Table of contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 20152016

or

£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to _________

Commission File Number 001-37419
logo123114a08.jpg
PDC ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware95-2636730
(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1775 Sherman Street, Suite 3000
Denver, Colorado 80203
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 860-5800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Tx No £o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes T xNo £o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer  x
Accelerated filer  o
Non-accelerated filer  £o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ oNo Tx

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 40,107,52456,266,147 shares of the Company's Common Stock ($0.01 par value) were outstanding as of October 16, 2015.17, 2016.


Table of contents


PDC ENERGY, INC.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page
    
Item 1.Financial Statements  
  
  
  
 
 
Item 2. 
Item 3. 
Item 4. 
    
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
    
Item 1. 
Item 1A. 
Item 2. 
Item 3. 
Item 4. 
Item 5. 
Item 6. 
    
  




Table of contents



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in and incorporated by reference into this report are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States ("U.S.") Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements herein. These statements relate to, among other things: the closing of pending transactions and the effects of such transactions, including the fact that the pending Delaware Basin acquisition is subject to continuing diligence between the parties and accordingly, may not occur within the expected timeframe or at all; estimated future production (including the components of such production), sales, expenses, cash flows, liquidity and liquidity;balance sheet attributes; estimated crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) reserves, including 2015 year-end reserves; expected 2015 capital forecast allocations, including revised capital and production forecasts and that we expect to meet or exceed the high end of our range; anticipated increased 2015 capital projects and expenditures; expected year-end exit rates; the impact of prolonged depressed commodity prices; the Utica Shale impairmentprices, including potentially reduced production and other potential future impairments;associated cash flow; anticipated capital projects, expenditures and opportunities; expected capital budget allocations; our operational flexibility and ability to revise our development plan, either upward or downward; availability of sufficient funding and liquidity for our 2015 capital program and sources of that funding; expected positive net settlements on derivatives for the remainder of 2016; that we expect quarter-over-quarter production growth; future exploration, drilling and development activities, including our expected rig countnon-operated activity, the number of drilling rigs we expect to run and lateral lengths of wells, including the number of rigs we expect to run in both the Utica Shale and Wattenberg Field; expectation of cash flows in 2015 and 2016; potential additional revisions to our 2015 capital and production forecast; anticipated reductions in our 2015 cost structure; the expiration of certain leases and our current development plan2017 in the Utica Shale;Delaware Basin; expected 2016 production and cash flow ranges and timing of turn-in-lines; our evaluation method of our customers' and derivative counterparties' credit risk, including certain of our gas marketing customers; our expected positive net settlements on our derivative positions and effect on cash flow in 2015;risk; effectiveness of our derivative program in providing a degree of price stability; the impactpotential for future impairments; expected sustained relief of high line pressures and the timing, availability, cost and effect of additional midstream facilities and services going forward; expected differentials;gathering system pressure; compliance with debt covenants; expected funding sources for anticipated net settlement of our 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2016; the impact of litigation on our results of operations and financial position; that we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future; and our future strategies, plans and objectives.

The above statements are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements herein. Although forward-looking statements contained in this report reflect our good faith judgment, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known to us. Forward-looking statements are always subject to risks and uncertainties, and become subject to greater levels of risk and uncertainty as they address matters further into the future. Throughout this report or accompanying quarterly materials, we may use the terms “outlook,” “projection” or similar terms or expressions, or indicate that we have “modeled” certain future scenarios. We typically use these terms to indicate our current thoughts on possible outcomes relating to our business or the industry in periods beyond the current fiscal year. In additionBecause such statements relate to beingevents or conditions further in the future, they are subject to additionalincreased levels of uncertainty generally, forward-looking statements regarding such prospective matters do not necessarily reflect the outcomes we view as the most likely to occur, but instead are shown to illustrate aspects of our business in the context of a variety of scenarios we believe to be plausible.uncertainty.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

changes in worldwide production volumes and demand, including economic conditions that might impact demand;
volatility of commodity prices for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs and the risk of an extended period of depressed prices;
reductions in the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility;
impact of governmental policies and/or regulations, including changes in environmental and other laws, the interpretation and enforcement related to those laws and regulations, liabilities arising thereunder and the costs to comply with those laws and regulations;
potential declines in the value of our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs properties resulting in further impairments;
changes in estimates of proved reserves;
inaccuracy of reserve estimates and expected production rates;
potential for production decline rates from our wells being greater than expected;
timing and extent of our success in discovering, acquiring, developing and producing reserves;
our ability to secure leases, drilling rigs, supplies and services at reasonable prices;
availability of sufficient pipeline, gathering and other transportation facilities and related infrastructure to process and transport our production and the impact of these facilities and regional capacity on the prices we receive for our production;
timing and receipt of necessary regulatory permits;
risks incidental to the drilling and operation of crude oil and natural gas wells;
future cash flows, liquidity and financial condition;
competition within the oil and gas industry;
availability and cost of capital;
reductions in the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility;
our success in marketing crude oil, natural gas and NGLs;
effect of crude oil and natural gas derivatives activities;
impact of environmental events, governmental and other third-party responses to such events, and our ability to insure adequately against such events;
cost of pending or future litigation;
effect that acquisitions we may pursue have on our capital expenditures;
our ability to retain or attract senior management and key technical employees; and
success of strategic plans, expectations and objectives for our future operations.
 
Further, we urge you to carefully review and consider the cautionary statements and disclosures, specifically those under the heading "Risk Factors," made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142015 (the


Table of contents


"2014 "2015 Form 10-K"), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 19, 2015,22, 2016, and our other filings with the SEC for further information on risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, which


Table of contents


are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance occurring after the date of this report or currently unknown facts or conditions or the occurrence of unanticipated events. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

REFERENCES

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to "PDC Energy," "PDC," "the Company," "we," "us," "our" or "ours" refer to the registrant, PDC Energy, Inc. and all subsidiaries consolidated for the purposes of its financial statements, including our proportionate share of the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and operating activities of our affiliated partnerships and PDC Mountaineer, LLC ("PDCM"), a joint venture owned, until October 2014, 50% each by PDC and Lime Rock Partners, LP.partnerships. See Note 1, Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a description of our consolidated subsidiaries.


Table of contents


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PDC ENERGY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited; in thousands, except share and per share data)
 September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $3,690
 $16,066
 $1,197,692
 $850
Accounts receivable, net 106,776
 131,204
 99,895
 104,274
Fair value of derivatives 208,144
 187,495
 65,604
 221,659
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 7,683
 5,954
 4,854
 5,266
Total current assets 326,293
 340,719
 1,368,045
 332,049
Properties and equipment, net 1,873,327
 1,800,186
 1,932,274
 1,940,552
Assets held for sale 2,874
 2,874
Fair value of derivatives 73,049
 112,819
 8,423
 44,387
Other assets 68,767
 83,990
 108,538
 53,555
Total Assets $2,344,310
 $2,340,588
 $3,417,280
 $2,370,543
        
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity        
Liabilities        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $65,337
 $130,321
 $62,350
 $92,613
Production tax liability 26,159
 21,314
 22,141
 26,524
Fair value of derivatives 2,245
 570
 22,563
 1,595
Funds held for distribution 32,780
 27,186
 51,107
 29,894
Current portion of long-term debt 112,063
 
 
 112,940
Accrued interest payable 19,881
 9,109
 19,364
 9,057
Deferred income taxes 52,188
 59,174
Other accrued expenses 25,146
 62,717
 41,756
 28,709
Total current liabilities 335,799
 310,391
 219,281
 301,332
Long-term debt 550,000
 664,923
 1,041,575
 529,437
Deferred income taxes 87,907
 125,693
 44,340
 143,452
Asset retirement obligation 71,616
 71,992
 82,509
 84,032
Fair value of derivatives 723
 197
 17,885
 695
Other liabilities 18,529
 30,033
 25,630
 24,398
Total liabilities 1,064,574
 1,203,229
 1,431,220
 1,083,346
        
Commitments and contingent liabilities 
 
 
 
        
Shareholders' equity        
Preferred shares - par value $0.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued 
 
 
 
Common shares - par value $0.01 per share, 150,000,000 authorized, 40,121,608 and 35,927,985 issued as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively 401
 359
Common shares - par value $0.01 per share, 150,000,000 authorized, 56,280,544 and 40,174,776 issued as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively 563
 402
Additional paid-in capital 903,038
 689,209
 1,796,664
 907,382
Retained earnings 377,400
 448,702
 190,133
 380,422
Treasury shares - at cost, 22,418 and 21,643 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively (1,103) (911)
Treasury shares - at cost, 25,854 and 20,220
as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 (1,300) (1,009)
Total shareholders' equity 1,279,736
 1,137,359
 1,986,060
 1,287,197
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $2,344,310
 $2,340,588
 $3,417,280
 $2,370,543



See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1

Table of contents


PDC ENERGY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2016 2015 2016 2015
Revenues                
Crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales $104,483
 $120,526
 $275,520
 $371,556
 $141,805
 $104,483
 $328,013
 $275,520
Sales from natural gas marketing 2,580
 13,297
 8,336
 62,649
 2,678
 2,580
 6,728
 8,336
Commodity price risk management gain, net 123,549
 90,213
 141,170
 12,661
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net 19,397
 123,549
 (62,348) 141,170
Well operations, pipeline income and other 488
 520
 1,666
 1,650
 10
 488
 2,425
 1,666
Total revenues 231,100
 224,556
 426,692
 448,516
 163,890
 231,100
 274,818
 426,692
Costs, expenses and other                
Production costs 25,484
 22,754
 71,129
 64,611
Lease operating expenses 14,001
 13,825
 43,006
 42,749
Production taxes 9,568
 5,476
 19,682
 13,206
Transportation, gathering and processing expenses 5,048
 3,938
 13,554
 6,584
Cost of natural gas marketing 2,781
 13,347
 8,875
 62,645
 3,092
 2,781
 7,795
 8,875
Exploration expense 252
 190
 812
 773
 241
 252
 688
 812
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties 153,535
 1,863
 158,792
 3,621
Impairment of properties and equipment 933
 154,031
 6,104
 161,207
General and administrative expense 18,528
 34,625
 55,875
 96,549
 32,510
 20,277
 78,868
 62,050
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 80,947
 49,640
 206,873
 142,165
 112,927
 80,947
 317,329
 206,873
Provision for uncollectible notes receivable (700) 
 44,038
 
Accretion of asset retirement obligations 1,594
 861
 4,742
 2,542
 1,777
 1,594
 5,400
 4,742
(Gain) loss on sale of properties and equipment (74) 21
 (302) 577
Gain on sale of properties and equipment (219) (74) (43) (302)
Total cost, expenses and other 283,047
 123,301
 506,796
 373,483
 179,178
 283,047
 536,421
 506,796
Income (loss) from operations (51,947) 101,255
 (80,104) 75,033
Loss from operations (15,288) (51,947) (261,603) (80,104)
Interest expense (12,092) (11,821) (35,384) (36,199) (20,193) (12,092) (42,759) (35,384)
Interest income 1,378
 39
 3,626
 309
 140
 1,378
 1,875
 3,626
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (62,661) 89,473
 (111,862) 39,143
Loss before income taxes (35,341) (62,661) (302,487) (111,862)
Provision for income taxes 21,167
 (35,396) 40,560
 (15,852) 12,032
 21,167
 112,198
 40,560
Income (loss) from continuing operations (41,494) 54,077
 (71,302) 23,291
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 (80) 
 392
Net income (loss) $(41,494) $53,997
 $(71,302) $23,683
Net loss $(23,309) $(41,494) $(190,289) $(71,302)
                
Earnings per share:                
Basic         $(0.48) $(1.04) $(4.16) $(1.84)
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(1.04) $1.51
 $(1.84) $0.65
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 
 
 0.01
Net income (loss) $(1.04) $1.51
 $(1.84) $0.66
        
Diluted         $(0.48) $(1.04) $(4.16) $(1.84)
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(1.04) $1.47
 $(1.84) $0.63
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 
 
 0.01
Net income (loss) $(1.04) $1.47
 $(1.84) $0.64
                
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:                
Basic 40,085
 35,834
 38,837
 35,763
 48,839
 40,085
 45,741
 38,837
Diluted 40,085
 36,828
 38,837
 36,831
 48,839
 40,085
 45,741
 38,837
                
 

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2

Table of contents


PDC ENERGY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited; in thousands)
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net income (loss) $(71,302) $23,683
Adjustments to net income (loss) to reconcile to net cash from operating activities:    
Net loss $(190,289) $(71,302)
Adjustments to net loss to reconcile to net cash from operating activities:    
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives 21,322
 (34,323) 230,177
 21,322
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 206,873
 151,293
 317,329
 206,873
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties 158,792
 4,054
Provision for uncollectible notes receivable 44,038
 
Impairment of properties and equipment 6,104
 161,207
Accretion of asset retirement obligation 4,742
 2,582
 5,400
 4,742
Stock-based compensation 14,278
 13,111
 15,205
 14,278
(Gain) loss on sale of properties and equipment (302) 384
Gain on sale of properties and equipment (43) (302)
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs 5,308
 5,206
 12,951
 5,308
Deferred income taxes (44,770) 14,981
 (114,136) (44,770)
Non-cash interest income (3,624) 
 (1,194) (3,624)
Other 2,241
 (759) 668
 (174)
Changes in assets and liabilities (10,552) 21,753
 34,621
 (10,552)
Net cash from operating activities 283,006
 201,965
 360,831
 283,006
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Capital expenditures (489,036) (451,081) (353,722) (489,036)
Acquisition of crude oil and natural gas properties (100,000) 
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment 319
 1,587
 4,945
 319
Net cash from investing activities (488,717) (449,494) (448,777) (488,717)
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs 202,851
 
Proceeds from sale of equity, net of issuance cost 855,072
 202,851
Proceeds from senior notes 392,250
 
Proceeds from convertible senior notes 193,979
 
Proceeds from revolving credit facility 325,000
 136,750
 85,000
 325,000
Repayment of revolving credit facility (331,000) (61,000) (122,000) (331,000)
Redemption of convertible notes (115,000) 
Other (3,516) (2,726) (4,513) (3,516)
Net cash from financing activities 193,335
 73,024
 1,284,788
 193,335
Net change in cash and cash equivalents (12,376) (174,505) 1,196,842
 (12,376)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 16,066
 193,243
 850
 16,066
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $3,690
 $18,738
 $1,197,692
 $3,690
        
Supplemental cash flow information:        
Cash payments for:        
Interest, net of capitalized interest $23,467
 $24,933
 $22,975
 $23,467
Income taxes 9,936
 1,800
 167
 9,936
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Change in accounts payable related to purchases of properties and equipment $(68,529) $19,320
 $(31,497) $(68,529)
Change in asset retirement obligation, with a corresponding change to crude oil and natural gas properties, net of disposals 1,642
 500
 1,137
 1,642
Purchase of properties and equipment under capital leases 1,479
 
 1,231
 1,479

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3

Table of Contentscontents


PDC ENERGY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
(unaudited; in thousands, except share and per share data)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015
Common shares, issued:    
Shares beginning of period 40,174,776
 35,927,985
Shares issued pursuant to sale of equity 15,799,906
 4,002,000
Exercise of stock options 46,084
 
Issuance of stock awards, net of forfeitures 259,778
 191,623
Shares end of period 56,280,544
 40,121,608
Treasury shares:    
Shares beginning of period 20,220
 21,643
Purchase of treasury shares 90,695
 93,898
Issuance of treasury shares (91,895) (97,995)
Non-employee directors' deferred compensation plan 6,834
 4,872
Shares end of period 25,854
 22,418
Common shares outstanding 56,254,690
 40,099,190
     
Equity:    
Shareholders' equity    
Preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share:    
Balance beginning and end of period $
 $
Common shares, par value $0.01 per share:    
Balance beginning of period 402
 359
Shares issued pursuant to sale of equity and note conversion 158
 40
Issuance of stock awards, net of forfeitures 3
 2
Balance end of period 563
 401
Additional paid-in capital:    
Balance beginning of period 907,383
 689,209
Convertible debt discount, net of issuance costs and tax 23,264
 
Proceeds from sale of equity, net of issuance costs 854,932
 202,811
Stock-based compensation expense 15,202
 14,419
Issuance of treasury shares (5,180) (4,633)
Tax impact of stock-based compensation 1,063
 1,232
Balance end of period 1,796,664
 903,038
Retained earnings:    
Balance beginning of period 380,422
 448,702
Net loss (190,289) (71,302)
Balance end of period 190,133
 377,400
Treasury shares, at cost:    
Balance beginning of period (1,009) (911)
Purchase of treasury shares (5,106) (4,575)
Issuance of treasury shares 5,179
 4,632
Non-employee directors' deferred compensation plan (364) (249)
Balance end of period (1,300) (1,103)
Total shareholders' equity $1,986,060
 $1,279,736
     

PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 20152016
(Unaudited)(unaudited)



NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

PDC Energy, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us," or "our") is a domestic independent exploration and production company that produces, develops, acquires and explores for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs, with primary operations in the Wattenberg Field in Colorado and the Utica Shale in southeastern Ohio. Our operations in the Wattenberg Field are focused in the horizontal Niobrara and Codell plays and our Ohio operations are focused in the Utica Shale play. In addition, we currently have a pending acquisition in the Delaware Basin in Texas. See Note 6, Pending Acquisition. As of September 30, 2015,2016, we owned an interest in approximately 2,9503,000 gross wells. We are engaged in two business segments: Oil and Gas Exploration and Production and Gas Marketing. In October 2014, we sold our entire 50% ownership interest in our joint venture, PDCM, to an unrelated third-party.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PDC, our wholly-owned subsidiary Riley Natural Gas ("RNG"), and our proportionate share of our four affiliated partnerships and, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, our proportionate share of PDCM.partnerships. Pursuant to the proportionate consolidation method, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our pro rata share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the entities which we proportionately consolidate. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentationstatement of our financial statements for interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Accordingly, pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain notes and other financial information included in audited financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The December 31, 2015 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The information presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 20142015 Form 10-K. Our results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20152016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other future period.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and the International Accounting Standards Board issued their converged standard on revenue recognition that provides a single, comprehensive model that entities will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The underlying principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The standard outlines a five-step approach to apply the underlying principle: (1) identify the contract with the customer, (2) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to separate performance obligations and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied. In August 2015,March 2016, the FASB deferredissued an update to the effective datestandard intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations when recognizing revenue. The revenue standard tois effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The revenue standard can be adopted under the full retrospective method or simplified transition method. Entities are permitted to adopt the revenue standard early, beginning with annual reporting periods after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued a new standard related to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The new standard will explicitly requirerequires management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern at the end of every reporting period and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this standard in the fourth quarter of 2016. Adoption of this guidancestandard is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In November 2014,February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting update to accounting for derivativesaimed at increasing the transparency and hedging instruments. The update clarifies how current accounting guidance should be interpreted in evaluatingcomparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the economic characteristicsbalance sheet and risksdisclosing key information about related leasing arrangements. For leases with terms of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Specifically,more than 12 months, the accounting update clarifies thatrequires lessees to recognize an entity should consider all relevant termsasset for its right to use the underlying asset and features,a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the lease asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. Subsequent measurement, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluatingpresentation of expenses and cash flows, will depend upon the natureclassification of the host contract. Furthermore, the update clarifies that no single termlease as either a finance or feature would necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. Rather, the nature of the host contract depends upon the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument.operating lease. The assessment of the substance of the relevant terms and features should incorporate a consideration of the characteristics of the terms and features themselves, the circumstances under which the hybrid financial instrument was issued or acquired, and the potential outcomes of the hybrid financial instrument, as well as the likelihood of those potential outcomes. The accounting updateguidance is effective for public entitiesfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied as of the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting update on stock-based compensation intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment award transactions. Areas of simplification include income tax consequences, classification of the awards as either equity or liabilities and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this standard in the fourth quarter of 2016. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued an accounting update on statements of cash flows to address diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlywith early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance eliminating from current accounting guidance the concept of extraordinary items, which, among other things, required an entity to segregate extraordinary items considered to be unusual and infrequent from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. This guidance

4

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued an accounting update modifying existing consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015, and require either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting update simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs and requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The update did not affect the recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs. This guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued an accounting update requiring all entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued an accounting update requiring adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period of a business combination to be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The accounting update also requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement, or disclose in the notes, the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings, by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the estimated amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The accounting update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative Financial InstrumentsDetermination of Fair Value

Determination of fair value. Our fair value measurements are estimated pursuant to a fair value hierarchy that requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3). In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement in its entirety determines the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, considering factors specific to the asset or liability, and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are defined as:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived from observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.

Derivative Financial Instruments. Instruments

We measure the fair value of our derivative instruments based onupon a pricing model that utilizes market-based inputs, including, but not limited to, the contractual price of the underlying position, current market prices, crude oil and natural gas forward curves, discount rates such as the LIBOR curve for a similar duration of each outstanding position, volatility factors and nonperformance risk. Nonperformance risk considers the effect of our credit standing on the fair value of derivative liabilities and the effect of our counterparties' credit standings on the fair value of derivative assets. Both inputs to the model are based on published credit default swap rates and the duration of each outstanding derivative position.

We validate our fair value measurement through the review of counterparty statements and other supporting documentation, the determination that the source of the inputs is valid, the corroboration of the original source of inputs through access to multiple quotes, if available, or other information and monitoring changes in valuation methods and assumptions. While we use common industry practices to develop our valuation techniques and believe our valuation method is appropriate and consistent with those used by other market participants, changes in our pricing methodologies or the underlying assumptions could result in significantly different fair values.

5

PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)


Our fixed-price swaps, basis swaps and physical purchases are included in Level 2 and our collars and physical sales are included in Level 3. The following table presents, for each applicable level within the fair value hierarchy, our derivative assets and liabilities, including both current and non-current portions, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  TotalSignificant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Assets:                      
Commodity-based derivative contracts$197,331
 $83,862
 $281,193
 $237,939
   $62,356
   $300,295
$49,021
 $24,582
 $73,603
 $174,657
   $91,288
   $265,945
Basis protection derivative contracts
 
 
 19
 
 19
424
 
 424
 101
 
 101
Total assets197,331
 83,862
 281,193
 237,958
 62,356
 300,314
49,445
 24,582
 74,027
 174,758
 91,288
 266,046
Liabilities:                              
Commodity-based derivative contracts482
 
 482
 742
 
   742
30,917
 8,650
 39,567
 738
 
   738
Basis protection derivative contracts2,486
 
 2,486
 25
 
   25
881
 
 881
 1,552
 
   1,552
Total liabilities2,968
 
 2,968
 767
 
 767
31,798
 8,650
 40,448
 2,290
 
 2,290
Net asset$194,363
 $83,862
 $278,225
 $237,191
 $62,356
 $299,547
$17,647
 $15,932
 $33,579
 $172,468
 $91,288
 $263,756
                      
The following table presents a reconciliation of our Level 3 assets measured at fair value:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Fair value, net asset (liability), beginning of period $58,256
 $(6,967) $62,356
 $1,111
Changes in fair value included in statement of operations line item:        
Commodity price risk management gain, net 38,085
 12,758
 42,525
 3,961
Fair value, net asset beginning of period $27,285
 $58,256
 $91,288
 $62,356
Changes in fair value included in condensed consolidated statement of operations line item:        
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net 4,234
 38,085
 (16,023) 42,525
Sales from natural gas marketing 51
 2
 51
 (24) 
 51
 (20) 51
Settlements included in statement of operations line items:                
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net (12,530) 142
 (21,063) 882
 (15,587) (12,530) (59,243) (21,063)
Sales from natural gas marketing 
 (3) (7) 2
 
 
 (70) (7)
Fair value, net asset end of period $83,862
 $5,932
 $83,862
 $5,932
 $15,932
 $83,862
 $15,932
 $83,862
                
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives included in statement of operations line item:        
Commodity price risk management gain, net $34,564
 $11,831
 $31,794
 $673
Sales from natural gas marketing 
 1
 
 (2)
Total $34,564
 $11,832
 $31,794
 $671
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives included in condensed consolidated statement of operations line item:        
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net $(2,240) $34,564
 $(8,273) $31,794
                

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of our derivative contracts is the implied volatility curve, which is provided by a third-party vendor. A significant increase or decrease in the implied volatility, in isolation, would have a directionally similar effect resulting in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement of our Level 3 derivative contracts. There has been no change in the methodology we apply to measure the fair value of our Level 3 derivative contracts.contracts during the periods covered by this report.
    
Non-Derivative Financial Assets and Liabilities

The carrying value of the financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities excluding the current portion of long-term debt, approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

We utilize fair value on a nonrecurring basis to review our crude oil and natural gas properties for possible impairment when events and circumstances indicate a possible decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of such properties. The fair value of the properties is determined based upon estimated future discounted cash flow, a Level 3 input, using estimated production and prices at which we reasonably expect the crude oil and natural gas will be sold.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

The liability associated with our non-qualified deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors may be settled in cash or shares of our common stock. The carrying value of this obligation is based on the quoted market price of our common stock, which is a Level 1 input. The liability related to this plan, which was included in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, was immaterial as of September 30, 20152016 and December 31, 2014.2015.
 

6

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

The portion of our long-term debt related to our revolving credit facility approximates fair value due to the variable nature of related interest rates. We have not elected to account for the portion of our debt related to our senior notes under the fair value option; however, as of September 30, 20152016, we estimate the fair value of the portion of our long-term debt related to our 3.25% convertible1.125% senior notes due 20162021 to be $161.4$214.8 million, or 140.3%107.4% of par value, and the portion related6.125% senior notes due 2024 to ourbe $415.6 million, or 103.9% of par value, and 7.75% senior notes due 2022 to be $496.3$530.3 million, or 99.3%106.1% of par value. We determined these valuations based upon measurements of trading activity and broker and/or dealer quotes, respectively, which are published market prices, and therefore are Level 2 inputs.

The carrying value of our capital lease obligations approximates fair value as it representsdue to the present valuevariable nature of future lease payments.the imputed interest rates and the duration of the related vehicle lease.

Concentration of Risk

Derivative Counterparties. Our derivative arrangements expose us to credit risk of nonperformance by our counterparties. We primarily use financial institutions who are also lenders under our revolving credit facility as counterparties to our derivative contracts. To date, we have had no counterparty default losses relating to our derivative arrangements. We have evaluated the credit risk of our derivative assets from our counterparties using relevant credit market default rates, giving consideration to amounts outstanding for each counterparty and the duration of each outstanding derivative position. Based on our evaluation, we have determined that the potential impact of nonperformance of our counterparties on the fair value of our derivative instruments was not significant at September 30, 2015,2016, taking into account the estimated likelihood of nonperformance.

The following table presents the counterparties that expose us to credit risk as of September 30, 20152016 with regard to our derivative assets:

Counterparty Name Fair Value of
Derivative Assets
 Fair Value of
Derivative Assets
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1) $21,343
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A (1) $77,743
 17,929
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1) 72,977
Bank of Nova Scotia (1) 41,354
 15,166
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (1) 38,973
 9,891
NATIXIS (1) 32,941
 7,171
Key Bank N.A. (1)
 11,163
Other lenders in our revolving credit facility 6,042
 2,491
Various (2) 36
Total $281,193
 $74,027
    
__________
(1)Major lender in our revolving credit facility. See Note 7,8, Long-Term Debt.
(2)Represents a total of two counterparties.

NoteCash and Cash Equivalents.We consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk as substantially all of our deposits held in financial institutions were in excess of the FDIC insurance limits at September 30, 2016. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in the form of money market and checking accounts with financial institutions that we believe are creditworthy.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

Notes Receivable. The following table presents information regarding oura note receivable outstanding as of September 30, 2015:2016:
AmountAmount
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Note receivable:  
Principal outstanding, December 31, 2014$39,707
Principal outstanding, December 31, 2015$43,069
Paid-in-kind interest2,430
969
Principal outstanding, September 30, 2015$42,137
Principal outstanding, September 30, 201644,038
Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable(44,038)
Note receivable, net$

In October 2014, we sold our entire 50% ownership interest in PDCM to an unrelated third-party. See Note 13, Assets Held for Sale, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations, for additional information regarding the sale. As part of the consideration, we received a promissory note (the “Note”) for a principal sum of $39.0$39 million, bearing interest at varying rates beginning at 8%, and increasing annually. Pursuant to the Note agreement, interest shall be paidis payable quarterly, in arrears, commencing in December 2014 and continuing on the last business day of each fiscal quarter thereafter. At the option of the issuer of the Note, an unrelated third-party, interest can be paid-in-kind (the “PIK Interest”) and any such PIK Interest will be added to the outstanding principal amount of the Note. As of September 30, 20152016, the issuer of the Note had elected the PIK Interest option. The principal and any unpaid interest shall beis due and payable in full in September 2020 and can be prepaid in whole or in part at any time and in certain circumstanceswithout premium or penalty. If an event of default occurs under the Note agreement, the Note must be repaid prior to maturity. Any such prepayment will be made without premium or penalty. TheLegally, the Note is secured by a pledge of stock in certain subsidiaries of the unrelated third-party, debt securities and other assets.assets; however, we believe that collection of the Note is not reasonably assured.


7

TableOn a quarterly basis, we examine the Note for evidence of contentsimpairment, evaluating factors such as the creditworthiness of the issuer of the Note and the value of the underlying assets that secure the Note. We performed our quarterly evaluation and cash flow analysis as of March 31, 2016 and, based upon the unaudited year-end financial statements and reserve report of the issuer of the Note received by us in late March 2016 and existing market conditions, determined that collection of the Note and PIK Interest was not reasonably assured. As a result, we recognized a provision and recorded an allowance for uncollectible notes receivable for the $44 million outstanding balance as of March 31, 2016, which was included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet line item other assets. As of September 30, 2016, there has been no change to our assessment of the collectibility of the note or related interest since March 31, 2016. Commencing in the second quarter of 2016, we ceased recognizing interest income on the Note and are accounting for the Note under the cash basis method.
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

Under the effective interest method, we recognized $1.2 million of interest income related to the Note for the three months ended March 31, 2016, of which $1 million was PIK Interest, and we recognized $1.1 million and $3.4 million of interest income related to the Note for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,, respectively, of which $0.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, was PIK Interest. As of September 30, 2015, the $42.1 million outstanding balance on the Note was included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet line item other assets.

Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a $0.7 million provision and allowance for uncollectible notes receivable to impair a promissory note related to a previous divestiture as collection of the promissory note was not reasonably assured based on the analysis we performed as of March 31, 2016. In August 2016, we collected the $0.7 million promissory note and reversed the related provision and allowance for uncollectible notes receivable during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

NOTE 4 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our results of operations and operating cash flows are affected by changes in market prices for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. To manage a portion of our exposure to price volatility from producing crude oil and natural gas, we utilize the following economic hedging strategies for each of our business segments.

For crude oil and natural gas sales, we enter into derivative contracts to protect against price declines in future periods. While we structure these derivatives to reduce our exposure to changes in price associated with the derivative commodity, they also limit the benefit we might otherwise have received from price increases in the physical market; and
 
For natural gas marketing, we enter into fixed-price physical purchase and sale agreements that qualify as derivative contracts. In order to offset the fixed-price physical derivatives in our natural gas marketing, we enter into financial derivative instruments that have the effect of locking in the prices we will receive or pay for the same volumes and period, offsetting the physical derivative.

We believe our derivative instruments continue to be effective in achieving the risk management objectives for which they were intended. As of September 30, 20152016, we had derivative instruments, which were comprised of collars, fixed-price swaps, basis protection swaps and physical sales and purchases, in place for a portion of our anticipated production through 2018 for a total of 73,17690,425 BBtu of natural gas and 6,701
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

8,857 MBbls of crude oil. The majority of our derivative contracts are entered into at no cost to us as we hedge our anticipated production at the then-prevailing commodity market prices.

We have not elected not to designate any of our derivative instruments as hedges, and therefore do not qualify for use of hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments are recorded in the statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments related to our Oil and Gas Exploration and Production segment are recorded in commodity price risk management, net. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments related to our Gas Marketing segment are recorded in sales from and cost of natural gas marketing.


8

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

The following table presents the balance sheet location and fair value amounts of our derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets:
 Fair Value Fair Value
Derivative instruments:Derivative instruments: Balance sheet line item September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014Derivative instruments: Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet line item September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Derivative assets:Current    Current    
Commodity contracts    
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives $65,191
 $221,161
Commodity contracts    Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 270
 441
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives $207,731
 $186,886
Basis protection contracts    
Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 413
 590
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 143
 57
Basis protection contracts     65,604
 221,659
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 
 19
Non-current    
 208,144
 187,495
Commodity contracts    
Non-current    Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 8,122
 44,292
Commodity contracts    Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 20
 51
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 72,950
 112,599
Basis protection contracts    
Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 99
 220
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 281
 44
 73,049
 112,819
 8,423
 44,387
Total derivative assets $281,193
 $300,314
 $74,027
 $266,046
        
Derivative liabilities:Current    Current    
Commodity contracts    Commodity contracts    
Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives $393
 $545
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives $21,639
 $
Basis protection contracts    Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 221
 417
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 1,852
 25
Basis protection contracts    
 2,245
 570
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 703
 1,178
Non-current     22,563
 1,595
Commodity contracts    Non-current    
Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 89
 197
Commodity contracts    
Basis protection contracts    Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 17,698
 275
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 634
 
Related to natural gas marketing Fair value of derivatives 9
 46
 723
 197
Basis protection contracts    
Related to crude oil and natural gas sales Fair value of derivatives 178
 374
 17,885
 695
Total derivative liabilities $2,968
 $767
 $40,448
 $2,290

    
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

The following table presents the impact of our derivative instruments on our condensed consolidated statements of operations:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Condensed consolidated statement of operations line item 2015 2014 2015 2014 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Commodity price risk management gain, net        
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net        
Net settlements $67,993
 $(4,459) $162,454
 $(21,511) $47,728
 $67,993
 $167,859
 $162,454
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives 55,556
 94,672
 (21,284) 34,172
 (28,331) 55,556
 (230,207) (21,284)
Total commodity price risk management gain, net $123,549
 $90,213
 $141,170
 $12,661
Total commodity price risk management gain (loss), net $19,397
 $123,549
 $(62,348) $141,170
Sales from natural gas marketing                
Net settlements $165
 $210
 $561
 $(376) $122
 $165
 $420
 $561
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives (5) 170
 (298) 123
 255
 (5) (263) (298)
Total sales from natural gas marketing $160
 $380
 $263
 $(253) $377
 $160
 $157
 $263
Cost of natural gas marketing                
Net settlements $(157) $(182) $(531) $502
 $(103) $(157) $(380) $(531)
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives (5) (191) 260
 (199) (277) (5) 293
 260
Total cost of natural gas marketing $(162) $(373) $(271) $303
 $(380) $(162) $(87) $(271)
                


9

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

All of our financial derivative agreements contain master netting provisions that provide for the net settlement of all contracts through a single payment in the event of early termination. Our fixed-price physical purchase and sale agreements that qualify as derivative contracts are not subject to master netting provisions and are not significant. We have elected not to offset the fair value positions recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following table reflects the impact of netting agreements on gross derivative assets and liabilities:
As of September 30, 2015 Derivative instruments, recorded in condensed consolidated balance sheet, gross Effect of master netting agreements Derivative instruments, net
As of September 30, 2016 Derivative instruments, recorded in condensed consolidated balance sheet, gross Effect of master netting agreements Derivative instruments, net
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Asset derivatives:            
Derivative instruments, at fair value $281,193
 $(2,548) $278,645
 $74,027
 $(22,520) $51,507
            
Liability derivatives:            
Derivative instruments, at fair value $2,968
 $(2,548) $420
 $40,448
 $(22,520) $17,928
            
As of December 31, 2014 Derivative instruments, recorded in condensed consolidated balance sheet, gross Effect of master netting agreements Derivative instruments, net
As of December 31, 2015 Derivative instruments, recorded in condensed consolidated balance sheet, gross Effect of master netting agreements Derivative instruments, net
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Asset derivatives:            
Derivative instruments, at fair value $300,314
 $(29) $300,285
 $266,046
 $(1,921) $264,125
            
Liability derivatives:            
Derivative instruments, at fair value $767
 $(29) $738
 $2,290
 $(1,921) $369
            

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

NOTE 5 - PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT

The following table presents the components of properties and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A"):

September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Properties and equipment, net:      
Crude oil and natural gas properties      
Proved$2,712,759
 $2,267,165
$3,183,772
 $2,881,189
Unproved82,280
 188,206
61,838
 60,498
Total crude oil and natural gas properties2,795,039
 2,455,371
3,245,610
 2,941,687
Equipment and other32,119
 29,562
31,410
 30,098
Land and buildings9,016
 9,015
10,900
 12,667
Construction in progress99,008
 137,937
107,794
 113,115
Properties and equipment, at cost2,935,182
 2,631,885
3,395,714
 3,097,567
Accumulated DD&A(1,061,855) (831,699)(1,463,440) (1,157,015)
Properties and equipment, net$1,873,327
 $1,800,186
$1,932,274
 $1,940,552
      


10

TableIn September 2016, we closed on an acreage exchange transaction with Noble Energy, Inc. and certain of contentsits subsidiaries ("Noble") to consolidate certain acreage positions in the core area of the Wattenberg Field. Pursuant to the transaction, we exchanged leasehold acreage and, to a lesser extent, interests in certain development wells. Upon closing, we received approximately 13,500 net acres in exchange for approximately 11,700 net acres, with no cash exchanged between the parties.
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

The following table presents impairment charges recorded for crude oil and natural gas properties:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
 (in thousands)
Continuing operations:       
Impairment of proved and unproved properties$150,344
 $
 $150,344
 $
Amortization of individually insignificant unproved properties3,191
 1,085
 8,448
 2,843
Other
 778
 
 778
Total continuing operations153,535
 1,863
 158,792
 3,621
Discontinued operations:       
Amortization of individually insignificant unproved properties
 274
 
 433
Total impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties$153,535
 $2,137
 $158,792
 $4,054
        
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands)

       
Impairment of proved and unproved properties$338
 $150,840
 $2,391
 $152,764
Amortization of individually insignificant unproved properties595
 3,191
 681
 8,443
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties
933
 154,031
 3,072
 161,207
Land and buildings
 
 3,032
 
Impairment of properties and equipment$933
 $154,031
 $6,104
 $161,207

Due
NOTE 6 - PENDING ACQUISITION
In August 2016, we entered into acquisition agreements to purchase Arris Petroleum Corporation (“Arris”) and the assets of 299 Resources, LLC, 299 Production, LLC and 299 Pipeline, LLC (collectively, “299 Sellers”) pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions of those agreements, we have agreed to acquire an aggregate of approximately 57,000 net acres, approximately 30 wells and other related midstream infrastructure in Reeves and Culberson Counties, Texas, for an aggregate consideration to Arris and 299 Sellers of approximately $915 million in cash and approximately 9.4 million shares of our common stock (valued at approximately $590 million at the time the acquisition agreements were executed), subject to certain adjustments, and ongoing due diligence (the "Delaware Basin Acquisition"). The acquisition agreements allow the sellers to include a significant declinespecified amount of additional leases in commodity pricesthe transaction, which would increase the purchase price. Upon executing the acquisition agreements, we paid a $100 million deposit toward the cash portion of the purchase price into an escrow account, which is included in other assets in our September 30, 2016 condensed consolidated balance sheet. In some circumstances set forth in the acquisition agreements, we could be required to forfeit the $100 million deposit. The acquisition is expected to close in December 2016; however, there can be no assurance that conditions to closing will be satisfied.
In order to fund the cash portion of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, we completed a public offering of shares of our common stock, a public offering of convertible senior notes and a decreaseprivate offering of senior notes in net-back realizations,September 2016. See Note 8, Long-Term Debt, and Note 12, Common Stock, for further information. Prior to the September 2016 issuances of common stock, convertible senior notes and senior notes, we experiencedentered into a triggering event thatcommitment letter with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), for short-term bridge financing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition. The commitment letter contemplated, among other things, (i) a senior unsecured bridge loan to us in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $600 million, to be drawn, if at all, at the closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, (ii) a $250 million increase in the commitments under our existing revolving credit facility and (iii) certain related proposed amendments and waivers to our existing credit facility agreement. Upon issuance of the common stock, convertible senior notes and senior notes, the bridge loan commitment was terminated. Upon closing of
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

the Delaware Basin Acquisition, we will be required us to assess our crude oilpay approximately $9 million in fees related to the bridge loan commitment, approximately $6 million in fees related to the increase in commitments under the revolving credit facility and natural gas properties for possible impairment duringapproximately $10 million in other direct acquisition-related costs. During the third quarter of 2015. As a result of our assessment,three months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded an impairmentcharges for the bridge loan fees and the other direct acquisition-related costs. The $9 million charge of $150.3for fees related to the bridge loan commitment is included in interest expense and the $10 million to write-down our Utica Shale provedcharge for other direct acquisition-related costs is included in general and unproved properties. Of this impairment charge, $24.7 million was recorded to write-down certain capitalized well costsadministrative expenses. The liabilities associated with both amounts are included in other accrued expenses on our Utica Shale proved producing properties. This impairment charge represented the amount by which the carrying value of these crude oil and natural gas properties exceeded the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of approximately $27.9 million, excluding estimated salvage value, was determined based on estimated future discounted net cash flows, a Level 3 input, using estimated production and prices at which we reasonably expect the crude oil and natural gas will be sold. Additionally, as a result of the current outlook for future commodity prices, we recorded an impairment charge of $125.6 million to write-down all of our Utica Shale lease acquisition costs and pad development costs for pads not in production. These impairment charges were included in the condensed consolidated statementsbalance sheet as of operations line item impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties.September 30, 2016.

NOTE 67 - INCOME TAXES

We evaluate and update our estimated annual effective income tax rate on a quarterly basis based on current and forecasted operating results and tax laws. Consequently, based upon the mix and timing of our actual earnings compared to annual projections, our effective tax rate may vary quarterly and may make quarterly comparisons not meaningful. A tax expense or benefit unrelated to the current year income or loss is recognized in its entirety as a discrete item of tax in the period identified. The quarterly income tax provision is generally comprised of tax expense on income or benefit on loss at the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted for the effect of discrete items.

The effective tax rate for continuing operationsthe three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was a 34.0% and 37.1% benefit on loss compared to a 33.8% and 36.3% benefit on loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was a 33.8% and 36.3% benefit on loss, respectively, compared to a 39.6% and 40.5% provision on income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

2015. The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 include discrete tax expense of $0.3 million. This discrete tax expense arose based upon the final actual 2014 tax return expense differing from the previous year’s estimated tax provision amount and the loss of a state deferred tax asset due to ceasing operations within that state. The effective rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 would have been 34.2% and 36.5%, respectively, without the inclusion of discrete items. This effective rate2016 is based upon a full year forecasted tax benefit on loss and is greater than the statutory federal tax rate, primarily due to state taxes, percentage depletion and domestic production deduction, partially offset by nondeductible expenses that consist primarily of officers'officers’ compensation and governmentnondeductible lobbying expenses.

The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 include discrete tax expense of $0.6 million. This discrete tax expense arose based upon the final actual 2013 tax return expense differing from the previous year’s estimated tax provision amount. The effective rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 would have been 38.8% and 38.9%, respectively, without the inclusion of discrete items. This effective tax rate is based upon a full year forecasted tax provision on income and is greater than2015 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to state taxes and nondeductible officers' compensation,percentage depletion, partially offset by percentage depletionnondeductible officers' compensation. There were no significant discrete tax items recorded during the three and domestic production deduction.nine months ended September 30, 2016 or September 30, 2015.

As of September 30, 2015, we had2016, there is no liability for unrecognized tax benefits. As of the date of this report, we are current with our income tax filings in all applicable state jurisdictions and are not currently under any state income tax examinations. We continue voluntary participationto voluntarily participate in the Internal Revenue Service’sService's ("IRS") Compliance Assurance Program ("CAP") for the 2015 and 2016 tax years. With respect to the 2014 tax year, we have agreed to a post filing adjustment with the IRS which resulted in an immaterial tax payment for the 2014 andtax year. The IRS has fully accepted the 2014 federal return, as adjusted. The IRS has partially accepted our recently filed 2015 tax years. We have received a partial acceptance “no change” notice fromreturn that is now going through the IRS for our filed 2014 federal tax return and expect to receive a full acceptance notice after the IRS’s post filingCAP post-filing review is completed.process.


11

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

NOTE 78 - LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consistsconsisted of the following:following as of:

September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Senior notes:      
1.125% Convertible senior notes due 2021:   
Principal amount$200,000
 $
Unamortized discount(39,199) 
Unamortized debt issuance costs(4,793) 
1.125% Convertible senior notes due 2021, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs156,008
 
   
6.125% Senior notes due 2024:   
Principal amount400,000
 
Unamortized debt issuance costs(7,710) 
6.125% Senior notes due 2024, net of unamortized debt issuance costs392,290
 
   
7.75% Senior notes due 2022:   
Principal amount500,000
 500,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs(6,723) (7,563)
7.75% Senior notes due 2022, net of unamortized debt issuance costs493,277
 492,437
   
3.25% Convertible senior notes due 2016:      
Principal amount$115,000
 $115,000

 115,000
Unamortized discount(2,937) (6,077)
 (1,852)
3.25% Convertible senior notes due 2016, net of discount112,063
 108,923
7.75% Senior notes due 2022500,000
 500,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs
 (208)
3.25% Convertible senior notes due 2016, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs
 112,940
Total senior notes612,063
 608,923
1,041,575
 605,377
      
Revolving credit facility50,000
 56,000

 37,000
Total debt662,063
 664,923
Total debt, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs1,041,575
 642,377
Less current portion of long-term debt112,063
 

 112,940
Long-term debt$550,000
 $664,923
$1,041,575
 $529,437
    
Senior Notes

3.25%1.125% Convertible Senior Notes Due 20162021. . In November 2010,September 2016, we issued $115$200 million aggregate principal amount 3.25%of 1.125% convertible senior notes due May 15, 20162021 (the "Convertible"2021 Convertible Notes") in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers.public offering. The 2021 Convertible Notes are governed by an indenture dated September 14, 2016 between us and the U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The maturity for the payment of principal is September 15, 2021. Interest at the rate of 1.125% per year is payable semi-annuallyin cash semiannually in arrears on each MayMarch 15 and November 15.September 15, commencing on March 15, 2017. The indenture governing the2021 Convertible Notes contains certain non-financial covenants. We allocatedare senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the gross proceeds2021 Convertible Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to all of our secured indebtedness to the Convertible Notes between the liability and equity componentsextent of the debt. The initial $94.3 million liability component was determined based upon the fair value of similar debt instruments with similar terms, excluding the conversion feature, and priced on the same day we issued the Convertible Notes. The original issue discount and capitalized debt issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the Convertible Notes using an effective interest rate of 7.4%. As the stated maturity for payment of principal is May 2016, we have included the carrying value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our non-guarantor subsidiaries. The proceeds from the issuance of the 2021 Convertible Notes, net of discount, in the currentafter deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts, are expected to be used to fund a portion of long-term debt on our condensed consolidated balance sheet asthe purchase price of the Delaware Basin Acquisition (see Note 6, Pending Acquisition), to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes.
The 2021 Convertible Notes are convertible prior to March 15, 2021 only upon specified events and during specified periods and, thereafter, at any time, in each case at an initial conversion rate of 11.7113 per $1,000 principal amount of the 2021 Convertible Notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $85.39 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon certain events. Upon
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2015.2016
(unaudited)

Upon conversion, the 2021 Convertible Notes may be settled, at our election, in shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. Per the terms of the Convertible Notes, weWe have currentlyinitially elected the net-settlementa combination settlement method to satisfy our conversion obligation, which allows us to settle the principal amount of the 2021 Convertible Notes in cash and to settle the excess conversion value, if any, in shares, as well as cash in lieu of fractional shares. The
We may not redeem the 2021 Convertible Notes were not convertibleprior to their maturity date. If we undergo a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture for the 2021 Convertible Notes, subject to certain conditions, holders of the 2021 Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase all or part of the 2021 Convertible Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the optionprincipal amount of holdersthe 2021 Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. The occurrence of a fundamental change will also result in the 2021 Convertible Notes becoming convertible.
We allocated the gross proceeds of the 2021 Convertible Notes between the liability and equity components of the debt. The initial $160.5 million million liability component was determined based on the fair value of similar debt instruments excluding the conversion feature for similar terms and priced on the same day we issued the 2021 Convertible Notes. The initial $39.5 million equity component represents the debt discount and was calculated as the difference between the fair value of the debt and the gross proceeds of the 2021 Convertible Notes. Approximately $4.8 million in costs associated with the issuance of the 2021 Convertible Notes have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the notes using the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2015. Notwithstanding2016, the inabilityunamortized debt discount will be amortized over the remaining contractual term to convert,maturity of the 2021 Convertible Notes using an effective interest rate of 5.8%. Based upon a September 30, 2016 stock price of $67.06 per share, the “if-converted” value of the 2021 Convertible Notes asdid not exceed the principal amount.

6.125% Senior Notes Due 2024. In September 2016, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due September 30, 2015 exceeded15, 2024 (the “2024 Senior Notes”) in a private placement. The proceeds from the issuance of the 2024 Senior Notes, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts, are expected to be used to fund a portion of the purchase price of the Delaware Basin Acquisition (see Note 6, Pending Acquisition), to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. If the acquisition is not completed on or prior to December 31, 2016 (or in some circumstances by or on January 15, 2017), the 2024 Senior Notes will be redeemed in whole at a special mandatory redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2024 notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The 2024 Senior Notes accrue interest from the date of issuance and interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing on March 15, 2017. Approximately $7.8 million in costs associated with the issuance of the 2024 Senior Notes have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the notes using the effective interest method. The 2024 Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the notes; equal in right of payment to all our existing and future indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to all of our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by approximately $28.8 million.our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

In connection with the issuance of the 2024 Senior Notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers in which we agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC relating to an offer to exchange the 2024 Senior Notes for registered notes with substantially identical terms. In addition, we have agreed, in certain circumstances, to file a shelf registration statement covering the resale of the 2024 Senior Notes by holders.

At any time prior to September 15, 2019, we may redeem up to 35% of the outstanding 2024 Senior Notes with proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 106.125% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Senior Notes remains outstanding after each such redemption and the redemption occurs within 180 days after the closing of the equity offering.
Upon the occurrence of a "change of control," as defined in the indenture for the 2024 Senior Notes, holders will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes repurchased, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. In connection with certain asset sales, we may, under certain circumstances, be required to use the net cash proceeds of such asset sale to make an offer to purchase the notes at 100% of the principal amount, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

The indenture governing the 2024 Senior Notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends or make distributions on our stock; purchase or redeem stock or subordinated indebtedness; make investments; create certain liens; enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments by restricted subsidiaries to us; enter into transactions with affiliates; sell assets; consolidate or merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially of our assets; and create unrestricted subsidiaries.

7.75% Senior Notes Due 2022. In October 2012,, we issued $500$500 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% senior notes due October 15, 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”) in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers. Interest on theplacement. The 2022 Senior Notes accrue interest from the date of issuance and interest
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

is payable semi-annually in arrears on each April 15 and October 15.15. The indenture governing the 2022 Senior Notes contains customary restrictive incurrence covenants.covenants, and customary repurchase and redemption provisions, generally similar to those in the indenture governing the 2024 Senior Notes. Capitalized debt issuance costs are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the 2022 Senior Notes using the effective interest method.

3.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2016. In November 2010, we issued $115 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2016 (the "2016 Convertible Notes") in a private placement. The maturity for the payment of principal was May 15, 2016. At December 31, 2015, our indebtedness included the 2016 Convertible Notes. Upon settlement in May 2016, we paid the aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Convertible Notes, plus cash for fractional shares, totaling approximately 115 million, utilizing proceeds from our March 2016 equity offering. Additionally, we issued 792,406 shares of common stock for the $47.9 million excess conversion value. See Note 12, Common Stock, for more information.

As of September 30, 2015,2016, we were in compliance with all covenants related to the 2021 Convertible Notes, 2024 Senior Notes and the 2022 Senior Notes and expect to remain in compliance throughout the next 12-month period.

Credit Facility

Revolving Credit FacilityFacility.. In September 2015, we entered into We are party to a Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and other lenders party thereto. This agreement amends and restatesthereto (sometimes referred to as the "revolving credit agreement dated November 2010 and extends the maturity of thefacility"). The revolving credit facility tomatures in May 2020. The revolving credit facility2020 and is available for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. The revolving credit facility provides for a maximum of $1 billion in allowable borrowing capacity, subject to the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2015, the fall 2015 semi-annual redetermination resulted in the reaffirmation of our borrowing base, atwhich is currently $700 million; however, we have elected to maintainmillion, and the aggregate commitment atcommitments, which are currently $450 million. The borrowing base is based on, among other things, the loan value assigned to the proved reserves attributable to our crude oil and natural gas interests, excluding proved reserves attributable to our affiliated partnerships. The borrowing base is subject to a semi-annual size redetermination based upon quantification of our reserves at June 30 and December 31, and is also subject to a redetermination upon the occurrence of certain events. The revolving credit facility is secured by a pledge of the stock of certainsubstantially all of our subsidiaries,assets, including mortgages of certain producing crude oil and natural gas properties and substantially all of our and such subsidiaries' other assets.properties. Our affiliated partnerships are not guarantors of our obligations under the revolving credit facility.

12

PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued


the Delaware Basin Acquisition (see Note 6,
Pending Acquisition) and, effective upon closing of the acquisition, adjusts the interest rate payable on amounts borrowed under the facility and increases the aggregate commitments under the facility from $450 million to $700 million (with the borrowing base remaining at $700 million).
In October 2016, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The amendment, among other things, reaffirmed of our borrowing base at $700 million and made certain other immaterial modifications to the existing agreement, including an increase in the amount of our future production that we are permitted to hedge.
We had $50.0 millionno outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2015,2016, compared to $56.0$37 million outstanding as of December 31, 2014.2015. The weighted-average interest rate on the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility, exclusive of fees on the unused commitment and the letter of credit noted below, was 2.7% and 4.1%2.6% per annum as of December 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

As of September 30, 2015,2016, RNG had an irrevocable standby letter of credit of approximately $11.7$11.7 million in favor of a third-party transportation service provider to secure firm transportation of the natural gas produced by third-party producers for whom we market production in the Appalachian Basin. The letter of credit is currently expiresscheduled to expire in September 2016 and2017 but is expected to be automatically extended annually in accordance with the letter of credit's terms and conditions. The letter of credit reduces the amount of available funds under our revolving credit facility by an amount equal to the letter of credit. As of September 30, 2015,2016, the available funds under our revolving credit facility, including the reduction for the $11.7 million letter of credit, was $388.3$438.3 million.

The revolving credit facility contains covenants customary for agreements of this type, with the most restrictive being certain financial tests on a quarterly basis. The financial tests, as defined per the revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2016, include requirements to: (a) maintain a minimum current ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 and (b) not exceed a maximum leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00. As of September 30, 2015,2016, we were in compliance with all of the revolving credit facility covenants and expect to remain in compliance throughout the next 12-month period. Effective upon closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, the maximum permitted leverage ratio will be reduced to 4.00 to 1.00.
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

NOTE 89 - CAPITAL LEASES

Beginning in the first quarter of 2015, we enteredWe periodically enter into non-cancelable lease agreements for vehicles utilized by our operations and field personnel. Each lease agreement has a term of three years and isThese leases are being accounted for as a capital lease,leases, as the present value of minimum monthly lease payments, including the residual value guarantee, exceeds 90% of the fair value of the leased vehicles at inception of the lease.
 
The following table presents leased vehicles under capital leases as of September 30, 2015:2016:
 

 Amount Amount
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
Vehicles $1,479
 $2,801
Accumulated depreciation (121) (613)
 $1,358
 $2,188
 
Future minimum lease payments by year and in the aggregate, under non-cancelable capital leases with terms of one year or more, consist of the following:
 
For the Twelve Months Ending September 30, Amount Amount
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
2016 $447
2017 454
 $860
2018 743
 1,167
2019 553
 1,644
 2,580
Less executory cost (72) (101)
Less amount representing interest (215) (280)
Present value of minimum lease payments $1,357
 $2,199
  
  
Short-term capital lease obligations $315
 $646
Long-term capital lease obligations 1,042
 1,553
 $1,357
 $2,199

Short-term capital lease obligations are included in other accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Long-term capital lease obligations are included in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


13

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

NOTE 910 - ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The following table presents the changes in carrying amounts of the asset retirement obligations associated with our working interests in crude oil and natural gas properties:
AmountAmount
(in thousands)(in thousands)
  
Balance at beginning of period, January 1, 2015$73,855
Balance at beginning of period, January 1, 2016$89,492
Obligations incurred with development activities1,642
1,137
Accretion expense4,742
5,400
Obligations discharged with asset retirements(3,163)
Balance end of period, September 30, 201577,076
Obligations discharged with disposal of properties and asset retirements(6,620)
Balance end of period, September 30, 201689,409
Less current portion(5,460)(6,900)
Long-term portion$71,616
$82,509
  

Our estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on historical experience in plugging and abandoning wells, estimated economic lives and estimated plugging and abandonment cost considering federal and state regulatory requirements in effect. The liability is discounted using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised. In 2016, the credit-adjusted risk-free
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

rates used to discount our plugging and abandonment liabilities ranged from 7.6% to 8.0%. In periods subsequent to initial measurement of the liability, we must recognize period-to-period changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time, revisions to either the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows or changes in inflation factors and changes to our credit-adjusted risk-free rate as market conditions warrant. Short-term asset retirement obligations are included in other accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 1011 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Firm Transportation, Processing and Sales Agreements. We enter into contracts that provide firm transportation, sales and processing agreements on pipeline systems through which we transport or sell crude oil and natural gas. Satisfaction of the volume requirements includes volumes produced by us, purchased from third parties and produced by our affiliated partnerships and other third-party working interest owners. We record in our financial statements only our share of costs based upon our working interest in the wells. These contracts require us to pay these transportation and processing charges whether or not the required volumes are delivered. As commoditynatural gas prices continue to remain depressed, certain customersthird-party producers under our Gas Marketing segment have begun and will continue to experience financial distress, which has led to certain contractual defaults. Todefaults and litigation; however, to date, we have had no material counterparty default losses. As of September 30, 2016, we have recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $1.1 million. We have initiated several legal actions for breach of contract, collection, and related claims against certain third-party producers that are delinquent in their payment obligations, which have to date resulted in one default judgment.

The following table presents gross volume information related to our long-term firm transportation, sales and processing agreements for pipeline capacity:
 For the Twelve Months Ending September 30,    For the Twelve Months Ending September 30,   
Area 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 and
Through
Expiration
 Total Expiration
Date
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 and
Through
Expiration
 Total Expiration
Date
                            
Natural gas (MMcf)                          
Appalachian Basin 7,136
 7,117
 7,117
 7,117
 20,480
 48,967
 August 31, 2022
Gas Marketing segment 7,117
 7,117
 7,117
 7,136
 13,344
 41,831
 August 31, 2022
Utica Shale 2,745
 2,738
 2,737
 2,738
 10,500
 21,458
 July 22, 2023 2,738
 2,738
 2,738
 2,745
 7,754
 18,713
 July 22, 2023
Total 9,881
 9,855
 9,854
 9,855
 30,980
 70,425
  9,855
 9,855
 9,855
 9,881
 21,098
 60,544
 
                          
Crude oil (MBbls)                          
Wattenberg Field 2,420
 2,413
 2,413
 2,413
 1,813
 11,472
 June 30, 2020 2,413
 2,413
 2,413
 1,813
 
 9,052
 June 30, 2020
                          
Dollar commitment (in thousands) $17,623
 $17,473
 $16,326
 $16,326
 $21,312
 $89,060
  $17,470
 $16,324
 $16,324
 $13,205
 $8,102
 $71,425
 

Litigation. The Company isWe are involved in various legal proceedings that it considerswe consider normal to itsour business. The Company reviewsWe review the status of these proceedings on an ongoing basis and, from time to time, may settle or otherwise resolve these matters on terms and conditions that management believes are in theour best interests of the Company.interests. There is no assurance that settlements can be reached on acceptable terms or that adverse judgments, if any, in the remaining litigation will not exceed the amounts reserved. Although the results cannot be known with certainty, we currently believe that the ultimate results of such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Class Action Regarding 2010A group of 42 independent West Virginia natural gas producers has filed a lawsuit in Marshall County, West Virginia, naming Dominion Transmission, Inc. (“Dominion”), certain entities affiliated with Dominion, and 2011 Partnership Purchases

In December 2011,RNG as defendants, alleging various contractual, fiduciary and related claims against the Companydefendants, all of which are associated with firm transportation contracts entered into by plaintiffs and relating to pipelines owned and operated by Dominion and its wholly-owned merger subsidiary were served with an alleged class action on behalf of unit holders of 12 former limited partnerships, relatedaffiliates. RNG and Dominion have removed the case to its repurchase of the 12 partnerships, which were formed beginning in late 2002 through 2005. The mergers were completed in 2010 and 2011. The action was filed in U.S. District Court for the CentralNorthern District of CaliforniaWest Virginia and was titled Schulein v. Petroleum Development Corp. Theare preparing pre-trial pleadings, including an answer to the complaint primarily alleged thatand a motion to dismiss the disclosures in the proxy statements issued in connectioncase. At this time, RNG is unable to estimate any potential damages associated with the mergers were inadequate,claims, but believes the complaint is without merit and a state law breach of fiduciary duty. In January 2014, the plaintiffs were certified as a class by the court.

14

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued


In October 2014, the Company and plaintiffs’ counsel reached a settlement agreement. That settlement agreement was signed in December 2014 and was given final court approval in March 2015. Under this settlement agreement, the plaintiffs received a cash payment of $37.5 million in January 2015, of which the Company paid $31.5 million and insurers paid $6 million. In March 2015, the class action was dismissed with prejudice and all class claims were released. As of December 31, 2014, the Company accrued a liability of $37.5 million relatedintends to this litigation, which was included in other accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.vigorously pursue its defenses.

Environmental. Due to the nature of the natural gas and oil industry, we are exposed to environmental risks. We have various policies and procedures to minimize and mitigate the risks from environmental contamination. We conduct periodicregular reviews to identify changes in our environmental risk profile. Liabilities are recorded when environmental damages resulting from past events that require remediation are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. As of September 30, 20152016 and December 31, 2014,2015, we had accrued environmental liabilities in the amount of $4.4$3.2 million and $0.8$4.1 million, respectively, included in other accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.We are not aware of any environmental claims existing as of September 30, 20152016 which have not been provided for or would otherwise have a material impact on our financial statements; however, there can be no assurance that current regulatory requirements will not change or that unknown past non-compliance with environmental laws will not be discovered on our properties.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

In August 2015, we received a Clean Air Act Section 114 Information Request (the "Information Request") from the United StatesU.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"). The Information Request seeks,sought, among other things, information related to the design, operation, and maintenance of our production facilities in the DJDenver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado. The Information Request focuses primarilyfocused on historical operation and design information for 46 of our production facilities and asks that we conduct certain sampling and analyses at the identified 46 facilities. We are currently scheduled to respondresponded to the Information Request in January 2016. We continue to meet with the EPA and provide additional information, but cannot predict the outcome of this matter at this time.

In 2014,addition, in December 2015, we experiencedreceived a lossCompliance Advisory pursuant to C.R.S. § 25-7-115(2) from the Colorado Department of well control while drilling an oilPublic Health and gas well in Morgan County, Ohio. The event resulted in a releaseEnvironment's Air Quality Control Commission's Air Pollution Control Division alleging that we failed to design, operate, and maintain certain condensate collection, storage, processing and handling operations to minimize leakage of well fluids, including oil based drilling mud.volatile organic compounds to the maximum extent possible at 65 facilities consistent with applicable standards under Colorado law. We have completedare working with the appropriate remediationagency to address the release. In August 2015,allegations, but cannot predict the EPA issued us a Noticeoutcome of Intent seeking civil penalties. We and the EPA recently agreed in principle to settle this matter for a civil fine of approximately $152,000, although settlement is subject to the parties entering into a definitive settlement agreement.at this time.

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers. Each of our senior executive officers may be entitled to a severance payment and certain other benefits upon the termination of the officer's employment pursuant to the officer's employment agreement and/or the Company's executive severance compensation plan. The nature and amount of such benefits would vary based upon, among other things, whether the termination followed a change of control of the Company.

NOTE 1112 - COMMON STOCK

Sale of Equity Securities

In September 2016, we completed a public offering of 9,085,000 shares of our common stock at a price to us of $61.51 per share. Net proceeds of the offering were $558.5 million, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts, of which $90,850 is included in common shares-par value and $558.4 million is included in additional paid-in capital ("APIC") on the September 30, 2016 condensed consolidated balance sheet. The shares were issued pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC in March 2015.

In March 2016, we completed a public offering of 5,922,500 shares of our common stock at a price to us of $50.11 per share. Net proceeds of the offering were $296.6 million, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts, of which $59,225 is included in common shares-par value and $296.5 million is included in APIC on the September 30, 2016 condensed consolidated balance sheet. The shares were issued pursuant to the effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC in March 2015.

In March 2015, we completed a public offering of 4,002,000 shares of our common stock par value $0.01 per share, at a price to us of $50.73 per share. Net proceeds of the offering were $202.9 million, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts, of which $40,020 is included in common shares-par value and $202.8 million is included in additional paid-in capitalAPIC on the September 30, 2015 condensed consolidated balance sheet.sheets. The shares were issued pursuant to anthe effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC in March 2015.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The following table provides a summary of the impact of our outstanding stock-based compensation plans on the results of operations for the periods presented:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands) (in thousands)
                
Stock-based compensation expense $4,813
 $4,232
 $14,278
 $13,111
 $4,079
 $4,813
 $15,205
 $14,278
Income tax benefit (1,828) (1,482) (5,423) (4,856) (1,552) (1,828) (5,786) (5,423)
Net stock-based compensation expense $2,985
 $2,750
 $8,855
 $8,255
 $2,527
 $2,985
 $9,419
 $8,855
                

Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs")

The SARs vest ratably over a three-year period and may be exercised at any point after vesting through ten years from the date of issuance. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, upon exercise, the executive officers will receive, in shares of common stock, the excess of the market price of the award on the date of exercise over the market price of the award on the date of issuance.


15

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

In January 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee awarded 68,27458,709 SARs to our executive officers. The fair value of each SAR award was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions:

Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 20142016 2015
      
Expected term of award6 years
 6 years
6.0 years
 5.2 years
Risk-free interest rate1.6% 2.1%1.8% 1.4%
Expected volatility59.4% 65.6%54.5% 58.0%
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$21.99
 $29.96
$26.96
 $22.23

The expected term of the award was estimated using historical stock option exercise behavior data. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yields approximating the expected life of the award in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatilities were based on our historical volatility. We do not expect to pay or declare dividends in the foreseeable future.
    
The following table presents the changes in our SARs for theall periods presented:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 20142016 2015
Number of
SARs
 Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
 Average Remaining Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
 Number of
SARs
 Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
 
Average Remaining Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
Number of
SARs
 Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
 Average Remaining Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
 Number of
SARs
 Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
 
Average Remaining Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding beginning of year, January 1,279,011
 $38.77
     190,763
 $33.77
    326,453
 $38.99
     279,011
 $38.77
    
Awarded68,274
 39.63
   88,248
 49.57
  58,709
 51.63
   68,274
 39.63
  
Exercised(141,084) 40.16
 $2,770
 
 
  
Outstanding at September 30,347,285
 38.94
 7.5 $4,888
 279,011
 38.77
 8.0 $3,215
244,078
 41.36
 7.1 6,273
 347,285
 38.94
 7.5 $4,888
Vested and expected to vest at September 30,341,423
 38.89
 7.5 4,821
 270,589
 38.56
 8.0 3,173
238,671
 41.20
 7.1 6,171
 341,423
 38.89
 7.5 4,821
Exercisable at September 30,191,149
 35.68
 6.6 3,312
 109,920
 32.71
 7.1 1,933
136,644
 36.74
 5.9 4,143
 191,149
 35.68
 6.6 3,312

Total compensation cost related to SARs granted, net of estimated forfeitures, and not yet recognized in our condensed consolidated statement of operations as of September 30, 20152016 was $2.4$1.7 million. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.71.9 years.
    
Restricted Stock Awards

Time-Based Awards.The fair value of the time-based restricted shares is amortized ratably over the requisite service period, primarily three years. The time-based shares generally vest ratably on each anniversary following the grant date provided that a participant is continuously employed.

In January 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee awarded to our executive officers a total of 80,70761,634 time-based restricted shares that vest ratably over a three-year period ending in January 2018.2019.

The following table presents the changes in non-vested time-based awards to all employees, including executive officers, for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016:
Shares Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
      
Non-vested at December 31, 2014564,332
 $46.02
Non-vested at December 31, 2015525,081
 $50.23
Granted295,694
 48.58
269,709
 57.12
Vested(258,555) 40.36
(256,976) 48.60
Forfeited(17,457) 54.51
(14,716) 55.70
Non-vested at September 30, 2015584,014
 49.56
Non-vested at September 30, 2016523,098
 54.43
      


16

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

The following table presents the weighted-average grant date fair value per share and related information as of/for the periods presented:

As of/for the Nine Months Ended September 30,

As of/for the Nine Months Ended September 30,

2015 20142016 2015
(in thousands, except per share data)(in thousands, except per share data)
      
Total intrinsic value of time-based awards vested$13,061
 $15,840
$14,675
 $13,061
Total intrinsic value of time-based awards non-vested30,959
 31,996
35,079
 30,959
Market price per common share as of September 30,53.01
 50.29
67.06
 53.01
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share48.58
 56.64
57.12
 48.58

Total compensation cost related to non-vested time-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, and not yet recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as of September 30, 20152016 was $19.2$18.7 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.

Market-Based Awards.The fair value of the market-based restricted shares is amortized ratably over the requisite service period, primarily three years. The market-based shares vest if the participant is continuously employed throughout the performance period and the market-based performance measure is achieved, with a maximum vesting period of three years. All compensation cost related to the market-based awards will be recognized if the requisite service period is fulfilled, even if the market condition is not achieved.
In January 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee awarded a total of 29,39824,280 market-basedrestricted shares to our executive officers. In addition to continuous employment, the vesting of these shares is contingent on the Company's total shareholder return ("TSR"), which is essentially the Company’s stock price change including any dividends, as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies. The shares are measured over a three-year period ending on December 31, 20172018 and can result in a payout between 0% and 200% of the total shares awarded. The weighted-average grant date fair value per market-based share for these awards granted was computed using the Monte Carlo pricing model using the following assumptions:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 20142016 2015
      
Expected term of award3 years
 3 years
3 years
 3 years
Risk-free interest rate0.9% 0.8%1.2% 0.9%
Expected volatility53.0% 55.2%52.3% 53.0%
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$57.35
 $56.87
$72.54
 $66.16

The expected term of the awards was based on the requisite service period. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant and extrapolated to approximate the life of the award. The expected volatility was based on our historical volatility.
    
The following table presents the change in non-vested market-based awards during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016:

  Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value per Share
     
Non-vested at December 31, 2014
 83,721
 $52.98
Granted
 29,398
 57.35
Non-vested at September 30, 2015
 113,119
 54.12
     
  Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value per Share
     
Non-vested at December 31, 2015
 71,549
 $63.60
Granted
 24,280
 72.54
Vested (1)
 (11,283) 98.50
Non-vested at September 30, 2016
 84,546
 61.51
     
__________
(1)Vested shares were issued at 200% based on our relative total shareholder return as ranked among the Company's peer group.


17

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)

The following table presents the weighted-average grant date fair value per share and related information as of/for the periods presented:

As of/for the Nine Months Ended September 30,As of/for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 20142016 2015
(in thousands, except per share data)(in thousands, except per share data)
      
Total intrinsic value of market-based awards vested$1,174
 $
Total intrinsic value of market-based awards non-vested$5,996
 $5,746
5,670
 5,996
Market price per common share as of September 30,53.01
 50.29
67.06
 53.01
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share57.35
 56.87
72.54
 66.16

Total compensation cost related to non-vested market-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, and not yet recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as of September 30, 20152016 was $2.4$1.9 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.71.9 years.

NOTE 1213 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is similarly computed, except that the denominator includes the effect, using the treasury stock method, of unvested restricted stock, outstanding SARs, stock options, Convertible Notesconvertible notes and shares held pursuant to our non-employee director deferred compensation plan, if including such potential shares of common stock is dilutive.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the weighted-average diluted shares outstanding:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
 (in thousands)
        
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic40,085
 35,834
 38,837
 35,763
Dilutive effect of:       
Restricted stock
 259
 
 287
SARs
 56
 
 45
Stock options
 1
 
 1
Non-employee director deferred compensation
 6
 
 5
Convertible notes
 672
 
 730
Weighted-average common shares and equivalents outstanding - diluted40,085
 36,828
 38,837
 36,831
        
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
        
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic48,839
 40,085
 45,741
 38,837
Weighted-average common shares and equivalents outstanding - diluted48,839
 40,085
 45,741
 38,837
        

We reported a net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result, our basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding were the same because the effect of the common share equivalents was anti-dilutive.

The following table presents the weighted-average common share equivalents excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 2014 2015 20142016 2015 2016 2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
              
Weighted-average common share equivalents excluded from diluted earnings              
per share due to their anti-dilutive effect:              
Restricted stock816
 4
 836
 
660
 816
 705
 836
SARs83
 11
 87
 30
Stock options4
 
 4
 
Non-employee director deferred compensation8
 
 6
 
Convertible notes468
 
 505
 

 468
 345
 505
Other equity-based awards97
 95
 103
 97
Total anti-dilutive common share equivalents1,379
 15
 1,438
 30
757
 1,379
 1,153
 1,438
              

18In September 2016, we issued the 2021 Convertible Notes, which give the holders the right to convert the aggregate principal amount into 2.3 million shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $85.39 per share. The 2021 Convertible Notes could be included in the diluted earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method if the average market share price exceeds the $85.39 conversion price during the periods presented.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



In November 2010, we issued ourthe 2016 Convertible Notes, which givegave the holders the right to convert the aggregate principal amount into 2.7 million shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $42.40 per share. The 2016 Convertible Notes could bematured in May 2016. See Note 8, Long-Term Debt, for additional information. Prior to maturity, the 2016 Convertible Notes were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method if the average market share price exceedsexceeded the $42.40 conversion price during the period presented.

Shares issuable upon conversion of the 2021 Convertible Notes and 2016 Convertible Notes were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015applicable periods as the effect would be anti-dilutive to our earnings per share. Shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as the average market price during the period exceeded the conversion price.

NOTE 13 - ASSETS HELD FOR SALE, DIVESTITURES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In October 2014, we completed the sale of our entire 50% ownership interest in PDCM to an unrelated third-party for aggregate consideration, after our share of PDCM's debt repayment and other working capital adjustments, of approximately $192 million, comprised of approximately $153 million in net cash proceeds and a promissory note due in 2020 of approximately $39 million. The transaction included the buyer's assumption of our share of the firm transportation commitment related to the assets owned by PDCM, as well as our share of PDCM's natural gas hedging positions for the years 2014 through 2017. The divestiture resulted in a pre-tax gain of $76.3 million. Proceeds from the divestiture were used to reduce outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility and to fund a portion of our 2014 capital budget. The divestiture represented a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations, in that our organizational structure no longer has joint venture partners or dry gas assets. Therefore, our proportionate share of PDCM's Marcellus Shale results of operations have been separately reported as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.


19

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

The following table presents condensed consolidated statement of operations data related to discontinued operations:

Condensed consolidated statements of operations - discontinued operations Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

  (in thousands)
Revenues    
Crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales $5,411
 $24,149
Commodity price risk management income (loss), net 1,929
 (1,085)
Well operations, pipeline income and other 
 48
Total revenues 7,340
 23,112
     
Costs, expenses and other    
Production costs 1,020
 7,120
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties 273
 433
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,272
 9,128
Other 1,061
 3,445
Gain on sale of properties and equipment (1) (193)
Total costs, expenses and other 3,625
 19,933
     
Interest expense (709) (2,222)
Interest income 62
 194
Income from discontinued operations 3,068
 1,151
Provision for income taxes (3,148) (759)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $(80) $392
     

The following table presents supplemental cash flows information related to our 50% ownership interest in PDCM, which is classified as discontinued operations:

Supplemental cash flows information - discontinued operations Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
  (in thousands)
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Capital expenditures $(17,253)
   
Significant non-cash investing items:  
Change in accounts payable related to purchases of properties and equipment
 (5,727)

Assets held for sale of $2.9 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 represents the carrying value of approximately 12 acres of land located adjacent to our Bridgeport, West Virginia, regional headquarters.

NOTE 14 - BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We separate our operating activities into two segments: Oil and Gas Exploration and Production and Gas Marketing. All material inter-company accounts and transactions between segments have been eliminated.

Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. Our Oil and Gas Exploration and Production segment includes all of our crude oil and natural gas properties. The segment represents revenues and expenses from the production and sale of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. Segment revenue includes crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales, commodity price risk management, net and well operation and pipeline income. Segment income (loss) consists of segment revenue less production cost, exploration expense, impairment of crude oilproperties and natural gas properties,equipment, direct general and administrative expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense.

Gas Marketing. Our Gas Marketing segment purchases, aggregates and resells natural gas produced by us and others.unrelated third-parties. Segment income (loss) primarily represents sales from natural gas marketing and direct interest income, less costs of natural gas marketing and direct general and administrative expense.

Unallocated Amounts. Unallocated income includes unallocated other revenue, less corporate general and administrative expense, corporate DD&A expense, interest income and interest expense. Unallocated assets include assets utilized for corporate general and administrative purposes, as well as assets not specifically included in our two business segments.

20

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued

    
The following tables present our segment information:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 2014 2015 20142016 2015 2016 2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Segment revenues:              
Oil and gas exploration and production$228,520
 $211,259
 $418,356
 $385,867
$161,212
 $228,520
 $268,090
 $418,356
Gas marketing2,580
 13,297
 8,336
 62,649
2,678
 2,580
 6,728
 8,336
Total revenues$231,100
 $224,556
 $426,692
 $448,516
$163,890
 $231,100
 $274,818
 $426,692
              
Segment income (loss) before income taxes:              
Oil and gas exploration and production$(32,046) $136,886
 $(20,309) $174,612
$17,809
 $(30,296) $(134,731) $(14,134)
Gas marketing(201) (51) (539) 3
(414) (201) (1,067) (539)
Unallocated(30,414) (47,362) (91,014) (135,472)(52,736) (32,164) (166,689) (97,189)
Income (loss) before income taxes$(62,661) $89,473
 $(111,862) $39,143
Loss before income taxes$(35,341) $(62,661) $(302,487) $(111,862)
              

September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Segment assets:      
Oil and gas exploration and production$2,261,164
 $2,254,751
$3,390,005
 $2,294,288
Gas marketing4,266
 6,979
3,735
 4,217
Unallocated76,006
 75,984
23,540
 72,038
Assets held for sale2,874
 2,874
Total assets$2,344,310
 $2,340,588
$3,417,280
 $2,370,543
      

NOTE 15 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On October 26, 2015, we announced that Gysle Shellum, Chief Financial Officer, will retire effective June 30, 2016. He will remain the Chief Financial Officer until a successor is appointed and will thereafter assist with transitional and other assigned matters through his retirement date.


21

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis, as well as other sections in this report, should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Further, we encourage you to revisit the Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Financial Overview

Production volumes from continuing operations increased substantially to 4.36.0 MMboe and 10.615.8 MMboe for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, respectively, representing an increaseincreases of 84%39% and 58%49%, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The increase in production volumes was primarily attributable to our successful horizontal Niobrara and Codell drilling program in the Wattenberg Field and, to a lesser extent, the completion of two four-well pads in the Utica Shale in late 2014 and early 2015.Field. Crude oil production from continuing operations increased 87%17% and 53%27% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, while NGLs production from continuing operations increased 72% and 48%,2016, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods. Crude oil production comprised approximately 46%39% and 40% of total production from continuingin the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Our ratio of crude oil production to total production decreased as compared to 2015 as expected as we shifted our focus to the higher gas to oil ratio inner core area of the Wattenberg Field during the first half of 2016. We expect our ratio of crude oil to total production to increase by the end of 2016 as we move drilling operations during bothback toward the middle core area of the Wattenberg Field. Natural gas production increased 47% and 60% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Natural gasNGL production from continuing operations increased 86%80% and 69% during83% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods, dueperiods. Our inner core wells have shown stronger wet gas production than anticipated, which has contributed to our recent focus on developmental drillingthe growth of gas and NGL production. Our production for the three months ended September 30, 2016 increased approximately 0.8 MMboe, or 16%, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. We expect a modest increase in production for the gassier innerfourth quarter of 2016 as compared to the third quarter, as we have approximately 20 fewer wells scheduled to be turned-in-line during the fourth quarter, and we expect all remaining 2016 well completions to be concluded by the middle core areas of the Wattenberg Field.fourth quarter of 2016. For the month ended September 30, 2016, our average production rate was 63 MBoe per day, up from 47 MBoe per day for the month ended September 30, 2015.

Crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales, from continuing operations, coupled with the impact of settlement ofsettled derivatives, increased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Increased production and positive net settlements on derivative positions more than offset2016 relative to the effect of declines in commodity prices during the quarter. Lower crudesame prior year periods. Crude oil, and natural gas index prices during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were the primary reason for significant positive net settlements on derivative positions of $68.0NGLs sales increased to $141.8 million and $162.5 million, respectively, compared to negative net settlements of $4.5 million and $21.5$328 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Crude2016 compared to $104.5 million and $275.5 million in the same prior year periods due to 39% and 49% increases in production, respectively, offset in part by 2% and 20% decreases, respectively, in the realized price per barrel of crude oil equivalent ("Boe"). The realized prices per Boe were $23.62 and $20.80 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $24.15 and $26.02, respectively, for the same prior year periods. Positive net settlements on derivatives decreased to $47.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and increased to $167.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to positive net settlements on derivatives of $68 million and $162.5 million in the same prior year periods. As a result of these aggregate changes, crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales includingand the impact of net settlements onsettled derivatives weretotaled $189.5 million and $495.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $172.5 million and $438.0$438 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared to $116.0 millionrespectively. This represents increases of 10% and $350.1 million13% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. This represents increases2016, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods. The realized prices per Boe, including the impact of 49%net settlements on derivatives, were $31.56 and 25%, respectively, in$31.44 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, respectively, compared to $39.88 and $41.37 for the same prior year periods.periods, respectively.

SignificantAdditional significant changes impacting our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 20152016 include the following:

Crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales from continuing operations decreased to $104.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $120.5 million in the same prior year period, due to a 53% decrease in the weighted-average realized prices of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs, offset in part by an 84% increase in production;
Positive net settlements on derivatives increased to $68.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to negative net settlements on derivatives of $4.5 million in the same prior year period, due to lower crude oil and natural gas index settlement prices;
PositiveNegative net change in the fair value of unsettled derivative positions during the three months ended September 30, 20152016 was $55.5$28.3 million compared to a positive net change in the fair value of unsettled derivative positions of $94.7$55.5 million during the same prior year period,period. The decrease in fair value of unsettled derivative positions was primarily attributable to the downwarda less significant upward shift in the crude oil and natural gas forward curve that occurredcurves, offset by the impact of the beginning of period fair value of derivative instruments settled in both periods;the respective periods, during the current quarter as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015;
General
Impairment of properties and administrative expenseequipment decreased to $18.5$0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $34.6 million in the same prior year period, primarily attributable to $16.2 million recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2014 in connection with certain partnership-related class action litigation and estimates relating to litigation arising from bankruptcy proceedings of certain affiliated partnerships;
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties increased to $153.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.9$154 million in the same prior year period, primarily related to the $150.3 million write-down of our Utica Shale producing and non-producing crude oil and natural gas properties to their estimated fair value;value in the three months ended September 30, 2015;
General and administrative expense increased to $32.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $20.3 million in the same prior year period, primarily due to $11.3 million of fees and expenses related to the pending Delaware Basin Acquisition;
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $80.9$112.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $49.6$80.9 million in the same prior year period, primarily due to increased production, offsetproduction; and
Interest expense increased to $20.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $12.1 million in part by lower weighted-average depreciation, depletion and amortization rates.the same prior year period, primarily attributable to a $9 million charge for the bridge loan commitment related to the Delaware Basin Acquisition.

Significant
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Additional significant changes impacting our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 include the following:

Crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales from continuing operations decreased to $275.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $371.6 million in the same prior year period, due to a 53% decrease in the weighted-average realized prices of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs, offset in part by a 58% increase in production;
Positive net settlements on derivatives increased to $162.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to negative net settlements on derivatives of $21.5 million in the same prior year period, due to lower crude oil and natural gas index settlement prices;
Negative net change in the fair value of unsettled derivative positions during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 was $21.3$230.2 million compared to a positivenegative net change in the fair value of unsettled derivative positions of $34.2$21.3 million during the

22

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

same prior year period,period. The decrease in fair value of unsettled derivative positions was primarily attributable to an upward shift in the crude oil and natural gas derivativesforward curves that settledoccurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015;2016;
GeneralImpairment of properties and administrative expenseequipment decreased to $55.9$6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $96.5 million in the same prior year period, primarily attributable to $40.3 million recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 in connection with certain partnership-related class action litigation and estimates relating to litigation arising from bankruptcy proceedings of certain affiliated partnerships;
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties increased to $158.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $3.6$161.2 million in the same prior year period, primarily related to the $150.3 million write-down of our Utica Shale producing and non-producing crude oil and natural gas properties to their estimated fair value;value in the three months ended September 30, 2015;
General and administrative expense increased to $78.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $62.1 million in the same prior year period, primarily due to $11.3 million of fees and expenses related to the Delaware Basin Acquisition;
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $206.9$317.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $142.2$206.9 million in the same prior year period, primarily due to increased production offset in part by lowerand, to a lesser extent, a higher weighted-average depreciation, depletion and amortization rates.rate;

Due to a significant decline in commodity prices and a decrease in net-back realizations, we experienced a triggering event that required us to assess our crude oil and natural gas properties for possible impairment duringDuring the thirdfirst quarter of 2015.2016, we determined that collection of a third-party note receivable arising from the sale of our interest in properties in the Marcellus Shale was not reasonably assured based then current market conditions and new information made available to us. As a result, we recognized a provision and recorded an allowance for uncollectible notes receivable for the $44 million outstanding balance as of March 31, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, there has been no change to our assessment we recorded an impairment charge of $150.3 million to write-down our Utica Shale proved and unproved properties. Of this impairment charge, $24.7 million was recorded to write-down certain capitalized well costs on our Utica Shale proved producing properties. Additionally, as a result of the current outlookcollectibility of the note. See Note 3, Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Notes Receivable, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for future commodity prices, we recorded an impairment charge of $125.6additional information; and
Interest expense increased to $42.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to write-down all of our Utica Shale lease acquisition costs and pad development costs for pads not in production. We had no proved undeveloped reserves$35.4 million in the Utica Shale in our December 31, 2014 reserve report. Therefore, we do not believe that there will besame prior year period, primarily attributable to a material change in our estimated reserve quantities at December 31, 2015 as a result of these impairments.$9 million charge for the bridge loan commitment related to the Delaware Basin Acquisition.

DespiteIn March 2016, we completed a public offering of 5,922,500 shares of our common stock at a price to us of $50.11 per share. Net proceeds of the current commodityoffering were $296.6 million, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts. We used a portion of the net proceeds of the offering to repay all amounts then outstanding on our revolving credit facility and the principal amount owed upon the maturity of the Convertible Notes in May 2016 and retained the remainder for general corporate purposes.

The 2016 Convertible Notes matured in May 2016. We settled the 2016 Convertible Notes with a combination of cash and stock, paying the aggregate principal amount, plus cash for fractional shares, totaling approximately $115 million, utilizing proceeds from the offering. Additionally, we issued 792,406 shares of common stock for the excess conversion value.

In June 2016, we entered into definitive agreements with Noble to consolidate certain acreage positions in the core Wattenberg Field.
In September 2016, we closed the acreage exchange transaction. Pursuant to the transaction, we exchanged leasehold acreage and, to a lesser extent, interests in certain development wells. Upon closing, we received approximately 13,500 net acres in exchange for approximately 11,700 net acres, with no cash exchanged between the parties. The difference in net acres is primarily due to variances in leasehold net revenue interests and third-party mid-stream contracts. This acreage trade is expected to increase opportunities for longer horizontal laterals with significantly increased working interests, while minimizing potential surface impact.

Pending Delaware Basin Acquisition

We seek acquisition opportunities as part of our overall growth strategy, and in particular have recently engaged in the process of searching for, and evaluating, a large-scale acquisition in a new U.S. onshore basin capable of creating material long-term value-added growth, focusing on four key criteria: top-tier acreage in core geologic positions, significant drilling inventory with additional expansion through downspacing, portfolio optionality for capital allocation and diversification and the ability to deliver long-term corporate accretion.  In August 2016, we identified a potential acquisition, which we refer to as the Delaware Basin Acquisition, that we believe met our four key criteria.

We entered into definitive agreements relating to the Delaware Basin Acquisition in August 2016. The agreements contemplate that we will acquire an aggregate of approximately 57,000 net acres, approximately 30 wells and related midstream infrastructure in Reeves and Culberson Counties, Texas, for an aggregate consideration to the sellers of approximately $915 million in cash and approximately 9.4 million shares of our common stock (valued at approximately $590 million at the time the acquisition agreements were executed), subject to certain adjustments and ongoing due diligence. The acquisition agreements allow the sellers to include a specified amount of additional leases in the transaction, which would increase the purchase price. Upon executing the acquisition agreements, we paid a $100 million deposit toward the cash portion of the purchase price environment,into an escrow account. In some circumstances set forth in the acquisition agreements, we havecould be required to forfeit the $100 million deposit. The Delaware Basin Acquisition is expected to initially increase our daily production by approximately 7,000 Boe per day. The acquisition is expected to close in December 2016; however, there can be no assurance conditions to closing will be satisfied. Upon closing, we currently expect to initially run a two rig drilling program in the Delaware Basin. We are currently completing our budgeting process for 2017, but anticipate running two to three rigs in the Delaware Basin during 2017. Taking into account the anticipated plans for the Delaware Basin Acquisition properties, we expect that pursuit of our development program will require capital in excess of our projected cash flows from operations for some period of time beginning in 2017.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

In order to fund the cash portion of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, we completed a public offering of 9,085,000 shares of our common stock, a public offering of the 2021 Convertible Notes and a private offering of the 2024 Senior Notes in September 2016 (collectively, the "Securities Issuances"). The common stock was issued at a price to us of $61.51 per share for net proceeds of approximately $558.5 million, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts. Net proceeds of the issuances of the 2021 Convertible Notes and 2024 Senior Notes were approximately $194 million and $392.3 million, respectively, after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts. If the Delaware Basin Acquisition is not materially altered the company-wide development plan utilized in ourcompleted on or prior to December 31, 2014 reserve report due2016 (or in some circumstances by or on January 15, 2017), the 2024 Senior Notes will be redeemed in whole at a special mandatory redemption price equal to drilling efficiencies100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Prior to the Securities Issuances, we entered into a reductioncommitment letter with JPMorgan regarding certain aspects of the temporary financing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition. The commitment letter contemplated, among other things, (i) a senior unsecured bridge loan to us in our well development costs. See our 2014 Form 10-K for a sensitivity analysis on how changes in commodity prices would have impacted our estimated reserves quantities at December 31, 2014. Duean aggregate principal amount not to these factors, we believe the projected SEC commodity pricesexceed $600 million, to be useddrawn, if at all, at the closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, (ii) a $250 million increase in the 2015 year-end reserve report will not cause a material reductioncommitments under our existing revolving credit facility and (iii) certain related proposed amendments and waivers to our existing credit facility agreement. We expect to fund the cash consideration payable in the quantityDelaware Basin Acquisition with proceeds from the Securities Issuances. Following the completion of the Securities Issuances, the bridge loan commitment was terminated. Upon closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, we will be required to pay approximately $9 million in fees related to the bridge loan commitment, approximately $6 million in fees related to the increase in commitments under the revolving credit facility and approximately $10 million in other direct acquisition-related costs. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded charges for the bridge loan commitment fees and the other direct acquisition-related costs. The $9 million charge for fees related to the bridge loan commitment is included in interest expense and the $10 million charge for other direct acquisition-related costs is included in general and administrative expenses. The liabilities associated with both amounts are included in other accrued expenses on our estimated proved reserves. However, we expect these factors will cause the pre-tax present value using the projected SEC commodity prices for future net revenues (“PV-10”) to significantly decrease at December 31, 2015. The actual impact on December 31, 2015 SEC reserve quantities and their PV-10 value will depend upon the facts and circumstances at year-end.condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016.

Liquidity

Available liquidity as of September 30, 20152016 was $392.0$1,636 million compared to $398.4$402.2 million as of December 31, 2014.2015. Available liquidity as of September 30, 20152016 is comprised of $3.7$1,197.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and $388.3$438.3 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility. These amounts exclude an additional $250 million available under our revolving credit facility that will be available following the closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition and may be available in other circumstances subject to certain terms and conditions of the agreement. In September 2015,October 2016, we completed the semi-annual redetermination of the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility by the lenders, which resulted in the reaffirmation of the borrowing base at $700 million. We have elected to maintain the aggregate commitment level at $450 million.

In March 2015, we completed a public offering of 4,002,000 shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $203 million after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts. We used a portionuntil the closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2016 included approximately $392.3 million of proceeds from the issuance of the offering2024 Senior Notes. If, however, the Delaware Basin Acquisition is not completed prior to repay all amounts then outstandingor on our revolving credit facility, and usedDecember 31, 2016 (or in some circumstances by or on January 15, 2017), the remaining amounts$400 million principal amount of the 2024 Senior Notes is required to fund a portion of our capital program.be redeemed with interest. If required, we will redeem the 2024 Senior Notes with available cash. With our current derivative position, available liquidity and expected cash flows from operations, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to allow us to fund our operations and the cash portion of the purchase price for the Delaware Basin Acquisition and execute our expected capital program through2016 development program.

The following table presents our liquidity as of September 30, 2016 pro forma for the remainderclosing of 2015.the Delaware Basin Acquisition, reflecting cash to be paid and the increase in the aggregate commitments under our revolving credit facility:

As of September 30, 2016 Amount
  (in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents $1,197.7
Available for borrowing under our credit facility 438.3
Available liquidity 1,636.0
Increase in aggregate commitments under our revolving credit facility 250.0
Cash due upon closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition (1) (840.0)
Adjusted liquidity $1,046.0
__________
(1)Amount includes total cash portion of purchase price due to sellers, less $100 million deposit in escrow and estimated acquisition-related costs. Amount does not reflect potential purchase price adjustments to be determined upon and post closing.
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Operational Overview

Drilling Activities.During the nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, we continued to execute our strategic plan to grow production while preserving our financial strength and liquidity. Through July 2016, we ran four automated drilling rigs in the Wattenberg Field. In August 2016, we decreased the number of increasing production, reserves and cash flows fromautomated drilling operationsrigs running in the Wattenberg Field to three in Colorado and completion activitiesanticipation of higher working interests in wells drilled resulting from the Utica Shale play in southeastern Ohio. In the Wattenberg Field, we are currently running five automated drilling rigs and expect to decrease our rig count to four in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to the increases in our drilling rig efficiencies.aforementioned acreage exchange with Noble. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, we spud 130107 horizontal wells and turned-in-line 93121 horizontal wells in the Wattenberg Field. We also participated in 3811 gross, 4.72.8 net, horizontal non-operated wells that were spud and 24 gross, 5.45.0 net, horizontal non-operated wells which were turned-in-line. We began implementing several well-recovery enhancements in 2015, including tighter spacing between frac intervals on all wells and drilling 40% of our wells with extended reach laterals of 6,500 feet to 7,000 feet. We have been able to improve our drilling time due to several factors, includingDuring the use of automated drilling rigs that minimize downtime, improved drilling team cohesion and utilizing analytics to improve drilling efficiencies. In the Utica Shale, we completed and turned-in-line a four-well pad during the first half of 2015. As a result of the four-well pads turned-in-line at the end of 2014 and the second quarter of 2015, production volumes from the Utica Shale increased 57% and 48% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared2016, we drilled and completed five wells in the Utica Shale, three of which were turned-in-line during the period. Of these three wells, one is an approximately 10,000 foot lateral well located in Guernsey County and two are approximately 6,000 foot lateral wells located in Washington County. We plan to turn-in-line the same prior year periods.two remaining wells over the next several months.
    
20152016 Operational Outlook

We expect our production for 2016 to meetbe at the high end or slightly exceed the high21.0 MMBoe to 22.0 MMBoe range disclosed earlier in the year and our production rate for December 2016 to exceed 71,000 Boe per day, including the impact of expected production from the Delaware Basin Acquisition, assuming the acquisition closes in December 2016. Our revised 2016 capital forecast of $400 million to $420 million is focused on continuing to provide value-driven production growth by exploiting our substantial inventory of projects in the Wattenberg Field. Currently, excluding acquisition costs that we expect to incur in 2016 related to the Delaware Basin Acquisition, we expect to be near or slightly below the low end of our prior 2015 production guidancethe expected range of 15.0 MMBoe, while maintaining our previously provided capital guidance range of $520 million to $550 million. Through the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we have invested approximately $421 million, or 77% to 81%, of our capital forecast. Crudeexpenditures.


Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.



Colorado Ballot Initiative Update

During 2016, certain interest groups in Colorado opposed to oil is expectedand natural gas development generally, or hydraulic fracturing in particular, advanced various options for ballot initiatives aimed at significantly limiting or effectively preventing oil and natural gas development in the state of Colorado. Proponents of two such initiatives attempted to comprise 47%qualify the initiatives to appear on the ballot for the November 2016 election. On August 29, 2016, the Colorado Secretary of State issued a press release and statements of insufficiency of signatures, stating that the proponents of the proposals had failed to collect enough valid signatures to have the proposals included on the ballot.
One of the initiatives, which we refer to as the “local control” initiative, would have amended the state constitution to give city, town and county governments the right to regulate, or to ban, oil and gas development and production within their boundaries, notwithstanding rules and approvals to the contrary at the state level. This proposal was motivated in part by a decision of the Colorado Supreme Court earlier this year holding that local government restrictions on oil and gas activities are subject to preemption by state rules.
A second initiative, which we refer to as the “setback” initiative, would have amended the state constitution to require all new oil and gas development facilities to be located at least 2,500 feet away from any occupied structure or broadly defined “area of special concern,” including public and community drinking water sources, lakes, rivers, perennial or intermittent streams, creeks, irrigation canals, riparian areas, playgrounds, permanent sports fields, amphitheaters, public parks and public open space.
If implemented, the setback initiative would have effectively prohibited the vast majority of our revisedplanned future drilling activities in Colorado and would therefore have made it impossible to pursue our current development plans. The local control proposal would potentially have had a similar effect, depending on the nature and extent of regulations implemented by relevant local governmental authorities. Pursuant to the determination of the Colorado Secretary of State, these proposals will not appear on the November 2016 ballot. However, future proposals of this nature are possible.

Because substantially all of our current operations and reserves are located in Colorado, the risks we face with respect to such future proposals are greater than those of our competitors with more geographically diverse operations. Although we cannot predict the outcome of future ballot initiatives, statutes or regulatory developments, such developments could materially impact our results of operations, production and we expect a year-end exit rate exceeding 48,000 Boe per day. We expect to direct the remaining capital primarily to our drilling program in the Wattenberg Field, where we have reduced our per well development costs for both standard and extended reach laterals. Further, due toreserves.


23



Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

improved drilling techniques and reduced drilling time, the number of horizontal Niobrara or Codell horizontal wells expected to be spud and turned-in-line in 2015 is approximately 176 and 137, respectively. During the third quarter of 2015, our cash flows from operations approximated our cash flows from investing activities and we expect the same for the remainder of 2015.

Wattenberg Field. We expect to spud approximately 176 and turn-in-line 133 horizontal Niobrara or Codell wells in 2015, of which approximately 40% are expected to be extended reach laterals of approximately 6,500 feet to 7,000 feet. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we spud 53 horizontal wells and turned-in-line 33 operated horizontal wells. Approximately 75% of the wells are expected to target the Niobrara formation, with the remainder targeting the Codell formation. We expect to participate in approximately 54 gross, 8.5 net, non-operated horizontal opportunities in 2015. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we invested approximately $395 million in the Wattenberg Field.

Utica Shale. Based upon current low commodity prices and large natural gas price differentials in Appalachia, we elected to temporarily cease drilling in the Utica Shale in early 2015 in favor of allocating more of our 2015 capital program to our higher return projects in the Wattenberg Field's inner and middle core areas. In 2015, we directed our investment in the Utica Shale to complete and turn-in-line the four-well pad that was in-process as of December 31, 2014 and for lease maintenance, exploration and other expenditures. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we invested approximately $23 million in the Utica Shale, the majority of which was for completion activities on the four-well pad. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we expect to make a moderate capital investment in our Washington County acreage so as to provide further support for future drilling on our southern acreage in the Utica Shale.

24

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Results of Operations

Summary Operating Results

The following table presents selected information regarding our operating results from continuing operations:results:
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 2014 Percentage Change 2015 2014 Percentage Change2016 2015 Percentage Change 2016 2015 Percentage Change
(dollars in millions, except per unit data)(dollars in millions, except per unit data)
Production (1)                      
Crude oil (MBbls)2,007.8
 1,072.3
 87.2 % 4,895.9
 3,192.3
 53.4 %2,339.8
 2,007.8
 16.5 % 6,240.2
 4,895.9
 27.5 %
Natural gas (MMcf)9,148.9
 4,910.1
 86.3 % 22,997.0
 13,611.1
 69.0 %13,417.4
 9,148.9
 46.7 % 36,768.2
 22,997.0
 59.9 %
NGLs (MBbls)793.0
 461.7
 71.8 % 1,858.5
 1,252.2
 48.4 %1,428.1
 793.0
 80.1 % 3,402.8
 1,858.5
 83.1 %
Crude oil equivalent (MBoe) (2)4,325.6
 2,352.3
 83.9 % 10,587.3
 6,713.0
 57.7 %6,004.2
 4,325.6
 38.8 % 15,771.0
 10,587.3
 49.0 %
Average MBoe per day47.0
 25.6
 83.9 % 38.8
 24.6
 57.7 %65.3
 47.0
 38.8 % 57.6
 38.8
 49.0 %
Crude Oil, Natural Gas and NGLs Sales                      
Crude oil$78.3
 $90.8
 (13.8)% $206.7
 $279.4
 (26.0)%$98.5
 $78.3
 25.8 % $233.0
 $206.7
 12.7 %
Natural gas18.8
 17.2
 9.3 % 49.4
 55.0
 (10.2)%27.4
 18.8
 45.7 % 59.6
 49.4
 20.6 %
NGLs7.4
 12.5
 (40.8)% 19.4
 37.2
 (47.8)%15.9
 7.4
 114.9 % 35.4
 19.4
 82.5 %
Total crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales$104.5
 $120.5
 (13.3)% $275.5
 $371.6
 (25.9)%$141.8
 $104.5
 35.7 % $328.0
 $275.5
 19.1 %
                      
Net Settlements on Derivatives (3)                      
Crude oil$39.5
 $60.7
 (34.9)% $131.6
 $142.4
 (7.6)%
Natural gas$7.3
 $0.3
 *
 $20.1
 $(3.9) *
8.2
 7.3
 12.3 % 36.3
 20.1
 80.6 %
Crude oil60.7
 (4.8) *
 142.4
 (17.6) *
Total net settlements on derivatives$68.0
 $(4.5) *
 $162.5
 $(21.5) *
$47.7
 $68.0
 (29.9)% $167.9
 $162.5
 3.3 %
                      
Average Sales Price (excluding net settlements on derivatives)                      
Crude oil (per Bbl)$38.98
 $84.67
 (54.0)% $42.22
 $87.51
 (51.8)%$42.11
 $38.98
 8.0 % $37.33
 $42.22
 (11.6)%
Natural gas (per Mcf)2.05
 3.50
 (41.4)% 2.15
 4.04
 (46.8)%2.04
 2.05
 (0.5)% 1.62
 2.15
 (24.7)%
NGLs (per Bbl)9.40
 27.15
 (65.4)% 10.45
 29.73
 (64.9)%11.12
 9.40
 18.3 % 10.41
 10.45
 (0.4)%
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)24.15
 51.24
 (52.9)% 26.02
 55.35
 (53.0)%23.62
 24.15
 (2.2)% 20.80
 26.02
 (20.1)%
                      
Average Lease Operating Expenses (per Boe) (4)                      
Wattenberg Field$3.00
 $4.73
 (36.6)% $4.06
 $4.67
 (13.1)%$2.39
 $3.31
 (27.8)% $2.77
 $4.24
 (34.7)%
Utica Shale1.17
 2.68
 (56.3)% 1.49
 1.79
 (16.8)%1.27
 1.74
 (27.0)% 1.87
 1.77
 5.6 %
Weighted-average2.87
 4.56
 (37.1)% 3.85
 4.42
 (12.9)%2.33
 3.20
 (27.2)% 2.73
 4.04
 (32.4)%
                      
Natural Gas Marketing Contribution Margin (5)$(0.2) $
 *
 $(0.6) $
 *
$(0.4) $(0.2) 100.0 % $(1.1) $(0.6) (83.3)%
                      
Other Costs and Expenses                      
Exploration expense$0.3
 $0.2
 32.6 % $0.8
 $0.8
 5.0 %
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties153.5
 1.9
 *
 158.8
 3.6
 *
Production taxes$9.6
 $5.5
 74.7 % $19.7
 $13.2
 49.0 %
Transportation, gathering and processing expenses5.0
 3.9
 28.2 % 13.6
 6.6
 105.9 %
Impairment of properties and equipment0.9
 154.0
 (99.4)% 6.1
 161.2
 (96.2)%
General and administrative expense18.5
 34.6
 (46.5)% 55.9
 96.5
 (42.1)%32.5
 20.3
 60.3 % 78.9
 62.1
 27.1 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization80.9
 49.6
 63.1 % 206.9
 142.2
 45.5 %112.9
 80.9
 39.5 % 317.3
 206.9
 53.4 %
Provision for uncollectible notes receivable(0.7) 
 *
 44.0
 
 *
                      
Interest expense$12.1
 $11.8
 2.3 % $35.4
 $36.2
 (2.3)%$20.2
 $12.1
 67.0 % $42.8
 $35.4
 20.8 %
*Percentage change is not meaningful or equal to or greater than 300%.
Amounts may not recalculate due to rounding.
______________
(1)Production is net and determined by multiplying the gross production volume of properties in which we have an interest by our ownership percentage.
(2)One Bbl of crude oil or NGL equals six Mcf of natural gas.
(3)Represents net settlements on derivatives related to crude oil and natural gas sales, which do not include net settlements on derivatives related to natural gas marketing.
(4)Represents lease operating expenses, exclusive of production taxes, on a per unit basis.
(5)Represents sales from natural gas marketing, net of costs of natural gas marketing, including net settlements and net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives related to natural gas marketing activities.



25

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.


Crude Oil, Natural Gas and NGLs Sales

The following tables present crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production and weighted-average sales price from continuing operations:price:
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Production by Operating Region 2015 2014 Percentage Change 2015 2014 Percentage Change 2016 2015 Percentage Change 2016 2015 Percentage Change
Crude oil (MBbls)                        
Wattenberg Field 1,868.6
 1,012.0
 84.6% 4,509.5
 2,973.1
 51.7% 2,216.3
 1,868.6
 18.6 % 5,928.5
 4,509.5
 31.5 %
Utica Shale 139.2
 60.3
 130.8% 386.4
 219.2
 76.3% 123.5
 139.2
 (11.3)% 311.7
 386.4
 (19.3)%
Total 2,007.8
 1,072.3
 87.2% 4,895.9
 3,192.3
 53.4% 2,339.8
 2,007.8
 16.5 % 6,240.2
 4,895.9
 27.5 %
Natural gas (MMcf)                        
Wattenberg Field 8,478.3
 4,318.6
 96.3% 21,040.7
 11,971.8
 75.8% 12,700.0
 8,478.3
 49.8 % 34,968.2
 21,040.7
 66.2 %
Utica Shale 670.6
 591.5
 13.4% 1,956.3
 1,639.3
 19.3% 717.4
 670.6
 7.0��% 1,800.0
 1,956.3
 (8.0)%
Total 9,148.9
 4,910.1
 86.3% 22,997.0
 13,611.1
 69.0% 13,417.4
 9,148.9
 46.7 % 36,768.2
 22,997.0
 59.9 %
NGLs (MBbls)                        
Wattenberg Field 730.6
 421.1
 73.5% 1,692.5
 1,151.3
 47.0% 1,353.0
 730.6
 85.2 % 3,240.4
 1,692.5
 91.5 %
Utica Shale 62.4
 40.6
 53.7% 166.0
 100.9
 64.5% 75.1
 62.4
 20.4 % 162.4
 166.0
 (2.2)%
Total 793.0
 461.7
 71.8% 1,858.5
 1,252.2
 48.4% 1,428.1
 793.0
 80.1 % 3,402.8
 1,858.5
 83.1 %
Crude oil equivalent (MBoe)                        
Wattenberg Field 4,012.3
 2,152.9
 86.4% 9,708.8
 6,119.7
 58.6% 5,686.0
 4,012.3
 41.7 % 14,996.9
 9,708.8
 54.5 %
Utica Shale 313.3
 199.4
 57.1% 878.5
 593.3
 48.1% 318.2
 313.3
 1.6 % 774.1
 878.5
 (11.9)%
Total 4,325.6
 2,352.3
 83.9% 10,587.3
 6,713.0
 57.7% 6,004.2
 4,325.6
 38.8 % 15,771.0
 10,587.3
 49.0 %

Amounts may not recalculate due to rounding.
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Average Sales Price by Operating Region     Percentage Change     Percentage Change     Percentage Change     Percentage Change
(excluding net settlements on derivatives) 2015 2014 2015 2014  2016 2015 2016 2015 
Crude oil (per Bbl)                        
Wattenberg Field $38.90
 $84.56
 (54.0)% $42.13
 $87.41
 (51.8)% $42.29
 $38.90
 8.7 % $37.42
 $42.13
 (11.2)%
Utica Shale 40.02
 86.56
 (53.8)% 43.28
 88.87
 (51.3)% 38.93
 40.02
 (2.7)% 35.61
 43.28
 (17.7)%
Weighted-average price 38.98
 84.67
 (54.0)% 42.22
 87.51
 (51.8)% 42.11
 38.98
 8.0 % 37.33
 42.22
 (11.6)%
Natural gas (per Mcf)                        
Wattenberg Field $2.11
 $3.65
 (42.2)% $2.17
 $4.10
 (47.1)% $2.08
 $2.11
 (1.4)% $1.63
 $2.17
 (24.9)%
Utica Shale 1.36
 2.45
 (44.5)% 1.92
 3.60
 (46.7)% 1.33
 1.36
 (2.2)% 1.44
 1.92
 (25.0)%
Weighted-average price 2.05
 3.50
 (41.4)% 2.15
 4.04
 (46.8)% 2.04
 2.05
 (0.5)% 1.62
 2.15
 (24.7)%
NGLs (per Bbl)                        
Wattenberg Field $9.62
 $25.89
 (62.8)% $10.36
 $28.17
 (63.2)% $11.07
 $9.62
 15.1 % $10.32
 $10.36
 (0.4)%
Utica Shale 6.80
 40.13
 (83.1)% 11.40
 47.58
 (76.0)% 12.14
 6.80
 78.5 % 12.22
 11.40
 7.2 %
Weighted-average price 9.40
 27.15
 (65.4)% 10.45
 29.73
 (64.9)% 11.12
 9.40
 18.3 % 10.41
 10.45
 (0.4)%
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)                        
Wattenberg Field $24.32
 $52.13
 (53.3)% $26.07
 $55.78
 (53.3)% $23.77
 $24.32
 (2.3)% $20.83
 $26.07
 (20.1)%
Utica Shale 22.04
 41.58
 (47.0)% 25.47
 51.17
 (50.2)% 20.98
 22.04
 (4.8)% 20.26
 25.47
 (20.5)%
Weighted-average price 24.15
 51.24
 (52.9)% 26.02
 55.35
 (53.0)% 23.62
 24.15
 (2.2)% 20.80
 26.02
 (20.1)%

Amounts may not recalculate due to rounding.


26

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales revenue decreasedincreased compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 20142015 due to the following (in millions):following:

 September 30, 2015
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
Decrease in average crude oil price$(91.7) (221.8)
Decrease in average natural gas price(13.3) (43.5)
Decrease in average NGLs price(14.1) (35.8)
Increase in production103.1
 205.0
Total decrease in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales revenue$(16.0) $(96.1)
 September 30, 2016
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 (in millions)
Increase in production$27.7
 $102.5
Increase (decrease) in average crude oil price7.3
 (30.5)
Decrease in average natural gas price(0.1) (19.4)
Increase (decrease) in average NGLs price2.4
 (0.1)
Total increase in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales revenue$37.3
 $52.5

Production from continuing operations for the third quarter of 20152016 was 4.36.0 million Boe, up from 2.44.3 million Boe in the third quarter of 2014.2015. Year-to-date, production from continuing operations was 10.615.8 million Boe, up from 6.710.6 million Boe in the first nine months of 2014.2015. Production increased as a result of continued drilling and completion activities as discussed in Operational Overview. We continued

From time to experiencetime, our production has been adversely affected by high line pressures on the midstream system in the Wattenberg Field inField. Such pressures did not materially affect our production for the first half of the year, but the Lucerne II processing plant and additional new compressor stations on the gathering system began initial operations in June 2015, resulting in immediate reductions in line pressures. We have experienced further line pressure reductions in the third quarter of 2015. Further, we expect sustained relief of gathering system pressure on our primary gatherer's system through 2016, depending upon the impact of reduced drilling activity in the field going forward. However, due to continued low commodity prices, our secondary midstream service provider, which currently gathers and processes approximately 30% of our Wattenberg Field gas, has indicated it may have limitations on its capital program in 2016, which may result in a  curtailment of certain of our projected 2016 volumes.three or nine months ended September 30, 2016. We rely on our third-party midstream service providers to construct compression, gathering and processing facilities to keep pace with our production growth. As a result,We, along with other operators in the Wattenberg Field, continue to work closely with our third-party midstream providers in an effort to ensure adequate system capacity going forward. The timing and availability of additional facilities going forwardadequate infrastructure, including potential line pressure impacts in 2017, is beyondnot within our control.control and may be affected by a number of factors, including potential increases in production from the Wattenberg Field and warmer than expected weather.

Crude Oil, Natural Gas and NGLs Pricing. Pricing. Our results of operations depend upon many factors, particularly the price of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs and our ability to market our production effectively. Crude oil, natural gas and NGLsNGL prices are among the most volatile of all commodity prices. TheWhile the price of crude oil decreased during the first nine months of 2016 compared to the first nine months of 2015, prices increased during the third quarter of 20152016 as compared to the first half of 2015 amid continuing concerns regarding high2016 as the number of U.S. crude oil rigs and inventories and slowing global demand for crude oil.declined. Natural gas prices during the third quarter of 2015 remained at the low levels seen throughout 2015, and were at significantly lower levels than the comparable periods of 2014. NGL prices declined significantlydecreased during the first nine months of 2015 and, while they have stabilized with2016 when compared to the prospectsame prior year period. Although we did experience improved pricing by the end of cooler weather and crop drying season, also remain atthe third quarter of 2016, due to an oversupply of nearly all domestic NGLs products, our average realized sales price for NGLs during the first nine months of 2016 reflected the same low levels relativeseen during 2015. With the initiation of ethane exports and increased demand for NGLs, we are starting to those experienced in the comparable periods of 2014.see NGL prices trend upward.

Crude oil pricing is predominately driven by the physical market, supply and demand, financial markets and national and international politics. In the Wattenberg Field, crude oil is sold under various purchase contracts primarily with monthly and longer term pricing provisions based on NYMEX pricing, adjusted for differentials. We are currently pursuinghave entered into longer term commitments ranging from three months to six months to deliver crude oil to competitive markets and these agreements have resulted in significantly improved deductions compared to the comparable period in 2015. We continue to pursue various alternatives with respect to oil transportation, particularly in the Wattenberg Field, with a view toward further improving pricing.pricing and limiting our use of trucking of production. We began delivering crude oil in accordance with our long term commitment to the White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC ("White Cliffs") pipeline at the beginning ofin July 2015. This facilitatesis one of several agreements we have entered into to facilitate deliveries of a significant portion of our crude oil to the Cushing, Oklahoma market. In addition, we have signed a long-term agreement for gathering of crude oil at the wellhead by pipeline from several of our pads in the Wattenberg Field, with a view toward minimizing truck traffic, increasing reliability and reducing the overall physical footprint of our well pads. We expect to deliverbegan delivering crude oil into this pipeline during the fourth quarter of 2015. We continue to evaluate crude oil takeaway options to determine2015 and the benefits of additional longer term commitments to deliver to competitive markets and, as a result, have entered into some three-month and six-month agreements that have resultedsystem was fully operational on certain wells in significantly improved deductions compared to earlier in the year.2016. In the Utica Shale, crude oil and condensate is sold to a local purchaserpurchasers at each individual well sitepad based on NYMEX pricing, adjusted for quality differentials.differentials, and is typically transported by the purchasers via truck to local refineries, rail facilities or barge loading terminals on the Ohio River.

Natural gas prices vary by region and locality, depending upon the distance to markets, availability of pipeline capacity and supply and demand relationships in that region or locality. The price we receive for our natural gas produced in the Wattenberg Field is based on CIG and local utility prices, adjusted for certain deductions, while natural gas produced in the Utica Shale is based on TETCO M-2 pricing with a portion of our volumes currently receiving an increase in price relative to the index based upon delivery to the Chicago/Midwest market. Our sale of a significant portion of our Utica Shale gas to the Midwest market has helped to reduce the impact of the significant differentials that exist between the TETCO M-2 realizations and the NYMEX gas price.pricing. We anticipate that the significant Appalachian pipeline differentials that impact our Utica Shale natural gas will continue at leastthrough the remainder of 2016 and into 2016.2017.

Our price for NGLs produced in the Wattenberg Field is based on a combination of prices from the Conway hub in Kansas and Mt. Belvieu in Texas where this production is marketed. The NGLs produced in the Utica Shale are sold based on month-to-month pricing to various markets. Due to an oversupply and growing inventoriesWhile NGL prices had been declining, we have seen a stabilization of nearly all domestic NGLs products, our realized sales price for NGLs declined significantly during the first three quarters of 2015 and, while these prices have stabilized, we expect pricing to remain at depressed levels well into 2016 and perhaps beyond.in 2016.

Our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales are recorded under either the “net-back” or "gross" method of accounting, depending upon the transportation method used.related purchase agreement. We use the "net-back" method of accounting for natural gas and NGLs, as well as a portionthe majority of our crude oil production, from the Wattenberg Field and for crude oil from the Utica Shale as the majority of the purchasers of these commodities also provide transportation, gathering and processing services. We sell our commodities at the wellhead and collect a price and recognize revenues based on

27

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

the wellhead sales price as transportation and processing costs downstream of the wellhead are incurred by the purchaser and reflected in the
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

wellhead price. The net-back method results in the recognition of a sales price that is below the indices for which the production is based. We use the "gross" method of accounting for Wattenberg Field crude oil delivered through the White Cliffs pipelineand Saddle Butte pipelines and for natural gas and NGLs sales related to production from the Utica Shale as the purchasers do not provide transportation, gathering or processing services. Under this method, we recognize revenues based on the gross selling price and recognize transportation, gathering and processing expenses as a component of production costs.expenses. As a result of the White Cliffs agreement,and Saddle Butte agreements, during the threenine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, our Wattenberg Field crude oil average sales price increased approximately $1.28$1.24 per barrel attributablerelative to recognizing thesethe benchmark price because we recognized the costs for transportation on the White Cliffs pipelineand Saddle Butte pipelines as an increase in transportation expense, rather than as a deduction from revenues.

Production CostsLease Operating Expenses

Production costs include lease operating expenses, production taxes, transportation, gathering and processing costs and certain production and engineering staff-related overhead costs, as well as other costs to operate wells and pipelines as follows:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
 (in millions)
        
Lease operating expenses$12.4
 $10.7
 $40.7
 $29.7
Production taxes5.5
 8.8
 13.2
 22.7
Transportation, gathering and processing expenses3.9
 1.2
 6.6
 3.3
Overhead and other production expenses
3.7
 2.1
 10.6
 9.0
Total production costs$25.5
 $22.8
 $71.1
 $64.7
Total production costs per Boe$5.89
 $9.67
 $6.72
 $9.62
        

Lease operating expenses. The $1.7 million increase in lease operating expenses during the three months ended September 30, 20152016 increased $0.2 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 was2015, primarily due to an increaseincreases of $0.8 million for environmental remediationpayroll and regulatory compliance projectsemployee benefits and $0.8 million for additional wagesleased compressors to address increases in line pressure. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $1 million related to mechanical integrity testing of wells and employee benefits, including costs for additional contract labor. The $11.0$0.2 million increase in leaseenvironmental project costs. Lease operating expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 increased $0.3 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was2015, primarily due to an increaseincreases of $5.4$1.6 million for payroll and employee benefits, $1.1 million for leased compressors to address line pressure issues and $1 million for various other lease operating expenses. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $2.6 million for environmental remediation and regulatory compliance projects, an increase of $2.7 million for additional wages and employee benefits, includingproject costs for additional contract labor, $1.3 million for lease operating expenses incurred on the increasing number of non-operated wells in the Wattenberg Field and $0.7 million for additional costs pertainingplugging and abandonment costs. Lease operating expenses per Boe decreased 27% and 32% to water hauling$2.33 and disposal.$2.73 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $3.20 and $4.04 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The significant decreases in lease operating expense per Boe were the result of production growth of 39% and 49%, respectively.

Production taxes. Taxes

Production taxes are directly related to crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales. The $3.3$4.1 million or 38%, decreaseincrease in production taxes forduring the three months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014,2015 was primarily related to the 13% decrease36% increase in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales, and lower productionas well as higher severance tax rates. Similarly, the $9.5rates based upon projected sales revenue. The $6.5 million or 42%, decreaseincrease in production taxes forduring the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014,2015 was primarily related to the 26% decrease19% increase in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales, and loweras well as higher severance tax rates due to higher projected sales revenue coupled with a decrease in ad valorem tax credits available from 2015 production tax rates.due to depressed commodity pricing in 2015.

Transportation, Gathering and Processing Expenses

The $1.1 million increase in transportation, gathering and processing expenses. The $2.7 million and $3.3 million increases during the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was mainly attributable to oil transportation costcosts on the White CliffsSaddle Butte pipeline as we began delivering crude oil aton this pipeline in December 2015. The $7 million increase in transportation, gathering and processing expenses during the beginning ofnine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, was mainly attributable to oil transportation costs on the White Cliffs and Saddle Butte pipelines as we began delivering crude oil on these pipelines in July 2015.2015 and December 2015, respectively. We expect to continue to incur these oil transportation costs pursuant to our long-term firm transportation agreement.

Overhead and other production expenses. The $1.6 million increase during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 was mainly attributable to an increase of $0.8 million in adjustments to the value of our crude oil inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, the majority of which was attributable to the value of inventory for the White Cliffs pipeline line fill and an increase of $0.4 million in expired prepaid well costs. The $1.6 million increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was mainly attributable to an increase of $1.1 million in expired prepaid well costs and an increase of $0.3 million in adjustments to value our crude oil inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value.agreements.

Commodity Price Risk Management, Net

We use various derivative instruments to manage fluctuations in natural gas and crude oil prices. We have in place a variety of collars, fixed-price swaps and basis swaps on a portion of our estimated natural gas and crude oil production. Because we sell all of our natural gas and crude oil production at prices similar to the indexes inherent in our derivative instruments, adjusted for certain fees and surcharges stipulated in the applicable sales agreements, we ultimately realize a price, before contract fees, related to our collars of no less than the floor and no more than the ceiling and, for our commodity swaps, we ultimately realize the fixed price related to our swaps.swaps, less deductions. See Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed presentation of our derivative positions as of September 30, 2016.


28

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Commodity price risk management, net, includes cash settlements upon maturity of our derivative instruments and the change in fair value of unsettled derivatives related to our crude oil and natural gas production. Commodity price risk management, net, does not include derivative transactions related to our natural gas marketing, which are included in sales from and cost of natural gas marketing. See Note 3, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, and Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional details of our derivative financial instruments.

Net settlements are primarily the result of crude oil and natural gas index prices at maturity of our derivative instruments compared to the respective strike prices. Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives is comprised of the net asset increase or decrease in the beginning-of-periodbeginning-of- period fair value of derivative instruments that settled during the period and the net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives during the period. The corresponding impact of settlement of the derivative instruments that settled during the period is included in net settlements for the period as discussed above. Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives during the period is primarily related to shifts in the crude oil and natural gas forward curves and changes in certain differentials.basis index pricing. See Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed description of net settlements on our various derivatives.
Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.


The following table presents net settlements and net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives included in commodity price risk management, net:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
 (in millions)
Commodity price risk management gain, net:       
Net settlements:       
Crude oil$60.7
 $(4.8) $142.4
 $(17.6)
Natural gas7.3
 0.3
 20.1
 (3.9)
Total net settlements68.0
 (4.5) 162.5
 (21.5)
Change in fair value of unsettled derivatives:       
Reclassification of settlements included in prior period changes in fair value of derivatives(48.1) 12.8
 (140.2) 11.2
Crude oil fixed price swaps50.4
 63.5
 51.4
 16.5
Crude oil collars28.5
 10.2
 28.6
 3.3
Natural gas fixed price swaps19.5
 6.5
 31.0
 2.4
Natural gas basis swaps(1.0) 
 (2.4) 
Natural gas collars6.2
 1.7
 10.3
 0.8
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives55.5
 94.7
 (21.3) 34.2
Total commodity price risk management gain, net$123.5
 $90.2
 $141.2
 $12.7

Natural Gas Marketing
Fluctuations in our natural gas marketing segment's income contribution are primarily due to fluctuations in commodity prices, cash settlements upon maturity of derivative instruments and the change in fair value of unsettled derivatives, and, to a lesser extent, volumes sold and purchased.

The following table presents the components of sales from and costs of natural gas marketing:

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
 (in millions)
Natural gas sales revenue$2.4
 $12.9
 $8.0
 $62.9
Net settlements from derivatives0.2
 0.2
 0.6
 (0.4)
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives

 0.2
 (0.3) 0.1
Total sales from natural gas marketing2.6
 13.3
 8.3
 62.6
        
Costs of natural gas purchases2.4
 12.6
 8.0
 61.8
Net settlements from derivatives0.2
 0.2
 0.5
 (0.5)
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives

 0.2
 (0.3) 0.2
Other0.2
 0.3
 0.7
 1.1
Total costs of natural gas marketing2.8
 13.3
 8.9
 62.6
        
Natural gas marketing contribution margin$(0.2) $
 $(0.6) $
        


29

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Natural gas sales revenue and cost of natural gas purchases decreased in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as our Gas Marketing segment has scaled down following the divestiture of our Appalachian Basin natural gas properties. Our Gas Marketing segment sold approximately 1.1 Bcf of natural gas at an average price of $1.14 per Mcf during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to approximately 5.0 Bcf of natural gas at an average price of $2.35 per Mcf during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Our Gas Marketing segment sold approximately 3.3 Bcf of natural gas at an average price of $1.42 per Mcf during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to approximately 16.5 Bcf of natural gas at an average price of $3.62 per Mcf during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Derivative instruments related to natural gas marketing include both physical and cash-settled derivatives. We offer fixed-price
derivative contracts for the purchase or sale of physical natural gas and enter into cash-settled derivative positions with counterparties in order
to offset those same physical positions.
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net:       
Net settlements:       
Crude oil$39.5
 $60.7
 $131.6
 $142.4
Natural gas8.2
 7.3
 36.3
 20.1
Total net settlements47.7
 68.0
 167.9
 162.5
Change in fair value of unsettled derivatives:       
Reclassification of settlements included in prior period changes in fair value of derivatives(40.6) (48.1) (169.5) (140.2)
Crude oil fixed price swaps3.3
 50.4
 (33.8) 51.4
Crude oil collars1.5
 28.5
 (14.5) 28.6
Natural gas fixed price swaps5.4
 19.5
 (10.7) 31.0
Natural gas basis swaps1.4
 (1.0) 0.7
 (2.4)
Natural gas collars0.7
 6.2
 (2.4) 10.3
Net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives(28.3) 55.5
 (230.2) (21.3)
Total commodity price risk management gain (loss), net$19.4
 $123.5
 $(62.3) $141.2

Impairment of Crude OilProperties and Natural Gas PropertiesEquipment
    
The following table sets forth the major components of our impairmentsimpairment of crude oilproperties and natural gas propertiesequipment expense:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 2014 2015 20142016 2015 2016 2015
(in thousands)(in millions)
              
Impairment of proved and unproved properties$150.3
 $
 $150.3
 $
$0.3
 $150.8
 $2.4
 $152.8
Amortization of individually insignificant unproved properties3.2
 1.1
 8.5
 2.8
0.6
 3.2
 0.7
 8.4
Other
 0.8
 
 0.8
Total impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties$153.5
 $1.9
 $158.8
 $3.6
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties
0.9
 154.0
 3.1
 161.2
Land and buildings
 
 3.0
 
Impairment of properties and equipment$0.9
 $154.0
 $6.1
 $161.2

Impairment of proved and unproved properties.properties. Due to a significant decline in commodity prices and a decrease in net-back realizations in the third quarter of 2015, we experienced a triggering event that required us to assess our crude oil and natural gas properties for possible impairment during the third quarter of 2015.impairment. As a result of our assessment, we recorded an impairment charge during the three months ended September 30, 2015 of $150.3 million to write-down our Utica Shale proved and unproved properties. Of this impairment charge, $24.7 million was recorded to write-down certain capitalized well costs on our Utica Shale proved producing properties. The impairment charge represented the amount by which the carrying value of these crude oil and natural gas properties exceeded the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of approximately $27.9 million was determined based on estimated future discounted net cash flows, a Level 3 input, using estimated production and prices at which we reasonably expect the crude oil and natural gas will be sold. Additionally, as a result of the current outlook for future commodity prices at that time, we recorded an impairment charge of $125.6 million to write-down all of our Utica Shale lease acquisition costs and pad development costs for pads not in production. FurtherFuture deterioration of commodity prices could result in additional impairment charges to our crude oil and natural gas properties.

Amortization of individually insignificant unproved properties. The period-over-period increases were primarily relatedAmounts relate to a higher number of insignificant leases that were subject to amortization. The decreases in amortization primarilyduring the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were due to an impairment in the third quarter of 2015 that significantly reduced the carrying value of our Utica Shale where we have altered drilling plans dueleases.

Land and buildings. The impairment charge for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value, less the cost to lower crude oil pricessell, of a field operating facility in Greeley, Colorado, and as12 acres of land located adjacent to our Bridgeport, West Virginia, regional headquarters. The fair values of these assets were determined based upon estimated future cash flows from unrelated third-party bids, a result, expect certain leases to expire.Level 3 input.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense decreased $16.1increased $12.2 million to $18.5$32.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $34.6$20.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to $16.2$11.3 million recorded duringof fees and expenses related to the three months ended September 30, 2014Delaware Basin Acquisition and a $1.2 million increase in connection with certain partnership-related class action litigationpayroll and estimates relating to litigation arising from bankruptcy proceedings of certain affiliated partnerships.employee benefits.

General and administrative expense decreased $40.6increased $16.8 million to $55.9$78.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $96.5$62.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to $40.3$11.3 million recorded duringof fees and expenses related to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 in connection with certain partnership-related class action litigation and estimates relating to litigation arising from bankruptcy proceedings of certain affiliated partnerships andDelaware Basin Acquisition, a $3.0 million decrease in costs for legal and other professional services during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decreases were offset in part by a $2.5$4.5 million increase in payroll and employee benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.and a $0.6 million increase in costs for consulting and other professional services.
    

30

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Expense

Crude oil and natural gas properties. DD&A expense related to crude oil and natural gas properties is directly related to proved reserves and production volumes. DD&A expense related to crude oil and natural gas properties was $112.1 million and $314.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $79.8 million and $203.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared to $48.7 million and $139.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The period-over-period increases were comprised of increases of $40.8 millionchange in DD&A expense related to crude oil and $80.5 millionnatural gas properties was primarily due to higher production during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, offset in part by decreases of $9.7 million and $16.1 million due to lower weighted-average depreciation, depletion and amortization rates during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.following:

  September 30, 2016
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  (in millions)
Increase in production $32.0
 $104.1
Increase in weighted-average depreciation, depletion and amortization rates 0.3
 6.8
Total increase in DD&A expense related to crude oil and natural gas properties $32.3
 $110.9

The following table presents our DD&A expense rates for crude oil and natural gas properties:

  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Operating Region/Area 2015 2014 2015 2014
  (per Boe)
Wattenberg Field $19.10
 $19.56
 $19.92
 $19.78
Utica Shale 10.08
 32.98
 11.49
 30.75
Total weighted-average 18.44
 20.70
 19.22
 20.73

The decrease in the Utica Shale DD&A expense rate during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the effect of an impairment recorded in December 2014 to write-down certain capitalized well costs on our Utica Shale proved producing properties, which lowered the net book value of the properties by approximately $112.6 million.
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Operating Region/Area 2016 2015 2016 2015
  (per Boe)
Wattenberg Field $19.17
 $19.10
 $20.42
 $19.92
Utica Shale 9.59
 10.08
 10.52
 11.49
Total weighted-average 18.66
 18.44
 19.94
 19.22

Non-crude oil and natural gas properties. Depreciation expense for non-crude oil and natural gas properties was $0.9 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $1.2 million and $3.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $3.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

Interest IncomeProvision for Uncollectible Notes Receivable

Interest income increasedDuring the first quarter of 2016, we recorded a provision for uncollectible notes receivable of $44.7 million to $1.4 million forimpair two third-party notes receivable whose collection was not reasonably assured. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, mainly attributable to $1.12016, we subsequently collected a $0.7 million of non-cash interest income recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2015 on a promissory note received as partand reversed the related provision and allowance for uncollectible notes receivable. See Note 3, Fair Value of the considerationFinancial Instruments - Notes Receivable, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for the saleadditional information.
Table of our entire 50% ownership interest in PDCM, of which $0.8 million was paid-in-kind and added to the principal amount of the promissory note.contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Interest income increased to $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, mainly attributable to $3.4 million of non-cash interest income recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 on the above-mentioned promissory note, of which $2.4 million was paid-in-kind and added to the principal amount of the promissory note.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $0.3$8.1 million to $12.1and $7.4 million forduring the three and nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to $11.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The increase isincreases were primarily comprised ofattributable to a $0.2$9 million increase duecharge for the bridge loan commitment related to higher average borrowingsthe Delaware Basin Acquisition, partially offset by decreases in interest expense on our revolving credit facilitythe 2016 Convertible Notes as they matured in May 2016.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased $1.2 million and $1.8 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Interest expense decreased $0.8 million2016 compared to $35.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $36.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease is primarily comprised of a $2.0 million decrease attributable to an increase in capitalizedas we ceased recognizing non-cash interest offset in part by a $0.9 million increase due to higher average borrowingsincome on our revolving credit facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.two third-party notes receivable.

Provision for Income Taxes

See Note 6,7, Income Taxes, to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a discussion of the changes in our effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The effective tax rate of 33.8%34.0% and 36.3%37.1% benefit on loss from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, respectively, areis based on forecasted pre-tax loss for the year adjusted for state tax, permanent differences.differences and discrete items of tax. The forecasted full year effective tax rate has been applied to the quarter-to-date and year-to-date pre-tax loss resulting in a tax benefit for the respective periods.period. Because the estimate of full-year income or loss may change from quarter to quarter, the effective tax rate for any particular quarter may not have a meaningful relationship to pre-tax income or loss for the quarter or the actual annual effective tax rate that is determined at the end of the year.


31

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Discontinued Operations

In October 2014, we completed the sale of our entire 50% ownership interest in PDCMOur deferred income tax liability at September 30, 2016 decreased $99.1 million compared to an unrelated third-party for aggregate consideration, after our share of PDCM's debt repayment and other working capital adjustments, of approximately $192 million, comprised of approximately $153 million in net cash proceeds and a promissory note due in 2020 of approximately $39 million. The transaction included the buyer's assumption of our share of the firm transportation commitment relatedDecember 31, 2015. This decrease is primarily attributable to the assets owned by PDCM, as well as our share of PDCM's natural gas hedging positions forsignificant positive net settlements from derivatives during the years 2014 through 2017. The divestiture resulted in a pre-tax gain of $76.3 million. The divestiture represented a strategic shift in our operations. Accordingly, our proportionate share of PDCM's Marcellus Shale results of operations have been separately reported as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

See Note 13, Assets Held2016 and the significant reduction in fair value of unsettled derivatives held at September 30, 2016, partially offset by the $15 million deferred tax liability for Sale, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhereequity component of the 2021 Convertible Notes issued in this report for additional information regarding the sale of our ownership interest in PDCM.

The table below presents production data related to PDCM's Marcellus Shale assets that have been divested and that are classified as discontinued operations:

  September 30, 2014
Discontinued Operations Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
Production    
Natural gas (MMcf)
 2,097.4
 6,557.9
Crude oil equivalent (MBoe)
 349.6
 1,093.0
September 2016.

Net Income (Loss)/Loss/Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
 
Net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20152016 was $23.3 million and $190.3 million compared to net loss of $41.5 million and $71.3 million compared to net income of $54.0 million and $23.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. Adjusted net loss, a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, was $75.9$5.8 million and $47.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to adjusted net loss of $5.7$75.9 million and $58.1 million for the same prior year period. Adjusted net loss was $58.1 million forperiods. The components of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to adjusted net income of $2.4 million for the same prior year period. The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year changes in net incomeloss are discussed above, with the most significantabove. These changes related to the increases in impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties, DD&A expense and commodity price risk management activity income and the decrease in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales and general and administrative expense. These same reasons for change similarly impacted adjusted net income (loss),loss, with the exception of the tax affected net change in fair value of unsettled derivatives, adjusted for taxes, as this amount is not included in the total.derivatives. See Reconciliation of Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures, below, for a more detailed discussion of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows from operating activities, our revolving credit facility, proceeds raised in debt and equity capital market transactions and asset sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, our primary sources of liquidity were the net proceeds received from the March 2016 public offering of our common stock of $296.6 million, net proceeds from the Securities Issuances of approximately $1.1 billion, and net cash flows from operating activities of $283.0 million and the proceeds received from the March 2015 public offering of our common stock of approximately $203$360.8 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds of the March 2016 common stock offering to repay all amounts then outstanding on our revolving credit facility and used the remaining amountsprincipal amount owed upon the maturity of the 2016 Convertible Notes in May 2016 and retained the remainder for general corporate purposes. The net proceeds from the Securities Issuances are expected to be used to fund a portion of our capital program.the purchase price of the Delaware Basin Acquisition (see Note 6, Pending Acquisition), to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes.

Our primary source of cash flows from operating activities is the sale of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. Fluctuations in our operating cash flows are substantially driven by commodity prices and changes in our production volumes. Commodity prices have historically been volatile and we manage this volatility through our use of derivatives.derivative instruments. We enter into commodity derivative instruments with maturities of no greater than five years from the date of the instrument. For instruments that mature in three years or less, our debt covenants restrict us from entering into hedges that would exceed 85%The revolving credit agreement imposes limits on the amount of our expected future production from total proved reserves for such related time period (proved developed producing, proved developed non-producingwe can hedge, and proved undeveloped). For instruments that mature later than three years, but no more than our designated maximum maturity, our debt covenants limit us from entering into hedges that would exceed 85% of our expected future production from proved developed producing properties during that time period. In addition, we may choose not to hedge the maximum amounts permitted under our covenants.permitted. Therefore, we may still have significant fluctuations in our cash flows from operating activities due to the remaining non-hedged portion of our future production. Given current commodity prices and our hedge position, we expect that positive net settlements on our derivative positions will continue to be a significant positive component of our 20152016 cash flows from operations. As of September 30, 2016, the fair value of our derivatives was a net asset of $33.5 million. Based on the forward pricing strip at September 30, 2016, we would expect positive net settlements totaling approximately $39.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2016. However, based upon our current hedge position and assuming current strip pricing, in 2017 and thereafter our derivatives may no longer be a significant source of cash flow, and may result in cash outflows. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, net settled derivatives comprised approximately 47% and 57%, respectively, of our cash flows from operating activities. See Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, included elsewhere in this report for additional information regarding our derivatives positions by year of maturity.

Our working capital fluctuates for various reasons, including, but not limited to, changes in the fair value of our commodity derivative instruments and changes in our cash and cash equivalents due to our practice of utilizing excess cash to reduce the outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2015, we had a working capital deficit of $9.5 million compared to a surplus of $30.3 million at December 31, 2014. The decrease in working capital to a deficit as of September 30, 2015 is primarily the result of classifying as a current liability the carrying value of the Convertible Notes, net of discount, as the stated maturity of the Convertible Notes is May 2016.


32

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

our revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2016, we had working capital of $1,148.8 million compared to $30.7 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in working capital as of September 30, 2016 is primarily the result of an increase in cash and cash equivalents related to the Securities Issuances and the repayment of the 2016 Convertible Notes in May 2016, offset in part by a decrease in the fair value of unsettled derivatives.

In recent periods, including the first nine months of 2016, we have been able to access borrowings under our revolving credit facility and to obtain proceeds from the issuance of securities. We ended September 20152016 with cash and cash equivalents of $3.7$1,197.7 million and availability under our revolving credit facility of $388.3$438.3 million, for a total liquidity position of $392.0$1,636 million, compared to $398.4$402.2 million at December 31, 2014.2015. These amounts exclude an additional $250 million available under our revolving credit facility that will be available following the closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition and may be available in other circumstances subject to certain terms and conditions of the agreement. The decreaseincrease in liquidity of $6.4$1,233.8 million, or 1.6%306.8%, was primarily attributable to capital expenditures of $489.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which2016 was financed by approximately $203 million received from the public offering of our common stock andprimarily attributable to net cash flows provided byfrom operating activities of $283.0 million. Our revised forecast estimates our adjusted$360.8 million and net cash flows from operations will rangefinancing activities of $1,284.8 million (including proceeds from $400the Securities Issuances), offset in part by cash paid for capital expenditures of $353.7 million. Our liquidity position was reduced by the cash payment of approximately $115 million to $420 millionupon the maturity of our 2016 Convertible Notes in 2015, based on estimated NYMEX crude oil and natural gas prices, before the effects of differentials or hedges, of $48.98 per barrel of crude oil, $2.87 per Mcf of natural gas and $9.61 per barrel of NGLs. Due to the derivative hedges in place as of September 30, 2015, a $10 per barrel change in the price of crude oil would change our estimated adjusted cash flows from operations for the remainder of 2015 by approximately $4 million to $8 million. Based on our current commodity mix and hedge position, we estimate that a decline in the price of natural gas will not have a material impact on our adjusted cash flows from operations in 2015.May 2016. With our current derivative position, liquidity position and expected cash flows from operations, we believe that we have sufficient capital to fund the cash portion of the purchase price for the Delaware Basin Acquisition and our development plan.planned drilling operations for the next 12 months. We cannot, however, assure sources of capital available to us in the past will be available to us in the future.

In March 2015, we filed an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC. Effective upon filing, the shelf provides for the potential sale of an unspecified amount of debt securities, common stock or preferred stock, either separately or represented by depository shares, warrants or purchase contracts, as well as units that may include any of these securities or securities of other entities. The shelf registration statement is intended to allow us to be proactive in our ability to raise capital and to have the flexibility to raise such funds in one or more offerings should we perceive market conditions to be favorable. Pursuant to this shelf registration, we sold approximately four million shares of our common stock in March 2015 in an underwritten public offering at a price to us of approximately $50.73 per share.share, approximately six million shares of our common stock in March 2016 in an underwritten public offering at a price to us of $50.11 per share and, in September 2016, approximately nine million shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price to us of $61.51 per share and $200 million principal amount of convertible notes in an underwritten offering at par.

In recent periods, including the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we have been able to access borrowings under our revolving credit facility and to obtain proceeds from the issuance of securities. We cannot, however, assure this will continue to be the case in the future. In light of recent weakened commodity prices, we continue to monitor market conditions and their potential impact on each of our revolving credit facility lenders, many of which are counterparties in our derivative transactions. Our revolving credit facility borrowing base is subject to a redetermination each May and November, based upon a quantification of our proved reserves at each June 30 and December 31, respectively. In September 2015, we completed the semi-annual redetermination of our revolving credit facility, which resulted in the reaffirmation of our borrowing base at $700 million. Further,2016, we entered into a SecondThird Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that extendedAgreement. The amendment, among other things, amends the maturity date of our revolving credit facility to permit the completion of the Delaware Basin Acquisition and, effective upon closing of the acquisition, adjusts the interest rate payable on amounts borrowed under the facility and increases the aggregate commitments under the facility from $450 million to $700 million (with the borrowing base remaining at $700 million). The maturity date of the revolving credit facility is May 2020. However, we have elected to maintain the aggregate commitment at $450 million. We had $50.0 millionno outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2015.2016. While we have added and expect to continue to add producing reserves through our drilling operations, the effect of any such reserve additions on our borrowing base could be offset by other factors including, among other things, a prolonged period of depressed commodity prices or regulatory pressure on lenders to reduce their exposure to exploration and production companies.

In October 2016, we entered into the Fourth Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The amendment, among other things, reaffirmed our borrowing base at $700 million and made certain other immaterial modifications to the existing agreement, including an increase in the amount we can hedge of our future production.
Our revolving credit facility contains financial maintenance covenants. The covenants require that we maintain: (i) total debt of less than 4.25 times the trailing 12 months earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, change in fair value of unsettled derivatives, exploration expense, gains (losses) on sales of assets and other non-cash, extraordinary or non-recurring gains (losses) ("EBITDAX") and (ii) an adjusted current ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0. Our adjusted current ratio is adjusted by eliminating the impact on our current assets and liabilities of recording the fair value of crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments. Additionally, available borrowings under our revolving credit facility are added to the current asset calculation and the current portion of our revolving credit facility debt is eliminated from the current liabilities calculation. Effective upon closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition, the maximum leverage ratio will be modified to a maximum of 4.00 to 1.00. At September 30, 2015,2016, we were in compliance with all debt covenants with a 1.62.2 times debt to EBITDAX ratio and a 1.58.9 to 1.0 current ratio. We expect to remain in compliance throughout the next year.

The indentureindentures governing our 7.75% senior notes due2024 Senior Notes and 2022 containsSenior Notes contain customary restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to: (a) incur additional debt, (b) make certain investments or pay dividends or distributions on our capital stock or purchase, redeem or retire capital stock, (c) sell assets, including capital stock of our restricted subsidiaries, (d) restrict the payment of dividends or other payments by restricted subsidiaries to us, (e) create liens that secure debt, (f) enter into transactions with affiliates and (g) merge or consolidate with another company. At September 30, 2015,2016, we were in compliance with all covenants and expect to remain in compliance throughout the next year.

The conversion rights on our Convertible Notes could be triggered prior to the maturity date. We have currently elected a net-settlement method to satisfy our conversion obligation, which allows us to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash and to settle the excess conversion value in shares, as well as cash in lieu of fractional shares. In the event that a holder elects to convert its note, we expect to fund the cash settlement of any such conversion from working capital and/or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The conversion right is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position. The Convertible Notes were not convertible at the option of holders as of the date of this filing.

See Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, for our discussion of credit risk.


33

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities.Our net cash flows from operating activities are primarily impacted by commodity prices, production volumes, net settlements from our derivative positions, operating costs and general and administrative expenses. Cash flows from operating activities increased by $81.0$77.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was2015, primarily due to the increaseincreases in natural gas and NGLs sales of $52.5 million, net settlements from our derivative positions of $183.9$5.4 million and a decrease in general and administrative expense of $40.7 million. The increase was partially offset by the decrease in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales
Table of $96.1 million,contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

the increase in changes in assets and liabilities of $32.3$45.2 million related to the timing of cash payments and receiptsreceipts. These increases were offset in part by increases in general and a $9.6administrative expenses of $16.8 million, decrease in cash flows from discontinued operating activities.transportation, gathering and processing expenses of $7 million and production taxes of $6.5 million. The key components for the changes in our cash flows provided by operating activities are described in more detail in Results of Operationsabove.

Adjusted cash flows from operations, a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, increased $113.4$32.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The increase was primarily due to the same factors mentioned above for changes in cash flows provided by operating activities, without regard to timing of cash payments and receipts of assets and liabilities. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, increaseddecreased by $109.8$16.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. The increasedecrease was primarily the result of the increase in net settlements from our derivative positionsrecording a provision for uncollectible notes receivable of $183.9$44 million and a decreasethe increases in transportation, gathering and processing expenses of $7 million, production taxes of $6.5 million and general and administrative expense of $40.7 million. The increase was partially$16.8 million, offset in part by the decreaseincreases in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales of $96.1$52.5 million a $12.6 million decrease in contribution marginsand net settlements from discontinued operations and a $6.5 million increase in production costs.our derivative positions of $5.4 million. See Reconciliation of Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures, below, for a more detailed discussion of non-U.S. GAAP financial measures.

Investing Activities. Because crude oil and natural gas production from a well declines rapidly in the first few years of production, we need to continue to commit significant amounts of capital in order to maintain and grow our production and replace our reserves. If capital is not available or is constrained in the future, we will be limited to our cash flows from operations and liquidity under our revolving credit facility as the sources for funding our capital expenditures. We would not be able to maintain our current level of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production and cash flows from operating activities if capital markets were unavailable, commodity prices were to become depressed for a prolonged period and/or the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility was significantly reduced. The occurrence of such an event may result in our election to defer a substantial portion of our planned capital expenditures and could have a material negative impact on our operations in the future.

Cash flows from investing activities primarily consist of the acquisition, exploration and development of crude oil and natural gas properties, net of dispositions of crude oil and natural gas properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our drilling program consisted of five drilling rigs operating in the horizontal Niobrara and Codell plays in our Wattenberg Field. Net cash used in investing activities of $488.7$448.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 was primarily related to cash utilized for our drilling operations. Duringoperations, including completion activities of $353.7 million and a $100 million deposit toward the third quartercash portion of 2015, our cash flows from operations approximated our cash flows from investing activities and we expect the same forpurchase price of the remainder of 2015.Delaware Basin Acquisition.

Financing Activities. Net cash from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 increased by approximately $120.3$1,091.5 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015. Net cash from financing activities of $193.3$1,284.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 was primarily related to the $202.9$855.1 million received from the issuanceissuances of our common stock, in March 2015,$392.3 million of proceeds from issuance of the 2024 Senior Notes and $194 million of proceeds from issuance of the 2021 Convertible Notes, partially offset by the $115 million payment of principal amounts owed upon the maturity of the 2016 Convertible Notes and net payments of approximately $6.0$37 million to pay down amounts borrowed under our revolving credit facility.

Drilling Activity
 
The following table presents our net developmental drilling activity for the periods shown. Productive wells consist of wells spud, turned-in-line and producing during the period. In-process wells represent wells that have been spud, drilled or are waiting to be completed and/or for gas pipeline connection during the period.

  Net Drilling Activity
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2016 2015 2016 2015
Operating Region/Area Productive In-Process Dry (1) Productive In-Process Dry (1) Productive In-Process Dry (1) Productive In-Process Dry (1)
Development Wells                        
Wattenberg Field, operated wells 34.7 40.1  26.5 52.8 1.1 87.4
 40.1
 0.4 75.0
 52.8
 2.1
Wattenberg Field, non-operated wells 1.8 2.2  1.2 4.9  5.0
 2.2
  5.4
 4.9
 
Utica Shale  1.7     2.8
 1.7
  3.0
 
 
Total drilling activity 36.5 44.0  27.7 57.7 1.1 95.2
 44.0
 0.4
 83.4
 57.7
 2.1
  Net Drilling Activity
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2015 2014 2015 2014
Operating Region/Area Productive In-Process Dry (1) Productive In-Process Productive In-Process Dry (1) Productive In-Process Dry (1)
Development Wells                      
Wattenberg Field 27.7 57.7 1.1 12.1 48.9 80.4
 57.7
 2.1
 48.3
 48.9
 1.7
Utica Shale    2.0 3.7 3.0
 
 
 4.0
 3.7
 1.0
Marcellus Shale (2)      
 
 
 2.0
 
 
Total drilling activity 27.7 57.7 1.1 14.1 52.6 83.4
 57.7
 2.1
 54.3
 52.6
 2.7
______________
(1) Represents mechanical failures that resulted in the plugging and abandonment of the respective wells.
(2) Represents PDCM's drilling activity. On October 14, 2014, we closed the sale of our entire 50% ownership interest in PDCM to an unrelated third-party. See Note 13, Assets Held for Sale, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information.

34

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 20152016, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under SEC rules, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Table of contents


Commitments and Contingencies

See Note 10,11, Commitments and Contingencies, to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Recent Accounting Standards

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP required management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses.

There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates or in the underlying accounting assumptions and estimates used in these critical accounting policies from those disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in our 20142015 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2015.22, 2016.

Reconciliation of Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures

We use "adjusted cash flows from operations," "adjusted net income (loss)" and "adjusted EBITDA," non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, for internal management reporting, when evaluating period-to-period changes and, in some cases, providing public guidance on possible future results. These measures are not measures of financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, net income (loss) or cash flows from operations, investing or financing activities, and should not be viewed as liquidity measures or indicators of cash flows reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The non-U.S. GAAP financial measures that we use may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Also, in the future, we may disclose different non-U.S. GAAP financial measures in order to help our investors more meaningfully evaluate and compare our future results of operations to our previously reported results of operations. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial statements and publicly filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.

Adjusted cash flows from operations. We define adjusted cash flows from operations as the cash flows earned or incurred from operating activities, without regard to changes in operating assets and liabilities. We believe it is important to consider adjusted cash flows from operations, as well as cash flows from operations, as we believe it often provides more transparency into what drives the changes in our operating trends, such as production, prices, operating costs and related operational factors, without regard to whether the related asset or liability was received or paid during the same period. We also use this measure because the timing of cash received from our assets, cash paid to obtain an asset or payment of our obligations has been only a timing issue from one period to the next as we have not had significant accounts receivable collection problems, nor been unable to purchase assets or pay our obligations. See the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Adjusted net income (loss). We define adjusted net income (loss) as net income (loss), plus loss on commodity derivatives, less gain on commodity derivatives and net settlements on commodity derivatives, each adjusted for tax effect. We believe it is important to consider adjusted net income (loss), as well as net income (loss). We believe this measure often provides more transparency into our operating trends, such as production, prices, operating costs, net settlements from derivatives and related factors, without regard to changes in our net income (loss) from our mark-to-market adjustments resulting from net changes in the fair value of unsettled derivatives. Additionally, other items which are not indicative of future results may be excluded to clearly identify operating trends.

Adjusted EBITDA. We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), plus loss on commodity derivatives, interest expense, net of interest income, income taxes, impairment of crude oilproperties and natural gas properties,equipment, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and accretion of asset retirement obligations, less gain on commodity derivatives and net settlements on commodity derivatives. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, net income (loss), and should not be considered an indicator of cash flows reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA includes certain non-cash costs incurred by the Company and does not take into account changes in operating assets and liabilities. Other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. We believe adjusted EBITDA is relevant because it is a measure of our operational and financial performance, as well as a measure of our liquidity, and is used by our management, investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others to analyze such things as:

operating performance and return on capital as compared to our peers;
financial performance of our assets and our valuation without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt obligations; and
the viability of acquisition opportunities and capital expenditure projects, including the related rate of return.

35

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.


The following table presents a reconciliation of each of our non-U.S. GAAP financial measures to its most comparable U.S. GAAP measure:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015 2014 2015 20142016 2015 2016 2015
(in millions)(in millions)
Adjusted cash flows from operations:              
Adjusted cash flows from operations$122.7
 $55.5
 $293.6
 $180.2
$122.6
 $122.7
 $326.2
 $293.6
Changes in assets and liabilities13.8
 14.9
 (10.6) 21.8
40.4
 13.8
 34.6
 (10.6)
Net cash from operating activities$136.5
 $70.4
 $283.0
 $202.0
$163.0
 $136.5
 $360.8
 $283.0
              
Adjusted net income (loss):       
Adjusted net income (loss)$(75.9) $(5.7) $(58.1) $2.4
Gain on commodity derivative instruments123.5
 92.2
 141.2
 11.6
Adjusted net loss:       
Adjusted net loss$(5.8) $(75.9) $(47.7) $(58.1)
Gain (loss) on commodity derivative instruments19.4
 123.5
 (62.3) 141.2
Net settlements on commodity derivative instruments(68.0) 4.1
 (162.5) 22.7
(47.7) (68.0) (167.9) (162.5)
Tax effect of above adjustments(21.1) (36.6) 8.1
 (13.0)10.8
 (21.1) 87.6
 8.1
Net income (loss)$(41.5) $54.0
 $(71.3) $23.7
Net loss$(23.3) $(41.5) $(190.3) $(71.3)
              
Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):       
Adjusted EBITDA to net loss:       
Adjusted EBITDA$128.6
 $62.6
 $311.6
 $201.8
$128.7
 $129.1
 $297.4
 $314.0
Gain on commodity derivative instruments123.5
 92.2
 141.2
 11.6
Gain (loss) on commodity derivative instruments19.4
 123.5
 (62.3) 141.2
Net settlements on commodity derivative instruments(68.0) 4.1
 (162.5) 22.7
(47.7) (68.0) (167.9) (162.5)
Interest expense, net(10.7) (12.4) (31.8) (37.9)(20.1) (10.7) (40.9) (31.8)
Income tax provision21.2
 (38.5) 40.6
 (16.6)12.0
 21.2
 112.2
 40.6
Impairment of crude oil and natural gas properties(153.5) (2.2) (158.8) (4.0)
Impairment of properties and equipment(0.9) (154.0) (6.1) (161.2)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(81.0) (50.9) (206.9) (151.3)(112.9) (81.0) (317.3) (206.9)
Accretion of asset retirement obligations(1.6) (0.9) (4.7) (2.6)(1.8) (1.6) (5.4) (4.7)
Net income (loss)$(41.5) $54.0
 $(71.3) $23.7
Net loss$(23.3) $(41.5) $(190.3) $(71.3)
              
Adjusted EBITDA to net cash from operating activities:              
Adjusted EBITDA$128.6
 $62.6
 $311.6
 $201.8
$128.7
 $129.1
 $297.4
 $314.0
Interest expense, net(10.7) (12.4) (31.8) (37.9)(20.1) (10.7) (40.9) (31.8)
Stock-based compensation4.8
 4.2
 14.3
 13.1
4.1
 4.8
 15.2
 14.3
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs1.8
 1.8
 5.3
 5.2
9.9
 1.8
 12.9
 5.3
(Gain) loss on sale of properties and equipment(0.1) 
 (0.3) 0.4
Gain on sale of properties and equipment(0.2) (0.1) 
 (0.3)
Other(1.7) (0.7) (5.5) (2.4)0.2
 (2.2) 41.6
 (7.9)
Changes in assets and liabilities13.8
 14.9
 (10.6) 21.8
40.4
 13.8
 34.6
 (10.6)
Net cash from operating activities$136.5
 $70.4
 $283.0
 $202.0
$163.0
 $136.5
 $360.8
 $283.0

Amounts above include results from continuing and discontinued operations.

36

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management

We are exposed to market risks associated with interest rate risks, commodity price risk and credit risk. We have established risk management processes to monitor and manage these market risks.

Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates affect the amount of interest we earn on our interest bearing cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash accounts and the interest we pay on borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our 7.75% senior notes due2021 Convertible Notes, 2024 Senior Notes and 2022 and our ConvertibleSenior Notes have fixed rates, and therefore near-term changes in interest rates do not expose us to risk of earnings or cash flow loss; however, near-term changes in interest rates may affect the fair value of our fixed-rate debt.

As of September 30, 20152016, our interest-bearing deposit accounts included money market accounts, certificates of deposit and checking and savings accounts with various banks. The amount of our interest-bearing cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of September 30, 20152016 was $0.7$1,167 million with an averagea weighted-average interest rate of 0.1%0.3%. Based on a sensitivity analysis of our interest bearinginterest-bearing deposits as of September 30, 20152016, it was estimated and assuming we had $1,167 million outstanding throughout the period, we estimate that if marketa 1% increase in interest rates would have increased 1%, the impact on interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 20152016 would have been insignificant.by approximately $8.7 million.

As of September 30, 20152016, excluding the $11.7 million irrevocable standby letter of credit, we had a $50.0 millionno outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility. It was estimated that if market interest rates would have increased or decreased 1%, our interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 would have changed by approximately $0.4 million.
    
Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to the potential risk of loss from adverse changes in the market price of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. Pursuant to established policies and procedures, we manage a portion of the risks associated with these market fluctuations using derivative instruments. These instruments help us predict with greater certainty the effective crude oil and natural gas prices we will receive for our hedged production. We believe that our derivative policies and procedures are effective in achieving our risk management objectives.
 
The following table presents our derivative positions related to crude oil and natural gas sales in effect as of September 30, 20152016:
 Collars Fixed-Price Swaps Basis Protection Swaps   Collars Fixed-Price Swaps Basis Protection Swaps  
Commodity/ Index/
Maturity Period
 
Quantity
(Gas -
BBtu (1) 
Oil - MBbls)
 
Weighted-Average
Contract Price
 
Quantity
(Gas -
BBtu (1) 
Oil - MBbls)
 
Weighted-
Average
Contract
Price
 
Quantity
(BBtu) (1)
 
Weighted-
Average
Contract
Price
 
Fair Value
September 30,
2015 (2)
(in millions)
 
Quantity
(Gas -
BBtu (1) 
Oil - MBbls)
 
Weighted-Average
Contract Price
 
Quantity
(Gas -
BBtu (1) 
Oil - MBbls)
 
Weighted-
Average
Contract
Price
 
Quantity
(BBtu) (1)
 
Weighted-
Average
Contract
Price
 
Fair Value
September 30,
2016 (2)
(in millions)
 Floors Ceilings   Floors Ceilings 
Natural Gas                                
NYMEX                                
2015 2,830.0
 $3.92
 $4.30
 2,970.0
 $3.98
 4,800.0
 $(0.29) $7.1
2016 7,820.0
 3.88
 4.24
 21,930.0
 3.93
 22,800.0
 (0.30) 31.5
 900.0
 $3.75
 $4.04
 7,805.0
 $3.67
 8,403.2
 $(0.27) $5.3
2017 7,920.0
 3.59
 4.13
 23,090.0
 3.67
 9,600.0
 (0.29) 20.7
 7,920.0
 3.59
 4.13
 27,290.0
 3.55
 12,000.0
 (0.28) 17.0
2018 1,230.0
 3.00
 3.67
 4,830.0
 3.37
 
 
 1.7
 1,230.0
 3.00
 3.67
 45,280.0
 2.94
 16,200.0
 (0.28) 2.4
                
CIG                
2015 
 
 
 556.0
 4.02
 
 
 0.9
                                
Total Natural Gas 19,800.0
     53,376.0
   37,200.0
   61.9
 10,050.0
     80,375.0
   36,603.2
   24.7
                                
Crude Oil                                
NYMEX                                
2015 234.0
 86.79
 96.63
 1,187.0
 89.42
 
 
 61.1
2016 1,740.0
 77.59
 97.55
 2,400.0
 90.37
 
 
 147.4
 435.0
 77.59
 97.55
 930.0
 72.21
 
 
 34.0
2017 960.0
 54.06
 73.77
 180.0
 61.15
 
 
 7.8
 1,464.0
 49.22
 65.95
 3,004.0
 44.92
 
 
 (15.1)
2018 1,512.0
 41.85
 54.31
 1,512.0
 51.06
 
 
 (10.1)
     
               
          
Total Crude Oil 2,934.0
     3,767.0
   
   216.3
 3,411.0
     5,446.0
   
   8.8
Total Natural Gas and Crude Oil               $278.2
               $33.5
                                
____________
(1)A standard unit of measurement for natural gas (one BBtu equals one MMcf).
(2)Approximately 29.9%33.1% of the fair value of our derivative assets and 19.2% of the fair value of our derivative liabilities were measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). See Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

37

PDC ENERGY, INC.


The following table presents average NYMEX and CIG closing prices for crude oil and natural gas for the periods identified, as well as average sales prices we realized for our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Year EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended Year Ended
September 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014September 30, 2016 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Average Index Closing Price:          
Crude oil (per Bbl)          
NYMEX$46.43
 $51.00
 $92.91
$44.94
 $41.33
 $48.80
Natural gas (per MMBtu)          
NYMEX$2.77
 $2.80
 $4.42
$2.81
 $2.29
 $2.66
CIG2.52
 2.54
 4.17
2.47
 1.98
 2.44
TETCO M-2 (1)1.21
 1.55
 3.35
1.47
 1.31
 1.49
          
Average Sales Price Realized:          
Excluding net settlements on derivatives          
Crude oil (per Bbl)$38.98
 $42.22
 $80.67
$42.11
 $37.33
 $40.14
Natural gas (per Mcf)2.05
 2.15
 3.87
2.04
 1.62
 2.04
NGLs (per Bbl)9.40
 10.45
 27.39
11.12
 10.41
 10.72
_____________
(1) TETCO M-2 is an index price upon which a majority of our natural gas produced in the Utica Shale is sold.

Based on a sensitivity analysis as of September 30, 20152016, it was estimatedwe estimate that a 10% increase in natural gas and crude oil prices, inclusive of basis, over the entire period for which we have derivatives in place, would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of our derivative positions of $49.4$80.3 million, whereas a 10% decrease in prices would have resulted in an increase in fair value of $50.0$80.3 million.

See Note 3, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, and Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a summary of our open derivative positions, as well as a discussion of how we determine the fair value of and account for our derivative contracts.

Credit Risk

Credit risk represents the loss that we would incur if a counterparty fails to perform under its contractual obligations. We attempt to reduce credit risk by diversifying our counterparty exposure and entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. When exposed to significant credit risk, we analyze the counterparties’counterparty’s financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establish credit limits and monitor the appropriateness of those limits on an ongoing basis. We monitor the creditworthiness of significant counterparties through our credit committee, which utilizes a number of qualitative and quantitative tools to assess credit risk and takes mitigative actions if deemed necessary. While we believe that our credit risk analysis and monitoring procedures are reasonable, no amount of analysis can assure performance by our counterparties.

Our Oil and Gas Exploration and Production segment's crude oil, natural gas and NGLs sales are concentrated with a few predominately large customers. This concentrates our credit risk exposure with a small number of large customers. Amounts due to our Gas Marketing segment are from a diverse group of entities, including major upstream and midstream energy companies, financial institutions and end-users in various industries. As commoditynatural gas prices continue to remain depressed, certain customersthird-party producers under our Gas Marketing segment have begun and will continue to experience financial distress, which has led to certain contractual defaults. Todefaults and litigation; however, to date, we have had no material counterparty default losseslosses. We have initiated several legal actions for breach of contract, collection and related claims against certain third-party producers that are delinquent in their payment obligations, which have to date resulted in one default judgment. We expect this trend to continue for this segment.

A group of 42 independent West Virginia natural gas producers has filed a lawsuit in Marshall County, West Virginia, naming Dominion, certain entities affiliated with Dominion, and RNG as defendants, alleging various contractual, fiduciary and related claims against the defendants, all of which are associated with firm transportation contracts entered into by plaintiffs and relating to customers in either segment.pipelines owned and operated by Dominion and its affiliates. RNG and Dominion have removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia and are preparing pre-trial pleadings, including an answer to the compliant and a motion to dismiss the case. At this time, RNG is unable to estimate any potential damages associated with the claims, but believes the complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously pursue its defense.

We primarily use financial institutions which are lenders in our revolving credit facility as counterparties for our derivative financial instruments. Disruption in the credit markets, changes in commodity prices and other factors may have a significant adverse impact on a number of financial institutions. To date, we have had no material counterparty default losses from our derivative financial instruments. See Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more detail on our derivative financial instruments.

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

Disclosure of Limitations

Because the information above included only those exposures that existed at September 30, 20152016, it does not consider those exposures or positions which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate and commodity price fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our commodity price risk management strategies at the time, and interest rates and commodity prices at the time.


38

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 20152016, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the ChiefPrincipal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).

Based on the results of this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the ChiefPrincipal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 20152016.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the three months ended September 30, 20152016, we made no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information regarding our legal proceedings can be found in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We face many risks. Factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or liquidity and the trading price of our common stock are described under Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our 20142015 Form 10-K. This information should be considered carefully, together with other information in this report and other reports and materials we file with the SEC.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2015 Form 10-K, except for the following:

If completed, the Delaware Basin Acquisition may not achieve its intended results and may result in us assuming unanticipated liabilities. To date, we have conducted only limited diligence regarding the assets and liabilities we would assume in the transaction.

We entered into the Delaware Basin Acquisition agreements with the expectation that the acquisition would result in various benefits, growth opportunities and synergies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the transaction is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. For example, under the acquisition agreements, we have the opportunity to conduct customary environmental and title due diligence following the execution of the agreements, but our diligence efforts to date have been limited. As a result, we may discover title defects or adverse environmental or other conditions of which we are currently unaware. Environmental, title and other problems could reduce the value of the properties to us, and, depending on the circumstances, we could have limited or no recourse to the sellers with respect to those problems. We would assume substantially all of the liabilities associated with the acquired properties and would be entitled to indemnification in connection with those liabilities in only limited circumstances and in limited amounts. We cannot assure you that such potential remedies will be adequate for any liabilities we incur, and such liabilities could be significant. In addition, certain of the properties to be acquired are subject to consents to assign and preference rights. If all applicable waivers cannot be obtained, we may not be able to acquire certain properties as originally contemplated and our expected benefits of the acquisition may be adversely affected. Further, the acquisition agreements allow the sellers to include a specified amount of additional leases in the transaction, which would increase the purchase price. Also, it is uncertain whether our existing operations and the acquired properties and assets can be integrated in an efficient and effective manner.

As with other acquisitions, the success of the Delaware Basin Acquisition depends on, among other things, the accuracy of our assessment of the reserves and drilling locations associated with the acquired properties, future oil, NGL and natural gas prices and operating costs and various other factors. These assessments are necessarily inexact. As a result, we may not recover the purchase price for the acquisition from the sale of production from the property or recognize an acceptable return from such sales. See "-Risks Related to Our Business and the Industry-Acquisitions of properties are subject to the uncertainties of evaluating recoverable reserves and potential liabilities, including environmental uncertainties" in our 2015 Form 10-K. Although the properties to be acquired are subject to many of the risks and uncertainties to which our business and operations are subject, risks associated with the Delaware Basin Acquisition in particular include those associated with our ability to operate efficiently in an area where we have no current operations, the significant size of the transaction relative to our existing operations, the fact that a substantial majority of the properties to be acquired are undeveloped and the additional indebtedness we have incurred in connection with the acquisition. We also expect that pursuing our future development plans for the properties to be acquired will require
Table of contents


capital in excess of our projected cash flows from operations for some period of time beginning in 2017, which may increase our need for external financing.

In addition, the integration of operations following the Delaware Basin Acquisition will require substantial attention from our management and other personnel, which may distract their attention from our day-to-day business and operations and prevent us from realizing benefits from other opportunities. Completing the integration process may be more expensive than anticipated, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to effect the integration of these operations smoothly or efficiently or that the anticipated benefits of the transaction will be achieved.

The reserves, production and drilling locations estimates with respect to the properties to be acquired in the Delaware Basin Acquisition may differ materially from the actual amounts.

The reserves, production and drilling locations estimates with respect to the properties to be acquired in the Delaware Basin Acquisition are based on our analysis of historical production data, assumptions regarding capital expenditures and anticipated production declines. Such analysis is based, in significant part, on data provided by the sellers. We cannot assure you that these estimates are accurate. After such data is further reviewed by us and our independent engineers, the actual reserves, production and number of viable drilling locations may differ materially from our expectations.

We have incurred significant transaction-related costs in connection with the Delaware Basin Acquisition and the related financing transactions.

We have incurred a number of significant transaction-related costs associated with the Delaware Basin Acquisition and the related financing transactions. We continue to assess the magnitude of these costs and additional unanticipated costs, including costs incurred in the integration of the properties to be acquired, which may be significant.

Failure to complete the Delaware Basin Acquisition could negatively affect our stock price as well as our business and financial results.

Closing of the Delaware Basin Acquisition is subject to a number of conditions. If the Delaware Basin Acquisition is not completed, we will be subject to a number of risks, including but not limited to the following:

We must pay costs related to the acquisition including, among others, legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, whether the acquisition is completed or not.

In some circumstances set forth in the acquisition agreements, we could be required to forfeit the $100 million aggregate deposit we made at the time the agreements were executed.

We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets.

We could be subject to litigation related to the failure to complete the acquisition.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
    
    
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Period Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) Average Price Paid per Share
     
July 1 - 31, 2015 15,237
 $51.36
August 1 - 31, 2015 330
 46.95
September 1 - 30, 2015 
 
Total third quarter purchases 15,567
 51.27
     
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) Average Price Paid per Share
     
July 1 - 31, 2016 19,261
 $54.38
August 1 - 31, 2016 440
 55.48
September 1 - 30, 2016 
 
Total third quarter purchases 19,701
 54.40
     
__________
(1)Purchases primarily represent shares purchased from employees for the payment of their tax liabilities related to the vesting of securities issued pursuant to our stock-based compensation plans.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES - None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES - Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION - None.


39

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit Number  Exhibit Description Form  SEC File Number  Exhibit Filing Date  Filed Herewith
             
10.1 Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 30, 2015, among PDC Energy, Inc. as the Borrower, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. 8-K 001-37419
 10.1 10/2/2015  
             
10.2* Retirement Agreement with Gysle R. Shellum, Chief Financial Officer, dated October, 26, 2015. 8-K 000-07246 10.1 10/27/2015  
             
31.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act Rules, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
             
31.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act Rules, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
             
32.1** Certifications by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.          
             
99.1 Certificate of Conversion, effective June 5, 2015. 8-K12B 000-07246 99.1 6/8/2015  
             
99.2 Articles of Conversion, effective June 5, 2015. 8-K12B 000-07246 99.2 6/8/2015  
             
101.INS XBRL Instance Document         X
             
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document         X
             
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document         X
             
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document         X
             
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document         X
             
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document         X
             
*Management contract or compensatory arrangement.
** Furnished herewith.
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFormSEC File NumberExhibitFiling DateFiled Herewith
31.1Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act Rules, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.X
31.2Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act Rules, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.X
32.1**Certifications by Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1Fourth Amendment to Third Amendment and Restated Credit AgreementX
101.INSXBRL Instance DocumentX
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentX
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentX
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX
*Management contract or compensatory arrangement.
** Furnished herewith.

40

Table of contents
PDC ENERGY, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 PDC Energy, Inc.
 (Registrant)
  
  
  
  
Date: November 5, 20153, 2016/s/ Barton R. Brookman
 Barton R. Brookman
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (principal executive officer)
  
 /s/ Gysle R. Shellum
Gysle R. Shellum
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
/s/ R. Scott Meyers
 R. Scott Meyers
 Chief Accounting Officer
 (principal accountingfinancial officer)

4145