false504501504601504409601--12-31Q32019639 Loyola Avenue425 West Capitol Avenue4809 Jefferson Highway308 East Pearl Street1600 Perdido Street10055 Grogans Mill Road1340 Echelon ParkwayNew OrleansLittle RockJeffersonJacksonNew OrleansThe WoodlandsJacksonUSUSUSUSUSUSUS70113722017012139201701127738039213LAARLAMSLATXMS0000065984000000732300013489520000066901000007150800014274370000202584YesYesYesYesYesYesfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseNon-accelerated FilerNon-accelerated FilerNon-accelerated FilerNon-accelerated FilerNon-accelerated FilerDETXTXTXTXTXARYesYesYesYesYesYesfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse576-4000377-4000576-4000368-5000670-3700981-2000368-5000CHX0.70.70.7500000040000000.0010.0010.0010.001172000000.04750.040.010.0150000000020000000010000005000000002000000001000000261587009465250007893502700351804652500078935046525000789350465250007893500.03170.03650.03380.03920.03220.03422024-09-142020-04-302021-09-162024-09-142021-09-162021-09-162020-05-312020-05-312020-05-312021-11-202024-09-142021-09-164238580002089800055682000636200002836590003384080001401600045386000583820002206250008250001708000130300017472000851700048000053430001454700041260001770001291900053000067600003420001308600010260000.650.650.650.650.655560000036079000014329000497530006045300023633600026817700045960003293900052085000178558000P3YP3Y7253086670947950
Table of Contents





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) 
X
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019
OR
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  
 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________


Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No. 


Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299
ENTERGY CORPORATION
1-35747ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC
(a Delaware corporation)
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone (504) 576-4000
72-1229752
 1-35747
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC
(a Texas limited liability company)
1600 Perdido Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone (504) 670-3700
72-122975282-2212934
     
     
1-10764
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC
1-34360ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)a Texas limited liability company)
425 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone (501) 377-4000
71-0005900
 1-34360
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(a Texas corporation)
10055 Grogans Mill Road
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
Telephone (409) 981-2000
83-191866861-1435798
     
     
1-32718
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
1-09067SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(a Texas limited liability company)
4809 Jefferson Highway
Jefferson, Louisiana 70121
Telephone (504) 576-4000
47-4469646
 1-09067
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone (601) 368-5000
47-446964672-0752777
     
     
1-31508
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
LLC
(a Mississippi corporation)Texas limited liability company)
308 East Pearl Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
Telephone (601) 368-5000
64-0205830
83-1950019   
     



Table of Contents

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
RegistrantTitle of Class
Trading
Symbol
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Entergy CorporationCommon Stock, $0.01 Par ValueETRNew York Stock Exchange
Common Stock, $0.01 Par ValueETRNYSE Chicago, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, LLCMortgage Bonds, 4.90% Series due December 2052EABNew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 4.75% Series due June 2063EAENew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 4.875% Series due September 2066EAINew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Louisiana, LLCMortgage Bonds, 5.25% Series due July 2052ELJNew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 4.70% Series due June 2063ELUNew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 4.875% Series due September 2066ELCNew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Mississippi, LLCMortgage Bonds, 4.90% Series due October 2066EMPNew York Stock Exchange
Entergy New Orleans, LLCMortgage Bonds, 5.0% Series due December 2052ENJNew York Stock Exchange
Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 2066ENONew York Stock Exchange
Entergy Texas, Inc.Mortgage Bonds, 5.625% Series due June 2064EZTNew York Stock Exchange
5.375% Series A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, No Par Value (Liquidation Value $25 Per Share)ETI/PRNew York Stock Exchange


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ No o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit such files).  Yesþ No o


Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Large
accelerated
filer
 
Accelerated
filer
 
Non-
accelerated
Non-accelerated filer
 
Smaller
reporting
company
 
Emerging
growth
company
Entergy Corporationü        
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC    ü    
Entergy Louisiana, LLC    ü    
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.LLC    ü    
Entergy New Orleans, LLC    ü    
Entergy Texas, Inc.    ü    
System Energy Resources, Inc.    ü    


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Common Stock Outstanding Outstanding at October 31, 20182019
Entergy Corporation($0.01 par value)181,142,215199,102,083


Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,LLC, Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf.  Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company.  This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the calendar year ended December 31, 20172018 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 20182019 and June 30, 2018,2019, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.





Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS


 Page Number
  
  
Part I. Financial Information
  
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries 
Notes to Financial Statements 
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries 
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries 


i

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS



 Page Number
  
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.LLC 
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries 
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries 
System Energy Resources, Inc. 
  
Part II. Other Information
  



ii

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


In this combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance.  Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “predict,” “forecast,” and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements.  Although each of these registrants believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct.  Any forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made.  Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
 
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  There are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form 10-K, (b) Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities filings):


resolution of pending and future rate cases, formula rate proceedings and related negotiations, including various performance-based rate discussions, Entergy’s utility supply plan, and recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
long-term risks and uncertainties associated with the termination of the System Agreement in 2016, including the potential absence of federal authority to resolve certain issues among the Utility operating companies and their retail regulators;
regulatory and operating challenges and uncertainties and economic risks associated with the Utility operating companies’ participation in MISO, including the benefits of continued MISO participation, the effect of current or projected MISO market rules and market and system conditions in the MISO markets, the allocation of MISO system transmission upgrade costs, and the effect of planning decisions that MISO makes with respect to future transmission investments by the Utility operating companies;
changes in utility regulation, including with respect to retail and wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs, and the application of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power criteria by the FERC or the U.S. Department of Justice;
changes in the regulation or regulatory oversight of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and fuel, including with respect to the planned, potential, or actual shutdown of nuclear generating facilities owned or operated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, and the effects of new or existing safety or environmental concerns regarding nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel;
resolution of pending or future applications, and related regulatory proceedings and litigation, for license renewals or modifications or other authorizations required of nuclear generating facilities and the effect of public and political opposition on these applications, regulatory proceedings, and litigation;
the performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy’s generation resources, including the capacity factors at Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities;
increases in costs and capital expenditures that could result from changing regulatory requirements, emerging operating and industry issues, and the commitment of substantial human and capital resources required for the safe and reliable operation and maintenance of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities;
Entergy’s ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related commodities;
prices for power generated by Entergy’s merchant generating facilities and the ability to hedge, meet credit support requirements for hedges, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price risk associated with those facilities, including the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants, especially in light of the planned shutdown orand sale of each of these nuclear plants;


iii

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Continued)

the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy’s ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;

iii

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Continued)

volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, emissions allowances, and other energy-related commodities, and the effect of those changes on Entergy and its customers;
changes in law resulting from federal or state energy legislation or legislation subjecting energy derivatives used in hedging and risk management transactions to governmental regulation;
changes in environmental laws and regulations, agency positions or associated litigation, including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, greenhouse gases, mercury, particulate matter and other regulated air emissions, heat and other regulated air anddischarges to water, emissions, requirements for waste management and disposal and for the remediation of contaminated sites, wetlands protection and permitting, and changes in costs of compliance with these environmental laws and regulations;
changes in laws and regulations, agency positions, or associated litigation related to protected species and associated critical habitat designations;
the effects of changes in federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and other governmental actions or policies, including changes in monetary, fiscal, tax, environmental, trade/tariff, or energy policies;
the effects of full or partial shutdowns of the federal government or delays in obtaining government or regulatory actions or decisions;
uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and disposal and the level of spent fuel and nuclear waste disposal fees charged by the U.S. government or other providers related to such sites;
variations in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate the effects of hurricanes, ice storms, or other weather events and the recovery of costs associated with restoration, including accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery mechanisms, securitization, and insurance;
effects of climate change, including the potential for increases in extreme weather events and sea levels or coastal land and wetland loss;
changes in the quality and availability of water supplies and the related regulation of water use and diversion;
Entergy’s ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance costs;
Entergy’s ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
the economic climate, and particularly economic conditions in Entergy’s Utility service area and the northern United States and events and circumstances that could influence economic conditions in those areas, including power prices, and the risk that anticipated load growth may not materialize;
federal income tax reform, including the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and its intended and unintended consequences on financial results and future cash flows, including the potential impact to credit ratings, which may affect Entergy’s ability to borrow funds or increase the cost of borrowing in the future;flows;
the effects of Entergy’s strategies to reduce tax payments, especially in light of federal income tax reform;
changes in the financial markets and regulatory requirements for the issuance of securities, particularly as they affect access to capital and Entergy’s ability to refinance existing securities, execute share repurchase programs, and fund investments and acquisitions;
actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt, and preferred stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating agencies’ ratings criteria;
changes in inflation and interest rates;
the effect of litigation and government investigations or proceedings;
changes in technology, including (i) Entergy’s ability to implement new or emerging technologies, (ii) the impact of changes relating to new, developing, or alternative sources of generation such as distributed energy and energy storage, renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand side management, and other measures that reduce load, and (iii) competition from other companies offering products and services to Entergy’s customers based on new or emerging technologies;technologies or alternative sources of generation;
the effects, including increased security costs, of threatened or actual terrorism, cyber-attacks or data security breaches, natural or man-made electromagnetic pulses that affect transmission or generation infrastructure, accidents, and war or a catastrophic event such as a nuclear accident or a natural gas pipeline explosion;
Entergy’s ability to attract and retain talented management, directors, and employees with specialized skills;

iv

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)

changes in accounting standards and corporate governance;
declines in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding requirements and the effects on benefits costs for Entergy’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans;

iv

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)

future wage and employee benefit costs, including changes in discount rates and returns on benefit plan assets;
changes in decommissioning trust fund values or earnings or in the timing of, requirements for, or cost to decommission Entergy’s nuclear plant sites and the implementation of decommissioning of such sites following shutdown;
the decision to cease merchant power generation at all Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants by mid-2022, including the implementation of the planned shutdowns of Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades;
the effectiveness of Entergy’s risk management policies and procedures and the ability and willingness of its counterparties to satisfy their financial and performance commitments;
factors that could lead to impairment of long-lived assets; and
the ability to successfully complete strategic transactions Entergy may undertake, including mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, or restructurings, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of any such strategic transaction, and the success of the business following any such strategic transaction.




v

Table of Contents


DEFINITIONS


Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
  
ALJAdministrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSCArkansas Public Service Commission
ASUAccounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
BoardBoard of Directors of Entergy Corporation
CajunCajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
capacity factorActual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City CouncilCouncil of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. CircuitU.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DOEUnited States Department of Energy
EntergyEntergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy CorporationEntergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.Predecessor company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Entergy Gulf States LouisianaEntergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes.  The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires. Effective October 1, 2015, the business of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana was combined with Entergy Louisiana.
Entergy LouisianaEntergy Louisiana, LLC, a Texas limited liability company formally created as part of the combination of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and the company formerly known as Entergy Louisiana, LLC (Old Entergy Louisiana) into a single public utility company and the successor to Old Entergy Louisiana for financial reporting purposes.
Entergy TexasEntergy Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.  The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale CommoditiesEntergy’s non-utility business segment primarily comprised of the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating power plants to wholesale customers
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrickJames A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which was sold in March 2017
Form 10-KAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 20172018 filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
Grand GulfUnit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWhGigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
IndependenceIndependence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power, LLC


vi

Table of Contents


DEFINITIONS (Continued)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
  
Indian Point 2Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Indian Point 3Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ISOIndependent System Operator
kWKilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWhKilowatt-hour(s)
LPSCLouisiana Public Service Commission
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtuOne million British Thermal Units
MPSCMississippi Public Service Commission
MWMegawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWhMegawatt-hour(s)
Net debt to net capital ratioGross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents
Net MW in operationInstalled capacity owned and operated
NRCNuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPANew York Power Authority
PalisadesPalisades Nuclear Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Parent & OtherThe portions of Entergy not included in the Utility or Entergy Wholesale Commodities segments, primarily consisting of the activities of the parent company, Entergy Corporation
PilgrimPilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which ceased power production in May 2019 and was sold in August 2019
PPAPurchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCTPublic Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant SubsidiariesEntergy Arkansas, Inc.,LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,LLC, Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River BendRiver Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Louisiana
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
System AgreementAgreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources. The agreement terminated effective August 2016.
System EnergySystem Energy Resources, Inc.
TWhTerawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales AgreementAgreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by the FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
UtilityEntergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companiesEntergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas


vii

Table of Contents


DEFINITIONS (Concluded)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
  
Vermont YankeeVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which ceased power production in December 2014 and was disposed of in January 2019
Waterford 3Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usageElectric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather
White BluffWhite Bluff Steam Electric Generating Station, 57% owned by Entergy Arkansas



viii

Table of Contents





























(Page left blank intentionally)

ix

Table of Contents


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Entergy operates primarily through two business segments: Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.


The Utility business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.  
The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. See “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the operation and planned shutdown and sale of each of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants.
The Utility business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.  
The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. See “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the operation and planned shutdown or sale of each of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants.


See Note 7 to the financial statements herein for financial information regarding Entergy’s business segments.


Results of Operations


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 20172018 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
 

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
 

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
3rd Quarter 2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$403,733
 
$55,765
 
($57,854) 
$401,644
3rd Quarter 2018 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$507,745
 
$105,571
 
($73,498) 
$539,818
                
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits) (253,847) (50,681) (2) (304,530)
Operating revenues 115,943
 (79,717) 30
 36,256
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale (138,700) 6,349
 21
 (132,330)
Purchased power (120,948) (2,072) (21) (123,041)
Other regulatory charges (credits) (32,316) 
 
 (32,316)
Other operation and maintenance 50,746
 24,903
 3,363
 79,012
 23,668
 (72,791) 806
 (48,317)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 
 138,994
 
 138,994
 
 42,871
 
 42,871
Taxes other than income taxes 1,388
 775
 279
 2,442
 10,379
 (6,268) (296) 3,815
Depreciation and amortization (17,013) (12,845) (253) (30,111) 55,786
 (1,716) 521
 54,591
Other income 26,926
 88,207
 (624) 114,509
 (18,467) (82,237) 230
 (100,474)
Interest expense 2,256
 3,386
 7,526
 13,168
 10,273
 (2,766) (935) 6,572
Other expenses (628) (6,271) 
 (6,899) 6,382
 15,707
 
 22,089
Income taxes (367,682) (161,222) 4,103
 (524,801) 208,733
 104,804
 (1,330) 312,207
                
3rd Quarter 2018 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$507,745
 
$105,571
 
($73,498) 
$539,818
3rd Quarter 2019 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$581,964
 
($140,501) 
($72,004) 
$369,459


(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.


Refer to “ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS” for further information with respect to operating statistics.



1

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Third quarter 2019 results of operations includes a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) as a result of the sale of the Pilgrim plant in August 2019. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein and Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale of the Pilgrim plant.

Third quarter 2018 results of operations includes impairment charges of $155 million ($123 million net-of-tax) due to costs being charged directly to expense as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale

1

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet,power business, a $107 million reduction of income tax expense, recognized by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, as a result of a restructuring of the investment holdings in one of its nuclear plant decommissioning trust funds, and a $23 million reduction of income tax expense, recognized by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, as a result of a state income tax audit. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduceshut down and sell all of the size of theremaining plants in Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet. See Note 103 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for discussion of the state income tax audit and restructuring of its interest in the decommissioning trust fund.

Net Revenue


Utility


Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$2,724
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(218
$1,811
)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(277186)
Grand Gulf recovery(39)
Retail electric price(899)
Volume/weather4449

Net wholesale revenue2019 operating revenues26
2018 net revenue

$1,5572,840


The Utility operating companies’ results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from activity inat the third quarter 2018 at Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System EnergyUtility operating companies in response to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes began in second quarter 2018. In third quarter 2019, $91 million was returned to customers through reductions in operating revenues as compared to $277 million in third quarter 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reductions in net revenueoperating revenues were offset by reductions in income tax expense. Entergy Texas’s proposal for the return of its unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes is pending before the PUCT in an unopposed settlement in its base rate case proceeding.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.     


The Grand Gulf recovery variance is primarily due to a reduction in depreciation expense recognized in third quarter 2018 upon FERC approval
2

Table of the settlement in the Unit Power Sales Agreement proceeding, a reduction in income tax expense associated with the reduction in the federal income tax rate in 2018,Contents
Entergy Corporation and a reduction in recoverable decommissioning costs, primarily attributable to increased earnings on the decommissioning trust funds.  This was partially offset by increases in other capacity costs.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the Unit Power Sales Agreement settlement.  See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax CutSubsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Jobs Act.Analysis


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to regulatory charges recorded in the third quarter 2018 to reflect the effects of regulatory agreements to return the benefits of the lower income tax rate in 2018 to customers in Louisiana and New Orleans and a decreaseto:

an increase in formula rate plan revenues implemented with the first billing cycle ofeffective September 20172018 at Entergy Louisiana. The decrease was substantially offsetLouisiana and an interim increase in formula rate plan revenues effective June 2019 due to the inclusion of the first-year revenue requirement for St. Charles Power Station, each as approved by the LPSC;
an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 20182019 at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC,APSC;
a base rate increase effective October 2018 at Entergy Texas, as approved by the PUCT; and
an increase in energy efficiency revenues. formula rate plan revenues at Entergy Mississippi effective with the first billing cycle of July 2019, as approved by the MPSC.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the regulatory proceedings.proceedings discussed above.


2

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1,851 GWh, or 6%, in billed electricityincreased usage including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily driven by small industrials and cogeneration sales, as well as continued growth from new and expansion customers. The increase was partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather during the unbilled sales period.

The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily because of the regulatory lag experienced by certain Utility operating companies as a result of the change in the federal income tax rate in 2018 and its effect on wholesale rates. See Note 2 herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


Entergy Wholesale Commodities


Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2018 to the third quarter 2017:
Amount
(In Millions)
2017 net revenue
$392
Nuclear realized price changes(24)
Nuclear volume(14)
Other(13)
2018 net revenue
$341

As shown in the table above, net revenueOperating revenues for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $51from $380 million infor the third quarter2018 as compared to $300 million for the third quarter 20172019 primarily due to lower realized wholesale energy prices, partially offset by higher capacity prices,the shutdown of Pilgrim in May 2019 and lower volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more non-refueling outage days in the third quarter 2018 as compared to the third quarter 2017.capacity prices.


Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the third quarter2018quarters2019 and 2017:2018:
2018 20172019 2018
Owned capacity (MW)(a)3,962 3,9623,274 3,962
GWh billed7,576 8,2346,847 7,576
  
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet (a)(b)  
Capacity factor90% 98%98% 90%
GWh billed6,976 7,6336,210 6,976
Average energy price ($/MWh)$38.01 $39.94$37.29 $38.01
Average capacity price ($/kW-month)$9.32 $9.09$4.50 $9.32


(a)The reduction in owned capacity is due to the shutdown of the 688 MW Pilgrim plant in May 2019.
(b)The Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants had no refueling outage days in the third quarter 2018 or the third quarter 2017.quarters 2019 and 2018.


Other Income Statement Items


Utility


Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $584 million for the third quarter 2017 to $635 million for the third quarter 2018 to $658 million for the third quarter 2019 primarily due to:



an increase of $11 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $10 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance;
an increase of $9 million in loss provisions;


3

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis




an increase of $16$4 million in fossil-fueleddistribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services; and
an increase of $4 million in storm damage provisions at Entergy Mississippi. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of storm cost recovery.

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease of $11 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an overall highera lower scope of work performed in the third quarter 2019 as compared to the third quarter 2018 and the effect of recording the final court decision in the River Bend lawsuit against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement of approximately $5 million of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as comparedother operation and maintenance expense. See Note 1 to third quarter 2017;
an increasethe financial statements herein for discussion of $15 million in energy efficiency costs;
an increase of $8 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher contract costs;
an increase of $7 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher software maintenance costs and higher contract costs; andthe spent nuclear fuel litigation;
a $6 million loss in third quarter 2018 on the sale of fuel oil inventory per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Act. There is no effect on net income as the loss on the sale of fuel oil inventory is offset by a reduction in income tax expense.expense; and

a decrease of $5 million in energy efficiency costs due to the timing of recovery from customers.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreasedincreased primarily due to:

additions to plant in service, including the St. Charles Power Station;
a reduction of approximately $26 million in depreciation expense recorded in the third quarter 2018 as part of a settlement approved by the FERC in the Unit Power Sales Agreement proceeding; and
new depreciation rates at Entergy Mississippi, as approved by the MPSC, and at Entergy Texas, as approved by the PUCT.

The increase was partially offset by updated depreciation rates used in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses under the Unit Power Sales Agreement, as part of a settlement approved by the FERC in August 2018.FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Unit Power Sales Agreement.Agreement proceeding.


Other regulatory charges (credits) include regulatory charges of $18 million recorded in third quarter 2018 to reflect the effects of regulatory agreements to return the benefits of the lower income tax rate in 2018 to Entergy Louisiana customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.     

Other income increaseddecreased primarily due to changes in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain of the decommissioning trust funds in the third quarter 2018.


Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance in March 2019 of $525 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds by Entergy Louisiana and the issuance in March 2019 of $350 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds by Entergy Arkansas.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Other operation and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased from $184 million for the third quarter 2017 to $209 million for the third quarter 2018 to $136 million for the third quarter 2019 primarily due to:

a decrease of $37 million in nuclear generation expenditures primarily due to an increasethe absence of $19 millionother operation and maintenance expenses in severance and retention costs as a result of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exitthird quarter 2019 from the Merchant Power Business” belowPilgrim plant, which was sold in August 2019. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein and Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for afurther discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the sizesale of the Pilgrim plant; and

4

Table of Contents
Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.Corporation and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The asset
a decrease of $26 million in severance and retention expenses in the third quarter 2019 compared to the third quarter 2018. Severance and retention expenses were incurred in 2019 and 2018 due to management’s strategy to exit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant power business. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to shut down and sell all of the remaining plants in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet. See Note 7 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of severance and retention expenses resulting from management’s strategy to shut down and sell all of the remaining plants in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet.

Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges variance is primarily due tofor the third quarter 2019 include a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) as a result of the sale of the Pilgrim plant in August 2019. Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges for the third quarter 2018 include impairment charges of $155 million ($123 million net-of-tax) in the third quarter 2018 compared to impairment chargesas a result of $16 million ($10 million net-of-tax) in the third quarter 2017. The impairment charges are due to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending,an asset retirement obligation revision and expenditures for capital assets beingassets. These costs were charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired fair value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The increase in impairment charges in the third quarter 2018 is primarily due to $117 million ($93 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges related to Pilgrim primarily resulting from the effects of an updated decommissioning cost study.power business. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduceshut down and sell all of the size of theremaining plants in Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet. See Note 149 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of impairment of long-lived assets.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due See Note 16 to the decision infinancial statements herein and Note 13 to the third quarter 2017 to continue operating Palisades until May 31, 2022. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Businessfinancial statements in the Form 10-K for afurther discussion of the planned shutdownsale of Palisades.    the Pilgrim plant.


Other income increaseddecreased primarily due to higher realizedlower gains on the decommissioning trust fund investments in the third quarter 2018 as2019 compared to the third quarter 2017,2018, including the effect of portfolio rebalancing in the third quarter 2018. See Notes 8 and 9 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of decommissioning trust fund investments.



Other expenses increased primarily due to an increase in nuclear refueling outage expenses as a result of the amortization in 2019 of costs associated with a refueling outage at Palisades.
4

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was 7.3% for the third quarter 2019. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rate was (110.2%) for the third quarter 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, a restructuring of the investment holdings in one of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear plant decommissioning trusts for which additional tax basis is now recoverable, and the conclusion of a state income tax audit involving Entergy Wholesale Commodities. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Note 103 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for discussionsa discussion of the restructuring and the conclusion of the state income tax audit.


The effective income tax rate was 37.6% for the third quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate
5

Table of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by bookContents
Entergy Corporation and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
 

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
 

Utility
 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 

Parent &
Other (a)
 

Entergy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$817,738
 
$252,455
 
($169,129) 
$901,064
2018 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$1,104,078
 
$31,456
 
($210,657) 
$924,877
                
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits) (377,472) (140,849) (13) (518,334)
Operating revenues 3,164
 (83,849) 82
 (80,603)
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale (114,405) 18,559
 71
 (95,775)
Purchased power (244,938) (5,725) (67) (250,730)
Other regulatory charges (credits) (262,114) 
 
 (262,114)
Other operation and maintenance 114,009
 (61,579) 8,444
 60,874
 42,858
 (86,812) (3,128) (47,082)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 
 (124,502) 
 (124,502) 
 (8,599) 
 (8,599)
Taxes other than income taxes 18,478
 (2,337) 451
 16,592
 15,137
 (11,962) (1,142) 2,033
Depreciation and amortization 10,660
 (40,640) (253) (30,233) 79,223
 (2,501) 1,169
 77,891
Gain on sale of assets 
 (16,270) 
 (16,270)
Other income 28,651
 25,853
 (2,464) 52,040
 1,676
 123,799
 (4,894) 120,581
Interest expense 9,449
 7,618
 18,504
 35,571
 21,800
 (1,431) 6,743
 27,112
Other expenses (2,633) (29,664) 
 (32,297) 14,077
 46,036
 
 60,113
Income taxes (785,124) 340,837
 11,905
 (432,382) 406,417
 192,645
 (5,695) 593,367
                
2018 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$1,104,078
 
$31,456
 
($210,657) 
$924,877
2019 Consolidated Net Income (Loss) 
$1,150,863
 
($68,804) 
($213,420) 
$868,639


(a)Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.


Refer to “ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS” for further information with respect to operating statistics.


Results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 include a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) as a result of the sale of the Pilgrim plant in August 2019 and impairment charges of $98 million ($77 million net-of-tax) due to costs being charged directly to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to exit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant power business. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein and Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale of the Pilgrim plant. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for discussion of management’s strategy to shut down and sell all of the remaining plants in Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet.

Results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 include impairment charges of $297 million ($235 million net-of-tax) due to costs being charged directly to expense as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet,power business, a $107 million reduction of income tax expense, recognized by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, as a

5

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


result of a restructuring of the investment holdings in one of its nuclear plant decommissioning trust funds, a $52 million income tax benefit, recognized by Entergy Louisiana, as a result of the settlement of the 2012-2013 IRS audit, associated

6

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

with the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita contingent sharing obligation associated with the Louisiana Act 55 financing, and a $23 million reduction of income tax expense, recognized by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, as a result of a state income tax audit. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduceshut down and sell all of the size of theremaining plants in Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet. See Note 103 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for discussion of the IRS audit settlement, the state income tax audit, and restructuring of its interest in the decommissioning trust fund.


ResultsUtility

Following is an analysis of operationsthe change in operating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2018:
Amount
(In Millions)
2018 operating revenues
$7,390
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(381)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers215
Retail electric price200
Volume/weather(31)
2019 operating revenues
$7,393

The Utility operating companies’ results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from activity at the Utility operating companies in response to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes began in second quarter 2018. In the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $212 million was returned to customers through reductions in operating revenues as compared to $427 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reductions in operating revenues were offset by reductions in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.     

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:

an increase in formula rate plan revenues effective September 2018 at Entergy Louisiana and an interim increase in formula rate plan revenues effective June 2019 due to the inclusion of the first-year revenue requirement for St. Charles Power Station, each as approved by the LPSC;
an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2019 at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC;
a base rate increase effective October 2018 at Entergy Texas, as approved by the PUCT; and
an increase in formula rate plan revenues at Entergy Mississippi effective with the first billing cycle of July 2019, as approved by the MPSC.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the regulatory proceedings discussed above.


7

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 1,741 GWh, or 2%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by increased usage during the unbilled sales period.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Operating revenues for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased from $1,108 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 to $1,024 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily due to the shutdown of Pilgrim in May 2019 and lower capacity prices, partially offset by higher volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from fewer non-refueling outage days.

Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
 2019 2018
Owned capacity (MW) (a)3,274 3,962
GWh billed21,308 21,853
    
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet   
Capacity factor91% 86%
GWh billed19,602 20,096
Average energy price ($/MWh)$40.85 $40.72
Average capacity price ($/kW-month)$4.83 $7.01
Refueling outage days:   
Indian Point 2 33
Indian Point 329 

(a)The reduction in owned capacity is due to the shutdown of the 688 MW Pilgrim plant in May 2019.

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $1,852 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $1,894 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily due to:

an increase of $27 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $26 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance; and
an increase of $13 million in distribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services.

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease of $22 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in 2019 as compared to 2018; and
a decrease of $11 million in energy efficiency costs due to the timing of recovery from customers.

8

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to:

additions to plant in service, including the St. Charles Power Station;
a reduction of approximately $26 million in depreciation expense recorded in the third quarter 2018 as part of a settlement approved by the FERC in the Unit Power Sales Agreement proceeding; and
new depreciation rates at Entergy Mississippi, as approved by the MPSC, and at Entergy Texas, as approved by the PUCT.

The increase was partially offset by updated depreciation rates used in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses under the Unit Power Sales Agreement, as approved by the FERC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the Unit Power Sales Agreement proceeding.

Other regulatory charges (credits) include impairmentthe following significant activity:

a regulatory charge recorded in second quarter 2018 to reflect the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 that resulted in a reduction in net utility plant of $127 million. There is no effect on net income as the regulatory charge was offset by a reduction in income tax expense in 2018; and
regulatory charges of $422$73 million ($274 million net-of-tax)recorded in 2018 to reflect the effects of regulatory agreements to return the benefits of the lower income tax rate in 2018 to Entergy Louisiana customers.

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.     

Other income increased primarily due to costs being charged directlyan increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2019, which included the Lake Charles Power Station, Montgomery County Power Station, and New Orleans Power Station projects. The increase was substantially offset by changes in decommissioning trust fund activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain decommissioning trust funds in 2018.

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

the issuance in March 2019 of $525 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds by Entergy Louisiana;
the issuance in March 2019 of $350 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds by Entergy Arkansas; and
the issuance in May 2018 of $250 million of 4.00% Series mortgage bonds by Entergy Arkansas.

See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 4 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of long-term debt.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $600 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $513 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily due to:

a decrease of $49 million in nuclear generation expenditures primarily due to the absence of other operation and maintenance expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from the Pilgrim plant, which was sold in August 2019. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein and Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale of the Pilgrim plant; and

9

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


a decrease of $29 million in severance and retention expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Severance and retention expenses were incurred in 2019 and 2018 due to management’s strategy to exit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant power business. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to shut down and sell all of the remaining plants in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet. See Note 7 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of severance and retention expenses resulting from management’s strategy to shut down and sell all of the remaining plants in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet.

Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 include a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) as a result of the sale of the Pilgrim plant in August 2019 and impairment charges of $98 million ($77 million net-of-tax) related to nuclear refueling outage spending and expenditures for capital assets. Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 include impairment charges of $297 million ($235 million net-of-tax) related to an asset retirement obligation revision, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets. These costs were charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired fair value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet and a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $373 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of legal entities that own Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants.business. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduceshut down and sell all of the size of theremaining plants in Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet andnuclear fleet. See Note 39 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the tax elections.

Net Revenue

Utility

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:
Amount
(In Millions)
2017 net revenue
$4,765
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(555)
Grand Gulf recovery(74)
Retail electric price(4)
Net wholesale revenue35
Volume/weather203
Other18
2018 net revenue
$4,388

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from activity in 2018 at Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy in response to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  There is no effect on net income as the reductions in net revenue were offset by reductions in income tax expense.  Entergy Texas’s proposal for the return of its unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes is pending before the PUCT in an unopposed settlement in its base rate case proceeding.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. 

The Grand Gulf recovery variance is primarily due to a reduction in depreciation expense recognized in third quarter 2018 upon FERC approval of the settlement in the Unit Power Sales Agreement proceeding, a reduction in income tax expense associated with the reduction in the federal income tax rate in 2018, and a reduction in recoverable decommissioning costs, primarily attributable to increased earnings on the decommissioning trust funds.  This was

6

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

partially offset by increases in other capacity costs.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the Unit Power Sales Agreement settlement.  See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to regulatory charges recorded in 2018 to reflect the effects of regulatory agreements to return the benefits of the lower income tax rate in 2018 to customers in Louisiana and New Orleans. The decrease was substantially offset by the following:

an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2018 at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC;
an increase in energy efficiency revenues;
higher storm damage rider revenues at Entergy Mississippi; and
an increase in the distribution cost recovery factor rider rate in September 2017 at Entergy Texas, as approved by the PUCT.

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the regulatory proceedings discussed above.

The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily because of the regulatory lag experienced by certain Utility operating companies as a result of the change in the federal income tax rate in 2018 and its effect on wholesale rates. See Note 2 herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 4,576 GWh, or 5%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily driven by small industrials sales, as well as continued growth from new and expansion customers.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:
Amount
(In Millions)
2017 net revenue
$1,136
FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement(98)
Nuclear realized price changes(35)
Nuclear volume21
Other(29)
2018 net revenue
$995

As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $141 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to:

a decrease resulting from the reimbursement agreement with Exelon pursuant to which Exelon reimbursed Entergy in the first quarter 2017 for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of FitzPatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had Entergy shut down FitzPatrick in January 2017. Revenues received from Exelon under the reimbursement agreement were offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no effect on net income. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick and the reimbursement agreement with Exelon; and

7

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


lower realized wholesale energy prices and the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, partially offset by higher capacity prices.

The decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from fewer refueling outage days in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, partially offset by a larger exercise of resupply options in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 provided for in purchase power agreements where Entergy Wholesale Commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running.

Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the nine months ended September 30, 2018and 2017:
 2018 2017
Owned capacity (MW)3,962 3,962
GWh billed21,853 22,616
    
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet   
Capacity factor86% 79%
GWh billed20,096 20,861
Average energy price ($/MWh)$40.72 $42.46
Average capacity price ($/kW-month)$7.01 $6.33
Refueling outage days:   
FitzPatrick 42
Indian Point 233 
Indian Point 3 66
Pilgrim 43
Palisades 27

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $1,738 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $1,852 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to:

an increase of $38 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work performed in 2018 as compared to 2017;
an increase of $27 million in energy efficiency costs;
an increase of $12 million in storm damage provisions, primarily at Entergy Mississippi. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of storm cost recovery;
an increase of $11 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher contract costs;
an increase of $10 million in transmission expenses primarily due to higher labor and contract costs to support industrial customers;
an increase of $10 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher software maintenance costs and higher labor costs, including contract labor;
an increase of $6 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals and a higher scope of work performed during plant outages in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017;
a $6 million loss in 2018 on the sale of fuel oil inventory per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Act. There is no effect on net income as the loss on the sale of fuel oil inventory is offset by a reduction in income tax expense; and
an increase of $6 million in vegetation maintenance costs.


8

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The increase was partially offset by higher nuclear insurance refunds of $15 million.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes and payroll taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments.

Other income increased primarily due to changes in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain of the decommissioning trust funds in the third quarter 2018 and an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2018, which included the St. Charles Power Station project.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $661 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $599 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to the absence of other operation and maintenance expenses from the FitzPatrick plant, which was sold to Exelon in March 2017. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $17 million in severance and retention costs as a result of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.

The asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges variance is primarily due to impairment charges of $297 million ($235 million net-of-tax) in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to impairment charges of $422 million ($274 million net-of-tax) in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The impairment charges are due to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The decrease in impairment charges in 2018 is primarily due to Palisades expenditures incurred after September 30, 2017, no longer being charged to expense as incurred but recorded as assets and depreciated or amortized, and the timing of nuclear refueling outage spending and nuclear fuel spending at the remaining impaired Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants, partially offset by an increase in impairment charges related to Pilgrim primarily resulting from the effects of an updated decommissioning cost study. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See Note 14 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of impairment of long-lived assets.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due See Note 16 to the decision in the third quarter 2017 to continue operating Palisades until May 31, 2022. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the planned shutdown of Palisades.

The gain on sale of assets resulted from the sale in March 2017 of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant for approximately $110 million, which included a $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $16 million on the sale. Seefinancial statements herein and Note 1413 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.the Pilgrim plant.

Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains on the decommissioning trust fund investments in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017, including2018. See Notes 8 and 9 to the effectfinancial statements herein for a discussion of portfolio rebalancing in 2018.decommissioning trust fund investments.

9

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis




Other expenses decreasedincreased primarily due to the absence of decommissioning expense from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelonan increase in March 2017 and a reduction in deferrednuclear refueling outage expenses as a result of the amortization in 2019 of costs associated with a refueling outage at Palisades.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 7.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes and the impairmentstax effects of the Indian Point 3, Indian Pointdisposition of Vermont Yankee. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and Palisades plants and related assets. See Note 143 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the saleeffects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of FitzPatrick and impairments and related charges.the tax effects of the Vermont Yankee disposition.

Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was (128.4%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, a restructuring of the investment holdings in one of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear plant decommissioning trusts for which additional tax basis is now recoverable, and an IRS audit settlement for the 2012-2013 tax returns. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Note 103 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for a discussion of the IRS audit settlement and the restructuring.


The effective income tax rate was (10.8%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to a change in the tax classification of legal entities that own Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants, which resulted in both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards and the re-determined tax basis of the FitzPatrick plant as a result of its sale on March 31, 2017, partially offset by state income taxes. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the change in tax classification and the tax benefit associated with the sale of FitzPatrick.

10

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Income Tax Legislation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Income Tax Legislation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017.  

SeeNote 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 2018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K forcontains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size ofshut down and sell all remaining plants in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant nuclear fleet.  Following are updates to that discussion.

Shutdown and Planned Sale of Vermont Yankee Disposition


As discussed in more detail in Note 16 to the Form 10-K,financial statements herein, in December 2014 the Vermont Yankee plant ceased power production and entered its decommissioning phase, and in November 2016,January 2019, Entergy entered into an agreement to selltransferred 100% of the membership interests in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, the owner of the Vermont Yankee plant, to a subsidiary of NorthStar. In March 2018,

Sale of Pilgrim
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy and NorthStar entered into a settlementpurchase and sale agreement andwith Holtec International to sell to a MemorandumHoltec subsidiary 100% of Understanding with Statethe equity interests in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, the owner of Vermont agenciesPilgrim, for $1,000 (subject to adjustments for net liabilities and other interested partiesamounts). On August 22, 2019, the NRC approved the transfer of Pilgrim’s facility licenses to Holtec. At that set forthtime, hearing requests filed by the terms on whichCommonwealth of Massachusetts and Pilgrim Watch challenging Holtec’s financial qualifications and the agencies and parties support the Vermont Public Utility Commission’s approvalsufficiency of the NRC’s review of the associated environmental impacts of the license transfer were pending with the NRC Commissioners. The NRC approval order included a condition acknowledging the NRC’s longstanding authority to modify, condition, or rescind the license transfer order as a result of any hearing that may be conducted.  On August 26, 2019, as permitted by the August 22 order, Entergy and Holtec closed the transaction. On September 3 and 4, 2019, Pilgrim Watch and Massachusetts each filed with the NRC motions to stay the effectiveness of the August 22 order pending the resolution of the NRC hearing process. The agreements provide additional financial assuranceNRC has not yet ruled on the Pilgrim Watch and Massachusetts hearing requests or the stay motions. In addition, on September 25, 2019, Massachusetts filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, asking the court to vacate the NRC’s August 22 license transfer approval order and related approvals. On October 16, 2019, Entergy and Holtec filed a motion to intervene in the U.S. Court of Appeals proceeding. On October 28, 2019, Massachusetts filed a motion for stay pending appeal. The court of appeals has not yet ruled on Massachusetts’ petition.
The sale of Entergy Nuclear Generation Company to Holtec included the transfer of the nuclear decommissioning trust and obligation for spent fuel management and site restoration, and detailplant decommissioning. The transaction resulted in a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) in the site restoration standards that will applythird quarter 2019. See Note 16 to protect the environment and the health and safetyfinancial statements herein for discussion of workers and the public. The provisions of the agreements will become effective upon approval of the transaction by the Vermont Public Utility Commission consistent with the agreements’ terms, the NRC’s approval of the license transfer application, and the closing of the Pilgrim transaction.

Planned Sale of Indian Point Energy Center

In October 2018April 2019, Entergy entered into an agreement to sell, directly or indirectly, 100% of the equity interests in the subsidiaries that own Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, and Indian Point 3, after Indian Point 3 has been shut down and defueled, to a Holtec International subsidiary for decommissioning. The sale includes the transfer of the licenses, spent fuel, decommissioning liabilities, and nuclear decommissioning trusts for the three units.


1011

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



NRC issued
The transaction is subject to closing conditions, including approval from the NRC. Entergy and Holtec also plan to seek an order from the New York State Public Service Commission disclaiming jurisdiction, or alternatively approving the applicationtransaction. Closing is also conditioned on obtaining from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation an agreement related to Holtec’s decommissioning plan as being consistent with applicable standards. The transaction closing is targeted for May 2021, following the defueling of Indian Point 3.

As consideration for the transfer Vermont Yankee’s license to NorthStar for decommissioning. The Vermont Public Utility Commission is expected to issueHoltec of its decisioninterest in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has an outstanding credit facility with borrowing capacity of $145 million to pay for dry fuel storage costs. This credit facility is guaranteed by Entergy Corporation. At or before closing, a subsidiary ofIndian Point, Entergy will assume the obligations under the existing credit facility or enter into a new credit facility, and Entergy will guarantee the credit facility. At the closing of the sale transaction, NorthStar will pay $1,000 for the membership interests in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, and NorthStar will cause Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee to issue a promissory note to an Entergy affiliate.receive nominal cash consideration. The amount of the promissory note issued will be equal to the amount drawn under the credit facility or the amount drawn under the new credit facility, plus borrowing fees and costs incurred by Entergy in connection with such facility. The principal amount drawn under the outstanding credit facility was $132 million as of September 30, 2018. TheIndian Point transaction is expected to result in a loss based on the difference between Entergy’s adjusted net investment in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankeethe subsidiaries at closing and the sale price plusnet of any agreed adjustments. As of September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy’s adjusted net investment in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankeethe Indian Point units was $266$240 million. The primary variables in the ultimate loss that Entergy will incur are the values of the nuclear decommissioning trusts and the asset retirement obligations at closing, financial results from the plant until the closing, and any changes in Entergy’s investment in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee before closing.

Planned Sales of Pilgrim and Palisades

On July 30, 2018, Entergy entered into purchase and sale agreements with Holtec International to sell to a Holtec subsidiary (i) 100% of the equity interests in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, the owner of Pilgrim, and (ii) 100% of the equity interests in Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC, the owner of Palisades and the Big Rock Point Site. The sales of Entergy Nuclear Generation Company and Entergy Nuclear Palisades will include the transfer of each entity’s nuclear decommissioning trust and obligation for spent fuel management and plant decommissioning. At the closing of each sale transaction, the Holtec subsidiary will pay $1,000 each (subject to adjustment for net liabilities and other amounts) for the equity interests in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company and Entergy Nuclear Palisades.

The Pilgrim transaction is subject to certain closing conditions, including: the permanent shutdown of Pilgrim and the transfer of all nuclear fuel from the reactor vessel to the spent nuclear fuel pool; NRC approval for the transfer of the operating and the independent spent fuel storage installation licenses; FERC approval for the change in control of the switchyard; receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS; the market value of the nuclear decommissioning trust for Pilgrim, less the hypothetical income tax on the aggregate unrealized gain of such fund assets at closing, equaling or exceeding a specified minimum amount; and, the Palisades purchase and sale agreement not having been terminated due to a breach by Holtec or its subsidiary.

The Palisades transaction is subject to certain closing conditions, including: the permanent shutdown of Palisades and the transfer of all nuclear fuel from the reactor vessel to the spent nuclear fuel pool; NRC regulatory approval for the transfer of the Palisades and Big Rock Point operating and independent spent fuel storage installation licenses; receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS; the market value of the nuclear decommissioning trust for Palisades, less the hypothetical income tax on the aggregate unrealized gain of such fund assets at closing, equaling or exceeding a specified minimum amount; and, the Pilgrim transaction having closed.

Subject to the above conditions, the Pilgrim transaction is expected to close by the end of 2019 and the Palisades transaction is expected to close by the end of 2022. Each transaction is expected to result in a loss based on the difference between Entergy’s net investment in each subsidiary and the sale price plus any agreed adjustments. As of September 30, 2018, Entergy’s adjusted net investment in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company was $456 million and Entergy’s adjusted net investment in Entergy Nuclear Palisades was $210 million. The primary variables in the ultimate loss are the values of the nuclear decommissioning trusts and the asset retirement obligations at closing, financial results from plant operations until the closing, and the level of any unrealized deferred tax balances at closing. The terms of the transaction include limitations on withdrawals from the nuclear decommissioning trusts to fund decommissioning activities and controls on how Entergy manages the investment of nuclear decommissioning trust assets between signing and closing; however, the agreement does not require a minimum level of funding in the nuclear decommissioning trusts as a condition to closing.


11

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Costs Associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities Strategic Transactions


Entergy expects to incur employee retention and severance expenses associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleetpower business of approximately $155$100 million in 2018,2019, of which $103$70 million has been incurred as of September 30, 2018,2019, and a total of approximately $215$135 million from 20192020 through mid-2022.2022. In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities incurred impairment charges related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets of $155$8 million for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and $297$98 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.2019. These costs were charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of certain of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size ofexit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.power business. Entergy expects to continue to incur costs associated with nuclear fuel-related spending and expenditures for capital assets and, except for Palisades, expects to continue to charge these costs to expense as incurred because Entergy expects the value of the plants to continue to be impaired.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Indian Point

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Indian Point” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC operating licensing proceedings for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 and the settlement reached with New York State in January 2017.  Following are updates to that discussion.

In April 2018 the NRC issued a supplement to the final supplemental environmental impact statement, and in August 2018 the NRC issued a supplemental safety evaluation report. The supplements update the environmental record and safety record related to the Indian Point license renewal. In September 2018 the NRC issued renewed operating licenses for Indian Point 2 through April 2024 and for Indian Point 3 through April 2025.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2017, Entergy reached a settlement with New York State, several State agencies, and Riverkeeper, Inc. under which Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 will cease commercial operation by April 30, 2020 and April 30, 2021, respectively. Operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of Entergy and New York State based on an exigent reliability need for Indian Point generation. In accordance with the FERC-approved tariff of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), Entergy submitted to the NYISO a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement. In December 2017 the NYISO issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of Indian Point. In April 2018 the NYISO issued a determination that the retirement of Indian Point was economically justified and, therefore, did not raise competition concerns.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital.  Following are updates to that discussion.

12

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Capital Structure


Entergy’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The increasedecrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy as of September 30, 20182019 is primarily due to the net issuancesettlement of debtthe remaining equity forwards in 2018.2019. See Note 3 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the equity forward sale agreements.
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Debt to capital68.2% 67.1%65.4% 66.7%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.5%) (0.8%)(0.4%) (0.6%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)67.7% 66.3%65.0% 66.1%
Effect of subtracting cash(1.3%) (1.1%)(1.2%) (0.6%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)66.4% 65.2%63.8% 65.5%



12

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

(a)Calculation excludes the Arkansas, Louisiana, New Orleans, and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas, respectively.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper, capitalfinancing lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, common shareholders’ equity, and subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.

Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in September 2023.2024.  The facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $20 million of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility.  The commitment fee is currently 0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount.  Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation.  The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 was 3.46%3.94% on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of September 30, 2018:2019:
Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $155 $6 $3,339
Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $630 $6 $2,864


A covenant in Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  The calculation of this debt ratio under Entergy Corporation’s credit facility is different than the calculation of the debt to capital ratio above. One such difference is that it excludes the effects, among other things, of certain impairments related to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear generation assets.  Entergy is currently in compliance with the covenant and expects to remain in compliance with this covenant.  If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility’s maturity date may occur.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ credit facilities.

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has a credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $145 million that expires in November 2020. As of September 30, 2018, $132 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September

13

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


30, 2018 was 3.37% on the drawn portion of the facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Vermont Yankee facility.


Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $2 billion. As of September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy Corporation had approximately $1,947$1,918 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 was 2.42%2.88%.

Equity Forward Sale Agreements


In June 2018,January 2019, Entergy marketedNuclear Vermont Yankee was transferred to NorthStar and its credit facility was assumed by Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement Management, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee’s parent company that remains an equity offeringEntergy subsidiary after the transfer. The credit facility has a borrowing capacity of 15.3$139 million sharesand expires in November 2020. As of common stock. In lieu of issuing equity atSeptember 30, 2019, $139 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the timecredit facility.  The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was 4.07% on the drawn portion of the offering, Entergy entered into forward sale agreements with several counterparties. Settlement of the forward sale agreements is expected to occur on or prior to June 7, 2019.facility. See Note 314 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 16 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the equity forwards.transfer of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee to NorthStar.



13

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital


See the table and discussion in the Form 10-K under “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Liquidity and Capital Resources- Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital,” that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 20182019 through 2020.2021. Following are updates to thethat discussion.


Preliminary Capital Investment Plan Estimate for 2019-20212020-2022


Entergy is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates that the Utility will make approximately $11.1$11.4 billion in capital investments during that period and that Entergy Wholesale Commodities will make approximately $0.2 billion$65 million in capital investments, not including nuclear fuel, during that period. The preliminary Utility estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the Lake Charles Power Station, Washington Parish Energy Center, Sunflower Solar Facility, New Orleans Power Station, the Washington Parish Energy Center, and the Choctaw Generating Station, each discussed below, the Lake Charles Power Station, the St. Charles PowerNew Orleans Solar Station and the Montgomery County Power Station; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investments in theEntergy’s nuclear fleet; software and security; and other investments. The preliminary Entergy Wholesale Commodities estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments, such as the investments in the nuclear fleet, component replacement, software and security, and dry cask storage. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of business restructuring, regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


New OrleansSt. Charles Power Station
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. In March 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution approving construction of the 128 MW unit. The targeted commercial operation date is Spring 2020, subject to receipt of all necessary permits by the end of November 2018. In April 2018 intervenors opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station filed with the City Council a request for rehearing, which was subsequently denied, and a petition for judicial review of the City Council’s decision, and also filed a lawsuit challenging the City Council’s approval based on Louisiana’s open meeting law. In May 2018 the City Council announced that it would initiate an investigation into allegations that Entergy New Orleans, Entergy, or some other

14

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

entity paid or participated in paying certain attendees and speakers in support of the New Orleans Power Station to attend or speak at certain meetings organized by the City Council. In June 2018, Entergy New Orleans produced documents in response to a City Council resolution relating to this investigation. The City Council issued a request for qualifications for an investigator and in June 2018 selected two investigators. In October 2018 the investigators for the City Council released their report, concluding that individuals were paid to attend and/or speak in support of the New Orleans Power Station and that Entergy New Orleans “knew or should have known that such conduct occurred or reasonably might occur.”  The City Council held a special meeting on October 31, 2018 to allow the investigators to present the report and for the City Council to consider next steps.  At that meeting, the City Council issued a resolution requiring Entergy New Orleans to show cause why it should not be fined $5 million as a result of the findings in the report. A response to the resolution is due within 30 days from issuance of the certified resolution. Entergy New Orleans disagrees with certain characterizations and omissions of fact in the report and submitted its response to the City Council.

Washington Parish Energy Center


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed an agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the construction and purchase of a peaking plant. In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the plant. In April 2018 the parties reached a settlement recommending certification and cost recovery through the additional capacity mechanism of the formula rate plan, consistent with prior LPSC precedent with respect to the certification and recovery of plants previously acquired by Entergy Louisiana. The LPSC issued an order in December 2016 approving certification that the settlementpublic necessity and convenience would be served by the construction of the St. Charles Power Station. Commercial operation commenced in May 2018.2019.


Choctaw Generating Station


In August 2018, Entergy Mississippi announced that it signed an asset purchase agreement to acquire from a subsidiary of GenOn Energy Inc. the Choctaw Generating Station, an 810 MW natural gas fired combined-cycle turbine plant located near French Camp, Mississippi.  The purchase price is expected to be approximately $314 million.  Entergy Mississippi also expects to invest in various plant upgrades at the facility after closing and expects the total cost of the acquisition to be approximately $401 million.  The purchase iswas contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including full cost recovery, from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  These includeincluded regulatory approvals from the MPSC and the FERC, as well as clearanceFERC. Clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.Act has occurred. In September 2019 the FERC approved the acquisition.  In October 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. In a separate filing in October 2018, Entergy Mississippi proposed revisions to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism, the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costs of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the non-fuel annual ownership costs of the Choctaw Generating Station, as well as to allow similar cost recovery treatment for other future capacity additions approved by the MPSC. Entergy Mississippi executed a joint stipulation as to all issues with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and, in October 2019, the MPSC adopted the joint stipulation which approved Entergy Mississippi’s request to acquire, own, operate, improve, and maintain the facility. The MPSC approved the expected total cost of the acquisition of approximately $401 million and authorized Entergy Mississippi to recover acquisition and ownership costs of the facility through its formula rate plan, including costs incurred before the effective date of the interim capacity rate mechanism, which Entergy Mississippi expects to be approved later this year. Entergy Mississippi purchased the plant in October 2019.

14

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


New Orleans Power Station

In June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility, which was retired effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million. In addition, the application renewed the commitment to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans. In March 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution approving construction of the 128 MW unit. The targeted commercial operation date is mid-2020, subject to receipt of all necessary permits.

In April 2018 intervenors opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station filed with the City Council a request for rehearing, which was subsequently denied, and a petition for judicial review of the City Council’s decision, and also filed a lawsuit challenging the City Council’s approval based on Louisiana’s open meeting law. In May 2018 the City Council announced that it would initiate an investigation into allegations that Entergy New Orleans, Entergy, or some other entity paid or participated in paying certain attendees and speakers in support of the New Orleans Power Station to attend or speak at certain meetings organized by the City Council. In June 2018, Entergy New Orleans produced documents in response to a City Council resolution relating to this investigation. In October 2018 investigators for the City Council released their report, concluding that individuals were paid to attend and/or speak in support of the New Orleans Power Station and that Entergy New Orleans “knew or should have known that such conduct occurred or reasonably might occur.”  The City Council issued a resolution requiring Entergy New Orleans to show cause why it should not be fined $5 million as a result of the findings in the report. In November 2018, Entergy New Orleans submitted its response to the show cause resolution, disagreeing with certain characterizations and omissions of fact in the report and asserting that the City Council could not legally impose the proposed fine.  Simultaneous with the filing of its response to the show cause resolution, Entergy New Orleans sent a letter to the City Council re-asserting that the City Council’s imposition of the proposed fine would be unlawful, but acknowledging that the actions of a subcontractor, which was retained by an Entergy New Orleans contractor without the knowledge or contractually-required consent of Entergy New Orleans, were contrary to Entergy’s values.  In that letter, Entergy New Orleans offered to donate $5 million to the City Council to resolve the show cause proceeding.  In January 2019, Entergy New Orleans submitted a new settlement proposal to the City Council. The proposal retains the components of the first offer but adds to it a commitment to make reasonable efforts to limit the costs of the project to the $210 million cost estimate with advanced notification of anticipated cost overruns, additional reporting requirements for cost and environmental items, and a commitment regarding reliability investment and to work with the New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board to provide a reliable source of power. In February 2019 the City Council approved a resolution approving the settlement proposal and allowing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station to commence.

Also in February 2019, certain intervenors in the City Council proceeding on the New Orleans Power Station filed suit in Louisiana state court challenging the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality’s issuance of the New Orleans Power Station’s air permit. Entergy New Orleans intervened in that lawsuit and, along with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, filed exceptions seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. In June 2019 the state court judge sustained the exceptions and dismissed the plaintiffs’ petition with prejudice. Also in June 2019, a state court judge in New Orleans affirmed the City Council’s approval of the New Orleans Power Station and dismissed the petition for judicial review that had been filed in April 2018. The petitioners have filed an appeal of that ruling. Also in June 2019, with regard to the lawsuit challenging the City Council’s decision on the basis of a violation of the open meetings law, the same state court judge in New Orleans ruled that there was a violation of the open meetings law at the February 2018 meeting of the City Council’s Utilities, Cable, Telecommunications and Technology Committee at which that Committee considered the New Orleans Power Station approval, and further ruled that, although there was no violation of the open meetings law at the March 2018 full City Council meeting at which the New Orleans Power Station was

15

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


approved, both the approval of the Committee and the approval of the full City Council were void. The City Council and Entergy New Orleans have each filed a suspensive appeal of the open meetings law ruling. A suspensive appeal suspends the effect of the judgment in the open meetings law proceeding while the appeal is being taken. The petitioners sought in the state appellate court, and then at the Louisiana Supreme Court, to terminate the suspension of the effect of the judgment, but both courts declined to do so. Appellate briefing on the merits both in the open meetings law appeal and in the judicial review appeal is scheduled to begin in November 2019. The New Orleans Power Station related settlement that was approved by the full City Council in February 2019 and that allowed Entergy New Orleans to move forward with the construction of the New Orleans Power Station was not affected by the state court judge’s open meetings ruling. Construction of the plant is underway and continuing.

Searcy Solar Facility

In March 2019, Entergy Arkansas announced that it signed an agreement for the purchase of an approximately 100 MW to-be-constructed solar energy facility that will be sited on approximately 800 acres in White County near Searcy, Arkansas.  The purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  The project will be constructed by a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources.  Entergy Arkansas will purchase the facility upon completion and after the other purchase contingencies have been met.  Closing is expected to occur by the end of 2021. In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed a petition with the APSC seeking a finding that the transaction is in the public interest and requesting all necessary approvals. In September 2019 other parties filed testimony largely supporting the resource acquisition but disputing Entergy Arkansas’s proposed method of cost recovery. Entergy Arkansas filed its rebuttal testimony in October 2019. A hearing is scheduled in January 2020.


Sunflower Solar Facility

In November 2018, Entergy Mississippi announced that it signed an agreement for the purchase of an approximately 100 MW to-be-constructed solar photovoltaic facility that will be sited on approximately 1,000 acres in Sunflower County, Mississippi.  The estimated base purchase price is approximately $138.4 million.  The estimated total investment, including the base purchase price and other related costs, for Entergy Mississippi to acquire the Sunflower Solar Facility is approximately $153.2 million. The purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including full cost recovery, from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  The project will be built by Sunflower County Solar Project, LLC, a sub-subsidiary of Recurrent Energy, LLC. Entergy Mississippi will purchase the facility upon mechanical completion and after the other purchase contingencies have been met.  In December 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed a joint petition with Sunflower Solar Project at the MPSC for Sunflower Solar Project to construct and for Entergy Mississippi to acquire and thereafter own, operate, improve, and maintain the solar facility.  Entergy Mississippi has proposed revisions to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism, the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costs of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the annual ownership costs of the Sunflower Solar Facility. In August 2019 consultants retained by the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff filed a report expressing concerns regarding the project economics and recommended that, should the MPSC wish to approve the project, Entergy Mississippi should be required to guarantee the energy output of the unit. Entergy Mississippi and the Staff are engaged in settlement discussions to address these concerns.  A hearing before the MPSC is targeted to occur in the fourth quarter of 2019. Closing is targeted to occur by the end of 2021.

Dividends


Declarations of dividends on Entergy’s common stock are made at the discretion of the Board.  Among other things, the Board evaluates the level of Entergy’s common stock dividends based upon earnings per share from the Utility operating segment and the Parent and Other portion of the business, financial strength, and future investment opportunities.  At its October 20182019 meeting, the Board declared a dividend of $0.91$0.93 per share, an increase from the previous $0.89$0.91 quarterly dividend per share that Entergy has paid since the fourththird quarter 2017.2018.




1516

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Cash Flow Activity


As shown in Entergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$781
 
$1,188

$481
 
$781
      
Cash flow provided by (used in): 
  
 
  
Operating activities1,860
 1,713
2,118
 1,860
Investing activities(3,000) (2,828)(3,025) (3,000)
Financing activities1,347
 473
1,382
 1,347
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents207
 (642)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents475
 207
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$988
 
$546

$956
 
$988


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased by $147$258 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


a decrease of $193 million in pension contributions in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding;
athe decrease of $130 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017;
severance and retention payments of $92 million in 2017. See Note 7 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of severance and retention costs in connection with management’s strategy to manage and reduce the risk of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business;
a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement and refund;
the effect of favorable weather on billed Utility sales in 2018; and
an increase due to the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery.

The increase was partially offset by:

lower Entergy Wholesale Commodities net revenue in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 (except for the revenues resulting from the FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement with Exelon), as discussed above. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the reimbursement agreement;
the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to Utility customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;
an increase due to the timing of $50 millionrecovery of fuel and purchased power costs in interest paid in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017 resulting from an increase in interest expense;
income tax payments of $18 million in 2018 compared to income tax refunds of $12 million in 2017. Entergy made income tax payments in 2018 for estimated federal income taxes. Entergy received income tax refunds in 2017 resulting from the carryback of net operating losses; and
proceeds of $23 million received in 2017 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed.2018. See Note 82 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery;
an increase of $94 million due to Vermont Yankee decommissioning spending in 2018; and
a decrease of $30 million in spending on nuclear refueling outage expenses in 2019 as compared to the spent nuclear fuel litigation.same period in 2018.


The increase was partially offset by:

$140 million in severance and retention payments paid in 2019. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to exit the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant power business;
lower Entergy Wholesale Commodities revenues in 2019; and
the effect of less favorable weather on billed Utility sales in 2019.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $25 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to an increase of $197 million in construction expenditures, primarily in the Utility business, as discussed below, partially offset by:


1617

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $172 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to:

an increase of $261 million in construction expenditures, primarily in the Utility business. The increase in construction expenditures in the Utility business is primarily due to an increase of $183 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending in 2018 on self-build projects in the Utility business and an increase of $62 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed during the Grand Gulf outage in 2018;
proceeds of $100 million from the sale in March 2017 of the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick; and
proceeds of $25 million received in 2017 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously capitalized. See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation.

The increase was partially offset by:

$113 million in funds held on deposit in 2017 for principal and interest payments that were due October 1, 2017;
changes in the decommissioning trust funds, including portfolio rebalancing of certain decommissioning trust funds in the third quarter 2018; and
a decrease of $55$116 million in nuclear fuel purchases due to variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle.cycle; and

a decrease of $67 million primarily due to changes in collateral posted to provide credit support to secure its obligations under agreements to sell power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plants.

The increase in construction expenditures in the Utility business is primarily due to:

an increase of $138 million primarily due to investment in the infrastructure of the distribution system, including increased spending on advanced metering infrastructure;
an increase of $76 million in storm spending in 2019; and
an increase of $164 million in transmission construction expenditures due to a higher scope of work performed in 2019 on various projects.

The increase in construction expenditures was partially offset by:

a decrease of $60 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to lower spending in 2019 on various nuclear projects;
a decrease of $40 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in 2019 on various projects; and
a decrease of $36 million in information technology capital expenditures primarily due to lower spending in 2019 on critical infrastructure protection.

Financing Activities


Net cash flow provided by financing activities increased $874$35 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:

proceeds of $608 million from the issuance of common stock as a result of the settlement of the remaining equity forwards in May 2019. See Note 3 to long-term debt activity providing approximately $1,422 millionthe financial statements herein for discussion of cash in 2018 compared to using approximately $309 thousand in 2017. Borrowings andthe equity forward sale agreements;
net repayments of short-term borrowings on Entergy’s long-term credit facility are included in long-term debt activity. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $448 million in net issuances of commercial paper in 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 and a net decrease of $121$111 million in 2018 in short-term borrowings by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities. entities;
an increase of $65 million in treasury stock issuances in 2019 due to a larger amount of previously repurchased Entergy Corporation common stock issued in 2019 to satisfy stock option exercises; and
the issuance of $35 million aggregate liquidation value 5.375% Series A preferred stock in September 2019 by Entergy Texas.

The increase was partially offset by:

long-term debt activity providing approximately $1,274 million of cash in 2019 compared to approximately $1,422 million in 2018;
the repurchase in first quarter 2019 of $50 million of Class A mandatorily redeemable preferred membership units in Entergy Holdings Company LLC, a wholly-owned Entergy subsidiary, that were held by a third party;
an increase of $44 million in common dividends paid as a result of an increase in the shares outstanding and an increase in the quarterly dividend paid in 2019 compared to 2018; and
net repayments of $25 million of commercial paper in 2019 compared to net issuances of $480 million in 2018.

For the details of Entergy’s commercial paper program, the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ short-term borrowings, and long-term debt, see Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.



18

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation” in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, and related regulatory proceedings.


State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding these proceedings.


17

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Federal Regulation


See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding federal regulatory proceedings.


Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments


Commodity Price Risk


Power Generation


As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy in the day ahead or spot markets.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also sells unforced capacity, which allows load-serving entities to meet specified reserve and related requirements placed on them by the ISOs in their respective areas.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward physical power contracts consist of contracts to sell energy only, contracts to sell capacity only, and bundled contracts in which it sells both capacity and energy.  While the terminology and payment mechanics vary in these contracts, each of these types of contracts requires Entergy Wholesale Commodities to deliver MWh of energy, make capacity available, or both. In addition to its forward physical power contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities may also use a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to manage forward commodity price risk. Certain hedge volumes have price downside and upside relative to market price movement.  The contracted minimum, expected value, and sensitivities are provided in the table below to show potential variations.  The sensitivities may not reflect the total maximum upside potential from higher market prices. The information contained in the following table represents projections at a point in time and will vary over time based on numerous factors, such as future market prices, contracting activities, and generation. Following is a summary of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ current forward capacity and generation contracts as well as total revenue projections based on market prices as of September 30, 2018 (20182019 (2019 represents the remainder of the year):




1819

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Portfolio
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 2020 2021 2022
Energy  
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):  
Unit-contingent (b) 98% 95% 86% 87% 66% 97% 97% 92% 66%
Firm LD (c) 10% —% —% —% —%
Offsetting positions (d) (10%) —% —% —% —%
Total 98% 95% 86% 87% 66%
Planned generation (TWh) (e) (f) 6.7 25.6 17.7 9.6 2.8
Planned generation (TWh) (c) (d) 6.1 17.8 9.6 2.8
Average revenue per MWh on contracted volumes:  
Expected based on market prices as of September 30, 2018 $33.6 $40.3 $42.9 $57.3 $58.8
Expected based on market prices as of September 30, 2019 $34.4 $41.6 $56.8 $58.8
  
Capacity  
Percent of capacity sold forward (g): 
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (h) 22% 26% 36% 68% 97%
Capacity contracts (i) 42% 22% 3% —% —%
Percent of capacity sold forward (e): 
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (f) 28% 37% 68% 97%
Capacity contracts (g) 38% 28% —% —%
Total 64% 48% 39% 68% 97% 66% 65% 68% 97%
Planned net MW in operation (average) (f) 3,568 3,167 2,195 1,158 338
Planned net MW in operation (average) (d) 3,167 2,195 1,158 338
Average revenue under contract per kW per month (applies to capacity contracts only) $8.0 $7.2 $1.8 $— $— $3.5 $3.3 $— $—
  
Total Energy and Capacity Revenues (j) 
Total Energy and Capacity Revenues (h) 
Expected sold and market total revenue per MWh $44.1 $46.3 $46.9 $55.3 $47.1 $36.7 $44.9 $54.5 $46.8
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change $44.0-$44.3 $45.8-$46.8 $45.9-$47.9 $54.0-$56.7 $43.3-$50.9 $36.4-$36.9 $44.7-$45.1 $53.6-$55.3 $43.4-$50.3


(a)Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts, or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights.uncertainty. Positions that are not classified as hedges are netted in the planned generation under contract.
(b)Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, the seller is generally not liable to the buyer for any damages. Certain unit-contingent sales include a guarantee of availability. Availability guarantees provide for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold. All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(c)Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, the defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract, a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products. This also includes option transactions that may expire without being exercised.
(d)Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction.
(e)Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear resources considering plant operating characteristics and outage schedules, and expected market conditions that affect dispatch.schedules.
(f)(d)
Assumes the planned shutdown of Pilgrim on May 31, 2019, planned shutdown of Indian Point 2 on April 30, 2020, planned shutdown of Indian Point 3 on April 30, 2021, and planned shutdown of Palisades on May 31, 2022. For a discussion regarding the planned shutdown of the Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, and Palisades plants, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” above.

19

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Palisades plants, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business” in the Form 10-K.
(g)(e)Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions.
(h)(f)A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold.
(i)(g)A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market.
(j)(h)Includes assumptions on converting a portion of the portfolio to contracted with fixed price cost or discount and excludes non-cash revenue from the amortization of the Palisades below-market purchased power agreement, mark-to-market activity, and service revenues.


Entergy estimates that a positive $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets in which the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business sells power, based on September 30, 20182019 market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax income

20

Table of ($1)Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

of $2 million for the remainder of 2018.2019. As of September 30, 2017,2018, a positive $10 per MWhMW change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of $9($1) million for the remainder of 2017.2018. A negative $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets based on September 30, 20182019 market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of $1($2) million for the remainder of 2018.2019. As of September 30, 2017,2018, a negative $10 per MWhMW change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of ($9)$1 million for the remainder of 2017.2018.


Some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations under the agreements. The Entergy subsidiary is required to provide credit support based upon the difference between the current market prices and contracted power prices in the regions where Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells power. The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty.guarantee.  Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of credit support. At September 30, 2018,2019, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had liquidity exposure of $131$85 million under the guarantees in place supporting Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions and $42$21 million of posted cash collateral. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $78$30 million of additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements. As of September 30, 2018,2019, the liquidity exposure associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities assurance requirements, including return of previously posted collateral from counterparties, would increase by $307$140 million for a $1 per MMBtu increase in gas prices in both the short- and long-term markets.


As of September 30, 2018,2019, substantially all of the credit exposure associated with the planned energy output under contract for Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants through 2022 is with counterparties or their guarantors that have public investment grade credit ratings.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The following are updatesis an update to that discussion.


ANOPilgrim


See Note 8 toIn March 2019 the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the NRC’s decision in March 2015 to move ANO into theNRC moved Pilgrim from its “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4, of the NRC’sits Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix and the resulting significant additional NRC inspection activities at the ANO site. In June 2018 the NRC moved ANO 1 and ANO 2 into theto its “licensee response column,” or Column 1,1. Pilgrim ceased operations in May 2019. In August 2019, Entergy transferred 100% of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspectionsequity interests in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, the owner of Pilgrim, to review ANO 1’s and ANO 2’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in Column 4.a subsidiary of Holtec International.


20

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Grand Gulf

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016 the NRC placed Grand Gulf in the “regulatory response column,” or Column 2, of its Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. In August 2018 the NRC moved Grand Gulf into Column 1 of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review Grand Gulf’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in Column 2. Based on performance indicator data for the third quarter 2018, Entergy expects that the NRC will announce that Grand Gulf has moved back to Column 2. In August 2018 operators safely performed a reduction in power to address an operational issue with a plant system. As a result of the power reduction, the threshold for one of the NRC’s performance indicators was exceeded, which results in a Column 2 designation under the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix at least until new performance indicator data is reported in the first quarter 2019.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of new accounting pronouncements. The following are updates to that discussion.


In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).”  The ASU’s core principle is that “a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases.” The ASU considers that “all leases create an asset and a liability,” and accordingly requires recording the assets and liabilities related to all leases with a term greater than 12 months.  In January 2018 the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842,” providing entities the option to elect not to evaluate existing land easements that are not currently accounted for under the previous lease standard. In July 2018 the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” which is intended to simplify the transition requirements giving entities the option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at the date of adoption instead of at the earliest comparative period presented and provides a practical expedient for the separation of lease and nonlease components for lessors. Entergy plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 along with the practical expedients provided by ASU 2018-01 and 2018-11 when they become effective for Entergy in the first quarter 2019.  Entergy does not expect that ASU 2016-02 will materially affect its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows but it will significantly expand the level of lease related disclosure.

In September 2018 the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service.”  The ASU requires entities to capitalize implementation costs associated with cloud computing arrangements classified as hosting arrangements and amortize those costs over the contract term.  These costs are required to be capitalized in the same line as prepayments of the costs, and subsequently amortized in the same lines as the hosting service element of the arrangement.  ASU 2018-15 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2020.  Entergy does not expect to early adopt the standard.  Entergy expects that it will elect to adopt ASU 2018-15 on a prospective basis, which will affect its statement of financial position by presenting implementation costs for hosting arrangements as prepayments, and net income by amortizing those costs as operation and maintenance expense over the contract term of the arrangement. Entergy is evaluating ASU 2018-15 for other effects on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
      
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
2018 2017 2018 20172019 2018 2019 2018
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES              
Electric
$2,697,887
 
$2,793,798
 
$7,276,374
 
$7,056,758

$2,812,934
 
$2,697,887
 
$7,279,683
 
$7,276,374
Natural gas26,352
 26,585
 112,990
 100,011
27,269
 26,352
 112,916
 112,990
Competitive businesses380,080
 423,245
 1,107,606
 1,293,867
300,372
 380,080
 1,023,768
 1,107,606
TOTAL3,104,319
 3,243,628
 8,496,970
 8,450,636
3,140,575
 3,104,319
 8,416,367
 8,496,970
              
OPERATING EXPENSES              
Operation and Maintenance:              
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale729,269
 612,950
 1,638,367
 1,426,462
596,939
 729,269
 1,542,592
 1,638,367
Purchased power439,380
 408,140
 1,252,437
 1,182,404
316,339
 439,380
 1,001,707
 1,252,437
Nuclear refueling outage expenses37,937
 43,273
 116,057
 124,126
52,044
 37,937
 153,447
 116,057
Other operation and maintenance854,013
 775,001
 2,477,699
 2,416,825
805,696
 854,013
 2,430,617
 2,477,699
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges155,215
 16,221
 297,082
 421,584
198,086
 155,215
 288,483
 297,082
Decommissioning93,829
 95,392
 285,834
 310,062
101,811
 93,829
 308,557
 285,834
Taxes other than income taxes161,916
 159,474
 485,682
 469,090
165,731
 161,916
 487,715
 485,682
Depreciation and amortization324,628
 354,739
 1,022,099
 1,052,332
379,219
 324,628
 1,099,990
 1,022,099
Other regulatory charges (credits)37,097
 19,435
 223,416
 (59,314)4,781
 37,097
 (38,698) 223,416
TOTAL2,833,284
 2,484,625
 7,798,673
 7,343,571
2,620,646
 2,833,284
 7,274,410
 7,798,673
       
Gain on sale of assets
 
 
 16,270
              
OPERATING INCOME271,035
 759,003
 698,297
 1,123,335
519,929
 271,035
 1,141,957
 698,297
              
OTHER INCOME              
Allowance for equity funds used during construction32,354
 24,338
 92,367
 65,722
33,161
 32,354
 108,546
 92,367
Interest and investment income177,081
 58,332
 265,086
 194,978
82,295
 177,081
 406,663
 265,086
Miscellaneous - net(43,591) (31,335) (123,439) (78,726)(50,086) (43,591) (160,614) (123,439)
TOTAL165,844
 51,335
 234,014
 181,974
65,370
 165,844
 354,595
 234,014
              
INTEREST EXPENSE              
Interest expense195,311
 178,391
 570,548
 522,857
201,412
 195,311
 603,517
 570,548
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(15,244) (11,492) (43,177) (31,057)(14,773) (15,244) (49,034) (43,177)
TOTAL180,067
 166,899
 527,371
 491,800
186,639
 180,067
 554,483
 527,371
              
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES256,812
 643,439
 404,940
 813,509
398,660
 256,812
 942,069
 404,940
              
Income taxes(283,006) 241,795
 (519,937) (87,555)29,201
 (283,006) 73,430
 (519,937)
              
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME539,818
 401,644
 924,877
 901,064
369,459
 539,818
 868,639
 924,877
              
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries3,439
 3,446
 10,317
 10,338
4,219
 3,439
 12,438
 10,317
              
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
$536,379
 
$398,198
 
$914,560
 
$890,726

$365,240
 
$536,379
 
$856,201
 
$914,560
              
Earnings per average common share:              
Basic
$2.96
 
$2.22
 
$5.06
 
$4.96

$1.84
 
$2.96
 
$4.42
 
$5.06
Diluted
$2.92
 
$2.21
 
$5.01
 
$4.94

$1.82
 
$2.92
 
$4.38
 
$5.01
              
Basic average number of common shares outstanding181,002,303
 179,563,819
 180,845,440
 179,458,914
198,932,387
 181,002,303
 193,876,557
 180,845,440
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding183,664,583
 180,464,069
 182,692,325
 180,163,074
200,492,935
 183,664,583
 195,685,851
 182,692,325
              
See Notes to Financial Statements.              




ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
          
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
2018 2017 2018 20172019 2018 2019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
              
Net Income
$539,818
 
$401,644
 
$924,877
 
$901,064

$369,459
 
$539,818
 
$868,639
 
$924,877

              
Other comprehensive income (loss)              
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of ($8,517), $7,062, ($480), and $17,387)(32,004) 13,213
 (1,645) 32,634
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $4,126, $6,818, $12,919, and $19,034)15,265
 12,297
 47,404
 31,845
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of ($825), $30,644, $1,708, and $72,808)(1,745) 33,395
 (37,242) 82,918
Foreign currency translation (net of tax benefit of $-, $-, $-, and $403)
 
 
 (748)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of ($5,343), ($8,517), $14,547, and ($480))(20,103) (32,004) 62,453
 (1,645)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $6,760, $4,126, $13,086, and $12,919)25,464
 15,265
 48,510
 47,404
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of $1,303, ($825), $17,472, and $1,078)5,271
 (1,745) 33,244
 (37,242)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(18,484) 58,905
 8,517
 146,649
10,632
 (18,484) 144,207
 8,517

              
Comprehensive Income521,334
 460,549
 933,394
 1,047,713
380,091
 521,334
 1,012,846
 933,394
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries3,439
 3,446
 10,317
 10,338
4,219
 3,439
 12,438
 10,317
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation
$517,895
 
$457,103
 
$923,077
 
$1,037,375

$375,872
 
$517,895
 
$1,000,408
 
$923,077
              
See Notes to Financial Statements.              

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Consolidated net income 
$924,877
 
$901,064
 
$868,639
 
$924,877
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 1,517,344
 1,561,565
 1,634,677
 1,517,344
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 82,641
 (90,607) 373,723
 82,641
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges 210,263
 241,838
 225,175
 210,263
Gain on sale of assets 
 (16,270)
Changes in working capital:        
Receivables (153,703) (198,029) (231,005) (153,703)
Fuel inventory 49,728
 20,746
 (14,399) 49,728
Accounts payable 79,949
 (75,962) (175,246) 79,949
Taxes accrued 43,510
 66,895
 (2,420) 43,510
Interest accrued (9,398) (6,111) (2,314) (9,398)
Deferred fuel costs (25,284) (117,636) 90,319
 (25,284)
Other working capital accounts (86,063) (81,779) (19,232) (86,063)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses 28,599
 (10,073) 14,114
 28,599
Changes in other regulatory assets 207,135
 117,430
 (92,861) 207,135
Changes in other regulatory liabilities (413,684) 22,124
 (19,115) (413,684)
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities (345,526) (354,297) (132,044) (345,526)
Other (250,884) (268,147) (400,064) (250,884)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 1,859,504
 1,712,751
 2,117,947
 1,859,504
        
INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Construction/capital expenditures (2,883,047) (2,622,104) (3,079,726) (2,883,047)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 92,829
 66,437
 108,867
 92,829
Nuclear fuel purchases (170,819) (226,054) (55,176) (170,819)
Proceeds from sale of assets 12,915
 100,000
 19,801
 12,915
Insurance proceeds received for property damages 10,523
 26,157
 7,040
 10,523
Changes in securitization account (12,985) (6,494) (4,213) (12,985)
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (4,515) (1,925) (6,184) (4,515)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 
 8,836
Increase in other investments (36,140) (112,217)
Decrease (increase) in other investments 30,370
 (36,140)
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs 
 25,493
 2,369
 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 4,177,919
 1,902,783
 3,518,616
 4,177,919
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (4,187,161) (1,988,634) (3,566,690) (4,187,161)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (3,000,481) (2,827,722) (3,024,926) (3,000,481)
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of:        
Long-term debt 5,604,131
 1,222,606
 7,133,571
 5,604,131
Preferred stock of subsidiary 33,486
 
Treasury stock 24,646
 15,121
 89,303
 24,646
Common stock 607,650
 
Retirement of long-term debt (4,181,820) (1,222,915) (5,859,714) (4,181,820)
Repurchase of preferred membership units (50,000) 
Changes in credit borrowings and commercial paper - net 368,370
 937,677
 (24,550) 368,370
Other 25,540
 (337) (9,175) 25,540
Dividends paid:        
Common stock (482,865) (468,396) (526,408) (482,865)
Preferred stock (10,317) (10,338) (12,328) (10,317)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 1,347,685
 473,418
 1,381,835
 1,347,685

        
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 206,708
 (641,553)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 474,856
 206,708

        
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 781,273
 1,187,844
 480,975
 781,273

        
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$987,981
 
$546,291
 
$955,831
 
$987,981
        
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid (received) during the period for:        
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$558,381
 
$507,912
 
$584,622
 
$558,381
Income taxes 
$18,200
 
($11,883) 
($8,649) 
$18,200
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Cash 
$64,787
 
$56,629
 
$70,395
 
$56,690
Temporary cash investments 923,194
 724,644
 885,436
 424,285
Total cash and cash equivalents 987,981
 781,273
 955,831
 480,975
Accounts receivable:        
Customer 789,633
 673,347
 732,763
 558,494
Allowance for doubtful accounts (15,589) (13,587) (7,987) (7,322)
Other 166,222
 169,377
 132,547
 167,722
Accrued unbilled revenues 426,387
 383,813
 481,048
 395,511
Total accounts receivable 1,366,653
 1,212,950
 1,338,371
 1,114,405
Deferred fuel costs 61,309
 95,746
 
 27,251
Fuel inventory - at average cost 132,916
 182,643
 131,703
 117,304
Materials and supplies - at average cost 747,770
 723,222
 803,843
 752,843
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 149,810
 133,164
 173,229
 230,960
Prepayments and other 248,107
 156,333
 258,695
 234,326
TOTAL 3,694,546
 3,285,331
 3,661,672
 2,958,064
        
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS        
Investment in affiliates - at equity 198
 198
Decommissioning trust funds 7,444,346
 7,211,993
 6,128,647
 6,920,164
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 302,784
 260,980
 326,704
 304,382
Other 436,527
 441,862
 448,140
 437,265
TOTAL 8,183,855
 7,915,033
 6,903,491
 7,661,811
        
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT        
Electric 48,362,347
 47,287,370
 52,705,142
 49,831,486
Property under capital lease 620,419
 620,544
Natural gas 488,169
 453,162
 533,217
 496,150
Construction work in progress 2,832,826
 1,980,508
 2,871,054
 2,888,639
Nuclear fuel 846,845
 923,200
 707,198
 861,272
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT 53,150,606
 51,264,784
 56,816,611
 54,077,547
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 22,057,870
 21,600,424
 22,695,886
 22,103,101
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - NET 31,092,736
 29,664,360
 34,120,725
 31,974,446
        
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS        
Regulatory assets:        
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $388,391 as of September 30, 2018 and $485,031 as of December 31, 2017) 4,728,555
 4,935,689
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $268,177 as of September 30, 2019 and $360,790 as of December 31, 2018) 4,839,357
 4,746,496
Deferred fuel costs 239,446
 239,298
 239,793
 239,496
Goodwill 377,172
 377,172
 377,172
 377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes 21,307
 178,204
 67,438
 54,593
Other 133,555
 112,062
 296,620
 262,988
TOTAL 5,500,035
 5,842,425
 5,820,380
 5,680,745
        
TOTAL ASSETS 
$48,471,172
 
$46,707,149
 
$50,506,268
 
$48,275,066
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$735,009
 
$760,007
 
$520,012
 
$650,009
Notes payable and commercial paper 1,946,677
 1,578,308
 1,917,788
 1,942,339
Accounts payable 1,392,114
 1,452,216
 1,328,631
 1,496,058
Customer deposits 409,153
 401,330
 409,090
 411,505
Taxes accrued 258,477
 214,967
 251,821
 254,241
Interest accrued 178,573
 187,972
 190,877
 193,192
Deferred fuel costs 86,949
 146,522
 115,761
 52,396
Obligations under capital leases 1,466
 1,502
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 57,471
 71,612
 57,374
 61,240
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 500,419
 
 117,575
 248,127
Other 184,255
 221,771
 194,117
 134,437
TOTAL 5,750,563
 5,036,207
 5,103,046
 5,443,544
        
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 4,427,744
 4,466,503
 4,552,456
 4,107,152
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 213,237
 219,634
 206,837
 213,101
Obligations under capital leases 20,887
 22,015
Regulatory liability for income taxes-net 1,802,528
 2,900,204
 1,677,707
 1,817,021
Other regulatory liabilities 1,772,093
 1,588,520
 1,871,005
 1,620,254
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities 6,555,835
 6,185,814
 6,068,323
 6,355,543
Accumulated provisions 506,959
 478,273
 528,172
 514,107
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 2,579,270
 2,910,654
 2,487,906
 2,616,085
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $462,889 as of September 30, 2018 and $544,921 as of December 31, 2017) 15,780,827
 14,315,259
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $338,408 as of September 30, 2019 and $423,858 as of December 31, 2018) 16,938,014
 15,518,303
Other 450,746
 393,748
 783,330
 1,006,249
TOTAL 34,110,126
 33,480,624
 35,113,750
 33,767,815
        
Commitments and Contingencies        
        
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund 197,771
 197,803
 219,411
 219,402
        
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 254,752,788 shares in 2018 and in 2017 2,548
 2,548
EQUITY    
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 270,035,180 shares in 2019 and 261,587,009 shares in 2018 2,700
 2,616
Paid-in capital 5,441,696
 5,433,433
 6,553,009
 5,951,431
Retained earnings 8,953,611
 7,977,702
 9,057,749
 8,721,150
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (632,126) (23,531) (419,772) (557,173)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (73,621,473 shares in 2018 and 74,235,135 shares in 2017) 5,353,017
 5,397,637
Less - treasury stock, at cost (70,947,950 shares in 2019 and 72,530,866 shares in 2018) 5,158,625
 5,273,719
Total common shareholder's equity 10,035,061
 8,844,305
Subsidiary's preferred stock without sinking fund 35,000
 
TOTAL 8,412,712
 7,992,515
 10,070,061
 8,844,305
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 
$48,471,172
 
$46,707,149
 
$50,506,268
 
$48,275,066
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Unaudited)
          



Common Shareholders’ Equity



Common Shareholders’ Equity

Subsidiaries’ Preferred Stock 
Common
Stock
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) TotalSubsidiaries’ Preferred Stock 
Common
Stock
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
             
Balance at December 31, 2016
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,498,584) 
$5,417,245
 
$8,195,571
 
($34,971) 
$8,081,809
             
Consolidated net income (a)10,338
 
 
 
 890,726
 
 901,064
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 146,649
 146,649
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 36,086
 3,363
 
 
 39,449
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (468,396) 
 (468,396)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(10,338) 
 
 
 
 
 (10,338)
             
Balance at September 30, 2017
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,462,498) 
$5,420,608
 
$8,617,901
 
$111,678
 
$8,690,237
             
Balance at December 31, 2017
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,397,637) 
$5,433,433
 
$7,977,702
 
($23,531) 
$7,992,515

$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,397,637) 
$5,433,433
 
$7,977,702
 
($23,531) 
$7,992,515
Implementation of accounting standards
 
 
 
 576,257
 (632,617) (56,360)
 
 
 
 576,257
 (632,617) (56,360)
Balance at January 1, 2018
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,397,637) 
$5,433,433
 
$8,553,959
 
($656,148) 
$7,936,155

 2,548
 (5,397,637) 5,433,433
 8,553,959
 (656,148) 7,936,155
                          
Consolidated net income (a)10,317
 
 
 
 914,560
 
 924,877
Consolidated net income3,439
 
 
 
 132,761
 
 136,200
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 8,517
 8,517

 
 
 
 
 79,145
 79,145
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 44,620
 8,263
 
 
 52,883

 
 20,477
 (16,170) 
 
 4,307
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (482,865) 
 (482,865)
 
 
 
 (160,887) 
 (160,887)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)(10,317) 
 
 
 
 
 (10,317)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(3,439) 
 
 
 
 
 (3,439)
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-02
 
 
 
 (32,043) 15,505
 (16,538)
 
 
 
 (32,043) 15,505
 (16,538)
Balance at March 31, 2018
 2,548
 (5,377,160) 5,417,263
 8,493,790
 (561,498) 7,974,943
                          
Consolidated net income3,439
 
 
 
 245,421
 
 248,860
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 (52,144) (52,144)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 3,035
 12,141
 
 
 15,176
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (160,935) 
 (160,935)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(3,439) 
 
 
 
 
 (3,439)
Balance at June 30, 2018
 2,548
 (5,374,125) 5,429,404
 8,578,276
 (613,642) 8,022,461
             
Consolidated net income3,439
 
 
 
 536,379
 
 539,818
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 (18,484) (18,484)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 21,108
 12,292
 
 
 33,400
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (161,044) 
 (161,044)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(3,439) 
 
 
 
 
 (3,439)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,353,017) 
$5,441,696
 
$8,953,611
 
($632,126) 
$8,412,712

$—
 
$2,548
 
($5,353,017) 
$5,441,696
 
$8,953,611
 
($632,126) 
$8,412,712
                          
See Notes to Financial Statements.See Notes to Financial Statements.            See Notes to Financial Statements.            
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for 2018 and 2017 include $10.3 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented within equity.



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$1,139
 
$1,107
 
$32
 3
Commercial 694
 721
 (27) (4)
Industrial 683
 721
 (38) (5)
Governmental 61
 62
 (1) (2)
Total billed retail 2,577
 2,611
 (34) (1)
Sales for resale 76
 78
 (2) (3)
Other 45
 105
 (60) (57)
Total 
$2,698
 
$2,794
 
($96) (3)

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 11,821
 10,833
 988
 9
Commercial 8,726
 8,271
 455
 6
Industrial 12,879
 12,503
 376
 3
Governmental 714
 682
 32
 5
Total retail 34,140
 32,289
 1,851
 6
Sales for resale 2,978
 3,387
 (409) (12)
Total 37,118
 35,676
 1,442
 4

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating revenues 
$380
 
$423
 
($43) (10)
Billed electric energy sales (GWh) 7,576
 8,234
 (658) (8)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$2,800
 
$2,560
 
$240
 9
Commercial 1,871
 1,861
 10
 1
Industrial 1,905
 1,937
 (32) (2)
Governmental 174
 172
 2
 1
Total billed retail 6,750
 6,530
 220
 3
Sales for resale 215
 202
 13
 6
Other 311
 325
 (14) (4)
Total 
$7,276
 
$7,057
 
$219
 3

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 28,857
 25,810
 3,047
 12
Commercial 22,401
 21,595
 806
 4
Industrial 36,503
 35,829
 674
 2
Governmental 1,934
 1,885
 49
 3
Total retail 89,695
 85,119
 4,576
 5
Sales for resale 8,788
 8,255
 533
 6
Total 98,483
 93,374
 5,109
 5

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating revenues 
$1,108
 
$1,294
 
($186) (14)
Billed electric energy sales (GWh) 21,853
 22,616
 (763) (3)
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
(Unaudited)
              
   Common Shareholders’ Equity  
 Subsidiaries' Preferred Stock Common
Stock
 Treasury
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Total
 (In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2018
$—
 
$2,616
 
($5,273,719) 
$5,951,431
 
$8,721,150
 
($557,173) 
$8,844,305
Implementation of accounting standards
 
 
 
 6,806
 (6,806) 
Balance at January 1, 2019
 2,616
 (5,273,719) 5,951,431
 8,727,956
 (563,979) 8,844,305
              
Consolidated net income4,109
 
 
 
 254,537
 
 258,646
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 12,827
 12,827
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 62,537
 (31,248) 
 
 31,289
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (172,591) 
 (172,591)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(4,109) 
 
 
 
 
 (4,109)
Balance at March 31, 2019
 2,616
 (5,211,182) 5,920,183
 8,809,902
 (551,152) 8,970,367
              
Consolidated net income4,109
 
 
 
 236,424
 
 240,533
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 120,748
 120,748
Settlement of equity forwards through common stock issuance
 84
 
 607,566
 
 
 607,650
Common stock issuance costs
 
 
 (7) 
 
 (7)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 23,391
 11,791
 
 
 35,182
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (172,861) 
 (172,861)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(4,109) 
 
 
 
 
 (4,109)
Balance at June 30, 2019
 2,700
 (5,187,791) 6,539,533
 8,873,465
 (430,404) 9,797,503
              
Consolidated net income4,219
 
 
 
 365,240
 
 369,459
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 10,632
 10,632
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
 
 29,166
 13,476
 
 
 42,642
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 
 (180,956) 
 (180,956)
Subsidiary's preferred stock issuance35,000
 
 
 
 
 
 35,000
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries(4,219) 
 
 
 
 
 (4,219)
Balance at September 30, 2019
$35,000
 
$2,700
 
($5,158,625) 
$6,553,009
 
$9,057,749
 
($419,772) 
$10,070,061
              
See Notes to Financial Statements.            


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
       
  Three Months Ended Increase/  

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$1,155
 
$1,139
 
$16
 1
Commercial 722
 694
 28
 4
Industrial 686
 683
 3
 
Governmental 62
 61
 1
 2
Total billed retail 2,625
 2,577
 48
 2
Sales for resale 63
 76
 (13) (17)
Other 125
 45
 80
 178
Total 
$2,813
 
$2,698
 
$115
 4

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 11,627
 11,821
 (194) (2)
Commercial 8,499
 8,726
 (227) (3)
Industrial 12,861
 12,879
 (18) 
Governmental 705
 714
 (9) (1)
Total retail 33,692
 34,140
 (448) (1)
Sales for resale 3,025
 2,978
 47
 2
Total 36,717
 37,118
 (401) (1)

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating revenues 
$300
 
$380
 
($80) (21)
Billed electric energy sales (GWh) 6,847
 7,576
 (729) (10)
         
         
  Nine Months Ended Increase/  

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars in Millions)  
Utility electric operating revenues:        
Residential 
$2,727
 
$2,800
 
($73) (3)
Commercial 1,872
 1,871
 1
 
Industrial 1,929
 1,905
 24
 1
Governmental 172
 174
 (2) (1)
Total billed retail 6,700
 6,750
 (50) (1)
Sales for resale 223
 215
 8
 4
Other 357
 311
 46
 15
Total 
$7,280
 
$7,276
 
$4
 

        
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):        
Residential 27,749
 28,857
 (1,108) (4)
Commercial 21,764
 22,401
 (637) (3)
Industrial 36,509
 36,503
 6
 
Governmental 1,932
 1,934
 (2) 
Total retail 87,954
 89,695
 (1,741) (2)
Sales for resale 10,009
 8,788
 1,221
 14
Total 97,963
 98,483
 (520) (1)

        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Operating revenues 
$1,024
 
$1,108
 
($84) (8)
Billed electric energy sales (GWh) 21,308
 21,853
 (545) (2)


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)


NOTE 1.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business.  While management is unable to predict with certainty the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report.  Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein.


Vidalia Purchased Power Agreement


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy Louisiana’s Vidalia purchased power agreement.

ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, and the deferral of replacement power costs. In June 2018 the NRC moved ANO 1 and ANO 2 into the “licensee response column,” or Column 1, of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review ANO 1’s and ANO 2’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in Column 4.


Pilgrim NRC Oversight and Planned Shutdown


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC’s enhanced inspections of Pilgrim and Entergy’s planned shutdown of Pilgrim. In March 2019 the NRC moved Pilgrim from its “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4, of its Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix to its “licensee response column,” or Column 1. Pilgrim ceased operations in May 2019. In June 2019, following permanent defueling of the reactor,     Pilgrim was removed from the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process and is now subject to the NRC’s normal decommissioning inspection program. In August 2019 the NRC approved the transfer of the Pilgrim operating license from Entergy to Holtec and the transaction closed on May 31,August 26, 2019. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of the sale of Pilgrim.


Spent Nuclear Fuel Litigation


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s spent nuclear fuel litigation. The following is an update to that discussion.

In September 2018 the DOE submitted an offer of judgment to resolve claims in the second round Entergy Nuclear Generation Company case involving Pilgrim. The $62 million offer was accepted by Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, andAugust 2019 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a final judgment in thatthe amount of $19 million in favor of Entergy Nuclear Generation Company.Louisiana against the DOE in the second round River Bend damages case. Entergy Louisiana received payment from the U.S. Treasury in October 2018.September 2019. The effects of recording the judgment were reductions to plant, nuclear fuel expense, and other operation and maintenance expense. The River Bend damages awarded included $12 million related to costs previously recorded as nuclear fuel expense, $5 million related to costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense, and $2 million in costs previously capitalized.


Nuclear Insurance


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.
 

31

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Non-Nuclear Property Insurance


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.


30

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Employment and Labor-related Proceedings


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s employment and labor-related proceedings.


Asbestos Litigation(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)


See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation.



Grand Gulf-Related Agreements

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding Grand Gulf-related agreements. The following is an update to that discussion.

Capital Funds Agreement (Entergy Corporation and System Energy)

Pursuant to the terms of the Capital Funds Agreement, Entergy Corporation had agreed to supply System Energy with sufficient capital to (i) maintain System Energy’s equity capital at an amount equal to a minimum of 35% of its total capitalization (excluding short-term debt), (ii) permit the continued commercial operation of Grand Gulf, and (iii) pay in full when due all indebtedness for borrowed money of System Energy. Effective July 19, 2019, the Capital Funds Agreement was terminated.


NOTE 2.  RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities


See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries.  The following are updates to that discussion.


Regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act


SeeSystem Energy

In a filing made with the Other Tax Matters - Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” sectionFERC in Note 3March 2018, Entergy proposed revisions to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion ofUnit Power Sales Agreement, among other agreements, to reflect the effects of the enactment in December 2017Tax Act. In the filing System Energy proposed to return all of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act), including its effects on Entergy’s and the Registrant Subsidiaries’ regulatory asset/liability for income taxes.

After assessing the activity described in more detail below regarding the status of the proposals the Registrant Subsidiaries made to their regulators for the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to its customers by the end of 2018. In May 2018 the FERC accepted System Energy’s proposed tax revisions with an effective date of June 1, 2018, subject to refund and the outcome of settlement and hearing procedures.  Settlement discussions were terminated in 2018, EntergyApril 2019, and eachthe hearing is scheduled for March 2020. The retail regulators of the Registrant SubsidiariesUtility operating companies that are reclassifying from the regulatory liability for income taxes to current liabilities the portion of their unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes that they expect to return to customers over the next twelve months.

Entergy Arkansas

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the activity of the APSC and Entergy Arkansas after enactment of the Tax Act in December 2017. The APSC granted Entergy Arkansas’s request for clarification regarding the APSC’s order issued after enactment of the Tax Act. The APSC stated that its order was not a final determination and that the APSC had made no decision at that time on the appropriate final accounting or ratemaking treatment of the amounts in question. A hearing was held in May 2018 regarding the APSC’s inquiries into the effects of the Tax Act, including Entergy Arkansas’s proposal to utilize its existing formula rate plan rider for its customers to realize the remaining benefits of the Tax Act. Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan rider includes a netting adjustment that compares actual annual costs and salesparties to the projected annual costsUnit Power Sales Agreement are challenging the treatment and sales used to establish rates. In July 2018 the APSC issued an order agreeing with Entergy Arkansas’s proposal to have the effects on current incomeamount of excess tax expense flow through Entergy Arkansas’s formula rate plan rider and Entergy Arkansas’s treatment of protected and unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes. The APSC also directed Entergy Arkansas to submit in the tax adjustment rider proceeding, discussed below, the adjustments to all other riders affected by the Tax Act and to include an amendment for a true-up mechanism where a rider affected by the Tax Act does not already contain a true-up mechanism. Entergy Arkansas’s compliance tariff filings were accepted by the APSC in October 2018.
Consistent with its previously stated intent to return unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers as expeditiously as possible, Entergy Arkansas initiated a tariff proceeding in February 2018 proposing to establish a tax adjustment rider to provide retail customers with certain tax benefitsliabilities associated with the Tax Act. For the residential customer class, the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes will be returneduncertain tax positions related to nuclear decommissioning.



3132

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Fuel and purchased power cost recovery

Entergy Arkansas

Production Cost Allocation Rider

In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination pursuant to the production cost allocation rider, which reflected a credit to customers overfor the recovery of the true-up adjustment resulting from the 2018 over-recovered retail balance of $0.1 million and the recovery of a 21-month$4.2 million payment to Entergy Arkansas as a result of the FERC’s May 2018 decision in the 2005 bandwidth proceeding, in which the FERC directed a compliance filing to be made that consisted of the comprehensive recalculation of the bandwidth formula rate with true-up payments and receipts based on test period from April 2018data for June 1, 2005 through December 2019. For all other customer classes,31, 2005. The rates for the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes will be returned2019 production cost allocation rider update are effective July 2019 through June 2020.

Energy Cost Recovery Rider

In March 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to customers over a nine-month period from April 2018 through December 2018. A true-up provision also was included, with any over- or under-returned unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to be credited or billed to customers during the billing month of January 2020, with any residual amounts of over- or under-returned unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to be flowed through Entergy Arkansas’s energy cost recovery rider. In March 2018 the APSC approved the tax adjustment rider, which reflected a decrease from $0.01882 per kWh to $0.01462 per kWh and became effective with the first billing cycle in April 2019. In March 2019 the Arkansas Attorney General filed a response to Entergy Arkansas’s annual adjustment and included with its filing a motion for investigation of alleged overcharges to customers in connection with the FERC’s October 2018 order in the opportunity sales proceeding. Entergy Arkansas filed its response to the Attorney General’s motion in April 2018.2019 in which Entergy Arkansas stated its intent to initiate a proceeding to address recovery issues related to the October 2018 FERC order. In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas initiated the opportunity sales recovery proceeding, discussed below, and requested that the APSC establish that proceeding as the single designated proceeding in which interested parties may assert claims related to the appropriate retail rate treatment of the FERC October 2018 order and related FERC orders in the opportunity sales proceeding. In June 2019 the APSC granted Entergy Arkansas’s request and also denied the Attorney General’s motion in the energy cost recovery proceeding seeking an investigation into Entergy Arkansas’s annual energy cost recovery rider adjustment and referred the evaluation of such matters to the opportunity sales recovery proceeding.


Entergy Louisiana


SeeIn July 2014 the Form 10-K forLPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a discussionreview of the activityreasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Louisiana through its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. In January 2019 the LPSC and Entergy Louisiana after enactment of the Tax Act in December 2017. In July 2018 the LPSCstaff issued a proposed rule requiring utilities to adjust rates prospectively to reflect the lower tax rate (either through a formula rate plan or rate case), refund excess tax expense collected since January 1, 2018 until the lower tax rate is reflected in rates (with the refund occurring over one year), and refund excess accumulated deferred income taxes over two years. Entergy Louisiana believes that its formula rate plan settlement, approved in April 2018 and discussed below, addresses fully its obligations regarding the Tax Act and will seek such confirmation in its comments to the proposed rule.

In the formula rate plan settlement approved by the LPSC in April 2018 the parties agreedaudit report recommending that Entergy Louisiana will returnrefund approximately $7.3 million, plus interest, to customers one-halfbased upon the imputation of a claim of vendor fault in servicing its eligible unprotected excess deferred income taxes from May 2018 through December 2018nuclear plant. Entergy Louisiana recorded a provision in the first quarter 2019 for the potential outcome of the audit. In August 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed direct testimony challenging the basis for the LPSC staff’s recommended disallowance and returnproviding an alternative calculation of replacement power costs should it be determined that a disallowance is appropriate. Entergy Louisiana’s calculation would require a refund to customers of approximately $4.2 million, plus interest, as compared to the other half from January 2019 through August 2022. In addition, the parties agreed that in order to flow back to customers certain other tax benefits createdLPSC staff’s recommendation of $7.3 million, plus interest. Responsive testimony was filed by the Tax Act, Entergy Louisiana would establish a regulatory liability effective January 1, 2018 in the amount of $9.1 million per month to reflect these tax benefits already included in retail rates until new base rates under the formula rate plan are established (September 2018), and this regulatory liability will be returned to customers over the next formula rate plan rate-effective period (September 2018 through August 2019). As of September 30, 2018, Entergy Louisiana has a $67 million regulatory liability recorded pursuant to this provision of the settlement. The LPSC staff and intervenors in September 2019; all parties either agreed with or did not oppose Entergy Louisiana’s alternative calculation of replacement power costs. In September 2019 the procedural schedule was suspended to facilitate settlement reserved the right to obtain data from Entergy Louisiana to confirm the determination of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Act and analysis thereof as part of the formula rate plan review proceeding for the 2017 test year filing, which, as discussed below, Entergy Louisiana filed in June 2018.negotiations.


Entergy Mississippi

As discussed in the Form 10-K, after enactment of the Tax Act the MPSC ordered utilities, including Entergy Mississippi, that operate under a formula rate plan to file a description by February 26, 2018, of how the Tax Act will be reflected in the formula rate plan under which the utility operates. Entergy Mississippi's plan, as filed with the MPSC on February 26, 2018, included a request to reflect the changes related to the Tax Act in the 2018 formula rate plan filing. Entergy Mississippi filed its 2018 formula rate plan on March 15, 2018 and included a proposal to return all of its unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers through rates or in exchange for other assets, or a combination of both, by the end of 2018.

Also, in March 2018 the MPSC issued a subsequent order in its generic tax reform docket ordering utilities, including Entergy Mississippi, to explain the implementation of the utilities tax adjustment clause, or, in the alternative, why the tax adjustment clause is inapplicable; submit an analysis of the ratemaking effects of the Tax Act on current and future revenue requirements for rate schedules that include a gross-up for federal taxes; and make appropriate accounting entries to recognize the removal of excess deferred taxes from the balance of the utility’s accumulated deferred income tax account, or, in the alternative, explain why recording such entries is not appropriate. In April 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed its response to the MPSC stating that the tax adjustment clauses in its base rates are properly implemented through its formula rate plan. Entergy Mississippi also provided analysis of the ratemaking effects of the Tax Act.


32

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In June 2018, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into and filed a joint stipulation in Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan filing that addressed Entergy Mississippi’s 2018 formula rate plan evaluation report and the ratemaking effects of the Tax Act. Also in June 2018 the MPSC approved the stipulation, which provides for incorporating the reduction of the statutory federal income tax rate through the formula rate plan. Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan includes a look-back evaluation report filing in March 2019 that will compare actual 2018 results to the allowed return on rate base. The stipulation provides for the flow-back of protected excess accumulated deferred income taxes over approximately 40 years through the formula rate plan. The stipulation also provides for the offset of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes of $127.2 million against net utility plant and $2.2 million against other regulatory assets, and the return to customers of the remaining balance of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes as recovery of a portion of fuel oil inventory and customer bill credits over a three-month period from July 2018 through September 2018, with any true-up to be reflected in the November 2018 power management rider submittal. Entergy Mississippi recorded the reduction against net utility plant and other regulatory assets in June 2018. In third quarter 2018, Entergy Mississippi returned unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes of $25.8 million through customer bill credits and $5.8 million through the sale of fuel oil inventory.

Entergy New Orleans

As discussed in the Form 10-K, after enactment of the Tax Act the City Council passed a resolution ordering Entergy New Orleans to, effective January 1, 2018, record regulatory liabilities to account for the Tax Act’s effect on Entergy New Orleans’s revenue requirement and to make a filing by mid-March 2018 regarding the Tax Act’s effects on Entergy New Orleans’s operating income and rate base and potential mechanisms for customers to receive benefits of the Tax Act. The City Council’s resolution also directed Entergy New Orleans to request that Entergy Services file with the FERC for revisions of the Unit Power Sales Agreement and MSS-4 replacement tariffs to address the return of excess accumulated deferred income taxes. Entergy has submitted filings of this type to the FERC.

In March 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed its response to the resolution stating that the Tax Act reduced income tax expense from what is presently reflected in rates by approximately $8.2 million annually for electric operations and by approximately $1.3 million annually for gas operations. In the filing, Entergy New Orleans proposed to return to customers from June 2018 through August 2019 the benefits of the reduction in income tax expense and its unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a combination of bill credits and investments in energy efficiency programs, grid modernization, and Smart City projects. Entergy New Orleans submitted supplemental information in April 2018 and May 2018. Shortly thereafter, Entergy New Orleans and the City Council’s advisors reached an agreement in principle that provides for benefits that will be realized by Entergy New Orleans customers through bill credits starting in July 2018 and offsets to future investments in energy efficiency programs, grid modernization, and Smart City projects, as well as additional benefits related to the filings made at FERC. The agreement in principle was approved by the City Council in June 2018.

Entergy Texas

As discussed below, in May 2018, Entergy Texas filed its 2018 base rate case with the PUCT. Entergy Texas’s proposed rates and revenues reflect the inclusion of the federal income tax reductions due to the Tax Act. See the discussion below regarding the terms of an unopposed settlement submitted by the parties to the 2018 rate case that, if approved by the PUCT, establishes the amounts and timing of the return of protected and unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to Entergy Texas customers.

System Energy

In a filing made with the FERC in March 2018, Entergy proposed revisions to the Unit Power Sales Agreement, among other agreements, to reflect the effects of the Tax Act. In the filing, System Energy proposed to return all of its unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to its customers by the end of 2018. In May 2018 the FERC

33

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

accepted System Energy’s proposed tax revisions with an effective date of June 1, 2018, subject to refund and the outcome of settlement and hearing procedures.  Settlement discussions are ongoing.

Fuel and purchased power cost recovery

Entergy Arkansas

Energy Cost Recovery Rider

In March 2018, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the rate from $0.01547 per kWh to $0.01882 per kWh. The Arkansas Attorney General filed a response to Entergy Arkansas’s annual redetermination filing requesting that the APSC suspend the proposed tariff to investigate the amount of the redetermination or, alternatively, to allow recovery subject to refund. Among the reasons the Attorney General cited for suspension were questions pertaining to how Entergy Arkansas forecasted sales and potential implications of the Tax Act. Entergy Arkansas replied to the Attorney General’s filing and stated that, to the extent there are questions pertaining to its load forecasting or the operation of the energy cost recovery rider, those issues exceed the scope of the instant rate redetermination. Entergy Arkansas also stated that potential effects of the Tax Act are appropriately considered in the APSC’s separate proceeding looking at potential implications of the new tax law. The APSC general staff filed a reply to the Attorney General’s filing and agreed that Entergy Arkansas’s filing complied with the terms of the energy cost recovery rider. The redetermined rate became effective with the first billing cycle of April 2018. Subsequently in April 2018 the APSC issued an order declining to suspend Entergy Arkansas’s energy cost recovery rider rate and declining to require further investigation at that time of the issues suggested by the Attorney General in the proceeding. Following a period of discovery, the Attorney General filed a supplemental response in October 2018 raising new issues with Entergy Arkansas’s March 2018 rate redetermination and asserting that $45.7 million of the increase should be collected subject to refund pending further investigation. Also in October 2018, Entergy Arkansas filed to dismiss the Attorney General’s supplemental response, the APSC general staff filed a motion to strike the Attorney General’s filing, and the Attorney General filed its supplemental response disputing Entergy Arkansas and the APSC staff’s filing.

Entergy Louisiana

In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of the fuel adjustment clause filings by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, whose business was combined with Entergy Louisiana in 2015.  The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013.  Discovery commenced in July 2015.  No report of audit has been issued.

In May 2018 the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause filings.  The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause for the period from 2016 through 2017.  Discovery commenced in September 2018.  No report of audit has been issued.

Entergy Mississippi


Mississippi Attorney General Complaint


As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi Attorney General filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, and breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The defendants have denied the allegations. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery ended in May 2018. In June 2018, Entergy filed motions for summary judgment, which are currently pending before the District Court. In July 2018 the Attorney General filed briefs opposing the summary judgment.


3433

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



and restitution. Entergy believes the complaint is unfounded. In September 2018 the District Court held oral arguments on the Entergy companies’ motion to strikeDecember 2008 the Attorney General’s jury demand. At the hearing, the Attorney General withdrew his oppositionlawsuit was removed to the Entergy companies’ motion to strike the Attorney General’s jury demand.U.S. District Court in Jackson, Mississippi. Pre-trial and settlement conferences were held in October 2018. In October 2018 the District Court rescheduled the trial to April 2019. In April 2019 the District Court remanded the Attorney General’s lawsuit to the Hinds County Chancery Court in Jackson, Mississippi. A hearing on procedural and dispositive motions was held in August 2019. Following the parties’ oral arguments, the Attorney General filed a post hearing brief, to which Entergy Mississippi filed a response. The motions remain pending before the chancellor of the Hinds County Chancery Court.


Entergy Texas

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2015 certain parties filed briefs in an open PUCT proceeding asserting that Entergy Texas should refund to retail customers an additional $10.9 million in bandwidth remedy payments Entergy Texas received related to calendar year 2006 production costs.  In October 2015 an ALJ issued a proposal for decision recommending that the additional bandwidth remedy payments be refunded to retail customers. In January 2016 the PUCT issued its order affirming the ALJ’s recommendation, and Entergy Texas filed a motion for rehearing of the PUCT’s decision, which the PUCT denied. In March 2016, Entergy Texas filed a complaint in Federal District Court for the Western District of Texas and a petition in the Travis County (State) District Court appealing the PUCT’s decision. The pending appeals did not stay the PUCT’s decision, and Entergy Texas refunded to customers the $10.9 million over a four-month period beginning with the first billing cycle of July 2016. The federal appeal of the PUCT’s January 2016 decision was heard in December 2016, and the Federal District Court granted Entergy Texas’s requested relief. In January 2017 the PUCT and an intervenor filed petitions for appeal of the Federal District Court ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral argument was held before the Fifth Circuit in February 2018. In April 2018 the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision of the Federal District Court, reinstating the original PUCT decision. In October 2018, Entergy Texas filed a notice of nonsuit in its appeal to the Travis County District Court regarding the PUCT’s January 2016 decision.


In December 2017,September 2019, Entergy Texas filed an application to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for athe period from April 2016 through March 2019. During the reconciliation period, Entergy Texas incurred approximately $1.6 billion in Texas jurisdictional eligible fuel refundand purchased power expenses, net of certain revenues credited to such expenses and other adjustments. Entergy Texas estimated an under-recovery balance of approximately $30.5$25.8 million, including interest, which Entergy Texas requested authority to carry over as the beginning balance for the months of May 2017 through October 2017. Also in December 2017, the PUCT’s ALJ approved the refund on an interim basis. For most customers, the refunds flowed through billssubsequent reconciliation period beginning January 2018 and continued through March 2018.April 2019. The fuel refund was approved by the PUCT in March 2018.proceeding is currently pending.


Retail Rate Proceedings


See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies.  The following are updates to that information.discussion.


Filings with the APSC (Entergy Arkansas)


2018Retail Rates

2019 Formula Rate Plan Filing


In July 2018,2019, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 20182019 formula rate plan filing to set its formula rate for the 20192020 calendar year. The filing showscontained an evaluation of Entergy Arkansas’s earnings for the projected earnedyear 2020 and a netting adjustment for the historical year 2018.  The total proposed formula rate plan rider revenue change designed to produce a target rate of return on common equity of 9.75% is $15.3 million, which is based upon a deficiency of approximately $61.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 test period to be below2020 projected year, netted with a credit of approximately $46.6 million in the formula2018 historical year netting adjustment. During 2018, Entergy Arkansas experienced higher-than expected sales volume, and actual costs were lower than forecasted.  These changes, coupled with a reduced income tax rate plan bandwidth. Additionally,resulting from the filing includesTax Cuts and Jobs Act, resulted in the first netting adjustment under the current formula rate plancredit for the historical test year 2017, which isnetting adjustment. In the fourth quarter 2018, Entergy Arkansas recorded a comparisonprovision of projected costs and sales approved$35.1 million that reflected the estimate of the historical year netting adjustment that was expected to be included in the 2016 formula rate plan filing2019 filing. In 2019, Entergy Arkansas recorded additional provisions totaling $11.5 million to actual 2017 costs and sales data. The filing includes a projected $73.4 millionrevenue deficiency for 2019 and a $95.6 million revenue deficiency forreflect the 2017 historical test year, for a total revenue requirement of $169 million for this filing. By operationupdated estimate of the formula rate plan,historical year netting adjustment included in the 2019 filing.  In October 2019 other parties in the proceeding filed their errors and objections requesting certain adjustments to Entergy Arkansas’s recoveryfiling, which, if granted, would reduce or eliminate Entergy Arkansas’s proposed revenue change. Entergy Arkansas filed its response addressing the requested adjustments in October 2019. In its response, Entergy Arkansas accepted certain of the revenue requirement is subject to a four percent annual revenue constraint. Because Entergy Arkansas’s revenue requirement in this filing exceedsadjustments recommended by the constraint, the resulting increase is limited to four percentGeneral Staff of total revenue, which is $65.4 million. The matter is scheduled for hearing in November 2018, and Entergy Arkansas requested that the APSC issue an order approvingthat would reduce the proposed formula rate plan adjustment in December 2018,rider revenue change to $14 million. Entergy Arkansas disputed the remaining adjustments proposed by the parties. In October 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed a unanimous settlement agreement with the proposedother parties in the proceeding seeking APSC approval of a revised total formula rate plan adjustment effective with the first billing cyclerider revenue change of $10.1 million. The proposed new formula rates would go into effect in January 2019.2020. In October 2018 the APSC staff and intervening parties filed their errors and objections to Entergy Arkansas’s 2018its July 2019 formula rate plan filing, although no partyEntergy Arkansas proposed adjustmentsto recover an $11.2 million regulatory asset, amortized over five years, associated with specific costs related to the potential construction of scrubbers at the White Bluff plant. While Entergy Arkansas does not concede that would servethe regulatory asset does not have merit, for purposes of reaching a settlement amount on the total formula rate plan rider change Entergy Arkansas agreed not to reduceinclude the requested revenueamounts associated with the White Bluff scrubber regulatory asset in the 2019 formula rate plan filing or future filings. Entergy Arkansas will record a


3534

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


requirement below the annual revenue constraint. Entergy Arkansas also filed its rebuttal to the APSC staff and intervenors in October 2018. Later in October 2018 the parties submitted motions, which are pending with the APSC, to approve a partial settlement as to certain factual issues and to brief certain contested legal issues.

Similar to the 2018 filing, the formula rate plan filing that will be made in 2019 to set the formula rates for the 2020 calendar year will include a netting adjustment that will compare projected costs and sales for 2018 that were approved in the 2017 formula rate plan filing to actual 2018 costs and sales data. To the extent that Entergy Arkansas expects this netting adjustment to reflect actual 2018 revenues that are in excesswrite off of the actual costs for that year, Entergy Arkansas will record a$11.2 million White Bluff scrubber regulatory provision in the fourth quarter 2018.asset.

Internal Restructuring

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed an application with the APSC seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy Arkansas to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. Entergy Arkansas also filed a notice with the Missouri Public Service Commission in December 2017 out of an abundance of caution, although Entergy Arkansas does not serve any retail customers in Missouri. In April 2018 the Missouri Public Service Commission approved Entergy Arkansas’s filing. In July 2018, Entergy Arkansas filed a settlement, reached by all parties in the APSC proceeding, resolving all issues. The APSC approved the settlement agreement and restructuring in August 2018. Entergy expects to realize a permanent tax benefit at closing, and, pursuant to the settlement agreement, Entergy Arkansas will credit retail customers $39.6 million over six years, beginning in 2019. Entergy Arkansas has also received the required FERC and NRC approvals. The restructuring is anticipated to close on or before December 1, 2018.


Filings with the LPSC (Entergy Louisiana)


Retail Rates - Electric


20162017 Formula Rate Plan Filing


As discussed in the Form 10-K,Commercial operation at St. Charles Power Station commenced in May 2019. In May 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed an update to its 2017 formula rate plan evaluation report to include the estimated first-year revenue requirement of $109.5 million associated with the St. Charles Power Station. The resulting interim adjustment to rates became effective with the first billing cycle of June 2019.

2018 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 20162018 calendar year operations. Rates reflecting the adjustments included in the formula rate plan evaluation report were implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund. In September 2017 the LPSC issued its report indicating that no changes to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report were required but reserved for several issues, including Entergy Louisiana’s September 2017 update to its formula rate plan evaluation report.  In JulyThe 2018 Entergy Louisiana and the LPSC staff filed an unopposed joint report setting forth a correction to the annualization calculation, the effect of which was a net $3.5 million revenue requirement reduction, and indicating that there are no outstanding issues with the 2016 formula rate plan report, the supplemental report, or the interim updates.  In September 2018 the LPSC approved the unopposed joint report.

Formula Rate Plan Extension Request

In August 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed a request with the LPSC seeking to extend its formula rate plan for three years (2017-2019) with limited modifications of its terms.  Those modifications include: a one-time resetting of base rates to the midpoint of the band at Entergy Louisiana’s authorized return on equity of 9.95% for the 2017 test year; narrowing of the formula rate plan bandwidth from a total of 160 basis points to 80 basis points; and a forward-looking mechanism that would allow Entergy Louisiana to recover certain transmission-related costs contemporaneously with when those projects begin delivering benefits to customers.  Several parties intervened in the proceeding and all parties participated in settlement discussions. In April 2018 the LPSC approved an unopposed joint motion filed by Entergy Louisiana and the LPSC staff that settles the matter. The settlement extends the formula rate plan for three years, providing for rates through at least August 2021. In addition to retaining the major features of the traditional formula rate plan, substantive features of the extended formula rate plan include:

36

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


a mid-point reset of formula rate plan revenues to a 9.95% earned return on common equity for the 2017 test year and for the St. Charles Power Station when it enters commercial operation;
a 9.8% target earned return on common equity for the 2018 and 2019 test years;
narrowing of the common equity bandwidth to plus or minus 60 basis points around the target earned return on common equity;
a cap on potential revenue increase of $35 million for the 2018 evaluation period, and $70 million for the cumulative 2018 and 2019 evaluation periods, on formula rate plan cost of service rate increases (the cap excludes rate changes associated with the transmission recovery mechanism described below and rate changes associated with additional capacity);
a framework for the flow back of certain tax benefits created by the Tax Act to customers, as described in “Regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” above; and
a transmission recovery mechanism providing for the opportunity to recover certain transmission-related expenditures in excess of $100 million annually for projects placed in service up to one month prior to rate change outside of sharing that is designed to operate in a manner similar to the additional capacity mechanism.

2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In June 2018, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2017 calendar year operations. As stated above under “Formula Rate Plan Extension Request,” for the 2017 test year there will be a mid-point reset of formula rate plan revenues to a 9.95% earned return on common equity for the 2017 test year. As such, base rider formula rate plan revenue is to be adjusted prospectively to increase or decrease the earned return on equity fully to the approved cost of equity of 9.95%. The 2017 test year evaluation report produced an earned return on common equity of 8.16%, due in large part10.61% leading to revenue-neutral realignments to other recovery mechanisms. Without these realignments, the evaluation report produces an earned return on equity of 9.88% and a resulting base rider formula rate plan revenue increasedecrease of $4.8$8.9 million. ExcludingWhile base rider formula rate plan revenue decreased as a result of this filing, overall formula rate plan revenues increased by approximately $118.7 million. This outcome is primarily driven by a reduction to the Tax Act credits provided for bypreviously flowed through the tax reform adjustment mechanisms, total formula rate plan revenues will furthermechanism and an increase by a total of $98 million as a result of the evaluation report due to adjustments to the additional capacity and MISO cost recovery mechanisms of the formula rate plan, and implementation of the transmission recovery mechanism. In August 2018, Entergy Louisiana filed a supplemental formula rate plan evaluation report to reflect changes from the 2016 test year formula rate plan proceedings, a decrease toin the transmission recovery mechanism, partially offset by reductions in the additional capacity mechanism revenue requirements and extraordinary cost items. The filing is subject to reflect lower actual capital additions, and a decrease to evaluation period expenses to reflectreview by the terms of a new power sales agreement. Based on the August 2018 update, Entergy Louisiana would recognize a total decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately $17.6 million. Results of the updated 2017 evaluation report filingLPSC. Resulting rates were implemented with thein September 2018 billing month2019, subject to refund and review by the LPSC staff and intervenors. In accordance with the terms of the formula rate plan, in September 2018 the LPSC staff and intervenors submitted their responsesdue to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report and supplemental compliance updates. The LPSC staff asserted objections/reservations regarding 1) Entergy Louisiana’s proposed rate adjustments associated with the return of excess accumulated deferred income taxes pursuant to the Tax Act and the treatment of accumulated deferred income taxes related to reductions of rate base; 2) Entergy Louisiana’s reservation regarding treatment of a regulatory asset related to certain special orders by the LPSC; and 3) test year expenses billed from Entergy Services to Entergy Louisiana. Intervenors also objected to Entergy Louisiana’s treatment of the regulatory asset related to certain special orders by the LPSC. A procedural schedule has not yet been established to resolve thesecontested issues.


Entergy Louisiana also included in its filing a presentation of an initial proposal to combine the legacy Entergy Louisiana and legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana residential rates, which combination, if approved, would be accomplished on a revenue-neutral basis intended not to affect the rates of other customer classes. Entergy Louisiana contemplates that any combination of residential rates resulting from this request would be implemented with the results of the 2019 test year formula rate plan filing.



Several parties intervened in the proceeding and the LPSC staff filed its report of objections/reservations in accordance with the applicable provisions of the formula rate plan. In its report the LPSC staff re-urged reservations with respect to the outstanding issues from the 2017 test year formula rate plan filing and disputed the inclusion of certain affiliate costs for test years 2017 and 2018. The LPSC staff objected to Entergy Louisiana’s proposal to combine residential rates but proposed the setting of a status conference to establish a procedural schedule to more fully address the issue. The LPSC staff also reserved its right to object to the treatment of the sale of Willow Glen reflected in the evaluation report and to the August 2019 compliance update, which was made primarily to update the capital additions reflected in the formula rate plan’s transmission recovery mechanism, based on limited time to review it. Additionally, since the completion of certain transmission projects, the LPSC staff has issued supplemental data requests addressing the prudence of Entergy Louisiana’s expenditures in connection with those projects. Entergy Louisiana is in the process of responding to those requests.

Investigation of Costs Billed by Entergy Services

In November 2018 the LPSC issued a notice of proceeding initiating an investigation into costs incurred by Entergy Services that are included in the retail rates of Entergy Louisiana. As noted in the notice of proceeding, the LPSC observed an increase in capital construction-related costs that have been incurred by Entergy Services. Discovery is ongoing and has included efforts to seek highly detailed information on a broad range of matters unrelated to the scope of the audit.


3735

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Union Power Station and Deactivation or Retirement Decisions for Entergy Louisiana PlantsRetail Rates - Gas


2018 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, as a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1.  Inin January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three-year term permitted by MISO.  In March 2018 the LPSC adopted the ALJ’s recommended order finding that Entergy Louisiana did not demonstrate that its decision to permanently surrender transmission rights for the mothballed (not retired) Willow Glen 2 and 4 units was reasonable and that Entergy Louisiana should hold customers harmless from increased transmission expenses should those units be reactivated. Because no party or the LPSC suggested that Willow Glen 2 and 4 should be reactivated and because the cost to return those units to service far exceeds the revenue the units were expected to generate in MISO, Entergy Louisiana retired Willow Glen 2 and 4 in March 2018. Entergy Louisiana submitted a compliance filing regarding retirement of Willow Glen 2 and 4, and the LPSC closed the proceeding.

Retail Rates - Gas

2017 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

In January 2018,2019, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2017.  The filing of the evaluation report for the test year 2017 reflected an earned return on common equity of 9.06%.  This earned return is below the earnings sharing band of the rate stabilization plan and results in a rate increase of $0.1 million.  Due to the enactment of the Tax Act in late-December 2017,2018. Entergy Louisiana did not have adequate time to reflect the effects of this tax legislationmade a compliance filing in the rate stabilization plan.  In April 2018 Entergy Louisiana filed a supplemental evaluation report for the test year ended September 2017, reflecting the effects of the Tax Act, including a proposal to use the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to offset storm restoration deferred operation2019 and maintenance costs incurred by Entergy Louisiana in connection with the August 2016 flooding disaster in its gas service area. The supplemental filing reflects an earned return on common equity of 10.79%. As-filed rates from the supplemental filing were implemented subject to refund, with customers receiving a cost reduction of approximately $0.7 million effective with bills rendered on and afterduring the first billing cycle of May 2018, as well as a $0.2 million reduction in2019, subject to refund and final LPSC review.

Gas Rate Stabilization Plan Extension Request

In August 2019, Entergy Louisiana submitted an application to the LPSC seeking extension of the gas infrastructure rider effective with bills rendered on and afterrate stabilization plan for the first billing cycle of July 2018.2019-2021 test years. The proceeding is currently in its discovery phase. ALPSC has established a procedural schedule has not been established.to address this request with a hearing scheduled in May 2020.


Filings with the MPSC (Entergy Mississippi)


Formula Rate Plan


In March 2018,2019, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 20182019 test year filing and 20172018 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return for the historical 20172018 calendar year to be above the formula rate plan bandwidth and projected earned return for the 20182019 calendar year in large part asto be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2019 test year filing shows a result$36.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s earned return on common equity to the specified point of the lower federal corporate income taxadjustment of 6.94% return on rate effective in 2018, to bebase, within the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2018 look-back filing compares actual 2018 results to the approved benchmark return on rate base and shows a $10.1 million interim decrease in formula rate plan revenues is necessary. In the fourth quarter 2018, Entergy Mississippi recorded a provision of $9.3 million that reflected the estimate of the difference between the 2018 expected earned rate of return on rate base and an established performance-adjusted benchmark rate of return under the formula rate plan performance-adjusted bandwidth resultingmechanism. In the first quarter 2019, Entergy Mississippi recorded an increase of $0.8 million in no changethe provision to reflect the amount shown in rates.the look-back filing. In June 2018,2019, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a joint stipulation that confirmed that the 2019 test year filing showed that a $32.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for bothreturn on common equity to the 2017 look-back filing and 2018 test year werespecified point of adjustment of 6.93% return on rate base, within the respective formula rate plan bandwidths.bandwidth. Additionally, pursuant to the joint stipulation, Entergy Mississippi’s 2018 look-back filing reflected an earned return on rate base of 7.81% in calendar year 2018 which is above the look-back benchmark return on rate base of 7.13%, resulting in an $11 million decrease in formula rate plan revenues on an interim basis through June 2020. In the second quarter 2019, Entergy Mississippi recorded an additional $0.9 million increase in the provision to reflect the $11 million shown in the look-back filing. In June 20182019 the MPSC approved the joint stipulation which resulted in no change in rates. with rates effective for the first billing cycle of July 2019.

Filings with the City Council (Entergy New Orleans)

Retail Rates

See Regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” aboveForm 10-K for additional discussion regarding the proposed treatment of the effectselectric and gas base rate case filed by Entergy New Orleans in September 2018. The evidentiary hearing in this proceeding was held in June 2019. The record and post-hearing briefs were submitted in July 2019. In August 2019, Entergy New Orleans sent a letter to the City Council proposing a framework for settlement of the rate case.  That framework includes, among other things: (1) a total reduction in revenues of approximately $30 million ($27 million electric, $3 million gas); (2) a reduced return on common equity lower federal corporate income tax rate.than 10.5%, but still commensurate with Entergy New Orleans’s level of risk, paired with three-year electric and gas formula rate plans with forward-looking features; (3) a demand-side management program intended to achieve greater penetration of the City Council’s Energy Smart programs and make progress towards the City Council’s energy efficiency goals. In October 2019 the City Council’s Utility Committee approved a resolution for consideration by



3836

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan includesthe full City Council that included a look-back evaluation report filing in March 2019 that will compare actual 2018 results to the performance-adjusted allowed9.35% return on rate base.  To the extent that Entergy Mississippi expects this look-back evaluation report to show the 2018 earned return on rate base exceeded the formula rate plan performance-adjusted bandwidth, Entergy Mississippi will recordcommon equity, a regulatory provisiontotal reduction in the fourth quarter 2018.

In October 2018, Entergy Mississippi proposed revisions to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism, the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costsrevenues of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the non-fuel annual ownership costsapproximately $39 million ($36 million electric; $3 million gas), and an equity ratio of the Choctaw Generating Station, as well aslesser of 50% or Entergy New Orleans’s actual equity ratio. Also in October 2019, Entergy New Orleans sent another letter to allow similar cost recovery treatment for other future capacity additions approved by the MPSC.

Internal Restructuring

In March 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed an application with the MPSC seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy Mississippi to a new entity, which would ultimately be held by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. Entergy Mississippi proposed in its application to credit retail customers $27 million over six years, beginning in 2019, if the restructuring closed on or before December 1, 2018. In September 2018, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into and filed a joint stipulation regarding the restructuring filing. In September 2018 the MPSC issued an order accepting the stipulation in its entirety and approving the restructuring and credits to retail customers of $27 million over six years, consisting of annual payments of $4.5 million for the years 2019-2024. Entergy Mississippi has also received the required FERC and NRC approvals. Entergy Mississippi expects the restructuring will be consummated on or before December 1, 2018.

It is currently contemplated that Entergy Mississippi would undertake a multi-step restructuring, which would include the following:

Entergy Mississippi would redeem its outstanding preferred stock, at the aggregate redemption price of approximately $21.2 million, including call premiums, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any.
Entergy Mississippi would convert from a Mississippi corporation to a Texas corporation.
Under the Texas Business Organizations Code (TXBOC), Entergy Mississippi will allocate substantially all of its assets to a new subsidiary, Entergy Mississippi Power and Light, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (Entergy Mississippi Power and Light), and Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will assume substantially all of the liabilities of Entergy Mississippi, in a transaction regarded as a merger under the TXBOC. Entergy Mississippi will remain in existence and hold the membership interests in Entergy Mississippi Power and Light.
Entergy Mississippi will contribute the membership interests in Entergy Mississippi Power and Light to an affiliate (Entergy Utility Holding Company, LLC, a Texas limited liability company and subsidiary of Entergy Corporation). As a result of the contribution, Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entergy Utility Holding Company, LLC.
Entergy Mississippi will change its name to Entergy Utility Enterprises, Inc., and Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will then change its name to Entergy Mississippi, LLC.

Upon the completion of the restructuring, Entergy Mississippi, LLC will hold substantially all of the assets, and will have assumed substantially all of the liabilities, of Entergy Mississippi. Entergy Mississippi may modify or supplement the steps to be taken to effectuate the restructuring.


39

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Filings with the City Council (Entergy New Orleans)

Energy Smart Programs

As discussed inidentifying certain issues with the Form 10-K, in September 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a supplemental planproposed resolution and proposed several options for an interim cost recovery mechanism necessary to recover program costs during the period between when existing funds directed to Energy Smart programs were depleted and when new rates from the then-anticipated 2018 combined rate case (subsequently filed in July 2018), which will include a cost recovery mechanism for Energy Smart funding, take effect (estimated to be August 2019). In December 2017inviting the City Council approvedto resume negotiations in an energy efficiency cost recovery rider as an interim funding mechanism for Energy Smart, subjecteffort to verification that no additional funding sources exist. In June 2018 theaddress these issues. The City Council also approved amay consider the resolution recommending that Entergy New Orleans allocate approximately $13.5 million of benefits resulting from the Tax Act to Energy Smart. Entergy New Orleans is seeking approval of a permanent and stable source of funding for Energy Smart as part ofat its base rate case filed in July 2018 and revised in September 2018.November 7, 2019 meeting.

Base Rate Case

In July 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed its 2018 base rate case with the City Council but withdrew it in August 2018.  In September 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed a revised electric and gas base rate case with the City Council. The revised filing requests a 10.5% return on equity for electric operations with opportunity to earn a 10.75% return on equity through a performance adder provision of the electric formula rate plan, and requests a 10.75% return on equity for gas operations. The proposed electric rates in the revised filing reflect a net reduction of $20.3 million. The reduction in electric rates includes a base rate increase of $135.2 million, of which $131.5 million is associated with moving costs currently collected through fuel and riders into base rates, plus a request for an advanced metering surcharge to recover $7.1 million associated with advanced metering infrastructure, offset by a net decrease of $31.1 million related to projected fuel and energy efficiency riders. The filing also includes a proposed gas rate decrease of $142 thousand. Entergy New Orleans’s rates reflect the inclusion of federal income tax reductions due to the Tax Act and the provisions of a previously-approved agreement in principle determining how the benefits of the Tax Act would flow. Entergy New Orleans included cost of service studies for electric and gas operations for the twelve months ending December 31, 2017 and the projected twelve months ending December 31, 2018. In addition, Entergy New Orleans included capital additions expected to be placed into service for the period through December 31, 2019. Entergy New Orleans’s request for a change in rates is based on the projected twelve months ending December 31, 2018.

The filing’s major provisions include: (1) a new electric rate structure, which realigns the revenue requirement associated with capacity and long-term service agreement expense from certain existing riders to base revenue, provides for the recovery of the cost of advanced metering infrastructure, and partially blends rates for Entergy New Orleans’s customers residing in Algiers with customers residing in the remainder of Orleans Parish through a three-year phase-in; (2) contemporaneous cost recovery riders for investments in energy efficiency/demand response, incremental changes in capacity/long-term service agreement costs, grid modernization investment, and gas infrastructure replacement investment; and (3) formula rate plans for both electric and gas operations. The procedural schedule calls for an evidentiary hearing to be held in June 2019.


Filings with the PUCT (Entergy Texas)


2018 Base Rate Case


InIn January 2019, Entergy Texas filed for recovery of rate case expenses totaling $7.2 million. The amounts requested primarily include internal and external expenses related to litigating the 2018 base rate case. Parties filed testimony in April 2019 recommending a disallowance ranging from $3.2 million to $4.2 million of the $7.2 million requested. In May 2019, Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony responding to the parties’ positions. In September 2019 an order was issued abating the procedural schedule and scheduled hearing to allow the finalization of a settlement in principle reached among the parties. The settlement provides for a black box disallowance of $1.4 million. In the third quarter 2019, Entergy Texas recorded a provision for the 2018 base rate case expenses based on the settlement in principle. In October 2019 the settlement was filed for review by the PUCT.

Other Filings

In March 2019, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to set a new distribution cost recovery factor (DCRF) rider. The proposed new DCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $3.2 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in distribution between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. In September 2019 the PUCT issued an order approving rates, which had been effective on an interim basis since June 2019, at the level proposed in Entergy Texas’s application.

In December 2018, Entergy Texas filed a base rate case with the PUCT seeking an increasea request to set a new transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) rider. The proposed new TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $2.7 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in base ratestransmission between January 1, 2018 and rider rates of approximately $166 million, ofSeptember 30, 2018. In April 2019 parties filed testimony proposing a load growth adjustment, which $48 million is associated with moving costs currently being collected through riders into base rates such that the total incremental revenue requirement increase is approximately $118 million.would have fully offset Entergy Texas’s proposed rates and revenues reflectTCRF revenue requirement. In July 2019 the inclusionPUCT granted Entergy Texas’s application as filed to begin recovery of federal income tax reductions duethe requested $2.7 million annual revenue requirement, rejecting opposing parties’ proposed adjustment; however, the PUCT found that the question of prudence of the actual investment costs should be determined in Entergy Texas’s next rate case similar to the Tax Act as well as a rider designed to return unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes over a period of two years following PUCT approval. The base rate case is based on a 12-month test year ending December 31, 2017.

40

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In addition, Entergy Texas included capital additions placed into serviceprocedure used for the period of April 1, 2013costs recovered through December 31, 2017, as well as a post-test year adjustment to include capital additions placed in service by June 30, 2018.the DCRF rider. In October 20182019 the parties filedPUCT issued an unopposed settlement resolving all issues in the proceeding, supporting testimony, a proposed order approving the settlement, andon a motion for interim rates effectiverehearing, clarifying and affirming its prior order granting Entergy Texas’s application as filed. Also in October 2019 a second motion for usage onrehearing was filed, and after October 17, 2018. The unopposed settlement reflects the following terms: a base rate increase of $53.2 million (net of costs realigned from riders), a $25 million refund to reflect the lower federal income tax rate applicable to Entergy Texas from January 25, 2018 throughfiled a response in opposition to the date new rates are implemented, $6 million of capitalized skylining tree hazard costs will not be recovered from customers, $242.5 million of protected excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which includesmotion. The second motion for rehearing is pending before the PUCT.

In August 2019, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a tax gross-up, will be returnedrequest to customers through base rates under the average rate assumption method over the lives of the associated assets, and $185.2 million of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which includes a tax gross-up, will be returned to customers through aamend its TCRF rider. The unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxesproposed new TCRF rider will include carrying chargesis designed to collect approximately $19.4 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in transmission between January 1, 2018 and will beJune 30, 2019, which is $16.7 million in effect over a period of 12 months for large industrial customers and over a period of four years for other customers. The settlement, ifincremental annual revenue above the $2.7 million approved by the PUCT, would provide final resolution of all issues in the matter, including those related to the Tax Act. In October 2018 the ALJ granted the unopposed motion for interim rates to be effective for service rendered on or after October 17, 2018.prior pending TCRF proceeding. The unopposed settlementproceeding is pending consideration by the PUCT.currently pending.


Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filings

Entergy Mississippi

See the Form 10-K for discussion of the MPSC order finding that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interest and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity. In June 2018, as part of the order approving the joint stipulation between the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi addressing Entergy Mississippi’s 2018 formula rate plan evaluation report and the ratemaking effects of the Tax Act, the MPSC approved the acceleration of the recovery of substantially all of Entergy Mississippi’s existing customer meters in anticipation of AMI deployment.

Entergy New Orleans

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2018 the City Council approved Entergy New Orleans’s application seeking a finding that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest.  Deployment of the information technology infrastructure began in 2017 and deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in fourth quarter 2018. In April 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution directing Entergy New Orleans to explore the options for accelerating the deployment of AMI. In June 2018 the City Council approved a one year acceleration of AMI in its service area for an incremental $4.4 million, bringing the total capital spending related to AMI for Entergy New Orleans to $79.4 million.

System Agreement Cost Equalization Proceedings


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2017 the D.C. Circuit issued a decision denying the LPSC’s appeal of the FERC’s October 2011 and February 2014 orders, but also granting the request by all parties to the appeal for remand and agency reconsideration on the issue of whether the operating companies should be required to issue refunds for the 20-month period from September 2001 to May 2003.  The matter was remanded back to the FERC and, in March 2018, the LPSC filed its brief arguing that the FERC should require the Utility operating companies to issue refunds for the 20-month refund period from September 2001 to May 2003.   In May 2018, Entergy filed its brief arguing that the FERC should not require the Utility operating companies to issue refunds for the 20-month refund period from September 2001 to May 2003.

Also as discussed in the Form 10-K, the hearing on the bandwidth calculation for the seven months June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 occurred in July 2016. The presiding judge issued an initial decision in November 2016. In the initial decision, the presiding judge agreed with the Utility operating companies’ position that: (1) interest on the bandwidth payments for the 2005 test period should be accrued from June 1, 2006 until the date that the bandwidth payments for that calculation are paid, which is consistent with how the Utility operating companies performed the

37

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

calculation; and (2) a portion of Entergy Louisiana’s 2001-vintage Louisiana state net operating loss accumulated deferred income tax that results from the Vidalia tax deduction should be excluded from the 2005 test period bandwidth calculation. Various participants filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions related to the initial decision, including the LPSC, the APSC, the FERC trial staff, and Entergy Services. In May 2018 the FERC issued an order affirming the initial decision and ordered a comprehensive recalculation

41

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

of the bandwidth payments/receipts for the seven months June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 and a recalculation of the 2006 and 2007 test years as a result of limited revisions. Entergy filed the comprehensive recalculation of the bandwidth payments/receipts for the seven months June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 and the 2006 and 2007 test years in July 2018. The filing shows the additional following payments and receipts among the Utility operating companies:

 Payments (Receipts)
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas($4)
Entergy Louisiana($23)
Entergy Mississippi$16
Entergy New Orleans$5
Entergy Texas$6



These payments were made in July 2018. In January 2019 the FERC denied the LPSC’s request for rehearing of the May 2018 order. In May 2019 the FERC accepted the July 2018 compliance filing, and the LPSC sought rehearing of that decision in June 2019.


Rough Production Cost Equalization Rates


Consolidated 2011, 2012, 2013, and 20142010 Rate Filing ProceedingsBased on Calendar Year 2009 Production Costs


As discussedIn May 2010, Entergy filed with the FERC the 2010 rates in accordance with the FERC’s orders in the Form 10-K,System Agreement proceeding, and supplemented the filing in September 2010.  Several parties intervened in the proceeding at the FERC, including the LPSC and the City Council, which also filed protests.  In July 2010 the FERC accepted Entergy’s proposed rates for filing, effective June 1, 2010, subject to refund.  After an abeyance of the proceeding schedule, a hearing was held in March 2014 and in December 2014 the FERC consolidated the 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures. In May 2015 Entergy filed direct testimony in the consolidated rate filings and the LPSC filed direct testimony concerning its complaint proceeding that is consolidated with the rate filings, challenging certain components of the pending bandwidth calculations for prior years. Hearings occurred in November 2015, and the ALJ issued an initial decision in July 2016. In the initial decision, the ALJ generally agreed with Entergy’s bandwidth calculations with one exception on the accounting related to the Waterford 3 sale/leaseback. In March 2018 the FERC issued an order. Among other things, the December 2015 order affirming the initial decision.directed Entergy to submit a compliance filing. In April 2018January 2016 the LPSC, requestedthe APSC, and Entergy filed requests for rehearing of the FERC’s March 2018 order affirmingDecember 2015 order. In February 2016, Entergy submitted the ALJ’s initial decision. Entergy filedcompliance filing ordered in May 2018 the bandwidthDecember 2015 order.  The result of the true-up payments and receipts for the 2011-2014 rate filings (table does not net to zero due to rounding):recalculation of production costs resulted in the following payments/receipts among the Utility operating companies:

 Payments (Receipts)
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas$32
Entergy Louisiana$36
Entergy Mississippi($1)4)
Entergy New Orleans$1($1)
Entergy Texas($5)3)


These payments were
In September 2016 the FERC accepted the February 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in May 2018.

Utility Operating Company TerminationNovember 2016. The further compliance filing was required as a result of System Agreement Participation

As discussedan order issued in September 2016 ruling on the Form 10-K, Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi ceased participating in the System Agreement effective December 18, 2013 and November 7, 2015, respectively. Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas terminated participation in the System Agreement on August 31,January 2016 which resulted in the termination of the System Agreement in its entirety pursuant to a settlement agreement approvedrehearing requests filed by the LPSC, the APSC, and Entergy. In the order addressing the rehearing requests, the FERC in December 2015.granted the LPSC’s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the


4238

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



payment/receipt amounts. The FERC also granted the APSC’s and Entergy’s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation. In December 2013November 2016, Entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the FERC set one issue for hearing involving whether and how the benefits associated with settlement with Union Pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues should be allocated among Entergy Arkansas and the other Utility operating companies post-terminationFERC’s order on rehearing. The compliance filing included a revised calculation of the System Agreement. In December 2014 a FERC ALJ issued an initial decision finding that Entergy Arkansas would realize benefits after December 18, 2013 frombandwidth true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations. The LPSC protested the 2008 settlement agreement between Entergy Services, Entergy Arkansas, and Union Pacific, related to certain coal delivery issues. In March 2016 the FERC issued an opinion affirming the December 2014 initial decision with regard to the determination that there were benefits related to the Union Pacific settlement, which were realized post-Entergy Arkansas’s December 2013 withdrawal from the System Agreement, that should be shared with the other Utility operating companies utilizing the methodology proposed by the MPSC and trued-up to actual coal volumes purchased. In May 2016, Entergy made a compliance filing that provided the calculation of Union Pacific settlement benefits utilizing the methodology adopted by the initial decision, trued-up for the actual volumes of coal purchased. The payments were made in May 2016. In August 2016interest calculations. In November 2017 the FERC issued an order accepting Entergy’srejecting the November 2016 compliance filing. AlsoThe FERC determined that the payments detailed in Augustthe November 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the APSC filed a petition for reviewpayments from Entergy Arkansas to Entergy Louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the FERC’s March 2016payment that was made in February 2016. In December 2017, Entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the November 2017 order. As a result of the recalculations, Entergy Arkansas owed very minor payments to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and August 2016 orders with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.Entergy New Orleans. In June 20182019 the D.C. Circuit denied the APSC’s petition.

Interruptible Load Proceedings

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the interruptible load proceedings. As discussed in the Form 10-K, the LPSC appealed the April and September 2016 orders to the D.C. Circuit. In March 2018 the D.C. CircuitFERC issued an order denying the LPSC’s appeal and affirmingrehearing request of FERC’s September 2016 order. The LPSC rehearing request asked the FERC’sFERC to reverse its decision that it wouldboth securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes should be inequitable to award refunds inremoved from the proceeding. In April 2018 the LPSC sought rehearing en banc of the D.C. Circuit’s order denying the LPSC’s appeal. In May 2018 the D.C. Circuit denied the LPSC’s rehearing request. In August 2018 the LPSC filed with the Supreme Court of the United States a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the D.C. Circuit.bandwidth calculation.


Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceeding


SeeAs discussed in the Form 10-K, for discussion of thein December 2018, Entergy Arkansas opportunity sales proceeding filed with the FERC. In October 2018 the FERC issued an order addressing the ALJ’s July 2017 initial decision. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision to cap the reduction in Entergy Arkansas’s payment to account for the increased bandwidth payments that Entergy Arkansas made to the other operating companies. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that Grand Gulf sales from January through September 2000 should be included in the calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payment. The FERC affirmed on other grounds the ALJ’s rejection of the LPSC’s claim that certain joint account sales should be accounted for as part of the calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payment. The FERC directed Entergy to make a compliance filing by December 17,in response to the FERC’s October 2018 providingorder in the opportunity sales proceeding. The compliance filing provided a final calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payments to the other Utility operating companies, pursuantincluding interest. No protests were filed in response to the findings in the order and explaining how Entergy Arkansas will pay refunds, including the timeline for making those refunds. The FERC’s decision effectively establishes the base amount Entergy Arkansas must pay to the other Utility operating companies for the period of 2000-2009 to be approximately $68 million. Entergy Arkansas will also pay interest on the base amount to the other Utility operating companies, currently estimated to be approximately $64 million as of September 30,December 2018 for an estimated total of $132 million. This amount is consistent with the liability previously recognized by Entergy Arkansas.compliance filing. The December 2018 compliance filing will includeis pending FERC action.

In February 2019 the recipientsLPSC filed a new complaint relating to two issues that were raised in the opportunity sales proceeding, but that, in its October 2018 order, the FERC held were outside the scope of the proceeding. In March 2019, Entergy Services filed an answer and final amount of payments owed bymotion to dismiss the new complaint.

In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas as well asfiled an application and supporting testimony with the timingAPSC requesting approval of the payments. Because management currently expectsa special rider tariff to recover the costs of these payments from its retail portioncustomers over a 24-month period.  The application requested that the APSC approve the rider to take effect within 30 days or, if suspended by the APSC as allowed by commission rule, approve the rider to take effect in the first billing cycle of the payments duefirst month occurring 30 days after issuance of the APSC’s order approving the rider. In June 2019 the APSC suspended Entergy Arkansas’s tariff and granted Entergy Arkansas’s motion asking the APSC to establish the proceeding as a resultthe single designated proceeding in which interested parties may assert claims related to the appropriate retail rate treatment of this proceeding, Entergy Arkansas previously recognized a regulatory asset with a balance of $114 million as of September 30, 2018.the FERC’s October 2018 order and related FERC orders in the opportunity sales proceeding.


Complaints Against System Energy


Return on Equity and Capital Structure Complaints


As discussed inSee the Form 10-K in January 2017for a discussion of the return on equity complaints filed by the APSC and the MPSC filed a complaint withand by the FERCLPSC against System Energy. The LPSC’s complaint seeksalso includes a reduction in the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement

43

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Noteschallenge to Financial Statements

pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equity under the Unit Power Sales Agreement is 10.94%, which was established in a rate proceeding that became final in July 2001.

The APSC and MPSC complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requests the FERC to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests that the FERC establish January 23, 2017 as a refund effective date. The complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for System Energy is between 8.37% and 8.67%. System Energy answered the complaint in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. The LPSC and the City Council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. In September 2017 the FERC established a refund effective date of January 23, 2017, consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in Unit Power Sales Agreement below, and directed the parties to engage in settlement proceedings before an ALJ. The parties have been unable to settle the return on equity issue and a FERC hearing judge was assigned in July 2018. The 15-month refund effective date in connection with the APSC/MPSC complaint expired on April 23, 2018.

In April 2018 the LPSC filed a complaint with the FERC against System Energy seeking an additional fifteen-month refund period.  The LPSC complaint requests similar relief from the FERC with respect to System Energy’s return on equity and also requests the FERC to investigate System Energy’s capital structure. The APSC, MPSC, and City Council intervened in the proceeding, filed an answer expressing support for the complaint, and asked the FERC to consolidate this proceeding with the proceeding initiated by the complaint of the APSC and MPSC in January 2017. System Energy answered the LPSC complaint in May 2018 and also filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In July 2018 the LPSC answered System Energy’s motion to dismiss.

In August 2018 the FERC issued an order dismissing the LPSC’s request to investigate System Energy’s capital structure and setting for hearing System Energy’sthe return on equity complaint, with a refund effective date of April 27, 2018. The portion of the LPSC’s complaint dealing with return on equity was subsequently consolidated with the APSC and MPSC complaint for hearing. The consolidated hearing was scheduled for June 2019, but the procedural schedule is currently being held in abeyance. An ALJ ordered the abeyance after the FERC,parties are required to address an order (issued in a separate proceeding on the return on equity forinvolving New England transmission owners, issued an orderowners) that proposed modifying itsthe FERC’s standard methodology for determining return on equity. In September 2018, System Energy filed a request for rehearing and the LPSC filed a request for rehearing or reconsideration of the FERC’s August 2018 order. The LPSC’s request referenced an amended complaint that it filed on the same day raising the same capital structure claim the FERC had earlier dismissed. The FERC docketedinitiated a new proceeding for the amended capital structure complaint, in a new proceeding, and System Energy submitted a response in October 2018. In January 2019 the FERC set the amended capital structure complaint for settlement and hearing proceedings. Settlement procedures in the capital structure proceeding commenced in February 2019. As noted below, in June 2019

39

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

settlement discussions were terminated and the amended capital structure complaint was consolidated with the ongoing return on equity proceeding.

In January 2019 the LPSC and the APSC and MPSC filed direct testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the refund period January 23, 2017 through April 23, 2018, the LPSC argues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.81% and the APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.24%. For the refund period April 27, 2018 through July 27, 2019, and for application on a prospective basis, the LPSC argues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.97% and the APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.41%. In March 2019, System Energy submitted answering testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, System Energy’s testimony argues for a return on equity of 10.10% (median) or 10.70% (midpoint). For the second refund period, System Energy’s testimony shows that the calculated returns on equity for the first period fall within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity, and thus the second complaint should be dismissed (and the first period return on equity used going forward). If the FERC nonetheless were to set a new return on equity for the second period (and going forward), System Energy argues the return on equity should be either 10.32% (median) or 10.69% (midpoint).

In May 2019 the FERC trial staff filed its direct and answering testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, the FERC trial staff calculates an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 9.89% based on the application of FERC’s proposed methodology. The FERC trial staff’s direct and answering testimony noted that an authorized return on equity of 9.89% for the first refund period was within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity for the second refund period, as calculated using a study period ending January 31, 2019 for the second refund period.

In June 2019, System Entergy filed testimony responding to the testimony filed by the FERC trial staff. Among other things, System Energy’s testimony rebutted arguments raised by the FERC trial staff and provided updated calculations for the second refund period based on the study period ending May 31, 2019. For that refund period, System Energy’s testimony shows that strict application of the return on equity methodology proposed by the FERC trial staff indicates that the second complaint would not be dismissed, and the new return on equity would be set at 9.65% (median) or 9.74% (midpoint). System Energy’s testimony argues that these results are insufficient in light of benchmarks such as state returns on equity and treasury bond yields, and instead proposes that the calculated returns on equity for the second period should be either 9.91% (median) or 10.3% (midpoint). System Energy’s testimony also argues that, under application of its proposed modified methodology, the 10.10% return on equity calculated for the first refund period would fall within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity for the second refund period. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding.

Also in June 2019, the FERC’s Chief ALJ issued an order terminating settlement discussions in the amended complaint addressing System Energy’s capital structure. The ALJ consolidated the amended complaint with the ongoing return on equity proceeding and set new procedural deadlines for the consolidated hearing, such that the hearing will commence in January 2020 and the initial decision will be due in June 2020.

In August 2019 the LPSC and the APSC and MPSC filed rebuttal testimony in the return on equity proceeding and direct and answering testimony relating to System Energy’s capital structure. The LPSC reargues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.81% for the first refund period and 7.97% for the second refund period. The APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.26% for the first refund period and 8.32% for the second refund period. With respect to capital structure, the LPSC proposes that the FERC establish a hypothetical capital structure for System Energy for ratemaking purposes. Specifically, the LPSC proposes that System Energy’s common equity ratio be set to Entergy Corporation’s equity ratio of 37% equity and 63% debt. In the alternative, the LPSC argues that the equity ratio should be no higher than 49%, the composite equity ratio of System Energy and the other Entergy operating companies who purchase under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The APSC and MPSC recommend that 35.98% be set as the common equity ratio for System Energy. As an alternative, the APSC and MPSC propose that System Energy’s common equity be set at 46.75% based on the median equity ratio of the proxy group for setting the return on equity.

40

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


In September 2019 the FERC trial staff filed its rebuttal testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, the FERC trial staff calculates an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 9.40% based on the application of the FERC’s proposed methodology and an updated proxy group. For the second refund period, based on the study period ending May 31, 2019, the FERC trial staff rebuttal testimony argues for a return on equity of 9.63%. In September 2019 the FERC trial staff also filed direct and answering testimony relating to System Energy’s capital structure. The FERC trial staff argues that the average capital structure of the proxy group used to develop System Energy’s return on equity should be used to establish the capital structure. Using this approach, the FERC trial staff calculates the average capital structure for its proposed proxy group of 46.74% common equity, and 53.26% debt.
In October 2018.2019, System Energy filed answering testimony disputing the FERC trial staff’s, the LPSC’s, and the APSC’s and MPSC’s arguments for the use of a hypothetical capital structure and arguing that the use of System Energy’s actual capital structure is just and reasonable.


Grand Gulf Sale-leaseback Renewal Complaint


InAs discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2018 the LPSC filed a complaint against System Energy and Entergy Services related to System Energy’s renewal in 2015 of a sale-leaseback transaction originally entered into in December 1988 for an 11.5% undivided interest in Grand Gulf Unit 1. The complaint alleges

In February 2019 the presiding ALJ ruled that System Energy violated the filed rate andhearing ordered by the FERC’s ratemaking and accounting requirements when itFERC includes the issue of whether specific subcategories of accumulated deferred income tax should be included in, Unit Power Sales Agreement billingsor excluded from, System Energy’s formula rate. In March 2019 the LPSC, MPSC, APSC, and City Council filed direct testimony. The LPSC testimony seeks refunds that include the renewal lease payments (approximately $17.2 million per year since July 2015), rate base reductions for accumulated deferred income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions (claimed to be approximately $334.5 million as of December 2018), and the cost of capital additions associated with the sale-leaseback interest (claimed to be approximately $274.8 million), as well as interest on those amounts. The direct testimony of the City Council and thatthe APSC and MPSC address various issues raised by the LPSC. System Energy is double-recoveringdisputes that any refunds are owed for billings under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. A hearing has been scheduled for November 2019.

In June 2019 System Energy filed answering testimony in the sale-leaseback complaint proceeding arguing that the FERC should reject all claims for refunds.  Among other things, System Energy argued that claims for refunds of the costs by including both theof lease renewal payments and the capital additions inshould be rejected because those costs were recovered consistent with the Unit Power Sales Agreement billings.formula rate, System Energy was not over or double recovering any costs, and customers will save approximately $850 million over initial and renewal terms of the leases.  System Energy argued that claims for refunds associated with liabilities arising from uncertain tax positions should be rejected because the liabilities do not provide cost-free capital, the repayment timing of the liabilities is uncertain, and the outcome of the underlying tax positions is uncertain.  System Energy’s testimony also challenged the refund calculations supplied by the other parties.

In August 2019 the FERC trial staff filed direct and answering testimony seeking refunds for rate base reductions for liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions (claimed to be up to approximately $602 million plus interest). The complaintFERC trial staff also claimsargued that System Energy was imprudentrecovered $32 million more than it should have in entering into the sale-leaseback renewal because the Utility operating companies that purchase Grand Gulf’s output fromdepreciation expense for capital additions. In September 2019, System Energy could have obtained cheaper capacityfiled cross-answering testimony disputing the FERC trial staff’s arguments for refunds, stating that the FERC trial staff’s position regarding depreciation rates for capital additions is not unreasonable and energyexplaining that any change in depreciation expense is only one element of a Unit Power Sales Agreement rebilling calculation. Adjustments to depreciation expense in any rebilling under the MISO markets.Unit Power Sales Agreement formula rate will also involve changes to accumulated depreciation, accumulated deferred income taxes, and other formula elements as needed. In October 2019 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony increasing the amount of refunds sought for liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions.  The complaint further allegesLPSC now seeks approximately $512 million plus interest.  At the same time, the FERC trial staff filed rebuttal testimony conceding that System Energy violated various other reporting and accounting requirements and should have sought prior FERC approval ofit was no longer seeking up to $602 million related to the lease renewal. The complaint seeks various formsuncertain tax positions; instead, it is seeking approximately $511


4441

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


of relief from the FERC. The complaint seeks refunds for capital addition costs for all years in which they were recorded in allegedly non-formula accounts or, alternatively, the disallowance of the return on equity for the capital additions in those yearsmillion plus interest.  The complaint also asks that the FERC disallow and refund the lease costs of the sale-leaseback renewal on grounds of imprudence, investigate System Energy’s treatment of a DOE litigation payment, and impose certain forward-looking procedural protections, including audit rights for retail regulators of the Unit Power Sales Agreement formula rates. The APSC, MPSC, and City Council have intervened in the proceeding.

In June 2018, System Energy and Entergy Services filed a motion to dismiss and answer to the LPSC complaint denying that System Energy’s treatment of the sale-leaseback renewal and capital additions violated the terms of the filed rate or any other FERC ratemaking, accounting, or legal requirements or otherwise constituted double recovery. The response also argued that the complaint is inconsistent with a FERC-approved settlementadjustments to which the LPSC is a party and that explicitly authorizes System Energy to recover its lease payments. Finally, the response argued that both the capital additions and the sale-leaseback renewal were prudent investments and the LPSC complaint fails to justify any disallowance or refunds. The response asked that the FERC dismiss and reject the LPSC complaint without further action, investigation, or hearing, but also offered to submit formula rate protocols for the Unit Power Sales Agreement similar to the procedures used for reviewing transmission rates under the MISO tariff. In September 2018 the FERC issued an order setting the complaint for hearing and settlement proceedings. The FERC established a refund effective date of May 2018.

Unit Power Sales Agreement

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2017, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula. The proposed amendments would result in lower charges to the Utility operating companies that buy capacity and energy from System Energy under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The FERC accepted the proposed amendments effective October 1, 2017, and established a refund effective date of October 11, 2017 with respect to the rate decrease. In June 2018, System Energy filed with the FERC an uncontested settlement relating to the updated depreciation rates and nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements. In August 2018 the FERC issued an order accepting the settlement. In third quarter 2018, System Energy recordedshould affect rate base on a reduction in depreciation expense of approximately $26 million, representing the cumulative difference in depreciation expense resulting from the depreciation rates used from October 11, 2017 through September 30, 2018 and the depreciation rates included in the settlement filing accepted by the FERC.prospective basis only.


Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators


Entergy Mississippi


As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Mississippi has approval from the MPSC to collect a storm damage provision of $1.75 million per month. If Entergy Mississippi’s accumulated storm damage provision balance exceeds $15 million, the collection of the storm damage provision ceases until such time that the accumulated storm damage provision becomes less than $10 million. As of June 30, 2018,May 31, 2019, Entergy Mississippi’s storm damage provision balance exceeded $15was less than $10 million. Accordingly, Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the monthly storm damage provision was reset to zero beginningeffective with August 2018July 2019 bills.





45

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 3.  EQUITY (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana)Texas)


Common Stock


Earnings per Share


The following table presents Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
For the Three Months Ended September 30,2019 2018
2018 2017(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)Income Shares $/share Income Shares $/share
Basic earnings per shareIncome Shares $/share Income Shares $/share           
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$536.4
 181.0
 
$2.96
 
$398.2
 179.6
 
$2.22

$365.2
 198.9
 
$1.84
 
$536.4
 181.0
 
$2.96
Average dilutive effect of:                      
Stock options  0.4
 (0.01)   0.2
 
  0.7
 (0.01)   0.4
 (0.01)
Other equity plans  0.8
 (0.01)   0.7
 (0.01)  0.9
 (0.01)   0.8
 (0.01)
Equity forwards  1.5
 (0.02)   
 
  
 
   1.5
 (0.02)
Diluted earnings per share
$536.4
 183.7
 
$2.92
 
$398.2
 180.5
 
$2.21

$365.2
 200.5
 
$1.82
 
$536.4
 183.7
 
$2.92


The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately 1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 20182018.

42

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and approximately 2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

 For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2019 2018
 (In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
 Income Shares $/share Income Shares $/share
Basic earnings per share           
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$856.2
 193.9
 
$4.42
 
$914.6
 180.8
 
$5.06
Average dilutive effect of:           
Stock options  0.5
 (0.01)   0.3
 (0.01)
Other equity plans  0.7
 (0.02)   0.7
 (0.01)
Equity forwards  0.6
 (0.01)   0.9
 (0.03)
Diluted earnings per share
$856.2
 195.7
 
$4.38
 
$914.6
 182.7
 
$5.01

 For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2018 2017
 (In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per shareIncome Shares $/share Income Shares $/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$914.6
 180.8
 
$5.06
 
$890.7
 179.5
 
$4.96
Average dilutive effect of:           
Stock options  0.3
 (0.01)   0.2
 (0.01)
Other equity plans  0.7
 (0.01)   0.5
 (0.01)
Equity forwards  0.9
 (0.03)   
 
Diluted earnings per share
$914.6
 182.7
 
$5.01
 
$890.7
 180.2
 
$4.94


The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately 0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and approximately 1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and approximately 3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018.


Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements herein and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.


Dividends declared per common share were $0.91 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and $0.89 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and $0.87 for the three months ended September 30, 2017.2018. Dividends declared per common share were $2.73 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and $2.67 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $2.61 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018.


Equity Forward Sale Agreements


InAs discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in June 2018, Entergy marketed an equity offering of 15.3 million shares of common stock. In lieu of issuing equity at the time of the offering, Entergy entered into forward sale agreements with various investment banks. No

46

Table of Contents
In December 2018, Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

amounts have or will be recorded on Entergy’s balance sheet with respect to the equity offering until settlements of the equity forwards occur. The equity forwards require Entergy to, at its election prior to June 7, 2019, either (i) physically settle the transactions by issuing the total of 15.3 million sharessettled a portion of its common stock to the investment banks in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreements (initially $74.45 per share) or (ii) net settle the transactions in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The forward sale price is subject to adjustment on a daily basis based on a floating interest rate factor and will decrease by other fixed amounts specified in the agreements.

If Entergy elects physical settlement ofobligations under the forward sale agreements it expects to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include repaymentby delivering 6,834,221 shares of commercial paper, outstanding loans under Entergy's revolving credit facility, or other debt.

Until settlement of the equity forwards, earnings per share dilution resulting from the agreements, if any, will be determined under the treasury stock method. Share dilution occurs when the average market price of Entergy’s common stock is higher thanin exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $500 million. In May 2019, Entergy physically settled the average forward sales price. If Entergy had elected to net share settle the forward sale agreements asremaining 8,448,171 shares of September 30, 2018, Entergy would have been required to deliver 1.4 million shares.common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $608 million.


Treasury Stock


During the nine months ended September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy Corporation issued 613,6621,582,916 shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises, vesting of shares of restricted stock, and other stock-based awards.  Entergy Corporation did not repurchase any of its common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.2019.


Retained Earnings


On October 26, 2018,25, 2019, Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.91$0.93 per share, payable on December 3, 2018,2, 2019, to holders of record as of November 8, 2018.7, 2019.


Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-01 “Financial Instruments (Subtopic 825-10)2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” effective January 1, 2018.2019. The ASU requires investments in equity securities, excluding those accounted for undermakes a number of amendments to hedge accounting, most significantly changing the equity method or resulting in consolidationrecognition and presentation of the investee, to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income.highly effective hedges. Entergy implemented this standard using a modified retrospective method, and recorded an adjustment increasing retained earnings and reducingincreasing accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss by $633approximately $8 million as of January 1, 20182019 for the cumulative effect of the unrealized gains and lossesineffectiveness portion of designated hedges on investments in equity securities held by the decommissioning trust funds that do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment. See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of effects of the new standard.nuclear power sales.

Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” effective January 1, 2018. The ASU requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity asset transfers, other than inventory, at the time the transfer occurs.  Entergy implemented this standard using a modified retrospective method, and recorded an adjustment decreasing retained earnings by $56 million as of January 1, 2018 for the cumulative effect of recording deferred tax assets on previously-recognized intra-entity asset transfers.

Entergy adopted ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” in the first quarter 2018. The ASU allows a one-time reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for certain tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that would otherwise be stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income.  Entergy’s policy for releasing income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income for available-for-sale securities is to use the portfolio approach.  Entergy elected to reclassify the $15.5 million


4743

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


of stranded tax effects in
Entergy implemented ASU 2017-08 “Receivables (Topic 310): Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs” effective January 1, 2019. The ASU amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. Entergy implemented this standard using the modified retrospective approach, and recorded an adjustment decreasing retained earnings and decreasing accumulated other comprehensive income resulting fromloss by approximately $1 million as of January 1, 2019 for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to retained earnings ($32 million decrease) or the regulatory liability for income taxes ($16.5 million increase). Entergy’s reclassification only includes thecumulative effect of the change in the federal corporate income tax rate on accumulated other comprehensive income.amended amortization period.


Comprehensive Income


Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy and Entergy Louisiana. The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 2018
($14,874) 
($589,926) 
($8,842) 
($613,642)
Beginning balance, July 1, 2019
$51,736
 
($508,876) 
$26,736
 
($430,404)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(40,401) 
 (7,173) (47,574)(5,190) 
 8,350
 3,160
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)8,397
 15,265
 5,428
 29,090
(14,913) 25,464
 (3,079) 7,472
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(32,004) 15,265
 (1,745) (18,484)(20,103) 25,464
 5,271
 10,632
Ending balance, September 30, 2018
($46,878) 
($574,661) 
($10,587) 
($632,126)
Ending balance, September 30, 2019
$31,633
 
($483,412) 
$32,007
 
($419,772)


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 2017
$23,414
 
($449,898) 
$479,257
 
$52,773
Beginning balance, July 1, 2018
($14,874) 
($589,926) 
($8,842) 
($613,642)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications27,884
 
 35,630
 63,514
(40,401) 
 (7,173) (47,574)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(14,671) 12,297
 (2,235) (4,609)8,397
 15,265
 5,428
 29,090
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period13,213
 12,297
 33,395
 58,905
(32,004) 15,265
 (1,745) (18,484)
Ending balance, September 30, 2017
$36,627
 
($437,601) 
$512,652
 
$111,678
Ending balance, September 30, 2018
($46,878) 
($574,661) 
($10,587) 
($632,126)




4844

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 by component:
 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Ending balance, December 31, 2018
($23,135) 
($531,922) 
($2,116) 
($557,173)
Implementation of accounting standards(7,685) 
 879
 (6,806)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2019
($30,820) 
($531,922) 
($1,237) 
($563,979)
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications122,481
 
 37,724
 160,205
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(60,028) 48,510
 (4,480) (15,998)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period62,453
 48,510
 33,244
 144,207
Ending balance, September 30, 2019
$31,633
 
($483,412) 
$32,007
 
($419,772)


45

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 by component:
 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Ending balance, December 31, 2017
($37,477) 
($531,099) 
$545,045
 
($23,531)
Implementation of accounting standards
 
 (632,617) (632,617)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018
($37,477) 
($531,099) 
($87,572) 
($656,148)
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(31,816) 
 (50,958) (82,774)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)30,171
 47,404
 13,716
 91,291
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(1,645) 47,404
 (37,242) 8,517
        
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-02(7,756) (90,966) 114,227
 15,505
        
Ending balance, September 30, 2018
($46,878) 
($574,661) 
($10,587) 
($632,126)

 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
        
Ending balance, December 31, 2017
($37,477) 
($531,099) 
$545,045
 
($23,531)
Implementation of accounting standards
 
 (632,617) (632,617)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018
($37,477) 
($531,099) 
($87,572) 
($656,148)
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(31,816) 
 (50,958) (82,774)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)30,171
 47,404
 13,716
 91,291
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period(1,645) 47,404
 (37,242) 8,517
        
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-02(7,756) (90,966) 114,227
 15,505
        
Ending balance, September 30, 2018
($46,878) 
($574,661) 
($10,587) 
($632,126)

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 by component:
 
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
 
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
 
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
 
Foreign
currency
translation
 
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
$3,993
 
($469,446) 
$429,734
 
$748
 
($34,971)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications88,550
 
 109,372
 (748) 197,174
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(55,916) 31,845
 (26,454) 
 (50,525)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period32,634
 31,845
 82,918
 (748) 146,649
Ending balance, September 30, 2017
$36,627
 
($437,601) 
$512,652
 
$—
 
$111,678

49

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 
($8,091) 
($57,451)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (969) (500)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (969) (500)
Ending balance, September 30, 
($9,060) 
($57,951)


46

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, July 1, 
($57,451) 
($49,122)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (500) (370)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (500) (370)
     
Ending balance, September 30, 
($57,951) 
($49,492)


The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 
($6,153) 
($46,400)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (2,907) (1,502)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (2,907) (1,502)
     
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-02 
 (10,049)
     
Ending balance, September 30, 
($9,060) 
($57,951)

  Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 
($46,400) 
($48,442)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
 (1,502) (1,050)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period (1,502) (1,050)
     
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-02 (10,049) 
     
Ending balance, September 30, 
($57,951) 
($49,492)



50

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:

Amounts reclassified
from AOCI

Income Statement Location
 2019 2018  

(In Thousands)

Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
  

   Power contracts
$18,925
 
($10,566)
Competitive business operating revenues
   Interest rate swaps(48) (63)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges18,877
 (10,629)


(3,964) 2,232

Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$14,913
 
($8,397)




  

Pension and other postretirement liabilities

  

   Amortization of prior-service credit
$5,325
 
$5,425

(a)
   Amortization of loss(20,919) (24,740)
(a)
   Settlement loss(16,630) (76)
(a)
Total amortization(32,224) (19,391)


6,760
 4,126

Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($25,464) 
($15,265)



  

Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
  

Realized gain (loss)
$4,872
 
($8,589)
Interest and investment income

(1,793) 3,161

Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$3,079
 
($5,428)




  

Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($7,472) 
($29,090)



Amounts reclassified
from AOCI

Income Statement Location
 2018 2017  

(In Thousands)

Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
  

   Power contracts
($10,566) 
$22,756

Competitive business operating revenues
   Interest rate swaps(63) (185)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges(10,629) 22,571



2,232
 (7,900)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
($8,397) 
$14,671





  

Pension and other postretirement liabilities

  

   Amortization of prior-service credit
$5,425
 
$6,565

(a)
   Amortization of loss(24,740) (21,480)
(a)
   Settlement loss(76) (4,200)
(a)
Total amortization(19,391) (19,115)


4,126
 6,818

Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($15,265) 
($12,297)



  

Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
  

Realized gain (loss)
($8,589) 
$4,382

Interest and investment income

3,161
 (2,147)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
($5,428) 
$2,235





  

Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($29,090) 
$4,609




(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


5147

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
2018 2017 2019 2018 
(In Thousands) (In Thousands) 
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)        
Power contracts
($37,913) 
$86,678
 Competitive business operating revenues
$76,129
 
($37,913) Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps(278) (654) Miscellaneous - net(145) (278) Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges(38,191) 86,024
 75,984
 (38,191) 
8,020
 (30,108) Income taxes(15,956) 8,020
 Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
($30,171) 
$55,916
 
$60,028
 
($30,171) 
        
Pension and other postretirement liabilities        
Amortization of prior-service credit
$16,278
 
$19,691
 (a)
$15,977
 
$16,278
 (a)
Amortization of loss(74,503) (64,605) (a)(58,888) (74,503) (a)
Settlement loss(2,098) (5,965) (a)(18,685) (2,098) (a)
Total amortization(60,323) (50,879) (61,596) (60,323) 
12,919
 19,034
 Income taxes13,086
 12,919
 Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($47,404) 
($31,845) 
($48,510) 
($47,404) 
        
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)        
Realized gain (loss)
($21,703) 
$51,871
 Interest and investment income
$7,088
 
($21,703) Interest and investment income
7,987
 (25,417) Income taxes(2,608) 7,987
 Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
($13,716) 
$26,454
 
$4,480
 
($13,716) 
        
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($91,291) 
$50,525
 
$15,998
 
($91,291) 


(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.



5248

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2019 2018  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$1,837
 
$1,934
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (526) (1,257) (a)
Total amortization 1,311
 677
  
  (342) (177) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 969
 500
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$969
 
$500
  

  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2018 2017  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$1,934
 
$1,934
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (1,257) (1,332) (a)
Total amortization 677
 602
  
  (177) (232) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 500
 370
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$500
 
$370
  


(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.


Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) into income for Entergy Louisiana for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2019 2018  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$5,511
 
$5,802
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (1,578) (3,770) (a)
Total amortization 3,933
 2,032
  
  (1,026) (530) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 2,907
 1,502
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$2,907
 
$1,502
  

  Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
 Income Statement Location
  2018 2017  
  (In Thousands)  
Pension and other postretirement liabilities      
   Amortization of prior-service credit 
$5,802
 
$5,802
 (a)
   Amortization of loss (3,770) (3,996) (a)
Total amortization 2,032
 1,806
  
  (530) (756) Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax) 1,502
 1,050
  
       
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax) 
$1,502
 
$1,050
  


(a)These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost.  See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.



Preferred Stock

In September 2019, Entergy Texas issued $35 million of 5.375% Series A preferred stock, a total of 1,400,000 shares with a liquidation value of $25 per share, all of which are outstanding as of September 30, 2019. The dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly. The preferred stock is redeemable on or after October 15, 2024 at Entergy Texas’s option, at a fixed redemption price of $25 per share.

Accounting standards regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities require the classification of preferred securities between liabilities and shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet if the holders of those securities have protective rights that allow them to gain control of the board of directors in certain circumstances. These rights would have the effect of giving the holders the ability to potentially redeem their securities, even if the likelihood of occurrence of these circumstances is considered remote. The outstanding preferred stock of Entergy

49

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Texas has protective rights with respect to unpaid dividends but provides for the election of board members that would not constitute a majority of the board, and the preferred stock of Entergy Texas is therefore classified as a component of equity.

NOTE 4.  REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in September 2023.2024.  The facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $20 million of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility.  The commitment fee is currently 0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount.  Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation.  The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 was 3.46%3.94% on the drawn portion of the facility.  Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of September 30, 2018.

2019.
53
Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $155 $6 $3,339

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Capacity Borrowings 
Letters
of Credit
 
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500 $630 $6 $2,864


Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Entergy is in compliance with this covenant.  If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.


Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $2 billion.  At September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy Corporation had approximately $1,947$1,918 million of commercial paper outstanding.  The weighted-average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 was 2.42%2.88%.


Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of September 30, 20182019 as follows:
Company 
Expiration
Date
 
Amount of
Facility
 Interest Rate (a) 
Amount Drawn
as of
September 30, 20182019
 
Letters of Credit
Outstanding as of
September 30, 20182019
Entergy Arkansas April 20192020 $20 million (b) 3.49%3.17% $— $—
Entergy Arkansas September 20232024 $150 million (c) 3.49%3.17% $— $—
Entergy Louisiana September 20232024 $350 million (c) 3.49%3.17% $— $—
Entergy Mississippi May 20192020 $37.5 million (d) 3.74%3.54% $— $—
Entergy Mississippi May 20192020 $35 million (d) 3.74%3.54% $— $—
Entergy Mississippi May 20192020 $10 million (d) 3.74%3.54% $— $—
Entergy New Orleans November 20182021 $25 million (c) 3.72%3.32% $— $0.8 million
Entergy Texas September 20232024 $150 million (c) 3.74%3.54% $— $1.3 million


(a)For credit facilities with no borrowings as of September 30, 2018, theThe interest rate is the estimated interest rate as of September 30, 20182019 that would have been applied to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Arkansas’s option.

50

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

(c)The credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against a portion of the borrowing capacity of the facility as follows: $5 million for Entergy Arkansas; $15 million for Entergy Louisiana; $10 million for Entergy New Orleans; and $30 million for Entergy Texas.
(d)Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Mississippi’s option.


The commitment fees on the credit facilities range from 0.075% to 0.275%0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount. Each of the credit facilities requires the Registrant Subsidiary borrower to maintain a debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Each Registrant Subsidiary is in compliance with this covenant.


In addition, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each entered into uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. Following is a summary of the uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as of September 30, 2018:2019:

54

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Company 
Amount of
Uncommitted Facility
 Letter of Credit Fee 
Letters of Credit
Issued as of
September 30, 20182019 (a)
Entergy Arkansas $25 million 0.70% $1 million
Entergy Louisiana $125 million 0.70% $2211.7 million
Entergy Mississippi $4065 million 0.70% $11.28.1 million
Entergy New Orleans $15 million 1.00% $2.11 million
Entergy Texas $50 million 0.70% $2026.2 million



(a)As of September 30, 2018,2019, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $1 million for Entergy Arkansas, $0.2 million for Entergy Mississippi, and $3.6 million for Entergy Texas.Mississippi. See Note 8 to the financial statements herein for discussion of financial transmission rights.


The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC.  The current FERC-authorized limits for Entergy New Orleans are effective through October 31, 2019.2021. The current FERC-authorized limits for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Texas, and System Energy are effective through November 8, 2020. In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies may also borrow from the Entergy System money pool and from other internal short-term borrowing arrangements.  The money pool and the other internal borrowing arrangements are inter-company borrowing arrangements designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings.  Borrowings from internal and external short termshort-term borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits.  The following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of September 30, 20182019 (aggregating both internal and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
 Authorized Borrowings
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas$250 $—
Entergy Louisiana$450 $—
Entergy Mississippi$175 $—
Entergy New Orleans$150 $46
Entergy Texas$200 $—
System Energy$200 $—



51

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
 Authorized Borrowings
 (In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas$250 $—
Entergy Louisiana$450 $—
Entergy Mississippi$175 $34
Entergy New Orleans$150 $—
Entergy Texas$200 $—
System Energy$200 $—


Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement Management, LLC Credit Facility

In January 2019, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Credit Facility

was transferred to NorthStar and its credit facility was assumed by Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement Management, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has aYankee’s parent company that remains an Entergy subsidiary after the transfer. The credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation withhas a borrowing capacity of $145$139 million thatand expires in November 2020.  Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against the credit facility. This facility provides working capital to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. The commitment fee is currently 0.20% of the undrawn commitment amount.  As of September 30, 2018, $1322019, $139 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility.  The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 was 3.37%4.07% on the drawn portion of the facility. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 16 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the transfer of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee to NorthStar.


Variable Interest Entities (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)


See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIEs).  To finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel, the nuclear fuel company VIEs have credit facilities and three of the four VIEs also issuedhave commercial paper programs in place. Following is a summary as of September 30, 2018 as follows:

2019:
55
Company 
Expiration
Date
 
Amount
of
Facility
 Weighted Average Interest Rate on Borrowings (a) 
Amount
Outstanding as of
September 30, 2019
  
 (Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE September 2021 $80 3.41% $30.3
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE September 2021 $105 3.37% $84.3
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE September 2021 $105 3.41% $65.5
System Energy VIE September 2021 $120 3.42% $53.6

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Company 
Expiration
Date
 
Amount
of
Facility
 Weighted Average Interest Rate on Borrowings (a) 
Amount
Outstanding as of
September 30, 2018
  
 (Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE September 2021 $80 3.18% $70.4
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE September 2021 $105 3.18% $34.5
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE September 2021 $105 3.18% $30.5
System Energy VIE September 2021 $120 3.18% $37.7


(a)Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances, if any, by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company variable interest entity for Entergy Louisiana River Bend does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.


The commitment fees on the credit facilities are 0.10% of the undrawn commitment amount for the Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy VIEs.  Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 70% or less of its total capitalization.


The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities had notes payable that are included in debt on the respective balance sheets as of September 30, 20182019 as follows:
Company Description Amount
Entergy Arkansas VIE 3.65% Series L due July 2021 $90 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE 3.17% Series M due December 2023 $40 million
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE 3.38% Series R due August 2020 $70 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE 3.92% Series H due February 2021 $40 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE 3.22% Series I due December 2023 $20 million
System Energy VIE 3.78% Series I due October 2018$85 million
System Energy VIE3.42% Series J due April 2021 $100 million



In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.

Debt Issuances and Retirements

(Entergy Arkansas)

In May 2018, Entergy Arkansas issued $250 million of 4.00% Series first mortgage bonds due June 2028. Entergy Arkansas expects to use the proceeds, together with other funds, to redeem $9.35 million of its 4.72% Series preferred stock, $7 million of its 4.32% Series preferred stock, and $15 million of its 4.56% Series preferred stock, and for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy Louisiana)

In March 2018, Entergy Louisiana issued $750 million of 4.00% collateral trust mortgage bonds due March 2033. Entergy Louisiana used a portion of the proceeds to repay at maturity its $375 million of 6.0% Series first mortgage bonds due May 2018; to repay borrowings from the money pool; and to repay borrowings under its $350


5652

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Debt Issuances and Retirements

(Entergy Arkansas)

In March 2019, Entergy Arkansas issued $350 million credit facility. The remainingof 4.20% Series mortgage bonds due April 2049. Entergy Arkansas is using the proceeds for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy Louisiana)

In March 2019, Entergy Louisiana issued $525 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds due April 2050. Entergy Louisiana is using the proceeds, together with other funds, are being used to finance the construction of the Lake Charles Power Station and the St. Charles Power Station, and for general corporate purposes.


(Entergy Mississippi)

In August 2018,June 2019, Entergy LouisianaMississippi issued $600$300 million of 4.20% collateral trust3.85% Series mortgage bonds due September 2048.June 2049. Entergy LouisianaMississippi used a portion of the proceeds to repay, at maturity, its $150 million of 6.64% Series mortgage bonds due July 2019 and for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy Texas)

In January 2019, Entergy Texas issued $300 million of 6.5%4.0% Series firstmortgage bonds due March 2029 and $400 million of 4.5% Series mortgage bonds due March 2039. Entergy Texas used the proceeds to repay, at maturity, its $500 million of 7.125% Series mortgage bonds due February 2019 and for general corporate purposes.

In September 2019, Entergy Texas issued $300 million of 3.55% Series mortgage bonds due September 2018. The remaining2049.
Entergy Texas is using the proceeds, together with other funds, are being used to finance the construction of the Lake Charles Power Station and St. CharlesMontgomery County Power Station, and for general corporate purposes.

(Entergy New Orleans)

In September 2018, Entergy New Orleans issued $60 million of 4.51% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2033. Entergy New Orleans is using the proceeds for general corporate purposes.


(System Energy)


In March 2018 the2019, System Energy nuclear fuel trust variable interest entity issued $100$134 million of 3.42%2.50% Series J notes2019 revenue refunding bonds due April 2021.2022. The System Energy nuclear fuel trust variable interest entityproceeds were used the proceeds to purchase nuclear fuel.

In October 2018 the System Energy nuclear fuel trust variable interest entity paid, atredeem, prior to maturity, its $85$134 million of 3.78%5.875% Series I notes.1998 pollution control revenue refunding bonds due April 2022.


53

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Fair Value


The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of September 30, 20182019 are as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Entergy
$16,515,836
 
$16,232,180

$17,458,026
 
$18,628,268
Entergy Arkansas
$3,242,282
 
$3,031,681

$3,538,384
 
$3,621,073
Entergy Louisiana
$6,761,123
 
$6,757,649

$7,344,160
 
$8,038,675
Entergy Mississippi
$1,270,830
 
$1,234,124

$1,469,454
 
$1,586,199
Entergy New Orleans
$491,570
 
$499,764

$478,619
 
$522,688
Entergy Texas
$1,527,817
 
$1,546,101

$1,938,303
 
$2,128,842
System Energy
$639,455
 
$610,485

$570,001
 
$554,374


(a)The values excludefair value excludes lease obligations of $34 million at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of $186$190 million at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein.


57

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
 
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Entergy
$15,075,266
 
$15,367,453

$16,168,312
 
$15,880,239
Entergy Arkansas
$2,952,399
 
$2,865,844

$3,225,759
 
$3,002,627
Entergy Louisiana
$6,144,071
 
$6,389,774

$6,805,768
 
$6,834,134
Entergy Mississippi
$1,270,122
 
$1,285,741

$1,325,750
 
$1,276,452
Entergy New Orleans
$436,870
 
$455,968

$483,704
 
$491,569
Entergy Texas
$1,587,150
 
$1,661,902

$1,513,735
 
$1,528,828
System Energy
$551,488
 
$529,119

$630,750
 
$596,123


(a)The values exclude the lease obligations of $34 million at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of $183$187 million at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein.




NOTE 5.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)


Entergy grants stock and stock-based awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over three years.



54

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Stock Options


Entergy granted options on 687,400693,161 shares of its common stock under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan during the first quarter 20182019 with a fair value of $6.99$8.32 per option.  As of September 30, 2018,2019, there were options on 4,071,3012,515,896 shares of common stock outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $74.53.$78.53.  The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the positive difference between the weighted average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of September 30, 2018.2019.  The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of September 30, 20182019 was $26.9$97.7 million.


The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$1.1
 
$1.1

$0.9
 
$1.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.2
 
$0.5

$0.2
 
$0.2
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.1
 
$0.2
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies
$0.4
 
$0.1

58

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$2.9
 
$3.3
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.7
 
$0.8
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies
$1.0
 
$0.5

 2018 2017
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$3.3
 
$3.3
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.8
 
$1.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.5
 
$0.6


Other Equity Awards


In January 20182019, the Board approved and Entergy granted 333,850355,537 restricted stock awards and 182,408180,824 long-term incentive awards under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan.  The restricted stock awards were made effective as of January 25, 201831, 2019 and were valued at $78.08$89.19 per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date.  One-third of the restricted stock awards will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date.  Shares of restricted stock have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period.

In addition, long-term incentive awards were also granted in the form of performance units that represent the value of, and are settled with, one share of Entergy Corporation common stock at the end of the three-year performance period, plus dividends accrued during the performance period on the number of performance units earned. For the 2018-20202019-2021 performance period, a cumulative utility earnings metric was added to the Long-Term Performance Unit Program to supplement theperformance will be measured based 80 percent on relative total shareholder return measure that historically has been used in this program with each measure equally weighted.and 20 percent on a cumulative adjusted earnings per share metric.  The performance units were granted effective as of January 25, 201831, 2019 and half80 percent were valued at $78.08$102.07 per share based on various factors, primarily market conditions; and 20 percent were valued at $89.19 per share, the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date;date.  Performance units have the same dividend rights as shares of Entergy common stock and half were valued at $86.75are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting. Performance units are expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period and compensation cost for the portion of the award based on cumulative adjusted earnings per share will be adjusted based on various factors, primarily market conditions.the number of units that ultimately vest. See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the Long-Term Performance Unit Program.  Shares


55

Table of restricted stock have the same dividendContents
Entergy Corporation and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the 3-year vesting period.  Performance units have the same dividend rights as shares of Entergy common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the 3-year vesting period.Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$8.5
 
$7.6

$8.4
 
$8.5
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$2.2
 
$3.0

$2.1
 
$2.2
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$2.5
 
$2.1
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies
$3.0
 
$2.5


The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$25.6
 
$26.0
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$6.5
 
$6.6
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and materials and supplies
$8.8
 
$7.3

 2018 2017
 (In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$26.0
 
$24.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$6.6
 
$9.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$7.3
 
$6.3





59

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 6.  RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy implemented ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost” effective January 1, 2018. The ASU requires entities to report the service cost component of defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost (net benefit cost) in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period.  The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations and are presented by Entergy in miscellaneous - net in other income. The amendment regarding the presentation of net benefit cost was required to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. In addition, the ASU allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization on a prospective basis. In accordance with the regulatory treatment of net benefit cost of the Registrant Subsidiaries, a regulatory asset/liability will be recorded in other regulatory assets/liabilities for the non-service cost components of net benefit cost that would have been capitalized.

The retroactive presentation changes resulted in decreases in other operation and maintenance expenses and decreases in other income for the three months ended September 30, 2017, with no change in net income, of $30 million for Entergy. The retroactive presentation changes resulted in decreases in other operation and maintenance expenses and decreases in other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, with no change in net income, of $76 million for Entergy.

The retroactive presentation changes resulted in decreases (increases) in other operation and maintenance expenses and decreases (increases) in other income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, with no change in net income, of the following for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 System Energy
 (In Thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2017
$3,515
 
$8,585
 
$778
 
$356
 
$43
 
$1,521
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
$9,995
 
$20,942
 
$1,862
 
$794
 
($194) 
$4,778

The retroactive effect of the change for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 would be decreases in other operation and maintenance expenses and decreases in other income, with no change in net income, of $101 million, $71 million, and $148 million, respectively, for Entergy.

The retroactive effect of the change for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 would be decreases (increases) in other operation and maintenance expenses and decreases (increases) in other income, with no change in net income, of the following for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 System Energy
 (In Thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
$13,668
 
$27,796
 
$2,742
 
$1,293
 
$179
 
$6,190
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016

$13,392
 
$26,118
 
$2,424
 
$1,014
 
($1,054) 
$5,088
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015

$30,671
 
$50,686
 
$6,268
 
$3,975
 
$4,000
 
$10,213


60

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Components of Qualified Net Pension Cost


Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$38,752
 
$33,410

$33,553
 
$38,752
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation66,854
 65,206
73,261
 66,854
Expected return on assets(110,535) (102,056)(103,751) (110,535)
Amortization of prior service cost99
 65

 99
Amortization of loss68,526
 56,930
Amortization of net loss60,395
 68,526
Settlement charges16,291
 
Net pension costs
$63,696
 
$53,555

$79,749
 
$63,696

56

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$100,766
 
$116,256
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation221,114
 200,562
Expected return on assets(311,494) (331,605)
Amortization of prior service cost
 297
Amortization of net loss177,233
 205,578
Settlement charges17,591
 
Net pension costs
$205,210
 
$191,088

 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$116,256
 
$100,230
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation200,562
 195,618
Expected return on assets(331,605) (306,168)
Amortization of prior service cost297
 195
Amortization of loss205,578
 170,790
Net pension costs
$191,088
 
$160,665


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
2018 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
 Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
2019 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
 Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$6,189
 
$8,446
 
$1,822
 
$673
 
$1,589
 
$1,776
 
$5,260
 
$7,284
 
$1,629
 
$568
 
$1,350
 
$1,549
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 13,004
 14,940
 3,769
 1,813
 3,348
 3,227
 14,175
 15,882
 4,068
 1,873
 3,613
 3,364
Expected return on assets (21,851) (24,809) (6,502) (2,993) (6,523) (4,991) (20,177) (22,651) (5,969) (2,696) (5,862) (4,678)
Amortization of loss 13,412
 14,450
 3,610
 1,954
 2,626
 3,715
Amortization of net loss 11,840
 11,643
 3,104
 1,529
 2,334
 2,850
Net pension cost 
$10,754
 
$13,027
 
$2,699
 
$1,447
 
$1,040
 
$3,727
 
$11,098
 
$12,158
 
$2,832
 
$1,274
 
$1,435
 
$3,085
2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$5,090
 
$6,925
 
$1,472
 
$625
 
$1,364
 
$1,536
 
$6,189
 
$8,446
 
$1,822
 
$673
 
$1,589
 
$1,776
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 12,944
 14,809
 3,732
 1,791
 3,392
 3,091
 13,004
 14,940
 3,769
 1,813
 3,348
 3,227
Expected return on assets (20,427) (23,017) (6,131) (2,800) (6,180) (4,663) (21,851) (24,809) (6,502) (2,993) (6,523) (4,991)
Amortization of loss 11,640
 12,354
 3,053
 1,658
 2,310
 2,964
Amortization of net loss 13,412
 14,450
 3,610
 1,954
 2,626
 3,715
Net pension cost 
$9,247
 
$11,071
 
$2,126
 
$1,274
 
$886
 
$2,928
 
$10,754
 
$13,027
 
$2,699
 
$1,447
 
$1,040
 
$3,727

61

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
2019 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$18,567
 
$25,338
 
$5,466
 
$2,019
 
$4,767
 
$5,328
 
$15,782
 
$21,852
 
$4,887
 
$1,706
 
$4,050
 
$4,649
Interest cost on projects benefit obligation 39,012
 44,820
 11,307
 5,439
 10,044
 9,681
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 42,525
 47,646
 12,204
 5,621
 10,837
 10,091
Expected return on assets (65,553) (74,427) (19,506) (8,979) (19,569) (14,973) (60,529) (67,955) (17,905) (8,089) (17,586) (14,032)
Amortization of loss 40,236
 43,350
 10,830
 5,862
 7,878
 11,145
Amortization of net loss 35,522
 34,929
 9,313
 4,588
 7,002
 8,550
Net pension cost 
$32,262
 
$39,081
 
$8,097
 
$4,341
 
$3,120
 
$11,181
 
$33,300
 
$36,472
 
$8,499
 
$3,826
 
$4,303
 
$9,258

57

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$15,270
 
$20,775
 
$4,416
 
$1,875
 
$4,092
 
$4,608
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 38,832
 44,427
 11,196
 5,373
 10,176
 9,273
Expected return on assets (61,281) (69,051) (18,393) (8,400) (18,540) (13,989)
Amortization of loss 34,920
 37,062
 9,159
 4,974
 6,930
 8,892
Net pension cost 
$27,741
 
$33,213
 
$6,378
 
$3,822
 
$2,658
 
$8,784


2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
 Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$18,567
 
$25,338
 
$5,466
 
$2,019
 
$4,767
 
$5,328
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 39,012
 44,820
 11,307
 5,439
 10,044
 9,681
Expected return on assets (65,553) (74,427) (19,506) (8,979) (19,569) (14,973)
Amortization of net loss 40,236
 43,350
 10,830
 5,862
 7,878
 11,145
Net pension cost 
$32,262
 
$39,081
 
$8,097
 
$4,341
 
$3,120
 
$11,181


Non-Qualified Net Pension Cost


Entergy recognized $4.2$4.6 million and $15.8$4.2 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans in the third quarters of 20182019 and 20172018 were settlement charges of $212$955 thousand and $11.6 million,$212 thousand, respectively, related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Entergy recognized $19.7$16.3 million and $28.9$19.7 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were settlement charges of $7$4.6 million and $15.5$7 million, respectively, related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of thisthe plan.


The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017:2018:
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
2019
$67
 
$38
 
$69
 
$5
 
$119
2018
$114
 
$42
 
$73
 
$20
 
$122

$114
 
$42
 
$73
 
$20
 
$122
2017
$111
 
$46
 
$62
 
$18
 
$124


Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s non-qualified pension costs in the third quartersquarter of 2018 and 2017, were settlement charges of $7 thousand and $10 thousand, respectively, related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.


62

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
2019
$211
 
$122
 
$257
 
$16
 
$365
2018
$369
 
$138
 
$230
 
$62
 
$529

$369
 
$138
 
$230
 
$62
 
$529
2017
$483
 
$141
 
$189
 
$55
 
$377


Reflected in Entergy Mississippi’s non-qualified pension costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were settlement charges of $40 thousand related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s non-qualified pension costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, were settlement charges of $30 thousand and $173 thousand, respectively, related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Reflected in Entergy Texas’s non-qualified pension costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were settlement charges of $139 thousand related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.

Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2018 and 2017, included the following components:
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$6,782
 
$6,729
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)12,681
 13,960
Expected return on assets(10,373) (9,408)
Amortization of prior service credit(9,251) (10,356)
Amortization of loss3,432
 5,476
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$3,271
 
$6,401

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, included the following components:
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$20,346
 
$20,187
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)38,043
 41,880
Expected return on assets(31,119) (28,224)
Amortization of prior service credit(27,753) (31,068)
Amortization of loss10,296
 16,428
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$9,813
 
$19,203


6358

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost (Income)

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2019 and 2018, included the following components:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$4,675
 
$6,782
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)11,975
 12,681
Expected return on assets(9,562) (10,373)
Amortization of prior service credit(8,844) (9,251)
Amortization of net loss358
 3,432
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income)
($1,398) 
$3,271

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, included the following components:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$14,025
 
$20,346
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)35,925
 38,043
Expected return on assets(28,686) (31,119)
Amortization of prior service credit(26,532) (27,753)
Amortization of net loss1,074
 10,296
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income)
($4,194) 
$9,813


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
2018 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
2019 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$793
 
$1,556
 
$321
 
$129
 
$330
 
$306
 
$591
 
$1,160
 
$262
 
$92
 
$236
 
$243
Interest cost on APBO 1,997
 2,789
 683
 417
 939
 500
 1,807
 2,666
 670
 395
 854
 476
Expected return on assets (4,342) 
 (1,303) (1,313) (2,446) (783) (3,991) 
 (1,199) (1,237) (2,276) (697)
Amortization of prior service credit (1,278) (1,934) (456) (186) (579) (378) (1,238) (1,837) (439) (171) (561) (363)
Amortization of loss 289
 388
 377
 34
 206
 233
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($2,541) 
$2,799
 
($378) 
($919) 
($1,550) 
($122)
Amortization of net (gain) loss 144
 (174) 181
 58
 121
 89
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income) 
($2,687) 
$1,815
 
($525) 
($863) 
($1,626) 
($252)

59

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$863
 
$1,593
 
$290
 
$142
 
$372
 
$320
 
$793
 
$1,556
 
$321
 
$129
 
$330
 
$306
Interest cost on APBO 2,255
 3,025
 690
 469
 1,124
 559
 1,997
 2,789
 683
 417
 939
 500
Expected return on assets (3,959) 
 (1,200) (1,159) (2,180) (717) (4,342) 
 (1,303) (1,313) (2,446) (783)
Amortization of prior service credit (1,278) (1,934) (456) (186) (579) (378) (1,278) (1,934) (456) (186) (579) (378)
Amortization of loss 1,115
 465
 419
 105
 826
 390
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($1,004) 
$3,149
 
($257) 
($629) 
($437) 
$174
Amortization of net loss 289
 388
 377
 34
 206
 233
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income) 
($2,541) 
$2,799
 
($378) 
($919) 
($1,550) 
($122)


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost (income), including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, included the following components:
2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
2019 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$2,379
 
$4,668
 
$963
 
$387
 
$990
 
$918
 
$1,773
 
$3,480
 
$786
 
$276
 
$708
 
$729
Interest cost on APBO 5,991
 8,367
 2,049
 1,251
 2,817
 1,500
 5,421
 7,998
 2,010
 1,185
 2,562
 1,428
Expected return on assets (13,026) 
 (3,909) (3,939) (7,338) (2,349) (11,973) 
 (3,597) (3,711) (6,828) (2,091)
Amortization of prior service credit (3,834) (5,802) (1,368) (558) (1,737) (1,134) (3,714) (5,511) (1,317) (513) (1,683) (1,089)
Amortization of loss 867
 1,164
 1,131
 102
 618
 699
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($7,623) 
$8,397
 
($1,134) 
($2,757) 
($4,650) 
($366)
Amortization of net (gain) loss 432
 (522) 543
 174
 363
 267
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income) 
($8,061) 
$5,445
 
($1,575) 
($2,589) 
($4,878) 
($756)



64
2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$2,379
 
$4,668
 
$963
 
$387
 
$990
 
$918
Interest cost on APBO 5,991
 8,367
 2,049
 1,251
 2,817
 1,500
Expected return on assets (13,026) 
 (3,909) (3,939) (7,338) (2,349)
Amortization of prior service credit (3,834) (5,802) (1,368) (558) (1,737) (1,134)
Amortization of net loss 867
 1,164
 1,131
 102
 618
 699
Net other postretirement benefit cost (income) 
($7,623) 
$8,397
 
($1,134) 
($2,757) 
($4,650) 
($366)



60

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2017 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
  (In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period 
$2,589
 
$4,779
 
$870
 
$426
 
$1,116
 
$960
Interest cost on APBO 6,765
 9,075
 2,070
 1,407
 3,372
 1,677
Expected return on assets (11,877) 
 (3,600) (3,477) (6,540) (2,151)
Amortization of prior service credit (3,834) (5,802) (1,368) (558) (1,737) (1,134)
Amortization of loss 3,345
 1,395
 1,257
 315
 2,478
 1,170
Net other postretirement benefit cost 
($3,012) 
$9,447
 
($771) 
($1,887) 
($1,311) 
$522


Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the third quarters of 20182019 and 2017:2018:
2018 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
2019 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
 (In Thousands)   (In Thousands)  
Entergy                
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit 
($99) 
$5,595
 
($71) 
$5,425
Amortization of loss (21,958) (1,932) (850) (24,740)
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit 
$—
 
$5,375
 
($50) 
$5,325
Amortization of net gain (loss) (20,686) 308
 (541) (20,919)
Settlement loss 
 
 (76) (76) (16,257) 
 (373) (16,630)
 
($22,057) 
$3,663
 
($997) 
($19,391) 
($36,943) 
$5,683
 
($964) 
($32,224)
Entergy Louisiana                
Amortization of prior service credit 
$—
 
$1,934
 
$—
 
$1,934
 
$—
 
$1,837
 
$—
 
$1,837
Amortization of loss (867) (388) (2) (1,257)
Amortization of net gain (loss) (699) 174
 (1) (526)
 
($867) 
$1,546
 
($2) 
$677
 
($699) 
$2,011
 
($1) 
$1,311
2017
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total
2018
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total


(In Thousands)


(In Thousands)

Entergy















Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit

($65)

$6,718


($88)

$6,565
Amortization of loss
(18,451)
(2,202)
(827)
(21,480)
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit

($99)

$5,595


($71)

$5,425
Amortization of net loss
(21,958)
(1,932)
(850)
(24,740)
Settlement loss




(4,200)
(4,200)




(76)
(76)



($18,516)

$4,516


($5,115)

($19,115)

($22,057)

$3,663


($997)

($19,391)
Entergy Louisiana















Amortization of prior service credit

$—


$1,934


$—


$1,934


$—


$1,934


$—


$1,934
Amortization of loss
(865)
(465)
(2)
(1,332)
Amortization of net loss
(867)
(388)
(2)
(1,257)



($865)

$1,469


($2)

$602


($867)

$1,546


($2)

$677


6561

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements




Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
2018
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total
2019
Qualified
Pension
Costs

Other
Postretirement
Costs

Non-Qualified
Pension Costs

Total


(In Thousands)


(In Thousands)

Entergy















Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit

($297)

$16,786


($211)

$16,278
Amortization of loss
(65,870)
(5,801)
(2,832)
(74,503)
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit

$—


$16,125


($148)

$15,977
Amortization of net gain (loss)
(58,156)
923

(1,655)
(58,888)
Settlement loss




(2,098)
(2,098)
(17,557)


(1,128)
(18,685)



($66,167)

$10,985


($5,141)

($60,323)

($75,713)

$17,048


($2,931)

($61,596)
Entergy Louisiana















Amortization of prior service credit

$—


$5,802


$—


$5,802


$—


$5,511


$—


$5,511
Amortization of loss
(2,601)
(1,164)
(5)
(3,770)
Amortization of net gain (loss)
(2,096)
522

(4)
(1,578)



($2,601)

$4,638


($5)

$2,032


($2,096)

$6,033


($4)

$3,933
2018 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
  (In Thousands)  
Entergy        
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit 
($297) 
$16,786
 
($211) 
$16,278
Amortization of net loss (65,870) (5,801) (2,832) (74,503)
Settlement loss 
 
 (2,098) (2,098)
  
($66,167) 
$10,985
 
($5,141) 
($60,323)
Entergy Louisiana        
Amortization of prior service credit 
$—
 
$5,802
 
$—
 
$5,802
Amortization of net loss (2,601) (1,164) (5) (3,770)
  
($2,601) 
$4,638
 
($5) 
$2,032

2017 Qualified
Pension
Costs
 Other
Postretirement
Costs
 Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
 Total
  (In Thousands)  
Entergy        
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit 
($195) 
$20,152
 
($266) 
$19,691
Amortization of loss (55,351) (6,606) (2,648) (64,605)
Settlement loss 
 
 (5,965) (5,965)
  
($55,546) 
$13,546
 
($8,879) 
($50,879)
Entergy Louisiana        
Amortization of prior service credit 
$—
 
$5,802
 
$—
 
$5,802
Amortization of loss (2,594) (1,395) (7) (3,996)
  
($2,594) 
$4,407
 
($7) 
$1,806


Employer Contributions


Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute $383.5$176.9 million to its qualified pension plans in 2018.2019.  As of September 30, 2018,2019, Entergy had contributed $315.6$123.1 million to its pension plans.  Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans for their employees in 2018:2019:
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands)
Expected 2019 pension contributions
$27,112
 
$26,451
 
$7,701
 
$1,800
 
$1,645
 
$8,285
Pension contributions made through September 2019
$18,222
 
$18,272
 
$5,186
 
$1,237
 
$1,192
 
$5,631
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2019
$8,890
 
$8,179
 
$2,515
 
$563
 
$453
 
$2,654

 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 
System
Energy
 (In Thousands)
Expected 2018 pension contributions
$64,062
 
$71,919
 
$14,933
 
$7,250
 
$10,883
 
$13,786
Pension contributions made through September 2018
$51,982
 
$58,363
 
$12,203
 
$5,938
 
$9,323
 
$11,152
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2018
$12,080
 
$13,556
 
$2,730
 
$1,312
 
$1,560
 
$2,634




6662

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


NOTE 7.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Entergy Corporation


Entergy’s reportable segments as of September 30, 20182019 are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.utility service in portions of Louisiana.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and ownsincludes the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.  “All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity.


Entergy’s segment financial information for the third quarters of 20182019 and 20172018 is as follows:
 Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
2019          
Operating revenues 
$2,840,222
 
$300,363
 
$9
 
($19) 
$3,140,575
Income taxes 
$71,698
 
($30,855) 
($11,642) 
$—
 
$29,201
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$581,964
 
($140,501) 
($40,105) 
($31,899) 
$369,459
2018                    
Operating revenues 
$2,724,279
 
$380,080
 
$—
 
($40) 
$3,104,319
 
$2,724,279
 
$380,080
 
$—
 
($40) 
$3,104,319
Income taxes 
($137,035) 
($135,659) 
($10,312) 
$—
 
($283,006) 
($137,035) 
($135,659) 
($10,312) 
$—
 
($283,006)
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$507,745
 
$105,571
 
($41,601) 
($31,897) 
$539,818
 
$507,745
 
$105,571
 
($41,601) 
($31,897) 
$539,818
2017          
Operating revenues 
$2,820,421
 
$423,245
 
$—
 
($38) 
$3,243,628
Income taxes 
$230,647
 
$25,563
 
($14,415) 
$—
 
$241,795
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$403,733
 
$55,765
 
($25,956) 
($31,898) 
$401,644


Entergy’s segment financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 is as follows:
 Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy Utility 
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
 All Other Eliminations Entergy
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
2019          
Operating revenues $7,392,641 $1,023,757 $11 
($42) $8,416,367
Income taxes $81,283 $25,763 
($33,616) 
$—
 $73,430
Consolidated net income (loss) $1,150,863 
($68,804) 
($117,725) 
($95,695) $868,639
Total assets as of September 30, 2019 $48,348,371 $4,122,007 $501,983 
($2,466,093) $50,506,268
2018                    
Operating revenues 
$7,389,477
 
$1,107,606
 
$—
 
($113) 
$8,496,970
 $7,389,477 $1,107,606 
$—
 
($113) $8,496,970
Income taxes 
($325,134) 
($166,882) 
($27,921) 
$—
 
($519,937) 
($325,134) 
($166,882) 
($27,921) 
$—
 
($519,937)
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$1,104,078
 
$31,456
 
($114,962) 
($95,695) 
$924,877
 $1,104,078 $31,456 
($114,962) 
($95,695) $924,877
Total assets as of September 30, 2018 
$44,889,498
 
$5,507,013
 
$1,274,909
 
($3,200,248) 
$48,471,172
2017          
Operating revenues 
$7,156,865
 
$1,293,867
 
$—
 
($96) 
$8,450,636
Income taxes 
$459,990
 
($507,719) 
($39,826) 
$—
 
($87,555)
Consolidated net income (loss) 
$817,738
 
$252,455
 
($73,434) 
($95,695) 
$901,064
Total assets as of December 31, 2017 
$42,978,669
 
$5,638,009
 $1,011,612 
($2,921,141) 
$46,707,149
Total assets as of December 31, 2018 $44,777,167 $5,459,275 $733,366 
($2,694,742) $48,275,066


The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business is sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.”  Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity. Almost all of Entergy’s goodwill is related to the Utility segment.




6763

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, Entergy management has undertaken a strategy to manage and reduce the risk of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business, which includes taking actions to reduce the sizeshut down and sell all of the remaining plants in the merchant nuclear fleet. These decisions and transactions resulted in asset impairments; employee retention and severance expenses and other benefits-related costs; and contracted economic development contributions.


Total restructuring charges for the third quarters of 20182019 and 20172018 were comprised of the following:
2018 20172019 2018
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$143
 
$14
 
$157
 
$36
 
$21
 
$57

$181
 
$14
 
$195
 
$143
 
$14
 
$157
Restructuring costs accrued43
 
 43
 23
 
 23
14
 
 14
 43
 
 43
Non-cash portion
 
 
 
 (7) (7)
Cash paid out86
 
 86
 
 
 
Balance as of September 30,
$186
 
$14
 
$200
 
$59
 
$14
 
$73

$109
 
$14
 
$123
 
$186
 
$14
 
$200


In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities incurred $8 million in the third quarter 2019 and $155 million in the third quarter 2018 and $16 million in the third quarter 2017 of impairment chargesand other related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets. These costs are charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating livescharges associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.these strategic decisions and transactions.


Total restructuring charges for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were comprised of the following:
2018 20172019 2018
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs TotalEmployee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
 Contracted economic development costs Total
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$83
 
$14
 
$97
 
$70
 
$21
 
$91

$179
 
$14
 
$193
 
$83
 
$14
 
$97
Restructuring costs accrued103
 
 103
 89
 
 89
70
 
 70
 103
 
 103
Non-cash portion
 
 
 
 (7) (7)
Cash paid out
 
 
 100
 
 100
140
 
 140
 
 
 
Balance as of September 30,
$186
 
$14
 
$200
 
$59
 
$14
 
$73

$109
 
$14
 
$123
 
$186
 
$14
 
$200


In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities incurred $98 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and $297 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $422 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of impairment and other related charges related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending,associated with these strategic decisions and expenditures for capital assets.transactions.



6864

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Going forward, Entergy Wholesale Commodities expects to incur employee retention and severance expenses associated with management’s strategy to reduceexit the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleetpower business of approximately $155$100 million in 2018,2019, of which $103$70 million has been incurred as of September 30, 2018,2019, and a total of approximately $215$135 million from 20192020 through mid-2022.2022.


Registrant Subsidiaries


Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business.  Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations is managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results.




NOTE 8.  RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Market Risk


In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market risks.  Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular commodity or instrument.  All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk including commodity price risk, equity price, and interest rate risk.  Entergy uses derivatives primarily to mitigate commodity price risk, particularly power price and fuel price risk.


The Utility has limited exposure to the effects of market risk because it operates primarily under cost-based rate regulation.  To the extent approved by their retail regulators, the Utility operating companies use derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to price volatility inherent in their purchased power, fuel, and gas purchased for resale costs that are recovered from customers.


As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy and capacity in the day ahead or spot markets.  In addition to its forward physical power and gas contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to mitigate commodity price risk.  When the market price falls, the combination of instruments is expected to settle in gains that offset lower revenue from generation, which results in a more predictable cash flow.


Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity.  For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk.  A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk.  Hedging instruments and volumes are chosen based on ability to mitigate risk associated with future energy and capacity prices; however, other considerations are factored into hedge product and volume decisions including corporate liquidity, corporate credit ratings, counterparty credit risk, hedging costs, firm settlement risk, and product availability in the marketplace.  Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies.  Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods.  These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.


Derivatives


Some derivative instruments are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions


6965

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sale transactions due to their physical settlement provisions.  Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements.  Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options and interest rate swaps.  Entergy may enter into financially-settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk that may or may not be designated as hedging instruments.


Entergy enters into derivatives to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities.  Electricity over-the-counter instruments and futures contracts that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation.  The maximum length of time over which Entergy Wholesale Commodities is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at September 30, 20182019 is approximately 2.51.5 years.  Planned generation currently under contract from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is 98%97% for the remainder of 2018,2019, of which approximately 87%72% is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/normal sale contracts.  Total planned generation for the remainder of 20182019 is 6.76.1 TWh.


Entergy may use standardized master netting agreements to help mitigate the credit risk of derivative instruments. These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty and may include collateral requirements. Cash, letters of credit, and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk. The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds an established threshold. The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit, which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty,guarantee, as determined in accordance with Entergy’s credit policy. In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.


Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations depending on the mark-to-market values of the contracts. The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guarantee.  As of September 30, 2018,2019, there were no derivative contracts with seven counterparties were in a liability position (approximately $68 million total).position. In addition to the corporate guarantee, $30$13 million in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties. As of December 31, 2017, derivative contracts with eight counterparties were in a liability position (approximately $65 million total). In addition to the corporate guarantee, $1 million in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties and $4$2 million in cash collateral and $34$48 million in letters of credit were required to be posted by its counterparties to the Entergy subsidiary. As of December 31, 2018, derivative contracts with 6 counterparties were in a liability position (approximately $34 million total). In addition to the corporate guarantee, $19 million in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below investment grade, Entergy would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under the contract at the applicable date.


Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps and options that financially settle against either the average Henry Hub Gas Daily prices or the NYMEX futures.Henry Hub. These swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel expense with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities. All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas price volatility for electric generation at Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Mississippi and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy New Orleans. The maximum length of time over which Entergy has executed natural gas swaps and options as of September 30, 2019 is 4.5 years for Entergy Louisiana and the maximum length of time over which Entergy has executed natural gas swaps as of September 30, 2019 is 6 months each for Entergy Mississippi and Entergy New Orleans. The total volume of natural gas swaps and options outstanding as of September 30, 20182019 is 13,814,00040,346,000 MMBtu for Entergy, including 6,300,00032,880,000 MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana, 6,790,0006,210,000 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi, and 724,000 MMBtu1,256,000 for Entergy New Orleans. Credit support for these natural gas swaps and options is covered by master agreements that do not require Entergy to provide collateral based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to requests for collateral.



66

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

During the second quarter 2018,2019, Entergy participated in the annual financial transmission rights auction process for the MISO planning year of June 1, 20182019 through May 31, 2019.2020. Financial transmission rights are derivative instruments which represent economic hedges of future congestion charges that will be incurred in serving Entergy’s customer load. They are not designated as hedging instruments. Entergy initially records financial transmission rights at their estimated fair value and subsequently adjusts the carrying value to their estimated fair value at the end of each

70

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

accounting period prior to settlement. Unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities are included in operating revenues. The Utility operating companies recognize regulatory liabilities or assets for unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights. The total volume of financial transmission rights outstanding as of September 30, 20182019 is 77,52079,459 GWh for Entergy, including 17,55717,898 GWh for Entergy Arkansas, 33,14436,474 GWh for Entergy Louisiana, 10,29510,087 GWh for Entergy Mississippi, 3,7583,751 GWh for Entergy New Orleans, and 12,44110,931 GWh for Entergy Texas. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by the Utility operating companies is covered by cash and/or letters of credit issued by each Utility operating company as required by MISO. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities is covered by cash. No cash or letters of credit were required to be posted for financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017.2018. Letters of credit posted with MISO covered the financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Arkansas,Mississippi as of September 30, 2019 and Entergy Mississippi and Entergy Texas as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.2018.



67

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2019 are shown in the table below.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $35 ($5) $30 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $14 ($2) $12 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $5 ($5) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $2 ($2) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $9 ($3) $6 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $1 $— $1 Utility
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $17 ($1) $16 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities
(current portion)
 $4 ($4) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps and options Other current liabilities
(current portion)
 $4 $— $4 Utility
Natural gas swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $1 $— $1 Utility

68

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 are shown in the table below.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $32 ($32) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $7 ($7) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $54 ($33) $21 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $20 ($7) $13 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $4 ($2) $2 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $1 $— $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $2 $— $2 Utility
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $16 ($1) $15 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $1 ($1) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps and options Other current liabilities $1 $— $1 Utility

Instrument Balance Sheet Location Gross Fair Value (a) Offsetting Position (b) Net Fair Value (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $10 ($10) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $10 ($10) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $62 ($10) $52 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $24 ($11) $13 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $3 ($3) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps Prepayments and other $1 $— $1 Utility
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $31 ($2) $29 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities
(current portion)
 $4 ($3) $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $1 $— $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities

71

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 are shown in the table below.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Gross Fair Value (a) Offsetting Position (b) Net Fair Value (c) (d) Business
    (In Millions)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $19 ($19) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $19 ($14) $5 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $86 ($20) $66 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion) $17 ($14) $3 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments          
Assets:          
Electricity swaps and options Prepayments and other (current portion) $9 ($9) $— Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $22 ($1) $21 Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:          
Electricity swaps and options Other current liabilities (current portion) $9 ($8) $1 Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $6 $— $6 Utility


(a)Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheet
(d)Excludes cash collateral in the amount of $30$2 million held and $13 million posted as of September 30, 20182019 and $1$19 million posted and $4 million held as of December 31, 2017.2018. Also excludes letters of credit in the amount of $5$48 million held as of September 30, 2019 and $4 million posted as of September 30, 2018 and $34 million in letters of credit held as of December 31, 2017.2018.



7269

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
Instrument 
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location 
Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)
 
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location 
Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)
 (In Millions) (In Millions) (In Millions) (In Millions)
2019 
Electricity swaps and options ($7) Competitive businesses operating revenues $19
 
2018  
Electricity swaps and options ($51) Competitive businesses operating revenues ($11) ($51) Competitive businesses operating revenues ($11)
 
2017 
Electricity swaps and options $43 Competitive businesses operating revenues $23


(a)Before taxes of ($2)$4 million and $8($2) million for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively


The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
Instrument Amount of gain recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)

 (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2019      
Electricity swaps and options $145 Competitive businesses operating revenues $76
       
2018      
Electricity swaps and options ($40) Competitive businesses operating revenues ($38)
Instrument Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other
comprehensive income
 Income Statement location Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)

 (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2018      
Electricity swaps and options ($40) Competitive businesses operating revenues ($38)
       
2017      
Electricity swaps and options $136 Competitive businesses operating revenues $87

    
(a)Before taxes of ($8)$16 million and $30($8) million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively


At each reporting period,Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12, Entergy measuresmeasured its hedges for ineffectiveness. Any ineffectiveness iswas recognized in earnings during the period. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges iswas recorded in competitive businessbusinesses operating revenues. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was ($3.1) million and $2.4 million, respectively.million. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was ($5.2) million and $6.4 million, respectively.million.


73

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Based on market prices as of September 30, 2018,2019, unrealized gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled ($58)$42 million of net unrealized losses.  Approximately ($47)$30 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to

70

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

operating revenues in the next twelve months.  The actual amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.    


Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation.  Gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in other comprehensive income until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.


The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:

Instrument Amount of gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income Income Statement

location
 Amount of gain (loss)

recorded in the income statement
  (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2019
Natural gas swaps$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($2)
Financial transmission rights$—Purchased power expense(b)$25
Electricity swaps and options$—(c)Competitive business operating revenues$1
2018      
Natural gas swaps $— Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)$—
Financial transmission rights $— Purchased power expense(b)$31
Electricity swaps and options $—(c)Competitive business operating revenues ($2)
2017
Natural gas swaps$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($3)
Financial transmission rights$—Purchased power expense(b)$28
Electricity swaps and options($2)(c)Competitive business operating revenues$—




7471

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
Instrument

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income

Income Statement

location


Amount of gain (loss)

recorded in the income statement
  (In Millions)   (In Millions)
2019
Natural gas swaps and options$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($9)
Financial transmission rights
$—
Purchased power expense(b)$78
Electricity swaps and options$—(c)Competitive business operating revenues$4
2018 
    
Natural gas swaps $— Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)$5
Financial transmission rights
$—
Purchased power expense(b)$104
Electricity swaps and options $—(c)Competitive business operating revenues $—
2017
Natural gas swaps$—Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale(a)($20)
Financial transmission rights$—Purchased power expense(b)$103
Electricity swaps and options$2(c)Competitive business operating revenues$—



(a)Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps and options are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(c)Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income from electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items.





7572

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of September 30, 20182019 are shown in the table below. Certain investments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Gross Fair Value (a) Offsetting Position (b) Net Fair Value (c) (d) Registrant Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Registrant
 (In Millions)  (In Millions) 
Assets:  
Natural gas swaps Prepayments and other $1.0 $— $1.0 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps Prepayments and other $0.4 $— $0.4 Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps and options Prepayments and other $0.1 $— $0.1 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion) $1.0 $— $1.0 Entergy Louisiana
  
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $11.6 ($0.3) $11.3 Entergy Arkansas Prepayments and other $4.0 ($0.1) $3.9 Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $12.2 ($0.2) $12.0 Entergy Louisiana Prepayments and other $9.1 $— $9.1 Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $3.7 $— $3.7 Entergy Mississippi Prepayments and other $1.5 $— $1.5 Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $2.1 $— $2.1 Entergy New Orleans Prepayments and other $0.7 $— $0.7 Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $1.7 ($1.6) $0.1 Entergy Texas Prepayments and other $1.7 ($0.4) $1.3 Entergy Texas
 
Liabilities: 
Natural gas swaps and options Other current liabilities $2.2 $— $2.2 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps and options Other non-current liabilities $1.4 $— $1.4 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $1.1 $— $1.1 Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $0.1 $— $0.1 Entergy New Orleans



73

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of December 31, 20172018 are as follows:
Instrument Balance Sheet Location Gross Fair Value (a) Offsetting Position (b) Net Fair Value (c) (d) Registrant Balance Sheet Location Fair Value (a) Offset (b) Net (c) (d) Registrant
 (In Millions)  (In Millions) 
Assets:  
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $3.2 ($0.2) $3.0 Entergy Arkansas
Natural gas swaps and options Prepayments and other $0.3 $— $0.3 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps and options Other deferred debits and other assets $1.6 $— $1.6 Entergy Louisiana
 
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $11.0 ($0.8) $10.2 Entergy Louisiana Prepayments and other $3.6 ($0.2) $3.4 Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $2.1 $— $2.1 Entergy Mississippi Prepayments and other $8.4 ($0.1) $8.3 Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $2.2 $— $2.2 Entergy New Orleans Prepayments and other $2.2 $— $2.2 Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights Prepayments and other $3.6 ($0.2) $3.4 Entergy Texas Prepayments and other $1.3 $— $1.3 Entergy New Orleans
  
Liabilities:  
Financial transmission rights Other current liabilities $0.9 ($1.4) ($0.5) Entergy Texas
 
Natural gas swaps and options Other current liabilities $1.1 $— $1.1 Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $5.0 $— $5.0 Entergy Louisiana Other current liabilities $0.1 $— $0.1 Entergy New Orleans
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $1.2 $— $1.2 Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps Other current liabilities $0.2 $— $0.2 Entergy New Orleans


(a)Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets
(d)As of September 30, 2019, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.2 million for Entergy Mississippi. As of December 31, 2018, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $1 million for Entergy Arkansas, $0.2 million for Entergy Mississippi, and $3.6$4.1 million for Entergy Texas.




7674

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2017, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of $0.2 million for Entergy Arkansas, $0.1 million for Entergy Mississippi, and $0.05 million for Entergy Texas.


The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:
Instrument Income Statement Location Amount of gain

(loss) recorded

in the income statement
 Registrant
    (In Millions)
2019
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($1.7)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.3)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.1)(a)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$3.5(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$14.4(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$1.9(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense($0.3)(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$5.5(b)Entergy Texas
  
2018      
Natural gas swaps Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale ($0.7)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale $0.1(a)Entergy Mississippi
       
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $10.1(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $13.8(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $5.4(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $2.0(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense ($0.4)(b)Entergy Texas
2017
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($2.6)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.6)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.2(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$9.4(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$4.7(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$1.9(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$7.0(b)Entergy Texas





7775

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:

Instrument

Income Statement Location

Amount of gain

(loss) recorded

in the income statement


Registrant
    (In Millions)  
2019
Natural gas swaps and optionsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($3.6)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($5.5)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale$0.1(a)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$15.4(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$40.9(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$5.3(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$2.2(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$13.6(b)Entergy Texas
2018   
  
Natural gas swaps Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale $4.2(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale $0.9(a)Entergy Mississippi
       
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $20.1(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $57.2(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $23.0(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense $10.5(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights Purchased power expense ($5.6)(b)Entergy Texas
2017
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($16.3)(a)Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($3.1)(a)Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swapsFuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale($0.1)(a)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$19.3(b)Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$38.9(b)Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$16.3(b)Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$7.7(b)Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rightsPurchased power expense$19.2(b)Entergy Texas



(a)Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps and options are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps and options are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.


Fair Values


The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using historical prices, bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling.  Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates

78

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

of fair value.  Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market exchange.  Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than those instruments held by the Entergy

76

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Wholesale Commodities business are reflected in future rates and therefore do not affect net income. Entergy considers the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.


Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value.  The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.


Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs.  


The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:


Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.  Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents (temporary cash investments, securitization recovery trust account, and escrow accounts), debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts.swaps traded on exchanges with active markets.  Cash equivalents includes all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.


Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads.  Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value.  Level 2 inputs include the following:


quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.


Level 2 consists primarily of individually-owned debt instruments.instruments and gas swaps and options valued using observable inputs.


Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources.  These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best estimate of fair value for the asset or liability.  Level 3 consists primarily of financial transmission rights and derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.


The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates.  They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities.  The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Business Unit Risk Control group and the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group.  The primary functions of the Business Unit Risk

79

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Control group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market risk analyses and valuations

77

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of market risks, and implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system.  The Business Unit Risk Control group is also responsible for managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis.  The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group performs functions related to market and counterparty settlements, revenue reporting and analysis and financial accounting. The Business Unit Risk Control group reports to the Vice President and Treasurer while the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.


The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable to or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date.  These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business.  The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices.  The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities.  For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.


The amounts reflected as the fair values of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes.  Inputs to the valuation include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third partythird-party data aggregator, and U.S. Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate.  As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value.  


On a daily basis, the Business Unit Risk Control group calculates the mark-to-market for electricity swaps and options.  The Business Unit Risk Control group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to other sources of forward market prices or to settlement prices of actual market transactions.  Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on these other sources of forward market prices or settlement prices of actual market transactions.  Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions when available and compared with other sources of market implied volatilities.  Moreover, on at least a monthlyquarterly basis, the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark-to-market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis.  The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions, an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio.  In particular, the credit and liquidity effects are calculated for this analysis.  This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.


The values of financial transmission rights are based on unobservable inputs, including estimates of congestion costs in MISO between applicable generation and load pricing nodes based on the 50th percentile of historical prices.  They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities.  The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Business Unit Risk Control group.  The values are calculated internally and verified against the data published by MISO. Entergy’s Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reviewsgroups review these valuations for reasonableness, with the assistance of others within the organization with knowledge of the various inputs and assumptions used in the valuation. The Business Unit Risk Control groups report to the Vice President and Treasurer.  The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reportsgroups report to the Chief Accounting Officer.




8078

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017.2018.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
 (In Millions) (In Millions)
Assets:                
Temporary cash investments 
$923
 
$—
 
$—
 
$923
 
$885
 
$—
 
$—
 
$885
Decommissioning trust funds (a):                
Equity securities 1,569
 
 
 1,569
 836
 
 
 836
Debt securities 1,167
 1,678
 
 2,845
 1,214
 1,754
 
 2,968
Common trusts (b)       3,030
       2,325
Power contracts 
 
 48
 48
Securitization recovery trust account 58
 
 
 58
 55
 
 
 55
Escrow accounts 401
 
 
 401
 410
 
 
 410
Gas hedge contracts 1
 
 
 1
 
 1
 
 1
Financial transmission rights 
 
 29
 29
 
 
 16
 16
 
$4,119
 
$1,678
 
$29
 
$8,856
 
$3,400
 
$1,755
 
$64
 
$7,544
                
Liabilities:                
Power contracts 
$—
 
$—
 
$67
 
$67
Gas hedge contracts 
$4
 
$1
 
$—
 
$5


2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$424
 
$—
 
$—
 
$424
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 1,686
 
 
 1,686
Debt securities 1,259
 1,625
 
 2,884
Common trusts (b)       2,350
Power contracts 
 
 3
 3
Securitization recovery trust account 51
 
 
 51
Escrow accounts 403
 
 
 403
Gas hedge contracts 
 2
 
 2
Financial transmission rights 
 
 15
 15
  
$3,823
 
$1,627
 
$18
 
$7,818
Liabilities:        
Power contracts 
$—
 
$—
 
$34
 
$34
Gas hedge contracts 1
 
 
 1
  
$1
 
$—
 
$34
 
$35

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$725
 
$—
 
$—
 
$725
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 526
 
 
 526
Debt securities 1,125
 1,425
 
 2,550
Common trusts (b)       4,136
Power contracts 
 
 5
 5
Securitization recovery trust account 45
 
 
 45
Escrow accounts 406
 
 
 406
Financial transmission rights 
 
 21
 21
  
$2,827
 
$1,425
 
$26
 
$8,414
Liabilities:        
Power contracts 
$—
 
$—
 
$70
 
$70
Gas hedge contracts 6
 
 
 6
  
$6
 
$—
 
$70
 
$76

(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.


81

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 2018 2017
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
($25) 
$41
 
$38
 
$57
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings(4) 
 2
 
Included in other comprehensive income(51) 
 43
 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 19
 
 8
Settlements13
 (31) (23) (28)
Balance as of September 30,
($67) 
$29
 
$60
 
$37

(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 2018 2017
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights

(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
($65) 
$21
 
$5
 
$21
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings(5) (1) 6
 1
Included in other comprehensive income(40) 
 136
 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 67
 
 56
Issuances of financial transmission rights
 46
 
 62
Settlements43
 (104) (87) (103)
Balance as of September 30,
($67) 
$29
 
$60
 
$37

(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.


82

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification as of September 30, 2018:
Transaction Type
Fair Value
as of
September 30, 2018
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Range
from
Average
%
Effect on
Fair Value
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Power contracts - electricity swaps($67)Unit contingent discount+/-4% - 4.75%($6) - ($7)

The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction TypePositionChange to Input
Effect on
Fair Value
Unit contingent discountElectricity swapsSellIncrease (Decrease)Decrease (Increase)

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Entergy Arkansas
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$208.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$208.7
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 2.2
 
 
 2.2
Debt securities 111.0
 267.5
 
 378.5
Common trusts (b)       616.2
Securitization recovery trust account 8.6
 
 
 8.6
Financial transmission rights 
 
 11.3
 11.3
  
$330.5
 
$267.5
 
$11.3
 
$1,225.5

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 
$11.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$11.7
Debt securities 115.8
 232.4
 
 348.2
Common trusts (b)       585.0
Securitization recovery trust account 3.7
 
 
 3.7
Escrow accounts 2.4
 
 
 2.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.0
 3.0
  
$133.6
 
$232.4
 
$3.0
 
$954.0


83

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Louisiana
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$213.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$213.2
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 12.9
 
 
 12.9
Debt securities 157.9
 362.6
 
 520.5
Common trusts (b)       861.8
Escrow accounts 288.1
 
 
 288.1
Securitization recovery trust account 10.0
 
 
 10.0
Gas hedge contracts 1.0
 
 
 1.0
Financial transmission rights 
 
 12.0
 12.0
  
$683.1
 
$362.6
 
$12.0
 
$1,919.5

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$30.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$30.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):  
  
  
  
Equity securities 15.2
 
 
 15.2
Debt securities 143.3
 350.5
 
 493.8
Common trusts (b)       803.1
Escrow accounts 289.5
 
 
 289.5
Securitization recovery trust account 2.0
 
 
 2.0
Financial transmission rights 
 
 10.2
 10.2
  
$480.1
 
$350.5
 
$10.2
 
$1,643.9
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$5.0
 
$—
 
$—
 
$5.0

Entergy Mississippi
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Escrow accounts $32.3 
$—
 
$—
 $32.3
Gas hedge contracts 0.4
 
 
 0.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.7
 3.7
  
$32.7
 
$—
 
$3.7
 
$36.4


84

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$4.5
 
$—
 
$—
 
$4.5
Escrow accounts 32.0
 
 
 32.0
Financial transmission rights 
 
 2.1
 2.1
  
$36.5
 
$—
 
$2.1
 
$38.6
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$1.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$1.2

Entergy New Orleans
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$32.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$32.9
Securitization recovery trust account 5.6
 
 
 5.6
Escrow accounts 80.4
 
 
 80.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 2.1
 2.1
  
$118.9
 
$—
 
$2.1
 
$121.0

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$32.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$32.7
Securitization recovery trust account 1.5
 
 
 1.5
Escrow accounts 81.9
 
 
 81.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 2.2
 2.2
  
$116.1
 
$—
 
$2.2
 
$118.3
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.2

Entergy Texas
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Temporary cash investments 
$19.0
 
$—
 
$—
 
$19.0
Securitization recovery trust account 33.7
 
 
 33.7
Financial transmission rights 
 
 0.1
 0.1
  
$52.7
 
$—
 
$0.1
 
$52.8


85

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Temporary cash investments 
$115.5
 
$—
 
$—
 
$115.5
Securitization recovery trust account 37.7
 
 
 37.7
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.4
 3.4
  
$153.2
 
$—
 
$3.4
 
$156.6

System Energy
2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$254.4
 
$—
 
$—
 
$254.4
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 7.4
 
 
 7.4
Debt securities 211.1
 148.1
 
 359.2
Common trusts (b)       585.8
  
$472.9
 
$148.1
 
$—
 
$1,206.8

2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$287.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$287.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 3.1
 
 
 3.1
Debt securities 187.2
 143.3
 
 330.5
Common trusts (b)       572.1
  
$477.4
 
$143.3
 
$—
 
$1,192.8


(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.



8679

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
 2019 2018
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$72
 
$29
 
($25) 
$41
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings1
 
 (4) 
Included in other comprehensive income(7) 
 (51) 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 12
 
 19
Settlements(18) (25) 13
 (31)
Balance as of September 30,
$48
 
$16
 
($67) 
$29


(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is ($1.2) million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
 2019 2018
 Power Contracts Financial transmission rights Power Contracts Financial transmission rights

(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
($31) 
$15
 
($65) 
$21
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)       
Included in earnings4
 
 (5) (1)
Included in other comprehensive income145
 
 (40) 
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
 44
 
 67
Issuances of financial transmission rights
 35
 
 46
Settlements(70) (78) 43
 (104)
Balance as of September 30,
$48
 
$16
 
($67) 
$29


(a)Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is ($4.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.


80

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification as of September 30, 2019:
Transaction TypeFair Value
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Range
from
Average
%
Effect on
Fair Value
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Power contracts - electricity swaps$48Unit contingent discount+/-4% - 4.75%$4 - $5


The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction TypePositionChange to Input
Effect on
Fair Value
Unit contingent discountElectricity swapsSellIncrease (Decrease)Decrease (Increase)

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Entergy Arkansas
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$76.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$76.7
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 6.2
 
 
 6.2
Debt securities 101.4
 306.3
 
 407.7
Common trusts (b)       631.9
Securitization recovery trust account 7.9
 
 
 7.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.9
 3.9
  
$192.2
 
$306.3
 
$3.9
 
$1,134.3

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 
$4.0
 
$—
 
$—
 
$4.0
Debt securities 94.8
 286.5
 
 381.3
Common trusts (b)       526.7
Securitization recovery trust account 4.7
 
 
 4.7
Financial transmission rights 
 
 3.4
 3.4
  
$103.5
 
$286.5
 
$3.4
 
$920.1



81

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Louisiana
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$127.8
 
$—
 
$—
 
$127.8
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 5.3
 
 
 5.3
Debt securities 183.7
 409.7
 
 593.4
Common trusts (b)       886.9
Escrow accounts 294.5
 
 
 294.5
Securitization recovery trust account 10.1
 
 
 10.1
Gas hedge contracts 0.1
 1.0
 
 1.1
Financial transmission rights 
 
 9.1
 9.1
  
$621.5
 
$410.7
 
$9.1
 
$1,928.2
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$2.2
 
$1.4
 
$—
 
$3.6

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$43.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$43.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):  
  
  
  
Equity securities 13.3
 
 
 13.3
Debt securities 162.0
 370.9
 
 532.9
Common trusts (b)       738.8
Escrow accounts 289.5
 
 
 289.5
Securitization recovery trust account 3.6
 
 
 3.6
Gas hedge contracts 
 1.9
 
 1.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 8.3
 8.3
  
$511.5
 
$372.8
 
$8.3
 
$1,631.4
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.7
 
$0.4
 
$—
 
$1.1


Entergy Mississippi
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$98.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$98.9
Escrow accounts 33.0
 
 
 33.0
Financial transmission rights 
 
 1.5
 1.5
  
$131.9
 
$—
 
$1.5
 
$133.4
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$1.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$1.1


82

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$36.9
 
$—
 
$—
 
$36.9
Escrow accounts 32.4
 
 
 32.4
Financial transmission rights 
 
 2.2
 2.2
  
$69.3
 
$—
 
$2.2
 
$71.5


Entergy New Orleans
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Securitization recovery trust account 
$5.3
 
$—
 
$—
 
$5.3
Escrow accounts 82.2
 
 
 82.2
Financial transmission rights 
 
 0.7
 0.7
  
$87.5
 
$—
 
$0.7
 
$88.2
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.1

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$19.7
 
$—
 
$—
 
$19.7
Securitization recovery trust account 2.2
 
 
 2.2
Escrow accounts 80.9
 
 
 80.9
Financial transmission rights 
 
 1.3
 1.3
  
$102.8
 
$—
 
$1.3
 
$104.1
         
Liabilities:        
Gas hedge contracts 
$0.1
 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.1


Entergy Texas
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Temporary cash investments 
$92.3
 
$—
 
$—
 
$92.3
Securitization recovery trust account 31.6
 
 
 31.6
Financial transmission rights 
 
 1.3
 1.3
  
$123.9
 
$—
 
$1.3
 
$125.2


83

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:
        
Securitization recovery trust account 
$40.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$40.2
         
Liabilities:        
Financial transmission rights 
$—
 
$—
 
$0.5
 
$0.5


System Energy
2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$164.2
 
$—
 
$—
 
$164.2
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 5.8
 
 
 5.8
Debt securities 206.0
 189.3
 
 395.3
Common trusts (b)       601.2
  
$376.0
 
$189.3
 
$—
 
$1,166.5

2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In Millions)
Assets:        
Temporary cash investments 
$95.6
 
$—
 
$—
 
$95.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):        
Equity securities 4.4
 
 
 4.4
Debt securities 224.5
 139.7
 
 364.2
Common trusts (b)       500.9
  
$324.5
 
$139.7
 
$—
 
$965.1


(a)The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.


84

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2019.
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$8.2
 
$15.6
 
$2.8
 
$2.0
 
$0.6
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset(0.8) 7.9
 0.6
 (1.6) 6.2
Settlements(3.5) (14.4) (1.9) 0.3
 (5.5)
Balance as of September 30,
$3.9
 
$9.1
 
$1.5
 
$0.7
 
$1.3

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2018.
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1, 2018
$10.5
 
$18.2
 
$4.4
 
$3.0
 
$4.7
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset10.9
 7.6
 4.7
 1.1
 (5.0)
Settlements(10.1) (13.8) (5.4) (2.0) 0.4
Balance as of September 30, 2018
$11.3
 
$12.0
 
$3.7
 
$2.1
 
$0.1
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1,
$10.5
 
$18.2
 
$4.4
 
$3.0
 
$4.7
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset10.9
 7.6
 4.7
 1.1
 (5.0)
Settlements(10.1) (13.8) (5.4) (2.0) 0.4
Balance as of September 30,
$11.3
 
$12.0
 
$3.7
 
$2.1
 
$0.1


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the threenine months ended September 30, 2017.2019.
 Entergy
Arkansas
 Entergy
Louisiana
 Entergy
Mississippi
 Entergy
New
Orleans
 Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of July 1, 2017
$8.3
 
$28.3
 
$9.1
 
$5.2
 
$5.5
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset0.3
 (0.1) 1.1
 0.2
 6.5
Settlements(4.2) (9.4) (4.7) (1.9) (7.0)
Balance as of September 30, 2017
$4.4
 
$18.8
 
$5.5
 
$3.5
 
$5.0
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$3.4
 
$8.3
 
$2.2
 
$1.3
 
($0.5)
Issuances of financial transmission rights9.6
 18.7
 3.9
 2.7
 0.1
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset6.3
 23.0
 0.6
 (1.1) 15.3
Settlements(15.4) (40.9) (5.2) (2.2) (13.6)
Balance as of September 30,
$3.9
 
$9.1
 
$1.5
 
$0.7
 
$1.3



85

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$3.0
 
$10.2
 
$2.1
 
$2.2
 
$3.4
Issuances of financial transmission rights11.8
 20.0
 4.5
 3.7
 6.1
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset16.6
 39.0
 20.1
 6.7
 (15.0)
Settlements(20.1) (57.2) (23.0) (10.5) 5.6
Balance as of September 30,
$11.3
 
$12.0
 
$3.7
 
$2.1
 
$0.1

 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2018
$3.0
 
$10.2
 
$2.1
 
$2.2
 
$3.4
Issuances of financial transmission rights11.8
 20.0
 4.5
 3.7
 6.1
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset16.6
 39.0
 20.1
 6.7
 (15.0)
Settlements(20.1) (57.2) (23.0) (10.5) 5.6
Balance as of September 30, 2018
$11.3
 
$12.0
 
$3.7
 
$2.1
 
$0.1



87

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
 (In Millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2017
$5.4
 
$8.5
 
$3.2
 
$1.1
 
$3.1
Issuances of financial transmission rights8.9
 31.0
 9.6
 5.0
 7.1
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset9.4
 18.2
 9.0
 5.1
 14.0
Settlements(19.3) (38.9) (16.3) (7.7) (19.2)
Balance as of September 30, 2017
$4.4
 
$18.8
 
$5.5
 
$3.5
 
$5.0



NOTE 9.  DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)


The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain nuclear decommissioning trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades. Entergy’s nuclear decommissioning trust funds invest in equity securities, fixed-rate debt securities, and cash and cash equivalents.


As discussed in Note 16 to the financial statements herein and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in January 2019, Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-01 “Financial Instruments (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” effective January 1, 2018. The ASU requires investments in equity securities, excluding those accounted for undercompleted the equity method or resulting in consolidationtransfer of the investee,Vermont Yankee plant to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income. Entergy implemented this ASU using a modified retrospective method, and Entergy recorded an adjustment increasing retained earnings and increasing accumulated other comprehensive loss by $633 million as of January 1, 2018, for the cumulative effectNorthStar. As part of the unrealized gains and losses on investments in equity securities held bytransaction, Entergy transferred the Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust funds that do not meetfund to NorthStar. As of December 31, 2018, the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment. Beginning in 2018, unrealized gains and losses on investments in equity securities held by the nuclear decommissioning trust funds will be recorded in earnings as they occur rather than in other comprehensive income. In accordance with the regulatory treatmentfair value of the decommissioning trust fundsfund was $532 million.

As discussed in Note 16 to the financial statements herein, in August 2019, Entergy completed the transfer of the Registrant Subsidiaries, an offsetting amountPilgrim plant to Holtec. As part of unrealized gains/(losses) will continuethe transaction, Entergy transferred the Pilgrim decommissioning trust fund to be recorded in other regulatory liabilities/assets.Holtec. The disposition-date fair value of the decommissioning trust fund was approximately $1,030 million.


Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value.  Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets.  For the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun, Entergy Louisiana records an offsetting amount in other deferred credits for the unrealized trust earnings not currently expected to be needed to decommission the plant.  Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment.  Accordingly, unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on the equity securities in the trust funds are recognized in earnings. Unrealized gains recorded on the available-for-sale debt securities in the trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity.  Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the available-for-sale debt securities in the trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other than temporary and therefore recorded in earnings. A portion of Entergy’s decommissioning trust funds are held in a wholly-owned registered investment company, and unrealized gains and losses on both the equity and debt securities

88

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

held in the registered investment company are recognized in earnings. Generally, Entergy records gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.


The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 20182019 on equity securities still held as of September 30, 20182019 were $369$17 million and $464$491 million, respectively. The equity securities

86

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index. The debt securities are generally held in individual government and credit issuances.


The available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are summarized as follows:
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2018      
Debt Securities (a) 
$2,448
 
$10
 
$51
       
2017      
Equity Securities 
$4,662
 
$2,131
 
$1
Debt Securities 2,550
 44
 16
Total 
$7,212
 
$2,175
 
$17
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2019      
Debt Securities (a) 
$2,462
 
$114
 
$2
       
2018      
Debt Securities (a) 
$2,495
 
$19
 
$35


(a)Debt securities presented herein do not include the $397$506 million and $389 million of debt securities held in the wholly-owned registered investment company as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, which are not accounted for as available-for-sale.


The unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of $472$16 million as of September 30, 2019 and ($1) million as of December 31, 2017 for equity securities, and ($6) million as of September 30, 2018 and $7 million as of December 31, 2017 for debt securities. The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $2,489$2,362 million as of September 30, 20182019 and $2,539$2,511 million as of December 31, 2017.2018.  As of September 30, 2018,2019, available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.36%3.15%, an average duration of approximately 5.985.63 years, and an average maturity of approximately 10.49.02 years.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2018:2019:
 Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions) (In Millions)
Less than 12 months 
$1,691
 
$33
 
$236
 
$2
More than 12 months 357
 18
 67
 
Total 
$2,048
 
$51
 
$303
 
$2

89

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2017:2018:
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$652
 
$9
More than 12 months782
 26
Total
$1,434
 
$35



87

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$8
 
$1
 
$1,099
 
$7
More than 12 months
 
 265
 9
Total
$8
 
$1
 
$1,364
 
$16


The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$165
 
$199
1 year - 5 years870
 1,066
5 years - 10 years636
 544
10 years - 15 years89
 77
15 years - 20 years98
 78
20 years+604
 531
Total
$2,462
 
$2,495

 2018 2017
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$119
 
$74
1 year - 5 years934
 902
5 years - 10 years628
 812
10 years - 15 years108
 147
15 years - 20 years92
 100
20 years+567
 515
Total
$2,448
 
$2,550


During the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $2,377$407 million and $440$2,377 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, gross gains of $4$11 million and $9$4 million, respectively, and gross losses of $15$0.4 million and $2$15 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


During the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $4,178$1,133 million and $1,903$4,178 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, gross gains of $6$20 million and $79$6 million, respectively, and gross losses of $37$3 million and $9$37 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds related to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants as of September 30, 20182019 are $509$534 million for Indian Point 1, $644$676 million for Indian Point 2, $835$893 million for Indian Point 3, $476and $492 million for Palisades, $1,081 million for Pilgrim, and $554 million for Vermont Yankee.Palisades. The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds related to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants as of December 31, 20172018 are $491$471 million for Indian Point 1, $621$598 million for Indian Point 2, $798$781 million for Indian Point 3, $458$444 million for Palisades, $1,068$1,028 million for Pilgrim, and $613$532 million for Vermont Yankee. The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds for the Registrant Subsidiaries’ nuclear plants are detailed below.


Entergy Arkansas


Entergy Arkansas holds equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are summarized as follows:

  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2019      
Debt Securities 
$407.7
 
$11.8
 
$0.9
       
2018      
Debt Securities 
$381.3
 
$0.6
 
$8.2


The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $396.8 million as of September 30, 2019 and $389 million as of December 31, 2018.  As of September 30, 2019, available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon

9088

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2018      
Debt Securities 
$378.5
 
$0.2
 
$10.9
       
2017      
Equity Securities 
$596.7
 
$354.9
 
$—
Debt Securities 348.2
 2.1
 3.0
Total 
$944.9
 
$357.0
 
$3.0

The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $389.2 million as of September 30, 2018 and $349.1 million as of December 31, 2017.  As of September 30, 2018, available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 2.68%2.78%, an average duration of approximately 4.65.57 years, and an average maturity of approximately 6.478.13 years.


The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 20182019 on equity securities still held as of September 30, 20182019 were $37.8$2.6 million and $46$96.5 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2018:2019:
 Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions) (In Millions)
Less than 12 months 
$259.7
 
$6.8
 
$51.5
 
$0.8
More than 12 months 78.2
 4.1
 21.0
 0.1
Total 
$337.9
 
$10.9
 
$72.5
 
$0.9


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of the available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2017:2018:
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$65.8
 
$0.5
More than 12 months231.1
 7.7
Total
$296.9
 
$8.2

 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$168.0
 
$1.2
More than 12 months
 
 41.4
 1.8
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$209.4
 
$3.0


91

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$50.3
 
$32.5
1 year - 5 years120.4
 170.3
5 years - 10 years144.5
 114.0
10 years - 15 years24.3
 10.3
15 years - 20 years14.2
 8.1
20 years+54.0
 46.1
Total
$407.7
 
$381.3

 2018 2017
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$40.8
 
$13.0
1 year - 5 years174.4
 123.4
5 years - 10 years115.6
 180.6
10 years - 15 years10.6
 4.8
15 years - 20 years5.8
 3.4
20 years+31.3
 23.0
Total
$378.5
 
$348.2


During the three months endedSeptember 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $137.9$45.5 million and $51.9$137.9 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, gross gains of $0.01$2 million and $0.04 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.6 million and $0.5 thousand, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $259.3 million and $219.2 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, gross gains of $0.1 million and $11.7 million, respectively, and gross losses of $3 million and $0.2$0.01 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, gross losses of $0.6 million related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings. During the three months endedSeptember 30, 2019, there were no gross losses.



89

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2019 and 2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $78.7 million and $259.3 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, gross gains of $2.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.1 million and $3 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

Entergy Louisiana


Entergy Louisiana holds equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are summarized as follows:
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2019      
Debt Securities 
$593.4
 
$32.6
 
$0.3
       
2018      
Debt Securities 
$532.9
 
$4.1
 
$6.0

  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2018      
Debt Securities 
$520.5
 
$2.0
 
$9.3
       
2017      
Equity Securities 
$818.3
 
$461.2
 
$—
Debt Securities 493.8
 10.9
 3.6
Total 
$1,312.1
 
$472.1
 
$3.6


The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $527.8$561 million as of September 30, 20182019 and $490$534.8 million as of December 31, 2017.2018.  As of September 30, 2018,2019, the available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.07%3.85%, an average duration of approximately 6.746.53 years, and an average maturity of approximately 13.7513.11 years.


The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 20182019 on equity securities still held as of September 30, 20182019 were $55$6 million and $66.3 million, respectively. The equity securities

92

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2018:
  Debt Securities
  
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
Less than 12 months 
$355.6
 
$5.8
More than 12 months 74.0
 3.5
Total 
$429.6
 
$9.3

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of the available-for-sale securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2017:
 Equity Securities Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$135.3
 
$1.1
More than 12 months
 
 84.4
 2.5
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$219.7
 
$3.6

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:
 2018 2017
 (In Millions)
less than 1 year
$22.4
 
$23.2
1 year - 5 years122.0
 122.8
5 years - 10 years117.9
 109.3
10 years - 15 years37.7
 52.7
15 years - 20 years41.3
 50.7
20 years+179.2
 135.1
Total
$520.5
 
$493.8

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $773.9 million and $50.5 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, gross gains of $1.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, and gross losses of $3.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $943.3 million and $176.1 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, gross gains of $2.5 million and $7.9 million, respectively, and gross losses of $4.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

93

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


System Energy

System Energy holds equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2018      
Debt Securities 
$359.2
 
$0.9
 
$7.1
       
2017      
Equity Securities 
$575.2
 
$308.6
 
$—
Debt Securities 330.5
 4.2
 1.2
Total 
$905.7
 
$312.8
 
$1.2

The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $365.5 million as of September 30, 2018 and $327.5 million as of December 31, 2017.  As of September 30, 2018, available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 2.95%, an average duration of approximately 6.2 years, and an average maturity of approximately 9.08 years.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 on equity securities still held as of September 30, 2018 were $35.9 million and $43.8$137.2 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2018:2019:
 Debt Securities
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions) (In Millions)
Less than 12 months 
$267.6
 
$5.2
 
$49.3
 
$0.3
More than 12 months 34.3
 1.9
 12.9
 
Total 
$301.9
 
$7.1
 
$62.2
 
$0.3




9490

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The fair value and gross unrealized losses of the available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2017:2018:
Equity Securities Debt Securities
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
 
$—
 
$196.9
 
$1.0

$170.1
 
$2.1
More than 12 months
 
 10.4
 0.2
145.8
 3.9
Total
$—
 
$—
 
$207.3
 
$1.2

$315.9
 
$6.0


The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 are as follows:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Millions)(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$2.2
 
$4.1
Less than 1 year
$56.6
 
$31.1
1 year - 5 years195.4
 173.0
138.2
 130.5
5 years - 10 years78.2
 78.5
118.4
 111.0
10 years - 15 years5.6
 1.0
34.7
 29.0
15 years - 20 years11.0
 6.9
45.0
 37.1
20 years+66.8
 67.0
200.5
 194.2
Total
$359.2
 
$330.5

$593.4
 
$532.9


During the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $157.8$59.7 million and $54.6$773.9 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, gross gains of $6.5 thousand$2.5 million and $0.2$1.9 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.3 million$29 thousand and $0.2$3.6 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.


During the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $357.2$155.4 million and $308.1$943.3 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, gross gains of $0.3$4.2 million and $0.7$2.5 million, respectively, and gross losses of $4.8$0.2 million and $1.5$4.8 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.



91

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

System Energy

System Energy holds equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:
  
Fair
Value
 
Total
Unrealized
Gains
 
Total
Unrealized
Losses
  (In Millions)
2019      
Debt Securities 
$395.3
 
$19.7
 
$0.1
       
2018      
Debt Securities 
$364.2
 
$2.9
 
$5.8

The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities was $375.6 million as of September 30, 2019 and $367.1 million as of December 31, 2018.  As of September 30, 2019, available-for-sale debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.09%, an average duration of approximately 6.84 years, and an average maturity of approximately 9.88 years.

The unrealized gains/(losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 on equity securities still held as of September 30, 2019 were $2.5 million and $91.8 million, respectively. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2019:
  
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months 
$38.8
 
$0.1
More than 12 months 4.3
 
Total 
$43.1
 
$0.1

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2018:
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 (In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$89.7
 
$2.4
More than 12 months79.8
 3.4
Total
$169.5
 
$5.8


92

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$11.2
 
$22.8
1 year - 5 years187.7
 188.0
5 years - 10 years92.7
 73.4
10 years - 15 years3.0
 5.2
15 years - 20 years5.9
 10.2
20 years+94.8
 64.6
Total
$395.3
 
$364.2

During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $108.6 million and $157.8 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, gross gains of $1.7 million and $6.5 thousand, respectively, and gross losses of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, proceeds from the dispositions of available-for-sale securities amounted to $238.4 million and $357.2 million, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, gross gains of $3.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.6 million and $4.8 million, respectively, related to available-for-sale securities were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.

Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains and losses


Entergy evaluates the available-for-sale debt securities in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear decommissioning trust funds with unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred.  The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs.  Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss).  Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debt securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 2017.2018.  Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments. 




95

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 10.  INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


See “Income Tax Audits” and “Other Tax Matters” in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax audits, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and other income tax matters involving Entergy. The following are updates to that discussion.


2012-2013 IRS Audit

The IRS completed its examination of the 2012 and 2013 tax years and issued its 2012-2013 Revenue Agent Report (RAR) in June 2018. Entergy agreed to all proposed adjustments contained in the RAR. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries recorded the effects of these adjustments in June 2018.

As a result of the issuance of the RAR, Entergy Louisiana was able to recognize previously unrecognized tax benefits of $52 million related to the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita contingent sharing obligation associated with the Louisiana Act 55 financing.

The conclusion and settlement of the IRS audit described above caused a decrease in Entergy Louisiana’s balance of unrecognized tax benefits, which changed from $926 million as of December 31, 2017 to $855 million as of September 30, 2018, net of carryovers for losses and credits. The reduction of unrecognized tax benefits was primarily recorded in the second quarter 2018 with no significant additional changes to Entergy Louisiana’s unrecognized tax benefit balance recognized during the third quarter 2018.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act limits the deduction for net business interest expense in certain circumstances. The limitation does not apply to interest expense allocable to the Utility. In Notice 2018-28 released on April 2, 2018, the IRS announced that it intends to issue proposed regulations that will provide guidance to assist taxpayers in complying with the new interest provisions under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The notice provides general and limited information of the IRS’s interpretation regarding methodologies that could be used for the allocation of the interest expense limitation. As a result of the new provision contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Entergy recorded limitations in 2018 which did not have a material effect on financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

For a discussion of proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy’s regulators to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, see Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K.


During the second and third quarters ofquarter 2018, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans and System EnergyRegistrant Subsidiaries began returning unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes, associated with the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, to their customers through rate riders

93

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

and other means approved by each Registrant Subsidiary’stheir respective regulatory commission.commissions. Return of the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes results in a reduction in the regulatory liability for income taxes and a corresponding reduction in income tax expense. This has a significant effect on the effective tax rate for the period as compared to the statutory tax rate. In the third quarter 2018 theThe return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes reduced Entergy’s and the Registrant Subsidiaries’ regulatory liability for income taxes as follows:
 
Three Months
Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Millions)
Entergy
$96
 
$283
 
$219
 
$562
Entergy Arkansas
$41
 
$153
 
$99
 
$260
Entergy Louisiana
$17
 
$55
 
$31
 
$86
Entergy Mississippi
$—
 
$32
 
$—
 
$161
Entergy New Orleans
$7
 
$9
 
$9
 
$9
Entergy Texas
$31
 
$—
 
$73
 
$—
System Entergy
$—
 
$34
 
$7
 
$46


Other Tax Matters

In April 2019 the state of Arkansas enacted corporate income tax law changes that phase in an Arkansas tax rate reduction from the current rate of 6.5% to 6.2% in 2021 and 5.9% in 2022.  The rate reduction will eventually reduce Entergy Arkansas’s combined federal and state applicable tax rate by less than 0.5% once fully adopted.  As a result of the rate reduction, Entergy Arkansas $153 million; Entergy Louisiana, $55 million; Entergy Mississippi, $32 million; Entergy New Orleans, $9 million; and System Energy, $34 million. In the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes reduced the Registrant Subsidiaries’recorded a regulatory liability for income taxes as follows:of approximately $25 million which includes a tax gross-up related to the treatment of income taxes in the ratemaking formula. The Arkansas tax law enactment also phases in an increase to the net operating loss carryover period from five to ten years.

In September 2019, Entergy Utility Holding Company, LLC and its regulated, wholly owned subsidiaries including Entergy Arkansas, $260 million; Entergy Louisiana, $86 million; Entergy Mississippi, $161 million;and Entergy New Orleans, $9 million;became eligible to and System Energy, $46 million.joined the Entergy Corporation consolidated federal income tax group.  Additionally, in September 2019, Entergy Texas issued $35 million of 5.375% Series A preferred stock with a liquidation value of $25 per share resulting in the disaffiliation and de-consolidation of Entergy Texas from the consolidated federal income tax return of Entergy Corporation.  These changes will not affect the accrual or allocation of income taxes for the Registrant Subsidiaries. See Note 3 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the preferred stock issuance.



Vermont Yankee

The Vermont Yankee transaction resulted in Entergy generating a net deferred tax asset in January 2019.  The deferred tax asset could not be fully realized by Entergy in the first quarter of 2019; accordingly, Entergy accrued a net tax expense of $29 million on the disposition of Vermont Yankee. See Note 16 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the Vermont Yankee transaction.



9694

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements herein, the unopposed settlement of Entergy Texas’s 2018 rate case, if approved by the PUCT, establishes the amounts of protected and unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes that Entergy Texas will return to customers. As of September 30, 2018, Entergy Texas’s regulatory liability for protected excess accumulated deferred income taxes was $269 million and its regulatory liability for unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes was $201 million.
Other Tax Matters

In the third quarter 2018, Entergy completed a restructuring of the investment holdings in one of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plant decommissioning trusts that resulted in an adjustment to tax basis for the trust. The accounting standards provide that a taxable temporary difference does not exist if the tax law provides a means by which an amount can be recovered without incurrence of tax. The restructuring allows Entergy to recover assets from the trust without incurring tax. As such, the tax basis recognized resulted in the reversal of a deferred tax liability and reduction of income tax expense of approximately $107 million.

A state income tax audit involving Entergy Wholesale Commodities was concluded during the third quarter 2018. Upon conclusion of the audit, subsidiaries within Entergy Wholesale Commodities reversed a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions totaling approximately $23 million, net of tax and interest paid.



NOTE 11.  PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable


Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at September 30, 20182019 are $255$306 million for Entergy, $27.8$41.7 million for Entergy Arkansas, $80.1$74 million for Entergy Louisiana, $8.9$14.7 million for Entergy Mississippi, $18.7$13.9 million for Entergy New Orleans, $13.9$81.6 million for Entergy Texas, and $38.1$24.6 million for System Energy.  Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at December 31, 20172018 are $368$311 million for Entergy, $58.8$35.7 million for Entergy Arkansas, $160.4$104.6 million for Entergy Louisiana, $17.1$13.6 million for Entergy Mississippi, $2.5$5.8 million for Entergy New Orleans, $32.8$55.6 million for Entergy Texas, and $33.9$26.3 million for System Energy.




NOTE 12.  VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facilities and commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt.

System Energy is considered to hold a variable interest in the lessor from which it leases an undivided interest representing approximately 11.5% of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant. System Energy is the lessee under this arrangement, which is described in more detail in Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. System Energy made payments on its lease,under this arrangement, including interest, of $8.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 20182019 and in the three months ended September 30, 2017.2018. System Energy made payments on its lease,under this arrangement, including interest, of $17.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and in the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018.






9795

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


NOTE 13.  REVENUE RECOGNITION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


Revenue Recognition

Entergy implemented ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” effective January 1, 2018. Topic 606 requires entities to “recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” The ASU details a five-step model that should be followed to achieve the core principle. This accounting was applied to all contracts using the modified retrospective method, which requires an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of adopting the standard as of the effective date. Because the standard did not result in any material change in how Entergy recognizes revenue, however, no adjustment to retained earnings was required. Similarly, there was no effect on revenues recognized under Topic 606 for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Revenues from electric service and the sale of natural gas are recognized when services are transferredSee Note 19 to the customerfinancial statements in an amount equal to what Entergy has the right to bill the customer because this amount represents the valueForm 10-K for a discussion of services provided to customers.

revenue recognition.  Entergy’s total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 wereare as follows:
 2018
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Utility:        
Residential 
$1,138,744
 
$2,799,539
 
$1,154,455
 
$1,138,744
Commercial 693,760
 1,871,380
 722,334
 693,760
Industrial 682,823
 1,904,828
 686,122
 682,823
Governmental 60,647
 173,949
 61,697
 60,647
Total billed retail 2,575,974
 6,749,696
 2,624,608
 2,575,974
        
Sales for resale (a) 76,247
 214,984
 63,082
 76,247
Other electric revenues (b) 42,847
 289,668
 115,352
 42,847
Non-customer revenues (c) 2,819
 22,026
 9,892
 2,819
Total electric revenues 2,697,887
 7,276,374
 2,812,934
 2,697,887
        
Natural gas 26,352
 112,990
 27,269
 26,352
        
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:        
Competitive businesses sales (a) 407,763
 1,148,460
 282,420
 407,763
Non-customer revenues (c) (27,683) (40,854) 17,952
 (27,683)
Total competitive businesses 380,080
 1,107,606
 300,372
 380,080
        
Total operating revenues 
$3,104,319
 
$8,496,970
 
$3,140,575
 
$3,104,319





9896

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Entergy’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
Utility:    
Residential 
$2,727,367
 
$2,799,539
Commercial 1,871,416
 1,871,380
Industrial 1,928,857
 1,904,828
Governmental 172,280
 173,949
    Total billed retail 6,699,920
 6,749,696
     
Sales for resale (a) 222,834
 214,984
Other electric revenues (b) 326,771
 289,668
Non-customer revenues (c) 30,158
 22,026
    Total electric revenues 7,279,683
 7,276,374
     
Natural gas 112,916
 112,990
     
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:    
Competitive businesses sales (a) 923,288
 1,148,460
Non-customer revenues (c) 100,480
 (40,854)
    Total competitive businesses 1,023,768
 1,107,606
     
    Total operating revenues 
$8,416,367
 
$8,496,970


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
2019 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Residential 
$253,627
 
$426,012
 
$177,785
 
$81,468
 
$215,563
Commercial 162,564
 277,071
 131,596
 56,430
 94,673
Industrial 156,024
 376,595
 44,054
 8,613
 100,836
Governmental 5,907
 18,731
 12,551
 19,030
 5,478
    Total billed retail 578,122

1,098,409

365,986

165,541

416,550
           
Sales for resale (a) 58,953
 81,664
 9,569
 6,876
 16,704
Other electric revenues (b) 47,085
 37,521
 20,499
 2,537
 9,177
Non-customer revenues (c) 3,366
 4,280
 2,678
 1,784
 446
    Total electric revenues 687,526

1,221,874

398,732

176,738

442,877
           
Natural gas 
 9,803
 
 17,466
 
           
    Total operating revenues 
$687,526


$1,231,677


$398,732


$194,204


$442,877


97

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Residential 
$250,081
 
$408,680
 
$170,258
 
$86,014
 
$223,711
Commercial 119,950
 272,985
 126,987
 62,428
 111,409
Industrial 126,079
 393,884
 44,383
 9,655
 108,823
Governmental 4,445
 17,566
 11,488
 20,364
 6,785
    Total billed retail 500,555
 1,093,115
 353,116
 178,461
 450,728
           
Sales for resale (a) 60,338
 71,634
 7,876
 4,863
 23,290
Other electric revenues (b) 4,446
 34,220
 4,079
 (1,107) 2,735
Non-customer revenues (c) 3,060
 (2,691) 2,663
 1,947
 478
    Total electric revenues 568,399
 1,196,278
 367,734
 184,164
 477,231
           
Natural gas 
 10,334
 
 16,018
 
           
    Total operating revenues 
$568,399
 
$1,206,612
 
$367,734
 
$200,182
 
$477,231



The Registrant Subsidiaries’ total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
2019 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Residential 
$621,208
 
$980,443
 
$423,395
 
$192,165
 
$510,156
Commercial 412,697
 715,983
 331,785
 156,152
 254,799
Industrial 396,515
 1,108,193
 120,490
 24,353
 279,306
Governmental 15,776
 53,547
 33,108
 53,916
 15,933
    Total billed retail 1,446,196
 2,858,166
 908,778
 426,586
 1,060,194
           
Sales for resale (a) 213,038
 248,827
 19,377
 25,680
 48,251
Other electric revenues (b) 107,599
 130,269
 47,887
 8,093
 37,329
Non-customer revenues (c) 9,434
 15,564
 7,671
 4,414
 1,157
    Total electric revenues 1,776,267
 3,252,826
 983,713
 464,773
 1,146,931
           
Natural gas 
 44,498
 
 68,418
 
           
    Total operating revenues 
$1,776,267
 
$3,297,324
 
$983,713
 
$533,191
 
$1,146,931


98

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

2018 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New
Orleans
 
Entergy
Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Residential 
$644,735
 
$972,113
 
$451,331
 
$208,821
 
$522,539
Commercial 334,325
 719,652
 354,799
 171,224
 291,380
Industrial 335,529
 1,114,898
 133,012
 26,493
 294,896
Governmental 12,859
 51,581
 33,788
 56,503
 19,218
    Total billed retail 1,327,448
 2,858,244
 972,930
 463,041
 1,128,033
           
Sales for resale (a) 179,637
 272,690
 21,645
 24,390
 71,828
Other electric revenues (b) 98,571
 124,749
 35,055
 7,404
 28,468
Non-customer revenues (c) 8,372
 7,390
 7,536
 4,749
 1,328
    Total electric revenues 1,614,028
 3,263,073
 1,037,166
 499,584
 1,229,657
           
Natural gas 
 45,671
 
 67,319
 
           
    Total operating revenues 
$1,614,028
 
$3,308,744
 
$1,037,166
 
$566,903
 
$1,229,657


(a)Sales for resale and competitive businesses sales include day-ahead sales of energy in a market administered by an ISO. These sales represent financially binding commitments for the sale of physical energy the next day. These sales are adjusted to actual power generated and delivered in the real time market. Given the short duration of these transactions, Entergy does not consider them to be derivatives subject to fair value adjustments, and includes them as part of customer revenues.

99

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

duration of these transactions, Entergy does not consider them to be derivatives subject to fair value adjustments, and includes them as part of customer revenues.
(b)Other electric revenues consist primarily of transmission and ancillary services provided to participants of an ISO-administered market and unbilled revenue.
(c)Non-customer revenues include the settlement of financial hedges, occasional sales of inventory, alternative revenue programs, provisions for revenue subject to refund, and late fees.


Electric Revenues

Entergy’s primary source of revenue is from retail electric sales sold under tariff rates approved by regulators in its various jurisdictions. Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas generate, transmit, and distribute electric power primarily to retail customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Energy is provided on demand throughout the month, measured by a meter located at the customer’s property. Approved rates vary by customer class due to differing requirements of the customers and market factors involved in fulfilling those requirements. Entergy issues monthly bills to customers at rates approved by regulators for power and related services provided during the previous billing cycle.

To the extent that deliveries have occurred but a bill has not been issued, Entergy’s Utility operating companies record an estimate for energy delivered since the latest billings. The Utility operating companies calculate the estimate based upon several factors including billings through the last billing cycle in a month, actual generation in the month, historical line loss factors, and market prices of power in the respective jurisdiction. The inputs are revised as needed to approximate actual usage and cost. Each month, estimated unbilled amounts are recorded as unbilled revenue and accounts receivable, and the prior month’s estimate is reversed. Price and volume differences resulting from factors such as weather affect the calculation of unbilled revenues from one period to the other. This may result in variability of reported revenues from one period to the next as prior estimates are reversed and new estimates recorded.

Entergy may record revenue based on rates that are subject to refund. Such revenues are reduced by estimated refund amounts when Entergy believes refunds are probable based on the status of rate proceedings as of the date financial statements are prepared. Because these refunds will be made through a reduction in future rates, and not as a reduction in bills previously issued, they are presented as non-customer revenue in the table above.

System Energy’s only source of revenue is the sale of electric power and capacity generated from its 90% interest in the Grand Gulf nuclear plant to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. System Energy issues monthly bills to its affiliated customers equal to its actual operating costs plus a return on common equity approved by the FERC.

Entergy’s Utility operating companies also sell excess power not needed for its own customers, primarily through transactions with MISO, a regional transmission organization that maintains functional control over the combined transmission systems of its members and manages one of the largest energy markets in the U.S. In the MISO market, Entergy offers its generation and bids its load into the market. MISO settles these offers and bids based on locational marginal prices. These represent pricing for energy at a given location based on a market clearing price that takes into account physical limitations on the transmission system, generation, and demand throughout the MISO region. MISO evaluates each market participant’s energy offers and demand bids to economically and reliably dispatch the entire MISO system. Entergy nets purchases and sales within the MISO market and reports in operating revenues when in a net selling position and in operating expenses when in a net purchasing position.

Natural Gas

Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans also distribute natural gas to retail customers in and around Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and the City of New Orleans, including Algiers, respectively. Gas transferred to customers is measured by a meter at the customer’s property. Entergy issues monthly invoices to customers at rates approved by regulators for the volume of gas transferred to date.

100

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Competitive Businesses Revenues

The Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment derives almost all of its revenue from sales of electric power and capacity produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers. The majority of Entergy Wholesale Commodities revenues are from Entergy’s nuclear power plants located in the northern United States. Entergy issues monthly invoices to the counterparties for these electric sales at the respective contracted or ISO market rate of electricity and related services provided during the previous month.

Most of the Palisades nuclear plant output is sold under a 15-year PPA with Consumers Energy, executed as part of the acquisition of the plant in 2007 and expiring in 2022. The PPA prices are for a set price per MWh and escalate each year, up to $61.50/MWh in 2022. Entergy issues monthly invoices to Consumers Energy for electric sales based on the actual output of electricity and related services provided during the previous month at the contract price. Additionally, as the PPA pricing was considered below-market at the time of acquisition, a liability was recorded for the fair value of the below-market PPA, and is being amortized to revenue over the life of the agreement.

Practical Expedients and Exceptions

Entergy has elected not to disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected term of one year or less, or for revenue recognized in an amount equal to what Entergy has the right to bill the customer for services performed.

Most of Entergy’s contracts, except in a few cases where there are defined minimums or stated terms, are on demand. This results in customer bills that vary each month based on an approved tariff and usage. Entergy imposes monthly or annual minimum requirements on some customers primarily as credit and cost recovery guarantees and not as pricing for unsatisfied performance obligations. These minimums typically expire after the initial term or when specified costs have been recovered. The minimum amounts are part of each month’s bill and recognized as revenue accordingly. Some of the subsidiaries within the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment have operations and maintenance services contracts that have fixed components and terms longer than one year. The total fixed consideration related to these unsatisfied performance obligations, however, is not material to Entergy revenues.

Recovery of Fuel Costs

Entergy’s Utility operating companies’ rate schedules include either fuel adjustment clauses or fixed fuel factors, which allow either current recovery in billings to customers or deferral of fuel costs until the costs are billed to customers. Where the fuel component of revenues is based on a pre-determined fuel cost (fixed fuel factor), the fuel factor remains in effect until changed as part of a general rate case, fuel reconciliation, or fixed fuel factor filing. System Energy’s operating revenues are intended to recover from Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans operating expenses and capital costs attributable to Grand Gulf. The capital costs are based on System Energy’s common equity funds allocable to its net investment in Grand Gulf, plus System Energy’s effective interest cost for its debt allocable to its investment in Grand Gulf.

Taxes Imposed on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Governmental authorities assess taxes that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, including, but not limited to, sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes.  Entergy presents these taxes on a net basis, excluding them from revenues.



101

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 14. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)


See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. The following are updates to that discussion.


In the first quarter 2018,2019, Entergy Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for ANO 1 and ANO 2 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimates resulted in a $126.2 million increase in its decommissioning cost liabilities, along with corresponding increases in the related asset retirement cost assets that will be depreciated over the remaining lives of the units.

In the second quarter 2019, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for River BendWaterford 3 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in an $85.4a $147.5 million increase in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding increase in the related asset retirement cost asset that will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of the unit.


99

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 15. LEASES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy implemented ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” effective January 1, 2019. The ASU’s core principle is that “a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases.” The ASU considers that “all leases create an asset and a liability,” and accordingly requires recording the assets and liabilities related to all leases with a term greater than 12 months. Concurrent with the implementation of ASU 2016-02, Entergy implemented ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842,” which provided Entergy the option to elect not to evaluate existing land easements that are not currently accounted for under the previous lease standard, and ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” which intended to simplify the transition requirement giving Entergy the option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at the date of adoption instead of at the earliest comparative period. In implementing these ASUs, Entergy elected the options provided in both ASU 2018-01 and ASU 2018-11. This accounting was applied to all lease agreements using the modified retrospective method, which required an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of adopting the standard as of the effective date, and when implemented with ASU 2018-11, allowed Entergy to recognize the leased assets and liabilities on its balance sheet beginning on January 1, 2019 without restating prior periods. In adopting the standard, in January 2019 Entergy recognized right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities totaling approximately $263 million, including $59 million for Entergy Arkansas, $51 million for Entergy Louisiana, $26 million for Entergy Mississippi, $7 million for Entergy New Orleans, and $16 million for Entergy Texas. Implementation of the standards had no material effect on consolidated net income; therefore, no adjustment to retained earnings was recorded. The adoption of the standards had no effect on cash flows.

General

As of September 30, 2019, Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries held operating and financing leases for fleet vehicles used in operations, real estate, and aircraft. Excluded from this are power purchase agreements not meeting the definition of a lease, nuclear fuel leases, and the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback which were determined not to be leases.

Leases have remaining terms of one year to 52 years. Real estate leases generally include at least one five-year renewal option; however, renewal is not typically considered reasonably certain unless Entergy or a Registrant Subsidiary makes significant leasehold improvements or other modifications which would hinder its ability to easily move. In certain of the lease agreements for fleet vehicles used in operations, Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries provide residual value guarantees to the lessor; however, due to the nature of the agreements and Entergy’s continuing relationship with the lessor, Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to renegotiate or refinance the leases prior to conclusion of the lease. As such, Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries do not believe it is probable that they will be required to pay anything pertaining to the residual value guarantee, and the lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are measured accordingly.

Entergy incurred the following total lease costs for the three months ended September 30, 2019:
(In Thousands)
Operating lease cost
$16,086
Financing lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets
$2,945
Interest on lease liabilities
$763

Of the lease costs disclosed above, Entergy had $15 thousand in short-term lease costs for the three months ended September 30, 2019.


100

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy incurred the following total lease costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2019:
(In Thousands)
Operating lease cost
$47,061
Financing lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets
$10,837
Interest on lease liabilities
$2,597


Of the lease costs disclosed above, Entergy had $15 thousand in short-term lease costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

The lease costs disclosed above materially approximate the cash flows used by Entergy for leases with all costs included within operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, except for the financing lease costs which are included in financing activities.

The Registrant Subsidiaries incurred the following lease costs for the three months ended September 30, 2019:
 Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi 
Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy Texas
 (In Thousands)
Operating lease cost
$3,306
 
$3,003
 
$1,752
 
$349
 
$1,074
Financing lease cost:         
Amortization of right-of-use assets
$621
 
$1,014
 
$369
 
$178
 
$335
Interest on lease liabilities
$105
 
$161
 
$65
 
$29
 
$54

Of the lease costs disclosed above, Entergy Louisiana had $15 thousand in short-term lease costs for the three months ended September 30, 2019.

The Registrant Subsidiaries incurred the following lease costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2019:
 Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi 
Entergy
New Orleans
 Entergy Texas
 (In Thousands)
Operating lease cost
$9,724
 
$8,854
 
$5,220
 
$1,058
 
$3,135
Financing lease cost:         
Amortization of right-of-use assets
$2,448
 
$4,014
 
$1,408
 
$696
 
$965
Interest on lease liabilities
$408
 
$612
 
$241
 
$114
 
$153


Of the lease costs disclosed above, Entergy Louisiana had $15 thousand in short-term lease costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

The lease costs disclosed above materially approximate the cash flows used by the Registrant Subsidiaries for leases with all costs included within operating activities on the respective Statements of Cash Flows, except for the financing lease costs which are included in financing activities.

101

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy has elected to account for short-term leases in accordance with policy options provided by accounting guidance; therefore, there are no related lease liabilities or right-of-use assets for the costs recognized above by Entergy or by its Registrant Subsidiaries in the table below.

Included within Property, Plant, and Equipment on Entergy’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2019 are $236 million related to operating leases and $60 million related to financing leases.

Included within Utility Plant on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ respective balance sheets at September 30, 2019 are the following amounts:
 Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi Entergy New Orleans Entergy Texas
 (In Thousands)
Operating leases
$49,503
 
$34,248
 
$18,149
 
$3,894
 
$13,074
Financing leases
$11,094
 
$16,795
 
$6,994
 
$2,913
 
$5,515


The following lease-related liabilities are recorded within the respective Other lines on Entergy’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2019:
(In Thousands)
Current liabilities:
Operating leases
$52,348
Financing leases
$11,482
Non-current liabilities:
Operating leases
$184,404
Financing leases
$53,252


The following lease-related liabilities are recorded within the respective Other lines on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ respective balance sheets at September 30, 2019:
 Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi Entergy New Orleans Entergy Texas
 (In Thousands)
Current liabilities:         
Operating leases
$10,662
 
$9,969
 
$6,137
 
$1,138
 
$3,427
Financing leases
$2,600
 
$3,860
 
$1,473
 
$626
 
$1,252
Non-current liabilities:        
Operating leases
$38,881
 
$24,289
 
$12,254
 
$2,755
 
$9,689
Financing leases
$8,665
 
$12,925
 
$5,521
 
$2,286
 
$4,221


The following information contains the weighted average remaining lease term in years and the weighted average discount rate for the operating and financing leases of Entergy at September 30, 2019:
Weighted average remaining lease terms:
Operating leases5.10
Financing leases6.79
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leases3.91%
Financing leases4.67%


102

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The following information contains the weighted average remaining lease term in years and the weighted average discount rate for the operating and financing leases of the Registrant Subsidiaries at September 30, 2019:
 Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi Entergy New Orleans Entergy Texas
  
Weighted average remaining lease terms:         
Operating leases6.09
 4.28
 4.65
 3.99
 4.49
Financing leases5.44
 5.41
 5.41
 5.72
 5.25
Weighted average discount rate:         
Operating leases3.75% 3.74% 3.77% 3.94% 3.86%
Financing leases3.75% 3.75% 3.71% 3.93% 3.84%


Maturity of the lease liabilities for Entergy as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:
Year Operating Leases Financing Leases
  (In Thousands)
     
Remainder for 2019 
$16,088
 
$3,608
2020 59,965
 13,521
2021 53,791
 11,973
2022 45,391
 10,775
2023 35,050
 9,664
Years thereafter 56,906
 26,889
Minimum lease payments 267,191
 76,430
Less: amount representing interest 30,438
 11,696
Present value of net minimum lease payments 
$236,753
 
$64,734



103

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Maturity of the lease liabilities for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:

Operating Leases
Year Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi Entergy New Orleans Entergy Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Remainder of 2019 
$3,168
 
$2,863
 
$1,968
 
$332
 
$1,022
2020 11,756
 10,518
 6,066
 1,196
 4,014
2021 9,911
 8,787
 4,937
 939
 3,279
2022 7,613
 6,068
 3,503
 659
 2,338
2023 6,341
 4,079
 1,376
 497
 1,994
Years thereafter 16,421
 4,702
 2,642
 729
 2,193
Minimum lease payments 55,210
 37,017
 20,492
 4,352
 14,840
Less: amount representing interest 5,667
 2,759
 2,101
 459
 1,724
Present value of net minimum lease payments 
$49,543
 
$34,258
 
$18,391
 
$3,893
 
$13,116

Financing Leases
Year Entergy Arkansas Entergy Louisiana Entergy Mississippi Entergy New Orleans Entergy Texas
  (In Thousands)
           
Remainder of 2019 
$713
 
$1,135
 
$429
 
$204
 
$375
2020 2,654
 4,191
 1,655
 660
 1,364
2021 2,258
 3,536
 1,490
 549
 1,171
2022 1,969
 3,096
 1,297
 499
 965
2023 1,728
 2,635
 1,078
 451
 827
Years thereafter 2,905
 3,818
 1,740
 881
 1,316
Minimum lease payments 12,227
 18,411
 7,689
 3,244
 6,018
Less: amount representing interest 961
 1,626
 695
 332
 545
Present value of net minimum lease payments 
$11,266
 
$16,785
 
$6,994
 
$2,912
 
$5,473


In allocating consideration in lease contracts to the lease and non-lease components, Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries have made the accounting policy election to combine lease and non-lease components related to fleet vehicles used in operations, fuel storage agreements, and purchased power agreements and to allocate the contract consideration to both lease and non-lease components for real estate leases.

In accordance with ASU 2018-11, below is the lease disclosure from Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.


104

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

General

As of December 31, 2018, Entergy had capital leases and non-cancelable operating leases for equipment, buildings, vehicles, and fuel storage facilities with minimum lease payments as follows (excluding power purchase agreement operating leases, nuclear fuel leases, and the Grand Gulf sale and leaseback transaction, all of which are discussed elsewhere):
 
Year
 
Operating
Leases
 
Capital
Leases
  (In Thousands)
2019 
$94,043
 
$2,887
2020 82,191
 2,887
2021 75,147
 2,887
2022 60,808
 2,887
2023 47,391
 2,887
Years thereafter 88,004
 16,117
Minimum lease payments 447,584
 30,552
Less:  Amount representing interest 
 8,555
Present value of net minimum lease payments 
$447,584
 
$21,997


Total rental expenses for all leases (excluding power purchase agreement operating leases, nuclear fuel leases, and the Grand Gulf and Waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions) amounted to $47.8 million in 2018, $53.1 million in 2017, and $44.4 million in 2016.

As of December 31, 2018, the Registrant Subsidiaries had non-cancelable operating leases for equipment, buildings, vehicles, and fuel storage facilities with minimum lease payments as follows (excluding power purchase agreement operating leases, nuclear fuel leases, and the Grand Gulf lease obligation, all of which are discussed elsewhere):

Operating Leases
 
 
Year
 
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
 
Entergy
Texas
  (In Thousands)
2019 
$20,421
 
$25,970
 
$9,344
 
$2,493
 
$5,744
2020 13,918
 21,681
 8,763
 2,349
 4,431
2021 11,931
 19,514
 7,186
 1,901
 3,625
2022 9,458
 15,756
 5,675
 1,314
 2,218
2023 7,782
 12,092
 2,946
 1,043
 1,561
Years thereafter 23,297
 22,003
 4,417
 2,323
 2,726
Minimum lease payments 
$86,807
 
$117,016
 
$38,331
 
$11,423
 
$20,305



105

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Rental Expenses
 
 
Year
 
 
Entergy
Arkansas
 
 
Entergy
Louisiana
 
 
Entergy
Mississippi
 
Entergy
New Orleans
 
 
Entergy
Texas
 
 
System
Energy
  (In Millions)
2018 
$6.2
 
$20.2
 
$4.6
 
$2.5
 
$3.1
 
$1.9
2017 
$7.5
 
$23.0
 
$5.6
 
$2.5
 
$3.4
 
$2.2
2016 
$8.0
 
$17.8
 
$4.0
 
$0.9
 
$2.8
 
$1.6


In addition to the above rental expense, railcar operating lease payments and oil tank facilities lease payments are recorded in fuel expense in accordance with regulatory treatment.  Railcar operating lease payments were $2.8 million in 2018, $4 million in 2017, and $3.4 million in 2016 for Entergy Arkansas and $0.4 million in 2018, $0.3 million in 2017, and $0.3 million in 2016 for Entergy Louisiana.  Oil tank facilities lease payments for Entergy Mississippi were $0.1 million in 2018, $1.6 million in 2017, and $1.6 million in 2016.

On January 1, 2019, Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” along with the practical expedients provided by ASU No. 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842,” and ASU No. 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.”  See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of ASU No. 2016-02.

Power Purchase Agreements

As of December 31, 2018, Entergy Wholesale Commodities plant owners will submit filingsTexas had a power purchase agreement that is accounted for as an operating lease under the accounting standards. The lease payments are recovered in fuel expense in accordance with regulatory treatment. The minimum lease payments under the power purchase agreement are as follows:
Year Entergy Texas (a) Entergy
  (In Thousands)
2019 
$31,159
 
$31,159
2020 31,876
 31,876
2021 32,609
 32,609
2022 10,180
 10,180
Minimum lease payments 
$105,824
 
$105,824

(a)Amounts reflect 100% of minimum payments. Under a separate contract, which expires May 31, 2022, Entergy Louisiana purchases 50% of the capacity and energy from the power purchase agreement from Entergy Texas.

Total capacity expense under the power purchase agreement accounted for as an operating lease at Entergy Texas was $30.5 million in 2018, $34.1 million in 2017, and $26.1 million in 2016.

Sales and Leaseback Transactions

Waterford 3 Lease Obligation

In 1989, in three separate but substantially identical transactions, Entergy Louisiana sold and leased back undivided interests in Waterford 3 for the aggregate sum of $353.6 million.  The leases were scheduled to expire in July 2017.  Entergy Louisiana was required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements.


106

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

In December 2015, Entergy Louisiana agreed to purchase the undivided interests in Waterford 3 that were previously being leased. The purchase was accomplished in a two-step transaction in which Entergy Louisiana first acquired the equity participant’s beneficial interest in the leased assets, followed by a termination of the leases and transfer of the leased assets to Entergy Louisiana when the outstanding lessor debt is paid.

In March 2016, Entergy Louisiana completed the first step in the two-step transaction by acquiring the equity participant’s beneficial interest in the leased assets. Entergy Louisiana paid $60 million in cash and $52 million through the issuance of a non-interest bearing collateral trust mortgage note, payable in installments through July 2017. Entergy Louisiana continued to make payments on the lessor debt that remained outstanding and which matured in January 2017. The combination of payments on the $52 million collateral trust mortgage note issued and the debt service on the lessor debt was equal in timing and amount to the remaining lease payments due from the closing of the transaction through the end of the lease term in July 2017.

Throughout the term of the lease, Entergy Louisiana had accrued a liability for the amount it expected to pay to retain the use of the undivided interests in Waterford 3 at the end of the lease term. Since the sale-leaseback transaction was accounted for as a financing transaction, the accrual of this liability was accounted for as additional interest expense. As of December 2015, the balance of this liability was $62.7 million. Upon entering into the agreement to purchase the equity participant’s beneficial interest in the undivided interests, Entergy Louisiana reduced the balance of the liability to $60 million, and recorded the $2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense. The $60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price in 2016.

As of December 31, 2016, Entergy Louisiana, in connection with the NRCWaterford 3 lease obligation, had a future minimum lease payment (reflecting an interest rate of 8.09%) of $57.5 million, including $2.3 million in interest, due January 2017 that was recorded as long-term debt.

In February 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to Entergy Louisiana.

Grand Gulf Lease Obligations

In 1988, in two separate but substantially identical transactions, System Energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in Grand Gulf for planned shutdown activitiesthe aggregate sum of $500 million.  The initial term of the leases expired in July 2015.  System Energy renewed the leases in December 2013 for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in July 2036. At the end of the new lease renewal terms, System Energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in Grand Gulf or renew the leases at fair market value.  In the event that System Energy does not renew or purchase the interests, System Energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of Grand Gulf’s capacity and energy.

System Energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements.  For financial reporting purposes, System Energy expenses the nuclear plants individually approachinterest portion of the lease obligation and begin decommissioning. the plant depreciation.  However, operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes.  Consistent with a recommendation contained in a FERC audit report, System Energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis, resulting in a 0 net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term.  The amount was a net regulatory liability of $55.6 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.


107

Table of Contents
Entergy Nuclear Generation Company expectsCorporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to file its Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR)Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2018, System Energy, in connection with the NRC inGrand Gulf sale and leaseback transactions, had future minimum lease payments that are recorded as long-term debt, as follows, which reflects the fourth quarter 2018 for the Pilgrim plant. As parteffect of the development of the PSDAR, Entergy obtained a revised decommissioning cost studyDecember 2013 renewal:
 Amount
 (In Thousands)
  
2019
$17,188
202017,188
202117,188
202217,188
202317,188
Years thereafter223,437
Total309,377
Less: Amount representing interest275,025
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$34,352



NOTE 16.  DISPOSITIONS (Entergy Corporation)

Vermont Yankee

As discussed in the third quarter 2018. The revised estimate resulted in a $117.5 million increase in the decommissioning cost liability and a corresponding impairment charge. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in January 2019, Entergy transferred 100% of the membership interests in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, the owner of the Vermont Yankee plant, to a subsidiary of NorthStar.

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee had an outstanding credit facility that was used to pay for dry fuel storage costs. This credit facility was guaranteed by Entergy Corporation. Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement Management, LLC, a discussionsubsidiary of impairmentEntergy, assumed the obligations under the credit facility. At the closing of the transaction, NorthStar caused Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, renamed NorthStar Vermont Yankee, to issue a $139 million promissory note to Vermont Yankee Asset Retirement Management. The amount of the note included the balance outstanding on the credit facility, as well as borrowing fees and costs incurred by Entergy in connection with the credit facility.

Upon closing of the transaction in January 2019, the Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust, along with the decommissioning obligation for the plant, was transferred to NorthStar. The Vermont Yankee spent fuel disposal contract was assigned to NorthStar as part of the transaction. The Vermont Yankee transaction resulted in Entergy generating a net deferred tax asset in January 2019.  The deferred tax asset could not be fully realized by Entergy in the first quarter of 2019; accordingly, Entergy accrued a net tax expense of $29 million on the disposition of Vermont Yankee. The transaction also resulted in other charges of $5.4 million ($4.2 million net-of-tax) in the first quarter 2019.

Pilgrim

In July 2018, Entergy entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Holtec International to sell to a Holtec subsidiary 100% of the equity interests in Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, the owner of the Pilgrim plant. In August 2019 the NRC approved the sale of the plant to Holtec. The transaction closed in August 2019 for a purchase price of $1,000 (subject to adjustments for net liabilities and other amounts). The sale included the transfer of the Pilgrim nuclear decommissioning trust and obligation for spent fuel management and plant decommissioning. The transaction resulted in a loss of $191 million ($156 million net-of-tax) in the third quarter 2019. The disposition-date fair value of the nuclear decommissioning trust fund was approximately $1,030 million and the disposition-date fair


108

Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

value of the asset retirement obligation was $837 million. The transaction also included property, plant, and equipment with a net book value of 0, materials and supplies, and prepaid assets.

________________


In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Entergy’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with peak periods occurring typically during the first and third quarters.  The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.




Part I, Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


See “Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis.


Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures


Disclosure Controls and Procedures


As of September 30, 2018,2019, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually “Registrant” and collectively the “Registrants”) management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting


Under the supervision and with the participation of each Registrants’ management, including its respective PEO and PFO, each Registrant evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 20182019 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.





ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS



Results of Operations


Net Income


Third Quarter2018 2019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net income increased $36.3$20.8 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax ratehigher retail electric price and higher net revenue, after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers which is offset in income taxes,volume/weather, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2017

Net income increased $102.2 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate and higher net revenue, after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers which is offset in income taxes, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses and lower other income.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Net Revenueincome decreased $8.6 million primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher interest expense, lower volume/weather, and higher other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by higher retail electric price.

Operating Revenues

Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:

2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$568.4
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(30.8
$481.8
)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(152.8111.4)
Volume/weather10.9

Retail electric price25.622.9

OtherVolume/weather(6.015.6)
2018 net revenue2019 operating revenues

$359.5687.5



Entergy Arkansas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a tax adjustment rider beginning in April 2018. In third quarter 2019, $41.4 million was returned to customers as compared to $152.8 million in third quarter 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenueoperating revenues in each period was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 548 GWh, or 9%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in demand from mid-size to small customers and a new customer in the primary metals industry.


104110

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2018 and an increase in the energy efficiency rider effective January 2018, each2019, as approved by the APSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period, partially offset by a decrease of 302 GWh, or 5%, in billed electricity usage, including a decrease in industrial usage primarily due to a decrease in small industrial sales.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$1,614.0
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(29.8
$1,178.6
)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(260.4161.7)
Retail electric price68.250.6

Volume/weather78.0(20.2
)
Other2019 operating revenues4.7
2018 net revenue

$1,069.11,776.3



Entergy Arkansas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a tax adjustment rider beginning in April 2018. In the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $98.7 million was returned to customers as compared to $260.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenueoperating revenues in each period was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2018 and an increase in the energy efficiency rider effective January 2018, each2019, as approved by the APSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increasea decrease of 1,478719 GWh, or 9%4%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of moreless favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increasea decrease in industrial usage. The increasedecrease in industrial usage is primarily due to a new customerdecrease in the primary metals industry and an increase in demand from mid-size to small customers.industrial sales.


Other Income Statement Variances


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $8.5 million in energy efficiency costs and an increase of $6.8 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to higher long-term service agreement costs and higher labor costs in the third quarter 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.


Other income increaseddecreased primarily due to changes in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund in third quarter 2018.activity.




105111

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $350 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds in March 2019.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Nuclear refueling outage expenses decreased primarily due to the amortization of lower costs associated with the most recent outages as compared to previous outages.

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:


an increase of $5.9 million due to spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $5.7 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance;
an increase of $14.2$3.8 million in energy efficiency costs;distribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services;
an increase of $11$3.3 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher long-term service agreement costs and higher labor costsscope of work performed during plant outages in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017;2018; and
lower nuclear insurance refunds of $3 million.
an
The increase was offset by a decrease of $9.3$12 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labora lower scope of work performed in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018 and a decrease of $5.9 million in energy efficiency costs including contract labor,due to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussiontiming of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.
recovery from customers.

The increase was partially offset by higher nuclear insurance refunds of $6.5 million.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.


Other income decreased primarily due to changes in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund in 2018 and 2017.activity.


Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $350 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds in March 2019 and the issuance of $250 million of 4.0%4.00% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2018 and the issuance of $220 million of 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2017.2018.


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rates were 4.5% for the third quarter 2019 and (13.1%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rate was (631.3%) for the third quarter 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes and the provision for uncertain tax positions. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The effective income tax rate was (286.4%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and

112

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rate was 39% for the third quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes.

The effective income tax rate was 39.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.


Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017. Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the

106

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy and Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flow


Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$6,216
 
$20,509

$119
 
$6,216
      
Cash flow provided by (used in):

  


  
Operating activities362,585
 367,551
576,612
 362,585
Investing activities(574,337) (667,841)(506,676) (574,337)
Financing activities427,318
 280,245
7,014
 427,318
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents215,566
 (20,045)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents76,950
 215,566
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$221,782
 
$464

$77,069
 
$221,782


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $5increased $214 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due toto:

a decrease in the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers.customers in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. TheAct;
a decrease was partially offset by:of $33.9 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2019;

a decrease of $33.8 million in pension contributions in 2019. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding; and
the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;costs.
the effect of favorable weather on billed sales;
the timing of payments to vendors;
a decrease of $18.1 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2018; and
a decrease113

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pensionSubsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and other postretirement benefits funding.Analysis


Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $93.5$67.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:

$66 million in funds held on deposit in 2017 for principal and interest payments due October 1, 2017;
a decrease of $32.5$43.3 million as a result of fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and service deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
a decrease of $42.6 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily as a result of work performed in 2018 on various ANO 1 and 2 outage projects;
a decrease of $17.8 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures due to a decrease in spending on various fossil-fueled generation projects in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018;
a decrease of $10.8 million in transmission construction expenditures due to a lower scope of work performed in 2019 on various nuclear projects in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017;projects; and
a decrease of $18.9$11.7 million in storm spending.information technology capital expenditures primarily due to lower spending in 2019 on critical infrastructure protection.


The decrease was partially offset by money pool activity.

Increasesan increase of $39.3 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to investment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool are a usedistribution system, including increased spending on advanced metering infrastructure, and an increase of $13.3 million in storm spending.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow and Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool increasedprovided by $13.4financing activities decreased $420.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The money

107

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Entergy Arkansas’s cash provided by financing activities increased $147.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


a $350 million capital contribution from Entergy Corporation in 2018 in anticipation of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers and upcoming planned capital investments;
the issuance of $250 million of 4.00% Series mortgage bonds in May 2018;
a common equity distribution of $115 million in 2019 in order to maintain the targeted capital structure;
net repayments of long-term borrowings of $29.3 million in 2019 compared to net long-term borrowings of $45.5 million in 2018 on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility; and
money pool activity.

The decrease was partially offset by the issuance of $250$350 million of 4.0%4.20% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2018 as compared to the issuance of $220 million of 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2017.

The increase was partially offset by:

money pool activity;March 2019 and
net repayments of short-term borrowings of $50 million on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2018 as compared to net short-term borrowings of $23.3 million on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2017.2018.


Decreases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool decreased by $182.7 million in 2019 compared to decreasing by $166.1 million in 2018 compared2018. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to increasing by $43.9 million in 2017.reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.



114

Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Capital Structure


Entergy Arkansas’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The decreaseincrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Arkansas is primarily due to the issuance of $350 million capital contribution from Entergy Corporationof mortgage bonds in 2018.

March 2019.
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Debt to capital51.9% 55.5%53.3% 52.0%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds(0.2%) (0.3%)(0.1%) (0.2%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)51.7% 55.2%53.2% 51.8%
Effect of subtracting cash(1.8%) %(0.5%) %
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)49.9% 55.2%52.7% 51.8%


(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings, financing lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Arkansas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy Arkansas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial

108

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

condition because net debt indicates Entergy Arkansas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resourcesin the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.


Entergy Arkansas is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $2.3$2.5 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investments in ANO 1 and 2; software and security; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy Arkansas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
September 30,
 2018
 
December 31,
2017
 
September 30,
 2017
 
December 31,
2016
(In Thousands)
$13,421 ($166,137) ($95,114) ($51,232)
September 30,
 2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
September 30,
 2018
 
December 31,
2017
(In Thousands)
$6,896 ($182,738) $13,421 ($166,137)


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.



115

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in September 2023.2024. Entergy Arkansas also has a $20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in April 2019.2020. The $150 million credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2018,2019, no cash borrowings and no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facilities. In addition, Entergy Arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of September 30, 2018,2019, a $1 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Arkansas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


The Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $80 million scheduled to expire in September 2021.  As of September 30, 2018, $70.42019, $30.3 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.

Searcy Solar Facility

In March 2019, Entergy Arkansas announced that it signed an agreement for the purchase of an approximately 100 MW to-be-constructed solar energy facility that will be sited on approximately 800 acres in White County near Searcy, Arkansas.  The purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  The project will be constructed by a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources.  Entergy Arkansas will purchase the facility upon completion and after the other purchase contingencies have been met.  Closing is expected to occur by the end of 2021. In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed a petition with the APSC seeking a finding that the transaction is in the public interest and requesting all necessary approvals. In September 2019 other parties filed testimony largely supporting the resource acquisition but disputing Entergy Arkansas’s proposed method of cost recovery. Entergy Arkansas filed its rebuttal testimony in October 2019. A hearing is scheduled in January 2020.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recoveryin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery.  The following are updates to that discussion.


109

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Retail Rates


20182019 Formula Rate Plan Filing


In July 2018,2019, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 20182019 formula rate plan filing to set its formula rate for the 20192020 calendar year. The filing showscontained an evaluation of Entergy Arkansas’s earnings for the projected earnedyear 2020 and a netting adjustment for the historical year 2018.  The total proposed formula rate plan rider revenue change designed to produce a target rate of return on common equity of 9.75% is $15.3 million, which is based upon a deficiency of approximately $61.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 test period to be below2020 projected year, netted with a credit of approximately $46.6 million in the formula2018 historical year netting adjustment. During 2018, Entergy Arkansas experienced higher-than expected sales volume, and actual costs were lower than forecasted.  These changes, coupled with a reduced income tax rate plan bandwidth. Additionally,resulting from the filing includesTax Cuts and Jobs Act, resulted in the first netting adjustment under the current formula rate plancredit for the historical test year 2017, which isnetting adjustment. In the fourth quarter 2018, Entergy Arkansas recorded a comparisonprovision of projected costs and sales approved$35.1 million that reflected the estimate of the historical year netting adjustment that was expected to be included in the 2016 formula rate plan filing2019 filing. In 2019, Entergy Arkansas recorded additional provisions totaling $11.5 million to actual 2017 costs and sales data. The filing includes a projected $73.4 millionrevenue deficiency for 2019 and a $95.6 million revenue deficiency forreflect the 2017 historical test year, for a total revenue requirement of $169 million for this filing. By operationupdated estimate of the formula rate plan, Entergy Arkansas’s recovery ofhistorical year netting adjustment included in the revenue requirement is subject to a four percent annual revenue constraint. Because Entergy Arkansas’s revenue requirement in this filing exceeds the constraint, the resulting increase is limited to four percent of total revenue, which is $65.4 million. The matter is scheduled for hearing in November 2018, and Entergy Arkansas requested that the APSC issue an order approving the proposed formula rate plan adjustment in December 2018, with the proposed formula rate plan adjustment effective with the first billing cycle of January 2019.2019 filing.   In October 20182019 other parties in the APSC staff and intervening partiesproceeding filed their errors and objections requesting certain adjustments to Entergy Arkansas’s 2018filing, which, if granted, would reduce or eliminate Entergy Arkansas’s proposed revenue change. Entergy Arkansas filed its response addressing the requested adjustments in October 2019. In its response, Entergy Arkansas accepted certain of the adjustments recommended by the General Staff of the APSC that would reduce the

116

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

proposed formula rate plan rider revenue change to $14 million. Entergy Arkansas disputed the remaining adjustments proposed by the parties. In October 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed a unanimous settlement agreement with the other parties in the proceeding seeking APSC approval of a revised total formula rate plan rider revenue change of $10.1 million. The proposed new formula rates would go into effect in January 2020. In its July 2019 formula rate plan filing, although no party proposed adjustments that would serve to reduce the requested revenue requirement below the annual revenue constraint. Entergy Arkansas also filed its rebuttalproposed to recover an $11.2 million regulatory asset, amortized over five years, associated with specific costs related to the APSC staff and intervenors in October 2018. Later in October 2018potential construction of scrubbers at the parties submitted motions, which are pendingWhite Bluff plant. While Entergy Arkansas does not concede that the regulatory asset does not have merit, for purposes of reaching a settlement amount on the total formula rate plan rider change Entergy Arkansas agreed not to include the amounts associated with the APSC, to approve a partial settlement as to certain factual issues and to brief certain contested legal issues.

Similar toWhite Bluff scrubber regulatory asset in the 2018 filing, the2019 formula rate plan filing that will be made in 2019 to set the formula rates for the 2020 calendar year will include a netting adjustment that will compare projected costs and sales for 2018 that were approved in the 2017 formula rate plan filing to actual 2018 costs and sales data. To the extent that Entergy Arkansas expects this netting adjustment to reflect actual 2018 revenues that are in excess of the actual costs for that year,or future filings. Entergy Arkansas will record a write off of the $11.2 million White Bluff scrubber regulatory provision in the fourth quarter 2018.asset.


Internal RestructuringProduction Cost Allocation Rider


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2017,In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas filed an application withits annual redetermination pursuant to the APSC seeking authorizationproduction cost allocation rider, which reflected a credit to undertakecustomers for the recovery of the true-up adjustment resulting from the 2018 over-recovered retail balance of $0.1 million and the recovery of a restructuring that would$4.2 million payment to Entergy Arkansas as a result of the FERC’s May 2018 decision in the transfer of substantially all2005 bandwidth proceeding, in which the FERC directed a compliance filing to be made that consisted of the assetscomprehensive recalculation of the bandwidth formula rate with true-up payments and operations of Entergy Arkansas to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. Entergy Arkansas also filed a notice withreceipts based on test period data for June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. The rates for the Missouri Public Service Commission in December 2017 out of an abundance of caution, although Entergy Arkansas does not serve any retail customers in Missouri. In April 2018 the Missouri Public Service Commission approved Entergy Arkansas’s filing. In2019 production cost allocation rider update are effective July 2018, Entergy Arkansas filed a settlement, reached by all parties in the APSC proceeding, resolving all issues. The APSC approved the settlement agreement and restructuring in August 2018. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Entergy Arkansas will credit retail customers $39.6 million over six years, beginning in 2019. Entergy Arkansas has also received the required FERC and NRC approvals. The restructuring is anticipated to close on or before December 1, 2018.2019 through June 2020.


Energy Cost Recovery Rider


In March 2018,2019, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the ratea decrease from $0.01547$0.01882 per kWh to $0.01882$0.01462 per kWh. ThekWh and became effective with the first billing cycle in April 2019. In March 2019 the Arkansas Attorney General filed a response to Entergy Arkansas’s annual redeterminationadjustment and included with its filing requesting thata motion for investigation of alleged overcharges to customers in connection with the APSC suspendFERC’s October 2018 order in the proposed tariff to investigate the amount of the redetermination or, alternatively, to allow recovery subject to refund. Among the reasons the Attorney General cited for suspension were questions pertaining to howopportunity sales proceeding. Entergy Arkansas forecasted sales and potential implications of the Tax Act. Entergy Arkansas repliedfiled its response to the Attorney General’s filing andmotion in April 2019 in which Entergy Arkansas stated that,its intent to initiate a proceeding to address recovery issues related to the extent there are questions pertainingOctober 2018 FERC order. In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas initiated the opportunity sales recovery proceeding, discussed below, and requested that the APSC establish that proceeding as the single designated proceeding in which interested parties may assert claims related to its load forecasting or the operationappropriate retail rate treatment of the FERC October 2018 order and related FERC orders in the opportunity sales proceeding. In June 2019 the APSC granted Entergy Arkansas’s request and also denied the Attorney General’s motion in the energy cost recovery rider, those issues exceed the scope of the instant rate redetermination. Entergy Arkansas also stated that potential effects of the Tax Act are appropriately considered in the APSC’s separate proceeding looking at potential

110

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

implications of the new tax law. The APSC general staff filed a reply to the Attorney General’s filing and agreed thatseeking an investigation into Entergy Arkansas’s filing complied with the terms of the energy cost recovery rider. The redetermined rate became effective with the first billing cycle of April 2018. Subsequently in April 2018 the APSC issued an order declining to suspend Entergy Arkansas’sannual energy cost recovery rider rateadjustment and decliningreferred the evaluation of such matters to require further investigation at that time of the issues suggested by the Attorney General in theopportunity sales recovery proceeding. Following a period of discovery, the Attorney General filed a supplemental response in October 2018 raising new issues with Entergy Arkansas’s March 2018 rate redetermination and asserting that $45.7 million of the increase should be collected subject to refund pending further investigation. Also in October 2018, Entergy Arkansas filed to dismiss the Attorney General’s supplemental response, the APSC general staff filed a motion to strike the Attorney General’s filing, and the Attorney General filed its supplemental response disputing Entergy Arkansas and the APSC staff’s filing.


Opportunity Sales Proceeding


SeeAs discussed in the Form 10-K, for discussion of thein December 2018, Entergy Arkansas opportunity sales proceeding filed with the FERC. In October 2018 the FERC issued an order addressing the ALJ’s July 2017 initial decision. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision to cap the reduction in Entergy Arkansas’s payment to account for the increased bandwidth payments that Entergy Arkansas made to the other operating companies. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that Grand Gulf sales from January through September 2000 should be included in the calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payment. The FERC affirmed on other grounds the ALJ’s rejection of the LPSC’s claim that certain joint account sales should be accounted for as part of the calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payment. The FERC directed Entergy to make a compliance filing by December 17,in response to the FERC’s October 2018 providingorder in the opportunity sales proceeding. The compliance filing provided a final calculation of Entergy Arkansas’s payments to the other Utility operating companies, pursuantincluding interest. No protests were filed in response to the findings in the order and explaining how Entergy Arkansas will pay refunds, including the timeline for making those refunds. The FERC’s decision effectively establishes the base amount Entergy Arkansas must pay to the other Utility operating companies for the period of 2000-2009 to be approximately $68 million. Entergy Arkansas will also pay interest on the base amount to the other Utility operating companies, currently estimated to be approximately $64 million as of September 30,December 2018 for an estimated total of $132 million. This amount is consistent with the liability previously recognized by Entergy Arkansas.compliance filing. The December 2018 compliance filing will includeis pending FERC action.

In February 2019 the recipientsLPSC filed a new complaint relating to two issues that were raised in the opportunity sales proceeding, but that, in its October 2018 order, the FERC held were outside the scope of the proceeding. In March 2019, Entergy Services filed an answer and final amount of payments owed bymotion to dismiss the new complaint.

In May 2019, Entergy Arkansas as well asfiled an application and supporting testimony with the timingAPSC requesting approval of the payments. Because management currently expectsa special rider tariff to recover the costs of these payments from its retail portioncustomers over a 24-month period.  The application requested that the APSC approve the rider to take effect within 30 days or, if suspended by the APSC as allowed by commission rule, approve the rider to take effect in the first billing cycle of the payments due as a resultfirst month occurring

117

Table of this proceeding, Contents
Entergy Arkansas, previously recognizedLLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

30 days after issuance of the APSC’s order approving the rider. In June 2019 the APSC suspended Entergy Arkansas’s tariff and granted Entergy Arkansas’s motion asking the APSC to establish the proceeding as the single designated proceeding in which interested parties may assert claims related to the appropriate retail rate treatment of the FERC’s October 2018 order and related FERC orders in the opportunity sales proceeding.

Net Metering Legislation

An Arkansas law was enacted effective July 2019 that, among other things, expands the definition of a regulatory asset with“net metering customer” to include two additional types of customers: (1) customers that lease net metering facilities, subject to certain leasing arrangements, and (2) government entities or other entities exempt from state and federal income taxes that enter into a balanceservice contract for a net metering facility. The latter provision would allow eligible entities, many of $114 millionwhom are small and large general service customers, to purchase renewable energy directly from third party providers and receive bill credits for these purchases. The APSC was given authority under this law to address certain matters, such as cost shifting and the appropriate compensation for net metered energy, and has initiated proceedings for this purpose. Because of September 30, 2018.the size and number of customers eligible under this new law, there is a risk of loss of load and the shifting of significant costs from eligible entities to other customers.


Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The following is an update to that discussion.

ANO

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the NRC’s decision in March 2015 to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4, of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix, and the resulting significant additional NRC inspection activities at the ANO site. In June 2018 the NRC moved ANO 1 and ANO 2 into the “licensee response column,” or Column 1, of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review ANO 1’s and ANO 2’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4.


111

Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies. The following is an update to that discussion.


In the first quarter 2019, Entergy Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for ANO 1 and ANO 2 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimates resulted in a $126.2 million increase in its decommissioning cost liabilities, along with corresponding increases in the related asset retirement cost assets that will be depreciated over the remaining lives of the units.

New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$568,399
 
$673,226
 
$1,614,028
 
$1,644,239
 
$687,526
 
$568,399
 
$1,776,267
 
$1,614,028
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 164,438
 133,254
 379,240
 283,354
 109,779
 164,438
 370,534
 379,240
Purchased power 58,213
 63,423
 195,024
 193,108
 61,074
 58,213
 156,417
 195,024
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 19,062
 22,988
 61,623
 59,942
 17,381
 19,062
 51,823
 61,623
Other operation and maintenance 188,882
 171,498
 536,032
 502,696
 188,299
 188,882
 542,765
 536,032
Decommissioning 15,226
 14,320
 44,971
 42,321
 17,422
 15,226
 50,351
 44,971
Taxes other than income taxes 27,972
 29,259
 80,322
 78,438
 31,783
 27,972
 87,327
 80,322
Depreciation and amortization 73,579
 70,433
 218,261
 206,586
 78,594
 73,579
 231,502
 218,261
Other regulatory credits - net (13,758) (5,219) (29,378) (10,797)
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net 1,018
 (13,758) (8,873) (29,378)
TOTAL 533,614
 499,956
 1,486,095
 1,355,648
 505,350
 533,614
 1,481,846
 1,486,095
                
OPERATING INCOME 34,785
 173,270
 127,933
 288,591
 182,176
 34,785
 294,421
 127,933
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 3,735
 4,140
 12,214
 13,922
 3,977
 3,735
 10,777
 12,214
Interest and investment income 12,060
 6,738
 21,352
 27,865
 8,788
 12,060
 19,193
 21,352
Miscellaneous - net (3,063) (3,332) (10,815) (9,976) (4,286) (3,063) (12,704) (10,815)
TOTAL 12,732
 7,546
 22,751
 31,811
 8,479
 12,732
 17,266
 22,751
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 31,632
 31,010
 92,315
 86,776
 35,454
 31,632
 104,664
 92,315
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1,739) (1,944) (5,737) (6,458) (1,641) (1,739) (4,384) (5,737)
TOTAL 29,893
 29,066
 86,578
 80,318
 33,813
 29,893
 100,280
 86,578
                
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 17,624
 151,750
 64,106
 240,084
 156,842
 17,624
 211,407
 64,106
                
Income taxes (111,266) 59,112
 (183,595) 94,592
 7,126
 (111,266) (27,729) (183,595)
                
NET INCOME 128,890
 92,638
 247,701
 145,492
 149,716
 128,890
 239,136
 247,701
                
Preferred dividend requirements 357
 357
 1,071
 1,071
 
 357
 
 1,071
                
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$128,533
 
$92,281
 
$246,630
 
$144,421
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY 
$149,716
 
$128,533
 
$239,136
 
$246,630
                
See Notes to Financial Statements.                




(Page left blank intentionally)







ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$239,136
 
$247,701
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 351,390
 335,939
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 85,246
 28,463
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (70,395) (33,422)
Fuel inventory (5,350) 7,523
Accounts payable (24,766) (20,904)
Taxes accrued (18,608) 30,686
Interest accrued 20,206
 13,558
Deferred fuel costs 52,468
 24,463
Other working capital accounts 44,803
 (8,827)
Provisions for estimated losses 8,841
 10,013
Other regulatory assets (55,749) 22,574
Other regulatory liabilities 32,537
 (218,518)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (26,136) (64,461)
Other assets and liabilities (57,011) (12,203)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 576,612
 362,585
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (488,487) (517,882)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 11,016
 12,572
Nuclear fuel purchases (26,732) (79,142)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel 22,834
 31,897
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 199,031
 259,331
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (214,205) (269,913)
Change in money pool receivable - net (6,896) (13,421)
Changes in securitization account (3,238) (4,821)
Insurance proceeds 
 7,043
Change in other investments 1
 (1)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (506,676) (574,337)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 781,510
 658,427
Retirement of long-term debt (473,827) (372,447)
Capital contribution from parent 
 350,000
Changes in short-term borrowings - net 
 (49,974)
Changes in money pool payable - net (182,738) (166,137)
Distributions/dividends paid:    
Common equity (115,000) 
Preferred stock 
 (1,071)
Other (2,931) 8,520
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 7,014
 427,318
     
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 76,950
 215,566
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 119
 6,216
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$77,069
 
$221,782
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$80,644
 
$74,966
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$247,701
 
$145,492
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 335,939
 311,725
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 28,463
 78,390
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Receivables (33,422) (45,180)
Fuel inventory 7,523
 10,089
Accounts payable (20,904) (78,396)
Taxes accrued 30,686
 15,367
Interest accrued 13,558
 12,436
Deferred fuel costs 24,463
 (53,664)
Other working capital accounts (8,827) (6,762)
Provisions for estimated losses 10,013
 10,094
Other regulatory assets 22,574
 (4,680)
Other regulatory liabilities (218,518) 43,473
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (64,461) (73,107)
Other assets and liabilities (12,203) 2,274
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 362,585
 367,551
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (517,882) (558,985)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 12,572
 14,521
Nuclear fuel purchases (79,142) (95,289)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel 31,897
 51,029
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 259,331
 219,223
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (269,913) (228,740)
Change in money pool receivable - net (13,421) 
Changes in securitization account (4,821) (3,619)
Insurance proceeds 7,043
 
Change in other investments (1) (65,981)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (574,337) (667,841)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 658,427
 222,717
Retirement of long-term debt (372,447) (6,803)
Capital contribution from parent 350,000
 
Changes in short-term borrowings - net (49,974) 23,257
Changes in money pool payable - net (166,137) 43,882
Dividends paid:    
Preferred stock (1,071) (1,071)
Other 8,520
 (1,737)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 427,318
 280,245
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 215,566
 (20,045)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 6,216
 20,509
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$221,782
 
$464
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$74,966
 
$70,321
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$410
 
$118
Temporary cash investments 76,659
 1
Total cash and cash equivalents 77,069
 119
Securitization recovery trust account 7,904
 4,666
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 160,955
 94,348
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,423) (1,264)
Associated companies 45,499
 48,184
Other 48,569
 64,393
Accrued unbilled revenues 137,444
 108,092
Total accounts receivable 391,044
 313,753
Deferred fuel costs 
 19,235
Fuel inventory - at average cost 28,498
 23,148
Materials and supplies - at average cost 207,541
 196,314
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 33,581
 78,966
Prepayments and other 17,447
 14,553
TOTAL 763,084
 650,754
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Decommissioning trust funds 1,045,826
 912,049
Other 5,476
 5,480
TOTAL 1,051,302
 917,529
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 12,041,822
 11,611,041
Construction work in progress 299,195
 243,731
Nuclear fuel 186,731
 220,602
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 12,527,748
 12,075,374
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 4,985,276
 4,864,818
UTILITY PLANT - NET 7,542,472
 7,210,556
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $4,596 as of September 30, 2019 and $14,329 as of December 31, 2018) 1,590,726
 1,534,977
Deferred fuel costs 67,591
 67,294
Other 21,441
 20,486
TOTAL 1,679,758
 1,622,757
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$11,036,616
 
$10,401,596
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$13,121
 
$6,184
Temporary cash investments 208,661
 32
Total cash and cash equivalents 221,782
 6,216
Securitization recovery trust account 8,570
 3,748
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 141,294
 110,016
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,420) (1,063)
Associated companies 57,253
 38,765
Other 51,756
 65,209
Accrued unbilled revenues 116,007
 105,120
Total accounts receivable 364,890
 318,047
Deferred fuel costs 38,691
 63,302
Fuel inventory - at average cost 21,835
 29,358
Materials and supplies - at average cost 196,623
 192,853
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 57,683
 56,485
Prepayments and other 22,316
 12,108
TOTAL 932,390
 682,117
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Decommissioning trust funds 996,857
 944,890
Other 785
 3,160
TOTAL 997,642
 948,050
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 11,376,058
 11,059,538
Construction work in progress 350,554
 280,888
Nuclear fuel 240,582
 277,345
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 11,967,194
 11,617,771
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 4,908,917
 4,762,352
UTILITY PLANT - NET 7,058,277
 6,855,419
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $17,247 as of September 30, 2018 and $28,583 as of December 31, 2017) 1,544,863
 1,567,437
Deferred fuel costs 67,244
 67,096
Other 18,252
 13,910
TOTAL 1,630,359
 1,648,443
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$10,618,668
 
$10,134,029
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 
$55,971
 
$251,768
Other 195,783
 187,387
Customer deposits 101,349
 99,053
Taxes accrued 38,281
 56,889
Interest accrued 39,099
 18,893
Deferred fuel costs 33,530
 
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 33,692
 99,316
Other 48,516
 23,943
TOTAL 546,221
 737,249
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 1,172,542
 1,085,545
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 32,002
 32,903
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 480,573
 505,748
Other regulatory liabilities 526,004
 402,668
Decommissioning 1,224,936
 1,048,428
Accumulated provisions 57,820
 48,979
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 287,086
 313,295
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $14,016 as of September 30, 2019 and $20,898 as of December 31, 2018) 3,538,384
 3,225,759
Other 63,809
 17,919
TOTAL 7,383,156
 6,681,244
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
EQUITY    
Member's equity 3,107,239
 2,983,103
TOTAL 3,107,239
 2,983,103
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$11,036,616
 
$10,401,596
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Short-term borrowings 
$—
 
$49,974
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 183,372
 365,915
Other 172,820
 215,942
Customer deposits 99,138
 97,687
Taxes accrued 78,007
 47,321
Interest accrued 31,773
 18,215
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 179,712
 
Other 32,411
 29,922
TOTAL 777,233
 824,976
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 1,235,625
 1,190,669
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 33,203
 34,104
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 533,179
 985,823
Other regulatory liabilities 418,005
 363,591
Decommissioning 1,026,816
 981,213
Accumulated provisions 44,742
 34,729
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 288,870
 353,274
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $27,958 as of September 30, 2018 and $34,662 as of December 31, 2017) 3,242,282
 2,952,399
Other 13,979
 5,147
TOTAL 6,836,701
 6,900,949
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
Preferred stock without sinking fund 31,350
 31,350
     
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2018 and 2017 470
 470
Paid-in capital 1,140,264
 790,264
Retained earnings 1,832,650
 1,586,020
TOTAL 2,973,384
 2,376,754
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$10,618,668
 
$10,134,029
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
Member's Equity
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2017
$2,376,754
Net income36,255
Preferred stock dividends(357)
Balance at March 31, 20182,412,652
Net income82,556
Capital contribution from parent350,000
Preferred stock dividends(357)
Balance at June 30, 20182,844,851
Net income128,890
Preferred stock dividends(357)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$2,973,384
Balance at December 31, 2018
$2,983,103
Net income39,121
Balance at March 31, 20193,022,224
Net income50,299
Common equity distributions(115,000)
Balance at June 30, 20192,957,523
Net income149,716
Balance at September 30, 2019
$3,107,239
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
     
  Common Equity  
  Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Total
  (In Thousands)
         
Balance at December 31, 2016 
$470
 
$790,243
 
$1,462,604
 
$2,253,317
         
Net income 
 
 145,492
 145,492
Preferred stock dividends 
 
 (1,071) (1,071)
         
Balance at September 30, 2017 
$470
 
$790,243
 
$1,607,025
 
$2,397,738
         
         
Balance at December 31, 2017 
$470
 
$790,264
 
$1,586,020
 
$2,376,754
         
Net income 
 
 247,701
 247,701
Capital contribution from parent 
 350,000
 
 350,000
Preferred stock dividends 
 
 (1,071) (1,071)
         
Balance at September 30, 2018 
$470
 
$1,140,264
 
$1,832,650
 
$2,973,384
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.        


ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
            
 Three Months Ended Increase/   Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %

 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:Electric Operating Revenues:      Electric Operating Revenues:      
Residential 
$250
 
$254
 
($4) (2) 
$254
 
$250
 
$4
 2
Commercial 120
 150
 (30) (20) 163
 120
 43
 36
Industrial 126
 145
 (19) (13) 156
 126
 30
 24
Governmental 4
 6
 (2) (33) 6
 4
 2
 50
Total billed retail 500
 555
 (55) (10) 579
 500
 79
 16
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 23
 33
 (10) (30) 30
 23
 7
 30
Non-associated companies 37
 45
 (8) (18) 29
 37
 (8) (22)
Other 8
 40
 (32) (80) 50
 8
 42
 525
Total 
$568
 
$673
 
($105) (16) 
$688
 
$568
 
$120
 21
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 2,482
 2,236
 246
 11
 2,393
 2,482
 (89) (4)
Commercial 1,816
 1,723
 93
 5
 1,761
 1,816
 (55) (3)
Industrial 2,283
 2,074
 209
 10
 2,125
 2,283
 (158) (7)
Governmental 67
 67
 
 
 67
 67
 
 
Total retail 6,648
 6,100
 548
 9
 6,346
 6,648
 (302) (5)
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 483
 483
 
 
 588
 483
 105
 22
Non-associated companies 1,818
 2,026
 (208) (10) 1,515
 1,818
 (303) (17)
Total 8,949
 8,609
 340
 4
 8,449
 8,949
 (500) (6)
                
 Nine Months Ended Increase/          
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 Nine Months Ended Increase/  

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:Electric Operating Revenues:      Electric Operating Revenues:      
Residential 
$645
 
$597
 
$48
 8
 
$621
 
$645
 
($24) (4)
Commercial 334
 375
 (41) (11) 413
 334
 79
 24
Industrial 335
 355
 (20) (6) 396
 335
 61
 18
Governmental 13
 15
 (2) (13) 16
 13
 3
 23
Total billed retail 1,327
 1,342
 (15) (1) 1,446
 1,327
 119
 9
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 80
 96
 (16) (17) 89
 80
 9
 11
Non-associated companies 100
 96
 4
 4
 124
 100
 24
 24
Other 107
 110
 (3) (3) 117
 107
 10
 9
Total 
$1,614
 
$1,644
 
($30) (2) 
$1,776
 
$1,614
 
$162
 10
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 6,455
 5,625
 830
 15
 6,144
 6,455
 (311) (5)
Commercial 4,577
 4,410
 167
 4
 4,433
 4,577
 (144) (3)
Industrial 6,064
 5,584
 480
 9
 5,800
 6,064
 (264) (4)
Governmental 181
 180
 1
 1
 181
 181
 
 
Total retail 17,277
 15,799
 1,478
 9
 16,558
 17,277
 (719) (4)
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 1,206
 1,316
 (110) (8) 1,694
 1,206
 488
 40
Non-associated companies 4,706
 4,374
 332
 8
 6,071
 4,706
 1,365
 29
Total 23,189
 21,489
 1,700
 8
 24,323
 23,189
 1,134
 5

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS



Results of Operations


Net Income


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Net income increased $32$37 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax ratehigher retail electric price and higher net revenue, after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers which is offset in income taxes.volume/weather. The increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.interest expense.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net income increased $109.1$51.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue, after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers which is offset in income taxes, and a lower effective income tax rate.retail electric price. The increase was partially offset by a higher other operation and maintenance expenses andeffective income tax rate, lower volume/weather, higher depreciation and amortization expenses.expenses, and higher interest expense.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:

2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$1,206.6
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(77.3
$717.4)
Retail electric price
52.0

Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers37.6
Volume/weather12.8
2019 operating revenues
$1,231.7

Entergy Louisiana’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues effective September 2018 and an interim increase in formula rate plan revenues effective June 2019 due to the inclusion of the first-year revenue requirement for St. Charles Power Station, each as approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan proceedings.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through changes in the formula rate plan effective May 2018.

126

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

In third quarter 2019, $17.2 million was returned to customers as compared to $54.8 million in third quarter 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in operating revenues was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2018:
Amount
(54.8In Millions)
2018 operating revenues
$3,308.7
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(159.2)
Retail electric price(12.6106.5)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers55.5
Volume/weather14.7(14.2
)
Other2019 operating revenues6.3
2018 net revenue

$671.03,297.3


Entergy Louisiana’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues effective September 2018 and an interim increase in formula rate plan revenues effective June 2019 due to the inclusion of the first-year revenue requirement for the St. Charles Power Station, each as approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan proceedings.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through changes in the formula rate plan effective May 2018. In the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $30.8 million was returned to customers as compared to $86.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenueoperating revenues was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The retail electric pricevolume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 623 GWh, or 3%, in billed electricity usage for residential and commercial customers, including the effect of less favorable weather. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from expansion projects, primarily in the chemicals industry.


127

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2019 Compared to Third Quarter 2018

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $5.6 million in loss provisions;
an increase of $4.3 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement; and
an increase of $3.6 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance.

The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $3.9 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to proceeds of $5.2 million received in September 2019 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation.
Taxes other than income increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the St. Charles Power Station, which was placed into service in May 2019.

Other regulatory charges (credits) include regulatory charges of $18.3 million recorded in the third quarter 2018 to reflect the effects of a provision in the settlement reached in the formula rate plan extension proceeding to return the benefits of the lower federal income tax rate in 2018 to customers and a decreasecustomers. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the formula rate plan revenues implemented withextension proceeding.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the first billing cycleissuance of $525 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds in March 2019.

Nine Months Ended September 2017. The decrease was partially offset by 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $10.4 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;

an increase of $8.3 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance; and
an increase of $3.5 million in distribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services.


120128

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


resultingThe increase was substantially offset by:

a decrease of $7.2 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to proceeds of $5.2 million received in September 2019 from the DOE litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously expensed and a lower scope of work performed during plant outages in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018;
a decrease of $6 million in transmission expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018;
a decrease of $4 million in vegetation maintenance costs; and
a decrease of $3.6 million in energy efficiency costs due to the timing of recovery from lower Grand Gulf purchased power expenses. customers.

See Note 21 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for furthera discussion of the formula rate plan extension proceeding.spent nuclear fuel litigation


The volume/weather variance isDepreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales.St. Charles Power Station, which was placed in service in May 2019.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) otherOther regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:
Amount
(In Millions)
2017 net revenue
$1,901.7
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(86.3)
Retail electric price(52.7)
Volume/weather65.1
Other13.4
2018 net revenue
$1,841.2

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through changes in the formula rate plan, effective May 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenue was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to include regulatory charges of $73.3 million recorded in 2018 to reflect the effects of a provision in the settlement reached in the formula rate plan extension proceeding to return the benefits of the lower federal income tax rate in 2018 to customers. Partially offsetting the decrease were increases resulting from lower Grand Gulf purchased power expenses and an energy efficiency rider, effective January 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan extension proceeding.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1,257 GWh, or 3%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage primarily due to a decrease in demand from existing customers.

Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2018 Compared to Third Quarter 2017

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $3.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work performed in the third quarter 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017;
an increase of $3.1 million in information technology expenses primarily due to higher software maintenance costs and higher contract costs;
a $1.7 million loss on disposal of assets in 2018 and a $1.4 million gain on disposal of assets in 2017; and
an increase of $2.5 million in energy efficiency costs.


121

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $4.8 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in the third quarter 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.


Other income increased primarily due to an increasechanges in decommissioning trust fund investment activity.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $525 million of 4.20% Series mortgage bonds in March 2019.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 17.7% for the third quarter 2019 and 16.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, due to higher construction work in progress in 2018, which included the Lake Charles Power Station and St. Charles Power Station projects. The increase was partially offset due to a change in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certain of the decommissioning trust funds in 2017.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $21.8 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work performed in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017;
an increase of $6.8 million in energy efficiency costs;
an increase of $6.8 million in transmission expenses primarily due to higher labor and contract costs to support industrial customers;
an increase of $6.4 million in information technology expenses primarily due to higher software maintenance costs and higher contract costs; and
an increase of $5.5 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals and a higher scope of work performed during plant outages in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.

The increase was partially offset by higher nuclear insurance refunds of $4.2 million in 2018.

Taxes other thanstate income taxes increased primarily duetaxes. See Note 10 to increases in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments.

Depreciationthe financial statements herein and amortization expenses increased primarily dueNotes 2 and 3 to additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to an increasethe financial statements in the allowanceForm 10-K for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2018, which included the Lake Charles Power Station and St. Charles Power Station projects. The increase was partially offset by a change in decommissioning trust fund investment activity, including portfolio rebalancing of certaindiscussion of the decommissioning trust funds in 2017.effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Income Taxes


The effective income tax rate was 1.3% for the third quarter 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by state income taxes. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The effective income tax rate was (6.3%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, an IRS audit settlement for the 2012-2013 tax returns, and book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by state income taxes. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and

122

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Note 103 to the financial statements hereinin the Form 10-K for a discussion of the IRS audit settlement.


The effective income tax rate was 33.6% for the third quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate
129

Table of 35% was primarily due to bookContents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interestsSubsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes.Analysis

The effective income tax rate was 32.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The difference in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes.

Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017. Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy and Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flow


Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$35,907
 
$213,850

$43,364
 
$35,907
      
Cash flow provided by (used in):      
Operating activities943,300
 927,176
962,443
 943,300
Investing activities(1,283,844) (1,379,365)(1,260,023) (1,283,844)
Financing activities518,222
 293,862
382,261
 518,222
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents177,678
 (158,327)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents84,681
 177,678
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$213,585
 
$55,523

$128,045
 
$213,585


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $16.1$19.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


a decrease of $40.1 million in pension contributions in 2019 as compared to 2018. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding;
proceeds of $78.7$16.6 million received in spending onSeptember 2019 from the DOE litigation regarding spent nuclear refueling outages; and
a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project.fuel storage costs that were previously expensed. See Note 21 to the financial statements in the Form 10-Kherein for a discussion of the settlementspent nuclear fuel litigation; and refund.


123

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The increase was partially offset by:

a decrease of $114 million in income tax refunds in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Entergy Louisiana received income tax refunds in 2017 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement resulting from the utilization of Entergy Louisiana’s net operating losses; and
the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the effects and the regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The increase was partially offset by:

an increase of $68.4 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages;
the timing of payments to vendors; and
an increase of $18.7 million in storm spending in 2019.


130

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $95.5$23.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


a decrease of $152.5$214.4 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures, primarily due to lower spending on the St. Charles Power Station and Lake Charles Power Station projects in 2019;
money pool activity;
a decrease of $11.6 million in information technology capital expenditures primarily due to lower spending in 2019 on critical infrastructure protection; and
several individually insignificant items.

The decrease was partially offset by:

an increase of $73.3 million as a result of fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and service deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
money pool activity;
$33.3 million in funds held on deposit in 2017 for interest payments due October 1, 2017;
a decreasean increase of $14.1$55.4 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to decreasedincreased spending on various nuclear projects; andprojects in 2019;
a decreasean increase of $8.9$47.5 million in information technologydistribution construction expenditures primarily due to higherinvestment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy Louisiana’s distribution system, including increased spending in 2017 on various information technology projects and upgrades.

The decrease was partially offset by:

advanced metering infrastructure;
an increase of $89.9$38.9 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending on the Lake Charles Power Station project in 2018, partially offset by lower spending on the St. Charles Power Station project in 2018; and
an increase of $80 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017.2018; and

an increase of $38.6 million in storm spending in 2019.
Increases
Decreases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a usesource of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool increaseddecreased by $35.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to increasing by $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to increasing by $50.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Net cash flow provided by financing activities increased $224.4decreased $136 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


the issuance of $750 million of 4.00% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2018. A portion of the proceeds was used to repay $375 million of 6.0% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2018;
the issuance of $600 million of 4.20% collateral trustSeries mortgage bonds in August 2018. A portion of the proceeds was used to repay $300 million of 6.5% Series first mortgage bonds in September 2018; and
a decreasean increase of $35.3$99 million in common equity distributions.distributions in 2019 primarily to maintain Entergy Louisiana’s targeted capital structure.


The increasedecrease was partially offset by:


the issuance of $450$525 million of 3.12% collateral trust4.20% Series mortgage bonds in May 2017. A portion of the proceeds was used to repay $45.3 million of Waterford Series collateral trust mortgage notes;

124

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

March 2019;
net repayments of short-termlong-term borrowings of $43.5$29.2 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities in 20182019 compared to net short-term borrowings of $36.8 million in 2017; and
net repayments of long-term borrowings of $37 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities in 2018 compared to 2018; and
net long-termrepayments of short-term borrowings of $115.1$43.5 million in 2017.2018 on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities.



131

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.


Capital Structure


Entergy Louisiana’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table.
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Debt to capital54.0% 53.8%53.8% 53.6%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(0.3%) (0.3%)(0.1%) (0.3%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)53.7% 53.5%53.7% 53.3%
Effect of subtracting cash(0.8%) (0.1%)(0.5%) (0.1%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)52.9% 53.4%53.2% 53.2%
(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings, financing lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Louisiana uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Louisiana also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Louisiana’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.


Entergy Louisiana is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $4.1$4.4 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the Washington Parish Energy Center discussed below, and the St. Charles Power Station and the Lake Charles Power Station; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhancemaintain reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; investments in River Bend and Waterford 3; software and security; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


125

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
(In Thousands)
$13,617 $11,173 $72,899 $22,503
September 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018 
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
(In Thousands)
$11,358 $46,843 $13,617 $11,173


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $350 million scheduled to expire in September 2023.2024.  The credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $15 million of the

132

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2018,2019, there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility.  In addition, Entergy Louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of September 30, 2018,2019, a $22$11.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Louisiana’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


The Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities, each in the amount of $105 million and scheduled to expire in September 2021.  As of September 30, 2018, $34.52019, $84.3 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Louisiana River Bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. As of September 30, 2018, $30.52019, $65.5 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Louisiana Waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities.


Washington Parish Energy CenterSt. Charles Power Station


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed an agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the construction and purchase of a peaking plant. In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the plant. In April 2018 the parties reached a settlement recommending certification and cost recovery through the additional capacity mechanism of the formula rate plan, consistent with prior LPSC precedent with respect to the certification and recovery of plants previously acquired by Entergy Louisiana. The LPSC issued an order in December 2016 approving certification that the settlementpublic necessity and convenience would be served by the construction of the St. Charles Power Station. Commercial operation commenced in May 2018.2019.


State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel Cost Recoveryin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.

Fuel and purchased power cost recovery

In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of the fuel adjustment clause filings by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, whose business was combined with Entergy Louisiana in 2015.  The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013.  Discovery commenced in July 2015.  No report of audit has been issued.

In May 2018 the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause filings.  The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed through Entergy Louisiana’s purchased gas adjustment clause for the period from 2016 through 2017.  Discovery commenced in September 2018.  No report of audit has been issued.


126

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Retail Rates - Electric


20162017 Formula Rate Plan Filing


As discussed in the Form 10-K,Commercial operation at St. Charles Power Station commenced in May 2019. In May 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed an update to its 2017 formula rate plan evaluation report to include the estimated first-year revenue requirement of $109.5 million associated with the St. Charles Power Station. The resulting interim adjustment to rates became effective with the first billing cycle of June 2019.

2018 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In May 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 20162018 calendar year operations. Rates reflecting the adjustments included in the formula rate plan evaluation report were implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund. In September 2017 the LPSC issued its report indicating that no changes to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report were required but reserved for several issues, including Entergy Louisiana’s September 2017 update to its formula rate plan evaluation report.  In JulyThe 2018 Entergy Louisiana and the LPSC staff filed an unopposed joint report setting forth a correction to the annualization calculation, the effect of which was a net $3.5 million revenue requirement reduction, and indicating that there are no outstanding issues with the 2016 formula rate plan report, the supplemental report, or the interim updates.  In September 2018 the LPSC approved the unopposed joint report.

Formula Rate Plan Extension Request

In August 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed a request with the LPSC seeking to extend its formula rate plan for three years (2017-2019) with limited modifications of its terms.  Those modifications include: a one-time resetting of base rates to the midpoint of the band at Entergy Louisiana’s authorized return on equity of 9.95% for the 2017 test year; narrowing of the formula rate plan bandwidth from a total of 160 basis points to 80 basis points; and a forward-looking mechanism that would allow Entergy Louisiana to recover certain transmission-related costs contemporaneously with when those projects begin delivering benefits to customers.  Several parties intervened in the proceeding and all parties participated in settlement discussions. In April 2018 the LPSC approved an unopposed joint motion filed by Entergy Louisiana and the LPSC staff that settles the matter. The settlement extends the formula rate plan for three years, providing for rates through at least August 2021. In addition to retaining the major features of the traditional formula rate plan, substantive features of the extended formula rate plan include:

a mid-point reset of formula rate plan revenues to a 9.95% earned return on common equity for the 2017 test year and for the St. Charles Power Station when it enters commercial operation;
a 9.8% target earned return on common equity for the 2018 and 2019 test years;
narrowing of the common equity bandwidth to plus or minus 60 basis points around the target earned return on common equity;
a cap on potential revenue increase of $35 million for the 2018 evaluation period, and $70 million for the cumulative 2018 and 2019 evaluation periods, on formula rate plan cost of service rate increases (the cap excludes rate changes associated with the transmission recovery mechanism described below and rate changes associated with additional capacity);
a framework for the flow back of certain tax benefits created by the Tax Act to customers; and
a transmission recovery mechanism providing for the opportunity to recover certain transmission related expenditures in excess of $100 million annually for projects placed in service up to one month prior to rate change outside of sharing that is designed to operate in a manner similar to the additional capacity mechanism.

2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing

In June 2018, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2017 calendar year operations. As stated above under “Formula Rate Plan Extension Request,” for the 2017 test year there will be a mid-point reset of formula rate plan revenues to a 9.95% earned return on common equity for the 2017 test year. As such, base rider formula rate plan revenue is to be adjusted prospectively to increase or decrease the earned return on equity fully to the approved cost of equity of 9.95%. The 2017 test year evaluation report produced an earned return on common equity of 8.16%, due in large part10.61% leading to revenue-neutral realignments to other recovery mechanisms. Without these realignments, the evaluation report produces an earned return on equity of 9.88% and a resulting base rider formula rate plan revenue increasedecrease of $4.8$8.9 million. ExcludingWhile base rider formula rate plan revenue decreased as a result of this filing, overall formula rate plan revenues increased by approximately $118.7 million. This outcome is primarily driven by a reduction to the Tax Act credits provided for bypreviously flowed through the tax reform adjustment mechanisms, total formula rate plan revenues will furthermechanism and an increase by a total of $98 million as a result of the evaluation report due to

127

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

adjustments to the additional capacity and MISO cost recovery mechanisms of the formula rate plan, and implementation of the transmission recovery mechanism. In August 2018, Entergy Louisiana filed a supplemental formula rate plan evaluation report to reflect changes from the 2016 test year formula rate plan proceedings, a decrease toin the transmission recovery mechanism, partially offset by reductions in the additional capacity mechanism revenue requirements and extraordinary cost items. The filing is subject to reflect lower actual capital additions, and a decrease to evaluation period expenses to reflectreview by the terms of a new power sales agreement. Based on the August 2018 update, Entergy Louisiana would recognize a total decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately $17.6 million. Results of the updated 2017 evaluation report filingLPSC. Resulting rates were implemented with thein September 2018 billing month2019, subject to refund and review by the LPSC staff and intervenors. In accordance with the terms of the formula rate plan, in September 2018 the LPSC staff and intervenors submitted their responsesdue to Entergy Louisiana’s original formula rate plan evaluation report and supplemental compliance updates. The LPSC staff asserted objections/reservations regarding 1) Entergy Louisiana’s proposed rate adjustments associated with the return of excess accumulated deferred income taxes pursuant to the Tax Act and the treatment of accumulated deferred income taxes related to reductions of rate base; 2) Entergy Louisiana’s reservation regarding treatment of a regulatory asset related to certain special orders by the LPSC; and 3) test year expenses billed from Entergy Services to Entergy Louisiana. Intervenors also objected to Entergy Louisiana’s treatment of the regulatory asset related to certain special orders by the LPSC. A procedural schedule has not yet been established to resolve thesecontested issues.


Entergy Louisiana also included in its filing a presentation of an initial proposal to combine the legacy Entergy Louisiana and legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana residential rates, which combination, if approved, would be accomplished on a revenue-neutral basis intended not to affect the rates of other customer classes.

Union Power Station and Deactivation or Retirement Decisions for Entergy Louisiana Plantscontemplates that any combination of residential rates resulting from this request would be implemented with the results of the 2019 test year formula rate plan filing.



133

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Several parties intervened in the proceeding, and the LPSC staff filed its report of objections/reservations in accordance with the applicable provisions of the formula rate plan. In its report, the LPSC staff re-urged reservations with respect to the outstanding issues from the 2017 test year formula rate plan filing and disputed the inclusion of certain affiliate costs for test years 2017 and 2018. The LPSC staff objected to Entergy Louisiana’s proposal to combine residential rates but proposed the setting of a status conference to establish a procedural schedule to more fully address the issue. The LPSC staff also reserved its right to object to the treatment of the sale of Willow Glen reflected in the evaluation report and to the August 2019 compliance update, which was made primarily to update the capital additions reflected in the formula rate plan’s transmission recovery mechanism, based on limited time to review it. Additionally, since the completion of certain transmission projects, the LPSC staff has issued supplemental data requests addressing the prudence of Entergy Louisiana’s expenditures in connection with those projects. Entergy Louisiana is in the process of responding to those requests.

Investigation of Costs Billed by Entergy Services

In November 2018 the LPSC issued a notice of proceeding initiating an investigation into costs incurred by Entergy Services that are included in the retail rates of Entergy Louisiana. As noted in the notice of proceeding, the LPSC observed an increase in capital construction-related costs that have been incurred by Entergy Services. Discovery is ongoing and has included efforts to seek highly detailed information on a broad range of matters unrelated to the scope of the audit.

Retail Rates - Gas

2018 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

As discussed in the Form 10-K, as a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1.  Inin January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three-year term permitted by MISO.  In March 2018 the LPSC adopted the ALJ’s recommended order finding that Entergy Louisiana did not demonstrate that its decision to permanently surrender transmission rights for the mothballed (not retired) Willow Glen 2 and 4 units was reasonable and that Entergy Louisiana should hold customers harmless from increased transmission expenses should those units be reactivated. Because no party or the LPSC suggested that Willow Glen 2 and 4 should be reactivated and because the cost to return those units to service far exceeds the revenue the units were expected to generate in MISO, Entergy Louisiana retired Willow Glen 2 and 4 in March 2018. Entergy Louisiana submitted a compliance filing regarding retirement of Willow Glen 2 and 4, and the LPSC closed the proceeding.

Retail Rates - Gas

2017 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing

In January 2018,2019, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2017.  The2018. Entergy Louisiana made a compliance filing in April 2019 and rates were implemented during the first billing cycle of May 2019, subject to refund and final LPSC review.

Gas Rate Stabilization Plan Extension Request

In August 2019, Entergy Louisiana submitted an application to the LPSC seeking extension of the evaluation report for the test year 2017 reflected an earned return on common equity of 9.06%.  This earned return is below the earnings sharing band of thegas rate stabilization plan for the 2019-2021 test years. The LPSC has established a procedural schedule to address this request with a hearing scheduled in May 2020.

Fuel and results inpurchased power recovery

In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a rate increase of $0.1 million.  Due to the enactmentreview of the Tax Act in late-December 2017,reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Louisiana did not have adequate timethrough its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. In January 2019 the LPSC staff issued its audit report recommending that Entergy Louisiana refund approximately $7.3 million, plus interest, to reflectcustomers based upon the effectsimputation of this tax legislationa claim of vendor fault in servicing its nuclear plant. Entergy Louisiana recorded a provision in the rate stabilization plan.first quarter 2019 for the potential outcome of the audit. In April 2018August 2019, Entergy Louisiana filed a supplemental evaluation reportdirect testimony challenging the basis for the test year endedLPSC staff’s recommended disallowance and providing an alternative calculation of replacement power costs should it be determined that a disallowance is appropriate. Entergy Louisiana’s calculation would require a refund to customers of approximately $4.2 million, plus interest, as compared to the LPSC staff’s recommendation of $7.3 million, plus interest. Responsive testimony was filed by the LPSC staff and intervenors in September 2017, reflecting2019; all parties either agreed with or did not oppose Entergy Louisiana’s alternative calculation of replacement power costs. In September 2019 the effects of the Tax Act, including a proposalprocedural schedule was suspended to use the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to offset storm restorationfacilitate settlement negotiations.



128134

Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


deferred operation and maintenance costs incurred by Entergy LouisianaNet Metering Rulemaking

In September 2019 the LPSC issued an order modifying its rules regarding net metering installations.  Among other things, the rule provides for 2-channel billing for net metering with excess energy put to the grid being compensated at the utility’s avoided cost.  However, the rule does provide that net meter installations in connection with the August 2016 flooding disaster in its gas service area. The supplemental filing reflects an earned return on common equityplace as of 10.79%. As-filed rates from the supplemental filing were implemented,December 31, 2019 will be subject to refund,1:1 net metering with customers receivingexcess energy put to the grid being compensated at the full retail rate for a cost reductionperiod of approximately $0.7 million effective with bills rendered15 years (through December 31, 2034), after which those installations will be subject to 2-channel billing.  The rule also eliminates the existing limit on and after the first billing cyclecumulative number of May 2018, as well as a $0.2 million reduction in the gas infrastructure rider effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of July 2018. The proceeding is currently in its discovery phase. A procedural schedule has not been established.net meter installations. 


Industrial and Commercial Customers


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Industrial and Commercial Customers” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.


Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies. The following is an update to that discussion.


In the firstsecond quarter 2018,2019, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for River BendWaterford 3 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in an $85.4a $147.5 million increase in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding increase in the related asset retirement cost asset that will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of the unit.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$1,196,278
 
$1,280,475
 
$3,263,073
 
$3,216,677
 
$1,221,874
 
$1,196,278
 
$3,252,826
 
$3,263,073
Natural gas 10,334
 10,019
 45,671
 38,034
 9,803
 10,334
 44,498
 45,671
TOTAL 1,206,612
 1,290,494
 3,308,744
 3,254,711
 1,231,677
 1,206,612
 3,297,324
 3,308,744
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 318,987
 301,584
 700,296
 635,684
 259,419
 318,987
 627,240
 700,296
Purchased power 218,063
 273,325
 736,449
 795,825
 197,830
 218,063
 678,150
 736,449
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 12,969
 13,616
 38,739
 38,565
 14,026
 12,969
 40,225
 38,739
Other operation and maintenance 239,230
 229,664
 724,604
 683,754
 249,773
 239,230
 726,496
 724,604
Decommissioning 13,654
 12,444
 39,906
 36,850
 15,606
 13,654
 43,544
 39,906
Taxes other than income taxes 44,594
 45,059
 143,021
 135,418
 49,602
 44,594
 145,942
 143,021
Depreciation and amortization 124,030
 117,923
 366,950
 349,660
 137,891
 124,030
 394,271
 366,950
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net (1,433) (1,795) 30,781
 (78,503) (29,224) (1,433) (90,762) 30,781
TOTAL 970,094
 991,820
 2,780,746
 2,597,253
 894,923
 970,094
 2,565,106
 2,780,746
                
OPERATING INCOME 236,518
 298,674
 527,998
 657,458
 336,754
 236,518
 732,218
 527,998
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 20,423
 13,393
 57,292
 34,492
 14,609
 20,423
 59,194
 57,292
Interest and investment income 53,009
 42,662
 143,137
 124,411
 45,237
 53,009
 166,721
 143,137
Miscellaneous - net (25,782) (11,542) (56,217) (29,573) (15,067) (25,782) (79,717) (56,217)
TOTAL 47,650
 44,513
 144,212
 129,330
 44,779
 47,650
 146,198
 144,212
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 73,084
 69,518
 216,762
 205,316
 78,350
 73,084
 230,684
 216,762
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (10,168) (6,713) (28,382) (17,428) (7,041) (10,168) (28,145) (28,382)
TOTAL 62,916
 62,805
 188,380
 187,888
 71,309
 62,916
 202,539
 188,380
                
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 221,252
 280,382
 483,830
 598,900
 310,224
 221,252
 675,877
 483,830
                
Income taxes 2,944
 94,098
 (30,430) 193,759
 54,964
 2,944
 109,900
 (30,430)
                
NET INCOME 
$218,308
 
$186,284
 
$514,260
 
$405,141
 
$255,260
 
$218,308
 
$565,977
 
$514,260
                
See Notes to Financial Statements.                



ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
    
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
        
Net Income
$255,260
 
$218,308
 
$565,977
 
$514,260
Other comprehensive loss       
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of $342, $177, $1,026, and $530)(969) (500) (2,907) (1,502)
Other comprehensive loss(969) (500) (2,907) (1,502)
Comprehensive Income
$254,291
 
$217,808
 
$563,070
 
$512,758
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       

(Page left blank intentionally)


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
    
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
        
Net Income
$218,308
 
$186,284
 
$514,260
 
$405,141
Other comprehensive loss       
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of $177, $232, $530, and $756)(500) (370) (1,502) (1,050)
Other comprehensive loss(500) (370) (1,502) (1,050)
Comprehensive Income
$217,808
 
$185,914
 
$512,758
 
$404,091
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.       

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
     
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$565,977
 
$514,260
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 498,397
 490,638
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 174,825
 167,603
Changes in working capital:    
Receivables (72,018) (61,281)
Fuel inventory (1,752) 6,120
Accounts payable (40,131) (20,481)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 78,910
 (22,893)
Interest accrued 5,102
 2,382
Deferred fuel costs (11,459) (25,781)
Other working capital accounts (62,332) (5,086)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses 9,748
 7,800
Changes in other regulatory assets (103,635) 49,245
Changes in other regulatory liabilities (26,115) (29,943)
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities (15,761) (59,305)
Other (37,313) (69,978)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 962,443
 943,300
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (1,277,108) (1,322,633)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 59,194
 57,292
Nuclear fuel purchases (63,157) (32,362)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel 11,608
 54,088
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (5,013) (3,297)
Changes to securitization account (6,467) (8,056)
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 307,164
 943,306
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (331,138) (973,218)
Changes in money pool receivable - net 35,485
 (2,444)
Insurance proceeds 7,040
 3,480
Other 2,369
 
Net cash flow used in investing activities (1,260,023) (1,283,844)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 2,332,003
 1,950,482
Retirement of long-term debt (1,798,014) (1,338,227)
Changes in short-term borrowings - net 
 (43,540)
Distributions paid:    
Common equity (155,000) (56,000)
Other 3,272
 5,507
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 382,261
 518,222
     
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 84,681
 177,678
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 43,364
 35,907
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$128,045
 
$213,585
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$219,323
 
$208,028
Income taxes 
$—
 
($2,973)
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net income 
$514,260
 
$405,141
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 490,638
 458,963
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 167,603
 303,397
Changes in working capital:    
Receivables (61,281) (92,610)
Fuel inventory 6,120
 7,643
Accounts payable (20,481) 31,865
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued (22,893) 97,138
Interest accrued 2,382
 9,149
Deferred fuel costs (25,781) (37,753)
Other working capital accounts (5,086) (49,266)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses 7,800
 (6,331)
Changes in other regulatory assets 49,245
 60,014
Changes in other regulatory liabilities (29,943) (72,060)
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities (59,305) (70,489)
Other (69,978) (117,625)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 943,300
 927,176
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction expenditures (1,322,633) (1,177,121)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 57,292
 34,492
Nuclear fuel purchases (32,362) (159,637)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel 54,088
 28,884
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 
 8,836
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (3,297) (1,422)
Changes to securitization account (8,056) (6,538)
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 943,306
 176,056
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (973,218) (204,500)
Changes in money pool receivable - net (2,444) (50,396)
Insurance proceeds 3,480
 5,305
Changes in other investments - net 
 (33,324)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (1,283,844) (1,379,365)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 1,950,482
 646,850
Retirement of long-term debt (1,338,227) (296,359)
Changes in short-term borrowings - net (43,540) 36,762
Distributions paid:    
Common equity (56,000) (91,250)
Other 5,507
 (2,141)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 518,222
 293,862
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 177,678
 (158,327)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 35,907
 213,850
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$213,585
 
$55,523
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$208,028
 
$189,896
Income taxes 
($2,973) 
($116,937)
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
     
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$224
 
$252
Temporary cash investments 127,821
 43,112
Total cash and cash equivalents 128,045
 43,364
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 258,090
 199,903
Allowance for doubtful accounts (2,154) (1,813)
Associated companies 81,906
 123,363
Other 46,282
 60,879
Accrued unbilled revenues 194,753
 167,052
Total accounts receivable 578,877
 549,384
Fuel inventory 36,170
 34,418
Materials and supplies - at average cost 344,207
 324,627
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 70,456
 24,406
Prepayments and other 47,519
 38,715
TOTAL 1,205,274
 1,014,914
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests 1,390,587
 1,390,587
Decommissioning trust funds 1,485,569
 1,284,996
Storm reserve escrow account 294,538
 289,525
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 308,095
 286,555
Other 13,923
 14,927
TOTAL 3,492,712
 3,266,590
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 22,283,456
 20,532,312
Natural gas 230,416
 211,421
Construction work in progress 1,325,784
 1,864,582
Nuclear fuel 291,404
 298,022
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 24,131,060
 22,906,337
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 9,018,154
 8,837,596
UTILITY PLANT - NET 15,112,906
 14,068,741
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $32,939 as of September 30, 2019 and $49,753 as of December 31, 2018) 1,208,712
 1,105,077
Deferred fuel costs 168,122
 168,122
Other 27,297
 28,371
TOTAL 1,404,131
 1,301,570
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$21,215,023
 
$19,651,815
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and cash equivalents:    
Cash 
$363
 
$5,836
Temporary cash investments 213,222
 30,071
Total cash and cash equivalents 213,585
 35,907
Accounts receivable:    
Customer 296,121
 254,308
Allowance for doubtful accounts (9,634) (8,430)
Associated companies 137,252
 143,524
Other 65,677
 60,893
Accrued unbilled revenues 177,722
 153,118
Total accounts receivable 667,138
 603,413
Fuel inventory 33,608
 39,728
Materials and supplies - at average cost 326,192
 299,881
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 29,313
 65,711
Prepaid taxes 4,736
 
Prepayments and other 47,105
 34,035
TOTAL 1,321,677
 1,078,675
     
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS    
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests 1,390,587
 1,390,587
Decommissioning trust funds 1,395,216
 1,312,073
Storm reserve escrow account 288,056
 284,759
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 285,099
 245,255
Other 14,773
 18,999
TOTAL 3,373,731
 3,251,673
     
UTILITY PLANT    
Electric 20,204,568
 19,678,536
Natural gas 208,480
 191,899
Construction work in progress 1,737,898
 1,281,452
Nuclear fuel 219,139
 337,402
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 22,370,085
 21,489,289
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 8,787,797
 8,703,047
UTILITY PLANT - NET 13,582,288
 12,786,242
     
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS    
Regulatory assets:    
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $54,910 as of September 30, 2018 and $71,367 as of December 31, 2017) 1,096,597
 1,145,842
Deferred fuel costs 168,122
 168,122
Other 27,124
 18,310
TOTAL 1,291,843
 1,332,274
     
TOTAL ASSETS 
$19,569,539
 
$18,448,864
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
     
  2019 2018
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$70,002
 
$2
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 86,781
 102,749
Other 338,724
 390,367
Customer deposits 152,627
 155,314
Taxes accrued 109,778
 30,868
Interest accrued 88,552
 83,450
Deferred fuel costs 19,952
 31,411
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 33,231
 31,457
Other 71,608
 49,202
TOTAL 971,255
 874,820
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 2,414,508
 2,226,721
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 113,346
 116,999
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 523,697
 581,001
Other regulatory liabilities 778,199
 748,784
Decommissioning 1,478,951
 1,280,272
Accumulated provisions 320,503
 310,755
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 627,155
 643,171
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $45,386 as of September 30, 2019 and $55,682 as of December 31, 2018) 7,274,158
 6,805,766
Other 402,296
 160,608
TOTAL 13,932,813
 12,874,077
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
EQUITY    
Member's equity 6,320,015
 5,909,071
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (9,060) (6,153)
TOTAL 6,310,955
 5,902,918
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$21,215,023
 
$19,651,815
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
  2018 2017
  (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$3
 
$675,002
Short-term borrowings 
 43,540
Accounts payable:    
Associated companies 83,469
 126,685
Other 337,473
 404,374
Customer deposits 155,263
 150,623
Taxes accrued 
 18,157
Interest accrued 77,910
 75,528
Deferred fuel costs 45,666
 71,447
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 157,173
 
Other 60,072
 79,037
TOTAL 917,029
 1,644,393
     
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 2,244,767
 2,050,371
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 118,217
 121,870
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 470,300
 725,368
Other regulatory liabilities 829,011
 761,059
Decommissioning 1,272,795
 1,140,461
Accumulated provisions 310,248
 302,448
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 688,498
 748,384
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $67,634 as of September 30, 2018 and $77,736 as of December 31, 2017) 6,761,120
 5,469,069
Other 195,776
 176,637
TOTAL 12,890,732
 11,495,667
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
     
EQUITY    
Member's equity 5,819,729
 5,355,204
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (57,951) (46,400)
TOTAL 5,761,778
 5,308,804
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$19,569,539
 
$18,448,864
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.    
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 Member’s
Equity
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
 (In Thousands)
      
Balance at December 31, 2017
$5,355,204
 
($46,400) 
$5,308,804
      
Net income111,593
 
 111,593
Other comprehensive loss
 (501) (501)
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-026,262
 (10,049) (3,787)
Other24
 
 24
Balance at March 31, 20185,473,083
 (56,950) 5,416,133
      
Net income184,358
 
 184,358
Other comprehensive loss
 (501) (501)
Common equity distributions(56,000) 
 (56,000)
Other(10) 
 (10)
Balance at June 30, 20185,601,431
 (57,451) 5,543,980
      
Net income218,308
 
 218,308
Other comprehensive loss
 (500) (500)
Other(10) 
 (10)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$5,819,729
 
($57,951) 
$5,761,778
      
Balance at December 31, 2018
$5,909,071
 
($6,153) 
$5,902,918
      
Net income127,633
 
 127,633
Other comprehensive loss
 (969) (969)
Common equity distributions(49,000) 
 (49,000)
Other(11) 
 (11)
Balance at March 31, 20195,987,693
 (7,122) 5,980,571
      
Net income183,084
 
 183,084
Other comprehensive loss
 (969) (969)
Common equity distributions(53,000) 
 (53,000)
Other(14) 
 (14)
Balance at June 30, 20196,117,763
 (8,091) 6,109,672
      
Net income255,260
 
 255,260
Other comprehensive loss
 (969) (969)
Common equity distributions(53,000) 
 (53,000)
Other(8) 
 (8)
Balance at September 30, 2019
$6,320,015
 
($9,060) 
$6,310,955
      
See Notes to Financial Statements.     



ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 Member’s
Equity
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
 (In Thousands)
      
Balance at December 31, 2016
$5,130,251
 
($48,442) 
$5,081,809
      
Net income405,141
 
 405,141
Other comprehensive loss
 (1,050) (1,050)
Distributions declared on common equity(91,250) 
 (91,250)
Other(62) 
 (62)
      
Balance at September 30, 2017
$5,444,080
 
($49,492) 
$5,394,588
      
      
Balance at December 31, 2017
$5,355,204
 
($46,400) 
$5,308,804
      
Net income514,260
 
 514,260
Other comprehensive loss
 (1,502) (1,502)
Distributions declared on common equity(56,000) 
 (56,000)
Reclassification pursuant to ASU 2018-026,262
 (10,049) (3,787)
Other3
 
 3
      
Balance at September 30, 2018
$5,819,729
 
($57,951) 
$5,761,778
      
See Notes to Financial Statements.     


ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESSELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
            
 Three Months Ended Increase/   Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$409
 
$411
 
($2) 
 
$426
 
$409
 
$17
 4
Commercial 273
 285
 (12) (4) 277
 273
 4
 1
Industrial 394
 428
 (34) (8) 376
 394
 (18) (5)
Governmental 17
 19
 (2) (11) 19
 17
 2
 12
Total billed retail 1,093
 1,143
 (50) (4) 1,098
 1,093
 5
 
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 58
 69
 (11) (16) 66
 58
 8
 14
Non-associated companies 14
 23
 (9) (39) 16
 14
 2
 14
Other 31
 45
 (14) (31) 42
 31
 11
 35
Total 
$1,196
 
$1,280
 
($84) (7) 
$1,222
 
$1,196
 
$26
 2
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 4,658
 4,301
 357
 8
 4,614
 4,658
 (44) (1)
Commercial 3,382
 3,228
 154
 5
 3,325
 3,382
 (57) (2)
Industrial 7,619
 7,627
 (8) 
 7,741
 7,619
 122
 2
Governmental 216
 208
 8
 4
 215
 216
 (1) 
Total retail 15,875
 15,364
 511
 3
 15,895
 15,875
 20
 
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 1,545
 1,164
 381
 33
 1,494
 1,545
 (51) (3)
Non-associated companies 369
 616
 (247) (40) 526
 369
 157
 43
Total 17,789
 17,144
 645
 4
 17,915
 17,789
 126
 1
                
                
 Nine Months Ended Increase/   Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$972
 
$911
 
$61
 7
 
$980
 
$972
 
$8
 1
Commercial 720
 716
 4
 1
 716
 720
 (4) (1)
Industrial 1,115
 1,147
 (32) (3) 1,108
 1,115
 (7) (1)
Governmental 51
 51
 
 
 54
 51
 3
 6
Total billed retail 2,858
 2,825
 33
 1
 2,858
 2,858
 
 
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 229
 204
 25
 12
 201
 229
 (28) (12)
Non-associated companies 44
 53
 (9) (17) 48
 44
 4
 9
Other 132
 135
 (3) (2) 146
 132
 14
 11
Total 
$3,263
 
$3,217
 
$46
 1
 
$3,253
 
$3,263
 
($10) 
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 11,221
 10,154
 1,067
 11
 10,815
 11,221
 (406) (4)
Commercial 8,781
 8,497
 284
 3
 8,564
 8,781
 (217) (2)
Industrial 22,160
 22,272
 (112) (1) 22,577
 22,160
 417
 2
Governmental 613
 595
 18
 3
 623
 613
 10
 2
Total retail 42,775
 41,518
 1,257
 3
 42,579
 42,775
 (196) 
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 4,099
 3,399
 700
 21
 3,428
 4,099
 (671) (16)
Non-associated companies 1,237
 1,280
 (43) (3) 1,433
 1,237
 196
 16
Total 48,111
 46,197
 1,914
 4
 47,440
 48,111
 (671) (1)
                

ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.LLC


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


Third Quarter2018 2019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net income increased $4.2$5.5 million primarily due to higher retail electric price and higher volume/weather, partially offset by a lowerhigher effective income tax rate partially offset byand higher other operationdepreciation and maintenanceamortization expenses.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net income increased $19.8decreased $13.5 million primarily due to ahigher depreciation and amortization expenses, lower effective income tax ratevolume/weather, higher interest expense, and higher net revenue, each after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferredtaxes other than income taxes, to customers, discussed below. The increase is partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.retail electric price.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


Third Quarter2018 2019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$367.7
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(9.8
$201.3
)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(25.8)
Retail electric price7.7
Volume/weather3.57.3

Other2019 operating revenues(0.1)
2018 net revenue

$178.9398.7


Entergy Mississippi’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers is due to the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through customer bill credits over a three-month period from July 2018 through September 2018 per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. There iswas no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenue isoperating revenues was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


144

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of July 2019, as approved by the MPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.formula rate plan filing.


The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 257 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricityincreased usage includingduring the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales.unbilled sales period.


138

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$1,037.2
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(80.7
$529.6)
Volume/weather
(8.1
)
Retail electric price9.5
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(153.025.8)
Retail electric price2019 operating revenues8.6
Volume/weather19.5
Other1.6
2018 net revenue

$406.3983.7



Entergy Mississippi’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 524 GWh, or 5%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales and a decrease in industrial usage. The decrease in industrial usage is primarily due to decreased small industrial sales.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of July 2019, as approved by the MPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers is due to a regulatory charge recorded in June 2018 that resulted in a $127.2 million reduction in net utility plant and the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through customer bill credits over a three-month period from July 2018 through September 2018 each per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. There iswas no effect on net income as the reductionsreduction in net revenue areoperating revenues was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to higher storm damage rider revenues. Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the September 2017 billing cycle and ceased billing the storm damage rider effective with the August 2018 billing cycle.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the storm damage rider.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 645 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales.


Other Income Statement Variances


Third Quarter2018 2019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Other operation and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased primarily due to:

to a $5.8 million loss in 2018 on the sale of fuel oil inventory per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Act. There is no effect on net income as the loss on the sale of fuel oil inventory is offset by a reduction in income tax expense;
an increase of $3.2 millionexpense. The decrease in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to higher long-term service agreement costs; and
an increase of $1.6 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher contract costs and write-offs of customer accounts.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes and an increase in local franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments. Local franchise taxes increased primarily due to higher revenues in the third quarter 2018 as compared to the third quarter 2017.

139

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

was significantly offset by an increase of $10.2$4 million in stormstorm damage provisions. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of storm cost recovery;recovery.

145

Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily as a result of higher depreciation rates, as approved by the MPSC, and additions to plant in service.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $4 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $3.7 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work performed during plant outages;
an increase of $3.1 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance;
an increase of $1.5 million in loss provisions; and
an increase of $1.3 million in distribution operations and asset management costs due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services.

The increase was partially offset by:

a $5.8 million loss in 2018 on the sale of fuel oil inventory per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 resulting from the stipulation related to the effects of the Tax Act. There is no effect on net income as the loss on the sale of fuel oil inventory is offset by a reduction in income tax expense; and
an increasea decrease of $2.6$5.8 million in vegetation maintenance costs;storm damage provisions. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of storm cost recovery.
an increase of $2.5 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher contract costs and write-offs of customer accounts.


Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes, and an increase inpartially offset by lower local franchise taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments.millage rates due to a rate increase effective October 2018. Local franchise taxes increaseddecreased primarily due to higherlower residential and commercial revenues in 2018 as2019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due toas a result of higher depreciation rates, as approved by the MPSC, and additions to plant in service.


Other regulatory charges include a regulatory charge recorded in second quarter 2018 to reflect the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes per an agreement approved by the MPSC in June 2018 that resulted in a reduction in net utility plant of $127.2 million. There is no effect on net income as the regulatory charge was offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $55 million of 4.52% Series mortgage bonds in December 2018 and $300 million of 3.85% Series mortgage bonds in June 2019, partially offset by the repayment, at maturity, of $150 million of 3.25%6.64% Series first mortgage bonds in November 2017.July 2019.


Income Taxes


The effective income tax rates were 22.8% for the third quarter 2019 and 21.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.


146

Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The effective income tax rate was (46.7%) for the third quarter 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


The effective income tax rate was 1,039.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, state income taxes, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rates were 37.8% for the third quarter 2017 and 38.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2017 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017. Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy and Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.



140

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flow


Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
2018 20172019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$6,096
 
$76,834

$36,954
 
$6,096
      
Cash flow provided by (used in):      
Operating activities218,024
 129,314
203,439
 218,024
Investing activities(268,165) (300,966)(276,307) (268,165)
Financing activities44,090
 94,867
134,850
 44,090
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(6,051) (76,785)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents61,982
 (6,051)
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$45
 
$49

$98,936
 
$45


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $88.7decreased $14.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:

the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
$26.2 million in proceeds from the sale of fuel oil inventory in 2018;
the effect of favorable weather on billed sales;
the timing of collection of storm damage rider revenues. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the storm damage rider; and
a decreasean increase of $7.9$6.2 million in storm spending in 2018.2019.



147

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The increasedecrease was partially offset by:


the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers;customers in 2018;
income tax refundsthe timing of $15.1 million in 2017. Entergy Mississippi received state income tax refundsrecovery of $15.1 million in 2017 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement resulting from the carryback of net operating losses;fuel and purchased power costs; and
a decrease of $7 million in pension contributions in 2019 as compared to 2018. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.
an increase of $6.2 million in interest paid in 2018 resulting from an increase in interest expense.


Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $32.8increased $8.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:

an increase of $20.3 million primarily due to a decreaseinvestment in the infrastructure of $48.8Entergy Mississippi’s distribution system, including increased spending on advanced metering infrastructure;
an increase of $15.1 million in storm spending in 2019; and
an increase of $12.9 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a lowerhigher scope of work performed in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017 and a decrease of $13.3 million in storm spending in 2018.

The decreaseincrease was partially offset by:

by money pool activity;activity.
an increase of $7.5 million in information technology construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various technology projects; and
an increase of $7.3 million related to facility site improvements.


Decreases in Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $32.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to decreasing by $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,

141

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

2018 compared to decreasing by $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. 2018. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $50.8increased $90.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to money pool activity.the issuance of $300 million of 3.85% Series mortgage bonds in June 2019. The decreaseincrease was partially offset by a decreasethe repayment, at maturity, of $10.5$150 million of 6.64% Series mortgage bonds in common stock dividends paidJuly 2019 and money pool activity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in 2018 resulting from Entergy Mississippi’s routine evaluation of its ability to pay dividends basedthe Form 10-K for more details on historical and planned capital investments and an increase in advances received from customers for transmission projects.long-term debt.


Increases in Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool increased by $33.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to increasing by $106.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018.


Capital Structure


Entergy Mississippi’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Mississippi is primarily due to an increase in retained earnings.
September 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017
September 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018
Debt to capital49.3% 51.5%51.5% 50.6%
Effect of subtracting cash% (0.2%)(1.7%) (0.7%)
Net debt to net capital49.3% 51.3%49.8% 49.9%


Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings, financing lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Mississippi uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing

148

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition.  Entergy Mississippi uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Mississippi’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resourcesin the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Mississippi is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $1.7$1.5 billion in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the Choctaw Generating Station, discussed below;Sunflower Solar Facility; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; resource planning, including potential generation projects; system improvements; software and security; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.

142

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Entergy Mississippi’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
September 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017 
September 30,
2017
 December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
($33,816) $1,633 ($106,180) $10,595
September 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018 
September 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017
(In Thousands)
$8,899 $41,380 ($33,816) $1,633


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

In May 2018, Entergy Mississippi renewedhas three of its four separate credit facilities through May 2019, decreasingin the aggregate amount available for borrowing under the credit facilitiesof $82.5 million scheduled to $82.5 million.expire in May 2020. No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of September 30, 2018.2019.  In addition, Entergy Mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of September 30, 2018, $11.22019, $8.1 million of letters of credit were outstanding under Entergy Mississippi’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


In October 2019, Entergy Mississippi received a capital contribution of $130 million in anticipation of Entergy Mississippi’s purchase of the Choctaw Generating Station.

Choctaw Generating Station


In August 2018, Entergy Mississippi announced that it signed an asset purchase agreement to acquire from a subsidiary of GenOn Energy Inc. the Choctaw Generating Station, an 810 MW natural gas fired combined-cycle turbine plant located near French Camp, Mississippi.  The purchase price is expected to be approximately $314 million.  Entergy Mississippi also expects to invest in various plant upgrades at the facility after closing and expects the total cost of the acquisition to be approximately $401 million.  The purchase iswas contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including full cost recovery, from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  These includeincluded regulatory approvals from the MPSC and the FERC, as well as clearanceFERC. Clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.Act has occurred. In September 2019 the FERC approved the acquisition.  In October 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. In a separate

149

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

filing in October 2018, Entergy Mississippi proposed revisions to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism, the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costs of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the non-fuel annual ownership costs of the Choctaw Generating Station, as well as to allow similar cost recovery treatment for other future capacity additions approved by the MPSC. Entergy Mississippi executed a joint stipulation as to all issues with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and, in October 2019, the MPSC adopted the joint stipulation which approved Entergy Mississippi’s request to acquire, own, operate, improve, and maintain the facility. The MPSC approved the expected total cost of the acquisition of approximately $401 million and authorized Entergy Mississippi to recover acquisition and ownership costs of the facility through its formula rate plan, including costs incurred before the effective date of the interim capacity rate mechanism, which Entergy Mississippi expects to be approved later this year. Entergy Mississippi purchased the plant in October 2019.

Sunflower Solar Facility

In November 2018, Entergy Mississippi announced that it signed an agreement for the purchase of an approximately 100 MW to-be-constructed solar photovoltaic facility that will be sited on approximately 1,000 acres in Sunflower County, Mississippi.  The estimated base purchase price is approximately $138.4 million.  The estimated total investment, including the base purchase price and other related costs, for Entergy Mississippi to acquire the Sunflower Solar Facility is approximately $153.2 million. The purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including full cost recovery, from applicable federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.  The project will be built by Sunflower County Solar Project, LLC, a sub-subsidiary of Recurrent Energy, LLC. Entergy Mississippi will purchase the facility upon mechanical completion and after the other purchase contingencies have been met.  In December 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed a joint petition with Sunflower Solar Project at the MPSC for Sunflower Solar Project to construct and for Entergy Mississippi to acquire and thereafter own, operate, improve, and maintain the solar facility.  Entergy Mississippi has proposed revisions to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism, the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism, in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costs of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the annual ownership costs of the Sunflower Solar Facility. In August 2019 consultants retained by the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff filed a report expressing concerns regarding the project economics and recommended that, should the MPSC wish to approve the project, Entergy Mississippi should be required to guarantee the energy output of the unit. Entergy Mississippi and the Staff are engaged in settlement discussions to address these concerns.  A hearing before the MPSC is targeted to occur in the fourth quarter of 2019. Closing is expectedtargeted to occur by the end of 2019. 2021.


State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.

Mississippi Attorney General Complaint


As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi Attorney General filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, and breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The defendants have deniedEntergy believes the allegations.complaint is unfounded. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery ended in May 2018. In June 2018, Entergy filed motions for summary judgment, which are currently pending before the District Court. In July 2018 the Attorney General filed briefs opposing the summary judgment.

In September 2018 the District Court held oral arguments on the Entergy companies’ motion to strikeDecember 2008 the Attorney General’s jury demand. At the hearing, the Attorney General withdrew his oppositionlawsuit was removed to the Entergy

143

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

companies’ motion to strike the Attorney General’s jury demand.U.S. District Court in Jackson, Mississippi. Pre-trial and settlement conferences were held in October 2018. In October 2018 the District Court rescheduled the trial to April 2019. In April 2019 the District Court remanded the Attorney General’s lawsuit to the Hinds County Chancery Court in Jackson, Mississippi. A hearing on procedural and dispositive motions was held in August 2019. Following the parties’ oral arguments, the Attorney General filed a post hearing brief, to which Entergy Mississippi filed a response. The motions remain pending before the chancellor of the Hinds County Chancery Court.



150

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Formula Rate Plan


In March 2018,2019, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 20182019 test year filing and 20172018 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return for the historical 20172018 calendar year to be above the formula rate plan bandwidth and projected earned return for the 20182019 calendar year in large part asto be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2019 test year filing shows a result$36.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s earned return on common equity to the specified point of the lower federal corporate income taxadjustment of 6.94% return on rate effective in 2018, to bebase, within the formula rate plan bandwidth. The 2018 look-back filing compares actual 2018 results to the approved benchmark return on rate base and shows a $10.1 million interim decrease in formula rate plan revenues is necessary. In the fourth quarter 2018, Entergy Mississippi recorded a provision of $9.3 million that reflected the estimate of the difference between the 2018 expected earned rate of return on rate base and an established performance-adjusted benchmark rate of return under the formula rate plan performance-adjusted bandwidth resultingmechanism. In the first quarter 2019, Entergy Mississippi recorded an increase of $0.8 million in no changethe provision to reflect the amount shown in rates.the look-back filing. In June 2018,2019, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a joint stipulation that confirmed that the 2019 test year filing showed that a $32.8 million rate increase is necessary to reset Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for bothreturn on common equity to the 2017 look-back filing and 2018 test year werespecified point of adjustment of 6.93% return on rate base, within the respective formula rate plan bandwidths. In June 2018 the MPSC approved the stipulation, which resulted in no change in rates. See Note 2bandwidth. Additionally, pursuant to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the proposed treatment of the effects of the lower federal corporate income tax rate.

joint stipulation, Entergy Mississippi’s formula rate plan includes a2018 look-back evaluation report filing in March 2019 that will compare actual 2018 results to the performance-adjusted allowed return on rate base.  To the extent that Entergy Mississippi expects this look-back evaluation report to show the 2018reflected an earned return on rate base exceededof 7.81% in calendar year 2018 which is above the look-back benchmark return on rate base of 7.13%, resulting in an $11 million decrease in formula rate plan performance-adjusted bandwidth,revenues on an interim basis through June 2020. In the second quarter 2019, Entergy Mississippi will record a regulatory provisionrecorded an additional $0.9 million increase in the fourth quarter 2018.

In October 2018, Entergy Mississippi proposed revisionsprovision to its formula rate plan that would provide for a mechanism,reflect the interim capacity rate adjustment mechanism,$11 million shown in the formula rate plan to recover the non-fuel related costs of additional owned capacity acquired by Entergy Mississippi, including the non-fuel annual ownership costs of the Choctaw Generating Station, as well as to allow similar cost recovery treatment for other future capacity additions approved by the MPSC.

Internal Restructuring

In March 2018, Entergy Mississippi filed an application with the MPSC seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy Mississippi to a new entity, which would ultimately be held by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. Entergy Mississippi proposed in its application to credit retail customers $27 million over six years, beginning in 2019, if the restructuring closed on or before December 1, 2018. In September 2018, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into and filed a joint stipulation regarding the restructuringlook-back filing. In September 2018 the MPSC issued an order accepting the stipulation in its entirety and approving the restructuring and credits to retail customers of $27 million over six years, consisting of annual payments of $4.5 million for the years 2019-2024. Entergy Mississippi has also received the required FERC and NRC approvals. Entergy Mississippi expects the restructuring will be consummated on or before December 1, 2018.

It is currently contemplated that Entergy Mississippi would undertake a multi-step restructuring, which would include the following:

Entergy Mississippi would redeem its outstanding preferred stock, at the aggregate redemption price of approximately $21.2 million, including call premiums, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any.
Entergy Mississippi would convert from a Mississippi corporation to a Texas corporation.
Under the Texas Business Organizations Code (TXBOC), Entergy Mississippi will allocate substantially all of its assets to a new subsidiary, Entergy Mississippi Power and Light, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (Entergy Mississippi Power and Light), and Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will assume substantially all of the liabilities of Entergy Mississippi, in a transaction regarded as a merger under the TXBOC. Entergy Mississippi will remain in existence and hold the membership interests in Entergy Mississippi Power and Light.

144

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Mississippi will contribute the membership interests in Entergy Mississippi Power and Light to an affiliate (Entergy Utility Holding Company, LLC, a Texas limited liability company and subsidiary of Entergy Corporation). As a result of the contribution, Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entergy Utility Holding Company, LLC.
Entergy Mississippi will change its name to Entergy Utility Enterprises, Inc., and Entergy Mississippi Power and Light will then change its name to Entergy Mississippi, LLC.

Upon the completion of the restructuring, Entergy Mississippi, LLC will hold substantially all of the assets, and will have assumed substantially all of the liabilities, of Entergy Mississippi. Entergy Mississippi may modify or supplement the steps to be taken to effectuate the restructuring.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filings

See the Form 10-K for discussion of the MPSC order finding that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interest and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity. In June 2018, as part of the order approving the joint stipulation between the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi addressing Entergy Mississippi’s 2018 formula rate plan evaluation report and the ratemaking effects of the Tax Act,2019 the MPSC approved the accelerationjoint stipulation with rates effective for the first billing cycle of the recovery of substantially all of Entergy Mississippi’s existing customer meters in anticipation of AMI deployment.July 2019.


Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators


As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Mississippi has approval from the MPSC to collect a storm damage provision of $1.75 million per month. If Entergy Mississippi’s accumulated storm damage provision balance exceeds $15 million, the collection of the storm damage provision ceases until such time that the accumulated storm damage provision becomes less than $10 million. As of June 30, 2018,May 31, 2019, Entergy Mississippi’s storm damage provision balance exceeded $15was less than $10 million. Accordingly, Entergy Mississippi resumed billing the monthly storm damage provision was reset to zero beginningeffective with August 2018July 2019 bills.


Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.



151

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, LLC
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


145

Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for furthera discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$367,734
 
$349,197
 
$1,037,166
 
$898,852
 
$398,732
 
$367,734
 
$983,713
 
$1,037,166
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 78,533
 61,681
 207,724
 146,869
 87,386
 78,533
 188,006
 207,724
Purchased power 104,787
 90,086
 289,397
 236,409
 78,286
 104,787
 223,461
 289,397
Other operation and maintenance 69,936
 56,713
 193,979
 170,337
 69,253
 69,936
 195,357
 193,979
Taxes other than income taxes 26,024
 23,568
 75,212
 71,518
 26,673
 26,024
 78,613
 75,212
Depreciation and amortization 37,752
 36,176
 114,293
 106,935
 44,339
 37,752
 123,145
 114,293
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net 5,487
 (3,840) 133,715
 (13,983)
Other regulatory charges - net 5,771
 5,487
 11,708
 133,715
TOTAL 322,519
 264,384
 1,014,320
 718,085
 311,708
 322,519
 820,290
 1,014,320
                
OPERATING INCOME 45,215
 84,813
 22,846
 180,767
 87,024
 45,215
 163,423
 22,846
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,251
 2,566
 6,351
 6,741
 2,079
 2,251
 6,341
 6,351
Interest and investment income 1
 
 26
 33
 462
 1
 1,011
 26
Miscellaneous - net 116
 (832) (1,866) (2,894) (1,648) 116
 (2,238) (1,866)
TOTAL 2,368
 1,734
 4,511
 3,880
 893
 2,368
 5,114
 4,511
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 13,950
 12,713
 41,916
 37,953
 15,922
 13,950
 45,804
 41,916
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (944) (1,048) (2,662) (2,681) (892) (944) (2,683) (2,662)
TOTAL 13,006
 11,665
 39,254
 35,272
 15,030
 13,006
 43,121
 39,254
                
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 34,577
 74,882
 (11,897) 149,375
 72,887
 34,577
 125,416
 (11,897)
                
Income taxes (16,156) 28,337
 (123,715) 57,369
 16,650
 (16,156) 27,114
 (123,715)
                
NET INCOME 50,733
 46,545
 111,818
 92,006
 56,237
 50,733
 98,302
 111,818
                
Preferred dividend requirements and other 238
 238
 715
 715
 
 238
 
 715
                
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$50,495
 
$46,307
 
$111,103
 
$91,291
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY 
$56,237
 
$50,495
 
$98,302
 
$111,103
                
See Notes to Financial Statements.                





(Page left blank intentionally)


ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income 
$111,818
 
$92,006
 
$98,302
 
$111,818
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization 114,293
 106,935
 123,145
 114,293
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 40,537
 65,204
 32,596
 40,537
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Receivables (49,456) (31,085) (37,843) (49,456)
Fuel inventory 33,705
 8,059
 (3,872) 33,705
Accounts payable (9,845) (2,644) (574) (9,845)
Taxes accrued (24,280) (5,815) (26,556) (24,280)
Interest accrued (4,767) (2,366) 2,093
 (4,767)
Deferred fuel costs 9,826
 (27,344) 47,569
 9,826
Other working capital accounts (8,348) (279) 533
 (8,348)
Provisions for estimated losses 7,894
 (10,274) (3,099) 7,894
Other regulatory assets 26,060
 (33,323) (923) 26,060
Other regulatory liabilities (139,063) (5,118) (16,615) (139,063)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (15,987) (18,863) (6,930) (15,987)
Other assets and liabilities 125,637
 (5,779) (4,387) 125,637
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 218,024
 129,314
 203,439
 218,024
        
INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Construction expenditures (275,189) (313,910) (314,622) (275,189)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 6,351
 6,741
 6,341
 6,351
Changes in money pool receivable - net 1,633
 10,595
 32,481
 1,633
Change in other investments 
 (3,185)
Other (960) (1,207) (507) (960)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (268,165) (300,966) (276,307) (268,165)
        
FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 292,763
 
Retirement of long-term debt (150,000) 
Changes in money pool payable - net 33,816
 106,180
 
 33,816
Dividends paid:    
Common stock 
 (10,500)
Distributions/dividends paid:    
Preferred stock (715) (715) 
 (715)
Other 10,989
 (98) (7,913) 10,989
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 44,090
 94,867
 134,850
 44,090
        
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (6,051) (76,785)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 61,982
 (6,051)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 6,096
 76,834
 36,954
 6,096
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$45
 
$49
 
$98,936
 
$45
        
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Cash paid during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$44,781
 
$38,549
 
$41,753
 
$44,781
Income taxes 
$—
 
($15,087)
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
BALANCE SHEETSASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Cash 
$38
 
$1,607
 
$11
 
$11
Temporary cash investments 7
 4,489
 98,925
 36,943
Total cash and cash equivalents 45
 6,096
 98,936
 36,954
Accounts receivable:  
  
  
  
Customer 102,986
 72,039
 98,245
 73,205
Allowance for doubtful accounts (830) (574) (615) (563)
Associated companies 54,578
 45,081
 19,217
 51,065
Other 16,294
 9,738
 10,173
 8,647
Accrued unbilled revenues 55,335
 54,256
 60,867
 50,171
Total accounts receivable 228,363
 180,540
 187,887
 182,525
Deferred fuel costs 22,618
 32,444
 
 8,016
Fuel inventory - at average cost 11,901
 45,606
 15,803
 11,931
Materials and supplies - at average cost 46,041
 42,571
 51,049
 47,255
Prepayments and other 10,674
 7,041
 8,694
 9,365
TOTAL 319,642
 314,298
 362,369
 296,046
        
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS  
  
  
  
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 4,580
 4,592
 4,564
 4,576
Storm reserve escrow account 32,284
 31,969
 32,953
 32,447
TOTAL 36,864
 36,561
 37,517
 37,023
        
UTILITY PLANT  
  
  
  
Electric 4,624,415
 4,660,297
 4,981,082
 4,780,720
Property under capital lease 
 125
Construction work in progress 181,766
 149,367
 177,221
 128,149
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 4,806,181
 4,809,789
 5,158,303
 4,908,869
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,652,552
 1,681,306
 1,681,597
 1,641,821
UTILITY PLANT - NET 3,153,629
 3,128,483
 3,476,706
 3,267,048
        
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS  
  
  
  
Regulatory assets:  
  
  
  
Other regulatory assets 371,849
 397,909
 343,972
 343,049
Other 4,859
 2,124
 12,161
 3,638
TOTAL 376,708
 400,033
 356,133
 346,687
        
TOTAL ASSETS 
$3,886,843
 
$3,879,375
 
$4,232,725
 
$3,946,804
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  
  
  

ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
BALANCE SHEETSLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
  
  
  
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$150,000
 
$—
 
$—
 
$150,000
Accounts payable:  
  
  
  
Associated companies 67,933
 55,689
 41,323
 42,928
Other 80,909
 77,326
 81,260
 79,117
Customer deposits 84,260
 83,654
 86,295
 85,085
Taxes accrued 58,563
 82,843
 50,996
 77,552
Interest accrued 18,134
 22,901
 22,324
 20,231
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 9,262
 
Deferred fuel costs 39,553
 
Other 10,169
 12,785
 17,717
 7,526
TOTAL 479,230
 335,198
 339,468
 462,439
        
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES  
  
  
  
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 533,861
 488,806
 591,105
 551,869
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 8,747
 8,867
 10,066
 10,186
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 239,118
 411,011
 239,630
 246,402
Other regulatory liabilities 23,779
 33,622
Asset retirement cost liabilities 9,977
 9,219
 9,594
 9,206
Accumulated provisions 52,658
 44,764
 48,043
 51,142
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 85,509
 101,498
 86,036
 93,100
Long-term debt 1,120,830
 1,270,122
 1,469,454
 1,175,750
Other 47,559
 11,639
 25,022
 20,862
TOTAL 2,098,259
 2,345,926
 2,502,729
 2,192,139
        
Commitments and Contingencies  
  
  
  
        
Preferred stock without sinking fund 20,381
 20,381
    
COMMON EQUITY  
  
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2018 and 2017 199,326
 199,326
Capital stock expense and other 167
 167
Retained earnings 1,089,480
 978,377
EQUITY  
  
Member's equity 1,390,528
 1,292,226
TOTAL 1,288,973
 1,177,870
 1,390,528
 1,292,226
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$3,886,843
 
$3,879,375
 
$4,232,725
 
$3,946,804
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  
  
  



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
(Unaudited)
    
 Common Equity  
 
Common
Stock
 
Capital Stock
Expense and
Other
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
 (In Thousands)
        
Balance at December 31, 2016
$199,326
 
$167
 
$895,298
 
$1,094,791
        
Net income
 
 92,006
 92,006
Common stock dividends
 
 (10,500) (10,500)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (715) (715)
        
Balance at September 30, 2017
$199,326
 
$167
 
$976,089
 
$1,175,582
        
        
Balance at December 31, 2017
$199,326
 
$167
 
$978,377
 
$1,177,870
        
Net income
 
 111,818
 111,818
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (715) (715)
        
Balance at September 30, 2018
$199,326
 
$167
 
$1,089,480
 
$1,288,973
        
See Notes to Financial Statements. 
  
  
  
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
Member's Equity
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2017
$1,177,870
Net income22,843
Preferred stock dividends(238)
Balance at March 31, 20181,200,475
Net income38,242
Preferred stock dividends(239)
Balance at June 30, 20181,238,478
Net income50,733
Preferred stock dividends(238)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$1,288,973
Balance at December 31, 2018
$1,292,226
Net income15,398
Balance at March 31, 20191,307,624
Net income26,667
Balance at June 30, 20191,334,291
Net income56,237
Balance at September 30, 2019
$1,390,528
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
            
 Three Months Ended Increase/   Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$170
 
$158
 
$12
 8
 
$178
 
$170
 
$8
 5
Commercial 127
 121
 6
 5
 132
 127
 5
 4
Industrial 44
 41
 3
 7
 44
 44
 
 
Governmental 12
 11
 1
 9
 12
 12
 
 
Total billed retail 353
 331
 22
 7
 366
 353
 13
 4
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 8
 4
 4
 100
 10
 8
 2
 25
Other 7
 14
 (7) (50) 23
 7
 16
 229
Total 
$368
 
$349
 
$19
 5
 
$399
 
$368
 
$31
 8
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential 1,899
 1,747
 152
 9
 1,832
 1,899
 (67) (4)
Commercial 1,475
 1,407
 68
 5
 1,403
 1,475
 (72) (5)
Industrial 692
 665
 27
 4
 654
 692
 (38) (5)
Governmental 128
 118
 10
 8
 126
 128
 (2) (2)
Total retail 4,194
 3,937
 257
 7
 4,015
 4,194
 (179) (4)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 303
 251
 52
 21
 472
 303
 169
 56
Total 4,497
 4,188
 309
 7
 4,487
 4,497
 (10) 
                
                
 Nine Months Ended Increase/  
 Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %

 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)  
 (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential 
$451
 
$380
 
$71
 19
 
$423
 
$451
 
($28) (6)
Commercial 355
 314
 41
 13
 332
 355
 (23) (6)
Industrial 133
 115
 18
 16
 121
 133
 (12) (9)
Governmental 34
 30
 4
 13
 33
 34
 (1) (3)
Total billed retail 973
 839
 134
 16
 909
 973
 (64) (7)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 21
 16
 5
 31
 19
 21
 (2) (10)
Other 43
 44
 (1) (2) 56
 43
 13
 30
Total 
$1,037
 
$899
 
$138
 15
 
$984
 
$1,037
 
($53) (5)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 4,547
 4,072
 475
 12
 4,307
 4,547
 (240) (5)
Commercial 3,722
 3,611
 111
 3
 3,548
 3,722
 (174) (5)
Industrial 1,916
 1,869
 47
 3
 1,808
 1,916
 (108) (6)
Governmental 329
 317
 12
 4
 327
 329
 (2) (1)
Total retail 10,514
 9,869
 645
 7
 9,990
 10,514
 (524) (5)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 903
 744
 159
 21
 852
 903
 (51) (6)
Total 11,417
 10,613
 804
 8
 10,842
 11,417
 (575) (5)



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net income increased $2.9$3.5 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate and higher net revenue, after excluding the effect of the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers which is offset in income taxes,volume/weather, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net income increased $6.2decreased $3.6 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax ratehigher other operation and higher net revenue,maintenance expenses, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.income.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$200.2
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(19.1
$88.3)
Volume/weather
5.2

Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(9.07.9)
Volume/weather2019 operating revenues1.0
Retail electric price2.3
Other(0.9)
2018 net revenue

$81.7194.2



Entergy New Orleans’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted fromvariance is due to a decrease in the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through the fuel adjustment clause beginningclause. In the third quarter 2019, $1.1 million was returned to customers as compared to $9 million in Julythe third quarter 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenueoperating revenues in each period is offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 111 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and a 1% increase in the average number of electric customers.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider primarily due to higher credits to customers in 2017 as part of the Entergy New Orleans internal restructuring agreement in principle, partially offset by a decrease in the revenue requirement related to Power Block


154160

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


1 of the Union Power Station. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the credits associated with Entergy New Orleans’s internal restructuring.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
2017 net revenue2018 operating revenues

$237.8566.9

Volume/weather9.3
Net gas revenue2.4
Retail electric priceFuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income(2.540.6)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers(9.06.9)
Other2019 operating revenues2.0
2018 net revenue

$240.0533.2



The volume/weather variance is primarily dueEntergy New Orleans’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to an increase of 250 GWh, or 6%, in billed electricity usage, includingrecover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the effect of more favorable weather on residentialrevenues and commercial salesexpenses associated with these items generally offset and a 1% increase indo not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the average number of electric customers.

The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales.associated with these items.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to regulatory charges of $4.1 million recorded in 2018 as a result of an agreement with the City Council to return the benefits of the lower federal income tax rate in 2018 to customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory proceedings.


The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted fromvariance is due to a decrease in the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through the fuel adjustment clause beginningclause. In the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $2.1 million was returned to customers as compared to $9 million in Julythe nine months ended September 30, 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in net revenueoperating revenues in each period is offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


Other Income Statement Variances


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:


an increase of $1.8$1.1 million in energy efficiency costs;loss provisions;
an increase of $0.9$1 million in spending on customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement; and
an increase of $0.9 million in information technology costsprimarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance.

The increase was partially offset by several individually insignificant items.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $4.8 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to a system conversion for Algiers customers;
an increase of $2.4 million in spending on customer initiatives to higher software maintenance costsexplore new technologies and higher contract costs;services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $0.8$1.4 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract costslabor; and write-offs
an increase of customer accounts.$1.3 million in energy efficiency costs.




155161

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

anThe increase was partially offset by a decrease of $3.3 million in energy efficiency costs;
an increase of $3$1.8 million in distribution expenses primarily due to higherlower contract labor costs, including an increase resulting from the timing of storm hardening work as compared to the prior year;costs.
an increase of $1.6 million in customer service costs
Other income increased primarily due to higher contract costs and write-offs of customer accounts;
an increase in allowance for equity funds used during construction resulting from higher construction work in progress in 2019, including the New Orleans Power Station project.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates were 3.6% for the third quarter 2019 and 10.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of $1.2 million in information technology costs21% were primarily due to higher software maintenance coststhe amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes, certain book and higher contract costs;tax differences related to utility plant items, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes and the provision for uncertain tax positions. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
an increase of $1.1 million in loss provisions.

Income Taxes


The effective income tax rates were (20.0%) for the third quarter 2018 and 7.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2018 and the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and flow-through tax accounting, partially offset by state income taxes. See Notes 2 andNote 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rates were 36.6% for the third quarter 2017 and 36.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2017 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.


Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017.  Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion.  Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy and Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.



156

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$19,677
 
$32,741
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities77,433
 100,327
Investing activities(136,817) (133,233)
Financing activities39,733
 33,085
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(19,651) 179
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$26
 
$32,920


162

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$32,741
 
$103,068
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities100,327
 84,240
Investing activities(133,233) (116,704)
Financing activities33,085
 (41,722)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents179
 (74,186)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$32,920
 
$28,882


Operating Activities


Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $16.1decreased $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors, partially offset by the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.vendors.


Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $16.5$3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to:


an increase of $54.4$13.6 million in fossil-fueled generationdistribution construction expenditures primarily due to higherinvestment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy New Orleans’s distribution system, including increased spending on the New Orleans Power Station project in 2018;advanced metering infrastructure; and
an increase of $14.2$13.4 million in distributiontransmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017,2018, including investment in the reliability and infrastructure of Entergy New Orleans’s distribution system.system reliability and infrastructure.


The increase was partially offset by money pool activity and a $10.6decrease of $7.6 million decrease in stormfossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to lower spending on the New Orleans Power Station in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018.


Decreases in Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool decreased $22 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to decreasing $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to increasing $32.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Entergy New Orleans’sNet cash flow provided by financing activities provided $33.1increased $6.6 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to using $41.7 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to money pool activity and $23.8 million in common equity distributions in 2018, partially offset by the issuance of $60 million of 4.51% Series first mortgage bonds in September 2018 and a decrease of $12.4 million in2018. There were no common equity distributions made in 2018 as compared to 2017. Common equity distributions were lower in 2018 primarily as a result of the construction of the New Orleans Power Station, as discussed below, and2019 in anticipation of the excess accumulated deferred income taxes to be returned to customers as a result of the enactment of the Taxplanned capital investments.


157

Table of Contents
Increases in Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. See Note 2Orleans’s payable to the financial statements hereinmoney pool are a source of cash flow, and in the Form 10-K for discussion of regulatory proceedings relatedEntergy New Orleans’s payable to the enactment ofmoney pool increased $46.3 million for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Capital Structure


Entergy New Orleans’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The increasedecrease in the debt to capital ratio is primarily due to the issuance of long-term debtincrease in 2018.member’s equity in 2019.
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Debt to capital52.6% 51.3%49.5% 52.1%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds(3.8%) (4.7%)(3.3%) (3.5%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)48.8% 46.6%46.2% 48.6%
Effect of subtracting cash(2.0%) (2.4%)% (1.2%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)46.8% 44.2%46.2% 47.4%


(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans.



163

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings, financing lease obligations, long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion, and the long-term payable due to an associated company.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy New Orleans uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy New Orleans also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy New Orleans’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.  


Entergy New Orleans is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $600$585 million in capital investments during that period.  The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the New Orleans Power Station discussed below;and New Orleans Solar Station; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; system improvements; software and security; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy New Orleans’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
September 30,
 2018
 
December 31,
2017
 
September 30,
 2017
 
December 31,
2016
(In Thousands)
$2,116 $12,723 $46,282 $14,215
September 30,
 2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
September 30,
 2018
 
December 31,
2017
(In Thousands)
($46,318) $22,016 $2,116 $12,723


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

158

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Entergy New Orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $25 million scheduled to expire in November 2018.2021. The credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2018,2019, there were no cash borrowings and a $0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility. In addition, Entergy New Orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of September 30, 2018,2019, a $2.1$1 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy New Orleans’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.

Gas Infrastructure Rebuild Plan

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016, Entergy New Orleans submitted to the City Council a request for authorization for Entergy New Orleans to proceed with annual incremental capital funding of $12.5 million for its gas infrastructure rebuild plan and proposed that recovery of the investment be determined in connection with its next base rate case. The City Council authorized Entergy New Orleans to proceed with its replacement plans and established a schedule for proceedings in advance of the rate case intended to provide an opportunity for evaluation of the gas infrastructure plan that would best serve the public interest and the effect on customers of the approval of any such plan. In the course of that proceeding, the City Council’s advisors submitted pre-filed testimony recommending that Entergy New Orleans be allowed to continue with its conditioned-based approach to gas pipeline replacement to replace approximately 238 miles of low pressure pipe at a rate of approximately 25 miles per year. The City Council’s advisors also recommended that Entergy New Orleans be required to adhere to certain reporting requirements and recognized the need to address the sustained level of investment in gas infrastructure on customer bills. In September 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed rebuttal testimony suggesting that its recovery of future investment and customer effects would be addressed in the rate case that Entergy New Orleans was required to file in July 2018. The procedural schedule was suspended in order to allow for resolution of the proceeding.


New Orleans Power Station


As discussed in the Form 10-K, inIn June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility.facility, which was retired effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million. In addition, the application renewed the commitment

164

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans. In March 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution approving construction of the 128 MW unit. The targeted commercial operation date is Spring 2020,mid-2020, subject to receipt of all necessary permits by the end of November 2018. permits.

In April 2018 intervenors opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station filed with the City Council a request for rehearing, which was subsequently denied, and a petition for judicial review of the City Council’s decision, and also filed a lawsuit challenging the City Council’s approval based on Louisiana’s open meeting law. In May 2018 the City Council announced that it would initiate an investigation into allegations that Entergy New Orleans, Entergy, or some other entity paid or participated in paying certain attendees and speakers in support of the New Orleans Power Station to attend or speak at certain meetings organized by the City Council. In June 2018, Entergy New Orleans produced documents in response to a City Council resolution relating to this investigation. The City Council issued a request for qualifications for an investigator and in June 2018 selected two investigators. In October 2018 the investigators for the City Council released their report, concluding that individuals were paid to attend and/or speak in support of the New Orleans Power Station and that Entergy New Orleans “knew or should have known that such conduct occurred or reasonably might occur.”  The City Council held a special meeting on October 31, 2018 to allow the investigators to present the report and for the City Council to consider next steps.  At that meeting, the City Council issued a resolution requiring Entergy New Orleans to show cause why it should not be fined $5 million as a result of the findings in the report. AIn November 2018, Entergy New Orleans submitted its response to the show cause resolution, is due within 30 days from issuance of the certified resolution. Entergy New Orleans disagreesdisagreeing with certain characterizations and omissions of fact in the report and submittedasserting that the City Council could not legally impose the proposed fine.  Simultaneous with the filing of its response to the show cause resolution, Entergy New Orleans sent a letter to the City Council re-asserting that the City Council’s imposition of the proposed fine would be unlawful, but acknowledging that the actions of a subcontractor, which was retained by an Entergy New Orleans contractor without the knowledge or contractually-required consent of Entergy New Orleans, were contrary to Entergy’s values.  In that letter, Entergy New Orleans offered to donate $5 million to the City Council to resolve the show cause proceeding.  In January 2019, Entergy New Orleans submitted a new settlement proposal to the City Council. The proposal retained the components of the first offer but added to it a commitment to make reasonable efforts to limit the costs of the project to the $210 million cost estimate with advanced notification of anticipated cost overruns, additional reporting requirements for cost and environmental items, and a commitment regarding reliability investment and to work with the New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board to provide a reliable source of power. In February 2019 the City Council approved a resolution approving the settlement proposal and allowing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station to commence.


Also in February 2019, certain intervenors in the City Council proceeding on the New Orleans Power Station filed suit in Louisiana state court challenging the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality’s issuance of the New Orleans Power Station’s air permit. Entergy New Orleans intervened in that lawsuit and, along with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, filed exceptions seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. In June 2019 the state court judge sustained the exceptions and dismissed the plaintiffs’ petition with prejudice. Also in June 2019, a state court judge in New Orleans affirmed the City Council’s approval of the New Orleans Power Station and dismissed the petition for judicial review that had been filed in April 2018. The petitioners have filed an appeal of that ruling. Also in June 2019, with regard to the lawsuit challenging the City Council’s decision on the basis of a violation of the open meetings law, the same state court judge in New Orleans ruled that there was a violation of the open meetings law at the February 2018 meeting of the City Council’s Utilities, Cable, Telecommunications and Technology Committee at which that Committee considered the New Orleans Power Station approval, and further ruled that, although there was no violation of the open meetings law at the March 2018 full City Council meeting at which the New Orleans Power Station was approved, both the approval of the Committee and the approval of the full City Council were void. The City Council and Entergy New Orleans have each filed a suspensive appeal of the open meetings law ruling. A suspensive appeal suspends the effect of the judgment in the open meetings law proceeding while the appeal is being taken. The petitioners sought in the state appellate court, and then at the Louisiana Supreme Court, to terminate the suspension of the effect of the judgment, but both courts declined to do so. Appellate briefing on the merits both in the open meetings law appeal and in the judicial review appeal is scheduled to begin in November 2019. The New Orleans Power Station related settlement that was approved by the full City Council in February 2019 and that allowed Entergy New Orleans to move forward with the construction of the New Orleans Power Station was not affected by the state court judge’s open meetings ruling. Construction of the plant is underway and continuing.


159165

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis



Renewables


InAs discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council requesting approval of three utility-scale solar projects totaling 90 MW. If approved,In December 2018 the resource additions will allowCity Council advisors requested that Entergy New Orleans pursue alternative deal structures for the Washington Parish project and attempt to make significant progress towards meeting its voluntary commitment toreduce costs for the City Council to add up to 10020 MW of renewable energy resources.  The three projects include constructing a self-build solar plant in Orleans Parish with an outputproject. As a result of 20 MW, acquiring asettlement discussions, in March 2019, Entergy New Orleans revised its application to convert the build-own transfer acquisition of the 50 MW solar facility in Washington Parish through a build-own-transfer acquisition, and procuring 20 MW of solar power from a project to be built in St. James Parish through a power purchase agreement. In August 2018June 2019 the parties to the proceeding executed a stipulated settlement term sheet, which recommends that the City Council approve Entergy New Orleans’s revised application as to all three projects. In July 2019 the City Council approved a procedural schedule opening discovery that is designed to encourage settlement by December 2018.the stipulated settlement.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filings

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2018 the City Council approved Entergy New Orleans’s application seeking a finding that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest.  Deployment of the information technology infrastructure began in 2017 and deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in fourth quarter 2018. In April 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution directing Entergy New Orleans to explore the options for accelerating the deployment of AMI. In June 2018 the City Council approved a one year acceleration of AMI in its service area for an incremental $4.4 million, bringing the total capital spending related to AMI for Entergy New Orleans to $79.4 million.


State and Local Rate Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –State and Local Rate Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. The following are updatesis an update to that discussion.


Retail Rates


Energy Smart Programs

As discussed inSee the Form 10-K in September 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a supplemental plan and proposed several options for an interim cost recovery mechanism necessary to recover program costs duringdiscussion of the period between when existing funds directed to Energy Smart programs were depleted and when new rates from the then-anticipated 2018 combined rate case (subsequently filed in July 2018), which will include a cost recovery mechanism for Energy Smart funding, take effect (estimated to be August 2019). In December 2017 the City Council approved an energy efficiency cost recovery rider as an interim funding mechanism for Energy Smart, subject to verification that no additional funding sources exist. In June 2018 the City Council also approved a resolution recommending that Entergy New Orleans allocate approximately $13.5 million of benefits resulting from the Tax Act to Energy Smart. Entergy New Orleans is seeking approval of a permanent and stable source of funding for Energy Smart as part of its base rate case filed in July 2018 and revised in September 2018.

Base Rate Case
In July 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed its 2018 base rate case with the City Council, but withdrew it in August 2018. In September 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed a revised electric and gas base rate case with the City Council. The revised filing requests a 10.5% return on equity for electric operations with opportunity to earn a 10.75% return on equity through a performance adder provision of the electric formula rate plan, and requests a 10.75% return on equity for gas operations. The proposed electric rates in the revised filing reflect a net reduction of $20.3 million. The reduction in electric rates includes a base rate increase of $135.2 million, of which $131.5 million is associated with moving costs currently collected through fuel and riders into base rates, plus a request for an advanced metering

160

Table of Contents
filed by Entergy New Orleans LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

surcharge to recover $7.1 million associated with advanced metering infrastructure, offset by a net decrease of $31.1 million related to projected fuel and energy efficiency riders.in September 2018. The filing also includes a proposed gas rate decrease of $142 thousand. Entergy New Orleans’s rates reflect the inclusion of federal income tax reductions due to the Tax Act and the provisions of a previously-approved agreement in principle determining how the benefits of the Tax Act would flow.  Entergy New Orleans included cost of service studies for electric and gas operations for the twelve months ending December 31, 2017 and the projected twelve months ending December 31, 2018.  In addition, Entergy New Orleans included capital additions expected to be placed into service for the period through December 31, 2019.  Entergy New Orleans’s request for a change in rates is based on the projected twelve months ending December 31, 2018. 

The filing’s major provisions include: (1) a new electric rate structure, which realigns the revenue requirement associated with capacity and long-term service agreement expense from certain existing riders to base revenue, provides for the recovery of the cost of advanced metering infrastructure, and partially blends rates for Entergy New Orleans’s customers residing in Algiers with customers residing in the remainder of Orleans Parish through a three-year phase-in; (2) contemporaneous cost recovery riders for investments in energy efficiency/demand response, incremental changes in capacity/long-term service agreement costs, grid modernization investment, and gas infrastructure replacement investment; and (3) formula rate plans for both electric and gas operations. The procedural schedule calls for an evidentiary hearing to bein this proceeding was held in June 2019. The record and post-hearing briefs were submitted in July 2019. In August 2019, Entergy New Orleans sent a letter to the City Council proposing a framework for settlement of the rate case.  That framework includes, among other things: (1) a total reduction in revenues of approximately $30 million ($27 million electric, $3 million gas); (2) a reduced return on common equity lower than 10.5%, but still commensurate with Entergy New Orleans’s level of risk, paired with three-year electric and gas formula rate plans with forward-looking features; (3) a demand-side management program intended to achieve greater penetration of the City Council’s Energy Smart programs and make progress towards the City Council’s energy efficiency goals. In October 2019 the City Council’s Utility Committee approved a resolution for consideration by the full City Council that included a 9.35% return on common equity, a total reduction in revenues of approximately $39 million ($36 million electric; $3 million gas), and an equity ratio of the lesser of 50% or Entergy New Orleans’s actual equity ratio. Also in October 2019, Entergy New Orleans sent another letter to the City Council identifying certain issues with the proposed resolution and inviting the City Council to resume negotiations in an effort to address these issues. The City Council may consider the resolution at its November 7, 2019 meeting.


Reliability Investigation


In August 2017 the City Council established a docket to investigate the reliability of the Entergy New Orleans distribution system and to consider implementing certain reliability standards and possible financial penalties for not meeting any such standards. In April 2018 the City Council adopted a resolution directing Entergy New Orleans to demonstrate that it has been prudent in the management and maintenance of the reliability of its distribution system. The resolution also called for Entergy New Orleans to file a revised reliability plan addressing the current state of its distribution system and proposing remedial measures for increasing reliability. In June 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed its response to the City Council’s resolution regarding the prudence of its management and maintenance of the reliability of its distribution system.  In July 2018, Entergy New Orleans filed its revised reliability plan discussing the various reliability programs that it uses to improve distribution system reliability and discussing generally the positive effect that advanced meter deployment and grid modernization can have on future reliability.  Entergy New Orleans has retained a national consulting firm with expertise in distribution system reliability to conduct a review of Entergy New Orleans’s distribution system reliability-related practices and procedures and to provide recommendations for improving distribution system reliability. The report was filed with the City Council in October 2018. The City Council also approved a resolution that opens a prudence investigation into whether Entergy New Orleans was imprudent for not acting sooner to address outages in New Orleans and whether fines should be imposed. In January 2019, Entergy New Orleans filed testimony in response to the prudence investigation and asserting that it had been prudent in managing

Federal Regulation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 

Nuclear Matters

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.



161166

Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Critical Accounting Estimatessystem reliability. In April 2019 the City Council advisors filed comments and testimony asserting that Entergy New Orleans did not act prudently in maintaining and improving its distribution system reliability in recent years and recommending that a financial penalty in the range of $1.5 million to $2 million should be assessed.  Entergy New Orleans disagrees with the recommendation and submitted rebuttal testimony and rebuttal comments in June 2019. In October 2019 the City Council’s Utility Committee passed a resolution recommending that the City Council fines Entergy New Orleans $1 million for alleged imprudence in the maintenance of its distribution system. The City Council is expected to consider the resolution at its November 7, 2019 meeting.


Renewable Portfolio Standard Rulemaking

In March 2019 the City Council initiated a rulemaking proceeding to consider whether to establish a renewable portfolio standard. The rulemaking will consider, among other issues, whether to adopt a renewable portfolio standard, whether such standard should be voluntary or mandatory, what kinds of technologies should qualify for inclusion in the rules, what level, if any, of renewable generation should be required, and whether penalties are an appropriate component of the proposed rules. Parties to the proceeding submitted initial comments in June 2019 and reply comments in July 2019. Entergy New Orleans recommends that the City Council adopt a voluntary clean energy standard of 70% of generation being clean energy by 2030, as so defined, which, in addition to renewable generation, would include nuclear, beneficial electrification, and demand-side management as compliant technologies. Several other industry leaders, academic researchers, and environmental advocates filed comments also supporting a clean energy standard. Other parties, including many representatives of the solar and wind industry, are recommending mandatory, renewables-only requirements of up to 100% renewable resources by 2040. In September 2019 the City Council advisors issued a report and recommendations, which also put forth three alternative rules for comment from the parties. Comments were submitted in October 2019 with replies to be filed in November 2019.

Federal Regulation

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 

Nuclear Matters

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$184,164
 
$182,451
 
$499,584
 
$482,251
 
$176,738
 
$184,164
 
$464,773
 
$499,584
Natural gas 16,018
 16,566
 67,319
 61,977
 17,466
 16,018
 68,418
 67,319
TOTAL 200,182
 199,017
 566,903
 544,228
 194,204
 200,182
 533,191
 566,903
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 54,754
 26,082
 93,859
 79,118
 27,013
 54,754
 84,963
 93,859
Purchased power 57,828
 79,137
 214,773
 220,601
 68,091
 57,828
 195,721
 214,773
Other operation and maintenance 30,593
 26,092
 87,312
 73,462
 32,755
 30,593
 95,305
 87,312
Taxes other than income taxes 15,551
 15,135
 43,534
 41,397
 15,142
 15,551
 41,819
 43,534
Depreciation and amortization 14,059
 13,286
 41,756
 39,356
 14,756
 14,059
 43,146
 41,756
Other regulatory charges - net 5,853
 5,514
 18,313
 6,717
 7,571
 5,853
 9,716
 18,313
TOTAL 178,638
 165,246
 499,547
 460,651
 165,328
 178,638
 470,670
 499,547
                
OPERATING INCOME 21,544
 33,771
 67,356
 83,577
 28,876
 21,544
 62,521
 67,356
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 1,694
 654
 3,762
 1,656
 2,793
 1,694
 7,769
 3,762
Interest and investment income 30
 222
 330
 521
 109
 30
 352
 330
Miscellaneous - net (660) (317) (2,401) (617) (1,019) (660) (3,467) (2,401)
TOTAL 1,064
 559
 1,691
 1,560
 1,883
 1,064
 4,654
 1,691
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 5,388
 5,313
 15,936
 16,012
 6,046
 5,388
 18,001
 15,936
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (626) (229) (1,390) (580) (1,115) (626) (3,102) (1,390)
TOTAL 4,762
 5,084
 14,546
 15,432
 4,931
 4,762
 14,899
 14,546
                
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 17,846
 29,246
 54,501
 69,705
 25,828
 17,846
 52,276
 54,501
                
Income taxes (3,561) 10,717
 3,943
 25,316
 920
 (3,561) 5,342
 3,943
                
NET INCOME 21,407
 18,529
 50,558
 44,389
 
$24,908
 
$21,407
 
$46,934
 
$50,558
                
Preferred dividend requirements and other 
 241
 
 724
        
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY 
$21,407
 
$18,288
 
$50,558
 
$43,665
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.                



(Page left blank intentionally)



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income 
$50,558
 
$44,389
 
$46,934
 
$50,558
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization 41,756
 39,356
 43,146
 41,756
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 25,605
 30,834
 20,427
 25,605
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Receivables (15,310) (17,030) (14,741) (15,310)
Fuel inventory 495
 (490) (374) 495
Accounts payable 8,868
 (4,950) (11,654) 8,868
Prepaid taxes (8,743) (4,484)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued 242
 (8,743)
Interest accrued 564
 546
 14
 564
Deferred fuel costs (59) 4,258
 8,328
 (59)
Other working capital accounts (5,062) (6,750) (8,737) (5,062)
Provisions for estimated losses 417
 (1,702) 1,423
 417
Other regulatory assets 19,068
 10,093
 (14,435) 19,068
Other regulatory liabilities (5,353) (1,131) (15,371) (5,353)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (12,956) (13,793) (5,784) (12,956)
Other assets and liabilities 479
 5,094
 28,015
 479
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 100,327
 84,240
 77,433
 100,327
        
INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Construction expenditures (142,585) (81,143) (162,177) (142,585)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 3,762
 1,656
 7,769
 3,762
Changes in money pool receivable - net 10,607
 (32,067) 22,016
 10,607
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account 3
 
 
 3
Payments to storm reserve escrow account (905) (406) (1,382) (905)
Changes in securitization account (4,115) (2,990) (3,043) (4,115)
Change in other investments 
 (1,754)
Net cash flow used in investing activities (133,233) (116,704) (136,817) (133,233)
        
FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 59,590
 
 
 59,590
Retirement of long-term debt (5,342) (5,114) (5,420) (5,342)
Distributions/dividends paid:    
Change in money pool payable - net 46,318
 
Distributions paid:    
Common equity (23,750) (36,100) 
 (23,750)
Preferred stock 
 (724)
Other 2,587
 216
 (1,165) 2,587
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities 33,085
 (41,722)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities 39,733
 33,085
        
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 179
 (74,186) (19,651) 179
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 32,741
 103,068
 19,677
 32,741
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$32,920
 
$28,882
 
$26
 
$32,920
        
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid during the period for:    
Cash paid (received) during the period for:    
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$14,584
 
$14,668
 
$17,211
 
$14,584
Income taxes 
($4,899) 
$—
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents        
Cash 
$26
 
$30
 
$26
 
$26
Temporary cash investments 32,894
 32,711
 
 19,651
Total cash and cash equivalents 32,920
 32,741
 26
 19,677
Securitization recovery trust account 5,570
 1,455
 5,268
 2,224
Accounts receivable:    
    
Customer 61,107
 51,006
 57,173
 43,890
Allowance for doubtful accounts (3,135) (3,057) (3,116) (3,222)
Associated companies 17,464
 22,976
 2,541
 27,938
Other 5,986
 6,471
 4,954
 4,090
Accrued unbilled revenues 21,315
 20,638
 22,776
 18,907
Total accounts receivable 102,737
 98,034
 84,328
 91,603
Fuel inventory - at average cost 1,395
 1,890
 1,907
 1,533
Materials and supplies - at average cost 12,944
 10,381
 12,865
 12,133
Prepaid taxes 35,222
 26,479
Prepayments and other 11,160
 8,030
 10,655
 6,905
TOTAL 201,948
 179,010
 115,049
 134,075
        
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS        
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 1,016
 1,016
 1,016
 1,016
Storm reserve escrow account 80,448
 79,546
 82,236
 80,853
Other 
 2,373
TOTAL 81,464
 82,935
 83,252
 81,869
        
UTILITY PLANT        
Electric 1,334,227
 1,302,235
 1,430,352
 1,364,091
Natural gas 279,689
 261,263
 302,801
 284,728
Construction work in progress 139,839
 46,993
 196,842
 146,668
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 1,753,755
 1,610,491
 1,929,995
 1,795,487
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 659,315
 631,178
 699,525
 670,135
UTILITY PLANT - NET 1,094,440
 979,313
 1,230,470
 1,125,352
        
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS        
Regulatory assets:        
Deferred fuel costs 4,080
 4,080
 4,080
 4,080
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $62,857 as of September 30, 2018 and $72,095 as of December 31, 2017) 232,365
 251,433
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $52,085 as of September 30, 2019 and $60,453 as of December 31, 2018) 244,231
 229,796
Other 1,471
 1,065
 1,749
 1,416
TOTAL 237,916
 256,578
 250,060
 235,292
        
TOTAL ASSETS 
$1,615,768
 
$1,497,836
 
$1,678,831
 
$1,576,588
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Payable due to associated company 
$2,077
 
$2,077
 
$1,979
 
$1,979
Accounts payable:        
Associated companies 35,094
 47,472
 85,485
 43,416
Other 67,197
 29,777
 37,394
 36,686
Customer deposits 28,617
 28,442
 28,515
 28,667
Taxes accrued 4,310
 4,068
Interest accrued 6,051
 5,487
 6,380
 6,366
Deferred fuel costs 7,715
 7,774
 9,616
 1,288
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 26,200
 
 15,439
 25,301
Other 7,459
 7,351
 7,182
 9,521
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 180,410
 128,380
 196,300
 157,292
        
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 310,767
 283,302
 349,600
 323,595
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 2,242
 2,323
 2,153
 2,219
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 78,164
 119,259
 52,705
 60,249
Asset retirement cost liabilities 3,236
 3,076
 3,463
 3,291
Accumulated provisions 85,500
 85,083
 88,017
 86,594
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 7,774
 20,755
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $69,259 as of September 30, 2018 and $74,419 as of December 31, 2017) 473,147
 418,447
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $58,382 as of September 30, 2019 and $63,620 as of December 31, 2018) 462,273
 467,358
Long-term payable due to associated company 16,346
 16,346
 14,367
 14,367
Other 15,826
 5,317
 18,069
 16,673
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 993,002
 953,908
 990,647
 974,346
        
Commitments and Contingencies        
        
EQUITY        
Member's equity 442,356
 415,548
 491,884
 444,950
TOTAL 442,356
 415,548
 491,884
 444,950
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$1,615,768
 
$1,497,836
 
$1,678,831
 
$1,576,588
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 and 20172018
(Unaudited)
  
  
 Member’s Equity
 (In Thousands)
  
Balance at December 31, 20162017

$426,946415,548

  
Net income44,38910,882

Common equity distributions(36,1006,250)
Preferred stock dividendsBalance at March 31, 2018(724420,180)
  
Net income18,269
Common equity distributions(8,250)
Balance at June 30, 2018430,199
Net income21,407
Common equity distributions(9,250)
Balance at September 30, 20172018

$434,511442,356

  
  
Balance at December 31, 20172018

$415,548444,950

  
Net income50,5589,023

Common equity distributionsBalance at March 31, 2019(23,750453,973)
  
Net income13,003
Balance at June 30, 2019466,976
Net income24,908
Balance at September 30, 20182019

$442,356491,884

  
See Notes to Financial Statements. 




ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIESSELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
            
 Three Months Ended Increase/   Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$86
 
$82
 
$4
 5
 
$82
 
$86
 
($4) (5)
Commercial 62
 63
 (1) (2) 56
 62
 (6) (10)
Industrial 10
 9
 1
 11
 9
 10
 (1) (10)
Governmental 20
 21
 (1) (5) 19
 20
 (1) (5)
Total billed retail 178
 175
 3
 2
 166
 178
 (12) (7)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 5
 3
 2
 67
 7
 5
 2
 40
Other 1
 4
 (3) (75) 4
 1
 3
 300
Total 
$184
 
$182
 
$2
 1
 
$177
 
$184
 
($7) (4)
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential 779
 711
 68
 10
 793
 779
 14
 2
Commercial 660
 634
 26
 4
 645
 660
 (15) (2)
Industrial 128
 119
 9
 8
 124
 128
 (4) (3)
Governmental 225
 217
 8
 4
 228
 225
 3
 1
Total retail 1,792
 1,681
 111
 7
 1,790
 1,792
 (2) 
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 281
 255
 26
 10
 364
 281
 83
 30
Total 2,073
 1,936
 137
 7
 2,154
 2,073
 81
 4
                
                
 Nine Months Ended Increase/  
 Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)  
 (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:    
  
  
    
  
  
Residential 
$209
 
$191
 
$18
 9
 
$192
 
$209
 
($17) (8)
Commercial 171
 173
 (2) (1) 156
 171
 (15) (9)
Industrial 26
 26
 
 
 24
 26
 (2) (8)
Governmental 57
 58
 (1) (2) 54
 57
 (3) (5)
Total billed retail 463
 448
 15
 3
 426
 463
 (37) (8)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non associated companies 24
 21
 3
 14
Non-associated companies 26
 24
 2
 8
Other 12
 13
 (1) (8) 13
 12
 1
 8
Total 
$499
 
$482
 
$17
 4
 
$465
 
$499
 
($34) (7)
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential 1,846
 1,635
 211
 13
 1,821
 1,846
 (25) (1)
Commercial 1,711
 1,690
 21
 1
 1,686
 1,711
 (25) (1)
Industrial 338
 322
 16
 5
 326
 338
 (12) (4)
Governmental 591
 589
 2
 
 607
 591
 16
 3
Total retail 4,486
 4,236
 250
 6
 4,440
 4,486
 (46) (1)
Sales for resale:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non-associated companies 1,218
 1,270
 (52) (4) 1,353
 1,218
 135
 11
Total 5,704
 5,506
 198
 4
 5,793
 5,704
 89
 2
                
                

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


Net Income


Third Quarter2018 2019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net income increased $26.3$7.4 million primarily due to higher net revenueretail electric price, higher volume/weather, and a lower effectivehigher other income, tax rate, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net income increased $42.4$19.5 million primarily due to higher net revenueretail electric price, higher volume/weather, higher other income, lower interest expense, and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.


Net RevenueOperating Revenues


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the third quarter 20182019 to the third quarter 2017:

2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$477.2
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(29.0
$181.5)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers
(30.9
)
Volume/weather13.68.6
Purchased power capacity10.9

Retail electric price3.317.0

Other2019 operating revenues1.6
2018 net revenue

$210.9442.9


Entergy Texas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a rider effective October 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in operating revenues is offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 420 GWh, or 8%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial salesindustrial demand charges and an increase in commercialusage during the unbilled sales period.

174

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and industrial usage. The increase in commercial usage is primarily due to the effects of the power outages caused by Hurricane Harvey, which decreased sales volume in 2017. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the chemicalsSubsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and wood products industries and an increase in demand from mid-size to small customers.Analysis


The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased purchased power capacity costs under Entergy Texas’s purchased power agreements with Entergy Louisiana.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to ana base rate increase in the distribution cost recovery factor rider rate in September 2017,effective October 2018 as approved by the PUCT. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the distribution cost recovery factor riderrate case filing.

170

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenueoperating revenues comparing the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

2018:
 Amount
 (In Millions)
20172018 operating revenues
$1,229.7
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net revenueincome
(52.1
$474.8)
Return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers
(73.5
)
Volume/weather30.69.3

Retail electric price10.433.5

Purchased power capacity2019 operating revenues9.5
Other0.4
2018 net revenue

$525.71,146.9



Entergy Texas’s results include revenues from rate mechanisms designed to recover fuel, purchased power, and other costs such that the revenues and expenses associated with these items generally offset and do not affect net income. “Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income” includes the revenue variance associated with these items.

The return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers resulted from the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes through a rider effective October 2018. There is no effect on net income as the reduction in operating revenues is offset by a reduction in income tax expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 944 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricity usage includingduring the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercialunbilled sales and an increase in commercial and industrial usage. The increase in commercial usage is primarily due to the effects of the power outages caused by Hurricane Harvey, which decreased sales volume in 2017. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in demand from mid-size to small customers and new customers in the chemicals and wood products industries.period.


The retail electric price variance is primarily due to increases in the transmission cost recovery factor ridera base rate in March 2017 and the distribution cost recovery factor rider rate in September 2017, eachincrease effective October 2018 as approved by the PUCT. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the transmission cost recovery factor rider and the distribution cost recovery factor rider filings.rate case filing.

The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased purchased power capacity costs under Entergy Texas’s purchased power agreements with Entergy Louisiana.


Other Income Statement Variances


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter 20172018


Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:


a loss on the sale of assets in 2019 of $0.2 million as compared to a gain on the sale of assets of $2.1 million in 2018;
an increase of $2.7 million in energy efficiency costs primarily due to the timing of recovery from customers;
an increase of $1.5$1.7 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overalla higher scope of work performed during plant outages in the third quarter 20182019 as compared to the same period2018;
an increase of $1.6 million in 2017;costs related to customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $1.4 million in vegetation maintenance costs;
an increase of $1.3 million in customer service costs primarily due to higher contract costs and write-offs of customer accounts;
an increase of $1 million in information technology costs primarily due to higher software maintenance costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and higher contract costs;upgrades and maintenance; and
an increase of $1 million in distribution operations costs primarily due to the timing of work performed and an overall higher scope of work performed in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.

The increase was partially offset by a gain on the sale of assets in 2018 of $2.1 million.    



171175

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


an increase of $1.2 million in distribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily as a result of new depreciation rates established in the settlement of the 2018 base rate case and additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2019, including the Montgomery County Power Station project.

Interest expense decreased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2019, including the Montgomery County Power Station project.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 20182019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172018


Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:


an increase of $3.8$4.7 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overalla higher scope of work performed during plant outages in 20182019 as compared to the same period in 2017;2018;
an increase of $4.0 million in costs related to customer initiatives to explore new technologies and services and continuous customer improvement;
an increase of $3.2 million in energy efficiency costs primarily due to the timing of recovery from customers;
an increase of $3.1 million in distribution operations costs primarily due to the timing of work performed and an overall higher scope of work performed in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017; and
an increase of $1.9 million in customer serviceinformation technology costs primarily due to higher costs related to improved infrastructure, enhanced security, and upgrades and maintenance;
an increase of $3.2 million in distribution operations and asset management costs primarily due to higher advanced metering customer education costs and higher contract costs for meter reading services; and write-offs
a loss on the sale of customer accounts.

The increase was partially offset byassets in 2019 of $0.3 million as compared to a gain on the sale of assets in 2018 of $2.1 million.    million in 2018.


Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due toas a result of new depreciation rates established in the settlement of the 2018 base rate case and additions to plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2019, including the Montgomery County Power Station project.

Interest expense decreased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2019, including the Montgomery County Power Station project.

Income Taxes


The effective income tax rates were (22.6%) for the third quarter 2019 and (48.1%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% were primarily due to the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects and regulatory activity regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The effective income tax rate was 20.4% for the third quarter 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.



176

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The effective income tax rate was 21.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the federal statutory rate of 21% was primarily due to athe write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset in 2018 and the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

The effective income tax rate was 35.9% for the third quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

The effective income tax rate was 34.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and a write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset.


Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017. Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responsesthat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$56
 
$115,513
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities174,881
 197,677
Investing activities(603,077) (233,850)
Financing activities520,418
 (58,843)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents92,222
 (95,016)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$92,278
 
$20,497

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by Entergy and Entergy’s regulatorsoperating activities decreased $22.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the Tax Act.nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes to customers. The decrease was partially offset by:



the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
the timing of collection of receivables from customers; and
a decrease of $8.1 million in pension contributions in 2019. See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.


172177

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$115,513
 
$6,181
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities197,677
 192,954
Investing activities(233,850) (228,582)
Financing activities(58,843) 30,949
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(95,016) (4,679)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$20,497
 
$1,502

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to increased net income, partially offset by the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and the timing of collection of receivables from customers.


Investing Activities


Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $5.3$369.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 primarily due to to:

an increase of $48.8$197.5 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on the Montgomery County Power Station. TheStation;
an increase was partially offset by of $100.9 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2019 as compared to 2018; and
money pool activity.


DecreasesIncreases in Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool are a sourceuse of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool decreasedincreased by $8.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to decreasing $43.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to decreasing by $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


Financing Activities


Entergy Texas’s financing activities usedprovided $520.4 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to using $58.8 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to providing $30.9primarily due to:

the issuance of $300 million of cash for 4.0% Series mortgage bonds and $400 million of 4.5% Series mortgage bonds in January 2019;
the nine months endedissuance of $300 million of 3.55% Series mortgage bonds in September 30, 2017 primarily due to2019;
a capital contribution of $87.5 million received from Entergy Corporation in August 2019 in anticipation of upcoming construction expenditures, including Montgomery County Power Station; and
the issuance of $35 million aggregate liquidation value 5.375% Series A preferred stock in September 2019.

The increase was partially offset by the repayment, at maturity, of $500 million of 7.125% Series mortgage bonds in February 2019 and money pool activity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt. See Note 3 to the financial statements herein for more details on the issuance of preferred stock.


IncreasesDecreases in Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool are a sourceuse of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool increaseddecreased by $89.3$22.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2019.



173

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Capital Structure


Entergy Texas’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The decreaseincrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Texas is primarily due to the net issuance of $500 million of mortgage bonds in 2019, partially offset by an increase in retained earnings.
equity.
September 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017September 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018
Debt to capital52.6% 55.7%53.7% 51.6%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds(5.4%) (6.3%)(3.0%) (5.2%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)47.2% 49.4%50.7% 46.4%
Effect of subtracting cash(0.4%) (2.5%)(1.4%) %
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)46.8% 46.9%49.3% 46.4%


(a)Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.



178

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of financing lease obligations and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Texas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Texas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy Texas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Texas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Texas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to information provided in the Form 10-K.


Entergy Texas is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $1.9$1.8 billion in capital investments during that period.  The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments such as the Montgomery County Power Station; transmission projects to enhance reliability, reduce congestion, and enable economic growth; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers, including advanced meters and related investments; system improvements; software and security; and other investments. Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements, environmental compliance, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, business restructuring, changes in project plans, and the ability to access capital.


Entergy Texas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:


September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
(In Thousands)
$1,217 $44,903 ($89,312) $681
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
(In Thousands)
$8,299 ($22,389) $1,217 $44,903


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.


Entergy Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in September 2023.2024.  The credit facility includes fronting commitments for the issuance of letters of credit against $30 million of the borrowing

174

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2018,2019, there were no cash borrowings and $1.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility.  In addition, Entergy Texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of September 30, 2018,2019, a $20$26.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Texas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.


State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.


Fuel and purchased power cost recoveryPurchased Power Cost Recovery

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2015 certain parties filed briefs in an open PUCT proceeding asserting that Entergy Texas should refund to retail customers an additional $10.9 million in bandwidth remedy payments Entergy Texas received related to calendar year 2006 production costs.  In October 2015 an ALJ issued a proposal for decision recommending that the additional bandwidth remedy payments be refunded to retail customers. In January 2016 the PUCT issued its order affirming the ALJ’s recommendation, and Entergy Texas filed a motion for rehearing of the PUCT’s decision, which the PUCT denied. In March 2016, Entergy Texas filed a complaint in Federal District Court for the Western District of Texas and a petition in the Travis County (State) District Court appealing the PUCT’s decision. The pending appeals did not stay the PUCT’s decision, and Entergy Texas refunded to customers the $10.9 million over a four-month period beginning with the first billing cycle of July 2016. The federal appeal of the PUCT’s January 2016 decision was heard in December 2016, and the Federal District Court granted Entergy Texas’s requested relief. In January 2017, the PUCT and an intervenor filed petitions for appeal of the Federal District Court ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral argument was held before the Fifth Circuit in February 2018. In April 2018 the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision of the Federal District Court, reinstating the original PUCT decision. In October 2018, Entergy Texas filed a notice of nonsuit of its claims in the State District Court’s appeal of the PUCT’s January 2016 decision.


In December 2017,September 2019, Entergy Texas filed an application for ato reconcile its fuel refund of approximately $30.5 million for the months of May 2017 through October 2017. For most customers, the refunds flowed through bills beginning January 2018 and continued through March 2018. The fuel refund was approved by the PUCT in March 2018.

2018 Base Rate Case

In May 2018, Entergy Texas filed a base rate case with the PUCT seeking an increase in base rates and rider rates of approximately $166 million, of which $48 million is associated with movingpurchased power costs currently being collected through riders into base rates such that the total incremental revenue requirement increase is approximately $118 million. Entergy Texas’s proposed rates and revenues reflect the inclusion of federal income tax reductions due to the Tax Act as well as a rider designed to return unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes over a period of two years following PUCT approval. The base rate case is based on a 12-month test year ending December 31, 2017. In addition, Entergy Texas included capital additions placed into service for the period offrom April 1, 20132016 through December 31, 2017, as well as a post-test year adjustment to include capital additions placed in service by June 30, 2018. In October 2018March 2019. During the parties filed an unopposed settlement resolving all issues in the proceeding, supporting testimony, a proposed order approving the settlement, and a motion for interim rates effective for usage on and after October 17, 2018. The unopposed settlement reflects the following terms: a base rate increase of $53.2 million (net of costs realigned from riders), a $25 million refund to reflect the lower federal income tax rate applicable toreconciliation period, Entergy Texas from January 25, 2018 through the date new rates are implemented, $6 million of capitalized skylining tree hazard costs will not be recovered from customers, $242.5 million of protected excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which includes a tax gross-up, will be returned to customers through base rates under the average rate assumption method over the lives of the associated assets, and $185.2 million of unprotected excess accumulated deferred incomeincurred approximately


175179

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


taxes,$1.6 billion in Texas jurisdictional eligible fuel and purchased power expenses, net of certain revenues credited to such expenses and other adjustments. Entergy Texas estimated an under-recovery balance of approximately $25.8 million, including interest, which includesEntergy Texas requested authority to carry over as the beginning balance for the subsequent reconciliation period beginning April 2019. The proceeding is currently pending.

Base Rate Case

In January 2019, Entergy Texas filed for recovery of rate case expenses totaling $7.2 million. The amounts requested primarily include internal and external expenses related to litigating the 2018 base rate case. Parties filed testimony in April 2019 recommending a tax gross-up, will be returneddisallowance ranging from $3.2 million to customers through$4.2 million of the $7.2 million requested. In May 2019, Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony responding to the parties’ positions. In September 2019 an order was issued abating the procedural schedule and scheduled hearing to allow the finalization of a settlement in principle reached among the parties. The settlement provides for a black box disallowance of $1.4 million. In the third quarter 2019, Entergy Texas recorded a provision for the 2018 base rate case expenses based on the settlement in principle. In October 2019 the settlement was filed for review by the PUCT.
Distribution Cost Recovery Factor (DCRF) Rider

In March 2019, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to set a new DCRF rider. The unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxesproposed new DCRF rider will include carrying chargesis designed to collect approximately $3.2 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in distribution between January 1, 2018 and will be in effect over a period of 12 months for large industrial customers and over a period of four years for other customers. The settlement, if approved byDecember 31, 2018. In September 2019 the PUCT issued an order approving rates, which had been effective on an interim basis since June 2019, at the level proposed in Entergy Texas’s application.

Transmission Cost Recovery Factor (TCRF) Rider

In December 2018, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to set a new TCRF rider. The proposed new TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $2.7 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in transmission between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2018. In April 2019 parties filed testimony proposing a load growth adjustment, which would provide final resolutionhave fully offset Entergy Texas’s proposed TCRF revenue requirement. In July 2019 the PUCT granted Entergy Texas’s application as filed to begin recovery of all issuesthe requested $2.7 million annual revenue requirement, rejecting opposing parties’ proposed adjustment; however, the PUCT found that the question of prudence of the actual investment costs should be determined in Entergy Texas’s next rate case similar to the procedure used for the costs recovered through the DCRF rider. In October 2019 the PUCT issued an order on a motion for rehearing, clarifying and affirming its prior order granting Entergy Texas’s application as filed. Also in October 2019 a second motion for rehearing was filed, and Entergy Texas filed a response in opposition to the motion. The second motion for rehearing is pending before the PUCT.

In August 2019, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to amend its TCRF rider. The proposed new TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $19.4 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers based on its capital invested in transmission between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019, which is $16.7 million in incremental annual revenue above the $2.7 million approved in the matter, including those related to the Tax Act. In October 2018 the ALJ granted the unopposed motion for interim rates to be effective for service rendered on or after October 17, 2018.prior pending TCRF proceeding. The unopposed settlementproceeding is pending consideration by the PUCT.currently pending.

Federal Regulation


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Federal Regulationin the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation. 



180

Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Industrial and Commercial Customers


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Industrial and Commercial Customers” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for discussion of nuclear matters.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$477,231
 
$432,909
 
$1,229,657
 
$1,175,324
 
$442,877
 
$477,231
 
$1,146,931
 
$1,229,657
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 79,130
 60,292
 154,925
 164,447
 64,211
 79,130
 129,285
 154,925
Purchased power 153,673
 163,532
 463,933
 474,241
 151,965
 153,673
 463,966
 463,933
Other operation and maintenance 58,795
 51,874
 171,317
 162,594
 69,937
 58,795
 190,989
 171,317
Taxes other than income taxes 20,752
 20,811
 61,461
 59,506
 20,870
 20,752
 60,773
 61,461
Depreciation and amortization 31,365
 29,788
 93,272
 87,272
 38,722
 31,365
 113,071
 93,272
Other regulatory charges - net 33,550
 27,619
 85,064
 61,879
 27,662
 33,550
 66,574
 85,064
TOTAL 377,265
 353,916
 1,029,972
 1,009,939
 373,367
 377,265
 1,024,658
 1,029,972
                
OPERATING INCOME 99,966
 78,993
 199,685
 165,385
 69,510
 99,966
 122,273
 199,685
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,222
 1,849
 5,716
 4,762
 7,454
 2,222
 18,948
 5,716
Interest and investment income 601
 244
 1,698
 656
 486
 601
 2,542
 1,698
Miscellaneous - net 468
 1,255
 (154) 679
 115
 468
 980
 (154)
TOTAL 3,291
 3,348
 7,260
 6,097
 8,055
 3,291
 22,470
 7,260
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 21,760
 21,714
 65,646
 64,949
 21,379
 21,760
 63,992
 65,646
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1,253) (1,134) (3,224) (2,896) (3,534) (1,253) (9,370) (3,224)
TOTAL 20,507
 20,580
 62,422
 62,053
 17,845
 20,507
 54,622
 62,422
                
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 82,750
 61,761
 144,523
 109,429
 59,720
 82,750
 90,121
 144,523
                
Income taxes 16,904
 22,173
 30,538
 37,886
 (13,504) 16,904
 (43,381) 30,538
                
NET INCOME 
$65,846
 
$39,588
 
$113,985
 
$71,543
 73,224
 65,846
 133,502
 113,985
                
Preferred dividend requirements 110
 
 110
 
        
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK 
$73,114
 
$65,846
 
$133,392
 
$113,985
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.                









(Page left blank intentionally)



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income 
$113,985
 
$71,543
 
$133,502
 
$113,985
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization 93,272
 87,272
 113,071
 93,272
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 640
 36,252
 21,898
 640
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Receivables (40,287) (30,030) 21,578
 (40,287)
Fuel inventory 1,045
 (7,371) (1,476) 1,045
Accounts payable (12,864) 24,711
 (58,792) (12,864)
Taxes accrued 24,476
 1,122
 3,545
 24,476
Interest accrued (6,084) (7,207) (11,478) (6,084)
Deferred fuel costs (33,734) (3,134) (6,588) (33,734)
Other working capital accounts 891
 (8,455) (13,740) 891
Provisions for estimated losses 1,006
 (1,460) (3,470) 1,006
Other regulatory assets 64,311
 59,549
 63,793
 64,311
Other regulatory liabilities 15,313
 (1,500) (83,674) 15,313
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (20,999) (22,978) (7,209) (20,999)
Other assets and liabilities (3,294) (5,360) 3,921
 (3,294)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 197,677
 192,954
 174,881
 197,677
        
INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Construction expenditures (291,118) (243,226) (622,342) (291,118)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 5,820
 4,879
 19,029
 5,820
Proceeds from sale of assets 3,753
 
 
 3,753
Insurance proceeds received from property damages 
 2,431
Changes in money pool receivable - net 43,686
 681
 (8,299) 43,686
Changes in securitization account 4,009
 6,653
 8,535
 4,009
Net cash flow used in investing activities (233,850) (228,582) (603,077) (233,850)
        
FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 986,477
 
Retirement of long-term debt (60,500) (58,076) (563,246) (60,500)
Capital contribution from parent 87,500
 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock 33,486
 
Change in money pool payable - net 
 89,312
 (22,389) 
Other 1,657
 (287) (1,410) 1,657
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities (58,843) 30,949
 520,418
 (58,843)
        
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (95,016) (4,679)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 92,222
 (95,016)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 115,513
 6,181
 56
 115,513
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$20,497
 
$1,502
 
$92,278
 
$20,497
        
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid (received) during the period for:        
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$69,669
 
$70,237
 
$73,752
 
$69,669
Income taxes 
($624) 
($1,446) 
$2,292
 
($624)
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Cash 
$1,541
 
$32
 
$25
 
$26
Temporary cash investments 18,956
 115,481
 92,253
 30
Total cash and cash equivalents 20,497
 115,513
 92,278
 56
Securitization recovery trust account 33,675
 37,683
 31,649
 40,185
Accounts receivable:        
Customer 105,040
 74,382
 88,557
 69,714
Allowance for doubtful accounts (570) (463) (680) (461)
Associated companies 51,624
 90,629
 24,124
 64,441
Other 9,560
 9,831
 6,770
 12,275
Accrued unbilled revenues 56,008
 50,682
 65,207
 51,288
Total accounts receivable 221,662
 225,061
 183,978
 197,257
Fuel inventory - at average cost 41,686
 42,731
 44,143
 42,667
Materials and supplies - at average cost 40,083
 38,605
 43,774
 41,883
Prepayments and other 19,968
 19,710
 22,266
 15,903
TOTAL 377,571
 479,303
 418,088
 337,951
        
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS        
Investments in affiliates - at equity 458
 457
 413
 448
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) 376
 376
 376
 376
Other 18,999
 19,235
 19,863
 19,218
TOTAL 19,833
 20,068
 20,652
 20,042
        
UTILITY PLANT        
Electric 4,693,662
 4,569,295
 5,028,850
 4,773,984
Construction work in progress 223,279
 102,088
 663,465
 325,193
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 4,916,941
 4,671,383
 5,692,315
 5,099,177
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,650,889
 1,579,387
 1,745,046
 1,684,569
UTILITY PLANT - NET 3,266,052
 3,091,996
 3,947,269
 3,414,608
        
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS        
Regulatory assets:        
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $253,493 as of September 30, 2018 and $313,123 as of December 31, 2017) 597,087
 661,398
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $178,558 as of September 30, 2019 and $236,336 as of December 31, 2018) 534,255
 598,048
Other 32,118
 26,973
 32,861
 29,371
TOTAL 629,205
 688,371
 567,116
 627,419
        
TOTAL ASSETS 
$4,292,661
 
$4,279,738
 
$4,953,125
 
$4,400,020
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.  
  
  
  

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$500,000
 
$—
 
$—
 
$500,000
Accounts payable:        
Associated companies 42,825
 59,347
 45,090
 119,371
Other 106,968
 126,095
 169,788
 150,679
Customer deposits 41,875
 40,925
 40,304
 43,387
Taxes accrued 70,135
 45,659
 57,058
 53,513
Interest accrued 19,472
 25,556
 12,877
 24,355
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 35,213
 87,627
Deferred fuel costs 33,567
 67,301
 13,109
 19,697
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 91,126
 
Other 9,792
 8,132
 8,786
 6,353
TOTAL 915,760
 373,015
 382,225
 1,004,982
        
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 548,173
 544,642
 581,310
 552,535
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 11,403
 11,983
 10,713
 11,176
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 320,640
 412,620
 236,463
 264,623
Other regulatory liabilities 23,017
 6,850
 44,784
 47,884
Asset retirement cost liabilities 7,123
 6,835
 7,526
 7,222
Accumulated provisions 11,121
 10,115
 10,386
 13,856
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 
 17,853
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $298,038 as of September 30, 2018 and $358,104 as of December 31, 2017) 1,027,817
 1,587,150
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $220,625 as of September 30, 2019 and $283,659 as of December 31, 2018) 1,938,303
 1,013,735
Other 53,455
 48,508
 64,635
 61,605
TOTAL 2,002,749
 2,646,556
 2,894,120
 1,972,636
        
Commitments and Contingencies        
        
COMMON EQUITY    
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2018 and 2017 49,452
 49,452
EQUITY    
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2019 and 2018 49,452
 49,452
Paid-in capital 596,994
 596,994
 682,980
 596,994
Retained earnings 727,706
 613,721
 909,348
 775,956
Total common shareholder's equity 1,641,780
 1,422,402
Preferred stock without sinking fund 35,000
 
TOTAL 1,374,152
 1,260,167
 1,676,780
 1,422,402
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$4,292,661
 
$4,279,738
 
$4,953,125
 
$4,400,020
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
Common Equity    Common Equity  
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 TotalPreferred Stock 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
(In Thousands)  (In Thousands)
                
Balance at December 31, 2016
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$537,548
 
$1,068,994
       
Net income
 
 71,543
 71,543
       
Balance at September 30, 2017
$49,452
 
$481,994
 
$609,091
 
$1,140,537
       
       
Balance at December 31, 2017
$49,452
 
$596,994
 
$613,721
 
$1,260,167

$—
 
$49,452
 
$596,994
 
$613,721
 
$1,260,167
                
Net income
 
 113,985
 113,985

 
 
 17,350
 17,350
Balance at March 31, 2018
 49,452
 596,994
 631,071
 1,277,517
                
Net income
 
 
 30,789
 30,789
Balance at June 30, 2018
 49,452
 596,994
 661,860
 1,308,306
         
Net income
 
 
 65,846
 65,846
Balance at September 30, 2018
$49,452
 
$596,994
 
$727,706
 
$1,374,152

$—
 
$49,452
 
$596,994
 
$727,706
 
$1,374,152
                
         
Balance at December 31, 2018
$—
 
$49,452
 
$596,994
 
$775,956
 
$1,422,402
         
Net income
 
 
 21,342
 21,342
Balance at March 31, 2019
 49,452
 596,994
 797,298
 1,443,744
         
Net income
 
 
 38,936
 38,936
Balance at June 30, 2019
 49,452
 596,994
 836,234
 1,482,680
         
Net income
 
 
 73,224
 73,224
Capital contribution from parent
 
 87,500
 
 87,500
Preferred stock issuance35,000
 
 (1,514) 
 33,486
Preferred stock dividends
 
 
 (110) (110)
Balance at September 30, 2019
$35,000
 
$49,452
 
$682,980
 
$909,348
 
$1,676,780
         
See Notes to Financial Statements.                



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESSELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
            
 Three Months Ended Increase/   Three Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$224
 
$202
 
$22
 11
 
$216
 
$224
 
($8) (4)
Commercial 111
 101
 10
 10
 95
 111
 (16) (14)
Industrial 109
 97
 12
 12
 101
 109
 (8) (7)
Governmental 7
 6
 1
 17
 5
 7
 (2) (29)
Total billed retail 451
 406
 45
 11
 417
 451
 (34) (8)
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 18
 18
 
 
 14
 18
 (4) (22)
Non-associated companies 5
 4
 1
 25
 2
 5
 (3) (60)
Other 3
 5
 (2) (40) 10
 3
 7
 233
Total 
$477
 
$433
 
$44
 10
 
$443
 
$477
 
($34) (7)
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 2,003
 1,839
 164
 9
 1,994
 2,003
 (9) 
Commercial 1,392
 1,279
 113
 9
 1,365
 1,392
 (27) (2)
Industrial 2,156
 2,018
 138
 7
 2,219
 2,156
 63
 3
Governmental 78
 73
 5
 7
 69
 78
 (9) (12)
Total retail 5,629
 5,209
 420
 8
 5,647
 5,629
 18
 
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 446
 386
 60
 16
 372
 446
 (74) (17)
Non-associated companies 208
 238
 (30) (13) 148
 208
 (60) (29)
Total 6,283
 5,833
 450
 8
 6,167
 6,283
 (116) (2)
                
                
 Nine Months Ended Increase/   Nine Months Ended Increase/  
Description 2018 2017 (Decrease) %
 2019 2018 (Decrease) %
 (Dollars In Millions)   (Dollars In Millions)  
Electric Operating Revenues:                
Residential 
$523
 
$482
 
$41
 9
 
$510
 
$523
 
($13) (2)
Commercial 291
 282
 9
 3
 255
 291
 (36) (12)
Industrial 295
 292
 3
 1
 279
 295
 (16) (5)
Governmental 19
 18
 1
 6
 16
 19
 (3) (16)
Total billed retail 1,128
 1,074
 54
 5
 1,060
 1,128
 (68) (6)
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 46
 47
 (1) (2) 42
 46
 (4) (9)
Non-associated companies 26
 18
 8
 44
 6
 26
 (20) (77)
Other 30
 36
 (6) (17) 39
 30
 9
 30
Total 
$1,230
 
$1,175
 
$55
 5
 
$1,147
 
$1,230
 
($83) (7)
                
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):                
Residential 4,789
 4,326
 463
 11
 4,662
 4,789
 (127) (3)
Commercial 3,610
 3,387
 223
 7
 3,533
 3,610
 (77) (2)
Industrial 6,024
 5,781
 243
 4
 5,999
 6,024
 (25) 
Governmental 220
 205
 15
 7
 194
 220
 (26) (12)
Total retail 14,643
 13,699
 944
 7
 14,388
 14,643
 (255) (2)
Sales for resale:                
Associated companies 1,199
 1,149
 50
 4
 1,157
 1,199
 (42) (4)
Non-associated companies 725
 586
 139
 24
 300
 725
 (425) (59)
Total 16,567
 15,434
 1,133
 7
 15,845
 16,567
 (722) (4)

SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations


System Energy’s principal asset currently consists of an ownership interest and a leasehold interest in Grand Gulf.  The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans.  System Energy’s operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement.  Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy’s only source of operating revenues.


Third Quarter 20182019 Compared to Third Quarter2017 2018


Net income increased $2.4$2.1 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Net income increased $4.4 million primarily due to the increase in operating revenues resulting from changes in rate base as compared to the same period in the prior year and a lower effective income tax rate.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Net income increased $8.4 million primarily due to:

an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction resulting from spending on Grand Gulf outage projects in 2018;
the increase in operating revenues resulting from changes in rate base as compared to the same period in the prior year; and
a lower effective income tax rate.


Income Tax Legislation


See the “Income Tax Legislation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017. Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K contains additional discussion of the effect of the Tax Act on 20172018 results of operations and financial position, the provisions of the Tax Act, and the uncertainties associated with accounting for the Tax Act.Act, and Note 10 to the financial statements herein contains updates to that discussion. Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K contains a discussion of the regulatory proceedings commenced or other responses by Entergy and Entergy’s regulators tothat have considered the effects of the Tax Act.



184

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$95,685
 
$287,187
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities224,675
 131,556
Investing activities15,896
 (169,573)
Financing activities(171,931) 5,371
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents68,640
 (32,646)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$164,325
 
$254,541


188

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


LiquidityOperating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased by $93.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to a decrease in spending of $47.9 million on nuclear refueling outages in 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018 and Capital Resourcesthe return of the unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes in 2018.


Cash FlowInvesting Activities


Cash flowsSystem Energy’s investing activities provided $15.9 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to using $169.6 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$287,187
 
$245,863
    
Cash flow provided by (used in):   
Operating activities131,556
 279,485
Investing activities(169,573) (259,598)
Financing activities5,371
 (120,783)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(32,646) (100,896)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$254,541
 
$144,967

Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased by $147.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to an increase in spending of $49 million on nuclear refueling outages in 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 and the return of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes.following activity:

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $90 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to:

money pool activity;
changes in the decommissioning trust fund including portfolio rebalancing of the Grand Gulf decommissioning trust fund in the third quarter 2018; and
$9.1 million in funds held on deposit in 2017 for interest payments which were due October 1, 2017.

The decrease was partially offset by:


an increase of $133.6$121.8 million as a result of fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
an increasea decrease of $112.4$75.5 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily as a result of a higher scope of work performed during thespending in 2018 on Grand Gulf outage in 2018.projects.


Decreases in Financing Activities

System Energy’s receivable from the money pool are a sourcefinancing activities used $171.9 million of cash flow and System Energy’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $95.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to increasing by $202.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


185

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Financing Activities

System Energy’s financing activities providedproviding $5.4 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to using $120.8 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to the following activity:


the issuance in March 2018 of $100 million of 3.42% Series J notes by the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity;
the payment in February 2017, at maturity,an increase of $50 million of the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s 4.02% Series H notes;
a decrease of $21.1$46 million in common stock dividends and distributions in 2019. Common stock dividends and distributions were lower in 2018 in orderanticipation of the excess accumulated deferred income taxes being returned to maintaincustomers as a result of the targeted capital structure;Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;
an increase of $48 million in net repayments of long-term borrowings in 2019 on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility; and
net repayments of short-term borrowings of $17.8 million in 2018 on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2018 comparedfacility.

In March 2019, System Energy issued $134 million of 2.50% Series 2019 revenue refunding bonds due April 2022. The proceeds were used to net short-term borrowingsredeem, prior to maturity, $134 million of $14.9 million on the nuclear fuel variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2017.

5.875% Series 1998 pollution control revenue refunding bonds due April 2022. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.


Capital Structure


System Energy’s debt to capital ratio is shown in the following table. The increasedecrease in the debt to capital ratio for System Energy is primarily due to the issuancea decrease in March 2018 of $100 million of 3.42% Series J notes by the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity.retained earnings.
September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
September 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018
Debt to capital47.2% 44.5%44.9% 46.1%
Effect of subtracting cash(12.2%) (16.0%)(8.2%) (4.0%)
Net debt to net capital35.0% 28.5%36.7% 42.1%



189

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  System Energy uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition.  System Energy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition because net debt indicates System Energy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.


Uses and Sources of Capital


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.


System Energy is developing its capital investment plan for 20192020 through 20212022 and currently anticipates making $405$435 million in capital investments during that period. The preliminary estimate includes amounts associated with specific investments and initiatives such as investments in Grand Gulf.


186

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


System Energy’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
 September 30, 2017 
December 31,
2016
(In Thousands)
$16,365 $111,667 $236,467 $33,809
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
September 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
(In Thousands)
$14,775 $107,122 $16,365 $111,667


See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.


The System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $120 million scheduled to expire in September 2021. As of September 30, 2018, $37.72019, $53.6 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issuedloans were outstanding under the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility.


Capital Funds Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of the Capital Funds Agreement, Entergy Corporation had agreed to supply System Energy with sufficient capital to (i) maintain System Energy’s equity capital at an amount equal to a minimum of 35% of its total capitalization (excluding short-term debt), (ii) permit the continued commercial operation of Grand Gulf, and (iii) pay in full when due all indebtedness for borrowed money of System Energy. Effective July 19, 2019, the Capital Funds Agreement was terminated.

Federal Regulation


See the “Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation - Federal Regulation” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.


Complaints Against System Energy

Return on Equity Complaints

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2017 the APSC and MPSC filed a complaint with the FERC against System Energy. The complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equity under the Unit Power Sales Agreement is 10.94%, which was established in a rate proceeding that became final in July 2001.

The APSC and MPSC complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requests the FERC to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests that the FERC establish January 23, 2017 as a refund effective date. The complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for System Energy is between 8.37% and 8.67%. System Energy answered the complaint in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. The LPSC and the City Council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. In September 2017 the FERC established a refund effective date of January 23, 2017, consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in Unit Power Sales Agreement below, and directed the parties to engage in settlement proceedings before an ALJ. The parties have been unable to settle the return on equity issue and a FERC hearing judge was assigned in July 2018. The 15-month refund effective date in connection with the APSC/MPSC complaint expired on April 23, 2018.

In April 2018 the LPSC filed a complaint with the FERC against System Energy seeking an additional fifteen-month refund period.  The LPSC complaint requests similar relief from the FERC with respect to System Energy’s return on equity and also requests the FERC to investigate System Energy’s capital structure.  The APSC, MPSC, and City Council intervened in the proceeding, filed an answer expressing support for the complaint, and asked the FERC to consolidate this proceeding with the proceeding initiated by the complaint of the APSC and MPSC in January 2017.


187190

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Complaints Against System Energy answered

Return on Equity and Capital Structure Complaints

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the return on equity complaints filed by the APSC and the MPSC and by the LPSC against System Energy. The LPSC’s complaint in May 2018 and also filedincludes a motionchallenge to dismiss the complaint. In July 2018 the LPSC answered System Energy’s motion to dismiss.

capital structure. In August 2018 the FERC issued an order dismissing the LPSC’s request to investigate System Energy’s capital structure and setting for hearing System Energy’sthe return on equity complaint, with a refund effective date of April 2018. The portion of the LPSC’s complaint dealing with return on equity was subsequently consolidated with the APSC and MPSC complaint for hearing. The consolidated hearing was scheduled for June 2019, but the procedural schedule is currently being held in abeyance. An ALJ ordered the abeyance after the FERC,parties are required to address an order (issued in a separate proceeding on the return on equity forinvolving New England transmission owners, issued an orderowners) that proposed modifying itsthe FERC’s standard methodology for determining return on equity. In September 2018, System Energy filed a request for rehearing and the LPSC filed a request for rehearing or reconsideration of the FERC’s August 2018 order. The LPSC’s request referenced an amended complaint that it filed on the same day raising the same capital structure claim the FERC had earlier dismissed. The FERC docketedinitiated a new proceeding for the amended capital structure complaint, in a new proceeding, and System Energy submitted a response in October 2018. In January 2019 the FERC set the amended capital structure complaint for settlement and hearing proceedings. Settlement procedures in the capital structure proceeding commenced in February 2019. As noted below, in June 2019 settlement discussions were terminated and the amended capital structure complaint was consolidated with the ongoing return on equity proceeding.

In January 2019 the LPSC and the APSC and MPSC filed direct testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the refund period January 23, 2017 through April 23, 2018, the LPSC argues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.81% and the APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.24%. For the refund period April 27, 2018 through July 27, 2019, and for application on a prospective basis, the LPSC argues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.97% and the APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.41%. In March 2019, System Energy submitted answering testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, System Energy’s testimony argues for a return on equity of 10.10% (median) or 10.70% (midpoint). For the second refund period, System Energy’s testimony shows that the calculated returns on equity for the first period fall within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity, and thus the second complaint should be dismissed (and the first period return on equity used going forward). If the FERC nonetheless were to set a new return on equity for the second period (and going forward), System Energy argues the return on equity should be either 10.32% (median) or 10.69% (midpoint).

In May 2019 the FERC trial staff filed its direct and answering testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, the FERC trial staff calculates an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 9.89% based on the application of FERC’s proposed methodology. The FERC trial staff’s direct and answering testimony noted that an authorized return on equity of 9.89% for the first refund period was within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity for the second refund period, as calculated using a study period ending January 31, 2019 for the second refund period.

In June 2019, System Entergy filed testimony responding to the testimony filed by the FERC trial staff. Among other things, System Energy’s testimony rebutted arguments raised by the FERC trial staff and provided updated calculations for the second refund period based on the study period ending May 31, 2019. For that refund period, System Energy’s testimony shows that strict application of the return on equity methodology proposed by the FERC trial staff indicates that the second complaint would not be dismissed, and the new return on equity would be set at 9.65% (median) or 9.74% (midpoint). System Energy’s testimony argues that these results are insufficient in light of benchmarks such as state returns on equity and treasury bond yields, and instead proposes that the calculated returns on equity for the second period should be either 9.91% (median) or 10.3% (midpoint). System Energy’s testimony also argues that, under application of its proposed modified methodology, the 10.10% return on equity calculated for the first refund period would fall within the range of presumptively just and reasonable returns on equity for the second refund period. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding.


191

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Also in June 2019, the FERC’s Chief ALJ issued an order terminating settlement discussions in the amended complaint addressing System Energy’s capital structure. The ALJ consolidated the amended complaint with the ongoing return on equity proceeding and set new procedural deadlines for the consolidated hearing, such that the hearing will commence in January 2020 and the initial decision will be due in June 2020.

In August 2019 the LPSC and the APSC and MPSC filed rebuttal testimony in the return on equity proceeding and direct and answering testimony relating to System Energy’s capital structure. The LPSC reargues for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 7.81% for the first refund period and 7.97% for the second refund period. The APSC and MPSC argue for an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 8.26% for the first refund period and 8.32% for the second refund period. With respect to capital structure, the LPSC proposes that the FERC establish a hypothetical capital structure for SERI for ratemaking purposes. Specifically, the LPSC proposes that System Energy’s common equity ratio be set to Entergy Corporation’s equity ratio of 37% equity and 63% debt. In the alternative, the LPSC argues that the equity ratio should be no higher than 49%, the composite equity ratio of System Energy and the other Entergy operating companies who purchase under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The APSC and MPSC recommended that 35.98% be set as the common equity ratio for System Energy. As an alternative, the APSC and MPSC proposed that System Energy’s common equity be set based on the median equity ratio of the proxy group for setting the return on equity. The median equity ratio of the proxy group proposed by the APSC and MPSC is 46.75%.

In September 2019 the FERC trial staff filed its rebuttal testimony in the return on equity proceeding. For the first refund period, the FERC trial staff calculates an authorized return on equity for System Energy of 9.40% based on the application of the FERC’s proposed methodology and an updated proxy group. For the second refund period, based on the study period ending May 31, 2019, the FERC trial staff rebuttal testimony argues for a return on equity of 9.63%. In September 2019 the FERC trial staff also filed direct and answering testimony relating to System Energy’s capital structure. The FERC trial staff argues that the average capital structure of the proxy group used to develop System Energy’s return on equity should be used to establish the capital structure. Using this approach, the FERC trial staff calculates the average capital structure for its proposed proxy group of 46.74% common equity, and 53.26% debt.
In October 2018.2019, System Energy filed answering testimony disputing the FERC trial staff’s, the LPSC’s, and the APSC’s and MPSC’s arguments for the use of a hypothetical capital structure and arguing that the use of System Energy’s actual capital structure is just and reasonable.


Grand Gulf Sale-leaseback Renewal Complaint


InAs discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2018 the LPSC filed a complaint against System Energy and Entergy Services related to System Energy’s renewal in 2015 of a sale-leaseback transaction originally entered into in December 1988 for an 11.5% undivided interest in Grand Gulf Unit 1. The complaint alleges

In February 2019 the presiding ALJ ruled that System Energy violated the filed rate andhearing ordered by the FERC’s ratemaking and accounting requirements when itFERC includes the issue of whether specific subcategories of accumulated deferred income tax should be included in, Unit Power Sales Agreement billingsor excluded from, System Energy’s formula rate. In March 2019 the LPSC, MPSC, APSC, and City Council filed direct testimony. The LPSC testimony seeks refunds that include the renewal lease payments (approximately $17.2 million per year since July 2015), rate base reductions for accumulated deferred income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions (claimed to be approximately $334.5 million as of December 2018), and the cost of capital additions associated with the sale-leaseback interest (claimed to be approximately $274.8 million), as well as interest on those amounts. The direct testimony of the City Council and thatthe APSC and MPSC address various issues raised by the LPSC. System Energy is double-recovering costs by including bothdisputes that any refunds are owed for billings under the lease payments and the capital additions in Unit Power Sales Agreement billings. The complaint also claims thatAgreement. A hearing has been scheduled for November 2019.

In June 2019 System Energy was imprudentfiled answering testimony in entering into the sale-leaseback renewal because the Utility operating companies that purchase Grand Gulf’s output from System Energy could have obtained cheaper capacity and energy in the MISO markets. The complaint further alleges that System Energy violated various other reporting and accounting requirements and should have sought prior FERC approval of the lease renewal. The complaint seeks various forms of relief from the FERC. The complaint seeks refunds for capital addition costs for all years in which they were recorded in allegedly non-formula accounts or, alternatively, the disallowance of the return on equity for the capital additions in those years plus interest. The complaint also asksproceeding arguing that the FERC disallow and refundshould reject all claims for refunds.  Among other things, System Energy argued that claims for refunds of the lease costs of the sale-leasebacklease renewal on grounds of imprudence, investigate System Energy’s treatment of a DOE litigation payment,payments and impose certain forward-looking procedural protections, including audit rights for retail regulators ofcapital additions should be rejected because those costs were recovered consistent with the Unit Power Sales Agreement formula rates.

In June 2018,rate, System Energy was not over or double recovering any costs, and Entergy Services filed a motion to dismisscustomers will save approximately $850 million over initial and answer to the LPSC complaint denying that System Energy’s treatment of the sale-leaseback renewal and capital additions violated the terms of the filed rate or any other FERC ratemaking, accounting, or legal requirements or otherwise constituted double recovery. The response also argued that the complaint is inconsistent with a FERC-approved settlement to which the LPSC is a party and that explicitly authorizesleases.  System Energy to recover its lease payments. Finally, the response argued that both the capital additions and the sale-leaseback renewal were prudent investments and the LPSC complaint fails to justify any disallowance or refunds. The response asked that the FERC dismiss and reject the LPSC complaint without further action, investigation, or hearing, but also offered to submit formula rate protocols for the Unit Power Sales Agreement similar to the procedures used for reviewing transmission rates under the MISO tariff. In September 2018 the FERC issued an order setting the complaint for hearing and settlement proceedings. The FERC established a refund effective date of May 2018.

Unit Power Sales Agreement

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in August 2017, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula. The proposed amendments would


188192

Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


result in lower chargesargued that claims for refunds associated with liabilities arising from uncertain tax positions should be rejected because the liabilities do not provide cost-free capital, the repayment timing of the liabilities is uncertain, and the outcome of the underlying tax positions is uncertain.  System Energy’s testimony also challenged the refund calculations supplied by the other parties.

In August 2019 the FERC trial staff filed direct and answering testimony seeking refunds for rate base reductions for liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions (claimed to the Utility operating companiesbe up to approximately $602 million plus interest). The FERC trial staff also argued that buy capacity and energy from System Energy recovered $32 million more in depreciation expense for capital additions than it should have. In September 2019, System Energy filed cross-answering testimony disputing the FERC trial staff’s arguments for refunds, stating that the FERC trial staff’s position regarding depreciation rates for capital additions is not unreasonable and explaining that any change in depreciation expense is only one element of a Unit Power Sales Agreement rebilling calculation. Adjustments to depreciation expense in any rebilling under the Unit Power Sales Agreement.Agreement formula rate will also involve changes to accumulated depreciation, accumulated deferred income taxes, and other formula elements as needed. In June 2018, System EnergyOctober 2019 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony increasing the amount of refunds sought for liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions.  The LPSC now seeks approximately $512 million plus interest.  At the same time, the FERC an uncontested settlement relatingtrial staff filed rebuttal testimony conceding that it was no longer seeking up to $602 million related to the updateduncertain tax positions; instead, it is seeking approximately $511 million plus interest.  The LPSC also argued that adjustments to depreciation rates and nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements. In August 2018 the FERC issued an order accepting the settlement. In third quarter 2018, System Energy recordedshould affect rate base on a reduction in depreciation expense of approximately $26 million, representing the cumulative difference in depreciation expense resulting from the depreciation rates used from October 11, 2017 through September 30, 2018 and the depreciation rates included in the settlement filing accepted by the FERC.prospective basis only.


Nuclear Matters


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Nuclear Matters” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The following is an update to that discussion.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016 the NRC placed Grand Gulf in the “regulatory response column,” or Column 2, of its Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. In August 2018 the NRC moved Grand Gulf into the “licensee response column,” or Column 1, of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review Grand Gulf’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in Column 2. Based on performance indicator data for the third quarter 2018, Entergy expects that the NRC will announce that Grand Gulf has moved back to Column 2. In August 2018 operators safely performed a reduction in power to address an operational issue with a plant system. As a result of the power reduction, the threshold for one of the NRC’s performance indicators was exceeded, which results in a Column 2 designation under the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix at least until new performance indicator data is reported in the first quarter 2019.


Environmental Risks


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –Environmental Risks” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.


Critical Accounting Estimates


See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.


New Accounting Pronouncements


See “New Accounting Pronouncements” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and AnalysisNote 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2019 2018 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES                
Electric 
$78,965
 
$156,106
 
$339,864
 
$475,849
 
$145,472
 
$78,965
 
$424,585
 
$339,864
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operation and Maintenance:                
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale 14,484
 16,170
 44,939
 53,164
 23,748
 14,484
 66,335
 44,939
Nuclear refueling outage expenses 5,906
 4,435
 12,698
 13,595
 8,412
 5,906
 25,013
 12,698
Other operation and maintenance 48,969
 49,871
 143,003
 149,325
 49,533
 48,969
 147,283
 143,003
Decommissioning 8,626
 8,290
 25,624
 34,974
 8,976
 8,626
 26,663
 25,624
Taxes other than income taxes 7,106
 6,679
 21,069
 19,767
 7,120
 7,106
 21,835
 21,069
Depreciation and amortization 4,355
 34,524
 71,143
 105,152
 26,613
 4,355
 79,761
 71,143
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net 7,398
 (2,843) (15,080) (24,626) (8,016) 7,398
 (27,059) (15,080)
TOTAL 96,844
 117,126
 303,396
 351,351
 116,386
 96,844
 339,831
 303,396
                
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (17,879) 38,980
 36,468
 124,498
 29,086
 (17,879) 84,754
 36,468
                
OTHER INCOME                
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,028
 1,736
 7,032
 4,148
 2,251
 2,028
 5,518
 7,032
Interest and investment income 23,738
 6,624
 33,567
 15,021
 8,215
 23,738
 21,577
 33,567
Miscellaneous - net (1,421) (1,651) (4,391) (5,139) (1,300) (1,421) (4,018) (4,391)
TOTAL 24,345
 6,709
 36,208
 14,030
 9,166
 24,345
 23,077
 36,208
                
INTEREST EXPENSE                
Interest expense 9,753
 9,169
 28,734
 27,469
 8,546
 9,753
 26,467
 28,734
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (515) (425) (1,783) (1,014) (551) (515) (1,350) (1,783)
TOTAL 9,238
 8,744
 26,951
 26,455
 7,995
 9,238
 25,117
 26,951
                
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES (2,772) 36,945
 45,725
 112,073
 30,257
 (2,772) 82,714
 45,725
                
Income taxes (25,744) 16,362
 (22,942) 51,793
 5,226
 (25,744) 9,633
 (22,942)
                
NET INCOME 
$22,972
 
$20,583
 
$68,667
 
$60,280
 
$25,031
 
$22,972
 
$73,081
 
$68,667
                
See Notes to Financial Statements.                






SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income $68,667
 
$60,280
 
$73,081
 
$68,667
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization 133,877
 184,625
 163,069
 133,877
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued 14,159
 44,017
 (2,426) 14,159
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Receivables 20,806
 21,147
 (7,456) 20,806
Accounts payable 22,637
 2,344
 2,935
 22,637
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued (1,017) 2,956
 14,579
 (1,017)
Interest accrued 2,311
 401
 (1,478) 2,311
Other working capital accounts (52,524) 7,605
 3,411
 (52,524)
Other regulatory assets (4,773) 1,196
 (9,121) (4,773)
Other regulatory liabilities (36,119) 53,519
 90,118
 (36,119)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (11,629) (14,665) (5,013) (11,629)
Other assets and liabilities (24,839) (83,940) (97,024) (24,839)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities 131,556
 279,485
 224,675
 131,556
        
INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Construction expenditures (166,458) (60,041) (92,228) (166,458)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 7,032
 4,148
 5,518
 7,032
Nuclear fuel purchases (110,485) (24,239) (2,046) (110,485)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel 12,867
 60,188
 26,272
 12,867
Changes in other investments - net 
 (9,061)
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales 357,209
 308,134
 348,606
 357,209
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds (365,040) (336,069) (362,573) (365,040)
Changes in money pool receivable - net 95,302
 (202,658) 92,347
 95,302
Net cash flow used in investing activities (169,573) (259,598)
Net cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities 15,896
 (169,573)
        
FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 211,985
 
 1,007,775
 211,985
Retirement of long-term debt (124,304) (50,003) (1,069,206) (124,304)
Changes in short-term borrowings - net (17,830) 14,858
 
 (17,830)
Common stock dividends and distributions (64,480) (85,610) (110,500) (64,480)
Other 
 (28)
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities 5,371
 (120,783) (171,931) 5,371
        
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (32,646) (100,896)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 68,640
 (32,646)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 287,187
 245,863
 95,685
 287,187
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$254,541
 
$144,967
 
$164,325
 
$254,541
        
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest - net of amount capitalized 
$10,308
 
$26,251
 
$21,052
 
$10,308
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.BALANCE SHEETSASSETS
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Cash 
$153
 
$78
 
$79
 
$68
Temporary cash investments 254,388
 287,109
 164,246
 95,617
Total cash and cash equivalents 254,541
 287,187
 164,325
 95,685
Accounts receivable:        
Associated companies 55,727
 170,149
 62,740
 148,571
Other 4,840
 6,526
 6,330
 5,390
Total accounts receivable 60,567
 176,675
 69,070
 153,961
Materials and supplies - at average cost 93,074
 88,424
 111,927
 97,225
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs 53,174
 7,908
 20,253
 44,424
Prepaid taxes 
 5,415
Prepayments and other 5,099
 2,489
 9,040
 2,985
TOTAL 466,455
 562,683
 374,615
 399,695
        
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS        
Decommissioning trust funds 952,413
 905,686
 1,002,261
 869,543
TOTAL 952,413
 905,686
 1,002,261
 869,543
        
UTILITY PLANT        
Electric 4,434,393
 4,327,849
 5,036,030
 5,036,116
Property under capital lease 588,281
 588,281
Construction work in progress 71,482
 69,937
 141,858
 70,156
Nuclear fuel 259,450
 207,513
 158,745
 234,889
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT 5,353,606
 5,193,580
 5,336,633
 5,341,161
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,191,434
 3,175,018
 3,273,504
 3,212,080
UTILITY PLANT - NET 2,162,172
 2,018,562
 2,063,129
 2,129,081
        
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS        
Regulatory assets:        
Other regulatory assets 449,100
 444,327
 455,492
 446,371
Other 4,835
 7,629
 3,759
 4,124
TOTAL 453,935
 451,956
 459,251
 450,495
        
TOTAL ASSETS 
$4,034,975
 
$3,938,887
 
$3,899,256
 
$3,848,814
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        

SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.BALANCE SHEETSLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
 2018 2017 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Currently maturing long-term debt 
$85,006
 
$85,004
 
$10
 
$6
Short-term borrowings 
 17,830
Accounts payable:        
Associated companies 38,522
 16,878
 11,475
 11,031
Other 62,015
 62,868
 61,391
 47,565
Taxes accrued 45,567
 46,584
 9,164
 
Interest accrued 15,700
 13,389
 11,817
 13,295
Current portion of unprotected excess accumulated deferred income taxes 36,946
 
 
 4,426
Other 2,436
 2,434
 2,829
 2,832
TOTAL 286,192
 244,987
 96,686
 79,155
        
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued 795,150
 776,420
 811,875
 805,296
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits 38,447
 39,406
 37,714
 38,673
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net 161,126
 246,122
 144,639
 158,998
Other regulatory liabilities 467,922
 455,991
 490,790
 381,887
Decommissioning 887,288
 861,664
 922,663
 896,000
Pension and other postretirement liabilities 110,245
 121,874
 93,626
 98,639
Long-term debt 554,449
 466,484
 569,991
 630,744
Other 19,160
 15,130
 31,493
 22,224
TOTAL 3,033,787
 2,983,091
 3,102,791
 3,032,461
        
Commitments and Contingencies        
        
COMMON EQUITY        
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2018 and 2017 601,850
 658,350
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2019 and 2018 601,850
 601,850
Retained earnings 113,146
 52,459
 97,929
 135,348
TOTAL 714,996
 710,809
 699,779
 737,198
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
$4,034,975
 
$3,938,887
 
$3,899,256
 
$3,848,814
        
See Notes to Financial Statements.        



SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
(Unaudited)
      
Common Equity  Common Equity  
Common
Stock
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
Common
Stock
 
Retained
Earnings
 Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
          
Balance at December 31, 2016
$679,350
 
$59,473
 
$738,823
     
Net income
 60,280
 60,280
Common stock dividends
 (85,610) (85,610)
     
Balance at September 30, 2017
$679,350
 
$34,143
 
$713,493
     
     
Balance at December 31, 2017
$658,350
 
$52,459
 
$710,809

$658,350
 
$52,459
 
$710,809
          
Net income
 68,667
 68,667

 22,308
 22,308
Common stock dividends and distributions(56,500) (7,980) (64,480)(56,500) (6,740) (63,240)
Balance at March 31, 2018601,850
 68,027
 669,877
          
Net income
 23,387
 23,387
Balance at June 30, 2018601,850
 91,414
 693,264
     
Net income
 22,972
 22,972
Common stock dividends and distributions
 (1,240) (1,240)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$601,850
 
$113,146
 
$714,996

$601,850
 
$113,146
 
$714,996
          
     
Balance at December 31, 2018
$601,850
 
$135,348
 
$737,198
     
Net income
 23,578
 23,578
Common stock dividends
 (45,500) (45,500)
Balance at March 31, 2019601,850
 113,426
 715,276
     
Net income
 24,472
 24,472
Common stock dividends
 (42,500) (42,500)
Balance at June 30, 2019601,850
 95,398
 697,248
     
Net income
 25,031
 25,031
Common stock dividends
 (22,500) (22,500)
Balance at September 30, 2019
$601,850
 
$97,929
 
$699,779
     
See Notes to Financial Statements.          





ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.  Legal Proceedings


See “PART I, Item 1,Litigation” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory proceedings affecting Entergy.  Also see NoteNotes 1 and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and “Item 5, Other Information,Environmental Regulation” below for updates regarding environmental proceedings and regulation.


Item 1A.  Risk Factors


There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in “PART I, Item 1A,Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K.


Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Period 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
 
Average Price Paid
per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
 
Maximum $
Amount
of Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under a Plan (b)
         
7/01/2018-7/2019-7/31/20182019 

 

$—

 

 

$350,052,918

8/01/2018-8/2019-8/31/20182019 

 

$—

 

 

$350,052,918

9/01/2018-9/2019-9/30/20182019 

 

$—

 

 

$350,052,918

Total 

 

$—

 

  


In accordance with Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy’s common stock.  According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market.  Entergy’s management has been authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans.  In addition to this authority, the Board has authorized share repurchase programs to enable opportunistic purchases in response to market conditions. In October 2010 the Board granted authority for a $500 million share repurchase program. The amount of share repurchases under these programs may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending or new investment opportunities.  In addition, in the first quarter 2018,2019, Entergy withheld 71,22976,735 shares of its common stock at $76.83$86.03 per share, 43,69882,550 shares of its common stock at $78.29$86.51 per share, and 16,69138,326 shares of its common stock at $78.51$87.10 per share, 932 shares of its common stock at $89.19 per share, and 2,280 shares of its common stock at $93.25 per share to pay income taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock granted and payout of performance units as part of its long-term incentive program.


(a)See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.
(b)Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $500 million plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.



Item 5.  Other Information

Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry


Following are updatesis an update to the Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.


Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982


Spent Nuclear Fuel

See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding Spent Nuclear Fuel. Following is an update to that discussion.

In September 2018 the DOE submitted an offer of judgment to resolve claims in the second round Entergy Nuclear Generation Company case involving Pilgrim in the amount of $62 million. The offer was accepted by Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in that amount in favor of Entergy Nuclear Generation Company. Entergy received payment from the U.S. Treasury in October 2018.

Management cannot predict the timing or amount of any potential recoveries on other claims filed by Entergy subsidiaries, and cannot predict the timing of any eventual receipt from the DOE of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims damage awards.

Nuclear Plant Decommissioning

See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding decommissioning funding for the nuclear plants.  Following is an update to that discussion.  


In March 20182019 filings with the NRC were made reporting on decommissioning funding for certainall of Entergy subsidiaries’ nuclear plants reporting on decommissioning funding.plants.  Those reports showed that decommissioning funding for each of thosethe nuclear plants met the NRC’s financial assurance requirements.

NRC Reactor Oversight Process

See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process and the status of each of Entergy’s nuclear plants. In June 2018 the NRC moved ANO 1 and ANO 2 into the “licensee response column,” or Column 1, of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review ANO 1’s and ANO 2’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column,” or Column 4. In August 2018 the NRC moved Grand Gulf into Column 1 of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. This action followed NRC inspections to review Grand Gulf’s performance in addressing issues that had previously resulted in classification in the “regulatory response column,” or Column 2. Based on performance indicator data for the third quarter 2018, Entergy expects that the NRC will announce that Grand Gulf has moved back to Column 2. In August 2018 operators safely performed a reduction in power to address an operational issue with a plant system. As a result of the power reduction, the threshold for one of the NRC’s performance indicators was exceeded, which results in a Column 2 designation under the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix at least until new performance indicator data is reported in the first quarter 2019.


Environmental Regulation


Following are updates to the Environmental Regulation section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.



Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments


Ozone NonattainmentPotential Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial Developments


As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy continues to support national legislation that would increase planning certainty for electric utilities while addressing carbon dioxide emissions in a responsible and flexible manner. Entergy voluntarily conducted a climate scenario analysis and published a comprehensive report in March 2019. The report follows the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area was originally classified as “moderate” nonattainment under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard with an attainment date of June 15, 2010.  In April 2015 the EPA revoked the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS),framework and in May 2016 the EPA issued a proposed rule approving a substitute for the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area. This redesignation indicates that the area has attained the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions and that it will maintain that NAAQS for 10 years from the daterecommendations of the approval. Final approval, which was effective in December 2016,Task Force on Climate-related Disclosures, describing climate-related governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets. Scenario analysis resulted in Entergy developing and publishing a new goal of reducing the area no longer being subject to any remaining anti-backsliding or nonattainment new source review requirements associated with the revoked 1997 NAAQS. In February 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opined that the EPA violated the CleanUtility’s emission rate by 50 percent from 2000 levels by 2030.

Cross-State Air Act by revoking the 1997 standard and by creating the process that allowed states to avoid certain anti-backsliding provisions of the Act. Opponents filed a legal challenge to the December 2016 redesignation based on the February 2018 D.C. Circuit decision.Pollution


As discussed in the Form 10-K, in March 2008 the EPA revised the NAAQS for ozone, creating the potential for additional counties and parishes in which Entergy operates to be placed in nonattainment status.  In April 2012 the EPA released its final nonattainment designations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.  In Entergy’s utility service area, the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Texas; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and Memphis, Tennessee/Mississippi/Arkansas areas were designated as in “marginal” nonattainment. In August 2015 and January 2016, the EPA proposed determinations that the Baton Rouge and Memphis areas had attained the 2008 standard. In May 2016 the EPA finalized those determinations and extended the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area’s attainment date for the 2008 ozone standard to July 20, 2016 and reclassified the Baton Rouge area as attainment for ozone under the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. In December 2016 the EPA determined that the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area had failed to attain the 2008 ozone standard by the 2016 attainment date. This finding reclassified the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area from marginal to “moderate” and set the attainment deadline as July 20, 2018. In May 2018 the EPA published a proposed rule approving the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria attainment demonstration for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. Final EPA action remains pending.

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2015 the EPA issued a final rule lowering the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to a level of 70 parts per billion. States were required to assess their attainment status and recommend designations to the EPA. In January 2018 the EPA proposed that the following counties and parishes in Entergy’s service territory be listed as in nonattainment: in Louisiana, Ascension Parish, East Baton Rouge Parish, West Baton Rouge Parish, Iberville Parish, and Livingston Parish; in Texas, Montgomery County. In addition to Lewis Creek in Montgomery County, Texas, Entergy owns or operates fossil-fueled generating units in East Baton Rouge Parish (Louisiana Station) and in Iberville Parish (Willow Glen), Louisiana. In May 2018 the EPA issued its final designations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The following parishes/counties initially were proposed as nonattainment, but designated as attainment in the final rule: in Louisiana, Ascension Parish, East Baton Rouge Parish, West Baton Rouge Parish, Iberville Parish, and Livingston Parish; in Texas, Liberty County and Waller Counties within the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area. The final designations were effective in August 2018. Entergy will continue to work with state environmental agencies on appropriate methods for assessing attainment and nonattainment with the new standard and, where necessary, in planning for compliance. Following designations by the EPA, states will be required to develop plans intended to return nonattainment areas to a condition of attainment. The timing for that action depends largely on the severity of nonattainment in a given area.

Regional Haze

In September 2016 the EPA published the final Arkansas Regional Haze federal implementation plan (FIP). In most respects, the EPA finalized its original proposal but shortened the time for compliance for installation of the NOx controls. The FIP required an emission limitation consistent with SO2 scrubbers at both White Bluff and Independence by October 2021 and NOx controls by April 2018. The EPA declined to adopt Entergy’s proposals related to ceasing coal use as an alternative to SO2 scrubbers for White Bluff SO2 Best Available Retrofit Control Technology.

In November 2016, Entergy and other interested parties, including the State of Arkansas, filed petitions for administrative reconsideration and stay at the EPA as well as petitions for judicial review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Eighth Circuit continues to review its prior grant of the government’s motion to hold the appeal litigation in abeyance pending settlement discussions and pending the State’s development of a state implementation plan (SIP) that, if approved by the EPA, would replace the FIP. The state has proposed its replacement SIP in two parts: Part I considers NOx requirements, and Part II considers SO2 requirements. The EPA approved the Part I NOx SIP in January 2018. The Part I SIP requires that Entergy address NOx impacts on visibility via compliance with the Cross State Air Pollution Rule ozone-season emission trading program.Update Rule to address interstate transport for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Starting in 2017 the final rule requires reductions in summer nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. Several states, including Arkansas has finalizedand Texas, filed a Part II SIP which is under review bychallenge to the Update Rule. In September 2019 the D.C. Circuit upheld the EPA’s underlying approach to the Update Rule but determined that it was inconsistent with the Clean Air Act because it failed to include deadlines consistent with downwind states’ deadlines for attainment. The court remanded the rule to the EPA and is currentlyfor further consideration but did not vacate, so the rule remains in effect pending a state administrative appeal. The final Part II SIP requires that Entergy achieve SO2 emission reductions via the use of low-sulfur coal at both White Bluff and Independence within three years. The Part II SIP also requires that Entergy cease to use coal at White Bluff by December 31, 2028 and notesEPA’s further review. Several petitions for reconsideration are still pending with the current planning assumption that Entergy’s Independence units will cease to burn coal by December 31, 2030.EPA, including one concerning whether the emissions budget for Mississippi should be increased.


New and Existing Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions


As discusseda part of a climate plan announced in June 2013, the EPA was directed to (i) reissue proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants by September 20, 2013, with finalization of the rules to occur in a timely manner; (ii) issue proposed carbon pollution standards, regulations, or guidelines, as appropriate, for modified, reconstructed, and existing power plants no later than June 1, 2014; (iii) finalize those rules by no later than June 1, 2015; and (iv) include in the Form 10-K,guidelines addressing existing power plants a requirement that states submit to the EPA the implementation plans required under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations by no later than June 30, 2016. In January 2014 the EPA issued the proposed New Source Performance Standards rule for new sources. In June 2014 the EPA issued proposed standards for existing power plants.  Entergy was actively engaged in the rulemaking process and submitted comments to the EPA in December 2014. The EPA issued the final rules for both new and existing sources in August 2015, and they were published in the Federal Register in October

2015. The existing source rule, also called the Clean Power Plan, required states to develop plans for compliance with the EPA’s emission standards. In February 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay halting the effectiveness of the rule pending review by the D.C. Circuit and, if applicable, by the U.S. Supreme Court. In March 2017 the current administration issued an executive order entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth” instructing the EPA to review and then to suspend, revise, or rescind the Clean Power Plan, if appropriate. The EPA subsequently asked the D.C. Circuit to hold the challenges to the Clean Power Plan and the greenhouse gas new source performance standards in abeyance and signed a notice of withdrawal of the proposed federal plan, model trading rules, and the Clean Energy Incentive Program. The court placed the litigation in abeyance in April 2017. The EPA Administrator also sent a letter to the affected governors explaining that states are not currently required to meet Clean Power Plan deadlines, some of which have passed. In October 2017 the EPA proposed a new rule that would repeal the Clean Power Plan on the grounds that it exceeds the EPA’s statutory authority under the Clean Air Act. In December 2017 the EPA issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding Sectionsection 111(d), seeking comment on the form and content of a replacement for the Clean Power Plan, if one is promulgated. In August 2018July 2019 the EPA publishedreleased its proposal to replacerepeal and replacement of the Clean Power Plan. The Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which in its current form focuses onapplies only to existing coal-fired electric generating units, proposes to determinedetermines that heat rate improvements are the best system of emission reductions.reductions and lists six candidate technologies for consideration by states at each coal unit. The rule also proposes revisions to the New Source Review program to prevent that program from being a barrier to installing heat rate improvement projects under ACE. Additionally, the rule provides states more discretion in determining how the best system for emission reductions applies to individual units, including through the consideration of technical feasibility and the remaining useful life of the facility. Comments onIn September 2019 the proposal were due in October 2018. Entergy will continue to be engaged in this rulemaking process.

Federal Jurisdiction of WatersD.C. Circuit dismissed all of the United Stateslitigation concerning the Clean Power Plan because that rule has been repealed and replaced by the Affordable Clean Energy Rule. Entergy is evaluating the final Affordable Clean Energy Rule’s impacts on its coal units and will monitor litigation challenging the rule. The EPA also has proposed a revision to the new source performance standard on greenhouse gas emissions that primarily impacts new coal units and, therefore, should not impact Entergy.

Groundwater at Certain Nuclear Sites

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2013February 2016, Entergy disclosed that elevated tritium levels had been detected in samples from several monitoring wells that are part of Indian Point’s groundwater monitoring program.  Investigation of the source of elevated tritium determined that the source was related to a temporary system to process water in preparation for the regularly scheduled refueling outage at Indian Point 2. The NRC had issued a notice of violation related to the adequacy of Entergy’s controls to prevent the introduction of radioactivity into the site groundwater. Entergy completed corrective actions and, in February 2019, the NRC concluded that Entergy had achieved full compliance and closed the violation.

Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines

The 2015 Steam Electric Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELG) rule requires, among other things, that there be no discharge of bottom ash transport water. The no-discharge requirement contains no exceptions and could cause compliance problems for Entergy’s coal facilities during heavy storm events and under certain non-routine operational conditions. The ELG rule’s compliance dates currently are delayed while the EPA reconsiders the rule. Additionally, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently vacated and remanded the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced the intention to propose a rule to clarify federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction over watersprovisions of the United States. The announcement was maderule related to legacy wastewater and leachate. A proposed rule revision on bottom ash transport water is expected in conjunctionthe third quarter 2019 which may allow some flexibility for storm events and non-routine operations, with a final rule expected by the end of the year. A separate rulemaking is expected to address the legacy wastewater and leachate issues. Despite the impending rulemaking, Entergy is implementing projects at its White Bluff and Independence plants to convert to zero-discharge systems to comply with the EPA’s release of a draft scientific report on the “connectivity” of waters that the agency said would inform the rulemaking. This report was finalized in January 2015. The finalELG rule was published in the Federal Register in June 2015. The rule could significantly increase the number and types of waters included in the EPA’s and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdiction, which in turn could pose additional permitting and pollutant management burdens on Entergy’s operations. The final rule has been challenged in various federal courts by several parties, including most states. In September 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction staying the 2015 rule in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The 2015 rule now is stayed throughout Entergy’s utility service territory. Entergy will continue to monitor this rulemaking and litigation.

Coal Combustion Residuals

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2016 the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act) was signed into law, which authorizes states to regulate coal ash rather than leaving primary enforcement to citizen suit actions. States may submit to the EPA proposals for a permit program. In September 2017 the EPA agreed to reconsider certain provisions of the coal combustion residuals (CCR) rule in light ofrestrictions on impoundments. Additionally, the WIIN Act. In March 2018 the EPA published its proposed revisions to the CCR rule with comments due at the end of April 2018. In July 2018 the EPA released its initial revisions extending certain deadlines and incorporating some risk-based standards.   The EPA is expected to release additional revisions in another rulemaking.  In August 2018 the D.C. Circuit vacated several provisions of the CCR rule on the basis that they were inconsistent with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and remanded the matter to the EPA to conduct further rulemaking.

Other Environmental Matters

Entergy Texas

In December 2016 a transformer inside the Hartburg, Texas Substation had an internal fault resulting in a release of approximately 15,000 gallons of non-PCB mineral oil. Cleanup ensued immediately; however, rain caused much of the oil to spread across the substation yard and into a nearby wetland. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the National Response Center were immediately notified, and the TCEQ responded to the site approximately two hours after the cleanup was initiated. The remediation liability is estimated at $2.2 million; however, this number could fluctuate depending on the remediation extent and wetland mitigation requirements. In July 2017, Entergy entered into the Voluntary Cleanup Program with the TCEQ. Additional direction is expected from the TCEQ regarding final remediation requirements for the site. In November 2017 additional soil sampling was completed in the wetland area and in February 2018, a site summary report of findings was submitted to the TCEQ. The TCEQ responded in June 2018 and has requested an ecological exclusion criteria checklist/Tier II screening-level ecological risk assessment, an additional site assessment, additional soil samples, groundwater samples, and some additional diagrams and maps. Entergy has developed andNelson 6 facility is implementing a response plan addressing the TCEQ’s requests.operational and maintenance measures to ensure its original zero-discharge design is maintained for compliance.





Item 6.  Exhibits
 *4(a)3(a) -

3(b) -
   
 4(b)3(c) -
4(c) -
4(d) -
4(e) -
4(f) -
   
 *4(g)4(a) -
   
 *4(h)4(b) -
   
 *4(i)4(c) -
   
 *4(j)4(d) -
   
 *144(e) -
4(f) -
4(g) -
   
 *31(a) -
   
 *31(b) -
   
 *31(c) -
   
 *31(d) -
   
 *31(e) -
   
 *31(f) -
   
 *31(g) -
   
 *31(h) -
   
 *31(i) -
   
 *31(j) -
   
 *31(k) -
   

 *31(l) -
   
 *31(m) -
   
 *31(n) -
   
 **32(a) -
   
 **32(b) -
   
 **32(c) -
   
 **32(d) -
   
 **32(e) -
   
 **32(f) -
   
 **32(g) -
   
 **32(h) -
   
 **32(i) -
   
 **32(j) -
   
 **32(k) -
   
 **32(l) -
   
 **32(m) -
   
 **32(n) -
   
 *101 INS -Inline XBRL Instance Document.Document - The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
   
 *101 SCH -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
   
 *101 PRE -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
   
 *101 LAB -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
   
 *101 CAL -Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
 *101 DEF -Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
*104 -Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibits 101).
___________________________
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
*Filed herewith.
**Furnished, not filed, herewith.

SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.


ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.LLC
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.LLC
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, LLC
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
 
 
/s/ Alyson M. MountKimberly A. Fontan
Alyson M. Mount
Kimberly A. Fontan
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(For each Registrant and for each as

Principal Accounting Officer)




Date:    November 5, 20182019




202204