UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

_________________

(Mark One)

☒Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

☐Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-6028

_________________

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________



Indiana	35-1140070
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

150 N. Radnor Chester Road, Suite A305, Radnor, Pennsylvania	19087
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(484) 583-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

~~_________________~~

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	LNC	New York Stock Exchange
Warrants, each to purchase one share of common stock	LNC.WS	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~

Large accelerated filer ☒Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~

Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐No ☒

As of ~~July 30, 2018,~~April 29, 2019, there were ~~216,680,606~~202,343,277 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Lincoln National Corporation

Table of Contents


Item			Page			Page
PART I	PART I			PART I
1.	Financial Statements		1	Financial Statements		1

2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		48	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		46
		Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language	48		Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language	46
		Introduction	49		Introduction	47
		Executive Summary	49		Executive Summary	47
		Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	50		Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	48
		Results of Consolidated Operations	52		Results of Consolidated Operations	49
		Results of Annuities	54		Results of Annuities	51
		Results of Retirement Plan Services	60		Results of Retirement Plan Services	56
		Results of Life Insurance	64		Results of Life Insurance	60
		Results of Group Protection	69		Results of Group Protection	64
		Results of Other Operations	72		Results of Other Operations	67
		Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking	74		Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking	69
		Consolidated Investments	76		Consolidated Investments	71
		Review of Consolidated Financial Condition	88		Review of Consolidated Financial Condition	83
		Liquidity and Capital Resources	88		Liquidity and Capital Resources	83

3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		92	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		87

4.	Controls and Procedures		92	Controls and Procedures		87

PART II	PART II			PART II

1.	Legal Proceedings		93	Legal Proceedings		88

1A.	Risk Factors		93	Risk Factors		88

2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		94	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		88

6.	Exhibits		94	Exhibits		88

	Exhibit Index for the Report on Form 10-Q		95	Exhibit Index for the Report on Form 10-Q		89

	Signatures		96	Signatures		90

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share data)


		As of			As of			As of			As of
	June 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
		2018			2017			2019			2018
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Investments:
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value:
Fixed maturity securities (amortized cost: 2018 – $90,083; 2017 – $86,993)		$	93,060		$	94,840
Equity securities (cost: 2017 – $247)			-			246
Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2019 – $92,894; 2018 – $92,429)								$	98,050		$	94,024
Trading securities			1,450			1,620			3,314			1,950
Equity securities			112			-			153			99
Mortgage loans on real estate			12,217			10,762			13,997			13,260
Real estate			11			11
Policy loans			2,508			2,399			2,498			2,509
Derivative investments			584			915			981			1,107
Other investments			2,065			2,296			2,752			2,267
Total investments			112,007			113,089			121,745			115,216
Cash and invested cash			1,775			1,628			1,593			2,345
Deferred acquisition costs and value of business acquired			9,904			8,403			9,441			10,264
Premiums and fees receivable			574			396			607			570
Accrued investment income			1,119			1,078			1,184			1,119
Reinsurance recoverables			17,979			4,907			17,660			17,748
Funds withheld reinsurance assets			572			593			549			557
Goodwill			1,750			1,368			1,778			1,782
Other assets			8,921			6,082			16,373			15,713
Separate account assets			144,231			144,219			143,369			132,833
Total assets		$	298,832		$	281,763		$	314,299		$	298,147

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Future contract benefits		$	33,718		$	22,887		$	34,009		$	34,648
Other contract holder funds			88,698			80,209			93,959			91,233
Short-term debt			-			450			300			-
Long-term debt			5,826			4,894			5,572			5,839
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives			25			57			177			3
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities			1,711			1,761			1,762			1,740
Deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance			1			1
Payables for collateral on investments			4,699			4,417			5,362			4,805
Other liabilities			4,746			5,546			13,372			12,696
Separate account liabilities			144,231			144,219			143,369			132,833
Total liabilities			283,655			264,441			297,882			283,797

Contingencies and Commitments (See Note 10)
Contingencies and Commitments (See Note 11)

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock – 10,000,000 shares authorized			-			-			-			-
Common stock – 800,000,000 shares authorized; 217,294,051 and 218,090,114 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively			5,674			5,693
Common stock – 800,000,000 shares authorized; 202,987,229 and 205,862,760 shares
issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively									5,285			5,392
Retained earnings			8,302			8,399			8,679			8,551
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			1,201			3,230			2,453			407
Total stockholders’ equity			15,177			17,322			16,417			14,350
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	298,832		$	281,763		$	314,299		$	298,147

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Revenues
Insurance premiums	$	1,165		$	801		$	1,943		$	1,608		$	1,446		$	777
Fee income		1,470			1,393			2,926			2,747			1,475			1,456
Net investment income		1,232			1,262			2,465			2,499			1,251			1,233
Realized gain (loss):
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities		(1	)		(4	)		(3	)		(8	)		(23	)		(2	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income		-			-			-			-			15			-
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities
recognized in earnings		(1	)		(4	)		(3	)		(8	)
Realized gain (loss), excluding other-than-temporary
impairment losses on securities		(6	)		(6	)		8			(41	)
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings														(8	)		(2	)
Realized gain (loss), excluding other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities														(354	)		14
Total realized gain (loss)		(7	)		(10	)		5			(49	)		(362	)		12
Amortization of deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance		-			4			-			22			8			-
Other revenues		160			127			290			250			147			131
Total revenues		4,020			3,577			7,629			7,077			3,965			3,609
Expenses
Interest credited		647			646			1,300			1,293			678			653
Benefits		1,661			1,287			3,019			2,578			1,757			1,358
Commissions and other expenses		1,177			1,034			2,234			2,048			1,176			1,057
Interest and debt expense		68			63			159			127			71			91
Strategic digitization expense		16			14			31			23			15			15
Total expenses		3,569			3,044			6,743			6,069			3,697			3,174
Income (loss) before taxes		451			533			886			1,008			268			435
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		66			122			134			162			16			68
Net income (loss)		385			411			752			846			252			367
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(1,032	)		864			(2,671	)		1,145			2,046			(1,639	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(647	)	$	1,275		$	(1,919	)	$	1,991		$	2,298		$	(1,272	)

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic	$	1.76		$	1.84		$	3.45		$	3.77		$	1.23		$	1.68
Diluted		1.70			1.81			3.34			3.70			1.22			1.64

Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	0.33		$	0.29		$	0.66		$	0.58		$	0.37		$	0.33

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)



	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018

Common Stock
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	5,693		$	5,869		$	5,392		$	5,693
Stock compensation/issued for benefit plans		19			58			(5	)		7
Retirement of common stock/cancellation of shares		(38	)		(153	)		(102	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period		5,674			5,774			5,285			5,700

Retained Earnings
Balance as of beginning-of-year		8,399			7,043			8,551			8,399
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards		(642	)		-			-			(642	)
Net income (loss)		752			846			252			367
Retirement of common stock		(62	)		(247	)		(48	)		-
Common stock dividends declared		(145	)		(131	)		(76	)		(72	)
Balance as of end-of-period		8,302			7,511			8,679			8,052

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance as of beginning-of-year		3,230			1,566			407			3,230
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards		642			-			-			642
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(2,671	)		1,145			2,046			(1,639	)
Balance as of end-of-period		1,201			2,711			2,453			2,233
Total stockholders’ equity as of end-of-period	$	15,177		$	15,996		$	16,417		$	15,985

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, in millions)


	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	752		$	846		$	252		$	367
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired, deferred sales inducements
and deferred front-end loads deferrals and interest, net of amortization		(3	)		30			(70	)		6
Trading securities purchases, sales and maturities, net		133			60			(1,209	)		39
Change in premiums and fees receivable		(91	)		65			(37	)		(84	)
Change in accrued investment income		(17	)		(20	)		(65	)		(59	)
Change in future contract benefits and other contract holder funds		(848	)		(864	)		(348	)		(104	)
Change in reinsurance related assets and liabilities		664			(92	)		(299	)		(113	)
Change in accrued expenses		(90	)		(96	)		(56	)		(41	)
Change in federal income tax accruals		44			162			16			68
Realized (gain) loss		(5	)		49			362			(12	)
Amortization of deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance		-			(22	)		(8	)		-
Other		93			84			131			73
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		632			202			(1,331	)		140

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchases of available-for-sale securities and equity securities		(4,836	)		(5,513	)		(4,404	)		(2,020	)
Sales of available-for-sale securities and equity securities		870			842			2,381			427
Maturities of available-for-sale securities		3,351			2,840			1,456			1,368
Purchase of common stock in acquisition, net of cash acquired		(1,404	)		-
Sale of business, net		(12	)		-
Purchases of alternative investments		(146	)		(124	)		(174	)		(63	)
Sales and repayments of alternative investments		69			100			32			31
Issuance of mortgage loans on real estate		(1,310	)		(705	)		(1,103	)		(546	)
Repayment and maturities of mortgage loans on real estate		513			571			242			261
Issuance and repayment of policy loans, net		23			34			11			11
Net change in collateral on investments, derivatives and related settlements		588			(12	)		488			(32	)
Other		(79	)		(37	)		(62	)		(32	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(2,373	)		(2,004	)		(1,133	)		(595	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Payment of long-term debt, including current maturities		(537	)		-			-			(487	)
Issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs		1,094			-			-			1,094
Payment related to early extinguishment of debt		(23	)		-			-			(23	)
Proceeds from sales leaseback transaction		51			45
Deposits of fixed account values, including the fixed portion of variable		5,916			5,216			4,042			2,765
Withdrawals of fixed account values, including the fixed portion of variable		(3,007	)		(2,934	)		(1,570	)		(1,498	)
Transfers to and from separate accounts, net		(1,353	)		(770	)		(507	)		(686	)
Common stock issued for benefit plans		(8	)		33			(26	)		(9	)
Repurchase of common stock		(100	)		(400	)		(150	)		-
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(145	)		(132	)		(77	)		(72	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,888			1,058			1,712			1,084

Net increase (decrease) in cash, invested cash and restricted cash		147			(744	)		(752	)		629
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of beginning-of-year		1,628			2,722			2,345			1,628
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of end-of-period	$	1,775		$	1,978		$	1,593		$	2,257

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Nature of Operations

Lincoln National Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries (“LNC” or the “Company,” which also may be referred to as “we,” “our” or “us”) operate multiple insurance businesses through four business segments. See Note 1514 for additional details. The collective group of businesses uses “Lincoln Financial Group” as its marketing identity. Through our business segments, we sell a wide range of wealth protection, accumulation and retirement income products and solutions. These products primarily include fixed and indexed annuities, variable annuities, universal life insurance (“UL”), variable universal life insurance (“VUL”), linked-benefit UL, indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”), term life insurance, employer-sponsored retirement plans and services, and group life, disability and dental.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As discussed in Note 3, on May 1, 2018, LNC and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“LNL”) completed the acquisition of Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”). The information contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (“~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K”), should be read in connection with the reading of these interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Certain GAAP policies, which significantly affect the determination of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, are summarized in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, these statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s results. Operating results for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

2. New Accounting Standards

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

The following table provides a description of our adoption of new Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the impact of the adoption on our financial statements. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or ~~not material~~insignificant in presentation or amount.


Standard	Description	Date of Adoption	Effect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU ~~2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~2016-02, Leases and all related amendments	This standard establishes the core principle of recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services and defines a five-step process that systematically identifies the various components of the revenue recognition process, culminating with the recognition of revenue upon satisfaction of an entity’s performance obligation. Although the standard and all related amendments supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP, the guidance does not amend the accounting for insurance and investment contracts recognized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification™ ~~(“ASC”) Topic 944, Financial Services – Insurance, leases, financial instruments and guarantees.~~	~~January 1, 2018~~	We adopted the standard and all related amendments using the modified retrospective method. Our primary sources of revenue are recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 944, Financial Services – Insurance; as such, revenue within the scope of the new standard primarily includes commissions and advisory fees earned by our broker dealer operation. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, stockholders’ equity or cash flows. There were no material changes in the timing or measurement of revenues based upon the guidance. As a result, there is no cumulative effect on retained earnings. For more information, see Note 15.

~~Standard~~	~~Description~~	~~Date of Adoption~~	~~Effect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters~~
~~ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~	These amendments require, among other things, the fair value measurement of investments in equity securities and certain other ownership interests that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The change in fair value of the impacted investments in equity securities must be recognized in net income in the period of the change in fair value. In addition, the amendments include certain enhancements to the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance does not apply to Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock. Early adoption of the ASU is generally not permitted, except as defined in the ASU. The amendments were adopted in the financial statements through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.	~~January 1, 2018~~	At the time of adoption, we had equity securities classified as available-for-sale (“AFS”) with a total carrying value of $246 million. We classified, prospectively, $110 million of equity securities within the scope of this ASU in a separate line on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining securities, consisting of $136 million of FHLB stock, are classified in other investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and carried at cost. The cumulative-effect adjustment of adopting this ASU was $1 million.
~~ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income~~	These amendments require a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects associated with the change in the federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) of 2017. The amount of the reclassification is equal to the impact of the change in deferred taxes related to amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) resulting from the change in the statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Early adoption is permitted and retrospective application is required.	~~January 1, 2018~~	~~We retrospectively reclassified $641 million of stranded tax effects from AOCI to retained earnings in the period of adoption.~~

~~Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards~~

~~The following table provides a description of future adoptions of new accounting standards that may have an impact on our financial statements when adopted:~~


~~Standard~~	~~Description~~	~~Projected Date of Adoption~~	~~Effect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters~~
~~ASU 2016-02, Leases~~	This standard establishes a new accounting model for leases. Lessees will recognize most leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a related lease liability. The lease liability is measured as the present value of the lease payments over the lease term with the ~~right-of-use~~ROU asset measured at the lease liability amount and including adjustments for certain lease incentives and initial direct costs. Lease expense recognition will continue to differentiate between finance leases and operating leases resulting in a similar pattern of lease expense recognition as under current GAAP. This ASU permits a modified retrospective adoption approach that includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect upon adoption. Early adoption is permitted.	January 1, 2019	We adopted this standard and all related amendments, which resulted in the recognition of $207 million in ROU assets and $214 million in operating lease liabilities reported in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 1, 2019. Comparative periods continue to ~~gather information~~be measured and presented under historical guidance, and only the period of adoption is subject to ~~determine our leases that are within~~this ASU. Also, on transition, we have elected not to reassess: 1) whether expired or existing contracts contain a lease under the ~~scope~~new definition of a lease; 2) lease classification for expired or existing leases; and 3) whether previously capitalized initial direct costs would qualify for capitalization under this ~~standard. We do~~ASU. Additionally, there is not ~~expect there to be~~ a significant difference in our pattern of lease expense recognition under this ~~ASU.~~
ASU, ~~2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses~~and there is no impact on ~~Financial Instruments~~	These amendments adopt a new model to measure and recognize credit losses for most financial assets. The method used to measure estimated credit losses for AFS debt securities will be unchanged from current GAAP; however, the amendments require credit losses to be recognized through an allowance rather than as a reduction to the amortized cost of those debt securities. The amendments will permit entities to recognize improvements in credit loss estimates on AFS debt securities by reducing the allowance account immediately through earnings. The amendments will be adopted through a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings as of the first reporting period in which the amendments are effective. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein.	~~January 1, 2020~~	We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations, with a primary focus on our fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans and reinsurance recoverables.cash flows. For more information, see Note 11.
ASU 2017-08, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities	These amendments require an entity to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium so that the premium is amortized to the earliest call date. Early adoption is permitted, and the ASU requires adoption under a modified retrospective basis through a ~~cumulative-effect~~cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings.	January 1, 2019	We ~~are currently evaluating~~adopted the ~~impact~~provisions of ~~adopting~~ this ASU, which did not result in a change to our existing practices; therefore, no cumulative effect adjustment was recorded. As such, there was no impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities	These amendments change both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. These amendments retain the threshold of highly effective for hedging relationships, remove the requirement to bifurcate between the portions of the hedging relationship that are effective and ineffective, record hedge item and hedging instrument results in the same financial statement line item, require quantitative assessment initially for all hedging relationships unless the hedging relationship meets the definition of either the shortcut method or critical terms match method and allow the contractual specified index rate to be designated as the hedged risk in a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk of a variable rate financial instrument. These amendments also eliminate the benchmark interest rate concept for variable rate instruments. Early adoption is permitted.	January 1, 2019	We adopted the provisions of this ASU, which did not have an impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This ASU does result in our modification of certain hedge documentation and effectiveness methods, which we have reflected in applicable disclosures in Note 6.

Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards

The following table provides a description of future adoptions of new accounting standards that may have an impact on our financial statements when adopted:


Standard	Description	Projected Date of Adoption	Effect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments	These amendments adopt a new model to measure and recognize credit losses for most financial assets. The method used to measure estimated credit losses for available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities will be unchanged from current GAAP; however, the amendments require credit losses to be recognized through an allowance rather than as a reduction to the amortized cost of those debt securities. The amendments will permit entities to recognize improvements in credit loss estimates on AFS debt securities by reducing the allowance account immediately through earnings. The amendments will be adopted through a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings as of the first reporting period in which the amendments are effective. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein.	January 1, 2020	We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations, with a primary focus on our fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans and reinsurance recoverables.
ASU 2018-12, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts	These amendments make changes to the accounting and reporting for long-duration contracts issued by an insurance entity that will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts, including how they measure, recognize and make disclosures about insurance liabilities and deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”). Under this ASU, insurers will be required to review cash flow assumptions at least annually and update them if necessary. They also will have to make quarterly updates to the discount rate assumptions they use to measure the liability for future policyholder benefits. The ASU creates a new category of market risk benefits (i.e., features that protect the contract holder from capital market risk and expose the insurer to that risk) that insurers will have to measure at fair value. The ASU provides various transition methods by topic that entities may elect upon adoption. Early adoption is permitted.	January 1, 2021	We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

3. Acquisition

~~As previously announced, on~~On May 1, 2018, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Liberty Life, which operates a group benefits business (“Liberty Group Business”) and individual life and individual and group annuity business (the “Liberty Life Business”), from Liberty Mutual Insurance Company in a transaction accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting pursuant to Business Combinations Topic 805 (“Topic 805”). The acquisition ~~enables us to increase our market share within~~expanded the ~~group protection marketplace.~~scale and capabilities of the Group Protection business while further diversifying the Company’s sources of earnings.

In connection with the acquisition and pursuant to the Master Transaction Agreement (“MTA”), dated January 18, 2018, which was attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2018, Liberty Life sold the Liberty Life Business on May 1, 2018, by entering into reinsurance agreements and related ancillary documents (including administrative services agreements and transition services agreements) with Protective Life Insurance Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (together with Protective Life Insurance Company, “Protective”), providing for the reinsurance and administration of the Liberty Life Business.

Liberty Life’s excess capital of $1.8 billion was paid to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company through an extraordinary dividend at the acquisition date. We paid $1.5 billion of cash to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company to acquire the Liberty Group Business.

We recognized $44 million and $50 million of acquisition-related costs, pre-tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. These costs are included in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The acquisition date fair values of certain assets and liabilities, including future contract benefits, intangible assets and related weighted average expected lives, commercial mortgage loans, reinsurance recoverables and deferred income taxes, are provisional and subject to

revision within one year of the acquisition date. Since the May 1, 2018 acquisition date, we have adjusted provisional assets acquired by $(5) million and provisional liabilities acquired by $23 million for an increase in provisional goodwill of $28 million. Under the terms of the MTA, a final balance sheet will be agreed upon ~~during the third quarter of 2018.~~at a later date. As such, our estimates of fair values are pending finalization, which may result in adjustments to goodwill. The following table presents the preliminary fair values (in millions) of the net assets acquired related to the Liberty Group Business as of ~~the acquisition date:~~March 31, 2019:



	Preliminary
	Fair Value
Assets
Investments	$	2,493
Mortgage loans on real estate		658
Cash and invested cash		~~113~~107
Reinsurance recoverables		76
Premiums and fees receivable		83
Accrued investment income		24
Other intangible assets acquired		640
Other assets acquired		~~141~~142
Separate account assets		99
Total assets acquired	$	~~4,327~~4,322

Liabilities
Future contract benefits	$	2,930
Other contract holder funds		4346
Other liabilities acquired		~~120~~140
Separate account liabilities		99
Total liabilities assumed	$	~~3,192~~3,215

Net identifiable assets acquired	$	~~1,135~~1,107
Goodwill		~~382~~410
Net assets acquired	$	1,517

~~Identifiable Intangible Assets~~

~~The following table presents the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired (dollars in millions):~~

Weighted-

Average

Amortization

Fair Value

Period

Value of customer relationships acquired
$
576

20

Value of distribution agreements

31

13

Value of business acquired

30

3

Insurance licenses

3

N/A

Total identifiable intangible assets
$
640

The value of customer relationships acquired (“VOCRA”) and value of distribution agreements (“VODA”), included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, reflects the estimated fair value of the customer relationships acquired and distribution agreements of the Liberty Group Business as of May 1, 2018. The value of the identifiable intangible assets was estimated using a discounted cash flow method. Significant inputs to the valuation models include estimates of expected premiums, persistency rates, investment returns, claim costs, expenses and discount rates based on a weighted average cost of capital. Similar to other specifically identifiable intangible assets, the carrying values of VOCRA and VODA will be amortized using a straight-line method and reviewed at least annually for indicators of impairment in value that are other-than-temporary.

~~For information on value of business acquired (“VOBA”), see Notes 1 and 8 in our 2017 Form 10-K.~~

The value of insurance licenses was estimated using the comparable transaction method under the market approach based on arms-length transactions in which certificate authority companies with life and health insurance licenses were purchased. The value of insurance licenses has an indefinite useful life.

~~Goodwill~~

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the future economic benefits arising from assets acquired and liabilities assumed that could not be individually identified. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition includes the expected synergies and other benefits that management believes will result from the acquisition, including an increase in distribution strength. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition was allocated to the Group Protection segment. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.~~For more information on goodwill, see Notes 1 and 10 in our 2017 Form 10-K.~~

~~Future Contract Benefits~~

Unpaid claims acquired reflected within future contract benefits were recorded at estimated fair value. The reserve discount rate was based on the investment yield of the assets acquired with adjustments for risk margin. The actuarial classifications and methodologies were adjusted to be consistent with our accounting policies and reserve methodologies.

Financial Information

Since the acquisition date of May 1, 2018, the revenues and net income of the business acquired have been included in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the Group Protection segment and were $373 million and $12 million, respectively.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations of the Company assume that the acquisition of Liberty Life was completed on January 1, 2017 (in millions):

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Revenue
$
4,217

$
4,058

$
8,382

$
8,041

Net income

422

379

800

806



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
		2018
Revenue		$	4,165
Net income			378

Pro forma adjustments include the revenue and net income of the acquired business for each period as well as amortization of identifiable intangible assets acquired and the fair value adjustment to acquired insurance reserves and investments. Other pro forma adjustments include the incremental increase to interest expense attributable to financing the ~~acquisition;~~acquisition, and the impact of reflecting acquisition and integration costs and investment expenses directly attributable to the business combination in 2017 instead of in 2018. Pro forma

adjustments do not include retrospective adjustments to defer and amortize acquisition costs as would be recorded under our accounting policy.

~~Reinsurance~~

Pursuant to the reinsurance agreements, we sold the Liberty Life Business to Protective for a ceding commission of $423 million. Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers increased significantly to $18.0 billion as of June 30, 2018, from $4.9 billion as of December 31, 2017, primarily as a result of this reinsurance transaction. As such, Protective now represents our largest reinsurance exposure. As we are not relieved of our liability, the liabilities and obligations associated with the reinsured policies remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding reinsurance recoverable from Protective. To support its obligations under the reinsurance agreements, Protective has established trust accounts for our benefit that fully collateralize the related reinsurance recoverable. We recorded a deferred tax asset attributed to a tax loss carryforward arising from the reinsurance transaction with Protective.

4. Variable Interest Entities

Consolidated VIEs

~~See Note 4 in our 2017 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of our consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which information is incorporated herein by reference.~~

Asset information (dollars in millions) for the consolidated ~~VIEs~~variable interest entities (“VIEs”) included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets was as follows:



		As of June 30, 2018							As of December 31, 2017							As of March 31, 2019							As of December 31, 2018
		Number							Number							Number							Number
		of		Notional		Carrying			of		Notional		Carrying			of		Notional		Carrying			of		Notional		Carrying
	Instruments			Amounts		Value		Instruments			Amounts		Value		Instruments			Amounts		Value		Instruments			Amounts		Value
Assets
Fixed maturity securities:
Total return swap			1		574		-			1		573		-			1	$	587	$	-			1	$	600	$	-
Total assets			1	$	574	$	-			1	$	573	$	-			1	$	587	$	-			1	$	600	$	-

As of ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, there were no gains or losses for consolidated VIEs recognized on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Unconsolidated VIEs

~~See Note 4~~Structured Securities

Through our investment activities, we make passive investments in structured securities issued by VIEs for which we are not the manager. These structured securities include our ~~2017 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion~~asset-backed securities (“ABS”), residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). We have not provided financial or other support with respect to these VIEs other than our original investment. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs due to the relative size of our ~~unconsolidated~~investment in comparison to the principal amount of the structured securities issued by the VIEs ~~which~~and the level of credit subordination that reduces our obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits. Our maximum exposure to loss on these structured securities is limited to the amortized cost for these investments. We recognize our variable interest in these VIEs at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For information ~~is incorporated herein by reference.~~about these structured securities, see Note 5.

Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies

We invest in certain limited partnerships (“LPs”) and limited liability companies (“LLCs”), including qualified affordable housing projects, that we have concluded are VIEs. We do not hold any substantive kick-out or participation rights in the LPs and LLCs, and we do not receive any performance fees or decision maker fees from the LPs and LLCs. Based on our analysis of the LPs and LLCs, we are not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs as we do not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the LPs and LLCs.

The carrying amounts of our investments in the LPs and LLCs are recognized in other investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and were ~~$1.6~~$1.8 billion and ~~$1.5~~$1.7 billion as of ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Included in these carrying amounts are our investments in qualified affordable housing projects, which were ~~$26~~$18 million and ~~$31~~$20 million as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. We do not have any contingent commitments to provide additional capital funding to these qualified affordable housing projects. We received returns from these qualified affordable housing projects in the form of income tax credits and other tax benefits ~~that were~~of less than $1 ~~million and $2~~ million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively,~~ which were recognized in federal income tax expense (benefit) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Our exposure to loss is limited to the capital we invest in the LPs and LLCs, and there have been no indicators of impairment that would require us to recognize an impairment loss related to the LPs and LLCs as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~

March 31, 2019.

119

5. Investments

Fixed Maturity AFS Securities

See Note 1 in our 2017 Form 10-K for information regarding our accounting policy relating to AFS securities, which also includes additional disclosures regarding our fair value measurements. In addition, we adopted ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, in 2018 that resulted in a new classification and measurement of our equity securities. See Note 2 for additional information.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, losses and other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions) were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018											As of March 31, 2019
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized							Fair		Amortized		Gross Unrealized							Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		OTTI (1)			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		OTTI (1)			Value
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	78,009	$	3,605	$	1,582	$	(9	)	$	80,041	$	79,243	$	4,813	$	838	$	10		$	83,208
Asset-backed securities ("ABS")		964		44		7		(17	)		1,018
ABS													990		46		6		(17	)		1,047
U.S. government bonds		396		29		3		-			422		387		37		1		-			423
Foreign government bonds		430		41		-		-			471		403		50		-		-			453
Residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS")		3,317		119		84		(22	)		3,374
Commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS")		759		5		20		(3	)		747
Collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs")		1,121		-		7		(5	)		1,119
RMBS													3,296		142		42		(18	)		3,414
CMBS													868		16		3		(4	)		885
CLOs													2,439		4		11		(5	)		2,437
State and municipal bonds		4,509		753		14		-			5,248		4,687		890		8		-			5,569
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities		578		65		23		-			620		581		57		24		-			614
Total AFS securities	$	90,083	$	4,661	$	1,740	$	(56	)	$	93,060
Total fixed maturity AFS securities												$	92,894	$	6,055	$	933	$	(34	)	$	98,050



	As of December 31, 2017											As of December 31, 2018
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized							Fair		Amortized		Gross Unrealized							Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		OTTI (1)			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		OTTI (1)			Value
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	75,701	$	6,862	$	354	$	(7	)	$	82,216	$	79,623	$	2,980	$	2,263	$	(8	)	$	80,348
ABS		903		51		7		(27	)		974		916		42		6		(14	)		966
U.S. government bonds		527		41		1		-			567		390		29		2		-			417
Foreign government bonds		395		56		-		-			451		406		42		-		-			448
RMBS		3,327		155		39		(22	)		3,465		3,308		118		67		(14	)		3,373
CMBS		590		10		2		(2	)		600		811		6		16		(3	)		804
CLOs		803		2		2		(5	)		808		1,746		3		24		(5	)		1,730
State and municipal bonds		4,172		953		6		-			5,119		4,647		716		18		-			5,345
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities		575		87		22		-			640		582		45		34		-			593
Total fixed maturity securities		86,993		8,217		433		(63	)		94,840
Equity AFS securities		247		16		17		-			246
Total AFS securities	$	87,240	$	8,233	$	450	$	(63	)	$	95,086
Total fixed maturity AFS securities												$	92,429	$	3,981	$	2,430	$	(44	)	$	94,024

⁽¹⁾

Includes unrealized (gains) and losses on ~~impaired~~credit-impaired securities related to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.

The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities by contractual maturities (in millions) as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, were as follows:



	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	3,607	$	3,649	$	3,610	$	3,614
Due after one year through five years		18,525		18,658		16,276		16,590
Due after five years through ten years		17,025		17,013		17,902		18,499
Due after ten years		44,765		47,482		47,513		51,564
Subtotal		83,922		86,802		85,301		90,267
Structured securities (ABS, MBS, CLOs)		6,161		6,258		7,593		7,783
Total fixed maturity AFS securities	$	90,083	$	93,060	$	92,894	$	98,050

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”), of fixed maturity AFS securities (dollars in millions), aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018															As of March 31, 2019
	Less Than or Equal					Greater Than										Less Than or Equal					Greater Than
	to Twelve Months					Twelve Months					Total					to Twelve Months					Twelve Months					Total
				Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
	Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and
	Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	29,697		$	1,070	$	4,512		$	513	$	34,209		$	1,583	$	4,831		$	164	$	14,492		$	692	$	19,323		$	856
ABS		171			2		135			13		306			15		74			1		176			13		250			14
U.S. government bonds		113			1		18			2		131			3		6			-		28			1		34			1
RMBS		760			27		607			58		1,367			85		55			1		942			42		997			43
CMBS		525			16		58			4		583			20		10			-		297			3		307			3
CLOs		639			7		57			-		696			7		771			5		281			6		1,052			11
State and municipal bonds		215			5		85			9		300			14		156			1		135			7		291			8
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		47			2		118			21		165			23		12			2		151			22		163			24
Total AFS securities	$	32,167		$	1,130	$	5,590		$	620	$	37,757		$	1,750
Total fixed maturity AFS securities																$	5,915		$	174	$	16,502		$	786	$	22,417		$	960

Total number of AFS securities in an unrealized loss position															3,092
Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position																Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position														1,881



	As of December 31, 2017															As of December 31, 2018
	Less Than or Equal					Greater Than										Less Than or Equal					Greater Than
	to Twelve Months					Twelve Months					Total					to Twelve Months					Twelve Months					Total
				Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
	Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and			Fair		Losses and
	Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI		Value			OTTI
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	4,854		$	68	$	4,893		$	288	$	9,747		$	356	$	32,493		$	1,530	$	7,228		$	735	$	39,721		$	2,265
ABS		62			1		151			15		213			16		117			2		143			14		260			16
U.S. government bonds		156			-		19			1		175			1		70			1		23			1		93			2
RMBS		302			4		641			36		943			40		472			10		863			60		1,335			70
CMBS		113			-		60			3		173			3		470			11		82			5		552			16
CLOs		281			2		72			-		353			2		1,124			21		103			3		1,227			24
State and municipal bonds		34			-		93			6		127			6		404			8		96			10		500			18
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		20			-		126			22		146			22		96			6		133			28		229			34
Total fixed maturity securities		5,822			75		6,055			371		11,877			446
Equity AFS securities		22			14		8			3		30			17
Total AFS securities	$	5,844		$	89	$	6,063		$	374	$	11,907		$	463
Total fixed maturity AFS securities																$	35,246		$	1,589	$	8,671		$	856	$	43,917		$	2,445

Total number of AFS securities in an unrealized loss position															1,128
Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position																Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position														3,414

The fair value, gross unrealized losses, the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI (in millions) and number of fixed maturity AFS securities where the fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by greater than 20% were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018									As of March 31, 2019
								Number									Number
	Fair		Gross Unrealized					of		Fair		Gross Unrealized					of
	Value		Losses		OTTI		Securities (1)			Value		Losses		OTTI		Securities (1)
Less than six months	$	173	$	59	$	-			23	$	23	$	8	$	1			7
Six months or greater, but less than nine months		39		16		-			6		20		6		-			4
Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months		7		4		-			1		98		42		-			10
Twelve months or greater		117		47		8			28		152		52		22			32
Total	$	336	$	126	$	8			58	$	293	$	108	$	23			53

As of December 31, 2017

Number

Fair

Gross Unrealized

of

Value

Losses

OTTI

Securities (1)
Less than six months
$
156

$
57

$
1

26

Six months or greater, but less than nine months

2

1

-

4

Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months

15

8

-

7

Twelve months or greater

215

78

10

49

Total
$
388

$
144

$
11

86

	As of December 31, 2018
								Number
	Fair		Gross Unrealized					of
	Value		Losses		OTTI		Securities (1)
Less than six months	$	395	$	124	$	1			45
Six months or greater, but less than nine months		96		49		-			11
Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months		11		8		-			2
Twelve months or greater		143		74		8			32
Total	$	645	$	255	$	9			90

⁽¹⁾

We may reflect a security in more than one aging category based on various purchase dates.

We regularly review our investment holdings for OTTI. Our gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI, on fixed maturity AFS securities ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1.2~~$1.5 billion for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. As discussed further below, we believe the unrealized loss position as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, did not represent OTTI as (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell ~~these~~the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the estimated future cash flows were equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis of the debt securities.

Based upon this evaluation as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, management believes we have the ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations (e.g., insurance premiums and fees and investment income) to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety without requiring the sale of our temporarily-impaired securities.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our corporate bond securities were attributable primarily to widening credit spreads and rising interest rates since purchase. We performed a detailed analysis of the financial performance of the underlying issuers and determined that we expected to recover the entire amortized cost ~~for~~of each temporarily-impaired security.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and ABS were attributable primarily to widening credit spreads and rising interest rates since purchase. We assessed for credit impairment using a cash flow model that incorporates key assumptions including default rates, severities and prepayment rates. We estimated losses for a security by forecasting the underlying loans in each transaction. The forecasted loan performance was used to project cash flows to the various tranches in the structure, as applicable. Our forecasted cash flows also considered, as applicable, independent industry analyst reports and forecasts and other independent market data. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared to our subordination or other credit enhancement, we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each temporarily-impaired security.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities were attributable primarily to wider credit spreads caused by illiquidity in the market and subordination within the capital structure, as well as credit risk of underlying issuers. For our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities, we evaluated the financial performance of the underlying issuers based upon credit performance and investment ratings and determined that we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each temporarily-impaired security.

Changes in the amount of credit loss of OTTI recognized in net income (loss) where the portion related to other factors was recognized in OCI (in millions) on fixed maturity AFS securities were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-period	$	378		$	393		$	378		$	430
Balance as of beginning-of-year													$	355		$	378
Increases attributable to:
Credit losses on securities for which an
OTTI was not previously recognized		1			4			2			5			6			2
Credit losses on securities for which an
OTTI was previously recognized		-			-			1			3			2			-
Decreases attributable to:
Securities sold, paid down or matured		(4	)		(7	)		(6	)		(48	)		(4	)		(2	)
Balance as of end-of-period	$	375		$	390		$	375		$	390		$	359		$	378

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ we recorded credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized as we determined the cash flows expected to be collected would not be sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security. The credit losses we recorded on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized were attributable primarily to one or a combination of the following reasons:

Failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments;

Deterioration of creditworthiness of the issuer;

Deterioration of conditions specifically related to the security;

Deterioration of fundamentals of the industry in which the issuer operates; and

Deterioration of the rating of the security by a rating agency.

We recognize the OTTI attributed to the noncredit portion as a separate component in OCI referred to as unrealized OTTI on fixed maturity AFS securities.

~~Mortgage Loans on Real Estate~~

~~See Note 1 in our 2017 Form 10-K for information regarding our accounting policy relating to mortgage loans on real estate.~~

Mortgage loans on real estate principally involve commercial real estate. The commercial loans are geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 22% and 21%of mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively, and Texas which accounted for 12% of mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017.

~~The following provides the current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):~~

As of
As of

June 30,
December 31,

2018

2017

Current

$
12,231

$
10,762

60 to 90 days past due

2

-

Greater than 90 days past due

3

3

Valuation allowance associated with impaired mortgage loans on real estate

(2
)

(3
)
Unamortized premium (discount)

(17
)

-

Total carrying value

$
12,217

$
10,762

The number of impaired mortgage loans on real estate, each of which had an associated specific valuation allowance, and the carrying value of impaired mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) were as follows:

As of

As of

June 30,
December 31,

2018

2017

Number of impaired mortgage loans on real estate

2

3

Principal balance of impaired mortgage loans on real estate

$
8

$
11

Valuation allowance associated with impaired mortgage loans on real estate

(2
)

(3
)
Carrying value of impaired mortgage loans on real estate

$
6

$
8

~~The changes in the valuation allowance associated with impaired mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Balance as of beginning-of-period

$
3

$
2

$
3

$
2

Additions

-

-

-

-

Charge-offs, net of recoveries

(1
)

-

(1
)

-

Balance as of end-of-period

$
2

$
2

$
2

$
2

~~Additional information related to impaired mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Average carrying value for impaired mortgage loans on real estate
$
7

$
5

$
7

$
5

Interest income recognized on impaired mortgage loans on real estate

-

-

-

-

Interest income collected on impaired mortgage loans on real estate

-

-

-

-

As described in Note 1 in our 2017 Form 10-K, we use the loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our mortgage loans on real estate, which were as follows (dollars in millions):

As of June 30, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

Debt-

Debt-

Service

Service

Carrying

% of

Coverage

Carrying

% of

Coverage

Loan-to-Value Ratio
Value

Total

Ratio

Value

Total

Ratio

Less than 65%
$
11,043

90.4%

2.31

$
9,642

89.6%

2.26

65% to 74%

1,081

8.8%

1.84

1,000

9.3%

1.94

75% to 100%

87

0.7%

1.03

112

1.0%

0.97

Greater than 100%

6

0.1%

0.77

8

0.1%

0.82

Total mortgage loans on real estate
$
12,217

100.0%

$
10,762

100.0%

~~Alternative Investments~~

As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, alternative investments included investments in 238 and 224 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolios represented approximately 1% of our overall invested assets.

~~Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Investments~~

~~The detail of the realized gain (loss) related to certain investments (in millions) was as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Fixed maturity AFS securities: (1)

Gross gains
$
1

$
3

$
16

$
11

Gross losses

(12
)

(13
)

(45
)

(25
)
Equity AFS securities:

Gross gains

-

-

-

1

Gain (loss) on other investments (2)

4

(2
)

6

(5
)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

and changes in other contract holder funds

(6
)

(6
)

(11
)

(13
)
Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments, pre-tax
$
(13
)
$
(18
)
$
(34
)
$
(31
)

⁽¹⁾

~~These amounts are represented net of related fair value hedging activity. See Note 6 for more information.~~

⁽²⁾

~~Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.~~

~~Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI (in millions) that were recognized in net income (loss) and included in realized gain (loss) on AFS securities above, were as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss)

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
(1
)
$
(4
)
$
(3
)
$
(5
)
ABS

-

-

-

(1
)
RMBS

-

-

-

(1
)
State and municipal bonds

-

-

-

(1
)
Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss)

(1
)

(4
)

(3
)

(8
)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

-

-

-

-

Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss), pre-tax
$
(1
)
$
(4
)
$
(3
)
$
(8
)

~~We recognized less than $1 million of OTTI in OCI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.~~

Determination of Credit Losses on Corporate Bonds ~~and ABS~~

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we reviewed our corporate bond ~~and ABS portfolios~~portfolio for potential ~~shortfall~~shortfalls in contractual principal and interest based on numerous subjective and objective inputs. The factors used to determine the amount of credit loss for each individual security, include, but are not limited to, ~~near term~~near-term risk, substantial discrepancy between book and market value, sector or company-specific volatility, negative operating trends and trading levels wider than peers.

Credit ratings express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities rated investment grade, ~~that is~~ those rated BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) Rating Services or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), are generally considered by the rating agencies and market participants to be low credit risk. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, 96% of the fair value of our corporate bond portfolio was rated investment grade. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the portion of our corporate bond portfolio rated below investment grade had an amortized cost of ~~$3.4~~$3.3 billion and ~~$3.5~~$3.2 billion, respectively, and a fair value of $3.2 billion and ~~$3.5~~$3.0 billion, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, 98% of the fair value of our ABS portfolio was rated investment grade. As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the portion of our ABS portfolio rated below investment grade had an amortized cost of $48 million and $46 million, respectively, and a fair value of $46 million and $43 million, respectively. Based upon the analysis discussed above, we believe as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, that we would recover the amortized cost of each ~~investment grade~~ corporate ~~bond and ABS security.~~bond.

Determination of Credit Losses on MBS and ABS

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, default rates were projected by considering underlying MBS and ABS loan performance and collateral type. Projected default rates on existing delinquencies vary ~~between 10% to 100%~~ depending on loan type and severity of delinquency status. In addition, we estimate the potential contributions of currently performing loans that may become delinquent in the future based on the change in delinquencies and loan liquidations experienced in the recent history. Finally, we develop a default rate timing curve by aggregating the defaults for all loans in the pool (delinquent loans, foreclosure and real estate owned and new delinquencies from currently performing loans) and the associated loan-level loss severities.

We use certain available loan characteristics such as lien status, loan sizes and occupancy to estimate the loss severity of loans. Second lien loans are assigned 100% severity, if defaulted. For first lien loans, we assume a minimum of 30% severity with higher severity assumed for investor properties and further adjusted by housing price assumptions. With the default rate timing curve and loan-level loss severity, we derive the future expected credit losses.

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

The following provides the current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):



	As of March 31, 2019									As of December 31, 2018
	Commercial			Residential			Total			Commercial			Residential		Total
Current	$	13,598		$	401		$	13,999		$	13,029		$	239	$	13,268
60 to 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			1		1
Greater than 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			-		-
Valuation allowance		-			(1	)		(1	)		-			-		-
Unamortized premium (discount)		(16	)		13			(3	)		(17	)		8		(9	)
Total carrying value	$	13,582		$	415		$	13,997		$	13,012		$	248	$	13,260

We establish a valuation allowance to provide for the risk of credit losses inherent in our portfolio. The valuation allowance includes specific valuation allowances for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as general valuation allowances for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property risk or market specific risk has not been identified but for which we anticipate a loss has occurred.

For our commercial mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of March 31, 2019, or December 31, 2018.

For our residential mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of March 31, 2019, or December 31, 2018. The general allowance established on residential mortgage loans as of March 31, 2019 was $1 million. As of December 31, 2018, the general allowance established on residential mortgage loans was less than $1 million.

The changes in the valuation allowance associated with impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	-	$	3
Additions		-		-
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		-		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	-	$	3

Additional information related to impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Average carrying value for impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate	$	-	$	8
Interest income recognized on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-
Interest income collected on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-

We use the loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our commercial mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
				Debt-				Debt-
				Service				Service
	Carrying		% of	Coverage	Carrying		% of	Coverage
Loan-to-Value Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio
Less than 65%	$	12,368	91.1%	2.27	$	11,716	90.1%	2.30
65% to 74%		1,175	8.6%	1.74		1,238	9.5%	1.76
75% to 100%		39	0.3%	1.20		58	0.4%	0.95
Total	$	13,582	100.0%		$	13,012	100.0%

We use loan performance status as the primary credit quality indicator for our residential mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019			As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		% of	Carrying		% of
Performance Indicator	Value		Total	Value		Total
Performing	$	414	99.5%	$	247	99.6%
Nonperforming		2	0.5%		1	0.4%
Total	$	416	100.0%	$	248	100.0%

Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 23% of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and Texas, which accounted for 12% of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.

Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 30% and 34%of residential mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively, and Florida, which accounted for 19% of residential mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.

Alternative Investments

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, alternative investments included investments in 246 and 237 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 2% and 1% of our overall invested assets, respectively.

Realized Gain (Loss)

Details underlying realized gain (loss) (in millions) reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Gross gains	$	12		$	14
Gross losses		(27	)		(30	)
Gross OTTI		(8	)		(2	)
Gain (loss) on other investments (1)		5			2
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
and changes in other contract holder funds		(2	)		(5	)
Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments		(20	)		(21	)
Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments (2)		(121	)		1
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivatives results: (3)
Gross gain (loss)		(35	)		(1	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		1			-
Variable annuity net derivatives results: (4)
Gross gain (loss)		(215	)		33
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		28			-
Total realized gain (loss)	$	(362	)	$	12

⁽¹⁾

Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $6 million and less than $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

⁽²⁾

Represents changes in the fair values of certain derivative investments (not including those associated with our variable and indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivative results), reinsurance related embedded derivatives and trading securities. See Note 8 for information regarding modified coinsurance.

⁽³⁾

Represents the net difference between the change in the fair value of the S&P 500 Index® (“S&P 500”) call options that we hold and the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL contracts along with changes in the fair value of embedded derivative liabilities related to index call options we may purchase in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products.

⁽⁴⁾

Includes the net difference in the change in embedded derivative reserves of our guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) riders and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge the change in embedded derivative reserves on our GLB riders and the benefit ratio unlocking on our GLB and GDB riders, including the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments.

Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in net income (loss) and included in realized gain (loss) on fixed maturity AFS securities above and the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	(6	)	$	(2	)
ABS		(1	)		-
RMBS		(1	)		-
Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss)		(8	)		(2	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			-
Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss)	$	(8	)	$	(2	)

Portion of OTTI Recognized in OCI
Gross OTTI recognized in OCI	$	16		$	-
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		-
Net portion of OTTI recognized in OCI	$	15		$	-

Payables for Collateral on Investments

The carrying value of the payables for collateral on investments ~~(in millions)~~ included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the fair value of the related investments or collateral (in millions) consisted of the following:



	As of June 30, 2018				As of December 31, 2017				As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value
Collateral payable for derivative investments (1)	$	468	$	468	$	765	$	765	$	695	$	695	$	637	$	637
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements (2)		142		138		222		213		136		131		88		85
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements (3)		909		977		530		588		151		187		150		185
Investments pledged for Federal Home Loan Bank of
Indianapolis (“FHLBI”) (4)		3,180		4,712		2,900		4,235		4,380		6,570		3,930		5,923
Total payables for collateral on investments	$	4,699	$	6,295	$	4,417	$	5,801	$	5,362	$	7,583	$	4,805	$	6,830

⁽¹⁾

We obtain collateral based upon contractual provisions with our counterparties. These agreements take into consideration the counterparties’ credit rating as compared to ours, the fair value of the derivative investments and specified thresholds that if exceeded result in the receipt of cash that is typically invested in cash and invested cash. See Note 6 for additional information.

⁽²⁾

Our pledged securities under securities lending agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally obtain collateral in an amount equal to 102% and 105% of the fair value of the domestic and foreign securities, respectively. We value collateral daily and obtain additional collateral when deemed appropriate. The cash received in our securities lending program is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.

⁽³⁾

Our pledged securities under repurchase agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. ~~We obtain~~The collateral ~~in an amount equal~~requirements are generally 80% to 95% of the fair value of the securities, and our agreements with third parties contain contractual provisions to allow for additional collateral to be obtained when necessary. The cash received in our repurchase program is typically invested in fixed maturity AFS securities.

⁽⁴⁾

Our pledged investments for FHLBI are included in fixed maturity AFS securities and mortgage loans on real estate on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 105% to 115% of the fair value for fixed maturity AFS securities and 155% to 175% of the fair value for mortgage loans on real estate. The cash received in these transactions is primarily invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.

Increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments (in millions) consisted of the following:



	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019		2018
Collateral payable for derivative investments	$	(297	)	$	160		$	58	$	(83	)
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements		(80	)		(8	)		48		(68	)
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements		379			5			1		(1	)
Investments pledged for FHLBI		280			(200	)		450		-
Total increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments	$	282		$	(43	)	$	557	$	(152	)

We have elected not to offset our repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions in our financial statements. The remaining contractual maturities of repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings (in millions) were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018										As of March 31, 2019
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total		Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	760	$	-	$	149	$	909	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	151
Total		-		760		-		149		909
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		142		-		-		-		142		136		-		-		-		136
Total		142		-		-		-		142
Total gross secured borrowings	$	142	$	760	$	-	$	149	$	1,051	$	136	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	287

As of December 31, 2017

Overnight and Continuous

Up to 30 Days

30 - 90 Days

Greater Than 90 Days

Total

Repurchase Agreements

Corporate bonds
$
-

$
100

$
280

$
150

$
530

Total

-

100

280

150

530

Securities Lending

Corporate bonds

222

-

-

-

222

Total

222

-

-

-

222

Total gross secured borrowings
$
222

$
100

$
280

$
150

$
752


	As of December 31, 2018
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	150
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		88		-		-		-		88
Total gross secured borrowings	$	88	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	238

We accept collateral in the form of securities in connection with repurchase agreements. In instances where we are permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received, we report the fair value of the collateral received and a related obligation to return the collateral in the financial statements. In addition, we receive securities in connection with securities borrowing agreements which we are permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the fair value of all collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge was ~~$531~~$548 million. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, we have re-pledged ~~$364~~$536 million of this collateral to cover initial margin and over-the-counter collateral requirements on certain derivative investments.

Investment Commitments

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our investment commitments were ~~$1.9~~$2.0 billion, which included ~~$801~~$823 million of LPs, ~~$570~~$669 million of mortgage loans on real estate and ~~$501~~$528 million of private placement securities.

Concentrations of Financial Instruments

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our most significant investments in one issuer were our investments in securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation with a fair value of $1.4 billion ~~and $1.3 billion, respectively,~~ or 1% of our invested assets portfolio, and our investments in securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association with a fair value of $1.3 billion ~~and $1.0 billion, respectively,~~ or 1% of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the financial services industry and the consumer non-cyclical industry with a fair value of $15.3 billion and $15.1 billion, respectively, or 13% and 12%, respectively, of our invested assets portfolio. As of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the consumer non-cyclical industry ~~with a fair value of $14.2 billion~~ and ~~$15.0 billion, respectively, or 13% of our invested assets portfolio, and our investments in securities in~~ the ~~utilities~~financial services industry with a fair value of ~~$13.7~~$14.5 billion and ~~$14.3~~$14.2 billion, respectively, or ~~12%~~13% and ~~13%, respectively,~~12% of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.

6. Derivative Instruments

We maintain an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk and credit risk. ~~See Note 1~~We assess these risks by continually identifying and monitoring changes in our ~~2017 Form 10-K~~exposures that may adversely affect expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.

Derivative activities are monitored by various management committees. The committees are responsible for ~~a detailed discussion~~overseeing the implementation of various hedging strategies that are developed through the ~~accounting treatment for derivative instruments. See Note 6 in our 2017 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion~~analysis of ~~our derivative instruments~~financial simulation models and ~~use of them in~~other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are incorporated into our overall risk management ~~strategy, which information is incorporated herein by reference.~~ strategies.

See Note 1413 for additional disclosures related to the fair value of our derivative ~~instruments.~~instruments and Note 4 for derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIEs.

We adopted ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, in 2019. See Note 2 for additional information.

Interest Rate Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps

We use forward-starting interest rate swaps designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations related to the forecasted purchases of certain assets and anticipated issuances of fixed-rate securities.

We also use forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure within our life products related to the forecasted purchases of certain assets.

Interest Rate Cap Corridors

We use interest rate cap corridors to provide a level of protection from the effect of rising interest rates for certain life insurance products and annuity contracts. Interest rate cap corridors involve purchasing an interest rate cap at a specific cap rate and selling an interest rate cap with a higher cap rate. For each corridor, the amount of quarterly payments, if any, is determined by the rate at which the underlying index rate resets above the original capped rate. The corridor limits the benefit the purchaser can receive as the related interest rate index rises above the higher capped rate. There is no additional liability to us other than the purchase price associated with the interest rate cap corridor.

Interest Rate Futures

We use interest rate futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures contracts require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

We also use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate risk of floating-rate bond coupon payments by replicating a fixed-rate bond.

Finally, we use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as fair value hedges to hedge against changes in the fair value of certain fixed-rate long-term debt and fixed maturity securities due to interest rate risks.

Treasury and Reverse Treasury Locks

We use treasury locks designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate exposure related to our issuance of fixed-rate securities or the anticipated future cash flows of floating-rate fixed maturity securities due to changes in interest rates. In addition, we use reverse treasury locks designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate exposure related to the anticipated purchase of fixed-rate securities or the anticipated future cash flows of floating-rate fixed maturity securities due to changes in interest rates. These derivatives are primarily structured to hedge interest rate risk inherent in the assumptions used to price certain liabilities.

Foreign Currency Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our foreign currency risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Currency Futures

We use currency futures to hedge foreign exchange risk associated with certain options in variable annuity products. Currency futures exchange one currency for another at a specified date in the future at a specified exchange rate.

Foreign Currency Swaps

We use foreign currency swaps designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges, to hedge foreign exchange risk of investments in fixed maturity securities denominated in foreign currencies. A foreign currency swap is a contractual agreement to exchange one currency for another at specified dates in the future at a specified exchange rate.

Equity Market Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our equity market risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Call Options Based on the S&P 500

We use call options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component, where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500. Contract holders may elect to rebalance index options at renewal dates, either annually or biannually. As of each renewal date, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase call options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period.

Consumer Price Index Swaps

We use consumer price index swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in fixed annuity products. Consumer price index swaps are contracts entered into at no cost and whose payoff is the difference between the consumer price index inflation rate and the fixed-rate determined as of inception.

Equity Futures

We use equity futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures contracts

require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.

Put Options

We use put options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. Put options are contracts that require counterparties to pay us at a specified future date the amount, if any, by which a specified equity index is less than the strike rate stated in the agreement, applied to a notional amount.

Total Return Swaps

We use total return swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

In addition, we use total return swaps to hedge a portion of the liability related to our deferred compensation plans. We receive the total return on a portfolio of indexes and pay a floating-rate of interest.

Variance Swaps

We use variance swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. Variance swaps are contracts entered into at no cost whose payoff is the difference between the realized variance rate of an underlying index and the fixed variance rate determined as of inception of the contract.

Credit Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our credit risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Credit Default Swaps – Buying Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

We buy credit default swaps to hedge against a drop in bond prices due to credit concerns of certain bond issuers. A credit default swap allows us to put the bond back to the counterparty at par upon a default event by the bond issuer. A default event is defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay, obligation acceleration or restructuring.

Credit Default Swaps – Selling Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

We sell credit default swaps to offer credit protection to contract holders and investors. The credit default swaps hedge the contract holders and investors against a drop in bond prices due to credit concerns of certain bond issuers. A credit default swap allows the investor to put the bond back to us at par upon a default event by the bond issuer. A default event is defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay, obligation acceleration or restructuring.

Embedded Derivatives

We have embedded derivatives that include:

GLB Reserves Embedded Derivatives

We use a hedging strategy designed to mitigate the risk and income statement volatility caused by changes in the equity markets, interest rates and volatility associated with GLBs offered in our variable annuity products, including products with GWB and GIB features. Changes in the value of the hedge contracts due to changes in equity markets, interest rates and implied volatilities hedge the income statement effect of changes in embedded derivative GLB reserves caused by those same factors. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these hedge positions may not be totally effective in offsetting changes in the embedded derivative reserve due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets and interest rates, market volatility, contract holder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices,

divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments and our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.

Certain features of these guarantees have elements of both insurance benefits accounted for under the Financial Services – Insurance – Claim Costs and Liabilities for Future Policy Benefits Subtopic of the FASB ASC (“benefit reserves”) and embedded derivatives accounted for under the Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC (“embedded derivative reserves”). We calculate the value of the benefit reserves and the embedded derivative reserves based on the specific characteristics of each GLB feature.

Indexed Annuity and IUL Contracts Embedded Derivatives

Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component, where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500. Contract holders may elect to rebalance index options at renewal dates, either annually or biannually. As of each renewal date, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase S&P 500 call options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period.

Reinsurance Related Embedded Derivatives

We have certain modified coinsurance arrangements and coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance arrangements with embedded derivatives related to the withheld assets of the related funds. These derivatives are considered total return swaps with contractual returns that are attributable to various assets and liabilities associated with these reinsurance arrangements.

We have derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks whose notional or contract amounts exceed the related credit exposure. Outstanding derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks (in millions) were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018						As of December 31, 2017						As of March 31, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
	Notional		Fair Value				Notional		Fair Value				Notional		Fair Value				Notional		Fair Value
	Amounts		Asset		Liability		Amounts		Asset		Liability		Amounts		Asset		Liability		Amounts		Asset		Liability
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	2,867	$	85	$	21	$	3,007	$	46	$	84	$	2,567	$	64	$	51	$	2,741	$	70	$	9
Foreign currency contracts (1)		2,028		93		73		1,804		79		79		2,442		153		36		2,326		167		39
Total cash flow hedges		4,895		178		94		4,811		125		163		5,009		217		87		5,067		237		48
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		1,275		46		128		1,438		254		174		1,261		80		163		1,268		55		137
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (1)		90,678		393		195		72,937		657		127		95,308		588		105		100,628		464		138
Foreign currency contracts (1)		134		-		-		22		-		-		11		-		-		47		-		-
Equity market contracts (1)		31,049		521		427		31,090		562		557		32,795		613		404		30,487		676		162
Credit contracts (1)		-		-		-		52		-		-		60		-		-		-		-		-
Embedded derivatives:
Guaranteed living benefit ("GLB")
direct (2)		-		1,248		-		-		903		-
GLB direct (2)														-		439		-		-		123		-
GLB ceded (2) (3)		-		41		131		-		51		67		-		50		8		-		72		-
Reinsurance related (4)		-		-		25		-		-		57		-		-		177		-		-		3
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (2) (5)		-		29		1,400		-		11		1,418		-		872		1,730		-		902		1,305
Total derivative instruments	$	128,031	$	2,456	$	2,400	$	110,350	$	2,563	$	2,563	$	134,444	$	2,859	$	2,674	$	137,497	$	2,529	$	1,793

⁽¹⁾

Reported in derivative investments and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽²⁾

Reported in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽³⁾

Reported in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in reinsurance related embedded derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁵⁾

Reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments (in millions) was as follows:



	Remaining Life as of June 30, 2018												Remaining Life as of March 31, 2019
	Less Than		1 - 5		6 - 10		11 - 30		Over 30				Less Than		1 - 5		6 - 10		11 - 30		Over 30
	1 Year		Years		Years		Years		Years		Total		1 Year		Years		Years		Years		Years		Total
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	13,347	$	14,517	$	46,210	$	19,533	$	1,213	$	94,820	$	11,465	$	9,727	$	51,648	$	24,583	$	1,713	$	99,136
Foreign currency contracts (2)		165		260		601		1,113		23		2,162		66		264		764		1,278		81		2,453
Equity market contracts		18,813		8,864		390		14		2,968		31,049		22,440		5,198		1,996		13		3,148		32,795
Credit contracts														-		-		60		-		-		60
Total derivative instruments
with notional amounts	$	32,325	$	23,641	$	47,201	$	20,660	$	4,204	$	128,031	$	33,971	$	15,189	$	54,468	$	25,874	$	4,942	$	134,444

⁽¹⁾

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was April 2067.

⁽²⁾

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was September 2049.

The following amounts (in millions) were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:


	As of March 31, 2019

				Cumulative
				Fair Value Hedging
				Adjustment Included
	Amortized Cost			in the Amortized
	of the Hedged			Cost of the Hedged
	Assets (Liabilities)			Assets (Liabilities)
Line Items in which the Hedged Items are Recorded
Fixed maturity AFS securities, at fair value	$	457		$	161
Long-term debt (1)		(976	)		(101	)

⁽¹⁾

The balance includes $(122) million of unamortized adjustments from discontinued hedges as of March 31, 2019.

2021

The change in our unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments ~~in AOCI~~within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	(29	)	$	49		$	139		$	(29	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period:
Cumulative effect from adoption of
new accounting standard		(6	)		-			-			(6	)
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts		106			1			(47	)		53
Foreign currency contracts		(19	)		45			11			(37	)
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment		50			(75	)		(14	)		(50	)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		4			(8	)		6			4
Income tax benefit (expense)		(29	)		13			10			7
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses)
included in net income (loss):
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		2			2			1			1
Interest rate contracts (2)		(2	)		(9	)		(1	)		(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)		11			9			7			5
Foreign currency contracts (3)		-			5			1			-
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(2	)		(1	)		(1	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(2	)		(2	)		(1	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	69		$	22		$	99		$	(60	)

⁽¹⁾

The OCI offset is reported within net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

The OCI offset is reported within interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

The OCI offset is reported within realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The effects of qualifying and non-qualifying hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



		Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
		Realized			Net		Commissions			Interest
		Gain			Investment			and Other		and Debt
		(Loss)			Income			Expenses		Expense
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value
or Cash Flow Hedges are Recorded	$	(362	)	$	1,251		$	1,176	$	71

Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items		-			24			-		(34	)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments		-			(24	)		-		34
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		-			1			-		(1	)
Foreign currency contracts
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		1			7			-		-

Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts		357			-			-		-
Equity market contracts		(458	)		-			-		-
Embedded derivatives:
GLB		286			-			-		-
Reinsurance related		(174	)		-			-		-
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts		(239	)		-			-		-

2123

The gains (losses) on derivative instruments (in millions) recorded within income (loss) from continuing operations on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,							March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017				2018
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	1		$	1		$	2		$	2			$	1
Interest rate contracts (2)		2			(5	)		(2	)		(9	)			(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)		5			4			11			9				5
Foreign currency contracts (3)		-			-			-			5
Total cash flow hedges		8			-			11			7				3
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		(4	)		(6	)		(9	)		(13	)			(4	)
Interest rate contracts (2)		-			7			6			15				6
Interest rate contracts (3)		14			(9	)		47			-				33
Total fair value hedges		10			(8	)		44			2				35
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (3)		(96	)		193			(410	)		143				(314	)
Foreign currency contracts (3)		-			(2	)		2			1				2
Equity market contracts (3)															7
Equity market contracts ~~(3)~~(4)		(89	)		(289	)		(80	)		(817	)			(2	)
Equity market contracts (4)		3			5			1			14
Embedded derivatives:					-						-
GLB (3)		113			72			270			669				157
Reinsurance related (3)		9			(3	)		32			-				23
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (3)		(62	)		(64	)		(10	)		(184	)			52
Total derivative instruments	$	(104	)	$	(96	)	$	(140	)	$	(165	)		$	(37	)

⁽¹⁾

Reported in net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

Reported in interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

Reported in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Gains (losses) recognized as a component of OCI (in millions) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges were as follows:



	For the Three					For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended					Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,							March 31,
	2018		2017			2018			2017				2018
Offset to net investment income	$	6	$	5		$	13		$	11			$	6
Offset to realized gain (loss)		-		-			-			5
Offset to interest and debt expense		2		(5	)		(2	)		(9	)			(3	)

As of ~~June 30, 2018, $8~~March 31, 2019, $35 million of the deferred net gains (losses) on derivative instruments in AOCI were expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would be due primarily to interest rate variances related to our interest rate swap agreements.

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ there were no material reclassifications to earnings due to hedged firm commitments no longer deemed probable or due to hedged forecasted transactions that had not occurred by the end of the originally specified time period.

As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we did not have any exposure related to credit default swaps for which we are the seller.

2224

~~As of December 31, 2017 information related to our credit default swaps for which we are the seller (dollars in millions) was as follows:~~

As of December 31, 2017

Credit

Reason

Nature

Rating of

Number

Maximum

for

of
Underlying
of

Fair

Potential

Credit Contract Type

Maturity

Entering

Recourse
Obligation (1)
Instruments

Value (2)

Payout

Basket credit default swaps

12/20/2022

(3)

(4)

BBB+

1

$
1

$
52

1

$
1

$
52

⁽¹⁾

~~Represents average credit ratings based on the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Ratings, as scaled to the corresponding S&P ratings.~~

⁽²⁾

~~Broker quotes are used to determine the market value of our credit default swaps.~~

⁽³⁾

~~Credit default swaps were entered into in order to hedge the liability exposure on certain variable annuity products.~~

⁽⁴⁾

~~Sellers do not have the right to demand indemnification or compensation from third parties in case of a loss (payment) on the contract.~~

~~Details underlying the associated collateral of our credit default swaps for which we are the seller if credit risk-related contingent features were triggered (in millions) were as follows:~~

As of

As of

June 30,
December 31,

2018

2017

Maximum potential payout

$
-

$
52

Less: Counterparty thresholds

-

-

Maximum collateral potentially required to post

$
-

$
52

Certain of our credit default swap agreements contain contractual provisions that allow for the netting of collateral with our counterparties related to all of our collateralized financing transactions that we have outstanding. If these netting agreements were not in place, we would have been required to post collateral if the market value was less than zero.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on various derivative contracts and reflect assumptions regarding the credit or non-performance risk (“NPR”). The NPR is based upon assumptions for each counterparty’s credit spread over the estimated weighted average life of the counterparty exposure less collateral held. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the NPR adjustment was zero. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by entering into agreements with financial institutions with long-standing, superior performance records. Additionally, we maintain a policy of requiring derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement. We are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, our insurance subsidiaries have agreed to maintain certain financial strength or claims-paying ratings. A downgrade below these levels could result in termination of derivative contracts, at which time any amounts payable by us would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contracts. In certain transactions, we and the counterparty have entered into a credit support annex requiring either party to post collateral when net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. The amount of such exposure is essentially the net replacement cost or market value less collateral held for such agreements with each counterparty if the net market value is in our favor. As of ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our exposure was zero.

The amounts recognized (in millions) by S&P credit rating of counterparty, for which we had the right to reclaim cash collateral or were obligated to return cash collateral, were as follows:



	As of June 30, 2018					As of December 31, 2017					As of March 31, 2019					As of December 31, 2018
	Collateral		Collateral			Collateral		Collateral			Collateral		Collateral			Collateral		Collateral
	Posted by		Posted by			Posted by		Posted by			Posted by		Posted by			Posted by		Posted by
S&P	Counter-		LNC			Counter-		LNC			Counter-		LNC			Counter-		LNC
Credit	Party		(Held by			Party		(Held by			Party		(Held by			Party		(Held by
Rating of	(Held by		Counter-			(Held by		Counter-			(Held by		Counter-			(Held by		Counter-
Counterparty	LNC)		Party)			LNC)		Party)			LNC)		Party)			LNC)		Party)
AA-	$	79	$	(6	)	$	116	$	(1	)	$	56	$	(3	)	$	33	$	(3	)
A+		64		(67	)		242		(453	)		389		(281	)		296		(96	)
A		140		(17	)		170		(120	)		5		-			106		(56	)
A-		184		-			237		(3	)		244		(1	)		4		-
BBB+		-		-			-		(4	)		-		-			197		-
	$	467	$	(90	)	$	765	$	(581	)	$	694	$	(285	)	$	636	$	(155	)

Balance Sheet Offsetting

Information related to the effects of offsetting (in millions) was as follows:



		As of June 30, 2018										As of March 31, 2019
					Embedded										Embedded
	Derivative										Derivative
	Instruments							Total			Instruments							Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	911			$	1,318	$	2,229			$	1,350			$	1,361	$	2,711
Gross amounts offset			(327	)			-		(327	)			(369	)			-		(369	)
Net amount of assets			584				1,318		1,902				981				1,361		2,342
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(467	)			-		(467	)			(694	)			-		(694	)
Non-cash collateral			(78	)			-		(78	)			(116	)			-		(116	)
Net amount		$	39			$	1,318	$	1,357			$	171			$	1,361	$	1,532

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	604			$	1,556	$	2,160			$	910			$	1,915	$	2,825
Gross amounts offset			(227	)			-		(227	)			(148	)			-		(148	)
Net amount of liabilities			377				1,556		1,933				762				1,915		2,677
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(90	)			-		(90	)			(285	)			-		(285	)
Non-cash collateral			(287	)			-		(287	)			(346	)			-		(346	)
Net amount		$	-			$	1,556	$	1,556			$	131			$	1,915	$	2,046

2425


		As of December 31, 2017										As of December 31, 2018
					Embedded										Embedded
	Derivative										Derivative
	Instruments							Total			Instruments							Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	1,301			$	965	$	2,266			$	1,330			$	1,097	$	2,427
Gross amounts offset			(386	)			-		(386	)			(223	)			-		(223	)
Net amount of assets			915				965		1,880				1,107				1,097		2,204
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(765	)			-		(765	)			(636	)			-		(636	)
Non-cash collateral													(58	)			-		(58	)
Net amount		$	150			$	965	$	1,115			$	413			$	1,097	$	1,510

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	955			$	1,542	$	2,497			$	784			$	1,308	$	2,092
Gross amounts offset			(296	)			-		(296	)			(103	)			-		(103	)
Net amount of liabilities			659				1,542		2,201				681				1,308		1,989
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(581	)			-		(581	)			(155	)			-		(155	)
Non-cash collateral													(190	)			-		(190	)
Net amount		$	78			$	1,542	$	1,620			$	336			$	1,308	$	1,644

7. Federal Income Taxes

The effective tax rate is the ratio of tax expense over pre-tax income (loss). The effective tax rate was ~~15% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to 23%~~6% and 16% for the ~~corresponding periods in 2017.~~three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The effective tax rate on pre-tax income was lower than the prevailing corporate federal income tax ~~rate.~~rate of 21%. Differences inbetween the effective rates and the ~~U.S. statutory rates of 21% and 35% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively,~~corporate federal income tax rate were primarily the result of the separate account dividends-received deduction, certain tax preferred investment income, foreign tax credits and other tax preference items.

The ~~SEC previously issued rules that allow for a one year measurement period after~~current quarter’s effective tax rate is lower than the enactment of the Tax Act to finalize calculations and recording of the related tax impacts. Subsequent to the Tax Act, we have continued to review and analyze the provisions of the Tax Act, including the actual and potential impact of the reductioncomparable quarter in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and the impact of specific life insurance provisions on our financial statements. While we do not anticipate any significant changes to amounts currently recorded, any additional adjustments to amounts recordedprior year primarily as a result of an increased level of realized losses and the ~~Tax Act will be made~~associated tax benefit resulting from the application of the corporate federal income tax rate of 21%.

8. Reinsurance

Modified Coinsurance Reinsurance Transaction

Some portions of our annuity business have been reinsured on a modified coinsurance (“Modco”) basis with other companies. In a Modco program, we as the ceding company retain the reserves, as well as the assets backing those reserves, and the reinsurer shares proportionally in all financial terms of the reinsured policies based on their respective percentage of the risk. Effective October 1, 2018, we entered into one such Modco agreement with Athene Holding Ltd. (“Athene”) to reinsure fixed and fixed indexed annuity products. We hold assets in support of reserves associated with the transaction in a Modco investment portfolio that included fixed maturity AFS securities, trading securities, equity securities, commercial mortgage loans, derivative investments, other investments and cash that had carrying values of $5.1 billion, $1.9 billion, $49 million, $186 million, $120 million, $85 million and $78 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2019. In addition, the portfolio was supported by $237 million of over-collateralization and a $219 million letter of credit as of March 31, 2019.

In repositioning the Modco investment portfolio, purchases of securities classified as trading during ~~2018.~~the first quarter of 2019 primarily resulted in negative cash flows from operating activities that were largely offset by sales of securities classified as AFS within investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

See “Realized Gain (Loss)” in Note 5 for information on reinsurance related embedded derivatives.

9. Guaranteed Benefit Features

Information on the guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) features outstanding (dollars in millions) was as follows:



	As of		As of			As of		As of
	June 30,		December 31,			March 31,		December 31,
	2018 (1)			2017 (1)		2019 (1)			2018 (1)
Return of Net Deposits
Total account value	$	96,600		$	96,941	$	95,670		$	89,783
Net amount at risk (2)		126			81		209			1,002
Average attained age of contract holders		64 years			64 years		65 years			65 years

Minimum Return
Total account value	$	103		$	108	$	95		$	88
Net amount at risk (2)		16			18		16			18
Average attained age of contract holders		76 years			76 years		77 years			77 years
Guaranteed minimum return		5%			5%		5%			5%

Anniversary Contract Value
Total account value	$	26,046		$	26,596	$	25,031		$	23,365
Net amount at risk (2)		521			417		596			2,007
Average attained age of contract holders		70 years			70 years		71 years			71 years

⁽¹⁾

Our variable contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract; therefore, the amounts listed are not mutually exclusive.

⁽²⁾

Represents the amount of death benefit in excess of the account balance that is subject to market fluctuations.

The determination of GDB liabilities is based on models that involve a range of scenarios and assumptions, including those regarding expected market rates of return and volatility, contract surrender rates and mortality experience. The following summarizes the balances of and changes in the liabilities for GDBs (in millions), which were recorded in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:


	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	100		$	110		$	161		$	100
Changes in reserves		18			(2	)		(36	)		11
Benefits paid		(7	)		(11	)		(6	)		(3	)
Balance as of end-of-period	$	111		$	97		$	119		$	108

Variable Annuity Contracts

Account balances of variable annuity contracts, including those with guarantees, (in millions) were invested in separate account investment options as follows:



	As of			As of		As of			As of
	June 30,		December 31,			March 31,		December 31,
	2018			2017		2019			2018
Asset Type
Domestic equity	$	59,698		$	59,647	$	59,205		$	54,060
International equity		20,558			20,837		19,865			18,359
Fixed income		40,098			40,626		39,351			37,942
Total	$	120,354		$	121,110	$	118,421		$	110,361
Percent of total variable annuity
separate account values		99%			99%

Percent of total variable annuity separate account values							98%			99%

Secondary Guarantee Products

Future contract benefits and other contract holder funds include reserves for our secondary guarantee products sold through our Life Insurance segment. ~~These~~Reserves on UL and VUL products with secondary guarantees represented 37% and 35% of total life insurance in-force reserves as of ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018, respectively. UL and VUL products with secondary guarantees represented ~~30%~~29% and ~~33%~~35% of total life insurance sales for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~respectively, compared to 28% and 27% for the corresponding periods in 2017.~~

respectively.

2627

9.10. Liability for Unpaid Claims

~~In connection with~~The liability for unpaid claims consists primarily of long-term disability claims and are reported in future contract benefits on our ~~acquisition of the Liberty Group Business, we expanded our financial statement disclosures related to changes~~Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the liability for unpaid claims (in millions)~~, which~~ were as follows:



	For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	2,222		$	2,242		$	5,335		$	2,222
Reinsurance recoverable		57			69			143			57
Net balance as of beginning-of-year		2,165			2,173			5,192			2,165

Business acquired (1)		2,836			-

Incurred related to:
Current year		986			686			803			364
Prior years
Prior years:
Interest		50			37			41			19
All other incurred		(87	)		(45	)
All other incurred (1)								(85	)		(58	)
Total incurred		949			678			759			325

Paid related to:
Current year		(393	)		(343	)		(215	)		(126	)
Prior years		(517	)		(356	)		(482	)		(213	)
Total paid		(910	)		(699	)		(697	)		(339	)

Net balance as of end-of-period		5,040			2,152			5,254			2,151
Reinsurance recoverable		136			70			143			56
Balance as of end-of-period	$	5,176		$	2,222		$	5,397		$	2,207

⁽¹⁾

~~Represents Liberty group~~All other incurred is primarily impacted by the level of claim resolutions in the period compared to that which is expected by the reserve assumption. A negative number implies a favorable result where claim resolutions were more favorable than assumed. Our claim resolution rate assumption used in determining reserves is our expectation of the resolution rate we will experience over the long-term life of the block of claims. It will vary from actual experience in any one period, both favorably and ~~disability reserves, net, as of May 1, 2018, subject to finalization of acquisition date fair values. See Note 3 for additional information.~~unfavorably.

The ~~majority of the reserves included in the roll forward are for long-term disability claims. The~~ interest rate assumption used for discounting long-term claim reserves is an important part of the reserving process due to the long benefit period for these claims. Interest accrued on prior ~~year~~years’ reserves has been calculated on the opening reserve balance less one-half of the prior ~~year~~years’ incurred ~~period’s~~ claim payments at our average reserve discount ~~rate for the respective periods.~~rate.

~~“Incurred related~~Long-term disability benefits may extend for many years, and claim development schedules do not reflect these longer benefit periods. As a result, we use longer term retrospective runoff studies, experience studies and prospective studies to prior years - All other incurred” reflected in the preceding table is primarily impacted by the level of claim resolutions in the period compared to that which is expected by the reserve assumption. A negative number implies a favorable result where claim resolutions were more favorable than assumed. Our claim resolution rate assumption used in determining reserves isdevelop our ~~expectation of the resolution rate we will experience over the long-term life of the block of claims. It will vary from actual experience in any one period, both favorably and unfavorably.~~liability estimates.

~~A reconciliation of future contract benefits as reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets to the liability for unpaid claims (in millions), was as follows:~~

As of June 30,

2018

2017

Future contract benefits
$
33,718

$
22,293

Less:

Life and annuity reserves and claims due

26,975

18,411

Accident and health active life reserves

1,567

1,660

Liability for unpaid claims
$
5,176

$
2,222

11. Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

~~10. Contingencies~~Regulatory and ~~Commitments~~Litigation Matters

Regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, laws governing the activities of broker-dealers, registered investment ~~advisors~~advisers and unclaimed property laws.

LNC is involved in various pending or threatened legal or regulatory proceedings, including purported class actions, arising from the conduct of business both in the ordinary course and otherwise. In some of the matters, very large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding verdicts obtained in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This variability in pleadings, together with the actual experiences of LNC in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little relevance to its merits or disposition value.

Due to the unpredictable nature of litigation, the outcome of a litigation matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time is normally difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how trial and appellate courts will apply the law in the context of the pleadings or evidence presented, whether by motion practice, or at trial or on appeal. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel will themselves view the relevant evidence and applicable law.

We establish liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when information related to the loss contingencies shows both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. It is possible that some matters could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. While the potential future charges could be material in the particular quarterly or annual periods in which they are recorded, based on information currently known by management, management does not believe any such charges are likely to have a material adverse effect on LNC’s financial condition.

For some matters, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters in which a loss is probable, an accrual has been made. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made. Accordingly, the estimate contained in this paragraph reflects two types of matters. For some matters included within this estimate, an accrual has been made, but there is a reasonable possibility that an exposure exists in excess of the amount accrued. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of the accrued amount. For other matters included within this estimation, no accrual has been made because a loss, while potentially estimable, is believed to be reasonably possible but not probable. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, we estimate the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses to be up to approximately $50million.

For other matters, we are not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. We are often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts and the progress of settlement negotiations. On a quarterly and annual basis, we review relevant information with respect to litigation contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews.

Certain reinsurers have sought rate increases on certain yearly renewable term treaties. We are disputing the requested rate increases under these treaties. We have initiated and will initiate arbitration proceedings, as necessary, under these treaties in order to protect our contractual rights. Additionally, reinsurers may initiate arbitration proceedings against us. We believe it is unlikely the outcome of these disputes will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. ~~For more information about reinsurance, see Note 9~~ ~~in our 2017 Form 10-K~~.

~~Cost of Insurance Litigation~~Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

~~TVPX ARS INC., as Securities Intermediary for Consolidated Wealth Management, LTD.~~ v. The ~~Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in~~following provides the ~~U.S. District Court~~current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):



	As of March 31, 2019									As of December 31, 2018
	Commercial			Residential			Total			Commercial			Residential		Total
Current	$	13,598		$	401		$	13,999		$	13,029		$	239	$	13,268
60 to 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			1		1
Greater than 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			-		-
Valuation allowance		-			(1	)		(1	)		-			-		-
Unamortized premium (discount)		(16	)		13			(3	)		(17	)		8		(9	)
Total carrying value	$	13,582		$	415		$	13,997		$	13,012		$	248	$	13,260

We establish a valuation allowance to provide for the ~~Eastern District~~risk of ~~Pennsylvania, No. 2:18-cv-02989, is a putative class action that was filed on July 17, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that LNL charged more~~credit losses inherent in our portfolio. The valuation allowance includes specific valuation allowances for non-guaranteed cost of insurance than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all universal life and variable universal life policyholders who own policies issued by LNL or its predecessors containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisionsloans that are deemed to be impaired as well as general valuation allowances for pools of loans with similar ~~to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on behalf of all such policyholders. We are vigorously defending this matter.~~risk characteristics where a property risk or market specific risk has not been identified but for which we anticipate a loss has occurred.

~~See Note 13 in~~For our ~~2017 Form 10-K and Note 10 in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended~~commercial mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of March 31, ~~2018, for additional discussion of commitments and contingencies, which information is incorporated herein by reference.~~2019, or December 31, 2018.

2813

~~11. Shares and Stockholders’ Equity~~

~~Common Shares~~For our residential mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of March 31, 2019, or December 31, 2018. The general allowance established on residential mortgage loans as of March 31, 2019 was $1 million. As of December 31, 2018, the general allowance established on residential mortgage loans was less than $1 million.

The changes in ~~our common stock (number of shares)~~the valuation allowance associated with impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows:

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Common Stock

Balance as of beginning-of-period
218,695,476

224,888,259

218,090,114

226,335,105

Stock issued for exercise of warrants
2,826

289,636

22,866

334,930

Stock compensation/issued for benefit plans
51,644

89,455

636,966

1,461,286

Retirement/cancellation of shares
(1,455,895
)
(3,030,088
)
(1,455,895
)
(5,894,059
)
Balance as of end-of-period
217,294,051

222,237,262

217,294,051

222,237,262

Common Stock as of End-of-Period

Basic basis
217,294,051

222,237,262

217,294,051

222,237,262

Diluted basis
220,722,270

226,044,165

220,722,270

226,044,165



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	-	$	3
Additions		-		-
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		-		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	-	$	3

Additional information related to impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Average carrying value for impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate	$	-	$	8
Interest income recognized on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-
Interest income collected on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-

We use the loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our commercial mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
				Debt-				Debt-
				Service				Service
	Carrying		% of	Coverage	Carrying		% of	Coverage
Loan-to-Value Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio
Less than 65%	$	12,368	91.1%	2.27	$	11,716	90.1%	2.30
65% to 74%		1,175	8.6%	1.74		1,238	9.5%	1.76
75% to 100%		39	0.3%	1.20		58	0.4%	0.95
Total	$	13,582	100.0%		$	13,012	100.0%

We use loan performance status as the primary credit quality indicator for our residential mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019			As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		% of	Carrying		% of
Performance Indicator	Value		Total	Value		Total
Performing	$	414	99.5%	$	247	99.6%
Nonperforming		2	0.5%		1	0.4%
Total	$	416	100.0%	$	248	100.0%

Our ~~common stock~~commercial mortgage loan portfolio is ~~without par value.~~geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 23% of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and Texas, which accounted for 12% of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.

~~Average Shares~~

~~A reconciliation of~~Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the ~~denominator (number of shares)~~U.S. with the largest concentrations in ~~the calculations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share was as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Weighted-average shares, as used in basic calculation
217,997,297

223,555,299

218,182,118

224,581,848

Shares to cover exercise of outstanding warrants
639,071

694,403

640,929

858,916

Shares to cover non-vested stock
1,475,976

1,426,550

1,534,469

1,551,173

Average stock options outstanding during the period
1,752,403

2,339,558

1,860,997

2,510,344

Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed proceeds

from exercising outstanding warrants
(91,876
)
(105,156
)
(86,482
)
(127,696
)
Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed

proceeds and benefits from exercising stock

options (at average market price for the period)
(1,086,798
)
(1,464,321
)
(1,094,976
)
(1,541,738
)
Shares repurchasable from measured but

unrecognized stock option expense
(16,356
)
(59,959
)
(20,467
)
(68,519
)
Average deferred compensation shares
934,869

927,508

928,466

938,661

Weighted-average shares, as used in diluted calculation
221,604,586

227,313,882

221,945,054

228,702,989

In the event the average market price of LNC common stock exceeds the issue price of stock options and the options have a dilutive effect to our earnings per share (“EPS”), such options will be shown in the table above.

We have participants in our deferred compensation plans who selected LNC stock as the measure for the investment return attributable to all or a portion of their deferral amounts. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the effect of settling this obligation in LNC stock (“equity classification”) was more dilutive than the scenario of settling in cash (“liability classification”). Therefore, for our EPS calculation for these periods, we added these shares to the denominator and adjusted the numerator to present net income as if the shares had beenCalifornia, which accounted for ~~under equity classification by removing the mark-to-market adjustment included in net income attributable to these deferred units~~ 30% and 34%of ~~LNC stock. The amount~~residential mortgage loans on real estate as of ~~this adjustment was $8 million~~March 31, 2019, and ~~$10 million for the three and six months ended June 30,~~December 31, 2018, respectively, and ~~$(1) million~~Florida, which accounted for 19% of residential mortgage loans on real estate as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.

Alternative Investments

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, alternative investments included investments in 246 and 237 different partnerships, respectively, and the ~~three~~portfolio represented approximately 2% and ~~six months ended June 30, 2017,~~1% of our overall invested assets, respectively.

2914

~~AOCI~~

~~The following summarizes the components and changes in AOCI (in millions):~~

For the Six

Months Ended

June 30,

2018

2017

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on AFS Securities

Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
3,486

$
1,784

Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards

674

-

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

(4,891
)

2,058

Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment

(50
)

69

Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI, future contract benefits and other contract holder funds

1,395

(356
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

749

(626
)
Less:

Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)

(29
)

(13
)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

(10
)

(11
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

8

8

Balance as of end-of-period
$
1,394

$
2,945

Unrealized OTTI on AFS Securities

Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
44

$
25

(Increases) attributable to:

Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards

9

-

Gross OTTI recognized in OCI during the period

-

-

Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

-

-

Income tax benefit (expense)

-

-

Decreases attributable to:

Changes in fair value, sales, maturities or other settlements of AFS securities

(7
)

21

Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

(11
)

(4
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

4

(6
)
Balance as of end-of-period
$
39

$
36

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments

Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
(29
)
$
49

Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard

(6
)

-

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

87

46

Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment

50

(75
)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

4

(8
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

(29
)

13

Less:

Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)

11

7

Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

(1
)

(2
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

(2
)

(2
)
Balance as of end-of-period
$
69

$
22

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment

Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
(14
)
$
(27
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment arising during the period

(4
)

7

Balance as of end-of-period
$
(18
)
$
(20
)
Funded Status of Employee Benefit Plans

Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
(257
)
$
(265
)
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard

(35
)

-

Adjustment arising during the period

9

(7
)
Balance as of end-of-period
$
(283
)
$
(272
)

~~The following summarizes the reclassifications out of AOCI (in millions) and the associated line item in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):~~

For the Six

Months Ended

June 30,

2018

2017

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on AFS Securities

Gross reclassification
$
(29
)

$
(13
)
Total realized gain (loss)
Associated amortization of DAC,

VOBA, DSI and DFEL

(10
)

(11
)
Total realized gain (loss)
Reclassification before income

Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)

(39
)

(24
)
operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)

8

8

Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassification, net of income tax
$
(31
)

$
(16
)
Net income (loss)

Unrealized OTTI on AFS Securities

Gross reclassification
$
-

$
(1
)
Total realized gain (loss)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

-

-

Total realized gain (loss)
Reclassification before income

Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)

-

(1
)
operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)

-

-

Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassification, net of income tax
$
-

$
(1
)
Net income (loss)

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments

Gross reclassifications:

Interest rate contracts
$
2

$
2

Net investment income
Interest rate contracts

(2
)

(9
)
Interest and debt expense
Foreign currency contracts

11

9

Net investment income
Foreign currency contracts

-

5

Total realized gain (loss)
Total gross reclassifications

11

7

Associated amortization of DAC,

VOBA, DSI and DFEL

(1
)

(2
)
Commissions and other expenses
Reclassifications before income

Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)

10

5

operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)

(2
)

(2
)
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassifications, net of income tax
$
8

$
3

Net income (loss)

~~12.~~ Realized Gain (Loss)

Details underlying realized gain (loss) (in millions) reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:

					��
	For the Three						For the Six
	Months Ended						Months Ended						For the Three
	June 30,						June 30,						Months Ended
	2018			2017			2018			2017			March 31,
Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments (1)	$	(13	)	$	(18	)	$	(34	)	$	(31	)
													2019			2018
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Gross gains													$	12		$	14
Gross losses														(27	)		(30	)
Gross OTTI														(8	)		(2	)
Gain (loss) on other investments (1)														5			2
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
and changes in other contract holder funds														(2	)		(5	)
Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments														(20	)		(21	)
Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments (2)		23			(5	)		24			5			(121	)		1
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivatives results: (3)
Gross gain (loss)		(5	)		(7	)		(6	)		(17	)		(35	)		(1	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			2			-			1			1			-
Variable annuity net derivatives results: (4)
Gross gain (loss)		(11	)		23			22			(5	)		(215	)		33
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(5	)		(1	)		(2	)		28			-
Total realized gain (loss)	$	(7	)	$	(10	)	$	5		$	(49	)	$	(362	)	$	12

⁽¹⁾

~~See “Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Investments” section in Note 5.~~Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $6 million and less than $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

⁽²⁾

Represents changes in the fair values of certain derivative investments (not including those associated with our variable and indexed annuity and IUL contracts net ~~derivatives~~derivative results), reinsurance related embedded derivatives and trading securities. See Note 8 for information regarding modified coinsurance.

⁽³⁾

⁽⁴⁾

Includes the net difference in the change in embedded derivative reserves of our ~~GLB~~guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) riders and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge the change in embedded derivative reserves on our GLB riders and the benefit ratio unlocking on our GLB and GDB riders, including the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments.

~~13. Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans~~

~~We sponsor stock-based incentive compensation plans for our employees~~Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in net income (loss) and ~~directors~~included in realized gain (loss) on fixed maturity AFS securities above and ~~for~~ the ~~employees and agents~~portion of our subsidiaries that provide for the issuance of stock options, performance shares (performance-vested shares as opposed to service-vested shares), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and deferred stock units (“DSUs”). We issue new shares to satisfy option exercises and vested performance shares and RSUs.

~~LNC stock-based awards granted~~OTTI recognized in OCI (in millions) were as follows:

For the

For the

Three

Six

Months

Months

Ended

Ended

June 30,
June 30,

2018

2018

10-year LNC stock options

27,463

481,404

Performance shares

431

156,676

RSUs

103,769

694,269

Non-employee:

SARs

-

14,692

Agent stock options

-

32,400

Director DSUs

7,845

14,498



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	(6	)	$	(2	)
ABS		(1	)		-
RMBS		(1	)		-
Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss)		(8	)		(2	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			-
Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss)	$	(8	)	$	(2	)

Portion of OTTI Recognized in OCI
Gross OTTI recognized in OCI	$	16		$	-
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		-
Net portion of OTTI recognized in OCI	$	15		$	-

3215

~~14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments~~Payables for Collateral on Investments

The carrying ~~values~~value of the payables for collateral on investments included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and ~~estimated~~the fair ~~values~~value of ~~our financial instruments~~the related investments or collateral (in millions) ~~were as follows:~~

consisted of the following:

As of June 30, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

Carrying

Fair

Carrying

Fair

Value

Value

Value

Value

Assets

AFS securities:

Fixed maturity securities
$
93,060

$
93,060

$
94,840

$
94,840

Equity securities

-

-

246

246

Trading securities

1,450

1,450

1,620

1,620

Equity securities

112

112

-

-

Mortgage loans on real estate

12,217

12,060

10,762

10,877

Derivative investments (1)

584

584

915

915

Other investments

2,065

2,065

2,296

2,296

Cash and invested cash

1,775

1,775

1,628

1,628

Other assets:

GLB direct embedded derivatives

1,248

1,248

903

903

GLB ceded embedded derivatives

41

41

51

51

Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives

29

29

11

11

Separate account assets

144,231

144,231

144,219

144,219

Liabilities

Future contract benefits – indexed annuity

and IUL contracts embedded derivatives

(1,400
)

(1,400
)

(1,418
)

(1,418
)
Other contract holder funds:

Remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts

(578
)

(578
)

(592
)

(592
)
Account values of certain investment contracts

(32,962
)

(34,785
)

(32,370
)

(36,200
)
Short-term debt

-

-

(450
)

(452
)
Long-term debt

(5,826
)

(5,796
)

(4,894
)

(5,042
)
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives

(25
)

(25
)

(57
)

(57
)
Other liabilities:

Derivative liabilities (1)

(290
)

(290
)

(338
)

(338
)
GLB ceded embedded derivatives

(131
)

(131
)

(67
)

(67
)



	As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Collateral payable for derivative investments (1)	$	695	$	695	$	637	$	637
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements (2)		136		131		88		85
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements (3)		151		187		150		185
Investments pledged for Federal Home Loan Bank of
Indianapolis (“FHLBI”) (4)		4,380		6,570		3,930		5,923
Total payables for collateral on investments	$	5,362	$	7,583	$	4,805	$	6,830

⁽¹⁾

We ~~have master netting~~obtain collateral based upon contractual provisions with our counterparties. These agreements take into consideration the counterparties’ credit rating as compared to ours, the fair value of the derivative investments and specified thresholds that if exceeded result in the receipt of cash that is typically invested in cash and invested cash. See Note 6 for additional information.

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Our pledged securities under repurchase agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 80% to 95% of the fair value of the securities, and our agreements with ~~each of our derivative counterparties, which~~third parties contain contractual provisions to allow for additional collateral to be obtained when necessary. The cash received in our repurchase program is typically invested in fixed maturity AFS securities.

⁽⁴⁾

Our pledged investments for FHLBI are included in fixed maturity AFS securities and mortgage loans on real estate on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 105% to 115% of the ~~netting~~fair value for fixed maturity AFS securities and 155% to 175% of ~~our derivative asset~~the fair value for mortgage loans on real estate. The cash received in these transactions is primarily invested in cash and ~~liability positions by counterparty.~~invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.

~~Valuation Methodologies~~Increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments (in millions) consisted of the following:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Collateral payable for derivative investments	$	58	$	(83	)
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements		48		(68	)
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements		1		(1	)
Investments pledged for FHLBI		450		-
Total increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments	$	557	$	(152	)

We have elected not to offset our repurchase agreements and ~~Associated Inputs~~securities lending transactions in our financial statements. The remaining contractual maturities of repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions accounted for ~~Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value~~as secured borrowings (in millions) were as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	151
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		136		-		-		-		136
Total gross secured borrowings	$	136	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	287


	As of December 31, 2018
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	150
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		88		-		-		-		88
Total gross secured borrowings	$	88	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	238

We accept collateral in the form of securities in connection with repurchase agreements. In instances where we are permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received, we report the fair value of the collateral received and a related obligation to return the collateral in the financial statements. In addition, we receive securities in connection with securities borrowing agreements which we are permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of March 31, 2019, the fair value of all collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge was $548 million. As of March 31, 2019, we have re-pledged $536 million of this collateral to cover initial margin and over-the-counter collateral requirements on certain derivative investments.

Investment Commitments

As of March 31, 2019, our investment commitments were $2.0 billion, which included $823 million of LPs, $669 million of mortgage loans on real estate and $528 million of private placement securities.

Concentrations of Financial Instruments

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, our most significant investments in one issuer were our investments in securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation with a fair value of $1.4 billion or 1% of our invested assets portfolio, and our investments in securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association with a fair value of $1.3 billion or 1% of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.

As of March 31, 2019, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the financial services industry and the consumer non-cyclical industry with a fair value of $15.3 billion and $15.1 billion, respectively, or 13% and 12%, respectively, of our invested assets portfolio. As of December 31, 2018, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the consumer non-cyclical industry and the financial services industry with a fair value of $14.5 billion and $14.2 billion, respectively, or 13% and 12% of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.

6. Derivative Instruments

We maintain an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk and credit risk. We assess these risks by continually identifying and monitoring changes in our exposures that may adversely affect expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.

Derivative activities are monitored by various management committees. The ~~following discussion outlines~~committees are responsible for overseeing the ~~methodologies~~implementation of various hedging strategies that are developed through the analysis of financial simulation models and ~~assumptions used~~other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are incorporated into our overall risk management strategies.

See Note 13 for additional disclosures related to ~~determine~~ the fair value of our ~~financial~~derivative instruments ~~not carried~~and Note 4 for derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIEs.

We adopted ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, in 2019. See Note 2 for additional information.

Interest Rate Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps

We also use forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure within our life products related to the forecasted purchases of certain assets.

Interest Rate Cap Corridors

Interest Rate Futures

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

We also use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate risk of floating-rate bond coupon payments by replicating a fixed-rate bond.

Treasury and Reverse Treasury Locks

Foreign Currency Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our foreign currency risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Currency Futures

Foreign Currency Swaps

Equity Market Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our equity market risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Call Options Based on the S&P 500

We use call options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Consumer Price Index Swaps

Equity Futures

We use equity futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures contracts

require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.

Put Options

Total Return Swaps

We use total return swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Variance Swaps

Credit Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our credit risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Credit Default Swaps – Buying Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Credit Default Swaps – Selling Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Embedded Derivatives

We have embedded derivatives that include:

GLB Reserves Embedded Derivatives

divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments and our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.

Indexed Annuity and IUL Contracts Embedded Derivatives

Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component, where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500. Contract holders may elect to rebalance index options at renewal dates, either annually or biannually. As of each renewal date, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase S&P 500 call options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period.

Reinsurance Related Embedded Derivatives



	As of March 31, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
	Notional		Fair Value				Notional		Fair Value
	Amounts		Asset		Liability		Amounts		Asset		Liability
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	2,567	$	64	$	51	$	2,741	$	70	$	9
Foreign currency contracts (1)		2,442		153		36		2,326		167		39
Total cash flow hedges		5,009		217		87		5,067		237		48
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		1,261		80		163		1,268		55		137
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (1)		95,308		588		105		100,628		464		138
Foreign currency contracts (1)		11		-		-		47		-		-
Equity market contracts (1)		32,795		613		404		30,487		676		162
Credit contracts (1)		60		-		-		-		-		-
Embedded derivatives:
GLB direct (2)		-		439		-		-		123		-
GLB ceded (2) (3)		-		50		8		-		72		-
Reinsurance related (4)		-		-		177		-		-		3
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (2) (5)		-		872		1,730		-		902		1,305
Total derivative instruments	$	134,444	$	2,859	$	2,674	$	137,497	$	2,529	$	1,793

⁽¹⁾

Reported in derivative investments and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽²⁾

Reported in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽³⁾

Reported in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in reinsurance related embedded derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁵⁾

Reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments (in millions) was as follows:



	Remaining Life as of March 31, 2019
	Less Than		1 - 5		6 - 10		11 - 30		Over 30
	1 Year		Years		Years		Years		Years		Total
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	11,465	$	9,727	$	51,648	$	24,583	$	1,713	$	99,136
Foreign currency contracts (2)		66		264		764		1,278		81		2,453
Equity market contracts		22,440		5,198		1,996		13		3,148		32,795
Credit contracts		-		-		60		-		-		60
Total derivative instruments
with notional amounts	$	33,971	$	15,189	$	54,468	$	25,874	$	4,942	$	134,444

⁽¹⁾

As of March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was April 2067.

⁽²⁾

As of March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was September 2049.

The following amounts (in millions) were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:


	As of March 31, 2019

				Cumulative
				Fair Value Hedging
				Adjustment Included
	Amortized Cost			in the Amortized
	of the Hedged			Cost of the Hedged
	Assets (Liabilities)			Assets (Liabilities)
Line Items in which the Hedged Items are Recorded
Fixed maturity AFS securities, at fair value	$	457		$	161
Long-term debt (1)		(976	)		(101	)

⁽¹⁾

The balance includes $(122) million of unamortized adjustments from discontinued hedges as of March 31, 2019.

The change in our unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	139		$	(29	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period:
Cumulative effect from adoption of
new accounting standard		-			(6	)
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts		(47	)		53
Foreign currency contracts		11			(37	)
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment		(14	)		(50	)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		6			4
Income tax benefit (expense)		10			7
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses)
included in net income (loss):
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		1			1
Interest rate contracts (2)		(1	)		(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)		7			5
Foreign currency contracts (3)		1			-
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(1	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	99		$	(60	)

⁽¹⁾

The OCI offset is reported within net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

The OCI offset is reported within interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

The OCI offset is reported within realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The effects of qualifying and non-qualifying hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



		Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
		Realized			Net		Commissions			Interest
		Gain			Investment			and Other		and Debt
		(Loss)			Income			Expenses		Expense
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value
or Cash Flow Hedges are Recorded	$	(362	)	$	1,251		$	1,176	$	71

Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items		-			24			-		(34	)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments		-			(24	)		-		34
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		-			1			-		(1	)
Foreign currency contracts
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		1			7			-		-

Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts		357			-			-		-
Equity market contracts		(458	)		-			-		-
Embedded derivatives:
GLB		286			-			-		-
Reinsurance related		(174	)		-			-		-
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts		(239	)		-			-		-

The gains (losses) on derivative instruments (in millions) recorded within income (loss) from continuing operations on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2018
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		$	1
Interest rate contracts (2)			(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)			5
Total cash flow hedges			3
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)			(4	)
Interest rate contracts (2)			6
Interest rate contracts (3)			33
Total fair value hedges			35
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (3)			(314	)
Foreign currency contracts (3)			2
Equity market contracts (3)			7
Equity market contracts (4)			(2	)
Embedded derivatives:
GLB (3)			157
Reinsurance related (3)			23
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (3)			52
Total derivative instruments		$	(37	)

⁽¹⁾

Reported in net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

Reported in interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

Reported in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Gains (losses) recognized as a component of OCI (in millions) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2018
Offset to net investment income		$	6
Offset to interest and debt expense			(3	)

As of March 31, 2019, $35 million of the deferred net gains (losses) on derivative instruments in AOCI were expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would be due primarily to interest rate variances related to our interest rate swap agreements.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no material reclassifications to earnings due to hedged firm commitments no longer deemed probable or due to hedged forecasted transactions that had not occurred by the end of the originally specified time period.

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we did not have any exposure related to credit default swaps for which we are the seller.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on various derivative contracts and reflect assumptions regarding the credit or non-performance risk (“NPR”). The NPR is based upon assumptions for each counterparty’s credit spread over the estimated weighted average life of the counterparty exposure less collateral held. As of March 31, 2019, the NPR adjustment was zero. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by entering into agreements with financial institutions with long-standing, superior performance records. Additionally, we maintain a policy of requiring derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement. We are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, our insurance subsidiaries have agreed to maintain certain financial strength or claims-paying ratings. A downgrade below these levels could result in termination of derivative contracts, at which time any amounts payable by us would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contracts. In certain transactions, we and the counterparty have entered into a credit support annex requiring either party to post collateral when net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. The amount of such exposure is essentially the net replacement cost or market value less collateral held for such agreements with each counterparty if the net market value is in our favor. As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, our exposure was zero.

The amounts recognized (in millions) by S&P credit rating of counterparty, for which we had the right to reclaim cash collateral or were obligated to return cash collateral, were as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019					As of December 31, 2018
	Collateral		Collateral			Collateral		Collateral
	Posted by		Posted by			Posted by		Posted by
S&P	Counter-		LNC			Counter-		LNC
Credit	Party		(Held by			Party		(Held by
Rating of	(Held by		Counter-			(Held by		Counter-
Counterparty	LNC)		Party)			LNC)		Party)
AA-	$	56	$	(3	)	$	33	$	(3	)
A+		389		(281	)		296		(96	)
A		5		-			106		(56	)
A-		244		(1	)		4		-
BBB+		-		-			197		-
	$	694	$	(285	)	$	636	$	(155	)

Balance Sheet Offsetting

Information related to the effects of offsetting (in millions) was as follows:



		As of March 31, 2019
					Embedded
	Derivative				Derivative
	Instruments				Instruments			Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	1,350			$	1,361	$	2,711
Gross amounts offset			(369	)			-		(369	)
Net amount of assets			981				1,361		2,342
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(694	)			-		(694	)
Non-cash collateral			(116	)			-		(116	)
Net amount		$	171			$	1,361	$	1,532

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	910			$	1,915	$	2,825
Gross amounts offset			(148	)			-		(148	)
Net amount of liabilities			762				1,915		2,677
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(285	)			-		(285	)
Non-cash collateral			(346	)			-		(346	)
Net amount		$	131			$	1,915	$	2,046


		As of December 31, 2018
					Embedded
	Derivative				Derivative
	Instruments				Instruments			Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	1,330			$	1,097	$	2,427
Gross amounts offset			(223	)			-		(223	)
Net amount of assets			1,107				1,097		2,204
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(636	)			-		(636	)
Non-cash collateral			(58	)			-		(58	)
Net amount		$	413			$	1,097	$	1,510

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	784			$	1,308	$	2,092
Gross amounts offset			(103	)			-		(103	)
Net amount of liabilities			681				1,308		1,989
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(155	)			-		(155	)
Non-cash collateral			(190	)			-		(190	)
Net amount		$	336			$	1,308	$	1,644

7. Federal Income Taxes

The effective tax rate is the ratio of tax expense over pre-tax income (loss). The effective tax rate was 6% and 16% for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The effective tax rate on pre-tax income was lower than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 21%. Differences between the effective rates and the corporate federal income tax rate were primarily the result of the separate account dividends-received deduction, certain tax preferred investment income, foreign tax credits and other tax preference items. The current quarter’s effective tax rate is lower than the comparable quarter in the prior year primarily as a result of an increased level of realized losses and the associated tax benefit resulting from the application of the corporate federal income tax rate of 21%.

8. Reinsurance

Modified Coinsurance Reinsurance Transaction

In repositioning the Modco investment portfolio, purchases of securities classified as trading during the first quarter of 2019 primarily resulted in negative cash flows from operating activities that were largely offset by sales of securities classified as AFS within investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

See “Realized Gain (Loss)” in Note 5 for information on reinsurance related embedded derivatives.

9. Guaranteed Benefit Features

Information on the guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) features outstanding (dollars in millions) was as follows:


	As of		As of
	March 31,		December 31,
	2019 (1)			2018 (1)
Return of Net Deposits
Total account value	$	95,670		$	89,783
Net amount at risk (2)		209			1,002
Average attained age of contract holders		65 years			65 years

Minimum Return
Total account value	$	95		$	88
Net amount at risk (2)		16			18
Average attained age of contract holders		77 years			77 years
Guaranteed minimum return		5%			5%

Anniversary Contract Value
Total account value	$	25,031		$	23,365
Net amount at risk (2)		596			2,007
Average attained age of contract holders		71 years			71 years

⁽¹⁾

Our variable contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract; therefore, the amounts listed are not mutually exclusive.

⁽²⁾

Represents the amount of death benefit in excess of the account balance that is subject to market fluctuations.


	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	161		$	100
Changes in reserves		(36	)		11
Benefits paid		(6	)		(3	)
Balance as of end-of-period	$	119		$	108

Variable Annuity Contracts

Account balances of variable annuity contracts, including those with guarantees, (in millions) were invested in separate account investment options as follows:


	As of			As of
	March 31,		December 31,
	2019			2018
Asset Type
Domestic equity	$	59,205		$	54,060
International equity		19,865			18,359
Fixed income		39,351			37,942
Total	$	118,421		$	110,361

Percent of total variable annuity separate account values		98%			99%

Secondary Guarantee Products

Future contract benefits and other contract holder funds include reserves for our secondary guarantee products sold through our Life Insurance segment. Reserves on UL and VUL products with secondary guarantees represented 37% and 35% of total life insurance in-force reserves as of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. UL and VUL products with secondary guarantees represented 29% and 35% of total life insurance sales for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

10. Liability for Unpaid Claims

The liability for unpaid claims consists primarily of long-term disability claims and are reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. ~~Considerable judgment~~Changes in the liability for unpaid claims (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	5,335		$	2,222
Reinsurance recoverable		143			57
Net balance as of beginning-of-year		5,192			2,165
Incurred related to:
Current year		803			364
Prior years:
Interest		41			19
All other incurred (1)		(85	)		(58	)
Total incurred		759			325
Paid related to:
Current year		(215	)		(126	)
Prior years		(482	)		(213	)
Total paid		(697	)		(339	)
Net balance as of end-of-period		5,254			2,151
Reinsurance recoverable		143			56
Balance as of end-of-period	$	5,397		$	2,207

⁽¹⁾

All other incurred is primarily impacted by the level of claim resolutions in the period compared to that which is expected by the reserve assumption. A negative number implies a favorable result where claim resolutions were more favorable than assumed. Our claim resolution rate assumption used in determining reserves is our expectation of the resolution rate we will experience over the long-term life of the block of claims. It will vary from actual experience in any one period, both favorably and unfavorably.

The interest rate assumption used for discounting long-term claim reserves is ~~required~~an important part of the reserving process due to the long benefit period for these claims. Interest accrued on prior years’ reserves has been calculated on the opening reserve balance less one-half of the prior years’ incurred claim payments at our average reserve discount rate.

Long-term disability benefits may extend for many years, and claim development schedules do not reflect these longer benefit periods. As a result, we use longer term retrospective runoff studies, experience studies and prospective studies to develop ~~these assumptions used~~our liability estimates.

11. Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

Regulatory and Litigation Matters

LNC is involved in various pending or threatened legal or regulatory proceedings, including purported class actions, arising from the conduct of business both in the ordinary course and otherwise. In some of the matters, very large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to ~~measure fair~~specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding verdicts obtained in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This variability in pleadings, together with the actual experiences of LNC in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little relevance to its merits or disposition value.

We establish liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when information related to the loss contingencies shows both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. It is possible that some matters could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated as of March 31, 2019. While the potential future charges could be material in the particular quarterly or annual periods in which they are recorded, based on information currently known by management, management does not believe any such charges are likely to have a material adverse effect on LNC’s financial condition.

For some matters, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters in which a loss is probable, an accrual has been made. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made. Accordingly, the ~~estimates shown~~estimate contained in this paragraph reflects two types of matters. For some matters included within this estimate, an accrual has been made, but there is a reasonable possibility that an exposure exists in excess of the amount accrued. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of the accrued amount. For other matters included within this estimation, no accrual has been made because a loss, while potentially estimable, is believed to be reasonably possible but not probable. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. As of March 31, 2019, we estimate the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses to be up to approximately $50 million.

For other matters, we are not ~~necessarily indicative~~currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. We are often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the ~~amounts that would be realized~~range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts and the progress of settlement negotiations. On a quarterly and annual basis, we review relevant information with respect to litigation contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews.

Certain reinsurers have sought rate increases on certain yearly renewable term treaties. We are disputing the requested rate increases under these treaties. We have initiated and will initiate arbitration proceedings, as necessary, under these treaties in order to protect our contractual rights. Additionally, reinsurers may initiate arbitration proceedings against us. We believe it is unlikely the outcome of these disputes will have a ~~one-time, current market exchange of all of~~material adverse effect on our financial ~~instruments.~~condition.

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

The following provides the current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):



	As of March 31, 2019									As of December 31, 2018
	Commercial			Residential			Total			Commercial			Residential		Total
Current	$	13,598		$	401		$	13,999		$	13,029		$	239	$	13,268
60 to 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			1		1
Greater than 90 days past due		-			1			1			-			-		-
Valuation allowance		-			(1	)		(1	)		-			-		-
Unamortized premium (discount)		(16	)		13			(3	)		(17	)		8		(9	)
Total carrying value	$	13,582		$	415		$	13,997		$	13,012		$	248	$	13,260

For our commercial mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of March 31, 2019, or December 31, 2018.

The changes in the valuation allowance associated with impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	-	$	3
Additions		-		-
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		-		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	-	$	3

Additional information related to impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Average carrying value for impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate	$	-	$	8
Interest income recognized on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-
Interest income collected on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate		-		-

We use the loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our commercial mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
				Debt-				Debt-
				Service				Service
	Carrying		% of	Coverage	Carrying		% of	Coverage
Loan-to-Value Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio	Value		Total	Ratio
Less than 65%	$	12,368	91.1%	2.27	$	11,716	90.1%	2.30
65% to 74%		1,175	8.6%	1.74		1,238	9.5%	1.76
75% to 100%		39	0.3%	1.20		58	0.4%	0.95
Total	$	13,582	100.0%		$	13,012	100.0%

We use loan performance status as the primary credit quality indicator for our residential mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019			As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		% of	Carrying		% of
Performance Indicator	Value		Total	Value		Total
Performing	$	414	99.5%	$	247	99.6%
Nonperforming		2	0.5%		1	0.4%
Total	$	416	100.0%	$	248	100.0%

Alternative Investments

Realized Gain (Loss)

Details underlying realized gain (loss) (in millions) reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Gross gains	$	12		$	14
Gross losses		(27	)		(30	)
Gross OTTI		(8	)		(2	)
Gain (loss) on other investments (1)		5			2
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
and changes in other contract holder funds		(2	)		(5	)
Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments		(20	)		(21	)
Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments (2)		(121	)		1
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivatives results: (3)
Gross gain (loss)		(35	)		(1	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		1			-
Variable annuity net derivatives results: (4)
Gross gain (loss)		(215	)		33
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		28			-
Total realized gain (loss)	$	(362	)	$	12

⁽¹⁾

Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $6 million and less than $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

⁽⁴⁾



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	(6	)	$	(2	)
ABS		(1	)		-
RMBS		(1	)		-
Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss)		(8	)		(2	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			-
Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss)	$	(8	)	$	(2	)

Portion of OTTI Recognized in OCI
Gross OTTI recognized in OCI	$	16		$	-
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		-
Net portion of OTTI recognized in OCI	$	15		$	-

Payables for Collateral on Investments

The carrying value of the payables for collateral on investments included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the fair value of the related investments or collateral (in millions) consisted of the following:



	As of March 31, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Collateral payable for derivative investments (1)	$	695	$	695	$	637	$	637
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements (2)		136		131		88		85
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements (3)		151		187		150		185
Investments pledged for Federal Home Loan Bank of
Indianapolis (“FHLBI”) (4)		4,380		6,570		3,930		5,923
Total payables for collateral on investments	$	5,362	$	7,583	$	4,805	$	6,830

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Our pledged securities under repurchase agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 80% to 95% of the fair value of the securities, and our agreements with third parties contain contractual provisions to allow for additional collateral to be obtained when necessary. The cash received in our repurchase program is typically invested in fixed maturity AFS securities.

⁽⁴⁾

Increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments (in millions) consisted of the following:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Collateral payable for derivative investments	$	58	$	(83	)
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements		48		(68	)
Securities pledged under repurchase agreements		1		(1	)
Investments pledged for FHLBI		450		-
Total increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments	$	557	$	(152	)



	As of March 31, 2019
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	151
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		136		-		-		-		136
Total gross secured borrowings	$	136	$	-	$	-	$	151	$	287


	As of December 31, 2018
	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		30 - 90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total
Repurchase Agreements
Corporate bonds	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	150
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds		88		-		-		-		88
Total gross secured borrowings	$	88	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	238

We accept collateral in the form of securities in connection with repurchase agreements. In instances where we are permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received, we report the fair value of the collateral received and a related obligation to return the collateral in the financial statements. In addition, we receive securities in connection with securities borrowing agreements which we are permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of March 31, 2019, the fair value of all collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge was $548 million. As of March 31, 2019, we have re-pledged $536 million of this collateral to cover initial margin and over-the-counter collateral requirements on certain derivative investments.

Investment Commitments

As of March 31, 2019, our investment commitments were $2.0 billion, which included $823 million of LPs, $669 million of mortgage loans on real estate and $528 million of private placement securities.

Concentrations of Financial Instruments

6. Derivative Instruments

We maintain an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk and credit risk. We assess these risks by continually identifying and monitoring changes in our exposures that may adversely affect expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.

Derivative activities are monitored by various management committees. The committees are responsible for overseeing the implementation of various hedging strategies that are developed through the analysis of financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are incorporated into our overall risk management strategies.

See Note 13 for additional disclosures related to the fair value of our derivative instruments and Note 4 for derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIEs.

We adopted ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, in 2019. See Note 2 for additional information.

Interest Rate Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps

We also use forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure within our life products related to the forecasted purchases of certain assets.

Interest Rate Cap Corridors

Interest Rate Futures

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

We also use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate risk of floating-rate bond coupon payments by replicating a fixed-rate bond.

Treasury and Reverse Treasury Locks

Foreign Currency Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our foreign currency risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless otherwise noted and include:

Currency Futures

Foreign Currency Swaps

Equity Market Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our equity market risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Call Options Based on the S&P 500

We use call options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Consumer Price Index Swaps

Equity Futures

We use equity futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures contracts

require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.

Put Options

Total Return Swaps

We use total return swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Variance Swaps

Credit Contracts

We use derivative instruments as part of our credit risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:

Credit Default Swaps – Buying Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Credit Default Swaps – Selling Protection

We use credit default swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.

Embedded Derivatives

We have embedded derivatives that include:

GLB Reserves Embedded Derivatives

divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments and our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.

Indexed Annuity and IUL Contracts Embedded Derivatives

Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component, where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500. Contract holders may elect to rebalance index options at renewal dates, either annually or biannually. As of each renewal date, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase S&P 500 call options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period.

Reinsurance Related Embedded Derivatives



	As of March 31, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
	Notional		Fair Value				Notional		Fair Value
	Amounts		Asset		Liability		Amounts		Asset		Liability
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	2,567	$	64	$	51	$	2,741	$	70	$	9
Foreign currency contracts (1)		2,442		153		36		2,326		167		39
Total cash flow hedges		5,009		217		87		5,067		237		48
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		1,261		80		163		1,268		55		137
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (1)		95,308		588		105		100,628		464		138
Foreign currency contracts (1)		11		-		-		47		-		-
Equity market contracts (1)		32,795		613		404		30,487		676		162
Credit contracts (1)		60		-		-		-		-		-
Embedded derivatives:
GLB direct (2)		-		439		-		-		123		-
GLB ceded (2) (3)		-		50		8		-		72		-
Reinsurance related (4)		-		-		177		-		-		3
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (2) (5)		-		872		1,730		-		902		1,305
Total derivative instruments	$	134,444	$	2,859	$	2,674	$	137,497	$	2,529	$	1,793

⁽¹⁾

Reported in derivative investments and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽²⁾

Reported in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽³⁾

Reported in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in reinsurance related embedded derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁵⁾

Reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments (in millions) was as follows:



	Remaining Life as of March 31, 2019
	Less Than		1 - 5		6 - 10		11 - 30		Over 30
	1 Year		Years		Years		Years		Years		Total
Interest rate contracts (1)	$	11,465	$	9,727	$	51,648	$	24,583	$	1,713	$	99,136
Foreign currency contracts (2)		66		264		764		1,278		81		2,453
Equity market contracts		22,440		5,198		1,996		13		3,148		32,795
Credit contracts		-		-		60		-		-		60
Total derivative instruments
with notional amounts	$	33,971	$	15,189	$	54,468	$	25,874	$	4,942	$	134,444

⁽¹⁾

As of March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was April 2067.

⁽²⁾

As of March 31, 2019, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was September 2049.

The following amounts (in millions) were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:


	As of March 31, 2019

				Cumulative
				Fair Value Hedging
				Adjustment Included
	Amortized Cost			in the Amortized
	of the Hedged			Cost of the Hedged
	Assets (Liabilities)			Assets (Liabilities)
Line Items in which the Hedged Items are Recorded
Fixed maturity AFS securities, at fair value	$	457		$	161
Long-term debt (1)		(976	)		(101	)

⁽¹⁾

The balance includes $(122) million of unamortized adjustments from discontinued hedges as of March 31, 2019.

The change in our unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	139		$	(29	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period:
Cumulative effect from adoption of
new accounting standard		-			(6	)
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts		(47	)		53
Foreign currency contracts		11			(37	)
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment		(14	)		(50	)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		6			4
Income tax benefit (expense)		10			7
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses)
included in net income (loss):
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		1			1
Interest rate contracts (2)		(1	)		(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)		7			5
Foreign currency contracts (3)		1			-
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(1	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	99		$	(60	)

⁽¹⁾

The OCI offset is reported within net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

The OCI offset is reported within interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

The OCI offset is reported within realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The effects of qualifying and non-qualifying hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



		Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
		Realized			Net		Commissions			Interest
		Gain			Investment			and Other		and Debt
		(Loss)			Income			Expenses		Expense
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value
or Cash Flow Hedges are Recorded	$	(362	)	$	1,251		$	1,176	$	71

Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items		-			24			-		(34	)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments		-			(24	)		-		34
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		-			1			-		(1	)
Foreign currency contracts
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income		1			7			-		-

Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts		357			-			-		-
Equity market contracts		(458	)		-			-		-
Embedded derivatives:
GLB		286			-			-		-
Reinsurance related		(174	)		-			-		-
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts		(239	)		-			-		-

The gains (losses) on derivative instruments (in millions) recorded within income (loss) from continuing operations on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2018
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)		$	1
Interest rate contracts (2)			(3	)
Foreign currency contracts (1)			5
Total cash flow hedges			3
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)			(4	)
Interest rate contracts (2)			6
Interest rate contracts (3)			33
Total fair value hedges			35
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (3)			(314	)
Foreign currency contracts (3)			2
Equity market contracts (3)			7
Equity market contracts (4)			(2	)
Embedded derivatives:
GLB (3)			157
Reinsurance related (3)			23
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts (3)			52
Total derivative instruments		$	(37	)

⁽¹⁾

Reported in net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

Reported in interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽³⁾

Reported in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽⁴⁾

Reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Gains (losses) recognized as a component of OCI (in millions) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2018
Offset to net investment income		$	6
Offset to interest and debt expense			(3	)

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we did not have any exposure related to credit default swaps for which we are the seller.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on various derivative contracts and reflect assumptions regarding the credit or non-performance risk (“NPR”). The NPR is based upon assumptions for each counterparty’s credit spread over the estimated weighted average life of the counterparty exposure less collateral held. As of March 31, 2019, the NPR adjustment was zero. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by entering into agreements with financial institutions with long-standing, superior performance records. Additionally, we maintain a policy of requiring derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement. We are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, our insurance subsidiaries have agreed to maintain certain financial strength or claims-paying ratings. A downgrade below these levels could result in termination of derivative contracts, at which time any amounts payable by us would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contracts. In certain transactions, we and the counterparty have entered into a credit support annex requiring either party to post collateral when net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. The amount of such exposure is essentially the net replacement cost or market value less collateral held for such agreements with each counterparty if the net market value is in our favor. As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, our exposure was zero.

The amounts recognized (in millions) by S&P credit rating of counterparty, for which we had the right to reclaim cash collateral or were obligated to return cash collateral, were as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019					As of December 31, 2018
	Collateral		Collateral			Collateral		Collateral
	Posted by		Posted by			Posted by		Posted by
S&P	Counter-		LNC			Counter-		LNC
Credit	Party		(Held by			Party		(Held by
Rating of	(Held by		Counter-			(Held by		Counter-
Counterparty	LNC)		Party)			LNC)		Party)
AA-	$	56	$	(3	)	$	33	$	(3	)
A+		389		(281	)		296		(96	)
A		5		-			106		(56	)
A-		244		(1	)		4		-
BBB+		-		-			197		-
	$	694	$	(285	)	$	636	$	(155	)

Balance Sheet Offsetting

Information related to the effects of offsetting (in millions) was as follows:



		As of March 31, 2019
					Embedded
	Derivative				Derivative
	Instruments				Instruments			Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	1,350			$	1,361	$	2,711
Gross amounts offset			(369	)			-		(369	)
Net amount of assets			981				1,361		2,342
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(694	)			-		(694	)
Non-cash collateral			(116	)			-		(116	)
Net amount		$	171			$	1,361	$	1,532

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	910			$	1,915	$	2,825
Gross amounts offset			(148	)			-		(148	)
Net amount of liabilities			762				1,915		2,677
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(285	)			-		(285	)
Non-cash collateral			(346	)			-		(346	)
Net amount		$	131			$	1,915	$	2,046


		As of December 31, 2018
					Embedded
	Derivative				Derivative
	Instruments				Instruments			Total

Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets		$	1,330			$	1,097	$	2,427
Gross amounts offset			(223	)			-		(223	)
Net amount of assets			1,107				1,097		2,204
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(636	)			-		(636	)
Non-cash collateral			(58	)			-		(58	)
Net amount		$	413			$	1,097	$	1,510

Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities		$	784			$	1,308	$	2,092
Gross amounts offset			(103	)			-		(103	)
Net amount of liabilities			681				1,308		1,989
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral			(155	)			-		(155	)
Non-cash collateral			(190	)			-		(190	)
Net amount		$	336			$	1,308	$	1,644

7. Federal Income Taxes

8. Reinsurance

Modified Coinsurance Reinsurance Transaction

See “Realized Gain (Loss)” in Note 5 for information on reinsurance related embedded derivatives.

9. Guaranteed Benefit Features

Information on the guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) features outstanding (dollars in millions) was as follows:


	As of		As of
	March 31,		December 31,
	2019 (1)			2018 (1)
Return of Net Deposits
Total account value	$	95,670		$	89,783
Net amount at risk (2)		209			1,002
Average attained age of contract holders		65 years			65 years

Minimum Return
Total account value	$	95		$	88
Net amount at risk (2)		16			18
Average attained age of contract holders		77 years			77 years
Guaranteed minimum return		5%			5%

Anniversary Contract Value
Total account value	$	25,031		$	23,365
Net amount at risk (2)		596			2,007
Average attained age of contract holders		71 years			71 years

⁽¹⁾

Our variable contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract; therefore, the amounts listed are not mutually exclusive.

⁽²⁾

Represents the amount of death benefit in excess of the account balance that is subject to market fluctuations.


	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	161		$	100
Changes in reserves		(36	)		11
Benefits paid		(6	)		(3	)
Balance as of end-of-period	$	119		$	108

Variable Annuity Contracts

Account balances of variable annuity contracts, including those with guarantees, (in millions) were invested in separate account investment options as follows:


	As of			As of
	March 31,		December 31,
	2019			2018
Asset Type
Domestic equity	$	59,205		$	54,060
International equity		19,865			18,359
Fixed income		39,351			37,942
Total	$	118,421		$	110,361

Percent of total variable annuity separate account values		98%			99%

Secondary Guarantee Products

10. Liability for Unpaid Claims

The liability for unpaid claims consists primarily of long-term disability claims and are reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the liability for unpaid claims (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	5,335		$	2,222
Reinsurance recoverable		143			57
Net balance as of beginning-of-year		5,192			2,165
Incurred related to:
Current year		803			364
Prior years:
Interest		41			19
All other incurred (1)		(85	)		(58	)
Total incurred		759			325
Paid related to:
Current year		(215	)		(126	)
Prior years		(482	)		(213	)
Total paid		(697	)		(339	)
Net balance as of end-of-period		5,254			2,151
Reinsurance recoverable		143			56
Balance as of end-of-period	$	5,397		$	2,207

⁽¹⁾

The interest rate assumption used for discounting long-term claim reserves is an important part of the reserving process due to the long benefit period for these claims. Interest accrued on prior years’ reserves has been calculated on the opening reserve balance less one-half of the prior years’ incurred claim payments at our average reserve discount rate.

11. Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

Regulatory and Litigation Matters

We establish liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when information related to the loss contingencies shows both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. It is possible that some matters could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated as of March 31, 2019. While the potential future charges could be material in the particular quarterly or annual periods in which they are recorded, based on information currently known by management, management does not believe any such charges are likely to have a material adverse effect on LNC’s financial condition.

For some matters, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters in which a loss is probable, an accrual has been made. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made. Accordingly, the estimate contained in this paragraph reflects two types of matters. For some matters included within this estimate, an accrual has been made, but there is a reasonable possibility that an exposure exists in excess of the amount accrued. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of the accrued amount. For other matters included within this estimation, no accrual has been made because a loss, while potentially estimable, is believed to be reasonably possible but not probable. In these cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. As of March 31, 2019, we estimate the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses to be up to approximately $50 million.

Cost of Insurance Litigation

Glover v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, No. 3:16-cv-00827, is a putative class action that was served on LNL on June 8, 2016. Plaintiff is the owner of a universal life insurance policy who alleges that LNL charged more for non-guaranteed cost of insurance than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all universal life and variable universal life policyholders who owned policies containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions that are similar to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on behalf of all such policyholders. On January 11, 2019, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. In response, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint, which we have opposed.

Hanks v. The Lincoln Life and Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”) and Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company (“Voya”), filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:16-cv-6399, is a putative class action that was served on LLANY on August 12, 2016. Plaintiff owns a universal life policy originally issued by Aetna (now Voya) and alleges that (i) Voya breached the terms of the policy when it increased non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates on Plaintiff’s policy; and (ii) LLANY, as reinsurer and administrator of Plaintiff’s policy, engaged in wrongful conduct related to the cost of insurance increase and was unjustly enriched as a result. Plaintiff seeks to represent all owners of Aetna life insurance policies that were subject to non-guaranteed cost of insurance rate increases in 2016 and seeks damages on their behalf. We are vigorously defending this matter.

EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch, et al. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:17-cv-02592, is a civil action filed on February 1, 2017. Plaintiffs own Legend Series universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Plaintiffs allege that LNL breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts when it increased cost of insurance rates beginning in 2016. We are vigorously defending this matter.

In re: Lincoln National COI Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Master File No. 2:16-cv-06605-GJP, is a consolidated litigation matter related to multiple putative class action filings that were consolidated by an order dated March 20, 2017. In addition to consolidating a number of existing matters, the order also covers any future cases filed in the same district related to the same subject matter. Plaintiffs own universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Plaintiffs allege that LNL and LNC breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts by increasing non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates beginning in 2016. Plaintiffs seek to represent classes of policyowners and seek damages on their behalf. We are vigorously defending this matter.

In re: Lincoln National 2017 COI Rate Litigation, Master File No. 2:17-cv-04150 is a consolidated litigation matter related to multiple putative class action filings that were consolidated by an order of the court in March 2018. Plaintiffs own universal life insurance policies originally issued by former Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Plaintiffs allege that LNL and LNC breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts by increasing non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates beginning in 2017. Plaintiffs seek to represent classes of policyholders and seek damages on their behalf. We are vigorously defending this matter.

Iwanski v. First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company (“FPP”), No. 2:18-cv-01573 filed in the U.S. District Court for the District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania is a putative class action that was filed on April 13, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that defendant FPP breached the terms of his life insurance policy by deducting non-guaranteed cost of insurance charges in excess of what is permitted by the policies. Plaintiff seeks to represent all owners of universal life insurance policies issued by FPP containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions that are similar to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on their behalf. Breach of contract is the only cause of action asserted. We are vigorously defending this matter.

TVPX ARS INC., as Securities Intermediary for Consolidated Wealth Management, LTD. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:18-cv-02989, is a putative class action that was filed on July 17, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that LNL charged more for non-guaranteed cost of insurance than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all universal life and variable universal life policyholders who own policies issued by LNL or its predecessors containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions that are similar to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on behalf of all such policyholders. We are vigorously defending this matter.

LSH Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as securities intermediary for LSH Co. v. Lincoln National Corporation and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:18-cv-05529, is a civil action filed on December 21, 2018. Plaintiffs own universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Plaintiffs allege that LNL breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts when it increased non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates in 2016 and 2017. Because the majority of policies at issue experienced a rate change in 2016, we expect the case will be consolidated with the In re: Lincoln National COI Litigation and EFG Bank cases, discussed above. We are vigorously defending this matter.

Commitments

Leases

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02, which resulted in a new measurement and recognition of our long-term operating leases on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 2 for additional information.

We lease office space and certain equipment under various long-term lease agreements, and we also enter into sale-leaseback transactions. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. Our leases do not provide an implicit rate; therefore, we use our incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The ROU asset is calculated using the initial lease liability amount, plus any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, minus any lease incentives received, plus any initial direct costs incurred. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. Our lease agreements may contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

We recognized operating lease ROU assets of $197 million and associated lease liabilities of $204 million as of March 31, 2019. We classified the operating lease ROU assets within other assets and the lease liabilities within other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The weighted-average discount rate and remaining lease term on our operating leases was 3.4% and 7 years, respectively, as of March 31, 2019. Operating lease expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019, was $13 million and reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

As of March 31, 2019, the net book value of assets recorded as finance leases under sale-leaseback transactions was $177 million, and the associated accumulated amortization was $300 million. These transactions have been classified as other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These assets will continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the assets’ remaining lives. The weighted-average discount rate and remaining lease term on our sale-leaseback transactions was 2.5% and 3 years, respectively, as of March 31, 2019.

Finance lease expense (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2019
Amortization of ROU assets (1)		$	18
Interest on lease liabilities (2)			3
Total		$	21

⁽¹⁾

Amortization of ROU assets is reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽²⁾

Interest on lease liabilities is reported in interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The table below presents cash flow information (in millions) related to leases:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
		March 31,
		2019
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases		$	14
Financing cash flows from finance leases			3

Supplemental Non-cash Information
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new lease obligations:
Operating leases		$	10

Our future minimum lease payments (in millions) under non-cancellable leases as of March 31, 2019, were as follows:



	Operating		Finance
	Leases		Leases
2019	$	32	$	93
2020		37		57
2021		36		67
2022		32		67
2023		29		91
Thereafter		67		28
Total future minimum lease payments		233		403
Less: Amount representing interest		29		39
Present value of minimum lease payments	$	204	$	364

As of March 31, 2019, we had additional office space leases that had not yet commenced totaling $37 million. These leases will commence between the second and fourth quarters of 2019 and have lease terms of 4 to 11 years.

12. Shares and Stockholders’ Equity

Common Shares

The changes in our common stock (number of shares) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Common Stock
Balance as of beginning-of-year	205,862,760		218,090,114
Stock issued for exercise of warrants	203,530		20,040
Stock compensation/issued for benefit plans	809,670		585,322
Retirement/cancellation of shares	(3,888,731	)	-
Balance as of end-of-period	202,987,229		218,695,476

Common Stock as of End-of-Period
Basic basis	202,987,229		218,695,476
Diluted basis	204,200,031		222,379,443

Our common stock is without par value.

Average Shares

A reconciliation of the denominator (number of shares) in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share was as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Weighted-average shares, as used in basic calculation	204,290,759		218,368,994
Shares to cover exercise of outstanding warrants	173,837		642,787
Shares to cover non-vested stock	1,049,556		1,592,959
Average stock options outstanding during the period	1,519,184		1,969,591
Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed proceeds
from exercising outstanding warrants	(29,176	)	(81,088	)
Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed
proceeds and benefits from exercising stock
options (at average market price for the period)	(1,041,630	)	(1,103,154	)
Shares repurchasable from measured but
unrecognized stock option expense	(867	)	(24,578	)
Average deferred compensation shares	-		922,061
Weighted-average shares, as used in diluted calculation	205,961,663		222,287,572

We have participants in our deferred compensation plans who selected LNC stock as the measure for the investment return attributable to all or a portion of their deferral amounts. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the effect of settling this obligation in LNC stock (“equity classification”) was more dilutive than the scenario of settling in cash (“liability classification”). Therefore, for our EPS calculation for this period, we added these shares to the denominator and adjusted the numerator to present net income as if the shares had been accounted for under equity classification by removing the mark-to-market adjustment included in net income attributable to these deferred units of LNC stock. The amount of this adjustment was $2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

AOCI

The following summarizes the components and changes in AOCI (in millions):



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on AFS Securities
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	557		$	3,486
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards		-			674
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		3,556			(3,063	)
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment		14			52
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI, future contract benefits and other contract holder funds		(928	)		958
Income tax benefit (expense)		(563	)		432
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)		(15	)		(18	)
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(4	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		3			5
Balance as of end-of-period	$	2,649		$	2,556
Unrealized OTTI on AFS Securities
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	33		$	44
(Increases) attributable to:
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards		-			9
Gross OTTI recognized in OCI during the period		(16	)		-
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		1			-
Income tax benefit (expense)		4			-
Decreases attributable to:
Changes in fair value, sales, maturities or other settlements of AFS securities		6			(9	)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(2	)		(10	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		4
Balance as of end-of-period	$	25		$	38
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	139		$	(29	)
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard		-			(6	)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		(36	)		16
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment		(14	)		(50	)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		6			4
Income tax benefit (expense)		10			7
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)		8			3
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(1	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	99		$	(60	)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	(23	)	$	(14	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment arising during the period		3			5
Balance as of end-of-period	$	(20	)	$	(9	)
Funded Status of Employee Benefit Plans
Balance as of beginning-of-year	$	(299	)	$	(257	)
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard		-			(35	)
Adjustment arising during the period		(1	)		-
Balance as of end-of-period	$	(300	)	$	(292	)

The following summarizes the reclassifications out of AOCI (in millions) and the associated line item in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on AFS Securities
Gross reclassification	$	(15	)	$	(18	)	Total realized gain (loss)
Associated amortization of DAC,
VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(4	)	Total realized gain (loss)
Reclassification before income							Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)		(16	)		(22	)	operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)		3			5		Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassification, net of income tax	$	(13	)	$	(17	)	Net income (loss)

Unrealized OTTI on AFS Securities
Gross reclassification	$	-		$	-		Total realized gain (loss)
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			-		Total realized gain (loss)
Reclassification before income							Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)		-			-		operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)		-			-		Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassification, net of income tax	$	-		$	-		Net income (loss)

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Gross reclassifications:
Interest rate contracts	$	1		$	1		Net investment income
Interest rate contracts		(1	)		(3	)	Interest and debt expense
Foreign currency contracts		7			5		Net investment income
Foreign currency contracts		1			-		Total realized gain (loss)
Total gross reclassifications		8			3
Associated amortization of DAC,
VOBA, DSI and DFEL		(1	)		(1	)	Commissions and other expenses
Reclassifications before income							Income (loss) from continuing
tax benefit (expense)		7			2		operations before taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		-		Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Reclassifications, net of income tax	$	6		$	2		Net income (loss)

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments (in millions) were as follows:



	As of March 31, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
	Carrying			Fair			Carrying			Fair
	Value			Value			Value			Value
Assets
Fixed maturity AFS securities	$	98,050		$	98,050		$	94,024		$	94,024
Trading securities		3,314			3,314			1,950			1,950
Equity securities		153			153			99			99
Mortgage loans on real estate		13,997			13,964			13,260			13,092
Derivative investments (1)		981			981			1,107			1,107
Other investments		2,740			2,740			2,255			2,255
Cash and invested cash		1,593			1,593			2,345			2,345
Other assets:
GLB direct embedded derivatives		439			439			123			123
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		50			50			72			72
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives		872			872			902			902
Separate account assets		143,369			143,369			132,833			132,833

Liabilities
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives		(1,730	)		(1,730	)		(1,305	)		(1,305	)
Other contract holder funds:
Remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts		(1,948	)		(1,948	)		(542	)		(542	)
Account values of certain investment contracts		(35,772	)		(38,790	)		(34,535	)		(36,358	)
Short-term debt		(300	)		(309	)		-			-
Long-term debt		(5,572	)		(5,534	)		(5,839	)		(5,604	)
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives		(177	)		(177	)		(3	)		(3	)
Other liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (1)		(242	)		(242	)		(160	)		(160	)
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		(8	)		(8	)		-			-

⁽¹⁾

We have master netting agreements with each of our derivative counterparties, which allow for the netting of our derivative asset and liability positions by counterparty.

Valuation Methodologies and Associated Inputs for Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used to determine the fair value of our financial instruments not carried at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Considerable judgment is required to develop these assumptions used to measure fair value. Accordingly, the estimates shown are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a one-time, current market exchange of all of our financial instruments.

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

The fair value of mortgage loans on real estate is established using a discounted cash flow method based on credit rating, maturity and future income. The ratings for mortgages in good standing are based on property type, location, market conditions, occupancy, debt-service coverage, loan-to-value, quality of tenancy, borrower and payment record. The fair value for impaired mortgage loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our mortgage loans on real estate are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Other Investments

The carrying value of our assets classified as other investments approximates fair value. Other investments includes primarily LPs and other privately held investments that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and the carrying value is based on our proportional share of the net assets of the LPs. Other investments also ~~include FHLB~~includes Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our LPs, other privately held investments and FHLB stock are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The remaining assets in other investments include

cash collateral receivables and securities that are not LPs or other privately held investments. The inputs used to measure the fair value of these assets are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Separate Account Assets

Separate account assets are primarily carried at fair value. A portion of our separate account assets includes LPs, which are accounted for using the equity method of ~~accounting and the~~accounting. The carrying value is based on our proportional share of the net assets of the ~~LPs.~~LPs and approximates fair value. The inputs used to measure the fair value of the separate account asset LPs are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Other Contract Holder Funds

Other contract holder funds include remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts and account values of certain investment contracts. The fair value for the remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts is estimated using discounted cash flow calculations as of the balance sheet date. These calculations are based on interest rates currently offered on similar contracts with maturities that are consistent with those remaining for the contracts being valued. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts carrying value approximated fair value. The fair value of the account values of certain investment contracts is based on their approximate surrender value as of the balance sheet date. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our other contract holder funds are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

The fair value of short-term and long-term debt is based on quoted market prices. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our short-term and long-term debt are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value

We did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, or December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and we noted no changes in our valuation methodologies between these periods.

3436

The following summarizes our financial instruments carried at fair value (in millions) on a recurring basis by the fair value hierarchy ~~levels described in “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Note 1 of our 2017 Form 10-K:~~levels:



		As of June 30, 2018														As of March 31, 2019
		Quoted														Quoted
		Prices														Prices
		in Active														in Active
	Markets for			Significant											Markets for			Significant
		Identical		Observable				Unobservable				Total				Identical		Observable				Unobservable				Total
		Assets			Inputs				Inputs			Fair				Assets			Inputs				Inputs			Fair
		(Level 1)			(Level 2)				(Level 3)			Value				(Level 1)			(Level 2)				(Level 3)			Value
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds		$	-		$	76,860			$	3,181		$	80,041			$	-		$	79,687			$	3,521		$	83,208
ABS			-			987				31			1,018				-			966				81			1,047
U.S. government bonds			402			20				-			422				405			18				-			423
Foreign government bonds			-			363				108			471				-			343				110			453
RMBS			-			3,374				-			3,374				-			3,414				-			3,414
CMBS			-			742				5			747				-			883				2			885
CLOs			-			974				145			1,119				-			2,340				97			2,437
State and municipal bonds			-			5,248				-			5,248				-			5,569				-			5,569
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities			75			467				78			620				71			465				78			614
Trading securities			43			1,385				22			1,450				45			3,033				236			3,314
Equity securities			29			57				26			112				67			61				25			153
Derivative investments (1)			-			597				541			1,138				-			826				672			1,498
Other investments			149			-				-			149				151			-				-			151
Cash and invested cash			-			1,775				-			1,775				-			1,593				-			1,593
Other assets:
GLB direct embedded derivatives			-			-				1,248			1,248				-			-				439			439
GLB ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				41			41				-			-				50			50
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				29			29				-			-				872			872
Separate account assets			729			143,468				-			144,197				696			142,657				-			143,353
Total assets		$	1,427		$	236,317			$	5,455		$	243,199			$	1,435		$	241,855			$	6,183		$	249,473

Liabilities
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives		$	-		$	-			$	(1,400	)	$	(1,400	)		$	-		$	-			$	(1,730	)	$	(1,730	)
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives			-			(25	)			-			(25	)			-			(177	)			-			(177	)
Other liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (1)			-			(396	)			(448	)		(844	)			-			(354	)			(405	)		(759	)
GLB ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				(131	)		(131	)			-			-				(8	)		(8	)
Total liabilities		$	-		$	(421	)		$	(1,979	)	$	(2,400	)		$	-		$	(531	)		$	(2,143	)	$	(2,674	)

3537


		As of December 31, 2017														As of December 31, 2018
		Quoted														Quoted
		Prices														Prices
		in Active														in Active
	Markets for			Significant											Markets for			Significant
		Identical		Observable				Unobservable				Total				Identical		Observable				Unobservable				Total
		Assets			Inputs				Inputs			Fair				Assets			Inputs				Inputs			Fair
		(Level 1)			(Level 2)				(Level 3)			Value				(Level 1)			(Level 2)				(Level 3)			Value
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds		$	-		$	79,125			$	3,091		$	82,216			$	-		$	77,079			$	3,269		$	80,348
ABS			-			947				27			974				-			937				29			966
U.S. government bonds			556			6				5			567				399			18				-			417
Foreign government bonds			-			341				110			451				-			339				109			448
RMBS			-			3,453				12			3,465				-			3,366				7			3,373
CMBS			-			594				6			600				-			802				2			804
CLOs			-			717				91			808				-			1,625				105			1,730
State and municipal bonds			-			5,119				-			5,119				-			5,345				-			5,345
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities			71			493				76			640				67			451				75			593
Equity AFS securities			28			56				162			246
Trading securities			73			1,498				49			1,620				43			1,840				67			1,950
Equity securities																	16			58				25			99
Derivative investments (1)			-			994				603			1,597				-			727				705			1,432
Other investments			150			-				-			150				150			-				-			150
Cash and invested cash			-			1,628				-			1,628				-			2,345				-			2,345
Other assets:
GLB direct embedded derivatives			-			-				903			903				-			-				123			123
GLB ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				51			51				-			-				72			72
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				11			11				-			-				902			902
Separate account assets			814			143,405				-			144,219				665			132,135				-			132,800
Total assets		$	1,692		$	238,376			$	5,197		$	245,265			$	1,340		$	227,067			$	5,490		$	233,897

Liabilities
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives		$	-		$	-			$	(1,418	)	$	(1,418	)		$	-		$	-			$	(1,305	)	$	(1,305	)
Long-term debt			-			(1,127	)			-			(1,127	)
Reinsurance related embedded derivatives			-			(57	)			-			(57	)			-			(3	)			-			(3	)
Other liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (1)			-			(447	)			(573	)		(1,020	)			-			(314	)			(171	)		(485	)
GLB ceded embedded derivatives			-			-				(67	)		(67	)
Total liabilities		$	-		$	(1,631	)		$	(2,058	)	$	(3,689	)		$	-		$	(317	)		$	(1,476	)	$	(1,793	)

⁽¹⁾

Derivative investment assets and liabilities are presented within the fair value hierarchy ~~are presented~~ on a gross basis by derivative type and not on a master netting basis by counterparty.

3638

The following summarizes changes to our financial instruments carried at fair value (in millions) and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This summary excludes any effect of amortization of ~~deferred acquisition costs~~DAC, value of business acquired (“~~DAC”~~VOBA”), ~~VOBA,~~ deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) and deferred front-end loads (“DFEL”). The gains and losses below may include changes in fair value due in part to observable inputs that are a component of the valuation methodology.



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018																		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
							Gains		Issuances,				Transfers												Gains		Issuances,				Transfers
				Items			(Losses)			Sales,			Into or									Items			(Losses)			Sales,			Into or
				Included			in		Maturities,				Out									Included			in		Maturities,				Out
	Beginning			in			OCI		Settlements,				of			Ending			Beginning			in			OCI		Settlements,				of			Ending
	Fair			Net			and			Calls,			Level 3,			Fair			Fair			Net			and			Calls,			Level 3,			Fair
	Value			Income			Other (1)			Net (2)			Net (3)(4)			Value			Value			Income			Other (1)			Net			Net (2)			Value
Investments: ~~(5)~~(4)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	3,192		$	3		$	(124	)	$	157		$	(47	)	$	3,181		$	3,269		$	(1	)	$	70		$	200		$	(17	)	$	3,521
ABS		26			-			-			5			-			31			29			-			-			52			-			81
U.S. government bonds		5			-			-			(5	)		-			-
Foreign government bonds		108			-			-			-			-			108			109			-			1			-			-			110
RMBS																				7			-			-			-			(7	)		-
CMBS		27			-			-			(1	)		(21	)		5			2			-			-			-			-			2
CLOs		2			-			-			145			(2	)		145			105			-			-			97			(105	)		97
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		77			-			1			-			-			78			75			-			3			-			-			78
Trading securities		47			(3	)		-			(22	)		-			22			67			-			-			206			(37	)		236
Equity securities		27			-			-			(1	)		-			26			25			-			-			-			-			25
Derivative investments		279			(108	)		(39	)		(39	)		-			93			534			(383	)		46			70			-			267
Other assets: ~~(6)~~(5)
GLB direct embedded derivatives		1,110			138			-			-			-			1,248			123			316			-			-			-			439
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		45			(4	)		-			-			-			41			72			(22	)		-			-			-			50
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives		17			1			-			11			-			29			902			77			-			(107	)		-			872
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives ~~(6)~~(5)		(1,346	)		(62	)		-			8			-			(1,400	)		(1,305	)		(316	)		-			(109	)		-			(1,730	)
Other liabilities – GLB ceded embedded
derivatives ~~(6)~~(5)		(111	)		(20	)		-			-			-			(131	)		-			(8	)		-			-			-			(8	)
Total, net	$	3,505		$	(55	)	$	(162	)	$	258		$	(70	)	$	3,476		$	4,014		$	(337	)	$	120		$	409		$	(166	)	$	4,040

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Gains
Issuances,
Transfers

Items

(Losses)

Sales

Into or

Included

in
Maturities,
Out

Beginning

in

OCI
Settlements,
of

Ending

Fair

Net

and

Calls,

Level 3,

Fair

Value

Income

Other (1)

Net

Net (3)

Value

Investments: (5)

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
2,403

$
5

$
53

$
57

$
(1
)
$
2,517

ABS

29

-

-

-

14

43

U.S. government bonds

5

-

-

-

-

5

Foreign government bonds

110

-

(1
)

-

-

109

RMBS

7

-

-

-

-

7

CMBS

44

-

1

14

(38
)

21

CLOs

88

-

-

13

(73
)

28

State and municipal bonds

1

-

-

-

(1
)

-

Hybrid and redeemable

preferred securities

79

-

8

-

(5
)

82

Equity AFS securities

182

-

-

1

-

183

Trading securities

60

1

1

-

(3
)

59

Derivative investments

112

58

65

(80
)

-

155

Other assets: (6)

GLB direct embedded derivatives

226

72

-

-

-

298

GLB ceded embedded derivatives

116

(31
)

-

-

-

85

Future contract benefits – indexed annuity

and IUL contracts embedded derivatives (6)

(1,238
)

(64
)

-

34

-

(1,268
)
Total, net
$
2,224

$
41

$
127

$
39

$
(107
)
$
2,324

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Gains
Issuances,
Transfers

Items

(Losses)
Sales,
Into or

Included

in
Maturities,
Out

Beginning

in

OCI
Settlements,
of

Ending

Fair

Net

and

Calls,

Level 3,

Fair

Value

Income

Other (1)

Net (2)

Net (3)(4)

Value

Investments: (5)

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
3,091

$
6

$
(107
)
$
231

$
(40
)
$
3,181

ABS

27

-

(1
)

5

-

31

U.S. government bonds

5

-

-

(5
)

-

-

Foreign government bonds

110

-

(2
)

-

-

108

RMBS

12

-

-

-

(12
)

-

CMBS

6

1

-

19

(21
)

5

CLOs

91

-

-

147

(93
)

145

Hybrid and redeemable

preferred securities

76

-

2

-

-

78

Equity AFS securities

162

-

-

-

(162
)

-

Trading securities

49

(5
)

-

(22
)

-

22

Equity securities

-

-

-

-

26

26

Derivative investments

30

222

(59
)

(100
)

-

93

Other assets: (6)

GLB direct embedded derivatives

903

345

-

-

-

1,248

GLB ceded embedded derivatives

51

(10
)

-

-

-

41

Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives

11

1

-

17

-

29

Future contract benefits – indexed annuity

and IUL contracts embedded derivatives (6)

(1,418
)

(10
)

-

28

-

(1,400
)
Other liabilities: (6)

GLB ceded embedded derivatives

(67
)

(64
)

-

-

-

(131
)
Total, net
$
3,139

$
486

$
(167
)
$
320

$
(302
)
$
3,476


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
							Gains		Issuances,				Transfers						For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
				Items			(Losses)		Sales,				Into or												Gains		Issuances,				Transfers
				Included			in		Maturities,				Out									Items			(Losses)			Sales			Into or
	Beginning			in			OCI		Settlements,				of			Ending						Included			in		Maturities,				Out
	Fair			Net			and			Calls,			Level 3,			Fair			Beginning			in			OCI		Settlements,				of			Ending
	Value			Income			Other (1)			Net			Net (3)			Value			Fair			Net			and			Calls,			Level 3,			Fair
Investments: (5)
																			Value			Income			Other (1)			Net			Net (2)(3)			Value
Investments: (4)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	2,405		$	11		$	118		$	(147	)	$	130		$	2,517		$	3,091		$	3		$	17		$	74		$	7		$	3,192
ABS		33			-			1			-			9			43			27			-			(1	)		-			-			26
U.S. government bonds		-			-			-			-			5			5			5			-			-			-			-			5
Foreign government bonds		111			-			(2	)		-			-			109			110			-			(2	)		-			-			108
RMBS		3			-			-			4			-			7			12			-			-			-			(12	)		-
CMBS		7			-			1			55			(42	)		21			6			1			-			20			-			27
CLOs		68			-			-			18			(58	)		28			91			-			-			2			(91	)		2
State and municipal bonds		-			(1	)		-			-			1			-
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		76			-			11			-			(5	)		82			76			-			1			-			-			77
Equity AFS securities		177			1			(1	)		6			-			183			162			-			-			-			(162	)		-
Trading securities		65			2			8			(16	)		-			59			49			(2	)		-			-			-			47
Equity securities																				-			-			-			1			26			27
Derivative investments		(93	)		(11	)		88			171			-			155			30			329			(19	)		(61	)		-			279
Other assets: (6)
Other assets: (5)
GLB direct embedded derivatives		-			298			-			-			-			298			903			207			-			-			-			1,110
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		203			(118	)		-			-			-			85			51			(6	)		-			-			-			45
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives																				11			-			-			6			-			17
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives (6)		(1,139	)		(184	)		-			55			-			(1,268	)
Other liabilities – GLB direct embedded
derivatives (6)		(371	)		371			-			-			-			-
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives (5)																				(1,418	)		52			-			20			-			(1,346	)
Other liabilities – GLB ceded embedded
derivatives (5)																				(67	)		(44	)		-			-			-			(111	)
Total, net	$	1,545		$	369		$	224		$	146		$	40		$	2,324		$	3,139		$	540		$	(4	)	$	62		$	(232	)	$	3,505

⁽¹⁾

The changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps are offset by an adjustment to derivative investments (see Note 5)6).

⁽²⁾

~~Net issuances, sales, maturities, settlements, calls, net include financial instruments acquired from Liberty Life~~Transfers into or out of Level 3 for AFS and trading securities are reported at amortized cost as ~~follows: corporate bonds~~ of ~~$67 million~~the beginning-of-year. For AFS and ~~asset-backed~~trading securities, of ~~$17 million.~~the difference between beginning-of-year amortized cost and beginning-of-year fair value was included in OCI and earnings, respectively, in the prior period.

⁽³⁾

Transfers into or out of Level 3 for AFS and trading securities are displayed at amortized cost as of the beginning-of-year. For AFS and trading securities, the difference between beginning-of-period amortized cost and beginning-of-period fair value was included in OCI and earnings, respectively, in the prior period.

⁽⁴⁾

~~Transfers into or out of Level 3 for~~ FHLB stock between equity securities and other investments are reported at cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

⁽⁵⁾⁽⁴⁾

Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts are included in net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Gains (losses) from sales, maturities, settlements and calls and OTTI are included in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

⁽⁶⁾⁽⁵⁾

Gains (losses) from sales, maturities, settlements and calls are included in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The following provides the components of the items included in issuances, sales, maturities, settlements and calls, net, excluding any effect of amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in future contract benefits, (in millions) as reported above:



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018																		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Issuances			Sales			Maturities		Settlements				Calls			Total			Issuances			Sales			Maturities		Settlements				Calls			Total
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	400		$	(103	)	$	-		$	(79	)	$	(61	)	$	157		$	267		$	(2	)	$	(7	)	$	(51	)	$	(7	)	$	200
ABS		22			(17	)		-			-			-			5			52			-			-			-			-			52
U.S. government bonds		-			(5	)		-			-			-			(5	)
CMBS		-			-			-			(1	)		-			(1	)
CLOs		145			-			-			-			-			145			97			-			-			-			-			97
Trading securities		2			(24	)		-			-			-			(22	)		207			-			-			(1	)		-			206
Equity securities		-			(1	)		-			-			-			(1	)
Derivative investments		61			11			(111	)		-			-			(39	)		131			(15	)		(46	)		-			-			70
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives		11			-			-			-			-			11			19			-			-			(126	)		-			(107	)
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives		(48	)		-			-			56			-			8			(148	)		-			-			39			-			(109	)
Total, net	$	593		$	(139	)	$	(111	)	$	(24	)	$	(61	)	$	258		$	625		$	(17	)	$	(53	)	$	(139	)	$	(7	)	$	409



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017																		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Issuances			Sales			Maturities		Settlements				Calls			Total			Issuances			Sales			Maturities		Settlements				Calls		Total
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	162		$	(3	)	$	(25	)	$	(64	)	$	(13	)	$	57		$	223		$	(53	)	$	(2	)	$	(94	)	$	-	$	74
CMBS		14			-			-			-			-			14			21			-			-			(1	)		-		20
CLOs		13			-			-			-			-			13			2			-			-			-			-		2
Equity AFS securities		1			-			-			-			-			1
Equity securities																				1			-			-			-			-		1
Derivative investments		48			(29	)		(99	)		-			-			(80	)		68			(6	)		(123	)		-			-		(61	)
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives																				6			-			-			-			-		6
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives		(13	)		-			-			47			-			34			(27	)		-			-			47			-		20
Total, net	$	225		$	(32	)	$	(124	)	$	(17	)	$	(13	)	$	39		$	294		$	(59	)	$	(125	)	$	(48	)	$	-	$	62

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Issuances

Sales

Maturities
Settlements
Calls

Total

Investments:

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
623

$
(156
)
$
(2
)
$
(173
)
$
(61
)
$
231

ABS

22

(17
)

-

-

-

5

U.S. government bonds

-

(5
)

-

-

-

(5
)
CMBS

21

-

-

(2
)

-

19

CLOs

147

-

-

-

-

147

Trading securities

2

(24
)

-

-

-

(22
)
Equity securities

1

(1
)

-

-

-

-

Derivative investments

129

5

(234
)

-

-

(100
)
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded

embedded derivatives

17

-

-

-

-

17

Future contract benefits – indexed annuity

and IUL contracts embedded derivatives

(75
)

-

-

103

-

28

Total, net
$
887

$
(198
)
$
(236
)
$
(72
)
$
(61
)
$
320

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Issuances

Sales

Maturities
Settlements
Calls

Total

Investments:

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
200

$
(65
)
$
(47
)
$
(127
)
$
(108
)
$
(147
)
RMBS

4

-

-

-

-

4

CMBS

55

-

-

-

-

55

CLOs

18

-

-

-

-

18

Equity AFS securities

8

(2
)

-

-

-

6

Trading securities

2

(17
)

-

(1
)

-

(16
)
Derivative investments

95

265

(189
)

-

-

171

Future contract benefits – indexed annuity

and IUL contracts embedded derivatives

(31
)

-

-

86

-

55

Total, net
$
351

$
181

$
(236
)
$
(42
)
$
(108
)
$
146

The following summarizes changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income, excluding any effect of amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in future contract benefits, related to financial instruments carried at fair value classified within Level 3 that we still held (in millions):



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Derivative investments	$	(169	)	$	(2	)	$	106		$	(76	)	$	(287	)	$	281
Embedded derivatives:
Indexed annuity and IUL contracts		(6	)		-			(7	)		(15	)		(32	)		(4	)
GLB		313			231			689			978			481			376
Total, net (1)	$	138		$	229		$	788		$	887		$	162		$	653

⁽¹⁾

Included in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The following provides the components of the transfers into and out of Level 3 (in millions) as reported above:



	For the Three								For the Three								For the Three								For the Three
	Months Ended								Months Ended								Months Ended								Months Ended
	June 30, 2018								June 30, 2017								March 31, 2019								March 31, 2018
	Transfers		Transfers						Transfers		Transfers						Transfers		Transfers						Transfers		Transfers
	Into		Out of						Into		Out of						Into		Out of						Into		Out of
	Level 3		Level 3			Total			Level 3		Level 3			Total			Level 3		Level 3			Total			Level 3		Level 3			Total
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	3	$	(50	)	$	(47	)	$	1	$	(2	)	$	(1	)	$	83	$	(100	)	$	(17	)	$	40	$	(33	)	$	7
ABS		-		-			-			15		(1	)		14
CMBS		-		(21	)		(21	)		3		(41	)		(38	)
RMBS																		-		(7	)		(7	)		-		(12	)		(12	)
CLOs		-		(2	)		(2	)		-		(73	)		(73	)		-		(105	)		(105	)		-		(91	)		(91	)
State and municipal bonds		-		-			-			-		(1	)		(1	)
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities		-		-			-			-		(5	)		(5	)
Equity AFS securities																		-		-			-			-		(162	)		(162	)
Trading securities		-		-			-			-		(3	)		(3	)		-		(37	)		(37	)		-		-			-
Equity securities																		-		-			-			26		-			26
Total, net	$	3	$	(73	)	$	(70	)	$	19	$	(126	)	$	(107	)	$	83	$	(249	)	$	(166	)	$	66	$	(298	)	$	(232	)

For the Six

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30, 2018

June 30, 2017

Transfers

Transfers

Transfers

Transfers

Into

Out of

Into

Out of

Level 3

Level 3

Total

Level 3

Level 3

Total

Investments:

Fixed maturity AFS securities:

Corporate bonds
$
43

$
(83
)
$
(40
)
$
161

$
(31
)
$
130

ABS

-

-

-

15

(6
)

9

U.S. government bonds

-

-

-

5

-

5

RMBS

-

(12
)

(12
)

-

-

-

CMBS

-

(21
)

(21
)

3

(45
)

(42
)
CLOs

-

(93
)

(93
)

30

(88
)

(58
)
State and municipal bonds

-

-

-

2

(1
)

1

Hybrid and redeemable preferred

securities

-

-

-

-

(5
)

(5
)
Equity AFS securities

-

(162
)

(162
)

-

-

-

Trading securities

-

-

-

3

(3
)

-

Equity securities

26

-

26

-

-

Total, net
$
69

$
(371
)
$
(302
)
$
219

$
(179
)
$
40

Transfers into and out of Level 3 are generally the result of observable market information on a security no longer being available or becoming available to our pricing vendors. For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ transfers in and out of Level 3 were attributable primarily to the securities’ observable market information no longer being available or becoming available. In 2018, transfers into or out of Level 3 also ~~include~~included FHLB stock between equity securities and other investments at cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 are generally the result of a change in the type of input used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability at the end of the reporting period. When quoted prices in active markets become available, transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 will result. When quoted prices in active markets become unavailable, but we are able to employ a valuation methodology using significant observable inputs, transfers from Level 1 to Level 2 will result. For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ the transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy were less than $1 million for our financial instruments carried at fair value.

4342

The following summarizes the fair value (in millions), valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs of the Level 3 fair value measurements as of ~~June 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:



	Fair			Valuation	Significant	Assumption or					Fair			Valuation	Significant	Assumption or
	Value			Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Input Ranges					Value			Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Input Ranges
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS and trading
securities:
Corporate bonds	$	2,470		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	0.6	%	-	23.4	%	$	2,604		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	0.6	%	-	30.0	%
ABS		23		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	3.0	%	-	3.0	%		23		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	3.0	%	-	3.0	%
Foreign government bonds		78		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	1.7	%	-	3.0	%		77		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	1.4	%	-	3.1	%
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		4		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	1.8	%	-	1.8	%		4		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	1.6	%	-	1.6	%
Equity securities		21		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	4.5	%	-	5.3	%		21		Discounted cash flow	Liquidity/duration adjustment (1)	4.5	%	-	5.2	%
Other assets:
GLB direct and ceded
embedded derivatives		1,289		Discounted cash flow	Long-term lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	30	%		489		Discounted cash flow	Long-term lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	30	%
					Utilization of guaranteed withdrawals (3)	85	%	-	100	%					Utilization of guaranteed withdrawals (3)	85	%	-	100	%
					Claims utilization factor (4)	60	%	-	100	%					Claims utilization factor (4)	60	%	-	100	%
					Premiums utilization factor (4)	80	%	-	115	%					Premiums utilization factor (4)	80	%	-	115	%
					NPR (5)	0.02	%	-	0.31	%					NPR (5)	0.02	%	-	0.32	%
					Mortality rate (6)				(8)						Mortality rate (6)				(8)
					Volatility (7)	1	%	-	29	%					Volatility (7)	1	%	-	29	%

Indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives		29		Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	9	%		872		Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	9	%
					Mortality rate (6)				(8)						Mortality rate (6)				(8)
Liabilities
Future contract benefits – indexed
annuity and IUL contracts
embedded derivatives	$	(1,400	)	Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	9	%	$	(1,730	)	Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	9	%
					Mortality rate (6)				(8)						Mortality rate (6)				(8)
Other liabilities – GLB ceded
embedded derivatives		(131	)	Discounted cash flow	Long-term lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	30	%		(8	)	Discounted cash flow	Long-term lapse rate (2)	1	%	-	30	%
					Utilization of guaranteed withdrawals (3)	85	%	-	100	%					Utilization of guaranteed withdrawals (3)	85	%	-	100	%
					Claims utilization factor (4)	60	%	-	100	%					Claims utilization factor (4)	60	%	-	100	%
					Premiums utilization factor (4)	80	%	-	115	%					Premiums utilization factor (4)	80	%	-	115	%
					NPR (5)	0.02	%	-	0.31	%					NPR (5)	0.02	%	-	0.32	%
					Mortality rate (6)				(8)						Mortality rate (6)				(8)
					Volatility (7)	1	%	-	29	%					Volatility (7)	1	%	-	29	%

⁽¹⁾

The liquidity/duration adjustment input represents an estimated market participant composite of adjustments attributable to liquidity premiums, expected durations, structures and credit quality that would be applied to the market observable information of an investment.

⁽²⁾

The lapse rate input represents the estimated probability of a contract surrendering during a year, and thereby forgoing any future benefits. The range for indexed annuity and IUL contracts represents the lapse rates during the surrender charge period.

⁽³⁾

The utilization of guaranteed withdrawals input represents the estimated percentage of contract holders that utilize the guaranteed withdrawal feature.

⁽⁴⁾

The utilization factors are applied to the present value of claims or premiums, as appropriate, in the GLB reserve calculation to estimate the impact of inefficient withdrawal behavior, including taking less than or more than the maximum guaranteed withdrawal.

⁽⁵⁾

The NPR input represents the estimated additional credit spread that market participants would apply to the market observable discount rate when pricing a contract.

⁽⁶⁾

The mortality rate input represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die.

⁽⁷⁾

The volatility input represents overall volatilities assumed for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a mixture of equity and fixed-income assets. Fair value of the variable annuity GLB embedded derivatives would increase if higher volatilities were used for valuation.

⁽⁸⁾

The mortality rate is based on a combination of company and industry experience, adjusted for improvement factors.

4443

From the table above, we have excluded Level 3 fair value measurements obtained from independent, third-party pricing sources. We do not develop the significant inputs used to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities, and the information regarding the significant inputs is not readily available to us. Independent broker-quoted fair values are non-binding quotes developed by market makers or broker-dealers obtained from third-party sources recognized as market participants. The fair value of a broker-quoted asset or liability is based solely on the receipt of an updated quote from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant as we do not adjust broker quotes when used as the fair value measurement for an asset or liability. Significant increases or decreases in any of the quotes received from a third-party broker-dealer may result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

Changes in any of the significant inputs presented in the table above may result in a significant change in the fair value measurement of the asset or liability as follows:

Investments – An increase in the liquidity/duration adjustment input would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement.

Indexed annuity and IUL contracts embedded derivatives – For direct embedded derivatives, an increase in the lapse rate or mortality rate inputs would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement.

GLB embedded derivatives – Assuming our GLB direct embedded derivatives are in a liability position: an increase in our lapse rate, NPR or mortality rate inputs would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement; and an increase in the utilization of guaranteed withdrawal or volatility inputs would result in an increase in the fair value measurement.

For each category discussed above, the unobservable inputs are not inter-related; therefore, a directional change in one input will not affect the other inputs.

As part of our ongoing valuation process, we assess the reasonableness of our valuation techniques or models and make adjustments as necessary. ~~For more information, see “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Note 1 of our 2017 Form 10-K.~~

~~15.~~14. Segment Information

We provide products and services and report results through our Annuities, Retirement Plan Services, Life Insurance and Group Protection segments. As discussed in Note 3, we completed the acquisition of Liberty ~~Life.~~Life during the second quarter of 2018. Related results are included within the Group Protection segment. We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. Our reporting segments reflect the manner by which our chief operating decision makers view and manage the business. ~~See Note 21 of our 2017 Form 10-K for a brief description~~A discussion of these segments and Other ~~Operations.~~Operations is found in Note 21 of our 2018 Form 10-K.

Segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are internal measures used by our management and Board of Directors to evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Income (loss) from operations is GAAP net income excluding the after-tax effects of the following items, as applicable:

Realized gains and losses associated with the following (“excluded realized gain (loss)”):

Sales or disposals and impairments of securities;

Changes in the fair value of derivatives, embedded derivatives within certain reinsurance arrangements and trading ~~securities;~~securities (“gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments”);

Changes in the fair value of the derivatives we own to hedge our GDB riders reflected within our variable annuities;

Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives of our GLB riders reflected within variable annuity net derivative results accounted for at fair value;

Changes in the fair value of the derivatives we own to hedge our GLB riders reflected within variable annuity net derivative results;

Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities related to index call options we may purchase in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products accounted for at fair ~~value;~~value (“indexed annuity forward-starting option”); and

Changes in the fair value of equity securities;

Changes in reserves resulting from benefit ratio unlocking on our GDB and GLB ~~riders;~~riders (“benefit ratio unlocking”);

Income (loss) from reserve changes, net of related amortization, on business sold through reinsurance;

Gains (losses) on early extinguishment of debt;

Losses from the impairment of intangible assets;

Income (loss) from discontinued operations;

Acquisition and integration costs related to mergers and acquisitions; and

Income (loss) from the initial adoption of new accounting standards, regulations, and policy changes including the net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Operating revenues represent GAAP revenues excluding the pre-tax effects of the following items, as applicable:

Excluded realized gain (loss);

Revenue adjustments from the initial adoption of new accounting standards;

Amortization of DFEL arising from changes in GDB and GLB benefit ratio unlocking; and

Amortization of deferred gains arising from reserve changes on business sold through reinsurance.

~~We use~~The tables below reconcile our ~~prevailing corporate federal income tax rates~~segment measures of 21% and 35%, where applicable, while taking into account any permanent differences for events recognized differently in our financial statements and federal income tax returns when reconciling our non-GAAP measuresperformance to ~~the most comparable GAAP measure. Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations do not replace revenues and net income as~~ the GAAP measures ~~of our consolidated results of operations.~~

~~Segment information (in millions) was as follows:~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Revenues

Operating revenues:

Annuities
$
1,106

$
1,076

$
2,180

$
2,138

Retirement Plan Services

292

290

584

571

Life Insurance

1,680

1,655

3,340

3,260

Group Protection

937

541

1,490

1,082

Other Operations

58

67

125

155

Excluded realized gain (loss), pre-tax

(53
)

(52
)

(89
)

(132
)
Amortization of deferred gain arising from reserve changes

on business sold through reinsurance, pre-tax

-

-

-

1

Amortization of DFEL associated with benefit ratio unlocking, pre-tax

-

-

(1
)

2

Total revenues
$
4,020

$
3,577

$
7,629

$
7,077

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Net Income (Loss)

Income (loss) from operations:

Annuities
$
275

$
251

$
542

$
532

Retirement Plan Services

43

37

86

74

Life Insurance

150

133

294

263

Group Protection

45

35

74

42

Other Operations

(59
)

(37
)

(101
)

(51
)
Excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax

(41
)

(34
)

(69
)

(85
)
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, after-tax

-

-

(19
)

-

Benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax

7

26

(3
)

71

Net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

-

-

(13
)

-

Acquisition and integration costs related to mergers

and acquisitions, after-tax

(35
)

-

(39
)

-

Net income (loss)
$
385

$
411

$
752

$
846

~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~

~~As discussed~~presented in Note 2, we adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as of January 1, 2018, that applies primarily to commissions and advisory fees earned by our broker dealer operation. The following table illustrates the revenue recognized from contracts with customers reported within fee income and other revenues on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) ~~and timing of revenue recognition by segment~~ (in millions):

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

Retirement

Plan

Life

Group

Other

Annuities

Services

Insurance

Protection

Operations

Total

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Fee income
$
133

$
42

$
6

$
-

$
-

$
181

Other revenues

119

5

2

27

-

153

Total revenue from contracts

with customers
$
252

$
47

$
8

$
27

$
-

$
334

Timing of Revenue Recognition

Satisfaction of performance obligation:

Transferred at a point in time
$
18

$
2

$
2

$
-

$
-

$
22

Transferred over time

234

45

6

27

-

312

Total revenue from contracts

with customers
$
252

$
47

$
8

$
27

$
-

$
334

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Retirement

Plan

Life

Group

Other

Annuities

Services

Insurance

Protection

Operations

Total

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Fee income
$
266

$
84

$
11

$
-

$
-

$
361

Other revenues

239

9

5

32

-

285

Total revenue from contracts

with customers
$
505

$
93

$
16

$
32

$
-

$
646

Timing of Revenue Recognition

Satisfaction of performance obligation:

Transferred at a point in time
$
36

$
3

$
4

$
-

$
-

$
43

Transferred over time

469

90

12

32

-

603

Total revenue from contracts

with customers
$
505

$
93

$
16

$
32

$
-

$
646



	For the Three
��	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Revenues
Operating revenues:
Annuities	$	1,174		$	1,073
Retirement Plan Services		293			292
Life Insurance		1,700			1,660
Group Protection		1,138			553
Other Operations		57			67
Excluded realized gain (loss), pre-tax		(400	)		(35	)
Amortization of DFEL associated
with benefit ratio unlocking, pre-tax		3			(1	)
Total revenues	$	3,965		$	3,609

Revenue recognized from contracts with customers included in fee income consists primarily of wholesaling-related 12b-1 fees and net investment advisory fees. The 12b-1 fees are received from separate account fund sponsors as compensation for servicing the underlying mutual funds. The net investment advisory fees are related to asset management of certain separate account funds. Such revenues are recorded based on a contractual percentage of the market value of mutual fund assets over the period shares are owned by customers, and on a contractual percentage of the customer’s managed assets over the period advisory services are provided, respectively.

Revenue recognized from contracts with customers included in other revenues primarily relates to our retail sales network and consists of commission revenue for the sale of non-affiliated securities recorded on a trade-date basis and advisory fee income. Advisory fee income is asset-based revenues recorded as earned based on a contractual percentage of customer account values.



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Net Income (Loss)
Income (loss) from operations:
Annuities	$	250		$	267
Retirement Plan Services		39			43
Life Insurance		157			144
Group Protection		55			29
Other Operations		(60	)		(42	)
Excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax		(316	)		(28	)
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of
debt, after-tax		-			(19	)
Benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax		142			(10	)
Net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act		-			(13	)
Acquisition and integration costs related to
mergers and acquisitions, after-tax		(15	)		(4	)
Net income (loss)	$	252		$	367

4745

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, compared with December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and the results of operations for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, compared with the corresponding ~~periods~~period in ~~2017~~2018 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. On May 1, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Liberty ~~Life.~~Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life” or “LLACB”). Beginning on May 1, 2018, the results of operations and financial condition of Liberty Life ~~Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”),~~ were consolidated with LNC. Accordingly, all financial information presented herein for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, includes the accounts of LNC ~~for these periods~~ and the accounts of Liberty ~~Life since May 1, 2018.~~Life.

The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Part I – Item 1. Financial Statements”; our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (“~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K”), including the sections entitled “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”; ~~our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed in 2018;~~ and our current reports on Form 8-K filed in ~~2018.~~2019. For more detailed information on the risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business activities, see the risks described in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our ~~2017 Form 10-K as updated by “Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our first quarter~~ 2018 Form ~~10-Q and below.~~10-K.

In this report, in addition to providing consolidated revenues and net income (loss), we also provide segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations because we believe they are meaningful measures of revenues and the profitability of our operating segments. Financial information that ~~are~~follows is presented in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) ~~financial measures, we also provide certain non-GAAP financial measures as we believe they are meaningful to evaluate and assess the results~~, unless otherwise indicated. See Note 1 for a discussion of ~~our operating segments.~~ GAAP.

Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are the ~~primary non-GAAP~~ financial performance measures we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Accordingly, we define and report operating revenues and income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 14. Our management believes that operating revenues and income (loss) from operations explain the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in our current ~~businesses. We have~~businesses because the excluded ~~certain GAAP~~ items ~~that~~ are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments. In addition, we believe that our definitions of operating revenues and income (loss) from operations will provide investors with a more valuable measure of our performance because it better reveals trends in our business. ~~These non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures. For additional information see Note 15.~~

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE

Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain words like: “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “shall” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.

Forward-looking statements ~~involve~~are subject to risks and ~~uncertainties that may cause actual~~uncertainties. Actual results tocould differ materially from ~~the results contained~~those expressed in ~~the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary materially, some of which are described within the~~or implied by such forward-looking statements ~~include, among others:~~ due to a variety of factors, including:

Deterioration in general economic and business conditions that may affect account values, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels, claims experience and the level of pension benefit costs, funding and investment results;

Adverse global capital and credit market conditions could affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;

Because of our holding company structure, the inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;

Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business and our captive reinsurance arrangements as well as restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and ~~12b‑1~~12b-1 distribution fees; the impact of ~~recently enacted~~ U.S. federal tax reform legislation on our business, earnings and capital; and the ~~effect~~impact of ~~the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision vacating the Department of Labor’s fiduciary regulation as well as~~ any “best interest” standards of care adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or other regulations adopted by federal or state ~~regulators;~~regulators or self-regulatory organizations relating to the standard of care owed by investment advisers and/or broker-dealers;

Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;

Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses, estimated gross profits (“EGPs”) and demand for our products;

Rapidly increasing interest rates causing contract holders to surrender life insurance and annuity policies, thereby causing realized investment losses, and reduced hedge performance related to variable annuities;

Uncertainty about the effect of continuing promulgation and implementation of rules and regulations under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on us, the economy and the financial services sector in particular;

The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;

A decline in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; an acceleration of the net amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) and deferred front-end loads (“DFEL”); and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefit features of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;

Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including various hedging strategies used to offset the effect of changes in the value of liabilities due to changes in the level and volatility of the equity markets and interest rates;

A deviation in actual experience regarding future persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products, in establishing related insurance reserves and in the net amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL, which may reduce future earnings;

Changes in ~~GAAP~~accounting principles that may ~~result in unanticipated changes to~~affect our ~~net income;~~financial statements;

Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;

Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;

Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain investments in our portfolios, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on investments;

Inability to protect our intellectual property rights or claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others;

Interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems from cyberattacks or other breaches of our data security systems;

The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items, including the successful implementation of integration strategies or the achievement of anticipated synergies and operational efficiencies related to an acquisition;

The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have purchased;

Acts of terrorism, a pandemic, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely affect our businesses and the cost and availability of reinsurance;

Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;

The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and

The unanticipated loss of key management, financial planners or wholesalers.

The risks included here are not exhaustive. Our annual report on Form 10-K, ~~quarterly report on Form 10-Q,~~ current reports on Form 8-K and other documents filed with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.

Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.

INTRODUCTION

Executive Summary

We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. Through our business segments, we sell a wide range of wealth protection, accumulation and retirement income products and solutions. These products primarily include fixed and indexed annuities, variable annuities, universal life insurance (“UL”), variable universal life insurance (“VUL”), linked-benefit UL, indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”), term life insurance, employer-sponsored retirement plans and services, and group life, disability and dental.

We provide products and services and report results through our Annuities, Retirement Plan Services, Life Insurance and Group Protection segments. We also have Other Operations. These segments and Other Operations are described in “Part I – Item 1. Business” of our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K. We provide information about our segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items and realized gain (loss), key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. As discussed in Note 3, on May 1, 2018, we completed our acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Liberty Life,, which operates a group benefits business (the

“Liberty Group Business”) and individual life and individual and group annuity business, in a transaction accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. We ceded insurance policies relating to the individual life and individual and group annuity business to third-party reinsurers. The operating

results of the Liberty ~~Life~~Group Business are included in our Group Protection segment beginning on May 1, 2018. The acquisition ~~enables us to increase our market share within~~expanded the ~~group protection marketplace.~~scale and capabilities of the Group Protection business while further diversifying the Company’s sources of earnings. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our ~~2017 Form 10-K as updated by “Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our first quarter~~ 2018 Form ~~10-Q and below.~~10-K.

Our current market conditions, significant operational matters, industry trends, issues and outlook are described in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Introduction – Executive Summary” of our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The MD&A included in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K contains a detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates. The following information updates the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” provided in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K, and therefore, should be read in conjunction with that disclosure.

DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL

~~Unlocking~~

~~As stated in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical~~

~~Accounting Policies and Estimates – Unlocking” in our 2017 Form 10-K, we conduct our annual comprehensive review of the~~

~~assumptions and projection models underlying the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI, DFEL, embedded derivatives and reserves for life~~

~~insurance and annuity products in the third quarter of each year.~~

Reversion to the Mean

As variable fund returns do not move in a systematic manner, we reset the baseline of account values from which EGPs are projected, which we refer to as our reversion to the mean (“RTM”) process, as discussed in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

If we had unlocked our RTM assumption as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, we would have recorded a favorable unlocking of approximately ~~$200~~$105 million, pre-tax, for Annuities and approximately ~~$45~~$20 million, pre-tax, for ~~Life Insurance and approximately $25 million, pre-tax, for~~both Retirement Plan ~~Services.~~Services and Life Insurance.

Investments

Investment Valuation

The following summarizes investments on our ~~fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities, trading securities and derivative investments~~Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of ~~June 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:


		Quoted											Quoted
		Prices											Prices
		in Active											in Active
	Markets for			Significant								Markets for			Significant
		Identical		Observable			Unobservable						Identical		Observable			Unobservable
		Assets			Inputs			Inputs		Total			Assets			Inputs			Inputs		Total
		(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)		Fair Value			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)		Fair Value
Priced by third-party pricing services		$	698		$	78,490		$	-	$	79,188		$	739		$	84,419		$	-	$	85,158
Priced by independent broker quotations			-			-			1,093		1,093			-			-			1,688		1,688
Priced by matrices			-			12,188			-		12,188			-			12,832			-		12,832
Priced by other methods (1)			-			-			2,596		2,596			-			-			2,729		2,729
Total		$	698		$	90,678		$	3,689	$	95,065		$	739		$	97,251		$	4,417	$	102,407

Percent of total			1%			95%			4%		100%			1%			95%			4%		100%

⁽¹⁾

Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.

For more information about the valuation of our financial instruments carried at fair value, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Introduction – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Investments – Investment Valuation” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K and Note 1513 herein.

Derivatives

Our accounting policies for derivatives and the potential effect on interest spreads in a falling rate environment are discussed in Note 6 of this report and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Guaranteed Living Benefits

Within our individual annuity business, 64% and 65% of our variable annuity account values contained guaranteed living benefits (“GLB”) features as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017.~~respectively. Underperforming equity markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB features. A contract with a GLB feature is “in the money” if the contract holder’s account balance falls below the

present value of guaranteed withdrawal or income benefits, assuming no lapses. As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, 14% and ~~2017, 7%~~6%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB feature were “in the money,” and our exposure, after reinsurance, as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ was ~~$475~~$758 million and ~~$474~~$413 million, respectively. However, the only way the contract holder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account value of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account value is exhausted, the contract holder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account value can also fluctuate with equity market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account value.

For information on our variable annuity hedge program performance, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below.

For information on our estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets, interest rates and implied market volatilities, see our discussion in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Introduction – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Derivatives – GLB” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

For information about acquisitions and divestitures, see ~~Notes~~Note 3 ~~and 24~~ in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K and Note 3 herein.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Details underlying the consolidated results, deposits, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Net Income (Loss)
Income (loss) from operations:
Annuities	$	275		$	251		$	542		$	532		$	250		$	267
Retirement Plan Services		43			37			86			74			39			43
Life Insurance		150			133			294			263			157			144
Group Protection		45			35			74			42			55			29
Other Operations		(59	)		(37	)		(101	)		(51	)		(60	)		(42	)
Excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax		(41	)		(34	)		(69	)		(85	)		(316	)		(28	)
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, after-tax		-			-			(19	)		-
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of
debt, after-tax														-			(19	)
Benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax		7			26			(3	)		71			142			(10	)
Net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act		-			-			(13	)		-			-			(13	)
Acquisition and integration costs related to mergers
and acquisitions, after-tax		(35	)		-			(39	)		-
Acquisition and integration costs related to
mergers and acquisitions, after-tax														(15	)		(4	)
Net income (loss)	$	385		$	411		$	752		$	846		$	252		$	367



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Deposits
Annuities	$	2,983		$	1,991		$	5,509		$	4,008		$	3,508		$	2,526
Retirement Plan Services		2,217			1,978			4,577			4,229			2,496			2,360
Life Insurance		1,517			1,543			3,051			2,959			1,537			1,534
Total deposits	$	6,717		$	5,512		$	13,137		$	11,196		$	7,541		$	6,420

Net Flows
Annuities (1)	$	(126	)	$	(887	)	$	(732	)	$	(1,643	)
Retirement Plan Services (1)		499			421			962			562
Annuities													$	492		$	(606	)
Retirement Plan Services														(381	)		463
Life Insurance		1,084			1,101			2,160			2,025			1,020			1,076
Total net flows ~~(1)~~	$	1,457		$	635		$	2,390		$	944		$	1,131		$	933

⁽¹⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~

As of June 30,

2018

2017

Account Values

Annuities
$
136,556

$
131,029

Retirement Plan Services

69,183

62,568

Life Insurance

49,814

47,180

Total account values
$
255,553

$
240,777

	As of March 31,
	2019		2018
Account Values
Annuities	$	130,458	$	135,629
Retirement Plan Services		71,799		67,710
Life Insurance		51,120		49,281
Total account values	$	253,377	$	252,620

Comparison of the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

Net income decreased due primarily to the following:

~~Losses on variable annuity net derivatives results.~~

~~Acquisition and integration costs incurred~~Realized losses as ~~part of our recent acquisition and higher strategic digitization expense.~~compared to realized gains in 2018.

Less favorable investment income on alternative ~~investments and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.~~investments.

~~No amortization~~Higher acquisition and integration costs incurred as part of ~~deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance in 2018 as the gain was fully amortized during the second quarter of 2017.~~our acquisition.

The effect of the modified coinsurance (“Modco”) reinsurance transaction in the Annuities segment.

Spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields, partially offset by actions implemented to reduce interest crediting rates.

The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:

The inclusion of the results of the Liberty Group Business.

Growth in ~~average account values and~~ business in ~~force.~~force and group earned premiums.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt during 2018.

Lower federal income tax expense.

~~The acquisition of Liberty Life effective May 1, 2018~~

~~Additionally, when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2018 to 2017, the decrease in net income was also due to the loss on the early extinguishment of debt.~~

5350

RESULTS OF ANNUITIES

Income (Loss) from Operations

Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)	$	109	$	106	$	180	$	230	$	208	$	70
Fee income		587		553		1,173		1,086		568		586
Net investment income		244		263		493		519		257		249
Operating realized gain (loss) (2)		48		45		96		90		41		48
Amortization of deferred gain on
business sold through reinsurance										8		-
Other revenues (3)		118		109		238		213		92		120
Total operating revenues		1,106		1,076		2,180		2,138		1,174		1,073
Operating Expenses
Interest credited		144		145		291		292		162		148
Benefits (1)		183		174		329		366		284		145
Commissions and other expenses		457		447		925		890		441		467
Total operating expenses		784		766		1,545		1,548		887		760
Income (loss) from operations before taxes		322		310		635		590		287		313
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		47		59		93		58		37		46
Income (loss) from operations	$	275	$	251	$	542	$	532	$	250	$	267

⁽¹⁾

Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums.

⁽²⁾

See “Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking” below.

⁽³⁾

Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services that are subject to market ~~volatility.~~volatility and the net settlement related to the Modco reinsurance transaction.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

Income from operations for this segment ~~increased~~decreased due primarily to the following:

~~Higher fee income driven by higher average daily variable account values.~~Lower other revenues attributable to the Modco reinsurance transaction.

Lower ~~federal~~fee income ~~tax expense due to the change in the marginal corporate income tax rate as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”).~~driven by lower average daily variable account values.

~~The increase in income from operations was partially offset by the following:~~

Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by less favorable investment income on alternative investments within our surplus ~~portfolio and lower prepayments and bond make-whole premiums.~~

~~Higher commissions and other expenses due to higher average account values, resulting in higher trail commissions.~~portfolio.

~~Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 to 2017~~

~~Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to higher fee income driven by higher average daily variable account values.~~

The ~~increase~~decrease in income from operations was partially offset by the following:

~~Higher~~Lower commissions and other expenses due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in amortization expense as a result of ~~higher~~lower actual gross profits and ~~higher~~lower average variable account ~~values, resulting in higher trail commissions.~~values.

~~Lower net investment income, net~~Amortization of ~~interest credited, driven by spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields, less favorable investment income~~deferred gain on ~~alternative investments within our surplus portfolio and lower prepayments and bond make-whole premiums.~~business sold through reinsurance as a result of the Modco reinsurance transaction.

See “Additional Information” below for more information about the Modco reinsurance transaction.

Additional Information

Effective October 1, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Athene Holding Ltd. to reinsure approximately $7.7 billion of in-force fixed and fixed indexed annuity products on a Modco basis. The capital generated from this transaction was primarily used to fund the December 2018 accelerated share repurchase program of $450 million. We expect an ongoing reduction in income from operations in future periods as a result of this Modco reinsurance transaction. We continue to remain focused on the continued growth of both our fixed and variable annuity business. For additional information on our annuity reinsurance agreement and this accelerated share repurchase program, see Note 8 herein and “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities,” respectively, in our 2018 Form 10-K.

~~Higher federal income tax expense in 2018 (see “Additional Information” below for more information).~~

5451

~~Additional Information~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the federal income tax expense was primarily impacted by the lower marginal corporate income tax rate and tax law changes to the separate account dividends-received deduction (“DRD”) as a result of the Tax Act and other items. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the federal income tax expense was driven by one-time and run-rate adjustments primarily associated with our separate account DRD.

The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average account values were 8% and 9% for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017.~~respectively.

Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary crediting rates that are reset on an annual basis and are not subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Falling Rates” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Fee Income

Details underlying fee income, account values and net flows (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Fee Income
Mortality, expense and other assessments	$	581		$	546		$	1,159		$	1,072		$	562		$	579
Surrender charges		8			8			16			17			7			8
DFEL:
Deferrals		(10	)		(9	)		(19	)		(19	)		(10	)		(10	)
Amortization, net of interest		8			8			17			16			9			9
Total fee income	$	587		$	553		$	1,173		$	1,086		$	568		$	586

As of or For the Three

As of or For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Variable Account Value Information

Variable annuity deposits (1)
$
1,312

$
1,167

$
2,597

$
2,249

Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values:

Net flows (1)(2)

(1,094
)

(1,109
)

(2,327
)

(2,265
)
Change in market value (1)(2)

1,682

3,377

1,508

8,486

Contract holder assessments (1)

(619
)

(589
)

(1,236
)

(1,168
)
Transfers to the variable portion of variable annuity

products from the fixed portion of variable

annuity products

771

373

1,517

729

Variable annuity account values (1)

113,802

108,698

113,802

108,698

Average daily variable annuity account values (1)

114,076

107,988

114,869

106,760

Average daily S&P 500 (3)

2,704

2,396

2,718

2,360


	As of or For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Variable Account Value Information
Variable annuity deposits (1)	$	982		$	1,285
Increases (decreases) in variable annuity
account values:
Net flows (1)		(1,363	)		(1,233	)
Change in market value (1)		8,931			(174	)
Contract holder assessments (1)		(600	)		(618	)
Transfers to the variable portion
of variable annuity products
from the fixed portion of
variable annuity products		577			746
Variable annuity account values (1)		112,284			113,063
Average daily variable annuity account
values (1)		109,778			115,672
Average daily S&P 500 (2)		2,719			2,733

⁽¹⁾

Excludes the fixed portion of variable.

⁽²⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~

⁽³⁾

We generally use the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account values. The account values of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 index performance. See Note 89 for additional information.

We charge contract holders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily variable account values. Average daily variable account values are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a

contractual rate that is applied either to the account value or the guaranteed amount. ~~In addition, for our fixed annuity contracts and for some variable contracts, we~~We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity contract holders surrender their contracts during ~~their~~the surrender charge ~~periods~~period to protect us from premature withdrawals. Fee income includes charges on both our variable and fixed annuity products, but excludes the attributed fees on our GLB riders; see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Operating Realized Gain (Loss)” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for discussion of these attributed fees.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

Details underlying net investment income, interest credited, our interest rate spread and account values (in ~~millions, except spread data)~~millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate
and other, net of investment expenses	$	204		$	210		$	410		$	422
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)		7			11			11			16
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses													$	228		$	205
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums (1)														3			5
Surplus investments (2)		33			42			72			81			26			39
Total net investment income	$	244		$	263		$	493		$	519		$	257		$	249

Interest Credited
Amount provided to contract holders	$	147		$	142		$	297		$	284		$	164		$	150
DSI deferrals		(11	)		(3	)		(23	)		(5	)		(9	)		(11	)
Interest credited before DSI amortization		136			139			274			279			155			139
DSI amortization		8			6			17			13			7			9
Total interest credited	$	144		$	145		$	291		$	292		$	162		$	148

⁽¹⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.

⁽²⁾

Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.



	For the Three		For the Six		For the Three
	Months Ended		Months Ended		Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		March 31,
	2018	2017	2018	2017	2019	2018
Interest Rate Spread
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate
and other, net of investment expenses	3.84%	3.99%	3.85%	4.03%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums	0.13%	0.20%	0.11%	0.15%
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses					3.97%	3.87%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums					0.05%	0.08%
Net investment income yield on reserves	3.97%	4.19%	3.96%	4.18%	4.02%	3.95%
Interest rate credited to contract holders	2.23%	2.37%	2.27%	2.40%	2.41%	2.32%
Interest rate spread	1.74%	1.82%	1.69%	1.78%	1.61%	1.63%

5753



	As of or For the Three						As of or For the Six						As of or For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Fixed Account Value Information
Fixed annuity deposits (1)	$	1,671		$	824		$	2,912		$	1,759		$	2,526		$	1,240
Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values:
Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity
account values:
Net flows ~~(2)~~(1)		968			222			1,595			622			1,855			627
Contract holder assessments (1)		(9	)		(8	)		(17	)		(14	)		(9	)		(8	)
Transfers from the fixed portion of variable annuity
products to the variable portion of variable
Transfers from the fixed portion
of variable annuity products to
the variable portion of variable
annuity products		(771	)		(373	)		(1,517	)		(729	)		(577	)		(746	)
Reinvested interest credited (1)		195			192			293			434			428			98
Fixed annuity account values (1)		22,754			22,331			22,754			22,331			18,174			22,568
Average fixed account values (1)		22,665			22,333			22,663			22,230			17,407			22,617
Average invested assets on reserves		18,472			18,352			18,471			18,254			20,447			18,470

⁽¹⁾

Includes the fixed portion of variable.

⁽²⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~

A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our deferred fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.

Benefits

Benefits for this segment include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums, changes in benefit reserves and costs associated with the hedging of our benefit ratio unlocking on benefit reserves associated with our variable annuity guaranteed death benefit and GLB riders. For a corresponding offset of changes in income annuity reserves, see footnote 1 of “Income (Loss) from Operations” above.

5854

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions:
Deferrable	$	119		$	84		$	224		$	167		$	132		$	105
Non-deferrable		146			138			285			279			136			139
General and administrative expenses		99			106			202			206			104			103
Inter-segment reimbursement associated with reserve
financing and LOC expenses (1)		1			1			2			2
Inter-segment reimbursement associated
with reserve financing and
LOC expenses (1)														1			1
Taxes, licenses and fees		7			8			18			19			12			11
Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer		372			337			731			673
Total expenses incurred, excluding
broker-dealer														385			359
DAC deferrals		(134	)		(98	)		(254	)		(194	)		(147	)		(120	)
Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred,
excluding amortization, net of interest		238			239			477			479
DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest		104			99			216			200
Total pre-broker-dealer expenses
incurred, excluding amortization,
net of interest														238			239
DAC and VOBA amortization,
net of interest														90			111
Broker-dealer expenses incurred		115			109			232			211			113			117
Total commissions and other expenses	$	457		$	447		$	925		$	890
Total commissions and other
expenses													$	441		$	467

DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of sales/deposits		4.5%			4.9%			4.6%			4.8%			4.2%			4.8%

⁽¹⁾

Includes reimbursements to Annuities from the Life Insurance segment for reserve financing, net of expenses incurred by Annuities for its use of letters of credit (“LOCs”). The inter-segment amounts are not reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues.

5955

RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES

Income (Loss) from Operations

Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Operating Revenues
Fee income	$	64	$	62	$	129	$	121	$	61	$	64
Net investment income		222		224		444		441		226		222
Other revenues (1)		6		4		11		9		6		6
Total operating revenues		292		290		584		571		293		292
Operating Expenses
Interest credited		137		134		274		265		145		137
Benefits		-		-		1		1
Commissions and other expenses		104		106		210		207		105		107
Total operating expenses		241		240		485		473		250		244
Income (loss) from operations before taxes		51		50		99		98		43		48
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		8		13		13		24		4		5
Income (loss) from operations	$	43	$	37	$	86	$	74	$	39	$	43

⁽¹⁾

Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.

Comparison of the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

Income from operations for this segment ~~increased~~decreased due primarily to the following:

Lower ~~federal income tax expense due to the change in the marginal corporate income tax rate as a result of the Tax Act.~~

~~Higher fee income driven by higher average daily variable account values.~~

~~The increase in income from operations was partially offset by lower~~ net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by less favorable investment income on alternative investments ~~within our surplus portfolio, lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums~~ and spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields.

Lower fee income driven by lower average daily variable account values.

Additional Information

Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented on our platform and terminating over the course of the year.

New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused primarily by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account values were ~~10%~~16% and 11% for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~respectively, compared to 10% and 12% for the corresponding periods in 2017.~~respectively.

Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account values was ~~24%~~23% and ~~27%~~25% as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. Due to this expected overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.

Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Falling Rates” and “Part I ~~��~~– Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest

rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Fee Income

Details underlying fee income, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Fee Income
Annuity expense assessments	$	48	$	46	$	96	$	90	$	45	$	48
Mutual fund fees		16		16		32		31		16		16
Total expense assessments		64		62		128		121
Surrender charges		-		-		1		-
Total fee income	$	64	$	62	$	129	$	121	$	61	$	64



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Net Flows By Market ~~(1)~~
Small market	$	12		$	137		$	(67	)	$	(230	)	$	189		$	(79	)
Mid – large market		730			536			1,564			1,285			(283	)		834
Multi-Fund® and other		(243	)		(252	)		(535	)		(493	)		(287	)		(292	)
Total net flows	$	499		$	421		$	962		$	562		$	(381	)	$	463

⁽¹⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~



	As of or For the Three						As of or For the Six						As of or For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Variable Account Value Information
Variable annuity deposits (1)	$	456		$	460		$	919		$	918		$	458		$	463
Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values:
Net flows (1)(2)		(90	)		(80	)		(268	)		(634	)
Change in market value (1)(2)		396			464			348			1,219
Increases (decreases) in variable annuity
account values:
Net flows (1)														(130	)		(178	)
Change in market value (1)														1,640			(48	)
Contract holder assessments (1)		(40	)		(38	)		(80	)		(74	)		(37	)		(41	)
Variable annuity account values (1)		16,023			14,930			16,023			14,930			15,820			15,808
Average daily variable annuity account values (1)		16,052			14,797			16,166			14,638
Average daily variable annuity account
values (1)														15,393			16,282
Average daily S&P 500		2,704			2,396			2,718			2,360			2,719			2,733

⁽¹⁾

Excludes the fixed portion of variable.

⁽²⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~


	As of or For the Three				As of or For the Six				As of or For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019			2018
Mutual Fund Account Value Information
Mutual fund deposits	$	1,367	$	961	$	2,805	$	2,044	$	1,580		$	1,438
Mutual fund net flows		638		371		1,340		890		(189	)		702
Mutual fund account values (1)		34,114		29,225		34,114		29,225		36,065			33,046

⁽¹⁾

Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.

We charge expense assessments to cover insurance and administrative expenses. Expense assessments are generally equal to a percentage of the daily variable account values. Average daily account values are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Our expense assessments include fees we earn for the services that we provide to our mutual fund programs. ~~In addition, for both~~We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity ~~contracts, we collect surrender charges when~~ contract holders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge ~~periods~~period to protect us from premature withdrawals.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

Details underlying net investment income, interest credited, our interest rate spread and account values (in ~~millions, except spread data)~~millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate
and other, net of investment expenses	$	199	$	195	$	400	$	389
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)		6		8		10		12
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses									$	207	$	201
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums (1)										3		4
Surplus investments (2)		17		21		34		40		16		17
Total net investment income	$	222	$	224	$	444	$	441	$	226	$	222

Interest Credited	$	137	$	134	$	274	$	265	$	145	$	137

⁽¹⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.

⁽²⁾



	For the Three		For the Six		For the Three
	Months Ended		Months Ended		Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		March 31,
	2018	2017	2018	2017	2019	2018
Interest Rate Spread
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate
and other, net of investment expenses	4.25%	4.30%	4.27%	4.33%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums	0.12%	0.17%	0.10%	0.13%
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses					4.18%	4.28%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums					0.05%	0.09%
Net investment income yield on reserves	4.37%	4.47%	4.37%	4.46%	4.23%	4.37%
Interest rate credited to contract holders	2.90%	2.91%	2.90%	2.92%	2.92%	2.90%
Interest rate spread	1.47%	1.56%	1.47%	1.54%	1.31%	1.47%



	As of or For the Three						As of or For the Six						As of or For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Fixed Account Value Information
Fixed annuity deposits (1)	$	394		$	557		$	853		$	1,267		$	458		$	459
Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values:
Net flows (1)(2)		(49	)		130			(110	)		306
Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity
account values:
Net flows (1)														(61	)		(61	)
Reinvested interest credited (1)		138			133			273			269			142			135
Contract holder assessments (1)		(3	)		(2	)		(5	)		(5	)		(3	)		(3	)
Fixed annuity account values (1)		19,046			18,413			19,046			18,413			19,914			18,856
Average fixed account values (1)		18,929			18,302			18,860			18,143			19,841			18,789
Average invested assets on reserves		18,813			18,137			18,755			17,995			19,886			18,696

⁽¹⁾

Includes the fixed portion of variable.

⁽²⁾

~~The prior year has been restated to conform to the current year presentation, which has been modified to be consistent across our business segments.~~

A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed

annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.

~~Benefits~~

~~Benefits for this segment include changes in benefit reserves and our expected costs associated with purchases of derivatives used to hedge our benefit ratio unlocking.~~

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions:
Deferrable	$	2		$	2		$	3		$	6		$	2		$	1
Non-deferrable		19			17			37			32			17			18
General and administrative expenses		79			85			157			162			78			78
Taxes, licenses and fees		4			4			10			10			7			7
Total expenses incurred		104			108			207			210			104			104
DAC deferrals		(6	)		(8	)		(10	)		(15	)		(5	)		(4	)
Total expenses recognized before amortization		98			100			197			195
DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest		6			6			13			12
Total commissions and other expenses	$	104		$	106		$	210		$	207
Total expenses recognized before
amortization														99			100
DAC and VOBA amortization,
net of interest														6			7
Total commissions and other
expenses													$	105		$	107

DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits		0.7%			0.8%			0.6%			0.7%			0.5%			0.4%

Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred.

6359

RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE

Income (Loss) from Operations

Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)	$	205		$	199		$	401		$	384		$	213		$	196
Fee income		819			778			1,624			1,538			844			805
Net investment income		650			672			1,308			1,329			643			658
Operating realized gain (loss) (2)		(2	)		(3	)		(2	)		(7	)		(3	)		(1	)
Other revenues		8			9			9			16			3			2
Total operating revenues		1,680			1,655			3,340			3,260			1,700			1,660
Operating Expenses
Interest credited		351			349			705			698			354			354
Benefits		840			807			1,690			1,604			902			849
Commissions and other expenses		304			305			588			577			249			285
Total operating expenses		1,495			1,461			2,983			2,879			1,505			1,488
Income (loss) from operations before taxes		185			194			357			381			195			172
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		35			61			63			118			38			28
Income (loss) from operations	$	150		$	133		$	294		$	263		$	157		$	144

⁽¹⁾

Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.

⁽²⁾

See “Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking” below.

Comparison of the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:

Higher fee income due to growth in business in force.

Lower ~~federal income tax expense due to the change in the marginal corporate income tax rate as a result of the Tax Act.~~commissions and other expenses driven by lower margins and amortization rates.

The increase in income from operations was partially offset ~~by the following:~~by:

Higher benefits due to growth in business in ~~force.~~force, partially offset by more favorable mortality.

Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by less favorable investment income on alternative investments and spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio ~~yields and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.~~yields.

Strategies to Address Statutory Reserve Strain

Our insurance subsidiaries have statutory surplus and risk-based capital (“RBC”) levels above current regulatory required levels. Term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves calculated pursuant to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) and Actuarial Guideline 38 (“AG38”). For information on strategies we use to reduce the statutory reserve strain caused by XXX and AG38, see “Review of Consolidated Financial Condition – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Sources of Liquidity and Cash Flow – Insurance Subsidiaries’ Statutory Capital and Surplus” below.

Additional Information

During the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, we experienced favorable mortality ~~was in line~~ relative to our expectations for claims seasonality.

For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Falling Rates” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Insurance Premiums

Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and the level of business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality experience.

Fee Income

Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account values and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Fee Income
Cost of insurance assessments	$	521		$	493		$	1,038		$	983		$	565		$	516
Expense assessments		369			371			744			712			376			375
Surrender charges		13			14			23			28			13			9
DFEL:
Deferrals		(197	)		(187	)		(392	)		(345	)		(214	)		(194	)
Amortization, net of interest		113			87			211			160			104			99
Total fee income	$	819		$	778		$	1,624		$	1,538		$	844		$	805



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Sales by Product
UL	$	10		$	14		$	19		$	31		$	11		$	10
MoneyGuard®		57			80			115			139			51			56
IUL		14			16			28			34			16			14
VUL		46			50			104			86			52			58
Term		29			28			54			55			30			25
Total individual life sales		156			188			320			345			160			163
Executive Benefits		6			9			16			33			31			10
Total sales	$	162		$	197		$	336		$	378		$	191		$	173

Net Flows
Deposits	$	1,517		$	1,543		$	3,051		$	2,959		$	1,537		$	1,534
Withdrawals and deaths		(433	)		(442	)		(891	)		(934	)		(517	)		(458	)
Net flows	$	1,084		$	1,101		$	2,160		$	2,025		$	1,020		$	1,076

Contract Holder Assessments	$	1,197		$	1,160		$	2,395		$	2,281		$	1,236		$	1,198



	As of June 30,				As of March 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Account Values
General account	$	36,262	$	35,720	$	36,606	$	36,155
Separate account		13,552		11,460		14,514		13,126
Total account values	$	49,814	$	47,180	$	51,120	$	49,281

In-Force Face Amount
UL and other	$	341,663	$	337,971	$	346,292	$	340,862
Term insurance		388,475		366,628		416,789		384,154
Total in-force face amount	$	730,138	$	704,599	$	763,081	$	725,016

Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our contract holders’ account values. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account values. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality experience.

Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the year with the fourth quarter being our strongest.

Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:

MoneyGuard®, our linked-benefit product – 15% of total expected premium deposits;

UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;

Executive Benefits – single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits, and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received; and

Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.

We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

Details underlying net investment income, interest credited (in millions) and our interest rate spread were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate
and other, net of investment expenses	$	593	$	581	$	1,181	$	1,162
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)		8		14		15		20
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses									$	601	$	587
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums (1)										6		7
Alternative investments (2)		10		33		32		62		1		23
Surplus investments (3)		39		44		80		85		35		41
Total net investment income	$	650	$	672	$	1,308	$	1,329	$	643	$	658

Interest Credited	$	351	$	349	$	705	$	698	$	354	$	354

⁽¹⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.

⁽²⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.

⁽³⁾



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019	2018
Interest Rate Yields and Spread
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses	4.85%	4.98%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums	0.05%	0.06%
Alternative investments	0.01%	0.21%
Net investment income yield on reserves	4.91%	5.25%
Interest rate credited to contract holders (1)	3.69%	3.76%
Interest rate spread (1)	1.22%	1.49%

⁽¹⁾

Prior year interest rate spreads have been restated to conform to the current year presentation.

6662

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Interest Rate Yields and Spread

Attributable to interest-sensitive products:

Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate

and other, net of investment expenses
4.98%

5.05%

4.98%

5.08%

Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond

make-whole premiums
0.07%

0.12%

0.07%

0.09%

Alternative investments
0.09%

0.32%

0.14%

0.30%

Net investment income yield on reserves
5.14%

5.49%

5.19%

5.47%

Interest rate credited to contract holders
3.80%

3.82%

3.81%

3.83%

Interest rate spread
1.34%

1.67%

1.38%

1.64%



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Averages
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Invested assets on reserves	$	43,705	$	41,797	$	43,458	$	41,544	$	45,482	$	43,210
General account values		36,630		36,105		36,588		36,056		37,003		36,547

Attributable to traditional products:
Invested assets on reserves		4,125		4,384		4,106		4,359		4,150		4,088

A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to contract holder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account values because of the AG38 reserve requirements. Invested assets are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from AG38 reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of invested assets from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our contract holders’ accounts. We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves for traditional products. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.

Benefits

Details underlying benefits (dollars in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Benefits
Death claims direct and assumed	$	1,071		$	1,254		$	2,186		$	2,421		$	1,166		$	1,115
Death claims ceded		(424	)		(608	)		(830	)		(1,084	)		(427	)		(406	)
Reserves released on death		(145	)		(154	)		(311	)		(339	)		(166	)		(167	)
Net death benefits		502			492			1,045			998			573			542
Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product
reserves		160			168			325			335
Change in MoneyGuard® reserves		95			76			184			145
Change in secondary guarantee life
insurance product reserves:														139			165
Change in MoneyGuard® reserves:														105			89
Other benefits (1)		83			71			136			126			85			53
Total benefits	$	840		$	807		$	1,690		$	1,604		$	902		$	849

Death claims per $1,000 of in-force		2.76			2.81			2.88			2.86			3.04			3.00

⁽¹⁾

Includes primarily changes in reserves and dividends on traditional and other products.

Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee and linked-benefit life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing unlocking adjustments to these liabilities similar to DAC, VOBA and DFEL. Generally, we have higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. See “Future Contract Benefits and Other Contract Holder Funds” in Note 1 of our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for additional information.

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions	$	166		$	190		$	345		$	365		$	186		$	180
General and administrative expenses		131			146			264			283			141			133
Expenses associated with reserve financing		23			23			45			46			23			22
Taxes, licenses and fees		44			39			89			78			48			45
Total expenses incurred		364			398			743			772			398			380
DAC and VOBA deferrals		(193	)		(219	)		(397	)		(418	)		(220	)		(204	)
Total expenses recognized before amortization		171			179			346			354
DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest		132			125			240			221
Total expenses recognized before
amortization														178			176
DAC and VOBA amortization,
net of interest														70			108
Other intangible amortization		1			1			2			2			1			1
Total commissions and other expenses	$	304		$	305		$	588		$	577
Total commissions and
other expenses													$	249		$	285

DAC and VOBA Deferrals
As a percentage of sales		119.1%			111.2%			118.2%			110.6%			115.2%			117.9%

Commissions and costs that result directly from and are essential to successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and for our interest-sensitive products are generally amortized over the life of the contracts in relation to EGPs. For our traditional products, DAC and VOBA are amortized on either a straight-line basis or as a level percent of premium of the related

contracts, depending on the block of business. When comparing DAC and VOBA deferrals as a percentage of sales for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, to the corresponding ~~periods~~period in ~~2017,~~2018, the ~~increase~~decrease was primarily a result of changes in sales mix to products with ~~higher~~lower commission rates.

~~RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION~~Insurance Premiums

In60~~come (Loss) from Operations~~

Fee Income

Details underlying ~~the results for Group Protection~~fee income, sales, net flows, account values and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Fee Income
Cost of insurance assessments	$	565		$	516
Expense assessments		376			375
Surrender charges		13			9
DFEL:
Deferrals		(214	)		(194	)
Amortization, net of interest		104			99
Total fee income	$	844		$	805

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Operating Revenues

Insurance premiums
$
846

$
494

$
1,354

$
988

Net investment income

63

43

103

87

Other revenues (1)

28

4

33

7

Total operating revenues

937

541

1,490

1,082

Operating Expenses

Interest credited

1

-

2

1

Benefits

617

326

943

676

Commissions and other expenses

262

162

451

341

Total operating expenses

880

488

1,396

1,018

Income (loss) from operations before taxes

57

53

94

64

Federal income tax expense (benefit)

12

18

20

22

Income (loss) from operations
$
45

$
35

$
74

$
42



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Sales by Product
UL	$	11		$	10
MoneyGuard®		51			56
IUL		16			14
VUL		52			58
Term		30			25
Total individual life sales		160			163
Executive Benefits		31			10
Total sales	$	191		$	173

Net Flows
Deposits	$	1,537		$	1,534
Withdrawals and deaths		(517	)		(458	)
Net flows	$	1,020		$	1,076

Contract Holder Assessments	$	1,236		$	1,198



	As of March 31,
	2019		2018
Account Values
General account	$	36,606	$	36,155
Separate account		14,514		13,126
Total account values	$	51,120	$	49,281

In-Force Face Amount
UL and other	$	346,292	$	340,862
Term insurance		416,789		384,154
Total in-force face amount	$	763,081	$	725,016

Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:

MoneyGuard®, our linked-benefit product – 15% of total expected premium deposits;

UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;

Executive Benefits – single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits, and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received; and

Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

Details underlying net investment income, interest credited (in millions) and our interest rate spread were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses	$	601	$	587
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums (1)		6		7
Alternative investments (2)		1		23
Surplus investments (3)		35		41
Total net investment income	$	643	$	658

Interest Credited	$	354	$	354

⁽¹⁾

~~Consists of revenue from third-parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions~~See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and ~~other expenses.~~

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line

Life
$
28

$
15

$
37

$
12

Disability

20

20

41

30

Dental

(3
)

-

(5
)

-

Total non-medical

45

35

73

42

Medical

-

-

1

-

Income (loss) from operations
$
45

$
35

$
74

$
42

~~Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 to 2017~~

~~Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:~~

~~The acquisition of Liberty Life effective May 1, 2018 (see “Additional Information”~~Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for ~~more information).~~additional information.

·⁽²⁾

~~Lower federal~~See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.

⁽³⁾

Represents net investment income ~~tax expense due~~on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019	2018
Interest Rate Yields and Spread
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses	4.85%	4.98%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums	0.05%	0.06%
Alternative investments	0.01%	0.21%
Net investment income yield on reserves	4.91%	5.25%
Interest rate credited to contract holders (1)	3.69%	3.76%
Interest rate spread (1)	1.22%	1.49%

⁽¹⁾

Prior year interest rate spreads have been restated to conform to the ~~change in the marginal corporate income tax rate as a result of the Tax Act.~~current year presentation.

~~The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses due to higher strategic investments to enhance our customer experience and improve efficiency.~~

~~Additional Information~~

Income from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, includes two months of activity from Liberty Life due to the acquisition closing on May 1, 2018. The acquisition resulted in increases in all pre-tax line items presented in the table above. For more information about our acquisition, see Note 24 in our 2017 Form 10-K and Note 3 herein.

For information about the effect of the loss ratio sensitivity on our income (loss) from operations, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Group Protection – Additional Information” in our 2017 Form 10-K.

For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity” in our 2017 Form 10-K.

6962



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Averages
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Invested assets on reserves	$	45,482	$	43,210
General account values		37,003		36,547

Attributable to traditional products:
Invested assets on reserves		4,150		4,088

Benefits

Details underlying benefits (dollars in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Benefits
Death claims direct and assumed	$	1,166		$	1,115
Death claims ceded		(427	)		(406	)
Reserves released on death		(166	)		(167	)
Net death benefits		573			542
Change in secondary guarantee life
insurance product reserves:		139			165
Change in MoneyGuard® reserves:		105			89
Other benefits (1)		85			53
Total benefits	$	902		$	849

Death claims per $1,000 of in-force		3.04			3.00

⁽¹⁾

Includes primarily changes in reserves and dividends on traditional and other products.

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions	$	186		$	180
General and administrative expenses		141			133
Expenses associated with reserve financing		23			22
Taxes, licenses and fees		48			45
Total expenses incurred		398			380
DAC and VOBA deferrals		(220	)		(204	)
Total expenses recognized before
amortization		178			176
DAC and VOBA amortization,
net of interest		70			108
Other intangible amortization		1			1
Total commissions and
other expenses	$	249		$	285

DAC and VOBA Deferrals
As a percentage of sales		115.2%			117.9%

contracts, depending on the block of business. When comparing DAC and VOBA deferrals as a percentage of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2019, to the corresponding period in 2018, the decrease was primarily a result of changes in sales mix to products with lower commission rates.

Insurance Premiums

Fee Income

Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account values and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Fee Income
Cost of insurance assessments	$	565		$	516
Expense assessments		376			375
Surrender charges		13			9
DFEL:
Deferrals		(214	)		(194	)
Amortization, net of interest		104			99
Total fee income	$	844		$	805



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Sales by Product
UL	$	11		$	10
MoneyGuard®		51			56
IUL		16			14
VUL		52			58
Term		30			25
Total individual life sales		160			163
Executive Benefits		31			10
Total sales	$	191		$	173

Net Flows
Deposits	$	1,537		$	1,534
Withdrawals and deaths		(517	)		(458	)
Net flows	$	1,020		$	1,076

Contract Holder Assessments	$	1,236		$	1,198



	As of March 31,
	2019		2018
Account Values
General account	$	36,606	$	36,155
Separate account		14,514		13,126
Total account values	$	51,120	$	49,281

In-Force Face Amount
UL and other	$	346,292	$	340,862
Term insurance		416,789		384,154
Total in-force face amount	$	763,081	$	725,016

Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:

MoneyGuard®, our linked-benefit product – 15% of total expected premium deposits;

UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;

Executive Benefits – single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits, and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received; and

Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

Details underlying net investment income, interest credited (in millions) and our interest rate spread were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses	$	601	$	587
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums (1)		6		7
Alternative investments (2)		1		23
Surplus investments (3)		35		41
Total net investment income	$	643	$	658

Interest Credited	$	354	$	354

⁽¹⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.

⁽²⁾

See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.

⁽³⁾



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019	2018
Interest Rate Yields and Spread
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans
on real estate and other, net of
investment expenses	4.85%	4.98%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums	0.05%	0.06%
Alternative investments	0.01%	0.21%
Net investment income yield on reserves	4.91%	5.25%
Interest rate credited to contract holders (1)	3.69%	3.76%
Interest rate spread (1)	1.22%	1.49%

⁽¹⁾

Prior year interest rate spreads have been restated to conform to the current year presentation.



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Averages
Attributable to interest-sensitive products:
Invested assets on reserves	$	45,482	$	43,210
General account values		37,003		36,547

Attributable to traditional products:
Invested assets on reserves		4,150		4,088

Benefits

Details underlying benefits (dollars in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Benefits
Death claims direct and assumed	$	1,166		$	1,115
Death claims ceded		(427	)		(406	)
Reserves released on death		(166	)		(167	)
Net death benefits		573			542
Change in secondary guarantee life
insurance product reserves:		139			165
Change in MoneyGuard® reserves:		105			89
Other benefits (1)		85			53
Total benefits	$	902		$	849

Death claims per $1,000 of in-force		3.04			3.00

⁽¹⁾

Includes primarily changes in reserves and dividends on traditional and other products.

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions	$	186		$	180
General and administrative expenses		141			133
Expenses associated with reserve financing		23			22
Taxes, licenses and fees		48			45
Total expenses incurred		398			380
DAC and VOBA deferrals		(220	)		(204	)
Total expenses recognized before
amortization		178			176
DAC and VOBA amortization,
net of interest		70			108
Other intangible amortization		1			1
Total commissions and
other expenses	$	249		$	285

DAC and VOBA Deferrals
As a percentage of sales		115.2%			117.9%

RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION

Income (Loss) from Operations

Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums	$	1,023	$	508
Net investment income		74		40
Other revenues (1)		41		5
Total operating revenues		1,138		553
Operating Expenses
Interest credited		1		1
Benefits		753		326	��
Commissions and other expenses		314		189
Total operating expenses		1,068		516
Income (loss) from operations before taxes		70		37
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		15		8
Income (loss) from operations	$	55	$	29

⁽¹⁾

Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019			2018
Income (Loss) from Operations by
Product Line
Life	$	2		$	10
Disability		54			22
Dental		(1	)		(3	)
Income (loss) from operations	$	55		$	29

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 to 2018

Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the inclusion of the results of the Liberty Group Business (see “Additional Information” below for more information).

Additional Information

Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019, includes activity from the Liberty Group Business acquired on May 1, 2018. The acquisition resulted in increases in all pre-tax line items presented in the Income (Loss) from Operations table above. For more information about our acquisition, see Note 3 in our 2018 Form 10-K and Note 3 herein.

Insurance Premiums

Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Insurance Premiums by Product Line
Life	$	307	$	206	$	510	$	412	$	371	$	202
Disability		464		226		696		451		577		233
Dental		75		62		148		125		75		73
Total insurance premiums	$	846	$	494	$	1,354	$	988	$	1,023	$	508

Sales by Product Line
Life	$	31	$	28	$	53	$	51	$	64	$	23
Disability		38		32		59		55		42		21
Dental		25		28		37		39		13		11
Total sales	$	94	$	88	$	149	$	145	$	119	$	55

Our cost of insurance and policy administration charges are embedded in the premiums charged to our customers. The premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.

Sales relate to new contract holders and new programs sold to existing contract holders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products.

Net Investment Income

We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our invested assets.

Benefits and Interest Credited

Details underlying benefits and interest credited (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:



��	For the Three				For the Six
	Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		For the Three
Benefits and Interest Credited by Product Line
									Months Ended
									March 31,
									2019		2018
Benefits and Interest Credited by
Product Line
Life	$	209	$	136	$	337	$	285	$	265	$	128
Disability		354		147		498		303		435		145
Dental		55		43		110		89		54		54
Total benefits and interest credited	$	618	$	326	$	945	$	677	$	754	$	327

Loss Ratios by Product Line
Life		68.0%		66.1%		66.1%		69.3%		71.4%		63.2%
Disability		76.4%		65.4%		71.6%		67.1%		75.4%		61.9%
Dental		73.4%		68.7%		74.0%		71.0%		72.2%		74.7%
Total		73.1%		66.1%		69.8%		68.5%		73.7%		64.3%

Generally, we ~~have~~experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. When comparing our life and disability loss ratios for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the increase in 2019 was driven primarily by the inclusion of the Liberty Group Business as we combined two blocks of business with different loss characteristics.

Commissions and Other Expenses

Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions	$	83		$	62		$	149		$	125		$	92		$	66
General and administrative expenses		152			86			241			169			173			89
Taxes, licenses and fees		24			13			40			27			30			16
Total expenses incurred		259			161			430			321			295			171
DAC deferrals		(17	)		(13	)		(30	)		(27	)		(23	)		(13	)
Total expenses recognized before amortization		242			148			400			294
DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest		19			14			50			47
Other intangible amortization		1			-			1			-
Total commissions and other expenses	$	262		$	162		$	451		$	341
Total expenses recognized before
amortization														272			158
DAC and VOBA amortization, net of
interest (1)														36			31
Other intangible amortization (1)														6			-
Total commissions and
other expenses													$	314		$	189

DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of insurance premiums		2.0%			2.6%			2.2%			2.7%			2.2%			2.6%

⁽¹⁾

See Note 3 in our 2018 Form 10-K for information regarding intangible assets acquired as part of the Liberty Life acquisition.

Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized as a level percent of insurance premiums of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Generally, we have higher amortization in the first quarter of the year due to a significant number of policies renewing in the quarter. When comparing DAC deferrals as a percentage of insurance premiums for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the decrease was driven by a change in our sales mix to products with lower commission rates as a result of the inclusion of the Liberty Group Business acquired on May 1, 2018.

7166

RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS

Income (Loss) from Operations

Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)	$	5		$	2		$	8		$	5		$	2		$	3
Net investment income		53			60			117			123			51			64
Amortization of deferred gain on
business sold through reinsurance		-			4			-			21
Other revenues		-			1			-			6			4			-
Total operating revenues		58			67			125			155			57			67
Operating Expenses
Interest credited		14			18			29			36			15			15
Benefits		28			27			47			54			20			19
Other expenses		7			8			16			18			24			8
Interest and debt expense		68			63			136			127			71			68
Strategic digitization expense		16			14			31			23			15			15
Total operating expenses		133			130			259			258			145			125
Income (loss) from operations before taxes		(75	)		(63	)		(134	)		(103	)		(88	)		(58	)
Federal income tax expense (benefit)		(16	)		(26	)		(33	)		(52	)		(28	)		(16	)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(59	)	$	(37	)	$	(101	)	$	(51	)	$	(60	)	$	(42	)

⁽¹⁾

Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.

Comparison of the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

Loss from operations for Other Operations increased due primarily to the following:

~~Less favorable federal income tax benefit~~Higher other expenses due to the ~~change~~effect of changes in our stock price on our deferred compensation plans, as our stock price significantly increased during the ~~marginal corporate income tax rate as~~first quarter of 2019 compared to a ~~result~~decrease during the first quarter of ~~the Tax Act.~~2018.

~~No amortization~~Lower net investment income, net of ~~deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance~~interest credited, related to lower average invested assets driven by a decline in ~~2018 as the gain was fully amortized during the second quarter of 2017.~~excess capital retained by Other Operations.

The increase in loss from operations was partially offset by more favorable federal income tax benefits driven by excess tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation.

~~Higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in the average balance of outstanding debt.~~

~~Higher strategic digitization expense as part of our strategic digitization initiative.~~

Additional Information

For information on our strategic digitization initiative, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Strategic Digitization Initiative” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Net Investment Income and Interest Credited

We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.

Write-downs for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) decrease the recorded value of our invested assets owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of invested assets between the business segments and Other Operations.

The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in our consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for

this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest

earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.

Benefits

Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.

Other Expenses

Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
General and administrative expenses:
Legal	$	-		$	-		$	1		$	-		$	-		$	1
Branding		11			12			19			17			9			8
Other (1)		2			1			7			11			16			4
Total general and administrative expenses		13			13			27			28			25			13
Taxes, licenses and fees(2)		(3	)		(2	)		(5	)		(4	)		2			(2	)
Inter-segment reimbursement associated with reserve
financing and LOC expenses (2)		(3	)		(3	)		(6	)		(6	)
Inter-segment reimbursement associated
with reserve financing and
LOC expenses (3)														(3	)		(3	)
Total other expenses	$	7		$	8		$	16		$	18		$	24		$	8

⁽¹⁾

Includes expenses that are corporate in nature including charitable contributions, the portion of our deferred compensation plan expense attributable to participants’ selection of LNC stock as the measure for their investment return and other expenses not allocated to our business segments.

⁽²⁾

Includes state guaranty funds assessments to cover losses to contract holders of insolvent or rehabilitated insurance companies. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states.

⁽³⁾

Consists of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its use of LOCs.

Interest and Debt Expense

Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash, the availability of funds from our inter-company cash management program and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Review of Consolidated Financial Condition – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Sources of Liquidity and Cash Flow – Financing Activities” below.

7368

REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) AND BENEFIT RATIO UNLOCKING

Details underlying realized gain (loss), after-DAC(1) and benefit ratio unlocking (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Components of Realized Gain (Loss), Pre-Tax	Components of Realized Gain (Loss), Pre-Tax												Components of Realized Gain (Loss), Pre-Tax
Total operating realized gain (loss)	$	46		$	42		$	94		$	83		$	38		$	47
Total excluded realized gain (loss)		(53	)		(52	)		(89	)		(132	)		(400	)		(35	)
Total realized gain (loss), pre-tax	$	(7	)	$	(10	)	$	5		$	(49	)	$	(362	)	$	12

Reconciliation of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)	Reconciliation of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)												Reconciliation of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)
Net of Benefit Ratio Unlocking, After-Tax
Total excluded realized gain (loss)	$	(41	)	$	(34	)	$	(69	)	$	(85	)	$	(316	)	$	(28	)
Benefit ratio unlocking		7			26			(3	)		71			142			(10	)
Excluded realized gain (loss) net of benefit
ratio unlocking, after-tax	$	(34	)	$	(8	)	$	(72	)	$	(14	)	$	(174	)	$	(38	)

Components of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)	Components of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)												Components of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss)
Net of Benefit Ratio Unlocking, After-Tax
Realized gain (loss) related to certain investments	$	(10	)	$	(12	)	$	(27	)	$	(20	)	$	(16	)	$	(17	)
Gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments(2)		19			(1	)		21			5			(94	)		2
Variable annuity net derivatives results:
Hedge program performance, including unlocking	Hedge program performance, including unlocking												Hedge program performance, including unlocking
for GLB reserves hedged		(42	)		17			(67	)		27			(15	)		(25	)
GLB NPR component		2			(8	)		7			(18	)		(27	)		5
Total variable annuity net derivatives results		(40	)		9			(60	)		9			(42	)		(20	)
Indexed annuity forward-starting option		(3	)		(4	)		(6	)		(8	)		(22	)		(3	)
Excluded realized gain (loss) net of benefit
ratio unlocking, after-tax	$	(34	)	$	(8	)	$	(72	)	$	(14	)	$	(174	)	$	(38	)

⁽¹⁾

DAC refers to the associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds and funds withheld reinsurance assets and liabilities.

⁽²⁾

As of March 31, 2019, the Modco investment portfolio consisted primarily of fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivatives related to the Modco investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). We expect the Modco investments classified as AFS will be sold and replaced with securities classified as trading securities, with changes in fair value recorded in realized gain (loss), consistent with the recorded fair value changes in the Modco embedded derivatives. See Note 8 for more information.

Comparison of the Three ~~and Six~~ Months Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 to 2018 ~~to 2017~~

We had higher realized losses due primarily to the following:

Losses due primarily to unfavorable changes in the fair value of embedded derivatives related to certain Modco arrangements.

Unfavorable variable annuity net derivatives results attributable to unfavorable ~~hedge program performance due to more volatile capital markets, partially offset by favorable~~ GLB non-performance risk (“NPR”) component due to ~~widening~~a narrowing of our credit ~~spread.~~spread and a decrease in our associated reserves, partially offset by favorable hedge program performance due to less volatile capital markets.

~~The higher realized losses were partially offset by gains on the mark-to-market on certain instruments due to an increase in interest rates.~~

~~The above components of excluded realized gain (loss) are described net of benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax.~~

Operating Realized Gain (Loss)

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Operating Realized Gain (Loss)” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of our operating realized gain (loss).

Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Investments

See “Consolidated Investments – Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Investments” below.

Gain (Loss) on the Mark-to-Market on Certain Instruments

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Gain (Loss) on the Mark-to-Market on Certain Instruments” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of the mark-to-market on certain instruments and Note 4 for information about consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”).

Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of our variable annuity net derivatives results and how our NPR adjustment is determined.

Details underlying our variable annuity hedging program (dollars in millions) were as follows:


		As of				As of				As of				As of				As of				As of				As of				As of				As of				As of
	June 30,				March 31,				December 31,				September 30,				June 30,				March 31,				December 31,				September 30,				June 30,				March 31,
		2018				2018				2017				2017				2017				2019				2018				2018				2018				2018
Variable annuity hedge program assets (liabilities)		$	1,094			$	1,194			$	1,307			$	1,526			$	1,766			$	1,967			$	2,357			$	770			$	1,094			$	1,194

Variable annuity reserves – asset (liability):
Embedded derivative reserves, pre-NPR (1)		$	1,288			$	1,179			$	1,029			$	743			$	480			$	578			$	252			$	1,630			$	1,288			$	1,179
NPR			(131	)			(135	)			(142	)			(127	)			(97	)			(98	)			(57	)			(140	)			(131	)			(135	)
Embedded derivative reserves			1,157				1,044				887				616				383				480				195				1,490				1,157				1,044
Insurance benefit reserves			(781	)			(734	)			(665	)			(656	)			(649	)			(916	)			(1,060	)			(757	)			(781	)			(734	)
Total variable annuity reserves – asset (liability)		$	376			$	310			$	222			$	(40	)		$	(266	)		$	(436	)		$	(865	)		$	733			$	376			$	310

10-year credit default swap ("CDS") spread			1.24%				1.19%				1.05%				1.08%				1.30%
10-year credit default swap (“CDS”) spread																							1.43%				1.67%				1.35%				1.24%				1.19%
NPR factor related to 10-year CDS spread			0.18%				0.18%				0.14%				0.15%				0.18%				0.18%				0.25%				0.18%				0.18%				0.18%

⁽¹⁾

Embedded derivative reserves in an asset (liability) position indicate that we estimate the present value of future benefits to be less (greater) than the present value of future net valuation premiums.

For information about the effect of changes in the NPR factor on our net income (loss), see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Derivatives – GLB” above for additional information about our guaranteed benefits.

Indexed Annuity Forward-Starting Option

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Realized Gain (Loss) and Benefit Ratio Unlocking – Indexed Annuity Forward-Starting Option” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of our indexed annuity forward-starting option.

7570

CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS

Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:



								Percentage of										Percentage of
								Total Investments										Total Investments
		As of			As of			As of		As of		As of			As of			As of		As of
	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,		December 31,		March 31,			December 31,			March 31,		December 31,
		2018			2017			2018		2017		2019			2018			2019		2018
Investments
AFS securities:
Fixed maturity		$	93,060		$	94,840		83.1%		83.9%
Equity			-			246		0.0%		0.2%
Total AFS securities			93,060			95,086		83.1%		84.1%
Fixed maturity AFS securities												$	98,050		$	94,024		80.5%		81.6%
Trading securities			1,450			1,620		1.3%		1.4%			3,314			1,950		2.7%		1.7%
Equity securities			112			-		0.1%		0.0%			153			99		0.1%		0.1%
Mortgage loans on real estate			12,217			10,762		10.9%		9.5%			13,997			13,260		11.5%		11.5%
Real estate			11			11		0.0%		0.0%			12			12		0.0%		0.0%
Policy loans			2,508			2,399		2.2%		2.1%			2,498			2,509		2.1%		2.2%
Derivative investments			584			915		0.5%		0.8%			981			1,107		0.8%		1.0%
Alternative investments			1,572			1,459		1.4%		1.3%			1,858			1,725		1.6%		1.4%
Other investments			493			837		0.5%		0.8%			882			530		0.7%		0.5%
Total investments		$	112,007		$	113,089		100.0%		100.0%		$	121,745		$	115,216		100.0%		100.0%

Investment Objective

Invested assets are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

��

Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification

Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly-owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.

We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.

7671

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios

We adopted Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, in 2018 that resulted in a new classification and measurement of our equity securities. See Note 2 for additional information. Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as ~~AFS~~available-for-sale (“AFS”) and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 5; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 5.



	As of June 30, 2018										As of March 31, 2019
			Gross Unrealized							%			Gross Unrealized							%
	Amortized				Losses and			Fair		Fair	Amortized				Losses and			Fair		Fair
	Cost		Gains		OTTI (1)			Value		Value	Cost		Gains		OTTI (1)			Value		Value
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
Industry corporate bonds:
Financial services	$	12,897		530	$	260		$	13,167	14.1%	$	14,107	$	794	$	118		$	14,783	15.1%
Basic industry		4,971		191		95			5,067	5.5%		4,562		248		59			4,751	4.8%
Capital goods		6,470		293		126			6,637	7.1%		6,446		379		70			6,755	6.9%
Communications		4,553		210		114			4,649	5.0%		4,598		339		48			4,889	5.0%
Consumer cyclical		5,604		214		134			5,684	6.1%		5,349		266		64			5,551	5.6%
Consumer non-cyclical		13,772		648		340			14,080	15.1%		14,198		825		227			14,796	15.1%
Energy		6,472		296		135			6,633	7.1%		6,238		378		76			6,540	6.7%
Technology		3,709		92		51			3,750	4.0%		3,750		166		15			3,901	4.0%
Transportation		3,065		106		79			3,092	3.3%		3,242		147		37			3,352	3.4%
Industrial other		1,164		27		26			1,165	1.3%		1,310		44		13			1,341	1.4%
Utilities		12,956		835		165			13,626	14.7%		13,345		1,038		87			14,296	14.6%
Government related entities		2,376		163		48			2,491	2.7%		2,098		189		34			2,253	2.3%
Collateralized mortgage and other obligations ("CMOs"):
Agency backed		1,658		47		71			1,634	1.8%		1,794		68		38			1,824	1.9%
Non-agency backed		803		52		(21	)		876	0.9%		717		49		(17	)		783	0.8%
Mortgage pass through securities ("MPTS"):
Agency backed		856		20		12			864	0.9%		785		25		3			807	0.8%
Commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"):
Agency backed		22		-		-			22	0.0%		20		-		-			20	0.0%
Non-agency backed		737		5		17			725	0.8%		848		16		(1	)		865	0.9%
Asset-backed securities ("ABS"):
Collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs")		1,107		-		7			1,100	1.2%		2,431		4		11			2,424	2.5%
Commercial real estate ("CRE")
collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”)		14		-		(5	)		19	0.0%
collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs")												8		-		(5	)		13	0.0%
Credit card		78		17		1			94	0.1%		78		18		1			95	0.1%
Equipment receivables		38		-		-			38	0.1%		34		1		-			35	0.0%
Home equity		548		21		(13	)		582	0.6%		492		17		(13	)		522	0.5%
Manufactured housing		16		1		-			17	0.0%		10		-		-			10	0.0%
Student loans		39		-		-			39	0.0%		37		-		-			37	0.0%
Other		245		5		2			248	0.3%		339		10		1			348	0.4%
Municipals:
Taxable		4,394		745		14			5,125	5.5%		4,585		879		8			5,456	5.6%
Tax-exempt		115		8		-			123	0.1%		102		11		-			113	0.1%
Government:
United States		396		29		3			422	0.5%		387		37		1			423	0.4%
Foreign		430		41		-			471	0.5%		403		50		-			453	0.5%
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities		578		65		23			620	0.7%		581		57		24			614	0.6%
Total AFS securities		90,083		4,661		1,684			93,060	100.0%
Total fixed maturity AFS securities												92,894		6,055		899			98,050	100.0%
Trading Securities (2)		1,304		154		8			1,450			3,115		205		6			3,314
Equity Securities		110		4		2			112			164		1		12			153
Total AFS, trading and equity securities	$	91,497	$	4,819	$	1,694		$	94,622
Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities											$	96,173	$	6,261	$	917		$	101,517

7772



	As of December 31, 2017										As of December 31, 2018
			Gross Unrealized							%			Gross Unrealized							%
	Amortized				Losses and			Fair		Fair	Amortized				Losses and			Fair		Fair
	Cost		Gains		OTTI (1)			Value		Value	Cost		Gains		OTTI (1)			Value		Value
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
Industry corporate bonds:
Financial services	$	12,059	$	1,061	$	36		$	13,084	13.8%	$	13,762	$	465	$	352		$	13,875	14.8%
Basic industry		4,855		413		14			5,254	5.5%		4,542		137		152			4,527	4.8%
Capital goods		6,270		547		24			6,793	7.2%		6,531		236		182			6,585	7.0%
Communications		4,151		406		21			4,536	4.8%		4,686		210		133			4,763	5.1%
Consumer cyclical		5,649		444		28			6,065	6.4%		5,475		160		180			5,455	5.8%
Consumer non-cyclical		13,680		1,242		74			14,848	15.7%		14,307		543		507			14,343	15.3%
Energy		6,557		535		85			7,007	7.4%		6,383		217		227			6,373	6.8%
Technology		3,443		218		9			3,652	3.9%		3,698		64		81			3,681	3.9%
Transportation		2,927		220		7			3,140	3.3%		3,289		91		99			3,281	3.5%
Industrial other		979		49		7			1,021	1.1%		1,328		24		30			1,322	1.4%
Utilities		12,786		1,480		22			14,244	15.0%		13,330		692		249			13,773	14.6%
Government related entities		2,345		247		20			2,572	2.7%		2,292		141		63			2,370	2.5%
CMOs:
Agency backed		1,598		68		33			1,633	1.7%		1,747		52		56			1,743	1.9%
Non-agency backed		880		53		(21	)		954	1.0%		732		48		(13	)		793	0.8%
MPTS:
Agency backed		849		34		5			878	0.9%		829		18		10			837	0.9%
CMBS:
Agency backed		22		-		-			22	0.0%		20		-		-			20	0.0%
Non-agency backed		568		10		-			578	0.6%		791		6		13			784	0.8%
ABS:
CLOs		789		2		2			789	0.8%		1,738		3		24			1,717	1.8%
CRE CDOs		14		-		(5	)		19	0.0%		8		-		(5	)		13	0.0%
Credit card		77		21		1			97	0.1%		78		16		-			94	0.1%
Equipment receivables		40		-		-			40	0.0%		37		1		-			38	0.0%
Home equity		587		22		(21	)		630	0.7%		508		17		(9	)		534	0.6%
Manufactured housing		17		1		-			18	0.0%		15		1		-			16	0.0%
Student loans												38		-		-			38	0.0%
Other		182		7		-			189	0.2%		240		7		1			246	0.3%
Municipals:
Taxable		4,009		937		6			4,940	5.2%		4,551		711		18			5,244	5.6%
Tax-exempt		163		16		-			179	0.2%		96		5		-			101	0.1%
Government:
United States		527		41		1			567	0.6%		390		29		2			417	0.5%
Foreign		395		56		-			451	0.5%		406		42		-			448	0.5%
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities		575		87		22			640	0.7%		582		45		34			593	0.6%
Total fixed maturity AFS securities		86,993		8,217		370			94,840	100.0%		92,429		3,981		2,386			94,024	100.0%
Equity AFS Securities		247		16		17			246
Total AFS securities		87,240		8,233		387			95,086
Trading Securities (2)		1,425		203		8			1,620			1,823		137		10			1,950
Total AFS and trading securities	$	88,665	$	8,436	$	395		$	96,706
Equity Securities												116		1		18			99
Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities											$	94,368	$	4,119	$	2,414		$	96,073

⁽¹⁾

Includes unrealized (gains) and losses on ~~impaired~~credit-impaired securities related to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.

⁽²⁾

Certain of our trading securities support our ~~modified coinsurance arrangements (“Modco”),~~Modco reinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. Refer to “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Consolidated Investments – Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios – Trading Securities” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for further details.

7873

Fixed Maturity AFS Securities

In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized, and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to the balances of DAC, VOBA, DFEL, future contract benefits, other contract holder funds and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For instance, DAC is adjusted upon the recognition of unrealized gains or losses because the amortization of DAC is based upon an assumed emergence of gross profits on certain insurance business. Deferred income tax balances are also adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.

The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:



		Rating Agency	As of June 30, 2018					As of December 31, 2017						Rating Agency	As of March 31, 2019					As of December 31, 2018
NAIC		Equivalent	Amortized		Fair		% of	Amortized		Fair		% of		Equivalent	Amortized		Fair		% of	Amortized		Fair		% of
Designation (1)		Designation (1)	Cost		Value		Total	Cost		Value		Total		Designation (1)	Cost		Value		Total	Cost		Value		Total

Investment Grade Securities	Investment Grade Securities												Investment Grade Securities
1		AAA / AA / A	$	48,107	$	50,589	54.4%	$	46,455	$	51,494	54.3%		AAA / AA / A	$	49,876	$	53,751	54.8%	$	49,086	$	51,118	54.4%
2		BBB		38,301		38,911	41.8%		36,703		39,518	41.7%		BBB		39,425		40,793	41.6%		39,872		39,641	42.1%
Total investment grade securities	Total investment grade securities			86,408		89,500	96.2%		83,158		91,012	96.0%	Total investment grade securities			89,301		94,544	96.4%		88,958		90,759	96.5%

Below Investment Grade Securities	Below Investment Grade Securities												Below Investment Grade Securities
3		BB		2,653		2,614	2.8%		2,785		2,840	3.0%		BB		2,602		2,581	2.6%		2,565		2,448	2.6%
4		B		901		846	0.9%		768		743	0.8%		B		761		722	0.7%		803		741	0.8%
5		CCC and lower		112		85	0.1%		271		229	0.2%		CCC and lower		174		152	0.2%		95		63	0.1%
6		In or near default		9		15	0.0%		11		16	0.0%		In or near default		56		51	0.1%		8		13	0.0%
Total below investment grade securities	Total below investment grade securities			3,675		3,560	3.8%		3,835		3,828	4.0%	Total below investment grade securities			3,593		3,506	3.6%		3,471		3,265	3.5%
Total fixed maturity AFS securities	Total fixed maturity AFS securities		$	90,083	$	93,060	100.0%	$	86,993	$	94,840	100.0%	Total fixed maturity AFS securities		$	92,894	$	98,050	100.0%	$	92,429	$	94,024	100.0%

Total securities below investment	Total securities below investment												Total securities below investment
grade as a percentage of total	grade as a percentage of total												grade as a percentage of total
fixed maturity AFS securities	fixed maturity AFS securities			4.1%		3.8%			4.4%		4.0%		fixed maturity AFS securities			3.9%		3.6%			3.8%		3.5%

⁽¹⁾

Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second ~~highest~~lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings. The average credit quality was A- as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

Comparisons between the NAIC ratings and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality ratings and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC ratings are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC ratings 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities rated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC ratings 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, 92% and 95% ~~and 88%~~, respectively, of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. Our gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”), on fixed maturity AFS securities as of ~~June 30, 2018, increased~~March 31, 2019, decreased by ~~$1.3~~$1.5 billion since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. As more fully described in Note 1 in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K, we regularly review our investment holdings for OTTI. We believe the unrealized loss position as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, does not represent OTTI as: (i) we do not intend to sell the debt securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the estimated future cash flows are equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis of the debt securities. For further information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.

7974

In our evaluation of OTTI, we concluded: (i) that it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (ii) that the estimated future cash flows are equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis of the debt securities. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considers the following as part of the evaluation:

The current economic environment and market conditions;

Our business strategy and current business plans;

The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;

Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;

The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts;

The capital risk limits approved by management; and

Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.

To determine the recoverability of a debt security, we consider the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:

Historical and implied volatility of the security;

Length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;

Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;

Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and

Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.

As reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had ~~$113.8~~$123.3 billion of investments and cash, which exceeded the liabilities for our future obligations under insurance policies and contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers, which totaled ~~$104.4~~$110.3 billion as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of ~~$55.3~~$75.6 billion as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business.

See ~~“AFS~~“Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 51 in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K and Note 5 herein for additional discussion.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was ~~$15.2~~$16.0 billion and $15.3 billion, respectively, representing ~~14% and~~ 13%~~, respectively,~~ of total invested assets.

Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Consolidated Investments – Mortgage-Backed Securities” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of our mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”).

Our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of ~~$4.0~~$4.1 billion and a net unrealized gain of ~~$93~~$151 million as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

8075

The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was ~~$486~~$441 million and represented ~~approximately~~less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented ~~$480~~$425 million, or ~~99%~~96%, and trading securities represented $6$16 million, or 1%4%, of the subprime exposure as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of ~~June 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:



																	Subprime/																									Subprime/
		Agency					Prime					Alt-A					Option ARM (1)					Total					Agency					Prime					Alt-A					Option ARM (1)					Total

		Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized			Fair		Amortized
		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost		Value			Cost
Type	Type
RMBS	RMBS	$	2,491		$	2,506	$	285		$	265	$	259		$	239	$	339		$	307	$	3,374		$	3,317	$	2,632		$	2,579	$	260		$	243	$	225		$	207	$	297		$	267	$	3,414		$	3,296
ABS home equity	ABS home equity		1			2		57			54		104			97		420			395		582			548		1			1		54			53		90			85		377			353		522			492
Total by type (2)(3)	Total by type (2)(3)	$	2,492		$	2,508	$	342		$	319	$	363		$	336	$	759		$	702	$	3,956		$	3,865	$	2,633		$	2,580	$	314		$	296	$	315		$	292	$	674		$	620	$	3,936		$	3,788

Rating	Rating
AAA	AAA	$	2,292		$	2,306	$	8		$	8	$	-		$	-	$	17		$	16	$	2,317		$	2,330	$	2,310		$	2,266	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	8		$	8	$	2,318		$	2,274
AA	AA		190			192		1			1		1			1		14			14		206			208		323			314		8			8		14			13		18			17		363			352
A	A		9			9		-			-		7			7		78			76		94			92		-			-		39			39		8			8		64			63		111			110
BBB	BBB		-			-		29			28		30			30		31			30		90			88		-			-		4			4		17			16		18			18		39			38
BB and below	BB and below		1			1		304			282		325			298		619			566		1,249			1,147		-			-		263			245		276			255		566			514		1,105			1,014
Total by rating (2)(3)(4)	Total by rating (2)(3)(4)	$	2,492		$	2,508	$	342		$	319	$	363		$	336	$	759		$	702	$	3,956		$	3,865	$	2,633		$	2,580	$	314		$	296	$	315		$	292	$	674		$	620	$	3,936		$	3,788

Origination Year	Origination Year
2008 and prior		$	542		$	502	$	342		$	319	$	362		$	335	$	759		$	702	$	2,005		$	1,858
2009			204			194		-			-		-			-		-			-		204			194
2009 and prior																											$	655		$	604	$	298		$	280	$	314		$	291	$	674		$	620	$	1,941		$	1,795
2010	2010		270			260		-			-		-			-		-			-		270			260		252			239		-			-		-			-		-			-		252			239
2011	2011		163			162		-			-		-			-		-			-		163			162		149			145		-			-		-			-		-			-		149			145
2012	2012		47			49		-			-		-			-		-			-		47			49		45			46		-			-		-			-		-			-		45			46
2013	2013		259			268		-			-		-			-		-			-		259			268		226			224		-			-		-			-		-			-		226			224
2014	2014		67			67		-			-		-			-		-			-		67			67		71			68		1			1		-			-		-			-		72			69
2015	2015		143			150		-			-		-			-		-			-		143			150		153			153		15			15		-			-		-			-		168			168
2016	2016		500			551		-			-		1			1		-			-		501			552		529			561		-			-		1			1		-			-		530			562
2017	2017		220			228		-			-		-			-		-			-		220			228		298			296		-			-		-			-		-			-		298			296
2018	2018		77			77		-			-		-			-		-			-		77			77		239			228		-			-		-			-		-			-		239			228
2019																												16			16		-			-		-			-		-			-		16			16
Total by origination	Total by origination
year (2)(3)	year (2)(3)	$	2,492		$	2,508	$	342		$	319	$	363		$	336	$	759		$	702	$	3,956		$	3,865	$	2,633		$	2,580	$	314		$	296	$	315		$	292	$	674		$	620	$	3,936		$	3,788

Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of																											Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of
residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities																											residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities																					4.0%			4.1%
	Total AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages a percentage of total AFS Securities																						4.3%			4.3%

	Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total AFS securities																						1.6%			1.5%
Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities																											Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities																					1.3%			1.3%

⁽¹⁾

Includes the fair value and amortized cost of option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”) within RMBS, totaling ~~$279~~$249 million and ~~$249~~$220 million, respectively.

⁽²⁾

Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling ~~$88~~$150 million that primarily support our Modco reinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The ~~$88~~$150 million in trading securities consisted of ~~$79~~$131 million prime, $3 million Alt-A and $6$16 million subprime.

⁽³⁾

Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling ~~$86~~$147 million that primarily support our Modco reinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The ~~$86~~$147 million in trading securities consisted of ~~$78~~$128 million prime, $3 million Alt-A and $5$16 million subprime.

⁽⁴⁾

Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second ~~highest~~lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.

None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative asset portfolio.

8176

The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of ~~June 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:



	Multiple Property				Single Property				CRE CDOs				Total				Multiple Property				Single Property				CRE CDOs				Total
	Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized
	Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost
Type
CMBS	$	731	$	745	$	16	$	14	$	-	$	-	$	747	$	759	$	873	$	857	$	12	$	11	$	-	$	-	$	885	$	868
CRE CDOs		-		-		-		-		19		14		19		14		-		-		-		-		13		8		13		8
Total by type (1)(2)	$	731	$	745	$	16	$	14	$	19	$	14	$	766	$	773	$	873	$	857	$	12	$	11	$	13	$	8	$	898	$	876

Rating
AAA	$	659	$	677	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	659	$	677	$	858	$	846	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	858	$	846
AA		4		4		9		8		-		-		13		12		6		6		7		6		-		-		13		12
A		52		51		7		6		3		3		62		60		3		3		5		5		-		-		8		8
BBB		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
BB and below		16		13		-		-		16		11		32		24		6		2		-		-		13		8		19		10
Total by rating (1)(2)(3)	$	731	$	745	$	16	$	14	$	19	$	14	$	766	$	773	$	873	$	857	$	12	$	11	$	13	$	8	$	898	$	876

Origination Year
2008 and prior	$	37	$	31	$	14	$	12	$	19	$	14	$	70	$	57
2009 and prior																	$	22	$	17	$	12	$	11	$	13	$	8	$	47	$	36
2010		48		47		2		2		-		-		50		49		3		3		-		-		-		-		3		3
2011		11		11		-		-		-		-		11		11		10		10		-		-		-		-		10		10
2012		27		27		-		-		-		-		27		27		28		27		-		-		-		-		28		27
2013		158		160		-		-		-		-		158		160		157		156		-		-		-		-		157		156
2015		10		10		-		-		-		-		10		10		10		10		-		-		-		-		10		10
2016		81		87		-		-		-		-		81		87		85		87		-		-		-		-		85		87
2017		290		302		-		-		-		-		290		302		325		323		-		-		-		-		325		323
2018		69		70		-		-		-		-		69		70		171		164		-		-		-		-		171		164
2019																		62		60		-		-		-		-		62		60
Total by origination year (1)(2)	$	731	$	745	$	16	$	14	$	19	$	14	$	766	$	773	$	873	$	857	$	12	$	11	$	13	$	8	$	898	$	876

Total AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages as a percentage of total AFS securities														0.8%		0.9%
Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of																	Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of
commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities																	commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities													0.9%		0.9%

⁽¹⁾

Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $2$39 million that primarily support our Modco reinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. ~~The $2 million in~~These trading securities consisted entirely of CMBS.

⁽²⁾

Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $2less than $38 million that primarily support our Modco reinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. ~~The $2 million in~~These trading securities consisted entirely of CMBS.

⁽³⁾

Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit agencies are not equivalent, the second ~~highest~~lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the fair value and amortized cost of our fixed maturity AFS exposure to monoline insurers was ~~$376~~$417 million and ~~$350~~$384 million, respectively.

Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities

When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings.

8277

The composition by industry categories of all securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, was as follows:



									%									%
							Gross		Gross							Gross		Gross
			%			%	Unrealized		Unrealized			%			%	Unrealized		Unrealized
	Fair		Fair	Amortized		Amortized	Losses		Losses	Fair		Fair	Amortized		Amortized	Losses		Losses
	Value		Value	Cost		Cost	and OTTI		and OTTI	Value		Value	Cost		Cost	and OTTI		and OTTI
Food and beverage										$	1,532	6.8%	$	1,617	6.9%	$	85	8.9%
Banking	$	3,283	8.7%	$	3,430	8.7%	$	147	8.4%		1,266	5.6%		1,337	5.7%		71	7.4%
Food and beverage		2,136	5.7%		2,255	5.7%		119	6.8%
Pharmaceuticals											1,121	5.0%		1,185	5.1%		64	6.7%
Electric		2,704	7.1%		2,816	7.1%		112	6.4%		1,652	7.4%		1,706	7.3%		54	5.6%
Pharmaceuticals		1,704	4.5%		1,796	4.6%		92	5.3%
Chemicals		1,738	4.6%		1,815	4.6%		77	4.4%		936	4.2%		988	4.2%		52	5.4%
Diversified manufacturing											858	3.8%		896	3.8%		38	4.0%
Healthcare		1,728	4.6%		1,805	4.6%		77	4.4%		1,001	4.5%		1,037	4.4%		36	3.8%
Diversified manufacturing		1,446	3.8%		1,510	3.8%		64	3.7%
Oil field services											166	0.7%		197	0.8%		31	3.2%
Independent											610	2.7%		632	2.7%		22	2.3%
Media – entertainment											409	1.8%		431	1.9%		22	2.3%
Transportation services											784	3.5%		805	3.5%		21	2.2%
Automotive											488	2.2%		508	2.2%		20	2.1%
Government owned, no guarantee											239	1.1%		258	1.1%		19	2.0%
Property and casualty											379	1.7%		397	1.7%		18	1.9%
Technology		1,874	5.0%		1,925	4.9%		51	2.9%		766	3.4%		781	3.3%		15	1.5%
Media – entertainment		834	2.2%		883	2.3%		49	2.8%
Railroads											353	1.6%		368	1.6%		15	1.5%
Aerospace											447	2.0%		462	2.0%		15	1.5%
Retailers											397	1.8%		412	1.8%		15	1.5%
Midstream		959	2.5%		1,001	2.5%		42	2.4%		511	2.3%		524	2.2%		13	1.4%
Transportation services		1,155	3.1%		1,197	3.0%		42	2.4%
Independent		909	2.4%		950	2.4%		41	2.3%
Retailers		753	2.0%		792	2.0%		39	2.2%
MBS		417	1.1%		454	1.1%		37	2.1%
Property and casualty		668	1.8%		703	1.8%		35	2.0%
Railroads		488	1.3%		523	1.3%		35	2.0%
Oil field services		296	0.8%		328	0.8%		32	1.8%
Life		574	1.5%		605	1.5%		31	1.8%		312	1.4%		324	1.4%		12	1.3%
Consumer products		566	1.5%		597	1.5%		31	1.8%
Industries with unrealized losses
less than $30 million		13,525	35.8%		14,122	35.8%		597	34.1%
less than $25 million											8,189	36.5%		8,511	36.4%		322	33.5%
Total by industry	$	37,757	100.0%	$	39,507	100.0%	$	1,750	100.0%	$	22,416	100.0%	$	23,376	100.0%	$	960	100.0%

Total by industry as a percentage
of total AFS securities		40.6%			43.9%			100.0%
Total by industry as a percentage of
total fixed maturity AFS securities											22.9%			25.2%			100.0%

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the fair value and amortized cost of securities subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss position was ~~$96~~$171 million and ~~$124~~$202 million, respectively.

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):



	As of June 30, 2018			As of December 31, 2017
	Carrying			Carrying			As of March 31, 2019
	Value		%	Value		%	Commercial		Residential			Total			%
Credit Quality Indicator
Current	$	12,213	100.0%	$	10,760	100.0%	$	13,582	$	414		$	13,996		100.0%
Delinquent (1)		2	0.0%		-	0.0%		-		1			1		0.0%
Foreclosure (2)		2	0.0%		2	0.0%		-		1			1		0.0%
General valuation allowance								-		(1	)		(1	)	0.0%
Total mortgage loans on real estate	$	12,217	100.0%	$	10,762	100.0%	$	13,582	$	415		$	13,997		100.0%

	As of December 31, 2018
	Commercial		Residential		Total		%
Credit Quality Indicator
Current	$	13,012	$	247	$	13,259	100.0%
Delinquent (1)		-		1		1	0.0%
Foreclosure (2)		-		-		-	0.0%
Total mortgage loans on real estate	$	13,012	$	248	$	13,260	100.0%

⁽¹⁾

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, five commercial loans and ten residential loans were delinquent. As of December 31, ~~2017, there~~2018, nine commercial loans and two residential loans were ~~12 and zero mortgage loans on real estate that were delinquent, respectively.~~delinquent.

⁽²⁾

As of ~~June 30, 2018, and~~March 31, 2019, two residential loans were in foreclosure. As of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, there ~~was one~~were no mortgage ~~loan on real estate~~loans that ~~was~~were in foreclosure.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, there were ~~two and three~~no specifically identified impaired ~~mortgage loans on real estate, respectively,~~commercial or ~~less than 1% of the total dollar amount of~~residential mortgage loans on real estate. The total outstanding principal and interest on the mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, was $5$2 million and $4$1 million, respectively. See Note 1 in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.

The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment (in millions) was as follows:



	As of						As of
	June 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
		2018			2017			2019			2018
By Segment
Annuities		$	3,538		$	3,244		$	4,163		$	3,962
Retirement Plan Services			3,399			3,141			3,683			3,599
Life Insurance			3,700			3,628			4,062			3,829
Group Protection			1,029			332			1,141			1,089
Other Operations			551			417			948			781
Total mortgage loans on real estate		$	12,217		$	10,762		$	13,997		$	13,260

The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:



	As of June 30, 2018				As of June 30, 2018			As of March 31, 2019				As of March 31, 2019
	Carrying				Carrying			Carrying				Carrying
	Value		%		Value		%	Value		%		Value		%
Property Type				State Exposure							State Exposure
Apartment	$	4,016	32.9%	CA	$	2,663	21.8%	$	4,383	32.3%	CA	$	3,128	23.0%
Office building		3,086	25.3%	TX		1,502	12.3%		3,331	24.5%	TX		1,635	12.0%
Retail		2,357	19.3%	MD		603	4.9%		2,470	18.2%	MD		689	5.1%
Industrial		2,128	17.4%	FL		573	4.7%		2,537	18.7%	GA		604	4.4%
Other commercial		423	3.5%	OH		520	4.3%		582	4.3%	NY		596	4.4%
Mixed use		130	1.1%	NY		519	4.2%		201	1.5%	FL		569	4.2%
Hotel/motel		77	0.5%	TN		485	4.0%		78	0.5%	OH		534	3.9%
Total	$	12,217	100.0%	VA		475	3.9%	$	13,582	100.0%	PA		499	3.7%
Geographic Region				PA		467	3.8%				VA		477	3.5%
Pacific	$	3,361	27.5%	GA		455	3.7%	$	3,884	28.6%	WA		468	3.4%
South Atlantic		2,757	22.6%	WA		420	3.4%		3,128	23.0%	TN		443	3.3%
West South Central		1,597	13.1%	NC		375	3.1%		1,745	12.9%	NC		397	2.9%
East North Central		1,368	11.2%	WI		329	2.7%		1,411	10.4%	WI		334	2.5%
Middle Atlantic		1,031	8.4%	IL		280	2.3%		1,236	9.1%	IL		327	2.4%
Mountain		690	5.6%	AZ		280	2.3%		720	5.3%	OR		288	2.1%
East South Central		647	5.3%	OR		278	2.3%		585	4.3%	AZ		283	2.1%
West North Central		479	3.9%	MA		256	2.1%		491	3.6%	MA		280	2.1%
New England		287	2.4%	Other states under 2%		1,737	14.2%		382	2.8%	Other states under 2%		2,031	15.0%
Total	$	12,217	100.0%	Total	$	12,217	100.0%	$	13,582	100.0%	Total	$	13,582	100.0%

As of June 30, 2018

As of June 30, 2018

Principal

Principal

Amount

%

Amount

%

Origination Year

Future Principal Payments

2013 and prior
$
3,485

28.5%

2018
$
359

2.9%

2014

1,311

10.7%

2019

518

4.2%

2015

1,915

15.6%

2020

490

4.0%

2016

2,079

17.0%

2021

879

7.2%

2017

2,086

17.1%

2022

804

6.6%

2018

1,360

11.1%

2023 and thereafter

9,186

75.1%

Total
$
12,236

100.0%

Total
$
12,236

100.0%

The following tables show the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by origination year and by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:


	As of March 31, 2019
	Commercial		Residential		Total		%
Origination Year
2014 and prior	$	4,207	$	-	$	4,207	30.1%
2015		1,824		-		1,824	13.0%
2016		2,035		-		2,035	14.5%
2017		2,052		-		2,052	14.7%
2018		2,680		286		2,966	21.2%
2019		800		117		917	6.5%
Total	$	13,598	$	403	$	14,001	100.0%

	As of March 31, 2019
	Commercial		Residential		Total		%
Principal Repayment Year
2019	$	379	$	3	$	382	2.7%
2020		499		4		503	3.6%
2021		924		5		929	6.6%
2022		859		5		864	6.2%
2023		850		5		855	6.1%
2024 and thereafter		10,087		381		10,468	74.8%
Total	$	13,598	$	403	$	14,001	100.0%

See Note 5 for information regarding our loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for loan losses.

Alternative Investments

Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment (in millions) was as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Annuities	$	3	$	8	$	9	$	14	$	1	$	6
Retirement Plan Services		2		4		5		7		-		3
Life Insurance		13		40		41		75		1		28
Group Protection		2		2		4		5		-		2
Other Operations		-		1		2		3		1		2
Total (1)	$	20	$	55	$	61	$	104	$	3	$	41

⁽¹⁾

Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.

As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, alternative investments included investments in ~~238~~246 and ~~224~~237 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 2% and 1% of our overall invested ~~assets.~~assets, respectively. As of March 31, 2019, there were three partnerships totaling $85 million that support our Modco reinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Non-Income Producing Investments

The carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, was ~~$8 million and $9 million, respectively.~~$7 million.

Net Investment Income

Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six					For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended					Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,					March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017		2019			2018
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities	$	1,045		$	1,045		$	2,087		$	2,083	$	1,072		$	1,042
Equity AFS securities		-			2			-			5
Trading securities		20			23			43			47		34			23
Equity securities		-			-			1			-		1			1
Mortgage loans on real estate		122			109			236			219		142			114
Real estate		-			1			-			1
Policy loans		34			34			67			67		32			32
Invested cash		5			3			11			4		7			6
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums (1)		24			37			42			54		15			18
Alternative investments (2)		20			55			61			104		3			41
Consent fees		2			1			2			2		1			1
Other investments		5			-			8			-		7			3
Investment income		1,277			1,310			2,558			2,586		1,314			1,281
Investment expense		(45	)		(48	)		(93	)		(87		(63	)		(48	)
Net investment income	$	1,232		$	1,262		$	2,465		$	2,499	$	1,251		$	1,233

⁽¹⁾

See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.

⁽²⁾

See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Interest Rate Yield

Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate

and other, net of investment expenses
4.46%

4.57%

4.48%

4.59%

Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond

make-whole premiums
0.09%

0.14%

0.08%

0.10%

Alternative investments
0.08%

0.21%

0.12%

0.20%

Net investment income yield on invested assets
4.63%

4.92%

4.68%

4.89%


	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019	2018
Interest Rate Yield
Fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on
real estate and other, net of investment expenses	4.33%	4.50%
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums	0.05%	0.07%
Alternative investments	0.01%	0.16%
Net investment income yield on invested assets	4.39%	4.73%

For the Three

For the Six

Months Ended

Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

Average invested assets at amortized cost
$
106,436

$
102,556

$
105,407

$
102,132


	For the Three
	Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Average invested assets at amortized cost	$	114,075	$	104,378

We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the contract holder on our average fixed account values, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.

Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums

Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.

Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Investments

Details of the realized gain (loss) related to certain investments (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
Fixed maturity AFS securities: ~~(1)~~
Gross gains	$	1		$	3		$	16		$	11		$	12		$	14
Gross losses		(12	)		(13	)		(45	)		(25	)		(27	)		(30	)
Equity AFS securities:
Gross gains		-			-			-			1
Gain (loss) on other investments (2)		4			(2	)		6			(5	)
Gross OTTI														(8	)		(2	)
Gain (loss) on other investments (1)														5			2
Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA,
DSI and DFEL and changes in
other contract holder funds		(6	)		(6	)		(11	)		(13	)		(2	)		(5	)
Total realized gain (loss) related to
certain investments, pre-tax	$	(13	)	$	(18	)	$	(34	)	$	(31	)
certain investments													$	(20	)	$	(21	)

⁽¹⁾

~~These amounts are represented net of related fair value hedging activity. See Note 6 for more information.~~

⁽²⁾

Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $2$6 million and less than $1 million for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization and changes in other contract holder funds within realized losses reflecting the incremental effect of actual

versus expected credit-related investment losses. These actual to expected amortization adjustments could create volatility in net realized gains and losses.

Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. During the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we sold securities for gains and losses. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are other-than-temporary, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as fixed maturity AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading invested assets within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the fixed maturity AFS classification.

We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent write-downs have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties.

When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the security is written down to estimated recovery value. In instances where declines are considered temporary, the security will continue to be carefully monitored. See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Introduction – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Investments – Write-downs for OTTI and Allowance for Losses” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for additional information on our portfolio management strategy.



	For the Three						For the Six						For the Three
	Months Ended						Months Ended						Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	(1	)	$	(4	)	$	(3	)	$	(5	)	$	(6	)	$	(2	)
ABS		-			-			-			(1	)		(1	)		-
RMBS		-			-			-			(1	)		(1	)		-
State and municipal bonds		-			-			-			(1	)
Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss)		(1	)		(4	)		(3	)		(8	)		(8	)		(2	)
Associated amortization of DAC,
VOBA, DSI and DFEL		-			-			-			-			-			-
Net OTTI recognized in net income
(loss), pre-tax	$	(1	)	$	(4	)	$	(3	)	$	(8	)
Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss)													$	(8	)	$	(2	)

Portion of OTTI Recognized in OCI
Gross OTTI recognized in OCI													$	16		$	-
Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL														(1	)		-
Net portion of OTTI recognized in OCI													$	15		$	-

The $3$8 million of impairments recognized in net income taken during the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018~~2019 were all credit-related impairments. The ~~decrease~~increase in write-downs for OTTI when comparing the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018~~2019 to the corresponding period in ~~2017~~2018 was primarily attributable to the ~~stabilization~~destabilization of certain corporate ~~and municipal bond~~ holdings as well as ~~gradual recovery~~certain ABS and RMBS holdings.

We recognized $16 million of ~~RMBS~~OTTI in OCI, offset by $1 million for the change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and ~~ABS investments.~~DFEL, for the three months ended March 31, 2019. We recognized less than $1 million of OTTI in OCI for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2018. The increase in OTTI recognized in OCI was primarily attributable to the fair values and ~~2017.~~recovery values being less aligned on impaired securities resulting in an increase of the non-credit portion of the impairment.

REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity and Cash Flow

Liquidity refers to the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash from its normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Our principal sources of cash flow from operating activities are insurance premiums and fees and investment income, while sources of cash flows from investing activities result from maturities and sales of invested assets. Our operating activities (used) provided cash of ~~$632 million~~$(1.3) billion and ~~$202~~$140 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. The use of cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2019, was primarily driven by purchases of trading securities in repositioning a portion of a Modco investment portfolio from AFS securities to trading securities. As a result, the cash outflows from operating activities were largely offset by sales of AFS securities within investing activities. See Note 8 for more information. When considering our liquidity and cash flow, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC derives its cash primarily from its operating subsidiaries.

The sources of liquidity of the holding company are principally comprised of dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an SEC-filed shelf registration statement. These sources of liquidity and cash flow support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common stock dividends, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, securities repurchases, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.

Details underlying the primary sources of our holding company cash flows (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Dividends from Subsidiaries
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company	$	-	$	244	$	-	$	454
First Penn-Pacific		-		20		-		20
Lincoln National Management Corporation		-		-		-		65
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“LNL”)									$	200	$	-
Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited										50		-
Total dividends from subsidiaries	$	-	$	264	$	-	$	539	$	250	$	-

Loan Repayments and Interest from Subsidiaries
Interest on inter-company notes	$	30	$	29	$	61	$	80	$	14	$	31

Other Cash Flow Items
Amounts received from (paid for taxes on)
stock option exercises and restricted stock, net	$	1	$	4	$	2	$	42	$	12	$	1

The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, namely the periodic issuance and retirement of debt and cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program (discussed below). Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company. For information regarding limits on the dividends that our insurance subsidiaries may pay without prior approval, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Review of Consolidated Financial Condition – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends ~~from Subsidiaries”~~and Other Payments” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Insurance Subsidiaries’ Statutory Capital and Surplus

Our regulatory capital levels are also affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. Our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves calculated pursuant to XXX and AG38, respectively. As discussed in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory, and Tax – Attempts to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX and Actuarial Guideline 38 may fail in whole or in part resulting in an adverse effect on our financial condition and result of operations” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K, our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to ~~insurance~~reinsurance captives. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, was approximately $2.3 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance arrangements for UL products containing secondary guarantees ($350 million will expire in 2019 and $1.9 billion relates to arrangements that will expire by 2031). For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 1213 in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.1 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves as of ~~June 30, 2018;~~March 31, 2019; of this amount, ~~$2.0~~$2.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 4 in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees. AnWhile we believe we have sufficient capital to support the statutory reserves on this business, an inability to obtain ~~appropriate~~efficient capital market solutions could affect our returns on our in-force term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees. However, we believe that we have sufficient capital to support the increase in statutory reserves, based on our current reserve projections, if such structures were no longer available.these types of products.

Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. The NAIC’s adoption of the ~~new~~ Valuation Manual that defines a principles-based reserving framework for newly issued life insurance policies was effective January 1, 2017. Principles-based reserving places a greater weight on our past experience and anticipated future experience as well as considers current economic conditions in calculating life insurance product reserves in accordance with statutory accounting principles. We adopted the ~~new~~ framework for our newly issued term business in 2017 and will phase in the framework ~~prior to~~by January 1, 2020, for all other newly issued life insurance products. We believe that these changes may reduce our future use of captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries for reserve financing transactions for our life insurance business. For more information on principles-based reserving, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Statutory reserves established for variable annuity contracts and riders are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and are affected by the level of account values relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and derivative assets hedging these reserves. We also utilize inter-company reinsurance arrangements to manage our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. The NAIC ~~through its various committees, task forces and working groups continues to evaluate~~is currently in the ~~adequacy~~process of ~~existing NAIC model regulations with a focus on targeted improvements~~implementing changes to the statutory reserving, capital and accounting framework for variable ~~annuities.~~annuities that

will go into effect as of January 1, 2020. The NAIC is also considering modifications to the NAIC RBC C-1 capital charges for bonds, which may impact the level of the C-1 related RBC we are required to hold. For more information, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Federal Regulation – Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our financial statements” in our 2018 Form 10-K.

We continue to analyze the use of our existing captive reinsurance structures, as well as additional third-party reinsurance arrangements, and our current hedging strategies relative to managing the effects of equity markets and interest rates on the statutory reserves, statutory capital and the dividend capacity of our life insurance subsidiaries.

Financing Activities

Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically we may issue debt or equity securities to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of our debt and equity securities.

We currently have an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares.

Details underlying debt and financing activities (in millions) for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, were as follows:



					Maturities,				Change													Maturities,			Change
					Repayments				in Fair													Repayments			in Fair
	Beginning				and				Value				Other			Ending		Beginning				and			Value			Other			Ending
	Balance		Issuance		Refinancing				Hedges			Changes (1)				Balance		Balance		Issuance		Refinancing			Hedges		Changes (1)				Balance
Short-Term Debt
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	450	$	-		$	(450	)	$	-			$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	300		$	300

Long-Term Debt
Senior notes	$	3,687	$	1,100		$	(287	)	$	(76	)		$	(5	)	$	4,419	$	4,432	$	-		$	-	$	34		$	(301	)	$	4,165
Bank borrowing ~~(2)~~		-		200			-			-				-			200		200		-			-		-			-			200
Capital securities ~~(3)~~(2)		1,207		-			-			-				-			1,207		1,207		-			-		-			-			1,207
Total long-term debt	$	4,894	$	1,300		$	(287	)	$	(76	)		$	(5	)	$	5,826	$	5,839	$	-		$	-	$	34		$	(301	)	$	5,572

⁽¹⁾

Includes the net increase (decrease) in commercial paper, non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, ~~and~~ amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.

⁽²⁾

~~We refinanced a $250 million floating rate loan that was scheduled to mature on June 6, 2018, into a $200 million floating rate loan maturing on June 6, 2023.~~

⁽³⁾

To hedge the variability in rates, we ~~have~~ purchased ~~forward starting~~ interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining terms of the capital securities.

On February 12, 2018, we completed the issuance and sale of $150 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% senior notes due 2023 and $450 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.35% senior notes due 2048. We used these proceeds to repurchase $200 million of our 7.00% senior notes due 2018 and $287 million of our 8.75% senior notes due 2019. In addition, on February 12, 2018, we completed the issuance and sale of $500 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.80% senior notes due 2028. We used these proceeds, together with cash on hand and other arrangements, to fund our recent acquisition as described in Note 3. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~

March 31, 2019, the holding company had available liquidity of ~~$484~~$481 million. Available liquidity consists of cash and invested cash, excluding cash held as collateral, and certain short-term investments that can be readily converted into cash, net of commercial paper outstanding.

For more information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities and LOCs, see ~~Notes 12 and 24~~Note 13 in our ~~2017 Form 10-K as updated by Note 9 in our first quarter~~ 2018 Form ~~10-Q.~~10-K.

We have not accounted for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, or other transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase the transferred assets as sales. For information about our collateralized financing transactions on our investments, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 5.

If current credit ratings or claims-paying ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our counterparties, there is a termination event with respect to LNC if its long-term senior debt ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s); or with respect to ~~Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“LNL”)~~LNL if its financial strength ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). Our long-term senior debt held a rating of A-/Baa1 (S&P/Moody’s) as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for more information. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for additional information on our current financial strength ratings.

See “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Review of Consolidated Financial Condition – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K for information on our credit ratings.

Alternative Sources of Liquidity

In order to manage our capital more efficiently, we have an inter-company cash management program where certain subsidiaries can lend to or borrow from the holding company to meet short-term borrowing needs. The cash management program is essentially a series of demand loans between LNC and participating subsidiaries that reduces overall borrowing costs by allowing LNC and its subsidiaries to access internal resources instead of incurring third-party transaction costs. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the holding company had a net outstanding receivable (payable) of ~~$125~~$111 million from (to) certain subsidiaries resulting from loans made by subsidiaries in excess of amounts placed (borrowed) by the holding company and subsidiaries in the inter-company cash management account. Any change in holding company cash management program balances is offset by the immediate and equal change in holding company cash and invested cash. Loans under the cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our ~~Indiana-domiciled~~Indiana and New Hampshire-domiciled insurance subsidiaries, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of the last year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC.

Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can access liquidity through securities lending programs and repurchase agreements. Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $5.0 billion under the FHLBI facility as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our insurance subsidiaries had investments with a carrying value of ~~$4.2~~$4.7 billion out on loan or subject to repurchase agreements. The cash received in our securities lending programs and repurchase agreements is typically invested in cash equivalents, short-term investments or fixed maturity securities. For additional details, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 5.

Cash Flows from Collateral on Derivatives

Our cash flows associated with collateral received from and posted with counterparties change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. As the value of a derivative asset decreases (or increases), the collateral required to be posted by our counterparties would also decrease (or increase). Likewise, when the value of a derivative liability decreases (or increases), the collateral we are required to post to our counterparties would also decrease (or increase). ~~During 2018,~~For the three months ended March 31, 2019, our collateral payable for derivative investments ~~decreased~~increased due primarily to ~~increasing~~decreasing interest rates that ~~decreased~~increased the fair values of our associated over-the-counter derivative investments. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to post collateral with a counterparty if our net derivative liability position reaches certain contractual levels. If we do not have sufficient high quality securities or cash and invested cash to provide as collateral, we have liquidity sources, as discussed above, to leverage that would be eligible for collateral posting. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 6.

Uses of Capital

Our principal uses of cash are to pay policy claims and benefits, operating expenses, commissions and taxes, to purchase new investments, to purchase reinsurance, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our stockholders, to repurchase our stock and to repay debt.

Return of Capital to Common Stockholders

One of the Company’s primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchase depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of free cash flow and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. Free cash flow for the holding company generally represents the amount of dividends and interest received from subsidiaries less interest paid on debt.

Details underlying this activity (in ~~millions, except per share data),~~millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Dividends to common stockholders	$	72	$	65	$	144	$	131	$	76	$	72
Repurchase of common stock		100		200		100		400		240		-
Total cash returned to stockholders	$	172	$	265	$	244	$	531	$	316	$	72

Number of shares repurchased		1.456		3.030		1.456		5.894		3.9		-
Average price per share	$	68.71	$	68.00	$	68.71	$	68.90

On October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our Board of Directors approved an increase of the quarterly dividend on our common stock from ~~$0.29~~$0.33 to ~~$0.33~~$0.37 per share. Additionally, we expect to repurchase additional shares of common stock during ~~2018~~2019 depending on market conditions and alternative uses of capital. For more information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II – Item 2(c)” below.

Other Uses of Capital

In addition to the amounts in the table above in “Return of Capital to Common Stockholders,” other uses of holding company cash flow (in millions) were as follows:



	For the Three				For the Six				For the Three
	Months Ended				Months Ended				Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				March 31,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018
Debt service (interest paid)	$	69	$	64	$	141	$	126	$	61	$	72
Capital contribution to subsidiaries		500		-		502		60		-		2
Total	$	569	$	64	$	643	$	186	$	61	$	74

The above table focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, namely the periodic retirement of debt and cash flows related to our inter-company cash management account. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company.

~~We made an investment in our Group business through our acquisition of Liberty Life, a subsidiary of LNL, which impacted our liquidity and capital position. For additional information on~~ ~~our acquisition, see~~ ~~“Introduction – Executive Summary” above and Note 3 herein.~~

Significant Trends in Sources and Uses of Cash Flow

As stated above, LNC’s cash flow, as a holding company, is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance company subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and statutory earnings performance. We currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs and to have sufficient capital to offer downside protection in the event that the capital and credit markets experience ~~another~~a period of extreme volatility and disruption. A decline in capital market conditions, which reduces our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC, may require them to retain more capital and may pressure our subsidiaries’ dividends to the holding company, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital.

For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K ~~as updated by “Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our first quarter 2018 Form 10-Q~~ and ~~below.~~

~~For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see~~ “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” ~~above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2017 Form 10-K as updated by “Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our first quarter 2018 Form 10-Q and below.~~above.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We analyze and manage the risks arising from market exposures of financial instruments, as well as other risks, in an integrated asset-liability management process that considers diversification. We have exposures to several market risks including interest rate risk, equity market risk, credit risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency exchange risk. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, there have been no material changes in our economic exposure to these market risks since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. For information on these market risks, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Conclusions Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period required by this report, we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in our periodic reports under the Exchange Act.

~~Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting~~

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We acquired Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”) on May 1, 2018, and have not yet included Liberty Life in our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, pursuant to the SEC’s general guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted from the scope of an assessment infor one year from the ~~year~~date of acquisition, the scope of our assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ~~does~~for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 did not include an assessment of those disclosure controls and procedures that are included within internal control over financial reporting as it relates to Liberty Life. See Note 3 for additional information.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~Information regarding reportable legal proceedings~~Cost of Insurance Litigation

Reference is ~~contained~~made to Glover v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. In response to the January 11, 2019, dismissal by the court of Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint, which we have opposed.

See Note 1011 in “Part I – Item ~~1.”~~1” above for further discussion regarding this and other contingencies.

Item 1A1A. . Risk Factors

~~Legislative, Regulatory and Tax~~

~~Federal Regulation~~

~~Standard of Conduct regulations could cause changes to the manner in which we deliver products and services as well as changes in nature and amount of compensation and fees.~~

In 2016, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) released the DOL Fiduciary Rule, which became effective on June 9, 2017, and substantially expanded the range of activities considered to be fiduciary investment advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Fifth Circuit”) issued an opinion in the case ~~Chamber of Commerce v. the U.S. Department of Labor~~ vacating the DOL Fiduciary Rule and related applicable exemptions. The DOL and the Department of Justice did not appeal the Fifth Circuit’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, and on June 21, 2018, the Fifth Circuit issued a mandate stating that the original definition of “fiduciary,” including the original five-part test, will apply going forward.

On April 18, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) proposed “Regulation Best Interest,” a new standard of conduct for broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would require a broker-dealer to act in the best interest of a retail customer when making a recommendation of any securities transaction, without putting its financial interests ahead of the interests of a retail customer. The proposed rule includes guidance on what constitutes a “recommendation” and a definition of who would be a “retail customer” in addition to provisions setting forth certain required disclosures, policies and procedures to identify conflicts of interest, and customer-specific best interest obligations.

In addition, the SEC proposed the use of a new disclosure document, the customer or client relationship summary, or Form CRS. Form CRS is intended to provide retail investors with information about the nature of their relationship with their investment professional, and would supplement other more detailed disclosures, including existing Form ADV for advisors and the new disclosures under Regulation Best Interest for broker dealers.

Finally, the SEC proposed interpretative guidance providing clarity on an investment adviser’s fiduciary obligation under the Advisers Act. The guidance indicates that investment advisers have a fiduciary duty to their clients that includes both a duty of care and a duty of loyalty and provides additional clarification of an investment adviser’s responsibilities under these fiduciary duties. Investment advisers and broker-dealers would also need to disclose their registration status with the SEC in certain retail investor communications. The comment period on the proposals is expected to close on August 7, 2018.

In addition to the ~~SEC proposed rules,~~factors set forth in “Part I – Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above, you should carefully consider the~~National Association~~ risks described under “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Such risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of ~~Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”)~~these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and ~~several states, including Connecticut, Nevada, New Jersey and New York have passed laws or proposed regulations requiring investment advisers, broker-dealers and/or agents to disclose conflicts~~results of ~~interest to clients or to meet standards~~operations could be materially affected. In that ~~their advice be in~~case, the ~~customer’s best interest. These recent developments could result in additional requirements related to the sale~~value of our ~~products.~~

It is uncertain at this point, how the original DOL definition of “fiduciary” will work in conjunction with any final rules adopted by the SEC, the NAIC or any individual state. While we continue to monitor and evaluate the various proposals, we cannot predict what other proposals may be made, what legislation or regulation may be introduced or become law. Therefore, until such time as final rules or laws are in place, the potential impact on our business is uncertain.securities could decline substantially.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) The following table summarizes purchases of equity securities by the Company during the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 (dollars in millions, except per share data):

(a) Total

(c) Total Number

(d) Approximate Dollar

Number

(b) Average

of Shares (or Units)

Value of Shares (or

of Shares

Price Paid

Purchased as Part of

Units) that May Yet Be

(or Units)

per Share

Publicly Announced

Purchased Under the

Period

Purchased (1)

(or Unit)

Plans or Programs (2)

Plans or Programs (2)(3)

4/1/18 – 4/30/18

-

$
-

-

$
961

5/1/18 – 5/31/18

1,455,895

68.71

1,455,895

861

6/1/18 – 6/30/18

-

-

-

861



					(c) Total Number		(d) Approximate Dollar
	(a) Total				of Shares		Value of Shares
	Number		(b) Average		Purchased as Part of		that May Yet Be
	of Shares		Price Paid		Publicly Announced		Purchased Under the
Period	Purchased (1)		per Share		Plans or Programs (2)		Plans or Programs (2)
1/1/19 – 1/31/19		1,552,494	$	59.05		1,552,494	$	637

2/1/19 – 2/28/19		816,328		61.27		816,328		587

3/1/19 – 3/31/19		1,519,909		58.08		1,519,909		587

⁽¹⁾

Of the total number of shares purchased, no shares were received in connection with the exercise of stock options and related taxes. For the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, there were ~~1,455,895~~3,888,731 shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs. This amount included 1,378,912 shares delivered on March 26, 2019, upon settlement of our accelerated share repurchase agreement entered into on December 10, 2018.

⁽²⁾

On November ~~9, 2017,~~8, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in our securities repurchase authorization, bringing the total aggregate repurchase authorization to ~~$1.0~~$1.25 billion. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our remaining security repurchase authorization was ~~$861~~$587 million. The security repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date. The amount and timing of share repurchase depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of free cash flow and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. Our stock repurchases may be effected from time to time through open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to aan accelerated share repurchase agreement or Rule 10b5-1 plan.

⁽³⁾

~~As of the last day of the applicable month.~~

Item 6. Exhibits

The Exhibits included in this report are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page 9589, which is incorporated herein by reference.

9488

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

Exhibit Index for the Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019



1210.1	~~Historical Ratio~~The Severance Plan for Officers of ~~Earnings to Fixed Charges.~~LNC (amended and restated effective as of February 27, 2019) is filed herewith.*
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

* This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

9589

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ RANDAL J. FREITAG
		Randal J. Freitag Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	By:	/s/ CHRISTINE A. JANOFSKY
		Christine A. Janofsky Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: ~~August~~ May 2, ~~2018~~2019

9690



			Weighted-
			Average
			Amortization
	Fair Value		Period
Value of customer relationships acquired	$	576	20
Value of distribution agreements		31	13
Value of business acquired		30	3
Insurance licenses		3	N/A
Total identifiable intangible assets	$	640


		For the		For the
		Three		Six
		Months		Months
		Ended		Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
		2018		2018
10-year LNC stock options		27,463		481,404
Performance shares		431		156,676
RSUs		103,769		694,269
Non-employee:
SARs		-		14,692
Agent stock options		-		32,400
Director DSUs		7,845		14,498



	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
							Gains		Issuances,				Transfers
				Items			(Losses)		Sales,				Into or
				Included			in		Maturities,				Out
	Beginning			in			OCI		Settlements,				of			Ending
	Fair			Net			and			Calls,			Level 3,			Fair
	Value			Income			Other (1)			Net (2)			Net (3)(4)			Value
Investments: (5)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds	$	3,091		$	6		$	(107	)	$	231		$	(40	)	$	3,181
ABS		27			-			(1	)		5			-			31
U.S. government bonds		5			-			-			(5	)		-			-
Foreign government bonds		110			-			(2	)		-			-			108
RMBS		12			-			-			-			(12	)		-
CMBS		6			1			-			19			(21	)		5
CLOs		91			-			-			147			(93	)		145
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities		76			-			2			-			-			78
Equity AFS securities		162			-			-			-			(162	)		-
Trading securities		49			(5	)		-			(22	)		-			22
Equity securities		-			-			-			-			26			26
Derivative investments		30			222			(59	)		(100	)		-			93
Other assets: (6)
GLB direct embedded derivatives		903			345			-			-			-			1,248
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		51			(10	)		-			-			-			41
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives		11			1			-			17			-			29
Future contract benefits – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives (6)		(1,418	)		(10	)		-			28			-			(1,400	)
Other liabilities: (6)
GLB ceded embedded derivatives		(67	)		(64	)		-			-			-			(131	)
Total, net	$	3,139		$	486		$	(167	)	$	320		$	(302	)	$	3,476



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Retirement
			Plan		Life		Group		Other
	Annuities		Services		Insurance		Protection		Operations		Total
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Fee income	$	133	$	42	$	6	$	-	$	-	$	181
Other revenues		119		5		2		27		-		153
Total revenue from contracts
with customers	$	252	$	47	$	8	$	27	$	-	$	334

Timing of Revenue Recognition
Satisfaction of performance obligation:
Transferred at a point in time	$	18	$	2	$	2	$	-	$	-	$	22
Transferred over time		234		45		6		27		-		312
Total revenue from contracts
with customers	$	252	$	47	$	8	$	27	$	-	$	334


	As of June 30, 2018				As of June 30, 2018
	Principal				Principal
	Amount		%		Amount		%
Origination Year				Future Principal Payments
2013 and prior	$	3,485	28.5%	2018	$	359	2.9%
2014		1,311	10.7%	2019		518	4.2%
2015		1,915	15.6%	2020		490	4.0%
2016		2,079	17.0%	2021		879	7.2%
2017		2,086	17.1%	2022		804	6.6%
2018		1,360	11.1%	2023 and thereafter		9,186	75.1%
Total	$	12,236	100.0%	Total	$	12,236	100.0%