UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)  
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016 

OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to 


Commission File Number 001-07572
PVH CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 13-1166910
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
  
200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 381-3500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  x     Accelerated filer  o     Non-accelerated filer  o     Smaller reporting company  o
(do not check if a smaller
reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of outstanding shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the registrant as of August 28, 2015
26, 2016 was 82,543,14780,228,987.




PVH CORP.
INDEX
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995: Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q including, without limitation, statements relating to our future revenue, earnings and cash flows, plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy, and some of which might not be anticipated, including, without limitation, (i) our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are subject to change at any time at our discretion; (ii) we may be considered to be highly leveraged and we use a significant portion of our cash flows to service our indebtedness, as a result of which we might not have sufficient funds to operate our businesses in the manner we intend or have operated in the past; (iii) the levels of sales of our apparel, footwear and related products, both to our wholesale customers and in our retail stores, the levels of sales of our licensees at wholesale and retail, and the extent of discounts and promotional pricing in which we and our licensees and other business partners are required to engage, all of which can be affected by weather conditions, changes in the economy, fuel prices, reductions in travel, fashion trends, consolidations, repositionings and bankruptcies in the retail industries, repositionings of brands by our licensors and other factors; (iv) our plans and results of operations will be affected by our ability to manage our growth and inventory, including our ability to realize benefits from our acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”)acquisitions; (v) our operations and results could be affected by quota restrictions and the imposition of safeguard controls (which, among other things, could limit our ability to produce products in cost-effective countries that have the labor and technical expertise needed), the availability and cost of raw materials, our ability to adjust timely to changes in trade regulations and the migration and development of manufacturers (which can affect where our products can best be produced), changes in available factory and shipping capacity, wage and shipping cost escalation, and civil conflict, war or terrorist acts, the threat of any of the foregoing, or political and labor instability in any of the countries where our or our licensees’ or other business partners’ products are sold, produced or are planned to be sold or produced; (vi) disease epidemics and health related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas, as well as reduced consumer traffic and purchasing, as consumers become ill or limit or cease shopping in order to avoid exposure; (vii) acquisitions and divestitures and issues arising with acquisitions, divestitures and proposed transactions, including, without limitation, the ability to integrate an acquired entity such as Warnaco,or business into us with no substantial adverse effect on the acquired entity’s, the acquired business’s or our existing operations, employee relationships, vendor relationships, customer relationships or financial performance;performance, and the disposal of the net assets of a divested entity; (viii) the failure of our licensees to market successfully licensed products or to preserve the value of our brands, or their misuse of our brands; (ix) our results could be adversely affected by the strengthening of the United States dollar against foreign currencies in which we transact significant levels of business; (x) our retirement plan expenses recorded throughout the year are calculated using actuarial valuations that incorporate assumptions and (ix) estimates about financial market, economic and demographic conditions, and differences between estimated and actual results give rise to gains and losses that are recorded immediately in earnings, generally in the fourth quarter of the year; and (xi) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement, including, without limitation, any estimate regarding
revenue, earnings or cash flows, whether as a result of the receipt of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise.
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements
Consolidated Income Statements for the Thirteen and Twenty-Six Weeks Ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014
1
  
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income for the Thirteen and Twenty-Six Weeks Ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014
2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2016, January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 February 1, 2015 and August 3, 2014
3
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014
4
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
  
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
3233
  
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
4447
  
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
4448
  



PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings
4649
  
Item 1A - Risk Factors
4649
  
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
4649
  
Item 6 - Exhibits
4750
  
Signatures
5053




PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PVH Corp.
Consolidated Income Statements
Unaudited
(In millions, except per share data)

Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
August 2, August 3, August 2, August 3,July 31, August 2, July 31, August 2,
2015 2014 2015 20142016 2015 2016 2015
Net sales $1,765.9
 $1,890.5
 $3,551.0
 $3,762.0
$1,845.4
 $1,765.9
 $3,663.1
 $3,551.0
Royalty revenue 75.4
 65.3
 149.6
 134.7
69.9
 75.4
 147.0
 149.6
Advertising and other revenue 22.7
 19.8
 42.7
 42.6
18.0
 22.7
 41.0
 42.7
Total revenue 1,864.0
 1,975.6
 3,743.3
 3,939.3
1,933.3
 1,864.0
 3,851.1
 3,743.3
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)861.9
 920.9
 1,755.6
 1,851.4
899.5
 861.9
 1,810.4
 1,755.6
Gross profit 1,002.1
 1,054.7
 1,987.7
 2,087.9
1,033.8
 1,002.1
 2,040.7
 1,987.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses 850.5
 895.8
 1,665.4
 1,754.9
874.7
 850.5
 1,739.9
 1,665.4
Debt modification and extinguishment costs—
 —
 —
 93.1
15.8
 —
 15.8
 —
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates2.5
 0.4
 8.6
 3.9
Gain to write-up equity investment in joint venture to fair value—
 —
 153.1
 —
Equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates(0.3) 2.5
 (0.5) 8.6
Income before interest and taxes154.1
 159.3
 330.9
 243.8
143.0
 154.1
 437.6
 330.9
Interest expense 29.2
 35.0
 60.1
 77.1
29.2
 29.2
 59.1
 60.1
Interest income 1.2
 1.2
 2.3
 2.7
1.1
 1.2
 2.0
 2.3
Income before taxes126.1
 125.5
 273.1
 169.4
114.9
 126.1
 380.5
 273.1
Income tax expense (benefit)23.9
 (1.0) 56.8
 7.7
Income tax expense24.4
 23.9
 58.4
 56.8
Net income102.2
 126.5
 216.3
 161.7
90.5
 102.2
 322.1
 216.3
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest—
 —
 —
 (0.1)—
 —
 —
 —
Net income attributable to PVH Corp.$102.2
 $126.5
 $216.3
 $161.8
$90.5
 $102.2
 $322.1
 $216.3
Basic net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.$1.24
 $1.54
 $2.62
 $1.97
$1.12
 $1.24
 $3.98
 $2.62
Diluted net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.$1.22
 $1.52
 $2.59
 $1.94
$1.11
 $1.22
 $3.95
 $2.59
Dividends declared per common share $0.0375
 $0.0750
 $0.1125
 $0.1125
$0.0375
 $0.0375
 $0.1125
 $0.1125

See accompanying notes.

1



PVH Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income
Unaudited
(In millions)


 Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
 August 2, August 3, August 2, August 3,
 2015 2014 2015 2014
        
Net income$102.2
 $126.5
 $216.3
 $161.7
Other comprehensive (loss) income:       
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(0.4); $0.0; $(0.4) and $(3.3)(124.8) (99.3) (140.1) 10.2
Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax (benefit) of $(0.1); $(0.1); $(0.1) and $(0.2)(0.0) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Net unrealized and realized (loss) gain on effective hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0.4; $0.1; $(0.5) and $(0.0)(6.3) 15.5
 (23.2) 8.0
Comprehensive (loss) income(28.9) 42.6
 52.9
 179.7
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest—
 —
 —
 0.5
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to PVH Corp.$(28.9) $42.6
 $52.9
 $179.2
 Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
 July 31, August 2, July 31, August 2,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
        
Net income$90.5
 $102.2
 $322.1
 $216.3
Other comprehensive (loss) income:       
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit of $(0.1); $(0.4); $(0.1) and $(0.4)(99.6) (124.8) 84.7
 (140.1)
Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax benefit of $(0.1); $(0.1); $(0.1) and $(0.1)(0.0) (0.0) (0.1) (0.1)
Net unrealized and realized gain (loss) related to effective cash flow hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $2.1; $0.4; $(3.8) and $(0.5)16.9
 (6.3) (38.0) (23.2)
Net gain on net investment hedge, net of tax expense of $2.9, $0.0, $2.9 and $0.04.9
 —
 4.9
 —
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(77.8) (131.1) 51.5
 (163.4)
Comprehensive income (loss)12.7
 (28.9) 373.6
 52.9
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest—
 —
 —
 —
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to PVH Corp.$12.7
 $(28.9) $373.6
 $52.9

See accompanying notes.


2



PVH Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share data)
August 2, February 1, August 3,July 31, January 31, August 2,
2015 2015 20142016 2016 2015
UNAUDITED AUDITED UNAUDITEDUNAUDITED AUDITED UNAUDITED
ASSETS          
Current Assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents $466.7
 $479.3
 $461.1
$741.7
 $556.4
 $466.7
Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $18.8, $19.0 and $21.9590.2
 705.7
 730.1
Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $15.4, $18.1 and $18.8569.6
 657.2
 590.2
Other receivables 27.6
 37.5
 37.2
24.7
 28.7
 27.6
Inventories, net 1,402.6
 1,257.3
 1,365.4
1,412.1
 1,322.3
 1,402.6
Prepaid expenses 155.2
 141.1
 185.7
156.0
 150.5
 147.1
Other, including deferred taxes of $96.0, $115.4 and $158.8177.5
 280.3
 215.0
Other34.9
 89.4
 81.5
Total Current Assets2,819.8
 2,901.2
 2,994.5
2,939.0
 2,804.5
 2,715.7
Property, Plant and Equipment, net708.9
 725.7
 703.6
736.0
 744.6
 708.9
Goodwill 3,220.2
 3,259.1
 3,530.3
3,536.1
 3,219.3
 3,220.2
Tradenames 2,806.4
 2,833.4
 3,000.6
2,818.0
 2,802.6
 2,806.4
Other Intangibles, net894.2
 948.2
 1,027.9
934.0
 843.8
 894.2
Other Assets, including deferred taxes of $7.2, $7.1 and $31.0295.5
 264.2
 328.4
Other Assets, including deferred taxes of $11.4, $12.2 and $15.7216.7
 259.0
 286.7
Total Assets$10,745.0
 $10,931.8
 $11,585.3
$11,179.8
 $10,673.8
 $10,632.1
          
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
Current Liabilities:          
Accounts payable $551.0
 $565.3
 $576.7
$631.8
 $636.1
 $551.0
Accrued expenses, including deferred taxes of $0.0, $0.5 and $0.1667.2
 724.3
 731.8
Accrued expenses703.2
 696.3
 667.2
Deferred revenue 31.0
 31.2
 31.1
33.8
 32.3
 31.0
Short-term borrowings 8.1
 8.5
 165.2
19.4
 25.9
 8.1
Current portion of long-term debt 111.7
 99.3
 99.3
—
 136.6
 111.7
Total Current Liabilities 1,369.0
 1,428.6
 1,604.1
1,388.2
 1,527.2
 1,369.0
Long-Term Debt3,262.2
 3,438.7
 3,642.9
3,358.2
 3,031.7
 3,236.8
Other Liabilities, including deferred taxes of $976.9, $1,004.3 and $1,183.21,704.0
 1,700.2
 1,808.0
Other Liabilities, including deferred taxes of $872.5, $836.4 and $889.41,629.8
 1,562.6
 1,616.5
Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest0.1
 —
 —
Stockholders’ Equity:          
Preferred stock, par value $100 per share; 150,000 total shares authorized —
 —
 —
—
 —
 —
Common stock, par value $1 per share; 240,000,000 shares authorized; 83,479,689; 83,116,062 and 82,988,978 shares issued83.5
 83.1
 83.0
Common stock, par value $1 per share; 240,000,000 shares authorized; 83,872,364; 83,545,818 and 83,479,689 shares issued83.9
 83.5
 83.5
Additional paid in capital - common stock 2,797.1
 2,768.7
 2,731.9
2,844.8
 2,822.5
 2,797.1
Retained earnings 2,208.2
 2,001.3
 1,727.2
2,874.1
 2,561.2
 2,208.2
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(579.9) (416.5) 59.7
Less: 843,305; 603,482 and 596,991 shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost(99.1) (72.3) (71.5)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(652.7) (704.2) (579.9)
Less: 3,540,949; 2,057,850 and 843,305 shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost(346.6) (210.7) (99.1)
Total Stockholders’ Equity 4,409.8
 4,364.3
 4,530.3
4,803.5
 4,552.3
 4,409.8
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$10,745.0
 $10,931.8
 $11,585.3
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest and Stockholders’ Equity$11,179.8
 $10,673.8
 $10,632.1


See accompanying notes.

3



PVH Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
(In millions)
Twenty-Six Weeks EndedTwenty-Six Weeks Ended
August 2, August 3,July 31, August 2,
2015 20142016 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net income$216.3
 $161.7
$322.1
 $216.3
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 124.0
 121.1
153.2
 124.0
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates(8.6) (3.9)
Equity in net loss (income) of unconsolidated affiliates0.5
 (8.6)
Deferred taxes 11.8
 (30.8)(3.8) (0.8)
Stock-based compensation expense 20.4
 24.4
19.5
 20.4
Impairment of long-lived assets1.6
 2.3
—
 1.6
Debt modification and extinguishment costs—
 93.1
15.8
 —
Net gain on deconsolidation of subsidiaries and joint venture—
 (8.0)
Gain to write-up equity investment in joint venture to fair value

(153.1) —
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Trade receivables, net 106.0
 (1.5)97.7
 106.0
Inventories, net (164.6) (88.7)(55.6) (164.6)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue (45.0) (96.3)(15.9) (45.0)
Prepaid expenses (16.4) (47.2)(0.8) (16.4)
Other, net 77.5
 44.0
29.1
 90.1
Net cash provided by operating activities323.0
 170.2
408.7
 323.0
INVESTING ACTIVITIES(1)
      
Business acquisitions—
 (7.4)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(157.7) —
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (100.9) (102.7)(102.8) (100.9)
Proceeds from sale of building16.7
 —
Contingent purchase price payments(23.9) (24.0)(25.2) (23.9)
Decrease in restricted cash20.2
 9.7
Change in restricted cash—
 20.2
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates(22.6) (26.2)(1.5) (22.6)
Net cash used by investing activities (127.2) (150.6)(270.5) (127.2)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES(1)
      
Net (payments on) proceeds from short-term borrowings(0.4) 160.3
Redemption of 7 3/8% senior notes, including make whole premium—
 (667.6)
Proceeds from 2014 facilities, net of related fees—
 586.7
Repayment of 2014 facilities(165.7) (219.8)
Net payments on short-term borrowings(6.5) (0.4)
Proceeds from 2016 facilities, net of related fees571.1
 —
Repayment of Term Loan B in connection with amendment to 2014 facilities(582.0) —
Repayment of 2016/2014 facilities(201.2) (165.7)
Proceeds from 3 5/8% senior notes, net of related fees389.6
 —
Net proceeds from settlement of awards under stock plans5.3
 6.7
10.3
 5.3
Excess tax benefits from awards under stock plans 3.4
 4.6
0.5
 3.4
Cash dividends (9.4) (9.4)(9.2) (9.4)
Acquisition of treasury shares (26.8) (10.3)(133.9) (26.8)
Payments of capital lease obligations(3.8) (4.5)(3.6) (3.8)
Net cash used by financing activities(197.4) (153.3)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities35.1
 (197.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (11.0) 1.6
12.0
 (11.0)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(12.6) (132.1)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents185.3
 (12.6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 479.3
 593.2
556.4
 479.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $466.7
 $461.1
$741.7
 $466.7

(1) See Note 17 for information on noncash investingNoncash Investing and financing transactions.Financing Transactions.

See accompanying notes.

4



PVH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. GENERAL

PVH Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) constitute a global apparel company whose brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brand names, including Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner’s and Olga, which are owned, and Speedo, which is licensed in perpetuity for North America and the Caribbean, as well as various other owned, licensed and private label brands. The Company designs and markets branded dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, jeanswear, underwear, intimate apparel, swim products, and, to a lesser extent, handbags, footwear and other related products and licenses its owned brands over a broad range of products. References to the aforementioned and other brand names are to registered trademarks owned by the Company or licensed to the Company by third parties and are identified by italicizing the brand name.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in entities that the Company does not control but has the ability to exercise significant influence over are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s Consolidated Income Statements include its proportionate share of the net income or loss of these entities. Please see Note 4,6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” for a further discussion. As a resultDuring the second quarter of the acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”) in 2013,2016, the Company, acquired a majorityalong with its minority interest inpartner, formed a joint venture in India that wasEthiopia. The joint venture is consolidated and the minority shareholder’s proportionate share (25%) of the equity in this joint venture is accounted for as a redeemable non-controlling interest during 2013. The redeemable non-controlling interest represented the minority shareholders’ proportionate share (49%) of the equity in that entity. During the first quarter of 2014, in connection with the sale of the minority shareholders’ interests to a third party, the Company and the new shareholder entered into a shareholders agreement with different governing arrangements between the Company and the new shareholder as compared to the arrangements with the prior minority shareholders. Based on the new arrangements, the Company no longer is deemed to hold a controlling interest and the joint venture was deconsolidated. As a result, since the first quarter of 2014, the Company’s investment in the joint venture has been accounted for using the equity method of accounting.interest. Please see Note 5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” for a further discussion.

The Company’s fiscal years are based on the 52-53 week periods ending on the Sunday closest to February 1 of each calendar year and are designated by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. References to a year are to the Company’s fiscal year, unless the context requires otherwise.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not contain all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. Reference should beis made to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2015January 31, 2016.

The preparation of interim financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

The results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of those for a full fiscal year due, in part, to seasonal factors. The data contained in these financial statements are unaudited and are subject to year-end adjustments. However, in the opinion of management, all known adjustments (which consist only of normal recurring accruals) have been made to present fairly the consolidated operating results for the unaudited periods.

The Company records warehousing and distribution expenses as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in its Consolidated Income Statements. Warehousing and distribution expenses totaled $53.2$57.4 million and $61.8$53.2 million in the thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014, respectively, and totaled $110.7$115.7 million and $126.4$110.7 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014, respectively.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for the prior year periods to present that information on a basis consistent with the current year. 




5


2. INVENTORIES

Inventories are comprised principally of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost for principally all wholesale inventories in North America and certain wholesale and retail inventories in Asia and Latin America is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Cost for all other inventories is determined using the weighted average cost method. The Company reviews current business trends, inventory aging and discontinued merchandise categories to determine adjustments whichthat it estimates will be needed to liquidate existing clearance inventories and reducerecord inventories toat the lower of cost or market.

3. ACQUISITIONS

AcquisitionThe Company acquired on April 13, 2016 the 55% of Russia Franchiseethe ownership interests in TH Asia, Ltd. (“TH China”), its joint venture for Tommy Hilfiger in China, that it did not already own. Prior to April 13, 2016, the 45% interest in TH China owned by the Company was accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Following the acquisition of the 55% interest, the results of TH China’s operations were consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

DuringTH China began operating the Tommy Hilfiger wholesale and retail distribution businesses in China in 2011 and licensed from a subsidiary of the Company the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks for use in connection with these businesses.

The carrying value of the Company’s 45% interest in TH China prior to the acquisition was $52.5 million. In connection with the acquisition, this investment was remeasured to a fair value of $205.6 million, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax noncash gain of $153.1 million during the first quarter of 2014,2016. Such fair value was estimated based on the Company acquired for $4.3 million two Tommy Hilfiger stores in Russia fromfair value of TH China using future operating cash flow projections discounted at a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee. This transaction wasrate of return that accounted for asthe relative risks of the estimated future cash flows and included an estimated discount for a business combination.lack of marketability.

AcquisitionThe acquisition date fair value of Ireland Franchiseethe consideration for the 55% interest that the Company did not already own was $265.8 million, consisting of $263.0 million paid in cash and the elimination of a $2.8 million pre-acquisition receivable owed to the Company by TH China. Together with the fair value of the Company’s 45% interest, the total fair value of TH China was $471.4 million. The estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed included net assets of $99.2 million (including $105.3 million of cash acquired), $110.6 million of other intangible assets and $261.6 million of goodwill. The goodwill of $261.6 million was assigned to the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger International segment. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The other intangible assets of $110.6 million as of April 13, 2016 included reacquired license rights of $72.0 million, order backlog of $26.2 million and customer relationships of $12.4 million, which are subject to amortization on a straight-line basis over 2.7 years, 0.8 years and 10.0 years, respectively. The Company is still in the process of finalizing the valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed; thus, the allocation of the acquisition consideration is subject to change.

4. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

During 2015, one of the firstCompany’s European subsidiaries entered into an agreement to sell an owned building in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The Company classified the building as held for sale beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014,2015 and ceased recording depreciation on the building at that time. The building had a carrying value of $14.7 million as of January 31, 2016, which was determined to be lower than the fair value, less costs to sell, and was included in other current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in the Calvin Klein International segment.
The Company completed the sale of the building on July 4, 2016 for proceeds of €15.0 million (approximately $16.7 million based on the exchange rate in effect on that date) and recorded a gain of $1.5 million, which represented the excess of the proceeds, less costs to sell, over the carrying value on that date. The gain was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statement during the second quarter of 2016 and was included in the Calvin Klein International segment.

5. REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

On June 29, 2016, the Company acquiredand Arvind Limited (“Arvind”) formed a joint venture in Ethiopia, PVH Arvind Manufacturing Private Limited Company (“PVH Ethiopia”), in which the Company owns a 75% interest. The Company made an initial contribution of $0.2 million to PVH Ethiopia at formation and has consolidated the joint venture in its consolidated financial statements. PVH Ethiopia was formed to operate a manufacturing facility that will produce finished products for $3.1 million six Tommy Hilfiger storesthe Company for distribution primarily in Ireland from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination.the United States. The Company expects the manufacturing facility will begin operations in 2017.



The shareholders agreement entered into by the parties to the joint venture (the “Shareholders Agreement”) contains a put
option under which the non-controlling shareholder can require the Company to purchase all of its shares in the
joint venture during various future periods as specified in the Shareholders Agreement. The first such period immediately precedes the ninth anniversary of the date of incorporation of PVH Ethiopia. The Shareholders Agreement also contains call options under which the Company can require the non-controlling shareholder to sell to the Company (i) all or a portion of its shares during various future periods as specified in the Shareholders Agreement; (ii) all of its shares in the event of a change of control of the non-controlling shareholder; or (iii) all of its shares in the event that the non-controlling shareholder ceases to hold at least ten percent of the outstanding shares. The Company’s first call option referred to in clause (i) immediately follows the fifth anniversary of the date of incorporation of PVH Ethiopia. The put and call prices are the fair market value of the shares on the redemption date based upon a multiple of the joint venture’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the prior 12 months, less the joint venture’s net debt.

The fair value of the non-controlling interest as of the date of formation of the joint venture was $0.1 million. The carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest is adjusted to equal the redemption amount at the end of each reporting period, provided that this amount at the end of each reporting period cannot be lower than the initial fair value. Such changes in the redemption amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest are recognized immediately as they occur, since it is probable that the non-controlling interest will become redeemable in the future based on the passage of time. Any adjustment to the redemption amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest is determined after attribution of net income of the redeemable non-controlling interest and will be recognized immediately in retained earnings of the Company. The carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest as of July 31, 2016 was $0.1 million.

4.6. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Karl Lagerfeld
The Company acquired a 10%an economic interest of approximately 10% in Kingdom Holding 1 B.V., the parent company of the Karl Lagerfeld brand (“Karl Lagerfeld”) during 2014 for $18.9 million. During the first quarter of 2014 for $18.9 million. An executive of2016, a third party acquired a minority stake in Karl Lagerfeld, diluting the Company, who is also a former director, ownsCompany’s economic interest to approximately 35% of Karl Lagerfeld.8%. The Company has significant influence as defined under FASB guidance with respect to itsthis investment, in Karl Lagerfeld. This investmentwhich is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger and Heritage BrandsPVH Australia
The Company formed a joint venture, PVH Brands Australia Pty. Limited (“PVH Australia”), in 2013 in which the Company owns a 50% economic interest. The joint venture licenseshas licensed from a subsidiary of the Company since the first quarter of 2014 the rights to distribute and sell certain Calvin Klein brand products in Australia, New Zealand and other island nations in the South Pacific. As part of the transaction, the Company contributed to the joint venturePVH Australia its subsidiaries that were operating the Calvin Klein Jeans businesses in Australia and New Zealand. In connection with this contribution, which took place on the first day of 2014, the Company deconsolidated the contributed subsidiaries and recognized a net gain of $2.1 million during the first quarter of 2014, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. The gain was measured as the difference between the fair value of the Company’s 50% interest and the carrying value of the net assets and cash contributed. The fair value was determined by a third party valuation firm using the discounted cash flow method, based on net sales projections for the Calvin Klein business in Australia, New Zealand, and other island nations in the South Pacific and was discounted using a rate of return that accounted for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows.

During the first quarter of 2015, the Company completed a transaction wherebyin which the Tommy Hilfiger and Van Heusen trademarks in Australia were licensed for certain product categories to subsidiaries of PVH Australia for use in Australia, New Zealand and, in the case of Tommy Hilfiger, other island nations in the South Pacific. The Tommy Hilfiger trademarks had previously been licensed to a third party and the Van Heusen trademarks had previously been licensed to the Company’s joint venture partner in PVH Australia. Additionally, subsidiaries of PVH Australia license other trademarks for certain product categories.

The Company made a net paymentspayment of $21.0 million and $7.3 million to PVH Australia during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014, respectively, representingwhich represented its 50% share of the joint venture funding.funding for the period. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Calvin KleinCK India

The Company acquired in 2013 a 51% economic interest in a Calvin Klein joint venture in India Premium Garments Wholesale Tradingthat has since been renamed Calvin Klein Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“CK India”), as part of the Warnaco acquisition. The joint venture. CK India licenses from a subsidiary of the Company subsidiary the rights to the Calvin Klein trademarks in India for certain product categories. BeginningCK India was consolidated in the Company’s financial statements during 2013. During the first quarter of 2014, Arvind purchased the Company’s prior joint venture partners’ shares in CK India and, as a result of the entry into a shareholder agreement with different governing arrangements between the Company and Arvind, the Company no longer was deemed to hold a controlling interest in the joint venture. CK India was deconsolidated as a result and the Company began reporting its 51% interest as an equity method investment in the first quarter of 2014, this investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Please see Note 5, “Redeemable Non-2014.

6



Controlling Interest,” for a further discussion. The Company made a payment of $1.6 million to CK India during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 to contribute its 51% share of the joint venture funding.funding for the period.

Tommy HilfigerTH Brazil

The Company formed a joint venture, Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A. (“TH Brazil”), in Brazil in 2012, in which the Company owns a 40% economic interest. The joint ventureTH Brazil licenses from a subsidiary of the Company subsidiary the rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in Brazil for certain product categories. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Tommy Hilfiger ChinaThe Company made a payment of $1.5 million to TH Brazil during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 to contribute its 40% share of the joint venture funding for the period.

The Company formed a joint venture, TH Asia Ltd., in China in 2010, in which the Company owns a 45% economic interest. The joint venture began operating the Tommy Hilfiger wholesale and retail distribution businesses in China in 2011. The joint venture licenses from a Company subsidiary the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks for use in connection with these businesses. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Tommy Hilfiger India

The Company acquired in 2011 a 50% economic interest in a company that has since been renamed Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“TH India”). TH India licenses from a Company subsidiary the rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India for certain product categories. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Arvind, the Company’s joint venture partner in PVH Ethiopia and in CK India, is also the Company’s joint venture partner in TH India.

TH China

The Company formed TH China as a joint venture in 2010. This investment was accounted for under the equity method of accounting until April 13, 2016, on which date the Company acquired the 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that it did not already own. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” for a further discussion.

Total Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

Included in other assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2016, January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, February 1, 2015 is $94.6 million, $140.7 million (of which $52.9 million related to TH China) and August 3, 2014 is $134.7$134.7 million $108.3(of which $47.4 million and $112.0 million,related to TH China), respectively, related to these investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

5. REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
CK India was consolidated in the Company’s financial statements during 2013. Please see Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” for a further discussion.

During the first quarter of 2014, Arvind Limited, the Company’s joint venture partner in TH India, purchased the Company’s prior joint venture partners’ shares in CK India and, as a result of the entry into a shareholders agreement with different governing arrangements between the Company and Arvind Limited as compared to the arrangements with the prior minority shareholders, the Company no longer is deemed to hold a controlling interest in the joint venture. CK India was deconsolidated as a result and the Company began reporting its 51% interest as an equity method investment in the first quarter of 2014. The Company recognized a net gain of $5.9 million in connection with the deconsolidation of CK India during the first quarter of 2014, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements. The gain was measured as the difference between the fair value of the Company’s 51% interest and the carrying value. The fair value was determined by a third party valuation firm using the discounted cash flow method, based on net sales projections for the Calvin Klein business in India and was discounted using a rate of return that accounted for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows.



















7






6.7. GOODWILL

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, by segment (please see Note 18, “Segment Data,” for a further discussion of the Company’s reportable segments), were as follows:
(In millions)Calvin Klein North America Calvin Klein International Tommy Hilfiger North America Tommy Hilfiger International Heritage Brands Wholesale Heritage Brands Retail TotalCalvin Klein North America Calvin Klein International Tommy Hilfiger North America Tommy Hilfiger International Heritage Brands Wholesale Heritage Brands Retail Total
Balance as of February 1, 2015             
Balance as of January 31, 2016             
Goodwill, gross $705.4
 $859.6
 $204.4
 $1,251.4
 $238.3
 $11.9
 $3,271.0
$728.0
 $841.5
 $204.4
 $1,208.4
 $237.0
 $11.9
 $3,231.2
Accumulated impairment losses —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (11.9) (11.9)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (11.9) (11.9)
Goodwill, net 705.4
 859.6
 204.4
 1,251.4
 238.3
 —
 3,259.1
728.0
 841.5
 204.4
 1,208.4
 237.0
 —
 3,219.3
Contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein12.8
 9.2
 —
 —
 —
 —
 22.0
13.9
 9.7
 —
 —
 —
 —
 23.6
Currency translation and other(3.4) (20.5) —
 (36.5) (0.5) —
 (60.9)
Balance as of August 2, 2015             
Acquisition of TH China—
 —
 —
 261.6
 —
 —
 261.6
Currency translation0.2
 16.7
 —
 14.9
 (0.2) —
 31.6
Balance as of July 31, 2016             
Goodwill, gross 714.8
 848.3
 204.4
 1,214.9
 237.8
 11.9
 3,232.1
742.1
 867.9
 204.4
 1,484.9
 236.8
 11.9
 3,548.0
Accumulated impairment losses —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (11.9) (11.9)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (11.9) (11.9)
Goodwill, net $714.8
 $848.3
 $204.4
 $1,214.9
 $237.8
 $—
 $3,220.2
$742.1
 $867.9
 $204.4
 $1,484.9
 $236.8
 $—
 $3,536.1

The Company is required to make contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein in connection with the Company’s acquisition in 2003 of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Calvin Klein, Inc. and certain affiliated companies (collectively, “Calvin Klein”). Such payments are based on 1.15% of total worldwide net sales, as defined in the acquisition agreement (as amended), of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands and are required to be made with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. A significant portion of the sales on which the payments to Mr. Klein are made are wholesale sales by the Company and its licensees and other partners to retailers.

7.8. RETIREMENT AND BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has five qualified defined benefit pension plans as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 covering substantially all employees resident in the United States who meet certain age and service requirements. The plans provide monthly benefits upon retirement generally based on career average compensation and years of credited service. Vesting in plan benefits generally occurs after five years of service. The Company refers to these five noncontributory plans as its “Pension Plans.” The Company also acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition a defined benefit pension plan for certain of Warnaco’s former employees in Europe. This plan was not considered to be material for disclosure purposes for any period presented.

The Company also has for certain members of Tommy Hilfiger’s domestic senior management a supplemental executive retirement plan, which is an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plan. Such plan is frozen and, as a result, participants do not accrue additional benefits. In addition, the Company has a capital accumulation program, which is an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan. Under the individual participants’ agreements, the participants in this plan will receive a predetermined amount during the 10 years following the attainment of age 65,, provided that prior to the termination of employment with the Company, the participant has been in the plan for at least 10 years and has attained age 55.55. The Company also has for certain employees resident in the United States who meet certain age and service requirements an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plan, which provides benefits for compensation in excess of Internal Revenue Service earnings limits and requires payments to vested employees upon, or shortly after, employment termination or retirement. The Company refers to these three noncontributory plans as its “SERP Plans.”

The Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain retirees resident in the United States. Retirees contribute to the cost of this plan, which is unfunded. During 2002, the postretirement plan was amended to eliminate the Company contribution, which partially subsidized benefits, for active participants who, as of January 1, 2003, had not attained age 55 and 10 years of service. As a result of the Company’s acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”) in 2013, the Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain Warnaco retirees resident in the United

8



States. Retirees contribute to the cost of this plan, which is unfunded. This plan was frozen on January 1, 2014. The Company refers to these two plans as its “Postretirement Plans.”



Net benefit cost related to the Company’s Pension Plans was recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements as follows:

Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In millions)8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
              
Service cost, including plan expenses $8.2
 $4.8
 $15.3
 $9.8
$6.1
 $8.2
 $12.6
 $15.3
Interest cost 6.8
 7.1
 13.9
 14.2
7.4
 6.8
 14.9
 13.9
Expected return on plan assets (10.4) (10.9) (21.2) (21.8)(8.9) (10.4) (17.9) (21.2)
Total $4.6
 $1.0
 $8.0
 $2.2
$4.6
 $4.6
 $9.6
 $8.0

Net benefit cost related to the Company’s SERP Plans was recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements as follows:

Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In millions)8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
              
Service cost, including plan expenses$1.5
 $1.1
 $2.8
 $2.2
$0.9
 $1.5
 $2.2
 $2.8
Interest cost0.9
 1.1
 1.8
 2.0
0.9
 0.9
 1.9
 1.8
Total$2.4
 $2.2
 $4.6
 $4.2
$1.8
 $2.4
 $4.1
 $4.6

Net benefit cost related to the Company’s Postretirement Plans was recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements as follows:

Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In millions)8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
              
Interest cost$0.1
 $0.2
 $0.3
 $0.4
$0.1
 $0.1
 $0.3
 $0.3
Amortization of prior service credit(0.1) (0.2) (0.2) (0.4)(0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.2)
Total$0.0
 $0.0
 $0.1
 $0.0
$0.0
 $0.0
 $0.1
 $0.1

Currently, the Company expects to make a contribution of approximately $1.5$6.9 million to its Pension Plans in 2015.2016. The Company’s actual contributions may differ from planned contributions due to many factors including changes in tax and other benefit laws, or significant differences between expected and actual pension asset performance or interest rates.

8.9. DEBT

Short-Term Borrowings

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries has a yen-denominated short-term lines of credit and overdraft facilityfacilities with a number of Japanese bankbanks at various interest rates that providesprovide for borrowings of up to ¥1,000.0¥2,200.0 million (approximately $8.0$21.3 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015July 31, 2016) and are utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. As of July 31, 2016, the Company had $19.4 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at July 31, 2016 was 0.28%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was $19.4 million.

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries has a won-denominated overdraft facility with a South Korean bank that provides for borrowings of up to ₩3,500.0 million (approximately $3.1 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and bear interest at the one-month Japanese interbank borrowingSouth Korean bank three-month certificate of deposit rate plus 0.30%. Such facility renews automatically unless the Company gives notice of termination. As of August 2, 2015, the Company had approximately $8.0 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at August 2, 2015 was 0.43%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was equal to the maximum amount of borrowings available under this facility.

One of the Company’s European subsidiaries has short-term revolving notes with a number of banks at various interest rates, as well as euro-denominated overdraft facilities, that provide for borrowings of up to €60.0 million (approximately $65.8 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015). These facilities are used primarily to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.

9




One of the Company’s European subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Turkish bank that provides for borrowings of up to $3.0 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Turkish Central Bank lending rate plus 0.50%1.50%. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of August 2, 2015. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was approximately $2.5 million.

One of the Company’s European subsidiaries has Turkish lira-denominated short-term line of credit facilities with a number of Turkish banks that provide for borrowings of up to lira 6.0 million (approximately $2.2 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015) and are utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at the Turkish Central Bank lending rate plus 1.25%. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.

One of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries has a peso-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Mexican bank that provides for borrowings of up to ₱67.4 million (approximately $4.2 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate plus 1.50%. As of August 2, 2015, the Company had approximately $0.1 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding at August 2, 2015 was 4.81%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was approximately $2.5 million.July 31, 2016.

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with one lendera bank that provides for borrowings of up to $10.0 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings


under this facility bear interest at 1.75% plus the one-month London interbank borrowing rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.50%. At the end of each month, amounts outstanding under this facility may be carried forward for additional one-month periods for up to one year. This facility is subject to certain terms and conditions and may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the lender.bank. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.July 31, 2016.

One of the Company’s AsianEuropean subsidiaries has a Korean won-denominatedeuro-denominated short-term revolving credit facilitynotes with one lendera number of banks at various interest rates, as well as overdraft facilities, that providesprovide for borrowings of up to ₩3,000.0€60.0 million (approximately $2.6$66.7 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015July 31, 2016) and are used primarily to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016.

One of the Company’s European subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Turkish bank that provides for borrowings of up to $3.7 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the three-month Cost of Funds IndexTurkish overnight lending rate plus a specified margin. There were3.00%. As of July 31, 2016, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility asfacility. The maximum amount of orborrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015 July 31, 2016 was $3.3 million.

One of the Company’s European subsidiaries has a Turkish lira-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Turkish bank that provides for borrowings of up to lira 3.0 million (approximately $1.0 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Turkish overnight lending rate plus 4.00%. As of July 31, 2016, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was $0.9 million.

One of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries has a peso-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with a Mexican bank that provides for borrowings of up to ₱161.1 million (approximately $8.5 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate plus 0.90%. As of July 31, 2016, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was equal to the maximum amount of borrowings available under this facility.

One of the Company’s Latin American subsidiaries has a Brazilian real-denominated short-term revolving credit facilitiesfacility with a number of banksBrazilian bank that provideprovides for total available borrowings of up to R$83.025.0 million (approximately $24.6$7.6 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015July 31, 2016) and areis utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at various interest rates.this facility are unsecured. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016.

The Company also has the ability to draw revolving borrowings under its senior secured credit facilities as discussed in the section entitled “2014“2016 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below. There wereAs of July 31, 2016, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of August 2, 2015.facilities. The maximum amount of revolving borrowings outstanding under these facilities during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was approximately $16.0$15.3 million. In addition, the Company has certain other facilities under which there were no borrowings outstanding as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.


10



Long-Term Debt

The carrying amounts of the Company’s long-term debt were as follows:
(In millions)8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15
      
Senior secured Term Loan A facility due 2019$1,856.7
 $1,954.3
Senior secured Term Loan B facility due 2020717.5
 988.2
Senior secured Term Loan A facility due 2021$2,187.3
 $1,853.3
Senior secured Term Loan B facility—
 707.9
4 1/2% senior unsecured notes due 2022700.0
 700.0
689.6
 688.0
7 3/4% debentures due 202399.7
 99.7
99.4
 99.3
3 5/8% senior unsecured notes due 2024381.9
 —
Total 3,373.9
 3,742.2
3,358.2
 3,348.5
Less: Current portion of long-term debt 111.7
 99.3
—
 111.7
Long-term debt $3,262.2
 $3,642.9
$3,358.2
 $3,236.8

Please see Note 12, “Fair Value Measurements,” for the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt as of July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015.



As of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, the Company’s mandatory long-term debt repayments for the next five years were as follows:

(In millions)  
Remainder of 2015$49.7
2016136.6
Remainder of 2016$—
2017186.2
56.1
2018198.6
161.4
20191,291.1
220.1
2020721.6
234.7
20211,525.8

Total debt repayments for the next five years exceed the carrying balanceamount of the Company’s term loan facilitiesTerm Loan A facility as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 because the carrying balanceamount reflects a portionthe unamortized portions of debt issuance costs and the original issue discount.discounts.

As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, after taking into account the effect of the Company’s interest rate swap and cap agreements discussed in the section below entitled “2014“2016 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below,Facilities,” which were in effect as of such date, approximately 70%65% of the Company’s long-term debt had a fixed or cappedinterest rate, with the remainder at uncapped variable interest rates.

2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On February 13, 2013, simultaneously with and related to the closing of the Warnaco acquisition, the Company entered into senior secured credit facilities (the “2013 facilities”), the proceeds of which were used to fund a portion of the acquisition, repay all outstanding borrowings under the Company’s prior facilities and repay all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt. The 2013 facilities consisted of a $1,700.0 million United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7.3 million as of the acquisition date), a $1,375.0 million United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $6.9 million as of the acquisition date) and senior secured revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million (based on the applicable exchange rates on February 13, 2013), consisting of (a) a $475.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €185.9 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs.

On March 21, 2014, the Company amended and restated the 2013 facilities, as discussed in the following section.


11



2014 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On March 21, 2014, (the “Restatement Date”), the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2013its senior secured credit facilities (as amended, by the Amendment, the “2014 facilities”). The Amendment provided for an additional $350.0 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility and an additional $250.0 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan B facility and extended the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2018 to February 13, 2019. The maturity of the Term Loan B facility remains at February 13, 2020. On the Restatement Date, the Company borrowed the additional principal amounts described above and used the proceeds to redeem all of its outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes, as discussed in the section entitled “7 3/8% Senior Notes Due 2020” below. In connection with entering into the Amendment, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $13.3 million (of which $8.0 million was expensed as debt modification and extinguishment costs and $5.3 million is being amortized over the term of the related debt agreement) and recorded additional debt modification and extinguishment costs of $3.2 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs.

The 2014 facilities consistconsisted of a $1,986.3 million United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility, (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7.8 million), a $1,188.6 million United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $5.7 million) and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €185.9 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs.

On May 19, 2016, the Company amended the 2014 facilities, as discussed in the following section.

2016 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On May 19, 2016 (the “Amendment Date”), the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2014 facilities (as amended by the Amendment, the “2016 facilities”). Among other things, the Amendment provided for an additional $582.0 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility, the repayment of all outstanding loans under the Term Loan B facility and the termination of the Term Loan B facility. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2019 to May 19, 2021. On the Amendment Date, the Company borrowed the additional $582.0 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility made available pursuant to the Amendment and used the proceeds of such borrowings to repay the $582.0 million principal amount of loans outstanding under the Term Loan B facility under the 2014 facilities.

The 2016 facilities consist of a $2,347.4 million United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25.0 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €185.9 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs. In connection with entering into the Amendment, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $10.9 million (of which $4.6 million was expensed as debt modification costs and $6.3 million is being amortized over the term of the related debt agreement) and recorded debt extinguishment costs of $11.2 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs.

The revolving credit facilities also include amounts available for letters of credit. As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, the Company had no outstanding revolving credit borrowings and $38.1$24.1 million of outstanding letters of credit. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facilities. A portion of each of the United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facilities is also available for the making of swingline loans. The issuance of such letters of credit and the making of any swingline loan reduces the amount available under the applicable revolving credit facility. So long as certain conditions are satisfied, the Company may add one or more term loan facilities or increase the commitments under the revolving credit facilities by an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (1) the sum of (x) $1,350.0 million plus (y) the aggregate amount of all voluntary prepayments of term loans under the facilitiesTerm Loan A and the revolving credit facilities (to the extent, in the case of voluntary prepayments of loans under the revolving credit facilities, there is an equivalent permanent reduction of the revolving commitments) plus (z) an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated) and (2) an


additional unlimited amount as long as the ratio of the Company’s senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 20142016 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase. The lenders under the 20142016 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

DuringThe terms of the Term Loan A facility require the Company to make quarterly repayments of amounts outstanding under the 2016 facilities, which commenced with the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2016. Such amounts equal 5.00% per annum of the principal amount outstanding on the Amendment Date for the first eight calendar quarters following the Amendment Date, 7.50% per annum of the principal amount for the four quarters thereafter and 10.00% per annum of the principal amount for the remaining quarters, in each case paid in equal installments and in each case subject to certain customary adjustments, with the balance due on the maturity date of the Term Loan A facility.

The Company made payments of $201.2 million and $165.7 million during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, the Company made payments of $165.7 millionrespectively, on its term loans under the 2014 and 2016 facilities. As a result of August 2, 2015,the voluntary repayments made by the Company, as of July 31, 2016, the Company had totalsatisfied its mandatory long-term debt repayment requirements for the next twelve months. The Company had term loans outstanding of $2,574.2$2,187.3 million, net of original issue discounts. The termsdiscounts and debt issuance costs, as of each of Term Loan A and Term Loan B contain a mandatory quarterly repayment schedule. Due to previous voluntary payments, the Company is not required to make any additional mandatory payments under Term Loan B prior to maturity.July 31, 2016.

Obligations of the CompanyThe Company’s obligations under the 20142016 facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’sits existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries, with certain exceptions. Obligations of the European Borrowerborrower under the 20142016 facilities are guaranteed by the Company, substantially all of itsthe Company’s existing and future direct and indirect domesticUnited States subsidiaries (with certain exceptions) and Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., aone of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary of the Company organized in the Netherlands.subsidiaries. The Company and its domesticUnited States subsidiary guarantors have pledged certain of their assets as security for the obligations under the 20142016 facilities.

The outstanding borrowings under the 20142016 facilities are prepayable at any time without penalty (other than customary breakage costs). The terms of the 20142016 facilities require the Company to repay certain amounts outstanding thereunder with (a) net cash proceeds of the incurrence of certain indebtedness, (b) net cash proceeds of certain asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or condemnation) that exceed certain thresholds, to the extent such proceeds are not reinvested or committed to be reinvested in the business in accordance with customary reinvestment provisions, and (c) a percentage of excess cash flow that exceeds the voluntary debt payments the Company has made during the applicable year, which percentage is based upon the Company’sits net leverage ratio during the relevant fiscal period.

The United States dollar-denominated borrowings under the 20142016 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the United States federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (iii) a one-month adjusted Eurocurrency rate plus 1.00%

12



(provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the base rate be deemed to be less than 1.75%) or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities (provided that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the adjusted Eurocurrency rate be deemed to be less than 0.75%).2016 facilities.

The Canadian dollar-denominated borrowings under the 20142016 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a Canadian prime rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the rate of interest per annum that Royal Bank of Canada establishes at its main office in Toronto, Ontario as the reference rate of interest in order to determine interest rates for loans in Canadian dollars to its Canadian borrowers and (ii) the sum of (x) the average of the rates per annum for Canadian dollar bankers’ acceptances having a term of one month that appears on the display referred to as “CDOR Page” of Reuters Monitor Money Rate Services as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date of determination, as reported by the administrative agent (and if such screen is not available, any successor or similar service as may be selected by the administrative agent), and (y) 0.75%, or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 20142016 facilities.

The borrowings under the 20142016 facilities in currencies other than United States dollars or Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 20142016 facilities.

The current applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan A facility and each revolving credit facility is 1.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 0.50% for base rate loans, respectively. The current applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan B facility is 2.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans, respectively. After the date of delivery of the compliance certificate and financial statements with respect to each of the Company’s fiscal quarter ending August 2, 2015,quarters, the applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan A facility, the Term Loan B facility and the revolving credit facilities is subject to adjustment based upon the Company’s net leverage ratio.

The 20142016 facilities contain customary events of default, including but not limited to nonpayment; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as


amended; certain events related to certain of the guarantees by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and certain pledges of itsthe Company’s assets and those of certain of itsthe Company’s subsidiaries, as security for the obligations under the 20142016 facilities; and a change in control (as defined in the 20142016 facilities).

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement for an 18-month term commencing on August 18, 2014. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of capping the interest rate on an initial notional amount of $514.2 million of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under the 2014 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms. Such agreement remains outstanding with a notional amount of $611.8 million as of August 2, 2015. Under the terms of this agreement, the one-month LIBOR that the Company will pay ispaid was capped at a rate of 1.50%. Therefore, the maximum amount of interest that the Company will paywould have paid on the then-outstanding notional amount will bewas at the 1.50% capped rate, plus the current applicable margin. The agreement expired on February 17, 2016.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a two-year term commencing on February 17, 2016. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $682.6 million of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under the 2014 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms, including the 2016 facilities, to fixed rate debt. Such agreement remains outstanding with a notional amount of $665.3 million as of July 31, 2016, and is now converting a portion of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under the 2016 facilities to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR is eliminated and itthe Company will pay a weighted average fixed rate of 1.924%, plus the current applicable margin.

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on August 19, 2013. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $1,228.8 million of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under itsthe Company’s previously outstanding 2013 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms, including the 2016 facilities, to fixed rate debt. Such agreement remainsremained outstanding with a notional amount of $882.4$427.4 million as of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, and is nowwas converting a portion of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under the 20142016 facilities to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR iswas eliminated and it will paythe Company paid a fixed rate of 0.604%, plus the current applicable margin.

In addition, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $632.0 million of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under its previously outstanding 2011 facilities, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. The agreement expired on June 6, 2014.August 17, 2016.

13




The notional amount of eachany outstanding interest rate swap and cap will be adjusted according to a pre-set schedule during the term of eachthe applicable swap and cap agreement such that, based on the Company’s projections for future debt repayments, the Company’s outstanding debt under the Term Loan A facility is expected to always equal or exceed the combined notional amount of the then-outstanding interest rate swaps and cap.swaps.

The 20142016 facilities also contain covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to finance future operations or capital needs, to take advantage of other business opportunities that may be in its interest or to satisfy its obligations under its other outstanding debt. These covenants restrict the Company’sits ability to, among other things:

incur or guarantee additional debt or extend credit;
make restricted payments, including paying dividends or making distributions on, or redeeming or repurchasing, the Company’s capital stock or certain debt;
make acquisitions and investments;
dispose of assets;
engage in transactions with affiliates;
enter into agreements restricting the Company’s subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;
create liens on the Company’s assets or engage in sale/leaseback transactions; and
effect a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer, or lease all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The 20142016 facilities require the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum interest coverage and maximum net leverage. A breach of any of these operating or financial covenants would result in a default under the applicable facility. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable which would result in acceleration of the Company’sits other debt. If the Company waswere unable to repay any such borrowings when due, the lenders could proceed against their collateral, which also secures some of the Company’s other indebtedness.



4 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2022

On December 20, 2012, the Company issued $700.0 million principal amount of 4 1/2% senior notes due December 15, 20222022. The Company paid $16.3 million of fees during 2013 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Subject to certain conditions, the Company may redeem up to 35%issuance of these notes, prior to December 15, 2015 withwhich are amortized over the net cash proceedsterm of certain equity offerings without having to pay a penalty or “make whole” premium.the notes. The Company may redeem some or all of these notes at any time prior to December 15, 2017 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem some or all of these notes on or after December 15, 2017 at specified redemption prices plus any accrued and unpaid interest. The Company’s ability to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments is limited, in each case, over specified amounts as defined in the indenture governing the notes.

7 3/4% Debentures Due 2023

The Company has outstanding $100.0 million of debentures due November 15, 2023 with a yield to maturity of 7.80%. The debentures accrue interest at the rate of 7 3/4%. Pursuant to the indenture governing the debentures, the Company must maintain a certain level of stockholders’ equity in order to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments, as defined in the indenture governing the debentures.

7 3/3 5/8% Senior Notes Due 20202024

On May 6, 2010,June 20, 2016, the Company issued $600.0€350.0 million euro-denominated principal amount of 7 3/3 5/8% senior notes due MayJuly 15, 2020. On March 24, 2014,2024. Interest on the notes is payable in euros. The Company paid €6.4 million (approximately $7.3 million based on exchange rates in effect on the payment date) of fees during the second quarter of 2016 in connection with the amendment and restatementissuance of these notes, which are amortized over the 2013 facilities discussed above in the section entitled “2014 Senior Secured Credit Facilities,” the Company redeemed all of its outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes and, pursuant to the indenture under which the notes were issued, paid a “make whole” premium of $67.6 million to the holdersterm of the notes. The Company also recorded costsmay redeem some or all of $14.3 millionthese notes at any time prior to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs associated withApril 15, 2024 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem some or all of these notes.  notes on or after April 15, 2024 at their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.


14Substantially all of the Company’s assets have been pledged as collateral to secure the Company’s obligations under its senior secured credit facilities, the 7 3/4% debentures due 2023 and contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein as discussed in Note 7, “Goodwill.”


9.10. INCOME TAXES

The effective income tax rates for the thirteen weeks endedJuly 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014were 19.0%21.2% and (0.8)%19.0%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 were 15.3% and August 3, 2014 were 20.8% and 4.5%, respectively.
The effective income tax rates for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014July 31, 2016 were lower than the United States statutory rate principally due to the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where the Company files tax returns. In addition,Also contributing to the lower effective income tax rate for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was the benefit of certain discrete items, including the lower tax rate applicable to the pre-tax gain recorded to write-up the Company’s existing equity investment in TH China to fair value.
The effective income tax rates for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 include2, 2015 were lower than the favorable resolutionUnited States statutory rate due to the benefit of uncertainlower tax positions approximating $24.0 millionrates in international jurisdictions andwhere the favorable resolution of $6.0 million of an uncertainCompany files tax position related to European and United States transfer pricing arrangements.returns.

10.11. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to certain anticipated cash flows principally associated with certain international inventory purchases and certain intercompany transactions.purchases. The Company periodically uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge against a portion of this exposure.

The Company also has exposure to interest rate volatility related to its senior secured term loanloans under the 2016 facilities. The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements and an interest rate cap agreement to hedge against a portion of this exposure. The Company had also entered into an interest rate cap agreement, which expired on February 17, 2016. Please see Note 8,9, “Debt,” for a further discussion of the Company’s senior secured term loan facilities and these agreements.



The Company records the foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate contracts at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets, and does not net the related assets and liabilities. Changes in fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts associated with certain international inventory purchases and the interest rate contracts that are designated as effective hedging instruments (collectively referred to as “cash flow hedges”) are recorded in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) incomeloss (“AOCI”AOCL”). The cash flows from such hedges are presented in the same category onin the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the items being hedged. No amounts were excluded from effectiveness testing. There was no ineffective portion of cash flow hedges during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 20152015.

Net Investment Hedge

The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to the value of its investments in foreign subsidiaries denominated in a currency other than the United States dollar. To hedge against a portion of this exposure, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company designated the carrying amount of its €350.0 million euro-denominated principal amount of 3 5/8% senior notes due 2024 (the “foreign currency borrowings”) that it had issued in the United States as a net investment hedge of its investments in certain of its foreign subsidiaries that use the euro as their functional currency. Please see Note 9, “Debt,” for a further discussion of the Company’s foreign currency borrowings.

The Company records the foreign currency borrowings at carrying value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of the foreign currency borrowings is remeasured as of the end of each reporting period to reflect changes in the foreign currency exchange spot rate. Since the foreign currency borrowings are designated as a net investment hedge, such remeasurement is recorded in equity as a component of AOCL. As of July 31, 2016, the fair value and August 3, 2014. In addition, the carrying value of the foreign currency borrowings designated as a net investment hedge was $406.5 million and $381.9 million, respectively. The Company evaluates the effectiveness of its net investment hedge as of the beginning of each quarter. No amounts were excluded from effectiveness testing. There was no ineffective portion of the net investment hedge during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016.

Undesignated Contracts

The Company records immediately in earnings changes in the fair value of hedges that are not designated as effective hedging instruments (“undesignated contracts”), including all of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts related to intercompany loans that are not of a long-term investment nature. Any gains and losses that are immediately recognized in earnings on such contracts related to intercompany loans are largely offset by the remeasurement of the underlying intercompany loan balances.

In addition, the Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to the translation of the earnings of its subsidiaries denominated in a currency other than the United States dollar. To hedge against a portion of this exposure, the Company entered into several foreign currency option contracts during the second quarter of 2016. These contracts represent the Company’s purchase of euro put/United States dollar call options. In connection with the foreign currency option contracts, the Company paid a cash premium of $1.1 million during the second quarter of 2016.

The Company’s foreign currency option contracts are also undesignated contracts. As such, the changes in the fair value of these foreign currency option contracts are recognized immediately in earnings. This mitigates the effect of a strengthening United States dollar against the euro on the reporting of the Company’s euro-denominated earnings.

The Company does not use derivative or non-derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.



The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheets forof the Company’s derivative financial instruments:instruments in its Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(In millions)Asset Derivatives (Classified in Other Current Assets and Other Assets)Liability Derivatives (Classified in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities)Assets (Classified in Other Current Assets and Other Assets)Liabilities (Classified in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities)
8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 1/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 1/31/16 8/2/15
Contracts designated as cash flow hedges:                  
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases)$46.6
 $7.8
 $3.2
 $1.5
$6.8
 $24.9
 $46.6
 $12.5
 $1.7
 $3.2
Interest rate contracts0.3
 4.8
 14.4
 7.8
—
 —
 0.3
 17.0
 20.6
 14.4
Total contracts designated as cash flow hedges46.9
 12.6
 17.6
 9.3
6.8
 24.9
 46.9
 29.5
 22.3
 17.6
           
Undesignated contracts:                  
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (principally intercompany transactions)18.2
 0.7
 0.4
 0.7
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts1.8
 19.3
 18.2
 0.7
 0.1
 0.4
Foreign currency option contracts1.0
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Total undesignated contracts18.2
 0.7
 0.4
 0.7
2.8
 19.3
 18.2
 0.7
 0.1
 0.4
Total$65.1
 $13.3
 $18.0
 $10.0
$9.6
 $44.2
 $65.1
 $30.2
 $22.4
 $18.0

At August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, the notional amount outstanding of foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option contracts was $951.4925.9 million.million and $50.0 million, respectively. Such contracts expire principally between August 20152016 and December 2016.January 2018.


15



The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s hedges designated as cash flow and net investment hedging instruments:
 Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Expense)        Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCL into Income (Expense)       
(In millions) LocationAmount LocationAmount
                
Thirteen Weeks Ended 8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/14 7/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases) $23.1
 $13.5
 Cost of goods sold$27.5
 $(2.1) $21.2
 $23.1
 Cost of goods sold$3.5
 $27.5
Interest rate contracts  (2.6) (1.7) Interest expense(1.1) (1.7) (1.4) (2.6) Interest expense(2.7) (1.1)
Foreign currency borrowings (net investment hedge) 7.8
 —
 N/A—
 —
Total  $20.5
 $11.8
 $26.4
 $(3.8) $27.6
 $20.5
 $0.8
 $26.4
                
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/14 7/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases) $23.7
 $1.2
 Cost of goods sold$48.1
 $(5.5) $(37.2) $23.7
 Cost of goods sold$8.2
 $48.1
Interest rate contracts (1.5) (2.3) Interest expense(2.2) (3.6) (1.5) (1.5) Interest expense(5.1) (2.2)
Foreign currency borrowings (net investment hedge) 7.8
 —
 N/A—
 —
Total $22.2
 $(1.1) $45.9
 $(9.1) $(30.9) $22.2
 $3.1
 $45.9

A net gainloss in AOCIAOCL on foreign currency forward exchange contracts at August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 of $73.11.6 million is estimated to be reclassified in the next 12 months in the Company’s Consolidated Income StatementsStatement to costs of goods sold as the underlying inventory hedged by such forward exchange contracts is purchased and sold. In addition, a net loss in AOCIAOCL for interest rate contracts at August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 of $5.412.5 million is estimated to be reclassified to interest expense within the next 12 months. Amounts recognized in AOCL for foreign currency borrowings would be recognized in earnings only upon the sale or liquidation of the hedged net investment.



The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s foreign currency forward exchange undesignated contracts:
(In millions)

 Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Loss) Gain Recognized in (Expense) Income
Thirteen Weeks Ended Location 8/2/15 8/3/14 Location 7/31/16 8/2/15
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (principally intercompany transactions) Selling, general and administrative expenses $1.8
 $1.8
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expenses $(2.9) $1.8
Foreign currency option contracts 
Selling, general and administrative expenses

 (0.2) —
        
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Location 8/2/15 8/3/14 Location 7/31/16 8/2/15
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (principally intercompany transactions) Selling, general and administrative expenses $4.5
 $(0.3)
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expenses $(6.7) $4.5
Foreign currency option contracts 
Selling, general and administrative expenses

 (0.2) —

The Company had no derivative financial instruments with credit risk-related contingent features underlying the related contracts as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016.

11.12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a three level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

16




In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(In millions)8/2/15 2/1/15 8/3/147/31/16 1/31/16 8/2/15
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:                                    
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts N/A $64.8
 N/A $64.8
 N/A $110.4
 N/A $110.4
 N/A $8.5
 N/A $8.5
N/A $8.6
 N/A $8.6
 N/A $44.2
 N/A $44.2
 N/A $64.8
 N/A $64.8
Interest rate contractsN/A 0.3
 N/A 0.3
 N/A 0.6
 N/A 0.6
 N/A 4.8
 N/A 4.8
N/A —
 N/A —
 N/A —
 N/A —
 N/A 0.3
 N/A 0.3
Foreign currency option contractsN/A 1.0
 N/A 1.0
 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total AssetsN/A $65.1
 N/A $65.1
 N/A $111.0
 N/A $111.0
 N/A $13.3
 N/A $13.3
N/A $9.6
 N/A $9.6
 N/A $44.2
 N/A $44.2
 N/A $65.1
 N/A $65.1
                                    
Liabilities:                                    
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts N/A $3.6
 N/A $3.6
 N/A $1.3
 N/A $1.3
 N/A $2.2
 N/A $2.2
N/A $13.2
 N/A $13.2
 N/A $1.8
 N/A $1.8
 N/A $3.6
 N/A $3.6
Interest rate contractsN/A 14.4
 N/A 14.4
 N/A 15.3
 N/A 15.3
 N/A 7.8
 N/A 7.8
N/A 17.0
 N/A 17.0
 N/A 20.6
 N/A 20.6
 N/A 14.4
 N/A 14.4
Contingent purchase price payments related to reacquisition of the perpetual rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India
N/A N/A $4.1
 $4.1
 N/A N/A $4.0
 4.0
 N/A N/A $5.5
 5.5
N/A N/A $2.2
 2.2
 N/A N/A $2.2
 2.2
 N/A N/A $4.1
 4.1
Total LiabilitiesN/A $18.0
 $4.1

$22.1
 N/A $16.6
 $4.0
 $20.6
 N/A $10.0
 $5.5
 $15.5
N/A $30.2
 $2.2

$32.4
 N/A $22.4
 $2.2
 $24.6
 N/A $18.0
 $4.1
 $22.1

The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts is measured as the total amount of currency to be purchased, multiplied by the difference between (i) the forward rate as of the period end and (ii) the settlement rate specified in each contract. The fair values of the interest rate contracts are based on observable interest rate yield curves and represent the expected discounted cash flows underlying the financial instruments. The fair value of the foreign currency option contracts is estimated based on external valuation models, which do not involve management judgment and use the original strike price, current foreign currency exchange rates, the implied volatility in foreign currency exchange rates and length of time to expiration as inputs.

Pursuant to the agreement governing the reacquisition of the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks (which the Company entered into in September 2011 in connection with its acquisition of its 50% ownership of TH India), the Company is required to make annual contingent purchase price payments based on a percentage of sales of Tommy Hilfiger products in India in excess of an agreed upon threshold during each of five consecutive 12-month periods (extended to a sixth consecutive 12-month period if the aggregate payments for the five 12-month periods are not at least $15.0 million)million, which will be the case). Such payments are subject to a $25.0 million aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. The Company made annual contingent purchase price payments of $0.6 million, $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million during 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company is required to remeasure this liability at fair value on a recurring basis and classifies this as a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of such liability was determined using the discounted cash flow method, based on net sales projections for the Tommy Hilfiger apparel and accessories businesses in India, and was discounted using rates of return that account for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows. Excluding the initial recognition of the liability for the contingent purchase price payments and payments made to reduce the liability, changes in the fair value are included within selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements.

The following table presents the change in the Level 3 contingent purchase price payment liability during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015:
(In millions)Twenty-Six Weeks EndedTwenty-Six Weeks Ended
8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15
Beginning Balance$4.0
 $4.2
$2.2
 $4.0
Payments—
 —
—
 —
Adjustments included in earnings0.1
 1.3
0.0
 0.1
Ending Balance$4.1
 $5.5
$2.2
 $4.1


17




Additional information with respect to assumptions used to value the contingent purchase price payment liability as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 is as follows:
Unobservable Inputs Amount
Approximate compounded annual net sales growth rate 35.0%
Approximate
discount rate
 15.0%

A five percentage point increase or decrease in the discount rate would change the liability by approximately $0.5 million.

A five percentage point increase or decrease in the compounded annual net sales growth rate would result in an immaterial change to the liability by approximately $0.5 million.liability.

There were no transfers between any levels of the fair value hierarchy for any of the Company’s fair value measurements.

The following table shows the fair value of the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were required to be remeasured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (consisting of property, plant and equipment) during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014, and the total impairments recorded as a result of the remeasurement process:

(In millions)Fair Value Measurement Using Fair Value
As Of
Impairment Date		 
Total
 Impairments
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3  
August 2, 2015N/A N/A $—
 $—
 $1.6
August 3, 2014N/A N/A $—
 $—
 $2.3
(In millions)Fair Value Measurement Using Fair Value
As Of
Impairment Date		 
Total
 Impairments
 Assets:Level 1 Level 2 Level 3  
Property, plant and equipmentN/A N/A $—
 $—
 $1.6

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $1.6 million were written down to a fair value of zero during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 in connection with the financial performance in one of the Company’s Calvin Klein retail stores in North America. Fair value was determined based on the estimated future operating results reflecting poor year-to-date performance and current sales trends. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Calvin Klein North America segment.

Long-lived assetsIn connection with a carrying amountthe Company’s acquisition in April 2016 of $2.3 million were written downthe 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that it did not already own, the 45% interest in TH China owned by the Company was remeasured to a fair value of zero during$205.6 million, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax noncash gain of $153.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended AugustJuly 31, 2016. The Company classifies this as a Level 3 2014 in connection with the financial performance in certain of the Company’s Tommy Hilfigermeasurement. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” for a further discussion.

The Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all G. H. Bass & Co. (“Bass”) retail stores in North America. Fair value was determined based on the estimated future operating results reflecting poor year-to-date performance and current sales trends. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment.

In connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business in the fourth quarter of 2013 the Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all Bass retail stores included in the sale pursuant to the terms of noncancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2022. These guarantees include minimum rent payments and relate to leases that commenced prior to the sale of the Bass assets. In certain instances, the Company’s guarantee remains in effect when an option is exercised to extend the term of the lease. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations as of July 31, 2016, January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 was $1.6 million, $1.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, which was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. The Company classifies thisthese as a Level 3 measurement.measurements. The fair value of such guarantee obligations was determined using the discounted cash flow method, based on the guaranteed lease payments, the estimated probability of lease extensions and estimates of the risk of default by the buyer of the Bass assets, and was discounted using rates of return that account for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows.



The carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term borrowings and long-term debt as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, February 1, 2015January 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015 were as follows:

18




(In millions)8/2/15 2/1/15 8/3/147/31/16 1/31/16 8/2/15
Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair ValueCarrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
 
  
      
  
 
  
      
  
Cash and cash equivalents$466.7
 $466.7
 $479.3
 $479.3
 $461.1
 $461.1
$741.7
 $741.7
 $556.4
 $556.4
 $466.7
 $466.7
Short-term borrowings8.1
 8.1
 8.5
 8.5
 165.2
 165.2
19.4
 19.4
 25.9
 25.9
 8.1
 8.1
Long-term debt (including portion classified as current)3,373.9
 3,408.6
 3,538.0
 3,567.7
 3,742.2
 3,762.9
3,358.2
 3,434.6
 3,168.3
 3,190.5
 3,348.5
 3,408.6

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying valuesamounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt using quoted market prices as of the last business day of the applicable quarter. The Company classifies the measurement of its long-term debt as a Level 1 measurement. The carrying amounts of long-term debt reflect the unamortized portions of debt issuance costs and the original issue discounts.

12.13. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company grants stock-based awards under its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan replaced the Company’s 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan”) and certain other prior stock option plans. The 2003 Plan and theseThese other plans terminated upon the 2006 Plan’s initial stockholder approval in June 2006, other than with respect to outstanding options, which continued to be governed by the applicable prior plan. Only awards under the 2003 Plan continue to be outstanding insofar as these prior plans are concerned.2006. Shares issued as a result of stock-based compensation transactions generally have been funded with the issuance of new shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company may grant the following types of incentive awards under the 2006 PlanPlan: (i) non-qualified stock options (“NQs”); (ii) incentive stock options (“ISOs”); (iii) stock appreciation rights; (iv) restricted stock; (v) restricted stock units (“RSUs”); (vi) performance shares and performance share units (“PSUs”); and (vii) other stock-based awards. Each award granted under the 2006 Plan is subject to an award agreement that incorporates, as applicable, the exercise price, the term of the award, the periods of restriction, the number of shares to which the award pertains, applicable performance period(s)periods and performance measure(s),measures, and such other terms and conditions as the plan committee determines.

Through August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, the Company has granted under the 2006 Plan (i) service-based NQs, RSUs and restricted stock; (ii) contingently issuable PSUs; and (iii) RSUs that are intended to satisfy the performance-based condition for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. According to the terms of the 2006 Plan, for purposes of determining the number of shares available for grant, with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards discussed below, each share underlying a stock option award reduces the number available by one share and each share underlying a restricted stock award, RSU or PSU reduces the number available by two shares. Each share underlying a Warnaco employee replacement stock option, restricted stock, RSU or PSU reduces the number available by one share. The per share exercise price of options granted under the 2006 Plan cannot be less than the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant (the business day prior to the date of grant for awards granted prior to September 21, 2006).grant.

The Company currently has service-based NQs outstanding under the 2003 Plan. Such stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the business day immediately preceding the date of grant.

Under the terms of the merger agreement in connection with the Warnaco acquisition, each outstanding award of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units made by Warnaco was assumed by the Company in 2013 and converted into an award of the same type, and subject to the same terms and conditions, but payable in shares of Company common stock. The replacement stock options are generally exercisable in three equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of original grant and the replacement RSUs and restricted stock awards generally vest three years after the date of original grant, principally on a cliff basis. The Company accounted for the replacement awards as a modification of the existing awards. As such, a new fair value was assigned to the awards, a portion of which is included as part of the merger consideration. The merger consideration of $39.8 million was determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the Warnaco awards outstanding at the effective time of the Warnaco acquisition, net of the estimated value of awards to be forfeited, by the proportionate amount of the vesting period that had lapsed as of the acquisition date. The remaining fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, is being expensed over the awards’ remaining vesting periods.


19



Net income for the twenty-six weeks endedJuly 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014included $20.419.5 million and $24.420.4 million, respectively, of pre-tax expense related to stock-based compensation, with recognized income tax benefits of $5.0$5.8 million and $6.2$5.0 million, respectively.

Stock options currently outstanding with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards discussed above, are generally cumulatively exercisable in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. The vesting of such options outstanding is also generally accelerated upon retirement (as defined in the applicable plan)2006 Plan). Such options are generally granted with a 10-year10-year term.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The estimated fair value of the options, net of estimated forfeitures, is expensed over the options’ vesting periods.



The following summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of service-based stock options granted during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015:
Twenty-Six Weeks EndedTwenty-Six Weeks Ended
8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15
Weighted average risk-free interest rate1.54% 2.15%1.45% 1.54%
Weighted average expected option term (in years) 6.25
 6.25
6.25
 6.25
Weighted average Company volatility36.32% 44.12%34.64% 36.32%
Expected annual dividends per share $0.15
 $0.15
$0.15
 $0.15
Weighted average grant date fair value per option$40.23
 $56.21
$35.60
 $40.23

The risk-free interest rate is based on United States Treasury yields in effect at the date of grant for periods corresponding to the expected option term. The expected option term represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, based on vesting schedules and the contractual term of the options. Company volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period of time corresponding to the expected option term. Expected dividends are based on the Company’s common stock cash dividend rate at the date of grant.

The Company has continued to utilize the simplified method to estimate the expected term for its “plain vanilla” stock options granted due to a lack of relevant historical data resulting, in part, from changes in the pool of employees receiving option grants, mainly due to acquisitions. The Company will continue to evaluate the appropriateness of utilizing such method.

Service-based stock option activity for the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per option data)Options 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Per Option
Options 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Per Option
Outstanding at February 1, 20151,472
 $64.14
Outstanding at January 31, 20161,443
 $70.79
Granted172
 107.13
228
 99.27
Exercised109
 49.84
155
 65.82
Cancelled14
 107.57
6
 106.83
Outstanding at August 2, 20151,521
 $69.64
Exercisable at August 2, 20151,136
 $55.51
Outstanding at July 31, 20161,510
 $75.46
Exercisable at July 31, 20161,057
 $62.29

RSUs granted to employees with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards,in 2016 generally vest in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. Outstanding RSUs granted to employees prior to 2016 generally vest in three annual installments of 25%, 25% and 50% commencing two years after the date of grant. Service-based RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest in full one year after the date of grant. The underlying RSU award agreements (excluding agreements for non-employee director awards made during or after 2010)awards) generally provide for accelerated vesting upon the award recipient’s retirement (as defined in the 2006 Plan). The fair value of service-based RSUs with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards, is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is expensed, net of estimated forfeitures, over the RSUs’ vesting periods.


20



RSU activity for the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per RSU data)RSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSURSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU
Non-vested at February 1, 2015640
 $107.42
Non-vested at January 31, 2016653
 $111.61
Granted295
 104.53
381
 97.94
Vested195
 86.22
150
 108.67
Cancelled53
 113.53
45
 110.16
Non-vested at August 2, 2015687
 $111.73
Non-vested at July 31, 2016839
 $106.00

The Company’s restricted stock awards consist solely of awards to Warnaco employees that were replaced with the Company’s restricted stock as of the effective time of the acquisition. The fair value of restricted stock with respect to awards for which the vesting period had not lapsed as of the acquisition date was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 12, 2013 and is expensed, net of forfeitures, over the vesting period.

Restricted stock activity for the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)Restricted Stock Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Non-vested at February 1, 201520
 $120.72
  Granted—
 —
  Vested17
 120.72
  Cancelled1
 120.72
Non-vested at August 2, 20152
 $120.72

The Company granted contingently issuable PSUs to certain of the Company’s senior executives during the first quarter of each of 2012, 2013 and 2014. These awards were (are) subject to achievement of an earnings per share and, in the case of the awards made in 2012, a return on equity goal for the two-year performance period beginning with the year of grant and a service period of one year beyond the certification of performance. For the awards granted in the first quarter of 2014, the final number of shares that will be earned, if any, is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of goals for thetwo-year performance period has ended and the holders did not earn any shares based


on earnings per share growth duringover the performance cycle.period. For the awards granted in the first quarter of 2013, the two year performance period has ended and the holders earned an aggregate of 26 thousand shares, which will vest and be paid out subject to and following the additional one-year service period. The holders of the awards granted in the first quarter of 2012 earned an aggregate of 54 thousand26,000 shares, which were paid out in the first quarter of 2015.2016. For such awards, the Company recordsrecorded expense ratably over each applicable vesting period based on fair value and the Company’s current expectations of the probable number of shares that will ultimatelyto be issued. The fair value of these contingently issuable performance share units isPSUs was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, reduced for the present value of any dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the performance cycle, as these contingently issuable performance share units doPSUs did not accrue dividends prior to the completion of the performance cycle.

The Company granted contingently issuable PSUs to certain of the Company’s executives during the second quarter of 2013 and to certain of the Company’s senior executives during the first quarter of each of 2015 and 2016 subject to a three-year performance period of three years.period. For thesuch awards, granted in the second quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2015, the final number of shares that willto be earned, if any, is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of goals for the applicable performance period, of which 50 percent50% is based upon the Company’s absolute stock price growth during the applicable performance period and 50 percent50% is based upon the Company’s total shareholder return during the applicable performance period relative to other companies included in the S&P 500 as of the date of grant. For such awards, because the awards are subject to market conditions,granted in the second quarter of 2013, the performance period ended on May 5, 2016 and the holders did not earn any shares, as the Company did not achieve either of the threshold performance levels required for payout. The Company records expense ratably over the applicable vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied.satisfied because the awards are subject to market conditions. The fair value of the awards granted in the first quarter of 2016 and 2015 was established for each grant on the grant date using the Monte Carlo simulation model, which was based on the following assumptions:


21



2016 2015
Risk-free interest rate0.90%1.04% 0.90%
Expected Company volatility29.10%28.33% 29.10%
Expected annual dividends per share$0.15
$0.15
 $0.15
Grant date fair value per performance share unit$101.23
Weighted average grant date fair value per PSU$87.16
 $101.23

Certain of the awards granted in the first quarter of 2016 are subject to a holding period of one year after the vesting date. For such awards, the grant date fair value was discounted 12.99% for the restriction of liquidity.

Performance sharePSU activity for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)Performance Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Non-vested at February 1, 2015553
 $119.95
(In thousands, except per PSU data)PSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per PSU
Non-vested at January 31, 2016493
 $121.41
Granted46
 101.23
76
 87.16
Vested54
 88.52
26
 114.77
Cancelled45
 121.91
421
 124.01
Non-vested at August 2, 2015500
 $121.45
Non-vested at July 31, 2016122
 $92.42

The Company receives a tax deduction for certain transactions associated with its stock plan awards. The actual income tax benefits realized from these transactions for the twenty-six weeks endedJuly 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014were $9.0$5.8 million and $10.5$9.0 million, respectively. Of those amounts, $3.40.5 million and $4.63.4 million, respectively, were reported as excess tax benefits. Excess tax benefits arise when the actual tax benefit resulting from a stock plan award transaction exceeds the tax benefit associated with the grant date fair value of the related stock award.

13.

14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOMELOSS

The following table presents the changes in AOCI,AOCL, net of related taxes, by component for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016:


(In millions)		Foreign currency translation adjustments Retirement liability adjustment Net unrealized and realized gain on effective hedges Total
Balance, February 1, 2015$(496.2) $0.4
 $79.3
 $(416.5)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(140.1) —
 22.1
 (118.0)
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCI—
 0.1
 45.3
 45.4
Other comprehensive loss(140.1) (0.1) (23.2) (163.4)
Balance at August 2, 2015$(636.3) $0.3
 $56.1
 $(579.9)

(In millions)		Foreign currency translation adjustments Retirement liability adjustment Net unrealized and realized gain (loss) on effective cash flow hedges Total
Balance, January 31, 2016$(730.5) $0.1
 $26.2
 $(704.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications84.7
 —
 (35.2) 49.5
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCL—
 0.1
 2.8
 2.9
Net gain on net investment hedge4.9
 —
 —
 4.9
Other comprehensive income (loss)89.6
 (0.1) (38.0) 51.5
Balance, July 31, 2016$(640.9) $0.0
 $(11.8) $(652.7)

The following table presents the changes in AOCI,AOCL, net of related taxes, by component for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014:

2, 2015:

(In millions)		Foreign currency translation adjustments Retirement liability adjustment Net unrealized and realized loss on effective hedges Total
Balance, February 2, 2014$50.1
 $1.0
 $(8.8) $42.3
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications7.6
 —
 0.0
 7.6
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCI(2.0) 0.2
 (8.0) (9.8)
Other comprehensive income (loss)9.6
 (0.2) 8.0
 17.4
Balance at August 3, 2014$59.7
 $0.8
 $(0.8) $59.7

(In millions)		Foreign currency translation adjustments Retirement liability adjustment Net unrealized and realized gain on effective cash flow hedges Total
Balance, February 1, 2015$(496.2) $0.4
 $79.3
 $(416.5)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(140.1) —
 22.1
 (118.0)
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCL—
 0.1
 45.3
 45.4
Other comprehensive loss(140.1) (0.1) (23.2) (163.4)
Balance, August 2, 2015$(636.3) $0.3
 $56.1
 $(579.9)


22



The following table presents reclassifications out of AOCIAOCL to earnings for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 2014:2, 2015:

(In millions)		Amount Reclassified from AOCIAffected Line Item in the Company’s Consolidated Income StatementsAmount Reclassified from AOCLAffected Line Item in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements
Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 
8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/14 7/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15 
Realized gain (loss) on effective hedges:        
Realized gain (loss) on effective cash flow hedges:        
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts$27.5
 $(2.1) $48.1
 $(5.5)Cost of goods sold$3.5
 $27.5
 $8.2
 $48.1
Cost of goods sold
Interest rate contracts(1.1) (1.7) (2.2) (3.6)Interest expense(2.7) (1.1) (5.1) (2.2)Interest expense
Less: Tax effect0.3
 (0.4) 0.6
 (1.1)Income tax expense (benefit)0.4
 0.3
 0.3
 0.6
Income tax expense
Total, net of tax$26.1
 $(3.4) $45.3
 $(8.0) $0.4
 $26.1
 $2.8
 $45.3
 
                
Amortization of retirement liability items:                
Prior service credit$0.1
 $0.2
 $0.2
 $0.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses$0.1
 $0.1
 $0.2
 $0.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Less: Tax effect0.1
 0.1
 0.1
 0.2
Income tax expense (benefit)0.1
 0.1 0.1
 0.1
Income tax expense
Total, net of tax$0.0
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $0.2
 $0.0
 $0.0
 $0.1
 $0.1
 
        
Foreign currency translation adjustments:        
Deconsolidation of foreign subsidiaries and joint venture$—
 $—
 $—
 $(2.0)Selling, general and administrative expenses
Less: Tax effect—
 —
 —
 —
Income tax expense (benefit)
Total, net of tax$—
 $—
 $—
 $(2.0) 
        

14.


15. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $500.0 million three-year stock repurchase program effective June 3, 2015. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time over the period through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions or other methods, as the Company deems appropriate. Purchases are made based on a variety of factors, such as price, corporate requirements and overall market conditions, applicable legal requirements and limitations, restrictions under the Company’s debt arrangements, trading restrictions under the CompanyCompany’s insider trading policy and other relevant factors. The program may be modified, including to increase or decrease the repurchase limitation or extend, suspend, or terminate the program, by the Company at any time, without prior notice.

During the second quarter of 2015,twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016, the Company purchased approximately 0.11.4 million shares of its common stock in open market transactions for $15.0$129.2 million (2.8 million shares for $255.4 million since inception) under the program. As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, the repurchased shares were held as treasury stock and $485.0$244.6 million of the authorization remained available for future share repurchases.

Treasury stock activity also includes shares that were withheld in conjunction with the settlement of vested restricted stock unitsRSUs, PSUs and restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding requirements.


23



15. EXIT ACTIVITY COSTS

Izod Retail Exit Costs

In connection with the Company’s exit in 2015 of the Izod retail business, the Company incurred certain costs related to severance and termination benefits, long-lived asset and goodwill impairments and lease/contract terminations. Such costs were as follows:

(In millions)Total Expected to be Incurred Incurred During the Thirteen Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Incurred During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Cumulative Incurred To Date
Severance, termination benefits and other costs$11.4
 $2.1
 $5.6
 $8.0
Long-lived asset and goodwill impairments17.7
 —
 —
 17.7
Lease/contract termination and related costs5.9
 3.9
 5.3
 5.3
Total$35.0
 $6.0
 $10.9
 $31.0

The above charges relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Heritage Brands Retail segment. Please see Note 18, “Segment Data” for a further discussion of the Company’s reportable segments.

The liabilities at August 2, 2015 related to these costs were principally recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and were as follows:

(In millions)Liability at 2/1/15 Costs Incurred During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Costs Paid During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Liability at 8/2/15
Severance, termination benefits and other costs$2.3
 $5.6
 $2.3
 $5.6
Lease/contract termination and related costs—
 5.3
 5.2
 0.1
Total$2.3
 $10.9
 $7.5
 $5.7

Warnaco Integration Costs

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco during the first quarter of 2013 and the related integration, the Company incurred certain costs (credits) related to severance and termination benefits, inventory liquidations and lease/contract terminations. Such costs (credits) were as follows:
(In millions)Total Expected to be Incurred Incurred During the Thirteen Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Incurred During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Cumulative Incurred To Date
Severance, termination benefits and other costs$165.0
 $5.3
 $8.8
 $164.0
Inventory liquidation costs36.1
 —
 —
 36.1
Lease/contract termination and related costs (credits)75.0
 (2.9) 0.8
 68.1
Total$276.1
 $2.4
 $9.6
 $268.2

Of the charges for severance and termination benefits, lease/contract termination and other costs incurred during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015, $1.9 million relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Calvin Klein North America segment, $(0.2) million relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Calvin Klein International segment, $3.2 million relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment and $4.7 million relate to corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. The remaining charges for severance and termination benefits, lease/contract termination and other costs expected to be incurred relate principally to the aforementioned

24



segments and corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. Please see Note 18, “Segment Data” for a further discussion of the Company’s reportable segments.

The liabilities at August 2, 2015 related to these costs were principally recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and were as follows:

(In millions)Liability at 2/1/15 Costs Incurred During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Costs Paid During the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 8/2/15 Liability at 8/2/15
Severance, termination benefits and other costs$14.0
 $8.8
 $14.5
 $8.3
Lease/contract termination and related costs7.6
 0.8
 4.8
 3.6
Total$21.6
 $9.6
 $19.3
 $11.9

16. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

The Company computed its basic and diluted net income per common share as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In millions, except per share data)8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
              
Net income attributable to PVH Corp.$102.2
 $126.5
 $216.3
 $161.8
$90.5
 $102.2
 $322.1
 $216.3
              
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic net income per common share82.7
 82.3
 82.6
 82.3
80.7
 82.7
 81.0
 82.6
Weighted average impact of dilutive securities0.8
 0.9
 0.8
 0.9
0.6
 0.8
 0.6
 0.8
Total shares for diluted net income per common share83.5
 83.2
 83.4
 83.2
81.3
 83.5
 81.6
 83.4
              
Basic net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.$1.24
 $1.54
 $2.62
 $1.97
$1.12
 $1.24
 $3.98
 $2.62
              
Diluted net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.$1.22
 $1.52
 $2.59
 $1.94
$1.11
 $1.22
 $3.95
 $2.59

Potentially dilutive securities excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share as the effect would be anti-dilutive were as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks EndedThirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In millions)8/2/15 8/3/14 8/2/15 8/3/147/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15
              
Weighted average potentially dilutive securities0.6
 0.4
 0.6
 0.4
1.0
 0.6
 1.0
 0.6

Shares underlying contingently issuable awards that have not met the necessary conditions as of the end of a reporting period are not included in the calculation of diluted net income per common share for that period. The Company had contingently issuable awards outstanding that did not meet the performance conditions as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015 and, therefore, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014.2015. The maximum number of potentially dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting for such awards was 0.80.2 million and 1.00.8 million as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015, respectively. These amounts were also excluded from the computation of weighted average potentially dilutive securities in the table above.



17. NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

During the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015, the Company recorded increases to goodwill of $$22.023.6 million and $22.722.0 million, respectively, related to liabilities incurred for contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein. Such amounts are not due or paid in cash until 45 days subsequent to the Company’s applicable quarter end. As such, during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 and August 3, 20142, 2015, the Company paid $23.9$25.2 million and $24.0$23.9 million, respectively, in cash related to contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein that were recorded as additions to goodwill during the periods the liabilities were incurred.


25Omitted from purchases of property, plant and equipment in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks endedJuly 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 are $2.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of assets acquired through capital leases.

Omitted from acquisition of treasury shares in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 is $2.0 million of shares repurchased under the stock repurchase program for which the trade occurred but remained unsettled as of July 31, 2016.

During the firstsecond quarter of 2014,2016, the Company recorded a loss of $17.5$11.2 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment and restatement of the 2013 facilities and the related redemption of its 7 3/8% senior notes due 2020.credit facilities.

Omitted from purchasesDuring the first quarter of property, plant and equipment2016, the Company completed the acquisition of TH China. Included in the Consolidated Statementacquisition consideration was the elimination of Cash Flows fora $2.8 million pre-acquisition receivable owed to the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014 are $3.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of assets acquired through capital leases.Company by TH China. 

Omitted from investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 are noncash increases in the investment balances related to the Company’s Calvin Klein Australia joint venture and Calvin Klein India joint venture of $3.7 million and $6.2 million, respectively, resulting from the deconsolidation of these entities. Please see Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” and Note 5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” for a further discussion.

18. SEGMENT DATA

The Company manages its operations through its operating divisions, which are presented as six reportable segments: (i) Calvin Klein North America; (ii) Calvin Klein International; (iii) Tommy Hilfiger North America; (iv) Tommy Hilfiger International; (v) Heritage Brands Wholesale; and (vi) Heritage Brands Retail.

Calvin Klein North America Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Calvin Klein North America division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Calvin Klein branded apparel and related products at wholesale in North America, primarily to department and specialty stores;stores and e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers; (ii) operating retail stores, which are primarily located in premium outlet centers in North America, and e-commerce websitessites in North America, which sell Calvin Klein branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the brand names Calvin Klein, Collection, Calvin Klein Collection (platinum label) and Calvin Klein (white label)Platinum for a broad array of products and retail services in North America.

Calvin Klein International Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Calvin Klein International division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Calvin Klein branded apparel and related products at wholesale principally in Europe, Asia and Brazil, primarily to department and specialty stores, e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers, franchisees of Calvin Klein, distributors and licensees; (ii) operating retail stores and e-commerce websitessites in Europe, Asia and Brazil, which sell Calvin Klein branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the brand names Calvin Klein Collection, Calvin Klein Platinum (platinum label) and Calvin Klein (white label) for a broad array of products and retail services outside of North America. This segment also includes the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investments in unconsolidated Calvin Klein foreign affiliates in Australia and India.

Tommy Hilfiger North America Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger North America division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel and related products at wholesale in North America, primarily to department stores, principally Macy’s, Inc. and Hudson’s Bay Company;Company, as well as e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers; (ii) operating retail stores, which are primarily located in premium outlet centers in North America, and e-commerce websitessites in North America, which sell Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the Tommy Hilfiger brand name for a broad array of products in North America.

Tommy Hilfiger International Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger International division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel and related products at wholesale principally in Europe and China, primarily to department and specialty stores, e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers, franchisees of Tommy Hilfiger, distributors and licensees; (ii) operating


retail stores in Europe, China and Japan and international e-commerce websites,sites, which sell Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the Tommy Hilfiger brand name for a broad array of products outside of North America. This segment also includes the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investments in unconsolidated Tommy Hilfiger foreign affiliates in Brazil, China, India and Australia. This segment included the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investment in TH China until April 13, 2016, on which date the Company acquired the remaining interests that it did not already own and began to consolidate the operations as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” for a further discussion.

Heritage Brands Wholesale Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Heritage Brands wholesaleWholesale division. This segment derives revenue primarily from the marketing to department, chain and specialty stores and, to a lesser extent, e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers in North America of (i) dress shirts, neckwear and underwear under various owned and licensed brand names, including several private label brands; (ii) men’s sportswear principally under the brand names Van Heusen, IZOD and ARROW; (iii) swimwear, fitness apparel, swim accessories and related products under the brand name Speedo; and (iv) women’s intimate apparel under the brand names

26



Warner’s and Olga. This segment also includes the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investment in its unconsolidated Heritage Brands foreign affiliate in Australia.

Heritage Brands Retail Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Heritage Brands retailRetail division. This segment derives revenue principally from operating retail stores, primarily located in outlet centers in North America, which primarily sell apparel, accessories and related products under the brand names Van Heusen and IZOD. DuringThe Company exited the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company announced its plan to exit its Izod retail business byin the endthird quarter of 2015.2015 but continues to sell a limited selection of IZOD Golf apparel in some of its Van Heusen retail stores. The Company also sells Warner’s products on a limited basis in some of its Van Heusen retail stores.


27



The following tables present summarized information by segment:
Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 
(In millions)8/2/15
(1) 
8/3/14 8/2/15
(1) 
8/3/14 7/31/16 8/2/15 7/31/16 8/2/15 
Revenue – Calvin Klein North America                
Net sales $317.6
 $333.0
 $616.9
 $634.6
 $361.3
 $317.6
 $700.1
 $616.9
 
Royalty revenue 29.5
 23.6
 59.2
 49.1
 28.0
 29.5
 58.3
 59.2
 
Advertising and other revenue 11.1
 9.4
 20.9
 19.9
 8.7
 11.1
 20.2
 20.9
 
Total 358.2
 366.0
 697.0
 703.6
 398.0
 358.2
 778.6
 697.0
 
                
Revenue – Calvin Klein International                
Net sales264.8
 284.8

556.4
 585.0
 306.2
 264.8

622.5
 556.4
 
Royalty revenue18.3
 17.0
 36.0
 36.4
 16.8
 18.3
 35.4
 36.0
 
Advertising and other revenue7.3
 6.8
 13.1
 14.9
 5.4
 7.3
 12.6
 13.1
 
Total290.4
 308.6
 605.5
 636.3
 328.4
 290.4
 670.5
 605.5
 
                
Revenue – Tommy Hilfiger North America                
Net sales 384.8
 387.0
 726.3
 741.2
 396.0
 384.8
 717.1
 726.3
 
Royalty revenue 9.9
 6.3
 19.5
 12.3
 9.2
 9.9
 20.2
 19.5
 
Advertising and other revenue 2.6
 1.8
 5.4
 4.0
 2.2
 2.6
 4.7
 5.4
 
Total 397.3
 395.1
 751.2
 757.5
 407.4
 397.3
 742.0
 751.2
 
                
Revenue – Tommy Hilfiger International                
Net sales 400.2
 461.1
 800.4
 945.7
 442.1
 400.2
 886.7
 800.4
 
Royalty revenue 12.3
 13.5
 24.4
 27.5
 10.1
 12.3
 21.7
 24.4
 
Advertising and other revenue 0.9
 0.7
 1.8
 2.1
 0.6
 0.9
 1.6
 1.8
 
Total 413.4
 475.3
 826.6
 975.3
 452.8
 413.4
 910.0
 826.6
 
                
Revenue – Heritage Brands Wholesale                
Net sales308.0
 331.1
 675.5
 686.0
 270.7
 308.0
 609.9
 675.5
 
Royalty revenue4.8
 4.2
 9.4
 8.1
 5.2
 4.8
 10.2
 9.4
 
Advertising and other revenue0.8
 0.9
 1.4
 1.4
 1.1
 0.8
 1.8
 1.4
 
Total313.6
 336.2
 686.3
 695.5
 277.0
 313.6
 621.9
 686.3
 
                
Revenue – Heritage Brands Retail                
Net sales90.5
 93.5
 175.5
 169.5
 69.1
 90.5
 126.8
 175.5
 
Royalty revenue0.6
 0.7
 1.1
 1.3
 0.6
 0.6
 1.2
 1.1
 
Advertising and other revenue0.0
 0.2
 0.1
 0.3
 0.0
 0.0
 0.1
 0.1
 
Total91.1
 94.4
 176.7
 171.1
 69.7
 91.1
 128.1
 176.7
 
                
Total Revenue                
Net sales 1,765.9
 1,890.5
 3,551.0
 3,762.0
 1,845.4
 1,765.9
 3,663.1
 3,551.0
 
Royalty revenue 75.4
 65.3
 149.6
 134.7
 69.9
 75.4
 147.0
 149.6
 
Advertising and other revenue 22.7
 19.8
 42.7
 42.6
 18.0
 22.7
 41.0
 42.7
 
Total $1,864.0
 $1,975.6
 $3,743.3
 $3,939.3
 $1,933.3
 $1,864.0
 $3,851.1
 $3,743.3
 

(1)
Revenue for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was significantly impacted by the strengthening of the United States dollar against other currencies in which the Company transacts significant levels of business. Please see section entitled “Results of Operations” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 2 of this report for a further discussion.


28





Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended 
(In millions)8/2/15
(1) 
 8/3/14 8/2/15
(1) 
 8/3/14
7/31/16
(1) 
 8/2/15
(1) 
 7/31/16
(1) 
 8/2/15
(1) 
Income before interest and taxes – Calvin Klein North America$46.1
(3) 
 $55.3
(8) 
 $86.5
(4) 
 $96.4
(9) 
$55.2
 $46.1
(11) 
 $93.3
(7)(10) 
 $86.5
(12) 
                
Income before interest and taxes – Calvin Klein International34.7
(3) 
 14.6
(8) 
 84.0
(4) 
 47.4
(9)(10) 
50.5
 34.7
(11) 
 102.7
(7)(10) 
 84.0
(12) 
                
Income before interest and taxes – Tommy Hilfiger North America58.8
 65.3
 89.1
 105.5
 46.1
(3) 
 58.8
 69.1
(3) 
 89.1
 
                
Income before interest and taxes – Tommy Hilfiger International38.9
 50.3
 100.7
 125.3
 29.5
(4) 
 38.9
 212.8
(5) 
 100.7
 
                
Income before interest and taxes – Heritage Brands Wholesale17.3
(3)(5) 
 23.9
(8) 
 47.6
(4)(5) 
 50.9
(9) 
8.3
 17.3
(11)(13) 
 36.2
(7)(8) 
 47.6
(12)(13) 
                
(Loss) income before interest and taxes – Heritage Brands Retail(2.7)
(6) 
 1.3
 (2.8)
(6) 
 (1.9) 
Income (loss) before interest and taxes – Heritage Brands Retail3.7
 (2.7)
(14) 
 5.8
 (2.8)
(14) 
                
Loss before interest and taxes – Corporate(2)
(39.0)
(3)(7) 
 (51.4)
(8) 

(74.2)
(4)(7) 
 (179.8)
(9)(11) 
(50.3)
(6)(9) 
 (39.0)
(11)(15) 

(82.3)
(7)(9) 
 (74.2)
(12)(15) 
                
Income before interest and taxes$154.1
 $159.3
 $330.9
 $243.8
 $143.0
 $154.1
 $437.6
 $330.9
 

(1) 
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 was significantly impacted by the strengthening of the United States dollar against otherforeign currencies in which the Company transacts significant levels of business. Please see section entitled “Results of Operations” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 2 of this report for a further discussion.

(2) 
Includes corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments, as well as the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investment in Karl Lagerfeld.Lagerfeld and the results of PVH Ethiopia. Corporate expenses represent overhead operating expenses and include expenses for senior corporate management, corporate finance, information technology related to corporate infrastructure and actuarial gains and losses from the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans (which are generally recorded in the fourth quarter).

(3) 
Income before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to the licensing to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. of the Tommy Hilfiger womenswear wholesale business in the United States and Canada.

(4)
Income before interest and taxes for the thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $20.3 million associated with the Company’s acquisition of the 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that it did not already own, principally related to valuation adjustments and amortization of short-lived assets.

(5)
Income before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 included a noncash gain of $153.1 million to write-up the Company’s equity investment in TH China to fair value in connection with the acquisition of the 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that it did not already own. Partially offsetting the gain were acquisition related costs of $44.5 million, principally related to valuation adjustments and amortization of short-lived assets, and a one-time cost of $5.9 million recorded on the Company’s equity investment in TH China. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” for a further discussion.

(6)
Loss before interest and taxes for the thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $2.3 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring.

(7)
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the thirteentwenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015 includes July 31, 2016 included costs of $13.1$9.8 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs (credits) were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $$0.2 million in Calvin Klein North America; $2.6 million in Calvin Klein International; $0.4 million in Heritage Brands Wholesale; and $6.6 million in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(8)
Income before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $2.6 million related to the discontinuation of several licensed product lines in the Company’s Heritage Brands dress furnishings business.



(9)
Loss before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $15.8 million related to the Company’s amendment of its credit facilities. Please see Note 9, “Debt,” for a further discussion.

(10)
Income before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 included costs of $5.5 million associated with the restructuring related to the new global creative strategy for 0.8Calvin Klein announced in April 2016. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $2.7 million in Calvin Klein North America; and $2.8 million in Calvin Klein International.

(11)
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2015 included costs of $13.1 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs (income) were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $0.8 million in Calvin Klein North America; $(0.2) million in Calvin Klein International; $2.1$2.1 million in Heritage Brands Wholesale; and $10.4$10.4 million in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(4)(12) 
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 includesincluded costs of $31.9 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $2.9 million in Calvin Klein North America; $3.7 million in Calvin Klein International; $5.7 million in Heritage Brands Wholesale; and $19.6 million in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(5)(13) 
Income before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 includesincluded costs of $3.3 million related to exiting variousthe discontinuation of several licensed product lines in the Company’s Heritage Brands dress furnishings business.

(6)
(Loss) income before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 includes costs of $5.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively, related to operating and exiting the Company’s Izod retail business.

(7)(14) 
Loss before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 includesincluded costs of $5.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively, related to the operation of and exit from the Company’s Izod retail business.

(15)
Loss before interest and taxes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 included a one-time gain of $2.2 million recorded in connection with the Company’s 10% economic interestequity investment in Karl Lagerfeld.

(8)
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the thirteen weeks ended August 3, 2014 includes costs of $44.0 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $3.7 million in Calvin Klein North America; $12.1 million in Calvin Klein International;

29



$4.3 million in Heritage Brands Wholesale; and $23.9 million in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(9)
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 includes costs of $76.6 million associated with the Company’s integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $8.7 million in Calvin Klein North America; $23.3 million in Calvin Klein International; $8.3 million in Heritage Brands Wholesale; and $36.3 million in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(10)
Income before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 includes a net gain of $8.0 million associated with the deconsolidation of certain Calvin Klein subsidiaries in Australia and the Company’s previously consolidated Calvin Klein joint venture in India. Please refer to Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” and Note 5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest” for a further discussion.

(11)
Loss before interest and taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 includes costs of $93.1 million associated with the Company’s amendment and restatement of the 2013 facilities and the related redemption of its 7 3/8% senior notes due 2020. Please refer to Note 8, “Debt,” for a further discussion.

Intersegment transactions primarily consist of transfers of inventory principally from the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment to the Heritage Brands Retail segment, and the Calvin Klein North America segment and the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment. These transfers are recorded at cost plus a standard markup percentage. Such markup percentage on ending inventory is eliminated principally in the Heritage Brands Retail segment and the Calvin Klein North America segment.

19. GUARANTEES

The Company guaranteed to a landlord the payment of rent and related costs by the tenant currently occupying space previously leased by the Company. The maximum amount guaranteed as oflease payments for substantially all August 2, 2015Bass was approximately $3.7 million, which is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. The Company has the right to seek recourse of approximately $2.3 million as of August 2, 2015, which is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. The guarantee expires on May 19, 2016. The estimated fair value of this guarantee obligation was immaterial as of August 2, 2015.

In connection withretail stores included in the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business in the fourth quarter of 2013 the Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all Bass retail stores included in the sale pursuant to the terms of noncancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2022. These guarantees include minimum rent payments and relate to leases that commenced prior to the sale of the Bass assets. In certain instances, the Company’s guarantee remains in effect when an option is exercised to extend the term of the lease. The maximum amount guaranteed for all leases as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was $51.3$34.3 million and the Company has the right to seek recourse from the buyer of the Bass assets for the full amount. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations as of July 31, 2016, January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, February 1, 2015 and August 3, 2014 was $2.61.6 million, $3.0$1.9 million and $3.5$2.6 million, respectively, which was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Please see Note 12, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a further discussion.

In connection with the Company’s investments in PVH Australia and CK India, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the entities’ debt and other obligations. The maximum amount guaranteed as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was approximately $7.9 million, which is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. The guarantees are in effect for the entire terms of the respective obligations. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations was immaterial as of July 31, 2016, January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015.

The Company has certain other guarantees whereby it guaranteed the payment of amounts on behalf of certain other parties, none of which are material individually or in the aggregate.



20. RECENT ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

The FASB issued in May 2014 guidance that supersedes most of the current revenue recognition requirements. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. New disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers are also required. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one year delay to the required adoption date of the standard, which makes it effective for the Company no later than the first quarter of 2018, with adoption in 2017 permitted. In 2016, the FASB issued final amendments to clarify the implementation guidance related to principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations and the accounting for licenses of intellectual property. The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has not yet selected a

30


transition method and is currently evaluating the standard to determine the impact of its adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued in November 2015 an update to accounting guidance to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. The guidance requires an entity to classify all deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance during the fourth quarter of 2015 on a retrospective basis, which resulted in decreases to other current assets of $96.0 million and other liabilities of $87.5 million and an increase to other assets of $8.5 million as of August 2, 2015.
The FASB issued in April 2015 an update to accounting guidance related to debt issuance costs. The guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. ThisThe Company adopted this guidance is effective for the Company induring the first quarter of 2016 with early adoption permitted. Retrospective applicationon a retrospective basis, which resulted in decreases to prepaid expenses of the new guidance is required. Had the Company early adopted this guidance, other current assets/$8.1 million and $8.1 million as of January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, respectively, and other assets would have been lower by $25.4 million, $28.3of $14.5 million and $31.0$17.3 million as of January 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, respectively, both with corresponding decreases in debt as of August 2, 2015, February 1, 2015 and August 3, 2014, respectively.debt.

The FASB issued in April 2015 an update to accounting guidance related to retirement benefits. This guidance provides a practical expedient which allows a company with fiscal years that do not fall on a calendar month-end to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month end that is closest to the company’s fiscal year end. If elected, this guidance should be applied consistently from year to year for all plans. ThisThe guidance will bebecame effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2016, with early adoption permitted.2016. Prospective application is required. The Company does not currently anticipate changing its measurement date under this guidance.

The FASB issued in July 2015 an update to accounting guidance to simplify the measurement of inventory. Currently, all inventory is measured at the lower of cost or market. The new guidance requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope of the guidance at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The new guidance does not apply to inventory measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory methods. This guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2017, with early adoption permitted. Prospective application is required. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued in January 2016 an update to accounting guidance for the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The new guidance requires equity investments that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income and updates certain presentation and disclosure requirements. The guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018 with limited early application permitted. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued in February 2016 a new accounting standard on leases. The new standard, among other changes, will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in the balance sheet for all leases. The lease liability will be measured at the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. The right-of-use asset will be measured at the lease liability amount, adjusted for lease prepayments, lease incentives received and the lessee’s initial direct costs (e.g., commissions). The guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019 with early application permitted. The adoption will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the standard to determine the impact of itsthe adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements but expects that it will result in a significant increase to its other assets and other liabilities.



The FASB issued in March 2016 an update to accounting guidance to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2017, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the standard to determine the impact of the adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


31
21.    OTHER

On May 19, 2016, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Grupo Axo, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (“Grupo Axo”) to form a joint venture that will license from wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company the rights to distribute in Mexico certain Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Warner’s, Olga and Speedo brand products. The joint venture will be formed by merging the wholly owned Mexico subsidiary of the Company that operates the Calvin Klein and Heritage Brands businesses in Mexico with the wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo Axo that distributes TommyHilfiger brand products in Mexico. In connection with this contribution, the Company would deconsolidate its Mexico subsidiary and, as a result, it may recognize a gain or loss on such transaction. The gain or loss would be measured as the difference between the fair value of the retained equity method interest and the sum of (i) the carrying value of the net assets of the subsidiary, including any foreign currency translation adjustments recorded in AOCL, and (ii) the cash contributed to the joint venture. The closing is subject to closing conditions, including regulatory approval.




ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We aggregate our reporting segments into three main businesses: (i) Calvin Klein, which consists of the businesses we operate under our Calvin Klein trademarks; (ii) Tommy Hilfiger, which consists of the businesses we operate under our Tommy Hilfiger trademarks; and (iii) Heritage Brands, which consists of the businesses we operate under our Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner’s and Olga trademarks, the Speedo trademark we license in perpetuity for North America and the Caribbean, and other owned and licensed trademarks. References to the brand names Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner’s, Olga and Speedo and to other brand names are to registered trademarks owned by us or licensed to us by third parties and are identified by italicizing the brand name.

References to the acquisition of Warnaco refer to our February 13, 2013 acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which we refer to collectively as “Warnaco.”


OVERVIEW

The following discussion and analysis is intended to help you understand us, our operations and our financial performance. It should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, which are included in the immediately preceding item of this report.

We are one of the largest branded apparel companies in the world, with a heritagehistory dating back over 130 years. Our brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brand names, including Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Speedo (licensed in perpetuity for North America and the Caribbean from Speedo International Limited)Ltd.), Warner’s and Olga. We also license brands from third parties primarily for use on dress shirts neckwear and to a lesser extent, underwearneckwear offered in the United States and Canada. We announced in January 2015 that we will exitexited our Izod retail business byin the endthird quarter of 2015.

Our business strategy is to manage and market a portfolio of nationally and internationally recognized apparel and lifestyle brandssell our branded products at multiple price points and acrossin multiple channels of distribution and geographies. We believe this approach reducesregions, which allows us to provide products to a broad range of consumers, while minimizing competition among our brands and reducing reliance on any one demographic group, merchandise preference, price point, distribution channel or geographic region. We also license our brands to third parties for product categories and in jurisdictions where we believe our partners’ expertise can better serve our businesses.

On February 1, 2016, we entered into a licensing agreement with G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (“G-III”) for the design, production and wholesale distribution of Tommy Hilfiger womenswear in the United States and Canada, which will result in the discontinuation of our directly operated Tommy Hilfiger North America womenswear wholesale business in the fourth quarter of 2016.

On April 13, 2016, we completed the acquisition of the 55% of the ownership interests in TH Asia, Ltd. (“TH China”), our joint venture for Tommy Hilfiger in China, that we did not already own (the “TH China acquisition”). As a result of the TH China acquisition, we now operate directly our Tommy Hilfiger business in its fastest growing market. The total consideration for the acquisition was $161 million, net of cash acquired of $105 million.

On May 19, 2016, we announced that we had entered into an agreement to form a joint venture in Mexico to which we would contribute our wholly owned subsidiary that operates and manages our Calvin Klein and Heritage Brands businesses in Mexico. In connection with this contribution, we would deconsolidate the subsidiary and, as a result, we may recognize a gain or loss on such transaction. The gain or loss would be measured as the difference between the fair value of the retained equity method interest and the sum of (i) the carrying value of the net assets of the subsidiary, including any foreign currency translation adjustments recorded in AOCL, and (ii) the cash contributed to the joint venture. The closing is subject to closing conditions, including regulatory approval. 

On June 20, 2016, we issued €350 million euro-denominated principal amount of 3 5/8% senior notes due July 15, 2024. Please see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

On June 29, 2016, we, along with our minority interest partner, formed a joint venture in Ethiopia, PVH Arvind Manufacturing Private Limited Company (“PVH Ethiopia”), in which we own a 75% interest. We made an initial contribution of $0.2 million to PVH Ethiopia at formation and have consolidated the joint venture in our consolidated financial statements. PVH Ethiopia was formed to operate a manufacturing facility that will produce finished products for us for distribution primarily in the United States. We expect the manufacturing facility will begin operations in 2017.




OPERATIONS OVERVIEW

We generate net sales from (i) the wholesale distribution to retailers, franchisees, licensees and distributors of dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, jeanswear, underwear, intimate apparel, swim products, and, to a lesser extent, handbags, footwear, accessories and other related products under owned and licensed trademarks, including through e-commerce sites operated by key department store customers and pure play e-commerce retailers, and (ii) the sale through (a) approximately 1,5001,550 Company-operated free-standing retail store locations worldwide under our Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger,and Van Heusen and IZOD trademarks, (b) overapproximately 1,100 Company-operated concessions/shop-in-shops worldwide under our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfigertrademarks, and (c) e-commerce websitessites in certain regionscountries under our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger trademarks, of apparel, footwear, accessories and other products, and swimwear and related products in North America through our SpeedoSpeedoUSA.com e-commerce website.site. We also operated IZOD retail stores through the end of the third quarter of 2015, at which time we completed the exit from the business. Additionally, we generate royalty, advertising and other revenue from fees for licensing the use of our trademarks.

We recorded pre-tax charges in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014 principally inIn connection with the Warnaco integration and restructuring that totaled $33 million and $80 million, respectively. We also recorded pre-tax debt modification and extinguishment charges in the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 that totaled $93 million. WeTH China acquisition, we recorded a net pre-tax gain of $8$103 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 resulting from the deconsolidationJuly 31, 2016, including a noncash gain of certain Calvin Klein subsidiaries in Australia$153 million to write-up our existing equity investment to fair value and New Zealandcosts of $50 million, a portion of which was noncash and our previously consolidated Calvin Klein joint venture in India (please referrelated to Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates”valuation adjustments and Note 5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1amortization of this report for a further discussion).short-lived assets. We expect to incur additional pre-tax charges of approximately $26$33 million during the remainder of 20152016, primarily consisting of noncash amortization of short-lived assets.

We recorded pre-tax charges principally in connection with the Warnaco integration and related restructuring. Our future resultsrestructuring that totaled $10 million and $30 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, respectively. We expect to incur additional pre-tax charges of operations will continue to be significantly impacted byapproximately $2 million during the Warnaco acquisition, particularly through the operationsremainder of the Calvin Klein business.2016.

In JanuaryWe implemented initiatives in 2015 we announcedto rationalize the closure ofHeritage Brands business, including the exit from our Izod retail business with(completed in the closing expected to be completed bythird quarter of 2015) and the enddiscontinuation in 2015 of 2015.several licensed product lines in the dress furnishings business. We recorded pre-tax charges of $7$6 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 in connection with operatingthe operation of and exitingexit from our Izod retail business. We recorded pre-tax charges of $3 million in each of the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 related to the discontinuation of several licensed product lines in the dress furnishings business.

We recorded pre-tax charges of $3 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 in connection with the licensing to G-III of the Tommy Hilfiger womenswear wholesale business in the United States and Canada and expect to incur additional pre-tax charges of approximately $8$1 million during the remainder of 2015.2016.


We also recorded pre-tax charges of $6 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 in connection with the restructuring associated with the new global creative strategy for Calvin Klein announced in April 2016.

32

We amended our senior secured credit facilities on May 19, 2016 and recorded pre-tax debt modification and extinguishment charges of $16 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016. Please see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.


Our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses each have substantial international components whichthat expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Amounts recorded in local foreign currencies are translated back to United States dollars using an average exchange rate over the representative period. Our international revenue and profit isearnings are unfavorably impacted during times of a strengthening United States dollar against the foreign currencies in which we generate significant revenue and earnings and favorably impacted during times of a weakening United States dollar. The United
States dollar has strengthened recently against certain major currencies, particularly the euro, which is the foreign currency in which we transact the most business.those currencies. In 2014,2015, approximately 45% of our revenue was subject to foreign currency translation,translation. Beginning in the majoritylatter part of which relates to2014, the United States dollar strengthened against most major currencies, resulting in a negative impact on our results of operations in Europe.for 2015 and the first half of 2016. We currently expect the strength of the United States dollar and resulting unfavorable impact on our revenue and earnings to continue forthrough the remainder of 20152016. Additionally, there is a transaction impact on our financial results because inventory is often purchased in United States dollars by foreign subsidiaries. As with translation, during times of a strengthening United States dollar, our results of operations will be negatively impacted by these transactions as more fully discussed below.the increased local currency value of inventory results in a higher local currency cost of goods when the goods are sold. We use foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge against a portion of the exposure related to this transaction impact. The hedge contracts cover at least 70% of the projected inventory purchases in United States dollars by our foreign subsidiaries. These contracts are generally entered into 12 months in advance of the related inventory purchases. Therefore, the unfavorable impact of a strengthening United States dollar on the cost of inventory purchases covered by these hedge contracts may be

Throughout
realized in our earnings in the year following discussion, retailinception of the hedge contracts as the underlying inventory hedged by such forward exchange contracts is sold. As such, the unfavorable impact of a strengthening United States dollar against most major currencies in the latter part of 2014 and through 2015, particularly the euro, negatively impacted our gross margin during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016, and is expected to have a negative impact on our earnings during the remainder of 2016. 

Retail comparable store sales discussed below refer to sales for retail stores that have been open for at least 12 months. Sales for retail stores that are closed during the year are excluded from the calculation of retail comparable store sales. Sales for retail stores that are either relocated, materially altered in size or closed for a certain number of consecutive days for renovation are also excluded from the calculation of retail comparable store sales until such stores have been in their new location or in their newly renovated state for at least 12 months. Sales from our e-commerce websitessites are included within retail comparable store sales for those businesses and regions that have operated the related e-commerce websitesite for at least 12 months. Retail comparable store sales are based on comparable weeks and local currencies.

SEASONALITY

Our business generally follows a seasonal pattern. Our wholesale businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the first and third quarters, while our retail businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the fourth quarter. Royalty, advertising and other revenue tends to be earned somewhat evenly throughout the year, although the third quarter has the highest level of royalty revenue due to higher sales by licensees in advance of the holiday selling season. We expect this seasonal pattern will generally continue.

Due to the above factors, our operating results for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of those for a full fiscal year.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Thirteen Weeks Ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 Compared With Thirteen Weeks Ended August 3, 20142, 2015

Total Revenue

Total revenue in the second quarter of 20152016 was $1.864$1.933 billion as compared to $1.976$1.864 billion in the second quarter of the prior year. The decreaseincrease in revenue of $112$69 million was due principally to the net effect of the following items:

The addition of an aggregate of $78 million of revenue attributable to our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments, which included a reduction of $60approximately $16 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation. Revenue in the Calvin Klein North America segment increased 11% (including a 1% negative foreign currency impact) primarily driven by continued healthy performance across the wholesale businesses. Revenue in the North America retail business grew modestly, as square footage expansion in Company-operated stores was partially offset by a 4% comparable store sales decline driven by continued weakness in traffic and consumer spending trends in Calvin Klein’s United States stores located in international tourist locations. Calvin Klein International segment revenue increased 13% (including a 4% negative foreign currency impact), including an 11% increase in comparable store sales. The robust performance was driven by growth across Europe and Asia.

The addition of an aggregate of $50 million of revenue attributable to our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which included a reduction of approximately $99 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation resulting principally from the weaker euro. Revenue in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment increased 1% (including a 2% negative foreign currency impact). Excluding the negative foreign currency impact, revenue increased due to square footage expansion in our retail stores and modest growth in the wholesale business. North America retail comparable store sales were relatively flat due to a continued decline in traffic and spending trends in our United States stores located in international tourist locations as a result of the strengthening United States dollar. Revenue in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment decreased 13% (including a 19% negative foreign currency impact). The increase excluding the negative foreign currency impact was driven primarily by strength in our European business, including a 9% increase in retail comparable store sales.

The reduction of $26 million of revenue attributable to our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments, which included a reduction of approximately $49$9 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation. Revenue in the Calvin KleinTommy Hilfiger North America segment decreased 2% (including a 2% negative foreign currency impact).increased 3% as growth in the wholesale business was partially offset by continued softness in the United States retail business. North America retail comparable store sales increased 4%, despitedeclined 7% compared to the prior year period, driven by continued decreasedweakness in traffic and consumer spending trends in ourTommy Hilfiger’s United States stores located in international tourist locations as a result of the strengthening United States dollar. The North America wholesale business experienced a moderate revenue decline due principally to a shift of shipments into the first quarter from the second quarter in 2015, as well as from the second quarter of the prior year having the benefit of sales from the packaging re-launch of men’s basic styles of Calvin Klein Underwear. Revenue in the Calvin Kleinlocations. Tommy Hilfiger International segment decreased 6%revenue increased 10% (including a 13%1% negative foreign currency impact), with a 3% increase in retail comparable store sales. The international revenue increase excluding the negative foreign currency impact was driven by continued strengthstrong growth in Europe, as customers are responding well toincluding an 8% increase in comparable store sales, and the investments we

33



have made around the brand and in upgraded product, combined with growth in China. Overall, the Calvin Klein Underwear business performed well globally.TH China acquisition.

The reduction of $26an aggregate of $58 million of revenue attributable to our Heritage Brands Retail and Heritage Brands Wholesale segments. The reductiondecrease was driven by the rationalization initiatives in part bythe business discussed in “Operations Overview” above. Also negatively impacting the second quarter of 2016 was overall softness in the prior year having the benefit of the sales attributable to the launch of IZOD at Kohl’sneckwear category and a shift in the timing of wholesale shipments into the firstthird quarter from the second quarter inas compared to the current year, partially offset byprior year. Partially offsetting these decreases was an 8%11% increase in retail comparable store sales in the Van Heusen business.



Gross Profit

Gross profit is calculated as total revenue less cost of goods sold and gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by total revenue. Included as cost of goods sold are costs associated with the production and procurement of product, such as inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving costs and inspection costs. Also included as cost of goods sold are the amounts recognized on foreign currency forward exchange contracts as the underlying inventory hedged by such forward exchange contracts is sold. Warehousing and distribution expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. All of our royalty, advertising and other revenue is included in gross profit because there is no cost of goods sold associated with such revenue. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to that of other entities.

Gross profit in the second quarter of 20152016 was $1.034 billion, or 53.5% of total revenue, as compared to $1.002 billion, or 53.8% of total revenue, compared with $1.055 billion, or 53.4% of total revenue in the second quarter of the prior year. The 4030 basis point increasedecrease was principally driven by overall gross margin improvement(i) the unfavorable impact of the stronger United States dollar on our international businesses that purchase inventory in the Calvin Klein business globally, including in Europe, and faster growth in the higher-margin Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retailUnited States dollars, particularly our European businesses, as compared to the wholesale businesses. These increasesincreased local currency value of inventory resulted in higher cost of goods in local currency when the goods were partially offset bysold, (ii) a decline in gross margin in the Tommy Hilfiger North America businesssegment due to weakcontinued weakness in international tourist traffic and spending, which drove more promotional selling, as well asand (iii) a decrease related to short-lived noncash inventory valuation adjustments recorded in connection with the strengtheningTH China acquisition. These decreases were partially offset by (i) a favorable mix of the United States dollar which causedbusiness due to revenue growth in our higher-margin Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments,businesses and revenue contraction in our lower-margin Heritage Brands business and (ii) the addition of TH China, which generally carrycarries a significantly higher gross marginsmargin than the average gross margin for our North American businesses, to be translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates.overall business.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses in the second quarter of 20152016 were $850$875 million, or 45.6%45.2% of total revenue, as compared to $896$850 million, or 45.3%45.6% of total revenue in the second quarter of the prior year. The 3040 basis point increasedecrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was principally dueattributable to an increase in expenses in the Calvin Klein business related to our continued investments in product and brand initiatives and faster growth in the higher-expense Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retail businesses as compared to the wholesale businesses. These increases were mostly offset by(i) a reduction of costs incurred in connection with the Warnaco integration and restructuring costs, as well asand the impactdiscontinuation of several licensed product lines in the Heritage Brands dress furnishings business and (ii) an overall leveraging of expenses due to the strong second quarter revenue growth in our larger Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which generally carry higher SG&A percentagesbusinesses. These decreases were partially offset by increased costs incurred in connection with the TH China acquisition, primarily consisting of total revenue thannoncash amortization of short-lived assets.

Debt Modification and Extinguishment Costs

We incurred costs totaling $16 million during the second quarter of 2016 in connection with the amendment of our North American businesses, being translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates.senior secured credit facilities. Please see the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Equity in Net (Loss) Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

The equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates in the second quarter of 20152016 was $3 milliona loss of $300,000 as compared to $400,000income of $3 million in the second quarter of the prior year. These amounts relate to our share of income from our joint ventures for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in China, India and Brazil, for the Calvin Klein brand in India, for the Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Kleinand and Van Heusen brands in Australia and for the Karl Lagerfeld brand. Also included in the second quarter of the prior year was our share of income from our joint venture for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in China, as the 55% that we did not own was acquired in the first quarter of 2016. In addition, the equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates in the second quarter of the prior year included a one-time gain of $2 million on our equity investment in the parent company of the Karl Lagerfeld brand (“Karl Lagerfeld”). Our investments in the continuing joint ventures are being accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Please see the section entitled “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense of $28 million in the second quarter of 2016 was flat compared to the second quarter of the prior year, as the positive impacts from debt repayments made during 2015 and the first half of 2016 and the amendment of our senior secured credit facilities in the second quarter of 2016 were offset by the negative impacts of the interest rate swap that commenced in February 2016 to convert a portion of our variable rate debt under our term loans to fixed rate debt and the issuance of €350 million of 3 5/8% senior notes in June 2016. Please see the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.



Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2016 was 21.2% as compared to 19.0% in the second quarter of the prior year.

The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2016 and 2015 were lower than the United States statutory rate due to the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest

We have consolidated the results of PVH Ethiopia, in which we own a 75% interest, in our consolidated financial statements. The net loss attributable to the redeemable non-controlling interest was immaterial for the second quarter of 2016. Please refer to Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a further discussion.
The increase compared to the second quarter of the prior year was principally driven by a one-time gain of $2 million in our equity investment in Kingdom Holding 1 B.V., the parent company of the Karl Lagerfeld brand (“Karl Lagerfeld”).

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense decreased to $28 million in the second quarter of 2015 from $34 million in the second quarter of the prior year due principally to lower average debt balances. Please see the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2015 was an expense of 19.0% compared with a benefit of (0.8)% in the second quarter of the prior year.


34



The effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2015 was lower than the United States statutory rate due primarily to the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2014 was lower than the United States statutory rate due primarily to the favorable resolution in the second quarter of uncertain tax positions, as well as the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 Compared With Twenty-Six Weeks Ended August 3, 20142, 2015

Total Revenue

Total revenue in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 July 31, 2016 was $3.743$3.851 billion as compared to $3.939$3.743 billion in the twenty-six week period of the prior year. The decreaseincrease in revenue of $196$108 million was due principally to the net effect of the following items:

The addition of an aggregate of $147 million of revenue attributable to our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments, which included a reduction of $155approximately $35 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation. Revenue in the Calvin Klein North America segment increased 12% (including a 1% negative foreign currency impact) primarily driven by strong performance in the wholesale business. Revenue in the North America retail business grew modestly, as square footage expansion in Company-operated stores was partially offset by a 4% comparable store sales decline driven by continued weakness in traffic and consumer spending trends in Calvin Klein’s United States stores located in international tourist locations. Calvin Klein International segment revenue increased 11% (including a 4% negative foreign currency impact) due principally to significant growth in Europe. Calvin Klein International segment comparable store sales increased 6%.

The net addition of $74 million of revenue attributable to our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which included a reduction of approximately $200 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation resulting principally from a weaker euro. Revenue in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment decreased 1% (including a 2% negative foreign currency impact) including a 2% decrease in retail comparable store sales attributable to the decline in traffic and spending trends in our United States stores located in international tourist locations as a result of the strengthening United States dollar. Revenue in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment decreased 15% (including a 19% negative foreign currency impact). Excluding the negative foreign currency impact, the increase was driven principally by European retail comparable store sales growth of 6% and low-single digit percentage wholesale growth.

The reduction of $37 million of revenue attributable to our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments, which included a reduction of approximately $94$14 million related to the impact of foreign currency translation. Revenue in the Calvin KleinTommy Hilfiger North America segment decreased 1% (including a 2% negative foreign currency impact). North America retail, as growth in the wholesale business was more than offset by an 8% decline in comparable store sales, increased 2% despite decreaseddriven by continued weakness in traffic and consumer spending trends in ourTommy Hilfiger’s United States stores located in international tourist locations as a result of the strengthening United States dollar. Revenue in the Calvin Kleinlocations. Tommy Hilfiger International segment decreased 5%revenue increased 10% (including a 13%1% negative foreign currency impact). The international revenue increase excluding the negative foreign currency impact was primarily, driven principally by strong performancegrowth across Europe, including a 9% increase in Europe, as well as in Asia, which included a benefit due to the Chinese New Year, as the first quarter of fiscal 2015 included a Chinese New Year while the first quarter of fiscal 2014 did not. International retail comparable store sales, increased 6%.and the TH China acquisition, which was completed in April 2016.

The reduction of $4an aggregate of $113 million of revenue attributable to our Heritage Brands WholesaleRetail and Heritage Brands RetailWholesale segments. The relatively flat revenue compared to the prior year perioddecrease was primarily due to the rationalization initiatives in the business discussed above, partially offset by an 11% increase in retail comparable store sales in the Van Heusen business, offset by the second quarter of the prior year having the benefit of the sales attributable to the launch of IZOD at Kohl’s.
business.

Revenue for the full year 20152016 is currently projected to decreaseincrease approximately 2% compared to the prior year, inclusive of a negative impact of 6%approximately 1% related to foreign currency translation. Revenue for the Calvin Klein business is currently expected to increase approximately 1%5% compared to the prior year,2015, inclusive of a negative impact of 7%approximately 2% related to foreign currency translation. Revenue for the Tommy Hilfiger business is currently expected to decreaseincrease approximately 5% compared to the prior year, inclusive of a negative impact of 9% related to foreign currency translation.2015. Revenue for the Heritage Brands business is currently projected to decrease approximately 3%8% compared to 2015, principally due to the prior year.rationalization initiatives discussed in “Operations Overview” that will continue to impact the business throughout 2016.



Gross Profit on Total Revenue

Gross profit on total revenue in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was $2.041 billion, or 53.0% of total revenue, as compared to $1.988 billion, or 53.1% of total revenue, compared with $2.088 billion, or 53.0% of total revenue in the twenty-six week period of the prior year. GrossNegatively impacting gross margin improvement in the overall Calvin Klein business, includingtwenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was (i) the unfavorable impact of the stronger United States dollar on our international businesses that purchase inventory in Europe, and faster growth in the higher-margin Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retailUnited States dollars, particularly our European businesses, as compared to the wholesale businessesincreased local currency value of inventory resulted in higher cost of goods in local currency when the goods were partially offset bysold, and (ii) a lowerdecline in gross margin in the Tommy Hilfiger North America businesssegment due to weakcontinued weakness in international tourist traffic in the United States,and spending, which drove more promotional selling. Additionally, the strengtheningThese decreases were mostly offset by (i) a favorable mix of the United States dollar causedbusiness due to revenue growth in our higher-margin Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments,businesses and revenue contraction in our lower-margin Heritage Brands business and (ii) the addition of TH China, which generally carrycarries a significantly higher gross marginsmargin than the average gross margin for our North American businesses, to be translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates.

35

overall business.


We currently expect that gross margin for the full year 2015in 2016 will be relatively flat compared with 2014, as the overall strong improvement in our Calvin Klein business and faster growth in the higher-margin Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retail businessesincrease as compared to 2015 due to (i) a favorable mix of business due to the wholesaleexpected revenue growth in our higher-margin Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses are expected to be offset by a declineand revenue contraction in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segmentlower-margin Heritage Brands business and (ii) the negative impactaddition of foreign currencies.TH China, which we estimate will carry a significantly higher gross margin than the average gross margin for our overall business. We currently expect that these gross margin increases will be partially offset by the strengthunfavorable impact of the stronger United States dollar experienced in the first half of 2015 to continue and, as a result, our Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which generally carry higher gross margins than our North American businesses, will be translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates. Additionally,on our international businesses most oftenthat purchase inventory in United States dollars, and, as the United States dollar strengthens, this United States dollar-based inventory converts into a higher amount ofincreased local currency value of inventory andresults in higher cost of goods in local currency when the goods are sold. We currently expect this will be the case for the remainder of 2015.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 were $1.665$1.740 billion, or 44.5%45.2% of total revenue, as compared to $1.755$1.665 billion, or 44.5% of total revenue, in the twenty-six week period of the prior year. The 70 basis points increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was flatprincipally attributable to an increase of costs incurred in connection with the TH China acquisition, a portion of which was noncash charges related to amortization of short-lived assets, partially offset by a reduction of costs incurred in connection with the Warnaco integration and restructuring compared to the prior year period, as an increase in expenses in the Calvin Klein business related to our continued investments in product and brand initiatives and faster growth in the higher-expense Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retail businesses as compared to the wholesale businesses were offset by a reduction in Warnaco integration and restructuring costs, as well as the impact of our Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which generally carry higher SG&A percentages of total revenue than our North American businesses, being translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates.period.

We currently expect that our SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue forin 2016 will increase from 2015 due to (i) the fullimpact of an unfavorable mix of business due to the expected revenue growth in our higher-expense Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses and revenue contraction in our lower-expense Heritage Brands business, (ii) costs of approximately $72 million expected to be incurred in connection with the acquisition of TH China, which primarily consist of noncash charges related to amortization of short-lived assets, and (iii) additional costs expected to be incurred in the second half of the year 2015 will decrease from 2014,related to marketing and advertising, as
(i) we currently do not expect well as investments associated with the recent Calvin Klein creative team leadership change. Additionally, our 2015expectation of 2016 SG&A expenses to be significantly impacted bydoes not include the impact of an actuarial gain or loss associated with our United States retirement plans, while our 20142015 SG&A expenses included a $139$20 million actuarial loss, and (ii) we currently expectgain. These increases are expected to incurbe partially offset by (i) lower costs expected to be incurred in 20152016 as compared to 20142015 in respect toconnection with the integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. These decreases arerestructuring and the discontinuation of several licensed product lines in the Heritage Brands dress furnishings business and (ii) a gain of approximately $15 million expected to be partially offset by an increase in expensesrecorded in the Calvin Klein businessthird quarter of 2016 related to a payment expected to be made to us to exit one of our continued investments in product and brand initiatives and faster growth in the higher-expense Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein retail businesses as compared to the wholesale businesses. In addition, we expect that the impact of the stronger United States dollarflagship locations in 2015 as compared with 2014 will result in a decrease in our SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue, as our Calvin Klein International and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, which generally carry higher SG&A percentages of total revenue than our North American businesses, will be translated to United States dollars at lower average exchange rates.Europe. Our actual SG&A expenses may be significantly different than our projections because of expenseexpenses associated with our United States retirement plans. United States retirementRetirement plan expenseexpenses recorded throughout the year isare calculated using actuarial valuations that incorporate assumptions and estimates about financial market, economic and demographic conditions. Differences between estimated and actual results give rise to gains and losses that are recorded immediately in earnings, generally in the fourth quarter of the year, which can create volatility in our operating results.

Debt Modification and Extinguishment Costs

We incurred costs totaling $16 million during the second quarter of 2016 in connection with the amendment of our senior secured credit facilities. Please see the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Gain to Write-Up Equity Investment in Joint Venture to Fair Value

We recorded a pre-tax noncash gain of $153 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 to write-up our equity investment in TH China to fair value in connection with the acquisition of the 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that we did not already own. Such fair value was estimated based on the fair value of TH China and included an estimated discount for a lack of marketability. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a further discussion.



Equity in Net (Loss) Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

The equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was $9 million,a loss of $500,000, as compared to $4income of $9 million during the twenty-six week period of the prior year. These amounts relate to our share of income from our joint ventures for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in China (the 55% that we did not own was acquired on April 13, 2016), India and Brazil, for the Calvin Klein brand in India, for the Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein and Van Heusen brands in Australia and for the Karl Lagerfeld brand. Please referThe loss incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 is primarily related to Note 4, “Investmentsone-time expenses of $6 million recorded on our equity investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” inTH China prior to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a further discussion. The equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates inacquisition closing. In addition, the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 includesincluded a one-time gain of $2 million inon our equity investment in Karl Lagerfeld.

Debt Modification and Extinguishment Costs

We incurred costs totaling $93 million during the first quarter of 2014 in connection with the amendment and restatement of our senior secured credit facilities entered into in 2013 and the related redemption of our 7 3/8% senior notes due 2020. Please refer tosee the section entitled “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense decreased to $58$57 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 from $74$58 million in the twenty-six week period of the prior year due to lower averageas the positive impacts from debt balancesrepayments made during 2015 and interest rates as compared to the prior year, combined

36



withfirst half of 2016 and the effectamendment of our senior secured credit facilities in the second quarter of 2016 were mostly offset by the negative impacts of the amendment and restatementinterest rate swap that commenced in February 2016 to convert a portion of our credit facilityvariable rate debt under our term loans to fixed rate debt and the related redemptionissuance of our 7 3/€350 million of 3 5/8% senior notes due 2020 duringin June 2016. Please see the first quarter of 2014.section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Net interest expense for the full year 20152016 is currently expected to decreaseincrease to approximatelya range of $117 million to $120 million from $139compared to $113 million in 2014, mainly2015, primarily due to lower averagethe negative impacts of the interest rate swap that commenced in February 2016 to convert a portion of our variable rate debt balances. We currently expectunder our term loans to repay approximately $350fixed rate debt and the issuance of €350 million of long-term
3 5/8% senior notes in June 2016, partially offset by the positive impacts from debt repayments made during 2015 and expected to be made in 2015,2016 and the amendment of which $166 million was repaid duringour senior secured credit facilities in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.second quarter of 2016. Please see the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 were 15.3% and August 3, 2014 were 20.8% and 4.5%, respectively.

The effective income tax rate for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was lower than the United States statutory rate due primarily to the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns. Also contributing to the lower effective income tax rate for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was the benefit of certain discrete items, including the lower tax rate applicable to the pre-tax gain recorded to write-up our existing equity investment in TH China to fair value.

The effective income tax rate for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was lower than the United States statutory rate due primarily to the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

The effective income tax rate for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 was lower than the United States statutory rate due primarily to the favorable resolution in the second quarter of 2014 of uncertain tax positions, as well as the benefit of lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

We currently expect our full year 20152016 effective income tax rate to be lower than the United States statutory rate due principally to the benefit of overall lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

Our tax rate is affected by many factors, including the mix of international and domestic pre-tax earnings, discrete events arising from specific transactions, and audits by tax authorities or the receipt of new information, any of which can cause us to change our estimate for uncertain tax positions.

Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest

We have consolidated the results of PVH Ethiopia, in which we own a 75% interest, in our consolidated financial statements. The net loss attributable to the redeemable non-controlling interest was immaterial for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016. Please refer to Note 5, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a further discussion.




LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow Summary

Cash and cash equivalents at August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was $467$742 million, a reductionan increase of $13$185 million from the amount at January 31, 2016 of $556 million. The increase was driven in large part by the $390 million of net proceeds from the issuance of €350 million euro-denominated principal amount of 3 5/8% senior notes on June 20, 2016, partially offset by (i) a $158 million payment (net of cash at February 1, 2015acquired of $479 million.$105 million) in connection with the TH China acquisition and (ii) $127 million of common stock repurchases under the stock repurchase program in 2016. The seasonality of our business may result in significant fluctuations in our cash balance between fiscal year-end and subsequent interim periods due to the timing of inventory purchases and peak sales periods. Cash flow for the full year 20152016 will be impacted by various factors in addition to those noted below in this “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section, including the amount of debt repayments and stock repurchases we make in 2015.2016.

As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, approximately $409$457 million of cash and cash equivalents was held by international subsidiaries whose undistributed earnings are considered permanently reinvested. Our intent is to continue to reinvest these funds in international operations. If management decides at a later date to repatriate these funds to the United States, we would be required to pay taxes on these amounts based on applicable United States tax rates, net of foreign taxes already paid.

Operations

Cash provided by operating activities was $409 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 compared to $323 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 compared to $170 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014.2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily driven by changes in working capital and an increase in net income as adjusted for noncash charges in the current year period.capital.
 
Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures in the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 were $101$103 million compared to $103$101 million in the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014.2, 2015. We currently expect that capital expenditures for the full year 20152016 will be approximately $300$275 million. Capital expenditures in 2015 will2016 primarily include investments in new stores and store expansions, as well as continued investments in operations and infrastructure.infrastructure, including system improvements.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

During the first quarter of 2014, we acquired a 10% economic interest in Karl Lagerfeld for $19 million.

In 2013, we formed a joint venture, PVH Brands Australia Pty. Limited (“PVH Australia”), in which we own a 50% economic interest. The joint venture licenseshas licensed from one of our subsidiaries since the first quarter of 2014 the rights to distribute and sell certain Calvin Klein brand products in Australia, New Zealand and other island nations in the South Pacific. As part of the transaction, we contributed to

37



the joint venture on the first day of 2014 PVH Australia our subsidiaries that were operating the Calvin Klein Jeans businesses in Australia and New Zealand. In addition, duringDuring the first quarter of 2015, we completed a transaction wherebyin which the Tommy Hilfiger and Van Heusen trademarks in Australia were licensed for certain product categories to subsidiaries of PVH Australia for use in Australia, New Zealand and, in the case of Tommy Hilfiger, other island nations in the South Pacific. The Tommy Hilfiger trademarks had previously been licensed to a third party and the Van Heusen trademarks had previously been licensed to the Company’sour joint venture partner in PVH Australia. Additionally, subsidiaries of PVH Australia license other trademarks for certain product categories. We made a net paymentspayment of $21 million of(of which $20 million was placed into an escrow account prior to the end of 2014, and $7 million2014), to PVH Australia during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014, respectively, representing our 50% share of the joint venture funding.funding for the period.

WeIn 2013, we acquired a 51% economic interest in a Calvin Klein joint venture in India Premium Garments Wholesale Tradingthat has since been renamed Calvin Klein Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“CK India”), as part of the Warnaco acquisition. The joint venture. CK India licenses from one of our subsidiaries the rights to the Calvin Klein trademarks in India for certain product categories. During the first quarter of 2014, Arvind Limited (“Arvind”) purchased our prior joint venture partners’ shares in CK India and, as a result of the entry into a shareholder agreement with different governing arrangements between us and Arvind, we are no longer deemed to hold a controlling interest in the joint venture. CK India was deconsolidated as a result and we began reporting our 51% interest as an equity method investment in the first quarter of 2014. We made a payment of $2 million to CK India during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 to contribute our 51% share of the joint venture funding.funding for the period.



In 2012, we formed a joint venture, Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A. (“TH Brazil”), in Brazil, in which we own a 40% economic interest. TH Brazil licenses from one of our subsidiaries the rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in Brazil for certain product categories. We made a payment of $2 million to TH Brazil during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 to contribute our 40% share of the joint venture funding for the period.

Acquisition of Russia FranchiseeTH China

We acquired on April 13, 2016 the 55% of the ownership interests in TH China that we did not already own. Prior to April 13, 2016, our 45% interest in TH China owned by the Company was accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We paid $158 million, net of cash acquired of $105 million, as cash consideration for this transaction. Please see Note 3, “Acquisitions,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a further discussion.

Tommy Hilfiger India Contingent Purchase Price Payments

DuringWe reacquired in 2011 the first quarter of 2014, we acquired for $4 million tworights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger stores in Russia fromtrademarks that had been subject to a formerperpetual license previously granted to GVM International Limited. We are required to make annual contingent purchase price payments based on a percentage of sales of Tommy Hilfigerfranchisee.

Acquisition of Ireland Franchisee

During the first quarter of 2014, we acquired for $3 million six Tommy Hilfiger stores in Ireland from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee.products in India in excess of an agreed upon threshold during each of five consecutive 12-month periods (extended to a sixth consecutive 12-month period if the aggregate payments for the five 12-month periods are not at least $15 million, which will be the case). Such payments are subject to a $25 million aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. The estimated fair value of future contingent purchase price payments was $2 million as of July 31, 2016.

Calvin Klein Contingent Purchase Price Payments

In connection with our acquisition of Calvin Klein in 2003, we are obligated to pay Mr. Calvin Klein contingent purchase price payments based on 1.15% of total worldwide net sales (as defined in the acquisition agreement, as amended) of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. A significant portion of the sales on which the payments to Mr. Klein are made are wholesale sales by us and our licensees and other partners to retailers. Such contingent purchase price payments totaled $25 million and $24 million in each of the twenty-six week periodsweeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014.respectively. Based upon current exchange rates, we currently expect that such payments will be approximately $51$54 million for the full year 2015.2016.

Dividends

Our common stock currently pays annual dividends totaling $0.15 per share. Dividends on common stock totaled $9 million in each of the twenty-six week periodsweeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014. 2015.

We currently project that cash dividends on our common stock in 20152016 will be approximately $13 million.$12 million based on our current dividend rate, the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2016, our estimates of stock to be issued during 2016 under our stock incentive plans and our estimates of stock repurchases during 2016.

Acquisition of Treasury Shares

Our Board of Directors authorized a $500 million three-year stock repurchase program effective June 3, 2015. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time over the period through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions or other methods, as we deem appropriate. Purchases are made based on a variety of factors, such as price, corporate requirements and overall market conditions, applicable legal requirements and limitations, restrictions under our debt arrangements, trading restrictions under our insider trading policy and other relevant factors. The stock repurchase program may be modified, including to increase or decrease the repurchase limitation or extend, suspend, or terminate the program, by us at any time, without prior notice.

During the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016, we purchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock in open market transactions for $129 million (2.8 million shares for $255 million since inception) under the program, of which $2 million was accrued for in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2016. The repurchased shares were held as treasury stock and $245 million of the authorization remained available for future share repurchases as of July 31, 2016.

Treasury stock activity also includes shares that were withheld principally in conjunction with the settlement of vested restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units to satisfy tax withholding requirements.



Assets Held for Sale

In 2015, one of our European subsidiaries entered into an agreement to sell an owned building in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We classified the building as held for sale beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015 and ceased recording depreciation on the building at that time. The building had a carrying value of $15 million as of January 31, 2016.
We completed the sale of the building on July 4, 2016 for proceeds of €15 million (approximately $17 million based on the exchange rate in effect on that date).
Financing Arrangements

Our capital structure was as follows:
(in millions)August 2, 2015 February 1, 2015 August 3, 2014July 31, 2016 January 31, 2016 August 2, 2015
Short-term borrowings $8
 $8
 $165
$19
 $26
 $8
Current portion of long-term debt 112
 99
 99
—
 137
 112
Capital lease obligations17
 18
 22
16
 15
 17
Long-term debt 3,262
 3,439
 3,643
3,358
 3,032
 3,237
Stockholders’ equity 4,410
 4,364
 4,530
4,804
 4,552
 4,410

In addition, we had $467$742 million, $479$556 million and $461$467 million of cash and cash equivalents as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, February 1, 2015January 31, 2016 and August 3, 2014,2, 2015, respectively.


38



Short-Term Borrowings

One of our Asian subsidiaries has yen-denominated short-term lines of credit and overdraft facilities with a number of Japanese banks at various interest rates that provide for borrowings of up to ¥2.200 billion (approximately $21 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and are utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. As of July 31, 2016, we had $19 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at July 31, 2016 was 0.28%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was $19 million.

One of our Asian subsidiaries has a yen-denominatedwon-denominated overdraft facility with a JapaneseSouth Korean bank that provides for borrowings of up to ¥1.000₩3.500 billion (approximately $8$3 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015)July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and bear interest at the one-month Japanese interbank borrowingSouth Korean bank three-month certificate of deposit rate plus 0.30%. Such facility renews automatically unless we give notice of termination. As of August 2, 2015, we had approximately $8 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at August 2, 2015 was 0.43%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was equal to the maximum amount of borrowings available under this facility.

One of our European subsidiaries has short-term revolving notes with a number of banks at various interest rates, as well as euro-denominated overdraft facilities that provide for borrowings of up to €60 million (approximately $66 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015). These facilities are used primarily to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.

One of our European subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Turkish bank that provides for borrowings of up to $3 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Turkish Central Bank lending rate plus 0.50%1.50%. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of August 2, 2015. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was approximately $3 million.

One of our European subsidiaries has Turkish lira-denominated short-term line of credit facilities with a number of Turkish banks that provide for borrowings of up to lira 6 million (approximately $2 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015) and are utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at the Turkish Central Bank lending rate plus 1.25%. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.

One of our Mexican subsidiaries has a peso-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Mexican bank that provides for borrowings of up to ₱67 million (approximately $4 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate plus 1.50%. As of August 2, 2015, we had approximately $100,000 of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding at August 2, 2015 was 4.81%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 was approximately $2 million.July 31, 2016.

One of our Asian subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with one lendera bank that provides for borrowings of up to $10 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 1.75% plus the one-month London interbank borrowing rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.50%. At the end of each month, amounts outstanding under this facility may be carried forward for additional one-month periods for up to one year. This facility is subject to certain terms and conditions and may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the lender.bank. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015. July 31, 2016.

One of our AsianEuropean subsidiaries has a Korean won-denominatedeuro-denominated short-term revolving credit facilitynotes with one lendera number of banks at various interest rates, as well as overdraft facilities, that providesprovide for borrowings of up to ₩3.000 billion€60 million (approximately $3$67 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and are used primarily to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016).

One of our European subsidiaries has a United States dollar-denominated short-term line of credit facility with a Turkish bank that provides for borrowings of up to $4 million and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the three-month Cost of Funds IndexTurkish overnight lending rate plus a specified margin. There were3.00%. As of July 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility asfacility. The maximum amount of orborrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015. July 31, 2016 was $3 million.

One of our Latin AmericanEuropean subsidiaries has Brazilian real-denominateda Turkish lira-denominated short-term revolvingline of credit facilitiesfacility with a number of banksTurkish bank that provideprovides for total available borrowings of R$83up to lira 3 million (approximately $25$1 million based on exchange rates in effect on August 2, 2015) July 31, 2016)


and areis utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilitiesthis facility bear interest at variousthe Turkish overnight lending rate plus 4.00%. As of July 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was $1 million.

One of our Mexican subsidiaries has a peso-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with a Mexican bank that provides for borrowings of up to ₱161 million (approximately $9 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest rates.at the Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate plus 0.90%. As of July 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 was equal to the maximum amount of borrowings available under this facility.

One of our Latin American subsidiaries has a Brazilian real-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with a Brazilian bank that provides for borrowings of up to R$25 million (approximately $8 million based on exchange rates in effect on July 31, 2016) and is utilized primarily to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the twenty-six weeks endedAugust 2, 2015. July 31, 2016.

We also have the ability to draw revolving borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities as discussed in the section entitled “2014“2016 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below. There wereAs of July 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of August 2, 2015.facilities. The maximum amount of revolving borrowings outstanding under these facilities during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 was approximately $16$15 million. In addition, we have certain other facilities under which we had no borrowings outstanding as of or during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.


39



Capital Lease Obligations

Our cash payments for capital lease obligations totaled $4 million induring each of the twenty-six week periodsweeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014.

2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On February 13, 2013, simultaneously with and related to the closing of the Warnaco acquisition, we entered into senior secured credit facilities (the “2013 facilities”), the proceeds of which were used to fund a portion of the acquisition, repay all outstanding borrowings under our prior facilities and repay all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt. The 2013 facilities consisted of a $1.700 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7 million as of the acquisition date), a $1.375 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7 million as of the acquisition date) and senior secured revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $750 million (based on the applicable exchange rates on February 13, 2013), consisting of (a) a $475 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €186 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs.
On March 21, 2014, we amended and restated the 2013 facilities, as discussed immediately below.2015.

2014 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On March 21, 2014, (the “Restatement Date”), we entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2013our senior secured credit facilities (as amended, by the Amendment, the “2014 facilities”). The Amendment provided for an additional $350 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility and an additional $250 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan B facility and extended the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2018 to February 13, 2019. The maturity of the Term Loan B facility remains at February 13, 2020. On the Restatement Date, we borrowed the additional principal amounts described above and used the proceeds to redeem all of our outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes, as discussed in the section entitled “7 3/8% Senior Notes Due 2020” below. In connection with entering into the Amendment, we paid debt issuance costs of $13 million (of which $8 million was expensed as debt modification and extinguishment costs and $5 million is being amortized over the term of the related debt agreement) and recorded additional debt modification and extinguishment costs of $3 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs.

The 2014 facilities consistconsisted of a $1.986 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility, (recorded net of an original issue discount of $8 million), a $1.189 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility (recorded net of an original issue discount of $6 million) and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €186 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs.
On May 19, 2016, we amended the 2014 facilities, as discussed in the following section.

2016 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On May 19, 2016 (the “Amendment Date”), we entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2014 facilities (as amended by the Amendment, the “2016 facilities”). Among other things, the Amendment provided for an additional $582 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility, the repayment of all outstanding loans under the Term Loan B facility and the termination of the Term Loan B facility. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2019 to May 19, 2021. On the Amendment Date, we borrowed the additional $582 million principal amount of loans under the Term Loan A facility made available pursuant to the Amendment and used the proceeds of such borrowings to repay the $582 million principal amount of loans outstanding under the Term Loan B facility under the 2014 facilities.

The 2016 facilities consist of a $2.347 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €186 million euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or Swiss francs. In connection with entering into the Amendment, we paid debt issuance costs of $11 million (of which $5 million was expensed as debt modification costs and $6 million is being amortized over the term of the related debt agreement) and recorded debt extinguishment costs of $11 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs.

The revolving credit facilities also include amounts available for letters of credit. As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, we had no outstanding revolving credit borrowings and $38$24 million of outstanding letters of credit. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facilities. A portion of each of the United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facilities is also available for the making of swingline loans. The


issuance of such letters of credit and the making of any swingline loan reduces the amount available under the applicable revolving credit facility. So long as certain conditions are satisfied, we may add one or more term loan facilities or increase the commitments under the revolving credit facilities by an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (1) the sum of (x) $1.350 billion plus (y) the aggregate amount of all voluntary prepayments of term loans under the facilitiesTerm Loan A and the revolving credit facilities (to the extent, in the case of voluntary prepayments of loans under the revolving credit facilities, there is an equivalent permanent reduction of the revolving commitments) plus (z) an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated) and (2) an additional unlimited amount as long as the ratio of our senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 20142016 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase. The lenders under the 20142016 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

DuringThe terms of the Term Loan A facility require us to make quarterly repayments of amounts outstanding under the 2016 facilities, which commenced with the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2016. Such amounts equal 5.00% per annum of the principal amount outstanding on the Amendment Date for the first eight calendar quarters following the Amendment Date, 7.50% per annum of the principal amount for the four quarters thereafter and 10.00% per annum of the principal amount for the remaining quarters, in each case paid in equal installments and in each case subject to certain customary adjustments, with the balance due on the maturity date of the Term Loan A facility.

We made payments of $201 million and $166 million during the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2016 and August 2, 2015, we made payments of $166 millionrespectively, on our term loans under the 2014 and 2016 facilities. As a result of August 2, 2015,the voluntary repayments we made, as of July 31, 2016, we had totalsatisfied our mandatory long-term debt repayment requirements for the next twelve months. We had term loans outstanding of $2.574$2.187 billion, net of original issue discounts. The termsdiscounts and debt issuance costs, as of each of Term Loan A and Term Loan B contain a mandatory quarterly repayment schedule. Due to previous voluntary payments, we are not required to make any additional mandatory payments under Term Loan B prior to maturity.July 31, 2016.

40




Our obligations under the 20142016 facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries, with certain exceptions. Obligations of the European Borrowerborrower under the 20142016 facilities are guaranteed by us, substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect domesticUnited States subsidiaries (with certain exceptions) and Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of ours organized in the Netherlands.ours. We and our domesticUnited States subsidiary guarantors have pledged certain of our assets as security for the obligations under the 20142016 facilities.

The outstanding borrowings under the 20142016 facilities are prepayable at any time without penalty (other than customary breakage costs). The terms of the 20142016 facilities require us to repay certain amounts outstanding thereunder with (a) net cash proceeds of the incurrence of certain indebtedness, (b) net cash proceeds of certain asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or condemnation) that exceed certain thresholds, to the extent such proceeds are not reinvested or committed to be reinvested in the business in accordance with customary reinvestment provisions, and (c) a percentage of excess cash flow that exceeds the voluntary debt payments we have made during the applicable year, which percentage is based upon our net leverage ratio during the relevant fiscal period.

The United States dollar-denominated borrowings under the 20142016 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at our option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the United States federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (iii) a one-month adjusted Eurocurrency rate plus 1.00% (provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the base rate be deemed to be less than 1.75%) or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities (provided that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the adjusted Eurocurrency rate be deemed to be less than 0.75%).2016 facilities.

The Canadian dollar-denominated borrowings under the 20142016 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at our option, either (a) a Canadian prime rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the rate of interest per annum that Royal Bank of Canada establishes at its main office in Toronto, Ontario as the reference rate of interest in order to determine interest rates for loans in Canadian dollars to its Canadian borrowers and (ii) the sum of (x) the average of the rates per annum for Canadian dollar bankers’ acceptances having a term of one month that appears on the display referred to as “CDOR Page” of Reuters Monitor Money Rate Services as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date of determination, as reported by the administrative agent (and if such screen is not available, any successor or similar service as may be selected by the administrative agent), and (y) 0.75%, or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 20142016 facilities.

The borrowings under the 20142016 facilities in currencies other than United States dollars or Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 20142016 facilities.

The current applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan A facility and each revolving credit facility is 1.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 0.50% for base rate loans, respectively. The current applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan B facility is 2.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans, respectively. After the date of delivery of the compliance certificate and


financial statements with respect to each of our fiscal quarter ending August 2, 2015,quarters, the applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan A facility, the Term Loan B facility and the revolving credit facilities is subject to adjustment based upon our net leverage ratio.

The 20142016 facilities contain customary events of default, including but not limited to nonpayment; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended; certain events related to certain of the guarantees by us and certain of our subsidiaries, and certain pledges of our assets and those of certain of our subsidiaries, as security for the obligations under the 20142016 facilities; and a change in control (as defined in the 20142016 facilities).

During the second quarter of 2014, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement for an 18-month term commencing on August 18, 2014. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of capping the interest rate on an initial notional amount of $514 million of our variable rate debt obligation under the 2014 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms. Such agreement remains outstanding with a notional amount of $612 million as of August 2, 2015. Under the terms of this agreement, the one-month LIBOR that we will pay ispaid was capped at a rate of 1.50%. Therefore, the maximum amount of interest that we will paywould have paid on the then-outstanding notional amount will bewas at the 1.50% capped rate, plus the current applicable margin. The agreement expired on February 17, 2016.

During the second quarter of 2014, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a two-year term commencing on February 17, 2016. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $683 million of our variable rate debt obligation under the 2014 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms, including the 2016 facilities, to fixed rate

41



debt. Such agreement remains outstanding with a notional amount of $665 million as of July 31, 2016, and is now converting a portion of our variable rate debt obligation under the 2016 facilities to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, our exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR is eliminated and we will pay a weighted average fixed rate of 1.924%, plus the current applicable margin.

During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on August 19, 2013. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $1.229 billion of our variable rate debt obligation under theour previously outstanding 2013 facilities or any replacement facility with similar terms, including the 2016 facilities, to fixed rate debt. Such agreement remainsremained outstanding with a notional amount of $882$427 million as of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, and is nowwas converting a portion of our variable rate debt obligation under the 20142016 facilities to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, our exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR iswas eliminated and we will paypaid a fixed rate of 0.604%, plus the current applicable margin.

In addition, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $632 million of our variable rate debt obligation under the previously outstanding 2011 facilities, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. The agreement expired on June 6, 2014.August 17, 2016.

The notional amount of eachany outstanding interest rate swap and cap will be adjusted according to a pre-set schedule during the term of eachthe applicable swap and cap agreement such that, based on our projections for future debt repayments, our outstanding debt under the Term Loan A facility is expected to always equal or exceed the combined notional amount of the then-outstanding interest rate swaps and cap.swaps.

The 20142016 facilities also contain covenants that restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs, to take advantage of other business opportunities that may be in our interest or to satisfy our obligations under our other outstanding debt. These covenants restrict our ability to, among other things:

incur or guarantee additional debt or extend credit;
make restricted payments, including paying dividends or making distributions on, or redeeming or repurchasing, our capital stock or certain debt;
make acquisitions and investments;
dispose of assets;
engage in transactions with affiliates;
enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;
create liens on our assets or engage in sale/leaseback transactions; and
effect a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer, or lease all or substantially all of our assets.

The 20142016 facilities require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum interest coverage and maximum net leverage. A breach of any of these operating or financial covenants would result in a default under the applicable facility. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable which would result in acceleration of our other debt. If we were unable to repay any such borrowings when due, the lenders could proceed against their collateral, which also secures some of our other indebtedness.



4 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2022

On December 20, 2012, we issued $700 million principal amount of 4 1/2% senior notes due December 15, 20222022. We paid $16 million of fees during 2013 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Subject to certain conditions, we may redeem up to 35%issuance of these notes, prior to December 15, 2015 withwhich are amortized over the net cash proceedsterm of certain equity offerings without having to pay a penalty or “make whole” premium.the notes. We may redeem some or all of these notes at any time prior to December 15, 2017 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we may redeem some or all of these notes on or after December 15, 2017 at specified redemption prices plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Our ability to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments is limited, in each case, over specified amounts as defined in the indenture governing the notes.

7 3/4% Debentures Due 2023

We have outstanding $100 million of debentures due November 15, 2023 with a yield to maturity of 7.80%. The debentures accrue interest at the rate of 7 3/4%. Pursuant to the indenture governing the debentures, we must maintain a certain level of stockholders’ equity in order to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments, as defined in the indenture governing the debentures.


42



7 3/3 5/8% Senior Notes Due 20202024

On May 6, 2010,June 20, 2016, we issued $600€350 million euro-denominated principal amount of 7 3/3 5/8% senior notes due MayJuly 15, 2020. On March 24, 2014,2024. Interest on the notes is payable in euros. We paid €6 million (approximately $7 million based on exchange rates in effect on the payment date) of fees during the second quarter of 2016 in connection with the amendment and restatementissuance of these notes, which are amortized over the term of the 2013 facilities discussed above in the section entitled “2014 Senior Secured Credit Facilities,” we redeemednotes. We may redeem some or all of our outstanding 7 3/8% seniorthese notes and, pursuantat any time prior to the indenture under which the notes were issued, paidApril 15, 2024 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we may redeem some or all of $68 million to the holdersthese notes on or after April 15, 2024 at their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

Substantially all of the notes. We also recorded costsour assets have been pledged as collateral to secure our obligations under our senior secured credit facilities, the 7 3/4% debentures due 2023 and contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein as discussed in Note 7, “Goodwill,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of $14 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs associated with these notes.this report.

As of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all applicable financial and non-financial covenants under our financing arrangements.

As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, our corporate credit was rated Ba1 by Moody’s with a stable outlook and our issuer credit was rated BB+ by Standard & Poor’s with a stable outlook. In assessing our credit strength, we believe that both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s considered, among other things, our capital structure and financial policies as well as our consolidated balance sheet, our historical acquisition activity and other financial information, as well as industry and other qualitative factors.

Please refer to Note 8,9, “Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a schedule of mandatory long-term debt repayments over the next five years.

Stock Repurchase Program

Our Board of Directors authorized a $500 million three-year stock repurchase program effective June 3, 2015. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time over the period through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions or other methods, as we deem appropriate. Purchases are made based on a variety of factors, such as price, corporate requirements and overall market conditions, applicable legal requirements and limitations, restrictions under our debt arrangements, trading restrictions under our insider trading policy, and other relevant factors. The program may be modified, including to increase or decrease the repurchase limitation or extend, suspend, or terminate the program, by us at any time, without prior notice.

During the second quarter of 2015, we purchased 130,853 shares of our common stock in open market transactions for $15 million under the program. As of August 2, 2015, the repurchased shares were held as treasury stock and $485 million of the authorization remained available for future share repurchases.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2015.January 31, 2016. During the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies from those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2015.January 31, 2016.

43



ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Financial instruments held by us as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016 include cash and cash equivalents, short and long-term debt, foreign currency forward exchange and foreign currency option contracts and interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements. Note 11,12, “Fair Value Measurements,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report outlines the fair value of our financial instruments as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016. Cash and cash equivalents held by us are affected by short-term interest rates.rates, which are currently low. Due to the currently low rates of return we are receiving on our cash equivalents, the potential for a significant decrease in short-term interest rates is low and, therefore, a further decrease would not have a material impact on our interest income. However, there is potential for a more significant increase in short-term interest rates, which could have a more material impact on our interest income. Given our balance of cash and cash equivalents at August 2, 2015July 31, 2016, the effect of a 10 basis point change in short-term interest rates on our interest income would be approximately $0.5 million$700,000 annually. Borrowings under our senior secured credit2016 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus a variable rate. As such, our credit facilities expose us to market risk for changes in interest rates. We have entered into interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements for the intended purpose of reducing our exposure to interest rate volatility. As of August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, after taking into account the effect of our interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements that were in effect at such date, approximately 70%65% of our long-term debt was at a fixed or cappedinterest rate, with the remainder at variable interest rates. Given our debt position at August 2, 2015,July 31, 2016, the effect of a 10 basis point change in interest rates on our interest expense would be approximately $1.0$1 million annually. Such amount excludes any impact from our United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility, which would currently not be impacted by a 10 basis point change in interest rates due to its adjusted Eurocurrency rate floor of 0.75%. Please refer to Note 8, “Debt,”“Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsManagement’s Discussion and Analysis section included in Part I, Item 12 of this report for a further discussion of our credit facilities and interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements.

Our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses each have substantial international components whichthat expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Our Heritage BrandBrands business also has international components but those components are not significant to the business. Changes in exchange rates between the United States dollar and other currencies can impact our financial results in two ways;ways: a translation impact and a transaction impact. The translation impact refers to the impact that changes in exchange rates can have on our published financial results, as our operating results in local foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars using an average exchange rate over the representative period. Accordingly, the impact of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the euro, the Brazilian real, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican peso, the Indian rupee, the Russian ruble and the Chinese yuan renminbi, will have a negative impact on our reported results of operations. To hedge against a portion of this exposure, we entered into several foreign currency option contracts during the second quarter of 2016. These contracts represent our purchase of euro put/United States dollar call options. The changes in the fair value of these foreign currency option contracts are recognized immediately in earnings. This mitigates the effect of a strengthening United States dollar against the euro on the reporting of our euro-denominated operating results. Absent material changes in the fair value of these foreign currency option contracts, we expect reductions in revenue and net income in 2016 due to the foreign exchange translation impact of approximately $40 million and $20 million, respectively, based on current exchange rates.

The transaction impact on financial results is common for apparel companies operating outside the United States that purchase goods because these goods are often purchased in United States dollars, byas is the case with most of our foreign subsidiaries.operations. As with translation, during times of a strengthening United States dollar, our results of operations will be negatively impacted from these transactions becauseas the United States dollar-based inventory converts into a higher amount ofincreased local currency value of inventory and thus aresults in higher local currency cost of goods sold in local currency when the goods are sold. We also have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to certain intercompany loans. We currently use and plan to continue to use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to mitigate the cash flow or market value risks associated with these inventory and intercompany transactions, but we are unable to entirely eliminate these risks. We expect a reduction in net income in 2016 due to the foreign exchange transaction impact of approximately $110 million, based on current exchange rates.

Included in the calculations of expense and liabilities for our pension plans are various assumptions, including return on assets, discount rates, mortality rates and future compensation increases. Actual results could differ from these assumptions, which would require adjustments to our balance sheet and could result in volatility in our future pension expense. Holding all other assumptions constant, a 0.25% increase or decrease in the assumed discount rate would decrease or increase, respectively, 20152016 net pension expense by approximately $34$28 million.




ITEM 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating & Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating & Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including each of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

44



There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


45



PART II – OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to certain litigations which, in management’s judgment based in part on the opinions of legal counsel, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position.


ITEM 1A - RISK FACTORS

Please refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015January 31, 2016 for a description of certain significant risks and uncertainties to which our business, operations and financial condition are subject. There have been no material changes to these risk factors as of August 2, 2015July 31, 2016.


ITEM 2 - UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES(1)


           Period
(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(2)
 
(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)(2)
 (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
May 4, 2015 -       
May 31, 20151,404
 $108.21
 —
 $—
June 1, 2015 -       
July 5, 201521,756
 115.42
 —
 500,000,000
July 6, 2015 -       
August 2, 2015131,695
 114.64
 130,853
 485,000,016
Total154,855
 $114.69
 130,853
 $485,000,016
           Period
(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(1)(2)
 
(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)(1)(2)
 
(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)
 
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
May 2, 2016 -       
May 29, 2016165,531
 $89.99
 155,500
 $309,333,797
May 30, 2016 -       
July 3, 2016417,018
 93.44
 407,000
 271,371,557
July 4, 2016 -       
July 31, 2016277,998
 96.32
 277,500
 244,643,303
Total860,547
 $93.71
 840,000
 $244,643,303
                      
(1) On June 1, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized us, effective June 3, 2015, to repurchase up to $500 million of our outstanding common stock. The Board of Director’s authorization is effective through June 3, 2018. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time over the period through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions or other methods, as we deem appropriate. Purchases are made based on a variety of factors, such as price, corporate requirements and overall market conditions, applicable legal requirements and limitations, restrictions under our debt arrangements, trading restrictions under our insider trading policy, and other relevant factors. The program may be modified, including to increase or decrease the repurchase limitation or extend, suspend, or terminate the program, by us at any time, without prior notice.

(2) Our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan provides us with the right to deduct or withhold, or require employees to remit to us, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements applicable to stock-based compensation awards. To the extent permitted, employees may elect to satisfy all or part of such withholding requirements by tendering previously owned shares or by having us withhold shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory tax withholding rate that could be imposed on the transaction. Included in this table are shares withheld during the second quarter of 20152016 principally in connection with the settlement of vested restricted stock units and restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding requirements, in addition to the shares repurchased as part of the stock repurchase program discussed above.





46



ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:
   
3.1
 Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 1977); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 27, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3B to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 1985); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 2, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1988); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1994); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 20, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 28, 1996); Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007); Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 23, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 29, 2011).
   
3.2
 Certificate of Designation of Series A Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock, filed June 10, 1986 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the document filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 1986).
   
3.3
 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2003); Corrected Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, dated April 17, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2003).
   
3.4
 Certificate Eliminating Reference to Series B Convertible Preferred Stock From Certificate of Incorporation of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, filed June 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007).
   
3.5
 Certificate Eliminating Reference to Series A Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock From Certificate of Incorporation of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 28, 2007).
   
3.6
 Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2010).
   
3.7
 Certificate Eliminating Reference to Series A Convertible Preferred Stock From Certificate of Incorporation of PVH Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 3, 2013).
   
3.8
 By-Laws of PVH Corp., as amended through February 2, 2012April 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on FebruaryMay 3, 2012)2016).
   
4.1
 Specimen of Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011).
   

47



4.2
 Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 33-50751) filed on October 26, 1993); First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 17, 2002 to Indenture dated as of November 1, 1993 between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2002); Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 12, 2002 to Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2003); Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2013 to Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between PVH Corp. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2013).
   
4.3
 Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).
   
4.4
 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 8, 2012, to Indenture dated as of May 6, 2010, between PVH Corp. (formerly known as “Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013).
   
4.5
 Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2012, between PVH Corp. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 20, 2012).
   
10.14.6
 Indenture, dated as of June 20, 2016, between PVH Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan,, U.S. Bank National Association, as amendedTrustee, Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, as Paying Agent and restated effective April 30, 2015Authenticating Agent, and Elavon Financial Services Limited, as Transfer Agent and Registrar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 22, 2015)20, 2016).
+10.1
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2016, entered into by and among PVH Corp., PVH B.V. (formerly known as Tommy Hilfiger B.V.), the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto, each Lender party thereto, each Issuing Bank party thereto, the Swing Line Lender party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

   
+10.2
 
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated asSchedule of July 31, 2015, between PVH B.V. and Fred Gehring.Non-Management Directors’ Fees, effective June 16, 2016.

   
+31.1
 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.
   
+31.2
 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.
   
  *,+32.1
 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
   
  *,+32.2
 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
  


+101.INS
 XBRL Instance Document
   
+101.SCH
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
   
+101.CAL
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document


   
+101.DEF
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
   
+101.LAB
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
+101.PRE
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

48



   
  +Filed or furnished herewith.

* Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



49


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 PVH CORP.
 Registrant
 

Dated:September 3, 20151, 2016
/s/ Bruce Goldstein
JAMES W. HOLMES
  Bruce GoldsteinJames W. Holmes
  Senior Vice President and Controller (Chief Accounting Officer)


50



Exhibit Index

Exhibit    Description
10.210.1
ThirdSecond Amendment to Amended and Restated EmploymentCredit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2015, betweenMay 19, 2016, entered into by and among PVH Corp., PVH B.V. (formerly known as Tommy Hilfiger B.V.), the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto, each Lender party thereto, each Issuing Bank party thereto, the Swing Line Lender party thereto and Fred Gehring.Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

10.2

Schedule of Non-Management Directors’ Fees, effective June 16, 2016.

  
31.1Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.1Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
  
32.2Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
  
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
  
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
  
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
  
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
  
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
  
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
  


5154