PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Operations

For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per-share and average shares data)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(In thousands, except share data)

Assets		March 31,         2003        (Unaudited)		December 31,         2002
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	33,275	$	28,035
Marketable securities		2,252		2,371
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $29,731         and $43,156		223,888		226,091
Inventories - net		272,391		255,218
Deferred income taxes		98,276		96,741
Other current assets		45,773		38,708
Total current assets		675,855		647,164
Property, plant and equipment - net		316,970		319,301
Goodwill - net		383,378		380,338
Other intangible assets - net		126,595		127,299
Deferred income taxes		19,637		19,662
Other non-current assets		61,049		83,359
Total assets	$	1,583,484	$	1,577,123
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	392,246	$	350,315
Current portion of long-term debt		31,902		33,328
Short-term borrowings		8,053		9,304
Product warranties		30,900		31,276
Product liability		36,520		36,175
Total current liabilities		499,621		460,398
Non-Current Liabilities:
Long-term debt, less current portion		610,988		623,547
Pension obligations		66,389		66,051
Postretirement health and other benefit obligations		65,902		65,777
Other non-current liabilities		50,149		66,235
Total non-current liabilities		793,428		821,610
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock (36,746,482 shares issued,         26,412,735 shares outstanding for both periods)		367		367
Additional paid-in capital		81,230		81,230
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(28,859	)	(23,574	)
Unearned compensation		(539	)	(609	)
Retained earnings		345,224		344,689
Treasury stock, at cost
(10,358,562 shares for both periods)		(106,988	)	(106,988	)
Total stockholders' equity		290,435		295,115
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,583,484	$	1,577,123

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

2

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.

Consolidated StatementsBalance Sheets

As of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002

(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
 (In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

3

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

4

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

5

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002

1.  Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations, cash flows and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002 and the financial position at March 31,September 30, 2003.  The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and do not contain information included in the company'scompany’s annual consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2002.  The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  It is suggested that theseThese financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the company'scompany’s latest annual report.

All dollar amounts, except per share amounts, are in thousands of dollars throughout the tables included in these notes unless otherwise indicated.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

2. Acquisitions

2002

On August 8, 2002 the company acquired all of the outstanding common shares of Grove Investors, Inc. (Grove). The results of Grove'sGrove’s operations have been included in the Consolidated StatementStatements of EarningsOperations since that date. Grove is a leading provider of mobile telescopic cranes, truck-mounted cranes, and aerial work platforms for the global market. Grove'sGrove’s products are used in a wide variety of applications by commercial and residential building contractors as well as by industrial, municipal, and military end users. Grove'sGrove’s products are marketed to independent equipment rental companies and directly to end users under the brand names Grove Crane, Grove Manlift, and National Crane.

The company views Grove as a strategic fit with its crane business for a number of reasons. Grove is a global leader in the mobile telescopic crane industry, specifically in all-terrain and rough-terrain mobile telescopic cranes. The company did not offer these types of cranes prior to the acquisition, so Grove filled this void in the company'scompany’s product offering. Coupled with the company'scompany’s recent entrance into the tower crane product line with the acquisition of Potain in 2001, Grove enables the company to offer customers threefour major crane categories, namely crawler cranes, tower cranes, and mobile telescopic cranes.cranes and boom trucks. With the addition of Grove, the company is able to offer customers equipment and lifting solutions for virtually every construction application. The company also believes that the combination of the two companies will provide opportunities to capitalize on their respective strengths in systems, technologies and manufacturing expertise, and that this combination will create natural synergies in its world wideworldwide distribution and serv iceservice network.

The aggregate purchase price paid for Grove was $277.8 million. This includes the issuance of $70.0 million of the company'scompany’s common stock, the assumption of $202.4 million of Grove debt outstanding as of August 8, 2002, and direct acquisition costs of $5.4 million. In exchange for the outstanding shares of Grove common stock, the company issued approximately 2.2 million shares of the company'scompany’s common stock out of treasury with an average market price of $32.34 per share. The number of shares issued at the close of the transaction was calculated based on the average closing price of the company'scompany’s common stock for the ten consecutive trading days ending on and including the second day prior to the closing of the transaction. In addition, the company assumed all of Grove'sGrove’s outstanding liabilities contingencies and commitments (approximately $464.2$479.9 million including the outstanding debt)., contingencies and commitments. Substantially all of the assumed debt was refinanced.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

Total current assets of $326.5$304.5 million includes cash acquired of $13.8 million. The purchase consideration paid in excess of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated first to the identifiable intangible assets with the remaining excess accounted for as goodwill. The company obtained third party valuations of certain tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Based upon the appraisal report of identifiable intangible assets, the allocation was as follows: $26.0 million to trademarks and tradenames with an indefinite life; $11.9 million to an in-place distributor network with an indefinite life; $7.1 million to patents with a weighted-average 10-year life; and the remaining $32.9$73.7 million to goodwill. The $32.9$73.7 million of goodwill wasis included in the Crane segment. None of that amount is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The company also obtained third party valuations of the fair value of inventory and property, plant and equipment acquired. Based upon the apprai salappraisal reports of these assets, the company increased the value of inventory and property, plant and equipment by $3.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The $3.3 million fair value adjustment to inventory was charged to cost of goods sold during the fourth quarter of 2002 as the related inventory items were sold. The $1.1 million fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment is being depreciated over the estimated remaining useful lives of the property, plant and equipment.

During the first nine months of 2003, the company completed the purchase accounting related to the Grove acquisition.  During 2003 the company recorded $40.8 million of purchase accounting adjustments to the August 8, 2002 Grove opening balance sheet.  The purchase accounting adjustments relate to the following: $21.8 million to finalize the accounting for deferred income taxes, related primarily to the Grove non-U.S. operations; $12.4 million for consolidation of the National Crane facility located in Nebraska to the Grove facility located in Pennsylvania (see further detail in Note 9. “Plant Consolidation and Restructuring”); $2.1 million, $0.5 million and $0.9 million for additional accounts receivable, inventory and warranty reserves, respectively; $1.2 million related to severance and other employee related costs for headcount reductions at the Grove facilities in Europe (see further detail in Note 9. “Plant Consolidation and Restructuring”) and $1.9 million for other purchase accounting related items.

During 2002 the company also completed certain restructuring and integration activities relating to thisthe Grove acquisition.  The company recorded a charge totaling $12.1 million related to these restructuring and integration activities during 2002.  Of this amount $4.4 million was recorded in the opening balance sheet of Grove and $7.7 million was recorded as a charge to earnings during the fourth quarter of 2002.  The $4.4 million recorded in the opening balance sheet related to severance and other employee related costs for headcount reductions at Grove facilities.  See further detail in Note 9. "Plant“Plant Consolidation and Restructuring." The company has also developed and is finalizing certain other restructuring and integration activities relating to this acquisition, which will result in future adjustments to goodwill during the second quarter of 2003.”

The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 assumes the 2002 acquisition of Grove occurred as of January 1, 2002.

On April 8, 2002 the company purchased the remaining 50% interest in its joint venture Manitowoc Foodservice Europe (f/k/a Fabbrica Apparecchiature per la Produzione del Ghiaccio Srl), a manufacturer of ice machines based in Italy. The aggregate cash consideration paid by the company for the remaining interest was $3.4 million and resulted in $1.9$2.6 million of additional goodwill. The $1.9$2.6 million of goodwill wasis included in the Foodservice segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

3. Discontinued Operations

In connection with the Grove acquisition, the United States Department of Justice raised concerns about a possible reduction in competition in the United States boom truck market that could result from the acquisition.  In order to address these concerns, the company and Grove agreed with the Department of Justice that, following the completion of the Grove acquisition, the company would divest of either Manitowoc Boom Trucks, Inc. (Manitowoc Boom Trucks) or National Crane Corporation (Grove's(Grove’s boom truck business). On December 17, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Quantum Heavy Equipment, LLC (Quantum) to sell all of the outstanding stock of Manitowoc Boom Trucks. The Department of Justice approved the sale on December 30, 2002, and it was completed on December 31, 2002.

Cash proceeds from the sale of Manitowoc Boom Trucks, a business in the Crane segment, waswere approximately $13.2 million, which is subject to post-closing adjustments, and resulted in a loss on sale of approximately $32.9 million ($23.3 million net of tax) in the fourth quarter of 2002. The disposition represents a discontinued operation under SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, "Accounting“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."” Accordingly, results of Manitowoc Boom Trucks have been classified as discontinued for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002. The financial results

During the third quarter of 2003, the company and Quantum agreed to a final post-closing adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2003 does not include any resultssale of Manitowoc Boom Trucks.


  The agreement resulted in the company paying $4.7 million to Quantum during the third quarter of 2003.  This payment was largely the result of reduction in working capital of Manitowoc Boom Trucks from September 30, 2002 to December 31, 2002 for which the company already received the cash.  The agreement resulted in the company recording an additional charge for the sale of Manitowoc Boom Trucks of approximately $0.6 million ($0.4 million net of tax) during the second quarter of 2003.  This charge is recorded in loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The following selected financial data of Manitowoc Boom Trucks for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had

8

the business operated as a stand-alone entity.  There were no activity related to Manitowoc Boom Trucks during the three months ended September 30, 2003.  There were no general corporate expenses or interest expense allocated to discontinued operations during the period.periods.

On February 14, 2003, the company finalized the sale of Femco Machine Company, Inc. (Femco), the Crane segment'ssegment’s crane and excavator aftermarket replacement parts and industrial repair business, to a group of private investors led by the current Femco management and its employees. After the Grove acquisition, it was determined that Femco was not a core business to the Crane segment.  Cash proceeds from the sale of Femco were approximately $7.0 million, which includes $0.4 million of cash received by the company for post-closing adjustments, and resulted in a gain on sale of approximately $0.4 million ($0.3 million net of tax). The disposition of Femco represents a discontinued operation under SFAS No. 144. Results of Femco have been classified as discontinued, and the results for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 have been restated to exclude the results of Femco.  During December 2002, the company recorded a $3.4 million ($2.1 million net of tax) charge related to the decision to sell Femco. Of the charg e,charge, $2.2 million related to recording the net assets of Femco at estimated fair value less cost to sell. In addition, the company performed an impairment analysis of the Femco goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"” and determined that the entire $1.2 million of goodwill related to Femco was impaired. The $3.4 million charge was recorded in discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144.

The following selected financial data of Femco for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and the period from January 1, 2003 through February 14, 2003 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had the business operated as a stand-alone entity.  There was no activity related to Femco during the three months ended September 30, 2003.  There were no general corporate expenses or interest expense allocated to discontinued operations during any period.

9

4. Inventories

The components of inventory at March 31,September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:

Inventory is carried at lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for  91% and 86% of total inventory at March 31,for both September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.2002.  The remainder of the inventory is costed using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.

5. Stock-Based Compensation

At March 31, 2003, the company has three stock-based compensation plans.

The company accounts for these plansits stock options under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,"” and related Interpretations.  No stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock options is reflected in earnings, as all option grants under those plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.  During the threenine months ended March 31,September 2003, the company recognized approximately $0.1$0.2 million of compensation expense related to restricted stock which was issued during 2002.  The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, "Accounting“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"” to stock based employee compensation for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002.

The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of SFAS No. 123” was issued. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. In addition, SFAS No. 148 requires prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the effects on reported net income of an entity’s method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148.

10

6.  Contingencies and Significant Estimates

The company has been identified as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) in connection with the Lemberger Landfill Superfund Site near Manitowoc, Wisconsin. Approximately 150 potentially responsible parties have been identified as having shipped hazardous materials to this site. Eleven of those, including the company, have formed the Lemberger Site Remediation Group and have successfully negotiated with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to fund the cleanup and settle their potential liability at this site. Recent estimates indicate that the total costs to clean up this site are approximately $30 million.  However the ultimate allocations of cost for this site are not yet final. Although liability is joint and several, the company'scompany’s share of liability is estimated to be 11% of the total cost. Prior to December 31, 1996, the company accrued $3.3 million in connect ionconnection with this matter. The amounts the company has spent each year from 1999 through March 31,September 30, 2003 to comply with its portion of the cleanup costs have not been material. Remediation work at the site has been substantially completed, with only long-term pumping and treating of groundwater and site maintenance remaining. The company'scompany’s remaining estimated liability for this matter, included in other current and non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31,September 30, 2003, is $0.8$0.7 million. Based on the size of the company'scompany’s current allocation of liability at this site, the existence of other viable potentially responsible parties and current reserves, the company does not believe that any liability imposed in connection with this site will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

At certain of the company'scompany’s other facilities, the company has identified potential contaminants in soil and groundwater. The ultimate cost of any remediation required will depend upon the results of future investigation. Based upon available information, the ultimate costs are not expected to be material to the company.

The company believes that it has obtained and is in substantial compliance with those material environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its various businesses. Based on the facts presently known, the company does not expect environmental compliance costs to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

As of March 31,September 30, 2003, various product-related lawsuits were pending. To the extent permitted under applicable law, all of these are insured with self-insurance retention levels. Prior to October 1, 2002, the company'scompany’s retention levels were $0.1 million per occurrence for Potain crane products; $1.0 million per occurrence for all other crane products (except for Grove); $1.0 million per occurrence for Foodservice products during 1990 to 1996; and $0.1 million per occurrence for Foodservice products during 1997 to present. Prior to the acquisition, a former owner of Grove purchased an insurance policy which effectively indemnified itGrove against claims arising prior to October 1, 1997, up to an aggregate loss limit of $85.0 million. Beginning October 1, 1997, Grove'sGrove’s insurance included self-insurance retention levels of $2.0 million per occurrence with an aggregate loss limit of $15.0 million per year for 1997 through 2000 and self-insurance retention levels of $3.0 million per occurrence with an aggregate loss limit of $15.0 milli onmillion per year for 2000 through October 2002. Effective October 1, 2002, the company adjusted its self-insurance retention limits for all United States crane product liability claims, including Grove, to $2.0 million per occurrence with an aggregate loss limit of $15.0 million per year.year (before excess umbrella coverage). All non-United States crane product liability claims (other than Potain) are fully insured or reserved with a small deductible payable by the company. The Potain and Foodservice self-insurance retention levels remained consistent. Prior to October 1, 2002, the insurer'sinsurer’s annual contribution is limited to $25 million for Marine businesses, $25 million (1997-1998) and $50 million (1998-October 1, 2002) for Foodservice and Crane (other than Grove) businesses, and $100 million for Grove. Effective October 1, 2002, the company adjusted the insurer'sinsurer’s annual contribution limit to $100 million for all Foodservice and Crane businesses, whereas the insurer'sinsurer’s annual contribution limit for Marine cases remained at $25 million.

Product liability reserves in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31,September 30, 2003 were $36.5$33.1 million; $14.6$10.5 million reserved specifically for cases and $21.9$22.6 million for claims incurred but not reported which were estimated using actuarial methods. Based on the company'scompany’s experience in defending product liability claims, management believes the current reserves are adequate for estimated settlements on aggregate self-insured claims and insured claims. Any recoveries from insurance carriers are dependent upon the legal sufficiency of claims and the solvency of insurance carriers.

At March 31,September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the company had reserved $38.3$41.6 million and $38.5 million,

11

respectively, for warranty claims included in product warranties and other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of these warranties and other related claims involve matters in dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation. Infrequently a material warranty issue can arise which is beyond the scope of the company'scompany’s historical experience.

It is reasonably possible that the estimates for environmental remediation, product liability and warranty costs may change in the near future based upon new information that may arise or matters that are beyond the scope of the company'scompany’s historical experience. Presently, there are no reliable methods to estimate the amount of any such potential changes.

The company is also involved in various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business, including numerous lawsuits involving asbestos-related claims in which the company is one of numerous defendants. After taking into consideration legal counsel'scounsel’s evaluation of such actions, the current political environment with respect to asbestos related claims, and the liabilities accrued with respect to such matters, in the opinion of management, ultimate resolution is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the company.

At March 31,September 30, 2003 the company is contingently liable under open standby letters of credit issued by the company'scompany’s bank in favor of third parties totaling $30.8 million.

$25.7 million primarily related to business in the Marine segment.

7.  Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation of the average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share.

8. Guarantees

As of March 31,September 30, 2003, the company offers certain buyback commitments and guaranteed residual values on cranes and indemnifications under its accounts receivable factoring arrangements.  Effective January 1, 2003, the company adopted the initial recognition and measurement provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No.45, "Guarantor's“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others."”  Therefore, for all indemnifications or guarantees meeting the FIN No. 45 requirements of an obligation and issued by the company beginning January 1, 2003, the company is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of such obligations.  The adoption of the initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN No. 45 did not have a material impact on the company'scompany’s financial statements.