UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-06732

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware		95-6021257
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

445 South Street, Morristown, NJ		07960
(Address of Principal Executive Office)		(Zip Code)

(862) 345-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer ¨o	Non-accelerated filer¨ o	Smaller reporting company ¨o	Emerging growth company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Applicable Only to Corporate Issuers:

Indicate the number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of the latest practicable date.



Class		Outstanding at ~~October~~July 21, ~~2016~~ 2017
Common Stock, $0.10 par value		~~130,415,290~~131,024,826

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT

For the Quarter Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017



	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
		Page
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2015~~2016	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the ~~Nine Month~~Three and Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8
	Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation	8
	Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements	89
	Note 3. ~~Dispositions~~Acquisitions and ~~Other~~Dispositions	910
	Note 4. Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) and Equity	1011
	Note 5. Financial Information by Business Segments	12
	Note 6. Consolidated Debt	13
	Note 7. Income Taxes	15
	Note 8. Supplementary Information	15
	Note 9. Stock-Based Compensation	1516
	Note 10. Financial Instruments	1617
	Note 11. Derivative Instruments	1819
	Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies	1920
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
	Consolidated Results of Operations	23
	Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP)	30
	Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)	31
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	32
	Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)	3433
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3735
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3736
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4037
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4037
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4037
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4037
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	4037
Item 5.	Other Information	4037
Item 6.	Exhibits	4037
	OTHER
Signatures		4138

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are those that address activities, events or developments that we or our management intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. They are based on management’s assumptions and assessments in the light of past experience and trends, current economic and industry conditions, expected future developments and other relevant factors. They are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those envisaged by our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties, which can affect our performance in both the ~~near-~~near and long-term. These forward-looking statements should be considered in the light of the information included in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the Risk Factors, as well as the description of trends and other factors in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in our ~~2015~~2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(Unaudited) (In millions, except per share amounts)												(Unaudited) (In millions, except per share amounts)
OPERATING REVENUE:
Waste and service revenue	$	299		$	283		$	875		$	805		$	310		$	297		$	596		$	576
Energy revenue	92			108			279			319			75			86			161			187
Recycled metals revenue	14			16			44			49			15			17			31			30
Other operating revenue	16			15			44			40			24			18			40			28
Total operating revenue	421			422			1,242			1,213			424			418			828			821
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Plant operating expense	272			260			901			849			319			314			651			629
Other operating expense	14			18			45			55			2			19			17			31
General and administrative expense	23			20			71			71			30			25			58			48
Depreciation and amortization expense	52			50			155			148			52			51			104			103
Impairment charges	—			—			19			24			1			4			1			19
Total operating expense	361			348			1,191			1,147			404			413			831			830
Operating income	60			74			51			66
Other income (expense):
Operating income (loss)													20			5			(3		)	(9		)
Other expense:
Interest expense, net	(35		)	(34		)	(103		)	(102		)	(35		)	(34		)	(71		)	(68		)
Gain on asset sales	43			—			43			—
Loss on asset sales													(2		)	—			(6		)	—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			—			(2		)	(13		)	—			(13		)	—
Other expense, net	(1		)	—			(1		)	(1		)
Total other income (expense)	7			(34		)	(61		)	(105		)
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net (loss) income from unconsolidated investments	67			40			(10		)	(39		)
Other income (expense), net													—			2			—			—
Total other expense													(50		)	(32		)	(90		)	(68		)
Loss before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income from unconsolidated investments													(30		)	(27		)	(93		)	(77		)
Income tax (expense) benefit	(12		)	(11		)	(5		)	19			(8		)	(3		)	3			7
Equity in net (loss) income from unconsolidated investments	(1		)	5			3			11
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION	$	54		$	34		$	(12	)	$	(9	)
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments													1			1			1			4
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION													$	(37	)	$	(29	)	$	(89	)	$	(66	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic	129			132			129			132			130			129			129			129
Diluted	131			134			129			132			130			129			129			129

Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation Stockholders:
Loss Per Share Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation Stockholders:
Basic	$	0.42		$	0.26		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(0.51	)
Diluted	$	0.42		$	0.25		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(0.51	)

Cash Dividend Declared Per Share:	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.75		$	0.75		$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.50		$	0.50

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2016
2015
2016
2015

(Unaudited)
(In millions)
Net income (loss) attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation $ 54
$ 34
$ (12 ) $ (9 )
Foreign currency translation (5 ) (5 ) 1
(14 )
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net of tax expense(benefit) of $1, $1, $(4) and $3, respectively —
—
(20 ) 6
Other comprehensive loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation (5 ) (5 ) (19 ) (8 )
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation $ 49
$ 29
$ (31 ) $ (17 )



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
	(Unaudited, in millions)
Net loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation	$	(37	)	$	(29	)	$	(89	)	$	(66	)
Foreign currency translation	9			(3		)	12			6
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of tax expense of $1, ($5), $1 and ($5), respectively	3			(13		)	3			(20		)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation	12			(16		)	15			(14		)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation	$	(25	)	$	(45	)	$	(74	)	$	(80	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	(In millions, except per share amounts)						(In millions, except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	113		$	94		$	48		$	84
Restricted funds held in trust	62			77			50			56
Receivables (less allowances of $9 million and $7 million, respectively)	299			312
Receivables (less allowances of $10 million and $9 million, respectively)							302			332
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	73			114			77			72
Assets held for sale	—			97
Total Current Assets	547			694			477			544
Property, plant and equipment, net	2,997			2,690			3,113			3,024
Restricted funds held in trust	57			83			55			54
Waste, service and energy contracts, net	269			284			257			263
Other intangible assets, net	35			38			39			34
Goodwill	303			301			312			302
Other assets	67			121			67			63
Total Assets	$	4,275		$	4,211		$	4,320		$	4,284
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	9		$	8		$	10		$	9
Current portion of project debt	23			16			22			22
Accounts payable	52			90			54			98
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	234			234			292			289
Liabilities held for sale	—			23
Total Current Liabilities	318			371			378			418
Long-term debt	2,286			2,255			2,368			2,243
Project debt	381			159			436			361
Deferred income taxes	595			595			606			617
Waste and service contracts, net	8			13
Other liabilities	187			178			186			176
Total Liabilities	3,775			3,571			3,974			3,815
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
Equity:
Covanta Holding Corporation stockholders equity:
Covanta Holding Corporation stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock ($0.10 par value; authorized 10 shares; none issued and outstanding)	—			—			—			—
Common stock ($0.10 par value; authorized 250 shares; issued 136 shares, outstanding 130 and 131, respectively)	14			14
Common stock ($0.10 par value; authorized 250 shares; issued 136 shares, outstanding 131 and 130, respectively)							14			14
Additional paid-in capital	804			801			816			807
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(53		)	(34		)	(47		)	(62		)
Accumulated deficit	(264		)	(143		)	(436		)	(289		)
Treasury stock, at par	(1		)	—			(1		)	(1		)
Total Covanta Holding Corporation stockholders' equity	500			638			346			469
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	—			2
Total Equity	500			640
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,275		$	4,211		$	4,320		$	4,284

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Unaudited, in millions)						(Unaudited, in millions)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(12	)	$	(9	)	$	(89	)	$	(66	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense	155			148			104			103
Amortization of long-term debt deferred financing costs	5			6			3			4
Gain on asset sales	(43		)	—
Loss on asset sales							6			—
Impairment charges	19			24			1			19
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			2			13			—
Provision for doubtful accounts							3			—
Stock-based compensation expense	13			15			11			9
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments	(3		)	(11		)	(1		)	(4		)
Dividends from unconsolidated investments	2			3			—			1
Deferred income taxes	3			(22		)	(6		)	(8		)
Other, net	(3		)	—			(3		)	1
Change in restricted funds held in trust	22			14			(1		)	3
Change in working capital	(12		)	(16		)
Change in working capital, net of effects of acquisitions							(15		)	—
Net cash provided by operating activities	146			154			26			62
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(282		)	(267		)	(152		)	(184		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(9		)	(70		)	(16		)	(9		)
Proceeds from asset sales	107			—
Property insurance proceeds	2			—			5			—
Other, net	4			—			(3		)	2
Net cash used in investing activities	(178		)	(337		)	(166		)	(191		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt	—			294			400			—
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facility	658			655			633			515
Proceeds from equipment financing capital leases	—			15
Proceeds from borrowings on project debt	—			59
Proceeds from borrowings on Dublin project financing	139			85			60			77
Payments of borrowings on revolving credit facility							(501		)	(370		)
Payments on long-term debt	(2		)	(196		)	(412		)	(1		)
Payments of borrowings on revolving credit facility	(623		)	(509		)
Payments on equipment financing capital leases	(3		)	(3		)	(2		)	(2		)
Payments on project debt	(17		)	(63		)	(12		)	(9		)
Payments of deferred financing costs	(5		)	(8		)	(9		)	(3		)
Cash dividends paid to stockholders	(98		)	(100		)	(65		)	(65		)
Change in restricted funds held in trust	19			(62		)	5			18
Common stock repurchased	(20		)	—			—			(20		)
Other, net							4			(1		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	48			167			101			139
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	1			(4		)	3			2
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	17			(20		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents							(36		)	12
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	96			91			84			96
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	113			71			$	48		$	108
Less: Cash and cash equivalents of assets held for sale at end of period	—			2
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at end of period	$	113		$	69

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The terms “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us”, "Covanta" and “Company” refer to Covanta Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries; the term “Covanta Energy” refers to our subsidiary Covanta Energy, LLC and its subsidiaries.

Organization

Covanta is one of the world’s largest owners and operators of infrastructure for the conversion of waste to energy (known as “energy-from-waste” or “EfW”), and also owns and operates related waste transport, processing and disposal ~~and other renewable energy production businesses.~~assets. EfW serves two key markets as both a sustainable waste management solution that is environmentally superior to landfilling and as a source of clean energy that reduces overall greenhouse gas emissions and is considered renewable under the laws of many states and under federal law. Our facilities are critical infrastructure assets that allow our customers, which are principally municipal entities, to provide an essential public service.

Our EfW facilities earn revenue from both the disposal of waste and the generation of electricity and/or steam, generally under contracts, as well as from the sale of metal recovered during the EfW process. We process approximately 20 million tons of solid waste annually. We operate and/or have ownership positions in 42 energy-from-waste facilities, which are primarily located in North America. In total, these assets produce approximately 10 million megawatt hours (“MWh”) of baseload electricity annually. We also operate a waste management infrastructure that is complementary to our core EfW business.

In addition to our core EfW business, we offer a variety of sustainable waste management solutions in response to customer demand, including on site clean-up services, wastewater treatment, transportation and logistics, recycling and depackaging. Together with our processing of non-hazardous "profiled waste" for purposes of assured destruction or sustainability goals in our EfW facilities, we offer these services under our Covanta Environmental Solutions brand.

We have one reportable segment, North America, which is comprised of waste and energy services operations located primarily in the United States and Canada. We are currently constructing an energy-from-waste facility in Dublin, Ireland, which we own and will operate upon completion. We hold ~~equity~~ interests in an energy-from-waste facility in Italy and an infrastructure business in China ~~and Italy.~~which is engaged in energy-from-waste operations. For additional information regarding our reportable segment, see Note 5. Financial Information by Business Segments.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and notes thereto required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements. All intra-entity accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2016~~2017. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016, was derived from audited annual consolidated financial statements, but does not contain all of the notes thereto from the annual consolidated financial statements. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (“Form 10-K”).

~~Reclassification~~Change in Accounting Principle

~~During~~In March 2016, the ~~nine~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an update to simplify the accounting for employee share-based payments, including income tax impacts, classification on the statement of cash flows, and forfeitures. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2017. The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and deficiencies to be recognized in the income statement rather than in additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet. As a result of applying this change prospectively, we recognized $0 and $0.5 million of tax expense in our provision for income taxes during the three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, certain~~2017, respectively. In addition, adoption of the new guidance resulted in a $9 million decrease to Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2017, to recognize the cumulative effect of deferred income taxes for U.S. Federal net operating loss and other carryforwards attributable to excess tax benefits. Excess tax benefits were not recognized for financial reporting purposes in the prior period. We prospectively applied the guidance which requires presentation of excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Cash paid on employees’ behalf related to shares withheld for tax purposes was retrospectively applied and required reclassifying $4 million from cash provided by operating activities to cash provided by financing activities on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows as of June 30, 2016. We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than to estimate them; adoption of this accounting policy election resulted in a $1 million increase to Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2017 to recognize the cumulative-effect of removing the forfeiture estimate.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

In January 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding business combinations, specifically on clarifying the definition of a business and provided a screen to determine whether or not an integrated set of assets and activities constitutes a business. We are required to adopt the updates in this standard in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. The standard must be applied prospectively on or after the effective date, and no disclosures for a change in accounting principle are required at transition. Early adoption is permitted for transactions (i.e., acquisitions or dispositions) that occurred before the issuance date or effective date of the standard if the transactions were not reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We early adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts have been reclassified in our prior period condensed consolidated balance sheet ~~and cash flows~~ to conform to current year presentation and such amounts were not material to current and prior periods. ~~We concluded that it was appropriate to include Net interest expense on project debt within Interest expense, net on~~Also, as discussed above under Change in Accounting Principle, certain amounts have been reclassified in our consolidated statement of operations. Previously, Net interest expense on project debt was reported separately, as a component of Operating expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, Net interest expense on project debt of $3 million and $10 million, respectively, was included in Interest expense, net on ourprior period condensed consolidated statement of ~~operations and as a result, Operating income increased accordingly for those periods.~~

~~Change in Accounting Principle~~

~~Effective January 1, 2016, we adopted guidance concerning the presentation of debt issuance costs, which are required~~cash flows to ~~be presented as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. We adopted this guidance retrospectively, which resulted in a reduction in our December 31, 2015~~conform to current ~~and non-current asset balances of $8 million and $40 million, respectively, along with a corresponding reduction in current and long-term debt balances. For additional information, see~~ ~~Note 6. Consolidated Debt~~.year presentation.

NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In ~~August 2016,~~May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~("FASB"~~(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-10 “Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853): Determining the Customer of the Operation Services (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),” which provides clarity on determining the customer in a service concession arrangement. The guidance, which is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018, will be applied on a modified retrospective basis beginning with the earliest period presented. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This standard is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which updated guidance to eliminate the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge (referred to as Step 2). As a result, an impairment charge will equal the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. The guidance is effective for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The impact of this guidance for the Company will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash,” requiring that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The guidance is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018 on a retrospective basis. Adoption of this guidance will eliminate the disclosure of Change in restricted funds held in trust, which we currently include in Net cash provided by operating activities and Net cash provided by financing activities on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory,” requiring comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes on intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory, which was previously prohibited. The guidance now requires us to recognize the tax expense from the intra-entity transfer of an asset when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. We are required to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which updated guidance on eight specific cash flow issues with regard to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows in order to clarify existing guidance and reduce diversity in practice. The guidance is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018 on a retrospective basis, unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it should be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which amended guidance for lease arrangements in order to increase transparency and comparability by providing additional information to users of financial statements regarding

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

In March 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for employee share-based compensation. The updated guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance, which is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2017, may be early adopted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for lease arrangements in order to increase transparency and comparability by providing additional information to users of financial statements regarding an entity's leasing activities. The revised guidance seeks to achieve this objective by requiring reporting entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for substantially all lease arrangements. The guidance, which is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2019, will be applied on a modified retrospective basis beginning with the earliest period presented. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ~~accounting guidance that would require~~ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which requires equity investments not accounted for as an equity method investment or that result in consolidation to be recorded at their fair value with changes in fair value recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. Those equity investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value may be measured at cost less impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes. This standard is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ~~guidance~~ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard is based on the principle that revenue is recognized in an amount expected to be collected and to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the transfer of goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and certainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to January 1, 2018 ~~while providing the option to early~~and we will adopt the standard on ~~the original effective date of~~ January 1, ~~2017. We do not intend to early adopt. We will first adopt the guidance of ASC606 in the first quarter of~~ 2018, as required. The ~~guidance~~standard can be adopted using either ~~retrospectively~~a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach as of the date of adoption. We continue to determine the impacts of the standard on our consolidated financial statements and have decided to adopt the standard using a ~~cumulative-effect~~modified retrospective approach which would result in a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. ~~We are currently evaluating~~Our implementation approach includes performing a detailed review of key contracts representative of the ~~adoption alternatives, which include utilizing a bottom-up approach to analyze~~services that we provide and assessing the ~~standard’s impact on our contract portfolio, comparing~~conformance of historical accounting policies and practices towith the new standard to identify potential differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to our contracts. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we yet determined the effect ofstandard. Because the standard ~~on our consolidated financial statements. We expect this determination will near completion in late 2016 or early 2017. Because the new standard will~~may impact our business processes, systems and controls, we ~~are in the process of developing~~continue to make progress on executing on a comprehensive change management project plan to ~~guide~~implement the ~~implementation.~~standard.

NOTE 3. ~~DISPOSITIONS~~ACQUISITIONS AND ~~OTHER~~DISPOSITIONS

The acquisitions in the section below are not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements individually or in the aggregate and therefore, disclosures of pro forma financial information have not been presented. The results of operations reflect the period of ownership of the acquired businesses, business development projects and dispositions.

Environmental Services Acquisitions

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired three environmental services businesses (one of which was accounted for as an asset purchase), in separate transactions, for approximately $17 million. These acquisitions expand our Covanta Environmental Solutions capabilities and client service offerings, and allow us to direct additional non-hazardous profiled waste volumes into our EfW facilities, and therefore are highly synergistic with our existing business.

China Investments

~~Our~~Prior to 2016, our interests in China included an 85% ownership of an EfW facility located in Jiangsu Province ("Taixing"), a 49% equity interest in an EfW facility located in Sichuan Province and a 40% equity interest in Chongqing Sanfeng Covanta Environmental Industry Co., a company located in the Chongqing Municipality that is engaged in the business of providing design and engineering, procurement, construction services and equipment sales for EfW facilities in China, as well as operating services for EfW facilities.

During ~~March~~ 2016, we completed the exchange of our ownership interests in China for a 15% ownership interest in Chongqing Sanfeng Covanta Environmental Industrial Group, Co., Ltd ("Sanfeng Environment") ~~pursuant to agreements entered into in July 2015. During September 2016, we completed the sale of~~and subsequently sold approximately 90% of the aforementioned ownership interest in Sanfeng Environment to a third-party, a subsidiary of CITIC Limited ("CITIC"), a leading Chinese industrial conglomerate and investment company, pursuant to ~~the~~agreements entered into in July ~~2015 agreements.~~2015. As a result, during the ~~three months~~year ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2016, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $41 million. We received pre-tax proceeds of $105 million. The gain resulted from the excess of pre-tax proceeds over the cost-method book value of $70 million, plus $5 million of realized gains on the related cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, that were reclassified out of other comprehensive income. Subsequent to completing the exchange, Sanfeng Environment has made certain claims for indemnification under the agreement related to the condition of the facility in Taixing. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a $2 million and $6 million charge, respectively, related to these claims, which is included in loss on asset sales on our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

In 2016, in connection with these transactions, we entered into foreign currency exchange collars and forwards to hedge against rate fluctuations that impacted the cash proceeds in U.S. dollar terms. For more information, see Note 11. Derivative Instruments.

As of September 30, 2016, our remaining cost-method investment in Sanfeng Environment totaled $7 million and was included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as a component of "Other assets". Cost-method investments are carried at historical cost unless indicators of impairment are identified. There were no impairment indicators related to our cost-method investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, the assets and liabilities associated with our China investments were presented in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as Current "Assets held for sale” and Current "Liabilities held for sale.”

910

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

~~Pittsfield EfW Facility~~

~~In March~~As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, ~~we exercised an early termination option available under the steam sale agreement at~~ our ~~Pittsfield EfW facility that would have been effective~~remaining cost-method investment in ~~March 2017. Upon termination~~Sanfeng Environment totaled $6 million and was included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as a component of ~~the steam agreement, we intended~~"Other assets." There were no impairment indicators related to ~~cease operations at the Pittsfield facility. As a result,~~our cost-method investment during the first quarter of 2016, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million, pre-tax, which was calculated based on the estimated cash flows for this facility during its remaining operations utilizing Level 3 inputs. For more information regarding fair value measurements, see ~~Note 10. Financial Instruments~~.

In October 2016, we withdrew our termination notice. The City of Pittsfield has agreed to fund upgrades to the facility and the State of Massachusetts will provide energy tax credits, both of which will serve to improve the economics of the facility. In addition, we will continue to sell steam generated by the facility under an amended agreement.

~~Tartech Investment~~

~~We are party to a joint venture that was formed to recover and recycle metals from EfW ash monofills in North America. During the nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, due to operational difficulties and the decline in the scrap metal market, a valuation of the entity was conducted. As a result, we recorded a net impairment of our investment in this joint venture of $3 million, pre-tax, which represents our portion of the carrying value of the entity in excess of the fair value. Such amount was calculated based on the estimated liquidation value of the tangible equipment utilizing Level 3 inputs. For more information regarding fair value measurements, see ~~Note 10. Financial Instruments~~.2017.

NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”) AND EQUITY

Earnings Per Share

We calculate basic earnings per share ("EPS") using net earnings for the period and the weighted average number of outstanding shares of our common stock, par value ~~$0.10~~$0.10 per share, during the period. ~~Basic weighted average shares outstanding have decreased due to share repurchases.~~ Diluted earnings per share computations, as calculated under the treasury stock method, include the weighted average number of shares of additional outstanding common stock issuable for stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units whether or not currently exercisable. Diluted earnings per share does not include securities if their effect was anti-dilutive. Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016	2015	2016	2015	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	129	132	129	132	130	129	129	129
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units ⁽¹⁾	2	2	—	—	—	—	—	—
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	131	134	129	132	130	129	129	129

(1) Excludes the following securities because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016	2015	2016	2015	2017	2016	2017	2016
Stock options	1	1	1	1	—	1	1	1
Restricted stock	—	—	1	—	—	—	1	—
Restricted stock units	—	—	1	1	1	1	1	1

Equity

~~Share Repurchases~~

~~In January 2016, we repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares of our common stock at a weighted average cost of $15.29 per share for an aggregate amount of $18 million.~~

Dividends per Share

Dividends declared per share were $0.25 for each of the ~~three-month~~three month periods ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016 and ~~2015 and $0.75~~$0.50 for each of the ~~nine~~six month periods ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. Cash dividends declared ~~were~~totaled $33 million ~~and $34 million~~ for each of the three month periods ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016 and ~~2015, respectively and $99 million and $101~~$66 million for each of the ~~nine~~six month periods ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015, respectively.~~2016.

1011

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI")

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows (in millions):

Foreign Currency Translation Pension and Other Postretirement Plan Unrecognized Net Gain Net Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Derivatives Net Unrealized Gain on Securities Total
Balance December 31, 2014 $ (12 ) $ 2
$ (12 ) $ —
$ (22 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (14 ) —
6
—
(8 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss —
—
—
—
—
Net current period comprehensive (loss) income (14 ) —
6
—
(8 )
Balance September 30, 2015 $ (26 ) $ 2
$ (6 ) $ —
$ (30 )

Balance December 31, 2015 $ (34 ) $ 2
$ (2 ) $ —
$ (34 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 6
—
(20 ) —
(14 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (5 ) —
—
—
(5 )
Net current period comprehensive income (loss) 1
—
(20 ) —
(19 )
Balance September 30, 2016 $ (33 ) $ 2
$ (22 ) $ —
$ (53 )

Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Component Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations

Foreign currency translation $ 5
Gain on asset sales
5
Total before tax
—
Tax benefit
Total reclassifications $ 5
Net of tax



	Foreign Currency Translation			Pension and Other Postretirement Plan Unrecognized Net Gain		Net Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Derivatives			Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(34	)	$	2	$	(2	)	$	(34	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	6			—		(20		)	(14		)
Net current period comprehensive income (loss)	6			—		(20		)	(14		)
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	(28	)	$	2	$	(22	)	$	(48	)


Balance at December 31, 2016	$	(41	)	$	2	$	(23	)	$	(62	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	12			—		3			15
Net current period comprehensive income	12			—		3			15
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	(29	)	$	2	$	(20	)	$	(47	)

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)~~

NOTE 5. FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We have one reportable segment, North America, which is comprised of waste and energy services operations located primarily in the United States and Canada. The results of our reportable segment are as follows (in millions):


	North America		All Other ⁽¹⁾			Total		North America			All Other ⁽¹⁾			Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Operating revenue	$	421	$	—		$	421	$	424		$	—		$	424
Depreciation and amortization expense	52		—			52		52			—			52
Impairment charges	—		—			—		1			—			1
Operating income (loss)	62		(2		)	60		22			(2		)	20

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Operating revenue	$	411	$	11		$	422
Depreciation and amortization expense	52		(2		)	50
Impairment charges	—		—			—
Operating income	71		3			74

	North America		All Other ⁽¹⁾			Total
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Operating revenue	$	1,235	$	7		$	1,242	$	418		$	—		$	418
Depreciation and amortization expense	155		—			155		51			—			51
Impairment charges	19		—			19		4			—			4
Operating income (loss)	55		(4		)	51		7			(2		)	5
								North America			All Other ⁽¹⁾			Total
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Operating revenue	$	1,184	$	29		$	1,213	$	828		$	—		$	828
Depreciation and amortization expense	147		1			148		104			—			104
Impairment charges	24		—			24		1			—			1
Operating income	66		—			66
Operating income (loss)								1			(4		)	(3		)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Operating revenue								$	814		$	7		$	821
Depreciation and amortization expense								103			—			103
Impairment charges								19			—			19
Operating loss								(7		)	(2		)	(9		)


(1)	All other is comprised of the financial results of our operations outside of North America.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

NOTE 6. CONSOLIDATED DEBT

Consolidated debt is as follows (in millions):


	As of
	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015				June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
LONG-TERM DEBT:							LONG-TERM DEBT:
Revolving credit facility (2.95% - 3.20%)⁽¹⁾	$	384		$	348
Term loan, net (2.45%)	198			200
Revolving credit facility (3.42% - 3.67%)							Revolving credit facility (3.42% - 3.67%)	$	475		$	343
Term loan, net (2.87%)							Term loan, net (2.87%)	194			195
Credit Facilities Sub-total	$	582		$	548		Credit Facilities Sub-total	$	669		$	538
7.25% Senior notes due 2020	$	400		$	400		7.25% Senior notes due 2020	$	—		$	400
6.375% Senior notes due 2022	400			400			6.375% Senior notes due 2022	400			400
5.875% Senior notes due 2024	400			400			5.875% Senior notes due 2024	400			400
5.875% Senior notes due 2025							5.875% Senior notes due 2025	400			—
Less: deferred financing costs related to senior notes	(15		)	(16		)	Less: deferred financing costs related to senior notes	(17		)	(14		)
Senior Notes Sub-total	$	1,185		$	1,184		Senior Notes Sub-total	$	1,183		$	1,186
4.00% - 5.25% Tax-exempt bonds due 2024 through 2045	$	464		$	464		4.00% - 5.25% Tax-exempt bonds due 2024 through 2045	$	464		$	464
Less: deferred financing costs related to tax-exempt bonds	(5		)	(6		)	Less: deferred financing costs related to tax-exempt bonds	(5		)	(5		)
Tax-Exempt Bonds Sub-total	$	459		$	458		Tax-Exempt Bonds Sub-total	$	459		$	459
3.48% - 4.52% Equipment financing capital leases due 2024 through 2027	$	69		$	73		3.48% - 4.52% Equipment financing capital leases due 2024 through 2027	67			69
Total long-term debt	$	2,295		$	2,263		Total long-term debt	$	2,378		$	2,252
Less: current portion	(9		)	(8		)	Less: current portion	(10		)	(9		)
Noncurrent long-term debt	$	2,286		$	2,255		Noncurrent long-term debt	$	2,368		$	2,243
PROJECT DEBT:							PROJECT DEBT:
North America project debt:							North America project debt:
1.75% - 6.45% project debt related to service fee structures due 2017 through 2035	$	108		$	117
5.00% Union capital lease due 2016 through 2053	101			—
5.248% - 6.20% project debt related to tip fee structures due 2016 through 2020	16			23
4.00% - 5.00% project debt related to service fee structures due 2017 through 2035							4.00% - 5.00% project debt related to service fee structures due 2017 through 2035	$	68		$	78
5.00% Union capital lease due 2017 through 2053							5.00% Union capital lease due 2017 through 2053	97			99
5.25% - 6.20% project debt related to tip fee structures due 2017 through 2020							5.25% - 6.20% project debt related to tip fee structures due 2017 through 2020	16			16
Unamortized debt premium, net	4			5			Unamortized debt premium, net	4			4
Less: deferred financing costs related to North America project debt	(1		)	(1		)	Less: deferred financing costs related to North America project debt	(1		)	(1		)
Total North America project debt	$	228		$	144		Total North America project debt	$	184		$	196
Other project debt:							Other project debt:
Dublin senior loan due 2021 (5.72% - 6.41%)⁽²⁾	$	142		$	—		⁽¹⁾	$	235		$	155
Debt discount related to Dublin senior loan	(7		)	(8		)	Debt discount related to Dublin senior loan	(5		)	(6		)
Less: deferred financing cost related to Dublin senior loan	(19		)	(15		)	Less: deferred financing cost related to Dublin senior loan	(19		)	(18		)
Dublin senior loan, net	$	116		$	(23	)	Dublin senior loan, net	$	211		$	131
Dublin junior loan due 2022 (9.23% - 9.73%)	$	61		$	57		Dublin junior loan due 2022 (9.23% - 9.73%)	$	64		$	58
Debt discount related to Dublin junior loan	—			(1		)	Debt discount related to Dublin junior loan	—			(1		)
Less: deferred financing costs related to Dublin junior loan	(1		)	(2		)	Less: deferred financing costs related to Dublin junior loan	(1		)	(1		)
Dublin junior loan, net	$	60		$	54		Dublin junior loan, net	$	63		$	56
Total other project debt, net	$	176		$	31		Total other project debt, net	$	274		$	187
Total project debt	$	404		$	175		Total project debt	$	458		$	383
Less: Current portion, includes $1 of net unamortized premium	(23		)	(16		)
Less: Current portion							Less: Current portion	(22		)	(22		)
Noncurrent project debt	$	381		$	159		Noncurrent project debt	$	436		$	361
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED DEBT	$	2,699		$	2,438		TOTAL CONSOLIDATED DEBT	$	2,836		$	2,635
Less: Current debt	(32		)	(24		)	Less: Current debt	(32		)	(31		)
TOTAL NONCURRENT CONSOLIDATED DEBT	$	2,667		$	2,414		TOTAL NONCURRENT CONSOLIDATED DEBT	$	2,804		$	2,604
⁽¹⁾ Eurodollar rates only; excludes base rate borrowings.
⁽²⁾ Reflects hedged fixed rates.

⁽¹⁾Reflects hedged fixed rates.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

Credit Facilities

Our subsidiary, Covanta Energy, has $1.2 billion in senior secured credit facilities consisting of a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility, expiring 2019 through 2020, (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $200 million term loan due 2020 (the “Term Loan”) (collectively referred to as the "Credit Facilities").

~~Availability under~~ Revolving Credit Facility

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~,2017, we had ~~availability~~unused capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility as follows (in millions):

Total
Available
Under Credit Facility

Expiring ⁽¹⁾
Direct Borrowings as of
September 30, 2016 Outstanding Letters of Credit as of
September 30, 2016 Availability as of
September 30, 2016
Revolving Credit Facility $ 1,000
2020 $ 384
$ 148
$ 468



	Total			Direct Borrowings as of		Outstanding Letters of Credit as of		Unused Capacity as of
	Credit Facility		Expiring ⁽¹⁾	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2017		June 30, 2017
Revolving Credit Facility	$	1,000	2020	$	475	$	190	$	335

⁽¹⁾ The Revolving Credit Facility consists of two tranches; Tranche A ($950 million), which expires in 2020, and Tranche B ($50 million), which expires in March 2019.

Repayment Terms

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Term Loan has mandatory remaining amortization payments of $1$3 million in ~~2016,~~2017, $5 million in ~~each~~both of the years ~~2017 through~~2018 and 2019 and ~~$182~~$181 million in 2020. The Credit Facilities are pre-payable at par at our option at any time.

Guarantees and Security

The Credit Facilities are guaranteed by us and by certain of our subsidiaries. The subsidiaries that are party to the Credit Facilities agreed to secure all of the obligations under the Credit Facilities by granting, for the benefit of secured parties, a first priority lien on substantially all of their assets, to the extent permitted by existing contractual obligations; a pledge of substantially all of the capital stock of each of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of substantially all the capital stock of each of our foreign subsidiaries which are directly owned, in each case to the extent not otherwise pledged.

Credit Agreement Covenants

The loan documentation governing the Credit Facilities contains various affirmative and negative covenants, as well as financial maintenance covenants (financial ratios), that limit our ability to engage in certain types of transactions. We were in compliance with all of the affirmative and negative covenants under the Credit Facilities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

5.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (the "5.875% Notes")

In March 2017, we sold $400 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due July 2025. Interest on the 5.875% Notes is payable semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing on July 1, 2017, and the 5.875% Notes will mature on July 1, 2025 unless earlier redeemed or repurchased. Net proceeds from the sale of the 5.875% Notes were approximately $393 million, consisting of gross proceeds of $400 million net of approximately $7 million in offering expenses. On April 3, 2017, we used a portion of the net proceeds of the 5.875% Notes offering to fund the redemption of the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2020. For additional information see Redemption of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2020 below.

The 5.875% Notes are senior unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of payment with any of the current and future senior unsecured indebtedness of Covanta Holding Corporation. The 5.875% Notes rank junior to our existing and future secured indebtedness, including any guarantee of indebtedness under the Credit Facilities. The 5.875% Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

The 5.875% Notes are subject to redemption at our option, at any time on or after July 1, 2020, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the prospectus supplement, plus accrued and unpaid interest. At any time prior to July 1, 2020, we may redeem up to 35% of the original principal amount of the 5.875% Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.875% of the principal amount of the 5.875% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. At any time prior to July 1, 2020, we may also redeem the 5.875% Notes, in whole but not in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 5.875% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and a “make-whole premium.” The occurrence of specific kinds of changes in control will be a triggering event requiring us to offer to purchase from the holders all or a portion of the 5.875% Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, certain asset dispositions would be triggering events that may require us to use the proceeds from those asset dispositions to make an offer to purchase the 5.875% Notes at 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase if such proceeds are not otherwise used within 365 days to repay indebtedness or to invest or commit to invest such proceeds in additional assets related to our business or capital stock of a restricted subsidiary.

~~Union County EfW Capital Lease Arrangement~~

Table of Contents

~~In June 2016,~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

Redemption of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2020 (7.25% Senior Notes)

On April 3, 2017, we ~~extended the lease term related to the Union County EfW facility through 2053, which resulted in capital lease treatment for the revised lease. We recorded lease liability~~redeemed our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2020 using a portion of $104 million, calculated utilizing an incremental borrowing rate of 5.0%. The lease includes certain periods of contingent rentals based upon plant performance as either a share of revenue or a share of plant profits. These contingent payments have been excludednet proceeds from the ~~calculation~~issuance of the ~~lease liability~~5.875% Senior Notes due 2025 and ~~instead will be treated~~borrowings under our credit facility. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, as a ~~period expense when incurred. As~~result of ~~September 30, 2016,~~ the ~~outstanding borrowings under~~redemption, we recorded a prepayment charge of $9 million and a write-off of the ~~capital lease have mandatory amortization payments~~ remaining deferred financing costs of $4 million recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as ~~follows (in millions):~~

Remainder of 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter
Annual Remaining Amortization $ 2
$ 5
$ 5
$ 5
$ 6
$ 78
a loss on extinguishment of debt.

Other Non-current Liabilities

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Dublin convertible preferred instrument of ~~$91~~$97 million (€85 million) was included ~~in other~~as a component of "Other noncurrent ~~liabilities~~liabilities" in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Capitalized Interest

Interest expense paid and costs amortized to interest expense related to project financing are capitalized during the construction and start-up phase of the project. Total interest expense capitalized was $7 million and $2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $20 million and $4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Capitalized interest	$	12	$	7	$	20	$	13

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)~~

NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES

We have record our interim tax provision based upon our estimated annual effective tax rate ("~~ETR"~~EAETR") and account for tax effects of discrete events in the period in which they occur. We review the ~~ETR~~EAETR on a quarterly basis as projections are revised and laws are enacted. The ~~ETRs were (50)%~~effective tax rate ("ETR") was 4% and ~~48%~~9% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily attributable to ~~the gain from the sale of ownership interests in China, which was tax effected discretely as it was deemed unusual and infrequent. In addition, the~~ changes in the mix of earnings and the ~~change from forecasted pre-tax income~~discrete tax adjustments attributable to non-qualified stock options which expired in ~~2015 to forecasted pre-tax loss~~the six months ended June 30, 2017 and changes in ~~2016 also contributed to~~ the ~~ETR change.~~

reserve for uncertain tax positions.

NOTE 8. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Pass through costs

Pass through costs are costs for which we receive a direct contractually committed reimbursement from the municipal client which sponsors an energy-from-waste project. These costs generally include utility charges, insurance premiums, ash residue transportation and disposal, and certain chemical costs. These costs are recorded net of municipal client reimbursements in our condensed consolidated financial statements. ~~Total pass~~

Pass through costs were ~~$9 million~~as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Pass through costs	$	13	$	9	$	23	$	19

Insurance Recoveries

Plymouth Energy-from-Waste Facility

In May 2016, our Plymouth energy-from-waste facility experienced a turbine generator failure. Damage to the turbine generator was extensive and ~~$13 million~~operations at the facility were suspended promptly to assess the cause and extent of damage. The facility is capable of processing waste without utilizing the turbine generator to generate electricity, and we resumed waste processing operations in early June of 2016. The facility resumed generating electricity early in the first quarter of 2017 after the generator and other damaged equipment were replaced.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

Fairfax County Energy-from-Waste Facility

In February 2017, our Fairfax County energy-from-waste facility located in Lorton, Virginia experienced a fire in the front-end receiving portion of the facility. During the first quarter of 2017, we completed our evaluation of the impact of this event and recorded an immaterial asset impairment, which we have since recovered from insurance proceeds. We expect the facility to resume operations in the fourth quarter of 2017. We expect receipt of insurance recoveries for both property loss and business interruption to continue through the balance of 2017 and into the first half of 2018. The overall impact of the fire, net of insurance, on financial results in 2017 will be impacted by the timing of receipt of insurance recoveries.

The cost of repair or replacement and business interruption losses for the above matters are insured under the terms of applicable insurance policies, subject to deductibles.We recorded insurance recoveries, as a reduction to Other operating expense, net, in our consolidation statement of operations as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Insurance recoveries for property costs, net of impairment charges	$	3	$	—	$	3	$	—
Insurance recoveries for business interruption and clean-up costs, net of costs incurred	$	17	$	—	$	18	$	—

Impairment charges

We are party to a joint venture that was formed to recover and recycle metals from EfW ash monofills in North America. During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, due to operational difficulties and ~~2015, respectively, and $28~~the decline in the scrap metals market, a valuation of the entity was conducted. As a result, we recorded a net impairment of our investment in this joint venture of $3 million, ~~and $34 million for~~pre-tax, which represents our portion of the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~

~~Impairment charges~~carrying value of the entity in excess of the fair value. Such amount was calculated based on the estimated liquidation value of the tangible equipment utilizing Level 3 inputs. For more information regarding fair value measurements, see Note 10. Financial Instruments.

~~During the nine months ended September 30,~~In March 2016, we ~~recorded non-cash impairment charges of $19 million, pre-tax, of which $13 million, related to~~exercised an early termination option available under the ~~previously planned closure of~~steam sale agreement at our Pittsfield EfW facility ~~and $3 million, pre-tax, related~~that would have been effective in March 2017. Upon termination of the steam agreement, we intended to ~~our Tartech investment. See~~ ~~Note 3. Dispositions and Other~~ ~~for additional information.~~

~~During~~cease operations at the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2015, we identified indicators of impairment associated with our biomass facilities, primarily due to a decline in energy market pricing.~~Pittsfield facility. As a result, ~~of these developments,~~during the six months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of ~~$24~~$13 million, pre-tax, which was calculated based on ~~a range of potential outcomes utilizing various~~the estimated cash flows for ~~these facilities~~this facility during its remaining operations utilizing Level 3 inputs. For more information regarding fair value measurements, see Note 10. Financial Instruments. In October 2016, we withdrew our termination notice. The City of Pittsfield has agreed to fund upgrades to the facility and the State of Massachusetts will provide energy tax credits, both of which will serve to improve the economics of the facility. In addition, we will continue to sell steam generated by the facility under an amended agreement.

NOTE 9. STOCK-BASED ~~COMPENSATION~~AWARD PLANS

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017 we awarded certain employees grants of ~~748,569~~802,613 shares of restricted stock and ~~437,275~~77,541 restricted stock units ("RSUs"). The restricted stock awards and RSUs will be expensed over the requisite service ~~period, subject to an assumed 12% average forfeiture rate.~~period. The terms of the restricted stock awards and the RSUs include vesting provisions based solely on continued service. If the service criteria are satisfied, the restricted stock awards and RSUs will generally vest during March of ~~2017,~~ 2018, 2019, and ~~2019.~~2020.

Additionally, during the ~~nine~~six, months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we awarded certain employees grants of ~~390,728~~440,070 performance based RSUs that will vest based upon the Company’s cumulative Free Cash Flow per share over a three year performance period.

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we withheld 210,169 shares of our common stock in connection with tax withholdings for vested stock awards.~~

On May ~~5, 2016,~~4, 2017, we awarded ~~9,000~~14,286 shares of restricted stock and ~~54,591 restricted stock units~~82,144 RSUs for annual director compensation. Additionally, on June 15, 2017, we awarded 4,701 shares of RSUs for quarterly director fees for certain of our directors who elected to receive RSUs in lieu of cash payments. We determined the service vesting condition of these restricted stock awards and restricted stock units to be non-substantive and, in accordance with accounting principles for stock compensation, recorded the entire fair value of the awards as compensation expense on the grant date.

On September 22, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed two new board members. We awarded 5,550 restricted stock units for the prorated portion of their annual director compensation. We determined the service vesting condition of these restricted stock awards and restricted stock units to be non-substantive and, in accordance with accounting principles for stock compensation, recorded the entire fair value of the awards as compensation expense on the grant date.

Compensation expense related to our stock-based awards totaled $4 million and $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $13 million and $15 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The stock-based award compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included expense recognized for stock awards and accelerated vesting of stock awards pursuant to separation agreements in connection with the departure of two executive offers during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

1516

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we withheld 235,066 shares of our common stock in connection with tax withholdings for vested stock awards.

Compensation expense related to our stock-based awards was as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Share based compensation expense	$	6	$	4	$	11	$	9

Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense and weighted-average years to be recognized are as follows (in millions, except for weighted average years):


	As of September 30, 2016		As of June 30, 2017
	Unrecognized stock- based compensation	Weighted-average years to be recognized	Unrecognized stock- based compensation	Weighted-average years to be recognized
Restricted stock awards	$ 9	1.5	$ 14	1.6
Restricted stock units	$ 9	2.3	$ 13	2.1

NOTE 10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Measurements

Authoritative guidance associated with fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value, giving the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs), then significant other observable inputs (Level 2 inputs) and the lowest priority to significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

For cash and cash equivalents, restricted funds, ~~and~~ marketable securities and accounts receivable, the carrying value of these amounts is a reasonable estimate of their fair value. The fair value of restricted funds held in trust is based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the trustee.

Fair values for long-term debt and project debt are determined using quoted market ~~prices.~~prices (Level 1).

The fair value for interest rate swaps ~~were~~was determined by obtaining quotes from two counterparties (one is a holder of the long position and the other is in the short) and extrapolating those across the long and short notional amounts. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was adjusted to reflect counterparty risk of non-performance, and was based on the counterparty’s credit spread in the credit derivatives market.

The fair values of our energy hedges were determined using the spread between our fixed price and the forward curve information available within the market.

The fair value of our foreign currency hedge was determined by obtaining quotes from two counterparties and is based on market accepted option pricing methodology which utilizes inputs such as the currency spot rate as of the balance sheet date, the strike price of the options and volatility.

The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we would realize in a current market exchange. The ~~fair-value~~fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to us as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

1617

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

The following table presents information about the fair value measurement of our assets and liabilities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015:~~2016:


		As of
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:	Fair Value Measurement Level	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		Fair Value Measurement Level	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
		(In millions)					(In millions)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Bank deposits and certificates of deposit	1	$	109	$	89	1	$	44	$	79
Money market funds	1	4		5		1	4		5
Total cash and cash equivalents:		113		94			48		84
Restricted funds held in trust:
Bank deposits and certificates of deposit	1	18		9		1	17		12
Money market funds	1	38		66		1	30		36
U.S. Treasury/Agency obligations ⁽¹⁾	1	15		18		1	10		14
State and municipal obligations	1	46		59		1	36		46
Commercial paper/Guaranteed investment contracts/Repurchase agreements	1	2		8		1	12		2
Total restricted funds held in trust:		119		160			105		110
Investments:
Mutual and bond funds ⁽²⁾	1	2		2
Derivative asset — Energy hedges	2	11		21
Investments — mutual and bond funds⁽²⁾						1	2		2
Derivative asset — energy hedges ⁽³⁾						2	4		3
Total assets:		$	245	$	277		$	159	$	199
Liabilities:
Derivative liability — Interest rate swaps	2	$	27	$	14
Derivative liability — energy hedges ⁽⁴⁾						2	$	—	$	1
Derivative liability — interest rate swaps ^{(4), (5)}						2	$	18	$	20
Total liabilities:		$	27	$	14		$	18	$	21

The following financial instruments are recorded at their carrying amount (in millions):


	As of September 30, 2016				As of December 31, 2015				As of June 30, 2017				As of December 31, 2016
Financial Instruments Recorded at Carrying Amount:	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Accounts receivable ⁽³⁾⁽⁶⁾	$	300	$	300	$	314	$	314	$	303	$	303	$	333	$	333
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	2,295	$	2,341	$	2,263	$	2,244	$	2,378	$	2,375	$	2,252	$	2,237
Project debt	$	404	$	412	$	175	$	183	$	458	$	464	$	383	$	387


(1)	The U.S. Treasury/Agency obligations in restricted funds held in trust are primarily comprised of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation securities at fair value.


(2)	Included in other noncurrent assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(4)	Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(5)	Included in other noncurrent liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(6)	Includes $1 ~~million and $2~~ million of noncurrent receivables recorded in "Other assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively.~~2016.

In addition to the recurring fair value measurements, certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis when an indication of impairment is identified and the asset's fair value is determined to be less than its carrying value. See Note 8. Supplementary Information- Impairment charges for additional information.

1718

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

NOTE 11. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The following disclosures summarize ~~the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and~~ the effect of changes in fair value related to those derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations (in millions):

Derivative Instruments Not Designated
As Hedging Instruments
Fair Value as of
Balance Sheet Location September 30,
2016 December 31,
2015
Asset Derivatives:
Foreign currency Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ —
$ 6


			Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized In Income on Derivatives												Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized In Income on Derivatives
Effect on Income of Derivative Instruments Not Designated As Hedging Instruments		Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,						Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
			2016			2015		2016			2015				2017		2016		2017		2016
Foreign currency		Other income (expense), net	$	(1	)	$	3	$	(2	)	$	3		Other income (expense), net	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	(1	)
Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments	Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	(1	)	$	3	$	(2	)	$	3	Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	—	$	3	$	—	$	(1	)

Foreign Exchange Risk

InDuring 2016, in order to hedge the risk of adverse foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations impacting the ~~expected~~ sale proceeds from our equity transfer agreement in China (See Note 3. ~~Dispositions~~Acquisitions and ~~Other~~Dispositions), we entered into foreign currency exchange forwards with two financial institutions, covering approximately $100 million of notional, to protect against ~~further~~ rate fluctuations pending the ~~expected~~ close of the sale of our ownership interest to CITIC. The foreign currency forwards were accounted for as derivative instruments and, accordingly, were recorded at fair value quarterly with any change in fair value recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as "Other expense, net." During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, cash provided by foreign currency exchange settlements totaled $5 million and was included in net cash used in investing activities on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2016, we received $105 million of gross sale proceeds relating to the aforementioned sale of our ownership interests to CITIC and therefore, settled or canceled the remaining foreign currency exchange derivatives related to this hedged transaction, resulting in a current asset balance of zero. ~~The table below summarizes foreign currency derivatives that have settled or canceled to date (in millions):~~

Settled FX Derivatives
Instrument Notional Amount Maturity Settlement Received
FX Collar $50 March 2016 $2
FX Collar $50 April 2016 $1
FX Forward $50 June 2016 $—
FX Forward $50 July 2016 $1
FX Forward $50 September 2016 $1
FX Forward $49 September 2016 $—
FX Forward $49 September 2016 $—

~~We have also entered into foreign currency forwards to manage~~During the six months ended June 30, 2016, cash provided by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations associated with a series of fixed payments to be made by an international subsidiary through the end of 2017. This foreign currency forward is accounted for as a derivative instrument at fair valuesettlements totaled $3 million, and was included in ~~our quarterly condensed consolidated balance sheet with any changes~~net cash used in ~~fair value recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as "Other expense, net." This derivative instrument was not material to~~investing activities on our condensed consolidated statement of ~~operations nor was it material to our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)~~

cash flows.

Energy Price Risk

Following the expiration of certain long-term energy sales contracts, we may have exposure to market risk, and therefore revenue fluctuations, in energy markets. We have entered into contractual arrangements that will mitigate our exposure to short-term volatility through a variety of hedging techniques, and will continue to do so in the future. Our efforts in this regard will involve only mitigation of price volatility for the energy we produce, and will not involve taking positions (either long or short) on energy prices in excess of our physical generation. The amount of energy generation for which we have hedged on a forward basis under agreements with various financial institutions as of June 30, 2017 is indicated in the following table (in millions):


Calendar Year	Hedged MWh	Hedged MWh
2016	0.6
2017	2.2	1.4
2018	0.3	2.6
2019		0.1
Total	3.1	4.1

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the net fair value of the energy derivatives of ~~$11~~$4 million, pre-tax, was recorded as a $9$4 million current asset ~~and a $2 million noncurrent asset.~~on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The change in fair value was recorded as a component of AOCI. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not material. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, cash provided by and used in energy derivative settlements of ~~$26~~$12 million and zero, respectively, was included in net cash provided by operating activities on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, cash provided by and used in energy derivative settlements of ~~$11~~$22 million and ~~$7 million,~~zero, respectively, was included in the change in net cash provided by operating activities on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

Interest Rate Swaps

In order to hedge the risk of adverse variable interest rate fluctuations associated with the Dublin senior term loan, we have entered into floating to fixed rate swap agreements with various financial institutions terminating between ~~2016~~2017 and 2021, denominated in Euros, for the full €250 million loan amount. This interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge which is recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of AOCI. As of ~~September~~June 30, 2017, the fair value of the interest rate swap derivative of $18 million, pre-tax, was recorded as a $3 million and $15 million current and noncurrent liability, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the interest rate swap derivative of ~~$27~~$20 million, pre-tax, was recorded as a $2 million and ~~$25~~$18 million current and noncurrent liability, respectively. There was an immaterial amount of ineffectiveness ~~recorded during the quarter~~ recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as ~~interest expense.~~a component of "Interest expense, net" during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We and/or our subsidiaries are party to a number of claims, lawsuits and pending actions, most of which are routine and all of which are incidental to our business. We assess the likelihood of potential losses on an ongoing basis and when losses are considered probable and reasonably estimable, record as a loss an estimate of the outcome. If we can only estimate the range of a possible loss, an amount representing the low end of the range of possible outcomes is recorded. The final consequences of these proceedings are not presently determinable with certainty. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accruals for our loss contingencies were approximated $17 million and $11 million, respectively.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to environmental regulatory laws and environmental remediation laws. Although our operations are occasionally subject to proceedings and orders pertaining to emissions into the environment and other environmental violations, which may result in fines, penalties, damages or other sanctions, we believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations.

We may be identified, along with other entities, as being among parties potentially responsible for contribution to costs associated with the correction and remediation of environmental conditions at disposal sites subject to federal and/or analogous state laws. In certain instances, we may be exposed to joint and several liabilities for remedial action or damages. Our liability in connection with such environmental claims will depend on many factors, including our volumetric share of waste, the total cost of remediation, and the financial viability of other companies that also sent waste to a given site and, in the case of divested operations, the contractual arrangement with the purchaser of such operations.

The potential costs related to the matters described below and the possible impact on future operations are uncertain due in part to the complexity of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations, the varying costs and effectiveness of cleanup technologies, the uncertain level of insurance or other types of recovery and the questionable level of our responsibility. Although the ultimate outcome and expense of any litigation, including environmental remediation, is uncertain, we believe that the following proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)~~

Lower Passaic River Matter. In August 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) notified Covanta Essex Company (“Essex”) that it was a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for Superfund response actions in the Lower Passaic River Study Area, referred to as “LPRSA,” a 17 mile stretch of river in northern New Jersey. Essex’s LPRSA costs to date are not material to its financial position and results of operations; however, to date the EPA has not sought any LPRSA remedial costs or natural resource damages against PRPs. On March 3, 2016, the EPA released the Record of Decision (“ROD”) for its Focused Feasibility Study of the lower 8 miles of the LPRSA; the EPA’s selected remedy includes capping/dredging of sediment, institutional controls and long-term monitoring. The Essex facility started operating in 1990 and Essex does not believe there have been any releases to the LPRSA, but in any event believes any releases would have been de minimis considering the history of the LPRSA; however, it is not possible at this time to predict that outcome or to estimate the range of possible loss relating to Essex’s liability in the matter, including for LPRSA remedial costs and/or natural resource damages.

~~North Carolina Transformer Site Matter.~~ In December 2012, our subsidiary, Covanta Dade Power Corp. (“Dade”) received a letter from the EPA indicating Dade was named as a PRP, along with numerous other unidentified PRPs, relating to the cleanup of the Ward Transformer Superfund Site in Raleigh, North Carolina (“Ward Site”). Dade's alleged liability as a PRP stems from the 1994 servicing at the Ward Site of a transformer alleged to have contained PCB-contaminated oil. The EPA is seeking reimbursement from PRPs for its oversight costs in connection with ongoing cleanup activities at the Ward Site. While our investigation in this matter is continuing, based on information obtained to date, we believe Dade's responsibility, if any, in connection with this matter to be de minimis; and subject to indemnity by Veolia Environmental Services North America, LLC, from which we acquired Dade in 2010; however, it is not possible at this time to estimate the range of possible loss relating to Dade's ultimate liability, if any, in this matter.

Tulsa Matter. In January 2016, we were informed by the office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma (“U.S. Attorney”) that our subsidiary, Covanta Tulsa Renewable Energy LLC, is the target of a criminal investigation being conducted by the EPA. We understand that the EPA plans to allege improprieties in the recording and reporting of emissions data during an October 2013 incident involving one of the three municipal waste combustion units at our Tulsa, Oklahoma facility. We believe that our operations in Tulsa were and are in compliance with existing laws and regulations in all material respects. While we can provide no assurance as to the outcome of this matter, we do not believe that the investigation or any issues arising therefrom will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Other Matters

Durham-York Contractor Arbitration

We are seeking to resolve outstanding disputes with our primary contractor for the Durham-York construction project regarding (i) claims by the contractor for change orders and other expense reimbursement and (ii) claims by us for charges and liquidated damages for project completion delays. Our contract with this contractor contemplates binding arbitration to resolve these disputes, which we expect may conclude in 2017. While we do not expect resolution of these disputes to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, it could be material to our results of operations ~~and~~ and/or cash flows in any given accounting period.

China Indemnification Claims

Subsequent to completing the exchange of our project ownership interests in China for a 15% ownership interest in Sanfeng Environment, Sanfeng Environment made certain claims for indemnification under the agreement related to the condition of the facility in Taixing. For additional information, see Note 3. Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

Other Commitments

Other commitments as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 were as follows (in millions):


	Commitments Expiring by Period						Commitments Expiring by Period
	Total		Less Than One Year		More Than One Year		Total		Less Than One Year		More Than One Year
Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility	$	148	$	1	$	147	$	190	$	—	$	190
Letters of credit - other	65		—		65		67		—		67
Surety bonds	162		—		162		168		—		168
Total other commitments — net	$	375	$	1	$	374	$	425	$	—	$	425

The letters of credit were issued to secure our performance under various contractual undertakings related to our domestic and international projects or to secure obligations under our insurance program. Each letter of credit relating to a project is required to be maintained in effect for the period specified in related project contracts, and generally may be drawn if it is not renewed prior to expiration of that period.

We believe that we will be able to fully perform under our contracts to which these existing letters of credit relate, and that it is unlikely that letters of credit would be drawn because of a default of our performance obligations. If any of these letters of credit were to be drawn by the beneficiary, the amount drawn would be immediately repayable by us to the issuing bank. If we do not immediately repay such amounts drawn under letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility, unreimbursed amounts would be treated under the Credit Facilities as either additional term loans or as revolving loans.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)~~

The surety bonds listed in the table above relate primarily to construction and performance obligations and support for other obligations, including closure requirements of various energy projects when such projects cease operating. Were these bonds to be drawn upon, we would have a contractual obligation to indemnify the surety company.

We have certain contingent obligations related to the ~~7.25% Notes,~~ 6.375% Notes due 2022, 5.875% Notes due 2024, 5.875% Notes due 2025 and Tax-Exempt Bonds. Holders may require us to repurchase their ~~7.25% Notes,~~ 6.375% Notes due 2022, 5.875% Notes due 2024, 5.875% Notes due 2025 and Tax-Exempt Bonds if a fundamental change occurs. For specific criteria related to the redemption features of the 5.875% Notes ~~7.25%~~due 2025, see Note 6. Consolidated Debt. For specific criteria related to the redemption features of the 6.375% Notes ~~or 6.375%~~and 5.875% Notes due 2024, see Item 8. Financial Statements And Supplementary Data — Note 11. Consolidated Debt of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have issued or are party to guarantees and related contractual support obligations undertaken pursuant to agreements to construct and operate waste and energy facilities. For some projects, such performance guarantees include obligations to repay certain financial obligations if the project revenue is insufficient to do so, or to obtain or guarantee financing for a project. With respect to our businesses, we have issued guarantees to municipal clients and other parties that our subsidiaries will perform in accordance with contractual terms, including, where required, the payment of damages or other obligations. Additionally, damages payable under such guarantees for our energy-from-waste facilities could expose us to recourse liability on project debt. If we must perform under one or more of such guarantees, our liability for damages upon contract termination would be reduced by funds held in trust and proceeds from sales of the facilities securing the project debt and is presently not estimable. Depending upon the circumstances giving rise to such damages, the contractual terms of the applicable contracts, and the contract counterparty’s choice of remedy at the time a claim against a guarantee is made, the amounts owed pursuant to one or more of such guarantees could be greater than our then-available sources of funds. To date, we have not incurred material liabilities under such guarantees.

Benefit Obligations - Defined Contribution Plans

Substantially all of our employees in the United States are eligible to participate in defined contribution plans we sponsor. Our costs related to defined contribution plans were ~~$5 million and $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $13 million and $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Costs related to defined contribution plans	$	4	$	4	$	9	$	8

Dublin EfW Facility

In connection with the financing of the Dublin EfW facility, Covanta Energy has made commitments for contingent support as follows: (1) lending commitments up to €25 million to fund working capital shortfalls in the project company under certain

Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - (Continued)

circumstances during operations; and (2) up to €75 million commitment in the aggregate to provide support payments to the project company, under certain circumstances, in the event waste revenue falls below minimum levels (set far below anticipated levels).

~~Essex County EfW Facility~~

We are implementing significant operational improvements at our Essex County EfW facility at a total estimated cost of approximately $90 million. Construction commenced in 2014 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we have approximately $18 million of capital expenditures remaining to be incurred related to these improvements.

New York City Waste Transport and Disposal Contract

In 2013, New York City awarded us a contract to handle waste transport and disposal from two marine transfer stations located in Queens and Manhattan. Service for the Manhattan marine transfer station is expected pending approval from New York City. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we expect to incur approximately ~~$32~~$33 million of additional capital expenditures, primarily for transportation equipment.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ("MD&A")

The following MD&A is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of Covanta Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries; ("Covanta" or the "Company") for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The term "Covanta Energy" refers to our subsidiary Covanta Energy, LLC and its subsidiaries. The financial information as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 contained in our ~~2015~~2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Factors Affecting Business Conditions and Financial Results

The following are various published pricing indices relating to the U.S. economic drivers that are relevant to those aspects of our business where we have market exposure; however, there is not an exact correlation between our results and changes in these metrics.


	September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Consumer Price Index ⁽¹⁾	1.5		%	—		%	1.6		%	1.0		%
PJM Pricing (Electricity) ⁽²⁾	$	27.90		$	28.03		$	27.73		$	22.64
NE ISO Pricing (Electricity)⁽³⁾	$	31.76		$	29.22		$	27.34		$	23.49
Henry Hub Pricing (Natural Gas) ⁽⁴⁾	$	2.88		$	2.74		$	3.08		$	2.14
#1 HMS Pricing (Ferrous Metals) ⁽⁵⁾	$	212		$	219		$	263		$	220
Scrap Metals - Old Sheet & Old Cast ⁽⁶⁾	$	0.58		$	0.60		$	0.63		$	0.58


(1)	Represents the year-over-year percent change in the Headline CPI number. The Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) data is provided by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics.


(2)	Average price per MWh for ~~Q3 2016~~Q2 2017 and ~~Q3 2015.~~Q2 2016. Pricing for the PJM PSEG Zone is provided by the PJM ISO.


(3)	Average price per MWh for ~~Q3 2016~~Q2 2017 and ~~Q3 2015.~~Q2 2016. Pricing for the Mass Hub Zone is provided by the NE ISO.


(4)	Average price per MMBtu for ~~Q3 2016~~Q2 2017 and ~~Q3 2015.~~Q2 2016. The Henry Hub Pricing data is provided by the Natural Gas Weekly Update, U.S. Energy Information ~~Administration, Washington, DC. Nebraska Energy Office, Lincoln, NE.~~Administration.


(5)	Average price per gross ton for ~~Q3 2016~~Q2 2017 and ~~Q3 2015.~~Q2 2016. The #1 Heavy Melt Steel ("HMS") composite index ($/gross ton) price isas published by American Metal Market.


(6)	Average price per pound for ~~Q3 2016~~Q2 2017 and ~~Q3 2015.~~Q2 2016. Calculated using the high ~~and low prices for Old Sheet &~~price of Old Cast Aluminum Scrap ~~Metals~~ ($/~~lb.)~~lb) as published by American Metal Market.

Seasonal - Our quarterly operating income (loss) within the same fiscal year typically differs substantially due to seasonal factors, primarily as a result of the timing of scheduled plant maintenance. We conduct scheduled maintenance periodically each year, which requires that individual boiler and/or turbine units temporarily cease operations. During these scheduled maintenance periods, we incur material repair and maintenance expense and receive less revenue until the boiler and/or turbine units resume operations. This scheduled maintenance usually occurs during periods of off-peak electric demand and/or lower waste volumes, which are our first, second and fourth fiscal quarters. The scheduled maintenance period in the first half of the year (primarily first quarter and early second quarter) is typically the most extensive, while the third quarter scheduled maintenance period is the least extensive. Given these factors, we normally experience our lowest operating income from our projects during the first half of each year.

Our operating income (loss) may also be affected by seasonal weather extremes during summers and winters. Increased demand for electricity and natural gas during unusually hot or cold periods may affect certain operating expenses and may trigger material price increases for a portion of the electricity and steam we sell.

Quarter Updates

~~China Investments~~New Business Development

During ~~March 2016,~~the six months ended June 30, 2017, we ~~completed the exchange of our ownership interests~~acquired three environmental solutions businesses, in ~~China~~separate transactions, for a ~~15% ownership interest in Chongqing Sanfeng~~total of $17 million. These acquisitions further expand our Covanta Environmental ~~Industrial Group, Co., Ltd ("Sanfeng Environment") pursuant~~Solutions capabilities, including client service offerings and geographic reach.

In April 2017, we began utilizing our regional metals processing facility, located in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, to ~~agreements entered into~~process non-ferrous metal recovered at our EfW facilities. The non-ferrous metals are cleaned and separated by size and type for purposes of improving product quality to create a higher-valued recycled metal product and expanding our potential end markets.

Capital Allocation

Our key capital allocation activities through the six months ended June 30, 2017, included the following:

$66 million declared in ~~July 2015. During September 2016, we sold approximately 90%~~dividends to stockholders; and

$95 million for growth investments including $56 million towards construction of the aforementioned ownership interest in Sanfeng Environment to a subsidiary of CITIC Limited ("CITIC"), a leading Chinese industrial conglomerate and investment company, pursuant to the July 2015 agreements. As a result, during the three months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded pre-tax gain of $41 million. The gain results from pre-tax proceeds of $105 million in excess of the cost-method book value of $70 million, plus $5 million of realized gains on the related cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment.

~~Pittsfield EfW Facility~~

~~In March, we exercised an early termination option available under our steam sale agreement for our Pittsfield~~Dublin EfW facility, ~~that would have been effective in March 2017. Upon termination of the steam agreement, we intended~~$17 million to ~~cease operations at the Pittsfield facility. As a result, during the first quarter of 2016 we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $13~~acquire three environmental services businesses and $20 million ~~pre-tax,~~for various organic growth investments, which ~~was calculated based on the estimated cash flows for this facility during its remaining operations utilizing Level 3 inputs. Assumptions used in determining future operating results~~include metals recovery projects, investments related to our profiled waste and ~~cash flows include current~~environmental services businesses, and expected market conditions and future operations forecasts. It is possible that these assumptions and estimates may change resulting in the need to adjust our determination of fair value. For more information regarding fair value measurements, see ~~Note 10. Financial Instruments~~.

In October 2016, we withdrew our termination notice. The city agreed to fund upgrades to the facility and the state will provide energy tax credits, both of which will serve to improve the economics of the facility. In addition, we will continue to sell steam generated by the facility under an amended agreement.

~~Tartech Investment~~

We are party to a joint venture that was formed to recover and recycle metals from EfW ash monofills in North America. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, due to operational difficulties and the decline in the scrap metals market, a valuation of the entity was conducted. As a result, we recorded a net impairment of our investment in this joint venture of $3 million, pre-tax, which represents our portion of the fair value of entity in excess of the carrying value.continuous improvement projects.

Contract Extensions

In ~~September 2016,~~June 2017, we extended our ~~waste services~~ agreement with the ~~City of Huntsville~~Delaware County Solid Waste Authority to ~~September 2020.~~ process waste at our Delaware Valley EfW facility for an additional five years under terms similar to our existing contract.

In ~~October,~~February 2017, we extended our ~~waste disposal~~ agreement with the ~~City~~Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resource Recovery Authority for waste disposal at our Southeast Connecticut EfW facility for an additional four years, restructuring the new contract as a tip fee arrangement.

Fairfax County Energy-from-Waste Facility

In February 2017, our Fairfax County energy-from-waste facility located in Lorton, Virginia experienced a fire in the front-end receiving portion of ~~Indianapolis~~the facility. We expect the facility to ~~December 2025. Both were extended~~resume operations in the fourth quarter of 2017. The cost of repair or replacement and business interruption losses are insured under ~~similar~~the terms of applicable insurance policies, subject to deductibles. We expect receipt of insurance recoveries for both property loss and business interruption to continue through the ~~existing agreements.~~balance of 2017 and into the first half of 2018. The overall impact of the fire, net of insurance, on financial results in 2017 will be impacted by the timing of receipt of insurance recoveries. For additional information, see Item 1. Financial Statements - Note 8. Supplemental Information - Insurance Recoveries.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following general discussions should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this report. Additional detail relating to changes in operating revenue and operating expense and the quantification of specific factors affecting or causing such changes is provided in the segment discussion below. We have one reportable segment, North America, which is comprised of waste and energy services operations located primarily in the United States and Canada.

The comparability of the information provided below with respect to our revenue, expense and certain other items for the periods presented was affected by several factors. As outlined in Item 8. Financial Statements And Supplementary Data — Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Polices and Note 3. New Business and Asset Management of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our business development initiatives, contract transitions, and acquisitions resulted in various transactions that are reflected in comparative revenue and expense. These factors must be taken into account in developing meaningful comparisons between the periods compared below.

The following terms used within the Results of Operations discussion are defined as follows:

“~~Same store”~~Organic growth”: reflects the performance ~~at each facility~~of the business on a comparable period-over-period basis, excluding the impacts of ~~transitions~~transactions and ~~transactions.~~contract transitions.

“Transactions”: includes the impacts of acquisitions, divestitures, and the addition or loss of operating contracts.

Contract “transitions”: includes the impact of the expiration of: (a) long-term major waste and service contracts, most typically representing the transition to a new contract structure, and (b) long-term energy contracts.

~~“Transactions”: includes the impacts~~

Certain amounts in our Consolidated Results of ~~acquisitions, divestitures, and the addition or loss of operating contracts.~~Operations may not total due to rounding.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATING INCOME

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016


	Consolidated				North America				Variance Increase (Decrease)
Consolidated:															Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016		2015		2016		2015		Consolidated			North America			2017		2016		2017 vs 2016
	(In millions)														(In millions)
OPERATING REVENUE:
Waste and service revenue	$	299	$	283	$	299	$	282	$	16		$	17		$	310	$	297	$	12
Energy revenue	92		108		92		98		(16		)	(6		)	75		86		(11		)
Recycled metals revenue	14		16		14		16		(2		)	(2		)	15		17		(2		)
Other operating revenue	16		15		16		15		1			1			24		18		6
Total operating revenue	421		422		421		411		(1		)	10			424		418		6
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Plant operating expense	272		260		270		251		12			19			319		314		5
Other operating expense	14		18		14		18		(4		)	(4		)	2		19		(17		)
General and administrative expense	23		20		23		19		3			4			30		25		5
Depreciation and amortization expense	52		50		52		52		2			—			52		51		1
Impairment charges															1		4		(3		)
Total operating expense	361		348		359		340		13			19			404		413		(8		)
Operating income	$	60	$	74	$	62	$	71	$	(14	)	$	(9	)	$	20	$	5	$	14

~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016


	Consolidated				North America				Variance Increase (Decrease)
Consolidated:															Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016		2015		2016		2015		Consolidated			North America			2017			2016			2017 vs 2016
	(In millions)														(In millions)
OPERATING REVENUE:
Waste and service revenue	$	875	$	805	$	874	$	803	$	70		$	71		$	596		$	576		$	20
Energy revenue	279		319		273		292		(40		)	(19		)	161			187			(26		)
Recycled metals revenue	44		49		44		49		(5		)	(5		)	31			30			1
Other operating revenue	44		40		44		40		4			4			40			28			12
Total operating revenue	1,242		1,213		1,235		1,184		29			51			828			821			7
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Plant operating expense	901		849		892		825		52			67			651			629			22
Other operating expense	45		55		45		55		(10		)	(10		)	17			31			(14		)
General and administrative expense	71		71		69		67		—			2			58			48			10
Depreciation and amortization expense	155		148		155		147		7			8			104			103			1
Impairment charges	19		24		19		24		(5		)	(5		)	1			19			(18		)
Total operating expense	1,191		1,147		1,180		1,118		44			62			831			830			1
Operating income	$	51	$	66	$	55	$	66	$	(15	)	$	(11	)
Operating loss															$	(3	)	$	(9	)	$	6

Operating Revenue

Waste and Service Revenue

Consolidated (in millions): Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Variance
Increase (Decrease)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Three Month
Nine Month
Waste and service revenue unrelated to project debt $ 297

$ 280

$ 868

$ 795

$ 17

$ 73
Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt - principal 1

2

4

8

(1 )
(4 )
Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt - interest 1

1

3

2

—

1
Total waste and service revenue $ 299

$ 283

$ 875

$ 805

16

70



Consolidated (in millions):	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2017			2016			2017			2016			Three Month			Six Month
EfW waste processing & handling	$	242		$	238		$	473		$	465		$	4		$	8
Environmental services	30			25			58			46			$	5		12
Municipal services	52			49			96			92			$	3		4
Other revenue	10			9			18			18			$	1		—
Intercompany	(25		)	(24		)	(48		)	(45		)	$	(1	)	(3		)
Total waste and service revenue	$	310		$	297		$	596		$	576		$	12		20


North America segment - EfW facilities - Tons ⁽¹⁾ (in millions):	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Variance Increase (Decrease)			Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,		Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016	2015	2016	2015	Three Month	Nine Month		2017	2016	2017	2016	Three Month		Six Month
Contracted	4.6	4.4	13.0	12.7	0.2	0.3		4.3	4.4	8.3	8.5	(0.1	)	(0.2	)
Uncontracted	0.5	0.5	1.6	1.7	—	(0.1	)	0.5	0.5	1.0	1.1	—		—
Total tons	5.1	4.9	14.6	14.4	0.2	0.2		4.8	4.9	9.4	9.6	(0.1	)	(0.2	)

(1) Includes solid tons only. Does not include contribution from China investments. Certain amounts may not total due to rounding.

Waste and service revenue increased by $12 million year-over-year, driven by $7 million of organic growth, $3 million due to transactions and $2 million due to service contract transitions. Within organic growth, EfW waste processing revenue increased $8 million due to higher average revenue per ton, primarily from profiled waste growth and environmental services revenue increased $3 million which was partially offset by a decrease in EfW waste processing revenue of $6 million from lower volume, primarily due to downtime at the Fairfax facility.

For the ~~three~~six month comparative period, waste and service revenue ~~on a consolidated and North America segment basis~~ increased by ~~$16 million and $17 million, respectively.~~

~~Waste and service revenue from EfW operations increased by $10~~$20 million year-over-year, ~~impacted~~driven by ~~the following:~~

~~Same store~~$15 million of organic growth, $3 million due to transactions and $2 million due to service contract transitions. Within organic growth, EfW waste processing revenue increased by $14 million, due to higher average revenue per ton primarily from profiled waste growth and environmental services revenue increased $8 million ~~or 3.4%, driven~~which was partially offset by $6a decrease in EfW waste processing revenue of $8 million ~~of price improvement and $2 million of~~from lower volume, ~~improvement;~~

~~Transaction activity increased revenue by $3 million; and~~

~~Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt decreased by $1 million.~~

~~Waste and service revenue from non-EfW operations in the North America segment increased by $7 million~~ primarily due to downtime at the ~~contribution from newly acquired environmental services businesses.~~

~~For the nine month comparative period, waste and service revenue on a consolidated and North America segment basis increased by $70 million and $71 million, respectively.~~

~~Waste and service revenue from EfW operations increased by $18 million year-over-year, impacted by the following:~~

~~Same store revenue increased by $18 million, or 2.5%, driven by $16 million of price improvement and $2 million of volume improvement;~~

~~Transaction activity increased revenue by $6 million;~~

~~Waste processing revenue decreased by $2 million as a result of contract transitions; and~~

~~Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt decreased by $4 million.~~

Waste and service revenue from non-EfW operations in the North America segment increased by $53 million primarily due to the contribution from newly acquired environmental services businesses and the New York City MTS contract.

Fairfax facility.

Energy Revenue

~~Energy revenue~~



Consolidated ⁽¹⁾ (in millions):	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2017		2016		2017		2016		Three Month			Six Month
EfW energy sales	$	64	$	76	$	141	$	159	$	(12	)	$	(18	)
EfW capacity	11		10		20		19		1			—
Other revenue	—		—		—		9		—			(9		)
Total energy revenue	$	75	$	86	$	161	$	187	(11		)	(26		)

(1) Covanta share only. EfW excludes contribution from China investments. Represents the sale of electricity and ~~MWh by contract status~~steam based upon output delivered and ~~facility type (in millions):~~capacity provided. Certain amounts may not total due to rounding.


Total EfW (in millions):																Three Months Ended June 30,										Variance Increase (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended September 30,															2017					2016					2017 vs 2016
	2016					2015					Variance Increase (Decrease)					Revenue ⁽¹⁾		Volume ^{(1) (2)}	% of Total Volume		Revenue ⁽¹⁾		Volume ^{(1) (2)}	% of Total Volume		Revenue			Volume
North America Segment:	Revenue ⁽¹⁾		Volume ^{(1) (2)}	% of Total Volume		Revenue ⁽¹⁾		Volume ^{(1) (2)}	% of Total Volume		Revenue			Volume
EfW
At Market	$	9	0.3	16	%	$	12	0.4	23	%						$	5	0.2	12	%	$	6	0.2	16	%
Contracted	65		0.8	53	%	59		0.8	47	%						51		0.6	41	%	63		0.9	55	%
Hedged	18		0.5	31	%	15		0.3	20	%						19		0.7	47	%	17		0.4	29	%
Total EfW	$	92	1.6	100	%	86		1.5	90	%	$	6		0.1		$	75	1.4	100	%	$	86	1.5	100	%	$	(11	)	(0.1	)
Biomass
At Market	$	—	—	—	%	$	2	0.1	5	%
Contracted	—		—	—	%	10		0.1	5	%
Hedged	—		—	—	%	—		—	—	%
Total Biomass	$	—	—	—	%	$	12	0.2	10	%	$	(12	)	(0.2	)
Total	$	92	1.6	100	%	$	98	1.7	100	%	$	(6	)	(0.1	)

(1) Covanta share only. EfW excludes contribution from China investments. Represents the sale of electricity and steam based upon output delivered and capacity provided.

(2) Steam converted to MWh at an assumed average rate of 11 klbs of steam / MWh.

Certain amounts may not total due to rounding.

For the three month comparative period, energy revenue ~~on a consolidated basis~~ decreased by ~~$16 million.~~

~~Energy revenue~~$11 million year-over-year. A favorable impact of $2 million from EfW ~~operations increased by $5~~energy pricing increases and $1 million ~~year-over-year driven by~~from waste and service contract transitions ~~which contributed $4~~was more than offset by an $8 million decline related to the expiration of certain long-term energy contracts and $7 million from lower production at EfW facilities, primarily due to ~~additional energy revenue sharing, and an increase in same store revenue of $1 million.~~

~~Energy revenue from non-EfW operations decreased by $21 million, representing~~downtime at the ~~contribution from biomass facilities and China operations in the prior year.~~Fairfax facility.

For the ~~nine~~six month comparative period, energy revenue ~~on a consolidated basis~~ decreased by ~~$40 million.~~

~~Energy revenue~~$26 million year-over-year. A favorable impact of $3million from EfW ~~operations increased~~energy pricing increases and $4 million from waste and service contract transitions was more than offset by a $15 million decline related to the expiration of certain long-term energy contracts, a $9 million decline related to transactions ($7 million resulting from the exchange of our ownership interest in a facility in China and $2 million related to economically dispatching biomass facilities, both in the first quarter of 2016), and $11 million ~~year-over-year driven by contract transitions, which contributed $17 milliondue to additional energy revenue sharing, partially offset by decreased same store revenue of $6 million,~~from lower production at EfW facilities, primarily due to ~~lower energy production.~~

~~Energy revenue from non-EfW operations decreased by $51 million, representing~~downtime at the ~~contribution from biomass facilities and China operations in the prior year.~~

Fairfax facility.

Recycled Metals Revenue

Recycled Metals Revenue by Type (in millions): Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30, Variance
Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 2016 2015 Three Month Nine Month
Ferrous Metal $ 8
$ 10
$ 27
$ 31
(2 ) (4 )
Non-Ferrous Metal 6
6
17
18
—
(1 )
Total $ 14
$ 16
$ 44
$ 49
(2 ) (5 )



	Three Months Ended,
Recycled Metals Revenue (in millions):	2017		2016
March 31,	$	16	$	13
June 30,	15		17
September 30,			14
December 31,			17
Total for the year ended December 31,	N/A		$	61

Tons Sold by Type (in thousands)⁽¹⁾

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30, Variance
Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 2016 2015 Three Month Nine Month
Ferrous Metal 72
90
235
251
(18 ) (16 )
Non-Ferrous Metal 10
9
27
24
1
3

~~(1) Covanta share only.~~



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Metal Revenue (in millions)				Tons Recovered (in thousands)		Tons Sold (in thousands) ⁽¹⁾
	2017		2016		2017	2016	2017	2016
Ferrous Metal	$	10	$	11	98	102	68	77
Non-Ferrous Metal	4		6		9	9	5	9
Total	$	15	$	17

Three Months Ended
Recycled Metals Revenue (in millions): 2016 2015 2014
March 31, $ 13
$ 16
$ 21
June 30, 17
17
25
September 30, 14
16
26
December 31, —
12
21
Total for the year ended December 31, N/A
$ 61
$ 93



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Metal Revenue (in millions)				Tons Recovered (in thousands)		Tons Sold (in thousands) ⁽¹⁾
	2017		2016		2017	2016	2017	2016
Ferrous Metal	$	21	$	19	193	197	128	163
Non-Ferrous Metal	10		11		18	16	14	17
Total	$	31	$	30

(1) Represents the portion of total volume that is equivalent to Covanta's share of revenue under applicable client revenue sharing arrangements.

For the three month comparative period, recycled metals revenue decreased by $2 million ~~on both a consolidated~~primarily due to lower volume of non-ferrous sales ($4 million) related to the centralized processing of non-ferrous material and ~~North America segment basis, primarily driven~~downtime at the Fairfax County facility, partially offset by ~~lower market prices.~~higher pricing for non-ferrous of $2 million.

For the ~~nine~~six month comparative period, recycled metals revenue ~~decreased~~increased $1 million primarily due higher pricing for ferrous material of $8 million, partially offset by lower ferrous volume of $6 million ~~on both a consolidated and North America segment basis, primarily driven by lower market prices.~~due to the timing of sales.

Other Operating Revenue

Other operating revenue increased $1by $6 million and $4$12 million ~~on a consolidated basis~~ for the three month and ~~nine~~six month comparative period, respectively, primarily due to higher construction revenue related to facility improvement projects at the Pinellas County EfW facility, partially offset by decreased revenue from the Durham-York project and Honolulu expansion project, which have been completed.revenue.

Operating Expense

Plant Operating Expense


North America segment (in millions):	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance Increase (Decrease)
Consolidated (in millions):													Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016		2015		2016		2015		Three Month		Nine Month		2017		2016		2017		2016		Three Month			Six Month
Plant Operating Expense:
Plant maintenance ⁽¹⁾	$	48	$	46	$	219	$	212	$	2	$	7	$	79	$	82	$	177	$	172	$	(4	)	$	5
All other	222		205		673		613		17		60		240		232		475		458		8			17
Plant operating expense	$	270	$	251	$	892	$	825	19		67		$	319	$	314	$	651	$	629	5			22


(1)	Plant maintenance costs include our internal maintenance team and non-facility employee costs for facility scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and repair expense.

~~For~~

Plant operating expenses increased by $5 million for the three month ~~comparative~~comparable period, ~~plant operating expense on a consolidated and North America segment basis increased by $12 million and $19 million, respectively.~~

~~Plant operating expense for EfW operations in our North America segment increased by $11 million,~~primarily driven by ~~higher plant maintenance expense ($4 million) related to plant outage activity~~escalation in ~~the quarter, escalation of other plant operating costs on a same store basis~~wages and benefits ($4 million), increased hauling and ~~higher expense resulting from transactions~~disposal ($32 million).

~~Plant operating expense for non-EfW operations in our North America segment increased by $8 million primarily due to newly acquired environmental services businesses~~, and other organic cost increases ($~~6 million) and higher incentive compensation ($9~~2 million), partially offset by ~~economically dispatching biomass facilities ($8 million).~~

~~Consolidated~~lower plant ~~operating expense reflect an additional $7~~maintenance of $4 million ~~decrease~~ due to the ~~exchange~~timing of ~~our ownership interests in a facility in China.~~

~~For the nine month comparative period, plant operating expense on a consolidated and North America segment basis increased by $52 million and $67 million, respectively.~~maintenance activity.

Plant operating ~~expense for EfW operations~~expenses increased by ~~$31~~$22 million ~~impacted~~for the six month comparable period, driven by ~~higher~~escalation in wages and benefits ($10 million), increased hauling and disposal ($2 million), other organic cost increases ($12 million), and increased plant maintenance ~~($14 million), primarily related to the timing and scope of scheduled maintenance performed, other higher same store costs~~expense ($5 ~~million), increased expense resulting from contract transitions ($6 million), and higher expense resulting from transactions ($6 million).~~

Plant operating expense for non-EfW operations in our North America segment increased by $36 million primarily due to newly acquired environmental services businesses ($28 million), the New York City MTS contract ($7 million), the start-up of our centralized metals processing facility ($4 million) and higher incentive compensation ($21 million), partially offset by ~~economically dispatching biomass facilities ($25 million).~~

~~Consolidated~~transactions which reduced plant operating ~~expense reflect an additional $15~~expenses by $6 million ~~decrease due to the exchange of ownership interests in~~on a ~~facility in China.~~net basis.

Other Operating Expense

Other operating ~~expense in our North America segment~~expenses decreased by $4$17 million and ~~$10~~$14 million for the three month and ~~nine~~six month ~~comparative~~comparable periods, respectively, primarily due to higher insurance recoveries which are recorded as a ~~result of the completion of construction projects at the Honolulu and Durham-York EfW facilities,~~contra expense, partially offset by higher construction ~~activity at the Pinellas County EfW facility.~~expenses.

General and Administrative Expense

Consolidated general and administrative ~~expense~~expenses increased ~~by $3 million~~ for ~~the~~ three month comparative period by $5 million primarily due to ~~higher incentive compensation.~~an increase in stock compensation expense and outside consulting costs for accounting services.

Consolidated general and administrative ~~expense was flat~~expenses increased for ~~the nine~~six month ~~period. An approximate $5~~comparative period by $10 million primarily due to an increase in ~~incentive~~stock compensation ~~was offset by decreased legal~~ expense and ~~expenses incurred in 2015 related to executive separation agreements.~~outside consulting costs for accounting services.

Impairment Charges

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, we recorded impairment charges totaling $19 million. In March 2016, we exercised an early termination option available under the steam sale agreement at our Pittsfield EfW facility that would have been effective on or about March 2017. Upon termination of the steam agreement, we intended to cease operations at the Pittsfield facility. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million, pre-tax, which was calculated based on the estimated cash flows for this facility during its remaining operations.

~~In June~~ 2016, due to operational difficulties and athe decline in the scrap ~~metal~~metals market, we recorded an impairment to our investment in the Tartech joint venture of $3 million, pre-tax, which represented our portion of the carrying value in excess of the fair value of the entity.

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we ~~identified indicators~~recorded an impairment charge related to the previously planned closure of ~~impairment associated with~~ our ~~biomass facilities, primarily due~~Pittsfield EfW facility. In March 2016, we exercised an early termination option available under the steam sale agreement at this facility that would have been effective on or about March 2017. Upon termination of the steam agreement, we intended to ~~a decline in energy market pricing.~~cease operations at this facility. As a result, ~~of these recent developments,~~ we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of ~~$24~~$13 million, pre-tax, which was calculated based on ~~a range of potential outcomes utilizing various~~the estimated cash flows for ~~these facilities.~~

~~Operating Income~~

~~Operating income decreased by $14 million on a consolidated basis~~this facility during its remaining operations. In October 2016, we withdrew our termination notice. The City of Pittsfield has agreed to fund upgrades to the facility and ~~decreased $9 million on a North America segment basis for~~ the ~~three month comparative period. Operating income was negatively impacted by lower recycled metal market prices and higher incentive compensation, offset~~State of Massachusetts will provide energy tax credits, both of which will serve to improve the economics of the facility. In addition, we will continue to sell steam generated by the ~~contribution of new businesses and, on a comparative basis, the profit reduction related to the Durham-York construction project that occurred in 2015.~~

Excluding the impairment charges discussed above, operating income decreased on a consolidated basis and North America segment basis by $20 million and $16 million, respectively, for the nine month comparative period. Operating income was negatively impacted by lower recycled metal market prices, higher EfW plant operating expense, largely due to the timing and scope of scheduled maintenance performed, and higher incentive compensation; offset by the contribution of new businesses, higher EfW waste and service pricing, lower general and administrative expense (excluding incentive compensation) due to executive separation expense incurred in 2015, and the construction profit reduction for the Durham-York project in 2015.facility under an amended agreement.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — NON-OPERATING INCOME ITEMS

Three and ~~Nine Month~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Other ~~Income (Expense):~~Expense:

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Variance
Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 2016 2015 Three Month Nine Month

Other income (expense):
Interest expense $ (35 ) $ (34 ) $ (103 ) $ (102 ) $ (1 ) $ (1 )
Gain on asset sales 43
—
43
—
43
43
Loss on extinguishment of debt —
—
—
(2 ) —
2
Other expense, net (1 ) —
(1 ) (1 ) (1 ) —
Total other income (expense) $ 7
$ (34 ) $ (61 ) $ (105 ) 41
44



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2017		2016			2017		2016		Three Month	Six Month
						(In millions)
Interest expense	35		34			$	71	$	68	1	$	3
Loss on asset sales	2		—			6		—		2	(6		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	13		—			13		—		13	(13		)
Other income, net	—		(2		)	—		—		2	—
Total other expense	$	50	$	32		$	90	$	68	18	22

~~During thenine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded a gain of $41 million~~The loss on asset sales is due to charges for indemnification claims related to the sale of our interests in ~~China and a $2 million gain on the sale of a transfer station.~~China. For additional information, see Item 1. Financial Statements - Note 3. Acquisitions and Dispositions. The loss on extinguishment of debt is attributable to the ~~sale~~redemption of our ~~China investments,~~7.25% Senior Notes due 2020 on April 3, 2017. As a result of the redemption, during the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a prepayment charge of approximately $9 million and a write-off of the remaining deferred financing costs of approximately $4 million. For additional information, see Item 1. Financial Statements - Note ~~3. Dispositions and Other~~6. Consolidated Debt..

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Variance Increase (Decrease)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			Three Month			Nine Month			2017			2016			2017			2016			Three Month			Six Month
							(In millions, except percentages)																		(In millions, except percentages)
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
Income tax (expense) benefit	$	(12	)	$	(11	)	$	(5	)	$	19		$	(1	)	$	(24	)	$	(8	)	$	(3	)	$	3		$	7		$	(5	)	$	(4	)
Effective income tax rate	17		%	29		%	(50		)%	48		%	N/A			N/A			24		%	14		%	4		%	9		%	N/A			N/A

~~During~~The difference between the~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, the change in~~ effective tax rate for June 30, 2017 and 2016 is primarily ~~resulted from the discrete impact of the sale of ownership interests in China,~~attributable to changes in the mix of earnings and the ~~change from forecasted pre-tax income~~discrete tax adjustments attributable to non-qualified stock options which expired in ~~2015 to forecasted pre-tax loss~~the six months ended June 30, 2017 and changes in ~~2016.~~the reserve for uncertain tax positions.

Net ~~Income (Loss)~~Loss Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation and ~~Income (Loss)~~Loss Per Share:

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Variance
Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 2016 2015 Three Month Nine Month
(In millions, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
Net income (loss) attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation $ 54
$ 34
$ (12 ) $ (9 ) $ 20
$ (3 )
Income (loss) per share attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation:
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic 129
132
129
132
(3 ) (3 )
Diluted 131
134
129
132
(3 ) (3 )
Income (Loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.42
$ 0.26
$ (0.09 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.16
$ (0.02 )
Diluted $ 0.42
$ 0.25
$ (0.09 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.17
$ (0.02 )

Cash dividend declared per share
$ 0.25
$ 0.25
$ 0.75
$ 0.75
$ —
$ —



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2017			2016			2017			2016			Three Month			Six Month
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation	$	(37	)	$	(29	)	$	(89	)	$	(66	)	$	(8	)	$	(23	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	130			129			129			129			1			—
Diluted	130			129			129			129			1			—
Loss per share attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation Stockholders:
Basic	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)
Diluted	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)

Cash dividend declared per share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.50		$	0.50		$	—		$	—

Supplementary Financial Information — Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“Adjusted EPS”) (Non-GAAP Discussion)

We use a number of different financial measures, both United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and non-GAAP, in assessing the overall performance of our business. To supplement our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use the measure of Adjusted EPS, which is a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EPS is not intended as a substitute or as an alternative to diluted earnings (loss) per share as an indicator of our performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our non-GAAP financial measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. We use the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EPS to enhance the usefulness of our financial information by providing a measure which management internally uses to assess and evaluate the overall performance and highlight trends in the ongoing business.

Adjusted EPS excludes certain income and expense items that are not representative of our ongoing business and operations, which are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share in accordance with GAAP. The following items are not all-inclusive, but are examples of reconciling items in prior comparative and future periods. They would include, ~~the results of operations of our insurance subsidiaries,~~ impairment charges, the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, significant gains or losses from the disposition or restructuring of businesses, gains and losses on assets held for sale, transaction-related costs, income and loss on the extinguishment of debt and other significant items that would not be representative of our ongoing business.

In order to provide a meaningful basis for comparison, we are providing information with respect to our Adjusted EPS for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, reconciled for each such period to diluted loss per share, which is believed to be the most directly comparable measure under GAAP (in millions, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Diluted income (loss) per share $ 0.42
$ 0.25
$ (0.09 ) $ (0.07 )
Reconciling items ^(a)
(0.24 ) (0.03 ) (0.14 ) 0.11
Adjusted EPS $ 0.18
$ 0.22
$ (0.23 ) $ 0.04


~~(a)~~	~~Additional information is provided in the Reconciling Items table below.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Reconciling Items 2016 2015 2016 2015
Impairment charges ^(a)
$ —
$ —
$ 19
$ 24
Gain on asset sales ^(b)
(43 ) —
(43 ) —
Severance and reorganization costs ^(c)
—
1
2
7
Loss on extinguishment of debt —
—
—
2
Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments 1
(3 ) 2
(3 )
Effect of foreign exchange gain on indebtedness —
1
(1 ) 2
Total reconciling items, pre-tax (42 ) (1 ) (21 ) 32
Pro forma income tax impact ^(d)
10
(4 ) 2
(18 )
Grantor trust activity 1
1
1
1
Total reconciling items, net of tax $ (31 ) $ (4 ) $ (18 ) $ 15
Diluted earnings per share impact $ (0.24 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.14 ) $ 0.11
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 131
134
129
132



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(0.51	)
Reconciling items ^(a)	0.06			0.01			0.10			0.10
Adjusted EPS	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.59	)	$	(0.41	)

(a) Additional information is provided in the Reconciling Items table below.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Reconciling Items	2017			2016			2017			2016
Impairment charges ^(a)	$	1		$	4		$	1		$	19
Loss on asset sales ^(b)	2			—			6			—
Severance and reorganization costs	1			1			1			2
Insurance recoveries	(3		)	—			(3		)	—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	13			—			13			—
Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments	—			(3		)	—			1
Effect of foreign exchange gain on indebtedness	(1		)	—			(1		)	(1		)
Total reconciling items, pre-tax	13			2			17			21
Pro forma income tax impact ^(c)	(5		)	(1		)	(5		)	(8		)
Grantor trust activity	—			—			1			—
Total reconciling items, net of tax	$	8		$	1		$	13		$	13
Diluted earnings per share impact	$	0.06		$	0.01		$	0.10		$	0.10
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding	130			129			129			129


(a)	During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016 we recorded a non-cash impairment totaling ~~$19~~$4 million, of which ~~$13 million related to the planned closure of our Pittsfield EfW facility in March 2017 and~~ $3 million related to an investment in a joint venture to recover and recycle metals.

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016, we recorded ana non-cash impairment ~~charge~~totaling $19 million of which $13 million related to the previously planned closure of our ~~biomass assets totaling $24 million.~~Pittsfield EfW facility in March 2017, which we now continue to operate.

See Results of Operations - Impairment charges discussion above.


(b)	During the three months and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, we recorded a ~~$41~~$2 million ~~gain on~~and $6 million charge, respectively, for indemnification claims related to the sale of our interests in ~~China. See~~ ~~Results of Operations - Non-operating Income Items - Other Income (Expense)~~ ~~discussion above.~~ China, which was completed in 2016.


(c)	For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, comprised of costs incurred in connection with separation agreements related to the departure of two executive officers, of which $4 million related to non-cash compensation.


~~(d)~~	We calculate the federal and state tax impact of each item using the statutory federal tax rate and applicable blended state rate.

Supplementary Financial Information — Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Discussion)

To supplement our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use the measure of Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by the SEC. This non-GAAP financial measure is described below, and is not intended as a substitute and should not be considered in isolation from measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our use of non-GAAP financial measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is intended to enhance the usefulness of our financial information by providing a measure which management internally uses to assess and evaluate the overall performance of its business and those of possible acquisition candidates, and highlight trends in the overall business.

We use Adjusted EBITDA to provide further information that is useful to an understanding of the financial covenants contained in the credit facilities of our most significant subsidiary, Covanta Energy, and as additional ways of viewing aspects of its operations that, when viewed with the GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of our core business. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is based on the definition in Covanta Energy’s Credit Facilities, which we have guaranteed. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for additional items subtracted from or added to net income. Because our business is substantially comprised of that of Covanta Energy, our financial performance is substantially similar to that of Covanta Energy. For this reason, and in order to avoid use of multiple financial measures which are not all from the same entity, the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and other financial measures presented herein are measured on a consolidated ~~basis for continuing operations, less the results of operations of our insurance subsidiaries.~~basis. Under the Credit Facilities, Covanta Energy is required to satisfy certain financial covenants, including certain ratios of which Adjusted EBITDA is an important component. Compliance with such financial covenants is expected to be the principal limiting factor which will affect our ability to engage in a broad range of activities in furtherance of our business, including making certain investments, acquiring businesses and incurring additional debt. Covanta Energy was in compliance with these covenants as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017. Failure to comply with such financial covenants could result in a default under the Credit Facilities, which default would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow provided by operating activities as indicators of our performance or liquidity or any other measures of performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP.

In order to provide a meaningful basis for comparison, we are providing information with respect to our Adjusted EBITDA for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, reconciled for each such period to net loss and cash flow provided by operating activities, which are believed to be the most directly comparable measures under GAAP. The following is a reconciliation of Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation	$	54		$	34	$	(12	)	$	(9	)
Net Loss Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation												$	(37	)	$	(29	)	$	(89	)	$	(66	)
Depreciation and amortization expense	52			50		155			148			52			51			104			103
Interest expense, net	35			34		103			102			35			34			71			68
Income tax expense (benefit)	12			11		5			(19		)	8			3			(3		)	(7		)
Impairment charges ^(a)	—			—		19			24			1			4			1			19
Gain on asset sales ^(b)	(43		)	—		(43		)	—
Loss on asset sales ^(a)												2			—			6			—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—		—			2			13			—			13			—
Insurance recoveries												(3		)	—			(3		)	—
Debt service billing in excess of revenue recognized	1			—		3			1			1			1			2			2
Severance and reorganization costs	1			1		3			3			1			1			1			2
Non-cash compensation expense ^(c)	4			4		13			15
Capital type expenditures at service fee operated facilities ^(d)	6			3		29			25
Other ^(e)	2			2		7			9
Non-cash compensation expense												6			4			11			9
Other non-cash items												1			—			3			3
Capital type expenditures at service fee operated facilities ^(b)												12			12			26			23
Other ^(c)												1			1			1			2
Total adjustments	70			105		294			310			130			111			233			224
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124		$	139	$	282		$	301		$	93		$	82		$	144		$	158


(a)	See Adjusted EPS ~~- Note (a)~~ ~~and~~ ~~Results of Operations - Impairment charges~~ ~~discussion above.~~


~~(b)~~	~~See~~ ~~Adjusted EPS - Note (b)~~ ~~and~~ ~~Results of Operations Non-operating Income Items - Other Income (Expense)~~ discussion above.


~~(c)~~	~~The nine months ended September 30, 2015 includes $4 million of costs incurred in connection with separation agreements related to the departure of two executive officers.~~


~~(d)~~(b)	Adjustment for impact of adoption of FASB ASC 853 - Service Concession Arrangements. These types of expenditures at our service fee operated facilities were historically capitalized prior to adoption of this accounting standard effective January 1, 2015.


~~(e)~~(c)	Includes certain other items that are added back under the definition of Adjusted EBITDA in Covanta Energy's credit agreement.

The following is a reconciliation of cash flow provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016		2015		2017		2016			2017		2016
Cash flow provided by operating activities	$	88	$	123		$	146	$	154	$	16	$	27		$	26	$	62
Capital type expenditures at service fee operated facilities ^(a)										12		12			26		23
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	24		22			91		83		41		45			67		67
Cash paid for taxes	3		2			7		6
Capital type expenditures at service fee operated facilities ^(a)	6		3			29		25
Cash paid for taxes, net										2		—			1		4
Adjustment for working capital and other	3		(11		)	9		33		22		(2		)	24		2
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124	$	139		$	282	$	301	$	93	$	82		$	144	$	158


(a)	See Adjusted EBITDA - Note ~~(d)~~(b).

For additional discussion related to management’s use of non-GAAP measures, see Liquidity and Capital Resources — Supplementary Financial Information — Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP Discussion) below.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, cash flow generated from our ongoing operations, and available capacity under our ~~credit facilities,~~Revolving Credit Facility, which we believe will ~~collectively~~ allow us to meet our liquidity needs. For additional information regarding our credit facilities and other debt, see Item 1. Financial Statements - Note 6. Consolidated Debt. We typically receive cash distributions from our North America segment projects on a monthly basis. Our primary future cash requirements will be to fund capital expenditures to maintain our existing businesses, service our debt, invest in the growth of our business, and return capital to our ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. We believe that our liquidity position and ongoing cash flow from operations will be sufficient to finance these requirements for at least the next twelve months.

In ~~2016,~~March 2017, we sold $400 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due July 2025. We utilized the net proceeds of the 5.875% Notes offering together with funds borrowed under our Credit Facilities, to redeem the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2020. For further information, see Item 1. Financial Statements - Note 6. Consolidated Debt.

We have substantial indebtedness, including approximately $650 million that will mature through 2020. We generally intend to refinance these instruments prior to maturity with like-kind financing in the bank and/or debt capital markets in order to maintain a capital structure comprised primarily of long-term debt, which we believe appropriately matches the long-term nature of our assets and contracts. The loan documentation governing the Credit Facilities contains various affirmative and negative covenants, as well as financial maintenance covenants (financial ratios), that limit our ability to engage in certain types of transactions. We were in compliance with all of the covenants under the Credit Facilities as of June 30, 2017. Further, we do not anticipate our existing debt covenants to restrict our ability to undertake additional financing. For additional information regarding the covenants under our Credit Facilities, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 11. Consolidated Debt of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In 2017, we expect to generate net cash from operating activities which ~~will~~may not alone meet ~~or exceed~~all of our cash requirements for both capital expenditures to maintain our existing assets and for ongoing dividends to ~~shareholders.~~stockholders, in which case we would utilize our Revolving Credit Facility on an interim basis. In addition, we expect our Dublin EfW facility to commence commercial operations in late 2017, after which we expect it to contribute meaningfully to our financial results. For a full discussion of the factors impacting our 2017 business outlook, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Business Outlook of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. We intend to utilize ~~existing cash balances and~~ debt financing as the primary means to fund investments in the growth of our business in ~~2016,~~2017, including our committed investments in the Dublin EfW facility (utilizing non-recourse project financing arranged in 2014), ~~the Essex County EfW facility (utilizing proceeds from the tax-exempt bond issuance completed in 2015),~~ and other growth investments (utilizing our borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility). In order to offset a portion of the indebtedness incurred to finance these investments in the growth of our business, as well as borrowings incurred to fund share repurchases completed in late 2015 and early 2016 (referenced above), we utilized approximately $50 million of the proceeds from the sale of our ownership interests in China to repay borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. For additional information regarding the financing arrangements referenced above, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 11. Consolidated Debt of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Beyond ~~2016,~~2017, we expect that our financial results will be affected by several factors, including: market prices, contract transitions, new contracts, rates of new business growth in our environmental services operations, acquisitions and other growth investments, continuous improvement initiatives, and our ability to manage facility production and operating costs. ~~In addition, we expect our Dublin EfW facility to commence commercial operations in late 2017, after which we expect it to contribute meaningfully to our financial results. In addition, under~~Under our capital allocation policy, we intend to use any excess cash flow from operations above the amount of ~~these on-going~~ongoing requirements for capital expenditures to maintain our existing assets and for ongoing dividends to stockholders either to invest in growth opportunities or to repay ~~indebtedness, and/or repurchase stock.~~indebtedness. If and as we identify attractive growth investment opportunities that exceed our expected cash flow from operations, we will continue to consider utilizing debt financing to the extent that it is available in the market on acceptable terms.

We have substantial indebtedness, including $1.1 billion that will mature through 2020. We generally intend to refinance these instruments prior to maturity with like-kind financing in the bank loan and/or debt capital markets in order to maintain a capital structure comprised primarily of long-term debt, which we believe appropriately matches the long-term nature of our assets and contracts.

~~For additional information regarding the covenants under our Credit Facilities, see~~ ~~Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 11. Consolidated Debt~~ ~~of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.~~

Other Factors Affecting Liquidity

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we held cash balances of ~~$113~~$48 million, of which ~~$95~~$45 million ~~were~~was held by international subsidiaries and not generally available for near-term liquidity in our domestic operations. AsIn addition, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had restricted cash of ~~$119~~$105 million, of which ~~$16~~$13 million was designated for future payment of project debt principal. Restricted funds held in trust are primarily amounts received and held by third-party trustees relating to certain projects we own. We generally do not control these accounts and these funds may be used only for specified purposes.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had unused ~~and available~~ capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility of ~~$468~~$335 million and were in compliance with all of the covenants under our Credit Facilities. For additional information regarding the Credit Facilities, see Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 6. Consolidated Debt.

During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, dividends declared to stockholders were $33 million, or $0.25 per share. Such amounts were paid in ~~October 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we repurchased 1.2 million shares of our common stock at a weighted average cost of $15.29 for an aggregate amount of $18 million.~~July 2017. We ~~expect to~~may repurchase outstanding shares from time to time, the amount and timing of future repurchases may vary depending on market conditions and the level of operating, financing and other investing activities. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the amount remaining under our currently authorized share repurchase program was $66 million.

Our projected contractual obligations are consistent with amounts disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. For additional information regarding the ~~Union County EfW Capital Lease,~~5.875% Notes due 2025 and the 7.25% Notes due 2020, see Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 6. Consolidated ~~Debt,~~Debt. ~~for~~For additional information on other commitments, see Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies - Other Matters.

Sources and Uses of Cash Flow for the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015:~~2016:

Net cash provided by operating activities for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$146~~$26 million, a decrease of $8$36 million from the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to ~~an increase in~~ the ~~Net loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation~~operating performance as discussed ~~above in our~~ ~~Results of Operations.~~ ~~Net Loss Attributable to Covanta Holdings Corporation is adjusted for reconciling items.~~above. The reconciling items were driven by the $43 million gain on the sale of assets, primarily due to the sale of our interests in China, which was offset by a $25 million decrease in the adjustment for deferred income taxes, primarily attributable to the sale of our interests in China and changes to our current and deferred allocation approach for interim periodsunfavorable contribution from working capital as compared to prior ~~year.~~year was primarily due to payment of bonus compensation in the first half of 2017 which was absent in the first half of 2016, partially offset by higher collections of accounts receivables.

Net cash used in investing activities for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$178~~$166 million, a net decrease of ~~$159~~$25 million from the prior year period. The net decrease in cash used was principally attributable to ~~proceeds related to the sale of interests in China of $105 million and~~ reduced ~~acquisition spending of $61 million, offset by increased~~ purchases of property, plant and equipment ~~totaling $15~~of $32 million, ~~primarily due to increased capitalized maintenance.~~including a lower rate of spend for construction of the Dublin EfW facility in the quarter, offset by an increase in acquisition spending of $7 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$48~~$101 million, a net decrease of ~~$119~~$38 million from the prior period. The decrease was ~~primarily~~ attributable to lower net borrowings under the revolving credit facility of ~~$111~~$13 million, lower proceeds from our Dublin financing arrangement of $17 million and ~~repurchases~~increased net repayments of ~~common stock totaling $20~~long-term debt of $12 million ~~during~~as compared to the prior year period.

Supplementary Financial Information — Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP Discussion)

To supplement our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use the measure of Free Cash Flow, which is a non-GAAP measure as defined by the SEC. This non-GAAP financial measure is not intended as a substitute and should not be considered in isolation from measures of liquidity prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our use of Free Cash Flow may be different from similarly identified non-GAAP measures used by other companies, limiting its usefulness for comparison purposes. The presentation of Free Cash Flow is intended to enhance the usefulness of our financial information by providing measures which management internally uses to assess and evaluate the overall performance of its business and those of possible acquisition candidates, and highlight trends in the overall business.

We use the non-GAAP financial measure of Free Cash Flow as a criterion of liquidity and performance-based components of employee compensation. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash flow provided by operating activities, ~~excluding the cash flow provided by or used in our insurance subsidiaries,~~ less maintenance capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures primarily to maintain our existing facilities. We use Free Cash Flow as a measure of liquidity to determine amounts we can reinvest in our core businesses, such as amounts available to make acquisitions, invest in construction of new projects, make principal payments on debt, or return capital to our stockholders through dividends and/or stock repurchases. For additional discussion related to management’s use of non-GAAP measures, see Consolidated Results of Operations — Supplementary Financial Information — Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP Discussion) above.

In order to provide a meaningful basis for comparison, we are providing information with respect to our Free Cash Flow for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, reconciled for each such period to cash flow provided by operating activities, which we believe to be the most directly comparable measure under GAAP.

The following is a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow and its primary uses (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Cash flow provided by operating activities	$	88		$	123		$	146		$	154
Net cash provided by operating activities													$	16		$	27		$	26		$	62
Less: Maintenance capital expenditures ^(a)	(14		)	(16		)	(82		)	(71		)	(37		)	(32		)	(64		)	(68		)
Free Cash Flow	$	74		$	107		$	64		$	83		$	(21	)	$	(5	)	$	(38	)	$	(6	)
Uses of Free Cash Flow
Investments:
Growth investments ^(b)	$	(84	)	$	(78	)	$	(209	)	$	(266	)	$	(45	)	$	(66	)	$	(95	)	$	(125	)
Property insurance proceeds													3			—			5			—
Capital expenditures associated with property insurance events													(8		)	—			(9		)	—
Other investing activities, net	6			—			8			—			(2		)	2			(3		)	2
Total investments	$	(78	)	$	(78	)	$	(199	)	$	(266	)	$	(52	)	$	(64	)	$	(102	)	$	(123	)
Return of capital to stockholders:
Cash dividends paid to stockholders	$	(33	)	$	(34	)	$	(98	)	$	(100	)	$	(32	)	$	(32	)	$	(65	)	$	(65	)
Common stock repurchased	—			—			(20		)	—			—			—			—			(20		)
Total return of capital to stockholders	$	(33	)	$	(34	)	$	(118	)	$	(100	)	$	(32	)	$	(32	)	$	(65	)	$	(85	)
Capital raising activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of corporate debt ^(c)	$	—		$	96		$	—		$	98		$	—		$	—		$	393		$	—
Net proceeds from issuance of project debt^(d)	—			—			—			15
Proceeds from Dublin financing	62			40			139			85			27			40			60			77
Net proceeds from equipment financing leases ^(e)	—			—			—			15
Change in restricted funds held in trust	4			(53		)	17			(64		)	(4		)	3			—			13
Other financing activities, net	(3		)	(5		)	—			—			8			(2		)	4			(1		)
Deferred financing costs	(2		)	(2		)	(5		)	(5		)	(1		)	—			(2		)	(3		)
Proceeds from sale of China assets	105			—			105			—
Net proceeds from capital raising activities	$	166		$	76		$	256		$	144		$	30		$	41		$	455		$	86
Debt repayments:
Net cash used for scheduled principal payments on corporate debt	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(2	)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(2	)	$	(1	)
Net cash used for scheduled principal payments on project debt ^(f)	(11		)	(9		)	(15		)	(19		)
Net cash used for scheduled principal payments on project debt ^(d)													—			—			(7		)	(4		)
Voluntary prepayment of corporate debt													(410		)	—			(410		)	—
Payments on equipment financing leases ^(e)	(1		)	(1		)	(3		)	(3		)	(1		)	(1		)	(2		)	(2		)
Total debt repayments	$	(13	)	$	(10	)	$	(20	)	$	(23	)	$	(412	)	$	(2	)	$	(421	)	$	(7	)
Borrowing activities - Revolving credit facility, net	$	(110	)	$	(60	)	$	35		$	146		$	89		$	64		$	132		$	145
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	1		$	(4	)	$	2		$	—		$	3		$	2
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	5		$	—		$	19		$	(20	)	$	(396	)	$	2		$	(36	)	$	12


(a)	Purchases of property, plant and equipment are also referred to as capital expenditures. Capital expenditures that primarily maintain existing facilities are classified as maintenance capital expenditures. The following table provides the components of total purchases of property, plant and equipment:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Maintenance capital expenditures	$	(14	)	$	(16	)	$	(82	)	$	(71	)	$	(37	)	$	(32	)	$	(64	)	$	(68	)
Capital expenditures associated with construction of the Dublin EfW facility													(36		)	(48		)	(56		)	(73		)
Capital expenditures associated with organic growth initiatives	(16		)	(9		)	(38		)	(27		)	(9		)	(8		)	(20		)	(22		)
Capital expenditures associated with the New York City contract	—			(9		)	(3		)	(28		)	—			(2		)	—			(3		)
Capital expenditures associated with the Essex County EfW emissions control system	(9		)	(5		)	(27		)	(18		)	—			(8		)	(3		)	(18		)
Capital expenditures associated with construction of the Dublin EfW facility	(59		)	(33		)	(132		)	(123		)
Total capital expenditures associated with growth investments	(84		)	(56		)	(200		)	(196		)	(45		)	(66		)	(79		)	(116		)
Capital expenditures associated with property insurance events													(8		)	—			(9		)	—
Total purchases of property, plant and equipment	$	(98	)	$	(72	)	$	(282	)	$	(267	)	$	(90	)	$	(98	)	$	(152	)	$	(184	)

(b) Growth investments include investments in growth opportunities, including organic growth initiatives, technology, business development and other similar expenditures.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Capital expenditures associated with growth investments	$	(84	)	$	(56	)	$	(200	)	$	(196	)	$	(45	)	$	(66	)	$	(79	)	$	(116	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	—			(22		)	(9		)	(70		)	—			—			(16		)	(9		)
Total growth investments	$	(84	)	$	(78	)	$	(209	)	$	(266	)	$	(45	)	$	(66	)	$	(95	)	$	(125	)


(c)	Excludes borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility. Calculated as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016		2015			2017		2016		2017			2016
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt	$	—	$	129		$	—	$	294		$	—	$	—	$	400		$	—
Refinanced long-term debt	—		(33		)	—		(195		)
Less: Financing costs related to issuance of long-term debt	—		—			—		(1		)	—		—		(7		)	—
Net proceeds from issuance of corporate debt	$	—	$	96		$	—	$	98		$	—	$	—	$	393		$	—


(d)	Calculated as follows:

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Proceeds from borrowings on project debt $ —
$ —
$ —
$ 59
Refinanced project debt —
—
—
(42 )
Less: Financing costs related to the issuance of project debt —
—
—
(2 )
Net proceeds from issuance of project debt $ —
$ —
$ —
$ 15


~~(e)~~	~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we financed $15 million of equipment purchases related to the New York City contract.~~


~~(f)~~	~~Calculated as follows:~~


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Total scheduled principal payments on project debt	$	(8	)	$	(6	)	$	(17	)	$	(21	)	$	(3	)	$	(1	)	$	(12	)	$	(9	)
Decrease in related restricted funds held in trust	(3		)	(3		)	2			2			3			1			5			5
Net cash used for principal payments on project debt	$	(11	)	$	(9	)	$	(15	)	$	(19	)
Net cash used for scheduled principal payments on project debt													$	—		$	—		$	(7	)	$	(4	)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements for information related to new accounting pronouncements.

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP”),~~GAAP, we are required to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and related notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Many of our critical accounting policies are subject to significant judgments and uncertainties which could potentially result in materially different results under different conditions and assumptions. Future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Management believes there have been no material changes during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to the items discussed in Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the normal course of business, our subsidiaries are party to financial instruments that are subject to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and derivative instruments. Our use of derivative instruments is very limited and we do not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes.

There have been no material changes during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to the items discussed in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Covanta’s disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, based on their reviews, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide such reasonable assurance, because the previously reported material ~~weaknesses~~weakness in the tax area, discussed below, ~~have~~has not yet been remediated. We have advised our audit committee of ~~these deficiencies~~this deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting, and the fact that ~~these deficiencies constitute~~this deficiency constitutes a "material ~~weaknesses.~~weakness."

A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls.

Because such material ~~weaknesses were~~weakness was determined to exist, we performed additional procedures to ensure our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q presented fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, management may determine that it is necessary to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or may determine that it is necessary to modify the remediation plans described below. The operation of each of the control changes will need to be observed for a period of time

before management is able to conclude that the material weaknesses have been remediated. If not remediated, these material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements. Management continues to monitor implementation of its remediation plans and timetables and believes the efforts described below will effectively remediate both material weaknesses.

Income Taxes

During the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that we ~~did~~have not ~~maintain effective internal control over~~fully remediated the ~~determination and reporting of the provision for state income taxes, and more specifically, over~~previously-reported material weakness related to the precision of the review to ensure the accuracy of certain cumulative deferred tax balances, including the state income tax rate applied to certain cumulative deferred tax ~~balances.~~balances, and the review of the tax impact of certain business transactions.

Since first reporting this material weakness during the quarter ended June 30, 2015, we have continued to observe the operation of each of the control changes effected as part of our remediation efforts ~~for~~implemented during 2016 as described in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures in our 2016 Form 10-K, as well as the ~~purpose~~following changes implemented effective January 1, 2017 which were put in place to enhance the previously described remediation efforts:

Enhanced analysis of ~~evaluating their effectiveness~~tax-sensitive aspects of a business transaction;

Formalized documentation of the above referenced tax analysis; and

Enhanced review of the above referenced tax analysis prior to finalizing.

As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over ~~a period~~financial reporting, management may determine that it is necessary to take additional measures to address this control deficiency or may determine that it is necessary to modify the remediation plan described above. Management continues to monitor implementation of ~~time sufficient for management to conclude whether~~its remediation plans and timetables and believes the ~~reported~~efforts described above will effectively remediate this material ~~weakness has been remediated.~~ weakness.

Although the control changes have been implemented, we continue to observe and refine them as appropriate, and we have concluded that the period of time over which the operating effectiveness of newly implemented and modified controls ~~was~~is not yet sufficient for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to conclude that this material weakness has been effectively remediated.

~~Municipally-Owned Facility Construction Accounting~~

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that we have not yet remediated the previously-reported material weakness relating to the estimation and timeliness of the reporting of certain costs on municipally-owned construction projects. As originally reported during the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we did not maintain effective internal control over the estimation and timeliness of the reporting of certain costs associated with a maintenance outage conducted to perform certain remediation work on the Durham-York project and initial start-up operations of the project. At the time the material weakness was determined to exist in 2015, the Durham-York project was our only municipally-owned project in original construction or start-up, and is now completed and is in commercial operations. When long-term construction revenue contracts for facilities that are municipally owned move to a projected net loss position, as the Durham-York contract did in the quarter ended June 30, 2015, all changes to the projected net loss are required to be recorded in the period those changes are identified.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we estimated incremental costs for the Durham-York project expected to be incurred to conduct outages to modify certain equipment and to conduct initial start-up operations. During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we determined that our prior estimate was not sufficiently accurate, and required refinement to our projected net loss. We determined that our inability to estimate such outage and start-up costs with sufficient accuracy during the period they were identified constituted a “material weakness” in our internal controls over financial reporting.

Since this material weakness was originally reported, we implemented several new controls and enhancements to existing controls, and commenced observation of the operation of each of the control changes, as previously disclosed, for the purpose of evaluating their effectiveness over a period of time sufficient for management to conclude whether the material weakness has been remediated. We have also observed the operation and accuracy of our cost estimating procedures on our Dublin project (which is not a municipally-owned project), the extent to which those procedures were affected by the material weakness in cost estimating on municipally owned projects, and implemented the same improvements to the Dublin procedures in order to mitigate the potential for inaccuracies in our financial statements. Although the control changes have been implemented, we have concluded that the period of time over which the operating effectiveness of newly implemented and modified controls was not yet sufficient for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to conclude that this material weakness has been effectively remediated.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must consider the benefits of controls relative to their costs. Inherent limitations within a control system include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by unauthorized override of the control. While the design of any system of controls is to provide reasonable assurance of the effectiveness of disclosure controls, such design is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and such assumptions, while reasonable, may not take into account all potential future conditions. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be prevented or detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as noted in the preceding paragraphs, there has not been any change in our system of internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For information regarding legal proceedings, see Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a) None.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 6. EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number		Description
~~31.1~~ 10.1		Form of Covanta Holding Corporation Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
31.1		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer.
31.2		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer.
32		Certification of periodic financial report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 101.INS:		XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH:		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
Exhibit 101.CAL:		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
Exhibit 101.DEF:		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
Exhibit 101.LAB:		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase
Exhibit 101.PRE:		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION (Registrant)

	By:	/S/ BRADFORD J. HELGESON
		Bradford J. Helgeson
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer ~~and Principal Accounting Officer~~

	By:	/S/ MANPREET S. GREWAL
		Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Date: ~~October 26, 2016~~July 28, 2017

4138



Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Component	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations

Foreign currency translation	$	5	Gain on asset sales
	5		Total before tax
	—		Tax benefit
Total reclassifications	$	5	Net of tax



	Total Available Under Credit Facility		Expiring ⁽¹⁾	Direct Borrowings as of September 30, 2016		Outstanding Letters of Credit as of September 30, 2016		Availability as of September 30, 2016
Revolving Credit Facility	$	1,000	2020	$	384	$	148	$	468



	Remainder of 2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		Thereafter
Annual Remaining Amortization	$	2	$	5	$	5	$	5	$	6	$	78



Derivative Instruments Not Designated As Hedging Instruments		Fair Value as of
	Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Asset Derivatives:
Foreign currency	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	—	$	6



Settled FX Derivatives
Instrument	Notional Amount	Maturity	Settlement Received
FX Collar	$50	March 2016	$2
FX Collar	$50	April 2016	$1
FX Forward	$50	June 2016	$—
FX Forward	$50	July 2016	$1
FX Forward	$50	September 2016	$1
FX Forward	$49	September 2016	$—
FX Forward	$49	September 2016	$—



Tons Sold by Type (in thousands)⁽¹⁾	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Variance Increase (Decrease)
	2016	2015	2016	2015	Three Month		Nine Month
Ferrous Metal	72	90	235	251	(18	)	(16	)
Non-Ferrous Metal	10	9	27	24	1		3



	Three Months Ended
Recycled Metals Revenue (in millions):	2016		2015		2014
March 31,	$	13	$	16	$	21
June 30,	17		17		25
September 30,	14		16		26
December 31,	—		12		21
Total for the year ended December 31,	N/A		$	61	$	93