Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
 
 
(Mark One)
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017
 
OR
 
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Transition Period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File Number: 1-4639
 
CTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



 
Indiana  35-0225010
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
   
2375 Cabot Drive, Lisle, IL  60532
(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)
 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 630-577-8800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒ No    o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer  ☒  
Non-accelerated filer  o
  
Smaller reporting company  o
      (Do not check if smaller reporting company)   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o No  ☒ 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of July 27, 2016: 32,758,961.April 24, 2017: 32,851,024.
 
 


Table of Contents

CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
   Page
    
 
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    


2
 

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.   Financial Statements
CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts) 
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30, June 28, June 30, June 28,March 31, March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016
Net sales$98,693
 $100,071
 $195,398
 $198,382
$100,154
 $96,705
Cost of goods sold64,236
 66,698
 127,472
 132,873
65,930
 63,237
Gross Margin34,457
 33,373
 67,926
 65,509
34,224
 33,468
Selling, general and administrative expenses15,764
 15,224
 30,411
 30,935
15,246
 14,872
Research and development expenses5,967
 5,487
 12,130
 10,686
6,003
 6,163
Restructuring and impairment charges206
 2,118
 206
 2,856
777
 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(11,577)
2

(11,351)
(1)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets2

(3)
Operating earnings24,097
 10,542
 36,530
 21,033
12,196
 12,436
Other (expense) income:     
  
Other income (expense):   
Interest expense(1,009) (653) (1,829) (1,241)(684) (820)
Interest income331
 853
 879
 1,641
253
 547
Other (expense) income(1,240) 117
 (1,436) (1,570)
Total other (expense) income(1,918) 317
 (2,386) (1,170)
Other income (expense)460
 (198)
Total other income (expense)29
 (471)
Earnings before income taxes22,179
 10,859
 34,144
 19,863
12,225
 11,965
Income tax expense (benefit)7,692
 (8,221) 11,794
 (5,504)
Income tax expense3,741
 4,102
Net earnings$14,487
 $19,080
 $22,350
 $25,367
$8,484
 $7,863
Earnings per share:

  
  
  


  
Basic$0.44
 $0.58
 $0.68
 $0.76
$0.26
 $0.24
Diluted$0.44
 $0.57
 $0.67
 $0.75
$0.25
 $0.24


 

 

 



 

Basic weighted – average common shares outstanding:32,759
 33,080
 32,695
 33,243
32,802
 32,632
Effect of dilutive securities466
 471
 485
 497
560
 373
Diluted weighted – average common shares outstanding33,225
 33,551
 33,180
 33,740
33,362
 33,005

 
 
 

 

 
 
 
Cash dividends declared per share$0.04
 $0.04
 $0.08
 $0.08
$0.04
 $0.04
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3
 

Table of Contents

CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ‑ UNAUDITED
(In thousands of dollars) 
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30,
June 28, June 30, June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016
Net earnings$14,487
 $19,080
 $22,350
 $25,367
$8,484
 $7,863
Other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
  
 
  
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax(67) 69
 227
 (17)
Changes in fair market value of derivatives, net of tax760
 294
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax947
 705
 1,855
 1,962
816
 908
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax(317) 1,491
 (726) 388
88
 (409)
Other comprehensive income$563
 $2,265
 $1,356
 $2,333
$1,664
 $793
Comprehensive income$15,050
 $21,345
 $23,706
 $27,700
Comprehensive earnings$10,148
 $8,656
 
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4
 

Table of Contents

CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of dollars)
 
 (Unaudited) 
 March 31, December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS 
  
Current Assets 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$121,819
 $113,805
Accounts receivable, net63,016
 62,612
Inventories, net30,954
 28,652
Other current assets11,431
 10,638
Total current assets227,220
 215,707
Property, plant and equipment, net83,268
 82,111
Other Assets 
  
Prepaid pension asset48,114
 46,183
Goodwill61,744
 61,744
Other intangible assets, net62,833
 64,370
Deferred income taxes42,779
 45,839
Other1,737
 1,743
Total other assets217,207
 219,879
Total Assets$527,695
 $517,697
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
Short-term notes payable$1,006

$1,006
Accounts payable41,937
 40,046
Accrued payroll and benefits7,590
 11,369
Accrued liabilities42,463
 45,708
Total current liabilities92,996
 98,129
Long-term debt94,000
 89,100
Post-retirement obligations7,008
 7,006
Other long-term obligations7,607
 5,580
Total Liabilities201,611
 199,815
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)




Shareholders’ Equity 
  
Common stock303,736
 302,832
Additional contributed capital38,985
 40,521
Retained earnings418,149
 410,979
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(91,530) (93,194)
Total shareholders’ equity before treasury stock669,340
 661,138
Treasury stock(343,256) (343,256)
Total shareholders’ equity326,084
 317,882
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$527,695
 $517,697
 (Unaudited) 
 June 30, December 31,
 2016 2015
ASSETS 
  
Current Assets 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$119,912
 $156,928
Accounts receivable, net62,125
 54,563
Inventories, net25,978
 24,600
Other current assets12,457
 9,863
Total current assets220,472
 245,954
Property, plant and equipment, net76,973
 69,872
Other Assets 
  
Prepaid pension asset37,712
 33,779
Goodwill61,744
 33,865
Other intangible assets, net67,567
 34,758
Deferred income taxes54,212
 63,809
Other1,154
 1,336
Total other assets222,389
 167,547
Total Assets$519,834
 $483,373
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
Accounts payable$41,679
 $40,299
Accrued payroll and benefits8,501
 7,147
Accrued liabilities46,915
 47,174
Total current liabilities97,095
 94,620
Long-term debt110,800
 90,700
Post retirement obligations7,105
 7,230
Other long-term obligations2,200
 9,169
Total Liabilities217,200
 201,719
Shareholders’ Equity 
  
Common stock302,146
 300,909
Additional contributed capital39,824
 41,166
Retained earnings401,569
 381,840
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(97,649) (99,005)
Total shareholders’ equity before treasury stock645,890
 624,910
Treasury stock(343,256) (343,256)
Total shareholders’ equity302,634
 281,654
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$519,834
 $483,373
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5
 

Table of Contents

CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ‑ UNAUDITED
(In thousands of dollars)
 
Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 20152017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net earnings $22,350
 $25,367
$8,484
 $7,863
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
 
  
Depreciation and amortization8,925
 8,093
4,708
 4,021
Pension and other post-retirement plan (income) expense(794) 3,297
Equity-based compensation967
 2,362
Restructuring charges206
 2,856
Prepaid pension assets
 (4,422)
Pension and other post-retirement plan income(417) (427)
Stock-based compensation880
 282
Restructuring and impairment charges777
 
Deferred income taxes2,877
 
2,313
 (1,067)
(Gain) loss on sales of fixed assets(11,351) (1)
(Gain) loss on foreign currency hedges(3)

Proceeds from settlement of foreign currency hedges46
 
Loss (gain) on sales of fixed assets2
 (3)
Changes in assets and liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts receivable(5,805) (6,628)7
 (8,122)
Inventories842
 (2,914)(2,076) 966
Other assets(2,115) (409)(16) (3,330)
Accounts payable169
 1,556
942
 1,647
Accrued payroll and benefits876
 (704)(5,169) 2,584
Accrued expenses(2,594) (2,588)(3,057) (869)
Income taxes payable800
 1,210
248
 735
Other liabilities(1,466) (11,581)2,232
 (1,398)
Pension and other post-retirement plans(175) 
(79) (58)
Net cash provided by operating activities13,755
 15,494
9,779
 2,824
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
  
 
  
Capital expenditures(7,483) (3,905)(3,806) (2,877)
Proceeds from sale of assets12,237
 3
1
 3
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired(73,063) 

 (72,830)
Net cash used in investing activities(68,309) (3,902)(3,805) (75,704)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
  
 
  
Payments of long-term debt(1,462,100) (562,300)(373,000) (521,300)
Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt1,482,200
 576,000
377,900
 571,900
Purchase of treasury stock
 (11,369)
Dividends paid(2,612) (2,668)(1,310) (1,303)
Windfall tax benefits from equity awards696
 147
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
 64
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities18,184
 (126)
Taxes paid on behalf of equity award participants(1,566)
(1,775)
Net cash provided by financing activities2,024
 47,522
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(646) 817
16
 (606)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(37,016) 12,283
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents8,014
 (25,964)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period156,928
 134,508
113,805
 156,928
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$119,912
 $146,791
$121,819
 $130,964
Supplemental cash flow information: 
  
 
  
Cash paid for interest$1,547
 $1,046
$529
 $736
Cash paid for income taxes, net$8,703
 $4,248
$1,386
 $5,407
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6
 

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(in thousands except for share and per share data)
June 30, 2016March 31, 2017

NOTE 1—Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CTS Corporation (“CTS” "we", "our", "us" or “the Company”the "Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes thereto, and other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary for a fair statement, in all material respects, of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.

Change in Estimate

Beginning in January 2017, we changed the method we use to calculate the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. Previously, we calculated the service and interest cost components using a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. In 2017, we began using a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components of benefit cost by applying the specific spot-rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows. This approach better aligns each of the projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve, resulting in a more precise measurement of service and interest costs. The change in method will result in a decrease in the service and interest components of pension costs in 2017. Any decrease to these components as a result of adoption of this approach is equally offset by a decrease in the actuarial losses included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss, with no impact on the measurement of the benefit obligation. This change is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.

Subsequent Events

CTS hasWe have evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
 
Reclassifications
Certain prior period reclassifications have been made in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of including our other post-retirement benefit plan liabilities in Post-retirement obligations as well as the retrospective application of a new accounting pronouncement upon the adoption of ASU 2015-17 (see Note 18 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements for additional details). The chart below quantifies the effects of these reclassification adjustments on our December 31, 2015, financial statements:
  At December 31, 2015
Consolidated Balance Sheet Line Item As previously reported Reclassification adjustment As currently reported
Other current assets $15,888
 $(6,025) $9,863
Deferred income taxes $58,544
 $5,265
 $63,809
Accrued liabilities $(53,905) $6,731
 $(47,174)
Post-retirement obligations $(2,703) $(4,527) $(7,230)
Other long-term obligations $(7,725) $(1,444) $(9,169)


NOTE 2 – Accounts Receivable 
The components of accounts receivable are as follows:
As ofAs of
June 30, December 31,March 31, December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Accounts receivable, gross$62,297
 $54,696
$63,176
 $62,782
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts(172) (133)(160) (170)
Accounts receivable, net$62,125
 $54,563
$63,016
 $62,612








7
 

Table of Contents


NOTE 3 – Inventories 
Inventories consist of the following:
As ofAs of
June 30,
December 31,March 31,
December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Finished goods$5,881
 $6,972
$7,005
 $7,513
Work-in-process8,501
 6,828
11,661
 9,596
Raw materials17,856
 16,991
19,277
 17,680
Less: Inventory reserves(6,260) (6,191)(6,989) (6,137)
Inventories, net$25,978
 $24,600
$30,954
 $28,652

NOTE 4 – Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:
As ofAs of
June 30, December 31,March 31, December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Land$2,330
 $2,401
$2,330
 $2,330
Buildings and improvements63,053
 65,731
63,875
 63,621
Machinery and equipment203,637
 191,212
216,636
 213,198
Less: Accumulated depreciation(192,047) (189,472)(199,573) (197,038)
Property, plant and equipment, net$76,973
 $69,872
$83,268
 $82,111
   
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017  $3,172
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016  $2,926
 


NOTE 5 – Retirement Plans
 
Pension Plans
 
Net pension income for our domestic and foreign plans was as follows:
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended

June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Net pension income$(402) $(530) $(794) $(1,059)
 Three Months Ended

March 31,
March 31,
 2017 2016
Net pension income$(433) $(392)

The components of net pension (income) expense for our domestic and foreign plans include the following: 
Domestic Pension Plans
 Foreign Pension Plans
Domestic Pension Plans
 Foreign Pension Plans

Three Months Ended Three Months EndedThree Months Ended Three Months Ended
June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
March 31,
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Service cost$22
 $42
 $13
 $16
$
 $22
 $12
 $12
Interest cost2,756
 2,815
 11
 124
2,068
 2,756
 8
 11
Expected return on plan assets (1)
(4,744) (5,068) 7
 (134)(4,061) (4,744) (5) 7
Amortization of loss1,498
 1,585
 35
 90
1,446
 1,498
 38
 34
Other cost due to retirement61
 12
 
 
(Income) expense, net$(468) $(626) $66
 $96
$(486) $(456) $53
 $64
 

(1) Expected return on plan assets is net of expected investment expenses and certain administrative expenses.



8
 

Table of Contents

 
Domestic Pension Plans
 Foreign Pension Plans

Six Months Ended Six Months Ended

June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Service cost$44
 $86
 $25
 $33
Interest cost5,512
 5,629
 22
 247
Expected return on plan assets (1)
(9,488) (10,136) 14
 (267)
Amortization of loss2,996
 3,169
 69
 180
Other cost due to retirement12
 
 
 
(Income) expense, net$(924) $(1,252) $130
 $193

(1) Expected return on plan assets is net of expected investment expenses and certain administrative expenses.


Other Post-retirement Benefit Plan
 
Net post-retirement expense for our other post-retirement plan includes the following components:
Three Months Ended
Six Months EndedThree Months Ended

June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016
Other post-retirement benefit plan 
  
  
  
Service cost$1
 $1
 $2
 $2
$1
 $1
Interest cost52
 51
 104
 102
40
 52
Amortization of gain(37) (25) (75) (50)(25) (38)
Post-retirement expense$16
 $27
 $31
 $54
$16
 $15

 
NOTE 6 – Other Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets consist of the following components:
As ofAs of
June 30, 2016March 31, 2017
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net AmountGross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Amount
Amortized intangible assets:     
Customer lists/relationships$63,386
 $(28,643) $34,743
$63,386
 $(31,142) $32,244
Patents10,319
 (10,319) 
10,319
 (10,319) 
Technology and other intangibles36,715
 (6,091) 30,624
36,255
 (7,866) 28,389
In process research and development2,200
 
 2,200
2,200
 
 2,200
Other intangible assets, net$112,620
 $(45,053) $67,567
$112,160
 $(49,327) $62,833



 

 

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016

 $1,522
  
     
Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 
$2,617

 
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017

 $1,536
 

 
 As of
 December 31, 2016
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Amount
Customer lists/relationships$63,386
 $(30,318) $33,068
Patents10,319
 (10,319) 
Technology and other intangibles36,715
 (7,613) 29,102
In process research and development2,200



2,200
Other intangible assets, net$112,620
 $(48,250) $64,370
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 
 $1,095
  


9
 

Table of Contents

 As of
 December 31, 2015
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Amount
Amortized intangible assets:     
Customer lists/relationships$51,804
 $(27,101) $24,703
Patents10,319
 (10,319) 
Technology and other intangibles12,871
 (5,016) 7,855
In process research and development2,200



2,200
Other intangible assets, net$77,194
 $(42,436) $34,758



 

 

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 28, 2015 
 $984
  



 

 

Amortization expense for the six months ended June 28, 2015 
 $1,957
  

Amortization expense remaining for other intangible assets is as follows: 
 Amortization
expense

Amortization
expense
2016$2,933
20175,693
$4,528
20185,573
5,956
20195,564
5,947
20205,564
5,947
20215,867
Thereafter42,240
34,588
Total amortization expense$67,567
$62,833
 


NOTE 7 – Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities
 
Costs associated with exit and restructuring activities are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings as follows: restructuring related charges are recorded as a separate component of Cost of Goods Sold, and restructuring and impairment charges are reported on a separate line and included in Operating Earnings.earnings. 
 
Total restructuring impairment and restructuringcharges, all related chargesto the June 2016 Plan described below, were as follows:
 Three Months Ended
 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $217
Restructuring and impairment charges206
 2,118
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges$206
 $2,335
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $292
Restructuring and impairment charges206
 2,856
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges$206
 $3,148




10
 Three Months Ended
March 31, 2017March 31, 2016
Restructuring and impairment charges777


Table of Contents

In June 2016, CTSwe announced plans to restructure operations by phasing out production at the Elkhart facility by mid-2018 and transitioning it into a research and development center supporting CTS'our global operations ("June 2016 Plan"). Additional organizational changes will also occur in various other locations. The cost of the plan is preliminarily expected to range between $16,000be approximately $12,300 and $18,000, including the severance charges below, however this range may change significantly as we are still in the early stages of estimating the cost of the Plan.will impact approximately 230 employees. The total restructuring liability related to severance and other one-time benefit arrangements under the June 2016 Plan was $196$1,722 at June 30,March 31, 2017 and $1,739 at December 31, 2016. Additional liabilities related to the June 2016 Plan will be accrued following finalization of cost estimates and notification of our plans to the affected employees following negotiations with employee labor representatives.

Total restructuring and impairment charges under the June 2016 Plan were as follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016June 28, 2015
Restructuring and impairment charges206


Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
June 28, 2015
Restructuring and impairment charges206


In April 2014, CTS announced plans to restructure its operations and consolidate its Canadian operations into other existing CTS facilities as part of CTS’ overall plan to simplify its business model and rationalize its global footprint (“April 2014 Plan”). 
During the second quarter of 2015, CTS management revised the April 2014 Plan.  The revision added $4,250 in planned costs.  Additional administrative and legal costs were expected to account for $1,300 of the additional restructuring and impairment charges.  The remaining $2,950 in restructuring related charges are for additional costs related to line movements, asset impairment and equipment relocation, training, travelcharges, and shipping.  

These restructuring actions, which were completed during 2015, resulted in the reduction of approximately 120 positions.other costs will be expensed as incurred.

The following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with the April 2014June 2016 Plan as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017:
   Actual costs
 Planned incurred through
April 2014 PlanCosts June 30, 2016
Inventory write-down$850
 $
Equipment relocation1,800
 444
Other charges1,400
 113
Restructuring-related charges, included in cost of goods sold$4,050
 $557



 

Workforce reduction$4,200
 $4,423
Asset impairment charge
 
Other charges, including pension termination costs1,700
 3,413
Restructuring and impairment charges$5,900
 $7,836



 

Total restructuring, impairment and restructuring related charges$9,950
 $8,393

 
Actual costs
 Planned
incurred through
June 2016 PlanCosts
March 31, 2017
Workforce reduction3,075

2,581
Equipment relocation7,925

822
Other charges1,300

422
Restructuring and impairment charges12,300

3,825






In April 2014, we announced plans to restructure our operations and consolidate our Canadian operations into other existing facilities as part of our overall plan to simplify its business model and rationalize our global footprint (“April 2014 Plan”).  These restructuring actions, which were completed during 2015, impacted approximately 120 positions. The remaining restructuring liability related to the April 2014 Plan was $429 at March 31, 2017 and $423 at December 31, 2016.


1110
 

Table of Contents



Total restructuring, impairment and restructuring related charges under the April 2014 Plan were as follows: 
 Three Months Ended
 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $217
Restructuring and impairment charges
 1,516
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring related charges$
 $1,733
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $217
Restructuring and impairment charges
 1,877
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges$
 $2,094

Total restructuring liability related to the April 2014 Plan was $611 at June 30, 2016.

 In June 2013, CTS announced a restructuring plan to simplify CTS’ global footprint by consolidating manufacturing facilities into existing locations (“June 2013 Plan”).  The June 2013 Plan included the consolidation of operations from the U.K. manufacturing facility into the Czech Republic facility, the Carol Stream, Illinois manufacturing facility into the Juarez, Mexico facility and discontinuing manufacturing at the Singapore facility.   Certain corporate functions were consolidated or eliminated as a result of the June 2013 Plan. These restructuring actions were completed in 2015 and resulted in the reduction of approximately 350 positions.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, CTS management revised the June 2013 Plan.  The revision added $4,000 in planned costs.  Settlement of the U.K. pension plan was expected to account for $2,000 of the added cost.  The remaining $2,000 in restructuring and impairment charges were for severance costs and resulted in the reduction of approximately 130 additional positions throughout CTS businesses. The above actions were completed in 2015.

The following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with the June 2013 Plan and a summary of the actual costs incurred through June 30, 2016:
 
 Actual
 Planned incurred through
June 2013 PlanCosts June 30, 2016
Inventory write-down$800
 $1,143
Equipment relocation900
 1,792
Other charges100
 702
Restructuring-related charges, included in cost of goods sold$1,800
 $3,637



 

Workforce reduction$10,150
 $9,615
Asset impairment charge3,000
 4,139
Other charges, including pension termination costs7,650
 10,205
Restructuring and impairment charges$20,800
 $23,959



 

Total restructuring and restructuring-related charges$22,600
 $27,596


12

Table of Contents

Under the June 2013 Plan, total restructuring, impairment and restructuring related charges incurred were as follows:
 Three Months Ended
 June 30, 2016
June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $
Restructuring and impairment charges
 602
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges$
 $602
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2016 June 28, 2015
Restructuring-related charges$
 $75
Restructuring and impairment charges
 979
Total restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges$
 $1,054

No remaining liability is recorded for the June 2013 Plan as of June 30, 2016.

The following table displays the restructuring liability activity for all plans for the periodthree months ended June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017: 
Combined Plans  
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2016$826
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges, excluding asset impairments and write-offs206
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2017$2,162
Restructuring and impairment charges777
Cost paid(265)(795)
Other activity (1)
$40
7
Restructuring liability at June 30, 2016$807
Restructuring liability at March 31, 2017$2,151
(1) Other activity includes asset impairments, write-offs of property, plant and equipment, the effects of currency translation and other charges that do not flow through restructuring expense.

NOTE 8 – Accrued Liabilities
 
The components of accrued liabilities are as follows: 
As ofAs of
June 30, December 31,March 31, December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Accrued product related costs$4,873
 $5,245
$5,217
 $5,556
Accrued income taxes9,655
 8,845
10,209
 9,826
Accrued property and other taxes1,750
 1,838
1,853
 1,917
Accrued outside commissions1,294
 97
Accrued professional fees1,465
 704
1,341
 1,633
Accrued building improvement costs1,709
 1,768
Dividends payable1,310
 1,302
1,314
 1,309
Remediation reserves19,575
 20,603
17,922
 18,176
Other accrued liabilities5,284
 6,772
4,607
 7,291
Total accrued liabilities$46,915
 $47,174
$42,463
 $45,708


13

Table of Contents

NOTE 9 – Contingencies

Certain processes in the manufacture of CTS'our current and past products create by-products classified as hazardous waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and regulations. CTS haswaste. We have been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies, and in some cases, generator groups of potentially responsible parties, that it is orwe may be a potentially responsible party regarding hazardous substancesliable for environmental contamination at several sites either presently or historicallycurrently and formerly owned leased, or operated by CTS.us. Some sites, are Superfund sites such as in Asheville, North Carolina and Mountain View, California. CTS reservesCalifornia, are designated National Priorities List sites under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund program. We reserve for probable remediation activities and for claims and proceedings against CTSus with respect to other environmental matters. CTS recordsWe record reserves on aan undiscounted basis. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information relating to all such matters, adequate provision for probable and estimable costs have been recorded. We do not have any known environmental obligations where a loss is probable or reasonably possible of occurring for which we do not have a reserve, nor do we have any amounts for which we have not reserved because the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherent nature of environmental obligations, CTSwe cannot provide assurance that itsour ultimate environmental investigation and clean-up costs and liabilitiesliability will not materially exceed the amount of its current reserve. Our reserve and disclosures will be adjusted accordingly if additional information becomes available in the future.
A roll forward of remediation reserves included in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet is comprised of the following:

March 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Balance at beginning of period$18,176

$20,603
Remediation expense97

556
Remediation payments(351)
(2,983)
Balance at end of the period$17,922

$18,176

Unrelated to the environmental claims described above, certain other claims are pending against CTSus with respect to matters arising out of the ordinary conduct of CTS’our business. Although the ultimate outcome of any potential litigation resulting from these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and some may be disposed of unfavorably to CTS, management believesus, we believe that adequate provision for anticipated costs have been established based upon all presently available information. Except as noted herein, we do not believe we have any pending loss contingencies that are probable or reasonably possible of having a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.


11

Table of Contents

NOTE 10 - Debt
 
Long-term debt was comprised of the following:
As ofAs of
June 30,
December 31,March 31,
December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Revolving credit facility due in 2020$110,800
 $90,700
$94,000
 $89,100
Weighted average interest rate1.9% 1.5%2.0% 1.9%
Amount available$187,035
 $106,985
$203,835
 $208,735
Total credit facility$300,000
 $200,000
$300,000
 $300,000
Standby letters of credit$2,165
 $2,315
$2,165
 $2,165
Commitment fee percentage per annum0.30% 0.25%0.25% 0.25%
 
On August 10, 2015, CTSwe entered into a new five-year credit agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of banks (“Revolving Credit Facility”) in order to support CTS’ working capital needs and other general corporate purposes.our financing needs.  The Revolving Credit Facility originally provided for a credit line of $200,000. This Revolving Credit Facility replaced a prior unsecured credit facility.  Borrowings under the previous credit agreement were refinanced under the Revolving Credit Facility and the previous credit agreement was terminated on August 10, 2015. On May 23, 2016, CTSwe requested and received a $100,000 increase in the aggregate revolving credit commitments under its existing credit agreement, which increased the credit line from $200,000 to $300,000.  
 
The Revolving Credit Facility includes a swing line sublimit of $15,000 and a letter of credit sublimit of $10,000.  Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at CTS’our option, at the base rate plus the applicable margin for base rate loans or LIBOR plus the applicable margin for LIBOR loans.  CTSWe also payspay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility.  The commitment fee ranges from 0.20% to 0.40% based on the CTS’our total leverage ratio. 
 
The Revolving Credit Facility requires, among other things, that CTSwe comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility.  CTS wasWe were in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.  The Revolving Credit Facility requires that CTSwe deliver quarterly financial statements, annual financial statements, auditors certifications and compliance certificates within a specified number of days after the end of a quarter and year. Additionally, the Revolving Credit Facility contains restrictions limiting CTS'our ability to: dispose of assets; incur certain additional debt; repay other debt or amend subordinated debt instruments; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in certain transactions with CTS'our subsidiaries and affiliates; and make stock repurchases and dividend payments.  Interest rates on

14

Table of Contents

the Revolving Credit Facility fluctuate based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate and the Company’s quarterly total leverage ratio.  
 
CTS hasWe have debt issuance costs related to itsour long-term debt that areis being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the debt. These costs are included in interest expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Amortization expense was approximately $32$46 and $50$32 for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, and June 28, 2015, respectively, and approximately $70 and $100 for the first six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively. 

Note 11 - Derivative Financial Instruments

Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We selectively use derivative financial instruments including foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to these risks.

The use of derivative financial instruments exposes the Company to credit risk, which relates to the risk of nonperformance by a counterparty to the derivative contracts. We manage our credit risk by entering into derivative contracts with only highly rated financial institutions and by using netting agreements.

Foreign Currency Hedges
In January of 2016, we began using forward contracts to mitigate currency risk related to a portion of our forecasted foreign currency revenues and costs. The currency forward contracts are designed as cash flow hedges and are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. At least quarterly, we assess the effectiveness of these hedging relationships based on the total change in their fair value using regression analysis. The effective portion of derivative gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) until the hedged transaction affects earnings upon settlement, at which time they are reclassified to cost of goods sold or net sales. Ineffectiveness is recorded in other income (expense) in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings. If it becomes probable that an anticipated transaction that is hedged will not occur by the

12

Table of Contents

end of the originally specified time period, we reclassify the gains or losses related to that hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to other income (expenses)(expense).
We continue to monitor the Company’s overall currency exposure and may elect to add cash flow hedges in the future. At June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, we had a net unrealized gain of $77$486 in accumulated other comprehensive income, of which $482 is expected to be reclassified to income within the next 12 months. At March 31, 2016 we had a net unrealized gain of $378 in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts outstanding was $10.8$16.5 million at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.

Interest Rate Swaps
CTS usesWe use interest rate swaps to convert the revolving credit facility’s variable rate of interest into a fixed rate. In the second quarter of 2012, CTS entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four additional interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $25,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2016, we entered into three additional forward-starting interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods August 2017 to August 2020. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the swap agreements will be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense when settled.
These swaps are treated as cash flow hedges and consequently, the changes in fair value were recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The estimated net amount of the existing gains or losses that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that is expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months is approximately $480.$64. 

The location and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, are shown in the following table:
As ofAs of

June 30, December 31,March 31, December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Foreign currency hedges reported in Accrued liabilities$
 $601
Foreign currency hedges reported in Other current assets$34
 $
$522

$
Interest rate swaps reported in Accrued liabilities$(480) $(768)
Interest rate swaps reported in Other current assets$64

$2
Interest rate swaps reported in Other assets$758

$751

The Company has elected to net its foreign currency derivative assets and liabilities in the balance sheet in accordance with ASC 210-20.210-20 (Balance Sheet, Offsetting). On a gross basis, there were foreign currency derivative assets of $107$548 and foreign currency derivative liabilities of $73.



15

Table of Contents

$26.

The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30, June 28, June 30, June 28,March 31, March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017
2016
Foreign Exchange Contracts:          
Loss recognized in Net Sales$(84) $
 $(91) $
$(2) $(7)
Gain recognized in Cost of Goods Sold88
 
 88
 
Gain recognized Selling, General and Administrative expense6
 
 10
 
(Loss) gain recognized in Cost of Goods Sold(144) 1
(Loss) gain recognized in Selling, General and Administrative expense(3) 4
Loss recognized in Other (expenses) income
 
 (1) 
(8) 6
    
 
   
Interest Rate Swaps:    
 
   
Interest Expense$161
 $192
 $313
 $382
Benefit recorded in Interest Expense$
 $152
Total$171
 $192
 $319
 $382
$(157) $156


13

Table of Contents

NOTE 12 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Shareholders’ equity includes certain items classified as accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (“AOCI”) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, including:
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedges relate to interest rate swaps to convert the line of credit’srevolving credit facility's variable rate of interest into a fixed rate and foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates affecting certain revenues and costs denominated in foreign currencies. These hedges are designated as cash flow hedges, and CTS haswe have deferred income statement recognition of gains and losses until the hedged transaction occurs, at which time amounts are reclassified into earnings.  Further information related to CTS’ derivative financial instruments is included in Note 11 - Derivative Financial Instruments and Note 15 – Fair Value Measurements.
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on pension obligations are deferred from income statement recognition until the gains or losses are realized.  Amounts reclassified to income from AOCI are included in net periodic pension expense.income / (expense).  Further information related to CTS’our pension obligations is included in NOTENote 5 – Retirement Plans.
 
Cumulative translation adjustment relates to our non-U.S. subsidiary companies that have designated a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. CTS isWe are required to translate the subsidiary functional currency financial statements to dollars using a combination of historical, period-end, and average foreign exchange rates. This combination of rates creates the foreign currency translation adjustment component of other comprehensive (loss) income.  

Changes in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated are foreign exchange transaction gains or losses. Transaction (losses)/gains for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were $395 and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 were ($1,260) and ($1,491), respectively, andtransaction losses for the three and six month periodsmonths ended June 28, 2015March 31, 2016 were $125 and ($1,563), respectively,$231, which arehave been included in other income/(expenses)income (expense) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings.














The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended March 31, 2017, are as follows:

16
     Gain (Loss)  
 As of Gain (Loss) Reclassified As of
 December 31, Recognized from AOCI March 31,

2016 in OCI to Income 2017
Changes in fair market value of hedges:       
Gross$116
 $1,042
 $150
 $1,308
Income tax benefit(42) (378) (54) (474)
Net74
 664
 96
 834


 
 
 
Changes in unrealized pension cost:       
Gross(151,618) 
 1,296
 (150,322)
Income tax expense (benefit)60,672
 
 (480) 60,192
Net(90,946) 
 816
 (90,130)



 
 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment: 
    
  
Gross(2,414) 86
 
 (2,328)
Income tax expense92
 2
 
 94
Net(2,322) 88
 
 (2,234)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(93,194) $752
 $912
 $(91,530)

14
 

Table of Contents

The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended June 30, 2016, are as follows:
     Gain (Loss)  
 As of Gain (Loss) reclassified As of
 March 31, Recognized from AOCI June 30,

2016 in OCI to income 2016
Changes in fair market value of hedges:       
Gross$(295) $(337) $229
 $(403)
Income tax expense (benefit)110
 127
 (86) 151
Net(185) (210) 143
 (252)


 
 
 
Changes in unrealized pension cost:       
Gross(160,268) 
 1,505
 (158,763)
Income tax expense (benefit)63,818
 
 (558) 63,260
Net(96,450) 
 947
 (95,503)



 
 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment: 
    
  
Gross(1,685) (310) 
 (1,995)
Income tax expense (benefit)108
 (7) 
 101
Net(1,577) (317) 
 (1,894)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(98,212) $(527) $1,090
 $(97,649)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended June 28, 2015,March 31, 2016, are as follows:
    Gain (Loss)      Gain (Loss)  
As of Gain (Loss) reclassified As ofAs of Gain (Loss) Reclassified As of
March 29, Recognized from AOCI June 28,December 31, Recognized from AOCI March 31,

2015 in OCI to income 20152015 in OCI to Income 2016
Changes in fair market value of hedges:  
      
    
Gross$(1,157) $(82) $192
 $(1,047)$(768) $242
 $231
 $(295)
Income tax expense (benefit)435
 31
 (72) 394
289
 (91) (88) 110
Net(722) (51) 120
 (653)(479) 151
 143
 (185)


 
 
 

 
 
 
Changes in unrealized pension cost:              
Gross(167,361) 1,199
 
 (166,162)(161,719) 
 1,451
 (160,268)
Income tax expense (benefit)64,451
 (494) 
 63,957
64,361
 
 (543) 63,818
Net(102,910) 705
 
 (102,205)(97,358) 
 908
 (96,450)
              
Cumulative translation adjustment: 
    
  
 
    
  
Gross(491) 1,064
 
 573
(1,279) (406) 
 (1,685)
Income tax expense (benefit)(42) 427
 
 385
111
 (3) 
 108
Net(533) 1,491
 
 958
(1,168) (409) 
 (1,577)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(104,165) $2,145
 $120
 $(101,900)$(99,005) $(258) $1,051
 $(98,212)










17

Table of Contents

The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, are as follows:
  
 
Gain (Loss)
 
 As of
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
As of
 December 31,
Recognized
from AOCI
June 30,

2015
in OCI
to income
2016
Changes in fair market value of hedges: 
 
 
 
Gross$(768)
$(95)
$460

$(403)
Income tax expense (benefit)289

36

(174)
151
Net(479)
(59)
286

(252)








Changes in unrealized pension cost: 
 
 
 
Gross(161,719)


2,956

(158,763)
Income tax expense (benefit)64,361



(1,101)
63,260
Net(97,358)


1,855

(95,503)

 








Cumulative translation adjustment:


 
 

 
Gross(1,279)
(716)


(1,995)
Income tax expense (benefit)111

(10)


101
Net(1,168)
(726)


(1,894)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(99,005)
$(785)
$2,141

$(97,649)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the six months ended June 28, 2015, are as follows:
     Gain (Loss)  
 As of
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
As of
 December 31,
Recognized
from AOCI
June 28,
 2014
in OCI
to income
2015
Changes in fair market value of hedges: 
 
 
 
Gross$(1,020)
$(409)
$382

$(1,047)
Income tax expense (benefit)384

154

(144)
394
Net(636)
(255)
238

(653)








Changes in unrealized pension cost: 
 
 
 
Gross(169,291)
3,129



(166,162)
Income tax expense (benefit)65,124

(1,167)


63,957
Net(104,167)
1,962



(102,205)











Cumulative translation adjustment: 

 

 

 
Gross245

328



573
Income tax expense (benefit)325

60



385
Net$570

$388

$

$958
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(104,233)
$2,095

$238

$(101,900)



18

Table of Contents

NOTE 13 – Shareholders’ Equity

Share count and par value data related to shareholders’ equity are as follows:
 
As ofAs of
June 30,
December 31,March 31,
December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Preferred Stock      
Par value per shareNo par value
 No par value
No par value
 No par value
Shares authorized25,000,000
 25,000,000
25,000,000
 25,000,000
Shares outstanding
 

 
Common Stock      
Par value per shareNo par value
 No par value
No par value
 No par value
Shares authorized75,000,000
 75,000,000
75,000,000
 75,000,000
Shares issued56,452,983
 56,242,499
56,544,741
 56,456,516
Shares outstanding32,758,961
 32,548,477
32,850,719
 32,762,494
Treasury stock      
Shares held23,694,022
 23,694,022
23,694,022
 23,694,022
 
Through June 30, 2016, CTS had purchased 164,852 shares of common stock for an aggregate of $2,893 under a previously board-authorized share repurchase plan. No common stock repurchases were made during the sixthree months ending June 30, 2016.ended March 31, 2017. Through March 31, 2017, we had purchased an aggregate of $7,446 under a previously board-authorized share repurchase plan allowing for up to $25,000 in stock repurchases. Approximately $17,554 is available for future purchases.


15

Table of Contents

A roll-forward of common shares outstanding is as follows:
Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30, June 28,March 31, March 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Balance at the beginning of the year32,548,477
 33,392,060
32,762,494
 32,548,477
Repurchases
 (626,882)
 
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
 5,200

 
Restricted share issuances210,484
 133,353
88,225
 210,166
Balance at the end of the period32,758,961
 32,903,731
32,850,719
 32,758,643
 
Certain potentially dilutive restricted stock units are excluded from diluted earning per share because they are anti-dilutive. The number of awards that were anti-dilutive at June 30,March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 were 88,592 and June 28, 2015 were 11,600 and 0,83,148, respectively.

NOTE 14 - Equity-BasedStock-Based Compensation
 
At June 30, 2016, CTSMarch 31, 2017, we had four equity-basedactive stock-based compensation plans: the Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Retirement Plan (“Directors’ Plan”), the 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2004 Plan”), the 2009 Omnibus Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (“2009 Plan”), and the 2014 Performance & Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”).  Future grants can only be made under the 2014 Plan.
 
The 2009 Plan, and previously the 2004 Plan, provides for grants of incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to officers, key employees, and non-employee members of CTS’ Board of Directors.  In addition, the 2014 Plan, the 2009 Plan and the 2004 Plan allow for grants of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance shares, performance units, and other stock awards.






19

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the compensation expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings related to equity-basedstock-based compensation plans:
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended

June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016
Service-Based RSUs$436
 $400
 $948
 $949
$550
 $512
Performance-Based RSUs130
 251
 (25) 771
384
 (182)
Market-Based RSUs119
 191
 44
 642
Cash-settled RSUs$(54)
$(48)
Total$685
 $842
 $967
 $2,362
$880
 $282
Income tax benefit$257
 $317
 $363
 $888
$331
 $106

The following table summarizes the unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested RSUs by type and the weighted-average period in which the expense is to be recognized:
Unrecognized
��Unrecognized
 
compensation
Weighted-compensation
Weighted-
expense at
averageexpense at
average

June 30, 2016
periodMarch 31, 2017
period
Service-Based RSUs$2,084

1.4 years$1,790

1.36
Performance-Based RSUs698

1.5 years3,810

2.20
Market-Based RSUs638

1.4 years
Total$3,420

1.4 years$5,600

1.93
 
CTS recognizesWe recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
 
The following table summarizes the maximum number of awards available to be granted under these plans as of June 30, 2016:
 2014 Plan 2009 Plan 2004 Plan Directors' Plan
Awards originally available1,500,000
 3,400,000
 6,500,000
 N/A
Stock options outstanding
 
 
 
Options exercisable
 
 
 
Performance-based options outstanding325,000
 
 
 
Service-based RSUs outstanding257,371
 170,442
 78,947
 25,985
Performance and market-based RSUs outstanding at 200% of target351,300
 86,120
 
 
RSUs vested and released48,339
 
 
 
Awards available for grant517,990
 256,562
 78,947
 25,985
Stock Options
Stock options are exercisable in cumulative annual installments over a maximum 10-year period, commencing at least one year from the date of grant.  Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of CTS’ stock on the date of grant, vest over four years, and have a 10-year contractual life.  The awards generally contain provisions to either accelerate vesting or allow vesting to continue on schedule upon retirement if certain service and age requirements are met.   The awards also provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control event. CTS has no stock options exercisable or outstanding as of June 30, 2016, other than the performance-based stock options described below.





2016
 

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the status of these plans as of March 31, 2017:
 2014 Plan 2009 Plan 2004 Plan Directors' Plan
Awards originally available1,500,000
 3,400,000
 6,500,000
 N/A
Performance-based options outstanding315,000
 
 
 
Maximum potential RSU and cash settled awards outstanding747,417
 156,022
 78,947
 25,985
Maximum potential awards outstanding1,062,417
 156,022
 78,947
 25,985
RSUs and cash settled awards vested and released157,212
 
 
 
Awards available for grant280,371
 
 
 
Stock Options

We have no stock options exercisable or outstanding as of March 31, 2017, other than the performance-based stock options described below.
Performance-Based Stock Options

During the second quarters of 2015 and 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) granted a total of 325,000350,000 performance-based stock option awards (“Performance-Based Option Awards”) for certain CTS employees under the 2014 Plan.Plan, of which 315,000 remain outstanding after considering forfeitures.  The Performance-Based Option Awards have an exercise price of $18.37, a term of five years, and generally will become exercisable (provided the optionee remains employed by CTSthe Company or an affiliate) upon CTS’our attainment of at least $600,000 in revenues during any of CTS’our four-fiscal-quarter trailing periods (as determined by the Committee) during the term.  CTS hasWe have not recognized any expense on these Performance-Based Option Awards for the six monthsthree-month periods ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016, since the revenue target iswas not deemed likely to be attained based on our current forecast.
Service-Based Restricted Stock Units
 
Service-based RSUs entitleThe following table summarizes the holder to receive one shareservice-based RSU activity as of common stockand for each unit when the unit vests.  RSUs are issued to officers, key employees and non-employee directors as compensation.  Generally, the RSUs vest over a three-year period.  RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest one month after the grant date.  Upon grant, each non-employee director elects to either receive the stock associated with the RSU immediately upon vesting, or defer receipt of the stock until his or her retirement from the Board of Directors.  The fair value of the RSUs is equivalent to the trading value of CTS’ common stock on the grant date.
A summary of the status of RSUs granted under the 2004, 2009, and 2014 plans is presented below:three months ended March 31, 2017: 
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2016
 Units Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2016471,196
 $13.27
Granted164,922
 13.97
Vested and released(97,298) 14.39
Forfeited(32,060) 17.05
Outstanding at June 30, 2016506,760
 $13.13
Releasable at June 30, 2016277,749
 $11.33
A summary of the status of RSUs granted under the Director's Plan is presented below:
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2016
 Units Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 201633,974

$11.75
Granted


Vested and released(7,989)
11.75
Forfeited


Outstanding at June 30, 201625,985

$11.75
Releasable at June 30, 201625,985

$11.75

Performance and Market-Based Restricted Stock Units
CTS grants performance-based restricted stock unit awards to certain executives. Vesting may occur in the amount of zero percent to 200% of the grant target.  Vesting is subject to certification of the financial results for the last year in the performance period by CTS’ independent auditors. The number of awards vesting is dependent upon CTS’ achievement of either sales growth targets or cash flow targets as defined in the agreements.
 Three Months Ended
 March 31, 2017
 Units Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017554,478
 $13.37
Granted33,040
 23.00
Vested and released(114,847) 15.11
Forfeited(2,536) 17.46
Outstanding at March 31, 2017470,135
 $13.59
Releasable at March 31, 2017304,883
 $11.38
 


21









17
 

Table of Contents

CTS grants market-based restricted stock unit awards to certain executivesPerformance and key employees. Vesting may occur in the amount of zero percent to 200% of the grant target.  Vesting is subject to certification of the financial results for the last year of the target range by CTS’ independent auditors.  The number of awards vesting is determined using a matrix based on a percentile ranking of CTS' total stockholder return with a peer group total shareholder return over the three-year period comprising the performance period. Vesting is tied exclusively to CTS' total stockholder return relative to peer group companies’ total stockholder return rates during the performance period.  Market-Based Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the performance and market-based RSU activity as of and for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017:
 Units Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2016, at target249,560
 14.59
Granted, at target108,650
 13.56
Attained by performance97,017
 10.48
Vested and released(234,517) 10.52
Forfeited, at target(9,000) 17.14
Outstanding at June 30, 2016, at target211,710
 16.58
Maximum potential units outstanding at June 30, 2016437,420
 16.63
 Units Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017201,900
 $16.48
Granted123,919
 23.83
Attained by performance15,285
 21.66
Released(41,264) 21.66
Forfeited(15,070) 21.66
Outstanding at March 31, 2017284,770
 $18.99
Releasable at March 31, 20172,011
 $21.66

The following table summarizes each grant of performance awards outstanding at March 31, 2017.
DescriptionGrant DateVesting YearVesting DependencyTarget Units OutstandingMaximum Number of Units to be Granted
2015 - 2017 Performance RSUsFebruary 5, 2015201735% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow62,000
124,000
2016 - 2018 Performance RSUsFebruary 16, 2016201835% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow92,840
185,680
2017 - 2019 Performance RSUsFebruary 9, 2017201935% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow78,341
156,682
2017 - 2019 Performance RSUsFebruary 9, 20172018 - 2020Operating Income45,578
45,578
Single Crystal Performance RSUsMarch 31, 20162018Various4,000
8,000

Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units

Cash-Settled RSUs entitle the holder to receive the cash equivalent of one share of common stock for each unit when the unit vests. These RSUs are issued to key employees residing in foreign locations as direct compensation. Generally, these RSUs vest over a three-year period. Cash-Settled RSUs are classified as liabilities and are remeasured at each reporting date until settled. At March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 we had 16,285 and 12,074 cash-settled RSUs outstanding, respectively. At March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, liabilities of $115 and $46, respectively were included in Accrued liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE 15 — Fair Value Measurements
 
CTS usesWe use interest rate swaps to convert our line of credit’srevolving credit facility’s variable rate of interest into a fixed rate and foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the effect of foreign currency changes on certain revenues and costs denominated in foreign currencies. These derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. 

18

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes CTS’our financial assets (liabilities) that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017:
  Quoted       Quoted     
  Prices     
 Prices     
  in Active Significant   Asset in Active Significant   
Carrying Markets for Other Significant Carrying Markets for Other Significant 
Value at Identical Observable Unobservable Value at Identical Observable Unobservable 
June 30, Instruments Inputs Inputs March 31, Instruments Inputs Inputs 

2016 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 2017 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 
Interest rate swaps$(480) $
 $(480) $
 $822
 $
 $822
 $
 
Foreign currency hedges$34
 $
 $34
 $
 $522
 $
 $522
 $
 
 
The table below summarizes the financial liabilityassets (liabilities) that waswere measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015:2016:
   Quoted     
   Prices     
   in Active Significant   
 Carrying Markets for Other Significant 
 Value at Identical Observable Unobservable 
 December 31, Instruments Inputs Inputs 

2015 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 
Interest rate swaps$(768) $
 $(768) $
 
   Quoted    
 Asset Prices    
 (Liability) in Active Significant  
 Carrying Markets for Other Significant
 Value at Identical Observable Unobservable
 December 31, Instruments Inputs Inputs

2016 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Interest rate swaps$753
 $
 $753
 $
Foreign currency hedges$(601)
$

$(601)
$
 
The fair value of our interest rate swaps and foreign currency hedges were measured using standard valuation models using market-based observable inputs over the contractual terms, including forward yield curves, among others. There is a readily determinable market for these derivative instruments, but that market is not active and therefore they are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

22

Table of Contents

The table below provides a reconciliation of the recurring financial assets (liabilities) for our derivative instruments:
   Foreign
 Interest Currency

Rate Swaps Hedges
Balance at January 1, 2015$(1,020) $
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings768
 
Unrealized gains (losses)(516) 
Balance at December 31, 2015$(768) $
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings472
 3
Unrealized gains (losses)(184) 31
Balance at June 30, 2016$(480) $34
   Foreign
 Interest Currency

Rate Swaps Hedges
Balance at January 1, 2016$(768) $
Settled in cash

54
Included in earnings928
 (18)
Included in other comprehensive earnings593
 (637)
Balance at December 31, 2016$753
 $(601)
Settled in cash

(157)
Included in earnings
 157
Included in other comprehensive earnings69
 1,123
Balance at March 31, 2017$822
 $522
 
CTS'Our long-term debt consists of the Revolving Credit Facility which is recorded at its carrying value. There is a readily determinable market for CTS'our long-term debt and it is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the market is not deemed to be active. The fair value of long-term debt approximates carrying value and was determined by valuing a similar hypothetical coupon bond and attributing that value to our long-term debt under the Revolving Credit Facility.


2319
 

Table of Contents

NOTE 16 — Income Taxes
The effective tax rates for the first quarterthree-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,
 2016
2015 2016
2015
Effective tax rate34.7% (75.7)% 34.5% (27.7)%
 Three Months Ended
 March 31,
March 31,
 2017
2016
Effective tax rate30.6% 34.3%
 
CTS'Our effective income tax rate for was 34.7%30.6% and (75.7)%34.3% in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The tax rate in the secondfirst quarter 2017 was lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate due primarily to tax benefits recorded upon vesting of restricted stock units and first six months of 2016 reflected the change in the mix offavorable tax rates on foreign earnings, offset by jurisdiction, the impact of discrete items, the company’s decision to no longer permanently reinvest the earnings of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries, andstate taxes, tax expense for withholding taxes on the anticipated distribution of earnings in China, that are not anticipated to be maintained in China. CTS began recording tax expense for withholding taxes in China in the fourth quarter of 2015 and expects to continue this practice going forward. During the second quarter and first six months of 2015, CTS reflected a benefit attributable to filing amended U.S. federal tax returns in order to take credits for foreign taxes paid which was partially offset by a reserve recorded on an uncertain tax position.other various permanent items.
 
CTS’Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. For the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2017, and March 31, 2016, we recorded $176 and June 28, 2015, CTS accrued $186 and $820$184, respectively, of interest or penalties in income tax expense.  

Note 17 - Business Combinations

On March 11, 2016, CTSwe acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in CTG Advanced Materials, LLC (“CTG-AM”), a privately-held company, for $73 million in cash plus a working capital adjustment. CTG-AM, formerly operated as H.C. Materials, is the market leading designer and manufacturer of single crystal piezoelectric materials, serving major original equipment manufacturers throughout the medical marketplace. These materials enable high definition ultrasound imaging (3D and 4D), as well as intravascular ultrasound applications. Other applications for these materials include wireless pacemakers, implantable hearing aids, and defense technologies.

With the CTG-AM acquisition, CTS gainswe gain technology and proprietary manufacturing methods that expand its offering of piezoelectric materials. This allows CTSus to become the leading large-scale commercial producer of both single crystal materials and traditional piezoelectric ceramics.
The purchase price of $73,063, net of cash acquired of $4, has been allocated to the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired as of March 11, 2016.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
  Fair Values at March 11, 2016
Current assets $4,215
Property, plant and equipment 6,173
Other assets 37
Goodwill 27,879
Intangible assets 35,427
Fair value of assets acquired 73,731
Less fair value of liabilities acquired (668)
Net cash paid $73,063

Goodwill represents value the Company expects to be created by combining the operations of the acquired business with the Company's operations, including the expansion into markets within our existing business, access to new customers, and potential cost savings and synergies. Goodwill related to the acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.


The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and weighted average lives of the acquired intangible assets:

2420
 

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and weighted average lives of the acquired intangible assets:
Intangible Asset TypeFair Value Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)Fair Value Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
Developed Technology$23,730
 15.0$23,730
 15.0
Customer Relationships and Contracts11,502
 14.611,502
 14.6
Other195
 0.8195
 0.8
Total$35,427
  $35,427
 14.8
CTS
We incurred $804 in transaction related costs during in the six monthsyear ended June 30,December 31, 2016. These costs are included in selling, general, and administrative costs in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

Results of operations for CTG -AMCTG-AM are included in our consolidated condensed financial statements beginning on March 11, 2016. The amount of net sales and net loss from CTG-AM sincein the acquisition datequarter ended March 31, 2016 that have been included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings are as follows:
  For the period
March 11, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
Net sales $3,876
Net loss $111
Supplemental Pro Forma Information
The unaudited pro forma amounts below include CTG-AM's revenues and earnings that would have been included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings had the acquisition date been January 1, 2015.

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended

June 30, June 28, June 30, June 28,

2016 2015 2016 2015
Net sales$98,693
 $103,689
 $197,710
 $205,290
Net earnings$14,487
 $19,640
 $22,249
 $26,298


 
 
 
Earnings per share:
 
 
 
Basic$0.44
 $0.59
 $0.68
 $0.79
Diluted$0.44
 $0.59
 $0.67
 $0.78

The pro forma results have been prepared for informational purposes only and include adjustments to amortize acquired intangible assets with finite life, reflect additional interest expense on debt used to fund the acquisition, and to record the tax consequences of the pro forma adjustments. Included in the pro forma results are nonrecurring expenses for transaction costs of $0 and $804 and additional cost of goods sold of $750 and $1,151 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 for inventory recognized at fair value as a result of acquisition-related adjustments.
  For the period
March 11, 2016
through
March 31, 2016
Net sales $758
Net earnings $(64)

NOTE 18 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2016-92017-07 "Compensation-Stock Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 718)715): Improvement to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting"Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost"
In March 2016,2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”2017-07 "Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost". This ASU simplifiesis meant to improve the presentation of net periodic pension and net periodic post-retirement benefits costs. Currently, pension and post-retirement benefit costs are comprised of several components reflecting the different aspects of an employer's financial arrangements and cost of providing benefits to employees. These components are aggregated for reporting, but prior guidance does not prescribe where the accounting for share-based payment transactions, includingnet cost should be presented in the income tax consequences, forfeitures, classificationstatement or capitalized in assets. This ASU requires disaggregation of awards as either equity or liabilities,the service cost component from other components of net benefit cost and classificationprovides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost and other components in the income statement, allowing only the service cost component of cash flows. The guidancenet benefit costs to be eligible for capitalization. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016,2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted. Anpermitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. These amendments should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost and other components of net periodic pension and net post-retirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost and net periodic pension cost and periodic post-retirement benefit in assets. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements because the service cost component of our pension cost is expected to be immaterial to our financial results on a prospective basis.
ASU 2017-04 "Intangibles -Goodwill and Other (Topic 305): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment"
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 305): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". This ASU is meant to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill for impairment by eliminating the current Step 2 analysis in computing the implied fair value of goodwill. In addition, this ASU requires an entity that electsto consider income tax effects on any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring an impairment loss, if applicable. Under this ASU, impairment is determined by comparing the reporting unit's fair value to the carrying value. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption of the amendmentpermitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We do not expect this guidance to have an impact on our financial statements.

2521
 

Table of Contents

ASU 2017-01 "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of Business"
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of Business". This ASU is meant to clarify the definition of a business to add guidance when determining when an acquisition or disposal should be accounted for as a sale of assets or business. This ASU provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets or activities should be classified as a business, providing more consistency in accounting for business or asset acquisitions. This ASU is effective for public companies, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The ASU will be applied prospectively.
ASU 2016-16 "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory"
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory". This ASU is meant to improve the accounting for the income tax effect of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Currently, US GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers until the asset is sold to a third party. This ASU will now require companies to recognize the income tax effect of an intra-entity asset transfer (other than inventory) when the transaction occurs. This ASU is effective for public companies, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted and is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-15 "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments"
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". This ASU reduces the diversity in reporting of eight specific cash flow issues due to accounting guidance that is unclear or does not exist. The eight issues relate to certain debt activities, business combination activities, insurance settlements and other various activities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and is to be applied retrospectively using a transition method for each period presented. An entity that elects early adoption of the amendment under this ASU must adopt all aspects of the amendment in the same period. We are currently evaluating theThis guidance is not expected to have a material impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-5 "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships"
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-5 "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships". This amendment clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument does not on its own require dedesignation of the hedging instrument under Topic 815, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria (including those in paragraphs 815-20-35-14 through 35-18) continue to be met. This update can be applied prospectively or retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. This update is not expected to have an impact to our financial statements.

ASU 2016-22016-02 "Leases (Topic 842)"
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2,2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)". This amendment created a new Topic under the accounting standards codification to account for the provisions of the ASU. This amendment is meant to provide transparency and to improve comparability between entities. The ASU requires companies to record an asset and liability toon the balance sheet for leases that were formerly designated as operating leases as well as leases designated as financing leases. The provisions of the ASU predominately change the recognition of leases for lessees, the provisions do not substantially change the accounting for lessors. This ASU will supersede the provisions of Topic 840 Leases.
The liability recorded for a lease is meant to recognize the lease payments and the asset as a right to use the underlying asset for the lease, including optional periods if it is reasonably certain the option will be exercised. Recording of the liability should be based on the present value of the lease payments. If a lease term is less than twelve month,months, a company is allowed to elect not to record the asset and liability. Expense related to these leases are to be amortized straight-line over the expected term of the lease.
Additionally, the provisions of this ASU provide additional guidance on separating lease terms from maintenance and other type of provisions that provide a good or service, accounting for sale-leaseback provisions, and leveraged leases.
Reporting in the cash flow statement remains virtually unchanged as the lease payments will continue to be recognized within financing activities and the change in interest within operating activities. Reporting for operating leases remain within operating activities.unchanged. Additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required.
These updates are required to be applied under a modified retrospective approach from the beginning of the earlier period presented. The modified approach provides optional practical expedients that may be elected, which will allow companies to continue to account for leases under the previous guidance for leases that commenced prior to the effective date.
The provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is allowed. The provisionsWe have not yet commenced the process for evaluating the impact of this guidance are still being evaluatedASU on our financial statements, and thetherefore it's impact on CTS' financial statements has not yet been determined.
ASU 2015-17, 2014-09“Income Taxes, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”606)"
In November 2015,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, "Income Taxes2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes"606)". The amendment requires Company'sguidance in this ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to begin classifying all deferred income taxes as non-current.transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The provisions are expected to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and align the presentation of deferred income taxesnew revenue recognition guidance more closely aligns U.S. GAAP with the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The update can be applied prospectively or retrospectively.
The Company early adopted the above guidance on January 1, 2016 and elected to retrospectively apply its provisions. This resulted in reclassification of the amounts in our December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet as shown in Note 1 - Basis of Presentation.
ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”
In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments of Inventory". The amendments clarify that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer needs to record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income as a result of the change to the provisional amounts as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This amendment requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current period earnings by line item, as if the provisional adjustments had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This ASU became effective for CTS on January 1, 2016 and its provisions did not have an impact on our financial statements.

2622
 

Table of Contents

ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)"("IFRS"). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
Step 1:Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Step 2:Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3:Determine the transaction price.
Step 4:Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 5:Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, "Accounting2015-14: Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". The amended guidance deferred the effective date of the ASU 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers(Topic 606)" 2014-9 to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within that reporting period.those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that annual period.those fiscal years. In addition, in April 2016 the FASBfour other ASUs have been issued amending and clarifying ASU 2014-09 and must be adopted concurrently.
ASU 2016-08 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
ASU 2016-10 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers:Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (Topic 606)", which amends the revenue guidance on identifying performance obligations and accounting for intellectual property licenses. In May 2016, the FASB issued Licensing"
ASU 2016-12 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers:Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical ExpedientsExpedients"
ASU 2016-20 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)", which provides additional guidance in assessing whether a transaction meets the definition of revenue, in narrowed circumstances during the transition to ASU 2014-09: Technical Corrections and subsequent to implementation. Improvements"
This update can either be applied under either a cumulative effect or retrospective method. ASU 2016-10We are in the process of reviewing customer contracts and ASU 2016-12 mustagreements to determine the potential effects of the standard based on our revenue streams and current revenue recognition practices. Following review of customer contracts, we will summarize contract terms, reference the findings to the applicable new guidance, determine the financial statement impact, and then update policies and controls to ensure application of the new provisions will be adopted concurrently with ASU 2014-09. Theapplied consistently throughout the Company. While the impact of the adoption of this ASU 2014-9 on our financial statements has not yet been determined.determined, we expect there to be minor differences in the timing of revenue recognition, due primarily to changes in how variable consideration is estimated. The Company expects to adopt the provisions of this standard using the modified retrospective approach, which requires a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption. The Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018.


2723
 

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)
(in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts)
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes included under Item 1, as well as our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.
Overview
CTS Corporation (“CTS”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is a leading designer and manufacturer of products that Sense, Connect and Move. CTS manufacturesWe manufacture sensors, actuators and electronic components in North America, Europe, and Asia, and suppliessupply these products to OEMs in the aerospace, communications, defense, industrial, information technology, medical and transportation markets.
Results of Operations: SecondFirst Quarter 20162017 versus SecondFirst Quarter 20152016
 
The following table highlights changes in significant components of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the quarters ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, and June 28, 2015:March 31, 2016:
 
 Three Months Ended   Percent of Percent of
 June 30, June 28, Percent Net Sales –  Net Sales – 
 2016 2015 Change 2016 2015
Net sales$98,693
 $100,071
 (1.4) 100.0
 100.0
Cost of goods sold(1)
64,236
 66,698
 (3.7) 65.1
 66.7
Gross margin34,457
 33,373
 3.2
 34.9
 33.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses15,764
 15,224
 3.5
 16.0

15.2
Research and development expenses5,967
 5,487
 8.7
 6.0

5.5
Restructuring and impairment charges206
 2,118
 (90.3) 0.2

2.1
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(11,577) 2
 (578,950.0) (11.7) 
Total operating expenses10,360
 22,831
 (54.6) 10.5
 22.8
Operating earnings24,097
 10,542
 128.6
 24.4

10.5
Total other (expense) income(1,918) 317
 (705.0) (1.9)
0.3
Earnings before income taxes22,179
 10,859
 104.2
 22.5
 10.8
Income tax expense (benefit)7,692
 (8,221) (193.6) 7.8

(8.2)
Net earnings$14,487
 $19,080
 (24.1) 14.7
 19.0
Earnings per share:         
Diluted net earnings per share$0.44
 $0.57
      
(1) Cost of goods sold includes restructuring related charges of $0 in 2016 and $75 in 2015.
 Three Months Ended   Percent of Percent of
 March 31, March 31, Percent Net Sales –  Net Sales – 
 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016
Net sales$100,154
 $96,705
 3.6
 100.0 100.0
Cost of goods sold65,930
 63,237
 4.3
 65.8 65.4
Gross margin34,224
 33,468
 2.3
 34.2 34.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses15,246
 14,872
 2.5
 15.2
15.4
Research and development expenses6,003
 6,163
 (2.6) 6.0
6.4
Restructuring and impairment charges777
 
 
 0.8

Loss (gain) on sale of assets2
 (3) 
  
Total operating expenses22,028
 21,032
 4.7
 22.0 21.8
Operating earnings12,196
 12,436
 (1.9) 12.2
12.9
Total other income (expense)29
 (471) (106.2) 
(0.5)
Earnings before income taxes12,225
 11,965
 2.2
 12.2 12.4
Income tax expense3,741
 4,102
 (8.8) 3.7
4.2
Net earnings$8,484
 $7,863
 7.9
 8.5 8.2
Earnings per share:         
Diluted net earnings per share$0.25
 $0.24
      
 
Sales of $98,693$100,154 in the secondfirst quarter of 2016 decreased $1,3782017 increased $3,449 or (1.4)%3.6% from the secondfirst quarter of 2015.2016. Sales to automotive markets decreased $2,061 due to lowerincreased $242 driven by higher volumes andwhich were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange impact.  Other sales increased $683$3,207 due to the addition of sales from the single crystal acquisition which was partially offset by lowerand higher demand for electronic components in certain end markets.  Changes in foreign exchange rates caused $398 of the totalreduced sales decrease, driven by $853 year-over-year due to the U.S. Dollar appreciating compared to the Chinese Renminbi and Euro and relating mostly to sales of automotive products.
Gross margin as a percent of sales was 34.9%34.2% in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 compared to 33.3%34.6% in the secondfirst quarter of 2015.2016. The increasedecrease in gross margin resulted from cost savings from continued efficiency gains, material and labor productivity projects, savings from restructuring projects andwas driven mainly by certain production rework issues that were resolved during the addition of sales from the single crystal acquisition. In addition, foreign exchange rates had a favorable impact on manufacturing costs as the U.S. Dollar appreciated against various local currencies in countries in which we have manufacturing operations.quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $15,764$15,246 or 16.0%15.2% of sales in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 versus $15,224$14,872 or 15.2%15.4% of sales in the comparable quarter of 2015.2016. The increase iswas primarily attributable to addedincremental costs as a result ofresulting from the 2016 single crystal acquisition, including amortization of intangibles. Sellingintangibles, and marketingthe timing of certain expenses.
Research and development expenses were also higher as CTS continues$6,003 or 6.0% of sales in the first quarter of 2017 compared to $6,163 or 6.4% of sales in the comparable quarter of 2016. The decrease was due to timing of projects, which relate to our continued investment in new

2824
 

Table of Contents

invest to drive future growth. The increases were partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses in other parts of the business.
Research and development expenses were $5,967 or 6.0% of sales in the second quarter of 2016 compared to $5,487 or 5.5% of sales in the comparable quarter of 2015. The increase was related to continued investment in new products to drive organic growth. Research and development expenses are focused on expanded applications of existing products and new product development as well as current product and process enhancements. 
Restructuring and impairment charges were $206$777 or 0.2%0.8% of sales in the secondfirst quarter 2016 compared to $2,118 or 2.1% of sales in the second quarter of 2015.2017. The 2016 charges are mainly for severance, equipment relocation and travel costs related to the restructuring of certain operations as part of the 2016 Restructuring Plan announced in June 2016. The 2015There were no restructuring and impairment charges consist primarily of accruals for severance costs related toin the consolidation of CTS' Canadian operation in Streetsville, Ontario into other CTS facilities.
The gain on sale of assets is driven primarily by the gain on sale of the building in Canada in June 2016.comparable prior year quarter.
Operating earnings were $24,097$12,196 or 24.4%12.2% of sales in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 compared to operating earnings of $10,542$12,436 or 10.5%12.9% of sales in the comparable quarter of 20152016 as a result of the items discussed above.
Other income and expense items are summarized in the following table:
Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Interest expense$(1,009) $(653)$(684) $(820)
Interest income331
 853
253
 547
Other (expense) income, net(1,240) 117
Total other (expense) income$(1,918) $317
Other income (expense)460
 (198)
Total other income (expense)$29
 $(471)
Interest expense increaseddecreased in the secondfirst quarter of 2017 versus the same quarter of 2016 versus the second quarter of 2015primarily as a result of higher borrowingsa reduction in interest related to the single crystal acquisition.interest rate swaps.  Interest income decreased due to lower cash balances. Other expenseincome in the secondfirst quarter of 2016 is largely the result of2017 was principally driven by foreign currency translation losses, primarilygains, mainly due to the appreciationdepreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi. Other income inRenminbi and Euro during the second quarter of 2015 was driven by foreign currency translation gains.quarter.
 
 Three Months Ended
 June 30, June 28,
 2016 2015
Effective tax rate34.7% (75.7)%
 Three Months Ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2017 2016
Effective tax rate30.6% 34.3%
 
CTS'Our effective income tax rate was 34.7%30.6% and (75.7)% in the second quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively. The tax rate in the second quarter of 2016 reflected the change in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, the impact of discrete items, the company’s decision to no longer permanently reinvest the earnings of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries and tax expense for withholding taxes on earnings in China that are not anticipated to be maintained in China. CTS began recording tax expense for withholding taxes in China in the fourth quarter of 2015 and expects to continue this practice going forward. During the second quarter of 2015, CTS reflected a benefit attributable to filing amended U.S. federal tax returns in order to take credits for foreign taxes paid which was partially offset by a reserve recorded on an uncertain tax position.













29

Table of Contents

Results of Operations: Six months ended June 30, 2016 versus Six months ended June 30, 2015
The following table highlights changes in significant components of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and June 28, 2015:
 Six Months Ended   Percent of Percent of
 June 30, June 28, Percent Net Sales –  Net Sales – 
 2016 2015 Change 2016 2015
Net sales$195,398
 $198,382
 (1.5) 100.0
 100.0
Cost of goods sold(1)
127,472
 132,873
 (4.1) 65.2
 67.0
Gross margin67,926
 65,509
 3.7
 34.8
 33.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses30,411
 30,935
 (1.7) 15.6
 15.6
Research and development expenses12,130
 10,686
 13.5
 6.2
 5.4
Restructuring and impairment charges206
 2,856
 (92.8) 0.1
 1.4
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(11,351) (1) 1,135,000.0
 (5.8) 
Total operating expenses31,396
 44,476
 (29.4) 16.1
 22.4
Operating earnings36,530
 21,033
 73.7
 18.7
 10.6
Total other (expense) income(2,386) (1,170) 103.9
 (1.2) (0.6)
Earnings before income taxes34,144
 19,863
 71.9
 17.5
 10.0
Income tax expense (benefit)11,794
 (5,504) (314.3) 6.0
 (2.8)
Net earnings$22,350
 $25,367
 (11.9) 11.4
 12.8
Earnings per share:         
Diluted net earnings per share$0.67
 $0.75
      
(1) Cost of goods sold includes restructuring related charges of $0 in 2016 and $75 in 2015.
Sales of $195,398 in the six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased $2,984 or (1.5)% from the six months ended June 28, 2015. Sales to automotive markets decreased $1,461 due to lower volumes and unfavorable foreign exchange impact.  Other sales declined $1,523 due to lower demand for electronic components in certain end markets, which was partially offset by the addition of sales from the single crystal acquisition.  Changes in foreign exchange rates caused $1,097 of the total sales decrease, driven by the U.S. Dollar appreciating compared to the Chinese Renminbi and relating mostly to sales of automotive products.
Gross margin as a percent of sales was 34.8%34.3% in the first halfquarter of 2017 and 2016, compared to 33.0%respectively. The decrease in the first half of 2015. The increase in gross margin resulted from cost savings from continued efficiency gains, material and labor productivity projects, savings from restructuring projects and the addition of sales from the single crystal acquisition. In addition, foreign exchange rates had atax rate was primarily driven by favorable impact on manufacturing costs as the U.S. Dollar appreciated against various local currencies in countries in which we have manufacturing operations.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $30,411 or 15.6% of sales in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 versus $30,935 or 15.6% of sales in the comparable year-to-date period in 2015. Expenses in 2016 include added costsdiscrete tax items, largely as a result of the single crystal acquisition, including amortizationtax benefits recorded upon vesting of intangibles. Selling and marketing expenses were higher as CTS continues to invest to drive future growth. The increases were offset by lower general and administrative expenses in other parts of the business.
Research and development expenses were $12,130 or 6.2% of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $10,686 or 5.4% of sales in the comparable prior year period. The increase was related to continued investment in new products to drive organic growth. Research and development expenses are focused on expanded applications of existing products and new product development as well as current product and process enhancements. 
Restructuring and impairment charges were $206 or 0.1% of sales in the first half of 2016 compared to $2,856 or 1.4% of sales in the first half of 2015. The 2016 charges are for severance costs related to the restructuring of certain operations as part of the 2016 Restructuring Plan announced in June 2016. The 2015 charges consist primarily of accruals for severance costs related to the consolidation of CTS' Canadian operation in Streetsville, Ontario into other CTS facilities. The information as set forth under Note 7, Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities, in the condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report is incorporated herein by reference.
The gain on sale of assets is driven primarily by the gain on sale of the building in Canada in June 2016.

30

Table of Contents

Operating earnings were $36,530 or 18.7% of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to operating earnings of $21,033 or 10.6% of sales in the six months ended June 28, 2015 as a result of the items discussed above.
Other income and expense items are summarized in the following table:
 Six Months Ended
 June 30,
June 28,
 2016 2015
Interest expense$(1,829) $(1,241)
Interest income879
 1,641
Other expense, net(1,436) (1,570)
Total other expense$(2,386) $(1,170)
Interest expense increased in the first half of 2016 versus the first half of 2015 as a result of higher borrowings related primarily to the single crystal acquisition.  Interest income decreased due to lower cash balances.  Other expense in the first half of 2016 is largely the result of foreign currency translation losses, primarily due to the appreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi. Other expense in the second half of 2015 was also driven by foreign currency translation losses, primarily due to the appreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Euro.
 Six Months Ended
 June 30, June 28,
 2016 2015
Effective tax rate34.5%
(27.7)%
CTS' effective income tax rate was 34.5% and (27.7)% in the first six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively. The tax rate in the first six months of 2016 reflected the change in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, the impact of discrete items, the company’s decision to no longer permanently reinvest the earnings of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries, and tax expense for withholding taxes on earnings in China that are not anticipated to be maintained in China. CTS began recording tax expense for withholding taxes in China in the fourth quarter of 2015 and expects to continue this practice going forward. In the first six months of 2015, the tax rate reflected a benefit attributable to filing amended U.S. federal tax returns in order to take credits for foreign taxes paid which was partially offset by a reserve recorded on an uncertain tax position.

restricted stock units.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents were $119,912$121,819 at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017, and $156,928$113,805 at December 31, 2015,2016, of which $118,608$120,239 and $ 156,310,$112,736, respectively, were held outside the United States. The decreaseincrease in cash and cash equivalents of $37,016$8,014 was primarily driven by cash used in investinggenerated from operating activities of $68,309, which included a payment for a business acquisition in the amount of $73,063, capital expenditures of $7,483 and proceeds from the sale of assets of $12,237, offset by net borrowings on our credit facility of $20,100 and cash generated from operations of $13,755.$9,779. Total long-term debt was $110,800$94,000 as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and $90,700$89,100 as of December 31, 2015.2016. Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, defined as the sum of notes payable and long-term debt as a percentage of total debt and shareholders' equity, was 26.8%22.6% at June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, compared to 24.4%22.1% at December 31, 2015.2016.

Working capital decreasedincreased by $27,957$16,646 during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, primarily due to the aforementioned decreasean increase in cash and cash equivalents partially offset byof $8,014 and a $7,562 increasedecrease in accounts receivable.  accrued liabilities of $7,024.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $13,755$9,779 during the first sixthree months of 2016.2017. Components of net cash provided by operating activities included net earnings of $22,350,$8,484, depreciation and amortization expense of $8,925, and equity-based$4,708, stock-based compensation of $967 offset by amortization of retirement benefit adjustments of $794, net changes in assets and liabilities of $9,468$880 and other non-cash items such as gainsincluding losses on sales of fixed assets, deferred income taxes, and restructuring charges of $3,092, offset by net changes in assets and gains on foreign currency hedges totaling $8,225.liabilities of $6,968 and pension and other post-retirement plan income of $417.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the first three months of 2017 was $3,805, driven almost entirely by capital expenditures.

3125
 

Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2016 was $68,309, which includes a payment for a business acquisition of $73,063, net of cash acquired, proceeds from the sale of assets of $12,237 and $7,483 for capital expenditures.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the first sixthree months of 20162017 was $18,184.$2,024. These cash inflows were the result of net borrowings under our credit facility totaling $20,100, windfall tax benefits from$4,900 offset by taxes paid on behalf of employees for equity awards in the amount of $696 offset by$1,566 and dividend payments of $2,612.$1,310.
Capital Resources
Long‑term debt was comprised of the following:
 As of
 March 31, December 31,
 2017 2016
Revolving credit facility due in 2020$94,000
 $89,100
Weighted average interest rate2.0% 1.5%
Amount available$203,835
 $208,735
Total credit facility$300,000
 $300,000
Standby letters of credit$2,165
 $2,165
Commitment fee percentage per annum0.25% 0.25%
On August 10, 2015, CTSwe entered into a new five-year credit agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of banks (“Revolving Credit Facility”) in order to support CTS’ working capital needs and other general corporate purposes.our financing needs.  The Revolving Credit Facility originally provided for a credit line of $200,000. This Revolving Credit Facility replaced a prior unsecured credit facility.  Borrowings under the previous credit agreement were refinanced under the Revolving Credit Facility and the previous credit agreement was terminated on August 10, 2015. On May 23, 2016, CTSwe requested and received a $100,000 increase in the aggregate revolving credit commitments under its existing credit agreement, which increased the credit line from $200,000 to $300,000. 
Long‑term debt was comprised of the following:
 As of
 June 30, December 31,
 2016 2015
Revolving credit facility due in 2020$110,800
 $90,700
Weighted average interest rate1.9% 1.5%
Amount available$187,035
 $106,985
Total credit facility$300,000
 $200,000
Standby letters of credit$2,165
 $2,315
Commitment fee percentage per annum0.30% 0.25%
The Revolving Credit Facility requires, among other things, that CTS comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility.  CTS wasWe were in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. 
CTS usesWe use interest rate swaps to convert the Revolving Credit Facility’s variable rate of interest into a fixed rate. In the second quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separateadditional interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $25,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2016, we entered into three additional forward-starting interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods August 2017 to August 2020. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the swap agreements iswill be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense when settled.
Generally, CTS'our practice and intention is to reinvest the earnings of itsour non-U.S. subsidiaries outside the U.S. However, CTSwe determined during 2015 that as a result of changes in the business, the foreign earnings of itsour subsidiaries in Canada and the U.K. were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded at that time. Any repatriation may not result in significant cash income tax payments as the taxable event would likely be offset by the utilization of the then available tax credits, resulting in no significant net cash taxes being incurred. CTS doesWe do not provide for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested.
We have historically funded our capital and operating needs primarily through cash flows from operating activities, supported by available credit under our Revolving Credit Facility. We believe that cash flows from operating activities and available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility will be adequate to fund our working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, we may choose to pursue additional equity and debt financing to provide additional liquidity or to fund acquisitions.



32

Table of Contents


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management prepared the consolidated financial statements of CTS under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments, and assumptions we used are reasonable, based upon the information available.
Our estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts in our financial statements. The following accounting policies comprise those that we believe are the most critical in understanding and evaluating CTS'our reported financial results.

26

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition
Product revenue is recognized once four criteria are met: (1) we have persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer, which generally happens at the point of shipment, provided that no significant obligations remain; (3) the price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Product Warranties
Provisions for estimated warranty expenses related to our automotive products are made at the time products are sold. These estimates are established using a quoted industry rate. We adjust our warranty reserve for any known or anticipated warranty claims as new information becomes available. We evaluate our warranty obligations at least quarterly and adjust our accruals if it is probable that future costs will be different than our current reserve.
Accounts Receivable
We have standardized credit granting and review policies and procedures for all customer accounts, including:
Credit reviews of all new customer accounts,
Ongoing credit evaluations of current customers,
Credit limits and payment terms based on available credit information,
Adjustments to credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current credit worthiness,
An active collection effort by regional credit functions, reporting directly to the corporate financial officers, andand;
Limited credit insurance on the majority of our international receivables.
We reserve for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues. Over the last three years, accounts receivable reserves have been approximately 0.2% to 0.3% of total accounts receivable. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering the quality of the portfolio. While credit losses have historically been within expectations and the reserves established, we cannot guarantee that our credit loss experience will continue to be consistent with historical experience.
Inventories
We value our inventories at the lower of the actual cost to purchase or manufacture using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method, or the current estimated marketnet realizable value. We review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on forecasts of product demand and production requirements.
Over the last three years, our reserves for excess and obsolete inventories have ranged from 18.0%18.4% to 20.1%19.5% of gross inventory. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering the quantities and quality of the inventories.
Retirement Plans
Actuarial assumptions are used in determining pension income and expense and our pension benefit obligation. We utilize actuaries from consulting companies in each applicable country to develop our discount rates that match high-quality bonds currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefit in order to provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the accumulated benefits when due. After considering the recommendations of our actuaries, we have assumed a discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets and a rate of compensation increase in determining our annual pension income and expense and the projected benefit obligation. During the fourth quarter of each year, we review our actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted. Changes in the actuarial assumptions could have a material effect on our results of operations.
Valuation of Goodwill
Goodwill of a reporting unit is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently, if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or circumstances include:include, but are not limited to, the following:
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value,
Significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate,
Adverse action or assessment by a regulator,
Unanticipated competition,

3327
 

Table of Contents

Unanticipated competition,
More-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of,
Testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, and
Allocation of a portion of goodwill to a business to be disposed.
If CTS believeswe believe that one or more of the above indicators of impairment have occurred, we perform an impairment test. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using two valuation methods: "Income Approach — Discounted Cash Flow Method" and "Market Approach — Guideline Public Company Method". The approach defined below is based upon our last impairment test conducted as of October 1, 2015.2016.
Under the "Income Approach — Discounted Cash Flow Method", the key assumptions considerinclude sales, cost of sales, and operating expenses projectedexpense projections through the year 2020.2021. These assumptions were determined by management utilizing our internal operating plan and assuming growth rates for revenues, operating expenses, and gross margin assumptions. The fourth key assumption under this approach is the discount rate, which is determined by looking at current risk-free rates, current market interest rates and the evaluation of risk premium relevant to the business segment. If any of our assumptions relative to growth rates were to change or were incorrect, our fair value calculation may change, which could result in impairment.
Under the "Market Approach — Guideline Public Company Method", we identified eight publicly traded companies including CTS, which we believe have significant relevant similarities.similarities to CTS. For these eight companies, we calculated a range of EBITDA multiples derived from the mean ratio of invested capitalenterprise value to revenuesEBITDA and invested capitalcompared these multiples to EBITDA.the corresponding multiples for each of our reporting units. Similar to the Incomeincome approach discussed above, sales, cost of sales, operating expenses and their respective growth rates were the key assumptions utilized.utilized in developing projected EBITDA levels for each of our reporting units. The market prices of CTS and the other guideline companycompany's shares are also key assumptions. If these market prices increase, the estimated market value would increase. If the market prices decrease, the estimated market value would decrease.assumptions as they are used to calculate enterprise value.
The results of these two methods are weighted based upon management's determination. The Market approach is based upon historical and current economic conditions, which might not reflect the long-term prospects or opportunities for CTS' businessour reporting units being evaluated.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss, whichif any. This involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill.
There have not been any significant changes to our impairment testing methodology other than updates to the assumptions to reflect the current market environment. As discussed above, key assumptions used in the first step of the goodwill impairment test were determined by management utilizing CTS' internal operating plan. The key assumptions utilized include forecasted growth rates for revenues and operating expenses as well as a discount rate which is determined by looking at current risk-free rates of capital, current market interest rates and the evaluation of a risk premium relevant to the business segment. CTS will monitor future results and will perform a test if indicators trigger an impairment review.
We test the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Based upon our latest assessment, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired as of October 1, 2015,2016. We will monitor future results and there have been no furtherwill perform a test if indicators of goodwilltrigger an impairment since that time.review.
Valuation of Long-LivedOther Intangible and Other IntangibleLong-Lived Assets
We evaluate the impairment of identifiable intangibles and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered that may trigger an impairment review consist of:of, but are not limited to, the following:
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value,
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results,
Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business,
Significant negative industry or economic trends,trends.
If we believe that one or more indicators of impairment have occurred, we perform a recoverability test by comparing the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value. No indicators of impairment were identified as of March 31, 2017.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best estimate of current and future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant declinejudgments and estimates are required in CTS' stock price for a sustained period, and
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value.the determination of the consolidated income tax expense.

3428
 

Table of Contents

If CTS believes that one or moreDeferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of the above indicators of impairment have occurredassets and the undiscounted cash flow test failedliabilities and their reported amounts in the case of amortizable assets, it measures impairment based on projected discounted cash flows using a discount rate that incorporates the risk inherentfinancial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the cash flows.
Income Taxes
CTS identified, evaluated, and measured the amount of income tax benefitsfuture. In evaluating our ability to be recognized for all ofrecover our income tax positions. Included in deferred tax assets in the jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. The assumptions about future taxable income require the use of significant judgment and are amountsconsistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. ASC 740 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of its technical merits.  We record unrecognized tax benefits as liabilities in accordance with ASC 740 and adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to federal, state and foreign net operating losses. CTS intends to utilize these net operating loss carryforwards to offset future income taxes.tax expense in the period in which new information is available.
CTS'Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of income tax expense.
CTS earnsWe earn a significant amount of itsour operating income outside of the U.S., which is generally deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. However, CTSwe determined during 2015 that as a result of changes in the business, the foreign earnings of itsour subsidiaries in Canada and the U.K. were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded. CTS doesWe do not intend to repatriate funds beyond the amount from itsour Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries; however, should CTSwe require more capital in the U.S. than is generated by our domestic operations, CTSwe could elect to repatriate funds held in foreign jurisdictions or raise capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances. Repatriation would result in a higher effective tax rate. Borrowing in the U.S. would result in increased interest expense.
Significant Customers
Our net sales to customers representing at least 10% of total net sales were as follows:
Three months ended
Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
June 30,
June 28,
June 30,
June 28,March 31,
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016
Cummins Inc.12.9%
10.4%
Toyota Motor Corporation10.8% 10.7%
Honda Motor Co.10.3%
10.3%
11.0%
9.9%9.8% 11.7%
Toyota Motor Corporation10.8% 10.0% 10.7%
9.2%
Cummins Inc.9.6% 8.7% 10.0%
8.5%

Forward‑Looking Statements
This document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward‑looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward‑looking statements include, but are not limited to, any financial or other guidance, statements that reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events, and any other statements that are not based solely on historical fact. Forward‑looking statements are based on management’s expectations, certain assumptions and currently available information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward‑looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof and are based on various assumptions as to future events, the occurrence of which necessarily are subject to uncertainties. These forward‑looking statements are made subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those presented in the forward‑looking statements. Examples of factors that may affect future operating results and financial condition include, but are not limited to: changes in the economy generally and in respect to the business in which CTS operates; unanticipated issues in integrating acquisitions; the results of actions to reposition our business; rapid technological change; general market conditions in the automotive, communications, and computer industries, as well as conditions in the industrial, defense and aerospace, and medical markets; reliance on key customers; unanticipated natural disasters or other events; the ability to protect our intellectual property; pricing pressures and demand for our products; unanticipated developments that could occur with respect to contingencies such as litigation and environmental matters as well as any product liability claims; and risks associated with our international operations, including trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political and geopolitical risks. Many of these and other risks and uncertainties are discussed in further detail in Item 1A. of CTS' Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2016. We undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward‑looking statements to reflect new information or events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof, including market or industry changes.

3529
 

Table of Contents

Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in our market risk since December 31, 2015.2016.
 
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, management, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable

Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are involved in litigation with respect to matters arising from the ordinary conduct of our business, and currently certain claims are pending against us. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information, either adequate provision for anticipated costs have been accrued or the ultimate anticipated costs will not materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no significant changes to our risk factors since December 31, 2015.2016.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On April 27, 2015, CTSwe announced that itsour Board of Directors authorized an expansion to its repurchase program by authorizing the purchase of an additional $25 million dollars of its common stock in the open market.   This authorization has no expiration. As shown in the following table, there were no stock repurchases during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.
     (c)  
     Total Number (d)
 (a)   of Shares Maximum Dollar Value
 Total Number of (b) Purchased as of Shares That May Yet Be
 Shares Average Price Part of Plans or Purchased Under the
 Purchased Paid per Share Program 
Plans or Programs(2)


 
 
 

Balance at March 31, 2016      $17,554
April 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016
 
 
 $
Total
 
 
 $17,554
     (c)  
     Total Number (d)
 (a)   of Shares Maximum Dollar Value
 Total Number of (b) Purchased as of Shares That May Yet Be
 Shares Average Price Part of Plans or Purchased Under the
 Purchased Paid per Share Program 
Plans or Programs(2)


 
 
 

Balance at December 31, 2016      $17,554
January 1, 2017 - March 31, 2017
 
 
 $
Total
 
 
 $17,554

3630
 

Table of Contents

Item 6.  Exhibits 
(31)(a)Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
  
(31)(b)Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
  
(32)(a)Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
  
(32)(b)Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
  
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
  
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
  
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
  
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
  
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CTS Corporation CTS Corporation
   
/s/ Luis F. Machado /s/ Ashish Agrawal
Luis F. Machado
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
 
Ashish Agrawal
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
Dated: July 29, 2016April 27, 2017 Dated: July 29, 2016April 27, 2017

3731