UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016



o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-07982

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



South Dakota (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		46-0246171 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

205 East 6th Street, P.O. Box 5107, Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107

(Address of principal executive offices)

(605) 336-2750

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þo Yes oþ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þo Yes oþ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

As of ~~May 23, 2016~~February 3, 2017 there were ~~36,158,806~~36,076,259 shares of common stock, $1 par value, of Raven Industries, Inc. outstanding. There were no other classes of stock outstanding.

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

INDEX



	PAGE

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)	3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)	4
Consolidated Statements Shareholders' Equity (unaudited)	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1718
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks	2730
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	2730

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	2733
Item 1A. Risk Factors	2733
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2833
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2833
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	2833
Item 5. Other Information	2833
Item 6. Exhibits	2834
Signatures	2935

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)


(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data)	April 30, 2016			January 31, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			January 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32,790		$	33,782		$	47,452		$	40,123		$	33,782		$	47,302
Short-term investments	—			—			250			—			—			250
Accounts receivable, net	41,013			38,069			45,233			38,645			38,069			39,889
Inventories	46,950			45,888			58,981			45,502			45,839			54,066
Deferred income taxes	—			3,110			3,581			—			3,110			3,539
Other current assets	5,343			4,884			6,361			4,958			4,429			3,808
Total current assets	126,096			125,733			161,858			129,228			125,229			148,854

Property, plant and equipment, net	113,767			116,162			118,429			110,706			115,704			118,291
Goodwill	44,900			44,756			52,216			40,752			40,672			52,198
Amortizable intangible assets, net	15,660			15,832			17,735			12,888			12,956			17,148
Other assets	4,245			4,127			4,359			3,783			4,127			4,139
TOTAL ASSETS	$	304,668		$	306,610		$	354,597		$	297,357		$	298,688		$	340,630

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	9,356		$	6,038		$	9,123		$	10,076		$	6,038		$	6,958
Accrued liabilities	12,739			12,042			16,735			14,085			12,042			14,049
Customer advances	809			739			1,008			913			739			1,043
Total current liabilities	22,904			18,819			26,866			25,074			18,819			22,050

Other liabilities	17,259			18,926			25,581			13,827			15,640			24,244

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized shares 100,000; issued 67,041; 67,006; and 66,999, respectively	67,041			67,006			66,999
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized shares 100,000; issued 67,060; 67,006; and 67,006, respectively										67,060			67,006			67,006
Paid-in capital	54,755			54,830			53,275			54,962			53,907			53,909
Retained earnings	233,926			233,156			244,055			229,959			229,443			243,310
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2,891		)	(3,501		)	(5,863		)	(3,158		)	(3,501		)	(5,822		)
Treasury stock at cost, 30,882; 30,500; and 29,047 shares, respectively	(88,402		)	(82,700		)	(56,406		)
Treasury stock at cost, 30,984; 30,500; and 29,447 shares, respectively										(90,402		)	(82,700		)	(64,187		)
Total Raven Industries, Inc. shareholders' equity	264,429			268,791			302,060			258,421			264,155			294,216
Noncontrolling interest	76			74			90			35			74			120
Total shareholders' equity	264,505			268,865			302,150			258,456			264,229			294,336
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	304,668		$	306,610		$	354,597		$	297,357		$	298,688		$	340,630

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per-share data)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Net sales	$	68,360		$	70,273		$	67,598		$	67,518		$	135,958		$	137,791
Cost of sales	48,684			49,914			48,683			49,660			96,926			99,574
Gross profit	19,676			20,359			18,915			17,858			39,032			38,217

Research and development expenses	4,409			3,536			3,915			3,216			8,324			6,752
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	7,660			9,609			8,304			8,213			15,962			17,822
Operating income	7,607			7,214			6,696			6,429			14,746			13,643

Other (expense), net	(97		)	(44		)	(209		)	(266		)	(306		)	(310		)
Income before income taxes	7,510			7,170			6,487			6,163			14,440			13,333

Income taxes	1,985			2,309			1,993			1,942			4,427			4,251
Net income	5,525			4,861			4,494			4,221			10,013			9,082

Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	2			6
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest							(1		)	30			1			36

Net income attributable to Raven Industries, Inc.	$	5,523		$	4,855		$	4,495		$	4,191		$	10,012		$	9,046

Net income per common share:
─ Basic	$	0.15		$	0.13		$	0.12		$	0.11		$	0.28		$	0.24
─ Diluted	$	0.15		$	0.13		$	0.12		$	0.11		$	0.28		$	0.24

Cash dividends paid per common share	$	0.13		$	0.13		$	0.13		$	0.13		$	0.26		$	0.26

Comprehensive income:
Net income	$	5,525		$	4,861		$	4,494		$	4,221		$	10,013		$	9,082

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation	612			(69		)	(265		)	(105		)	347			(174		)
Postretirement benefits, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(1) and $29, respectively	(2		)	55
Postretirement benefits, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $1, ($62), $2, and ($33), respectively							(2		)	146			(4		)	201
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	610			(14		)	(267		)	41			343			27

Comprehensive income	6,135			4,847			4,227			4,262			10,356			9,109

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	2			6
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest							(1		)	30			1			36

Comprehensive income attributable to Raven Industries, Inc.	$	6,133		$	4,841
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Raven Industries, Inc.							$	4,228		$	4,232		$	10,355		$	9,073

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(unaudited)



	td Par Common Stock		Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock				Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Raven Industries, Inc. Equity			Non- controlling Interest		Total Equity			td Par Common Stock		Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock				Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Raven Industries, Inc. Equity			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity
(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)						Shares	Cost																						Shares	Cost
Balance January 31, 2015	$	66,947	$	53,237		28,897	$	(53,362	)	$	244,180		$	(5,849	)	$	305,153		$	84	$	305,237		$	66,947	$	53,237		28,897	$	(53,362	)	$	244,180		$	(5,849	)	$	305,153		$	84		$	305,237
Net income	—		—			—	—			4,855			—			4,855			6		4,861			—		—			—	—			9,046			—			9,046			36			9,082
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—	—			—			(69		)	(69		)	—		(69		)	—		—			—	—			—			(174		)	(174		)	—			(174		)
Postretirement benefits reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) after tax benefit of $29	—		—			—	—			—			55			55			—		55
Cash dividends ($0.13 per share)	—		40			—	—			(4,980		)	—			(4,940		)	—		(4,940		)
Postretirement benefits reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) after tax (expense) of ($33)																								—		—			—	—			—			201			201			—			201
Cash dividends ($0.26 per share)																								—		82			—	—			(9,916		)	—			(9,834		)	—			(9,834		)
Share issuance costs related to fiscal 2015 business combination	—		(15		)	—	—			—			—			(15		)	—		(15		)	—		(15		)	—	—			—			—			(15		)	—			(15		)
Shares issued on stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes																								7		(54		)	—	—			—			—			(47		)	—			(47		)
Shares issued on vesting of stock units, net of shares withheld for employee taxes	52		(510		)	—	—			—			—			(458		)	—		(458		)	52		(510		)	—	—			—			—			(458		)	—			(458		)
Shares repurchased	—		—			150	(3,044		)	—			—			(3,044		)	—		(3,044		)	—		—			550	(10,825		)	—			—			(10,825		)	—			(10,825		)
Share-based compensation	—		752			—	—			—			—			752			—		752			—		1,436			—	—			—			—			1,436			—			1,436
Income tax impact related to share-based compensation	—		(229		)	—	—			—			—			(229		)	—		(229		)	—		(267		)	—	—			—			—			(267		)	—			(267		)
Balance April 30, 2015	$	66,999	$	53,275		29,047	$	(56,406	)	$	244,055		$	(5,863	)	$	302,060		$	90	$	302,150
Balance July 31, 2015																								$	67,006	$	53,909		29,447	$	(64,187	)	$	243,310		$	(5,822	)	$	294,216		$	120		$	294,336


Balance January 31, 2016	$	67,006	$	54,830		30,500	$	(82,700	)	$	233,156		$	(3,501	)	$	268,791		$	74	$	268,865		$	67,006	$	53,907		30,500	$	(82,700	)	$	229,443		$	(3,501	)	$	264,155		$	74		$	264,229
Net income	—		—			—	—			5,523			—			5,523			2		5,525			—		—			—	—			10,012			—			10,012			1			10,013
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—	—			—			612			612			—		612			—		—			—	—			—			347			347			—			347
Postretirement benefits reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) after tax (expense) of ($1)	—		—			—	—			—			(2		)	(2		)	—		(2		)
Cash dividends ($0.13 per share)	—		52			—	—			(4,753		)	—			(4,701		)	—		(4,701		)
Postretirement benefits reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) after tax benefit of $2																								—		—			—	—			—			(4		)	(4		)	—			(4		)
Cash dividends ($0.26 per share)																								—		108			—	—			(9,496		)	—			(9,388		)	—			(9,388		)
Dividends of less than wholly-owned subsidiary paid to noncontrolling interest																								—		—			—	—			—			—			—			(40		)	(40		)
Shares issued on vesting of stock units, net of shares withheld for employee taxes	35		(291		)	—	—			—			—			(256		)	—		(256		)	35		(291		)	—	—			—			—			(256		)	—			(256		)
Director shares issued																								19		(19		)	—	—			—			—			—			—			—
Shares repurchased	—		—			382	(5,702		)	—			—			(5,702		)	—		(5,702		)	—		—			484	(7,702		)	—			—			(7,702		)	—			(7,702		)
Share-based compensation	—		456			—	—			—			—			456			—		456			—		1,574			—	—			—			—			1,574			—			1,574
Income tax impact related to share-based compensation	—		(292		)	—	—			—			—			(292		)	—		(292		)	—		(317		)	—	—			—			—			(317		)	—			(317		)
Balance April 30, 2016	$	67,041	$	54,755		30,882	$	(88,402	)	$	233,926		$	(2,891	)	$	264,429		$	76	$	264,505
Balance July 31, 2016																								$	67,060	$	54,962		30,984	$	(90,402	)	$	229,959		$	(3,158	)	$	258,421		$	35		$	258,456

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	5,525		$	4,861		$	10,013		$	9,082
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	4,186			4,363			7,633			8,782
Change in fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration	82			212			124			405
Loss (gain) from equity investment	3			(2		)
Loss from equity investment							82			73
Deferred income taxes	1,554			110			1,057			(1,301		)
Share-based compensation expense	456			752			1,574			1,436
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(2,648		)	10,756			(505		)	15,824
Inventories	(980		)	(4,496		)	391			(559		)
Other assets	(1,071		)	(3,218		)	(871		)	(714		)
Operating liabilities	4,075			(4,105		)	6,244			(9,090		)
Other operating activities, net	(78		)	(210		)	(184		)	(237		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	11,104			9,023			25,558			23,701

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures	(791		)	(5,000		)	(2,168		)	(7,333		)
Proceeds related to business acquisitions	—			351			—			351
Proceeds from sale or maturity of investments							250			—
Purchases of investments	(500		)	—			(500		)	—
Proceeds from sale of assets	50			380			1,117			1,542
Other investing activities	(194		)	(164		)	(339		)	(391		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,435		)	(4,433		)	(1,640		)	(5,831		)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid	(4,701		)	(4,940		)	(9,428		)	(9,834		)
Payments for common shares repurchased	(5,702		)	(2,563		)	(7,702		)	(10,825		)
Payments of acquisition-related contingent liability	(138		)	(614		)	(282		)	(735		)
Debt issuance costs paid	—			(454		)	—			(548		)
Restricted stock units vested and issued	(256		)	(458		)	(256		)	(458		)
Other financing activities, net	—			(15		)
Employee stock option exercises net of tax benefit							—			(85		)
Other financing activities							—			(15		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(10,797		)	(9,044		)	(17,668		)	(22,500		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	136			(43		)	91			(17		)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(992		)	(4,497		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							6,341			(4,647		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	33,782			51,949			33,782			51,949
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	32,790		$	47,452		$	40,123		$	47,302

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

Raven Industries, Inc. (the Company or Raven) is a diversified technology company providing a variety of products to customers within the industrial, agricultural, energy, construction, and military/aerospace markets. The Company is comprised of three unique operating units, or divisions, classified into reportable segments: Applied Technology, Engineered Films, and Aerostar.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial information, which includes the accounts of Raven and its wholly-owned or controlled subsidiaries, net of intercompany balances and transactions which have been eliminated, has been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, it does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. This financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of this financial information have been included. Financial results for the interim three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending January 31, 2017. The January 31, 2016 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Noncontrolling interests represent capital contributions, income and loss attributable to the owners of less than wholly-owned consolidated entities. The Company owns a 75% interest in an entity consolidated under the Aerostar business segment. Given the Company's majority ownership interest, the accounts of the business venture have been consolidated with the accounts of the Company, and a noncontrolling interest has been recorded for the noncontrolling investor interests in the net assets and operations of the business venture.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

As described in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Company's Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets using fair value measurement techniques if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset is below the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset group which contains the long-lived and intangible assets being assessed. The cash flows used for this analysis are similar to those used in the goodwill impairment assessment discussed further below. However, the cash flows are undiscounted and are projected over the life of the "primary asset" within the asset group being assessed.

As also described in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, the Company recognizes goodwill as the excess cost of an acquired business over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Management assesses goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter and between annual tests whenever a triggering event indicates there may be an impairment. Impairment tests of goodwill are done at the reporting unit level. When performing goodwill impairment testing, the fair values of reporting units are determined based on valuation techniques using the best available information, primarily discounted cash flow projections. Such valuations are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable (Level 3 fair value measures).

In the fiscal 2016 second quarter the Company determined that a triggering event occurred for its Engineered Films reporting unit and long-lived asset group primarily driven by the continuation of the substantial decline in energy market demand as a result of lower oil prices year-over-year. As a result of these changes in circumstances indicating that these assets might be impaired, the Company concluded that interim Step 1 goodwill and long-lived asset impairment assessments were necessary for the Engineered Films reporting unit and asset group.

The Company performed the Step 1 long-lived asset impairment test. The Company determined that the relevant cash flows for long-lived asset testing (the lowest level of cash flows that are largely independent of other assets) are at the Engineered Films

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

reporting unit level. Using the sum of the undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset group, the Step 1 test was performed for the asset group. The undiscounted cash flows for the Engineered Films asset group exceeded the carrying value of the long-lived assets by more than $100,000, or approximately 150%, and no Step 2 was deemed to be necessary based on the recoverability of the long-lived assets.

The Company performed a Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis using fair value techniques on the Engineered Films reporting unit as a result of changes in market conditions indicating that goodwill might be impaired. The reporting unit's fair value was estimated based on discounted cash flows and that fair value amount was compared to the net book value of the assets of the reporting unit. This analysis indicated that the estimated fair value of the Engineered Films reporting unit exceeded the net book value by approximately $50,000, or approximately 40%, and that Step 1 test was passed at July 31, 2015.

Based on the Company’s review of reporting units for each ~~reporting unit’s operating results~~period, the Company identified no indicators of impairment for the ~~three-month period ended April 30, 2016, no triggering events were identified~~Company's reporting units or asset groups, and as such no further impairment analysis was required under the applicable accounting ~~guidance.~~guidance for the three- or six-month periods ended July 31, 2016.

There have been no material changes to the Company's significant accounting policies as described in the Company's Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.

(3) NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares and stock units outstanding. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding which includes the shares issuable upon exercise of employee stock options (net of shares assumed purchased with the option proceeds), stock units, and restricted stock units outstanding. Performance share awards are included in the diluted calculation based upon what would be issued if the end of the most recent reporting period was the end of the term of the award.

Certain outstanding options and restricted stock units were excluded from the diluted net income per-share calculations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method.

~~(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)~~

The options and restricted stock units excluded from the diluted net income per-share share calculation were as follows:

Three Months Ended
April 30,
2016 April 30,
2015
Anti-dilutive options and restricted stock units 1,005,163 1,103,707



	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	July 31, 2016	July 31, 2015	July 31, 2016	July 31, 2015
Anti-dilutive options and restricted stock units	924,204	1,207,761	1,102,952	1,156,704

The computation of earnings per share is presented below:


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 30, 2016		April 30, 2015		July 31, 2016		July 31, 2015		July 31, 2016		July 31, 2015
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Raven Industries, Inc.	$	5,523	$	4,855	$	4,495	$	4,191	$	10,012	$	9,046

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	36,319,918		38,000,775		36,097,228		37,659,107		36,208,573		37,829,941
Weighted average stock units outstanding	93,986		69,492		110,083		91,831		102,035		80,661
Denominator for basic calculation	36,413,904		38,070,267		36,207,311		37,750,938		36,310,608		37,910,602

Weighted average common shares outstanding	36,319,918		38,000,775		36,097,228		37,659,107		36,208,573		37,829,941
Weighted average stock units outstanding	93,986		69,492		110,083		91,831		102,035		80,661
Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock units	52,234		131,637		43,001		76,662		51,547		80,688
Denominator for diluted calculation	36,466,138		38,201,904		36,250,312		37,827,600		36,362,155		37,991,290

Net income per share - basic	$	0.15	$	0.13	$	0.12	$	0.11	$	0.28	$	0.24
Net income per share - diluted	$	0.15	$	0.13	$	0.12	$	0.11	$	0.28	$	0.24

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

(4) SELECTED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

Following are the components of selected items from the Consolidated Balance Sheets:


	April 30, 2016			January 31, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			January 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Accounts receivable, net:
Trade accounts	$	42,041		$	39,103		$	45,686		$	39,203		$	39,103		$	40,370
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(1,028		)	(1,034		)	(453		)	(558		)	(1,034		)	(481		)
	$	41,013		$	38,069		$	45,233		$	38,645		$	38,069		$	39,889

Inventories:
Finished goods	$	4,570		$	4,896		$	9,127		$	4,784		$	4,896		$	6,657
In process	1,751			1,845			2,533			1,929			1,845			3,957
Materials	40,629			39,147			47,321			38,789			39,098			43,452
	$	46,950		$	45,888		$	58,981
										$	45,502		$	45,839		$	54,066
Other current assets:
Insurance policy benefit	$	742		$	716		$	683		$	762		$	716		$	637
Federal tax receivable	1,719			2,176			—			1,652			1,721			—
Receivable from sale of business	205			255			789			103			255			830
Prepaid expenses and other	2,677			1,737			4,889			2,441			1,737			2,341
	$	5,343		$	4,884		$	6,361		$	4,958		$	4,429		$	3,808

Property, plant and equipment, net:
Held for use:
Land	$	3,054		$	3,054		$	3,246		$	3,054		$	3,054		$	2,921
Buildings and improvements	77,901			77,827			78,661			78,340			77,827			76,697
Machinery and equipment	141,798			140,995			135,154			142,709			140,996			136,666
Accumulated depreciation	(109,786		)	(106,514		)	(99,538		)	(112,843		)	(106,419		)	(99,346		)
	$	112,967		$	115,362		$	117,523
Accumulated impairment										(554		)	(554		)	—
										$	110,706		$	114,904		$	116,938
Held for sale:
Land	$	244		$	244		$	11		$	—		$	244		$	324
Buildings and improvements	1,595			1,595			1,522			—			1,595			2,597
Machinery and equipment	329			329			—			—			329			639
Accumulated depreciation	(1,368		)	(1,368		)	(627		)	—			(1,368		)	(2,207		)
	800			800			906			—			800			1,353
	$	113,767		$	116,162		$	118,429		$	110,706		$	115,704		$	118,291

Other assets:
Equity investments	$	2,813		$	2,805		$	3,095		$	2,611		$	2,805		$	2,896
Deferred income taxes	25			—			—			38			—			—
Other	1,407			1,322			1,264			1,134			1,322			1,243
	$	4,245		$	4,127		$	4,359
										$	3,783		$	4,127		$	4,139
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries and related	$	1,874		$	1,883		$	3,035		$	3,628		$	1,883		$	2,031
Benefits	3,945			3,864			4,655			3,632			3,864			4,315
Insurance obligations	1,893			1,730			1,629			1,975			1,730			1,702
Warranties	2,316			1,835			2,285			2,076			1,835			1,752
Income taxes	654			475			1,824			213			475			1,108
Other taxes	1,008			1,117			936			1,357			1,117			1,031
Acquisition-related contingent consideration	454			407			938			381			407			1,028
Other	595			731			1,433			823			731			1,082
	$	12,739		$	12,042		$	16,735		$	14,085		$	12,042		$	14,049

Other liabilities:
Postretirement benefits	$	7,678		$	7,662		$	11,976		$	7,706		$	7,662		$	12,151
Acquisition-related contingent consideration	2,338			2,499			3,046			1,565			1,732			3,049
Deferred income taxes	4,202			5,426			7,278			1,557			3,247			5,764
Uncertain tax positions	3,041			3,339			3,281			2,999			2,999			3,280
	$	17,259		$	18,926		$	25,581		$	13,827		$	15,640		$	24,244

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

(5) ACQUISITIONS OF AND INVESTMENTS IN BUSINESSES AND TECHNOLOGIES

Ag-Eagle Aerial Systems, Inc.

In February 2016, the Applied Technology Division acquired an interest of approximately 5% in AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (AgEagle). AgEagle is a privately held company that is a leading provider of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) used for agricultural applications. Contemporaneously with the execution of this agreement, AgEagle and the Company entered into a distribution agreement whereby the Company was appointed as the sole and exclusive distributor worldwide of the existing AgEagle system as it pertains to the agriculture market. This investment and distribution agreement will allow the Company to expand into the UAS market for agriculture, enhancing its existing product offerings to provide actionable data that customers can use to make important input decisions.

AgEagle is considered a variable interest entity (VIE) and the Company’s equity ownership interest in AgEagle is considered a variable interest. The Company accounts for its investment in AgEagle under the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating policies of AgEagle through the Company's representation on AgEagle's Board of Directors and the distribution agreement. However, the Company is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the entity.

At the acquisition date, the Company determined that the exclusivity of the distribution agreement resulted in an intangible asset. The purchase price was allocated between the equity ownership interest and this intangible asset which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the four-year life of the distribution agreement.

Acquisition-related Contingent Consideration

The Company has contingent liabilities related to prior year acquisitions of SBG Innovatie BV and its affiliate, Navtronics BVBA (collectively, SBG) in May 2014 and Vista Research, Inc. (Vista) in January 2012. The fair value of such contingent consideration is estimated as of the acquisition date, and subsequently at the end of each reporting period, using forecasted cash flows. Projecting future cash flows requires the Company to make significant estimates and assumptions regarding future events, conditions, or revenues being achieved under the subject contingent agreement as well as the appropriate discount rate. Such valuations techniques include one or more significant inputs that are not observable (Level 3 fair value measures).

In connection with the acquisition of SBG, Raven is committed to making additional earn-out payments, not to exceed $2,500, calculated and paid quarterly for ten years after the purchase date contingent upon achieving certain revenues. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, the fair value of this contingent consideration was ~~$1,491,~~$1,397, of which ~~$237~~$228 was classified as "Accrued liabilities" and ~~$1,254~~$1,169 was classified as "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015, the fair value of this contingent consideration was ~~$1,410,~~$1,325, of which ~~$287~~$310 was classified as "Accrued liabilities" and ~~$1,123~~$1,015 as "Other liabilities." The Company paid ~~$59~~$143 and ~~$29~~$203 in earn-out payments in the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, respectively. The Company paid $121 and $150 in earn-out payments in the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015, respectively. To date, the Company has paid a total of ~~$367~~$511 of this potential earn-out liability.

Related to the acquisition of Vista in 2012, the Company is committed to making annual payments based upon earn-out percentages on specific revenue streams for seven years after the purchase date, not to exceed $15,000. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, the fair value of this contingent consideration was ~~$1,279,~~$504, of which ~~$195~~$108 was classified in "Accrued liabilities" and ~~$1,084~~$396 as "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015 the fair value of this contingent consideration was ~~$2,571,~~$2,720, of which ~~$648~~$686 was classified as "Accrued liabilities" and ~~$1,923~~$2,034 as "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company paid $79 and $585 in the six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company made no payments in the three-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 ~~and~~or 2015, respectively. To date, the Company has paid a total of $1,471 of this potential earn-out liability.

(6) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

The Company performs impairment reviews of goodwill by reporting unit. At the end of fiscal 2016, the Company determined it had four reporting units: Engineered Films Division; Applied Technology Division; and two separate reporting units in the Aerostar Division, one of which is Vista and one of which is all other Aerostar operations (Aerostar excluding Vista).

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, management implemented ~~operations~~managerial and financial reporting changes within Vista and Aerostar to further integrate ~~the operations of~~ Vista into the Aerostar ~~operations.~~Division. Integration actions included leadership re-alignment, including selling and business development functions; re-deployment of employees across the division; and consolidation of administrative functions, among other actions. Based on the changes made, the Company has consolidated the two separate reporting units within the Aerostar Division into one reporting unit for the purposes of goodwill impairment review. As such, as of April 30, 2016, the Company has three reporting units: Engineered Films Division, Applied Technology Division, and Aerostar Division. The

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

Company reviewed the quantitative and qualitative factors associated with the change in reporting unit and determined there were no indicators of impairment at the time of the reporting unit change.

There were no goodwill or long-lived asset impairment losses reported in the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 or July 31, 2015, respectively.

(7) EMPLOYEE POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company provides postretirement medical and other benefits to certain senior executive officers and senior managers. These plan obligations are unfunded. The components of the net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits are as follows:


	Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Service cost	$	20		$	108	$	20		$	108	$	40		$	216
Interest cost	83			105		83			105		166			210
Amortization of actuarial losses	37			84		37			84		74			168
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost	(40		)	—		(40		)	—		$	(80	)	$	—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	100		$	297	$	100		$	297	$	200		$	594

Postretirement benefit cost components are reclassified in their entirety from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net periodic benefit cost. Net periodic benefit costs are reported in net income as “Cost of sales” or “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” in a manner consistent with the classification of direct labor and personnel costs of the eligible employees.

(8) WARRANTIES

Accruals necessary for product warranties are estimated based on historical warranty costs and average time elapsed between purchases and returns for each division. Additional accruals are made for any significant, discrete warranty issues. Changes in the warranty accrual were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Beginning balance	$	1,835		$	3,120		$	2,316		$	2,285		$	1,835		$	3,120
Accrual for warranties	824			359			262			389			1,086			748
Settlements made	(343		)	(1,194		)	(502		)	(922		)	(845		)	(2,116		)
Ending balance	$	2,316		$	2,285		$	2,076		$	1,752		$	2,076		$	1,752

(9) FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

The Company entered into a credit facility on April 15, 2015 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch as Canadian Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto (the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement provides for a syndicated senior revolving credit facility up to $125,000 with a maturity date of April 15, 2020. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), a participating lender under the Credit Agreement, holds the majority of the Company's cash and cash equivalents. One member of the Company's Board of Directors, who served through May 2016, is also on the Board of Directors of Wells Fargo & Company, the parent company of Wells Fargo.

Unamortized debt issuance costs associated with this Credit Agreement were ~~$434~~$407 and ~~$548~~$516 at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and ~~2015.~~2015, respectively and are included in "Other assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Loans or borrowings defined under the Credit Agreement bear interest and fees at varying rates and terms defined in the Credit Agreement based on the type of borrowing as defined. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including those relating to financial reporting and notification, limits on levels of indebtedness and liens, investments, mergers and acquisitions, affiliate transactions, sales of assets, restrictive agreements, and change in control as defined in the Credit Agreement. Financial covenants include an interest coverage ratio and funded indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization as defined in the Credit Agreement. The loan proceeds may be utilized by Raven for strategic business purposes and for working capital needs.

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

Simultaneous with execution of the Credit Agreement, Raven, Aerostar, Vista, and Integra entered into a guaranty agreement in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association in its capacity as administrator under the Credit Agreement for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Toronto Branch and the lenders and their affiliates under the Credit Agreement.

Letters of credit (LOCs) totaling $850 issued under a previous line of credit with Wells Fargo were outstanding at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015. These LOCs ~~which~~ primarily support self-insured workers' compensation ~~bonding requirements, are being transitioned to the Credit Agreement. As such, LOCs totaling $1,114 issued under each credit facility were outstanding at April 30,~~bonding. At July 31, 2016, ~~including~~

~~(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)~~

~~$464~~$464 of LOCs ~~issued~~were outstanding under the Credit ~~Agreement. Until such time as the transition of the remaining LOCs is complete, any~~Agreement and $50 issued by Wells Fargo was outstanding. Any draws required under the Wells Fargo ~~LOCs~~LOC would be settled with available cash or borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

There were no borrowings under either credit agreement for any of the fiscal periods covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Availability under the Credit Agreement for borrowings as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 was $124,536.

The Company has requested and received the necessary covenant waivers relating to its late filing of financial statement information.

(10) CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various claims and litigation. The Company has concluded that the ultimate outcome of these matters is not expected to be material to the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

(11) INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate varies from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state and local taxes, research and development tax credit, tax benefits on qualified production activities, and tax-exempt insurance premiums. The Company’s effective tax rates for the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 were 30.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015 were ~~26.4%~~31.5% and ~~32.2%~~31.9%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate iswas primarily due to the ~~permanent extension~~inclusion of ~~the research and development~~an R&D tax credit in the current period provision for income taxes. Congress permanently enacted this credit into law in the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~2016 and a discrete~~2016. No estimate of the R&D tax ~~benefit related to~~credit was included in the ~~prior fiscal year that was recorded in fiscal 2017 first quarter.~~provision for income taxes for the three- or six-month periods ended July 31, 2015.

As of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, undistributed earnings of approximately ~~$3,243~~$3,053 of the Canadian and European subsidiaries were considered to have been reinvested indefinitely and, accordingly, the Company has not provided United States income taxes on such earnings. This estimated tax liability would be approximately ~~$539~~$499 net of foreign tax credits.

(12) RESTRUCTURING COSTS

At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, there are no ongoing restructuring plans or unpaid restructuring costs. No restructuring costs were incurred in the ~~three-month period~~three- or six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016.

In the fiscal 2015 fourth quarter, the Company announced and implemented a restructuring plan to lower Applied Technology’s cost structure. In the same period, Engineered Films implemented a preemptive restructuring plan to address the decline in demand in the energy sector as the result of falling oil prices. The Company also initiated the exit of Applied Technology’s non-strategic St. Louis, Missouri contract manufacturing facility.

Exit activities related to this sale and transfer of these contract manufacturing operations were substantially completed during the fiscal 2016 first quarter. Gains of ~~$364~~$247 and $611 were recorded for the ~~three-month period~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015 as a result of the exit activity. Receivables for inventory and estimated future royalties pursuant to the sale agreements of ~~$789~~$827 were included in "Other current assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, such receivables were ~~$205.~~$103.

~~The~~In the fiscal 2017 second quarter, the land, building, and remaining equipment in St. Louis ~~is still~~that was owned and held for sale ~~at April 30, 2016.~~was sold. The ~~Company is actively marketing this facility at a sales~~selling price, ~~above~~net of all selling expenses, exceeded the net book value of ~~$800. Based~~the assets held for sale. A gain of $161 was recorded on ~~such activity, the Company does not believe an impairment is indicated as of April 30, 2016.~~this sale.

In the fiscal 2016 first quarter, the Company announced and implemented a restructuring plan to further lower its cost structure. The cost reductions covered all divisions and included the corporate offices, but were weighted to Applied Technology as a result of the decline in this business and the expectation of continued end-market weakness for this division.

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

The Company incurred restructuring costs for severance benefits of ~~$477~~$111 and $588 in the ~~three-month period~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30, 2015, including $55 of unpaid costs at April 30,~~July 31, 2015. The Company reported ~~$393~~$14 and $407 of ~~this expense~~these restructuring costs in "Cost of sales" ~~and the remaining $84 in "Selling, general, and administrative expenses"~~ in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive ~~Income.~~Income for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015, respectively, while $97 and $181 of these restructuring costs were reported in "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" in these periods. There were no unpaid costs at July 31, 2015. Substantially all of these restructuring costs related to the Applied Technology Division.

This restructuring plan was completed during fiscal 2016 second quarter.

(13) DIVIDENDS AND TREASURY STOCK

Dividends paid to Raven shareholders for the three and six months ended July 31, 2016 were ~~$4,701~~$4,687 and $9,388 or 13.0 cents and 26.0 cents per share, ~~during~~respectively. Dividends paid to Raven shareholders for the three and six months ended ~~April 30, 2016~~July 31, 2015 were $4,894 and ~~$4,940,~~$9,834, or 13.0 cents ~~during the three months ended April 30, 2015.~~

~~(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)~~

and 26.0 cents per share, respectively.

Effective March 21, 2016 the Board of Directors (Board) authorized an extension and increase of the authorized $40,000 stock buyback program in place. An additional $10,000 was authorized for share repurchases once the $40,000 authorization limit is reached.

Pursuant to these authorizations, the Company repurchased ~~382,065~~102,187 and ~~149,359~~484,252 shares in the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~July 31, 2016. These purchases totaled ~~$5,702~~$2,000 and ~~$3,044,~~$7,702, respectively. The Company repurchased400,599 and 549,958 shares in the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015. These purchases totaled $7,781 and $10,825, respectively. All such share repurchases were paid at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015, ~~$481~~$27 of such share repurchases were unpaid. The remaining dollar value authorized for share repurchases at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 is ~~$14,959~~$12,959. This authorization remains in place until such time as the authorized spending limit is reached or such authorization is revoked by the Board.

(14) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company reserves shares for issuance pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan effective March 23, 2012, administered by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Two types of awards, stock options and restricted stock units, were granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015.

Stock Option Awards

The Company granted 274,200 ~~and 280,200~~ non-qualified stock options during the ~~three-month~~six-month period ended July 31, 2016. None of these options were granted during the three-months ended July 31, 2016. The Company granted 9,400 and 289,600 non-qualified stock options during the three- and six-month periods ended ~~April 30, 2016 and~~July 31, 2015, respectively. Options are granted with exercise prices not less than the market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. The stock options vest over a four-year period and expire after five years. Options contain retirement and change-in-control provisions that may accelerate the vesting period. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within this valuation model.

The weighted average assumptions used for the Black-Scholes option pricing model by grant year are as follows:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 30, 2016		April 30, 2015		July 31, 2016		July 31, 2015
Risk-free interest rate	1.05	%	1.34	%	1.05	%	1.33	%
Expected dividend yield	3.33	%	2.59	%	3.33	%	2.59	%
Expected volatility factor	32.61	%	36.81	%	32.61	%	36.81	%
Expected option term (in years)	4.00		3.75		4.00		3.75

Weighted average grant date fair value	$3.05		$4.78		$3.05		$4.77

Restricted Stock Unit Awards (RSUs)

The Company granted 66,370 and 19,250 time-vested RSUs to employees in the ~~three-month~~six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. None of these awards were granted during the three-month periods ended July 31, 2016 or July 31, 2015. The grant date fair value of a time-vested RSU is measured based upon the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the day prior to the date of grant. The grant date fair value per share of the time-vested RSUs granted in the three months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and 2015 was $15.61 and $20.10, respectively. Time-vested RSUs will vest if, at the end of the three-year period, the

(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)

employee remains employed by the Company. RSUs contain retirement and change-in-control provisions that may accelerate the vesting period. Dividends are cumulatively earned on the time-vested RSUs over the vesting period.

The Company also granted performance-based RSUs in the ~~three-month~~six-month period ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016. The exact number of performance shares to be issued will vary from 0% to 150% of the target award, depending on the Company's actual performance over the three-year period in comparison to the target award. The target award for the fiscal 2017 and 2016 grants are based on return on equity (ROE), which is defined as net income divided by the average of beginning and ending shareholders' equity. The performance-based RSUs will vest if, at the end of the three-year performance period, the Company has achieved certain performance goals and the employee remains employed by the Company. RSUs contain retirement and change-in-control provisions that may accelerate the vesting period. Dividends are cumulatively earned on performance-based RSUs over the vesting period. The number of RSUs that will vest is determined by an estimated ROE target over the three-year performance period. The estimated ROE performance factors used to estimate the number of restricted stock units expected to vest are evaluated at least quarterly. The number of restricted stock units issued at the vesting date will be based on actual results.

The fair value of the performance-based restricted stock units is based upon the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the day prior to the grant date. The number of performance-based RSUs granted is based on 100% of the target award.

~~(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)~~

During the ~~three-month~~six-month periods ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company granted 72,950 and ~~66,330~~68,570 performance-based RSUs, respectively. No performance-based RSUs were granted in the three-month period ended July 31, 2016. 2,240 performance-based RSUs were granted in the three-month period ended July 31, 2015. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of ~~these~~the performance-based RSUs granted in the periods ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was $15.61 and ~~$20.10, respectively.~~$20.10.

(15) SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company's reportable segments are defined by their product lines which have been grouped in these segments based on common technologies, production methods, and inventories. Raven's reportable segments are Applied Technology, Engineered Films, and Aerostar. The Company measures the performance of its segments based on their operating income excluding administrative and general expenses. Other expense and income taxes are not allocated to individual operating segments, and assets not identifiable to an individual segment are included as corporate assets. Segment information is reported consistent with the Company's management reporting structure.

Business segment net sales and operating income results are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Net sales
Applied Technology	$	31,456		$	32,410		$	22,668		$	20,411		$	54,124		$	52,821
Engineered Films	29,100			31,321			36,656			35,789			65,756			67,110
Aerostar	7,895			6,554			8,415			11,328			16,310			17,882
Intersegment eliminations ^(a)	(91		)	(12		)	(141		)	(10		)	(232		)	(22		)
Consolidated net sales	$	68,360		$	70,273		$	67,598		$	67,518		$	135,958		$	137,791

Operating income
Applied Technology	$	8,693		$	8,741
Operating income (loss)
Applied Technology^{(b) (c)}							$	5,172		$	4,041		$	13,865		$	12,782
Engineered Films	3,878			4,471			6,659			5,365			10,537			9,836
Aerostar(d)	(621		)	(853		)	(251		)	1,314			(429		)	461
Intersegment eliminations^(a)	(5		)	59			—			25			(5		)	84
Total reportable segment income	11,945			12,418			11,580			10,745			23,968			23,163
Administrative and general expenses	(4,338		)	(5,204		)	(4,884		)	(4,316		)	(9,222		)	(9,520		)
Consolidated operating income	$	7,607		$	7,214		$	6,696		$	6,429		$	14,746		$	13,643

^(a)Intersegment sales for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 were primarily sales from Engineered Films to Aerostar.

^(b)Includes $161 gain for both the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 on the disposal of an idle manufacturing plant held for sale.

^(c) Includes gains of $247 and $611 for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015, respectively, on disposal of assets related to the exit of contract manufacturing operations.

^(d)Includes ($70) loss for both the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015 on disposal of an idle manufacturing plant held for sale.

(16) NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Accounting Standards Adopted

In November 2015 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes" (ASU 2015-17). Currently GAAP requires the deferred taxes for each jurisdiction (or tax-paying component of a jurisdiction) to be presented as a net current asset or liability and net noncurrent asset or liability. This requires a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis based on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which the underlying temporary differences relate, or, in the case of loss or credit carryforwards, based on the period in which the attribute is expected to be realized. To simplify presentation, ASU 2015-17 requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will now only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. The guidance does not change the existing requirement that only permits offsetting within a jurisdiction - that is, companies are still prohibited from offsetting deferred tax liabilities from one jurisdiction against deferred tax assets of another jurisdiction. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 in the fiscal 2017 first quarter using the prospective method. No current deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet. Since the Company adopted the guidance prospectively, the prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this update require an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement, or disclose in the notes, the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 when it became effective in the fiscal 2017 first quarter with no impact on its consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

In April 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, ~~"Intangibles-Goodwill~~"Intangibles - Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (CCA)" (ASU 2015-05). The amendments in ASU 2015-05 clarify existing GAAP guidance about a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a CCA with or without a software license. Examples of cloud computing arrangements include software as a service, platform as a service, infrastructure as a service, and other similar hosting arrangements. Under ASU 2015-05, fees paid by a customer in a CCA for a software license are within the scope of the internal-use software guidance if certain criteria are met. If the criteria are not met the fees paid are accounted for as a prepaid service contract and expensed. The Company has historically accounted for all fees in a CCA as a prepaid service contract. The Company adopted ASU 2015-05 in first quarter fiscal 2017 when it became effective using the prospective method. The Company did not pay any fees in a CCA in the current period that met the criteria to be in scope of the internal-use software guidance and it had no impact on the consolidated financial statements, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810) Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" (ASU 2015-02). The amendments in ASU 2015-02 affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments: 1. Modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities; 2. Eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; 3. Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships; and 4. Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17 "Consolidation (Topic 810) - Interests Held through Related Parties that are under Common Control" (ASU 2016-17) which amended ASU 2015-02. Under ASU 2016-17, the Company only needs to consider its proportionate indirect interest in the VIE held through a common control party when evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary. ASU 2015-02 required that the common control party's interest be treated as if it was the Company's interest when evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-02 ~~when it became effective~~ in first quarter fiscal 2017 and early adopted ASU 2016-17 in third quarter fiscal 2017. The Company reevaluated all of it legal entities and one investment accounted for using the equity method during the first quarter. In addition, ~~this guidance~~ASU 2015-02 was applied to the evaluation of the Company's investment in Ag Eagle in first quarter fiscal 2017 further discussed in Note 5 Acquisitions of and Investments in Businesses and Technologies of this Form 10-Q. The Company did not have an indirect interest in any of the entities through an unconsolidated related party. Under ASU 2015-02 and the amended

guidance in ASU 2016-17 neither of these equity method investments ~~qualify~~qualified for consolidation. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the legal entities consolidated or the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. No prior period retrospective adjustments were required.

In January 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items" (ASU 2015-01). The amendments in ASU 2015-01 eliminate the GAAP concept of extraordinary items and no longer requires that transactions that met the criteria for classification as extraordinary items be separately classified and reported in the financial statements. ASU 2015-01 retains the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently and expands them to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The Company adopted ASU 2015-01when it became effective in fiscal 2017 first quarter using the prospective method. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In August 2014 the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern" (ASU 2014-15). The amendments in ASU 2014-15 require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. ASU 2014-15 requires certain financial statement disclosures when there is "substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern" within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 in the fiscal 2017 first quarter when it became effective. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In ~~addition~~January 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) "Clarifying the Definition of a Business" (ASU 2017-01). This update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments provide a screen for determining when a set of assets and processes is not a business. If the ~~accounting pronouncements adopted~~screen is not met, the amendments require further consideration of inputs, substantive processes and ~~described above,~~outputs to determine whether a transaction is an acquisition of a business. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and are applied on a prospective basis. The Company is evaluating the ~~Company adopted various other accounting pronouncements that became effective in fiscal 2017 first quarter. None~~impact the adoption of this guidance ~~had a significant impact~~will have on ~~the Company's~~its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, ~~cash flows, or disclosures for the period.~~and disclosures.

In November 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory" (ASU 2016-16). Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. In addition, interpretations of this guidance have developed in practice over the years for transfers of certain intangible and tangible assets. This prohibition on recognition is an exception to the principle of comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes in GAAP. The new guidance eliminates the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company can early adopt ASU 2016-16, but earlier adoption must be in the first quarter of the fiscal year. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 will be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

~~New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted~~In August 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" (ASU 2016-15). The new guidance clarifies eight cash flow classification issues where current GAAP was either unclear or has no specific guidance. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. All entities may elect to early adopt ASU 2016-15 in any interim period. If an entity early adopts it must adopt all eight of the amendments in the same period and if early adopted in an interim period any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the year. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 will be applied using the modified retrospective transition method for each period presented. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the classification of certain items on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities may elect to early adopt ASU 2016-13 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 will be applied using the modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the first reporting period. The Company's trade accounts receivable are in-scope under ASU 2016-13. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

In March 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 amends the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions to require recognition of the tax effects resulting from the settlement of stock-based awards as discrete income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period in which they occur. In addition, this guidance requires that all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments, including the excess tax benefits related to the settlement of stock-based awards, be classified as cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The guidance also requires that cash paid ~~by directly withholding~~to taxing authorities on employee behalf for withheld shares ~~for tax withholding purposes~~should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. In addition, the guidance also allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest, consistent with current U.S. GAAP, or account for forfeitures when they occur. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. ASU 2016-09 requires that the various amendments be adopted using different methods. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" (ASU 2016-02). The primary difference between previous GAAP and ASU 2016-02 is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. The guidance requires a lessee to recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee (and a lessor) should include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. Similarly, optional payments to purchase the underlying asset should be included in the measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that purchase option. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. An entity that elects to apply the practical expedients will, in effect, continue to account for leases that commence before the effective date in accordance with previous GAAP unless the lease is modified, except that lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases at each reporting date based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments that were tracked and disclosed under previous GAAP. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

In May 2014 the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 provides a comprehensive new recognition model that requires recognition of revenue when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in FASB ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date (ASU 2015-14) and the standard is now effective for the Company for fiscal 2019 and interim periods therein. ASU 2014-09 may be adopted as of the original effective date, which for the Company is fiscal 2018. The guidance may be applied using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). In addition, FASB has amended Topic 606 prior to it becoming effective. In April 2016 FASB issued (ASU) No. 2016-10, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing" and in March 2016 FASB issued (ASU) No. 2016-08, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)". The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments to Topic 606 are the same as ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the method and date of adoption and the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and all subsequent amendments to Topic 606, will have on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and disclosures.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following commentary on the operating results, liquidity, capital resources, and financial condition of Raven Industries, Inc. (the Company or Raven) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) and the Company's Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2016.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Raven is a diversified technology company providing a variety of products to customers within the industrial, agricultural, energy, construction, defense/aerospace, and situational awareness markets. The Company is comprised of three unique operating divisions, classified into reportable segments: Applied Technology, Engineered Films, and Aerostar. As strategic actions have changed the Company’s business over the last several years, Raven has remained committed to providing high-quality, high-value products. The Company’s performance reflects our ongoing adjustment to conditions and opportunities.

Management uses a number of metrics to assess the Company's performance:

Consolidated net sales, gross ~~margins,~~margin, operating income, operating ~~margins,~~margin, net income, and earnings per share

Cash flow from operations and shareholder returns

Return on sales, assets, and equity

Segment net sales, gross profit, gross ~~margins,~~margin, operating income, and operating ~~margins~~margin

Vision and Strategy

At Raven, our purpose is to solve great challenges. Great challenges require great solutions. Raven’s three unique operating units share resources, ideas, and a passion to create technology that helps the world grow more food, produce more energy, protect the environment, and live safely.

The Raven business model is our platform for success. Our business model is defensible, sustainable, and gives us a consistent approach in the pursuit of quality financial results. This overall approach to creating value, which is employed across the three business segments, is summarized as follows:

Intentionally serve a set of diversified market segments with attractive near- and long-term growth prospects;

Consistently manage a pipeline of growth initiatives within our market segments;

Aggressively compete on quality, service, innovation, and peak performance;

Hold ourselves accountable for continuous improvement;

Value our balance sheet as a source of strength and stability with which to pursue strategic acquisitions; and

Make corporate responsibility a top priority.

The following discussion highlights the consolidated operating results for the ~~three-month periods~~three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 and 2015. Segment operating results are more fully explained in the Results of Operations - Segment Analysis section.


		Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands, except per-share data)		April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			% Change			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			% Change
Net sales		$	68,360		$	70,273		(2.7	)%		$	67,598		$	67,518		0.1	%	$	135,958		$	137,791		(1.3	)%
Gross profit		19,676			20,359			(3.4	)%		18,915			17,858			5.9	%	39,032			38,217			2.1	%
Gross margin		28.8		%	29.0		%				28.0		%	26.4		%			28.7		%	27.7		%
Operating income		$	7,607		$	7,214		5.4	%		$	6,696		$	6,429		4.2	%	$	14,746		$	13,643		8.1	%
Operating margin		11.1		%	10.3		%				9.9		%	9.5		%			10.8		%	9.9		%
Net income attributable to Raven Industries, Inc.		$	5,523		$	4,855		13.8	%		$	4,495		$	4,191		7.3	%	$	10,012		$	9,046		10.7	%
Diluted earnings per share		$	0.15		$	0.13					$	0.12		$	0.11				$	0.28		$	0.24

Operating cash flow		$	11,104		$	9,023		23.1	%										$	25,558		$	23,701		7.8	%
Capital expenditures		$	(791	)	$	(5,000	)	(84.2	)%										$	(2,168	)	$	(7,333	)	(70.4	)%
Cash dividends		$	(4,701	)	$	(4,940	)	(4.8	)%										$	(9,428	)	$	(9,834	)	(4.1	)%
Common share repurchases		$	(5,702	)	$	(3,044	)	87.3	%										$	(7,702	)	$	(10,825	)	(28.8	)%

^(a)The Company's gross and operating margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to the diversity of its operations and variability in the classification of expenses across industries in which the Company operates.	^(a)The Company's gross and operating margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to the diversity of its operations and variability in the classification of expenses across industries in which the Company operates.									^(a)The Company's gross and operating margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to the diversity of its operations and variability in the classification of expenses across industries in which the Company operates.

For the fiscal 2017 ~~first~~second quarter, net sales were ~~$68.4~~$67.6 million, ~~down $1.9~~up $0.1 million, or ~~2.7%~~0.1%, from ~~$70.3~~$67.5 million in last year’s ~~first~~second quarter. The Company's operating income for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2017 was ~~$7.6~~$6.7 million, compared to ~~operating income of $7.2~~$6.4 million in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016. ~~The net~~Operating income for the ~~first~~current quarter benefited by $0.5 million from the reduction in depreciation and amortization expense due to the impairment of Vista long-lived assets in the prior fiscal year third quarter. Net income for the second quarter of 2017 was ~~$5.5~~$4.5 million, or ~~$0.15~~$0.12 per diluted share, compared to net income of ~~$4.9~~$4.2 million, or ~~$0.13~~$0.11 per diluted share, in last year's ~~first~~second quarter. The increase in earnings per share was driven by the improvement in operating income and reduced weighted average shares outstanding. Share repurchase activities over the prior twelve months, which reduced weighted average shares outstanding by 1.6 million shares compared to the second quarter of last year contributed to the increase in earnings per share.

For the six-month period, net sales were $136.0 million compared to $137.8 million, down 1.3% from one year earlier. The Company's operating income was $14.7 million, up 8.1% from the prior year period. Operating income for the six-month period benefited by $0.9 million from the reduction in depreciation and amortization expense due to the impairment of Vista long-lived assets in the prior fiscal year third quarter. Net income for the six-month period of 2017 was $10.0 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, compared to net income of $9.0 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, for the six-month period of 2016. The year-to-date increase in earnings per share was driven by improved operating income, a lower effective tax rate, and reduced weighted shares outstanding for the six-month period ended July 31, 2016 compared to the six-month period ended July 31, 2015.

Net sales for Applied Technology in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2017 were ~~$31.5~~$22.7 million, ~~down 2.9%~~up 11.1% compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016. Sales ~~to the aftermarket channel increased 5.7% compared to the prior year while~~in the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) ~~channel sales decreased 11.9% year-over-year.~~and aftermarket channels were up 12.9% and 9.5%, respectively, for the fiscal 2017 second quarter. Geographically, domestic sales were ~~down 16.3%~~up 11.0% year-over-year and international sales were up ~~26.3%~~11.1% year-over-year. Operating income was ~~$8.7~~$5.2 million, ~~essentially flat~~up 28.0% compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 as~~2016. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by higher sales volume and lower manufacturing costs compared to the ~~impacts from lower sales volumes were virtually offset by the benefits of ongoing expense controls and the prior year restructuring.~~previous year.

~~In February~~Applied Technology's net sales for the six-month period ended July 31, 2016 the Applied Technology Division acquired an interest of approximately 5% in AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (AgEagle). AgEagle is a privately held company that is a leading provider of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) used for agricultural applications. Contemporaneously with the execution of this agreement, AgEagle and the Company entered into a distribution agreement whereby the Company was appointed as the sole and exclusive distributor worldwide of the existing AgEagle system as it pertainswere $54.1 million, up 2.5% compared to the ~~agriculture market. This investment and distribution agreement will allow~~six-month period of fiscal 2016. For the Company to expand into the UAS market for agriculture, enhancing its existing product offerings to provide actionable data that customers can use to make important input decisions. The investment in AgEagle is more fully described in Note 5~~Acquisitions of and Investments in Businesses and Technologies~~six months ended July 31, 2016, sales in the ~~Notes~~aftermarket channel were up 7.0% while sales in the OEM channel were down 1.4%. Geographically, international sales were up 20.8% year-over-year while domestic sales were down 4.4% year-over-year. Operating income for the six-month year-to-date period was $13.9 million, up 8.5% compared to the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~six-month year-to-date period of ~~this Form 10-Q.~~ fiscal 2016.

Engineered Films’ fiscal 2017 ~~first~~second quarter net sales were ~~$29.1~~$36.7 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$2.2~~$0.9 million, or ~~7.1%~~2.4%, compared to the fiscal 2016 ~~first~~second quarter. Volume, measured in pounds sold, increased 9.4% while average selling price declined 6.4% in conjunction with lower resin costs year-over-year and competitive dynamics in certain markets. The ~~decline~~increase in sales was primarily driven by higher sales into the construction and industrial markets. Operating income for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 increased 24.1% to $6.7 million as compared to $5.4 million for the prior year second quarter. This increase in operating income was driven primarily by higher sales volumes, lower raw material costs, and lower operating expenses.

For the six-month period of fiscal 2017, Engineered Films' net sales were $65.8 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 2.0%, compared to the six-month period of fiscal 2016. The decrease in sales was principally driven by lower sales into the energy and

geomembrane markets. Energy markets deteriorated with active U.S. land-based rig counts declining approximately ~~55%~~47% year-over-year. Operating income for the ~~first quarter~~six-month period of fiscal ~~2017 decreased 13.3%~~2016 increased 7.1% to ~~$3.9~~$10.5 million as compared to ~~$4.5~~$9.8 million for the ~~prior year first quarter.~~six-month period of fiscal 2016. The ~~primary driver of the decrease~~year-over-year increase in operating income was driven principally by higher sales volumes, lower ~~production volumes.~~raw material costs, and lower operating expenses.

Net sales for Aerostar in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2017 were ~~$7.9~~$8.4 million, ~~up $1.3~~a decrease of $2.9 million, or 25.7%, compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016. ~~This increase~~The decline in sales was driven ~~primarily~~principally by ~~growth~~the timing of aerostat contracts with the U.S. government, which resulted in ~~stratospheric balloon business.~~a $2.9 million decline in sales of aerostats year-over-year. Operating loss in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2017 was ~~$0.6~~($0.3) million compared to an operating ~~loss~~income of ~~$0.9~~$1.3 million in the ~~first~~second quarter of last year. ~~Benefits from~~This decline in operating income was heavily influenced by this significant reduction in aerostat sales year-over-year as well as the ~~restructuring actions taken~~deferral of pre-contract costs in the ~~fourth quarter~~three-month period ended July 31, 2015 related to certain international Vista pursuits.

Aerostar net sales for the six-month period of ~~last year, together with improved sales volumes, principally led~~fiscal 2017 were $16.3 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 8.8%, compared to the ~~reduction~~six-month period of fiscal 2016. Operating loss for the six-month period of fiscal 2017 was ($0.4) million compared to operating income of $0.5 million in ~~operating loss year-over-year.~~the six-month period of fiscal 2016.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - SEGMENT ANALYSIS

Applied Technology

Applied Technology designs, manufactures, sells, and services innovative precision agriculture products and information management tools that help growers reduce costs, precisely control inputs, and improve yields for the global agriculture market.

Applied Technology’s operations include operations of SBG Innovatie BV and its affiliate, Navtronics BVBA (collectively, SBG) based in the Netherlands.


	Three Months Ended											Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			$ Change			% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change		% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change		% Change
Net sales	$	31,456		$	32,410		$	(954	)	(2.9	)%	$	22,668		$	20,411		$	2,257	11.1	%	$	54,124		$	52,821		$	1,303	2.5	%
Gross profit	13,147			13,251			(104		)	(0.8	)%	9,128			7,507			1,621		21.6	%	22,275			20,758			1,517		7.3	%
Gross margin	41.8		%	40.9		%						40.3		%	36.8		%					41.2		%	39.3		%
Operating expenses	$	4,454		$	4,510		$	(56	)	(1.2	)%	$	3,956		$	3,466		$	490	14.1	%	$	8,410		$	7,976		$	434	5.4	%
Operating expenses as % of sales	14.2		%	13.9		%						17.5		%	17.0		%					15.5		%	15.1		%
Operating income	$	8,693		$	8,741		$	(48	)	(0.5	)%	$	5,172		$	4,041		$	1,131	28.0	%	$	13,865		$	12,782		$	1,083	8.5	%
Operating margin	27.6		%	27.0		%						22.8		%	19.8		%					25.6		%	24.2		%

The following factors were the primary drivers of the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month year-over-year changes:

Market conditions. C~~onditions~~Conditions in the agriculture market ~~appear to be stabilizing, but the~~remain uncertain, and underlying market strength has been subdued keeping pressure on Applied Technology through the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2017. In both the OEM and aftermarket sales channels demand remained ~~challenging. In~~challenging and second quarter sales growth was primarily the ~~aftermarket sales channel, new~~result of market share gains rather than overall growth of the market. New product introductions and ~~enhanced sales force effectiveness led to increased sales~~expanded relationships with OEM partners are driving market share gains versus the prior year.

Sales volume. ~~First~~Second quarter fiscal 2017 net sales ~~decreased 2.9%~~increased 11.1% to ~~$31.5~~$22.7 million compared to ~~$32.4~~$20.4 million in the prior year ~~first~~second quarter. ~~Sales~~For the second quarter, sales in the aftermarket and OEM channels were up 9.5% and 12.9%, respectively. Year-to-date sales increased 2.5% to $54.1 million compared to $52.8 million in the prior year. For the six-month period ended July 31, 2016, sales in the OEM channel were down 1.4% while sales in the aftermarket channel were up ~~5.7%, while OEM sales were down 11.9%.~~7.0% compared to the six-month period ended July 31, 2015.

International sales. For the three-month period, international sales totaled ~~$11.2~~$6.1 million, up ~~26.3%~~11.1% from the prior year comparative period. International sales represented ~~35.7% of segment revenue compared to 27.4%~~26.8% of segment revenue in both the current three month period and the prior comparative period. Year-to-date, international sales totaled $17.3 million, an increase of $3.0 million from a year ago. Year-to-date international sales represented 32.0% of segment sales compared to 27.1% in the comparable prior year period. Higher sales in Europe and Canada were the main drivers of the ~~increase.~~increase in both the three- and six- month periods. The sales increases in Europe reflect commercial synergies realized by the acquisition of SBG in fiscal 2015 as Applied Technology products are increasingly sold into this market.

Gross margin. Gross margin increased to ~~41.8%~~40.3% for the three months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 from ~~40.9%~~36.8% for the three months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2015. ~~Lower~~Fiscal 2017 first-half gross margin increased to 41.2% from 39.3% in the comparative period in fiscal 2016. Both periods benefited from higher sales volumes and lower manufacturing costs.

Restructuring expenses. Fiscal 2016 first half results included severance and other restructuring-related charges totaling $0.6 million. These costs ~~contributed to~~were offset by the ~~higher margin.~~exit of the St. Louis contract manufacturing activities in fiscal 2016 second quarter. There were no impairments recorded as a result of the exit of these activities and gains of $0.2 million and $0.6 million were recorded in the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015, respectively. Land, buildings, building improvements, and machinery and equipment associated with this business have been held for sale since July 31, 2015. These assets were sold in July 2016 and a gain of $0.2 million was recorded on the sale of this idle St. Louis facility during the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2016.

Operating expenses. Fiscal 2017 ~~first~~second quarter operating expense as a percentage of net sales was ~~14.2%~~17.5%, up slightly from ~~13.9%~~17.0% in the prior year ~~first~~second quarter. ~~Lower~~Year-to-date operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was 15.5% compared to 15.1% for fiscal 2016. Higher selling ~~expense, the result of prior year restructuring actions in the fiscal 2016 first quarter, were not enough to offset lower sales volumes~~ and ~~increased~~ research and development (R&D) ~~spending.~~spending led to the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of sales.

Engineered Films

Engineered Films manufactures high performance plastic films and sheeting for energy, agricultural, construction, geomembrane, and industrial applications.


	Three Months Ended											Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			$ Change			% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change			% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change			% Change
Net sales	$	29,100		$	31,321		$	(2,221	)	(7.1	)%	$	36,656		$	35,789		$	867		2.4	%	$	65,756		$	67,110		$	(1,354	)	(2.0	)%
Gross profit	5,384			6,278			(894		)	(14.2	)%	8,239			7,283			956			13.1	%	13,623			13,561			62			0.5	%
Gross margin	18.5		%	20.0		%						22.5		%	20.3		%						20.7		%	20.2		%
Operating expenses	$	1,506		$	1,807		$	(301	)	(16.7	)%	$	1,580		$	1,918		$	(338	)	(17.6	)%	$	3,086		$	3,725		$	(639	)	(17.2	)%
Operating expenses as % of sales	5.2		%	5.8		%						4.3		%	5.4		%						4.7		%	5.6		%
Operating income	$	3,878		$	4,471		$	(593	)	(13.3	)%	$	6,659		$	5,365		$	1,294		24.1	%	$	10,537		$	9,836		$	701		7.1	%
Operating margin	13.3		%	14.3		%						18.2		%	15.0		%						16.0		%	14.7		%

The following factors were the primary drivers of the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month year-over-year changes:

Market conditions. Challenging end-market conditions have persisted in the energy market for Engineered Films. Declines in oil prices resulted in a decrease of approximately ~~55%~~47% in land-based U.S. rig counts ~~in first quarter fiscal 2017 compared to the prior year first quarter.~~year-over-year. The sustained decline resulted in decreasing demand for films in the energy market and increased competition in the related geomembrane market.

Sales volume and selling prices. ~~First~~Second quarter net sales were ~~down 7.1%~~up 2.4% to ~~$29.1~~$36.7 million compared to prior year ~~first~~second quarter net sales of ~~$31.3~~$35.8 million. Higher construction and industrial market sales primarily drove the improvement, increasing $2.7 million in aggregate. This increase was offset somewhat by volume declines in the agricultural, energy, and geomembrane markets. First half fiscal 2017 net sales were down $1.4 million, or 2.0%, to $65.8 million compared to $67.1 million first half fiscal 2016 net sales. The decline in sales in the six-month period was driven primarily by ~~sharp declines,~~a decline of approximately ~~61%,~~35% in the energy ~~market sales.~~market. These declines were partially offset by ~~29.3%~~28.4% sales growth in the industrial market. Sales volume, as measured by pounds sold, for the fiscal 2017 six-month period was up 5.7% and average selling prices for the ~~fiscal first quarter~~same period were ~~each~~ down approximately 4%7.3% compared to the prior year period.

Gross margin. For the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2017~~three- and six-month periods, gross margin was ~~18.5% which was down 1.5 percentage points from the 20.0%~~22.5% and 20.7%, respectively. The gross margin infor the ~~first quarter~~three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015 was 20.3% and 20.2%, respectively. These improvements reflect the impact of ~~fiscal 2016 driven principally by lower production volumes~~value engineering, favorable raw material cost comparisons, and ~~spending on new production lines.~~pricing discipline.

Operating expenses. ~~First~~Second quarter operating expense was down $0.3 million, or ~~16.7%~~17.6%, ~~due~~compared to ~~continued focus on cost containment and benefits from~~ the prior year ~~restructuring actions.~~second quarter. As a percentage of net sales, operating expense was ~~5.2%~~4.3% in the current three-month period as compared to ~~5.8%~~5.4% in the prior year comparative period. Year-to-date operating expenses were 4.7% as a percentage of sales as compared to 5.6% in the prior year comparative period. Expense reductions in both periods were due to continued focus on cost containment.

Aerostar

Aerostar serves the defense/aerospace and situational awareness markets. Aerostar had also provided significant contract manufacturing services in the past, but largely exited this business in fiscal 2016. Aerostar designs and manufactures proprietary

products including stratospheric balloons, tethered aerostats, and radar processing systems for aerospace and situational awareness markets. These products can be integrated with additional third-party sensors to provide research, communications, and situational awareness capabilities to governmental and commercial customers. Through its Vista Research, Inc. (Vista) operations and a separate venture that is majority-owned by the Company, Aerostar pursues potential product and support services contracts for agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. and foreign governments.


	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			$ Change		% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change			% Change		July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			$ Change			% Change
Net sales	$	7,895		$	6,554		$	1,341	20.5	%	$	8,415		$	11,328		$	(2,913	)	(25.7	)%	$	16,310		$	17,882		$	(1,572	)	(8.8	)%
Gross profit	1,150			771			379		49.2	%	1,548			3,043			(1,495		)	(49.1	)%	3,139			3,814			(675		)	(17.7	)%
Gross margin	14.6		%	11.8		%					18.4		%	26.9		%						19.2		%	21.3		%
Operating expenses	$	1,771		$	1,624		$	147	9.1	%	$	1,799		$	1,729		$	70		4.0	%	$	3,568		$	3,353		$	215		6.4	%
Operating expenses as % of sales	22.4		%	24.8		%					21.4		%	15.3		%						21.9		%	18.8		%
Operating (loss) income	$	(621	)	$	(853	)	$	232	(27.2	)%	$	(251	)	1,314			(1,565		)	(119.1	)%	$	(429	)	$	461		$	(890	)	(193.1	)%
Operating margin	(7.9		)%	(13.0		)%					(3.0		)%	11.6		%						(2.6		)%	2.6		%

The following factors were the primary drivers of the ~~three-month~~ year-over-year ~~changes:~~changes for the three- and six-month periods:

Market conditions. Aerostar’s growth strategy emphasizes proprietary products and its focus is on proprietary technology including stratospheric balloons, advanced radar systems, and sales of aerostats in international markets. Certain of Aerostar's markets are subject to significant variability due to government spending. ~~Uncertain demand in these markets continues in fiscal 2017.~~ Aerostar continues to pursue substantial targeted international opportunities but the conflicts plaguing the Middle East North Africa region makes these opportunities and their timing less certain. Aerostar is pioneering new markets with leading-edge applications of its high-altitude balloons and remains in active collaboration with Google on Project Loon.

Sales volumes. ~~Fiscal 2017 first quarter net~~Net sales decreased 25.7% from $11.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2015 to $8.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2016. Year-to-date sales were ~~$7.9~~$16.3 million, ~~up 20.5% from $6.6~~down $1.6 million ~~compared to~~year-over-year, or 8.8%. The decline was driven principally by the ~~prior year first quarter. The increase was primarily~~timing of aerostat contracts with the ~~result~~U.S. government, which resulted in sales of aerostats declining $2.9 million and $2.7 million in the three- and six-month periods, respectively. However, these declines were partially offset by higher sales of stratospheric ~~balloons. These sales were led by~~balloons including Project Loon ~~but~~sales. Aerostar also generated sales from two new U.S. government customers, validating alternative uses of stratospheric balloons.

Gross margin. For the ~~three-month period,~~three- and six-month periods, gross margin ~~increased 2.8~~decreased 8.5 percentage points and 2.1 percentage points, respectively, compared to the prior year ~~first~~period. The reduction in aerostat sales relative to the prior year primarily drove the margin decline. The gross margin for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 benefited from improvement in gross profit of $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, from the reduction in depreciation and amortization expense due to $3.8 million of long-lived asset impairment charges recorded for Vista in the prior fiscal year third quarter.

Operating expenses. ~~First~~Second quarter operating expense was $1.8 million, or ~~22.4%~~21.4% of net sales, ~~a decrease~~an increase from ~~24.8%~~15.3% of net sales in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016. ~~The decrease~~Year-to-date operating expense as a percentage of net sales was ~~a result of the restructuring action taken~~21.9%, up from 18.8% in the ~~fourth quarter~~prior year. The 6.1 percentage point and the 3.1 percentage point increases for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 compared to the prior year periods primarily reflect the decrease in sales. Further, operating expenses for the three- and six-month periods ended July 31, 2015 included the deferral of ~~fiscal 2016 together with higher sales volumes.~~$1.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of pre-contract costs related to certain international Vista pursuits.

Corporate Expenses (administrative expenses; other (expense), net; and income taxes)


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	April 30, 2016			April 30, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Administrative expenses	$	4,338		$	5,204		$	4,884		$	4,316		$	9,222		$	9,520
Administrative expenses as a % of sales	6.3		%	7.4		%	7.2		%	6.4		%	6.8		%	6.9		%
Other (expense), net	$	(97	)	$	(44	)	$	(209	)	$	(266	)	$	(306	)	$	(310	)
Effective tax rate	26.4		%	32.2		%	30.7		%	31.5		%	30.7		%	31.9		%

Administrative spending for the ~~three-month periods ended April 30, 2016~~second quarter of fiscal 2017 was up $0.6 million compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2016. This increase is primarily due to higher accruals of management incentives and long-term incentive awards relative to the prior

year. Prior year expense benefited from the reversal of long-term incentive compensation accruals. Administrative spending for the six-month period was down ~~$0.9~~$0.3 million as compared to the fiscal 2016 comparable period. This decrease reflects the Company's continued emphasis on cost control measures and the benefits of the prior year restructuring actions.

Other income (expense), net consists primarily of activity related to the Company's equity investments, interest income and expense, and foreign currency transaction gains or losses.

The Company's year-to-date effective tax rate for the six months ended July 31, 2016 decreased from 31.9% to ~~26.4% compared to 32.2% in the prior year.~~30.7%. The decrease in the effective tax rate iswas primarily due to the inclusion of an ~~estimate of the fiscal 2017~~ R&D tax credit ~~resulting from~~in the current period provision for income taxes. Congress ~~enacting~~permanently enacted this credit into law ~~permanently~~ in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. No estimate of the R&D tax credit was included in the provision for income taxes ~~at April 30,~~for the three- or six-month periods ended July 31, 2015. ~~$268 of discrete tax benefits were also recorded in the current fiscal year.~~

OUTLOOK

~~At Raven our enduring success is built on our ability to balance the Company’s purpose and core values with necessary shifts in business strategy demanded by an ever-changing world.~~

For Applied Technology, market share is being increased through technological advancements. Sustained funding of key R&D projects over the ~~precision agricultural market remains subdued but appears to be stabilizing. With steady market conditions,~~last few years resulted in two significant new product introductions over the last 18 months. These new products are ~~gaining traction~~generating favorable customer feedback and ~~showing early success in growing market share position. The enhanced quality of Applied Technology’s product portfolio~~strong demand. This demand is expected to continue ~~to improve OEM sales both domestically and internationally. Through~~in the second half of fiscal 2017 ~~Applied Technology~~and into fiscal 2018. With corn prices persistently low and the forecast for lower agricultural equipment sales through the rest of fiscal 2017, the U.S. agricultural market will ~~continue to expand OEM relationships and grow share in a down market and drive for growth by leveraging the new product portfolio and investing intently to drive international sales.~~remain challenging.

For Engineered Films, the ~~decline in oil prices~~energy and ~~drilling activities continues~~geomembrane markets remain challenging although they have stabilized considerably. It is expected these markets will return to negatively impact the energy market and the Company is expecting this to continue throughout fiscal 2017. Engineered Films is working to capitalize on its production capabilities to expand market sharegrowth in the ~~other markets. Sales in~~second half of the ~~construction and industrial markets were strong in~~year. The Company expects volumes to grow similar to the first ~~quarter~~half of fiscal 2017, but lower resin costs will pressure average selling prices and ~~management is focused~~offset growth in volume. The division continues to focus on ~~building on this momentum~~expense controls and ~~making meaningful progress during the year toward returning Engineered Films to growth. Engineered Films is focused on ramping up sales~~value engineering activities as well as driving growth in the industrial ~~market, leveraging its new production line, and driving strong performances in the agricultural~~ and construction ~~markets to increase sales volumes.~~markets.

For Aerostar, the ~~second half~~focus is on building the pipeline of opportunities and converting these opportunities to sales backlog to improve the profitability of the ~~year~~division. At the same time, Aerostar will continue to scrutinize expenses and focus on operational discipline. The pipeline includes opportunities to grow across many of our platforms including stratospheric balloons, Vista radar systems, and aerostats. Delays in contract awards will push-out the turn-around of the division to fiscal 2018.

Despite continued market weakness, the Company is making progress on a number of different fronts and is in a stronger position today than at the ~~seasonally-stronger half~~beginning of the year. Applied Technology and Engineered Films both achieved growth in the second quarter. As a result, for ~~proprietary products and~~the full fiscal year, the Company expects ~~momentum~~ to build throughout the year, but uncertainties remain. The pipeline of new business opportunities has improved significantly with the number of radar-related proposals increasing significantly versus the prior year. Aerostar must continue progress made towards improved financial performance. To sustain this progress, the division must establish a regular cadence of new business wins across product platforms. Resources are aligned to continue the progress, but Aerostar must be successful in turning these opportunities into revenue in order to achieve our expectations.

In addition to each division’s sales initiatives, the Company will remain vigilant on costs, drive down inventory levels, and generate additional value engineering benefits. Driving growth when end-market conditions are weak, while maintaining operational discipline, is the Company’s focus for the rest of the year. Given the performance in the first quarter, the Company is on track to deliver revenues and operating profit consistent withexceed prior year ~~revenue~~consolidated sales and prior year adjusted operating ~~profit with the potential to achieve modest growth in both for the full year.~~income.

Adjusted operating profit is a non-GAAP measure. On both a segment and consolidated basis, adjusted operating income excludes a goodwill impairment loss, a long-lived impairment loss, and associated financial impacts (pre-contract cost write-off and an acquisition-related contingent consideration benefit) all of which relate to the Vista Research, Inc. business within Aerostar and all of which occurred in the fiscal 2016 third quarter. Such adjusted operating profit relates to fiscal 2016 results and is more fully described in Item 7. Management’s

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's balance sheet continues to reflect significant liquidity and a strong capital base. Management focuses on the current cash balance and operating cash flows in considering liquidity, as operating cash flows have historically been the Company's primary source of liquidity. Management expects that current cash, combined with the generation of positive operating cash flows, will be sufficient to fund the Company's normal operating, investing, and financing activities.

The ~~Company's cash needs are seasonal, with working capital demands strongest in the first quarter. As a result, the discussion of trends in operating~~Company’s cash flows ~~focuses on the primary drivers of year-over-year variability in working capital.~~were as follows:



	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015
Cash provided by operating activities	$	14,454		$	14,678		$	25,558		$	23,701
Cash used in investing activities	(205		)	(1,398		)	(1,640		)	(5,831		)
Cash used in financing activities	(6,871		)	(13,456		)	(17,668		)	(22,500		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(45		)	26			91			(17		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	7,333		$	(150	)	$	6,341		$	(4,647	)

Cash and cash equivalents totaled ~~$32.8~~$40.1 million at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$1.0~~$6.3 million from $33.8 million at January 31, 2016. The comparable balance one year earlier was ~~$47.5~~$47.3 million. The ~~decrease~~increase from fiscal 2016 year-end was primarily driven by ~~increased~~free cash ~~outflow~~flow generation driven by lower working capital requirements and reduction in capital spending. This was offset by cash outflows for shares repurchased under the authorized $50.0 million share buyback plan. In the ~~current quarter~~first six months of fiscal 2017, the Company repurchased approximately ~~0.4~~0.5 million shares at an average price of ~~$14.93~~$15.91 for a total of ~~$5.7~~$7.7 million.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $7.3 million ~~but this impact~~for the three-month period ended July 31, 2016. The increase in cash was largely ~~offset by free cash flow generation~~ driven by ~~lower~~favorable net working capital ~~requirements~~developments. Cash and ~~reduction in capital spending.~~cash equivalents decreased $7.2 million from the comparable balance one year earlier.

At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 the Company held cash and cash equivalents of ~~$2.6~~$3.7 million ~~and~~ in accounts outside the United States. These balances included undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries we consider to be indefinitely reinvested. If repatriated, undistributed earnings of approximately ~~$3.2~~$3.1 million would be subject to United States federal taxation. This estimated tax liability is approximately $0.5 million net of foreign tax credits. Our liquidity is not materially impacted by the amount held in accounts outside of the United States.

Operating Activities

Operating cash flows result primarily from cash received from customers, which is offset by cash payments for inventories, services, employee compensation, and income taxes. Strong cash flow from operating activities was sustained year-over year. Cash provided by operating activities was $25.6 million for the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared with $23.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016. Increased net income and working capital improvements drove the increase of $1.9 million year-over-year.

The Company's cash needs are seasonal, with working capital demands strongest in the first quarter. As a result, the discussion of trends in operating cash flows focuses on the primary drivers of year-over-year variability in working capital.

Management evaluates working capital levels through the computation of inventory turnover and average days sales outstanding. The inventory turnover ratio is a metric used to evaluate the effectiveness of inventory management, with further consideration given to balancing the disadvantages of excess inventory with the risk of delayed customer deliveries. Average days sales outstanding (DSO) is a measure of the Company's efficiency in enforcing its credit policy and managing credit terms.

Inventory turnover and DSO for the comparative periods were as follows:



	July 31, 2016	July 31, 2015
Inventory turnover (times/year) - trailing 12 months	3.9	4.1
Accounts receivable DSO (in days) - trailing 12 months	55	57

Inventory levels decreased $8.6 million, from $54.1 million at July 31, 2015 to $45.5 million at July 31, 2016, driven by focused inventory reduction actions in the Applied Technology and Engineered Films divisions. The Company's inventory turnover rate decreased from the prior year primarily due to higher average inventory levels at Aerostar and Engineered Films for a substantial part of the 12-month period as the decline in sales outpaced the declines in inventory.

Accounts receivable levels decreased $1.2 million to $38.6 million at July 31, 2016 from $39.9 million at July 31, 2015. The improvement in accounts receivable DSO reflects a decline in the DSO for both our Engineered Films and Applied Technology divisions.

Improvement in the timing of payments to suppliers increased accounts payable $3.1 million to $10.1 million at July 31, 2016 from $7.0 million at July 31, 2015.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities decreased from $5.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016 to $1.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2017. The prior year cash outflows included a higher level of capital expenditures. Capital expenditures totaled $2.2 million and $7.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The fiscal 2016 spending primarily related to Engineered Films capacity expansion. Management anticipates fiscal 2017 capital spending to be approximately $6 million. There are no significant capacity expansions planned for Engineered Films and the other divisions are expected to maintain a disciplined approach to capital spending. In addition, management will evaluate strategic acquisitions that result in expanded capabilities and improved competitive advantages.

Cash provided by the proceeds from the sale of assets in both periods reflects the disposal of assets related to the exit of contract manufacturing by Applied Technology and Aerostar. The cash inflows in fiscal 2017 were primarily from selling the idle manufacturing facility in St. Louis, Missouri. The cash inflows in fiscal 2016 were from selling the Company's St. Louis operations and related assets as well as the idle manufacturing facility in Huron, South Dakota.

Cash outflows for purchases of investments in fiscal 2017 was $0.5 million compared to cash inflows of $0.4 million in fiscal 2016. Current year activity represents equity investments made by the Company while the prior year reflects settlement of a working capital adjustment to a prior year acquisition.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was $17.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to $22.5 million one year ago.

In the fiscal 2016 first quarter, the Company began purchasing common shares as part of the $40.0 million share repurchase plan authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors. In fiscal 2017 first quarter, the Board of Directors authorized a $10.0 million increase, bringing the total authorized under the plan to $50.0 million. The Company repurchased $7.7 million and $10.8 million in shares in the six-month periods ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Dividends per share were flat at 26.0 cents per share. Total cash outflows for dividends declined $0.4 million in the six-month period ended July 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year period due to the decrease in outstanding shares as a result of share repurchases made since the end of the prior year period.

During the six months ended July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, the Company made payments of $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, on acquisition-related contingent liabilities.

During the six months ended July 31, 2015, the Company paid $0.5 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Agreement previously discussed. No borrowing or repayment occurred on the Credit Agreement during the first half of fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016.

Financing cash outflows in the first half of fiscal 2017 and 2016 included employee taxes paid in relation to net settlement of restricted stock units that vested during the year.

Other Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company entered into a credit agreement dated April 15, 2015. This agreement (Credit Agreement), more fully described in Note 9 Financing Arrangements of this Form 10-Q, provides for a syndicated senior revolving credit facility up to $125 million with a maturity date of April 15, 2020. There were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement for any of the fiscal periods covered by this Form 10-Q. Availability under the Credit Agreement for borrowings as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 was $124.5 million. The Company has requested and received the necessary covenant waivers relating to its late filing of financial statement information during fiscal 2017.

Letters of credit (LOCs) totaling ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million issued under a previous line of credit with Wells Fargo ~~Bank, N.A.~~ were outstanding at ~~April 30, 2016.~~July 31, 2015. These LOCs ~~which~~ primarily support self-insured workers' compensation ~~bonding requirements, are being transitioned to~~bonding. All but one LOC has been transferred and issued under the Credit ~~Agreement. As such, LOCs totaling $1.1 million issued under each credit facility were outstanding at April 30,~~Agreement as of July 31, 2016. At July 31, 2016, ~~including~~ $0.5 million of LOCs ~~issued~~were outstanding under the Credit Agreement. ~~Until such time as the transition of the remaining LOCs is complete, any~~One LOC issued by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A was outstanding. Any draws required under ~~the Wells Fargo LOCs~~this $50,000 LOC would be settled with available cash or borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

~~Operating Activities~~

Operating cash flows result primarily from cash received from customers, which is offset by cash payments for inventories, services, employee compensation, and income taxes. Operating cash flows are evaluated based on net working capital. Net working capital is defined as accounts receivable (net) plus inventories less accounts payable. Management evaluates net working capital levels through the computation of average days sales outstanding and inventory turnover. Average days sales outstanding is a measure of the Company's efficiency in enforcing its credit policy and managing credit terms. The inventory turnover ratio is a metric used to evaluate the effectiveness of inventory management, with further consideration given to balancing the disadvantages of excess inventory with the risk of delayed customer deliveries.

Cash provided by operating activities was $11.1 million for the first three months of fiscal 2017 compared with $9.0 million in the first three months of fiscal 2016. This increase is primarily the result of lower net working capital requirements in the three-month period ended April 30, 2016.

Accounts receivable levels have increased from $38.1 million at January 31, 2016 to $41.0 million at April 30, 2016. The trailing 12 months days sales outstanding was 57 days at April 30, 2016 and 55 days at April 30, 2015. This increase reflects the impact of conditions within Engineered Films’ energy market as the end-market strategy continues to impact accounts receivable, extending cash collections and increasing days sales outstanding. This ratio has been stable sequentially versus the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

Inventory levels have increased from $45.9 million at January 31, 2016 to $47.0 million at April 30, 2016. The Company's inventory turnover rate decreased from the prior year (trailing 12-month inventory turn of 3.7X at April 30, 2016 versus 4.5X at

~~April 30, 2015) primarily due to higher average inventory levels at Aerostar and Engineered Films for a substantial part of the 12-month period.~~

~~Investing Activities~~

Cash used in investing activities decreased from $4.4 million in the first three months of fiscal 2016 to $1.4 million in the first three months of fiscal 2017. The prior year cash outflows included a higher level of capital expenditures. Capital expenditures totaled $0.8 million and $5.0 million in the first three months of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The fiscal 2016 spending primarily related to Engineered Films capacity expansion. Management anticipates fiscal 2017 capital spending to be approximately $9 million. There are no significant capacity expansions planned for Engineered Films and the other divisions are expected to maintain a disciplined approach to capital spending. In addition, management will evaluate strategic acquisitions that result in expanded capabilities and improved competitive advantages.

~~Cash outflow for purchases of investments in fiscal 2017 reflect the Company’s investment in AgEagle more fully described in Note 5~~ ~~Acquisitions of and Investments in Businesses and Technologies~~ ~~in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.~~

~~Cash inflow related to business acquisitions in fiscal 2016 relate to the Company receiving a $0.4 million settlement for the working capital adjustment to the Integra purchase price.~~

~~Financing Activities~~

~~Cash used in financing activities was $10.8 million for the three months ended April 30, 2016 compared to $9.0 million one year ago.~~

In the fiscal 2016 first quarter, the Company began purchasing common shares as part of the $40.0 million share repurchase plan authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors. In fiscal 2017 first quarter, the Board of Directors authorized a $10.0 million increase, bringing the total authorized under the plan to $50.0 million. The Company repurchased $5.7 million and $3.0 million in shares in the three-month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. All such share repurchases were paid at April 30, 2016. At April 30, 2015, $0.4 million of such share repurchases were unpaid.

Dividends per share were flat at 13.0 cents per share, while total cash outflows for dividends declined $0.2 million in the three-month period ended April 30, 2016 as compared to the prior year period due to the decrease in outstanding shares as a result of share repurchases made since the end of the prior year period.

~~During the three months ended April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company made payments of $0.1 million and $0.6 million respectively, on acquisition-related contingent liabilities.~~

During the three months ended April 30, 2015, the Company paid $0.5 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Agreement previously discussed. No borrowing or repayment occurred on the Credit Agreement during the first three months of fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016.

~~Financing cash outflows in the first three months of fiscal 2017 and 2016 included employee taxes paid in relation to net settlement of restricted stock units that vested during the year.~~

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Except as described above, there have been no material changes in the Company’s known off-balance sheet debt and other unrecorded obligations since the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of judgment when valuing assets and liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2016.

~~As described~~Long-lived and Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets using fair value measurement techniques if events or changes in ~~those policies,~~circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. For long-lived and intangible assets, the Company ~~recognizes goodwill as~~performs impairment reviews by asset groups. An impairment loss is recognized when the ~~excess cost~~carrying amount of an ~~acquired business over~~asset is below the ~~net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed.~~ estimated undiscounted cash flows used in determining the fair value of the assets.

Management assesses goodwill for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter and between annual tests whenever a triggering event indicates there may be an impairment. When performing goodwill impairment testing, the fair values of reporting units are determined based on valuation techniques using the best available

~~information, primarily discounted cash flow projections. Such valuations are derived from valuation techniques in which one~~ or more ~~significant inputs are not observable (Level 3~~frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired, using fair value ~~measures).~~

measurement techniques. The Company performs impairment reviews of goodwill by reporting unit. At the end of fiscal 2016, the Company determined it had four reporting units: Engineered Films Division; Applied Technology Division; and two separate reporting units in the Aerostar Division, one of which ~~was~~is Vista and one of which ~~was~~is all other Aerostar ~~operations (Aerostar excluding Vista).~~operations.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, management implemented managerial and financial operations and reporting changes within Vista and Aerostar to further integrate ~~the operations of~~ Vista into the Aerostar ~~operations.~~Division. Integration actions included leadership re-alignment, including selling and business development functions; re-deployment of employees across the division; and consolidation of administrative functions, among other actions. Based on the changes made, the Company has consolidated the two separate reporting units within the Aerostar Division into one reporting unit for the purposes of goodwill impairment review. As such, as of April 30, 2016, the Company has three reporting units: Engineered Films Division, Applied Technology Division, and Aerostar Division. The Company determined there was not a change in the long-lived asset groups as a result of the reporting unit changes.

The Company recognizes goodwill as the excess cost of an acquired business over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Management assesses goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter and between annual tests whenever a triggering event indicates there may be an impairment. When performing goodwill impairment testing, the fair values of reporting units are determined based on valuation techniques using the best available information, primarily discounted cash flow projections. Such valuations are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable (Level 3 fair value measures).

Based on the ~~Company’s~~Company's review of ~~each~~the quantitative and qualitative factors associated with the change in reporting unit, it was determined there were no indicators of ~~these three reporting unit’s operating results~~impairment for the ~~three-month period ended April 30, 2016, no triggering events were identified~~Company’s reporting units or asset groups, and as such no further impairment analysis was required under the applicable accounting ~~guidance.~~guidance for the three- or six-month periods ended July 31, 2016.

In fiscal 2016, as a result of changes in market conditions indicating that goodwill and long-lived assets might be impaired, the Company performed a Step 1 impairment analysis on the Engineered Films reporting unit and asset group. This analysis indicated that the estimated fair value of the Engineered Films reporting unit exceeded the net book value by approximately $50 million and that the Step 1 test was passed at July 31, 2015. For the long-lived asset impairment, the undiscounted cash flows for the Engineered Films asset group exceeded carrying value of the long-lived assets by more than $100 million and no Step 2 analysis was deemed to be necessary based on the recoverability of the long-lived assets.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Accounting Standards Adopted

In November 2015 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes" (ASU 2015-17). Currently generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires the deferred taxes for each jurisdiction (or tax-paying component of a jurisdiction) to be presented as a net current asset or liability and net noncurrent asset or liability. This requires a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis based on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which the underlying temporary differences relate, or, in the case of loss or credit carryforwards, based on the period in which the attribute is expected to be realized. To simplify presentation, ASU 2015-17

requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will now only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. The guidance does not change the existing requirement that only permits offsetting within a jurisdiction - that is, companies are still prohibited from offsetting deferred tax liabilities from one jurisdiction against deferred tax assets of another jurisdiction. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 in the fiscal 2017 first quarter using the prospective method. No current deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet. Since the Company adopted the guidance prospectively, the prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

In September 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments" (ASU 2015-16). The amendments in ASU 2015-16 apply to all entities that have reported provisional amounts for items in a business combination for which the accounting is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs and, during the measurement period, have an adjustment to provisional amounts recognized. ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer in a business combination recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. ASU 2015-16 requires that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this update require an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement, or disclose in the notes, the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 when it became effective in the fiscal 2017 first quarter with no impact on its consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently and expands them to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The Company adopted ASU 2015-01when it became effective in fiscal 2017 first quarter using the prospective method. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In addition to the accounting pronouncements adopted and described above, the Company adopted various other accounting pronouncements that became effective in fiscal 2017 first quarter. None of this guidance had a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures for the period.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In January 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) "Clarifying the Definition of a Business" (ASU 2017-01). This update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments provide a screen for determining when a set of assets and processes is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments require further consideration of inputs, substantive processes and outputs to determine whether a transaction is an acquisition of a business. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and are applied on a prospective basis. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

In August 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" (ASU 2016-15). The new guidance clarifies eight cash flow classification issues where current GAAP was either unclear or has no specific guidance. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. All entities may elect to early adopt ASU 2016-15 in any interim period. If an entity early adopts it must adopt all eight of the amendments in the same period and if early adopted in an interim period any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the year. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 will be applied using the modified retrospective transition method for each period presented. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the classification of certain items on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" (ASU 2016-13). Current GAAP generally delays recognition of the full amount of credit losses until the loss is probable of occurring. The amendments in this guidance eliminate the probable initial recognition threshold and, instead, reflect an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. Previously, when credit losses were measured under GAAP, an entity generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring the incurred loss. Under ASU 2016-13 the Company will need to create an economic forecast over the entire contractual life of long-dated financial assets. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities may elect to early adopt ASU 2016-13 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 will be applied using the modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the first reporting period. The Company's trade accounts receivable are in-scope under ASU 2016-13. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

transactions to require recognition of the tax effects resulting from the settlement of stock-based awards as discrete income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period in which they occur. In addition, this guidance requires that all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments, including the excess tax benefits related to the settlement of stock-based awards, be classified as cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The guidance also requires that cash paid ~~by directly withholding~~to taxing authorities on employee behalf for withheld shares ~~for tax withholding purposes~~should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. In addition, the guidance also allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest, consistent with current U.S. GAAP, or account for forfeitures when they occur. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. ASU 2016-09 requires that the various amendments be adopted using different methods. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, results of operations, and disclosures.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company intends that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that these assumptions are correct or that these expectations will be achieved. Assumptions involve important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect results in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to weather conditions and commodity prices, which could affect sales and profitability in some of the Company’s primary markets, such as agriculture, construction, and energy; or changes in competition, raw material availability, technology or relationships with the Company’s largest customers, risks and uncertainties

relating to development of new technologies to satisfy customer requirements, possible development of competitive technologies, ability to scale production of new products without negatively impacting quality and cost, and ability to finance investment and working capital needs for new development projects, any of which could adversely impact any of the Company's product lines, as well as other risks described in the Company's ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016 under Item 1A. The foregoing list is not exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements are made. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.



ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The exposure to market risks pertains mainly to changes in interest rates on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company has no debt outstanding as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016. The Company does not expect operating results or cash flows to be significantly affected by changes in interest rates.

The Company's subsidiaries that operate outside the United States use their local currency as the functional currency. The functional currency is translated into U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using the period-end exchange rates, and average exchange rates for the statement of income. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as cumulative translation adjustments in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" within shareholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recognized in the period incurred and are included in "Other income (expense), net" in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Foreign currency fluctuations had no material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. However, the Company does utilize derivative financial instruments to manage the economic impact of fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates on those transactions that are denominated in currency other than its functional currency, which is the U.S. dollar. Such transactions are principally Canadian dollar-denominated transactions. The use of these financial instruments had no material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.



ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2016. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports ~~that~~ we file or submit under the ~~Securities and~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934 (the Exchange Act)~~ is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures ~~include, without limitation, controls and procedures~~are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our ~~Chief Executive Officer (CEO)~~CEO and ~~Chief Financial Officer (CFO),~~CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

AsBased on their evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, due to the ~~end~~material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting which existed at that date, as described below.

Notwithstanding the existence of the ~~period covered by~~material weaknesses described below, management has concluded that the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this ~~report, management evaluated~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the ~~effectiveness~~periods presented herein in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Material Weaknesses

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company has identified the ~~Company's~~following control deficiencies which existed as of July 31, 2016 which constitute material weaknesses and resulted in ineffective disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~such date.~~that date:

~~Based on their evaluation,~~



●	The Company’s controls relating to the response to the risks of material misstatement were not effectively designed. This material weakness contributed to the following additional material weaknesses.
●	The Company’s controls over the accounting for goodwill and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, were not effectively designed and maintained, specifically, the controls related to the identification of the proper unit of account as well as the development and review of assumptions used in interim and annual impairment tests. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 31, 2015, the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, and the three-month period ended April 30, 2016.
●	The Company’s controls related to the accounting for income taxes were not effectively designed and maintained, specifically the controls to assess that the income tax provision and related tax assets and liabilities are complete and accurate. This control deficiency resulted in adjustments to the income tax provision and related tax asset and liability accounts and related disclosures for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 31, 2015, the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, and the three-month period ended April 30, 2016.
●	The Company’s controls over the existence of inventories were not effectively designed and maintained. Specifically, the controls to monitor that inventory subject to the cycle count program was counted at the frequency levels and accuracy rates required under the Company’s policy, and the controls to verify the existence of inventory held at third-party locations were not effectively designed and maintained.
●	The Company’s controls over the completeness and accuracy of spreadsheets and system-generated reports used in internal control over financial reporting were not effectively designed and maintained.

Additionally, these control deficiencies could result in additional misstatements of account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the ~~CEO~~annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that these control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses.

Management’s Remediation Initiatives

The Company is actively engaged in the planning for, and ~~CFO have concluded~~implementation of, remediation efforts to address the underlying causes of the control deficiencies that gave rise to the material weaknesses. These remediation efforts, summarized below which are in the process of being implemented, are intended to address the identified material weaknesses and to enhance our overall financial control environment.

With the oversight of the Company’s ~~disclosure~~Audit Committee, management is taking steps intended to address the underlying causes of the material weaknesses identified above, primarily through the following remediation activities:

Controls relating to the response to the risks of material misstatement

We have engaged third-party accounting resources to help management plan for remediation of the identified material weaknesses and evaluate and enhance of our risk assessment in our internal controls over financial reporting.

We are establishing an internal audit function and hiring additional accounting and internal audit staff to improve the management of risks to the enterprise.

We have begun adding or redesigning specific controls and procedures ~~were~~to proactively address opportunities to augment and enhance controls identified through this assessment.

Controls over accounting for goodwill and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets

We have begun redesigning our specific procedures and controls associated with the identification of the proper unit of account as well as the development and review of assumptions used in interim and annual impairment tests.

We are developing an enhanced risk assessment evaluation for the reporting unit for which a goodwill impairment analysis is being conducted.

We are redesigning our controls associated with the development of a bottom-up forecast revenue analysis that supports management’s revenue estimates in interim and annual impairment tests. For Vista, this includes contract-based revenue assumptions.

We are redesigning our controls associated with all significant assumptions, model and data used in management's estimates relevant to assessing the valuation of goodwill and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets.

We have engaged third-party valuation experts to evaluate and enhance the processes and procedures we are establishing or enhancing.

Controls over accounting for income taxes

We have begun adding or redesigning specific processes and controls to augment the review of significant or unusual transactions by finance leadership to ensure that the relevant tax accounting implications are identified and considered.

We have engaged third-party tax accounting resources to assist in review and analysis of tax matters associated with significant or unusual transactions.

Our new Director of Taxation has begun re-evaluating our tax models and designing and implementing multiple reconciliations to ensure the Company’s tax provision is properly reconciled and rolled-forward.

Controls over the existence of inventories, specifically controls to monitor that inventory subject to the cycle count program was counted at the frequency levels and accuracy rates required under the Company’s policy, and the controls to verify existence of inventory held at third-party locations

We have begun redesigning and enhancing our cycle count procedure to monitor the completeness and accuracy of cycle count results and establish specific accountability for investigation and analysis of variances.

We have begun redesigning and enhancing controls, including those over the completeness and accuracy of underlying information, to monitor count dates for each item by location. This will be reviewed annually to ensure that each item was counted the appropriate number of times in accordance with the cycle count policy.

We are redesigning and implementing enhanced controls including those over the completeness and accuracy of underlying information to calculate and monitor the historical 12 month rolling accuracy of cycle counts.

We are going to complete a full physical inventory count annually for locations subject to the cycle count program until the completeness and accuracy of the cycle count program has been validated. Also inventory held at third-party locations will be subject to physical inventory counts each quarter until we have completed the transfer of the vast majority of inventory held at third-party locations to Company owned facilities.

Controls over the completeness and accuracy of spreadsheets and system-generated reports used in internal control over financial reporting

We have begun designing a new control or controls for the identification and assessment of the completeness and accuracy of spreadsheets and system-generated reports used within the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

We have begun adding or redesigning controls to require both an evaluation and evidence of that evaluation of the completeness and accuracy of all spreadsheets and system-generated reports used in internal controls over financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements and related footnote disclosures.

We will maintain evidence of a baseline evaluation of completeness and accuracy for every system-generated report determined to be a key report for which it is possible to maintain a baseline test.

We will periodically re-baseline system-generated reports whether they are changed or not in accordance with our redesigned procedures and controls over financial reporting.

We will establish a process for evaluating and documenting the completeness and accuracy of all other spreadsheets and system-generated reports that cannot be baselined, including spreadsheets prepared or reviewed by management.

Although we have begun implementing remediation actions, we have not yet been able to complete remediation of these material weaknesses. These actions are subject to ongoing review by management, as well as oversight by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Although we plan to complete this remediation process as diligently as possible, we cannot, at this time, estimate when such remediation may occur, and our initiatives may not prove successful in remediating the material weaknesses. Management may determine to enhance other existing controls and/or implement additional controls as the implementation progresses. It will take time to determine whether the additional controls we are implementing will be sufficient and functioning as designed to accomplish their intended purpose; accordingly, these material weaknesses may continue for a period of time. While the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and executive management are closely monitoring this implementation, until the remediation efforts discussed herein, including any additional remediation efforts that management identifies as necessary, are complete, tested, and determined to be effective, ~~at a reasonable assurance level as~~we will not be able to conclude that the material weaknesses have been remediated. In addition, we may need to incur incremental costs associated with this remediation, primarily due to the engagement of ~~April 30, 2016~~.external accounting and tax experts to validate and support remediation activities and the implementation and validation of improved accounting and financial reporting procedures.

We are committed to improving our internal control over financial reporting and processes and intend to proactively review and improve our financial reporting controls and procedures incorporating best practices and leveraging external resources to facilitate periodic evaluations of our internal controls over financial reporting. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may take additional measures to address control deficiencies or modify certain of the remediation measures described above.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in ~~the Company’s~~our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings:

The Company is involved as a party in lawsuits, claims, regulatory inquiries, or disputes arising in the normal course of its business. The potential costs and liability of such claims cannot be determined at this time. Management believes that any liability resulting from these ~~claims~~matters will be substantially mitigated by insurance coverage or would be immaterial. Accordingly, management does not believe the ultimate outcome of these matters will be significant to its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors:

The Company’s business is subject to a number of risks, including those identified in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2016, that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity and that could cause our operating results to vary significantly from fiscal period to fiscal period. The risks described in the Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and

uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, also could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and/or liquidity.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:

On November 3, 2014 the Company's Board of Directors (Board) authorized a ~~$40,000~~$40,000,000 stock buyback program. Effective March 21, 2016 the Board authorized an extension and increase of this stock buyback program. An additional ~~$10,000~~$10,000,000 was authorized for share repurchases once the ~~$40,000~~$40,000,000 authorization limit is reached. This authorization remains in place until such time as the authorized spending limit is reached or is revoked by the Board.

The Company made purchases of its own equity securities during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2017 (recorded on trade date basis) as follows:

Period Total number of shares purchased under the plan Weighted average price paid per share (or unit) Total amount purchased including commissions Dollar value of shares (or units) that may be purchased under the plan
February 1 to February 29, 2016 —
$ —
$ —

March 1 to March 31, 2016 245,770
14.63
3,596,413

April 1 to April 30, 2016 136,295
15.45
2,106,435

Total as of and for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016 382,065
$ 14.93
$ 5,702,848
$ 14,959,331



Period	Total number of shares purchased under the plan	Weighted average price paid per share (or unit)		Total amount purchased including commissions		Dollar value of shares (or units) that may be purchased under the plan
May 1 to May 31, 2016	—	$	—	$	—
June 1 to June 30, 2016	102,187	19.57		1,999,990
July 1 to July 31, 2016	—	—		—
Total as of and for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2016	102,187	$	19.57	$	1,999,990	$	12,959,341

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities: None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures: None

Item 5. Other Information: None

Item 6. Exhibits:



Exhibit Number			Description

31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS			XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

	/s/ Steven E. Brazones
	Steven E. Brazones
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~May 27, 2016~~February 8, 2017

~~#29~~#35