UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 logo2015aa15.jpg
FORM 10-Q
 
ý     Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017
 
or
 
o        Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the transition period from                to               
 
Commission File Number
1-11978 
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
Wisconsin 39-0448110
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
2400 South 44th Street,  
Manitowoc, Wisconsin 54221-006654220
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(920) 684-4410
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
   
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.      o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No ý

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the most recent practicable date, was 138,772,087.140,605,924.


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial Statements 

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016
(Unaudited)
(In$ in millions, except per-share and average shares data)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Net sales$349.8
 $438.2
 $1,234.9
 $1,322.6
Cost of sales308.3
 368.3
 1,023.3
 1,082.4
Gross profit41.5
 69.9
 211.6
 240.2
Operating costs and expenses:       
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses73.0
 77.6
 218.8
 239.8
Asset impairment expense96.9
 —
 96.9
 —
Amortization expense0.7
 0.8
 2.2
 2.3
Restructuring expense3.9
 (0.4) 17.1
 0.4
Other0.5
 0.1
 2.3
 —
Total operating costs and expenses175.0
 78.1
 337.3
 242.5
        
Operating loss(133.5) (8.2) (125.7) (2.3)
        
Other income (expense): 
  
    
Interest expense(10.0) (24.0) (29.6) (71.3)
Amortization of deferred financing fees(0.5) (1.1) (1.8) (3.2)
Loss on debt extinguishment—
 —
 (76.3) —
Other income (expense) - net0.5
 (2.4) 3.7
 0.2
Total other expense(10.0) (27.5) (104.0) (74.3)
Loss from continuing operations before taxes(143.5) (35.7) (229.7) (76.6)
(Benefit) provision for taxes on income(5.3) (6.1) 116.9
 (17.3)
Loss from continuing operations(138.2) (29.6) (346.6) (59.3)
        
Discontinued operations: 
  
    
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of $1.8, $17.2, $0.5 and $41.9, respectively(1.8) 34.4
 (5.8) 79.0
Net (loss) income$(140.0) $4.8
 $(352.4) $19.7
        
Basic (loss) income per common share: 
  
    
Loss from continuing operations$(1.00) $(0.22) $(2.52) $(0.44)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations(0.01) 0.25
 (0.04) 0.58
Basic (loss) income per common share$(1.01) $0.04
 $(2.56) $0.14
        
Diluted (loss) income per common share: 
  
    
Loss from continuing operations$(1.00) $(0.22) $(2.52) $(0.44)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations(0.01) 0.25
 (0.04) 0.58
Diluted (loss) income per common share:$(1.01) $0.04
 $(2.56) $0.14
        
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic138,422,953
 136,164,053
 137,390,809
 135,983,603
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted138,422,953
 136,164,053
 137,390,809
 135,983,603
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net sales$394.6
 $457.7
 $700.4
 $885.1
Cost of sales318.3
 370.4
 572.2
 718.1
Gross profit76.3
 87.3
 128.2
 167.0
Operating costs and expenses:       
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses60.4
 73.4
 123.7
 145.8
Amortization of intangible assets0.3
 0.8
 0.7
 1.5
Restructuring expense5.9
 8.8
 17.6
 13.2
Other operating (income) expense - net(0.2) 0.4
 —
 1.8
Total operating costs and expenses66.4
 83.4
 142.0
 162.3
Operating income (loss)9.9
 3.9
 (13.8) 4.7
Other income (expense): 
  
    
Interest expense(9.7) (9.9) (19.8) (19.6)
Amortization of deferred financing fees(0.4) (0.4) (0.9) (1.3)
Loss on debt extinguishment—
 —
 —
 (76.3)
Other income - net3.2
 2.1
 3.0
 3.2
Total other expense(6.9) (8.2) (17.7) (94.0)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes3.0
 (4.3) (31.5) (89.3)
Provision for taxes on income2.3
 0.7
 3.8
 108.4
Income (loss) from continuing operations0.7
 (5.0) (35.3) (197.7)
Discontinued operations: 
  
    
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of $0.0, $0.0, $0.0 and $(1.3), respectively(0.2) (0.8) (0.2) (4.0)
Net income (loss)$0.5
 $(5.8) $(35.5) $(201.7)
        
Per Share Data       
Basic income (loss) per common share: 
  
    
Income (loss) from continuing operations$0.00
 $(0.04) $(0.25) $(1.44)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(0.00) (0.01) (0.00) (0.03)
Basic income (loss) per common share$0.00
 $(0.04) $(0.25) $(1.47)
        
Diluted income (loss) per common share: 
  
    
Income (loss) from continuing operations$0.00
 $(0.04) $(0.25) $(1.44)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(0.00) (0.01) (0.00) (0.03)
Diluted income (loss) per common share$0.00
 $(0.04) $(0.25) $(1.47)
        
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic140,437,702
 137,138,220
 140,260,690
 136,869,066
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted142,618,685
 137,138,220
 140,260,690
 136,869,066
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016
(Unaudited)
(In$ in millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net income (loss)$0.5
 $(5.8) $(35.5) $(201.7)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax       
Unrealized income (loss) on derivatives, net of income tax provision of $0.0, $0.0, $0.0 and $1.1, respectively0.1
 (0.1) 0.6
 1.5
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of income tax provision of $0.4, $0.0, $0.8 and $0.0, respectively0.5
 1.2
 1.1
 2.4
Foreign currency translation adjustments23.1
 (17.4) 33.2
 31.8
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax23.7
 (16.3) 34.9
 35.7
Comprehensive income (loss)$24.2
 $(22.1) $(0.6) $(166.0)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Net (loss) income$(140.0) $4.8
 $(352.4) $19.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax       
Unrealized (loss) income on derivatives, net of income tax provision (benefit) of $0.0, $(0.2), $0.0 and $(0.4), respectively0.2
 (0.3) 1.7
 (0.1)
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of income tax provision of $0.0, $0.5, $0.0 and $1.5, respectively1.1
 1.4
 3.5
 4.2
Foreign currency translation adjustments5.7
 (18.5) 37.5
 (72.7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax7.0
 (17.4) 42.7
 (68.6)
Comprehensive loss$(133.0) $(12.6) $(309.7) $(48.9)
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.




THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016
(Unaudited)
(In$ in millions, except share data)
September 30,
2016		 December 31,
2015		June 30,
2017		 December 31,
2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets: 
  
 
  
Cash and temporary investments$42.9
 $31.5
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $10.0 and $12.8, respectively132.5
 155.7
Cash and cash equivalents$26.3
 $69.9
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $11.0 and $11.1, respectively181.6
 134.4
Inventories — net496.3
 452.6
476.2
 429.0
Notes receivable — net60.4
 65.1
47.0
 62.4
Other current assets54.5
 45.9
55.4
 54.0
Current assets of discontinued operations—
 254.2
Total current assets786.6
 1,005.0
786.5
 749.7
      
Property, plant and equipment — net315.3
 410.7
313.7
 308.8
Goodwill309.8
 306.5
312.5
 299.6
Other intangible assets — net118.9
 119.3
118.7
 114.1
Other long-term assets63.1
 191.2
44.3
 45.6
Long-term assets held for sale5.5
 5.5
Long-term assets of discontinued operations—
 1,501.5
Total assets$1,599.2
 $3,539.7
$1,575.7
 $1,517.8
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$350.3
 $436.3
$370.9
 $321.2
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt15.3
 67.2
11.0
 12.4
Product warranties38.4
 35.9
32.5
 36.5
Customer advances10.3
 10.3
23.0
 21.0
Product liabilities21.4
 21.9
22.3
 21.7
Current liabilities of discontinued operations—
 312.0
Total current liabilities435.7
 883.6
459.7
 412.8
Non-Current Liabilities: 
  
 
  
Long-term debt293.0
 1,330.4
278.1
 269.1
Deferred income taxes41.6
 25.6
41.3
 36.6
Pension obligations79.6
 99.4
86.0
 86.4
Postretirement health and other benefit obligations36.7
 44.4
36.4
 38.0
Long-term deferred revenue23.6
 29.7
19.0
 20.3
Other non-current liabilities65.5
 87.3
59.1
 64.1
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations—
 219.8
Total non-current liabilities540.0
 1,836.6
519.9
 514.5
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

 

Total Stockholders' Equity: 
  
Common stock (300,000,000 shares authorized, 163,175,928 shares issued, 138,772,087 and 136,617,161 shares outstanding, respectively)1.4
 1.4
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

 

Stockholders' Equity: 
  
Preferred stock (authorized 3,500,000 shares of $.01 par value; none outstanding)—
 —
Common stock (300,000,000 shares authorized, 163,175,928 shares issued, 140,605,924 and 139,841,214 shares outstanding, respectively)1.4
 1.4
Additional paid-in capital566.0
 558.0
571.7
 567.6
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(116.4) (207.8)(128.0) (162.9)
Retained earnings238.3
 539.5
211.8
 247.3
Treasury stock, at cost (24,403,841 and 26,558,767 shares, respectively)(65.8) (71.6)
Treasury stock, at cost (22,570,004 and 23,334,714 shares, respectively)(60.8) (62.9)
Total stockholders' equity623.5
 819.5
596.1
 590.5
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$1,599.2
 $3,539.7
$1,575.7
 $1,517.8
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016
(Unaudited)
(In$ in millions)
 
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2017 2016
Cash Flows from Operations: 
  
Net loss$(35.5) $(201.7)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used for operating activities of continuing operations: 
  
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes0.2
 4.0
Depreciation19.9
 23.6
Amortization of intangible assets0.7
 1.5
Amortization of deferred financing fees0.9
 1.3
Deferred income taxes—
 111.4
Loss on early debt extinguishment—
 15.4
Gain (loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment(1.0) 1.7
Other4.4
 (4.5)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of business acquisitions and divestitures: 
  
Accounts receivable(40.2) (33.3)
Inventories(34.6) (39.9)
Notes receivable9.5
 7.5
Other assets(4.4) (9.7)
Accounts payable46.8
 (40.8)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(11.1) (15.3)
Net cash used for operating activities of continuing operations(44.4) (178.8)
Net cash used for operating activities of discontinued operations(0.2) (47.7)
Net cash used for operating activities(44.6) (226.5)
    
Cash Flows from Investing: 
  
Capital expenditures(11.9) (24.7)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets5.3
 0.9
Other1.3
 0.3
Net cash used for investing activities of continuing operations(5.3) (23.5)
Net cash used for investing activities of discontinued operations—
 (2.4)
Net cash used for investing activities(5.3) (25.9)
    
Cash Flows from Financing: 
  
Proceeds from revolving credit facility10.3
 —
Payments on long-term debt(4.8) (1,365.9)
Proceeds from long-term debt—
 261.1
Payments on notes financing - net(2.9) (5.0)
Debt issuance costs—
 (8.3)
Exercises of stock options2.9
 2.5
       Dividend from spun-off subsidiary—
 1,361.7
       Cash transferred to spun-off subsidiary—
 (17.7)
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations5.5
 228.4
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations—
 0.2
Net cash provided by financing activities5.5
 228.6
    
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash0.8
 1.2
    
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(43.6) (22.6)
Balance at beginning of period, including cash of discontinued operations of $0.0 and $31.969.9
 63.4
Balance at end of period$26.3
 $40.8
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operations: 
  
Net (loss) income$(352.4) $19.7
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash used for operating activities of continuing operations: 
  
Asset impairment96.9
 —
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes5.8
 (79.0)
Depreciation34.9
 36.5
Amortization of intangible assets2.2
 2.3
Amortization of deferred financing fees1.8
 3.2
Deferred income taxes127.8
 33.8
Loss on early debt extinguishment15.4
 —
Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment1.1
 (0.3)
Other(2.7) 8.7
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of business acquisitions and divestitures: 
  
Accounts receivable25.3
 (12.8)
Inventories(36.2) (103.4)
Other assets13.1
 16.9
Accounts payable(87.0) (25.8)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(10.0) 23.4
Net cash used for operating activities of continuing operations(164.0) (76.8)
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations(65.5) 2.9
Net cash used for operating activities(229.5) (73.9)
    
Cash Flows from Investing: 
  
Capital expenditures(34.8) (31.9)
Proceeds from fixed assets2.3
 6.2
Other(0.3) 3.2
Net cash used for investing activities of continuing operations(32.8) (22.5)
Net cash used for investing activities of discontinued operations(2.4) (10.1)
Net cash used for investing activities(35.2) (32.6)
    
Cash Flows from Financing: 
  
Proceeds from revolving credit facility20.0
 169.0
Payments on long-term debt(1,372.0) (47.6)
Proceeds from long-term debt262.0
 1.6
Payments on notes financing - net(8.7) (10.0)
Debt issuance costs(8.9) —
Exercises of stock options6.4
 4.0
       Dividend from spun-off subsidiary1,361.7
 —
       Cash transferred to spun-off subsidiary(17.7) —
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations242.8
 117.0
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations0.2
 0.1
Net cash provided by financing activities243.0
 117.1
    
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash1.2
 (3.4)
    
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(20.5) 7.2
Balance at beginning of period, including cash of discontinued operations of $31.9 and $16.563.4
 68.0
Balance at end of period, including cash of discontinued operations of $0.0 and $47.3$42.9
 $75.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016
1. Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (“Manitowoc,” “MTW” and the “Company”) is a leading provider of engineered lifting equipment for the global construction industry, including lattice-boom cranes, tower cranes, mobile telescopic cranes and boom trucks. The Company has one reportable segment, the Crane business. The segment was identified using the “management approach,” which designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the cash flows for the same nine-monthsix-month periods and the financial position at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, and except as otherwise discussed, such adjustments consist of only those of a normal recurring nature. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and do not contain information included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations dealing with interim financial statements. However, the Company believes that the disclosures made in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, theMTW's Board of Directors of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (“Manitowoc,” “MTW,” and the “Company”) approved the tax-free spin-off of the Company’s foodservice business (“MFS”) into an independent, public company (the “Spin-Off”). To consummate the Spin-Off, the Board declared a pro rata dividend of MFS common stock to MTW’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2016 (the "Record Date"“Record Date”), payable on March 4, 2016. Each MTW stockholder received one share of MFS common stock for every share of MTW common stock held as of the close of business on the Record Date.
In these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, unless otherwise indicated, references to Manitowoc, MTW and the Company refer to The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Spin-Off, or in the case of information as of dates or for periods prior to the Spin-Off, the consolidated entities of the Crane business and certain other assets and liabilities that were historically held at the MTW corporate level but were specifically identifiable and attributable to the Crane business.
As a result of the Spin-Off, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial information reflect MFS operations, assets and liabilities and cash flows as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Refer to Note 2, "Discontinued“Discontinued Operations,"” for additional information regarding the Spin-Off.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. All dollar amounts, except share and per share amounts, are in millions of dollars throughout the tables included in these notes, unless otherwise indicated.
During the first quarter of 2016, in conjunction with the Spin-Off, the Company identified an out-of-period adjustment related to deferred tax assets, which originated prior to 2010, whereby the Company had understated the deferred tax assets by $6.2 million at each balance sheet date prior to March 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016, the Company recorded an adjustment to the deferred tax assets and the income tax provision on continuing operations to record the out-of-period adjustment.  Additionally, the Company identified an out-of-period adjustment in MFS’ deferred tax assets, which also originated prior to 2010, whereby the Company had understated the deferred tax assets by $2.9 million at each balance sheet date prior to March 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016, prior to the Spin-Off, the Company recorded an adjustment to the deferred tax assets and the income tax provision on discontinued operations to correct the out-of-period adjustment.  The Company does not believe that these adjustments were material to its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company identified two adjustmentsan adjustment to the previously issued financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2016. In evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated, the Company considered the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 250, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1, "Assessing Materiality." The Company determined that these errors were not material to the Company's prior interim period consolidated financial statements and therefore, amending the previously filed report was not required. However, the Company determined that the impact of the


corrections would be too significant to record within the second quarter of 2016. As such, the revision for the corrections is reflected in the financial information of the applicable prior periods.
The adjustments identified during the second quarter of 2016 were as follows:
Adjustmentadjustment related to accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL"(“AOCL”), whereby the Company had understated loss on debt extinguishment by $4.3 million, overstated income tax expense by $0.8 million and understated loss from continuing operations by $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2016. The adjustment also resulted in an overstatement of AOCL and understatement of retained earnings by $2.6 million as of March 31, 2016.
Adjustment relatedIn evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated, the Company considered the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1, “Assessing Materiality.” The Company determined that these errors were not material to the classificationCompany's prior interim period consolidated financial statements and therefore, amending the previously filed report was not required. However, the Company determined that the impact of income tax expense between continuing operations and discontinued operationsthe corrections would be too significant to record within the second quarter of 2016. As such, the revision for the correction was reflected in the financial information for the first quarter of 2016.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company identified an adjustment to the previously issued financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015,2016, related to a non-cash reclassification between continuing and discontinued operations within the operating section of the Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016, whereby the Company had understated the benefitchange in accrued expenses and other liabilities and net cash used for taxes onoperating activities of continuing operations was understated by $16.2 million, and understated the income tax provision onnet cash used for operating activities of discontinued operationsoperating activities was overstated by $2.1$16.2 million. In evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated,


the Company considered the guidance in ASC Topic 250 and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1. The Company determined that these errors were not material to the Company's prior interim period consolidated financial statements, and therefore, amending the previously filed reports was not required. The revision for the correction was reflected in the financial information for the first quarter of 2016.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company changed its method of inventory costing for certain inventory to the FIFO method from the LIFO method. The Company applied this change in method of inventory costing by retrospectively adjusting the prior period financial statements. As a result of the retrospective adjustment of the change in accounting principle, certain amounts in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were adjusted.
A summary of the adjustments on the impacted financial statement line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as revised and as previously presented in the March 31,June 30, 2016 Form 10-Q is as follows:
follows ($ in millions):
 Three Months Ended
March 31, 2016		 Three Months Ended
March 31, 2015
 As revised As previously presented As revised As previously presented
Loss on debt extinguishment$(76.3) $(72.0) $—
 $—
Loss from continuing operations before taxes on income(82.8) (78.5) (32.9) (32.9)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income121.5
 122.3
 (9.5) (7.4)
Loss from continuing operations(204.3) (200.8) (23.4) (25.5)
Discontinued operations:       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3.2) (3.2) 15.0
 17.1
Net loss$(207.5) $(204.0) $(8.4) $(8.4)
        
Loss per common share - basic and diluted       
  Loss from continuing operations$(1.50) $(1.47) $(0.17) $(0.19)
  (Loss) income from discontinued operations(0.02) (0.02) 0.11
 0.13
  Loss per common share$(1.52) $(1.49) $(0.06) $(0.06)
During the third quarter of 2016, the Company identified one adjustment to the previously issued financial statements whereby the Company, at each balance sheet date since March 2014, incorrectly classified a note receivable balance from Manitowoc's former joint venture partner Manitowoc Dong Yue as restricted cash. In evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated, the Company considered the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 250, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1, "Assessing Materiality." The Company determined that this error was not material to the Company's prior interim and annual period consolidated financial statements and therefore, amending the previously filed reports was not required. However, the Company determined that for purposes of comparability, the revision for the correction is reflected in the financial information of the applicable prior periods. The impact to the December 31, 2015 balance sheet is a reclassification of $14.0 million of restricted cash to $5.4 million in short-term notes receivable and $8.6 million of long-term notes receivable.
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
  As previously presented Impact of change to FIFO As revised As previously presented Impact of change to FIFO As revised
Cost of sales $369.5
 $0.9
 $370.4
 $715.0
 $3.1
 $718.1
Operating income (loss) 4.8
 (0.9) 3.9
 7.8
 (3.1) 4.7
Loss on debt extinguishment —
   —
 (76.3) —
 (76.3)
Loss from continuing operations before taxes on income (3.4) (0.9) (4.3) (86.2) (3.1) (89.3)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income 0.7
 —
 0.7
 122.2
 (13.8) 108.4
Loss from continuing operations (4.1) (0.9) (5.0) (208.4) 10.7
 (197.7)
Discontinued operations:            
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (0.8) —
 (0.8) (4.0) —
 (4.0)
Net loss $(4.9) $(0.9) $(5.8) $(212.4) $10.7
 $(201.7)
             
Loss per common share - basic and diluted            
Loss from continuing operations $(0.03) $(0.01) $(0.04) $(1.52) $0.08
 $(1.44)
Loss from discontinued operations (0.01) —
 (0.01) (0.03) —
 (0.03)
Loss per common share $(0.04) $(0.01) $(0.04) $(1.55) $0.08
 $(1.47)
2. Discontinued Operations
On March 4, 2016, Manitowoc completed the Spin-Off of MFS. The financial results of MFS are presented as income (loss)loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table presents the financial results of MFS through the date of the Spin-Off for the indicated periodsperiod and dodoes not include corporate overhead allocations:


Major classes of line items constituting earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes related to MFS             
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(in millions) 2016 2015 2016 2015
($ in millions) 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Net sales $—
 $425.3
 $219.6
 $1,178.4
 $—
 $219.6
 
             
Cost of sales —
 289.5
 141.5
 807.9
 —
 141.5
 
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses —
 66.8
 48.3
 207.9
 —
 48.3
 
Amortization expense —
 7.8
 5.2
 23.5
 —
 5.2
 
Restructuring expense —
 0.8
 0.3
 1.2
 —
 0.3
 
Separation expense —
 10.0
 27.7
 19.8
 0.7
 27.7
 
Other —
 —
 —
 0.5
Total operating costs and expenses —
 374.9
 223.0
 1,060.8
 0.7
 223.0
 
(Loss) earnings from operations —
 50.4
 (3.4) 117.6
Other (expense) income —
 1.2
 (1.8) 3.4
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes —
 51.6
 (5.2) 121.0
(Benefit) provision for taxes on earnings 1.8
 17.2
 0.5
 41.9
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes $(1.8) $34.4
 $(5.7) $79.1
Loss from operations (0.7) (3.4) 
Other expense —
 (1.8) 
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes (0.7) (5.2) 
Benefit for taxes on earnings —
 (1.3) 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes $(0.7) $(3.9) 
 
The assetsFor both the three and liabilities of MFS have been classified assix months ended June 30, 2017, net losses recorded by the Company related to discontinued operations as of December 31, 2015. No assets or liabilities of MFS are reflected on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016. These amounts consistedfrom various businesses disposed in prior periods were $0.2 million. For each of the following carrying amountsthree and six months ended June 30, 2016, net losses recorded by the Company for various other businesses disposed of in each major class at December 31, 2015:
Carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of discontinued operations related to MFS  
(in millions)  December 31,
2015
Assets   
Cash and temporary investments  $31.9
Restricted cash  0.6
Accounts receivable - net  63.8
Inventories - net  145.9
Other current assets  12.0
Property, plant and equipment - net  116.3
Goodwill  845.8
Other intangible assets - net  519.5
Other long-term assets  16.2
Long-term assets held for sale  3.7
Total major classes of assets of discontinued operations  $1,755.7
    
Liabilities   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  $271.6
Current portion of long-term debt  0.4
Other current liabilities  40.0
Long-term debt  2.3
Deferred income taxes  167.9
Pension  29.3
Postretirement health and other benefit obligations  3.0
Other non-current liabilities  17.3
Total major classes of liabilities of discontinued operations  $531.8


prior periods were $0.1 million.
Manitowoc and MFS entered into several agreements in connection with the separation,Spin-Off, including a transition services agreement ("TSA"(“TSA”), separation and distribution agreement, tax matters agreement, intellectual property matters agreement and an employee matters agreement.
Pursuant to the TSA, Manitowoc, MFS and their respective subsidiaries are providingprovided various services to each other on an interim, transitional basis. Services being provided by Manitowoc include,included, among others, finance, information technology and certain other administrative services. The services generally commenced on March 4, 2016 and are expected to terminateall have terminated generally within 12 months of that date. Billings by Manitowoc under the TSA arewere recorded as a reduction of the costs to provide the respective service in the applicable expense category.
TheSeparation costs recorded by the Company did not record any separation costsduring the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the Spin-Off during the three months ended September 30, 2016.were negligible. During the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015,2016, the Company recorded $10.0 million of separation costs related to the Spin-Off. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 the Company recorded $27.7$0.7 million and $19.8$27.7 million respectively, of separation costs related to the Spin-Off. Separation costs consistconsisted primarily of professional and consulting fees and arewere included in the results of discontinued operations.
3. Inventories
The components of inventories as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:
($ in millions) June 30,
2017		 December 31,
2016
Inventories:  
  
Raw materials $123.9
 $109.3
Work-in-process 127.9
 88.4
Finished goods 269.1
 270.9
Total inventories 520.9
 468.6
Excess and obsolete inventory reserve (44.7) (39.6)
Inventories — net $476.2
 $429.0
In eachthe fourth quarter of 2016, the Company changed its method of inventory costing from LIFO to FIFO for certain of its inventory. See footnote 1 for further information.
4. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable balances as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, consisted primarily of amounts due to the Company's captive finance company in China and the remaining balance on the note from the 2014 sale of Manitowoc Dong Yue. As of


June 30, 2017, the Company had current and long-term notes receivable in the amount of $47.0 million and $18.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had current and long-term notes receivable in the amount of $62.4 million and $21.1 million, respectively. Long-term notes receivable are included within other long-term assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2017 are as follows:
($ in millions) Total
Balance as of January 1, 2016 $306.5
Foreign currency impact (6.9)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 299.6
Foreign currency impact 12.9
Balance as of June 30, 2017 $312.5
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” for its single reporting unit, Cranes.
The Company performs an annual impairment review during the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. There have been no impairment indicators since the fourth quarter of 2016, therefore no impairment review has occurred. The Company performs the impairment review for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets using a fair-value method based on the present value of future cash flows, which involves management’s judgments and assumptions about the amounts of those cash flows and the discount rates used. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the nine months ended September 30, 2016reporting unit, including recorded goodwill, or indefinite-lived intangible asset. The intangible asset is then subject to risk of write-down to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
A considerable amount of management judgment and 2015,assumptions are required in performing the impairment test, principally in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. While the Company recorded $0.1 millionbelieves the judgments and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair value and, therefore, impairment charges could be required. Weakening industry or economic trends, disruptions to the Company's business, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in expensesthe use of variousthe assets or in entity structure may adversely impact the assumptions used in the valuations. The Company continually monitors market conditions and determines if any additional interim reviews of goodwill, other businesses disposedintangibles or long-lived assets are warranted. In the event the Company determines that assets are impaired in the future, the Company would recognize a non-cash impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Results of priorOperations.
Other intangible assets with definite lives continue to 2014, consisting primarilybe amortized over their estimated useful lives. Definite lived intangible assets are also subject to impairment testing whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of administrative costs. There were no expenses recorded inthe assets may not be recoverable.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value of the Company’s intangible assets other than goodwill at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:
  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
($ in millions) 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
Trademarks and tradenames $96.8
 $—
 $96.8
 $92.4
 $—
 $92.4
Customer relationships 10.6
 (8.6) 2.0
 10.3
 (7.8) 2.5
Patents 29.8
 (28.8) 1.0
 28.5
 (27.4) 1.1
Engineering drawings 10.5
 (10.4) 0.1
 10.0
 (9.9) 0.1
Distribution network 18.9
 (0.1) 18.8
 18.0
 —
 18.0
Other intangibles 0.3
 (0.3) —
 0.2
 (0.2) —
Total $166.9
 $(48.2) $118.7
 $159.4
 $(45.3) $114.1


Amortization expense for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.3 million and 2015 related$0.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The Company also reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company conducts its long-lived asset impairment analyses in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-5, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” ASC Topic 360-10-5 requires the Company to thosegroup assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other businesses. This is presentedassets and liabilities and to evaluate the asset group against the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line depreciation method for informational purposes onlyfinancial reporting and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had the businesses operated as stand-alone entities.on accelerated methods for income tax purposes. 
3. Acquisitions6. Accounts Payable and DisposalsAccrued Expenses
Foodservice businessesAccounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:
On October 21, 2015, MFS acquired the remaining 50.0% of outstanding shares of a joint venture in Thailand. Welbilt Thailand
($ in millions) June 30,
2017		 December 31,
2016
Trade accounts payable $215.2
 $157.7
Employee-related expenses 35.4
 28.1
Accrued vacation 24.0
 21.8
Miscellaneous accrued expenses 96.3
 113.6
Total $370.9
 $321.2
7. Debt
Outstanding debt at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is a manufacturer of kitchen equipment in Southeast Asia. summarized as follows:
($ in millions) June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Revolving credit facility $10.3
 $—
Senior secured second lien notes due 2021 250.9
 249.8
Other 31.4
 35.7
Deferred financing costs (3.5) (4.0)
Total debt 289.1
 281.5
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt (11.0) (12.4)
Long-term debt $278.1
 $269.1
The purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $5.3 million. Allocationbalance sheet values of the purchase price resulted in $1.412.750% senior secured lien notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes") as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are not equal to the face value of the 2021 Notes, $260.0 million, because of goodwill and $4.2 million of intangible assets. The results of Welbilt Thailand wereoriginal issue discounts included in the resultsapplicable balance sheet values.
As of MFS sinceJune 30, 2017, the dateCompany had outstanding $31.4 million of acquisition,other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.43%. This debt includes balances on local credit lines and thus, are now classified in discontinued operations.capital lease obligations.
On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a $225.0 million Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (as amended, the “ABL Revolving Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as joint lead arrangers. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility capacity calculation is defined in the related credit agreement and is dependent on the fair value of inventory and fixed assets of the loan parties, which secure the borrowings. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility has a term of 5 years and includes a $75.0 million letter of credit sublimit, $10.0 million of which can be applied to the German borrower.
In October 2016, the ABL Revolving Credit Facility was amended to accommodate certain previously restricted activities related to the relocation of the Company’s manufacturing operations from Manitowoc, Wisconsin to Shady Grove, Pennsylvania. Among other things, the amendment allows the Company to transfer, sell and/or impair fixed assets located at the Wisconsin facility with limited impact on the availability under the facility.
In April 2017, the ABL Revolving Credit Facility was amended to modify several definitions regarding eligible equipment and inventory as it relates to a key financing partner of the Company. The amendment is expected to continue to have, a minimal impact on the Company’s daily operations and borrowing limits.


As of June 30, 2017, the Company's outstanding balance on the ABL Revolving Credit Facility was $10.3 million. The Company had no borrowings on the ABL Revolving Credit Facility at December 7, 2015, Manitowoc sold31, 2016. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the highest daily borrowing was $41.6 million and the average borrowing was $21.6 million, while the average annual interest rate was 3.31%. The interest rate of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility fluctuates based on excess availability. As of June 30, 2017, the spreads for LIBOR and Prime borrowings were 1.50% and 0.50%, respectively, with excess availability of approximately $144.2 million, which represents revolver borrowing capacity of $168.9 million less borrowings of $10.3 million and U.S. letters of credit outstanding of $14.4 million.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility replaced the Company’s prior $1,050.0 million Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Prior Senior Credit Facility”). The Prior Senior Credit Facility included three different loan facilities: a non-material MFS subsidiary, Kysor Panel Systems,$500.0 million revolving facility and two term loans in the aggregate amount of $550.0 million.
In the first quarter of 2016, the Company terminated the Prior Senior Credit Facility along with $175.0 million notional amount of float-to-fixed interest rate swaps related to one of its prior term loans, resulting in a manufacturerloss of wood frame and high-density rail panel systems for walk-in freezers and coolers$5.9 million for the retailwrite-off of deferred financing expenses and convenience-store markets. The sale price$4.3 million for the transaction was approximately $85termination of interest rate swaps.
On February 18, 2016, the Company entered into an indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trust and collateral agent, and sold $260.0 million with cash proceeds receivedaggregate principal amount of approximately $78its 2021 Notes. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. The 2021 Notes were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.
Both the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and 2021 Notes include customary covenants and events of default which include, without limitation, restrictions on indebtedness, capital expenditures, restricted payments, disposals, investments and acquisitions.
Additionally, the ABL Revolving Credit Facility contains a Fixed Charge Coverage springing financial covenant, which measures the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other adjustments as defined in the related credit agreement, to (ii) fixed charges, as defined in the credit agreement. The financial covenant is triggered only if the Company fails to maintain minimum levels of availability under the facility. If triggered, the Company must maintain a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.00 to 1.
On March 3, 2016, the Company redeemed its former 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Prior 2020 Notes”) and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Prior 2022 Notes”) for $625.5 million usedand $330.5 million, or 104.250% and 110.167% expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, respectively.
The redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $31.5 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $24.6 million related to reduce outstanding debt.redemption premium and $6.9 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously monetized derivative assets related to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps were treated as an increase to the debt balance of the Prior 2020 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the Spin-Off,redemption, the remaining monetization balance of $11.8 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as a reduction to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
The redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $34.6 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $31.2 million related to redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously, derivative liabilities related to termination of fixed-to-float swaps were treated as a decrease to the debt balance of the Prior 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
Outstanding balances under the Company's Prior 2020 and Prior 2022 Notes, as well as the Prior Senior Credit Facility, were repaid with proceeds from the 2021 Notes and a cash dividend from MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments, inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and 2021 Notes. 
8. Accounts Receivable Securitization
The Company maintains an accounts receivable securitization program with a commitment size of $75.0 million, whereby transactions under the program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” 


On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement (“RPA”) among Manitowoc Funding, LLC (“MTW Funding”), as Seller, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., as Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Purchaser and as Agent, to replace its prior facility.
Under the RPA (and related Purchase and Sale Agreements), the Company’s domestic trade accounts receivable are sold to MTW Funding which, in turn, sells, conveys, transfers and assigns to a third-party financial institution (“Purchaser”), all of MTW Funding's rights, title and interest in a pool of receivables to the Purchaser.
The Purchaser receives ownership of the pool of receivables in each instance. New receivables are purchased by MTW Funding and sold to the Purchaser as cash collections reduce previously sold investments. The Company acts as the servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) of the receivables and, as such, administers, collects and otherwise enforces the receivables. The Servicer is compensated for doing so on terms that are generally consistent with what would be charged by an unrelated servicer. The Servicer initially receives payments made by obligors on the receivables but is required to remit those payments to the Purchaser in accordance with the RPA.The Purchaser has no recourse for uncollectible receivables.
Trade accounts receivable sold to the Purchaser totaled $160.2 million and $181.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017and 2016, respectively. Cash proceeds received from customers related to the receivables previously sold for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $133.3 million and $229.0 million, respectively.
Sales of trade receivables under the program reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were $32.7 million and $19.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  The Company deems the interest rate risk related to the deferred purchase price notes to be de minimis, primarily because the average collection cycle of the related receivables is less than 60 days; and as such, the fair value of the Company’s deferred purchase price notes approximates book value. The fair value of the deferred purchase price notes recorded as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $41.9 million and $30.6 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The securitization program contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other restrictions, these covenants require the Company to meet specified financial tests, which include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which is the same as the covenant ratio required per the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the RPA, as amended.
9.  Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded income tax expense of $2.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded income tax expense of $3.8 million and $108.4 million, respectively. The decrease in the Company’s tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 relative to the prior year relates primarily to a non-cash charge in 2016 of $106.4 million for a one-time increase in the valuation allowance associated with the Company’s domestic federal and state deferred tax assets and attributes in connection with the Spin-Off. In addition to the 2016 non-cash charge related to the valuation allowance, the Company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates.
The Company will continue to evaluate its valuation allowance requirements on an ongoing basis in light of changing facts and circumstances and may adjust its deferred tax asset valuation allowances accordingly, and it is a reasonable possibility that the Company will either add to or reverse a portion of its existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future. Such changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances will be reflected in the current operations through the Company’s income tax provision and could have a material effect on operating results.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $15.6 million as of June 30, 2017 and $15.8 million as of December 31, 2016. 
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. As of June 30, 2017, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits, resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and the results of this business are classifiedoperations and cash flows. However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from the Company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in discontinued operations.the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties and/or interest assessments.
4.10. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 140,437,702
 137,138,220
 140,260,690
 136,869,066
Effect of dilutive securities 2,180,983
 —
 —
 —
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 142,618,685
 137,138,220
 140,260,690
 136,869,066
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, 1.5 million and 4.2 million of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, 1.3 million and 4.2 million of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares.
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the total number of potentially dilutive options was zero and 1.6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the total number of potentially dilutive options was 1.9 million and 1.1 million, respectively. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, these dilutive options were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share since doing so would decrease the loss per share.
No cash dividends were paid during any of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016.
11.  Stockholders’ Equity
The following is a roll forward of retained earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
($ in millions) Retained Earnings
Balance at December 31, 2016 $247.3
Net loss (35.5)
Balance at June 30, 2017 $211.8
($ in millions) Retained Earnings
Balance at December 31, 2015 $562.3
Net loss (201.7)
Distribution of MFS 51.2
Balance at June 30, 2016 $411.8
Authorized capital consists of 300 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 3.5 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock.  None of the preferred shares have been issued.
Currently, the Company has authorization to purchase up to 2.4 million shares of common stock at management’s discretion; however, the Company has certain restrictions from repurchasing shares of its capital stock or other equity interests under various covenants of its debt agreements. Further, the Company has not purchased any shares of its common stock under this authorization since 2006.
A reconciliation for the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 is as follows:


($ in millions) Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges Pension & Postretirement Foreign Currency Translation Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 $(0.3) $(51.8) $(110.8) $(162.9)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 0.3
 —
 10.1
 10.4
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 0.2
 0.6
 —
 0.8
Net current period other comprehensive income 0.5
 0.6
 10.1
 11.2
Balance at March 31, 2017 0.2
 (51.2) (100.7) (151.7)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications —
 —
 23.1
 23.1
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 0.1
 0.5
 —
 0.6
Net current period other comprehensive income 0.1
 0.5
 23.1
 23.7
Balance at June 30, 2017 $0.3
 $(50.7) $(77.6) $(128.0)
($ in millions) Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges Pension & Postretirement Foreign Currency Translation Total
Balance at December 31, 2015 $(3.8) $(82.6) $(121.4) $(207.8)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (2.7) —
 20.3
 17.6
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 4.3
 1.2
 —
 5.5
Net current period other comprehensive income 1.6
 1.2
 20.3
 23.1
Distribution of MFS 2.1
 44.5
 31.0
 77.6
Balance at March 31, 2016 (0.1) (36.9) (70.1) (107.1)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications —
 —
 (17.4) (17.4)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (0.1) 1.2
 —
 1.1
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) (0.1) 1.2
 (17.4) (16.3)
Balance at June 30, 2016 $(0.2) $(35.7) $(87.5) $(123.4)


The following is a reconciliation of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2017
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017  
($ in millions) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Recognized Location
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges      
  Foreign exchange contracts $(0.1) $(0.3) Cost of sales
  (0.1) (0.3) Total before tax
  —
 —
 Tax expense
  $(0.1) $(0.3) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement items      
  Actuarial losses $(1.3) $(2.6)(a) 
  Prior service cost 0.4
 0.7
  
  (0.9) (1.9) Total before tax
  0.4
 0.8
 Tax expense
  $(0.5) $(1.1) Net of tax
       
Total reclassifications for the period $(0.6) $(1.4) Net of tax
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 16, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).
The following is a reconciliation of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
  
($ in millions) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Recognized Location
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges      
  Commodity contracts $0.1
 $(1.0) Cost of sales
  Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed —
 (4.3) Interest Expense
  0.1
 (5.3) Total before tax
  —
 1.1
 Tax expense
  $0.1
 $(4.2) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement items      
  Actuarial losses $(1.2) $(2.4)  
  (1.2) (2.4) Total before tax
  —
 —
 Tax expense
  $(1.2) $(2.4) Net of Tax
       
Total reclassifications for the period $(1.1) $(6.6) Net of Tax
       
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 16, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).



12.  Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) was approved by shareholders on May 7, 2013 and replaced several of the Company's incentive plans (collectively referred to as the “Prior Plans”). No new awards may be granted under the Prior Plans; however, outstanding awards under the Prior Plans will continue in force and effect pursuant to their terms. The 2013 Plan provides for both short-term and long-term incentive awards for employees and non-employee directors. Stock-based awards may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance shares or performance unit awards. The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock originally available for awards under the 2013 Plan was 8.0 million shares, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and certain other transactions or events. On March 20, 2016, in accordance with the 2013 Plan's adjustment provisions, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2013 Plan to reflect the effect of the Spin-Off, as a result, the number of shares of common stock reserved for future awards under the 2013 Plan was increased by 22.1 million shares.
Stock-based compensation expense was $1.1 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense was $3.3 million and $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the awards' vesting period.
The Company did not grant any options to acquire shares of common stock to employees during the three months ended June 30, 2017. The Company granted options to acquire 0.1 million shares of common stock to employees during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Options to acquire 1.1 million and 1.7 million shares of common stock were granted to employees during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The options granted in 2017 become exercisable in three annual increments over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire 10 years subsequent to the grant date, and the options granted in 2016 and prior years become exercisable in four annual increments over a four-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and also expire 10 years subsequent to the grant date. 
The Company issued a negligible number of RSUs to employees during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 0.1 million RSUs during the three months ended June 30, 2016. A total of 0.5 million and 0.6 million RSUs were issued by the Company to employees and directors during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The RSUs granted to employees generally vest on the first or third anniversary of the grant date, depending on the grant. The RSUs granted to directors vest on the second anniversary of the grant date.
The Company did not issue any performance shares to employees during the three months ended June 30, 2017, and a negligible number of performance shares were issued during the three months ended June 30, 2016. A total of 0.5 million and 0.8 million performance shares were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Performance shares are earned based on the extent to which performance goals are met over the applicable performance period.  The performance goals and the applicable performance period vary for each grant year. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2017 are based on 50% on total shareholder return ("TSR") relative to peers during the three-year performance period and 50% on Adjusted EBITDA percentage from continuing operations in 2019. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2016 are based 50% on TSR relative to peers and 50% on the weighted average return on invested capital (ROIC) over the three-year performance period. Depending on the foregoing factors, the number of shares earned could range from zero to 0.9 million and zero to 1.2 million for the 2017 and 2016 performance share grants, respectively.
13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 by level within the fair value hierarchy.  Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 Fair Value as of June 30, 2017
($ in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Current Assets: 
  
  
  
Foreign currency exchange contracts$—
 $0.3
 $—
 $0.3
Commodity contracts—
 0.2
 —
 0.2
Total current assets at fair value$—
 $0.5
 $—
 $0.5
        
Current Liabilities: 
  
  
  
Commodity contracts$—
 $0.1
 $—
 $0.1
Total current liabilities at fair value$—
 $0.1
 $—
 $0.1


Fair Value as of September 30, 2016Fair Value as of December 31, 2016
(in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
($ in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Current Assets: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Foreign currency exchange contracts$—
 $0.2
 $—
 $0.2
$—
 $0.2
 $—
 $0.2
Commodity contracts—
 0.2
 —
 0.2
Total current assets at fair value$—
 $0.2
 $—
 $0.2
$—
 $0.4
 $—
 $0.4
       
Current Liabilities: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Foreign currency exchange contracts$—
 $5.8
 $—
 $5.8
$—
 $1.0
 $—
 $1.0
Commodity contracts—
 0.2
 —
 0.2
Total current liabilities at fair value$—
 $6.0
 $—
 $6.0
$—
 $1.0
 $—
 $1.0
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
(in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Current Assets: 
  
  
  
Foreign currency exchange contracts$—
 $0.3
 $—
 $0.3
Total current assets at fair value$—
 $0.3
 $—
 $0.3
Current Liabilities: 
  
  
  
Foreign currency exchange contracts$—
 $1.1
 $—
 $1.1
Commodity contracts—
 0.7
 —
 0.7
   Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed
—
 1.7
 —
 1.7
Total current liabilities at fair value$—
 $3.5
 $—
 $3.5
Non-current Liabilities:       
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed$—
 $0.6
 $—
 $0.6
Foreign currency exchange contracts—
 0.1
 —
 0.1
Total non-current liabilities at fair value$—
 $0.7
 $—
 $0.7
The fair value of the Company's 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien2021 Notes due 2021 was $280.8approximately $289.6 million and $282.2 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016. The fair value of the Company’s 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 was $623.1 million as of 2017 and December 31, 2015 and the fair value of the Company’s 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 was $310.6 million as of December 31, 2015; these Senior Notes were redeemed on March 3, 2016. The fair values of the Company’s previously outstanding Term Loans under its Prior Senior Credit Facility, which was replaced by the ABL Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 10, “Debt”) on March 3, 2016, were as follows as of December 31, 2015: Term Loan A - $307.7 million and Term Loan B - $116.7 million. The Term Loans were repaid in conjunction with the Spin-Off.respectively. See Note 10,7, “Debt,” for a description of the debt instruments and their related carrying values.
ASC Topic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurement,” defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820-10 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
  
Level 2Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or
  
 Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
  
 Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
  
Level 3Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Company estimates the fair value of its Senior Notes and estimated the fair value of its previously outstanding Term Loans based on


quoted market prices of the instruments;prices; because these markets are typically thinly traded, the assets andand/or liabilities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, deferred purchase price notes on receivables sold (see Note 11,8, “Accounts Receivable Securitization”) and short-term variable debt, including any amounts outstanding under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility, approximate fair value, without being discounted as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
As a result of its global operating and financing activities, the Company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices, which may adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizesattempts to minimize these risks through the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes, and the Company does not use leveraged derivative financial instruments. The foreign currency exchange, commodity and interest rate contracts are valued through an independent valuation source that uses an industry standard data provider, with resulting valuations periodically validated through third-party or counterparty quotes. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2.


14.  Contingencies and Significant Estimates
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
UseAs of derivative instruments is consistent withJune 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the overallCompany had reserved $29.6 million and $28.6 million, respectively, for warranty claims included in product warranties, as well as other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the normal course of business, the Company provides its customers a warranty covering workmanship, and risk management objectives ofin some cases materials, on products manufactured by the Company. Derivative instruments maySuch warranty generally provides that products will be usedfree from defects for periods ranging from 12 to manage business risk within limits specified by the Company’s risk policy and60 months. If a product fails to manage exposures that have been identified through the risk identification and measurement process, provided that they clearly qualify as “hedging” activities as defined in the risk policy.  Use of derivative instruments is not automatic, nor is it necessarily the only response to managing pertinent business risk.  Use is permitted only after the risks that have been identified are determined to exceed defined tolerance levels and are considered to be unavoidable. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes.
The primary risks managed by the Company by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency exchange risk.  Interest rate swaps are used to manage interest rate or fair value risk.  Swap contracts on various commodities are used to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in the Company’s manufacturing processes.  The Company also enters into various foreign currency derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk associatedcomply with the Company’s projected foreign currency denominated purchases, sales, and receivable and payable balances.
ASC Topic 815-10, “Derivatives and Hedging,” requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position.  In accordance with ASC Topic 815-10,warranty, the Company designates commodity swaps, foreign currency exchange contracts,may be obligated, at its expense, to correct any defect by repairing or replacing such defective products. The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its warranty at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include labor and float-to-fixed interest rate derivative contractsmaterials, as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of commodities and purchases and sales currencies, and of variable rate interest payments.  Also in accordancenecessary, associated with ASC Topic 815-10,repair or replacement. The primary factors that affect the Company designates fixed-to-float interest rate swaps as fair market value hedges of fixed rate debt, which synthetically swap the Company’s fixed rate debt to floating rate debt.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.  Gains and losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.  In the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $0.3 million of unrealized losses net of tax related to commodity price and currency exchange rate hedging will be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings.  Foreign currency and commodity hedging is generally completed prospectively on a rolling basis for between twelve and twenty-four months, respectively, depending on the type of risk being hedged.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding commodity and foreign currency exchange contracts that were intended to hedge forecasted transactions:
Designated Hedging Instruments Units Hedged    
Commodity September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Unit Type
Natural Gas 62,875
 175,617
 MMBtu Cash Flow
Steel 4,585
 4,811
 Tons Cash Flow
Designated Hedging Instruments Units Hedged  
Short Currency September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Type
Australian Dollar 3,598,634
 —
 Cash Flow
European Euro 21,875,317
 —
 Cash Flow
South Korean Won 496,671,700
 1,533,257,930
 Cash Flow
Singapore Dollar 1,800,000
 1,800,000
 Cash Flow
British Pound 191,411
 —
 Cash Flow
Japanese Yen 133,928,500
 245,915,700
 Cash Flow
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $175.0 million notional amount of float-to-fixed interest rate swaps outstanding related to Term Loan A under the Prior Senior Credit Facility that were designated as cash flow hedges. As a result, $175.0 million of Term Loan A was hedged at an interest rate of 1.635%, plus the applicable spread based on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio of the Company as defined under the Prior Senior Credit Facility at December 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no outstanding fixed-to-float interest rate swaps related to the Senior Notes.


See Note 10, “Debt,”warranty liability include the number of units shipped and historical and anticipated warranty claims. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Below is a table summarizing the warranty activity for a description of the debt instruments.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815-10,six months ended June 30, 2017 and the gains or losses on the derivatives are recognized in current earnings within Other income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  As of September 30, 2016 and year ended December 31, 20152016:, the Company had the following outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts that were not designated as hedging instruments:
Non Designated Hedging Instruments Units Hedged     
Short Currency September 30,
2016		 December 31, 2015  Recognized Location Purpose
European Euro —
 20,490,320
  Other income, net Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement
United States Dollar 170,000
 17,321,106
  Other income, net Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement
Japanese Yen —
 70,518,463
  Other income, net Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement
British Pound 27,284
 4,840,238
  Other income, net Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement
Singapore Dollar 800,000
 500,000
  Other income, net Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement
($ in millions) Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Balance at beginning of period $28.6
 $32.4
Accruals for warranties issued during the period 16.3
 20.4
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period (16.4) (23.7)
Currency translation 1.1
 (0.5)
Balance at end of period $29.6
 $28.6
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments and recorded as assetsProduct liability reserves in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows:
Designated Hedging Instruments   ASSET DERIVATIVES
    September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments    
  
Foreign exchange contracts Other current assets $0.2
 $0.3
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments   $0.2
 $0.3
Total asset derivatives   $0.2
 $0.3
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows:
    LIABILITY DERIVATIVES
    September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments    
  
Foreign exchange contracts Accounts payable and accrued expenses $0.4
 $0.2
Commodity contracts Accounts payable and accrued expenses 0.2
 0.7
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed Accounts payable and accrued expenses —
 1.7
Foreign exchange contracts Other non-current liabilities —
 0.1
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed Other non-current liabilities —
 0.6
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments   $0.6
 $3.3


    LIABILITY DERIVATIVES
    September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments    
  
Foreign exchange contracts Accounts payable and accrued expenses $5.4
 $0.9
Total derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments   $5.4
 $0.9
       
Total liability derivatives   $6.0
 $4.2




6. Inventories
The components of inventories as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized as follows:
(in millions) September 30,
2016		 December 31,
2015
Inventories:  
  
Raw materials $125.3
 $155.3
Work-in-process 134.3
 116.3
Finished goods 312.7
 251.7
Total inventories 572.3
 523.3
Excess and obsolete inventory reserve (43.2) (34.1)
Net inventories at FIFO cost 529.1
 489.2
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO value (32.8) (36.6)
Inventories — net $496.3
 $452.6
7. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable balances as of September 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015, consisted primarily of amounts due to the Company's captive finance company in China. As of September 30, 2016 the Company had current and long-term notes receivable in the amount of $60.4were $22.3 million and $35.1$21.7 million, respectively. Asrespectively, and were estimated using a combination of December 31, 2015, the Company had currentactual case reserves and long-term notes receivable in the amount of $65.1 million and $56.7 million, respectively. Long-term notes receivable are included within other long-term assetsactuarial methods. Based on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
8. GoodwillCompany’s experience in defending product liability claims, management believes the current reserves are adequate for estimated case resolutions on aggregate self-insured claims and Other Intangible Assets
The changes ininsured claims. Any recoveries from insurance carriers are dependent upon the carrying amountlegal sufficiency of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are as follows:
(in millions) Total
Balance as of December 31, 2015 $306.5
Foreign currency impact 3.3
Balance as of September 30, 2016 $309.8
The Company accounts for goodwillclaims and other intangible assets under the guidancesolvency of ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” for its single reporting unit, cranes.
The Company performs an annual impairment review at June 30 of every year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company performs impairment reviews using a fair-value method based on the present value of future cash flows, which involves management’s judgments and assumptions about the amounts of those cash flows and the discount rates used. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including recorded goodwill. Goodwill is then subject to risk of write-down to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.insurance carriers.
As of June 30, 2016,2017, various product-related lawsuits were pending. To the extent permitted under applicable law, all of these are insured with self-insurance retention levels and/or coverage with outside insurers. The Company’s self-insurance retention levels vary by business and have fluctuated over the last 10 years. As of June 30, 2017, the largest self-insured retention level for new occurrences currently maintained by the Company performed its annual impairment analysis relativeis $2.0 million per occurrence and applies to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and based on those results, no impairment was indicated.product liability claims for cranes manufactured in the United States.
The cranes business provides engineered lifting products that are used in a wide varietyAs of applications, including energy and utilities, petrochemical and industrial projects, infrastructure development such as road, bridge and airport construction, and commercial and high-rise residential construction. The decline in oil prices and resulting slowdown in upstream oil & gas activity, as well as uncertainty in global macroeconomic factorsJune 30, 2017, the Company held reserves for environmental matters related to infrastructurepotential contaminants in soil and construction, has causedgroundwater. The ultimate cost of any remediation required will depend upon the Company's customers to defer or reduce capital spending.
A considerable amountresults of management judgment and assumptions are required in performing the impairment test, principally in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. Whilefuture investigation. Based upon available information, the Company believesdoes not expect the judgments and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair value and, therefore, impairment charges could be required. Weakening industry or economic trends, disruptions to our business, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in the useultimate costs at any of the assets or in entity structure may adversely impact the assumptions used in the valuations. The Company continually monitors market conditions and determines if any additional interim reviews of goodwill, other intangibles or long-lived assets are


warranted. In the event the Company determines that assets are impaired in the future, the Company would recognize a non-cash impairment charge, which couldthese locations will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Results of Operations.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value of the Company’s intangible assets other than goodwill at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:
  September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
Trademarks and tradenames $95.8
 $—
 $95.8
 $94.2
 $—
 $94.2
Customer relationships 10.4
 (7.7) 2.7
 10.4
 (7.1) 3.3
Patents 29.6
 (28.1) 1.5
 29.1
 (26.6) 2.5
Engineering drawings 10.3
 (10.1) 0.2
 10.2
 (9.3) 0.9
Distribution network 18.7
 —
 18.7
 18.4
 —
 18.4
Other intangibles 0.3
 (0.3) —
 0.3
 (0.3) —
Total $165.1
 $(46.2) $118.9
 $162.6
 $(43.3) $119.3
Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
9. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized as follows:
(in millions) September 30,
2016		 December 31,
2015
Trade accounts payable $184.3
 $268.5
Employee related expenses 30.2
 35.0
Accrued vacation 23.4
 25.1
Miscellaneous accrued expenses 112.4
 107.7
Total $350.3
 $436.3


10. Debt
Outstanding debt at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is summarized as follows:
(in millions) September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Revolving credit facility $20.0
 $—
Term loan A —
 312.8
Term loan B —
 119.5
Senior notes due 2020 —
 613.1
Senior notes due 2022 —
 299.2
Senior secured second lien notes due 2021 249.2
 —
Other 43.3
 66.3
Deferred financing costs (4.2) (13.3)
Total debt 308.3
 1,397.6
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt (15.3) (67.2)
Long-term debt $293.0
 $1,330.4
On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a $225.0 million Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (as amended, the "ABL Revolving Credit Facility") by and among the Company and certain of its domestic and German subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Joint Lead Arrangers. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes a $75.0 million Letter of Credit Facility, $10.0 million of which is available to the German borrower, with a term of 5 years.
Loans made under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and are secured by certain inventories and fixed assets of the Company and the guarantors and are guaranteed by the material direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility contains a Fixed Charge Coverage springing financial covenant, which measures the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other adjustments (Adjusted EBITDA), as defined in the credit agreement, to (ii) fixed charges, as defined in the related credit agreement. The financial covenant is triggered only if the Company fails to maintain minimum levels of availability under the credit facility. If triggered, the Company must maintain a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.00 to 1.00.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties, events of default and customary covenants, including without limitation: limitations on indebtedness, capital expenditures, restricted payments, disposals, investments, and acquisitions.
In October 2016, the ABL Revolving Credit Facility was amended to accommodate certain previously restricted activities related to the relocation of its manufacturing operations from Manitowoc, WI to Shady Grove, PA as announced during the third quarter of 2016. Among other things, the amendment will allow the Company to transfer, sell, and/or impair fixed assets located at the Manitowoc, WI facility with limited impact on the availability under the facility.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility replaced the $1,050.0 million Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Prior Senior Credit Facility”), which the Company entered into on January 3, 2014. The Prior Senior Credit Facility included three different loan facilities. The first was a revolving facility with a five year term in the amount of $500.0 million. The second facility was Term Loan A in the aggregate amount of $350.0 million, with a term of five years. The third facility was Term Loan B in the aggregate amount of $200.0 million, with a term of seven years.
The termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility resulted in a loss of $5.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing expenses.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $175.0 million notional amount of float-to-fixed interest rate swaps outstanding related to Term Loan A under the Prior Senior Credit Facility that were designated as cash flow hedges. As a result, $175.0 million of Term Loan A was hedged at an interest rate of 1.635%, plus the applicable spread based on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio of the Company as defined under the Prior Senior Credit Facility. Interest rate swaps were terminated concurrent with the Spin-Off resulting in a loss of $4.3 million.


On February 18, 2016, the Company entered into an indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trust and collateral agent, and completed the sale of $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due August 15, 2021 (the "2021 Notes"). Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. The 2021 Notes were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.
The 2021 Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Company's 100% owned domestic subsidiaries. These subsidiaries also guarantee the Company's obligations under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility together with certain of the Company's German subsidiaries. The 2021 Notes contain affirmative and negative covenants that limit, among other things, the Company's ability to redeem or repurchase its debt, incur additional debt, make acquisitions, merge with other entities, pay dividends or distributions, repurchase capital stock, and create or become subject to liens and include customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing with respect to the 2021 Notes, then the trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the outstanding 2021 Notes may declare the principal and accrued interest to be due and payable immediately. In addition, in the case of an event of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy, all unpaid principal of, unamortized discount, and accrued and unpaid interest on all outstanding 2021 Notes will become due and payable immediately.
The 2021 Notes are redeemable, at the Company’s option, in whole or in part from time to time, at any time prior to February 15, 2019, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued but unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, the Company may redeem the 2021 Notes in whole or in part for a premium at any time on or after February 15, 2019. The following would be the principal and premium paid by the Company, expressed as percentages of the principal amount thereof, if it redeems the 2021 Notes during the periods as set forth below:
Start Date (on or after)End Date (prior to)Percentage
2/15/20192/15/2020106.375%
2/15/20208/15/2020103.188%
8/15/20208/15/2021100.000%
In addition, at any time prior to February 15, 2019, the Company is permitted to, at its option, use the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the 2021 Notes at a redemption price of 112.75%, plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption; provided that (1) at least 65.0% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes outstanding remains outstanding immediately after any such redemption; and (2) the Company makes such redemptions not more than 90 days after the consummation of any such public offering. Further, the Company is required to offer to repurchase the 2021 Notes for cash at a price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event.
On March 3, 2016, the Company redeemed its previously outstanding 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Prior 2020 Notes”) and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Prior 2022 Notes” and, together with the 2021 Notes and Prior 2020 Notes, the "Senior Notes") for $625.5 million and $330.5 million, or 104.250% and 110.167% as expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, respectively.
The redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $31.5 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $24.6 million related to the redemption premium and $6.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously monetized derivative assets related to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps were treated as an increase to the debt balance of the Prior 2020 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining monetization balance of $11.8 million as of March 3, 2016, was amortized as a reduction to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
The redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $34.6 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $31.2 million related to the redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously, derivative liabilities related to termination of fixed-to-float swaps were treated as a decrease to the debt balance of the Prior 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
Outstanding balances under the Company's Prior Senior Credit Facility and Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes were repaid with proceeds from the 2021 Notes and a cash dividend from MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding $43.3 million of other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.41%.  This debt includes outstanding line of credit balances and capital lease obligations.


As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $20.0 million of borrowings outstanding on the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the highest daily borrowing was $29.5 million and the average borrowing was $8.1 million, while the average annual interest rate was 2.89%. The interest rate of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility fluctuates based on excess availability.  As of September 30, 2016, the spreads for LIBOR and Prime borrowings were 1.50% and 0.50%, respectively, with excess availability of approximately $145.6 million, which represents revolver borrowing capacity of $182.3 million less current non pre-payable borrowings of $20.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $16.7 million. We also had on-hand $16.0 million in money market funds as of September 30, 2016, which results in net availability under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility of $161.6 million.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had no interest rate swaps outstanding related to the 2021 Notes.
The balance sheet values of the Senior Notes as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are not equal to the face value of the Senior Notes because of original issue discounts and gains (losses) of previously terminated fixed-to-float interest rate hedges (see Note 5, "Derivative Financial Instruments" for more information), respectively, which are included in the applicable balance sheet values.
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASC No. 2015-03 and has classified its net deferred financing costs related to its 2021 Notes as a direct deduction from long-term debt versus as a deferred asset. Net deferred financing costs associated with the Company's ABL Revolving Credit Facility are classified as a deferred asset and are included with other long-term assets.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments, inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and the 2021 Notes.  Based upon the Company's current plans and outlook, management believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
11. Accounts Receivable Securitization
The Company maintains an accounts receivable securitization program with a commitment size of $75.0 million, whereby transactions under the program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”  Sales of trade receivables under the program are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  The Company deems the interest rate risk related to the deferred purchase price notes to be de minimis, primarily due to the short average collection cycle of the related receivables (i.e., less than 60 days) as noted below.
On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement ("RPA") among Manitowoc Funding, LLC ("MTW Funding"), as Seller, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., as Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Purchaser and as Agent. The RPA replaced the Fifth Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated December 15, 2014.
Under the RPA (and the related Purchase and Sale Agreements referenced in the RPA), the Company’s domestic trade accounts receivable are sold to MTW Funding which, in turn, sells, conveys, transfers and assigns to a third-party financial institution (“Purchaser”), all of MTW Funding's rights, title and interest in to a pool of receivables to the Purchaser.
The Purchaser receives ownership of the pool of receivables, in each instance. New receivables are purchased by MTW Funding and resold to the Purchaser as cash collections and reduce previously sold investments. The Company acts as the servicer (in such capacity, the "Servicer") of the receivables and, as, such administers, collects and otherwise enforces the receivables. The Servicer is compensated for doing so on terms that are generally consistent with what would be charged by an unrelated servicer. The Servicer initially receives payments made by obligors on the receivables but is required to remit those payments to the Purchaser in accordance with the RPA. The Purchaser has no recourse for uncollectible receivables.
Trade accounts receivables sold to the Purchaser and being serviced by the Company totaled $36.5 million and $64.2 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. 
Due to an average collection cycle of less than 60 days for such accounts receivable, as well as, the Company’s collection history, the fair value of the Company’s deferred purchase price notes approximates book value.  The fair value of the deferred purchase price notes recorded as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $20.4 million and $54.1 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The securitization program also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other restrictions, these covenants require the Company to meet specified financial tests, which include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which is the same as the covenant ratio required per the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2016, the Company was


in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the RPA, as amended. Based on management’s current plans and outlook, it believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
12.  Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded income tax benefit of $5.3 million compared to an income tax benefit of $6.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded income tax expense of $116.9 million compared to an income tax benefit of $17.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in the Company’s tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 relative to the prior year relates primarily to a non-cash charge of $113.1 million in relation to the valuation allowance associated with the Company’s domestic federal and state deferred tax assets and attributes in connection with the Spin-Off. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company filed its 2015 federal income tax return, which was the primary driver of the $7.1 million reduction to the previously recorded valuation allowance. In addition to the non-cash charge related to the valuation allowance, the Company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates.
The Company has reserved all of its domestic net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2016, with a valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, "Income Taxes," which requires an estimation of the recoverability of the recorded income tax asset balances. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had recorded $120.2 million of valuation allowances attributable to its domestic net deferred tax assets. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company filed its 2015 federal income tax return, which was the primary driver of the $7.1 million reduction to the previously recorded valuation allowance. The determination of recording and releasing valuation allowances against deferred tax assets is made, in part, pursuant to the Company’s assessment as to whether it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income against which benefits of the deferred tax assets may or may not be realized.
The Company will continue to periodically evaluate its valuation allowance requirements in light of changing facts and circumstances, and may adjust its deferred tax asset valuation allowances accordingly. It is reasonably possible that the Company will either add to, or reverse a portion of its existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future. Such changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances will be reflected in the current operations through the Company’s income tax provision, and could have a material effect on operating results.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $17.6 million as of September 30, 2016, and $19.4 million as of December 31, 2015. 
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves.  As of September 30, 2016, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and thecondition, results of operations and cash flows.  However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the Company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows individually or in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.


13. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding138,422,953
 136,164,053
 137,390,809
 135,983,603
Effect of dilutive securities—
 —
 —
 —
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding138,422,953
 136,164,053
 137,390,809
 135,983,603
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, 1.0 million and 3.4 million, respectively, of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively, 1.0 million and 2.9 million of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares.
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the total number of potentially dilutive options was 4.1 million and 1.2 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the total number of potentially dilutive options was 3.2 million and 1.3 million, respectively. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations for the quarter, these dilutive options were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share since doing so would decrease the loss per share.
No cash dividends were paid during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015.
14.  Stockholders’ Equity
The following is a roll forward of retained earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:
(in millions) Retained Earnings
Balance at December 31, 2015 $539.5
Net loss (352.4)
Distribution of MFS 51.2
Balance at September 30, 2016 $238.3
(in millions) Retained Earnings
Balance at December 31, 2014 $486.9
Net income 19.7
Balance at September 30, 2015 $506.6
Authorized capitalization consists of 300 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 3.5 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock.  None of the preferred shares have been issued.
Currently, the Company has authorization to purchase up to 2.4 million shares of common stock at management’s discretion; however, the Company has not purchased any shares of its common stock under this authorization since 2006.


(in millions) Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges Pension & Postretirement Foreign Currency Translation Total
Balance at December 31, 2015 $(3.8) $(82.6) $(121.4) $(207.8)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (2.7) —
 49.2
 46.5
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 4.3
 1.2
 —
 5.5
Net current period other comprehensive income 1.6
 1.2
 49.2
 52.0
Distribution of MFS 2.1
 44.5
 2.1
 48.7
Balance at March 31, 2016 (0.1) (36.9) (70.1) (107.1)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications —
 —
 (17.4) (17.4)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (0.1) 1.2
 —
 1.1
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income (0.1) 1.2
 (17.4) (16.3)
Balance at June 30, 2016 (0.2) (35.7) (87.5) (123.4)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications —
 —
 5.7
 5.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 0.2
 1.1
 —
 1.3
Net current period other comprehensive income 0.2
 1.1
 5.7
 7.0
Balance at September 30, 2016 $—
 $(34.6) $(81.8) $(116.4)
(in millions) Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges Pension & Postretirement Foreign Currency Translation Total
Balance at December 31, 2014 $(6.3) $(95.0) $(29.2) $(130.5)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (6.9) —
 (62.8) (69.7)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 2.8
 1.4
 —
 4.2
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income (4.1) 1.4
 (62.8) (65.5)
Balance at March 31, 2015 (10.4) (93.6) (92.0) (196.0)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 1.0
 —
 8.6
 9.6
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 3.3
 1.4
 —
 4.7
Net current period other comprehensive income 4.3
 1.4
 8.6
 14.3
Balance at June 30, 2015 (6.1) (92.2) (83.4) (181.7)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (3.2) —
 (18.5) (21.7)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 2.9
 1.4
 —
 4.3
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income (0.3) 1.4
 (18.5) (17.4)
Balance at September 30, 2015 $(6.4) $(90.8) $(101.9) $(199.1)


The following is a reconciliation of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016:
  
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016
  
(in millions) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Recognized Location
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges      
  Commodity contracts $(0.2) $(1.2) Cost of sales
  Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed —
 (4.3) Interest expense
  (0.2) (5.5) Total before tax
  —
 1.1
 Tax benefit
  $(0.2) $(4.4) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement items      
  Actuarial losses $(1.1) $(3.5)(a) 
  (1.1) (3.5) Total before tax
  —
 —
 Tax benefit
  $(1.1) $(3.5) Net of tax
       
Total reclassifications for the period $(1.3) $(7.9) Net of tax
       
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 17, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).
The following is a reconciliation of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:
  
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2015
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015  
(in millions) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Recognized Location
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges      
  Foreign exchange contracts $(2.9) $(10.0) Cost of sales
  Commodity contracts (1.1) (2.5) Cost of sales
  Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed (0.6)��(1.9) Interest Expense
  (4.6) (14.4) Total before tax
  1.7
 5.4
 Tax benefit
  $(2.9) $(9.0) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement items      
  Actuarial losses $(1.9) $(5.8)(a) 
  (1.9) (5.8) Total before tax
  0.5
 1.5
 Tax benefit
  $(1.4) $(4.3) Net of Tax
       
Total reclassifications for the period $(4.3) $(13.3) Net of Tax
       
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 17, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).



15.  Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Omnibus Plan”) was approved by shareholders on May 7, 2013 and replaced several of the Company's incentive plans (collectively referred to as the "Prior Plans"). No new awards may be granted under the Prior Plans; however, outstanding awards under the Prior Plans will continue in force and effect until vested, exercised, forfeited or expired pursuant to their terms. The 2013 Omnibus Plan provides for both short-term and long-term incentive awards for employees and non-employee directors. Stock-based awards may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares or performance unit awards. The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock originally available for awards under the 2013 Omnibus Plan was 8.0 million shares, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and certain other transactions or events. On March 20, 2016, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2013 Plan to reflect the effect of the Spin-Off in accordance with the 2013 Plan’s provisions governing such adjustments; as a result, a total of 28,184,595 shares were available for future awards under the 2013 Plan as of that date.
Performance shares are earned based on the extent to which performance goals are met over the applicable performance period.  The performance goals and the applicable performance period vary for each grant year. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2016 are based fifty percent (50%) on total shareholder return relative to peers and fifty percent (50%) on the weighted average return on invested capital (ROIC) over the three-year performance period. Shares granted in 2014 were modified as of the Spin-Off date such that payout will be at target with service through December 31, 2016. Depending on the foregoing factors, the number of shares granted could range from zero to 1.3 million and zero to 0.1 million for the 2016 and 2014 performance share grants, respectively. Due to the Spin-Off, awards with performance conditions other than service were not granted in 2015.
The Company granted options to acquire 1.8 million and 0.5 million shares of common stock to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  In addition, the Company issued a total of 1.4 million restricted stock units ("RSUs") to employees and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 0.4 million restricted stock units to employees and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  The RSUs granted to employees vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The RSUs granted to directors vest on the second anniversary of the grant date.
In April 2015, the Company issued a total of 0.4 million restricted stock awards ("RSAs") to employees as retention awards to provide additional incentive for the employees to continue in employment and contribute toward the successful completion of the Spin-Off. As of September 30, 2016, 0.3 million RSAs remain outstanding. Under the retention agreements, each employee was granted RSAs that will vest on the second anniversary of the Spin-Off if the employee has been continuously employed with MTW, MFS or an affiliate through that second anniversary.
Stock-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Stock-based compensation expense was $3.8 million and $8.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the stock-based awards' vesting period.
On March 4, 2016, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company adjusted its outstanding equity awards in accordance with the terms of an employee matters agreement. For purposes of the vesting of these equity awards, continued employment or service with MTW or with MFS is treated as continued employment for purposes of these awards. Stock options, RSUs and RSAs granted for MTW common stock prior to March 4, 2016 were generally converted into the same number of MTW stock options (with an adjusted exercise price), RSUs and RSAs, as well as, an equal number of MFS stock options, RSUs and RSAs. The underlying performance conditions for the RSUs are consistent with MTW’s original performance targets and future measurement periods. As no incremental fair value was awarded as a result of the adjustments, the modifications did not result in significant incremental compensation expense.
16.  Contingencies and Significant Estimatesaggregate.
The Company believes that it has obtained and is in substantial compliance with those material environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its various businesses. Based on the facts presently known, the Company does not expect environmental compliance costs to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
As of September 30, 2016, various product-related lawsuits were pending.  To the extent permitted under applicable law, all of these are insured with self-insurance retention levels and/or coverage with outside insurers.  The Company’s self-insurance


retention levels vary by business and have fluctuated over the last 10 years.  The high-end of the Company’s self-insurance retention level is a legacy product liability insurance program inherited in the Grove acquisition for cranes manufactured in the United States for occurrences from January 2000 through October 2002.  As of September 30, 2016, the largest self-insured retention level for new occurrences currently maintained by the Company is $2.0 million per occurrence and applies to product liability claims for cranes manufactured in the United States.
Product liability reserves in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $21.4 million and $21.9 million, respectively; which were estimated using actuarial methods.  Based on the Company’s experience in defending product liability claims, management believes the current reserves are adequate for estimated case resolutions on aggregate self-insured claims and insured claims.  Any recoveries from insurance carriers are dependent upon the legal sufficiency of claims and solvency of insurance carriers.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had reserved $46.1 million and $43.9 million, respectively, for warranty claims included in product warranties and other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Certain of these warranty and other related claims involve matters in dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation.
It is reasonably possible that the estimates for environmental remediation, product liability and warranty costs may change in the near future based upon new information that may arise or matters that are beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience.  Presently, there are no reliable methods to estimate the amount of any such potential changes.
The Company is involved in numerous lawsuits involving asbestos-related claims in which the Company is one of numerous defendants. After taking into consideration legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, the current political environment with respect to asbestos-related claims and the liabilities accrued with respect to such matters, in the opinion of management, ultimate resolution is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
The Company is also involved in various legal actions arising out of the normal course of business, which, taking into account the liabilities accrued and legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution, individually and in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
It is reasonably possible that the estimates for warranty costs, product liability, environmental remediation, asbestos-related claims and other various legal matters may change based upon new information that may arise or matters that are beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience. Presently, there are no reliable methods to estimate the amount of any such potential changes.
17.15. Guarantees
The Company periodically enters into transactions with customers that provide for residual value guarantees and buyback commitments.  These initial transactions are recorded as deferred revenue and are amortized to income on a straight-line basis over a period equal to that of the customer’s third party financing agreement.  The deferred revenue included in other current and non-current liabilities as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 was $34.2$28.6 million and $43.0$30.4 million, respectively.  The total amount of residual value guarantees and buyback commitments given by the Company and outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 was $37.5$29.1 million and $42.9$32.8 million,, respectively.  These amounts are not reduced for amounts the Company would recover from the repossession and subsequent resale of the units.  The residual value guarantees and buyback commitments expire at various times through 2018. 2021. 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company sold $4.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of additional long-term notes receivable to third party financing companies. The Company guarantees the collection of some percentage (up to 100%) of notes sold to the financing companies.  The Company has accounted for the sales of the notes as a financing of receivables.  The receivables remain on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of payments made, in other current and non-current assets, and the Company has recognized an obligation equal to the net outstanding balance of the notes in other current and non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The cash flow benefit of these transactions is reflected in financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the customers paid $12.8 million and $17.4 million, respectively, on the notes to the third party financing companies.  As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance of the notes receivable guaranteed by the Company was $15.8 million and $24.4 million, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company provides its customers a warranty covering workmanship, and in some cases materials, on products manufactured by the Company.  The warranty generally provides that products will be free from defects for periods ranging from 12 to 60 months with certain equipment having longer-term warranties.  If a product fails to comply with the Company’s warranty, the Company may be obligated, at its expense, to correct any defect by repairing or replacing such defective products.  The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its warranty at the time product revenue is recognized.  These costs primarily include labor and materials, as necessary, associated with repair or


replacement.  The primary factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units shipped and historical and anticipated warranty claims.  As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary.  Below is a table summarizing the warranty activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015:
(in millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
Balance at beginning of period $43.9
 $50.2
Accruals for warranties issued during the period 23.8
 49.8
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period (22.1) (52.7)
Currency translation 0.5
 (3.4)
Balance at end of period $46.1
 $43.9
18.16. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides certain pension, health care and death benefits forto eligible retirees and their dependents. The pensionfunding mechanism for such benefits are funded, whilevaries based on the health carecountry where the retiree resides and death benefits are not funded but are paid as incurred.receives benefits.  Eligibility for pension coverage is based on meeting certain years of service and retirement qualifications. TheseHealthcare benefits may be subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions,co-payments and other limitations. The Company has reservedreserves the right to modify these benefits.benefits unless a government agency in a certain country prohibits it from doing so.
As part of the Spin-Off, and in accordance with the employee matters agreement referred to in Note 2, "Discontinued“Discontinued Operations,"” certain combined plans were split between MTW and MFS. Accordingly, the Company transferred to MFS pension obligations associated with its active, retired and other former employees of MFS for those impacted MFS-related defined benefit pension plans. The allocation of plan assets was determined in accordance with applicable ERISA (EmployeeEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974),1974, Internal Revenue Service and other jurisdictional requirements.
The components of periodic benefit costs for three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and SeptemberJune 30, 20152016 are as follows:
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
      Postretirement     Postretirement
  U.S. Non-U.S. Health and U.S. Non-U.S. Health and
  Pension Pension Other Pension Pension Other
($ in millions) Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans
Service cost - benefits earned during the period $—
 $0.5
 $—
 $—
 $0.9
 $0.1
Interest cost of projected benefit obligations 1.4
 0.4
 0.3
 2.7
 1.0
 0.5
Expected return on plan assets (1.3) (0.3) —
 (2.5) (0.7) —
Amortization of prior service cost —
 —
 (0.4) —
 —
 (0.7)
Amortization of actuarial net loss 0.8
 0.4
 0.1
 1.6
 0.8
 0.2
Net periodic benefit costs $0.9
 $1.0
 $—
 $1.8
 $2.0
 $0.1
  Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
      Postretirement     Postretirement
  U.S. Non-U.S. Health and U.S. Non-U.S. Health and
  Pension Pension Other Pension Pension Other
(in millions) Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans
Service cost - benefits earned during the period $—
 $0.5
 $0.1
 $—
 $1.4
 $0.2
Interest cost of projected benefit obligations 1.7
 0.6
 0.4
 5.6
 2.8
 1.3
Expected return on plan assets (1.4) (0.5) —
 (4.6) (2.2) —
Amortization of actuarial net loss 0.9
 0.2
 —
 3.0
 0.9
 —
Net periodic benefit costs 1.2
 0.8
 0.5
 4.0
 2.9
 1.5
Net periodic benefit costs associated with MFS —
 —
 —
 0.4
 0.4
 0.1
Net periodic benefit costs included in continuing operations $1.2
 $0.8
 $0.5
 $3.6
 $2.5
 $1.4
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
     Postretirement     Postretirement     Postretirement     Postretirement
 U.S. Non-U.S. Health and U.S. Non-U.S. Health and U.S. Non-U.S. Health and U.S. Non-U.S. Health and
 Pension Pension Other Pension Pension Other Pension Pension Other Pension Pension Other
(in millions) Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans
($ in millions) Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans
Service cost - benefits earned during the period $—
 $0.7
 $0.1
 $—
 $2.1
 $0.3
 $—
 $0.4
 $—
 $—
 $0.9
 $0.1
Interest cost of projected benefit obligations 2.3
 2.2
 0.5
 7.0
 6.6
 1.5
 1.7
 0.6
 0.4
 3.9
 2.2
 0.9
Expected return on plan assets (2.2) (1.9) —
 (6.7) (5.7) —
 (1.4) (0.5) —
 (3.2) (1.7) —
Amortization of actuarial net loss 1.3
 0.6
 —
 3.9
 1.8
 0.1
 0.9
 0.3
 —
 2.1
 0.7
 —
Net periodic benefit costs 1.4
 1.6
 0.6
 4.2
 4.8
 1.9
 1.2
 0.8
 0.4
 2.8
 2.1
 1.0
Net periodic benefit costs associated with MFS 0.1
 0.6
 —
 0.3
 1.7
 —
 —
 —
 —
 0.4
 0.4
 0.1
Net periodic benefit costs included in continuing operations $1.3
 $1.0
 $0.6
 $3.9
 $3.1
 $1.9
 $1.2
 $0.8
 $0.4
 $2.4
 $1.7
 $0.9
19.17. Restructuring and Asset Impairments
The Company initiated restructuring plans in 2015 to focus on its cranes business and spin-off its foodservice operations. The Spin-Off was completed in the first quarter of 2016. Refer to Notes 1 and 2 for further information regarding the Spin-Off. The Company is continuing its restructuring activities to right-size the business by balancing capacity with demand. During the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, , the Company incurred $3.9$5.9 million and $17.1$8.8 million of restructuring expense, respectively. These costs related primarily to employee termination benefits associated with workforce reductions. The workforce reductions are part of ongoing manufacturingDuring the six months ended June 30, 2017 and operations rationalization programs, including the planned closure of the Company's manufacturing facility in Manitowoc, WI, which was announced during the third quarter. Related to the relocation of the Manitowoc, WI, manufacturing facility, in the third quarter2016, the Company incurred approximately $3.1$17.6 million and $13.2 million of restructuring expense, respectively. The costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 related primarily to severance. The restructuring expensethe closure of manufacturing operations in Manitowoc, WI and Passo Fundo, Brazil. Costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 related to workforce reductions in two of the Company's facilities in North America.


With regard to the closure of the facility in Manitowoc, the Company expects to incur total cash charges for severance costs and other employment-related benefits of approximately $4.2 million, capital expenditures in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, included $2.3range of $10.7 million to $11.0 million and other costs in the range of $17.0 million to $18.4 million. Since the closure of the manufacturing operations in Manitowoc, WI was announced and through the second quarter of 2017, the Company has incurred $4.2 million related to severance costs and other employment-related benefits, $10.7 million for capital expenditures and $15.9 million in other costs related to these initiatives. Non-cash charges, primarily related to fixed assets and inventory related charges, are expected to be in the range of $17.0 million to $20.0 million, of expense relatedwhich $17.0 million has been recorded to date. The Company anticipates all cash and non-cash charges to be recognized by the resignationend of the former Chief Financial Officer.2017.
The following is a roll-forward of all of the Company's restructuring activities for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 (in2017 ($ in millions):
 
Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
December 31, 2015
 
Restructuring
Expenses
 Use of Reserve 
Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
September 30, 2016
Total$6.5
 $17.1
 $13.4
 $10.2
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. the Company recorded $96.9 million in asset impairment expense. This included a $13.8 million write-down to fair value related to the fixed assets of the Manitowoc, WI manufacturing facility. Further, during the quarter, the Company, in conjunction with the decision to close the manufacturing location in Manitowoc, WI, made the decision to permanently stop any further work on implementing its SAP enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) platform, and recorded a write-off of $58.6 million related to SAP construction-in-progress and $18.6 million related to SAP and other IT assets. The remainder of the expense in the quarter was related to miscellaneous other restructuring actions.
Asset valuations are estimates and require assumptions and judgment by management. While the Company believes the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, a change in assumptions, including market conditions, could change the estimated fair value and, therefore, further impairment charges could be required.
 
Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
December 31, 2016
 
Restructuring
Expenses
 Cash Use of Reserve Non-Cash Use of Reserve 
Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
June 30, 2017
Total$8.2
 $17.6
 $16.6
 $4.7
 $4.5
20.18. Recent Accounting Changes and Pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. - 2017-09 “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” to provide clarity and reduce both diversity in practice and cost complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change to the terms and conditions of a stock-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 also provides guidance about the types of changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award that require an entity to apply modification accounting in accordance with Topic 718. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08 “Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities,” to shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date instead of the contractual life of the instrument. This new guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. Entities will be required to apply the new guidance using the modified retrospective method with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings upon the adoption date. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07 “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” This ASU amends ASC 715, Compensation – Retirement Benefits, to require employers that present a measure of operating income in their statement of income to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses (together with other employee compensation costs). The other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in nonoperating expenses. This ASU also allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be capitalized (for example, as a cost of inventory). The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets, and is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 - “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment.” This ASU simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.  ASU No. 2017-04 will be effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption was permitted for any impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company early adopted ASU No. 2017-04 effective in the first quarter of 2017.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 - “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” The amendments of this ASU address the diversity of presentation of restricted cash by requiring a statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.


In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16 - “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory,” which requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Statement- “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments."” This Updateupdate addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice and affects all entities required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 - "Revenue“Revenue from Contracts with Customers"Customers” (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This was further clarified with technical corrections issued within ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, ASU 2016-20 and ASU 2017-05. The new revenue recognition guidance was issued to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customer. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to


customer at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. A five stepfive-step model has been introduced for an entity to apply when recognizing revenue. The new guidance also includes enhanced disclosure requirements and is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted as of January 1, 2017. Entities have the option to apply the new guidance under a retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented, or a modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application within the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity. We planThe Company plans to adopt the new guidance effective January 1, 2018 and areutilizing the modified retrospective approach. Based upon review of the Company's current revenue recognition practices, the Company has not identified any terms or conditions in the process of evaluation the effect of the new guidance on our financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11 - "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update)." This ASU discusses rescission of revenue and expense recognition for freight services, rescission of presentation of shipping and handling fees billed to a customer (classify as revenue only for those entitiescontracts reviewed that record revenue based on gross amount billed to customer; classification of costs is an accounting policy decision, rescission of accounting by a customer for certain consideration received from a vendor (expense associated with a free product or service delivered at time of sale of another good or service should be classified as cost of sales) and rescission of accounting for gas-balancing arrangements. The Company is evaluating the impactwould suggest the adoption of ASC 606 will result in a different pattern of revenue recognition than that recorded under current guidance.  However, the Company will continue to evaluate this assessment as further review is performed, which includes incremental contract reviews and finalization of our documentation, which could identify changes under ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.2014-09.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 - "Compensation-Stock Compensation"“Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting."” This update is part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative, and its objective is to identify, evaluate and improve areas of GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The update involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The effective date for this ASU is for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU willdid not have a material impact on itsthe Company's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06 - "Derivatives“Derivatives and Hedging: Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments."” The amendments clarify the steps required to assess whether a call or put option meets the criteria for bifurcation as an embedded derivative. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU willdid not have a material impact on itsthe Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 - "Leases"“Leases”, which is intended to improve financial reporting on leasing transactions. This standard requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by lease terms of more than 12 months. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 - "Financial“Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities."” ASU 2016-01 amends various aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure for financial instruments. Most significantly, ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of an investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income (loss). ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 - "Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements." This update clarifies the guidance related to accounting for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability; see further discussion of ASU 2015-03 below. The guidance in ASU 2015-03 did not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early application permitted. The guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 - "Inventory“Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory."” This update changes the guidance on accounting for inventory accounted for on a first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. Under the revised


standard, an entity should measure FIFO inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. The


amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company believes the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05 - "Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement." This update provides guidance on accounting for a software license in a cloud computing arrangement. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. Further, all software licenses are within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 350-40 and will be accounted for consistent with other licenses of intangible assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 - "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." To simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs, this update requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts, rather than as a deferred asset. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. The amendments in this ASU effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The guidance is applied on a retrospective basis. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02 - "Consolidation (Topic 820)—Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis." This update amends the current consolidation guidance for both the variable interest entity (VIE) and voting interest entity (VOE) consolidation models. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01 - "Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items." This update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. ASU 2015-01 is effective for the first interim period within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationOperations
Results of Operations for the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016
On March 4, 2016, the Company completed the spin-off of its former foodservice business (“MFS”) into an independent, public company (the “Spin-Off”). As a consequence, the Company’s former MFS operations are now being presented as discontinued operations. See Note 1, “Accounting Policies,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Analysis of Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 2017 decreased20.2% 13.8% to $349.8$394.6 million from $438.2$457.7 million in the second quarter of 2016. Consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 20.9% to $700.4 million from $885.1 million for the same period in 2015. Consolidated net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased 6.6% to $1,234.9 million from $1,322.6 million for the same period in 2015.2016. The decrease in net sales for the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as compared to the same period in 2015 islast year was primarily due to ongoing softnessdriven by a high level of large crawler crane shipments in the mobile cranes market driven largely by the underperformancefist and second quarter, 2016 in the U.SAmericas whose orders had been placed in earlier years. In addition, sales in the Americas and Middle East stemming from lowerremained stable mainly due to continuing low oil prices, as well as currency pressures on U.S. produced cranes with many of the Company's competitors based in Europe and sharpJapan. Slightly offsetting these declines, sales in used equipment prices. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, tower crane sales improved as a result of improvingEurope saw year-over-year growth mainly due to continued strength in residential and non-residential commercial construction trends in Western Europe, combinedmarkets, coupled with new product introductions, have offset the softness in the mobile crane business to minimize the decline in consolidated net sales.introductions. Consolidated net sales for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 were unfavorably impacted by $1.5$4.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively, from the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies.
As of September 30, 2016, total backlog was $353.6 million, a 10.1%decrease from the June 30, 2016 backlog of $393.5 million, and a 44.6%decrease from the September 30, 2015 backlog of $638.6 million. 
Analysis of Operating Income
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $41.5 million, a decrease of $28.4 million compared to $69.9 million of consolidated gross profit for the same period in 2015. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $211.6 million, a decrease of $28.6 million compared to $240.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in gross profit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 related primarily from the decrease in net sales noted previously, which also resulted in less absorption of fixed manufacturing costs. The impact of lower sales volume was partially offset by actions taken over the last twelve months that are intended to right-size the business, including plant rationalizations, reductions in force and other operating efficiency initiatives.
For the three months ended September 30, 2016, engineering, selling and administrative (“ES&A”) expenses decreased $4.6 million to $73.0 million versus $77.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. ES&A expenses decreased 8.8% to $218.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $239.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in ES&A expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods was due primarily to reduced headcount levels, lower stock-based compensation and pension and post-retirement expense and lower discretionary spending. Other expense of $0.5 million and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 is comprised primarily of cost for separation equity awards.
The Company's subtotal operating earnings, which represents gross profit less ES&A, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were unfavorably impacted by $0.6 million and $0.1$10.7 million, respectively, from the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies.
As of June 30, 2017, total backlog was $491.2 million, a 51.7% increase from the December 31, 2016 backlog of $323.8 million, and a 24.8% increase from the June 30, 2016 backlog of $393.5 million. 
Analysis of Operating Income
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $76.3 million, a decrease of $11.0 million compared to $87.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $128.2 million, a decrease of $38.8 million compared to $167.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in gross profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year was mainly due to the decreases in sales volumes discussed above.
Engineering, selling and administrative (“ES&A”) expenses decreased 17.7% to $60.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $73.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. ES&A expenses decreased 15.2% to $123.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $145.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in ES&A expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the prior year periods was primarily due to a decrease in wages and benefits related expenses as a result of headcount reductions, reduced professional and consulting fees and discretionary cost oversight.
The Company's operating income (loss) for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was unfavorably impacted by $0.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively, from the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company is continuing its restructuring activities to right-size the business by balancing capacity with demand. This resulted in $3.9incurred $5.9 million and $17.6 million of restructuring expense, in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.4 million of income in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Within the three months ended September 30, 2016 the Company incurred approximately $3.1 million of restructuring expense for severance costsrespectively, which primarily related to the planned closure of itsmanufacturing operations in Manitowoc, WI manufacturing facility in 2017. Relatedand Passo Fundo, Brazil. With regard to the closure of the facility in Manitowoc, WI manufacturing facility, the Company expects to incur total cash charges for severance costs and other employment-related benefits of approximately $4.2 million, capital expenditures in the range of $10.7 million to $11.0 million and other costs in the range of $17.0 million to $18.4 million. From the time the closure of the manufacturing operations in Manitowoc, WI was announced and through the second quarter of 2017, the Company has incurred $4.2 million related to severance costs and other employment-related benefits, $10.7 million for capital expenditures and $15.9 million in other costs related to these initiatives. Non-cash charges, primarily related to fixed assets and inventory related charges, are expected to be in the range of $10$17.0 million to $15$20.0 million, capital expenditures inof which $17.0 million has been recorded to date. The Company anticipates all cash and non-cash charges to be recognized by the rangeend of $10 to $15 million, and other costs in2017. For the range of $15 to $20 million. In the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, the Company recognized $17.1$13.2 million of restructuring expense comparedwas incurred related to $0.4 million of expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 related primarily to employee termination benefits associated with workforce reductions in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, as well as $2.3 million related to the resignation of a former executive officer.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. the Company recorded $96.9 million in asset impairment expense. This included a $13.8 million write-down to fair value related to the fixed assetstwo of the Manitowoc, WI manufacturing facility. Further, during the quarter, the Company, in conjunction with the decision to close the manufacturing location in Manitowoc,


WI, made the decision to permanently stop any further work on implementing its SAP enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) platform , and recorded a write-off of $58.6 million related to SAP construction-in-progress and $18.6 million related to SAP and other IT assets. The remainder of the expense in the quarter was related to miscellaneous other restructuring actions.
Asset valuations, including the determination of the fair value of our reporting unit for our goodwill impairment test, are estimates and require assumptions and judgment by management. While the Company believes the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, a change in assumptions, including market conditions, could change the estimated fair value and, therefore, impairment charges could be required.Company's North American facilities.
Analysis of Non-Operating Income Statement Items
Interest expense for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was $10.0$9.7 million versus $24.0$9.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Interest expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was $29.6$19.8 million versus $71.3$19.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was due to a lower average debt balance partiallyin 2017 was significantly less than the year prior, but this was offset by a higher average interest rate. Additionally, in the remaining balancefirst quarter of $0.72016, $11.1 million as of March 3, 2016 innet derivative liabilitiesassets related to the termination of fixed-to-float swaps thatassociated with the Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes were previously treatedamortized as a net decrease to interest expense. See additional discussion of the debt balance forfixed-to-float swaps associated with the Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the lifein Note 7, “Debt,” of the original swap, was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
There was no loss on debt extinguishment for the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and 20152017 or for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The loss on debt extinguishment for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 was $76.3 million and consisted of:
$31.5of $31.5 million related to the March 3, 2016 redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes, which included $24.6 million related to the redemption premium and $6.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees;
$34.6$34.6 million on the redemption of the Prior 2022


Notes, comprised of $31.2$5.9 million related to the redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees;
$5.9 million onfor the termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility as a result of the write-off of deferred financing expenses;expense and
a $4.3 $4.3 million loss on the termination of interest rate swaps.
Amortization expense for deferred financing fees was $0.5$0.4 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to $1.1$0.4 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Amortization expense for deferred financing fees was $1.8$0.9 million of expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to $3.2$1.3 million of expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016.
Other income (expense)- net for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was $0.5$3.2 million of income compared to $2.4$2.1 million of expense for the same period in 2015 and was comprised primarily of foreign currency translation.2016. Other income (expense)- net for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was $3.7$3.0 million of income compared to $0.2$3.2 million of income for the same period in 2015 and was2016. Amounts are comprised primarily of net foreign currency translation.translation gains.
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded income tax benefit of $5.3 million, compared to an income tax benefitprovision of $6.1$2.3 million forand $0.7 million, respectively. For the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30,2017 and 2016, the Company recorded income tax expense of $116.9 million, compared to an income tax benefitprovision of $17.3$3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.and $108.4 million, respectively. The increasedecrease in the Company’s tax expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 relative to the prior year relatesrelated primarily to a one-time increasenon-cash charge in the2016 of $106.4 million as a result of a valuation allowance associated with the Company’s domestic federal and state deferred tax assets and attributes in connection with the Spin-Off. In addition to the non-cash charge related to the valuation allowance, the Company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates. However, it is also reasonably possible that sufficient positive evidence required to release all, or a portion of certain valuation allowances in our French businesses within the next 12 months may result in a reduction of the valuation allowance by up to €35.0 million. 
The Company's income (loss)loss from discontinued operations for the each of the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was $0.2 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, was a $1.8 millionthe loss compared to income of $34.4 million for the same period in 2015. The Company's income (loss) from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was a $5.8$0.8 million loss compared to income of $79.0and $4.0 million, for the same period in 2015. Activity in earnings (loss) from discontinued operations relatesrespectively, and related primarily to the results of MFS through the separation date (March 4, 2016) and separation costs associated with the Spin-Off, which are classified in discontinued operations.


Financial Condition
First NineSix Months of 20162017
Cash and cash equivalents balance as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 totaled $42.9$26.3 million, a decrease of $20.5$43.6 million from the December 31, 20152016 balance of $63.4 million, which included $31.9 million in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations.$69.9 million.
Cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations for the first ninesix months of 2017 were $44.4 million and consisted of increased inventories and accrued expenses since December 31, 2016 were $164.0 million compared to cash flows used for continuing operations of $76.8 million forcombined with reduced sales volume. This is consistent with historical seasonal working capital needs, as the first nine months of 2015.  During the first nine months of 2016 compared to the first nine months of 2015, the increasecompany builds inventory in cash flows used for continuing operations was primarily due to a cash prepayment penalty of $56.6 million related to the redemptionanticipation of the Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes. There was a decrease in accounts receivable of $38.1 million which was offset by the decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $33.4 million due to lower sales volume and related expenses. Additionally, there was a decrease in cash used for inventory of $67.2 million offset by an increase in cash used for accounts payable of $61.2 million due to lower inventory levels on decreased salessummer construction season in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, versus the comparative prior year period.northern hemisphere.
Cash flows used for investing activities of continuing operations of $32.8were $5.3 million for the first ninesix months of 20162017 and consisted of capital expenditures of $34.8$11.9 million, with the majority related to equipment purchases in North America and Europe, partially offset by proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment of $2.3 million and a change in restricted cash of $0.3$5.3 million.
Cash flows provided by financing activities of continuing operations of $242.8were $5.5 million for the first ninesix months of 20162017 and consisted primarily of net cash received as a dividend from MFS immediately prior to the Spin-Off and proceeds from the 2021 Notes. We usedrevolving credit facility of $10.3 million and $2.9 million of cash to repay our Prior Senior Credit Facilityfrom exercises of stock options, offset by net cash paid on long-term debt and the Prior 2020 Notes and 2022 Notes.receivables financing costs.
First NineSix Months of 20152016
Cash and cash equivalents balance as of SeptemberJune 30, 20152016 totaled $75.2$40.8 million, an increase of $7.2$22.6 million from the December 31, 20142015 balance of $68.0$63.4 million. The balances at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, included cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $47.3 million and $16.5 million, respectively.
Cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations for the first ninesix months of 20152016 were $76.8$178.8 million. During the first ninesix months of 2015,2016, cash flows used for continuing operations were primarily due to increased accounts receivable and inventory levels combined with reduced sales volume.
Cash flows used for investing activities of continuing operations of $22.5$23.5 million for the first ninesix months of 20152016 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $31.9$24.7 million, with the majority of the capital expenditures related to equipment purchases and ourthe since discontinued enterprise resource planning ("ERP"(“ERP”) system implementation, partially offset by proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment of $6.2 million and change in other of $3.2$0.9 million.
Cash flows provided by financing activities of continuing operations of $117.0$228.4 million for the first ninesix months of 20152016 consisted primarily of proceeds from the Company'soffering of the 2021 Notes, partially offset by cash transferred to MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off. Further, immediately prior revolving credit facility.to the Spin-Off, MFS issued long-term debt, the majority of the proceeds were provided to MTW in the form of a cash dividend which MTW used to repay the then-outstanding Prior Senior Credit Facility and 2020 Notes and 2022 Notes.



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Outstanding debt as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 is summarized as follows:
(in millions) September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Revolving credit facility $20.0
 $—
Term loan A —
 312.8
Term loan B —
 119.5
Senior notes due 2020 —
 613.1
Senior notes due 2022 —
 299.2
Senior notes due 2021 249.2
 —
Other 43.3
 66.3
Deferred financing costs (4.2) (13.3)
Total debt 308.3
 1,397.6
Less current portion and short-term borrowings (15.3) (67.2)
Long-term debt $293.0
 $1,330.4


On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a $225.0 million Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (as amended, the "ABL Revolving Credit Facility") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Joint Lead Arrangers. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes a $75.0 million Letter of Credit Facility, $10.0 million of which is available to the German borrower, with a term of 5 years.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility replaced the $1,050.0 million Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Prior Senior Credit Facility”). The termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility resulted in a loss of $5.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing expenses and $4.3 million related to termination of interest rate swaps.
On February 18, 2016, the Company entered into an indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trust and collateral agent, and completed the sale of $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due August 15, 2021 (the "2021 Notes"). Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. The 2021 Notes were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act.
On March 3, 2016, the Company redeemed its 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Prior 2020 Notes”) and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Prior 2022 Notes”) for $625.5 million and $330.5 million, or 104.250% and 110.167% as expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, respectively.
The redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $31.5 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $24.6 million related to redemption premium and $6.9 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously monetized derivative assets related to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps were treated as an increase to the debt balance of the Prior 2020 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining monetization balance of $11.8 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as a reduction to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
The redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $34.6 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $31.2 million related to redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously, derivative liabilities related to termination of fixed-to-float swaps were treated as a decrease to the debt balance of the Prior 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016.
Outstanding balances under the Company's Prior Senior Credit Facility and Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes were repaid with proceeds from the 2021 Notes and a cash dividend from MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding $43.3 million of other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.41%. This debt includes outstanding line of credit balances and capital lease obligations.
The revolving facility under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility has a maximum borrowing capacity of $225.0 million and expires in March 2021. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $20.0 million of borrowings outstanding on the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the highest daily borrowing was $29.5 million and the average borrowing was $8.1 million, while the average annual interest rate was 2.89%. The interest rate of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility fluctuates based on excess availability.  As of September 30, 2016, the spreads for LIBOR and Prime borrowings were 1.50% and 0.50%, respectively, with excess availability of approximately $145.6 million, which represents revolver borrowing capacity of $182.3 million less non pre-payable borrowings of $20.0 million and letters of credit outstanding of $16.7 million. We also had on-hand $16.0 million in money market funds as of September 30, 2016, which results in net availability under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility of $161.6 million.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had no interest rate swaps outstanding related to its 2021 Notes.
The balance sheet values of the Senior Notes as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are not equal to the face value of the Senior Notes because of gains (losses) of previously terminated fixed-to-float interest rate hedges and original issue discounts included in the applicable balance sheet values (see Note 5, "Derivative Financial Instruments," of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and the 2021 Notes.  Based upon the Company's current plans and outlook, management believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
($ in millions) June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Revolving credit facility $10.3
 $—
Senior notes due 2021 250.9
 249.8
Other 31.4
 35.7
Deferred financing costs (3.5) (4.0)
Total debt 289.1
 281.5
Less current portion and short-term borrowings (11.0) (12.4)
Long-term debt $278.1
 $269.1
See additional discussion of the credit facilities and Senior Notes in Note 9,7, “Debt,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and excluding certain adjustments provided for in its ABL Revolving Credit Facility and listed below. The Company’s trailing twelve-month Adjusted EBITDA as of September 30, 2016 was $112.3 million. The Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to the reader in order to understand the basis for the Company's debt covenant calculations. The reconciliation of net loss attributable to the Company to Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
 
Trailing Twelve
Months,
(in millions)September 30, 2016
Net loss$(308.6)
Income from discontinued operations(50.6)
Depreciation53.4
Amortization of intangibles3.0
Interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees56.7
Costs due to early extinguishment of debt76.5
Restructuring expense26.6
Income taxes91.9
Pension and post-retirement15.3
Stock-based compensation5.2
Asset impairment112.2
Other30.7
Adjusted EBITDA$112.3
The Company maintains an accounts receivable securitization program with a commitment size of $75.0 million, whereby transactions under the program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”  Sales of trade receivables under the program are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  See Note 11, “Accounts Receivable Securitization,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the program.
The Company’s liquidity position at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 is summarized as follows:
(in millions) September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents $42.9
 $31.5
 $26.3
 $69.9
Revolver borrowing capacity 182.3
 500.0
 168.9
 160.4
Less: Borrowings on revolver (20.0) —
 (10.3) —
Less: Outstanding letters of credit (16.7) (5.7) (14.4) (16.4)
Total liquidity $188.5
 $525.8
 $170.5
 $213.9
The Company believes its liquidity and expected cash flows from operations should be sufficient to meet expected working capital, capital expenditure and other general ongoing operational needs.needs in the foreseeable future.
The Company has not provided for additional U.S. income taxes on approximately $486.6$496.8 million of undistributed earnings of consolidated non-U.S. subsidiaries included in stockholders’ equity. Such earnings could become taxable upon sale or liquidation of these non-U.S. subsidiaries or upon dividend repatriation of cash balances. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the unrecognized tax liability on such earnings. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, approximately $23.5$18.7 million of the Company’s total cash and cash equivalents were held by its foreign subsidiaries. This cash is associated with earnings that the Company has asserted are permanently reinvested. The Company has no current plans to repatriate material amounts of cash or cash equivalents held by its foreign subsidiaries because it plans to reinvest such cash and cash equivalents to support its operations and continued growth plans outside the U.S. through the funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or other similar cash needs of these operations. Further, although the Company has not generated cash from operations in the current period, the Company does not currently forecast a need for these funds in the U.S. because its future U.S. operations and debt service will be supported by the cash generated by its U.S. operations.operations which are supported by the ABL Revolving Credit Facility as a source of liquidity during times of short term cash needs.  As of June 30, 2017, total availability under the facility was $150.6 million, of which $149.7 million was dedicated to U.S. borrowers.
Both the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and 2021 Notes include customary covenants and events of default. Based upon management’s current plans and outlook, the Company believes it will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
See Note 8, “Accounts Receivable Securitization,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the program. The securitization program contains customary affirmative and negative covenants.
Based on management’s current plans and outlook, the Company believes it will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
Non-GAAP Measures
The Company uses EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating income, which are non-GAAP financial measures, as additional metrics to evaluate the Company’s performance. The Company defines EBITDA as net income (loss) before loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA plus the addback of restructuring expenses, asset impairment charges and other (income) expense - net. The Company defines Adjusted operating income as Adjusted EBITDA excluding the addback of depreciation.


The Company believes these non-GAAP measures provide important supplemental information to readers regarding business trends that can be used in evaluating its results of operations because these financial measures provide a consistent method of comparing financial performance and are commonly used by investors to assess performance. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered together with, and are not substitutes for, the GAAP financial information provided herein.
The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was income of $25.2 million and $15.9 million, respectively. The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was income of $24.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was income of $25.3 million and $13.9 million, respectively. The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was income of $44.8 million and $21.2 million, respectively. The reconciliation of GAAP net income to EBITDA, further to Adjusted EBITDA and to Adjusted operating income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows ($ in millions):
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
($ in millions)June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016
Net income (loss)$0.5
 $(5.8) $(35.5) $(201.7)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes0.2
 0.8
 0.2
 4.0
Interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees10.1
 10.3
 20.7
 20.9
Provision for income taxes2.3
 0.7
 3.8
 108.4
Depreciation expense9.3
 11.4
 19.9
 23.6
Amortization of intangible assets0.3
 0.8
 0.7
 1.5
EBITDA22.7
 18.2 9.8
 (43.3)
Restructuring expense5.9
 8.8
 17.6
 13.2
Other (income) expense - net (1)(3.4) (1.7) (3.0) 74.9
Adjusted EBITDA25.2
 25.3
 24.4
 44.8
Depreciation expense(9.3) (11.4) (19.9) (23.6)
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income15.9
 13.9
 4.5
 21.2
Restructuring expense(5.9) (8.8) (17.6) (13.2)
Amortization of intangible assets(0.3) (0.8) (0.7) (1.5)
Other operating costs and expenses0.2
 (0.4) —
 (1.8)
GAAP operating income (loss)$9.9
 $3.9
 $(13.8) $4.7
(1)) Other (income) expense - net includes foreign currency translation adjustments, loss on debt extinguishment and other miscellaneous items.
The Company's EBITDA for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2017 was a loss of $124.6 million and is reconciled to net loss and Adjusted EBITDA as follows:
  Trailing Twelve Months
(in millions) June 30, 2017
Net loss $(209.6)
Loss from discontinued operations 3.4
Interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees 41.6
Provision for income taxes (4.1)
Depreciation expense 41.9
Amortization of intangible assets 2.2
EBITDA (124.6)
Restructuring expense 27.8
Asset impairment expense (1) 96.9
Other income - net (2) (2.3)
Adjusted EBITDA $(2.2)


(1) Asset impairment expense includes write-downs related to the Company's Manitowoc, WI manufacturing facility, as well as the write-off of its SAP enterprise resource planning platform in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)Other (income) expense - net includes foreign currency translation adjustments and other miscellaneous items.
Covenant compliant EBITDA as defined by the ABL Revolving Credit Facility was $48.5 million as of June 30, 2017 on a trailing twelve-month basis. The calculation of covenant compliant EBITDA has certain limitations and restrictions on addbacks and has been included for informational purposes only.
Critical Accounting Policies
OurThe Company's critical accounting policies have not materially changed since the 20152016 Form 10-K was filed. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2016 for information about the Company’s policies, methodology and assumptions related to critical accounting policies.
Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets - The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350-10, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.” Under ASC Topic 350-10, goodwill is not amortized; instead, the Company performs an annual impairment review. Historically, the annual impairment review was performed as of June 30. Effective in 2016, the date for the annual impairment review was changed to October 31, in order to align more closely to its internal forecasting cycle. Both of these tests resulted that no impairment was indicated. To perform its goodwill impairment review, the Company uses a fair-value method, primarily the income approach, based on the present value of future cash flows. To perform its indefinite lived intangible assets impairment test, the Company uses a fair-value method, based on a relief of royalty valuation approach. Management’s judgments and assumptions about the amounts of those cash flows and the discount rates are inputs to these analyses. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit or indefinite lived intangible asset. Goodwill and other intangible assets are then subject to risk of write-down to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
The decline in oil prices and resulting slowdown in upstream oil & gas activity, as well as uncertainty in global macroeconomic factors related to infrastructure and construction, has caused the Company's customers to defer or reduce capital spending. Similar to other cranes manufacturers, we no longer expect near-term growth in the markets that was previously anticipated, and within the analyses performed in 2016 have revised our financial projections to reflect current market conditions, including lower sales. Additionally, the valuation of goodwill is particularly sensitive to management's assumptions of margin improvement, and an unfavorable change in those assumptions could put goodwill at risk for impairment in future periods.
As of the October 31, 2016 valuation, the Company's valuation of its trademarks and tradenames related to its Grove and Potain India brands are particularly at risk, with cushion between the calculated fair value and the book value of the intangible assets of approximately 25% and approximately 10%, respectively. The impact of a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate results in a decrease to the estimated fair value of each asset by approximately 14%, while a reduction in the terminal year sales growth rate assumption by 100 basis points would decrease the estimated fair value by approximately 11%. These trademarks and tradenames are potentially at risk for impairments in future periods if there are further significant unfavorable developments in their markets.
Other intangible assets with definite lives continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Definite lived intangible assets are also subject to impairment testing whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. A considerable amount of management judgment and assumptions are required in performing the impairment tests, principally in determining the fair value of the assets. While the Company believes its judgments and assumptions were reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair values and, therefore, impairment charges could be required.
The Company also reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company conducts its long-lived asset impairment analyses in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-5, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.” ASC Topic 360-10-5 requires the Company to group assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities and to evaluate the asset group against the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line depreciation method for financial reporting and on accelerated methods for income tax purposes.
The Company will continue to monitor market conditions and determine if any additional interim reviews of goodwill, other intangibles or long-lived assets are warranted. Deterioration in the market or actual results as compared with the Company’s projections may ultimately result in a future impairment. In the event the Company determines that assets are impaired in the future, the Company would need to recognize a non-cash impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and Results of Operations.



Cautionary Statements aboutRegarding Forward-Looking Information
StatementsAll of the statements in this report and inQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other company communications that are notthan historical facts, are forward-looking statements, whichincluding, without limitation, the statements made in the “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” As a general matter, forward-looking statements are basedthose focused upon our currentanticipated events or trends, expectations withinand beliefs relating to matters that are not historical in nature. The words “could,” “should,” “feel,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “preliminary,” “expect,” “believer,” “estimate,” “intend,” “intent,” “plan,” “will,” “foresee,” “project,” “forecast,” or the meaning of thenegative thereof or variations thereon, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
1995 provides a “safe harbor” for these forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (the “Company” or “Manitowoc”) notes that forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the Company's operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. These statements involveknown and unknown risks, uncertainties and uncertainties thatother factors could cause actual results to differ materially from what appears within this quarterly report.
Forward-looking statements include descriptions of plans and objectives for future operations, and the assumptions behind those plans. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “targets” and “expects,”matters expressed in, anticipated by or similar expressions, usually identifyimplied by such forward-looking statements. Any and all projections of future performance are forward-looking statements.
In addition to the assumptions,These risks, uncertainties and other information referredfactors include, but are not limited to:
unanticipated changes in revenues, margins, costs and capital expenditures;
the ability to specificallysignificantly improve profitability;
potential delays or failures to implement specific initiatives within the restructuring program;
issues relating to the ability to timely and effectively execute on manufacturing strategies, including issues relating to plant closings, new plant start-ups, and/or consolidations of existing facilities and operations, and its ability to achieve the expected benefits from such actions, as well as general efficiencies and capacity utilization of our facilities;
the ability to direct resources to those areas that will deliver the highest returns;
uncertainties associated with new product introductions, the successful development and market acceptance of new and innovative products that drive growth;
the ability to focus on customers, new technologies and innovation;
the ability to focus and capitalize on product quality and reliability;
the ability to increase operational efficiencies across Manitowoc’s businesses and to capitalize on those efficiencies;
the ability to capitalize on key strategic opportunities and the ability to implement Manitowoc’s long-term initiatives;
the ability to generate cash and manage working capital consistent with Manitowoc’s stated goals;
the ability to convert orders and order activity into sales and the timing of those sales;
pressure of financing leverage;
foreign currency fluctuation and its impact on reported results and hedges in place with Manitowoc;
changes in raw material and commodity prices;
unexpected issues associated with the quality and availability of materials, components and products sourced from third parties and the ability to successfully resolve those issues;
unexpected issues associated with the availability, operations and viability of suppliers;
the risks associated with growth or contraction;
geographic factors and political and economic conditions and risks;
actions of competitors;
changes in economic or industry conditions generally or in the forward-looking statements, a number of factors could cause actual results to be significantly different from what is presentedmarkets served by Manitowoc;
unanticipated changes in this quarterly report. Those factors include, without limitation, those included in "Risk Factors" in the 2015 10-K and the following:
Cyclicality of the construction industry; the effects of government spending on construction-related projects throughout the world; unanticipatedcustomer demand, including changes in global demand for high-capacity lifting equipment;equipment, changes in demand for lifting equipment in emerging economies; economies and changes in demand for used lifting equipment;
global expansion of customers;
the replacement cycle of technologically obsolete cranes; crude oil prices;
the ability of Manitowoc's customers to receive financing;
issues related to workforce reductions and demand for used equipment.potential subsequent rehiring;
Corporate - possible negative effects onwork stoppages, labor negotiations, labor rates and temporary labor costs;
government approval and funding of projects and the Company’s business operations, assets,effect of government-related issues or financial results as a result of the Spin-Off; changes in laws and regulations, as well as their enforcement, throughout the world; developments;
the ability to complete and appropriately integrate and/or transition, restructure and consolidaterestructurings, consolidations, acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances, joint ventures and other strategic alternatives; in connection with acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances and joint ventures, the finalization of the price and other terms, the realization of contingencies consistent with any established reserves, and unanticipated issues associated with transitional services; potential delays or failures to implement specific initiatives within restructuring programs;
realization of anticipated earnings enhancements, cost savings, strategic options and other synergies, and the anticipated timing to realize those savings, synergies and options; the successful development
impairment of innovative products and market acceptance of new and innovative products; the ability to focus and capitalize on product quality and reliability; issues relating to the ability to timely and efficiently execute on manufacturing strategies, including issues relating to plant closings, new plant start-ups,goodwill and/or consolidations of existing facilities and operations, and the Company's ability to achieve the expected benefits from such actions; efficiencies and capacity utilization of facilities; actions of competitors, including competitive pricing; availability of certain raw materials; changes in raw materials and commodity prices; unexpected issues associated with the quality of materials and components sourced from third parties and resolution of those issues; changes in domestic and international economic and industry conditions, including steel industry conditions and the price of oil; changes in the markets we serve; unexpected issues associated with the availability of local suppliers and skilled labor; changes in the interest rate environment; intangible assets;
unanticipated changes in capital and financial markets; risks associated with growth; foreign currency fluctuations and their impact on reported results and hedges in place; world-wide political risk; geographic factors and economic risks (including those related to the U.K.'s decision to exit the European Union); pressure of financing leverage; unanticipated changes in revenue, margins, costs and capital expenditures; work stoppages, labor negotiations, rates and temporary labor; issues associated with workforce reductions and subsequent ramp-up; growth of general and administrative expenses, including health care and post-retirement costs (resulting from, among other matters, U.S. health care legislation and reforms); unanticipated changes in consumer spending; the ability of our customers to obtain financing; the state of financial and credit markets; the ability to generate cash and manage working capital consistent with our stated goals; non-compliance with debt covenants; unexpected issues affecting the effective tax rate for the year; unanticipated issues associated with the resolution or settlement of uncertain tax positions; unfavorable resolution of tax audits;
unanticipated changes in customer demand; the abilitycapital and financial markets;
risks related to increase operational efficiencies and capitalize on those efficiencies; the ability to capitalize on key strategic opportunities; actions of activist shareholders; risks associated with data security and technological systems and protections;


changes in laws throughout the world;
natural disasters disrupting commerce in one or more regions of the world;
risks associated with data security and technological systems and protections;
acts of terrorism; government approval and funding of projects;
risks and other factors cited in Manitowoc's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
These statements reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to future events. The Company does not undertake, and hereby disclaims, any duty to update these forward-looking statements, even though its situation and circumstances may change in the future. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. The inclusion of any statement in this report does not constitute an admission by the Company or any other person that the events outside our control.or circumstances described in such statement are material.
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Company’s market risk disclosures have not materially changed since the 20152016 Form 10-K was filed.  The Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 20152016.


Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures:  The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:  OurThe Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). During the period covered by this report, we made no changes that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company’s risk factors disclosures have not materially changed since the 20152016 Form 10-K was filed, except those risks related to the Spin-Off not occurring and those specifically related to our former foodservice business are no longer applicable.filed. The Company’s risk factors are incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.
Item 6.  Exhibits
(a)   Exhibits:  See exhibit index following the signature page of this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.


SIGNATURES 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 2, 2016August 8, 2017The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
 (Registrant)
  
  
 /s/ Barry L. Pennypacker
 Barry L. Pennypacker
 President and Chief Executive Officer
  
 /s/ David J. Antoniuk
 David J. Antoniuk
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
TO FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SeptemberJune 30, 20162017
 
Exhibit No.Exhibit No. Description 
Filed/Furnished
Herewith
 Exhibit No. Description 
Filed/Furnished
Herewith
 

    
10.1
 Amendment No. 1, dated October 31, 2016, to Credit Agreement, dated March 3, 2016, among Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, and The Manitowoc Company, Inc., Manitowoc Cranes, LLC, Grove U.S. L.L.C., and Manitowoc Crane Group Germany GmbH, as borrowers". 
 
    
31
 Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certifications X(1)
 Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certifications X(1)

     
     
32.1
 Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 X(2)
 Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 X(2)

     
     
32.2
 Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 X(2)
 Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 X(2)

     
     
101
 The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes. X(1)
 The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes. X(1)
(1)  Filed Herewith
(2)  Furnished Herewith


3831