
| 471,957 |
| 956,557 |
|
Credit ratios | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans | 1.18 | % | 9.71 | % | 0.87 | % | 2.32 | % | | 1.05 | % | 3.44 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.43 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans(c) | 89 |
| NM |
| 247 |
| 398 |
| | 107 |
| NM |
| 278 |
| 273 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit card | 89 |
| NM |
| 247 |
| 142 |
| | 107 |
| NM |
| 278 |
| 168 |
|
Net charge-off rates | (0.01 | ) | 3.25 |
| 0.13 |
| 0.62 |
| | 0.13 |
| 3.23 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.58 |
|
| |
(a) | Write-offsPrior to the adoption of CECL, write-offs of PCI loans arewere recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceedexceeded estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan iswas recognized when the underlying loan iswas removed from a pool. |
| |
(b) | Includes modified PCD loans and loans that have been modified or are reasonably expected to be modified in a TDR. Also includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR.for the wholesale portfolio segment. The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses modified or reasonably expected to be modified in a TDR is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates. |
| |
(c) | The allowance for lending-related commitments is reported in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(d) | The Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. |
| |
(d) | Excludes HTM securities, which had an allowance for credit losses of $19 million and a provision for credit losses of $9 million as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2020. |
|
| | | | |
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGEMENT |
Investment portfolio risk is the risk associated with the loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments arising from the investment securities portfolio or from principal investments. The investment securities portfolio is predominantly held predominantly by Treasury and CIO in connection with the Firm’s balance sheet or asset-liability management objectives or from principalobjectives. Principal investments are predominantly privately-held financial instruments and are managed in the LOBs and Corporate in predominantly privately-held financial instruments.Corporate. Investments are typically intended to be held over extended periods and, accordingly, the Firm has no expectation for short-term realized gains with respect to these investments.
Investment securities risk
Investment securities risk includes the exposure associated with a default in the payment of principal and interest. This risk is mitigated given that the investment securities portfolio held by Treasury and CIO substantially investis predominantly invested in high-quality securities. At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses, was $392.4$469.1 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available and where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s)risk ratings). Refer to Corporate segment results on pages 42–43page 37 and Note 910 for further information on the investment securities portfolio.portfolio and internal risk ratings. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 70–7467–71 for further information on the market risk inherent in the portfolio. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 50–5445–49 for further information on related liquidity risk.
Principal investment risk
Principal investments are typically private non-traded financial instruments representing ownership or other forms of junior capital. Principal investments span multiple asset classes and are made either in stand-alone investing businesses or as part of a broader business platform. In general, new principal investments include tax-oriented investments, as well as investments made to enhance or accelerate LOB and Corporate strategic business initiatives. The Firm’s principal investments are managed by the LOBs and Corporate and are reflected within their respective financial results. The carrying values of the principal investment portfolios have not been significantly affected by recent market events as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in the event that deterioration of the macroeconomic environment accelerates and/or economic recovery becomes delayed, certain principal investments could be subject to impairments, write-downs, or other negative impacts.
As of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, the aggregate carrying values of the principal investment portfolios were $23.3$23.8 billion and $22.2$24.2 billion, respectively, which included tax-oriented investments (e.g., affordable housing and alternative energy investments) of $16.7$18.2 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively,at the end of both periods, and private equity, various debt and equity instruments, and real assets of $6.6$5.6 billion and $5.6$6.0 billion, respectively.
Refer to page 123118 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s Investment Portfolio Risk Management governance and oversight.
Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 124–131119–126 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s Market Risk Management organization, market risk measurement, risk monitoring and control, and predominant business activities that give rise to market risk.
COVID-19 Pandemic
Market Risk Management is actively monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on market risk exposures by leveraging existing risk measures and controls.
Models used to measure market risk are inherently imprecise and may be limited in their ability to measure certain risks or to predict losses. This imprecision may be heightened when sudden or severe shifts in market conditions occur, such as those observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. For additional discussion on model uncertainty refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 74.
Market Risk Management periodically reviews the Firm’s existing market risk measures to identify opportunities for enhancement, and to the extent appropriate, will calibrate those measures accordingly over time. This is increasingly important in periods of sustained, heightened market volatility.
Value-at-risk
JPMorgan Chase utilizes value-at-risk (“VaR”), a statistical risk measure, to estimate the potential loss from adverse market moves in the current market environment. The Firm has a single VaR framework used as a basis for calculating Risk Management VaR and Regulatory VaR.
The Firm’s Risk Management VaR is calculated assuming a one-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 95% confidence level. For risk management purposes, the Firm believes this methodology provides a daily measure of risk that is closely aligned to risk management decisions made by the lines of businessLOBs and Corporate and, along with other market risk measures, provides the appropriate information needed to respond to risk events. The Firm calculates separately a daily aggregated VaR in accordance with regulatory rules (“Regulatory VaR”), which is used to derive the Firm’s regulatory VaR-based capital requirements under Basel III.
The Firm’s VaR model calculations are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s portfolios, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s modeling techniques and measurements, and other factors. Such changes may affect historical comparisons of VaR results. Refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 140135 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for information regarding model reviews and approvals.
Refer to page 126121 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information regarding VaR, including the inherent limitations, and the key differences between Risk Management VaR and Regulatory VaR. Refer to JPMorgan Chase’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website at:
(http://investor.shareholder.com/jpmorganchase/basel.cfm) for additional information on Regulatory VaR and the other components of market risk regulatory capital for the Firm (e.g., VaR-based measure, stressed VaR-based measure and the respective backtesting). Refer to Other risk measures on pages 129-131124-126 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information regarding nonstatistical market risk measures used by the Firm.
The table below shows the results of the Firm’s Risk Management VaR measure using a 95% confidence level. VaR can vary significantly as positions change, market volatility fluctuates, and diversification benefits change.
| | Total VaR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended |
| Three months ended |
|
| September 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| September 30, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| March 31, 2019 |
|
(in millions) | Avg. | Min | Max |
| Avg. | Min | Max |
| Avg. | Min | Max |
|
| Avg. | Min | Max |
| Avg. | Min | Max |
| Avg. | Min | Max |
|
|
CIB trading VaR by risk type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income | $ | 37 |
|
| $ | 31 |
|
| $ | 46 |
|
|
| $ | 39 |
|
| $ | 33 |
|
| $ | 45 |
|
|
| $ | 30 |
|
| $ | 25 |
|
| $ | 37 |
|
| $ | 60 |
|
| $ | 30 |
|
| $ | 156 |
|
|
| $ | 39 |
|
| $ | 33 |
|
| $ | 48 |
|
|
| $ | 44 |
|
| $ | 38 |
|
| $ | 50 |
|
|
Foreign exchange | 6 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 12 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 15 |
|
|
Equities | 22 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 27 |
|
|
| 25 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 31 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 41 |
|
|
| 18 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 27 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 22 |
|
|
Commodities and other | 8 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 9 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 10 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 24 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 9 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 12 |
|
|
Diversification benefit to CIB trading VaR | (34 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (36 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (27 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) | (40 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (32 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (32 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
CIB trading VaR | 39 |
|
| 33 |
| (b) | 47 |
| (b) |
| 44 |
|
| 34 |
| (b) | 55 |
| (b) |
| 33 |
|
| 27 |
| (b) | 41 |
| (b) | 57 |
|
| 27 |
| (b) | 160 |
| (b) |
| 37 |
|
| 29 |
| (b) | 55 |
| (b) |
| 47 |
|
| 36 |
| (b) | 61 |
| (b) |
Credit portfolio VaR | 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 25 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 6 |
|
|
Diversification benefit to CIB VaR | (6 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (5 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (3 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) | (8 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (5 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (4 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
CIB VaR | 38 |
|
| 33 |
| (b) | 46 |
| (b) |
| 44 |
|
| 35 |
| (b) | 55 |
| (b) |
| 33 |
|
| 28 |
| (b) | 42 |
| (b) | 58 |
|
| 27 |
| (b) | 162 |
| (b) |
| 37 |
|
| 29 |
| (b) | 52 |
| (b) |
| 48 |
|
| 37 |
| (b) | 63 |
| (b) |
| CCB VaR | 6 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 3 |
|
|
Corporate VaR | 10 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 14 |
|
| |
Corporate and other LOB VaR | | 11 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 14 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 13 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 12 |
|
|
Diversification benefit to other VaR | (5 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (5 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (1 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) | (5 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (6 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (2 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
Other VaR | 11 |
|
| 9 |
| (b) | 15 |
| (b) |
| 9 |
|
| 8 |
| (b) | 11 |
| (b) |
| 13 |
|
| 12 |
| (b) | 14 |
| (b) | 13 |
|
| 10 |
| (b) | 16 |
| (b) |
| 13 |
|
| 10 |
| (b) | 17 |
| (b) |
| 10 |
|
| 9 |
| (b) | 11 |
| (b) |
Diversification benefit to CIB and other VaR | (10 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (7 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (11 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) | (12 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (13 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
| (6 | ) | (a) | NM |
| (b) | NM |
| (b) |
Total VaR | $ | 39 |
|
| $ | 35 |
| (b) | $ | 46 |
| (b) |
| $ | 46 |
|
| $ | 36 |
| (b) | $ | 57 |
| (b) |
| $ | 35 |
|
| $ | 30 |
| (b) | $ | 43 |
| (b) | $ | 59 |
|
| $ | 27 |
| (b) | $ | 164 |
| (b) |
| $ | 37 |
|
| $ | 30 |
| (b) | $ | 52 |
| (b) |
| $ | 52 |
|
| $ | 40 |
| (b) | $ | 65 |
| (b) |
| |
(a) | Average portfolio VaR is less than the sum of the VaR of the components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects that the risks are not perfectly correlated. |
| |
(b) | Diversification benefit represents the difference between the total VaR and each reported level and the sum of its individual components. Diversification benefit reflects the non-additive nature of VaR due to imperfect correlation across lines of business,LOBs, Corporate, and risk types. The maximum and minimum VaR for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the components and consequently diversification benefit is not meaningful. |
Average VaR across the risk types and LOBs were generally higher due to increased volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Quarter over quarter results
Average total VaR decreasedincreased by $7$22 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 as compared with the prior quarter. This reflects a reductionsubstantial increases in volatility which occurred towards the end of the quarter, affecting the fixed income risk acrosstype. Maximum VaR for the Fixed Income and Foreign Exchange risk types, as well as a decrease in the Equities risk typequarter was $164 million, also driven by certain CIB investments, including Tradeweb.the increased volatility.
Year over year results
Average total VaR increased by $4$7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, compared with the same period in the prior year. TheThis reflects an increase in average total VaR is primarily due tothe fixed income risk type driven by substantial increases in volatility, and increased exposure in the Fixed Incomeequities risk type as well as an increase in the Equities risk type in CIB driven bydue to the inclusion of Tradeweb following theits IPO in the second quarter of 2019.2019, partially offset by the exit of certain CIB investments. The fixed income and equities risk type increases were partially offset by reduced exposure in the foreign exchange risk type.
In addition, average CCB VaR has increased by $5 million, driven by mortgage servicing rightsMSR risk management activities.
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm refined the scope of VaR to exclude positions related to the risk management of interest rate exposure from changes in the Firm’s own credit spread on fair value option elected liabilities, and included these positions in other sensitivity-based measures. This change was made to more appropriately align the risk from changes in the Firm’s own credit spread on fair value option elected liabilities in a single market risk measure. In the absence of this refinement, the average Total VaR for the three months ended March 31, 2020 would have been higher by $6 million and each of the components would have been higher by the amounts reported in the following table:
|
| | | | | |
(in millions) | Amount by which reported VaR would have been higher for the three months ended March 31, 2020 |
CIB fixed income VaR | | $ | 4 |
| |
CIB trading VaR | | 5 |
| |
CIB VaR | | 6 |
| |
VaR back-testingbacktesting
The Firm performs daily VaR model back-testing,backtesting, which compares the daily Risk Management VaR results with the daily gains and losses actually recognized on market-risk related revenue.
that are utilized for VaR backtesting purposes. The Firm’s definition of market risk-related gains and losses is consistentin the chart below do not reflect the Firm’s revenue results as they exclude select components of total net revenue, such as those associated with the definition used by the banking regulators under Basel III. Under this definition market risk-related gainsexecution of new transactions (i.e., intraday client-driven trading and losses are defined as: gains and losses on the positions included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR excludingintraday risk management activities), fees, commissions, certain valuation adjustments and net interest income, andincome. These excluded components of total net revenue may more than offset backtesting gains and losses arising from intraday trading.on a particular day. The definition of backtesting gains and losses above is consistent with the requirements for backtesting under Basel III capital rules.
The following chart compares actualFirmwide daily market risk-relatedbacktesting gains and losses with the Firm’s Risk Management VaR for the nine12 months ended September 30, 2019. As the chart presents market risk-related gains and losses related to those positions included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, theMarch 31, 2020. The results in the tablechart below differ from the results of back-testingbacktesting disclosed in the Market Risk section of the Firm’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are based on Regulatory VaR applied to CIB’sthe Firm’s covered positions.
For the nine12 months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, the Firm observed five15 VaR back-testingbacktesting exceptions and posted market risk-relatedbacktesting gains on 116140 of the 194260 days. ForThe Firm observed eight VaR backtesting exceptions, due to volatility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and posted backtesting gains on 44 of the 64 days, for three months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020. The number of VaR backtesting exceptions observed can differ from the Firm observed threestatistically expected number of backtesting exceptions if the current level of market volatility is materially different from the level of market volatility during the 12 months of historical data used in the VaR back-testing exceptionscalculation. Firmwide backtesting loss days differ from the two loss days for which Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets posted market risk-relatedlosses, as disclosed in the CIB Markets revenue results, as the population of positions which compose each metric are different and due to the exclusion of select components of total net revenue in backtesting gains and losses as described above. For more information on 35 of the 66 days.CIB Markets revenue results, refer to page 29.
Daily Market Risk-Related Gains and Losses
vs. Risk Management VaR (1-day, 95% Confidence level)Backtesting Results
Nine12 months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020
Market Risk-RelatedBacktesting Gains and LossesRisk Management VaR(1-day, 95% Confidence level) |
| | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter 2019 | Third Quarter 2019 | Fourth Quarter 2019 | First Quarter 2019 | Second Quarter 2019 | Third Quarter 20192020 |
Earnings-at-risk
The effect of interest rate exposure on the Firm’s reported net income is important as interest rate risk represents one of the Firm’s significant market risks. Interest rate risk arises not only from trading activities but also from the Firm’s traditional banking activities, which include extension of loans and credit facilities, taking deposits and issuing debt as well as from the investment securities portfolio. Refer to the table on page 125120 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a summary by line of businessLOB and Corporate, identifying positions included in earnings-at-risk.
One way the Firm evaluates its structural interest rate risk is through earnings-at-risk. Earnings-at-risk estimates the Firm’s interest rate exposure for a given interest rate scenario. It is presented as a sensitivity to a baseline, which includes net interest income and certain interest rate sensitive fees. The baseline uses market interest rates and in the case of deposits, pricing assumptions. The Firm conducts simulations of changes to this baseline for interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (“non-U.S. dollar” currencies). These simulations primarily include retained loans, deposits, deposits with banks, investment securities, long term debt and any related interest rate hedges, and exclude other positions in risk management VaR and other sensitivity-based measures as described on page 125120 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K.
Earnings-at-risk scenarios estimate the potential change to a net interest income baseline, over the following 12 months utilizing multiple assumptions. These scenarios include a parallel shift involving changes to both short-term and long-term rates by an equal amount; a steeper yield curve involving holding short-term rates constant and increasing long-term rates or decreasing short-term rates and holding long-term rates constant;rates; and a flatter yield curve involving increasing short-term rates and holding long-term rates constant or holding short-term rates constant and decreasing long-term rates.constant. These scenarios consider many different factors, including:
The impact on exposures as a result of instantaneous changes in interest rates from baseline rates.
Forecasted balance sheet, as well as modeled prepayment and reinvestment behavior, but do not include assumptions about actions that could be taken by the Firm in response to any such instantaneous rate changes. Mortgage prepayment assumptions are based on the interest rates used in the scenarios compared with underlying contractual rates, the time since origination, and other factors which are updated periodically based on historical experience.
| |
• | The pricing sensitivity of deposits, using normalized deposit betas which represent the amount by which deposit rates paid could change upon a given change in market interest rates over the cycle. These normalized deposit betas represent the amount by which deposit rates paid could change upon a given change in market interest |
rates. The deposit rates paid in these scenarios differ from actual deposit rates paid, particularly for retail deposits, due to repricing lags and other factors.
The Firm’s earnings-at-risk scenarios are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s balance sheet, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s simulation and other factors. While a relevant measure of the Firm’s interest rate exposure, the earnings at risk analysis does not represent a forecast of the Firm’s net interest income (Refer to 20192020 Outlook on page 87 for additional information).
The Firm’s U.S. dollar sensitivities are presented in the table below.
| | (in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Parallel shift: | | | | | | |
+100 bps shift in rates | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
| $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
|
-100 bps shift in rates | (2.6 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | |
Steeper yield curve: | | | | | | |
+100 bps shift in long-term rates | 0.9 |
| | 0.5 |
| 1.5 |
| | 1.2 |
|
-100 bps shift in short-term rates | (0.9 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | |
Flatter yield curve: | | | | | | |
+100 bps shift in short-term rates | (0.2 | ) | | 0.4 |
| 1.4 |
| | (0.9 | ) |
-100 bps shift in long-term rates | (1.6 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | |
The change in the Firm’s U.S. dollar sensitivities as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 20182019 reflected updatingupdates to the Firm’s baseline for lower short-term and long-term rates as well as the impact of changes in the Firm’s balance sheet.
The Firm’s sensitivity to an upward shift in short-term and long-term rates decreased as a result of changes in the Firm’s balance sheet primarily offset by updatingreflected updates to the Firm’s baseline to reflectfor lower rates. The Firm’s sensitivity to long-term
Based upon current and implied market rates increased primarily as a result of updating the Firm’s baseline to reflectMarch 31, 2020, scenarios reflecting lower rates could result in negative interest rates. The U.S. has never experienced an interest rate environment where the Federal Reserve has a negative interest rate policy. In a negative rate environment, the modeling assumptions used for certain assets and is more impactful to the downward scenario due to the Firm’s sensitivity to mortgage prepayments.liabilities require additional management judgment.
The Firm’s non-U.S. dollar sensitivities are presented in the table below. | | (in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Parallel shift: | | | | | | |
+100 bps shift in rates | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
|
Flatter yield curve: | | | | | | |
+100 bps shift in short-term rates | 0.5 |
| | 0.5 |
| 0.4 |
| | 0.5 |
|
The results of the non-U.S. dollar interest rate scenario involving a steeper yield curve with long-term rates rising by 100 basis points and short-term rates staying at current levels were not material to the Firm’s earnings-at-risk at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.
Other sensitivity-based measures
The Firm quantifies the market risk of certain investment and funding activities by assessing the potential impact on net revenue and OCIother comprehensive income (“OCI”) due to changes in relevant market variables. Refer to the table Predominant business activities
that give rise to market risk on page 125120 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on the positions captured in other sensitivity-based measures.
The table below represents the potential impact to net revenue or OCI for market risk-sensitive instruments that are not included in VaR or earnings-at-risk. Where appropriate, instruments used for hedging purposes are reported along with the positions being hedged. The sensitivities disclosed in the table below may not be representative of the actual gain or loss that would have been realized at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, as the movement in market parameters across maturities may vary and are not intended to imply management’s expectation of future deteriorationchanges in these sensitivities.
| | Gain/(loss) (in millions) | | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Activity | | Description | | Sensitivity measure | | | | Description | | Sensitivity measure | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment activities(a) | | | | | | | | |
Investment management activities | | Consists of seed capital and related hedges; and fund co-investments | | 10% decline in market value | | $ | (79 | ) | | $ | (102 | ) | | Consists of seed capital and related hedges; and fund co-investments | | 10% decline in market value | | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | (68 | ) |
Other investments | | Consists of privately held equity and other investments held at fair value | | 10% decline in market value | | (202 | ) | | (218 | ) | | Consists of privately held equity and other investments held at fair value | | 10% decline in market value | | (156 | ) | | (192 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Funding activities | | | | | | | | |
Non-USD LTD cross-currency basis | | Represents the basis risk on derivatives used to hedge the foreign exchange risk on the non-USD LTD(b) | | 1 basis point parallel tightening of cross currency basis | | (15 | ) | | (13 | ) | | Represents the basis risk on derivatives used to hedge the foreign exchange risk on the non-USD LTD(b) | | 1 basis point parallel tightening of cross currency basis | | (16 | ) | | (17 | ) |
Non-USD LTD hedges foreign currency (“FX”) exposure | | Primarily represents the foreign exchange revaluation on the fair value of the derivative hedges(b) | | 10% depreciation of currency | | 7 |
| | 17 |
| | Primarily represents the foreign exchange revaluation on the fair value of the derivative hedges(b) | | 10% depreciation of currency | | — |
| | 15 |
|
Derivatives – funding spread risk | | Impact of changes in the spread related to derivatives FVA | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | (5 | ) | | (4 | ) | | Impact of changes in the spread related to derivatives FVA | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) |
Fair value option elected liabilities – funding spread risk | | Impact of changes in the spread related to fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b) | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | 28 |
| | 30 |
| | Impact of changes in the spread related to fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b) | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | 34 |
| | 29 |
|
Fair value option elected liabilities – interest rate sensitivity | | Interest rate sensitivity on fair value option liabilities resulting from a change in the Firm’s own credit spread(b) | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | Interest rate sensitivity on fair value option liabilities resulting from a change in the Firm’s own credit spread(b) | | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | 6 |
| | (2 | ) |
Fair value option elected liabilities – interest rate sensitivity | | | Interest rate sensitivity related to risk management of changes in the Firm’s own credit spread on fair value option liabilities(c)
| | 1 basis point parallel increase in spread | | (6 | ) | | 2 |
|
| |
(a) | Excludes equity securities without readily determinable fair values that are measured under the measurement alternative. Refer to Note 2 for additional information. |
| |
(b) | Impact recognized through OCI. |
| |
(c) | Refer to Total VaR on page 68 for additional information. |
The Firm, through its lines of businessLOBs and Corporate, may be exposed to country risk resulting from financial, economic, political or other significant developments which adversely affect the value of the Firm’s exposures related to a particular country or set of countries. The Country Risk Management group actively monitors the various portfolios which may be impacted by these developments and measures the extent to which the Firm’s exposures are diversified given the Firm’s strategy and risk tolerance relative to a country.
Refer to pages 132–133127–128 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the Firm’s country risk management.
COVID-19 Pandemic
Country Risk Management is actively monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on countries to which the Firm has exposure, leveraging existing stress testing, exposure reporting, controls and tailored analysis.
Risk Reporting
The following table presents the Firm’s top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.) as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and their comparative exposures as of December 31, 2018.2019. The selection of countries represents the Firm’s largest total exposures by country, based on the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, and does not represent the Firm’s view of any actual or potentially adverse credit conditions. Country exposures may fluctuate from period to period due to client activity and market flows.
The overall increase in top 20 exposures was largely driven by client activity and demand for liquidity, relative to the period ending December 31, 2019. This resulted in an increase in cash placements primarily with the central banks of Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia. In addition, the Firm held a larger inventory in Brazilian government bonds.
| | Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a) | Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a) | Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a) |
(in billions) | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018(e) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019(e) |
| Lending and deposits(b) | Trading and investing(c) | Other(d) | Total exposure | | Total exposure | Lending and deposits(b) | Trading and investing(c) | Other(d) | Total exposure | | Total exposure |
Germany | $ | 58.1 |
| $ | 6.2 |
| $ | 0.4 |
| $ | 64.7 |
| | $ | 62.1 |
| $ | 67.9 |
| $ | 7.6 |
| $ | 0.5 |
| $ | 76.0 |
| | $ | 51.6 |
|
United Kingdom | 28.8 |
| 10.0 |
| 3.7 |
| 42.5 |
| | 40.7 |
| 38.2 |
| 12.3 |
| 2.1 |
| 52.6 |
| | 42.4 |
|
Japan | 23.3 |
| 4.2 |
| 0.3 |
| 27.8 |
| | 29.1 |
| 37.6 |
| 9.3 |
| 0.3 |
| 47.2 |
| | 43.8 |
|
China | | 10.3 |
| 12.6 |
| 1.4 |
| 24.3 |
| | 19.2 |
|
France | | 13.0 |
| 8.0 |
| 1.4 |
| 22.4 |
| | 18.1 |
|
Australia | | 14.8 |
| 5.9 |
| — |
| 20.7 |
| | 11.7 |
|
Switzerland | 10.7 |
| 1.0 |
| 7.6 |
| 19.3 |
| | 12.8 |
| 13.3 |
| 0.9 |
| 4.9 |
| 19.1 |
| | 18.3 |
|
France | 11.3 |
| 4.8 |
| 1.5 |
| 17.6 |
| | 17.9 |
| |
China | 9.3 |
| 6.7 |
| 1.4 |
| 17.4 |
| | 19.3 |
| |
Canada | 12.0 |
| 1.5 |
| — |
| 13.5 |
| | 14.3 |
| 11.7 |
| 2.5 |
| 0.1 |
| 14.3 |
| | 13.2 |
|
Brazil | | 4.8 |
| 9.2 |
| — |
| 14.0 |
| | 7.2 |
|
India | 5.0 |
| 4.8 |
| 2.8 |
| 12.6 |
| | 11.8 |
| 4.5 |
| 6.0 |
| 3.1 |
| 13.6 |
| | 11.3 |
|
Luxembourg | 11.6 |
| 0.7 |
| — |
| 12.3 |
| | 11.0 |
| 11.4 |
| 0.7 |
| — |
| 12.1 |
| | 12.9 |
|
Australia | 7.1 |
| 5.0 |
| — |
| 12.1 |
| | 13.0 |
| |
Netherlands | 6.0 |
| 1.2 |
| 3.0 |
| 10.2 |
| | 5.8 |
| 5.4 |
| 1.1 |
| 3.4 |
| 9.9 |
| | 9.0 |
|
Brazil | 4.0 |
| 4.9 |
| — |
| 8.9 |
| | 7.3 |
| |
South Korea | | 4.9 |
| 4.4 |
| 0.5 |
| 9.8 |
| | 6.4 |
|
Singapore | 4.3 |
| 1.6 |
| 2.6 |
| 8.5 |
| | 6.8 |
| 4.5 |
| 2.7 |
| 1.2 |
| 8.4 |
| | 6.8 |
|
Italy | | 2.5 |
| 4.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 7.5 |
| | 6.8 |
|
Hong Kong SAR | | 3.3 |
| 1.9 |
| 1.6 |
| 6.8 |
| | 5.1 |
|
Spain | | 3.4 |
| 2.4 |
| — |
| 5.8 |
| | 5.8 |
|
Saudi Arabia | 7.2 |
| 0.9 |
| — |
| 8.1 |
| | 5.3 |
| 4.4 |
| 1.4 |
| — |
| 5.8 |
| | 5.2 |
|
South Korea | 4.0 |
| 3.6 |
| 0.1 |
| 7.7 |
| | 7.6 |
| |
Italy | 2.2 |
| 4.7 |
| 0.1 |
| 7.0 |
| | 6.4 |
| |
Hong Kong | 3.4 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.7 |
| 6.6 |
| | 5.4 |
| |
Spain | 3.3 |
| 3.3 |
| — |
| 6.6 |
| | 5.1 |
| |
Thailand | | 3.7 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.3 |
| 5.1 |
| | 1.5 |
|
Mexico | 4.2 |
| 0.9 |
| — |
| 5.1 |
| | 5.5 |
| 3.9 |
| 0.7 |
| — |
| 4.6 |
| | 4.7 |
|
Belgium | 3.6 |
| 0.5 |
| — |
| 4.1 |
| | 2.3 |
| |
| |
(a) | Top 20 countryCountry exposures presented in the table reflect approximately 87% and 86% of total firmwide non-U.S. exposure, where exposure is attributed to a specific country at September 30, 2019,both March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018 respectively.2019. |
| |
(b) | Lending and deposits includes loans and accrued interest receivable (net of eligible collateral and the allowance for loan losses), deposits with banks (including central banks), acceptances, other monetary assets, issued letters of credit net of participations, and unused commitments to extend credit. Excludes intra-day and operating exposures, such as those from settlement and clearing activities. |
| |
(c) | Includes market-making inventory, AFS securities, and counterparty exposure on derivative and securities financings net of eligible collateral and hedging. Includes exposure from single reference entity (“single-name”), index and other multiple reference entity transactions for which one or more of the underlying reference entities is in a country listed in the above table. |
| |
(d) | Predominantly includes physical commodity inventory. |
| |
(e) | The country rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2018,2019, are based on the country rankings of the corresponding exposures at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2018.2019. |
|
| | | | |
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT |
Operational risk is the risk associated with an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems; it includes compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk. Operational risk is inherent in the Firm’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways, including fraudulent acts, business interruptions, cybersecurity attacks, inappropriate employee behavior, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or failure of vendors to perform in accordance with their agreements. Operational Risk Management attempts to manage operational risk at appropriate levels in light of the Firm’s financial position, the characteristics of its businesses, and the markets and regulatory environments in which it operates. Refer to Operational Risk Management on pages 129-131 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s Operational Risk Management.
Subcategories and examples of operational risks
Operational risk can manifest itself in various ways. Operational risk subcategories such as Compliance risk, Conduct risk, Legal risk, and Estimations and Model risk as well as other operational risks, can lead to losses which are captured through the Firm’s operational risk measurement processes. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 132, Conduct Risk Management on page 133, Legal Risk Management on page 134 and Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 135 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K for more information. Details on other select examples of operational risks are provided below.
Business and Technology Resiliency Risk
Business disruptions can occur due to forces beyond the Firm’s control such as severe weather, power or telecommunications loss, accidents, failure of a third party to provide expected services, cyberattack, flooding, transit strikes, terrorism, health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases or pandemics. The safety of the Firm’s employees and customers is of the highest priority. The Firmwide resiliency program is intended to enable the Firm to recover its critical business functions and supporting assets (i.e., staff, technology and facilities) in the event of a business interruption. The program includes governance, awareness training, and testing of recovery strategies, as well as strategic and tactical initiatives to identify, assess, and manage business interruption and public safety risks. The strength and proficiency of the Firmwide resiliency program has played an integral role in maintaining the Firm’s business operations during and after various events.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The Firm’s Technology and Cybersecurity operations continue to monitor the Firm’s systems 24 hours a day, seven days a week including responding to threat activity using COVID-19 themes in phishing and other social engineering campaigns.
The Technology function is actively supporting the Firm’s response to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the Firm’s expanded use of remote collaboration tools and platforms. Technology diligently monitors the operational performance of the Firm’s infrastructure to support increased market volumes as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
|
ESTIMATIONS AND MODEL RISK MANAGEMENT
|
Estimations and Model risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused estimation outputs.
The Firm uses models and other analytical and judgment based estimations across various businesses and functions. The estimation methods are of varying levels of sophistication and are used for many purposes, such as the valuation of positions, measurement of risk, sizing the allowance for credit losses, assessing regulatory capital requirements, conducting stress testing, and making business decisions.
While models are inherently imprecise, the degree of imprecision or uncertainty can be heightened by the market or economic environment. This is particularly true when the current and forecasted environment is significantly different from the historical macroeconomic environments upon which the models were calibrated, as the Firm has experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. This uncertainty may necessitate a greater degree of judgment and analytics to inform adjustments to model outputs than in typical periods.
Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 75–77 and Note 2 of this Form 10-Q, and Estimations and Model Risk Management section on page 135 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K for a summary of model-based valuations and other valuation techniques.
|
| | | | |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES USED BY THE FIRM |
JPMorgan Chase’s accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its reported results. The Firm’s most complex accounting estimates require management’s judgment to ascertain the appropriate carrying value of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that estimation methods, including any judgments made as part of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period to period. The methods used and judgments made reflect, among other factors, the nature of the assets or liabilities and the related business and risk management strategies, which may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for determining the carrying value of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief description of the Firm’s critical accounting estimates involving significant judgments.
Allowance for credit losses
The Firm’s allowance for credit losses coversrepresents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the retained consumer and wholesale loan portfolios, as well asremaining expected life of the Firm’s wholesalefinancial assets measured at amortized cost, certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments and certain consumer lending-related commitments. investment securities. The allowance for credit losses comprises:
The allowance for loan losses, is intended to adjust the carrying value ofwhich covers the Firm’s retained loan assets to reflect probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Similarly, theportfolios (scored and risk-rated),
The allowance for lending-related commitments, is established to cover probable credit losses inherent in the lending-related commitments portfolio as of the balance sheet date.and
The allowance for credit losses includes a formula-based component, an asset-specific component,on investment securities, which covers the Firm’s HTM and a component related to PCI loans. AFS securities.
The determination of each of these componentsallowance for credit losses involves significant judgment on a number of matters. Refer to pages 120–122, page 141Note 10 and Note 13 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on these components, areas of judgmentthe Firm’s policies, methodologies, and methodologiesjudgments used in establishingto determine the Firm’s allowance for credit losses; and refer to Allowance for credit losses on pages 67–68 and Note 12losses.
One of this Form 10-Q.
As notedthe most significant judgments involved in the discussion on page 141 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K,estimating the Firm’s allowance for credit losses is sensitiverelates to numerous factors, which may differ depending on the portfolio. Changes inmacroeconomic forecasts used to estimate credit losses over the eight-quarter forecast period within the Firm’s methodology. In light of the rapidly evolving economic conditions orand forecasts during March 2020, management updated its macroeconomic forecast near the end of its credit loss estimation process in early April. However, changes in the Firm’s assumptions and estimates regarding economic conditions could significantly affect its estimate of probableexpected credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The Firm uses its best judgmentdate or lead to assess these economic conditions and loss data in estimating the allowance for credit losses and these estimates are subject to periodic refinement based on changes to underlying external or Firm-specific historical data. Refer to Note 12 for further information.
To illustrate the potential magnitude of certain alternate judgments, the Firm estimates thatsignificant changes in the following inputs would haveestimate from one reporting period to the following effects onnext.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a weak labor market and weak overall economic conditions that will affect borrowers across the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates asconsumer and wholesale lending portfolios, and significant judgment is required to estimate the severity and duration of September 30, 2019,the current economic
without consideration of any offsetting or correlated effects of other inputs indownturn, as well as its potential impact on borrower defaults and loss severities. In particular, macroeconomic conditions and forecasts regarding the Firm’s allowance for loan losses:
A combined 5% decline in housing pricesduration and a 100 basis point increase in unemployment rates from expectations could imply:
| |
◦ | an increase to modeled credit loss estimates of approximately $250 million for PCI loans. |
| |
◦ | an increase to modeled annual credit loss estimates of approximately $50 million for residential real estate loans, excluding PCI loans. |
For credit card loans, a 100 basis point increase in unemployment rates from expectations could imply an increase to modeled annual credit loss estimates of approximately $800 million.
An increase in probability of default (“PD”) factors consistent with a one-notch downgrade in the Firm’s internal risk ratings for its entire wholesale loan portfolio could imply an increase in the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates of approximately $1.7 billion.
A 100 basis point increase in estimated loss given default (“LGD”) for the Firm’s entire wholesale loan portfolio could imply an increase in the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates of approximately $175 million.
The purpose of these sensitivity analyses is to provide an indicationseverity of the isolated impacts of hypothetical alternative assumptions on modeled loss estimates. Theeconomic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have been rapidly changing and remain highly uncertain, and it is difficult to predict exactly how borrower behavior will be impacted by these changes in economic conditions. The effectiveness of government support, customer relief and enhanced unemployment benefits should act as mitigants to credit losses, but the inputs presented above are not intended to imply management’s expectationextent of future deterioration of those risk factors. In addition, these analyses are not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for loan losses, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these modeled loss estimates based on then-current circumstances and conditions.mitigation impact remains uncertain.
It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in specific factorsany one factor or input might affect the overall allowance for credit losses because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for credit losses. Changes in thesethe factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types, and changes in factors and input may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in other factors. In addition, it is difficultothers.
However, to predict how changesconsider the impact of a hypothetical alternate macroeconomic forecast, the Firm compared the modeled credit losses determined using two of the five different macroeconomic scenarios considered in specific economic conditions or assumptions could affect borrower behavior or other factors considered by managementthe quantitative calculations used in estimating the allowanceallowances for credit losses. Givenloan losses and lending-related commitments. Each scenario included a full suite of macroeconomic variables, but differed in the processlevels, paths and peaks of those variables over the Firm followseight-quarter forecast period. The maximum difference in macroeconomic variables between the two scenarios over the eight-quarter forecast period was represented by an approximate 3.5% deterioration in U.S. real GDP, an approximate 250 basis point increase in the U.S. unemployment rate, and an approximate 10.5% deterioration in the judgments madenational house price index.
This analysis is not intended to estimate expected future changes in evaluating the risk factors related to its loss estimates, management believes that its current estimate of the allowance for credit losses, for a number of reasons, including:
the changes in the macroeconomic variables are not intended to imply management’s expectation of the extent or nature of future deterioration in macroeconomic variables
the impacts of changes in many macroeconomic variables are both interrelated and nonlinear, so the results of this analysis cannot be simply extrapolated for more severe changes in macroeconomic variables
the COVID-19 pandemic has stressed many macroeconomic variables at a speed and to degrees not seen in recent history, adding increased uncertainty around credit loss estimates
significant changes in the expected severity and duration of the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the effects of government support and
customer relief, and the speed of the subsequent recovery could significantly affect the Firm’s estimate of expected credit losses irrespective of the estimated sensitivities described below
To demonstrate the sensitivity of credit loss estimates to macroeconomic forecasts, the difference between these two scenarios would have generated the following effects on the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates as of March 31, 2020, without considering any offsetting or correlated effects in other components of the Firm’s allowance for credit losses for these lending exposures:
An increase of approximately $0.9 billion for residential real estate loans and lending-related commitments
An increase of approximately $1.5 billion for credit card loans
An increase of approximately $0.8 billion for wholesale loans and lending-related commitments
This analysis relates only to the modeled credit loss estimates and is appropriate.not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for credit losses as they do not reflect any potential changes in the adjustment to the quantitative calculation, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled lifetime loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these modeled lifetime loss estimates based on then-current circumstances and conditions.
Recognizing that forecasts of macroeconomic conditions are inherently uncertain, particularly in light of the recent economic conditions, the Firm believes that its process to consider the available information and associated risks and uncertainties is appropriately governed and that its estimates of expected credit losses were reasonable and appropriate for the period ended March 31, 2020.
Fair value
JPMorgan Chase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The majority of such assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including, derivatives, structured note products and certain securities financing agreements. Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including certain mortgage, home equity and other loans, where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.
Assets measured at fair value
The following table includes the Firm’s assets measured at fair value and the portion of such assets that are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
| | September 30, 2019 (in billions, except ratios) | Total assets at fair value | | Total level 3 assets | |
March 31, 2020 (in billions, except ratios) | | Total assets at fair value | | Total level 3 assets |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
| | $ | 235.9 |
| | $ | — |
|
Securities borrowed | | 51.6 |
| | — |
|
Trading assets: | | | | |
Trading–debt and equity instruments | $ | 440.2 |
| | | $ | 4.4 |
| $ | 466.9 |
| | $ | 5.5 |
|
Derivative receivables(a) | 55.6 |
| | 5.6 |
| 81.6 |
| | 9.7 |
|
Trading assets | 495.8 |
| | 10.0 |
| |
Total trading assets | | 548.5 |
| | 15.2 |
|
AFS securities | 353.4 |
| | — |
| 399.9 |
| | — |
|
Loans | 5.8 |
| | — |
| 6.2 |
| | 0.3 |
|
MSRs | 4.4 |
| | 4.4 |
| 3.3 |
| | 3.3 |
|
Other | 27.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| 307.6 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 887.2 |
| | $ | 15.1 |
| 1,265.5 |
| | 19.2 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis | 6.4 |
| | 1.0 |
| 3.2 |
| | 0.9 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 893.6 |
| | $ | 16.1 |
| $ | 1,268.7 |
| | $ | 20.1 |
|
Total Firm assets | $ | 2,764.7 |
| | | $ | 3,139.4 |
| | |
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total Firm assets(a) | | | 0.6 | % | | | 0.6 | % |
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value(a) | | | 1.8 | % | | | 1.6 | % |
| |
(a) | For purposes of the table above, the derivative receivables total reflects the impact of netting adjustments; however, the $5.6$9.7 billion of derivative receivables classified as level 3 does not reflect the netting adjustment as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. |
Valuation
Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2.
In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation technique to use. Second, the lack of
observability of certain significant inputs requires management to assess all relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including, for example, transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment rates, default rates, volatilities, correlations, equity or debt prices, valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of the valuation of level 3 instruments, including unobservable inputs used.
For instruments classified in levels 2 and 3, management judgment must be applied to assess the appropriate level of valuation adjustments to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Firm’s creditworthiness, market funding rates, liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and for portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The judgments made are typically affected by the type of product and its specific contractual terms, and the level of liquidity for the product or within the market as a whole. In periods of heightened market volatility and uncertainty, as was experienced in the period ended March 31, 2020, judgments are further affected by the wider variation of reasonable valuation estimates, particularly for positions that are less liquid. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of valuation adjustments applied by the Firm.
Imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios.
The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of methodologies or assumptions different than those used by the Firm could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Refer to Note 2 for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s valuation process and hierarchy, and its determination of fair value for individual financial instruments.
Goodwill impairment
Management applies significant judgment when testing goodwill for impairment. The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units for goodwill impairment testing. Refer to Goodwill impairment on page 142137 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a description of the significant valuation judgments associated with goodwill impairment.
Refer to Note 1415 for additional information on goodwill, including the goodwill impairment assessment as of September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020.
Credit card rewards liability
The credit card rewards liability was $6.3$6.7 billion and $5.8$6.4 billion at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, and is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to page 143pages 137-138 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a description of the significant assumptions and judgments associated with the Firm’s credit card rewards liability.
Income taxes
Refer to Income taxes on page 143138 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a description of the significant assumptions, judgments and interpretations associated with the accounting for income taxes.
Litigation reserves
Refer to Note 2425 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 2930 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a description of the significant estimates and judgments associated with establishing litigation reserves.
|
| | | | |
ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS |
|
| | | | |
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Standards Adopted since January 1, 2019 |
| | | | |
Standard | | Summary of guidance | | Effects on financial statements |
| | | | |
Leases
Issued February 2016
| | • Requires lessees to recognize all leases longer than twelve months on the Consolidated balance sheets as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use asset.
• Requires lessees and lessors to classify most leases using principles similar to existing lease accounting, but eliminates the “bright line” classification tests.
• Expands qualitative and quantitative leasing disclosures.
| | • Adopted January 1, 2019.
•
The Firm elected the available practical expedient to not reassess whether existing contracts contain a lease or whether classification or unamortized initial lease costs would be different under the new lease guidance. The Firm elected the modified retrospective transition method, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings without revising prior periods. • Refer to Note 16 for further information.
|
|
| | | | |
FASB Standards Issued but not yet Adopted2020 |
| | | | |
Standard | | Summary of guidance | | Effects on financial statements |
| | | | |
Financial instrumentsInstruments – credit lossesCredit Losses (“CECL”)
Issued June 2016 | | • Replaces existing incurred loss impairment guidance and establishesEstablishes a single allowance framework for all financial assets carriedmeasured at amortized cost which will reflectand certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This framework requires that management’s estimate ofreflects credit losses over the fullinstrument’s remaining expected life of the financial assets and will considerconsiders expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. • Eliminates existing guidance for PCI loans, and requires recognition of the nonaccretable difference as an increase to the allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets purchased with more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination, with a corresponding increase in the recorded investmentamortized cost of the related loans. • Requires inclusion of expected recoveries, limited to the cumulative amount of prior write-offs, when estimating the allowance for credit losses for in scope financial assets (including collateral dependentcollateral-dependent assets). • Amends existing impairment guidance for AFS securities to incorporate an allowance, which will allow for reversals of credit impairments in the event that the credit of an issuer improves. • Requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the reporting period of adoption.
| | • • Required effective date:Adopted January 1, 2020.(a) • The Firm has established a Firmwide, cross-discipline governance structure, which provides implementation oversight. The Firm continues to test and refine its current expected credit loss models that satisfy the requirements of the new standard. Oversight and testing, as well as efforts to meet expanded disclosure requirements, will extend through the remainder of 2019.
•
The Firm expects that the allowance related to the Firm’s loans and commitments will increase as it will cover credit losses over the full remaining expected life of the portfolios. The Firm currently intends to estimate losses over a two-year forecast period using the weighted-average of a range of macroeconomic scenarios (established on a Firmwide basis), and then revert to longer term historical loss experience to estimate losses over more extended periods.• The Firm currently expects the increase in the allowanceRefer to be in the range of $4-6 billion, primarily driven by Card. This estimate is subject toNote 1 for further refinement based on continuing reviews and approvals of models, methodologies and judgments. The ultimate impact will depend upon the nature and characteristics of the Firm’s portfolio at the adoption date, the macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at that date, and other management judgments.•
The Firm plans to adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2020.information. |
Goodwill Issued January 2017 | | • Requires recognition of an impairment loss to be recognized when the estimated fair value of a reporting unit falls below its carrying value. • Eliminates the second condition in the current guidancerequirement that requires an impairment loss to be recognized only if the estimated implied fair value of the goodwill is below its carrying value. | | • • Required effective date:Adopted January 1, 2020.• (a)No impact upon adoption as the guidance is to be applied prospectively.• Refer to Note 15 for further information. |
Reference Rate Reform Issued March 2020
| | • Provides optional expedients and exceptions to current accounting guidance when financial instruments, hedging relationships, and other transactions are amended due to reference rate reform. • Based on current impairment test results,Provides an election to account for certain contract amendments related to reference rate reform as modifications rather than extinguishments without the Firm does not expect a material effect onrequirement to assess the Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the impactsignificance of the newamendments. • Allows for changes in critical terms of a hedging relationship without automatic termination of that relationship. Provides various practical expedients and elections designed to allow hedge accounting guidance will depend onto continue uninterrupted during the performancetransition period. • Provides a one-time election to transfer securities out of the reporting unitsheld-to-maturity classification if certain criteria are met. | | • Issued and the market conditions at the time of adoption.effective March 12, 2020.• After adoption, the guidance may result in more frequent goodwill impairment losses due The Firm expects to the removalapply certain of the second condition.practical expedients related to contract modifications and hedge accounting relationships and is evaluating the timing and application of those elections. • The Firm plans to adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2020.
|
| |
(a) | Early adoption is permitted. |
|
| | | | |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “believe,” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide JPMorgan Chase’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorgan Chase’s disclosures in this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, the Firm’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to investors, analysts, representatives of the media and others.
All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Firm’s control. JPMorgan Chase’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements:
Economic, financial and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic;
Local, regional and global business, economic and political conditions and geopolitical events;
Changes in laws and regulatory requirements, including capital and liquidity requirements affecting the Firm’s businesses, and the ability of the Firm to address those requirements;
Heightened regulatory and governmental oversight and scrutiny of JPMorgan Chase’s business practices, including dealings with retail customers;
Changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws;
Changes in income tax laws and regulations;
Securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and volatility;
Changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior;
Ability of the Firm to manage effectively its capital and liquidity, including approval of its capital plans by banking regulators;
Changes in credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries;
Damage to the Firm’s reputation;
Ability of the Firm to appropriately address social and environmental and sustainability concerns that may arise from its business activities;
Ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or market disruption, including, but not limited to, in the interest rate environment;
Technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors;
The effectiveness of the Firm’s control agenda;
Ability of the Firm to develop or discontinue products and services, and the extent to which products or services previously sold by the Firm (including but not limited to mortgages and asset-backed securities) require the Firm to incur liabilities or absorb losses not contemplated at their initiation or origination;
Acceptance of the Firm’s new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the ability of the Firm to innovate and to increase market share;
Ability of the Firm to attract and retain qualified employees;
Ability of the Firm to control expenses;
Competitive pressures;
Changes in the credit quality of the Firm’s clients, customers and counterparties;
Adequacy of the Firm’s risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;
Adverse judicial or regulatory proceedings;
Changes in applicable accounting policies, including the introduction of new accounting standards;
Ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities;
Occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities, including health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics or conflictsoutbreaks of hostilities, or the effects of climate change, and the Firm’s ability to deal effectively with disruptions caused by the foregoing;
Ability of the Firm to maintain the security of its financial, accounting, technology, data processing and other operational systems and facilities;
Ability of the Firm to withstand disruptions that may be caused by any failure of its operational systems or those of third parties;
Ability of the Firm to effectively defend itself against cyberattacks and other attempts by unauthorized parties to access information of the Firm or its customers or to disrupt the Firm’s systems; and
The other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I,II,
Item 1A: Risk Factors in this form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K.
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are made, and JPMorgan Chase does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the Firm may make in any subsequent Form 10-Ks, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qs, or Current Reports on Form 8-K.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated statements of income (unaudited)
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share data) | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment banking fees | | $ | 1,967 |
| | $ | 1,832 |
| | $ | 5,658 |
| | $ | 5,736 |
| | $ | 1,866 |
| | $ | 1,840 |
|
Principal transactions | | 3,449 |
| | 2,964 |
| | 11,239 |
| | 10,698 |
| | 2,937 |
| | 4,076 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees(a) | | 1,626 |
| | 1,542 |
| | 4,643 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 1,706 |
| | 1,559 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions(a) | | 4,351 |
| | 4,310 |
| | 12,818 |
| | 12,923 |
| | 4,540 |
| | 4,037 |
|
Investment securities gains/(losses) | | 78 |
| | (46 | ) | | 135 |
| | (371 | ) | |
Investment securities gains | | | 233 |
| | 13 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income | | 887 |
| | 262 |
| | 1,562 |
| | 1,051 |
| | 320 |
| | 396 |
|
Card income | | 1,283 |
| | 1,328 |
| | 3,923 |
| | 3,623 |
| | 1,054 |
| | 1,274 |
|
Other income | | 1,472 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 4,239 |
| | 4,041 |
| | 1,156 |
| | 1,475 |
|
Noninterest revenue | | 15,113 |
| | 13,352 |
| | 44,217 |
| | 42,215 |
| | 13,812 |
| | 14,670 |
|
Interest income (a) | | 21,121 |
| | 19,439 |
| | 64,113 |
| | 55,499 |
| | 19,161 |
| | 21,389 |
|
Interest expense (a) | | 6,893 |
| | 5,531 |
| | 21,034 |
| | 14,794 |
| | 4,722 |
| | 6,936 |
|
Net interest income | | 14,228 |
| | 13,908 |
| | 43,079 |
| | 40,705 |
| | 14,439 |
| | 14,453 |
|
Total net revenue | | 29,341 |
| | 27,260 |
| | 87,296 |
| | 82,920 |
| | 28,251 |
| | 29,123 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | | 1,514 |
| | 948 |
| | 4,158 |
| | 3,323 |
| | 8,285 |
| | 1,495 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation expense | | 8,583 |
| | 8,108 |
| | 26,067 |
| | 25,308 |
| | 8,895 |
| | 8,937 |
|
Occupancy expense | | 1,110 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 3,238 |
| | 2,883 |
| | 1,066 |
| | 1,068 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment expense | | 2,494 |
| | 2,219 |
| | 7,236 |
| | 6,441 |
| | 2,578 |
| | 2,364 |
|
Professional and outside services | | 2,056 |
| | 2,086 |
| | 6,307 |
| | 6,333 |
| | 2,028 |
| | 2,039 |
|
Marketing | | 945 |
| | 798 |
| | 2,686 |
| | 2,396 |
| | 859 |
| | 879 |
|
Other expense | | 1,234 |
| | 1,398 |
| | 3,624 |
| | 4,313 |
| | 1,424 |
| | 1,108 |
|
Total noninterest expense | | 16,422 |
| | 15,623 |
| | 49,158 |
| | 47,674 |
| | 16,850 |
| | 16,395 |
|
Income before income tax expense | | 11,405 |
| | 10,689 |
| | 33,980 |
| | 31,923 |
| | 3,116 |
| | 11,233 |
|
Income tax expense | | 2,325 |
| | 2,309 |
| | 6,069 |
| | 6,515 |
| | 251 |
| | 2,054 |
|
Net income | | $ | 9,080 |
| | $ | 8,380 |
| | $ | 27,911 |
| | $ | 25,408 |
| | $ | 2,865 |
| | $ | 9,179 |
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders | | $ | 8,606 |
| | $ | 7,948 |
| | $ | 26,551 |
| | $ | 24,067 |
| | $ | 2,431 |
| | $ | 8,753 |
|
Net income per common share data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 2.69 |
| | $ | 2.35 |
| | $ | 8.17 |
| | $ | 7.04 |
| | $ | 0.79 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | | 2.68 |
| | 2.34 |
| | 8.15 |
| | 7.00 |
| | 0.78 |
| | 2.65 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average basic shares | | 3,198.5 |
| | 3,376.1 |
| | 3,248.7 |
| | 3,416.5 |
| | 3,095.8 |
| | 3,298.0 |
|
Weighted-average diluted shares | | 3,207.2 |
| | 3,394.3 |
| | 3,258.0 |
| | 3,436.2 |
| | 3,100.7 |
| | 3,308.2 |
|
| |
(a) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm implemented certain presentation changes that impacted interest income and interest expense, but had no effect on net interest income. These changes were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period(a) In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and commissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 6 for additional information. |
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (unaudited)
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Net income | | $ | 9,080 |
| | $ | 8,380 |
| | $ | 27,911 |
| | $ | 25,408 |
| $ | 2,865 |
| | $ | 9,179 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss), after–tax | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | 479 |
| | (819 | ) | | 2,986 |
| | (2,280 | ) | 1,119 |
| | 1,414 |
|
Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | (165 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (90 | ) | | 84 |
| (330 | ) | | (24 | ) |
Fair value hedges | | (1 | ) | | 34 |
| | 87 |
| | (74 | ) | 88 |
| | 2 |
|
Cash flow hedges | | 195 |
| | (88 | ) | | 430 |
| | (327 | ) | 2,465 |
| | 138 |
|
Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | | 46 |
| | 19 |
| | 123 |
| | 78 |
| 33 |
| | 36 |
|
DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | | 132 |
| | (402 | ) | | (229 | ) | | 125 |
| 2,474 |
| | (617 | ) |
Total other comprehensive income/(loss), after–tax | | 686 |
| | (1,287 | ) | | 3,307 |
| | (2,394 | ) | 5,849 |
| | 949 |
|
Comprehensive income | | $ | 9,766 |
| | $ | 7,093 |
| | $ | 31,218 |
| | $ | 23,014 |
| $ | 8,714 |
| | $ | 10,128 |
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated balance sheets (unaudited)
| | (in millions, except share data) | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
Assets | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $ | 21,215 |
| | $ | 22,324 |
| $ | 24,001 |
| | $ | 21,704 |
|
Deposits with banks | 235,382 |
| | 256,469 |
| 343,533 |
| | 241,927 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $13,705 and $13,235 at fair value) | 257,391 |
| | 321,588 |
| |
Securities borrowed (included $5,784 and $5,105 at fair value) | 138,336 |
| | 111,995 |
| |
Trading assets (included assets pledged of $138,827 and $89,073) | 495,875 |
| | 413,714 |
| |
Investment securities (included $353,421 and $230,394 at fair value and assets pledged of $12,518 and $11,432) | 394,251 |
| | 261,828 |
| |
Loans (included $5,760 and $3,151 at fair value) | 945,218 |
| | 984,554 |
| |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $235,859 and $14,561 at fair value) | | 248,580 |
| | 249,157 |
|
Securities borrowed (included $51,576 and $6,237 at fair value) | | 139,839 |
| | 139,758 |
|
Trading assets (included assets pledged of $143,900 and $111,522) | | 548,580 |
| | 411,103 |
|
Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $394,104 and $345,306; included assets pledged of $16,964 and $10,325) | | 399,944 |
| | 350,699 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities (net of allowance for credit losses of $19) | | 71,200 |
| | 47,540 |
|
Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses | | 471,144 |
| | 398,239 |
|
Loans (included $6,214 and $7,104 at fair value) | | 1,015,375 |
| | 959,769 |
|
Allowance for loan losses | (13,235 | ) | | (13,445 | ) | (23,244 | ) | | (13,123 | ) |
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses | 931,983 |
| | 971,109 |
| 992,131 |
| | 946,646 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable | 88,988 |
| | 73,200 |
| 122,064 |
| | 72,861 |
|
Premises and equipment | 25,117 |
| | 14,934 |
| 25,882 |
| | 25,813 |
|
Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets | 53,078 |
| | 54,349 |
| 51,867 |
| | 53,341 |
|
Other assets (included $8,916 and $9,630 at fair value and assets pledged of $2,834 and $3,457) | 123,045 |
| | 121,022 |
| |
Other assets (included $20,675 and $9,111 at fair value and assets pledged of $3,762 and $3,349) | | 171,810 |
| | 126,830 |
|
Total assets(a) | $ | 2,764,661 |
| | $ | 2,622,532 |
| $ | 3,139,431 |
| | $ | 2,687,379 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Deposits (included $29,355 and $23,217 at fair value) | $ | 1,525,261 |
| | $ | 1,470,666 |
| |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $933 and $935 at fair value) | 247,766 |
| | 182,320 |
| |
Short-term borrowings (included $6,497 and $7,130 at fair value) | 48,893 |
| | 69,276 |
| |
Deposits (included $22,609 and $28,589 at fair value) | | $ | 1,836,009 |
| | $ | 1,562,431 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $194,690 and $549 at fair value) | | 233,207 |
| | 183,675 |
|
Short-term borrowings (included $24,320 and $5,920 at fair value) | | 51,909 |
| | 40,920 |
|
Trading liabilities | 138,343 |
| | 144,773 |
| 184,196 |
| | 119,277 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities (included $2,411 and $3,269 at fair value) | 225,063 |
| | 196,710 |
| |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (included $39 and $28 at fair value)
| 18,515 |
| | 20,241 |
| |
Long-term debt (included $71,957 and $54,886 at fair value) | 296,472 |
| | 282,031 |
| |
Accounts payable and other liabilities (included $4,131 and $3,728 at fair value) | | 253,874 |
| | 210,407 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (included $77 and $36 at fair value)
| | 19,630 |
| | 17,841 |
|
Long-term debt (included $68,617 and $75,745 at fair value) | | 299,344 |
| | 291,498 |
|
Total liabilities(a) | 2,500,313 |
| | 2,366,017 |
| 2,878,169 |
| | 2,426,049 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (refer to Notes 22, 23 and 24) |
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments and contingencies (refer to Notes 23, 24 and 25) | |
|
| |
|
|
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | |
Preferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 2,836,250 and 2,606,750 shares) | 28,363 |
| | 26,068 |
| |
Preferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 3,006,250 and 2,699,250 shares) | | 30,063 |
| | 26,993 |
|
Common stock ($1 par value; authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 4,104,933,895 shares) | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 88,512 |
| | 89,162 |
| 87,857 |
| | 88,522 |
|
Retained earnings | 217,888 |
| | 199,202 |
| 220,226 |
| | 223,211 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) | 1,800 |
| | (1,507 | ) | 7,418 |
| | 1,569 |
|
Shares held in restricted stock units (“RSU”) Trust, at cost (472,953 shares) | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | |
Treasury stock, at cost (968,448,971 and 829,167,674 shares) | (76,299 | ) | | (60,494 | ) | |
Shares held in restricted stock units (“RSU”) Trust, at cost (472,953 shares) | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost (1,057,911,018 and 1,020,912,567 shares) | | (88,386 | ) | | (83,049 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 264,348 |
| | 256,515 |
| 261,262 |
| | 261,330 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,764,661 |
| | $ | 2,622,532 |
| $ | 3,139,431 |
| | $ | 2,687,379 |
|
| |
(a) | The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The holders of the beneficial interests generally do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. The assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. Refer to Note 13 for a further discussion. |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The holders of the beneficial interests generally do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. The assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. Refer to Note 14 for a further discussion.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
Assets | | | | | | |
Trading assets | $ | 1,461 |
| | $ | 1,966 |
| $ | 1,935 |
| | $ | 2,633 |
|
Loans | 53,022 |
| | 59,456 |
| 42,471 |
| | 42,931 |
|
All other assets | 974 |
| | 1,013 |
| 991 |
| | 881 |
|
Total assets | $ | 55,457 |
| | $ | 62,435 |
| $ | 45,397 |
| | $ | 46,445 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | $ | 18,515 |
| | $ | 20,241 |
| $ | 19,630 |
| | $ | 17,841 |
|
All other liabilities | 301 |
| | 312 |
| 316 |
| | 447 |
|
Total liabilities | $ | 18,816 |
| | $ | 20,553 |
| $ | 19,946 |
| | $ | 18,288 |
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity (unaudited)
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | | | Nine months ended September 30, | | | Three months ended March 31, | | |
(in millions, except per share data) | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| |
Preferred stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | $ | 26,993 |
| | $ | 26,068 |
| | $ | 26,068 |
| | $ | 26,068 |
| | $ | 26,993 |
| | $ | 26,068 |
| |
Issuance | | 2,250 |
| | 1,696 |
| | 4,100 |
| | 1,696 |
| | 4,500 |
| | 1,850 |
| |
Redemption | | (880 | ) | | — |
| | (1,805 | ) | | — |
| | (1,430 | ) | | (925 | ) | |
Balance at September 30 | | 28,363 |
| | 27,764 |
| | 28,363 |
| | 27,764 |
| |
Balance at March 31 | | | 30,063 |
| | 26,993 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning and end of the period | | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 4,105 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | 88,359 |
| | 89,392 |
| | 89,162 |
| | 90,579 |
| | 88,522 |
| | 89,162 |
| |
Shares issued and commitments to issue common stock for employee shared-based compensation awards, and related tax effects | | 156 |
| | 179 |
| | (604 | ) | | (897 | ) | | (660 | ) | | (949 | ) | |
Other | | (3 | ) | | (238 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (349 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (43 | ) | |
Balance at September 30 | | 88,512 |
| | 89,333 |
| | 88,512 |
| | 89,333 |
| |
Balance at March 31 | | | 87,857 |
| | 88,170 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | 212,093 |
| | 189,881 |
| | 199,202 |
| | 177,676 |
| | 223,211 |
| | 199,202 |
| |
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles | | — |
| | — |
| | 62 |
| | (183 | ) | |
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle | | | (2,650 | ) | | 62 |
| |
Net income | | 9,080 |
| | 8,380 |
| | 27,911 |
| | 25,408 |
| | 2,865 |
| | 9,179 |
| |
Dividends declared: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | | (423 | ) | | (379 | ) | | (1,201 | ) | | (1,167 | ) | | (421 | ) | | (374 | ) | |
Common stock ($0.90 and $0.80 per share and $2.50 and $1.92 per share, respectively) | | (2,862 | ) | | (2,702 | ) | | (8,086 | ) | | (6,554 | ) | |
Balance at September 30 | | 217,888 |
| | 195,180 |
| | 217,888 |
| | 195,180 |
| |
Common stock ($0.90 and $0.80 per share) | | | (2,779 | ) | | (2,632 | ) | |
Balance at March 31 | | | 220,226 |
| | 205,437 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | 1,114 |
| | (1,138 | ) | | (1,507 | ) | | (119 | ) | | 1,569 |
| | (1,507 | ) | |
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 88 |
| |
Other comprehensive income/(loss), after-tax | | 686 |
| | (1,287 | ) | | 3,307 |
| | (2,394 | ) | | 5,849 |
| | 949 |
| |
Balance at September 30 | | 1,800 |
| | (2,425 | ) | | 1,800 |
| | (2,425 | ) | |
Balance at March 31 | | | 7,418 |
| | (558 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares held in RSU Trust, at cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning and end of the period | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock, at cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | (69,428 | ) | | (50,829 | ) | | (60,494 | ) | | (42,595 | ) | | (83,049 | ) | | (60,494 | ) | |
Repurchase | | (6,949 | ) | | (4,416 | ) | | (17,250 | ) | | (14,055 | ) | | (6,397 | ) | | (5,091 | ) | |
Reissuance | | 78 |
| | 265 |
| | 1,445 |
| | 1,670 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 1,296 |
| |
Balance at September 30 | | (76,299 | ) | | (54,980 | ) | | (76,299 | ) | | (54,980 | ) | |
Balance at March 31 | | | (88,386 | ) | | (64,289 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | $ | 264,348 |
| | $ | 258,956 |
| | $ | 264,348 |
| | $ | 258,956 |
| | $ | 261,262 |
| | $ | 259,837 |
| |
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) | | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 27,911 |
| | $ | 25,408 |
| $ | 2,865 |
| | $ | 9,179 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 4,158 |
| | 3,323 |
| 8,285 |
| | 1,495 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 6,229 |
| | 5,716 |
| 2,197 |
| | 2,038 |
|
Deferred tax (benefit)/expense | (440 | ) | | (323 | ) | (1,329 | ) | | 233 |
|
Other | 1,645 |
| | 2,179 |
| 411 |
| | 640 |
|
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale | (53,934 | ) | | (68,235 | ) | (18,552 | ) | | (15,611 | ) |
Proceeds from sales, securitizations and paydowns of loans held-for-sale | 60,510 |
| | 68,214 |
| 18,013 |
| | 23,528 |
|
Net change in: | | | | | | |
Trading assets | (96,125 | ) | | (44,427 | ) | (164,339 | ) | | (123,064 | ) |
Securities borrowed | (26,162 | ) | | (17,344 | ) | 145 |
| | (11,154 | ) |
Accrued interest and accounts receivable | (16,089 | ) | | (11,335 | ) | (49,323 | ) | | 869 |
|
Other assets | (21,181 | ) | | 2,909 |
| (61,893 | ) | | 2,292 |
|
Trading liabilities | 12,774 |
| | 21,580 |
| 97,078 |
| | 13,353 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 19,661 |
| | 26,677 |
| 45,019 |
| | 10,705 |
|
Other operating adjustments | 4,004 |
| | (577 | ) | 651 |
| | 4,617 |
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | (77,039 | ) | | 13,765 |
| |
Net cash (used in) operating activities | | (120,772 | ) | | (80,880 | ) |
Investing activities | | | | | | |
Net change in: | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 64,207 |
| | (19,259 | ) | 1,120 |
| | 22,459 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | |
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities | 2,239 |
| | 2,268 |
| 2,599 |
| | 570 |
|
Purchases | (11,682 | ) | | (8,613 | ) | (205 | ) | | — |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | |
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities | 41,378 |
| | 29,618 |
| 12,420 |
| | 7,613 |
|
Proceeds from sales | 43,460 |
| | 34,322 |
| 50,990 |
| | 22,289 |
|
Purchases | (200,262 | ) | | (46,530 | ) | (131,605 | ) | | (33,244 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment | 52,739 |
| | 20,154 |
| 7,564 |
| | 14,584 |
|
Other changes in loans, net | (25,977 | ) | | (49,755 | ) | (64,925 | ) | | 3,799 |
|
Purchases of assets pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided by the FRBB under the MMLF | | (11,985 | ) | | — |
|
All other investing activities, net | (4,283 | ) | | (1,987 | ) | (1,123 | ) | | (1,769 | ) |
Net cash (used in) investing activities | (38,181 | ) | | (39,782 | ) | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities | | (135,150 | ) | | 36,301 |
|
Financing activities | | | | | | |
Net change in: | | | | | | |
Deposits | 77,147 |
| | 15,274 |
| 297,976 |
| | 26,799 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 65,428 |
| | 22,719 |
| 49,273 |
| | 40,352 |
|
Short-term borrowings | (20,577 | ) | | 12,974 |
| 12,455 |
| | 1,455 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 5,017 |
| | 975 |
| 1,613 |
| | 5,671 |
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | 45,155 |
| | 54,842 |
| 34,851 |
| | 15,560 |
|
Payments of long-term borrowings | (51,936 | ) | | (69,636 | ) | (29,057 | ) | | (12,425 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | 4,100 |
| | 1,655 |
| 4,500 |
| | 1,850 |
|
Redemption of preferred stock | (1,805 | ) | | — |
| (1,430 | ) | | (925 | ) |
Treasury stock repurchased | (17,250 | ) | | (14,055 | ) | (6,517 | ) | | (5,091 | ) |
Dividends paid | (9,056 | ) | | (6,989 | ) | (3,188 | ) | | (3,033 | ) |
All other financing activities, net | (217 | ) | | (1,440 | ) | 1,829 |
| | (778 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 96,006 |
| | 16,319 |
| 362,305 |
| | 69,435 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks and deposits with banks | (2,982 | ) | | (2,509 | ) | (2,480 | ) | | (1,045 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks | (22,196 | ) | | (12,207 | ) | |
Net increase in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks | | 103,903 |
| | 23,811 |
|
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at the beginning of the period | 278,793 |
| | 431,304 |
| 263,631 |
| | 278,793 |
|
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at the end of the period | $ | 256,597 |
| | $ | 419,097 |
| $ | 367,534 |
| | $ | 302,604 |
|
Cash interest paid | $ | 20,790 |
| | $ | 15,144 |
| $ | 4,374 |
| | $ | 7,336 |
|
Cash income taxes paid, net | 3,478 |
| | 2,197 |
| 763 |
| | 534 |
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
Refer to the Glossary of Terms and Acronyms on pages 168–172171–176 for definitions of terms and acronyms used throughout the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Note 1 – Basis of presentation
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan Chase” or “the Firm”), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest banking institutions in the U.S., with operations worldwide. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Refer to Note 2526 for a further discussion of the Firm’s business segments.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. GAAP. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities.
The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could be different from these estimates. In the opinion of management, all normal, recurring adjustments have been included such that this interim financial information is fairly presented.
These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, and related notes thereto, included in JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K.
Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.
Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of JPMorgan Chase and other entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Assets held for clients in an agency or fiduciary capacity by the Firm are not assets of JPMorgan Chase and are not included on the Consolidated balance sheets.
The Firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity.
Refer to Notes 1 and 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further description of JPMorgan Chase’s accounting policies regarding consolidation.
Offsetting assets and liabilities
U.S. GAAP permits entities to present derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral receivables and payables on a net
basis on the Consolidated balance sheets when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. U.S. GAAP also permits securities financing activities to be presented on a net basis when specified conditions are met, including the existence of a legally enforceable master netting agreement. The Firm has elected to net such balances when the specified conditions are met. Refer to Note 1 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on offsetting assets and liabilities.
Income tax expense
Accounting standard adopted January 1, 2020
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“CECL”)
The adoption of this guidance established a single allowance framework for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This framework requires that management’s estimate reflects credit losses over the instrument’s remaining expected life and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. Refer to Note 13 for further information.
The following table presents the impacts to the allowance for credit losses and retained earnings upon adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2020:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
(in billions) | December 31, 2019 | CECL adoption impact | January 1, 2020 |
Allowance for credit losses | | | |
Consumer, excluding credit card(a) | $ | 2.6 |
| $ | 0.4 |
| $ | 3.0 |
|
Credit card | 5.7 |
| 5.5 |
| 11.2 |
|
Wholesale(a) | 6.0 |
| (1.6 | ) | 4.4 |
|
Firmwide | $ | 14.3 |
| $ | 4.3 |
| $ | 18.6 |
|
| | | |
Retained earnings | | | |
Firmwide allowance increase | | $ | 4.3 |
| |
Balance sheet reclassification(b) | | (0.8 | ) | |
Total pre-tax impact | | 3.5 |
| |
Tax effect | | (0.8 | ) | |
Decrease to retained earnings | | $ | 2.7 |
| |
| |
(a) | In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated business banking and auto dealer loans and lending-related commitments held in CCB from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Accordingly, $0.6 billion of the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2019 and $(0.2) billion of the CECL adoption impact were reclassified. |
| |
(b) | Represents the recognition of the nonaccretable difference on purchased credit deteriorated loans and the Firm's election to recognize the reserve for uncollectible accrued interest on credit card loans in the allowance, both of which resulted in a corresponding increase to loans. |
Securities Financing Agreements
As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements. The difference between their carrying amount and fair value was immaterial and was recorded as part of the Firm’s effective tax rate was 20.4% and 17.9%cumulative-effect adjustment. Refer to Note 11 for further information.
Investment securities
Upon adoption, HTM securities are presented net of an allowance for credit losses. The guidance also amended the previous other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model for AFS securities to incorporate an allowance. Refer to Note 10 for further information.
Credit quality disclosures
As a result of the adoption of this guidance, the Firm expanded credit quality disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost particularly within the retained loan portfolios. Refer to Note 12 for further information.
PCD loans
The adoption resulted in a change in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively, and 21.6% and 20.4%accounting for PCI loans, which are considered purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans under CECL. Upon adoption, the Firm recognized the nonaccretable difference on PCD loans in the respective 2018 periods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the effective tax rate reflected the recognition of $1.0 billionallowance, which resulted in tax benefits relateda corresponding increase to loans. PCD loans are subject to the resolutionFirm’s nonaccrual and charge-off policies and are now reported in the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio’s residential real estate loan class. Refer to Note 12 for further information.
Changes in credit portfolio segments and classes
In conjunction with the adoption of certain tax audits, which reducedCECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portoflio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. The Firm also revised its loan classes. Prior- period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 12 for further information.
Accrued interest receivables
As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to continue classifying accrued interest on loans, including accrued but unbilled interest on credit card loans, and investment securities in accrued interest and accounts receivables on the Consolidated balance sheets. For credit card loans, accrued interest is recognized in the loan balances as it is billed, with the related allowance recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest on credit card loans are recognized in the provision for credit losses and charge-offs are recognized by reversing interest income. For other loans and securities, the Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income.
Capital transition provisions
As disclosed in the Firm’s effective tax rate2019 Form 10-K, the Firm initially elected to phase-in the January 1, 2020 (“day 1”) CECL adoption impact to retained earnings of $2.7 billion to CET1 capital, at 25% per year in each of 2020 to 2023. As part of their response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 31, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that provided the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by 3.0%a three-year transition period (“CECL capital transition provisions”). Refer to Note 24 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K22 for further information.
Note 2 – Fair value measurement
Refer to Note 2 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s valuation methodologies for assets, liabilities and lending-related commitments measured at fair value and the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the assets and liabilities reported at fair value as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, by major product category and fair value hierarchy. | | Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis | Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
| Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair value hierarchy |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) |
| Fair value hierarchy |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total fair value |
| |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) | Total fair value |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | — |
| $ | 13,705 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
| $ | 13,705 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 235,859 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 235,859 |
|
Securities borrowed | — |
| 5,784 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| 5,784 |
| — |
| 51,576 |
|
| — |
|
| 51,576 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | — |
| 70,617 |
|
| 811 |
|
| — |
| 71,428 |
| — |
| 87,669 |
|
| 519 |
|
| — |
| 88,188 |
|
Residential – nonagency | — |
| 2,253 |
|
| 24 |
|
| — |
| 2,277 |
| — |
| 2,665 |
|
| 24 |
|
| — |
| 2,689 |
|
Commercial – nonagency | — |
| 1,613 |
|
| 5 |
|
| — |
| 1,618 |
| — |
| 2,250 |
|
| 3 |
|
| — |
| 2,253 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | — |
| 74,483 |
|
| 840 |
|
| — |
| 75,323 |
| — |
| 92,584 |
|
| 546 |
|
| — |
| 93,130 |
|
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a) | 76,953 |
| 9,446 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| 86,399 |
| 91,922 |
| 12,722 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| 104,644 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | — |
| 6,229 |
|
| 627 |
|
| — |
| 6,856 |
| — |
| 6,489 |
|
| 9 |
|
| — |
| 6,498 |
|
Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper | — |
| 2,180 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 2,180 |
| — |
| 3,769 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 3,769 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 38,162 |
| 36,634 |
| | 146 |
| | — |
| 74,942 |
| 37,860 |
| 47,058 |
| | 175 |
| | — |
| 85,093 |
|
Corporate debt securities | — |
| 20,461 |
| | 484 |
| | — |
| 20,945 |
| — |
| 22,192 |
| | 953 |
| | — |
| 23,145 |
|
Loans(b) | — |
| 43,308 |
| | 1,746 |
| | — |
| 45,054 |
| — |
| 42,754 |
| | 3,354 |
| | — |
| 46,108 |
|
Asset-backed securities | — |
| 2,996 |
| | 38 |
| | — |
| 3,034 |
| — |
| 2,739 |
| | 52 |
| | — |
| 2,791 |
|
Total debt instruments | 115,115 |
| 195,737 |
| | 3,881 |
| | — |
| 314,733 |
| 129,782 |
| 230,307 |
| | 5,089 |
| | — |
| 365,178 |
|
Equity securities | 100,829 |
| 249 |
| | 170 |
| | — |
| 101,248 |
| 82,500 |
| 97 |
| | 213 |
| | — |
| 82,810 |
|
Physical commodities(c) | 7,690 |
| 3,075 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 10,765 |
| 4,684 |
| 2,498 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 7,182 |
|
Other | — |
| 13,172 |
| | 332 |
| | — |
| 13,504 |
| — |
| 11,494 |
| | 221 |
| | — |
| 11,715 |
|
Total debt and equity instruments(d) | 223,634 |
| 212,233 |
| | 4,383 |
| | — |
| 440,250 |
| 216,966 |
| 244,396 |
| | 5,523 |
| | — |
| 466,885 |
|
Derivative receivables: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | 1,312 |
| 372,834 |
| | 1,787 |
| | (347,426 | ) | 28,507 |
| 7,333 |
| 392,863 |
| | 2,307 |
| | (365,602 | ) | 36,901 |
|
Credit | — |
| 15,072 |
| | 645 |
| | (14,879 | ) | 838 |
| — |
| 19,252 |
| | 828 |
| | (18,895 | ) | 1,185 |
|
Foreign exchange | 3,681 |
| 158,893 |
| | 558 |
| | (150,451 | ) | 12,681 |
| 288 |
| 242,180 |
| | 1,054 |
| | (224,539 | ) | 18,983 |
|
Equity | — |
| 44,064 |
| | 2,314 |
| | (38,969 | ) | 7,409 |
| — |
| 91,010 |
| | 5,135 |
| | (82,930 | ) | 13,215 |
|
Commodity | — |
| 20,969 |
| | 269 |
| | (15,096 | ) | 6,142 |
| — |
| 37,309 |
| | 346 |
| | (26,291 | ) | 11,364 |
|
Total derivative receivables | 4,993 |
| 611,832 |
| | 5,573 |
| | (566,821 | ) | 55,577 |
| 7,621 |
| 782,614 |
| | 9,670 |
| | (718,257 | ) | 81,648 |
|
Total trading assets(e) | 228,627 |
| 824,065 |
| | 9,956 |
| | (566,821 | ) | 495,827 |
| 224,587 |
| 1,027,010 |
| | 15,193 |
| | (718,257 | ) | 548,533 |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | — |
| 105,581 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 105,581 |
| — |
| 135,620 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 135,620 |
|
Residential – nonagency | — |
| 12,901 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| 12,902 |
| — |
| 15,443 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 15,443 |
|
Commercial – nonagency | — |
| 5,324 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 5,324 |
| — |
| 6,313 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 6,313 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | — |
| 123,806 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| 123,807 |
| — |
| 157,376 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 157,376 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies | 141,529 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 141,529 |
| 150,235 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 150,235 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | — |
| 31,064 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 31,064 |
| — |
| 30,545 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 30,545 |
|
Certificates of deposit | — |
| 74 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 74 |
| — |
| 76 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 76 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 13,604 |
| 8,554 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 22,158 |
| 13,192 |
| 9,569 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 22,761 |
|
Corporate debt securities | — |
| 1,634 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1,634 |
| — |
| 802 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 802 |
|
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | — |
| 27,908 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 27,908 |
| — |
| 30,975 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 30,975 |
|
Other | — |
| 5,247 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 5,247 |
| — |
| 7,174 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 7,174 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | 155,133 |
| 198,287 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| 353,421 |
| 163,427 |
| 236,517 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 399,944 |
|
Loans | — |
| 5,759 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| 5,760 |
| — |
| 5,931 |
| | 283 |
| | — |
| 6,214 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights | — |
| — |
| | 4,419 |
| | — |
| 4,419 |
| — |
| — |
| | 3,267 |
| | — |
| 3,267 |
|
Other assets(e) | 7,467 |
| 37 |
| | 746 |
| | — |
| 8,250 |
| 6,923 |
| 12,724 |
| | 416 |
| | — |
| 20,063 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 391,227 |
| $ | 1,047,637 |
| | $ | 15,123 |
| | $ | (566,821 | ) | $ | 887,166 |
| $ | 394,937 |
| $ | 1,569,617 |
| | $ | 19,159 |
| | $ | (718,257 | ) | $ | 1,265,456 |
|
Deposits | $ | — |
| $ | 25,719 |
| | $ | 3,636 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 29,355 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 19,430 |
| | $ | 3,179 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 22,609 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | — |
| 933 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 933 |
| — |
| 194,690 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 194,690 |
|
Short-term borrowings | — |
| 4,496 |
| | 2,001 |
| | — |
| 6,497 |
| — |
| 22,281 |
| | 2,039 |
| | — |
| 24,320 |
|
Trading liabilities: | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|
Debt and equity instruments(d) | 66,515 |
| 23,970 |
| | 68 |
| | — |
| 90,553 |
| 95,909 |
| 23,139 |
| | 61 |
| | — |
| 119,109 |
|
Derivative payables: | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|
Interest rate | 1,206 |
| 335,401 |
| | 2,106 |
| | (328,490 | ) | 10,223 |
| 8,752 |
| 353,858 |
| | 2,443 |
| | (351,654 | ) | 13,399 |
|
Credit | — |
| 16,100 |
| | 962 |
| | (14,903 | ) | 2,159 |
| — |
| 19,939 |
| | 939 |
| | (18,766 | ) | 2,112 |
|
Foreign exchange | 3,583 |
| 160,760 |
| | 1,399 |
| | (150,726 | ) | 15,016 |
| 283 |
| 253,779 |
| | 1,981 |
| | (232,749 | ) | 23,294 |
|
Equity | — |
| 45,109 |
| | 5,782 |
| | (40,288 | ) | 10,603 |
| — |
| 88,241 |
| | 5,961 |
| | (82,165 | ) | 12,037 |
|
Commodity | — |
| 25,495 |
| | 316 |
| | (16,022 | ) | 9,789 |
| — |
| 39,229 |
| | 771 |
| | (25,755 | ) | 14,245 |
|
Total derivative payables | 4,789 |
| 582,865 |
| | 10,565 |
| | (550,429 | ) | 47,790 |
| 9,035 |
| 755,046 |
| | 12,095 |
| | (711,089 | ) | 65,087 |
|
Total trading liabilities | 71,304 |
| 606,835 |
| | 10,633 |
| | (550,429 | ) | 138,343 |
| 104,944 |
| 778,185 |
| | 12,156 |
| | (711,089 | ) | 184,196 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 2,355 |
| 37 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| 2,411 |
| 3,407 |
| 709 |
| | 15 |
| | — |
| 4,131 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | — |
| 39 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 39 |
| — |
| 77 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 77 |
|
Long-term debt | — |
| 49,608 |
| | 22,349 |
| | — |
| 71,957 |
| — |
| 48,476 |
| | 20,141 |
| | — |
| 68,617 |
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 73,659 |
| $ | 687,667 |
| | $ | 38,638 |
| | $ | (550,429 | ) | $ | 249,535 |
| $ | 108,351 |
| $ | 1,063,848 |
| | $ | 37,530 |
| | $ | (711,089 | ) | $ | 498,640 |
|
| |
| Fair value hierarchy |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) | |
| Fair value hierarchy |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| | Total fair value |
| |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Derivative netting adjustments(f) | | Total fair value |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | — |
| $ | 13,235 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
| | $ | 13,235 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14,561 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| | $ | 14,561 |
|
Securities borrowed | — |
| 5,105 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 5,105 |
| — |
| 6,237 |
|
| — |
|
| | 6,237 |
|
Trading assets: | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Debt instruments: | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | — |
| 76,249 |
|
| 549 |
|
| — |
| | 76,798 |
| — |
| 44,510 |
|
| 797 |
|
| — |
| | 45,307 |
|
Residential – nonagency | — |
| 1,798 |
|
| 64 |
|
| — |
| | 1,862 |
| — |
| 1,977 |
|
| 23 |
|
| — |
| | 2,000 |
|
Commercial – nonagency | — |
| 1,501 |
|
| 11 |
|
| — |
| | 1,512 |
| — |
| 1,486 |
|
| 4 |
|
| — |
| | 1,490 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | — |
| 79,548 |
|
| 624 |
|
| — |
| | 80,172 |
| — |
| 47,973 |
|
| 824 |
|
| — |
| | 48,797 |
|
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a) | 51,477 |
| 7,702 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 59,179 |
| 78,289 |
| 10,295 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 88,584 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | — |
| 7,121 |
|
| 689 |
|
| — |
| | 7,810 |
| — |
| 6,468 |
|
| 10 |
|
| — |
| | 6,478 |
|
Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper | — |
| 1,214 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 1,214 |
| — |
| 252 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 252 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 27,878 |
| 27,056 |
|
| 155 |
|
| — |
| | 55,089 |
| 26,600 |
| 27,169 |
|
| 155 |
|
| — |
| | 53,924 |
|
Corporate debt securities | — |
| 18,655 |
|
| 334 |
|
| — |
| | 18,989 |
| — |
| 17,956 |
|
| 558 |
|
| — |
| | 18,514 |
|
Loans(b) | — |
| 40,047 |
|
| 1,706 |
|
| — |
| | 41,753 |
| — |
| 47,047 |
|
| 1,382 |
|
| — |
| | 48,429 |
|
Asset-backed securities | — |
| 2,756 |
|
| 127 |
|
| — |
| | 2,883 |
| — |
| 2,593 |
|
| 37 |
|
| — |
| | 2,630 |
|
Total debt instruments | 79,355 |
| 184,099 |
|
| 3,635 |
|
| — |
| | 267,089 |
| 104,889 |
| 159,753 |
|
| 2,966 |
|
| — |
| | 267,608 |
|
Equity securities | 71,119 |
| 482 |
|
| 232 |
|
| — |
| | 71,833 |
| 71,890 |
| 244 |
|
| 196 |
|
| — |
| | 72,330 |
|
Physical commodities(c) | 5,182 |
| 1,855 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 7,037 |
| 3,638 |
| 3,579 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 7,217 |
|
Other | — |
| 13,192 |
|
| 301 |
|
| — |
| | 13,493 |
| — |
| 13,896 |
|
| 232 |
|
| — |
| | 14,128 |
|
Total debt and equity instruments(d) | 155,656 |
| 199,628 |
|
| 4,168 |
|
| — |
| | 359,452 |
| 180,417 |
| 177,472 |
|
| 3,394 |
|
| — |
| | 361,283 |
|
Derivative receivables: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Interest rate | 682 |
| 266,380 |
|
| 1,642 |
|
| (245,490 | ) | | 23,214 |
| 721 |
| 311,173 |
|
| 1,400 |
|
| (285,873 | ) | | 27,421 |
|
Credit | — |
| 19,235 |
|
| 860 |
|
| (19,483 | ) | | 612 |
| — |
| 14,252 |
|
| 624 |
|
| (14,175 | ) | | 701 |
|
Foreign exchange | 771 |
| 166,238 |
|
| 676 |
|
| (154,235 | ) | | 13,450 |
| 117 |
| 137,938 |
|
| 432 |
|
| (129,482 | ) | | 9,005 |
|
Equity | — |
| 46,777 |
|
| 2,508 |
|
| (39,339 | ) | | 9,946 |
| — |
| 43,642 |
|
| 2,085 |
|
| (39,250 | ) | | 6,477 |
|
Commodity | — |
| 20,339 |
|
| 131 |
|
| (13,479 | ) | | 6,991 |
| — |
| 17,058 |
|
| 184 |
|
| (11,080 | ) | | 6,162 |
|
Total derivative receivables | 1,453 |
| 518,969 |
|
| 5,817 |
|
| (472,026 | ) | | 54,213 |
| 838 |
| 524,063 |
|
| 4,725 |
|
| (479,860 | ) | | 49,766 |
|
Total trading assets(e) | 157,109 |
| 718,597 |
|
| 9,985 |
|
| (472,026 | ) | | 413,665 |
| 181,255 |
| 701,535 |
|
| 8,119 |
|
| (479,860 | ) | | 411,049 |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | — |
| 68,646 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 68,646 |
| — |
| 110,117 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 110,117 |
|
Residential – nonagency | — |
| 8,519 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 8,520 |
| — |
| 12,989 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 12,990 |
|
Commercial – nonagency | — |
| 6,654 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 6,654 |
| — |
| 5,188 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 5,188 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | — |
| 83,819 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 83,820 |
| — |
| 128,294 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 128,295 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies | 56,059 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 56,059 |
| 139,436 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 139,436 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | — |
| 37,723 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 37,723 |
| — |
| 29,810 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 29,810 |
|
Certificates of deposit | — |
| 75 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 75 |
| — |
| 77 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 77 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 15,313 |
| 8,789 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 24,102 |
| 12,966 |
| 8,821 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 21,787 |
|
Corporate debt securities | — |
| 1,918 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 1,918 |
| — |
| 845 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 845 |
|
Asset-backed securities: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations | — |
| 19,437 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 19,437 |
| — |
| 24,991 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 24,991 |
|
Other | — |
| 7,260 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 7,260 |
| — |
| 5,458 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 5,458 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | 71,372 |
| 159,021 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 230,394 |
| 152,402 |
| 198,296 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 350,699 |
|
Loans | — |
| 3,029 |
|
| 122 |
|
| — |
| | 3,151 |
| — |
| 7,104 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 7,104 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights | — |
| — |
|
| 6,130 |
|
| — |
| | 6,130 |
| — |
| — |
|
| 4,699 |
|
| — |
| | 4,699 |
|
Other assets(e) | 7,810 |
| 195 |
|
| 927 |
|
| — |
| | 8,932 |
| 7,305 |
| 452 |
|
| 724 |
|
| — |
| | 8,481 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 236,291 |
| $ | 899,182 |
|
| $ | 17,165 |
|
| $ | (472,026 | ) | | $ | 680,612 |
| $ | 340,962 |
| $ | 928,185 |
|
| $ | 13,543 |
|
| $ | (479,860 | ) | | $ | 802,830 |
|
Deposits | $ | — |
| $ | 19,048 |
|
| $ | 4,169 |
|
| $ | — |
| | $ | 23,217 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 25,229 |
|
| $ | 3,360 |
|
| $ | — |
| | $ | 28,589 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | — |
| 935 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 935 |
| — |
| 549 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 549 |
|
Short-term borrowings | — |
| 5,607 |
|
| 1,523 |
|
| — |
| | 7,130 |
| — |
| 4,246 |
|
| 1,674 |
|
| — |
| | 5,920 |
|
Trading liabilities: | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Debt and equity instruments(d) | 80,199 |
| 22,755 |
|
| 50 |
|
| — |
| | 103,004 |
| 59,047 |
| 16,481 |
|
| 41 |
|
| — |
| | 75,569 |
|
Derivative payables: | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
| | | |
Interest rate | 1,526 |
| 239,576 |
|
| 1,680 |
|
| (234,998 | ) | | 7,784 |
| 795 |
| 276,746 |
|
| 1,732 |
|
| (270,670 | ) | | 8,603 |
|
Credit | — |
| 19,309 |
|
| 967 |
|
| (18,609 | ) | | 1,667 |
| — |
| 14,358 |
|
| 763 |
|
| (13,469 | ) | | 1,652 |
|
Foreign exchange | 695 |
| 163,549 |
|
| 973 |
|
| (152,432 | ) | | 12,785 |
| 109 |
| 143,960 |
|
| 1,039 |
|
| (131,950 | ) | | 13,158 |
|
Equity | — |
| 46,462 |
|
| 4,733 |
|
| (41,034 | ) | | 10,161 |
| — |
| 47,261 |
|
| 5,480 |
|
| (40,204 | ) | | 12,537 |
|
Commodity | — |
| 21,158 |
|
| 1,260 |
|
| (13,046 | ) | | 9,372 |
| — |
| 19,685 |
|
| 200 |
|
| (12,127 | ) | | 7,758 |
|
Total derivative payables | 2,221 |
| 490,054 |
|
| 9,613 |
|
| (460,119 | ) | | 41,769 |
| 904 |
| 502,010 |
|
| 9,214 |
|
| (468,420 | ) | | 43,708 |
|
Total trading liabilities | 82,420 |
| 512,809 |
|
| 9,663 |
|
| (460,119 | ) | | 144,773 |
| 59,951 |
| 518,491 |
|
| 9,255 |
|
| (468,420 | ) | | 119,277 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 3,063 |
| 196 |
|
| 10 |
|
| — |
| | 3,269 |
| 3,231 |
| 452 |
|
| 45 |
|
| — |
| | 3,728 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | — |
| 27 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
| | 28 |
| — |
| 36 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 36 |
|
Long-term debt | — |
| 35,468 |
|
| 19,418 |
|
| — |
| | 54,886 |
| — |
| 52,406 |
|
| 23,339 |
|
| — |
| | 75,745 |
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 85,483 |
| $ | 574,090 |
|
| $ | 34,784 |
|
| $ | (460,119 | ) | | $ | 234,238 |
| $ | 63,182 |
| $ | 601,409 |
|
| $ | 37,673 |
|
| $ | (468,420 | ) | | $ | 233,844 |
|
| |
(a) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, included total U.S. GSE obligations of $133.6$161.2 billion and $92.3$104.5 billion, respectively, which were mortgage-related. |
| |
(b) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, included within trading loans were $16.1$15.9 billion and $13.2$19.8 billion, respectively, of residential first-lien mortgages, and $4.2$3.0 billion and $2.3$3.4 billion, respectively, of commercial first-lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans include conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell to U.S. GSEs and government agencies of $10.3$8.9 billion and $7.6$13.6 billion, respectively. |
| |
(c) | Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or net realizable value. “Net realizable value” is a term defined in U.S. GAAP as not exceeding fair value less costs to sell (“transaction costs”). Transaction costs for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories are either not applicable or immaterial to the value of the inventory. Therefore, net realizable value approximates fair value for the Firm’s physical commodities |
inventories. When fair value hedging has been applied (or when net realizable value is below cost), the carrying value of physical commodities approximates fair value, because under fair value hedge accounting, the cost basis is adjusted for changes in fair value. Refer to Note 45 for a further discussion of the Firm’s hedge accounting relationships. To provide consistent fair value disclosure information, all physical commodities inventories have been included in each period presented.
| |
(d) | Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions). |
| |
(e) | Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient are not required to be classified in the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the fair values of these investments, which include certain hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and other funds, were $714$659 million and $747$684 million, respectively. Included in these balances at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, were trading assets of $48$47 million and $49$54 million, respectively, and other assets of $666$612 million and $698$630 million, respectively. |
| |
(f) | As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. |
Level 3 valuations
Refer to Note 2 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on the Firm’s valuation process and a detailed discussion of the determination of fair value for individual financial instruments.
The following table presents the Firm’s primary level 3 financial instruments, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those financial instruments, the significant unobservable inputs, the range of values for those inputs and for certain instruments, the weighted or arithmetic averages of such inputs. While the determination to classify an instrument within level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement, level 3 financial instruments typically include observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources) in addition to the unobservable components. The level 1 and/or level 2 inputs are not included in the table. In addition, the Firm manages the risk of the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within levels 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The range of values presented in the table is representative of the highest and lowest level input used to value the significant groups of instruments within a product/instrument classification. Where provided, the weighted averages of the input values presented in the table are calculated based on the fair value of the instruments that the input is being used to value.
In the Firm’s view, the input range, weighted and the weightedarithmetic average valuevalues do not reflect the degree of input uncertainty or an assessment of the reasonableness of the Firm’s estimates and assumptions. Rather, they reflect the characteristics of the various instruments held by the Firm and the relative distribution of instruments within the range of characteristics. For example, two option contracts may have
similar levels of market risk exposure and valuation uncertainty, but may have significantly different implied volatility levels because the option contracts have different underlyings, tenors, or strike prices. The input range and weighted average values will therefore vary from period-to-period and parameter-to-parameter based on the characteristics of the instruments held by the Firm at each balance sheet date.
For the Firm’s derivatives and structured notes positions classified within level 3 at September 30, 2019, interest rate correlation inputs used in estimating fair value were concentrated towards the upper end of the range; equity correlation, equity-FX, and equity-IR correlation inputs were concentrated in the middle of the range; commodity correlation inputs were concentrated in the middle of the range; credit correlation inputs were concentrated towards the lower end of the range; and the interest rate-foreign exchange (“IR-FX”) correlation inputs were distributed across the range. In addition, the interest rate spread volatility inputs used in estimating fair value were distributed across the range; equity volatilities and commodity volatilities were concentrated towards the lower end of the range; and forward commodity prices used in estimating the fair value of commodity derivatives were concentrated towards the upper end of the range. Prepayment speed inputs used in estimating the fair value of interest rate derivatives were concentrated towards the lower end of the range. Recovery rate inputs used in estimating the fair value of credit derivatives were distributed across the range; credit spreads and conditional default rates were concentrated towards the lower end of the range; loss severity inputs were concentrated towards the upper end of the range and price inputs were concentrated towards the lower end of the range.
| | Level 3 inputs(a) | Level 3 inputs(a) | | | | | | | Level 3 inputs(a) | |
September 30, 2019 | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2020 | | March 31, 2020 | |
Product/Instrument | Fair value (in millions) | | Principal valuation technique | Unobservable inputs(g) | Range of input values | Weighted average | | Fair value (in millions) | | Principal valuation technique | Unobservable inputs(g) | Range of input values | Average(i) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities and loans(b) | $ | 1,132 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Yield | 0 | % | – | 19 | % | | 5 | % | $ | 1,142 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Yield | 1% | – | 25% | | 5% |
| | Prepayment speed | 0 | % | – | 22 | % | | 14 | % | | | Prepayment speed | 0% | – | 39% | | 11% |
| | | Conditional default rate | 0 | % | – | 4 | % | | 1 | % | | | Conditional default rate | 0% | – | 30% | | 14% |
| | | Loss severity | 0 | % | – | 100 | % | | 2 | % | | | Loss severity | 0% | – | 100% | | 8% |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and loans(c) | 147 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 0 |
| – | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 80 |
| 509 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $0 | – | $106 | | $92 |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 627 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 68 |
| – | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 97 |
| 9 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $78 | – | $100 | | $97 |
Corporate debt securities | 484 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 4 |
| – | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 79 |
| 953 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $4 | – | $104 | | $71 |
Loans(d) | 194 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Yield | 5 | % | – | 22 | % | | 7 | % | 167 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Yield | 4% | – | 30% | | 7% |
| 1,115 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 12 |
| – | $ | 101 |
| | $ | 78 |
| 2,365 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $5 | – | $100 | | $73 |
Asset-backed securities | 38 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 1 |
| – | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 53 |
| 52 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $1 | – | $94 | | $61 |
Net interest rate derivatives | (388 | ) | | Option pricing | Interest rate spread volatility | 20 | bps | – | 30 | bps | | (192 | ) | | Option pricing | Interest rate volatility | 6% | – | 91% | | 21% |
| | | Interest rate correlation | (28 | )% | – | 96 | % | | | | | Interest rate spread volatility | 16 bps | – | 30 bps | | 23 bps |
| | | IR-FX correlation | 53 | % | – | 60 | % | | | | | Interest rate correlation | (65)% | – | 94% | | 38% |
| 69 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Prepayment speed | 4 | % | – | 30 | % | | | | | IR-FX correlation | (50)% | – | 35% | | 1% |
| | 56 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Prepayment speed | 4% | – | 30% | | 3% |
Net credit derivatives | (353 | ) | | Discounted cash flows | Credit correlation | 30 | % | – | 60 | % | | | (147 | ) | | Discounted cash flows | Credit correlation | 37% | – | 77% | | 50% |
| | | Credit spread | 4 | bps | – | 1,315 | bps | | | | | Credit spread | 8 bps | – | 2,230 bps | | 516 bps |
| | | Recovery rate | 15 | % | – | 70 | % | | | | | Recovery rate | 1% | – | 70% | | 50% |
| | | Conditional default rate | 2 | % | – | 93 | % | | | | | Conditional default rate | 2% | – | 23% | | 11% |
| | | Loss severity | 100% | | | | | Loss severity | 100% | | 100% |
| 36 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 1 |
| – | $ | 115 |
| | | 36 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $1 | – | $115 | | $60 |
Net foreign exchange derivatives | (679 | ) | | Option pricing | IR-FX correlation | (58 | )% | – | 60 | % | | | (784 | ) | | Option pricing | IR-FX correlation | (58)% | – | 70% | | 33% |
| (162 | ) | | Discounted cash flows | Prepayment speed | 9% | | | (143 | ) | | Discounted cash flows | Prepayment speed | 9% | | 9% |
Net equity derivatives | (3,468 | ) | | Option pricing | Equity volatility | 11 | % | – | 82 | % | | | (826 | ) | | Option pricing | Forward equity price(h) | 54% | – | 106% | | 98% |
| | | Equity correlation | 10 | % | – | 98 | % | | | | | Equity volatility | 4% | – | 179% | | 40% |
| | | Equity-FX correlation | (81 | )% | – | 59 | % | | | | | Equity correlation | 25% | – | 100% | | 78% |
| | | Equity-IR correlation | 25 | % | – | 60 | % | | | | | Equity-FX correlation | (77)% | – | 40% | | (17)% |
| | | | Equity-IR correlation | 20% | – | 35% | | 28% |
Net commodity derivatives | (47 | ) | | Option pricing | Forward commodity price | $ | 30 |
| – | $ 61 per barrel | (425 | ) | | Option pricing | Forward industrial metal price | $ 1,166 / MT | – | $ 15,357 / MT | | $ 6,159 / MT |
| | | | Forward power price | $ 12 /MWH | – | $ 53 /MWH | | $ 22 /MWH |
| | | Commodity volatility | 5 | % | – | 111 | % | | | | | Commodity volatility | 3% | – | 236% | | 29% |
| | | Commodity correlation | (48 | )% | – | 95 | % | | | | | Commodity correlation | (45)% | – | 95% | | 31% |
MSRs | 4,419 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Refer to Note 14 | | | 3,267 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Refer to Note 15 | |
Other assets | 303 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Credit spread | 45 | bps | | 45 | bps | 242 |
| | Discounted cash flows | Credit spread | 45 bps | | 45 bps |
| | | Yield | 12% | | 12 | % | | | Yield | 12% | | 12% |
| 775 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $ | 18 |
| – | $ | 115 |
| | $ | 36 |
| 395 |
| | Market comparables | Price | $16 | – | $119 | | $37 |
Long-term debt, short-term borrowings, and deposits(e) | 27,986 |
| | Option pricing | Interest rate spread volatility | 20 | bps | – | 30 | bps | | 25,359 |
| | Option pricing | Interest rate volatility | 6% | – | 91% | | 21% |
| | Interest rate correlation | (28 | )% | – | 96 | % | | | | | Interest rate correlation | (65)% | – | 94% | | 38% |
| | IR-FX correlation | (58 | )% | – | 60 | % | | | | | IR-FX correlation | (50)% | – | 35% | | 1% |
| | Equity correlation | 10 | % | – | 98 | % | | | | | Equity correlation | 25% | – | 100% | | 78% |
| | Equity-FX correlation | (81 | )% | – | 59 | % | | | | | Equity-FX correlation | (77)% | – | 40% | | (17)% |
| | Equity-IR correlation | 25 | % | – | 60 | % | | | | | Equity-IR correlation | 20% | – | 35% | | 28% |
Other level 3 assets and liabilities, net(f) | 229 |
| | | | | | | 312 |
| |
| |
(a) | The categories presented in the table have been aggregated based upon the product type, which may differ from their classification on the Consolidated balance sheets. Furthermore, the inputs presented for each valuation technique in the table are, in some cases, not applicable to every instrument valued using the technique as the characteristics of the instruments can differ. |
| |
(b) | Comprises U.S. GSEs and government agency securities of $811$519 million, nonagency securities of $24 million and trading loans of $297$599 million. |
| |
(c) | Comprises nonagency securities of $5$3 million, trading loans of $141$223 million and non-trading loans of $1$283 million. |
| |
(d) | Comprises trading loans. |
| |
(e) | Long-term debt, short-term borrowings and deposits include structured notes issued by the Firm that are financial instruments that typically contain embedded derivatives. The estimation of the fair value of structured notes includes the derivative features embedded within the instrument. The significant unobservable inputs are broadly consistent with those presented for derivative receivables. |
| |
(f) | Includes level 3 assets and liabilities that are insignificant both individually and in aggregate. |
| |
(g) | Price is a significant unobservable input for certain instruments. When quoted market prices are not readily available, reliance is generally placed on price-based internal valuation techniques. The price input is expressed assuming a par value of $100. |
| |
(h) | Forward equity price is expressed as a percentage of the current equity price. |
| |
(i) | Amounts represent weighted averages except for derivative related inputs where arithmetic averages are used. |
Changes in and ranges of unobservable inputs
Refer to Note 2 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the impact on fair value of changes in unobservable inputs and the relationships between unobservable inputs as well as a description of attributes of the underlying instruments and external market factors that affect the range of inputs used in the valuation of the Firm’s positions.
Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements
The following tables include a rollforward of the Consolidated balance sheets amounts (including changes in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Firm within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall
fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. Also, the Firm risk-manages the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2 risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the following tables do not reflect the effect of the Firm’s risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments.
| | | Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | | Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | |
Three months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Fair value at July 1, 2019 | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2019 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2019 | |
Purchases(f) | Sales | | Settlements(g) | |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Fair value at Jan 1, 2020 | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at March 31, 2020 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at March 31, 2020 |
| Purchases(f) | Sales | | Settlements(g) |
Assets:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 617 |
| | $ | (71 | ) | | $ | 424 |
| $ | (104 | ) | | $ | (45 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 811 |
| | $ | (70 | ) | | $ | 797 |
| | $ | (139 | ) | | $ | 19 |
| $ | (116 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 519 |
| | $ | (131 | ) | |
Residential – nonagency | 42 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| (3 | ) | | — |
| — |
| (17 | ) | | 24 |
| | (1 | ) | | 23 |
| | (1 | ) | | 2 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 24 |
| | (1 | ) | |
Commercial – nonagency | 9 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| (5 | ) | | — |
| — |
| (2 | ) | | 5 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | (1 | ) | 1 |
| (2 | ) | | 3 |
| | — |
| |
Total mortgage-backed securities | 668 |
| | (71 | ) | | 429 |
| (112 | ) | | (45 | ) | — |
| (29 | ) | | 840 |
| | (71 | ) | | 824 |
| | (140 | ) | | 22 |
| (116 | ) | | (43 | ) | 1 |
| (2 | ) | | 546 |
| | (132 | ) | |
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 680 |
| | (2 | ) | | 27 |
| (77 | ) | | (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 627 |
| | (2 | ) | | 10 |
| | — |
| | — |
| (1 | ) | | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| |
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 190 |
| | (1 | ) | | 40 |
| (74 | ) | | — |
| 3 |
| (12 | ) | | 146 |
| | (1 | ) | | 155 |
| | (12 | ) | | 90 |
| (57 | ) | | — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | | 175 |
| | (10 | ) | |
Corporate debt securities | 562 |
| | 45 |
| | 56 |
| (167 | ) | | — |
| 17 |
| (29 | ) | | 484 |
| | 3 |
| | 558 |
| | (55 | ) | | 292 |
| (42 | ) | | — |
| 227 |
| (27 | ) | | 953 |
| | (50 | ) | |
Loans | 1,778 |
| | (44 | ) | | 152 |
| (82 | ) | | (132 | ) | 211 |
| (137 | ) | | 1,746 |
| | (46 | ) | | 1,382 |
| | (161 | ) | | 699 |
| (162 | ) | | (53 | ) | 1,788 |
| (139 | ) | | 3,354 |
| | (190 | ) | |
Asset-backed securities | 33 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | 3 |
| (5 | ) | | 38 |
| | (2 | ) | | 37 |
| | (2 | ) | | 36 |
| (15 | ) | | (1 | ) | — |
| (3 | ) | | 52 |
| | (1 | ) | |
Total debt instruments | 3,911 |
| | (73 | ) | | 715 |
| (514 | ) | | (180 | ) | 234 |
| (212 | ) | | 3,881 |
| | (119 | ) | | 2,966 |
| | (370 | ) | | 1,139 |
| (393 | ) | | (97 | ) | 2,016 |
| (172 | ) | | 5,089 |
| | (383 | ) | |
Equity securities | 147 |
| | (14 | ) | | 10 |
| (10 | ) | | — |
| 46 |
| (9 | ) | | 170 |
| | (16 | ) | | 196 |
| | (38 | ) | | 10 |
| (4 | ) | | — |
| 82 |
| (33 | ) | | 213 |
| | (39 | ) | |
Other | 311 |
| | 18 |
| | 35 |
| (15 | ) | | (15 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | | 332 |
| | 23 |
| | 232 |
| | (1 | ) | | 9 |
| (5 | ) | | (12 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | | 221 |
| | 2 |
| |
Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments | 4,369 |
| | (69 | ) | (c) | 760 |
| (539 | ) | | (195 | ) | 280 |
| (223 | ) | | 4,383 |
| | (112 | ) | (c) | 3,394 |
| | (409 | ) | (c) | 1,158 |
| (402 | ) | | (109 | ) | 2,098 |
| (207 | ) | | 5,523 |
| | (420 | ) | (c) |
Net derivative receivables:(b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | (544 | ) | | 88 |
| | 39 |
| (15 | ) | | 53 |
| 10 |
| 50 |
| | (319 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (332 | ) | | 642 |
| | 66 |
| (50 | ) | | (241 | ) | (172 | ) | (49 | ) | | (136 | ) | | 282 |
| |
Credit | (232 | ) | | (65 | ) | | 3 |
| (3 | ) | | (23 | ) | 3 |
| — |
| | (317 | ) | | (68 | ) | | (139 | ) | | 108 |
| | 18 |
| (128 | ) | | (33 | ) | 60 |
| 3 |
| | (111 | ) | | 65 |
| |
Foreign exchange | (193 | ) | | (653 | ) | | 2 |
| (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | 6 |
| (1 | ) | | (841 | ) | | (657 | ) | | (607 | ) | | (339 | ) | | 38 |
| (4 | ) | | (14 | ) | — |
| (1 | ) | | (927 | ) | | (508 | ) | |
Equity | (2,560 | ) | | (382 | ) | | 174 |
| (118 | ) | | (377 | ) | (203 | ) | (2 | ) | | (3,468 | ) | | (362 | ) | | (3,395 | ) | | 3,037 |
| | 59 |
| (548 | ) | | 583 |
| (656 | ) | 94 |
| | (826 | ) | | 3,707 |
| |
Commodity | (908 | ) | | 8 |
| | 22 |
| (69 | ) | | 6 |
| 18 |
| 876 |
| | (47 | ) | | 40 |
| | (16 | ) | | (403 | ) | | 4 |
| (15 | ) | | 9 |
| (6 | ) | 2 |
| | (425 | ) | | (399 | ) | |
Total net derivative receivables | (4,437 | ) | | (1,004 | ) | (c) | 240 |
| (206 | ) | | (342 | ) | (166 | ) | 923 |
| | (4,992 | ) | | (1,062 | ) | (c) | (4,489 | ) | | 3,045 |
| (c) | 185 |
| (745 | ) | | 304 |
| (774 | ) | 49 |
| | (2,425 | ) | | 3,147 |
| (c) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Asset-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | |
Total available-for-sale securities | — |
| | — |
|
| 1 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
| 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| | (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
|
Loans | 5 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| | (4 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| | (11 | ) | (c) | — |
| — |
| | — |
| 294 |
| — |
| | 283 |
| | (10 | ) | (c) |
Mortgage servicing rights | 5,093 |
| | (447 | ) | (d) | 388 |
| (359 | ) | | (256 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 4,419 |
| | (447 | ) | (d) | 4,699 |
| | (1,382 | ) | (d) | 273 |
| (75 | ) | | (248 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 3,267 |
| | (1,382 | ) | (d) |
Other assets | 861 |
| | (56 | ) | (c) | 19 |
| (72 | ) | | (6 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 746 |
| | (56 | ) | (c) | 724 |
| | (82 | ) | (c) | 2 |
| (28 | ) | | (200 | ) | — |
| — |
| | 416 |
| | (81 | ) | (c) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | | Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | |
Three months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Fair value at July 1, 2019 | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2019 | Change in unrealized (gains)/ losses related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2019 | |
Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements(g) | |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Fair value at Jan 1, 2020 | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at March 31, 2020 | Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at March 31, 2020 |
| Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements(g) |
Liabilities:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 4,066 |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 153 |
| $ | (188 | ) | $ | 12 |
| $ | (407 | ) | | $ | 3,636 |
| | $ | 16 |
| (c)(e) | $ | 3,360 |
| | $ | (149 | ) | (c)(e) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 386 |
| $ | (172 | ) | $ | 4 |
| $ | (250 | ) | | $ | 3,179 |
| | $ | (135 | ) | (c)(e) |
Short-term borrowings | 2,052 |
| | 24 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 949 |
| (1,040 | ) | 17 |
| (1 | ) | | 2,001 |
| | 28 |
| (c)(e) | 1,674 |
| | (345 | ) | (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 1,615 |
| (929 | ) | 40 |
| (16 | ) | | 2,039 |
| | (409 | ) | (c)(e) |
Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments | 45 |
| | — |
|
| (5 | ) | 25 |
| — |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| — |
| | 68 |
| | — |
|
| 41 |
| | 3 |
| (c) | (75 | ) | 7 |
| — |
| — |
| 86 |
| (1 | ) | | 61 |
| | 6 |
| (c) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 92 |
| | (6 | ) | (c) | (71 | ) | 4 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 19 |
| | (2 | ) | (c) | 45 |
| | (8 | ) | (c) | (23 | ) | 1 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 15 |
| | (7 | ) | (c) |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
|
Long-term debt | 21,863 |
| | 187 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 2,230 |
| (1,758 | ) | 49 |
| (222 | ) | | 22,349 |
| | 89 |
| (c)(e) | 23,339 |
| | (4,110 | ) | (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 4,607 |
| (3,549 | ) | 370 |
| (516 | ) | | 20,141 |
| | (3,984 | ) | (c)(e) |
| |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
|
| | Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Fair value at July 1, 2018 | | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) |
| |
|
| Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2018 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2018 | |
Purchases(f) | Sales |
| | Settlements(g) | | |
Three months ended March 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Fair value at Jan 1, 2019 | | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) |
| |
| |
|
| Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at March 31, 2019 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at March 31, 2019 |
| Purchases(f) | Sales | |
| | Settlements(g) | |
Assets:(a) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 478 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| $ | 14 |
| $ | (28 | ) |
| | $ | (17 | ) |
| $ | 83 |
| $ | (3 | ) |
| $ | 529 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 549 |
| | $ | (15 | ) |
| $ | 5 |
| $ | (100 | ) | |
| | $ | (18 | ) |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | (10 | ) |
| $ | 412 |
|
| $ | (16 | ) |
|
Residential – nonagency | 87 |
| | 1 |
|
| — |
| (6 | ) |
| | (3 | ) |
| 18 |
| (20 | ) |
| 77 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 64 |
| | 24 |
|
| 70 |
| (69 | ) | |
| | (1 | ) |
| 15 |
| (18 | ) |
| 85 |
|
| 1 |
|
|
Commercial – nonagency | 18 |
| | (1 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| |
|
|
| 9 |
| (13 | ) |
| 13 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| 11 |
| | 2 |
|
| 12 |
| (19 | ) | |
| | (2 | ) |
| 15 |
| (2 | ) |
| 17 |
|
| 1 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 583 |
| | 2 |
|
| 14 |
| (34 | ) |
| | (20 | ) |
| 110 |
| (36 | ) |
| 619 |
|
| — |
|
| 624 |
| | 11 |
|
| 87 |
| (188 | ) | |
| | (21 | ) |
| 31 |
| (30 | ) |
| 514 |
|
| (14 | ) |
|
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 736 |
| | 8 |
|
| 26 |
| (70 | ) |
| | (1 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 699 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 689 |
| | 13 |
|
| 1 |
| (74 | ) | |
| | (6 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 623 |
|
| 14 |
|
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 183 |
| | (9 | ) |
| 44 |
| (29 | ) |
| | (2 | ) |
| 1 |
| (24 | ) |
| 164 |
|
| (9 | ) |
| 155 |
| | (1 | ) |
| 71 |
| (54 | ) | |
| | — |
|
| 2 |
| (3 | ) |
| 170 |
|
| (1 | ) |
|
Corporate debt securities | 274 |
| | (2 | ) |
| 156 |
| (87 | ) |
| | (4 | ) |
| 82 |
| (24 | ) |
| 395 |
|
| (3 | ) |
| 334 |
| | 22 |
|
| 223 |
| (7 | ) | |
| | — |
|
| 28 |
| (32 | ) |
| 568 |
|
| 39 |
|
|
Loans | 1,986 |
| | 17 |
|
| 188 |
| (146 | ) |
| | (199 | ) |
| 48 |
| (361 | ) |
| 1,533 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 1,706 |
| | 83 |
|
| 72 |
| (118 | ) | |
| | (120 | ) |
| 159 |
| (41 | ) |
| 1,741 |
|
| 83 |
|
|
Asset-backed securities | 87 |
| | 6 |
|
| 5 |
| (7 | ) |
| | (13 | ) |
| 5 |
| (7 | ) |
| 76 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 127 |
| | (2 | ) |
| 17 |
| (21 | ) | |
| | (7 | ) |
| 20 |
| (15 | ) |
| 119 |
|
| (4 | ) |
|
Total debt instruments | 3,849 |
| | 22 |
|
| 433 |
| (373 | ) |
| | (239 | ) |
| 246 |
| (452 | ) |
| 3,486 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 3,635 |
| | 126 |
|
| 471 |
| (462 | ) | |
| | (154 | ) |
| 240 |
| (121 | ) |
| 3,735 |
|
| 117 |
|
|
Equity securities | 288 |
| | 20 |
|
| 6 |
| (48 | ) |
| |
|
|
| 82 |
| (19 | ) |
| 329 |
|
| (18 | ) |
| 232 |
| | (2 | ) |
| 15 |
| (79 | ) | |
| | (22 | ) |
| 75 |
| (17 | ) |
| 202 |
|
| (2 | ) |
|
Other | 406 |
| | 30 |
|
| 13 |
| — |
|
| | (37 | ) |
| 2 |
| (1 | ) |
| 413 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 301 |
| | 4 |
|
| 12 |
| (1 | ) | |
| | (11 | ) |
| 1 |
| (2 | ) |
| 304 |
|
| 13 |
|
|
Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments | 4,543 |
| | 72 |
| (c) | 452 |
| (421 | ) |
| | (276 | ) |
| 330 |
| (472 | ) |
| 4,228 |
|
| (7 | ) | (c) | 4,168 |
| | 128 |
| (c) | 498 |
| (542 | ) | |
| | (187 | ) |
| 316 |
| (140 | ) |
| 4,241 |
|
| 128 |
| (c) |
Net derivative receivables:(b) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate | 489 |
| | 236 |
|
| 28 |
| (22 | ) |
| | (101 | ) |
| 68 |
| (7 | ) |
| 691 |
|
| 216 |
|
| (38 | ) | | (322 | ) |
| 19 |
| (27 | ) | (i) |
| | 178 |
| (i) | 18 |
| 25 |
|
| (147 | ) |
| (376 | ) |
|
Credit | (24 | ) | | (19 | ) |
| 1 |
| — |
|
| | 47 |
|
| 6 |
| 16 |
|
| 27 |
|
| (15 | ) |
| (107 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| — |
| (1 | ) | |
| | 6 |
|
| 3 |
| 1 |
|
| (115 | ) |
| (21 | ) |
|
Foreign exchange | (245 | ) | | (56 | ) |
| 29 |
| (7 | ) |
| | (49 | ) |
| (2 | ) | 28 |
|
| (302 | ) |
| (54 | ) |
| (297 | ) | | (245 | ) |
| 1 |
| (9 | ) | |
| | 181 |
|
| (8 | ) | 21 |
|
| (356 | ) |
| (220 | ) |
|
Equity | (2,578 | ) | | (94 | ) |
| 643 |
| (635 | ) |
| | 622 |
|
| (251 | ) | 16 |
|
| (2,277 | ) |
| (121 | ) |
| (2,225 | ) | | 731 |
|
| 127 |
| (297 | ) | |
| | (401 | ) |
| (67 | ) | 66 |
|
| (2,066 | ) |
| 226 |
|
|
Commodity | (752 | ) | | 318 |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| | (113 | ) |
| 15 |
| 7 |
|
| (525 | ) |
| 138 |
|
| (1,129 | ) | | 533 |
|
| 3 |
| (88 | ) | |
| | 24 |
|
| 1 |
| (9 | ) |
| (665 | ) |
| 507 |
|
|
Total net derivative receivables | (3,110 | ) | | 385 |
| (c) | 701 |
| (664 | ) |
| | 406 |
|
| (164 | ) | 60 |
|
| (2,386 | ) |
| 164 |
| (c) | (3,796 | ) | | 680 |
| (c) | 150 |
| (422 | ) | |
| | (12 | ) |
| (53 | ) | 104 |
|
| (3,349 | ) |
| 116 |
| (c) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Mortgage-backed securities | 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| |
| | (1 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
Asset-backed securities | 147 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| | (86 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 61 |
|
| — |
|
| |
Total available-for-sale securities | 148 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| | (86 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 62 |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| |
| | (1 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
Loans | 159 |
| | (1 | ) | (c) | 1 |
| — |
|
| | (19 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 140 |
|
| (1 | ) | (c) | 122 |
| | 3 |
| (c) | — |
| — |
| |
| | (2 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 123 |
|
| 3 |
| (c) |
Mortgage servicing rights | 6,241 |
| | 98 |
| (d) | 291 |
| (2 | ) |
| | (195 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 6,433 |
|
| 98 |
| (d) | 6,130 |
| | (299 | ) | (d) | 436 |
| (111 | ) | |
| | (199 | ) |
| — |
| — |
|
| 5,957 |
|
| (299 | ) | (d) |
Other assets | 1,225 |
| | (160 | ) | (c) | 2 |
| — |
| | | (7 | ) | | 3 |
| — |
| | 1,063 |
| | (160 | ) | (c) | 927 |
| | (7 | ) | (c) | 9 |
| (80 | ) | | | | (1 | ) | | — |
| (7 | ) | | 841 |
| | (10 | ) | (c) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Fair value at July 1, 2018 | | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses |
|
| |
| | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2018 | Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2018 | |
Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements(g) |
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Fair value at Jan 1, 2019 | | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses |
|
| |
| |
| | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at March 31, 2019 | Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at March 31, 2019 |
| Purchases | Sales | | Issuances | Settlements(g) |
|
Liabilities:(a) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits | $ | 4,305 |
| | $ | (84 | ) | (c)(e) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 517 |
| | $ | (170 | ) |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | (129 | ) |
| $ | 4,440 |
|
| $ | (82 | ) | (c)(e) | $ | 4,169 |
| | $ | 152 |
| (c)(e) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 335 |
| | $ | (24 | ) |
| $ | — |
| $ | (104 | ) |
| $ | 4,528 |
|
| $ | 144 |
| (c)(e) |
Short-term borrowings | 2,209 |
| | (47 | ) | (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 713 |
| | (885 | ) |
| 6 |
| (25 | ) |
| 1,971 |
|
| (31 | ) | (c)(e) | 1,523 |
| | 46 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| | 651 |
| | (601 | ) |
| 1 |
| (118 | ) |
| 1,502 |
|
| 80 |
| (c)(e) |
Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments | 43 |
| | 36 |
| (c) | (6 | ) | 19 |
| — |
| | (2 | ) |
| 7 |
| (1 | ) |
| 96 |
|
| 36 |
| (c) | 50 |
| | — |
|
| (2 | ) | 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 3 |
| (10 | ) |
| 52 |
|
| 1 |
| (c) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 8 |
| | 1 |
| (c) | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
|
| 3 |
| — |
|
| 12 |
|
| 1 |
| (c) | 10 |
| | — |
|
| (5 | ) | 10 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| 15 |
|
| — |
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 1 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | (1 | ) | (c) | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
Long-term debt | 17,632 |
| (i) | 194 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 3,551 |
| | (1,809 | ) |
| 59 |
| (219 | ) |
| 19,408 |
| (i) | 192 |
| (c)(e) | 19,418 |
| | 1,273 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| | 2,051 |
| | (1,188 | ) |
| 273 |
| (172 | ) |
| 21,655 |
|
| 1,625 |
| (c)(e) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Fair value at January 1, 2019 | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) | | | | | | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2019 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2019 |
Purchases(f) | Sales | | | Settlements(g) | |
Assets:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 549 |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 747 |
| $ | (272 | ) | | | $ | (83 | ) | | $ | 1 |
| $ | (20 | ) | | $ | 811 |
| | $ | (116 | ) | |
Residential – nonagency | 64 |
| | 25 |
| | 83 |
| (86 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | 15 |
| (57 | ) | | 24 |
| | (1 | ) | |
Commercial – nonagency | 11 |
| | 2 |
| | 19 |
| (24 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | 15 |
| (4 | ) | | 5 |
| | 1 |
| |
Total mortgage-backed securities | 624 |
| | (84 | ) | | 849 |
| (382 | ) | | | (117 | ) | | 31 |
| (81 | ) | | 840 |
| | (116 | ) | |
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 689 |
| | 12 |
| | 85 |
| (152 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 627 |
| | 13 |
| |
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 155 |
| | (2 | ) | | 228 |
| (231 | ) | | | — |
| | 14 |
| (18 | ) | | 146 |
| | 3 |
| |
Corporate debt securities | 334 |
| | 74 |
| | 340 |
| (236 | ) | | | (53 | ) | | 96 |
| (71 | ) | | 484 |
| | 15 |
| |
Loans | 1,706 |
| | 95 |
| | 609 |
| (416 | ) | | | (408 | ) | | 509 |
| (349 | ) | | 1,746 |
| | 44 |
| |
Asset-backed securities | 127 |
| | — |
| | 30 |
| (81 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | 23 |
| (22 | ) | | 38 |
| | (3 | ) | |
Total debt instruments | 3,635 |
| | 95 |
| | 2,141 |
| (1,498 | ) | | | (624 | ) | | 673 |
| (541 | ) | | 3,881 |
| | (44 | ) | |
Equity securities | 232 |
| | (28 | ) | | 33 |
| (92 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | 142 |
| (95 | ) | | 170 |
| | (21 | ) | |
Other | 301 |
| | 42 |
| | 50 |
| (16 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | 1 |
| (5 | ) | | 332 |
| | 55 |
| |
Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments | 4,168 |
| | 109 |
| (c) | 2,224 |
| (1,606 | ) | | | (687 | ) | | 816 |
| (641 | ) | | 4,383 |
| | (10 | ) | (c) |
Net derivative receivables:(b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | (38 | ) | | (575 | ) | | 86 |
| (102 | ) | (i) | | 174 |
| (i) | 22 |
| 114 |
| | (319 | ) | | (694 | ) | |
Credit | (107 | ) | | (209 | ) | | 16 |
| (5 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | 7 |
| (6 | ) | | (317 | ) | | (169 | ) | |
Foreign exchange | (297 | ) | | (840 | ) | | 13 |
| (18 | ) | | | 294 |
| | (19 | ) | 26 |
| | (841 | ) | | (815 | ) | |
Equity | (2,225 | ) | | 328 |
| | 335 |
| (573 | ) | | | (1,062 | ) | | (418 | ) | 147 |
| | (3,468 | ) | | (1,193 | ) | |
Commodity | (1,129 | ) | | 370 |
| | 32 |
| (240 | ) | | | 51 |
| | 2 |
| 867 |
| | (47 | ) | | 634 |
| |
Total net derivative receivables | (3,796 | ) | | (926 | ) | (c) | 482 |
| (938 | ) | | | (556 | ) | | (406 | ) | 1,148 |
| | (4,992 | ) | | (2,237 | ) | (c) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | | (1 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| |
Asset-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Total available-for-sale securities | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | | (1 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| |
Loans | 122 |
| | 4 |
| (c) | — |
| — |
| | | (125 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| |
Mortgage servicing rights | 6,130 |
| | (1,572 | ) | (d) | 1,250 |
| (687 | ) | | | (702 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 4,419 |
| | (1,572 | ) | (d) |
Other assets | 927 |
| | (152 | ) | (c) | 170 |
| (160 | ) | | | (33 | ) | | 1 |
| (7 | ) | | 746 |
| | (145 | ) | (c) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Fair value at January 1, 2019 | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses | | | | | | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2019 | Change in unrealized (gains)/ losses related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2019 |
Purchases | Sales | | Issuances | Settlements(g) | |
Liabilities:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 4,169 |
| | $ | 241 |
| (c)(e) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 580 |
| $ | (504 | ) | | $ | 12 |
| $ | (862 | ) | | $ | 3,636 |
| | $ | 250 |
| (c)(e) |
Short-term borrowings | 1,523 |
| | 142 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| | 2,637 |
| (2,265 | ) | | 85 |
| (121 | ) | | 2,001 |
| | 74 |
| (c)(e) |
Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments | 50 |
| | — |
| | (12 | ) | 41 |
| | — |
| 1 |
| | 9 |
| (21 | ) | | 68 |
| | (1 | ) | (c) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 10 |
| | (7 | ) | (c) | (79 | ) | 94 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | 19 |
| | 4 |
| (c) |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | (c) | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Long-term debt | 19,418 |
| | 1,915 |
| (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| | 6,929 |
| (5,675 | ) | | 522 |
| (760 | ) | | 22,349 |
| | 2,010 |
| (c)(e) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
| | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Fair value at January 1, 2018 | Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) | | | | | | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2018 | Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2018 |
Purchases(f) | Sales | | | Settlements(g) | |
Assets:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 307 |
| $ | 5 |
| | $ | 348 |
| $ | (126 | ) | | | $ | (56 | ) | | $ | 92 |
| $ | (41 | ) | | $ | 529 |
| | $ | 3 |
| |
Residential – nonagency | 60 |
| 1 |
| | 45 |
| (19 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | 58 |
| (62 | ) | | 77 |
| | 4 |
| |
Commercial – nonagency | 11 |
| 2 |
| | 7 |
| (8 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | 30 |
| (16 | ) | | 13 |
| | (1 | ) | |
Total mortgage-backed securities | 378 |
| 8 |
| | 400 |
| (153 | ) | | | (75 | ) | | 180 |
| (119 | ) | | 619 |
| | 6 |
| |
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies | 1 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | | — |
| | — |
| (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 744 |
| (3 | ) | | 107 |
| (70 | ) | | | (79 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 699 |
| | (3 | ) | |
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 78 |
| (19 | ) | | 395 |
| (213 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | 18 |
| (93 | ) | | 164 |
| | (18 | ) | |
Corporate debt securities | 312 |
| (6 | ) | | 297 |
| (227 | ) | | | (15 | ) | | 249 |
| (215 | ) | | 395 |
| | (1 | ) | |
Loans | 2,719 |
| 58 |
| | 1,223 |
| (1,680 | ) | | | (528 | ) | | 422 |
| (681 | ) | | 1,533 |
| | (22 | ) | |
Asset-backed securities | 153 |
| 15 |
| | 64 |
| (29 | ) | | | (53 | ) | | 18 |
| (92 | ) | | 76 |
| | 8 |
| |
Total debt instruments | 4,385 |
| 53 |
| | 2,486 |
| (2,372 | ) | | | (752 | ) | | 887 |
| (1,201 | ) | | 3,486 |
| | (30 | ) | |
Equity securities | 295 |
| (1 | ) | | 99 |
| (108 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | 86 |
| (41 | ) | | 329 |
| | 11 |
| |
Other | 690 |
| (209 | ) | | 47 |
| (40 | ) | | | (75 | ) | | 3 |
| (3 | ) | | 413 |
| | (250 | ) | |
Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments | 5,370 |
| (157 | ) | (c) | 2,632 |
| (2,520 | ) | | | (828 | ) | | 976 |
| (1,245 | ) | | 4,228 |
| | (269 | ) | (c) |
Net derivative receivables:(b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | 264 |
| 576 |
| | 83 |
| (77 | ) | | | (234 | ) | | 40 |
| 39 |
| | 691 |
| | 498 |
| |
Credit | (35 | ) | 19 |
| | 3 |
| (7 | ) | | | 22 |
| | 5 |
| 20 |
| | 27 |
| | 7 |
| |
Foreign exchange | (396 | ) | 184 |
| | 42 |
| (15 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | (114 | ) | 43 |
| | (302 | ) | | 42 |
| |
Equity | (3,409 | ) | 688 |
| | 1,467 |
| (1,919 | ) | | | 1,043 |
| | (324 | ) | 177 |
| | (2,277 | ) | | 31 |
| |
Commodity | (674 | ) | 468 |
| | — |
| — |
| | | (287 | ) | | 7 |
| (39 | ) | | (525 | ) | | 158 |
| |
Total net derivative receivables | (4,250 | ) | 1,935 |
| (c) | 1,595 |
| (2,018 | ) | | | 498 |
| | (386 | ) | 240 |
| | (2,386 | ) | | 736 |
| (c) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | 1 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| |
Asset-backed securities | 276 |
| 1 |
| | — |
| — |
| | | (216 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 61 |
| | 1 |
| |
Total available-for-sale securities | 277 |
| 1 |
| (j) | — |
| — |
| | | (216 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 62 |
| | 1 |
| (j) |
Loans | 276 |
| (5 | ) | (c) | 123 |
| — |
| | | (180 | ) | | — |
| (74 | ) | | 140 |
| | (5 | ) | (c) |
Mortgage servicing rights | 6,030 |
| 576 |
| (d) | 770 |
| (401 | ) | | | (542 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 6,433 |
| | 576 |
| (d) |
Other assets | 1,265 |
| (210 | ) | (c) | 49 |
| (16 | ) | | | (28 | ) | | 4 |
| (1 | ) | | 1,063 |
| | (217 | ) | (c) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Fair value at January 1, 2018 | Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses | | | | | | | Transfers into level 3(h) | Transfers (out of) level 3(h) | Fair value at September 30, 2018 | Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at September 30, 2018 |
Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements(g) | |
Liabilities:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 4,142 |
| $ | (125 | ) | (c)(e) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,272 |
| | $ | (425 | ) | | $ | 2 |
| $ | (426 | ) | | $ | 4,440 |
| | $ | (115 | ) | (c)(e) |
Short-term borrowings | 1,665 |
| (229 | ) | (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 2,783 |
| | (2,245 | ) | | 61 |
| (64 | ) | | 1,971 |
| | 26 |
| (c)(e) |
Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments | 39 |
| 28 |
| (c) | (68 | ) | 95 |
| — |
| | (1 | ) | | 9 |
| (6 | ) | | 96 |
| | 11 |
| (c) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 13 |
| — |
| | (6 | ) | 1 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| — |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 39 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | (38 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| |
Long-term debt | 16,125 |
| (396 | ) | (c)(e) | — |
| — |
| 9,792 |
| (i) | (6,195 | ) | (i) | 653 |
| (571 | ) | | 19,408 |
| (i) | (576 | ) | (c)(e) |
| |
(a) | Level 3 assets as a percentage of total Firm assets accounted for at fair value (including assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 2% and 3% at September 30, 2019both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value (including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 15%8% and 16%, at both September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. |
| |
(b) | All level 3 derivatives are presented on a net basis, irrespective of the underlying counterparty. |
| |
(c) | Predominantly reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair value for CCB mortgage loans and lending-related commitments originated with the intent to sell, and mortgage loan purchase commitments, which are reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
| |
(d) | Changes in fair value for MSRs are reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
| |
(e) | Realized (gains)/losses due to DVA for fair value option elected liabilities are reported in principal transactions revenue, and they were not material for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. Unrealized (gains)/losses are reported in OCI, and they were $(62) million$(1.1) billion and $123176 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively and $108 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and were 0t material for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.respectively. |
| |
(f) | Loan originations are included in purchases. |
| |
(g) | Includes financial assets and liabilities that have matured, been partially or fully repaid, impacts of modifications, deconsolidations associated with beneficial interests in VIEs and other items. |
| |
(h) | All transfers into and/or out of level 3 are based on changes in the observability and/or significance of the valuation inputs and are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur. |
| |
(i) | The prior periodprior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
| |
(j) | Realized gains/(losses) on AFS securities, as well as other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses that are recorded in earnings, are reported in investment securities gains/(losses). Unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in OCI. There were 0 realized gains/(losses) recorded in income on AFS securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on AFS securities in OCI were 0 for both the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively and 0 and $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
Level 3 analysis
Consolidated balance sheets changes
Level 3 assets, including assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, were 0.6% of total Firm assets at September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets since December 31, 2018,2019, for those items measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Refer to Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on page 9796 for further information on changes impacting items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020
Level 3 assets were $15.1$19.2 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, reflecting a decreasean increase of $1.4 billion and $2.0$5.6 billion from June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.2019 reflective of heightened market volatility and net transfers largely due to:
The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was predominantly driven by a reduction of $674 million$2.0 billion increase in MSRs and a reduction of $619 milliontrading loans.
$3.1 billion increase in gross equity derivative receivables due to settlements.receivables.
The$1.4 billion decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was predominantly driven by a reduction of approximately $1.7 billion in MSRs.
Refer to the Gains and losses sectionsections below for additional information.
Transfers between levels for instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis
For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, there were no individuallyMarch 31, 2020, significant transfers from level 2 to level 3.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, individually significant transfers from level 3 to level 2 included $906 million and $927 million, respectively of gross commodities derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability.
For the three months ended September 30, 2018, there were no individually significant transfers from level 2 to level 3.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, significant transfers from level 2 tointo level 3 included the following:
$2.1 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans, driven by a decrease in observability.
$1.0 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.
For the three months ended September 30, 2018,March 31, 2020, there were no individually significant transfers from level 3 tointo level 2.
For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there were no significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 toor from level 2 included the following:
$1.2 billion of total debt and equity instruments, the majority of which were trading loans, driven by an increase in observability.
$1.0 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.2 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.3 into level 2.
All transfers are based on changes in the observability and/or significance of the valuation inputs and are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur.
Gains and losses
The following describes significant components of total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods indicated. These amounts exclude any effects of the Firm’s risk management activities where the financial instruments are classified as level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements rollforward tables on pages 90–92–95 for further information on these instruments.
Three months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020
$1.61.2 billion of net lossesgains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net equity derivative receivables due to market movements and MSRs largely reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates. Refer to Note 14 for information on MSRs.
$205 million of netoffset by losses on liabilities, none of which were individually significant.
Three months ended September 30, 2018
$394 million of net gains on assets and $100 million of net gains on liabilities, none of which were individually significant.
Nine months ended September 30, 2019
$2.5 billion of net losses on assets, driven by net derivative receivables due to market movements andin MSRs reflecting faster prepayment speeds on lower rates. Refer to Note 1415 for information on MSRs.
$2.34.6 billion of net gains on liabilities, predominantly driven by market movements in long-term debt.
Three months ended March 31, 2019
$505 million of net gains on assets, none of which were individually significant.
$1.5 billion of net losses on liabilities predominantly driven by market movements in long-term debt.
Nine months ended September 30, 2018
$2.1 billion of net gains on assets predominantly driven by market movements in derivative receivables.
| |
• | $722 million of net gains on liabilities, none of which were individually significant.
|
Credit and funding adjustments — derivatives
The following table provides the impact of credit and funding adjustments on principal transactions revenue in the respective periods, excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities. The FVA presented below includes the impact of the Firm’s own credit quality on the inception value of liabilities as well as the impact of changes in the Firm’s own credit quality over time. | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Credit and funding adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives CVA | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 66 |
| | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 223 |
| $ | (924 | ) | | $ | 60 |
|
Derivatives FVA | (83 | ) | | 88 |
| | (20 | ) | | 102 |
| (1,021 | ) | | 152 |
|
Refer to Note 2 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information about both credit and funding adjustments, as well as information about valuation adjustments on fair value option elected liabilities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
The following tables present the assets and liabilities held as of September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively, for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment wasadjustments were recorded during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively, by major product category and fair value hierarchy. | | | Fair value hierarchy | | Total fair value | Fair value hierarchy | | Total fair value |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | Total fair value |
Loans | $ | — |
| $ | 5,338 |
| (b) | $ | 246 |
| (c) | $ | 5,584 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2,336 |
| (c) | $ | 559 |
| (d) |
Other assets(a) | — |
| 18 |
| | 775 |
| | 793 |
| — |
| 11 |
| | 334 |
| | 345 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis | $ | — |
| $ | 5,356 |
| | $ | 1,021 |
| | $ | 6,377 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2,347 |
| | $ | 893 |
| | $ | 3,240 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities(b) | | — |
| — |
| | 775 |
| | 775 |
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 775 |
| | $ | 775 |
|
| | | Fair value hierarchy | | Total fair value | Fair value hierarchy | | Total fair value |
September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | |
March 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | Total fair value |
Loans | $ | — |
| $ | 492 |
| | $ | 243 |
| | $ | 735 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 441 |
| | $ | 84 |
| |
Other assets | — |
| 216 |
| | 826 |
| | 1,042 |
| — |
| 11 |
| | 456 |
| | 467 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis | $ | — |
| $ | 708 |
| | $ | 1,069 |
| | $ | 1,777 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 452 |
| | $ | 540 |
| | $ | 992 |
|
| |
(a) | Primarily includes equity securities without readily determinable fair values that were adjusted based on observable price changes in orderly transactions from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer (measurement alternative). Of the $775$334 million in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2019, $638March 31, 2020, $194 million related to such equity securities.securities adjusted based on the measurement alternative. These equity securities are classified as level 3 due to the infrequency of the observable prices and/or the restrictions on the shares. |
| |
(b) | Represents at March 31, 2020 the markdowns associated with $9.4 billion of held-for-sale positions related to unfunded commitments in the bridge financing portfolio. There were 0 liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2019. |
| |
(c) | Primarily includes certain mortgage loans that were reclassified to held-for-sale. |
| |
(c)(d) | Of the $246$559 million in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2019, $200March 31, 2020, $294 million related to residential real estate loans carried at the net realizable value of the underlying collateral (e.g., collateral-dependent loans and other loans charged off in accordance with regulatory guidance)loans). These amounts are classified as level 3 as they are valued using information from broker’s price opinions, appraisals and automated valuation models and discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values. These discounts ranged from 14%16% to 49%46% with a weighted average of 29%28%. |
There were no material liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2019 and 2018.
Nonrecurring fair value changes
The following table presents the total change in value of assets and liabilities for which a fair value adjustment hasadjustments have been recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, related to assets and liabilities held at those dates.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
Loans | $ | (142 | ) | (b) | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | (232 | ) | (b) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (267 | ) | (b) | $ | (21 | ) |
Other assets(a) | 23 |
| | (117 | ) | | 123 |
| | 383 |
| (169 | ) | | 71 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | | (775 | ) | (c) | — |
|
Total nonrecurring fair value gains/(losses) | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | (139 | ) | | $ | (109 | ) | | $ | 347 |
| $ | (1,211 | ) | | $ | 50 |
|
| |
(a) | Included $34$(154) million and $(113)$78 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively and $132 million and $384 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively of net (losses)/gains as a result of the measurement alternative. |
| |
(b) | Primarily includesIncludes the impact of certain mortgage loans that were reclassified to held-for-sale. |
| |
(c) | Represents markdowns on held-for-sale positions related to unfunded commitments in the bridge financing portfolio. |
Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information about the measurement of impaired collateral-dependent loans, and other loans where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral (e.g., residential mortgage loans charged off in accordance with regulatory guidance).loans.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
The Firm measures certain equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer, with such changes recognized in earnings.other income.
In its determination of the new carrying values upon observable price changes, the Firm may adjust the prices if deemed necessary to arrive at the Firm’s estimated fair values. Such adjustments may include adjustments to reflect the different rights and obligations of similar securities, and other adjustments that are consistent with the Firm’s valuation techniques for private equity direct investments.
The following table presents the carrying value of equity securities without readily determinable fair values still held as of September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, that are measured under the measurement alternative and the related adjustments recorded during the periods presented for those securities with observable price changes. These securities are included in the nonrecurring fair value tables when applicable price changes are observable.
| | | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | Three months ended |
| September 30, | | September 30, | March 31 |
As of or for the period ended, | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
Other assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying value(a) | $ | 2,771 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 2,771 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| $ | 2,560 |
| | $ | 1,819 |
|
Upward carrying value changes(b) | 34 |
| | 14 |
| | 169 |
| | 540 |
| 9 |
| | 84 |
|
Downward carrying value changes/impairment(c) | — |
| | (127 | ) | | (37 | ) | | (156 | ) | (162 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| |
(a) | The carrying value as of December 31, 20182019 was $1.5$2.4 billion. |
| |
(b) | The cumulative upward carrying value changes between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 were $479$524 million. |
| |
(c) | The cumulative downward carrying value changes/impairment between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 were $(197)$(360) million. |
Included in other assets above is the Firm’s interest in approximately 40 million Visa Class B shares, recorded at a nominal carrying value. These shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions currently and will be convertible into Visa Class A shares upon final resolution of certain litigation matters involving Visa. The conversion rate of Visa Class B shares into Visa Class A shares is 1.6228 at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and may be adjusted by Visa depending on developments related to the litigation matters.
Additional disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments that are not carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value
The following table presents by fair value hierarchy classification the carrying values and estimated fair values at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, of financial assets and liabilities, excluding financial instruments that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis, and their classification within the fair value hierarchy.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | Estimated fair value hierarchy | | | | Estimated fair value hierarchy | |
(in billions) | Carrying value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value | | Carrying value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $ | 24.0 |
| $ | 24.0 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 24.0 |
| | $ | 21.7 |
| $ | 21.7 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 21.7 |
|
Deposits with banks | 343.5 |
| 343.5 |
| — |
| — |
| 343.5 |
| | 241.9 |
| 241.9 |
| — |
| — |
| 241.9 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable | 121.3 |
| — |
| 121.3 |
| — |
| 121.3 |
| | 71.3 |
| — |
| 71.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 71.3 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 12.7 |
| — |
| 12.7 |
| — |
| 12.7 |
| | 234.6 |
| — |
| 234.6 |
| — |
| 234.6 |
|
Securities borrowed | 88.3 |
| — |
| 88.3 |
| — |
| 88.3 |
| | 133.5 |
| — |
| 133.5 |
| — |
| 133.5 |
|
Investment securities, held-to-maturity | 71.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 73.4 |
| — |
| 73.5 |
| | 47.5 |
| 0.1 |
| 48.8 |
| — |
| 48.9 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(a) | 985.9 |
| — |
| 217.4 |
| 778.6 |
| 996.0 |
| | 939.5 |
| — |
| 214.1 |
| 734.9 |
| 949.0 |
|
Other | 93.5 |
| — |
| 92.9 |
| 0.8 |
| 93.7 |
| | 61.3 |
| — |
| 60.6 |
| 0.8 |
| 61.4 |
|
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 1,813.4 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,813.7 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,813.7 |
| | $ | 1,533.8 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,534.1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,534.1 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 38.5 |
| — |
| 38.5 |
| — |
| 38.5 |
| | 183.1 |
| — |
| 183.1 |
| — |
| 183.1 |
|
Short-term borrowings | 27.6 |
| — |
| 27.6 |
| — |
| 27.6 |
| | 35.0 |
| — |
| 35.0 |
| — |
| 35.0 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 211.3 |
| 0.5 |
| 206.2 |
| 4.2 |
| 210.9 |
| | 164.0 |
| 0.1 |
| 160.0 |
| 3.5 |
| 163.6 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 19.6 |
| — |
| 19.6 |
| — |
| 19.6 |
| | 17.8 |
| — |
| 17.9 |
| — |
| 17.9 |
|
Long-term debt | 230.5 |
| — |
| 219.8 |
| 3.5 |
| 223.3 |
| | 215.5 |
| — |
| 218.3 |
| 3.5 |
| 221.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | Estimated fair value hierarchy | | | | Estimated fair value hierarchy | |
(in billions) | Carrying value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value | | Carrying value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $ | 21.2 |
| $ | 21.2 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 21.2 |
| | $ | 22.3 |
| $ | 22.3 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 22.3 |
|
Deposits with banks | 235.4 |
| 235.4 |
| — |
| — |
| 235.4 |
| | 256.5 |
| 256.5 |
| — |
| — |
| 256.5 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable | 87.9 |
| — |
| 87.9 |
| — |
| 87.9 |
| | 72.0 |
| — |
| 71.9 |
| 0.1 |
| 72.0 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 243.7 |
| — |
| 243.7 |
| — |
| 243.7 |
| | 308.4 |
| — |
| 308.4 |
| — |
| 308.4 |
|
Securities borrowed | 132.6 |
| — |
| 132.6 |
| — |
| 132.6 |
| | 106.9 |
| — |
| 106.9 |
| — |
| 106.9 |
|
Investment securities, held-to-maturity | 40.8 |
| — |
| 42.4 |
| — |
| 42.4 |
| | 31.4 |
| — |
| 31.5 |
| — |
| 31.5 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(a) | 926.2 |
| — |
| 218.9 |
| 720.7 |
| 939.6 |
| | 968.0 |
| — |
| 241.5 |
| 728.5 |
| 970.0 |
|
Other | 60.6 |
| — |
| 59.8 |
| 0.9 |
| 60.7 |
| | 60.5 |
| — |
| 59.6 |
| 1.0 |
| 60.6 |
|
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | $ | 1,495.9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,496.3 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,496.3 |
| | $ | 1,447.4 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,447.5 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,447.5 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 246.8 |
| — |
| 246.8 |
| — |
| 246.8 |
| | 181.4 |
| — |
| 181.4 |
| — |
| 181.4 |
|
Short-term borrowings | 42.4 |
| — |
| 42.4 |
| — |
| 42.4 |
| | 62.1 |
| — |
| 62.1 |
| — |
| 62.1 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 181.5 |
| 0.7 |
| 177.0 |
| 3.4 |
| 181.1 |
| | 160.6 |
| 0.2 |
| 157.0 |
| 3.0 |
| 160.2 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 18.5 |
| — |
| 18.5 |
| — |
| 18.5 |
| | 20.2 |
| — |
| 20.2 |
| — |
| 20.2 |
|
Long-term debt and junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures | 224.3 |
| — |
| 223.5 |
| 3.4 |
| 226.9 |
| | 227.1 |
| — |
| 224.6 |
| 3.3 |
| 227.9 |
|
| |
(a) | Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral. Carrying value of the loan takes into account the loan’s allowance for loan losses, which represents the loan’s expected credit losses over its remaining expected life. The difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a financial asset or liabilityloan is the result of the different methodologies usedgenerally attributable to determinechanges in market interest rates, including credit spreads, market liquidity premiums and other factors that affect the fair value as compared withof a loan but do not affect its carrying value. For example, credit losses are estimated for a financial asset’s remaining life in a fair value calculation but are estimated for a loss emergence period in the allowance for loan loss calculation; future loan income (interest and fees) is incorporated in a fair value calculation but is generally not considered in the allowance for loan losses. |
The majority of the Firm’s lending-related commitments are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value of the wholesale allowance for lending-related commitments and the estimated fair value of these wholesale lending-related commitments were as follows for the periods indicated.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | Estimated fair value hierarchy | | | | Estimated fair value hierarchy | | | Estimated fair value hierarchy | | | | Estimated fair value hierarchy | |
(in billions) | Carrying value(a) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value | | Carrying value(a) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value(b) | Carrying value(a) (b) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value | | Carrying value(a) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total estimated fair value |
Wholesale lending-related commitments | $ | 1.1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1.9 |
| $ | 1.9 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1.9 |
| $ | 1.9 |
| $ | 2.8 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3.3 |
| $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1.9 |
| $ | 1.9 |
|
| |
(a) | Excludes the current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset, each of which is recognized at fair value at the inception of the guarantees. |
| |
(b) | The prior period amounts have been revisedIncludes the wholesale allowance for lending-related commitments and markdowns associated with held-for-sale positions related to conform withunfunded commitments in the current period presentation.bridge financing portfolio. |
The Firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. In many cases, the Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases as permitted by law, without notice. Refer to page 161156 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments.
Note 3 – Fair value option
Refer to Note 3 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of the primary financial instruments for which theThe fair value option wasprovides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments.
The Firm has elected to measure certain instruments at fair value for several reasons including to mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences between the measurement basis of elected instruments (e.g., certain instruments that otherwise would be accounted for those electionson an accrual basis) and the determinationassociated risk management arrangements that are accounted for on a fair value basis, as well as to better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis.
The Firm’s election of instrument-specificfair value includes the following instruments:
Loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity, subject to bifurcation accounting, or managed on a fair value basis, including lending-related commitments
Certain securities financing agreements
Owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit risk,derivatives, which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument
Structured notes, which are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives, that are issued as part of client-driven activities
Certain long-term beneficial interests issued by CIB’s consolidated securitization trusts where relevant.the underlying assets are carried at fair value
Changes in fair value under the fair value option election
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated statements of income for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, for items for which the fair value option was elected. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the financial instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management instruments, which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
(in millions) | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) | | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) | | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 543 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 543 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
|
Securities borrowed | 99 |
| | — |
| | 99 |
| | (24 | ) | | — |
| | (24 | ) | 226 |
| | — |
| | 226 |
| | 37 |
| | — |
| | 37 |
|
Trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans | 546 |
| | — |
| | 546 |
| | (45 | ) | | 5 |
| (c) | (40 | ) | (2,438 | ) | | (1 | ) | (c) | (2,439 | ) | | 1,354 |
| | — |
| | 1,354 |
|
Loans reported as trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk | 111 |
| | (4 | ) | (c) | 107 |
| | 122 |
| | 1 |
| (c) | 123 |
| (589 | ) | | (23 | ) | (c) | (612 | ) | | 248 |
| | 3 |
| (c) | 251 |
|
Other changes in fair value | 74 |
| | 320 |
| (c) | 394 |
| | (6 | ) | | 49 |
| (c) | 43 |
| 275 |
| | 741 |
| (c) | 1,016 |
| | 80 |
| | 237 |
| (c) | 317 |
|
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) | | 5 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Other changes in fair value | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| 19 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other assets | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) | | 2 |
| | 16 |
| (d) | 18 |
| 61 |
| | (17 | ) | (d) | 44 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Deposits(a) | (397 | ) | | — |
| | (397 | ) | | 32 |
| | — |
| | 32 |
| (103 | ) | | — |
| | (103 | ) | | (496 | ) | | — |
| | (496 | ) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| (259 | ) | | — |
| | (259 | ) | | (5 | ) | | — |
| | (5 | ) |
Short-term borrowings(a) | 173 |
| | — |
| | 173 |
| | (25 | ) | | — |
| | (25 | ) | 1,720 |
| | — |
| | 1,720 |
| | (704 | ) | | — |
| | (704 | ) |
Trading liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
Other liabilities | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| (35 | ) | | — |
| | (35 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) |
Long-term debt(a)(b) | (614 | ) | | — |
| | (614 | ) | | 259 |
| | — |
| | 259 |
| 4,181 |
| | 5 |
| (c) | 4,186 |
| | (2,836 | ) | | — |
| | (2,836 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
(in millions) | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) | | Principal transactions | | All other income | Total changes in fair value recorded (e) |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | 10 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10 |
| | | $ | (49 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (49 | ) |
Securities borrowed | 179 |
| | — |
| | 179 |
| | | (22 | ) | | — |
| | (22 | ) |
Trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans | 2,104 |
| | — |
| | 2,104 |
| | | (490 | ) | | 6 |
| (c) | (484 | ) |
Loans reported as trading assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk | 558 |
| | 1 |
| (c) | 559 |
| | | 458 |
| | 5 |
| (c) | 463 |
|
Other changes in fair value | 274 |
| | 885 |
| (c) | 1,159 |
| | | 64 |
| | 24 |
| (c) | 88 |
|
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk | (12 | ) | | — |
| | (12 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Other changes in fair value | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Other assets | (3 | ) | | 3 |
| (d) | — |
| | | 4 |
| | 6 |
| (d) | 10 |
|
Deposits(a) | (1,589 | ) | | — |
| | (1,589 | ) | | | 371 |
| | — |
| | 371 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | (18 | ) | | — |
| | (18 | ) | | | 27 |
| | — |
| | 27 |
|
Short-term borrowings(a) | (601 | ) | | — |
| | (601 | ) | | | 86 |
| | — |
| | 86 |
|
Trading liabilities | 5 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Other liabilities | (7 | ) | | — |
| | (7 | ) | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Long-term debt(a)(b) | (5,220 | ) | | — |
| | (5,220 | ) | | | 1,486 |
| | — |
| | 1,486 |
|
| |
(a) | Unrealized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk (DVA) for liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected isare recorded in OCI, while realized gains/(losses) are recorded in principal transactions revenue. Realized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk recorded in principal transactions revenue were not$(2) million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and were 0t material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.March, 31, 2019. |
| |
(b) | Long-term debt measured at fair value predominantly relates to structured notes. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains/(losses) reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of the risk management instruments used to manage such risk. |
| |
(c) | Reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
| |
(d) | Reported in other income. |
| |
(e) | Changes in fair value exclude contractual interest, which is included in interest income and interest expense for all instruments other than hybrid financial instruments. Refer to Note 67 for further information regarding interest income and interest expense. |
Difference between aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, for loans, long-term debt and long-term beneficial interests for which the fair value option has been elected.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Contractual principal outstanding |
| Fair value | Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding | | Contractual principal outstanding | | Fair value | Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding | Contractual principal outstanding |
| Fair value | Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding | | Contractual principal outstanding | | Fair value | Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding |
Loans(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
Loans reported as trading assets | $ | 3,884 |
|
| $ | 1,151 |
| $ | (2,733 | ) | | $ | 4,240 |
| | $ | 1,350 |
| $ | (2,890 | ) | $ | 3,610 |
|
| $ | 1,092 |
| $ | (2,518 | ) | | $ | 3,717 |
| | $ | 1,111 |
| $ | (2,606 | ) |
Loans | 181 |
|
| 151 |
| (30 | ) | | 39 |
| | — |
| (39 | ) | 274 |
|
| 238 |
| (36 | ) | | 178 |
| | 139 |
| (39 | ) |
Subtotal | 4,065 |
|
| 1,302 |
| (2,763 | ) | | 4,279 |
| | 1,350 |
| (2,929 | ) | 3,884 |
|
| 1,330 |
| (2,554 | ) | | 3,895 |
| | 1,250 |
| (2,645 | ) |
All other performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
Loans reported as trading assets | 45,315 |
|
| 43,903 |
| (1,412 | ) | | 42,215 |
| | 40,403 |
| (1,812 | ) | 47,193 |
|
| 45,016 |
| (2,177 | ) | | 48,570 |
| | 47,318 |
| (1,252 | ) |
Loans | 5,686 |
|
| 5,609 |
| (77 | ) | | 3,186 |
| | 3,151 |
| (35 | ) | 6,047 |
|
| 5,976 |
| (71 | ) | | 7,046 |
| | 6,965 |
| (81 | ) |
Total loans | $ | 55,066 |
|
| $ | 50,814 |
| $ | (4,252 | ) | | $ | 49,680 |
| | $ | 44,904 |
| $ | (4,776 | ) | $ | 57,124 |
|
| $ | 52,322 |
| $ | (4,802 | ) | | $ | 59,511 |
| | $ | 55,533 |
| $ | (3,978 | ) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
Principal-protected debt | $ | 40,750 |
| (c) | $ | 37,635 |
| $ | (3,115 | ) | | $ | 32,674 |
| (c) | $ | 28,718 |
| $ | (3,956 | ) | $ | 40,994 |
| (c) | $ | 37,947 |
| $ | (3,047 | ) | | $ | 40,124 |
| (c) | $ | 39,246 |
| $ | (878 | ) |
Nonprincipal-protected debt(b) | NA |
|
| 34,322 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | 26,168 |
| NA |
| NA |
|
| 30,670 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | 36,499 |
| NA |
|
Total long-term debt | NA |
|
| $ | 71,957 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 54,886 |
| NA |
| NA |
|
| $ | 68,617 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 75,745 |
| NA |
|
Long-term beneficial interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonprincipal-protected debt(b) | NA |
|
| $ | 39 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 28 |
| NA |
| NA |
|
| $ | 77 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 36 |
| NA |
|
Total long-term beneficial interests | NA |
|
| $ | 39 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 28 |
| NA |
| NA |
|
| $ | 77 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | $ | 36 |
| NA |
|
| |
(a) | There were 0 performing loans that were ninety days or more past due as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests. Unlike principal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, nonprincipal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but for structured notes to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. However, investors are exposed to the credit risk of the Firm as issuer for both nonprincipal-protected and principal-protected notes. |
| |
(c) | Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflects the contractual principal payment at maturity or, if applicable, the contractual principal payment at the Firm’s next call date. |
At September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the contractual amount of lending-related commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $6.5$7.3 billion and $6.9$6.5 billion, respectively, with a corresponding fair value of $(91)$(97) million and $(82)$(94) million, respectively. Refer to Note 2728 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K, and Note 2223 of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments. The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation.
Structured note products by balance sheet classification and risk component
The following table presents the fair value of structured notes, by balance sheet classification and the primary risk type.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Long-term debt | Short-term borrowings | Deposits | Total | | Long-term debt | Short-term borrowings | Deposits | Total | Long-term debt | Short-term borrowings | Deposits | Total | | Long-term debt | Short-term borrowings | Deposits | Total |
Risk exposure | | | | | | |
Interest rate | $ | 33,402 |
| $ | 54 |
| $ | 17,547 |
| $ | 51,003 |
| | $ | 24,137 |
| $ | 62 |
| $ | 12,372 |
| $ | 36,571 |
| $ | 35,203 |
| $ | 38 |
| $ | 11,699 |
| $ | 46,940 |
| | $ | 35,470 |
| $ | 34 |
| $ | 16,692 |
| $ | 52,196 |
|
Credit | 5,207 |
| 817 |
| — |
| 6,024 |
| | 4,009 |
| 995 |
| — |
| 5,004 |
| 4,749 |
| 771 |
| — |
| 5,520 |
| | 5,715 |
| 875 |
| — |
| 6,590 |
|
Foreign exchange | 3,570 |
| 45 |
| 8 |
| 3,623 |
| | 3,169 |
| 157 |
| 38 |
| 3,364 |
| 3,596 |
| 67 |
| 54 |
| 3,717 |
| | 3,862 |
| 48 |
| 5 |
| 3,915 |
|
Equity | 27,644 |
| 5,565 |
| 8,190 |
| 41,399 |
| | 21,382 |
| 5,422 |
| 7,368 |
| 34,172 |
| 23,983 |
| 4,177 |
| 7,455 |
| 35,615 |
| | 29,294 |
| 4,852 |
| 8,177 |
| 42,323 |
|
Commodity | 504 |
| 7 |
| 1,352 |
| 1,863 |
| | 372 |
| 34 |
| 1,207 |
| 1,613 |
| 419 |
| 25 |
| 1,140 |
| 1,584 |
| | 472 |
| 32 |
| 1,454 |
| 1,958 |
|
Total structured notes | $ | 70,327 |
| $ | 6,488 |
| $ | 27,097 |
| $ | 103,912 |
| | $ | 53,069 |
| $ | 6,670 |
| $ | 20,985 |
| $ | 80,724 |
| $ | 67,950 |
| $ | 5,078 |
| $ | 20,348 |
| $ | 93,376 |
| | $ | 74,813 |
| $ | 5,841 |
| $ | 26,328 |
| $ | 106,982 |
|
Note 4 – Credit risk concentrations
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients, counterparties or customers are engaged in similar business activities or activities in the same geographic region, or when they have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions.
JPMorgan Chase regularly monitors various segments of its credit portfolios to assess potential credit risk concentrations and to obtain additional collateral when deemed necessary and permitted under the Firm’s agreements. Senior management is significantly involved in the credit approval and review process, and risk levels are adjusted as needed to reflect the Firm’s risk appetite.
In the Firm’s consumer portfolio, concentrations are managed primarily by product and by U.S. geographic region, with a key focus on trends and concentrations at the portfolio level, where potential credit risk concentrations can be remedied through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the geographic composition of the Firm’s consumer loan portfolios. In the wholesale portfolio, credit risk concentrations are evaluated primarily by industry and monitored regularly on both an aggregate portfolio level and on an individual client or counterparty basis.
The Firm’s wholesale exposure is managed through loan syndications and participations, loan sales, securitizations, credit derivatives, master netting agreements, collateral and other risk-reduction techniques. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on loans.
The Firm does not believe that its exposure to any particular loan product or industry segment (e.g., real estate), or its exposure to residential real estate loans with high LTV ratios, results in a significant concentration of credit risk.
Terms of loan products and collateral coverage are included in the Firm’s assessment when extending credit and establishing its allowance for loan losses.
The table below presents both on–balance sheet and off–balance sheet consumer and wholesale-related credit exposure by the Firm’s 3 credit portfolio segments as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The wholesale industry of risk category is generally based on the client or counterparty’s primary business activity.
In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 | |
| Credit exposure(h) | On-balance sheet | Off-balance sheet(i) | | Credit exposure(h) | On-balance sheet | Off-balance sheet(i) | |
(in millions) | Loans | Derivatives | | Loans | Derivatives | |
Consumer, excluding credit card | $ | 337,162 |
| $ | 295,627 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 41,535 |
| | $ | 338,170 |
| $ | 298,001 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 40,169 |
| |
Credit card(a) | 835,463 |
| 154,021 |
| — |
| 681,442 |
| | 819,644 |
| 168,924 |
| — |
| 650,720 |
| |
Total consumer-related(a) | 1,172,625 |
| 449,648 |
| — |
| 722,977 |
| | 1,157,814 |
| 466,925 |
| — |
| 690,889 |
| |
Wholesale-related(b) | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate | 148,246 |
| 123,667 |
| 1,294 |
| 23,285 |
| | 150,805 |
| 117,709 |
| 619 |
| 32,477 |
| |
Consumer & Retail | 110,669 |
| 54,207 |
| 2,824 |
| 53,638 |
| | 106,986 |
| 36,985 |
| 1,424 |
| 68,577 |
| |
Individuals and Individual Entities(c) | 108,180 |
| 97,020 |
| 1,864 |
| 9,296 |
| | 105,018 |
| 94,616 |
| 694 |
| 9,708 |
| |
Industrials | 68,864 |
| 29,941 |
| 2,062 |
| 36,861 |
| | 62,483 |
| 22,063 |
| 878 |
| 39,542 |
| |
Asset Managers | 65,880 |
| 29,134 |
| 17,395 |
| 19,351 |
| | 51,856 |
| 24,008 |
| 7,160 |
| 20,688 |
| |
Technology, Media & Telecommunications | 60,184 |
| 20,363 |
| 2,827 |
| 36,994 |
| | 60,033 |
| 15,322 |
| 2,766 |
| 41,945 |
| |
Banks & Finance Cos | 55,786 |
| 34,760 |
| 7,617 |
| 13,409 |
| | 50,786 |
| 31,191 |
| 5,165 |
| 14,430 |
| |
Healthcare | 53,250 |
| 20,628 |
| 2,806 |
| 29,816 |
| | 50,824 |
| 17,607 |
| 2,078 |
| 31,139 |
| |
Oil & Gas | 42,754 |
| 15,734 |
| 837 |
| 26,183 |
| | 41,641 |
| 13,101 |
| 852 |
| 27,688 |
| |
Automotive | 36,060 |
| 22,644 |
| 1,076 |
| 12,340 |
| | 35,118 |
| 18,844 |
| 368 |
| 15,906 |
| |
Utilities | 33,112 |
| 7,813 |
| 3,734 |
| 21,565 |
| | 34,843 |
| 5,157 |
| 2,573 |
| 27,113 |
| |
State & Municipal Govt(d) | 30,529 |
| 14,686 |
| 2,670 |
| 13,173 |
| | 30,095 |
| 13,271 |
| 2,000 |
| 14,824 |
| |
Transportation | 18,624 |
| 8,584 |
| 2,305 |
| 7,735 |
| | 14,497 |
| 5,253 |
| 715 |
| 8,529 |
| |
Chemicals & Plastics | 17,430 |
| 6,445 |
| 752 |
| 10,233 |
| | 17,499 |
| 4,864 |
| 459 |
| 12,176 |
| |
Central Govt | 16,519 |
| 3,223 |
| 12,107 |
| 1,189 |
| | 14,865 |
| 2,840 |
| 10,477 |
| 1,548 |
| |
Metals & Mining | 15,797 |
| 6,479 |
| 998 |
| 8,320 |
| | 15,586 |
| 5,364 |
| 402 |
| 9,820 |
| |
Insurance | 14,522 |
| 2,213 |
| 3,675 |
| 8,634 |
| | 12,348 |
| 1,356 |
| 2,282 |
| 8,710 |
| |
Financial Markets Infrastructure | 9,767 |
| 409 |
| 7,597 |
| 1,761 |
| | 4,121 |
| 13 |
| 2,482 |
| 1,626 |
| |
Securities Firms | 8,045 |
| 663 |
| 4,718 |
| 2,664 |
| | 7,344 |
| 757 |
| 4,507 |
| 2,080 |
| |
All other(e) | 81,204 |
| 56,676 |
| 2,490 |
| 22,038 |
| | 78,006 |
| 51,357 |
| 1,865 |
| 24,784 |
| |
Subtotal | 995,422 |
| 555,289 |
| 81,648 |
| 358,485 |
| | 944,754 |
| 481,678 |
| 49,766 |
| 413,310 |
| |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value | 10,438 |
| 10,438 |
| — |
| — |
| | 11,166 |
| 11,166 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Receivables from customers and other(f) | 33,376 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 33,706 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Total wholesale-related | 1,039,236 |
| 565,727 |
| 81,648 |
| 358,485 |
| | 989,626 |
| 492,844 |
| 49,766 |
| 413,310 |
| |
Total exposure(g)(h) | $ | 2,211,861 |
| $ | 1,015,375 |
| $ | 81,648 |
| $ | 1,081,462 |
| | $ | 2,147,440 |
| $ | 959,769 |
| $ | 49,766 |
| $ | 1,104,199 |
| |
| |
(a) | Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CB and CIB. |
| |
(b) | The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2019, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at March 31, 2020, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2019. |
| |
(c) | Individuals and Individual Entities predominantly consists of Wealth Management clients within AWM and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts. |
| |
(d) | In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, noted above, the Firm held: $6.5 billion at both periods of trading assets; $30.5 billion and $29.8 billion, respectively, of AFS securities; and $4.8 billion at both periods of HTM securities, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. Refer to Note 2 and Note 10 for further information. |
| |
(e) | All other includes: SPEs and Private education and civic organizations, representing approximately 90% and 10%, respectively, at both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Refer to Note 14 for more information on exposures to SPEs. |
| |
(f) | Receivables from customers primarily represent held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (e.g., cash on deposit, liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities), as such no allowance is held against these receivables. To manage its credit risk the Firm establishes margin requirements and monitors the required margin levels on an ongoing basis, and requires clients to deposit additional cash or other collateral, or to reduce positions, when appropriate. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(g) | Excludes cash placed with banks of $354.4 billion and $254.0 billion, at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, which is predominantly placed with various central banks, primarily Federal Reserve Banks. |
| |
(h) | Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities held against derivative receivables or loans and liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables. |
| |
(i) | Represents lending-related financial instruments. |
Note 5 – Derivative instruments
JPMorgan Chase makes markets in derivatives for clients and also uses derivatives to hedge or manage its own risk exposures. Refer to Note 5 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of the Firm’s use of and accounting policies regarding derivative instruments.
The Firm’s disclosures are based on the accounting treatment and purpose of these derivatives. A limited number of the Firm’s derivatives are designated in hedge
accounting relationships and are disclosed according to the type of hedge (fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or net investment hedge). Derivatives not designated in hedge accounting relationships include certain derivatives that are used to manage certain risks associated with specified assets orand liabilities (“specified risk management” positions) as well as derivatives used in the Firm’s market-making businesses or for other purposes.
The following table outlines the Firm’s primary uses of derivatives and the related hedge accounting designation or disclosure category.
|
| | | | |
Type of Derivative | Use of Derivative | Designation and disclosure | Affected segment or unit | 10-Q page reference |
Manage specifically identified risk exposures in qualifying hedge accounting relationships: | | | |
| Hedge fixed rate assets and liabilities | Fair value hedge | Corporate | 109-110 |
| Hedge floating-rate assets and liabilities | Cash flow hedge | Corporate | 111 |
| Hedge foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities | Fair value hedge | Corporate | 109-110 |
| Hedge foreign currency-denominated forecasted revenue and expense | Cash flow hedge | Corporate | 111 |
| Hedge the value of the Firm’s investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency entities | Net investment hedge | Corporate | 112 |
| Hedge commodity inventory | Fair value hedge | CIB | 109-110 |
Manage specifically identified risk exposures not designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships: | | | |
| Manage the risk of theassociated with mortgage pipeline,commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs | Specified risk management | CCB | 112 |
| Manage the credit risk ofassociated with wholesale lending exposures | Specified risk management | CIB | 112 |
• Interest rate and foreign exchange | Manage the risk ofassociated with certain other specified assets and liabilities | Specified risk management | Corporate | 112 |
Market-making derivatives and other activities: | | | |
| Market-making and related risk management | Market-making and other | CIB | 112 |
| Other derivatives | Market-making and other | CIB, AWM, Corporate | 112 |
Notional amount of derivative contracts
The following table summarizes the notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding as of September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | | Notional amounts(b) | Notional amounts(b) |
(in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Interest rate contracts | | |
Swaps | $ | 25,099 |
| $ | 21,763 |
| $ | 27,659 |
| $ | 21,228 |
|
Futures and forwards | 4,887 |
| 3,562 |
| 7,504 |
| 3,152 |
|
Written options | 4,290 |
| 3,997 |
| 3,889 |
| 3,938 |
|
Purchased options | 4,697 |
| 4,322 |
| 4,277 |
| 4,361 |
|
Total interest rate contracts | 38,973 |
| 33,644 |
| 43,329 |
| 32,679 |
|
Credit derivatives(a) | 1,365 |
| 1,501 |
| 1,560 |
| 1,242 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | | |
Cross-currency swaps | 3,886 |
| 3,548 |
| 3,604 |
| 3,604 |
|
Spot, futures and forwards | 7,111 |
| 5,871 |
| 7,518 |
| 5,577 |
|
Written options | 832 |
| 835 |
| 838 |
| 700 |
|
Purchased options | 852 |
| 830 |
| 821 |
| 718 |
|
Total foreign exchange contracts | 12,681 |
| 11,084 |
| 12,781 |
| 10,599 |
|
Equity contracts | | |
Swaps | 389 |
| 346 |
| 330 |
| 406 |
|
Futures and forwards | 131 |
| 101 |
| 122 |
| 142 |
|
Written options | 692 |
| 528 |
| 720 |
| 646 |
|
Purchased options | 632 |
| 490 |
| 683 |
| 611 |
|
Total equity contracts | 1,844 |
| 1,465 |
| 1,855 |
| 1,805 |
|
Commodity contracts | | |
Swaps | 148 |
| 134 |
| 139 |
| 147 |
|
Spot, futures and forwards | 218 |
| 156 |
| 219 |
| 211 |
|
Written options | 166 |
| 135 |
| 169 |
| 135 |
|
Purchased options | 153 |
| 120 |
| 155 |
| 124 |
|
Total commodity contracts | 685 |
| 545 |
| 682 |
| 617 |
|
Total derivative notional amounts | $ | 55,548 |
| $ | 48,239 |
| $ | 60,207 |
| $ | 46,942 |
|
| |
(a) | Refer to the Credit derivatives discussion on page 113 for more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts. |
| |
(b) | Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts. |
While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firm’s derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firm’s view, the possible losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative contracts, the notional amount is not exchanged; it is used simply as a reference amount used to calculate payments.
Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated balance sheets
The following table summarizes information on derivative receivables and payables (before and after netting adjustments) that are reflected on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, by accounting designation (e.g., whether the derivatives were designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships or not) and contract type.
| | Free-standing derivative receivables and payables(a) | Free-standing derivative receivables and payables(a) | | | | | | | | | | | Free-standing derivative receivables and payables(a) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross derivative receivables | | | | Gross derivative payables | | | Gross derivative receivables | | | | Gross derivative payables | | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative receivables | | Net derivative receivables(b) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative payables | | Net derivative payables(b) | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative receivables | | Net derivative receivables(b) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative payables | | Net derivative payables(b) |
Trading assets and liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | $ | 375,082 |
| | $ | 851 |
| | $ | 375,933 |
| | $ | 28,507 |
| | $ | 338,711 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 338,713 |
| | $ | 10,223 |
| $ | 401,677 |
| | $ | 826 |
| | $ | 402,503 |
| | $ | 36,901 |
| | $ | 365,052 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 365,053 |
| | $ | 13,399 |
|
Credit | 15,717 |
| | — |
| | 15,717 |
| | 838 |
| | 17,062 |
| | — |
| | 17,062 |
| | 2,159 |
| 20,080 |
| | — |
| | 20,080 |
| | 1,185 |
| | 20,878 |
| | — |
| | 20,878 |
| | 2,112 |
|
Foreign exchange | 162,364 |
| | 768 |
| | 163,132 |
| | 12,681 |
| | 164,583 |
| | 1,159 |
| | 165,742 |
| | 15,016 |
| 241,466 |
| | 2,056 |
| | 243,522 |
| | 18,983 |
| | 255,304 |
| | 739 |
| | 256,043 |
| | 23,294 |
|
Equity | 46,378 |
| | — |
| | 46,378 |
| | 7,409 |
| | 50,891 |
| | — |
| | 50,891 |
| | 10,603 |
| 96,145 |
| | — |
| | 96,145 |
| | 13,215 |
| | 94,202 |
| | — |
| | 94,202 |
| | 12,037 |
|
Commodity | 20,985 |
| | 253 |
| | 21,238 |
| | 6,142 |
| | 25,470 |
| | 341 |
| | 25,811 |
| | 9,789 |
| 35,960 |
| | 1,695 |
| | 37,655 |
| | 11,364 |
| | 39,069 |
| | 931 |
| | 40,000 |
| | 14,245 |
|
Total fair value of trading assets and liabilities | $ | 620,526 |
| | $ | 1,872 |
| | $ | 622,398 |
| | $ | 55,577 |
| | $ | 596,717 |
| | $ | 1,502 |
| | $ | 598,219 |
| | $ | 47,790 |
| $ | 795,328 |
| | $ | 4,577 |
| | $ | 799,905 |
| | $ | 81,648 |
| | $ | 774,505 |
| | $ | 1,671 |
| | $ | 776,176 |
| | $ | 65,087 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross derivative receivables | | | | Gross derivative payables | | | Gross derivative receivables | | | | Gross derivative payables | | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative receivables | | Net derivative receivables(b) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative payables | | Net derivative payables(b) | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative receivables | | Net derivative receivables(b) | | Not designated as hedges | | Designated as hedges | | Total derivative payables | | Net derivative payables(b) |
Trading assets and liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate | $ | 267,871 |
| | $ | 833 |
| | $ | 268,704 |
| | $ | 23,214 |
| | $ | 242,782 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 242,782 |
| | $ | 7,784 |
| $ | 312,451 |
| | $ | 843 |
| | $ | 313,294 |
| | $ | 27,421 |
| | $ | 279,272 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 279,273 |
| | $ | 8,603 |
|
Credit | 20,095 |
| | — |
| | 20,095 |
| | 612 |
| | 20,276 |
| | — |
| | 20,276 |
| | 1,667 |
| 14,876 |
| | — |
| | 14,876 |
| | 701 |
| | 15,121 |
| | — |
| | 15,121 |
| | 1,652 |
|
Foreign exchange | 167,057 |
| | 628 |
| | 167,685 |
| | 13,450 |
| | 164,392 |
| | 825 |
| | 165,217 |
| | 12,785 |
| 138,179 |
| | 308 |
| | 138,487 |
| | 9,005 |
| | 144,125 |
| | 983 |
| | 145,108 |
| | 13,158 |
|
Equity | 49,285 |
| | — |
| | 49,285 |
| | 9,946 |
| | 51,195 |
| | — |
| | 51,195 |
| | 10,161 |
| 45,727 |
| | — |
| | 45,727 |
| | 6,477 |
| | 52,741 |
| | — |
| | 52,741 |
| | 12,537 |
|
Commodity | 20,223 |
| | 247 |
| | 20,470 |
| | 6,991 |
| | 22,297 |
| | 121 |
| | 22,418 |
| | 9,372 |
| 16,914 |
| | 328 |
| | 17,242 |
| | 6,162 |
| | 19,736 |
| | 149 |
| | 19,885 |
| | 7,758 |
|
Total fair value of trading assets and liabilities | $ | 524,531 |
| | $ | 1,708 |
| | $ | 526,239 |
| | $ | 54,213 |
| | $ | 500,942 |
| | $ | 946 |
| | $ | 501,888 |
| | $ | 41,769 |
| $ | 528,147 |
| | $ | 1,479 |
| | $ | 529,626 |
| | $ | 49,766 |
| | $ | 510,995 |
| | $ | 1,133 |
| | $ | 512,128 |
| | $ | 43,708 |
|
| |
(a) | Balances exclude structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 for further information. |
| |
(b) | As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral receivables and payables when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. |
Derivatives netting
The following tables present, as of September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, 2019, gross and net derivative receivables and payables by contract and settlement type. Derivative receivables and payables, as well as the related cash collateral from the same counterparty have been netted on the Consolidated balance sheets where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement. Where such a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, amounts are not eligible for netting on the Consolidated balance sheets, and those derivative receivables and payables are shown separately in the tables below.
In addition to the cash collateral received and transferred that is presented on a net basis with derivative receivables and payables, the Firm receives and transfers additional collateral (financial instruments and cash). These amounts mitigate counterparty credit risk associated with the Firm’s derivative instruments, but are not eligible for net presentation:
| |
• | collateral that consists of non-cash financial instruments (generally U.S. government and agency securities and other G7 government securities) and cash collateral held at third-party custodians, which are shown separately as “Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets” in the tables below, up to the fair value exposure amount.amount; |
| |
• | the amount of collateral held or transferred that exceeds the fair value exposure at the individual counterparty level, as of the date presented, which is excluded from the tables below; and |
| |
• | collateral held or transferred that relates to derivative receivables or payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained with respect to the master netting agreement, which is excluded from the tables below. |
| | | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | (in millions) | Gross derivative receivables | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative receivables | | Gross derivative receivables | | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative receivables | (in millions) | Gross derivative receivables | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative receivables | | Gross derivative receivables | | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative receivables |
U.S. GAAP nettable derivative receivables | U.S. GAAP nettable derivative receivables | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. GAAP nettable derivative receivables | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts: | Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
Over-the-counter (“OTC”) | Over-the-counter (“OTC”) | $ | 356,075 |
| $ | (332,566 | ) | | $ | 23,509 |
| | $ | 258,227 |
| | $ | (239,498 | ) | | $ | 18,729 |
| | Over-the-counter (“OTC”) | $ | 378,111 |
| $ | (348,926 | ) | | $ | 29,185 |
| | $ | 299,205 |
| | $ | (276,255 | ) | | $ | 22,950 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 14,438 |
| (14,343 | ) | | 95 |
| | 6,404 |
| | (5,856 | ) | | 548 |
| | OTC–cleared | 15,768 |
| (15,527 | ) | | 241 |
| | 9,442 |
| | (9,360 | ) | | 82 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 577 |
| (517 | ) | | 60 |
| | 322 |
| | (136 | ) | | 186 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 1,381 |
| (1,149 | ) | | 232 |
| | 347 |
| | (258 | ) | | 89 |
| |
Total interest rate contracts | Total interest rate contracts | 371,090 |
| (347,426 | ) | | 23,664 |
| | 264,953 |
| | (245,490 | ) | | 19,463 |
| | Total interest rate contracts | 395,260 |
| (365,602 | ) | | 29,658 |
| | 308,994 |
| | (285,873 | ) | | 23,121 |
| |
Credit contracts: | Credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 11,168 |
| (10,682 | ) | | 486 |
| | 12,648 |
| | (12,261 | ) | | 387 |
| | OTC | 16,918 |
| (16,106 | ) | | 812 |
| | 10,743 |
| | (10,317 | ) | | 426 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 4,321 |
| (4,197 | ) | | 124 |
| | 7,267 |
| | (7,222 | ) | | 45 |
| | OTC–cleared | 2,828 |
| (2,789 | ) | | 39 |
| | 3,864 |
| | (3,858 | ) | | 6 |
| |
Total credit contracts | Total credit contracts | 15,489 |
| (14,879 | ) | | 610 |
| | 19,915 |
| | (19,483 | ) | | 432 |
| | Total credit contracts | 19,746 |
| (18,895 | ) | | 851 |
| | 14,607 |
| | (14,175 | ) | | 432 |
| |
Foreign exchange contracts: | Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 160,181 |
| (150,271 | ) | | 9,910 |
| | 163,862 |
| | (153,988 | ) | | 9,874 |
| | OTC | 236,738 |
| (223,245 | ) | | 13,493 |
| | 136,252 |
| | (129,324 | ) | | 6,928 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 176 |
| (174 | ) | | 2 |
| | 235 |
| | (226 | ) | | 9 |
| | OTC–cleared | 1,363 |
| (1,287 | ) | | 76 |
| | 185 |
| | (152 | ) | | 33 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 20 |
| (6 | ) | | 14 |
| | 32 |
| | (21 | ) | | 11 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 70 |
| (7 | ) | | 63 |
| | 10 |
| | (6 | ) | | 4 |
| |
Total foreign exchange contracts | Total foreign exchange contracts | 160,377 |
| (150,451 | ) | | 9,926 |
| | 164,129 |
| | (154,235 | ) | | 9,894 |
| | Total foreign exchange contracts | 238,171 |
| (224,539 | ) | | 13,632 |
| | 136,447 |
| | (129,482 | ) | | 6,965 |
| |
Equity contracts: | Equity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Equity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 22,195 |
| (20,281 | ) | | 1,914 |
| | 26,178 |
| | (23,879 | ) | | 2,299 |
| | OTC | 48,813 |
| (44,174 | ) | | 4,639 |
| | 23,106 |
| | (20,820 | ) | | 2,286 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 21,678 |
| (18,688 | ) | | 2,990 |
| | 18,876 |
| | (15,460 | ) | | 3,416 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 43,646 |
| (38,756 | ) | | 4,890 |
| | 19,654 |
| | (18,430 | ) | | 1,224 |
| |
Total equity contracts | Total equity contracts | 43,873 |
| (38,969 | ) | | 4,904 |
| | 45,054 |
| | (39,339 | ) | | 5,715 |
| | Total equity contracts | 92,459 |
| (82,930 | ) | | 9,529 |
| | 42,760 |
| | (39,250 | ) | | 3,510 |
| |
Commodity contracts: | Commodity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Commodity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 7,714 |
| (5,954 | ) | | 1,760 |
| | 7,448 |
| | (5,261 | ) | | 2,187 |
| | OTC | 16,410 |
| (11,590 | ) | | 4,820 |
| | 7,093 |
| | (5,149 | ) | | 1,944 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 26 |
| (25 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | OTC–cleared | 34 |
| (34 | ) | | — |
| | 28 |
| | (28 | ) | | — |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 9,151 |
| (9,117 | ) | | 34 |
| | 8,815 |
| | (8,218 | ) | | 597 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 15,075 |
| (14,667 | ) | | 408 |
| | 6,154 |
| | (5,903 | ) | | 251 |
| |
Total commodity contracts | Total commodity contracts | 16,891 |
| (15,096 | ) | | 1,795 |
| | 16,263 |
| | (13,479 | ) | | 2,784 |
| | Total commodity contracts | 31,519 |
| (26,291 | ) | | 5,228 |
| | 13,275 |
| | (11,080 | ) | | 2,195 |
| |
Derivative receivables with appropriate legal opinion | Derivative receivables with appropriate legal opinion | 607,720 |
| (566,821 | ) | | 40,899 |
| (d) | 510,314 |
| | (472,026 | ) | | 38,288 |
| (d) | Derivative receivables with appropriate legal opinion | 777,155 |
| (718,257 | ) | | 58,898 |
| (d) | 516,083 |
| | (479,860 | ) | | 36,223 |
| (d) |
Derivative receivables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | Derivative receivables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | 14,678 |
| | | 14,678 |
| | 15,925 |
| | | | 15,925 |
| | Derivative receivables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | 22,750 |
| | | 22,750 |
| | 13,543 |
| | | | 13,543 |
| |
Total derivative receivables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | Total derivative receivables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | $ | 622,398 |
| | | $ | 55,577 |
| | $ | 526,239 |
| | | | $ | 54,213 |
| | Total derivative receivables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | $ | 799,905 |
| | | $ | 81,648 |
| | $ | 529,626 |
| | | | $ | 49,766 |
| |
Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | | | (13,224 | ) | | | | | | (13,046 | ) | | Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | | | (22,623 | ) | | | | | | (14,226 | ) | |
Net amounts | Net amounts | | | $ | 42,353 |
| | | | | | $ | 41,167 |
| | Net amounts | | | $ | 59,025 |
| | | | | | $ | 35,540 |
| |
| | | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | (in millions) | Gross derivative payables | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative payables | | Gross derivative payables | | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative payables | (in millions) | Gross derivative payables | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative payables | | Gross derivative payables | | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Net derivative payables |
U.S. GAAP nettable derivative payables | U.S. GAAP nettable derivative payables | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. GAAP nettable derivative payables | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts: | Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | $ | 321,553 |
| $ | (313,017 | ) | | $ | 8,536 |
| | $ | 233,404 |
| | $ | (228,369 | ) | | $ | 5,035 |
| | OTC | $ | 343,787 |
| $ | (334,453 | ) | | $ | 9,334 |
| | $ | 267,311 |
| | $ | (260,229 | ) | | $ | 7,082 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 15,176 |
| (14,960 | ) | | 216 |
| | 7,163 |
| | (6,494 | ) | | 669 |
| | OTC–cleared | 16,701 |
| (16,051 | ) | | 650 |
| | 10,217 |
| | (10,138 | ) | | 79 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 585 |
| (513 | ) | | 72 |
| | 210 |
| | (135 | ) | | 75 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 1,410 |
| (1,150 | ) | | 260 |
| | 365 |
| | (303 | ) | | 62 |
| |
Total interest rate contracts | Total interest rate contracts | 337,314 |
| (328,490 | ) | | 8,824 |
| | 240,777 |
| | (234,998 | ) | | 5,779 |
| | Total interest rate contracts | 361,898 |
| (351,654 | ) | | 10,244 |
| | 277,893 |
| | (270,670 | ) | | 7,223 |
| |
Credit contracts: | Credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 13,130 |
| (11,254 | ) | | 1,876 |
| | 13,412 |
| | (11,895 | ) | | 1,517 |
| | OTC | 17,731 |
| (16,080 | ) | | 1,651 |
| | 11,570 |
| | (10,080 | ) | | 1,490 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 3,797 |
| (3,649 | ) | | 148 |
| | 6,716 |
| | (6,714 | ) | | 2 |
| | OTC–cleared | 2,691 |
| (2,686 | ) | | 5 |
| | 3,390 |
| | (3,389 | ) | | 1 |
| |
Total credit contracts | Total credit contracts | 16,927 |
| (14,903 | ) | | 2,024 |
| | 20,128 |
| | (18,609 | ) | | 1,519 |
| | Total credit contracts | 20,422 |
| (18,766 | ) | | 1,656 |
| | 14,960 |
| | (13,469 | ) | | 1,491 |
| |
Foreign exchange contracts: | Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 162,336 |
| (150,537 | ) | | 11,799 |
| | 160,930 |
| | (152,161 | ) | | 8,769 |
| | OTC | 249,340 |
| (231,457 | ) | | 17,883 |
| | 142,360 |
| | (131,792 | ) | | 10,568 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 190 |
| (185 | ) | | 5 |
| | 274 |
| | (268 | ) | | 6 |
| | OTC–cleared | 1,369 |
| (1,273 | ) | | 96 |
| | 186 |
| | (152 | ) | | 34 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 14 |
| (4 | ) | | 10 |
| | 16 |
| | (3 | ) | | 13 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 42 |
| (19 | ) | | 23 |
| | 12 |
| | (6 | ) | | 6 |
| |
Total foreign exchange contracts | Total foreign exchange contracts | 162,540 |
| (150,726 | ) | | 11,814 |
| | 161,220 |
| | (152,432 | ) | | 8,788 |
| | Total foreign exchange contracts | 250,751 |
| (232,749 | ) | | 18,002 |
| | 142,558 |
| | (131,950 | ) | | 10,608 |
| |
Equity contracts: | Equity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Equity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 27,010 |
| (21,600 | ) | | 5,410 |
| | 29,437 |
| | (25,544 | ) | | 3,893 |
| | OTC | 50,264 |
| (43,401 | ) | | 6,863 |
| | 27,594 |
| | (21,778 | ) | | 5,816 |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 20,365 |
| (18,688 | ) | | 1,677 |
| | 16,285 |
| | (15,490 | ) | | 795 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 39,581 |
| (38,764 | ) | | 817 |
| | 20,216 |
| | (18,426 | ) | | 1,790 |
| |
Total equity contracts | Total equity contracts | 47,375 |
| (40,288 | ) | | 7,087 |
| | 45,722 |
| | (41,034 | ) | | 4,688 |
| | Total equity contracts | 89,845 |
| (82,165 | ) | | 7,680 |
| | 47,810 |
| | (40,204 | ) | | 7,606 |
| |
Commodity contracts: | Commodity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | Commodity contracts: | | | | | | | | | | |
OTC | OTC | 10,450 |
| (6,874 | ) | | 3,576 |
| | 8,930 |
| | (4,838 | ) | | 4,092 |
| | OTC | 19,040 |
| (11,070 | ) | | 7,970 |
| | 8,714 |
| | (6,235 | ) | | 2,479 |
| |
OTC–cleared | OTC–cleared | 25 |
| (25 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | OTC–cleared | 39 |
| (39 | ) | | — |
| | 30 |
| | (30 | ) | | — |
| |
Exchange-traded(a) | Exchange-traded(a) | 10,004 |
| (9,123 | ) | | 881 |
| | 8,259 |
| | (8,208 | ) | | 51 |
| | Exchange-traded(a) | 14,838 |
| (14,646 | ) | | 192 |
| | 6,012 |
| | (5,862 | ) | | 150 |
| |
Total commodity contracts | Total commodity contracts | 20,479 |
| (16,022 | ) | | 4,457 |
| | 17,189 |
| | (13,046 | ) | | 4,143 |
| | Total commodity contracts | 33,917 |
| (25,755 | ) | | 8,162 |
| | 14,756 |
| | (12,127 | ) | | 2,629 |
| |
Derivative payables with appropriate legal opinion | Derivative payables with appropriate legal opinion | 584,635 |
| (550,429 | ) | | 34,206 |
| (d) | 485,036 |
| | (460,119 | ) | | 24,917 |
| (d) | Derivative payables with appropriate legal opinion | 756,833 |
| (711,089 | ) | | 45,744 |
| (d) | 497,977 |
| | (468,420 | ) | | 29,557 |
| (d) |
Derivative payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | Derivative payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | 13,584 |
| | | 13,584 |
| | 16,852 |
| | | | 16,852 |
| | Derivative payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained | 19,343 |
| | | 19,343 |
| | 14,151 |
| | | | 14,151 |
| |
Total derivative payables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | Total derivative payables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | $ | 598,219 |
| | | $ | 47,790 |
| | $ | 501,888 |
| | | | $ | 41,769 |
| | Total derivative payables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets | $ | 776,176 |
| | | $ | 65,087 |
| | $ | 512,128 |
| | | | $ | 43,708 |
| |
Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | | | (9,236 | ) | | | | | | (4,449 | ) | | Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c) | | | (10,960 | ) | | | | | | (7,896 | ) | |
Net amounts | Net amounts | | | $ | 38,554 |
| | | | | | $ | 37,320 |
| | Net amounts | | | $ | 54,127 |
| | | | | | $ | 35,812 |
| |
| |
(a) | Exchange-traded derivative balances that relate to futures contracts are settled daily. |
| |
(b) | Represents liquid security collateral as well as cash collateral held at third-party custodians related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has been obtained. For some counterparties, the collateral amounts of financial instruments may exceed the derivative receivables and derivative payables balances. Where this is the case, the total amount reported is limited to the net derivative receivables and net derivative payables balances with that counterparty. |
| |
(c) | Derivative collateral relates only to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. |
| |
(d) | Net derivatives receivable included cash collateral netted of $78.8$90.9 billion and $55.2$65.9 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. Net derivatives payable included cash collateral netted of $62.4$83.7 billion and $43.3$54.4 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. Derivative cash collateral relates to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. |
Liquidity risk and credit-related contingent features
Refer to Note 5 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of liquidity risk and credit-related contingent features related to the Firm’s derivative contracts.
The following table shows the aggregate fair value of net derivative payables related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives that contain contingent collateral or termination features that may be triggered upon a ratings downgrade, and the associated collateral the Firm has posted in the normal course of business, at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019. | | OTC and OTC-cleared derivative payables containing downgrade triggers | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 | | | December 31, 2018 | | March 31, 2020 | | | December 31, 2019 | |
Aggregate fair value of net derivative payables | | $ | 15,466 |
| | $ | 9,396 |
| | $ | 29,521 |
| | $ | 14,819 |
|
Collateral posted | | 14,388 |
| | 8,907 |
| | 28,184 |
| | 13,329 |
|
The following table shows the impact of a single-notch and two-notch downgrade of the long-term issuer ratings of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries, predominantly JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, 2019, related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative contracts with contingent collateral or termination features that may be triggered upon a ratings downgrade. Derivatives contracts generally require additional collateral to be posted or terminations to be triggered when the predefined threshold rating is breached. A downgrade by a single rating agency that does not result in a rating lower than a preexisting corresponding rating provided by another major rating agency will generally not result in additional collateral (except in certain instances in which additional initial margin may be required upon a ratings downgrade), nor in termination payments requirements. The liquidity impact in the table is calculated based upon a downgrade below the lowest current rating of the rating agencies referred to in the derivative contract.
| | Liquidity impact of downgrade triggers on OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives | Liquidity impact of downgrade triggers on OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives | | | | Liquidity impact of downgrade triggers on OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives | | | |
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Single-notch downgrade | Two-notch downgrade | | Single-notch downgrade | Two-notch downgrade | Single-notch downgrade | Two-notch downgrade | | Single-notch downgrade | Two-notch downgrade |
Amount of additional collateral to be posted upon downgrade(a) | $ | 223 |
| $ | 1,420 |
| | $ | 76 |
| $ | 947 |
| $ | 180 |
| $ | 1,286 |
| | $ | 189 |
| $ | 1,467 |
|
Amount required to settle contracts with termination triggers upon downgrade(b) | 184 |
| 1,475 |
| | 172 |
| 764 |
| 191 |
| 2,749 |
| | 104 |
| 1,398 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes the additional collateral to be posted for initial margin. |
| |
(b) | Amounts represent fair values of derivative payables, and do not reflect collateral posted. |
Derivatives executed in contemplation of a sale of the underlying financial asset
In certain instances the Firm enters into transactions in which it transfers financial assets but maintains the economic exposure to the transferred assets by entering into a derivative with the same counterparty in contemplation of the initial transfer. The Firm generally accounts for such transfers as collateralized financing transactions as described in Note 10,11, but in limited circumstances they may qualify to be accounted for as a sale and a derivative under U.S. GAAP. The amount of such transfers accounted for as a sale where the associated derivative was outstanding was not material at both September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.
Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated statements of income
The following tables provide information related to gains and losses recorded on derivatives based on their hedge accounting designation or purpose.
Fair value hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in fair value hedge accounting relationships, as well as pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives and the related hedged items for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Firm includes gains/(losses) on the hedging derivative in the same line item in the Consolidated statements of income as the related hedged item.
| | | Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e) | | OCI impact | Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e) | | OCI impact |
Three months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) | |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) |
Contract type | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate(a)(b) | $ | 1,770 |
| $ | (1,550 | ) | $ | 220 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 228 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 4,087 |
| $ | (3,788 | ) | $ | 299 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 214 |
| | $ | — |
|
Foreign exchange(c) | (167 | ) | 293 |
| 126 |
| | (224 | ) | 126 |
| | (1 | ) | 576 |
| (488 | ) | 88 |
| | (179 | ) | 88 |
| | 115 |
|
Commodity(d) | 278 |
| (232 | ) | 46 |
| | — |
| 49 |
| | — |
| 1,528 |
| (1,482 | ) | 46 |
| | — |
| 49 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 1,881 |
| $ | (1,489 | ) | $ | 392 |
| | $ | (224 | ) | $ | 403 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 6,191 |
| $ | (5,758 | ) | $ | 433 |
| | $ | (179 | ) | $ | 351 |
| | $ | 115 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e)
| | OCI impact |
Three months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) |
Contract type | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate(a)(b) | $ | (870 | ) | $ | 1,032 |
| $ | 162 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 160 |
| | $ | — |
|
Foreign exchange(c) | 277 |
| (165 | ) | 112 |
| | (137 | ) | 112 |
| | 45 |
|
Commodity(d) | 454 |
| (461 | ) | (7 | ) | | — |
| (5 | ) | | — |
|
Total | $ | (139 | ) | $ | 406 |
| $ | 267 |
| | $ | (137 | ) | $ | 267 |
| | $ | 45 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e) | | OCI impact |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) |
Contract type | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate(a)(b) | $ | 4,996 |
| $ | (4,399 | ) | $ | 597 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 596 |
| | $ | — |
|
Foreign exchange(c) | (31 | ) | 401 |
| 370 |
| | (675 | ) | 370 |
| | 114 |
|
Commodity(d) | (164 | ) | 237 |
| 73 |
| | — |
| 67 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 4,801 |
| $ | (3,761 | ) | $ | 1,040 |
| | $ | (675 | ) | $ | 1,033 |
| | $ | 114 |
|
| | | Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e) | | OCI impact | Gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Income statement impact of excluded components(e)
| | OCI impact |
Nine months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) | |
Three months ended March 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Derivatives | Hedged items | Income statement impact | | Amortization approach | Changes in fair value | | Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) |
Contract type | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate(a)(b) | $ | (2,747 | ) | $ | 3,214 |
| $ | 467 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 459 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,464 |
| $ | (1,293 | ) | $ | 171 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 172 |
| | $ | — |
|
Foreign exchange(c) | 797 |
| (452 | ) | 345 |
| | (404 | ) | 345 |
| | (96 | ) | (290 | ) | 409 |
| 119 |
| | (222 | ) | 119 |
| | 3 |
|
Commodity(d) | 649 |
| (626 | ) | 23 |
| | — |
| 29 |
| | — |
| (288 | ) | 294 |
| 6 |
| | — |
| 1 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | (1,301 | ) | $ | 2,136 |
| $ | 835 |
| | $ | (404 | ) | $ | 833 |
| | $ | (96 | ) | $ | 886 |
| $ | (590 | ) | $ | 296 |
| | $ | (222 | ) | $ | 292 |
| | $ | 3 |
|
| |
(a) | Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income. |
| |
(b) | Excludes the amortization expense associated with the inception hedge accounting adjustment applied to the hedged item. This expense is recorded in net interest income and substantially offsets the income statement impact of the excluded components. Also excludes the accrual of interest on interest rate swaps and the related hedged items. |
| |
(c) | Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items due to changes in foreign currency rates and the income statement impact of excluded components were recorded primarily in principal transactions revenue and net interest income. |
| |
(d) | Consists of overall fair value hedges of physical commodities inventories that are generally carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value (net realizable value approximates fair value). Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. |
| |
(e) | The assessment of hedge effectiveness excludes certain components of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and hedged items such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts, time values and cross-currency basis spreads. TheExcluded components may impact earnings either through amortization of the initial amount of the excluded components may be amortized into income over the life of the derivative, or changes inthrough fair value may bechanges recognized in the current period earnings.period. |
| |
(f) | Represents the change in value of amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness under the amortization approach, predominantly cross-currency basis spreads. The amount excluded at inception of the hedge is recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative. |
As of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018, 2019, the following amounts were recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets related to certain cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that are expected to reverse through the income statement in future periods as an adjustment to yield.
| | | | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items:
| | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items:
|
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | | Active hedging relationships | Discontinued hedging relationships(d) | Total | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Active hedging relationships | Discontinued hedging relationships(d)(e) | Total |
Assets | | | | | | |
Investment securities - AFS
| | $ | 123,914 |
| (c) | $ | 3,664 |
| $ | 261 |
| $ | 3,925 |
| | $ | 125,652 |
| (c) | $ | 8,214 |
| $ | 246 |
| $ | 8,460 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 163,494 |
| | $ | 9,957 |
| $ | 125 |
| $ | 10,082 |
| | $ | 172,446 |
| | $ | 17,138 |
| $ | 747 |
| $ | 17,885 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | | 2,362 |
| | — |
| (11 | ) | (11 | ) | | 2,368 |
| | — |
| (6 | ) | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: | | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | | Active hedging relationships | Discontinued hedging relationships(d) | Total | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | | Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) | | Active hedging relationships | Discontinued hedging relationships(d)(e) | Total |
Assets | | | | | | |
Investment securities - AFS
| | $ | 55,313 |
| (c) | $ | (1,105 | ) | $ | 381 |
| $ | (724 | ) | | $ | 125,860 |
| (c) | $ | 2,110 |
| $ | 278 |
| $ | 2,388 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 139,915 |
| | $ | 141 |
| $ | 8 |
| $ | 149 |
| | $ | 157,545 |
| | $ | 6,719 |
| $ | 161 |
| $ | 6,880 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | | 6,987 |
| | — |
| (33 | ) | (33 | ) | | 2,365 |
| | — |
| (8 | ) | (8 | ) |
| |
(a) | Excludes physical commodities with a carrying value of $10.3$6.7 billion and $6.8$6.5 billion at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, to which the Firm applies fair value hedge accounting. As a result of the application of hedge accounting, these inventories are carried at fair value, thus recognizing unrealized gains and losses in current periods. GivenSince the Firm exits these positions at fair value, there is no incremental impact to net income in future periods. |
| |
(b) | Excludes hedged items where only foreign currency risk is the designated hedged risk, as basis adjustments related to foreign currency hedges will not reverse through the income statement in future periods. At September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, the carrying amount excluded for available-for-saleAFS securities is $15.3$16.7 billion and $14.6$14.9 billion, respectively, and for long-term debt is $4.1$1.9 billion and $7.3$2.8 billion, respectively. |
| |
(c) | Carrying amount represents the amortized cost. |
| |
(d) | Represents hedged items no longer designated in qualifying fair value hedging relationships for which an associated basis adjustment exists at the balance sheet date. |
| |
(e) | Positive amounts related to assets represent cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that will reduce net interest income in future periods. Positive (negative) amounts related to liabilities represent cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that will increase (reduce) net interest income in future periods. |
Cash flow hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in cash flow hedge accounting relationships, and the pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives, for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Firm includes the gain/(loss) on the hedging derivative in the same line item in the Consolidated statements of income as the change in cash flows on the related hedged item.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Three months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period |
Contract type | | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 290 |
| $ | 306 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) | (21 | ) | (68 | ) | (47 | ) |
Total | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 222 |
| $ | 259 |
|
| | | |
| Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Three months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period |
Contract type | | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | 10 |
| $ | (30 | ) | $ | (40 | ) |
Foreign exchange(b) | (19 | ) | (92 | ) | (73 | ) |
Total | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (122 | ) | $ | (113 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period |
Contract type | | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 501 |
| $ | 513 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) | (90 | ) | (37 | ) | 53 |
|
Total | $ | (102 | ) | $ | 464 |
| $ | 566 |
|
| | | Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) | Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Nine months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period | |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period |
Contract type | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | 36 |
| $ | (141 | ) | $ | (177 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 3,461 |
| $ | 3,470 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) | 26 |
| (224 | ) | (250 | ) | 17 |
| (210 | ) | (227 | ) |
Total | $ | 62 |
| $ | (365 | ) | $ | (427 | ) | $ | 8 |
| $ | 3,251 |
| $ | 3,243 |
|
| | |
| | Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Three months ended March 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income | Amounts recorded in OCI | Total change in OCI for period |
Contract type | | |
Interest rate(a) | | $ | 2 |
| $ | 56 |
| $ | 54 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) | | (41 | ) | 85 |
| 126 |
|
Total | | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 141 |
| $ | 180 |
|
| |
(a) | Primarily consists of hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income. |
| |
(b) | Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue and compensation expense. |
The Firm did not experience any forecasted transactions that failed to occur for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
Over the next 12 months, the Firm expects that approximately $(130) $57 million (after-tax) of net lossesgains recorded in AOCI at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, related to cash flow hedges will be recognized in income. For cash flow hedges that have been terminated, the maximum length of time over which the derivative results recorded in AOCI will be recognized in earnings is approximately fiveten years, corresponding to the timing of the originally hedged forecasted cash flows.
For open cash flow hedges, the maximum length of time over which forecasted transactions are hedged is approximately seven years. The Firm’s longer-dated forecasted transactions relate to core lending and borrowing activities.
Net investment hedge gains and losses
The following table presents hedging instruments, by contract type, that were used in net investment hedge accounting relationships, and the pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such instruments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
| | | Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) | Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
| 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) | Amounts recorded in OCI | | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) | Amounts recorded in OCI | |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) | Amounts recorded in OCI | | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) | Amounts recorded in OCI |
Foreign exchange derivatives | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 866 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 311 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 1,589 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | (38 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) | Amounts recorded in OCI | | Amounts recorded in income(a)(b)(c) | Amounts recorded in OCI | |
Foreign exchange derivatives | | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 705 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 1,126 |
| |
| |
(a) | Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. The Firm elects to record changes in fair value of these amounts directly in other income. |
| |
(b) | Excludes amounts reclassified from AOCI to income on the sale or liquidation of hedged entities. DuringThere were no sales or liquidations of legal entities that resulted in reclassifications in the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Firm reclassified net pre-tax gains of $5 million to other income related to the liquidation of certain legal entities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Firm reclassified net pre-tax losses of $23 million to other expense related to the liquidation of a legal entity. |
| |
(c) | The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation.periods presented. |
Gains and losses on derivatives used for specified risk management purposes
The following table presents pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on a limited number of derivatives, not designated in hedge accounting relationships, that are used to manage risks associated with certain specified assets and liabilities, including certain risks arising from the mortgage pipeline,commitments, warehouse loans, MSRs, wholesale lending exposures, and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities.
| | | Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income | | Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 | | 2020 | 2019 |
Contract type | | | | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | 769 |
| $ | (42 | ) | | $ | 1,718 |
| $ | (277 | ) | | $ | 1,292 |
| $ | 292 |
|
Credit(b) | (21 | ) | (7 | ) | | (33 | ) | (17 | ) | | 61 |
| (10 | ) |
Foreign exchange(c) | 40 |
| 52 |
| | 15 |
| 167 |
| (d) | 106 |
| 50 |
|
Total | $ | 788 |
| $ | 3 |
| | $ | 1,700 |
| $ | (127 | ) | (d) | $ | 1,459 |
| $ | 332 |
|
| |
(a) | Primarily represents interest rate derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk inherent in the mortgage pipeline,commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, as well as written commitments to originate warehouse loans. Gains and losses were recorded predominantly in mortgage fees and related income. |
| |
(b) | Relates to credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk associated with lending exposures in the Firm’s wholesale businesses. These derivatives do not include credit derivatives used to mitigate counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables, which is included in gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. |
| |
(c) | Primarily relates to derivatives used to mitigate foreign exchange risk of specified foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. |
| |
(d) | The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
Gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives
The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet the needs of customers and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. All derivatives not included in the hedge accounting or specified risk management categories above are included in this category. Gains and losses on these derivatives are primarily recorded in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Note 5 6 for information on principal transactions revenue.
Credit derivatives
Refer to Note 5 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of credit derivatives. The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The Firm does not use notional amounts of credit derivatives as the primary measure of risk management for such derivatives, because the notional amount does not take into account the probability of the occurrence of a credit event, the recovery value of the reference obligation, or related cash instruments and economic hedges, each of which reduces, in the Firm’s view, the risks associated with such derivatives.
Total credit derivatives and credit-related notes
| | | Maximum payout/Notional amount | Maximum payout/Notional amount |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Protection sold | Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b) | Net protection (sold)/purchased(c) | | Other protection purchased(d) | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Protection sold | Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b) | Net protection (sold)/purchased(c) | | Other protection purchased(d) |
Credit derivatives | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit default swaps | $ | (610,946 | ) | | $ | 623,709 |
| $ | 12,763 |
| | $ | 3,630 |
| $ | (705,723 | ) | | $ | 721,125 |
| $ | 15,402 |
| | $ | 4,454 |
|
Other credit derivatives(a) | (55,919 | ) | | 61,847 |
| 5,928 |
| | 8,503 |
| (59,153 | ) | | 61,245 |
| 2,092 |
| | 7,800 |
|
Total credit derivatives | (666,865 | ) | | 685,556 |
| 18,691 |
| | 12,133 |
| (764,876 | ) | | 782,370 |
| 17,494 |
| | 12,254 |
|
Credit-related notes | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 9,297 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 9,002 |
|
Total | $ | (666,865 | ) | | $ | 685,556 |
| $ | 18,691 |
| | $ | 21,430 |
| $ | (764,876 | ) | | $ | 782,370 |
| $ | 17,494 |
| | $ | 21,256 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Maximum payout/Notional amount | Maximum payout/Notional amount |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Protection sold | Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b) | Net protection (sold)/purchased(c) | | Other protection purchased(d) | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Protection sold | Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b) | Net protection (sold)/purchased(c) | | Other protection purchased(d) |
Credit derivatives | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit default swaps | $ | (697,220 | ) | | $ | 707,282 |
| $ | 10,062 |
| | $ | 4,053 |
| $ | (562,338 | ) | | $ | 571,892 |
| $ | 9,554 |
| | $ | 3,936 |
|
Other credit derivatives(a) | (41,244 | ) | | 42,484 |
| 1,240 |
| | 8,488 |
| (44,929 | ) | | 52,007 |
| 7,078 |
| | 7,364 |
|
Total credit derivatives | (738,464 | ) | | 749,766 |
| 11,302 |
| | 12,541 |
| (607,267 | ) | | 623,899 |
| 16,632 |
| | 11,300 |
|
Credit-related notes | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 8,425 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 9,606 |
|
Total | $ | (738,464 | ) | | $ | 749,766 |
| $ | 11,302 |
| | $ | 20,966 |
| $ | (607,267 | ) | | $ | 623,899 |
| $ | 16,632 |
| | $ | 20,906 |
|
| |
(a) | Other credit derivatives predominantly consist of credit swap options and total return swaps. |
| |
(b) | Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold. |
| |
(c) | Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value. |
| |
(d) | Represents protection purchased by the Firm on referenced instruments (single-name, portfolio or index) where the Firm has not sold any protection on the identical reference instrument. |
The following tables summarize the notional amounts by the ratings, maturity profile, and total fair value, of credit derivatives and credit-related notes as of September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, 2019, where JPMorgan Chase is the seller of protection. The maturity profile is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the credit derivative contracts. The ratings profile is based on the rating of the reference entity on which the credit derivative contract is based. The ratings and maturity profile of credit derivatives and credit-related notes where JPMorgan Chase is the purchaser of protection are comparable to the profile reflected below.
| | Protection sold — credit derivatives and credit-related notes ratings(a)/maturity profile | Protection sold — credit derivatives and credit-related notes ratings(a)/maturity profile | | | | Protection sold — credit derivatives and credit-related notes ratings(a)/maturity profile | | | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | <1 year | | 1–5 years | | >5 years | | Total notional amount | | Fair value of receivables(b) | | Fair value of payables(b) | | Net fair value | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | <1 year | | 1–5 years | | >5 years | | Total notional amount | | Fair value of receivables(b) | | Fair value of payables(b) | | Net fair value |
Risk rating of reference entity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | (106,698 | ) | | $ | (316,946 | ) | | $ | (75,615 | ) | | $ | (499,259 | ) | | $ | 5,621 |
| | $ | (1,260 | ) | | $ | 4,361 |
| $ | (119,850 | ) | | $ | (377,563 | ) | | $ | (84,443 | ) | | $ | (581,856 | ) | | $ | 2,735 |
| | $ | (4,961 | ) | | $ | (2,226 | ) |
Noninvestment-grade | (39,180 | ) | | (103,249 | ) | | (25,177 | ) | | (167,606 | ) | | 4,699 |
| | (3,415 | ) | | 1,284 |
| (40,423 | ) | | (115,600 | ) | | (26,997 | ) | | (183,020 | ) | | 1,837 |
| | (9,104 | ) | | (7,267 | ) |
Total | $ | (145,878 | ) | | $ | (420,195 | ) | | $ | (100,792 | ) | | $ | (666,865 | ) | | $ | 10,320 |
| | $ | (4,675 | ) | | $ | 5,645 |
| $ | (160,273 | ) | | $ | (493,163 | ) | | $ | (111,440 | ) | | $ | (764,876 | ) | | $ | 4,572 |
| | $ | (14,065 | ) | | $ | (9,493 | ) |
| | December 31, 2018 (in millions) | <1 year | | 1–5 years | | >5 years | | Total notional amount | | Fair value of receivables(b) | | Fair value of payables(b) | | Net fair value | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | <1 year | | 1–5 years | | >5 years | | Total notional amount | | Fair value of receivables(b) | | Fair value of payables(b) | | Net fair value |
Risk rating of reference entity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | (115,443 | ) | | $ | (402,325 | ) | | $ | (43,611 | ) | | $ | (561,379 | ) | | $ | 5,720 |
| | $ | (2,791 | ) | | $ | 2,929 |
| $ | (114,460 | ) | | $ | (311,407 | ) | | $ | (42,129 | ) | | $ | (467,996 | ) | | $ | 6,153 |
| | $ | (911 | ) | | $ | 5,242 |
|
Noninvestment-grade | (45,897 | ) | | (119,348 | ) | | (11,840 | ) | | (177,085 | ) | | 4,719 |
| | (5,660 | ) | | (941 | ) | (41,661 | ) | | (87,769 | ) | | (9,841 | ) | | (139,271 | ) | | 4,281 |
| | (2,882 | ) | | 1,399 |
|
Total | $ | (161,340 | ) | | $ | (521,673 | ) | | $ | (55,451 | ) | | $ | (738,464 | ) | | $ | 10,439 |
| | $ | (8,451 | ) | | $ | 1,988 |
| $ | (156,121 | ) | | $ | (399,176 | ) | | $ | (51,970 | ) | | $ | (607,267 | ) | | $ | 10,434 |
| | $ | (3,793 | ) | | $ | 6,641 |
|
| |
(a) | The ratings scale is primarily based on external credit ratings defined by S&P and Moody’s. |
| |
(b) | Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received by the Firm. |
Note 56 – Noninterest revenue and noninterest expense
Noninterest revenue
Refer to Note 6 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the components of and accounting policies for the Firm’s noninterest revenue.
Investment banking fees
The following table presents the components of investment banking fees.
| |
| Three months ended September 30, |
| Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | $ | 517 |
|
| $ | 417 |
|
| $ | 1,293 |
|
| $ | 1,342 |
| $ | 327 |
|
| $ | 261 |
|
Debt | 955 |
|
| 836 |
|
| 2,720 |
|
| 2,596 |
| 1,044 |
|
| 945 |
|
Total underwriting | 1,472 |
|
| 1,253 |
|
| 4,013 |
|
| 3,938 |
| 1,371 |
|
| 1,206 |
|
Advisory | 495 |
|
| 579 |
|
| 1,645 |
|
| 1,798 |
| 495 |
|
| 634 |
|
Total investment banking fees | $ | 1,967 |
|
| $ | 1,832 |
|
| $ | 5,658 |
|
| $ | 5,736 |
| $ | 1,866 |
|
| $ | 1,840 |
|
Principal transactions
The following table presents all realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in principal transactions revenue. This table excludes interest income and interest expense on trading assets and liabilities, which are an integral part of the overall performance of the Firm’s client-driven market-making activities in CIB and cash deployment activities in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Note 67 for further information on interest income and interest expense.
Trading revenue is presented primarily by instrument type. The Firm’s client-driven market-making businesses generally utilize a variety of instrument types in connection with their market-making and related risk-management activities; accordingly, the trading revenue presented in the table below is not representative of the total revenue of any individual line of business.LOB.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, | |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
| |
Trading revenue by instrument type | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate(a) | $ | 835 |
| | $ | 338 |
| | $ | 1,901 |
| | $ | 1,784 |
| $ | 452 |
| | $ | 799 |
| (d) |
Credit(b) | 328 |
| | 202 |
| | 1,375 |
| | 1,230 |
| (702 | ) | (c) | 619 |
| (d) |
Foreign exchange | 892 |
| | 937 |
| | 2,509 |
| | 2,706 |
| 1,467 |
| | 888 |
| |
Equity | 1,003 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 4,530 |
| | 4,376 |
| 1,348 |
| | 1,361 |
| (d) |
Commodity | 372 |
| | 277 |
| | 982 |
| | 800 |
| 437 |
| | 383 |
| |
Total trading revenue | 3,430 |
| | 3,117 |
| | 11,297 |
| | 10,896 |
| 3,002 |
| | 4,050 |
| |
Private equity gains/(losses)(a) | 19 |
| | (153 | ) | | (58 | ) | | (198 | ) | (65 | ) | | 26 |
| |
Principal transactions | $ | 3,449 |
| | $ | 2,964 |
| | $ | 11,239 |
| | $ | 10,698 |
| $ | 2,937 |
| | $ | 4,076 |
| |
| |
(a) | The third quarterIncludes the impact of 2018 includedchanges in funding valuation adjustments on derivatives. |
| |
(b) | Includes the impact of changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, net of the associated hedging activities. |
| |
(c) | Includes markdowns of approximately $220 million on certain private equity investmentsheld-for-sale positions, including unfunded commitments, in Corporate,the bridge financing portfolio. |
| |
(d) | Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with $170 million recorded within principal transactions revenue and $50 million in other income.the current presentation. |
Lending- and deposit-related fees
The following table presents the components of lending- and deposit-related fees.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Lending-related fees | $ | 286 |
| | $ | 284 |
| | $ | 861 |
| | $ | 838 |
| $ | 291 |
| | $ | 290 |
|
Deposit-related fees(a) | 1,340 |
| | 1,258 |
| | 3,782 |
| | 3,676 |
| 1,415 |
| | 1,269 |
|
Total lending- and deposit-related fees | $ | 1,626 |
| | $ | 1,542 |
| | $ | 4,643 |
| | $ | 4,514 |
| $ | 1,706 |
| | $ | 1,559 |
|
| |
(a) | In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and commissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
Asset management, administration and commissions
The following table presents the components of Firmwide asset management, administration and commissions. | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Asset management fees | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment management fees(a) | $ | 2,738 |
| | $ | 2,716 |
| | $ | 8,013 |
| | $ | 8,081 |
| $ | 2,785 |
| | $ | 2,577 |
|
All other asset management fees(b) | 82 |
| | 79 |
| | 229 |
| | 211 |
| 93 |
| | 69 |
|
Total asset management fees | 2,820 |
| | 2,795 |
| | 8,242 |
| | 8,292 |
| 2,878 |
| | 2,646 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total administration fees(c) | 567 |
| | 533 |
| | 1,646 |
| | 1,651 |
| 554 |
| | 535 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and other fees | | | | | | | | | | |
Brokerage commissions(d) | 634 |
| | 604 |
| | 1,861 |
| | 1,887 |
| 864 |
| | 586 |
|
All other commissions and fees(e) | 330 |
| | 378 |
| | 1,069 |
| | 1,093 |
| 244 |
| | 270 |
|
Total commissions and fees | 964 |
| | 982 |
| | 2,930 |
| | 2,980 |
| 1,108 |
| | 856 |
|
Total asset management, administration and commissions | $ | 4,351 |
| | $ | 4,310 |
| | $ | 12,818 |
| | $ | 12,923 |
| $ | 4,540 |
| | $ | 4,037 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents fees earned from managing assets on behalf of the Firm’s clients, including investors in Firm-sponsored funds and owners of separately managed investment accounts. |
| |
(b) | Represents fees for services that are ancillary to investment management services, such as commissions earned on the sales or distribution of mutual funds to clients. |
| |
(c) | Predominantly includes fees for custody, securities lending, funds services and securities clearance. |
| |
(d) | Represents commissions earned when the Firm acts as a broker, by facilitating its clients’ purchases and sales of securities and other financial instruments. |
| |
(e) | In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm reclassified certain fees from asset management, administration and commissions to lending- and deposit-related fees. Prior-period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
Card income
The following table presents the components of card income:
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Interchange and merchant processing income | $ | 5,127 |
| | $ | 4,781 |
| | $ | 15,032 |
| | $ | 13,863 |
| $ | 4,782 |
| | $ | 4,721 |
|
Rewards costs and partner payments(a) | (3,669 | ) | | (3,276 | ) | | (10,515 | ) | | (9,687 | ) | (3,523 | ) | | (3,236 | ) |
Other card income(b)(a) | (175 | ) | | (177 | ) | | (594 | ) | | (553 | ) | (205 | ) | | (211 | ) |
Total card income | $ | 1,283 |
| | $ | 1,328 |
| | $ | 3,923 |
| | $ | 3,623 |
| $ | 1,054 |
| | $ | 1,274 |
|
| |
(a) | The three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, included an adjustment to the credit card rewards liability of approximately $330 million. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly represents annual fees and newthe amortization of account origination costs which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period.annual fees. |
Refer to Note 1415 Goodwill and MSRs for information on mortgage fees and related income.
Refer to Note 16 Leases17 for information on operating lease income included within other income.
Noninterest expense
Other expense
Other expense on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income included the following:
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Legal expense/(benefit) | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 90 |
| $ | 197 |
| | $ | (81 | ) |
FDIC-related expense | 114 |
| | 349 |
| | 378 |
| | 1,100 |
| 99 |
| | 143 |
|
Note 67 – Interest income and Interest expense
Refer to Note 7 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a description of JPMorgan Chase’s accounting policies regarding interest income and interest expense.
The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense.
| |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
Interest income | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans(a) | $ | 12,586 |
|
| $ | 12,207 |
| | $ | 38,192 |
| | $ | 34,915 |
| $ | 11,932 |
|
| $ | 12,880 |
|
Taxable securities | 2,132 |
|
| 1,402 |
| | 5,712 |
| | 4,098 |
| 2,233 |
|
| 1,705 |
|
Non-taxable securities(b) | 318 |
|
| 394 |
| | 1,021 |
| | 1,199 |
| 300 |
|
| 363 |
|
Total investment securities(a) | 2,450 |
|
| 1,796 |
| | 6,733 |
| | 5,297 |
| 2,533 |
|
| 2,068 |
|
Trading assets - debt instruments | 2,659 |
|
| 2,155 |
| | 8,343 |
| | 6,369 |
| 2,461 |
|
| 2,769 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 1,542 |
|
| 952 |
| | 4,865 |
| | 2,490 |
| 1,095 |
|
| 1,647 |
|
Securities borrowed(c) | 434 |
|
| 248 |
| | 1,298 |
| | 549 |
| 152 |
|
| 397 |
|
Deposits with banks | 898 |
|
| 1,585 |
| | 3,200 |
| | 4,449 |
| 569 |
|
| 1,170 |
|
All other interest-earning assets(d)(c) | 552 |
|
| 496 |
| | 1,482 |
| | 1,430 |
| 419 |
|
| 458 |
|
Total interest income(c) | 21,121 |
|
| 19,439 |
| | 64,113 |
| | 55,499 |
| 19,161 |
|
| 21,389 |
|
Interest expense | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits | 2,409 |
| | 1,621 |
| | 7,010 |
| | 4,021 |
| 1,575 |
| | 2,188 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 1,241 |
| | 827 |
| | 3,577 |
| | 2,164 |
| 787 |
| | 1,110 |
|
Short-term borrowings(e)(d) | 261 |
| | 288 |
| | 1,051 |
| | 757 |
| 151 |
| | 427 |
|
Trading liabilities – debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(f)(e) | 660 |
| | 617 |
| | 2,141 |
| | 1,674 |
| 372 |
| | 719 |
|
Long-term debt | 2,188 |
| | 2,056 |
| | 6,796 |
| | 5,812 |
| 1,747 |
| | 2,342 |
|
Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs | 134 |
| | 122 |
| | 459 |
| | 366 |
| 90 |
| | 150 |
|
Total interest expense(c) | 6,893 |
| | 5,531 |
| | 21,034 |
| | 14,794 |
| 4,722 |
| | 6,936 |
|
Net interest income | 14,228 |
| | 13,908 |
| | 43,079 |
| | 40,705 |
| 14,439 |
| | 14,453 |
|
Provision for credit losses | 1,514 |
| | 948 |
| | 4,158 |
| | 3,323 |
| 8,285 |
| | 1,495 |
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | $ | 12,714 |
| | $ | 12,960 |
| | $ | 38,921 |
| | $ | 37,382 |
| $ | 6,154 |
| | $ | 12,958 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes the amortization/accretion of unearned income (e.g., purchase premiums/discounts, net deferred fees/costs, etc.). |
| |
(b) | Represents securities which are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
| |
(c) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm implemented certain presentation changes that impactedIncludes interest income and interest expense, but had no effectearned on net interest income. These changes were made to align the accounting treatment between the balance sheet and the related interest income or expense, primarily by offsetting interest income and expense for certain prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and payables that are currently presented as a single margin account on the balance sheet. These changes were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
| |
(d) | Includes prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(e)(d) | Includes commercial paper. |
| |
(f)(e) | Other interest-bearing liabilities includeincludes interest expense on prime brokerage-related customer payables. |
Note 78 – Pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans
Refer to Note 8 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of JPMorgan Chase’s pension and OPEB plans.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit costs reported in the Consolidated statements of income for the Firm’s U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension, defined contribution and OPEB plans. | | (in millions) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 | 2020 | 2019 | | 2020 | 2019 |
Pension plans | | OPEB plans | | Pension plans | | OPEB plans | Pension plans | | OPEB plans |
Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefits earned during the period | $ | 88 |
| $ | 88 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 266 |
| $ | 267 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 8 |
| $ | 89 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligations | 148 |
| 139 |
| | 6 |
| 6 |
| | 447 |
| 417 |
| | 18 |
| 18 |
| 119 |
| 150 |
| | 5 |
| 6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (227 | ) | (246 | ) | | (28 | ) | (25 | ) | | (686 | ) | (741 | ) | | (84 | ) | (77 | ) | (191 | ) | (230 | ) | | (27 | ) | (28 | ) |
Amortization: | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net (gain)/loss | 42 |
| 26 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 125 |
| 78 |
| | — |
| — |
| 4 |
| 42 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Prior service (credit)/cost | — |
| (7 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 2 |
| (19 | ) | | — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Net periodic defined benefit cost | 51 |
| — |
| | (22 | ) | (19 | ) | | 154 |
| 2 |
| | (66 | ) | (59 | ) | (59 | ) | 52 |
| | (22 | ) | (22 | ) |
Other defined benefit pension plans(a) | 7 |
| 6 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | 20 |
| 21 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| 9 |
| 6 |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total defined benefit plans | 58 |
| 6 |
| | (22 | ) | (19 | ) | | 174 |
| 23 |
| | (66 | ) | (59 | ) | (50 | ) | 58 |
| | (22 | ) | (22 | ) |
Total defined contribution plans | 255 |
| 229 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | 718 |
| 661 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| 299 |
| 220 |
| | NA |
| NA |
|
Total pension and OPEB cost included in noninterest expense | $ | 313 |
| $ | 235 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | | $ | 892 |
| $ | 684 |
| | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 249 |
| $ | 278 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (22 | ) |
| |
(a) | Includes various defined benefit pension plans which are individually immaterial. |
The following table presents the fair values of plan assets for the U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB plans and for the material non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans.
| | (in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Fair value of plan assets | | | | | | |
Defined benefit pension plans | $ | 20.1 |
| | $ | 18.1 |
| $ | 19.3 |
| | $ | 20.4 |
|
OPEB plans | 2.9 |
| | 2.6 |
| 2.7 |
| | 3.0 |
|
There are 0 expected contributions to the U.S. defined benefit pension plan for 2019.2020.
Note 89 – Employee share-based incentives
Refer to Note 9 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the accounting policies and other information relating to employee share-based incentives.
The Firm recognized the following noncash compensation expense related to its various employee share-based incentive plans in its Consolidated statements of income.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Cost of prior grants of RSUs, performance share units (“PSUs”) and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods | $ | 265 |
| | $ | 282 |
| | $ | 882 |
| | $ | 956 |
| |
Cost of prior grants of RSUs, performance share units (“PSUs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and employee stock options that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods | | $ | 334 |
| | $ | 339 |
|
Accrual of estimated costs of share-based awards to be granted in future periods including those to full-career eligible employees | 294 |
| | 240 |
| | 900 |
| | 852 |
| 310 |
| | 314 |
|
Total noncash compensation expense related to employee share-based incentive plans | $ | 559 |
| | $ | 522 |
| | $ | 1,782 |
| | $ | 1,808 |
| $ | 644 |
| | $ | 653 |
|
In the first quarter of 2019, 2020, in connection with its annual incentive grant for the 20182019 performance year, the Firm granted 2115 million RSUs and 630496 thousand PSUs with weighted-average grant date fair values of $98.98$135.64 per RSU and $98.96$135.30 per PSU.
Note 910 – Investment securities
Investment securities consist of debt securities that are classified as AFS or HTM. Debt securities classified as trading assets are discussed in Note 2. Predominantly all of the Firm’s AFS and HTM securities are held by Treasury and CIO in connection with its asset-liability management activities. At September 30, 2019, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of AA+ (based upon external ratings where available,
and where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings which correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s). Refer to Note 10 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the investment securities portfolio.
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance, which also amended the AFS
securities impairment guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
During the first quarter of 2020, the Firm transferred $26.1 billion of U.S. GSE and government agency MBS from AFS to HTM for capital management purposes. These securities were transferred at fair value in a non-cash transaction. AOCI included pretax unrealized gains of $1.0 billion on the securities at the date of transfer.
The amortized costs and estimated fair values of the investment securities portfolio were as follows for the dates indicated.
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Amortized cost(e) | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | | Amortized cost(e) | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | $ | 103,086 |
| $ | 2,556 |
| $ | 61 |
| | $ | 105,581 |
| | $ | 69,026 |
| $ | 594 |
| $ | 974 |
| | $ | 68,646 |
| $ | 131,141 |
| $ | 4,673 |
| $ | 194 |
| | $ | 135,620 |
| | $ | 107,811 |
| $ | 2,395 |
| $ | 89 |
| | $ | 110,117 |
|
Residential: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. | 10,083 |
| 273 |
| 6 |
| | 10,350 |
| | 5,877 |
| 79 |
| 31 |
| | 5,925 |
| 12,241 |
| 162 |
| 199 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 10,223 |
| 233 |
| 6 |
| | 10,450 |
|
Non-U.S. | 2,490 |
| 64 |
| 2 |
| | 2,552 |
| | 2,529 |
| 72 |
| 6 |
| | 2,595 |
| 3,364 |
| 29 |
| 154 |
| | 3,239 |
| | 2,477 |
| 64 |
| 1 |
| | 2,540 |
|
Commercial | 5,228 |
| 100 |
| 4 |
| | 5,324 |
| | 6,758 |
| 43 |
| 147 |
| | 6,654 |
| 6,428 |
| 39 |
| 154 |
| | 6,313 |
| | 5,137 |
| 64 |
| 13 |
| | 5,188 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 120,887 |
| 2,993 |
| 73 |
| | 123,807 |
| | 84,190 |
| 788 |
| 1,158 |
| | 83,820 |
| 153,174 |
| 4,903 |
| 701 |
| | 157,376 |
| | 125,648 |
| 2,756 |
| 109 |
| | 128,295 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies | 141,646 |
| 376 |
| 493 |
| | 141,529 |
| | 55,771 |
| 366 |
| 78 |
| | 56,059 |
| 148,476 |
| 2,514 |
| 755 |
| | 150,235 |
| | 139,162 |
| 449 |
| 175 |
| | 139,436 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 28,871 |
| 2,193 |
| — |
| | 31,064 |
| | 36,221 |
| 1,582 |
| 80 |
| | 37,723 |
| 28,886 |
| 1,712 |
| 53 |
| | 30,545 |
| | 27,693 |
| 2,118 |
| 1 |
| | 29,810 |
|
Certificates of deposit | 74 |
| — |
| — |
| | 74 |
| | 75 |
| — |
| — |
| | 75 |
| 76 |
| — |
| — |
| | 76 |
| | 77 |
| — |
| — |
| | 77 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 21,644 |
| 524 |
| 10 |
| | 22,158 |
| | 23,771 |
| 351 |
| 20 |
| | 24,102 |
| 22,369 |
| 400 |
| 8 |
| | 22,761 |
| | 21,427 |
| 377 |
| 17 |
| | 21,787 |
|
Corporate debt securities | 1,596 |
| 39 |
| 1 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 1,904 |
| 23 |
| 9 |
| | 1,918 |
| 838 |
| — |
| 36 |
| | 802 |
| | 823 |
| 22 |
| — |
| | 845 |
|
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | 27,942 |
| 18 |
| 52 |
| | 27,908 |
| | 19,612 |
| 1 |
| 176 |
| | 19,437 |
| 33,022 |
| — |
| 2,047 |
| | 30,975 |
| | 25,038 |
| 9 |
| 56 |
| | 24,991 |
|
Other | 5,199 |
| 57 |
| 9 |
| | 5,247 |
| | 7,225 |
| 57 |
| 22 |
| | 7,260 |
| 7,263 |
| 24 |
| 113 |
| | 7,174 |
| | 5,438 |
| 40 |
| 20 |
| | 5,458 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities(b) | 347,859 |
| 6,200 |
| 638 |
| | 353,421 |
| | 228,769 |
| 3,168 |
| 1,543 |
| | 230,394 |
| 394,104 |
| 9,553 |
| 3,713 |
| | 399,944 |
| | 345,306 |
| 5,771 |
| 378 |
| | 350,699 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities(c) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) | 35,976 |
| 1,250 |
| 20 |
| | 37,206 |
| | 26,610 |
| 134 |
| 200 |
| | 26,544 |
| 61,513 |
| 2,253 |
| 88 |
| | 63,678 |
| | 36,523 |
| 1,165 |
| 62 |
| | 37,626 |
|
Commercial | | 107 |
| 12 |
| — |
| | 120 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 35,976 |
| 1,250 |
| 20 |
| | 37,206 |
| | 26,610 |
| 134 |
| 200 |
| | 26,544 |
| 61,620 |
| 2,265 |
| 88 |
| | 63,798 |
| | 36,523 |
| 1,165 |
| 62 |
| | 37,626 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
| 51 |
| — |
| — |
| | 51 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| 51 |
| 2 |
| — |
| | 53 |
| | 51 |
| — |
| 1 |
| | 50 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 4,803 |
| 317 |
| — |
| | 5,120 |
| | 4,824 |
| 105 |
| 15 |
| | 4,914 |
| 4,842 |
| 307 |
| — |
| | 5,167 |
| | 4,797 |
| 299 |
| — |
| | 5,096 |
|
Total held-to-maturity securities | 40,830 |
| 1,567 |
| 20 |
| | 42,377 |
| | 31,434 |
| 239 |
| 215 |
| | 31,458 |
| |
Total investment securities | $ | 388,689 |
| $ | 7,767 |
| $ | 658 |
| | $ | 395,798 |
| | $ | 260,203 |
| $ | 3,407 |
| $ | 1,758 |
| | $ | 261,852 |
| |
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | | 4,687 |
| — |
| 181 |
| | 4,506 |
| | 6,169 |
| — |
| — |
| | 6,169 |
|
Total held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for credit losses(d) | | 71,200 |
| 2,574 |
| 269 |
| | 73,524 |
| | 47,540 |
| 1,464 |
| 63 |
| | 48,941 |
|
Total investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses(d) | | $ | 465,304 |
| $ | 12,127 |
| $ | 3,982 |
| | $ | 473,468 |
| | $ | 392,846 |
| $ | 7,235 |
| $ | 441 |
| | $ | 399,640 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes AFS U.S. GSE obligations with fair values of $78.8$86.1 billion and $50.7$78.5 billion, and HTM U.S. GSE obligations with amortized cost of $30.8$51.9 billion and $20.9$31.6 billion, at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. As of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each exceeded 10% of JPMorgan Chase’s total stockholders’ equity; the amortized cost and fair value of such securities was $69.8were $83.9 billion and $72.0$87.3 billion, and $37.8$51.0 billion and $38.8$52.7 billion, respectively. |
| |
(b) | There was 0 allowance for credit losses on AFS securities at March 31, 2020. |
| |
(c) | The Firm purchased $205 million of HTM securities for the three months ended March 31, 2020; there were 0 purchases of HTM securities for the three months ended March 31, 2019. |
| |
(d) | HTM securities measured at amortized cost are reported net of allowance for credit losses of $19 million at March 31, 2020. |
| |
(e) | Excludes $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion of accrued interest receivables at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The Firm did 0t reverse through interest income any accrued interest receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. |
At March 31, 2020, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of securities and differentiate risk within the portfolio. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the
Investment
economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., PDs and LGDs) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions.Risk ratings are assigned at acquisition, are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary over the life of the investment for updated information affecting the issuer’s ability to fulfill its obligations.
AFS securities impairment
The following tables present the fair value and gross unrealized losses for investment securities by aging category for AFS securities at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019. The tables exclude U.S. Treasury and government agency securities and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS with unrealized losses of $949 million and $264 million, at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively; changes in the value of these securities are generally driven by changes in interest rates rather than changes in their credit profile given the explicit or implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. government.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment securities with gross unrealized losses |
| Less than 12 months | | 12 months or more | | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Total fair value | Total gross unrealized losses |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 8,505 |
| $ | 37 |
| | $ | 2,952 |
| $ | 24 |
| $ | 11,457 |
| $ | 61 |
|
Residential: | | | | | | | |
U.S. | — |
| — |
| | 558 |
| 6 |
| 558 |
| 6 |
|
Non-U.S. | 47 |
| — |
| | 472 |
| 2 |
| 519 |
| 2 |
|
Commercial | 752 |
| 4 |
| | 165 |
| — |
| 917 |
| 4 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 9,304 |
| 41 |
| | 4,147 |
| 32 |
| 13,451 |
| 73 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies | 84,152 |
| 489 |
| | 540 |
| 4 |
| 84,692 |
| 493 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 41 |
| — |
| | 23 |
| — |
| 64 |
| — |
|
Certificates of deposit | 74 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 74 |
| — |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 3,189 |
| 6 |
| | 1,357 |
| 4 |
| 4,546 |
| 10 |
|
Corporate debt securities | 83 |
| — |
| | 36 |
| 1 |
| 119 |
| 1 |
|
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | 7,086 |
| 8 |
| | 6,684 |
| 44 |
| 13,770 |
| 52 |
|
Other | 506 |
| 3 |
| | 1,598 |
| 6 |
| 2,104 |
| 9 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | 104,435 |
| 547 |
| | 14,385 |
| 91 |
| 118,820 |
| 638 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | 2,240 |
| 20 |
| | 86 |
| — |
| 2,326 |
| 20 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 2,240 |
| 20 |
| | 86 |
| — |
| 2,326 |
| 20 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
| 51 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 51 |
| — |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Total held-to-maturity securities | 2,291 |
| 20 |
| | 86 |
| — |
| 2,377 |
| 20 |
|
Total investment securities with gross unrealized losses | $ | 106,726 |
| $ | 567 |
| | $ | 14,471 |
| $ | 91 |
| $ | 121,197 |
| $ | 658 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses |
| Less than 12 months | | 12 months or more | | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Total fair value | Total gross unrealized losses |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
Residential: | | | | | | | |
U.S. | 5,847 |
| 188 |
| | 320 |
| 11 |
| 6,167 |
| 199 |
|
Non-U.S. | 2,354 |
| 150 |
| | 259 |
| 4 |
| 2,613 |
| 154 |
|
Commercial | 4,136 |
| 136 |
| | 191 |
| 18 |
| 4,327 |
| 154 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 12,337 |
| 474 |
| | 770 |
| 33 |
| 13,107 |
| 507 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 1,059 |
| 53 |
| | — |
| — |
| 1,059 |
| 53 |
|
Certificates of deposit | 76 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 76 |
| — |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 2,303 |
| 5 |
| | 347 |
| 3 |
| 2,650 |
| 8 |
|
Corporate debt securities | 760 |
| 36 |
| | — |
| — |
| 760 |
| 36 |
|
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | 25,589 |
| 1,670 |
| | 5,357 |
| 377 |
| 30,946 |
| 2,047 |
|
Other | 4,897 |
| 71 |
| | 840 |
| 42 |
| 5,737 |
| 113 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses | 47,021 |
| 2,309 |
| | 7,314 |
| 455 |
| 54,335 |
| 2,764 |
|
| | | Investment securities with gross unrealized losses | Available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses |
| Less than 12 months | | 12 months or more | | Less than 12 months | | 12 months or more | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Total fair value | Total gross unrealized losses | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Total fair value | Total gross unrealized losses |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 17,656 |
| $ | 318 |
| | $ | 22,728 |
| $ | 656 |
| $ | 40,384 |
| $ | 974 |
| |
Residential: | | | | | | |
U.S. | 623 |
| 4 |
| | 1,445 |
| 27 |
| 2,068 |
| 31 |
| 1,072 |
| 3 |
| | 423 |
| 3 |
| 1,495 |
| 6 |
|
Non-U.S. | 907 |
| 5 |
| | 165 |
| 1 |
| 1,072 |
| 6 |
| 13 |
| — |
| | 420 |
| 1 |
| 433 |
| 1 |
|
Commercial | 974 |
| 6 |
| | 3,172 |
| 141 |
| 4,146 |
| 147 |
| 1,287 |
| 12 |
| | 199 |
| 1 |
| 1,486 |
| 13 |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities | 20,160 |
| 333 |
| | 27,510 |
| 825 |
| 47,670 |
| 1,158 |
| 2,372 |
| 15 |
| | 1,042 |
| 5 |
| 3,414 |
| 20 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies | 4,792 |
| 7 |
| | 2,391 |
| 71 |
| 7,183 |
| 78 |
| |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 1,808 |
| 15 |
| | 2,477 |
| 65 |
| 4,285 |
| 80 |
| 186 |
| 1 |
| | — |
| — |
| 186 |
| 1 |
|
Certificates of deposit | 75 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 75 |
| — |
| 77 |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| 77 |
| — |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities | 3,123 |
| 5 |
| | 1,937 |
| 15 |
| 5,060 |
| 20 |
| 3,970 |
| 13 |
| | 1,406 |
| 4 |
| 5,376 |
| 17 |
|
Corporate debt securities | 478 |
| 8 |
| | 37 |
| 1 |
| 515 |
| 9 |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | |
Collateralized loan obligations | 18,681 |
| 176 |
| | — |
| — |
| 18,681 |
| 176 |
| 10,364 |
| 11 |
| | 7,756 |
| 45 |
| 18,120 |
| 56 |
|
Other | 1,208 |
| 6 |
| | 2,354 |
| 16 |
| 3,562 |
| 22 |
| 1,639 |
| 9 |
| | 753 |
| 11 |
| 2,392 |
| 20 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | 50,325 |
| 550 |
| | 36,706 |
| 993 |
| 87,031 |
| 1,543 |
| |
Held-to-maturity securities | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | 4,385 |
| 23 |
| | 7,082 |
| 177 |
| 11,467 |
| 200 |
| |
Total mortgage-backed securities | 4,385 |
| 23 |
| | 7,082 |
| 177 |
| 11,467 |
| 200 |
| |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 12 |
| — |
| | 1,114 |
| 15 |
| 1,126 |
| 15 |
| |
Total held-to-maturity securities | 4,397 |
| 23 |
| | 8,196 |
| 192 |
| 12,593 |
| 215 |
| |
Total investment securities with gross unrealized losses | $ | 54,722 |
| $ | 573 |
| | $ | 44,902 |
| $ | 1,185 |
| $ | 99,624 |
| $ | 1,758 |
| |
Total available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses | | 18,608 |
| 49 |
| | 10,957 |
| 65 |
| 29,565 |
| 114 |
|
Other-than-temporaryAs a result of the adoption of the amended AFS securities impairment guidance, an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities is required for impaired securities if a credit loss exists.
AFS securities are considered impaired if the fair value is less than the amortized cost (excluding accrued interest receivable).
The Firm recognizes unrealizedimpairment losses on investment securities that it intendsin earnings if the Firm has the intent to sell as OTTI. The Firm does not intend to sell any of the remaining investment securities with an unrealized loss in AOCI as of September 30, 2019, anddebt security, or if it is more likely than not likely that the Firm will be required to sell these securitiesthe debt security before recovery of theirits amortized cost. In these circumstances the impairment loss recognized in earnings is equal to the full difference between the amortized cost basis. Further,(excluding accrued interest receivable and net of allowance if applicable) and the fair value of the securities.
For impaired debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold, the securities are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. If it is determined that a credit loss exists, that loss is recognized as an allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income, limited by the amount of impairment. Any impairment not due to credit losses is recorded in OCI.
Factors considered in evaluating credit losses include adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of a security; and payment structure of the security.
When assessing securities issued in a securitization for credit losses, the Firm estimates cash flows considering relevant market and economic data, underlying loan-level data, and structural features of the securitization, such as subordination, excess spread, overcollateralization or other forms of credit enhancement, and compares the losses projected for the underlying collateral (“pool losses”) against the level of credit enhancement in the securitization structure to determine whether these features are sufficient to absorb the pool losses, or whether a credit loss exists.
For beneficial interests in securitizations that are rated below “AA” at their acquisition, or that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Firm would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment, the Firm evaluates impairment for credit losses when there is an adverse change in expected cash flows.
Unrealized losses on AFS securities increased during the first quarter of 2020 due to credit spread widening amid volatile financial markets in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase was largely related to collateralized loan obligations which had gross unrealized losses of $2.0 billion as of March 31, 2020. Over 99% of these collateralized loan obligations are rated “AAA”, and the average credit enhancement was 37%. Credit enhancement in collateralized loan obligations is primarily in the form of overcollateralization, which is the excess of the par amount of collateral over the par amount of securities. Management assessed the projected collateral performance and the structural protections of these securities including underlying loan defaults and loss severity to determine if a credit loss exists. Based on this assessment, the Firm believes the unrealized losses on collateralized loan obligations are not due to credit losses.
Allowance for credit losses
Based on its assessment, the Firm did not recognize any credit-related OTTIan allowance for credit losses duringon impaired AFS securities as of January 1 or March 31, 2020.
HTM securities – credit risk
The adoption of the nine months ended September 30, 2019CECL accounting guidance requires management to estimate expected credit losses on HTM securities over the remaining expected life and 2018. Accordingly,recognize this estimate as an allowance for credit losses. As a result of the adoption of this guidance, the Firm believes that the investment securities withrecognized an unrealized loss in AOCIallowance for credit losses on HTM obligations of U.S. states and municipalities of $10 million as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of September 30, 2019,January 1, 2020.
Credit quality indicator
The primary credit quality indicator for HTM securities is the risk rating assigned to each security. At March 31, 2020, all HTM securities were rated investment grade and were current and accruing, with approximately 92% rated AAA.
Allowance for credit losses
The allowance for credit losses on HTM obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and commercial mortgage-backed securities is calculated by applying statistical credit loss factors (estimated PD and LGD) to the amortized cost (excluding accrued interest receivable). The credit loss factors are not other-than-temporarily impaired.derived using a weighted average of five internally developed eight-quarter macroeconomic scenarios, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the forecast period. Refer to Note 10 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K13 for additionalfurther information on other-than-temporary impairment.the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast.
The allowance for credit losses on HTM collateralized loan obligations is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost (excluding accrued interest receivable) and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the security’s effective interest rate. These cash flow estimates are developed based on expectations of underlying collateral performance derived using the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast and the single year straight-line interpolation, as well as considering the structural features of the security.
The use of different inputs, estimates or methodologies could change the amount of the allowance for credit losses estimated by the Firm.
The application of different inputs and assumptions into the calculation of the allowance for credit losses is subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses on HTM securities.
The allowance for credit losses on HTM securities was $19 million as of March 31, 2020, reflecting $9 million recognized in the provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
InvestmentSelected impacts of investment securities gains and losses
The following table presents realized gains and losses and OTTI from AFS securities that were recognized in income.on the Consolidated statements of income
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Realized gains | $ | 78 |
| $ | 58 |
| | $ | 454 |
| $ | 137 |
| $ | 1,095 |
| $ | 261 |
|
Realized losses | — |
| (103 | ) | | (319 | ) | (507 | ) | (862 | ) | (248 | ) |
OTTI losses(a) | — |
| (1 | ) | | — |
| (1 | ) | |
Net investment securities gains/(losses) | $ | 78 |
| $ | (46 | ) | | $ | 135 |
| $ | (371 | ) | |
Net investment securities gains | | $ | 233 |
| $ | 13 |
|
| | |
Provision for credit losses | | $ | 9 |
| NA |
|
(a) Represents OTTI losses recognized in income on investment securities theThe Firm intends to sell. Excludes realized losses on securities sold of $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 that had been previously reported as an OTTI loss due to the intentiondid not intend to sell any impaired AFS securities in the securities.periods presented.
Changes in the credit loss component of credit-impaired debt securities
The cumulative credit loss component, including any changes therein, of OTTI losses that have been recognized in income related to AFS securities was not material as of and during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.
Contractual maturities and yields
The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair value at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, of JPMorgan Chase’s investment securities portfolio by contractual maturity.
| | By remaining maturity September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Due in one year or less | Due after one year through five years | Due after five years through 10 years | Due after 10 years(b) | | Total | |
By remaining maturity March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Due in one year or less | Due after one year through five years | Due after five years through 10 years | Due after 10 years(b) | | Total |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | |
Amortized cost | $ | 14 |
| $ | 59 |
| $ | 10,230 |
| $ | 110,584 |
| | $ | 120,887 |
| $ | 2 |
| $ | 381 |
| $ | 11,827 |
| $ | 140,964 |
| | $ | 153,174 |
|
Fair value | 14 |
| 60 |
| 10,476 |
| 113,257 |
| | 123,807 |
| 2 |
| 388 |
| 12,066 |
| 144,920 |
| | 157,376 |
|
Average yield(a) | 3.59 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.92 | % | 3.45 | % | | 3.40 | % | 2.08 | % | 1.97 | % | 2.51 | % | 3.28 | % | | 3.22 | % |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 10,904 |
| $ | 95,139 |
| $ | 25,557 |
| $ | 10,046 |
| | $ | 141,646 |
| $ | 7,529 |
| $ | 95,419 |
| $ | 30,655 |
| $ | 14,873 |
| | $ | 148,476 |
|
Fair value | 10,901 |
| 95,231 |
| 25,659 |
| 9,738 |
| | 141,529 |
| 7,557 |
| 96,795 |
| 31,748 |
| 14,135 |
| | 150,235 |
|
Average yield(a) | 1.99 | % | 1.96 | % | 2.02 | % | 2.04 | % | | 1.98 | % | 0.64 | % | 0.95 | % | 1.73 | % | 1.40 | % | | 1.14 | % |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 170 |
| $ | 228 |
| $ | 1,089 |
| $ | 27,384 |
| | $ | 28,871 |
| $ | 123 |
| $ | 209 |
| $ | 1,024 |
| $ | 27,530 |
| | $ | 28,886 |
|
Fair value | 172 |
| 236 |
| 1,135 |
| 29,521 |
| | 31,064 |
| 123 |
| 217 |
| 1,080 |
| 29,125 |
| | 30,545 |
|
Average yield(a) | 3.32 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.60 | % | 4.94 | % | | 4.95 | % | 4.11 | % | 4.43 | % | 4.91 | % | 4.66 | % | | 4.67 | % |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 74 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 74 |
| $ | 76 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 76 |
|
Fair value | 74 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 74 |
| 76 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 76 |
|
Average yield(a) | 0.49 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | | 0.49 | % | 0.49 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | | 0.49 | % |
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 6,342 |
| $ | 11,580 |
| $ | 3,416 |
| $ | 306 |
| | $ | 21,644 |
| $ | 6,755 |
| $ | 11,028 |
| $ | 4,080 |
| $ | 506 |
| | $ | 22,369 |
|
Fair value | 6,350 |
| 11,870 |
| 3,633 |
| 305 |
| | 22,158 |
| 6,774 |
| 11,270 |
| 4,195 |
| 522 |
| | 22,761 |
|
Average yield(a) | 2.23 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.67 | % | | 1.95 | % | 2.34 | % | 1.80 | % | 0.85 | % | 1.41 | % | | 1.78 | % |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 216 |
| $ | 718 |
| $ | 662 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 1,596 |
| $ | 201 |
| $ | 334 |
| $ | 303 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 838 |
|
Fair value | 218 |
| 737 |
| 679 |
| — |
| | 1,634 |
| 200 |
| 313 |
| 289 |
| — |
| | 802 |
|
Average yield(a) | 4.83 | % | 3.91 | % | 3.78 | % | — | % | | 3.98 | % | 5.32 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.15 | % | — | % | | 3.91 | % |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | — |
| $ | 1,873 |
| $ | 9,411 |
| $ | 21,857 |
| | $ | 33,141 |
| $ | 112 |
| $ | 3,047 |
| $ | 11,901 |
| $ | 25,225 |
| | $ | 40,285 |
|
Fair value | — |
| 1,876 |
| 9,412 |
| 21,867 |
| | 33,155 |
| 112 |
| 3,022 |
| 11,360 |
| 23,655 |
| | 38,149 |
|
Average yield(a) | — | % | 2.94 | % | 3.17 | % | 3.03 | % | | 3.06 | % | 1.67 | % | 2.44 | % | 2.69 | % | 2.44 | % | | 2.51 | % |
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | 17,720 |
| $ | 109,597 |
| $ | 50,365 |
| $ | 170,177 |
| | $ | 347,859 |
| $ | 14,798 |
| $ | 110,418 |
| $ | 59,790 |
| $ | 209,098 |
| | $ | 394,104 |
|
Fair value | 17,729 |
| 110,010 |
| 50,994 |
| 174,688 |
| | 353,421 |
| 14,844 |
| 112,005 |
| 60,738 |
| 212,357 |
| | 399,944 |
|
Average yield(a) | 2.12 | % | 2.00 | % | 2.47 | % | 3.55 | % | | 2.83 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.10 | % | 2.08 | % | 3.22 | % | | 2.39 | % |
Held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 4,655 |
| $ | 31,321 |
| | $ | 35,976 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 5,782 |
| $ | 55,838 |
| | $ | 61,620 |
|
Fair value | — |
| — |
| 5,049 |
| 32,157 |
| | 37,206 |
| — |
| — |
| 6,402 |
| 57,396 |
| | 63,798 |
|
Average yield(a) | — | % | — | % | 3.29 | % | 3.12 | % | | 3.14 | % | — | % | — | % | 3.05 | % | 3.06 | % | | 3.06 | % |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
| | | | | | |
Amortized cost
| $ | — |
| $ | 51 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 51 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 51 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 51 |
|
Fair value
| — |
| 51 |
| — |
| — |
| | 51 |
| — |
| 53 |
| — |
| — |
| | 53 |
|
Average yield(a)
| — | % | 1.47 | % | — | % | — | % | | 1.47 | % | — | % | 1.44 | % | — | % | — | % | | 1.44 | % |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 55 |
| $ | 4,748 |
| | $ | 4,803 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 36 |
| $ | 164 |
| $ | 4,661 |
| | $ | 4,861 |
|
Fair value | — |
| — |
| 58 |
| 5,062 |
| | 5,120 |
| — |
| 37 |
| 175 |
| 4,955 |
| | 5,167 |
|
Average yield(a) | — | % | — | % | 3.89 | % | 4.02 | % | | 4.02 | % | — | % | 3.64 | % | 3.79 | % | 3.94 | % | | 3.93 | % |
Asset-backed securities | | | | |
Amortized cost | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 4,054 |
| $ | 633 |
| | $ | 4,687 |
|
Fair value | | — |
| — |
| 3,901 |
| 605 |
| | 4,506 |
|
Average yield(a) | | — | % | — | % | 2.97 | % | 2.99 | % | | 2.97 | % |
Total held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Amortized cost | $ | — |
| $ | 51 |
| $ | 4,710 |
| $ | 36,069 |
| | $ | 40,830 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 87 |
| $ | 10,000 |
| $ | 61,132 |
| | $ | 71,219 |
|
Fair value | — |
| 51 |
| 5,107 |
| 37,219 |
| | 42,377 |
| — |
| 90 |
| 10,478 |
| 62,956 |
| | 73,524 |
|
Average yield(a) | — | % | 1.47 | % | 3.30 | % | 3.24 | % | | 3.24 | % | — | % | 2.35 | % | 3.03 | % | 3.13 | % | | 3.11 | % |
| |
(a) | Average yield is computed using the effective yield of each security owned at the end of the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield considers the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. The effective yield excludes unscheduled principal prepayments; and accordingly, actual maturities of securities may differ from their contractual or expected maturities as certain securities may be prepaid. |
| |
(b) | Substantially all of the Firm’s U.S. residential MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in 10 years or more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated weighted-average life, which reflects anticipated future prepayments, is approximately 54 years for agency residential MBS, 3 years for agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations and 3 years for nonagency residential collateralized mortgage obligations. |
Note 1011 – Securities financing activities
JPMorgan Chase enters into resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements (collectively, “securities financing agreements”) primarily to finance the Firm’s inventory positions, acquire securities to cover short sales, accommodate customers’ financing needs, settle other securities obligations and to deploy the Firm’s excess cash.
Securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance, securities financing agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis. Refer to Note 11 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K1 for afurther discussion of accounting policies relating tothe offsetting of assets and liabilities. Fees received and paid in connection with securities financing activities.agreements are recorded over the life of the agreement in interest income and interest expense on the Consolidated statements of income.
The Firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements. Refer to Note 3 for further information regarding the fair value option. The securities borrowed and securities lendingfinancing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected.elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements, securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and securities borrowed on the Consolidated balance sheets. Generally, for agreements carried at fair value, current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense, with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue. However, for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments, all changes in fair value, including any interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue.
Securities financing agreements not elected under the fair value option are measured at amortized cost. As a result of the Firm’s credit risk mitigation practices described below, the Firm did not hold any allowance for credit losses with respect to resale and securities borrowed arrangements as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
Credit risk mitigation practices
Securities financing agreements expose the Firm primarily to credit and liquidity risk. To manage these risks, the Firm monitors the value of the underlying securities (predominantly high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSEs and government agencies MBS) that it has received from or provided to its counterparties compared to the value of cash proceeds and exchanged collateral, and either requests additional collateral or returns securities or collateral when appropriate. Margin levels are initially established based upon the counterparty, the type of underlying securities, and the permissible collateral, and are monitored on an ongoing basis.
In resale and securities borrowed agreements, the Firm is exposed to credit risk to the extent that the value of the securities received is less than initial cash principal advanced and any collateral amounts exchanged. In repurchase and securities loaned agreements, credit risk exposure arises to the extent that the value of underlying securities advanced exceeds the value of the initial cash principal received, and any collateral amounts exchanged.
Additionally, the Firm typically enters into master netting agreements and other similar arrangements with its counterparties, which provide for the right to liquidate the underlying securities and any collateral amounts exchanged in the event of a counterparty default. It is also the Firm’s policy to take possession, where possible, of the securities underlying resale and securities borrowed agreements. Refer to Note 2324 for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements.
The table below summarizes the gross and net amounts of the Firm’s securities financing agreements as of September 30, 2019 March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018. 2019. When the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to a master netting agreement with a counterparty and where other relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP are met, the Firm nets, on the Consolidated balance sheets, the
balances outstanding under its securities financing agreements with the same counterparty. In addition, the Firm exchanges securities and/or cash collateral with its counterparty to reduce the economic exposure with the counterparty, but
such collateral is not eligible for net Consolidated balance sheet presentation. Where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the counterparty master netting agreement, such collateral, along with securities financing balances that do not meet all these relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP, is presented in the table below as “Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets,” and reduces the “Net amounts” presented. Where a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, the securities financing balances are presented gross in the “Net amounts” below.
| | | September 30, 2019 | March 31, 2020 |
(in millions) | Gross amounts | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) | Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(c) | Net amounts(d) | Gross amounts | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) | Net amounts(c) |
Assets | | | | | | |
Securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | 630,033 |
| $ | (372,650 | ) | $ | 257,383 |
| $ | (244,241 | ) | | $ | 13,142 |
| $ | 687,109 |
| $ | (438,559 | ) | $ | 248,550 |
| $ | (233,013 | ) | | $ | 15,537 |
|
Securities borrowed | 160,304 |
| (21,968 | ) | 138,336 |
| (104,517 | ) | | 33,819 |
| 152,908 |
| (13,069 | ) | 139,839 |
| (101,374 | ) | | 38,465 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 608,618 |
| $ | (372,650 | ) | $ | 235,968 |
| $ | (213,150 | ) | | $ | 22,818 |
| $ | 662,472 |
| $ | (438,559 | ) | $ | 223,913 |
| $ | (193,881 | ) | | $ | 30,032 |
|
Securities loaned and other(a) | 34,104 |
| (21,968 | ) | 12,136 |
| (11,878 | ) | | 258 |
| 23,830 |
| (13,069 | ) | 10,761 |
| (10,582 | ) | | 179 |
|
| | | December 31, 2018 | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Gross amounts | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) | Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(c) | Net amounts(d) | Gross amounts | Amounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheets | Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) | Net amounts(c) |
Assets | | | | | | |
Securities purchased under resale agreements | $ | 691,116 |
| $ | (369,612 | ) | $ | 321,504 |
| $ | (308,854 | ) |
| $ | 12,650 |
| $ | 628,609 |
| $ | (379,463 | ) | $ | 249,146 |
| $ | (233,818 | ) |
| $ | 15,328 |
|
Securities borrowed | 132,955 |
| (20,960 | ) | 111,995 |
| (79,747 | ) | | 32,248 |
| 166,718 |
| (26,960 | ) | 139,758 |
| (104,990 | ) | | 34,768 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 541,587 |
| $ | (369,612 | ) | $ | 171,975 |
| $ | (149,125 | ) |
| $ | 22,850 |
| $ | 555,172 |
| $ | (379,463 | ) | $ | 175,709 |
| $ | (151,566 | ) |
| $ | 24,143 |
|
Securities loaned and other(a) | 33,700 |
| (20,960 | ) | 12,740 |
| (12,358 | ) | | 382 |
| 36,649 |
| (26,960 | ) | 9,689 |
| (9,654 | ) | | 35 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes securities-for-securities lending agreements of $2.4$4.1 billion and $3.3$3.7 billion at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, accounted for at fair value, where the Firm is acting as lender. In the Consolidated balance sheets, the Firm recognizes the securities received at fair value within other assets and the obligation to return those securities within accounts payable and other liabilities. |
| |
(b) | Includes securities financing agreements accounted for at fair value. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, included securities purchased under resale agreements of $13.7 billion and $13.2 billion, respectively; securities sold under repurchase agreements of $933 million and $935 million, respectively; and securities borrowed of $5.8 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively. There were 0 securities loaned accounted for at fair value in either period. |
| |
(c) | In some cases, collateral exchanged with a counterparty exceeds the net asset or liability balance with that counterparty. In such cases, the amounts reported in this column are limited to the related net asset or liability with that counterparty. |
| |
(d)(c) | Includes securities financing agreements that provide collateral rights, but where an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement has not been either sought or obtained. At September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, included $9.1$12.3 billion and $7.9$11.0 billion, respectively, of securities purchased under resale agreements; $30.6$34.9 billion and $30.3$31.9 billion, respectively, of securities borrowed; $21.9$28.5 billion and $21.5$22.7 billion, respectively, of securities sold under repurchase agreements; and $96$9 million and $25$7 million, respectively, of securities loaned and other. |
The tables below present as of September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018 2019 the types of financial assets pledged in securities financing agreements and the remaining contractual maturity of the securities financing agreements.
| | | Gross liability balance | Gross liability balance |
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | Securities loaned and other | | Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | Securities loaned and other | Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | Securities loaned and other | | Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | Securities loaned and other |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 33,399 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34,311 |
| (a) | $ | — |
| $ | 60,742 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34,119 |
| | $ | — |
|
Residential - nonagency | 1,804 |
| | — |
| | 2,165 |
| | — |
| 1,860 |
| | — |
| | 1,239 |
| | — |
|
Commercial - nonagency | 1,778 |
| | — |
| | 1,390 |
| | — |
| 1,931 |
| | — |
| | 1,612 |
| | — |
|
U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies | 366,820 |
| | 8 |
| | 317,578 |
| (a) | 69 |
| 390,151 |
| | 92 |
| | 334,398 |
| | 29 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities | 1,400 |
| | — |
| | 1,150 |
| | — |
| 1,793 |
| | — |
| | 1,181 |
| | — |
|
Non-U.S. government debt | 165,568 |
| | 1,769 |
| | 154,900 |
| | 4,313 |
| 165,715 |
| | 1,559 |
| | 145,548 |
| | 1,528 |
|
Corporate debt securities | 13,067 |
| | 1,361 |
| | 13,898 |
| | 428 |
| 21,855 |
| | 1,582 |
| | 13,826 |
| | 1,580 |
|
Asset-backed securities | 1,746 |
| | — |
| | 3,867 |
| | — |
| 3,074 |
| | — |
| | 1,794 |
| | — |
|
Equity securities | 23,036 |
| | 30,966 |
| | 12,328 |
| | 28,890 |
| 15,351 |
| | 20,597 |
| | 21,455 |
| | 33,512 |
|
Total | $ | 608,618 |
| | $ | 34,104 |
| | $ | 541,587 |
| | $ | 33,700 |
| $ | 662,472 |
| | $ | 23,830 |
| | $ | 555,172 |
| | $ | 36,649 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements |
| Overnight and continuous | | | | | | Greater than 90 days | | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | | | Total |
Total securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 276,704 |
| | $ | 222,320 |
| | $ | 91,030 |
| | $ | 72,418 |
| | $ | 662,472 |
|
Total securities loaned and other | 20,610 |
| | 100 |
| | 697 |
| | 2,423 |
| | 23,830 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements |
| Overnight and continuous | | | | | | Greater than 90 days | | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | | | Total |
Total securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 225,134 |
| | $ | 195,816 |
| (a) | $ | 56,020 |
| (a) | $ | 78,202 |
| (a) | $ | 555,172 |
|
Total securities loaned and other | 32,028 |
| | 1,706 |
| | 937 |
| | 1,978 |
| | 36,649 |
|
| |
(a) | The prior periodprior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements |
| Overnight and continuous | | | | | Greater than 90 days | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | Total |
Total securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 336,082 |
| | $ | 132,662 |
| | $ | 53,504 |
| $ | 86,370 |
| $ | 608,618 |
|
Total securities loaned and other | 30,172 |
| | 231 |
| | 748 |
| 2,953 |
| 34,104 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements |
| Overnight and continuous | | | | | Greater than 90 days | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | Total |
Total securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 247,579 |
| | $ | 174,971 |
| | $ | 71,637 |
| $ | 47,400 |
| $ | 541,587 |
|
Total securities loaned and other | 28,402 |
| | 997 |
| | 2,132 |
| 2,169 |
| 33,700 |
|
Transfers not qualifying for sale accounting
At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm held $654$581 million and $2.1 billion,$743 million, respectively, of financial assets for which the rights have been transferred to third parties; however, the transfers did not qualify as a sale in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These transfers have been recognized as collateralized financing transactions. The transferred assets are recorded in trading assets and loans, and the corresponding liabilities are recorded predominantly in short-term borrowings on the Consolidated balance sheets. The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation.
Note 1112 – Loans
Loan accounting framework
The accounting for a loan depends on management’s strategy for the loan, and on whether the loan was credit-impaired at the date of acquisition.loan. The Firm accounts for loans based on the following categories:
| |
• | Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment (i.e., “retained”), other than PCI loans |
Loans held-for-sale
Loans at fair value
PCIEffective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
The following provides a detailed accounting discussion of these loan categories:
Loans held-for-investment
Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment are recorded at the principal amount outstanding, net of the following: charge-offs; interest applied to principal (for loans accounted for on the cost recovery method); unamortized discounts and premiums; and net deferred loan fees or costs. Credit card loans also include billed finance charges and fees.
Interest income
Interest income on performing loans held-for-investment is accrued and recognized as interest income at the contractual rate of interest. Purchase price discounts or premiums, as well as net deferred loan fees or costs, are amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment of yield.
The Firm classifies accrued interest on loans, including accrued but unbilled interest on credit card loans, in accrued interest and accounts receivables on the Consolidated balance sheets. For credit card loans, accrued interest is recognized in the loan balances as it is billed, with the related allowance recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest on credit card loans are recognized in the provision for credit losses and charge-offs are recognized by reversing interest income. For other loans, the Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income.
Nonaccrual loans
Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status and considered nonperforming when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. A loan is determined to be past due when the minimum payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date or for
certain loans (e.g., residential real estate loans), when a monthly payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. Finally, collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status.
On the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. In addition, the amortization of deferred amounts is suspended. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized as cash interest payments are received (i.e., on a cash basis) if the recorded loan balance is deemed fully collectible; however, if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of the recorded loan balance, all interest cash receipts are applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan (the cost recovery method). For consumer loans, application of this policy typically results in the Firm recognizing interest income on nonaccrual consumer loans on a cash basis.
A loan may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the terms of the restructured loan.
As permitted by regulatory guidance, credit card loans are generally exempt from being placed on nonaccrual status; accordingly, interest and fees related to credit card loans continue to accrue until the loan is charged off or paid in full.
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated expected credit losses in the held-for-investment loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and is recognized on the balance sheet as a contra asset, which brings the amortized cost to the net carrying value. Changes in the allowance for loan losses are recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 1213 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for loan losses.
Charge-offs
Consumer loans are generally charged off or charged down to the net realizable value of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-Kthe underlying collateral (i.e., fair value less estimated costs to sell), with an offset to the allowance for loan losses, upon reaching specified stages of delinquency in accordance with standards established by the FFIEC. Residential real estate loans, unmodified credit card loans and scored business banking loans are generally charged off no later than 180 days past due. Scored auto and modified credit card loans are charged off no later than 120 days past due.
Certain consumer loans are charged off or charged down to their net realizable value earlier than the FFIEC charge-off standards in certain circumstances as follows:
Loans modified in a detailed discussionTDR that are determined to be collateral-dependent.
Loans to borrowers who have experienced an event that suggests a loss is either known or highly certain are subject to accelerated charge-off standards (e.g., residential real estate and auto loans are charged off within 60 days of receiving notification of a bankruptcy filing).
Auto loans upon repossession of the automobile.
Other than in certain limited circumstances, the Firm typically does not recognize charge-offs on the government-guaranteed portion of loans.
Wholesale loans are charged off when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized. The determination of whether to recognize a charge-off includes many factors, including accountingthe prioritization of the Firm’s claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan and valuation of the borrower’s equity or the loan collateral.
When a loan is charged down to the estimated net realizable value, the determination of the fair value of the collateral depends on the type of collateral (e.g., securities, real estate). In cases where the collateral is in the form of liquid securities, the fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker quotes. For illiquid securities or other financial assets, the fair value of the collateral is generally estimated using a discounted cash flow model.
For residential real estate loans, collateral values are based upon external valuation sources. When it becomes likely that a borrower is either unable or unwilling to pay, the Firm utilizes a broker’s price opinion, appraisal and/or an automated valuation model of the home based on an exterior-only valuation (“exterior opinions”), which is then updated at least every twelve months, or more frequently depending on various market factors. As soon as practicable after the Firm receives the property in satisfaction of a debt (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession), the Firm generally obtains an appraisal based on an inspection that includes the interior of the home (“interior appraisals”). Exterior opinions and interior appraisals are discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values as compared with the estimated values provided by exterior opinions and interior appraisals, considering state-specific factors.
For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on appraisals from internal and external valuation sources. Collateral values are typically updated every six to twelve months, either by obtaining a new appraisal or by performing an internal analysis, in accordance with the Firm’s policies. The Firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors, which may result in obtaining appraisal updates or broker price opinions at more frequent intervals.
Loans held-for-sale
Loans held-for-sale are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes recorded in noninterest revenue. For consumer loans, the valuation is performed on a portfolio basis. For wholesale loans, the valuation is performed on an individual loan basis.
Interest income on loans held-for-sale is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest.
Loan origination fees or costs and purchase price discounts or premiums are deferred in a contra loan account until the related loan is sold. The deferred fees or costs and discounts or premiums are an adjustment to the basis of the loan and therefore are included in the periodic determination of the lower of cost or fair value adjustments and/or the gain or loss recognized at the time of sale.
Because these loans are recognized at the lower of cost or fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans held-for-sale are subject to the nonaccrual policies described above.
Loans at fair value
Loans used in a market-making strategy or risk managed on a fair value basis are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue.
Interest income on these loans is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest revenue. Loan origination fees are recognized upfront in noninterest revenue. Loan origination costs are recognized in the associated expense category as incurred.
Because these loans are recognized at fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans at fair value are subject to the nonaccrual policies described above.
Refer to Note 3 of this Form 10-Q for further information on the Firm’s elections of fair value accounting under the fair value option. Refer to Note 2 of this Form 10-Qand Note 3 for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets.
Loan classification changes
Loans in the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer. Credit-related losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses; non-credit related losses such as those due to changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in noninterest revenue.
In the event that management decides to retain a loan in the held-for-sale portfolio, the loan is transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer. These loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the Firm’s allowance methodology. Refer to Note 13 for a further discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the Firm’s allowance for loan losses.
Loan modifications
The Firm seeks to modify certain loans in conjunction with its loss mitigation activities. Through the modification, JPMorgan Chase grants one or more concessions to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty in order to minimize the Firm’s economic loss and avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral, and to ultimately maximize payments received by the Firm from the borrower. The concessions granted vary by program and by borrower-specific characteristics, and may include interest rate reductions, term extensions, payment delays, principal forgiveness, or the acceptance of equity or other assets in lieu of payments. Such modifications are accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term and other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs.
The Firm’s initial response to many borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic included offering loan modifications, such as 90-day payment delays and waiving or refunding certain fees. These initial short-term and other insignificant modifications were not considered concessions and, therefore, do not result in the related loans being considered TDRs.
Loans, except for credit card loans, modified in a TDR are generally placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status (the accrual of interest is resumed) if the following criteria are met: (i) the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a minimum of six months and/or 6 payments, and (ii) the Firm has an expectation that repayment of the modified loan is reasonably assured based on, for example, the borrower’s debt capacity and level of future earnings, collateral values, LTV ratios, and other current market considerations. In certain limited and well-defined circumstances in which the loan is current at the modification date, such loans are not placed on nonaccrual status at the time of modification.
Loans modified in TDRs are generally measured for impairment using the Firm’s established asset-specific
allowance methodology, which considers the expected re-default rates for the modified loans. A loan modified in a TDR generally remains subject tothe asset-specific component of the allowance throughout its remaining life, regardless of whether the loan is performing and has been returned to accrual status. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the methodology used to estimate the Firm’s asset-specific allowance.
Foreclosed property
The Firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructurings, workouts, and foreclosures. Property acquired may include real property (e.g., residential real estate, land, and buildings) and commercial and personal property (e.g., automobiles, aircraft, railcars, and ships).
The Firm recognizes foreclosed property upon receiving assets in satisfaction of a loan (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession). For loans collateralized by real property, the Firm generally recognizes the asset received at foreclosure sale or upon the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction with the borrower. Foreclosed assets are reported in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets and initially recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, to the lower of cost or fair value. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are charged/credited to noninterest revenue. Operating expense, such as real estate taxes and maintenance, are charged to other expense.
Loan portfolio
The Firm’s loan portfolio is divided into three3 portfolio segments, which are the same segments used by the Firm to determine the allowance for loan losses: Consumer, excluding credit card; Credit card; and Wholesale. Within each portfolio segment the Firm monitors and assesses the credit risk in the following classes of loans, based on the risk characteristics of each loan class.
In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm revised its classes of loans. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation:
The consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment’s residential mortgage and home equity loans and lending-related commitments have been combined into a residential real estate class.
Upon adoption of CECL, the Firm elected to discontinue the pool-level accounting for PCI loans and to account for these loans on an individual loan basis. PCI loans are considered PCD loans under CECL and are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual and charge-off policies. PCD loans are now reported in the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment’s residential real estate class.
Risk-rated business banking and auto dealer loans and lending-related commitments held in CCB were reclassified from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment, to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. The remaining scored auto and business banking loans and lending-related commitments have been combined into an auto and other class.
The wholesale portfolio segment’s classes, previously based on the borrower’s primary business activity, have been revised to align with the loan classifications as defined by the bank regulatory agencies, based on the loan’s collateral, purpose, and type of borrower.
|
| | | | |
Consumer, excluding credit card(a) | | Credit card | | Wholesale(f)(c) |
• Residential real estate – excluding PCI • Residential mortgage(b)(a)
• Home equityAuto and other(c)(b) Other consumer loans(d)
• Auto
• Consumer & Business Banking(e)
Residential real estate – PCI
• Home equity
• Prime mortgage
• Subprime mortgage
• Option ARMs
| | • Credit card loans | | • Secured by real estate • Commercial and industrial • Real estate
• Financial institutions
• Governments & Agencies
• Other(g)(d) |
| |
(a) | Includes loans held in CCB, scored prime mortgage and scored home equity loans held in AWMCCB and primeAWM,and scored mortgage loans held in Corporate. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly includes primeIncludes scored auto and business banking loans (including option ARMs).and overdrafts. |
| |
(c) | Includes seniorloans held in CIB, CB, AWM, Corporate as well as risk-rated business banking and junior lien home equity loans.auto dealer loans held in CCB for which the wholesale methodology is applied for determining the allowance for loan losses. |
| |
(d) | Includes certain business bankingloans to financial institutions, states and auto dealer risk-ratedpolitical subdivisions, SPEs, nonprofits, personal investment companies and trusts, as well as loans that apply the wholesale methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by CCB, and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included with the other consumer loan classes. |
| |
(e) | Predominantly includes Business Banking loans. |
| |
(f) | Includes loans held in CIB, CB, AWM and Corporate. Excludes scored prime mortgage and scored home equity loans held in AWM and prime mortgage loans held in Corporate. Classes are internally defined and may not align with regulatory definitions. |
| |
(g) | Includes loans to:to individuals and individual entities (predominantly consists of Wealth Management clients within AWM and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts), SPEs and Private education and civic organizations.AWM). Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for more information on SPEs. |
The following tables summarize the Firm’s loan balances by portfolio segment.
| | September 30, 2019 | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card(a) | | Wholesale | | Total | | |
March 31, 2020 | | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card | | Wholesale | | Total(a) | |
(in millions) | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card(a) | | Wholesale | | Total | | |
Retained | (b) | $ | 293,779 |
| | $ | 154,021 |
| | $ | 555,289 |
| | $ | 1,003,089 |
| (b) |
Held-for-sale | 4,821 |
| | — |
| | 5,750 |
| | 10,571 |
| | 1,848 |
| | — |
| | 4,224 |
| | 6,072 |
| |
At fair value | — |
| | — |
| | 5,760 |
| | 5,760 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,214 |
| | 6,214 |
| |
Total | $ | 336,630 |
| | $ | 159,571 |
| | $ | 449,017 |
| | $ | 945,218 |
| | $ | 295,627 |
| | $ | 154,021 |
| | $ | 565,727 |
| | $ | 1,015,375 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2018 | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card(a) | | Wholesale | | Total | | |
December 31, 2019 | | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card | | Wholesale | | Total(a) | |
(in millions) | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card(a) | | Wholesale | | Total | | |
Retained | (b) | $ | 294,999 |
| | $ | 168,924 |
| | $ | 481,678 |
| | $ | 945,601 |
| (b) |
Held-for-sale | 95 |
| | 16 |
| | 11,877 |
| | 11,988 |
| | 3,002 |
| | — |
| | 4,062 |
| | 7,064 |
| |
At fair value | — |
| | — |
| | 3,151 |
| | 3,151 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,104 |
| | 7,104 |
| |
Total | $ | 373,732 |
| | $ | 156,632 |
| | $ | 454,190 |
| | $ | 984,554 |
| | $ | 298,001 |
| | $ | 168,924 |
| | $ | 492,844 |
| | $ | 959,769 |
| |
| |
(a) | Includes accrued interest and fees net of an allowance for the uncollectible portionExcludes $2.9 billion of accrued interest receivables at both March 31, 2020 and fee income.December 31, 2019, respectively. Accrued interest receivables of $14 million and $12 million were written off for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Loans (other than PCI loans and loansthose for which the fair value option has been elected) are presented net of unamortized discounts and premiums and net deferred loan fees or costs. These amounts were not material as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019. |
The following tables providetable provides information about the carrying value of retained loans purchased, sold and reclassified to held-for-sale during the periods indicated. Reclassifications of loans to held-for sale are non-cash transactions. The Firm manages its exposure to credit risk on an ongoing basis. Selling loans is one way that the Firm reduces its credit exposures. Loans that were reclassified to held-for-sale and sold in a subsequent period are excluded from the sales line of this table.
| |
| |
| 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) | |
| Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total |
Purchases | |
| $ | 259 |
| (a)(b) | $ | — |
| $ | 453 |
| $ | 712 |
| | $ | 561 |
| (a)(b) | $ | — |
| $ | 285 |
| $ | 846 |
| $ | 1,172 |
| (b)(c) | $ | — |
| $ | 386 |
| $ | 1,558 |
| | $ | 551 |
| (b)(c) | $ | — |
| $ | 229 |
| $ | 780 |
|
Sales | |
| 14,970 |
|
| — |
| 5,559 |
| 20,529 |
| | 1,789 |
| | — |
| 4,197 |
| 5,986 |
| 324 |
|
| — |
| 5,452 |
| 5,776 |
| | 8,658 |
| | — |
| 5,445 |
| 14,103 |
|
Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a) | |
| 3,889 |
| | — |
| 359 |
| 4,248 |
| | — |
|
| — |
| 666 |
| 666 |
| 148 |
| | — |
| 469 |
| 617 |
| | 4,113 |
|
| — |
| 501 |
| 4,614 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | |
Purchases | | $ | 1,044 |
| (a)(b) | $ | — |
| $ | 1,041 |
| $ | 2,085 |
| | $ | 2,164 |
| (a)(b) | $ | — |
| $ | 1,915 |
| $ | 4,079 |
| |
Sales | | 30,484 |
| | — |
| 16,404 |
| 46,888 |
| | 4,661 |
| | — |
| 12,829 |
| 17,490 |
| |
Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale | | 8,950 |
| | — |
| 1,784 |
| 10,734 |
| | 36 |
| | — |
| 1,926 |
| 1,962 |
| |
| |
(a) | Purchases predominantly representReclassifications of loans to held-for-sale are non-cash transactions. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly includes purchases of residential real estate loans, including the Firm’s voluntary repurchaserepurchases of certain delinquent loans from loan pools as permitted by Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) guidelines.guidelines for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. The Firm typically elects to repurchase these delinquent loans as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with applicable requirements of Ginnie Mae, FHA, RHS, and/or VA. |
| |
(b)(c) | Excludes purchases of retained loans sourced through the correspondent origination channel and underwritten in accordance with the Firm’s standards. Such purchases were $4.7$3.6 billion and $5.6$3.2 billion for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $12.2 billion and $14.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
Gains and losses on sales of loans
Net gainslosses on sales of loans and lending-related commitments (including adjustments to record loans and lending-related commitments held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value) recognized in noninterest revenue were $254$913 million and $433of which $142 million related to loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.March 31, 2020. Gains and losses on sales of loans were 0t material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019 . In addition, the sale of loans may also result in write downs, recoveries or changes in the allowance recognized in the provision for credit losses.
Consumer, excluding credit card loan portfolio
Consumer loans, excluding credit card loans, consist primarily of scored residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto loans and consumer and business banking loans, with a focus on serving the prime consumer credit market. The portfolio also includes home equity loans secured by junior liens, prime mortgage loans with an interest-only payment period and certain payment-option loans that may result in negative amortization.
The following table provides information about retained consumer loans, excluding credit card, by class. |
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
|
Residential real estate – excluding PCI | | |
Residential mortgage | $ | 197,456 |
| $ | 231,078 |
|
Home equity | 24,954 |
| 28,340 |
|
Other consumer loans | | |
Auto | 61,410 |
| 63,573 |
|
Consumer & Business Banking | 26,699 |
| 26,612 |
|
Residential real estate – PCI | | |
Home equity | 7,753 |
| 8,963 |
|
Prime mortgage | 4,164 |
| 4,690 |
|
Subprime mortgage | 1,797 |
| 1,945 |
|
Option ARMs | 7,576 |
| 8,436 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 331,809 |
| $ | 373,637 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Residential real estate | $ | 242,349 |
| $ | 243,317 |
|
Auto and other | 51,430 |
| 51,682 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 293,779 |
| $ | 294,999 |
|
Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on consumer
Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicators.indicator for consumer loans. Loans that are more than 30 days past due provide an early warning of borrowers who may be experiencing financial difficulties and/or who may be unable or unwilling to repay the loan. As the loan continues to age, it becomes more clear whether the borrower is likely either unable or unwilling to pay. In the case of residential real estate loans, late-stage delinquencies (greater than 150 days past due) are a strong indicator of loans that will ultimately result in a foreclosure or similar liquidation transaction. In addition to delinquency rates, other credit quality indicators for consumer loans vary based on the class of loan, as follows:
For residential real estate loans, the current estimated LTV ratio, or the combined LTV ratio in the case of junior lien loans, is an indicator of the potential loss severity in the event of default. Additionally, LTV or combined LTV ratios can provide insight into a borrower’s continued willingness to pay, as the delinquency rate of high-LTV loans tends to be greater than that for loans where the borrower has equity in the collateral. The geographic distribution of the loan collateral also provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio, as factors such as the regional economy, home price changes and specific events such as natural disasters, will affect credit quality. The borrower’s current or “refreshed” FICO score is a secondary credit quality indicator for certain loans, as FICO scores are an indication of the borrower’s credit payment history. Thus, a loan to a borrower with a low FICO score (less than 660 ) is considered to be of higher risk than a loan to a borrower with a higher FICO score. Further, a loan to a borrower with a high LTV ratio and a low FICO score is at greater risk of default than a loan to a borrower that has both a high LTV ratio and a high FICO score.
For scored auto and business banking loans, geographic distribution is an indicator of the credit performance of the portfolio. Similar to residential real estate loans, geographic distribution provides insights into the portfolio performance based on regional economic activity and events.
Residential real estate – excluding PCI loans
The following table provides information by classon delinquency, which is the primary credit quality indicator for retained residential real estate – excluding PCI loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential real estate – excluding PCI loans | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Residential mortgage | | | Home equity | | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Loan delinquency(a) | | | | | | | | | | |
Current | $ | 196,354 |
| $ | 225,899 |
| | | $ | 24,398 |
| $ | 27,611 |
| | | $ | 220,752 |
| $ | 253,510 |
|
30–149 days past due | 691 |
| 2,763 |
| | | 355 |
| 453 |
| | | 1,046 |
| 3,216 |
|
150 or more days past due | 411 |
| 2,416 |
| | | 201 |
| 276 |
| | | 612 |
| 2,692 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 197,456 |
| $ | 231,078 |
| | | $ | 24,954 |
| $ | 28,340 |
| | | $ | 222,410 |
| $ | 259,418 |
|
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b) | 0.53 | % | 0.48 | % | | | 2.23 | % | 2.57 | % | | | 0.72 | % | 0.71 | % |
90 or more days past due and government guaranteed(c) | $ | 40 |
| $ | 2,541 |
| | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | | $ | 40 |
| $ | 2,541 |
|
Nonaccrual loans | 1,629 |
| 1,765 |
| | | 1,208 |
| 1,323 |
| | | 2,837 |
| 3,088 |
|
Current estimated LTV ratios(d)(e) | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | $ | 25 |
| $ | 25 |
| | | $ | 4 |
| $ | 6 |
| | | $ | 29 |
| $ | 31 |
|
Less than 660 | 20 |
| 13 |
| | | 2 |
| 1 |
| | | 22 |
| 14 |
|
101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | 22 |
| 37 |
| | | 68 |
| 111 |
| | | 90 |
| 148 |
|
Less than 660 | 35 |
| 53 |
| | | 23 |
| 38 |
| | | 58 |
| 91 |
|
80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores: | | | | | | | | | | |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 4,650 |
| 3,977 |
| | | 697 |
| 986 |
| | | 5,347 |
| 4,963 |
|
Less than 660 | 212 |
| 281 |
| | | 214 |
| 326 |
| | | 426 |
| 607 |
|
Less than 80% and refreshed FICO scores: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | 185,438 |
| 212,505 |
| | | 20,394 |
| 22,632 |
| | | 205,832 |
| 235,137 |
|
Less than 660 | 6,035 |
| 6,457 |
| | | 2,842 |
| 3,355 |
| | | 8,877 |
| 9,812 |
|
No FICO/LTV available | 952 |
| 813 |
| | | 710 |
| 885 |
| | | 1,662 |
| 1,698 |
|
U.S. government-guaranteed | 67 |
| 6,917 |
| | | — |
| — |
| | | 67 |
| 6,917 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 197,456 |
| $ | 231,078 |
| | | $ | 24,954 |
| $ | 28,340 |
| | | $ | 222,410 |
| $ | 259,418 |
|
Geographic region(f) | | | | | | | | | | |
California | $ | 66,166 |
| $ | 74,759 |
| | | $ | 5,074 |
| $ | 5,695 |
| | | $ | 71,240 |
| $ | 80,454 |
|
New York | 25,442 |
| 28,847 |
| | | 5,074 |
| 5,769 |
| | | 30,516 |
| 34,616 |
|
Illinois | 13,304 |
| 15,249 |
| | | 1,868 |
| 2,131 |
| | | 15,172 |
| 17,380 |
|
Texas | 12,345 |
| 13,769 |
| | | 1,640 |
| 1,819 |
| | | 13,985 |
| 15,588 |
|
Florida | 10,195 |
| 10,704 |
| | | 1,366 |
| 1,575 |
| | | 11,561 |
| 12,279 |
|
Washington | 7,638 |
| 8,304 |
| | | 762 |
| 869 |
| | | 8,400 |
| 9,173 |
|
Colorado | 7,577 |
| 8,140 |
| | | 458 |
| 521 |
| | | 8,035 |
| 8,661 |
|
New Jersey | 5,749 |
| 7,302 |
| | | 1,447 |
| 1,642 |
| | | 7,196 |
| 8,944 |
|
Massachusetts | 5,610 |
| 6,574 |
| | | 208 |
| 236 |
| | | 5,818 |
| 6,810 |
|
Arizona | 3,862 |
| 4,434 |
| | | 986 |
| 1,158 |
| | | 4,848 |
| 5,592 |
|
All other(g) | 39,568 |
| 52,996 |
| | | 6,071 |
| 6,925 |
| | | 45,639 |
| 59,921 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 197,456 |
| $ | 231,078 |
| | | $ | 24,954 |
| $ | 28,340 |
| | | $ | 222,410 |
| $ | 259,418 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
|
Term loans by origination year | | Revolving loans | | Total | | Total |
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | Prior to 2016 | | Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | | |
Loan delinquency(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current | $ | 10,590 |
| $ | 42,800 |
| $ | 21,088 |
| $ | 30,504 |
| $ | 39,809 |
| $ | 67,311 |
| | $ | 8,213 |
| $ | 18,927 |
| | $ | 239,242 |
| | $ | 239,979 |
|
30–149 days past due | — |
| 7 |
| 11 |
| 33 |
| 57 |
| 1,368 |
| | 7 |
| 444 |
| | 1,927 |
| | 1,910 |
|
150 or more days past due | — |
| — |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 9 |
| 877 |
| | 13 |
| 260 |
| | 1,180 |
| | 1,428 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 10,590 |
| $ | 42,807 |
| $ | 21,109 |
| $ | 30,548 |
| $ | 39,875 |
| $ | 69,556 |
| | $ | 8,233 |
| $ | 19,631 |
| | $ | 242,349 |
| | $ | 243,317 |
|
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b) | — | % | 0.02 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.17 | % | 3.17 | % | | 0.24 | % | 3.59 | % | | 1.27 | % | | 1.35 | % |
| |
(a) | Individual delinquency classifications include mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies as follows: current included $20$15 million and $2.8 billion;$17 million; 30–149 days past due included $16$13 million and $2.1 billion;$20 million; and 150 or more days past due included $31$25 million and $2.0 billion$26 million at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. |
| |
(b) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, residential mortgagereal estate loans excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $47$38 million and $4.1 billion,$46 million, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. |
| |
(c) | These balances, which are 90 days or more past due, were excluded from nonaccrual loans as the loans are guaranteed by U.S government agencies. Typically the principal balance of the loans is insured and interest is guaranteed at a specified reimbursement rate subject to meeting agreed-upon servicing guidelines. At September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, these balances included $38 million and $999 million, respectively, of loans that are no longer accruing interest based on the agreed-upon servicing guidelines. For the remaining balance, interest is being accrued at the guaranteed reimbursement rate. There were 0 loans that were not guaranteed by U.S. government agencies that are 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest at September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. |
| |
(d) | Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. |
| |
(e) | Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis. |
| |
(f) | The geographic regions presented in the table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at September 30, 2019. |
| |
(g) | At September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $67 million and $6.9 billion, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from the geographic regions presented based upon the government guarantee. |
Approximately 37%33% of the home equity portfoliototal revolving loans are senior lien loans; the remaining balance are junior lien HELOANs or HELOCs.loans. The following table provideslien position the Firm holds is considered in the Firm’s delinquency statisticsallowance for junior lien home equityloan losses. Revolving loans and lines of credit as of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total loans | | Total 30+ day delinquency rate |
(in millions, except ratios) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
|
HELOCs:(a) | | | | | |
Within the revolving period(b) | $ | 5,625 |
| $ | 5,608 |
| | 0.37 | % | 0.25 | % |
Beyond the revolving period | 9,283 |
| 11,286 |
| | 2.47 |
| 2.80 |
|
HELOANs | 827 |
| 1,030 |
| | 2.42 |
| 2.82 |
|
Total | $ | 15,735 |
| $ | 17,924 |
| | 1.72 | % | 2.00 | % |
| |
(a) | These HELOCs are predominantly revolvingthat have been converted to term loans for a 10-year period, after which time the HELOC converts to a loan with a 20-year amortization period, but also include HELOCs that allow interest-only payments beyond the revolving period. |
| |
(b) | The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by closing or reducing the undrawn line to the extent permitted by law when borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. |
HELOCs beyond the revolving period and HELOANs have higher delinquency rates than HELOCsthose that are still within the revolving period. That is primarily because the fully-amortizing payment that is generally required for those products is higher than the minimum payment options available for HELOCsrevolving loans within the revolving period. The higher delinquency rates associated with amortizing HELOCs and HELOANs are factored into the Firm’s allowance for loan losses.
Nonaccrual loans and other credit quality indicators
Impaired loans
The following table below sets forthprovides information about the Firm’s on nonaccrual and other credit quality indicators for retained residential real estate impaired loans, excluding PCI loans. These loans are considered to be impaired as they have been modified in a TDR. All impaired loans are evaluated for an asset-specific allowance as described in Note 13 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Residential mortgage | | Home equity | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Impaired loans | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance | $ | 2,958 |
| $ | 3,381 |
| | $ | 1,062 |
| $ | 1,142 |
| | $ | 4,020 |
| $ | 4,523 |
|
Without an allowance(a) | 1,160 |
| 1,184 |
| | 899 |
| 870 |
| | 2,059 |
| 2,054 |
|
Total impaired loans(b)(c) | $ | 4,118 |
| $ | 4,565 |
| | $ | 1,961 |
| $ | 2,012 |
| | $ | 6,079 |
| $ | 6,577 |
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans | $ | 63 |
| $ | 88 |
| | $ | 14 |
| $ | 45 |
| | $ | 77 |
| $ | 133 |
|
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans(d) | 5,578 |
| 6,207 |
| | 3,355 |
| 3,466 |
| | 8,933 |
| 9,673 |
|
Impaired loans on nonaccrual status(e) | 1,376 |
| 1,459 |
| | 981 |
| 955 |
| | 2,357 |
| 2,414 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
(in millions, except weighted-average data) | March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)(c)(d) | $ | 3,730 |
| $ | 2,780 |
| |
90 or more days past due and government guaranteed(e) | 32 |
| 38 |
| |
| | | |
Current estimated LTV ratios(f)(g) | |
|
| |
Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores: | |
|
| |
Equal to or greater than 660 | $ | 31 |
| $ | 31 |
| |
Less than 660 | 28 |
| 38 |
| |
101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores: | |
|
| |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 148 |
| 134 |
| |
Less than 660 | 119 |
| 132 |
| |
80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores: | | | |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 5,310 |
| 5,953 |
| |
Less than 660 | 758 |
| 764 |
| |
Less than 80% and refreshed FICO scores: | |
|
| |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 219,395 |
| 219,469 |
| |
Less than 660 | 14,545 |
| 14,681 |
| |
No FICO/LTV available | 1,962 |
| 2,052 |
| |
U.S. government-guaranteed | 53 |
| 63 |
| |
Total retained loans | $ | 242,349 |
| $ | 243,317 |
| |
| | | |
Weighted average LTV ratio(f)(h) | 54 | % | 55 | % | |
Weighted average FICO(g)(h) | 759 |
| 758 |
| |
| | | |
Geographic region(i) | | | |
California | $ | 81,783 |
| $ | 82,147 |
| |
New York | 32,121 |
| 31,996 |
| |
Illinois | 15,246 |
| 15,587 |
| |
Texas | 14,567 |
| 14,474 |
| |
Florida | 13,755 |
| 13,668 |
| |
Washington | 8,915 |
| 8,990 |
| |
Colorado | 8,437 |
| 8,447 |
| |
New Jersey | 7,736 |
| 7,752 |
| |
Massachusetts | 6,129 |
| 6,210 |
| |
Arizona | 5,129 |
| 5,171 |
| |
All other(j) | 48,531 |
| 48,875 |
| |
Total retained loans | $ | 242,349 |
| $ | 243,317 |
| |
| |
(a) | RepresentsIncludes collateral-dependent residential real estate loans that are charged off to the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell. The Firm reports, in accordance with regulatory guidance, residential real estate loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower (“Chapter 7 loans”) as collateral-dependent nonaccrual TDRs, regardless of their delinquency status. At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, approximately 8% of Chapter 7 residential real estate loans included approximately 12% of residential mortgages and 7% of home equity that were 30 days or more past due.due, respectively. |
| |
(b) | At September 30, 2019, and DecemberMarch 31, 2018, $162020, nonaccrual loans included $970 million and $4.1 billion, respectively, of PCD loans. Prior to the adoption of CECL, nonaccrual loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Ginnie Mae in accordance withexcluded PCI loans as the standardsFirm recognized interest income on each pool of PCI loans as each of the appropriate government agency (i.e., FHA, VA, RHS) are not included in the table above. When such loans perform subsequent to modification in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, they are generally sold back into Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.pools was performing. |
| |
(c) | PredominantlyGenerally, all impairedconsumer nonaccrual loans inhave an allowance. In accordance with regulatory guidance, certain nonaccrual loans that are considered collateral-dependent have been charged off to the table above are infair value of their underlying collateral less costs to sell. If the U.S.value of the underlying collateral has subsequently improved, the related allowance may be negative. |
| |
(d) | RepresentsThe related interest income on nonaccrual loans recorded on a cash basis was $43 million and $42 million for the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30,three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, and December 31, 2018. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors including charge-offs, net deferred loan fees or costs, and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.respectively. |
| |
(e) | These balances are excluded from nonaccrual loans as the loans are guaranteed by U.S government agencies. Typically the principal balance of the loans is insured and interest is guaranteed at a specified reimbursement rate subject to meeting agreed-upon servicing guidelines. At September 30, 2019March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, nonaccrual loans2019, these balances included $1.9 billion$31 million and $2.0 billion,$34 million, respectively, of TDRs for whichloans that are no longer accruing interest based on the borrowersagreed-upon servicing guidelines. For the remaining balance, interest is being accrued at the guaranteed reimbursement rate. There were less than0 loans that were not guaranteed by U.S. government agencies that are 90 or more days past due. Refer to the Loan accounting framework in Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for additional information about loans modified in a TDR that are on nonaccrual status.due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019. |
The following tables present average impaired loans and the related interest income reported by the Firm.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) | Average impaired loans | | Interest income on impaired loans(a) | | Interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis(a) |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Residential mortgage | $ | 4,200 |
| $ | 4,872 |
| | $ | 55 |
| $ | 61 |
| | $ | 17 |
| $ | 19 |
|
Home equity | 1,938 |
| 2,065 |
| | 33 |
| 33 |
| | 21 |
| 21 |
|
Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | $ | 6,138 |
| $ | 6,937 |
| | $ | 88 |
| $ | 94 |
| | $ | 38 |
| $ | 40 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | Average impaired loans | | Interest income on impaired loans(a) | | Interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis(a) |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Residential mortgage | $ | 4,390 |
| $ | 5,242 |
| | $ | 171 |
| $ | 197 |
| | $ | 52 |
| $ | 58 |
|
Home equity | 1,973 |
| 2,092 |
| | 99 |
| 98 |
| | 62 |
| 63 |
|
Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | $ | 6,363 |
| $ | 7,334 |
| | $ | 270 |
| $ | 295 |
| | $ | 114 |
| $ | 121 |
|
| |
(a)(f) | Generally, interest income onRepresents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans modified in TDRs is recognized on a cash basis untildivided by the borrower has madeestimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. |
| |
(g) | Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis. |
| |
(h) | Excludes loans with no FICO and/or LTV data available. |
| |
(i) | The geographic regions presented in the table are ordered based on the magnitude of 6 payments under the new terms, unlesscorresponding loan balances at March 31, 2020. |
| |
(j) | At March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $53 million and $63 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from the loan is deemed to be collateral-dependent.geographic regions presented based upon the government guarantee. |
Loan modifications
Modifications of residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans,where the Firm grants concessions to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty are generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs. The carrying value of new TDRs was $142 million and $150 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. There were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans, have been modified in TDRs.
The following table presents new TDRs reported by the Firm.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Residential mortgage | $ | 50 |
| $ | 67 |
| | $ | 181 |
| $ | 314 |
|
Home equity | 100 |
| 55 |
| | 214 |
| 241 |
|
Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | $ | 150 |
| $ | 122 |
| | $ | 395 |
| $ | 555 |
|
Nature and extent of modifications
The U.S. Treasury’s Making Home AffordableFirm’s proprietary modification programs as well as the Firm’s proprietary modification government programs, including U.S. GSEs, generally provide various concessions to financially troubled borrowers including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term or payment extensions and deferraldelays of principal and/or interest payments that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement.
The following tables provide table provides information about how residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans, were modified under the Firm’s loss mitigation programs described above during the periods presented. These tables exclude This table excludes Chapter 7 loans where the sole concession granted is the discharge of debt.
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | |
Residential mortgage | | Home equity | | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
| | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Number of loans approved for a trial modification | 365 |
| 513 |
| | 854 |
| 586 |
| | 1,219 |
| 1,099 |
| 1,996 |
| 1,942 |
|
Number of loans permanently modified | 307 |
| 719 |
| | 855 |
| 939 |
| | 1,162 |
| 1,658 |
| 1,481 |
| 1,550 |
|
Concession granted:(a) | | | | | | |
Interest rate reduction | 78 | % | 58 | % | | 93 | % | 77 | % | | 89 | % | 69 | % | 79 | % | 78 | % |
Term or payment extension | 94 |
| 83 |
| | 59 |
| 88 |
| | 68 |
| 86 |
| 81 |
| 68 |
|
Principal and/or interest deferred | 21 |
| 30 |
| | 6 |
| 11 |
| | 10 |
| 19 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
|
Principal forgiveness | 7 |
| 9 |
| | 4 |
| 7 |
| | 5 |
| 8 |
| 4 |
| 6 |
|
Other(b) | 53 |
| 36 |
| | 85 |
| 58 |
| | 76 |
| 49 |
| 55 |
| 60 |
|
| | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | |
Residential mortgage | | Home equity | | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
Number of loans approved for a trial modification | 1,603 |
| 1,789 |
| | 1,786 |
| 1,895 |
| | 3,389 |
| 3,684 |
| |
Number of loans permanently modified | 1,178 |
| 2,374 |
| | 2,778 |
| 4,005 |
| | 3,956 |
| 6,379 |
| |
Concession granted:(a) | | | | | | |
Interest rate reduction | 65 | % | 36 | % | | 83 | % | 57 | % | | 78 | % | 49 | % | |
Term or payment extension | 91 |
| 49 |
| | 64 |
| 62 |
| | 72 |
| 57 |
| |
Principal and/or interest deferred | 26 |
| 47 |
| | 7 |
| 22 |
| | 13 |
| 31 |
| |
Principal forgiveness | 6 |
| 7 |
| | 5 |
| 7 |
| | 5 |
| 7 |
| |
Other(b) | 44 |
| 40 |
| | 71 |
| 58 |
| | 63 |
| 52 |
| |
| |
(a) | Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. Concessions offered on trial modifications are generally consistent with those granted on permanent modifications. |
| |
(b) | Includes variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications and forbearancespayment delays that meet the definition of a TDR for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018. Forbearances suspend or reduce monthly payments for a specific period of time to address a temporary hardship.2019. |
Financial effects of modifications and redefaults
The following tables providetable provides information about the financial effects of the various concessions granted in modifications of residential real estate loans, excluding PCI loans under the loss mitigation programs described above and about redefaults of certain loans modified in TDRs for the periods presented. The following tables presenttable presents only the financial effects of permanent modifications and do not include temporary concessions offered through trial modifications. These tablesThis table also excludeexcludes Chapter 7 loans where the sole concession granted is the discharge of debt.
| | Three months ended September 30, (in millions, except weighted-average data) | Residential mortgage | | Home equity | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
(in millions, except weighted-average data) | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – before TDR | 5.68 | % | 6.13 | % | | 5.50 | % | 5.69 | % | | 5.57 | % | 5.89 | % | 5.20 | % | 5.94 | % |
Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – after TDR | 3.99 |
| 4.23 |
| | 3.30 |
| 3.83 |
| | 3.58 |
| 4.01 |
| 3.48 |
| 4.00 |
|
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – before TDR | 21 |
| 22 |
| | 19 |
| 18 |
| | 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 20 |
|
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – after TDR | 39 |
| 39 |
| | 39 |
| 39 |
| | 39 |
| 39 |
| 39 |
| 38 |
|
Charge-offs recognized upon permanent modification | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Principal deferred | 5 |
| 7 |
| | 1 |
| 2 |
| | 6 |
| 9 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
|
Principal forgiven | 1 |
| 3 |
| | 1 |
| 1 |
| | 2 |
| 4 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
|
Balance of loans that redefaulted within one year of permanent modification(a) | $ | 36 |
| $ | 27 |
| | $ | 17 |
| $ | 19 |
| | $ | 53 |
| $ | 46 |
| $ | 70 |
| $ | 56 |
|
| | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions, except weighted-average data) | Residential mortgage | | Home equity | | Total residential real estate – excluding PCI | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – before TDR | 6.08 | % | 5.45 | % | | 5.56 | % | 5.34 | % | | 5.77 | % | 5.39 | % | |
Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – after TDR | 4.36 |
| 3.64 |
| | 3.60 |
| 3.39 |
| | 3.90 |
| 3.49 |
| |
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – before TDR | 21 |
| 24 |
| | 20 |
| 18 |
| | 20 |
| 22 |
| |
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – after TDR | 39 |
| 38 |
| | 40 |
| 39 |
| | 39 |
| 38 |
| |
Charge-offs recognized upon permanent modification | $ | 1 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| $ | 1 |
| |
Principal deferred | 13 |
| 17 |
| | 4 |
| 7 |
| | 17 |
| 24 |
| |
Principal forgiven | 3 |
| 9 |
| | 3 |
| 5 |
| | 6 |
| 14 |
| |
Balance of loans that redefaulted within one year of permanent modification(a) | $ | 87 |
| $ | 69 |
| | $ | 45 |
| $ | 49 |
| | $ | 132 |
| $ | 118 |
| |
| |
(a) | Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted. For residential real estate loans modified in TDRs, payment default is deemed to occur when the loan becomes 2 contractual payments past due. In the event that a modified loan redefaults, it is probable that the loan will ultimatelygenerally be liquidated through foreclosure or another similar type of liquidation transaction. Redefaults of loans modified within the last 12 months may not be representative of ultimate redefault levels. |
At September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, the weighted-average estimated remaining lives of residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans, permanently modified in TDRs were 10 years for residential mortgage and 9 years for home equity. 6 years. The estimated remaining lives of these loans reflect estimated prepayments, both voluntary and involuntary (i.e., foreclosures and other forced liquidations).
Active and suspended foreclosure
At September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm had non-PCI residential real estate loans, excluding those insured by U.S. government agencies, with a carrying value of $546 million$1.1 billion and $653 million,$1.2 billion, respectively, that were not included in REO, but were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure.
Other consumer loansAuto and other
The following table below provides information on delinquency, which is the primary credit quality indicator for retained auto and other consumer loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions, except ratios) | Term Loans by origination year | | Revolving loans | | | |
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | Prior to 2016 | | Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | Total | | Total |
Loan delinquency | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current | $ | 5,354 |
| $ | 17,455 |
| $ | 10,841 |
| $ | 7,478 |
| $ | 4,173 |
| $ | 2,056 |
| | $ | 3,268 |
| $ | 181 |
| $ | 50,806 |
| | $ | 51,005 |
|
30–119 days past due | 47 |
| 134 |
| 124 |
| 100 |
| 90 |
| 70 |
| | 26 |
| 17 |
| 608 |
| | 667 |
|
120 or more days past due | — |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| | 4 |
| 10 |
| 16 |
| | 10 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 5,401 |
| $ | 17,589 |
| $ | 10,965 |
| $ | 7,579 |
| $ | 4,263 |
| $ | 2,127 |
| | $ | 3,298 |
| $ | 208 |
| $ | 51,430 |
| | $ | 51,682 |
|
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans | 0.87 | % | 0.76 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.33 | % | 2.11 | % | 3.34 | % | | 0.91 | % | 12.98 | % | 1.21 | % | | 1.31 | % |
Nonaccrual and other credit quality indicator
The following table provides information on nonaccrual and other credit quality indicator for retained loan classes, including auto and business bankingother consumer loans.
| | (in millions, except ratios) | Auto | | Consumer & Business Banking | | Total other consumer | Total Auto and other |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Loan delinquency | | | | | | |
Current | $ | 60,872 |
| $ | 62,984 |
| | $ | 26,346 |
| $ | 26,249 |
| | $ | 87,218 |
| $ | 89,233 |
| |
30–119 days past due | 534 |
| 589 |
| | 231 |
| 252 |
| | 765 |
| 841 |
| |
120 or more days past due | 4 |
| — |
| | 122 |
| 111 |
| | 126 |
| 111 |
| |
Total retained loans | $ | 61,410 |
| $ | 63,573 |
| | $ | 26,699 |
| $ | 26,612 |
| | $ | 88,109 |
| $ | 90,185 |
| |
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans | 0.88 | % | 0.93 | % | | 1.32 | % | 1.36 | % | | 1.01 | % | 1.06 | % | |
Nonaccrual loans(a) | 112 |
| 128 |
| | 268 |
| 245 |
| | 380 |
| 373 |
| |
Geographic region(b) | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)(c) | | 147 |
| 146 |
|
| | |
Geographic region(d) | | |
California | $ | 8,016 |
| $ | 8,330 |
| | $ | 5,744 |
| $ | 5,520 |
| | $ | 13,760 |
| $ | 13,850 |
| $ | 7,867 |
| $ | 7,795 |
|
Texas | 6,644 |
| 6,531 |
| | 3,042 |
| 2,993 |
| | 9,686 |
| 9,524 |
| 5,485 |
| 5,457 |
|
New York | 3,627 |
| 3,863 |
| | 4,339 |
| 4,381 |
| | 7,966 |
| 8,244 |
| 3,692 |
| 3,706 |
|
Florida | | 3,060 |
| 3,025 |
|
Illinois | 3,438 |
| 3,716 |
| | 1,737 |
| 2,046 |
| | 5,175 |
| 5,762 |
| 2,396 |
| 2,443 |
|
Florida | 3,280 |
| 3,256 |
| | 1,565 |
| 1,502 |
| | 4,845 |
| 4,758 |
| |
New Jersey | | 1,778 |
| 1,798 |
|
Pennsylvania | | 1,662 |
| 1,721 |
|
Ohio | | 1,453 |
| 1,490 |
|
Arizona | 1,990 |
| 2,084 |
| | 1,268 |
| 1,491 |
| | 3,258 |
| 3,575 |
| 1,344 |
| 1,347 |
|
Ohio | 1,900 |
| 1,973 |
| | 1,189 |
| 1,305 |
| | 3,089 |
| 3,278 |
| |
New Jersey | 1,920 |
| 1,981 |
| | 805 |
| 723 |
| | 2,725 |
| 2,704 |
| |
Michigan | 1,279 |
| 1,357 |
| | 1,264 |
| 1,329 |
| | 2,543 |
| 2,686 |
| |
Louisiana | 1,598 |
| 1,587 |
| | 768 |
| 860 |
| | 2,366 |
| 2,447 |
| 1,304 |
| 1,297 |
|
All other | 27,718 |
| 28,895 |
| | 4,978 |
| 4,462 |
| | 32,696 |
| 33,357 |
| 21,389 |
| 21,603 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 61,410 |
| $ | 63,573 |
| | $ | 26,699 |
| $ | 26,612 |
| | $ | 88,109 |
| $ | 90,185 |
| $ | 51,430 |
| $ | 51,682 |
|
Loans by risk ratings(c) | | | | | | |
Noncriticized | $ | 13,823 |
| $ | 15,749 |
| | $ | 18,738 |
| $ | 18,743 |
| | $ | 32,561 |
| $ | 34,492 |
| |
Criticized performing | 394 |
| 273 |
| | 747 |
| 751 |
| | 1,141 |
| 1,024 |
| |
Criticized nonaccrual | — |
| — |
| | 218 |
| 191 |
| | 218 |
| 191 |
| |
| |
(a) | There were 0 loans that were 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019. |
| |
(b) | All nonaccrual auto and other consumer loans generally have an allowance. |
| |
(c) | Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. |
| |
(d) | The geographic regions presented in this table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at September 30, 2019. |
| |
(c) | For risk-rated business banking and auto loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the risk rating of the loan, including whether the loans are considered to be criticized and/or nonaccrual. |
Other consumer impaired loans and loan
modifications
The table below sets forth information about the Firm’s other consumer impaired loans, including risk-rated business banking and auto loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status, and loans that have been modified in TDRs.
|
| | | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
Impaired loans | | | |
With an allowance | $ | 242 |
| | $ | 222 |
|
Without an allowance(a) | 20 |
| | 29 |
|
Total impaired loans(b)(c) | $ | 262 |
| | $ | 251 |
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 63 |
|
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans(d) | 357 |
| | 355 |
|
Impaired loans on nonaccrual status | 240 |
| | 229 |
|
| |
(a) | When discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly all other consumer impaired loans are in the U.S. |
| |
(c) | Other consumer average impaired loans were $254 million and $271 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $248 million and $281 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The related interest income on impaired loans, including those on a cash basis, was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. |
| |
(d) | Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2019, and DecemberMarch 31, 2018. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs, interest payments received and applied to the principal balance, net deferred loan fees or costs, and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.2020. |
Loan modifications
Certain other consumer loan modifications are considered to be TDRs as they provide various concessions to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty. All of these TDRsLoans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are reported as impaired loans. Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on other consumer loans modified innot considered concessions are not TDRs.
At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, other consumer loans modified in TDRs were $77 million and $79 million, respectively. The impact of these modifications, as well as new TDRs, were not material to the Firm for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018. 2019. Additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose loans have been modified in TDRs as of September 30, 2019 March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018 2019 were not material. TDRs on nonaccrual status were $55 million and $57 million at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Purchased credit-impaired loans
Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of PCI loans, including the related accounting policies.
Residential real estate – PCI loans
The table below sets forth information about the Firm’s consumer, excluding credit card, PCI loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Home equity |
| Prime mortgage |
| Subprime mortgage |
| Option ARMs |
| Total PCI |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
| Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
| Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
| Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
| Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Carrying value(a) | $ | 7,753 |
| $ | 8,963 |
|
| $ | 4,164 |
| $ | 4,690 |
|
| $ | 1,797 |
| $ | 1,945 |
|
| $ | 7,576 |
| $ | 8,436 |
|
| $ | 21,290 |
| $ | 24,034 |
|
Loan delinquency (based on unpaid principal balance) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current | $ | 7,543 |
| $ | 8,624 |
|
| $ | 3,759 |
| $ | 4,226 |
|
| $ | 1,915 |
| $ | 2,033 |
|
| $ | 6,876 |
| $ | 7,592 |
|
| $ | 20,093 |
| $ | 22,475 |
|
30–149 days past due | 234 |
| 278 |
|
| 241 |
| 259 |
|
| 247 |
| 286 |
|
| 362 |
| 398 |
|
| 1,084 |
| 1,221 |
|
150 or more days past due | 165 |
| 242 |
|
| 183 |
| 223 |
|
| 99 |
| 123 |
|
| 350 |
| 457 |
|
| 797 |
| 1,045 |
|
Total loans | $ | 7,942 |
| $ | 9,144 |
|
| $ | 4,183 |
| $ | 4,708 |
|
| $ | 2,261 |
| $ | 2,442 |
|
| $ | 7,588 |
| $ | 8,447 |
|
| $ | 21,974 |
| $ | 24,741 |
|
% of 30+ days past due to total loans | 5.02 | % | 5.69 | % |
| 10.14 | % | 10.24 | % |
| 15.30 | % | 16.75 | % |
| 9.38 | % | 10.12 | % |
| 8.56 | % | 9.16 | % |
Current estimated LTV ratios (based on unpaid principal balance)(b)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | $ | 13 |
| $ | 17 |
|
| $ | 2 |
| $ | 1 |
|
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 3 |
| $ | 3 |
|
| $ | 18 |
| $ | 21 |
|
Less than 660 | 10 |
| 13 |
|
| 6 |
| 7 |
|
| 7 |
| 9 |
|
| 5 |
| 7 |
|
| 28 |
| 36 |
|
101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | 96 |
| 135 |
|
| 6 |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
| 4 |
|
| 18 |
| 17 |
|
| 127 |
| 162 |
|
Less than 660 | 46 |
| 65 |
|
| 19 |
| 22 |
|
| 24 |
| 35 |
|
| 18 |
| 33 |
|
| 107 |
| 155 |
|
80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | 643 |
| 805 |
|
| 58 |
| 75 |
|
| 52 |
| 54 |
|
| 102 |
| 119 |
|
| 855 |
| 1,053 |
|
Less than 660 | 271 |
| 388 |
|
| 71 |
| 112 |
|
| 109 |
| 161 |
|
| 128 |
| 190 |
|
| 579 |
| 851 |
|
Lower than 80% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 | 5,031 |
| 5,548 |
|
| 2,559 |
| 2,689 |
|
| 809 |
| 739 |
|
| 4,932 |
| 5,111 |
|
| 13,331 |
| 14,087 |
|
Less than 660 | 1,613 |
| 1,908 |
|
| 1,283 |
| 1,568 |
|
| 1,155 |
| 1,327 |
|
| 2,093 |
| 2,622 |
|
| 6,144 |
| 7,425 |
|
No FICO/LTV available | 219 |
| 265 |
|
| 179 |
| 228 |
|
| 98 |
| 113 |
|
| 289 |
| 345 |
|
| 785 |
| 951 |
|
Total unpaid principal balance | $ | 7,942 |
| $ | 9,144 |
|
| $ | 4,183 |
| $ | 4,708 |
|
| $ | 2,261 |
| $ | 2,442 |
|
| $ | 7,588 |
| $ | 8,447 |
|
| $ | 21,974 |
| $ | 24,741 |
|
Geographic region (based on unpaid principal balance)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California | $ | 4,704 |
| $ | 5,420 |
|
| $ | 2,280 |
| $ | 2,578 |
|
| $ | 549 |
| $ | 593 |
|
| $ | 4,355 |
| $ | 4,798 |
|
| $ | 11,888 |
| $ | 13,389 |
|
Florida | 865 |
| 976 |
|
| 295 |
| 332 |
|
| 218 |
| 234 |
|
| 630 |
| 713 |
|
| 2,008 |
| 2,255 |
|
New York | 469 |
| 525 |
|
| 338 |
| 365 |
|
| 249 |
| 268 |
|
| 452 |
| 502 |
|
| 1,508 |
| 1,660 |
|
Illinois | 207 |
| 233 |
| | 139 |
| 154 |
| | 115 |
| 123 |
| | 181 |
| 199 |
| | 642 |
| 709 |
|
Washington | 348 |
| 419 |
|
| 85 |
| 98 |
|
| 38 |
| 44 |
|
| 155 |
| 177 |
|
| 626 |
| 738 |
|
New Jersey | 184 |
| 210 |
|
| 117 |
| 134 |
|
| 81 |
| 88 |
|
| 222 |
| 258 |
|
| 604 |
| 690 |
|
Massachusetts | 56 |
| 65 |
|
| 103 |
| 113 |
|
| 69 |
| 73 |
|
| 216 |
| 240 |
|
| 444 |
| 491 |
|
Maryland | 43 |
| 48 |
|
| 89 |
| 95 |
|
| 90 |
| 96 |
|
| 160 |
| 178 |
|
| 382 |
| 417 |
|
Virginia | 47 |
| 54 |
|
| 82 |
| 91 |
|
| 35 |
| 37 |
|
| 190 |
| 211 |
|
| 354 |
| 393 |
|
Arizona | 138 |
| 165 |
|
| 60 |
| 69 |
|
| 39 |
| 43 |
|
| 99 |
| 112 |
|
| 336 |
| 389 |
|
All other | 881 |
| 1,029 |
|
| 595 |
| 679 |
|
| 778 |
| 843 |
|
| 928 |
| 1,059 |
|
| 3,182 |
| 3,610 |
|
Total unpaid principal balance | $ | 7,942 |
| $ | 9,144 |
|
| $ | 4,183 |
| $ | 4,708 |
|
| $ | 2,261 |
| $ | 2,442 |
|
| $ | 7,588 |
| $ | 8,447 |
|
| $ | 21,974 |
| $ | 24,741 |
|
| |
(a) | Carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition. |
| |
(b) | Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. |
| |
(c) | Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis. |
| |
(d) | The geographic regions presented in the table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at September 30, 2019. |
Approximately 26% of the PCI home equity portfolio are senior lien loans; the remaining balance are junior lien HELOANs or HELOCs.The following table represents the Firm’s delinquency statistics for PCI junior lien home equity loans and lines of credit based on the unpaid principal balance as of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total loans | | Total 30+ day delinquency rate |
(in millions, except ratios) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
|
HELOCs(a)(b) | 5,623 |
| 6,531 |
| | 3.66 | % | 4.00 | % |
HELOANs | 234 |
| 280 |
| | 2.99 |
| 3.57 |
|
Total | $ | 5,857 |
| $ | 6,811 |
| | 3.64 | % | 3.98 | % |
| |
(a) | In general, these HELOCs are revolving loans for a 10-year period, after which time the HELOC converts to an interest-only loan with a balloon payment at the end of the loan’s term. Substantially all HELOCs are beyond the revolving period. |
| |
(b) | Includes loans modified into fixed rate amortizing loans. |
The table below presents the accretable yield activity for the Firm’s PCI consumer loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, and represents the Firm’s estimate of gross interest income expected to be earned over the remaining life of the PCI loan portfolios. The table excludes the cost to fund the PCI portfolios, and therefore the accretable yield does not represent net interest income expected to be earned on these portfolios.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total PCI |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
2019 | 2018 | | 2019 | 2018 |
Beginning balance | $ | 7,699 |
| $ | 8,722 |
| | $ | 8,422 |
| $ | 11,159 |
|
Accretion into interest income | (272 | ) | (303 | ) | | (841 | ) | (958 | ) |
Changes in interest rates on variable-rate loans | (308 | ) | 37 |
| | (402 | ) | (231 | ) |
Other changes in expected cash flows(a) | 255 |
| 46 |
| | 195 |
| (1,468 | ) |
Balance at September 30 | $ | 7,374 |
| $ | 8,502 |
| | $ | 7,374 |
| $ | 8,502 |
|
Accretable yield percentage | 5.27 | % | 4.95 | % | | 5.32 | % | 4.88 | % |
| |
(a) | Other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the Firm continues to refine its cash flow model, for example cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of modifications and changes in prepayment assumptions. |
Active and suspended foreclosure
At September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Firm had PCI residential real estate loans with an unpaid principal balance of $776 million and $964 million, respectively, that were not included in REO, but were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure.
Credit card loan portfolio
ReferThe credit card portfolio segment includes credit card loans originated and purchased by the Firm. Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for credit card loans as they provide an early warning that borrowers may be experiencing difficulties (30 days past due); information on those borrowers that have been delinquent for a longer period of time (90 days past due) is also considered. In addition to Note 12delinquency rates, the geographic distribution of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-Kthe loans provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio based on the regional economy.
While the borrower’s credit score is another general indicator of credit quality, the Firm does not view credit scores as a primary indicator of credit quality because the borrower’s credit score tends to be a lagging indicator. The
distribution of such scores provides a general indicator of credit quality trends within the portfolio; however, the score does not capture all factors that would be predictive of future credit performance. Refreshed FICO score information, which is obtained at least quarterly, for further information ona statistically significant random sample of the credit card loan portfolio includingis indicated in the following table. FICO is considered to be the industry benchmark for credit scores.
The Firm generally originates new card accounts to prime consumer borrowers. However, certain cardholders’ FICO scores may decrease over time, depending on the performance of the cardholder and changes in the credit score calculation.
The following table provides information on delinquency, which is the primary credit quality indicators.
The table below sets forth information about the Firm’s indicator for retained credit card loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
|
Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | Total | | Total |
Loan delinquency | | | | | |
Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing | $ | 149,689 |
| $ | 1,314 |
| $ | 151,003 |
| | $ | 165,767 |
|
30–89 days past due and still accruing | 1,325 |
| 126 |
| 1,451 |
| | 1,550 |
|
90 or more days past due and still accruing | 1,502 |
| 65 |
| 1,567 |
| | 1,607 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 152,516 |
| $ | 1,505 |
| $ | 154,021 |
| | $ | 168,924 |
|
Loan delinquency ratios | | | | | |
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans | 1.85 | % | 12.69 | % | 1.96 | % | | 1.87 | % |
% of 90+ days past due to total retained loans | 0.98 |
| 4.32 |
| 1.02 |
| | 0.95 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
|
Loan delinquency | | |
Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing | $ | 156,629 |
| $ | 153,746 |
|
30–89 days past due and still accruing | 1,500 |
| 1,426 |
|
90 or more days past due and still accruing | 1,442 |
| 1,444 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 159,571 |
| $ | 156,616 |
|
Loan delinquency ratios | | |
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans | 1.84 | % | 1.83 | % |
% of 90+ days past due to total retained loans | 0.90 |
| 0.92 |
|
Geographic region(a) | | |
California | $ | 24,313 |
| $ | 23,757 |
|
Texas | 15,790 |
| 15,085 |
|
New York | 13,940 |
| 13,601 |
|
Florida | 10,101 |
| 9,770 |
|
Illinois | 9,125 |
| 8,938 |
|
New Jersey | 6,821 |
| 6,739 |
|
Ohio | 5,093 |
| 5,094 |
|
Pennsylvania | 4,918 |
| 4,996 |
|
Colorado | 4,543 |
| 4,309 |
|
Michigan | 3,942 |
| 3,912 |
|
All other | 60,985 |
| 60,415 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 159,571 |
| $ | 156,616 |
|
Percentage of portfolio based on carrying value with estimated refreshed FICO scores | | |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 83.6 | % | 84.2 | % |
Less than 660 | 15.6 |
| 15.0 |
|
No FICO available | 0.8 |
| 0.8 |
|
Other credit quality indicatorsThe following table provides information on other credit quality indicators for retained credit card loans.
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Geographic region(a) | | |
California | $ | 23,199 |
| $ | 25,783 |
|
Texas | 15,517 |
| 16,728 |
|
New York | 13,264 |
| 14,544 |
|
Florida | 10,146 |
| 10,830 |
|
Illinois | 8,607 |
| 9,579 |
|
New Jersey | 6,424 |
| 7,165 |
|
Ohio | 4,874 |
| 5,406 |
|
Pennsylvania | 4,709 |
| 5,245 |
|
Colorado | 4,304 |
| 4,763 |
|
Michigan | 3,788 |
| 4,164 |
|
All other | 59,189 |
| 64,717 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 154,021 |
| $ | 168,924 |
|
Percentage of portfolio based on carrying value with estimated refreshed FICO scores | | |
Equal to or greater than 660 | 82.3 | % | 84.0 | % |
Less than 660 | 16.6 |
| 15.4 |
|
No FICO available | 1.1 |
| 0.6 |
|
| |
(a) | The geographic regions presented in the table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at September 30, 2019. |
Credit card impaired loans and loan modifications
Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of impaired credit card loans, including credit card loan modifications.
The table below sets forth information about the Firm’s impaired credit card loans. All of these loans are considered to be impaired as they have been modified in TDRs.
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
|
Impaired credit card loans with an allowance(a)(b)(c) | $ | 1,423 |
| $ | 1,319 |
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired credit card loans | 488 |
| 440 |
|
| |
(a) | The carrying value and the unpaid principal balance are the same for credit card impaired loans. |
| |
(b) | There were no impaired loans without an allowance. |
| |
(c) | Predominantly all impaired credit card loans are in the U.S.March 31, 2020. |
The following table presents average balances of impaired credit card loans and interest income recognized on those loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Average impaired credit card loans | $ | 1,406 |
| $ | 1,267 |
| | $ | 1,371 |
| $ | 1,245 |
|
Interest income on impaired credit card loans | 18 |
| 17 |
| | 53 |
| 48 |
|
Loan modifications
The Firm may offer one of a number of loan modification programs granting concessions to credit card borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty. MostThe Firm grants concessions for most of the credit card loans have been modified under long-term programs for borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties.programs. These modifications involve placing the customer on a fixed payment plan, generally for 60 months, and typically include reducing the interest rate on the credit card. Substantially all modifications under the Firm’s long-term programs are considered to be TDRs. New enrollments in these loan modification programs were $242 million and $215 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $717 million and $640 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For all periods disclosed, new enrollments were less than 1% of total retained credit card loans.
Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for additional information about credit card loan modifications.Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs.
Financial effects of modifications and redefaults
The following table provides information about the financial effects of the concessions granted on credit card loans modified in TDRs and redefaults for the periods presented. For all periods disclosed, new enrollments were less than 1% of total retained credit card loans.
| | (in millions, except weighted-average data) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| |
Balance of new TDRs(a) | | $ | 277 |
| $ | 249 |
| |
Weighted-average interest rate of loans – before TDR | 19.18 | % | 18.25 | % | | 19.23 | % | 17.82 | % | 18.82 | % | 19.13 | % | |
Weighted-average interest rate of loans – after TDR | 4.65 |
| 5.10 |
| | 4.80 |
| 5.12 |
| 4.02 |
| 5.03 |
| |
Loans that redefaulted within one year of modification(a) | $ | 42 |
| $ | 31 |
| | $ | 108 |
| $ | 82 |
| |
Balance of loans that redefaulted within one year of modification(b) | | $ | 36 |
| $ | 34 |
| |
| |
(a) | Represents the outstanding balance prior to modification. |
| |
(b) | Represents loans modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The amounts presented represent the balance of such loans as of the end of the quarter in which they defaulted. |
For credit card loans modified in TDRs, payment default is deemed to have occurred when the borrower misses two2 consecutive contractual payments. A substantial portion of these loans are expected to be charged-offcharged off in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. Based on historical experience, the estimated weighted-average default rate for modified credit card loans was expected to be 34.30%35.15% and 33.38%32.89% as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively.
Wholesale loan portfolio
Wholesale loans include loans made to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals.
The primary credit quality indicator for wholesale loans is the internal risk rating assigned to each loan. Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of loans and differentiate risk within the portfolio. Risk ratings on loans consider the PD and the LGD. The PD is the likelihood that a loan will default. The LGD is the estimated loss on the loan that would be realized upon the default of the borrower and takes into consideration collateral and structural support for each credit facility.
Management considers several factors to determine an appropriate internal risk rating, including the obligor’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources for repayment, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry and geography in which the obligor operates. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., PDs and LGDs) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. The Firm considers internal ratings equivalent to BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade, and these ratings have a lower PD and/or lower LGD than non-investment grade ratings.
Noninvestment-grade ratings are further classified as noncriticized and criticized, and the criticized portion is further subdivided into performing and nonaccrual loans, representing management’s assessment of the collectibility of principal and interest. Criticized loans have a higher PD than noncriticized loans. The Firm’s definition of criticized aligns with the U.S. banking regulatory definition of criticized exposures, which consist of special mention, substandard and doubtful categories.
each loan.Risk ratings are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information affecting the obligor’s ability to fulfill its obligations.
As noted above, the risk rating of a loan considers the industry in which the obligor conducts its operations. As part of the overall credit risk management framework, the Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry and client exposures, with particular attention paid to industries with actual or potential credit concern. Refer to Note 12 and Note 13 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K4 for further informationdetail on these risk ratings.industry concentrations.
The table below providesfollowing tables provide information by class of receivableon internal risk rating, which is the primary credit quality indicator for the retained loans in the Wholesale portfolio segment.wholesale loans.
| | | Commercial and industrial | | Real estate | | Financial institutions | Governments & Agencies | | Other(d) | Total retained loans | Secured by real estate | | Commercial and industrial | | Other | | Total retained loans |
(in millions, except ratios) | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 |
Loans by risk ratings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | 61,709 |
| $ | 73,497 |
| | $ | 101,379 |
| $ | 100,107 |
| | $ | 39,492 |
| $ | 32,178 |
| $ | 12,905 |
| $ | 13,984 |
| | $ | 121,813 |
| $ | 119,963 |
| $ | 337,298 |
| $ | 339,729 |
| $ | 96,786 |
| $ | 96,611 |
| | $ | 106,902 |
| $ | 80,489 |
| | $ | 203,635 |
| $ | 186,344 |
| | $ | 407,323 |
| $ | 363,444 |
|
Noninvestment-grade: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noncriticized | 52,484 |
| 51,720 |
| | 13,574 |
| 14,876 |
| | 16,123 |
| 15,316 |
| 206 |
| 201 |
| | 11,059 |
| 11,478 |
| 93,446 |
| 93,591 |
| 23,334 |
| 22,493 |
| | 80,210 |
| 60,437 |
| | 31,231 |
| 27,591 |
| | 134,775 |
| 110,521 |
|
Criticized performing | 3,743 |
| 3,738 |
| | 808 |
| 620 |
| | 202 |
| 150 |
| — |
| 2 |
| | 540 |
| 182 |
| 5,293 |
| 4,692 |
| 1,339 |
| 1,131 |
| | 8,459 |
| 4,399 |
| | 1,436 |
| 1,126 |
| | 11,234 |
| 6,656 |
|
Criticized nonaccrual | 1,291 |
| 851 |
| | 65 |
| 134 |
| | 22 |
| 4 |
| — |
| — |
| | 92 |
| 161 |
| 1,470 |
| 1,150 |
| 254 |
| 183 |
| | 1,278 |
| 844 |
| | 425 |
| 30 |
| | 1,957 |
| 1,057 |
|
Total noninvestment- grade | 57,518 |
| 56,309 |
| | 14,447 |
| 15,630 |
| | 16,347 |
| 15,470 |
| 206 |
| 203 |
| | 11,691 |
| 11,821 |
| 100,209 |
| 99,433 |
| 24,927 |
| 23,807 |
| | 89,947 |
| 65,680 |
| | $ | 33,092 |
| 28,747 |
| | 147,966 |
| 118,234 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 119,227 |
| $ | 129,806 |
| | $ | 115,826 |
| $ | 115,737 |
| | $ | 55,839 |
| $ | 47,648 |
| $ | 13,111 |
| $ | 14,187 |
| | $ | 133,504 |
| $ | 131,784 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| $ | 121,713 |
| $ | 120,418 |
| | $ | 196,849 |
| $ | 146,169 |
| | $ | 236,727 |
| $ | 215,091 |
| | $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 481,678 |
|
% of total criticized exposure to total retained loans | 4.22 | % | 3.54 | % | | 0.75 | % | 0.65 | % | | 0.40 | % | 0.32 | % | — | % | 0.01 | % | | 0.47 | % | 0.26 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.33 | % | |
% of investment-grade to total retained loans
| | 79.52 | % | 80.23 | % | | 54.31 | % | 55.07 | % | | 86.02 | % | 86.63 | % | | 73.35 | % | 75.45 | % |
% of total criticized to total retained loans | | 1.31 |
| 1.09 |
| | 4.95 |
| 3.59 |
| | 0.79 |
| 0.54 |
| | 2.38 |
| 1.60 |
|
% of criticized nonaccrual to total retained loans | 1.08 |
| 0.66 |
| | 0.06 |
| 0.12 |
| | 0.04 |
| 0.01 |
| — |
| — |
| | 0.07 |
| 0.12 |
| 0.34 |
| 0.26 |
| 0.21 |
| 0.15 |
| | 0.65 |
| 0.58 |
| | 0.18 |
| 0.01 |
| | 0.35 |
| 0.22 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Loans by geographic distribution(a) | | | | | | | | |
Total non-U.S. | $ | 28,850 |
| $ | 29,572 |
| | $ | 3,202 |
| $ | 2,967 |
| | $ | 17,112 |
| $ | 18,524 |
| $ | 2,699 |
| $ | 3,150 |
| | $ | 48,394 |
| $ | 48,433 |
| $ | 100,257 |
| $ | 102,646 |
| |
Total U.S. | 90,377 |
| 100,234 |
| | 112,624 |
| 112,770 |
| | 38,727 |
| 29,124 |
| 10,412 |
| 11,037 |
| | 85,110 |
| 83,351 |
| 337,250 |
| 336,516 |
| |
Total retained loans | $ | 119,227 |
| $ | 129,806 |
| | $ | 115,826 |
| $ | 115,737 |
| | $ | 55,839 |
| $ | 47,648 |
| $ | 13,111 |
| $ | 14,187 |
| | $ | 133,504 |
| $ | 131,784 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loan delinquency(b) | | | | | | | | |
Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing | $ | 117,621 |
| $ | 128,678 |
| | $ | 115,733 |
| $ | 115,533 |
| | $ | 55,764 |
| $ | 47,622 |
| $ | 13,097 |
| $ | 14,165 |
| | $ | 132,844 |
| $ | 130,918 |
| $ | 435,059 |
| $ | 436,916 |
| |
30–89 days past due and still accruing | 279 |
| 109 |
| | 22 |
| 67 |
| | 51 |
| 12 |
| 13 |
| 18 |
| | 568 |
| 702 |
| 933 |
| 908 |
| |
90 or more days past due and still accruing(c) | 36 |
| 168 |
| | 6 |
| 3 |
| | 2 |
| 10 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| | — |
| 3 |
| 45 |
| 188 |
| |
Criticized nonaccrual | 1,291 |
| 851 |
| | 65 |
| 134 |
| | 22 |
| 4 |
| — |
| — |
| | 92 |
| 161 |
| 1,470 |
| 1,150 |
| |
Total retained loans | $ | 119,227 |
| $ | 129,806 |
| | $ | 115,826 |
| $ | 115,737 |
| | $ | 55,839 |
| $ | 47,648 |
| $ | 13,111 |
| $ | 14,187 |
| | $ | 133,504 |
| $ | 131,784 |
| $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 439,162 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Secured by real estate | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
Term loans by origination year | | Revolving loans | | | | |
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | Prior to 2016 | | Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | | Total | | Total |
Loans by risk ratings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | 5,211 |
| $ | 21,611 |
| $ | 15,099 |
| $ | 14,485 |
| $ | 16,839 |
| $ | 22,148 |
| | $ | 1,392 |
| $ | 1 |
| | $ | 96,786 |
| | $ | 96,611 |
|
Noninvestment-grade | 659 |
| 2,944 |
| 3,498 |
| 2,492 |
| 2,611 |
| 12,030 |
| | 692 |
| 1 |
| | 24,927 |
| | 23,807 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 5,870 |
| $ | 24,555 |
| $ | 18,597 |
| $ | 16,977 |
| $ | 19,450 |
| $ | 34,178 |
| | $ | 2,084 |
| $ | 2 |
| | $ | 121,713 |
| | $ | 120,418 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial and industrial | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
Term loans by origination year | | Revolving loans | | | | |
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | Prior to 2016 | | Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | | Total | | Total |
Loans by risk ratings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | 10,837 |
| $ | 11,781 |
| $ | 5,349 |
| $ | 4,054 |
| $ | 1,435 |
| $ | 1,662 |
| | $ | 71,780 |
| $ | 4 |
| | $ | 106,902 |
| | $ | 80,489 |
|
Noninvestment-grade | 6,192 |
| 11,346 |
| 6,785 |
| 2,998 |
| 970 |
| 3,079 |
| | 58,486 |
| 91 |
| | 89,947 |
| | 65,680 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 17,029 |
| $ | 23,127 |
| $ | 12,134 |
| $ | 7,052 |
| $ | 2,405 |
| $ | 4,741 |
| | $ | 130,266 |
| $ | 95 |
| | $ | 196,849 |
| | $ | 146,169 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other(a) | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
Term loans by origination year | | Revolving loans | | | | |
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | Prior to 2016 | | Within the revolving period | Converted to term loans | | Total | | Total |
Loans by risk ratings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment-grade | $ | 11,434 |
| $ | 14,841 |
| $ | 10,247 |
| $ | 7,719 |
| $ | 4,660 |
| $ | 14,835 |
| | $ | 139,618 |
| $ | 281 |
| | $ | 203,635 |
| | $ | 186,344 |
|
Noninvestment-grade | 2,692 |
| 3,346 |
| 2,447 |
| 743 |
| 180 |
| 686 |
| | 22,958 |
| 40 |
| | 33,092 |
| | 28,747 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 14,126 |
| $ | 18,187 |
| $ | 12,694 |
| $ | 8,462 |
| $ | 4,840 |
| $ | 15,521 |
| | $ | 162,576 |
| $ | 321 |
| | $ | 236,727 |
| | $ | 215,091 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes loans to financial institutions, states and political subdivisions, SPEs, nonprofits, personal investment companies and trusts, as well as loans to individuals and individual entities (predominantly Wealth Management clients within AWM). Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 Form 10-K for more information on SPEs. |
The following table presents additional information on retained loans secured by real estate, which consists of loans secured wholly or substantially by a lien or liens on real property at origination.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Multifamily | | Other commercial | | Total retained loans secured by real estate |
Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Retained loans secured by real estate | $ | 74,494 |
| $ | 73,840 |
| | $ | 47,219 |
| $ | 46,578 |
| | $ | 121,713 |
| $ | 120,418 |
|
Criticized | 342 |
| 340 |
| | 1,251 |
| 974 |
| | 1,593 |
| 1,314 |
|
% of total criticized to total retained loans secured by real estate | 0.46 | % | 0.46 | % | | 2.65 | % | 2.09 | % | | 1.31 | % | 1.09 | % |
Criticized nonaccrual | $ | 28 |
| $ | 28 |
| | $ | 226 |
| $ | 155 |
| | $ | 254 |
| $ | 183 |
|
% of criticized nonaccrual loans to total retained loans secured by real estate | 0.04 | % | 0.04 | % | | 0.48 | % | 0.33 | % | | 0.21 | % | 0.15 | % |
Geographic distribution and delinquency
The following table provides information on the geographic distribution and delinquency for retained wholesale loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Secured by real estate | | Commercial and industrial | | Other | | Total retained loans |
(in millions, except ratios) | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 |
Loans by geographic distribution(a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-U.S. | $ | 2,466 |
| $ | 2,582 |
| | $ | 44,606 |
| $ | 34,215 |
| | $ | 67,738 |
| $ | 64,579 |
| | $ | 114,810 |
| $ | 101,376 |
|
Total U.S. | 119,247 |
| 117,836 |
| | 152,243 |
| 111,954 |
| | 168,989 |
| 150,512 |
| | 440,479 |
| 380,302 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 121,713 |
| $ | 120,418 |
| | $ | 196,849 |
| $ | 146,169 |
| | $ | 236,727 |
| $ | 215,091 |
| | $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 481,678 |
|
Loan delinquency(b) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing | $ | 121,173 |
| $ | 120,119 |
| | $ | 195,210 |
| $ | 144,839 |
| | $ | 235,741 |
| $ | 214,641 |
| | $ | 552,124 |
| $ | 479,599 |
|
30–89 days past due and still accruing | 286 |
| 115 |
| | 329 |
| 449 |
| | 538 |
| 415 |
| | 1,153 |
| 979 |
|
90 or more days past due and still accruing(c) | — |
| 1 |
| | 32 |
| 37 |
| | 23 |
| 5 |
| | 55 |
| 43 |
|
Criticized nonaccrual | 254 |
| 183 |
| | 1,278 |
| 844 |
| | 425 |
| 30 |
| | 1,957 |
| 1,057 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 121,713 |
| $ | 120,418 |
| | $ | 196,849 |
| $ | 146,169 |
| | $ | 236,727 |
| $ | 215,091 |
| | $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 481,678 |
|
| |
(a) | The U.S. and non-U.S. distribution is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower. |
| |
(b) | The credit quality of wholesale loans is assessed primarily through ongoing review and monitoring of an obligor’s ability to meet contractual obligations rather than relying on the past due status, which is generally a lagging indicator of credit quality. Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a further discussion. |
| |
(c) | Represents loans that are considered well-collateralized and therefore still accruing interest. |
| |
(d) | Other includes individuals and individual entities (predominantly consists of Wealth Management clients within AWM and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts), SPEs and Private education and civic organizations. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for more information on SPEs. |
Nonaccrual loans
The following table presents additionalprovides information on the real estate class of loans within the Wholesale portfolio for the periods indicated. Refer to Note 12 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for further information on real estateretained wholesale nonaccrual loans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Multifamily | | Other commercial | | Total real estate loans |
Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
Real estate retained loans | $ | 79,169 |
| $ | 79,184 |
| | $ | 36,657 |
| $ | 36,553 |
| | $ | 115,826 |
| $ | 115,737 |
|
Criticized exposure | 533 |
| 388 |
| | 340 |
| 366 |
| | 873 |
| 754 |
|
% of total criticized exposure to total real estate retained loans | 0.67 | % | 0.49 | % | | 0.93 | % | 1.00 | % | | 0.75 | % | 0.65 | % |
Criticized nonaccrual | $ | 34 |
| $ | 57 |
| | $ | 31 |
| $ | 77 |
| | $ | 65 |
| $ | 134 |
|
% of criticized nonaccrual loans to total real estate retained loans | 0.04 | % | 0.07 | % | | 0.08 | % | 0.21 | % | | 0.06 | % | 0.12 | % |
Wholesale impaired retained loans and loan modifications
Wholesale impaired retained loans consist of loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and/or that have been modified in a TDR. All impaired loans are evaluated for an asset-specific allowance as described in Note 13 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K.
The table below sets forth information about the Firm’s wholesale impaired retained loans. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Commercial and industrial | | Real estate | | Financial institutions | | Governments & Agencies | | Other | | Total retained loans | |
Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | | Sep 30, 2019 | | Dec 31, 2018 | |
Impaired loans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance | $ | 1,068 |
| $ | 807 |
| | $ | 46 |
| $ | 107 |
| | $ | 22 |
| $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 96 |
| $ | 152 |
| | $ | 1,232 |
| | $ | 1,070 |
| |
Without an allowance(a) | 279 |
| 140 |
| | 21 |
| 27 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 4 |
| 13 |
| | 304 |
| | 180 |
| |
Total impaired loans | $ | 1,347 |
| $ | 947 |
| | $ | 67 |
| $ | 134 |
| | $ | 22 |
| $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 100 |
| $ | 165 |
| | $ | 1,536 |
| (c) | $ | 1,250 |
| (c) |
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans | $ | 320 |
| $ | 252 |
| | $ | 13 |
| $ | 25 |
| | $ | 7 |
| $ | 1 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2 |
| $ | 19 |
| | $ | 342 |
| | $ | 297 |
| |
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans(b) | 1,532 |
| 1,043 |
| | 104 |
| 203 |
| | 23 |
| 4 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 336 |
| 473 |
| | 1,995 |
| | 1,723 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Secured by real estate | | Commercial and industrial | | Other | | Total retained loans |
Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 |
Nonaccrual loans | | | | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance | $ | 232 |
| $ | 169 |
| | $ | 1,157 |
| $ | 688 |
| | $ | 345 |
| $ | 28 |
| | $ | 1,734 |
| $ | 885 |
|
Without an allowance(a) | 22 |
| 14 |
| | 121 |
| 156 |
| | 80 |
| 2 |
| | 223 |
| 172 |
|
Total nonaccrual loans(b) | $ | 254 |
| $ | 183 |
| | $ | 1,278 |
| $ | 844 |
| | $ | 425 |
| $ | 30 |
| | $ | 1,957 |
| $ | 1,057 |
|
| |
(a) | When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment inamortized cost of the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged-offcharged off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance. |
| |
(b) | Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the carrying value; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discount or premiums on purchased loans. |
| |
(c) | Based upon the domicile of the borrower, largely consists of loans in the U.S. |
The following table presents the Firm’s average impaired retained loans for the periods indicated. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Commercial and industrial | $ | 1,073 |
| $ | 838 |
| | $ | 1,082 |
| $ | 1,095 |
|
Real estate | 80 |
| 134 |
| | 105 |
| 138 |
|
Financial institutions | 9 |
| 45 |
| | 11 |
| 76 |
|
Governments & Agencies | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
|
Other | 123 |
| 202 |
| | 207 |
| 214 |
|
Total(a) | $ | 1,285 |
| $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 1,405 |
| $ | 1,523 |
|
| |
(a) | The related interestInterest income on accruing impairednonaccrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis werewas not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. |
Loan modifications
Certain loan modifications are considered to be TDRs as they provide various concessions to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty. All TDRsLoans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are reported as impaired loans in the tables above. TDRs were $498 million and $576 million as of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.not considered concessions are not TDRs. The impact of these modifications, as well as new TDRs, werewas not material to the Firm for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.
2019.
Note 1213 – Allowance for credit losses
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The adoption of this guidance established a single allowance framework for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This framework requires that management’s estimate reflects credit losses over the instrument’s remaining expected life and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. Refer to Note 13 of 1 for further information.
JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-Kallowance for a detailed discussioncredit losses comprises:
the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated) and is presented separately on the balance sheet,
the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is presented on the balance sheet in accounts payable and other liabilities, and
the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which covers the Firm’s HTM and AFS securities and is recognized within Investment Securities on the balance sheet.
The income statement effect of all changes in the allowance for credit losses is recognized in the provision for credit losses.
Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is complex and requires significant judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the CRO, the CFO and the Controller of the Firm. Subsequent evaluations of credit exposures, considering the macroeconomic conditions, forecasts and other factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance for credit losses in future periods.
The Firm’s policies used to determine its allowance for loan losses and its allowance for lending-related commitments are described in the following paragraphs. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the policies used to determine the allowance for credit losses on investment securities.
Methodology for allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments
The allowance for loan losses and allowance for lending-related commitments represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of retained loans and lending-related commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable. The Firm does not record an allowance for future draws on unconditionally cancellable lending-related commitments (e.g., credit cards). Expected losses related accounting policies.to accrued interest on credit card loans are included in the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. However, the Firm does not record an allowance on other accrued interest receivables, due to its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income.
The expected life of each instrument is determined by considering its contractual term, expected prepayments, cancellation features, and certain extension and call options. The expected life of funded credit card loans is generally estimated by considering expected future payments on the
credit card account, and determining how much of those amounts should be allocated to repayments of the funded loan balance (as of the balance sheet date) versus other account activity. This allocation is made using an approach that incorporates the payment application requirements of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, generally paying down the highest interest rate balances first.
The estimate of expected credit losses includes expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off or expected to be charged off, even if such recoveries result in a negative allowance.
Collective and Individual Assessments
When calculating the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments, the Firm assesses whether exposures share similar risk characteristics. If similar risk characteristics exist, the Firm estimates expected credit losses collectively, considering the risk associated with a particular pool and the probability that the exposures within the pool will deteriorate or default.
Relevant risk characteristics for the consumer portfolio include product type, delinquency status, current FICO scores, geographic distribution, and, for collateralized loans, current LTV ratios. Relevant risk characteristics for the wholesale portfolio include LOB, geography, risk rating, delinquency status, level and type of collateral, industry sector, credit enhancement, product type, facility purpose, tenor, and payment terms. The assessment of risk characteristics is subject to significant management judgment. Emphasizing one characteristic over another or considering additional characteristics could affect the allowance.
The majority of the Firm’s credit exposures share risk characteristics with other similar exposures, and as a result are collectively assessed for impairment (“portfolio-based component”). The portfolio-based component covers consumer loans, performing risk-rated loans and certain lending-related commitments.
If an exposure does not share risk characteristics with other exposures, the Firm generally estimates expected credit losses on an individual basis, considering expected repayment and conditions impacting that individual exposure (“asset-specific component”). The asset-specific component covers modified PCD loans, loans modified or reasonably expected to be modified in a TDR, collateral-dependent loans, as well as, risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status.
Portfolio-based component
The portfolio-based component begins with a quantitative calculation that considers the likelihood of the borrower changing delinquency status or moving from one risk rating to another. The quantitative calculation covers expected credit losses over an instrument’s expected life and is estimated by applying credit loss factors to the Firm’s estimated exposure at default.
The credit loss factors incorporate the probability of borrower default as well as loss severity in the event of default. They are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios over an eight-quarter
forecast period, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the eight-quarter forecast period. The eight-quarter forecast incorporates hundreds of macroeconomic variables that are relevant for exposures across the Firm, with modeled credit losses being driven primarily by a subset of less than twenty variables, including U.S. real gross domestic product (“GDP”), U.S. unemployment rates and initial jobless claims, short- and long-term interest rates, U.S. equity prices, corporate credit spreads, housing prices, and oil prices. The specific variables that have the greatest effect on the modeled losses of each portfolio vary by portfolio and geography. The five macroeconomic scenarios consist of a central, relative adverse, extreme adverse, relative upside and extreme upside scenario, and are updated by the Firm’s central forecasting team. The scenarios take into consideration the Firm’s overarching economic outlook, internal perspectives from subject matter experts across the Firm, and market consensus and involve a governed process that incorporates feedback from senior management across LOBs, Corporate Finance and Risk Management.
In light of the rapidly evolving economic conditions and forecasts during March 2020, management updated its macroeconomic forecast near the end of its credit loss estimation process in early April. This macroeconomic forecast was used to generate an updated credit loss estimate that was the primary driver of the Firm’s provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2020. Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods.
The quantitative calculation is adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet reflected in the calculation; these adjustments are accomplished in part by analyzing the historical loss experience, including during stressed periods, for each major product segment. However, it is difficult to predict whether historical loss experience is indicative of future loss levels. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic has stressed many macroeconomic variables to degrees not seen nor experienced in recent history, which creates additional challenges in the use of modeled credit loss estimates.
Management applies significant judgment in making this adjustment, taking into account uncertainties associated with various factors not already considered in the quantitative calculation, including current economic and political conditions, quality of underwriting standards, borrower behavior, credit concentrations or deterioration within an industry, product or portfolio, as well as other relevant internal and external factors affecting the credit quality of the portfolio. In certain instances, the interrelationships between these factors create further uncertainties.
The application of different inputs into the quantitative calculation, and the assumptions used by management to adjust the quantitative calculation, are subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for
loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments.
Asset-specific component
To determine the asset-specific component of the allowance, collateral-dependent loans (including those loans for which foreclosure is probable) and larger, nonaccrual risk-rated loans in the wholesale portfolio segment are generally evaluated individually, while smaller loans (both scored and risk-rated) are aggregated for evaluation using factors relevant for the respective class of assets.
The Firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. Subsequent changes in impairment are generally recognized as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. For collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell is used to determine the charge-off amount for declines in value (to reduce the amortized cost of the loan to the fair value of collateral) or the amount of negative allowance that should be recognized (for recoveries of prior charge-offs associated with improvements in the fair value of collateral).
The asset-specific component of the allowance for loan losses that have been or are expected to be modified in TDRs incorporates the effect of the modification on the loan’s expected cash flows (including forgone interest, principal forgiveness, as well as other concessions), and also the potential for redefault. For residential real estate loans modified in or expected to be modified in TDRs, the Firm develops product-specific probability of default estimates, which are applied at a loan level to compute expected losses. In developing these probabilities of default, the Firm considers the relationship between the credit quality characteristics of the underlying loans and certain assumptions about housing prices and unemployment, based upon industry-wide data. The Firm also considers its own historical loss experience to-date based on actual redefaulted modified loans. For credit card loans modified in or expected to be modified in TDRs, expected losses incorporate projected redefaults based on the Firm’s historical experience by type of modification program. For wholesale loans modified or expected to be modified in TDRs, expected losses incorporate management’s expectation of the borrower’s ability to repay under the modified terms.
Estimating the timing and amounts of future cash flows is highly judgmental as these cash flow projections rely upon estimates such as loss severities, asset valuations, default rates (including redefault rates on modified loans), the amounts and timing of interest or principal payments (including any expected prepayments) or other factors that are reflective of current and expected market conditions. These estimates are, in turn, dependent on factors such as the duration of current overall economic conditions, industry-, portfolio-, or borrower-specific factors, the expected outcome of insolvency proceedings as well as, in certain circumstances, other economic factors. All of these estimates and assumptions require significant management judgment and certain assumptions are highly subjective.
Allowance for credit losses and related information
The table below summarizes information about the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments, and includes a breakdown of loans and lending-related commitments by impairment methodology. Refer to Note 10 for further information on the allowance for credit losses on investment securities.
The adoption of the CECL accounting guidance resulted in a change in the accounting for PCI loans, which are considered PCD loans. In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020(e) | | 2019 |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | | Credit card | | Wholesale | Total | | |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total | | Consumer, excluding credit card | Credit card | Wholesale | Total |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 4,146 |
| $ | 5,184 |
| | $ | 4,115 |
| $ | 13,445 |
| | $ | 4,579 |
| | $ | 4,884 |
| | $ | 4,141 |
| $ | 13,604 |
| | $ | 2,538 |
| $ | 5,683 |
| $ | 4,902 |
| $ | 13,123 |
| | $ | 3,434 |
| $ | 5,184 |
| $ | 4,827 |
| $ | 13,445 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | 297 |
| 5,517 |
| (1,642 | ) | 4,172 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
|
Gross charge-offs | 702 |
| 4,050 |
| | 270 |
| 5,022 |
| | 776 |
| | 3,777 |
| | 264 |
| 4,817 |
| | 233 |
| 1,488 |
| 181 |
| 1,902 |
| | 234 |
| 1,344 |
| 64 |
| 1,642 |
|
Gross recoveries | (420 | ) | (433 | ) | | (34 | ) | (887 | ) | | (681 | ) | | (370 | ) | | (146 | ) | (1,197 | ) | | |
Gross recoveries collected | | (239 | ) | (175 | ) | (19 | ) | (433 | ) | | (127 | ) | (142 | ) | (12 | ) | (281 | ) |
Net charge-offs | 282 |
| 3,617 |
| | 236 |
| 4,135 |
| | 95 |
| | 3,407 |
| | 118 |
| 3,620 |
| | (6 | ) | 1,313 |
| 162 |
| 1,469 |
| | 107 |
| 1,202 |
| 52 |
| 1,361 |
|
Write-offs of PCI loans(a) | 132 |
| — |
| | — |
| 132 |
| | 151 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 151 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 50 |
| — |
| — |
| 50 |
|
Provision for loan losses | (265 | ) | 4,017 |
| | 296 |
| 4,048 |
| | (152 | ) | | 3,557 |
| | (111 | ) | 3,294 |
| | 613 |
| 5,063 |
| 1,742 |
| 7,418 |
| | 120 |
| 1,202 |
| 170 |
| 1,492 |
|
Other | — |
| (1 | ) | | 10 |
| 9 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 2 |
| (1 | ) | 6 |
| 7 |
|
Ending balance at September 30, | $ | 3,467 |
| $ | 5,583 |
| | $ | 4,185 |
| $ | 13,235 |
| | $ | 4,182 |
| | $ | 5,034 |
| | $ | 3,912 |
| $ | 13,128 |
| | |
Ending balance at March 31, | | $ | 3,454 |
| $ | 14,950 |
| $ | 4,840 |
| $ | 23,244 |
| | $ | 3,399 |
| $ | 5,183 |
| $ | 4,951 |
| $ | 13,533 |
|
| | | | |
Allowance for lending-related commitments | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,179 |
| $ | 1,191 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,043 |
| $ | 1,055 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | 133 |
| — |
| (35 | ) | 98 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
|
Provision for lending-related commitments | | 6 |
| — |
| 852 |
| 858 |
| | — |
| — |
| 3 |
| 3 |
|
Other | | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Ending balance at March 31, | | $ | 151 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,996 |
| $ | 2,147 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,046 |
| $ | 1,058 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses by impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific(b) | $ | 145 |
| $ | 488 |
| (c) | $ | 342 |
| $ | 975 |
| | $ | 204 |
| | $ | 421 |
| (c) | $ | 280 |
| $ | 905 |
| | $ | 223 |
| $ | 530 |
| $ | 556 |
| $ | 1,309 |
| | $ | 89 |
| $ | 461 |
| $ | 479 |
| $ | 1,029 |
|
Formula-based | 2,066 |
| 5,095 |
| | 3,843 |
| 11,004 |
| | 2,154 |
| | 4,613 |
| | 3,632 |
| 10,399 |
| | |
Portfolio-based | | 3,231 |
| 14,420 |
| 4,284 |
| 21,935 |
| | 1,572 |
| 4,722 |
| 4,472 |
| 10,766 |
|
PCI | 1,256 |
| — |
| | — |
| 1,256 |
| | 1,824 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1,824 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 1,738 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,738 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 3,467 |
| $ | 5,583 |
| | $ | 4,185 |
| $ | 13,235 |
| | $ | 4,182 |
| | $ | 5,034 |
| | $ | 3,912 |
| $ | 13,128 |
| | $ | 3,454 |
| $ | 14,950 |
| $ | 4,840 |
| $ | 23,244 |
| | $ | 3,399 |
| $ | 5,183 |
| $ | 4,951 |
| $ | 13,533 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans by impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific | $ | 6,341 |
| $ | 1,423 |
| | $ | 1,536 |
| $ | 9,300 |
| | $ | 7,046 |
| | $ | 1,284 |
| | $ | 1,051 |
| $ | 9,381 |
| | |
Formula-based | 304,178 |
| 158,148 |
| | 435,971 |
| 898,297 |
| | 343,703 |
| | 146,572 |
| | 422,783 |
| 913,058 |
| | |
Asset-specific(b) | | $ | 17,036 |
| $ | 1,505 |
| $ | 2,021 |
| $ | 20,562 |
| | $ | 6,536 |
| $ | 1,365 |
| $ | 1,860 |
| $ | 9,761 |
|
Portfolio-based | | 276,743 |
| 152,516 |
| 553,268 |
| 982,527 |
| | 292,465 |
| 149,150 |
| 469,258 |
| 910,873 |
|
PCI | 21,290 |
| — |
| | — |
| 21,290 |
| | 25,209 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| 25,212 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 23,207 |
| — |
| — |
| 23,207 |
|
Total retained loans | $ | 331,809 |
| $ | 159,571 |
| | $ | 437,507 |
| $ | 928,887 |
| | $ | 375,958 |
| | $ | 147,856 |
| | $ | 423,837 |
| $ | 947,651 |
| | $ | 293,779 |
| $ | 154,021 |
| $ | 555,289 |
| $ | 1,003,089 |
| | $ | 322,208 |
| $ | 150,515 |
| $ | 471,118 |
| $ | 943,841 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired collateral-dependent loans | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateral-dependent loans | | | | |
Net charge-offs | $ | 28 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 23 |
| $ | 51 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 15 |
| | $ | 29 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 17 |
| $ | 46 |
| | $ | 9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 11 |
| $ | 20 |
|
Loans measured at fair value of collateral less cost to sell | 2,083 |
| — |
| | 113 |
| 2,196 |
| | 2,077 |
| | — |
| | 258 |
| 2,335 |
| | 2,941 |
| — |
| 94 |
| 3,035 |
| | 2,098 |
| — |
| 154 |
| 2,252 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for lending-related commitments | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 1,022 |
| $ | 1,055 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,035 |
| $ | 1,068 |
| | |
Provision for lending-related commitments | — |
| — |
| | 110 |
| 110 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
| 29 |
| | |
Other | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | |
Ending balance at September 30, | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 1,132 |
| $ | 1,165 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,064 |
| $ | 1,097 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for lending-related commitments by impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 135 |
| $ | 135 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 71 |
| $ | 71 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 187 |
| $ | 187 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 114 |
| $ | 114 |
|
Formula-based | 33 |
| — |
| | 997 |
| 1,030 |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | 993 |
| 1,026 |
| | |
Total allowance for lending-related commitments | $ | 33 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 1,132 |
| $ | 1,165 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,064 |
| $ | 1,097 |
| | |
Portfolio-based | | 151 |
| — |
| 1,809 |
| 1,960 |
| | 12 |
| — |
| 932 |
| 944 |
|
Total allowance for lending-related commitments(c) | | $ | 151 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,996 |
| $ | 2,147 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,046 |
| $ | 1,058 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lending-related commitments by impairment methodology | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-specific | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 446 |
| $ | 446 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 252 |
| $ | 252 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 619 |
| $ | 619 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 455 |
| $ | 455 |
|
Formula-based | 53,591 |
| 645,880 |
| | 395,173 |
| 1,094,644 |
| | 50,630 |
| | 600,728 |
| | 397,064 |
| 1,048,422 |
| | |
Portfolio-based(d) | | 33,498 |
| — |
| 357,866 |
| 391,364 |
| | 28,666 |
| — |
| 393,555 |
| 422,221 |
|
Total lending-related commitments | $ | 53,591 |
| $ | 645,880 |
| | $ | 395,619 |
| $ | 1,095,090 |
| | $ | 50,630 |
| | $ | 600,728 |
| | $ | 397,316 |
| $ | 1,048,674 |
| | $ | 33,498 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 358,485 |
| $ | 391,983 |
| | $ | 28,666 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 394,010 |
| $ | 422,676 |
|
| |
(a) | Write-offsPrior to the adoption of CECL, write-offs of PCI loans arewere recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceedexceeded estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan iswas recognized when the underlying loan iswas removed from a pool. |
| |
(b) | Includes modified PCD loans and loans that have been modified or are reasonably expected to be modified in a TDR. Also includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR. |
| |
(c) | for the wholesale portfolio segment. The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses is relatedloans modified, or reasonably expected to loans that have beenbe modified, in a TDR; such allowanceTDR is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates. |
| |
(c) | The allowance for lending-related commitments is reported in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(d) | At March 31, 2020 and 2019, lending-related commitments excluded $8.0 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively, for the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment; and $681.4 billion and $626.9 billion, respectively, for the credit card portfolio segment, which were not subject to the allowance for lending-related commitments. |
| |
(e) | Excludes HTM securities, which had an allowance for credit losses of $19 million and a provision for credit losses of $9 million as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2020. |
Discussion of current period changes
The increase in the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments in the first quarter of 2020 was primarily
driven by an increase in the provision for credit losses, reflecting deterioration in the macroeconomic environment as a result
of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and continued pressure on oil prices. In light of the rapidly evolving economic conditions and forecasts during March 2020, management updated its macroeconomic forecast near the end of its credit loss estimation process in early April. This macroeconomic forecast included a decline in the U.S. real GDP of approximately 25% and an increase in the U.S. unemployment rate to above 10%, both in the second quarter, followed by a solid recovery in the second half of 2020. In addition, the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments reflect the estimated impact of the Firm’s payment relief actions as well as the federal government’s stimulus programs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods.
Note 1314 – Variable interest entities
Refer to Note 1 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further description of JPMorgan Chase’s accounting policies regarding consolidation of VIEs.
The following table summarizes the most significant types of Firm-sponsored VIEs by business segment.
|
| | | |
Line of Business | Transaction Type | Activity | Form 10-Q page reference |
CCB | Credit card securitization trusts | Securitization of originated credit card receivables | 139145 |
| Mortgage securitization trusts | Servicing and securitization of both originated and purchased residential mortgages | 139-141145-147 |
CIB | Mortgage and other securitization trusts | Securitization of both originated and purchased residential and commercial mortgages, and other consumer loans | 139-141145-147 |
| Multi-seller conduits | Assist clients in accessing the financial markets in a cost-efficient manner and structures transactions to meet investor needs | 141147 |
| Municipal bond vehicles | Financing of municipal bond investments | 141147 |
The Firm also invests in and provides financing and other services to VIEs sponsored by third parties. Refer to pages 142–143148–149 of this Note for more information on the VIEs sponsored by third parties.
Significant Firm-sponsored VIEs
Credit card securitizations
Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of JPMorgan Chase’s involvement with credit card securitizations.
As a result of the Firm’s continuing involvement, the Firm is considered to be the primary beneficiary of its Firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts, including its primary vehicle,trust, the Chase Issuance Trust. Refer to the table on page 142148 of this Note for further information on consolidated VIE assets and liabilities.
Firm-sponsored mortgage and other securitization trusts
The Firm securitizes (or has securitized) originated and purchased residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans primarily in its CCB and CIB businesses. Depending on the particular transaction, as well as the respective business involved, the Firm may act as the servicer of the loans and/or retain certain beneficial interests in the securitization trusts.
Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s involvement with Firm-sponsored mortgage and other securitization trusts, as well as the accounting treatment relating to such trusts.
The following table presents the total unpaid principal amount of assets held in Firm-sponsored private-label securitization entities, including those in which the Firm has continuing involvement, and those that are consolidated by the Firm. Continuing involvement includes servicing the loans, holding senior interests or subordinated interests (including amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules), recourse or guarantee arrangements, and derivative contracts. In certain instances, the Firm’s only continuing involvement is servicing the loans. The Firm’s maximum loss exposure from retained and purchased interests is the carrying value of these interests. Refer to Securitization activity on page 143149 of this Note for further information regarding the Firm’s cash flows associated with and interests retained in nonconsolidated VIEs, and pages 143–144149–150 of this Note for information on the Firm’s loan sales and securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs andgovernment agencies.
| | | Principal amount outstanding | | JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e) | Principal amount outstanding | | JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e) |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Total assets held by securitization VIEs | Assets held in consolidated securitization VIEs | Assets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvement | | Trading assets | Investment securities | Other financial assets | Total interests held by JPMorgan Chase | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Total assets held by securitization VIEs | Assets held in consolidated securitization VIEs | Assets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvement | | Trading assets | Investment securities | Other financial assets | Total interests held by JPMorgan Chase |
Securitization-related(a) | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage: | | | | | | |
Prime/Alt-A and option ARMs | $ | 61,480 |
| $ | 2,966 |
| $ | 49,826 |
| | $ | 522 |
| $ | 728 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,250 |
| $ | 59,615 |
| $ | 2,657 |
| $ | 48,743 |
| | $ | 588 |
| $ | 1,127 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,715 |
|
Subprime | 15,156 |
| — |
| 14,085 |
| | 16 |
| — |
| — |
| 16 |
| 14,198 |
| 51 |
| 13,024 |
| | 9 |
| — |
| — |
| 9 |
|
Commercial and other(b) | 101,624 |
| — |
| 86,302 |
| | 919 |
| 708 |
| 234 |
| 1,861 |
| 114,032 |
| — |
| 94,361 |
| | 989 |
| 1,197 |
| 273 |
| 2,459 |
|
Total | $ | 178,260 |
| $ | 2,966 |
| $ | 150,213 |
| | $ | 1,457 |
| $ | 1,436 |
| $ | 234 |
| $ | 3,127 |
| $ | 187,845 |
| $ | 2,708 |
| $ | 156,128 |
| | $ | 1,586 |
| $ | 2,324 |
| $ | 273 |
| $ | 4,183 |
|
| | | Principal amount outstanding | | JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e) | Principal amount outstanding | | JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e) |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Total assets held by securitization VIEs | Assets held in consolidated securitization VIEs | Assets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvement | | Trading assets | Investment securities | Other financial assets | Total interests held by JPMorgan Chase | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Total assets held by securitization VIEs | Assets held in consolidated securitization VIEs | Assets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvement | | Trading assets | Investment securities | Other financial assets | Total interests held by JPMorgan Chase |
Securitization-related(a) | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage: | | | | | | |
Prime/Alt-A and option ARMs | $ | 63,350 |
| $ | 3,237 |
| $ | 50,679 |
| | $ | 623 |
| $ | 647 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,270 |
| $ | 60,348 |
| $ | 2,796 |
| $ | 48,734 |
| | $ | 535 |
| $ | 625 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,160 |
|
Subprime | 16,729 |
| 32 |
| 15,434 |
| | 53 |
| — |
| — |
| 53 |
| 14,661 |
| — |
| 13,490 |
| | 7 |
| — |
| — |
| 7 |
|
Commercial and other(b) | 102,961 |
| — |
| 79,387 |
| | 783 |
| 801 |
| 210 |
| 1,794 |
| 111,903 |
| — |
| 80,878 |
| | 785 |
| 773 |
| 241 |
| 1,799 |
|
Total | $ | 183,040 |
| $ | 3,269 |
| $ | 145,500 |
| | $ | 1,459 |
| $ | 1,448 |
| $ | 210 |
| $ | 3,117 |
| $ | 186,912 |
| $ | 2,796 |
| $ | 143,102 |
| | $ | 1,327 |
| $ | 1,398 |
| $ | 241 |
| $ | 2,966 |
|
| |
(a) | Excludes U.S. GSEs and government agency securitizations and re-securitizations, which are not Firm-sponsored. Refer to pages 143–144149–150 of this Note for information on the Firm’s loan sales and securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs and government agencies. |
| |
(b) | Consists of securities backed by commercial real estate loans and non-mortgage-related consumer receivables purchased from third parties. |
| |
(c) | Excludes the following: retained servicing (refer to Note 1415 for a discussion of MSRs); securities retained from loan sales and securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs and government agencies; interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks of securitization entities (Refer(refer to Note 45 for further information on derivatives); senior and subordinated securities of $168$525 million and $69$184 million, respectively, at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and $87$106 million and $28$94 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018,2019, which the Firm purchased in connection with CIB’s secondary market-making activities. |
| |
(d) | Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions. |
| |
(e) | As of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, 67%2019, 64% and 60%63%, respectively, of the Firm’s retained securitization interests, which are predominantly carried at fair value and include amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, were risk-rated “A” or better, on an S&P-equivalent basis. The retained interests in prime residential mortgages consisted of $1.2$1.7 billion and $1.3$1.1 billion of investment-grade retained interests, and $55$61 million and $16$72 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. The retained interests in commercial and other securitizations trusts consisted of $1.3$1.6 billion and $1.2 billion of investment-grade retained interests, at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and $567$881 million and $623$575 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. |
Residential mortgage
The Firm securitizes residential mortgage loans originated by CCB, as well as residential mortgage loans purchased from third parties by either CCB or CIB. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed description of the Firm’s involvement with residential mortgage securitizations. Refer to the table on page 142148 of this Note for more information on the consolidated residential mortgage securitizations, and the table on the previous page of this Note for further information on interests held in nonconsolidated residential mortgage securitizations.
Commercial mortgages and other consumer securitizations
CIB originates and securitizes commercial mortgage loans, and engages in underwriting and trading activities involving the securities issued by securitization trusts. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed description of the Firm’s involvement with commercial mortgage and other consumer securitizations. Refer to the table on page 142148 of this Note for more information on the consolidated commercial mortgage securitizations, and the table on the previous page of this Note for further information on interests held in nonconsolidated securitizations.
Re-securitizations
Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chase’s participation in certain re-securitization transactions.
The following table presents the principal amount of securities transferred to re-securitization VIEs.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Transfers of securities to VIEs | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 2,717 |
| | $ | 4,503 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
|
Transfers of securities to VIEs | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | $ | 5,377 |
| | $ | 2,540 |
| | $ | 12,444 |
| | $ | 11,321 |
|
The Firm did not transfer any private label securities to re-securitization VIEs during the first three months of 2020 and 2019, respectively, and retained interests in any such Firm-sponsored VIEs as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were immaterial.The following table presents information on nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | | | |
Interest in VIEs | $ | 3,162 |
| | $ | 2,928 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs |
(in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
Firm-sponsored private-label | | | |
Assets held in VIEs with continuing involvement(a) | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 118 |
|
Interest in VIEs | — |
| | 10 |
|
U.S. GSEs and government agencies | | | |
Interest in VIEs | 2,097 |
| | 3,058 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents the principal amount and includes the notional amount of interest-only securities. |
As of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm did not consolidate any U.S. GSE and government agency re-securitization VIEs or any Firm-sponsored private-label re-securitization VIEs.
Multi-seller conduits
Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chase’s principal involvement with Firm-administered multi-seller conduits.
In the normal course of business, JPMorgan Chase makes markets in and invests in commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The Firm held $12.6$14.7 billion and $20.1$16.3 billion of the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, which have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm’s investments reflect the Firm’s funding needs and capacity and were not driven by market illiquidity. Other than the amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, the Firm is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits.
Deal-specific liquidity facilities, program-wide liquidity and credit enhancement provided by the Firm have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm or the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits provide lending-related commitments to certain clients of the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The unfunded commitments were $8.5$7.1 billion and $8.0$8.9 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, and are reported as off-balance sheet lending-related commitments in other unfunded commitments to extend credit. Refer to Note 2223 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.
Municipal bond vehicles
Municipal bond vehicles or tender option bond (“TOB”) trusts allow institutions to finance their municipal bond investments at short-term rates. TOB transactions are known as customer TOB trusts and non-customer TOB trusts. Customer TOB trusts are sponsored by a third party, refer to pages 142–143148–149 of this Note for further information.
The Firm serves as sponsor for all non-customer TOB transactions. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chase’s Municipal bond vehicles.
Consolidated VIE assets and liabilities
The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs consolidated by the Firm as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | | Assets | | Liabilities | Assets | | Liabilities |
September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Trading assets | Loans | Other(b) | Total assets(c) | | Beneficial interests in VIE assets(d) | Other(e) | Total liabilities | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions) | | Trading assets | Loans | Other(b) | Total assets(c) | | Beneficial interests in VIE assets(d) | Other(e) | Total liabilities |
VIE program type | | | | | | |
Firm-sponsored credit card trusts | $ | — |
| $ | 27,377 |
| $ | 370 |
| $ | 27,747 |
| | $ | 6,457 |
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 6,463 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 13,202 |
| $ | 265 |
| $ | 13,467 |
| | $ | 6,562 |
| $ | 4 |
| $ | 6,566 |
|
Firm-administered multi-seller conduits | 3 |
| 22,708 |
| 334 |
| 23,045 |
| | 10,514 |
| 35 |
| 10,549 |
| 1 |
| 26,661 |
| 348 |
| 27,010 |
| | 12,174 |
| 36 |
| 12,210 |
|
Municipal bond vehicles | 1,280 |
| — |
| 3 |
| 1,283 |
| | 1,249 |
| 2 |
| 1,251 |
| 1,778 |
| — |
| 7 |
| 1,785 |
| | 589 |
| 4 |
| 593 |
|
Mortgage securitization entities(a) | 70 |
| 2,937 |
| 58 |
| 3,065 |
| | 295 |
| 137 |
| 432 |
| 110 |
| 2,608 |
| 76 |
| 2,794 |
| | 305 |
| 125 |
| 430 |
|
Other | 108 |
| — |
| 209 |
| 317 |
| | — |
| 121 |
| 121 |
| 46 |
| — |
| 295 |
| 341 |
| | — |
| 147 |
| 147 |
|
Total | $ | 1,461 |
| $ | 53,022 |
| $ | 974 |
| $ | 55,457 |
| | $ | 18,515 |
| $ | 301 |
| $ | 18,816 |
| $ | 1,935 |
| $ | 42,471 |
| $ | 991 |
| $ | 45,397 |
| | $ | 19,630 |
| $ | 316 |
| $ | 19,946 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Assets | | Liabilities | Assets | | Liabilities |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Trading assets | Loans | Other(b) | Total assets(c) | | Beneficial interests in VIE assets(d) | Other(e) | Total liabilities | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Trading assets | Loans | Other(b) | Total assets(c) | | Beneficial interests in VIE assets(d) | Other(e) | Total liabilities |
VIE program type | | | | | | |
Firm-sponsored credit card trusts | $ | — |
| $ | 31,760 |
| $ | 491 |
| $ | 32,251 |
| | $ | 13,404 |
| $ | 12 |
| $ | 13,416 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14,986 |
| $ | 266 |
| $ | 15,252 |
| | $ | 6,461 |
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 6,467 |
|
Firm-administered multi-seller conduits | — |
| 24,411 |
| 300 |
| 24,711 |
| | 4,842 |
| 33 |
| 4,875 |
| 1 |
| 25,183 |
| 355 |
| 25,539 |
| | 9,223 |
| 36 |
| 9,259 |
|
Municipal bond vehicles | 1,779 |
| — |
| 4 |
| 1,783 |
| | 1,685 |
| 3 |
| 1,688 |
| 1,903 |
| — |
| 4 |
| 1,907 |
| | 1,881 |
| 3 |
| 1,884 |
|
Mortgage securitization entities(a) | 53 |
| 3,285 |
| 40 |
| 3,378 |
| | 308 |
| 161 |
| 469 |
| 66 |
| 2,762 |
| 64 |
| 2,892 |
| | 276 |
| 130 |
| 406 |
|
Other | 134 |
| — |
| 178 |
| 312 |
| | 2 |
| 103 |
| 105 |
| 663 |
| — |
| 192 |
| 855 |
| | — |
| 272 |
| 272 |
|
Total | $ | 1,966 |
| $ | 59,456 |
| $ | 1,013 |
| $ | 62,435 |
| | $ | 20,241 |
| $ | 312 |
| $ | 20,553 |
| $ | 2,633 |
| $ | 42,931 |
| $ | 881 |
| $ | 46,445 |
| | $ | 17,841 |
| $ | 447 |
| $ | 18,288 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes residential and commercial mortgage securitizations. |
| |
(b) | Includes assets classified as cash and other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(c) | The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The assets and liabilities include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. |
| |
(d) | The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are classified in the line item on the Consolidated balance sheets titled, “Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities.” The holders of these beneficial interests generally do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. Refer to noteNote 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for conduits program-wide credit enhancements. Included in beneficial interests in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $6.8$6.9 billion and $13.7$6.7 billion at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019, respectively. |
| |
(e) | Includes liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. |
VIEs sponsored by third parties
The Firm enters into transactions with VIEs structured by other parties. These include, for example, acting as a derivative counterparty, liquidity provider, investor, underwriter, placement agent, remarketing agent, trustee or custodian. These transactions are conducted at arm’s-length, and individual credit decisions are based on the analysis of the specific VIE, taking into consideration the quality of the underlying assets. Where the Firm does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, or a variable interest that could potentially be significant, the Firm generally does not consolidate the VIE, but it records and reports these positions on its Consolidated balance sheets in the same manner it would record and report positions in respect of any other third-party transaction.
Tax credit vehicles
The Firm holds investments in unconsolidated tax credit vehicles, which are limited partnerships and similar entities that construct, own and operate affordable housing, wind, solarenergy, and other alternative energy projects. These entities are primarily considered VIEs. A
third party is typically the
general partner or managing member and has control over the significant activities of the tax credit vehicles, and accordingly the Firm does not consolidate tax credit vehicles. The Firm generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits allocated to the projects. The maximum loss exposure, represented by equity investments and funding commitments, was $17.0$19.2 billion and $16.5$19.1 billion, of which $4.8$5.4 billion and $4.0$5.5 billion was unfunded at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. In order to reduce the risk of loss, the Firm assesses each project and withholds varying amounts of its capital investment until the project qualifies for tax credits. Refer to Note 2425 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on affordable housing tax credits. Refer to Note 2223 of this Form 10-Q for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.
Customer municipal bond vehicles (TOB trusts)
The Firm may provide various services to Customercustomer TOB trusts, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider. In certain Customercustomer TOB transactions, the
Firm, as liquidity provider, has entered into a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder.
In those transactions, upon the termination of the vehicle, the Firm has recourse to the third-party Residual holders for any shortfall. The Firm does not have any intent to protect Residual holders from potential losses on any of the underlying municipal bonds. The Firm does not consolidate Customercustomer TOB trusts, since the Firm does not have the power to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle.
The Firm’s maximum exposure as a liquidity provider to Customercustomer TOB trusts at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and
December 31, 20182019 was $5.3 billion and $4.8$5.5 billion, respectively. The fair value of assets held by such VIEs at September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, was $8.6$8.1 billion and $7.7$8.6 billion, respectively. Refer to Note 2223 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.
Loan securitizations
The Firm has securitized and sold a variety of loans, including residential mortgage, credit card, and commercial mortgage. Refer to Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further description of the Firm’s accounting policies regarding securitizations.
Securitization activity
The following table provides information related to the Firm’s securitization activities for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, related to assets held in Firm-sponsored securitization entities that were not consolidated by the Firm, and where sale accounting was achieved at the time of the securitization.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
(in millions) | Residential mortgage(e) | Commercial and other(f) | | Residential mortgage(e) | Commercial and other(f) | | Residential mortgage(e) | Commercial and other(f) | | Residential mortgage(e) | Commercial and other(f) | Residential mortgage(d) | Commercial and other(e) | | Residential mortgage(d) | Commercial and other(e) |
Principal securitized | $ | 3,225 |
| $ | 1,477 |
| | $ | 1,513 |
| $ | 3,533 |
| | $ | 7,132 |
| $ | 4,215 |
| | $ | 5,972 |
| $ | 8,705 |
| $ | 3,064 |
| $ | 3,188 |
| | $ | 1,782 |
| $ | 764 |
|
All cash flows during the period(a): | | | | | | | | |
All cash flows during the period:(a) | | | | |
Proceeds received from loan sales as financial instruments(b)(c) | $ | 3,327 |
| $ | 1,506 |
| | $ | 1,524 |
| $ | 3,558 |
| | $ | 7,337 |
| $ | 4,329 |
| | $ | 5,984 |
| $ | 8,745 |
| $ | 3,136 |
| $ | 3,273 |
| | $ | 1,822 |
| $ | 782 |
|
Servicing fees collected(d) | 70 |
| — |
| | 80 |
| 1 |
| | 220 |
| 1 |
| | 240 |
| 1 |
| 62 |
| — |
| | 77 |
| — |
|
Cash flows received on interests | 115 |
| 34 |
| | 99 |
| 99 |
| | 314 |
| 183 |
| | 328 |
| 230 |
| 117 |
| 29 |
| | 85 |
| 51 |
|
| |
(a) | Excludes re-securitization transactions. |
| |
(b) | Predominantly includes Level 2 assets. |
| |
(c) | The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. |
| |
(d) | The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
| |
(e) | Includes prime mortgages only. Excludes loan securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs and government agencies. |
| |
(f)(e) | Includes commercial mortgage and other consumer loans. |
Loans and excess MSRs sold to U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to
Ginnie Mae guidelines
In addition to the amounts reported in the securitization activity tables above, the Firm, in the normal course of business, sells originated and purchased mortgage loans and certain originated excess MSRs on a nonrecourse basis, predominantly to U.S. GSEs. These loans and excess MSRs are sold primarily for the purpose of securitization by the U.S. GSEs, who provide certain guarantee provisions (e.g., credit enhancement of the loans). The Firm also sells loans into securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines; these loans are typically insured or guaranteed by another U.S. government agency. The Firm does not consolidate the securitization vehicles underlying these transactions as it is not the primary beneficiary. For a limited number of loan sales, the Firm is obligated to share
a portion of the credit risk associated with the sold loans with the purchaser. Refer to Note 2223 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 2728 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information about the Firm’s loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications. Refer to Note 1415 for additional information about the impact of the Firm’s sale of certain excess MSRs.
The following table summarizes the activities related to loans sold to the U.S. GSEs, and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 | 2018 | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Carrying value of loans sold | $ | 35,556 |
| $ | 11,968 |
| | $ | 73,873 |
| $ | 28,804 |
| $ | 24,935 |
| $ | 15,179 |
|
Proceeds received from loan sales as cash | 3 |
| 1 |
| | 73 |
| 1 |
| 9 |
| 68 |
|
Proceeds from loan sales as securities(a)(b) | 35,512 |
| 11,713 |
| | 73,172 |
| 28,291 |
| 24,663 |
| 14,837 |
|
Total proceeds received from loan sales(c) | $ | 35,515 |
| $ | 11,714 |
| | $ | 73,245 |
| $ | 28,292 |
| $ | 24,672 |
| $ | 14,905 |
|
Gains on loan sales(d)(e) | $ | 342 |
| $ | 9 |
| | $ | 495 |
| $ | 32 |
| |
Gains/(losses) on loan sales(d)(e) | | $ | 4 |
| $ | 49 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes securities from U.S. GSEs and Ginnie Mae that are generally sold shortly after receipt or retained as part of the Firm’s Investmentinvestment securities portfolio. |
| |
(b) | Included in level 2 assets. |
| |
(c) | Excludes the value of MSRs retained upon the sale of loans. |
| |
(d) | GainsGains/(losses) on loan sales include the value of MSRs. |
| |
(e) | The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. |
Options to repurchase delinquent loans
In addition to the Firm’s obligation to repurchase certain loans due to material breaches of representations and warranties as discussed in Note 22,23, the Firm also has the option to repurchase delinquent loans that it services for Ginnie Mae loan pools, as well as for other U.S. government
agencies under certain arrangements. The Firm typically elects to repurchase delinquent loans from Ginnie Mae loan
pools as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with the applicable requirements, and such loans continue to be insured or guaranteed. When the Firm’s repurchase option becomes exercisable, such loans must be reported on the Consolidated balance sheets as a loan with a corresponding liability. Refer to Note 1112 for additional information.
The following table presents loans the Firm repurchased or had an option to repurchase, real estate owned, and foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans recognized on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019. Substantially all of these loans and real estate are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies.
| | (in millions) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Loans repurchased or option to repurchase(a) | $ | 4,761 |
| $ | 7,021 |
| $ | 1,906 |
| $ | 2,941 |
|
Real estate owned | 50 |
| 75 |
| 29 |
| 41 |
|
Foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans(b) | 241 |
| 361 |
| 138 |
| 198 |
|
| |
(a) | Predominantly all of these amounts relate to loans that have been repurchased from Ginnie Mae loan pools. |
| |
(b) | Relates to voluntary repurchases of loans, which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable. |
Loan delinquencies and liquidation losses
The table below includes information about components of and delinquencies related to nonconsolidated securitized financial assets held in Firm-sponsored private-label securitization entities, in which the Firm has continuing involvement and delinquencies as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | | | | | | Net liquidation losses(a) | | | | | Net liquidation losses |
| Securitized assets | | 90 days past due | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Securitized assets | | 90 days past due | | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Securitized loans | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prime / Alt-A & option ARMs | $ | 49,826 |
| $ | 50,679 |
| | $ | 2,679 |
| $ | 3,354 |
| | $ | 146 |
| $ | 182 |
| | $ | 474 |
| $ | 453 |
| $ | 48,743 |
| $ | 48,734 |
| | $ | 2,312 |
| $ | 2,449 |
| | $ | 99 |
| $ | 157 |
|
Subprime | 14,085 |
| 15,434 |
| | 1,962 |
| 2,478 |
| | 145 |
| 155 |
| | 456 |
| (307 | ) | 13,024 |
| 13,490 |
| | 1,654 |
| 1,813 |
| | 86 |
| 144 |
|
Commercial and other | 86,302 |
| 79,387 |
| | 153 |
| 225 |
| | 118 |
| 71 |
| | 283 |
| 119 |
| 94,361 |
| 80,878 |
| | 223 |
| 187 |
| | 10 |
| 141 |
|
Total loans securitized | $ | 150,213 |
| $ | 145,500 |
| | $ | 4,794 |
| $ | 6,057 |
| | $ | 409 |
| $ | 408 |
| | $ | 1,213 |
| $ | 265 |
| $ | 156,128 |
| $ | 143,102 |
| | $ | 4,189 |
| $ | 4,449 |
| | $ | 195 |
| $ | 442 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes liquidation gains as a result of private label mortgage settlement payments during the first quarter of 2018, which were reflected as asset recoveries by trustees. |
Note 1415 – Goodwill and Mortgage servicing rights
Refer to Note 15 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the accounting policies related to goodwill and mortgage servicing rights.
Goodwill
The following table presents goodwill attributed to the business segments.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Consumer & Community Banking(a) | $ | 31,038 |
| $ | 30,984 |
| $ | 30,083 |
| $ | 30,082 |
|
Corporate & Investment Bank(a) | 6,941 |
| 6,770 |
| 7,876 |
| 7,901 |
|
Commercial Banking | 2,982 |
| 2,860 |
| 2,986 |
| 2,982 |
|
Asset & Wealth Management | 6,857 |
| 6,857 |
| 6,855 |
| 6,858 |
|
Total goodwill | $ | 47,818 |
| $ | 47,471 |
| $ | 47,800 |
| $ | 47,823 |
|
| |
(a) | In the first quarter of 2020, the Merchant Services business was realigned from CCB to CIB, including the associated Goodwill of $959 million. Prior periods have been revised to conform with current period presentation. |
The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 47,477 |
| | $ | 47,488 |
| | $ | 47,471 |
| | $ | 47,507 |
| $ | 47,823 |
| | $ | 47,471 |
|
Changes during the period from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Business combinations(a) | 348 |
| | — |
| | 348 |
| | — |
| |
Other(b) | (7 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (24 | ) | |
Balance at September 30, | $ | 47,818 |
| | $ | 47,483 |
| | $ | 47,818 |
| | $ | 47,483 |
| |
Other(a) | | (23 | ) | | 3 |
|
Balance at March 31, | | $ | 47,800 |
| | $ | 47,474 |
|
| |
(a) | For the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2019, represents goodwill associated with the July 24, 2019 acquisition of InstaMed. This goodwill was allocated to CIB, CB and CCB. |
| |
(b) | Primarily relates to foreign currency adjustments. |
Goodwill impairment testing
Effective January 1, 2020, the Firm adopted new accounting guidance related to goodwill impairment testing. The adoption of the guidance requires recognition of an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of a reporting unit falls below its carrying value. It eliminated the requirement that an impairment loss be recognized only if the estimated implied fair value of the goodwill is below its carrying value. Refer to Impairment testing on pages 252–253Note 15 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further descriptiondiscussion of the Firm’s goodwill impairment testing, including the primary method used to estimate the fair value of the reporting units and the assumptions used in the goodwill impairment test.
The Firm reviewed current economic conditions, estimated market cost of equity, as well as actual and projections of business performanceGoodwill is tested for all its businesses. Based upon such reviews, the Firm concluded that the goodwill allocated to its reporting units was not impaired as of September 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018, nor was goodwill written off due to impairment during the nine months ended September 30, 2019fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or 2018.more often if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be an impairment.
DeclinesUnanticipated declines in business performance, increases in credit losses, increases in capital requirements, as well as deterioration in economic or market conditions, adverse regulatory or legislative changes or increases in the estimated market cost of equity, could cause the estimated fair values of the Firm’s reporting units or their associated goodwill to decline in the future, which could result in a material impairment charge to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill.
As of March 31, 2020, the Firm reviewed current economic conditions, including the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on business performance, estimated market cost of equity, and also reviewed actual and projections of business performance for all its reporting units. The Firm has concluded that the goodwill allocated to its reporting units was 0t impaired as of March 31, 2020, or December 31, 2019, nor was goodwill written off due to impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or 2019.
Mortgage servicing rights
MSRs represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by estimated costs to service the loans, and generally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively amortizing the MSR asset against contractual servicing and ancillary fee income. MSRs are either purchased from third parties or recognized upon sale or securitization of mortgage loans if servicing is retained. Refer to Notes 2 and 15 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further description of the MSR asset, interest rate risk management, and the valuation of MSRs.
The following table summarizes MSR activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019. | | | As of or for the three months ended September 30, | As of or for the nine months ended September 30, | As of or for the three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
Fair value at beginning of period | $ | 5,093 |
| $ | 6,241 |
| $ | 6,130 |
| | $ | 6,030 |
| $ | 4,699 |
| | $ | 6,130 |
|
MSR activity: | | | | | | |
Originations of MSRs | 390 |
| 278 |
| 1,146 |
| | 611 |
| 271 |
| | 332 |
|
Purchase of MSRs | (2 | ) | 13 |
| 104 |
| | 159 |
| 2 |
| | 104 |
|
Disposition of MSRs(a) | (359 | ) | (2 | ) | (687 | ) | | (401 | ) | (75 | ) | | (111 | ) |
Net additions/(dispositions) | 29 |
| 289 |
| 563 |
| | 369 |
| 198 |
| | 325 |
|
| | | | | | |
Changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows | (256 | ) | (195 | ) | (702 | ) | | (542 | ) | (248 | ) | | (199 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions: | | | | | | |
Changes due to market interest rates and other(b) | (433 | ) | 150 |
| (1,274 | ) | | 635 |
| (1,370 | ) | | (301 | ) |
Changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions: | | | | | | |
Projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service) | 17 |
| 14 |
| (333 | ) | (e) | 14 |
| (1 | ) | | — |
|
Discount rates | — |
| — |
| 153 |
| | 24 |
| — |
| | — |
|
Prepayment model changes and other(c) | (31 | ) | (66 | ) | (118 | ) | | (97 | ) | (11 | ) | | 2 |
|
Total changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions | (14 | ) | (52 | ) | (298 | ) | | (59 | ) | (12 | ) | | 2 |
|
Total changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions | (447 | ) | 98 |
| (1,572 | ) | | 576 |
| (1,382 | ) | | (299 | ) |
Fair value at September 30, | $ | 4,419 |
| $ | 6,433 |
| $ | 4,419 |
| | $ | 6,433 |
| |
Fair value at March 31, | | $ | 3,267 |
| | $ | 5,957 |
|
| | | | | | |
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs held at September 30, | $ | (447 | ) | $ | 98 |
| $ | (1,572 | ) | | $ | 576 |
| |
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs held at March 31, | | $ | (1,382 | ) | | $ | (299 | ) |
Contractual service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees included in income | 397 |
| 428 |
| 1,254 |
| | 1,339 |
| 364 |
| | 420 |
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced at September 30, (in billions) | 537 |
| 528 |
| 537 |
| | 528 |
| |
Servicer advances, net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts, at September 30, (in billions)(d) | 2.0 |
| 3.1 |
| 2.0 |
| | 3.1 |
| |
Third-party mortgage loans serviced at March 31, (in billions) | | 506 |
| | 530 |
|
Servicer advances, net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts, at March 31, (in billions)(d) | | 1.7 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes excess MSRs transferred to agency-sponsored trusts in exchange for stripped mortgage backed securities (“SMBS”). In each transaction, a portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties at the transaction date; the Firm acquired the remaining balance of those SMBS as trading securities. |
| |
(b) | Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments. |
| |
(c) | Represents changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates. |
| |
(d) | Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these servicer advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is typically senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment to investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance. However, certain of these servicer advances may not be recoverable if they were not made in accordance with applicable rules and agreements. |
| |
(e) | The decrease in projected cash flows was largely related to default servicing assumption updates. |
The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the impact of MSR risk management activities) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| 2020 |
| | 2019 |
|
CCB mortgage fees and related income | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net production revenue | | $ | 738 |
| | $ | 108 |
| | $ | 1,291 |
| | $ | 296 |
| $ | 319 |
| | $ | 200 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net mortgage servicing revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan servicing revenue | | 351 |
| | 435 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 1,389 |
| 339 |
| | 404 |
|
Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows | | (256 | ) | | (195 | ) | | (702 | ) | | (542 | ) | (248 | ) | | (199 | ) |
Total operating revenue | | 95 |
| | 240 |
| | 470 |
| | 847 |
| 91 |
| | 205 |
|
Risk management: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a) | | (433 | ) | | 150 |
| | (1,274 | ) | | 636 |
| (1,370 | ) | | (301 | ) |
Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b) | | (14 | ) | | (52 | ) | | (298 | ) | | (59 | ) | (12 | ) | | 2 |
|
Change in derivative fair value and other | | 500 |
| | (186 | ) | | 1,372 |
| | (671 | ) | 1,292 |
| | 290 |
|
Total risk management | | 53 |
| | (88 | ) | | (200 | ) | | (94 | ) | (90 | ) | | (9 | ) |
Total net mortgage servicing revenue | | 148 |
| | 152 |
| | 270 |
| | 753 |
| 1 |
| | 196 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Total CCB mortgage fees and related income | | 886 |
| | 260 |
| | 1,561 |
| | 1,049 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
All other | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
| |
Mortgage fees and related income | | $ | 887 |
| | $ | 262 |
| | $ | 1,562 |
| | $ | 1,051 |
| $ | 320 |
| | $ | 396 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments. |
| |
(b) | Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices). |
The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Firm’s MSRs at September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, and outlines hypothetical sensitivities of those fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below.
| | (in millions, except rates) | (in millions, except rates) | Sep 30, 2019 |
| | Dec 31, 2018 |
| (in millions, except rates) | Mar 31, 2020 |
| | Dec 31, 2019 |
|
Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate) | Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate) | 13.81 | % | | 8.78 | % | Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate) | 19.12 | % | | 11.67 | % |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change | Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change | $ | (206 | ) | | $ | (205 | ) | Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change | $ | (206 | ) | | $ | (200 | ) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change | Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change | (393 | ) | | (397 | ) | Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change | (391 | ) | | (384 | ) |
Weighted-average option adjusted spread(b)(a) | Weighted-average option adjusted spread(b)(a) | 8.26 | % | | 7.87 | % | Weighted-average option adjusted spread(b)(a) | 8.95 | % | | 7.93 | % |
Impact on fair value of a 100 basis point adverse change | Impact on fair value of a 100 basis point adverse change | $ | (150 | ) | | $ | (235 | ) | Impact on fair value of a 100 basis point adverse change | $ | (103 | ) | | $ | (169 | ) |
Impact on fair value of a 200 basis point adverse change | Impact on fair value of a 200 basis point adverse change | (289 | ) | | (452 | ) | Impact on fair value of a 200 basis point adverse change | (200 | ) | | (326 | ) |
| |
(a) | Includes the impact of operational risk and regulatory capital. |
| |
(b) | The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value are often highly interrelated and may not be linear. In this table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which would either magnify or counteract the impact of the initial change.
Note 1516 – Deposits
Refer to Note 17 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on deposits.
At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018, 2019, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits were as follows.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
U.S. offices | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing (included $23,225 and $17,204 at fair value)(a)(b) | $ | 393,522 |
| | $ | 386,709 |
| |
Interest-bearing (included $2,523 and $2,487 at fair value)(a)(b) | 844,137 |
| | 813,881 |
| |
Noninterest-bearing (included $17,046 and $22,637 at fair value)(a) | | $ | 448,195 |
| | $ | 395,667 |
|
Interest-bearing (included $2,631 and $2,534 at fair value)(a) | | 1,026,603 |
| | 876,156 |
|
Total deposits in U.S. offices | 1,237,659 |
| | 1,200,590 |
| 1,474,798 |
| | 1,271,823 |
|
Non-U.S. offices | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing (included $2,289 and $2,367 at fair value)(a)(b) | 21,455 |
| | 21,459 |
| |
Interest-bearing (included $1,318 and $1,159 at fair value)(a)(b) | 266,147 |
| | 248,617 |
| |
Noninterest-bearing (included $1,784 and $1,980 at fair value)(a) | | 22,192 |
| | 20,087 |
|
Interest-bearing (included $1,148 and $1,438 at fair value)(a) | | 339,019 |
| | 270,521 |
|
Total deposits in non-U.S. offices | 287,602 |
| | 270,076 |
| 361,211 |
| | 290,608 |
|
Total deposits | $ | 1,525,261 |
| | $ | 1,470,666 |
| $ | 1,836,009 |
| | $ | 1,562,431 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes structured notes classified as deposits for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K for a further discussion.information. |
| |
(b) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm reclassified balances related to certain structured notes from interest-bearing to noninterest-bearing deposits as the associated returns are recorded in principal transactions revenue and not in net interest income. This change was applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
Note 1617 – Leases
Lease commitments
Effective January 1,Refer to Note 18 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2019 the Firm adopted new guidance that requires lessees to recognizeForm 10-K for a further discussion on the Consolidated balance sheets all leases with lease terms greater than twelve months as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. Accordingly, the Firm recognized operating lease liabilities and ROU assets of $8.2 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively. The adoption of the new lease guidance did not have a material impact on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income. The change in accounting due to the adoption of the new lease guidance did not result in a material change to the future net minimum rental payments/receivables or to the net rental expense when compared to December 31, 2018.leases.
Firm as lessee
At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries were obligated under a number of noncancelablenoncancellable leases, predominantly operating leases for premises and equipment used primarily for business purposes. These leases generally have terms of 20 years or less, determined based on the contractual maturity of the lease, and include periods covered by options to extend or terminate the lease when the Firm is reasonably certain that it will exercise those options. None of these lease agreements impose restrictions on the Firm’s ability to pay dividends, engage in debt or equity financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements. Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses that will increase rental payments based on maintenance, utility and tax increases, which are non-lease components. The Firm elected not to separate lease and non-lease components of a contract for its real estate leases. As such, real estate lease payments represent payments on both lease and non-lease components.
Operating lease liabilities and ROU assets are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The future lease payments are discounted at a rate that represents the Firm’s collateralized borrowing rate for financing instruments of a similar term and are included in accounts payable and other liabilities. The operating lease ROU asset, included in premises and equipment, also includes any lease prepayments made, plus initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. Rental expense associated with operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and generally included in occupancy expense in the Consolidated statements of income.
The following tables providetable provides information related to the Firm’s operating leases:
|
| | | |
As of September 30, (in millions, except where otherwise noted) | |
2019 |
Right-of-use assets | $ | 8,160 |
|
Lease liabilities | 8,425 |
|
| |
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | 8.7 |
|
Weighted average discount rate | 3.73 | % |
| |
Supplemental cash flow information | |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows | $ | 1,177 |
|
Supplemental non-cash information | |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations | $ | 990 |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | Three months ended September 30, 2019 | Nine months ended September 30, 2019 |
Rental expense | | |
Gross rental expense | $ | 517 |
| $ | 1,537 |
|
Sublease rental income | (49 | ) | (137 | ) |
Net rental expense | $ | 468 |
| $ | 1,400 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 |
Right-of-use assets | $ | 8,240 |
| $ | 8,190 |
|
Lease liabilities | 8,516 |
| 8,505 |
|
The following table presents future payments under operating leases as of September 30, 2019:
|
| | | |
Year ended December 31, (in millions) | |
2019 (excluding nine months ended September 30, 2019) | $ | 394 |
|
2020 | 1,569 |
|
2021 | 1,394 |
|
2022 | 1,198 |
|
2023 | 1,027 |
|
After 2023 | 4,442 |
|
Total future minimum lease payments | 10,024 |
|
Less: Imputed interest | (1,599 | ) |
Total | $ | 8,425 |
|
In addition toFirm’s net rental expense was $475 million and $468 million for the table above, as of September 30,three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Firm had additional future operating lease commitments of $1.3 billion that were signed but had not yet commenced. These operating leases will commence between 2019 and 2022 with lease terms up to 25 years.respectively.
Firm as lessor
The Firm provides auto and equipment lease financing to its customers through lease arrangements with lease terms that may contain renewal, termination and/or purchase options. Generally, the Firm’s lease financings are generally operating leases. These assetsleases and are recognizedincluded in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to reduce the asset to its estimated residual value. Depreciation expense is included in technology, communications and equipment
expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm’s lease income is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in other income in the Consolidated statements of income.
On a periodic basis, the Firm assesses leased assets for impairment, and if the carrying amount of the leased asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from the lease payments and the estimated residual value upon disposition of the leased asset, an impairment loss is recognized.
The risk of loss on auto and equipment leased assets relating to the residual value of the leased assets is monitored through projections of the asset residual values at lease origination and periodic review of residual values, and is mitigated through arrangements with certain manufacturers or lessees.
The following table presents the carrying value of assets subject to leases reported on the Consolidated balance sheets:
|
| | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | September 30, 2019 | December 31, 2018 |
Carrying value of assets subject to operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation | | $ | 22,953 |
| $ | 21,428 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | 5,848 |
| 5,303 |
|
sheets.The following table presents the Firm’s operating lease income and the related depreciation expense on the Consolidated statements of income:
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) | | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Operating lease income | | $ | 1,384 |
| $ | 1,157 |
| $ | 4,027 |
| $ | 3,316 |
| | $ | 1,413 |
| $ | 1,316 |
|
Depreciation expense | | 1,053 |
| 901 |
| 3,038 |
| 2,564 |
| | 1,140 |
| 997 |
|
The following table presents future receipts under operating leases as of September 30, 2019:
|
| | | |
Year ended December 31, (in millions) | |
2019 (excluding nine months ended September 30, 2019) | $ | 1,121 |
|
2020 | 3,785 |
|
2021 | 2,303 |
|
2022 | 660 |
|
2023 | 74 |
|
After 2023 | 137 |
|
Total future minimum lease payments | $ | 8,080 |
|
Note 1718 - Preferred stock
Refer to Note 2021 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion on preferred stock.
The following is a summary of JPMorgan Chase’s non-cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, and the quarterly dividend declarations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | Carrying value (in millions) | | Contractual rate in effect at March 31, 2020 | Earliest redemption date | Floating annualized rate of three-month LIBOR/Term SOFR plus: | Dividend declared per share | |
| March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | Issue date | Three months ended March 31, | |
| 2020 | 2019 | |
Fixed-rate: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series P | — |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| 2/5/2013 | — | % | 3/1/2018 | NA | $— | $136.25 | |
Series T | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1/30/2014 | — |
| 3/1/2019 | NA | — | 167.50 | |
Series W | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6/23/2014 | — |
| 9/1/2019 | NA | — | 157.50 | |
Series Y | — |
| 143,000 |
| — |
| 1,430 |
| 2/12/2015 | — |
| 3/1/2020 | NA | 153.13 | 153.13 | |
Series AA | 142,500 |
| 142,500 |
| 1,425 |
| 1,425 |
| 6/4/2015 | 6.100 |
| 9/1/2020 | NA | 152.50 | 152.50 | |
Series BB | 115,000 |
| 115,000 |
| 1,150 |
| 1,150 |
| 7/29/2015 | 6.150 |
| 9/1/2020 | NA | 153.75 | 153.75 | |
Series DD | 169,625 |
| 169,625 |
| 1,696 |
| 1,696 |
| 9/21/2018 | 5.750 |
| 12/1/2023 | NA | 143.75 | 143.75 | |
Series EE | 185,000 |
| 185,000 |
| 1,850 |
| 1,850 |
| 1/24/2019 | 6.000 |
| 3/1/2024 | NA | 150.00 | NA | |
Series GG | 90,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 900 |
| 900 |
| 11/7/2019 | 4.750 |
| 12/1/2024 | NA | 150.42 | NA | |
Fixed-to-floating-rate: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series I | 293,375 |
| 293,375 |
| $ | 2,934 |
| $ | 2,934 |
| 4/23/2008 | LIBOR + 3.47% |
| 4/30/2018 | LIBOR + 3.47% | $132.44 | $155.51 | |
Series Q | 150,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 1,500 |
| 1,500 |
| 4/23/2013 | 5.150 |
| 5/1/2023 | LIBOR + 3.25 | 128.75 | 128.75 | |
Series R | 150,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 1,500 |
| 1,500 |
| 7/29/2013 | 6.000 |
| 8/1/2023 | LIBOR + 3.30 | 150.00 | 150.00 | |
Series S | 200,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 1/22/2014 | 6.750 |
| 2/1/2024 | LIBOR + 3.78 | 168.75 | 168.75 | |
Series U | 100,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 1,000 |
| 1,000 |
| 3/10/2014 | 6.125 |
| 4/30/2024 | LIBOR + 3.33 | 153.13 | 153.13 | |
Series V | 250,000 |
| 250,000 |
| 2,500 |
| 2,500 |
| 6/9/2014 | LIBOR + 3.32% |
| 7/1/2019 | LIBOR + 3.32 | 130.73 | 125.00 | (a) |
Series X | 160,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 1,600 |
| 1,600 |
| 9/23/2014 | 6.100 |
| 10/1/2024 | LIBOR + 3.33 | 152.50 | 152.50 | |
Series Z | 200,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 4/21/2015 | 5.300 |
| 5/1/2020 | LIBOR + 3.80 | 132.50 | 132.50 | |
Series CC | 125,750 |
| 125,750 |
| 1,258 |
| 1,258 |
| 10/20/2017 | 4.625 |
| 11/1/2022 | LIBOR + 2.58 | 115.63 | 115.63 | |
Series FF | 225,000 |
| 225,000 |
| 2,250 |
| 2,250 |
| 7/31/2019 | 5.000 |
| 8/1/2024 | SOFR + 3.38 | 125.00 | NA | |
Series HH | 300,000 |
| — |
| 3,000 |
| — |
| 1/23/2020 | 4.600 |
| 2/1/2025 | SOFR + 3.125 | 125.22 | NA | (b) |
Series II | 150,000 |
| — |
| 1,500 |
| — |
| 2/24/2020 | 4.000 |
| 4/1/2025 | SOFR + 2.745 | — | NA | (c) |
Total preferred stock | 3,006,250 |
| 2,699,250 |
| $ | 30,063 |
| $ | 26,993 |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | Carrying value (in millions) | | Contractual rate in effect at September 30, 2019 | Earliest redemption date(b) | Floating annualized rate of three-month LIBOR/Term SOFR plus: | Dividend declared per share(c) | |
| September 30, 2019(a) | December 31, 2018(a) | September 30, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | Issue date | Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |
Fixed-rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series P | 90,000 |
| 90,000 |
| $ | 900 |
| $ | 900 |
| 2/5/2013 | 5.450 | % | 3/1/2018 | NA | $ | 136.25 |
| $136.25 | $ | 408.75 |
| $408.75 | |
Series T | — |
| 92,500 |
| — |
| 925 |
| 1/30/2014 | — |
| 3/1/2019 | NA | NA | 167.50 | 167.50 | 502.50 | |
Series W | — |
| 88,000 |
| — |
| 880 |
| 6/23/2014 | — |
| 9/1/2019 | NA | NA | 157.50 | 472.50 | 472.50 | |
Series Y | 143,000 |
| 143,000 |
| 1,430 |
| 1,430 |
| 2/12/2015 | 6.125 |
| 3/1/2020 | NA | 153.13 |
| 153.13 | 459.39 | 459.39 | |
Series AA | 142,500 |
| 142,500 |
| 1,425 |
| 1,425 |
| 6/4/2015 | 6.100 |
| 9/1/2020 | NA | 152.50 |
| 152.50 | 457.50 | 457.50 | |
Series BB | 115,000 |
| 115,000 |
| 1,150 |
| 1,150 |
| 7/29/2015 | 6.150 |
| 9/1/2020 | NA | 153.75 |
| 153.75 | 461.25 | 461.25 | |
Series DD | 169,625 |
| 169,625 |
| 1,696 |
| 1,696 |
| 9/21/2018 | 5.750 |
| 12/1/2023 | NA | 143.75 |
| NA | 431.25 | NA | |
Series EE | 185,000 |
| — |
| 1,850 |
| — |
| 1/24/2019 | 6.000 |
| 3/1/2024 | NA | 150.00 |
| NA | 361.67 | NA | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed-to-floating-rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series I | 430,375 |
| 430,375 |
| $ | 4,304 |
| $ | 4,304 |
| 4/23/2008 | LIBOR + 3.47% |
| 4/30/2018 | LIBOR + 3.47% | $ | 146.58 |
| $148.45 | $ | 455.09 |
| $493.29 | (d) |
Series Q | 150,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 1,500 |
| 1,500 |
| 4/23/2013 | 5.150 |
| 5/1/2023 | LIBOR + 3.25 | 128.75 |
| 128.75 | 386.25 | 386.25 | |
Series R | 150,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 1,500 |
| 1,500 |
| 7/29/2013 | 6.000 |
| 8/1/2023 | LIBOR + 3.30 | 150.00 |
| 150.00 | 450.00 | 450.00 | |
Series S | 200,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 1/22/2014 | 6.750 |
| 2/1/2024 | LIBOR + 3.78 | 168.75 |
| 168.75 | 506.25 | 506.25 | |
Series U | 100,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 1,000 |
| 1,000 |
| 3/10/2014 | 6.125 |
| 4/30/2024 | LIBOR + 3.33 | 153.13 |
| 153.13 | 459.38 | 459.38 | |
Series V | 250,000 |
| 250,000 |
| 2,500 |
| 2,500 |
| 6/9/2014 | LIBOR + 3.32% |
| 7/1/2019 | LIBOR + 3.32 | 144.11 |
| 125.00 | 394.11 | 375.00 | (e) |
Series X | 160,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 1,600 |
| 1,600 |
| 9/23/2014 | 6.100 |
| 10/1/2024 | LIBOR + 3.33 | 152.50 |
| 152.50 | 457.50 | 457.50 | |
Series Z | 200,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 2,000 |
| 4/21/2015 | 5.300 |
| 5/1/2020 | LIBOR + 3.80 | 132.50 |
| 132.50 | 397.50 | 397.50 | |
Series CC | 125,750 |
| 125,750 |
| 1,258 |
| 1,258 |
| 10/20/2017 | 4.625 |
| 11/1/2022 | LIBOR + 2.58 | 115.63 |
| 115.63 | 346.88 | 346.88 | |
Series FF | 225,000 |
| — |
| 2,250 |
| — |
| 7/31/2019 | 5.000 |
| 8/1/2024 | SOFR + 3.38 | 126.39 |
| NA | 126.39 | NA | (f) |
Total preferred stock | 2,836,250 |
| 2,606,750 |
| $ | 28,363 |
| $ | 26,068 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
(a) | Represented by depositary shares. |
| |
(b) | Fixed-to-floating rate notes convert to a floating rate at the earliest redemption date. |
| |
(c) | Dividends are declared quarterly. Dividends are payable quarterly on fixed-rate preferred stock. Dividends are payable semiannually on fixed-to-floating-rate preferred stock while at a fixed rate, and payable quarterly after converting to a floating rate. |
| |
(d) | Prior to April 30, 2018, the dividend rate was fixed at 7.90%. |
| |
(e) | Prior to July 1, 2019, the dividend rate was fixed at 5%. |
| |
(f)(b) | Dividends in the amount of $126.39$125.22 per share were declared on September 9, 2019March 13, 2020 and include dividends from the original issue date of JulyJanuary 23, 2020 through March 31, 20192020. |
| |
(c) | From the original issue date of February 24, 2020 through OctoberMarch 31, 2019.2020, dividends have yet to be declared for Series II. |
Each series of preferred stock has a liquidation value and redemption price per share of $10,000, plus accrued but unpaid dividends. The aggregate liquidation value was $30.5 billion at March 31, 2020.
Redemptions
On October 31, 2019,March 1, 2020, the Firm announced and priced an offeringredeemed all $1.43 billion of depositary shares representing $900 million of 4.75% non-cumulativeits 6.125% preferred stock, Series GG. This issuance is expected to close on November 7, 2019. Y.
On NovemberDecember 1, 2019, the Firm announced that it will redeemredeemed all $900 million of its 5.45% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series P on December 1, 2019.P.
On October 30, 2019, the Firm redeemed $1.37 billion of its Series I fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock.stock, Series I.
On September 1, 2019, the Firm redeemed all $880 million of its 6.3% non-cumulative preferred stock, series W.
On July 31, 2019, the Firm issued $2.25 billion of fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative6.30% preferred stock, Series FF.W.
On January 24, 2019, the Firm issued $1.85 billion of 6.00% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series EE, and on March 1, 2019, the Firm redeemed all $925 million of its 6.70% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series T.
Note 1819 – Earnings per share
Refer to Note 2223 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 2018.2019.
| | (in millions, except per share amounts) | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Basic earnings per share | | | | |
Net income | $ | 9,080 |
| $ | 8,380 |
| | $ | 27,911 |
| $ | 25,408 |
| $ | 2,865 |
| $ | 9,179 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends | 423 |
| 379 |
| | 1,201 |
| 1,167 |
| 421 |
| 374 |
|
Net income applicable to common equity | 8,657 |
| 8,001 |
| | 26,710 |
| 24,241 |
| 2,444 |
| 8,805 |
|
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | 51 |
| 53 |
| | 159 |
| 174 |
| 13 |
| 52 |
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders | $ | 8,606 |
| $ | 7,948 |
| | $ | 26,551 |
| $ | 24,067 |
| $ | 2,431 |
| $ | 8,753 |
|
| | | | |
Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding | 3,198.5 |
| 3,376.1 |
| | 3,248.7 |
| 3,416.5 |
| 3,095.8 |
| 3,298.0 |
|
Net income per share | $ | 2.69 |
| $ | 2.35 |
| | $ | 8.17 |
| $ | 7.04 |
| $ | 0.79 |
| $ | 2.65 |
|
| | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | |
Net income applicable to common stockholders | $ | 8,606 |
| $ | 7,948 |
| | $ | 26,551 |
| $ | 24,067 |
| $ | 2,431 |
| $ | 8,753 |
|
Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding | 3,198.5 |
| 3,376.1 |
| | 3,248.7 |
| 3,416.5 |
| 3,095.8 |
| 3,298.0 |
|
Add: Employee stock options, SARs, warrants and unvested PSUs | 8.7 |
| 18.2 |
| | 9.3 |
| 19.7 |
| |
Add: Dilutive impact of SARs and employee stock options, unvested PSUs and nondividend-earning RSUs | | 4.9 |
| 10.2 |
|
Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding | 3,207.2 |
| 3,394.3 |
| | 3,258.0 |
| 3,436.2 |
| 3,100.7 |
| 3,308.2 |
|
Net income per share | $ | 2.68 |
| $ | 2.34 |
| | $ | 8.15 |
| $ | 7.00 |
| $ | 0.78 |
| $ | 2.65 |
|
Note 1920 – Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
AOCI includes the after-tax change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, foreign currency translation adjustments (including the impact of related derivatives), fair value changes of excluded components on fair value hedges, cash flow hedging activities, net loss and prior service costs/(credit) related to the Firm’s defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, and on fair value option-elected liabilities arising from changes in the Firm’s own credit risk (DVA).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at July 1, 2019 | | $ | 3,709 |
| | | | $ | (652 | ) | | | $ | (73 | ) | | $ | 126 |
| | | | $ | (2,231 | ) | | | $ | 235 |
| | | $ | 1,114 |
| |
| Net change | | 479 |
| | | | (165 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | 195 |
| | | | 46 |
| | | 132 |
| | | 686 |
| |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | | $ | 4,188 |
| | | | $ | (817 | ) | | | $ | (74 | ) | | $ | 321 |
| | | | $ | (2,185 | ) | | | $ | 367 |
| | | $ | 1,800 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at July 1, 2018 | | $ | 1,599 |
| | | | $ | (632 | ) | | | (162 | ) | | $ | (147 | ) | | | | $ | (1,876 | ) | | | $ | 80 |
| | | $ | (1,138 | ) | |
| Net change | | (819 | ) | | | | (31 | ) | | | 34 |
| | (88 | ) | | | | 19 |
| | | (402 | ) | | | (1,287 | ) | |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | | $ | 780 |
| | | | $ | (663 | ) | | | $ | (128 | ) | | $ | (235 | ) | | | | $ | (1,857 | ) | | | $ | (322 | ) | | | $ | (2,425 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | | $ | 1,202 |
| | | | $ | (727 | ) | | | $ | (161 | ) | | $ | (109 | ) | | | | $ | (2,308 | ) | | | $ | 596 |
| | | $ | (1,507 | ) | |
| Net change | | 2,986 |
| | | | (90 | ) | | | 87 |
| | 430 |
| | | | 123 |
| | | (229 | ) | | | 3,307 |
| |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | | $ | 4,188 |
| | | | $ | (817 | ) | | | $ | (74 | ) | | $ | 321 |
| | | | $ | (2,185 | ) | | | $ | 367 |
| | | $ | 1,800 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at January 1, 2018 | | $ | 2,164 |
| | | | $ | (470 | ) | | | $ | — |
| | $ | 76 |
| | | | $ | (1,521 | ) | | | $ | (368 | ) | | | $ | (119 | ) | |
| Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles(a) | | 896 |
| | | | (277 | ) | | | $ | (54 | ) | | 16 |
| | | | (414 | ) | | | (79 | ) | | | 88 |
| |
| Net change | | (2,280 | ) | | | | 84 |
| | | (74 | ) | | (327 | ) | | | | 78 |
| | | 125 |
| | | (2,394 | ) | |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | | $ | 780 |
| | | | $ | (663 | ) | | | $ | (128 | ) | | $ | (235 | ) | | | | $ | (1,857 | ) | | | $ | (322 | ) | | | $ | (2,425 | ) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, 2020 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | | $ | 4,057 |
| | | | $ | (707 | ) | | | $ | (131 | ) | | $ | 63 |
| | | | $ | (1,344 | ) | | | $ | (369 | ) | | | $ | 1,569 |
| |
| Net change | | 1,119 |
| | | | (330 | ) | | | 88 |
| | 2,465 |
| | | | 33 |
| | | 2,474 |
| | | 5,849 |
| |
| Balance at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 5,176 |
| (a)
| | | $ | (1,037 | ) | | | $ | (43 | ) | | $ | 2,528 |
| | | | $ | (1,311 | ) | | | $ | 2,105 |
| | | $ | 7,418 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of or for the three months ended March 31, 2019 (in millions) | Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities | | Translation adjustments, net of hedges | | Fair value hedges | Cash flow hedges | | Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans | DVA on fair value option elected liabilities | Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | | $ | 1,202 |
| | | | $ | (727 | ) | | | (161 | ) | | $ | (109 | ) | | | | $ | (2,308 | ) | | | $ | 596 |
| | | $ | (1,507 | ) | |
| Net change | | 1,414 |
| | | | (24 | ) | | | 2 |
| | 138 |
| | | | 36 |
| | | (617 | ) | | | 949 |
| |
| Balance at March 31, 2019 | | $ | 2,616 |
| | | | $ | (751 | ) | | | $ | (159 | ) | | $ | 29 |
| | | | $ | (2,272 | ) | | | $ | (21 | ) | | | $ | (558 | ) | |
| |
(a) | Represents the adjustmentIncludes after-tax net unamortized unrealized gains of $737 million related to AOCI as a result of the accounting standards adopted in the first quarter of 2018, referAFS securities that have been transferred to Note 1 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2018 Form 10-K.HTM. |
The following table presents the pre-tax and after-tax changes in the components of OCI. | | | 2019 | | 2018 | 2020 | | 2019 |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax | | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax | |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) | | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax | | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax |
Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period | $ | 708 |
| | $ | (169 | ) | | $ | 539 |
| | $ | (1,117 | ) | | $ | 262 |
| | $ | (855 | ) | $ | 1,709 |
| | $ | (413 | ) | | $ | 1,296 |
| | $ | 1,875 |
| | $ | (451 | ) | | $ | 1,424 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(a) | (78 | ) | | 18 |
| | (60 | ) | | 46 |
| | (10 | ) | | 36 |
| (233 | ) | | 56 |
| | (177 | ) | | (13 | ) | | 3 |
| | (10 | ) |
Net change | 630 |
| | (151 | ) | | 479 |
| | (1,071 | ) | | 252 |
| | (819 | ) | 1,476 |
| | (357 | ) | | 1,119 |
| | 1,862 |
| | (448 | ) | | 1,414 |
|
Translation adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustments(b): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation | (861 | ) | | 40 |
| | (821 | ) | | (314 | ) | | 45 |
| | (269 | ) | (1,592 | ) | | 55 |
| | (1,537 | ) | | 41 |
| | (36 | ) | | 5 |
|
Hedges | 866 |
| | (210 | ) | | 656 |
| | 311 |
| | (73 | ) | | 238 |
| 1,589 |
| | (382 | ) | | 1,207 |
| | (38 | ) | | 9 |
| | (29 | ) |
Net change | 5 |
| | (170 | ) | | (165 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (28 | ) | | (31 | ) | (3 | ) | | (327 | ) | | (330 | ) | | 3 |
| | (27 | ) | | (24 | ) |
Fair value hedges, net change(b):
| (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 45 |
| | (11 | ) | | 34 |
| |
Fair value hedges, net change(c):
| | 115 |
| | (27 | ) | | 88 |
| | 3 |
| | (1 | ) | | 2 |
|
Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period | 222 |
| | (55 | ) | | 167 |
| | (122 | ) | | 27 |
| | (95 | ) | 3,251 |
| | (780 | ) | | 2,471 |
| | 141 |
| | (33 | ) | | 108 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(c) | 37 |
| | (9 | ) | | 28 |
| | 9 |
| | (2 | ) | | 7 |
| |
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(d) | | (8 | ) | | 2 |
| | (6 | ) | | 39 |
| | (9 | ) | | 30 |
|
Net change | 259 |
| | (64 | ) | | 195 |
| | (113 | ) | | 25 |
| | (88 | ) | 3,243 |
| | (778 | ) | | 2,465 |
| | 180 |
| | (42 | ) | | 138 |
|
Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net gain/(loss) arising during the period | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 9 |
| | (2 | ) | | 7 |
| | 3 |
| | (2 | ) | | 1 |
|
Reclassification adjustments included in net income(d): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustments included in net income(e): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of net loss | 42 |
| | (10 | ) | | 32 |
| | 26 |
| | (6 | ) | | 20 |
| 4 |
| | (1 | ) | | 3 |
| | 42 |
| | (9 | ) | | 33 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7 | ) | | 2 |
| | (5 | ) | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Foreign exchange and other | 18 |
| | (4 | ) | | 14 |
| | 7 |
| | (3 | ) | | 4 |
| 31 |
| | (9 | ) | | 22 |
| | (8 | ) | | 9 |
| | 1 |
|
Net change | 60 |
| | (14 | ) | | 46 |
| | 26 |
| | (7 | ) | | 19 |
| 45 |
| | (12 | ) | | 33 |
| | 38 |
| | (2 | ) | | 36 |
|
DVA on fair value option elected liabilities, net change: | 173 |
| | (41 | ) | | 132 |
| | (527 | ) | | 125 |
| | (402 | ) | 3,255 |
| | (781 | ) | | 2,474 |
| | (807 | ) | | 190 |
| | (617 | ) |
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) | $ | 1,126 |
| | $ | (440 | ) | | $ | 686 |
| | $ | (1,643 | ) | | $ | 356 |
| | $ | (1,287 | ) | $ | 8,131 |
| | $ | (2,282 | ) | | $ | 5,849 |
| | $ | 1,279 |
| | $ | (330 | ) | | $ | 949 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax | | Pre-tax | | Tax effect | | After-tax | |
Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period | $ | 4,074 |
| | $ | (985 | ) | | $ | 3,089 |
| | $ | (3,351 | ) | | $ | 787 |
| | $ | (2,564 | ) | |
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(a) | (135 | ) | | 32 |
| | (103 | ) | | 371 |
| | (87 | ) | | 284 |
| |
Net change | 3,939 |
| | (953 | ) | | 2,986 |
| | (2,980 | ) | | 700 |
| | (2,280 | ) | |
Translation adjustments(e): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation | (697 | ) | | 76 |
| | (621 | ) | | (981 | ) | | 188 |
| | (793 | ) | |
Hedges | 700 |
| | (169 | ) | | 531 |
| | 1,149 |
| | (272 | ) | | 877 |
| |
Net change | 3 |
| | (93 | ) | | (90 | ) | | 168 |
| | (84 | ) | | 84 |
| |
Fair value hedges, net change(b): | 114 |
| | (27 | ) | | 87 |
| | (96 | ) | | 22 |
| | (74 | ) | |
Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period | 464 |
| | (112 | ) | | 352 |
| | (365 | ) | | 85 |
| | (280 | ) | |
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(c) | 102 |
| | (24 | ) | | 78 |
| | (62 | ) | | 15 |
| | (47 | ) | |
Net change | 566 |
| | (136 | ) | | 430 |
| | (427 | ) | | 100 |
| | (327 | ) | |
Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net gain/(loss) arising during the period | 2 |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | 25 |
| | (6 | ) | | 19 |
| |
Reclassification adjustments included in net income(d): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of net loss | 125 |
| | (26 | ) | | 99 |
| | 78 |
| | (18 | ) | | 60 |
| |
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit) | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | (19 | ) | | 5 |
| | (14 | ) | |
Settlement (gain)/loss
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Foreign exchange and other | 19 |
| | 4 |
| | 23 |
| | 19 |
| | (6 | ) | | 13 |
| |
Net change | 148 |
| | (25 | ) | | 123 |
| | 103 |
| | (25 | ) | | 78 |
| |
DVA on fair value option elected liabilities, net change: | $ | (296 | ) | | $ | 67 |
| | $ | (229 | ) | | $ | 163 |
| | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | 125 |
| |
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) | $ | 4,474 |
| | $ | (1,167 | ) | | $ | 3,307 |
| | $ | (3,069 | ) | | $ | 675 |
| | $ | (2,394 | ) | |
| |
(a) | The pre-tax amount is reported in Investment securities gains/(losses)gains in the Consolidated statements of income. |
| |
(b) | Reclassifications of pre-tax realized gains/(losses) on translation adjustments and related hedges are reported in other income/expense in the Consolidated statements of income. There were no sales or liquidations of legal entities that resulted in reclassifications in the periods presented. |
| |
(c) | Represents changes in fair value of cross-currency swaps attributable to changes in cross-currency basis spreads, which are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recorded in other comprehensive income. The initial cost of cross-currency basis spreads is recognized in earnings as part of the accrual of interest on the cross currency swap. |
| |
(c)(d) | The pre-tax amounts are predominantlyprimarily recorded in noninterest revenue, net interest income and compensation expense in the Consolidated statements of income. |
| |
(d)(e) | The pre-tax amount is reported in other expense in the Consolidated statements of income. |
| |
(e) | Reclassifications of pre-tax realized gains/(losses) on translation adjustments and related hedges are reported in other income/expense in the Consolidated statements of income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Firm reclassified net pre-tax gains of $6 million to other income and $1 million to other expense, respectively. These amounts, which related to the liquidation of certain legal entities, are comprised of $5 million related to net investment hedge gains and $2 million related to cumulative translation adjustments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax loss of $174 million to other expense related to the liquidation of a legal entity, $23 million related to net investment hedge losses and $151 million related to cumulative translation adjustments. |
Note 2021 – Restricted cash and other restricted
assets
Refer to Note 2526 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s restricted cash and other restricted assets.
Certain of the Firm’s cash and other assets are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. These restrictions are imposed by various regulatory authorities based on the particular activities of the Firm’s subsidiaries.
The Firm is also subject to rules and regulations established by other U.S. and non U.S. regulators. As part of its compliance with the respective regulatory requirements, the Firm’s broker-dealer activities are subject to certain restrictions on cash and other assets.
The following table presents the components of the Firm’s restricted cash: | | (in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
|
Cash reserves – Federal Reserve Banks(a) | $ | 26.7 |
| $ | 22.1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 26.6 |
|
Segregated for the benefit of securities and futures brokerage customers | 16.8 |
| 14.6 |
| |
Segregated for the benefit of securities and cleared derivative customers | | 19.7 |
| 16.0 |
|
Cash reserves at non-U.S. central banks and held for other general purposes | 3.6 |
| 4.1 |
| 3.8 |
| 3.9 |
|
Total restricted cash(a)(b) | $ | 47.1 |
| $ | 40.8 |
| $ | 23.5 |
| $ | 46.5 |
|
| |
(a) | Effective March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve temporarily eliminated reserve requirements for depository institutions. |
| |
(b) | Comprises $45.9$22.2 billion and $39.6$45.3 billion in deposits with banks, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively,$1.3 billion and $1.2 billion in cash and due from banks as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, on the Consolidated balance sheets.sheet as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. |
Also, as of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, the Firm had the following other restricted assets:
Cash and securities pledged with clearing organizations for the benefit of customers of $23.6$40.0 billion and $20.6$24.7 billion, respectively.
Securities with a fair value of $13.1$12.8 billion and $9.7$8.8 billion, respectively, were also restricted in relation to customer activity.
Note 2122 – Regulatory capital
Refer to Note 2627 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion on regulatory capital.
The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the consolidated financial holding company. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s insured depository institutions (“IDI”),IDI subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Effective January 1, 2019, the capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the fully phased-in measures under Basel III and represents the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches. During 2018, the required capital measures were subject to the transitional rules and as of December 31, 2018 were the same on a fully phased-in and on a transitional basis.
Under the risk-based capital and leverage-based guidelines of the Federal Reserve, JPMorgan Chase is required to maintain minimum ratios for CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, Tier 1 leverage and the SLR. Failure to meet these minimum requirements could cause the Federal Reserve to take action. IDI subsidiaries are also subject to these capital requirements by their respective primary regulators.
The following table representspresents the minimum and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and its IDI subsidiaries were subject as of September 30,March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
| | | Minimum capital ratios | | Well-capitalized ratios | Minimum capital ratios | | Well-capitalized ratios |
| BHC(a)(e)(f) |
| IDI(b)(e)(f) |
| | BHC(c) | IDI(d) |
| BHC(a)(e) | IDI(b)(e) | | BHC(c) | IDI(d) |
|
Capital ratios | | | | | |
CET1 | 10.5 | % | 7.0 | % | | N/A | 6.5 | % | |
Tier 1 | 12.0 |
| 8.5 |
| | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| |
Total | 14.0 |
| 10.5 |
| | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| |
CET1 capital | | 10.5 | 7.0 | | N/A | 6.5 | % |
Tier 1 capital | | 12.0 | 8.5 | | 6.0 | 8.0 |
|
Total capital | | 14.0 | 10.5 | | 10.0 | 10.0 |
|
Tier 1 leverage | 4.0 |
| 4.0 |
| | N/A | 5.0 |
| 4.0 | | N/A | 5.0 |
|
SLR | 5.0 |
| 6.0 |
| | N/A | 6.0 |
| 5.0 | 6.0 | | N/A | 6.0 |
|
Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and its IDI subsidiaries are subject.
| |
(a) | Represents the minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm under Basel III. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital minimum capital ratio includesratios include a capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% and GSIB surcharge of 3.5% as calculated under Method 2. |
| |
(b) | Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase’s IDI subsidiaries. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital minimum capital ratio includesratios include a capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% that is applicable to the IDI subsidiaries. The IDI subsidiaries are not subject to the GSIB surcharge. |
| |
(c) | Represents requirements for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations issued by the Federal Reserve. |
| |
(d) | Represents requirements for IDI subsidiaries pursuant to regulations issued under the FDIC Improvement Act. |
| |
(e) | For the period ended December 31, 2018, the CET1, Tier 1, Total and Tier 1 leverage minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm were 9.0%, 10.5%, 12.5%, and 4.0% and the CET1, Tier 1, Total and Tier 1 leverage minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm’s IDI subsidiaries were 6.375%, 7.875%, 9.875%, and 4.0%, respectively. |
| |
(f) | Represents minimum SLR requirement of 3.0%, as well as supplementary leverage buffersbuffer requirements of 2.0% and 3.0% for BHC and IDI, respectively. |
Current Expected Credit Losses
As disclosed in the Firm’s 2019 Form 10-K, the Firm initially elected to phase-in the January 1, 2020 (“day 1”) CECL adoption impact to retained earnings of $2.7 billion to CET1 capital, at 25% per year in each of 2020 to 2023. As part of their response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 31, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that provided the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three-year transition period.
The interim final rule provides a uniform approach for estimating the effects of CECL compared to the legacy incurred loss model during the first two years of the transition period (the “day 2” transition amount), whereby the Firm may exclude from CET1 capital 25% of the change in the allowance for credit losses (excluding allowances on PCD loans). The cumulative day 2 transition amount as at December 31, 2021 that is not recognized in CET1 capital as well as the $2.7 billion day 1 impact, will be phased into CET1 capital at 25% per year beginning January 1, 2022. The Firm has elected to apply the CECL capital transition
provisions, and accordingly, for the period ended March 31, 2020, the capital measures of the Firm exclude $4.3 billion, which is the $2.7 billion day 1 impact to retained earnings and 25% of the $6.8 billion increase in the allowance for credit losses (excluding allowances on PCD loans).
The impacts of the CECL capital transition provisions on Tier 2 capital, adjusted average assets, and total leverage exposure have also been incorporated into the Firm’s capital measures. Refer to Note 1 for further information on the CECL accounting guidance.
The following tables present the risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics for JPMorgan Chase and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under both the Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced Approaches. As of September 30, 2019March 31, 2020, the capital measures are presented applying the CECL capital transition provisions. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, JPMorgan Chase and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were well-capitalized and met all capital requirements to which each was subject.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2020 (in millions, except ratios) | Basel III Standardized | | Basel III Advanced |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(c) | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | JPMorgan Chase & Co.(c) | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Risk-based capital metrics:(a) | | | | | |
CET1 capital | $ | 183,591 |
| $ | 204,679 |
| | $ | 183,591 |
| $ | 204,679 |
|
Tier 1 capital | 213,406 |
| 204,691 |
| | 213,406 |
| 204,691 |
|
Total capital | 247,541 |
| 222,994 |
| | 234,434 |
| 210,271 |
|
Risk-weighted assets | 1,598,828 |
| 1,527,914 |
| | 1,489,134 |
| 1,361,789 |
|
CET1 capital ratio | 11.5 | % | 13.4 | % | | 12.3 | % | 15.0 | % |
Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.3 |
| 13.4 |
| | 14.3 |
| 15.0 |
|
Total capital ratio | 15.5 |
| 14.6 |
| | 15.7 |
| 15.4 |
|
Leverage-based capital metrics: | | | | | |
Adjusted average assets(b) | $ | 2,842,244 |
| $ | 2,439,720 |
| | $ | 2,842,244 |
| $ | 2,439,720 |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.5 | % | 8.4 | % | | 7.5 | % | 8.4 | % |
Total leverage exposure | NA |
| NA |
| | $ | 3,535,822 |
| $ | 3,118,192 |
|
SLR | NA |
| NA |
| | 6.0 | % | 6.6 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2019 (in millions, except ratios) | Basel III Standardized Fully Phased-In | | Basel III Advanced Fully Phased-In |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Regulatory capital | | | | | |
CET1 capital | $ | 188,151 |
| $ | 205,347 |
| | $ | 188,151 |
| $ | 205,347 |
|
Tier 1 capital | 214,831 |
| 205,347 |
| | 214,831 |
| 205,347 |
|
Total capital | 243,500 |
| 223,038 |
| | 233,203 |
| 212,919 |
|
| | | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Risk-weighted | 1,527,762 |
| 1,445,648 |
| | 1,435,693 |
| 1,302,749 |
|
Adjusted average(a) | 2,717,852 |
| 2,339,858 |
| | 2,717,852 |
| 2,339,858 |
|
| | | | | |
Capital ratios(b) | | | | | |
CET1 | 12.3 | % | 14.2 | % | | 13.1 | % | 15.8 | % |
Tier 1 | 14.1 |
| 14.2 |
| | 15.0 |
| 15.8 |
|
Total | 15.9 |
| 15.4 |
| | 16.2 |
| 16.3 |
|
Tier 1 leverage(c) | 7.9 |
| 8.8 |
| | 7.9 |
| 8.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions, except ratios) | Basel III Standardized Transitional | | Basel III Advanced Transitional |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(d) | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(d) |
Regulatory capital | | | | | |
CET1 capital | $ | 183,474 |
| $ | 211,671 |
| | $ | 183,474 |
| $ | 211,671 |
|
Tier 1 capital | 209,093 |
| 211,671 |
| | 209,093 |
| 211,671 |
|
Total capital | 237,511 |
| 229,952 |
| | 227,435 |
| 220,025 |
|
| | | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Risk-weighted | 1,528,916 |
| 1,446,529 |
| | 1,421,205 |
| 1,283,146 |
|
Adjusted average(a) | 2,589,887 |
| 2,250,480 |
| | 2,589,887 |
| 2,250,480 |
|
| | | | | |
Capital ratios(b) | | | | | |
CET1 | 12.0 | % | 14.6 | % | | 12.9 | % | 16.5 | % |
Tier 1 | 13.7 |
| 14.6 |
| | 14.7 |
| 16.5 |
|
Total | 15.5 |
| 15.9 |
| | 16.0 |
| 17.1 |
|
Tier 1 leverage(c) | 8.1 |
| 9.4 |
| | 8.1 |
| 9.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2019 (in millions, except ratios) | Basel III Standardized | | Basel III Advanced |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Risk-based capital metrics:(a) | | | | | |
CET1 capital | $ | 187,753 |
| $ | 206,848 |
| | $ | 187,753 |
| $ | 206,848 |
|
Tier 1 capital | 214,432 |
| 206,851 |
| | 214,432 |
| 206,851 |
|
Total capital | 242,589 |
| 224,390 |
| | 232,112 |
| 214,091 |
|
Risk-weighted assets | 1,515,869 |
| 1,457,689 |
| | 1,397,878 |
| 1,269,991 |
|
CET1 capital ratio | 12.4 | % | 14.2 | % | | 13.4 | % | 16.3 | % |
Tier 1 capital ratio | 14.1 |
| 14.2 |
| | 15.3 |
| 16.3 |
|
Total capital ratio | 16.0 |
| 15.4 |
| | 16.6 |
| 16.9 |
|
Leverage-based capital metrics: | | | | | |
Adjusted average assets(b) | $ | 2,730,239 |
| $ | 2,353,432 |
| | $ | 2,730,239 |
| $ | 2,353,432 |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.9 | % | 8.8 | % | | 7.9 | % | 8.8 | % |
Total leverage exposure | NA |
| NA |
| | $ | 3,423,431 |
| $ | 3,044,509 |
|
SLR | NA |
| NA |
| | 6.3 | % | 6.8 | % |
| |
(a) | The capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the lower of the two ratios as calculated under Basel III approaches (Standardized or Advanced). |
| |
(b) | Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 leverage ratio, includes total quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill and other intangible assets. |
| |
(b)(c) | For eachAs of the risk-based capital ratios,March 31, 2020, the capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the lower of the two ratios as calculated under Basel III approaches (Standardized or Advanced).
|
| |
(c) | The Tier 1 leverage ratio is not a risk-based measure of capital.
|
| |
(d) | On May 18, 2019, Chase Bank USA, N.A. merged with and into JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A as the surviving entity. The December 31, 2018 amounts reported for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. retrospectivelymeasures reflect the impactexclusion of assets purchased from money market mutual fund clients pursuant to nonrecourse advances provided under the merger. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Basel III Advanced Fully Phased-In | | Basel III Advanced Fully Phased-In |
(in millions, except ratios) | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(a) |
Total leverage exposure | $ | 3,404,535 |
| $ | 3,007,280 |
| | $ | 3,269,988 |
| $ | 2,915,541 |
|
SLR | 6.3 | % | 6.8 | % | | 6.4 | % | 7.3 | % |
| |
(a) | On May 18, 2019, Chase Bank USA, N.A. merged with and into JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A as the surviving entity. The December 31, 2018 amounts reported for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. retrospectively reflect the impact of the merger.MMLF. |
Note 2223 – Off–balance sheet lending-related
financial instruments, guarantees, and other
commitments
JPMorgan Chase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to address the financing needs of its customers and clients. The contractual amount of these financial instruments represents the maximum possible credit risk to the Firm should the customer or client draw upon the commitment or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and should the customer or client subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these commitments and guarantees arehave historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expireexpired without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firm’s view, representative of its expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. Refer to Note 2728 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion of lending-related commitments and guarantees, and the Firm’s related accounting policies.
To provide for probable expectedcredit losses inherent in wholesale and certain consumer lending-related commitments, an allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. Refer to Note 12 13 for further information regarding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.commitments, including the impact of the Firm’s adoption of the CECL accounting guidance on January 1, 2020.
The following table summarizes the contractual amounts and carrying values of off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments at September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018. 2019. The amounts in the table below for credit card, and home equity and certain scored business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these products will be utilized at the same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel credit card and certain scored business banking lines of credit by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases as permitted by law, without notice. In addition, the Firm typically closes credit card lines when the borrower is 60 days or more past due. The Firm may reduce or close HELOCs when there are significant decreases in the value of the underlying property, or when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower.
In conjunction with the adoption of CECL, the Firm reclassified risk-rated loans and lending-related commitments from the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment to the wholesale portfolio segment, to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Refer to Note 1 for further information.
| | Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments | Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments |
| Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments |
|
| Contractual amount |
| Carrying value(g) | Contractual amount |
| Carrying value(i) |
| September 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
|
| Sep 30, 2019 |
| Dec 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 |
|
| Mar 31, 2020 |
| Dec 31, 2019 |
|
By remaining maturity (in millions) | Expires in 1 year or less | Expires after 1 year through 3 years | Expires after 3 years through 5 years | Expires after 5 years | Total |
| Total |
|
| Expires in 1 year or less | Expires after 1 year through 3 years | Expires after 3 years through 5 years | Expires after 5 years | Total |
|
|
Lending-related | | | | | | | | |
Consumer, excluding credit card: | | | | | | | | |
Home equity | $ | 597 |
| $ | 1,156 |
| $ | 2,353 |
| $ | 17,077 |
| $ | 21,183 |
| | $ | 20,901 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | 12 |
| |
Residential mortgage(a) | 10,904 |
| — |
| — |
| 12 |
| 10,916 |
| | 5,481 |
| | — |
| — |
| |
Auto | 8,062 |
| 1,238 |
| 118 |
| 49 |
| 9,467 |
| | 8,011 |
| | 2 |
| 2 |
| |
Consumer & Business Banking | 10,324 |
| 643 |
| 106 |
| 952 |
| 12,025 |
| | 11,673 |
| | 19 |
| 19 |
| |
Residential real estate(a) | | $ | 13,109 |
| $ | 1,194 |
| $ | 2,743 |
| $ | 16,279 |
| $ | 33,325 |
| $ | 30,217 |
| | $ | 150 |
| $ | 12 |
|
Auto and other | | 7,549 |
| 1 |
| 39 |
| 621 |
| 8,210 |
| 9,952 |
| | 1 |
| — |
|
Total consumer, excluding credit card | 29,887 |
| 3,037 |
| 2,577 |
| 18,090 |
| 53,591 |
| | 46,066 |
| | 33 |
| 33 |
| 20,658 |
| 1,195 |
| 2,782 |
| 16,900 |
| 41,535 |
| 40,169 |
| | 151 |
| 12 |
|
Credit card | 645,880 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 645,880 |
| | 605,379 |
| | — |
| — |
| |
Total consumer(b) | 675,767 |
| 3,037 |
| 2,577 |
| 18,090 |
| 699,471 |
| | 651,445 |
| | 33 |
| 33 |
| |
Credit card(b) | | 681,442 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 681,442 |
| 650,720 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Total consumer(b)(c) | | 702,100 |
| 1,195 |
| 2,782 |
| 16,900 |
| 722,977 |
| 690,889 |
| | 151 |
| 12 |
|
Wholesale: | | | | | | | | |
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(c) | 55,258 |
| 128,911 |
| 161,963 |
| 11,200 |
| 357,332 |
| | 351,490 |
| | 912 |
| 852 |
| |
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees(c) | 16,373 |
| 10,525 |
| 5,349 |
| 1,842 |
| 34,089 |
| | 33,498 |
| | 605 |
| 521 |
| |
Other letters of credit(c) | 3,853 |
| 305 |
| 40 |
| — |
| 4,198 |
| | 2,825 |
| | 5 |
| 3 |
| |
Total wholesale(b) | 75,484 |
| 139,741 |
| 167,352 |
| 13,042 |
| 395,619 |
| | 387,813 |
| | 1,522 |
| 1,376 |
| |
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(d) | | 73,560 |
| 107,538 |
| 131,902 |
| 10,383 |
| 323,383 |
| 376,107 |
| | 2,708 |
| 959 |
|
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees(d) | | 15,527 |
| 9,944 |
| 4,630 |
| 1,720 |
| 31,821 |
| 34,242 |
| | 434 |
| 618 |
|
Other letters of credit(d) | | 3,122 |
| 128 |
| 31 |
| — |
| 3,281 |
| 2,961 |
| | 8 |
| 4 |
|
Total wholesale(c) | | 92,209 |
| 117,610 |
| 136,563 |
| 12,103 |
| 358,485 |
| 413,310 |
| | 3,150 |
| 1,581 |
|
Total lending-related | $ | 751,251 |
| $ | 142,778 |
| $ | 169,929 |
| $ | 31,132 |
| $ | 1,095,090 |
| | $ | 1,039,258 |
| | $ | 1,555 |
| $ | 1,409 |
| $ | 794,309 |
| $ | 118,805 |
| $ | 139,345 |
| $ | 29,003 |
| $ | 1,081,462 |
| $ | 1,104,199 |
| | $ | 3,301 |
| $ | 1,593 |
|
Other guarantees and commitments | | | | | | | | |
Securities lending indemnification agreements and guarantees(d) | $ | 214,338 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 214,338 |
| | $ | 186,077 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| |
Securities lending indemnification agreements and guarantees(e) | | $ | 215,875 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 215,875 |
| $ | 204,827 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees | 1,772 |
| 196 |
| 12,081 |
| 40,369 |
| 54,418 |
| | 55,271 |
| | 231 |
| 367 |
| 1,242 |
| 118 |
| 10,899 |
| 40,365 |
| 52,624 |
| 53,089 |
| | 661 |
| 159 |
|
Unsettled resale and securities borrowed agreements | 122,946 |
| 1,125 |
| 66 |
| — |
| 124,137 |
| | 102,008 |
| | — |
| — |
| 137,948 |
| 901 |
| — |
| — |
| 138,849 |
| 117,951 |
| | 30 |
| — |
|
Unsettled repurchase and securities loaned agreements | 120,679 |
| 670 |
| — |
| — |
| 121,349 |
| | 57,732 |
| | — |
| — |
| 107,979 |
| 707 |
| — |
| — |
| 108,686 |
| 73,351 |
| | 7 |
| — |
|
Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications: | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage repurchase liability | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | 61 |
| 89 |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 84 |
| 59 |
|
Loans sold with recourse | NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 1,001 |
| | 1,019 |
| | 27 |
| 30 |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 932 |
| 944 |
| | 28 |
| 27 |
|
Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments(e) | 161,580 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 161,580 |
| | 58,960 |
| | — |
| — |
| |
Other guarantees and commitments(f) | 4,098 |
| 590 |
| 260 |
| 2,832 |
| 7,780 |
| | 8,183 |
| | (89 | ) | (73 | ) | |
Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments(f) | | 177,587 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 177,587 |
| 206,432 |
| | — |
| — |
|
Other guarantees and commitments(g) | | 4,861 |
| 1,123 |
| 272 |
| 3,026 |
| 9,282 |
| 9,083 |
| (h) | (83 | ) | (73 | ) |
| |
(a) | Includes certain commitments to purchase loans from correspondents. |
| |
(b) | Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CB and CIB. |
| |
(c) | Predominantly all consumer and wholesale lending-related commitments are in the U.S. |
| |
(c)(d) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, reflected the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $198$88 million and $282$76 million, respectively, for other unfunded commitments to extend credit; $9.7$9.3 billion and $10.4$9.8 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $705$267 million and $385$546 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations. |
| |
(d)(e) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was $226.5$229.4 billion and $195.6$216.2 billion, respectively. Securities lending collateral primarily consists of cash, G7 government securities, and securities issued by U.S. GSEs and government agencies. |
| |
(e)(f) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, includes guarantees to the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation under the sponsored member repo program and commitments and guarantees associated with the Firm’s membership in certain clearing houses. |
| |
(f)(g) | At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, primarily includes letters of credit hedged by derivative transactions and managed on a market risk basis, and unfunded commitments related to institutional lending. Additionally, includes unfunded commitments predominantly related to certain tax-oriented equity investments. |
| |
(g)(h) | The prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation. |
| |
(i) | For lending-related products, the carrying value represents the allowance for lending-related commitments and the guarantee liability; for derivative-related products, and lending-related commitments for which the fair value option was elected, the carrying value represents the fair value. At March 31, 2020, includes markdowns on held-for-sale positions related to unfunded commitments in the bridge financing portfolio. |
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit generally consist of commitments for working capital and general corporate purposes, extensions of credit to support commercial paper facilities and bond financings in the event that those obligations cannot be remarketed to new investors, as well as committed liquidity facilities to clearing organizations. The Firm also issues commitments under multipurpose facilities which could be drawn upon in several forms, including the issuance of a standby letter of credit.
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are conditional lending commitments issued by the Firm to guarantee the performance of a client or customer to a third party under certain arrangements, such as commercial paper facilities, bond financings, acquisition financings, trade and similar transactions.
The following table summarizes the contractual amount and carrying value of standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees and other letters of credit arrangements as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
Standby letters of credit, other financial guarantees and other letters of credit
| | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
(in millions) | Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees | | Other letters of credit | | Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees | | Other letters of credit | Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees | | Other letters of credit | | Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees | | Other letters of credit |
Investment-grade(a) | $ | 27,131 |
| | $ | 3,249 |
| | $ | 26,420 |
| | $ | 2,079 |
| $ | 24,642 |
| | $ | 2,454 |
| | $ | 26,880 |
| | $ | 2,137 |
|
Noninvestment-grade(a) | 6,958 |
| | 949 |
| | 7,078 |
| | 746 |
| 7,179 |
| | 827 |
| | 7,362 |
| | 824 |
|
Total contractual amount | $ | 34,089 |
| | $ | 4,198 |
| | $ | 33,498 |
| | $ | 2,825 |
| $ | 31,821 |
| | $ | 3,281 |
| | $ | 34,242 |
| | $ | 2,961 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for lending-related commitments | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | 55 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 216 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
Guarantee liability | 390 |
| | — |
| | 354 |
| | — |
| 379 |
| | — |
| | 402 |
| | — |
|
Total carrying value | $ | 605 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 521 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | 434 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 618 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments with collateral | $ | 17,690 |
| | $ | 877 |
| | $ | 17,400 |
| | $ | 583 |
| $ | 17,006 |
| | $ | 710 |
| | $ | 17,853 |
| | $ | 728 |
|
| |
(a) | The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings which generally correspondrisk ratings. Refer to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.Note 12 for further information on internal risk ratings. |
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees
The Firm transacts in certain derivative contracts that have the characteristics of a guarantee under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Note 2728 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information on these derivatives.
The following table summarizes the derivatives qualifying as guarantees as of September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018.2019.
| | (in millions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Notional amounts | | | | | | |
Derivative guarantees | $ | 54,418 |
| | $ | 55,271 |
| $ | 52,624 |
| | $ | 53,089 |
|
Stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure | 28,886 |
| | 28,637 |
| 28,984 |
| | 28,877 |
|
Maximum exposure of stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure | 2,960 |
| | 2,963 |
| 2,977 |
| | 2,967 |
|
| | | | | | |
Fair value | | | | | | |
Derivative payables | 231 |
| | 367 |
| 661 |
| | 159 |
|
Derivative receivables | — |
| | — |
| |
In addition to derivative contracts that meet the characteristics of a guarantee, the Firm is both a purchaser and seller of credit protection in the credit derivatives market. Refer to Note 45 for a further discussion of credit derivatives.
Merchant charge-backs
Under the rules of payment networks, the Firm, in its role as a merchant acquirer, retains a contingent liability for disputed processed credit and debit card transactions that result in a charge-back to the merchant. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, Merchant Services will (through the cardholder’s issuing bank) credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and will charge back the transaction to the merchant. If Merchant Services is unable to collect the amount from the merchant, Merchant Services will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. Merchant Services mitigates this risk by withholding future settlements, retaining cash reserve accounts or obtaining other collateral. In addition, Merchant Services recognizes a valuation allowance that covers the payment or performance risk to the Firm related to charge-backs. The carrying value of the valuation allowance was $74 million and $11 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications
In connection with the Firm’s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with GSEs the Firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements, and that may require the Firm to repurchase mortgage loans and/or indemnify the loan purchaser if such representations and warranties are breached by the Firm. Further, although the Firm’s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse, the Firm does provide recourse servicing in certain limited cases where it agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans. Refer to Note 2728 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.
The liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the Firm in establishing its litigation reserves. Refer to Note 2425 of this Form 10-Q and Note 2930 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information regarding litigation.
Sponsored member repo program
In 2018 the Firm commenced the sponsored member repo program, wherein theThe Firm acts as a sponsoring member to clear eligible overnight resale and repurchase agreements through the Government Securities Division of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) on behalf of clients that become sponsored members under the FICC’s rules. The Firm also guarantees to the FICC the prompt and full payment and performance of its sponsored member clients’ respective obligations under the FICC’s rules. The Firm minimizes its liability under these overnight guarantees by obtaining a security interest in the cash or high-quality securities collateral that the clients place with the clearing house therefore the Firm expects the risk of loss to be remote. The Firm’s maximum possible exposure, without taking into consideration the associated collateral, is included in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line on page 157.162. Refer to Note 11 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on credit risk mitigation practices on resale agreements and the types of collateral pledged under repurchase agreements.
Guarantees of subsidiaries
The Parent Company has guaranteed certain long-term debt and structured notes of its subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (“JPMFC”), a 100%-owned finance subsidiary. All securities issued by JPMFC are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent Company. These guarantees, which rank on a parity with the Firm’s unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, are not included in the table on page 157162 of this Note. Refer to Note 1920 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information.
Note 2324 – Pledged assets and collateral
Refer to Note 2829 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Firm’s pledged assets and collateral.
Pledged assets
The Firm may pledgepledges financial assets that it owns to maintain potential borrowing capacity at discount windows with Federal Reserve banks, various other central banks and FHLBs. Additionally, pledgedthe Firm pledges assets are used for other purposes, including to collateralize repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. Certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by the secured parties and are parenthetically identified on the Consolidated balance sheets as assets pledged.
The following table presents the Firm’s pledged assets.
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
Assets that may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties | $ | 154.2 |
| | $ | 104.0 |
|
Assets that may not be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties | 94.5 |
| | 83.7 |
|
Assets pledged at Federal Reserve banks and FHLBs | 487.1 |
| | 475.3 |
|
Total assets pledged | $ | 735.8 |
| | $ | 663.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions) | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Assets that may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties | $ | 164.6 |
| | $ | 125.2 |
|
Assets that may not be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties | 111.6 |
| | 80.2 |
|
Assets pledged at Federal Reserve banks and FHLBs(a) | 507.3 |
| | 478.9 |
|
Total pledged assets | $ | 783.5 |
| | $ | 684.3 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes assets pledged to the Federal Reserve under the MMLF, PDCF and the Federal Reserve’s open market operations. |
Total pledged assets pledged do not include assets of consolidated VIEs; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. Refer to Note 1314 for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. Refer to Note 1011 for additional information on the Firm’s securities financing activities. Refer to Note 1920 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on the Firm’s long-term debt.
Collateral
The Firm accepts financial assets as collateral that it is permitted to sell or repledge, deliver or otherwise use. This collateral is generally obtained under resale and other securities financing agreements, prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and derivative contracts. Collateral is generally used under repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits.
The following table presents the fair value of collateral accepted.
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions) | September 30, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
Collateral permitted to be sold or repledged, delivered, or otherwise used | $ | 1,264.1 |
| | $ | 1,245.3 |
|
Collateral sold, repledged, delivered or otherwise used | 1,017.3 |
| | 998.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
(in billions) | March 31, 2020 |
| | December 31, 2019 |
|
Collateral permitted to be sold or repledged, delivered, or otherwise used | $ | 1,373.7 |
| | $ | 1,282.5 |
|
Collateral sold, repledged, delivered or otherwise used(a) | 1,058.3 |
| | 1,000.5 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes collateral repledged to the Federal Reserve under the Federal Reserve’s open market operations and PDCF. |
Note 2425 – Litigation
Contingencies
As of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, the Firm and its subsidiaries and affiliates are defendants, putative defendants or respondents in numerous legal proceedings, including private, civil litigations and regulatory/government investigations. The litigations range from individual actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members. Investigations involve both formal and informal proceedings, by both governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. These legal proceedings are at varying stages of adjudication, arbitration or investigation, and involve each of the Firm’s lines of business and several geographies and a wide variety of claims (including common law tort and contract claims and statutory antitrust, securities and consumer protection claims), some of which present novel legal theories.
The Firm believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves established, for its legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $1.3 billion at September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. This estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses was based upon information available as of that date for those proceedings in which the Firm believes that an estimate of reasonably possible loss can be made. For certain matters, the Firm does not believe that such an estimate can be made, as of that date. The Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses involves significant judgment, given:
the number, variety and varying stages of the proceedings, including the fact that many are in preliminary stages,
the existence in many such proceedings of multiple defendants, including the Firm, whose share of liability (if any) has yet to be determined,
the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, including issues regarding class certification and the scope of many of the claims, and
the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings, including where the Firm has made assumptions concerning future rulings by the court or other adjudicator, or about the behavior or incentives of adverse parties or regulatory authorities, and those assumptions prove to be incorrect.
In addition, the outcome of a particular proceeding may be a result which the Firm did not take into account in its estimate because the Firm had deemed the likelihood of that outcome to be remote. Accordingly, the Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses will change from time to time, and actual losses may vary significantly.
Set forth below are descriptions of the Firm’s material legal proceedings.
Federal Republic of Nigeria Litigation. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. operated an escrow and depository account for the Federal Government of Nigeria (“FGN”) and two major international oil companies. The account held approximately $1.1 billion in connection with a dispute among the clients over rights to an oil field. Following the settlement of the dispute, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. paid out the monies in the account in 2011 and 2013 in accordance with directions received from its clients. In November 2017, the Federal Republic of Nigeria (“FRN”) commenced a claim in the English High Court for approximately $875 million in payments made out of the accounts. The FRN, claiming to be the same entity as the FGN, alleges that the payments were instructed as part of a complex fraud not involving JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., but that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. was or should have been on notice that the payments may be fraudulent. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. applied for summary judgment and was unsuccessful. The claim is ongoing and no trial date has been set.
Foreign Exchange Investigations and Litigation. The Firm previously reported settlements with certain government authorities relating to its foreign exchange (“FX”) sales and trading activities and controls related to those activities. FX-related investigations and inquiries by government authorities, including competition authorities, are ongoing, and the Firm is cooperating with and working to resolveAmong those matters. Inresolutions, in May 2015, the Firm pleaded guilty to a single violation of federal antitrust law. In January 2017, the Firm was sentenced, with judgment entered thereafter and a term of probation ending in January 2020. The term of probation has concluded, with the Firm remaining in good standing throughout the probation period. The Department of Labor has granted the Firm a five-year exemption of disqualification that allows the Firm and its affiliates to continue to rely on the Qualified Professional Asset Manager exemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) until January 2023. The Firm will need to reapply in due course for a further exemption to cover the remainder of the ten-year disqualification period. In addition, the Firm has paid fines totaling approximately $265 million in connection with the settlement of FX-related investigations conducted by the European Commission and the SwissA South Africa Competition Commission which were announced in May 2019matter is the remaining FX-related governmental inquiry, and June 2019, respectively. Separately, in February 2017is currently pending before the South Africa Competition Commission referred its FX investigation of the Firm and other banks to the South Africa Competition Tribunal, which is conducting civil proceedings concerning that matter.Tribunal.
In August 2018, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted final approval to the Firm’s settlement of a consolidated class action brought by U.S.-based plaintiffs, which principally alleged violations of
federal antitrust laws based on an alleged conspiracy to manipulate foreign exchange rates and also sought damages on behalf of persons who transacted in FX futures and options on futures. Certain members of the settlement class filed requests to the Court to be excluded from the class, and certain of them filed a complaint against the Firm and a number of other foreign exchange dealers in
November 2018 (the “opt-out action”). The 2 FX-related2018. A number of these actions brought by participants or beneficiaries of qualified ERISA plansremain pending. Further, putative class actions have been dismissed. Putative class actionsfiled against the Firm and a number of other foreign exchange dealers on behalf of certain consumers who purchased foreign currencies at allegedly inflated rates (the “consumer action”) and purported indirect purchasers of FX instruments (the “indirect purchaser action”)instruments; these actions also remain pending in the District Court. In January 2020, the Firm and 11 other defendants agreed in principle to settle the class action filed by purported indirect purchasers for a total of $10 million. That settlement remains subject to negotiation of final documentation and court approval. In addition, some FX relatedFX-related individual and putative class actions based on similar alleged underlying conduct have been filed outside the U.S., including in the U.K., Israel and Australia, which are based on similar alleged underlying conduct.Australia.
Interchange Litigation. GA grouproups of merchants and retail associations filed a series of class action complaints alleging that Visa and Mastercard, as well as certain banks, conspired to set the price of credit and debit card interchange fees and enacted respectiverelated rules in violation of antitrust laws. TheIn 2012, the parties initially settled the cases for a cash payment, a temporary reduction of credit card interchange, and modifications to certain credit card network rules. In December 2013, the District Court granted final approval of the settlement.
A number of merchants appealed the settlement to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which, in June 2016, vacated the District Court’s certification of the class action and reversed2017, after the approval of that settlement was reversed on appeal, the class settlement. In March 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court declined petitions seeking review of the decision of the Court of Appeals. The case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the appellate decision.
The original class action was divided into 2 separate actions, one seeking primarily monetary relief and the other seeking primarily injunctive relief. In September 2018, the parties to the class action seeking monetary relief finalized an agreement which amends and supersedes the prior settlement agreement, and the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking preliminary approval of the modified settlement.agreement. Pursuant to this settlement, the defendants have collectively contributed an additional $900 million to the approximately $5.3 billion previously held in escrow from the original settlement. In JanuaryDecember 2019, the amended agreement was preliminarily approved by the District Court, and formal noticeCourt. Certain merchants filed notices of appeal of the District Court’s approval order. Based on the percentage of merchants that opted out of the amended class settlement, $700 million has been completedreturned to the defendants from the settlementescrow in accordance with the District Court’s order. A fairness hearing is scheduled before the District Court in November 2019.settlement agreement. The class action seeking primarily injunctive relief continues separately.
In addition, certain merchants have filed individual actions raising similar allegations against Visa and Mastercard, as well as against the Firm and other banks, and some of those actions are proceeding.remain pending.
LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rate Investigations and Litigation. JPMorgan Chase has received subpoenas and requests for documents and, in some cases, interviews,responded to inquiries from federal and statevarious governmental agencies and entities including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and various state attorneys general, as well as the European Commission (“EC”), the Swiss Competition Commission (“ComCo”) and other regulatory authorities and banking associations around the world relating primarily to the process by which interest rates were submitted to the British Bankers Association (“BBA”) in connection with the setting of the BBA’sAssociation’s London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for various currencies principally in 2007 and 2008. Some of the inquiries also relate to similar processes by which information on rates was submitted to the European Banking Federation (“EBF”) in connection with the setting of the EBF’sFederation’s Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”). The Firm continues to cooperate with these investigations to the extent that they are ongoing. ComCo’sSwiss Competition Commission’s investigation relating to EURIBOR, to which
the Firm and other banks are subject, continues. In December 2016, the ECEuropean Commission issued a decision against the Firm and other banks finding an infringement of European antitrust rules relating to EURIBOR. The Firm has filed an appeal of that decision with the European General Court, and that appeal is pending.
In addition, the Firm has been named as a defendant along with other banks in a series of individual and putative class actions related to benchmarks, including U.S. dollar LIBOR during the period that it was administered by the BBA and, in a separate consolidated putative class action, during the period that it was administered by ICE Benchmark Administration. These actions have been filed, or consolidated for pre-trial purposes, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In these actions, plaintiffs make varying allegations that in various periods, starting in 2000 or later, defendants either individually or collectively manipulated various benchmark rates by submitting rates that were artificially low or high. Plaintiffs allege that they transacted in loans, derivatives or other financial instruments whose values are affected by changes in these rates and assert a variety of claims including antitrust claims seeking treble damages. These actions are in various stages of litigation.
In actions related to U.S. dollar LIBOR during the period that it was administered by the BBA, the District Court dismissed certain claims, including antitrust claims brought by some plaintiffs whom the District Court found did not have standing to assert such claims, and permitted certain claims to proceed, including antitrust, Commodity Exchange Act, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and common law claims. The plaintiffs whose antitrust claims were dismissed for lack of standing have filed an appeal. The District Court granted class certification of antitrust claims related to bonds and interest rate swaps sold directly by the defendants and denied class certification motions filed by other plaintiffs. The Firm has agreed to settleIn the consolidated putative class
action related to the time period that U.S. dollar LIBOR was administered by ICE Benchmark Administration, the District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, and the plaintiffs have appealed. The Firm’s settlements of putative class actions related to Swiss franc LIBOR, the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate and the Singapore Swap Offer Rate and(“SIBOR”), the Australian Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate, as well asand certain of the putative class actions related to U.S. dollar LIBOR. TheLIBOR remain subject to court approval. In the class actions related to SIBOR and Swiss franc LIBOR, the District Court declined to grant preliminary approval to the settlement involving the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate and the Singapore Swap Offer Rate and instead dismissed the litigation after concludingconcluded that the plaintiffCourt lacked standing. Plaintiff’s appealsubject matter jurisdiction, and plaintiffs’ appeals of the District Court’s decision isthose decisions are pending. The remaining settlements are all subject to further documentation and court approval.
Metals and U.S. Treasuries Investigations and Litigation.Litigation and Related Inquiries. Various authorities, including the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, are conducting investigations relating to trading practices in the metals markets and related conduct. The Firm also is responding to and cooperatingrelated requests concerning similar trading-practices issues in markets for other financial instruments, such as U.S.
Treasuries. The Firm continues to cooperate with these investigations and is currently engaged in discussions with various regulators about resolving their respective investigations. There is no assurance that such discussions will result in settlements. Several putative class action complaints have been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Firm and certain former employees, alleging a precious metals futures and options price manipulation scheme in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. Some of the complaints also allege unjust enrichment and deceptive acts or practices under the General Business Law of the State of New York. The Court consolidated these putative class actions in February 2019. The Firm is also a defendant in a consolidated action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging monopolization of silver futures in violation of the Sherman Act.
Wendel. Since 2012, the French criminal authorities have been investigating a series of transactions entered into by senior managers of Wendel Investissement (“Wendel”) during the period from 2004 through 2007 to restructure their shareholdings in Wendel. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Paris branch provided financing for the transactions to a number of managers of Wendel in 2007. JPMorgan Chase has cooperated with the investigation. The investigating judges issued an ordonnance de renvoi in November 2016, referring JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to the French tribunal correctionnel for alleged complicity in tax fraud. No date for trial has been set by the court. In January 2018, the Paris Court of Appeal issued a decision cancelling the mise en examen of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. In September 2018, theThe Court of Cassation, France’s highest court, ruled in September 2018 that a mise en examen is a prerequisite for an ordonnance de renvoi and remandedin January 2020 ordered the case to the Courtannulment of Appeal. In June 2019, the Court of Appeal declined to annul the ordonnance de renvoi referring JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to the French tribunal correctionnelcorrectionnel., and the Firm has reapplied to the Court of Cassation for a determination as to whether the Court of Appeal’s decision is consistent with the Court of Cassation’s September 2018 ruling. Any further actions in the criminal proceedings are stayed pending the outcome of that application. In addition, a number of the managers have commenced civil proceedings against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The claims are separate, involve
different allegations and are at various stages of proceedings.
* * *
In addition to the various legal proceedings discussed above, JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries are named as defendants or are otherwise involved in a substantial number of other legal proceedings. The Firm believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and it intends to defend itself vigorously. Additional legal proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future.
The Firm has established reserves for several hundred of its currently outstanding legal proceedings. In accordance with the provisions of U.S. GAAP for contingencies, the Firm accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Firm evaluates its outstanding legal proceedings each quarter to assess its litigation reserves, and makes adjustments in such reserves, upwards or downward, as appropriate, based on management’s best judgment after consultation with counsel. The Firm’s legal expense/(benefit) was $10$197 million and $20$(81) million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and $(2) million and $90 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There is no assurance that the Firm’s litigation reserves will not need to be adjusted in the future.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the matters present novel legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm cannot state with confidence what will be the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters, the timing of their ultimate resolution or the eventual losses, fines, penalties or consequences related to those matters. JPMorgan Chase believes, based upon its current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, consideration of the material legal proceedings described above and after taking into account its current litigation reserves and its estimated aggregate range of possible losses, that the other legal proceedings currently pending against it should not have a material adverse effect on the Firm’s consolidated financial condition. The Firm notes, however, that in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves it has currently accrued or that a matter will not have material reputational consequences. As a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to JPMorgan Chase’s operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorgan Chase’s income for that period.
Note 2526 – Business segments
The Firm is managed on a line of businessan LOB basis. There are 4 major reportable business segments - Consumer & Community Banking, Corporate & Investment Bank, Commercial Banking and Asset & Wealth Management. In addition, there is a Corporate segment. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Segment results below, and Note 3132 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a further discussion concerning JPMorgan Chase’s business segments.
Segment results
The following tables provide a summary of the Firm’s segment results as of or for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts with the
reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm (and each of the reportable business segments) on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. Refer to Note 3132 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on the Firm’s managed basis.
Business segment capital allocation
The amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity. On at least an annual basis,Periodically, the assumptions and methodologies used into allocate capital allocation are assessed and as a result, the capital allocated to lines of businessthe LOBs may change. Refer to Line of business equity on page 9190 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for additional information on business segment capital allocation.
Business segment changes
In the first quarter of 2020, the Firm began reporting a Wholesale Payments business unit within CIB following a realignment of the Firm’s wholesale payments businesses. The Wholesale Payments business comprises:
Merchant Services, which was realigned from CCB to CIB
Treasury Services and Trade Finance in CIB. Trade Finance was previously reported in Lending in CIB.
In connection with the alignment of Wholesale Payments, the assets, liabilities and headcount associated with the Merchant Services business were realigned to CIB from CCB, and the revenue and expenses of the Merchant Services business is reported across CCB, CIB and CB based primarily on client relationships. Prior periods have been revised to reflect this realignment and revised allocation methodology.
| | Segment results and reconciliation(a) | Segment results and reconciliation(a) | Segment results and reconciliation(a) |
As of or for the three months ended September 30, (in millions, except ratios) | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking | | Asset & Wealth Management | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
As of or for the three months ended March 31, (in millions, except ratios) | | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking | | Asset & Wealth Management |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Noninterest revenue | $ | 5,095 |
| $ | 4,176 |
| | $ | 7,182 |
| $ | 6,505 |
| | $ | 599 |
| $ | 576 |
| | $ | 2,713 |
| $ | 2,680 |
| $ | 4,018 |
| $ | 4,085 |
| | $ | 6,841 |
| $ | 7,836 |
| | $ | 621 |
| $ | 733 |
| | $ | 2,709 |
| $ | 2,593 |
|
Net interest income | 9,164 |
| 9,114 |
| | 2,156 |
| 2,300 |
| | 1,608 |
| 1,695 |
| | 855 |
| 879 |
| 9,153 |
| 9,405 |
| | 3,107 |
| 2,198 |
| | 1,557 |
| 1,680 |
| | 897 |
| 896 |
|
Total net revenue | 14,259 |
| 13,290 |
| | 9,338 |
| 8,805 |
| | 2,207 |
| 2,271 |
| | 3,568 |
| 3,559 |
| 13,171 |
| 13,490 |
| | 9,948 |
| 10,034 |
| | 2,178 |
| 2,413 |
| | 3,606 |
| 3,489 |
|
Provision for credit losses | 1,311 |
| 980 |
| | 92 |
| (42 | ) | | 67 |
| (15 | ) | | 44 |
| 23 |
| 5,772 |
| 1,314 |
| | 1,401 |
| 87 |
| | 1,010 |
| 90 |
| | 94 |
| 2 |
|
Noninterest expense | 7,290 |
| 6,982 |
| | 5,348 |
| 5,175 |
| | 881 |
| 853 |
| | 2,622 |
| 2,585 |
| 7,161 |
| 6,970 |
| | 5,896 |
| 5,629 |
| | 988 |
| 938 |
| | 2,659 |
| 2,647 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 5,658 |
| 5,328 |
| | 3,898 |
| 3,672 |
| | 1,259 |
| 1,433 |
| | 902 |
| 951 |
| 238 |
| 5,206 |
| | 2,651 |
| 4,318 |
| | 180 |
| 1,385 |
| | 853 |
| 840 |
|
Income tax expense | 1,385 |
| 1,242 |
| | 1,089 |
| 1,046 |
| | 322 |
| 344 |
| | 234 |
| 227 |
| 47 |
| 1,259 |
| | 663 |
| 1,058 |
| | 33 |
| 325 |
| | 189 |
| 179 |
|
Net income | $ | 4,273 |
| $ | 4,086 |
| | $ | 2,809 |
| $ | 2,626 |
| | $ | 937 |
| $ | 1,089 |
| | $ | 668 |
| $ | 724 |
| $ | 191 |
| $ | 3,947 |
| | $ | 1,988 |
| $ | 3,260 |
| | $ | 147 |
| $ | 1,060 |
| | $ | 664 |
| $ | 661 |
|
Average equity | $ | 52,000 |
| $ | 51,000 |
| | $ | 80,000 |
| $ | 70,000 |
| | $ | 22,000 |
| $ | 20,000 |
| | $ | 10,500 |
| $ | 9,000 |
| $ | 52,000 |
| $ | 52,000 |
| | $ | 80,000 |
| $ | 80,000 |
| | $ | 22,000 |
| $ | 22,000 |
| | $ | 10,500 |
| $ | 10,500 |
|
Total assets | 532,487 |
| 560,432 |
| | 1,023,132 |
| 928,148 |
| | 222,483 |
| 217,194 |
| | 174,226 |
| 166,716 |
| 506,147 |
| 539,127 |
| | 1,217,459 |
| 1,019,470 |
| | 247,786 |
| 216,111 |
| | 186,102 |
| 165,865 |
|
ROE | 32 | % | 31 | % | | 13 | % | 14 | % | | 16 | % | 21 | % | | 24 | % | 31 | % | 1 | % | 30 | % | | 9 | % | 16 | % | | 2 | % | 19 | % | | 25 | % | 25 | % |
Overhead ratio | 51 |
| 53 |
| | 57 |
| 59 |
| | 40 |
| 38 |
| | 73 |
| 73 |
| 54 |
| 52 |
| | 59 |
| 56 |
| | 45 |
| 39 |
| | 74 |
| 76 |
|
| | As of or for the three months ended September 30, (in millions, except ratios) | Corporate | | Reconciling Items(a) | | Total | |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |
As of or for the three months ended March 31, (in millions, except ratios) | | Corporate | | Reconciling Items(a) | | Total |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
Noninterest revenue | $ | 120 |
| $ | (177 | ) | | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (408 | ) | | $ | 15,113 |
| $ | 13,352 |
| $ | 331 |
| $ | 8 |
| | $ | (708 | ) | $ | (585 | ) | | $ | 13,812 |
| $ | 14,670 |
|
Net interest income | 572 |
| 74 |
| | (127 | ) | (154 | ) | | 14,228 |
| 13,908 |
| (165 | ) | 417 |
| | (110 | ) | (143 | ) | | 14,439 |
| 14,453 |
|
Total net revenue | 692 |
| (103 | ) | | (723 | ) | (562 | ) | | 29,341 |
| 27,260 |
| 166 |
| 425 |
| | (818 | ) | (728 | ) | | 28,251 |
| 29,123 |
|
Provision for credit losses | — |
| 2 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 1,514 |
| 948 |
| 8 |
| 2 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 8,285 |
| 1,495 |
|
Noninterest expense | 281 |
| 28 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 16,422 |
| 15,623 |
| 146 |
| 211 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 16,850 |
| 16,395 |
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) | 411 |
| (133 | ) | | (723 | ) | (562 | ) | | 11,405 |
| 10,689 |
| 12 |
| 212 |
| | (818 | ) | (728 | ) | | 3,116 |
| 11,233 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) | 18 |
| 12 |
| | (723 | ) | (562 | ) | | 2,325 |
| 2,309 |
| 137 |
| (39 | ) | | (818 | ) | (728 | ) | | 251 |
| 2,054 |
|
Net income/(loss) | $ | 393 |
| $ | (145 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 9,080 |
| $ | 8,380 |
| $ | (125 | ) | $ | 251 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2,865 |
| $ | 9,179 |
|
Average equity | $ | 71,113 |
| $ | 80,439 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 235,613 |
| $ | 230,439 |
| $ | 70,030 |
| $ | 65,551 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 234,530 |
| $ | 230,051 |
|
Total assets | 812,333 |
| 742,693 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | 2,764,661 |
| 2,615,183 |
| 981,937 |
| 796,615 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | 3,139,431 |
| 2,737,188 |
|
ROE | NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 15 | % | 14 | % | NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 4 | % | 16 | % |
Overhead ratio | NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 56 |
| 57 |
| NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 60 |
| 56 |
|
| |
(a) | Segment managed results reflect revenue on an FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment results and reconciliation(a) |
As of or for the nine months ended September 30, (in millions, except ratios) | Consumer & Community Banking | | Corporate & Investment Bank | | Commercial Banking | | Asset & Wealth Management |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Noninterest revenue | $ | 13,868 |
| $ | 12,063 |
| | $ | 22,328 |
| $ | 21,954 |
| | $ | 1,806 |
| $ | 1,758 |
| | $ | 7,989 |
| $ | 7,997 |
|
Net interest income | 27,975 |
| 26,321 |
| | 6,499 |
| 7,257 |
| | 4,950 |
| 4,995 |
| | 2,627 |
| 2,640 |
|
Total net revenue | 41,843 |
| 38,384 |
| | 28,827 |
| 29,211 |
| | 6,756 |
| 6,753 |
| | 10,616 |
| 10,637 |
|
Provision for credit losses | 3,745 |
| 3,405 |
| | 179 |
| (142 | ) | | 186 |
| 23 |
| | 48 |
| 40 |
|
Noninterest expense | 21,663 |
| 20,770 |
| | 16,288 |
| 16,237 |
| | 2,618 |
| 2,541 |
| | 7,865 |
| 7,732 |
|
Income before income tax expense | 16,435 |
| 14,209 |
| | 12,360 |
| 13,116 |
| | 3,952 |
| 4,189 |
| | 2,703 |
| 2,865 |
|
Income tax expense | 4,025 |
| 3,385 |
| | 3,365 |
| 3,318 |
| | 966 |
| 988 |
| | 655 |
| 616 |
|
Net income | $ | 12,410 |
| $ | 10,824 |
| | $ | 8,995 |
| $ | 9,798 |
| | $ | 2,986 |
| $ | 3,201 |
| | $ | 2,048 |
| $ | 2,249 |
|
Average equity | $ | 52,000 |
| $ | 51,000 |
| | $ | 80,000 |
| $ | 70,000 |
| | $ | 22,000 |
| $ | 20,000 |
| | $ | 10,500 |
| $ | 9,000 |
|
Total assets | 532,487 |
| 560,432 |
| | 1,023,132 |
| 928,148 |
| | 222,483 |
| 217,194 |
| | 174,226 |
| 166,716 |
|
Return on equity | 31 | % | 27 | % | | 14 | % | 18 | % | | 17 | % | 20 | % | | 25 | % | 32 | % |
Overhead ratio | 52 |
| 54 |
| | 57 |
| 56 |
| | 39 |
| 38 |
| | 74 |
| 73 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of or for the nine months ended September 30, (in millions, except ratios) | Corporate | | Reconciling Items(a) | | Total |
2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Noninterest revenue | $ | 3 |
| $ | (220 | ) | | $ | (1,777 | ) | $ | (1,337 | ) | | $ | 44,217 |
| $ | 42,215 |
|
Net interest income | 1,436 |
| (35 | ) | | (408 | ) | (473 | ) | | 43,079 |
| 40,705 |
|
Total net revenue | 1,439 |
| (255 | ) | | (2,185 | ) | (1,810 | ) | | 87,296 |
| 82,920 |
|
Provision for credit losses | — |
| (3 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 4,158 |
| 3,323 |
|
Noninterest expense | 724 |
| 394 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 49,158 |
| 47,674 |
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) | 715 |
| (646 | ) | | (2,185 | ) | (1,810 | ) | | 33,980 |
| 31,923 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) | (757 | ) | 18 |
| | (2,185 | ) | (1,810 | ) | | 6,069 |
| 6,515 |
|
Net income/(loss) | $ | 1,472 |
| $ | (664 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 27,911 |
| $ | 25,408 |
|
Average equity | $ | 68,417 |
| $ | 78,995 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 232,917 |
| $ | 228,995 |
|
Total assets | 812,333 |
| 742,693 |
| | NA |
| NA |
| | 2,764,661 |
| 2,615,183 |
|
Return on equity | NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 15 | % | 14 | % |
Overhead ratio | NM |
| NM |
| | NM |
| NM |
| | 56 |
| 57 |
|
| |
(a) | Segment managed results reflect revenue on an FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results. |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of JPMorgan Chase & Co.:
Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries (the “Firm”) as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, and changes in stockholders’ equity for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-monththree-month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial statements”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Firm as of December 31, 2018,2019, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 26, 2019,25, 2020, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2018,2019, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Firm’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Firm in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
November 4, 2019May 7, 2020
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017
| | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates (unaudited) | (Taxable-equivalent interest and rates; in millions, except rates) | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2019 | | Three months ended September 30, 2018 | Three months ended March 31, 2020 | | Three months ended March 31, 2019 |
| Average balance | Interest(g) | | Rate (annualized) | | Average balance | Interest(g) | | Rate (annualized) | Average balance | Interest(f) | | Rate (annualized) | | Average balance | Interest(f) | | Rate (annualized) |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits with banks | $ | 267,578 |
| $ | 898 |
| | 1.33 | % | | $ | 408,595 |
| $ | 1,585 |
| | 1.54 | | $ | 279,748 |
| $ | 569 |
| | 0.82 | % | | $ | 290,281 |
| $ | 1,170 |
| | 1.64 | |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 276,721 |
| 1,542 |
| | 2.21 |
| | 208,439 |
| 952 |
| | 1.81 | | 253,403 |
| 1,095 |
| | 1.74 |
| | 288,478 |
| 1,647 |
| | 2.32 | |
Securities borrowed(a) | 139,939 |
| 434 |
| | 1.23 |
| | 117,057 |
| 248 |
|
| 0.84 | | 136,127 |
| 152 |
| | 0.45 |
| | 123,467 |
| 397 |
|
| 1.30 | |
Trading assets – debt instruments(a) | 339,198 |
| 2,671 |
| | 3.12 |
| | 241,074 |
| 2,170 |
| | 3.57 | | 346,911 |
| 2,472 |
| | 2.87 |
| | 322,541 |
| 2,782 |
| | 3.50 | |
Taxable securities | 308,619 |
| 2,132 |
| | 2.74 |
| | 187,942 |
| 1,402 |
| | 2.96 | | 388,223 |
| 2,233 |
| | 2.31 |
| | 220,817 |
| 1,705 |
| | 3.13 | |
Nontaxable securities(b)(a) | 34,515 |
| 396 |
| | 4.55 |
| | 42,045 |
| 490 |
| | 4.62 | | 33,306 |
| 365 |
| | 4.41 |
| | 38,583 |
| 453 |
| | 4.76 | |
Total investment securities | 343,134 |
| 2,528 |
| | 2.92 |
| (h) | | 229,987 |
| 1,892 |
| | 3.26 | (h) | 421,529 |
| 2,598 |
| | 2.48 |
| (g) | | 259,400 |
| 2,158 |
| | 3.37 | (g) |
Loans | 947,280 |
| 12,623 |
| | 5.29 |
| | 951,724 |
| 12,250 |
| | 5.11 | | 962,820 |
| 11,966 |
| | 5.00 |
| | 968,019 |
| 12,920 |
| | 5.41 | |
All other interest-earning assets(c)(b) | 51,304 |
| 552 |
| | 4.27 |
| | 46,429 |
| 496 |
| | 4.23 | | 65,194 |
| 419 |
| | 2.58 |
| | 46,708 |
| 458 |
| | 3.98 | |
Total interest-earning assets(a) | 2,365,154 |
| 21,248 |
| | 3.56 |
| | 2,203,305 |
| 19,593 |
| | 3.53 | | 2,465,732 |
| 19,271 |
| | 3.14 |
| | 2,298,894 |
| 21,532 |
| | 3.80 | |
Allowance for loan losses | (13,142 | ) | | | | | (13,207 | ) | | | (17,357 | ) | | | | | (13,532 | ) | | |
Cash and due from banks | 20,375 |
| | | | | 21,101 |
| | | 21,668 |
| | | | | 21,458 |
| | |
Trading assets – equity and other instruments(a) | 113,980 |
| | | | | 119,915 |
| | | 114,479 |
| | | | | 108,598 |
| | |
Trading assets – derivative receivables | 57,062 |
| | | | | 62,075 |
| | | 66,309 |
| | | | | 52,522 |
| | |
Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets
| 53,125 |
| | | | | 54,652 |
| | | 52,690 |
| | | | | 54,302 |
| | |
All other noninterest-earning assets | 168,498 |
| | | | | 151,780 |
| | | 186,711 |
| | | | | 162,472 |
| | |
Total assets | $ | 2,765,052 |
| | | | | $ | 2,599,621 |
| | | $ | 2,890,232 |
| | | | | $ | 2,684,714 |
| | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits(a) | $ | 1,123,452 |
| $ | 2,409 |
| | 0.85 | % | | $ | 1,041,896 |
| $ | 1,621 |
| | 0.62 | | $ | 1,216,555 |
| $ | 1,575 |
| | 0.52 | % | | $ | 1,080,274 |
| $ | 2,188 |
| | 0.82 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 239,698 |
| 1,241 |
| | 2.05 |
| | 184,377 |
| 827 |
| | 1.78 | | 243,922 |
| 787 |
| | 1.30 |
| | 209,065 |
| 1,110 |
| | 2.15 | |
Short-term borrowings(d)(c) | 44,814 |
| 261 |
| | 2.31 |
| | 52,779 |
| 288 |
| | 2.17 | | 37,288 |
| 151 |
| | 1.63 |
| | 67,074 |
| 427 |
| | 2.59 | |
Trading liabilities – debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(f)(e) | 183,369 |
| 660 |
| | 1.43 |
| | 176,795 |
| 617 |
| | 1.39 | | 192,950 |
| 372 |
| | 0.77 |
| | 183,478 |
| 719 |
| | 1.59 | |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 21,123 |
| 134 |
| | 2.53 |
| | 19,921 |
| 122 |
| | 2.41 | | 18,048 |
| 90 |
| | 2.02 |
| | 22,829 |
| 150 |
| | 2.66 | |
Long-term debt(a) | 248,985 |
| 2,188 |
| | 3.49 |
| | 241,878 |
| 2,056 |
| | 3.37 | | 243,996 |
| 1,747 |
| | 2.88 |
| | 248,302 |
| 2,342 |
| | 3.82 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities(a) | 1,861,441 |
| 6,893 |
| | 1.47 |
| | 1,717,646 |
| 5,531 |
| | 1.28 | | 1,952,759 |
| 4,722 |
| | 0.97 |
| | 1,811,022 |
| 6,936 |
| | 1.55 | |
Noninterest-bearing deposits(a) | 407,428 |
| | | | | 410,966 |
| | | 419,631 |
| | | | | 399,468 |
| | |
Trading liabilities – equity and other instruments(f)(e) | 31,310 |
| | | | | 36,605 |
| | | 30,721 |
| | | | | 34,734 |
| | |
Trading liabilities – derivative payables | 45,987 |
| | | | | 44,810 |
| | | 54,990 |
| | | | | 39,567 |
| | |
All other liabilities, including the allowance for lending-related commitments(a) | 155,032 |
| | | | | 132,903 |
| | | 168,195 |
| | | | | 142,746 |
| | |
Total liabilities | 2,501,198 |
| | | | | 2,342,930 |
| | | 2,626,296 |
| | | | | 2,427,537 |
| | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | 28,241 |
| | | | | 26,252 |
| | | 29,406 |
| | | | | 27,126 |
| | |
Common stockholders’ equity | 235,613 |
| | | | | 230,439 |
| | | 234,530 |
| | | | | 230,051 |
| | |
Total stockholders’ equity | 263,854 |
| | | | | 256,691 |
| | | 263,936 |
| | | | | 257,177 |
| | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,765,052 |
| | | | | $ | 2,599,621 |
| | | $ | 2,890,232 |
| | | | | $ | 2,684,714 |
| | |
Interest rate spread(a) | | | 2.09 | % | | | | 2.25 | | | | 2.17 | % | | | | 2.25 | |
Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets(a) | | $ | 14,355 |
| | 2.41 |
| | | $ | 14,062 |
| | 2.53 | | | $ | 14,549 |
| | 2.37 |
| | | $ | 14,596 |
| | 2.57 | |
| |
(a) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm implemented certain presentation changes that impacted interest income and interest expense, but had no effect on net interest income. These changes were made to align the accounting treatment between the balance sheet and the related interest income or expense, primarily by offsetting interest income and expense for certain prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and payables that are currently presented as a single margin account on the balance sheet. In addition, the Firm reclassified balances related to certain instruments and structured notes from interest-earning/bearing to noninterest-earning/bearing assets and liabilities as the associated returns are recorded in principal transactions revenue and not in net interest income. These changes were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation. |
| |
(b) | Represents securities which are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
| |
(c)(b) | Includes prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
(d)(c) | Includes commercial paper. |
| |
(e)(d) | OtherAll other interest-bearing liabilities include prime brokerage-related customer payables. |
| |
(f)(e) | The combined balance of trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments were $102.3was $101.1 billion and $106.4$107.0 billion for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(g)(f) | Interest includes the effect of certain related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. |
| |
(h)(g) | The annualized rate for securities based on amortized cost was 2.97%2.52% and 3.29%3.40% for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively, and does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in AOCI. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates (unaudited) |
(Taxable-equivalent interest and rates; in millions, except rates) |
| | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2019 | | Nine months ended September 30, 2018 |
| Average balance | Interest(g) | | Rate (annualized) | | Average balance | Interest(g) | | Rate (annualized) |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits with banks | $ | 282,483 |
| $ | 3,200 |
| | 1.51 | % | | | $ | 419,392 |
| $ | 4,449 |
| | 1.42 | |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 284,616 |
| 4,865 |
| | 2.29 |
| | | 203,969 |
| 2,490 |
| | 1.63 | |
Securities borrowed(a) | 129,915 |
| 1,298 |
| | 1.34 |
| | | 113,112 |
| 549 |
| | 0.65 | |
Trading assets – debt instruments(a) | 337,879 |
| 8,380 |
| | 3.32 |
| | | 240,404 |
| 6,415 |
| | 3.57 | |
Taxable securities | 258,406 |
| 5,712 |
| | 2.96 |
| | | 190,970 |
| 4,098 |
| | 2.87 | |
Nontaxable securities(b) | 36,490 |
| 1,271 |
| | 4.66 |
| | | 42,911 |
| 1,494 |
| | 4.65 | |
Total investment securities | 294,896 |
| 6,983 |
| | 3.17 |
| (h) | | 233,881 |
| 5,592 |
| | 3.20 | (h) |
Loans | 956,641 |
| 38,313 |
| | 5.35 |
| | | 939,408 |
| 35,047 |
| | 4.99 | |
All other interest-earning assets(a)(c) | 48,193 |
| 1,482 |
| | 4.11 |
| | | 48,743 |
| 1,430 |
| | 3.92 | |
Total interest-earning assets(a) | 2,334,623 |
| 64,521 |
| | 3.69 |
| | | 2,198,909 |
| 55,972 |
| | 3.40 | |
Allowance for loan losses | (13,366 | ) | | | | | | (13,303 | ) | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | 20,824 |
| | | | | | 21,771 |
| | | | |
Trading assets – equity and other instruments(a) | 114,394 |
| | | | | | 124,048 |
| | | | |
Trading assets – derivative receivables | 54,098 |
| | | | | | 61,188 |
| | | | |
Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets
| 53,853 |
| | | | | | 54,656 |
| | | | |
All other noninterest-earning assets | 165,475 |
| | | | | | 152,325 |
| | | | |
Total assets | $ | 2,729,901 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,599,594 |
| | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits(a) | $ | 1,102,751 |
| $ | 7,010 |
| | 0.85 | % | | | $ | 1,039,646 |
| $ | 4,021 |
| | 0.52 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements | 225,471 |
| 3,577 |
| | 2.12 |
| | | 190,832 |
| 2,164 |
| | 1.52 | |
Short-term borrowings(a)(d) | 56,635 |
| 1,051 |
| | 2.48 |
| | | 51,349 |
| 757 |
| | 1.97 | |
Trading liabilities – debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(a)(e)(f) | 186,167 |
| 2,141 |
| | 1.54 |
| | | 176,104 |
| 1,674 |
| | 1.27 | |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs | 23,549 |
| 459 |
| | 2.61 |
| | | 21,449 |
| 366 |
| | 2.28 | |
Long-term debt(a) | 247,782 |
| 6,796 |
| | 3.67 |
| | | 244,307 |
| 5,812 |
| | 3.18 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities(a) | 1,842,355 |
| 21,034 |
| | 1.53 |
| | | 1,723,687 |
| 14,794 |
| | 1.15 | |
Noninterest-bearing deposits(a) | 405,075 |
| | | | | | 413,501 |
| | | | |
Trading liabilities – equity and other instruments(a)(f) | 32,059 |
| | | | | | 33,607 |
| | | | |
Trading liabilities – derivative payables | 41,952 |
| | | | | | 42,919 |
| | | | |
All other liabilities, including the allowance for lending-related commitments(a) | 148,086 |
| | | | | | 130,755 |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | 2,469,527 |
| | | | | | 2,344,469 |
| | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | 27,457 |
| | | | | | 26,130 |
| | | | |
Common stockholders’ equity | 232,917 |
| | | | | | 228,995 |
| | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | 260,374 |
| | | | | | 255,125 |
| | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,729,901 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,599,594 |
| | | | |
Interest rate spread(a) | | | | 2.16 | % | | | | | | 2.25 | |
Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets(a) | | $ | 43,487 |
| | 2.49 |
| | | | $ | 41,178 |
| | 2.50 | |
| |
(a) | In the second quarter of 2019, the Firm implemented certain presentation changes that impacted interest income and interest expense, but had no effect on net interest income. These changes were made to align the accounting treatment between the balance sheet and the related interest income or expense, primarily by offsetting interest income and expense for certain prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and payables that are currently presented as a single margin account on the balance sheet. In addition, the Firm reclassified balances related to certain instruments and structured notes from interest-earning/bearing to noninterest-earning/bearing assets and liabilities as the associated returns are recorded in principal transactions revenue and not in net interest income. These changes were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current presentation.
|
| |
(b) | Represents securities which are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
| |
(c) | Includes prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
(d) | Includes commercial paper. |
| |
(e) | Other interest-bearing liabilities include prime brokerage-related customer payables. |
| |
(f) | The combined balance of trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments were $106.8 billion and $105.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(g) | Interest includes the effect of certain related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. |
| |
(h) | The annualized rate for securities based on amortized cost was 3.20% and 3.23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in AOCI. |
|
| | | | |
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS |
20182019 Form 10-K: Annual report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2018,2019, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ABS: Asset-backed securities
Active foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings are ongoing. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states.
AFS: Available-for-sale
Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans: represents period-end allowance for loan losses divided by retained loans.
Amortized cost: Amount at which a financing receivable or investment is originated or acquired, adjusted for accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of cash, charge-offs, foreign exchange, and fair value hedge accounting adjustments. For AFS securities, amortized cost is also reduced by any impairment losses recognized in earnings. Amortized cost is not reduced by the allowance for credit losses, except where explicitly presented net.
AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
ARM(s): Adjustable rate mortgage(s)
AUC: “Assets under custody”: Represents assets held directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under safekeeping, custody and servicing arrangements.
Auto loan and lease origination volume: Dollar amount of auto loans and leases originated.
AWM: Asset & Wealth Management
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs: represents the interest of third-party holders of debt, equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorgan Chase consolidates.
Benefit obligation: refers to the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for OPEB plans.
BHC: Bank holding company
Bridge Financing Portfolio: A portfolio of held-for-sale unfunded loan commitments and funded loans. The unfunded commitments include both short-term bridge loan commitments that will ultimately be replaced by longer term financing as well as term loan commitments. The funded loans include term loans and funded revolver facilities.
CB: Commercial Banking
CBB: Consumer & Business Banking
CCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CCB: Consumer & Community Banking
CDS: Credit default swaps
CECL: Current Expected Credit Losses
CEO: Chief Executive Officer
CET1 Capital:capital: Common equity Tier 1 Capitalcapital
CFTC: Commodity Futures Trading Commission
CFO: Chief Financial Officer
Chase Bank USA, N.A.: Chase Bank USA, National Association
CIB: Corporate & Investment Bank
CIO: Chief Investment Office
Client assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage, administration and deposit accounts.
Client deposits and other third-party liabilities: Deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of client cash management programs.
CLTV: Combined loan-to-value
Collateral-dependent: A loan is considered to be collateral-dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely bysubstantially through the underlying operation or sale of thecollateral rather than by cash flows fromwhen the borrower’s operations, income or other resources.borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, including when foreclosure is deemed probable based on borrower delinquency.
Commercial Card: provides a wide range of payment services to corporate and public sector clients worldwide through the commercial card products. Services include procurement, corporate travel and entertainment, expense
management services, and business-to-business payment solutions.
Core loans: represents loans central to the Firm’s ongoing businesses; core loans excludes loans classified as trading assets, runoff portfolios, discontinued portfolios and portfolios the Firm has an intent to exit.
Credit derivatives: Financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Upon the occurrence of a credit event by the reference entity, which may include, among other events, the bankruptcy or failure to pay its obligations, or certain restructurings of the debt of the reference entity, neither party has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value at the time of settling the credit derivative contract. The determination as to whether a credit event has occurred is generally made by the relevant International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Determinations Committee.
Criticized: Criticized loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables that are classified as special mention, substandard and doubtful categories for regulatory purposes and are generally consistent with a rating of CCC+/Caa1 and below, as defined by S&P and Moody’s.
CRO: Chief Risk Officer
CVA: Credit valuation adjustment
DVA: Debit valuation adjustment
EC: European Commission
Eligible LTD: Long-term debt satisfying certain eligibility criteria
Embedded derivatives: are implicit or explicit terms or features of a financial instrument that affect some or all of
the cash flows or the value of the instrument in a manner similar to a derivative. An instrument containing such terms or features is referred to as a “hybrid.” The component of the hybrid that is the non-derivative instrument is referred to as the “host.” For example, callable debt is a hybrid instrument that contains a plain vanilla debt instrument (i.e., the host) and an embedded option that allows the issuer to redeem the debt issue at a specified date for a specified amount (i.e., the embedded derivative). However, a floating rate instrument is not a hybrid composed of a fixed-rate instrument and an interest rate swap.
ERISA: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
EPS: Earnings per share
Exchange-traded derivatives: Derivative contracts that are executed on an exchange and settled via a central clearing house.
Expense categories:
Volume- and revenue-related expenses generally correlate with changes in the related business/transaction volume or revenue. Examples of volume- and revenue-related expenses include commissions and incentive compensation, depreciation expense related to operating lease assets, and brokerage expense related to equities trading transaction volume.
Investments include expenses associated with supporting medium- to longer-term strategic plans of the Firm. Examples of investments include initiatives in technology (including related compensation), marketing, and compensation for new bankers and client advisors.
Structural expenses are those associated with the day-to-day cost of running the bank and are expenses not covered by the above two categories. Examples of structural expenses include employee salaries and benefits, as well as noncompensation costs such as real estate and all other expenses.
EU: European Union
Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
FCA: Financial Conduct Authority
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Reserve: The Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
FHA: Federal Housing Administration
FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank
FICO score: A measure of consumer credit risk based on information in consumer credit reports produced by Fair Isaac Corporation. Because certain aged data is excluded from credit reports based on rules in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, FICO scores may not reflect all historical information about a consumer.
Firm: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Forward points: represents the interest rate differential between two currencies, which is either added to or
subtracted from the current exchange rate (i.e., “spot rate”) to determine the forward exchange rate.
FRBB: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
FRBNY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Free-standing derivatives: is a derivative contract entered into either separate and apart from any of the Firm’s other financial instruments or equity transactions. Or, in conjunction with some other transaction and is legally detachable and separately exercisable.
FTE: Fully taxable-equivalent
FVA: Funding valuation adjustment
FX: Foreign exchange
G7: “Group of Seven nations”: Countries in the G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S.
G7 government securities: Securities issued by the government of one of the G7 nations.
Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association
GSIB: Global systemically important banks
HELOAN: Home equity loan
HELOC: Home equity line of credit
Home equity – senior lien: represents loans and commitments where JPMorgan Chase holds the first security interest on the property.
Home equity – junior lien: represents loans and commitments where JPMorgan Chase holds a security interest that is subordinate in rank to other liens.
HQLA: High-quality liquid assets
HTM: Held-to-maturity
IBOR: Interbank Offered Rate
IDI: Insured depository institutions
IHC: JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding company
Impaired loan:Impaired loans are loans measured at amortized cost, for which it is probable that the Firm will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the agreement. Impaired loans include the following:
All wholesale nonaccrual loans
All TDRs (both wholesale and consumer), including ones that have returned to accrual status
IPO: Initial public offering
Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based on JPMorgan Chase’s internal risk assessment system. “Investment grade” generally represents a risk profile similar to a rating of a “BBB-”/“Baa3” or better, as defined by independent rating agencies.
IR: Interest rate
ISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association
JPMorgan Chase: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
J.P. Morgan Securities: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
LCR: Liquidity coverage ratio
LGD: Loss given default
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
LLC: Limited Liability Company
LOB: Line of business
Loss emergence period: represents the time period between the date at which the loss is estimated to have been incurred and the ultimate realization of that loss.
LTV: “Loan-to-value ratio”: For residential real estate loans, the relationship, expressed as a percentage, between the
principal amount of a loan and the appraised value of the collateral (i.e., residential real estate) securing the loan.
Origination date LTV ratio
The LTV ratio at the origination date of the loan. Origination date LTV ratios are calculated based on the actual appraised values of collateral (i.e., loan-level data) at the origination date.
Current estimated LTV ratio
An estimate of the LTV as of a certain date. The current estimated LTV ratios are calculated using estimated collateral values derived from a nationally recognized home price index measured at the metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) level. These MSA-level home price indices consist of actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. As a result, the estimated collateral values used to calculate these ratios do not represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as such, the resulting LTV ratios are necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as estimates.
Combined LTV ratio
The LTV ratio considering all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. Combined LTV ratios are used for junior lien home equity products.
Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of Firmwide financial results that includes reclassifications to present revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Management also uses this financial measure at the segment level, because it believes this provides information to enable investors to understand the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment
and facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors.
Master netting agreement: A single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due).
Measurement alternative: Measures equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer.
Merchant Services: offers merchants payment processing capabilities, fraud and risk management, data and analytics, and other payments services. Through Merchant Services, merchants of all sizes can accept payments via credit and debit cards and payments in multiple currencies.
MBS: Mortgage-backed securities
MD&A: Management’s discussion and analysis
MMLF: Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility
MMMF: Money market mutual funds
Moody’s: Moody’s Investor Services
Mortgage product types:
Alt-A
Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) a high CLTV ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv) a debt-to-income ratio above normal limits. A substantial proportion of the Firm’s Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does not provide complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her income.
Option ARMs
The option ARM real estate loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the borrower with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only or minimum payment. The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based on the interest rate charged during the introductory period. This introductory rate is usually significantly below the fully indexed rate. The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month, and any unpaid interest is deferred and added to the principal balance of the loan. Option ARM loans are subject to payment recast, which converts the loan to a variable-rate fully amortizing loan upon meeting specified loan balance and anniversary date triggers.
Prime
Prime mortgage loans are made to borrowers with good credit records who meet specific underwriting requirements, including prescriptive requirements related to income and overall debt levels. New prime mortgage borrowers provide full documentation and generally have reliable payment histories.
Subprime
Subprime loans are loans that, prior to mid-2008, were offered to certain customers with one or more high risk
characteristics, including but not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories; (ii) a high LTV ratio of greater than 80% (without borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) a high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) an occupancy type for the loan is other than the borrower’s primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies or late payments on the loan.
MSA: Metropolitan statistical areas
MSR: Mortgage servicing rights
NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented.
NAV: Net Asset Value
Net Capital Rule: Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Net charge-off/(recovery) rate: represents net charge-offs/(recoveries) (annualized) divided by average retained loans for the reporting period.
Net interchange income includes the following components:
| |
• | Interchange income: Fees earned by credit and debit card issuers on sales transactions. |
| |
• | Rewards costs: The cost to the Firm for points earned by cardholders enrolled in credit card rewards programs.programs generally tied to sales transactions. |
| |
• | Partner payments: Payments to co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of loyalty program rewards earned by cardholders on credit card transactions. |
Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average rate paid for all sources of funds.
NM: Not meaningful
Nonaccrual loans: Loans for which interest income is not recognized on an accrual basis. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status.
Nonperforming assets: Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, nonperforming derivatives and certain assets acquired in loan satisfactions, predominantly real estate owned and other commercial and personal property.
OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI: Other comprehensive income/(loss)
OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefit
OTC: “Over-the-counter derivatives”: Derivative contracts that are negotiated, executed and settled bilaterally between two derivative counterparties, where one or both counterparties is a derivatives dealer.
OTC cleared: “Over-the-counter cleared derivatives”: Derivative contracts that are negotiated and executed bilaterally, but subsequently settled via a central clearing house, such that each derivative counterparty is only exposed to the default of that clearing house.
OTTI: Other-than-temporary impairment
Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue.
Parent Company: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Participating securities: represents unvested share-based compensation awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, “dividends”), which are included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method. JPMorgan Chase grants restricted stock and RSUs to certain employees under its share-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating
securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
PCD: “Purchased credit deteriorated” assets represent acquired financial assets that as of the date of acquisition have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Firm.
PCI: “Purchased credit-impaired” loans representsrepresented certain loans that were acquired and deemed to be credit-impaired on the acquisition date in accordance with thedate. The superseded FASB guidance of the FASB. The guidance allowsallowed purchasers to aggregate credit-impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans havehad common risk characteristics (e.g., product type, LTV ratios, FICO scores, past due status, geographic location). A pool iswas then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.
PD: Probability of default
PDCF: Primary Dealer Credit Facility
Phishing: a type of social engineering cyberattack received through email or online messages.
PPP: Paycheck Protection Program
PRA: Prudential Regulation Authority
Pre-provision profit/(loss): represents total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm believes that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses.
Principal transactions revenue: Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which the Firm is willing to buy a financial or other instrument and the price at which the Firm is willing to sell that instrument. It also consists of realized (as a result of closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments) and unrealized (as a result of changes in valuation) gains and losses on financial and other instruments (including those accounted for under the fair value option) primarily used in client-driven market-making activities and on private equity investments. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities (including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities). Principal transactions revenue also includes certain realized and unrealized gains and losses related to hedge accounting and specified risk-management activities, including: (a) certain derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships (primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk), (b) certain derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit risk and foreign exchange risk, and (c) other derivatives.
PSU(s): Performance share units
Receivables from customers: primarily represents prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables from brokerage customers that are collateralized through assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts, as such no allowance is held against these receivables. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.
Regulatory VaR: Daily aggregated VaR calculated in accordance with regulatory rules.
REO: Real estate owned
Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP, which excludes the impact of taxable-equivalent adjustments.
Retained loans: Loans that are held-for-investment (i.e. excludes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value).
Revenue wallet: Total fee revenue based on estimates of investment banking fees generated across the industry (i.e., the revenue wallet) from investment banking transactions in M&A, equity and debt underwriting, and loan syndications. Source: Dealogic, a third-party provider of investment banking competitive analysis and volume based league tables for the above noted industry products.
RHS: Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
ROE: Return on equity
ROTCE: Return on tangible common equity
ROU assets: Right-of-use assets
RSU(s): Restricted stock units
RWA: “Risk-weighted assets”: Basel III establishes two comprehensive approaches for calculating RWA (a Standardized approach and an Advanced approach) which include capital requirements for credit risk, market risk, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, also operational risk. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is calculated on a generally consistent basis between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced.
Scored portfolio:portfolios: The scored portfolioConsumer loan portfolios that predominantly includesinclude residential real estate loans, credit card loans, auto loans to individuals and certain auto andsmall business banking loans where credit loss estimates are based on statistical analysis of credit losses over discrete periods of time. The statistical analysis uses portfolio modeling, credit scoring and decision-support tools.loans.
S&P: Standard and Poors
SAR(s): Stock appreciation rights
SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Seed capital: Initial JPMorgan capital invested in products,
such as mutual funds, with the intention of ensuring the fund is of sufficient size to represent a viable offering to clients, enabling pricing of its shares, and allowing the manager to develop a track record. After these goals are achieved, the intent is to remove the Firm’s capital from the investment.
Shelf Deals: Shelf offerings are SEC provisions that allow issuers to register for new securities without selling the entire issuance at once. Since these issuances are filed with the SEC but are not yet priced in the market, they are not included in the league tables until the actual securities are issued.
Single-name: Single reference-entities
SLR: Supplementary leverage ratio
SMBS: Stripped mortgage-backed securities
SMCCF: Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility
SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing Rate
SPEs: Special purpose entities
SPV: Special purpose vehicle
Structural interest rate risk: represents interest rate risk of the non-trading assets and liabilities of the Firm.
Structured notes: Structured notes are financial instruments whose cash flows are linked to the movement in one or more indexes, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodities prices, prepayment rates, or other market variables. The notes typically contain embedded (but not separable or detachable) derivatives. Contractual cash flows for principal, interest, or both can vary in amount and timing throughout the life of the note based on non-traditional indexes or non-traditional uses of traditional interest rates or indexes.
Suspended foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings have started but are currently on hold, which could be due to bankruptcy or loss mitigation. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states.
Taxable-equivalent basis: In presenting managed results, the total net revenue for each of the business segments and the Firm is presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities; the corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense.
TBVPS: Tangible book value per share
TCE: Tangible common equity
TDR: “Troubled debt restructuring” is deemed to occur when the Firm modifies the original terms of a loan agreement by granting a concession to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty. Loans with short-term and other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs.
TLAC: Total Loss Absorbing Capacity
U.K.: United Kingdom
Unaudited: Financial statements and information that have not been subjected to auditing procedures sufficient to permit an independent certified public accountant to express an opinion.
U.S.: United States of America
U.S. government agencies: U.S. government agencies include, but are not limited to, agencies such as Ginnie Mae and FHA, and do not include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (“U.S. GSEs”). In general, obligations of U.S. government agencies are fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government in the event of a default.
U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
U.S. GSE(s): “U.S. government-sponsored enterprises” are quasi-governmental, privately-held entities established or
chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress to improve the flow of credit to specific sectors of the economy and provide certain essential services to the public. U.S. GSEs include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but do not include Ginnie Mae or FHA. U.S. GSE obligations are not explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
U.S. Treasury: U.S. Department of the Treasury
VA: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
VaR: “Value-at-risk” is a measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves in an ordinary market environment.
VIEs: Variable interest entities
Warehouse loans: consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as trading assets.
CONSUMER & COMMUNITY BANKING (“CCB”)
Debit and credit card sales volume: Dollar amount of cardmember purchases, net of returns.
Deposit margin/deposit spread: representsRepresents net interest income expressed as a percentage of average deposits.
Home Lending Production and Home Lending Servicing revenue comprises the following:
Net mortgage servicing revenue: Includes
operating revenue earned from servicing third-party
mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in
which the service is provided,provided; changes in the fair value of
MSRs, MSRs; the impact of risk management activities
associated with MSRsMSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies.
Net production revenue: Includes fees and income
recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the
intent to sell;sell, and the impact of risk management activities
associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse
loans; and changes in the fair value of any residual interests
held from mortgage securitizations. loans. Net production revenue
also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies) held-for-sale, and changes in the fair value on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell andof financial instruments measured at fair value under the fair value option.
Mortgage origination channels comprise the following:
Retail: Borrowers who buy or refinance a home through direct contact with a mortgage banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are frequently referred to a mortgage banker by a banker in a Chase branch, real estate brokers, home builders or other third parties.
Correspondent: Banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial institutions that sell closed loans to the Firm.
Card Services: includes the Credit Card and Merchant Services businesses.
Credit Card: is a business that primarily issues credit cards to consumers and small businesses.
Merchant Services: is a business that primarily processes transactions for merchants.
Net revenue rate: represents Credit Card Services net revenue (annualized) expressed as a percentage of average loans for the period.
Auto loan and lease origination volume: Dollar amount of auto loans and leases originated.
CORPORATE & INVESTMENT BANK (“CIB”)
Definition of selected CIB revenue:
Investment Banking: incorporates all revenue associated with investment banking activities, and is reported net of investment banking revenue shared with other lines of business.LOBs.
Treasury Services: Wholesale Paymentsoffers a broad range of products and services that enable clients to manage payments and receipts, as well as invest and manage funds. Products include U.S. dollar and multi-currency clearing, ACH, lockbox, disbursement and reconciliation services, check deposits, and currency-related services. includes the following:
| |
• | Treasury Services: offers a broad range of products and services that enable clients to manage payments and receipts, as well as invest and manage funds. Products include U.S. dollar and multi-currency clearing, automated clearing house, lockbox, disbursement and reconciliation services, check deposits, and currency-related services; |
| |
• | Merchant Services: primarily processes transactions for merchants; and |
| |
• | Trade Finance: which includes loans tied directly to goods crossing borders, export/import loans, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, and supply chain finance. |
Lending: includes net interest income, fees, gains or losses on loan sale activity, gains or losses on securities received as part of a loan restructuring, and the risk management results related to the credit portfolio. Lending also includes Trade Finance, which includes loans tied directly to goods crossing borders, export/import loans, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, and supply chain finance.
Fixed Income Markets: primarily includes revenue related to market-making across global fixed income markets, including foreign exchange, interest rate, credit and commodities markets.
Equity Markets: primarily includes revenue related to market-making across global equity products, including cash instruments, derivatives, convertibles and prime brokerage.
Securities Services: primarily includes custody, fund accounting and administration, and securities lending products sold principally to asset managers, insurance companies and public and private investment funds. Also includes collateral management and depositary receipts businesses which provide collateral management products, and depositary bank services for American and global depositary receipt programs.
Description of certain business metrics:
Assets under custody (“AUC”): represents activities associated with the safekeeping and servicing of assets on which Securities Services earns fees.
Investment banking fees: represents advisory, equity underwriting, bond underwriting and loan syndication fees.
COMMERCIAL BANKING (“CB”)
Commercial Banking provides comprehensive financial solutions, including lending, treasury services,wholesale payments, investment banking and asset management products across three primary client segments: Middle Market Banking, Corporate Client Banking and Commercial Real Estate Banking. Other includes amounts not aligned with a primary client segment.
Middle Market Banking: covers small business and midsized corporations, local governments and nonprofit clients.
Corporate Client Banking: covers large corporations.
Commercial Real Estate Banking: covers investors, developers, and owners of multifamily, office, retail, industrial and affordable housing properties.
CB product revenue comprises the following:
Lending: includes a variety of financing alternatives, which are primarily provided on a secured basis; collateral includes receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate or other assets. Products include term loans, revolving lines of credit, bridge financing, asset-based structures, leases, and standby letters of credit.
Treasury services:Wholesale payments: includes revenue from a broad range of products and services that enable CB clients to manage payments and receipts, as well as invest and manage funds.
Investment banking: includes revenue from a range of products providing CB clients with sophisticated capital-raising alternatives, as well as balance sheet and risk management tools through advisory, equity underwriting, and loan syndications. Revenue from fixed income and equity market products used by CB clients is also included.
Other: product revenue primarily includes tax-equivalent adjustments generated from Community Development Banking activity and certain income derived from principal transactions.
ASSET & WEALTH MANAGEMENT (“AWM”)
Assets under management (“AUM”): represent assets managed by AWM on behalf of its Private Banking, Institutional and Retail clients.
Client assets: represent assets under management, as well as custody, brokerage, administration and deposit accounts.
Multi-asset: Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset class.
Alternative assets: The following types of assets constitute alternative investments – hedge funds, currency, real estate, private equity and other investment funds designed to focus on nontraditional strategies.
AWM’s lines of business consist of the following:
Asset Management: provides comprehensive global investment services - including asset management, pension analytics, asset-liability management and active risk-budgeting strategies.
Wealth Management: offers investment advice and wealth management, including investment management, capital markets and risk management, tax and estate planning, banking, lending and specialty-wealth advisory services.
AWM’s client segments consist of the following:
Private Banking: clients include high- and ultra-high-net-worth individuals, families, money managers, business owners and small corporations worldwide.
Institutional: clients include both corporate and public institutions, endowments, foundations, nonprofit organizations and governments worldwide.
Retail: clients include financial intermediaries and individual investors.
Asset Management has two high-level measures of its overall fund performance:
Percentage of mutual fund assets under management in funds rated 4- or 5-star: Mutual fund rating services rank funds based on their risk-adjusted performance over various periods. A 5-star rating is the best rating and represents the top 10% of industry-wide ranked funds.
A 4-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 3-star rating represents the next 35% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 2-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 1-star rating is the worst rating and represents the bottom 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. The “overall Morningstar rating” is derived from a weighted average of the performance associated with a fund’s three-, five- and ten-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. For U.S. domiciled funds, separate star ratings are given at the individual share class level. The Nomura “star rating” is based on three-year risk-adjusted performance only. Funds with fewer than three years of history are not rated and
hence excluded from this analysis. All ratings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive this analysis are sourced from these fund rating providers. The data providers re-denominate the asset values into U.S. dollars. This % of AUM is based on star ratings at the share class level for U.S. domiciled funds, and at a “primary share class” level to represent the star rating of all other funds except for Japan where Nomura provides ratings at the fund level. The “primary share class”, as defined by Morningstar, denotes the share class recommended as being the best proxy for the portfolio and in most cases will be the most retail version (based upon annual management charge, minimum investment, currency and other factors). The performance data could have been different if all funds/accounts would have been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Percentage of mutual fund assets under management in funds ranked in the 1st or 2nd quartile (one, three, and five years): All quartile rankings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive this analysis are sourced from the fund ranking providers. Quartile rankings are done on the net-of-fee absolute return of each fund. The data providers re-denominate the asset values into U.S. dollars. This % of AUM is based on fund performance and associated peer rankings at the share class level for U.S. domiciled funds, at a “primary share class” level to represent the quartile ranking of the U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong funds and at the fund level for all other funds. The “primary share class”, as defined by Morningstar, denotes the share class recommended as being the best proxy for the portfolio and in most cases will be the most retail version (based upon annual management charge, minimum investment, currency and other factors). Where peer group rankings given for a fund are in more than one “primary share class” territory both rankings are included to reflect local market competitiveness (applies to “Offshore Territories” and “HK SFC Authorized” funds only). The performance data could have been different if all funds/accounts would have been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Refer to the Market Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis and pages 124–131119–126 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Firm’s management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Refer to Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the Certification statements issuedCertifications furnished by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.Officer, respectively.
The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting. Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, in a firm as large and complex as JPMorgan Chase, lapses or deficiencies in internal controls domay occur from time to time, and there can be no assurance that any such deficiencies will not result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controlscontrol in the future.future and collateral consequences therefrom. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 148142 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for further information. There was no change in the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Refer to the discussion of the Firm’s material legal proceedings in Note 2425 of this Form 10-Q for information that updates the disclosures set forth under Part I, Item 3: Legal Proceedings, in JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Refer toThe following discussion supplements the discussion of risk
factors affecting the Firm as set forth in Part I, Item 1A:
Risk Factors on pages 7–6–28 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K and Forward-Looking Statements on page 79 of this Form 10-Q for a10-K. The discussion of certain risk factors, affectingas so supplemented, sets forth the material risk factors that could affect JPMorgan Chase’s financial condition and operations. Readers should not consider any descriptions of such factors to be a complete set of all potential risks that could affect the Firm.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused and is causing significant harm to the global economy and our businesses.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a strain of novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, a global pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and governmental responses to the pandemic have had, and continue to have, a severe impact on global economic conditions, including:
significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets
disruption of global supply chains
closures of many businesses, leading to loss of revenues and increased unemployment, and
the institution of social distancing and sheltering-in-place requirements in the U.S. and other countries.
If the pandemic is prolonged, or other diseases emerge that give rise to similar effects, the adverse impact on the global economy could deepen.
The continuation of the adverse economic conditions caused by the pandemic can be expected to have a significant adverse effect on JPMorgan Chase’s businesses and results of operations, including:
significantly reduced demand for products and services from JPMorgan Chase’s clients and customers
possible recognition of credit losses and increases in the allowance for credit losses, especially if businesses remain closed, unemployment continues to rise and clients and customers draw on their lines of credit or seek additional loans to help finance their businesses
possible material impacts on the value of securities, derivatives and other financial instruments which JPMorgan Chase owns or in which it makes markets due to market fluctuations
possible downgrades in JPMorgan Chase’s credit ratings
possible constraints on liquidity and capital, whether due to increases in risk-weighted assets related to supporting client activities or to regulatory actions, and
the possibility that significant portions of JPMorgan Chase’s workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, sheltering-in-place arrangements, government actions or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic.
The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affects JPMorgan Chase’s businesses, results of operations and financial condition, as well as its regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic. In addition, JPMorgan Chase’s participation directly or on behalf of customers and clients in U.S. government programs designed to support individuals, households and businesses impacted by the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could be criticized and subject JPMorgan Chase to increased governmental and regulatory scrutiny, negative publicity or increased exposure to litigation, which could increase its operational, legal and compliance costs and damage its reputation. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects JPMorgan Chase’s business, results of operations and financial condition, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in Risk Factors in the 2019 Form 10-K.
Supervision and regulation
Refer to the Supervision and regulation section on pages 1–6 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for information on Supervision and Regulation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The Firm did not have any unregistered sale of equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020.
Repurchases under the common equity repurchase program
Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 45–4939–44 of this Form 10-Q and pages 85-9485-92 of JPMorgan Chase’s 20182019 Form 10-K for information regarding repurchases under the Firm’s common equity repurchase program.
On March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Firm temporarily suspended through the second quarter of 2020 repurchases of its common equity. Shares repurchased on a settlement-date basis, pursuant to the common equity repurchase program during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, were as follows.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2019 | Total shares of common stock repurchased | | Average price paid per share of common stock(a) | | Aggregate repurchases of common equity (in millions)(a) | | Dollar value of remaining authorized repurchase (in millions)(a) | |
First quarter | 49,534,646 |
| | $ | 102.78 |
| | $ | 5,091 |
| | $ | 5,290 |
| |
Second quarter | 47,434,255 |
| | 109.83 |
| | 5,210 |
| | 80 |
| (b) |
July | 16,285,176 |
| | 114.39 |
| | 1,863 |
| | 27,537 |
| |
August | 29,005,310 |
| | 108.78 |
| | 3,155 |
| | 24,382 |
| |
September | 16,720,914 |
| | 115.53 |
| | 1,931 |
| | 22,451 |
| (c) |
Third quarter | 62,011,400 |
| | 112.07 |
| | 6,949 |
| | 22,451 |
| (c) |
Year-to-date | 158,980,301 |
| | $ | 108.51 |
| | $ | 17,250 |
| | $ | 22,451 |
| (c) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 | Total shares of common stock repurchased | | Average price paid per share of common stock(a) | | Aggregate repurchases of common equity (in millions)(a) | | Dollar value of remaining authorized repurchase (in millions)(a) | |
January | 21,953,376 |
| | 135.92 |
| | 2,984 |
| | 12,596 |
| |
February | 19,349,585 |
| | 130.45 |
| | 2,524 |
| | 10,072 |
| |
March | 8,700,101 |
| | 102.15 |
| | 889 |
| | 9,183 |
| (b) |
First quarter | 50,003,062 |
| | 127.92 |
| | 6,397 |
| | 9,183 |
| (b) |
| |
(a) | Excludes commissions cost. |
| |
(b) | The $80 million unused portion under the prior Board authorization was canceled when the $29.4 billion repurchase program was authorized by the Board of Directors on June 27, 2019. |
| |
(c) | Represents the amount remaining under the $29.4 billion repurchase program. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Item 5. Other Information.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit |
| | |
10.1 | | |
| | |
15 | | |
| | |
31.1 | | |
| | |
31.2 | | |
| | |
32 | | |
| | |
101.INS | | The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.(c) |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(a) |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(a) |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(a) |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(a) |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(a) |
104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101). |
| |
(b) | Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| |
(c) | Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information included in the Firm’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated statements of income (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, (ii) the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, (iii) the Consolidated balance sheets (unaudited) as of September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2018,2019, (iv) the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, (v) the Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
(Registrant) |
|
| |
By: | /s/ Nicole Giles |
| Nicole Giles |
| Managing Director and Firmwide Controller |
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
| |
Date: | November 4, 2019May 7, 2020 |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit |
| | |
10.1 | | |
| | |
15 | | |
| | |
31.1 | | |
| | |
31.2 | | |
| | |
32 | | |
| | |
101.INS | | The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101). |
| | |
† | | This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |