0000065984etr:GovernmentalMemberus-gaap:ElectricityMemberetr:EntergyArkansasMember2023-01-012023-06-30
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
X
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2023
OR
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13

OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________


Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.


Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299
1-11299ENTERGY CORPORATION1-35747ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC
(a Delaware corporation)
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone (504) 576-4000
72-1229752
1-35747
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a Louisiana corporation)Texas limited liability company)
1600 Perdido Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone (504) 670-3700
72-0273040670-3702
72-122975282-2212934
1-10764
1-10764ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC1-34360ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)a Texas limited liability company)
425 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone (501) 377-4000
71-0005900
1-34360
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(a Texas corporation)
10055 Grogans Mill Road2107 Research Forest Drive
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
Telephone (409) 981-2000
61-1435798
83-191866861-1435798
1-32718
1-32718ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC1-09067SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(a Texas limited liability company)
4809 Jefferson Highway
Jefferson, Louisiana 70121
Telephone (504) 576-4000
47-4469646
1-09067
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone (601) 368-5000
72-0752777
47-446964672-0752777
1-31508
1-31508ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.LLC
(a Mississippi corporation)Texas limited liability company)
308 East Pearl Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
Telephone (601) 368-5000
64-0205830
83-1950019





Table of Contents




Table of Contents

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
RegistrantTitle of ClassTrading
Symbol
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Entergy CorporationCommon Stock, $0.01 Par ValueETRNew York Stock Exchange
Common Stock, $0.01 Par ValueETRNYSE Chicago, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, LLCMortgage Bonds, 4.875% Series due September 2066EAINew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Louisiana, LLCMortgage Bonds, 4.875% Series due September 2066ELCNew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Mississippi, LLCMortgage Bonds, 4.90% Series due October 2066EMPNew York Stock Exchange
Entergy New Orleans, LLCMortgage Bonds, 5.0% Series due December 2052ENJNew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 2066ENONew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Texas, Inc.5.375% Series A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, No Par Value (Liquidation Value $25 Per Share)ETI/PRNew York Stock Exchange


Table of Contents
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy’s corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ No o


Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large
accelerated
filer
Accelerated

filer
Non-
accelerated
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller

reporting

company
Emerging

growth

company
Entergy Corporationü
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLCü
Entergy Louisiana, LLCü
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.LLCü
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.LLCü
Entergy Texas, Inc.ü
System Energy Resources, Inc.ü


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Common Stock OutstandingOutstanding at OctoberJuly 31, 20172023
Entergy Corporation($0.01 par value)180,251,407211,455,588


Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,LLC, Entergy New Orleans, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf.  Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company.  This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 20162022 and the Quarterly ReportsReport on Form 10-Q for the quartersquarter ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017,2023, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.





Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number
Page Number
Part I. Financial Information
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

i

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
i

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Statements of Operations
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Part II. Other Information

ii

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


In this combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, and future events or performance.  Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “goal,” “commitment,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “predict,” “forecast,” and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements.  Although each of these registrants believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct.  Any forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made.  Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, these registrants undertakeeach registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  There are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including (a) those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form 10-K and in this report, (b) those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities filings):


resolution of pending and future rate cases and related litigation, formula rate proceedings and related negotiations, including various performance-based rate discussions, Entergy’s utility supply plan, and recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;costs, as well as delays in cost recovery resulting from these proceedings;
long-term risks and uncertainties associated with the termination of the System Agreement in 2016, including the potential absence of federal authority to resolve certain issues among the Utility operating companies and their retail regulators;
regulatory and operating challenges and uncertainties and economic risks associated with the Utility operating companies’ participation in MISO, including the benefits of continued MISO participation, the effect of current or projected MISO market rules and market and system conditions in the MISO markets, the absence of a minimum capacity obligation for load serving entities in MISO and the consequent ability of some load serving entities to “free ride” on the energy market without paying appropriate compensation for the capacity needed to produce that energy, the allocation of MISO system transmission upgrade costs, the MISO-wide base rate of return on equity allowed or any MISO-related charges and credits required by the FERC, and the effect of planning decisions that MISO makes with respect to future transmission investments by the Utility operating companies;
changes in utility regulation, including, the beginning or end ofwith respect to retail and wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs, and the application of more stringent return on equity criteria, transmission reliability requirements, or market power criteria by the FERC or the U.S. Department of Justice;
changes in the regulation or regulatory oversight of Entergy’s owned or operated nuclear generating facilities, and nuclear materials and fuel, including with respect to the planned, potential, or actual shutdown of nuclear generating facilities owned or operated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, and the effects of new or existing safety or environmental concerns regarding nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel;
resolution of pending or future applications, and related regulatory proceedings and litigation, for license renewals or modifications or other authorizations required of nuclear generating facilities and the effect of public and political opposition on these applications, regulatory proceedings, and litigation;
the performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy’s generation resources, including the capacity factors at itsEntergy’s nuclear generating facilities;
increases in costs and capital expenditures that could result from changing regulatory requirements, changing economic conditions, and emerging operating and industry issues, and the operationrisks related to recovery of these costs and maintenance ofcapital expenditures from Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities require customers (especially in an increasing cost environment);
the commitment of substantial human and capital resources that can result in increased costsrequired for the safe and capital expenditures;reliable operation and maintenance of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities;
iii

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Continued)

Entergy’s ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related commodities;
prices for power generated by Entergy’s merchant generating facilities and the ability to hedge, meet credit support requirements for hedges, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price risk associated with those facilities, including the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants;
the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy’s ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;
volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, emissions allowances, and other energy-related commodities, and the effect of those changes on Entergy and its customers;

iii

Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)

changes in law resulting from federal or state energy legislation or legislation subjecting energy derivatives used in hedging and risk management transactions to governmental regulation;
changes in environmental laws and regulations, agency positions, or associated litigation, including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, greenhouse gases, mercury, particulate matter and other regulated air emissions, heat and other regulated airdischarges to water, waste management and water emissions,disposal, remediation of contaminated sites, wetlands protection and permitting, and reporting, and changes in costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations;
changes in laws and regulations, agency positions, or associated litigation related to protected species and associated critical habitat designations;
the effects of changes in federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and other governmental actions or policies, including changes in monetary, fiscal, tax, environmental, trade/tariff, domestic purchase requirements, or energy policies;policies and related laws, regulations, and other governmental actions;
the effects of full or partial shutdowns of the federal government or delays in obtaining government or regulatory actions or decisions;
uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and disposal and the level of spent fuel and nuclear waste disposal fees charged by the U.S. government or other providers related to such sites;
variations in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate the effects of hurricanes, ice storms, or other weather events and the recovery of costs associated with restoration, including accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery mechanisms, securitization, and insurance;insurance, as well as any related unplanned outages;
effects of climate change, including the potential for increases in extreme weather events and sea levels or coastal land and wetland loss;
the risk that an incident at any nuclear generation facility in the U.S. could lead to the assessment of significant retrospective assessments and/or retrospective insurance premiums as a result of Entergy’s participation in a secondary financial protection system and a utility industry mutual insurance company;
changes in the quality and availability of water supplies and the related regulation of water use and diversion;
Entergy’s ability to manage its capital projects, including by completing projects timely and within budget, to obtain the anticipated performance or other benefits of such capital projects, and to manage its operation and maintenance costs;
the effects of supply chain disruptions, including those originating during the COVID-19 global pandemic or driven by trade-related governmental actions, on Entergy’s ability to complete its capital projects in a timely and cost-effective manner;
Entergy’s ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
the economic climate, and particularly economic conditions in Entergy’s Utility service area and the Northeast United States and events and circumstances that could influence economic conditions in those areas, including power prices and inflation, and the risk that anticipated load growth may not materialize;
changes to federal income tax laws, regulations, and interpretive guidance, including the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, and the continued impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and any related intended or unintended consequences on financial results and future cash flows;
the effects of Entergy’s strategies to reduce tax payments;
changes in the financial markets and regulatory requirements for the issuance of securities, particularly as they affect access to capital and Entergy’s ability to refinance existing securities, execute share repurchase programs, and fund investments and acquisitions;
actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating agencies’ ratings criteria;
iv

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)

changes in the financial markets and regulatory requirements for the issuance of securities, particularly as they affect access to and cost of capital and Entergy’s ability to refinance existing securities and fund investments and acquisitions;
changes in inflation and interest rates;rates and the impacts of inflation or a recession on our customers;
the effecteffects of litigation, including the outcome and resolution of the proceedings involving System Energy currently before the FERC and any appeals of FERC decisions in those proceedings;
the effects of government investigations or proceedings;
changes in technology, including with respect(i) Entergy’s ability to effectively address and implement new or emerging technologies, (ii) the impact of changes relating to new, developing, or alternative sources of generation such as distributed energy and energy storage, renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand side management, and other measures that reduce load and government policies incentivizing development or utilization of the foregoing, and (iii) competition from other companies offering products and services to Entergy’s customers based on new or emerging technologies or alternative sources of generation;
Entergy’s ability to effectively formulate and implement plans to reduce its carbon emission rate and aggregate carbon emissions, including its commitment to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and the related increasing investment in renewable power generation sources, and the potential impact on its business and financial condition of attempting to achieve such objectives;
the effects, including increased security costs, of threatened or actual terrorism, cyber-attacks or data security breaches, physical attacks on or other interference with facilities or infrastructure, natural or man-made electromagnetic pulses that affect transmission or generation infrastructure, accidents, and war or a catastrophic event such as a nuclear accident or a natural gas pipeline explosion;
the effects of a catastrophe, pandemic (or other health related event), or a global or geopolitical event, such as the military activities between Russia and Ukraine, including economic and societal disruptions; volatility in the capital markets (and any related increased cost of capital or any inability to access the capital markets or draw on available bank credit facilities); reduced demand for electricity, particularly from commercial and industrial customers; increased or unrecoverable costs; supply chain, vendor, and contractor disruptions, including as a result of trade-related sanctions; delays in completion of capital or other construction projects, maintenance, and other operations activities, including prolonged or delayed outages; impacts to Entergy’s workforce availability, health, or safety; increased cybersecurity risks as a result of many employees telecommuting; increased late or uncollectible customer payments; regulatory delays; executive orders affecting, or increased regulation of, Entergy’s business; changes in credit ratings or outlooks as a result of any of the foregoing; or other adverse impacts on Entergy’s ability to execute on its business strategies and initiatives or, more generally, on Entergy’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity;
Entergy’s ability to attract and retain talented management, directors, and directors;employees with specialized skills;
Entergy’s ability to attract, retain, and manage an appropriately qualified workforce;
changes in accounting standards and corporate governance;governance best practices;
declines in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding requirements and the effects on benefits costs for Entergy’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefitbenefits plans;
future wage and employee benefitbenefits costs, including changes in discount rates and returns on benefit plan assets;
changes in decommissioning trust fund values or earnings or in the timing of, requirements for, or cost to decommission Entergy’s nuclear plant sites and the implementation of decommissioning of such sites following shutdown;
the decision to cease merchant power generation at all Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants by 2022, including the implementation of the planned shutdown of Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades;
the effectiveness of Entergy’s risk management policies and procedures and the ability and willingness of its counterparties to satisfy their financial and performance commitments; and
factors that could lead to impairment of long-lived assets;Entergy and
the its subsidiaries’ ability to successfully execute on their business strategies, including their ability to complete strategic transactions Entergythat they may undertake, including mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of any such strategic transaction, and the success of the business following any such strategic transaction.


undertake.
iv
v

Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS


Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
ALJAdministrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSCArkansas Public Service Commission
ASUAccounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
BoardBoard of Directors of Entergy Corporation
CajunCajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
capacity factorActual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City CouncilCouncil of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. CircuitCOVID-19U.S. Court of AppealsThe novel coronavirus disease declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and the Centers for the District of Columbia CircuitDisease Control and Prevention in March 2020
DOEUnited States Department of Energy
EntergyEntergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy CorporationEntergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.Predecessor company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Entergy Gulf States LouisianaEntergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes.  The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires. Effective October 1, 2015, the business of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana was combined with Entergy Louisiana.
Entergy LouisianaEntergy Louisiana, LLC, a Texas limited liability company formally created as part of the combination of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and the company formerly known as Entergy Louisiana, LLC (Old Entergy Louisiana) into a single public utility company and the successor to Old Entergy Louisiana for financial reporting purposes.purposes
Entergy TexasEntergy Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.  The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility business segmentactivities primarily comprised of the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating power plants to wholesale customerscustomers. In 2022, Entergy completed its multi-year strategy to exit the merchant nuclear power business and upon completion of all transition activities, effective January 1, 2023, Entergy Wholesale Commodifies is no longer a reportable segment.
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrickJames A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which was sold in March 2017
Form 10-KAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 20162022, filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles
Grand GulfUnit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWhGigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
HLBVHypothetical liquidation at book value
vi

Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS (Continued)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
IndependenceIndependence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power, LLC
Indian Point 2Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment

v

Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS (Continued)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
Indian Point 3Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ISOIndependent System Operator
kWKilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWhKilowatt-hour(s)
LPSCLouisiana Public Service Commission
LURCLouisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtuOne million British Thermal Units
MPSCMississippi Public Service Commission
MWMegawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWhMegawatt-hour(s)
Nelson Unit 6Unit No. 6 (coal) of the Nelson Steam Electric Generating Station, 70% of which is co-owned by Entergy Louisiana (57.5%) and Entergy Texas (42.5%) and 10.9% of which is owned by EAM Nelson Holding, LLC
Net debt to net capital ratioGross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents,
Net MW in operationInstalled capacity owned and operated which is a non-GAAP measure
NRCNuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPANew York Power Authority
PalisadesPalisades Nuclear Plant (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiaryas part of Entergy’s non-utility business, which ceased power production in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segmentMay 2022 and was sold in June 2022
Parent & OtherThe portions of Entergy not included in the Utility or Entergy Wholesale Commodities segments,segment, primarily consisting of the activities of the parent company, Entergy Corporation,
PilgrimPilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), and other business activity, including Entergy’s non-utility operations business which owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers and also provides decommissioning services to nuclear power plants owned by an Entergy subsidiarynon-affiliated entities in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segmentUnited States
PPAPurchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCTPublic Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant SubsidiariesEntergy Arkansas, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,LLC, Entergy New Orleans, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River BendRiver Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Louisiana
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
System AgreementAgreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources. The agreement terminated effective August 2016.
System EnergySystem Energy Resources, Inc.
TWhTerawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales AgreementAgreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by the FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
UtilityEntergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companiesEntergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas

vivii

Table of Contents


DEFINITIONS (Concluded)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
Vermont YankeeVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commoditiesas a part of Entergy’s non-utility business, segment, which ceased power production in December 2014 and was disposed of in January 2019
Waterford 3Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usageElectric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather
White BluffWhite Bluff Steam Electric Generating Station, 57% owned by Entergy Arkansas

viii

vii

Table of Contents

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Entergy operates primarily through two business segments:a single reportable segment, Utility. The Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.

The Utility business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.  
business in portions of Louisiana.

The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment includesAs discussed in Note 13 to the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. See “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below andfinancial statements in the Form 10-K, for discussionEntergy completed its multi-year strategy to exit the merchant nuclear power business in 2022 and upon completion of the operation and planned shutdown or sale of each of theall transition activities, effective January 1, 2023, Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants.

is no longer a reportable segment. Remaining business activity previously reported under Entergy Wholesale Commodities is now included under Parent & Other. Historical segment financial information presented herein has been restated for the second quarter 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 to reflect the change in reportable segments. The change in reportable segments had no effect on Entergy’s consolidated financial statements or historical segment financial information for the Utility reportable segment. See Note 7 to the financial statements herein for discussion of and financial information regarding Entergy’s business segments.



1

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Results of Operations


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 20162022 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:

Utility
Parent &
Other (a)

Entergy
(In Thousands)
2022 Net Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation$152,739 $6,964 $159,703 
Operating revenues(487,522)(61,648)(549,170)
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(52,733)(15,496)(68,229)
Purchased power(353,755)(10,336)(364,091)
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(859,564)— (859,564)
Other operation and maintenance(81,596)(36,225)(117,821)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits)— 164,066 164,066 
Taxes other than income taxes13,588 (2,254)11,334 
Depreciation and amortization25,810 (1,631)24,179 
Other income78,428 (6,774)71,654 
Interest expense17,268 6,739 24,007 
Other expenses7,745 (21,584)(13,839)
Income taxes516,193 (21,754)494,439 
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries and noncontrolling interests(3,538)— (3,538)
2023 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Entergy Corporation$514,227 ($122,983)$391,244 
  

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
  (In Thousands)
3rd Quarter 2016 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$447,782
 
$8,221
 
($62,799) 
$393,204
         
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits) (47,749) (4,637) (4) (52,390)
Other operation and maintenance 6,617
 (37,089) 1,831
 (28,641)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 
 (2,620) 
 (2,620)
Taxes other than income taxes 16,064
 (5,694) 28
 10,398
Depreciation and amortization 14,849
 (751) 242
 14,340
Other income 19,674
 16,574
 (1,624) 34,624
Interest expense (2,184) (41) 1,929
 (296)
Other expenses 5,584
 (8,860) 
 (3,276)
Income taxes (24,956) 19,448
 (10,603) (16,111)
         
3rd Quarter 2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$403,733
 
$55,765
 
($57,854) 
$401,644


(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.

(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer
Second quarter 2022 results of operations include: 1) a regulatory charge of $551 million ($413 million net-of-tax), recorded at Utility, as a result of System Energy’s partial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -SELECTED OPERATING RESULTSpending proceedings before the FERC; 2) a $283 million reduction in income tax expense as a result of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida securitization financing in May 2022, which also resulted in a $224 million ($165 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge, recorded at Utility, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the securitization regulatory proceeding; and 3) a gain of $166 million ($130 million net-of-tax), reflected in “Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits), as a result of the sale of the Palisades plant in June 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information with respectdiscussion of the System Energy partial settlement agreement. See Notes 2 and 3 to operating statistics.the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Entergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale of the Palisades plant.



1
2

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Operating Revenues
Net Revenue


Utility


Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:
2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$3,306 
$1,859
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(68(510))
Storm restoration carrying costs(59)
Volume/weather(47)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers16 
Retail electric price17113 
Other2023 operating revenues3$2,819
2017 net revenue
$1,811

The Utility operating companies’ results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

Storm restoration carrying costs, representing the equity component of storm restoration carrying costs, includes $37 million at Entergy Louisiana and $22 million at Entergy Texas, recorded in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the Entergy Louisiana storm cost securitization in May 2022 and the Entergy Texas storm cost securitization in April 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the storm cost securitizations.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather partiallyon residential sales.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from activity at the Utility operating companies in response to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes began in second quarter 2018. In the second quarter 2022, $16 million was returned to customers through reductions in operating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes for Entergy or the Utility operating companies for the second quarter 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues were offset by an increasereductions in industrial, residential, and commercial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily dueincome tax expense. See Note 2 to new customersthe financial statements in the primary metals industry, expansion projects inForm 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the chemicals industry,Tax Cuts and an increase in demand for existing customers in the chemicals, petroleum refining, and industrial gases industries.Jobs Act.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:


the implementation ofan increase in Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan rates ateffective January 2023;
an increase in Entergy Arkansas, as approved byLouisiana’s formula rate plan revenues, including increases in the APSC,distribution and transmission recovery mechanisms, effective withSeptember 2022;
increases in Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan rates effective August 2022 and April 2023;
an increase in Entergy New Orleans’s formula rate plan rates effective September 2022; and
an interim increase in the first billing cycleannual base rate, including the realignment of January 2017;
the costs previously being collected through the distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider to base rates, effective June 2023 and the implementation of the transmissiongeneration cost recovery factorrelate-back rider for the Hardin County Peaking Facility effective May 2023, each at Entergy Texas, effective September 2016,Texas.

3

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate, effective March 2017, as approved by the PUCT;Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
the timing of recovery of purchased power capacity costs at Entergy Louisiana through the formula rate plan mechanism.


The retail electric price variance was partially offset by:

lower storm damage rider revenues at Entergy Mississippi due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the November 2016 billing cycle. Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the September 2017 billing cycle; and
a decrease in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider at Entergy New Orleans primarily due to credits to customers as part of the Entergy New Orleans internal restructuring agreement in principle, effective with the first billing cycle of June 2017.


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate proceedings.regulatory proceedings discussed above.



Total electric energy sales for Utility for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
2

Table of Contents
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential9,027 9,493 (5)
Commercial6,969 7,203 (3)
Industrial13,301 13,480 (1)
Governmental608 641 (5)
Total retail29,905 30,817 (3)
Sales for resale3,171 3,920 (19)
Total33,076 34,737 (5)
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2017 to the third quarter 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$396
FitzPatrick sale(50)
Nuclear fuel expenses40
Other6
2017 net revenue
$392

As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $4 million in the third quarter2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017, partially offset by a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants and related assets. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of operating revenues.

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $726 million for the salesecond quarter 2022 to $644 million for the second quarter 2023 primarily due to:

a decrease of FitzPatrick.$25 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023 and a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities. See MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 146 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the impairmentspension and related charges.other postretirement benefits costs;

Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the third quarter2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
Owned capacity (MW) (a)3,962 4,880
GWh billed8,234 9,372
    
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet (b)
   
Capacity factor98% 90%
GWh billed7,633 8,674
Average energy and capacity revenue per MWh$48.82 $47.41

(a)The reduction in owned capacity is due to Entergy’s sale of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon in March 2017 and Entergy’s sale of its 50% membership interest in Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC in November 2016. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC sale.
(b)The Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants had no refueling outage days in the third quarter 2017 and the third quarter 2016.

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $592a decrease of $15 million for the third quarter 2016 to $599 million for the third quarter 2017 primarily due to:

the effects of recording in third quarter 2016 final court decisions in several lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement of approximately $14 million of spent nuclear fuel storagetransmission costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense.allocated by MISO. See Note 82 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussionfurther information on the recovery of the spent nuclear fuel litigation; andthese costs;
an increasea decrease of $11 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to prior year;
a decrease of $10 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to highera lower scope of work performed in 2023 as compared to prior year and lower nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, to positioncosts;
a gain of $7 million on the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. See “MANAGEMENT’S
partial sale of a service center at Entergy Texas in April 2023 as part of an eminent domain proceeding; and

3

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.

The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $13$6 million in fossil-fueled generationpower delivery expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement coststransmission repairs and a decrease of $5 million in storm damage provisions. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion on storm cost recovery.maintenance costs.


Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and increases in local franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments, including the assessment of ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017. Local franchise taxes increased primarily due to higher revenues in 2017 as compared to 2016.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service and an increase in depreciation rates at Entergy Texas, effective with the effectsapproval of recordingan interim increase in the third quarter 2016 final court decisionsannual base rate in several lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement of approximately $8 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as depreciation expense.June 2023. See Note 82 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2022 base rate case filing at Entergy Texas.

4

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other regulatory charges (credits) - net includes:

a regulatory charge of $224 million, recorded by Entergy Louisiana in second quarter 2022, to reflect its obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the spentEntergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization; and
a regulatory charge of $551 million, recorded by System Energy in second quarter 2022, to reflect the effects of the partial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to pending proceedings before the FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the partial settlement agreement.

In addition, Entergy records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and nuclear fuel litigation.decommissioning trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue.


Other income increased primarily due to:

an increase of $39 million in intercompany dividend income from affiliated preferred membership interests, related to storm cost securitizations;
a $32 million charge, recorded by Entergy Louisiana in second quarter 2022, for the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust I established as part of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida May 2022 storm cost securitization;
changes in decommissioning trust fund activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain decommissioning trust funds in 2022; and
an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017,2023, including the St. CharlesOrange County Advanced Power Station project,project.

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease of $8 million due to the recognition in second quarter 2022 of storm restoration carrying costs, primarily related to Hurricane Ida; and higher realized gains
an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits non-service costs as a result of an increase in the third quarter 2017 as compareddiscount rates used to value the benefits liabilities and the amortization of 2022 trust asset losses. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the third quarter 2016 onfinancial statements herein, and Note 11 to the decommissioning trust fund investments.financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs.


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Entergy Louisiana storm cost securitizations.

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

the issuance by Entergy Arkansas of $425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds in January 2023;
the issuance by Entergy Louisiana of $500 million of 4.75% Series mortgage bonds in August 2022; and
the issuance by Entergy Texas of $325 million of 5.00% Series mortgage bonds in August 2022.


5

Table of Contents
Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesCorporation and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Parent and Other

Operating revenues decreased primarily due to the absence of revenues from Palisades, after it was shut down in May 2022.

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $236 million for the third quarter 2016 to $199 million for the third quarter 2017 primarily due to the absence of other operation and maintenance expenses from the FitzPatrick plantPalisades, after it was soldshut down in May 2022.

Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits) for the second quarter 2022 includes a gain of $166 million as a result of the sale of the Palisades plant in June 2022.

Other income decreased primarily due to Exelonthe elimination for consolidation purposes of intercompany dividend income of $39 million from affiliated preferred membership interests, as discussed above, substantially offset by losses on Palisades decommissioning trust fund investments in March 2017.2022 and higher non-service pension income. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs.

Interest expense increased primarily due to higher variable interest rates on commercial paper in 2023, partially offset by the redemption by Entergy, in July 2022, of $650 million of 4.00% Series senior notes. See Note 134 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.Entergy’s commercial paper program.


Other income increasedexpenses decreased primarily due to higher realized gainsthe absence of decommissioning expense and nuclear refueling outage expense as a result of the shutdown and sale of Palisades in second quarter 2022.

See Note 14 to the financial statements in the third quarter 2017 as compared toForm 10-K for a discussion of the third quarter 2016 onshutdown and sale of the decommissioning trust fund investments.Palisades plant.


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was 37.6%25.6% for the thirdsecond quarter 2017.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.taxes.


The effective income tax rate was 39.6%183.8% for the thirdsecond quarter 2016.2022. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the thirdsecond quarter 20162022 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to statethe reduction in income tax expense as a result of the May 2022 securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. The high effective income tax rate was also driven by a loss before income taxes for the second quarter 2022 primarily caused by the regulatory charge recorded by System Energy as a valuation allowance recorded on a deferred tax asset,result of the partial settlement agreement and certain bookoffer of settlement. See Notes 2 and tax differences related3 to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Entergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the System Energy partial settlement agreement.



4

6

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022

Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:

Utility
Parent &
Other (a)

Entergy
(In Thousands)
2022 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Entergy Corporation$493,201 ($57,098)$436,103 
Operating revenues(267,687)(178,350)(446,037)
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale194,946 (31,731)163,215 
Purchased power(390,731)(4,697)(395,428)
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(807,465)— (807,465)
Other operation and maintenance(90,320)(74,788)(165,108)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits)— 163,321 163,321 
Taxes other than income taxes27,720 (11,097)16,623 
Depreciation and amortization47,962 (8,838)39,124 
Other income89,191 (2,142)87,049 
Interest expense36,272 11,947 48,219 
Other expenses15,451 (46,614)(31,163)
Income taxes374,709 (25,743)348,966 
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries and noncontrolling interests(5,368)— (5,368)
2023 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Entergy Corporation$911,529 ($209,350)$702,179 
  

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
  (In Thousands)
2016 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$1,027,751
 
$338,651
 
($165,367) 
$1,201,035
         
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits) 6,657
 (19,524) (17) (12,884)
Other operation and maintenance 87,381
 78,114
 2,534
 168,029
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 
 388,414
 
 388,414
Taxes other than income taxes 34,270
 (13,702) 419
 20,987
Depreciation and amortization 40,131
 1,837
 25
 41,993
Gain on sale of assets 
 16,270
 
 16,270
Other income 45,956
 73,341
 (971) 118,326
Interest expense (15,417) (81) 5,474
 (10,024)
Other expenses 15,924
 32,794
 
 48,718
Income taxes 100,337
 (331,093) (5,678) (236,434)
         
2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$817,738
 
$252,455
 
($169,129) 
$901,064


(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.

(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer to “ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS” for further information with respect to operating statistics.

Results of operations for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 include $422a $129 million ($274 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges due to costs being charged toreduction in income tax expense as incurred as a result of the impaired valueHurricane Ida securitization in March 2023, which also resulted in a $103 million ($76 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge, recorded at Utility, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet and a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $373 million as a result of tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant.securitization regulatory proceeding. See MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet and Note 102 to the financial statements herein for additionalfurther discussion of the tax elections.Entergy Louisiana March 2023 storm cost securitization.


Results of operations for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 include2022 include: 1) a reductionregulatory charge of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $238$551 million ($413 million net-of-tax), recorded at Utility, as a result of System Energy’s partial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to pending proceedings before the FERC; 2) a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal$283 million reduction in income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant; income tax benefitsexpense as a result of the settlementHurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida May 2022 securitization financing, which also resulted in a $224 million ($165 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge, recorded at Utility, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the 2010-2011 IRS audit, includingsecuritization regulatory proceeding; and 3) a $75gain of $166 million tax benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana($130 million net-of-tax), reflected in “Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits),” as a result of the sale of the Palisades plant in June 2022. See Note 2 to the treatmentfinancial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Vidalia purchased power agreementSystem Energy partial settlement agreement. See Notes 2 and a $54 million net benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55; and a reduction in expenses of $70 million ($44 million net-of-tax) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additionalfurther discussion of the income tax items andEntergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization. See Note 814 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the DOE litigation.

sale of the Palisades plant.
5

7

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Operating Revenues

Utility

Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the six months ended June 30, 2023 to the six months ended June 30, 2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2022 operating revenues$6,034 
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(347)
Volume/weather(122)
Storm restoration carrying costs(29)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers33 
Retail electric price198 
2023 operating revenues$5,767

The Utility operating companies’ results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales.

Storm restoration carrying costs, representing the equity component of storm restoration carrying costs, includes $37 million recorded by Entergy Louisiana in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the Entergy Louisiana storm cost securitization in May 2022 and $22 million recorded by Entergy Texas in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the Entergy Texas storm cost securitization in April 2022, partially offset by $31 million recorded by Entergy Louisiana in first quarter 2023, recognized as part of the Entergy Louisiana storm cost securitization in March 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the storm cost securitizations.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from activity at the Utility operating companies in response to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes began in second quarter 2018. In the six months ended June 30, 2022, $33 million was returned to customers through reductions in operating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes for Entergy or the Utility operating companies for the six months ended June 30, 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues were offset by reductions in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:

an increase in Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan rates effective January 2023;
an increase in Entergy Louisiana’s formula rate plan revenues, including increases in the distribution and transmission recovery mechanisms, effective September 2022;
increases in Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan rates effective August 2022 and April 2023;
an increase in Entergy New Orleans’s formula rate plan rates effective September 2022; and

8

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Net Revenue

Utility

Following is an analysisinterim increase in the annual base rate, including the realignment of the change in net revenue comparingcosts previously being collected through the nine months ended September 30, 2017distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider to the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$4,758
Retail electric price62
Grand Gulf recovery38
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation17
Volume/weather(99)
Other(11)
2017 net revenue
$4,765
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:

an increase in base rates, effective February 24, 2016 and the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017 at Entergy Arkansas, each as approved by the APSC. A significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016;
June 2023, the implementation of the transmissiongeneration cost recovery factorrelate-back rider at Entergy Texas,for the Hardin County Peaking Facility effective September 2016,May 2023, and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate, effective March 2017, as approved by the PUCT;
an increase in rates2022, each at Entergy Mississippi, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016; andTexas.
the timing of recovery of purchased power capacity costs at Entergy Louisiana through the formula rate plan mechanism.

The retail electric price variance is partially offset by a decrease in formula rate plan revenues for Entergy Louisiana, implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2016, to reflect the effects of the termination of the System Agreement.


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate proceedings. See Note 14 toregulatory proceedings discussed above.

Total electric energy sales for Utility for the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.

The Grand Gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs.

The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals and industrial gases industries, an increase in demand for existing customers in the chemicals industry, and expansion projects in the chemicals industry.


6

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 to the nine months ended September 30, 2016:2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential16,303 17,946 (9)
Commercial13,217 13,474 (2)
Industrial26,041 25,976 — 
Governmental1,185 1,226 (3)
Total retail56,746 58,622 (3)
Sales for resale7,674 7,562 
Total64,420 66,184 (3)
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$1,155
FitzPatrick sale(122)
Nuclear volume(76)
Nuclear fuel expenses76
FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement98
Other5
2017 net revenue
$1,136


As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $19 million in the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017 and lower volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick. The decrease was partially offset by a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants and related assets and an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with Exelon pursuant to which Exelon reimbursed Entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of FitzPatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had Entergy shut down FitzPatrick in January 2017. Revenues received from Exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement were offset in otheroperating revenues.

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $1,354 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 to $1,264 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 primarily due to:

a decrease of $42 million in compensation and taxesbenefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023, a decrease in net periodic pension and other than income taxespostretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities, and had no effect on net income.a revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2023. See Note 14 to the financial statementsMANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates in the Form 10-K, for discussion of the impairments and related charges. See Note 136 to the financial statements herein, and Note 1411 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the reimbursement agreement.pension and other postretirement benefits costs;

Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
Owned capacity (MW) (a)3,962 4,880
GWh billed22,616 26,484
    
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet   
Capacity factor79% 85%
GWh billed20,861 24,670
Average energy and capacity revenue per MWh$51.82 $48.99
Refueling outage days:   
FitzPatrick42 
Indian Point 2 102
Indian Point 366 
Pilgrim43 
Palisades27 

(a)The reduction in owned capacity is due to Entergy’s sale of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon in March 2017 and Entergy’s sale of its 50% membership interest in Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC in November 2016. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC sale.

7

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $1,688 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $1,776 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to:

an increasea decrease of $27 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labortransmission costs including contract labor, to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals and additional training and initiatives to support management’s operational goals at Grand Gulf, partially offsetallocated by a decrease in regulatory compliance costs. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews;
the deferral in the first quarter 2016 of $7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO post-Fukushima compliance and $9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO flood barrier compliance, as approved by the APSC in February 2016 as part of the Entergy Arkansas 2015 rate case settlement. These costs are being amortized over a ten-year period beginning March 2016.MISO. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussioninformation on the recovery of the rate case settlement;these costs;
a decrease of $14 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to prior year;
the effects of recording a final judgment in 2016 final court decisionsfirst quarter 2023 to resolve claims in several lawsuitsthe ANO damages case against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded includedinclude the reimbursement of approximately $16$10 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense.expenses. See Note 81 to the financial statements in the Form 10-Kherein for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation; and
a gain of $7 million on the partial sale of a service center at Entergy Texas in April 2023 as part of an increaseeminent domain proceeding.


9

Table of $13 million in transmissionContents
Entergy Corporation and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs;Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
an increase of $11 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2016.


The increasedecrease was partially offset by a decreasean increase of $11$15 million in fossil-fueled generationinsurance expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs.nuclear insurance refunds received in 2023.


Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and increases in local franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments, including the assessment of ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017. Local franchise taxes increased primarily due to higher revenues in 2017 as compared to 2016.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service includingand an increase in depreciation rates at Entergy Texas, effective with the Union Power Station purchasedapproval of an interim increase in March 2016.the annual base rate in June 2023. See Note 142 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2022 base rate case filing at Entergy Texas.

Other regulatory charges (credits) - net includes:

a regulatory charge of $103 million, recorded by Entergy Louisiana in first quarter 2023, to reflect its obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the Entergy Louisiana March 2023 storm cost securitization;
a regulatory charge of $224 million, recorded by Entergy Louisiana in second quarter 2022, to reflect its obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.Entergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization; and

a regulatory charge of $551 million, recorded by System Energy in second quarter 2022, to reflect the effects of the partial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to pending proceedings before the FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the partial settlement agreement.

In addition, Entergy records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and nuclear decommissioning trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue.

Other income increased primarily due to:

an increase of $62 million in intercompany dividend income from affiliated preferred membership interests related to higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio rebalancing in second quarter 2017, and storm cost securitizations;
an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017,2023, including the St. CharlesOrange County Advanced Power Station project.project;

changes in decommissioning trust fund activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain decommissioning trust funds in 2022; and

a $32 million charge, recorded by Entergy Louisiana in second quarter 2022, for the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust I established as part of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida May 2022 storm cost securitization as compared to a $15 million charge recorded by Entergy Louisiana in first quarter 2023, for the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust II established as part of the March 2023 storm cost securitization.

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease of $13 million due to the recognition in second quarter 2022 of storm restoration carrying costs, primarily related to Hurricane Ida; and
an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits non-service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities and the amortization of 2022 trust asset losses. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting
8

10

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $621 million forEstimates” in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $698 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to:

FitzPatrick’s nuclear refueling outage expenses and expenditures for capital assets being classified as other operation and maintenance expenses as a result of the sale and reimbursement agreements Entergy entered into with Exelon. These costs would have not been incurred absent the sale agreement with Exelon because Entergy planned to shut the plant down in January 2017. The expenses were offset by revenue realized pursuant to the reimbursement agreement and had no effect on net income. SeeForm 10-K, Note 136 to the financial statements herein, and Note 1411 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the reimbursement agreement;Entergy Louisiana storm cost securitizations.

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

the effectissuance by Entergy Arkansas of recording$425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds in 2016 final court decisionsJanuary 2023;
the issuance by Entergy Louisiana of $500 million of 4.75% Series mortgage bonds in litigation against August 2022; and
the DOE forissuance by Entergy Texas of $325 million of 5.00% Series mortgage bonds in August 2022.

Parent and Other

Operating revenues decreased primarily due to the reimbursementabsence of spent nuclear fuel storage costs, which reduced otherrevenues from Palisades, after it was shut down in May 2022.

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to the absence of expenses from Palisades, after it was shut down in 2016May 2022.

Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits) for the six months ended June 30, 2022 includes a gain of $166 million as a result of the sale of the Palisades plant in June 2022.

Taxes other than income taxes decreased primarily due to decreases in employment taxes due to the absence of expenses from Palisades, after its sale in June 2022.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due to the absence of depreciation expense from Palisades, after it was shut down in May 2022.

Other income decreased primarily due to the elimination for consolidation purposes of intercompany dividend income of $62 million from affiliated preferred membership interests, as discussed above, substantially offset by $42 million. losses on Palisades decommissioning trust fund investments in 2022, higher non-service pension income, and higher interest income primarily due to higher interest rates. See MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 86 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the DOE litigation;pension and other postretirement benefits costs.

an increase of $36 million in severance and retention costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016Interest expense increased primarily due to management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below andhigher variable interest rates on commercial paper in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.

The increase was2023, partially offset by a decrease due to the absenceredemption by Entergy, in July 2022, of other operation and maintenance expenses from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017.$650 million of 4.00% Series senior notes. See Note 134 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.Entergy’s commercial paper program.


The asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges variance is primarily due to $422 million ($274 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The increase in impairment charges in 2017 is primarily due to management’s decisions in the fourth quarter 2016 and the resulting impairments of the Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants and the timing of nuclear fuel spending and nuclear refueling outage spending for the impaired Pilgrim plant. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.

Taxes other than income taxesOther expenses decreased primarily due to the absence of ad valorem taxesdecommissioning expense and employment taxes from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.

The gain on sale of assets resulted from the sale in March 2017 of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant for approximately $110 million, including the $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $16 million on the sale. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.

Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including the result of portfolio rebalancing in second quarter 2017, and the increase in value from year-end realized upon the receipt from NYPA of the decommissioning trust funds for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants in January 2017. See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA.


9

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other expenses increased primarily due to increases in decommissioning expenses primarilynuclear refueling outage expense as a result of a trust transfer agreement Entergy entered into with NYPAthe shutdown and sale of Palisades in August 2016, which closed in January 2017, to transfer the decommissioning trusts and decommissioning liabilities for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants to Entergy and revisions to the estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ Indian Point 2 and Palisades plants as a result of revised decommissioning cost studies in the fourthsecond quarter 2016. See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA and the revised decommissioning cost studies. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in deferred refueling outage amortization costs related to the impairments of the Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants and related assets. 2022.

See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the impairmentsshutdown and related charges.sale of the Palisades plant.


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was (10.8%)7.3% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to tax elections to treat as corporations for federalthe reduction in income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards, and the re-determined tax basis of the FitzPatrick plantexpense as a result of its sale onthe March 31, 2017,2023 securitization of Hurricane Ida

11

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021, partially offset by the accrual for state income taxes. See NoteNotes 2 and 10 to the financial statements herein for furthera discussion of the tax elections and the tax benefit associated with the sale of FitzPatrick.Entergy Louisiana March 2023 storm cost securitization under Act 293.


The effective income tax rate was 11%(194.8%) for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to a tax election to treat as a corporation for federalthe reduction in income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in reduced income tax expense and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions as a result of the settlementMay 2022 securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the 2010-2011 IRS audit in Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021, the second quarter 2016, partially offset by stateamortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes.taxes, and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items. See NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additionala discussion of the effects of and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Entergy Louisiana May 2022 storm cost securitization.

Income Tax Legislation and Regulation

In April 2023 the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2023-15, which provides a safe harbor method of accounting that taxpayers may use to determine whether expenses to repair, maintain, replace, or improve natural gas transmission and distribution property must be capitalized and provides procedures for taxpayers to obtain automatic consent to change their method of accounting. Entergy intends to adopt this new method of income tax electionaccounting under the safe harbor in accordance with Revenue Procedure 2023-15, which is not expected to have a significant effect on the results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition of Entergy or the Registrant Subsidiaries.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, signed into law on August 16, 2022, significantly expanded federal tax incentives for clean energy production, including the extension of production tax credits to solar projects and certain qualified nuclear power plants. In June 2023 the IRS issued temporary and proposed regulations related to applicable tax credit transferability and direct pay provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are closely monitoring any potential impact associated with such federal tax settlements.

ANO Damage, Outage,incentives to assess the expected future effects on their results of operations, cash flows, and NRC Reviews
financial condition. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC ReviewsIncome Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, andInflation Reduction Act of 2022, including Entergy’s estimates regarding the deferral of replacement power costs.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.  Followingnew corporate alternative minimum tax. There are updates to that discussion.

Sale of FitzPatrick

In March 2017 the NRC approved the sale of the FitzPatrick plant, an 838 MW nuclear power plant owned by Entergy in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment, to Exelon. The transaction closed in March 2017 for a purchase price of $110 million, including the $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gainno effects on the sale of $16 million. At the transaction close, Exelon paid an additional $8 million for the proration of certain expenses prepaid by Entergy. See Note 13 to the financial statements hereinof Entergy or the Registrant Subsidiaries as of and for further discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick. As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, as a result of the sale of FitzPatrick, Entergy re-determined the plant’s tax basis, resulting in a $44 million income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.ended June 30, 2023.



10

12

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Planned Shutdown of Palisades

As discussed in the Form 10-K, most of the Palisades plant output is sold under a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Consumers Energy, entered into when the plant was acquired in 2007, that is scheduled to expire in April 2022. The PPA prices currently exceed market prices and escalate each year, up to $61.50/MWh in 2022. In December 2016, Entergy reached an agreement with Consumers Energy to amend the existing PPA to terminate early, on May 31, 2018. Pursuant to the agreement to amend the PPA, Consumers Energy would pay Entergy $172 million for the early termination of the PPA. The PPA amendment agreement was subject to regulatory approvals, including approval by the Michigan Public Service Commission. Separately, Entergy intended to shut down the Palisades nuclear power plant permanently on October 1, 2018, after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle.

In September 2017 the Michigan Public Service Commission issued an order conditionally approving the PPA amendment transaction, but only granting Consumers Energy recovery of $136.6 million of the $172 million requested early termination payment. As a result, Entergy and Consumers Energy agreed to terminate the PPA amendment agreement. Entergy will continue to operate Palisades under the current PPA with Consumers Energy, instead of shutting down in the fall of 2018 as previously planned. Entergy intends to shut down the Palisades nuclear power plant permanently in the spring of 2022. As a result of the change in expected operating life of the plant, the expected probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flows as of September 30, 2017 exceed the carrying value of the plant and related assets. Accordingly, nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets incurred at Palisades after September 30, 2017 will no longer be charged to expense as incurred, but will be recorded as assets and depreciated or amortized. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the updated calculation of the liability amortization associated with the PPA and see Note 14 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the associated asset retirement obligation revision.

Costs Associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities Strategic Transactions

Entergy expects to incur employee retention and severance expenses associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet of approximately $110 million in 2017, of which $89 million had been incurred as of September 30, 2017, and approximately $400 million from 2018 through the spring of 2022. In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities incurred impairment charges related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets of $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $422 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. These costs were charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. Entergy expects to continue to incur costs associated with nuclear fuel-related spending and expenditures for capital assets and, except for Palisades, expects to continue to charge these costs to expense as incurred because Entergy expects the value of the plants to continue to be impaired.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC operating licensing proceedings for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 and the settlement reached with New York State.  Following are updates to that discussion.

In accordance with the settlement with New York State, in March 2017 the New York State Department of State issued a concurrence with Indian Point’s new Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) consistency certification and, on Entergy’s motion, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissed Entergy’s appeal related to the initial Indian Point CZMA consistency certification. Also in March 2017 the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board of the NRC granted the motion of New York State and Riverkeeper to withdraw their pending contentions on

11

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

the NRC license renewal application and terminated the proceedings.  Subsequent to the issuance of the water quality certification and water discharge permit in January 2017 by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), in April 2017 the NYSDEC updated its environmental analysis to reflect the early shutdown per the settlement agreement. Both the water quality certification and the CZMA concurrence were filed with the NRC in April 2017.

In May 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging New York State’s actions in signing and implementing the Indian Point settlement with Entergy on the basis that the State failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions. All signatories to the settlement agreement, including the Entergy affiliates that hold NRC licenses for Indian Point, were named.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital.  Following are updates to that discussion.

Capital Structure and Resources


Entergy’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital66.8 %66.9 %
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.2 %)(0.3 %)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)66.6 %66.6 %
Effect of subtracting cash(1.0 %)(0.1 %)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)65.6 %66.5 %
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital64.6% 64.8%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.8%) (1.0%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)63.8% 63.8%
Effect of subtracting cash(0.9%) (2.0%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)62.9% 61.8%


(a)Calculation excludes the Arkansas, Louisiana, New Orleans, and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas, respectively.

(a)Calculation excludes the New Orleans and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Texas, respectively.

As of June 30, 2023, 19.3% of the debt outstanding is at the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and 80.2% is at the Utility. The remaining 0.5% of the debt outstanding relates to the Vermont Yankee credit facility, as discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements herein. Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper, capitalfinance lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, common shareholders’ equity, and subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  The debt to capital ratio excluding securitization bonds and net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds are non-GAAP measures. Entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.

Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in August 2022.June 2028.  The facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against 50%$20 million of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility.  The commitment fee is currently 0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount.  Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation.  The weighted averageweighted-average interest rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was 2.50%6.34% on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summaryAs of the borrowingsJune 30, 2023, amounts outstanding and capacity available under the $3.5 billion credit facility as of September 30, 2017:are:

CapacityBorrowingsLetters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500$150$3$3,347
12

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $150 $6 $3,344

A covenant in Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  The calculation of this debt ratio under Entergy Corporation’s credit facility is different than the calculation of the debt to capital ratio above.  Entergy is currently in compliance

13

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


with the covenant and expects to remain in compliance with this covenant.  If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companiesRegistrant Subsidiaries (except Entergy New Orleans)Orleans and System Energy) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the Entergy Corporation credit facility’s maturity date may occur.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ credit facilities.

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has a credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $100 million, which expires in January 2018. As of September 30, 2017, $80 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 2.56% on the drawn portion of the facility. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee also has an uncommitted credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $85 million, which expires in January 2018. As of September 30, 2017, there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the uncommitted credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Vermont Yankee facilities.


Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $1.5$2 billion. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, Entergy Corporation had $1.3 billion$1,108 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was 1.45%5.19%.


Equity Issuances and Equity Distribution Program

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Liquidity and Capital Resources- Sources of Capital -Equity Issuances and Equity Distribution Program” in the Form 10-K and Note 3 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of the equity distribution program.

Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida (Entergy Louisiana)

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2020 and October 2020, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta caused significant damage to portions of Entergy Louisiana’s service area. The storms resulted in widespread outages, significant damage to distribution and transmission infrastructure, and the loss of sales during the outages. Additionally, as a result of Hurricane Laura’s extensive damage to the grid infrastructure serving the impacted area, large portions of the underlying transmission system required nearly a complete rebuild. In February 2021 two winter storms (collectively, Winter Storm Uri) brought freezing rain and ice to Louisiana. Ice accumulation sagged or downed trees, limbs, and power lines, causing damage to Entergy Louisiana’s transmission and distribution systems. The additional weight of ice caused trees and limbs to fall into power lines and other electric equipment. When the ice melted, it affected vegetation and electrical equipment, causing additional outages. In August 2021, Hurricane Ida caused extensive damage to Entergy Louisiana’s distribution and, to a lesser extent, transmission systems resulting in widespread power outages.

In April 2022, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC relating to Hurricane Ida restoration costs. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Ida were estimated to be approximately $2.54 billion, including approximately $1.96 billion in capital costs and approximately $586 million in non-capital costs. Including carrying costs of $57 million through December 2022, Entergy Louisiana was seeking an LPSC determination that $2.60 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As part of this filing, Entergy Louisiana also was seeking an LPSC determination that an additional $32 million in costs associated with the restoration of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta as well as Winter Storm Uri was prudently incurred. This amount was exclusive of the requested $3 million in carrying costs through December 2022. In total, Entergy Louisiana was requesting an LPSC determination that $2.64 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2022 the LPSC approved financing of a $1 billion storm escrow account from which funds were withdrawn to finance costs associated with Hurricane Ida restoration. In June 2022, Entergy Louisiana supplemented the application with a request regarding the financing and recovery of the recoverable storm restoration costs. Specifically, Entergy Louisiana requested approval to securitize its restoration costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55 financing, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. In October 2022 the LPSC staff recommended a finding that the requested storm restoration costs of $2.64 billion, including associated carrying costs of $59.1 million, were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery from customers. The LPSC staff further recommended approval of Entergy Louisiana’s plans to securitize these costs, net of the $1 billion in funds withdrawn from the storm escrow account described above. The parties negotiated and executed an uncontested stipulated settlement which was filed with the LPSC in December 2022. The settlement agreement contains the following key terms: $2.57 billion of restoration costs from Hurricane Ida, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta,

14

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Hurricane Zeta, and Winter Storm Uri were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery; carrying costs of $59.2 million were recoverable; and Entergy Louisiana was authorized to finance $1.657 billion utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293. In January 2023, the LPSC approved the stipulated settlement subject to certain modifications. These modifications include the recognition of accumulated deferred income tax benefits related to damaged assets and system restoration costs as a reduction of the amount authorized to be financed utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293, from $1.657 billion to $1.491 billion. These modifications did not affect the LPSC’s conclusion that all system restoration costs sought by Entergy Louisiana were reasonable and prudent. In February 2023 the Louisiana Bond Commission voted to authorize the Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority (LCDA), a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana, to issue the bonds authorized in the LPSC’s financing order.

In March 2023 the Hurricane Ida securitization financing closed, resulting in the issuance of approximately $1.491 billion principal amount of bonds by the LCDA and a remaining regulatory asset of $180 million to be recovered through the exclusion of the accumulated deferred income taxes related to the damaged assets and system restoration costs from the determination of future rates. The securitization was authorized pursuant to the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation Act, Part VIII of Chapter 9 of Title 45 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. The LCDA loaned the proceeds to the LURC. Pursuant to Act 293, the LURC contributed the net bond proceeds to a State legislatively authorized and LURC-sponsored trust, Restoration Law Trust II (the storm trust II).

Pursuant to Act 293, the net proceeds of the bonds were used by the storm trust II to purchase 14,576,757.48 Class B preferred, non-voting membership interest units (the preferred membership interests) issued by Entergy Finance Company, LLC, a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Entergy. Entergy Finance Company is required to make annual distributions (dividends) commencing on December 15, 2023 on the preferred membership interests issued to the storm trust II. These annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be distributed to Entergy Louisiana and the LURC, as beneficiaries of the storm trust II. Specifically, 1% of the annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be distributed to the LURC for the benefit of customers, and 99% will be distributed to Entergy Louisiana, net of storm trust expenses. The preferred membership interests have a stated annual cumulative cash dividend rate of 7.5% and a liquidation price of $100 per unit. The terms of the preferred membership interests include certain financial covenants to which Entergy Finance Company is subject. Semi-annual redemptions of the preferred membership interests, subject to certain conditions, are expected to occur over the next 15 years.

Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the bonds issued by the LCDA on their balance sheets because the bonds are the obligation of the LCDA. The bonds are secured by system restoration property, which is the right granted by law to the LURC to collect a system restoration charge from customers. The system restoration charge is adjusted at least semi-annually to ensure that it is sufficient to service the bonds. Entergy Louisiana collects the system restoration charge on behalf of the LURC and remits the collections to the bond indenture trustee. Entergy Louisiana began collecting the system restoration charge effective with the first billing cycle of April 2023 and the system restoration charge is expected to remain in place for up to 15 years. Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the collections as revenue because Entergy Louisiana is merely acting as a billing and collection agent for the LCDA and the LURC. In the remote possibility that the system restoration charge, as well as any funds in the excess subaccount and funds in the debt service reserve account, are insufficient to service the bonds resulting in a payment default, the storm trust II is required to liquidate Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests in an amount equal to what would be required to cure the default. The estimated value of this indirect guarantee is immaterial.

From the proceeds from the issuance of the preferred membership interests, Entergy Finance Company loaned approximately $1.5 billion to Entergy, which was indirectly contributed to Entergy Louisiana as a capital contribution.


15

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, the securitization resulted in recognition of a net reduction of income tax expense of approximately $133 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions, by Entergy Louisiana. Entergy’s recognition of reduced income tax expense was offset by other tax charges resulting in a net reduction of income tax expense of $129 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions. In recognition of its obligations related to an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the securitization regulatory proceeding, Entergy Louisiana recorded in first quarter 2023 a $103 million ($76 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect its obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with customers.

As discussed in Note 3 and Note 12 to the financial statements herein, Entergy Louisiana consolidates the storm trust II as a variable interest entity and the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest is shown as noncontrolling interest in the financial statements. In first quarter 2023, Entergy Louisiana recorded a charge of $14.6 million in other income to reflect the LURC’s beneficial interest in the storm trust II.

Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital


See the table and discussion in the Form 10-K under “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Liquidity and Capital Resources- Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital,” that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 20172023 through 2019.2025. Following are updates to that discussion.

Renewables

Sunflower Solar

As discussed in the discussion.Form 10-K, in April 2020 the MPSC issued an order approving certification of the Sunflower Solar facility and its recovery through the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, subject to certain conditions. In May 2022 both Entergy Mississippi and the tax equity investor made capital contributions to the tax equity partnership that were then used to make an initial payment of $105 million for acquisition of the facility. Commercial operation at the Sunflower Solar facility commenced in September 2022. In April 2023 both Entergy Mississippi and the tax equity investor made additional capital contributions to the tax equity partnership that were then used to make the substantial completion payment of $30.4 million for acquisition of the facility. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s investment in the Sunflower Solar facility.


Preliminary Capital Investment Plan EstimateWalnut Bend Solar

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2021, the APSC directed Entergy Arkansas to file a report within 180 days detailing its efforts to obtain a tax equity partnership for 2018-2020

the purpose of acquiring the Walnut Bend Solar facility. In January 2022, Entergy Arkansas filed its tax equity partnership status report and will file subsequent reports until a tax equity partnership is developing its capital investment planobtained or a tax equity partnership is no longer sought. The counter-party notified Entergy Arkansas that it was terminating the project, though it was willing to consider an alternative for 2018 through 2020the site. Entergy Arkansas disputed the right of termination. Negotiations were conducted, including with respect to cost and currently anticipatesschedule and to updates arising as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. In April 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed an application for an amended certificate of environmental compatibility and public need with the APSC seeking approval by June 2023 for the updates to the cost and schedule that were previously approved by the APSC. In June 2023, Entergy Arkansas, the APSC general staff, and the Arkansas Attorney General filed a unanimous settlement supporting that the Utility will make approximately $10.7 billion in capital investments during that period and that Entergy Wholesale Commodities will make approximately $0.4 billion in capital investments, not including nuclear fuel, during that period. The preliminary Utility estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such asapproval of the Lake Charles Power Station, New Orleans Power Station, and Montgomery County Power Station, each discussed below, and the St. Charles Power Station; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investmentsWalnut Bend Solar facility is in the nuclear fleet; and other investments. The preliminary Entergy Wholesale Commodities estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments, such as the investments in the nuclear fleet, component replacement, software and security, and dry cask storage. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may varypublic interest based on the ongoing effects of business restructuring, regulatory constraintsterms in the settlement, which relate in part to certain treatment for the production tax credits associated with the facility. In July 2023, after requesting further testimony and requirements, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, changespurporting to modify several terms in project plans,the settlement and upon rehearing, the ability to access capital.

APSC approved the settlement largely on the terms submitted, including a 30-
13

16

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

year amortization period for the production tax credits. The project is currently expected to achieve commercial operation in 2024.
Lake Charles Power Station

West Memphis Solar

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2021 the APSC directed Entergy Arkansas to file a report within 180 days detailing its efforts to obtain a tax equity partnership for the purpose of acquiring the West Memphis Solar facility. In November 2016,April 2022, Entergy LouisianaArkansas filed anits tax equity partnership status report and will file subsequent reports until a tax equity partnership is obtained or a tax equity partnership is no longer sought. Closing had been expected to occur in 2023. In March 2022 the counter-party notified Entergy Arkansas that it was seeking changes to certain terms of the build-own-transfer agreement, including both cost and schedule. In January 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed a supplemental application with the LPSCAPSC seeking certificationapproval for a change in the transmission route and updates to the cost and schedule that the public convenience and necessity would be servedwere previously approved by the constructionAPSC. In March 2023 the APSC approved Entergy Arkansas’s supplemental application. The project is currently expected to achieve commercial operation in 2024.

2022 Solar Portfolio and Expansion of the Lake Charles Power Station, a nominal 994 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Westlake, Louisiana, on land adjacent to the existing Nelson plant in Calcasieu Parish. The current estimated cost of the Lake Charles Power Station is $872 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and other related costs. Geaux Green Option

In May 2017 the parties to the proceeding agreed to an uncontested stipulation finding that construction of the Lake Charles Power Station is in the public interest and authorizing an in-service rate recovery plan. In July 2017 the LPSC issued an order unanimously approving the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2020.

New Orleans Power Station
In June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility, which was retired effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The application included an updated cost estimate of $232 million for the 226 MW advanced combustion turbine. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million. In addition, the application renewed the commitment to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans.  In August 2017 the City Council established a procedural schedule that provided for a hearing in December 2017 with a City Council decision expected in February 2018. In October 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the New Orleans Power Station or, in one case, supporting a slightly smaller configuration of Entergy New Orleans’s alternative proposal. The commercial operation date is dependent on the alternative selected by the City Council and the receipt of other permits and approvals. 
Montgomery County Power Station

In October 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Montgomery County Power Station, a nominal 993 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Montgomery County, Texas on land adjacent to the existing Lewis Creek plant. The current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station is $937 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs. The independent monitor, who oversaw the request for proposal process, filed testimony and a report affirming that the Montgomery County Power Station was selected through an objective and fair request for proposal process that showed no undue preference to any proposal. In June 2017, parties to the proceeding filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. The stipulation contemplates that Entergy Texas’s level of cost-recovery for generation construction costs for Montgomery County Power Station is capped at $831 million, subject to certain exclusions such as force majeure events. The costs of the transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs included in the total current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station are not subject to the $831 million cap. Also in June 2017, the ALJ issued a proposed order and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for final decision. In July 2017 the PUCT approved the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2021.

Washington Parish Energy Center

In April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed a purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the acquisition of a peaking plant. Calpine will construct the plant, which will consist of two natural gas-fired combustion turbine units with a total nominal capacity of approximately 360 MW. The plant, named the Washington Parish Energy Center, will be located in Bogalusa, Louisiana and, subject to permits and approvals, is expected to be

14

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

completed in 2021. Subject to regulatory approvals, Entergy Louisiana will purchase the plant once it is complete for an estimated total investment of approximately $261 million, including transmission and other related costs. In May 2017,2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the Iberville/Coastal Prairie facility, which will provide 175 MW of capacity through a PPA with a third party, and the Sterlington facility, a 49 MW self-build project located near the deactivated Sterlington power plant. Entergy Louisiana is seeking to include these within the portfolio supporting the Geaux Green Option (Rider GGO) rate schedule to help fulfill customer interest in access to renewable energy. Entergy Louisiana has requested the costs of these facilities, as offset by Rider GGO revenues, be deemed eligible for recovery in accordance with the terms of the formula rate plan and fuel adjustment clause rate mechanisms that exist at the time the facilities are placed into service. The Louisiana Energy Users Group and the Alliance for Affordable Energy have intervened, and discovery is underway. A procedural schedule has been established with a hearing scheduled for December 2023 and settlement negotiations are ongoing. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Liquidity and Capital Resources- Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital - Renewables - 2021 Solar Certification and the Geaux Green Option” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Rider GGO.

Alternative RFP and Certification

In March 2023, Entergy Louisiana made the first phase of a bifurcated filing to seek approval from the LPSC for an alternative to the requests for proposals (RFP) process that would enable the acquisition of up to 3 GW of solar resources on a faster timeline than the current RFP and certification process allows. The initial phase of the filing established the need for the acquisition of additional resources and the need for an alternative to the RFP process. The second phase of the filing, which contains the details of the proposal for the alternative competitive procurement process and the information necessary to support certification, was filed in May 2023. In addition to the acquisition of up to 3 GW of solar resources, the filing also seeks approval of a new renewable energy credits-based tariff. Several parties have intervened, and a procedural schedule was established in May 2023 with a hearing scheduled for March 2024.

System Resilience and Storm Hardening

Entergy Louisiana

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2022, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking a public interest finding regarding Phase I of Entergy Louisiana’s Future Ready resilience plan and approval of a rider mechanism to recover the program’s costs. Phase I reflects the first five years of a ten-year resilience plan and includes investment of approximately $5 billion, including hardening investment, transmission dead-end

17

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


structures, enhanced vegetation management, and telecommunications improvement. In April 2018.2023 a procedural schedule was established with a hearing scheduled for January 2024.


The LPSC had previously opened a formal rulemaking proceeding in December 2021 to investigate efforts to improve resilience of electric utility infrastructure. In April 2023 the LPSC staff issued a draft rule in the rulemaking proceeding related to a requirement to file a grid resilience plan. The procedural schedule entered in the rulemaking proceeding contemplates adoption of a final rule in September 2023.

Entergy New Orleans

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2021 the City Council passed a resolution and order establishing a docket and procedural schedule with respect to system resiliency and storm hardening. In July 2022, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council a response identifying a plan for storm hardening and resiliency projects, including microgrids, to be implemented over ten years at an approximate cost of $1.5 billion. In February 2023 the City Council approved a revised procedural schedule requiring Entergy New Orleans to make a filing containing a narrowed list of proposed hardening projects, with final comments on that filing due July 2023. In April 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed the required application and supporting testimony seeking City Council approval of the first phase (five years and approximately $559 million) of a ten-year infrastructure hardening plan totaling approximately $1 billion. Entergy New Orleans also sought, among other relief, City Council approval of a rider to recover from customers the costs of the infrastructure hardening plan. In July 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed comments in support of its application.

Dividends


Declarations of dividends on Entergy’s common stock are made at the discretion of the Board.  Among other things, the Board evaluates the level of Entergy’s common stock dividends based upon earnings per share from the Utility operating segment and the Parent and Other portion of the business, financial strength, and future investment opportunities.  At its October 2017July 2023 meeting, the Board declared a dividend of $0.89$1.07 per share, an increase fromwhich is the previous $0.87same quarterly dividend per share that Entergy has paid since the fourththird quarter 2016.2022.


Cash Flow Activity


As shown in Entergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$224 $443 
Net cash provided by (used in):  
Operating activities1,826 816 
Investing activities(2,445)(3,224)
Financing activities1,589 2,545 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents970 137 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,194 $580 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$1,188
 
$1,351
    
Cash flow provided by (used in): 
  
Operating activities1,713
 2,252
Investing activities(2,828) (2,983)
Financing activities473
 687
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(642) (44)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$546
 
$1,307

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased by $539 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to:

an increase of $182 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
lower Entergy Wholesale Commodities net revenue, excluding the effect of revenues resulting from the FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement with Exelon, in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, as discussed above. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the reimbursement agreement;
an increase of $95 million in severance and retention payments in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” above and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet;

a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement and refund;18
proceeds of $23 million received in 2017 compared to proceeds of $64 million received in 2016 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed. See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation; and

15

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Operating Activities
a decrease
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $1,010 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due toto:

lower fuel costs and the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.costs. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery.recovery;

higher collections from Utility customers; and
a decrease of $220 million in storm spending primarily due to Hurricane Ida restoration efforts in 2022.

The decreaseincrease was partially offset by:


an increase of $36 million in interest paid;
income tax payments of $31 million in 2023 compared to income tax refunds of $12$7 million in 2017 compared to2022. Entergy had income tax payments in 2023 as a result of $80 million in 2016.higher estimated income taxes as compared to 2022. Entergy receivedhad income tax refunds in 2017 resulting from the carryback2022 as a result of net operating losses. Entergy madean overpayment on a prior year state income tax payments in 2016 related to the effect of the 2006-2007 IRS auditreturn; and for jurisdictions that do not have net operating loss carryovers or jurisdictions in which the utilization of net operating loss carryovers are limited. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the income tax audit; and
a decrease of $76$28 million in interest paid in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to an interest payment of $60 million made in March 2016 related to the purchase of a beneficial interest in the Waterford 3 leased assets. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s purchase of a beneficial interest in the Waterford 3 leased assets.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $155 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the purchase of the Union Power Station for approximately $949 million in March 2016 and proceeds of $100 million from the sale in March 2017 of the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase and Note 13 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.

The decrease was partially offset by:

an increase of $619 million in construction expenditures, primarily in the Utility business. The increase in construction expenditures in the Utility business is primarily due to an increase of $363 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending in 2017 on the St. Charles Power Station project and the Lake Charles Power Station project and a higher scope of work performed on various other fossil projects in 2017, an increase of $107 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2017, an increase of $87 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, an increase of $44 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, and an increase of $42 million in information technology construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on advanced metering infrastructure;
$113 million in funds held on deposit for principal and interest payments due October 1, 2017;
proceeds of $25 million received in 2017 compared to proceeds of $122 million received in 2016 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously capitalized.expensed. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation;spent nuclear fuel litigation.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $779 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

a decrease of $544 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to lower capital expenditures for storm restoration in 2023, partially offset by increased investment in the reliability and infrastructure of the distribution system;
fluctuationsa decrease of $281 million in net payments to storm reserve escrow accounts;
the initial payment of approximately $105 million in May 2022 as compared to the substantial completion payment of approximately $30 million in April 2023 for the purchase of the Sunflower Solar facility by the Entergy Mississippi tax equity partnership. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Sunflower Solar facility purchase;
cash collateral of $30 million posted in 2022 to support Entergy Texas’s obligations to MISO; and
a decrease of $28 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to lower capital expenditures for storm restoration in 2023, partially offset by increased investment in the reliability and infrastructure of the transmission system.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $105 million in non-nuclear generation construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending on the Orange County Advanced Power Station project and an increase of $75 million in nuclear fuel activity becauseconstruction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2023.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $956 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

proceeds from securitization of variations$1.5 billion received by the storm trust II at Entergy Louisiana in 2023 compared to proceeds from year to yearsecuritization of $3.2 billion received by the storm trust I at Entergy Louisiana in the timing2022; and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle.


16

19

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $214an increase of $42 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to:

long-term debt activity using approximately $309 thousandin common stock dividends paid in 2023 as a result of cash in 2017 compared to providing approximately $1,279 million of cash in 2016. Includedan increase in the long-term debt activity is $550 milliondividend paid per share and an increase in 2017 and $655 million in 2016 for the repaymentnumber of borrowings on the Entergy Corporation long-term credit facility; andshares outstanding.
a decrease of $87 million in 2017 in short-term borrowings by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities.


The decrease was partially offset by:


Entergy’slong-term debt activity providing approximately $216 million of cash in 2023 compared to using approximately $442 million of cash in 2022;
an increase of $84 million in net issuances of $928 million of commercial paper in 20172023 compared to net repayments2022; and
an increase of $158$60 million in prepaid deposits related to contributions-in-aid-of-construction for generation interconnection agreements as a result of commercial paperhigher deposits in 2016;2023 as compared to 2022.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and
in the redemptionsForm 10-K for a discussion of the Entergy Arkansas’s $75 million of 6.45% Series preferred stock and $10 million of 6.08% Series preferred stock in 2016.

For the details of Entergy’s commercial paper program, the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ short-term borrowings, and long-term debt seeLouisiana storm cost securitizations. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and NoteNotes 4 and 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.10-K for details of Entergy’s commercial paper program and long-term debt.


Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation” in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, and related regulatory proceedings.


State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding these proceedings.


Federal Regulation


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding federal regulatory proceedings.


Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments


Commodity PriceSee “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Market and Credit Risk

Power Generation

As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy Sensitive Instruments in the day ahead or spot markets.  In addition to selling the energy produced by its plants, Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells unforced capacity, which allows load-serving entities to meet specified reserveForm 10-K for a discussion of market and related requirements placed on them by the ISOs in their respective areas.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward physical power contracts consist of contracts to sell energy only, contracts to sell capacity only, and bundled contracts in which it sells both capacity and energy.  While the terminology and payment mechanics vary in these contracts, each of these types of contracts requires Entergy Wholesale Commodities to deliver MWh of energy, make capacity available, or

17

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

both.  In addition to its forward physical power contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to manage forward commodity price risk.  Certain hedge volumes have price downside and upside relative to market price movement.  The contracted minimum, expected value, and sensitivities are provided in the table below to show potential variations.  The sensitivities may not reflect the total maximum upside potential from higher market prices.  The information contained in the following table represents projections at a point in time and will vary over time based on numerous factors, such as future market prices, contracting activities, and generation.credit risk sensitive instruments. Following is a summary of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ current forward capacity and generation contracts as well as total revenue projections based on market prices as of September 30, 2017 (2017 represents the remainder of the year):an update to that discussion.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Portfolio
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Energy            
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):            
Unit-contingent (b) 88% 98% 70% 38% 70% 67%
Firm LD (c) 9% 8% —% —% —% —%
Offsetting positions (d) (9%) (9%) —% —% —% —%
Total 88% 97% 70% 38% 70% 67%
Planned generation (TWh) (e) (f) 7.6 28.0 25.5 17.9 9.7 2.8
Average revenue per MWh on contracted volumes:            
Minimum $39.8 $38.9 $43.3 $55.3 $59.8 $58.8
Expected based on market prices as of September 30, 2017 $39.8 $38.9 $43.3 $55.3 $59.8 $58.8
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change $39.8-$39.9 $38.9 $43.3 $55.3 $59.8 $58.8
             
Capacity            
Percent of capacity sold forward (g):            
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (h) 23% 22% 25% 36% 69% 99%
Capacity contracts (i) 38% 21% 10% —% —% —%
Total 61% 43% 35% 36% 69% 99%
Planned net MW in operation (average) (f) 3,568 3,568 3,167 2,195 1,158 338
Average revenue under contract per kW per month (applies to capacity contracts only) $8.3 $9.1 $10.5 $— $— $—
             
Total Nuclear Energy and Capacity Revenues (j)            
Expected sold and market total revenue per MWh $44.5 $46.7 $46.8 $49.1 $56.3 $47.7
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change $43.3-$45.7 $46.6-$46.7 $43.8-$49.8 $43.3-$55.0 $53.3-$59.3 $44.3-$51.0

(a)Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts, or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights. Positions that are not classified as hedges are netted in the planned generation under contract.
(b)Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, the seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages. Certain unit-contingent sales include a guarantee of

18

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

availability. Availability guarantees provide for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold.  All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(c)Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract, a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products. This also includes option transactions that may expire without being exercised.
(d)Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction.
(e)Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities resources considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions that affect dispatch.
(f)
Assumes the planned shutdown of Pilgrim on May 31, 2019, planned shutdown of Indian Point 2 on April 30, 2020, planned shutdown of Indian Point 3 on April 30, 2021, and planned shutdown of Palisades in the spring of 2022, and reflects the sale of FitzPatrick in March 2017. Assumes NRC license renewals for two units, as follows (with current license expirations in parentheses): Indian Point 2 (September 2013 and now operating under its period of extended operations while its application is pending) and Indian Point 3 (December 2015 and now operating under its period of extended operations while its application is pending). For a discussion regarding the planned shutdown of the Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” above and in the Form 10-K. For a discussion regarding the license renewals for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants” above and in the Form 10-K.
(g)Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions.
(h)A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold.
(i)A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market.
(j)Includes assumptions on converting a portion of the portfolio to contracted with fixed price cost or discount and excludes non-cash revenue from the amortization of the Palisades below-market purchased power agreement, mark-to-market activity, and service revenues.

Entergy estimates that a positive $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets in which the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business sells power, based on September 30, 2017 market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of $9 million for the remainder of 2017. As of September 30, 2016, a positive $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of $20 million for the remainder of 2016.  A negative $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets based on September 30, 2017 market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of ($9) million for the remainder of 2017. As of September 30, 2016, a negative $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of ($10) million for the remainder of 2016.


Some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plantsEntergy’s non-utility operations contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations under the agreements. The Entergy subsidiary is required to provide credit support based upon the difference between the current market prices and contracted power prices in the regions where Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells power.  The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty.guarantee.  Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of credit support. At SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had liquidity exposure of $105$11 million under the guarantees in place supporting Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility operations transactions and $9$6 million of posted cash collateral.  In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of September 30, 2017, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $50 million of additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements. As of September 30, 2017, the liquidity exposure associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities assurance requirements, including return of previously posted collateral from counterparties, would increase by $295 million for a $1 per MMBtu increase in gas prices in both the short-and long-term markets.  


19

20

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

As of September 30, 2017, substantially all of the credit exposure associated with the planned energy output under contract for Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants through 2022 is with counterparties or their guarantors that have public investment grade credit ratings.

Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The followingFollowing is an update to that discussion.


Indian PointNRC Reactor Oversight Process


During the scheduled refueling and maintenance outage at Indian Point 2As discussed in the first quarter 2016, comprehensive inspections were done as partForm 10-K, the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process is a program to collect information about plant performance, assess the information for its safety significance, and provide for appropriate licensee and NRC response. The NRC evaluates plant performance by analyzing two distinct inputs: inspection findings resulting from the NRC’s inspection program and performance indicators reported by the licensee. The evaluations result in the placement of each plant in one of the aging management program that callsNRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix columns: “licensee response column,” or Column 1, “regulatory response column,” or Column 2, “degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 3, “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4, and “unacceptable performance,” or Column 5. Plants in Column 1 are subject to normal NRC inspection activities. Plants in Column 2, Column 3, or Column 4 are subject to progressively increasing levels of inspection by the NRC with, in general, progressively increasing levels of associated costs. Continued plant operation is not permitted for plants in Column 5. All of the nuclear generating plants owned and operated by Entergy’s Utility business are currently in Column 1, except River Bend, which is in Column 2.

In September 2022 the NRC placed Waterford 3 in Column 2 based on an in-deptherror associated with a radiation monitor calibration. Entergy corrected the issue with the radiation monitor in February 2022 and also corrected a subsequent radiation monitor calibration issue. In May 2023 the NRC completed a supplemental inspection of the reactor vessel.  Inspections of more than 2,000 boltsWaterford 3 in the reactor’s removable insert liner identified issuesaccordance with roughly 11% of the bolts that required further analysis.  Entergy replaced bolts as appropriate,its inspection procedures for nuclear plants in Column 2 and the unitWaterford 3 was returned to serviceColumn 1.

In July 2023 the NRC placed River Bend in June 2016. In 2016, Entergy evaluatedColumn 2, effective April 2023, based on failure to inspect wiring associated with the scope and durationhigh pressure core spray system. River Bend will remain in Column 2 pending successful completion of Indian Point 3’s scheduled refueling outage planned for 2017, which began in March 2017. Based on the results of the 2016 evaluation and analysis, Entergy extended Indian Point 3’s planned 2017 outage duration. Entergy performed the same in-depth inspection of the reactor vessel at Indian Point 3 during Indian Point 3’s spring 2017 refueling and maintenance outage that it performed for Indian Point 2. Based on inspection data, Entergy replaced approximately the same number of bolts at Indian Point 3 that it replaced at Indian Point 2 before returning the plant to service in May 2017.a supplemental inspection.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - New Accounting PronouncementsNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements. Following are updates to that discussion.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018.  Entergy has selected the modified retrospective transition method. Entergy’s evaluation of ASU 2014-09 has not identified any effects that it expects will affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows, other than changes in required financial statement disclosures. Entergy continues to monitor the development and finalization of industry-specific application guidance that could have an effect on this assessment.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018. The ASU requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity asset transfers, other than inventory, at the time the transfer occurs.  Entergy is evaluating the ASU and currently expects to record a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, ASU No. 2016-01 “Financial Instruments (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018. Unrealized gains and losses on investments in equity securities held by the nuclear decommissioning trust funds will be required

20

21

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

to be recorded in earnings rather than in other comprehensive income. In accordance with the regulatory treatment of the decommissioning trust funds of Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy, an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/losses will continue to be recorded in other regulatory liabilities/assets. Entergy expects to record an adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 for the cumulative effect of the unrealized gains and losses on investments in equity securities held by the decommissioning trust funds that do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment.

In March 2017 the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The ASU requires entities to report the service cost component of defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost (net benefit cost) in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period.  The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations.  In addition, the ASU allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization.  ASU 2017-07 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018.  Entergy does not expect ASU 2017-07 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In August 2017 the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.”  The ASU makes a number of amendments to hedge accounting, most significantly changing the recognition and presentation of highly effective hedges.  Upon adoption of the standard there will no longer be separate recognition or presentation of the ineffective portion of highly effective hedges.  In addition, the ASU allows entities to designate a contractually-specified component as the hedged risk, simplifies the process for assessing the effectiveness of hedges, and adds additional disclosure requirements for hedges.  ASU 2017-12 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2019, with early adoption permitted.  Entergy expects that ASU 2017-12 will affect its net income by eliminating volatility in earnings related to the ineffective portion of designated hedges on nuclear power sales.  Entergy is evaluating ASU 2017-12 for other effects on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$2,785,244 $3,258,255 $5,668,654 $5,914,031 
Natural gas33,503 48,008 98,084 120,369 
Other27,279 88,933 60,347 238,722 
TOTAL2,846,026 3,395,196 5,827,085 6,273,122 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale583,717 651,946 1,482,100 1,318,885 
Purchased power206,536 570,627 444,823 840,251 
Nuclear refueling outage expenses34,785 36,917 72,018 79,918 
Other operation and maintenance659,894 777,715 1,291,421 1,456,529 
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits)— (164,066)— (163,321)
Decommissioning51,152 62,859 101,644 124,907 
Taxes other than income taxes183,578 172,244 369,015 352,392 
Depreciation and amortization468,938 444,759 922,855 883,731 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(98,501)761,063 (74,827)732,638 
TOTAL2,090,099 3,314,064 4,609,049 5,625,930 
OPERATING INCOME755,927 81,132 1,218,036 647,192 
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction24,867 13,568 48,013 29,440 
Interest and investment income (loss)45,428 (99,049)93,687 (120,968)
Miscellaneous - net(48,544)35,578 (102,997)43,182 
TOTAL21,751 (49,903)38,703 (48,346)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense261,349 231,613 516,678 459,235 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(10,481)(4,752)(20,072)(10,848)
TOTAL250,868 226,861 496,606 448,387 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES526,810 (195,632)760,133 150,459 
Income taxes134,796 (359,643)55,821 (293,145)
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME392,014 164,011 704,312 443,604 
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries and noncontrolling interests770 4,308 2,133 7,501 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION$391,244 $159,703 $702,179 $436,103 
Earnings per average common share:
Basic$1.85 $0.79 $3.32 $2.15 
Diluted$1.84 $0.78 $3.31 $2.13 
Basic average number of common shares outstanding211,449,211 203,383,199 211,400,230 203,164,628 
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding212,201,529 204,712,242 212,173,254 204,291,597 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

22
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES       
Electric
$2,793,798
 
$2,624,562
 
$7,056,758
 
$6,760,054
Natural gas26,585
 24,796
 100,011
 95,530
Competitive businesses423,245
 475,345
 1,293,867
 1,341,534
TOTAL3,243,628
 3,124,703
 8,450,636
 8,197,118
        
OPERATING EXPENSES       
Operation and Maintenance:       
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale612,950
 460,990
 1,426,462
 1,347,422
Purchased power408,140
 375,107
 1,182,404
 880,102
Nuclear refueling outage expenses43,273
 56,675
 124,126
 154,951
Other operation and maintenance804,535
 833,176
 2,492,379
 2,324,350
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges16,221
 18,841
 421,584
 33,170
Decommissioning95,392
 85,266
 310,062
 230,519
Taxes other than income taxes159,474
 149,076
 469,090
 448,103
Depreciation and amortization354,739
 340,399
 1,052,332
 1,010,339
Other regulatory charges (credits)19,435
 33,113
 (59,314) 55,626
TOTAL2,514,159
 2,352,643
 7,419,125
 6,484,582
        
Gain on sale of assets
 
 16,270
 
        
OPERATING INCOME729,469
 772,060
 1,047,781
 1,712,536
        
OTHER INCOME       
Allowance for equity funds used during construction24,338
 15,451
 65,722
 48,242
Interest and investment income58,332
 37,534
 194,978
 116,662
Miscellaneous - net(1,801) (6,740) (3,172) (25,702)
TOTAL80,869
 46,245
 257,528
 139,202
        
INTEREST EXPENSE       
Interest expense178,391
 174,902
 522,857
 526,344
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(11,492) (7,707) (31,057) (24,520)
TOTAL166,899
 167,195
 491,800
 501,824
        
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES643,439
 651,110
 813,509
 1,349,914
        
Income taxes241,795
 257,906
 (87,555) 148,879
        
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME401,644
 393,204
 901,064
 1,201,035
        
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries3,446
 5,034
 10,338
 15,586
        
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
$398,198
 
$388,170
 
$890,726
 
$1,185,449
        
Earnings per average common share:       
Basic
$2.22
 
$2.17
 
$4.96
 
$6.63
Diluted
$2.21
 
$2.16
 
$4.94
 
$6.60
Dividends declared per common share
$0.87
 
$0.85
 
$2.61
 
$2.55
        
Basic average number of common shares outstanding179,563,819
 179,023,351
 179,458,914
 178,804,148
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding180,464,069
 179,990,888
 180,163,074
 179,490,060
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       

Table of Contents

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)
Net Income$392,014 $164,011 $704,312 $443,604 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (net of tax expense of $—, $—, $—, and $—)— 24 — 48 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense (benefit) of ($1,065), $1,642, ($335), and $4,184)(3,292)6,045 (1,265)14,373 
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of $—, $3,768, $—, and ($3,453))— 6,471 — (5,931)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(3,292)12,540 (1,265)8,490 
Comprehensive Income388,722 176,551 703,047 452,094 
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries and noncontrolling interests770 4,308 2,133 7,501 
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation$387,952 $172,243 $700,914 $444,593 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

23
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
        
Net Income
$401,644
 
$393,204
 
$901,064
 
$1,201,035

       
Other comprehensive income (loss)       
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of $7,062, $11,172, $17,387, and ($28,605))13,213
 20,972
 32,634
 (52,575)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $6,818, $4,064, $19,034, and $7,101)12,297
 5,044
 31,845
 17,649
Net unrealized investment gains (net of tax expense of $30,644, $20,635, $72,808, and $58,508)33,395
 21,367
 82,918
 65,391
Foreign currency translation (net of tax benefit of $-, $48, $403, and $688)
 (92) (748) (1,280)
Other comprehensive income58,905
 47,291
 146,649
 29,185

       
Comprehensive Income460,549
 440,495
 1,047,713
 1,230,220
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries3,446
 5,034
 10,338
 15,586
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation
$457,103
 
$435,461
 
$1,037,375
 
$1,214,634
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       

Table of Contents



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Consolidated net income$704,312 $443,604 
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization1,116,843 1,113,954 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued43,502 (274,139)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges (credits)— (163,321)
Changes in working capital:
Receivables65,259 (224,499)
Fuel inventory(43,493)16,381 
Accounts payable(267,820)42,915 
Taxes accrued(25,080)(420)
Interest accrued6,807 (11,947)
Deferred fuel costs563,610 (667,247)
Other working capital accounts(148,738)(136,853)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses(16,564)295,987 
Changes in other regulatory assets391,188 724,227 
Changes in other regulatory liabilities308,058 15,788 
Effect of securitization on regulatory asset(491,150)(1,036,955)
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities(128,379)(167,682)
Other(252,383)846,170 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
1,825,972 815,963 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction/capital expenditures(2,311,465)(2,720,596)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction48,013 29,440 
Nuclear fuel purchases(134,698)(114,843)
Payment for purchase of assets(30,433)(105,149)
Net proceeds (payments) from sale of assets11,000 (7,082)
Insurance proceeds received for property damages6,184 — 
Litigation proceeds from settlement agreement— 9,829 
Changes in securitization account7,803 337 
Payments to storm reserve escrow account(9,080)(1,290,314)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account— 1,000,218 
Decrease (increase) in other investments262 (36,057)
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs17,933 32,367 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales435,903 1,099,503 
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds(486,853)(1,121,635)
Net cash flow used in investing activities(2,445,431)(3,223,982)
See Notes to Financial Statements.

24

Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Consolidated net income 
$901,064
 
$1,201,035
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 1,561,565
 1,548,872
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued (90,607) 119,603
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 241,838
 33,170
Gain on sale of assets (16,270) 
Changes in working capital:    
Receivables (198,029) (270,847)
Fuel inventory 20,746
 28,900
Accounts payable (75,962) 99,933
Taxes accrued 66,895
 29,429
Interest accrued (6,111) (13,487)
Deferred fuel costs (117,636) (159,592)
Other working capital accounts (81,779) (78,553)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses (10,073) 2,760
Changes in other regulatory assets 117,430
 164,716
Changes in other regulatory liabilities 22,124
 110,999
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities (354,297) (305,200)
Other (268,147) (259,343)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 1,712,751
 2,252,395
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction/capital expenditures (2,622,104) (2,003,427)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 66,437
 48,807
Nuclear fuel purchases (226,054) (160,343)
Payment for purchase of plant 
 (949,329)
Proceeds from sale of assets 100,000
 
Insurance proceeds received for property damages 26,157
 
Changes in securitization account (6,494) (3,911)
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (1,925) (1,203)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 8,836
 
Decreases (increases) in other investments (112,217) 12,374
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs 25,493
 122,488
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 1,902,783
 1,796,566
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (1,988,634) (1,844,514)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (2,827,722) (2,982,492)
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of:
Long-term debt2,489,886 3,851,061 
Treasury stock4,078 26,952 
Retirement of long-term debt(2,273,773)(4,293,423)
Changes in credit borrowings and commercial paper - net280,765 196,694 
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interest25,708 9,595 
Proceeds received by storm trust related to securitization1,457,676 3,163,572 
Other66,898 10,523 
Dividends paid:
Common stock(452,442)(410,466)
Preferred stock(9,159)(9,159)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities1,589,637 2,545,349 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents970,178 137,330 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period224,164 442,559 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,194,342 $579,889 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$490,201 $454,666 
Income taxes$31,231 ($7,485)
See Notes to Financial Statements.

25
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of:    
Long-term debt 1,222,606
 5,508,461
Treasury stock 15,121
 33,120
Retirement of long-term debt (1,222,915) (4,229,599)
Repurchase/redemption of preferred stock 
 (85,283)
Changes in credit borrowings and commercial paper - net 937,677
 (60,985)
Other (337) (6,204)
Dividends paid:    
Common stock (468,396) (455,993)
Preferred stock (10,338) (16,947)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 473,418
 686,570

    
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (641,553) (43,527)

    
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,187,844
 1,350,961

    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$546,291
 
$1,307,434
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$507,912
 
$584,362
Income taxes 
($11,883) 
$79,988
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

Table of Contents


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$67,721 $115,290 
Temporary cash investments1,126,621 108,874 
Total cash and cash equivalents1,194,342 224,164 
Accounts receivable:
Customer646,767 788,552 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(21,840)(30,856)
Other213,773 241,702 
Accrued unbilled revenues591,298 495,859 
Total accounts receivable1,429,998 1,495,257 
Deferred fuel costs182,387 710,401 
Fuel inventory - at average cost191,125 147,632 
Materials and supplies - at average cost1,307,737 1,183,308 
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs163,187 143,653 
Prepayments and other223,838 190,611 
TOTAL4,692,614 4,095,026 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds4,560,006 4,121,864 
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)416,431 366,405 
Storm reserve escrow accounts411,035 401,955 
Other99,851 102,259 
TOTAL5,487,323 4,992,483 
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Electric65,268,344 64,646,911 
Natural gas705,566 691,970 
Construction work in progress2,190,958 1,844,171 
Nuclear fuel596,045 582,119 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT68,760,913 67,765,171 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization25,902,180 25,288,047 
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - NET42,858,733 42,477,124 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $268,738 as of June 30, 2023 and $282,886 as of December 31, 2022)5,645,209 6,036,397 
Deferred fuel costs241,085 241,085 
Goodwill377,172 377,172 
Accumulated deferred income taxes69,912 84,100 
Other345,188 291,804 
TOTAL6,678,566 7,030,558 
TOTAL ASSETS$59,717,236 $58,595,191 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

26

Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$87,297
 
$129,579
Temporary cash investments 458,994
 1,058,265
Total cash and cash equivalents 546,291
 1,187,844
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 754,484
 654,995
Allowance for doubtful accounts (13,569) (11,924)
Other 152,329
 158,419
Accrued unbilled revenues 420,099
 368,677
Total accounts receivable 1,313,343
 1,170,167
Deferred fuel costs 185,066
 108,465
Fuel inventory - at average cost 158,854
 179,600
Materials and supplies - at average cost 719,782
 698,523
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 181,571
 146,221
Prepayments and other 366,324
 193,448
TOTAL 3,471,231
 3,684,268
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Investment in affiliates - at equity 198
 198
Decommissioning trust funds 6,982,928
 5,723,897
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 252,621
 233,641
Other 447,349
 469,664
TOTAL 7,683,096
 6,427,400
     
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric 46,190,075
 45,191,216
Property under capital lease 618,321
 619,527
Natural gas 435,313
 413,224
Construction work in progress 2,191,320
 1,378,180
Nuclear fuel 905,837
 1,037,899
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT 50,340,866
 48,640,046
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 21,380,100
 20,718,639
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - NET 28,960,766
 27,921,407
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 775,148
 761,280
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $513,223 as of September 30, 2017 and $600,996 as of December 31, 2016) 4,638,615
 4,769,913
Deferred fuel costs 239,248
 239,100
Goodwill 377,172
 377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes 123,953
 117,885
Other 129,213
 1,606,009
TOTAL 6,283,349
 7,871,359
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$46,398,442
 
$45,904,434
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt$1,849,046 $2,309,037 
Notes payable and commercial paper1,108,386 827,621 
Accounts payable1,523,747 1,777,590 
Customer deposits434,462 424,723 
Taxes accrued399,011 424,091 
Interest accrued202,071 195,264 
Deferred fuel costs35,596 — 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities89,074 104,845 
Sale-leaseback/depreciation regulatory liability— 103,497 
Other239,889 202,779 
TOTAL5,881,282 6,369,447 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued4,871,117 4,818,837 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits206,966 211,220 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net1,225,578 1,258,276 
Other regulatory liabilities2,768,843 2,324,590 
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities4,383,482 4,271,531 
Accumulated provisions514,637 531,201 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities1,100,947 1,213,555 
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $278,134 as of June 30, 2023 and $292,760 as of December 31, 2022)24,321,681 23,623,512 
Other855,748 688,720 
TOTAL40,248,999 38,941,442 
Commitments and Contingencies
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund219,410 219,410 
EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares in 2023 and 2022; issued shares in 2023 and 2022 - none— — 
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 499,000,000 shares in 2023 and 2022; issued 279,653,929 shares in 2023 and 20222,797 2,797 
Paid-in capital7,634,305 7,632,895 
Retained earnings10,751,778 10,502,041 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(193,019)(191,754)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (68,199,625 shares in 2023 and 68,477,429 shares in 2022)4,958,795 4,978,994 
Total common shareholders' equity13,237,066 12,966,985 
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund and noncontrolling interests130,479 97,907 
TOTAL13,367,545 13,064,892 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY$59,717,236 $58,595,191 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

27
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$869,207
 
$364,900
Notes payable and commercial paper 1,352,688
 415,011
Accounts payable 1,105,038
 1,285,577
Customer deposits 403,262
 403,311
Taxes accrued 248,009
 181,114
Interest accrued 181,118
 187,229
Deferred fuel costs 61,867
 102,753
Obligations under capital leases 2,043
 2,423
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 64,904
 76,942
Other 172,735
 180,836
TOTAL 4,460,871
 3,200,096
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 7,538,630
 7,495,290
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 219,892
 227,147
Obligations under capital leases 22,783
 24,582
Other regulatory liabilities 1,595,053
 1,572,929
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities 6,116,010
 5,992,476
Accumulated provisions 471,383
 481,636
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 2,693,751
 3,036,010
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $582,274 as of September 30, 2017 and $661,175 as of December 31, 2016) 13,977,522
 14,467,655
Other 409,125
 1,121,619
TOTAL 33,044,149
 34,419,344
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund 203,185
 203,185
     
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY    
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 254,752,788 shares in 2017 and in 2016 2,548
 2,548
Paid-in capital 5,420,608
 5,417,245
Retained earnings 8,617,901
 8,195,571
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 111,678
 (34,971)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (75,127,186 shares in 2017 and 75,623,363 shares in 2016) 5,462,498
 5,498,584
TOTAL 8,690,237
 8,081,809
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 
$46,398,442
 
$45,904,434
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

Table of Contents


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
(Unaudited)
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Subsidiaries’ Preferred Stock and Noncontrolling InterestsCommon
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossTotal
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2022$97,907 $2,797 ($4,978,994)$7,632,895 $10,502,041 ($191,754)$13,064,892 
Consolidated net income (a)1,364 — — — 310,935 — 312,299 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 2,027 2,027 
Common stock issuances related to stock plans— — 19,599 (15,118)— — 4,481 
Common stock dividends declared— — — — (226,194)— (226,194)
Beneficial interest in storm trust14,577 — — — — — 14,577 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(574)— — — — — (574)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(4,580)— — — — — (4,580)
Balance at March 31, 2023$108,694 $2,797 ($4,959,395)$7,617,777 $10,586,782 ($189,727)$13,166,928 
Consolidated net income (a)770 — — — 391,244 — 392,014 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — — (3,292)(3,292)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans— — 600 16,528 — — 17,128 
Common stock dividends declared— — — — (226,248)— (226,248)
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest25,708 — — — — — 25,708 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(113)— — — — — (113)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(4,580)— — — — — (4,580)
Balance at June 30, 2023$130,479 $2,797 ($4,958,795)$7,634,305 $10,751,778 ($193,019)$13,367,545 
See Notes to Financial Statements.
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for first quarter 2023 and second quarter 2023 each includes $4 million of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented as equity.

28

Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)(Unaudited)
     



Common Shareholders’ Equity

Common Shareholders’ Equity
Subsidiaries’ Preferred Stock 
Common
Stock
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) TotalSubsidiaries' Preferred Stock and Noncontrolling InterestsCommon
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossTotal
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
             
Balance at December 31, 2015
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,552,379) 
$5,403,758
 
$9,393,913
 
$8,951
 
$9,256,791
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$68,110 $2,720 ($5,039,699)$6,766,239 $10,240,552 ($332,528)$11,705,394 
Consolidated net income (a)Consolidated net income (a)3,193 — — — 276,400 — 279,593 
Other comprehensive lossOther comprehensive loss— — — — — (4,050)(4,050)
Common stock issuances related to stock plansCommon stock issuances related to stock plans— — 36,612 (31,085)— — 5,527 
Common stock dividends declaredCommon stock dividends declared— — — — (205,058)— (205,058)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(4,580)— — — — — (4,580)
Balance at March 31, 2022Balance at March 31, 2022$66,723 $2,720 ($5,003,087)$6,735,154 $10,311,894 ($336,578)$11,776,826 
             
Consolidated net income (a)15,586
 
 
 
 1,185,449
 
 1,201,035
Consolidated net income (a)4,308 — — — 159,703 — 164,011 
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 29,185
 29,185
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 12,540 12,540 
Preferred stock repurchases / redemptions
 
 
 
 (283) 
 (283)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 53,684
 229
 
 
 53,913
Common stock issuances related to stock plans— — 18,927 15,214 — — 34,141 
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (455,993) 
 (455,993)Common stock dividends declared— — — — (205,408)— (205,408)
Beneficial interest in storm trustBeneficial interest in storm trust31,636 — — — — — 31,636 
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interestCapital contribution from noncontrolling interest9,595 — — — — — 9,595 
Distributions to noncontrolling interestsDistributions to noncontrolling interests(190)— — — — — (190)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(15,586) 
 
 
 
 
 (15,586)Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(4,580)— — — — — (4,580)
             
Balance at September 30, 2016
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,498,695) 
$5,403,987
 
$10,123,086
 
$38,136
 
$10,069,062
Balance at June 30, 2022Balance at June 30, 2022$107,492 $2,720 ($4,984,160)$6,750,368 $10,266,189 ($324,038)$11,818,571 
             
             
Balance at December 31, 2016
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,498,584) 
$5,417,245
 
$8,195,571
 
($34,971) 
$8,081,809
             
Consolidated net income (a)10,338
 
 
 
 890,726
 
 901,064
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 146,649
 146,649
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 36,086
 3,363
 
 
 39,449
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (468,396) 
 (468,396)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(10,338) 
 
 
 
 
 (10,338)
             
Balance at September 30, 2017
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,462,498) 
$5,420,608
 
$8,617,901
 
$111,678
 
$8,690,237
             
See Notes to Financial Statements.See Notes to Financial Statements.            See Notes to Financial Statements.
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for 2017 and 2016 include $10.3 million and $15.6 million, respectively, of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented within equity.
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for first quarter 2022 and second quarter 2022 each includes $4 million of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented as equity.(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for first quarter 2022 and second quarter 2022 each includes $4 million of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented as equity.




29
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$1,107
 
$1,106
 
$1
 
Commercial 721
 678
 43
 6
Industrial 721
 616
 105
 17
Governmental 62
 58
 4
 7
Total retail 2,611
 2,458
 153
 6
Sales for resale 78
 67
 11
 16
Other 105
 100
 5
 5
Total 
$2,794
 
$2,625
 
$169
 6

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 10,833
 11,817
 (984) (8)
Commercial 8,271
 8,650
 (379) (4)
Industrial 12,503
 12,017
 486
 4
Governmental 682
 703
 (21) (3)
Total retail 32,289
 33,187
 (898) (3)
Sales for resale 3,387
 2,733
 654
 24
Total 35,676
 35,920
 (244) (1)

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating Revenues 
$423
 
$475
 
($52) (11)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh) 8,234
 9,372
 (1,138) (12)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$2,560
 
$2,517
 
$43
 2
Commercial 1,861
 1,759
 102
 6
Industrial 1,937
 1,727
 210
 12
Governmental 172
 161
 11
 7
Total retail 6,530
 6,164
 366
 6
Sales for resale 202
 194
 8
 4
Other 325
 402
 (77) (19)
Total 
$7,057
 
$6,760
 
$297
 4

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 25,810
 27,035
 (1,225) (5)
Commercial 21,595
 21,938
 (343) (2)
Industrial 35,829
 34,581
 1,248
 4
Governmental 1,885
 1,912
 (27) (1)
Total retail 85,119
 85,466
 (347) 
Sales for resale 8,255
 9,452
 (1,197) (13)
Total 93,374
 94,918
 (1,544) (2)

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating revenues 
$1,294
 
$1,342
 
($48) (4)
Billed electric energy sales (GWh) 22,616
 26,484
 (3,868) (15)


Table of Contents

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)


NOTE 1.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions,authorities, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business.  While management is unable to predict with certainty the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report.  Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein.


Vidalia Purchased Power Agreement


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy Louisiana’s Vidalia purchased power agreement.

ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, and the deferral of replacement power costs.

Pilgrim NRC Oversight and Planned Shutdown

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC’s enhanced inspections of Pilgrim and Entergy’s planned shutdown of Pilgrim no later than June 1, 2019.


Spent Nuclear Fuel Litigation


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s spent nuclear fuel litigation.


As discussedIn March 2023 the DOE submitted an offer of judgment to resolve claims in the Form 10-K, in April 2016fourth round ANO damages case. The $41 million offer was accepted by Entergy Arkansas, and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a partial judgment in thethat amount of $42 million in favor of Entergy LouisianaArkansas and against the DOE in the first round River Bend damages case, reserving the issue of cask loading costs pending resolution of the appeal on the same issues in theDOE. Entergy Arkansas and System Energy cases. Entergy Louisiana received payment from the U.S. Treasury in August 2016. In September 2016April 2023. The effects of recording the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a further judgment in the River Bend case in the amount of $5 million. Entergy Louisiana received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.were reductions to plant, nuclear fuel expense, other operation and maintenance expense, materials and supplies, and taxes other than income taxes. The River BendANO damages awarded included $2$18 million related to costs previously recorded as nuclear fuel expense and $3plant, $10 million related to costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in the Entergy Nuclear Palisades case in the amount of $14 million, including $11expense, $8 million related to costs previously capitalized andrecorded as nuclear fuel expense, $3 million related to costs previously recorded as other operationmaterials and maintenance expense. Entergy Nuclear Palisades recorded a receivable for that amount, and subsequently received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in the second round Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 case in the amount of $34 million, including $14 million related to costs previously capitalized, $15 million related to costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense,

30

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

$3 million related to previously recorded decommissioning expense,supplies, and $2 million related to costs previously recorded as taxes other than income taxes.

In July 2023 the DOE submitted an offer of judgment to resolve claims in the Indian Point Unit 2 fourth round and Unit 3 third round combined damages case. The $59 million offer was accepted by Entergy and Holtec International, as the current owner. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a final judgment in that amount in favor of Holtec Indian Point 2, LLC and Holtec Indian Point 3, LLC (previously Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, recorded a receivable for that amount,LLC and subsequentlyEntergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC) and against the DOE. Holtec received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.July 2023. Consistent with certain terms agreed upon in connection with the sale of Indian Point Energy Center in May 2021, Holtec transferred $40 million to Entergy for its pro-rata share of the litigation proceeds in August 2023. The remainder of the judgment was retained by Holtec.



30

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Nuclear Insurance


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.

ConventionalNon-Nuclear Property Insurance


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.


Employment and Labor-related Proceedings


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s employment and labor-related proceedings.


Asbestos Litigation(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation.



Grand Gulf - Related Agreements

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding Grand Gulf-related agreements.

Nelson Industrial Steam Company

Entergy Louisiana is a partner in the Nelson Industrial Steam Company (NISCO) partnership which owns two petroleum coke generating units. In April 2023 these generating units suspended operations in the MISO market, and Entergy Louisiana currently is working with the partners to wind up the NISCO partnership, which will ultimately result in ownership of the generating units transferring to Entergy Louisiana. In May 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the FERC for transaction authorization pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. In June 2023 the LPSC filed a notice to intervene in the proceeding. Entergy Louisiana is evaluating the effect of the transaction on its results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, but at this time does not expect the effect to be material.


NOTE 2.  RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities


See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries.  The following are updates to that discussion.


Regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

System Energy

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in a filing made with the FERC in March 2018, System Energy proposed revisions to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to reflect the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In July 2020 the presiding ALJ in the proceeding issued an initial decision finding that there is an additional $147 million in

31

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes related to System Energy’s uncertain decommissioning tax deduction. In December 2022 the FERC issued an order addressing the ALJ’s initial decision and denying System Energy’s motion to vacate the initial decision. The FERC disagreed with the ALJ’s determination that $147 million should be credited to customers in the same manner as the excess accumulated deferred income taxes addressed in System Energy’s March 2018 filing, which had included a stated amount of excess accumulated deferred income taxes to be returned pursuant to a specified methodology and had not included any excess accumulated deferred income taxes associated with the decommissioning tax position.Instead, the FERC ordered System Energy to compute the amount of excess accumulated deferred income taxes associated with the decommissioning tax position with consideration for the resolution of the tax position by the IRS. In February 2023, System Energy made the required filing with the FERC.In June 2023 the FERC issued a deficiency letter requesting additional information about the IRS’s resolution of the tax position for 2016 and 2017.In July 2023, System Energy provided the additional information.

Fuel and purchased power cost recovery


Entergy Arkansas


Energy Cost Recovery Rider


In March 2017,2023, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the rate from $0.01164$0.01639 per kWh to $0.01547$0.01883 per kWh. The primary reason for the rate increase is a large under-recovered balance as a result of higher natural gas prices in 2022 and a $32 million deferral related to the 2021 February winter storms consistent with APSC staffgeneral staff’s request in 2022. The under-recovered balance included in the filing was partially offset by the proceeds of the $41.7 million refund that System Energy made to Entergy Arkansas in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed testimony in March 2017 recommending thatwith the FERC. The redetermined rate should be implementedof $0.01883 per kWh became effective with the first billing cycle ofin April 2017 under2023 through the normal operation of the tariff. Accordingly, the redetermined rate went into effect on March 31, 2017 pursuantSee Note 2 to the tariff. In July 2017 the Arkansas Attorney General requested additional information to support certain of the costs included in Entergy Arkansas’s 2017 energy cost rate redetermination.

Entergy Louisiana

As discussedfinancial statements in the Form 10-K for information on the 2021 February winter storm investigation proceeding.

Entergy Mississippi

In June 2023 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation agreement between Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff for Entergy Mississippi’s 2023 formula rate plan filing. The stipulation directed Entergy Mississippi to make a compliance filing to revise its power management cost adjustment factor, to revise its grid modernization cost adjustment factor, and to include a revision to reduce the net energy cost factor to a level necessary to reflect an average natural gas price of $4.50 per MMBtu. The MPSC approved the compliance filing in June 20162023, effective for July 2023 bills. See “Retail Rate Proceedings - Filings with the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings and purchased gas adjustment clause filings. The audit included a reviewMPSC (Entergy Mississippi) - Retail Rates - 2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing” below for further discussion of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause for2023 formula rate plan filing and the period from 2014 throughjoint stipulation agreement.

31

Entergy Corporation and SubsidiariesTexas
Notes to Financial Statements

2015 and charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause for the period from 2012 through 2015. Discovery commenced in March 2017.


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2010 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit included a review of the reasonableness of the charges flowed through the fuel adjustment clause by Entergy Louisiana for the period from 2005 through 2009. In December 2016 the LPSC opened a new docket in order to resolve an issue regarding the proper methodology for the recovery of nuclear dry fuel storage costs. In October 2017 the LPSC approved the continued recovery of the nuclear dry fuel storage costs through the fuel adjustment clause, resolving the open issue in the audit.

Entergy Mississippi

Mississippi Attorney General Complaint

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The complaint is wide ranging and relates to tariffs and procedures under which Entergy Mississippi purchases power not generated in Mississippi to meet electricity demand. The defendants have denied the allegations. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery is currently in progress.

Entergy Texas

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016,September 2022, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the period from April 1, 20132019 through March 31, 2016. In December 2016,2022. During the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas entered into a stipulationincurred approximately $1.7 billion in eligible fuel and settlement agreement resulting in a $6 million disallowance not associated with any particular issue raisedpurchased power expenses, net of certain revenues credited to such expenses and a refundother adjustments. As of the over-recoveryend of the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas’s cumulative under-recovery balance of $21was approximately $103.1 million, including interest, which Entergy Texas requested authority to carry over as of November 30, 2016, to most customersthe beginning balance for the subsequent reconciliation period beginning April 2017 through June 2017. The fuel reconciliation settlement was2022, pending future surcharges or refunds as approved by the PUCT. In November 2022 the PUCT referred the proceeding to the State Office of Administrative Hearings. In March 2023 municipal intervenors filed testimony proposing a $5.2 million disallowance for fuel purchased during

32

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Winter Storm Uri. The PUCT staff proposed no disallowance. Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony in March 2017April 2023. In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed, and the refunds were made.

ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted, a joint motion to abate the proceeding to give parties additional time to finalize a settlement and cancelling the hearing on the merits previously scheduled for May 2023. In June 2017,July 2023, Entergy Texas filed an application for aunopposed settlement, supporting testimony, and an agreed motion to admit evidence and remand the proceeding to the PUCT. Pursuant to the unopposed settlement, Entergy Texas would receive no disallowance of fuel refundcosts incurred over the three-year reconciliation period and retain $9.3 million in margins from off-system sales made during the reconciliation period. In July 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of approximately $30.7 million forAdministrative Hearings granted the months of December 2016 through April 2017. For most customers,motion to admit evidence and remanded the refunds flowed through bills for the months of July 2017 through September 2017. The fuel refund was approved byproceeding to the PUCT for consideration of the unopposed settlement. A PUCT decision is expected in August 2017.September 2023.


Entergy Mississippi

In June 2023 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation agreement between Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff for Entergy Mississippi’s 2023 formula rate plan filing. The stipulation directed Entergy Mississippi to make a compliance filing to revise its power management cost adjustment factor, to revise its grid modernization cost adjustment factor, and to include a revision to reduce the net energy cost factor to a level necessary to reflect an average natural gas price of $4.50 per MMBtu. The MPSC approved the compliance filing in June 2023, effective for July 2023 bills. See “Retail Rate Proceedings

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailed information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies.  The following are updates to that information.

- Filings with the APSC

2016MPSC (Entergy Mississippi) - Retail Rates - 2023 Formula Rate Plan FilingFiling” below for further discussion of the 2023 formula rate plan filing and the joint stipulation agreement.

Entergy Texas

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2022, Entergy Arkansas is requiredTexas filed an application with the PUCT to make a supplemental filing supportingreconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the recoveryperiod from April 2019 through March 2022. During the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas incurred approximately $1.7 billion in eligible fuel and purchased power expenses, net of certain nuclear costs. In April 2017,revenues credited to such expenses and other adjustments. As of the end of the reconciliation period, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion consentedTexas’s cumulative under-recovery balance was approximately $103.1 million, including interest, which Entergy Texas requested authority to by all parties requesting that it be permitted to submit its supplemental filing in conjunction with its 2017 formula rate plan filing, which was subsequently made in July 2017 and is discussed below. In May 2017carry over as the APSC approved the joint motion and proposal to review Entergy Arkansas’s supplemental filing on a concurrent schedule with the 2017 formula rate plan filing. In doing so, however, the APSC noted that a determination of whether the supplemental information supporting certain nuclear expenditures will be considered in the hearingbeginning balance for the 2017 formula rate plan filingsubsequent reconciliation period beginning April 2022, pending future surcharges or a separate hearing will be made at a later time.refunds as approved by the PUCT. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas andNovember 2022 the partiesPUCT referred the proceeding to the proceedingState Office of Administrative Hearings. In March 2023 municipal intervenors filed testimony proposing a joint motion to

$5.2 million disallowance for fuel purchased during

32

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

approve a unanimous settlement agreement resolving all issuesWinter Storm Uri. The PUCT staff proposed no disallowance. Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony in April 2023. In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed, and the docket and providing for recovery of the 2017 and 2018 nuclear costs.

2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In July 2017, Entergy Arkansas filedALJ with the APSC its 2017 formula rate plan filing showing Entergy Arkansas’s projected earned return on common equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 test period to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth.  The filing projected a $129.7 million revenue requirement increase to achieve Entergy Arkansas’s target earned return on common equityState Office of 9.75%.  Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan is subject to a four percent annual revenue constraint and the projected annual revenue requirement increase exceeds the four percent, resulting in a proposed increase for the 2017 formula rate plan of $70.9 million. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC revised formula rate plan attachments that projected a $126.2 million revenue requirement increase based on acceptance of certain adjustments and recommendations made by the APSC staff and other intervenors. The revised formula rate plan filing included a proposed $71.1 million revenue requirement increase based on a revision to the four percent cap calculation. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties to the proceeding filedAdministrative Hearings granted, a joint motion to approve a unanimous settlement agreement resolving all issues in the docket and providing for recovery of the 2017 and 2018 nuclear costs. The settlement agreement does not affect Entergy Arkansas’s proposed $71.1 million revenue requirement increase. If a final order is not issued by December 13, 2017, the proposed formula rate plan adjustment will become effective January 2, 2018, subject to refund.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016, Entergy Arkansas filed an application seeking a finding from the APSC that Entergy Arkansas’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In June 2017 the APSC staff and Arkansas Attorney General filed direct testimony. The APSC staff generally supported Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment conditioned on various recommendations. The Arkansas Attorney General’s consultant primarily recommended denial of Entergy Arkansas’s application but alternatively suggested recommendations in the event the APSC approves Entergy Arkansas’s proposal. Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony in June 2017, substantially accepting the APSC staff’s recommendations. In August 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties toabate the proceeding filed a joint motion to approve a unanimous settlement agreement. Also in August 2017 supplemental testimony was filed andgive parties additional time to finalize a settlement and cancelling the hearing was held.on the merits previously scheduled for May 2023. In October 2017 the APSC issued an order finding thatJuly 2023, Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment is in the public interest and approving the settlement agreement subject to a minor modification. Entergy Arkansas expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset to be amortized over 15 years.

Filings with the LPSC

Retail Rates - Electric

2014 Formula Rate Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2015, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s and Entergy Louisiana’s 2014 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy LouisianaTexas filed an unopposed joint reportsettlement, supporting testimony, and an agreed motion to admit evidence and remand the proceeding to the PUCT. Pursuant to the unopposed settlement, Entergy Texas would receive no disallowance of proceedings, which was accepted byfuel costs incurred over the LPSCthree-year reconciliation period and retain $9.3 million in June 2017, finalizingmargins from off-system sales made during the resultsreconciliation period. In July 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of thisAdministrative Hearings granted the motion to admit evidence and remanded the proceeding with no changes to rates already implemented.

2015 Formula Rate Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation reportPUCT for its 2015 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the resultsconsideration of the May 2016 evaluation report, interim updates, and corresponding proceedings with no changes to rates already implemented.

33

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC a request to extend the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider provision of its formula rate plan. In March 2017 the LPSC staff submitted direct testimony generally supportive of a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism and the intervenor in the proceeding did not oppose an extension for this period of time. In June 2017 an uncontested joint stipulation authorizing a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider was filed and the LPSC approved the stipulation in July 2017.

2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2016 calendar year operations. The evaluation report reflects an earned return on common equity of 9.84%. As such, no adjustment to base formula rate plan revenue is required. The following adjustments, however, are required under the formula rate plan. The 2016 formula rate plan evaluation report shows a decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately $16.9 million, comprised of a decrease in legacy Entergy Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $3.5 million, a decrease in legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $9.7 million, and a decrease in incremental formula rate plan revenue of $3.7 million. Additionally, the formula rate plan evaluation report calls for a decrease of $40.5 million in the MISO cost recovery revenue requirement from the current level of $46.8 million to $6.3 million. Rates reflecting these adjustments were implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund, pending the review proceedings. Parties have intervened in the proceedings. No procedural schedule has been established. In September 2017 the LPSC issued its report indicating that no changes to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report are required but reserved for several issues, including Entergy Louisiana’s September 2017 update to its formula rate plan evaluation report.

Formula Rate Plan Extension Request

In August 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed a request with the LPSC seeking to extend its formula rate plan for three years (2017-2019) with limited modifications of its terms.  Those modifications include: a one-time resetting of base rates to the midpoint of the band at Entergy Louisiana’s authorized return on equity of 9.95% for the 2017 test year; narrowing of the formula rate plan bandwidth from a total of 160 basis points to 80 basis points; and a forward-looking mechanism that would allow Entergy Louisiana to recover certain transmission-related costs contemporaneously with when those projects begin delivering benefits to customers.  Entergy Louisiana has requested that the LPSC consider its request on an expedited basis and render a decision by December 2017, in an effort to maintain Entergy Louisiana’s current cycle for implementing rate adjustments, i.e., September 2018, without the need for filing a full base rate case proceeding.

Waterford 3 Replacement Steam Generator Project

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project prudence review proceeding. The refund to customers of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC was made in January 2017. Following a review by the parties, an unopposed joint report of proceedings was filed by the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana in May 2017. In May 2017 the LPSC accepted the joint report of proceedings resolving the matter.

Deactivation or Retirement Decisions for Entergy Louisiana Plants

As a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1.  In January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. Parties have requested further proceedings on the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues

34

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three-year term permitted by MISO.  An evidentiary hearing was held in August 2017 and post-hearing briefs were submitted in October 2017.settlement. A PUCT decision is expected in 2018.September 2023.


Retail Rates - Gas

2016 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

In January 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2016. The filing of the evaluation report for test year 2016 reflected an earned return on common equity of 6.37%. As part of the original filing, pursuant to the extraordinary cost provision of the rate stabilization plan, Entergy Louisiana sought to recover approximately $1.5 million in deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016. Entergy Louisiana requested to recover the prudently incurred August 2016 storm restoration costs over ten years, outside of the rate stabilization plan sharing provisions. As a result, Entergy Louisiana’s filing sought an annual increase in revenue of $1.4 million. Following review of the filing, except for the proposed extraordinary cost recovery, the LPSC staff confirmed Entergy Louisiana’s filing was consistent with the principles and requirements of the rate stabilization plan. The extraordinary cost recovery request associated with the 2016 flood-related deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred for gas operations was removed from the rate stabilization plan pending LPSC consideration in a separate docket. In April 2017 the LPSC approved a joint report of proceedings and Entergy Louisiana submitted a revised evaluation report reflecting a $1.2 million annual increase in revenue with rates implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2017.

In connection with the joint report of proceedings accepted by the LPSC, in May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application to initiate a separate proceeding to recover the deferred operation and maintenance expenses of $1.4 million incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016 through the extraordinary cost provision of the gas rate stabilization plan. The LPSC staff submitted its direct testimony in the proceeding recommending recovery of $0.9 million. The procedural schedule includes a hearing in February 2018.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application seeking a finding from the LPSC that Entergy Louisiana’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. The parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of Entergy Louisiana’s proposed AMI system, with modifications to the proposed customer charge. The stipulation also confirmed that Entergy Louisiana shall continue to include in rate base the remaining book value of the existing electric meters and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. In July 2017 the LPSC approved the stipulation.

Filings with the MPSC

Formula Rate Plan

In March 2017, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth, resulting in no change in rates. In June 2017, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for both the 2016 look-back filing and 2017 test year were within the respective formula rate plan bandwidths. In June 2017 the MPSC approved the stipulation, which resulted in no change in rates.


35

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Mississippi filed an application seeking a finding from the MPSC that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In May 2017 the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi entered into and filed a joint stipulation supporting Entergy Mississippi’s filing, and the MPSC issued an order approving the filing without any material changes, finding that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interest and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The MPSC order also confirmed that Entergy Mississippi shall continue to include in rate base the remaining book value of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates.

Filings with the City Council

Retail Rates

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a proposed implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through March 2020. As part of the proposal, Entergy New Orleans requested that the City Council identify its desired level of funding for the program during this time period and approve a cost recovery mechanism. In April 2017 the City Council approved an implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through December 2019. The City Council directed that the $11.8 million balance reported for Energy Smart funds be used to continue funding the program for Entergy New Orleans’s legacy customers and that the Energy Smart Algiers program continue to be funded through the Algiers fuel adjustment clause, until additional customer funding is required for the legacy customers. In September 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a supplemental plan and proposed several options for an interim cost recovery mechanism necessary to recover program costs during the period between when existing funds directed to Energy Smart programs are depleted (estimated to be June 2018) and when new rates from the anticipated 2018 combined rate case, which will include a cost recovery mechanism for Energy Smart funding, take effect (estimated to be August 2019).  Entergy New Orleans requested that the City Council approve a cost recovery mechanism prior to June 2018.

Internal Restructuring
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy New Orleans to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. In May 2017 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the proposed internal restructuring pursuant to an agreement in principle with the City Council advisors and certain intervenors. Pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will credit retail customers $10 million in 2017, $1.4 million in the first quarter of the year after the transaction closes, and $117,500 each month in the second year after the transaction closes until such time as new base rates go into effect as a result of the anticipated 2018 base rate case. Entergy New Orleans began crediting retail customers in June 2017. In June 2017 the FERC approved the transaction and, pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will provide additional credits to retail customers of $5 million in each of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Entergy New Orleans expects to complete the internal restructuring in fourth quarter 2017.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application seeking a finding from the City Council that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In April 2017, Entergy New Orleans received intervenor testimony that was generally supportive of AMI deployment. The City Council’s advisors filed testimony in May 2017 recommending the adoption of AMI subject to certain modifications, including the denial of Entergy New Orleans’s proposed customer charge as a cost recovery mechanism. In June 2017 the procedural schedule was suspended to allow for settlement discussions. A

36

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

status conference was held in October 2017, and the parties set another status conference for February 2018 with the intent to continue to pursue settlement in the interim.
Filings with the PUCT

Retail Rates

2011 Rate Case

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of Entergy Texas’s 2011 rate case. As discussed in the Form 10-K, several parties, including Entergy Texas, appealed various aspects of the PUCT’s order to the Travis County District Court. In October 2014 the Travis County District Court issued an order upholding the PUCT’s decision except as to the line-loss factor issue referenced in the Form 10-K, which was found in favor of Entergy Texas. In November 2014, Entergy Texas and other parties, including the PUCT, appealed the Travis County District Court decision to the Third Court of Appeals. Oral argument before the court panel was held in September 2015. In April 2016 the Third Court of Appeals issued its opinion affirming the District Court’s decision on all points. Entergy Texas and other parties petitioned the Texas Supreme Court to hear its appeal of the Third Court’s ruling. In September 2017 the Texas Supreme Court denied the petitions for review. Entergy Texas filed a motion for rehearing of the Texas Supreme Court’s denial of the petition for review. That motion is pending.

Other Filings

In September 2016, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to amend its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) rider. The proposed amended TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $29.5 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers. This amount includes the approximately $10.5 million annually that Entergy Texas is currently authorized to collect through the TCRF rider. In December 2016, Entergy Texas and the PUCT reached a settlement agreeing to the amended TCRF annual revenue requirement of $29.5 million. The PUCT approved the settlement and issued a final order in March 2017. Entergy Texas implemented the amended TCRF rider beginning with bills covering usage on and after March 20, 2017.

In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application to amend its distribution cost recovery factor (DCRF) rider by increasing the total collection from $8.65 million to approximately $19 million. In July 2017, Entergy Texas, the PUCT, and the parties in the proceeding entered into an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in an amended DCRF annual revenue requirement of $18.3 million, with the resulting rates effective for usage no later than October 1, 2017. In September 2017 the PUCT issued its final order approving the unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. The amended DCRF rider rates became effective for usage on and after September 1, 2017.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

In April 2017 the Texas legislature enacted legislation that extends statutory support for AMI deployment to Entergy Texas and directs that if Entergy Texas elects to deploy AMI, it shall do so as rapidly as practicable. In July 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking an order from the PUCT approving Entergy Texas’s deployment of AMI. Entergy Texas proposed to replace existing meters with advanced meters that enable two-way data communication; design and build a secure and reliable network to support such communications; and implement support systems. AMI is intended to serve as the foundation of Entergy Texas’s modernized power grid. The filing identified a number of quantified and unquantified benefits, with Entergy Texas showing that its AMI deployment is expected to produce nominal net operational cost savings to customers of $33 million. Entergy Texas also sought to continue to include in rate base the remaining book value, approximately $41 million at December 31, 2016, of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. Entergy Texas proposed a seven-year depreciable life for the new advanced meters, the three-year deployment of which is expected to begin in 2019. Entergy Texas also proposed a surcharge tariff to recover the reasonable and necessary costs it has and will incur under the deployment plan for the full deployment of advanced meters. Further, Entergy

37

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Texas is seeking approval of fees that would be charged to customers who choose to opt out of receiving service through an advanced meter and instead receive electric service with a non-standard meter. Subject to approval by the PUCT, deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in 2018. In October 2017, Entergy Texas and other parties entered into and filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. PUCT action on the stipulation and settlement agreement remains pending. Entergy Texas expects a decision from the PUCT by December 2017.

Storm Cost Recovery

Entergy Mississippi


In June 2023 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation agreement between Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff for Entergy Mississippi’s 2023 formula rate plan filing. The stipulation directed Entergy Mississippi to make a compliance filing to revise its power management cost adjustment factor, to revise its grid modernization cost adjustment factor, and to include a revision to reduce the net energy cost factor to a level necessary to reflect an average natural gas price of $4.50 per MMBtu. The MPSC approved the compliance filing in June 2023, effective for July 2023 bills. See “Retail Rate Proceedings - Filings with the MPSC (Entergy Mississippi) - Retail Rates - 2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing” below for further discussion of the 2023 formula rate plan filing and the joint stipulation agreement.

Entergy Texas

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2022, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the period from April 2019 through March 2022. During the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas incurred approximately $1.7 billion in eligible fuel and purchased power expenses, net of certain revenues credited to such expenses and other adjustments. As of the end of the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas’s cumulative under-recovery balance was approximately $103.1 million, including interest, which Entergy Texas requested authority to carry over as the beginning balance for the subsequent reconciliation period beginning April 2022, pending future surcharges or refunds as approved by the PUCT. In November 2022 the PUCT referred the proceeding to the State Office of Administrative Hearings. In March 2023 municipal intervenors filed testimony proposing a $5.2 million disallowance for fuel purchased during

32

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Winter Storm Uri. The PUCT staff proposed no disallowance. Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony in April 2023. In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed, and the ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted, a joint motion to abate the proceeding to give parties additional time to finalize a settlement and cancelling the hearing on the merits previously scheduled for May 2023. In July 2023, Entergy Texas filed an unopposed settlement, supporting testimony, and an agreed motion to admit evidence and remand the proceeding to the PUCT. Pursuant to the unopposed settlement, Entergy Texas would receive no disallowance of fuel costs incurred over the three-year reconciliation period and retain $9.3 million in margins from off-system sales made during the reconciliation period. In July 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted the motion to admit evidence and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for consideration of the unopposed settlement. A PUCT decision is expected in September 2023.

Retail Rate Proceedings

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies. The following are updates to that discussion.

Filings with the APSC (Entergy Arkansas)

Retail Rates

2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In July 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 2023 formula rate plan filing to set its formula rate for the 2024 calendar year. The filing contained an evaluation of Entergy Arkansas’s earnings for the projected year 2024 and a netting adjustment for the historical year 2022. The filing showed that Entergy Arkansas’s earned rate of return on common equity for the 2024 projected year is 8.11% resulting in a revenue deficiency of $80.5 million. The earned rate of return on common equity for the 2022 historical year was 7.29% resulting in a $49.8 million netting adjustment. The total proposed revenue change for the 2024 projected year and 2022 historical year netting adjustment is $130.3 million. By operation of the formula rate plan, Entergy Arkansas’s recovery of the revenue requirement is subject to a four percent annual revenue constraint. Because Entergy Arkansas’s revenue requirement in this filing exceeded the constraint, the resulting increase is limited to $88.6 million.

COVID-19 Orders

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of APSC orders issued in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. In its 2023 formula rate plan filing, Entergy Arkansas proposed to amortize the COVID-19 regulatory asset over a ten-year period. As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Arkansas had a regulatory asset of $39 million for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Filings with the LPSC (Entergy Louisiana)

2022 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2022 calendar year operations. The 2022 test year evaluation report produced an earned return on common equity of 8.33%, requiring an approximately $70.7 million increase to base rider revenue. Due to a cap for the 2021 and 2022 test years, however, base rider formula rate plan revenues are only being increased by approximately $4.9 million, leaving an ongoing revenue deficiency of approximately $65.9 million and providing for prospective return on common equity opportunity of approximately 8.38%. Other changes in formula rate plan revenue driven by increases in capacity costs, primarily legacy capacity costs, additions eligible for recovery through the transmission recovery mechanism and distribution recovery mechanism, and higher sales during the test period, are offset by reductions in net MISO costs as well as credits for FERC-ordered refunds. Also included in the 2022 test year distribution recovery

33

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
mechanism revenue requirement is a $6 million credit relating to the distribution recovery mechanism performance accountability standards and requirements. In total, the net increase in formula rate plan revenues, including base formula rate plan revenues inside the formula rate plan bandwidth and subject to the cap, as well as other formula rate plan revenues outside of the bandwidth, is $85.2 million.

COVID-19 Orders

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2020 the LPSC issued an order authorizing utilities to record as a regulatory asset expenses incurred from the suspension of disconnections and collection of late fees imposed by LPSC orders associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application proposing to utilize approximately $1.6 billion in certain low interest debt to generate earnings to apply toward the reduction of the COVID-19 regulatory asset, as well as to conduct additional outside right-of-way vegetation management activities and to apply to the minor storm reserve account. In that filing, Entergy Louisiana proposed to delay repayment of certain shorter-term first mortgage bonds that were issued to finance storm restoration costs until the costs could be securitized and to invest the funds that otherwise would be used to repay those bonds in the money pool to take advantage of the spread between prevailing interest rates on investments in the money pool and the interest rates on the bonds. The LPSC approved Entergy Louisiana’s requested relief in June 2023 and a subsequent filing will be required to permit the LPSC to review the COVID-19 regulatory asset. As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Louisiana had a regulatory asset of $47.8 million for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Filings with the MPSC (Entergy Mississippi)

Retail Rates

2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In March 2023, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2023 test year filing and 2022 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s storm damage provision. As of July 31, 2017,earned return on rate base for the balance inhistorical 2022 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth and projected earned return for the 2023 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2023 test year filing shows a $39.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s accumulated storm damage provision was less than $10earned return on rate base to the specified point of adjustment of 6.67%, within the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2022 look-back filing compares actual 2022 results to the approved benchmark return on rate base and reflects the need for a $19.8 million thereforetemporary increase in formula rate plan revenues, including the refund of a $1.3 million over-recovery resulting from the demand-side management costs true-up for 2022. In fourth quarter 2022, Entergy Mississippi resumed billingrecorded a regulatory asset of $18.2 million in connection with the monthly storm damage provisionlook-back feature of the formula rate plan to reflect that the 2022 estimated earned return was below the formula rate plan bandwidth. In accordance with the provisions of the formula rate plan, Entergy Mississippi implemented a $27.9 million interim rate increase, reflecting a cap equal to 2% of 2022 retail revenues, effective in April 2023.

In May 2023, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a joint stipulation that confirmed a 2023 test year filing resulting in a total revenue increase of $26.5 million for 2023. Pursuant to the joint stipulation, Entergy Mississippi’s 2022 look-back filing reflected an earned return on rate base of 6.10% in calendar year 2022, which is below the look-back bandwidth, resulting in a $19.0 million increase in the formula rate plan revenues on an interim basis through June 2024. Entergy Mississippi recorded a regulatory credit of $0.8 million in June 2023 to reflect the increase in the look-back regulatory asset. In addition, certain long-term service agreement and conductor handling costs were authorized for realignment from the formula rate plan to the annual power management and grid modernization riders effective January 2023, resulting in regulatory credits recorded in June 2023 of $4.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Also, the amortization of Entergy Mississippi’s COVID-19 bad debt deferral was suspended for calendar year 2023 and will resume in 2024. In June 2023 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation with rates effective in July 2023.


34

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Filings with the City Council (Entergy New Orleans)

Retail Rates

2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In April 2023, Entergy New Orleans submitted to the City Council its formula rate plan 2022 test year filing. The 2022 test year evaluation report produced an electric earned return on equity of 7.34% and a gas earned return on equity of 3.52% compared to the authorized return on equity for each of 9.35%. Entergy New Orleans seeks approval of a $25.6 million rate increase based on the formula set by the City Council in the 2018 rate case. The formula results in an increase in authorized electric revenues of $17.4 million and an increase in authorized gas revenues of $8.2 million. Entergy New Orleans also seeks to commence collecting $3.4 million in electric revenues that were previously approved by the City Council for collection through the formula rate plan. The filing was subject to review by the City Council and other parties over a 75-day review period. In July 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed a report to decrease its requested formula rate plan revenues by approximately $0.5 million to account for minor errors discovered after the filing. The City Council advisors issued a report seeking a reduction in requested formula rate plan revenues of approximately $8.3 million, combined for electric and gas, due to alleged errors. The City Council advisors proposed additional rate mitigation in the amount of $12 million through offsets to the formula rate plan rate increase by certain regulatory liabilities. The parties have until August 9, 2023 to reach an agreement on the final amount of the formula rate plan revenue increase. If no agreement is reached, Entergy New Orleans has the right to implement its requested rate subject to final resolution through a subsequent litigated proceeding. Resulting rates will be effective with the first billing cycle of September 2017 bills.2023 pursuant to the formula rate plan tariff. For any disputed rate adjustments, however, the City Council would set a procedural schedule that would extend the process for City Council approval of disputed rate adjustments.


System AgreementFilings with the PUCT and Texas Cities (Entergy Texas)

Retail Rates

2022 Base Rate Case

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2022, Entergy Texas filed a base rate case with the PUCT seeking a net increase in base rates of approximately $131.4 million. The base rate case was based on a 12-month test year ending December 31, 2021. Key drivers of the requested increase were changes in depreciation rates as the result of a depreciation study and an increase in the return on equity. In addition, Entergy Texas included capital additions placed into service for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2021, including those additions reflected in the then-effective distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider, all of which have been reset to zero as a result of this proceeding.

In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed on behalf of the parties an unopposed settlement resolving all issues in the proceeding, except for issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and Entergy Texas filed an agreed motion for interim rates, subject to refund or surcharge to the extent that the interim rates differ from the final approved rates. The unopposed settlement reflected a base rate increase to be effective and relate back to December 2022 of $54 million, exclusive of, and incremental to, the costs being realigned from the distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider and $4.8 million of rate case expenses to be recovered through a rider over a period of 36 months. The base rate increase of $54 million includes updated depreciation rates and a total annual revenue requirement of $14.5 million for the accrual of a self-insured storm reserve and the recovery of the regulatory assets for the pension and postretirement benefits expense deferral, costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and retired non-advanced metering system electric meters. In May 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted the motion for interim rates, which became effective in June 2023. Additionally, the ALJ remanded the proceeding, except for the issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, to the PUCT to consider the settlement. In June 2023 the ALJ issued a proposal for

35

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
decision related to the electric vehicle charging infrastructure issues and which noted recent legislation enacted which permits electric utilities to own and operate such infrastructure. The ALJ’s proposal for decision deferred to the PUCT regarding whether it is appropriate for any vertically integrated electric utility, or Entergy Texas specifically, to own electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and in the event that the PUCT decided ownership is permissible, the ALJ recommended approval of the proposed tariff to charge host customers for utility-owned and operated electric vehicle charging infrastructure sited on customer premises and denial of the proposed tariff to temporarily adjust billing demand charges for separately metered electric vehicle charging infrastructure, citing cost-shifting concerns. In July 2023 the parties filed exceptions and replies to exceptions to the proposal for decision. At its August 3, 2023 open meeting, the PUCT voted to issue a final order approving the unopposed settlement and to consider the issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure addressed in the ALJ’s proposal for decision in a separate future proceeding.

Generation Cost Equalization ProceedingsRecovery Rider


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2022 the PUCT approved a unanimous settlement agreement adjusting Entergy Texas’s generation cost recovery rider to recover an annual revenue requirement of approximately $92.8 million related to Entergy Texas’s actual investment in the acquisition of the Hardin County Peaking Facility, and rates became effective. In September 2022, Entergy Texas filed a relate-back rider designed to collect over three months an additional approximately $5.7 million, which is the revenue requirement, plus carrying costs, associated with Entergy Texas’s acquisition of Hardin County Peaking Facility from June 2021 through August 2022 when the updated revenue requirement took effect. In April 2023 the PUCT approved Entergy Texas’s as-filed request with rates effective over three months beginning in May 2023.

COVID-19 Orders

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2020 the PUCT authorized electric utilities to record as a regulatory asset expenses resulting from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In future proceedings, the PUCT will consider whether each utility's request for recovery of these regulatory assets is reasonable and necessary, the appropriate period of recovery, and any amount of carrying costs thereon. As part of its 2022 base rate case filing, Entergy Texas requested recovery of its regulatory asset over a three-year period beginning December 2022. The base rate increase of $54 million in the unopposed settlement filed in the base rate case proceeding in May 2023, which is awaiting PUCT approval, includes an annual revenue requirement of $3.4 million related to recovery of the regulatory asset for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Entergy Texas began recovery of the regulatory asset with the interim increase in the annual base rate effective in June 2023.

Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceeding

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceedings regarding the System Agreement, including the LPSC’s petition for review of the FERC’s October 2011 and February 2014 orders with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In August 2017 the D.C. Circuit issued a decision addressing the LPSC’s appeal of the FERC’s October 2011 and February 2014 orders. On the issue of the FERC’s implementation of the prospective remedy as of June 2005 and whether the bandwidth remedy should be extended for an additional 17 months in years 2004-2005, the D.C. Circuit affirmed the FERC’s implementation of the remedy and denied the LPSC’s appeal. On the issue of whether the operating companies should be required to issue refunds for the 20-month period from September 2001 to May 2003, the D.C. Circuit granted the FERC’s request for agency reconsideration and remanded that issue back to the FERC for further proceedings as requested by all parties to the appeal.

Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceedings

opportunity sales proceeding. As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2009 the LPSCJanuary 2023, Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc., an industrial customer association, filed a complaint requesting thatnotice of appeal of the FERC determine that certainU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas’s order denying its motion to intervene to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and a motion with the district court to stay the proceedings pending the appeal, which was denied. In February 2023, Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District to stay the proceedings pending the appeal, which also was denied. The trial was held in February 2023. Following the trial, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District to expedite the appeal filed by Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. The court granted Entergy Arkansas’s sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violatedrequest, and oral arguments were held in June 2023. An order from the provisions of thecourt is expected in 2023.

Complaints Against System Agreement that allocated the energy generated by Entergy System resources, (b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the provision of the System Agreement that prohibited sales to third parties by individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other Utility operating companies.  The LPSC’s complaint challenges sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds.Energy


In April 2016 the FERC issued orders addressing requests for rehearing filed in July 2012 and an ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The first order denies Entergy’s request for rehearing and affirms FERC’s earlier rulings that Entergy’s original methodology for allocating energy costsSee Note 2 to the opportunity sales was incorrect and, as a result, Entergy Arkansas must make payments to the other Utility operating companies to put themfinancial statements in the same position that they would have been in absentForm 10-K for information regarding pending complaints against System Energy. System Energy and the incorrect allocation. The FERC clarified that interest should be included withUnit Power Sales Agreement are currently the payments. The second order affirmed in part, and reversed in part, the rulings in the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision regarding the methodology that should be used to calculate the payments Entergy Arkansas is to make to the other Utility operating companies. The FERC affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that a full re-runsubject of intra-system bills should be performed, but required that methodology be modified so that the sales have the same priority for purposes of energy allocation as joint account sales. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision that any payments by Entergy Arkansas should be reduced by 20%. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that adjustments to other System Agreement service schedules and excess bandwidth payments should not be taken into account when calculating the payments to be made by Entergy Arkansas. The FERC held that such adjustments and excess bandwidth payments should be taken into account, but ordered further proceedings before an ALJ to address whether a cap on any reduction due to bandwidth payments was necessary and to implement the other adjustments to the calculation methodology.

several
38

36

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In May 2016, Entergy Services filedlitigation proceedings at the FERC, including challenges with respect to System Energy’s authorized return on equity and capital structure, renewal of its sale-leaseback arrangement, treatment of uncertain tax positions, a request for rehearingbroader investigation of rates under the FERC’s April 2016 order arguing that payments made by Entergy Arkansas should be reduced asUnit Power Sales Agreement, and a result ofprudence complaint challenging the timing of the LPSC’s approval of certain contracts. Entergy Services also filed a request for clarification and/or rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The APSCextended power uprate completed at Grand Gulf in 2012 and the LPSC also filed requests for rehearingoperation and management of the FERC’s April 2016 order. In September 2017 the FERC issued an order denying the request for rehearing on the issue of whether any payments by Entergy Arkansas to the other Utility operating companies should be reduced due to the timing of the LPSC’s approval of Entergy Arkansas’s wholesale baseload contract with Entergy Louisiana.

Pursuant to the procedural schedule establishedGrand Gulf, particularly in the case, Entergy Services re-ran intra-system bills2016-2020 time period. The claims in these proceedings include claims for refunds and claims for rate adjustments; the ten-year period 2000-2009aggregate amount of refunds claimed in these proceedings substantially exceeds the net book value of System Energy. In the event of an adverse decision in one or more of these proceedings requiring the payment of substantial additional refunds, System Energy would be required to quantifyseek financing to pay such refunds which may not be available on terms acceptable to System Energy, or may not be available at all, when required. The following are updates to that discussion.

Return on Equity and Capital Structure Complaints

As discussed in the effects of the FERC's ruling. In November 2016 the LPSC submitted testimony disputing certain aspects of the calculations, and Entergy Services submitted answering testimonyForm 10-K, in January 2017. In February 2017March 2021 the FERC staff filed testimony and Entergy Services filed responsive testimony. In March 2017 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing was held in May 2017. In July 2017 the ALJ issued an initial decision concluding that Entergy Arkansas should pay $86 million plus interest toin the other Utility operating companies. In August 2017 the Utility operating companies,proceeding initiated by the LPSC, the MPSC, the APSC, and the City Council against System Energy regarding the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement. With regard to System Energy’s authorized return on equity, the ALJ determined that the existing return on equity of 10.94% is no longer just and reasonable, and that the replacement authorized return on equity, based on application of the Opinion No. 569-A methodology, should be 9.32%. The ALJ further determined that System Energy should pay refunds for a fifteen-month refund period (January 2017-April 2018) based on the difference between the current return on equity and the replacement authorized return on equity. The ALJ determined that the April 2018 complaint concerning the authorized return on equity should be dismissed, and that no refunds for a second fifteen-month refund period should be due. With regard to System Energy’s capital structure, the ALJ determined that System Energy’s actual equity ratio is excessive and that the just and reasonable equity ratio is 48.15% equity, based on the average equity ratio of the proxy group used to evaluate the return on equity for the second complaint. The ALJ further determined that System Energy should pay refunds for a fifteen-month refund period (September 2018-December 2019) based on the difference between the actual equity ratio and the 48.15% equity ratio. If the ALJ’s initial decision is upheld, the estimated refund for this proceeding is approximately $39 million, which includes interest through June 30, 2023, and the estimated resulting annual rate reduction would be approximately $28 million. As a result of the 2022 settlement agreement with the MPSC, both the estimated refund and rate reduction exclude Entergy Mississippi's portion. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement. The estimated refund will continue to accrue interest until a final FERC staffdecision is issued.

The ALJ initial decision is an interim step in the FERC litigation process, and an ALJ’s determinations made in an initial decision are not controlling on the FERC. In April 2021, System Energy filed individual briefsits brief on exceptions, challenging various aspects ofin which it challenged the initial decision. In September 2017decision’s findings on both the Utility operating companies,return on equity and capital structure issues. Also in April 2021 the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, the City Council, and the FERC trial staff filed separatebriefs on exceptions. Reply briefs opposing exceptions takenwere filed in May 2021 by various parties. The case is pending beforeSystem Energy, the FERC. No paymentsFERC trial staff, the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council. Refunds, if any, that might be required will be made or received by the Utility operating companies untilonly become due after the FERC issues anits order reviewing the initial decisiondecision.

Grand Gulf Sale-leaseback Renewal Complaint and Entergy submits a subsequent filing to comply with that order.Uncertain Tax Position Rate Base Issue


The effect of the FERC’s decisions thus farAs discussed in the case would be that Entergy Arkansas will make payments to some or all ofForm 10-K, in May 2018 the other Utility operating companies.  Because further proceedings will still occur in the case, the amount and recipients of payments by Entergy Arkansas are unknown at this time.  Based on testimony previously submitted in the case and its assessment of the April 2016 FERC orders, in the first quarter 2016, Entergy Arkansas recorded a liability of $87 million, which includes interest, for its estimated increased costs and payment to the other Utility operating companies.  This estimate is subject to change depending on how the FERC resolves the issues that are still outstanding in the case, including its review of the July 2017 initial decision.  Entergy Arkansas’s increased costs will be attributed to Entergy Arkansas’s retail and wholesale businesses, and it is not probable that Entergy Arkansas will recover the wholesale portion.  Entergy Arkansas, therefore, recorded a regulatory asset in the first quarter 2016 of approximately $75 million, which represents its estimate of the retail portion of the costs.

Complaint Against System Energy

In January 2017 the APSC and MPSCLPSC filed a complaint withagainst System Energy and Entergy Services related to System Energy’s renewal of a sale-leaseback transaction originally entered into in December 1988 for an 11.5% undivided interest in Grand Gulf Unit 1. The APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council subsequently intervened in the proceeding. A hearing was held before a FERC ALJ in November 2019. In April 2020 the ALJ issued the initial decision, and in December 2022 the FERC against System Energy.issued an order on the ALJ’s initial decision, which affirmed it in part and modified it in part. The complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to whichFERC’s order directed System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacityto calculate refunds on three issues, and energy to provide a compliance report detailing the calculations. The FERC’s order also disallows the future recovery of sale-leaseback renewal costs, which is estimated at approximately $11.5 million annually for purchases from Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equity under the Unit Power Sales Agreement is 10.94%. The complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requests the FERC to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests that the FERC establish January 23, 2017 as a refund effective date. The complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for System Energy is between 8.37% and 8.67%. System Energy answered the complaint in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. The LPSC and the City Council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. In September 2017 the FERC established a refund effective date of January 23, 2017, consolidated the return on equity complaint proceeding with the proceeding related to System Energy’s Unit Power Sales Agreement amendments, discussed below, and directed the parties to engage in settlement proceedings before an ALJ. If the parties fail to come to an agreement during settlement proceedings, a prehearing conference will be held to establish a procedural schedule for hearing proceedings.

through July 2036.
39

37

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The three refund issues are rental expenses related to the renewal of the sale-leaseback arrangements; refunds, if any, for the revenue requirement impact of including accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the decommissioning uncertain tax positions from 2004 through the present; and refunds for the net effect of correcting the depreciation inputs for capital additions attributable to the portion of plant subject to the sale-leaseback.

In January 2023, System Energy filed its compliance report with the FERC. With respect to the sale-leaseback renewal costs, System Energy calculated a refund of $89.8 million, which represented all of the sale-leaseback renewal rental costs that System Energy recovered in rates, with interest. With respect to the decommissioning uncertain tax position issue, System Energy calculated that no additional refunds are owed because it had already provided a one-time historical credit (for the period January 2016 through September 2020) of $25.2 million based on the accumulated deferred income taxes that resulted from the IRS’s partial acceptance of the decommissioning tax position, and because it has been providing an ongoing rate base credit for the accumulated deferred income taxes that resulted from the IRS’s partial acceptance of the decommissioning tax position since October 2020. With respect to the depreciation refund, System Energy calculated a refund of $13.7 million, which is the net total of a refund to customers for excess depreciation expense previously collected, plus interest, offset by the additional return on rate base that System Energy previously did not collect, without interest. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the regulatory charge and corresponding regulatory liability recorded in June 2022 related to these proceedings. In January 2023, System Energy paid the refunds of $103.5 million, which included refunds of $41.7 million to Entergy Arkansas, $27.8 million to Entergy Louisiana, and $34 million to Entergy New Orleans.

In January 2023, System Energy filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s determinations in the December 2022 order on sale-leaseback refund issues and future lease cost disallowances, the FERC’s prospective policy on uncertain tax positions, and the proper accounting of System Energy’s accumulated deferred income taxes adjustment for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017; and a motion for confirmation of its interpretation of the December 2022 order’s remedy concerning the decommissioning tax position. In January 2023 the retail regulators filed a motion for confirmation of their interpretation of the refund requirement in the December 2022 FERC order and a provisional request for rehearing. In February 2023 the FERC issued a notice that the rehearing requests have been deemed denied by operation of law. The deemed denial of the rehearing request initiates the sixty-day period in which aggrieved parties may petition for federal appellate court review of the underlying FERC orders; however, the FERC may issue a substantive order on rehearing as long as it continues to have jurisdiction over the case. In March 2023, System Energy filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit a petition for review of the December 2022 order. In March 2023, System Energy also filed an unopposed motion to stay the proceeding in the Fifth Circuit pending the FERC’s disposition of the pending motions, and the court granted the motion to stay.

In February 2023, System Energy submitted a tariff compliance filing with the FERC to clarify that, consistent with the releases provided in the MPSC settlement, Entergy Mississippi will continue to be charged for its allocation of the sale-leaseback renewal costs under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement. In March 2023 the MPSC filed a protest to System Energy’s tariff compliance filing. The MPSC argues that the settlement did not specifically address post-settlement sale-leaseback renewal costs and that the sale-leaseback renewal costs may not be recovered under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. Entergy Mississippi’s allocated sale-leaseback renewal costs are estimated at $5.7 million annually for the remaining term of the sale-leaseback renewal.

LPSC Additional Complaints

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2020 the LPSC authorized its staff to file additional complaints at the FERC related to the rates charged by System Energy for Grand Gulf energy and capacity supplied to Entergy Louisiana under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The following are updates to that discussion.


38

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Unit Power Sales Agreement Complaint

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the first of the additional complaints was filed by the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council in September 2020. The first complaint raises two sets of rate allegations: violations of the filed rate and a corresponding request for refunds for prior periods; and elements of the Unit Power Sales Agreement are unjust and unreasonable and a corresponding request for refunds for the 15-month refund period and changes to the Unit Power Sales Agreement prospectively. In May 2021 the FERC issued an order addressing the complaint, establishing a refund effective date of September 21, 2020, establishing hearing procedures, and holding those procedures in abeyance pending the FERC’s review of the initial decision in the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint discussed above.

In November 2021 the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council filed direct testimony and requested the FERC to order refunds for prior periods and prospective amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement. System Energy filed answering testimony in January 2022. In March 2022 the FERC trial staff filed direct and answering testimony recommending refunds and prospective modifications to the Unit Power Sales Agreement.

In April 2022, System Energy filed cross-answering testimony in response to the FERC trial staff’s recommendations. In June 2022 the FERC trial staff submitted revised answering testimony, in which it recommended additional refunds associated with the accumulated deferred income tax balances in account 190. Also in June 2022, System Energy filed revised and supplemental cross-answering testimony to respond to the FERC trial staff’s testimony and to oppose its revised recommendation.

In May 2022 the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council filed rebuttal testimony and asserted new claims. In June 2022 a new procedural schedule was adopted, providing for additional rounds of testimony and for the hearing to begin in September 2022. The hearing concluded in December 2022. Also in December 2022, a motion to extend the briefing schedule and the May 2023 deadline for the initial decision was granted.

In November 2022, System Energy filed a partial settlement agreement with the APSC, the City Council, and the LPSC that resolves the following issues raised in the Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint: advance collection of lease payments, aircraft costs, executive incentive compensation, money pool borrowings, advertising expenses, deferred nuclear refueling outage costs, industry association dues, and termination of the capital funds agreement. The settlement provides that System Energy will provide a black-box refund of $18 million (inclusive of interest), plus additional refund amounts with interest to be calculated for certain issues to be distributed to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans as the Utility operating companies other than Entergy Mississippi purchasing under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The settlement further provides that if the APSC, the City Council, or the LPSC agrees to the global settlement System Energy entered into with the MPSC (see “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement), and such global settlement includes a black-box refund amount, then the black-box refund for this settlement agreement shall not be incremental or in addition to the global black-box refund amount. The settlement agreement addresses other matters as well, including adjustments to rate base beginning in October 2022, exclusion of certain other costs, and inclusion of money pool borrowings, if any, in short-term debt within the cost of capital calculation used in the Unit Power Sales Agreement. In April 2023 the FERC approved the settlement agreement. The refund provided for in the settlement agreement was included in the May 2023 service month bills under the Unit Power Sales Agreement.

In May 2023 the presiding ALJ issued an initial decision finding that System Energy should have excluded multiple identified categories of accumulated deferred income taxes from rate base when calculating Unit Power Sales Agreement bills. Based on this finding, the initial decision recommended refunds; System Energy estimates that those refunds for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans would total approximately $115 million plus $142 million of interest through June 30, 2023. The initial decision also finds that the Unit Power Sales Agreement should be modified such that a cash working capital allowance of negative $36.4 million is applied prospectively. If the FERC ultimately orders these modifications to cash working capital be implemented, the estimated annual revenue requirement impact is expected to be immaterial. On the other non-settled issues for

39

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
which the complainants sought refunds or changes to the Unit Power Sales Agreement, the initial decision ruled against the complainants.

The initial decision is an interim step in the FERC litigation process, and an ALJ’s determination made in an initial decision is not controlling on the FERC. System Energy disagrees with the ALJ’s findings concerning the accumulated deferred income taxes issues and cash working capital. In July 2023, System Energy filed a brief on exceptions to the initial decision’s accumulated deferred income taxes findings. Refunds, if any, that might be required will become due only after the FERC issues its order reviewing the initial decision.

Grand Gulf Prudence Complaint

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2021, the second of the additional complaints was filed at the FERC by the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council against System Energy, Entergy Services, Entergy Operations, and Entergy Corporation. In November 2022 the FERC issued an order setting the complaint for settlement and hearing procedures. In February 2023 the FERC issued an order denying rehearing and thereby affirming its order setting the complaint for settlement and hearing procedures. In July 2023 the FERC chief ALJ terminated settlement procedures and appointed a presiding ALJ to oversee hearing procedures. The procedural schedule for the hearing has not yet been established.

Based on analysis of the pending litigation, including the May 2023 initial decision in the Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint proceeding, management determined that System Energy’s regulatory liability related to complaints against System Energy as of June 30, 2023 is adequate.

System Energy Formula Rate Annual Protocols Formal Challenge Concerning 2021 Calendar Year Bills

In March 2023, pursuant to the protocols procedures discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council filed with the FERC a formal challenge to System Energy’s implementation of the formula rate during calendar year 2021. The formal challenge alleges: (1) that it was imprudent for System Energy to accept the IRS’s partial acceptance of a previously uncertain tax position; (2) that System Energy used incorrect inputs for retained earnings that are used to determine the capital structure; (3) that the equity ratio charged in rates was excessive; and (4) that all issues in the ongoing Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint proceeding should also be reflected in calendar year 2021 bills. The first, third, and fourth allegations are identical to issues that were raised in the formal challenge to the calendar year 2020 bills. The formal challenge to the calendar year 2021 bills states that the impact of the first allegation is “tens of millions of dollars,” but it does not provide an estimate of the financial impact of the remaining allegations.

In May 2023, System Energy filed an answer to the formal challenge in which it requested that the FERC deny the formal challenge as a matter of law, or else hold the proceeding in abeyance pending the resolution of related dockets.

Unit Power Sales Agreement


In August 2017,As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in December 2021, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. The filing proposes limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula.expenses. The proposed amendments would result in lowerhigher charges to the Utility operating companies that buy capacity and energy from System Energy under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The proposed changes are based on updated depreciation and nuclear decommissioning studies that take into account the renewal of Grand Gulf’s operating license for a term through November 1, 2044. System Energy requested that the FERC accept the amendments effective October 1, 2017.

In September 2017February 2022 the FERC accepted System Energy’sEntergy’s proposed Unit Power Sales Agreement amendments, subject to further proceedings to consider the justness and reasonablenessincreased depreciation rates with an effective date of the amendments. Because the amendments propose a rate decrease, the FERC also initiated an investigation under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to determine if the rate decrease should be lower than proposed. The FERC accepted the proposed amendments effective OctoberMarch 1, 2017,2022, subject to refund pending the outcome of the further settlement and/or hearing proceedings, and established a refund effective dateprocedures. In June 2023 System Energy filed with the FERC an unopposed offer of October 11, 2017settlement that it had negotiated with respectintervenors to the rate decrease.proceeding. If it is approved by the FERC, the settlement will fully resolve the proceeding.


40

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion regarding storm cost recovery filings. The FERC also consolidatedfollowing is an update to that discussion.

Entergy Louisiana

Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida

As discussed in the Unit Power Sales Agreement amendment proceedingForm 10-K, in August 2020 and October 2020, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta caused significant damage to portions of Entergy Louisiana’s service area. The storms resulted in widespread outages, significant damage to distribution and transmission infrastructure, and the loss of sales during the outages. Additionally, as a result of Hurricane Laura’s extensive damage to the grid infrastructure serving the impacted area, large portions of the underlying transmission system required nearly a complete rebuild. In February 2021 two winter storms (collectively, Winter Storm Uri) brought freezing rain and ice to Louisiana. Ice accumulation sagged or downed trees, limbs, and power lines, causing damage to Entergy Louisiana’s transmission and distribution systems. The additional weight of ice caused trees and limbs to fall into power lines and other electric equipment. When the ice melted, it affected vegetation and electrical equipment, causing additional outages. In August 2021, Hurricane Ida caused extensive damage to Entergy Louisiana’s distribution and, to a lesser extent, transmission systems resulting in widespread power outages.

In April 2022, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the proceedingLPSC relating to Hurricane Ida restoration costs. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Ida were estimated to be approximately $2.54 billion, including approximately $1.96 billion in capital costs and approximately $586 million in non-capital costs. Including carrying costs of $57 million through December 2022, Entergy Louisiana was seeking an LPSC determination that $2.60 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As part of this filing, Entergy Louisiana also was seeking an LPSC determination that an additional $32 million in costs associated with the restoration of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta as well as Winter Storm Uri was prudently incurred. This amount was exclusive of the requested $3 million in carrying costs through December 2022. In total, Entergy Louisiana was requesting an LPSC determination that $2.64 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2022 the LPSC approved financing of a $1 billion storm escrow account from which funds were withdrawn to finance costs associated with Hurricane Ida restoration. In June 2022, Entergy Louisiana supplemented the application with a request regarding the financing and recovery of the recoverable storm restoration costs. Specifically, Entergy Louisiana requested approval to securitize its restoration costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55 financing, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. In October 2022 the LPSC staff recommended a finding that the requested storm restoration costs of $2.64 billion, including associated carrying costs of $59.1 million, were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery from customers. The LPSC staff further recommended approval of Entergy Louisiana’s plans to securitize these costs, net of the $1 billion in funds withdrawn from the storm escrow account described above. The parties negotiated and executed an uncontested stipulated settlement which was filed with the LPSC in December 2022. The settlement agreement contains the following key terms: $2.57 billion of restoration costs from Hurricane Ida, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, and Winter Storm Uri were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery; carrying costs of $59.2 million were recoverable; and Entergy Louisiana was authorized to finance $1.657 billion utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293. In January 2023 the LPSC approved the stipulated settlement subject to certain modifications. These modifications include the recognition of accumulated deferred income tax benefits related to damaged assets and system restoration costs as a reduction of the complaint filedamount authorized to be financed utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293, from $1.657 billion to $1.491 billion. These modifications did not affect the LPSC’s conclusion that all system restoration costs sought by Entergy Louisiana were reasonable and prudent. In February 2023 the Louisiana Bond Commission voted to authorize the Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities and Community

41

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Development Authority (LCDA), a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana, to issue the bonds authorized in the LPSC’s financing order.

In March 2023 the Hurricane Ida securitization financing closed, resulting in the issuance of approximately $1.491 billion principal amount of bonds by the APSCLCDA and MPSC, discussed above,a remaining regulatory asset of $180 million to be recovered through the exclusion of the accumulated deferred income taxes related to damaged assets and directedsystem restoration costs from the partiesdetermination of future rates. The securitization was authorized pursuant to engage in settlement proceedings before an ALJ. If the parties failLouisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation Act, Part VIII of Chapter 9 of Title 45 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. The LCDA loaned the proceeds to comethe LURC. Pursuant to an agreement during settlement proceedings,Act 293, the LURC contributed the net bond proceeds to a prehearing conferenceState legislatively authorized and LURC-sponsored trust, Restoration Law Trust II (the storm trust II).

Pursuant to Act 293, the net proceeds of the bonds were used by the storm trust II to purchase 14,576,757.48 Class B preferred, non-voting membership interest units (the preferred membership interests) issued by Entergy Finance Company, LLC, a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Entergy. Entergy Finance Company is required to make annual distributions (dividends) commencing on December 15, 2023 on the preferred membership interests issued to the storm trust II. These annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be helddistributed to establishEntergy Louisiana and the LURC, as beneficiaries of the storm trust II. Specifically, 1% of the annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be distributed to the LURC for the benefit of customers, and 99% will be distributed to Entergy Louisiana, net of storm trust expenses. The preferred membership interests have a procedural schedulestated annual cumulative cash dividend rate of 7.5% and a liquidation price of $100 per unit. The terms of the preferred membership interests include certain financial covenants to which Entergy Finance Company is subject. Semi-annual redemptions of the preferred membership interests, subject to certain conditions, are expected to occur over the next 15 years.

Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the bonds issued by the LCDA on their balance sheets because the bonds are the obligation of the LCDA. The bonds are secured by system restoration property, which is the right granted by law to the LURC to collect a system restoration charge from customers. The system restoration charge is adjusted at least semi-annually to ensure that it is sufficient to service the bonds. Entergy Louisiana collects the system restoration charge on behalf of the LURC and remits the collections to the bond indenture trustee. Entergy Louisiana began collecting the system restoration charge effective with the first billing cycle of April 2023 and the system restoration charge is expected to remain in place for hearing proceedings.up to 15 years. Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the collections as revenue because Entergy Louisiana is merely acting as a billing and collection agent for the LCDA and the LURC. In the remote possibility that the system restoration charge, as well as any funds in the excess subaccount and funds in the debt service reserve account, are insufficient to service the bonds resulting in a payment default, the storm trust II is required to liquidate Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests in an amount equal to what would be required to cure the default. The estimated value of this indirect guarantee is immaterial.



From the proceeds from the issuance of the preferred membership interests, Entergy Finance Company loaned approximately $1.5 billion to Entergy, which was indirectly contributed to Entergy Louisiana as a capital contribution.

As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, the securitization resulted in recognition of a net reduction of income tax expense of approximately $133 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions, by Entergy Louisiana. Entergy’s recognition of reduced income tax expense was offset by other tax charges resulting in a net reduction of income tax expense of $129 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions. In recognition of its obligations related to an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the securitization regulatory proceeding, Entergy Louisiana recorded in first quarter 2023 a $103 million ($76 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect its obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with customers.


42

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 3 and Note 12 to the financial statements herein, Entergy Louisiana consolidates the storm trust II as a variable interest entity and the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest is shown as noncontrolling interest in the financial statements. In first quarter 2023, Entergy Louisiana recorded a charge of $14.6 million in other income to reflect the LURC’s beneficial interest in the storm trust II.


NOTE 3.  EQUITY (Entergy Corporation and Entergy Louisiana)


Common Stock


Earnings per Share


The following table presents Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
20232022
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
IncomeShares$/shareIncomeShares$/share
Basic earnings per share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation$391.2 211.4 $1.85 $159.7 203.4 $0.79 
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options0.3 — 0.5 (0.01)
Other equity plans0.5 (0.01)0.5 — 
Equity forwards— — 0.3 — 
Diluted earnings per share$391.2 212.2 $1.84 $159.7 204.7 $0.78 
 For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 (In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per shareIncome Shares $/share Income Shares $/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$398.2
 179.6
 
$2.22
 
$388.2
 179.0
 
$2.17
Average dilutive effect of:           
Stock options  0.2
 
   0.3
 
Other equity plans  0.7
 (0.01)   0.7
 (0.01)
Diluted earnings per share
$398.2
 180.5
 
$2.21
 
$388.2
 180.0
 
$2.16


The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately 2.51.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and approximately 3.50.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022.


40

Table of ContentsThe following table presents Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
20232022
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
IncomeShares$/shareIncomeShares$/share
Basic earnings per share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation$702.2 211.4 $3.32 $436.1 203.2 $2.15 
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options0.3 — 0.5 (0.01)
Other equity plans0.5 (0.01)0.4 (0.01)
Equity forwards— — 0.2 — 
Diluted earnings per share$702.2 212.2 $3.31 $436.1 204.3 $2.13 
Notes to Financial Statements

 For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 (In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per shareIncome Shares $/share Income Shares $/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$890.7
 179.5
 
$4.96
 
$1,185.4
 178.8
 
$6.63
Average dilutive effect of:           
Stock options  0.2
 (0.01)   0.2
 (0.01)
Other equity plans  0.5
 (0.01)   0.5
 (0.02)
Diluted earnings per share
$890.7
 180.2
 
$4.94
 
$1,185.4
 179.5
 
$6.60

The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately 3.31.1 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and approximately 4.60.9 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022.



43

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements herein and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.


Dividends declared per common share were $1.07 for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and $1.01 for the three months ended June 30, 2022. Dividends declared per common share were $2.14 for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and $2.02 for the six months ended June 30, 2022.

Equity Distribution Program

In January 2021, Entergy entered into an equity distribution sales agreement with several counterparties establishing an at the market equity distribution program, pursuant to which Entergy may offer and sell from time to time shares of its common stock. The sales agreement provides that, in addition to the issuance and sale of shares of Entergy common stock, Entergy may enter into forward sale agreements for the sale of its common stock. The aggregate number of shares of common stock sold under this sales agreement and under any forward sale agreement may not exceed an aggregate gross sales price of $2 billion. As of June 30, 2023, shares at an aggregate gross sales price of approximately $1,126 million have been sold under the at the market equity distribution program.

During the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, there were no shares of common stock issued under the at the market equity distribution program.

In March 2022, Entergy entered into a forward sale agreement for 1,538,010 shares of common stock. No amounts were recorded on Entergy’s balance sheet with respect to the equity offering until settlements of the equity forward sale agreement occurred in November 2022. The forward sale agreement required Entergy to, at its election prior to September 29, 2023, either (i) physically settle the transactions by issuing the total of 1,538,010 shares of its common stock to the forward counterparty in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement (initially approximately $108.14 per share) or (ii) net settle the transaction in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The forward sale price was subject to adjustment on a daily basis based on a floating interest rate factor and will decrease by other fixed amounts specified in the agreement. In connection with the forward sale agreement, the forward seller, or its affiliates, borrowed from third parties and sold 1,538,010 shares of Entergy Corporation’s common stock. The gross sales price of these shares totaled approximately $168 million. In connection with the sale of these shares, Entergy paid the forward sellers fees of approximately $1.7 million, which have not been deducted from the gross sales price. Entergy did not receive any proceeds from such sales of borrowed shares.

In June 2022, Entergy entered into a forward sale agreement for 2,124,086 shares of common stock. No amounts were recorded on Entergy’s balance sheet with respect to the equity offering until settlements of the equity forward sale agreement occurred in November 2022. The forward sale agreement required Entergy to, at its election prior to December 29, 2023, either (i) physically settle the transactions by issuing the total of 2,124,086 shares of its common stock to the forward counterparty in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement (initially approximately $116.94 per share) or (ii) net settle the transaction in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The forward sale price was subject to adjustment on a daily basis based on a floating interest rate factor and will decrease by other fixed amounts specified in the agreement. In connection with the forward sale agreement, the forward seller, or its affiliates, borrowed from third parties and sold 2,124,086 shares of Entergy Corporation’s common stock. The gross sales price of these shares totaled approximately $250.9 million. In connection with the sale of these shares, Entergy paid the forward sellers fees of approximately $2.5 million, which have not been deducted from the gross sales price. Entergy did not receive any proceeds from such sales of borrowed shares.

In November 2022, Entergy physically settled its obligations under the then-outstanding forward sale agreements by delivering 7,688,419 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of $853.3 million. See Note 7 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the common stock issued and forward sale agreements settled under the at the market equity distribution program.

44

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In June 2023, Entergy entered into forward sale agreements for 102,995 and 365,307 shares of common stock. No amounts have been or will be recorded on Entergy’s balance sheet with respect to the equity offerings until settlements of the equity forward sale agreements occur. The forward sale agreements require Entergy to, at its election prior to May 31, 2024 or June 28, 2024, respectively, either (i) physically settle the transactions by issuing the total of 102,995 and 365,307 shares, respectively, of its common stock to the forward counterparty in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement (initially approximately $101.36 and $101.39 per share, respectively) or (ii) net settle the transaction in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. Each forward sale price is subject to adjustment on a daily basis based on a floating interest rate factor and will decrease by other fixed amounts specified in the agreement. In connection with the forward sale agreements, the forward seller, or its affiliates, borrowed from third parties and sold 102,995 and 365,307 shares, respectively, of Entergy Corporation’s common stock. The gross sales price of these shares totaled approximately $10.5 million and $37.4 million, respectively. In connection with the sale of these shares, Entergy paid the forward sellers fees of approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, which have not been deducted from the gross sales price. Entergy did not receive any proceeds from such sales of borrowed shares.

Until settlement of the forward sale agreements, earnings per share dilution resulting from the agreements, if any, will be determined under the treasury stock method. Share dilution occurs when the average market price of Entergy’s common stock is higher than the average forward sales price. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, 468,302 shares and 956,989 shares, respectively, under the forward sale agreements were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.

Treasury Stock


During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, Entergy Corporation issued 496,177277,804 shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises, vesting of shares of restricted stock, and other stock-based awards.  Entergy Corporation did not repurchase any of its common stock during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023.


Retained Earnings


On October 27, 2017,July 28, 2023, Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.89$1.07 per share, payable on DecemberSeptember 1, 2017,2023 to holders of record as of November 9, 2017.August 11, 2023.


Comprehensive Income


Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy and Entergy Louisiana. The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 by component:2023:
Pension and Other Postretirement Liabilities
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1, 2023($189,727)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(3,292)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(3,292)
Ending balance, June 30, 2023($193,019)

 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Foreign
currency
translation
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 2017
$23,414
 
($449,898) 
$479,257
 
$—
 
$52,773
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications27,884
 
 35,630
 
 63,514
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(14,671) 12,297
 (2,235) 
 (4,609)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period13,213
 12,297
 33,395
 
 58,905
Ending balance, September 30, 2017
$36,627
 
($437,601) 
$512,652
 
$—
 
$111,678
45

41

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1, 2022($1,011)($330,319)($5,248)($336,578)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(14)— 4,101 4,087 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income38 6,045 2,370 8,453 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period24 6,045 6,471 12,540 
Ending balance, June 30, 2022($987)($324,274)$1,223 ($324,038)
 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Foreign
currency
translation
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016
$32,423
 
($453,999) 
$411,581
 
$840
 
($9,155)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications45,162
 
 23,039
 (92) 68,109
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(24,190) 5,044
 (1,672) 
 (20,818)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period20,972
 5,044
 21,367
 (92) 47,291
Ending balance, September 30, 2016
$53,395
 
($448,955) 
$432,948
 
$748
 
$38,136


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 by component:2023:
Pension and Other Postretirement Liabilities
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2023($191,754)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1,265)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(1,265)
Ending balance, June 30, 2023($193,019)


 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Foreign
currency
translation
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
$3,993
 
($469,446) 
$429,734
 
$748
 
($34,971)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications88,550
 
 109,372
 (748) 197,174
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(55,916) 31,845
 (26,454) 
 (50,525)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period32,634
 31,845
 82,918
 (748) 146,649
Ending balance, September 30, 2017
$36,627
 
($437,601) 
$512,652
 
$—
 
$111,678
46


42

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2022($1,035)($338,647)$7,154 ($332,528)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(29)— (11,774)(11,803)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)77 14,373 5,843 20,293 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period48 14,373 (5,931)8,490 
Ending balance, June 30, 2022($987)($324,274)$1,223 ($324,038)
 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Foreign
currency
translation
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2016
$105,970
 
($466,604) 
$367,557
 
$2,028
 
$8,951
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications101,071
 
 72,087
 (1,280) 171,878
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(153,646) 17,649
 (6,696) 
 (142,693)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(52,575) 17,649
 65,391
 (1,280) 29,185
Ending balance, September 30, 2016
$53,395
 
($448,955) 
$432,948
 
$748
 
$38,136


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
20232022
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1,$54,584 $7,665 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1,773)(491)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(1,773)(491)
Ending balance, June 30,$52,811 $7,174 
  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 
($49,122) 
($56,905)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (370) (232)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (370) (232)
Ending balance, September 30, 
($49,492) 
($57,137)


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
20232022
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1,$55,370 $8,278 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(2,559)(1,104)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(2,559)(1,104)
Ending balance, June 30,$52,811 $7,174 


  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 
($48,442) 
($56,412)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (1,050) (725)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (1,050) (725)
Ending balance, September 30, 
($49,492) 
($57,137)
47


43

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized loss
   Interest rate swaps$— ($48)Miscellaneous - net
Total realized loss on cash flow hedges— (48)
Income taxes— 10 Income taxes
Total realized loss on cash flow hedges (net of tax)$— ($38)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
   Amortization of prior-service credit$3,398 $3,837 (a)
   Amortization of net gain (loss)1,633 (10,979)(a)
   Settlement loss(674)(545)(a)
Total amortization and settlement loss4,357 (7,687)
Income taxes(1,065)1,642 Income taxes
Total amortization and settlement loss (net of tax)$3,292 ($6,045)
Net unrealized investment loss
Realized loss$— ($3,750)Interest and investment income
Income taxes— 1,380 Income taxes
Total realized investment loss (net of tax)$— ($2,370)
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)$3,292 ($8,453)

Amounts reclassified
from AOCI

Income Statement Location
 2017 2016  

(In Thousands)

Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
  

   Power contracts
$22,756
 
$37,550

Competitive business operating revenues
   Interest rate swaps(185) (334)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges22,571
 37,216



(7,900) (13,026)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$14,671
 
$24,190





  

Pension and other postretirement liabilities

  

   Amortization of prior-service credit
$6,565
 
$7,354

(a)
   Amortization of loss(21,480) (15,183)
(a)
   Settlement loss(4,200) (1,279)
(a)
Total amortization(19,115) (9,108)


6,818
 4,064

Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($12,297) 
($5,044)



  

Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
  

Realized gain (loss)
$4,382
 
$3,279

Interest and investment income

(2,147) (1,607)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$2,235
 
$1,672





  

Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$4,609
 
$20,818




(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.

(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components were included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


44

48

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized loss
   Interest rate swaps$— ($97)Miscellaneous - net
Total realized loss on cash flow hedges— (97)
Income taxes— 20 Income taxes
Total realized loss on cash flow hedges (net of tax)$— ($77)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
   Amortization of prior-service credit$6,795 $7,674 (a)
   Amortization of net gain (loss)3,295 (24,904)(a)
   Settlement loss(8,490)(1,327)(a)
Total amortization and settlement loss1,600 (18,557)
Income taxes(335)4,184 Income taxes
Total amortization and settlement loss (net of tax)$1,265 ($14,373)
Net unrealized investment loss
Realized loss$— ($9,245)Interest and investment income
Income taxes— 3,402 Income taxes
Total realized investment loss (net of tax)$— ($5,843)
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)$1,265 ($20,293)
 
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
 2017 2016  
 (In Thousands)  
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)     
   Power contracts
$86,678
 
$237,483
 Competitive business operating revenues
   Interest rate swaps(654) (1,104) Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges86,024
 236,379
  
 (30,108) (82,733) Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$55,916
 
$153,646
  
      
Pension and other postretirement liabilities     
   Amortization of prior-service credit
$19,691
 
$22,064
 (a)
   Amortization of loss(64,605) (45,535) (a)
   Settlement loss(5,965) (1,279) (a)
Total amortization(50,879) (24,750)  
 19,034
 7,101
 Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($31,845) 
($17,649)  
      
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)     
Realized gain (loss)
$51,871
 
$13,129
 Interest and investment income
 (25,417) (6,433) Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$26,454
 
$6,696
  
      
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$50,525
 
$142,693
  


(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.

(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components were included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


45

49

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
20232022
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
   Amortization of prior-service credit$951 $1,158 (a)
   Amortization of gain (loss)1,564 (308)(a)
   Settlement loss(89)(178)(a)
Total amortization and settlement loss2,426 672 
Income taxes(653)(181)Income taxes
Total amortization and settlement loss (net of tax)1,773 491 
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)$1,773 $491 
  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2017 2016  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$1,934
 
$1,947
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (1,332) (1,570) (a)
Total amortization 602
 377
  
  (232) (145) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 370
 232
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$370
 
$232
  


(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components were included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy Louisiana for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
20232022
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
   Amortization of prior-service credit$1,902 $2,316 (a)
   Amortization of gain (loss)3,129 (627)(a)
   Settlement loss(1,529)(178)(a)
Total amortization and settlement loss3,502 1,511 
Income taxes(943)(407)Income taxes
Total amortization and settlement loss (net of tax)2,559 1,104 
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)$2,559 $1,104 

(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components were included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


50

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2017 2016  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$5,802
 
$5,841
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (3,996) (4,712) (a)
Total amortization 1,806
 1,129
  
  (756) (404) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 1,050
 725
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$1,050
 
$725
  
Noncontrolling Interests

(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.



The dollar value of noncontrolling interests for Entergy Louisiana as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is presented below:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Entergy Louisiana Noncontrolling Interests
   Restoration Law Trust I (a)$32,359 $31,735 
Restoration Law Trust II (b)14,856 — 
Total Noncontrolling Interests$47,215 $31,735 

(a)See Note 12 to the financial statements herein and Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of Restoration Law Trust I.
(b)Restoration Law Trust II (the storm trust II) was established as part of the Act 293 securitization of Entergy Louisiana’s Hurricane Ida storm restoration costs in March 2023. The storm trust II holds preferred membership interests issued by Entergy Finance Company, and Entergy Finance Company is required to make annual distributions (dividends) on the preferred membership interests. These annual dividends paid on the Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests will be distributed 1% to the LURC and 99% to Entergy Louisiana. Entergy Louisiana, as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the storm trust II and the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for Entergy Louisiana and Entergy. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the Entergy Louisiana March 2023 storm cost securitization.


NOTE 4.  REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in August 2022.June 2028. The facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against 50%$20 million of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently 0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation.  The weighted averageweighted-average interest rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was 2.50%6.34% on the

46

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summaryAs of the borrowingsJune 30, 2023, amounts outstanding and capacity available under the $3.5 billion credit facility as of September 30, 2017.are:
CapacityBorrowingsLetters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500$150$3$3,347
Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $150 $6 $3,344


Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companiesRegistrant Subsidiaries (except Entergy New Orleans)Orleans and System Energy) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facilityEntergy Corporation credit facility’s maturity date may occur.


Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $1.5$2 billion.  At SeptemberAs of June 30, 2017,2023, Entergy Corporation had $1.3 billion$1,108.4 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was 1.45%5.19%.



51

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 as follows:
Company
Expiration

Date
Amount of

Facility
Interest Rate
(a)
Amount Drawn

as of
September
June
30, 2017
2023
Letters of Credit

Outstanding as of September
June
30, 2017
2023
Entergy ArkansasApril 20182024$2025 million (b)2.49%7.02%$—$—
Entergy ArkansasAugust 2022June 2028$150 million (c)2.49%6.33%$75.0 million$—$—
Entergy LouisianaAugust 2022June 2028$350 million (d)(c)2.49%6.45%$—$9.1 million
Entergy MississippiMay 2018July 2023 (e)$37.545 million (e)(d)2.74%6.70%$—$—
Entergy MississippiMay 2018July 2023 (e)$3540 million (e)(d)2.74%6.70%$—$—
Entergy MississippiMay 2018July 2023 (e)$20 million (e)2.74%$—$—
Entergy MississippiMay 2018$10 million (e)(d)2.74%6.70%$—$—
Entergy MississippiJuly 2025$150 million6.33%$—$—
Entergy New OrleansNovember 2018June 2024$25 million (f)(c)2.71%6.83%$—$0.8 million
Entergy TexasAugust 2022June 2028$150 million (g)(c)2.74%6.45%$—$24.41.1 million


(a)The interest rate is the rate as of September 30, 2017 that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Arkansas’s option.
(c)The credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  
(d)The credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  
(e)Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Mississippi’s option.
(f)The credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  
(g)The credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  

(a)The interest rate is the estimated interest rate as of June 30, 2023 that would have been applied to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)Borrowings under this Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Arkansas’s option.
(c)The credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against a portion of the borrowing capacity of the facility as follows: $5 million for Entergy Arkansas; $15 million for Entergy Louisiana; $10 million for Entergy New Orleans; and $30 million for Entergy Texas.
(d)Borrowings under the short-term Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Mississippi’s option.
(e)The short-term Entergy Mississippi credit facilities were terminated in July 2023.

The commitment fees on the credit facilities range from 0.075% to 0.275%0.375% of the undrawn commitment amount.amount for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy Texas, and of the entire facility amount for Entergy New Orleans. Each of the credit facilities requires the Registrant Subsidiary borrower to maintain a debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Each Registrant Subsidiary is in compliance with this covenant.


47

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


In addition, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each entered into one or morean uncommitted standby letter of credit facilitiesfacility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. Following is a summary of the uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017:
2023:
Company
Amount of

Uncommitted Facility
Letter of Credit Fee
Letters of Credit

Issued as of
September
June
30, 2017 2023
(a)
(b)
Entergy Arkansas$25 million0.70%0.78%$211.6 million
Entergy Louisiana$125 million0.70%0.78%$38.520 million
Entergy Mississippi$4065 million0.70%0.78%$12.86.7 million
Entergy New Orleans$15 million0.75%1.625%$7.11 million
Entergy Texas$5080 million0.70%0.875%$19.68.8 million


(a)As of September 30, 2017, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.2 million for Entergy Arkansas and $0.1 million for Entergy Mississippi. See Note 8 to the financial statements herein for discussion of financial transmission rights.

(a)As of June 30, 2023, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission right exposure of $5.9 million for Entergy Arkansas. See Note 8 to the financial statements herein for discussion of financial transmission rights.

52

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(b)As of June 30, 2023, in addition to the $6.7 million MISO letters of credit, Entergy Mississippi had $9.2 million in non-MISO letters of credit outstanding under this facility.

The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC. The currentEntergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas have FERC-authorized short-term borrowing limits are effective through October 31, 2019.April 2025. The FERC-authorized short-term borrowing limit for System Energy is effective through March 2025. In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies may also borrow from the Entergy System money pool and from other internal short-term borrowing arrangements. The money pool and the other internal borrowing arrangements are inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangements designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from internal and external short termshort-term borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits. The following arewere the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 (aggregating both internal and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
 AuthorizedBorrowings
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas$250$152
Entergy Louisiana$450$—
Entergy Mississippi$200$105
Entergy New Orleans$150$—
Entergy Texas$200$—
System Energy$200$—
 Authorized Borrowings
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas$250 $95
Entergy Louisiana$450 $—
Entergy Mississippi$175 $106
Entergy New Orleans$100 $—
Entergy Texas$200 $89
System Energy$200 $—


Vermont Yankee Credit Facility (Entergy Corporation)

In January 2019, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Credit Facilities

was transferred to NorthStar and its credit facility was assumed by Entergy Assets Management Operations, LLC (formerly Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement, LLC), Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has aYankee’s parent company that remains an Entergy subsidiary after the transfer. The credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation withhas a borrowing capacity of $100$139 million whichand expires in January 2018.  Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against the credit facility. This facility provides working capital to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee.December 2024. The commitment fee is currently 0.20% of the undrawn commitment amount.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $802023, $139 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility.  The weighted averageweighted-average interest rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was 2.56%6.28% on the drawn portion of the facility.


Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee also has an uncommitted credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $85 million, which expires in January 2018.  Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against the credit facility. This facility provides an additional funding source to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee.  As of September 30, 2017, there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.

48

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The rate as of September 30, 2017that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility was 2.73%.

Variable Interest Entities (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)


See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIEs).  To finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel, the nuclear fuel company VIEs have credit facilities and three of the four VIEs also issue commercial paper, details of which follow as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017 as follows:2023:
CompanyExpiration
Date
Amount
of
Facility
Weighted-
 Average Interest
 Rate on
 Borrowings (a)
Amount
Outstanding as of
June 30, 2023
(Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIEJune 2025$805.93%$22.5
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIEJune 2025$1055.92%$56.4
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIEJune 2025$1055.82%$49.8
System Energy VIEJune 2025$1205.79%$37.8


53

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Company 
Expiration
Date
 
Amount
of
Facility
 Weighted Average Interest Rate on Borrowings (a) 
Amount
Outstanding as of
September 30, 2017
  
 (Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE May 2019 $80 2.49% $23.3 (b)
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE May 2019 $105 2.33% $78.8
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE May 2019 $85 2.55% $76.9 (c)
System Energy VIE May 2019 $120 2.44% $81.8 (d)
(a)Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the nuclear fuel company VIEs for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company VIE for Entergy Louisiana River Bend does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.

(a)Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company variable interest entity for Entergy Louisiana River Bend does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.
(b)Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for Entergy Arkansas VIE as of September 30, 2017 was $8.3 million.
(c)Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE as of September 30, 2017 was $40.6 million.
(d)Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for System Energy VIE as of September 30, 2017 was $31.8 million.


The commitment fees on the credit facilities are 0.10%0.100% of the undrawn commitment amount for the Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy VIEs.  Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 70% or less of its total capitalization. Each lessee is in compliance with this covenant.


The nuclear fuel company variable interest entitiesVIEs had notes payable that arewere included in debt on the respective balance sheets as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 as follows:
CompanyDescriptionAmount
Entergy Arkansas VIE2.62% Series K due December 2017$60 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.65% Series L due July 2021
$90 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE3.17% Series M due December 2023$40 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE1.84% Series N due July 2026$90 million
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE3.38%2.51% Series RV due August 2020June 2027$70 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE3.92% Series H due February 2021$40 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE3.22% Series I due December 2023$20 million
System Energy VIE3.78%2.05% Series IK due October 2018September 2027$8590 million


In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’VIEs’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.


As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana each had financing authorization from the FERC that extended through April 2025 and System Energy has obtained financing authorization from the FERC that extends through March 2025 for issuances by its nuclear fuel company VIEs.

Debt Issuances and Retirements

(Entergy Arkansas)

In January 2023, Entergy Arkansas issued $425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds due January 2033. Entergy Arkansas used the proceeds, together with other funds, to repay, at maturity, its $250 million of 3.05% Series mortgage bonds due June 2023 and for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy Mississippi)

In May 2023, Entergy Mississippi issued $300 million of 5.0% Series mortgage bonds due September 2033. Entergy Mississippi used the proceeds, together with other funds, to repay, prior to maturity, its $250 million of 3.10% Series mortgage bonds due July 2023 and $50 million of its unsecured term loan due December 2023 and for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy New Orleans)

In May 2023, Entergy New Orleans amended its $70 million unsecured term loan credit agreement, to provide for additional borrowings of $15 million due June 2024. The amended term loan bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 6.25% payable on the unpaid principal amount, compared to the previous rate of 2.5%. Entergy New Orleans used the funds for general corporate purposes.

In July 2023, Entergy New Orleans repaid, at maturity, $100 million of 3.90% Series mortgage bonds.

49

54

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

(System Energy)
Debt Issuances and Retirements

(Entergy Arkansas)


In May 2017, Entergy ArkansasMarch 2023, System Energy issued $220$325 million of 3.5%6.00% Series first mortgage bonds due April 2026. These bonds were a further issuance of the 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds issued in January 2016 and June 2016. Entergy Arkansas2028. System Energy used a portion of the proceeds, from the May 2017 issuance for general corporate purposestogether with other funds, to repay, prior to maturity, its $50 million term loan due November 2023, and used the remainder of the proceeds to pay,repay, at maturity, its $54.7$250 million of 1.55% pollution control revenue refunding bonds due October 2017.

(Entergy Louisiana)

In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana issued $450 million of 3.12% collateral trust4.10% Series mortgage bonds due September 2027. Entergy Louisiana used the proceeds to finance the construction of the St. Charles Power Station, to pay, at maturity, its $45.3 million of Waterford Series collateral trust mortgage notes,April 2023, and for general corporate purposes.


In July 2017 the Entergy Louisiana River Bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its $75 million of 3.25% Series Q notes.

In July 2017 the Entergy Louisiana Waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its $25 million of 3.25% Series G notes.

(System Energy)

In February 2017 the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its $50 million of 4.02% Series H notes.

Fair Value


The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017 are2023 were as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a)
(In Thousands)
Entergy$26,170,727 $23,052,902 
Entergy Arkansas$4,438,803 $3,872,249 
Entergy Louisiana$10,687,807 $9,531,338 
Entergy Mississippi$2,328,900 $2,009,172 
Entergy New Orleans$784,810 $710,894 
Entergy Texas$2,888,075 $2,505,893 
System Energy$752,969 $693,756 
 
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
 (In Thousands)
Entergy
$14,846,729
 
$15,216,502
Entergy Arkansas
$3,063,310
 
$2,979,162
Entergy Louisiana
$6,167,496
 
$6,454,620
Entergy Mississippi
$1,121,606
 
$1,142,048
Entergy New Orleans
$444,310
 
$468,770
Entergy Texas
$1,451,643
 
$1,533,790
System Energy
$551,391
 
$533,855


(a)The values exclude lease obligations of $34 million at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of $183 million at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.

(a)Fair values were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein.

50

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20162022 were as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a)
(In Thousands)
Entergy$25,932,549 $22,573,837 
Entergy Arkansas$4,166,500 $3,538,930 
Entergy Louisiana$10,698,922 $9,444,665 
Entergy Mississippi$2,331,096 $1,987,154 
Entergy New Orleans$775,632 $707,872 
Entergy Texas$2,895,913 $2,485,705 
System Energy$777,905 $702,473 

(a)Fair values were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein.



55
 
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
 (In Thousands)
Entergy
$14,832,555
 
$14,815,535
Entergy Arkansas
$2,829,785
 
$2,623,910
Entergy Louisiana
$5,812,791
 
$5,929,488
Entergy Mississippi
$1,120,916
 
$1,086,203
Entergy New Orleans
$448,994
 
$455,459
Entergy Texas
$1,508,407
 
$1,600,156
System Energy
$551,132
 
$529,520


(a)The values exclude lease obligations of $57 million at Entergy Louisiana and $34 million at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of $182 million at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements
NOTE 5.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)


Entergy grants stock and stock-based awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over three years.

Effective January 1, 2017, Entergy adopted ASU 2016-09, which permits the election of an accounting policy change to the method of recognizing forfeitures of stock-based compensation. Previously, Entergy recorded an estimate of the number of forfeitures expected to occur each period. Entergy elected to change this policy to account for forfeitures when they occur. This accounting change was applied retrospectively, but did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017.


Stock Options


Entergy granted options on 791,900281,874 shares of its common stock under the 2015 Equity Ownership2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan during the first quarter 20172023 with a weighted-average fair value of $6.54$20.07 per option.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were options on 6,055,2262,969,605 shares of common stock outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $81.85.$97.42.  The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the positive difference between the weighted averageweighted-average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.  Because Entergy’s common stock price at September 30, 2017 was less than the weighted average exercise price, the2023.  The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was zero. The intrinsic value of all “in the money” stock options was $19.7 million as of September 30, 2017.    $24.1 million.


51

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s consolidated net income$1.0 $1.2 
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s consolidated net income$0.3 $0.3 
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies$0.6 $0.4 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$1.1
 
$1.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.5
 
$0.5
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.2
 
$0.2

The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s consolidated net income$2.1 $2.3 
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s consolidated net income$0.6 $0.6 
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies$1.1 $0.8 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$3.3
 
$3.3
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$1.3
 
$1.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.6
 
$0.6


Other Equity Awards


In January 20172023 the Board approved and Entergy granted 379,850345,983 restricted stock awards and 220,450143,212 long-term incentive awards under the 2015 Equity Ownership2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan.  The restricted stock awards were made effective as ofon January 26, 20172023 and were valued at $70.53$108.47 per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date.  Shares of restricted stock have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period. One-third of the restricted stock awards and accrued dividends will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date.

In addition, long-term incentive awards were also granted in the form of performance units that represent the value of, and are settled with, one share of Entergy Corporation common stock at the end of the three-year performance period, plus dividends accrued during the performance period on the number of performance units earned. To emphasize the importance of strong cash generation for the long-term health of its business, a credit measure – adjusted funds from operations/debt ratio – was selected as one of the performance measures for the 2023-2025 performance period. Performance will be measured based eighty percent on relative total shareholder return and twenty percent on the credit measure.  The performance units were granted effective as ofon January 26, 20172023 and

56

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
eighty percent were valued at $71.40$130.65 per share.  Entergy considersshare based on various factors, primarily market conditions, in determiningconditions; and twenty percent were valued at $108.47 per share, the valueclosing price of the performance units.  Shares of restricted stock have the same dividend and voting rights as otherEntergy’s common stock are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the 3-year vesting period.on that date.  Performance units have the same dividend rights as shares of Entergy common stock and are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, andvesting. Performance units are expensed ratably over the 3-yearthree-year vesting period.period and compensation cost for the portion of the award based on cumulative adjusted earnings per share will be adjusted based on the number of units that ultimately vest. See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the Long-Term Performance Unit Program.


The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s consolidated net income$10.1 $10.6 
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s consolidated net income$2.6 $2.7 
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies$4.4 $4.3 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$7.6
 
$8.5
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$3.0
 
$3.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$2.1
 
$2.0


The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s consolidated net income$17.8 $22.0 
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s consolidated net income$4.6 $5.6 
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies$7.6 $8.7 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$24.1
 
$25.4
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$9.3
 
$9.8
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$6.3
 
$5.7




52

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 6.  RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Components of Qualified Net Pension Cost

Entergy’s qualified pension cost,costs, including amounts capitalized, for the thirdsecond quarters of 20172023 and 2016,2022, included the following components:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$25,366 $36,977 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation74,033 52,676 
Expected return on assets(95,752)(103,085)
Amortization of net loss21,307 56,413 
Settlement charges7,246 22,653 
Net pension costs$32,200 $65,634 
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$33,410
 
$35,811
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation65,206
 65,403
Expected return on assets(102,056) (97,366)
Amortization of prior service cost65
 270
Amortization of loss56,930
 48,824
Net pension costs
$53,555
 
$52,942

Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:

 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$100,230
 
$107,433
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation195,618
 196,209
Expected return on assets(306,168) (292,098)
Amortization of prior service cost195
 810
Amortization of loss170,790
 146,472
Net pension costs
$160,665
 
$158,826
57

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
 Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$5,090
 
$6,925
 
$1,472
 
$625
 
$1,364
 
$1,536
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 12,944
 14,809
 3,732
 1,791
 3,392
 3,091
Expected return on assets (20,427) (23,017) (6,131) (2,800) (6,180) (4,663)
Amortization of loss 11,640
 12,354
 3,053
 1,658
 2,310
 2,964
Net pension cost 
$9,247
 
$11,071
 
$2,126
 
$1,274
 
$886
 
$2,928

53

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy’s qualified pension costs, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, included the following components:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$51,044 $74,637 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation149,734 103,795 
Expected return on assets(193,885)(206,692)
Amortization of net loss43,654 116,992 
Settlement charges145,674 22,653 
Net pension costs$196,221 $111,385 
2016 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$5,181
 
$7,049
 
$1,562
 
$656
 
$1,416
 
$1,566
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 13,055
 14,870
 3,811
 1,814
 3,557
 2,992
Expected return on assets (19,772) (22,096) (5,981) (2,687) (6,062) (4,459)
Amortization of loss 10,936
 11,946
 2,985
 1,615
 2,340
 2,604
Net pension cost 
$9,400
 
$11,769
 
$2,377
 
$1,398
 
$1,251
 
$2,703


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost,costs, including amounts capitalized, for their current and former employees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017second quarters of 2023 and 2016,2022, included the following components:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
 Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$4,661 $6,199 $1,456 $487 $1,090 $1,445 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation13,917 14,944 3,824 1,669 3,162 3,435 
Expected return on assets(17,878)(18,766)(4,635)(2,310)(4,023)(4,501)
Amortization of net loss5,763 4,992 1,627 484 1,059 1,274 
Settlement charges1,784 2,232 88 592 490 
Net pension cost$8,247 $9,601 $2,360 $337 $1,880 $2,143 

2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
 Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$6,699 $9,007 $2,075 $752 $1,579 $2,001 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation9,761 10,684 2,796 1,139 2,272 2,394 
Expected return on assets(19,031)(21,060)(5,164)(2,515)(4,905)(4,586)
Amortization of net loss12,848 12,302 3,620 1,368 2,439 3,171 
Settlement charges11,496 4,461 2,208 — 2,466 2,023 
Net pension cost$21,773 $15,394 $5,535 $744 $3,851 $5,003 


58

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$15,270
 
$20,775
 
$4,416
 
$1,875
 
$4,092
 
$4,608
Interest cost on projects benefit obligation 38,832
 44,427
 11,196
 5,373
 10,176
 9,273
Expected return on assets (61,281) (69,051) (18,393) (8,400) (18,540) (13,989)
Amortization of loss 34,920
 37,062
 9,159
 4,974
 6,930
 8,892
Net pension cost 
$27,741
 
$33,213
 
$6,378
 
$3,822
 
$2,658
 
$8,784
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension costs, including amounts capitalized, for their current and former employees for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, included the following components:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
 Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$9,410 $12,479 $2,938 $978 $2,197 $2,912 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation28,197 30,323 7,754 3,384 6,404 6,963 
Expected return on assets(35,954)(37,999)(9,519)(4,577)(8,175)(9,039)
Amortization of net loss12,732 9,956 3,392 997 2,049 2,735 
Settlement charges23,958 38,230 11,743 1,700 10,270 5,290 
Net pension cost$38,343 $52,989 $16,308 $2,482 $12,745 $8,861 
2016 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$15,543
 
$21,147
 
$4,686
 
$1,968
 
$4,248
 
$4,698
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 39,165
 44,610
 11,433
 5,442
 10,671
 8,976
Expected return on assets (59,316) (66,288) (17,943) (8,061) (18,186) (13,377)
Amortization of loss 32,808
 35,838
 8,955
 4,845
 7,020
 7,812
Net pension cost 
$28,200
 
$35,307
 
$7,131
 
$4,194
 
$3,753
 
$8,109


2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
 Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$13,557 $18,144 $4,205 $1,504 $3,211 $4,046 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation19,078 21,183 5,474 2,278 4,447 4,732 
Expected return on assets(38,278)(42,193)(10,367)(5,030)(9,842)(9,209)
Amortization of net loss26,274 24,899 7,430 2,736 4,994 6,437 
Settlement charges11,496 4,461 2,208 — 2,466 2,023 
Net pension cost$32,127 $26,494 $8,950 $1,488 $5,276 $8,029 

Non-Qualified Net Pension Cost


Entergy recognized $15.8$8.8 million and $8$7.2 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the thirdsecond quarters of 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans in the thirdsecond quarters of 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively, is a $11.6were settlement charges of $4.6 million and $3.7$2.5 million related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plans. Entergy recognized $18 million and $17.4 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were settlement chargecharges of $9.3 million and $7.8 million related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plans.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their current and former employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the second quarters of 2023 and 2022:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
2023$63 $25 $87 $33 $63 
2022$71 $26 $79 $27 $88 


59

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their current and former employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
2023$513 $52 $639 $66 $126 
2022$143 $53 $161 $56 $303 

Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’ non-qualified pension costs for the six months ended June 30, 2023 were settlement charges of $379 thousand related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Reflected in Entergy recognized $28.9 million and $16.5 million in pensionsMississippi’s non-qualified pension costs for its non-qualified pension plans for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022 were settlement charges of $453 thousand and 2016,$2 thousand, respectively, is a $15.5 million and $3.7 million settlement charge related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of thisthe plan.


54

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans in the third quarters of 2017 and 2016:
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Thousands)
2017
$111
 
$46
 
$62
 
$18
 
$124
2016
$105
 
$58
 
$60
 
$16
 
$126

Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’sTexas’ non-qualified pension costs infor the third quartersix months ended June 30, 2022 were settlement charges of 2017 is $10$119 thousand in settlement charges related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Thousands)
2017
$483
 
$141
 
$189
 
$55
 
$377
2016
$317
 
$176
 
$179
 
$48
 
$380

Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s non-qualified pension costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is $173 thousand in settlement charges related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of this plan.


Components of Net Other Postretirement BenefitBenefits Cost (Income)


Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost,benefits income, including amounts capitalized, for the thirdsecond quarters of 20172023 and 2016,2022, included the following components:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$3,664 $6,184 
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)10,568 6,827 
Expected return on assets(9,183)(10,855)
Amortization of prior service credit(5,640)(6,388)
Amortization of net (gain) loss(2,862)1,083 
Net other postretirement benefits income($3,453)($3,149)
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$6,729
 
$8,073
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)13,960
 14,083
Expected return on assets(9,408) (10,455)
Amortization of prior service credit(10,356) (11,373)
Amortization of loss5,476
 4,554
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$6,401
 
$4,882


Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost,benefits income, including amounts capitalized, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, included the following components:
 20232022
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$7,328 $12,368 
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)21,136 13,654 
Expected return on assets(18,366)(21,710)
Amortization of prior service credit(11,280)(12,776)
Amortization of net (gain) loss(5,724)2,166 
Net other postretirement benefits income($6,906)($6,298)
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$20,187
 
$24,219
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)41,880
 42,249
Expected return on assets(28,224) (31,365)
Amortization of prior service credit(31,068) (34,119)
Amortization of loss16,428
 13,662
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$19,203
 
$14,646



55

60

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefits cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for their current and former employees for the second quarters of 2023 and 2022, included the following components:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$741 $845 $220 $59 $202 $189 
Interest cost on APBO2,001 2,233 543 290 649 432 
Expected return on assets(3,778)— (1,179)(1,316)(2,194)(634)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)524 (951)(239)(229)(1,093)(73)
Amortization of net (gain) loss43 (1,764)21 117 229 — 
Net other postretirement benefits cost (income)($469)$363 ($634)($1,079)($2,207)($86)

2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$1,114 $1,408 $339 $99 $331 $310 
Interest cost on APBO1,263 1,443 350 174 399 279 
Expected return on assets(4,483)— (1,394)(1,499)(2,568)(791)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)471 (1,158)(443)(229)(1,093)(80)
Amortization of net (gain) loss218 (186)56 (225)162 30 
Net other postretirement benefits cost (income)($1,417)$1,507 ($1,092)($1,680)($2,769)($252)

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefitbenefits cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for their current and former employees for the third quarters of 2017six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2016,2022, included the following components:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$1,482 $1,690 $440 $118 $404 $378 
Interest cost on APBO4,002 4,466 1,086 580 1,298 864 
Expected return on assets(7,556)— (2,358)(2,632)(4,388)(1,268)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)1,048 (1,902)(478)(458)(2,186)(146)
Amortization of net (gain) loss86 (3,528)42 234 458 — 
Net other postretirement benefits cost (income)($938)$726 ($1,268)($2,158)($4,414)($172)
2017 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$863
 
$1,593
 
$290
 
$142
 
$372
 
$320
Interest cost on APBO 2,255
 3,025
 690
 469
 1,124
 559
Expected return on assets (3,959) 
 (1,200) (1,159) (2,180) (717)
Amortization of prior service credit (1,278) (1,934) (456) (186) (579) (378)
Amortization of loss 1,115
 465
 419
 105
 826
 390
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($1,004) 
$3,149
 
($257) 
($629) 
($437) 
$174


2016 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$978
 
$1,869
 
$386
 
$156
 
$398
 
$334
Interest cost on APBO 2,324
 3,260
 709
 448
 1,039
 529
Expected return on assets (4,464) 
 (1,379) (1,154) (2,394) (814)
Amortization of prior service credit (1,368) (1,947) (234) (186) (681) (393)
Amortization of loss 1,064
 732
 223
 37
 537
 287
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($1,466) 
$3,914
 
($295) 
($699) 
($1,101) 
($57)
61

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$2,589
 
$4,779
 
$870
 
$426
 
$1,116
 
$960
Interest cost on APBO 6,765
 9,075
 2,070
 1,407
 3,372
 1,677
Expected return on assets (11,877) 
 (3,600) (3,477) (6,540) (2,151)
Amortization of prior service credit (3,834) (5,802) (1,368) (558) (1,737) (1,134)
Amortization of loss 3,345
 1,395
 1,257
 315
 2,478
 1,170
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($3,012) 
$9,447
 
($771) 
($1,887) 
($1,311) 
$522


56

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period$2,228 $2,816 $678 $198 $662 $620 
Interest cost on APBO2,526 2,886 700 348 798 558 
Expected return on assets(8,966)— (2,788)(2,998)(5,136)(1,582)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)942 (2,316)(886)(458)(2,186)(160)
Amortization of net (gain) loss436 (372)112 (450)324 60 
Net other postretirement benefits cost (income)($2,834)$3,014 ($2,184)($3,360)($5,538)($504)
2016 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$2,934
 
$5,607
 
$1,158
 
$468
 
$1,194
 
$1,002
Interest cost on APBO 6,972
 9,780
 2,127
 1,344
 3,117
 1,587
Expected return on assets (13,392) 
 (4,137) (3,462) (7,182) (2,442)
Amortization of prior service credit (4,104) (5,841) (702) (558) (2,043) (1,179)
Amortization of loss 3,192
 2,196
 669
 111
 1,611
 861
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($4,398) 
$11,742
 
($885) 
($2,097) 
($3,303) 
($171)


Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the thirdsecond quarters of 20172023 and 2016:2022:
2023Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit$— $3,510 ($112)$3,398 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(1,104)2,897 (160)1,633 
Settlement loss(310)— (364)(674)
($1,414)$6,407 ($636)$4,357 
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit$— $951 $— $951 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(200)1,764 — 1,564 
Settlement loss(89)— — (89)
($289)$2,715 $— $2,426 

2022Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit$— $4,014 ($177)$3,837 
Amortization of net loss(10,035)(596)(348)(10,979)
Settlement loss(178)— (367)(545)
($10,213)$3,418 ($892)($7,687)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit$— $1,158 $— $1,158 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(493)186 (1)(308)
Settlement loss(178)— (6)(178)
($671)$1,344 ($1)$672 


2017 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
  (In Thousands)  
Entergy        
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit 
($65) 
$6,718
 
($88) 
$6,565
Amortization of loss (18,451) (2,202) (827) (21,480)
Settlement loss 
 
 (4,200) (4,200)
  
($18,516) 
$4,516
 
($5,115) 
($19,115)
Entergy Louisiana        
Amortization of prior service credit 
$—
 
$1,934
 
$—
 
$1,934
Amortization of loss (865) (465) (2) (1,332)
  
($865) 
$1,469
 
($2) 
$602
62
2016
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total


(In Thousands)

Entergy







Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit

($270)

$7,738


($114)

$7,354
Amortization of loss
(12,482)
(2,063)
(638)
(15,183)
Settlement loss




(1,279)
(1,279)



($12,752)

$5,675


($2,031)

($9,108)
Entergy Louisiana







Amortization of prior service credit

$—


$1,947


$—


$1,947
Amortization of loss
(836)
(732)
(2)
(1,570)



($836)

$1,215


($2)

$377


57

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016:2022:
2023Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit$— $7,020 ($225)$6,795 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(2,144)5,796 (357)3,295 
Settlement loss(6,957)— (1,533)(8,490)
($9,101)$12,816 ($2,115)$1,600 
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit$— $1,902 $— $1,902 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(398)3,528 (1)3,129 
Settlement loss(1,529)— — (1,529)
($1,927)$5,430 ($1)$3,502 

2022Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit$— $8,028 ($354)$7,674 
Amortization of net loss(22,945)(1,192)(767)(24,904)
Settlement loss(178)— (1,149)(1,327)
($23,123)$6,836 ($2,270)($18,557)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit$— $2,316 $— $2,316 
Amortization of net gain (loss)(997)372 (2)(627)
($1,175)$2,688 ($2)$1,511 

Accounting for Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

In accordance with ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” the other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations and are presented by Entergy in miscellaneous - net in other income.

Qualified Pension Settlement Costs

Year-to-date lump sum benefit payments from the Entergy Corporation Retirement Plan for Bargaining Employees and the Entergy Corporation Retirement Plan for Non-Bargaining Employees exceeded the sum of the Plans’ 2023 service and interest cost, resulting in settlement costs. In accordance with accounting standards, settlement accounting requires immediate recognition of the portion of previously unrecognized losses associated with the settled portion of the plan’s pension liability. Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy each participate in one or both of the Entergy Corporation Retirement Plan for Bargaining Employees and the Entergy Corporation Retirement Plan for Non-Bargaining Employees and incurred settlement costs. Similar to other pension costs, the settlement costs were

63

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2017
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total


(In Thousands)

Entergy







Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit

($195)

$20,152


($266)

$19,691
Amortization of loss
(55,351)
(6,606)
(2,648)
(64,605)
Settlement loss




(5,965)
(5,965)



($55,546)

$13,546


($8,879)

($50,879)
Entergy Louisiana







Amortization of prior service credit

$—


$5,802


$—


$5,802
Amortization of loss
(2,594)
(1,395)
(7)
(3,996)



($2,594)

$4,407


($7)

$1,806
included with employee labor costs and charged to expense and capital in the same manner that labor costs were charged. Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans each received regulatory approval to defer the expense portion of the settlement costs, with future amortization of the deferred settlement expense over the period in which the expense otherwise would be recorded had the immediate recognition not occurred.

2016 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
  (In Thousands)  
Entergy        
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit 
($810) 
$23,214
 
($340) 
$22,064
Amortization of loss (37,446) (6,189) (1,900) (45,535)
Settlement loss 
 
 (1,279) (1,279)
  
($38,256) 
$17,025
 
($3,519) 
($24,750)
Entergy Louisiana        
Amortization of prior service credit 
$—
 
$5,841
 
$—
 
$5,841
Amortization of loss (2,508) (2,196) (8) (4,712)
  
($2,508) 
$3,645
 
($8) 
$1,129
Entergy Texas Reserve


In September 2020, Entergy Texas elected to establish a reserve, in accordance with PUCT regulations, for the difference between the amount recorded for pension and other postretirement benefits expense under generally accepted accounting principles during 2019, the first year that rates from Entergy Texas’s last general rate proceeding were in effect, and the annual amount of actuarially determined pension and other postretirement benefits chargeable to Entergy Texas’s expense. The reserve amounts recorded for 2020 and 2021 were included in the base rate case that was filed with the PUCT in July 2022, and amortization of that amount began in 2023 when interim rates became effective. At June 30, 2023, the balance in this reserve was approximately $39.2 million.

Employer Contributions


Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute $409.9$267 million to its qualified pension plans in 2017.2023.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, Entergy had contributed $318$91.5 million to its pension plans.  Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans for their employees in 2017:2023:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Expected 2023 pension contributions$54,468 $44,565 $21,110 $1,420 $5,314 $15,543 
Pension contributions made through June 2023$18,444 $13,518 $7,130 $355 $1,438 $5,529 
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2023$36,024 $31,047 $13,980 $1,065 $3,876 $10,014 
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands)
Expected 2017 pension contributions
$79,725
 
$86,728
 
$19,063
 
$9,842
 
$16,908
 
$18,307
Pension contributions made through September 2017
$62,252
 
$67,993
 
$14,922
 
$7,832
 
$13,131
 
$14,498
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2017
$17,473
 
$18,735
 
$4,141
 
$2,010
 
$3,777
 
$3,809



58

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy Corporation

Entergy’shas a single reportable segments as of September 30, 2017 aresegment, Utility, and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Utilitywhich includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.  Entergy Wholesale Commoditiesbusiness in portions of Louisiana.  The Utility segment reflects management’s primary basis of organization with a predominant focus on its utility operations in the Gulf South. Parent & Other includes the ownership, operation,parent company, Entergy Corporation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners andbusiness activity, including Entergy’s non-utility operations business which owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.  “All Other” includescustomers and also provides decommissioning services to nuclear power plants owned by non-affiliated entities in the parent company, United States.

As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, Entergy completed its multi-year strategy to exit the merchant nuclear power business in 2022 and upon completion of all transition activities, effective January 1, 2023, Entergy Wholesale Commodities is no longer a reportable segment. See Note 13 and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the asset impairments and restructuring charges related to the decision to exit the merchant nuclear power business. Remaining business activity previously reported under Entergy Wholesale Commodities is now included under Parent & Other. Historical segment

64

Entergy Corporation and other business activity.Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements
financial information presented herein has been restated for the second quarter 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 to reflect the change in reportable segments. The change in reportable segments had no effect on Entergy’s consolidated financial statements or historical segment financial information for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016 is as follows:    
Utility reportable segment.
  Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy
  (In Thousands)
2017          
Operating revenues 
$2,820,421
 
$423,245
 
$—
 
($38) 
$3,243,628
Income taxes 
$230,647
 
$25,563
 
($14,415) 
$—
 
$241,795
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$403,733
 
$55,765
 
($25,956) 
($31,898) 
$401,644
2016          
Operating revenues 
$2,649,392
 
$475,345
 
$—
 
($34) 
$3,124,703
Income taxes 
$255,603
 
$6,115
 
($3,812) 
$—
 
$257,906
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$447,782
 
$8,221
 
($30,901) 
($31,898) 
$393,204
           


Entergy’s segment financial information for the ninesecond quarters of 2023 and 2022 was as follows:
UtilityParent & OtherEliminationsConsolidated
(In Thousands)
2023
Operating revenues$2,818,747 $27,287 ($8)$2,846,026 
Income taxes$144,489 ($9,693)$— $134,796 
Consolidated net income (loss)$514,498 ($40,559)($81,925)$392,014 
2022
Operating revenues$3,306,269 $88,933 ($6)$3,395,196 
Income taxes($371,704)$12,061 $— ($359,643)
Consolidated net income (loss)$156,548 $50,714 ($43,251)$164,011 

Entergy’s segment financial information for the six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 is2022 was as follows:
UtilityParent & OtherEliminationsConsolidated
(In Thousands)
2023
Operating revenues$5,766,738 $60,358 ($11)$5,827,085 
Income taxes$78,363 ($22,542)$— $55,821 
Consolidated net income (loss)$912,664 ($70,953)($137,399)$704,312 
Total assets as of June 30, 2023$64,059,477 $855,229 ($5,197,470)$59,717,236 
2022
Operating revenues$6,034,425 $238,711 ($14)$6,273,122 
Income taxes($296,346)$3,201 $— ($293,145)
Consolidated net income (loss)$499,704 $19,097 ($75,197)$443,604 
Total assets as of December 31, 2022$61,399,243 $884,442 ($3,688,494)$58,595,191 
  Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy
  (In Thousands)
2017          
Operating revenues 
$7,156,865
 
$1,293,867
 
$—
 
($96) 
$8,450,636
Income taxes 
$459,990
 
($507,719) 
($39,826) 
$—
 
($87,555)
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$817,738
 
$252,455
 
($73,434) 
($95,695) 
$901,064
Total assets as of September 30, 2017 
$42,669,606
 
$5,630,207
 
$985,466
 
($2,886,837) 
$46,398,442
2016          
Operating revenues 
$6,855,664
 
$1,341,534
 
$—
 
($80) 
$8,197,118
Income taxes 
$359,653
 
($176,626) 
($34,148) 
$—
 
$148,879
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$1,027,751
 
$338,651
 
($69,672) 
($95,695) 
$1,201,035
Total assets as of December 31, 2016 
$41,098,751
 
$6,696,038
 
$1,283,816
 
($3,174,171) 
$45,904,434


The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business is sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.”  Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity. Almost all of Entergy’s goodwill is related to the Utility segment.

59

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, Entergy management has undertaken a strategy to manage and reduce the risk of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business, which includes taking actions to reduce the size of the merchant fleet. These decisions and transactions resulted in asset impairments; employee retention and severance expenses and other benefits-related costs; and contracted economic development contributions in 2016.

Additional restructuring charges for the third quarter 2017 were comprised of the following:
 
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1, 2017
$36
 
$21
 
$57
Restructuring costs accrued23
 
 23
Non-cash portion
 (7) (7)
Balance as of September 30, 2017
$59
 
$14
 
$73

In addition, Entergy incurred $16 million of impairment charges in the third quarter 2017 related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets. These costs are charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
Additional restructuring charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were comprised of the following:
 Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2017
$70
 
$21
 
$91
Restructuring costs accrued89
 
 89
Non-cash portion
 (7) (7)
Cash paid out100
 
 100
Balance as of September 30, 2017
$59
 
$14
 
$73

In addition, Entergy incurred $422 million of impairment charges in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets.


Registrant Subsidiaries


Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business.  Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations isare managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results. Management allocates resources and assesses financial performance on a consolidated basis.





60

65

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 8.  RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Market Risk


In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market risks.  Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular commodity or instrument.  All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk including commodity price risk, equity price, and interest rate risk.  Entergy uses derivatives primarily to mitigate commodity price risk, particularly power price and fuel price risk.


The Utility has limited exposure to the effects of market risk because it operates primarily under cost-based rate regulation.  To the extent approved by their retail regulators, the Utility operating companies use derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to price volatility inherent in their purchased power, fuel, and gas purchased for resale costs, that are recovered from customers.

As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy and capacity in the day ahead or spot markets.  In addition to its forward physical power and gas contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to mitigate commodity price risk.  When the market price falls, the combination of instruments is expected to settle in gains that offset lower revenue from generation, which results in a more predictable cash flow.


Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity.  For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk.  A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk.  Hedging instruments and volumes are chosen based on ability to mitigate risk associated with future energy and capacity prices; however, other considerations are factored into hedge product and volume decisions including corporate liquidity, corporate credit ratings, counterparty credit risk, hedging costs, firm settlement risk, and product availability in the marketplace.  Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies.  Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods.  These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.


Derivatives


Some derivative instruments are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sale transactions due to their physical settlement provisions.  Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements.  Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options and interest rate swaps.options.  Entergy may enter into financially-settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk that may or may not be designated as hedging instruments.

Entergy enters into derivatives to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities.  Electricity over-the-counter instruments and futures contracts that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation.  The maximum length of time over which Entergy Wholesale Commodities is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at September 30, 2017 is approximately 3.5 years.  Planned generation currently under contract from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is 88% for the remainder of 2017,

61

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

of which approximately 31% is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/normal sale contracts.  Total planned generation for the remainder of 2017 is 7.6 TWh.

Entergy may use standardized master netting agreements to help mitigate the credit risk of derivative instruments. These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty and may include collateral requirements. Cash, letters of credit, and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk. The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds an established threshold. The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit, which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with Entergy’s credit policy. In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.

Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations depending on the mark-to-market values of the contracts. The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guarantee.  As of September 30, 2017, there were no derivative contracts with counterparties in a liability position. In addition to the corporate guarantee, $1 million in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties and $4 million in cash collateral and $28 million in letters of credit were required to be posted by its counterparties to the Entergy subsidiary. As of December 31, 2016, derivative contracts with three counterparties were in a liability position (approximately $8 million total). In addition to the corporate guarantee, $2 million in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below investment grade, Entergy would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under the contract at the applicable date.


Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps and options that financially settle against either the average Henry Hub Gas Daily prices or the NYMEX futures.Henry Hub. These swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel expense with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities. All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas price volatility for electric generation at Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Mississippi and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy New Orleans. The maximum length of time over which Entergy has executed natural gas swaps and options as of June 30, 2023 is 9 months, for each of Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. The total volume of natural gas swaps and options outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 is 27,702,90021,084,400 MMBtu for Entergy, including 21,673,2005,500,000 MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana, 5,042,70015,305,100 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi, and 987,000279,300 MMBtu for Entergy New Orleans. Credit support for these natural gas swaps and options is covered by master agreements that do not require Entergy to provide collateral based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to requests for collateral.


66

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

During the second quarter 2017,2023, Entergy participated in the annual financial transmission rights auction process for the MISO planning year of June 1, 20172023 through May 31, 2018.2024. Financial transmission rights are derivative instruments whichthat represent economic hedges of future congestion charges that will be incurred in serving Entergy’s customer load. They are not designated as hedging instruments. Entergy initially records financial transmission rights at their estimated fair value and subsequently adjusts the carrying value to their estimated fair value at the end of each accounting period prior to settlement. Unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility operations are included in operating revenues. The Utility operating companies recognize regulatory liabilities or assets for unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights. The total volume of financial transmission rights outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 is 75,621140,203 GWh for Entergy, including 17,01434,517 GWh for Entergy Arkansas, 33,70060,886 GWh for Entergy Louisiana, 10,21417,426 GWh for Entergy Mississippi, 3,8395,439 GWh for Entergy New Orleans, and 10,32621,597 GWh for Entergy Texas. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by the Utility operating companies is covered by cash and/or letters of credit issued by each Utility operating company as required by MISO. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility operations is covered by cash. No cash or letters of credit were required to be posted for financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility operations as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016.2022. Letters of credit posted with MISO covered the financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Arkansas as of June 30, 2023 and for Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy MississippiTexas as of SeptemberDecember 31, 2022.

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016.2022 are shown in the tables below.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.

InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationGross Fair Value (a)Offsetting Position (b)Net Fair Value (c) (d)
(In Millions)
2023
Assets:
Natural gas swaps and optionsPrepayments and other$2$—$2
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$44($4)$40
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps and optionsOther current liabilities$12$—$12

2022
Assets:   
Natural gas swaps and optionsPrepayments and other$13$—$13
Natural gas swaps and optionsOther deferred debits and other assets$3$—$3
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$21($2)$19
Liabilities:   
Natural gas swaps and optionsOther current liabilities$25$—$25

(a)Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
62

67

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

(c)Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheets
(d)Excludes cash collateral in the amount of $8 million posted as of December 31, 2022. Also excludes letters of credit in the amount of $6 million posted as of June 30, 2023 and $3 million posted as of December 31, 2022.

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
InstrumentIncome Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
2023
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($1)
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(b)$32
2022
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)$23
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(b)$37

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
InstrumentIncome Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
2023
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($38)
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(b)$48
2022
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)$78
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(b)$60

(a)Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps and options are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses

68

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.

The fair values of Entergy’sthe Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments in the consolidatednot designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheetsheets as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 are shown in the table below. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationGross Fair Value (a)Offsetting Position (b)Net Fair Value (c) (d)Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Natural gas swaps and optionsPrepayments and other$2.1$—$2.1Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$19.8($0.2)$19.6Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$16.9($0.2)$16.7Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$2.0($0.8)$1.2Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$1.6($0.1)$1.5Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$3.5($2.3)$1.2Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swapsOther current liabilities$12.6$—$12.6Entergy Mississippi
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $52 ($22) $30 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $29 ($7) $22 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities
(current portion)
 $17 ($17) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $7 ($7) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $11 ($3) $8 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $1 ($1) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $39 ($2) $37 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities(current portion) $8 ($8) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $1 ($1) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $1 $— $1 Utility



63

69

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 are shown in the table below.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $25 ($14) $11 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $6 ($6) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $11 ($10) $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $16 ($7) $9 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $18 ($13) $5 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $5 ($5) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps Prepayments and other $13 $— $13 Utility
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $22 ($1) $21 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $18 ($17) $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $4 ($4) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities

(a)Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheet
(d)Excludes cash collateral in the amount of $1 million posted and $4 million held as of September 30, 2017 and $2 million posted as of December 31, 2016. Also excludes $28 million in letters of credit held as of September 30, 2017.



64

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Instrument 
Amount of gain
recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location 
Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)
  (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2017      
Electricity swaps and options $43 Competitive businesses operating revenues $23
       
2016      
Electricity swaps and options $70 Competitive businesses operating revenues $37

(a)Before taxes of $8 million and $13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Instrument Amount of gain
recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)

 (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2017      
Electricity swaps and options $136 Competitive businesses operating revenues $87
       
2016      
Electricity swaps and options $156 Competitive businesses operating revenues $237
(a)Before taxes of $30 million and $83 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively

At each reporting period, Entergy measures its hedges for ineffectiveness. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings during the period. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in competitive business operating revenues. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $6.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively.

Based on market prices as of September 30, 2017, unrealized gains recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled $59 million of net unrealized gains.  Approximately $37 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to

65

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

operating revenues in the next twelve months.  The actual amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.    

Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation.  Gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in other comprehensive income until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
InstrumentAmount of loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive incomeIncome Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)(In Millions)
2017
Natural gas swaps$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($3)
Financial transmission rights$—Purchased power expense(b)$28
Electricity swaps and options($2)(c)Competitive business operating revenues$—
2016
Natural gas swaps$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)$25
Financial transmission rights$—Purchased power expense(b)$37
Electricity swaps and options($9)(c)Competitive business operating revenues$—


66

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
Income Statement
location

Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
  (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2017 
    
Natural gas swaps $— Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($20)
Financial transmission rights
$—
Purchased power expense(b)$103
Electricity swaps and options $2(c)Competitive business operating revenues $—
       
2016      
Natural gas swaps $— Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($5)
Financial transmission rights $— Purchased power expense(b)$96
Electricity swaps and options $6(c)Competitive business operating revenues ($9)

(a)Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(c)Amount of gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income from electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items.


67

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:
InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationFair Value (a)Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$4.4Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$18.8Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$5.5Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$3.5Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$5.0Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swapsOther current liabilities$0.7Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsOther current liabilities$0.2Entergy Mississippi

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 are2022 were as follows:
InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationGross Fair Value (a)Offsetting Position (b)Net Fair Value (c) (d)Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Natural gas swaps and optionsPrepayments and other $13.1$—$13.1Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps and optionsOther deferred debits and other assets$3.4$—$3.4Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$10.3$—$10.3Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$7.7($0.4)$7.3Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$0.6$—$0.6Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$0.8$—$0.8Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$1.2($1.1)$0.1Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swapsOther current liabilities$24.0$—$24.0Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsOther current liabilities$1.5$—$1.5Entergy New Orleans
InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationFair Value (a)Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Natural gas swapsPrepayments and other$10.9Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsPrepayments and other$2.3Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsPrepayments and other$0.2Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$5.4Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$8.5Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$3.2Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$1.1Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPrepayments and other$3.1Entergy Texas


(a)Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(a)As of September 30, 2017, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.2 million for Entergy Arkansas and $0.1 million for Entergy Mississippi. As of December 31, 2016, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.3 million for Entergy Arkansas and $0.1 million for Entergy Mississippi.

(b)Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets
(d)As of June 30, 2023, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $5.9 million for Entergy Arkansas. As of December 31, 2022, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.2 million for Entergy Mississippi, $0.2 million for Entergy New Orleans, and $2.4 million for Entergy Texas.

68

70

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
InstrumentIncome Statement LocationAmount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2023
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$0.8(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($1.2)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$0.1(a)Entergy New Orleans
InstrumentFinancial transmission rightsIncome Statement LocationPurchased power expenseAmount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement$4.1
(b)RegistrantEntergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(In Millions)$19.5(b)Entergy Louisiana
2017Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$3.0(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$1.5(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$3.5(b)Entergy Texas
2022
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($2.6)$8.7(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.6)$14.6(a)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.2(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$9.4(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.7(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$1.9(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$7.0(b)Entergy Texas
2016
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$19.5($0.2)(a)Entergy LouisianaNew Orleans
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$5.3(a)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$7.116.0(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$20.416.1(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$6.72.2(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$0.91.6(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$1.81.0(b)Entergy Texas





69

71

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were as follows:
InstrumentIncome Statement LocationAmount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2023
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($5.7)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($29.8)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($2.1)(a)Entergy New Orleans
InstrumentFinancial transmission rights
Income Statement LocationPurchased power expense
Amount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement$8.0

(b)
RegistrantEntergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense(In Millions)$28.3(b)Entergy Louisiana
2017Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense
$4.5
(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$2.4(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.2(b)Entergy Texas
2022
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($16.3)$19.8(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($3.1)$57.4(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.1)$0.9(a)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$19.3(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$38.9(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$16.3(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$7.7(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$19.2(b)Entergy Texas
2016
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($4.6)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$0.3(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.5)(a)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$20.3(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$52.5(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$11.1(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$2.8(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$8.7(b)Entergy Texas

(a)Financial transmission rightsDue to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
Purchased power expense$23.5(b)Entergy Arkansas
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financialFinancial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchasedPurchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as purchased$25.5(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense when the financial$3.2(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.Purchased power expense$2.4(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.9(b)Entergy Texas


(a)Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps and options are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.

Fair Values


The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using historical prices, bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling.  Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates

70

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

of fair value.  Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize

72

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
in a current market exchange.  Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than those instruments held by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business are reflected in future rates and therefore do not affect net income. Entergy considers the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.


Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value.  The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.


Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs.


The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:


Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.  Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents (temporary cash investments, securitization recovery trust account, and escrow accounts), debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts.swaps traded on exchanges with active markets.  Cash equivalents includes all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.


Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads.  Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value.  Level 2 inputs include the following:


quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 2 consists primarily of individually-owned debt instruments.instruments and gas swaps and options valued using observable inputs.


Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources.  These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best estimate of fair value for the asset or liability.  Level 3 consists primarily of financial transmission rights and derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.rights.

The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates.  They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities.  The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Business Unit Risk Control group and the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group.  The primary functions of the Business Unit Risk

71

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Control group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market risk analyses and valuations in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of market risks, and implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system.  The Business Unit Risk Control group is also responsible for managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis.  The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group performs functions related to market and counterparty settlements, revenue reporting and analysis and financial accounting. The Business Unit Risk Control group reports to the Vice President and Treasurer while the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.

The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable to or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date.  These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business.  The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices.  The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities.  For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.

The amounts reflected as the fair values of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes.  Inputs to the valuation include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third party data aggregator, and U.S. Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate.  As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value.  

On a daily basis, the Business Unit Risk Control group calculates the mark-to-market for electricity swaps and options.  The Business Unit Risk Control group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to other sources of forward market prices or to settlement prices of actual market transactions.  Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on these other sources of forward market prices or settlement prices of actual market transactions.  Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions when available and compared with other sources of market implied volatilities.  Moreover, on at least a monthly basis, the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark-to-market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis.  The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions, an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio.  In particular, the credit and liquidity effects are calculated for this analysis.  This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.


The values of financial transmission rights are based on unobservable inputs, including estimates of congestion costs in MISO between applicable generation and load pricing nodes based on the 50th percentile of historical prices.  They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities.  The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Business UnitOffice of Corporate Risk Control group.Oversight.  The values are calculated internally and verified against the data published by MISO. Entergy’s Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reviews these valuations for reasonableness, with the

73

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
assistance of others within the organization with knowledge of the various inputs and assumptions used in the valuation. The Business UnitOffice of Corporate Risk Control groups reportOversight reports to the Vice President and Treasurer.  The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.


72

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016.2022.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$1,127 $— $— $1,127 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities19 — — 19 
Debt securities586 1,121 — 1,707 
Common trusts (b)2,834 
Securitization recovery trust account— — 
Storm reserve escrow accounts411 — — 411 
Gas hedge contracts— — 
Financial transmission rights— — 40 40 
$2,150 $1,121 $40 $6,145 
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts$12 $— $— $12 
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$459
 
$—
 
$—
 
$459
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 487
 
 
 487
Debt securities 1,035
 1,394
 
 2,429
Common trusts (b)       4,067
Power contracts 
 
 60
 60
Securitization recovery trust account 53
 
 
 53
Escrow accounts 407
 
 
 407
Financial transmission rights 
 
 37
 37
  
$2,441
 
$1,394
 
$97
 
$7,999
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$1


2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:    
Temporary cash investments$109 $— $— $109 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):    
Equity securities24 — — 24 
Debt securities534 1,122 — 1,656 
Common trusts (b)2,442 
Securitization recovery trust account13 — — 13 
Storm reserve escrow accounts402 — — 402 
Gas hedge contracts13 — 16 
Financial transmission rights— — 19 19 
 $1,095 $1,125 $19 $4,681 
Liabilities:    
Gas hedge contracts$25 $— $— $25 

(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$1,058
 
$—
 
$—
 
$1,058
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 480
 
 
 480
Debt securities 985
 1,228
 
 2,213
Common trusts (b)       3,031
Power contracts 
 
 16
 16
Securitization recovery trust account 46
 
 
 46
Escrow accounts 433
 
 
 433
Gas hedge contracts 13
 
 
 13
Financial transmission rights 
 
 21
 21
  
$3,015
 
$1,228
 
$37
 
$7,311
Liabilities:        
Power contracts 
$—
 
$—
 
$11
 
$11
74

(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.


73

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets for the fair value of financial transmission rights classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,$7 $1 
Total gains (losses) for the period
Included as a regulatory liability/asset23 32 
Issuances of financial transmission rights42 16 
Settlements(32)(37)
Balance as of June 30,$40 $12 

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets for the fair value of financial transmission rights classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
20232022
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,$19 $4 
Total gains (losses) for the period
Included as a regulatory liability/asset27 52 
Issuances of financial transmission rights42 16 
Settlements(48)(60)
Balance as of June 30,$40 $12 

The fair values of the Level 3 financial transmission rights are based on unobservable inputs calculated internally and verified against historical pricing data published by MISO.


75

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Entergy Arkansas

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$3.9 $— $— $3.9 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities1.6 — — 1.6 
Debt securities135.7 349.1 — 484.8 
Common trusts (b)840.2 
Financial transmission rights— — 19.6 19.6 
$141.2 $349.1 $19.6 $1,350.1 

2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$3.4 $— $— $3.4 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities4.5 — — 4.5 
Debt securities126.8 343.9 — 470.7 
Common trusts (b)724.7 
Financial transmission rights— — 10.3 10.3 
$134.7 $343.9 $10.3 $1,213.6 

Entergy Louisiana

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$856.8 $— $— $856.8 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities14.4 — — 14.4 
Debt securities249.5 503.9 — 753.4 
Common trusts (b)1,205.3 
Storm reserve escrow account300.0 — — 300.0 
Gas hedge contracts2.1 — — 2.1 
Financial transmission rights— — 16.7 16.7 
$1,422.8 $503.9 $16.7 $3,148.7 


76

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
 (In Millions)
Assets:    
Temporary cash investments$6.3 $— $— $6.3 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):    
Equity securities16.8 — — 16.8 
Debt securities209.4 515.7 — 725.1 
Common trusts (b)1,037.2 
Storm reserve escrow account293.4 — — 293.4 
Gas hedge contracts13.1 3.4 — 16.5 
Financial transmission rights— — 7.3 7.3 
 $539.0 $519.1 $7.3 $2,102.6 

Entergy Mississippi

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$8.4 $— $— $8.4 
Storm reserve escrow account34.3 — — 34.3 
Financial transmission rights— — 1.2 1.2 
$42.7 $— $1.2 $43.9 
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts$12.6 $— $— $12.6 

2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$17.0 $— $— $17.0 
Storm reserve escrow account33.5 — — 33.5 
Financial transmission rights— — 0.6 0.6 
 $50.5 $— $0.6 $51.1 
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts$24.0 $— $— $24.0 


77

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy New Orleans

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$141.3 $— $— $141.3 
Securitization recovery trust account1.7 — — 1.7 
Storm reserve escrow account76.7 — — 76.7 
Financial transmission rights— — 1.5 1.5 
$219.7 $— $1.5 $221.2 

2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$4.4 $— $— $4.4 
Securitization recovery trust account2.2 — — 2.2 
Storm reserve escrow account75.0 — — 75.0 
Financial transmission rights— — 0.8 0.8 
$81.6 $— $0.8 $82.4 
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts$1.5 $— $— $1.5 

Entergy Texas

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$2.8 $— $— $2.8 
Securitization recovery trust account3.6 — — 3.6 
Financial transmission rights— — 1.2 1.2 
$6.4 $— $1.2 $7.6 

2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$3.0 $— $— $3.0 
Securitization recovery trust account10.9 — — 10.9 
Financial transmission rights— — 0.1 0.1 
$13.9 $— $0.1 $14.0 


78

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
System Energy

2023Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$46.2 $— $— $46.2 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities2.5 — — 2.5 
Debt securities200.7 268.4 — 469.1 
Common trusts (b)788.7 
$249.4 $268.4 $— $1,306.5 

2022Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments$2.9 $— $— $2.9 
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities2.8 — — 2.8 
Debt securities197.5 262.2 — 459.7 
Common trusts (b)680.4 
$203.2 $262.2 $— $1,145.8 

(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,$4.0 $2.5 $0.2 $0.3 ($0.1)
Issuances of financial transmission rights20.6 18.1 1.4 1.4 0.2 
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset(0.9)15.6 2.6 1.3 4.6 
Settlements(4.1)(19.5)(3.0)(1.5)(3.5)
Balance as of June 30,$19.6 $16.7 $1.2 $1.5 $1.2 

79

Entergy Corporation and 2016:Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
 2017 2016
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$38
 
$57
 
$66
 
$46
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings2
 
 6
 
Included in other comprehensive income43
 
 70
 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 8
 
 22
Settlements(23) (28) (47) (37)
Balance as of September 30,
$60
 
$37
 
$95
 
$31

(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights

(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$5
 
$21
 
$189
 
$23
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings6
 1
 (3) 
Included in other comprehensive income136
 
 156
 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 56
 
 49
Issuances of financial transmission rights
 62
 
 55
Settlements(87) (103) (247) (96)
Balance as of September 30,
$60
 
$37
 
$95
 
$31

(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification as of September 30, 2017:
Transaction Type 
Fair Value
as of
September 30, 2017
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
from
Average
%
 
Effect on
Fair Value
  (In Millions)      (In Millions)
Power contracts - electricity swaps $60 Unit contingent discount +/-4% $5

74

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction TypePositionChange to Input
Effect on
Fair Value
Unit contingent discountElectricity swapsSellIncrease (Decrease)Decrease (Increase)

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Entergy Arkansas
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 
$6.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$6.7
Debt securities 128.4
 205.7
 
 334.1
Common trusts (b)       569.6
Securitization recovery trust account 7.8
 
 
 7.8
Escrow accounts 2.4
 
 
 2.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 4.4
 4.4
  
$145.3
 
$205.7
 
$4.4
 
$925.0

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 
$3.6
 
$—
 
$—
 
$3.6
Debt securities 112.5
 196.8
 
 309.3
Common trusts (b)       521.8
Securitization recovery trust account 4.1
 
 
 4.1
Escrow accounts 7.1
 
 
 7.1
Financial transmission rights 
 
 5.4
 5.4
  
$127.3
 
$196.8
 
$5.4
 
$851.3


75

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Louisiana
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$45.4
 
$—
 
$—
 
$45.4
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 10.8
 
 
 10.8
Debt securities 145.5
 333.3
 
 478.8
Common trusts (b)       770.4
Escrow accounts 288.8
 
 
 288.8
Securitization recovery trust account 9.4
 
 
 9.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 18.8
 18.8
  
$499.9
 
$333.3
 
$18.8
 
$1,622.4
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.7

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$163.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$163.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):  
  
  
  
Equity securities 13.9
 
 
 13.9
Debt securities 132.3
 292.5
 
 424.8
Common trusts (b)       702.0
Escrow accounts 305.7
 
 
 305.7
Securitization recovery trust account 2.8
 
 
 2.8
Gas hedge contracts 10.9
 
 
 10.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 8.5
 8.5
  
$629.5
 
$292.5
 
$8.5
 
$1,632.5

Entergy Mississippi
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Escrow accounts 
$31.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$31.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 5.5
 5.5
  
$31.9
 
$—
 
$5.5
 
$37.4
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.2


76

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$76.8
 
$—
 
$—
 
$76.8
Escrow accounts 31.8
 
 
 31.8
Gas hedge contracts 2.3
 
 
 2.3
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.2
 3.2
  
$110.9
 
$—
 
$3.2
 
$114.1

Entergy New Orleans
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$28.4
 
$—
 
$—
 
$28.4
Securitization recovery trust account 4.7
 
 
 4.7
Escrow accounts 84.2
 
 
 84.2
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.5
 3.5
  
$117.3
 
$—
 
$3.5
 
$120.8

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$103.0
 
$—
 
$—
 
$103.0
Securitization recovery trust account 1.7
 
 
 1.7
Escrow accounts 88.6
 
 
 88.6
Gas hedge contracts 0.2
 
 
 0.2
Financial transmission rights 
 
 1.1
 1.1
  
$193.5
 
$—
 
$1.1
 
$194.6

Entergy Texas
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Securitization recovery trust account 
$30.8
 
$—
 
$—
 
$30.8
Financial transmission rights 
 
 5.0
 5.0
  
$30.8
 
$—
 
$5.0
 
$35.8

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Temporary cash investments 
$5.0
 
$—
 
$—
 
$5.0
Securitization recovery trust account 37.5
 
 
 37.5
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.1
 3.1
  
$42.5
 
$—
 
$3.1
 
$45.6


77

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

System Energy
2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$144.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$144.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 2.6
 
 
 2.6
Debt securities 198.2
 131.4
 
 329.6
Common trusts (b)       538.4
  
$345.7
 
$131.4
 
$—
 
$1,015.5

2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$245.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$245.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 0.3
 
 
 0.3
Debt securities 248.3
 58.3
 
 306.6
Common trusts (b)       473.6
  
$493.7
 
$58.3
 
$—
 
$1,025.6

(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2022.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,$0.4 $0.3 $0.2 $0.1 $0.5 
Issuances of financial transmission rights5.4 5.3 0.8 0.8 3.9 
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset14.6 15.2 1.7 1.3 (1.9)
Settlements(16.0)(16.1)(2.2)(1.6)(1.0)
Balance as of June 30,$4.4 $4.7 $0.5 $0.6 $1.5 
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$8.3
 
$28.3
 
$9.1
 
$5.2
 
$5.5
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset0.3
 (0.1) 1.1
 0.2
 6.5
Settlements(4.2) (9.4) (4.7) (1.9) (7.0)
Balance as of September 30,
$4.4
 
$18.8
 
$5.5
 
$3.5
 
$5.0


78

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2023.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,$10.3 $7.3 $0.6 $0.8 $0.1 
Issuances of financial transmission rights20.6 18.1 1.4 1.4 0.2 
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset(3.3)19.6 3.7 1.7 5.1 
Settlements(8.0)(28.3)(4.5)(2.4)(4.2)
Balance as of June 30,$19.6 $16.7 $1.2 $1.5 $1.2 
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$14.0
 
$16.2
 
$5.6
 
$2.0
 
$8.0
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset1.2
 16.6
 5.1
 0.5
 (1.1)
Settlements(7.1) (20.4) (6.7) (0.9) (1.8)
Balance as of September 30,
$8.1
 
$12.4
 
$4.0
 
$1.6
 
$5.1


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2022.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,$2.3 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 $0.8 
Issuances of financial transmission rights5.4 5.3 0.8 0.8 3.9 
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset20.2 24.3 2.6 2.1 1.7 
Settlements(23.5)(25.5)(3.2)(2.4)(4.9)
Balance as of June 30,$4.4 $4.7 $0.5 $0.6 $1.5 
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$5.4
 
$8.5
 
$3.2
 
$1.1
 
$3.1
Issuances of financial transmission rights8.9
 31.0
 9.6
 5.0
 7.1
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset9.4
 18.2
 9.0
 5.1
 14.0
Settlements(19.3) (38.9) (16.3) (7.7) (19.2)
Balance as of September 30,
$4.4
 
$18.8
 
$5.5
 
$3.5
 
$5.0



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$7.9
 
$8.5
 
$2.4
 
$1.5
 
$2.2
Issuances of financial transmission rights18.8
 18.1
 5.9
 2.8
 9.3
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset1.7
 38.3
 6.8
 0.1
 2.3
Settlements(20.3) (52.5) (11.1) (2.8) (8.7)
Balance as of September 30,
$8.1
 
$12.4
 
$4.0
 
$1.6
 
$5.1


NOTE 9.  DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)


Entergy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain nuclear decommissioning trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, and Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee,

79

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

and Palisades.  TheGulf. Entergy’s nuclear decommissioning trust funds are invested primarilyinvest in equity securities, fixed-rate debt securities, and cash and cash equivalents.

See Note 16 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants to Entergy. In January 2017, NYPA transferred to Entergy the Indian Point 3 decommissioning trust fund with a fair value of $726 million and the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund with a fair value of $793 million.

As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements herein, in March 2017, Entergy closed on the sale of the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. As part of the transaction, Entergy transferred the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund to Exelon. The FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund had a disposition-date fair value of $805 million and was classified as held for sale within other deferred debits as of December 31, 2016.


Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value.  Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory

80

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets.  For the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun, Entergy Louisiana has recordedrecords an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) in other deferred credits.credits for the unrealized trust earnings not currently expected to be needed to decommission the plant.  Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee, andthe Palisades donon-utility nuclear plant did not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment.  Accordingly, unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on the equity securities in the trust funds were recognized in earnings. Unrealized gains recorded on the assetsavailable-for-sale debt securities in thesethe trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity because these assets are classified as available-for-sale.equity.  Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assetsavailable-for-sale debt securities in thesethe trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other-than-temporaryother than temporary and therefore recorded in earnings. Generally, Entergy records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.


As discussed in Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in June 2022, Entergy completed the sale of Palisades to Holtec. As part of the transaction, Entergy transferred the Palisades decommissioning trust fund to Holtec. The securities held as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2017      
Equity Securities 
$4,554
 
$1,983
 
$—
Debt Securities 2,429
 45
 14
Total 
$6,983
 
$2,028
 
$14
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2016      
Equity Securities 
$3,511
 
$1,673
 
$1
Debt Securities 2,213
 34
 27
Total 
$5,724
 
$1,707
 
$28

Thedisposition-date fair valuesvalue of the decommissioning trust funds related tofund was approximately $552 million.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plantsthree and six months ended June 30, 2023 on equity securities still held as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017 are $478 million for Indian Point 1, $607 million for Indian Point 2, $774 million for Indian Point 3, $445 million for Palisades, $1,037 million for Pilgrim, and $601 million for Vermont Yankee. The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds for the Registrant Subsidiaries’ nuclear plants are detailed below.

80

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Deferred taxes on unrealized gains/(losses) are recorded in other comprehensive income for the decommissioning trusts which do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment as described above. Unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of $4722023 were $211 million and $399$372 million, as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  The amortized cost of debt securities was $2,398 million as of September 30, 2017 and $2,212 million as of December 31, 2016.  As of September 30, 2017, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.21%, an average duration of approximately 6.17 years, and an average maturity of approximately 10.07 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index. The debt securities are generally held in individual government and credit issuances.

The fair valueavailable-for-sale securities held as of June 30, 2023 and grossDecember 31, 2022 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2023
Debt Securities$1,707 $5 $172 
2022
Debt Securities$1,655 $4 $201 

As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there were no deferred taxes on unrealized lossesgains/(losses). The amortized cost of available-for-sale equity and debt securities summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as followswas $1,874 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$5
 
$—
 
$732
 
$5
More than 12 months
 
 267
 9
Total
$5
 
$—
 
$999
 
$14

The fair value2023 and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows$1,852 million as of December 31, 2016:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$23
 
$1
 
$1,169
 
$26
More than 12 months1
 
 20
 1
Total
$24
 
$1
 
$1,189
 
$27

The fair value2022.  As of June 30, 2023, available-for-sale debt securities summarized by contractual maturities, ashad an average coupon rate of September 30, 2017approximately 3.15%, an average duration of approximately 6.38 years, and December 31, 2016 are as follows:an average maturity of approximately 10.81 years.


 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$91
 
$125
1 year - 5 years801
 763
5 years - 10 years789
 719
10 years - 15 years130
 109
15 years - 20 years87
 73
20 years+531
 424
Total
$2,429
 
$2,213
81

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $440 million and $564 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and

81

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by length of time that the securities had been in a continuous loss position, were as follows as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
2016,
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months$583 $21 $840 $63 
More than 12 months922 151 666 138 
Total$1,505 $172 $1,506 $201 

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year$106 $62 
1 year - 5 years490 520 
5 years - 10 years481 461 
10 years - 15 years116 117 
15 years - 20 years156 161 
20 years+358 334 
Total$1,707 $1,655 

During the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $136 million and $333 million, respectively.  During the three months ended June 30, 2023, there were no gross gains and $8 million in gross losses reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $9$1 million and $6 million, respectively, and gross losses of $2$16 million and $1 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $1,903$260 million and $1,797$636 million, respectively.  During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023, there were $1 million in gross gains and 2016,$17 million in gross losses reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $79$2 million and $26 million, respectively, and gross losses of $9$28 million and $6 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.



82

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Arkansas


Entergy Arkansas holds debt and equity securities classified asand available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2023
Debt Securities$484.8 $0.4 $62.4 
2022
Debt Securities$470.7 $0.2 $69.3 
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2017      
Equity Securities 
$576.3
 
$327.2
 
$—
Debt Securities 334.1
 3.1
 2.3
Total 
$910.4
 
$330.3
 
$2.3
       
2016      
Equity Securities 
$525.4
 
$281.5
 
$—
Debt Securities 309.3
 3.4
 4.2
Total 
$834.7
 
$284.9
 
$4.2


The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $333.3$546.8 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and $310.1$539.8 million as of December 31, 2016.2022.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the available-for-sale debt securities havehad an average coupon rate of approximately 2.53%2.46%, an average duration of approximately 5.835.94 years, and an average maturity of approximately 6.787.43 years.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 on equity securities still held as of June 30, 2023 were $62.1 million and $109.4 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities havehad been in a continuous loss position, arewere as follows as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017:2023 and December 31, 2022:
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months$75.0 $2.2 $197.6 $18.8 
More than 12 months379.7 60.2 260.1 50.5 
Total$454.7 $62.4 $457.7 $69.3 


 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$114.4
 
$0.6
More than 12 months
 
 37.3
 1.7
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$151.7
 
$2.3
83


82

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2016:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$146.7
 
$4.2
More than 12 months
 
 
 
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$146.7
 
$4.2

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016 are2022 were as follows:
 20232022
 (In Millions)
Less than 1 year$38.9 $21.2 
1 year - 5 years146.7 159.7 
5 years - 10 years194.7 191.7 
10 years - 15 years42.1 38.0 
15 years - 20 years42.1 42.6 
20 years+20.3 17.5 
Total$484.8 $470.7 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$11.8
 
$16.7
1 year - 5 years107.9
 106.2
5 years - 10 years194.4
 161.2
10 years - 15 years2.6
 7.7
15 years - 20 years1.4
 1.0
20 years+16.0
 16.5
Total
$334.1
 
$309.3


During the three months endedSeptember June 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $51.9$0.9 million and $61.2$8.8 million, respectively.  During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016,2023, there were no gross gains of $0.04and $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, andin gross losses of $0.5 thousand and $0.04 million, respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

During the ninethree months endedSeptember June 30, 2017 and 2016, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $219.2 million and $165 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2022, there were gross gains of $11.7$0.03 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.2 million and $0.3 million respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.



During the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $16.6 million and $15.9 million, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2023, there were no gross gains and $1.7 million in gross losses reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $0.06 million and gross losses of $0.5 million reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
83

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Entergy Louisiana


Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity securities classified asand available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2023
Debt Securities$753.4 $3.4 $54.1 
2022
Debt Securities$725.1 $3.5 $67.5 
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2017      
Equity Securities 
$781.2
 
$420.3
 
$—
Debt Securities 478.8
 10.9
 2.8
Total 
$1,260.0
 
$431.2
 
$2.8
       
2016      
Equity Securities 
$715.9
 
$346.6
 
$—
Debt Securities 424.8
 8.0
 5.0
Total 
$1,140.7
 
$354.6
 
$5.0


The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $470.7$804 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and $421.9$789.1 million as of December 31, 2016.2022.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the available-for-sale debt securities havehad an average coupon rate of approximately 3.84%3.69%, an average duration of approximately 5.766.54 years, and an average maturity of approximately 11.613.10 years.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 on equity securities still held as of June 30, 2023 were $90.3 million and $159.6 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2017:84
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$127.3
 
$1.1
More than 12 months
 
 51.5
 1.7
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$178.8
 
$2.8

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2016:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$198.8
 
$4.8
More than 12 months
 
 4.8
 0.2
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$203.6
 
$5.0

84

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by length of time that the securities had been in a continuous loss position, were as follows as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months$312.5 $9.5 $409.9 $24.6 
More than 12 months302.5 44.6 207.5 42.9 
Total$615.0 $54.1 $617.4 $67.5 

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016 are2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year$45.6 $33.6 
1 year - 5 years153.3 159.1 
5 years - 10 years170.0 161.7 
10 years - 15 years68.9 67.1 
15 years - 20 years77.2 83.3 
20 years+238.4 220.3 
Total$753.4 $725.1 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$27.7
 
$31.4
1 year - 5 years113.2
 99.1
5 years - 10 years117.1
 122.8
10 years - 15 years50.7
 41.4
15 years - 20 years43.4
 30.9
20 years+126.7
 99.2
Total
$478.8
 
$424.8


During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $50.5$65.2 million and $54.7$120.3 million, respectively.  During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016,2023, there were gross gains of $2.9$0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.1$4 million reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $0.2 million, and $0.1gross losses of $6.7 million respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $176.1$132.6 million and $178.2$240.9 million, respectively.  During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016,2023, there were gross gains of $7.9$0.5 million and $3 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.4$9 million reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $1.1 million, and $0.2gross losses of $12.2 million respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.



85

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
System Energy


System Energy holds debt and equity securities classified asand available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2023
Debt Securities$469.1 $0.8 $55.1 
2022
Debt Securities$459.7 $0.7 $63.7 
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2017      
Equity Securities 
$541.0
 
$276.2
 
$—
Debt Securities 329.6
 3.7
 1.9
Total 
$870.6
 
$279.9
 
$1.9
       
2016      
Equity Securities 
$473.9
 
$221.9
 
$0.1
Debt Securities 306.6
 2.0
 4.5
Total 
$780.5
 
$223.9
 
$4.6


The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $327.8$523.4 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and $309.1$522.7 million as of December 31, 2016.2022.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the available-for-sale debt securities havehad an average coupon rate of approximately 2.44%2.97%, an average duration of approximately 6.376.56 years, and an average maturity of approximately 8.8810.58 years.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 on equity securities still held as of June 30, 2023 were $58.4 million and $102.8 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.



The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by length of time that the securities had been in a continuous loss position, were as follows as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months$195.8 $9.5 $231.9 $19.2 
More than 12 months239.4 45.6 198.0 44.5 
Total$435.2 $55.1 $429.9 $63.7 

85

86

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2017:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$135.6
 
$1.0
More than 12 months
 
 57.5
 0.9
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$193.1
 
$1.9

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2016:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$220.9
 
$4.4
More than 12 months
 0.1
 0.8
 0.1
Total
$—
 
$0.1
 
$221.7
 
$4.5

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016 are2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year$21.0 $6.8 
1 year - 5 years190.1 201.7 
5 years - 10 years115.8 107.1 
10 years - 15 years4.8 11.7 
15 years - 20 years36.3 35.0 
20 years+101.1 97.4 
Total$469.1 $459.7 
 2017 2016
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$8.7
 
$6.6
1 year - 5 years170.7
 188.2
5 years - 10 years79.1
 78.5
10 years - 15 years4.4
 1.3
15 years - 20 years6.5
 7.8
20 years+60.2
 24.2
Total
$329.6
 
$306.6


During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $54.6$69.9 million and $103.5$67.8 million, respectively.  During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023, there were no gross gains and 2016,$4.1 million in gross losses reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $0.2$0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.2$4.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale debt securities amounted to $308.1$111.2 million and $392.9$104 million, respectively.  During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023, there were no gross gains and 2016,$6.3 million in gross losses reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were gross gains of $0.7$0.2 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and gross losses of $1.5$5.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.



Allowance for expected credit losses
86

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains andestimates the expected credit losses

Entergy evaluates investment for its available-for-sale securities in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear decommissioning trust funds with unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred.  The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs.  Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basiscurrent credit rating and remaining life of the debtsecurities.  To the extent an individual security an other-than-temporary impairment is considereddetermined to have occurred andbe uncollectible, it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss).  Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debtwritten off against this allowance.  Entergy’s available-for-sale securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  The assessment of whether an investmentare held in an equity security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on a number of factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and, then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a reasonable period of time.  Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments.  Specifically, available-for-sale securities are subject to credit worthiness restrictions, with requirements for both the average credit rating of the portfolio and minimum credit ratings for individual debt securities.  Entergy did not have an allowance for expected credit losses related to available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Entergy did not record material charges to other incomeany impairments of available-for-sale debt securities for the three and ninesix months endedSeptember June 30, 2017 and 2016, resulting from2023. Entergy did not record any impairments of available-for-sale debt securities for the recognitionthree months ended June 30, 2022. Entergy recorded $1.5 million in impairments of available-for-sale debt securities for the other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.six months ended June 30, 2022.




NOTE 10.  INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


See “Income Tax Audits” and “Other Tax Matters” in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax audits, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and other income tax matters involving Entergy. The following are updates to that discussion.


As discussed in the Form 10-K, inTax Cuts and Jobs Act

During the second quarter 2016, Entergy made a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal2018, the Registrant Subsidiaries began returning unprotected excess accumulated deferred income tax purposes its subsidiary that owned the FitzPatrick nuclear power plant.  The effect of the election was that the plant and associated assets were deemed to be contributed to a new corporation for federal income tax purposes, which created permanent and temporary differences, as discussed in the Form 10-K.  One permanent difference, which increased tax expense in 2016 under the applicable accounting standards, was the reduction to the plant’s tax basis to the extent that it exceeded its fair market value.  Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant on March 31, 2017.  The removal of the contingencies regarding the sale of the plant and the receipt of NRC approval for the sale allowed Entergy to re-determine the plant’s tax basis, using the closing price as indicative of a higher fair market value for the plant.  The re-determined basis resulted in a $44 million income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.

In the second quarter 2017, Entergy made tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant. This resulted in a constructive contribution of all the assets and liabilitiestaxes, associated with the plants to new subsidiary corporations for federal income tax purposes, and generated both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards. The constructive contributions required the Entergy subsidiary that constructively contributed the assets and liabilities to recognize the plants’ nuclear decommissioning liabilities for income tax purposes resulting in permanent differences. The accrualeffects of the nuclear decommissioning liabilities required EntergyTax Cuts and Jobs Act, to recognize a gain for income tax purposes, a portion of which resulted in an increase in tax basis of the assets constructively contributed to the subsidiaries. Recognition of the gain and the increase in tax basis of the assets represents a temporary difference. The permanent differences reduced income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, by $373 million.

In the first quarter 2017, Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” Entergy will now prospectively recognize all income tax effects related to share-based payments through the income statement. In the first quarter 2017, stock option expirations, along with other stock compensation activity, resulted in the write-off of $11.5 million of deferred

their customers

87

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

through rate riders and other means approved by their respective regulatory authorities. Return of the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes results in a reduction in the regulatory liability for income taxes and a corresponding reduction in income tax expense. This manner of regulatory accounting affects the effective tax rate for the period as compared to the statutory tax rate. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes for Entergy or the Registrant Subsidiaries for the three months ended June 30, 2023 or for the six months ended June 30, 2023. For the three months ended June 30, 2022, the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes reduced the regulatory liability for income taxes by $16 million for Entergy, including $9 million for Entergy Louisiana and $7 million for Entergy Texas. For the six months ended June 30, 2022, the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes reduced the regulatory liability for income taxes by $33 million for Entergy, including $18 million for Entergy Louisiana, $1 million for Entergy New Orleans, and $14 million for Entergy Texas.
tax assets. Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans are discussed
Other Tax Matters

Act 293 Securitization

As described in Note 122 to the financial statements herein, Entergy Louisiana implemented a securitization authorized under Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021 in the Form 10-K.first quarter 2023. Act 293 provides that the LURC contribute the net bond proceeds to a LURC-sponsored trust. Over the 15-year term of the Act 293 bonds, the storm trust II will make distributions to Entergy Louisiana, a beneficiary of the storm trust II, that will not be taxable to Entergy Louisiana. Additionally, Entergy Louisiana will not include the receipt of the system restoration charges in taxable income because the right to receive the system restoration charges has been granted directly to the LURC, and Entergy Louisiana only acts as an agent to collect those charges on behalf of the LURC.



Accordingly, the securitization provides for a tax accounting permanent difference resulting in a net reduction of income tax expense of approximately $133 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions, by Entergy Louisiana. Entergy’s recognition of reduced income tax expense was offset by other tax charges resulting in a net reduction of income tax expense of $129 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions.

In recognition of its obligations related to an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the securitization regulatory proceeding, Entergy Louisiana recorded in first quarter 2023 a $103 million ($76 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect its obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with its customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the Entergy Louisiana March 2023 storm cost securitization.

Arkansas Corporate Income Tax Rate Change

In April 2023, Arkansas Act 532 reduced the Arkansas corporate income tax rate from 5.3% to 5.1%. As a result of the rate reduction, Entergy Arkansas accrued a regulatory liability for income taxes of approximately $8 million in the second quarter of 2023 including a gross-up for the treatment of income taxes in Entergy Arkansas’s retail and wholesale ratemaking formulas.


NOTE 11.  PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable


Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at SeptemberJune 30, 2017 are $2192023 were $499 million for Entergy, $28.6$113.2 million for Entergy Arkansas, $95.5$136.1 million for Entergy Louisiana, $7.2$66.8 million for Entergy Mississippi, $0.6

88

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
$8.5 million for Entergy New Orleans, $18.9$104.6 million for Entergy Texas, and $26.9$17.7 million for System Energy.  Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at December 31, 2016 are $2532022 were $459 million for Entergy, $40.9$93.2 million for Entergy Arkansas, $114.8$154.3 million for Entergy Louisiana, $11.5$59.5 million for Entergy Mississippi, $2.3$11.2 million for Entergy New Orleans, $9.3$68.9 million for Entergy Texas, and $6.2$29 million for System Energy.




NOTE 12.  VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities.entities (VIEs).  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facilities, and commercial paper borrowings, and long-term debt.
Entergy Louisiana was considered to hold a variable interest in the lessor from which it leased an undivided interest representing approximately 9.3% of the Waterford 3 nuclear plant. After Entergy Louisiana acquired a beneficial interest in the leased assets in March 2016, however, the lessor was no longer considered a variable interest entity. Entergy Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of $9.2 million through March 2016. See Note 106 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 3 to the financial statements herein for discussion of noncontrolling interests.

Restoration Law Trust I (the storm trust I), a discussiontrust consolidated by Entergy Louisiana, is a VIE and Entergy Louisiana is the primary beneficiary. As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the primary asset held by the storm trust I was $3.1 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, of outstanding Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests, which is reflected as an investment in affiliate preferred membership interests on the consolidated balance sheets of Entergy Louisiana. The LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust I is presented as noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets of Entergy and Entergy Louisiana, with balances of $32.4 million as of June 30, 2023 and $31.7 million as of December 31, 2022.

Restoration Law Trust II (the storm trust II), a trust consolidated by Entergy Louisiana, is a VIE and Entergy Louisiana is the primary beneficiary. The storm trust II was established as part of the March 2023 Act 293 securitization of Entergy Louisiana’s purchaseHurricane Ida restoration costs, less Hurricane Ida amounts previously financed in May 2022 in a prior securitization transaction. Entergy Louisiana is the primary beneficiary of the Waterford 3 leased assets.storm trust II because it was created to facilitate the financing of Entergy Louisiana’s storm restoration costs and Entergy Louisiana is entitled to receive a majority of the proceeds received by the storm trust II. As of June 30, 2023, the primary asset held by the storm trust II is the $1.5 billion of outstanding Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests, which is reflected as an investment in affiliate preferred membership interests on the consolidated balance sheets of Entergy Louisiana. The storm trust II’s investment in affiliate preferred membership interests was purchased with the net bond proceeds of the securitization bonds issued by the LCDA. After the securitization bonds were issued, the LCDA loaned the net bond proceeds to the LURC, and pursuant to Act 293, the LURC contributed the net bond proceeds to the storm trust II. The holders of the securitization bonds do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of the storm trust II or to any Entergy affiliate and the bonds are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets of Entergy or Entergy Louisiana. The LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust II is presented as noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets of Entergy and Entergy Louisiana, with a balance of $14.9 million as of June 30, 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the securitization bonds and the preferred membership interests.


System Energy is considered to hold a variable interest in the lessor from which it leases an undivided interest representing approximately 11.5% of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant. System Energy is the lessee under this arrangement, which is described in more detail in Note 105 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. System Energy made payments on its lease,under this arrangement, including interest, of $8.6 million in each of the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and $8.6the six months ended June 30, 2022.

AR Searcy Partnership, LLC is a tax equity partnership that qualifies as a VIE, which Entergy Arkansas is required to consolidate as it is the primary beneficiary. As of June 30, 2023, AR Searcy Partnership, LLC recorded assets equal to $137.6 million, primarily consisting of property, plant, and equipment, and the carrying value of Entergy Arkansas’s ownership interest in the three months ended September 30, 2016. System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest,partnership was approximately $110.8 million. As of $17.2December 31, 2022, AR Searcy Partnership, LLC recorded assets equal to $138.3 million, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $17.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.


NOTE 13.  ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS (Entergy Corporation)

Acquisitions

Palisades Purchase Power Agreement

As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy’s purchaseprimarily consisting of the Palisadesproperty, plant, in 2007 included a unit-contingent, 15-year purchased power agreement (PPA) with Consumers Energy for 100% of the plant’s output, excluding any future uprates. Prices under the PPA range from $43.50/MWh in 2007 to $61.50/MWh in 2022, and the average price under the PPA is $51/MWh. For the PPA, which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition, Entergy will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement. The amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the present value, calculated at the date of acquisition, of each year’s difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices.

88

89

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In December 2016,and equipment, and the carrying value of Entergy announced that it had reached an agreement with Consumers Energy to amend the existing PPA to terminate early, on May 31, 2018, subject to regulatory approvals. Entergy updated the liability amortization calculation to reflect the expected early termination of the PPA. In September 2017, Entergy and Consumers Energy terminated the PPA amendment agreement, and Entergy announced the decision to continue to operate the plant through the end of the PPA. Based on that decision, the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be approximately $2 million for the remainder of 2017, $6 million in 2018, $10 million in 2019, $11 million in 2020, and $12 million in 2021.

Dispositions

FitzPatrick

In March 2017 the NRC approved the sale of the FitzPatrick plant, an 838 MW nuclear power plant owned by EntergyArkansas’s ownership interest in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment, to Exelon.partnership was approximately $109 million. The transaction closed in March 2017 fortax equity investor’s ownership interest is recorded as noncontrolling interest.

MS Sunflower Partnership, LLC is a purchase price of $110 million, including the $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $16 million. At the transaction close, Exelon paid an additional $8 million for the proration of certain expenses prepaid by Entergy.

As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein,tax equity partnership that qualifies as a resultVIE, which Entergy Mississippi is required to consolidate as it is the primary beneficiary. As of the saleJune 30, 2023, MS Sunflower Partnership, LLC recorded assets equal to $163.5 million, primarily consisting of FitzPatrick on March 31, 2017, Entergy re-determined the plant’s tax basis, resulting in a $44 million income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.

The assets and liabilities associated with the sale of FitzPatrick to Exelon were classified as held for sale on Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. The disposition-date fair value of the decommissioning trust fund was $805 million, classified within other deferred debits, and the disposition-date fair value of the asset retirement obligation was $727 million, classified within other non-current liabilities. The transaction also included property, plant, and equipment, with a net bookand the carrying value of zero, materials and supplies, and prepaid assets.

As discussed in Note 14 to the financial statementsEntergy Mississippi’s ownership interest in the Form 10-K,partnership was approximately $126.4 million. As of December 31, 2022, MS Sunflower Partnership, LLC recorded assets equal to $154.5 million, primarily consisting of property, plant, and equipment, and the carrying value of Entergy entered into a reimbursement agreement with Exelon pursuant to which Exelon reimbursed Entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with Entergy’s operation of FitzPatrick. InMississippi’s ownership interest in the first quarter 2017, Entergy billed Exelon for reimbursement of $98 million of other operation and maintenance expenses, $7 million in lost operating revenues, and $3 million in taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by a $10 million defueling credit to Exelon.partnership was approximately $117.2 million. The tax equity investor’s ownership interest is recorded as noncontrolling interest.




NOTE 14.  ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS13.  REVENUE (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Operating Revenues

See Note 919 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. Following are updates to that discussion.revenue recognition.  Entergy’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:

20232022
(In Thousands)
Utility:
Residential$951,424 $1,035,063 
Commercial692,788 715,665 
Industrial750,177 878,194 
Governmental63,816 67,101 
Total billed retail2,458,205 2,696,023 
Sales for resale (a)68,262 249,035 
Other electric revenues (b)247,331 302,351 
Revenues from contracts with customers2,773,798 3,247,409 
Other Utility revenues (c)11,446 10,846 
Electric revenues2,785,244 3,258,255 
Natural gas revenues33,503 48,008 
Other revenues (d)27,279 88,933 
Total operating revenues$2,846,026 $3,395,196 
In the second quarter 2017, System Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a $35.9 million reduction in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related asset retirement cost asset that will be depreciated over the remaining life of the unit.

In the third quarter 2017, Entergy Wholesale Commodities recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for Palisades. The revised estimate resulted in a $68.7 million reduction in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the plant asset. The reduction in its estimated decommissioning cost liability resulted from the change in expectation regarding the timing of decommissioning cash flows due to the decision to continue to operate the plant until the spring of 2022.


89

90

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Utility:
Residential$1,992,883 $2,021,085 
Commercial1,407,089 1,350,290 
Industrial1,613,899 1,621,828 
Governmental131,153 124,395 
Total billed retail5,145,024 5,117,598 
Sales for resale (a)176,209 377,994 
Other electric revenues (b)291,788 396,231 
Revenues from contracts with customers5,613,021 5,891,823 
Other Utility revenues (c)55,633 22,208 
Electric revenues5,668,654 5,914,031 
Natural gas revenues98,084 120,369 
Other revenues (d)60,347 238,722 
Total operating revenues$5,827,085 $6,273,122 

The Utility operating companies’ total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Residential$204,808 $334,246 $163,001 $68,535 $180,834 
Commercial136,591 253,365 142,997 56,095 103,740 
Industrial153,817 407,045 54,738 7,562 127,015 
Governmental4,945 19,407 14,971 17,896 6,597 
Total billed retail500,161 1,014,063 375,707 150,088 418,186 
Sales for resale (a)48,266 80,248 26,073 11,075 1,986 
Other electric revenues (b)65,807 91,372 40,966 5,667 44,861 
Revenues from contracts with customers614,234 1,185,683 442,746 166,830 465,033 
Other revenues (c)2,113 6,226 2,384 1,386 (603)
Electric revenues616,347 1,191,909 445,130 168,216 464,430 
Natural gas revenues— 13,703 — 19,800 — 
Total operating revenues$616,347 $1,205,612 $445,130 $188,016 $464,430 

91

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Residential$199,209 $400,915 $143,705 $80,484 $210,750 
Commercial127,230 290,063 118,278 58,801 121,293 
Industrial135,809 536,229 43,738 9,216 153,202 
Governmental5,137 21,841 12,611 20,179 7,333 
Total billed retail467,385 1,249,048 318,332 168,680 492,578 
Sales for resale (a)156,754 123,231 43,524 36,825 18,133 
Other electric revenues (b)70,820 119,847 41,325 17,443 54,259 
Revenues from contracts with customers694,959 1,492,126 403,181 222,948 564,970 
Other revenues (c)1,980 5,816 2,278 1,136 (379)
Electric revenues696,939 1,497,942 405,459 224,084 564,591 
Natural gas revenues— 17,843 — 30,165 — 
Total operating revenues$696,939 $1,515,785 $405,459 $254,249 $564,591 

The Utility operating companies’ total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
2023Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Residential$444,307 $694,892 $332,390 $132,101 $389,193 
Commercial261,927 531,543 276,673 110,164 226,782 
Industrial285,053 916,949 106,153 14,975 290,769 
Governmental9,605 42,481 28,854 35,694 14,519 
Total billed retail1,000,892 2,185,865 744,070 292,934 921,263 
Sales for resale (a)114,283 163,484 64,816 35,985 4,431 
Other electric revenues (b)79,524 117,939 43,840 6,084 47,085 
Revenues from contracts with customers1,194,699 2,467,288 852,726 335,003 972,779 
Other revenues (c)4,397 44,373 4,832 2,908 (843)
Electric revenues1,199,096 2,511,661 857,558 337,911 971,936 
Natural gas revenues— 39,159 — 58,925 — 
Total operating revenues$1,199,096 $2,550,820 $857,558 $396,836 $971,936 


92

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2022Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Residential$426,995 $754,483 $296,643 $139,141 $403,823 
Commercial240,469 547,653 228,939 104,373 228,856 
Industrial245,483 988,182 82,895 15,490 289,778 
Governmental9,598 40,857 24,612 35,211 14,117 
Total billed retail922,545 2,331,175 633,089 294,215 936,574 
Sales for resale (a)227,167 230,932 65,165 63,365 35,778 
Other electric revenues (b)101,392 161,329 51,662 18,836 65,709 
Revenues from contracts with customers1,251,104 2,723,436 749,916 376,416 1,038,061 
Other revenues (c)4,791 11,743 4,572 2,314 (988)
Electric revenues1,255,895 2,735,179 754,488 378,730 1,037,073 
Natural gas revenues— 46,578 — 73,791 — 
Total operating revenues$1,255,895 $2,781,757 $754,488 $452,521 $1,037,073 

(a)Sales for resale includes day-ahead sales of energy in a market administered by an ISO. These sales represent financially binding commitments for the sale of physical energy the next day. These sales are adjusted to actual power generated and delivered in the real time market. Given the short duration of these transactions, Entergy does not consider them to be derivatives subject to fair value adjustments and includes them as part of customer revenues.
(b)Other electric revenues consist primarily of transmission and ancillary services provided to participants of an ISO-administered market, unbilled revenue, and certain customer credits as directed by regulators.
(c)Other Utility revenues include the equity component of carrying costs related to securitization, settlement of financial hedges, occasional sales of inventory, alternative revenue programs, provisions for revenue subject to refund, and late fees.
(d)Other revenues include competitive business sales including day-ahead sales of energy in a market administered by an ISO, operation and management services fees, and amortization of a below-market power purchase agreement.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects Entergy’s best estimate of expected losses on its accounts receivable balances. Due to the essential nature of utility services, Entergy has historically experienced a low rate of default on its accounts receivables. The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
EntergyEntergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2022$30.9 $6.5 $7.6 $2.5 $11.9 $2.4 
Provisions15.5 3.2 7.0 2.1 0.7 2.5 
Write-offs(51.5)(13.2)(21.4)(3.7)(6.5)(6.7)
Recoveries26.9 8.7 11.7 1.5 1.5 3.5 
Balance as of June 30, 2023$21.8 $5.2 $4.9 $2.4 $7.6 $1.7 

93

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
EntergyEntergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$68.6 $13.1 $29.2 $7.2 $13.3 $5.8 
Provisions (a)11.0 8.2 0.4 0.2 0.9 1.3 
Write-offs(75.5)(21.8)(29.8)(7.4)(10.4)(6.1)
Recoveries21.5 6.7 7.9 2.2 3.1 1.6 
Balance as of June 30, 2022$25.6 $6.2 $7.7 $2.2 $6.9 $2.6 

(a)Provisions include estimated incremental bad debt expenses, and revisions to those estimates, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic of ($8.9) million for Entergy, $3.9 million for Entergy Arkansas, ($8.5) million for Entergy Louisiana, ($3.0) million for Entergy New Orleans, and ($1.3) million for Entergy Texas that have been deferred as regulatory assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the COVID-19 orders issued by retail regulators.

The allowance for currently expected credit losses is calculated as the historical rate of customer write-offs multiplied by the current accounts receivable balance, taking into account the length of time the receivable balances have been outstanding. The rate of customer write-offs has historically experienced minimal variation, although general economic conditions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or other economic hardships, can affect the rate of customer write-offs. Management monitors the current condition of individual customer accounts to manage collections and ensure bad debt expense is recorded in a timely manner.

________________


In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Entergy’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with peak periods occurring typically during the first and third quarters.  The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.





Part I, Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


See the Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis.


Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures


Disclosure Controls and Procedures


As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually(each individually a “Registrant” and collectively the “Registrants”) management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of

94

1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Changes in Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting


Under the supervision and with the participation of each Registrants’Registrant’s management, including its respective PEO and PFO, each Registrant evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.





95


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022

Net income increased $3.8 million primarily due to higher retail electric price and lower other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower volume/weather, higher interest expense, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Net income decreased $17.5$2.3 million primarily due to lower net revenue,volume/weather, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, a higher effective income tax rate,interest expense, and higher taxes other than income taxes,depreciation and amortization expenses, partially offset by higher retail electric price, lower other operation and maintenance expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income decreased $17.8 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, a higher effective income tax rate, higher taxes other than income taxes, and lower net revenue, partially offset by higher other income.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:

2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$696.9 
$496.3
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(24.6(90.6))
Volume/weather(8.6)
Retail electric price9.718.6 
Other0.4
2017 net revenue2023 operating revenues
$616.3
$481.8

Entergy Arkansas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of 168 GWh, or 9%, in industrial usage primarily due to a new customer in the primary metals industry.sales.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation ofan increase in formula rate plan rates as approved by the APSC, effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective January 2017.2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the 2022 formula rate plan filing.




92

96

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Total electric energy sales for Entergy Arkansas for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
Nine
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential1,767 1,820 (3)
Commercial1,374 1,383 (1)
Industrial2,226 2,135 
Governmental49 56 (13)
  Total retail5,416 5,394 — 
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies512 450 14 
  Non-associated companies811 2,010 (60)
Total6,739 7,854 (14)

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s operating revenues.

Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016:

2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$1,255.9 
$1,183.7
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(40.0(64.8))
Asset retirement obligationVolume/weather(11.1(30.0))
Opportunity sales7.5
Retail electric price34.138.0 
Other4.4
2017 net revenue2023 operating revenues
$1,199.1
$1,178.6

Entergy Arkansas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of 520 GWh, or 10%, in industrial usage primarily due to a new customer in the primary metals industry..
The asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because Entergy Arkansas records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue. The variance is primarily caused by a decrease in regulatory credits because of an increase in decommissioning trust earnings, including portfolio rebalancing for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.

The opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect recorded in the first quarter 2016 in connection with the FERC orders issued in April 2016 in the opportunity sales proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation ofan increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017 and an increase in base rates effective February 24, 2016, each as approved by the APSC. A significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016. The increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective April 2016 and January 2017.2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case and2022 formula rate plan filings. filing.


97

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Total electric energy sales for Entergy Arkansas for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential3,569 3,912 (9)
Commercial2,613 2,690 (3)
Industrial4,276 4,106 
Governmental95 111 (14)
  Total retail10,553 10,819 (2)
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies1,075 936 15 
  Non-associated companies2,379 3,401 (30)
Total14,007 15,156 (8)

See Note 1413 to the financial statements in the Form 10-Kherein for additional discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.Entergy Arkansas’s operating revenues.


Other Income Statement Variances


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022

Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to the amortization of higher costs associated with the most recent outages compared to previous outages.


Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:


a decrease of $8.8$5.6 million in nuclearcompensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023 and a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $4.6 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including a lower scope of work performed during plant outages, performed in the third quarter 20172023 as compared to the third quarter 2016,prior year; and
a decrease of $3.4 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $3.4 million in power delivery expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costsvegetation maintenance costs.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to positionincreases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and increases in local franchise taxes.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to changes in decommissioning trust fund activity and an increase in the nuclear fleetallowance for equity funds used during construction due to meet its operational goals.higher construction work in progress in 2023.


Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds in January 2023.

93

98

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals;
a decrease of $5.2 million in fossil-fueled generationOther operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs; andto:
a decrease of $4.2 million in energy efficiency costs, including $4.6 million in credits received in the third quarter 2017 related to incentives recognized as a result of participation in energy efficiency programs, and
the effects of true upsrecording a final judgment in first quarter 2023 to resolve claims in the energy efficiency filings in September 2017 for fixed costs to be collected from customers.

The decrease was partially offset by:

the effect of recording in July 2016 the final court decision in a lawsuitANO damages case against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded includedinclude the reimbursement of $5.5approximately $10.3 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense.expenses. See Note 81 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation;
a decrease of $10.3 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023, a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities, and a revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s spent nuclear fuel litigation;pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $5.8 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO; and
a decrease of $4.4 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to prior year.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.1$10 million in transmission and distributionpower delivery expenses primarily due to higher vegetation maintenance costs.

Taxes other than income taxes increasedcosts and higher reliability costs and an increase of $7.8 million in insurance expenses primarily due to an increaselower nuclear insurance refunds received in ad valorem taxes primarily due to higher assessments and higher millage rates.2023.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to the amortization of higher costs associated with the most recent outages compared to previous outages.


Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $24.9 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a decrease in regulatory compliance costs as compared to the prior year, partially offset by higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor,to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals;
a decrease of $7.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs; and
a decrease of $7 million in energy efficiency costs, including $4.6 million in credits received in the third quarter 2017 related to incentives recognized as a result of participation in energy efficiency programs, and the effects of true ups to the energy efficiency filings in September 2017 for fixed costs to be collected from customers.

The decrease was partially offset by:

the deferral in the first quarter 2016 of $7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO post-Fukushima compliance and $9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO flood barrier compliance, as approved by the APSC as part of the 2015 rate case settlement. These costs are being amortized over a ten-year period beginning March 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case settlement;

94

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

an increase of $11 million in transmission and distribution expenses primarily due to higher vegetation maintenance costs and higher labor costs, including contract labor;
the effect of recording in July 2016 the final court decision in a lawsuit against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement of $5.5 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense. See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s spent nuclear fuel litigation; and
an increase of $3.2 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2016.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes primarilythe allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher assessmentsconstruction work in progress in 2023 and higher millage rates.interest earned on money pool investments.


Depreciation and amortization expensesInterest expense increased primarily due to additions to plantthe issuance of $425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds in service, including Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station purchased in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.January 2023.

Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio rebalancing for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was 39%22.9% for the thirdsecond quarter 2017.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes.taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.


The effective income tax rate was 39.4%19.4% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to the amortization of state accumulated deferred income taxes as a result of tax rate changes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowanceaccrual for equity funds used during construction.state income taxes.


The effective income tax rate was 36.1%rates were 21.9% for the thirdsecond quarter 2016.2022 and 22.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The differencedifferences in the effective income tax raterates for the thirdsecond quarter 20162022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was21% were primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.

The effective income tax rate was 37.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accountingitems.


99

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and bookSubsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.Analysis
Income Tax Legislation

ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC ReviewsIncome Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews,Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and the deferralRegulation” section of replacement power costs.

95

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flow


Cash flows for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows:
 20232022
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$5,278 $12,915 
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities407,699 386,522 
Investing activities(563,854)(376,810)
Financing activities155,090 35,642 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(1,065)45,354 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$4,213 $58,269 
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$20,509
 
$9,135
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):

  
Operating activities367,551
 473,800
Investing activities(667,841) (774,210)
Financing activities280,245
 294,686
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(20,045) (5,724)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$464
 
$3,411


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $106.2increased $21.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to:

higher collections from customers;
lower fuel costs and the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs. See Note 2 to an increasethe financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of $46.1fuel and purchased power cost recovery;
the refund of $41.7 millionreceived from System Energy in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed with the FERC. The refund was subsequently applied to the under-recovered deferred fuel balance. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of these refunds and the related proceedings; and
$23.2 million in spending onproceeds received from the DOE in April 2023 resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear refueling outages in 2017,fuel storage costs that were previously expensed. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation.

The increase was partially offset by the timing of payments to vendors and a decrease in net income.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $106.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016 for approximately $237 million and a decrease of $36.9 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in 2017. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.

The decrease was partially offset by:

$66 million in funds held on deposit for principal and interest payments due October 1, 2017;
an increase in spending of $61.6$26.2 million on nuclear refueling outages in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various nuclear projects in 2017;2023.
an increase of $22.9 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various projects in 2017;
an increase of $21 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various projects in 2017; and
an increase of $18.6 million in information technology construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on substation circuit replacement.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $14.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to:

a $200 million capital contribution received from Entergy Corporation in March 2016 primarily in anticipation of Entergy Arkansas’s purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station; and


96

100

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $187 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

an increase of $80.9 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to higher capital expenditures for storm restoration in 2023 and increased investment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy Arkansas’s distribution system;
an increase of $57.8 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to increased investment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy Arkansas’s transmission system;
an increase of $40.2 million as a result of fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity primarily due to variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements, materials and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
an increase of $31 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2023.

The increase was partially offset by $17.9 million in proceeds received from the DOE in April 2023 resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously recorded as plant. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities increased $119.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

the issuance of $425 million of 5.15% Series mortgage bonds in January 2023;
net borrowings of $23.3$97.5 million in 2023 compared to net borrowings of $7.2 million in 2022 on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entityentity’s credit facility in 2017 compared to net borrowings of $35.7 million in 2016.facility; and

money pool activity.

The decreaseincrease was partially offset by:


the netrepayment, at maturity, of $250 million of 3.05% Series mortgage bonds in June 2023;
the issuance of $215.9$200 million of long-term debt4.20% Series mortgage bonds in 2017 as comparedMarch 2022; and
an increase of $53 million in common equity distributions paid in 2023 in order to the net issuance of $156.1 million of long-term debt in 2016;maintain Entergy Arkansas’s capital structure.
the redemptions of $75 million of 6.45% Series preferred stock and $10 million of 6.08% Series preferred stock in 2016; and
money pool activity.

IncreasesDecreases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a sourceuse of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool increased by $43.9decreased $28.5 million in 2017for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to decreasing by $3.7$139.9 million in 2016.for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.



101

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure


Entergy Arkansas’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Arkansas is primarily due to the net issuance of long-term debt in 2023.

June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital53.8 %52.5 %
Effect of subtracting cash— %— %
Net debt to net capital (non-GAAP)53.8 %52.5 %
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital55.8% 55.3%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds(0.3%) (0.4%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)55.5% 54.9%
Effect of subtracting cash% (0.2%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)55.5% 54.7%

(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings, finance lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Arkansas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bondsratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provideit provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recoursecondition.  The net debt to Entergy Arkansas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.net capital ratio is a non-GAAP measure. Entergy Arkansas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Arkansas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resourcesin the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.


97

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Arkansas is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $2.1 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investments in ANO 1 and 2; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy Arkansas’s payables toreceivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
2022
December 31,
2021
(In Thousands)
($152,327)($180,795)$6,216($139,904)
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$95,114 $51,232 $49,073 $52,742


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.


Entergy Arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in August 2022.June 2028. Entergy Arkansas also has a $20$25 million credit facility scheduled to expire in April 2018.2024. The $150 million credit facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against 50%$5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were no$75 million in cash borrowings outstanding under the $150 million credit facility and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities. In addition, Entergy Arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, a $22023, $11.6 million letterin letters of credit waswere outstanding under Entergy Arkansas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additionalfurther discussion of the credit facilities.


The Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $80 million scheduled to expire in May 2019.June 2025.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $8.3 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $152023, $22.5 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additionalfurther discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.


102

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Walnut Bend Solar

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2021, the APSC directed Entergy Arkansas to file a report within 180 days detailing its efforts to obtain a tax equity partnership for the purpose of acquiring the Walnut Bend Solar facility. In January 2022, Entergy Arkansas filed its tax equity partnership status report and will file subsequent reports until a tax equity partnership is obtained or a tax equity partnership is no longer sought. The counter-party notified Entergy Arkansas that it was terminating the project, though it was willing to consider an alternative for the site. Entergy Arkansas disputed the right of termination. Negotiations were conducted, including with respect to cost and schedule and to updates arising as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. In April 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed an application for an amended certificate of environmental compatibility and public need with the APSC seeking approval by June 2023 for the updates to the cost and schedule that were previously approved by the APSC. In June 2023, Entergy Arkansas, the APSC general staff, and the Arkansas Attorney General filed a unanimous settlement supporting that the approval of the Walnut Bend Solar facility is in the public interest based on the terms in the settlement, which relate in part to certain treatment for the production tax credits associated with the facility. In July 2023, after requesting further testimony and purporting to modify several terms in the settlement and upon rehearing, the APSC approved the settlement largely on the terms submitted, including a 30-year amortization period for the production tax credits. The project is currently expected to achieve commercial operation in 2024.

West Memphis Solar

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2021 the APSC directed Entergy Arkansas to file a report within 180 days detailing its efforts to obtain a tax equity partnership for the purpose of acquiring the West Memphis Solar facility. In April 2022, Entergy Arkansas filed its tax equity partnership status report and will file subsequent reports until a tax equity partnership is obtained or a tax equity partnership is no longer sought. Closing had been expected to occur in 2023. In March 2022 the counter-party notified Entergy Arkansas that it was seeking changes to certain terms of the build-own-transfer agreement, including both cost and schedule. In January 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed a supplemental application with the APSC seeking approval for a change in the transmission route and updates to the cost and schedule that were previously approved by the APSC. In March 2023 the APSC approved Entergy Arkansas’s supplemental application. The project is currently expected to achieve commercial operation in 2024.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recoveryin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery.  The following are updates to that discussion.


Retail Rates


20162023 Formula Rate Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Arkansas is required to make a supplemental filing supporting the recovery of certain nuclear costs. In April 2017,July 2023, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion consented to by all parties requesting that it be permitted to submitwith the APSC its supplemental filing in conjunction with its 20172023 formula rate plan filing which was subsequently made in July 2017 and is discussed below. In May 2017to set its formula rate for the APSC approved the joint motion and proposal to review2024 calendar year. The filing contained an evaluation of Entergy Arkansas’s supplementalearnings for the projected year 2024 and a netting adjustment for the historical year 2022. The filing showed that Entergy Arkansas’s earned rate of return on common equity for the 2024 projected year is 8.11% resulting in a concurrent schedule withrevenue deficiency of $80.5 million. The earned rate of return on common equity for the 20172022 historical year was 7.29% resulting in a $49.8 million netting adjustment. The total proposed revenue change for the 2024 projected year and 2022 historical year netting adjustment is $130.3 million. By operation of the formula rate plan, filing. In doing so, however,Entergy Arkansas’s recovery of the APSC noted thatrevenue requirement is subject to a determination of whetherfour percent annual revenue constraint. Because Entergy Arkansas’s revenue requirement in this filing exceeded the supplemental information supporting certain nuclear expenditures will be considered inconstraint, the hearing for the 2017 formula rate plan filing or a separate hearing will be made at a later time. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the partiesresulting increase is limited to the proceeding filed a joint motion to$88.6 million.


98

103

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

approve a unanimous settlement agreement resolving all issues in the docket and providing for recovery of the 2017 and 2018 nuclear costs.

2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In July 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 2017 formula rate plan filing showing Entergy Arkansas’s projected earned return on common equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 test period to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth.  The filing projected a $129.7 million revenue requirement increase to achieve Entergy Arkansas’s target earned return on common equity of 9.75%.  Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan is subject to a four percent annual revenue constraint and the projected annual revenue requirement increase exceeds the four percent, resulting in a proposed increase for the 2017 formula rate plan of $70.9 million. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC revised formula rate plan attachments that projected a $126.2 million revenue requirement increase based on acceptance of certain adjustments and recommendations made by the APSC staff and other intervenors. The revised formula rate plan filing included a proposed $71.1 million revenue requirement increase based on a revision to the four percent cap calculation. In October 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties to the proceeding filed a joint motion to approve a unanimous settlement agreement resolving all issues in the docket and providing for recovery of the 2017 and 2018 nuclear costs. The settlement agreement does not affect Entergy Arkansas’s proposed $71.1 million revenue requirement increase. If a final order is not issued by December 13, 2017, the proposed formula rate plan adjustment will become effective January 2, 2018, subject to refund.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016, Entergy Arkansas filed an application seeking a finding from the APSC that Entergy Arkansas’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In June 2017 the APSC staff and Arkansas Attorney General filed direct testimony. The APSC staff generally supported Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment conditioned on various recommendations. The Arkansas Attorney General’s consultant primarily recommended denial of Entergy Arkansas’s application but alternatively suggested recommendations in the event the APSC approves Entergy Arkansas’s proposal. Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony in June 2017, substantially accepting the APSC staff’s recommendations. In August 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties to the proceeding filed a joint motion to approve a unanimous settlement agreement. Also in August 2017 supplemental testimony was filed and a settlement hearing was held. In October 2017 the APSC issued an order finding that Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment is in the public interest and approving the settlement agreement subject to a minor modification. Entergy Arkansas expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset to be amortized over 15 years.
Energy Cost Recovery Rider


In March 2017,2023, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the rate from $0.01164$0.01639 per kWh to $0.01547$0.01883 per kWh. The primary reason for the rate increase is a large under-recovered balance as a result of higher natural gas prices in 2022 and a $32 million deferral related to the 2021 February winter storms consistent with APSC staffgeneral staff’s request in 2022. The under-recovered balance included in the filing was partially offset by the proceeds of the $41.7 million refund that System Energy made to Entergy Arkansas in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed testimony in March 2017 recommending thatwith the FERC. The redetermined rate should be implementedof $0.01883 per kWh became effective with the first billing cycle ofin April 2017 under2023 through the normal operation of the tariff. Accordingly, the redetermined rate went into effect on March 31, 2017 pursuantSee Note 2 to the tariff. In July 2017financial statements in the Arkansas Attorney General requested additionalForm 10-K for information to support certain ofon the costs included in Entergy Arkansas’s 2017 energy cost rate redetermination.2021 February winter storm investigation proceeding.


Opportunity Sales ProceedingsProceeding


See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Entergy Arkansas opportunity sales proceeding. As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2023, Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc., an industrial customer association, filed a notice of appeal of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas’s order denying its motion to intervene to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and a motion with the district court to stay the proceedings pending the appeal, which was denied. In February 2023, Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District to stay the proceedings pending the appeal, which also was denied. The trial was held in February 2023. Following the trial, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District to expedite the appeal filed by Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. The court granted Entergy Arkansas’s request, and oral arguments were held in June 2023. An order from the court is expected in 2023.

Net Metering Legislation

As discussed in the Form 10-K, an Arkansas law was enacted effective July 2019 that, among other things, expands the definition of a “net metering customer” to include two additional types of customers: (1) customers that lease net metering facilities, subject to certain leasing arrangements, and (2) government entities or other entities exempt from state and federal income taxes that enter into a service contract for a net metering facility. The latter provision allows eligible entities, many of whom are small and large general service customers, to purchase renewable energy directly from third party providers and receive bill credits for these purchases. The APSC was given authority under this law to address certain matters, such as cost shifting and the appropriate compensation for net metered energy and initiated proceedings for this purpose. Because of the size and number of customers eligible under this new law, there is a risk of loss of load and the shifting of costs to customers. A hearing was held in December 2019, with utilities, including Entergy Arkansas, cooperatives, the Arkansas Attorney General, and industrial customers advocating the need for establishment of a reasonable rate structure that takes into account impacts to non-net metering customers; an additional hearing was conducted in February 2020 for purposes of public comment only. The APSC issued an order in June 20092020, and in July 2020 several parties, including Entergy Arkansas, filed for rehearing on multiple grounds, including for the LPSCreasons that it imposes an unreasonable rate structure and allows facilities to net meter that do not meet the statutory definition of net metering facilities. After granting the rehearing requests, the APSC issued an order in September 2020 largely upholding its June 2020 order. In October 2020, Entergy Arkansas and several other parties filed an appeal of the APSC’s September 2020 order. In January 2021, Entergy Arkansas, pursuant to an APSC order, filed an updated net metering tariff, which was approved in February 2021. In May 2021, Entergy Arkansas filed a complaint requesting thatmotion to dismiss its pending judicial appeal of the FERC determine that certainAPSC’s September 2020 order on rehearing in the proceeding addressing its net metering rules. In June 2021 the Arkansas Court of Appeals granted the motion and dismissed Entergy Arkansas’s sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisionsappeal, although other appeals of the System Agreement that allocatedSeptember 2020 APSC order remained before the energy generated by Entergy System resources, (b) imprudently deniedcourt. In May 2022 the Entergy Systemcourt issued an order affirming the APSC’s decision in part and its ultimate consumersreversing in part. In June 2022 the benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violatedAPSC sought rehearing from the provision of the System Agreement that prohibited sales to third parties by individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-

court with respect
99

104

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

to the court’s ruling on a grid charge, which the court of appeals denied in July 2022. One of the cooperative appellants filed a further appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court in July 2022, which the court decided not to hear.
first-refusal to other Utility operating companies.  The LPSC’s complaint challenges sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds.


In April 2016August 2022 the FERCAPSC opened a rulemaking concerning proposed amendments to the net metering rules to address the expiration on December 31, 2022 of the automatic grandfathering of the existing net metering rate structure. Entergy Arkansas and other utility parties filed initial briefs and comments setting forth that the statute imposing the expiration of the automatic grandfathering is not ambiguous and that the APSC does not have the authority to extend the grandfathering period, and the hearing was held in October 2022. In December 2022 the APSC issued orders addressing requestsan order attempting to modify the net metering rules and purporting to allow for rehearingthe potential for grandfathering after December 31, 2022. More than thirty applicants filed individual net metering applications in July 2012 andDecember 2022 seeking to be considered under the APSC’s order, although the APSC issued an ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The first order denies Entergy’s request forin January 2023 holding those applications in abeyance. Several parties, including Entergy Arkansas, sought rehearing, and affirms FERC’s earlier rulings that Entergy’s original methodology for allocating energy coststhe Arkansas’s Governor’s executive order limiting new rulemakings calls into question how the APSC’s order to adopt new rules may be effectuated.

Also in September 2022 the opportunity sales was incorrect and, as a result, Entergy Arkansas must make paymentsAPSC opened another proceeding to investigate the other Utility operating companies to put them in the same position that they would have been in absent the incorrect allocation. The FERC clarified that interest should be included with the payments. The second order affirmed in part, and reversed in part, the rulings in the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision regarding the methodology that should be used to calculate the payments Entergy Arkansas is to make to the other Utility operating companies. The FERC affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that a full re-runissue of intra-system bills should be performed, but required that methodology be modified so that the sales have the same priority for purposes of energy allocation as joint account sales. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision that any payments by Entergy Arkansas should be reduced by 20%. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that adjustments to other System Agreement service schedules and excess bandwidth payments should not be taken into account when calculating the payments to be made by Entergy Arkansas. The FERC held that such adjustments and excess bandwidth payments should be taken into account, but ordered further proceedings before an ALJ to address whether a cap on any reduction due to bandwidth payments was necessary and to implement the other adjustments to the calculation methodology.

In May 2016, Entergy Services filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order arguing that payments made by Entergy Arkansas should be reducedpotential cost shifting arising as a result of net metering. Investor owned utilities and some cooperatives were required to make and did make filings in October 2022 with supporting documentation as to the timingamount and extent of cost shifting and the manner in which they would design tariffs to recover those costs on behalf of non-net metering customers. Responses to the utility and cooperative filings were filed in January 2023, and utilities filed their further responses in February 2023.

An Arkansas law was enacted effective March 2023 that revises the billing arrangements for net metering facilities in order to reduce the cost shift to non-net metering customers. The new law also imposes a new limit of 5 MW for future net metering facilities, allows utilities to recover net metering credits in the same manner as fuel, and grandfathers certain net metering facilities that are online or in process to be online by September 2024. Entergy Arkansas joined other utilities in a motion in April 2023 to close the current APSC docket related to potential cost shifting in light of the LPSC’s approvalnew law, and the APSC also canceled the remaining procedural schedule in this docket in April 2023. Because of certain contracts.the new law, in May 2023, the APSC also closed the grandfathering rulemaking that it opened in August 2022. Under the new law, the APSC must approve revisions to the utilities’ tariffs to conform to the new law no later than December 2023. The APSC opened a new rulemaking in April 2023 to consider implementation of the new law and tariffs.

COVID-19 Orders

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of APSC orders issued in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. In its 2023 formula rate plan filing, Entergy Services alsoArkansas proposed to amortize the COVID-19 regulatory asset over a ten-year period. As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Arkansas had a regulatory asset of $39 million for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Power Through Program

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2021, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC an application seeking authority for a Power Through offering to deploy natural gas-fired distributed generation. In December 2021 the APSC general staff requested briefing, which Entergy Arkansas opposed. In January 2022, Entergy Arkansas filed to support the establishment of a procedural schedule with a hearing in April 2022. Also in January 2022, the APSC granted the general staff’s request for clarification and/or rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The APSC and the LPSC also filed requests for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order. In September 2017 the FERC issuedbriefing but on an order denying the request for rehearing on the issue of whether any payments by Entergy Arkansas to the other Utility operating companies should be reduced due to the timing of the LPSC’s approval of Entergy Arkansas’s wholesale baseload contract with Entergy Louisiana.

Pursuant to the procedural schedule establishedexpedited schedule; briefing concluded in the case, Entergy Services re-ran intra-system bills for the ten-year period 2000-2009 to quantify the effects of the FERC's ruling. In November 2016 the LPSC submitted testimony disputing certain aspects of the calculations, and Entergy Services submitted answering testimony in January 2017. In February 2017 the FERC staff filed testimony and Entergy Services filed responsive testimony. In March 2017 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony.2022. A paper hearing was held in May 2017. In July 2017 the ALJ issued an initial decision concluding thatAugust and September 2022 with Entergy Arkansas should pay $86 million plus interestresponding to the other Utility operating companies.several written commissioner questions. In August 2017 the Utility operating companies, the LPSC,May 2023 the APSC approved the Power Through offering with some modifications, and FERC staff filed individual briefs on exceptions challenging various aspectsin June 2023, Entergy Arkansas sought rehearing or clarification of the initial decision. In September 2017 the Utility operating companies, the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, the City Council,several issues. See “Property and FERC staff filed separate briefs opposing exceptions taken by various parties. The case is pending before the FERC. No payments will be made or received by the Utility operating companies until the FERC issues an order reviewing the initial decision and Entergy submits a subsequent filing to comply with that order.

The effect of the FERC’s decisions thus farOther Generation Resources -Other Generation Resources - Power Through Programs” in Part I, Item 1 in the case would be that Entergy Arkansas will make paymentsForm 10-K for further discussion related to some or all of the other Utility operating companies.  Because further proceedings will still occur in the case, the amount and recipients of payments by Entergy Arkansas are unknown at this time.  Based on testimony previously submitted in the case and its assessment of the April 2016 FERC orders, in the first quarter 2016, Entergy Arkansas recorded a liability of $87 million, which includes interest, for its estimated increased costs and payment to the other Utility operating companies.  This estimate is subject to change depending on how the FERC resolves the issues that are still outstanding in the case, including its review of the July 2017 initial decision.  Entergy Arkansas’s increased costs will be attributed to Entergy Arkansas’s retail and wholesale businesses, and it is not probable that Entergy Arkansas will recover the wholesale portion.  Entergy Arkansas, therefore, recorded a regulatory asset in the first quarter 2016 of approximately $75 million, which represents its estimate of the retail portion of the costs.


program.
100

105

Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Remaining Useful Lives Review

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in response to 2021 legislation, in December 2021 the APSC opened a proceeding to establish a procedure to evaluate life extensions of all utility generation units and in December 2022 opened a separate docket to evaluate life extensions for White Bluff, Independence, and the Lake Catherine plant. In January 2023, Entergy Arkansas and one other party filed for rehearing of the order in the general proceeding, and Entergy Arkansas moved to dismiss the separate docket. In February 2023 the APSC granted rehearing in the general proceeding. A new law passed in April 2023 changed the requirements for the APSC to perform these evaluations, thus eliminating the need for the current APSC proceedings, and the APSC cancelled the procedural schedule in the separate docket. In June 2023 the APSC also closed the general proceeding because of the new law. See “Regulation of Entergy’s Business - Environmental Regulation -National Ambient Air Quality Standards - Regional Haze” in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for further discussion related to these plants.

Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric 
$673,226
 
$654,599
 
$1,644,239
 
$1,624,224
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 133,254
 105,147
 283,354
 274,106
Purchased power 63,423
 52,023
 193,108
 163,541
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 22,988
 14,554
 59,942
 44,604
Other operation and maintenance 175,013
 187,294
 512,691
 514,109
Decommissioning 14,320
 13,504
 42,321
 39,908
Taxes other than income taxes 29,259
 24,931
 78,438
 70,978
Depreciation and amortization 70,433
 67,309
 206,586
 197,597
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net (5,219) 1,177
 (10,797) 2,896
TOTAL 503,471
 465,939
 1,365,643
 1,307,739
         
OPERATING INCOME 169,755
 188,660
 278,596
 316,485
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 4,140
 3,734
 13,922
 12,661
Interest and investment income 6,738
 5,410
 27,865
 14,774
Miscellaneous - net 183
 812
 19
 (983)
TOTAL 11,061
 9,956
 41,806
 26,452
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 31,010
 28,152
 86,776
 88,726
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1,944) (2,000) (6,458) (6,851)
TOTAL 29,066
 26,152
 80,318
 81,875
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 151,750
 172,464
 240,084
 261,062
         
Income taxes 59,112
 62,316
 94,592
 97,729
         
NET INCOME 92,638
 110,148
 145,492
 163,333
         
Preferred dividend requirements 357
 1,476
 1,071
 4,913
         
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$92,281
 
$108,672
 
$144,421
 
$158,420
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$145,492
 
$163,333
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 311,725
 319,845
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 78,390
 163,202
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (45,180) (116,584)
Fuel inventory 10,089
 28,968
Accounts payable (78,396) 95,116
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 15,367
 (78,879)
Interest accrued 12,436
 5,909
Deferred fuel costs (53,664) (50,687)
Other working capital accounts (6,762) 4,259
Provisions for estimated losses 10,094
 130
Other regulatory assets (4,680) (5,680)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (73,107) (77,823)
Other assets and liabilities 45,747
 22,691
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 367,551
 473,800
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (558,985) (494,071)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 14,521
 13,134
Payment for purchase of plant 
 (237,324)
Nuclear fuel purchases (95,289) (80,716)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel 51,029
 40,336
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 219,223
 165,038
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (228,740) (176,981)
Changes in securitization account (3,619) (3,524)
Change in other investments (65,981) 
Other 
 (102)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (667,841) (774,210)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 222,717
 777,671
Retirement of long-term debt (6,803) (621,608)
Capital contribution from parent
 
 200,000
Redemption of preferred stock 
 (85,283)
Changes in short-term borrowings - net 23,257
 35,717
Changes in money pool payable - net 43,882
 (3,669)
Dividends paid:    
Preferred stock (1,071) (6,274)
Other (1,737) (1,868)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 280,245
 294,686
     
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (20,045) (5,724)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 20,509
 9,135
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$464
 
$3,411
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$70,321
 
$78,500
Income taxes 
$—
 
$7,242
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$127
 
$20,174
Temporary cash investments 337
 335
Total cash and cash equivalents 464
 20,509
Securitization recovery trust account 7,759
 4,140
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 140,147
 102,229
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,531) (1,211)
Associated companies 35,455
 35,286
Other 52,109
 58,153
Accrued unbilled revenues 113,650
 100,193
Total accounts receivable 339,830
 294,650
Deferred fuel costs 150,206
 96,690
Fuel inventory - at average cost 22,671
 32,760
Materials and supplies - at average cost 191,199
 182,600
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 80,769
 81,313
Prepayments and other 81,322
 14,293
TOTAL 874,220
 726,955
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Decommissioning trust funds 910,369
 834,735
Other 3,162
 7,912
TOTAL 913,531
 842,647
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 10,823,675
 10,488,060
Property under capital lease 598
 716
Construction work in progress 365,938
 304,073
Nuclear fuel 236,447
 307,352
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 11,426,658
 11,100,201
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 4,721,860
 4,635,885
UTILITY PLANT - NET 6,704,798
 6,464,316
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 67,228
 62,646
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $31,448 as of September 30, 2017 and $41,164 as of December 31, 2016) 1,428,127
 1,428,029
Deferred fuel costs 67,046
 66,898
Other 16,126
 14,626
TOTAL 1,578,527
 1,572,199
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$10,071,076
 
$9,606,117
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$114,700
 
$114,700
Short-term borrowings 8,257
 
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 237,246
 239,711
Other 142,160
 185,153
Customer deposits 97,432
 97,512
Taxes accrued 22,561
 7,194
Interest accrued 29,016
 16,580
Other 34,329
 36,557
TOTAL 685,701
 697,407
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 2,265,375
 2,186,623
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 34,404
 35,305
Other regulatory liabilities 349,380
 305,907
Decommissioning 966,674
 924,353
Accumulated provisions 28,776
 18,682
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 351,046
 424,234
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $41,578 as of September 30, 2017 and $48,139 as of December 31, 2016) 2,948,610
 2,715,085
Other 12,022
 13,854
TOTAL 6,956,287
 6,624,043
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
Preferred stock without sinking fund 31,350
 31,350
     
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2017 and 2016 470
 470
Paid-in capital 790,243
 790,243
Retained earnings 1,607,025
 1,462,604
TOTAL 2,397,738
 2,253,317
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$10,071,076
 
$9,606,117
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Common Equity  
  Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Total
  (In Thousands)
         
Balance at December 31, 2015 
$470
 
$588,493
 
$1,302,695
 
$1,891,658
         
Net income 
 
 163,333
 163,333
Capital contribution from parent 
 200,000
 
 200,000
Capital stock redemption 
 1,750
 (2,034) (284)
Preferred stock dividends 
 
 (4,913) (4,913)
         
Balance at September 30, 2016 
$470
 
$790,243
 
$1,459,081
 
$2,249,794
         
         
Balance at December 31, 2016 
$470
 
$790,243
 
$1,462,604
 
$2,253,317
         
Net income 
 
 145,492
 145,492
Preferred stock dividends 
 
 (1,071) (1,071)
         
Balance at September 30, 2017 
$470
 
$790,243
 
$1,607,025
 
$2,397,738
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:      
Residential 
$254
 
$275
 
($21) (8)
Commercial 150
 151
 (1) (1)
Industrial 145
 137
 8
 6
Governmental 6
 5
 1
 20
Total retail 555
 568
 (13) (2)
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 33
 26
 7
 27
Non-associated companies 45
 30
 15
 50
Other 40
 31
 9
 29
Total 
$673
 
$655
 
$18
 3
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 2,236
 2,485
 (249) (10)
Commercial 1,723
 1,822
 (99) (5)
Industrial 2,074
 1,906
 168
 9
Governmental 67
 68
 (1) (1)
Total retail 6,100
 6,281
 (181) (3)
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 483
 463
 20
 4
Non-associated companies 2,026
 1,632
 394
 24
Total 8,609
 8,376
 233
 3
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:      
Residential 
$597
 
$620
 
($23) (4)
Commercial 375
 376
 (1) 
Industrial 355
 337
 18
 5
Governmental 15
 13
 2
 15
Total retail 1,342
 1,346
 (4) 
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 96
 19
 77
 405
Non-associated companies 96
 105
 (9) (9)
Other 110
 154
 (44) (29)
Total 
$1,644
 
$1,624
 
$20
 1
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 5,625
 5,918
 (293) (5)
Commercial 4,410
 4,512
 (102) (2)
Industrial 5,584
 5,064
 520
 10
Governmental 180
 179
 1
 1
Total retail 15,799
 15,673
 126
 1
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 1,316
 1,427
 (111) (8)
Non-associated companies 4,374
 6,440
 (2,066) (32)
Total 21,489
 23,540
 (2,051) (9)

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Results of Operations

Net Income

Third Quarter 2017 Compared to Third Quarter 2016

Net income decreased $3.2 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by higher other income.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income decreased $149.3 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the IRS related to the 2010-2011 IRS audit which resulted in a $136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016. See Note 31 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additionala discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

106

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$616,347 $696,939 $1,199,096 $1,255,895 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale102,350 202,795 215,859 289,020 
Purchased power57,648 50,209 122,399 107,680 
Nuclear refueling outage expenses15,504 14,210 30,845 28,280 
Other operation and maintenance178,044 187,319 334,863 344,576 
Decommissioning21,667 20,428 43,017 40,557 
Taxes other than income taxes34,743 32,072 67,094 65,274 
Depreciation and amortization99,707 96,548 196,148 192,158 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(19,185)(21,518)(40,029)(42,060)
TOTAL490,478 582,063 970,196 1,025,485 
OPERATING INCOME125,869 114,876 228,900 230,410 
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction5,400 3,920 10,243 6,975 
Interest and investment income5,727 2,840 13,206 9,160 
Miscellaneous - net(6,239)(4,892)(8,340)(10,284)
TOTAL4,888 1,868 15,109 5,851 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense46,038 37,452 91,405 73,499 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(2,169)(1,558)(4,114)(2,772)
TOTAL43,869 35,894 87,291 70,727 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES86,888 80,850 156,718 165,534 
Income taxes19,940 17,740 30,374 36,857 
NET INCOME66,948 63,110 126,344 128,677 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(1,006)(529)(2,635)(1,916)
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO MEMBER'S EQUITY$67,954 $63,639 $128,979 $130,593 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

107

























(Page left blank intentionally)

108

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$126,344 $128,677 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization270,098 268,699 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued33,572 27,814 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables21,444 (95,608)
Fuel inventory(6,830)7,316 
Accounts payable(43,953)34,321 
Taxes accrued(4,315)14,824 
Interest accrued10,421 1,585 
Deferred fuel costs123,264 (2,384)
Other working capital accounts(30,581)13,458 
Provisions for estimated losses(26,606)(4,119)
Other regulatory assets(51,960)(30,484)
Other regulatory liabilities97,349 (267,437)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities(18,948)(31,762)
Other assets and liabilities(91,600)321,622 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities407,699 386,522 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(524,723)(351,907)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction10,243 6,975 
Nuclear fuel purchases(73,912)(53,256)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel17,614 37,198 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales54,469 101,428 
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds(65,584)(111,032)
Change in money pool receivable - net— (6,216)
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs17,933 — 
Other106 — 
Net cash flow used in investing activities(563,854)(376,810)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt661,923 223,882 
Retirement of long-term debt(394,810)(7,511)
Changes in money pool payable - net(28,468)(139,904)
Common equity distributions paid(89,000)(36,000)
Other5,445 (4,825)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities155,090 35,642 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(1,065)45,354 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period5,278 12,915 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$4,213 $58,269 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: 
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$79,716 $70,803 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

109

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$352 $1,911 
Temporary cash investments3,861 3,367 
Total cash and cash equivalents4,213 5,278 
Accounts receivable:
Customer138,675 140,513 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(5,236)(6,528)
Associated companies38,081 45,336 
Other69,155 101,096 
Accrued unbilled revenues135,114 116,816 
Total accounts receivable375,789 397,233 
Deferred fuel costs16,475 139,739 
Fuel inventory - at average cost57,974 51,144 
Materials and supplies - at average cost318,400 288,260 
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs65,057 56,443 
Prepayments and other50,866 26,576 
TOTAL888,774 964,673 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds1,326,627 1,199,860 
Other2,306 2,414 
TOTAL1,328,933 1,202,274 
UTILITY PLANT
Electric14,475,635 14,077,844 
Construction work in progress476,253 417,244 
Nuclear fuel177,770 176,174 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT15,129,658 14,671,262 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization5,879,574 5,729,304 
UTILITY PLANT - NET9,250,084 8,941,958 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Other regulatory assets1,862,241 1,810,281 
Deferred fuel costs68,883 68,883 
Other23,784 18,507 
TOTAL1,954,908 1,897,671 
TOTAL ASSETS$13,422,699 $13,006,576 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

110

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt$415,000 $290,000 
Accounts payable:
Associated companies212,328 276,362 
Other307,962 310,339 
Customer deposits106,383 102,799 
Taxes accrued96,211 100,526 
Interest accrued29,237 18,816 
Other64,726 43,394 
TOTAL1,231,847 1,142,236 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued1,539,103 1,498,234 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits27,871 28,472 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net424,591 435,157 
Other regulatory liabilities583,673 475,758 
Decommissioning1,515,753 1,472,736 
Accumulated provisions53,392 79,998 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities99,010 118,020 
Long-term debt4,023,803 3,876,500 
Other104,713 97,650 
TOTAL8,371,909 8,082,525 
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Member's equity3,793,970 3,753,990 
Noncontrolling interest24,973 27,825 
TOTAL3,818,943 3,781,815 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$13,422,699 $13,006,576 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

111

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Noncontrolling InterestMember's EquityTotal
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$33,110 $3,542,745 $3,575,855 
Net income (loss)(1,387)66,954 65,567 
Balance at March 31, 202231,723 3,609,699 3,641,422 
Net income (loss)(529)63,639 63,110 
Common equity distributions— (36,000)(36,000)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest(190)— (190)
Balance at June 30, 2022$31,004 $3,637,338 $3,668,342 
Balance at December 31, 2022$27,825 $3,753,990 $3,781,815 
Net income (loss)(1,629)61,026 59,397 
Common equity distributions— (80,000)(80,000)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest(104)— (104)
Balance at March 31, 202326,092 3,735,016 3,761,108 
Net income (loss)(1,006)67,954 66,948 
Common equity distributions— (9,000)(9,000)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest(113)— (113)
Balance at June 30, 2023$24,973 $3,793,970 $3,818,943 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

112


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Results of Operations

Net Income

Second Quarter 2023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022

Net income decreased $53.4 million primarily due to the net effects of Entergy Louisiana’s storm cost securitization in May 2022, including a $290 million reduction in income tax expense, partially offset by a $224.4 million ($165.4 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge to reflect its obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with customers. The decrease was partially offset by higher other income, higher retail electric price, and lower other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.May 2022 storm cost securitization.


Net Revenue

Third Quarter 2017Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to ThirdSix Months Ended June 30, 2022

Net income increased $39.8 million primarily due to the net effects of Entergy Louisiana’s storm cost securitization in March 2023, including a $133.4 million reduction in income tax expense, partially offset by a $103.4 million ($76.4 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with customers, higher retail electric price, higher other income, and lower other operation and maintenance expenses. The net income increase was partially offset by the net effects of Entergy Louisiana’s storm cost securitization in May 2022, including a $290 million reduction in income tax expense, partially offset by a $224.4 million ($165.4 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the storm cost securitizations.

Operating Revenues

Second Quarter 20162023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:
2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$1,515.8 
$719.8
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(20.6(320.9))
Storm restoration carrying costs(37.5)
Volume/weather(7.9)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers9.2 
Retail electric price13.846.9 
Other2023 operating revenues4.4$1,205.6
2017 net revenue
$717.4


Entergy Louisiana’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

113

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Storm restoration carrying costs represent the equity component of storm restoration carrying costs, recorded in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida restoration costs in May 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales and a decrease in commercial sales.and industrial usage. The decrease was partially offset by an increasedecreased usage from these commercial and industrial customers has a relatively smaller effect on operating revenues because a larger portion of 282 GWh, or 4%, in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand for existingthe revenues from those customers as well as expansion projects in the chemicals industry.comes from fixed charges.


The retail electric price variance is primarily duereturn of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the timingreturn of recovery of purchased power capacity costsunprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through changes in the formula rate plan mechanism.


108

Entergy Louisiana, LLCthe Tax Cuts and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 ComparedJobs Act. In the second quarter 2022, $9.2 million was returned to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net revenue consistscustomers through reductions in operating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers for the second quarter 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the changewere offset by reductions in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2017income tax expense. See Note 2 to the nine months ended September 30, 2016:financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$1,891.8
Retail electric price23.1
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation17.2
Volume/weather(31.6)
Other1.2
2017 net revenue
$1,901.7


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues, implemented withincluding increases in the first billing cycle of March 2016, to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of Power Blocks 3distribution and 4 of the Union Power Station in March 2016 and the timing oftransmission recovery of purchased power costs through the formula rate plan mechanism.mechanisms, effective September 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of formula rate plan revenues.

The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan proceeding.

Total electric energy sales for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential3,694 3,824 (3)
Commercial2,801 2,879 (3)
Industrial8,014 8,148 (2)
Governmental206 208 (1)
  Total retail14,715 15,059 (2)
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies678 1,315 (48)
  Non-associated companies464 467 (1)
Total15,857 16,841 (6)

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s operating revenues.


114

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Following is an analysis of the settlementchange in operating revenues comparing the six months ended June 30, 2023 to the six months ended June 30, 2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2022 operating revenues$2,781.8 
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(300.9)
Volume/weather(29.5)
Storm restoration carrying costs(6.9)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers18.4 
Retail electric price87.9 
2023 operating revenues$2,550.8

Entergy Louisiana’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and benefit sharing.other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales.

Storm restoration carrying costs represent the equity component of storm restoration carrying costs, recorded in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period. This decrease wasHurricane Ida restoration costs in May 2022, partially offset by an increasethe equity component of 610 GWh, or 3%, in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand for existing customers, expansion projects in the chemicals industry, and an increase in demand for cogeneration customers, partially offset by an extended seasonal outage for an existing large refinery customer.
Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2017 Compared to Third Quarter 2016

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $10.4 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear laborstorm restoration carrying costs, including contract labor, to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals and a higher scope of work performed during plant outages in the third quarter 2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes, local franchise fees, and state franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments, including the assessment of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017. Local franchise fees increased primarily due to higher revenues in the third quarter 2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016. State franchise taxes increased primarily due to a change in the Louisiana franchise tax law which became effective for 2017.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in the third quarter 2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016, which

109

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

included the St. Charles Power Station project, and higher realized gains in the third quarter 2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016 on the River Bend and Waterford 3 decommissioning trust fund investments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $12.3 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals, partially offset by a lower scope of work performed during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals;
an increase of $4.3 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expenserecorded in first quarter 2016;
an increase of $3.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 42023, recognized as part of the Union Power Stationsecuritization of Hurricane Ida restoration costs in March 2016, partially offset by asbestos loss provisions in 2016;
an increase of $3.5 million as a result of the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO.2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further information ondiscussion of the recoverystorm cost securitizations.

The return of these costs;
an increase of $3.4 million in other loss provisions; and
an increase of $2.1 million in transmission expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor.

Taxes other thanunprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valoremcustomers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes local franchise fees, state franchise taxes, and payroll taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments, including the assessment of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017. Local franchise fees increased primarily due to higher revenues in 2017 as compared to 2016. State franchise taxes increased primarily due to a changethrough changes in the Louisiana franchise tax law which becameformula rate plan effective for 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily dueMay 2018 in response to additions to plant in service, including Power Blocks 3 and 4the enactment of the Union Power Station purchasedTax Cuts and Jobs Act. In the six months ended June 30, 2022, $18.4 million was returned to customers through reductions in March 2016 andoperating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers for the effects of recordingsix months ended June 30, 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in third quarter 2016 final court decisionsoperating revenues were offset by reductions in the River Bend and Waterford 3 lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded include the reimbursement of approximately $6 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as depreciationincome tax expense. See Note 142 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Union Power Station purchase.Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues, including increases in the distribution and transmission recovery mechanisms, effective September 2022. See Note 82 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation.formula rate plan proceeding.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, which included the St. Charles Power Station project, and higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 on the River Bend decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio rebalancing to the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun.

Interest expense decreased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, which included the St. Charles Power Station project.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 33.6% for the third quarter 2017 and 32.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2017 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to book and tax differences


110

115

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Total electric energy sales for Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
related
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential6,378 6,893 (7)
Commercial5,248 5,300 (1)
Industrial15,845 15,754 
Governmental400 399 — 
  Total retail27,871 28,346 (2)
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies2,355 2,656 (11)
  Non-associated companies688 1,323 (48)
Total30,914 32,325 (4)

See Note 13 to the non-taxablefinancial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s operating revenues.

Other Income Statement Variances

Second Quarter 2023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $11.8 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023 and a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $7.4 million in power delivery expenses primarily due to lower transmission repairs and maintenance costs;
a decrease of $7.4 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
a decrease of $6.6 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to lower nuclear labor costs; and
a decrease of $4.9 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to 2022.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Other regulatory charges (credits) - net includes a regulatory charge of $224.4 million, recorded in second quarter 2022, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization. In addition, Entergy Louisiana records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and nuclear decommissioning trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue.

Other income distributions earned onincreased primarily due to an increase of $38.7 million in affiliated dividend income from affiliated preferred membership interests, and book and tax differences related to storm cost securitizations, and a $31.6 million charge, recorded

116

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
in second quarter 2022, for the allowanceLURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust I established as part of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida May 2022 storm cost securitization. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for equity fundsdiscussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $18.1 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023, a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities, and a revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $13 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
a decrease of $9.8 million in power delivery expenses primarily due to lower transmission repairs and maintenance costs and the timing of vegetation maintenance;
a decrease of $8 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during construction,plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to prior year; and
a decrease of $6.6 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to lower nuclear labor costs and lower costs associated with materials and supplies in 2023 as compared to 2022.

The decrease was partially offset by statean increase of $3.2 million in insurance expenses primarily due to lower nuclear insurance refunds received in 2023.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Other regulatory charges (credits) - net includes:

a regulatory charge of $103.4 million, recorded in first quarter 2023, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the March 2023 storm cost securitization; and
a regulatory charge of $224.4 million, recorded in second quarter 2022, to reflect Entergy Louisiana’s obligation to provide credits to its customers as described in an LPSC ancillary order issued in the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida securitization regulatory proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization.

In addition, Entergy Louisiana records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and nuclear decommissioning trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue.

Other income taxes.increased primarily due to an increase of $62.2 million in affiliated dividend income from affiliated preferred membership interests, related to storm cost securitizations, and a $31.6 million charge, recorded in second quarter 2022, for the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust I established as part of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida May 2022 storm cost securitization. The increase was partially offset by a $14.6 million charge, recorded in first quarter 2023, for the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest in the storm trust II established as part of the March 2023 Hurricane Ida storm cost


117

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
securitization. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the storm cost securitizations.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 34.4%20.7% for the thirdsecond quarter 2016.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the thirdsecond quarter 20162023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by the accrual for state income taxes.taxes and the amortization of state accumulated deferred income taxes as a result of a tax rate change.


The effective income tax rate was 10.4%(9.1%) for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2023. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35%21% was primarily due to the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertainreduction in income tax positionsexpense as a result of the settlementMarch 2023 securitization of storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the 2010-2011 IRS audit in the second quarter 2016Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021 and book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by the accrual for state income taxes.taxes and the amortization of state accumulated deferred income taxes as a result of a tax rate change. See Note 3Notes 2 and 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement.

Louisiana Tax Legislation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Louisiana Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-Kherein for a discussion of the LouisianaMarch 2023 storm cost securitization under Act 293.

The effective income tax legislation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flowsrate was (3,258.7%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$213,850
 
$35,102
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
    Operating activities927,176
 877,945
    Investing activities(1,379,365) (1,138,425)
    Financing activities293,862
 320,457
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(158,327) 59,977
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$55,523
 
$95,079

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $49.2 millionsecond quarter 2022. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared tosecond quarter 2022 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2016federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to:

to the reduction in income tax refundsexpense as a result of $116.9 million in 2017 comparedthe securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida storm costs pursuant to incomeLouisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021, book and tax payments of $62.7 million in 2016. Entergy Louisiana received income tax refunds in 2017 and made income tax payments in 2016 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement. The income tax refunds in 2017 resulted from the utilization of Entergy Louisiana’s net operating losses. The income tax payments in 2016differences related to the 2016 paymentsnon-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, the amortization of investment tax credits, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by the accrual for state taxes resulting from the effect of the final settlement of the 2006-2007 IRS auditincome taxes. See Notes 2 and the effect of net operating loss limitations. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the audit.May 2022 storm cost securitization under Act 293. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects of and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rate was (144.7%) for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the reduction in income tax expense as a result of the securitization of Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021, book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, and the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by the accrual for state income taxes. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization under Act 293. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects of and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Income Tax Legislation

See MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - LouisianaIncome Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion onof the net operating loss limitations;Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.


118

111

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Liquidity and Capital Resources
an interest payment
Cash Flow

Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$56,613 $18,573 
Net cash provided by (used in):
    Operating activities928,060 206,713 
    Investing activities(2,658,135)(3,653,859)
    Financing activities2,530,488 3,494,744 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents800,413 47,598 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$857,026 $66,171 

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $721.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

the timing of $60payments to vendors;
a decrease of $210.8 million made in March 2016storm spending primarily due to Hurricane Ida restoration efforts in 2022;
the refund of $27.8 million received from System Energy in January 2023 related to the purchase of a beneficial interestsale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed with the Waterford 3 leased assets.

The increase was partially offset by:

a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project.FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the settlementthese refunds and refund;related proceedings;
an increase of $64 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages;
a decrease due tolower fuel costs and the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs; and
proceeds of $25.1 million received in August 2016 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed.costs. See Note 12 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery; and
higher collections from customers.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $995.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

a decrease in investment in affiliates due to the $3,163.6 million purchase by the storm trust I of preferred membership interests issued by an Entergy affiliate, partially offset by the $1,390.6 million redemption of preferred membership interests. See Note 82 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the DOE litigation.May 2022 storm cost securitization;

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $240.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to:

an increasea decrease of $297.1$613.7 million in fossil-fueled generationdistribution construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending on the St. Charles Power Station and Lake Charles Power Station projectslower capital expenditures for storm restoration in 2017;2023;
fluctuationsa decrease of $283.5 million in nuclear fuel activity becausenet payments to storm reserve escrow accounts;
a decrease of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and service deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
an increase of $95.3$162 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scopelower capital expenditures for storm restoration in 2023 and decreased spending on various transmission projects in 2023; and
the $46.6 million redemption, in February 2023, of work performedpreferred membership interests held by the storm trust I, as part of periodic redemptions that are expected to occur, subject to certain conditions, for the preferred membership interests that were issued in 2017 as comparedconnection with the May 2022 storm cost securitization. See Note

119

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
2 to the same periodfinancial statements in 2016;the Form 10-K for a discussion of the May 2022 storm cost securitization and the storm trust I’s investment in preferred membership interests.

The decrease was partially offset by:

an increase in investment in affiliates in 2023 due to the $1,457.7 million purchase by the storm trust II of preferred membership interests issued by an Entergy affiliate. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the March 2023 storm cost securitization and the storm trust II’s investment in preferred membership interests;
an increase of $60.7$95.2 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2017;2023;
money pool activity; and
$33.3 million in funds held on deposit for interest payments due October 1, 2017;
an increase of $25.8$31.7 million as a result of fluctuations in information technology construction expendituresnuclear fuel activity, primarily due to increased spending on advanced metering infrastructure;
an increasevariations from year to year in the timing and pricing of $17.3 million in distribution construction expenditures due to increased spending on digital technology improvements withinfuel reload requirements, materials and services deliveries, and the customer contact centers; and
proceedstiming of $17.3 million received in August 2016 fromcash payments during the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously capitalized. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation.cycle.

The increase was partially offset by the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $475 million in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.


Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivablereceivables from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana‘sLouisiana’s receivable from the money pool increased by $50.4$275.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to increasingdecreasing by $3.3$7.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $26.6$964.3 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due toto:

proceeds from securitization of $1.5 billion received by the net issuance of $350.5 million of long-term debtstorm trust II in 20172023 compared to proceeds from securitization of $3.2 billion received by the net issuancestorm trust I in 2022;
money pool activity; and
an increase of $557.7$35.3 million in 2016.common equity distributions paid in 2023 in order to maintain Entergy Louisiana’s capital structure.

112

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


The decrease was partially offset by:


a capital contribution of approximately $1.5 billion in 2023 as compared to a capital contribution of approximately $1 billion in 2022, both received indirectly from Entergy Corporation and related to the March 2023 storm cost securitization and the May 2022 storm cost securitization, respectively;
the repayment, prior to maturity, in May 2022 of $435 million, a portion of the outstanding principal, of 0.62% Series mortgage bonds due November 2023; and
a decrease of $123.8$99 million of common equity distributions primarily as a result of higher construction expenditures and higher nuclear fuel purchases in 2017 as compared2023 in net repayments on Entergy Louisiana’s revolving credit facility.

Decreases in Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the same period in 2016;money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool decreased $226.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023.
net borrowings of $36.8 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities in 2017 compared to net repayments of $18.4 million in 2016.

See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the storm cost securitizations.



120

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure


Entergy Louisiana’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Louisiana is primarily due to the $1.5 billion capital contribution received indirectly from Entergy Corporation in March 2023.
June 30,
 2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital48.6 %53.0 %
Effect of subtracting cash(2.0 %)(0.1 %)
Net debt to net capital (non-GAAP)46.6 %52.9 %
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital53.5% 53.4%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.4%) (0.5%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)53.1% 52.9%
Effect of subtracting cash(0.2%) (0.9%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)52.9% 52.0%
(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, finance lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bondsratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provideit provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recoursecondition. The net debt to Entergy Louisiana, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.net capital ratio is a non-GAAP measure. Entergy Louisiana also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Louisiana’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Louisiana is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $4.1 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments, such as the St. Charles Power Station and the Lake Charles Power Station, discussed below; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investments in River Bend and Waterford 3; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


113

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
 2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
 2022
December 31,
2021
(In Thousands)
$275,559($226,114)$7,377$14,539
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$72,899 $22,503 $9,428 $6,154


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $350 million scheduled to expire in August 2022.June 2028.  The credit facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against 50%$15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were no cash borrowings and $9.1 million ofno letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility.  In addition, Entergy Louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, a $38.52023, $20 million letterin letters of credit waswere outstanding under Entergy Louisiana’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


The Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities, oneeach in the amount of $105 million and one in the amount of $85 million, both scheduled to expire in May 2019.June 2025.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $78.82023, $56.4 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Louisiana River Bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $40.6 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $36.32023, $49.8 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Louisiana Waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities.


Lake Charles Power Station


121

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, Winter Storm Uri, and Hurricane Ida

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2020 and October 2020, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta caused significant damage to portions of Entergy Louisiana’s service area. The storms resulted in widespread outages, significant damage to distribution and transmission infrastructure, and the loss of sales during the outages. Additionally, as a result of Hurricane Laura’s extensive damage to the grid infrastructure serving the impacted area, large portions of the underlying transmission system required nearly a complete rebuild. In November 2016,February 2021 two winter storms (collectively, Winter Storm Uri) brought freezing rain and ice to Louisiana. Ice accumulation sagged or downed trees, limbs, and power lines, causing damage to Entergy Louisiana’s transmission and distribution systems. The additional weight of ice caused trees and limbs to fall into power lines and other electric equipment. When the ice melted, it affected vegetation and electrical equipment, causing additional outages. In August 2021, Hurricane Ida caused extensive damage to Entergy Louisiana’s distribution and, to a lesser extent, transmission systems resulting in widespread power outages.

In April 2022, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC relating to Hurricane Ida restoration costs. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Ida were estimated to be approximately $2.54 billion, including approximately $1.96 billion in capital costs and approximately $586 million in non-capital costs. Including carrying costs of $57 million through December 2022, Entergy Louisiana was seeking an LPSC determination that $2.60 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As part of this filing, Entergy Louisiana also was seeking an LPSC determination that an additional $32 million in costs associated with the restoration of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Hurricane Zeta as well as Winter Storm Uri was prudently incurred. This amount was exclusive of the requested $3 million in carrying costs through December 2022. In total, Entergy Louisiana was requesting an LPSC determination that $2.64 billion was prudently incurred and, therefore, eligible for recovery from customers. As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2022 the LPSC approved financing of a $1 billion storm escrow account from which funds were withdrawn to finance costs associated with Hurricane Ida restoration. In June 2022, Entergy Louisiana supplemented the application with a request regarding the financing and recovery of the recoverable storm restoration costs. Specifically, Entergy Louisiana requested approval to securitize its restoration costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55 financing, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. In October 2022 the LPSC staff recommended a finding that the requested storm restoration costs of $2.64 billion, including associated carrying costs of $59.1 million, were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery from customers. The LPSC staff further recommended approval of Entergy Louisiana’s plans to securitize these costs, net of the $1 billion in funds withdrawn from the storm escrow account described above. The parties negotiated and executed an uncontested stipulated settlement which was filed with the LPSC in December 2022. The settlement agreement contains the following key terms: $2.57 billion of restoration costs from Hurricane Ida, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, and Winter Storm Uri were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery; carrying costs of $59.2 million were recoverable; and Entergy Louisiana was authorized to finance $1.657 billion utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293. In January 2023, the LPSC approved the stipulated settlement subject to certain modifications. These modifications include the recognition of accumulated deferred income tax benefits related to damaged assets and system restoration costs as a reduction of the amount authorized to be financed utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293, from $1.657 billion to $1.491 billion. These modifications did not affect the LPSC’s conclusion that all system restoration costs sought by Entergy Louisiana were reasonable and prudent. In February 2023 the Louisiana Bond Commission voted to authorize the Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority (LCDA), a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana, to issue the bonds authorized in the LPSC’s financing order.

In March 2023 the Hurricane Ida securitization financing closed, resulting in the issuance of approximately $1.491 billion principal amount of bonds by the LCDA and a remaining regulatory asset of $180 million to be recovered through the exclusion of the accumulated deferred income taxes related to the damaged assets and system restoration costs from the determination of future rates. The securitization was authorized pursuant to the Louisiana

122

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Utilities Restoration Corporation Act, Part VIII of Chapter 9 of Title 45 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, as supplemented by Act 293 of the Louisiana Legislature’s Regular Session of 2021. The LCDA loaned the proceeds to the LURC. Pursuant to Act 293, the LURC contributed the net bond proceeds to a State legislatively authorized and LURC-sponsored trust, Restoration Law Trust II (the storm trust II).

Pursuant to Act 293, the net proceeds of the bonds were used by the storm trust II to purchase 14,576,757.48 Class B preferred, non-voting membership interest units (the preferred membership interests) issued by Entergy Finance Company, LLC, a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Entergy. Entergy Finance Company is required to make annual distributions (dividends) commencing on December 15, 2023 on the preferred membership interests issued to the storm trust II. These annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be distributed to Entergy Louisiana and the LURC, as beneficiaries of the storm trust II. Specifically, 1% of the annual dividends received by the storm trust II will be distributed to the LURC for the benefit of customers, and 99% will be distributed to Entergy Louisiana, net of storm trust expenses. The preferred membership interests have a stated annual cumulative cash dividend rate of 7.5% and a liquidation price of $100 per unit. The terms of the preferred membership interests include certain financial covenants to which Entergy Finance Company is subject. Semi-annual redemptions of the preferred membership interests, subject to certain conditions, are expected to occur over the next 15 years.

Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the bonds issued by the LCDA on their balance sheets because the bonds are the obligation of the LCDA. The bonds are secured by system restoration property, which is the right granted by law to the LURC to collect a system restoration charge from customers. The system restoration charge is adjusted at least semi-annually to ensure that it is sufficient to service the bonds. Entergy Louisiana collects the system restoration charge on behalf of the LURC and remits the collections to the bond indenture trustee. Entergy Louisiana began collecting the system restoration charge effective with the first billing cycle of April 2023 and the system restoration charge is expected to remain in place for up to 15 years. Entergy and Entergy Louisiana do not report the collections as revenue because Entergy Louisiana is merely acting as a billing and collection agent for the LCDA and the LURC. In the remote possibility that the system restoration charge, as well as any funds in the excess subaccount and funds in the debt service reserve account, are insufficient to service the bonds resulting in a payment default, the storm trust II is required to liquidate Entergy Finance Company preferred membership interests in an amount equal to what would be required to cure the default. The estimated value of this indirect guarantee is immaterial.

From the proceeds from the issuance of the preferred membership interests, Entergy Finance Company loaned approximately $1.5 billion to Entergy, which was indirectly contributed to Entergy Louisiana as a capital contribution.

As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, the securitization resulted in recognition of a net reduction of income tax expense of approximately $133 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions, by Entergy Louisiana. Entergy’s recognition of reduced income tax expense was offset by other tax charges resulting in a net reduction of income tax expense of $129 million, after taking into account a provision for uncertain tax positions. In recognition of its obligations related to an LPSC ancillary order issued as part of the securitization regulatory proceeding, Entergy Louisiana recorded in first quarter 2023 a $103 million ($76 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect its obligation to share the benefits of the securitization with customers.

As discussed in Note 3 and Note 12 to the financial statements herein, Entergy Louisiana consolidates the storm trust II as a variable interest entity and the LURC’s 1% beneficial interest is shown as noncontrolling interest in the financial statements. In first quarter 2023, Entergy Louisiana recorded a charge of $14.6 million in other income to reflect the LURC’s beneficial interest in the storm trust II.


123

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
System Resilience and Storm Hardening

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2022, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Lake Charles Power Station, a nominal 994 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Westlake, Louisiana, on land adjacent to the existing Nelson plant in Calcasieu Parish. The current estimated cost of the Lake Charles Power Station is $872 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and other related costs. In May 2017 the parties to the proceeding agreed to an uncontested stipulation finding that construction of the Lake Charles Power Station is in the public interest finding regarding Phase I of Entergy Louisiana’s Future Ready resilience plan and authorizing an in-service rate recovery plan. In July 2017 the LPSC issued an order unanimously approving the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2020.

Washington Parish Energy Center

In April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed a purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the acquisitionapproval of a peaking plant. Calpine will constructrider mechanism to recover the plant, which will consistprogram’s costs. Phase I reflects the first five years of two natural gas-fired combustion turbine units with a total nominal capacity of approximately 360 MW. The plant, named the Washington Parish Energy Center, will be located in Bogalusa, Louisianaten-year resilience plan and subject to permits and approvals, is expected to be completed in 2021. Subject to regulatory approvals, Entergy Louisiana will purchase the plant once it is complete for an estimated totalincludes investment of approximately $261 million,$5 billion, including hardening investment, transmission dead-end structures, enhanced vegetation management, and othertelecommunications improvement. In April 2023 a procedural schedule was established with a hearing scheduled for January 2024.

The LPSC had previously opened a formal rulemaking proceeding in December 2021 to investigate efforts to improve resilience of electric utility infrastructure. In April 2023 the LPSC staff issued a draft rule in the rulemaking proceeding related costs. to a requirement to file a grid resilience plan. The procedural schedule entered in the rulemaking proceeding contemplates adoption of a final rule in September 2023.

2022 Solar Portfolio and Expansion of the Geaux Green Option

In May 2017,February 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the Iberville/Coastal Prairie facility, which will provide 175 MW of capacity through a PPA with a third party, and the Sterlington facility, a 49 MW self-build project located near the deactivated Sterlington power plant. Entergy Louisiana is seeking to include these within the portfolio supporting the Geaux Green Option (Rider GGO) rate schedule to help fulfill customer interest in access to renewable energy. Entergy Louisiana has requested the costs of these facilities, as offset by Rider GGO revenues, be deemed eligible for recovery in accordance with the terms of the formula rate plan and fuel adjustment clause rate mechanisms that exist at the time the facilities are placed into service. The Louisiana Energy Users Group and the Alliance for Affordable Energy have intervened, and discovery is underway. A procedural schedule has been established with a hearing scheduled for December 2023 and settlement negotiations are ongoing. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Liquidity and Capital Resources- Uses of Capital - 2021 Solar Certification and the Geaux Green Optionin the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Rider GGO.

Alternative RFP and Certification

In March 2023, Entergy Louisiana made the first phase of a bifurcated filing to seek approval from the LPSC for an alternative to the requests for proposals (RFP) process that would enable the acquisition of up to 3 GW of solar resources on a faster timeline than the current RFP and certification process allows. The initial phase of the filing established the need for the acquisition of additional resources and the need for an alternative to the RFP process. The second phase of the filing, which contains the details of the proposal for the alternative competitive procurement process and the information necessary to support certification, was filed in May 2023. In addition to the acquisition of up to 3 GW of solar resources, the filing also seeks approval of a new renewable energy credits-based tariff. Several parties have intervened, and a procedural schedule was established in May 2023 with a hearing scheduled for March 2024.

Nelson Industrial Steam Company

Entergy Louisiana is a partner in the Nelson Industrial Steam Company (NISCO) partnership which owns two petroleum coke generating units. In April 2018.2023 these generating units suspended operations in the MISO market, and Entergy Louisiana currently is working with the partners to wind up the NISCO partnership, which will ultimately result in ownership of the generating units transferring to Entergy Louisiana. In May 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the FERC for transaction authorization pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. In June 2023 the LPSC filed a notice to intervene in the proceeding. Entergy Louisiana is evaluating the effect of the transaction on its results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, but at this time does not expect the effect to be material.



124

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel Cost Recoveryin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel costfuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.



Retail Rates

2022 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2022 calendar year operations. The 2022 test year evaluation report produced an earned return on common equity of 8.33%, requiring an approximately $70.7 million increase to base rider revenue. Due to a cap for the 2021 and 2022 test years, however, base rider formula rate plan revenues are only being increased by approximately $4.9 million, leaving an ongoing revenue deficiency of approximately $65.9 million and providing for prospective return on common equity opportunity of approximately 8.38%. Other changes in formula rate plan revenue driven by increases in capacity costs, primarily legacy capacity costs, additions eligible for recovery through the transmission recovery mechanism and distribution recovery mechanism, and higher sales during the test period, are offset by reductions in net MISO costs as well as credits for FERC-ordered refunds. Also included in the 2022 test year distribution recovery mechanism revenue requirement is a $6 million credit relating to the distribution recovery mechanism performance accountability standards and requirements. In total, the net increase in formula rate plan revenues, including base formula rate plan revenues inside the formula rate plan bandwidth and subject to the cap, as well as other formula rate plan revenues outside of the bandwidth, is $85.2 million.

COVID-19 Orders

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2020 the LPSC issued an order authorizing utilities to record as a regulatory asset expenses incurred from the suspension of disconnections and collection of late fees imposed by LPSC orders associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2023, Entergy Louisiana filed an application proposing to utilize approximately $1.6 billion in certain low interest debt to generate earnings to apply toward the reduction of the COVID-19 regulatory asset, as well as to conduct additional outside right-of-way vegetation management activities and to apply to the minor storm reserve account. In that filing, Entergy Louisiana proposed to delay repayment of certain shorter-term first mortgage bonds that were issued to finance storm restoration costs until the costs could be securitized and to invest the funds that otherwise would be used to repay those bonds in the money pool to take advantage of the spread between prevailing interest rates on investments in the money pool and the interest rates on the bonds. The LPSC approved Entergy Louisiana’s requested relief in June 2023 and a subsequent filing will be required to permit the LPSC to review the COVID-19 regulatory asset. As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Louisiana had a regulatory asset of $47.8 million for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Industrial and Commercial Customers

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Industrial and Commercial Customers” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.

Federal Regulation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.

114

125

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Retail Rates - Electric

2014 Formula Rate Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2015, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s and Entergy Louisiana’s 2014 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed an unopposed joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of this proceeding with no changes to rates already implemented.

2015 Formula Rate Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2015 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of the May 2016 evaluation report, interim updates, and corresponding proceedings with no changes to rates already implemented.

In November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC a request to extend the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider provision of its formula rate plan. In March 2017 the LPSC staff submitted direct testimony generally supportive of a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism and the intervenor in the proceeding did not oppose an extension for this period of time. In June 2017 an uncontested joint stipulation authorizing a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider was filed and the LPSC approved the stipulation in July 2017.

2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2016 calendar year operations. The evaluation report reflects an earned return on common equity of 9.84%. As such, no adjustment to base formula rate plan revenue is required. The following adjustments, however, are required under the formula rate plan. The 2016 formula rate plan evaluation report shows a decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately $16.9 million, comprised of a decrease in legacy Entergy Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $3.5 million, a decrease in legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $9.7 million, and a decrease in incremental formula rate plan revenue of $3.7 million. Additionally, the formula rate plan evaluation report calls for a decrease of $40.5 million in the MISO cost recovery revenue requirement from the current level of $46.8 million to $6.3 million. Rates reflecting these adjustments were implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund, pending the review proceedings. Parties have intervened in the proceedings. No procedural schedule has been established. In September 2017 the LPSC issued its report indicating that no changes to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report are required but reserved for several issues, including Entergy Louisiana’s September 2017 update to its formula rate plan evaluation report.

Formula Rate Plan Extension Request

In August 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed a request with the LPSC seeking to extend its formula rate plan for three years (2017-2019) with limited modifications of its terms.  Those modifications include: a one-time resetting of base rates to the midpoint of the band at Entergy Louisiana’s authorized return on equity of 9.95% for the 2017 test year; narrowing of the formula rate plan bandwidth from a total of 160 basis points to 80 basis points; and a forward-looking mechanism that would allow Entergy Louisiana to recover certain transmission-related costs contemporaneously with when those projects begin delivering benefits to customers.  Entergy Louisiana has requested that the LPSC consider its request on an expedited basis and render a decision by December 2017, in an effort to maintain Entergy Louisiana’s current cycle for implementing rate adjustments, i.e., September 2018, without the need for filing a full base rate case proceeding.


115

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Waterford 3 Replacement Steam Generator Project

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project prudence review proceeding. The refund to customers of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC was made in January 2017. Following a review by the parties, an unopposed joint report of proceedings was filed by the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana in May 2017. In May 2017 the LPSC accepted the joint report of proceedings resolving the matter.

Deactivation or Retirement Decisions for Entergy Louisiana Plants

As a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1.  In January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. Parties have requested further proceedings on the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three-year term permitted by MISO.  An evidentiary hearing was held in August 2017 and post-hearing briefs were submitted in October 2017. A decision is expected in 2018.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application seeking a finding from the LPSC that Entergy Louisiana’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. The parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of Entergy Louisiana’s proposed AMI system, with modifications to the proposed customer charge. The stipulation also confirmed that Entergy Louisiana shall continue to include in rate base the remaining book value of the existing electric meters and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. In July 2017 the LPSC approved the stipulation.

Retail Rates - Gas

2016 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

In January 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2016. The filing of the evaluation report for test year 2016 reflected an earned return on common equity of 6.37%. As part of the original filing, pursuant to the extraordinary cost provision of the rate stabilization plan, Entergy Louisiana sought to recover approximately $1.5 million in deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016. Entergy Louisiana requested to recover the prudently incurred August 2016 storm restoration costs over ten years, outside of the rate stabilization plan sharing provisions. As a result, Entergy Louisiana’s filing sought an annual increase in revenue of $1.4 million. Following review of the filing, except for the proposed extraordinary cost recovery, the LPSC staff confirmed Entergy Louisiana’s filing was consistent with the principles and requirements of the rate stabilization plan. The extraordinary cost recovery request associated with the 2016 flood-related deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred for gas operations was removed from the rate stabilization plan pending LPSC consideration in a separate docket. In April 2017 the LPSC approved a joint report of proceedings and Entergy Louisiana submitted a revised evaluation report reflecting a $1.2 million annual increase in revenue with rates implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2017.


116

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

In connection with the joint report of proceedings accepted by the LPSC, in May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application to initiate a separate proceeding to recover the deferred operation and maintenance expenses of $1.4 million incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016 through the extraordinary cost provision of the gas rate stabilization plan. The LPSC staff submitted its direct testimony in the proceeding recommending recovery of $0.9 million. The procedural schedule includes a hearing in February 2018.

Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2016 the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings and purchased gas adjustment clause filings. The audit included a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2014 through 2015 and charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause for the period from 2012 through 2015. Discovery commenced in March 2017.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2010 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit included a review of the reasonableness of the charges flowed through the fuel adjustment clause by Entergy Louisiana for the period from 2005 through 2009. In December 2016 the LPSC opened a new docket in order to resolve the issue regarding the proper methodology for the recovery of nuclear dry fuel storage costs. In October 2017 the LPSC approved the continued recovery of the nuclear dry fuel storage costs through the fuel adjustment clause, resolving the open issue in the audit.

Industrial and Commercial Customers

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Industrial and Commercial Customers” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.

Federal Regulation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 

Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The followingFollowing is an update to that discussion.


River Bend’s operating licenseNRC Reactor Oversight Process

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process is a program to collect information about plant performance, assess the information for its safety significance, and provide for appropriate licensee and NRC response. The NRC evaluates plant performance by analyzing two distinct inputs: inspection findings resulting from the NRC’s inspection program and performance indicators reported by the licensee. The evaluations result in the placement of each plant in one of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix columns: “licensee response column,” or Column 1, “regulatory response column,” or Column 2, “degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 3, “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4, and “unacceptable performance,” or Column 5. Plants in Column 1 are subject to normal NRC inspection activities. Plants in Column 2, Column 3, or Column 4 are subject to progressively increasing levels of inspection by the NRC with, in general, progressively increasing levels of associated costs. Continued plant operation is not permitted for plants in Column 5. Waterford 3 is currently due to expire in August 2025.Column 1, and River Bend is currently in Column 2.

In September 2022 the NRC placed Waterford 3 in Column 2 based on an error associated with a radiation monitor calibration. Entergy corrected the issue with the radiation monitor in February 2022 and also corrected a subsequent radiation monitor calibration issue. In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application2023 the NRC completed a supplemental inspection of Waterford 3 in accordance with its inspection procedures for nuclear plants in Column 2 and Waterford 3 was returned to Column 1.

In July 2023 the NRC placed River Bend in Column 2, effective April 2023, based on failure to inspect wiring associated with the NRC for an extension of River Bend’s operating license to 2045. In October 2017 an intervenor filed with the NRC a petition to intervene and request for a hearing on thehigh pressure core spray system. River Bend license renewal application. As provided by NRC procedure,will remain in Column 2 pending successful completion of a panel of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has been designated to determine whether the intervenor’s three proposed contentions, or allegations of errors or omissions in the license renewal application, are admissible and, if so, to rule on any admitted contentions.supplemental inspection.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


117

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.


a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

126
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric $1,280,475
 
$1,240,217
 $3,216,677
 
$3,166,380
Natural gas 10,019
 9,235
 38,034
 37,251
TOTAL 1,290,494
 1,249,452
 3,254,711
 3,203,631
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 301,584
 261,979
 635,684
 616,402
Purchased power 273,325
 261,212
 795,825
 677,309
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 13,616
 12,894
 38,565
 38,648
Other operation and maintenance 238,249
 229,717
 704,696
 668,738
Decommissioning 12,444
 11,812
 36,850
 34,978
Taxes other than income taxes 45,059
 38,129
 135,418
 124,857
Depreciation and amortization 117,923
 114,251
 349,660
 336,294
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net (1,795) 6,507
 (78,503) 18,084
TOTAL 1,000,405
 936,501
 2,618,195
 2,515,310
         
OPERATING INCOME 290,089
 312,951
 636,516
 688,321
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 13,393
 6,735
 34,492
 18,479
Interest and investment income 42,662
 38,731
 124,411
 116,398
Miscellaneous - net (2,957) (4,429) (8,631) (10,044)
TOTAL 53,098
 41,037
 150,272
 124,833
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 69,518
 68,396
 205,316
 204,259
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (6,713) (3,455) (17,428) (9,735)
TOTAL 62,805
 64,941
 187,888
 194,524
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 280,382
 289,047
 598,900
 618,630
         
Income taxes 94,098
 99,541
 193,759
 64,193
         
NET INCOME 
$186,284
 
$189,506
 
$405,141
 
$554,437
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$1,191,909 $1,497,942 $2,511,661 $2,735,179 
Natural gas13,703 17,843 39,159 46,578 
TOTAL1,205,612 1,515,785 2,550,820 2,781,757 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale230,365 253,505 605,635 615,579 
Purchased power133,376 420,549 328,310 596,746 
Nuclear refueling outage expenses12,588 10,029 27,861 21,976 
Other operation and maintenance249,717 293,746 496,088 547,747 
Decommissioning18,820 17,911 37,406 35,599 
Taxes other than income taxes61,663 58,566 125,618 120,181 
Depreciation and amortization181,247 171,719 357,342 340,802 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(24,767)203,461 49,229 182,564 
TOTAL863,009 1,429,486 2,027,489 2,461,194 
OPERATING INCOME342,603 86,299 523,331 320,563 
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction8,654 2,859 17,715 9,585 
Interest and investment income (loss)31,880 (68,382)60,723 (84,380)
Interest and investment income - affiliated81,877 43,203 137,303 75,101 
Miscellaneous - net(42,583)36,986 (90,668)52,503 
TOTAL79,828 14,666 125,073 52,809 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense94,931 92,755 192,102 186,539 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(4,321)(1,218)(8,714)(4,244)
TOTAL90,610 91,537 183,388 182,295 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES331,821 9,428 465,016 191,077 
Income taxes68,561 (307,231)(42,268)(276,442)
NET INCOME263,260 316,659 507,284 467,519 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests819 258 1,373 258 
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO MEMBER'S EQUITY$262,441 $316,401 $505,911 $467,261 
See Notes to Financial Statements.



127
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
        
Net Income$186,284
 
$189,506
 $405,141
 
$554,437
Other comprehensive loss       
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of $232, $145, $756, and $404)(370) (232) (1,050) (725)
Other comprehensive loss(370) (232) (1,050) (725)
Comprehensive Income
$185,914
 
$189,274
 
$404,091
 
$553,712
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net Income$263,260 $316,659 $507,284 $467,519 
Other comprehensive loss
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of $653, $181, $943, and $407)(1,773)(491)(2,559)(1,104)
Other comprehensive loss(1,773)(491)(2,559)(1,104)
Comprehensive Income261,487 316,168 504,725 466,415 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests819 258 1,373 258 
Comprehensive Income Applicable to Member’s Equity$260,668 $315,910 $503,352 $466,157 
See Notes to Financial Statements.



128
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$405,141
 
$554,437
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 458,963
 462,007
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 303,397
 155,996
Changes in working capital:    
Receivables (92,610) (159,517)
Fuel inventory 7,643
 (1,578)
Accounts payable 31,865
 (18,420)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 97,138
 (55,780)
Interest accrued 9,149
 7,531
Deferred fuel costs (37,753) (6,091)
Other working capital accounts (49,266) (2,503)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses (6,331) 1,658
Changes in other regulatory assets 60,014
 73,920
Changes in other regulatory liabilities (72,060) 30,847
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities (70,489) (63,735)
Other (117,625) (100,827)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 927,176
 877,945
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (1,177,121) (675,248)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 34,492
 18,479
Payment for purchase of plant 
 (474,670)
Nuclear fuel purchases (159,637) (49,219)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel 28,884
 64,498
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 8,836
 
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (1,422) (823)
Changes to securitization account (6,538) (6,649)
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 176,056
 178,183
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (204,500) (206,976)
Changes in money pool receivable - net (50,396) (3,274)
Insurance proceeds 5,305
 
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs 
 17,274
Changes in other investments - net (33,324) 
Net cash flow used in investing activities (1,379,365) (1,138,425)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 646,850
 1,389,315
Retirement of long-term debt (296,359) (831,632)
Changes in credit borrowings - net 36,762
 (18,385)
Distributions paid:    
Common equity (91,250) (215,000)
Other (2,141) (3,841)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 293,862
 320,457
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (158,327) 59,977
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 213,850
 35,102
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$55,523
 
$95,079
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$189,896
 
$251,196
Income taxes 
($116,937) 
$62,676
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$507,284 $467,519 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization423,535 414,975 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued185 (198,525)
Changes in working capital:
Receivables67,807 (114,357)
Fuel inventory(14,907)(183)
Accounts payable(147,001)(20,380)
Taxes accrued48,015 (1,686)
Interest accrued(5,396)(3,263)
Deferred fuel costs188,801 (367,321)
Other working capital accounts(213,571)(107,409)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses3,909 294,067 
Changes in other regulatory assets448,144 859,908 
Changes in other regulatory liabilities217,746 (40,596)
Effect of securitization on regulatory asset(491,150)(1,190,338)
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities(12,364)(17,123)
Other(92,977)231,425 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities928,060 206,713 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(889,118)(1,565,051)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction17,715 9,585 
Nuclear fuel purchases(88,403)(77,561)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel16,733 37,634 
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account— 1,000,217 
Payments to storm reserve escrow account(6,602)(1,290,282)
Purchase of preferred membership interests of affiliate(1,457,676)(3,163,572)
Redemption of preferred membership interests of affiliate46,643 1,390,587 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales229,972 411,600 
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds(258,420)(419,873)
Changes in money pool receivable - net(275,559)7,162 
Litigation proceeds from settlement agreement— 5,695 
Insurance proceeds received for property damages6,184 — 
Other396 — 
Net cash flow used in investing activities(2,658,135)(3,653,859)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt833,484 1,777,192 
Retirement of long-term debt(851,617)(2,327,116)
Proceeds received by storm trust related to securitization1,457,676 3,163,572 
Capital contributions from parent1,457,676 1,000,000 
Change in money pool payable - net(226,114)— 
Common equity distributions paid(160,250)(125,000)
Other19,633 6,096 
Net cash flow provided by financing activities2,530,488 3,494,744 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents800,413 47,598 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period56,613 18,573 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$857,026 $66,171 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$192,861 $183,686 
Income taxes($6,037)$— 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

129
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$10,143
 
$49,972
Temporary cash investments 45,380
 163,878
Total cash and cash equivalents 55,523
 213,850
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 288,237
 213,517
Allowance for doubtful accounts (7,677) (6,277)
Associated companies 190,048
 155,794
Other 58,933
 54,186
Accrued unbilled revenues 174,379
 159,176
Total accounts receivable 703,920
 576,396
Fuel inventory 43,095
 50,738
Materials and supplies - at average cost 297,545
 294,421
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 83,207
 22,535
Prepaid taxes 12,966
 110,104
Prepayments and other 85,303
 41,687
TOTAL 1,281,559
 1,309,731
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests 1,390,587
 1,390,587
Decommissioning trust funds 1,260,022
 1,140,707
Storm reserve escrow account 284,071
 291,485
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 236,802
 217,494
Other 18,837
 28,844
TOTAL 3,190,319
 3,069,117
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 19,237,157
 18,827,532
Natural gas 182,704
 172,816
Construction work in progress 1,225,066
 670,201
Nuclear fuel 339,749
 249,807
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 20,984,676
 19,920,356
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 8,622,235
 8,420,596
UTILITY PLANT - NET 12,362,441
 11,499,760
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 480,257
 470,480
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $76,520 as of September 30, 2017 and $92,951 as of December 31, 2016) 1,098,267
 1,168,058
Deferred fuel costs 168,122
 168,122
Other 17,374
 16,003
TOTAL 1,764,020
 1,822,663
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$18,598,339
 
$17,701,271
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$260 $50,318 
Temporary cash investments856,766 6,295 
Total cash and cash equivalents857,026 56,613 
Accounts receivable:
Customer246,351 339,291 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(4,871)(7,595)
Associated companies349,096 88,896 
Other51,940 53,241 
Accrued unbilled revenues238,146 199,077 
Total accounts receivable880,662 672,910 
Deferred fuel costs— 159,183 
Fuel inventory56,766 41,859 
Materials and supplies - at average cost620,627 555,860 
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs78,449 53,833 
Prepayments and other208,093 76,646 
TOTAL2,701,623 1,616,904 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests4,574,605 3,163,572 
Decommissioning trust funds1,973,128 1,779,090 
Storm reserve escrow account300,008 293,406 
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)401,134 350,723 
Other14,270 19,679 
TOTAL7,263,145 5,606,470 
UTILITY PLANT
Electric27,191,346 27,498,136 
Natural gas308,598 301,719 
Construction work in progress689,520 736,969 
Nuclear fuel272,045 212,941 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT28,461,509 28,749,765 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization10,261,350 10,087,942 
UTILITY PLANT - NET18,200,159 18,661,823 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Other regulatory assets1,608,035 2,056,179 
Deferred fuel costs168,122 168,122 
Other39,389 35,057 
TOTAL1,815,546 2,259,358 
TOTAL ASSETS$29,980,473 $28,144,555 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

130

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)(Unaudited)
 2017 201620232022
 (In Thousands)(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$675,002
 
$200,198
Currently maturing long-term debt$1,010,000 $1,010,000 
Short-term borrowings 40,555
 3,794
Accounts payable:    Accounts payable:
Associated companies 85,920
 82,106
Associated companies90,509 356,688 
Other 347,338
 358,741
Other452,457 589,355 
Customer deposits 149,274
 148,601
Customer deposits165,813 161,666 
Taxes accruedTaxes accrued84,019 36,004 
Interest accrued 84,747
 75,598
Interest accrued95,940 101,336 
Deferred fuel costs 10,458
 48,211
Deferred fuel costs29,618 — 
Other 88,525
 80,013
Other99,325 72,525 
TOTAL 1,481,819
 997,262
TOTAL2,027,681 2,327,574 
    
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 2,998,156
 2,691,118
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued2,368,751 2,374,878 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 123,088
 126,741
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits95,555 97,868 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - netRegulatory liability for income taxes - net328,105 337,836 
Other regulatory liabilities 808,914
 880,974
Other regulatory liabilities1,265,439 1,037,962 
Decommissioning 1,125,732
 1,082,685
Decommissioning1,780,412 1,736,801 
Accumulated provisions 304,441
 310,772
Accumulated provisions320,223 316,314 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 709,396
 780,278
Pension and other postretirement liabilities377,536 389,631 
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $89,430 as of September 30, 2017 and $99,217 as of December 31, 2016) 5,492,494
 5,612,593
Long-term debtLong-term debt9,677,807 9,688,922 
Other 159,711
 137,039
Other429,271 343,321 
TOTAL 11,721,932
 11,622,200
TOTAL16,643,099 16,323,533 
    
Commitments and Contingencies    Commitments and Contingencies
    
EQUITY    EQUITY
Member's equity 5,444,080
 5,130,251
Member's equity11,209,667 9,406,343 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (49,492) (48,442)
Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAccumulated other comprehensive income52,811 55,370 
Noncontrolling interestsNoncontrolling interests47,215 31,735 
TOTAL 5,394,588
 5,081,809
TOTAL11,309,693 9,493,448 
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$18,598,339
 
$17,701,271
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$29,980,473 $28,144,555 
    
See Notes to Financial Statements.    See Notes to Financial Statements.

131
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 Member’s
Equity
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
 (In Thousands)
      
Balance at December 31, 2015
$4,793,724
 
($56,412) 
$4,737,312
      
Net income554,437
 
 554,437
Other comprehensive loss
 (725) (725)
Distributions declared on common equity(215,000) 
 (215,000)
Other(22) 
 (22)
      
Balance at September 30, 2016
$5,133,139
 
($57,137) 
$5,076,002
      
      
Balance at December 31, 2016
$5,130,251
 
($48,442) 
$5,081,809
      
Net income405,141
 
 405,141
Other comprehensive loss
 (1,050) (1,050)
Distributions declared on common equity(91,250) 
 (91,250)
Other(62) 
 (62)
      
Balance at September 30, 2017
$5,444,080
 
($49,492) 
$5,394,588
      
See Notes to Financial Statements.     



ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Noncontrolling InterestsMember’s
Equity
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$— $8,172,294 $8,278 $8,180,572 
Net income— 150,860 — 150,860 
Other comprehensive loss— — (613)(613)
Distributions declared on common equity— (125,000)— (125,000)
Other— (13)— (13)
Balance at March 31, 2022— 8,198,141 7,665 8,205,806 
Net income258 316,401 — 316,659 
Other comprehensive loss— — (491)(491)
Contributions from parent— 1,000,000 — 1,000,000 
Beneficial interest in storm trust31,636 — — 31,636 
Other— (13)— (13)
Balance at June 30, 2022$31,894 $9,514,529 $7,174 $9,553,597 
Balance at December 31, 2022$31,735 $9,406,343 $55,370 $9,493,448 
Net income554 243,470 — 244,024 
Other comprehensive loss— — (786)(786)
Contributions from parent— 1,457,676 — 1,457,676 
Common equity distributions— (160,250)— (160,250)
Beneficial interest in storm trust14,577 — — 14,577 
Distribution to LURC(470)— — (470)
Other— (28)— (28)
Balance at March 31, 202346,396 10,947,211 54,584 11,048,191 
Net income819 262,441 — 263,260 
Other comprehensive loss— — (1,773)(1,773)
Other— 15 — 15 
Balance at June 30, 2023$47,215 $11,209,667 $52,811 $11,309,693 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

132
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$411
 
$413
 
($2) 
Commercial 285
 273
 12
 4
Industrial 428
 361
 67
 19
Governmental 19
 18
 1
 6
Total retail 1,143
 1,065
 78
 7
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 69
 116
 (47) (41)
Non-associated companies 23
 13
 10
 77
Other 45
 46
 (1) (2)
Total 
$1,280
 
$1,240
 
$40
 3
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 4,301
 4,635
 (334) (7)
Commercial 3,228
 3,363
 (135) (4)
Industrial 7,627
 7,345
 282
 4
Governmental 208
 208
 
 
Total retail 15,364
 15,551
 (187) (1)
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 1,164
 2,360
 (1,196) (51)
Non-associated companies 616
 335
 281
 84
Total 17,144
 18,246
 (1,102) (6)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$911
 
$913
 
($2) 
Commercial 716
 694
 22
 3
Industrial 1,147
 1,006
 141
 14
Governmental 51
 50
 1
 2
Total retail 2,825
 2,663
 162
 6
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 204
 310
 (106) (34)
Non-associated companies 53
 37
 16
 43
Other 135
 156
 (21) (13)
Total 
$3,217
 
$3,166
 
$51
 2
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 10,154
 10,608
 (454) (4)
Commercial 8,497
 8,622
 (125) (1)
Industrial 22,272
 21,662
 610
 3
Governmental 595
 602
 (7) (1)
Total retail 41,518
 41,494
 24
 
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 3,399
 6,104
 (2,705) (44)
Non-associated companies 1,280
 1,321
 (41) (3)
Total 46,197
 48,919
 (2,722) (6)
         



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net IncomeEarnings Applicable to Member’s Equity


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net income remained relatively unchanged, decreasing by $0.1 million, because lower net revenue was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income decreased $3.9Earnings increased $12.9 million primarily due to lower net revenuehigher retail electric price and higher depreciation and amortization expenses, partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower volume/weather, higher depreciation and loweramortization expenses, and higher interest expense.


Net Revenue

Third Quarter 2017Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Third Quarter 2016Six Months Ended June 30, 2022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-relatedEarnings increased $5.7 million primarily due to higher retail electric price, partially offset by lower volume/weather, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  higher interest expense.

Operating Revenues

Second Quarter 2023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:
2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$405.5 
$214.7
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(9.320.0 )
Retail electric price(5.027.7 )
OtherVolume/weather0.9(8.1)
2017 net revenue
2023 operating revenues$201.3445.1

The volume/weatherEntergy Mississippi’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by an increase in residential and commercial usage resulting from a 1% increase in the average number of residential and commercial customers.associated with these items.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to lower storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the November 2016 billing cycle. Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the storm damage riderincreases in formula rate plan rates effective with the September 2017 billing cycle. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in the energy efficiency rider.  See Note 2 to the financial statements hereinAugust 2022 and in the Form 10-K for further discussion on the storm damage rider.


126

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to the nine months ended September 30, 2016:

Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$541.2
Volume/weather(19.6)
Retail electric price6.6
Other1.4
2017 net revenue
$529.6
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by an increase of 40 GWh, or 2%, in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry, an increase in usage by the mid to small industrial sector, and new customers in the wood products industry, partially offset by a decrease in demand for existing customers.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $19.4 million net annual increase in rates, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016 and an increase in the energy efficiency rider. The increase was partially offset by lower storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the November 2016 billing cycle. Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the September 2017 billing cycle.April 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filings.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales.


133

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Total electric energy sales for Entergy Mississippi for the storm damage rider.three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential1,323 1,419 (7)
Commercial1,105 1,167 (5)
Industrial565 593 (5)
Governmental99 106 (7)
  Total retail3,092 3,285 (6)
Sales for resale:
  Non-associated companies1,209 677 79 
Total4,301 3,962 

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s operating revenues.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the six months ended June 30, 2023 to the six months ended June 30, 2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2022 operating revenues$754.5 
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income85.6 
Retail electric price39.8 
Volume/weather(22.3)
2023 operating revenues$857.6

Entergy Mississippi’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to increases in formula rate plan rates effective August 2022 and April 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filings.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales.


134

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Total electric energy sales for Entergy Mississippi for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential2,412 2,714 (11)
Commercial2,120 2,188 (3)
Industrial1,132 1,154 (2)
Governmental192 201 (4)
  Total retail5,856 6,257 (6)
Sales for resale:
  Non-associated companies2,773 1,212 129 
Total8,629 7,469 16 

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s operating revenues.

Other Income Statement Variances


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to to:

a decrease of $6.1$2.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expensescompensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower long-termhealth and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023 and a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service agreement costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $4.8$1.7 million in storm damage provisions. transmission costs allocated by MISO; and
a decrease of $1.7 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work, including during plant outages, performed in 2023 as compared to 2022 and lower non-nuclear labor costs.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and increases in local franchise taxes.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Sunflower Solar facility, which was placed in service in September 2022.

Other income decreased primarily due to lower interest income from carrying costs related to the deferred fuel balance.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $300 million of 5.0% Series mortgage bonds in May 2023 and the $150 million unsecured term loan drawn in June 2022.

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest reflects the earnings or losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest partner of the tax equity partnership for the Sunflower Solar facility under HLBV accounting. Entergy Mississippi recorded a regulatory charge of $3.6 million in second quarter 2023 to defer the difference between the losses allocated to the tax equity partner under the HLBV method of accounting and the earnings/losses that would have been allocated to the tax equity partner under its respective ownership percentage in

135

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
the partnership. See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the HLBV method of accounting.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $4.4 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023, a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities, and a revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter of 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs; and
a decrease of $3.5 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO.

The decrease was partially offset by:

an increase of $1.7 million in power delivery expenses primarily due to higher reliability costs and higher vegetation maintenance costs;
an increase of $1.6 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher long term service agreement expenses; and
several individually insignificant items.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and increases in local franchise taxes.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Sunflower Solar facility, which was placed in service in September 2022.

Other income decreased primarily due to lower interest income from carrying costs related to the deferred fuel balance.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the $150 million unsecured term loan drawn in June 2022 and the issuance of $300 million of 5.0% Series mortgage bonds in May 2023.

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest reflects the earnings or losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest partner of the tax equity partnership for the Sunflower Solar facility under HLBV accounting. Entergy Mississippi recorded a regulatory charge of $5.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 to defer the difference between the losses allocated to the tax equity partner under the HLBV method of accounting and the earnings/losses that would have been allocated to the tax equity partner under its respective ownership percentage in the partnership. See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the HLBV method of accounting.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 25% for the second quarter 2023 and 24.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2023. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2023 and the six months ended June 30, 2023 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

136

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The effective income tax rates were 22% for the second quarter 2022 and 21.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

Income Tax Legislation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Income Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$16,979 $47,627 
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities173,548 20,404 
Investing activities(276,717)(295,818)
Financing activities94,643 253,895 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(8,526)(21,519)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$8,453 $26,108 

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $153.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion on stormof fuel and purchased power cost recovery.recovery;

higher collections from customers; and
the timing of payments to vendors.

The decreaseincrease was partially offset by an increase of $1.6 million in energy efficiency costs.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $6.6$10.8 million in storm damage provisions. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein andspending in the Form 10-K for a discussion on storm cost recovery; and
a decrease of $3.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs, partially offset by a higher scope of work done in 20172023 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The decrease was partially offset by2022 and an increase of $3.5$9.2 million in energy efficiency costs.interest paid.


127

137

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plants in service.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the refinancing at lower interest rates of certain first mortgage bonds in 2016 and the retirement, at maturity, of $125 million of 3.25% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2016. See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details of long-term debt.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 37.8% for the third quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

The effective income tax rate was 38.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rates were 38.6% for the third quarter 2016 and 36.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The difference in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$76,834
 
$145,605
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities129,314
 141,960
Investing activities(300,966) (244,814)
Financing activities94,867
 265,513
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(76,785) 162,659
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$49
 
$308,264

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $12.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and the timing of payments to vendors. The decrease was partially offset by income tax refunds of $15.1 million in 2017 compared to income tax payments of $3.9 million in 2016. Entergy Mississippi received state income tax refunds of $15.1 million in 2017 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement. The income tax refunds in 2017 resulted from the carryback of net operating losses.


128

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $56.2decreased $19.1 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to:to the initial payment of approximately $105.1 million in May 2022 as compared to the substantial completion payment of approximately $30.4 million in April 2023 for the purchase of the Sunflower Solar facility by a consolidated tax equity partnership. The decrease was partially offset by:


an increase of $53.1$36.7 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performedincreased spending on various transmission projects in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;2023;
an increase of $18.5 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
an increase of $13.1 million in storm spending in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016; and
an increase of $9.1$11.2 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scopeincreased investment in the reliability and infrastructure of non-storm related work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.Entergy Mississippi’s distribution system; and

The increase was partially offset by money pool activity.


Decreases in Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool decreased $10.6$26.9 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to increasing $25decreasing by $37.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the UtilityUtility’s subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $170.6$159.3 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to:

the repayment, prior to the net issuancematurity, of $291.6$250 million of long-term debt3.10% Series mortgage bonds in 2016, partially offset by money pool activityJune 2023;
proceeds received in June 2022 from a $150 million unsecured term loan due December 2023;
borrowings of $100 million in 2022 on Entergy Mississippi’s credit facility;
the repayment, prior to maturity, in May 2023, of $50 million of an unsecured term loan due December 2023; and a decrease of $13.5
$40 million in common stock dividendsequity distributions paid in 20172023 in order to maintain Entergy Mississippi’s capital structure.

The decrease was partially offset by:

the issuance of $300 million of 5.0% Series mortgage bonds in May 2023;
capital contributions of $25.7 million received in April 2023 as compared to $9.6 million received in May 2022, both from the same periodnoncontrolling tax equity investor in 2016. The decreaseMS Sunflower Partnership, LLC and used by the partnership for payments in dividends paid was primarily becausethe acquisition of lower operating cash flow and higher capital expenditures, each discussed above.the Sunflower Solar facility. See Note 514 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailsdiscussion of long-term debt.the Sunflower Solar facility purchase; and

money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow and Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool increased by $106.2$104.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023.


See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.


138

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure


Entergy Mississippi’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital52.7 %53.4 %
Effect of subtracting cash(0.1 %)(0.2 %)
Net debt to net capital (non-GAAP)52.6 %53.2 %
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Debt to capital48.4% 50.2%
Effect of subtracting cash% (1.8%)
Net debt to net capital48.4% 48.4%


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, capitalfinance lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Mississippi uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition. The net debt to net capital ratio is a non-GAAP measure. Entergy Mississippi uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Mississippi’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


129

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resourcesin the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Mississippi is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $1.3 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy Mississippi’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
 2022
December 31,
2021
(In Thousands)
($104,624)$26,879$2,984$40,456
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
($106,180) $10,595 $50,916 $25,930


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

As of June 30, 2023, Entergy Mississippi has fourhad three separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $102.5$95 million, each of which expired in July 2023. As of June 30, 2023, there were no cash borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. Also, Entergy Mississippi has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in May 2018. NoJuly 2025. As of June 30, 2023, there were no cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of September 30, 2017.facility. In addition, Entergy Mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility primarily as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, a $12.82023, $6.7 million letterin MISO letters of credit wasand $9.2 million in non-MISO letters of credit were outstanding under Entergy Mississippi’s uncommitted letter of creditthis facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


Sunflower Solar

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2020 the MPSC issued an order approving certification of the Sunflower Solar facility and its recovery through the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, subject to certain conditions. In May 2022 both Entergy Mississippi and the tax equity investor made capital contributions to the tax equity partnership that were then used to make an initial payment of $105 million for acquisition of the facility. Commercial operation at the Sunflower Solar facility commenced in September 2022. In April 2023 both Entergy Mississippi and the tax equity investor made additional capital contributions to the tax equity partnership that were

139

Entergy Mississippi, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
then used to make the substantial completion payment of $30.4 million for acquisition of the facility. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s investment in the Sunflower Solar facility.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formulastate and local rate planregulation and fuel and purchased power costfuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.


Retail Rates

2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing


In March 2017,2023, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 20172023 test year filing and 20162022 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return on rate base for the historical 20162022 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth and projected earned return for the 20172023 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2023 test year filing shows a $39.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s earned return on rate base to the specified point of adjustment of 6.67%, within the formula rate plan bandwidth,bandwidth. The 2022 look-back filing compares actual 2022 results to the approved benchmark return on rate base and reflects the need for a $19.8 million temporary increase in formula rate plan revenues, including the refund of a $1.3 million over-recovery resulting from the demand-side management costs true-up in no change2022. In fourth quarter 2022, Entergy Mississippi recorded a regulatory asset of $18.2 million in rates.connection with the look-back feature of the formula rate plan to reflect that the 2022 estimated earned return was below the formula rate plan bandwidth. In June 2017,accordance with the provisions of the formula rate plan, Entergy Mississippi implemented a $27.9 million interim rate increase, reflecting a cap equal to 2% of 2022 retail revenues, effective in April 2023.

In May 2023, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a joint stipulation that confirmed thata 2023 test year filing resulting in a total revenue increase of $26.5 million for 2023. Pursuant to the joint stipulation, Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for both the 20162022 look-back filing and 2017 testreflected an earned return on rate base of 6.10% in calendar year were within2022, which is below the respectivelook-back bandwidth, resulting in a $19.0 million increase in the formula rate plan bandwidths.revenues on an interim basis through June 2024. Entergy Mississippi recorded a regulatory credit of $0.8 million in June 2023 to reflect the increase in the look-back regulatory asset. In addition, certain long-term service agreement and conductor handling costs were authorized for realignment from the formula rate plan to the annual power management and grid modernization riders effective January 2023, resulting in regulatory credits recorded in June 2023 of $4.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Also, the amortization of Entergy Mississippi’s COVID-19 bad debt deferral was suspended for calendar year 2023 and will resume in 2024. In June 20172023 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation which resultedwith rates effective in no change in rates. July 2023.


Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) FilingFuel and purchased power recovery


As discussed inIn June 2023 the Form 10-K, in November 2016,MPSC approved the joint stipulation agreement between Entergy Mississippi filed an application seeking a finding from the MPSC that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In May 2017and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff andfor Entergy Mississippi’s 2023 formula rate plan filing. The stipulation directed Entergy Mississippi entered intoto make a compliance filing to revise its power management cost adjustment factor, to revise its grid modernization cost adjustment factor, and filedto include a joint stipulation supporting Entergy Mississippi’srevision to reduce the net energy cost factor to a level necessary to reflect an average natural gas price of $4.50 per MMBtu. The MPSC approved the compliance filing in June 2023, effective for July 2023 bills. See “Retail Rates - 2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing” above for further discussion of the 2023 formula rate plan filing and the MPSC issued an order approving the filing without any materialjoint stipulation agreement.


130

140

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

RenewABLE Community Option
changes, finding that
In January 2022, Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interestMississippi filed its RenewABLE Community Option (Schedule RCO), an offering for qualifying non-residential customers to subscribe to renewable resource capacity to satisfy their environmental, sustainability, and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity.governance goals. The MPSC order also confirmed that Entergy Mississippi shall continue to includeapproved Schedule RCO in rate baseDecember 2022. Registration for the remaining book valueSchedule RCO launched in May 2023 and subscriptions as of existing meters that will be retired as partJune 30, 2023 totaled 16 MW of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates.40 MW available.
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The complaint is wide ranging and relates to tariffs and procedures under which Entergy Mississippi purchases power not generated in Mississippi to meet electricity demand. The defendants have denied the allegations. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery is currently in progress.

Storm Cost Recovery

See the Form 10-K for discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s storm damage provision. As of July 31, 2017, the balance in Entergy Mississippi’s accumulated storm damage provision was less than $10 million, therefore Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the monthly storm damage provision effective with September 2017 bills.

Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.


a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

141
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric 
$349,197
 
$309,739
 
$898,852
 
$820,923
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 61,681
 3,444
 146,869
 64,790
Purchased power 90,086
 87,070
 236,409
 216,814
Other operation and maintenance 57,491
 67,155
 172,199
 178,809
Taxes other than income taxes 23,568
 24,837
 71,518
 68,821
Depreciation and amortization 36,176
 34,438
 106,935
 101,746
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net (3,840) 4,483
 (13,983) (1,832)
TOTAL 265,162
 221,427
 719,947
 629,148
         
OPERATING INCOME 84,035
 88,312
 178,905
 191,775
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,566
 1,441
 6,741
 4,072
Interest and investment income 
 129
 33
 490
Miscellaneous - net (54) (849) (1,032) (2,604)
TOTAL 2,512
 721
 5,742
 1,958
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 12,713
 13,866
 37,953
 43,866
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1,048) (741) (2,681) (2,099)
TOTAL 11,665
 13,125
 35,272
 41,767
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 74,882
 75,908
 149,375
 151,966
         
Income taxes 28,337
 29,296
 57,369
 56,042
         
NET INCOME 46,545
 46,612
 92,006
 95,924
         
Preferred dividend requirements and other 238
 707
 715
 2,121
         
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$46,307
 
$45,905
 
$91,291
 
$93,803
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$445,130 $405,459 $857,558 $754,488 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale140,530 43,671 301,815 110,948 
Purchased power59,140 89,346 122,954 150,558 
Other operation and maintenance68,600 74,898 138,418 140,709 
Taxes other than income taxes35,301 32,484 71,035 65,214 
Depreciation and amortization65,346 60,618 129,375 120,702 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(25,947)23,853 (58,790)27,760 
TOTAL342,970 324,870 704,807 615,891 
OPERATING INCOME102,160 80,589 152,751 138,597 
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction2,169 1,495 4,053 2,573 
Interest and investment income1,319 34 1,783 98 
Miscellaneous - net(3,438)990 (5,521)(164)
TOTAL50 2,519 315 2,507 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense25,433 21,003 49,377 41,437 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(902)(658)(1,685)(1,123)
TOTAL24,531 20,345 47,692 40,314 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES77,679 62,763 105,374 100,790 
Income taxes19,414 13,808 26,169 21,481 
NET INCOME58,265 48,955 79,205 79,309 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(3,623)— (5,764)— 
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO MEMBER'S EQUITY$61,888 $48,955 $84,969 $79,309 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

142
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$92,006
 
$95,924
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization 106,935
 101,746
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 65,204
 43,201
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (31,085) (39,253)
Fuel inventory 8,059
 412
Accounts payable (2,644) 25,200
Taxes accrued (5,815) (765)
Interest accrued (2,366) (2,349)
Deferred fuel costs (27,344) (79,671)
Other working capital accounts (279) (1,910)
Provisions for estimated losses (10,274) 5,221
Other regulatory assets (33,323) 18,851
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (18,863) (18,871)
Other assets and liabilities (10,897) (5,776)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 129,314
 141,960
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (313,910) (223,643)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 6,741
 4,072
Changes in money pool receivable - net 10,595
 (24,986)
Change in other investments (3,185) 
Other (1,207) (257)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (300,966) (244,814)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 
 624,034
Retirement of long-term debt 
 (332,400)
Change in money pool payable - net 106,180
 
Dividends paid:    
Common stock (10,500) (24,000)
Preferred stock (715) (2,121)
Other (98) 
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 94,867
 265,513
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (76,785) 162,659
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 76,834
 145,605
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$49
 
$308,264
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$38,549
 
$44,209
Income taxes 
($15,087) 
$3,878
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$79,205 $79,309 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization129,375 120,702 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued26,736 17,628 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables(6,155)(38,137)
Fuel inventory(5,919)(5,352)
Accounts payable(32,930)23,252 
Taxes accrued(45,044)(36,021)
Interest accrued(724)498 
Deferred fuel costs149,189 (124,752)
Other working capital accounts(25,035)(36,211)
Provisions for estimated losses1,731 (194)
Other regulatory assets(39,846)3,332 
Other regulatory liabilities(55,443)15,441 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities(8,261)(8,004)
Other assets and liabilities6,669 8,913 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities173,548 20,404 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(276,530)(230,683)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction4,053 2,573 
Changes in money pool receivable - net26,879 37,472 
Payment for purchase of assets(30,433)(105,149)
Increase in other investments(686)(31)
Net cash flow used in investing activities(276,717)(295,818)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt396,861 249,746 
Retirement of long-term debt(400,000)— 
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interest25,708 9,595 
Change in money pool payable - net104,624 — 
Common equity distributions paid(40,000)— 
Other7,450 (5,446)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities94,643 253,895 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(8,526)(21,519)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period16,979 47,627 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$8,453 $26,108 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$48,771 $39,620 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

143
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$42
 
$16
Temporary cash investments 7
 76,818
Total cash and cash equivalents 49
 76,834
Accounts receivable:  
  
Customer 81,898
 51,218
Allowance for doubtful accounts (669) (549)
Associated companies 34,417
 45,973
Other 8,835
 12,006
Accrued unbilled revenues 55,983
 51,327
Total accounts receivable 180,464
 159,975
Deferred fuel costs 34,301
 6,957
Fuel inventory - at average cost 42,813
 50,872
Materials and supplies - at average cost 44,100
 41,146
Prepayments and other 14,555
 8,873
TOTAL 316,282
 344,657
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS  
  
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 4,596
 4,608
Escrow accounts 31,894
 31,783
TOTAL 36,490
 36,391
     
UTILITY PLANT  
  
Electric 4,454,890
 4,321,214
Property under capital lease 502
 1,590
Construction work in progress 234,116
 118,182
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 4,689,508
 4,440,986
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,651,270
 1,602,711
UTILITY PLANT - NET 3,038,238
 2,838,275
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS  
  
Regulatory assets:  
  
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 40,367
 38,284
Other regulatory assets 373,453
 342,213
Other 3,710
 2,320
TOTAL 417,530
 382,817
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$3,808,540
 
$3,602,140
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  


ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
 20232022
 (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and cash equivalents:  
Cash$26 $26 
Temporary cash investments8,427 16,953 
Total cash and cash equivalents8,453 16,979 
Accounts receivable:  
Customer112,206 99,504 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(2,371)(2,472)
Associated companies7,724 37,673 
Other17,369 34,564 
Accrued unbilled revenues87,090 73,473 
Total accounts receivable222,018 242,742 
Deferred fuel costs— 143,211 
Fuel inventory - at average cost21,467 15,548 
Materials and supplies - at average cost95,976 84,346 
Prepayments and other13,735 9,603 
TOTAL361,649 512,429 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS  
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)4,504 4,512 
Storm reserve escrow account34,304 33,549 
Other841 910 
TOTAL39,649 38,971 
UTILITY PLANT  
Electric7,288,046 7,079,849 
Construction work in progress236,022 170,191 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT7,524,068 7,250,040 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization2,351,620 2,264,786 
UTILITY PLANT - NET5,172,448 4,985,254 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS  
Regulatory assets:  
Other regulatory assets559,306 519,460 
Other26,680 22,650 
TOTAL585,986 542,110 
TOTAL ASSETS$6,159,732 $6,078,764 
See Notes to Financial Statements.  

144

ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)(Unaudited)
 2017 2016 20232022
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
  
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Currently maturing long-term debtCurrently maturing long-term debt$100,000 $400,000 
Accounts payable:  
  
Accounts payable:  
Associated companies 
$147,147
 
$43,647
Associated companies153,510 60,532 
Other 75,915
 80,227
Other162,222 176,162 
Customer deposits 83,682
 84,112
Customer deposits90,302 89,668 
Taxes accrued 58,225
 64,040
Taxes accrued79,861 124,905 
Interest accrued 19,287
 21,653
Interest accrued17,484 18,208 
Deferred fuel costsDeferred fuel costs5,978 — 
Other 13,589
 9,554
Other29,338 38,908 
TOTAL 397,845
 303,233
TOTAL638,695 908,383 
    
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES  
  
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 926,123
 861,331
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued810,639 780,030 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 8,811
 8,667
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits14,393 14,591 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - netRegulatory liability for income taxes - net196,612 202,058 
Other regulatory liabilitiesOther regulatory liabilities29,868 79,865 
Asset retirement cost liabilities 9,092
 8,722
Asset retirement cost liabilities8,010 7,797 
Accumulated provisions 44,166
 54,440
Accumulated provisions39,240 37,509 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 90,696
 109,551
Pension and other postretirement liabilities15,266 23,742 
Long-term debt 1,121,606
 1,120,916
Long-term debt2,228,900 1,931,096 
Other 14,238
 20,108
Other72,659 53,156 
TOTAL 2,214,732
 2,183,735
TOTAL3,415,587 3,129,844 
    
Commitments and Contingencies  
  
Commitments and Contingencies  
    
Preferred stock without sinking fund 20,381
 20,381
    
COMMON EQUITY  
  
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2017 and 2016 199,326
 199,326
Capital stock expense and other 167
 167
Retained earnings 976,089
 895,298
EQUITYEQUITY  
Member's equityMember's equity2,082,159 2,037,190 
Noncontrolling interestNoncontrolling interest23,291 3,347 
TOTAL 1,175,582
 1,094,791
TOTAL2,105,450 2,040,537 
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$3,808,540
 
$3,602,140
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$6,159,732 $6,078,764 
    
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  
See Notes to Financial Statements.  

145
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 
Common
Stock
 
Capital Stock
Expense and
Other
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
 (In Thousands)
        
Balance at December 31, 2015
$199,326
 
($690) 
$813,414
 
$1,012,050
        
Net income
 
 95,924
 95,924
Common stock dividends
 
 (24,000) (24,000)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (2,121) (2,121)
        
Balance at September 30, 2016
$199,326
 
($690) 
$883,217
 
$1,081,853
        
        
Balance at December 31, 2016
$199,326
 
$167
 
$895,298
 
$1,094,791
        
Net income
 
 92,006
 92,006
Common stock dividends
 
 (10,500) (10,500)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (715) (715)
        
Balance at September 30, 2017
$199,326
 
$167
 
$976,089
 
$1,175,582
        
See Notes to Financial Statements. 
  
  
  



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
 Noncontrolling InterestMember's EquityTotal
 (In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$— $1,839,568 $1,839,568 
Net income— 30,355 30,355 
Balance at March 31, 2022— 1,869,923 1,869,923 
Net income— 48,955 48,955 
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest9,595 — 9,595 
Balance at June 30, 2022$9,595 $1,918,878 $1,928,473 
Balance at December 31, 2022$3,347 $2,037,190 $2,040,537 
Net income (loss)(2,141)23,081 20,940 
Common equity distributions— (12,500)(12,500)
Balance at March 31, 20231,206 2,047,771 2,048,977 
Net income (loss)(3,623)61,888 58,265 
Common equity distributions— (27,500)(27,500)
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest25,708 — 25,708 
Balance at June 30, 2023$23,291 $2,082,159 $2,105,450 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

146
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$158
 
$141
 
$17
 12
Commercial 121
 102
 19
 19
Industrial 41
 34
 7
 21
Governmental 11
 10
 1
 10
Total retail 331
 287
 44
 15
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 4
 11
 (7) (64)
Other 14
 12
 2
 17
Total 
$349
 
$310
 
$39
 13
   
  
  
  
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
Residential 1,747
 1,955
 (208) (11)
Commercial 1,407
 1,477
 (70) (5)
Industrial 665
 693
 (28) (4)
Governmental 118
 128
 (10) (8)
Total retail 3,937
 4,253
 (316) (7)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 251
 384
 (133) (35)
Total 4,188
 4,637
 (449) (10)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:  
  
  
  
Residential 
$380
 
$345
 
$35
 10
Commercial 314
 275
 39
 14
Industrial 115
 97
 18
 19
Governmental 30
 29
 1
 3
Total retail 839
 746
 93
 12
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 16
 21
 (5) (24)
Other 44
 54
 (10) (19)
Total 
$899
 
$821
 
$78
 10
   
  
  
  
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 4,072
 4,325
 (253) (6)
Commercial 3,611
 3,682
 (71) (2)
Industrial 1,869
 1,829
 40
 2
Governmental 317
 328
 (11) (3)
Total retail 9,869
 10,164
 (295) (3)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 744
 759
 (15) (2)
Total 10,613
 10,923
 (310) (3)




ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net income decreased $5.2$5.7 million primarily due to lower net revenuevolume/weather, partially offset by higher retail electric price and higher taxeslower other than income taxes.operation and maintenance expenses.

NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022


Net income decreased $2.3$10.7 million primarily due to lower net revenuevolume/weather, a higher effective income tax rate, and higher taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by higher retail electric price, lower other operation and maintenance expenses, and a lower effective income tax rate.higher other income.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the changeschange in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:
2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$254.2 
$96.0
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(57.8)
Volume/weather(13.6)
Retail electric price(4.85.2 )
Volume/weather2023 operating revenues(3.3$188.0)
Other0.4
2017 net revenue
$88.3


Entergy New Orleans’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease in weather-adjusted residential and commercial usage and the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a decreaserate increase effective September 2022 in accordance with the terms of the 2022 formula rate plan filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.


147

Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Total electric energy sales for Entergy New Orleans for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential576 669 (14)
Commercial508 543 (6)
Industrial97 116 (16)
Governmental187 206 (9)
  Total retail1,368 1,534 (11)
Sales for resale:
  Non-associated companies551 605 (9)
Total1,919 2,139 (10)

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s operating revenues.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the six months ended June 30, 2023 to the six months ended June 30, 2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2022 operating revenues$452.5 
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(46.6)
Volume/weather(18.3)
Retail electric price9.2 
2023 operating revenues$396.8

Entergy New Orleans’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and capacity acquisition cost recoveryother costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to creditsthe effect of less favorable weather on residential sales and a decrease in weather-adjusted residential usage.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to customers as parta rate increase effective September 2022 in accordance with the terms of the 2022 formula rate plan filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.


148

Entergy New Orleans, internal restructuring agreementLLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Total electric energy sales for Entergy New Orleans for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential1,030 1,207 (15)
Commercial995 1,008 (1)
Industrial196 210 (7)
Governmental368 383 (4)
  Total retail2,589 2,808 (8)
Sales for resale:
  Non-associated companies1,594 1,321 21 
Total4,183 4,129 

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s operating revenues.

Other Income Statement Variances

Second Quarter 2023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $1.5 million in principle, effective withbad debt expense;
a decrease of $0.9 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the first billing cyclediscount rates used to value the benefits liabilities and lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs;
a decrease of $0.8 million in energy efficiency expenses primarily due to the timing of recovery from customers; and
several individually insignificant items.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to higher interest earned on money pool investments, partially offset by higher net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits non-service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities and the amortization of 2022 trust asset losses. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs.


149

Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Six Months Ended June 2017.30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decrease of $2.4 million in bad debt expense;
a decrease of $1.8 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities and lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher prescription drug rebates in 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of pension and other postretirement benefits costs; and
a decrease of $1 million in energy efficiency expenses primarily due to the timing of recovery from customers.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in local franchise taxes and increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to higher interest earned on money pool investments.

Interest expense increased primarily due to interest on the $34 million regulatory liability recorded when Entergy New Orleans received a refund from System Energy in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the credits associated with Entergy New Orleans’s internal restructuring.refund and the related proceedings.


Income Taxes

The volume/weather variance iseffective income tax rates were 29.4% for second quarter 2023 and 30.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2023. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2023 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the effectaccrual for state income taxes and the amortization of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales,state accumulated deferred income taxes as a result of tax rate changes, partially offset by an increase in residentialcertain book and commercial usage resulting from a 1% increasetax differences related to utility plant items.

The effective income tax rate was 27.2% for second quarter 2022. The difference in the average numbereffective income tax rate for second quarter 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of residential21% was primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and commercial electric customers.tax differences related to utility plant items.



The effective income tax rate was 23.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects of and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Income Tax Legislation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Income Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.
138

150

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Nine Months Ended September
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20162023 and 2022 were as follows:

20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$4,464 $42,862 
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities100,950 55,623 
Investing activities12,900 (81,900)
Financing activities23,057 9,766 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents136,907 (16,511)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$141,371 $26,351 

Operating Activities

Net revenue consistscash flow provided by operating activities increased $45.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

the timing of operating revenues net of: 1)payments to vendors;
the timing of recovery of fuel fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$244.4
Volume/weather(6.4)
Retail electric price(1.7)
Other1.5
2017 net revenue
$237.8

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by an increase in residential and commercial usage resulting from a 1% increase in the average number of residential and commercial electric customers.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a decrease in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider primarily due to credits to customers as part of the Entergy New Orleans internal restructuring agreement in principle, effective with the first billing cycle of June 2017. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider, as approved by the City Council, effective with the first billing cycle of March 2016, primarily related to the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016. costs. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for furthera discussion of thefuel and purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider;
higher collections from customers;
the refund of $34 million received from System Energy in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and seedepreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed with the FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the creditsrefund and the related proceedings; and
a decrease of $16.9 million in storm spending primarily due to Hurricane Ida restoration efforts in 2022.

The increase was partially offset by higher receipts from associated with companies in 2022.

Investing Activities

Entergy New Orleans’s internal restructuring.

Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2017 Comparedinvesting activities provided $12.9 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to Third Quarter 2016

Taxes other than income taxes increasedusing $81.9 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to an increasethe following activity:

money pool activity;
a decrease of $33.7 million in ad valorem taxes and higher local franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increaseddistribution construction expenditures primarily due to higher assessments, includingcapital expenditures for Hurricane Ida storm restoration efforts in 2022, partially offset by increased investment in the assessmentreliability and infrastructure of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginningEntergy New Orleans’s distribution system in 2017. Local franchise taxes increased2023; and
an increase of $9.9 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to higher electric retail revenuesincreased investment in the third quarter 2017 as compared to the third quarter 2016.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Other operationreliability and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a decreaseinfrastructure of $2.9 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to the deactivation of Michoud Units 2 and 3 effective May 2016 and higher outages costs at Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in 2016 as compared to the same period in 2017;
a decrease of $2.1 million in loss provisions;
a decrease of $1.1 million due to lower write-offs of uncollectible customer accounts; and
a decrease of $1 million in energy efficiency costs.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $3.2 million in distribution expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor, and higher vegetation maintenance.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to higher local franchise taxes and an increase in ad valorem taxes. Local franchise taxes increased primarily due to higher electric retail revenues in 2017 as compared

139

Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and SubsidiariesOrleans’s transmission system.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


to the same period in 2016. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments, including the assessment of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 36.6% for the third quarter 2017 and 36.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2017 and the nine months ended June 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.

The effective income tax rate was 36.5% for the third quarter 2016 and 38.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$103,068
 
$88,876
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities84,240
 92,823
Investing activities(116,704) (290,944)
Financing activities(41,722) 147,134
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(74,186) (50,987)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$28,882
 
$37,889

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors and lower net revenue in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease was substantially offset by the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and income tax payments of $8.5 million in 2016. Entergy New Orleans made income tax payments of $8.5 million in 2016 primarily due to state income taxes resulting from the effect of net operating loss limitations enacted by the state of Louisiana.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $174.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station for approximately $237 million in March 2016, partially offset by money pool activity. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.

IncreasesDecreases in Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool are a usesource of cash flow, and Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool increased $32.1decreased $101.8 million in 2017 compared to decreasing $9.6 million in

for the six months ended June 30, 2023
140

151

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


2016.compared to decreasing by $33.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Entergy New Orleans’sNet cash flow provided by financing activities used $41.7increased $13.3 million of cash for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to providing $147.1 million of cash for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to the following activity:

the issuanceadditional borrowings of $110$15 million of 5.50% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2016;
the issuance of $85 million of 4% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2016. Entergy New Orleans used the proceeds to pay, prior to maturity, its $33.271 million of 5.6% Series first mortgage bonds2023 on an unsecured term loan due September 2024 and to pay, prior to maturity, its $37.772 million of 5.65% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2029;
a $47.8 million capital contribution received from Entergy Corporation in March 2016 in anticipation of Entergy New Orleans’s purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station.June 2024. See Note 144 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase;herein and
$36.1 million in common stock dividends paid in 2017 as compared to $14 million in common stock dividends paid in 2016. There were no common stock dividends paid in first quarter 2016 in anticipation of the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016.

See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.


Capital Structure


Entergy New Orleans’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital52.1 %52.6 %
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.4 %)(0.6 %)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)51.7 %52.0 %
Effect of subtracting cash(5.0 %)(0.1 %)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)46.7 %51.9 %
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital49.4% 50.1%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(4.9%) (5.2%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)44.5% 44.9%
Effect of subtracting cash(2.0%) (8.0%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)42.5% 36.9%


(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans.
(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, finance lease obligations, long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion, and the long-term payable due to Entergy Louisiana.an associated company. Capital consists of debt preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. The debt to capital ratio excluding securitization bonds and net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds are non-GAAP measures. Entergy New Orleans uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy New Orleans also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy New Orleans’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


141

Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy New Orleans is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $585 million in capital investments during that period.  The estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the New Orleans Power Station discussed below; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; system improvements; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.

Entergy New Orleans’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
2022
December 31,
2021
(In Thousands)
$45,487$147,254$2,937$36,410
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$46,282 $14,215 $6,172 $15,794


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.


152

Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy New Orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $25 million scheduled to expire in November 2018.June 2024. The credit facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were no cash borrowings and a $0.8 million letterno letters of credit was outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy New Orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, a $7.1$1 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy New Orleans’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


New Orleans Power StationSystem Resilience and Storm Hardening


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2021 the City Council passed a resolution and order establishing a docket and procedural schedule with respect to system resiliency and storm hardening. In June 2016,July 2022, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determinationresponse identifying a plan for storm hardening and authorizationresiliency projects, including microgrids, to constructbe implemented over ten years at an approximate cost of $1.5 billion. In February 2023 the New Orleans Power Station,City Council approved a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility, which was retired effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017,revised procedural schedule requiring Entergy New Orleans submittedto make a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originallyfiling containing a narrowed list of proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The application included an updated cost estimate of $232 million for the 226 MW advanced combustion turbine. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million.hardening projects, with final comments on that filing due July 2023. In addition, the application renewed the commitment to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans.  In August 2017 the City Council established a procedural schedule that provided for a hearing in December 2017 with a City Council decision expected in February 2018. In October 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the New Orleans Power Station or, in one case, supporting a slightly smaller configuration of Entergy New Orleans’s alternative proposal. The commercial operation date is dependent on the alternative selected by the City Council and the receipt of other permits and approvals. 


142

April 2023, Entergy New Orleans Inc.filed the required application and Subsidiariessupporting testimony seeking City Council approval of the first phase (five years and approximately $559 million) of a ten-year infrastructure hardening plan totaling approximately $1 billion. Entergy New Orleans also sought, among other relief, City Council approval of a rider to recover from customers the costs of the infrastructure hardening plan. In July 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed comments in support of its application.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


State and Local Rate Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. The following are updates to that discussion.


Retail Rates


2023 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In April 2023, Entergy New Orleans submitted to the City Council its formula rate plan 2022 test year filing. The 2022 test year evaluation report produced an electric earned return on equity of 7.34% and a gas earned return on equity of 3.52% compared to the authorized return on equity for each of 9.35%. Entergy New Orleans seeks approval of a $25.6 million rate increase based on the formula set by the City Council in the 2018 rate case. The formula results in an increase in authorized electric revenues of $17.4 million and an increase in authorized gas revenues of $8.2 million. Entergy New Orleans also seeks to commence collecting $3.4 million in electric revenues that were previously approved by the City Council for collection through the formula rate plan. The filing was subject to review by the City Council and other parties over a 75-day review period. In July 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed a report to decrease its requested formula rate plan revenues by approximately $0.5 million to account for minor errors discovered after the filing. The City Council advisors issued a report seeking a reduction in requested formula rate plan revenues of approximately $8.3 million, combined for electric and gas, due to alleged errors. The City Council advisors proposed additional rate mitigation in the amount of $12 million through offsets to the formula rate plan rate increase by certain regulatory liabilities. The parties have until August 9, 2023 to reach an agreement on the final amount of the formula rate plan revenue increase. If no agreement is reached, Entergy New Orleans has the right to implement its requested rate subject to final resolution through a subsequent litigated proceeding. Resulting rates will be effective with the first billing cycle of September 2023 pursuant to the formula rate plan tariff. For any disputed rate adjustments, however, the City Council would set a procedural schedule that would extend the process for City Council approval of disputed rate adjustments.


153

Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Reliability Investigation

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2017,April 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution directing Entergy New Orleans to demonstrate that it has been prudent in the management and maintenance of the reliability of its distribution system. Entergy New Orleans responded to this resolution in June 2018 and filed a revised reliability plan with the City Council in July 2018. The City Council also approved a resolution that opened a prudence investigation into whether Entergy New Orleans was imprudent for not acting sooner to address outages in New Orleans and whether fines should be imposed. In January 2019, Entergy New Orleans filed a proposed implementation plan fortestimony in response to the Energy Smart program fromprudence investigation asserting that it had been prudent in managing system reliability. In April 2017 through March 2020. As part of2019 the proposal,City Council advisors filed comments and testimony asserting that Entergy New Orleans requesteddid not act prudently in maintaining and improving its distribution system reliability in recent years and recommending that a financial penalty in the range of $1.5 million to $2 million should be assessed.  Entergy New Orleans disagreed with the recommendation and submitted rebuttal testimony and rebuttal comments in June 2019. In November 2019 the City Council identifypassed a resolution that penalized Entergy New Orleans $1 million for alleged imprudence in the maintenance of its desired leveldistribution system. In December 2019, Entergy New Orleans filed suit in Louisiana state court seeking judicial review of fundingthe City Council’s resolution. In June 2022 the Orleans Civil District Court issued a written judgment that the penalty be set aside, reversed, and vacated. In August 2022 the Orleans Civil District Court issued written reasons for its judgment and also granted a post-judgment motion to remand for the program during this time period and approve a cost recovery mechanism.City Council to take actions consistent with its judgment. In April 20172023 the City Council approved an implementation plana resolution that established a procedural schedule to allow for the Energy Smart programsubmission of additional evidence regarding the penalty discussed above. In May 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed with the Orleans Civil District Court a petition for judicial review and (or alternatively) declaratory judgment of, together with a request for injunctive relief from, the City Council’s April 2017 through December 2019. The2023 resolution. In June 2023 the City Council directed thatfiled responsive pleadings requesting the $11.8 million balance reportedOrleans Civil District Court dismiss the suit as premature. Entergy New Orleans expects to file its opposition to the responsive pleadings by the applicable deadlines.

Also in August 2022 the City Council approved a resolution establishing a 30-day comment period on proposed minimum reliability standards and an associated penalty mechanism. In September 2022, Entergy New Orleans filed comments to the proposed plan including a request for Energy Smart funds be used to continue fundingan additional round of comments. In February 2023 the programCity Council approved a resolution adopting the proposed reliability standards, including a minimum annual performance level for Entergy New Orleans’s legacy customers and that the Energy Smart Algiers program continue to be funded through the Algiers fuel adjustment clause, until additional customer funding is required for the legacy customers.distribution system, as well as associated penalty mechanisms. In September 2017,April 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed a supplemental plan and proposed several optionsthe compliance filings required by the resolution for an interim cost recovery mechanism necessary to recover program costs during the period between when existing funds directed to Energy Smart programs are depleted (estimated to be June 2018) and when new rates from the anticipated 2018 combined rate case,calendar year 2023. The first year for which will include a cost recovery mechanism for Energy Smart funding, take effect (estimated to be August 2019).  Entergy New Orleans requested that the City Council approvemay assess a cost recovery mechanism prior to June 2018.penalty for distribution system reliability performance is calendar year 2024.


Internal RestructuringRenewable Portfolio Standard Rulemaking

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016,May 2021 the City Council approved the draft rule, as amended, establishing the Renewable and Clean Portfolio Standard. In May 2023, Entergy New Orleans filed an application withsubmitted its compliance demonstration report to the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would resultfor the 2022 compliance year, which describes and demonstrates Entergy New Orleans’s compliance with the Renewable and Clean Portfolio Standard in the transfer of substantially all of the assets2022 and operations ofsatisfies certain informational requirements. Entergy New Orleans to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. In May 2017requested, among other things, that the City Council adopted a resolution approvingdetermine that Entergy New Orleans achieved the proposed internal restructuring pursuant to an agreement in principle withtarget under the portfolio standard for 2022 and remains within the customer protection cost cap, and that the City Council advisorsapprove a proposal to recover costs associated with 2022 compliance. In July 2023 intervenors filed comments on the compliance demonstration report, and certain intervenors. Pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will credit retail customers $10 million in 2017, $1.4 million in the first quarter of the year after the transaction closes, and $117,500 each month in the second year after the transaction closes until such time as new base rates go into effect as a result of the anticipated 2018 base rate case. Entergy New Orleans began crediting retail customers in June 2017. In June 2017 the FERC approved the transaction and, pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will provide additional credits to retail customers of $5 million in each of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Entergy New Orleans expects to complete the internal restructuringrespond to those comments in fourth quarter 2017.August 2023.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application seeking a finding from the City Council that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In April 2017, Entergy New Orleans received intervenor testimony that was generally supportive of AMI deployment. The City Council’s advisors filed testimony in May 2017 recommending the adoption of AMI subject to certain modifications, including the denial of Entergy New Orleans’s proposed customer charge as a cost recovery mechanism. In June 2017 the procedural schedule was suspended to allow for settlement discussions. A status conference was held in October 2017, and the parties set another status conference for February 2018 with the intent to continue to pursue settlement in the interim.

Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.



143

154

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.


a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

155
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric 
$182,451
 
$185,775
 
$482,251
 
$457,317
Natural gas 16,566
 15,561
 61,977
 58,279
TOTAL 199,017
 201,336
 544,228
 515,596
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 26,082
 19,231
 79,118
 42,706
Purchased power 79,137
 82,581
 220,601
 221,689
Other operation and maintenance 26,448
 27,251
 74,256
 78,752
Taxes other than income taxes 15,135
 13,409
 41,397
 35,846
Depreciation and amortization 13,286
 13,047
 39,356
 38,719
Other regulatory charges - net 5,514
 3,538
 6,717
 6,812
TOTAL 165,602
 159,057
 461,445
 424,524
         
OPERATING INCOME 33,415
 42,279
 82,783
 91,072
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 654
 311
 1,656
 767
Interest and investment income 222
 58
 521
 157
Miscellaneous - net 39
 (92) 177
 (144)
TOTAL 915
 277
 2,354
 780
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 5,313
 5,373
 16,012
 15,730
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (229) (116) (580) (291)
TOTAL 5,084
 5,257
 15,432
 15,439
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 29,246
 37,299
 69,705
 76,413
         
Income taxes 10,717
 13,598
 25,316
 29,701
         
NET INCOME 18,529
 23,701
 44,389
 46,712
         
Preferred dividend requirements and other 241
 241
 724
 724
         
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$18,288
 
$23,460
 
$43,665
 
$45,988
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


(page left blank intentionally)

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$168,216 $224,084 $337,911 $378,730 
Natural gas19,800 30,165 58,925 73,791 
TOTAL188,016 254,249 396,836 452,521 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale18,974 54,815 70,998 98,212 
Purchased power65,929 83,088 132,549 139,558 
Other operation and maintenance38,961 43,715 72,188 77,367 
Taxes other than income taxes14,480 14,444 30,904 28,433 
Depreciation and amortization20,064 17,951 39,639 37,766 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net2,288 5,354 1,187 9,539 
TOTAL160,696 219,367 347,465 390,875 
OPERATING INCOME27,320 34,882 49,371 61,646 
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction280 (449)730 (80)
Interest and investment income2,400 68 4,451 92 
Miscellaneous - net(517)1,221 (744)950 
TOTAL2,163 840 4,437 962 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense10,003 8,698 19,622 17,392 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(136)159 (355)(40)
TOTAL9,867 8,857 19,267 17,352 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES19,616 26,865 34,541 45,256 
Income taxes5,759 7,319 10,542 10,584 
NET INCOME$13,857 $19,546 $23,999 $34,672 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

156
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$44,389
 
$46,712
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization 39,356
 38,719
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 30,834
 132,201
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (17,030) (17,409)
Fuel inventory (490) (215)
Accounts payable (4,950) 7,088
Prepaid taxes
 (4,484) (87,763)
Interest accrued 546
 1,172
Deferred fuel costs 4,258
 (16,671)
Other working capital accounts (6,750) 735
Provisions for estimated losses (1,702) 678
Other regulatory assets 10,093
 6,837
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (13,793) (13,673)
Other assets and liabilities 3,963
 (5,588)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 84,240
 92,823
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (81,143) (63,161)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 1,656
 767
Payment for purchase of plant 
 (237,335)
Investment in affiliates 
 (38)
Changes in money pool receivable - net (32,067) 9,622
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 
 3
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (406) (300)
Changes in securitization account (2,990) (502)
Change in other investments (1,754) 
Net cash flow used in investing activities (116,704) (290,944)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 
 190,697
Retirement of long-term debt (5,114) (77,094)
Capital contribution from parent 
 47,750
Dividends paid:    
Common stock (36,100) (14,000)
Preferred stock (724) (724)
Other 216
 505
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities (41,722) 147,134
     
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (74,186) (50,987)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 103,068
 88,876
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$28,882
 
$37,889
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$14,668
 
$13,613
Income taxes 
$—
 
$8,500
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$23,999 $34,672 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization39,639 37,766 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued10,247 16,265 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables23,357 9,240 
Fuel inventory3,868 (844)
Accounts payable(24,536)3,909 
Taxes accrued(657)(2,524)
Interest accrued194 (361)
Deferred fuel costs4,315 (31,599)
Other working capital accounts(14,016)(9,725)
Provisions for estimated losses3,550 6,319 
Other regulatory assets2,930 24,541 
Other regulatory liabilities30,722 (15,456)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities(2,454)(4,741)
Other assets and liabilities(208)(11,839)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities100,950 55,623 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(88,480)(115,552)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction730 (80)
Changes in money pool receivable - net101,767 33,473 
Changes in securitization account555 259 
Increase in other investments(1,672)— 
Net cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities12,900 (81,900)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt14,641 — 
Retirement of long-term debt(6,073)(5,916)
Contributions from customer for construction15,000 15,000 
Other(511)682 
Net cash flow provided by financing activities23,057 9,766 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents136,907 (16,511)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period4,464 42,862 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$141,371 $26,351 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$18,719 $17,055 
Income taxes$2 $— 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

157
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents    
Cash 
$518
 
$28
Temporary cash investments 28,364
 103,040
Total cash and cash equivalents 28,882
 103,068
Securitization recovery trust account
 4,728
 1,738
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 57,440
 43,536
Allowance for doubtful accounts (3,140) (3,059)
Associated companies 49,213
 16,811
Other 4,928
 5,926
Accrued unbilled revenues 22,124
 18,254
Total accounts receivable 130,565
 81,468
Deferred fuel costs 560
 4,818
Fuel inventory - at average cost 2,331
 1,841
Materials and supplies - at average cost 10,682
 8,416
Prepaid taxes 8,863
 4,379
Prepayments and other 15,515
 6,587
TOTAL 202,126
 212,315
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 1,016
 1,016
Storm reserve escrow account 81,843
 81,437
Other 2,414
 7,160
TOTAL 85,273
 89,613
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 1,276,279
 1,258,934
Natural gas 252,608
 240,408
Construction work in progress 49,885
 24,975
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 1,578,772
 1,524,317
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 621,488
 604,825
UTILITY PLANT - NET 957,284
 919,492
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Deferred fuel costs 4,080
 4,080
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $74,586 as of September 30, 2017 and $82,272 as of December 31, 2016) 258,013
 268,106
Other 890
 963
TOTAL 262,983
 273,149
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$1,507,666
 
$1,494,569
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$26 $27 
Temporary cash investments141,345 4,437 
Total cash and cash equivalents141,371 4,464 
Securitization recovery trust account1,680 2,235 
Accounts receivable: 
Customer68,524 93,288 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(7,653)(11,909)
Associated companies47,689 149,927 
Other5,992 6,110 
Accrued unbilled revenues35,024 37,284 
Total accounts receivable149,576 274,700 
Deferred fuel costs5,838 10,153 
Fuel inventory - at average cost2,004 5,872 
Materials and supplies - at average cost26,860 22,498 
Prepayments and other19,067 6,312 
TOTAL346,396 326,234 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)832 1,050 
Storm reserve escrow account76,723 75,000 
Other624 675 
TOTAL78,179 76,725 
UTILITY PLANT
Electric1,989,407 1,934,837 
Natural gas396,968 390,252 
Construction work in progress26,582 39,607 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT2,412,957 2,364,696 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization828,664 808,224 
UTILITY PLANT - NET1,584,293 1,556,472 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Deferred fuel costs4,080 4,080 
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $7,952 as of June 30, 2023 and $13,363 as of December 31, 2022)199,182 202,112 
Other51,549 46,778 
TOTAL254,811 252,970 
TOTAL ASSETS$2,263,679 $2,212,401 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

158

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)(Unaudited)
 2017 201620232022
 (In Thousands)(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    CURRENT LIABILITIES
Payable due to Entergy Louisiana 
$2,104
 
$2,104
Currently maturing long-term debtCurrently maturing long-term debt$185,000 $170,000 
Payable due to associated companyPayable due to associated company1,306 1,306 
Accounts payable:    Accounts payable:
Associated companies 42,408
 39,260
Associated companies43,126 53,258 
Other 26,110
 35,920
Other40,231 57,291 
Customer deposits 28,734
 28,667
Customer deposits32,299 31,826 
Taxes accruedTaxes accrued9,651 10,308 
Interest accrued 5,989
 5,443
Interest accrued8,274 8,080 
Other 9,291
 11,415
Other9,271 6,560 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 114,636
 122,809
TOTALTOTAL329,158 338,629 
    
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 369,688
 334,953
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued391,231 385,259 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 528
 622
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits16,469 16,481 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 4,133
 9,074
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net42,162 39,738 
Other regulatory liabilitiesOther regulatory liabilities49,033 20,735 
Asset retirement cost liabilities 3,024
 2,875
Asset retirement cost liabilities4,101 — 
Accumulated provisions 86,811
 88,513
Accumulated provisions90,598 87,048 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 22,957
 36,750
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $79,844 as of September 30, 2017 and $84,776 as of December 31, 2016) 423,783
 428,467
Long-term payable due to Entergy Louisiana 18,423
 18,423
Gas system rebuild insurance proceeds 
 447
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $11,745 as of June 30, 2023 and $17,697 as of December 31, 2022)Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $11,745 as of June 30, 2023 and $17,697 as of December 31, 2022)590,225 596,047 
Long-term payable due to associated companyLong-term payable due to associated company8,279 8,279 
Other 9,392
 4,910
Other15,608 17,369 
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 938,739
 925,034
TOTALTOTAL1,207,706 1,170,956 
    
Commitments and Contingencies    Commitments and Contingencies
    
Preferred stock without sinking fund 19,780
 19,780
    
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2017 and 2016 33,744
 33,744
Paid-in capital 171,544
 171,544
Retained earnings 229,223
 221,658
EQUITYEQUITY
Member's equityMember's equity726,815 702,816 
TOTAL 434,511
 426,946
TOTAL726,815 702,816 
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$1,507,666
 
$1,494,569
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$2,263,679 $2,212,401 
    
See Notes to Financial Statements.    See Notes to Financial Statements.

159
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 
Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
 (In Thousands)
        
Balance at December 31, 2015
$33,744
 
$123,794
 
$192,494
 
$350,032
        
Net income
 
 46,712
 46,712
Capital contribution from parent
 47,750
 
 47,750
Common stock dividends
 
 (14,000) (14,000)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (724) (724)
        
Balance at September 30, 2016
$33,744
 
$171,544
 
$224,482
 
$429,770
        
        
Balance at December 31, 2016
$33,744
 
$171,544
 
$221,658
 
$426,946
        
Net income
 
 44,389
 44,389
Common stock dividends
 
 (36,100) (36,100)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (724) (724)
        
Balance at September 30, 2017
$33,744
 
$171,544
 
$229,223
 
$434,511
        
See Notes to Financial Statements. 
  
  
  


ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Member's Equity
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$638,715 
Net income15,126 
Balance at March 31, 2022653,841 
Net income19,546 
Balance at June 30, 2022$673,387 
Balance at December 31, 2022$702,816 
Net income10,142 
Balance at March 31, 2023712,958 
Net income13,857 
Balance at June 30, 2023$726,815 
See Notes to Financial Statements.


160
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$82
 
$80
 
$2
 3
Commercial 63
 60
 3
 5
Industrial 9
 9
 
 
Governmental 21
 20
 1
 5
Total retail 175
 169
 6
 4
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Associated companies 
 11
 (11) (100)
Non-associated companies 3
 1
 2
 200
Other 4
 5
 (1) (20)
Total 
$182
 
$186
 
($4) (2)
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
Residential 711
 752
 (41) (5)
Commercial 634
 652
 (18) (3)
Industrial 119
 125
 (6) (5)
Governmental 217
 224
 (7) (3)
Total retail 1,681
 1,753
 (72) (4)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Associated companies 
 272
 (272) (100)
Non-associated companies 255
 28
 227
 811
Total 1,936
 2,053
 (117) (6)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:    
  
  
Residential 
$191
 
$177
 
$14
 8
Commercial 173
 155
 18
 12
Industrial 26
 24
 2
 8
Governmental 58
 52
 6
 12
Total retail 448
 408
 40
 10
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Associated companies 
 30
 (30) (100)
  Non associated companies 21
 2
 19
 950
Other 13
 17
 (4) (24)
Total 
$482
 
$457
 
$25
 5
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
Residential 1,635
 1,710
 (75) (4)
Commercial 1,690
 1,700
 (10) (1)
Industrial 322
 333
 (11) (3)
Governmental 589
 592
 (3) (1)
Total retail 4,236
 4,335
 (99) (2)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
Associated companies 
 1,070
 (1,070) (100)
Non-associated companies 1,270
 83
 1,187
 1,430
Total 5,506
 5,488
 18
 
         
         



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net income decreased $16.5$9 million primarily due to the recognition of the equity component of carrying costs as part of the securitization of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri system restoration costs in April 2022, lower net revenue,volume/weather, and higher taxes other than income taxes. The decrease was partially offset by higher retail electric price and lower other operation and maintenance expenses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Net income decreased $17.8 million primarily due to the recognition of the equity component of carrying costs as part of the securitization of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri system restoration costs in April 2022, lower volume/weather, higher taxes other than income taxes, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income decreased $23.2 million primarily due tointerest expense. The decrease was partially offset by higher retail electric price, lower net revenue, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher taxes other than income taxes, and higher other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by a lower effective income tax rate.and higher other income.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the thirdsecond quarter 20172023 to the thirdsecond quarter 2016:

2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$564.6 
$203.4
Volume/weatherFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(10.1(92.4))
Net wholesale revenueSystem restoration carrying costs(9.8(21.7))
Purchased power capacityVolume/weather(3.7(8.8))
Transmission revenueReturn of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(3.37.2 )
Retail electric price6.315.5 
Other2023 operating revenues(1.3$464.4)
2017 net revenue
$181.5

Entergy Texas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

System restoration carrying costs represent the equity component of system restoration carrying costs, recorded in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the securitization of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri system restoration costs in April 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the securitization.

161

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales andsales.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the effectsreturn of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a rider effective October 2018 in response to the enactment of the power outages caused by Hurricane Harvey, partiallyTax Cuts and Jobs Act. In the second quarter 2022, $7.2 million was returned to customers through reductions in operating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers for the second quarter 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues were offset by an increasereductions in residential usage resulting from a 1% increaseincome tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the average numberForm 10-K for discussion of residential customersregulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in demand for mid to small customers and cogeneration customers.Jobs Act.

The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Texas in August 2016.

The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts.


152

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by MISO.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an interim increase in the annual base rate, including the realignment of the costs previously being collected through the distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider to base rates, effective June 2023 and the implementation of the transmissiongeneration cost recovery factorrelate-back rider in September 2016 and an increase infor the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate in March 2017, each as approved by the PUCT.Hardin County Peaking Facility effective May 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the transmission2022 base rate case and the generation cost recovery factor rider filings.


NineTotal electric energy sales for Entergy Texas for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential1,667 1,760 (5)
Commercial1,181 1,231 (4)
Industrial2,399 2,489 (4)
Governmental67 67 — 
  Total retail5,314 5,547 (4)
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies— 89 (100)
  Non-associated companies136 161 (16)
Total5,450 5,797 (6)

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Texas’s operating revenues.


162

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016:

2022:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue2022 operating revenues
$1,037.1 
$498.6
Net wholesale revenueFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(30.7(60.3))
Purchased power capacitySystem restoration carrying costs(5.5(21.7))
Transmission revenueVolume/weather(4.1(21.4))
Retail electricReturn of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers16.013.7 
OtherRetail electric price0.524.5 
2017 net revenue2023 operating revenues
$971.9
$474.8

Entergy Texas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

System restoration carrying costs represent the equity component of system restoration carrying costs, recorded in second quarter 2022, recognized as part of the securitization of the Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri system restoration costs in April 2022. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the securitization.

The net wholesale revenuevolume/weather variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resultingthe effect of less favorable weather on residential sales.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the terminationreturn of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a rider effective October 2018 in response to the enactment of the purchased power agreements between Entergy LouisianaTax Cuts and Entergy TexasJobs Act. In the six months ended June 30, 2022, $13.7 million was returned to customers through reductions in August 2016.

The purchased power capacity variance is primarily dueoperating revenues. There was no return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to increased expenses duecustomers for the six months ended June 30, 2023. There was no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues were offset by reductions in income tax expense. See Note 2 to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts.

The transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decreasethe financial statements in the amountForm 10-K for discussion of transmission revenues allocated by MISO.regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:

an interim increase in the annual base rate, including the realignment of the costs previously being collected through the distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider to base rates, effective June 2023;
the implementation of the transmissiongeneration cost recovery factorrelate-back rider in September 2016for the Hardin County Peaking Facility effective May 2023; and
an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate ineffective March 2017, each as approved by the PUCT. 2022.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for furtherdiscussion of the 2022 base rate case and the generation cost recovery rider filings. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the transmission cost recovery factor rider filings.filing.


163

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Total electric energy sales for Entergy Texas for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
20232022% Change
(GWh)
Residential2,914 3,220 (10)
Commercial2,241 2,290 (2)
Industrial4,592 4,753 (3)
Governmental130 131 (1)
  Total retail9,877 10,394 (5)
Sales for resale:
  Associated companies— 279 (100)
  Non-associated companies239 305 (22)
Total10,116 10,978 (8)

See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Texas’s operating revenues.

Other Income Statement Variances


ThirdSecond Quarter 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter 20162022


Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:

a gain of $6.9 million on the partial sale of a service center in April 2023 as part of an eminent domain proceeding;
a decrease of $3 million in transmission costs allocated by MISO; and
several individually insignificant items.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million in non-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher long-term service agreement expenses.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increaseincreases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and a true-up to the sales and use tax accruals recordedincreases in 2016 resulting from an audit settlement.local franchise taxes.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.service and an increase in depreciation rates effective with the approval of an interim increase in the annual base rate in June 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2022 base rate case filing.



Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2023, including the Orange County Advanced Power Station project.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $325 million of 5.00% Series mortgage bonds in August 2022, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2023, including the Orange County Advanced Power Station project.

153

164

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022

Other operation and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased primarily due to:


a gain of $6.9 million on the partial sale of a service center in April 2023 as part of an increaseeminent domain proceeding;
a decrease of $2.6$5.2 million in transmission and distributioncosts allocated by MISO;
a decrease of $2.8 million in power delivery expenses primarily due to higher vegetationa lower scope of work performed in 2023 as compared to prior year and lower transmission repairs and maintenance costs;
an increasea decrease of $1.8$2.8 million in customer servicecompensation and benefits costs primarily due to lower health and welfare costs as a result of higher write-offsprescription drug rebates in 2023, a decrease in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits service costs as a result of uncollectible customer accounts;
an increase in the discount rates used to value the benefits liabilities, and a revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in the first quarter 2023. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K, Note 6 to the financial statements herein, and Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of $1.6pension and other postretirement benefits costs; and
a decrease of $2.3 million in fossil-fuelednon-nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a higherlower scope of work done during plant outagesperformed in 20172023 as compared to the same period in 2016;prior year.
an increase of $1.2 million as a result of the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO; and
an increase of $1.1 million in information technology expenses including software maintenance costs and upgrade projects.

The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $4.5 million due to the termination of transmission equalization expenses, as allocated under the System Agreement, as a result of Entergy Texas’s exit from the System Agreement in August 2016.


Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increaseincreases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and a true-up to the sales and use tax accruals recordedincreases in 2016 resulting from an audit settlement.gross receipts taxes.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.
Income Taxes

Theservice and an increase in depreciation rates effective income tax rate was 35.9% forwith the third quarter 2017. The differenceapproval of an interim increase in the effectiveannual base rate in June 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2022 base rate case filing.

Other income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% wasincreased primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related toan increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction.construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2023, including the Orange County Advanced Power Station project.


Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $325 million of 5.00% Series mortgage bonds in August 2022 and the issuance of $290.85 million of senior secured system restoration bonds in April 2022, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2023, including the Orange County Advanced Power Station project.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 34.6%rates were 19.6% for the ninesecond quarter 2023 and 19.4% for the six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023. The differencedifferences in the effective income tax rate rates for the ninesecond quarter 2023 and the six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was21% were primarily due to book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and a write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset.

The effective income tax rates were 36.2% for the third quarter 2016 and 37.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2016 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the accrual for state income taxes.

The effective income tax rates were 14.5% for the second quarter 2022 and 12.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items. See Note 10 to the allowancefinancial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for equity funds used during construction.a discussion of the effects of and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.



154

165

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Income Tax Legislation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Income Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flow


Cash flows for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$3,497 $28 
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities308,266 171,727 
Investing activities(319,798)(326,373)
Financing activities10,857 177,193 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(675)22,547 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$2,822 $22,575 
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$6,181
 
$2,182
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities192,954
 196,698
Investing activities(228,582) (251,366)
Financing activities30,949
 53,829
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(4,679) (839)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$1,502
 
$1,343


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $3.7increased $136.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to decreased net income.

The decrease was partially offset by:

the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as comparedand higher collections from customers. The increase was partially offset by the timing of payments to the same period in 2016;
income tax refundsvendors, an increase of $1.4$29.4 million in 2017 compared toincome taxes paid in 2023 as a result of higher estimated income tax payments in comparison to 2022, and an increase of $3.4 million in 2016 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement; and
a decrease of $3.3$12.2 million in interest paid in 2017 as comparedpaid. See Note 2 to the same periodfinancial statements herein and in 2016.the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery.


Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $22.8$6.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to:

money pool activity;
cash collateral of $30 million posted in 2022 to support Entergy Texas’s obligations to MISO; and
the partial sale of a decreaseservice center in April 2023 for $11 million as part of $55.7 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, partially offset by an increase in baseline work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. eminent domain proceeding.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $24.3$100.1 million in fossil-fuelednon-nuclear generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared tospending on the same period in 2016Orange County Advanced Power Station project and an increase of $9.4$31.7 million in distributiontransmission construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on digital technology improvements within the customer contact centers.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the issuance of $125 million of 2.55% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2016, partially offset by money pool activity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statementsinvestment in the Form 10-Kreliability and infrastructure of Entergy Texas's transmission system and higher capital expenditures for more details on long-term debt.storm restoration in 2023.


IncreasesDecreases in Entergy Texas’s payable toreceivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s payable toreceivable from the money pool increased by $89.3decreased $98.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to decreasing

155

166

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

to increasing by $9.7$1.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $166.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to the issuance of $290.85 million of senior secured system restoration bonds in April 2022. The activity was partially offset by money pool activity and an increase of $21.1 million in prepaid deposits related to contributions-in-aid-of-construction for generation interconnection agreements as a result of higher deposits in 2023 as compared to 2022.

Decreases in Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool decreased $79.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022.

Capital Structure


Entergy Texas’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Texas is primarily due to net income in 2023.
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital50.8 %52.0 %
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(2.4 %)(2.5 %)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)48.4 %49.5 %
Effect of subtracting cash(0.1 %)— %
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (non-GAAP) (a)48.3 %49.5 %

(a)Calculation excludes the increase in retained earnings.securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.

 
September 30,
2017
 December 31, 2016
Debt to capital56.0% 58.5%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds(7.4%) (8.3%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)48.6% 50.2%
Effect of subtracting cash% (0.1%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)48.6% 50.1%

(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of finance lease obligations and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  The debt to capital ratio excluding securitization bonds and net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds are non-GAAP measures. Entergy Texas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Texas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy Texas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Texas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.



167

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Texas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Texas is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $1.9 billion in capital investments during that period.  The estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the Montgomery County Power Station discussed below; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including initial investment to support advanced metering; system improvements; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy Texas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
2022
December 31,
2021
(In Thousands)
$899$99,468$1,643($79,594)
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
($89,312) $681 ($12,399) ($22,068)


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

156

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in August 2022.June 2028.  The credit facility permitsincludes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against 50%$30 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were no cash borrowings and $24.4$1.1 million ofin letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility.  In addition, Entergy Texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, a $19.62023, $8.8 million letterin letters of credit waswere outstanding under Entergy Texas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


Montgomery County Power Station

In October 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Montgomery County Power Station, a nominal 993 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Montgomery County, Texas on land adjacent to the existing Lewis Creek plant. The current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station is $937 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs. The independent monitor, who oversaw the request for proposal process, filed testimony and a report affirming that the Montgomery County Power Station was selected through an objective and fair request for proposal process that showed no undue preference to any proposal. In June 2017, parties to the proceeding filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. The stipulation contemplates that Entergy Texas’s level of cost-recovery for generation construction costs for Montgomery County Power Station is capped at $831 million, subject to certain exclusions such as force majeure events. The costs of the transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs included in the total current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station are not subject to the $831 million cap. Also in June 2017, the ALJ issued a proposed order and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for final decision. In July 2017 the PUCT approved the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2021.

Hurricane Harvey

In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey caused extensive damage to Entergy Texas’s service area. The storm resulted in widespread power outages and significant damage primarily to distribution infrastructure. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy Texas’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Harvey are currently estimated to be in the range of $75 million to $105 million. Based on current progress, management expects total restoration costs to be towards the lower end of the range. Entergy Texas is considering all reasonable avenues to recover storm-related costs from Hurricane Harvey, including, but not limited to, securitization or other alternative financing and traditional retail recovery on an interim and permanent basis. Storm cost recovery or financing will be subject to review by applicable regulatory authorities.

Entergy Texas has recorded accounts payable for the estimated costs incurred that were necessary to return customers to service. Entergy Texas recorded corresponding regulatory assets of approximately $13.1 million and construction work in progress of approximately $25.9 million. Entergy Texas recorded the regulatory assets in accordance with its accounting policies and based on the historic treatment of such costs in its service area because management believes that recovery through some form of regulatory mechanism is probable. Because Entergy Texas has not gone through the regulatory process regarding these storm costs, there is an element of risk, and Entergy Texas is unable to predict with certainty the degree of success it may have in its recovery initiatives, the amount of restoration costs that it may ultimately recover, or the timing of such recovery.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.



Retail Rates

2022 Base Rate Case

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2022, Entergy Texas filed a base rate case with the PUCT seeking a net increase in base rates of approximately $131.4 million. The base rate case was based on a 12-month test year ending December 31, 2021. Key drivers of the requested increase were changes in depreciation rates as the result of a depreciation study and an increase in the return on equity. In addition, Entergy Texas included capital additions placed into service for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2021, including those additions reflected in the then-effective distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider, all of which have been reset to zero as a result of this proceeding.

In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed on behalf of the parties an unopposed settlement resolving all issues in the proceeding, except for issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and Entergy Texas filed an agreed motion for interim rates, subject to refund or surcharge to the extent that the interim rates differ from the final approved rates. The unopposed settlement reflected a base rate increase to be effective and relate back to December 2022 of $54 million, exclusive of, and incremental to, the costs being realigned from the distribution and transmission cost recovery factor riders and the generation cost recovery rider and $4.8 million of rate case expenses to be recovered through a rider over a period of 36 months. The base rate increase of $54 million includes updated depreciation rates and a total annual revenue requirement of $14.5 million for the accrual of a self-insured storm reserve and the recovery of the regulatory assets for the pension and postretirement benefits expense deferral, costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and retired non-advanced metering system electric meters. In May 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted the motion for interim rates, which became
157

168

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Retail Rates

2011 Rate Case

Seeeffective in June 2023. Additionally, the Form 10-KALJ remanded the proceeding, except for discussion ofthe issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, to the PUCT to consider the settlement. In June 2023 the ALJ issued a proposal for decision related to the electric vehicle charging infrastructure issues and which noted recent legislation enacted which permits electric utilities to own and operate such infrastructure. The ALJ’s proposal for decision deferred to the PUCT regarding whether it is appropriate for any vertically integrated electric utility, or Entergy Texas’s 2011 rate case. As discussedTexas specifically, to own electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and in the Form 10-K, several parties, including Entergy Texas, appealed various aspectsevent that the PUCT decided ownership is permissible, the ALJ recommended approval of the PUCT’s orderproposed tariff to the Travis County District Court. In October 2014 the Travis County District Court issued an order upholding the PUCT’s decision except as to the line-loss factor issue referenced in the Form 10-K, which was found in favor of Entergy Texas. In November 2014, Entergy Texascharge host customers for utility-owned and other parties, including the PUCT, appealed the Travis County District Court decision to the Third Court of Appeals. Oral argument before the court panel was held in September 2015. In April 2016 the Third Court of Appeals issued its opinion affirming the District Court’s decisionoperated electric vehicle charging infrastructure sited on all points. Entergy Texascustomer premises and other parties petitioned the Texas Supreme Court to hear its appeal of the Third Court’s ruling. In September 2017 the Texas Supreme Court denied the petitions for review. Entergy Texas filed a motion for rehearing of the Texas Supreme Court’s denial of the petitionproposed tariff to temporarily adjust billing demand charges for review. That motion is pending.

Other Filings

separately metered electric vehicle charging infrastructure, citing cost-shifting concerns. In September 2016, Entergy TexasJuly 2023 the parties filed withexceptions and replies to exceptions to the proposal for decision. At its August 3, 2023 open meeting, the PUCT a requestvoted to amend its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) rider. The proposed amended TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $29.5 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers. This amount includes the approximately $10.5 million annually that Entergy Texas is currently authorized to collect through the TCRF rider. In December 2016, Entergy Texas and the PUCT reachedissue a settlement agreeing to the amended TCRF annual revenue requirement of $29.5 million. The PUCT approved the settlement and issued a final order in March 2017. Entergy Texas implemented the amended TCRF rider beginning with bills covering usage on and after March 20, 2017.

In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application to amend its distribution cost recovery factor (DCRF) rider by increasing the total collection from $8.65 million to approximately $19 million. In July 2017, Entergy Texas, the PUCT, and the parties in the proceeding entered into an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in an amended DCRF annual revenue requirement of $18.3 million, with the resulting rates effective for usage no later than October 1, 2017. In September 2017 the PUCT issued its final order approving the unopposed stipulationsettlement and settlement agreement. The amended DCRF rider rates became effectiveto consider the issues related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure addressed in the ALJ’s proposal for usage on and after September 1, 2017.decision in a separate future proceeding.


Fuel and purchased power cost recoveryGeneration Cost Recovery Rider


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016,August 2022 the PUCT approved a unanimous settlement agreement adjusting Entergy Texas’s generation cost recovery rider to recover an annual revenue requirement of approximately $92.8 million related to Entergy Texas’s actual investment in the acquisition of the Hardin County Peaking Facility, and rates became effective. In September 2022, Entergy Texas filed a relate-back rider designed to collect over three months an additional approximately $5.7 million, which is the revenue requirement, plus carrying costs, associated with Entergy Texas’s acquisition of Hardin County Peaking Facility from June 2021 through August 2022 when the updated revenue requirement took effect. In April 2023 the PUCT approved Entergy Texas’s as-filed request with rates effective over three months beginning in May 2023.

COVID-19 Orders

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2020 the PUCT authorized electric utilities to record as a regulatory asset expenses resulting from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In future proceedings, the PUCT will consider whether each utility's request for recovery of these regulatory assets is reasonable and necessary, the appropriate period of recovery, and any amount of carrying costs thereon. As part of its 2022 base rate case filing, Entergy Texas requested recovery of its regulatory asset over a three-year period beginning December 2022. The base rate increase of $54 million in the unopposed settlement filed in the base rate case proceeding in May 2023, which is awaiting PUCT approval, includes an annual revenue requirement of $3.4 million related to recovery of the regulatory asset for costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Entergy Texas began recovery of the regulatory asset with the interim increase in the annual base rate effective in June 2023.

Fuel and purchased power recovery

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2022, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the period from April 1, 20132019 through March 31, 2016. In December 2016,2022. During the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas entered into a stipulationincurred approximately $1.7 billion in eligible fuel and settlement agreement resulting in a $6 million disallowance not associated with any particular issue raisedpurchased power expenses, net of certain revenues credited to such expenses and a refundother adjustments. As of the over-recoveryend of the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas’s cumulative under-recovery balance of $21was approximately $103.1 million, including interest, which Entergy Texas requested authority to carry over as of November 30, 2016, to most customersthe beginning balance for the subsequent reconciliation period beginning April 2017 through June 2017. The fuel reconciliation settlement was2022, pending future surcharges or refunds as approved by the PUCT. In November 2022 the PUCT referred the proceeding to the State Office of Administrative Hearings. In March 2023 municipal intervenors filed testimony proposing a $5.2 million disallowance for fuel purchased during Winter Storm Uri. The PUCT staff proposed no disallowance. Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony in March 2017April 2023. In May 2023, Entergy Texas filed, and the refunds were made.

ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted, a joint motion to abate the proceeding to give parties additional time to finalize a settlement and cancelling the hearing on the merits previously scheduled for May 2023. In June 2017,July 2023, Entergy Texas filed an application for a fuel refund of approximately $30.7 million for the months of December 2016 through April 2017. For most customers, the refunds flowed through bills for the months of July 2017 through September 2017. The fuel refund was approved by the PUCT in August 2017.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing

In April 2017 the Texas legislature enacted legislation that extends statutory support for AMI deployment to Entergy Texas and directs that if Entergy Texas elects to deploy AMI, it shall do so as rapidly as practicable. In July 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking an order from the PUCT approving Entergy Texas’s deployment of AMI. Entergy Texas proposed to replace existing meters with advanced meters that enable two-way data communication; design and build a secure and reliable network to support such communications; and implement support

unopposed
158

169

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

systems. AMI is intendedsettlement, supporting testimony, and an agreed motion to serve asadmit evidence and remand the foundation of Entergy Texas’s modernized power grid. The filing identified a number of quantified and unquantified benefits, withproceeding to the PUCT. Pursuant to the unopposed settlement, Entergy Texas showing that its AMI deploymentwould receive no disallowance of fuel costs incurred over the three-year reconciliation period and retain $9.3 million in margins from off-system sales made during the reconciliation period. In July 2023 the ALJ with the State Office of Administrative Hearings granted the motion to admit evidence and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for consideration of the unopposed settlement. A PUCT decision is expected to produce nominal net operational cost savings to customers of $33 million. Entergy Texas also sought to continue to include in rate base the remaining book value, approximately $41 million at December 31, 2016, of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. Entergy Texas proposed a seven-year depreciable life for the new advanced meters, the three-year deployment of which is expected to begin in 2019. Entergy Texas also proposed a surcharge tariff to recover the reasonable and necessary costs it has and will incur under the deployment plan for the full deployment of advanced meters. Further, Entergy Texas is seeking approval of fees that would be charged to customers who choose to opt out of receiving service through an advanced meter and instead receive electric service with a non-standard meter. Subject to approval by the PUCT, deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in 2018. In October 2017, Entergy Texas and other parties entered into and filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. PUCT action on the stipulation and settlement agreement remains pending. Entergy Texas expects a decision from the PUCT by December 2017.September 2023.

Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.


Nuclear Matters

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for discussion of nuclear matters.

Industrial and Commercial Customers


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Industrial and Commercial Customers” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.


Nuclear MattersEnvironmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Texas’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.

a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

170
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric 
$432,909
 
$442,085
 
$1,175,324
 
$1,233,311
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 60,292
 21,919
 164,447
 185,801
Purchased power 163,532
 189,213
 474,241
 486,696
Other operation and maintenance 51,917
 50,536
 162,400
 157,706
Taxes other than income taxes 20,811
 17,486
 59,506
 54,081
Depreciation and amortization 29,788
 27,412
 87,272
 79,526
Other regulatory charges - net 27,619
 27,555
 61,879
 62,229
TOTAL 353,959
 334,121
 1,009,745
 1,026,039
         
OPERATING INCOME 78,950
 107,964
 165,579
 207,272
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 1,849
 1,472
 4,762
 6,174
Interest and investment income 244
 221
 656
 689
Miscellaneous - net 1,298
 (256) 485
 (726)
TOTAL 3,391
 1,437
 5,903
 6,137
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 21,714
 22,416
 64,949
 65,993
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1,134) (954) (2,896) (4,008)
TOTAL 20,580
 21,462
 62,053
 61,985
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 61,761
 87,939
 109,429
 151,424
         
Income taxes 22,173
 31,806
 37,886
 56,671
         
NET INCOME 
$39,588
 
$56,133
 
$71,543
 
$94,753
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$464,430 $564,591 $971,936 $1,037,073 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale63,526 60,855 231,056 134,775 
Purchased power112,883 195,016 220,641 356,106 
Other operation and maintenance63,071 72,589 127,501 147,566 
Taxes other than income taxes28,717 23,482 56,713 43,931 
Depreciation and amortization66,009 57,248 125,400 113,309 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net1,526 22,399 12,450 35,845 
TOTAL335,732 431,589 773,761 831,532 
OPERATING INCOME128,698 133,002 198,175 205,541 
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction6,760 3,163 11,849 5,759 
Interest and investment income846 347 2,263 535 
Miscellaneous - net(1,941)(409)(1,502)(102)
TOTAL5,665 3,101 12,610 6,192 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense26,847 23,101 53,809 44,013 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(2,517)(1,067)(4,413)(1,932)
TOTAL24,330 22,034 49,396 42,081 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES110,033 114,069 161,389 169,652 
Income taxes21,576 16,584 31,259 21,764 
NET INCOME88,457 97,485 130,130 147,888 
Preferred dividend requirements518 518 1,036 1,036 
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK$87,939 $96,967 $129,094 $146,852 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

171
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$71,543
 
$94,753
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization 87,272
 79,526
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 36,252
 (7,605)
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (30,030) (40,678)
Fuel inventory (7,371) 268
Accounts payable 24,711
 (74)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 1,122
 55,121
Interest accrued (7,207) (9,453)
Deferred fuel costs (3,134) (6,472)
Other working capital accounts (8,455) (9,786)
Provisions for estimated losses (1,460) (3,318)
Other regulatory assets 59,549
 69,324
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (22,978) (21,092)
Other assets and liabilities (6,860) (3,816)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 192,954
 196,698
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (243,226) (264,394)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 4,879
 6,266
Insurance proceeds received for property damages 2,431
 
Change in money pool receivable - net 681
 
Changes in securitization account 6,653
 6,762
Net cash flow used in investing activities (228,582) (251,366)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 
 123,502
Retirement of long-term debt (58,076) (55,764)
Changes in money pool payable - net 89,312
 (9,669)
Other (287) (4,240)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 30,949
 53,829
     
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (4,679) (839)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 6,181
 2,182
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$1,502
 
$1,343
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$70,237
 
$73,570
Income taxes 
($1,446) 
$3,443
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    



























(Page left blank intentionally)

172

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$1,472
 
$1,216
Temporary cash investments 30
 4,965
Total cash and cash equivalents 1,502
 6,181
Securitization recovery trust account 30,798
 37,451
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 86,860
 71,803
Allowance for doubtful accounts (552) (828)
Associated companies 41,002
 39,447
Other 12,982
 14,756
Accrued unbilled revenues 53,962
 39,727
Total accounts receivable 194,254
 164,905
Fuel inventory - at average cost 44,548
 37,177
Materials and supplies - at average cost 40,294
 36,631
Prepayments and other 24,194
 18,599
TOTAL 335,590
 300,944
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Investments in affiliates - at equity 538
 600
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 376
 376
Other 19,126
 18,801
TOTAL 20,040
 19,777
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 4,431,291
 4,274,069
Construction work in progress 153,679
 111,227
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 4,584,970
 4,385,296
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,566,743
 1,526,057
UTILITY PLANT - NET 3,018,227
 2,859,239
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 104,915
 105,816
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $330,669 as of September 30, 2017 and $384,609 as of December 31, 2016) 681,508
 740,156
Other 8,303
 7,149
TOTAL 794,726
 853,121
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$4,168,583
 
$4,033,081
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$130,130 $147,888 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization125,400 113,309 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued23,480 24,421 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables12,534 (55,237)
Fuel inventory(18,082)16,888 
Accounts payable(5,725)79,801 
Taxes accrued(45,549)(7,158)
Interest accrued(604)1,923 
Deferred fuel costs98,042 (141,192)
Other working capital accounts3,129 2,388 
Provisions for estimated losses455 (10)
Other regulatory assets(19,688)(143,294)
Other regulatory liabilities(9,929)(14,444)
Effect of securitization on regulatory asset— 153,383 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities(4,191)(9,475)
Other assets and liabilities18,864 2,536 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities308,266 171,727 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(448,550)(304,702)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction11,849 5,759 
Proceeds from sale of assets11,000 — 
Litigation proceeds from settlement agreement— 4,134 
Changes in money pool receivable - net98,569 (1,643)
Changes in securitization account7,248 79 
Decrease (increase) in other investments86 (30,000)
Net cash flow used in investing activities(319,798)(326,373)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt— 286,842 
Retirement of long-term debt(8,856)(29,064)
Change in money pool payable - net— (79,594)
Preferred stock dividends paid(1,036)(1,024)
Other20,749 33 
Net cash flow provided by financing activities10,857 177,193 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(675)22,547 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period3,497 28 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$2,822 $22,575 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$53,019 $40,816 
Income taxes$30,500 $1,085 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

173
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 
$142,695
 
$47,867
Other 106,117
 77,342
Customer deposits 44,141
 44,419
Taxes accrued 16,473
 15,351
Interest accrued 18,770
 25,977
Deferred fuel costs 51,409
 54,543
Other 10,445
 9,388
TOTAL 390,050
 274,887
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 1,061,320
 1,027,647
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 12,221
 12,934
Other regulatory liabilities 7,002
 8,502
Asset retirement cost liabilities 6,742
 6,470
Accumulated provisions 6,124
 7,584
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 44,359
 67,313
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $371,422 as of September 30, 2017 and $429,043 as of December 31, 2016) 1,451,643
 1,508,407
Other 48,585
 50,343
TOTAL 2,637,996
 2,689,200
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2017 and 2016 49,452
 49,452
Paid-in capital 481,994
 481,994
Retained earnings 609,091
 537,548
TOTAL 1,140,537
 1,068,994
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$4,168,583
 
$4,033,081
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$26 $500 
Temporary cash investments2,796 2,997 
Total cash and cash equivalents2,822 3,497 
Securitization recovery trust account3,631 10,879 
Accounts receivable:
Customer81,011 115,955 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(1,708)(2,352)
Associated companies7,884 115,549 
Other25,733 21,587 
Accrued unbilled revenues95,924 69,208 
Total accounts receivable208,844 319,947 
Deferred fuel costs160,073 258,115 
Fuel inventory - at average cost44,832 26,750 
Materials and supplies - at average cost94,414 93,031 
Prepayments and other13,764 20,568 
TOTAL528,380 732,787 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates - at equity237 250 
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)376 376 
Other19,196 18,975 
TOTAL19,809 19,601 
UTILITY PLANT
Electric7,626,619 7,409,461 
Construction work in progress613,969 339,139 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT8,240,588 7,748,600 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization2,257,215 2,135,400 
UTILITY PLANT - NET5,983,373 5,613,200 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $260,786 as of June 30, 2023 and $269,523 as of December 31, 2022)598,370 578,682 
Other96,391 99,694 
TOTAL694,761 678,376 
TOTAL ASSETS$7,226,323 $7,043,964 
See Notes to Financial Statements.  

174

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
 (In Thousands)
        
Balance at December 31, 2015
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$430,010
 
$961,456
        
Net income
 
 94,753
 94,753
        
Balance at September 30, 2016
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$524,763
 
$1,056,209
        
        
Balance at December 31, 2016
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$537,548
 
$1,068,994
        
Net income
 
 71,543
 71,543
        
Balance at September 30, 2017
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$609,091
 
$1,140,537
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       


ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies$57,241 $70,321 
Other245,062 201,982 
Customer deposits39,666 38,764 
Taxes accrued47,484 93,033 
Interest accrued23,324 23,928 
Other14,068 16,963 
TOTAL426,845 444,991 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued774,147 744,227 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits8,337 8,711 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net124,742 132,647 
Other regulatory liabilities43,223 45,247 
Asset retirement cost liabilities11,428 11,121 
Accumulated provisions8,048 7,593 
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $266,389 as of June 30, 2023 and $275,064 as of December 31, 2022)2,888,075 2,895,913 
Other132,923 74,053 
TOTAL3,990,923 3,919,512 
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2023 and 202249,452 49,452 
Paid-in capital1,050,125 1,050,125 
Retained earnings1,670,228 1,541,134 
Total common shareholder's equity2,769,805 2,640,711 
Preferred stock without sinking fund38,750 38,750 
TOTAL2,808,555 2,679,461 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$7,226,323 $7,043,964 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

175
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$202
 
$196
 
$6
 3
Commercial 101
 91
 10
 11
Industrial 97
 75
 22
 29
Governmental 6
 6
 
 
Total retail 406
 368
 38
 10
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 18
 52
 (34) (65)
Non-associated companies 4
 13
 (9) (69)
Other 5
 9
 (4) (44)
Total 
$433
 
$442
 
($9) (2)
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 1,839
 1,989
 (150) (8)
Commercial 1,279
 1,336
 (57) (4)
Industrial 2,018
 1,948
 70
 4
Governmental 73
 75
 (2) (3)
Total retail 5,209
 5,348
 (139) (3)
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 386
 1,187
 (801) (67)
Non-associated companies 238
 354
 (116) (33)
Total 5,833
 6,889
 (1,056) (15)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2017 2016 (Decrease) %
  (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:        
Residential 
$482
 
$461
 
$21
 5
Commercial 282
 260
 22
 8
Industrial 292
 263
 29
 11
Governmental 18
 18
 
 
Total retail 1,074
 1,002
 72
 7
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 47
 169
 (122) (72)
Non-associated companies 18
 31
 (13) (42)
Other 36
 31
 5
 16
Total 
$1,175
 
$1,233
 
($58) (5)
         
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):        
Residential 4,326
 4,473
 (147) (3)
Commercial 3,387
 3,423
 (36) (1)
Industrial 5,781
 5,693
 88
 2
Governmental 205
 213
 (8) (4)
Total retail 13,699
 13,802
 (103) (1)
Sales for resale:        
Associated companies 1,149
 4,292
 (3,143) (73)
Non-associated companies 586
 848
 (262) (31)
Total 15,434
 18,942
 (3,508) (19)


ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Preferred StockCommon
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$38,750 $49,452 $1,050,125 $1,344,879 $2,483,206 
Net income— — — 50,403 50,403 
Preferred stock dividends— — — (518)(518)
Balance at March 31, 202238,750 49,452 1,050,125 1,394,764 2,533,091 
Net income— — — 97,485 97,485 
Preferred stock dividends— — — (518)(518)
Balance at June 30, 2022$38,750 $49,452 $1,050,125 $1,491,731 $2,630,058 
Balance at December 31, 2022$38,750 $49,452 $1,050,125 $1,541,134 $2,679,461 
Net income— — — 41,673 41,673 
Preferred stock dividends— — — (518)(518)
Balance at March 31, 202338,750 49,452 1,050,125 1,582,289 2,720,616 
Net income— — — 88,457 88,457 
Preferred stock dividends— — — (518)(518)
Balance at June 30, 2023$38,750 $49,452 $1,050,125 $1,670,228 $2,808,555 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

176


SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations

System Energy’s principal asset currently consists of an ownership interest and a leasehold interest in Grand Gulf.  The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans.  System Energy’s operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement.  Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy’s only source of operating revenues.

Third Quarter 2017 Compared to Third Quarter 2016

Net income changed insignificantly, decreasing by $1.8 million, for the third quarter 2017 compared to the third quarter 2016.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income decreased $13.1 million primarily due to provisions against revenue being recorded As discussed in 2017 in connection with the complaint against System Energy’s return on equity, lower other regulatory credits, and a higher effective income tax rate in 2017. See Federal Regulation - ComplaintComplaints Against System Energy” below for further discussion of the complaint against System Energy. System Energy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue. The decrease in regulatory credits is primarily caused by decreases in depreciation and accretion expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$245,863
 
$230,661
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities279,485
 234,759
Investing activities(259,598) (193,271)
Financing activities(120,783) (80,987)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(100,896) (39,499)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$144,967
 
$191,162

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $44.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to a decrease in spending of $36.1 million on nuclear refueling outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and the timing of collection of receivables,

166

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

partially offset by proceeds of $28.4 million received in August 2016 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed. See Note 82 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, System Energy and the Unit Power Sales Agreement are currently the subject of several litigation proceedings at the FERC, including challenges with respect to System Energy’s authorized return on equity and capital structure, renewal of its sale-leaseback arrangement, treatment of uncertain tax positions, a broader investigation of rates under the Unit Power Sales Agreement, and a prudence complaint challenging the extended power uprate completed at Grand Gulf in 2012 and the operation and management of Grand Gulf, particularly in the 2016-2020 time period. The claims in these proceedings include claims for refunds and claims for rate adjustments; the aggregate amount of refunds claimed in these proceedings substantially exceeds the net book value of System Energy. In the event of an adverse decision in one or more of these proceedings requiring the payment of substantial additional refunds, System Energy would be required to seek financing to pay such refunds which may not be available on terms acceptable to System Energy, or may not be available at all, when required.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Second Quarter 2023 Compared to Second Quarter 2022

System Energy had net income of $25.8 million in the second quarter 2023 compared to a discussionnet loss of $380.1 million in the second quarter 2022 primarily due to a regulatory charge of $551 million ($413 million net-of-tax) recorded in the second quarter 2022 to reflect the effects of the DOE litigation.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $66.3 million forpartial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to pending proceedings before the nine months ended September 30, 2017 comparedFERC. The increase was partially offset by the disallowance of the recovery of sale-leaseback lease renewal costs from Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans per the December 2022 FERC order related to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to:

money pool activity;
proceedsGrand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint and the lower authorized rate of $15.8 million received in August 2016 fromreturn on equity and capital structure limitations on monthly bills issued to Entergy Mississippi per the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously capitalized.June 2022 settlement agreement with the MPSC. See Note 82 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation;partial settlement agreement. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint.
$9.1
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

System Energy had net income of $53.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to a net loss of $348.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to a regulatory charge of $551 million ($413 million net-of-tax) recorded in funds held on deposit for interest payments due October 1, 2017.

the second quarter 2022 to reflect the effects of the partial settlement agreement and offer of settlement related to pending proceedings before the FERC. The increase was partially offset by:by the disallowance of the recovery of sale-leaseback lease renewal costs from Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans per the December 2022 FERC order related to the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint and the lower authorized rate of return on equity and capital structure limitations on monthly bills issued to Entergy Mississippi per the June 2022 settlement agreement with the MPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the partial settlement agreement. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint.


177

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 22.8% for the second quarter 2023 and 23.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2023. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2023 and the six months ended June 30, 2023 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

The effective income tax rates were 25.2% for the second quarter 2022 and 25.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the accrual for state income taxes.

Income Tax Legislation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Income Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. See the “Income Tax Legislation and Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis herein for updates to the discussion of income tax legislation and regulation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
20232022
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$2,940 $89,201 
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities60,571 82,645 
Investing activities11,262 (94,001)
Financing activities(26,518)56,880 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents45,315 45,524 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$48,255 $134,725 

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $22.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to:

aggregate refunds of $103.5 million made in January 2023 related to the sale-leaseback renewal costs and depreciation litigation as calculated in System Energy’s January 2023 compliance report filed with the FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of these refunds and the related proceedings; and
refunds of $19.3 million included in May 2023 service month bills under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to reflect the effects of the partial settlement agreement approved by the FERC in April 2023. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint.


178

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The decrease was partially offset by a decrease in spending of $33.8 million on nuclear refueling outages in 2023 as compared to the same period in 2022 and the timing of collections of receivables.

Investing Activities

System Energy’s investing activities provided $11.3 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to using $94 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to the following activity:

a decrease of $52.1 million as a result of fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements, in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
a decrease of $15.9$49.8 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily as a result of adue to higher scope of work performedspending in 2016 on2022 for Grand Gulf outage projects and lower spendingupgrades;
money pool activity; and
a decrease of $12.2 million in 2017 on compliance with NRC post-Fukushima requirements.decommissioning trust fund investment activity.


IncreasesDecreases in System Energy’s receivable from the money pool are a usesource of cash flow and System Energy’s receivable from the money pool increased by $202.7decreased $80.1 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to decreasing by $8.4$60.3 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The money pool is an inter-companyintercompany borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Net cash flow used inSystem Energy’s financing activities increased $39.8used $26.5 million of cash for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 compared to providing $56.9 million of cash for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022 primarily due to:to the following activity:


the repayment, at maturity, of $250 million of 4.10% Series mortgage bonds in April 2023;
the issuance of a decrease$50 million term loan in May 2022, which was repaid, prior to maturity, in March 2023;
net repayments of $34.8 million in 2023 compared to net long-term borrowings of $65.2$57.7 million in 2022 on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2017 as compared to facilities;
the same period in 2016; and
the payment in February 2017,repayment, at maturity, of $50$50.3 million of 2.5% Series governmental bonds in April 2022; and
the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s 4.02% Series H notes.

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease in common stock dividends and distributionsissuance of $53.4 million in 2017 compared to 2016 in order to maintain the targeted capital structure; and
the partial repayment caused by System Energy in May 2016 of $22$325 million of 5.875% pollution control revenue6.00% Series mortgage bonds due 2022 issued on behalf of System Energy.in March 2023.


See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.


167

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Capital Structure


System Energy’s capitalizationdebt to capital ratio is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio is primarily due to net income in 2023 and the net retirement of long-term debt in 2023.
 June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
Debt to capital42.9 %45.0 %
Effect of subtracting cash(1.6 %)(0.1 %)
Net debt to net capital (non-GAAP)41.3 %44.9 %
 
September 30,
2017
 December 31, 2016
Debt to capital45.0% 45.5%
Effect of subtracting cash(7.0%) (12.0%)
Net debt to net capital38.0% 33.5%


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  System Energy uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial

179

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition.  The net debt to net capital ratio is a non-GAAP measure. System Energy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition because net debt indicates System Energy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

System Energy is developing its capital investment plan for 2018 through 2020 and currently anticipates making $515 million in capital investments during that period. The estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments and initiatives such as investments in Grand Gulf.


System Energy’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2023
December 31,
2022
June 30,
2022
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
$14,880$94,981$15,411$75,745
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$236,467 $33,809 $31,511 $39,926


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.


The System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $120 million scheduled to expire in May 2019.June 2025. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $31.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $502023, $37.8 million in loans were outstanding under the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility.


Federal Regulation


See the “Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation - Federal Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.



Complaints Against System Energy

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding pending complaints against System Energy. The following are updates to that discussion.

Return on Equity and Capital Structure Complaints

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2021 the FERC ALJ issued an initial decision in the proceeding initiated by the LPSC, the MPSC, the APSC, and the City Council against System Energy regarding the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement. With regard to System Energy’s authorized return on equity, the ALJ determined that the existing return on equity of 10.94% is no longer just and reasonable, and that the replacement authorized return on equity, based on application of the Opinion No. 569-A methodology, should be 9.32%. The ALJ further determined that System Energy should pay refunds for a fifteen-month refund period (January 2017-April 2018) based on the difference between the current return on equity and the replacement authorized return on equity. The ALJ determined that the April 2018 complaint concerning the authorized return on equity should be dismissed, and that no refunds for a second fifteen-month refund period should be due. With regard to System Energy’s capital structure, the ALJ determined that System Energy’s actual equity ratio is excessive and that the just and reasonable equity ratio is 48.15% equity, based on the average equity ratio of the proxy group used to evaluate the return on equity for the second complaint. The ALJ further determined that System Energy should pay refunds for a fifteen-month refund period (September 2018-December 2019) based on
168

180

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Complaint Against System Energy

In January 2017 the APSCdifference between the actual equity ratio and MPSC filedthe 48.15% equity ratio. If the ALJ’s initial decision is upheld, the estimated refund for this proceeding is approximately $39 million, which includes interest through June 30, 2023, and the estimated resulting annual rate reduction would be approximately $28 million. As a complaintresult of the 2022 settlement agreement with the MPSC, both the estimated refund and rate reduction exclude Entergy Mississippi's portion. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement. The estimated refund will continue to accrue interest until a final FERC againstdecision is issued.

The ALJ initial decision is an interim step in the FERC litigation process, and an ALJ’s determinations made in an initial decision are not controlling on the FERC. In April 2021, System Energy. The complaint seeks a reductionEnergy filed its brief on exceptions, in which it challenged the initial decision’s findings on both the return on equity componentand capital structure issues. Also in April 2021 the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, the City Council, and the FERC trial staff filed briefs on exceptions. Reply briefs opposing exceptions were filed in May 2021 by System Energy, the FERC trial staff, the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council. Refunds, if any, that might be required will only become due after the FERC issues its order reviewing the initial decision.

Grand Gulf Sale-leaseback Renewal Complaint and Uncertain Tax Position Rate Base Issue

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2018 the LPSC filed a complaint against System Energy and Entergy Services related to System Energy’s renewal of a sale-leaseback transaction originally entered into in December 1988 for an 11.5% undivided interest in Grand Gulf Unit 1. The APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council subsequently intervened in the proceeding. A hearing was held before a FERC ALJ in November 2019. In April 2020 the ALJ issued the initial decision, and in December 2022 the FERC issued an order on the ALJ’s initial decision, which affirmed it in part and modified it in part. The FERC’s order directed System Energy to calculate refunds on three issues, and to provide a compliance report detailing the calculations. The FERC’s order also disallows the future recovery of sale-leaseback renewal costs, which is estimated at approximately $11.5 million annually for purchases from Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans through July 2036. The three refund issues are rental expenses related to the renewal of the sale-leaseback arrangements; refunds, if any, for the revenue requirement impact of including accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the decommissioning uncertain tax positions from 2004 through the present; and refunds for the net effect of correcting the depreciation inputs for capital additions attributable to the portion of plant subject to the sale-leaseback.

In January 2023, System Energy filed its compliance report with the FERC. With respect to the sale-leaseback renewal costs, System Energy calculated a refund of $89.8 million, which represented all of the sale-leaseback renewal rental costs that System Energy recovered in rates, with interest. With respect to the decommissioning uncertain tax position issue, System Energy calculated that no additional refunds are owed because it had already provided a one-time historical credit (for the period January 2016 through September 2020) of $25.2 million based on the accumulated deferred income taxes that resulted from the IRS’s partial acceptance of the decommissioning tax position, and because it has been providing an ongoing rate base credit for the accumulated deferred income taxes that resulted from the IRS’s partial acceptance of the decommissioning tax position since October 2020. With respect to the depreciation refund, System Energy calculated a refund of $13.7 million, which is the net total of a refund to customers for excess depreciation expense previously collected, plus interest, offset by the additional return on rate base that System Energy previously did not collect, without interest. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the regulatory charge and corresponding regulatory liability recorded in June 2022 related to these proceedings. In January 2023, System Energy paid the refunds of $103.5 million, which included refunds of $41.7 million to Entergy Arkansas, $27.8 million to Entergy Louisiana, and $34 million to Entergy New Orleans.

In January 2023, System Energy filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s determinations in the December 2022 order on sale-leaseback refund issues and future lease cost disallowances, the FERC’s prospective policy on uncertain tax positions, and the proper accounting of System Energy’s accumulated deferred income taxes adjustment for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017; and a motion for confirmation of its interpretation of the December 2022 order’s remedy concerning the decommissioning tax position. In January 2023 the retail regulators

181

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
filed a motion for confirmation of their interpretation of the refund requirement in the December 2022 FERC order and a provisional request for rehearing. In February 2023 the FERC issued a notice that the rehearing requests have been deemed denied by operation of law. The deemed denial of the rehearing request initiates the sixty-day period in which aggrieved parties may petition for federal appellate court review of the underlying FERC orders; however, the FERC may issue a substantive order on rehearing as long as it continues to have jurisdiction over the case. In March 2023, System Energy filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit a petition for review of the December 2022 order. In March 2023, System Energy also filed an unopposed motion to stay the proceeding in the Fifth Circuit pending the FERC’s disposition of the pending motions, and the court granted the motion to stay.

In February 2023, System Energy submitted a tariff compliance filing with the FERC to clarify that, consistent with the releases provided in the MPSC settlement, Entergy Mississippi will continue to be charged for its allocation of the sale-leaseback renewal costs under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. See “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement. In March 2023 the MPSC filed a protest to System Energy’s tariff compliance filing. The MPSC argues that the settlement did not specifically address post-settlement sale-leaseback renewal costs and that the sale-leaseback renewal costs may not be recovered under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. Entergy Mississippi’s allocated sale-leaseback renewal costs are estimated at $5.7 million annually for the remaining term of the sale-leaseback renewal.

LPSC Additional Complaints

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2020 the LPSC authorized its staff to file additional complaints at the FERC related to the rates charged by System Energy for Grand Gulf energy and capacity supplied to Entergy Louisiana under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The following are updates to that discussion.

Unit Power Sales Agreement Complaint

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the first of the additional complaints was filed by the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council in September 2020. The first complaint raises two sets of rate allegations: violations of the filed rate and a corresponding request for refunds for prior periods; and elements of the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuantare unjust and unreasonable and a corresponding request for refunds for the 15-month refund period and changes to whichthe Unit Power Sales Agreement prospectively. In May 2021 the FERC issued an order addressing the complaint, establishing a refund effective date of September 21, 2020, establishing hearing procedures, and holding those procedures in abeyance pending the FERC’s review of the initial decision in the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback renewal complaint discussed above.

In November 2021 the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council filed direct testimony and requested the FERC to order refunds for prior periods and prospective amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement. System Energy sellsfiled answering testimony in January 2022. In March 2022 the FERC trial staff filed direct and answering testimony recommending refunds and prospective modifications to the Unit Power Sales Agreement.

In April 2022, System Energy filed cross-answering testimony in response to the FERC trial staff’s recommendations. In June 2022 the FERC trial staff submitted revised answering testimony, in which it recommended additional refunds associated with the accumulated deferred income tax balances in account 190. Also in June 2022, System Energy filed revised and supplemental cross-answering testimony to respond to the FERC trial staff’s testimony and to oppose its Grand Gulf capacityrevised recommendation.

In May 2022 the LPSC, the APSC, and energythe City Council filed rebuttal testimony and asserted new claims. In June 2022 a new procedural schedule was adopted, providing for additional rounds of testimony and for the hearing to begin in September 2022. The hearing concluded in December 2022. Also in December 2022, a motion to extend the briefing schedule and the May 2023 deadline for the initial decision was granted.


182

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
In November 2022, System Energy filed a partial settlement agreement with the APSC, the City Council, and the LPSC that resolves the following issues raised in the Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint: advance collection of lease payments, aircraft costs, executive incentive compensation, money pool borrowings, advertising expenses, deferred nuclear refueling outage costs, industry association dues, and termination of the capital funds agreement. The settlement provides that System Energy will provide a black-box refund of $18 million (inclusive of interest), plus additional refund amounts with interest to be calculated for certain issues to be distributed to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equityas the Utility operating companies other than Entergy Mississippi purchasing under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The settlement further provides that if the APSC, the City Council, or the LPSC agrees to the global settlement System Energy entered into with the MPSC (see “System Energy Settlement with the MPSC” in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement), and such global settlement includes a black-box refund amount, then the black-box refund for this settlement agreement shall not be incremental or in addition to the global black-box refund amount. The settlement agreement addresses other matters as well, including adjustments to rate base beginning in October 2022, exclusion of certain other costs, and inclusion of money pool borrowings, if any, in short-term debt within the cost of capital calculation used in the Unit Power Sales Agreement. In April 2023 the FERC approved the settlement agreement. The refund provided for in the settlement agreement was included in the May 2023 service month bills under the Unit Power Sales Agreement.

In May 2023 the presiding ALJ issued an initial decision finding that System Energy should have excluded multiple identified categories of accumulated deferred income taxes from rate base when calculating Unit Power Sales Agreement is 10.94%.bills. Based on this finding, the initial decision recommended refunds; System Energy estimates that those refunds for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans would total approximately $115 million plus $142 million of interest through June 30, 2023. The complaint allegesinitial decision also finds that the return on equityUnit Power Sales Agreement should be modified such that a cash working capital allowance of negative $36.4 million is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requestsapplied prospectively. If the FERC ultimately orders these modifications to institute proceedingscash working capital be implemented, the estimated annual revenue requirement impact is expected to investigatebe immaterial. On the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests thatother non-settled issues for which the complainants sought refunds or changes to the Unit Power Sales Agreement, the initial decision ruled against the complainants.

The initial decision is an interim step in the FERC establish January 23, 2017, as a refund effective date. The complaint includes returnlitigation process, and an ALJ’s determination made in an initial decision is not controlling on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity forFERC. System Energy is between 8.37%disagrees with the ALJ’s findings concerning the accumulated deferred income taxes issues and 8.67%.cash working capital. In July 2023, System Energy answeredfiled a brief on exceptions to the complaintinitial decision’s accumulated deferred income taxes findings. Refunds, if any, that might be required will become due only after the FERC issues its order reviewing the initial decision.

Grand Gulf Prudence Complaint

As discussed in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equitythe Form 10-K, in March 2021, the second of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. Thethe additional complaints was filed at the FERC by the LPSC, the APSC, and the City Council intervenedagainst System Energy, Entergy Services, Entergy Operations, and Entergy Corporation. In November 2022 the FERC issued an order setting the complaint for settlement and hearing procedures. In February 2023 the FERC issued an order denying rehearing and thereby affirming its order setting the complaint for settlement and hearing procedures. In July 2023 the FERC chief ALJ terminated settlement procedures and appointed a presiding ALJ to oversee hearing procedures. The procedural schedule for the hearing has not yet been established.

Based on analysis of the pending litigation, including the May 2023 initial decision in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. In September 2017 the FERC established a refund effective date of January 23, 2017, consolidated the return on equity complaint proceeding with the proceeding related to System Energy’s Unit Power Sales Agreement amendments,complaint proceeding, management determined that System Energy’s regulatory liability related to complaints against System Energy as of June 30, 2023 is adequate.

System Energy Formula Rate Annual Protocols Formal Challenge Concerning 2021 Calendar Year Bills

In March 2023, pursuant to the protocols procedures discussed below,in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, the LPSC, the APSC, and directed the partiesCity Council filed with the FERC a formal challenge to engageSystem Energy’s

183

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
implementation of the formula rate during calendar year 2021. The formal challenge alleges: (1) that it was imprudent for System Energy to accept the IRS’s partial acceptance of a previously uncertain tax position; (2) that System Energy used incorrect inputs for retained earnings that are used to determine the capital structure; (3) that the equity ratio charged in settlement proceedings beforerates was excessive; and (4) that all issues in the ongoing Unit Power Sales Agreement complaint proceeding should also be reflected in calendar year 2021 bills. The first, third, and fourth allegations are identical to issues that were raised in the formal challenge to the calendar year 2020 bills. The formal challenge to the calendar year 2021 bills states that the impact of the first allegation is “tens of millions of dollars,” but it does not provide an ALJ. Ifestimate of the parties failfinancial impact of the remaining allegations.

In May 2023, System Energy filed an answer to come to an agreement during settlement proceedings,the formal challenge in which it requested that the FERC deny the formal challenge as a prehearing conference will be held to establish a procedural schedule for hearing proceedings.matter of law, or else hold the proceeding in abeyance pending the resolution of related dockets.


Unit Power Sales Agreement


In August 2017,As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in December 2021, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. The filing proposes limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula.expenses. The proposed amendments would result in lowerhigher charges to the Utility operating companies that buy capacity and energy from System Energy under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The proposed changes are based on updated depreciation and nuclear decommissioning studies that take into account the renewal of Grand Gulf’s operating license for a term through November 1, 2044. System Energy requested that the FERC accept the amendments effective October 1, 2017.

In September 2017February 2022 the FERC accepted System Energy’sEntergy’s proposed Unit Power Sales Agreement amendments, subject to further proceedings to consider the justness and reasonablenessincreased depreciation rates with an effective date of the amendments. Because the amendments propose a rate decrease, the FERC also initiated an investigation under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to determine if the rate decrease should be lower than proposed. The FERC accepted the proposed amendments effective OctoberMarch 1, 2017,2022, subject to refund pending the outcome of the further settlement and/or hearing proceedings, and established a refund effective dateprocedures. In June 2023 System Energy filed with the FERC an unopposed offer of October 11, 2017settlement that it had negotiated with respectintervenors to the rate decrease. The FERC also consolidated the Unit Power Sales Agreement amendment proceeding with the proceeding related to the complaint filedproceeding. If it is approved by the APSC and MPSC, discussed above, and directedFERC, the parties to engage in settlement proceedings before an ALJ. Ifwill fully resolve the parties fail to come to an agreement during settlement proceedings, a prehearing conference will be held to establish a procedural schedule for hearing proceedings.proceeding.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.


169

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, impairment of long-lived assets, and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.


a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

184
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
     
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES        
Electric 
$156,106
 
$114,039
 
$475,849
 
$403,056
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Operation and Maintenance:        
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 16,170
 (7,393) 53,164
 26,429
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 4,435
 4,958
 13,595
 14,448
Other operation and maintenance 51,392
 32,867
 154,103
 100,793
Decommissioning 8,290
 12,802
 34,974
 37,782
Taxes other than income taxes 6,679
 6,256
 19,767
 18,894
Depreciation and amortization 34,524
 30,811
 105,152
 100,902
Other regulatory credits - net (2,843) (10,148) (24,626) (32,564)
TOTAL 118,647
 70,153
 356,129
 266,684
         
OPERATING INCOME 37,459
 43,886
 119,720
 136,372
         
OTHER INCOME        
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 1,736
 1,758
 4,148
 6,089
Interest and investment income 6,624
 4,233
 15,021
 12,631
Miscellaneous - net (130) (109) (361) (365)
TOTAL 8,230
 5,882
 18,808
 18,355
         
INTEREST EXPENSE        
Interest expense 9,169
 9,186
 27,469
 28,119
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (425) (440) (1,014) (1,536)
TOTAL 8,744
 8,746
 26,455
 26,583
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 36,945
 41,022
 112,073
 128,144
         
Income taxes 16,362
 18,652
 51,793
 54,726
         
NET INCOME 
$20,583
 
$22,370
 
$60,280
 
$73,418
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
2023202220232022
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric$138,384 $163,872 $309,956 $305,248 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale18,783 11,610 37,630 19,533 
Nuclear refueling outage expenses6,692 5,320 13,311 11,247 
Other operation and maintenance46,986 54,685 97,186 98,589 
Decommissioning10,391 10,016 20,678 19,933 
Taxes other than income taxes7,728 7,150 15,010 15,001 
Depreciation and amortization35,303 37,777 72,440 67,700 
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net(32,415)527,515 (38,874)518,991 
TOTAL93,468 654,073 217,381 750,994 
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)44,916 (490,201)92,575 (445,746)
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction1,605 2,581 3,423 4,628 
Interest and investment income (loss)1,638 (8,959)7,402 (3,727)
Miscellaneous - net(1,613)(2,741)(10,691)(4,380)
TOTAL1,630 (9,119)134 (3,479)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense13,635 9,112 24,126 18,593 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(436)(409)(791)(736)
TOTAL13,199 8,703 23,335 17,857 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES33,347 (508,023)69,374 (467,082)
Income taxes7,588 (127,875)16,070 (118,366)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$25,759 ($380,148)$53,304 ($348,716)
See Notes to Financial Statements.


185

























(pagePage left blank intentionally)



186
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$60,280
 
$73,418
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 184,625
 176,571
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 44,017
 73,829
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables 21,147
 9,084
Accounts payable 2,344
 (2,217)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 2,956
 (30,063)
Interest accrued 401
 406
Other working capital accounts 7,605
 (22,051)
Other regulatory assets 1,196
 (12,392)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (14,665) (15,789)
Other assets and liabilities (30,421) (16,037)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 279,485
 234,759
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (60,041) (71,471)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 4,148
 6,089
Nuclear fuel purchases (24,239) (137,248)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel 60,188
 11,467
Changes in other investments - net (9,061) 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 308,134
 392,926
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (336,069) (419,255)
Changes in money pool receivable - net (202,658) 8,415
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs
 
 15,806
Net cash flow used in investing activities (259,598) (193,271)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Retirement of long-term debt (50,003) (22,002)
Changes in credit borrowings - net 14,858
 80,041
Common stock dividends and distributions (85,610) (139,000)
Other (28) (26)
Net cash flow used in financing activities (120,783) (80,987)
     
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (100,896) (39,499)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 245,863
 230,661
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$144,967
 
$191,162
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$26,251
 
$27,087
Income taxes 
$—
 
$3,402
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    



SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)$53,304 ($348,716)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization125,741 104,296 
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued17,865 (124,202)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables13,558 (14,753)
Accounts payable(26,332)(27,368)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued(10,704)(2,664)
Interest accrued3,035 (247)
Other working capital accounts5,569 (41,234)
Other regulatory assets(16,683)(22,768)
Other regulatory liabilities27,611 338,280 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities(4,758)(7,494)
Other assets and liabilities(127,635)229,515 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities60,571 82,645 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures(54,140)(100,953)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction3,423 4,628 
Nuclear fuel purchases(31,822)(77,704)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel25,091 18,845 
Increase in other investments(4)— 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales151,463 177,584 
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds(162,850)(176,735)
Changes in money pool receivable - net80,101 60,334 
Net cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities11,262 (94,001)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt585,898 556,696 
Retirement of long-term debt(612,416)(499,816)
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities(26,518)56,880 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents45,315 45,524 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period2,940 89,201 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$48,255 $134,725 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized$20,289 $19,454 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

187
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
  2017 2016
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$47
 
$786
Temporary cash investments 144,920
 245,077
Total cash and cash equivalents 144,967
 245,863
Accounts receivable:    
Associated companies 284,724
 104,390
Other 4,814
 3,637
Total accounts receivable 289,538
 108,027
Materials and supplies - at average cost 86,719
 82,469
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 11,713
 24,729
Prepaid taxes 12,926
 15,882
Prepayments and other 14,450
 4,229
TOTAL 560,313
 481,199
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Decommissioning trust funds 870,610
 780,496
TOTAL 870,610
 780,496
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 4,308,864
 4,331,668
Property under capital lease 585,084
 585,084
Construction work in progress 80,343
 43,888
Nuclear fuel 188,956
 259,635
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 5,163,247
 5,220,275
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,155,691
 3,063,249
UTILITY PLANT - NET 2,007,556
 2,157,026
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net 86,515
 93,127
Other regulatory assets 416,628
 411,212
Other 4,421
 4,652
TOTAL 507,564
 508,991
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$3,946,043
 
$3,927,712
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)
20232022
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$2,015 $78 
Temporary cash investments46,240 2,862 
Total cash and cash equivalents48,255 2,940 
Accounts receivable:
Associated companies65,892 158,601 
Other5,195 6,145 
Total accounts receivable71,087 164,746 
Materials and supplies - at average cost147,318 135,346 
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs19,681 33,377 
Prepaid taxes3,107 — 
Prepayments and other12,426 9,097 
TOTAL301,874 345,506 
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds1,260,251 1,142,914 
TOTAL1,260,251 1,142,914 
UTILITY PLANT
Electric5,461,317 5,425,449 
Construction work in progress99,337 102,987 
Nuclear fuel146,230 193,004 
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT5,706,884 5,721,440 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization3,439,474 3,412,257 
UTILITY PLANT - NET2,267,410 2,309,183 
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Other regulatory assets431,804 415,121 
Other898 1,422 
TOTAL432,702 416,543 
TOTAL ASSETS$4,262,237 $4,214,146 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

188

SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETSBALANCE SHEETSBALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)(Unaudited)
 2017 201620232022
 (In Thousands)(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$4
 
$50,003
Currently maturing long-term debt$46 $300,037 
Short-term borrowings 31,751
 66,893
Accounts payable:    Accounts payable:
Associated companies 10,325
 5,843
Associated companies11,431 21,701 
Other 44,958
 50,558
Other30,897 58,178 
Taxes accruedTaxes accrued— 7,597 
Interest accrued 14,450
 14,049
Interest accrued14,626 11,591 
Sale-leaseback/depreciation regulatory liabilitySale-leaseback/depreciation regulatory liability— 103,497 
Other 2,958
 2,957
Other4,065 4,071 
TOTAL 104,446
 190,303
TOTAL61,065 506,672 
    
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 1,147,913
 1,112,865
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued395,069 376,070 
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 39,726
 41,663
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits44,004 44,692 
Regulatory liability for income taxes - netRegulatory liability for income taxes - net109,366 110,840 
Other regulatory liabilities 424,381
 370,862
Other regulatory liabilities797,606 665,024 
Decommissioning 853,291
 854,202
Decommissioning1,063,139 1,042,461 
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 103,185
 117,850
Pension and other postretirement liabilities35,992 40,750 
Long-term debt 551,387
 501,129
Long-term debt752,923 477,868 
Other 8,221
 15
Other
TOTAL 3,128,104
 2,998,586
TOTAL3,198,101 2,757,707 
    
Commitments and Contingencies    Commitments and Contingencies
    
COMMON EQUITY    COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2017 and 2016 679,350
 679,350
Retained earnings 34,143
 59,473
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2023 and 2022Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2023 and 20221,086,850 1,086,850 
Accumulated deficitAccumulated deficit(83,779)(137,083)
TOTAL 713,493
 738,823
TOTAL1,003,071 949,767 
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$3,946,043
 
$3,927,712
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,262,237 $4,214,146 
    
See Notes to Financial Statements.    See Notes to Financial Statements.

189
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 
Common
Stock
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
 (In Thousands)
      
Balance at December 31, 2015
$719,350
 
$61,729
 
$781,079
      
Net income
 73,418
 73,418
Common stock dividends and distributions(40,000) (99,000) (139,000)
      
Balance at September 30, 2016
$679,350
 
$36,147
 
$715,497
      
      
Balance at December 31, 2016
$679,350
 
$59,473
 
$738,823
      
Net income
 60,280
 60,280
Common stock dividends
 (85,610) (85,610)
      
Balance at September 30, 2017
$679,350
 
$34,143
 
$713,493
      
See Notes to Financial Statements.     


SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Retained
Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$951,850 $139,510 $1,091,360 
Net income— 31,432 31,432 
Balance at March 31, 2022951,850 170,942 1,122,792 
Net loss— (380,148)(380,148)
Balance at June 30, 2022$951,850 ($209,206)$742,644 
Balance at December 31, 2022$1,086,850 ($137,083)$949,767 
Net income— 27,545 27,545 
Balance at March 31, 20231,086,850 (109,538)977,312 
Net income— 25,759 25,759 
Balance at June 30, 2023$1,086,850 ($83,779)$1,003,071 
See Notes to Financial Statements.




190

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.  Legal Proceedings


See “PART I, Item 1,Litigation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory proceedings affecting Entergy.  Also see NoteNotes 1 and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and “Item 5, Other Information,Environmental Regulation” below for updates regarding environmental proceedings and regulation.


Item 1A.  Risk Factors


There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in PART"Part I, Item 1A,Risk Factors”1A. RISK FACTORS" in the Form 10-K.


Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Period
Total Number of

Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid

per Share
Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of a

Publicly

Announced Plan
Maximum $
Dollar
Amount

of Shares that May

Yet be Purchased

Under a Plan (b)
7/4/01/2017-7/31/20172023-4/30/2023

$— 
$—
— 
$350,052,918 
$350,052,918
8/5/01/2017-8/2023-5/31/20172023

$— 
$—
— 
$350,052,918 
$350,052,918
9/6/01/2017-9/2023-6/30/20172023

$— 
$—
— 
$350,052,918 
$350,052,918
Total

$— 
$—
— 


In accordance with Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy’s common stock.  According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market.  Entergy’s management has been authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans.  In addition to this authority, the Board has authorized share repurchase programs to enable opportunistic purchases in response to market conditions. In October 2010 the Board granted authority for a $500 million share repurchase program. The amount of share repurchases under these programs may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending or new investment opportunities.  In addition, in the first quarter 2017,2023, Entergy withheld 1,05471,722 shares of its common stock at $70.58$108.71 per share, 122,14827,533 shares of its common stock at $70.61$107.69 per share, and 31,24312,265 shares of its common stock at $71.89$107.59 per share, 551 shares of its common stock at $103.72 per share, 232 shares of its common stock at $106.07 per share, and 100 shares of its common stock at $105.79 per share to pay income taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock granted and payout of performance units as part of its long-term incentive program.

(a)See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.
(b)Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $500 million plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.



(a)See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.
(b)Maximum dollar amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $500 million share repurchase program plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.


191

Item 5.  Other Information


Rule 10b5-1 Trading Agreements

During the three months ended June 30, 2023, no director or officer of Entergy or any of the Registrant Subsidiaries adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry


Following are updatesis an update to the Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.


Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982


Nuclear Plant Decommissioning

See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding decommissioning funding for the nuclear plants.  Following are updates to that discussion.  


In March 20172023 filings with the NRC were made for certain Entergy subsidiaries’ nuclear plants reporting on decommissioning funding.funding for all of Entergy’s subsidiaries’ nuclear plants. Those reports showed that decommissioning funding for each of thosethe nuclear plants met the NRC’s financial assurance requirements.


NRC Reactor Oversight Process

In March 2017,September 2022 the NRC placed Waterford 3 in Column 2 based on an error associated with a radiation monitor calibration. Entergy soldcorrected the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon, and as part of the transaction, the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund, alongissue with the decommissioning obligationradiation monitor in February 2022 and also corrected a subsequent radiation monitor calibration issue. In May 2023 the NRC completed a supplemental inspection of Waterford 3 in accordance with its inspection procedures for that plant,nuclear plants in Column 2 and Waterford 3 was transferredreturned to Exelon. The FitzPatrick spent fuel disposal contract was assignedColumn 1.

In July 2023 the NRC placed River Bend in Column 2, effective April 2023, based on failure to Exelon as partinspect wiring associated with the high pressure core spray system. River Bend will remain in Column 2 pending successful completion of the transaction.a supplemental inspection.


Environmental Regulation


Following are updates to the Environmental Regulation section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.


National Ambient Air Quality Standards

See the Form 10-K for discussion of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set by the EPA in accordance with the Clean Air ActAct. Following are updates to that discussion.

Hazardous Air Pollutants

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the EPA released the final Mercury and Subsequent Amendments

Regional Haze

Air Toxics Standard (MATS) rule in December 2011, which had a compliance date, with a widely granted one-year extension, of April 2016. The required controls have been installed and are operational at all affected Entergy units. In June 2005April 2023 the EPA issued a regulatory proposal to revise portions of the MATS rule, including a proposed reduction to the emission limit for filterable particulate matter. If finalized, the proposed lower filterable particulate matter emission limitation could require additional capital investment and/or additional other operation and maintenance expenditures at Entergy’s coal-fired generating units. Entergy is closely monitoring this rulemaking, in part through its various trade associations.


192

Good Neighbor Plan/Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

In March 2023 the EPA released its final Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) regulations that potentially could result in a requirement to install SO2 and NOx pollution control technology as Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BART) to continue operating certain of Entergy’s fossil generation units.  The rule leaves certain CAVR determinations to the states.

In Arkansas, the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prepared a state implementation plan (SIP) for Arkansas facilities to implement its obligations under the CAVR.   In April 2012 the EPA finalized a decision addressing the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, in which it disapproved a large portion of the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, including the emission limits for NOx and SO2 at White Bluff.    By Court order, the EPA had to issue a final federal implementation planFederal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Arkansas Regional Haze by no later than August 31, 2016. In April 2015 the EPA published a proposed FIP for Arkansas, taking comment on requiring installation of scrubbers and low NOx burners to continue operating both units at the White Bluff plant and both units at the Independence plant and NOx controls to continue operating the Lake Catherine plant. Entergy filed comments by the deadline in August 2015. Among other comments, including opposition to the EPA’s proposed controls on the Independence units, Entergy proposed to meet more stringent SO2 and NOx limits at both White Bluff and Independence within three years of the effective date of the final FIP and to cease the use of coal at the White Bluff units at a later date.

In September 2016 the EPA published the final Arkansas Regional Haze FIP. In most respects, the EPA finalized its original proposal but shortened the time for compliance for installation of the NOx controls. The FIP requires an emission limitation consistent with SO2 scrubbers at both White Bluff and Independence by October 2021 and NOx controls by April 2018. The EPA declined to adopt Entergy’s proposals related to ceasing coal use as an alternative to SO2 scrubbers for White Bluff SO2 BART. For some or all of the FIP, Entergy anticipates that Arkansas will submit a SIP to replace the FIP. In November 2016, Entergy and other interested parties, such, known as the State of Arkansas, filed

petitions for administrative reconsideration and stay at the EPA as well as petitions for judicial reviewGood Neighbor Plan, to the U.S. Court of Appealsaddress interstate transport for the Eighth Circuit. In February 2017, Entergy,2015 ozone NAAQS which will increase the State of Arkansas, and other parties requested the Court to judicially stay the FIP.  In March 2017 the EPA granted in part the petitions for reconsideration and stated its intent to stay the FIP compliance deadlines by at least 90 days. Subsequently, the EPA granted a 90 day stay of the FIP effective dates and the EPA now has proposed approval of (i) an extension of these NOx limit deadlines to January 2020 and (ii) a state implementation for NOx controls that allows compliance with the provisionsstringency of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule to satisfy(CSAPR) program in all four of the NOstates where the Utility operating companies operate. The FIP will significantly reduce ozone season nitrogen oxides (NOx regional haze provisions) emission allowance budgets and allocations for White Bluff, Independence,electric generating units. Entergy is currently assessing its compliance options for the FIP. This may include the installation of post-combustion NOx emissions controls on certain coal or large legacy gas units that will operate beyond 2026 and Lake Catherine. Arkansas published aare not currently equipped with such controls. Since the release of the proposed replacement state planrule in October 2017. This plan is under review, and comments are due toApril 2022, the stateprice for Group 3 ozone season NOx emission allowances has fluctuated significantly, peaking at over $45,000 per allowance in January 2018. The Eighth Circuit granted the government’s motion to hold the appeal litigation in abeyancelate August 2022, and has directedrecently ranged between $8,000 to $10,000 per allowance. Prior to issuance of the parties to file status reports in December 2017.

In Louisiana, Entergy is working with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and the EPA to revise the Louisiana SIP for regional haze, which was disapproved in part in 2012. The LDEQ submitted a revised SIPFIP, in February 2017. In May 2017 the EPA proposed to approve a majority of the revisions. In September 20172023 the EPA issued a proposed SIP approvalrelated State Implementation Plan (SIP) disapprovals for the Nelson plant, requiring an emission limitation consistent with the use of low-sulfur coal, with a compliance date three years from the effective date of the final EPA approval. The EPA’s final approval decision is expected in the fourth quarter 2017. Entergy continues to monitor the submission and to file comments in the process as appropriate.

New and Existing Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

As a part of a climate plan announced in June 2013, the EPA was directed to (i) reissue proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants by September 20, 2013, with finalization of the rules to occur in a timely manner; (ii) issue proposed carbon pollution standards, regulations, or guidelines, as appropriate, for modified, reconstructed, and existing power plants no later than June 1, 2014; (iii) finalize those rules by no later than June 1, 2015; and (iv) include in the guidelines addressing existing power plants a requirement thatmany states, submit to the EPA the implementation plans required under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations by no later than June 30, 2016. In January 2014 the EPA issued the proposed New Source Performance Standards rule for new sources. In June 2014 the EPA issued proposed standards for existing power plants.  Entergy has been actively engaged in the rulemaking process, having submitted comments to the EPA in December 2014. The EPA issued the final rules for both new and existing sources in August 2015, and they were published in the Federal Register in October 2015. The existing source rule, also called the Clean Power Plan, requires states to develop plans for compliance with the EPA’s emission standards. In February 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay halting the effectiveness of the rule until the rule is reviewed by the D.C. Circuit and by the U.S. Supreme Court, if further review is granted. In March 2017 the current administration issued an executive order entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth” instructing the EPA to review and then to suspend, revise, or rescind the Clean Power Plan, if appropriate. The EPA subsequently asked the D.C. Circuit to hold the challenges to the Clean Power Plan and the greenhouse gas new source performance standards in abeyance and signed a notice of withdrawal of the proposed federal plan, model trading rules, and the Clean Energy Incentive Program. The court placed the litigation in abeyance in April 2017. The EPA Administrator also sent a letter to the affected governors explaining that states are not currently required to meet Clean Power Plan deadlines, some of which have passed. In October 2017 the EPA announced a proposed rule that would repeal the Clean Power Plan on the grounds that it exceeds the EPA’s statutory authority under the Clean Air Act. The EPA also asked the D.C. Circuit to continue to hold the litigation over the Clean Power Plan in abeyance “pending the conclusion of rulemaking” and stated to the court that the agency intends to issue “in the near future” an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comments on replacing the Clean Power Plan. Also in October 2017, the EPA submitted its draft advance notice of proposed rulemaking to the Office of Management and Budget for review, which typically takes 60-90 days.

Clean Water Act

The 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (known as the Clean Water Act) provide the statutory basis for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program and the basic structure for regulating the discharge of pollutants from point sources to waters of the United States.  The Clean Water Act requires virtually all discharges of pollutants to waters of the United States to be permitted.�� Section 316(b) of the

Clean Water Act regulates cooling water intake structures, section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires a water quality certification from the state in support of certain federal actions and approvals, and section 404 regulates the dredge and fill of waters of the United States, including jurisdictional wetlands.

NPDES Permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications

NPDES permits are subject to renewal every five years. Consequently, Entergy is currently in various stages of the data evaluation and discharge permitting process for its power plants.

For thirteen years, Entergy participated in an administrative permitting process with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for renewal of the Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 discharge permit. That proceeding recently was settled, along with other ongoing proceedings. In May 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging New York State’s actions in signing and implementing the Indian Point settlement with Entergy on the basis that the State failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions. All signatories to the settlement agreement, including the Entergy affiliates that hold NRC licenses for Indian Point, were named. For a discussionfour states in which the Utility operating companies operate, and these SIP disapprovals are the subject of the recent Indian Point settlement, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorization to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants” in Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis.

316(b) Cooling Water Intake Structures

The EPA finalized regulations in July 2004 governing the intake of water at large existing power plants employing cooling water intake structures. The rule sought to reduce perceived impacts on aquatic resources by requiring covered facilities to implement technology or other measures to meet EPA-targeted reductions in water use and corresponding perceived aquatic impacts. Entergy, other industry members and industry groups, environmental groups, and a coalition of northeastern and mid-Atlantic states challenged various aspects of the rule. After litigation, in May 2014, the EPA issued a new final 316(b) rule, followed by publication in the Federal Register in August 2014, with the final rule effective in October 2014. Entergy is developing a compliance plan for each affected facility in accordance with the requirements of the final rule.
Entergy filedmany legal challenges, including a petition for review filed by Entergy Louisiana challenging the disapproval of Louisiana’s SIP. Stays of the final rule as a co-petitioner withSIP disapprovals have been granted in all four states in which the Utility Water Act Group.operating companies operate, and the Good Neighbor Plan will not go into effect while the stays are in place. Decisions on the merits regarding the SIP disapprovals are not expected until 2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in September 2017. No decisionfinal FIP also is expected before the first quarter 2018.subject to numerous legal challenges.


Federal Jurisdiction of Waters of the United StatesGreenhouse Gas Emissions


In September 2013May 2023 the EPA proposed several rules regulating greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing (coal and gas-fired) power plants. If finalized, the U.S. Army Corpsproposed requirements for existing “large and frequently used” gas turbine generating units could require significant investments in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction technologies at certain of Engineers announced the intention to proposeEntergy’s existing gas turbine units with a rule to clarify federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction over waterscapacity of the United States. The announcement was madegreater than 300 MW per combustion turbine and which operate at an annual capacity factor of greater than 50 percent. Comments are due in conjunction with the EPA’s release of a draft scientific report on the “connectivity” of waters that the agency said would inform the rulemaking. This report was finalized in January 2015. The final rule was published in the Federal Register in June 2015. The rule could significantly increase the number and types of waters included in the EPA’s and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdiction, which in turn could pose additional permitting and pollutant management burdens on Entergy’s operations. The final rule has been challenged in federal court by several parties, including most states. In August 2015 the District Court for North Dakota issued a preliminary injunction staying the new rule in 13 states. In October 2015 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a nationwide stay of the rule.2023. Entergy will continue to monitoris closely monitoring this rulemaking, and ensure compliance with existing permitting processes. In response to the stay, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers resumed nationwide use of the agencies’ regulations as they existed prior to August 27, 2015. In February 2017 the current administration issued an executive order instructing the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review the Waters of the United States rule and to revise or rescind, as appropriate. In June 2017 the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule that rescinds the June 2015 rule and recodifies the definition of “waters of the U.S.” that was in effect prior to the 2015 rule. The administration is expected to propose a definition of “waters of the U.S.” at a later date.part through its various trade associations.



Coal Combustion Residuals


SeeAs discussed in the Form 10-K, for discussion ofin April 2015 the EPA published the final coal combustion residuals rule (CCR rule) and the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act).(CCR) rule. In September 2017May 2023 the EPA agreedreleased a proposed rule establishing management standards for legacy CCR surface impoundments (i.e., inactive surface impoundments at inactive power plants) and establishing a new class of units referred to reconsider certain provisionsas CCR management units (i.e., non-containerized CCR located at a regulated CCR facility). Entergy does not have any legacy impoundments; however, the proposed definition of CCR management units appears to regulate on-site areas where CCR was beneficially used. This is contrary to the current CCR rule which exempts beneficial uses that meet certain criteria. Comments on the proposed rule were due in light of the WIIN Act. The EPA has not yet initiated a new round of rulemakingJuly 2023 and has not extended the existing mid-October 2017 groundwater monitoring deadline. Entergy met the existing monitoring deadline, is monitoring state agency actions, and will participatethe rulemaking, in the regulatory development process.part through its trade associations.


Other Environmental Matters

Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Texas

Several class action and other lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts seeking relief from Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and others for damages caused by the disposal of hazardous waste and for asbestos-related disease allegedly resulting from exposure on Entergy Gulf States, Inc.’s premises.

Entergy Louisiana, as successor in interest to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, currently is involved in the second phase of the remedial investigation of the Lake Charles Service Center site, located in Lake Charles, Louisiana.  A manufactured gas plant (MGP) is believed to have operated at this site from approximately 1916 to 1931.  Coal tar, a by-product of the distillation process employed at MGPs, apparently was routed to a portion of the property for disposal.  The same area also has been used as a landfill.  In 1999, Entergy Gulf States, Inc. signed a second administrative consent order with the EPA to perform a removal action at the site.  In 2002 approximately 7,400 tons of contaminated soil and debris were excavated and disposed of from an area within the service center.  In 2003 a cap was constructed over the remedial area to prevent the migration of contamination to the surface.  In August 2005 an administrative order was issued by the EPA requiring that a 10-year groundwater study be conducted at this site.  The groundwater monitoring study commenced in January 2006 and is continuing.  The EPA released the second Five Year Review in 2015. The EPA indicated that the current remediation technique was insufficient and that Entergy would need to utilize other remediation technologies on the site. In July 2015, Entergy submitted a Focused Feasibility Study to the EPA outlining the potential remedies and suggesting installation of a waterloo barrier. The estimated cost for this remedy is approximately $2 million. Entergy is awaiting comments and direction from the EPA on the Focused Feasibility Study and potential remedy selection.  In early 2017 the EPA indicated that the new remedial method, a waterloo barrier, may not be necessary and requested revisions to the Focused Feasibility Study. The EPA plans to provide comments on the revised 2017 Focused Feasibility Study in the next Five Year Review in 2020. Entergy is continuing discussions with the EPA regarding the ongoing actions at the site.

Earnings Ratios (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

The Registrant Subsidiaries have calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
  Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  Twelve Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  December 31, September 30,
  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Entergy Arkansas 3.79
 3.62
 3.08
 2.04
 3.32
 3.70
Entergy Louisiana 2.61
 3.30
 3.44
 3.36
 3.57
 3.86
Entergy Mississippi 2.79
 3.19
 3.23
 3.59
 3.96
 4.82
Entergy New Orleans 2.91
 1.85
 3.55
 4.90
 4.61
 5.17
Entergy Texas 1.76
 1.94
 2.39
 2.22
 2.92
 2.66
System Energy 5.12
 5.66
 4.04
 4.53
 5.39
 4.99

  
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Dividends/Distributions
  Twelve Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  December 31, September 30,
  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Entergy Arkansas 3.36
 3.25
 2.76
 1.85
 3.09
 3.62
Entergy Louisiana 2.47
 3.14
 3.28
 3.24
 3.57
 3.86
Entergy Mississippi 2.59
 2.97
 3.00
 3.34
 3.71
 4.68
Entergy New Orleans 2.63
 1.70
 3.26
 4.50
 4.30
 4.83

The Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense and do not include it in fixed charges.

Item 6.  Exhibits

193

*4(c) -
*4(b) -
*4(c) -
*4(d) -
*4(e) -
*4(f) -
*4(g) -
*4(h) -
*4(i) -
*4(j) -
*4(k) -
*4(l) -
*4(m) -

*12(a)4(e) -
*12(b)4(f) -
*12(c)4(g) -
*12(d)4(h) -
*12(e)4(i) -
*12(f)+10(a) -
*31(a) -
*31(b) -
*31(c) -
*31(d) -
*31(e) -
*31(f) -
*31(g) -
*31(h) -
*31(i) -
*31(j) -
*31(k) -
*31(l) -
*31(m) -
*31(n) -
**32(a) -
**32(b) -
**32(c) -
**32(d) -
**32(e) -
**32(f) -
**32(g) -

194


**32(m) -
**32(n) -
*101 INS -Inline XBRL Instance Document.Document - The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
*101 SCH -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101 PRE -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
*101 LAB -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
*101 CAL -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101 DEF -Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
*104 -Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibits 101).
___________________________

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

*Filed herewith.
**Furnished, not filed, herewith.
+Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements
*Filed herewith.



195

SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.

ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
/s/ Reginald T. Jackson
/s/ Alyson M. Mount
Alyson M. Mount
Reginald T. Jackson
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(For each Registrant and for each as

Principal Accounting Officer)



Date:    NovemberAugust 3, 20172023



186

196