Other income (expense), net, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations includes foreign currency transaction losses of $3.0 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Transaction gains and losses represent the revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities from the currency that will ultimately be settled into the functional currency of the legal entity holding the asset or liability. The most significant items revalued are denominated in U.S. dollars on entities with British pound sterling and Nigerian naira functional currencies and denominated in British pound sterling on entities with U.S. dollar functional currencies, with transaction gains or losses primarily resulting from the strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar versus those other currencies.

Our earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of losses, are also affected by the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the reported results of our unconsolidated affiliates. During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of losses, decreased by $2.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, as a result of the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the earnings of our unconsolidated affiliates, primarily the impact of changes in the Brazilian real to U.S. dollar exchange rate on earnings for our affiliate in Brazil. The value of the Brazilian real has fluctuated relative to the U.S. dollar as indicated in the following table:

We estimate that the fluctuation of currencies versus the same period in the prior fiscal year had the following effect on our financial condition and results of operations (in thousands):

During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

As of June 30 and March 31, 2018, the allowance for doubtful accounts for non-affiliates was $3.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively. There were no allowances for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable due from affiliates as of June 30 and March 31, 2018. The allowance for doubtful accounts for non-affiliates as of June 30 and March 31, 2018 primarily relates to amounts due from a customer in Nigeria for which we no longer believe collection is probable.

As of June 30 and March 31, 2018, prepaid expenses and other current assets included the short-term portion of contract acquisition and pre-operating costs totaling $10.1 million and $10.8 million, respectively, related to the search and rescue (“SAR”) contracts in the U.K. and two customer contracts in Norway, which are recoverable under the contracts and will be expensed over the terms of the contracts. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we expensed $2.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related to these contracts.

Goodwill is recorded when the cost of acquired businesses exceeds the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but is assessed for impairment annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists.

Goodwill of $19.2 million and $19.9 million as of June 30 and March 31, 2018, respectively, related to our Asia Pacific reporting unit was as follows (in thousands):

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Intangible assets by type were as follows (in thousands):

Future amortization expense of intangible assets for each of the years ending March 31 is as follows (in thousands):

The Bristow Norway AS and Eastern Airways International Limited (“Eastern Airways”) acquisitions, included in our Europe Caspian region, resulted in intangible assets for customer contracts, customer relationships, trade names and trademarks, internally developed software and licenses. The Capiteq Limited, operating under the name Airnorth, acquisition included in our Asia Pacific region, resulted in intangible assets for customer contracts, customer relationships and trade name and trademarks.

The following table presents details on the aircraft sold or disposed of and impairments on assets held for sale during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

During fiscal year 2018, we reached agreements with original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) to recover approximately $136.0 million related to ongoing aircraft issues, of which $125.0 million was realized during fiscal year 2018 and $11.0 million was recovered during the three months ended June 30, 2018. To reflect the amount realized from these OEM cost recoveries during fiscal year 2018, we recorded a $94.5 million decrease in the carrying value of certain aircraft in our fleet through a decrease in property and equipment – at cost, reduced rent expense by $16.6 million and recorded a deferred liability of $13.9 million, included in other accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits, related to a reduction in rent expense to be recorded in future periods, of which $3.5 million was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2018. We determined the realized portion of the cost recoveries related to a long-term performance issue with the aircraft, requiring a reduction of carrying value for owned aircraft and a reduction in rent expense for leased aircraft. For the owned aircraft, we allocated the $94.5 million as a reduction in carrying value by reducing the historical acquisition value of each affected aircraft on a pro-rata basis utilizing the historical acquisition value of the aircraft. We revised our salvage values for each affected aircraft by reducing the historical acquisition value by the applicable amount and applying our stated salvage value percentage for owned aircraft of 50%. In accordance with accounting standards, we will recognize the change in depreciation due to the reduction in carrying value and revision of salvage values on a prospective basis over the remaining life of the aircraft. This will result in a reduction of depreciation expense of $6.4 million during the remainder of fiscal year 2019, $8.4 million during fiscal year 2020, $5.6 million during fiscal year 2021 and $21.3 million during fiscal year 2022 and beyond. For the leased aircraft, we will recognize the remaining deferred liability of $10.4 million as a reduction in rent expense prospectively on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease terms. This will result

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we recovered the remaining $11.0 million in OEM cost recoveries by agreeing to net certain amounts previously accrued for aircraft leases and capital expenditures against those recoveries. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded a $7.6 million increase in revenue and a $1.1 million decrease in direct cost. We expect to realize the remaining $2.3 million recovery during fiscal year 2019 as follows: $1.0 million decrease in direct cost in the three months ended September 30, 2018, $1.0 million decrease in direct cost in the three months ended December 31, 2018 and $0.3 million decrease in direct cost in the three months ended March 31, 2019. The increase in revenue relates to compensation for lost revenue in prior periods from the late delivery of aircraft and the decreases in direct cost over fiscal year 2019 relate to prior costs we have incurred and future costs we expect to incur.

Other accrued liabilities of $51.3 million and $66.0 million as of June 30 and March 31, 2018, respectively, includes the following:

We consider the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (“ASUs”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued accounting guidance on revenue recognition replacing the existing accounting standard and industry-specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. This new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted the standard as of April 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method applied to open contracts and only to the version of the contracts in effect as of April 1, 2018. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reflected in accordance with our historical accounting policy. There was no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements and no cumulative effect adjustment was recognized. For further details, see Note 2.

In February 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance which amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. This accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Additionally, this accounting guidance requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. We have not yet adopted this standard and are currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on our financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity transfer of assets other than inventory. This accounting guidance requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs and eliminates the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. This accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We adopted this accounting guidance effective April 1, 2018 using the

In January 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The amendment provides criteria for determining when a transaction involves the acquisition of a business. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, then the transaction does not involve the acquisition of a business. If the criteria are not met, then the amendment requires that to be considered a business, the operation must include at a minimum an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output. The guidance may reduce the number of transactions accounted for as business acquisitions. This accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively, and no disclosures are required at the effective date. We adopted this accounting guidance effective April 1, 2018. This accounting guidance has had no impact on our financial statements since adoption as we have not entered into any transactions during this period.

In March 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic post-retirement benefit cost. The accounting guidance requires employers to disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and disclose the amount of net benefit cost that is included in the statement of operations or capitalized in assets, by line item. The accounting guidance requires employers to report the service cost component in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs and to report other pension-related costs (which include interest costs, amortization of pension-related costs from prior periods, and the gains or losses on plan assets) separately and exclude them from the subtotal of operating income. The accounting guidance also allows only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted as of the first interim period of an annual period for which interim or annual financial statements have not been issued. The accounting guidance requires application on a retrospective basis for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic post-retirement benefit cost in the statement of operations and on a prospective basis for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic post-retirement benefit in assets. We adopted this accounting guidance effective April 1, 2018 and our statement of operations was retrospectively adjusted by $0.1 million with an increase in direct cost and a corresponding credit in other income (expense), net for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

In February 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on income statement reporting of comprehensive income, specifically pertaining to reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is applied prospectively to changes in terms or conditions of awards occurring on or after the adoption date. We have not yet adopted this accounting guidance and are currently evaluating the effect this accounting guidance will have on our financial statements.

In general, we recognize revenue when a service is provided or a good is sold to a customer and there is a contract. At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in our contracts with customers and identify all performance obligations for each distinct promise that transfers a good or service (or bundle of goods or services) to the customer. To identify the performance obligations, we consider all goods or services promised in the contract, whether explicitly stated or implied based on customary business practices. Revenue is recognized when control of the identified distinct goods or services have been transferred to the customer, the transaction price is determined and allocated to the performed performance obligations and we have determined that collection has occurred or is probable of occurring.

A majority of our revenue from contracts with customers is currently generated through two types of contracts: helicopter services and fixed wing services. Each contract type has a single distinct performance obligation as described below.

Helicopter services — Our customers — major integrated, national and independent offshore energy companies — charter our helicopters primarily to transport personnel between onshore bases and offshore production platforms, drilling rigs and other installations. To a lesser extent, our customers also charter our helicopters to transport time-sensitive equipment to these offshore locations. The customers for SAR services include both the oil and gas industry and governmental agencies. Revenue from helicopter services is recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied over time based on contractual rates as the related services are performed.

A performance obligation arises under contracts with customers to render services and is the unit of account under the new accounting guidance for revenue. Operating revenue from our oil and gas segment is derived mainly from fixed-term contracts with our customers, a substantial portion of which is competitively bid. A small portion of our oil and gas customer revenue is derived from providing services on an "ad-hoc" basis. Our fixed-term contracts typically have original terms of one year to seven years (subject to provisions permitting early termination by our customers). We account for services rendered separately if they are distinct and the service is separately identifiable from other items provided to a customer and if a customer can benefit from the services rendered on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. Within this contract type for helicopter services, we determined that each contract has a single distinct performance obligation. These services include a fixed monthly rate for a particular model of aircraft, and flight hour services, which represents the variable component of a typical contract with a customer. Rates for these services vary depending on the type of services provided and can be based on a per flight hour, per day, or per month basis. Variable charges within our flight services contracts are not effective until a customer-initiated flight order is received and the actual hours flown are determined; therefore, the associated flight revenue generally cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated beforehand. A contract’s standalone selling prices are determined based upon the prices that we charge for our services rendered. Revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied over time, by measuring progress towards satisfying the contracted services in a manner that best depicts the transfer of services to the customer, which is generally represented by a period of 30 days or less. We typically invoice customers on a monthly basis and the term between invoicing and when the payment is due is typically between 30 and 60 days. In order to offset potential increases in operating costs, our long-term contracts may provide for periodic increases in the contractual rates charged for our services. We recognize the impact of these rates when estimable and applicable, which generally includes written acknowledgment from the customers that they are in agreement with the amount of the rate escalation. Cost reimbursements from customers are recorded as reimbursable revenue with the related reimbursed costs recorded as reimbursable expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities and revenue are reported on a net basis in our financial statements. Thus, we exclude taxes imposed on the customer and collected on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies from the transaction price in determining the revenue related to contracts with a customer.

Fixed wing services — Eastern Airways and Airnorth provide fixed wing transportation services through regular passenger transport (scheduled airline service with individual ticket sales) and charter services. A performance obligation arises under contracts with customers to render services and is the unit of account under the new accounting guidance for revenue. Within fixed wing services, we determined that each contract has a single distinct performance obligation. Revenue is recognized over time at the earlier of the period in which the service is provided or the period in which the right to travel expires, which is determined by the terms and conditions of the ticket. Ticket sales are recorded within deferred revenue in accordance with the above policy. Both chartered and scheduled airline service revenue is recognized net of passenger taxes and discounts.

We generally satisfy performance of contract obligations by providing helicopter and fixed wing services to our customers in exchange for consideration. The timing of performance may differ from the timing of the customer’s payment, which results in the recognition of a contract asset or a contract liability. A contract asset exists when we have a contract with a customer for which revenue has been recognized (i.e. services have been performed), but customer payment is contingent on a future event (i.e. satisfaction of additional performance obligations). These contract assets are transferred to receivables when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Contract liabilities relate to deferred revenue in which advance consideration is received from customers for contracts where revenue is recognized on future performance of services.

As of June 30 and March 31, 2018, receivables related to services performed under contracts with customers were $195.6 million and $176.5 million, respectively. All receivables from non-affiliates and affiliates are broken out further in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized $9.1 million of revenue from outstanding contract liabilities as of March 31, 2018. Contract liabilities related to services performed under contracts with customers was $13.3 million as of June 30 and March 31, 2018. Contract liabilities are primarily generated by our fixed wing services where customers pay for tickets in advance of receiving our services and advanced payments from helicopter services customers. There were no contract assets as of June 30 and March 31, 2018.

For the three months ended June 30, 2018, there was $1.0 million of revenue recognized from satisfied performance obligations related to prior periods (for example, due to changes in transaction price).

In accordance with the new revenue standard requirements discussed in Note 1, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2018 follows (in thousands):

No cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings was required upon adoption on April 1, 2018.

Remaining performance obligations represent firm contracts for which work has not been performed and future revenue recognition is expected. The table below discloses (1) the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) as of the end of the reporting period and (2) the expected timing to recognize this revenue (in thousands).

Although substantially all of our revenue is under contract, due to the nature of our business we do not have significant remaining performance obligations as our contracts typically include unilateral termination clauses that allow our customers to terminate existing contracts with a notice period of 30 to 180 days. The table above includes performance obligations up to the point where the parties can cancel existing contracts. Any applicable cancellation penalties have been excluded. As such, our actual remaining performance obligation revenue is expected to be greater than what is reflected above. In addition, the remaining performance obligation disclosure does not include expected consideration related to performance obligations of a variable nature (i.e., flight services) as they cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated.

We were awarded a government contract to provide SAR services for all of the U.K., which commenced in April 2015. We previously incurred costs related to this contract that generate or enhance the resources used to fulfill the performance obligation within the contract and the costs are expected to be recoverable. These contract acquisition and pre-operating costs qualify for capitalization. We amortize these capitalized contract acquisition and pre-operating costs related to the UK SAR contract and two customer contracts in Norway. We determined that an amortization method that allocates the capitalized costs on a relative basis to the revenue recognized is a reasonable and systematic basis for the amortization of the pre-operating costs asset. For further details on the short and long-term pre-operating cost balances, see Note 1.

We incur incremental direct costs for obtaining contracts through sales commissions paid to ticket agents to sell seats on regular public transportation flights for our fixed-wing services only. We will utilize the practical expedient allowed by the FASB that permits us to expense the incremental costs of obtaining a contract when incurred, if the amortization period of the contract asset that we otherwise would have recognized is one year or less.

In addition, we have applied the tax practical expedient to exclude all taxes in the scope of the election from the transaction price and the invoice practical expedient that allows us to recognize revenue in the amount to which we have the right to invoice the customer and corresponds directly with the value to the customer of our performance completed to date.

A VIE is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If we determine that we have operating power and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits, we consolidate the VIE as the primary beneficiary, and if not, we do not consolidate.

The Company, Caledonia, the E.U. Investor and Bristow Aviation have entered into a shareholder agreement respecting, among other things, the composition of the board of directors of Bristow Aviation. On matters coming before Bristow Aviation’s board, Caledonia’s representatives have a total of three votes and the two other directors have one vote each. In addition, Caledonia has the right to nominate two persons to our board of directors and to replace any such directors so nominated, provided that Caledonia owned (1) at least 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company or (2) at least 49% of the total outstanding shares of Bristow Aviation. According to Caledonia’s most recent Form 13F filed with the SEC on July 10, 2018, Caledonia was no longer the direct beneficial owner of any shares of our common stock as of June 30, 2018. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Master Agreement dated December 12, 1996 among Caledonia and the Company, Caledonia does not currently satisfy the requirements to designate directors for nomination to our board of directors.

Caledonia, the Company and the E.U. Investor also have entered into a put/call agreement under which, upon giving specified prior notice, we have the right to buy all the Bristow Aviation shares held by Caledonia and the E.U. Investor, who, in turn, each have the right to require us to purchase such shares. Under current English law, we would be required, in order for Bristow Aviation to retain its operating license, to find a qualified E.U. investor to own any Bristow Aviation shares we have the right to acquire under the put/call agreement. The only restriction under the put/call agreement limiting our ability to exercise the put/call option is a requirement to consult with the Civil Aviation Authority (the “CAA”) in the U.K. regarding the suitability of the new holder of the Bristow Aviation shares. The put/call agreement does not contain any provisions should the CAA not approve the new E.U. investor. However, we would work diligently to find an E.U. investor suitable to the CAA. The amount by which we could purchase the shares of the other investors holding 51% of the equity of Bristow Aviation is fixed under the terms of the call option, and we have reflected this amount on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as noncontrolling interest.

Bristow Aviation and its subsidiaries are exposed to similar operational risks and are therefore monitored and evaluated on a similar basis by management. Accordingly, the financial information reflected on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations for Bristow Aviation and subsidiaries is presented in the aggregate, including intercompany amounts with other consolidated entities, as follows (in thousands):

In order to be able to bid competitively for our services in the Nigerian market, we were required to identify local citizens to participate in the ownership of entities domiciled in the region. However, these owners do not have extensive knowledge of the aviation industry and have historically deferred to our expertise in the overall management and day-to-day operation of BHNL (including the establishment of operating and capital budgets and strategic decisions regarding the potential expansion of BHNL’s operations). We have also historically provided subordinated financial support to BHNL and will need to continue to do so unless and until BHNL acquires sufficient equity to permit itself to finance its activities without that additional support from us. As we have the power to direct the most significant activities affecting the economic performance and ongoing success of BHNL and hold a variable interest in the entity in the form of our equity investment and working capital infusions, we consolidate BHNL as the primary beneficiary. The employee-owned Nigerian entity referenced above purchased a 19% interest in BHNL in December 2013 with proceeds from a loan received from BGI Aviation Technical Services Nigeria Limited (“BATS”). In July 2014, the employee-owned Nigerian entity purchased an additional 29% interest with proceeds from a loan received from Bristow Helicopters (International) Limited (“BHIL”). In April 2015, Bristow Helicopters purchased an additional 8% interest in BHNL and the employee-owned Nigerian entity purchased an additional 2% interest with proceeds from a loan received from BHIL. Both BATS

BHNL is an indirect subsidiary of Bristow Aviation; therefore, financial information for this entity is included within the amounts for Bristow Aviation and its subsidiaries presented above.

The activities that most significantly impact PAAN’s economic performance relate to the day-to-day operation of PAAN, setting the operating and capital budgets and strategic decisions regarding the potential expansion of PAAN’s operations. Throughout the history of PAAN, our representation on the board and our secondment to PAAN of its managing director has enabled us to direct the key operational decisions of PAAN (without objection from the other board members). We have also historically provided subordinated financial support to PAAN. As we have the power to direct the most significant activities affecting the economic performance and ongoing success of PAAN and hold a variable interest in the form of our equity investment and working capital infusions, we consolidate PAAN as the primary beneficiary. However, as long as we own a majority interest in PAAN, the separate presentation of financial information in a tabular format for PAAN is not required.

The remaining debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the 4½% Convertible Senior Notes using the effective interest rate. The effective interest rate for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was 11.0%. Interest expense related to our 4½% Convertible Senior Notes for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was as follows (in thousands):

Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are categorized into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement, as follows:

The majority of our non-financial assets, which include inventories, property and equipment, assets held for sale, goodwill and other intangible assets, are not required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur such that a non-financial asset is required to be evaluated for impairment and deemed to be impaired, the impaired non-financial asset is recorded at its fair value.

The following table summarizes the assets as of June 30, 2017, valued at fair value on a non-recurring basis (in thousands): 

The fair value of inventories using Level 2 inputs is determined by evaluating the current economic conditions for sale and disposal of spare parts, which includes estimates as to the recoverability of the carrying value of the parts based on historical experience with sales and disposal of similar spare parts, the expected time frame of sales or disposals, the location of the spare parts to be sold and the condition of the spare parts to be sold or otherwise disposed of.

The fair value of assets held for sale using Level 2 inputs is determined through evaluation of expected sales proceeds for aircraft. This analysis includes estimates based on historical experience with sales, recent transactions involving similar assets, quoted market prices for similar assets and condition and location of aircraft to be sold or otherwise disposed of. The loss for the three months ended June 30, 2017 related to two aircraft held for sale.

The rabbi trust investments consist of cash and mutual funds whose fair value are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, and are designated as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy. The rabbi trust holds investments related to our non-qualified deferred compensation plan for our senior executives. The derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency put option contracts whose fair value is determined by quoted market prices of the same or similar instruments, adjusted for counterparty risk. See Note 6 for a discussion of our derivative financial instruments.

The fair value of our debt has been estimated in accordance with the accounting standard regarding fair value. The fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt is estimated based on quoted market prices.prices and has not been updated for any possible acceleration provisions in our debt instruments. The carrying and fair value of our debt, excluding unamortized debt issuance costs, are as follows (in thousands):