UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-8267

EMCOR GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Delaware		11-2125338
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

301 Merritt Seven Norwalk, Connecticut		06851-1092
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(203) 849-7800

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Applicable Only To Corporate Issuers

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on October ~~26, 2015~~24, 2016: ~~62,723,966~~60,646,476 shares.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc.

INDEX



		Page No.
PART I. - Financial Information.
Item 1.	Financial Statements.
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity - nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	1817
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.	3130
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	3231
PART II. - Other Information.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	3231
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	31
Item 6.	Exhibits.	3231

Table of Contents

PART I. – FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30, 2015 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2016 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2015
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	445,400		$	432,056		$	504,558		$	486,831
Accounts receivable, net	1,333,823			1,234,187			1,495,566			1,359,862
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts	128,828			103,201			142,553			117,734
Inventories	47,843			46,854			43,913			37,545
Prepaid expenses and other	59,252			70,305			60,526			64,140
Total current assets	2,015,146			1,886,603			2,247,116			2,066,112
Investments, notes and other long-term receivables	7,146			9,122			8,227			8,359
Property, plant and equipment, net	117,039			122,178			128,290			122,018
Goodwill	834,660			834,102			979,339			843,170
Identifiable intangible assets, net	474,240			502,060			500,056			472,834
Other assets	35,198			34,902			31,925			30,164
Total assets	$	3,483,429		$	3,388,967		$	3,894,953		$	3,542,657
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Borrowings under revolving credit facility	$	—		$	—
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	18,712			19,041			$	19,889		$	17,541
Accounts payable	423,260			460,478			465,362			488,251
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts	389,727			368,555			467,077			429,235
Accrued payroll and benefits	264,788			245,854			304,032			268,033
Other accrued expenses and liabilities	212,743			189,489			190,476			209,361
Total current liabilities	1,309,230			1,283,417			1,446,836			1,412,421
Borrowings under revolving credit facility							125,000			—
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	303,040			316,399			378,388			297,559
Other long-term obligations	356,990			359,764			360,837			352,621
Total liabilities	1,969,260			1,959,580			2,311,061			2,062,601
Equity:
EMCOR Group, Inc. stockholders' equity:
EMCOR Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 63,469,018 and 63,641,070 shares issued, respectively	635			636
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 61,445,905 and 61,727,709 shares issued, respectively							614			617
Capital surplus	214,631			227,885			108,405			130,369
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(81,629		)	(83,197		)	(76,616		)	(76,953		)
Retained earnings	1,386,977			1,280,991			1,560,489			1,432,980
Treasury stock, at cost 659,841 and 659,841 shares, respectively	(10,302		)	(10,302		)
Treasury stock, at cost 659,841 shares							(10,302		)	(10,302		)
Total EMCOR Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity	1,510,312			1,416,013			1,582,590			1,476,711
Noncontrolling interests	3,857			13,374			1,302			3,345
Total equity	1,514,169			1,429,387			1,583,892			1,480,056
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,483,429		$	3,388,967		$	3,894,953		$	3,542,657

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)(Unaudited)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues	$	1,699,128		$	1,566,711		$	4,940,900		$	4,710,169		$	1,923,174		$	1,699,128		$	5,601,560		$	4,940,900
Cost of sales	1,463,726			1,344,482			4,249,042			4,051,496			1,655,130			1,463,726			4,835,667			4,249,042
Gross profit	235,402			222,229			691,858			658,673			268,044			235,402			765,893			691,858
Selling, general and administrative expenses	165,135			159,983			488,117			454,243			181,441			165,135			530,654			488,117
Restructuring expenses	301			398			742			799			539			301			1,271			742
Gain on sale of building	—			11,749			—			11,749
Operating income	69,966			73,597			202,999			215,380			86,064			69,966			233,968			202,999
Interest expense	(2,226		)	(2,397		)	(6,650		)	(6,887		)	(3,479		)	(2,226		)	(8,973		)	(6,650		)
Interest income	157			186			515			641			161			157			518			515
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	67,897			71,386			196,864			209,134			82,746			67,897			225,513			196,864
Income tax provision	25,720			23,998			74,672			75,428			30,783			25,720			82,663			74,672
Income from continuing operations	42,177			47,388			122,192			133,706			51,963			42,177			142,850			122,192
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes	(270		)	(611		)	(739		)	(4,087		)	(406		)	(270		)	(1,584		)	(739		)
Net income including noncontrolling interests	41,907			46,777			121,453			129,619			51,557			41,907			141,266			121,453
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(385		)	(1,753		)	(233		)	(3,421		)	(26		)	(385		)	(7		)	(233		)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc.	$	41,522		$	45,024		$	121,220		$	126,198		$	51,531		$	41,522		$	141,259		$	121,220
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.68		$	1.94		$	1.94		$	0.85		$	0.66		$	2.35		$	1.94
From discontinued operation	(0.00		)	(0.01		)	(0.01		)	(0.06		)	(0.01		)	(0.00		)	(0.03		)	(0.01		)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.67		$	1.93		$	1.88		$	0.84		$	0.66		$	2.32		$	1.93
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.68		$	1.92		$	1.92		$	0.85		$	0.66		$	2.33		$	1.92
From discontinued operation	(0.00		)	(0.01		)	(0.01		)	(0.06		)	(0.01		)	(0.00		)	(0.03		)	(0.01		)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.67		$	1.91		$	1.86		$	0.84		$	0.66		$	2.30		$	1.91

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.08		$	0.08		$	0.24		$	0.24		$	0.08		$	0.08		$	0.24		$	0.24

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)(Unaudited)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Net income including noncontrolling interests	$	41,907		$	46,777		$	121,453		$	129,619		$	51,557		$	41,907		$	141,266		$	121,453
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	110			(312		)	(78		)	(246		)	(255		)	110			(1,056		)	(78		)
Post retirement plans, amortization of actuarial loss included in net income ⁽¹⁾	554			449			1,646			1,345			440			554			1,393			1,646
Other comprehensive income	664			137			1,568			1,099			185			664			337			1,568
Comprehensive income	42,571			46,914			123,021			130,718			51,742			42,571			141,603			123,021
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(385		)	(1,753		)	(233		)	(3,421		)	(26		)	(385		)	(7		)	(233		)
Comprehensive income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc.	$	42,186		$	45,161		$	122,788		$	127,297		$	51,716		$	42,186		$	141,596		$	122,788

_________


(1)	Net of tax of $~~0.2~~0.1 million and $~~0.1~~0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, and net of tax of ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)(Unaudited)


	Nine months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Cash flows - operating activities:
Net income including noncontrolling interests	$	121,453		$	129,619		$	141,266		$	121,453
Depreciation and amortization	26,806			27,211			29,117			26,806
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets	28,391			28,497			30,678			28,391
Provision for doubtful accounts							3,962			2,364
Deferred income taxes	(3,598		)	4,434			(830		)	(3,598		)
Loss on sale of subsidiary	—			608
Gain on sale of building	—			(11,749		)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	(1,306		)	(5,886		)	(2,062		)	(1,306		)
Equity income from unconsolidated entities	(1,634		)	(1,349		)	(719		)	(1,634		)
Other non-cash items	9,701			8,005			6,844			7,349
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	3,316			1,640			863			3,316
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of businesses acquired	(87,548		)	(72,036		)	(80,195		)	(87,560		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	95,581			108,994			128,924			95,581
Cash flows - investing activities:
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired	(2,357		)	—			(232,883		)	(2,357		)
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary	—			1,108
Proceeds from sale of building	—			11,885
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	2,921			3,138			1,850			2,921
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(22,862		)	(27,574		)	(29,306		)	(22,862		)
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities and joint ventures	—			(1,865		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(22,298		)	(13,308		)	(260,339		)	(22,298		)
Cash flows - financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt	(13,136		)	(13,074		)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility							220,000			—
Repayments of revolving credit facility							(95,000		)	—
Borrowings from long-term debt							400,000			—
Repayments of long-term debt and debt issuance costs							(317,987		)	(13,136		)
Repayments of capital lease obligations	(2,190		)	(1,272		)	(1,144		)	(2,190		)
Dividends paid to stockholders	(15,078		)	(16,109		)	(14,598		)	(15,078		)
Repurchase of common stock	(21,148		)	(76,395		)	(34,805		)	(21,148		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	2,378			5,044			508			2,378
Payments to satisfy minimum tax withholding	(3,866		)	(1,481		)	(4,166		)	(3,866		)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	3,147			2,677			3,583			3,147
Payments for contingent consideration arrangements	(403		)	—			—			(403		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(9,750		)	(2,750		)	(2,050		)	(9,750		)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	1,306			5,886			—			1,306
Net cash used in financing activities	(58,740		)	(97,474		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							154,341			(58,740		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(1,199		)	(579		)	(5,199		)	(1,199		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	13,344			(2,367		)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents							17,727			13,344
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	432,056			439,813			486,831			432,056
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	445,400		$	437,446		$	504,558		$	445,400
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	5,539		$	5,606		$	7,920		$	5,539
Income taxes	$	72,277		$	60,276		$	98,176		$	72,277
Non-cash financing activities:
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations	$	1,686		$	93		$	1,738		$	1,686

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(In thousands)(Unaudited)


				EMCOR Group, Inc. Stockholders																					EMCOR Group, Inc. Stockholders
	Total			Common stock			Capital surplus			Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ⁽¹⁾			Retained earnings			Treasury stock			Noncontrolling interests			Total			Common stock			Capital surplus			Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ⁽¹⁾			Retained earnings			Treasury stock			Noncontrolling interests
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	1,479,626		$	676		$	408,083		$	(65,777	)	$	1,133,873		$	(10,590	)	$	13,361
Balance, December 31, 2014																						$	1,429,387		$	636		$	227,885		$	(83,197	)	$	1,280,991		$	(10,302	)	$	13,374
Net income including noncontrolling interests	129,619			—			—			—			126,198			—			3,421			121,453			—			—			—			121,220			—			233
Other comprehensive income	1,099			—			—			1,099			—			—			—			1,568			—			—			1,568			—			—			—
Common stock issued under share-based compensation plans ⁽²⁾	11,286			6			10,992			—			—			288			—			3,619			4			3,615			—			—			—			—
Tax withholding for common stock issued under share-based compensation plans	(1,481		)	—			(1,481		)	—			—			—			—			(3,866		)	—			(3,866		)	—			—			—			—
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan	2,677			—			2,677			—			—			—			—			3,147			—			3,147			—			—			—			—
Common stock dividends	(16,109		)	—			200			—			(16,309		)	—			—			(15,078		)	—			156			—			(15,234		)	—			—
Repurchase of common stock	(84,565		)	(20		)	(84,545		)	—			—			—			—			(22,972		)	(5		)	(22,967		)	—			—			—			—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(2,750		)	—			—			—			—			—			(2,750		)	(9,750		)	—			—			—			—			—			(9,750		)
Share-based compensation expense	6,321			—			6,321			—			—			—			—			6,661			—			6,661			—			—			—			—
Balance, September 30, 2014	$	1,525,723		$	662		$	342,247		$	(64,678	)	$	1,243,762		$	(10,302	)	$	14,032
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	1,429,387		$	636		$	227,885		$	(83,197	)	$	1,280,991		$	(10,302	)	$	13,374
Balance, September 30, 2015																						$	1,514,169		$	635		$	214,631		$	(81,629	)	$	1,386,977		$	(10,302	)	$	3,857
Balance, December 31, 2015																						$	1,480,056		$	617		$	130,369		$	(76,953	)	$	1,432,980		$	(10,302	)	$	3,345
Net income including noncontrolling interests	121,453			—			—			—			121,220			—			233			141,266			—			—			—			141,259			—			7
Other comprehensive income	1,568			—			—			1,568			—			—			—			337			—			—			337			—			—			—
Common stock issued under share-based compensation plans ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾	3,619			4			3,615			—			—			—			—			1,492			3			498			—			991			—			—
Tax withholding for common stock issued under share-based compensation plans	(3,866		)	—			(3,866		)	—			—			—			—			(4,166		)	—			(4,166		)	—			—			—			—
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan	3,147			—			3,147			—			—			—			—			3,583			—			3,583			—			—			—			—
Common stock dividends	(15,078		)	—			156			—			(15,234		)	—			—			(14,598		)	—			143			—			(14,741		)	—			—
Repurchase of common stock	(22,972		)	(5		)	(22,967		)	—			—			—			—			(29,028		)	(6		)	(29,022		)	—			—			—			—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(9,750		)	—			—			—			—			—			(9,750		)	(2,050		)	—			—			—			—			—			(2,050		)
Share-based compensation expense	6,661			—			6,661			—			—			—			—			7,000			—			7,000			—			—			—			—
Balance, September 30, 2015	$	1,514,169		$	635		$	214,631		$	(81,629	)	$	1,386,977		$	(10,302	)	$	3,857
Balance, September 30, 2016																						$	1,583,892		$	614		$	108,405		$	(76,616	)	$	1,560,489		$	(10,302	)	$	1,302


(1)	Represents cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and post retirement liability adjustments.


(2)	Includes the tax benefit associated with share-based compensation of $1.2 million ~~and~~ ~~$6.2 million~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 ~~and~~.


(3)	Includes a ~~2014~~$1.0 million~~, respectively.~~ adjustment to retained earnings to recognize net operating loss carryforwards attributable to excess tax benefits on stock compensation upon the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Consequently, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. References to the “Company,” “EMCOR,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words refer to EMCOR Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Readers of this report should refer to the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly our financial position and the results of our operations. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

NOTE 2 New Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~September 2015,~~March 2016, we adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) to update guidance on how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. This guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and changes the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows. We adopted these provisions on a prospective basis. In addition, this pronouncement changes guidance on: (a) accounting for forfeitures of share-based awards and (b) employers’ accounting for an employee’s use of shares to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. As a result of the adoption, we recorded an adjustment to retained earnings of $1.0 million to recognize net operating loss carryforwards, net of a valuation allowance, attributable to excess tax benefits on stock compensation that had not been previously recognized to additional paid in capital. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial position and/or results of operations.

In February 2016, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")~~FASB to replace existing lease accounting guidance. This pronouncement is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. Expenses associated with leases will continue to be recognized in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis for each prior reporting period presented. We have not yet determined the effect that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial position and/or results of operations.

On January 1, 2016, we adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. ~~This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early~~The adoption ~~permitted. We intend to adopt~~of this pronouncement ~~on January 1, 2016, and the adoption will~~did not have a material impact on our financial position and/or results of operations.

~~In April 2015, an~~On January 1, 2016, we adopted the accounting pronouncement ~~was~~ issued by the FASB to update the guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs. This guidance requires debt issuance costs, related to a recognized debt liability, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. We adopted this pronouncement on a retrospective basis, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position and/or results of operations.

In November 2015, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes within the balance sheet. This pronouncement eliminates the requirement that deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as current or noncurrent based on the nature of the underlying assets and liabilities. Instead, the pronouncement requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities, including valuation allowances, be classified as noncurrent. This pronouncement is effective ~~retrospectively~~ for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2015,~~2016, with early adoption permitted. We intend to adopt this pronouncement on January 1, ~~2016,~~2017, and the adoption will not have a material impact on our financial position and/or results of operations.

~~On January 1, 2015, we adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB updating existing guidance on discontinued operations. This guidance raises the threshold for a disposal~~

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. This pronouncement is aimed at reducing the frequency of disposals reported as discontinued operations by focusing on strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. We will consider this guidance in conjunction with future disposals, if any.Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 2 New Accounting Pronouncements - (Continued)

In May 2014, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to clarify existing guidance on revenue recognition. This guidance includes the required steps to achieve the core principle that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance permits the use of one of two retrospective transition methods. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect that the adoption of the pronouncement may have on our financial position and/or results of operations.

NOTE 3 Acquisitions of Businesses

On ~~June~~April 15, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Ardent Services, L.L.C. and Rabalais Constructors, LLC (collectively, “Ardent”). This acquisition has been included in our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment. Ardent provides electrical and instrumentation services to the energy infrastructure market in North America, and this acquisition further strengthens our position in electrical construction and services and broadens our capabilities across the industrial and energy sectors, especially in the Gulf Coast, Midwest and Western regions of the United States. Under the terms of the transaction, we acquired 100% of Ardent’s equity interests for total consideration of $201.4 million. In connection with the acquisition of Ardent, we acquired working capital of $36.5 million and other net assets of $3.9 million and have preliminarily ascribed $119.5 million to goodwill and $41.5 million to identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets acquired and represents the future economic benefits expected from this strategic acquisition. We expect that $99.7 million of the acquired goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes. The weighted average amortization period for the identifiable intangible assets is approximately 13.5 years.

On April 1, ~~2015,~~2016, we acquired a company for an immaterial amount. This company provides mobile mechanical services within the Southeastern region of the United States, and its results have been included in our United States building services segment.

On June 1, 2015 and October 13, 2015, we acquired two companies, each for an immaterial amount. These companies primarily ~~provides~~provide mechanical construction services, and ~~has~~their results have been included in our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment.

The purchase price allocations for ~~this acquisition is~~the businesses acquired in 2016 are still preliminary and subject to ~~finalization based on certain contingencies provided for in the purchase agreement.~~change during their respective measurement periods. The acquisition of ~~this business~~these businesses was accounted for by the acquisition method, and the ~~price~~prices paid for ~~the acquired business has~~them have been allocated to ~~its~~their respective assets and liabilities, based upon the estimated fair value of ~~its~~their assets and liabilities at the ~~date~~dates of ~~the acquisition.~~their respective acquisitions.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, there were no reversals of liabilities recorded resulting in non-cash income attributable to contingent consideration arrangements relating to prior acquisitions. During each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we recorded a net reversal of $0.2 million of liabilities resulting in non-cash income attributable to contingent consideration arrangements relating to prior acquisitions.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 4 Disposition of Assets

In January 2014, we sold a subsidiary reported in our United States building services segment. Proceeds from the sale totaled approximately $1.1 million. Included in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was a loss of $0.6 million from this sale, which is classified as a component of "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On July 22, 2014, we sold a building and land owned by one of our subsidiaries reported in the United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment. We recognized a gain of approximately $11.7 million for this transaction in the third quarter of 2014, which has been classified as a "Gain on sale of building" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Due to a historical pattern of losses in the construction operations of our United Kingdom segment and our negative assessment of construction market conditions in the United Kingdom for the foreseeable future, we announced during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 our decision to withdraw from the construction market in the United Kingdom. During the third quarter of 2014, we ceased construction operations in the United Kingdom. The results of the construction operations of our United Kingdom segment for all periods are presented in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as discontinued operations.

The results of discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues	$	149		$	3,166		$	509		$	17,149		$	40		$	149		$	108		$	509
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes	$	(270	)	$	(611	)	$	(739	)	$	(4,087	)	$	(406	)	$	(270	)	$	(1,584	)	$	(739	)
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operation	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 4 Disposition of Assets - (Continued)

Included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 are the following major classes of assets and liabilities associated with the discontinued operation (in thousands):


	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets of discontinued operation:
Current assets	$	3,548	$	6,265	$	1,689	$	2,525
Non-current assets	$	78	$	278

Liabilities of discontinued operation:
Current liabilities	$	6,688	$	10,743	$	3,644	$	4,407
Non-current liabilities	$	31	$	94

At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operation consisted of accounts receivable, contract retentions and contract warranty obligations that are expected to be collected or fulfilled in the ordinary course of business. Additionally at September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, there remained ~~$0.9~~$0.1 million of obligations related to employee severance, ~~and the termination of leased facilities, the majority of~~ which isare expected to be paid in ~~2015.~~2017. The settlement of the remaining assets and liabilities may result in additional income and/or expenses. Such income and/or expenses are expected to be immaterial and will be reflected as ~~an additional component of “Loss from~~ discontinued ~~operation”~~operations as incurred.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 5 Earnings Per Share

Calculation of Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

The following tables summarize our calculation of Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share (“EPS”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands, except share and per share data):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	41,792		$	45,635		$	51,937		$	41,792
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes	(270		)	(611		)	(406		)	(270		)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	41,522		$	45,024		$	51,531		$	41,522
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic earnings (loss) per common share	62,901,923			66,714,641			60,889,484			62,901,923
Effect of dilutive securities—Share-based awards	490,560			702,906			428,573			490,560
Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per common share	63,392,483			67,417,547			61,318,057			63,392,483
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.68		$	0.85		$	0.66
From discontinued operation	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.67		$	0.84		$	0.66
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.68		$	0.85		$	0.66
From discontinued operation	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.66		$	0.67		$	0.84		$	0.66

For the nine months ended September 30,
2015 2014
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 121,959
$ 130,285
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes (739 ) (4,087 )
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 121,220
$ 126,198
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic earnings (loss) per common share 62,921,956
67,062,732
Effect of dilutive securities—Share-based awards 521,071
739,874
Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per common share 63,443,027
67,802,606
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 1.94
$ 1.94
From discontinued operation $ (0.01 ) $ (0.06 )
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 1.93
$ 1.88
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 1.92
$ 1.92
From discontinued operation $ (0.01 ) $ (0.06 )
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders $ 1.91
$ 1.86

~~There were no anti-dilutive awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.~~

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 5 Earnings Per Share - (Continued)



	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	142,843		$	121,959
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes	(1,584		)	(739		)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	141,259		$	121,220
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic earnings (loss) per common share	60,866,532			62,921,956
Effect of dilutive securities—Share-based awards	423,856			521,071
Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per common share	61,290,388			63,443,027
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	2.35		$	1.94
From discontinued operation	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	2.32		$	1.93
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
From continuing operations attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	2.33		$	1.92
From discontinued operation	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. common stockholders	$	2.30		$	1.91

There were no anti-dilutive share-based awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 6 Inventories

Inventories in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):


	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Raw materials and construction materials	$	23,152	$	23,330	$	24,144	$	23,239
Work in process	24,691		23,524		19,769		14,306
	$	47,843	$	46,854	$	43,913	$	37,545

NOTE 7 Debt

Debt in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):


	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Term Loan	$	319,375	$	332,500
Revolving credit facility					$	125,000		$	—
Term loan					400,000			315,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs					(5,734		)	(3,813		)
Capitalized lease obligations	2,331		2,883		3,977			3,869
Other	46		57		34			44
	321,752		335,440		523,277			315,100
Less: current maturities	18,712		19,041		19,889			17,541
	$	303,040	$	316,399	$	503,388		$	297,559

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 7 Debt - (Continued)

Credit Facilities

Until ~~November 25, 2013,~~August 3, 2016, we had a ~~revolving~~ credit agreement (the ~~"2011~~“2013 Credit ~~Agreement"~~Agreement”), as amended, which provided for a revolving credit facility of $750.0 ~~million.~~million (the “2013 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a term loan of $350.0 million (the “2013 Term Loan”). The ~~2011~~2013 Credit Agreement was effective November ~~21, 2011.~~25, 2013. Effective ~~November 25, 2013,~~August 3, 2016, we amended and restated the ~~2011~~2013 Credit Agreement to provide for a $~~750.0~~900.0 million revolving credit facility (the ~~“2013~~“2016 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a ~~$350.0~~$400.0 million term loan (the ~~"Term Loan"~~“2016 Term Loan”) (collectively referred to as the ~~"2013~~“2016 Credit ~~Agreement"~~Agreement”) expiring ~~November 25, 2018.~~August 3, 2021. The proceeds of the 2016 Term Loan were used to repay amounts drawn under the ~~2011~~2013 Term Loan, as well as a portion of the outstanding balance under the 2013 Revolving Credit ~~Agreement.~~Facility. We may increase the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility to $~~1.05~~1.3 billion if additional lenders are identified and/or existing lenders are willing to increase their current commitments. We may allocate up to $~~250.0~~300.0 million of available capacity under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility to letters of credit for our account or for the account of any of our subsidiaries. Obligations under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by most of our direct and indirect subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of our assets and most of the assets of most of our subsidiaries. The ~~2013 Revolving~~2016 Credit ~~Facility and the Term Loan contain~~Agreement contains various covenants providing for, among other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios and certain limitations on payment of dividends, common stock repurchases, investments, acquisitions, indebtedness and capital expenditures. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 with respect to the 2016 Credit Agreement and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015 with respect to the 2013 Credit Agreement. A commitment fee is payable on the average daily unused amount of the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility, which ranges from ~~0.20%~~0.15% to 0.30%, based on certain financial tests. The fee iswas 0.20% of the unused amount as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. Borrowings under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement bear interest at (1) a base rate ~~which is the prime commercial lending rate announced by Bank~~plus a margin of ~~Montreal from time to time (3.25%~~ at ~~September 30, 2015) plus~~ ~~0.25%~~0.00% to 0.75%, based on certain financial tests, or (2) United States dollar LIBOR (~~0.19%~~0.52% at September 30, ~~2015~~2016) plus ~~1.25%~~1.00% to 1.75%, based on certain financial tests. The base rate is determined by the greater of (a) the prime commercial lending rate announced by Bank of Montreal from time to time (3.50% at September 30, 2016), (b) the federal funds effective rate, plus ½ of 1.00%, (c) the daily one month LIBOR rate, plus 1.00%, or (d) 0.00%. The interest rate in effect at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~1.44%~~1.77%. Fees for letters of credit issued under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility range from ~~1.25%~~1.00% to 1.75% of the respective face amounts of outstanding letters of credit and are computed based on certain financial tests. We capitalized ~~approximately~~an additional $3.0 million of debt issuance costs associated with the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement. ~~This amount is being~~Debt issuance costs are amortized over the life of the agreement and isare included as part of interest expense. In connection with the amendment and restatement of the 2013 Credit Agreement, $0.1 million attributable to the acceleration of expense for debt issuance costs in connection with the 2013 Credit Agreement was recorded as part of interest expense during the third quarter of 2016. We are required to make principal payments on the 2016 Term Loan in installments on the last day of March, June, September and December of each year, ~~which commenced~~commencing with the calendar quarter ~~ended March~~ending December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, in the amount of ~~$4.4~~$5.0 million, with a payment of all unpaid principal and interest due on ~~November 25, 2018.~~August 3, 2021. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the balance of the 2016 Term Loan and the 2013 Term Loan was ~~$319.4~~$400.0 million and ~~$332.5~~$315.0 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had approximately $~~95.0~~115.4 million and $~~95.5~~99.0 million of letters of credit outstanding, respectively. There were $125.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility as of September 30, 2016. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2013 Revolving Credit Facility as of ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~and~~ December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 8 Fair Value Measurements

We use a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets, is comprised of the following three levels:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs, other than Level 1 inputs. Level 2 inputs would typically include quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the measurement and unobservable.

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 8 Fair Value Measurements - (Continued)

The following tables provide the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands):


	Assets at Fair Value as of September 30, 2015								Assets at Fair Value as of September 30, 2016
Asset Category	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents ⁽¹⁾	$	445,400	$	—	$	—	$	445,400	$	504,558	$	—	$	—	$	504,558
Restricted cash ⁽²⁾	4,407		—		—		4,407		2,224		—		—		2,224
Deferred compensation plan assets ⁽³⁾	6,698		—		—		6,698		11,701		—		—		11,701
Total	$	456,505	$	—	$	—	$	456,505	$	518,483	$	—	$	—	$	518,483


	Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2014								Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
Asset Category	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents ⁽¹⁾	$	432,056	$	—	$	—	$	432,056	$	486,831	$	—	$	—	$	486,831
Restricted cash ⁽²⁾	6,474		—		—		6,474		4,232		—		—		4,232
Deferred compensation plan assets ⁽³⁾	3,139		—		—		3,139		7,497		—		—		7,497
Total	$	441,669	$	—	$	—	$	441,669	$	498,560	$	—	$	—	$	498,560

________


(1)	Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less, which are Level 1 assets. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had $~~151.7~~157.6 million and $~~156.7~~151.4 million, respectively, in money market funds.


(2)	Restricted cash is classified as “Prepaid expenses and other” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.


(3)	Deferred compensation plan assets are classified as ~~"Other assets"~~“Other assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We believe that the carrying values of our financial instruments, which include accounts receivable and other financing commitments, approximate their fair values due primarily to their short-term maturities and low risk of counterparty default. The carrying value of our debt associated with the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement approximates its fair value due to the variable rate on such debt.

NOTE 9 Income Taxes

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, our income tax provision from continuing operations was $~~25.7~~30.8 million and $~~24.0~~25.7 million, respectively, based on effective income tax rates, before discrete items and less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, of ~~38.0%~~38.1% and ~~37.6%~~38.0%, respectively. The actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations, less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, inclusive of discrete items, were ~~38.1%~~37.2% and ~~34.5%~~38.1%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our income tax provision from continuing operations was ~~$74.7~~$82.7 million and ~~$75.4~~$74.7 million, respectively, based on effective income tax rates, before discrete items and less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, of ~~37.9%~~37.8% and ~~37.6%~~37.9%, respectively. The actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations, less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, inclusive of discrete items, were ~~38.0%~~36.7% and ~~36.6%~~38.0%, respectively. The increase in the 2016 income tax provision was primarily due to increased income from continuing operations. The decrease in the actual income tax ~~provision~~rate on income from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to the reversal of $0.8 million of reserves for uncertain income tax positions. The decrease in the actual income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was primarily due to ~~decreased income before income taxes. The increase in~~$2.1 million of tax benefits recognized upon the ~~actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations was primarily due to changes in discrete items and the mix~~issuance of ~~earnings among various jurisdictions.~~common stock under share-based compensation plans.

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the amount of unrecognized income tax benefits ~~for each period~~ was ~~$5.2~~$3.9 million and $4.8 million (of which $2.2 million and $3.0 million, if recognized, would favorably affect our effective income tax rate)., respectively.

We report interest expense related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the income tax provision. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had approximately $0.4 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits included as a liability in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, less than $0.1 million of interest income was recognized. For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, less than $0.1 million of interest expense was recognized.

1011

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 9 Income Taxes - (Continued)

~~We report interest expense related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the income tax provision. As of~~ ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2014, we had approximately $0.4 million and~~ ~~$0.3 million~~ ~~of accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits included as a liability in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. For each of the three months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~and~~ ~~2014, less than~~ ~~$0.1 million~~ of interest expense was recognized. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, less than $0.1 million of interest expense and less than $0.1 million of interest income was recognized, respectively.

It is reasonably possible that approximately $~~4.1~~3.3 million of unrecognized income tax benefits at September 30, ~~2015~~2016, primarily relating to uncertain tax positions attributable to tax return filing positions, will significantly decrease in the next twelve months as a result of estimated settlements with taxing authorities and the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations.

We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and various state, local and foreign tax agencies. The Company is currently under examination by various taxing authorities for the years 2008 through 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, the Internal Revenue Service finalized its audit of our federal income tax returns for the years 2010 through 2011. We agreed to and paid an assessment, for an immaterial amount, proposed by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to such audit.

NOTE 10 Common Stock

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, there were ~~62,809,177~~60,786,064 and ~~62,981,229~~61,067,868 shares of our common stock outstanding, respectively.

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, ~~66,223~~47,050 and ~~66,126~~66,223 shares of common stock, respectively, were issued primarily upon: (a) the ~~exercise of stock options, (b) the~~ purchase of common stock pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan, (b) the exercise of stock options and (c) the satisfaction of required conditions under certain of our share-based compensation plans. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, 353,116 and 347,713 ~~and 628,850~~ shares of common stock, respectively, were issued primarily upon: (a) the satisfaction of required conditions under certain of our share-based compensation plans, (b) the exercise of stock options and (c) the purchase of common stock pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan.

On September 26, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $100.0 million of our outstanding common stock. On December 5, 2013, ~~and~~ October 23, 2014 ~~our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an additional $100.0 million~~ and $250.0 million of our outstanding common stock, respectively. During 2015, we repurchased approximately 0.5 million shares of our common stock for approximately $23.0 million. Since the inception of the repurchase programs through September 30, 2015, we have repurchased ~~8.1 million~~ ~~shares of our common stock for approximately~~ ~~$306.5 million. As of September 30, 2015, there remained authorization for us to repurchase approximately~~ ~~$143.5 million~~ ~~of our shares. On~~ October 28, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an additional $100.0 million, $250.0 million and $200.0 million of our outstanding common ~~stock.~~stock, respectively. During 2016, we have repurchased approximately 0.6 million shares of our common stock for approximately $29.0 million. Since the inception of the repurchase programs through September 30, 2016, we have repurchased 10.5 million shares of our common stock for approximately $424.9 million. As of September 30, 2016, there remained authorization for us to repurchase approximately $225.1 million of our shares. The repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be suspended, recommenced or discontinued at any time or from time to time without prior notice. ~~Repurchases~~We may ~~be made~~repurchase our shares from time to time to the extent permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements, including provisions in our credit agreement placing limitations on such repurchases. The repurchase programs have been and will be funded from our operations.

NOTE 11 Retirement Plans

Our United Kingdom subsidiary has a defined benefit pension plan covering all eligible employees (the “UK Plan”); however, no individual joining the company after October 31, 2001 may participate in the ~~plan.~~UK Plan. On May 31, 2010, we curtailed the future accrual of benefits for active employees under ~~this~~such plan.

Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost

The components of net periodic pension cost of the UK Plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 were as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Interest cost	$	2,938		$	3,510		$	8,718		$	10,573		$	2,465		$	2,938		$	7,846		$	8,718
Expected return on plan assets	(4,098		)	(4,226		)	(12,159		)	(12,729		)	(3,398		)	(4,098		)	(10,816		)	(12,159		)
Amortization of unrecognized loss	640			508			1,899			1,530			489			640			1,556			1,899
Net periodic pension cost	$	(520	)	$	(208	)	$	(1,542	)	$	(626	)	$	(444	)	$	(520	)	$	(1,414	)	$	(1,542	)

Employer Contributions

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our United Kingdom subsidiary contributed approximately $3.4 million to the UK Plan and anticipates contributing an additional $1.4 million during the remainder of 2016.

1112

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~NOTE 11 Retirement Plans - (Continued)~~

~~Employer Contributions~~

~~For the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015, our United Kingdom subsidiary contributed approximately~~ ~~$4.0 million~~ ~~to its UK Plan. It anticipates contributing an additional~~ ~~$1.6 million~~ ~~during the remainder of 2015.~~

NOTE 12 Commitments and Contingencies

Government Contracts

As a government contractor, we are subject to U.S. government audits and investigations relating to our operations, including claims for fines, penalties and compensatory and treble damages, and possible suspension or debarment from doing business with the government. Based on currently available information, we believe the outcome of ongoing government disputes and investigations will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Legal Matters

One of our subsidiaries was a subcontractor to a mechanical contractor (“Mechanical Contractor”) on a construction project where an explosion ~~occurred.~~occurred in 2010. An investigation of the matter could not determine who was responsible for the explosion. As a result of the explosion, lawsuits have been commenced against various parties, but, to date, no lawsuits have been commenced against our subsidiary with respect to personal injury or damage to property as a consequence of the explosion. However, the Mechanical Contractor has asserted claims, in the context of an arbitration proceeding against our subsidiary, alleging that our subsidiary is responsible for a portion of the damages for which the Mechanical Contractor may be liable as a result of: (a) personal injury suffered by individuals as a result of the explosion and (b) the Mechanical Contractor’s legal fees and associated management costs in defending against any and all such claims. In the most recent filing with the ~~Arbitrator,~~arbitrator, the Mechanical Contractor has stated claims against our subsidiary for alleged violations of the Connecticut and Massachusetts Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Acts in the ongoing arbitration proceeding. Further, the general contractor (as assignee of the Mechanical Contractor) on the construction project, and for whom the Mechanical Contractor worked, has alleged that our subsidiary is responsible for losses asserted by the owner of the project and/or the general contractor because of delays in completion of the project and for damages to the owner’s property. We believe, and have been advised by counsel, that we have a number of meritorious defenses to all such matters. We believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Notwithstanding our assessment of the final impact of this matter, we are not able to estimate with any certainty the amount of loss, if any, which would be associated with an adverse resolution.

One of our subsidiaries, USM, Inc. (“USM”), doing business in California provides, among other things, janitorial services to its customers by having those services performed by independent janitorial companies. USM and one of its customers, which owns retail stores (the “Customer”), are co-defendants in a federal class action lawsuit brought by six employees of USM’s California janitorial subcontractors. The action was commenced on September 5, 2013 in a Superior Court of California and was removed by USM on November 22, 2013 to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The employees allege in their complaint, among other things, that USM and the Customer, during a period that began before our acquisition of USM, violated a California statute that prohibits USM from entering into a contract with a janitorial subcontractor when it knows or should know that the contract does not include funds sufficient to allow the janitorial contractor to comply with all local, state and federal laws or regulations governing the labor or services to be provided. The employees have asserted that the amounts USM pays to its janitorial subcontractors are insufficient to allow those janitorial subcontractors to meet their obligations regarding, among other things, wages due for all hours their employees worked, minimum wages, overtime pay and meal and rest breaks. These employees seek to represent not only themselves, but also all other individuals who provided janitorial services at the Customer’s stores in California during the relevant four year time period. We do not believe USM or the Customer has violated the California statute or that the employees may bring the action as a class action on behalf of other employees of janitorial companies with whom USM subcontracted for the provision of janitorial services to the Customer. However, if the pending lawsuit is certified as a class action and USM is found to have violated the California statute, USM might have to pay significant damages and might be subject to similar lawsuits regarding the provision of janitorial services to its other customers in California. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that USM has violated the California statute, monetary damages, including all unpaid wages and thereon, restitution for unpaid wages, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

On February 17, 2015, USM and its Customer entered into a consent decree which, subject to final approval of the consent decree by the federal judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California following a determination by the Court of the consent decree’s fairness, adequacy and reasonableness,will resolve the claims and defenses asserted in the class action. Under the terms of the consent decree, USM is to (a) pay an aggregate of $1.0 million (i) for monetary relief to the

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~NOTE 12 Commitments and Contingencies - (Continued)~~

members of the class, (ii) for awards to the class representative plaintiffs, (iii) for California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act payments to the State of California for an immaterial amount, and (iv) for all costs of notice and administration of the claims process, (b) pay to counsel for the class an aggregate of $1.3 million, of which $0.2 million is to be allocated for their reimbursable costs and litigation expenses and $1.1 million is to be allocated for attorneys’ fees, and (c) establish procedures to monitor USM’s California subcontractors providing janitorial services to its Customer designed principally to ensure janitorial employees of those subcontractors are paid no less than minimum wage. The settlement amount was accrued for as of December 31, 2014. During 2015, a payment of $1.0 million was made to a third party claims administrator who is holding the funds pending approval by the Court of the consent decree, and the remainder is expected to be paid before the end of 2015.

We are involved in several other proceedings in which damages and claims have been asserted against us. Other potential claims may exist that have not yet been asserted against us. We believe that we have a number of valid defenses to such proceedings and claims and intend to vigorously defend ourselves. We do not believe that any such matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of litigation is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation matters for which reserves have not been established could be decided unfavorably to us, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Restructuring expenses

Restructuring expenses, primarily relating to employee severance obligations, were $0.5 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015. Restructuring expenses for the three months ended September 30,~~ 2015, included $0.3 million of employee severance obligations. Restructuring expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included $0.8 million of employee severance obligations and the reversal of $0.1 million relating to the termination of leased facilities. Restructuring expenses were ~~$0.4 million~~ ~~and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~ respectively. Restructuring expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 included $0.4 million of employee severance obligations. Restructuring expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included $0.6 million of employee severance obligations and $0.2 million relating to the termination of leased facilities. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016, the balance of these restructuring obligations yet to be paid was $0.5 million, the majority of which is expected to be paid during ~~2015.~~2016. No material expenses in connection with restructuring from continuing operations are expected to be incurred during the remainder of ~~2015.~~2016.

The changes in restructuring activity by reportable segments during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~September 30, 2014~~2015 were as follows (in thousands):


	United States electrical construction and facilities services segment			United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment			United States building services segment			Corporate administration			Total			United States electrical construction and facilities services segment			United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment			United States building services segment			Total
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	30		$	164		$	—		$	—		$	194
Charges	375			124			—			300			799
Payments	(405		)	(114		)	—			(300		)	(819		)
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	—		$	174		$	—		$	—		$	174
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	255		$	26		$	—		$	—		$	281		$	255		$	26		$	—		$	281
Charges	(106		)	6			842			—			742			(106		)	6			842			742
Payments	(149		)	(32		)	(384		)	—			(565		)	(149		)	(32		)	(384		)	(565		)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—		$	458		$	—		$	458		$	—		$	—		$	458		$	458
Balance at December 31, 2015																$	—		$	—		$	81		$	81
Charges																—			401			870			1,271
Payments																—			(108		)	(770		)	(878		)
Balance at September 30, 2016																$	—		$	293		$	181		$	474

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~NOTE 12 Commitments and Contingencies - (Continued)~~

~~A summary of restructuring expenses by reportable segments recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was as follows (in thousands):~~

United States
electrical
construction
and facilities
services segment United States
mechanical
construction
and facilities
services segment United States building services segment Corporate administration Total
Severance $ —
$ 6
$ 842
$ —
$ 848
Leased facilities (106 ) —
—
—
(106 )
Total charges $ (106 ) $ 6
$ 842
$ —
$ 742

NOTE 13 Segment Information

We have the following reportable segments which provide services associated with the design, integration, installation, start-up, operation and maintenance of various systems: (a) United States electrical construction and facilities services (involving systems for electrical power transmission and distribution; premises electrical and lighting systems; low-voltage systems, such as fire alarm, security and process control; voice and data communication; roadway and transit lighting; and fiber optic lines); (b) United States mechanical construction and facilities services (involving systems for heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration and clean-room process ventilation; fire protection; plumbing, process and high-purity piping; controls and filtration; water and wastewater treatment; central plant heating and cooling; cranes and rigging; millwrighting; and steel fabrication, erection and welding); (c) United States building services; (d) United States industrial services; and (e) United Kingdom building services. The “United States building services” and ~~"United~~“United Kingdom building ~~services"~~services” segments principally ~~consists~~consist of those operations which provide a portfolio of services needed to support the operation and maintenance of our customers’ facilities, including commercial and government site-based operations and maintenance; facility maintenance and services, including reception, security and catering services; outage services to utilities and industrial plants; military base operations support services; mobile maintenance and services; floor care and janitorial services; landscaping, lot sweeping and snow removal; facilities management; vendor management; call center services; installation and support for building systems; program development, management and maintenance for energy systems; technical consulting and diagnostic services; infrastructure and building projects for federal, state and local governmental agencies and bodies; and small modification and retrofit projects, which services are not generally related to ~~customers'~~customers’ construction programs. The segment ~~"United~~“United States industrial ~~services"~~services” principally consists of those operations which provide industrial maintenance and services, mainly for refineries and petrochemical plants, including on-site repairs, maintenance and service of heat exchangers, towers, vessels and piping; design, manufacturing, repair and hydro blast cleaning of shell and tube heat exchangers and related equipment; refinery turnaround planning and engineering services; specialty welding services; overhaul and maintenance of critical process units in refineries and petrochemical plants; and specialty technical services for refineries and petrochemical plants.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~NOTE 13 Segment Information - (Continued)~~

The following tables present information about industry segments and geographic areas for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Revenues from unrelated entities:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	344,389		$	314,666		$	458,553		$	344,389
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	587,522			565,227			697,733			587,522
United States building services	428,270			427,564			454,800			428,270
United States industrial services	241,946			172,452			239,052			241,946
Total United States operations	1,602,127			1,479,909			1,850,138			1,602,127
United Kingdom building services	97,001			86,802			73,036			97,001
Total worldwide operations	$	1,699,128		$	1,566,711		$	1,923,174		$	1,699,128

Total revenues:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	348,327		$	316,409		$	465,476		$	348,327
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	592,077			569,794			702,464			592,077
United States building services	442,674			438,864			469,191			442,674
United States industrial services	242,335			172,608			239,489			242,335
Less intersegment revenues	(23,286		)	(17,766		)	(26,482		)	(23,286		)
Total United States operations	1,602,127			1,479,909			1,850,138			1,602,127
United Kingdom building services	97,001			86,802			73,036			97,001
Total worldwide operations	$	1,699,128		$	1,566,711		$	1,923,174		$	1,699,128

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 13 Segment Information - (Continued)


	For the nine months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Revenues from unrelated entities:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	1,009,585		$	958,295		$	1,227,474		$	1,009,585
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	1,652,551			1,616,794			1,939,518			1,652,551
United States building services	1,303,389			1,293,750			1,353,248			1,303,389
United States industrial services	699,839			581,642			830,064			699,839
Total United States operations	4,665,364			4,450,481			5,350,304			4,665,364
United Kingdom building services	275,536			259,688			251,256			275,536
Total worldwide operations	$	4,940,900		$	4,710,169		$	5,601,560		$	4,940,900

Total revenues:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	1,016,013		$	971,361		$	1,249,681		$	1,016,013
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	1,663,259			1,632,511			1,950,814			1,663,259
United States building services	1,341,392			1,324,816			1,393,636			1,341,392
United States industrial services	701,226			582,426			831,111			701,226
Less intersegment revenues	(56,526		)	(60,633		)	(74,938		)	(56,526		)
Total United States operations	4,665,364			4,450,481			5,350,304			4,665,364
United Kingdom building services	275,536			259,688			251,256			275,536
Total worldwide operations	$	4,940,900		$	4,710,169		$	5,601,560		$	4,940,900



	For the three months ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	30,927		$	25,528
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	39,447			26,926
United States building services	22,568			16,027
United States industrial services	14,586			14,340
Total United States operations	107,528			82,821
United Kingdom building services	2,591			3,358
Corporate administration	(23,516		)	(15,912		)
Restructuring expenses	(539		)	(301		)
Total worldwide operations	86,064			69,966
Other corporate items:
Interest expense	(3,479		)	(2,226		)
Interest income	161			157
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	82,746		$	67,897

Table of Contents

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~NOTE 13 Segment Information - (Continued)~~

For the three months ended September 30,
2015 2014
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services $ 25,528
$ 20,666
United States mechanical construction and facilities services 26,926
30,206
United States building services 16,027
19,388
United States industrial services 14,340
7,385
Total United States operations 82,821
77,645
United Kingdom building services 3,358
3,082
Corporate administration (15,912 ) (18,481 )
Restructuring expenses (301 ) (398 )
Gain on sale of building —
11,749
Total worldwide operations 69,966
73,597
Other corporate items:
Interest expense (2,226 ) (2,397 )
Interest income 157
186
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $ 67,897
$ 71,386

For the nine months ended September 30,
2015 2014
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services $ 67,479
$ 67,162
United States mechanical construction and facilities services 80,191
78,052
United States building services 54,944
53,606
United States industrial services 44,588
43,155
Total United States operations 247,202
241,975
United Kingdom building services 8,570
12,647
Corporate administration (52,031 ) (50,192 )
Restructuring expenses (742 ) (799 )
Gain on sale of building —
11,749
Total worldwide operations 202,999
215,380
Other corporate items:
Interest expense (6,650 ) (6,887 )
Interest income 515
641
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $ 196,864
$ 209,134

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EMCOR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 13 Segment Information - (Continued)

September 30,
2015 December 31,
2014
Total assets:
United States electrical construction and facilities services $ 352,358
$ 332,150
United States mechanical construction and facilities services 830,456
793,056
United States building services 742,343
737,082
United States industrial services 936,771
954,018
Total United States operations 2,861,928
2,816,306
United Kingdom building services 136,370
130,340
Corporate administration 485,131
442,321
Total worldwide operations $ 3,483,429
$ 3,388,967

~~NOTE 14 Subsequent Event~~

In October 2015, we acquired a company for an immaterial amount. This company provides fire protection services primarily in the Midwestern United States and will be included in our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment.



	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	70,645		$	67,479
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	101,504			80,191
United States building services	54,761			54,944
United States industrial services	66,600			44,588
Total United States operations	293,510			247,202
United Kingdom building services	9,160			8,570
Corporate administration	(67,431		)	(52,031		)
Restructuring expenses	(1,271		)	(742		)
Total worldwide operations	233,968			202,999
Other corporate items:
Interest expense	(8,973		)	(6,650		)
Interest income	518			515
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	225,513		$	196,864



	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Total assets:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	623,446	$	372,525
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	929,994		894,366
United States building services	778,507		721,653
United States industrial services	898,662		883,338
Total United States operations	3,230,609		2,871,882
United Kingdom building services	108,836		133,782
Corporate administration	555,508		536,993
Total worldwide operations	$	3,894,953	$	3,542,657

Table of Contents



ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

We are one of the largest electrical and mechanical construction and facilities services firms in the United States. In addition, we provide a number of building services and industrial services. Our services are provided to a broad range of commercial, industrial, utility and institutional customers through approximately 7075 operating subsidiaries and joint venture entities. Our offices are located in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Impact of Acquisitions

In order to provide a more meaningful period-over-period discussion of our operating results, we may discuss amounts generated or incurred (revenues, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expenses and operating income) from companies acquired. The ~~segment formerly named~~amounts discussed reflect the ~~United Kingdom construction and building services segment has been renamed~~acquired companies’ operating results in the ~~United Kingdom building services segment.~~current reported period only for the time period these entities were not owned by EMCOR in the comparable prior reported period.

Overview

The following table presents selected financial data for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands, except percentages and per share data):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Revenues	$	1,699,128		$	1,566,711		$	1,923,174		$	1,699,128
Revenues increase (decrease) from prior year	8.5		%	(2.4		)%
Restructuring expenses	$	301		$	398
Gain on sale of building	$	—		$	11,749
Revenues increase from prior year							13.2		%	8.5		%
Operating income	$	69,966		$	73,597		$	86,064		$	69,966
Operating income as a percentage of revenues	4.1		%	4.7		%	4.5		%	4.1		%
Net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc.	$	41,522		$	45,024		$	51,531		$	41,522
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	0.66		$	0.68		$	0.85		$	0.66

The results of our operations for the ~~2015~~2016 third quarter set new ~~Company~~company records ~~for a third quarter~~ in terms of revenues, ~~and were~~operating income, net income attributable to EMCOR Group, Inc. and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations for a third quarter. Revenues increased ~~revenues from~~within all of our reportable ~~segments. Overall~~segments, except for our United Kingdom building services segment and our United States industrial services segment. The increase in revenues was attributable to: (a) our domestic construction segments, due to increased activity within the majority of the market sectors in which we operate, and (b) our United States building services segment, primarily due to higher volume within its mobile mechanical services operations. In addition, companies acquired in 2016 and 2015, which are reported in our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment, and our United States building services segment, generated incremental revenues of $90.8 million. The decrease in revenues from our United Kingdom building services segment was due to the effect of unfavorable exchange rates for the British pound versus the United States dollar and a decrease in project activity within the commercial market sector.

Operating income increased within all of our reportable segments, except for our United Kingdom building services segment. Our operating income was favorably impacted by: (a) our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment, primarily attributable to an increase in gross profit from commercial and manufacturing construction projects, and (b) our United States building services segment, predominately as a result of increased gross profit within our mobile mechanical services operations. In addition, companies acquired in 2016 and 2015 generated operating income of $9.1 million, net of $1.4 million of amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets. Corporate administration operating loss increased as a result of: (a) an increase in employment costs, such as incentive compensation, primarily due to higher projected annual operating results than in the same prior year period, and (b) an increase in certain non-income related taxes, (c) an increase in software licensing costs and (d) an increase in legal costs.

Table of Contents

Our operating margin (operating income as a percentage of revenues) ~~decreased in~~for the ~~2015 third quarter~~three months ended September 30, 2016 was 4.5% compared to ~~the 2014 third quarter as the results of our operations in the 2014 third quarter included an $11.7 million gain on the sale of a building. Increases in both operating income and~~ operating margin of 4.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Operating margin increases within our United States building services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and our United States industrial services segment ~~and~~were offset by a decrease in operating margin within our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment were partially offset by decreases in operating income and operating margin within our United States building services segment and our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment.

We completed an acquisition during the first nine months of 2015 for an immaterial amount. The results of the acquired company, which primarily provides mechanical construction services, have been included in our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment; the acquired company expands our service capabilities into new technical areas.

Operating Segments

~~Table of Contents~~

management; call center services; installation and support for building systems; program development, management and maintenance for energy systems; technical consulting and diagnostic services; infrastructure and building projects for federal, state and local governmental agencies and bodies; and small modification and retrofit projects, which services are not generally related to ~~customers'~~customers’ construction programs. The segment ~~"United~~“United States industrial ~~services"~~services” principally consists of those operations which provide industrial maintenance and services, mainly for refineries and petrochemical plants, including on-site repairs, maintenance and service of heat exchangers, towers, vessels and piping; design, manufacturing, repair and hydro blast cleaning of shell and tube heat exchangers and related equipment; refinery turnaround planning and engineering services; specialty welding services; overhaul and maintenance of critical process units in refineries and petrochemical plants; and specialty technical services for refineries and petrochemical plants.

Results of Operations

Revenues

The following tables present our operating segment revenues from unrelated entities and their respective percentages of total revenues (in thousands, except for percentages):


	For the three months ended September 30,								For the three months ended September 30,
	2015		% of Total		2014		% of Total		2016		% of Total		2015		% of Total
Revenues:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	344,389	20	%	$	314,666	20	%	$	458,553	24	%	$	344,389	20	%
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	587,522		35	%	565,227		36	%	697,733		36	%	587,522		35	%
United States building services	428,270		25	%	427,564		27	%	454,800		24	%	428,270		25	%
United States industrial services	241,946		14	%	172,452		11	%	239,052		12	%	241,946		14	%
Total United States operations	1,602,127		94	%	1,479,909		94	%	1,850,138		96	%	1,602,127		94	%
United Kingdom building services	97,001		6	%	86,802		6	%	73,036		4	%	97,001		6	%
Total worldwide operations	$	1,699,128	100	%	$	1,566,711	100	%	$	1,923,174	100	%	$	1,699,128	100	%

Table of Contents


	For the nine months ended September 30,								For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015		% of Total		2014		% of Total		2016		% of Total		2015		% of Total
Revenues:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	1,009,585	20	%	$	958,295	20	%	$	1,227,474	22	%	$	1,009,585	20	%
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	1,652,551		33	%	1,616,794		34	%	1,939,518		35	%	1,652,551		33	%
United States building services	1,303,389		26	%	1,293,750		27	%	1,353,248		24	%	1,303,389		26	%
United States industrial services	699,839		14	%	581,642		12	%	830,064		15	%	699,839		14	%
Total United States operations	4,665,364		94	%	4,450,481		94	%	5,350,304		96	%	4,665,364		94	%
United Kingdom building services	275,536		6	%	259,688		6	%	251,256		4	%	275,536		6	%
Total worldwide operations	$	4,940,900	100	%	$	4,710,169	100	%	$	5,601,560	100	%	$	4,940,900	100	%

As described below in more detail, our revenues for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased to ~~$1.70~~$1.92 billion compared to ~~$1.57~~$1.70 billion for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, and our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased to ~~$4.94~~$5.60 billion compared to ~~$4.71~~$4.94 billion for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in revenues for both periods was primarily attributable to: (a) increased revenues from both of our domestic construction segments, (b) increased demand for our industrial field services within our United States industrial services segment ~~(b) increased revenues from both of our domestic construction segments~~ and (c) increased revenues from our mobile mechanical services operations within our United States building services segment. ~~Revenues increased~~In addition, companies acquired in 2016 and 2015, which are reported in our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and our United States building services segment, generated incremental revenues of $90.8 million and $179.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 within our United States industrial services segment despite a nationwide strike by union employees of certain major oil refineries that negatively impacted the first half of 2015.~~2016, respectively.

Revenues of our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment were $458.6 million and $1,227.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to revenues of $344.4 million and $1,009.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, ~~respectively, compared to revenues~~respectively. Excluding the acquisition of ~~$314.7 million~~Ardent Services, L.L.C. and ~~$958.3 million for~~Rabalais Constructors, LLC (collectively, “Ardent”), the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The~~ increase in revenues for both periods was primarily attributable to an increase in revenues from commercial ~~manufacturing~~ and ~~healthcare~~transportation construction projects, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from ~~institutional~~healthcare construction projects. ~~In addition,~~Additionally, the increase in revenues ~~of this segment~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was partially attributable to an increase in revenues from ~~transportation projects, mainly within~~hospitality construction contracts. The results for the ~~New York City~~three and ~~Los Angeles markets.~~

~~Table~~nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $58.6 million and $104.0 million, respectively, of ~~Contents~~revenues generated by Ardent.

Our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$587.5~~$697.7 million, a ~~$22.3~~$110.2 million increase compared to revenues of ~~$565.2~~$587.5 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Revenues of this segment for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$1,652.6~~$1,939.5 million, a ~~$35.8~~$287.0 million increase compared to revenues of ~~$1,616.8~~$1,652.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in revenues for ~~the three months ended September 30, 2015~~both periods was primarily attributable to an increase in ~~revenues from manufacturing and commercial construction projects, partially offset by a decline~~activity within the majority of the market sectors in ~~revenues from water and wastewater and healthcare construction projects.~~which we operate. The increase in revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in revenues from commercial and institutional construction projects, partially offset by a decline in revenues from manufacturing and water and wastewater construction projects.The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 included ~~$1.7~~$14.9 million and ~~$1.9~~$43.3 million, respectively, of revenues generated by ~~the company~~companies acquired in 2015.

Revenues of our United States building services segment for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$0.7~~$26.5 million compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, and revenues for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$9.6~~$49.9 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in revenues for both periods was primarily attributable to increased revenues from: (a) our mobile mechanical services operations ~~in part due to significant activity in the northern California~~as a result of greater project, service and ~~New England regions and greater repair service~~controls activities and (b) our energy services ~~operations.~~operations, as a result of an increase in large project activity. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $17.3 million and $32.4 million, respectively, of revenues generated by a company acquired in 2016. These increases ~~for both periods~~ were partially offset by ~~decreased~~a decrease in revenues ~~from: (a)~~from our government site-based services operations as a result of the ~~completion~~loss of ~~twolarge long-term site-based joint venture projects~~certain contracts not renewed pursuant to rebid and (b) our commercial site-based services operations as a result of a decline in add-on project activities. In addition, the increase in revenues of this segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was partially offset by: (a) a decrease in revenues of its snow removal activities, as a result of less snowfall in geographical areas in which many of our contracts are based on a per snow event basis, and (b) a decrease in revenues from supplier management contracts.certain scope reductions within their current contract portfolio.

Revenues of our United States industrial services segment for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015 increased~~2016 decreased by ~~$69.5~~$2.9 million compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, and revenues for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$118.2~~$130.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The decrease in revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was attributable to a decrease in revenues from our shop services operations due to lower demand for new heat exchangers as a result of a curtailment in capital spending by most large integrated oil companies, partially offset by increased demand for our field services offerings. The increase in revenues ~~for both periods was primarily due to large capital and maintenance project activity within our industrial field services operations. Revenues increased~~ for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was due to increased demand for specialty services offerings within our field services operations, including large project activity, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from our shop services operations. In addition, revenues for the nine months

Table of Contents

ended September 30, 2015 ~~within this segment despite~~were negatively impacted by a nationwide strike by union employees of certain major oil refineries ~~that negatively impacted~~which led to the ~~first half~~loss and deferral of ~~2015.~~certain turnaround projects.

Our United Kingdom building services segment revenues were $73.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to revenues of $97.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, ~~compared to~~and revenues ~~of $86.8~~were $251.3 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2014, and~~2016 compared to revenues ~~were~~of $275.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 compared to~~2015. This segment’s revenues ~~of $259.7~~decreased by $13.2 million ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in revenues~~and $24.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was due to an increase in activity in the commercial market, in part due to several new contract awards as well as growth within our existing contract portfolio, partially offset by a decrease of $7.6 million and $24.7 million,2016, respectively, ~~relating~~related to the effect of unfavorable exchange rates for the British pound versus the United States ~~dollar.~~dollar resulting, in part, from the decision by the United Kingdom to exit the European Union. Additionally, the decrease in revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was partially attributable to a decrease in project activity within the commercial market sector.

Backlog

The following table presents our operating segment backlog from unrelated entities and their respective percentages of total backlog (in thousands, except for percentages):


	September 30, 2015		% of Total		December 31, 2014		% of Total		September 30, 2014		% of Total		September 30, 2016		% of Total		December 31, 2015		% of Total		September 30, 2015		% of Total
Backlog:
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	1,163,986	31	%	$	1,176,372	32	%	$	1,116,345	30	%	$	1,154,939	30	%	$	1,145,791	30	%	$	1,163,986	31	%
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	1,653,393		44	%	1,473,018		41	%	1,594,511		43	%	1,841,132		47	%	1,683,501		45	%	1,653,393		44	%
United States building services	725,257		19	%	732,960		20	%	742,461		20	%	699,391		18	%	762,196		20	%	725,257		19	%
United States industrial services	72,691		2	%	101,154		3	%	97,863		3	%	51,200		1	%	54,578		1	%	72,691		2	%
Total United States operations	3,615,327		96	%	3,483,504		96	%	3,551,180		96	%	3,746,662		96	%	3,646,066		97	%	3,615,327		96	%
United Kingdom building services	149,891		4	%	150,084		4	%	144,136		4	%	156,032		4	%	125,097		3	%	149,891		4	%
Total worldwide operations	$	3,765,218	100	%	$	3,633,588	100	%	$	3,695,316	100	%	$	3,902,694	100	%	$	3,771,163	100	%	$	3,765,218	100	%

Our backlog at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$3.77~~$3.90 billion compared to ~~$3.63~~$3.77 billion at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~$3.70~~$3.77 billion at September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in backlog at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to backlog at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in backlog from all of our reportable segments, except for our United States ~~mechanical construction and facilities services segment, partially~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~offset by lower backlog from our other reportable segments. The decrease in backlog from our United Kingdom~~ building services segment ~~at September 30, 2015 compared to its backlog at December 31, 2014 was attributable to the effect of unfavorable exchange rates for the British pound versus the~~and our United States ~~dollar.~~industrial services segment. Backlog increases with awards of new contracts and decreases as we perform work on existing contracts. Backlog is not a term recognized under United States generally accepted accounting principles; however, it is a common measurement used in our industry. We include a project within our backlog at such time as a contract is ~~awarded.~~awarded and agreement on contract terms has been reached. Backlog includes unrecognized revenues to be realized from uncompleted construction contracts plus unrecognized revenues expected to be realized over the remaining term of services contracts. However, we do not include in backlog contracts for which we are paid on a time and material basis and a fixed amount cannot be determined, and if the remaining term of a services contract exceeds 12 months, the unrecognized revenues attributable to such contract included in backlog are limited to only the next 12 months of revenues provided for in the contract award. Our backlog also includes amounts related to services contracts for which a fixed price contract value is not assigned when a reasonable estimate of total revenues can be made from budgeted amounts agreed to with our customer. Our backlog is comprised of: (a) original contract amounts, (b) change orders for which we have received written confirmations from our customers, (c) pending change orders for which we expect to receive confirmations in the ordinary course of business and (d) claim amounts that we have made against customers for which we have determined we have a legal basis under existing contractual arrangements and as to which we consider recovery to be probable. Such claim amounts were immaterial for all periods presented. Our backlog does not include anticipated revenues from unconsolidated joint ventures or variable interest entities and anticipated revenues from pass-through costs on contracts for which we are acting in the capacity of an agent and which are reported on the net basis. We believe our backlog is firm, although many contracts are subject to cancellation at the election of our customers. Historically, cancellations have not had a material adverse effect on us.

Table of Contents

Cost of sales and Gross profit

The following table presents our cost of sales, gross profit (revenues less cost of sales) and gross profit margin (gross profit as a percentage of revenues) (in thousands, except for percentages):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Cost of sales	$	1,463,726		$	1,344,482		$	4,249,042		$	4,051,496		$	1,655,130		$	1,463,726		$	4,835,667		$	4,249,042
Gross profit	$	235,402		$	222,229		$	691,858		$	658,673		$	268,044		$	235,402		$	765,893		$	691,858
Gross profit, as a percentage of revenues	13.9		%	14.2		%	14.0		%	14.0		%	13.9		%	13.9		%	13.7		%	14.0		%

Our gross profit increased by ~~$13.2~~$32.6 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Gross profit increased by ~~$33.2~~$74.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in gross profit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was attributable to ~~improved profitability~~increases in gross profit within all of our reportable segments, except for our United ~~States industrial~~Kingdom building services segment and our United States ~~electrical construction and facilities~~industrial services segment. The increase in gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was attributable to ~~improved profitability~~increases in gross profit within all of our reportable segments, ~~other than~~except for our United Kingdom building services segment. Our gross profit margin was 13.9% and 13.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Gross profit margin was 13.7% and 14.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was negatively impacted by $6.9 million and $17.4 million of losses incurred on a transportation construction project in the Northeastern United States within our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment, resulting in a 0.3% negative impact on the Company’s gross profit margin for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Gross profit margin was 14.2% and 14.0% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2015 declined within all of our reportable segments, other than our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment. The decline in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to: (a) a decrease in the billing rates and related gross profit margins within our industrial shop services operations due to competitive market conditions resulting from decreased demand for new heat exchangers as a result of volatility in crude oil prices that led to a curtailment in capital spending and (b) a decrease in gross profit margin from water and wastewater and healthcare construction projects within the United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment.2016.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

The following table presents our selling, general and administrative expenses and SG&A margin (selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues) (in thousands, except for percentages):


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	165,135		$	159,983		$	488,117		$	454,243		$	181,441		$	165,135		$	530,654		$	488,117
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues	9.7		%	10.2		%	9.9		%	9.6		%	9.4		%	9.7		%	9.5		%	9.9		%

Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$5.2~~$16.3 million to ~~$165.1~~$181.4 million compared to ~~$160.0~~$165.1 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Selling, general and administrative

~~Table of Contents~~

expenses for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$33.9~~$42.5 million to ~~$488.1~~$530.7 million compared to ~~$454.2~~$488.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 9.4% and 9.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 9.7% and 9.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, ~~respectively, compared to 10.2% and 9.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~ respectively. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses ~~for both periods~~ was due to higher employee related costs such as ~~salaries,~~ incentive compensation and ~~medical insurance costs,~~salaries, as well as certain other costs including the provision for doubtful accounts and computer hardware and software expenses, partially offset by a decrease in legal costs. The increase in salaries was attributable to an increase in headcount due to higher anticipated revenues than in the same prior year periods, as well as cost of living adjustments and merit pay increases.non-income related taxes. Increased incentive compensation was principally due to higher projected annual operating results than in the same prior year ~~periods,~~period, which resulted in increased accruals for certain of our incentive compensation plans. The increase in salaries was attributable to an increase in headcount due to higher revenues than in the same prior year period, as well as cost of living adjustments and merit pay increases. Additionally, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $3.8 million of transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Ardent in April 2016, as well as increases in information technology costs and bad debt expense. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $11.0 million and $20.9 million, respectively, of expenses directly related to companies acquired in 2016 and 2015, including amortization expense attributable to identifiable intangible assets of $1.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The decrease in SG&A margin for ~~the three months ended September 30, 2015~~both periods was partially attributable ~~to: (a)~~to an increase in revenues without commensurate increases in our overhead cost structure, including salaries and certain other expenses, and (b) a decrease in legal costs. The increase in SG&A margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was partially attributable to an increase in revenues from our United States industrial services segment which generates relatively higher SG&A margins than our other reportable segments.structure.

Restructuring expenses

Restructuring expenses, primarily relating to employee severance obligations, were $0.5 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Restructuring expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 included $0.3 million of employee severance obligations. Restructuring expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included $0.8 million of employee severance obligations and the reversal of $0.1 million relating to the termination of leased facilities. Restructuring expenses were $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Restructuring expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 included $0.4 million of employee severance obligations. Restructuring expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included $0.6 million of employee severance obligations and $0.2 million relating to the termination of leased facilities. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the balance of these restructuring obligations yet to be paid was $0.5 million, the majority of which is expected to be paid during ~~2015.~~2016. No material expenses in connection with restructuring from continuing operations are expected to be incurred during the remainder of ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Gain on sale~~

Table of ~~building~~Contents

Operating income

The following tables present our operating income (loss) and operating income (loss) as a percentage of segment revenues from unrelated entities (in thousands, except for percentages):


	For the three months ended September 30,										For the three months ended September 30,
	2015			% of Segment Revenues		2014			% of Segment Revenues		2016			% of Segment Revenues		2015			% of Segment Revenues
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	25,528		7.4	%	$	20,666		6.6	%	$	30,927		6.7	%	$	25,528		7.4	%
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	26,926			4.6	%	30,206			5.3	%	39,447			5.7	%	26,926			4.6	%
United States building services	16,027			3.7	%	19,388			4.5	%	22,568			5.0	%	16,027			3.7	%
United States industrial services	14,340			5.9	%	7,385			4.3	%	14,586			6.1	%	14,340			5.9	%
Total United States operations	82,821			5.2	%	77,645			5.2	%	107,528			5.8	%	82,821			5.2	%
United Kingdom building services	3,358			3.5	%	3,082			3.6	%	2,591			3.5	%	3,358			3.5	%
Corporate administration	(15,912		)	—		(18,481		)	—		(23,516		)	—		(15,912		)	—
Restructuring expenses	(301		)	—		(398		)	—		(539		)	—		(301		)	—
Gain on sale of building	—			—		11,749			—
Total worldwide operations	69,966			4.1	%	73,597			4.7	%	86,064			4.5	%	69,966			4.1	%
Other corporate items:
Interest expense	(2,226		)			(2,397		)			(3,479		)			(2,226		)
Interest income	157					186					161					157
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	67,897				$	71,386				$	82,746				$	67,897

~~Table of Contents~~


	For the nine months ended September 30,										For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			% of Segment Revenues		2014			% of Segment Revenues		2016			% of Segment Revenues		2015			% of Segment Revenues
Operating income (loss):
United States electrical construction and facilities services	$	67,479		6.7	%	$	67,162		7.0	%	$	70,645		5.8	%	$	67,479		6.7	%
United States mechanical construction and facilities services	80,191			4.9	%	78,052			4.8	%	101,504			5.2	%	80,191			4.9	%
United States building services	54,944			4.2	%	53,606			4.1	%	54,761			4.0	%	54,944			4.2	%
United States industrial services	44,588			6.4	%	43,155			7.4	%	66,600			8.0	%	44,588			6.4	%
Total United States operations	247,202			5.3	%	241,975			5.4	%	293,510			5.5	%	247,202			5.3	%
United Kingdom building services	8,570			3.1	%	12,647			4.9	%	9,160			3.6	%	8,570			3.1	%
Corporate administration	(52,031		)	—		(50,192		)	—		(67,431		)	—		(52,031		)	—
Restructuring expenses	(742		)	—		(799		)	—		(1,271		)	—		(742		)	—
Gain on sale of building	—			—		11,749			—
Total worldwide operations	202,999			4.1	%	215,380			4.6	%	233,968			4.2	%	202,999			4.1	%
Other corporate items:
Interest expense	(6,650		)			(6,887		)			(8,973		)			(6,650		)
Interest income	515					641					518					515
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	196,864				$	209,134				$	225,513				$	196,864

As described below in more detail, operating income was $86.1 million and $234.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $70.0 million and $203.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, ~~respectively, compared to $73.6 million~~respectively. Operating margin was 4.5% and ~~$215.4 million~~4.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2014, respectively. Operating margin was~~2016, respectively, compared to 4.1% for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 4.7% and 4.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The decreases in operating income and operating margin for three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were attributable to an $11.7 million gain on the sale of a building included within the results of operations for the same prior year periods.2015.

Operating income of our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$25.5~~$30.9 million and ~~$67.5~~$70.6 million, respectively, compared to operating income of ~~$20.7~~$25.5 million and ~~$67.2~~$67.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. The increase in operating income for both periods was ~~due~~primarily attributable to ~~an increase in gross profit from: (a) commercial construction projects, partially due to profits recognized on contracts in~~ the ~~Mid-Atlantic~~acquisition of Ardent, which contributed operating income of $5.7 million and ~~Pacific Northwest regions~~$7.2 million, net of $0.7 million and ~~(b) healthcare construction projects, partially offset by a decrease in gross profit from transportation~~$1.4 million of amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets, for the three and institutional construction projects and an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses due to higher employee related costs such as incentive compensation and salaries. The increase in incentive compensation was principally due to higher projected annual operating results than innine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Additionally, the ~~same prior year period, which resulted in increased accruals for certain of our incentive compensation plans. The~~ increase in operating ~~margin~~income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was partially attributable to an increase in gross profit ~~margin. The decrease~~from commercial and manufacturing construction

Table of Contents

contracts. Operating income was negatively impacted by $6.9 million and $17.4 million of losses incurred on a transportation construction project in the Northeastern United States as a result of productivity issues attributable to unfavorable job-site conditions for which we will seek recovery, resulting in a 1.4% and 1.3% negative impact on the segment’s operating margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 was attributable~~2016, respectively. This project is expected to ~~an increase in~~be completed by the ~~ratio~~end of ~~selling, general and administrative expenses to revenues resulting from an increase in incentive compensation due to higher projected annual operating results than in the same prior year period.~~2016.

Our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$26.9~~$39.4 million, a ~~$3.3~~$12.5 million ~~decrease~~increase compared to operating income of ~~$30.2~~$26.9 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$80.2~~$101.5 million, a ~~$2.1~~$21.3 million increase compared to operating income of ~~$78.1~~$80.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in operating income for ~~the three months ended September 30, 2015~~both periods was attributable to a decline in gross profit from water and wastewater and healthcare construction projects, partially offset by an increase in gross profit from manufacturing construction projects. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was favorably impacted by an increase in gross profit from commercial, manufacturing, healthcare and ~~institutional~~water and wastewater construction ~~projects, partially offset by a decrease in gross profit from healthcare construction projects and an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. The~~projects. Additionally, the results for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014~~2016 included the receipt of ~~$3.0~~$2.0 million from the former ~~shareholders~~owner of a company we had previously acquired as a result of a settlement of a claim by us under the acquisition ~~agreement; this payment was recorded as a reduction~~agreement. Companies acquired in 2015 generated operating income of ~~“Cost~~$1.7 million and $3.0 million, net of ~~sales” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements~~$0.2 million and $0.6 million of Operations. The decrease in operating margin for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was attributable to a decrease in gross profit margin. Operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 remained relatively unchanged at 4.9% compared to 4.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The resultsamortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets, for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 included~~2016, respectively. The increase in operating ~~losses~~margin for the both periods was partially attributable to a decrease in the ratio of ~~less than $0.1 million~~selling, general and ~~$0.2 million, respectively, incurred by a company acquired in 2015.~~administrative expenses to revenues.

~~Table of Contents~~

Operating income of our United States building services segment for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015 decreased~~2016 increased by ~~$3.4~~$6.5 million compared to operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, and its operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 increased~~2016 decreased by ~~$1.3~~$0.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~primarily~~ attributable ~~to: (a) a decrease~~to an increase in gross profit from project, service and controls activities within our ~~government site-based~~mobile mechanical services operations. Additionally, a company acquired during the second quarter of 2016, reported within our mobile mechanical services operations, ~~as a result~~generated operating income of $1.7 million and $2.6 million, net of $0.5 million and $0.9 million of amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets, for the ~~completion of twolarge long-term site-based joint venture projects not renewed pursuant to rebid~~three and ~~(b) an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses such as salaries, and the provision for doubtful accounts.~~nine months ended September 30, 2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~primarily~~ attributable ~~to increased gross profit from:~~to: (a) ~~our mobile mechanical services operations, partially due to increased profitability in projects, retrofits, repair services work and service contracts, and (b)~~lower operating income within our commercial site-based services ~~operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, these increases were~~operations, partially ~~offset by~~as a result of a reduction in snow removal activities due to less snowfall in areas where our contracts are based on a per snow event basis, (b) a decrease in operating income ~~from: (a)~~within our ~~energy~~government site-based services operations ~~as,~~and (c) a decrease in ~~the same prior year period, we benefited from the successful completion of a large project and (b)~~operating income within our ~~government site-based~~energy services operations, as a result of ~~the completion of two~~a loss incurred on a large ~~long-term site-based joint venture projects not renewed pursuant to rebid. The results~~project. In addition, operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included ~~income~~the impact of ~~approximately~~ $2.7 million ~~net~~ of ~~associated legal costs,~~gross profit recognized upon the favorable settlement of a claim by us against the former owner of a company we ~~had~~ previously ~~acquired within our commercial site-based services operations.~~acquired. The ~~decrease~~increase in operating margin for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was attributable to an increase in the ratio of selling, general and administrative expenses to revenues due to an increase in revenues from our mobile mechanical services operations, which generate relatively higher SG&A margins than the other divisions within this segment due to the nature of their overhead cost structure. Operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 remained relatively unchanged at 4.2% compared to 4.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.gross profit margin.

Operating income of our United States industrial services segment for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$7.0~~$0.2 million compared to operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, and its operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$1.4~~$22.0 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in operating income for both periods was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~large capital and maintenance project activity~~an increase in gross profit from specialty services offerings within our ~~industrial~~ field services operations, partially offset by: (a) a decrease in the billing rates and related gross profit margins within our industrial shop services operations due to competitive market conditions resulting from decreased demand for new heat exchangers as a result of volatility in crude oil prices that led to a curtailment in capital spending and (b) an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses due to higher employee related costs such as employee benefits and salaries, partially as a result of increased headcount due to higher field services volume.including large project activity. In addition, ~~the increase in operating income~~this segment’s results for the first nine months ~~ended September 30,~~of 2015 ~~was partially offset~~were negatively impacted by the mix of work in our industrial shop services operations, which included fewer repair projects, than in the same prior year period, that generate relatively high gross profit margins. Operating income increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 within this segment despite the negative impact of a nationwide strike by union employees of certain major oil refineries, which led to the loss and deferral ~~of, or may lead to the potential loss~~ of certain turnaround ~~projects that generate relatively high~~projects. The increase in operating income for both periods was partially offset by a decrease in gross profit ~~margins.~~from our shop services operations due to lower demand for new heat exchangers as a result of a curtailment in capital spending by most large integrated oil companies. The increase in operating margin for ~~the three months ended September 30, 2015~~both periods was attributable to a decrease in the ratio of selling, general and administrative expenses to revenues due to an increase in revenues without commensurate increases in our overhead cost structure, including salaries and certain other expenses. The decrease in operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was attributable to a decrease in gross profit margin.revenues.

Our United Kingdom building services segment operating income was $2.6 million and $9.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to operating income of $3.4 million and $8.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, ~~respectively, compared to operating income of $3.1 million and $12.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~ respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was primary attributable to a decrease of $0.5 million relating to the effect of unfavorable exchange rates for the British pound versus the United States dollar and a decrease in project activity within the commercial market sector. The increase in operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to an increase in gross profit from project activity within the commercial market. The decrease in operating income and operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to the impact of $4.8 million of income recognized in the second quarter of 2014market, partially as a result of ~~a reduction~~several contract awards won in ~~the estimate of certain accrued contract costs that were no longer expected to be incurred. This segment recorded~~2015, offset in part by a decrease ~~in operating income~~ of ~~$0.3~~$0.9 million ~~and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively,~~ relating to the effect of unfavorable exchange rates for the British pound versus the United States dollar. ~~Operating~~The increase in operating margin for the ~~three~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 remained relatively unchanged at 3.5% compared~~2016 was attributable to ~~3.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2014.~~an increase in gross profit margin.

Our corporate administration operating loss for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$15.9~~$23.5 million compared to ~~$18.5~~$15.9 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Our corporate administration operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$52.0~~$67.4 million compared to ~~$50.2~~$52.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014. The decrease in expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in certain expenses, including legal and software licensing costs.~~2015. The increase in expenses for ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2015~~both periods was primarily due toto: (a) an increase in ~~certain~~ employment costs, such as incentive compensation, ~~and salaries, as well as certain other expenses including legal costs. The increase in incentive compensation was partially~~primarily due to higher projected annual operating results than in the same prior year period, ~~which resulted~~(b) an increase in ~~increased accruals for~~ certain ~~of our incentive compensation plans.~~non-income

2423

Table of Contents

related taxes, (c) an increase in software licensing costs and (d) an increase in legal costs. Additionally, operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased as a result of $3.8 million of transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Ardent in April 2016.

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ was ~~$2.2~~$3.5 million and ~~$2.4~~$2.2 million, respectively. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $9.0 million and ~~2014 was~~ $6.7 million, ~~and $6.9 million,~~ respectively.The increase in interest expense for both periods was primarily due to increased outstanding borrowings in 2016 compared to 2015. Interest income for each of the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 was $0.2 million. Interest income for each of the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 was $0.5 ~~million and $0.6 million, respectively.~~million.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our income tax provision from continuing operations was ~~$25.7~~$30.8 million and ~~$24.0~~$25.7 million,, respectively, based on effective income tax rates, before discrete items and less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, of ~~38.0%~~38.1% and ~~37.6%~~38.0%, respectively. The actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations, less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, inclusive of discrete items, were ~~38.1%~~37.2% and ~~34.5%~~38.1%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our income tax provision from continuing operations was ~~$74.7~~$82.7 million and ~~$75.4~~$74.7 million, respectively, based on effective income tax rates, before discrete items and less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, of ~~37.9%~~37.8% and ~~37.6%~~37.9%, respectively. The actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations, less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, inclusive of discrete items, were ~~38.0%~~36.7% and ~~36.6%~~38.0%, respectively. The increase in the 2016 income tax provision was primarily due to increased income from continuing operations. The decrease in the actual income tax ~~provision~~rate on income from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to the reversal of $0.8 million of reserves for uncertain income tax positions. The decrease in the actual income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was primarily due to ~~decreased income before income taxes. The increase in~~$2.1 million of tax benefits recognized upon the ~~actual income tax rates on income from continuing operations was primarily due to changes in discrete items and the mix~~issuance of ~~earnings among various jurisdictions.~~common stock under share-based compensation plans.

Discontinued operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents our net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities (in thousands):


	For the nine months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	95,581		$	108,994		$	128,924		$	95,581
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(22,298	)	$	(13,308	)	$	(260,339	)	$	(22,298	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(58,740	)	$	(97,474	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							$	154,341		$	(58,740	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	$	(1,199	)	$	(579	)	$	(5,199	)	$	(1,199	)

Our consolidated cash balance increased by approximately ~~$13.3~~$17.7 million from ~~$432.1~~$486.8 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 to ~~$445.4~~$504.6 million at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$95.6~~$128.9 million compared to ~~$109.0 million of~~ net cash provided by operating activities of $95.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a ~~$134.3~~$19.8 million increase in net income, a $19.6 million increase in net over-billings related to the timing of customer billings and payments and an $8.9 million decrease in our accounts receivable balances, ~~resulting from an increase in revenues and related billings,~~ partially offset by a ~~$46.6~~$25.9 million increase in ~~our accounts payable balances.~~income taxes paid. Net cash used in investing activities was $260.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $22.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 compared to~~2015. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the increase in payments for acquisitions of ~~$13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~businesses and property, plant and equipment. Net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 decreased~~2016 increased by approximately ~~$38.7~~$213.1 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities was primarily due to borrowings of $220.0 million under our revolving credit facility and a decrease in distributions to noncontrolling interests, partially offset by an increase in funds used for the repurchase of common ~~stock, partially offset by an increase in distributions to noncontrolling interests.~~stock. Cash flows from discontinued operations were immaterial and are not expected to significantly affect future liquidity.

2524

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of material contractual obligations and other commercial commitments (in millions):


			Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years		Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Term Loan (including interest currently at 1.44%)⁽¹⁾	$	332.9	$	22.1	$	43.4	$	267.4	$	—
Revolving credit facility (including interest at 1.77%) ⁽¹⁾											$	135.9	$	2.2	$	4.5	$	129.2	$	—
Term loan (including interest currently at 1.77%)⁽¹⁾											430.8		27.1		53.0		350.7		—
Capital lease obligations	2.4		1.3		0.8		0.3		—		4.2		1.2		2.2		0.8		—
Operating leases	232.1		56.1		82.0		46.4		47.6		271.2		61.5		98.4		60.8		50.5
Open purchase obligations ⁽²⁾	949.1		719.4		219.1		10.6		—		1,011.9		786.2		213.8		11.9		—
Other long-term obligations, including current portion ⁽³⁾	360.6		41.5		307.6		11.5		—		386.4		48.8		327.5		10.1		—
Liabilities related to uncertain income tax positions	5.6		4.5		—		—		1.1
Liabilities related to uncertain income tax positions ⁽⁴⁾											4.4		3.7		—		—		0.7
Total Contractual Obligations	$	1,882.7	$	844.9	$	652.9	$	336.2	$	48.7	$	2,244.8	$	930.7	$	699.4	$	563.5	$	51.2

			Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period										Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
Other Commercial Commitments	Total Committed		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years		Total Committed		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Letters of credit	$	95.2	$	5.3	$	89.9	$	—	$	—	$	115.6	$	2.8	$	112.8	$	—	$	—

_________

(1)

On ~~November 25, 2013,~~August 3, 2016, we entered into a ~~$750.0~~$900.0 million revolving credit facility (the ~~“2013~~“2016 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a ~~$350.0~~$400.0 million term loan (the ~~"Term Loan"~~“2016 Term Loan”), (collectively referred to as the ~~"2013~~“2016 Credit ~~Agreement"~~Agreement”). The proceeds of the 2016 Term Loan were used to repay amounts drawn under our prior credit agreement. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the amount outstanding under the 2016 Term Loan was ~~$319.4~~$400.0 million. As of September 30, 2016, there were borrowings outstanding of $125.0 million under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility.


(2)	Represents open purchase orders for material and subcontracting costs related to construction and services contracts. These purchase orders are not reflected in EMCOR’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and should not impact future cash flows, as amounts should be recovered through customer billings.

(3)

Represents primarily insurance related liabilities and liabilities for deferred income taxes, incentive compensation and deferred compensation, classified as other long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash payments for insurance and deferred compensation related liabilities may be payable beyond three years, but it is not practical to estimate these payments; therefore, these liabilities are reflected in the 1-3 years payment period. We provide funding to our post retirement plans based on at least the minimum funding required by applicable regulations. In determining the minimum required funding, we utilize current actuarial assumptions and exchange rates to forecast estimates of amounts that may be payable for up to five years in the future. In our judgment, minimum funding estimates beyond a five year time horizon cannot be reliably estimated and, therefore, have not been included in the table.


(4)	Includes $0.4 million of accrued interest.

Until ~~November 25, 2013,~~August 3, 2016, we had a ~~revolving~~ credit agreement (the ~~"2011~~“2013 Credit ~~Agreement"~~Agreement”), as amended, which provided for a revolving credit facility of $750.0 ~~million. The 2011 Credit Agreement was effective November 21, 2011. Effective November 25, 2013, we amended and restated the 2011 Credit Agreement to provide for a $750.0~~ million ~~revolving credit facility~~ (the “2013 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a term loan of $350.0 million (the “2013 Term Loan”). The 2013 Credit Agreement was effective November 25, 2013. Effective August 3, 2016, we amended and restated the 2013 Credit Agreement to provide for a $900.0 million revolving credit facility (the “2016 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $400.0 million term loan (the ~~"Term Loan"~~“2016 Term Loan”) (collectively referred to as the ~~"2013~~“2016 Credit ~~Agreement"~~Agreement”) expiring ~~November 25, 2018.~~August 3, 2021. The proceeds of the 2016 Term Loan were used to repay amounts drawn under the ~~2011~~2013 Term Loan, as well as a portion of the outstanding balance under the 2013 Revolving Credit ~~Agreement.~~Facility. We may increase the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility to ~~$1.05~~$1.3 billion if additional lenders are identified and/or existing lenders are willing to increase their current commitments. We may allocate up to ~~$250.0~~$300.0 million of available capacity under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility to letters of credit for our account or for the account of any of our subsidiaries. Obligations under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by most of our direct and indirect subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of our assets and most of the assets of most of our subsidiaries. The ~~2013 Revolving~~2016 Credit ~~Facility and the Term Loan contain~~Agreement contains various covenants providing for, among other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios and certain limitations on payment of dividends, common stock repurchases, investments, acquisitions, indebtedness and capital expenditures. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 with respect to the 2016 Credit Agreement and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015 with respect to the 2013 Credit Agreement. A commitment fee is payable on the average daily unused amount of the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility, which ranges from ~~0.20%~~0.15% to 0.30%, based on certain financial tests. The fee iswas 0.20% of the unused amount as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016. Borrowings under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement bear interest at (1) a base rate ~~which is the prime commercial lending rate announced by Bank~~plus a margin of ~~Montreal from time to time (3.25%~~ at ~~September 30, 2015) plus 0.25%~~0.00% to 0.75%, based on certain financial tests, or (2) United States dollar LIBOR (~~0.19%~~0.52% at September 30, ~~2015~~2016) plus ~~1.25%~~1.00% to 1.75%, based on certain financial tests. The base rate is determined by the greater of (a) the prime commercial lending rate announced by Bank of Montreal from time to time (3.50% at September 30, 2016), (b) the federal funds effective rate, plus ½ of 1.00%, (c) the

Table of Contents

daily one month LIBOR rate, plus 1.00%, or (d) 0.00%. The interest rate in effect at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~1.44%~~1.77%. Fees for letters of credit issued under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility range from ~~1.25%~~1.00% to 1.75% of the respective face amounts of outstanding letters of credit and are computed based on certain financial tests. We capitalized ~~approximately~~an additional $3.0 million of debt issuance costs associated with the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement. ~~This amount is being~~Debt issuance costs are amortized over the life of the agreement and isare included as part of interest expense. In connection with the amendment and restatement of the 2013 Credit Agreement, $0.1 million attributable to the acceleration of expense for debt issuance costs in connection with the 2013 Credit Agreement was recorded as part of interest expense during the third quarter of 2016. We are required to make principal payments on the 2016 Term Loan in installments on the last day of March, June, September and December of each year, ~~which commenced~~commencing with the calendar quarter ~~ended March~~ending December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, in the amount of ~~$4.4~~$5.0 million, with a payment of all unpaid principal and interest due on ~~November 25, 2018.~~August 3, 2021. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31,

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2014,~~ 2015, the balance of the 2016 Term Loan and the 2013 Term Loan was ~~$319.4~~$400.0 million and ~~$332.5~~$315.0 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we had approximately $~~95.0~~115.4 million and $~~95.5~~99.0 million of letters of credit outstanding, respectively. There were $125.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility as of September 30, 2016. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2013 Revolving Credit Facility at ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~and~~ December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

The terms of our construction contracts frequently require that we obtain from surety companies (“Surety Companies”) and provide to our customers payment and performance bonds (“Surety Bonds”) as a condition to the award of such contracts. The Surety Bonds secure our payment and performance obligations under such contracts, and we have agreed to indemnify the Surety Companies for amounts, if any, paid by them in respect of Surety Bonds issued on our behalf. In addition, at the request of labor unions representing certain of our employees, Surety Bonds are sometimes provided to secure obligations for wages and benefits payable to or for such employees. Public sector contracts require Surety Bonds more frequently than private sector contracts, and accordingly, our bonding requirements typically increase as the amount of public sector work increases. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, based on ~~our~~the percentage-of-completion of our projects covered by Surety Bonds, our aggregate estimated exposure, assuming defaults on all our then existing contractual obligations, was approximately ~~$1.2~~$1.1 billion. Surety Bonds are issued by Surety Companies in return for premiums, which vary depending on the size and type of bond.

From time to time, we discuss with our current and other Surety Bond providers the amounts of Surety Bonds that may be available to us based on our financial strength and the absence of any default by us on any Surety Bond issued on our behalf and believe those amounts are currently adequate for our needs. However, if we experience changes in our bonding relationships or if there are adverse changes in the surety industry, we may seek to satisfy certain customer requests for Surety Bonds by posting other forms of collateral in lieu of Surety Bonds such as letters of credit, parent company guarantees or cash, seeking to convince customers to forego the requirement for Surety Bonds, by increasing our activities in our business segments that rarely require Surety Bonds such as our building and industrial services segments, and/or by refraining from bidding for certain projects that require Surety Bonds. There can be no assurance that we would be able to effectuate alternatives to providing Surety Bonds to our customers or to obtain, on favorable terms, sufficient additional work that does not require Surety Bonds. Accordingly, if we were to experience a reduction in the availability of Surety Bonds, we could experience a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.

In the ordinary course of business, we, at times, guarantee obligations of our subsidiaries under certain contracts. Generally, we are liable under such an arrangement only if our subsidiary fails to perform its obligations under the contract. Historically, we have not incurred any substantial liabilities as a consequence of these guarantees.

We do not have any other material financial guarantees or off-balance sheet arrangements other than those disclosed herein.

We are a party to lawsuits and other proceedings in which other parties seek to recover from us amounts ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $10.0 million. We do not believe that any such matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Table of Contents

We have paid quarterly dividends since October 25, 2011. We expect that such quarterly dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future. Prior to October 25, 2011, no cash dividends had been paid on the ~~Company's~~Company’s common stock. We currently pay a regular quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Our ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement places limitations on the payment of dividends on our common stock. However, we do not believe that the terms of such agreement currently materially limit our ability to pay a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share for the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends has been and will be funded from our operations.

Our primary source of liquidity has been, and is expected to continue to be, cash generated by operating activities. We also maintain our ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility that may be utilized, among other things, to meet short-term liquidity needs in the event cash generated by operating activities is insufficient or to enable us to seize opportunities to participate in joint ventures or to make acquisitions that may require access to cash on short notice or for any other reason. ~~However, negative~~Negative macroeconomic trends may have an adverse effect on liquidity. During economic downturns, there have been typically fewer small discretionary projects from the private sector, and our competitors have aggressively bid larger long-term infrastructure and public sector contracts. Short-term liquidity is also impacted by the type and length of construction contracts

~~Table of Contents~~

in place and large turnaround activities in our United States industrial services segment that are billed in arrears pursuant to contractual terms that are standard within the industry. During economic downturns, there have been typically fewer small discretionary projects from the private sector, and our competitors have aggressively bid larger long-term infrastructure and public sector contracts. Performance of long duration contracts typically requires greater amounts of working capital. While we strive to maintain a net over-billed position with our customers, there can be no assurance that a net over-billed position can be maintained. Our net over-billings, defined as the balance sheet accounts “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts” less “Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts”, were $~~260.9~~324.5 million and $~~265.4~~311.5 million as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Long-term liquidity requirements can be expected to be met initially through cash generated from operating activities and our ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility. Based upon our current credit ratings and financial position, we can reasonably expect to be able to incur long-term debt to fund acquisitions. Over the long term, our primary revenue risk factor continues to be the level of demand for non-residential construction services and for building and industrial services, which is influenced by macroeconomic trends including interest rates and governmental economic policy. In addition, our ability to perform work is critical to meeting long-term liquidity requirements.

We believe that our current cash balances and our borrowing capacity available under our ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility or other forms of financing available to us through borrowings, combined with cash expected to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to provide ~~our~~ short-term and foreseeable long-term liquidity and meet our expected capital expenditure requirements.

Certain Insurance Matters

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we utilized approximately ~~$92.4~~$115.0 million and ~~$94.6~~$97.8 million, respectively, of letters of credit obtained under our 2016 Revolving Credit Facility and our 2013 Revolving Credit Facility, respectively, as collateral for our insurance obligations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

We review new accounting standards to determine the expected financial impact, if any, that the adoption of such standards will have. See Part I. Item 1, ~~"Financial~~“Financial Statements – Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2, New Accounting ~~Pronouncements"~~Pronouncements”, for further information regarding new accounting standards, including the anticipated dates of adoption and the effects on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of ~~the~~our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. We believe that some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of accounting policies that affect our financial condition and results of operations are the impact of changes in the estimates and judgments pertaining to: (a) revenue recognition from (i) long-term construction contracts for which the percentage-of-completion method of accounting is used and (ii) services contracts; (b) collectibility or valuation of accounts receivable; (c) insurance liabilities; (d) income taxes; and (e) goodwill and identifiable intangible assets.

Revenue Recognition for Long-term Construction Contracts and Services Contracts

We believe our most critical accounting policy is revenue recognition from long-term construction contracts for which we use the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Percentage-of-completion accounting is the prescribed method of

Table of Contents

accounting for long-term contracts in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605-35, “Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”, and, accordingly, is the method used for revenue recognition within our industry. Percentage-of-completion is measured principally by the percentage of costs incurred to date for each contract to the estimated total costs for such contract at completion. Certain of our electrical contracting business units measure percentage-of-completion by the percentage of labor costs incurred to date for each contract to the estimated total labor costs for such contract. Pre-contract costs from our construction projects are generally expensed as incurred. Application of percentage-of-completion accounting results in the recognition of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets arise when revenues have been recognized but the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of contracts. Such amounts are recoverable from customers upon various measures of performance, including achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion of a contract.

~~Table of Contents~~

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts also include amounts we seek or will seek to collect from customers or others for errors or changes in contract specifications or design, contract change orders in dispute or unapproved as to both scope and price or other customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract costs (claims and unapproved change orders). Such amounts are recorded at estimated net realizable value and take into account factors that may affect our ability to bill and ultimately collect unbilled revenues. The profit associated with claim amounts is not recognized until the claim has been settled and payment has been received. We did not recognize any material amounts associated with claim settlements during the periods presented. Due to uncertainties inherent in estimates employed in applying percentage-of-completion accounting, estimates may be revised as project work progresses. Application of percentage-of-completion accounting requires that the impact of revised estimates be reported prospectively in the condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition to revenue recognition for long-term construction contracts, we recognize revenues from the performance of services for maintenance, repair and retrofit work consistent with the performance of services, which are generally on a pro-rata basis over the life of the contractual arrangement. Expenses related to all services arrangements are recognized as incurred. Revenues related to the engineering, manufacturing and repairing of shell and tube heat exchangers are recognized when the product is shipped and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Costs related to this work are included in inventory until the product is shipped. Provisions for the entirety of estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred $6.9 million and $17.4 million, respectively, of losses on a transportation project within our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment as a result of productivity issues attributable to unfavorable job-site conditions. There were no other significant losses recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~2015.

Accounts Receivable

We are required to estimate the collectibility of accounts receivable. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the likelihood of realization of receivables. Relevant assessment factors include the creditworthiness of the customer, our prior collection history with the customer and related aging of the past due balances. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, our accounts receivable of $~~1,333.8~~1,495.6 million and $~~1,234.2~~1,359.9 million, respectively, included allowances for doubtful accounts of $~~11.5~~15.3 million and $~~10.4~~11.2 million, respectively. The increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~the~~an increase in our provision for doubtful accounts, ~~primarily within our United States building services segment and our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment.~~partially offset by the write-off of previously reserved for accounts receivable. Specific accounts receivable are evaluated when we believe a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial condition or its credit ratings. The allowance for doubtful accounts requirements are based on the best facts available and are re-evaluated and adjusted on a regular basis as additional information is received.

Insurance Liabilities

We have loss payment deductibles for certain workers’ compensation, automobile liability, general liability and property claims, have self-insured retentions for certain other casualty claims and are self-insured for employee-related healthcare claims. Losses are recorded based upon estimates of our liability for claims incurred and for claims incurred but not reported. The liabilities are derived from known facts, historical trends and industry averages utilizing the assistance of an actuary to determine the best estimate for the majority of these obligations. We believe the liabilities recognized on our balance sheets for these obligations are adequate. However, such obligations are difficult to assess and estimate due to numerous factors, including severity of injury, determination of liability in proportion to other parties, timely reporting of occurrences and effectiveness of safety and risk management programs. Therefore, if our actual experience differs from the assumptions and estimates used for recording the liabilities, adjustments may be required and will be recorded in the period that the experience becomes known. Our estimated insurance liabilities for ~~workers'~~workers’ compensation, automobile liability, general liability and property claims increased by ~~$5.5~~$8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015, primarily due to higher revenues, including the impact of acquired companies. If our estimated insurance liabilities for ~~workers'~~workers’ compensation, automobile liability, general liability and property claims had increased by 10%, it would have resulted in ~~$14.1~~$15.3 million of additional expense for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

Table of Contents

Income Taxes

We had net deferred income tax liabilities at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 of ~~$125.4~~$129.8 million and ~~$127.8~~$120.6 million, respectively, primarily resulting from differences between the carrying value and income tax basis of certain identifiable intangible assets and depreciable fixed assets, which will impact our taxable income in future periods. Included within these net deferred income tax liabilities are deferred income tax assets. A valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred income tax asset will not be realized. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the total valuation allowance on deferred income tax assets, ~~for each period,~~ related ~~solely~~ to state net operating carryforwards, was approximately ~~$2.0 million.~~$1.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016, we had $~~834.7~~979.3 million and $~~474.2~~500.1 million, respectively, of goodwill and net identifiable intangible assets (primarily consisting of our contract backlog, developed technology/vendor network, customer relationships, non-competition agreements and trade names), primarily arising out of the acquisition of companies. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, goodwill and net identifiable intangible assets were $~~834.1~~843.2 million and $~~502.1~~472.8 million, respectively. The changes to goodwill since December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were related to the acquisition of two companies in 2016 and a ~~company during~~purchase price adjustment related to an acquisition made in 2015. The determination of related estimated useful lives for identifiable intangible assets and whether those assets are impaired involves significant judgments based upon short and long-term projections of future performance. These forecasts reflect assumptions regarding the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies, as well as macroeconomic conditions. ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”) requires goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives not be amortized, but instead ~~must be~~ tested at least annually for impairment (which we test each October 1, absent any impairment indicators), and be written down if impaired. ASC 350 requires that goodwill be allocated to its respective reporting unit and that identifiable intangible assets with finite lives be amortized over their useful lives.

We test for impairment of our goodwill at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 13, ~~"Segment Information"~~“Segment Information”, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. In assessing whether our goodwill is impaired, we utilize the two-step process as prescribed by ASC 350. The first step of this test compares the fair value of the reporting unit, determined based upon discounted estimated future cash flows, to the carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no further ~~work~~analysis is required and no impairment loss is recognized. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and step two of the goodwill impairment test would need to be performed to measure the amount of an impairment loss, if any. In the second step, the impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss in the amount of the excess is recognized and charged to operations. No impairment of our goodwill was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

As of September 30, 2016, we had $979.3 million of goodwill on our balance sheet and, of this amount, 39.3% relates to our United States industrial services segment, 25.0% relates to our United States building services segment, 23.1% relates to our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and 12.6% relates to our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment. As of the date of our latest impairment test, October 1, 2015, the carrying values of our United States industrial services segment, our United States building services segment, our United States mechanical construction and ~~2014.~~facilities services segment and our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment were approximately $725.5 million, $445.1 million, $249.5 million and $62.9 million, respectively. The fair values of our United States industrial services segment, our United States building services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment exceeded their carrying values by approximately $52.5 million, $291.2 million, $773.2 million, and $661.7 million, respectively. The weighted average cost of capital used in testing goodwill for impairment was 11.1%, 11.1% and 11.0% for our domestic construction segments, our United states building services segment and our United States industrial services segment, respectively. The perpetual growth rate used was 2.7% for all of our domestic segments.

We also test for the impairment of trade names that are not subject to amortization by calculating the fair value using the “relief from royalty payments” methodology. This approach involves two steps: (a) estimating reasonable royalty rates for each trade name and (b) applying these royalty rates to a net revenue stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine fair value. This fair value is then compared with the carrying value of each trade name. If the carrying amount of the trade name is greater than the implied fair value of the trade name, an impairment in the amount of the excess is recognized and charged to operations. No impairment of our trade names was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~2015.

Table of Contents

In addition, we review for the impairment of other identifiable intangible assets that are being amortized whenever facts and circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be fully recoverable. This test compares their carrying values to the undiscounted pre-tax cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets. If the assets are impaired, the assets are written down to their fair values, generally determined based on their future discounted cash flows. No impairment of our other identifiable intangible assets was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~

~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2015, we had~~ ~~$834.7 million~~ of goodwill on our balance sheet and, of this amount, approximately 46.1% relates to our United States industrial services segment, 27.4% relates to our United States building services segment, approximately 26.1% relates to our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and approximately 0.4% relates to our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment. As of the date of our latest impairment test, October 1, 2014, the carrying values of our United States industrial services segment, our United States building services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment were approximately $748.1 million, $474.3 million, $261.4 million and $60.4 million, respectively. The fair values of our United States industrial services segment, our United States building services segment, our United States mechanical construction and facilities services segment and our United States electrical construction and facilities services segment exceeded their carrying values by approximately $48.7 million, $129.7 million, $598.0 million, and $523.2 million, respectively. The weighted average cost of capital used in testing goodwill for impairment was 12.2%, 12.8% and 11.2% for our domestic construction segments, our United states building services segment and our United States industrial services segment, respectively. The perpetual growth rate used was 2.7% for all of our domestic segments.2015.

We have certain businesses, particularly within our United States industrial services segment, whose results are highly impacted by the demand for some of our offerings within the industrial and oil and gas markets. Future performance of this segment, along with a continued evaluation of the conditions of its end user markets, will be important to ongoing impairment assessments. Should this ~~segment's~~segment’s actual results suffer a decline or expected future results be revised downward, the risk of goodwill impairment or impairment of other identifiable intangible assets would increase.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our development of the present value of future cash flow projections used in impairment testing is based upon assumptions and estimates by management from reviews of our operating results, business plans, anticipated growth rates and margins, and weighted average cost of capital, among others. Those assumptions and estimates can change in future periods, and other factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, such as interest rates. There can be no assurance that estimates and assumptions made for purposes of our goodwill and identifiable asset impairment testing will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding future business performance or anticipated growth rates and/or margins are not achieved, or there is a rise in interest rates, we may be required to record goodwill and/or identifiable asset impairment charges in future periods.

Although we have not yet conducted our October 1, ~~2015~~2016 goodwill and other impairment tests, there have been no impairments recognized through the first nine months of ~~2015.~~2016. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such a charge would be material.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We have not used any derivative financial instruments during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016, including trading or speculating on changes in interest rates or commodity prices of materials used in our business.

We are exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates for borrowings under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement, which provides for a revolving credit facility and a term loan. Borrowings under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016, there were no borrowings of $125.0 million outstanding under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility and the balance of the 2016 Term Loan was ~~$319.4~~$400.0 million. This instrument bears interest at (1) a base rate ~~which~~plus a margin of 0.00% to 0.75%, based on certain financial tests, or (2) United States dollar LIBOR (0.52% at September 30, 2016) plus 1.00% to 1.75%, based on certain financial tests. The base rate is determined by the greater of (a) the prime commercial lending rate announced by Bank of Montreal from time to time (~~3.25%~~(3.50% at September 30, ~~2015~~)2016), (b) the federal funds effective rate, plus ~~0.25% to 0.75% based on certain financial tests~~½ of 1.00%, (c) the daily one month LIBOR rate, plus 1.00%, or ~~(2) United States dollar LIBOR (0.19%~~ at ~~September 30, 2015) plus 1.25% to 1.75% based on certain financial tests.~~(d) 0.00%. The interest rate in effect at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~1.44%~~1.77%. Based on the ~~$319.4~~$525.0 million borrowings outstanding under the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement, if overall interest rates were to increase by 25 basis points, interest expense, net of income taxes, would increase by approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.8 million in the next twelve months. Conversely, if overall interest rates were to decrease by 25 basis points, interest expense, net of income taxes, would decrease by approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.8 million in the next twelve months. Fees for letters of credit issued under the ~~2013~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility range from ~~1.25%~~1.00% to 1.75% of the respective face amounts of outstanding letters of credit and are computed based on certain financial tests. The ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement expires on ~~November 25, 2018.~~August 3, 2021. There is no guarantee that we will be able to renew the ~~2013~~2016 Credit Agreement at its expiration.

We are also exposed to construction market risk and its potential related impact on accounts receivable or costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts. The amounts recorded may be at risk if our customers’ ability to pay these obligations is negatively impacted by economic conditions. We continually monitor the creditworthiness of our customers and maintain on-going discussions with customers regarding contract status with respect to change orders and billing terms. Therefore, we believe we take appropriate action to manage market and other risks, but there is no assurance that we will be able to reasonably identify all risks with respect to collectibility of these assets. See also the previous discussions of Revenue Recognition ~~form~~from Long-term Construction Contracts and Services Contracts and Accounts Receivable under the heading, “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, a component of equity, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We believe the exposure to the effects that fluctuating foreign currencies may have on our consolidated results of operations is limited because the foreign operations primarily invoice customers and

Table of Contents

collect obligations in their respective local currencies. Additionally, expenses associated with these transactions are generally contracted and paid for in their same local currencies.

In addition, we are exposed to market risk of fluctuations in certain commodity prices of materials, such as copper and steel, which are used as components of supplies or materials utilized in our construction, ~~and~~ building services and industrial services operations. We are also exposed to increases in energy prices, particularly as they relate to gasoline prices for our fleet of over ~~8,500~~9,500 vehicles. While we believe we can increase our contract prices to adjust for some price increases in commodities, there can be no assurance that such price increases, ~~of commodities,~~ if they were to occur, would be recoverable. Additionally, our fixed price contracts do not allow us to adjust our prices and, as a result, increases in material or fuel costs could reduce our profitability with respect to projects in progress.

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), our President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony J. Guzzi, and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mark A. Pompa, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934) are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and ~~15(d)-15(f)~~15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

The following table summarizes repurchases of our common stock made by us during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 ~~by us:~~:

Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾

Average Price
Paid Per Share

Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

Approximate Dollar Value
of Shares That May Yet be
Purchased Under
the Plan or Programs
July 1, 2015 to
July 31, 2015
None None None $145,319,304
August 1, 2015 to
August 31, 2015
None None None $145,319,304
September 1, 2015 to
September 30 2015
41,495 $43.93 None $143,495,236



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾	Average Price Paid Per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs
July 1, 2016 to July 31, 2016	None	None	None	$228,063,746
August 1, 2016 to August 31, 2016	None	None	None	$228,063,746
September 1, 2016 to September 30 2016	50,000	$59.02	50,000	$225,111,266

(1)

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95 to this quarterly report.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

For the list of exhibits, see the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page hereof, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

3231

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: October ~~29, 2015~~27, 2016



	EMCOR GROUP, INC.
	(Registrant)

BY:	/s/ ANTHONY J. GUZZI
	Anthony J. Guzzi
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

BY:	/s/ MARK A. POMPA
	Mark A. Pompa
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

3332

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated By Reference to or Filed Herewith, as Indicated Below

2(a-1)	Purchase Agreement dated as of February 11, 2002 by and among Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and EMCOR-CSI Holding Co.	Exhibit 2.1 to EMCOR Group, Inc.’s (“EMCOR”) Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2002
2(a-2)	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 20, 2007 between FR X Ohmstede Holdings LLC and EMCOR Group, Inc.	Exhibit 2.1 to EMCOR’s Report on Form 8-K (Date of Report August 20, 2007)
2(a-3)	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2013 by and among Texas Turnaround LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Altair Strickland Group, Inc., a Texas corporation, Rep Holdings LLC, a Texas limited liability company, ASG Key Employee LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Repcon Key Employee LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Gulfstar MBII, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, The Trustee of the James T. Robinson and Diana J. Robinson 2010 Irrevocable Trust, The Trustee of the Steven Rothbauer 2012 Descendant’s Trust, The Co-Trustees of the Patia Strickland 2012 Descendant’s Trust, The Co-Trustees of the Carter Strickland 2012 Descendant’s Trust, and The Co-Trustees of the Walton 2012 Grandchildren’s Trust (collectively, “Sellers”) and EMCOR Group, Inc.	Exhibit 2.1 to EMCOR’s Report on Form 8-K (Date of Report June 17, 2013)
3(a-1)	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EMCOR filed December 15, 1994	Exhibit 3(a-5) to EMCOR’s Registration Statement on Form 10 as originally filed March 17, 1995 (“Form 10”)
3(a-2)	Amendment dated November 28, 1995 to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EMCOR	Exhibit 3(a-2) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 (“1995 Form 10-K”)
3(a-3)	Amendment dated February 12, 1998 to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EMCOR	Exhibit 3(a-3) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (“1997 Form 10-K”)
3(a-4)	Amendment dated January 27, 2006 to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EMCOR	Exhibit 3(a-4) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (“2005 Form 10-K”)
3(a-5)	Amendment dated September 18, 2007 to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EMCOR	Exhibit A to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement dated August 17, 2007 for Special Meeting of Stockholders held September 18, 2007
3(b)	Amended and Restated By-Laws	Exhibit 3(b) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (“1998 Form 10-K”)
3(c)	Amendment of Article I, Section 6(c) and Section 6(j) of the Amended and Restated By-Laws	Exhibit 3.1 to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Report on Form 8-K (Date of Report December 5, 2013)
4(a)	~~Fourth~~Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of ~~November 25, 2013~~August 3, 2016 by and among EMCOR Group, Inc. and a subsidiary and Bank of Montreal, as Agent and the lenders listed on the signature pages thereof (the “Credit Agreement”)	~~Exhibit 4(a) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 ("2013 Form 10-K")~~Filed herewith
4(b)	~~Fourth~~Fifth Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of ~~November 25, 2013~~August 3, 2016 among EMCOR, certain of its U.S. subsidiaries, and Bank of Montreal, as Agent	~~Exhibit 4(b) to 2013 Form 10-K~~Filed herewith
4(c)	~~Fourth~~Fifth Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement dated as of ~~November 25, 2013~~August 3, 2016 among EMCOR, certain of its U.S. subsidiaries, and Bank of Montreal, as Agent	~~Exhibit 4(c) to 2013 Form 10-K~~Filed herewith
4(d)	~~Third~~Fourth Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement dated as of ~~November 25, 2013~~August 3, 2016 by certain of EMCOR’s U.S. subsidiaries in favor of Bank of Montreal, as Agent	~~Exhibit 4(d) to 2013 Form 10-K~~Filed herewith

3433

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated By Reference to or Filed Herewith, as Indicated Below

10(a)	Form of Severance Agreement (“Severance Agreement”) between EMCOR and each of Sheldon I. Cammaker, R. Kevin Matz and Mark A. Pompa	Exhibit 10.1 to the April 2005 Form 8-K
10(b)	Form of Amendment to Severance Agreement between EMCOR and each of Sheldon I. Cammaker, R. Kevin Matz and Mark A. Pompa	Exhibit 10(c) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (“March 2007 Form 10-Q”)
10(c)	Letter Agreement dated October 12, 2004 between Anthony Guzzi and EMCOR (the “Guzzi Letter Agreement”)	Exhibit 10.1 to EMCOR’s Report on Form 8-K (Date of Report October 12, 2004)
10(d)	Form of Confidentiality Agreement between Anthony Guzzi and EMCOR	Exhibit C to the Guzzi Letter Agreement
10(e)	Form of Indemnification Agreement between EMCOR and each of its officers and directors	Exhibit F to the Guzzi Letter Agreement
10(f-1)	Severance Agreement (“Guzzi Severance Agreement”) dated October 25, 2004 between Anthony Guzzi and EMCOR	Exhibit D to the Guzzi Letter Agreement
10(f-2)	Amendment to Guzzi Severance Agreement	Exhibit 10(g-2) to the March 2007 Form 10-Q
10(g-1)	Continuity Agreement dated as of June 22, 1998 between Sheldon I. Cammaker and EMCOR (“Cammaker Continuity Agreement”)	Exhibit 10(c) to the June 1998 Form 10-Q
10(g-2)	Amendment dated as of May 4, 1999 to Cammaker Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(i) to the June 1999 Form 10-Q
10(g-3)	Amendment dated as of March 1, 2007 to Cammaker Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(m-3) to the March 2007 Form 10-Q
10(h-1)	Continuity Agreement dated as of June 22, 1998 between R. Kevin Matz and EMCOR (“Matz Continuity Agreement”)	Exhibit 10(f) to the June 1998 Form 10-Q
10(h-2)	Amendment dated as of May 4, 1999 to Matz Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(m) to the June 1999 Form 10-Q
10(h-3)	Amendment dated as of January 1, 2002 to Matz Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(o-3) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 (“March 2002 Form 10-Q”)
10(h-4)	Amendment dated as of March 1, 2007 to Matz Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(n-4) to the March 2007 Form 10-Q
10(i-1)	Continuity Agreement dated as of June 22, 1998 between Mark A. Pompa and EMCOR (“Pompa Continuity Agreement”)	Exhibit 10(g) to the June 1998 Form 10-Q
10(i-2)	Amendment dated as of May 4, 1999 to Pompa Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(n) to the June 1999 Form 10-Q
10(i-3)	Amendment dated as of January 1, 2002 to Pompa Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(p-3) to the March 2002 Form 10-Q
10(i-4)	Amendment dated as of March 1, 2007 to Pompa Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(o-4) to the March 2007 Form 10-Q
10(j-1)	Change of Control Agreement dated as of October 25, 2004 between Anthony Guzzi (“Guzzi”) and EMCOR (“Guzzi Continuity Agreement”)	Exhibit E to the Guzzi Letter Agreement
10(j-2)	Amendment dated as of March 1, 2007 to Guzzi Continuity Agreement	Exhibit 10(p-2) to the March 2007 Form 10-Q

3534

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated By Reference to or Filed Herewith, as Indicated Below

10(j-3)	Amendment to Continuity Agreements and Severance Agreements with Sheldon I. Cammaker, Anthony J. Guzzi, R. Kevin Matz and Mark A. Pompa	Exhibit 10(q) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (“2008 Form 10-K”)
10(k-1)	Amendment dated as of March 29, 2010 to Severance Agreement with Sheldon I. Cammaker, Anthony J. Guzzi, R. Kevin Matz and Mark A. Pompa	Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (Date of Report March 29, 2010) (“March 2010 Form 8-K”)
10(k-2)	Third Amendment to Severance Agreement dated June 4, 2015 between EMCOR and Sheldon I. Cammaker	Exhibit 10(k-2) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 ("(“June 2015 Form ~~10-Q"~~10-Q”)
10(l-1)	Severence Agreement dated as of October 26, 2016 between EMCOR and Maxine L. Mauricio	Filed herewith
10(l-2)	Continuity Agreeement dated as of October 26, 2016 between EMCOR and Maxine L. Mauricio	Filed herewith
10(m-1)	EMCOR Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)	Exhibit 10 to Form 8-K (Date of Report December 15, 2005)
~~10(l-2)~~10(m-2)	First Amendment to LTIP and updated Schedule A to LTIP	Exhibit 10(s-2) to 2008 Form 10-K
~~10(l-3)~~10(m-3)	Second Amendment to LTIP	Exhibit 10.2 to March 2010 Form 8-K
~~10(l-4)~~10(m-4)	Third Amendment to LTIP	Exhibit 10(q-4) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 ("(“March 2012 Form ~~10-Q"~~10-Q”)
~~10(l-5)~~10(m-5)	Fourth Amendment to LTIP	Exhibit 10(l-5) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014
~~10(l-6)~~10(m-6)	Form of Certificate Representing Stock Units issued under LTIP	Exhibit 10(t-2) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“2007 Form 10-K”)
~~10(m-1)~~10(m-7)	~~2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan~~Fifth Amendment to LTIP	Exhibit ~~A to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting held on June 12, 2003 (“2003 Proxy Statement”)~~
~~10(m-2)~~	~~First Amendment to 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Plan~~	~~Exhibit 10(u-2)~~10(l-7) to EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2006~~2015 (“~~2006~~2015 Form 10-K”)
10(m-8)	Sixth Amendment to LTIP	Exhibit 10(l-8) to 2015 Form 10-K
10(n)	Key Executive Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated	Exhibit B to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting held June 13, 2013
~~10(o)~~	~~Consents on December 15, 2009 to Transfer Stock Options by Non-Employee Directors~~	~~Exhibit 10(z) to 2009 Form 10-K~~
~~10(p-1)~~10(o-1)	2007 Incentive Plan	Exhibit B to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting held June 20, 2007
~~10(p-2)~~	~~Option Agreement dated December 13, 2007 under 2007 Incentive Plan between Jerry E. Ryan and EMCOR~~	~~Exhibit 10(h)(h-2) to 2007 Form 10-K~~
~~10(p-3)~~	~~Option Agreement dated December 15, 2008 under 2007 Incentive Plan between David Laidley and EMCOR~~	~~Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (Date of Report December 15, 2008)~~
~~10(p-4)~~10(o-2)	Form of Option Agreement under 2007 Incentive Plan between EMCOR and each non-employee director electing to receive options as part of annual retainer	Exhibit 10(h)(h-3) to 2007 Form 10-K
~~10(q-1)~~10(p-1)	Amended and Restated 2010 Incentive Plan	~~Filed herewith~~Exhibit 10(q-1) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015
~~10(q-2)~~10(p-2)	Form of Option Agreement under 2010 Incentive Plan between EMCOR and each non-employee director with respect to grant of options upon re-election at June 11, 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders	Exhibit 10(i)(i-2) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
~~10(q-3)~~10(p-3)	Form of Option Agreement under 2010 Incentive Plan, as amended, between EMCOR and each non-employee director electing to receive options as part of annual retainer	Exhibit 10(q)(q) to 2011 Form 10-K
10(q)	EMCOR Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan	Exhibit C to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting held June 18, 2008
10(r)	Director Award Program Adopted May 13, 2011, as amended and restated December 14, 2011	Exhibit 10(n)(n) to 2011 Form 10-K
10(s)	Amendment to Option Agreements	Exhibit 10(r)(r) to 2011 Form 10-K
10(t)	Form of Non-LTIP Stock Unit Certificate	Exhibit 10(p)(p) to the March 31, 2012 Form 10-Q

3635

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated By Reference to or Filed Herewith, as Indicated Below

~~10(r)~~	~~EMCOR Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan~~	~~Exhibit C to EMCOR’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting held June 18, 2008~~
~~10(s)~~	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated January 3, 2012 between EMCOR and each of Larry J. Bump, Albert Fried, Jr., Richard F. Hamm, Jr., David H. Laidley, Frank T. MacInnis, Jerry E. Ryan and Michael T. Yonker	~~Exhibit 10(m)(m) to 2011 Form 10-K~~
~~10(t-1)~~	~~Director Award Program Adopted May 13, 2011, as amended and restated December 14, 2011~~	~~Exhibit 10(n)(n) to 2011 Form 10-K~~
~~10(t-2)~~	Form of Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated December 14, 2011 amending and restating restricted stock award agreement dated June 1, 2011 under Director Award Program with each of Stephen W. Bershad, David A.B. Brown, Larry J. Bump, Albert Fried, Jr., Richard F. Hamm, Jr., David H. Laidley, Jerry E. Ryan and Michael T. Yonker	~~Exhibit 10(o)(o) to 2011 Form 10-K~~
10(u)	~~Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated May 9, 2011 between EMCOR and Anthony J. Guzzi~~	~~Exhibit 10(o)(o) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011~~
~~10(v)~~	~~Amendment to Option Agreements~~	~~Exhibit 10(r)(r) to 2011 Form 10-K~~
~~10(w)~~	~~Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated March , 2012 between EMCOR and each of Sheldon I. Cammaker, R. Kevin Matz and Mark A. Pompa~~	~~Exhibit 10(o)(o) to the March 31, 2012 Form 10-Q~~
~~10(x)~~	~~Form of Non-LTIP Stock Unit Certificate~~	~~Exhibit 10(p)(p) to the March 31, 2012 Form 10-Q~~
~~10(y)~~	Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement	Exhibit 10(k)(k) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 ("(“June 2012 Form ~~10-Q"~~10-Q”)
~~10(z)~~10(v)	Director Award Program, as Amended and Restated December 16, 2014	Exhibit 10(z) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 ("(“2014 Form ~~10-K"~~10-K”)
~~10(a)(a)~~10(w)	EMCOR Group, Inc. Voluntary Deferral Plan	Exhibit 10(e)(e) to 2012 Form 10-K
~~10(b)(b)~~10(x)	First Amendment to EMCOR Group, Inc. Voluntary Deferral Plan	Exhibit 10(e)(e) to 2013 Form 10-K
~~10(c)(c)~~10(y)	Form of Executive Restricted Stock Unit Agreement	Exhibit 10(f)(f) to 2012 Form 10-K
~~10(d)(d)~~10(z)	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated October 23, 2013 between EMCOR and Stephen W. Bershad	Exhibit 10(g)(g) to 2013 Form 10-K
~~10(e)(e)~~10(a)(a)	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated June 11, 2014 between EMCOR and Stephen W. Bershad	Exhibit 10(g)(g) to ~~EMCOR's~~EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 ("(“June 2014 Form ~~10-Q"~~10-Q”)
~~10(f)(f)~~10(b)(b)	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated June 11, 2015 between EMCOR and Stephen W. Bershad	Exhibit 10(f)(f) to the June 30, 2015 Form 10-Q
10(c)(c)	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated October 29, 2015 between EMCOR and Steven B. Schwarzwaelder	Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (Date of Report October 30, 2015)
10(d)(d)	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated June 2, 2016 between EMCOR and Stephen W. Bershad	Exhibit 10(c)(c) to EMCOR’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016
10(e)(e)	Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy	Exhibit 10(h)(h) to 2015 Form 10-K
11	Computation of Basic EPS and Diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Anthony J. Guzzi, the President and Chief Executive Officer	Filed herewith
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Mark A. Pompa, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	Filed herewith

~~Table of Contents~~

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~



~~Exhibit~~ ~~No.~~	~~Description~~	~~Incorporated By Reference to or~~ ~~Filed Herewith, as Indicated Below~~

32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the President and Chief Executive Officer	Furnished
32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	Furnished
95	Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters	~~Exhibit 95 to the June 2015 Form 10-Q~~Filed herewith
101	The following materials from EMCOR Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.	Filed

3836