0000720005 ~~rjf:LoansHeldForSaleMember 2017-10-01 2018-06-30~~us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember 2020-03-31

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)



☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from		to

Commission File Number: 1-9109

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Florida		59-1517485
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(727) 567-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value	RJF	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

~~138,843,196~~137,030,516 shares of common stock as of ~~August 7, 2019~~May 5, 2020

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



INDEX
		PAGE
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018~~2019 (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and June 30, 2018~~ (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and June 30, 2018~~ (Unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and June 30, 2018~~ (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Note 1 - Organization and basis of presentation	8
	Note 2 - Update of significant accounting policies	98
	Note 3 - ~~Acquisitions~~Fair value	1110
	Note 4 - ~~Fair value~~Available-for-sale securities	1216
	Note 5 - ~~Available-for-sale securities~~Derivative assets and derivative liabilities	1918
	Note 6 - ~~Derivative assets~~Collateralized agreements and ~~derivative liabilities~~financings	20
	Note 7 - ~~Collateralized agreements and financings~~Bank loans, net	2321
	Note 8 - ~~Bank loans, net~~Variable interest entities	2528
	Note 9 - ~~Variable interest entities~~Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, net	3229
	Note 10 - ~~Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, net~~Leases	3329
	Note 11 - Bank deposits	3431
	Note 12 - Other borrowings	3532
	Note 13 - ~~Income taxes~~Senior notes payable	3533
	Note 14 - ~~Commitments, contingencies and guarantees~~Income taxes	3633
	Note 15 - ~~Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)~~Commitments, contingencies and guarantees	3934
	Note 16 - ~~Revenues~~Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)	4137
	Note 17 - ~~Interest income and interest expense~~Revenues	4638
	Note 18 - ~~Share-based compensation~~Interest income and interest expense	4742
	Note 19 - ~~Regulatory capital requirements~~Share-based compensation	4742
	Note 20 - ~~Earnings per share~~Regulatory capital requirements	4943
	Note 21 - Earnings per share	45
	Note 22 - Segment information	4945
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	5248
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	8884
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	8884
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	8985
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8985
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	9088
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	9088
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	9088
Item 5.	Other Information	9088
Item 6.	Exhibits	9189
	Signatures	9189

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Unaudited)


$ in millions, except per share amounts	June 30, 2019			September 30, 2018			March 31, 2020			September 30, 2019
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,596		$	3,500		$	10,648		$	3,957
Cash segregated pursuant to regulations	2,356			2,441
Cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations							4,045			2,014
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	411			373			130			343
Securities borrowed	306			255			250			248
Financial instruments, at fair value:
Trading instruments (includes $557 and $465 pledged as collateral)	803			702
Available-for-sale securities (includes $16 and $20 pledged as collateral)	2,960			2,696
Trading instruments ($236 and $535 pledged as collateral)							445			708
Available-for-sale securities ($28 and $24 pledged as collateral)							4,265			3,093
Derivative assets	304			180			447			338
Private equity investments	146			147
Other investments (includes $24 and $25 pledged as collateral)	253			202
Other investments ($40 and $32 pledged as collateral)							316			365
Brokerage client receivables, net	2,613			3,343			2,491			2,671
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	274			257			445			281
Other receivables	631			592			846			549
Bank loans, net	20,691			19,518			21,788			20,891
Loans to financial advisors, net	936			925			982			983
Investments in real estate partnerships held by consolidated variable interest entities	69			107
Property and equipment, net	518			486			543			527
Deferred income taxes, net	210			203			224			231
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, net	635			639			603			611
Other assets	965			847			1,341			1,020
Total assets	$	38,677		$	37,413		$	49,809		$	38,830

Liabilities and equity:
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Bank deposits	$	22,166		$	19,942		$	30,023		$	22,281
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	165			186			215			150
Securities loaned	429			423			28			323
Financial instruments sold but not yet purchased, at fair value:
Trading instruments	287			235			24			296
Derivative liabilities	275			247			427			313
Brokerage client payables	4,343			5,625			7,076			4,361
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	174			206			284			229
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits	1,093			1,189			929			1,272
Other payables	686			459			1,034			518
Other borrowings	945			899			891			894
Senior notes payable	1,550			1,550			2,044			1,550
Total liabilities	32,113			30,961			42,975			32,187
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)
Equity
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock; $.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; -0- shares issued and outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock; $.01 par value; 350,000,000 shares authorized; 158,316,880 and 156,363,615 shares issued as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively, and 139,666,546 and 145,642,437 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively	2			2
Common stock; $.01 par value; 350,000,000 shares authorized; 158,731,812 and 158,435,030 shares issued as of March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively, and 136,787,387 and 137,841,952 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively							2			2
Additional paid-in capital	1,915			1,808			1,953			1,938
Retained earnings	5,659			5,032			6,205			5,874
Treasury stock, at cost; 18,650,334 and 10,693,026 common shares as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively	(1,060		)	(447		)
Treasury stock, at cost; 21,944,425 and 20,593,078 common shares as of March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively							(1,351		)	(1,210		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(14		)	(27		)	(11		)	(23		)
Total equity attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.	6,502			6,368			6,798			6,581
Noncontrolling interests	62			84			36			62
Total equity	6,564			6,452
Total liabilities and equity	$	38,677		$	37,413
Total shareholders’ equity							6,834			6,643
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity							$	49,809		$	38,830

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
in millions, except per share amounts	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	879		$	790		$	2,527		$	2,287		$	1,006		$	783		$	1,961		$	1,648
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions	358			395			1,095			1,236			410			349			773			737
Principal transactions	93			73			262			255			105			93			202			169
Total brokerage revenues	451			468			1,357			1,491			515			442			975			906
Account and service fees	183			187			559			535			172			191			350			376
Investment banking	139			145			439			349			148			163			289			300
Interest income	321			271			961			752			285			324			582			640
Other	27			30			95			100			(15		)	31			14			68
Total revenues	2,000			1,891			5,938			5,514			2,111			1,934			4,171			3,938
Interest expense	(73		)	(54		)	(221		)	(139		)	(43		)	(75		)	(94		)	(148		)
Net revenues	1,927			1,837			5,717			5,375			2,068			1,859			4,077			3,790
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation, commissions and benefits	1,277			1,208			3,767			3,557			1,422			1,225			2,773			2,490
Non-compensation expenses:
Communications and information processing	92			89			278			262			99			94			193			186
Occupancy and equipment costs	55			49			159			149
Occupancy and equipment													56			53			113			104
Business development	57			57			141			134			41			41			85			84
Investment sub-advisory fees	24			23			70			68			26			22			52			46
Professional fees	22			20			61			48			23			17			44			39
Bank loan loss provision/(benefit)	(5		)	5			16			14
Bank loan loss provision													109			5			107			21
Acquisition and disposition-related expenses	—			—			15			4			—			—			—			15
Other	65			68			205			178			53			55			112			126
Total non-compensation expenses													407			287			706			621
Total non-interest expenses	1,587			1,519			4,712			4,414			1,829			1,512			3,479			3,111
Income including noncontrolling interests and before provision for income taxes	340			318			1,005			961
Pre-tax income													239			347			598			679
Provision for income taxes	83			86			252			367			70			86			161			169
Net income including noncontrolling interests	257			232			753			594
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	(2		)	—			(16		)	—
Net income attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.	$	259		$	232		$	769		$	594
Net income													$	169		$	261		437			510

Earnings per common share – basic	$	1.84		$	1.59		$	5.42		$	4.08		$	1.22		$	1.85		$	3.15		$	3.58
Earnings per common share – diluted	$	1.80		$	1.55		$	5.30		$	3.99		$	1.20		$	1.81		$	3.09		$	3.51
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic	140.4			145.6			141.8			145.2			138.4			140.8			138.4			142.5
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding – diluted	143.6			149.4			144.8			148.8			141.1			143.9			141.3			145.4

Net income attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.	$	259		$	232		$	769		$	594
Net income													$	169		$	261		$	437		$	510
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Available-for-sale securities	24			(4		)	65			(31		)	63			19			62			41
Currency translations, net of the impact of net investment hedges	6			(6		)	1			(8		)	(26		)	8			(17		)	(5		)
Cash flow hedges	(19		)	6			(49		)	27			(43		)	(13		)	(33		)	(30		)
Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	11			(4		)	17			(12		)	(6		)	14			12			6
Total comprehensive income	$	270		$	228		$	786		$	582		$	163		$	275		$	449		$	516

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions, except per share amounts	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Common stock, par value $.01 per share:
Balance beginning of period	$	2		$	2		$	2		$	2		$	2		$	2		$	2		$	2
Share issuances	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Balance end of period	2			2			2			2			2			2			2			2

Additional paid-in capital:
Balance beginning of period	1,917			1,748			1,808			1,645			1,922			1,871			1,938			1,808
Employee stock purchases	7			8			27			24			11			12			17			20
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, net of forfeitures	2			4			27			34			(8		)	9			(71		)	25
Restricted stock, stock option and restricted stock unit expense	21			21			85			77			28			25			69			64
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest and other	(32		)	—			(32		)	1
Balance end of period	1,915			1,781			1,915			1,781			1,953			1,917			1,953			1,917

Retained earnings:
Balance beginning of period	5,448			4,626			5,032			4,340			6,086			5,236			5,874			5,032
Net income attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.	259			232			769			594			169			261			437			510
Cash dividends declared (see Note 20)	(47		)	(44		)	(146		)	(119		)
Cash dividends declared (see Note 21)													(50		)	(49		)	(106		)	(99		)
Other	(1		)	—			4			(1		)	—			—			—			5
Balance end of period	5,659			4,814			5,659			4,814			6,205			5,448			6,205			5,448

Treasury stock:
Balance beginning of period	(976		)	(412		)	(447		)	(390		)	(1,163		)	(927		)	(1,210		)	(447		)
Purchases/surrenders	(86		)	(1		)	(598		)	(9		)	(203		)	(48		)	(222		)	(512		)
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, net of forfeitures	2			—			(15		)	(14		)	15			(1		)	81			(17		)
Balance end of period	(1,060		)	(413		)	(1,060		)	(413		)	(1,351		)	(976		)	(1,351		)	(976		)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Balance beginning of period	(25		)	(23		)	(27		)	(15		)	(5		)	(39		)	(23		)	(27		)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	11			(4		)	17			(12		)	(6		)	14			12			6
Other	—			—			(4		)	—			—			—			—			(4		)
Balance end of period	(14		)	(27		)	(14		)	(27		)	(11		)	(25		)	(11		)	(25		)
Total equity attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.	$	6,502		$	6,157		$	6,502		$	6,157		$	6,798		$	6,366		$	6,798		$	6,366

Noncontrolling interests:
Balance beginning of period	$	69		$	101		$	84		$	112		$	61		$	82		$	62		$	84
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	(2		)	—			(16		)	—			(23		)	(12		)	(24		)	(14		)
Capital contributions	—			—			2			—			—			—			—			2
Distributions and other	(5		)	(8		)	(8		)	(19		)	(2		)	(1		)	(2		)	(3		)
Balance end of period	62			93			62			93			36			69			36			69
Total equity	$	6,564		$	6,250		$	6,564		$	6,250
Total shareholders’ equity													$	6,834		$	6,435		$	6,834		$	6,435

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)	RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)							RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

		Nine months ended June 30,							Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions		2019			2018				2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc.		$	769		$	594
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(16		)	—
Net income including noncontrolling interests		753			594
Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income									$	437		$	510
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		81			72				58			53
Deferred income taxes		(22		)	99				(14		)	(1		)
Premium and discount amortization on available-for-sale securities and loss on other investments		14			3				43			7
Provisions for loan losses, legal and regulatory proceedings and bad debts		45			34				124			38
Share-based compensation expense		88			75				74			65
Unrealized gain on company-owned life insurance policies, net of expenses		(9		)	(20		)
Unrealized (gain)/loss on company-owned life insurance policies, net of expenses									76			8
Other		47			22				(4		)	27
Net change in:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, net of securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(61		)	(48		)		273			(53		)
Securities borrowed, net of securities loaned		(44		)	(24		)
Securities loaned, net of securities borrowed									(297		)	319
Loans provided to financial advisors, net of repayments		(28		)	(78		)		(11		)	1
Brokerage client receivables and other accounts receivable, net		679			(144		)		(203		)	587
Trading instruments, net		(52		)	(88		)		—			(36		)
Derivative instruments, net		(137		)	77				(25		)	(93		)
Other assets		(83		)	(49		)		(176		)	(118		)
Brokerage client payables and other accounts payable		(1,300		)	(184		)		2,937			(1,088		)
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits		(99		)	(52		)		(340		)	(229		)
Proceeds from sales of securitizations and loans held for sale, net of purchases and originations of loans held for sale		27			(65		)		(9		)	23
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities		(101		)	224
Net cash provided by operating activities									2,943			20

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property and equipment		(102		)	(96		)		(71		)	(59		)
Increase in bank loans, net		(1,226		)	(1,875		)		(1,066		)	(779		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for investment		210			140				25			184
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(689		)	(899		)		(1,403		)	(509		)
Available-for-sale securities maturations, repayments and redemptions		456			360				435			295
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired		(5		)	(159		)
Other investing activities, net		(30		)	31				(10		)	(42		)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,386		)	(2,498		)		(2,090		)	(910		)

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)	RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)							RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

		Nine months ended June 30,							Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions		2019			2018				2020			2019
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on the RJF Credit Facility		300			300				—			300
Repayments of borrowings on the RJF Credit Facility		(300		)	(300		)		—			(300		)
Proceeds from/(repayments of) short-term borrowings, net		50			(610		)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		850			850				850			—
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds		(854		)	(854		)		(853		)	(3		)
Proceeds from senior notes issuances, net of debt issuance costs paid									495			—
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases		53			54				43			43
Increase in bank deposits		2,224			1,747				7,742			1,676
Purchases of treasury stock		(616		)	(24		)		(222		)	(521		)
Dividends on common stock		(143		)	(107		)		(103		)	(95		)
Acquisitions of and distributions to noncontrolling interests, net		(54		)	(14		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net									(1		)	(1		)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,510			1,042				7,951			1,099

Currency adjustment:
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(12		)	(47		)		(82		)	(31		)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and cash segregated pursuant to regulations		11			(1,279		)
Cash, cash equivalents, and cash segregated pursuant to regulations at beginning of year		5,941			7,146
Cash, cash equivalents, and cash segregated pursuant to regulations at end of period		$	5,952		$	5,867
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations									8,722			178
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations at beginning of year									5,971			5,941
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations at end of period									$	14,693		$	6,119

Cash and cash equivalents		$	3,596		$	3,180			$	10,648		$	3,831
Cash segregated pursuant to regulations		2,356			2,687
Total cash, cash equivalents, and cash segregated pursuant to regulations at end of period		$	5,952		$	5,867
Cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations									4,045			2,288
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations at end of period									$	14,693		$	6,119

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$	208		$	127			$	92		$	147
Cash paid for income taxes, net		$	295		$	192			$	176		$	188

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Organization

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (“RJF,” the “firm” or the “Company”) is a financial holding company which, together with its subsidiaries, is engaged in various financial services activities, including providing investment management services for retail and institutional clients, the underwriting, distribution, trading and brokerage of equity and debt securities, and the sale of mutual funds and other investment products. The firm also provides corporate and retail banking services, and trust services. For further information about our business segments, see Note 2122 of this Form 10-Q. As used herein, the terms “our,” “we,” or “us” refer to RJF and/or one or more of its subsidiaries.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RJF and its consolidated subsidiaries that are generally controlled through a majority voting interest. We consolidate all of our 100% owned subsidiaries. In addition, we consolidate any variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary. Additional information on these VIEs is provided in Note 2 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K ~~(the “2018~~(“2019 Form 10-K”) for the year ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, as filed with the United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in Note 98 of this Form 10-Q. When we do not have a controlling interest in an entity, but we exert significant influence over the entity, we apply the equity method of accounting. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounting estimates and assumptions

Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) but is not required for interim reporting purposes has been condensed or omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.

The nature of our business is such that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements and ~~notes~~Notes thereto included in our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. To prepare condensed consolidated financial statements in ~~conformity~~accordance with GAAP, we must make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Effective with the firm’s first fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, we have reclassified certain revenues among income statement line items and renamed certain line items. These reclassifications do not affect the Company’s reported total revenues or the total revenues in any of our segments for any of the previously reported periods. Prior period results have been conformed to the current presentation.

~~In addition to the reclassifications discussed in the preceding paragraph, certain other~~Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 2 – UPDATE OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there were no significant changes to our significant accounting policies other than the accounting policies adopted or modified as part of our implementation of new or amended accounting guidance, as noted in the following sections.

~~Loans to financial advisors, net~~

We offer loans to financial advisors and certain other key revenue producers, primarily for recruiting, transitional cost assistance, and retention purposes. We present the outstanding balance of loans to financial advisors on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Of the gross balance outstanding, the portion associated with financial advisors who are no longer affiliated with us was $22 million and $20 million at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $10 million and $8 million at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively.

Recent accounting developments

Accounting guidance recently adopted

~~Goodwill -~~ In January 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, eliminating “Step 2” from the goodwill impairment test (ASU 2017-04). Under this amended guidance, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and subsequently recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We early-adopted this guidance on January 1, 2019, our goodwill impairment test date. The adoption did not have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Revenue recognition -~~ In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to revenue recognition (ASU 2014-09). The new guidance is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. It also provides guidance on accounting for certain contract costs and requires additional disclosures. We adopted this guidance as of October 1, 2018, under a modified retrospective approach for all open contracts as of the date of initial adoption. As such, there was no impact on our prior period results.

The primary impact of this guidance was the change in the presentation of certain costs from a net presentation within revenues to a gross presentation, particularly costs related to merger & acquisitions advisory and underwriting transactions and certain administrative costs related to our multi-bank sweep program. These presentation changes had no impact on our net earnings. There were no material changes in timing of revenues recognized associated with the adoption. As a result, adoption of this guidance had no material impact on our net results of operations or financial position. See Note 16 for further information.

~~Financial instruments -~~ In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the accounting for financial instruments (ASU 2016-01). Among its provisions, this new guidance generally requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, subject to certain exceptions, and amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. We adopted this guidance as of October 1, 2018, under a modified retrospective approach. As a result, on a prospective basis beginning as of the date of adoption, we record changes in the fair value of our investments in equity securities that were previously classified as available-for-sale in net income. Previously, such unrealized gains/(losses) were reflected in other comprehensive income/(loss) (“OCI”). The impact of adopting the new guidance resulted in a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (“AOCI”) to retained earnings of an accumulated gain of approximately $4 million at October 1, 2018. See Note 5 for further information.

~~Statement of Cash Flows (classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments) -~~ In August 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance related to the Statement of Cash Flows (ASU 2016-15). The amended guidance provides guidance on disclosure and classification of certain items within the statements of cash flows. We adopted this guidance on October 1, 2018, under a retrospective approach. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of cash flows and did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Statement of Cash Flows (restricted cash) -~~ In November 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows (ASU 2016-18). The guidance requires an entity to include restricted cash and cash equivalents in its total of cash and cash equivalents on its statement of cash flows and to present a reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total of such amounts on the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance on

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

October 1, 2018, under a retrospective approach. As a result of adoption, we recorded a decrease of $765 million in net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2018 related to reclassifying changes in cash segregated pursuant to regulations from operating activities to the cash and cash equivalents balance in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The total of cash segregated pursuant to regulations and cash and cash equivalents is included in a separate table in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Definition of a business -~~ In January 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance related to the definition of a business (ASU 2017-01). This amended guidance clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. We adopted this guidance on October 1, 2018, on a prospective basis. The impact of the adoption of this amended guidance is dependent upon acquisition and disposal activities subsequent to the date of adoption. The adoption did not have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Share-based payment awards (modifications) -~~ In May 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance that clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting (ASU 2017-09). The amended guidance states an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless certain criteria are met which include that the modified award has the same fair value, vesting conditions and classification as the original award. We adopted the guidance on October 1, 2018, on a prospective basis. We generally do not modify our share-based payments awards. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Share-based payment awards (nonemployee)~~ - In June 2018, the FASB issued amended guidance that aligns the measurement and classification guidance for share-based payments to nonemployees with the guidance for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions (ASU 2018-07). The amended guidance states an entity should measure the fair value of the award by estimating the fair value of the equity instruments to be issued and, for equity-classified awards, the fair value should be measured on the grant date. The amended guidance also clarifies that nonemployee awards that contain a performance condition are to be measured based on the outcome that is probable and that entities may elect, on an award-by-award basis, to use the expected term or contractual term to measure the award. We early-adopted this standard on October 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~Accounting guidance not yet adopted as of June 30, 2019~~

Lease accounting - In February 2016, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance related to the accounting for leases (ASU 2016-02). The new guidance and subsequent amendments requires the recognition of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the rights and obligations created by lease agreements with terms greater than twelve months, regardless

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

of whether they are classified as finance or operating leases. ~~Consistent with current~~We adopted this guidance ~~the recognition, measurement and presentation~~as of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease will primarily depend upon its classification as a finance or operating lease. The new guidance requires new disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and cash flows arising from leases. This new guidance, including subsequent amendments, is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, ~~2019. Although permitted, we do not plan to early adopt. Upon adoption, we will use~~2019 using the alternative modified retrospective approach, with ~~a cumulative effect adjustment~~no adjustments to ~~opening retained earnings~~prior periods presented. In addition, we elected the practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance which, among other things, allowed us to carry forward historical lease classification determinations. On the adoption date, we recognized right-of-use assets (“ROU assets”) and lease liabilities of $333 million and $357 million, respectively, in ~~the period~~“Other assets” and “Other payables” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of adoption. Our implementation efforts include reviewing existing leases and service contracts, which may include embedded leases. We are near completion with the process of identifying and validating changes to our business policies and processes, systems and controls, and reports to support adoption of the new guidance. This new guidance will increase both ourFinancial Condition. The ROU assets and lease liabilities ~~on our statement of financial condition. We are evaluating the magnitude of such impact. We do not expect a material impact~~were primarily related to operating leases. The adoption had no effect on our results of operations or cash flows. The impact of the adoption on our regulatory capital measures was insignificant. See Note 10 for further information.

Derivatives and hedging (interest rate) - In October 2018, the FASB issued guidance amending Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) to add the overnight index swap rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) to the list of U.S. benchmark interest rates that are eligible during the early stages of the market transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to SOFR (ASU 2018-16). The amendments to this guidance will provide adequate lead time for entities to prepare for changes to interest rate hedging strategies. We adopted the guidance October 1, 2019 and will apply the guidance prospectively for qualifying new or re-designated hedging relationships. The adoption did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

Reference rate reform - In March 2020, the FASB issued guidance to ease the financial reporting burdens of the expected market transition from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates, such as SOFR (ASU 2020-04). The guidance simplifies the accounting for modifying contracts (including those in hedging relationships) that refer to LIBOR and other interbank offered rates. In addition, the guidance allows for changes to the critical terms of a hedging relationship affected by reference rate reform without having to dedesignate the relationship. The guidance was effective upon issuance and generally can be applied through December 31, 2022. We have elected certain expedients for cash flow hedges to assert that the hedged forecasted transaction remains probable, regardless of any expected modification in terms related to reference rate reform. The expedient elected did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

Accounting guidance not yet adopted as of March 31, 2020

Credit losses - In June 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments (ASU 2016-13). The amended guidance involves several aspects of the accounting for credit losses related to certain financial instruments including assets measured at amortized cost, available-for-sale debt securities and certain off-balance sheet commitments. The new guidance, and subsequent updates, broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of assets measured either collectively or individually to include historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, replacing the existing incurred credit loss model and other models with the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) model. The new guidance expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating credit losses and requires new disclosures of the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. This new guidance is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2020 and will be adopted under a modified retrospective approach. Although permitted, we do not plan to early adopt. ~~We have~~Our cross-functional team has continued ~~with~~ our implementation ~~and evaluation efforts, which include a cross-functional team to assess~~efforts. We are in the ~~required changes to~~process of validating our credit loss ~~estimation methodologies and systems,~~models, as well as ~~the determination of additional data~~establishing formal policies and ~~resources required~~procedures, including control documentation related to ~~comply with~~this new guidance. In addition we are developing the new disclosures required by this new guidance. We ~~are evaluating~~continue to evaluate the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

position and results of ~~operations, which~~operations. The impact will ultimately depend on, among other things, ~~the~~changes to our methodologies, management judgments, current and expected macroeconomic conditions, and the nature and characteristics of financial assets held by us on the date of adoption.

~~Callable debt securities -~~ In March 2017, the FASB issued new guidance that requires certain premiums on callable debt securities to be amortized to the earliest call date instead of the contractual life of the security (ASU 2017-08). Discounts on callable debt securities will continue to be amortized to the contractual maturity date. This guidance is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2019 and will be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. Although permitted, we do not plan to early adopt. We are evaluating the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.

Internal use software (cloud computing) - In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements (ASU 2018-15). This guidance requires implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements to be deferred over the ~~non-cancellable~~non-cancelable term of the cloud computing arrangements plus any optional renewal periods (1) that are reasonably certain to be exercised by the customer or (2) for which exercise of the renewal option is controlled by the cloud service provider. This amended guidance is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2020 with early adoption ~~permitted.~~permitted, although we do not plan to early adopt. The guidance may be adopted either using the prospective or retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on our financial position and results of operations.

~~Derivatives and hedging (interest rate) -~~ In October 2018, the FASB issued guidance amending Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) to add the overnight index swap (OIS rate) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) to the list of US benchmark interest rates that are eligible to be hedged (ASU 2018-16). This guidance is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.

Consolidation (decision making fees) - In October 2018, the FASB issued guidance on how all entities evaluate decision-making fees under the ~~variable interest entity~~VIE guidance (ASU 2018-17). Under the new guidance, to determine whether decision-making fees represent a variable interest, an entity considers indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportionate basis, rather than in their entirety. This guidance is first effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2020. ~~Early adoption is permitted.~~Although permitted, we do not plan to early adopt. We are evaluating the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.

~~NOTE 3 - ACQUISITIONS~~

Effective April 2019, we increased our ownership of ClariVest Asset Management LLC (“ClariVest”) from 45% to 100% making ClariVest a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eagle Asset Management. ClariVest has been included in our consolidated financial statements since our initial investment of the 45% interest as we concluded we were required to consolidate as defined by accounting guidance. The increase in ownership was accounted for as a shareholder’s equity transaction.

In April 2019, we completed our acquisition of Silver Lane Advisors LLC (“Silver Lane”), a boutique investment bank focused on merger & acquisition advisory. Silver Lane has been integrated into our Capital Markets segment. We accounted for this acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting with the assets and liabilities of Silver Lane recorded as of the acquisition date at their respective fair values in our consolidated financial statements. For purposes of certain acquisition-related financial reporting requirements, the Silver Lane acquisition was not considered a material acquisition. Silver Lane’s results of operations have been included in our results prospectively from April 1, 2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 43 – FAIR VALUE

Our “Financial instruments owned” and “Financial instruments sold but not yet purchased” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are recorded at fair value under GAAP. For further information about such instruments and our significant accounting policies related to fair value, see Note 2 and Note 4 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. The following tables present assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Netting adjustments represent the impact of counterparty and collateral netting on our derivative balances included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. See Note 65 for additional information.


$ in millions	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting adjustments			Balance as of June 30, 2019		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting adjustments			Balance as of March 31, 2020
Assets at fair value on a recurring basis:
Trading instruments
Municipal and provincial obligations	$	—	$	242	$	—	$	—		$	242	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	—		$	14
Corporate obligations	12		111		—		—			123		12		9		—		—			21
Government and agency obligations	32		84		—		—			116		30		28		—		—			58
Agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”)	—		198		—		—			198		—		281		—		—			281
Non-agency CMOs and asset-backed securities (“ABS”)	—		71		—		—			71		—		17		—		—			17
Total debt securities	44		706		—		—			750		42		349		—		—			391
Equity securities	12		1		—		—			13		9		—		—		—			9
Brokered certificates of deposit	—		39		—		—			39		—		24		—		—			24
Other	—		—		1		—			1		—		—		21		—			21
Total trading instruments	56		746		1		—			803		51		373		21		—			445
Available-for-sale securities - agency MBS and CMOs	—		2,960		—		—			2,960
Available-for-sale securities ⁽¹⁾												16		4,249		—		—			4,265
Derivative assets
Interest rate - Matched book	—		246		—		—			246
Interest rate - Other	10		127		—		(80		)	57
Foreign exchange	—		1		—		—			1
Interest rate - matched book												—		351		—		—			351
Interest rate - other												93		266		—		(263		)	96
Total derivative assets	10		374		—		(80		)	304		93		617		—		(263		)	447
Private equity investments - not measured at net asset value (“NAV”)	—		—		59		—			59
Other investments	187		1		65		—			253
Other investments - private equity - not measured at net asset value (“NAV”)												—		—		30		—			30
All other investments												192		1		22		—			215
Subtotal	253		4,081		125		(80		)	4,379		352		5,240		73		(263		)	5,402
Private equity investments - measured at NAV										87
Other investments - private equity - measured at NAV																					71
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	253	$	4,081	$	125	$	(80	)	$	4,466	$	352	$	5,240	$	73	$	(263	)	$	5,473

Liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis:
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased
Municipal and provincial obligations	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	1	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	1
Corporate obligations	1		16		—		—			17		1		7		—		—			8
Government and agency obligations	260		—		—		—			260		6		—		—		—			6
Non-agency CMOs and ABS												—		6		—		—			6
Total debt securities	262		16		—		—			278		8		13		—		—			21
Equity securities	6		—		—		—			6		3		—		—		—			3
Other	—		—		3		—			3		—		—		—		—			—
Total trading instruments sold but not yet purchased	268		16		3		—			287		11		13		—		—			24
Derivative liabilities
Interest rate - Matched book	—		246		—		—			246
Interest rate - Other	12		106		—		(100		)	18
Interest rate - matched book												—		351		—		—			351
Interest rate - other												102		185		—		(218		)	69
Foreign exchange	—		4		—		—			4		—		6		—		—			6
Equity - Deutsche Bank restricted stock unit (“DBRSU”) obligation	—		7		—		—			7
Equity												—		1		—		—			1
Total derivative liabilities	12		363		—		(100		)	275		102		543		—		(218		)	427
Total liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis	$	280	$	379	$	3	$	(100	)	$	562	$	113	$	556	$	—	$	(218	)	$	451


(1)	Substantially all of our available-for-sale securities consist of agency MBS and CMOs. See Note 4 for further information.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


$ in millions	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting adjustments			Balance as of September 30, 2018		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting adjustments			Balance as of September 30, 2019
Assets at fair value on a recurring basis:
Trading instruments
Municipal and provincial obligations	$	1	$	247	$	—	$	—		$	248	$	—	$	267	$	—	$	—		$	267
Corporate obligations	10		100		—		—			110		8		95		—		—			103
Government and agency obligations	19		72		—		—			91		12		67		—		—			79
Agency MBS and CMOs	3		124		—		—			127		—		147		—		—			147
Non-agency CMOs and ABS	—		69		—		—			69		—		51		—		—			51
Total debt securities	33		612		—		—			645		20		627		—		—			647
Equity securities	15		—		—		—			15		12		1		—		—			13
Brokered certificates of deposit	—		39		—		—			39		—		45		—		—			45
Other	—		2		1		—			3		—		—		3		—			3
Total trading instruments	48		653		1		—			702		32		673		3		—			708
Available-for-sale securities(1)												10		3,083		—		—			3,093
Agency MBS and CMOs	—		2,628		—		—			2,628
Other securities	1		—		—		—			1
Auction rate securities (“ARS”) preferred	—		—		67		—			67
Total available-for-sale securities	1		2,628		67		—			2,696
Derivative assets
Interest rate - Matched book	—		160		—		—			160
Interest rate - Other	—		74		—		(55		)	19
Foreign exchange	—		1		—		—			1
Interest rate - matched book												—		280		—		—			280
Interest rate - other												3		182		—		(127		)	58
Total derivative assets	—		235		—		(55		)	180		3		462		—		(127		)	338
Private equity investments - not measured at NAV	—		—		56		—			56
Other investments	201		1		—		—			202
Other investments - private equity - not measured at NAV												—		—		63		—			63
All other investments												194		1		24		—			219
Subtotal	250		3,517		124		(55		)	3,836		239		4,219		90		(127		)	4,421
Private equity investments - measured at NAV										91
Other investments - private equity - measured at NAV																					83
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	250	$	3,517	$	124	$	(55	)	$	3,927	$	239	$	4,219	$	90	$	(127	)	$	4,504

Liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis:
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased
Municipal and provincial obligations	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	1
Corporate obligations	2		25		—		—			27		$	2	$	20	$	—	$	—		$	22
Government and agency obligations	194		—		—		—			194		269		—		—		—			269
Non-agency MBS and CMOs	—		1		—		—			1
Total debt securities	196		27		—		—			223		271		20		—		—			291
Equity securities	5		—		—		—			5		4		—		—		—			4
Other	—		—		7		—			7		—		—		1		—			1
Total trading instruments sold but not yet purchased	201		27		7		—			235		275		20		1		—			296
Derivative liabilities
Interest rate - Matched book	—		160		—		—			160
Interest rate - Other	—		114		—		(47		)	67
Interest rate - matched book												—		280		—		—			280
Interest rate - other												4		142		—		(121		)	25
Foreign exchange	—		4		—		—			4		—		2		—		—			2
Equity - DBRSU obligation	—		16		—		—			16
Equity												—		6		—		—			6
Total derivative liabilities	—		294		—		(47		)	247		4		430		—		(121		)	313
Total liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis	$	201	$	321	$	7	$	(47	)	$	482	$	279	$	450	$	1	$	(121	)	$	609


(1)	Substantially all of our available-for-sale securities consist of agency MBS and CMOs. See Note 4 for further information.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Level 3 recurring fair value measurements

The following tables present the changes in fair value for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The realized and unrealized gains and losses in the tables may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. In the following tables, gains/(losses) on trading instruments are reported in “Principal ~~transactions,”~~transactions” and gains/(losses) on ~~private equity and~~ other investments are reported in “Other” revenues, and gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities are reported in either “Other” revenues (when included in earnings) or “Other comprehensive income” in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.revenues.


Three months ended June 30, 2019 Level 3 instruments at fair value
Three months ended March 31, 2020 Level 3 instruments at fair value												Three months ended March 31, 2020 Level 3 instruments at fair value
													Financial assets									Financial liabilities
	Financial assets								Financial liabilities				Trading instruments			Other investments						Trading instruments
$ in millions	Trading instruments - Other			Private equity investments		Other investments			Trading instruments - Other				Other			Private equity investments			All other			Other
Fair value beginning of period	$	2		$	59	$	67		$	(7	)		$	19		$	62		$	24		$	(1	)
Total gains/(losses) included in earnings	(1		)	—		(2		)	—				3			(32		)	(2		)	—
Purchases and contributions	26			—		—			7				22			—			—			1
Sales	(26		)	—		—			(3		)
Sales and distributions													(23		)	—			—			—
Transfers:
Into Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—			—			—
Out of Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—			—			—
Fair value end of period	$	1		$	59	$	65		$	(3	)		$	21		$	30		$	22		$	—
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings for instruments held at the end of the reporting period	$	1		$	—	$	(2	)	$	—			$	5		$	(32	)	$	(2	)	$	—


Nine months ended June 30, 2019 Level 3 instruments at fair value
Six months ended March 31, 2020 Level 3 instruments at fair value												Six months ended March 31, 2020 Level 3 instruments at fair value
													Financial assets									Financial liabilities
	Financial assets								Financial liabilities				Trading instruments			Other investments						Trading instruments
$ in millions	Trading instruments - Other			Private equity investments		Other investments ⁽¹⁾			Trading instruments - Other				Other			Private equity investments			All other			Other
Fair value beginning of period	$	1		$	56	$	67		$	(7	)		$	3		$	63		$	24		$	(1	)
Total gains/(losses) included in earnings	(1		)	—		(2		)	2				3			(32		)	(2		)	—
Purchases and contributions	86			3		—			16				53			—			—			2
Sales	(85		)	—		—			(14		)
Sales and distributions													(38		)	(1		)	—			(1		)
Transfers:
Into Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—			—			—
Out of Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—			—			—
Fair value end of period	$	1		$	59	$	65		$	(3	)		$	21		$	30		$	22		$	—
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings for instruments held at the end of the reporting period	$	1		$	—	$	(2	)	$	—			$	5		$	(32	)	$	(2	)	$	—



Three months ended March 31, 2019 Level 3 instruments at fair value
	Financial assets							Financial liabilities
	Trading instruments			Other investments				Trading instruments
$ in millions	Other			Private equity investments		All other		Other
Fair value beginning of period	$	3		$	59	$	67	$	(4	)
Total gains/(losses) included in earnings	(1		)	—		—		—
Purchases and contributions	22			—		—		4
Sales and distributions	(22		)	—		—		(7		)
Transfers:
Into Level 3	—			—		—		—
Out of Level 3	—			—		—		—
Fair value end of period	$	2		$	59	$	67	$	(7	)
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings for instruments held at the end of the reporting period	$	1		$	—	$	—	$	—


~~(1)~~	Beginning of period balance includes $67 million of preferred ARS, which were reclassified from available-for-sale securities in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-01. See Note 2 for additional information.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


Three months ended June 30, 2018 Level 3 instruments at fair value
Six months ended March 31, 2019 Level 3 instruments at fair value												Six months ended March 31, 2019 Level 3 instruments at fair value
													Financial assets							Financial liabilities
	Financial assets								Financial liabilities				Trading instruments			Other investments				Trading instruments
$ in millions	Trading instruments - Other			Available-for-sale securities - ARS - preferred		Private equity investments			Trading instruments - Other				Other			Private equity investments		All other		Other
Fair value beginning of period	$	1		$	108	$	96		$	(1	)		$	1		$	56	$	67	$	(7	)
Total gains/(losses) for the period:
Included in earnings	—			—		4			—
Included in other comprehensive income	—			3		—			—
Total gains/(losses) included in earnings													—			—		—		2
Purchases and contributions	18			—		—			—				60			3		—		9
Sales	(15		)	—		(28		)	(1		)
Sales and distributions													(59		)	—		—		(11		)
Transfers:
Into Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—		—		—
Out of Level 3	—			—		—			—				—			—		—		—
Fair value end of period	$	4		$	111	$	72		$	(2	)		$	2		$	59	$	67	$	(7	)
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings for instruments held at the end of the reporting period	$	1		$	—	$	—		$	—			$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in other comprehensive income for instruments held at the end of the reporting period	$	—		$	3	$	—		$	—

Nine months ended June 30, 2018
Level 3 instruments at fair value
Financial assets Financial
liabilities
$ in millions Trading instruments - Other
Available-for-sale securities - ARS -
preferred

Private equity
investments
Trading instruments - Other
Fair value beginning of period $ 6
$ 106
$ 89
$ —
Total gains/(losses) for the period:

Included in earnings (1 ) —
11
—
Included in other comprehensive income —
5
—
—
Purchases and contributions 62
—
—
—
Sales (63 ) —
(28 ) (2 )
Transfers:
Into Level 3 —
—
—
—
Out of Level 3 —
—
—
—
Fair value end of period $ 4
$ 111
$ 72
$ (2 )
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings for instruments held at the end of the reporting period $ 1
$ —
$ —
$ —
Unrealized gains/(losses) for the period included in other comprehensive income for instruments held at the end of the reporting period $ —
$ 5
$ —
$ —
The net unrealized losses on our Level 3 private equity investments for the three and six months ended March 31, 2020 were primarily driven by the negative impact of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic on certain of our investments.

As of ~~June~~March 31, 2020, 11% of our assets and 1% of our liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis. In comparison, as of September 30, 2019, 12% of our assets and 2% of our liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ~~In comparison, as~~As of March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018, 10% of our assets and 2% of our liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Instruments~~2019, instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis categorized as Level 3 represented 3%1% and 2%, respectively, of our assets measured at fair ~~value as of both June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018.~~

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

value.

Quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements

The following tables present the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of ~~a significant majority~~certain of our ~~financial instruments~~private equity investments classified as level 3. These inputs represent those that a market participant would take into account when pricing these instruments. Weighted averages are calculated by weighting each input by the relative fair ~~values~~value of the related financial instrument.

Level 3 financial instrument
$ in millions

Fair value at
June 30, 2019
Valuation technique(s) Unobservable input
Range
(weighted-average)
Recurring measurements
Other investments - ARS preferred $ 24
Discounted cash flow Average discount rate 5.35% - 6.35% (5.85%)

Average interest rates applicable to future interest income on the securities ⁽¹⁾
2.31% - 2.31% (2.31%)

Prepayment year ⁽²⁾
2019 - 2022 (2022)
$ 40

Other investment-specific events ⁽³⁾

Not meaningful ⁽³⁾

Not meaningful ⁽³⁾

Private equity investments (not measured at NAV) $ 46
Income approach - discounted cash flow Discount rate 25 %
Terminal EBITDA multiple 10.0x
Terminal year 2022 - 2042 (2023)
$ 13

Transaction price or other investment-specific events ⁽⁴⁾

Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾

Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾

Level 3 financial instrument
$ in millions

Fair value at
September 30, 2018
Valuation technique(s) Unobservable input
Range
(weighted-average)
Recurring measurements
ARS preferred $ 67
Discounted cash flow Average discount rate 6.50% - 7.85% (7.13%)

Average interest rates applicable to future interest income on the securities ⁽¹⁾
4.13% - 5.51% (4.47%)

Prepayment year ⁽²⁾
2018 - 2021 (2021)
Private equity investments
(not measured at NAV)
$ 43
Income approach - discounted cash flow Discount rate 25 %
Terminal EBITDA multiple 10.0x
Terminal year 2022 - 2042 (2023)
$ 13

Transaction price or other investment-specific events ⁽⁴⁾

Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾

Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾

Certain investments are valued initially at transaction price and updated as other investment-specific events take place which indicate that a change in the carrying values of these investments is appropriate. Other investment-specific events include such events as our periodic review, significant transactions occur or new developments become known.


~~(1)~~	Interest rates are projected based upon a forward interest rate path, plus a spread over such projected base rate that is applicable to each future period for each security within this portfolio segment. The interest rates presented represent the average interest rate over all projected periods for securities within the portfolio segment.



Recurring measurements	Fair value at March 31, 2020		Valuation technique(s)	Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)
$ in millions
Other investments - private equity investments (not measured at NAV)	$	30	Discounted cash flow, transaction price or other investment-specific events	Discount rate	25	%
				Terminal earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiple	9.0x
				Terminal year	2021 - 2042 (2024)
	Fair value at September 30, 2019
Other investments - private equity investments (not measured at NAV)	$	63	Discounted cash flow, transaction price or other investment-specific events	Discount rate	25	%
				Terminal EBITDA multiple	12.5x
				Terminal year	2021 - 2042 (2022)


~~(2)~~	~~Assumed calendar year of at least a partial redemption of the outstanding security by the issuer.~~


~~(3)~~	During the third fiscal quarter of 2019, an issuer within our ARS preferred portfolio commenced tender offers to which we tendered holdings with a fair value of $40 million as of June 30, 2019. The tender offers were settled and payment was received in July 2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~(4)~~

Qualitative ~~disclosure~~information about unobservable inputs

For our recurring fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in significant unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those unobservable inputs are described in the following ~~sections.~~

~~Other investments - ARS preferred~~

The future interest rate and prepayment assumptions impacting the valuation of the auction rate securities are directly related. As short-term interest rates rise, the penalty interest rates, which are embedded in most of these securities in the event auctions fail to set the security’s interest rate, also increase. As penalty interest rates rise, we estimate that issuers of the securities will have the economic incentive to refinance (and thus prepay) the securities. As such, increases in interest rates, which would generally result in an earlier

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~prepayment assumption, would have increased the fair value of the securities. Increases in the discount rates would have resulted in a lower fair value of the securities.~~section.

Private equity investments

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of private equity investments generally relate to the financial performance of the investment entity and the market’s required return on investments from entities in industries in which we hold investments. Increases in the discount rate ~~and/or a later terminal year~~ would have resulted in a lower fair value measurement. Increases in the terminal EBITDA multiple would have resulted in a higher fair value measurement. Increases in the terminal year are dependent upon each investment’s strategy, but generally result in a lower fair value measurement.

Investments in private equity measured at net asset value per share

As more fully described in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K, as a practical expedient, we utilize NAV or its equivalent to determine the recorded value of a portion of our private equity investments portfolio. We utilize NAV when the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and the NAV of the fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting, including measurement of the investments at fair value.

Our private equity portfolio ~~as of June 30, 2019 included~~includes various direct investments, as well as investments in third-party private equity funds and various legacy private equity funds which we sponsor. The portfolio is primarily invested in a broad range of industries including leveraged buyouts, growth capital, distressed capital, venture capital and mezzanine capital. Due to the closed-end nature of certain of our fund investments, such investments cannot be redeemed directly with the funds. Our investment is monetized by distributions received through the liquidation of the underlying assets of those funds, the timing of which is uncertain.

The following table presents the recorded value and unfunded commitments related to our private equity investments portfolio.


$ in millions	Recorded value		Unfunded commitment		Recorded value		Unfunded commitment
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Private equity investments measured at NAV	$	87	$	15	$	71	$	12
Private equity investments not measured at NAV	59				30
Total private equity investments	$	146			$	101

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
Private equity investments measured at NAV	$	91	$	18	$	83	$	15
Private equity investments not measured at NAV	56				63
Total private equity investments	$	147			$	146

Of the total private equity investments, the portions we owned were ~~$101~~$79 million and ~~$103~~$99 million as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The portions of the private equity investments we did not own were ~~$45~~$22 million and ~~$44~~$47 million as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, and were included as a component of noncontrolling interests on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Many of these fund investments meet the definition of prohibited covered funds as defined by the Volcker Rule enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of ~~2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).~~2010. We have received approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Fed”) to continue to hold the majority of our covered fund investments until July 2022. However, our current focus is on the divestiture of this portfolio.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis along with the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the assets classified as level 3. These inputs represent those that a market participant would take into account when pricing these instruments. Weighted averages are calculated by weighting each input by the relative fair ~~values~~value of the related financial instrument.


$ in millions	Level 2		Level 3		Total fair value		Valuation technique(s)	Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)	Level 2		Level 3		Total fair value		Valuation technique(s)	Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Bank loans, net:
Impaired loans: residential	$	7	$	15	$	22	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	7 yrs. - 12 yrs. (10.4 yrs.)	$	4	$	14	$	18	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	7 yrs. - 12 yrs. (10.4 yrs.)
Impaired loans: corporate	$	—	$	28	$	28	Collateral or discounted cash flow ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	10	$	10	Collateral or discounted cash flow ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾
Loan held for sale	$	52	$	—	$	52	N/A	N/A	N/A	$	67	$	—	$	67	N/A	N/A	N/A
Other assets: other real estate owned	$	1	$	—	$	1	N/A	N/A	N/A	$	2	$	—	$	2	N/A	N/A	N/A

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
Bank loans, net:
Impaired loans: residential	$	10	$	17	$	27	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	7 yrs. - 12 yrs. (10.5 yrs.)	$	7	$	14	$	21	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	7 yrs. - 12 yrs. (10.4 yrs.)
Impaired loans: corporate	$	—	$	1	$	1	Collateral or discounted cash flow ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	21	$	21	Collateral or discounted cash flow ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾	Not meaningful ⁽¹⁾
Loan held for sale	$	41	$	—	$	41	N/A	N/A	N/A	$	66	$	—	$	66	N/A	N/A	N/A
Other assets: other real estate owned										$	1	$	—	$	1	N/A	N/A	N/A


(1)	The valuation techniques used for the corporate loans are based on collateral value less selling costs for the collateral dependent loans and discounted cash flows for impaired loans that are not collateral dependent.

Financial instruments not ~~measured~~recorded at fair value

Many, but not all, of the financial instruments we hold were recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The following table presents the estimated fair value and fair value hierarchy of financial assets and liabilities that are not recorded at fair value in accordance with GAAP on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial ~~Condition.~~Condition at March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019. This table excludes financial instruments that are carried at amounts which approximate fair value. Refer to Note 4 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of the fair value hierarchy classification of our financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value.

Effective October 1, 2018, we adopted new accounting guidance (ASU 2016-01), which requires the fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value on our statement of financial condition to be estimated utilizing an exit price and eliminates certain disclosure requirements related to these instruments, including exempting certain financial instruments from disclosure (e.g., demand deposits). Prior periods have not been updated to reflect this new accounting guidance.


$ in millions	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total estimated fair value		Carrying amount		Level 2		Level 3		Total estimated fair value		Carrying amount
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Financial assets:
Bank loans, net	$	—	$	81	$	20,474	$	20,555	$	20,589	$	56	$	21,823	$	21,879	$	21,693
Financial liabilities:
Bank deposits - Certificates of deposit	$	—	$	—	$	550	$	550	$	543
Bank deposits - certificates of deposit											$	—	$	1,191	$	1,191	$	1,150
Senior notes payable	$	—	$	1,694	$	—	$	1,694	$	1,550	$	2,208	$	—	$	2,208	$	2,044

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
Financial assets:
Bank loans, net	$	—	$	124	$	19,116	$	19,240	$	19,449	$	75	$	20,710	$	20,785	$	20,783
Financial liabilities:
Bank deposits	$	—	$	19,496	$	439	$	19,935	$	19,942
Bank deposits - certificates of deposit											$	—	$	617	$	617	$	605
Senior notes payable	$	—	$	1,558	$	—	$	1,558	$	1,550	$	1,760	$	—	$	1,760	$	1,550

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 54 – AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES

Available-for-sale securities are primarily comprised of agency MBS and CMOs owned by Raymond James Bank ~~N.A.~~ (“RJ Bank”). Refer to the discussion of our available-for-sale securities accounting policies, including the fair value determination process, in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. As of October 1, 2018, we adopted new accounting guidance related to the classification and measurement of financial instruments (ASU 2016-01), which requires changes in the fair value of equity securities to be recorded in net income. See Note 2 for further information. As a result, on a prospective basis beginning October 1, 2018, unrealized gains/(losses) on our equity securities previously classified and accounted for as available-for-sale are recorded in net income instead of OCI. Accordingly, as of the date of adoption we reclassified approximately $68 million of equity securities, substantially all of which consisted of preferred ARS, from “Available-for-sale securities” to “Other investments” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

The following table details the amortized cost and fair values of our available-for-sale securities.


$ in millions	Cost basis		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value		Cost basis		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
June 30, 2019
Agency residential MBS	$	1,529	$	17	$	(2	)	$	1,544
Agency commercial MBS	285		4		—			289
Agency CMOs	1,125		6		(4		)	1,127
Total available-for-sale securities	$	2,939	$	27	$	(6	)	$	2,960

September 30, 2018
March 31, 2020
Agency residential MBS	$	1,616	$	—	$	(40	)	$	1,576	$	1,929	$	56	$	—		$	1,985
Agency commercial MBS	47		—		—			47		533		16		—			549
Agency CMOs	1,035		—		(30		)	1,005		1,677		39		(1		)	1,715
Other securities	2		—		(1		)	1		15		1		—			16
Total RJ Bank available-for-sale securities	2,700		—		(71		)	2,629
ARS preferred	61		6		—			67
Total available-for-sale securities	$	2,761	$	6	$	(71	)	$	2,696	$	4,154	$	112	$	(1	)	$	4,265

September 30, 2019
Agency residential MBS										$	1,555	$	20	$	(1	)	$	1,574
Agency commercial MBS										305		5		—			310
Agency CMOs										1,195		7		(3		)	1,199
Other securities										10		—		—			10
Total available-for-sale securities										$	3,065	$	32	$	(4	)	$	3,093

See Note 43 for additional information regarding the fair value of available-for-sale securities.

The following table details the contractual maturities, amortized ~~cost,~~costs, carrying values and current yields for our available-for-sale securities. Since our MBS and CMO available-for-sale securities are backed by mortgages, actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. As of March 31, 2020, the duration of our available-for-sale securities portfolio was approximately three years.


	June 30, 2019															March 31, 2020
$ in millions	Within one year			After one but within five years			After five but within ten years			After ten years			Total			Within one year			After one but within five years			After five but within ten years			After ten years			Total
Agency residential MBS
Amortized cost	$	—		$	25		$	869		$	635		$	1,529		$	—		$	32		$	791		$	1,106		$	1,929
Carrying value	$	—		$	25		$	877		$	642		$	1,544		$	—		$	33		$	818		$	1,134		$	1,985
Agency commercial MBS
Amortized cost	$	5		$	214		$	32		$	34		$	285		$	—		$	189		$	265		$	79		$	533
Carrying value	$	5		$	216		$	33		$	35		$	289		$	—		$	193		$	276		$	80		$	549
Agency CMOs
Amortized cost	$	—		$	—		$	92		$	1,033		$	1,125		$	—		$	2		$	79		$	1,596		$	1,677
Carrying value	$	—		$	—		$	92		$	1,035		$	1,127		$	—		$	2		$	81		$	1,632		$	1,715
Other securities
Amortized cost																$	—		$	3		$	12		$	—		$	15
Carrying value																$	—		$	4		$	12		$	—		$	16
Total available-for-sale securities
Amortized cost	$	5		$	239		$	993		$	1,702		$	2,939		$	—		$	226		$	1,147		$	2,781		$	4,154
Carrying value	$	5		$	241		$	1,002		$	1,712		$	2,960		$	—		$	232		$	1,187		$	2,846		$	4,265
Weighted-average yield	1.85		%	2.31		%	2.39		%	2.53		%	2.46		%	—		%	2.28		%	2.34		%	2.25		%	2.27		%

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table details the gross unrealized losses and fair ~~value~~values of securities that were in a loss position at the reporting period end, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.


	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total					Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
$ in millions	Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Agency residential MBS	$	37	$	—		$	397	$	(2	)	$	434	$	(2	)	$	7	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	7	$	—
Agency commercial MBS	—		—			48		—			48		—			14		—			22		—			36		—
Agency CMOs	19		—			529		(4		)	548		(4		)	63		(1		)	18		—			81		(1		)
Total	$	56	$	—		$	974	$	(6	)	$	1,030	$	(6	)	$	84	$	(1	)	$	40	$	—		$	124	$	(1	)
September 30, 2018

September 30, 2019
Agency residential MBS	$	747	$	(15	)	$	753	$	(25	)	$	1,500	$	(40	)	$	166	$	—		$	114	$	(1	)	$	280	$	(1	)
Agency commercial MBS	40		—			6		—			46		—			—		—			44		—			44		—
Agency CMOs	316		(5		)	666		(25		)	982		(30		)	145		(1		)	351		(2		)	496		(3		)
Other securities	—		—			1		(1		)	1		(1		)	2		—			—		—			2		—
Total	$	1,103	$	(20	)	$	1,426	$	(51	)	$	2,529	$	(71	)	$	313	$	(1	)	$	509	$	(3	)	$	822	$	(4	)

~~U.S. government agencies guarantee the~~The contractual cash flows of our available-for-sale securities are guaranteed by the ~~agency MBS and CMOs.~~U.S. government or its agencies. At ~~June 30, 2019~~,March 31, 2020, of the ~~131 agency MBS and CMOs~~20 available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, ~~six~~14 were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and ~~125~~6 were for 12 months or more. We do not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to the guarantee of the full payment of principal and interest, and the fact that we have the ability and intent to hold these securities. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, debt securities we held in excess of ten percent of our equity included Federal National Home Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) which had an amortized cost of ~~$1.85~~$2.67 billion and ~~$833 million,~~$1.22 billion, respectively, and a fair value of ~~$1.86~~$2.74 billion and ~~$839 million,~~$1.25 billion, respectively.

During the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ there were no sales of ~~agency MBS or CMO~~ available-for-sale securities.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 65 – DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Our derivative assets and derivative liabilities are recorded at fair value and are included in “Derivative assets” and “Derivative liabilities” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Cash flows related to our derivatives are included within operating activities inon the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The significant accounting policies governing our derivatives, including our methodologies for determining fair value, are described in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

~~Derivatives arising from our fixed income business operations~~

We enter into interest rate derivatives in our fixed income business to facilitate client transactions or to actively manage risk exposures that arise from our client activity, including a portion of our trading inventory. The majority of these derivatives are traded in the over-the-counter market and are executed directly with another counterparty or are cleared and settled through a clearing organization.

We also facilitate matched book derivative transactions in which Raymond James Financial Products, Inc. (“RJFP”), a wholly owned subsidiary, enters into interest rate derivatives with clients. For every derivative RJFP enters into with a client, it also enters into an offsetting derivative on terms that mirror the client transaction with a credit support provider, which is a third-party financial institution. Any collateral required to be exchanged under these derivatives is administered directly between the client and the third-party financial institution. Due to this pass-through transaction structure, RJFP has completely mitigated the market and credit risk on these derivatives. As a result, derivatives for which the fair value is in an asset position have an equal and offsetting derivative liability. RJFP only has credit risk on its uncollected derivative transaction fee revenues. The receivable for uncollected derivative transaction fee revenues of RJFP was insignificant as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018.

~~Derivatives arising from RJ Bank’s business operations~~

We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge certain exposures arising out of RJ Bank’s business operations. Each of these activities is described in Note 2 of our 2018 Form 10-K and in the following paragraphs.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

We enter into three-month forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge the risks related to RJ Bank’s investment in its Canadian subsidiary, as well as their risk resulting from transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The majority of these derivatives are designated as net investment hedges.

The cash flows associated with certain assets held by RJ Bank provide interest income at fixed interest rates. Therefore, the value of these assets, absent any risk mitigation, is subject to fluctuation based upon changes in market rates of interest over time. RJ Bank enters into floating-rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to, in part, fund these assets and then enters into interest rate contracts which swap variable interest payments on this debt for fixed interest payments. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and effectively fix RJ Bank’s cost of funds associated with these assets to mitigate a portion of the market risk.

~~Derivative arising from our acquisition of Alex. Brown~~

As part of our acquisition of Alex. Brown (see Note 3 of our 2018 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the acquisition), we assumed certain DBRSU awards, which will ultimately be settled in Deutsche Bank AG (“DB”) common shares, provided certain performance metrics are achieved. The DBRSU obligation results in a derivative, the fair value and notional of which is measured by multiplying the number of outstanding DBRSU awards to be settled in DB common shares as of the end of the reporting period by the end of reporting period DB share price, as traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

~~Counterparty netting and collateral related to derivatives~~

To reduce credit exposure on certain of our derivative transactions, we may enter into a master netting arrangement that allows for net settlement of all derivatives with each counterparty. In addition, the credit support annex allows parties to the master netting agreement to mitigate their credit risk by requiring the party which is out of the money to post collateral. We accept collateral in the form of cash or other marketable securities. Where permitted, we elect to net-by-counterparty certain derivatives entered into under a legally enforceable master netting agreement and, therefore, the fair value of those derivatives are netted by counterparty on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. As we elect to net-by-counterparty the fair value of such derivatives, we also net-by-counterparty cash collateral exchanged as part of those derivative agreements. We may also require certain counterparties to make a deposit at the inception of a derivative agreement, referred to as “initial margin.” This initial margin is included in “Other payables” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

We are also required to maintain deposits with the clearing organizations we utilize to clear certain of our interest rate derivatives. This initial margin is included as a component of “Other investments” or “Available-for-sale securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. On a daily basis, we also pay cash to or receive cash from these clearing organizations due to changes in the fair value of the derivatives which they clear. Such payments are referred to as “variation margin” and are considered to be settlement of the related derivatives.

Due to the short-term nature of forward foreign exchange contracts, RJ Bank is generally not required to post collateral with and does not generally receive collateral from its respective counterparties.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Derivative balances included inon our financial statements

The following table presents the gross fair value and notional amount of derivatives by product type, the amounts of counterparty and cash collateral netting on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, as well as collateral posted and received under credit support agreements that do not meet the criteria for netting under GAAP.


	June 30, 2019								September 30, 2018								March 31, 2020								September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Notional amount		Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Notional amount		Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Notional amount		Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Notional amount
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate:
Matched book	$	246		$	246		$	2,325	$	160		$	160		$	2,416
Other ⁽¹⁾	133			117			10,197		74			113			9,398
Interest rate - matched book																	$	351		$	351		$	2,265	$	280		$	280		$	2,296
Interest rate - other ⁽¹⁾																	359			286			16,686		184			146			10,690
Foreign exchange	1			1			552		1			1			549		—			3			576		—			1			573
Equity - DBRSU obligation	—			7			7		—			16			16
Equity																	—			1			1		—			6			6
Subtotal	380			371			13,081		235			290			12,379		710			641			19,528		464			433			13,565
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate	4			1			850		—			1			850		—			1			850		1			—			850
Foreign exchange	—			3			853		—			3			892		—			3			816		—			1			856
Subtotal	4			4			1,703		—			4			1,742		—			4			1,666		1			1			1,706
Total gross fair value/notional amount	384			375			$	14,784	235			294			$	14,121	710			645			$	21,194	465			434			$	15,271
Offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Counterparty netting	(16		)	(16		)			(26		)	(26		)			(93		)	(93		)			(24		)	(24		)
Cash collateral netting	(64		)	(84		)			(29		)	(21		)			(170		)	(125		)			(103		)	(97		)
Total amounts offset	(80		)	(100		)			(55		)	(47		)			(263		)	(218		)			(127		)	(121		)
Net amounts presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	304			275					180			247					447			427					338			313
Gross amounts not offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Financial instruments ⁽²⁾	(259		)	(246		)			(162		)	(160		)			(372		)	(351		)			(297		)	(280		)
Total	$	45		$	29				$	18		$	87				$	75		$	76				$	41		$	33


(1)	Substantially all relates to interest rate derivatives entered into as part of our fixed income business operations, including to be announced (“TBA”) security contracts that are accounted for as derivatives.


(2)	Although the matched book derivative arrangements do not meet the definition of a master netting arrangement as specified by GAAP, the agreement with the third-party intermediary includes terms that are similar to a master netting agreement. As a result, we present the matched book amounts net in the preceding table.

The following table details the gains/(losses) included in ~~AOCI,~~accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of income taxes, on derivatives designated as hedging instruments. These gains/(losses) ~~include~~included any amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income during the period. See Note 1516 for additional information.


	Three months ended June 30,					Nine months ended June 30,					Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018		2019			2018		2020			2019			2020			2019
Interest rate (cash flow hedges)	$	(19	)	$	6	$	(49	)	$	27	$	(43	)	$	(13	)	$	(33	)	$	(30	)
Foreign exchange (net investment hedges)	(12		)	13		14			38		52			(11		)	39			26
Total gains/(losses) in AOCI, net of taxes	$	(31	)	$	19	$	(35	)	$	65	$	9		$	(24	)	$	6		$	(4	)

There were no0 components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness for each of the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. We expect to reclassify ~~an insignificant amount~~$12 million of interest expense out of AOCI and into earnings within the next 12 months. The maximum length of time over which forecasted transactions are or will be hedged is 8 years.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table details the gains/(losses) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments recognized inon the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.


$ in millions	Location of gain/(loss) included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income	Gain/(loss) recognized during the										Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
		three months ended June 30,					nine months ended June 30,				Location of gain/(loss)	2020			2019			2020			2019
		2019			2018		2019		2018
Interest rate	Principal transactions/other revenues	$	2		$	3	$	4	$	5	Principal transactions/other revenues	$	—		$	—		$	5		$	2
Foreign exchange	Other revenues	$	(8	)	$	15	$	14	$	24	Other revenues	$	43		$	(4	)	$	32		$	22
Equity - DBRSU obligation	Compensation, commissions and benefits expense	$	—		$	4	$	5	$	9
Equity											Compensation, commissions and benefits expense	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(1	)	$	5

Risks associated with our derivatives and ~~our~~related risk mitigation ~~related to, our derivative contracts~~

Credit risk

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to forward foreign exchange derivative agreements and interest rate derivatives that are not cleared through a clearing organization. Where we are subject to credit exposure, we perform a credit evaluation of counterparties prior to entering into derivative transactions and we monitor their credit standings. We may require initial margin or collateral from counterparties in the form of cash deposits or other marketable securities to support certain of these obligations as established by the credit threshold specified by the agreement and/or as a result of monitoring the credit standing of the counterparties.

Our only exposure to credit risk in the matched book derivatives operations is related to our uncollected derivative transaction fee ~~revenues.~~revenues, which were insignificant as of both March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019. We are not exposed to market risk on these derivatives due to the pass-through transaction structure ~~previously described.~~described in Note 2 of our 2019 Form 10-K.

Interest rate and foreign exchange risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk related to certain of our interest rate derivatives. We are also exposed to foreign exchange risk related to our forward foreign exchange derivatives. On a daily basis, we monitor our risk exposure on our derivatives based on established limits with respect to a number of factors, including interest rate, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, spread, ratio, basis and volatility ~~risks. These exposures are monitored~~risks, both ~~on a~~for the total portfolio ~~basis~~ and ~~separately for each agreement for selected~~by maturity ~~periods.~~period.

Derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features

Certain of our derivative contracts contain provisions that require our debt to maintain an investment-grade rating from ~~one~~1 or more of the major credit rating agencies. If our debt were to fall below investment-grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could terminate and request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing overnight collateralization on our derivative instruments in liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position was insignificant as of both ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 76 – COLLATERALIZED AGREEMENTS AND FINANCINGS

Collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”) and securities borrowed. Collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) and securities loaned. We enter into these transactions in order to facilitate client activities, invest excess cash, acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities. The significant accounting policies governing our collateralized agreements and financings are described in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

For financial statement purposes, we do not offset our reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowing and securities lending transactions because the conditions for netting as specified by GAAP are not met. Our reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowing and securities lending transactions are governed by master agreements that are widely used by counterparties and that may allow for net settlements of payments in the normal course, as well as offsetting of all contracts with a given counterparty in the event of bankruptcy or default of one of the parties to the transaction. Although not offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, these transactions are included in the following table.


	Assets						Liabilities						Assets						Liabilities
$ in millions	Reverse repurchase agreements			Securities borrowed			Repurchase agreements			Securities loaned			Reverse repurchase agreements			Securities borrowed			Repurchase agreements			Securities loaned
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities	$	411		$	306		$	165		$	429		$	130		$	250		$	215		$	28
Gross amounts offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net amounts presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	411			306			165			429			130			250			215			28
Gross amounts not offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	(411		)	(301		)	(165		)	(419		)	(130		)	(240		)	(215		)	(24		)
Net amounts	$	—		$	5		$	—		$	10		$	—		$	10		$	—		$	4
September 30, 2018

September 30, 2019
Gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities	$	373		$	255		$	186		$	423		$	343		$	248		$	150		$	323
Gross amounts offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net amounts presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	373			255			186			423			343			248			150			323
Gross amounts not offset on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	(373		)	(248		)	(186		)	(408		)	(343		)	(243		)	(150		)	(311		)
Net amounts	$	—		$	7		$	—		$	15		$	—		$	5		$	—		$	12

~~The required market value of the collateral associated with collateralized agreements and financings generally exceeds the amount financed. Accordingly, the total~~Total collateral received under reverse repurchase agreements and the total amount of collateral posted under repurchase agreements exceeds the carrying value of these agreements on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In the event the market value of the securities we pledge as collateral in these activities declines, we may have to post additional collateral or reduce the borrowing amounts. We monitor such levels daily.

Collateral received and pledged

We receive cash and securities as collateral, primarily in connection with reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowed, derivative transactions and client margin loans. The collateral we receive reduces our credit exposure to individual counterparties.

In many cases, we are permitted to deliver or repledge financial instruments we have received as collateral into satisfy our collateral requirements under our repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements or other secured borrowings, ~~satisfaction of~~to satisfy deposit requirements with clearing organizations, or to otherwise ~~meeting~~meet either our or our clients’ settlement requirements.

The following table presents financial instruments at fair value that we received as collateral, were not included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, and that were available to be delivered or repledged, along with the balances of such instruments that were delivered or repledged, to satisfy one of our purposes previously described.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Collateral we received that was available to be delivered or repledged	$	3,093	$	3,165	$	2,503	$	2,931
Collateral that we delivered or repledged	$	1,195	$	1,389	$	763	$	897

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Encumbered assets

We pledge certain of our ~~financial instruments~~assets to collateralize either repurchase agreements or other secured borrowings, maintain lines of credit, or to satisfy our collateral or settlement requirements with counterparties or clearing organizations who may or may not have the right to deliver or repledge such instruments. The following table presents information about ~~the fair value of~~ our assets that have been pledged for one of the purposes previously described.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Financial instruments owned, at fair value, pledged to counterparties that:
Had the right to deliver or repledge	$	597	$	510	$	304	$	591
Did not have the right to deliver or repledge	$	65	$	65	$	65	$	65
Bank loans, net pledged at FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank	$	4,563	$	4,075
Bank loans, net pledged at Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank					$	5,157	$	4,653

Repurchase agreements, repurchase-to-maturity transactions and securities loaned accounted for as secured borrowings

The following table presents the remaining contractual maturity of repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings.


$ in millions	Overnight and continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total		Overnight and continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Repurchase agreements:
Government and agency obligations	$	48	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	48	$	45	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	45
Agency MBS and CMOs	117		—		—		—		117		170		—		—		—		170
Total repurchase agreements	165		—		—		—		165		215		—		—		—		215
Securities loaned:
Equity securities	429		—		—		—		429		28		—		—		—		28
Total	$	594	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	594	$	243	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	243

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
Repurchase agreements:
Government and agency obligations	$	102	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	102	$	70	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	70
Agency MBS and CMOs	84		—		—		—		84		80		—		—		—		80
Total repurchase agreements	186		—		—		—		186		150		—		—		—		150
Securities loaned:
Equity securities	423		—		—		—		423		323		—		—		—		323
Total	$	609	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	609	$	473	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	473

As of both ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we did ~~not~~0t have any “repurchase-to-maturity” agreements, which are repurchase agreements where a security is transferred under an agreement to repurchase and the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security.

NOTE 87 – BANK LOANS, NET

Bank client receivables are comprised of loans originated or purchased by RJ Bank and include commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans, tax-exempt loans, ~~securities-based and other loans (“SBL and other”), and~~ commercial and residential real estate loans, securities-based loans (“SBL”) and other loans. These receivables are collateralized by first and, to a lesser extent, second mortgages on residential or other real property, other assets of the borrower, a pledge of revenue or are unsecured. See Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of accounting policies related to bank loans and allowances for losses.

We segregate our loan portfolio into ~~six~~6 loan portfolio segments: C&I, commercial real estate (“CRE”), CRE construction, tax-exempt, residential mortgage, and SBL and other. These portfolio segments also serve as the portfolio loan classes for purposes of credit analysis, except for residential mortgage loans which are further disaggregated into residential first mortgage and residential home equity classes.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the balances for both the held for sale and held for investment loan portfolios, as well as the associated percentage of each portfolio segment in RJ Bank’s total loan portfolio. “Loans held for sale, net” and “Total loans held for investment, net” in the following table are presented net of unearned income and deferred expenses, which include purchase premiums, purchase discounts and net deferred origination fees and costs.


	June 30, 2019					September 30, 2018					March 31, 2020					September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Balance			%		Balance			%		Balance			%		Balance			%
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	$	8,401		40	%	$	7,786		40	%	$	8,316		38	%	$	8,098		38	%
CRE construction loans	248			1	%	151			1	%	180			1	%	185			1	%
CRE loans	3,468			17	%	3,624			18	%	3,830			17	%	3,652			17	%
Tax-exempt loans	1,296			6	%	1,227			6	%	1,266			5	%	1,241			6	%
Residential mortgage loans	4,198			20	%	3,757			19	%	4,864			22	%	4,454			21	%
SBL and other	3,177			15	%	3,033			15	%	3,546			16	%	3,349			16	%
Total loans held for investment	20,788					19,578					22,002					20,979
Net unearned income and deferred expenses	(16		)			(21		)			(13		)			(12		)
Total loans held for investment, net	20,772					19,557					21,989					20,967
Loans held for sale, net	134			1	%	164			1	%	123			1	%	142			1	%
Total loans held for sale and investment	20,906			100	%	19,721			100	%	22,112			100	%	21,109			100	%
Allowance for loan losses	(215		)			(203		)			(324		)			(218		)
Bank loans, net	$	20,691				$	19,518				$	21,788				$	20,891

At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the FHLB had a blanket lien on RJ Bank’s residential mortgage loan portfolio as security for the repayment of certain borrowings. See Note 12 for more information regarding borrowings from the FHLB.

Loans held for sale

RJ Bank originated or purchased ~~$522~~$443 million and ~~$1.79~~$1.15 billion of loans held for sale during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, respectively, and ~~$444~~$475 million and ~~$1.13~~$1.27 billion during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of these held for sale loans amounted to ~~$159~~$220 million and ~~$516~~$434 million during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, respectively, and ~~$166~~$100 million and ~~$394~~$357 million during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, respectively. Net gains resulting from such sales were insignificant in all periods during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Purchases and sales of loans held for investment

The following table presents purchases and sales of any loans held for investment by portfolio segment.


$ in millions	C&I loans		CRE loans		Residential mortgage loans		Total		C&I loans		CRE loans		Residential mortgage loans		Total
Three months ended June 30, 2019
Three months ended March 31, 2020
Purchases	$	247	$	10	$	132	$	389	$	296	$	5	$	100	$	401
Sales	$	7	$	—	$	—	$	7	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Nine months ended June 30, 2019
Six months ended March 31, 2020
Purchases	$	937	$	35	$	254	$	1,226	$	363	$	5	$	258	$	626
Sales	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100	$	20	$	—	$	—	$	20
Three months ended June 30, 2018
Three months ended March 31, 2019
Purchases	$	195	$	82	$	123	$	400	$	428	$	25	$	46	$	499
Sales	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	38	$	24	$	—	$	—	$	24
Nine months ended June 30, 2018
Six months ended March 31, 2019
Purchases	$	467	$	145	$	217	$	829	$	690	$	25	$	122	$	837
Sales	$	146	$	—	$	—	$	146	$	93	$	—	$	—	$	93

Sales in the preceding table represent the recorded investment of loans held for investment that were transferred to loans held for sale and subsequently sold to a third party during the respective period. As more fully described in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K, corporate loan (C&I, CRE and CRE construction) sales generally occur as part of our credit management activities.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Aging analysis of loans held for investment

The following table presents an analysis of the payment status of loans held for investment. Amounts in the table exclude any net unearned income and deferred expenses.


$ in millions	30-89 days and accruing		90 days or more and accruing		Total past due and accruing		Nonaccrual		Current and accruing		Total loans held for investment		30-89 days and accruing		90 days or more and accruing		Total past due and accruing		Nonaccrual		Current and accruing		Total loans held for investment
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
C&I loans	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	22	$	8,379	$	8,401	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4	$	8,312	$	8,316
CRE construction loans	—		—		—		—		248		248		—		—		—		—		180		180
CRE loans	—		—		—		10		3,458		3,468		—		—		—		6		3,824		3,830
Tax-exempt loans	—		—		—		—		1,296		1,296		—		—		—		—		1,266		1,266
Residential mortgage loans:
First mortgage loans	1		5		6		16		4,148		4,170		1		—		1		14		4,824		4,839
Home equity loans/lines	—		—		—		—		28		28		—		—		—		—		25		25
SBL and other	—		—		—		—		3,177		3,177		—		—		—		—		3,546		3,546
Total loans held for investment	$	1	$	5	$	6	$	48	$	20,734	$	20,788	$	1	$	—	$	1	$	24	$	21,977	$	22,002

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
C&I loans	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	7,784	$	7,786	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	19	$	8,079	$	8,098
CRE construction loans	—		—		—		—		151		151		—		—		—		—		185		185
CRE loans	—		—		—		—		3,624		3,624		—		—		—		8		3,644		3,652
Tax-exempt loans	—		—		—		—		1,227		1,227		—		—		—		—		1,241		1,241
Residential mortgage loans:
First mortgage loans	1		—		1		23		3,707		3,731		2		—		2		16		4,409		4,427
Home equity loans/lines	—		—		—		—		26		26		—		—		—		—		27		27
SBL and other	—		—		—		—		3,033		3,033		—		—		—		—		3,349		3,349
Total loans held for investment	$	1	$	—	$	1	$	25	$	19,552	$	19,578	$	2	$	—	$	2	$	43	$	20,934	$	20,979

The preceding table includes ~~$37~~$9 million and ~~$11~~$32 million at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, of nonaccrual loans which were current pursuant to their contractual terms.

Other real estate owned, included in “Other assets” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, was $3 million at both ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The recorded investment in mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process was ~~$8 million and $12~~$7 million at ~~June 30, 2019~~both March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018, respectively.~~2019.

Impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings

The following table provides a summary of RJ Bank’s impaired loans.


	June 30, 2019						September 30, 2018						March 31, 2020						September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Gross recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Allowance for losses		Gross recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Allowance for losses		Gross recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Allowance for losses		Gross recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Allowance for losses
Impaired loans with allowance for loan losses:
C&I loans	$	19	$	19	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4	$	4	$	1	$	19	$	20	$	6
Residential - first mortgage loans	11		14		1		15		20		2		8		10		1		11		13		1
Total	30		33		5		15		20		2		12		14		2		30		33		7
Impaired loans without allowance for loan losses:
C&I loans	3		3		—		2		2		—
CRE loans	10		13		—		—		—		—		7		12		—		8		13		—
Residential - first mortgage loans	12		19		—		13		20		—		11		17		—		11		17		—
Total	25		35		—		15		22		—		18		29		—		19		30		—
Total impaired loans	$	55	$	68	$	5	$	30	$	42	$	2	$	30	$	43	$	2	$	49	$	63	$	7

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Impaired loan balances with allowances for loan losses have had reserves established based upon management’s analysis. There is no allowance required when the discounted cash flow, collateral value or market value of a loan equals or exceeds the carrying value. These are generally loans in process of foreclosure that have already been adjusted to fair value.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The preceding table includes CRE and residential first mortgage loans troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) of ~~$10~~$7 million and ~~$19~~$17 million, ~~related to~~respectively, at March 31, 2020 and C&I, CRE and residential first mortgage loans ~~respectively, at June 30, 2019~~TDRs of $19 million, $8 million and ~~$21~~$18 million, ~~of residential first mortgage TDRs~~respectively, at September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

The average balance of the total impaired loans was as follows.


	Three months ended June 30,				Nine months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Average impaired loan balance:
C&I loans	$	26	$	4	$	19	$	4	$	9	$	27	$	13	$	16
CRE loans	10		—		4		—		7		3		7		2
Residential - first mortgage loans	24		34		25		34		20		25		21		26
Total	$	60	$	38	$	48	$	38
Total average impaired loan balance									$	36	$	55	$	41	$	44

Credit quality indicators

The credit quality of RJ Bank’s loan portfolio is summarized monthly by management using the standard asset classification system utilized by bank regulators for the SBL ~~and other~~ and residential mortgage loan portfolios and internal risk ratings, which correspond to the same standard asset classifications for the corporate loan portfolios. These classifications are divided into three groups: Not Classified (Pass), Special Mention, and Classified or Adverse Rating (Substandard, Doubtful and Loss). These terms are defined as follows:

Pass – Loans which are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or guarantors, if any) or by the fair value, less costs to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.

Special Mention – Loans which have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. These loans are not adversely classified and do not expose RJ Bank to sufficient risk to warrant an adverse classification.

Substandard – Loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans with this classification are characterized by the distinct possibility that RJ Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans which have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently-known facts, conditions and values.

Loss – Loans which are considered by management to be uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance on ~~RJ Bank’s~~our books as an asset, without establishment of a specific valuation allowance or charge-off, is not warranted. ~~RJ Bank does~~We do not have any bank loan balances within this classification because, in accordance with ~~its~~our accounting policy, loans, or a portion thereof considered to be uncollectible, are charged-off prior to the assignment of this classification.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the credit quality of RJ Bank’s held for investment loan portfolio.


$ in millions	Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total			Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
C&I loans	$	8,296	$	22	$	83	$	—	$	8,401		$	8,045	$	142	$	129	$	—	$	8,316
CRE construction loans	248		—		—		—		248			180		—		—		—		180
CRE loans	3,410		20		38		—		3,468			3,745		36		49		—		3,830
Tax-exempt loans	1,296		—		—		—		1,296			1,266		—		—		—		1,266
Residential mortgage loans:
First mortgage loans	4,136		8		26		—		4,170			4,808		8		23		—		4,839
Home equity loans/lines	28		—		—		—		28			25		—		—		—		25
SBL and other	3,177		—		—		—		3,177			3,546		—		—		—		3,546
Total	$	20,591	$	50	$	147	$	—	$	20,788
Total loans held for investment												$	21,615	$	186	$	201	$	—	$	22,002

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019											September 30, 2019
C&I loans	$	7,679	$	48	$	59	$	—	$	7,786		$	7,870	$	152	$	76	$	—	$	8,098
CRE construction loans	140		11		—		—		151			185		—		—		—		185
CRE loans	3,547		44		33		—		3,624			3,630		—		22		—		3,652
Tax-exempt loans	1,227		—		—		—		1,227			1,241		—		—		—		1,241
Residential mortgage loans:
First mortgage loans	3,693		8		30		—		3,731			4,392		10		25		—		4,427
Home equity loans/lines	26		—		—		—		26			27		—		—		—		27
SBL and other	3,033		—		—		—		3,033			3,349		—		—		—		3,349
Total	$	19,345	$	111	$	122	$	—	$	19,578
Total loans held for investment												$	20,694	$	162	$	123	$	—	$	20,979

Loans classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful are all considered to be “criticized” loans.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments

The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses of RJ Bank by portfolio segment.


	Loans held for investment																			Loans held for investment
$ in millions	C&I loans			CRE construction loans		CRE loans			Tax-exempt loans		Residential mortgage loans			SBL and other			Total			C&I loans			CRE construction loans		CRE loans			Tax-exempt loans			Residential mortgage loans			SBL and other		Total
Three months ended June 30, 2019
Three months ended March 31, 2020
Balance at beginning of period	$	140		$	3	$	45		$	8	$	17		$	5		$	218		$	139		$	2	$	46		$	8		$	17		$	4	$	216
Provision/(benefit) for loan losses	(8		)	1		1			1		(1		)	1			(5		)
Provision for loan losses																				59			1		42			3			1			3		109
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries:
Charge-offs	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Recoveries	1			—		—			—		—			—			1			—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Net charge-offs	1			—		—			—		—			—			1
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries																				—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Foreign exchange translation adjustment	1					—			—		—			—			1			(1		)	—		—			—			—			—		(1		)
Balance at end of period	$	134		$	4	$	46		$	9	$	16		$	6		$	215		$	197		$	3	$	88		$	11		$	18		$	7	$	324

Nine months ended June 30, 2019
Six months ended March 31, 2020
Balance at beginning of period																				$	139		$	3	$	46		$	9		$	16		$	5	$	218
Provision for loan losses																				59			—		42			2			2			2		107
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries:
Charge-offs																				—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Recoveries																				—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries																				—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Foreign exchange translation adjustment																				(1		)	—		—			—			—			—		(1		)
Balance at end of period																				$	197		$	3	$	88		$	11		$	18		$	7	$	324

Three months ended March 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	123		$	3	$	47		$	9	$	17		$	4		$	203		$	137		$	3	$	46		$	9		$	19		$	5	$	219
Provision/(benefit) for loan losses	13			1		2			—		(2		)	2			16			6			—		2			(1		)	(2		)	—		5
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries:
Charge-offs	(3		)	—		(3		)	—					—			(6		)	(3		)	—		(3		)	—			—			—		(6		)
Recoveries	1			—		—			—		1			—			2			—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries	(2		)	—		(3		)	—		1			—			(4		)	(3		)	—		(3		)	—			—			—		(6		)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—		—
Balance at end of period	$	134		$	4	$	46		$	9	$	16		$	6		$	215		$	140		$	3	$	45		$	8		$	17		$	5	$	218

Three months ended June 30, 2018
Six months ended March 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	125		$	2	$	43		$	8	$	13		$	4		$	195		$	123		$	3	$	47		$	9		$	17		$	4	$	203
Provision/(benefit) for loan losses	2			1		2			—		1			(1		)	5			21			—		1			(1		)	(1		)	1		21
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries:
Charge-offs	(5		)	—		—			—		—			—			(5		)	(3		)	—		(3		)	—			—			—		(6		)
Recoveries	—			—		—			—		1			—			1			—			—		—			—			1			—		1
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries	(5		)	—		—			—		1			—			(4		)	(3		)	—		(3		)	—			1			—		(5		)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(1		)	—		—			—			—			—		(1		)
Balance at end of period	$	122		$	3	$	45		$	8	$	15		$	3		$	196		$	140		$	3	$	45		$	8		$	17		$	5	$	218

Nine months ended June 30, 2018
Balance at beginning of period	$	120		$	1	$	42		$	6	$	17		$	4		$	190
Provision/(benefit) for loan losses	11			2		3			2		(3		)	(1		)	14
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries:
Charge-offs	(9		)	—		—			—		—			—			(9		)
Recoveries	—			—		—			—		1			—			1
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries	(9		)	—		—			—		1			—			(8		)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment	—			—		—			—		—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	122		$	3	$	45		$	8	$	15		$	3		$	196

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents, by loan portfolio segment, RJ Bank’s recorded investment (excluding any net unearned income and deferred expenses) and the related allowance for loan losses.


	Loans held for investment												Loans held for investment
	Allowance for loan losses						Recorded investment						Allowance for loan losses						Recorded investment
$ in millions	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total		Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total		Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total		Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
C&I loans	$	4	$	130	$	134	$	22	$	8,379	$	8,401	$	1	$	196	$	197	$	4	$	8,312	$	8,316
CRE construction loans	—		4		4		—		248		248		—		3		3		—		180		180
CRE loans	—		46		46		10		3,458		3,468		—		88		88		6		3,824		3,830
Tax-exempt loans	—		9		9		—		1,296		1,296		—		11		11		—		1,266		1,266
Residential mortgage loans	1		15		16		28		4,170		4,198		1		17		18		25		4,839		4,864
SBL and other	—		6		6		—		3,177		3,177		—		7		7		—		3,546		3,546
Total	$	5	$	210	$	215	$	60	$	20,728	$	20,788	$	2	$	322	$	324	$	35	$	21,967	$	22,002

September 30, 2018
September 30, 2019
C&I loans	$	—	$	123	$	123	$	2	$	7,784	$	7,786	$	6	$	133	$	139	$	19	$	8,079	$	8,098
CRE construction loans	—		3		3		—		151		151		—		3		3		—		185		185
CRE loans	—		47		47		—		3,624		3,624		—		46		46		8		3,644		3,652
Tax-exempt loans	—		9		9		—		1,227		1,227		—		9		9		—		1,241		1,241
Residential mortgage loans	2		15		17		35		3,722		3,757		1		15		16		28		4,426		4,454
SBL and other	—		4		4		—		3,033		3,033		—		5		5		—		3,349		3,349
Total	$	2	$	201	$	203	$	37	$	19,541	$	19,578	$	7	$	211	$	218	$	55	$	20,924	$	20,979

The reserve for unfunded lending commitments, which is included in “Other payables” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, was ~~$10~~$9 million at both ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018~~2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 98 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

A VIE requires consolidation by the entity’s primary beneficiary. We evaluate all of the entities in which we are involved to determine if the entity is a VIE and if so, whether we hold a variable interest and are the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our principal involvement with VIEs and the accounting policies regarding determination of whether we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of VIEs.

VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary

Of the VIEs in which we hold an interest, we have determined that certain limited partnerships which are part of our private equity ~~investments~~ portfolio (“Private Equity Interests”), acertain Low-Income Housing Tax Credit ~~fund~~ (“~~LIHTC fund”~~LIHTC”) in which RJ Bank is an investor and an affiliate of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. (“RJTCF”) is the managing member, a multi-investor LIHTC fund where RJTCF provides an investor member with a guaranteed return on their investment (“Guaranteed LIHTC Fund”), certain other LIHTC funds and the trust we utilize in connection with restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards granted to certain employees of one of our Canadian subsidiaries (the “Restricted Stock Trust Fund”) require consolidation in our financial statements, as we are deemed the primary beneficiary of such VIEs. The aggregate assets and liabilities of the VIEs we consolidate are provided in the following table. Aggregate assets and aggregate liabilities may differ from the consolidated carrying value of assets and liabilities due to the elimination of intercompany assets and liabilities held by the consolidated VIE.

$ in millions Aggregate assets Aggregate liabilities
June 30, 2019
Private Equity Interests $ 69
$ 4
LIHTC fund in which RJ Bank is an investor member 61
—
Guaranteed LIHTC Fund 18
3
Other LIHTC funds 26
28
Restricted Stock Trust Fund 19
19
Total $ 193
$ 54

September 30, 2018

Private Equity Interests $ 67
$ 5
LIHTC fund in which RJ Bank is an investor member 53
—
Guaranteed LIHTC Fund 40
3
Other LIHTC funds 18
18
Restricted Stock Trust Fund 14
14
Total $ 192
$ 40



$ in millions	Aggregate assets		Aggregate liabilities
March 31, 2020
Private Equity Interests	$	34	$	4
LIHTC funds	75		5
Restricted Stock Trust Fund	19		19
Total	$	128	$	28

September 30, 2019
Private Equity Interests	$	65	$	4
LIHTC funds	80		5
Restricted Stock Trust Fund	14		14
Total	$	159	$	23

See Note 14 of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding the commitment related to the Guaranteed LIHTC Fund and Note 9 of our 2018 Form 10-K for information regarding the financing asset associated with this fund.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

The following table presents information about the carrying value of the assets ~~liabilities~~ and ~~equity~~liabilities of the VIEs which we consolidate and which are included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. ~~The noncontrolling interests presented~~Intercompany balances are eliminated in ~~this table represent~~consolidation and not reflected in the ~~portion of these net assets which are not ours.~~following table.

$ in millions June 30, 2019 September 30, 2018
Assets:
Cash, cash equivalents and cash segregated pursuant to regulations $ 20
$ 7
Intercompany and other receivables —
1
Private equity investments 62
63
Investments in real estate partnerships held by consolidated variable interest entities 69
107
Trust fund investment in RJF common stock 19
14
Other assets 23
—
Total assets $ 193
$ 192

Liabilities and equity:

Other payables $ 29
$ 27
Intercompany payables 22
17
Total liabilities 51
44
RJF equity 79
70
Noncontrolling interests 63
78
Total equity 142
148
Total liabilities and equity $ 193
$ 192



$ in millions	March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Assets:
Cash, cash equivalents and cash segregated pursuant to regulations	$	6	$	7
Other investments	33		63
Other assets	70		75
Total assets	$	109	$	145
Liabilities:
Other payables	$	4	$	4
Total liabilities	$	4	$	4
Noncontrolling interests	$	35	$	60

The trust fund investment in RJF common stock in the preceding table relates to the Restricted Stock Trust Fund, which is included in “Treasury stock” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

VIEs where we hold a variable interest but are not the primary beneficiary

As discussed in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K, we have concluded that for certain VIEs we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore do not consolidate these VIEs. Such VIEs include certain Private Equity Interests, certain LIHTC funds, and other limited partnerships. Our risk of loss for these VIEs is limited to our investments in, advances to, and/or receivables due from these VIEs.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Aggregate assets, liabilities and risk of loss

The aggregate assets, liabilities, and our exposure to loss from those VIEs in which we hold a variable interest, but as to which we have concluded we are not the primary beneficiary, are provided in the following table.


	June 30, 2019						September 30, 2018						March 31, 2020						September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Aggregate assets		Aggregate liabilities		Our risk of loss		Aggregate assets		Aggregate liabilities		Our risk of loss		Aggregate assets		Aggregate liabilities		Our risk of loss		Aggregate assets		Aggregate liabilities		Our risk of loss
Private Equity Interests	$	6,170	$	155	$	66	$	6,908	$	154	$	68	$	5,175	$	128	$	59	$	6,317	$	117	$	63
LIHTC funds	5,776		2,167		62		5,692		1,912		93		6,500		2,041		40		6,001		2,221		64
Other	222		125		4		211		114		4		220		129		4		205		115		4
Total	$	12,168	$	2,447	$	132	$	12,811	$	2,180	$	165	$	11,895	$	2,298	$	103	$	12,523	$	2,453	$	131

NOTE 109 - GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Our goodwill and identified intangible assets result from various acquisitions. See ~~Notes~~Note 2 and 1211 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for information about our goodwill and intangible assets, including the related accounting policies.

We had an addition to goodwill of $7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019 due to our acquisition of Silver Lane. See Note 3 of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding this acquisition.

We perform goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value or indicate that

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

the asset is impaired. We performed our latest annual impairment testing for our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset as of our January 1, ~~2019~~2020 evaluation date, evaluating balances as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We performed a qualitative impairment assessment for each of our reporting units that had goodwill, as well as for our indefinite-lived intangible asset. Based upon the outcome of our qualitative assessments, 0 impairment was identified.

Our qualitative assessments consider macroeconomic indicators, such as trends in equity and fixed income markets, ~~GDP,~~gross domestic product, unemployment rates, interest rates, housing markets and trade policy. We also consider regulatory changes, reporting unit specific results, and changes in key personnel and strategy. Changes in these indicators, and our ability to respond to such changes, may trigger the need for impairment testing at a point other than our annual assessment date. ~~Based upon~~

Subsequent to our annual impairment testing, as a result of a deterioration in market conditions due to the ~~outcome~~COVID-19 pandemic, we performed an evaluation to determine whether the economic impacts resulting from the pandemic were indicators requiring us to perform an impairment test as of March 31, 2020. Multiple factors, including performance, macroeconomic, and fair value indicators, were assessed with respect to each of our ~~qualitative assessments, no~~reporting units to determine whether it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value of any of these reporting units was less than its estimated carrying value. As a result of our review, we concluded that the fair value of our reporting units had not more likely than not been reduced below their respective carrying values and that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic through the end of our second fiscal quarter of 2020 was not a triggering event to perform a quantitative test. We will continue to monitor the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including continued market declines, unfavorable economic conditions, declining financial performance, and other factors that could increase the risk of impairment of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset in future periods.

NOTE 10 – LEASES

We have operating leases for the premises we occupy in many of our U.S. and foreign locations, including our employee-based branch office operations. We also lease certain office and technology equipment. At inception, we determine if an arrangement to utilize a building or piece of equipment is a lease and, if so, the appropriate lease classification. If the arrangement is determined to be a lease, we recognize a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability on our balance sheet. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. We have elected the practical expedient, where leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded as an ROU asset or lease liability. Our lease terms include any noncancelable periods and may reflect periods covered by options to extend or terminate when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise those options. As of March 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term for our operating leases was ~~identified. No events~~five years.

We record our operating lease ROU assets at the amount of the lease liability plus any prepaid rent and initial direct costs, less any lease incentives and accrued rent. We record lease liabilities at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term, which is discounted using our commencement date incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate considers the weighted average yields on our senior notes payable, adjusted for collateralization and tenor. As of March 31, 2020, the weighted-

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

average discount rate for our operating leases was 3.86%. Payments that vary because of changes in facts or circumstances occurring after the commencement date are considered variable and are expensed in the period incurred. For our real estate leases, we elected the practical expedient to account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease. We have ~~occurred since~~not elected the practical expedient for our ~~assessments~~equipment leases and account for lease and non-lease components separately. As of March 31, 2020, ROU assets of $327 million and lease liabilities of $351 million were included as components of “Other assets” and “Other payables,” respectively, on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Lease expense

Lease expense for operating lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term if the ROU asset has not been impaired or abandoned.

The components of lease expense were as follows.



$ in million	Three months ended March 31, 2020		Six months ended March 31, 2020
Operating lease costs	$	23	$	46
Variable lease costs	$	4	$	12

Variable lease costs in the preceding table includes payments for common area maintenance charges and other variable costs that ~~would cause us~~are not reflected in the measurement of ROU assets and lease liabilities.

Finance leases and sublease income were immaterial for all periods presented. Short-term lease expenses for the three and six months ended March 31, 2020 were immaterial.

Lease liabilities

Maturities of lease liabilities as of March 31, 2020 were as follows.



Maturity of lease liabilities for fiscal year ended September 30,	$ in millions
Remainder of 2020	$	43
2021	95
2022	72
2023	58
2024	44
After 2024	79
Total lease payments	391
Less: interest	40
Present value of lease liabilities	$	351

Operating lease payments in the preceding table exclude $93 million of legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced. These leases are estimated to ~~update this impairment testing.~~commence between fiscal year 2020 and 2021 with lease terms ranging from two years to ten years.

Statement of cash flows supplemental information



$ in millions	Three months ended March 31, 2020		Six months ended March 31, 2020
Cash outflows - lease liabilities	$	24	$	47
Non-cash - ROU assets recorded for new and modified leases	$	27	$	39

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Minimum future lease commitments (under previous GAAP)

As of the date of adoption, our undiscounted minimum annual rental commitments under operating leases were materially unchanged from the disclosure in Note 17 of our 2019 Form 10-K, which is included in the following table.



Fiscal year ended September 30,	$ in millions
2020	$	103
2021	95
2022	79
2023	66
2024	49
Thereafter	127
Total	$	519

NOTE 11 – BANK DEPOSITS

Bank deposits include savings and money market accounts, certificates of deposit with RJ Bank, Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts and demand deposits. The following table presents a summary of bank deposits including the weighted-average rate, the calculation of which was based on the actual deposit balances at each respective period.


	June 30, 2019				September 30, 2018				March 31, 2020				September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Balance		Weighted-average rate		Balance		Weighted-average rate		Balance		Weighted-average rate		Balance		Weighted-average rate
Savings and money market accounts	$	21,605	0.54	%	$	19,475	0.54	%	$	28,715	0.01	%	$	21,654	0.25	%
Certificates of deposit	543		2.38	%	445		2.03	%	1,150		1.99	%	605		2.33	%
NOW accounts	6		0.01	%	6		0.01	%	136		1.92	%	6		0.01	%
Demand deposits (non-interest-bearing)	12		—		16		—		22		—		16		—
Total bank deposits	$	22,166	0.58	%	$	19,942	0.57	%
Total									$	30,023	0.09	%	$	22,281	0.31	%

Total bank deposits in the preceding table exclude affiliate deposits of ~~$148~~$179 million at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$279~~$163 million at September 30, ~~2018. These affiliate deposits included $147 million at June 30,~~ 2019, ~~and $277 million at September 30, 2018,~~all of which were held in a deposit account at RJ Bank on behalf of RJF.

Savings and money market accounts in the preceding table consist primarily of deposits that are cash balances swept from the client investment accounts maintained at Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJ&A”) to RJ Bank. These balances are held in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) ~~insured~~-insured bank accounts through the Raymond James Bank Deposit Program (“RJBDP”). The aggregate amount of individual time deposit account balances that exceeded the FDIC insurance limit at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 was approximately ~~$25~~$65 million.

The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit.


	June 30, 2019				September 30, 2018				March 31, 2020				September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Denominations greater than or equal to $100,000		Denominations less than $100,000		Denominations greater than or equal to $100,000		Denominations less than $100,000		Denominations greater than or equal to $100,000		Denominations less than $100,000		Denominations greater than or equal to $100,000		Denominations less than $100,000
Three months or less	$	39	$	26	$	30	$	17	$	84	$	20	$	24	$	19
Over three through six months	22		17		20		13		57		26		26		21
Over six through twelve months	47		32		38		26		67		85		75		37
Over one through two years	50		37		65		40		26		175		32		36
Over two through three years	30		73		21		14		54		160		40		93
Over three through four years	58		27		44		26		68		171		66		47
Over four through five years	56		29		63		28		7		150		38		51
Total	$	302	$	241	$	281	$	164
Total certificates of deposit									$	363	$	787	$	301	$	304

~~Interest expense on deposits, excluding interest expense related to affiliate deposits, is summarized in the following table.~~

Three months ended June 30, Nine months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2019 2018 2019 2018
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts $ 29
$ 18
$ 96
$ 35
Certificates of deposit 4
1
9
4
Total interest expense on deposits $ 33
$ 19
$ 105
$ 39

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Interest expense on deposits, excluding interest expense related to affiliate deposits, is summarized in the following table.



	Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2020		2019		2020		2019
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts	$	6	$	34	$	18	$	67
Certificates of deposit	6		3		10		5
Total interest expense on deposits	$	12	$	37	$	28	$	72

NOTE 12 – OTHER BORROWINGS

The following table details the components of other borrowings.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
FHLB advances	$	875	$	875	$	875	$	875
Secured lines of credit	50		—
Mortgage notes payable and other	20		24		16		19
Total other borrowings	$	945	$	899	$	891	$	894

FHLB advances

Borrowings from the FHLB as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, were comprised of both floating and fixed-rate advances. As of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the floating-rate advances totaled $850 million. The interest rates on the floating-rate advances, which ~~have interest rates that reset quarterly, totaled $850 million. The floating-rate advances~~ mature in December ~~2020.~~2022, reset quarterly and are generally based on LIBOR. We use interest rate swaps to manage the risk of increases in interest rates associated with these floating-rate advances by converting the balances subject to variable interest rates to a fixed interest rate. Refer to Note 62 of our 2019 Form 10-K for information regarding these interest rate swaps, which are accounted for as hedging instruments. As of both ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the fixed-rate advance totaled $25 million and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.4%. This advance matures in October 2020. All of the advances were secured by a blanket lien granted to the FHLB on our residential mortgage loan portfolio. The weighted average interest rate on these FHLB advances as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~2.39%~~1.42% and ~~2.41%~~2.17%, respectively.

Secured and unsecured financing arrangements

On February 19, 2019, RJF and RJ&A entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the “Credit Facility”) ~~which replaced the previous unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the “RJF Credit Facility”) entered into by RJF.~~. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of February 2024 and the lenders include a number of financial institutions. This committed unsecured borrowing facility provides for maximum borrowings of up to $500 million, with a sublimit of $300 million for ~~RJF, at~~RJF. RJ&A may borrow up to $500 million under the Credit Facility, depending on the amount of outstanding borrowings of RJF. The interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility are variable ~~rates of interest.~~and based on LIBOR, as adjusted for RJF’s credit rating. There were no0 borrowings outstanding on the Credit Facility as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. There is a facility fee associated with the Credit Facility, which also varies ~~depending upon~~with RJF’s credit rating. Based upon RJF’s credit rating as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the variable rate facility fee, which is applied to the committed amount, was 0.175% per annum.

In addition to the Credit Facility, we maintain various secured and unsecured lines of credit, which are generally utilized to finance certain fixed income securities or for cash management purposes. Borrowings during the period were generally day-to-day and there were no borrowings outstanding on these arrangements as of March 31, 2020. The interest rates for ~~all of our U.S. and Canadian secured and unsecured financing facilities~~these arrangements are variable and are based on the Fed Funds rate, ~~London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”),~~LIBOR, a lenders prime rate, or the Canadian prime rate, as applicable. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2019 was 3.25%. Borrowings on secured lines of credit were day-to-day and were generally utilized to finance certain fixed income securities. In addition, we

We also have other collateralized financings included in “Securities sold under agreements to repurchase” and “Securities loaned” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. See Note 76 for information regarding our other collateralized financing arrangements.

Mortgage notes payable and other

Mortgage notes payable pertain to mortgage loans on certain of our corporate headquarters offices located in St. Petersburg, Florida. These mortgage loans are secured by land, buildings, and improvements. These mortgage loans bear a fixed interest rate of 5.7% with repayment terms of monthly interest and principal debt service and have a January 2023 maturity.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 13 – SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE

The following table summarizes our senior notes payable.



$ in millions	March 31, 2020			September 30, 2019
5.625% senior notes, due 2024	$	250		$	250
3.625% senior notes, due 2026	500			500
4.65% senior notes, due 2030	500			—
4.95% senior notes, due 2046	800			800
Total principal amount	2,050			1,550
Unaccreted premium/(discount)	10			11
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(16		)	(11		)
Total senior notes payable	$	2,044		$	1,550

In March 2012, we sold in a registered underwritten public offering $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due April 2024. Interest on these senior notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of these senior notes at any time prior to their maturity, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon, discounted to the redemption date at a discount rate equal to a designated U.S. Treasury rate, plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

In July 2016, we sold in a registered underwritten public offering $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.625% senior notes due September 2026. Interest on these senior notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of these senior notes at any time prior to their maturity, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon, discounted to the redemption date at a discount rate equal to a designated U.S. Treasury rate, plus 35 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

In March 2020, we sold in a registered underwritten public offering $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.65% senior notes due April 2030. Interest on these senior notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of these senior notes at any time prior to January 1, 2030, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon, discounted to the redemption date at a discount rate equal to a designated U.S. Treasury rate, plus 50 basis points; and on or after January 1, 2030, at 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed; plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

In July 2016, we sold in a registered underwritten public offering $300 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.95% senior notes due July 2046. In May 2017, we reopened the offering and sold, in a registered underwritten public offering, an additional $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.95% senior notes due July 2046. These additional senior notes were consolidated, formed into a single series, and are fully fungible with the $300 million in aggregate principal amount 4.95% senior notes issued in July 2016. Interest on these senior notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of these senior notes at any time prior to their maturity, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon, discounted to the redemption date at a discount rate equal to a designated U.S. Treasury rate, plus 45 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES

The income tax provision for interim periods is comprised of tax on ordinary income provided at the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted for the tax effect of discrete items. We estimate the annual effective tax rate quarterly based on the forecasted pretax results of our U.S. and non-U.S. operations. Items unrelated to current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the period identified as a discrete item of tax. These discrete items generally relate to changes in tax laws, adjustments to the actual liability determined upon filing tax returns, excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation and adjustments to previously recorded reserves for uncertain tax positions. For discussion of income tax accounting policies and other income tax related information, see Notes 2 and 16 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

~~Effective tax rate~~

Our effective income tax rate was 25.1% for the nine months ended June 30, 2019, which was lower than the 34.8% effective tax rate for fiscal year 2018. The decrease in the current period effective income tax rate compared to fiscal year 2018’s effective income tax rate was due to the prior year remeasurement of our deferred tax assets at a lower enacted federal corporate tax rate, which negatively impacted the prior year’s effective income tax rate by 8.1%, as well as a decrease in the current year’s federal tax rate from 24.5% to 21.0%.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Effective tax rate

Our effective income tax rate was 26.9% for the six months ended March 31, 2020, which was higher than the 24.8% effective tax rate for fiscal year 2019. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the unfavorable impact in the current period of non-deductible valuation losses associated with our company-owned life insurance policies.

Uncertain tax positions

We anticipate that the uncertain tax position liability balance will not change significantly over the next twelve months.

NOTE 1415 – COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES

Commitments and contingencies

Loan and underwriting commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into commitments for fixed income and equity underwritings. As of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, we had ~~three~~4 such open underwriting commitments, which were subsequently settled in open market transactions and none of which resulted in a significant loss.

~~As part of our recruiting efforts, we~~We offer loans to prospective financial advisors and certain key revenue producers primarily for recruiting, transitional cost assistance, and retention purposes (see Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our accounting policies governing these transactions). These ~~commitments~~offers are contingent upon certain events occurring, including ~~but not limited~~the individuals joining us and meeting certain conditions outlined in their offer. Our unfunded loan commitments related to ~~the individual joining us. As~~such offers were insignificant as of June 30, 2019, we had made commitments through the extension of formal offers totaling approximately $214 million; however, it is possible that not all of our offers will be accepted and therefore, we would not fund the total amount of the offers extended. As of June 30, 2019, $128 million of the total amount extended consisted of unfunded commitments to prospective financial advisors that had accepted our offers, or recently hired producers.March 31, 2020.

Commitments to extend credit and other credit-related financial instruments

RJ Bank has outstanding, at any time, a significant number of commitments to extend credit and other credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments such as standby letters of credit and loan purchases, which then extend over varying periods of time. These arrangements are subject to strict underwriting assessments and each customer’s credit worthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and our exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments.

The following table presents RJ Bank’s commitments to extend credit and other credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments outstanding.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Open-end consumer lines of credit (primarily SBL)	$	8,766	$	7,332	$	10,758	$	9,328
Commercial lines of credit	$	1,567	$	1,643	$	1,153	$	1,527
Unfunded loan commitments	$	628	$	541	$	676	$	599
Standby letters of credit	$	40	$	41	$	40	$	40

Open-end consumer lines of credit primarily represent the unfunded amounts of RJ Bank loans to consumers that are secured by marketable securities at advance rates consistent with industry standards. The proceeds from repayment or, if necessary, the liquidation of collateral, which is monitored daily, are expected to satisfy the amounts drawn against these existing lines of credit. These lines of credit are primarily uncommitted, as we reserve the right to not make any advances or may terminate these lines at any time.

Because many of our lending commitments expire without being funded in whole or part, the contractual amounts are not estimates of our actual future credit exposure or future liquidity requirements. We maintain a reserve to provide for potential losses related to the unfunded lending commitments. See Note 87 for further discussion of this reserve for unfunded lending commitments.

RJ&A enters into margin lending arrangements which allow customers to borrow against the value of qualifying securities. Margin loans are collateralized by the securities held in the customer’s account at RJ&A. Collateral levels and established credit terms are monitored daily and we require customers to deposit additional collateral or reduce balances as necessary.

~~Investment commitments~~

RJ Bank has committed approximately $81 million as an investor member in a LIHTC fund which has invested in various project partnerships and in which a subsidiary of RJTCF is the managing member (see Note 2 of our 2018 Form 10-K for information regarding the accounting policies governing these investments). As of ~~June 30, 2019, RJ Bank had invested $80 million of the committed amount.~~

~~We had unfunded commitments to various private equity investments of $15 million as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Investment commitments

We had unfunded commitments to various investments, including private equity investments and certain RJ Bank investments, of $41 million as of March 31, 2020.

Other commitments

RJF has committed an amount of up to $225 million, subject to certain limitations, to either lend to, or guarantee obligations of RJTCF in connection with RJTCF’s low-income housing development/rehabilitation and syndication activities. At ~~June 30, 2019, RJTCF had $96 million outstanding against this commitment. RJTCF may borrow from RJF in order to make~~Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. (“RJTCF”) sells investments in ~~or fund loans or advances to, either~~ project partnerships ~~that purchase and develop properties qualifying for tax credits or LIHTC funds. Investments in project partnerships are sold~~ to various LIHTC funds, which have third-party investors, and for which RJTCF serves as the managing member or general partner. RJTCF typically sells investments in project partnerships to LIHTC funds within 90 days of their ~~acquisition,~~acquisition. Until such investments are sold to LIHTC funds, RJTCF is responsible for funding investment commitments to such partnerships. As of March 31, 2020, RJTCF had committed approximately $204 million to project partnerships that had not yet been sold to LIHTC funds. Because we expect to sell these project partnerships to LIHTC funds and the ~~proceeds from~~equity funding events arise over future periods, the ~~sales~~contractual commitments are ~~used~~not expected to ~~repay RJTCF’s borrowings from RJF.~~impact our future liquidity requirements. RJTCF may also make short-term loans or advances to project partnerships and LIHTC funds.

As a part of our fixed income public finance operations, we enter into forward commitments to purchase agency MBS (see the discussion of these activities within Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K). At ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, we had ~~$301~~$331 million principal amount of outstanding forward MBS purchase commitments, which were expected to be purchased within 90 days following commitment. In order to hedge the market interest rate risk to which we would otherwise be exposed between the date of the commitment and the date of sale of the MBS, we enter into TBA security contracts with investors for generic MBS at specific rates and prices to be delivered on settlement dates in the future. We may be subject to loss if the timing of, or the actual amount of, the MBS differs significantly from the term and notional amount of the TBA security contract to which we entered. These TBA securities and related purchase commitments are accounted for at fair value. As of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, the fair value of the TBA securities and the estimated fair value of the purchase commitments were insignificant.

Guarantees

Our U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are required by federal law to be members of the Securities Investors Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). The SIPC fund provides protection up to $500 thousand per client for securities and cash held in client accounts, including a limitation of $250 thousand on claims for cash balances. We have purchased excess SIPC coverage through various syndicates of Lloyd’s of London. For RJ&A, our clearing broker-dealer, the additional protection currently provided has an aggregate firm limit of $750 million for cash and securities, including a sub-limit of $1.9 million per client for cash above basic SIPC. Account protection applies when a SIPC member fails financially and is unable to meet obligations to clients. This coverage does not protect against market fluctuations. RJF has provided an indemnity to Lloyd’s of London against any and all losses they may incur associated with the excess SIPC policies.

RJTCF has provided a guaranteed return on investment to a third-party investor in the Guaranteed LIHTC Fund and RJF has guaranteed RJTCF’s performance under the arrangement. Under the terms of the performance guarantee, should the underlying LIHTC project partnerships held by the Guaranteed LIHTC Fund fail to deliver a certain amount of tax credits and other tax benefits to this investor over the next three years, RJTCF is obligated to pay the investor an amount that results in the investor achieving a minimum specified return on their investment. A $5 million financing asset was included in “Other assets,” and a related $5 million liability was included in “Other payables” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~related to this obligation. The maximum exposure to loss under this guarantee was $5 million at~~ ~~June 30, 2019, which represented the undiscounted future payments due the investor.~~

We guarantee the debt of one of our private equity investments. The amount of such debt, including the undrawn portion of a revolving credit facility, was ~~$14~~$13 million as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The debt, which matures in 2021, is secured by substantially all of the assets of the borrower.

Legal and regulatory matter contingencies

In addition to any matters that may be specifically described in the following sections, in the normal course of our business, we have been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation, arising in connection with our activities as a diversified financial services institution.

RJF and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to regular reviews and inspections by regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations. Reviews can result in the imposition of sanctions for regulatory violations, ranging from non-monetary censures to fines and, in serious cases, temporary or permanent suspension from conducting business, or limitations on certain business activities. In addition, regulatory agencies and self-regulatory organizations institute investigations from time to time into industry practices, which can also result in the imposition of such sanctions.

We may contest liability and/or the amount of damages, as appropriate, in each pending matter. Over the last several years, the level of litigation and investigatory activity (both formal and informal) by government and self-regulatory agencies has increased significantly in the financial services industry. There can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that have not yet been asserted or are not yet determined to be material.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

WeFor many legal and regulatory matters, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss as we cannot predict if, how or when such proceedings or investigations will be resolved or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, may be. A large number of factors may contribute to this inherent unpredictability: the proceeding is in its early stages; the damages sought are unspecified, unsupported or uncertain; it is unclear whether a case brought as a class action will be allowed to proceed on that basis; the other party is seeking relief other than or in addition to compensatory damages (including, in the case of regulatory and governmental proceedings, potential fines and penalties); the matters present significant legal uncertainties; we have not engaged in settlement discussions; discovery is not complete; there are significant facts in dispute; and numerous parties are named as defendants (including where it is uncertain how liability might be shared among defendants). Subject to the foregoing, after consultation with counsel, we believe that the outcome of such litigation and regulatory proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. However, the outcome of such litigation and proceedings could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our revenues or income for such period.

~~We contest liability and/or~~There are certain matters for which we are unable to estimate the ~~amount~~upper end of ~~damages,~~the range of reasonably possible loss. With respect to legal and regulatory matters for which management has been able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss as ~~appropriate, in each pending matter. Over~~of March 31, 2020, we estimated the ~~last several years,~~upper end of the ~~level~~range of litigation and investigatory activity (both formal and informal) by government and self-regulatory agencies has increased significantly in the financial services industry. There can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that have not yet been asserted or are not yet determinedreasonably possible aggregate loss to be ~~material.~~approximately $80 million in excess of the aggregate accruals for such matters. Refer to Note 2 of our 2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our criteria for recognizing liabilities for contingencies.

We may from time to time include in any descriptions of individual matters herein certain quantitative information about the plaintiff’s claim against us as alleged in the plaintiff’s pleadings or other public filings. Although this information may provide insight into the potential magnitude of a matter, it does not represent our estimate of reasonably possible loss or our judgment as to any currently appropriate accrual related thereto.

Subject to the foregoing, we believe, after consultation with counsel and consideration of the accrued liability amounts included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, that the outcome of such litigation and regulatory proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. However, the outcome of such litigation and proceedings could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our revenues or income for such period.

With respect to legal and regulatory matters for which management has been able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss as of June 30, 2019, we estimated the upper end of the range of reasonably possible aggregate loss to be approximately $85 million in excess of the aggregate reserves for such matters. Refer to Note 2 of our 2018 Form 10-K for a discussion of our criteria for recognizing liabilities for contingencies.

~~Legal matters~~

On February 17, 2015, Jyll Brink (“Brink”) filed a putative class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “District Court”) under the caption Jyll Brink v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (the “Brink Complaint”). The Brink Complaint alleges that Brink, a former customer of RJ&A, was charged a fee in her Passport Investment Account, and that the fee included an unauthorized and undisclosed profit to RJ&A in violation of its customer agreement and applicable industry standards. The Passport Investment Account is a fee-based account in which clients pay asset-based advisory fees and certain processing fees for ongoing investment advice and monitoring of securities holdings. The Brink Complaint seeks, among other relief, damages in the amount of the difference between the actual cost of processing a trade, as alleged by Brink, and the fee charged by RJ&A. On October 19, 2018, the District Court certified a class of former and current customers of RJ&A who executed a Passport Agreement and were charged processing fees during the period between February 17, 2010 and February 17, 2015.

On February 11, 2016, Caleb Wistar (“Wistar”) and Ernest Mayeaux (“Mayeaux”) filed a putative class action complaint in the District Court under the caption Caleb Wistar and Ernest Mayeaux v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc. (as subsequently amended, the “Wistar Complaint”). Similar to the Brink Complaint, the Wistar Complaint alleges that Wistar and Mayeaux, former customers of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (“RJFS”) and Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc. (“RJFSA”), were charged a fee in RJFS and RJFSA’s Passport Investment Account and that the fee included an unauthorized and undisclosed profit to RJFS and RJFSA in violation of its customer agreement and applicable industry standards. The Wistar Complaint seeks, among other relief, damages in the amount of the difference between the actual cost of processing a trade, as alleged by Wistar and Mayeaux, and the fee charge by RJFS and RJFSA.

On April 5, 2019, the parties to the Brink Complaint and the Wistar Complaint agreed in principle to an aggregate settlement of $15 million. On June 11, 2019, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement and Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Certification of the Settled Subclasses. On June 12, 2019, the District Court entered an order preliminarily approving the Class Action Settlement and set a hearing date of October 25, 2019 for final approval of the settlement. While the hearing for final approval has been set, the settlement remains subject to approval by the District Court. The settlement amounts for both complaints were included in “Other payables” in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2019.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~NOTE 15 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)~~

~~All of the components of OCI, net of tax, were attributable to RJF. The following table presents the net change in OCI as well as the changes, and the related tax effects, of each component of AOCI.~~

$ in millions Net investment hedges Currency translations Subtotal: net investment hedges and currency translations Available- for-sale securities Cash flow hedges Total
Three months ended June 30, 2019
AOCI as of beginning of period $ 114
$ (142 ) $ (28 ) $ (9 ) $ 12
$ (25 )
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes (16 ) 18
2
32
(24 ) 10
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax —
—
—
—
(1 ) (1 )
Pre-tax net OCI (16 ) 18
2
32
(25 ) 9
Income tax effect 4
—
4
(8 ) 6
2
OCI for the period, net of tax (12 ) 18
6
24
(19 ) 11
AOCI as of end of period $ 102
$ (124 ) $ (22 ) $ 15
$ (7 ) $ (14 )

Nine months ended June 30, 2019
AOCI as of beginning of period $ 88
$ (111 ) $ (23 ) $ (46 ) $ 42
$ (27 )
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-01 —
—
—
(4 ) —
(4 )
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes 18
(13 ) 5
90
(64 ) 31
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax —
—
—
—
(4 ) (4 )
Pre-tax net OCI 18
(13 ) 5
90
(68 ) 27
Income tax effect (4 ) —
(4 ) (25 ) 19
(10 )
OCI for the period, net of tax 14
(13 ) 1
65
(49 ) 17
AOCI as of end of period $ 102
$ (124 ) $ (22 ) $ 15
$ (7 ) $ (14 )

Three months ended June 30, 2018
AOCI as of beginning of period $ 85
$ (107 ) $ (22 ) $ (31 ) $ 30
$ (23 )
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes 18
(19 ) (1 ) (5 ) 10
4
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax —
—
—
—
(1 ) (1 )
Pre-tax net OCI 18
(19 ) (1 ) (5 ) 9
3
Income tax effect (5 ) —
(5 ) 1
(3 ) (7 )
OCI for the period, net of tax 13
(19 ) (6 ) (4 ) 6
(4 )
AOCI as of end of period $ 98
$ (126 ) $ (28 ) $ (35 ) $ 36
$ (27 )

Nine months ended June 30, 2018
AOCI as of beginning of period $ 60
$ (80 ) $ (20 ) $ (2 ) $ 7
$ (15 )
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2018-02 —
—
—
(2 ) 2
—
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes 52
(46 ) 6
(45 ) 39
—
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax —
—
—
—
1
1
Pre-tax net OCI 52
(46 ) 6
(45 ) 40
1
Income tax effect (14 ) —
(14 ) 14
(13 ) (13 )
OCI for the period, net of tax 38
(46 ) (8 ) (31 ) 27
(12 )
AOCI as of end of period $ 98
$ (126 ) $ (28 ) $ (35 ) $ 36
$ (27 )

As of October 1, 2018, we adopted new accounting guidance related to the classification and measurement of financial instruments (ASU 2016-01), which generally requires changes in the fair value of equity securities to be recorded in net income. As a result, on a prospective basis beginning October 1, 2018, unrealized gains/(losses) on our equity securities previously classified and accounted for as available-for-sale are recorded in net income instead of OCI. Accordingly, we reclassified a cumulative unrealized gain on such securities, net of tax, from AOCI to retained earnings. See Notes 2 and 5 for additional information.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Reclassifications from AOCI to net income, excluding taxes, for each of the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were recorded in “Interest expense” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

~~Our net investment hedges and cash flow hedges relate to our derivatives associated with RJ Bank’s business operations (see Note 6 for additional information on these derivatives).~~

~~Our policy is to release tax effects remaining in AOCI on an individual security basis.~~

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 16 – ~~REVENUES~~ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

OnAll of the components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of tax, were attributable to RJF. The following table presents the net change in AOCI as well as the changes, and the related tax effects, of each component of AOCI.



$ in millions	Net investment hedges			Currency translations			Subtotal: net investment hedges and currency translations			Available- for-sale securities			Cash flow hedges			Total
Three months ended March 31, 2020
AOCI as of beginning of period	$	97		$	(113	)	$	(16	)	$	20		$	(9	)	$	(5	)
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes	69			(78		)	(9		)	85			(58		)	18
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax	—			—			—			—			—			—
Pre-tax net OCI	69			(78		)	(9		)	85			(58		)	18
Income tax effect	(17		)	—			(17		)	(22		)	15			(24		)
OCI for the period, net of tax	52			(78		)	(26		)	63			(43		)	(6		)
AOCI as of end of period	$	149		$	(191	)	$	(42	)	$	83		$	(52	)	$	(11	)

Six months ended March 31, 2020
AOCI as of beginning of period	$	110		$	(135	)	$	(25	)	$	21		$	(19	)	$	(23	)
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes	52			(56		)	(4		)	83			(44		)	35
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax	—			—			—			—			—			—
Pre-tax net OCI	52			(56		)	(4		)	83			(44		)	35
Income tax effect	(13		)	—			(13		)	(21		)	11			(23		)
OCI for the period, net of tax	39			(56		)	(17		)	62			(33		)	12
AOCI as of end of period	$	149		$	(191	)	$	(42	)	$	83		$	(52	)	$	(11	)

Three months ended March 31, 2019
AOCI as of beginning of period	$	125		$	(161	)	$	(36	)	$	(28	)	$	25		$	(39	)
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes	(15		)	19			4			26			(16		)	14
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax	—			—			—			—			(2		)	(2		)
Pre-tax net OCI	(15		)	19			4			26			(18		)	12
Income tax effect	4			—			4			(7		)	5			2
OCI for the period, net of tax	(11		)	19			8			19			(13		)	14
AOCI as of end of period	$	114		$	(142	)	$	(28	)	$	(9	)	$	12		$	(25	)

Six months ended March 31, 2019
AOCI as of beginning of period	$	88		$	(111	)	$	(23	)	$	(46	)	$	42		$	(27	)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2018-02	—			—			—			(4		)	—			(4		)
OCI:
OCI before reclassifications and taxes	34			(31		)	3			58			(40		)	21
Amounts reclassified from AOCI, before tax	—			—			—			—			(3		)	(3		)
Pre-tax net OCI	34			(31		)	3			58			(43		)	18
Income tax effect	(8		)	—			(8		)	(17		)	13			(12		)
OCI for the period, net of tax	26			(31		)	(5		)	41			(30		)	6
AOCI as of end of period	$	114		$	(142	)	$	(28	)	$	(9	)	$	12		$	(25	)

As of October 1, 2018, we adopted ~~new~~ accounting guidance ~~for revenue from contracts with customers. Under~~(ASU 2016-01) that generally requires changes in the new guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are delivered to our customers in an amount we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services (i.e., the transaction price). Contracts with customers can include multiple services, which are accounted for as separate “performance obligations” if they are determinedfair value of equity securities to be ~~distinct. Our performance obligations to our customers are generally satisfied when we transfer the promised good or service to our customer, either at a point~~recorded in time or over time. Revenue from a performance obligation transferred at a point in time is recognized at the time that the customer obtains control over the promised good or service. Revenue from our performance obligations satisfied over time are recognized in a manner that depicts our performance in transferring controlnet income. Accordingly, as of the ~~good or service, which is generally measured based~~date of adoption, we reclassified a cumulative unrealized gain on ~~time elapsed, as our customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefit~~such securities, net of ~~our services as they are provided.~~tax, from AOCI to retained earnings.

~~Payment~~Reclassifications from AOCI to net income, excluding taxes, for the majority of our services is considered to be variable consideration, as the amount of revenues we expect to receive is subject to factors outside of our control, including market conditions. Variable consideration is only includedthree and six months ended March 31, 2019 were recorded in ~~revenue when amounts are not subject to significant reversal, which is generally when uncertainty around the amount of revenue to be received is resolved.~~

We involve third parties in providing services to the customer for some of our contracts with customers. Under the new guidance, we are generally deemed to control the promised services before they are transferred to the customer. Accordingly, beginning with adoption of the new guidance, we present the related revenues gross of the related costs.

~~The following tables present our sources of revenues by segment. See Note 21 for additional information on our segment results.~~

Three months ended June 30, 2019
$ in millions Private Client Group Capital Markets Asset Management RJ Bank Other and intersegment eliminations Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees $ 718
$ 2
$ 165
$ —
$ (6 ) $ 879
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products 147
1
2
—
—
150
Insurance and annuity products 105
—
—
—
—
105
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products 74
29
—
—
—
103
Subtotal securities commissions 326

30

2

—

—

358
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾
20
74
—
—
(1 ) 93
Total brokerage revenues 346

104

2

—

(1 )
451
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees 85
—
—
—
(1 ) 84
RJBDP fees 111
—
1
—
(46 ) 66
Client account and other fees 32
1
7
—
(7 ) 33
Total account and service fees 228

1

8

—

(54 )
183
Investment banking:
Equity underwriting 10
27
—
—
—
37
Merger & acquisition and advisory —
78
—
—
—
78
Fixed income investment banking —
24
—
—
—
24
Total investment banking 10

129

—

—

—

139
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues —
16
—
—
—
16
All other ⁽¹⁾
3
(1 ) 1
7
1
11
Total other 3

15

1

7

1

27
Total non-interest revenues 1,305

251

176

7

(60 )
1,679
Interest income ⁽¹⁾
56
10
1
246
8
321
Total revenues 1,361
261
177
253
(52 ) 2,000
Interest expense (10 ) (10 ) —
(38 ) (15 ) (73 )
Net revenues $ 1,351
$ 251
$ 177
$ 215
$ (67 ) $ 1,927

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Three months ended June 30, 2018
$ in millions Private Client Group Capital Markets Asset Management RJ Bank Other and intersegment eliminations Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees $ 636
$ 1
$ 157
$ —
$ (4 ) $ 790
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products 172
2
3
—
(3 ) 174
Insurance and annuity products 97
—
—
—
—
97
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products 84
40
—
—
—
124
Subtotal securities commissions 353
42
3
—
(3 ) 395
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾
22
52
—
—
(1 ) 73
Total brokerage revenues 375

94

3

—

(4 )
468
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees 85
—
—
—
(2 ) 83
RJBDP fees 94
—
1
—
(24 ) 71
Client account and other fees 30
2
8
—
(7 ) 33
Total account and service fees 209

2

9

—

(33 )
187
Investment banking:
Equity underwriting 9
30
—
—
—
39
Merger & acquisition and advisory —
85
—
—
—
85
Fixed income investment banking —
21
—
—
—
21
Total investment banking 9

136

—

—

—

145
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues —
12
—
—
—
12
All other ⁽¹⁾
8
(2 ) (1 ) 8
5
18
Total other 8

10

(1 )
8

5

30
Total non-interest revenues 1,237

243

168

8

(36 )
1,620
Interest income ⁽¹⁾
50
9
—
205
7
271
Total revenues 1,287

252

168

213

(29 )
1,891
Interest expense (8 ) (9 ) —
(25 ) (12 ) (54 )
Net revenues $ 1,279

$ 243

$ 168

$ 188

$ (41 )
$ 1,837

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
$ in millions Private Client Group Capital Markets Asset Management RJ Bank Other and intersegment eliminations Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees $ 2,063
$ 5
$ 475
$ —
$ (16 ) $ 2,527
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products 449
4
7
—
(2 ) 458
Insurance and annuity products 308
—
—
—
—
308
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products 232
99
—
—
(2 ) 329
Subtotal securities commissions 989

103

7

—

(4 )
1,095
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾
59
203
—
1
(1 ) 262
Total brokerage revenues 1,048

306

7

1

(5 )
1,357
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees 250
—
2
—
(9 ) 243
RJBDP fees 342
—
3
—
(131 ) 214
Client account and other fees 92
3
22
—
(15 ) 102
Total account and service fees 684

3

27

—

(155 )
559
Investment banking:
Equity underwriting 25
72
—
—
—
97
Merger & acquisition and advisory —
279
—
—
—
279
Fixed income investment banking —
63
—
—
—
63
Total investment banking 25

414

—

—

—

439
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues —
49
—
—
—
49
All other ⁽¹⁾
19
1
1
19
6
46
Total other 19

50

1

19

6

95
Total non-interest revenues 3,839

778

510

20

(170 )
4,977
Interest income ⁽¹⁾
170
29
3
732
27
961
Total revenues 4,009

807

513

752

(143 )
5,938
Interest expense (31 ) (26 ) —
(122 ) (42 ) (221 )
Net revenues $ 3,978

$ 781

$ 513

$ 630

$ (185 )
$ 5,717

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
$ in millions Private Client Group Capital Markets Asset Management RJ Bank Other and intersegment eliminations Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees $ 1,843
$ 6
$ 450
$ —
$ (12 ) $ 2,287
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products 535
6
9
—
(4 ) 546
Insurance and annuity products 308
—
—
—
—
308
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products 270
114
—
—
(2 ) 382
Subtotal securities commissions 1,113
120
9
—
(6 ) 1,236
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾
62
193
—
1
(1 ) 255
Total brokerage revenues 1,175
313
9
1
(7 ) 1,491
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees 246
—
1
—
(6 ) 241
RJBDP fees 265
—
3
—
(67 ) 201
Client account and other fees 85
4
18
—
(14 ) 93
Total account and service fees 596
4
22
—
(87 ) 535
Investment banking:
Equity underwriting 25
66
—
—
—
91
Merger & acquisition and advisory —
200
—
—
—
200
Fixed income investment banking —
58
—
—
—
58
Total investment banking 25
324
—
—
—
349
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues —
40
—
—
—
40
All other ⁽¹⁾
24
—
—
16
20
60
Total other 24
40
—
16
20
100
Total non-interest revenues 3,663
687
481
17
(86 ) 4,762
Interest income ⁽¹⁾
140
24
1
571
16
752
Total revenues 3,803
711
482
588
(70 ) 5,514
Interest expense (19 ) (21 ) —
(56 ) (43 ) (139 )
Net revenues $ 3,784
$ 690
$ 482
$ 532
$ (113 ) $ 5,375

~~(1) These revenues are generally not in scope of the new accounting guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.~~

~~Asset management and related administrative fees~~

We earn asset management and related administrative fees for performing asset management, investment advisory and related administrative services for retail and institutional clients. Such fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of assets in fee-based accounts under administration in our Private Client Group (“PCG”) segment or the net asset value of institutional accounts, retail accounts we manage on behalf of third-party institutions or funds that we manage in our Asset Management segment. The value of these assets is impacted by market fluctuations and net inflows or outflows of assets. Fees are generally collected quarterly and are based on balances either at the beginning of the quarter, the end of the quarter, or average balances throughout the quarter. Asset management and related administrative fees are recognized on a monthly basis (i.e., over time) as the services are performed.

Revenues related to fee-based accounts under administration in PCG are shared by the PCG and Asset Management segments, the amount of which depends on whether clients are invested in assets that are overseen by our Asset Management segment (i.e., included in financial assets under management (“AUM”) in the Asset Management segment) and the administrative services being provided. Asset management revenues earned for retail accounts managed on behalf of third-party institutions, institutional accounts or funds that we manage are recorded entirely in the Asset Management segment.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~Brokerage revenues~~

~~Securities commissions~~

~~Mutual and other fund products and insurance and annuity products~~

~~We earn revenues for distribution and related support services performed related to mutual and other funds, fixed and variable annuities and insurance products. Depending~~“Interest expense” on the product sold, we may receive an upfront fee for our services, a trailing commission, or some combination thereof. Upfront commissions received are generally based on a fixed rate applied, as a percentage, to amounts invested or the value of the contract at the time of sale and are recognized at the time of sale (or, in the case of insurance and annuity products, when the policy is accepted by the carrier). Trailing commissions are generally based on a fixed rate applied, as a percentage, to the net asset value of the fund, or the value of the insurance policy or annuity contract. Trailing commissions are generally received monthly or quarterly while our client holds the investment or holds the contract. As these trailing commissions are based on factors outside of our control, including market movements and client behavior (i.e., how long clients hold their investment, insurance policy or annuity contract), such revenue is recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur.

~~Equities, exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) and fixed income products~~

We earn commissions for executing and clearing transactions for customers, primarily in listed and OTC equity securities, including ETFs, and options. Such revenues primarily arise from transactions for retail clients in our PCG segment, as well as services related to sales and trading activities transacted on an agency basis in our Capital Markets segment. Commissions are recognized on trade date, generally received from the customer on settlement date, and we record a receivable between the trade date and the date collected from the customer.

~~Principal transaction revenues~~

Principal transactions include revenues from customers’ purchases and sales of financial instruments, including fixed income and equity securities and derivatives, in which we transact on a principal basis. To facilitate such transactions, we carry inventories of financial instruments. The gains and losses on such inventories, both realized and unrealized, are reported as principal transactions revenues.

~~Account and service fees~~

~~Mutual fund and annuity service fees~~

We earn servicing fees for providing sales and marketing support to product partners and for supporting the availability and distribution of their products on our platforms. We also earn servicing fees from such partners for accounting and administrative services. These fees, which are received monthly or quarterly, are generally based on the market value of assets or number of positions in such programs or, in certain cases, are a fixed annual fee, and are recognized over time as the services are performed.

~~RJBDP fees~~

We earn servicing fees from various banks for administrative services we provide related to our clients’ deposits that are swept to such banks as part of RJBDP, our multi-bank sweep program. The amounts received from third-party banks are variable in nature and fluctuate based on client cash balances in the program, as well as the level of short-term interest rates relative to interest paid to clients on balances in the RJBDP. The fees are earned over time as the related administrative services are performed and are received monthly. Our PCG segment also earns servicing fees from RJ Bank, which are based on the number of accounts that are swept to RJ Bank. These fees are eliminated in consolidation.

~~Investment banking revenues~~

We earn revenue from investment banking transactions, including public and private equity and debt financing, merger & acquisition advisory services, and other advisory services. Underwriting revenues, which are typically deducted from the proceeds remitted to the issuer, are recognized on trade date if there is no uncertainty or contingency related to the amount to be paid. Fees from merger & acquisition and advisory assignments are generally recognized at the time the services related to the transaction are completed under the terms of the engagement. Fees for advisory services are typically received upfront, as non-refundable retainer fees, or as a success fee upon completion of a transaction. Expenses related to investment banking transactions are generally deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the assignment is otherwise concluded. Beginning October 1, 2018, such expenses have been included in “Professional fees” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Impact~~Our net investment hedges and cash flow hedges relate to our derivatives associated with RJ Bank’s business operations. See Note 2 of ~~adoption~~our 2019 Form 10-K and Note 5 for additional information on these derivatives.

~~As a result~~

NOTE 17 – REVENUES

The following tables present our sources of ~~the adoption of the new~~revenues by segment. For further information about our significant accounting ~~guidance, we have changed the presentation of certain costs from a net presentation within revenues to a gross presentation, particularly those~~policies related to ~~merger & acquisition, advisory and underwriting transactions and certain administrative costs related to the RJBDP. As a result~~revenue recognition, see Note 2 of our 2019 Form 10-K. See Note 22 of this ~~change, “Investment banking” and “Professional fees” were each $6 million higher~~Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $16 million higher for the nine months ended June 30, 2019, and “Account and service fees” and “Other” expense were each $1 million higher for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $5 million higher for the nine months ended June 30, 2019. These changes had no impactadditional information on ~~pre-tax or net income.~~our segment results.



	Three months ended March 31, 2020
$ in millions	Private Client Group			Capital Markets			Asset Management		RJ Bank			Other and intersegment eliminations			Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	833		$	1		$	177	$	—		$	(5	)	$	1,006
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products	163			1			2		—			—			166
Insurance and annuity products	99			—			—		—			—			99
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products	105			40			—		—			—			145
Subtotal securities commissions	367			41			2		—			—			410
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾	17			89			—		—			(1		)	105
Total brokerage revenues	384			130			2		—			(1		)	515
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees	88			—			—		—			—			88
RJBDP fees	99			—			—		—			(48		)	51
Client account and other fees	35			2			4		—			(8		)	33
Total account and service fees	222			2			4		—			(56		)	172
Investment banking:
Merger & acquisition and advisory	—			72			—		—			—			72
Equity underwriting	11			43			—		—			—			54
Debt underwriting	—			22			—		—			—			22
Total investment banking	11			137			—		—			—			148
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues	—			12			—		—			—			12
All other ⁽¹⁾	7			4			1		5			(44		)	(27		)
Total other	7			16			1		5			(44		)	(15		)
Total non-interest revenues	1,457			286			184		5			(106		)	1,826
Interest income ⁽¹⁾	45			10			—		223			7			285
Total revenues	1,502			296			184		228			(99		)	2,111
Interest expense	(7		)	(6		)	—		(18		)	(12		)	(43		)
Net revenues	$	1,495		$	290		$	184	$	210		$	(111	)	$	2,068


(1)	These revenues are generally not in scope of the accounting guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.

~~Other items~~

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



	Three months ended March 31, 2019
$ in millions	Private Client Group			Capital Markets			Asset Management		RJ Bank			Other and intersegment eliminations			Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	638		$	1		$	149	$	—		$	(5	)	$	783
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products	145			1			2		—			—			148
Insurance and annuity products	99			—			—		—			—			99
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products	74			30			—		—			(2		)	102
Subtotal securities commissions	318			31			2		—			(2		)	349
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾	20			72			—		—			1			93
Total brokerage revenues	338			103			2		—			(1		)	442
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees	82			—			1		—			(5		)	78
RJBDP fees	122			—			1		—			(44		)	79
Client account and other fees	27			2			8		—			(3		)	34
Total account and service fees	231			2			10		—			(52		)	191
Investment banking:
Merger & acquisition and advisory	—			121			—		—			—			121
Equity underwriting	8			18			—		—			(1		)	25
Debt underwriting	—			17			—		—			—			17
Total investment banking	8			156			—		—			(1		)	163
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues	—			14			—		—			—			14
All other ⁽¹⁾	9			—			—		7			1			17
Total other	9			14			—		7			1			31
Total non-interest revenues	1,224			276			161		7			(58		)	1,610
Interest income ⁽¹⁾	58			9			1		247			9			324
Total revenues	1,282			285			162		254			(49		)	1,934
Interest expense	(11		)	(8		)	—		(42		)	(14		)	(75		)
Net revenues	$	1,271		$	277		$	162	$	212		$	(63	)	$	1,859


(1)	These revenues are generally not in scope of the accounting guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



	Six months ended March 31, 2020
$ in millions	Private Client Group			Capital Markets			Asset Management		RJ Bank			Other and intersegment eliminations			Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	1,615		$	3		$	353	$	—		$	(10	)	$	1,961
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products	307			4			4		—			(1		)	314
Insurance and annuity products	200			—			—		—			—			200
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products	190			70			—		—			(1		)	259
Subtotal securities commissions	697			74			4		—			(2		)	773
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾	34			171			—		—			(3		)	202
Total brokerage revenues	731			245			4		—			(5		)	975
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees	178			—			1		—			(1		)	178
RJBDP fees	204			—			—		—			(95		)	109
Client account and other fees	64			3			8		—			(12		)	63
Total account and service fees	446			3			9		—			(108		)	350
Investment banking:
Merger & acquisition and advisory	—			132			—		—			—			132
Equity underwriting	22			82			—		—			—			104
Debt underwriting	—			53			—		—			—			53
Total investment banking	22			267			—		—			—			289
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues	—			30			—		—			—			30
All other ⁽¹⁾	16			4			1		11			(48		)	(16		)
Total other	16			34			1		11			(48		)	14
Total non-interest revenues	2,830			552			367		11			(171		)	3,589
Interest income ⁽¹⁾	94			18			1		454			15			582
Total revenues	2,924			570			368		465			(156		)	4,171
Interest expense	(15		)	(12		)	—		(39		)	(28		)	(94		)
Net revenues	$	2,909		$	558		$	368	$	426		$	(184	)	$	4,077


(1)	These revenues are generally not in scope of the accounting guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



	Six months ended March 31, 2019
$ in millions	Private Client Group			Capital Markets			Asset Management		RJ Bank			Other and intersegment eliminations			Total
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	1,345		$	3		$	310	$	—		$	(10	)	$	1,648
Brokerage revenues:
Securities commissions:
Mutual and other fund products	302			3			5		—			(2		)	308
Insurance and annuity products	203			—			—		—			—			203
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products	158			70			—		—			(2		)	226
Subtotal securities commissions	663			73			5		—			(4		)	737
Principal transactions ⁽¹⁾	39			129			—		1			—			169
Total brokerage revenues	702			202			5		1			(4		)	906
Account and services fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees	165			—			2		—			(8		)	159
RJBDP fees	231			—			2		—			(85		)	148
Client account and other fees	60			2			15		—			(8		)	69
Total account and service fees	456			2			19		—			(101		)	376
Investment banking:
Merger & acquisition and advisory	—			206			—		—			—			206
Equity underwriting	15			45			—		—			—			60
Debt underwriting	—			34			—		—			—			34
Total investment banking	15			285			—		—			—			300
Other:
Tax credit fund revenues	—			33			—		—			—			33
All other ⁽¹⁾	16			2			—		12			5			35
Total other	16			35			—		12			5			68
Total non-interest revenues	2,534			527			334		13			(110		)	3,298
Interest income ⁽¹⁾	114			19			2		486			19			640
Total revenues	2,648			546			336		499			(91		)	3,938
Interest expense	(21		)	(16		)	—		(84		)	(27		)	(148		)
Net revenues	$	2,627		$	530		$	336	$	415		$	(118	)	$	3,790


(1)	These revenues are generally not in scope of the accounting guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.

At ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, net receivables related to contracts with customers were ~~$340~~$319 million and ~~$384~~$347 million, respectively.

We record deferred revenue from contracts with customers when payment is received prior to the performance of our obligation to the customer. Deferred revenue balances were not material as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

We have elected the practical expedient allowable by the accounting guidance to not disclose information about remaining performance obligations pertaining to contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1718 – INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE

The following table details the components of interest income and interest expense.


	Three months ended June 30,					Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019		2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Interest income:
Cash segregated pursuant to regulations	$	13	$	14		$	42		$	40
Assets segregated pursuant to regulations												$	11		$	17		$	22		$	32
Trading instruments	7		7			20			17			7			6			13			13
Available-for-sale securities	18		14			51			37			19			17			37			33
Margin loans	30		28			93			77			21			31			48			63
Bank loans, net of unearned income	221		186			655			519
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses												198			220			404			434
Loans to financial advisors	5		4			14			11			5			5			10			9
Corporate cash and all other	27		18			86			51			24			28			48			56
Total interest income	$	321	$	271		$	961		$	752		$	285		$	324		$	582		$	640
Interest expense:
Bank deposits	$	33	$	19		$	105		$	39		$	12		$	37		$	28		$	72
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased	2		2			6			5			1			2			2			4
Brokerage client payables	5		4			16			10			3			5			6			11
Other borrowings	5		6			16			17			5			5			10			11
Senior notes payable	19		19			55			55			19			18			37			36
Other	9		4			23			13			3			8			11			14
Total interest expense	73		54			221			139			43			75			94			148
Net interest income	248		217			740			613			242			249			488			492
Bank loan loss (provision)/benefit	5		(5		)	(16		)	(14		)
Net interest income after bank loan loss (provision)/benefit	$	253	$	212		$	724		$	599
Bank loan loss provision												(109		)	(5		)	(107		)	(21		)
Net interest income after bank loan loss provision												$	133		$	244		$	381		$	471

Interest expense related to bank deposits in the preceding table excludes interest expense associated with affiliate deposits, which has been eliminated in consolidation.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

NOTE 1819 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

We have ~~one~~1 share-based compensation plan for our employees, Board of Directors and non-employees (independent contractor financial advisors). ~~Effective during the three months ended June 30, 2019,~~Generally, we ~~generally~~ reissue our treasury shares under The Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan; however, we are also permitted to issue new shares. Annual share-based compensation awards are primarily issued during the first fiscal quarter of each year. Our share-based compensation accounting policies are described in Note 2 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. Other information related to our share-based awards is presented in Note 2021 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

During the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, we granted approximately ~~1.5~~100 thousand and 1.6 million RSUs, respectively, to employees and outside members of our Board of Directors with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of ~~$76.71. Grants for the three months ended June 30, 2019 were insignificant.~~$79.73 and $88.53, respectively. For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, total compensation expense for ~~restricted equity awards~~RSUs granted to our employees and members of our Board of Directors was ~~$20~~$27 million and ~~$81~~$67 million, respectively, compared with ~~$19~~$23 million and ~~$70~~$61 million, respectively, for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there were ~~$164~~$216 million of total pre-tax compensation costs not yet recognized ~~net~~(net of estimated ~~forfeitures,~~forfeitures) related to RSUs granted to employees and members of our Board of ~~Directors.~~Directors, including those granted during the six months ended March 31, 2020. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~3.0~~3.4 years.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1920 – REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

RJF, as a bank holding company and financial holding company, RJ Bank, ~~and~~ our broker-dealer subsidiaries and Raymond James Trust, N.A. (“RJ Trust”) are subject to capital requirements by various regulatory authorities. Capital levels of each entity are monitored to ensure compliance with our various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial results.

As a bank holding company, RJF is subject to the risk-based capital requirements of the Fed. These risk-based capital requirements are expressed as capital ratios that compare measures of regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, which involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory guidelines. RJF’s and RJ Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.

RJF and RJ Bank are required to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined), and under rules defined under the Basel III ~~standardized approach,~~capital framework, Common equity Tier 1 capital (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets. RJF and RJ Bank each calculate these ratios under the Basel III standardized approach in order to assess compliance with both regulatory requirements and their internal capital policies. The minimum CET1, Tier 1 capital, and Total capital ratios of RJF and RJ Bank are supplemented by a capital conservation buffer, consisting entirely of capital that qualifies as CET1, that became fully-phased in at 2.5% of risk-weighted assets on January 1, 2019. FailureIn order to maintain ~~the capital conservation buffer could limit~~ our ability to take certain capital actions, including dividends and common equity repurchases, and to make ~~discretionary~~ bonus ~~payments.~~payments, we must hold a capital conservation buffer above our minimum risk-based capital requirements. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, both RJF’s and RJ Bank’s capital levels exceeded the capital conservation buffer requirement and were each categorized as ~~“well capitalized.~~“well-capitalized.”

For further discussion of regulatory capital requirements applicable to certain of our businesses and subsidiaries, see Note 2122 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

To meet requirements for capital adequacy purposes or to be categorized as “well-capitalized,” RJF must maintain minimum CET1, Tier 1 capital, Total capital and Tier 1 leverage amounts and ratios as set forth in the following table.



	Actual				Requirement for capital adequacy purposes				To be well-capitalized under regulatory provisions
$ in millions	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
RJF as of March 31, 2020:
CET1	$	6,183	24.1	%	$	1,156	4.5	%	$	1,669	6.5	%
Tier 1 capital	$	6,183	24.1	%	$	1,541	6.0	%	$	2,054	8.0	%
Total capital	$	6,490	25.3	%	$	2,054	8.0	%	$	2,568	10.0	%
Tier 1 leverage	$	6,183	14.2	%	$	1,745	4.0	%	$	2,181	5.0	%

RJF as of September 30, 2019:
CET1	$	5,971	24.8	%	$	1,085	4.5	%	$	1,567	6.5	%
Tier 1 capital	$	5,971	24.8	%	$	1,446	6.0	%	$	1,928	8.0	%
Total capital	$	6,207	25.8	%	$	1,928	8.0	%	$	2,410	10.0	%
Tier 1 leverage	$	5,971	15.7	%	$	1,525	4.0	%	$	1,906	5.0	%

RJF’s Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios at March 31, 2020 decreased compared to September 30, 2019, due to the impact of increases to cash segregated pursuant to regulations and growth of bank assets, primarily bank loans, partially offset by the impact of higher equity due to positive earnings, net of share repurchases and dividends. RJF’s Tier 1 leverage ratio at March 31, 2020 decreased compared to September 30, 2019 due to the growth of average assets, primarily related to cash, cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations, and bank loans, partially offset by the aforementioned change in equity.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

To meet requirements for capital adequacy purposes or to be categorized as “well capitalized,” RJF must maintain minimum CET1, Tier 1 capital, Total capital and Tier 1 leverage amounts and ratios as set forth in the following table.

Actual
Requirement for capital
adequacy purposes

To be well capitalized
under regulatory provisions
$ in millions Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
RJF as of June 30, 2019:
CET1 $ 5,854
24.2 % $ 1,089
4.5 % $ 1,572
6.5 %
Tier 1 capital $ 5,854
24.2 % $ 1,451
6.0 % $ 1,935
8.0 %
Total capital $ 6,089
25.2 % $ 1,935
8.0 % $ 2,419
10.0 %
Tier 1 leverage $ 5,854
15.7 % $ 1,496
4.0 % $ 1,870
5.0 %

RJF as of September 30, 2018:
CET1 $ 5,718
24.3 % $ 1,057
4.5 % $ 1,527
6.5 %
Tier 1 capital $ 5,718
24.3 % $ 1,410
6.0 % $ 1,880
8.0 %
Total capital $ 5,941
25.3 % $ 1,880
8.0 % $ 2,350
10.0 %
Tier 1 leverage $ 5,718
15.8 % $ 1,451
4.0 % $ 1,814
5.0 %

~~RJF’s Tier 1 and Total capital ratios at~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~decreased slightly compared to~~ ~~September 30, 2018, as the impacts of share repurchases and the growth of the bank loan portfolio during the nine months ended June 30, 2019 were offset by positive earnings during the current period.~~

~~To meet~~ the requirements for capital adequacy or to be categorized as ~~“well capitalized,~~“well-capitalized,” RJ Bank must maintain CET1, Tier 1 capital, Total capital and Tier 1 leverage amounts and ratios as set forth in the following table.


	Actual				Requirement for capital adequacy purposes				To be well capitalized under regulatory provisions				Actual				Requirement for capital adequacy purposes				To be well-capitalized under regulatory provisions
$ in millions	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
RJ Bank as of June 30, 2019:
RJ Bank as of March 31, 2020:
CET1	$	2,190	12.8	%	$	768	4.5	%	$	1,109	6.5	%	$	2,232	12.7	%	$	792	4.5	%	$	1,144	6.5	%
Tier 1 capital	$	2,190	12.8	%	$	1,024	6.0	%	$	1,365	8.0	%	$	2,232	12.7	%	$	1,056	6.0	%	$	1,408	8.0	%
Total capital	$	2,403	14.1	%	$	1,365	8.0	%	$	1,706	10.0	%	$	2,454	13.9	%	$	1,408	8.0	%	$	1,760	10.0	%
Tier 1 leverage	$	2,190	8.8	%	$	991	4.0	%	$	1,239	5.0	%	$	2,232	8.1	%	$	1,102	4.0	%	$	1,377	5.0	%

RJ Bank as of September 30, 2018:
RJ Bank as of September 30, 2019:
CET1	$	2,029	12.7	%	$	721	4.5	%	$	1,042	6.5	%	$	2,246	13.2	%	$	764	4.5	%	$	1,103	6.5	%
Tier 1 capital	$	2,029	12.7	%	$	961	6.0	%	$	1,282	8.0	%	$	2,246	13.2	%	$	1,018	6.0	%	$	1,358	8.0	%
Total capital	$	2,229	13.9	%	$	1,282	8.0	%	$	1,602	10.0	%	$	2,458	14.5	%	$	1,358	8.0	%	$	1,697	10.0	%
Tier 1 leverage	$	2,029	8.8	%	$	926	4.0	%	$	1,158	5.0	%	$	2,246	8.8	%	$	1,021	4.0	%	$	1,276	5.0	%

RJ Bank’s Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios at ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~increased slightly~~March 31, 2020 decreased compared to September 30, ~~2018~~2019 due to dividends paid during the period exceeding earnings and growth in assets, primarily bank loans. RJ Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio at March 31, 2020 decreased compared to September 30, 2019 due to the ~~impact of positive earnings during~~growth in average assets, primarily related to cash and bank loans, as well as the ~~current period, partially offset by growth of the bank loan portfolio.~~aforementioned change in equity.

Certain of our broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following table presents the net capital position of RJ&A.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019			September 30, 2018			March 31, 2020			September 30, 2019
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
(Alternative Method elected)
Net capital as a percent of aggregate debit items	41.9		%	28.2		%	41.5		%	39.7		%
Net capital	$	1,088		$	934		$	1,122		$	1,056
Less: required net capital	(52		)	(66		)	(54		)	(53		)
Excess net capital	$	1,036		$	868		$	1,068		$	1,003

As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, RJFS, RJ Ltd., RJ Trust and all of our other active regulated domestic and international subsidiaries were in compliance with and exceeded all applicable capital requirements.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 2021 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share.


	Three months ended June 30,					Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
in millions, except per share amounts	2019			2018		2019			2018			2020		2019		2020			2019
Income for basic earnings per common share:
Net income attributable to RJF	$	259		$	232	$	769		$	594
Net income												$	169	$	261	$	437		$	510
Less allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities	(1		)	—		(1		)	(1		)	—		—		(1		)	—
Net income attributable to RJF common shareholders	$	258		$	232	$	768		$	593		$	169	$	261	$	436		$	510
Income for diluted earnings per common share:
Net income attributable to RJF	$	259		$	232	$	769		$	594
Net income												$	169	$	261	$	437		$	510
Less allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities	(1		)	—		(1		)	(1		)	—		—		(1		)	—
Net income attributable to RJF common shareholders	$	258		$	232	$	768		$	593		$	169	$	261	$	436		$	510
Common shares:
Average common shares in basic computation	140.4			145.6		141.8			145.2			138.4		140.8		138.4			142.5
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and certain RSUs	3.2			3.8		3.0			3.6			2.7		3.1		2.9			2.9
Average common shares used in diluted computation	143.6			149.4		144.8			148.8			141.1		143.9		141.3			145.4
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.84		$	1.59	$	5.42		$	4.08		$	1.22	$	1.85	$	3.15		$	3.58
Diluted	$	1.80		$	1.55	$	5.30		$	3.99		$	1.20	$	1.81	$	3.09		$	3.51
Stock options and certain RSUs excluded from weighted-average diluted common shares because their effect would be antidilutive	0.2			0.2		0.5			1.1			0.7		0.5		0.6			1.6

The allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities in the preceding table represents dividends paid during the period to participating securities plus an allocation of undistributed earnings to participating securities. Participating securities represent unvested restricted stock and certain RSUs. Participating securities and related dividends paid on these participating securities were insignificant for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Undistributed earnings are allocated to participating securities based upon their right to share in earnings if all earnings for the period had been distributed.

Dividends per common share declared and paid are detailed in the following table for each respective period.


	Three months ended June 30,				Nine months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Dividends per common share - declared	$	0.34	$	0.30	$	1.02	$	0.80	$	0.37	$	0.34	$	0.74	$	0.68
Dividends per common share - paid	$	0.34	$	0.25	$	0.98	$	0.72	$	0.37	$	0.34	$	0.71	$	0.64

NOTE 2122 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

We currently operate through the following ~~five~~5 segments: ~~PCG;~~Private Client Group (“PCG”); Capital Markets; Asset Management; RJ Bank; and Other.

The ~~business~~ segments are determined based upon factors such as the services provided and the distribution channels served and are consistent with how we assess performance and determine how to allocate our resources throughout our subsidiaries. For a further discussion of our ~~business~~ segments, see Note 2324 of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following tables present information concerning operations in these ~~segments of business.~~segments.


	Three months ended June 30,						Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Revenues:
Net revenues:
Private Client Group	$	1,361		$	1,287		$	4,009		$	3,803		$	1,495		$	1,271		$	2,909		$	2,627
Capital Markets	261			252			807			711			290			277			558			530
Asset Management	177			168			513			482			184			162			368			336
RJ Bank	253			213			752			588			210			212			426			415
Other	15			16			55			53			(44		)	—			(52		)	2
Intersegment eliminations	(67		)	(45		)	(198		)	(123		)	(67		)	(63		)	(132		)	(120		)
Total revenues	$	2,000		$	1,891		$	5,938		$	5,514
Income/(loss) excluding noncontrolling interests and before provision for income taxes:
Total net revenues													$	2,068		$	1,859		$	4,077		$	3,790
Pre-tax income/(loss):
Private Client Group	$	140		$	132		$	436		$	445		$	170		$	132		$	323		$	296
Capital Markets	24			22			77			43			28			41			57			53
Asset Management	65			58			184			171			73			55			146			119
RJ Bank	138			130			384			362			14			136			149			246
Other	(25		)	(24		)	(60		)	(60		)	(46		)	(17		)	(77		)	(35		)
Pre-tax income excluding noncontrolling interests	342			318			1,021			961
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	(2		)	—			(16		)	—
Income including noncontrolling interests and before provision for income taxes	$	340		$	318		$	1,005		$	961
Total pre-tax income													$	239		$	347		$	598		$	679

No individual client accounted for more than ten percent of ~~total~~ revenues in any of the periods presented.


	Three months ended June 30,						Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Net interest income/(expense):
Private Client Group	$	46		$	42		$	139		$	121		$	38		$	47		$	79		$	93
Capital Markets	—			—			3			3			4			1			6			3
Asset Management	1			—			3			1			—			1			1			2
RJ Bank	208			180			610			515			205			205			415			402
Other and intersegment eliminations	(7		)	(5		)	(15		)	(27		)	(5		)	(5		)	(13		)	(8		)
Net interest income	$	248		$	217		$	740		$	613		$	242		$	249		$	488		$	492

The following table presents our total assets on a segment basis.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Total assets:
Private Client Group	$	8,877	$	10,173	$	12,531	$	9,042
Capital Markets	2,420		2,279		2,118		2,287
Asset Management	390		387		348		401
RJ Bank	25,501		22,922		33,434		25,516
Other	1,489		1,652		1,378		1,584
Total	$	38,677	$	37,413	$	49,809	$	38,830

The following table presents goodwill, which was included in our total assets, on a segment basis.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Goodwill:
Private Client Group	$	276	$	276	$	274	$	275
Capital Markets	139		133		120		120
Asset Management	69		69		69		69
Total	$	484	$	478	$	463	$	464

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Europe. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the U.S. The following table presents our net revenues and pre-tax income ~~before provision for income taxes and excluding noncontrolling interests,~~ classified by major geographic area in which they were earned.


	Three months ended June 30,					Nine months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,					Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019		2018			2019			2018			2020			2019		2020			2019
Revenues:
Net revenues:
U.S.	$	1,858	$	1,750		$	5,508		$	5,094		$	1,920		$	1,729	$	3,795		$	3,525
Canada	110		107			321			316			112			90		207			189
Europe	32		34			109			104			36			40		75			76
Total	$	2,000	$	1,891		$	5,938		$	5,514		$	2,068		$	1,859	$	4,077		$	3,790

Pre-tax income/(loss) excluding noncontrolling interests:
Pre-tax income/(loss):
U.S.	$	330	$	303		$	994		$	925		$	227		$	334	$	579		$	664
Canada	12		16			35			39			13			7		21			23
Europe ⁽¹⁾	—		(1		)	(8		)	(3		)	(1		)	6		(2		)	(8		)
Total	$	342	$	318		$	1,021		$	961		$	239		$	347	$	598		$	679


(1)	The pre-tax loss in Europe for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 reflects a $15 million loss on the sale of our operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities incurred during the first fiscal quarter of 2019.

The following table presents our total assets by major geographic area in which they were held.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Total assets:
U.S.	$	35,909	$	34,651	$	46,507	$	35,978
Canada	2,673		2,673		3,189		2,754
Europe	95		89		113		98
Total	$	38,677	$	37,413	$	49,809	$	38,830

The following table presents goodwill, which was included in our total assets, classified by major geographic area in which it was held.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019
Goodwill:
U.S.	$	433	$	426	$	433	$	433
Canada	42		43		22		23
Europe	9		9		8		8
Total	$	484	$	478	$	463	$	464

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



INDEX
	PAGE
Factors affecting “forward-looking statements”	5349
Introduction	5349
Executive overview	5349
Segments	5652
Reconciliation of GAAP measures to non-GAAP financial measures	5753
Net interest analysis	5853
Results of Operations
Private Client Group	6156
Capital Markets	6560
Asset Management	6661
RJ Bank	6964
Other	7468
Certain statistical disclosures by bank holding companies	7469
Liquidity and capital resources	75
~~Sources of liquidity~~	7670
Statement of financial condition analysis	7973
Contractual obligations	7974
Regulatory	7974
Critical accounting estimates	8075
Recent accounting developments	8176
Off-balance sheet arrangements	8176
Effects of inflation	8176
Risk management	8176

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Factors affecting “forward-looking statements”

Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include information concerning future strategic objectives, business prospects, anticipated savings, financial results (including expenses, earnings, liquidity, cash flow and capital expenditures), industry or market conditions, demand for and pricing of our products, acquisitions and divestitures, anticipated results of litigation, ~~changes in tax rules and~~ our effective tax rate, regulatory developments, effects of accounting pronouncements, and general economic conditions. In addition, words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” ~~“intends,”~~ “plans,” “estimates,~~” “projects,” “forecasts,~~” and future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” and “would,” as well as any other statement that necessarily depends on future events, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees, and they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. We caution investors not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements and urge you to carefully consider the risks described in our filings with the SEC from time to time, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which are available at www.raymondjames.com and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statement in the event it later turns out to be inaccurate, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Introduction

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the results of our operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. Where “NM” is used in various percentage change computations, the computed percentage change has been determined to be not meaningful.

We operate as a financial holding company and bank holding company. Results in the businesses in which we operate are highly correlated to general economic conditions and, more specifically, to the direction of the U.S. equity and fixed income markets, changes in interest rates, market volatility, corporate and mortgage lending markets and commercial and residential credit trends. Overall market conditions, ~~interest rates,~~ economic, political and regulatory trends, and industry competition are among the factors which could affect us and which are unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors affect the financial decisions made by market participants, ~~who include~~including investors, borrowers, and competitors, impacting their level of participation in the financial markets. These factors also impact the level of investment banking activity and asset valuations, which ultimately affect our business results.

Executive overview

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

~~Net revenues were $1.93 billion for~~On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency due to the impact of the pandemic. As a result of the spread of COVID-19, governments and other authorities around the world have imposed measures intended to control the spread of the disease, including restrictions on travel and the conduct of business, such as stay-at-home orders, quarantines, travel bans, border closings, business closures and other similar measures. In response, we activated our business continuity plan endeavoring to safeguard our employees, with nearly all of our employees now working remotely, while still maintaining our standard of client service. Our systems and infrastructure have continued to support the increased volumes of activity, without any significant operational or technology disruptions.

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on our business during our quarter ended March 31, 2020, as the spread of the disease and measures intended to prevent its spread have caused significant volatility and disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the U.S. We expect the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to prevent its spread to have a more significant impact on the remainder of fiscal 2020 than it did during the quarter ~~an increase~~ended March 31, 2020, although the extent of ~~$90~~such effects will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, net revenues of $2.07 billion increased $209 million, or ~~5%.~~11%, compared with the prior-year quarter. Pre-tax income of ~~$342~~$239 million ~~increased $24~~decreased $108 million, or ~~8%. Our~~31%, and net income of ~~$259~~$169 million ~~increased $27~~decreased $92 million, or ~~12%~~35%, both primarily due to a significant increase in the bank loan loss provision in response to the rapid and ~~our~~widespread economic deterioration caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our earnings per diluted share were ~~$1.80,~~$1.20, reflecting a ~~16% increase. We generated an~~34% decrease. Our annualized return on equity (“ROE”) for the quarter ~~of 16.1%~~was 9.9%, compared with ~~15.4%~~16.7% in the ~~prior year~~prior-year quarter, and our annualized return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”) ⁽¹⁾was 10.8%, compared with 18.5% for the prior-year quarter. ~~During~~

The $209 million increase in net revenues compared with the prior-year quarter primarily reflected higher asset management and related administrative fees, attributable to higher PCG assets in fee-based accounts at the beginning of the quarter, which were 31% higher than fee-based assets as of the beginning of the prior-year quarter. Brokerage revenues also increased during the quarter as the significant market volatility in March drove an increase in client activity. Offsetting these increases, other revenues were negatively impacted by valuation losses on private equity investments, a portion of which was attributable to noncontrolling interests, which was reflected as an offset in other expenses. RJBDP fees and net interest income were negatively impacted by lower short-term interest rates.

Compensation, commissions and benefits expense increased $197 million, or 16%, due to an increase in compensable net revenues, which primarily include asset management and related administrative fees, brokerage revenues, and investment banking revenues, as well as increased staffing levels required to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

Non-compensation expenses increased $120 million, or 42%, primarily due to the aforementioned bank loan loss provision of $109 million.

Pursuant to our Board of Directors’ share repurchase authorization, we repurchased approximately ~~1.04~~2.5 million shares of common stock ~~under our repurchase authorization by~~during the ~~Board of Directors (the “Board”)~~quarter for ~~$85~~$202 million at an average price of approximately ~~$81.70~~$79 per share. AsDue to the heightened market uncertainty as a result of ~~June 30, 2019,~~the COVID-19 crisis, share buybacks have been suspended since mid-March and, as of March 31, 2020, we had ~~$373~~$537 million of availability remaining under this authorization.

The ~~$90~~firm ended the quarter with capital ratios well in excess of regulatory requirements and substantial liquidity, with nearly $2 billion⁽²⁾ of cash at the parent company, which included the proceeds of a $500 million 10-year senior notes issuance in March.

Certain of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic will affect our results in future quarters to a greater extent than in the second fiscal quarter. Equity market declines toward the end of the quarter drove a 14% decline in fee-based assets and a 15% decline in financial assets under management as of March 31, 2020, which will negatively impact asset management and related administrative fees in our PCG and Asset Management segments in our third fiscal quarter of 2020. Our net interest income and RJBDP fees from third-party banks will be negatively affected by the full impact of the 150 basis point reduction in March by the Federal Reserve in its benchmark short-term interest rate. In Capital Markets, while our investment banking pipeline remains healthy, it is likely that we will experience a near-term slowdown in mergers & acquisitions and underwriting activity due to market uncertainty. In addition, if market volatility declines, it is likely that brokerage revenues will decline compared with the second fiscal quarter of 2020. While our results during the second quarter were negatively impacted by the bank loan loss provision and private equity valuation losses, further market deterioration could result in additional provisions and losses in future quarters.

A summary of our financial results by segment as compared to the prior-year quarter is as follows:

Our PCG segment net revenues of $1.50 billion increased 18%, while pre-tax income of $170 million increased 29%. The increase in net revenues was primarily attributable to an increase in asset management and related administrative fees due to higher assets in fee-based accounts at the beginning of the quarter, as well as an increase in brokerage revenues due to strong client activity driven by market volatility toward the end of the quarter. Non-interest expenses increased $186 million, or 16%, primarily resulting from an increase in compensation expenses due to the growth in compensable net revenues and higher staffing levels to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

Capital Markets net revenues of $290 million increased 5% and pre-tax income of $28 million decreased 32%. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to an increase in brokerage revenues due to higher client activity as a result of market volatility, as well as an increase in equity underwriting revenues. These increases were partially offset by a decline in merger

(1) “ROTCE” is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the “Reconciliation of GAAP measures to non-GAAP financial measures” in this MD&A for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, and for other important disclosures.


(2)	For additional information, please see the “Liquidity and capital resources - Sources of liquidity” section in this MD&A.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

& acquisition revenues compared with a strong prior-year quarter. Non-interest expenses increased $26 million, or 11%, primarily resulting from an increase in compensation expense, primarily due to the mix of revenues.

Our Asset Management segment net revenues of $184 million increased 14% and pre-tax income of $73 million increased 33%. The increase in net revenues was driven by higher average financial assets under management, as well as higher beginning assets in programs for which the segment provides administrative support.

RJ Bank net revenues of $210 million decreased 1% and pre-tax income of $14 million decreased 90%. Net revenues were essentially flat as higher interest-earning banking assets offset the negative impact from lower short-term interest rates. Non-interest expenses increased $120 million, or 158%, as RJ Bank recorded a loan loss provision of $109 million compared to $5 million in the prior-year quarter, in response to the impact of COVID-19.

Our Other segment reflected a pre-tax loss that was $29 million larger compared to the prior-year quarter, primarily the result of private equity valuation losses in the current-year quarter compared with gains of in the prior-year quarter.

Six months ended March 31, 2020 compared with the six months ended March 31, 2019

Net revenues of $4.08 billion increased $287 million, or 8%. Pre-tax income of $598 million decreased $81 million, or 12%. Our net income of $437 million decreased $73 million, or 14%, and our earnings per diluted share were $3.09, reflecting a 12% decrease. Our annualized ROE during the six months ended March 31, 2020 was 13.0%, compared with 16.2% for the prior-year period, and annualized ROTCE ⁽¹⁾ was 14.2%, compared with 17.9% for the prior-year period.

The $287 million increase in net revenues ~~primarily reflected~~compared with the prior-year period reflects higher asset management and related administrative fees, primarily attributable to higher PCG assets in fee-based accounts at the beginning of the current-year periods. Brokerage revenues also increased, primarily due to higher market volatility in our second fiscal quarter. Offsetting these increases, other revenues were negatively impacted by valuation losses on private equity investments, a portion of which was attributable to noncontrolling interests, which was reflected as an offset in other expenses. RJBDP fees and net interest income ~~partially offset by~~were negatively impacted due to lower brokerage revenues. Total client assets under administration of $824.2 billion at June 30, 2019 increased $70 billion, or 9%, over the prior year, reflecting the net addition of financial advisors and equity market appreciation since the prior year quarter.short-term interest rates.

~~Non-interest expenses~~Compensation, commissions and benefits expense increased ~~$68~~$283 million, or ~~4%. The~~11%, due to an increase ~~primarily resulted from increased compensation-related expenses associated with the increase~~ in compensable net revenues, as well as increased staffing levels required to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

~~A summary of our financial results by segment as compared to the prior year quarter is as follows:~~

Our PCG segment generated net revenues of $1.35 billion, an increase of 6%, and pre-tax income also increased 6% to $140 million. The segment benefited from an increase in asset management and related administrative fees, primarily due to starting

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

the quarter with higher assets in fee-based accounts compared to the balances at the beginning of the prior year quarter. Account and service fees also increased due to fees related to RJBDP, the majority of which related to an increase in the per-account servicing fee from RJ Bank effective October1, 2018 (which eliminates in consolidation). These increases were offset by a decline in brokerage revenues. Non-interestNon-compensation expenses increased ~~$64~~$85 million, or 6%14%, primarily due to ~~an increase in compensation-related expenses.~~

~~Capital Markets net revenues of $251~~a $107 million ~~increased 3% and pre-tax income increased 9% to $24 million. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to an increase in fixed income brokerage revenues,~~bank loan loss provision compared with a $21 million bank loan loss provision for the prior-year period, partially offset by ~~a decline in equity brokerage revenues and investment banking revenues. Non-interest expenses increased $4 million, or 2%, reflecting an increase in professional fees due to~~ the ~~gross-up of certain investment banking transaction-related expenses which were netted against revenues in previous years.~~

Our Asset Management segment net revenues of $177 million increased 5% and pre-tax income increased 12% to $65 million. Financial assets under management of $143.1 billion increased 6% over the prior year quarter primarily due to equity market appreciation and positive inflows from clients moving to fee-based alternatives from traditional transaction-based accounts.

RJ Bank net revenues of $215 million increased 14% and pre-tax income increased 6% to $138 million. The increase in net revenues resulted from an increase in net interest income due to growth in interest-earning assets and an increase in net interest margin, which was helped by higher short-term interest rates. Non-interest expenses increased $19 million, or 33%, largely due to the aforementioned increase in the per-account RJBDP servicing fee paid to PCG.

Our Other segment reflected a pre-tax loss that was comparable to the loss generated in the prior year quarter, as a decrease in private equity gains compared to the prior year quarter was offset by an increase in interest income, which was positively impacted by an increase in interest rates earned on higher corporate cash balances.

~~Nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2018~~

Net revenues of $5.72 billion increased $342 million, or 6%. Pre-tax income of $1.02 billion increased $60 million, or 6%. Our net income of $769 million increased $175 million, or 29%, compared with the prior year period, which included a loss of $117 million related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”), and our earnings per diluted share were $5.30, reflecting a 33% increase. We achieved an annualized return on equity during the nine months ended June 30, 2019 of 16.2%, compared with 13.6% for the prior year period.

~~Excluding a~~ $15 million loss on the sale of our operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities ~~in December 2018, adjusted net income was $784 million~~⁽¹⁾~~, anincrease of 10% compared with adjusted net income of $714 million~~⁽¹⁾ ~~for the prior year period. Adjusted earnings per diluted share were $5.41~~⁽¹⁾~~, a 13% increase compared with adjusted earnings per diluted share of $4.79~~⁽¹⁾ ~~for the prior year period. Our adjusted annualized return on equity for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 was 16.4%~~⁽¹⁾~~, compared with adjusted annualized return on equity of 16.0%~~⁽¹⁾ ~~for the prior year period.~~

The $342 million increase in net revenues compared with the prior year period reflected higher asset management and related administrative fees, net interest income and investment banking revenues. Partially offsetting these increases, brokerage revenues declined compared with the prior year period.

Non-interest expenses increased $298 million, or 7%. The increase primarily resulted from higher compensation-related expenses associated with the increase in net revenues, as well as increased staffing levels required to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements. Other expenses were also higher, primarily related to losses on a consolidated tax credit fund, which were substantially offset in noncontrolling interests. Our acquisition and disposition-related expensesthat occurred in the ~~current year period included the aforementioned $15 million loss on the sale of our operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities.~~prior-year period.

Our effective income tax rate was ~~25.1%~~26.9% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019, reflecting a federal corporate statutory~~March 31, 2020, an increase compared with the 24.8% effective tax rate ~~of 21% as result of the Tax Act enacted in December 2017. We estimate our effective income tax rate to be approximately 25-26%~~ for fiscal year ~~2019. Our future effective income tax rate may be impacted positively or negatively by non-taxable items (such as~~2019, primarily due to the ~~gains or~~unfavorable impact in the current-year period of non-deductible valuation losses ~~earned on~~associated with our company-owned life insurance ~~and tax-exempt interest), non-deductible expenses (such as meals and entertainment and certain executive compensation) as well as vesting and exercises of equity compensation.~~policies.

~~1) “Adjusted net income,” “adjusted earnings per diluted~~Pursuant to our Board of Directors’ share” and “adjusted annualized return on equity” are each non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the “Reconciliation of GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures” in this MD&A, for a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, and for other important disclosures.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

~~During the nine months ended June 30, 2019,~~ repurchase authorization, we repurchased ~~7.70~~approximately 2.7 million shares of common stock ~~under our Board repurchase authorization~~during the six months ended March 31, 2020 for ~~$591~~$213 million at an average price of approximately ~~$76.70~~$80 per share. ~~As of June 30, 2019, we had $373 million of availability remaining under this authorization.~~

A summary of our financial results by segment as compared to the ~~prior year~~prior-year period is as follows:

~~Our~~ PCG segment ~~generated~~ net revenues of ~~$3.98~~$2.91 billion ~~a 5% increase,~~increased 11%, while pre-tax income of ~~$436~~$323 million ~~decreased 2%~~increased 9%. The increase in net revenues was primarily attributable to an increase in asset management and related administrative fees ~~primarily~~ due to higher assets in fee-based accounts ~~compared with~~at the ~~prior year period. The segment also benefited from~~beginning of the current-year periods, as well as an increase in ~~account and service fees related~~brokerage revenues due to ~~RJBDP, the majority of which related to an increase~~strong client activity driven by market volatility in ~~the per-account servicing fee from RJ Bank. These~~our second fiscal quarter. Offsetting these increases were ~~partially offset by a decline~~decreases in ~~brokerage revenues.~~RJBDP fees from third-party banks and net interest income due to lower short-term interest rates. Non-interest expenses increased ~~$203~~$255 million, or 6%11%, primarily resulting from an increase in ~~financial advisor compensation-related~~compensation expenses ~~in line with~~due to the growth in ~~revenues. Non-compensation expenses also increased $26 million, or 6% over the prior year period.~~compensable net revenues and higher staffing levels to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

Capital Markets net revenues of ~~$781~~$558 million increased ~~13%~~5% and pre-tax income of $57 million increased ~~significantly to $77 million.~~8%. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to an increase in ~~investment banking revenues, largely due to merger & acquisition activity. The decline in equity brokerage revenues was offset by an increase in~~ fixed income brokerage revenues, ~~compared with the prior year period.~~due to higher client activity driven by market volatility, as well as an increase in equity and debt underwriting revenues. These increases were partially offset by a decline in merger & acquisition and advisory revenues. Non-interest expenses increased ~~$66 million, or 10%~~5%, ~~primarily~~ due to higher compensation

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

expenses, as a result of the increase in revenues, and higher business development expenses, professional fees and other expenses. These increases were partially offset by the aforementioned $15 million loss on the sale of our operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities ~~an increase~~ in ~~compensation-related expenses and an increase in professional fees due to~~ the ~~gross-up of certain investment banking transaction-related expenses, which were previously netted against revenues.~~prior-year period.

Our Asset Management segment net revenues of ~~$513~~$368 million increased 6%10% and pre-tax income of $146 million increased ~~8% to $184 million.~~23%. The increase in net revenues was driven by higher average financial assets under management, as well as higher assets at the beginning of each of the current-year quarters in programs for which the segment provides administrative support.

RJ Bank net revenues of $426 million increased 3% and pre-tax income of $149 million decreased 39%. The increase in net revenues reflected ~~increases in fees from managed programs, a full period of results for Scout Investments and its Reams Asset Management division (“the Scout Group”), which was acquired in November 2017, and~~ higher ~~asset-based administration fees. Non-interest expenses increased $22 million, or 7%, primarily resulting from increased expenses related to the addition of the Scout Group.~~

~~RJ Bank net revenues increased 18% to $630 million and pre-tax income increased 6% to $384 million. The increase in net revenues primarily resulted from an increase in~~ net interest income due to growth in interest-earning assets, ~~and an increase in~~which more than offset the lower net interest margin ~~lifted~~caused by ~~higher~~lower short-term interest rates. Non-interest expenses increased ~~$76~~$108 million, or ~~45%~~64%, ~~primarily reflecting~~due to an $86 million increase in the loan loss provision, as well as an increase in fees for RJBDP ~~servicing fees~~ paid to ~~PCG largely due to an increase in the per-account fee effective October 1, 2018.~~PCG.

Our Other segment reflected a pre-tax loss that was ~~flat~~$42 million larger compared to the ~~prior year~~prior-year period, ~~as lower gains on~~primarily due to private equity ~~investments were offset by an increase~~valuation losses, as compared to gains in the prior-year period, and lower interest ~~income.~~

income on corporate cash balances due to lower short-term interest rates.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Segments

We currently operate through five segments. Our business segments are ~~Private Client Group,~~PCG, Capital Markets, Asset Management and RJ Bank. Our Other segment includes our private equity investments, ~~as well as~~interest income on certain corporate cash balances, and certain corporate overhead costs of RJF, ~~that are not allocated to business segments,~~ including the interest costs on our public debt.

The following table presents our consolidated and segment net revenues and pre-tax income/(loss)~~, the latter excluding noncontrolling interests,~~ for the periods indicated.


	Three months ended June 30,								Nine months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			% change		2019			2018			% change		2020			2019			% change		2020			2019			% change
Total company
Net revenues	$	1,927		$	1,837		5	%	$	5,717		$	5,375		6	%	$	2,068		$	1,859		11	%	$	4,077		$	3,790		8	%
Pre-tax income	$	342		$	318		8	%	$	1,021		$	961		6	%	$	239		$	347		(31	)%	$	598		$	679		(12	)%

Private Client Group
Net revenues	$	1,351		$	1,279		6	%	$	3,978		$	3,784		5	%	$	1,495		$	1,271		18	%	$	2,909		$	2,627		11	%
Pre-tax income	$	140		$	132		6	%	$	436		$	445		(2	)%	$	170		$	132		29	%	$	323		$	296		9	%

Capital Markets
Net revenues	$	251		$	243		3	%	$	781		$	690		13	%	$	290		$	277		5	%	$	558		$	530		5	%
Pre-tax income	$	24		$	22		9	%	$	77		$	43		79	%	$	28		$	41		(32	)%	$	57		$	53		8	%

Asset Management
Net revenues	$	177		$	168		5	%	$	513		$	482		6	%	$	184		$	162		14	%	$	368		$	336		10	%
Pre-tax income	$	65		$	58		12	%	$	184		$	171		8	%	$	73		$	55		33	%	$	146		$	119		23	%

RJ Bank
Net revenues	$	215		$	188		14	%	$	630		$	532		18	%	$	210		$	212		(1	)%	$	426		$	415		3	%
Pre-tax income	$	138		$	130		6	%	$	384		$	362		6	%	$	14		$	136		(90	)%	$	149		$	246		(39	)%

Other
Net revenues	$	(4	)	$	(2	)	(100	)%	$	(2	)	$	(3	)	33	%	$	(44	)	$	—		NM		$	(52	)	$	2		NM
Pre-tax loss	$	(25	)	$	(24	)	(4	)%	$	(60	)	$	(60	)	—		$	(46	)	$	(17	)	(171	)%	$	(77	)	$	(35	)	(120	)%

Intersegment eliminations
Net revenues	$	(63	)	$	(39	)			$	(183	)	$	(110	)			$	(67	)	$	(63	)	NM		$	(132	)	$	(120	)	NM

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Reconciliation of GAAP measures to non-GAAP financial measures

We utilize certain non-GAAP financial measures to aid in, and enhance, the understanding of our financial results and related measures. These non-GAAP financial measures have been separately identified in this document. We believe that the non-GAAP measures provide useful information by excluding certain material items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. We believe that these non-GAAP measures allow for better evaluation of the operating performance of the business and facilitate aannualized return on tangible common equity is meaningful to investors as this measure facilitates comparison of our results into the ~~current period to those in prior and future periods. In the following table, the tax effect~~results of other companies. This non-GAAP ~~adjustments reflects the statutory tax rate associated with each non-GAAP item. These non-GAAP measures~~financial measure should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, ~~our~~this non-GAAP ~~measures~~financial measure may not be comparable to ~~similarly-titled~~similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other companies. The following table provides a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP ~~measures to non-GAAP measures~~financial measure for the periods ~~which include non-GAAP adjustments. There were no non-GAAP adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.~~indicated.

Nine months ended June 30,
$ in millions, except per share amounts 2019 2018
Net income $ 769
$ 594
Non-GAAP adjustments:

Acquisition and disposition-related expenses 15
4
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments —
(1 )
Impact of the Tax Act —
117
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax 15
120
Adjusted net income $ 784
$ 714
Less allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities (1 ) (1 )
Adjusted net income attributable to RJF common shareholders $ 783
$ 713

Earnings per common share:

Basic $ 5.42
$ 4.08
Diluted $ 5.30
$ 3.99
Adjusted basic $ 5.52
$ 4.91
Adjusted diluted $ 5.41
$ 4.79

Average equity $ 6,345
$ 5,844
Annualized return on equity 16.2 % 13.6 %
Adjusted average equity $ 6,356
$ 5,934
Adjusted annualized return on equity 16.4 % 16.0 %

~~Net income in the preceding table excludes noncontrolling interests.~~



	Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2020			2019			2020			2019
Average equity	$	6,820		$	6,255		$	6,740		$	6,292
Less:
Average goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, net	606			632			608			634
Average deferred tax liabilities, net	(31		)	(35		)	(30		)	(34		)
Average tangible common equity	$	6,245		$	5,658		$	6,162		$	5,692

Return on equity	9.9		%	16.7		%	13.0		%	16.2		%
Return on tangible common equity	10.8		%	18.5		%	14.2		%	17.9		%

Return on equity is computed by dividing annualized net income ~~attributable to RJF~~ for the period indicated by average equity ~~attributable to RJF~~ for each respective period or, in the case of ~~adjusted~~ return on tangible common equity, computed by dividing annualized ~~adjusted~~ net income ~~attributable to RJF~~ by ~~adjusted~~ average tangible common equity ~~attributable to RJF~~ for each respective period.

Average equity for the ~~year to date~~quarter-to-date period is computed by adding the total equity attributable to ~~RJF~~Raymond James Financial, Inc. as of the date indicated to the prior quarter-end total, and dividing by two, or in the case of average tangible common equity, computed by adding tangible common equity as of the date indicated to the prior quarter-end total, and dividing by two. Average equity for the year-to-date period is computed by adding the total equity attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc. as of each quarter-end date during the indicated year-to-date period to the beginning of the year total, and dividing by ~~four. Adjusted~~three, or in the case of average tangible common equity, is computed by ~~adjusting for~~adding tangible common equity as of each quarter-end date during the ~~impact on average equity~~indicated year-to-date period to the beginning of the ~~non-GAAP adjustments, as applicable for each respective period.~~

~~For more information on acquisition~~year total, and disposition-related expenses, see “Results of Operations - Capital Markets” and “Results of Operations - Other” of this MD&A. For more information on the impact of the Tax Act, see Note 16 of our 2018 Form 10-K.dividing by three.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Net interest analysis

In response to macroeconomic concerns resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, The Federal Reserve ~~Bank announced an increase of 25 basis points in~~decreased its benchmark short-term interest rate ~~in December 2018, as it did in each~~twice toward the end of our second fiscal quarter to a range of 0-0.25%, for a total decrease of 150 basis points during the ~~quarters in fiscal year 2018 and three of the quarters in fiscal year 2017.~~quarter. These ~~increases~~decreases in short-term interest rates, as well as the three rate cuts implemented in 2019 (225 basis points in total) have had a ~~significant~~negative impact on our ~~overall financial performance,~~fiscal year 2020 results, as we have certain assets and liabilities, primarily held in our PCG, ~~and~~ RJ Bank and Other segments, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Fees we earn from third-party banks on client cash balances swept to such banks as part of the RJBDP are also sensitive to changes in interest rates. As the interest rate decreases during our second fiscal quarter occurred in March, we expect that these decreases will have a more significant negative impact on our results for the remainder of fiscal 2020. In addition, during the second fiscal quarter of 2020 we issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.65% senior notes. While this issuance strengthened our liquidity position, it will also increase our interest expense in future periods.

Given the relationship ofbetween our interest-sensitive assets toand liabilities held in each of these segments ~~increases~~and the nature of fees we earn from third-party banks on the RJBDP, decreases in short-term interest rates generally result in an overall ~~increase~~decrease in our net earnings, although the magnitude of the impact to our net interest margin depends on the yields on interest-earning assets relative to the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, including deposit rates paid to clients on their cash balances. Conversely, any ~~decreases~~increases in short-term interest rates and/or ~~increases~~decreases in the deposit rates paid to clients ~~would likely~~generally have a ~~negative~~positive impact on our earnings. Effective May 6, 2019, we modified our methodology for crediting interest on client cash balances, changing the basis from total relationship assets at the firm to total relationship cash balances at the firm. Accordingly, although the crediting schedule was revised upward on that date, we did not experience a corresponding increase in cost to the firm.

Refer to the discussion of the specific components of our net interest income within the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis ~~of Financial Condition~~ - Results of Operations” of our PCG, RJ Bank, and Other segments. Also refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations - Private Client Group - Clients’ domestic cash sweep balances” for further information on the RJBDP.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

~~Quarter ended June 30, 2019 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2018~~

The following ~~table presents~~tables present our consolidated average balances, interest income and expense and the related yields and rates. Average balances are calculated on a daily basis, with the exception of Loans to financial advisors, net and Corporate cash and all other, which are calculated based on the average of the end-of-month balances for each month within the period.

Quarter ended March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2019


	Three months ended June 30,												Three months ended March 31,
	2019						2018						2020						2019
$ in millions	Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost		Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost		Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost		Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost
Interest-earning assets:
Assets segregated pursuant to regulations	$	1,613	$	13	3.22	%	$	2,438	$	14	2.22	%	$	2,820	$	11	1.58	%	$	2,711	$	17	2.47	%
Trading instruments	771		7		3.53	%	760		7		3.68	%	708		7		4.21	%	687		6		3.59	%
Available-for-sale securities	2,901		18		2.41	%	2,534		14		2.11	%	3,443		19		2.28	%	2,876		17		2.43	%
Margin loans	2,531		30		4.74	%	2,688		28		4.23	%	2,367		21		3.55	%	2,599		31		4.76	%
Bank loans, net:
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	8,278		98		4.68	%	7,647		85		4.40	%	8,043		81		3.99	%	8,160		97		4.76	%
CRE construction loans	248		4		5.45	%	182		2		5.23	%	181		2		4.58	%	197		3		5.70	%
CRE loans	3,359		39		4.53	%	3,259		34		4.15	%	3,735		36		3.81	%	3,379		40		4.73	%
Tax-exempt loans	1,291		9		2.79	%	1,191		8		2.58	%	1,212		8		3.36	%	1,280		8		3.34	%
Residential mortgage loans	4,127		34		3.32	%	3,514		27		3.10	%	4,847		38		3.13	%	3,979		34		3.33	%
SBL and other	3,125		36		4.64	%	2,741		29		4.26	%	3,469		31		3.60	%	3,066		37		4.71	%
Loans held for sale	118		1		4.78	%	109		1		4.34	%	142		2		3.85	%	144		1		4.26	%
Total bank loans, net	20,546		221		4.30	%	18,643		186		4.04	%	21,629		198		3.67	%	20,205		220		4.38	%
Loans to financial advisors, net	912		5		2.06	%	895		4		1.70	%	979		5		2.08	%	901		5		2.01	%
Corporate cash and all other	4,107		27		2.72	%	3,518		18		2.05	%	6,321		24		1.40	%	4,897		28		2.38	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	33,381	$	321	3.85	%	$	31,476	$	271	3.44	%	$	38,267	$	285	2.97	%	$	34,876	$	324	3.72	%

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market and NOW accounts													$	22,877	$	6	0.12	%	$	20,751	$	34	0.64	%
Certificates of deposit	$	561	$	4	2.33	%	$	389	$	1	1.64	%	1,094		6		2.03	%	560		3		2.26	%
Savings, money market and NOW accounts	20,842		29		0.56	%	18,423		18		0.37	%
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased	307		2		2.39	%	294		2		2.72	%	222		1		1.93	%	286		2		2.67	%
Brokerage client payables	3,108		5		0.64	%	4,061		4		0.44	%	3,838		3		0.26	%	3,582		5		0.58	%
Other borrowings	897		5		2.20	%	901		6		2.32	%	892		5		2.26	%	967		5		2.35	%
Senior notes payable	1,550		19		4.71	%	1,549		19		4.69	%	1,556		19		4.71	%	1,550		18		4.70	%
Other	772		9		4.93	%	595		4		2.69	%	483		3		3.84	%	762		8		3.62	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	28,037	$	73	1.04	%	$	26,212	$	54	0.82	%	$	30,962	$	43	0.57	%	$	28,458	$	75	1.04	%
Net interest income			$	248					$	217					$	242					$	249

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Six months ended March 31, 2020 compared with the six months ended March 31, 2019



	Six months ended March 31,
	2020						2019
$ in millions	Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost		Average balance		Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/cost
Interest-earning assets:
Assets segregated pursuant to regulations	$	2,578	$	22	1.70	%	$	2,572	$	32	2.45	%
Trading instruments	738		13		3.60	%	705		13		3.73	%
Available-for-sale securities	3,265		37		2.29	%	2,796		33		2.38	%
Margin loans	2,402		48		4.04	%	2,665		63		4.71	%
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	8,061		167		4.07	%	7,959		188		4.67	%
CRE construction loans	207		5		4.75	%	184		5		5.66	%
CRE loans	3,673		73		3.91	%	3,469		81		4.64	%
Tax-exempt loans	1,218		16		3.36	%	1,282		17		3.34	%
Residential mortgage loans	4,743		75		3.16	%	3,934		66		3.32	%
SBL and other	3,403		65		3.78	%	3,085		73		4.65	%
Loans held for sale	151		3		3.97	%	165		4		4.90	%
Total bank loans, net	21,456		404		3.76	%	20,078		434		4.32	%
Loans to financial advisors, net	977		10		2.09	%	908		9		1.97	%
Corporate cash and all other	5,663		48		1.63	%	4,850		56		2.36	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	37,079	$	582	3.14	%	$	34,574	$	640	3.70	%

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market and NOW accounts	$	22,260	$	18	0.16	%	$	20,612	$	67	0.64	%
Certificates of deposit	937		10		2.10	%	510		5		2.13	%
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased	254		2		1.94	%	291		4		2.77	%
Brokerage client payables	3,513		6		0.31	%	3,563		11		0.63	%
Other borrowings	893		10		2.23	%	956		11		2.39	%
Senior notes payable	1,553		37		4.71	%	1,550		36		4.70	%
Other	573		11		3.92	%	760		14		3.41	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	29,983	$	94	0.62	%	$	28,242	$	148	1.05	%
Net interest income			$	488					$	492

Nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances in the preceding ~~table. Payment or income~~tables. Any payments received onfor corporate nonaccrual loans are applied entirely to principal. ~~Income~~Interest income on residential mortgage nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis.

Fee income on bank loans included in interest income ~~for the~~was $5 million and $9 million during three and six months ended ~~June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $3 million~~March 31, 2020, respectively, and $6 million and $11 million during three and six months ended March 31, 2019, respectively.

The yield on tax-exempt loans in the preceding tables is presented on a taxable-equivalent basis utilizing the applicable federal statutory rates for each of the years presented.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

~~Nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2018~~

The following table presents our consolidated average balances, interest income and expense and the related yields and rates. Average balances are calculated on a daily basis, with the exception of Loans to financial advisors, net and Corporate cash and all other, which are calculated based on the average of the end-of-month balances for each month within the period.

Nine months ended June 30,
2019 2018
$ in millions
Average
balance

Interest
inc./exp.

Average
yield/cost

Average
balance

Interest
inc./exp.

Average
yield/cost
Interest-earning assets:
Assets segregated pursuant to regulations $ 1,859
$ 42
3.01 % $ 2,752
$ 40
1.92 %
Trading instruments 727
20
3.66 % 702
17
3.23 %
Available-for-sale securities 2,831
51
2.39 % 2,358
37
2.09 %
Margin loans 2,620
93
4.73 % 2,559
77
4.03 %
Bank loans:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans 8,065
286
4.67 % 7,538
237
4.15 %
CRE construction loans 205
9
5.58 % 166
6
5.03 %
CRE loans 3,433
120
4.60 % 3,160
95
3.97 %
Tax-exempt loans 1,285
26
2.70 % 1,126
22
2.57 %
Residential mortgage loans 3,999
100
3.32 % 3,363
78
3.08 %
SBL and other 3,098
109
4.64 % 2,594
78
3.98 %
Loans held for sale 149
5
4.87 % 123
3
3.83 %
Total bank loans, net 20,234
655
4.32 % 18,070
519
3.85 %
Loans to financial advisors, net 907
14
2.00 % 873
11
1.68 %
Corporate cash and all other 4,674
86
2.50 % 3,882
51
1.75 %
Total interest-earning assets $ 33,852
$ 961
3.79 % $ 31,196
$ 752
3.21 %

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Bank deposits:
Certificates of deposit $ 527
$ 9
2.20 % $ 353
$ 4
1.60 %
Savings, money market and NOW accounts 20,689
96
0.62 % 18,193
35
0.25 %
Trading instruments sold but not yet purchased 297
6
2.63 % 282
5
2.36 %
Brokerage client payables 3,430
16
0.62 % 4,289
10
0.32 %
Other borrowings 942
16
2.32 % 919
17
2.40 %
Senior notes payable 1,550
55
4.70 % 1,549
55
4.69 %
Other 759
23
3.95 % 591
13
2.93 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 28,194
$ 221
1.05 % $ 26,176
$ 139
0.71 %
Net interest income
$ 740

$ 613

Nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances in the preceding table. Payment or income received on corporate nonaccrual loans are applied to principal. Income on residential mortgage nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis.

~~Fee income on bank loans included in interest income for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $14 million and $19 million, respectively.~~

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Results of Operations – Private Client Group

For an overview of our PCG segment operations, as well as a description of the key factors impacting our PCG results of operations, refer to the information presented in “Item 1 - Business” and “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Operating results


	Three months ended June 30,								Nine months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			% change		2019			2018			% change		2020			2019			% change		2020			2019			% change
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees	$	718		$	636		13	%	$	2,063		$	1,843		12	%	$	833		$	638		31	%	$	1,615		$	1,345		20	%
Brokerage revenues:
Mutual and other fund products	147			172			(15	)%	449			535			(16	)%	163			145			12	%	307			302			2	%
Insurance and annuity products	105			97			8	%	308			308			—		99			99			—		200			203			(1	)%
Equities, ETFs and fixed income products	94			106			(11	)%	291			332			(12	)%	122			94			30	%	224			197			14	%
Total brokerage revenues	346			375			(8	)%	1,048			1,175			(11	)%	384			338			14	%	731			702			4	%
Investment banking	10			9			11	%	25			25			—
Interest income	56			50			12	%	170			140			21	%
Account and service fees:
Mutual fund and annuity service fees	85			85			—		250			246			2	%	88			82			7	%	178			165			8	%
RJBDP fees:
Third-party banks	67			70			(4	)%	215			198			9	%	51			80			(36	)%	109			148			(26	)%
RJ Bank	44			24			83	%	127			67			90	%	48			42			14	%	95			83			14	%
Client account and other fees	32			30			7	%	92			85			8	%	35			27			30	%	64			60			7	%
Total account and service fees	228			209			9	%	684			596			15	%	222			231			(4	)%	446			456			(2	)%
Investment banking																	11			8			38	%	22			15			47	%
Interest income																	45			58			(22	)%	94			114			(18	)%
All other	3			8			(63	)%	19			24			(21	)%	7			9			(22	)%	16			16			—
Total revenues	1,361			1,287			6	%	4,009			3,803			5	%	1,502			1,282			17	%	2,924			2,648			10	%
Interest expense	(10		)	(8		)	25	%	(31		)	(19		)	63	%	(7		)	(11		)	(36	)%	(15		)	(21		)	(29	)%
Net revenues	1,351			1,279			6	%	3,978			3,784			5	%	1,495			1,271			18	%	2,909			2,627			11	%
Non-interest expenses:
Financial advisor compensation and benefit costs	805			759			6	%	2,358			2,258			4	%
Administrative compensation and benefit costs	237			214			11	%	700			623			12	%
Financial advisor compensation and benefits																	915			750			22	%	1,772			1,553			14	%
Administrative compensation and benefits																	245			234			5	%	492			463			6	%
Total compensation, commissions and benefits																	1,160			984			18	%	2,264			2,016			12	%
Non-compensation expenses:
Communications and information processing	57			55			4	%	174			164			6	%	62			59			5	%	121			117			3	%
Occupancy and equipment costs	43			38			13	%	122			114			7	%
Occupancy and equipment																	44			41			7	%	88			79			11	%
Business development	37			39			(5	)%	90			84			7	%	24			26			(8	)%	51			53			(4	)%
Professional fees	8			12			(33	)%	24			29			(17	)%	9			7			29	%	17			16			6	%
All other	24			30			(20	)%	74			67			10	%	26			22			18	%	45			50			(10	)%
Total non-compensation expenses																	165			155			6	%	322			315			2	%
Total non-interest expenses	1,211			1,147			6	%	3,542			3,339			6	%	$	1,325		$	1,139		16	%	$	2,586		$	2,331		11	%
Pre-tax income	$	140		$	132		6	%	$	436		$	445		(2	)%	$	170		$	132		29	%	$	323		$	296		9	%
Pre-tax margin on net revenues	10.4		%	10.3		%			11.0		%	11.8		%

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Selected key metrics

PCG client asset balances:


	As of																		As of
$ in billions	June 30, 2019			March 31, 2019			September 30, 2018			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2018			September 30, 2017			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2019			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Assets under administration (“AUA”)	$	787.4		$	760.0		$	755.7		$	719.5		$	694.8		$	659.5		$	734.0		$	855.2		$	798.4		$	760.0		$	690.7		$	755.7
Assets in fee-based accounts ⁽¹⁾	$	398.0		$	378.4		$	366.3		$	343.1		$	325.1		$	294.5		$	383.5		$	444.2		$	409.1		$	378.4		$	338.8		$	366.3
Percent of AUA in fee-based accounts	50.5		%	49.8		%	48.5		%	47.7		%	46.8		%	44.7		%	52.2		%	51.9		%	51.2		%	49.8		%	49.1		%	48.5		%

(1)

A portion of our “Assets in fee-based accounts” is invested in “managed programs” overseen by our Asset Management segment, specifically our Asset Management Services division of RJ&A (“AMS”). These assets are included in our Financial assets under management as disclosed in the “Selected key metrics” section of our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations - Asset Management.”

Fee-based accounts within our PCG segment are comprised of a wide array of products and programs that we offer our clients. The majority of assets in fee-based accounts within our PCG segment are invested in programs for which our financial advisors provide investment advisory services, either on a discretionary or non-discretionary basis. Administrative services for such accounts (e.g., record-keeping) are generally performed by our Asset Management segment and, as a result, a portion of the related revenues is shared with the Asset Management segment.

We also offer our clients fee-based accounts that are invested in “managed programs” overseen by AMS, which is part of our Asset Management segment. Fee-billable assets invested in managed programs are included in both “Assets in fee-based accounts” in the preceding table and “Financial assets under management” in the Asset Management segment. Revenues related to managed programs are shared by our PCG and Asset Management segments. The Asset Management segment receives a higher portion of the revenues related to accounts invested in managed programs, as compared to the portion received for non-managed programs, as it is performing ~~asset~~portfolio management services in addition to administrative services.

WeThe vast majority of the revenues we earn ~~revenues~~ from fee-based accounts ~~for performing investment advisory, asset management and related administrative services for retail clients, which is~~are recorded in “Asset management and related administrative fees” inon our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Fees received from such accounts are based on the value of client assets in fee-based accounts and vary based on the specific account types in which the client participates and the level of assets in the client relationship. As fees for substantially all of such accounts are billed based on balances as of the beginning of the quarter, revenues from fee-based accounts may not be immediately ~~impacted~~affected by changes in asset values, but rather the impacts are seen in the following quarter.

~~PCG assets under administration increased due to~~Despite the net addition of financial advisors ~~and~~in the current quarter, PCG assets under administration decreased due to the decline in equity ~~market appreciation. In addition,~~markets as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. PCG assets in fee-based accounts continued to increase as a percentage of overall PCG assets under administration due to clients’ preference for fee-based alternatives versus ~~traditional~~ transaction-based accounts. As a result of the shift to fee-based accounts over the past several years, a larger portion of our PCG revenues are more directly impacted by market movements. Therefore, further declines in equity markets would negatively affect our PCG revenues.

Financial advisors:


	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018	June 30, 2018	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019	September 30, 2019	March 31, 2019
Employees	3,228	3,167	3,126	3,376	3,331	3,301	3,192
Independent Contractors	4,676	4,646	4,593
Independent contractors				4,772	4,729	4,710	4,670
Total advisors	7,904	7,813	7,719	8,148	8,060	8,011	7,862

The number of financial advisors increased primarily due to continued financial advisor recruiting and high levels of retention. The impact of COVID-19 on future recruiting is uncertain; however, we are likely to see a slowdown in recruiting until travel restrictions and other social distancing measures subside.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Clients’ domestic cash sweep balances:


	As of										As of
$ in millions	June 30, 2019		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		September 30, 2018		June 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		March 31, 2019
RJBDP
RJ Bank	$	21,600	$	21,023	$	21,138	$	19,446	$	19,014	$	28,711	$	21,891	$	21,649	$	21,023
Third-party banks	14,425		14,343		18,320		15,564		16,971		20,379		15,061		14,043		14,343
Subtotal RJBDP	36,025		35,366		39,458		35,010		35,985		49,090		36,952		35,692		35,366
Money market funds	—		4,001		4,436		3,240		2,687		—		—		—		4,001
Client Interest Program (“CIP”)	2,130		2,349		2,935		2,807		2,784		3,782		2,528		2,022		2,349
Total clients’ domestic cash sweep balances	$	38,155	$	41,716	$	46,829	$	41,057	$	41,456	$	52,872	$	39,480	$	37,714	$	41,716



	Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Average yield on RJBDP - third-party banks	1.33	%	2.00	%	1.48	%	1.87	%

A significant portion of our clients’ cash is included in ~~our~~the RJBDP, a multi-bank sweep program in which clients’ cash deposits in their accounts are swept into interest-bearing deposit accounts at RJ Bank and various third-party banks. We earn servicing fees for the administrative services we provide related to our clients’ deposits that are swept to such banks as part of the RJBDP. The amounts from third-party banks are variable in nature and fluctuate based on client cash balances in the program, as well as the level of short-term interest rates ~~relative to~~and the interest paid to clients by the third-party banks on balances in the RJBDP. The “Average yield on RJBDP - third party banks” in the preceding table is computed by dividing annualized RJBDP fees from third-party banks, which are net of the interest expense paid to clients by the third-party banks, by the average daily RJBDP balance at third-party banks. The PCG segment also earns RJBDP servicing fees from RJ Bank, which are based on the number of accounts that are swept to RJ Bank. The fees from RJ Bank are eliminated in consolidation. ~~On October 1, 2018, the per-account servicing fee from RJ Bank was increased to reflect the current cost of administration.~~

~~While~~RJBDP fees from third-party banks and the average yield on RJBDP (third-party banks) were negatively impacted by the significant decrease in short-term interest ~~rates have risen due~~rates. The Federal Reserve decreased its benchmark short-term interest rate twice toward the end of our second fiscal quarter, to a range of 0-0.25%, a total decrease of 150 basis points. These decreases were in addition to the three rate ~~increases by~~cuts implemented in 2019 (225 basis points in total). As the ~~Fed~~interest rate decreases during our second fiscal quarter of 2020 occurred in ~~recent periods, market deposit rates paid~~March, we expect that our average yield on ~~client cash balances have not been impacted~~RJBDP (third-party banks) will decrease to ~~as great a degree, resulting in an increase in RJBDP fees earned from third-party banks.~~approximately 0.30% beginning with our third fiscal quarter. Any additional decreases in short-term interest rates, ~~such as the one announced by the Fed in July 2019,~~ increases in deposit rates paid to clients, and/or a significant decline in our clients’ cash balances ~~would~~will likely have a negative impact on our earnings. ~~The impact on our earnings of any future rate increases will be largely dependent upon the change in the deposit rate paid on client cash balances.~~ Further, PCG segment results are impacted by changes in the allocation of client cash balances in the RJBDP between RJ Bank and third-party banks.

Money market funds were discontinued as a sweep option ~~during the three months ended~~in June ~~30,~~ 2019. Balances in those funds were converted to the RJBDP or reinvested by the client.

The significant increase in clients’ cash balances as of March 31, 2020 was a result of the market volatility and the steep declines in the equity markets during the second fiscal quarter of 2020.

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$1.35~~$1.50 billion increased ~~$72~~$224 million, or 6%18%, ~~over the prior year quarter,~~ and pre-tax income of ~~$140~~$170 million increased $8$38 million, or 6%29%.

Asset management and related administrative fees increased ~~$82~~$195 million, or ~~13%~~31%, ~~resulting from~~due to higher asset balances in fee-based accounts at the ~~16% increase in~~beginning of the quarter. As assets in fee-based accounts asare billed primarily on balances at the beginning of ~~March 31, 2019 compared with March 31, 2018, reflecting successful financial advisor recruiting and retention, as well as equity market appreciation.~~the quarter, the 14% decline in fee-based assets during the current quarter will negatively impact asset management fees in our third fiscal quarter.

Brokerage revenues increased $46 million, or 14%, primarily due to strong client activity driven by market volatility toward the end of the quarter as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Account and service fees decreased $9 million, or 4%, due to the decline in RJBDP fees from third-party banks, primarily driven by lower short-term interest rates compared with the prior-year quarter. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in RJBDP fees from RJ Bank, due to an increase in the number of accounts, and increases in mutual fund service fees and client account and other fees, primarily due to higher average assets and activity during the quarter.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Net interest income decreased $9 million, or 19%, driven by a decrease in interest income from client margin loans and assets segregated pursuant to regulations due to a decline in short-term interest rates. Partially offsetting the decrease in interest income, interest expense also decreased due to the impact of lower deposit rates paid on client cash balances in CIP.

Compensation-related expenses increased $176 million, or 18%, due to higher compensable net revenues, as well as increased staffing levels over the prior-year quarter to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

Non-compensation expenses increased $10 million, or 6%, primarily due to increased costs to support our growth, as well as higher legal reserves.

Six months ended March 31, 2020 compared with the six months ended March 31, 2019

Net revenues of $2.91 billion increased $282 million, or 11%, and pre-tax income of $323 million increased $27 million, or 9%.

Asset management and related administrative fees increased $270 million, or 20%, primarily due to higher assets in fee-based accounts at the beginning of the current-year periods.

Brokerage revenues increased $29 million, or 8%4%, ~~reflecting lower revenues related to mutual funds, largely~~primarily due to strong client activity driven by market volatility toward the end of our second fiscal quarter. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in mutual fund trails, which were impacted by the conversion of client assets into mutual fund share classes which pay lower rates, and the continued shift to fee-based accounts.

~~Total account~~Account and service fees ~~increased $19~~decreased $10 million, or 9%2%, driven by a decline in RJBDP fees from third-party banks, as a result of lower short-term interest rates. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in mutual fund service fees, primarily due to higher assets, and higher RJBDP fees from RJ Bank due to an increase in the ~~per-account servicing fee and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the~~ number of accounts ~~partially due to the discontinuation of the money market funds as a sweep option discussed above.~~at RJ Bank.

Net interest income ~~increased $4~~decreased $14 million, or ~~10%~~15%, driven by ~~an increase~~a decrease in interest income from assets segregated pursuant to regulations, due a decline in short-term interest rates, and a decrease in interest income from client margin loans, due to the ~~increase~~decline in short-term interest ~~rates. Offsetting~~rates and a decline in average balances. Partially offsetting the ~~increase~~decrease in interest income, interest expense also ~~increased~~decreased due to the impact of ~~higher interest~~lower deposit rates paid on client cash balances in CIP.

~~Non-interest~~Compensation-related expenses increased ~~$64~~$248 million, or 6%12%, ~~including an increase in compensation-related expenses~~ due to higher compensable net revenues, as well as increased staffing levels in the current year to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements.

~~Nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2018~~

~~Net revenues of $3.98 billion~~Non-compensation expenses increased ~~$194~~$7 million, or ~~5%, while pre-tax income of $436 million decreased $9 million, or~~ 2%.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

~~Asset management and related administrative fees increased $220 million, or 12%~~, primarily due to ~~higher assets in fee-based accounts compared with the prior year period, reflecting successful financial advisor recruiting and retention, as well as equity market appreciation.~~

Brokerage revenues declined $127 million, or 11%, primarily as a result of the decline in mutual fund trails, which were negatively impacted by the decline in the equity markets during the first fiscal quarter of 2019 and the continued shift to fee-based accounts.

~~Total account and service fees~~ increased $88 million, or 15%, primarily due to higher RJBDP fees from RJ Bank due to an increase in the per-account servicing fee and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the number of accounts. RJBDP fees from third-party banks also increased, driven by higher short-term interest rates.

Net interest income increased $18 million, or 15%, driven by an increase in interest income from client margin loans due to the increase in short-term interest rates and, to a lesser extent, higher average balances. Offsetting the increase in interest income, interest expense also increased due to the impact of higher interest rates paid on client cash balances in CIP.

~~Non-interest expenses increased $203 million, or 6%, led by an increase in compensation-related expenses due to higher net revenues, as well as increased staffing levels~~costs to support our continued growth and regulatory compliance requirements. Communications and information processing expense increased as a result of our continued investment in technology infrastructure to support our growth.

~~Occupancy and business development expenses also increased and were driven by branch expansion in our employee affiliation option as well as financial advisor~~ growth.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Results of Operations – Capital Markets

For an overview of our Capital Markets segment operations, as well as a description of the key factors impacting our Capital Markets results of operations, refer to the information presented in “Item 1 - Business” and “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Operating results


	Three months ended June 30,								Nine months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			% change		2019			2018			% change		2020			2019			% change		2020			2019			% change
Revenues:
Brokerage revenues:
Fixed income																	$	90		$	71		27	%	$	171		$	128		34	%
Equity	$	31		$	41		(24	)%	$	105		$	123		(15	)%	40			32			25	%	74			74			—
Fixed income	73			53			38	%	201			190			6	%
Total brokerage revenues	104			94			11	%	306			313			(2	)%	130			103			26	%	245			202			21	%
Investment banking:
Merger & acquisition and advisory																	72			121			(40	)%	132			206			(36	)%
Equity underwriting	27			30			(10	)%	72			66			9	%	43			18			139	%	82			45			82	%
Merger & acquisition and advisory	78			85			(8	)%	279			200			40	%
Fixed income investment banking	24			21			14	%	63			58			9	%
Debt underwriting																	22			17			29	%	53			34			56	%
Total investment banking	129			136			(5	)%	414			324			28	%	137			156			(12	)%	267			285			(6	)%
Interest income	10			9			11	%	29			24			21	%	10			9			11	%	18			19			(5	)%
Tax credit fund revenues	16			12			33	%	49			40			23	%	12			14			(14	)%	30			33			(9	)%
All other	2			1			100	%	9			10			(10	)%	7			3			133	%	10			7			43	%
Total revenues	261			252			4	%	807			711			14	%	296			285			4	%	570			546			4	%
Interest expense	(10		)	(9		)	11	%	(26		)	(21		)	24	%	(6		)	(8		)	(25	)%	(12		)	(16		)	(25	)%
Net revenues	251			243			3	%	781			690			13	%	290			277			5	%	558			530			5	%
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation, commissions and benefits	160			161			(1	)%	486			471			3	%	184			168			10	%	350			326			7	%
Non-compensation expenses:
Communications and information processing	18			18			—		56			55			2	%	20			19			5	%	39			38			3	%
Occupancy and equipment costs	8			8			—		26			25			4	%
Occupancy and equipment																	9			9			—		18			18			—
Business development	12			13			(8	)%	37			35			6	%	15			13			15	%	31			25			24	%
Professional fees	11			3			267	%	31			8			288	%	13			10			30	%	23			20			15	%
Acquisition and disposition-related expenses	—			—			—		15			—			NM		—			—			—		—			15			(100	)%
All other	20			22			(9	)%	71			62			15	%	21			17			24	%	40			35			14	%
Total non-compensation expenses																	78			68			15	%	151			151			—
Total non-interest expenses	229			225			2	%	722			656			10	%	262			236			11	%	501			477			5	%
Income before taxes and including noncontrolling interests	22			18			22	%	59			34			74	%
Noncontrolling interests	(2		)	(4		)	50	%	(18		)	(9		)	(100	)%
Pre-tax income excluding noncontrolling interests	$	24		$	22		9	%	$	77		$	43		79	%
Pre-tax margin on net revenues	9.6		%	9.1		%			9.9		%	6.2		%
Pre-tax income																	$	28		$	41		(32	)%	$	57		$	53		8	%

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$251~~$290 million increased $8$13 million, or 3%5%, and pre-tax income of ~~$24~~$28 million ~~increased $2~~decreased $13 million, or 9%32%.

~~Total brokerage~~Brokerage revenues increased ~~$10~~$27 million, or ~~11%~~26%, due to an increase in both fixed income ~~brokerage revenues, which were partially offset by a decline in~~and equity brokerage revenues. ~~Fixed income~~The increase in brokerage revenues ~~improved due to increased~~reflected an increase in client activity during the ~~current year quarter. Equity brokerage revenues reflected~~current-year quarter resulting from market volatility, partially offset by losses of approximately $6 million on our trading inventory, both due to the ~~impact of lower client activity during~~COVID-19 pandemic. We reduced our trading inventory toward the ~~current year quarter and included the impact~~end of the ~~sale of~~quarter to reduce our ~~operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities.~~risk.

Investment banking revenues decreased $7$19 million, or 5%12%, ~~from~~due to a decrease in the number of completed merger & acquisition transactions compared with a strong ~~prior year~~prior-year quarter. ~~The decline~~Partially offsetting the decrease in mergers & acquisitions was an increase in equity underwriting revenues ~~was~~primarily due to ~~decreased~~an increase in activity compared with a difficult prior-year quarter, which was negatively impacted by the U.S. government shutdown during that period. While investment banking results during the second fiscal quarter were solid, merger & acquisition and ~~advisory activity. Non-interest~~underwriting activity may be negatively impacted in future quarters if market uncertainty continues.

Compensation-related expenses increased $4$16 million, or 2%10%, ~~reflecting increases in professional fees. Professional fees increased largely~~primarily due to ~~new accounting guidance we adopted effective October 1, 2018, which changed~~ the ~~presentation~~mix of ~~certain costs related to investment banking transactions from a net presentation to a gross presentation. The current year quarter included this change,~~revenues, as revenues with ~~approximately $6 million of these transaction-related expenses. See Notes 2 and~~higher payout percentages increased, while revenues with lower payout percentages declined.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

~~16 of~~Non-compensation expenses increased $10 million, or 15%, reflecting increases in professional fees and business development costs, primarily related to the ~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for information on the adoption of this new accounting guidance.~~increase in underwriting revenues, as well as an increase in other expenses.

~~Nine~~Six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$781~~$558 million increased ~~$91~~$28 million, or ~~13%~~5%, and pre-tax income of ~~$77~~$57 million increased ~~$34~~$4 million, or ~~79%~~8%.

~~Total brokerage~~Brokerage revenues ~~decreased $7~~increased $43 million, or 2%21%, ~~with a decline in equity brokerage revenues partially offset by~~due to an increase in fixed income brokerage revenues. ~~Equity brokerage revenues continue to be challenged by the industry trend toward the separate payment for research and execution services and the shift from high to low-touch execution services.~~ The increase in fixed income brokerage revenues was primarily due to an increase in client activity during the ~~current year period. Our Canadian Capital Markets business continues to be~~current-year period, largely a result of higher market volatility, particularly toward the end of our second fiscal quarter. Equity brokerage revenues were challenged ~~by the difficult environment~~earlier in the year, but increased during our second fiscal quarter due to strong client activity driven by market ~~sectors in which we participate in Canada.~~ volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Investment banking revenues ~~increased $90~~decreased $18 million, or ~~28%, led by increased~~6% due to a significant decline in merger & acquisition activity compared with a strong first half of fiscal 2019. Offsetting the decrease was an increase in both equity underwriting and ~~advisory activity.~~debt underwriting net revenues, with an increase in the number of deals, as well as larger individual transactions.

~~Non-interest~~Compensation-related expenses increased ~~$66~~$24 million, or ~~10%~~7%, primarily due to the increase in revenues.

Non-compensation expenses were unchanged compared with the ~~prior year period. The current year~~prior-year period, ~~was negatively impacted~~as increases in business development, professional fees and other expenses were offset by a loss in the prior-year period of $15 million ~~loss~~ associated with the sale of our operations related to research, sales and trading of European equities. Compensation-related expenses increased primarily attributable to the increase in investment banking revenues. Professional fees increased $23 million largely due to the aforementioned new accounting guidance we adopted effective October 1, 2018. The current year period included approximately $18 million of these transaction-related expenses. Other expenses increased $9 million primarily due to losses related to a consolidated tax credit fund, nearly all of which were offset in noncontrolling interests.

Results of Operations – Asset Management

For an overview of our Asset Management segment operations as well as a description of the key factors impacting our Asset Management results of operations, refer to the information presented in “Item 1 - Business” and “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Operating results

Three months ended June 30, Nine months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2019 2018 % change 2019 2018 % change
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees:
Managed programs $ 120
$ 118
2 % $ 346
$ 336
3 %
Administration and other 45
39
15 % 129
114
13 %
Total asset management and related administrative fees 165
157
5 % 475
450
6 %
Account and service fees 8
9
(11 )% 27
22
23 %
All other 4
2
100 % 11
10
10 %
Net revenues 177
168
5 % 513
482
6 %
Non-interest expenses:

Compensation and benefits 47
45
4 % 135
127
6 %
Communications and information processing 12
10
20 % 33
29
14 %
Investment sub-advisory fees 23
22
5 % 68
66
3 %
All other 29
31
(6 )% 90
82
10 %
Total non-interest expenses 111
108
3 % 326
304
7 %
Income before taxes and including noncontrolling interests 66
60
10 % 187
178
5 %
Noncontrolling interests 1
2
(50 )% 3
7
(57 )%
Pre-tax income excluding noncontrolling interests $ 65
$ 58
12 % $ 184
$ 171
8 %
Pre-tax margin on net revenues 36.7 % 34.5 % 35.9 % 35.5 %

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~



	Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2020		2019		% change		2020		2019		% change
Revenues:
Asset management and related administrative fees:
Managed programs	$	124	$	109	14	%	$	249	$	226	10	%
Administration and other	53		40		33	%	104		84		24	%
Total asset management and related administrative fees	177		149		19	%	353		310		14	%
Account and service fees	4		10		(60	)%	9		19		(53	)%
All other	3		3		—		6		7		(14	)%
Net revenues	184		162		14	%	368		336		10	%
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation, commissions and benefits	45		45		—		90		88		2	%
Non-compensation expenses:
Communications and information processing	12		10		20	%	23		21		10	%
Investment sub-advisory fees	26		21		24	%	51		45		13	%
All other	28		31		(10	)%	58		63		(8	)%
Total non-compensation expenses	66		62		6	%	132		129		2	%
Total non-interest expenses	111		107		4	%	222		217		2	%
Pre-tax income	$	73	$	55	33	%	$	146	$	119	23	%

Selected key metrics

Managed programs

~~We earn asset management and administration fees for performing asset management, investment advisory and related administrative services for retail and institutional clients.~~ Management fees recorded in our Asset Management segment are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of our fee-billable financial assets under management (“AUM”). These AUM include the portion of fee-based AUA in our PCG segment that ~~are~~is invested in programs ~~managed~~overseen by our Asset Management segment (included in the ~~AMS~~“AMS” line of the following table), as well as ~~certain~~ retail accounts

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

managed on behalf of third-party institutions, institutional accounts orand proprietary mutual funds that we manage ~~(included~~(collectively included in the ~~Carillon Tower Advisers and affiliates~~ “Carillon Tower Advisers” line of the following table).

Revenues related to fee-based AUA in our PCG segment are shared by the PCG and Asset Management segments, the amount of which depends on whether clients are invested in assets that are in managed programs overseen by our Asset Management segment and the administrative services provided (see our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations - Private Client Group” for more information). Our ~~financial assets under management~~AUM in AMS are impacted by market fluctuations and net inflows or outflows of assets, including transfers between fee-based accounts and ~~traditional~~ transaction-based accounts within our PCG segment.

Revenues earned by Carillon Tower Advisers for retail accounts managed on behalf of third-party institutions, institutional accounts orand our proprietary mutual funds are recorded entirely in the Asset Management segment. Our ~~financial assets under management~~AUM in Carillon Tower Advisers are impacted by market ~~fluctuations~~and investment performance and net inflows or outflows of assets.

Fees are generally collected ~~quarterly and~~quarterly. Approximately 65% of these fees are based on balances as of the beginning of the quarter, approximately 10% are based on balances as of the end of the quarter, orand approximately 25% are based on average daily ~~balances.~~balances throughout the quarter.

Financial assets under management:


$ in millions	June 30, 2019			March 31, 2019			September 30, 2018			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2018			September 30, 2017			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2019			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
AMS ⁽¹⁾	$	89,106		$	84,906		$	83,289		$	78,897		$	76,091		$	69,962		$	83,971		$	98,648		$	91,802		$	84,906		$	76,235		$	83,289
Carillon Tower Advisers	60,737			59,852			63,330			62,210			61,751			31,831			51,674			60,637			58,521			59,852			55,925			63,330
Subtotal financial assets under management	149,843			144,758			146,619			141,107			137,842			101,793			135,645			159,285			150,323			144,758			132,160			146,619
Less: Assets managed for affiliated entities	(6,712		)	(6,220		)	(5,702		)	(5,573		)	(5,538		)	(5,397		)	(7,456		)	(7,633		)	(7,221		)	(6,220		)	(5,653		)	(5,702		)
Total financial assets under management	$	143,131		$	138,538		$	140,917		$	135,534		$	132,304		$	96,396		$	128,189		$	151,652		$	143,102		$	138,538		$	126,507		$	140,917


(1)	Represents the portion of our PCG segment fee-based AUA (as disclosed in “Assets in fee-based accounts” in the “Selected key metrics - PCG client asset balances” section of our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations - Private Client Group”) that is invested in managed programs overseen by the Asset Management segment.

Activity (including activity in assets managed for affiliated entities):


	Three months ended June 30,						Nine months ended June 30,					Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			2019			2018		2020			2019			2020			2019
Financial assets under management at beginning of period	$	144,758		$	137,842		$	146,619		$	101,793	$	159,285		$	132,160		$	150,323		$	146,619
Carillon Tower Advisers:
Scout Group acquisition	—			—			—			27,087
Other - net inflows/(outflows)	(910		)	(544		)	(3,584		)	862
Carillon Tower Advisers - net outflows												(2,016		)	(1,094		)	(2,388		)	(2,674		)
AMS - net inflows	1,751			2,348			4,138			7,283		1,189			1,869			3,272			2,387
Net market appreciation/(depreciation) in asset values	4,244			1,461			2,670			4,082		(22,813		)	11,823			(15,562		)	(1,574		)
Financial assets under management at end of period	$	149,843		$	141,107		$	149,843		$	141,107	$	135,645		$	144,758		$	135,645		$	144,758

AMS division of RJ&A

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations - Private Client Group” for further information about our retail client assets, including those fee-based assets invested in programs managed by AMS.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Carillon Tower Advisers

Assets managed by Carillon Tower Advisers include assets managed by its subsidiaries and ~~affiliates~~affiliates: Eagle Asset Management, ClariVest Asset Management, Cougar Global Investments and the Scout Group. The following table presents Carillon Tower Advisers’ AUM by objective, excluding ~~non-discretionary asset-based programs,~~assets for which it does not exercise discretion, as well as the approximate average client fee rate earned on such assets for the most recent fiscal year period.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		Average fee rate	March 31, 2020		Average fee rate
Equity	$	29,874	0.51%	$	21,518	0.54%
Fixed income	26,335		0.18%	25,641		0.18%
Balanced	4,528		0.37%	4,515		0.37%
Total financial assets under management	$	60,737	0.36%	$	51,674	0.35%

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Non-discretionary asset-based programs



$ in billions	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		September 30, 2018
Total assets	$	217.3	$	251.3	$	229.7	$	207.0	$	184.3	$	200.1

~~Assets~~The preceding table includes assets held in certain non-discretionary asset-based programs for which the Asset Management segment does not exercise discretion but provides administrative support (including for affiliated entities) totaled $220.1 billion, $207.0 billion, $200.1 billion, $186.4 billion and $157.0 billion as of June 30, 2019, March 31, 2019, September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, and September 30, 2017, respectively.. The increase in assets over the ~~prior year~~prior-year level was primarily due to clients moving to fee-based accounts from ~~traditional~~ transaction-based accounts and successful financial advisor ~~recruiting and market appreciation. Administrative~~recruiting. The decrease in assets during our second fiscal quarter was due to the decline in equity markets toward the end of our second fiscal quarter due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As administrative fees associated with these programs are predominantly ~~calculated~~ based on balances at the beginning of the ~~quarter.~~quarter, the 14% decline in assets during the quarter will negatively impact our third fiscal quarter revenues.

RJ Trust



$ in billions	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		September 30, 2018
Total assets	$	6.4	$	7.2	$	6.6	$	6.2	$	5.7	$	6.1

~~Assets~~The preceding table includes assets held in asset-based programs in RJ Trust (including those managed for affiliated entities) ~~totaled $6.4 billion, $6.2 billion, $6.1 billion, $5.8 billion and $5.5 billion as of June 30, 2019, March 31, 2019, September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively.~~.

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$177~~$184 million increased $9$22 million, or 5%14%, and pre-tax income of ~~$65~~$73 million increased $7$18 million, or ~~12%~~33%.

~~Total asset~~Asset management and related administrative fee revenues increased $8$28 million, or 5%19%, driven by ~~an increase in administrative fees due to the aforementioned increase in~~higher average financial assets ~~held~~under management and higher beginning assets in non-discretionary asset-based programs. Although financial assets under management and assets in non-discretionary asset-based programs at the end of the quarter were lower than the end of the prior-year quarter, revenues increased as the majority of assets in these programs are billed based on balances as of the beginning of the quarter. The decline in these assets as of March 31, 2020, primarily due to the negative market impact of the COVID-19 pandemic toward the end of the quarter, will negatively affect our third fiscal quarter results.

~~Non-interest~~Non-compensation expenses increased $4 million, or 6%, due to an increase in investment sub-advisory fees resulting from an increase in assets under management in sub-advised programs.

Six months ended March 31, 2020 compared with the six months ended March 31, 2019

Net revenues of $368 million increased $32 million, or 10%, and pre-tax income of $146 million increased $27 million, or 23%.

Asset management and related administrative fees increased $43 million, or 14%, driven by higher average financial assets under management and higher beginning assets in non-discretionary asset-based programs. Although financial assets under management and assets in non-discretionary asset-based programs at the end of the period were lower than the end of the prior-year period, revenues increased as the majority of assets in these programs are billed based on balances as of the beginning of each quarter.

Non-compensation expenses increased $3 million, or ~~3%, as a result of an increase in compensation and benefits expense as well as communication and information processing expenses, primarily to support the growth of the business.~~

~~Nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2018~~

~~Net revenues of $513 million increased $31 million, or 6%, and pre-tax income of $184 million increased $13 million, or 8%.~~

Total asset management and related administrative fee revenues increased $25 million, or 6%, driven by an increase in net revenues from both managed and non-discretionary asset-based accounts. Managed programs increased due to the current year period including a full period of results for the Scout Group, which was acquired in November 2017. Administrative fees increased over the prior year period due to the aforementioned increase in assets held in non-discretionary asset-based programs.

~~Non-interest expenses increased $22 million, or 7%~~2%, primarily ~~the result of an increase in compensation and benefits expense and other expenses. Compensation and benefits expense increased primarily~~ due ~~to the Scout Group acquisition in November 2017, in addition~~ to an increase in ~~personnel over the prior year period to support the growth of the business. The~~investment sub-advisory fees resulting from an increase in other expense was primarily due to certain incremental costs associated with the Scout Group acquisition, including platform fees related to the new funds offered and the amortization of certain intangible assets ~~arising from the acquisition.~~under management in sub-advised programs.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Results of Operations – RJ Bank

For an overview of our RJ Bank segment operations, as well as a description of the key factors impacting our RJ Bank results of operations, refer to the information presented in “Item 1 - Business” and “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Operating results


	Three months ended June 30,								Nine months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			% change		2019			2018			% change		2020			2019			% change		2020			2019			% change
Revenues:
Interest income	$	246		$	205		20	%	$	732		$	571		28	%	$	223		$	247		(10	)%	$	454		$	486		(7	)%
Interest expense	(38		)	(25		)	52	%	(122		)	(56		)	118	%	(18		)	(42		)	(57	)%	(39		)	(84		)	(54	)%
Net interest income	208			180			16	%	610			515			18	%	205			205			—		415			402			3	%
All other	7			8			(13	)%	20			17			18	%	5			7			(29	)%	11			13			(15	)%
Net revenues	215			188			14	%	630			532			18	%	210			212			(1	)%	426			415			3	%
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits	13			12			8	%	36			31			16	%	13			12			8	%	25			23			9	%
Non-compensation expenses:
Loan loss provision/(benefit)	(5		)	5			(200	)%	16			14			14	%	109			5			2,080	%	107			21			410	%
RJBDP fees to PCG	44			24			83	%	127			67			90	%	48			42			14	%	95			83			14	%
All other	25			17			47	%	67			58			16	%	26			17			53	%	50			42			19	%
Total non-compensation expenses																	183			64			186	%	252			146			73	%
Total non-interest expenses	77			58			33	%	246			170			45	%	196			76			158	%	277			169			64	%
Pre-tax income	$	138		$	130		6	%	$	384		$	362		6	%	$	14		$	136		(90	)%	$	149		$	246		(39	)%
Pre-tax margin on net revenues	64.2		%	69.1		%			61.0		%	68.0		%

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$215~~$210 million ~~increased $27~~decreased $2 million, or ~~14%~~1%, and pre-tax income of ~~$138~~$14 million ~~increased $8~~decreased $122 million, or ~~6%.~~90%, primarily due to a higher bank loan loss provision.

Net interest income ~~increased $28 million, or 16%, due to a $2.64 billion~~was flat as the impacts of higher interest-earning banking assets offset the negative impact from lower short-term interest rates. The increase in average interest-earning banking assets ~~primarily reflecting a $1.90 billion increase~~was driven by growth in average loans of $1.42 billion, average cash balances of $661 million, and ~~an increase in net interest margin.~~average available-for-sale portfolio of $567 million. The net interest margin ~~increased~~decreased to ~~3.37%~~3.02% from ~~3.30%~~3.35% due to ~~an increase~~the decline in ~~average asset yields, as a result of both higher~~ short-term interest rates. As the most recent rate cuts implemented by the Federal Reserve did not occur until late in our second fiscal quarter, we expect this decline to have a more significant impact on our net interest income and net interest margin in the third fiscal quarter. In addition, most of RJ Bank’s assets are priced based on LIBOR. Based on current LIBOR rates, ~~and higher average balances, partially offset by an increase in total cost of funds. The increase in total cost of funds resulted from higher deposit costs primarily due~~we expect our net interest margin to ~~increased interest rates. Corresponding~~decline to approximately 2.5% over the ~~increase in average interest-earning banking assets, average interest-bearing banking liabilities increased $2.48 billion.~~next two quarters.

The loan loss ~~benefit of~~provision was $109 million compared to $5 million in the ~~current year~~prior-year quarter. The increase in the provision in the current-year quarter was ~~attributable~~in response to the ~~substantial decrease~~rapid and widespread economic deterioration caused by COVID-19. Continued deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses in ~~total criticized loans~~the future or to experience loan losses in excess of current reserves.

Compensation and benefits expenses increased $1 million, or 8%, due increased staffing levels to ~~several payoffs during the current year quarter.~~support our continued growth.

~~Non-interest~~

Non-compensation expenses (excluding the provision for loan losses) increased ~~$29~~$15 million. The increase in non-compensation expenses included a $6 million, or ~~55%, including a $20 million, or 83%~~14%, increase in fees for RJBDP paid to PCG, primarily driven by an increase in the ~~per-account servicing fee effective October 1, 2018~~number of accounts, and an increase in FDIC insurance premiums due to the increase in ~~number of accounts. In addition, there were increases~~deposit balances. RJBDP fees paid to PCG are eliminated in the reserves on unfunded loan commitments compared with the prior year quarter. The current year quarter included an increase in losses associated with certain of RJ Bank’s LIHTC investments. These LIHTC investments produce certain operating losses that impact non-interest expenses, but create incremental benefits in excess of such losses in the form of tax credits which benefit our consolidated income tax expense and liabilities.

consolidation.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The following table presents average balances, interest income and expense, the related yields and rates, and interest spreads and margins for RJ Bank.


	Three months ended June 30,														Three months ended March 31,
	2019							2018							2020							2019
$ in millions	Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost
Interest-earning banking assets:
Cash	$	998		$	5	2.36	%	$	660		$	4	1.79	%	$	2,052		$	5	0.89	%	$	1,391		$	9	2.40	%
Available-for-sale securities	2,901			18		2.41	%	2,534			14		2.11	%	3,443			19		2.28	%	2,876			17		2.43	%
Bank loans, net of unearned income:
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	8,278			98		4.68	%	7,647			85		4.40	%	8,043			81		3.99	%	8,160			97		4.76	%
CRE construction loans	248			4		5.45	%	182			2		5.23	%	181			2		4.58	%	197			3		5.70	%
CRE loans	3,359			39		4.53	%	3,259			34		4.15	%	3,735			36		3.81	%	3,379			40		4.73	%
Tax-exempt loans	1,291			9		3.35	%	1,191			8		3.41	%	1,212			8		3.36	%	1,280			8		3.34	%
Residential mortgage loans	4,127			34		3.32	%	3,514			27		3.10	%	4,847			38		3.13	%	3,979			34		3.33	%
SBL and other	3,125			36		4.64	%	2,741			29		4.26	%	3,469			31		3.60	%	3,066			37		4.71	%
Loans held for sale	118			1		4.78	%	109			1		4.34	%	142			2		3.85	%	144			1		4.26	%
Total bank loans, net	20,546			221		4.30	%	18,643			186		4.04	%	21,629			198		3.67	%	20,205			220		4.38	%
FHLB stock, Federal Reserve Bank stock and other	168			2		4.42	%	133			1		4.53	%
FHLB stock, FRB stock and other															230			1		2.48	%	153			1		4.44	%
Total interest-earning banking assets	24,613			$	246	4.00	%	21,970			$	205	3.75	%	27,354			$	223	3.28	%	24,625			$	247	4.04	%
Non-interest-earning banking assets:
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities	(6		)					(57		)
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities															53							(33		)
Allowance for loan losses	(218		)					(195		)					(217		)					(220		)
Other assets	390							367							399							400
Total non-interest-earning banking assets	166							115							235							147
Total banking assets	$	24,779						$	22,085						$	27,589						$	24,772
Interest-bearing banking liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market and NOW accounts															$	23,045		$	7	0.13	%	$	20,923		$	35	0.66	%
Certificates of deposit	$	561		$	4	2.33	%	$	389		$	1	1.64	%	1,094			6		2.03	%	560			3		2.26	%
Savings, money market and NOW accounts	20,989			30		0.59	%	18,634			18		0.39	%
FHLB advances and other	895			4		2.08	%	939			6		2.09	%	893			5		2.24	%	914			4		2.17	%
Total interest-bearing banking liabilities	22,445			$	38	0.69	%	19,962			$	25	0.49	%	25,032			$	18	0.29	%	22,397			$	42	0.77	%
Non-interest-bearing banking liabilities	156							183							242							258
Total banking liabilities	22,601							20,145							25,274							22,655
Total banking shareholder’s equity	2,178							1,940							2,315							2,117
Total banking liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	24,779						$	22,085						$	27,589						$	24,772
Excess of interest-earning banking assets over interest-bearing banking liabilities/net interest income	$	2,168		$	208			$	2,008		$	180			$	2,322		$	205			$	2,228		$	205
Bank net interest:
Spread						3.31	%						3.26	%						2.99	%						3.27	%
Margin (net yield on interest-earning banking assets)						3.37	%						3.30	%						3.02	%						3.35	%
Ratio of interest-earning banking assets to interest-bearing banking liabilities						109.66	%						110.06	%						109.28	%						109.95	%

Nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances in the preceding table. ~~Payment or income~~Any payments received onfor corporate nonaccrual loans are applied entirely to principal. ~~Income~~Interest income on residential mortgage nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis.

Fee income on bank loans included in interest income for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ was $3$5 million and $6 million, respectively.

The yield on tax-exempt loans in the preceding table is presented on a tax-equivalent basis utilizing the applicable federal statutory tax rates for each of the three months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average interest rates. The following table shows the effect that these factors had on the interest earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest incurred on our interest-bearing liabilities. The effect of changes in volume is determined by multiplying the change in volume by the previous period’s average yield/cost. Similarly, the effect of rate changes is calculated by multiplying the change in average yield/cost by the previous year’s volume. Changes attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately.


	Three months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,
	2019 compared to 2018								2020 compared to 2019
	Increase/(decrease) due to								Increase/(decrease) due to
$ in millions	Volume			Rate		Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest revenue:
Interest income:
Interest-earning banking assets:
Cash	$	1		$	—	$	1		$	4		$	(8	)	$	(4	)
Available-for-sale securities	2			2		4			3			(1		)	2
Bank loans, net of unearned income:
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	7			6		13			(1		)	(15		)	(16		)
CRE construction loans	2			—		2			—			(1		)	(1		)
CRE loans	1			4		5			4			(8		)	(4		)
Tax-exempt loans	1			—		1
Residential mortgage loans	5			2		7			6			(2		)	4
SBL and other	4			3		7			6			(12		)	(6		)
Loans held for sale									1			—			1
Total bank loans, net	20			15		35			16			(38		)	(22		)
FHLB stock, Federal Reserve Bank stock, and other	1			—		1
Total interest-earning banking assets	24			17		41			23			(47		)	(24		)
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing banking liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts									4			(32		)	(28		)
Certificates of deposit	1			2		3			4			(1		)	3
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts	2			10		12
FHLB advances and other	(2		)	—		(2		)	(1		)	2			1
Total interest-bearing banking liabilities	1			12		13			7			(31		)	(24		)
Change in net interest income	$	23		$	5	$	28		$	16		$	(16	)	$	—

~~Nine~~Six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Net revenues of ~~$630~~$426 million increased ~~$98~~$11 million, or ~~18%~~3%, and pre-tax income of ~~$384~~$149 million ~~increased $22~~decreased $97 million, or 6%39%.

Net interest income increased ~~$95~~$13 million, or ~~18%~~3%, ~~due to a $2.85 billion increase in average~~as higher interest-earning banking assets ~~as well as an increase in net~~offset the negative impact from lower short-term interest ~~margin.~~rates. The increase in average interest-earning banking assets was primarily driven by growth in average loans of ~~$2.16~~$1.38 billion and a ~~$473~~$469 million increase in our average available-for-sale securities portfolio. The net interest margin ~~increased~~decreased to ~~3.32%~~3.12% from 3.20% due to an increase in asset yields, a result of higher short-term interest rates and average balances, partially offset by an increase in total cost of funds. The increase in total cost of funds resulted from higher deposit costs due to increased interest rates. Corresponding to the increase in average interest-earning banking assets, average interest-bearing banking liabilities increased $2.62 billion.3.30%.

The loan loss provision was $107 million, compared to $21 million in the prior-year period. The increase in the provision in the current-year period was primarily attributable to the economic impacts of ~~$16 million was~~COVID-19 during the second fiscal quarter.

Compensation and benefits expenses increased $2 million ~~higher than the prior year period and was largely attributable~~due increased staffing levels to ~~provisions related to certain credits downgraded during the current year period, partially offset by lower reserve rates on pass-rated loans.~~support our continued growth.

~~Non-interest~~

Non-compensation expenses (excluding the provision for loan losses) increased ~~$74~~$20 million, including a $12 million, or ~~47%, including a $60 million, or 90%~~14%, increase in fees for RJBDP paid to PCG, primarily driven by an increase in the ~~per-account servicing fee effective October 1, 2018 and the increase in the~~ number of accounts. ~~In addition, compensation and benefits expenses increased due increased staffing levels to support our continued growth. The current year period included an increase~~These fees are eliminated in losses associated with certain of RJ Bank’s LIHTC investments. These LIHTC investments produce certain operating losses that impact non-interest expenses, but create incremental benefits in excess of such losses in the form of tax credits which benefit our consolidated income tax expense and liabilities.

consolidation.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The following table presents average balances, interest income and expense, the related yields and rates, and interest spreads and margins for RJ Bank.


	Nine months ended June 30,														Six months ended March 31,
	2019							2018							2020							2019
$ in millions	Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost		Average balance			Interest inc./exp.		Average yield/ cost
Interest-earning banking assets:
Cash	$	1,231		$	21	2.33	%	$	1,040		$	12	1.48	%	$	1,624		$	10	1.17	%	$	1,347		$	16	2.32	%
Available-for-sale securities	2,831			51		2.39	%	2,358			36		2.00	%	3,265			37		2.29	%	2,796			33		2.38	%
Bank loans, net of unearned income:
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	8,065			286		4.67	%	7,538			237		4.15	%	8,061			167		4.07	%	7,959			188		4.67	%
CRE construction loans	205			9		5.58	%	166			6		5.03	%	207			5		4.75	%	184			5		5.66	%
CRE loans	3,433			120		4.60	%	3,160			95		3.97	%	3,673			73		3.91	%	3,469			81		4.64	%
Tax-exempt loans	1,285			26		3.34	%	1,126			22		3.41	%	1,218			16		3.36	%	1,282			17		3.34	%
Residential mortgage loans	3,999			100		3.32	%	3,363			78		3.08	%	4,743			75		3.16	%	3,934			66		3.32	%
SBL and other	3,098			109		4.64	%	2,594			78		3.98	%	3,403			65		3.78	%	3,085			73		4.65	%
Loans held for sale	149			5		4.87	%	123			3		3.83	%	151			3		3.97	%	165			4		4.90	%
Total bank loans, net	20,234			655		4.32	%	18,070			519		3.85	%	21,456			404		3.76	%	20,078			434		4.32	%
FHLB stock, Federal Reserve Bank stock and other	163			5		4.27	%	138			4		4.13	%
FHLB stock, FRB stock and other															222			3		2.74	%	161			3		4.19	%
Total interest-earning banking assets	24,459			$	732	3.99	%	21,606			$	571	3.54	%	26,567			$	454	3.41	%	24,382			$	486	3.99	%
Non-interest-earning banking assets:
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities	(37		)					(39		)
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities															41							(52		)
Allowance for loan losses	(214		)					(192		)					(218		)					(212		)
Other assets	404							373							379							411
Total non-interest-earning banking assets	153							142							202							147
Total banking assets	$	24,612						$	21,748						$	26,769						$	24,529
Interest-bearing banking liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market and NOW accounts															$	22,431		$	19	0.17	%	$	20,798		$	69	0.66	%
Certificates of deposit	$	527		$	9	2.20	%	$	353		$	4	1.60	%	$	937		$	10	2.10	%	$	510		$	5	2.13	%
Savings, money market and NOW accounts	20,861			99		0.64	%	18,426			37		0.27	%
FHLB advances and other	919			14		2.13	%	908			15		2.09	%	890			10		2.23	%	931			10		2.15	%
Total interest-bearing banking liabilities	22,307			$	122	0.73	%	19,687			$	56	0.37	%	24,258			$	39	0.32	%	22,239			$	84	0.76	%
Non-interest-bearing banking liabilities	191							176							211							208
Total banking liabilities	22,498							19,863							24,469							22,447
Total banking shareholder’s equity	2,114							1,885							2,300							2,082
Total banking liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	24,612						$	21,748						$	26,769						$	24,529
Excess of interest-earning banking assets over interest-bearing banking liabilities/net interest income	$	2,152		$	610			$	1,919		$	515			$	2,309		$	415			$	2,143		$	402
Bank net interest:
Spread						3.26	%						3.17	%						3.09	%						3.23	%
Margin (net yield on interest-earning banking assets)						3.32	%						3.20	%						3.12	%						3.30	%
Ratio of interest-earning banking assets to interest-bearing banking liabilities						109.65	%						109.75	%						109.52	%						109.64	%

Fee income on bank loans included in interest income for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ was ~~$14~~$9 million and ~~$19~~$11 million, respectively.

The yield on tax-exempt loans in the preceding table is presented on a ~~tax-equivalent~~taxable-equivalent basis utilizing the applicable federal statutory tax rates for each of the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis


	Nine months ended June 30,								Six months ended March 31,
	2019 compared to 2018								2020 compared to 2019
	Increase/(decrease) due to								Increase/(decrease) due to
$ in millions	Volume		Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest revenue:
Interest income:
Interest-earning banking assets:
Cash	$	2	$	7		$	9		$	3		$	(9	)	$	(6	)
Available-for-sale securities	7		8			15			5			(1		)	4
Bank loans, net of unearned income:
Bank loans, net of unearned income and deferred expenses:
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	17		32			49			2			(23		)	(21		)
CRE construction loans	2		1			3			1			(1		)	—
CRE loans	8		17			25			5			(13		)	(8		)
Tax-exempt loans	3		1			4			(1		)	—			(1		)
Residential mortgage loans	15		7			22			13			(4		)	9
SBL and other	15		16			31			8			(16		)	(8		)
Loans held for sale	1		1			2			—			(1		)	(1		)
Total bank loans, net	61		75			136			28			(58		)	(30		)
FHLB stock, Federal Reserve Bank stock, and other	1		—			1
FHLB stock, FRB stock, and other									1			(1		)	—
Total interest-earning banking assets	71		90			161			37			(69		)	(32		)
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing banking liabilities:
Bank deposits:
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts									5			(55		)	(50		)
Certificates of deposit	2		3			5			5			—			5
Savings, money market, and NOW accounts	5		57			62
FHLB advances and other	—		(1		)	(1		)
Total interest-bearing banking liabilities	7		59			66			10			(55		)	(45		)
Change in net interest income	$	64	$	31		$	95		$	27		$	(14	)	$	13

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Results of Operations – Other

This segment includes our private equity investments, ~~as well as~~interest income on certain corporate cash balances, and certain corporate overhead costs of RJF that are not allocated to other segments, including the interest ~~cost~~costs on our public ~~debt, and the acquisition and integration costs associated with certain acquisitions.~~debt. For an overview of our Other segment operations, refer to the information presented in “Item 1 - Business” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Operating results


	Three months ended June 30,								Nine months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2019			2018			% change		2019			2018			% change		2020			2019			% change		2020			2019			% change
Revenues:
Interest income	$	12		$	11		9	%	$	42		$	28		50	%	$	12		$	14		(14	)%	$	24		$	30		(20	)%
Gains on private equity investments	2			3			(33	)%	8			21			(62	)%
Gains/(losses) on private equity investments																	(39		)	2			NM		(41		)	6			NM
All other	1			2			(50	)%	5			4			25	%	—			3			(100	)%	2			4			(50	)%
Total revenues	15			16			(6	)%	55			53			4	%	(27		)	19			NM		(15		)	40			NM
Interest expense	(19		)	(18		)	6	%	(57		)	(56		)	2	%	(17		)	(19		)	(11	)%	(37		)	(38		)	(3	)%
Net revenues	(4		)	(2		)	100	%	(2		)	(3		)	(33	)%	(44		)	—			NM		(52		)	2			NM
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and other	22			20			10	%	59			51			16	%
Acquisition-related expenses	—			—			—		—			4			(100	)%
Total non-interest expenses	22			20			10	%	59			55			7	%	2			17			(88	)%	25			37			(32	)%
Loss before taxes and including noncontrolling interests	(26		)	(22		)	(18	)%	(61		)	(58		)	(5	)%
Noncontrolling interests	(1		)	2			NM		(1		)	2			NM
Pre-tax loss excluding noncontrolling interests	$	(25	)	$	(24	)	(4	)%	$	(60	)	$	(60	)	—
Pre-tax loss																	$	(46	)	$	(17	)	(171	)%	$	(77	)	$	(35	)	(120	)%

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared with the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2018~~

~~The pre-tax loss was essentially unchanged from the loss generated in the prior year quarter.~~

Net revenues decreased $2 million primarily due to a decrease in gains on private equity investments, offset by an increase in interest income. Interest income increased primarily as a result of the increase in interest rates earned on higher corporate cash balances.

~~Non-interest expenses increased $2 million, or 10%, driven by higher advertising-related expenses.~~

~~Nine months ended June 30,~~March 31, 2019 ~~compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2018~~

The pre-tax loss of ~~$60~~$46 million was ~~flat versus~~$29 million larger than the loss generated in the ~~prior year~~prior-year quarter.

Net revenues for the current quarter included $39 million of private equity valuation losses, compared with gains of $2 million in the prior-year quarter. During the current quarter, $22 million of the losses on private equity were attributable to noncontrolling interests, which were reflected as an offset within other expenses. These valuation losses were primarily the result of the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on certain of our investments. Although net interest was flat compared with the prior-year quarter, we expect the impact of the decline in short-term interest rates implemented toward the end of the quarter, and the issuance of $500 million of senior notes payable at the end of the quarter to negatively affect our net interest in this segment in future quarters.

Non-interest expenses decreased $15 million, or 88%, primarily due to the aforementioned $22 million offset of private equity valuation losses related to noncontrolling interests in other expenses. Increases in compensation-related expenses and advertising expenses partially offset the decrease in other expenses.

Six months ended March 31, 2020 compared with the six months ended March 31, 2019

The pre-tax loss of $77 million was $42 million larger than the loss generated in the prior-year period.

Net revenues ~~increased $1~~decreased $54 million from income of $2 million in the prior-year period to a loss of $52 million, primarily due to $41 million of private equity valuation losses, compared with gains of $6 million in the prior-year period. In the current-year period, $23 million of the losses on private equity investments were attributable to noncontrolling interests, which were reflected as an ~~increase in interest income,~~offset within other expenses. These valuation losses were primarily ~~as a~~the result of the ~~increase in interest rates earned on higher corporate cash balances, partially offset by lower gains on private equity investments. The prior year period included gains~~negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on certain of our ~~private equity investments that were sold during fiscal year 2018.~~investments. Interest earned on corporate cash balances also decreased due to lower short-term interest rates, partially offset by the impact of higher average balances.

Non-interest expenses ~~increased $4~~decreased $12 million, or 7%32%, primarily ~~driven by higher~~due to the aforementioned $23 million offset of private equity valuation losses attributable to noncontrolling interests. Increases in compensation-related ~~expenses. The prior year period included certain~~ expenses ~~incurred~~and advertising expenses partially offset the decrease in ~~connection with our acquisition of the Scout Group, which closed in November 2017.~~other expenses.

Certain statistical disclosures by bank holding companies

We are required to provide certain statistical disclosures ~~required for~~as a bank holding ~~companies~~company under the SEC’s Industry Guide 3. The following table provides certain of those disclosures.

Three months ended June 30, Nine months ended June 30,
2019 2018 2019 2018
Return on assets 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 2.2%
Annualized return on equity 16.1% 15.4% 16.2% 13.6%
Average equity to average assets 16.7% 16.7% 16.6% 16.3%
Dividend payout ratio 18.9% 19.4% 19.2% 20.1%

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~



	Three months ended March 31,		Six months ended March 31,
	2020	2019	2020	2019
Return on assets	1.5%	2.7%	2.0%	2.7%
Return on equity	9.9%	16.7%	13.0%	16.2%
Average equity to average assets	15.2%	16.3%	15.7%	16.5%
Dividend payout ratio	30.8%	18.8%	23.9%	19.4%

Return on assets is computed by dividing annualized net income ~~attributable to RJF~~ for the period indicated by average assets for each respective period. Average assets for the quarter is computed by adding total assets as of the date indicated to the prior quarter-end total, and dividing by two. Average assets for the ~~year to date~~year-to-date period is computed by adding total assets as of each quarter-end date during the year-to-date period to the beginning of the year total, and dividing by ~~four.~~three.

Return on equity is computed by dividing annualized net income ~~attributable to RJF~~ for the period indicated by average equity ~~attributable to RJF~~ for each respective period. Average equity for the quarter is computed by adding ~~the~~ total equity attributable to RJF as of the date indicated to the prior quarter-end total, and dividing by two. Average equity for the ~~year to date~~year-to-date period is computed by adding ~~the~~ total equity attributable to RJF as of each quarter-end date during the year-to-date period to the beginning of the year total, and dividing by ~~four.~~three.

Average equity to average assets is computed by dividing average equity by average assets, as calculated in accordance with the previous explanations.

Dividend payout ratio is computed by dividing dividends declared per common share during the period by earnings per diluted common ~~share.~~share for the period.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Refer to the “Results of Operations - RJ Bank” and “Risk management - Credit risk” sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for the other required disclosures.

Liquidity and capital resources

Liquidity is essential to our business. The primary goal of our liquidity management activities is to ensure adequate funding to conduct our business over a range of economic and market environments.

Senior management establishes our liquidity and capital management framework. This framework includes senior management’s review of short- and long-term cash flow forecasts, review of monthly capital expenditures, monitoring of the availability of alternative sources of financing, and daily monitoring of liquidity in our significant subsidiaries. Our decisions on the allocation of capital to our business units consider, among other factors, projected profitability and cash flow, risk, and impact on future liquidity needs. Our treasury department assists in evaluating, monitoring and controlling the impact that our business activities have on our financial condition, liquidity and capital structure, and maintains our relationships with various lenders. The objective of this framework is to support the successful execution of our business strategies while ensuring ongoing and sufficient liquidity.

Liquidity is provided primarily through our business operations and financing activities. Financing activities could include bank borrowings, repurchase agreement transactions or additional capital raising activities under our “universal” shelf registration statement.

Cash and cash equivalents increased ~~$96 million~~$6.69 billion to ~~$3.60~~$10.65 billion during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, primarily due to ~~$1.51~~$7.95 billion of cash provided by financing activities, partially offset by investing activities, which ~~was primarily driven~~used $2.09 billion. Cash provided by ~~increases~~financing activities mainly related to an increase in bank deposits, as client cash balances increased significantly due to the impact of COVID-19, and ~~short-term borrowings,~~proceeds from our senior notes issuance during the current period, partially offset by our open-market share repurchases and dividends on our common stock during the period. Additionally, a decrease of $85 million in cash segregated pursuant to regulations was offset by $101 million of cash used in our operating activities during the current period.stock. Investing activities ~~used $1.39 billion~~ primarily ~~due~~related to an increase in bank loans and ~~the~~ growth of our available-for-sale securities portfolio during the current period.

We believe our existing assets, most of which are liquid in nature, together with funds generated from operations and available from committed and uncommitted financing facilities provide adequate funds for continuing operations at current levels of activity.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Sources of liquidity

~~Approximately $1.22~~Nearly $2 billion of our total ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 cash and cash equivalents included cash on hand at the parent, as well as parent cash loaned to RJ&A. The following table presents our holdings of cash and cash equivalents.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		March 31, 2020
RJF	$	448	$	445
RJ&A	949		2,193
RJ Bank	1,419		6,992
RJ Ltd.	382		666
RJFS	131		155
Carillon Tower Advisers	89		52
Other subsidiaries	178		145
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	3,596	$	10,648

The significant increase in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2020 was primarily due to an increase in client cash balances as a result of the market volatility toward the end of our second fiscal quarter. Subsequent to March 31, 2020, we utilized additional capacity with third-party banks in our RJBDP, which reduced cash and cash equivalents at RJ Bank by approximately $4 billion.

RJF maintained depository accounts at RJ Bank with a balance of ~~$147~~$179 million as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The portion of this total that was available on demand without restrictions, which amounted to ~~$107~~$108 million as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, is reflected in the RJF total (and is excluded from the RJ Bank cash balance in the preceding table).

RJF had loaned ~~$794 million~~$1.50 billion to RJ&A as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 (such amount is included in the RJ&A cash balance in the preceding table), which RJ&A has invested on behalf of RJF in cash and cash equivalents or otherwise deployed in its normal business activities. On ~~July~~April 1, ~~2019,~~2020, we ~~withdrew~~deposited approximately ~~$160~~$350 million of cash ~~out of~~into RJ&A&A’s segregated reserve accounts as a result of ~~the period-end~~our March 31, 2020 reserve calculation.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

In addition to the cash balances described, we have various other potential sources of cash available to the parent from subsidiaries, as described in the following section.

Liquidity available from subsidiaries

Liquidity is principally available to RJF, the parent company, from RJ&A and RJ Bank.

~~RJ&A is~~Certain of our broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. As a member firm of ~~the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”),~~FINRA, RJ&A is subject to FINRA’s capital requirements, which are substantially the same as Rule 15c3-1. Rule 15c3-1 ~~and is required to maintain~~provides for an “alternative net capital requirement,” which RJ&A has elected. Regulations require that minimum net capital, as defined, be equal to the greater of $1.5 million or 2% of aggregate debit ~~balances~~items arising from client transactions. In addition, covenants in RJ&A’s committed ~~secured~~ financing facilities require its net capital to be a minimum of 10% of aggregate debit items. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, RJ&A significantly exceeded the minimum regulatory requirements, the covenants in its financing arrangements pertaining to net capital, as well as its internally-targeted net capital tolerances. ~~There are~~FINRA may impose certain restrictions, such as restricting withdrawals of equity capital, if a member firm were to fall below a certain threshold or fail to meet minimum net capital requirements.

RJ&A, as a nonbank custodian of Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”), must also ~~limitations on~~satisfy certain Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regulations in order to accept new IRA and plan accounts and retain the accounts for which it serves as nonbank custodian. To maintain adequate net worth under these regulations, RJ&A may have to limit dividends to RJF. We evaluate regulatory requirements, loan covenants and certain internal tolerances when determining the amount of ~~dividends that may be declared by a broker-dealer without FINRA approval.~~liquidity available to RJF from RJ&A.

RJ Bank may pay dividends to RJF without ~~the~~ prior approval of its regulator as long as the dividend does not exceed the sum of RJ Bank’s current calendar year and the previous two calendar years’ retained net income, and RJ Bank maintains its targeted regulatory capital ratios. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, RJ Bank had ~~$271~~$253 million of capital in excess of the amount it would need at that date to maintain its targeted regulatory capital ratios, and could pay a dividend of such amount without requiring prior approval of its regulator.

Although we have liquidity available to us from our other subsidiaries, the available amounts are not as significant as those previously described and, in certain instances, may be subject to regulatory requirements.

Borrowings and financing arrangements

Committed financing arrangements

Our ability to borrow is dependent upon compliance with the conditions in our various loan agreements and, in the case of secured borrowings, collateral eligibility requirements. Our committed financing arrangements are in the form of either tri-party repurchase agreements or, in the case of the Credit Facility, an unsecured line of credit. The required market value of the collateral associated with the committed secured facilities ranges from ~~102%~~105% to 125% of the amount financed.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

The following table presents our committed financing arrangements with third-party lenders, which we generally utilize to finance a portion of our fixed income trading instruments held, and the outstanding balances related thereto.


	June 30, 2019							March 31, 2020
$ in millions	RJ&A		RJF		Total		Total number of arrangements	RJ&A		RJF		Total		Total number of arrangements
Financing arrangement:
Committed secured	$	200	$	—	$	200	2	$	100	$	—	$	100	1
Committed unsecured ⁽¹⁾	200		300		500		1	200		300		500		1
Total committed financing arrangements	$	400	$	300	$	700	3	$	300	$	300	$	600	2

Outstanding borrowing amount:
Committed secured	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Committed unsecured	—		—		—			—		—		—
Total outstanding borrowing amount	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)

The Credit Facility provides for maximum borrowings of up to $500 million, with a sublimit of $300 million for RJF. RJ&A may borrow up to $500 million under the Credit Facility, depending on the amount of outstanding borrowings by RJF. For additional details on our committed unsecured financing arrangement, see our discussion of the Credit Facility in Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Uncommitted financing arrangements

Our uncommitted financing arrangements are in the form of secured lines of credit, secured bilateral or tri-party repurchase agreements, or unsecured lines of credit. Our arrangements with third-party lenders are generally utilized to finance a portion of our fixed income securities or for cash management purposes. Our uncommitted secured financing arrangements generally require us to post collateral in excess of the amount borrowed. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, we had outstanding borrowings under ~~three~~two uncommitted secured borrowing arrangements with lenders out of a total of 11 uncommitted financing arrangements (six uncommitted secured and five uncommitted unsecured). However, lenders are under no contractual obligation to lend to us under uncommitted credit facilities.

The following table presents our borrowings on uncommitted financing arrangements, all of which were in RJ&A.


$ in millions	June 30, 2019		March 31, 2020
Outstanding borrowing amount:
Uncommitted secured	$	215	$	215
Uncommitted unsecured	—		—
Total outstanding borrowing amount	$	215	$	215

Other financings

RJ Bank had $875 million in FHLB borrowings outstanding at ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, comprised of floating-rate advances totaling $850 million and a $25 million fixed-rate advance, all of which were secured by a blanket lien on RJ Bank’s residential mortgage loan portfolio (see Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding these borrowings). RJ Bank had an additional ~~$2.19~~$2.82 billion in immediate credit available from the FHLB as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and, with the pledge of additional eligible collateral to the FHLB, total available credit of 30% of total assets.

RJ Bank is eligible to participate in the FRB’s discount-window program; however, we do not view borrowings from the FRB as a primary source of funding. The credit available in this program is subject to periodic review, may be terminated or reduced at the discretion of the FRB, and is secured by pledged C&I loans.

We act as an intermediary between broker-dealers and other financial institutions whereby we borrow securities from one broker-dealer and then lend them to another. Where permitted, we have also loaned, to broker-dealers and other financial institutions, securities owned by clients or the firm. We account for each of these types of ~~transaction~~transactions as collateralized agreements and financings, with the outstanding balances related to the securities loaned included in “Securities loaned” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition of this Form 10-Q, in the amount of ~~$429~~$28 million as of ~~June 30, 2019. Such financings are generally collateralized by cash or other collateral.~~March 31, 2020. See Note 76 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for more information on our securities borrowed and securities loaned.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

From time to time we enter into repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements. We account for each of these types of transactions as collateralized agreements and financings, with the outstanding balances of the repurchase agreements included in “Securities sold under agreements to repurchase” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition of this Form 10-Q, in the amount of ~~$165~~$215 million as of ~~June 30, 2019 (which~~March 31, 2020. These balances are reflected in the preceding table of uncommitted financing ~~arrangements).~~arrangements. Such financings are generally collateralized by non-customer, RJ&A-owned securities or by securities that we have received as collateral under reverse repurchase agreements.

The average daily balance outstanding during the five most recent quarters, the maximum month-end balance outstanding during the quarter and the period-end balances for repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements isare detailed in the following table.


	Repurchase transactions						Reverse repurchase transactions						Repurchase transactions						Reverse repurchase transactions
For the quarter ended: ($ in millions)	Average daily balance outstanding		Maximum month-end balance outstanding during the quarter		End of period balance outstanding		Average daily balance outstanding		Maximum month-end balance outstanding during the quarter		End of period balance outstanding		Average daily balance outstanding		Maximum month-end balance outstanding during the quarter		End of period balance outstanding		Average daily balance outstanding		Maximum month-end balance outstanding during the quarter		End of period balance outstanding
March 31, 2020													$	218	$	238	$	215	$	283	$	388	$	130
December 31, 2019													$	184	$	200	$	200	$	355	$	351	$	326
September 30, 2019													$	170	$	158	$	150	$	334	$	343	$	343
June 30, 2019	$	211	$	212	$	165	$	442	$	479	$	411	$	211	$	212	$	165	$	442	$	479	$	411
March 31, 2019	$	172	$	210	$	210	$	358	$	447	$	447	$	172	$	210	$	210	$	358	$	447	$	447
December 31, 2018	$	171	$	189	$	156	$	413	$	479	$	399
September 30, 2018	$	117	$	186	$	186	$	355	$	376	$	373
June 30, 2018	$	151	$	165	$	115	$	364	$	369	$	343

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, in addition to the financing arrangements previously described, we had ~~$20~~$16 million outstanding on a mortgage loan for our St. Petersburg, Florida home-office complex that is included in “Other borrowings” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition of this Form 10-Q.

At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, we had aggregate outstanding senior notes payable of ~~$1.55~~$2.04 billion. Our senior notes payable, exclusive of any unaccreted premiums or discounts and debt issuance costs, was comprised of $250 million par 5.625% senior notes due 2024, $500 million par 3.625% senior notes due 2026, $500 million par 4.65% senior notes due 2030, which were issued during our second fiscal quarter of 2020, and $800 million par 4.95% senior notes due 2046. See Note 1513 of ~~our 2018~~the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form ~~10-K~~10-Q for additional information.

Our issuer and senior long-term debt ratings as of the most current report are detailed in the following table.



Rating Agency	Rating	Outlook
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services	BBB+	Stable
Moody’s Investors Services	Baa1	Stable

Our current long-term debt ratings depend upon a number of factors, including industry dynamics, operating and economic environment, operating results, operating margins, earnings trends and volatility, balance sheet composition, liquidity and liquidity management, capital structure, overall risk management, business diversification and market share, and competitive position in the markets in which we operate. Deteriorations in any of these factors could impact our credit ratings. Any rating downgrades could increase our costs in the event we were to obtain additional financing.

Should our credit rating be downgraded prior to a public debt offering, it is probable that we would have to offer a higher rate of interest to bond holders. A downgrade to below investment grade may make a public debt offering difficult to execute on terms we would consider to be favorable. A downgrade below investment grade could result in the termination of certain derivative contracts and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing overnight collateralization on our derivative instruments in liability positions (see Note 65 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information). A credit downgrade could damage our reputation and result in certain counterparties limiting their business with us, result in negative comments by analysts, ~~and~~ potentially negatively impact investor and/or clients’ perception of us, and cause a decline in our stock ~~price and/or our clients’ perception of us.~~price. None of our borrowing arrangements ~~contain~~contains a condition or event of default related to our credit ratings. However, a credit downgrade would result in the firm incurring a higher facility fee on the $500 million Credit Facility, in addition to triggering a higher interest rate applicable to any borrowings outstanding on that line as of and subsequent to such downgrade. Conversely, an improvement in RJF’s current credit rating could have a favorable impact on the facility fee, as well as the interest rate applicable to any borrowings on such line.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

Other sources and uses of liquidity

We have company-owned life insurance policies which are utilized to fund certain non-qualified deferred compensation plans and other employee benefit plans. Certain of our non-qualified deferred compensation plans and other employee benefit plans are employee-directed while others are company-directed. Certain policies which we could readily borrow against had a cash surrender value of ~~$556~~$512 million as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, comprised of ~~$327~~$298 million related to employee-directed plans and ~~$229~~$214 million related to company-directed plans, and we were able to borrow up to 90%, or ~~$500~~$461 million, of the ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 total without restriction. To effect any such borrowing, the underlying investments would be converted to money market investments, therefore requiring us to take market risk related to the employee-directed plans. There were no borrowings outstanding against any of these policies as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~

~~On July~~March 31, ~~2019, we received approximately $40 million as a result of the tender of certain of our auction rate preferred securities.~~2020.

On May 18, 2018, we filed a “universal” shelf registration statement with the SEC pursuant to ~~be in a position to access the~~which we can issue debt, equity and other capital ~~markets~~instruments if and when necessary or perceived by us to be opportune. Subject to certain conditions, this registration statement will be effective through May 18, 2021.

See the Contractual obligations section of this MD&A for information regarding our contractual obligations.

Statement of financial condition analysis

The assets on our ~~condensed consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~financial condition~~Financial Condition consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents (a large portion of which is segregated for the benefit of clients), receivables including bank loans, financial instruments held either for trading purposes or as investments, and other assets. A significant portion of our assets were liquid in nature, providing us with flexibility in financing our business.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Total assets of ~~$38.68~~$49.81 billion as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 were ~~$1.26~~$10.98 billion, or 3%28%, greater than our total assets as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in assets was primarily due to a ~~$1.17~~$8.72 billion increase in ~~net~~cash and cash and cash equivalents, including cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to regulations, primarily due to a significant increase in client cash balances due to the market volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as proceeds from our $500 million senior notes issuance in March 2020. In addition, available-for-sale securities increased $1.17 billion, bank loans, net increased $897 million and other assets increased $321 million, primarily due to ROU assets recorded as a ~~$264 million increase in our available-for-sale securities portfolio, in line with our growth plan~~result of the adoption of new guidance related to the accounting for ~~such assets.~~leases. Offsetting these increases, ~~brokerage client receivables~~securities purchased under agreements to resell and trading instruments decreased ~~$730 million.~~$213 million and $263 million, respectively.

As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, our total liabilities of ~~$32.11~~$42.98 billion were ~~$1.15~~$10.79 billion, or 4%34%, greater than our total liabilities as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in total liabilities ~~reflected~~was primarily related to the significant increase in client cash balances and was comprised of a ~~$2.22~~$7.74 billion increase in bank deposits, ~~primarily due to~~reflecting higher RJBDP balances held at RJ Bank ~~as well as~~and certificates of deposit issuances during the period, and a ~~$46 million~~$2.72 billion increase ~~in other borrowings related to secured lines of credit. Offsetting these increases were a decrease~~ in brokerage client payables, ~~of $1.28 billion,~~primarily due to ~~a decline~~an increase in client cash held in our CIP as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020. In addition, other payables increased $516 million, primarily due to operating lease liabilities recorded as a result of the adoption of new guidance related to the accounting for leases, and senior notes payable increased $494 million due to the issuance of $500 million of 4.65% senior notes due April 2030. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in accrued compensation, commissions and benefits of ~~$96~~$343 million, primarily due to the annual ~~payments~~payment of certain incentive compensation ~~made in~~during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

See Notes 2 and 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information on our adoption of the new leasing guidance.

Contractual obligations

~~There were no significant changes~~In March 2020, we sold in ~~our contractual obligations presented~~a registered underwritten public offering $500 million in ~~our 2018 Form 10-K, other than in the ordinary course~~aggregate principal amount of ~~business, as of June 30, 2019. See~~4.65% senior notes due April 2030. Refer to Note 1413 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding our senior notes.

Other than the item previously described, there were no other changes to the contractual obligations presented in our 2019 Form 10-K, other than in the ordinary course of business. See Note 15 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding our commitments as of ~~June 30, 2019~~.March 31, 2020.

Regulatory

Refer to the discussion of the regulatory environment in which we operate and the impact on our operations of certain rules and regulations in ~~Item~~“Item 1 ~~“Business~~- Business - Regulation” and ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

In June 2019, the SEC adopted Regulation Best Interest and issued related interpretive guidance. Among other things, Regulation Best Interest requires a broker-dealer to act in the best interest of a retail customer when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to such customer. Regulation Best Interest becomes effective June 30, 2020 and we anticipate the regulation will require us to review and modify our policies and procedures, as well as the associated supervisory and compliance controls, which may lead to additional costs. In July 2019, the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. announced that the compliance enforcement date for its expanded fiduciary standard would be June 30, 2020. Under this standard, all professionals using the “Certified Financial Planner” designation (including brokers) must act as a fiduciary when providing financial advice. In addition, various states have recently proposed legislation, which would impose (fiduciary) standards of conduct on broker-dealers. The adoption of such additional- and in many cases varying- standards could lead us to incur further additional costs.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

RJF and many of its subsidiaries are each subject to various regulatory capital requirements. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, all of our active regulated domestic and international subsidiaries had net capital in excess of minimum requirements. In addition, RJF and RJ Bank were categorized as ~~“well capitalized”~~“well-capitalized” as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The maintenance of certain risk-based and other regulatory capital levels could ~~impact~~influence various capital allocation decisions impacting one or more of our businesses. However, due to the current capital position of RJF and its regulated subsidiaries, we do not anticipate these capital requirements will have a negative impact on our future business activities.

Legislative and regulatory changes in connection with COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in governments around the world implementing several measures to help control the spread of the virus, including, among others, quarantines, travel restrictions and business curtailments. In ~~July 2019,~~addition, governments globally intervened with fiscal policy to mitigate the ~~Fed~~impact of the pandemic, including the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act in the U.S., which aimed to provide economic relief to businesses and individuals.

The CARES Act includes a broad range of provisions intended to support the U.S. economy. Among its provisions, the act allocates funds for a new Paycheck Protection Program that expands an existing Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loan guarantee program for small businesses to keep their employees on payroll and make other eligible payments. Currently, the firm does not act as a lender under these programs and facilities, and has no plans to do so.

The CARES Act also provides certain temporary regulatory relief for financial institutions, including RJF and its subsidiaries. The act permits financial institutions to temporarily suspend requirements under GAAP for COVID-19-related loan modifications that

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

would otherwise be classified as TDRs and to suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the effects of COVID-19 as being a TDR, including impairment for accounting purposes. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Credit risk” for further information on the impact of such loan modifications. The act also permits financial institutions to temporarily delay the implementation of CECL for estimating allowances for credit losses. Given our later adoption date of October 1, 2020, we do not anticipate delaying our adoption. In addition, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC issued a ~~final rule~~joint statement providing banking organizations optional temporary relief by delaying the initial adoption impact of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three-year transition period to ~~simplify~~phase out the aggregate amount of the capital benefit provided during 2020 and ~~clarify~~2021 (i.e., a five-year transition period). As we do not adopt CECL until October 1, 2020, we are currently evaluating whether we intend to avail ourselves of such relief.

The CARES Act grants potential tax relief and liquidity to businesses, including corporate tax provisions that: temporarily allow for the carryback of net operating losses and remove limitations on the use of loss carryforwards, increase interest expense deduction limitations, and allow accelerated depreciation deductions on certain asset improvements. In addition, the CARES Act allows employers to defer the payment, including the deposit, of payroll taxes for the 2020 calendar year from March 27, 2020 until December 31, 2021 for 50 percent of such taxes and December 31, 2022 for the remaining 50 percent.

The CARES Act further provides a number of ~~existing regulatory capital rules for certain~~consumer finance protections. The act also provides a range of forbearance rights with respect to any federally backed residential or multi-family mortgage loan and generally limits the ability of a lender or servicer to institute foreclosure or similar proceedings. The act additionally imposes a moratorium on evictions from dwellings of many tenants. These provisions are consistent with supervisory guidance previously issued by federal banking ~~organizations. Specifically, it simplifies the capital treatment for mortgage servicing assets, certain deferred tax assets, investments in the capital instruments of unconsolidated~~agencies, which also stated that they would not criticize financial institutions for working with customers affected by the outbreak in a safe and ~~minority interest. This rule would~~sound manner. We are modifying our processes to ensure full compliance and are working as appropriate to support affected businesses and individuals during this time.

In addition to guidance regarding supporting customers, federal banking agencies have also ~~allow bank holding companies~~taken a number of other actions. The Federal Reserve, for example, has taken active steps to ~~repurchase common stock without prior approval from~~inject liquidity into the ~~Fed unless otherwise required. It~~economy. The Federal Reserve has reduced the benchmark interest rate in an attempt to stimulate the economy. As previously mentioned, this has and will ~~be effective as~~continue to negatively impact our net interest earnings. In addition, the Federal Reserve has established a number of ~~April 1, 2020,~~new facilities, including to provide liquidity for issuers of commercial paper, money market funds, new bond and loan issuances, outstanding corporate bonds, primary dealers, and small and medium-sized businesses, and has reduced the ~~amendments to simplify capital rules,~~interest rates on borrowings under its discount window.

The Company’s legislative and ~~as of October 1, 2019 for revisions~~regulatory environment is continually changing in response to the ~~pre-approval requirements for the repurchase~~outbreak of ~~common stock. We are evaluating the impact of this rule on our regulatory capital requirements.~~COVID-19, and new or modified laws, regulations and guidance may be promulgated at very short notice.

See Note 1920 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information on regulatory capital requirements.

Critical accounting estimates

The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during any reporting period in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Management has established detailed policies and control procedures intended to ensure the appropriateness of such estimates and assumptions and their consistent application from period to period. For a description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

Due to their nature, estimates involve judgment based upon available information. Actual results or amounts could differ from estimates and the difference could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, understanding these critical accounting estimates is important in understanding our reported results of operations and financial position. We believe that of our accounting estimates and assumptions, those described in the following sections involve a high degree of judgment and complexity. Recent market disruptions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have made it more challenging for us to determine the amount of our allowance for loan losses and the fair value of certain of our assets, particularly our private equity investments. The current circumstances have required a greater reliance on judgment than in recent periods in determining these amounts as of March 31, 2020.

Valuation of financial instruments

The use of fair value to measure financial instruments, with related gains or losses recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, is fundamental to our financial statements and our risk management processes. See Note 2 of

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our fair value accounting policies regarding financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold but not yet purchased. See Note 43 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information on our financial instruments at fair value.

Loss provisions

Refer to ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical accounting estimates - Loss provisions” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for more information.

Loss provisions for legal and regulatory matters

The recorded amount of liabilities related to legal and regulatory matters is subject to significant management judgment. For a description of the significant estimates and judgments associated with establishing such accruals, see the “Contingent liabilities” section of Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. In addition, refer to Note 1415 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for information regarding legal and regulatory matter contingencies as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Loan loss provisions ~~for~~arising from operations of RJ ~~Bank’s loan portfolio~~Bank

We provide an allowance for loan losses which reflects our continuing evaluation of the probable losses inherent in RJ Bank’s loan portfolio. See the discussion regarding our methodology in estimating the allowance for loan losses in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. See Note 87 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information on our bank loans.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

At ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, the amortized cost of all RJ Bank loans was ~~$20.91~~$22.11 billion and anthe allowance for loan losses ~~of $215~~was $324 million, ~~or 1.03%~~which was 1.47% of the held for investment loan ~~portfolio, was recorded against that balance.~~portfolio.

Our process of evaluating probable loan losses includes a complex analysis of several quantitative and qualitative factors, requiring ~~a substantial amount of~~management judgment. As a result, the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses. In such an event, any losses in excess of our allowance would result in a decrease in our net income, as well as a decrease in the level of regulatory capital.

Recent accounting developments

For information regarding our recent accounting developments, see Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

For information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K and Note 1415 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

Effects of inflation

Our assets are primarily liquid in nature and are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, including employee compensation, communications and information processing, and occupancy costs, which may not be readily recoverable through charges for services we provide to our clients. In addition, to the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.

Risk management

Risks are an inherent part of our business and activities. Management of these risks is critical to our fiscal soundness and profitability. Our risk management processes are multi-faceted and require communication, judgment and knowledge of financial products and markets. We have a formal Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program to assess and review aggregate risks across the firm. Our management takes an active role in the ERM process, which requires specific administrative and business functions to participate in the identification, assessment, monitoring and control of various risks. ~~The results of this process are extensively documented and reported to executive management and the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board.~~

The principal risks related to our business activities are market, credit, liquidity, operational, model, and compliance.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Governance

Our Board of Directors oversees the firm’s management and mitigation of risk, setting a culture that encourages ethical conduct and risk management throughout the firm. Senior management communicates and reinforces this culture through three lines of risk management and a number of senior-level management committees. Our first line of risk management, which includes all of our businesses, owns its risks and is responsible for helping to identify, escalate, and mitigate risks arising from its day-to-day activities. The second line of risk management, which includes the Compliance, Legal, and Risk Management departments, supports and provides guidance, advice, and oversight to client-facing businesses and other first-line risk management functions in identifying and mitigating risk. The second line of risk management also tests and monitors the effectiveness of controls, escalates risks when appropriate, and reports on these risks. The third line of risk management, Internal Audit, independently reviews activities conducted by the previous lines of risk management to assess their management and mitigation of risk, providing additional assurance to the Board of Directors and senior management, with a view toward enhancing our oversight, management, and mitigation of risk.

Market risk

Market risk is our risk of loss resulting from the impact of changes in market prices on our trading inventory, ~~derivative~~derivatives and investment positions. We have exposure to market risk primarily through our broker-dealer trading operations and, to a lesser extent, through our banking operations. See ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Market risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our market risk, including how we manage such risk. See Notes 3, 4 5 and 65 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for fair value and other information regarding our trading inventories, available-for-sale securities and derivative instruments.

Interest rate risk

Trading activities

We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our trading ~~inventories~~inventory (primarily comprised of fixed income instruments) in our Capital Markets segment. We actively manage the interest rate risk arising from our fixed income trading securities through the use of hedging strategies that involve U.S. Treasury securities, futures contracts, liquid spread products and derivatives. During our second fiscal quarter of 2020, in response to the significant market volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we took steps to proactively manage our market risk exposures, including enhanced review and monitoring of exposures and risk mitigation efforts. As a result, we reduced our trading inventory during the quarter to reduce risk.

We monitor the Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) for all of our trading portfolios on a daily basis. VaR is an appropriate statistical technique for estimating potential losses in trading portfolios due to typical adverse market movements over a specified time horizon with a suitable confidence level. We apply the Fed’s Market Risk Rule (“MRR”) for the purpose of calculating our capital ratios. The MRR, also known as the “Risk-Based Capital Guidelines: Market Risk” rule released by the Fed, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

(“OCC”) and FDIC, requires us to calculate VaR ~~numbers~~ for all of our trading portfolios, including fixed income, equity, foreign exchange and ~~derivative instruments.~~derivatives.

To calculate VaR, we use historical simulation. This approach assumes that historical changes in market conditions, such as in interest rates and equity prices, are representative of future changes. Simulation is based on daily market data for the previous twelve months. VaR is reported at a 99% confidence level for a one-day time horizon. Assuming that future market conditions change as they have in the past twelve months, we would expect to incur losses greater than those predicted by our one-day VaR estimates about once every 100 trading days, or about three times per year on average. For regulatory capital calculation purposes, we also report VaR numbers for a ten-day time horizon.

The Fed’s MRR requires us to perform daily back-testing procedures of our VaR model, whereby we compare each day’s projected VaR to its regulatory-defined daily trading losses, which exclude fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intraday trading. Regulatory-defined daily trading losses are used to evaluate the performance of our VaR model and are not comparable to our actual daily net revenues. Based on these daily “ex ante” versus “ex post” comparisons, we determine whether the number of times that regulatory-defined daily trading losses exceed VaR is consistent with our expectations at a 99% confidence level. During the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, our regulatory-defined daily loss in our trading portfolios ~~did not exceed~~exceeded our predicted ~~VaR.~~VaR on eleven occasions due to higher levels of market volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The following table sets forth the high, low, period-end and daily average VaR for all of our trading portfolios, including fixed income, equity and derivative instruments, for the period and dates indicated.


	Nine months ended June 30, 2019				Period-end VaR					Three months ended June 30,				Nine months ended June 30,				Six months ended March 31, 2020				Period-end VaR					Three months ended March 31,				Six months ended March 31,
$ in millions	High		Low		June 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		$ in millions	2019		2018		2019		2018		High		Low		March 31, 2020		September 30, 2019		$ in millions	2020		2019		2020		2019
Daily VaR	$	2	$	1	$	1	$	1	Daily average VaR	$	1	$	2	$	1	$	1	$	2	$	1	$	1	$	1	Daily average VaR	$	1	$	1	$	1	$	1

The modeling of the risk characteristics of trading positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While management believes that these assumptions and approximations are reasonable, there is no uniform industry methodology for estimating VaR, and different assumptions or approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. As a result, VaR statistics are more reliable when used as indicators of risk levels and trends within a firm than as a basis for inferring differences in risk-taking across firms.

Separately, RJF provides additional market risk disclosures to comply with the MRR. The results of the application of this market risk capital rule are available on our website under https://www.raymondjames.com/investor-relations/financial-information/filings-and-reports ~~under “Market Risk Rule Disclosure.~~within “Other Reports and Information.”

Should markets suddenly become more volatile, as they did in our second fiscal quarter of 2020, actual trading losses may exceed VaR results presented on a single day and might accumulate over a longer time horizon, such as a number of consecutive trading days. Accordingly, management applies additional controls including position limits, a daily review of trading results, review of the status of aged inventory, independent controls on pricing, monitoring of concentration risk, review of issuer ratings and stress testing. We utilize stress testing to complement our VaR analysis so as to measure risk under historical and hypothetical adverse scenarios. During volatile markets, we may choose to pare our trading inventories to reduce ~~risk.~~

~~As a part~~risk, as we did during our second fiscal quarter of our fixed income public finance operations, we enter into forward commitments to purchase agency MBS which are issued on behalf of various state and local housing finance agencies. These activities result in exposure to interest rate risk. In order to hedge the interest rate risk to which we would otherwise be exposed between the date of the commitment and the date of sale of the MBS, we enter into TBA security contracts with investors for generic MBS at specific rates and prices to be delivered on settlement dates in the future. See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding these activities.2020.

Banking operations

RJ Bank maintains an earning asset portfolio that is comprised of cash, C&I loans, tax-exempt loans, ~~SBL,~~ commercial and residential real estate loans, SBL and other loans, as well as MBS and CMOs ~~(both of which are held~~(held in the available-for-sale securities portfolio), ~~Small Business Administration~~SBA loan securitizations and a trading portfolio of corporate loans. ~~Those~~These earning assets are primarily funded by client deposits. Based on its current earning asset portfolio, RJ Bank is subject to interest rate risk. RJ Bank analyzes interest rate risk based on forecasted net interest income, which is the net amount of interest received and interest paid, and the net portfolio valuation, both in a range of interest rate scenarios.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

One of the objectives of RJ Bank’s Asset Liability Management Committee is to manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The methods used to measure this sensitivity are described in ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Market risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

We utilize a hedging strategy using interest rate swaps as a result of RJ Bank’s asset and liability management process. For further information regarding this ~~risk management objective, see the discussion of this~~ hedging strategy, insee Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form ~~10-K and in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.~~10-K.

The following table is an analysis of RJ Bank’s estimated net interest income over a ~~12 month~~12-month period based on instantaneous shifts in interest rates (expressed in basis points) using RJ Bank’s own asset/liability model.


Instantaneous changes in rate	Net interest income ($ in millions)	Projected change in net interest income	Net interest income ($ in millions)	Projected change in net interest income
+200	$880	(1.23)%	$951	30.27%
+100	$887	(0.45)%	$893	22.33%
0	$891	—	$730	—
-100	$827	(7.18)%
-25			$683	(6.44)%

Refer to ~~“Net~~“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Net interest analysis” inof this ~~MD&A~~Form 10-Q for a discussion of the impact changes in short-term interest rates could have on the firm’s operations.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The following table shows the contractual maturities of RJ Bank’s loan portfolio at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, including contractual principal repayments. This table does not include any estimates of prepayments, which could shorten the average loan lives and cause the actual timing of the loan repayments to differ significantly from those shown in the table. Loan amounts in the table exclude unearned income and deferred expenses.


	Due in								Due in
$ in millions	One year or less		> One year – five years		> 5 years		Total		One year or less		> One year – five years		> five years		Total
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	$	138	$	4,701	$	3,562	$	8,401	$	165	$	4,077	$	4,074	$	8,316
CRE construction loans	34		214		—		248		10		128		42		180
CRE loans	413		2,502		553		3,468		627		2,610		593		3,830
Tax-exempt loans	—		31		1,265		1,296		—		76		1,190		1,266
Residential mortgage loans	—		4		4,194		4,198		—		4		4,860		4,864
SBL and other	3,133		44		—		3,177		3,526		20		—		3,546
Total loans held for investment	3,718		7,496		9,574		20,788		4,328		6,915		10,759		22,002
Loans held for sale	—		—		125		125		—		—		115		115
Total loans	$	3,718	$	7,496	$	9,699	$	20,913	$	4,328	$	6,915	$	10,874	$	22,117

The following table shows the distribution of the recorded investment of those RJ Bank loans that mature in more than one year between fixed and adjustable interest rate loans at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. Loan amounts in the table exclude unearned income and deferred expenses.

Interest rate type
$ in millions Fixed Adjustable Total
Loans held for investment:

C&I loans $ 96
$ 8,167
$ 8,263
CRE construction loans —
214
214
CRE loans 79
2,976
3,055
Tax-exempt loans 1,264
32
1,296
Residential mortgage loans 239
3,959

4,198
SBL and other 44
—
44
Total loans held for investment 1,722
15,348
17,070
Loans held for sale 125
—
125
Total loans $ 1,847
$ 15,348
$ 17,195

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~



	Interest rate type
$ in millions	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	$	140	$	8,011	$	8,151
CRE construction loans	2		168		170
CRE loans	70		3,133		3,203
Tax-exempt loans	1,266		—		1,266
Residential mortgage loans	222		4,642		4,864
SBL and other	—		20		20
Total loans held for investment	1,700		15,974		17,674
Loans held for sale	2		113		115
Total loans	$	1,702	$	16,087	$	17,789

Contractual loan terms for C&I, CRE, CRE construction and residential mortgage loans may include an interest rate floor, cap and/or fixed interest rates for a certain period of time, which would impact the timing of the interest rate reset for the respective loan. See the discussion within the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Credit risk - Risk monitoring process” section of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding RJ Bank’s interest-only residential mortgage loan portfolio.

In our RJ Bank available-for-sale securities portfolio, we hold primarily fixed-rate agency MBS and CMOs which were carried at fair value on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, with changes in the fair value of the portfolio recorded through OCI in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, our RJ Bank available-for-sale securities portfolio had a fair value of ~~$2.96~~$4.27 billion with a weighted-average yield of ~~2.46%~~2.27% and ~~an average expected~~a duration of three years. See Note 54 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional ~~information on the fair value of these securities.~~information.

Equity price risk

We are exposed to equity price risk as a ~~consequence~~result of our capital markets activities. Our broker-dealer activities are primarily client-driven, with the objective of meeting clients’ needs while earning revenues to compensate for the risk associated with carrying inventory. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our inventory of equity securities by monitoring those security positions throughout each day and establishing position limits.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Foreign exchange risk

We are subject to foreign exchange risk due to our investments in foreign subsidiaries as well as transactions and resulting balances denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. For example, a portion of our bank loan portfolio includes loans which are denominated in Canadian dollars totaling ~~$1.09~~$1.11 billion and ~~$1.05~~$1.10 billion at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. A portion of such loans are held by RJ Bank’s Canadian subsidiary, which is discussed in the following sections.

Investments in foreign subsidiaries

RJ Bank has an investment in a Canadian subsidiary, resulting in foreign exchange risk. To mitigate its foreign exchange risk, RJ Bank utilizes short-term, forward foreign exchange contracts. These ~~derivative agreements~~derivatives are primarily accounted for as net investment hedges in the condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 65 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding these ~~derivative contracts.~~derivatives.

We had foreign exchange risk in our investment in RJ Ltd. of CAD ~~368~~338 million at ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, which was not hedged. Foreign exchange gains/losses related to this investment are primarily reflected in OCI inon our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. See Note 1516 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding our components of OCI.

We also have foreign exchange risk associated with our investments in subsidiaries located in Europe. These investments are not hedged and we do not believe we have material foreign exchange risk either individually, or in the aggregate, pertaining to these subsidiaries.

Transactions and resulting balances denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar

We are subject to foreign exchange risk due to our holdings of cash and certain other assets and liabilities resulting from transactions denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. Any currency-related gains/losses arising from these foreign currency denominated balances are reflected in “Other” revenues in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The foreign exchange risk associated with a portion of such transactions and balances denominated in foreign currency are mitigated utilizing short-term, forward foreign exchange contracts. Such derivatives are not designated hedges and therefore, the related gains/losses associated with these contracts are included in “Other” revenues in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. See Note 65 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for information regarding our ~~derivative contracts.~~derivatives.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower’s, issuer’s or counterparty’s ability to meet its financial obligations under contractual or agreed upon terms. The nature and amount of credit risk depends on the type of transaction, the structure and duration of that transaction, and the parties involved. Credit risk is an integral component of the profit assessment of lending and other

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

financing activities. See further discussion of our credit risk, including how we manage such risk, in ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Credit risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K.

The sharp decline in economic activity as a result of COVID-19 has caused increased credit risk in general and particularly with regard to companies in sectors that have been most significantly impacted by the economic disruption, including oil and gas, airlines, entertainment and leisure, restaurants and gaming. Given the stresses on our clients’ liquidity, we have enhanced our credit monitoring activities, with an increased focus on monitoring our credit exposures and counterparty credit risk, including the risk that trades may not settle with a given counterparty. We have required collateral to be posted across our credit risk exposures in accordance with agreements with our borrowers and counterparties.

RJ Bank has a substantial loan portfolio. AWhile RJ Bank’s loan portfolio is diversified, a significant downturn in the overall economy, such as the downturn during our second fiscal quarter, deterioration in real estate values or a significant issue within any sector or sectors where RJ Bank has a concentration ~~could~~will generally result in large provisions for loan losses and/or charge-offs.

~~Our allowance for loan losses is regularly evaluated with adjustments made on a quarterly basis. Several factors were taken into consideration in evaluating~~ RJ Bank determines the allowance ~~for loan losses at~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~, including the risk profile of the portfolios, net charge-offs during the period, the level of nonperforming loans and delinquency ratios. RJ Bank also considered the uncertainty related to certain industry sectors and the extent of credit exposure to specific borrowers within the portfolio. Finally, RJ Bank considered current economic conditions and other factors that might impact the portfolio. RJ Bank determined the allowance that was required for specific loan grades based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis, RJ Bank evaluates its methods for determining the allowance for each class of loans and makes enhancements it considers appropriate. ~~There was no material change~~

Our allowance for loan losses is regularly evaluated with adjustments made on a quarterly basis. Several factors were taken into consideration in ~~RJ Bank’s methodology for determining~~evaluating the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2020, including the risk profile of the portfolios, net charge-offs during the ~~nine months ended June 30, 2019.~~period, the level of nonperforming loans, delinquency ratios and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. RJ Bank also

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

considered the uncertainty related to certain industry sectors and the extent of credit exposure to specific borrowers within the portfolio. Finally, RJ Bank considered current economic conditions that might impact the portfolio. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a portfolio-wide assessment on our loan portfolio. As a result, we downgraded loans in certain impacted industries, which gave rise to an increase in the loan loss provision during the current quarter. We will continue to assess the impact of COVID-19 and, as more information becomes available regarding the financial repercussions to our borrowers, the risk ratings for individual loans will be updated and the allowance will be adjusted accordingly.

RJ Bank’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of bank loans outstanding was ~~1.03%~~1.47% and 1.04% at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. See Note 87 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for detail on the changes in RJ Bank’s allowance for loan losses.

The bank loan loss provision for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019 increased to $16~~March 31, 2020 was $107 million compared to ~~$14~~a loan loss provision of $21 million infor the ~~prior year~~prior-year period. See further explanation of the loan loss provision increase in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis ~~of Financial Condition and~~- Results of Operations - RJ Bank” of this Form 10-Q.

The level of charge-off activity is a factor that is considered in evaluating the potential for severity of future credit losses. The following table presents net loan (charge-offs)/recoveries and the percentage of net loan (charge-offs)/recoveries to the average outstanding loan balances by loan portfolio segment.


	Three months ended June 30,									Nine months ended June 30,										Three months ended March 31,								Six months ended March 31,
	2019				2018					2019					2018					2020			2019					2020			2019
$ in millions	Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount		% of avg. outstanding loans		Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount			% of avg. outstanding loans		Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount			% of avg. outstanding loans		Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount			% of avg. outstanding loans		Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount		% of avg. outstanding loans	Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount			% of avg. outstanding loans		Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount		% of avg. outstanding loans	Net loan (charge-off)/recovery amount			% of avg. outstanding loans
C&I loans	$	1	0.06	%	$	(5	)	0.23	%	$	(2	)	0.02	%	$	(9	)	0.15	%	$	—	—	$	(3	)	0.06	%	$	—	—	$	(3	)	0.06	%
CRE loans	—		—		—			—		(3		)	0.13	%	—			—		—		—	(3		)	0.20	%	—		—	(3		)	0.19	%
Residential mortgage loans	—		—		1			0.08	%	1			0.02	%	1			0.05	%	—		—	—			—		—		—	1			0.04	%
Total	$	1	0.02	%	$	(4	)	0.08	%	$	(4	)	0.03	%	$	(8	)	0.05	%	$	—	—	$	(6	)	0.06	%	$	—	—	$	(5	)	0.05	%

The level of nonperforming loans is another indicator of potential future credit losses. The following table presents the nonperforming loans balance and total allowance for loan losses for the periods presented.


	June 30, 2019					September 30, 2018					March 31, 2020					September 30, 2019
$ in millions	Nonperforming loan balance			Allowance for loan losses balance		Nonperforming loan balance			Allowance for loan losses balance		Nonperforming loan balance			Allowance for loan losses balance		Nonperforming loan balance			Allowance for loan losses balance
Loans held for investment:
C&I loans	$	22		$	134	$	2		$	123	$	4		$	197	$	19		$	139
CRE construction loans	—			4		—			3		—			3		—			3
CRE loans	10			46		—			47		6			88		8			46
Tax-exempt loans	—			9		—			9		—			11		—			9
Residential mortgage loans	21			16		23			17		14			18		16			16
SBL and other	—			6		—			4		—			7		—			5
Total	$	53		$	215	$	25		$	203	$	24		$	324	$	43		$	218
Total nonperforming loans as a % of RJ Bank total loans	0.25		%			0.12		%			0.11		%			0.21		%

Included in nonperforming residential mortgage loans ~~in the preceding table~~ were ~~$10~~$7 million in loans for which $5$4 million in charge-offs were previously recorded, resulting in less exposure within the remaining balance. See Note 87 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for loan categories as a percentage of total loans receivable.

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

The nonperforming loan balances in the preceding table exclude $11 million and $12 million as of March 31, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively, of residential TDRs ~~as of both June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018,~~ which were returned to accrual status in accordance with our policy. Total nonperforming assets, including other real estate acquired in the settlement of residential mortgages, amounted to ~~$56~~$27 million and ~~$28~~$46 million at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of RJ Bank total assets ~~was 0.22%~~were 0.08% and ~~0.12%~~0.18% at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Although our nonperforming assets as a percentage of RJ Bank assets remained low as of March 31, 2020, and we had no charge-offs during our second fiscal quarter, prolonged or further market deterioration could result in an increase in our nonperforming assets, an increase in our allowance for loan losses and/or an increase

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

in net charge-offs in future periods, although the extent will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

We have received requests from certain clients for forbearance, or deferral of their loan payments to us, driven or exacerbated by the economic impacts of the COVID pandemic. Certain clients have also requested modifications of covenant terms. The CARES Act permits, among other things, financial institutions to suspend requirements under GAAP for loan modifications to borrowers affected by COVID-19 and is intended to provide interpretive guidance as to conditions that would constitute a short-term modification that would not meet the definition of a TDR. We have made certain loan modifications that relate to short-term payment deferrals that are not considered TDRs. Based on the outstanding principal balance as of the end of April 2020, we have received payment deferral requests on approximately 3% and 2% of our corporate and residential loans, respectively.

Loan underwriting ~~process~~policies

RJ Bank’s underwriting ~~processes~~policies for the major types of loans are described in ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Credit risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. There were no material changes in RJ Bank’s underwriting ~~processes~~policies during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Risk monitoring process

Another component of credit risk strategy at RJ Bank is the ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all residential, SBL, ~~and other,~~ corporate and tax-exempt credit exposures, as well as our rigorous processes to manage and limit credit losses arising from loan delinquencies. There are various other factors included in these processes, depending on the loan portfolio. There were no material changes to those processes and policies during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Residential mortgage and SBL and ~~residential mortgage loans~~other loan portfolios

The ~~marketable~~ collateral securing RJ Bank’s SBL and other portfolio is monitored on a recurring basis, with marketable collateral monitored on a daily basis. Collateral adjustments are made by the borrower as necessary to ensure RJ Bank’s loans are adequately secured, resulting in minimizing its credit risk. Collateral calls have been minimal relative to our SBL and other portfolio with no losses incurred to date.

We track and review many factors to monitor credit risk in RJ Bank’s residential mortgage loan portfolio. The factors include, but are not limited to: loan performance trends, loan product parameters and qualification requirements, borrower credit scores, ~~occupancy (i.e., owner occupied, second home or investment property),~~ level of documentation, loan purpose, geographic concentrations, average loan size and ~~loan policy exceptions.~~LTV ratios. These measures, while considered and reviewed in establishing the allowance for loan losses, have not resulted in any material adjustments to RJ Bank’s historical loss rates.

The following table presents ~~as of the date indicated,~~ a summary of delinquent residential mortgage loans, the vast majority of which are first mortgage loans, which isare comprised of loans which are two or more payments past due as well as loans in the process of foreclosure.

Amount of delinquent residential loans Delinquent residential loans as a percentage of outstanding loan balances
$ in millions 30-89 days 90 days or more Total 30-89 days 90 days or more Total
June 30, 2019 $ 1
$ 15
$ 16
0.03 % 0.36 % 0.39 %
September 30, 2018 $ 2
$ 13
$ 15
0.06 % 0.33 % 0.39 %



	Amount of delinquent residential loans						Delinquent residential loans as a percentage of outstanding loan balances
$ in millions	30-89 days		90 days or more		Total		30-89 days		90 days or more		Total
March 31, 2020	$	2	$	8	$	10	0.04	%	0.16	%	0.20	%
September 30, 2019	$	2	$	10	$	12	0.04	%	0.22	%	0.26	%

Our ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 percentage continues to compare favorably to the national average for over 30 day delinquencies of ~~2.99%~~2.54%, as most recently reported by the Fed.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Credit risk is also managed by diversifying the residential mortgage portfolio. Most of the loans in our residential loan portfolio are to Private Client Group clients across the country. The following table details the geographic concentrations (top five states) of RJ Bank’s one-to-four family residential mortgage loans.


	June 30, 2019		March 31, 2020
	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total residential mortgage loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total residential mortgage loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total loans
CA	24.8%	5.0%	26.0%	5.7%
FL	16.6%	3.4%	16.5%	3.6%
TX			8.1%	1.8%
NY	8.3%	1.7%	7.2%	1.6%
TX	8.1%	1.6%
CO	3.6%	0.7%	3.9%	0.9%

Loans where borrowers may be subject to payment increases include adjustable rate mortgage loans with terms that initially require payment of interest only. Payments may increase significantly when the interest-only period ends and the loan principal begins to amortize. At ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, these loans totaled ~~$1.20~~$1.51 billion and ~~$992 million,~~$1.29 billion, respectively, or approximately

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~

30% ~~and 25%~~ of the residential mortgage portfolio ~~respectively.~~as of each of these dates. The weighted average number of years before the remainder of the loans, which were still in their interest-only period at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, begins amortizing is ~~6.3~~5.9 years.

A component of credit risk management for the residential portfolio is the LTV ratio and borrower credit score at origination or purchase. The most recent weighted-average LTV ratios and FICO scores at origination of RJ Bank’s residential first mortgage loan portfolio were 64% and ~~761,~~762, respectively.

Corporate and tax-exempt loans

Credit risk in RJ Bank’s corporate and tax-exempt loan portfolios isare monitored on an individual loan basis. The majority of RJ Bank’s tax-exempt loan portfolio is comprised of loans to investment-grade borrowers.

Credit risk is managed by diversifying the corporate loan portfolio. RJ Bank’s corporate loan portfolio does not contain a significant concentration in any single industry. The following table details the industry concentrations (top five categories) of RJ Bank’s corporate loans.


	June 30, 2019		March 31, 2020
	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total corporate loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total corporate loans	Loans outstanding as a % of RJ Bank total loans
Automotive/transportation			7.4%	4.1%
Office real estate			7.2%	3.9%
Business systems and services	8.2%	4.7%	7.1%	3.9%
Office real estate	7.6%	4.4%
Hospitality	5.3%	3.0%	6.9%	3.8%
Automotive/transportation	5.2%	3.0%
Consumer products and services	4.5%	2.6%
Multifamily			5.3%	2.9%

RJ Bank’s exposure to the energy, airline, entertainment/leisure, restaurant and gaming sectors, those most affected by the economic disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic, were each less than 2% of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2020.

Although we saw significant deterioration in oil prices during our second fiscal quarter, our energy portfolio primarily consists of loans to midstream distribution companies and convenience stores, with no loans to exploration and production enterprises. As a result, the portfolio has minimal direct commodity price exposure. However, if we continue to see a significant deterioration in oil prices, our clients, and as a result our loans to such clients, could be negatively impacted in the future.

Liquidity risk

See the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and capital resources” of this Form 10-Q for information regarding our liquidity and how we manage liquidity risk.

Operational risk

Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, business disruptions, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in our technology or financial operating systems and inadequacies or breaches in our control processes, including cybersecurity incidents. See ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Operational risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of our operational risk and certain of our risk mitigation processes. ~~There~~

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we activated and successfully executed on our business continuity protocols and continue to monitor the COVID-19 crisis under such protocols. We have ~~been no~~endeavored to safeguard our employees and to ensure continuity of business operations for our clients. As a result, nearly all of our employees are working remotely. Our systems and infrastructure have continued to support the increased volumes of activity, without any significant operational or technology disruptions. We did not incur any material ~~changes in such processes~~losses related to our operational risks during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

As more fully described in the discussion of our business technology risks included in various risk factors presented in ~~Item~~“Item 1A ~~“Risk~~- Risk Factors” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K and “Part II - Other Information - Item 1A - Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q, despite our implementation of protective measures and endeavoring to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to human error, natural disasters, power loss, ~~cyberattacks~~cyber-attacks and other information security breaches, ~~as well as~~and other events that could have an impact on the security and stability of our operations. Notwithstanding the precautions we take, if one or more of these events were to occur, this could jeopardize the information we confidentially maintain, including that of our clients and counterparties, which is processed, stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our clients or counterparties. To-date, we have not experienced any material losses relating to ~~cyberattacks~~cyber-attacks or other information security breaches; however, there can be no assurances that we will not suffer such losses in the future.

Model risk

Model risk refers to the possibility of unintended business outcomes arising from the design, implementation or use of models. See ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Model risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for information regarding how we utilize models throughout the firm and how we manage model risk.

Compliance risk

Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss, or reputational damage that wethe firm may suffer from a failure to comply with applicable laws, external standards, or internal requirements. See ~~Item~~“Item 7 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of

~~RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Compliance risk” of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K for information on our compliance risks, including how we manage such risks. There have been no material changes in our compliance risk mitigation processes during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See ~~Item~~“Item 2 ~~“Management’s~~- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management” of this Form 10-Q for our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this report, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~Not applicable.~~Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and the trading price of our common stock. For information regarding these risks and uncertainties, see “Item 1A - Risk Factors” of our 2019 Form 10-K. The following represents material changes to our risk factors disclosed in our 2019 Form 10-K.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

The recent outbreak of COVID-19 has adversely affected, and will likely continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our business and the entire financial services industry and is likely to continue to do so. Since the beginning of January 2020, the outbreak has caused significant volatility and disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the U.S., and on March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency with respect to COVID-19. The pandemic has led governments and other authorities around the world, including federal, state and local authorities in the U.S., to impose measures intended to control its spread, including restrictions on travel and the conduct of business, such as stay-at-home orders, quarantines, travel bans, border closings, business closures and other similar measures. If COVID-19, or another highly infectious or contagious disease, continues to spread or the response to contain it is unsuccessful, we will likely experience further adverse effects on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. A prolonged period of economic deterioration may also result in impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. The extent of such effects will depend on future developments which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the geographic spread of the virus, the overall severity of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, the measures taken by various governmental authorities in response to the outbreak and the possible further impacts on the global economy.

The continued spread of COVID-19, or another highly infectious or contagious disease, has caused and could continue to cause severe disruptions in our business. These effects have included restrictions on our employees’ ability to travel, as well as temporary closures of our facilities and the facilities of our customers, suppliers, or other vendors. We often recruit skilled professionals and new clients by visiting their offices or having them visit our offices. Consequently, any travel restrictions or other disruptions that prevent us from meeting with professional prospects or potential new clients may adversely impact our ability to recruit such professional prospects or engage potential new clients. Although we maintain contingency plans for events such as pandemic outbreaks, the further spread of COVID-19 or a similar contagious disease could also impair the availability of our executive officers who are necessary to conduct our business. In addition, any continued spread of COVID-19 or new outbreak could harm the operations of third-party service providers who perform critical services for our business.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused, and is likely to continue to cause, severe economic, market and other disruptions worldwide. As a result of a shift to fee-based accounts over the past several years, a larger portion of our client assets is more directly affected by market movements. The significant decrease in the market value of our clients’ assets has had and will continue to have a negative impact on our financial results due to the fact that asset-based fees are earned on the market value of the underlying client assets, many of which are billed based on assets as of the beginning of a quarter. This market decline will likely have a greater negative affect on revenues and profitability than would have been experienced in prior years due to the increased proportion of our asset-based revenues. Market volatility could also cause clients to move their investments to lower margin products, or withdraw them, which could have an adverse impact on our profitability. We could also experience a material reduction in trading volume and lower securities prices in times of market volatility, which would result in lower brokerage revenues, including losses on firm inventory. The fair values of certain of our investments could also continue to be negatively impacted, resulting in additional unrealized or realized losses on such investments. In addition, the market volatility and uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause our institutional clients to abandon announced transactions and/or cease exploration of potential transactions which could negatively impact our Capital Markets revenues, including those derived from our investment banking business.

Moreover, certain actions taken by U.S. or other governmental authorities, including the Federal Reserve, that are intended to ameliorate the macroeconomic effects of COVID-19 have had, and will continue to have, a negative effect on our business. The Fed significantly lowered interest rates in response to COVID-19 pandemic concerns in March. These decreases in short-term interest rates, in addition

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

to those in late 2019, have had a negative impact on our results, as we have certain assets and liabilities, primarily held in our PCG, RJ Bank and Other segments, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Fees we earn from third-party banks on client cash balances swept to such banks as part of RJBDP are also sensitive to changes in interest rates. These market interest rate declines will continue to negatively impact results in future quarters.

In addition, we are generally exposed to the credit risk that third-parties that owe us money, securities or other assets will fail to meet their obligations to us due to numerous causes, and this risk has been and may further be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects of COVID-19. We lend to businesses and individuals, including through offering C&I loans, commercial and residential mortgage loans, tax-exempt loans, home equity lines of credit, and other loans generally collateralized by securities. We also incur credit risk through our investments. Our credit risk has increased, and such risk and credit losses may continue to increase to the extent our loans or investments are to borrowers or issuers who as a group may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by declining economic or market conditions as a result of COVID-19 such as those operating in the airline, restaurant, gaming, entertainment/leisure and energy sectors. The deterioration of our credit exposure due to COVID-19 has led to additional loan loss provisions and could lead to further additional loan loss provisions and/or charges-offs, or credit impairment of our investments, and subsequently have a material impact on our net income, regulatory capital and liquidity.

We cannot assure you that conditions in financial markets will not continue to deteriorate as a result of the pandemic, or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, resulting in actions such as restructuring debt or obtaining additional financing on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive.

Any cyber-attack or other security breach of our technology systems, or those of our clients or other third-party vendors we rely on, could subject us to significant liability and harm our reputation.

Our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of sensitive and confidential financial, personal and other information in our computer systems and networks. There have been several highly publicized cases involving financial services companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or other confidential information in recent years, as well as cyber-attacks involving the theft, dissemination and destruction of corporate information or other assets, in some cases as a result of failure to follow procedures by employees or contractors or as a result of actions by third parties. Like other financial services firms, we experience malicious cyber activity directed at our computer systems, software, networks and its users on a daily basis. This malicious activity includes attempts at unauthorized access, implantation of computer viruses or malware, and denial-of-service attacks. We also experience large volumes of phishing and other forms of social engineering attempted for the purpose of perpetrating fraud against the firm, our associates, our advisors or our clients. Additionally, like many large enterprises, since mid-March 2020, we have shifted the majority of our associates to remote work arrangements in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This change in our operating model has enabled us to successfully continue business operations, but also introduces potential new vulnerabilities to cyber threats. We seek to continuously monitor for and nimbly react to any and all such activity, and we develop our systems to protect our technology infrastructure and data from misuse, misappropriation or corruption.

Cyber-attacks can originate from a variety of sources, including third parties affiliated with foreign governments, organized crime or terrorist organizations. Third parties may also attempt to place individuals within our firm or induce employees, clients or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information or provide access to our data, and these types of risks may be difficult to detect or prevent. Although cybersecurity incidents among financial services firms are on the rise, we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security breaches. However, the techniques used in these attacks are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently and are often not recognized until launched. Although we seek to maintain a robust suite of authentication and layered information security controls, including our cyber threat analytics, data encryption and tokenization technologies, anti-malware defenses and vulnerability management program, any one or combination of these controls could fail to detect, mitigate or remediate these risks in a timely manner. Despite our implementation of protective measures and endeavoring to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to human error, natural disasters, power loss, spam attacks, unauthorized access, distributed denial of service attacks, computer viruses and other malicious code, and other events that could result in significant liability and damage to our reputation, and have an ongoing impact on the security and stability of our operations.

We also rely on numerous third-party service providers to conduct other aspects of our business operations, and we face similar risks relating to them. While we regularly conduct security assessments on these third-party vendors, we cannot be certain that their information security protocols are sufficient to withstand a cyber-attack or other security breach. In addition, in order to access our products and services, our customers may use computers and other devices that are beyond our security control systems.

Notwithstanding the precautions we take, if a cyber-attack or other information security breach were to occur, this could jeopardize the information we confidentially maintain, or otherwise cause interruptions in our operations or those of our clients and counterparties,

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

exposing us to liability. As attempted attacks continue to evolve in scope and sophistication, we may be required to expend substantial additional resources to modify or enhance our protective measures, to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures or to communicate about cyber-attacks to our customers. Though we have insurance against some cyber-risks and attacks, we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that exceed our policy limits or are not covered under any of our current insurance policies. A technological breakdown could also interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, exposing us to potential disciplinary action by regulators. Additionally, the SEC issued guidance in February 2018 stating that, as a public company, we are expected to have controls and procedures that relate to cybersecurity disclosure, and are required to disclose information relating to certain cyber-attacks or other information security breaches in disclosures required to be made under the federal securities laws. Further, successful cyber-attacks at other large financial institutions or other market participants, whether or not we are affected, could lead to a general loss of customer confidence in financial institutions that could negatively affect us, including harming the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures or the financial system in general, which could result in reduced use of our financial products and services.

Further, in light of the high volume of transactions we process, the large number of our clients, partners and counterparties, the increasing sophistication of malicious actors, and the COVID-19 pandemic response, a cyber-attack could occur and persist for an extended period of time without detection. We expect that any investigation of a cyber-attack would take substantial amounts of time, and that there may be extensive delays before we obtain full and reliable information. During such time we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, all of which would further increase the costs and consequences of such an attack.

We may also be subject to liability under various data protection laws. In providing services to clients, we manage, utilize and store sensitive or confidential client or employee data, including personal data. As a result, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as U.S. federal, state and international laws governing the protection of personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number. If any person, including any of our associates, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to client or employee data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates such data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution. In addition, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or employee data, whether through system failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients and related revenue. Potential liability in the event of a security breach of client data could be significant. Depending on the circumstances giving rise to the breach, this liability may not be subject to a contractual limit or an exclusion of consequential or indirect damages.

See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Operational risk” of our 2019 Form 10-K and Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk management - Operational risk” of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding our exposure to and approaches for managing operational risks.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

We did not have any sales of unregistered securities for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

We purchase our own stock from time to time in conjunction with a number of activities, each of which is described in the following paragraphs. The following table presents information on our purchases of our own stock, on a monthly basis, for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Total number of shares
purchased

Average price
per share
Number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Approximate dollar value (in millions) at each month-end, of securities that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

October 1, 2018 – October 31, 2018 469,566
$ 74.88
423,903
$182
November 1, 2018 – November 30, 2018 2,420,562
$ 77.66
2,341,466
$500
December 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 3,449,198
$ 74.55
3,287,237
$255
First quarter 6,339,326
$ 75.76
6,052,606

January 1, 2019 – January 31, 2019 13,408
$ 75.16
—
$255
February 1, 2019 – February 28, 2019 4,050
$ 82.54
—
$255
March 1, 2019 – March 31, 2019 603,529
$ 78.23
602,938
$458
Second quarter 620,987
$ 78.19
602,938

April 1, 2019 – April 30, 2019 22,241
$ 81.07
—
$458
May 1, 2019 – May 31, 2019 302,699
$ 83.53
301,756
$433
June 1, 2019 – June 30, 2019 744,251
$ 80.95
742,076
$373
Third quarter 1,069,191
$ 81.68
1,043,832

Fiscal year-to-date total 8,029,504
$ 76.74
7,699,376

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, we utilized the remainder of the previous Board authorization for repurchases of our common stock and outstanding senior notes. Accordingly, the Board approved two increases to the authorization totaling $750 million, including $500 million on November 29, 2018 and $250 million on March 1, 2019. Between July 1, 2019 and August 7, 2019, we repurchased 1.10 million shares of our common stock under this authorization at a weighted-average price of $76.60, for total consideration of $84 million. As of August 7, 2019, we had $289 million remaining under this authorization.



	Total number of shares purchased	Average price per share		Number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Approximate dollar value (in millions) at each month-end, of securities that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

October 1, 2019 – October 31, 2019	5,582	$	84.80	—	$750
November 1, 2019 – November 30, 2019	86,720	$	89.35	—	$750
December 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019	132,723	$	89.33	125,567	$739
First quarter	225,025	$	89.23	125,567

January 1, 2020 – January 31, 2020	40,106	$	89.74	32,988	$736
February 1, 2020 – February 29, 2020	721,432	$	89.47	719,250	$672
March 1, 2020 – March 31, 2020	1,800,682	$	74.94	1,795,764	$537
Second quarter	2,562,220	$	79.26	2,548,002
Fiscal year-to-date total	2,787,245	$	80.06	2,673,569

In the preceding table, the total number of shares purchased includes shares purchased pursuant to our Restricted Stock Trust Fund, which was established to acquire our common stock in the open market and used to settle RSUs granted as a retention vehicle for certain employees of our wholly owned Canadian subsidiaries. For more information on this trust fund, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K and Note 98 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q. These activities do not utilize the ~~previously described~~ repurchase ~~authority.~~authorization presented in the preceding table.

The total number of shares purchased also includes shares repurchased as a result of employees surrendering shares as payment for option exercises or withholding taxes. These activities do not utilize the ~~previously described~~ repurchase ~~authority.~~authorization presented in the preceding table.

In response to the heightened market volatility as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have suspended our share repurchases since mid-March 2020.


~~ITEM 3.~~	~~DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES~~

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.


~~ITEM 4.~~	~~MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES~~

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


~~ITEM 5.~~	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


~~ITEM 6.~~	~~EXHIBITS~~

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Financial, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of Florida on November 25, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 28, 2008.
3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of Raymond James Financial, Inc., reflecting amendments adopted by the Board of Directors on November 30, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2017.
4.1		Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2020, for the 4.650% Senior Notes due 2030, between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2020.
10.1		~~First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2019, among~~ Raymond James Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended through February 20, 2020), ~~Raymond James & Associates, Inc.,~~incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Lenders party thereto~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and ~~Bank of America, N.A.~~Exchange Commission on February 24, 2020.
31.1		Certification of Paul C. Reilly pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of ~~Jeffrey P. Julien~~Paul M. Shoukry pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32		Certification of Paul C. Reilly and ~~Jeffrey P. Julien~~Paul M. Shoukry pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document (The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.).
101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date:	~~August~~May 8, ~~2019~~2020	/s/ Paul C. Reilly
		Paul C. Reilly
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date:	~~August~~May 8, ~~2019~~2020	/s/ ~~Jeffrey P. Julien~~Paul M. Shoukry
		~~Jeffrey P. Julien~~Paul M. Shoukry
		~~Executive Vice President - Finance and~~ Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

9189



Level 3 financial instrument $ in millions	Fair value at June 30, 2019		Valuation technique(s)	Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)
Recurring measurements
Other investments - ARS preferred	$	24	Discounted cash flow	Average discount rate	5.35% - 6.35% (5.85%)
				Average interest rates applicable to future interest income on the securities ⁽¹⁾	2.31% - 2.31% (2.31%)
				Prepayment year ⁽²⁾	2019 - 2022 (2022)
	$	40	Other investment-specific events ⁽³⁾	Not meaningful ⁽³⁾	Not meaningful ⁽³⁾
Private equity investments (not measured at NAV)	$	46	Income approach - discounted cash flow	Discount rate	25	%
				Terminal EBITDA multiple	10.0x
				Terminal year	2022 - 2042 (2023)
	$	13	Transaction price or other investment-specific events ⁽⁴⁾	Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾	Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾



Level 3 financial instrument $ in millions	Fair value at September 30, 2018		Valuation technique(s)	Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)
Recurring measurements
ARS preferred	$	67	Discounted cash flow	Average discount rate	6.50% - 7.85% (7.13%)
				Average interest rates applicable to future interest income on the securities ⁽¹⁾	4.13% - 5.51% (4.47%)
				Prepayment year ⁽²⁾	2018 - 2021 (2021)
Private equity investments (not measured at NAV)	$	43	Income approach - discounted cash flow	Discount rate	25	%
				Terminal EBITDA multiple	10.0x
				Terminal year	2022 - 2042 (2023)
	$	13	Transaction price or other investment-specific events ⁽⁴⁾	Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾	Not meaningful ⁽⁴⁾