UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017


o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-31371

Oshkosh Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Wisconsin		39-0520270
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



P.O. Box 2566 Oshkosh, Wisconsin		54903-2566
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (920) 235-9151

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
		Smaller reporting company o
		Emerging growth Company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes ý No

As of April ~~21, 2016, 73,366,717~~19, 2017, 74,794,526 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q INDEX

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, ~~2016~~2017



		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)	1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the	1
	Three Months and Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the	2
	Three Months and Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at	3
	March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015~~2016

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the	4
	Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the	5
	Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	32

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	4344

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	4344

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	4446

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	4446

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	47

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	4847

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	4948

SIGNATURES		5049

EXHIBIT INDEX		5150

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net sales	$	1,524.3		$	1,554.2		$	2,776.3		$	2,907.5		$	1,618.3		$	1,524.3		$	2,829.7		$	2,776.3
Cost of sales	1,265.0			1,278.4			2,334.2			2,402.0			1,357.0			1,265.0			2,368.7			2,334.2
Gross income	259.3			275.8			442.1			505.5			261.3			259.3			461.0			442.1

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	154.7			152.8			294.0			303.3			169.8			154.7			320.8			294.0
Amortization of purchased intangibles	13.2			13.3			26.4			26.8			11.1			13.2			23.6			26.4
Total operating expenses	167.9			166.1			320.4			330.1			180.9			167.9			344.4			320.4
Operating income	91.4			109.7			121.7			175.4			80.4			91.4			116.6			121.7

Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(15.6		)	(28.8		)	(30.2		)	(43.2		)	(15.1		)	(15.6		)	(29.8		)	(30.2		)
Interest income	0.5			0.6			1.0			1.4			1.0			0.5			1.8			1.0
Miscellaneous, net	(1.0		)	1.3			(1.0		)	—			1.2			(1.0		)	2.5			(1.0		)
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	75.3			82.8			91.5			133.6			67.5			75.3			91.1			91.5
Provision for income taxes	20.3			29.5			22.0			45.7			23.6			20.3			28.8			22.0
Income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	55.0			53.3			69.5			87.9			43.9			55.0			62.3			69.5
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	1.1			1.3			1.2			1.4			0.4			1.1			1.2			1.2
Net income	$	56.1		$	54.6		$	70.7		$	89.3		$	44.3		$	56.1		$	63.5		$	70.7

Earnings per share attributable to common shareholders:
Basic	$	0.77		$	0.70		$	0.96		$	1.14		$	0.59		$	0.77		$	0.85		$	0.96
Diluted	0.76			0.69			0.95			1.12			0.58			0.76			0.84			0.95

Cash dividends declared per share on Common Stock	$	0.19		$	0.17		$	0.38		$	0.34		0.21			0.19			0.42			0.38

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions; unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended March 31,					Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016		2015			2017		2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	56.1		$	54.6		$	70.7	$	89.3		$	44.3	$	56.1		$	63.5		$	70.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Employee pension and postretirement benefits	0.4			0.5			0.9		0.3			0.8		0.4			1.6			0.9
Currency translation adjustments	18.9			(53.1		)	7.7		(76.0		)	10.7		18.9			(19.7		)	7.7
Change in fair value of derivative instruments	(0.2		)	—			—		—			—		(0.2		)	—			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	19.1			(52.6		)	8.6		(75.7		)	11.5		19.1			(18.1		)	8.6
Comprehensive income	$	75.2		$	2.0		$	79.3	$	13.6		$	55.8	$	75.2		$	45.4		$	79.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share and per share amounts; unaudited)


	March 31,			September 30,			March 31,			September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38.4		$	42.9		$	413.4		$	321.9
Receivables, net	1,046.0			964.6			945.1			1,021.9
Inventories, net	1,373.4			1,301.7			1,455.1			979.8
Deferred income taxes, net	54.5			52.2
Prepaid income taxes	23.9			22.8
Other current assets	54.0			45.1			90.1			93.9
Total current assets	2,590.2			2,429.3			2,903.7			2,417.5
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates	16.8			16.2
Property, plant and equipment, net	478.3			475.8			445.7			452.1
Goodwill	1,006.0			1,001.1			994.4			1,003.5
Purchased intangible assets, net	580.2			606.7			529.7			553.5
Other long-term assets	79.7			83.9			115.3			87.2
Total assets	$	4,751.2		$	4,613.0		$	4,988.8		$	4,513.8

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Revolving credit facilities and current maturities of long-term debt	$	155.7		$	83.5		$	10.0		$	20.0
Accounts payable	597.7			552.8			694.6			466.1
Customer advances	525.9			440.2			672.0			471.8
Payroll-related obligations	123.6			116.6			143.3			147.9
Other current liabilities	241.6			265.0			273.4			261.8
Total current liabilities	1,644.5			1,458.1			1,793.3			1,367.6
Long-term debt, less current maturities	845.0			855.0			817.1			826.2
Deferred income taxes, net	88.6			91.7
Other long-term liabilities	298.7			297.1			345.1			343.5
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred Stock ($.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding)	—			—			—			—
Common Stock ($.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 92,101,465 shares issued)	0.9			0.9			0.9			0.9
Additional paid-in capital	779.5			771.5			794.2			782.3
Retained earnings	2,059.2			2,016.5			2,209.2			2,177.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(135.8		)	(144.4		)	(193.1		)	(175.0		)
Common Stock in treasury, at cost (18,951,082 and 16,647,031 shares, respectively)	(829.4		)	(733.4		)
Common Stock in treasury, at cost (17,306,939 and 18,175,669 shares, respectively)							(777.9		)	(808.7		)
Total shareholders’ equity	1,874.4			1,911.1			2,033.3			1,976.5
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	4,751.2		$	4,613.0		$	4,988.8		$	4,513.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Common Stock in Treasury at Cost			Total
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	0.9	$	758.0		$	1,840.1		$	(69.2	)	$	(544.8	)	$	1,985.0
Net income	—		—			89.3			—			—			89.3
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0.2	—		—			—			0.3			—			0.3
Currency translation adjustments, net	—		—			—			(76.0		)	—			(76.0		)
Cash dividends ($0.34 per share)	—		—			(26.7		)	—			—			(26.7		)
Repurchases of Common Stock	—		—			—			—			(88.1		)	(88.1		)
Exercise of stock options	—		(0.3		)	—			—			3.7			3.4
Stock-based compensation expense	—		11.4			—			—			—			11.4
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	—		4.0			—			—			—			4.0
Payment of earned performance shares	—		(7.4		)	—			—			7.4			—
Shares tendered for taxes on stock-based compensation	—		—			—			—			(4.8		)	(4.8		)
Other	—		(0.4		)	—			—			0.6			0.2
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	0.9	$	765.3		$	1,902.7		$	(144.9	)	$	(626.0	)	$	1,898.0

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Common Stock in Treasury at Cost			Total			Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Common Stock in Treasury, at Cost			Total
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	0.9	$	771.5		$	2,016.5		$	(144.4	)	$	(733.4	)	$	1,911.1		$	0.9	$	771.5		$	2,016.5		$	(144.4	)	$	(733.4	)	$	1,911.1
Net income	—		—			70.7			—			—			70.7			—		—			70.7			—			—			70.7
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0.6	—		—			—			0.9			—			0.9			—		—			—			0.9			—			0.9
Currency translation adjustments, net	—		—			—			7.7			—			7.7
Currency translation adjustments																		—		—			—			7.7			—			7.7
Cash dividends ($0.38 per share)	—		—			(28.0		)	—			—			(28.0		)	—		—			(28.0		)	—			—			(28.0		)
Repurchases of Common Stock	—		—			—			—			(100.1		)	(100.1		)	—		—			—			—			(100.1		)	(100.1		)
Exercise of stock options	—		(0.3		)	—			—			2.2			1.9			—		(0.3		)	—			—			2.2			1.9
Stock-based compensation expense	—		11.4			—			—			—			11.4			—		11.4			—			—			—			11.4
Payment of earned performance shares	—		(2.6		)	—			—			2.6			—			—		(2.6		)	—			—			2.6			—
Shares tendered for taxes on stock-based compensation	—		—			—			—			(1.5		)	(1.5		)	—		—			—			—			(1.5		)	(1.5		)
Other	—		(0.5		)	—			—			0.8			0.3			—		(0.5		)	—			—			0.8			0.3
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	0.9	$	779.5		$	2,059.2		$	(135.8	)	$	(829.4	)	$	1,874.4		$	0.9	$	779.5		$	2,059.2		$	(135.8	)	$	(829.4	)	$	1,874.4

																		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Common Stock in Treasury, at Cost			Total
Balance at September 30, 2016																		$	0.9	$	782.3		$	2,177.0		$	(175.0	)	$	(808.7	)	$	1,976.5
Net income																		—		—			63.5			—			—			63.5
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0.9																		—		—			—			1.6			—			1.6
Currency translation adjustments																		—		—			—			(19.7		)	—			(19.7		)
Cash dividends ($0.42 per share)																		—		—			(31.3		)	—			—			(31.3		)
Exercise of stock options																		—		4.3			—			—			28.9			33.2
Stock-based compensation expense																		—		12.2			—			—			—			12.2
Payment of earned performance shares																		—		(1.3		)	—			—			1.3			—
Shares tendered for taxes on stock-based compensation																		—		—			—			—			(3.0		)	(3.0		)
Other																		—		(3.3		)	—			—			3.6			0.3
Balance at March 31, 2017																		$	0.9	$	794.2		$	2,209.2		$	(193.1	)	$	(777.9	)	$	2,033.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions; unaudited)


	Six Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Operating activities:
Net income	$	70.7		$	89.3		$	63.5		$	70.7
Depreciation and amortization	63.7			64.0			64.4			63.7
Stock-based compensation expense	11.4			11.4			12.2			11.4
Deferred income taxes	(7.0		)	(4.7		)	1.0			(7.0		)
Gain on sale of assets							(4.2		)	(6.3		)
Foreign currency transaction losses	0.3			10.7			0.2			0.3
Gain on sale of assets	(6.3		)	(5.0		)
Other non-cash adjustments	(0.2		)	12.8			0.5			(0.2		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	(38.1		)	(249.2		)	10.5			(36.6		)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	94.5			(70.7		)
Net cash provided by operating activities							148.1			96.0

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(40.3		)	(69.8		)	(28.0		)	(40.3		)
Additions to equipment held for rental	(22.7		)	(15.5		)	(24.6		)	(22.7		)
Proceeds from sale of equipment held for rental	26.1			13.4			19.8			26.1
Other investing activities	(1.0		)	(1.5		)	(0.9		)	(1.0		)
Net cash used by investing activities	(37.9		)	(73.4		)	(33.7		)	(37.9		)

Financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt	(21.3		)	13.7
Proceeds from issuance of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	273.5			315.0			—			273.5
Repayment of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	(190.0		)	(325.0		)
Repayments of debt (original maturities greater than three months)							(20.0		)	(190.0		)
Net decrease in short-term debt							—			(21.3		)
Repurchases of Common Stock	(100.1		)	(88.1		)	(3.0		)	(101.6		)
Dividends paid	(28.0		)	(26.7		)	(31.3		)	(28.0		)
Debt issuance costs	—			(15.4		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	1.9			3.4			33.2			1.9
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	0.9			4.1			—			0.9
Net cash used by financing activities	(63.1		)	(119.0		)	(21.1		)	(64.6		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	2.0			2.7			(1.8		)	2.0
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(4.5		)	(260.4		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							91.5			(4.5		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	42.9			313.8			321.9			42.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	38.4		$	53.4		$	413.4		$	38.4

Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	$	26.6		$	27.0		$	28.4		$	26.6
Cash paid for income taxes	37.3			23.5			22.2			37.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments, unless otherwise noted) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ~~("U.S. GAAP")~~(U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oshkosh Corporation for the year ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. “Oshkosh” refers to Oshkosh Corporation not including its subsidiaries and “the Company” refers to Oshkosh Corporation and its subsidiaries. Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal ~~2015~~2016 financial statements to conform to the fiscal ~~2016~~2017 presentation.

2. New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(“FASB”)~~(FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update ~~(“ASU”)~~(ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and the FASB has since issued several amendments to this standard, which ~~clarifies~~clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. This guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard supersedes all existing U.S. GAAP guidance on revenue recognition and is expected to require the use of more judgment and result in additional disclosures. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2014-09 as ~~amended by ASU 2015-14,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral~~ of ~~the Effective Date,~~ ~~ASU 2016-08,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations~~ ~~and ASU 2016-10,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,~~ ~~becomes effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with adoption permitted one year earlier.~~October 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s financial statements and has not yet determined its method of adoption.

~~In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03,~~ ~~Interest - Imputation of Interest (Topic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs~~. ASU 2015-03 is part of the FASB’s initiative to simplify accounting standards. The guidance requires an entity to recognize debt issuance costs related to a debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability in the balance sheet, thereby increasing the effective rate of interest, as opposed to a deferred cost. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2015-03 as of October 1, 2016. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 is part of the FASB’s initiative to simplify accounting standards. The guidance requires an entity to recognize inventory within the scope of the standard at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2015-11 as of October 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2015-11 on the Company’s financial statements.

In ~~November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.~~ ASU 2015-17 is part of the FASB's initiative to reduce complexity of financial statements. The guidance removes the requirement to separate and classify deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts and requires an entity to classify all deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2015-17 as of October 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-17 to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which is expected to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. The standard requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as lease liabilities with a corresponding right-of-use asset, while leaving presentation of lease expense in the ~~statements~~statement of ~~comprehensive~~ income largely unchanged. The standard also eliminates the real-estate specific provisions that exist under current U.S. GAAP and modifies the classification criteria and accounting lessors must apply to sales-type and direct financing leases. The standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company's financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 is part of the FASB’s initiative to simplify accounting standards. The standard requires that all tax effects of share-based payments at settlement (or expiration) be recorded in the income statement at the time the tax effects arise. The standard also clarifies that cash flows resulting from share-based payments be reported as operating activities within the statement of cash flows, permits employers to withhold shares upon settlement of an award to satisfy an employee's tax liability up to the employee's maximum individual tax rate in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in liability classification of the award and permits entities to make an accounting policy election to estimate or use actual forfeitures when recognizing the expense of share-based compensation. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 as of October 1, 2016 following a prospective approach for the income tax and earnings per share impacts and a retrospective approach for the cash flow impacts. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The standard requires a change in the measurement approach for credit losses on financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis from an incurred loss method to an expected loss method, thereby eliminating the requirement that a credit loss be considered probable to impact the valuation of a financial asset measured on an amortized cost basis. The standard requires the measurement of expected credit losses to be based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and a reasonable and supportable forecast that affects the collectibility of the related financial asset. The Company will be required to adopt ASU ~~2016-09~~2016-13 as of October 1, ~~2017.~~2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU ~~2016-09~~2016-13 on the Company's financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The standard requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset when the transfer occurs as opposed to when the asset is transferred to an outside party as required under current U.S. GAAP. The standard does not apply to intra-entity transfers of inventory, which will continue to follow current U.S. GAAP. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2016-16 as of October 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-16 on the Company's financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The standard simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement that an entity compute the implied fair value of goodwill based on the fair values of its assets and liabilities to measure impairment. Instead, goodwill impairment will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit and the carrying value of the reporting unit. The standard also clarifies the treatment of the income tax effect of tax deductible goodwill when measuring goodwill impairment loss. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2017-04 as of October 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2017-04 on the Company's financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The standard requires that an entity report the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The remaining components of net benefit costs are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. The amendment further allows only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement costs to be eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2017-07 as of October 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2017-07 on the Company's financial statements.

3. Receivables

Receivables consisted of the following (in millions):

March 31, September 30,
2016 2015
U.S. government:
Amounts billed $ 38.6
$ 63.1
Costs and profits not billed 34.0
66.8
72.6
129.9
Other trade receivables 941.8
782.3
Finance receivables 6.5
7.4
Notes receivable 33.0
29.6
Other receivables 35.4
57.7
1,089.3
1,006.9
Less allowance for doubtful accounts (21.9 ) (20.3 )
$ 1,067.4
$ 986.6

~~Classification of receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following (in millions):~~

March 31, September 30,
2016 2015
Current receivables $ 1,046.0
$ 964.6
Long-term receivables (included in Other long-term assets) 21.4
22.0
$ 1,067.4
$ 986.6



	March 31,			September 30,
	2017			2016
U.S. government:
Amounts billed	$	59.9		$	49.0
Costs and profits not billed	85.1			55.3
	145.0			104.3
Other trade receivables	754.9			881.8
Finance receivables	44.8			7.6
Notes receivable	34.6			36.1
Other receivables	39.9			38.6
	1,019.2			1,068.4
Less allowance for doubtful accounts	(19.5		)	(21.2		)
	$	999.7		$	1,047.2

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Classification of receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following (in millions):



	March 31,		September 30,
	2017		2016
Current receivables	$	945.1	$	1,021.9
Long-term receivables (included in “Other long-term assets”)	54.6		25.3
	$	999.7	$	1,047.2

Finance and notes receivable aging and accrual status consisted of the following (in millions):


	Finance Receivables						Notes Receivable						Finance Receivables						Notes Receivable
	March 31, 2016			September 30, 2015			March 31, 2016			September 30, 2015			March 31, 2017			September 30, 2016			March 31, 2017			September 30, 2016
Aging of receivables that are past due:
Greater than 30 days and less than 60 days	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Greater than 60 days and less than 90 days	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Greater than 90 days	—			—			—			—			2.4			2.9			0.2			—

Receivables on nonaccrual status	1.1			1.1			22.2			22.9			4.3			4.5			23.2			25.1
Receivables past due 90 days or more and still accruing	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Receivables subject to general reserves	1.5			6.2			—			—			2.4			3.1			—			—
Allowance for doubtful accounts	—			(0.1		)	—			—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)	—			—
Receivables subject to specific reserves	5.0			1.2			33.0			29.6			42.4			4.5			34.6			36.1
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(0.4		)	—			(13.2		)	(12.7		)	(2.4		)	(0.9		)	(11.3		)	(13.0		)

Finance Receivables: Finance receivables represent sales-type leases resulting from the sale of the Company's products and the purchase of finance receivables from lenders pursuant to customer defaults under program agreements with finance companies. Finance receivables originated by the Company generally include a residual value component. Residual values are determined based on the expectation that the underlying equipment will have a minimum fair market value at the end of the lease term. This residual value accrues to the Company at the end of the lease. The Company uses its experience and knowledge as an original equipment manufacturer and participant in end markets for the related products along with third-party studies to estimate residual values. The Company monitors these values for impairment on a periodic basis and reflects any resulting reductions in value in current earnings.

Delinquency is the primary indicator of credit quality of finance receivables. The Company maintains a general allowance for finance receivables considered doubtful of future collection based upon historical experience. Additional allowances are established based upon the Company’s perception of the quality of the finance receivables, including the length of time the receivables are past due, past experience of ~~collectability~~collectibility and underlying economic conditions. In circumstances where the Company believes ~~collectability~~collectibility is no longer reasonably assured, a specific allowance is recorded to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. Finance receivables are written off if management determines that the specific borrower does not have the ability to repay the loan amounts due in full. The terms of the finance agreements generally give the Company the ability to take possession of the underlying collateral. The Company may incur losses in excess of recorded allowances if the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate or the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale of the collateral supporting its customers’ financial obligations is not realized.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Notes Receivable: Notes receivable include amounts related to refinancing of trade accounts and finance receivables. As of March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately ~~71%~~88% of the notes receivable balance outstanding was due from ~~three~~four parties. The Company routinely evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and establishes reserves where the Company believes ~~collectability~~collectibility is no longer reasonably assured. Certain notes receivable are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets and/or other assets owned by the debtor. The Company may incur losses in excess of recorded allowances if the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate or the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale of the collateral supporting its customers' financial obligations is not realized.

Quality of Finance and Notes Receivable: The Company does not accrue interest income on finance and notes receivable in circumstances where the Company believes ~~collectability~~collectibility is no longer reasonably assured. Any cash payments received on nonaccrual finance and notes receivable are applied first to the principal balances. The Company does not resume accrual of interest income until the customer has shown that it is capable of meeting its financial obligations by making timely payments over a sustained period of time. The Company determines past due or delinquency status based upon the due date of the receivable.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Receivables subject to specific reserves also include loans that the Company has modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to customers experiencing financial difficulty. To minimize the economic loss, the Company may modify certain finance and notes receivable. Modifications generally consist of restructured payment terms and time frames in which no payments are required. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, restructured finance and notes receivables were ~~$0.4~~$3.4 million and ~~$14.7~~$11.3 million, respectively. Losses on troubled debt restructurings were not significant during the three and six months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

Changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts by type of receivable were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016										Three Months Ended March 31, 2015											Three Months Ended March 31, 2017											Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Finance		Notes		Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes			Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes			Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes		Trade and Other			Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts at beginning of period	$	0.1	$	12.6	$	6.1		$	18.8		$	—	$	13.1		$	8.1		$	21.2		$	2.1	$	11.6		$	6.5		$	20.2		$	0.1	$	12.6	$	6.1		$	18.8
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries	0.3		0.1		2.3			2.7			—		0.1			1.4			1.5			0.4		(0.1		)	0.1			0.4			0.3		0.1		2.3			2.7
Charge-off of accounts	—		—		(0.1		)	(0.1		)	—		—			(0.3		)	(0.3		)	—		(0.4		)	(0.8		)	(1.2		)	—		—		(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Foreign currency translation	—		0.5		—			0.5			—		(1.1		)	(0.1		)	(1.2		)	—		0.2			(0.1		)	0.1			—		0.5		—			0.5
Allowance for doubtful accounts at end of period	$	0.4	$	13.2	$	8.3		$	21.9		$	—	$	12.1		$	9.1		$	21.2		$	2.5	$	11.3		$	5.7		$	19.5		$	0.4	$	13.2	$	8.3		$	21.9


	Six Months Ended March 31, 2016										Six Months Ended March 31, 2015											Six Months Ended March 31, 2017											Six Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Finance		Notes		Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes			Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes			Trade and Other			Total			Finance		Notes		Trade and Other			Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts at beginning of period	$	0.1	$	12.7	$	7.5		$	20.3		$	—	$	13.6		$	8.2		$	21.8		$	1.0	$	13.0		$	7.2		$	21.2		$	0.1	$	12.7	$	7.5		$	20.3
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries	0.3		0.3		1.2			1.8			—		0.1			1.2			1.3			1.5		(0.7		)	(0.4		)	0.4			0.3		0.3		1.2			1.8
Charge-off of accounts	—		—		(0.4		)	(0.4		)	—		—			(0.2		)	(0.2		)	—		(0.5		)	(1.0		)	(1.5		)	—		—		(0.4		)	(0.4		)
Foreign currency translation	—		0.2		—			0.2			—		(1.6		)	(0.1		)	(1.7		)	—		(0.5		)	(0.1		)	(0.6		)	—		0.2		—			0.2
Allowance for doubtful accounts at end of period	$	0.4	$	13.2	$	8.3		$	21.9		$	—	$	12.1		$	9.1		$	21.2		$	2.5	$	11.3		$	5.7		$	19.5		$	0.4	$	13.2	$	8.3		$	21.9

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

4. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):


	March 31,			September 30,			March 31,			September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Raw materials	$	576.5		$	532.1		$	597.9		$	481.2
Partially finished products	360.1			266.3			442.6			307.8
Finished products	539.4			594.4			503.6			286.9
Inventories at FIFO cost	1,476.0			1,392.8			1,544.1			1,075.9
Less: Progress/performance-based payments on U.S. government contracts	(23.2		)	(12.9		)	(8.0		)	(17.8		)
Excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost	(79.4		)	(78.2		)	(81.0		)	(78.3		)
	$	1,373.4		$	1,301.7		$	1,455.1		$	979.8

Title to all inventories related to U.S. government contracts, which provide for progress or performance-based payments, vests with the U.S. government to the extent of unliquidated progress or performance-based payments.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

5. ~~Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates~~

~~Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for under the equity method and consisted of the following (in millions):~~

March 31, September 30,
2016 2015
Mezcladoras (Mexico) $ 11.6
$ 10.6
RiRent (The Netherlands) 5.2
5.8
Other investments in unconsolidated affiliates —
(0.2 )
$ 16.8
$ 16.2

Recorded investments generally represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company’s ownership interest. Earnings or losses are reflected in “Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company and an unaffiliated third party are joint venture partners in Mezcladoras Y Trailers de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“Mezcladoras”). Mezcladoras is a manufacturer and distributor of industrial and commercial machinery with primary operations in Mexico. The Company recognized sales to Mezcladoras of $2.0 million and $6.3 million during the six months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognizes income on sales to Mezcladoras at the time of shipment in proportion to the outside third-party interest in Mezcladoras and recognizes the remaining income upon the joint venture's sale of inventory to an unaffiliated customer. The Company earns a service fee for certain operational support services provided to Mezcladoras. The Company recognized service fees of $0.6 million for each of the six months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

The Company and an unaffiliated third party are joint venture partners in RiRent Europe BV (“RiRent”). RiRent maintains a fleet of access equipment for short-term lease to rental companies throughout most of Europe. The re-rental fleet provides rental companies with equipment to support requirements on short notice. RiRent does not provide services directly to end users. The Company and its joint venture partner are in the process of winding down RiRent. To the extent that RiRent has existing outstanding contracts, those contracts will continue to be maintained. The Company received dividends of €0.9 million ($1.0 million) and €2.3 million ($2.8 million) from RiRent during the six months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

6. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in millions):


	March 31,			September 30,			March 31,			September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Land and land improvements	$	57.6		$	57.5		$	57.8		$	56.8
Buildings	279.1			274.8			286.3			283.4
Machinery and equipment	713.0			681.1			605.7			597.3
Software and related costs							150.8			147.4
Equipment on operating lease to others	41.6			42.2			34.4			25.7
Construction in progress	30.5			38.1
	1,121.8			1,093.7			1,135.0			1,110.6
Less accumulated depreciation	(643.5		)	(617.9		)	(689.3		)	(658.5		)
	$	478.3		$	475.8		$	445.7		$	452.1

Depreciation expense was ~~$18.7~~$20.4 million and ~~$16.2~~$18.7 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Depreciation expense was ~~$35.8~~$39.3 million and ~~$32.3~~$35.8 million for the six months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Capitalized interest was insignificant for all reported periods.

Equipment on operating lease to others represents the cost of equipment shipped to customers for whom the Company has guaranteed the residual value and equipment on short-term leases. These transactions are accounted for as operating leases with

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

the related assets capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic lives of five to ten years. Cost less accumulated depreciation for equipment on operating lease at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$33.8~~$26.8 million and ~~$33.9~~$18.6 million,, respectively.

7.6. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if potential interim indicators exist that could result in impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents changes in goodwill during the six months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 (in millions):

Access
Equipment

Fire &
Emergency
Commercial Total
Net goodwill at September 30, 2015 $ 874.2
$ 106.1
$ 20.8
$ 1,001.1
Foreign currency translation 4.8
—
0.1
4.9
Net goodwill at March 31, 2016 $ 879.0
$ 106.1
$ 20.9
$ 1,006.0



	Access Equipment			Fire & Emergency		Commercial		Total
Net goodwill at September 30, 2016	$	876.6		$	106.1	$	20.8	$	1,003.5
Foreign currency translation	(9.1		)	—		—		(9.1		)
Net goodwill at March 31, 2017	$	867.5		$	106.1	$	20.8	$	994.4

The following table presents details of the Company’s goodwill allocated to the reportable segments (in millions):


	March 31, 2016							September 30, 2015							March 31, 2017							September 30, 2016
	Gross		Accumulated Impairment			Net		Gross		Accumulated Impairment			Net		Gross		Accumulated Impairment			Net		Gross		Accumulated Impairment			Net
Access equipment	$	1,811.1	$	(932.1	)	$	879.0	$	1,806.3	$	(932.1	)	$	874.2	$	1,799.6	$	(932.1	)	$	867.5	$	1,808.7	$	(932.1	)	$	876.6
Fire & emergency	108.1		(2.0		)	106.1		108.1		(2.0		)	106.1		108.1		(2.0		)	106.1		108.1		(2.0		)	106.1
Commercial	196.8		(175.9		)	20.9		196.7		(175.9		)	20.8		196.7		(175.9		)	20.8		196.7		(175.9		)	20.8
	$	2,116.0	$	(1,110.0	)	$	1,006.0	$	2,111.1	$	(1,110.0	)	$	1,001.1	$	2,104.4	$	(1,110.0	)	$	994.4	$	2,113.5	$	(1,110.0	)	$	1,003.5

Details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets are as follows (in millions):


	March 31, 2016								March 31, 2017
	Weighted- Average Life (in years)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Weighted- Average Life (in years)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
Distribution network	39.1	$	55.4	$	(27.3	)	$	28.1	39.1	$	55.4	$	(28.7	)	$	26.7
Non-compete	10.5	56.4		(56.4		)	—
Technology-related	11.9	104.8		(87.5		)	17.3		11.9	104.7		(95.7		)	9.0
Customer relationships	12.8	552.0		(407.0		)	145.0		12.8	546.6		(442.0		)	104.6
Other	16.4	16.5		(14.5		)	2.0		16.2	16.4		(14.7		)	1.7
	14.5	785.1		(592.7		)	192.4		14.8	723.1		(581.1		)	142.0
Non-amortizable trade names		387.8		—			387.8			387.7		—			387.7
		$	1,172.9	$	(592.7	)	$	580.2		$	1,110.8	$	(581.1	)	$	529.7



	September 30, 2016
	Weighted- Average Life (in years)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
Distribution network	39.1	$	55.4	$	(28.0	)	$	27.4
Technology-related	11.9	104.7		(91.5		)	13.2
Customer relationships	12.8	550.8		(427.4		)	123.4
Other	16.3	16.5		(14.7		)	1.8
	14.5	727.4		(561.6		)	165.8
Non-amortizable trade names		387.7		—			387.7
		$	1,115.1	$	(561.6	)	$	553.5

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2017 and the five years succeeding September 30, 2017 are as follows: 2017 (remaining six months) - $22.2 million; 2018 - $38.3 million; 2019 - $36.9 million; 2020 - $11.0 million; 2021 - $5.3 million; and 2022 - $4.9 million.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

September 30, 2015

Weighted-
Average
Life (in years)
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
Distribution network 39.1 $ 55.4
$ (26.6 ) $ 28.8
Non-compete 10.5 56.4
(56.3 ) 0.1
Technology-related 11.9 104.8
(83.3 ) 21.5
Customer relationships 12.8 550.3
(384.0 ) 166.3
Other 16.5 16.5
(14.3 ) 2.2
14.5 783.4
(564.5 ) 218.9
Non-amortizable trade names 387.8
—
387.8
$ 1,171.2
$ (564.5 ) $ 606.7

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2016 and the five years succeeding September 30, 2016 are as follows: 2016 (remaining six months) - $26.2 million; 2017 - $45.8 million; 2018 - $38.3 million; 2019 - $36.9 million; 2020 - $11.0 million and 2021 - $5.3 million.

8.7. Credit Agreements

The Company was obligated under the following debt instruments (in millions):


	March 31,			September 30,			March 31, 2017
	2016			2015			Principal		Debt Issuance Costs			Debt, Net
Senior Secured Term Loan	$	365.0		$	375.0		$	335.0	$	(1.1	)	$	333.9
5.375% Senior Notes due March 2022	250.0			250.0			250.0		(3.9		)	246.1
5.375% Senior Notes due March 2025	250.0			250.0			250.0		(2.9		)	247.1
	865.0			875.0			$	835.0	$	(7.9	)	827.1
Less current maturities	(20.0		)	(20.0		)						(10.0		)
	$	845.0		$	855.0							$	817.1

Revolving Credit Facility	$	132.2		$	63.5							$	—
Other short-term borrowings	3.5			—
Current maturities of long-term debt	20.0			20.0								10.0
	$	155.7		$	83.5							$	10.0



	September 30, 2016
	Principal		Debt Issuance Costs			Debt, Net
Senior Secured Term Loan	$	355.0	$	(1.4	)	$	353.6
5.375% Senior Notes due March 2022	250.0		(4.3		)	245.7
5.375% Senior Notes due March 2025	250.0		(3.1		)	246.9
	$	855.0	$	(8.8	)	846.2
Less current maturities						(20.0		)
						$	826.2

Revolving Credit Facility						$	—
Current maturities of long-term debt						20.0
						$	20.0

In March 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with various lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a revolving credit facility ~~(“Revolving~~(Revolving Credit ~~Facility”)~~Facility) that matures in March 2019 with an initial maximum aggregate amount of availability of $600 million and (ii) a $400 million term loan ~~(“Term Loan”)~~(Term Loan) due in quarterly principal installments of ~~$5.0~~$5 million with a balloon payment of ~~$310.0~~$310 million due at maturity in March 2019. During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company prepaid all quarterly principal installments required during fiscal 2017. In January 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with lenders under the Credit Agreement that increased the Revolving Credit Facility to an aggregate maximum amount of $850 million. At March 31, ~~2016, borrowings~~2017, there was no outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit ~~Facility of $132.2 million and~~Facility. At March 31, 2017, outstanding letters of credit of ~~$113.0~~$100.5 million reduced available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to ~~$604.8~~$749.5 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of its domestic subsidiaries, and the Company will guarantee the obligations of certain of its subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement is collateralized by (i) a first-priority perfected lien and security interests in substantially all of the personal property of the Company, each material subsidiary of the Company and each subsidiary guarantor, (ii) mortgages upon certain real property of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries and (iii) a pledge of the equity of each material subsidiary of the Company.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under the Credit Agreement, the Company must pay (i) an unused commitment fee ranging from 0.225% to 0.35% per annum of the average daily unused portion of the aggregate revolving credit commitments under the Credit Agreement and (ii) a fee ranging from 0.625% to 2.00% per annum of the maximum amount available to be drawn for each letter of credit issued and outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to (i) LIBOR plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied, or (ii) for dollar-denominated loans only, the base rate (which is the highest of (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (c) the sum of 1% plus one-month LIBOR) plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the interest spread on the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan was 150 basis points. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under ~~both~~ the ~~Revolving Credit Facility and~~ Term Loan was 2.29% at March 31, ~~2016 was 1.94%.~~2017.

The Credit Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants, including requirements that the Company maintain certain financial ratios at prescribed levels and restrictions, subject to certain exceptions, on the ability of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions and make investments in joint ventures and foreign subsidiaries.

The Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

Leverage Ratio: A maximum leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated indebtedness to consolidated net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash charges and certain other items ~~(“EBITDA”)~~(EBITDA)) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 4.50 to ~~1.00~~.

1.00.

Interest Coverage Ratio: A minimum interest coverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated EBITDA to the Company’s consolidated cash interest expense) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 2.50 to ~~1.00~~.

1.00.

Senior Secured Leverage Ratio: A maximum senior secured leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated secured indebtedness to the Company’s consolidated EBITDA) of 3.00 to 1.00.

With certain exceptions, the Company may elect to have the collateral pledged in connection with the Credit Agreement released during any period that the Company maintains an investment grade corporate family rating from either Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group or Moody’s Investor Service Inc. During any such period when the collateral has been released, the Company’s leverage ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter must not be greater than 3.75 to 1.00,, and the Company would not be subject to any additional requirement to limit its senior secured leverage ratio.

The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as of March 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Additionally, with certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement limits the ability of the Company to pay dividends and other distributions, including repurchases of shares of its Common Stock. However, so long as no event of default exists under the Credit Agreement or would result from such payment, the Company may pay dividends and other distributions after March 3, 2010 in an aggregate amount not exceeding the sum of:


i.	50% of the consolidated net income of the Company and its subsidiaries (or if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), accrued on a cumulative basis during the period beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of the applicable proposed dividend or distribution; and


ii.	100% of the aggregate net proceeds received by the Company subsequent to March 3, 2010 either as a contribution to its common equity capital or from the issuance and sale of its Common Stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In February 2014, the Company issued $250.0 million of 5.375% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”). In March 2015, the Company issued $250.0 million of 5.375% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”). The ~~proceeds of both notes were used to repay existing outstanding notes of the Company. The~~ Company has the option to redeem the 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes for a premium after March 1, 2017 and March 1, 2020, respectively.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes were issued pursuant to separate indentures (the “Indentures”) among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and a trustee. The Indentures contain customary affirmative and negative covenants. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally guarantee the Company’s obligations under the 2022 Senior Notes and 2025 Senior Notes. See Note 21 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for separate financial information of the subsidiary guarantors.

In October 2015, the Company entered into a 63.0 million Chinese renminbi uncommitted line of credit to provide short-term finance support to operations in China. There was 22.8 million Chinese renminbi ($3.5 million) outstanding on the uncommitted line of credit at March 31, 2016. The uncommitted line of credit carries a variable interest rate that is set by the lender, which was 4.35% at March 31, 2016.

The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based upon Level 2 inputs to reflect market rate of the Company’s debt. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the fair value of the 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes was estimated to be ~~$254~~$260 million ($262 million at September 30, 2016) and ~~$250~~$257 million ~~respectively, and the~~($263 million at September 30, 2016), respectively. The fair value of the Term Loan approximated book ~~value. At~~value at both March 31, 2017 and September 30, ~~2015, the fair value of the 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes was estimated to be $252 million and $249 million, respectively, and the fair value of the Term Loan approximated book value.~~2016. See Note 1312 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the definition of a Level 2 input.

9.8. Warranties

The Company’s products generally carry explicit warranties that extend from six months to five years, based on terms that are generally accepted in the marketplace. Selected components (such as engines, transmissions, tires, etc.) included in the Company’s end products may include manufacturers’ warranties. These manufacturers’ warranties are generally passed on to the end customer of the Company’s products, and the customer would generally deal directly with the component manufacturer. Accrued warranty is reported in ~~"Other~~“Other current ~~liabilities"~~liabilities” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company offers a ~~range~~variety of extended warranty ~~options across its product lines.~~programs. The premiums received for an extended warranty are generally deferred until after the expiration of the standard warranty period. The unearned premium is then recognized in income over the term of the extended warranty period in proportion to the costs that are expected to be incurred. Unamortized extended warranty premiums ~~included in the following table~~ totaled ~~$29.5~~$29.2 million and ~~$25.3~~$29.5 million at March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015, respectively, and are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Other current liabilities” or “Other long-term liabilities”.~~respectively.

Changes in the Company’s warranty liability and unearned extended warranty premiums were as follows (in millions):

Six Months Ended
March 31,
2016 2015
Balance at beginning of period $ 92.1
$ 101.9
Warranty provisions 19.8
19.8
Settlements made (27.1 ) (25.2 )
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, net 1.4
(3.5 )
Premiums received 7.4
5.8
Amortization of premiums received (5.4 ) (4.5 )
Foreign currency translation 0.2
(2.5 )
Balance at end of period $ 88.4
$ 91.8

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	89.6		$	92.1
Warranty provisions	24.7			19.8
Settlements made	(25.7		)	(27.1		)
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, net	(0.5		)	1.4
Premiums received	5.4			7.4
Amortization of premiums received	(5.8		)	(5.4		)
Foreign currency translation	(0.7		)	0.2
Balance at end of period	$	87.0		$	88.4

Provisions for estimated warranty and other related costs are recorded at the time of sale and are periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. Certain warranty and other related claims involve matters of dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation. At times, warranty issues arise that are beyond the scope of the Company's historical experience. It is reasonably possible that additional warranty and other related claims could arise from disputes or other matters in excess of amounts accrued; however, the Company does not expect that any such amounts, while not determinable, would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, ~~result~~results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~10.~~9. Guarantee Arrangements

The Company is party to multiple agreements whereby at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 it guaranteed an aggregate of ~~$574.7~~$583.5 million in indebtedness of customers. The Company estimated that its maximum loss exposure under these contracts at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$121.3~~$118.1 million. Under the terms of these and various related agreements and upon the occurrence of certain events, the Company generally has the ability to, among other things, take possession of the underlying collateral. If the financial condition of the customers were to deteriorate and result in their inability to make payments, then loss provisions in excess of amounts provided for at inception may be required. While the Company does not expect to experience losses under these agreements that are materially in excess of the amounts reserved, it cannot provide any assurance that the financial condition of the third parties will not deteriorate resulting in the third parties’ inability to meet their obligations. In the event that this occurs, the Company cannot guarantee that the collateral underlying the agreements will be sufficient to avoid losses materially in excess of the amounts reserved. Any losses under these guarantees would generally be mitigated by the value of any underlying collateral, including financed equipment, and are generally subject to the finance company's ability to provide the Company clear title to foreclosed equipment and other conditions. During periods of economic weakness, collateral values generally decline and can contribute to higher exposure to losses.

Changes in the Company’s credit guarantee liability were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	5.8		$	4.8		$	5.6		$	4.6		$	8.5		$	5.8		$	8.4		$	5.6
Provision for new credit guarantees	1.5			0.9			2.3			1.5			0.9			1.5			1.5			2.3
Changes for pre-existing guarantees, net	0.3			(0.5		)	0.6			(0.4		)	0.4			0.3			0.5			0.6
Amortization of previous guarantees	(0.6		)	(0.9		)	(1.5		)	(1.3		)	(0.8		)	(0.6		)	(1.3		)	(1.5		)
Foreign currency translation	—			—			—			(0.1		)	0.1			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	7.0		$	4.3		$	7.0		$	4.3		$	9.1		$	7.0		$	9.1		$	7.0

~~11.~~10. Shareholders' Equity

On August 31, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors increased the Company's Common Stock repurchase authorization by 10,000,000 shares, increasing the repurchase authorization to 10,299,198 ~~shares from the balance remaining from prior authorizations.~~shares. Between August 31, 2015 and March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company repurchased 2,786,624 shares under this authorization at a cost of $112.0 million. As a result, the Company had 7,512,574 shares of Common Stock remaining under this repurchase authorization as of March 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The Company is restricted by its Credit Agreement from repurchasing shares in certain situations. See Note 87 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding these restrictions.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~12.~~11. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company has used forward foreign currency exchange contracts ~~(“derivatives”)~~(derivatives) to reduce the exchange rate risk of specific foreign currency denominated transactions. These derivatives typically require the exchange of a foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed rate at a future date. At times, the Company has designated these hedges as either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges under FASB Accounting Standards Codification ~~(“ASC”)~~(ASC) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging.At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the total notional U.S. dollar equivalent of outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts designated as hedges in accordance with ASC Topic 815 was ~~$5.9~~$7.4 million. Net gains or losses related to hedge ineffectiveness were insignificant for the three and six month periods ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. Ineffectiveness is included in “Miscellaneous, net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income along with mark-to-market adjustments on outstanding non-designated derivatives. ~~The~~At March 31, 2017, the maximum length of time the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows ~~is twelve~~was ten months.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company has entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to create an economic hedge to manage foreign exchange risk exposure associated with non-functional currency denominated payables resulting from global sourcing activities. The Company has not designated these derivative contracts as hedge transactions under FASB ASC Topic 815, and accordingly, the mark-to-market impact of these derivatives is recorded each period in current earnings. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the U.S. dollar equivalent of these outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts totaled ~~$92.2~~$106.4 millionin ~~notional~~notional amounts including $61.0 million in contracts to sell Australian dollars, $10.3 million in contracts to sell euro, $8.0 million in contracts to buy U.K. pound sterling, $6.5 million in contracts to buy euro and sell Canadian dollars and $5.0 million in contracts to buy Swedish krona and sell euro, with the remaining contracts covering a variety of foreign currencies.

The Company has entered into interest rate contracts to create an economic ~~hedges~~hedge to manage changes in interest rates on executory sales contracts that exposes the Company to interest rate risk based on changes in market interest rates. The Company has not designated these interest rate contracts as hedge transactions under FASB ASC Topic 815, and accordingly, the mark-to-market impact of these derivatives is recorded each period in current earnings. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the U.S. dollar equivalent notional amount of these outstanding interest rate contracts totaled ~~$19.9~~$19.8 million.

Fair Market Value of Financial Instruments — The fair values of all open derivative instruments were as follows (in millions):

March 31, 2016 September 30, 2015

Other
Current
Assets

Other
Current
Liabilities

Other
Current
Assets

Other
Current
Liabilities
Cash flow hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts $ 0.2
$ 0.1
$ 0.4
$ —

Not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts 0.2
2.4
0.3
0.4
Interest rate contracts —
0.7
—
0.7
$ 0.4
$ 3.2
$ 0.7
$ 1.1

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	March 31, 2017				September 30, 2016
	Other Current Assets		Other Current Liabilities		Other Current Assets		Other Current Liabilities
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts	$	0.5	$	0.3	$	0.1	$	0.4
Interest rate contracts	0.5		1.2		—		0.4
	$	1.0	$	1.5	$	0.1	$	0.8

The pre-tax effects of derivative instruments consisted of the following (in millions):


	Classification of Gains (Losses)	Three Months Ended March 31,					Six Months Ended March 31,					Classification of Gains (Losses)	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
		2016			2015		2016			2015			2017			2016			2017		2016
Cash flow hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous, net	$	(0.1	)	$	—	$	(0.1	)	$	—	Miscellaneous, net	$	—		$	(0.1	)	$	—	$	(0.1	)
Foreign exchange contracts												Cost of sales	—			—			0.1		—

Not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous, net	(4.5		)	5.4		(5.8		)	8.8		Miscellaneous, net	(1.7		)	(4.5		)	1.0		(5.8		)
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous, net	(0.1		)	—		(0.2		)	—		Miscellaneous, net	—			(0.1		)	0.4		(0.2		)
		$	(4.7	)	$	5.4	$	(6.1	)	$	8.8		$	(1.7	)	$	(4.7	)	$	1.5	$	(6.1	)

~~13.~~12. Fair Value Measurement

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures that categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The three levels are defined as follows:


Level 1:	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2:	Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.


Level 3:	Unobservable inputs reflecting management's own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

There were no transfers of assets between levels during the three and six months ended March 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

~~As of March 31, 2016 and September 30, 2015 the~~The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities were as follows (in millions):

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
March 31, 2016
Assets:
SERP plan assets ^(a)
$ 22.3
$ —
$ —
$ 22.3
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)
—
0.4
—
0.4

Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)
$ —
$ 2.5
$ —
$ 2.5
Interest rate contracts ^(c)

—
0.7
—
0.7

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
September 30, 2015
March 31, 2017
Assets:
SERP plan assets ^(a)									$	21.6	$	—	$	—	$	21.6
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)									—		0.5		—		0.5
Interest rate contracts ^(c)									—		0.5		—		0.5

Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)									$	—	$	0.3	$	—	$	0.3
Interest rate contracts ^(c)									—		1.2		—		1.2

September 30, 2016
Assets:
SERP plan assets ^(a)	$	21.6	$	—	$	—	$	21.6	$	21.7	$	—	$	—	$	21.7
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)	—		0.7		—		0.7		—		0.1		—		0.1

Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange derivatives ^(b)	$	—	$	0.4	$	—	$	0.4	$	—	$	0.4	$	—	$	0.4
Interest rate contracts ^(c)	—		0.7		—		0.7		—		0.4		—		0.4

_________________________

^(a)

Represents investments in a rabbi trust for the Company's non-qualified supplemental executive retirement ~~plans (“SERP”)~~plan (SERP). The fair values of these investments are determined using a market approach. Investments include mutual funds for which quoted prices in active markets are available. The Company records changes in the fair value of investments in “Miscellaneous, net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.


^(b)	Based on observable market transactions of forward currency prices.


^(c)	Based on observable market transactions of interest rate swap prices.

~~14.~~13. Stock-Based Compensation

In February ~~2009,~~2017, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2017 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan (the “2017 Stock Plan”). The 2017 Stock Plan replaced the 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan (as amended, the “2009 Stock Plan”)~~. The 2009 Stock Plan replaced~~, which succeeded the 2004 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan (as amended, the “2004 Stock Plan”). While no new awards will be granted under the 2004 Stock Plan or the 2009 Stock Plan, awards previously made under ~~the 2004 Stock Plan~~either plan that were outstanding as of the ~~initial~~ approval date of the ~~2009~~2017 Stock Plan will remain outstanding and continue to be governed by the provisions of the ~~2004 Stock Plan. On January 31, 2012, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2009 Stock Plan.~~respective stock plan under which they were issued. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had reserved ~~6,373,467~~9,180,842 shares of Common Stock available for issuance ~~under the 2009 Stock Plan~~ to provide for the exercise of outstanding stock options and the issuance of Common Stock under incentive compensation awards, including awards issued prior to the effective date of the ~~2009~~2017 Stock Plan.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period for vesting of an award, or to an employee's eligible retirement date, if earlier and applicable. Total stock-based compensation expense, including cash-based liability awards, for the three and six months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 was $6.5 million ($4.1 million net of tax) and ~~$12.5~~$14.4 million ($~~7.9~~9.1 million net of tax), respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense, including cash-based liability awards, for the three and six months ended March 31, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$6.8~~$6.5 million ($~~4.3~~4.1 million net of tax) and ~~$13.3~~$12.5 million ($~~8.4~~7.9 million net of tax), respectively.

14. Restructuring and Other Charges

On September 21, 2016, the Company committed to transition its access equipment aftermarket parts distribution network to a third party logistics company. As a result, the access equipment segment will cease operations at its Orrville, Ohio parts distribution center by August 1, 2017. This initiative is intended to improve customer service levels, increase operational efficiency and allow the Company to reallocate resources to invest in future growth. The Company expects to incur cash charges related to severance costs and other employment-related benefits of approximately $3.0 million related to this decision, of which $0.4 million and $1.1 million were incurred in the three and six months ended March 31, 2017, respectively.

In November 2016, the commercial segment recognized $0.4 million of restructuring costs to better align the commercial segment cost structure for long term success. This program is now complete.

On January 26, 2017, as part of simplification activities in support of the Company’s MOVE strategy, the access equipment segment announced it had committed to certain restructuring plans. The plans include the closure of its manufacturing plant and pre-delivery inspection facilities in Belgium, the streamlining of telehandler product offerings to a reduced range in Europe, the transfer of remaining European telehandler manufacturing to the Company’s facility in Romania and reductions in engineering staff supporting European telehandlers, including the closure of the UK-based engineering facility. The announced plans also include the move of North American telehandler production from Ohio to facilities in Pennsylvania. The Company expects total implementation costs for these actions to be approximately $45.0 million to $50.0 million, including approximately $11.0 million of operating costs related to the plans that are expected to result in future benefit to the Company. Approximately $43.0 million of the pre-tax implementation costs are expected to be incurred in fiscal 2017 with the remainder to be incurred in fiscal 2018. The access equipment segment recognized $16.3 million of restructuring costs under this plan for both the three and six months ended March 31, 2017. In addition, the access equipment segment recognized $0.9 million of operating expenses related to this plan in the three and six months ended March 31, 2017.

Pre-tax restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were as follows (in millions):



	Cost of Sales
Access equipment	$	16.7

Pre-tax restructuring charges for the six months ended March 31, 2017 were as follows (in millions):



	Cost of Sales		Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		Total
Access equipment	$	17.4	$	—	$	17.4
Commercial	—		0.4		0.4
Total	$	17.4	$	0.4	$	17.8

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Changes in the Company's restructuring reserves, included within "Other current liabilities" in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows (in millions):



	Employee Severance and Termination Benefits			Property, Plant and Equipment Impairment			Other Costs			Total
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	0.9		$	—		$	—		$	0.9
Restructuring provision	15.3			1.5			1.0			17.8
Utilized - cash	(1.2		)	—			(0.2		)	(1.4		)
Utilized - noncash	—			(1.5		)	—			(1.5		)
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$	15.0		$	—		$	0.8		$	15.8

15. Employee Benefit Plans

Components of net periodic pension benefit cost were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	2.8		$	3.0		$	5.7		$	6.0		$	3.2		$	2.8		$	6.5		$	5.7
Interest cost	4.5			4.5			9.1			9.0			4.4			4.5			8.8			9.1
Expected return on plan assets	(4.5		)	(4.5		)	(9.0		)	(9.1		)	(4.6		)	(4.5		)	(9.1		)	(9.0		)
Amortization of prior service cost	0.5			0.4			0.9			0.8			0.5			0.5			0.9			0.9
Amortization of net actuarial loss	0.6			0.6			1.2			1.3			1.0			0.6			2.0			1.2
	$	3.9		$	4.0		$	7.9		$	8.0
Net periodic benefit cost													$	4.5		$	3.9		$	9.1		$	7.9

Components of net periodic other post-employment benefit cost were as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	0.7		$	0.4		$	1.3		$	0.7
Interest cost	0.4			0.4			0.8			0.8
Amortization of prior service cost	(0.3		)	(0.3		)	(0.5		)	(0.5		)
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)	—			(0.1		)	0.1			(0.1		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	0.8		$	0.4		$	1.7		$	0.9

The Company made contributions to fund benefit payments under its other post-employment benefit plans of $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company estimates that it will make additional contributions of approximately $0.9 million under these other post-employment benefit plans prior to the end of fiscal 2017.

1819

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~Components of net periodic other post-employment benefit cost (income) were as follows (in millions):~~

Three Months Ended
March 31, Six Months Ended
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Components of net periodic benefit cost (income)
Service cost $ 0.4
$ 0.5
$ 0.7
$ 0.9
Interest cost 0.4
0.4
0.8
0.8
Amortization of prior service cost (0.3 ) (0.3 ) (0.5 ) (0.5 )
Curtailment —
—
—
(3.4 )
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain) (0.1 ) 0.1
(0.1 ) 0.1
$ 0.4
$ 0.7
$ 0.9
$ (2.1 )

The Company made contributions to fund benefit payments under its other post-employment benefit plans of $1.0 million for each of the six months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company estimates that it will make additional contributions of approximately $1.0 million under these other post-employment benefit plans prior to the end of fiscal 2016.

The Company's pension plan investment strategy is based on an expectation that, over time, equity securities will provide higher returns than debt securities. The plans primarily minimize the risk of larger losses under this strategy through diversification of investments by asset class, by investing in different styles of investment management within the classes and by using a number of different investment managers. Beginning in fiscal 2016, the Company began to implement a liability driven investment strategy for those pension plans with frozen benefits. The objective of this strategy is to more closely align the pension plan assets with the pension plan liabilities in terms of how both respond to changes in interest rates. Plan assets will be allocated to two investment categories, including a category containing high quality fixed income securities and another category comprised of traditional securities and alternative asset classes. Assets are managed externally according to guidelines approved by the Company. Over time, the Company intends to reduce assets allocated to the return seeking category and correspondingly increase assets allocated to the high quality fixed income category to align more closely with the pension plan obligations.

16. Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$20.3~~$23.6 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, or ~~27.0%~~35.0% of pre-tax income, compared to ~~$29.5~~$20.3 million, or ~~35.7%~~27.0% of pre-tax income, for the three months ended March 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were favorably impacted by $1.5 million of net discrete tax benefits, including a $1.8 million tax benefit related to employee-share based payments. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were favorably impacted by $4.4 million of discrete tax benefits, including $3.5 million related to provision to return adjustments and $0.8 million related to reduction in reserves for uncertain tax benefits resulting from statutes of limitations lapses. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were favorably impacted by $0.4 million of net discrete tax benefits related to reduction in reserves for uncertain tax benefits resulting from statutesstatues of limitations lapses.

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$22.0~~$28.8 million for the six months ended March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, or ~~24.1%~~31.6% of pre-tax income, compared to ~~$45.7~~$22.0 million, or ~~34.2%~~24.1% of pre-tax income for the six months ended March 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Tax expense included net discrete tax benefits of ~~$8.0~~$4.9 million and ~~$1.1~~$8.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Discrete tax benefits recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2017 included $2.0 million of tax benefits related to employee share-based payments and ~~2015, respectively.~~$2.9 million of tax benefits related to the release of valuation allowances on federal capital loss carryforwards and state net operating losses. Discrete tax benefits recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2016 included a $2.4 million benefit related to the reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit in December 2015, a $3.5 million benefit related to provision to return adjustments, and a $2.0 million benefit related to reduction in reserves for uncertain tax benefits relating to interest adjustments and statutes of limitations lapses. Discrete tax benefits recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2015 included a $2.2 million benefit related to the reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit in December 2014, a $0.4 million benefit related to reduction in reserves for uncertain tax benefits resulting from statutes of limitations lapses, and a $1.4 million charge related to provision to return adjustments.

The Company’s liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest and penalties, was ~~$27.3~~$39.8 million and ~~$27.0~~$37.4 million as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. As of March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, net unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, of ~~$18.0~~$26.2 million would affect the Company’s net income if recognized.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in the “Provision for income taxes” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. During the six months ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company recognized costs of $0.9 million and benefits of $1.4 ~~million and charges of $1.5~~ million, respectively, related to interest and penalties. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had accruals for the payment of interest and penalties of ~~$9.6~~$11.3 million. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that federal, state and foreign tax audit resolutions could reduce net unrecognized tax benefits by approximately ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million because the Company’s tax positions are sustained on audit, the Company agrees to their disallowance or the statutes of limitations close.

The Company files federal income tax returns as well as multiple state, local and non-U.S. jurisdiction tax returns. The Company is regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities.

17. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016												Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Gains (Losses) on Derivatives, Net of Tax			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period	$	(45.9	)	$	(109.3	)	$	0.3		$	(154.9	)	$	(73.1	)	$	(131.5	)	$	(204.6	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	—			18.9			(0.2		)	18.7			—			10.7			10.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	0.4			—			—			0.4
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income													0.8			—			0.8
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	0.4			18.9			(0.2		)	19.1			0.8			10.7			11.5
Balance at end of period	$	(45.5	)	$	(90.4	)	$	0.1		$	(135.8	)	$	(72.3	)	$	(120.8	)	$	(193.1	)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax Cumulative Translation Adjustments Gains (Losses) on Derivatives, Net of Tax Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period $ (44.4 ) $ (47.9 ) $ —
$ (92.3 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications —
(53.1 ) —
(53.1 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 0.5
—
—
0.5
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) 0.5
(53.1 ) —
(52.6 )
Balance at end of period $ (43.9 ) $ (101.0 ) $ —
$ (144.9 )

Six Months Ended March 31, 2016
Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax Cumulative Translation Adjustments Gains (Losses) on Derivatives, Net of Tax Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period $ (46.4 ) $ (98.1 ) $ 0.1
$ (144.4 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications —
7.7
—
7.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 0.9
—
—
0.9
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) 0.9
7.7
—
8.6
Balance at end of period $ (45.5 ) $ (90.4 ) $ 0.1
$ (135.8 )

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Derivative Instruments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period	$	(45.9	)	$	(109.3	)	$	0.3		$	(154.9	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	—			18.9			(0.2		)	18.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	0.4			—			—			0.4
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	0.4			18.9			(0.2		)	19.1
Balance at end of period	$	(45.5	)	$	(90.4	)	$	0.1		$	(135.8	)


	Six Months Ended March 31, 2015											Six Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Gains (Losses) on Derivatives, Net of Tax		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period	$	(44.2	)	$	(25.0	)	$	—	$	(69.2	)	$	(73.9	)	$	(101.1	)	$	(175.0	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	—			(76.0		)	—		(76.0		)	—			(19.7		)	(19.7		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	0.3			—			—		0.3
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income												1.6			—			1.6
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	0.3			(76.0		)	—		(75.7		)	1.6			(19.7		)	(18.1		)
Balance at end of period	$	(43.9	)	$	(101.0	)	$	—	$	(144.9	)	$	(72.3	)	$	(120.8	)	$	(193.1	)



	Six Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Employee Pension and Postretirement Benefits, Net of Tax			Cumulative Translation Adjustments			Derivative Instruments		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of period	$	(46.4	)	$	(98.1	)	$	0.1	$	(144.4	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	—			7.7			—		7.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	0.9			—			—		0.9
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	0.9			7.7			—		8.6
Balance at end of period	$	(45.5	)	$	(90.4	)	$	0.1	$	(135.8	)

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost (refer to Note 15 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details regarding employee benefit plans) were as follows (in millions):

Three Months Ended
March 31, Six Months Ended
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Amortization of employee pension and postretirement benefits items
Prior service costs $ (0.2 ) $ (0.1 ) $ (0.4 ) $ (0.3 )
Actuarial losses (0.5 ) (0.7 ) (1.1 ) (1.4 )
Curtailment —
—
—
1.2
(0.7 ) (0.8 ) (1.5 ) (0.5 )
Tax benefit 0.3
0.3
0.6
0.2
$ (0.4 ) $ (0.5 ) $ (0.9 ) $ (0.3 )

~~18. Earnings Per Share~~

~~Prior to September 1, 2013, the Company granted awards of nonvested stock that contained a nonforfeitable right to dividends, if declared. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,~~ ~~Earnings Per Share~~, these awards are considered to be participating securities, and as a result, earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method that determines earnings per share for common shares and participating securities. The undistributed earnings are allocated between common shares and participating securities as if all earnings had been distributed during the period. Participating securities and common shares have equal rights to undistributed earnings.

Effective September 1, 2013, new grants of awards of nonvested stock do not contain a nonforfeitable right to dividends during the vesting period. As a result, an employee will forfeit the right to dividends accrued on unvested awards if such awards do not ultimately vest. As such, these awards are not treated as participating securities in the earnings per share calculation as the employees do not have equivalent dividend rights as common shareholders.



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Amortization of employee pension and postretirement benefits items
Prior service costs	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.4	)	$	(0.4	)
Actuarial losses	(1.0		)	(0.5		)	(2.1		)	(1.1		)
Total before tax	(1.2		)	(0.7		)	(2.5		)	(1.5		)
Tax benefit	0.4			0.3			0.9			0.6
Net of tax	$	(0.8	)	$	(0.4	)	$	(1.6	)	$	(0.9	)

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

18. Earnings Per Share

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share was as follows (in millions, except number of share amounts):


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Six Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016		2015			2016		2015			2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income	$	56.1	$	54.6		$	70.7	$	89.3
Earnings allocated to participating securities	—		(0.1		)	—		(0.2		)
Earnings available to common shareholders	$	56.1	$	54.5		$	70.7	$	89.1		$	44.3	$	56.1	$	63.5	$	70.7

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	73,118,295		78,007,479			73,593,439		78,433,035			74,696,616		73,118,295		74,486,209		73,593,439

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	73,118,295		78,007,479			73,593,439		78,433,035			74,696,616		73,118,295		74,486,209		73,593,439
Dilutive stock options and other equity-based compensation awards	743,045		1,102,424			766,421		1,103,796			1,086,846		743,045		1,095,693		766,421
Participating restricted stock	—		(115,163		)	—		(112,237		)
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	73,861,340		78,994,740			74,359,860		79,424,594			75,783,462		73,861,340		75,581,902		74,359,860

Options not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders because they would have been anti-dilutive were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, Six Months Ended
March 31,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Stock options 1,656,741
1,144,416
1,676,943
1,156,103



	Three Months Ended March 31,		Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Stock options	389,950	1,656,741	391,962	1,676,943

19. Contingencies, Significant Estimates and Concentrations

Personal Injury Actions and Other - Product and general liability claims are made against the Company from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The Company is generally self-insured for future claims up to $5.0 million per claim. Accordingly, a reserve is maintained for the estimated costs of such claims. At March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the estimated net liabilities for product and general liability claims totaled ~~$38.3~~$36.8 million and ~~$40.4~~$38.3 million, respectively. There is inherent uncertainty as to the eventual resolution of unsettled claims. Management, however, believes that any losses in excess of established reserves will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Market Risks - The Company was contingently liable under bid, performance and specialty bonds totaling ~~$556.6~~$608.8 million and ~~$469.9~~$503.6 million at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Open standby letters of credit issued by the Company’s banks in favor of third parties totaled ~~$113.0~~$100.5 million and ~~$62.6~~$110.8 million at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

Other Matters - The Company is subject to environmental matters and legal proceedings and claims, including patent, antitrust, product liability, warranty and state dealership regulation compliance proceedings, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the final results of all such matters and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such matters and claims will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Actual results could vary, among other things, due to the uncertainties involved in litigation.

Major contracts for military systems are performed over extended periods of time and are subject to changes in scope of work and delivery schedules. Pricing negotiations on changes and settlement of claims often extend over prolonged periods of time. The Company’s ultimate profitability on such contracts may depend on the eventual outcome of an equitable settlement of contractual issues with the Company’s customers.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company was one of several bidders on a large, multi-year military truck solicitation for the Canadian government. The Company's bid was not selected and the Company subsequently submitted a legal challenge of that conclusion. In May 2016, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal ruled in the Company's favor in connection with that challenge. At this time, the Company is unable to estimate the ultimate impact of this challenge and subsequent ruling in the Company's favor.

20. Business Segment Information

The Company is organized into four reportable segments based on the internal organization used by management for making operating decisions and measuring performance and based on the similarity of customers served, common management, common use of facilities and economic results attained.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, for purposes of business segment performance measurement, the Company does not allocate to individual business segments costs or items that are of a non-operating nature or organizational or functional expenses of a corporate nature. The caption “Corporate” includes corporate office expenses, share-based compensation, costs of certain business initiatives and shared services or operations benefiting multiple segments, including start-up costs related to a shared manufacturing facility in Mexico, and results of insignificant operations. Identifiable assets of the business segments exclude general corporate assets, which principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, certain property, plant and equipment, and certain other assets pertaining to corporate activities. Intersegment sales generally include amounts invoiced by a segment for work performed for another segment. Amounts are based on actual work performed and agreed-upon pricing, which is intended to be reflective of the contribution made by the supplying business segment.

Selected financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments and product lines is as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended March 31,																Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016								2015								2017								2016
	External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales
Access equipment
Aerial work platforms	$	375.1	$	—		$	375.1		$	432.5	$	—		$	432.5		$	369.4	$	—		$	369.4		$	375.1	$	—		$	375.1
Telehandlers	214.7		—			214.7			379.7		—			379.7			161.6		—			161.6			214.7		—			214.7
Other	164.5		—			164.5			169.6		—			169.6			192.2		—			192.2			164.5		—			164.5
Total access equipment	754.3		—			754.3			981.8		—			981.8			723.2		—			723.2			754.3		—			754.3

Defense	296.8		0.2			297.0			157.6		1.1			158.7			445.7		0.4			446.1			296.8		0.2			297.0

Fire & emergency	237.2		3.2			240.4			194.6		8.3			202.9			233.5		4.0			237.5			237.2		3.2			240.4

Commercial
Concrete placement	111.3		—			111.3			111.0		—			111.0			112.7		—			112.7			111.3		—			111.3
Refuse collection	99.5		—			99.5			76.7		—			76.7			79.1		—			79.1			99.5		—			99.5
Other	25.2		0.7			25.9			32.5		0.7			33.2			22.3		1.9			24.2			25.2		0.7			25.9
Total commercial	236.0		0.7			236.7			220.2		0.7			220.9			214.1		1.9			216.0			236.0		0.7			236.7
Intersegment eliminations	—		(4.1		)	(4.1		)	—		(10.1		)	(10.1		)
	$	1,524.3	$	—		$	1,524.3		$	1,554.2	$	—		$	1,554.2
Corporate and intersegment eliminations																	1.8		(6.3		)	(4.5		)	—		(4.1		)	(4.1		)
Consolidated																	$	1,618.3	$	—		$	1,618.3		$	1,524.3	$	—		$	1,524.3

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended March 31,																Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016								2015								2017								2016
	External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales			External Customers		Inter- segment			Net Sales
Access equipment
Aerial work platforms	$	617.1	$	—		$	617.1		$	709.8	$	—		$	709.8		$	603.1	$	—		$	603.1		$	617.1	$	—		$	617.1
Telehandlers	326.5		—			326.5			670.1		—			670.1			254.9		—			254.9			326.5		—			326.5
Other	340.5		—			340.5			318.6		—			318.6			354.4		—			354.4			340.5		—			340.5
Total access equipment	1,284.1		—			1,284.1			1,698.5		—			1,698.5			1,212.4		—			1,212.4			1,284.1		—			1,284.1

Defense	613.7		1.3			615.0			426.8		1.2			428.0			739.9		0.7			740.6			613.7		1.3			615.0

Fire & emergency	442.6		5.3			447.9			354.1		15.8			369.9			462.6		7.4			470.0			442.6		5.3			447.9

Commercial
Concrete placement	183.6		—			183.6			197.1		—			197.1			197.1		—			197.1			183.6		—			183.6
Refuse collection	198.5		—			198.5			166.3		—			166.3			171.3		—			171.3			198.5		—			198.5
Other	53.8		1.1			54.9			64.7		3.0			67.7			43.8		3.0			46.8			53.8		1.1			54.9
Total commercial	435.9		1.1			437.0			428.1		3.0			431.1			412.2		3.0			415.2			435.9		1.1			437.0
Intersegment eliminations	—		(7.7		)	(7.7		)	—		(20.0		)	(20.0		)
	$	2,776.3	$	—		$	2,776.3		$	2,907.5	$	—		$	2,907.5
Corporate and intersegment eliminations																	2.6		(11.1		)	(8.5		)	—		(7.7		)	(7.7		)
Consolidated																	$	2,829.7	$	—		$	2,829.7		$	2,776.3	$	—		$	2,776.3


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Operating income (loss):
Access equipment	$	75.7		$	136.9		$	96.1		$	214.1		$	42.1		$	75.7		$	66.5		$	96.1
Defense	27.8			(12.0		)	51.0			(2.2		)	48.7			27.8			72.5			51.0
Fire & emergency	14.9			9.0			25.0			10.5			21.8			14.9			38.8			25.0
Commercial	17.2			8.6			26.1			21.0			6.0			17.2			10.6			26.1
Corporate	(44.2		)	(32.8		)	(76.5		)	(68.1		)	(38.2		)	(44.2		)	(71.8		)	(76.5		)
Intersegment eliminations	—			—			—			0.1			—			—			—			—
	91.4			109.7			121.7			175.4
Consolidated													80.4			91.4			116.6			121.7
Interest expense, net of interest income	(15.1		)	(28.2		)	(29.2		)	(41.8		)	(14.1		)	(15.1		)	(28.0		)	(29.2		)
Miscellaneous other income (expense)	(1.0		)	1.3			(1.0		)	—			1.2			(1.0		)	2.5			(1.0		)
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	$	75.3		$	82.8		$	91.5		$	133.6		$	67.5		$	75.3		$	91.1		$	91.5

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	March 31,		September 30,		March 31,		September 30,
	2016		2015		2017		2016
Identifiable assets:
Access equipment:
U.S.	$	2,168.1	$	2,178.7	$	1,993.8	$	1,856.0
Europe ^(a)	546.1		531.4		491.6		521.5
Rest of the World	214.4		201.5		218.6		193.7
Total access equipment	2,928.6		2,911.6		2,704.0		2,571.2
Defense:
U.S.	571.5		424.5		708.4		522.2
Rest of the World	1.8		5.1		2.6		3.0
Total defense	573.3		429.6		711.0		525.2
Fire & emergency - U.S.	532.1		530.7		537.3		522.7
Commercial:
U.S.	404.8		395.1		374.5		358.4
Rest of the World ^(a)	40.9		41.1		32.3		33.4
Total commercial	445.7		436.2		406.8		391.8
Corporate:
U.S. ^(b)(a)	206.7		218.6		531.2		408.3
Rest of the World ^(c)	64.8		86.3
Rest of the world ^(b)					98.5		94.6
Total corporate	271.5		304.9		629.7		502.9
	$	4,751.2	$	4,613.0
Consolidated					$	4,988.8	$	4,513.8

_________________________


^(a)	~~Includes investments in unconsolidated affiliates.~~Primarily includes cash and short-term investments.


^(b)	Primarily includes ~~cash, short-term investments and capitalized costs related to a shared enterprise resource planning system.~~


^(c)	~~Includes cash and~~ a corporate-led manufacturing facility that supports multiple operating segments.

The following table presents net sales by geographic region based on product shipment destination (in millions):

Six Months Ended March 31,
2016 2015
Net sales:
United States $ 2,070.4
$ 2,321.0
Other North America 116.3
143.5
Europe, Africa and Middle East 388.1
229.6
Rest of the World 201.5
213.4
$ 2,776.3
$ 2,907.5

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OSHKOSH CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net sales:
United States	$	2,237.5	$	2,070.4
Other North America	82.7		116.3
Europe, Africa and Middle East	351.2		388.1
Rest of the World	158.3		201.5
Consolidated	$	2,829.7	$	2,776.3

21. Separate Financial Information of Subsidiary Guarantors of Indebtedness

The 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes are jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of the Company’s 100% owned existing and future subsidiaries that from time to time guarantee obligations under the Credit Agreement, with certain exceptions (the “Guarantors”).

Under the Indentures governing the 2022 Senior Notes and 2025 Senior Notes, a Guarantor’s guarantee of such Senior Notes will be automatically and unconditionally released and will terminate upon the following customary circumstances: (i) the sale of such Guarantor or substantially all of the assets of such Guarantor if such sale complies with the ~~Indentures;~~indentures; (ii) if such Guarantor no longer guarantees certain other indebtedness of the Company; or (iii) the defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the ~~Indentures.~~ indentures.

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following condensed supplemental consolidating financial information reflects the summarized financial information of Oshkosh Corporation, the Guarantors on a combined basis and Oshkosh Corporation’s non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis (in millions):

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017



	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	1,378.1		$	285.1		$	(44.9	)	$	1,618.3
Cost of sales	(0.2		)	1,132.9			268.9			(44.6		)	1,357.0
Gross income	0.2			245.2			16.2			(0.3		)	261.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses	35.6			103.9			30.3			—			169.8
Amortization of purchased intangibles	—			9.6			1.5			—			11.1
Operating income (loss)	(35.4		)	131.7			(15.6		)	(0.3		)	80.4
Interest expense	(13.6		)	(13.7		)	(0.5		)	12.7			(15.1		)
Interest income	0.6			4.2			8.9			(12.7		)	1.0
Miscellaneous, net	24.3			(54.7		)	31.6			—			1.2
Income (loss) before income taxes	(24.1		)	67.5			24.4			(0.3		)	67.5
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	(9.3		)	22.4			10.6			(0.1		)	23.6
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates	(14.8		)	45.1			13.8			(0.2		)	43.9
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	59.1			7.9			8.0			(75.0		)	—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—			—			0.4			—			0.4
Net income	44.3			53.0			22.2			(75.2		)	44.3
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	11.5			1.5			9.4			(10.9		)	11.5
Comprehensive income	$	55.8		$	54.5		$	31.6		$	(86.1	)	$	55.8

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016


	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total			Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	1,284.0		$	269.4		$	(29.1	)	$	1,524.3		$	—		$	1,284.0		$	269.4		$	(29.1	)	$	1,524.3
Cost of sales	0.4			1,071.0			222.8			(29.2		)	1,265.0			0.4			1,071.0			222.8			(29.2		)	1,265.0
Gross income	(0.4		)	213.0			46.6			0.1			259.3
Gross income (loss)																(0.4		)	213.0			46.6			0.1			259.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses	35.0			96.9			22.8			—			154.7			35.0			96.9			22.8			—			154.7
Amortization of purchased intangibles	—			9.7			3.5			—			13.2			—			9.7			3.5			—			13.2
Operating income (loss)	(35.4		)	106.4			20.3			0.1			91.4			(35.4		)	106.4			20.3			0.1			91.4
Interest expense	(70.4		)	(16.2		)	(0.4		)	71.4			(15.6		)	(70.4		)	(16.2		)	(0.4		)	71.4			(15.6		)
Interest income	0.4			23.1			48.4			(71.4		)	0.5			0.4			23.1			48.4			(71.4		)	0.5
Miscellaneous, net	13.6			(50.5		)	35.9			—			(1.0		)	13.6			(50.5		)	35.9			—			(1.0		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(91.8		)	62.8			104.2			0.1			75.3			(91.8		)	62.8			104.2			0.1			75.3
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	(34.1		)	18.8			35.6			—			20.3			(34.1		)	18.8			35.6			—			20.3
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates	(57.7		)	44.0			68.6			0.1			55.0			(57.7		)	44.0			68.6			0.1			55.0
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	113.8			36.0			19.6			(169.4		)	—			113.8			36.0			19.6			(169.4		)	—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—			—			1.1			—			1.1			—			—			1.1			—			1.1
Net income	56.1			80.0			89.3			(169.3		)	56.1			56.1			80.0			89.3			(169.3		)	56.1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	19.1			0.7			18.0			(18.7		)	19.1			19.1			0.7			18.0			(18.7		)	19.1
Comprehensive income	$	75.2		$	80.7		$	107.3		$	(188.0	)	$	75.2		$	75.2		$	80.7		$	107.3		$	(188.0	)	$	75.2

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income

For the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2015~~2017


	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total			Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	1,298.5		$	277.9		$	(22.2	)	$	1,554.2		$	—		$	2,427.9		$	488.0		$	(86.2	)	$	2,829.7
Cost of sales	0.3			1,087.7			212.3			(21.9		)	1,278.4			(1.0		)	2,007.4			448.4			(86.1		)	2,368.7
Gross income	(0.3		)	210.8			65.6			(0.3		)	275.8			1.0			420.5			39.6			(0.1		)	461.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses	28.1			99.3			25.4			—			152.8			67.2			195.4			58.2			—			320.8
Amortization of purchased intangibles	—			9.9			3.4			—			13.3			—			19.2			4.4			—			23.6
Operating income (loss)	(28.4		)	101.6			36.8			(0.3		)	109.7			(66.2		)	205.9			(23.0		)	(0.1		)	116.6
Interest expense	(74.6		)	(13.1		)	(0.4		)	59.3			(28.8		)	(27.2		)	(27.3		)	(1.0		)	25.7			(29.8		)
Interest income	0.4			16.0			43.5			(59.3		)	0.6			1.3			8.3			17.9			(25.7		)	1.8
Miscellaneous, net	10.0			(5.7		)	(3.0		)	—			1.3			46.8			(106.9		)	62.6			—			2.5
Income (loss) before income taxes	(92.6		)	98.8			76.9			(0.3		)	82.8			(45.3		)	80.0			56.5			(0.1		)	91.1
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	(29.0		)	32.0			26.6			(0.1		)	29.5			(14.4		)	25.4			17.8			—			28.8
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates	(63.6		)	66.8			50.3			(0.2		)	53.3			(30.9		)	54.6			38.7			(0.1		)	62.3
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	118.2			17.7			72.1			(208.0		)	—			94.4			23.6			(2.7		)	(115.3		)	—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—			—			1.3			—			1.3			—			—			1.2			—			1.2
Net income	54.6			84.5			123.7			(208.2		)	54.6			63.5			78.2			37.2			(115.4		)	63.5
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(52.6		)	(1.5		)	(42.1		)	43.6			(52.6		)	(18.1		)	0.6			(19.8		)	19.2			(18.1		)
Comprehensive income	$	2.0		$	83.0		$	81.6		$	(164.6	)	$	2.0		$	45.4		$	78.8		$	17.4		$	(96.2	)	$	45.4

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2016


	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total			Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	2,340.8		$	489.8		$	(54.3	)	$	2,776.3		$	—		$	2,340.8		$	489.8		$	(54.3	)	$	2,776.3
Cost of sales	0.7			1,970.0			417.9			(54.4		)	2,334.2			0.7			1,970.0			417.9			(54.4		)	2,334.2
Gross income	(0.7		)	370.8			71.9			0.1			442.1
Gross income (loss)																(0.7		)	370.8			71.9			0.1			442.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses	58.6			186.2			49.2			—			294.0			58.6			186.2			49.2			—			294.0
Amortization of purchased intangibles	—			19.5			6.9			—			26.4			—			19.5			6.9			—			26.4
Operating income (loss)	(59.3		)	165.1			15.8			0.1			121.7			(59.3		)	165.1			15.8			0.1			121.7
Interest expense	(130.0		)	(30.9		)	(1.1		)	131.8			(30.2		)	(130.0		)	(30.9		)	(1.1		)	131.8			(30.2		)
Interest income	0.9			39.3			92.6			(131.8		)	1.0			0.9			39.3			92.6			(131.8		)	1.0
Miscellaneous, net	28.5			(91.9		)	62.4			—			(1.0		)	28.5			(91.9		)	62.4			—			(1.0		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(159.9		)	81.6			169.7			0.1			91.5			(159.9		)	81.6			169.7			0.1			91.5
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	(39.9		)	20.4			41.5			—			22.0			(39.9		)	20.4			41.5			—			22.0
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates	(120.0		)	61.2			128.2			0.1			69.5			(120.0		)	61.2			128.2			0.1			69.5
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	191.0			54.1			13.2			(258.3		)	—			191.0			54.1			13.2			(258.3		)	—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	(0.3		)	—			1.5			—			1.2			(0.3		)	—			1.5			—			1.2
Net income	70.7			115.3			142.9			(258.2		)	70.7			70.7			115.3			142.9			(258.2		)	70.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	8.6			(2.2		)	9.9			(7.7		)	8.6			8.6			(2.2		)	9.9			(7.7		)	8.6
Comprehensive income	$	79.3		$	113.1		$	152.8		$	(265.9	)	$	79.3		$	79.3		$	113.1		$	152.8		$	(265.9	)	$	79.3

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating ~~Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income~~

~~For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2015~~

Oshkosh
Corporation

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total
Net sales $ —
$ 2,456.9
$ 492.7
$ (42.1 ) $ 2,907.5
Cost of sales 0.3
2,054.5
389.3
(42.1 ) 2,402.0
Gross income (0.3 ) 402.4
103.4
—
505.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses 59.9
191.4
52.0
—
303.3
Amortization of purchased intangibles —
19.7
7.1
—
26.8
Operating income (loss) (60.2 ) 191.3
44.3
—
175.4
Interest expense (132.4 ) (25.9 ) (0.9 ) 116.0
(43.2 )
Interest income 0.9
31.3
85.2
(116.0 ) 1.4
Miscellaneous, net 18.2
(69.0 ) 50.8
—
—
Income (loss) before income taxes (173.5 ) 127.7
179.4
—
133.6
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes (57.6 ) 44.0
59.3
—
45.7
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates (115.9 ) 83.7
120.1
—
87.9
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries 205.2
53.5
84.6
(343.3 ) —
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates —
—
1.4
—
1.4
Net income 89.3
137.2
206.1
(343.3 ) 89.3
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (75.7 ) (4.2 ) (71.9 ) 76.1
(75.7 )
Comprehensive income $ 13.6
$ 133.0
$ 134.2
$ (267.2 ) $ 13.6

~~Condensed Consolidating~~ Balance Sheet

As of March 31, ~~2016~~2017


	Oshkosh Corporation		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total		Oshkosh Corporation		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5.8	$	4.8	$	27.8		$	—		$	38.4	$	373.5	$	2.7	$	37.2		$	—		$	413.4
Receivables, net	22.3		819.3		245.9			(41.5		)	1,046.0		30.2		725.8		233.2			(44.1		)	945.1
Inventories, net	—		958.0		415.4			—			1,373.4		—		1,002.9		452.2			—			1,455.1
Other current assets	22.5		83.5		26.4			—			132.4		31.5		50.3		8.3			—			90.1
Total current assets	50.6		1,865.6		715.5			(41.5		)	2,590.2		435.2		1,781.7		730.9			(44.1		)	2,903.7
Investment in and advances to consolidated subsidiaries	5,922.5		1,206.2		(183.1		)	(6,945.6		)	—		2,816.1		1,282.4		(104.8		)	(3,993.7		)	—
Intercompany receivables	47.9		1,051.8		4,442.1			(5,541.8		)	—		48.0		343.2		1,808.0			(2,199.2		)	—
Intangible assets, net	—		966.6		619.6			—			1,586.2		—		928.2		595.9			—			1,524.1
Other long-term assets	120.8		219.3		234.7			—			574.8		82.6		227.8		250.6			—			561.0
Total assets	$	6,141.8	$	5,309.5	$	5,828.8		$	(12,528.9	)	$	4,751.2	$	3,381.9	$	4,563.3	$	3,280.6		$	(6,237.0	)	$	4,988.8

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	12.4	$	485.2	$	141.4		$	(41.3	)	$	597.7	$	15.8	$	571.9	$	150.8		$	(43.9	)	$	694.6
Customer advances	—		520.9		5.0			—			525.9		—		668.0		4.0			—			672.0
Other current liabilities	215.0		211.2		94.9			(0.2		)	520.9		80.2		247.6		99.1			(0.2		)	426.7
Total current liabilities	227.4		1,217.3		241.3			(41.5		)	1,644.5		96.0		1,487.5		253.9			(44.1		)	1,793.3
Long-term debt, less current maturities	845.0		—		—			—			845.0		817.1		—		—			—			817.1
Intercompany payables	3,134.4		2,359.5		47.9			(5,541.8		)	—		364.2		1,787.0		48.0			(2,199.2		)	—
Other long-term liabilities	60.6		188.7		138.0			—			387.3		71.3		148.8		125.0			—			345.1
Shareholders' equity	1,874.4		1,544.0		5,401.6			(6,945.6		)	1,874.4
Total shareholders' equity													2,033.3		1,140.0		2,853.7			(3,993.7		)	2,033.3
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	6,141.8	$	5,309.5	$	5,828.8		$	(12,528.9	)	$	4,751.2	$	3,381.9	$	4,563.3	$	3,280.6		$	(6,237.0	)	$	4,988.8

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016


	Oshkosh Corporation		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total		Oshkosh Corporation		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14.8	$	6.3	$	21.8		$	—		$	42.9	$	285.4	$	1.7	$	34.8		$	—		$	321.9
Receivables, net	29.4		692.9		290.1			(47.8		)	964.6		13.0		734.3		319.6			(45.0		)	1,021.9
Inventories, net	—		926.2		375.5			—			1,301.7		—		679.1		300.7			—			979.8
Other current assets	11.5		81.7		26.9			—			120.1		28.0		58.5		7.4			—			93.9
Total current assets	55.7		1,707.1		714.3			(47.8		)	2,429.3		326.4		1,473.6		662.5			(45.0		)	2,417.5
Investment in and advances to consolidated subsidiaries	5,744.0		1,128.0		(192.4		)	(6,679.6		)	—		6,148.2		1,253.6		(120.0		)	(7,281.8		)	—
Intercompany receivables	47.2		998.7		4,331.3			(5,377.2		)	—		48.0		1,353.7		4,632.2			(6,033.9		)	—
Intangible assets, net	—		984.4		623.4			—			1,607.8		—		947.5		609.5			—			1,557.0
Other long-term assets	117.3		228.9		229.7			—			575.9		87.3		232.7		219.3			—			539.3
Total assets	$	5,964.2	$	5,047.1	$	5,706.3		$	(12,104.6	)	$	4,613.0	$	6,609.9	$	5,261.1	$	6,003.5		$	(13,360.7	)	$	4,513.8

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	16.3	$	415.3	$	168.7		$	(47.5	)	$	552.8	$	13.3	$	375.0	$	122.6		$	(44.8	)	$	466.1
Customer advances	—		438.3		1.9			—			440.2		—		465.8		6.0			—			471.8
Other current liabilities	165.0		202.4		98.0			(0.3		)	465.1		85.5		246.5		97.9			(0.2		)	429.7
Total current liabilities	181.3		1,056.0		268.6			(47.8		)	1,458.1		98.8		1,087.3		226.5			(45.0		)	1,367.6
Long-term debt, less current maturities	855.0		—		—			—			855.0		826.2		—		—			—			826.2
Intercompany payables	2,957.5		2,372.5		47.2			(5,377.2		)	—		3,639.4		2,346.5		48.0			(6,033.9		)	—
Other long-term liabilities	59.3		191.3		138.2			—			388.8		69.0		147.9		126.6			—			343.5
Shareholders' equity	1,911.1		1,427.3		5,252.3			(6,679.6		)	1,911.1
Total shareholders' equity													1,976.5		1,679.4		5,602.4			(7,281.8		)	1,976.5
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	5,964.2	$	5,047.1	$	5,706.3		$	(12,104.6	)	$	4,613.0	$	6,609.9	$	5,261.1	$	6,003.5		$	(13,360.7	)	$	4,513.8

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017


	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total			Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	$	(125.8	)	$	99.3		$	121.0		$	—		$	94.5		$	(20.4	)	$	193.2		$	(24.7	)	$	—		$	148.1

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(12.7		)	(12.3		)	(15.3		)	—			(40.3		)	(1.6		)	(19.6		)	(6.8		)	—			(28.0		)
Additions to equipment held for rental	—			—			(22.7		)	—			(22.7		)	—			—			(24.6		)	—			(24.6		)
Proceeds from sale of equipment held for rental	—			0.6			25.5			—			26.1			—			—			19.8			—			19.8
Intercompany investing	(0.7		)	(76.4		)	(108.4		)	185.5			—			—			387.0			—			(387.0		)	—
Other investing activities	(1.0		)	—			—			—			(1.0		)	(0.8		)	(0.1		)	—			—			(0.9		)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities	(14.4		)	(88.1		)	(120.9		)	185.5			(37.9		)	(2.4		)	367.3			(11.6		)	(387.0		)	(33.7		)

Financing activities:
Net decrease in short-term debt	(21.3		)	—			—			—			(21.3		)
Proceeds from issuance of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	270.0			—			3.5			—			273.5
Repayment of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	(190.0		)	—			—			—			(190.0		)
Repayments of debt (original maturities greater than three months)																(20.0		)	—			—			—			(20.0		)
Repurchases of Common Stock	(100.1		)	—			—			—			(100.1		)	(3.0		)	—			—			—			(3.0		)
Dividends paid	(28.0		)	—			—			—			(28.0		)	(31.3		)	—			—			—			(31.3		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	1.9			—			—			—			1.9			33.2			—			—			—			33.2
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	0.9			—			—			—			0.9
Intercompany financing	197.8			(13.0		)	0.7			(185.5		)	—			132.0			(559.5		)	40.5			387.0			—
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities	131.2			(13.0		)	4.2			(185.5		)	(63.1		)	110.9			(559.5		)	40.5			387.0			(21.1		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	—			0.3			1.7			—			2.0			—			—			(1.8		)	—			(1.8		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(9.0		)	(1.5		)	6.0			—			(4.5		)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents																88.1			1.0			2.4			—			91.5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14.8			6.3			21.8			—			42.9			285.4			1.7			34.8			—			321.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5.8		$	4.8		$	27.8		$	—		$	38.4		$	373.5		$	2.7		$	37.2		$	—		$	413.4

Table of Contents

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended March 31, ~~2015~~2016


	Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total			Oshkosh Corporation			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	$	(85.1	)	$	(20.6	)	$	35.0		$	—		$	(70.7	)	$	(124.3	)	$	99.3		$	121.0		$	—		$	96.0

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(14.4		)	(11.9		)	(43.5		)	—			(69.8		)	(12.7		)	(12.3		)	(15.3		)	—			(40.3		)
Additions to equipment held for rental	—			—			(15.5		)	—			(15.5		)	—			—			(22.7		)	—			(22.7		)
Proceeds from sale of equipment held for rental	—			—			13.4			—			13.4			—			0.6			25.5			—			26.1
Intercompany investing	(19.0		)	13.0			(19.0		)	25.0			—			(0.7		)	(76.4		)	(108.4		)	185.5			—
Other investing activities	(0.5		)	(0.7		)	(0.3		)	—			(1.5		)	(1.0		)	—			—			—			(1.0		)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities	(33.9		)	0.4			(64.9		)	25.0			(73.4		)
Net cash used by investing activities																(14.4		)	(88.1		)	(120.9		)	185.5			(37.9		)

Financing activities:
Net increase in short-term debt	13.7			—			—			—			13.7
Proceeds from issuance of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	315.0			—			—			—			315.0			270.0			—			3.5			—			273.5
Repayment of debt (original maturities greater than three months)	(325.0		)	—			—			—			(325.0		)
Repayments of debt (original maturities greater than three months)																(190.0		)	—			—			—			(190.0		)
Net decrease in short-term debt																(21.3		)	—			—			—			(21.3		)
Repurchases of Common Stock	(88.1		)	—			—			—			(88.1		)	(101.6		)	—			—			—			(101.6		)
Dividends paid	(26.7		)	—			—			—			(26.7		)	(28.0		)	—			—			—			(28.0		)
Debt issuance cost	(15.4		)	—			—			—			(15.4		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	3.4			—			—			—			3.4			1.9			—			—			—			1.9
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	4.1			—			—			—			4.1			0.9			—			—			—			0.9
Intercompany financing	(30.7		)	22.0			33.7			(25.0		)	—			197.8			(13.0		)	0.7			(185.5		)	—
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities	(149.7		)	22.0			33.7			(25.0		)	(119.0		)	129.7			(13.0		)	4.2			(185.5		)	(64.6		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	—			(0.8		)	3.5			—			2.7			—			0.3			1.7			—			2.0
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(268.7		)	1.0			7.3			—			(260.4		)	(9.0		)	(1.5		)	6.0			—			(4.5		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	281.8			4.7			27.3			—			313.8			14.8			6.3			21.8			—			42.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	13.1		$	5.7		$	34.6		$	—		$	53.4		$	5.8		$	4.8		$	27.8		$	—		$	38.4


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain statements that Oshkosh Corporation (the “Company”) believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, including those under the caption “Executive Overview” are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking ~~statements.These~~statements. These factors include the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets, which are particularly impacted by the strength of U.S. and European economies and construction seasons; the Company’s estimates of access equipment demand which, among other factors, is influenced by customer historical buying patterns and rental company fleet replacement strategies; the strength of the U.S. dollar and its impact on Company exports, translation of foreign sales and purchased materials; the expected level and timing of U.S. Department of Defense ~~(“DoD”)~~(DoD) and international defense customer procurement of products and services and acceptance of and funding or payments ~~thereof; the Company’s ability to utilize material~~for such products and ~~components which it has committed to purchase from suppliers;~~services; higher material costs resulting from production variability due to uncertainty of timing of funding or payments from international defense customers; risks related to reductions in government expenditures in light of U.S. defense budget pressures, sequestration and an uncertain DoD tactical wheeled vehicle strategy; the impact of any DoD solicitation for competition for future contracts to produce military vehicles, including a future Family of Medium Tactical Vehicle ~~(“FMTV”)~~ production contract; the Company’s ability to increase prices to raise margins or offset higher input costs; increasing commodity and other raw material costs, particularly in a sustained economic recovery; risks related to facilities expansion, consolidation and alignment, including the amounts of related costs and charges and that anticipated cost savings may not be achieved; global economic uncertainty, which could lead to additional impairment charges related to many of the Company’s intangible assets and/or a slower recovery in the Company’s cyclical businesses than Company or equity market expectations; projected adoption rates of work at height machinery in emerging markets; the impact of severe weather or natural disasters that may affect the Company, its suppliers or its customers; risks related to the collectability of receivables, particularly for those businesses with exposure to construction markets; the cost of any warranty campaigns related to the Company’s products; risks related to production or shipment delays arising from quality or production ~~issues;~~issues, including any delays as a result of an accident at the Company’s Dodge Center manufacturing facility; risks associated with international operations and sales, including compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; the Company’s ability to comply with complex laws and regulations applicable to U.S. government contractors; cybersecurity risks and costs of defending against, mitigating and responding to a data security breach; and risks related to the Company’s ability to successfully execute on its strategic road map and meet its long-term financial goals. Additional information concerning these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the Company's U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ~~(“SEC”)~~(SEC) filings, including, but not limited to, the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April ~~28, 2016~~26, 2017 and Item 1A. of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All forward-looking statements, including those under the caption “Executive Overview,” speak only as of the date the Company files this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to update information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Investors should be aware that the Company may not update such information until the Company’s next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all.

All references herein to earnings per share refer to earning per share assuming dilution.

General

Major products manufactured and marketed by each of the Company’s business segments are as follows:

Access equipment— aerial work platforms and telehandlers used in a wide variety of construction, agricultural, industrial, institutional and general maintenance applications to position workers and materials at elevated heights, as well as ~~wreckers~~carriers and

~~car carriers.~~ wreckers. Access equipment customers include equipment rental companies, construction contractors, manufacturing companies, home improvement centers and towing companies in the U.S. and abroad.

Defense— tactical trucks, trailers and supply parts and services sold to the U.S. military and to other militaries around the world.

Fire & emergency— custom and commercial firefighting vehicles and equipment, aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles, snow removal vehicles, simulators and other emergency vehicles primarily sold to fire departments, airports and other governmental units, and broadcast vehicles sold to broadcasters and TV stations in the U.S. and abroad.

Commercial— concrete mixers, refuse collection vehicles, portable and stationary concrete batch plants and vehicle components sold to ready-mix companies and commercial and municipal waste haulers in the Americas and other international markets and field service vehicles and truck-mounted cranes sold to mining, construction and other companies in the U.S. and abroad.

Executive Overview

The positive momentum the Company generated in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 continued in the Company’s second quarter, as the Company reported earnings per share that exceeded the Company's expectations. The Company also exited the quarter with backlog up compared to the prior year quarter in all of the Company’s segments. The Company reported earnings per share of $0.58 in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $0.76 in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2016. Second quarter fiscal 2017 results included $17.2 million, or $0.18 per share, of restructuring-related costs recorded in the access equipment segment as part of a restructuring plan announced in January 2017. The better than expected results for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 were driven by the defense and access equipment segments. Defense segment results compared to ~~$0.69~~the Company’s expectations benefited from the timing of sales and stronger than expected program execution. Access equipment segment results compared to the Company’s expectations benefited from a favorable product mix and a delay in the timing of discretionary spend.

Consolidated net sales increased $94.0 million, or 6.2%, to $1.62 billion in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. Share repurchases completed during the previous twelve month period had the effect of increasing earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 by $0.05~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. Results~~2016. A 50% increase in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 also benefited by $0.06 per share from discrete tax items. Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 included $14.7 million ($9.3 million, or $0.12 per share, after-tax) of debt extinguishment costs related to the refinancing of the Company's senior notes due 2020. Improved results in the defense ~~commercial and fire & emergency segments were more than offset by lower access equipment~~ segment results, primarily related to lower sales levels, and start-up costs related to a shared production facility in Mexico. The lower sales and earnings in the access equipment segment were the result of a slowdown in North American replacement demand for access equipment that began in the summer of fiscal 2015 and lower telehandler demand after strong demand in the prior year quarter related to the transition to new Tier 4 engine emissions standards. Access equipment sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 were also negatively impacted by many rental companies taking a more cautious approach to their rental fleet capital expenditures, preferring to wait to make purchases until they had a better view of the 2016 construction market. While this cautious approach negatively impacted the second quarter fiscal 2016 results2017 compared to ~~the prior year quarter, as noted below, access equipment results for~~ the second quarter of fiscal 2016, ~~exceeded the Company's previous expectations.~~

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2016 exceeded the Company's previous expectations, primarily in the access equipment and defense segments. The Company believes the better than expected results in the access equipment segment were due to timing as the Company believes that some customers placed their fleet orders earlier than previously expected as they gained confidence that the U.S. economy was not headed for a recession, that the U.S. construction outlook was solid and a relatively milder winter in the U.S. allowed construction activity to start earlier this year. The better than expected results in the defense segment were drivenled by higher aftermarket parts sales and sales of higher content vehicles along with improved operational performance. Based on the discrete tax benefits recorded in the second quarter and increased expectations for results in the defense segment, partially offset by expected higher corporate costs, the Company is raising its full year earnings per share outlook by $0.10, from a range of $2.20 to $2.60 to a range of $2.30 to $2.70.

The Company continued to execute on its goal to improve operational performance, evidenced by higher sales, operating income and operating income margins in the defense, fire & emergency and commercial segments. Additional highlights for the second quarter of fiscal 2016 included the withdrawal of the competitor protest of the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle ~~("JLTV") production contract awarded to the Company followed by the receipt of a $243 million order under the JLTV program for more than 650 vehicles, along with installed kits, related support~~(JLTV) and ~~a license of the JLTV technical data package. The defense segment also received a contract from an international customer for more than 1,000~~ Mine Resistant Ambush Protected - All Terrain ~~Vehicles (“M-ATVs”) during~~Vehicle (M-ATV) sales increases, more than offset single digit percentage sales declines in the ~~quarter. The Company is currently working with the customer to finalize the funding~~access equipment and ~~vehicle delivery schedule for the contract and, as a result, has not included any~~commercial segments. Access equipment segment sales under this contract in its fiscal 2016 outlook and has not included this contract in backlog at March 31, 2016. While not in backlog, the Company is procuring inventory to allow for production of the units.

~~Consolidated net sales decreased $29.9 million, or 1.9%, to $1.52 billion~~ in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 were down 4.1% compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. A near doubling of defense~~2016, which was better than the Company's expected full fiscal 2017 percentage sales decline for this segment. Commercial segment sales along with higher sales in both the fire & emergency and commercial segments almost completely offset a decline in access equipment segment sales. Compared to the prior year quarter, defense segment sales benefited from having a full quarter of Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles ("FHTV") sales and the delivery of the remaining international M-ATVs under a contract the Company received last summer. The Company experienced a break in production on the FHTVwere down 8.7% in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2016, with refuse collection vehicle sales down 20.5% as a ~~previous contract with~~result of order weakness experienced in the ~~DoD had concluded.~~first quarter of fiscal 2017.

Consolidated operating income decreased ~~16.7%~~12.0% to $80.4 million, or 5.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $91.4 million, or 6.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared~~2016. Second quarter fiscal 2017 results included $17.2 million of restructuring-related costs recorded in the access equipment segment as part of the restructuring plan announced in January 2017. Higher defense and fire & emergency segment results along with lower corporate expenses were more than offset by lower access equipment and commercial segment operating income.

In January 2017, as part of simplification activities in support of the Company’s MOVE strategy, the Company announced its intention to ~~$109.7~~rationalize operations in the access equipment segment. These plans include the closure of its manufacturing plant and pre-delivery inspection facilities in Belgium, the streamlining of telehandler product offerings to a reduced range in Europe, the transfer of remaining European telehandler manufacturing to the Company’s facility in Romania and reductions in engineering staff supporting European telehandlers, including the closure of the UK-based engineering facility. The announced plans also include the move of North American telehandler production from Ohio to facilities in Pennsylvania. In total, the Company expects these actions will result in ongoing savings of about $20 million ~~or 7.1%~~to $25 million per year. The Company expects to realize $15 million to $20 million of ~~sales,~~benefits in fiscal 2018 before achieving full run rate savings in fiscal 2019. The Company expects the pre-tax cost of implementing these actions will be approximately $45 million to $50 million, including approximately $10 million of non-cash charges. The Company expects to incur approximately $43 million of the cost of implementing these actions in fiscal 2017, of which it recognized $17.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. Improved~~2017.

As a result of the solid performance in the first half of the year and positive outlook for the remainder of the year, the Company increased its fiscal 2017 earnings per share estimate range from $2.50 to $2.90 to $2.70 to $3.00 on operating income ~~and~~of $372 million to $402 million. Excluding expected access equipment segment restructuring-related charges, the Company also increased its fiscal 2017 adjusted earnings per share estimate range from $3.00 to $3.40 to $3.20 to $3.50 on adjusted operating income ~~margins~~of $415 million to $445 million. Although the Company is only partially through the seasonally important Spring and early Summer time period, which typically drives how the segments with exposure to the construction season in the ~~defense, fire & emergency and commercial~~Northern Hemisphere will perform, the Company is encouraged by the strong backlogs in all of the segments ~~was not enough~~at March 31, 2017. Full year fiscal 2017 sales are now expected to ~~offset~~be $6.6 billion to $6.7 billion, compared to the Company's previous expectation of $6.5 billion to $6.7 billion.

The Company now expects access equipment segment fiscal 2017 sales to be approximately $2.8 billion, the high end of its previous range. The revised sales estimate for fiscal 2017 represents an estimated 7% decline from fiscal 2016 sales. The Company is also increasing its fiscal 2017 operating income ~~decline in~~margin outlook range for the access equipment segment from 6.15% to 6.95% to a range of 7.20% to 7.45%, reflecting both the higher sales estimate and an expected more favorable mix. Likewise, the Company also increased ~~start-up~~its adjusted operating income margin outlook range for this segment from 7.75% to 8.50% to a range of 8.75% to 9.00%.

The Company still expects fiscal 2017 defense segment sales to be approximately $1.85 billion. The Company is slightly increasing its fiscal 2017 defense segment operating income margin estimate, from 9.75% to 10.0%, reflecting stronger program execution.

The Company continues to believe fire & emergency segment fiscal 2017 sales will be approximately $1.0 billion with operating income margin of approximately 8.5%.

The Company still expects fiscal 2017 commercial segment sales to be approximately $975 million. The Company is reducing the commercial segment operating income margin expectation from 6.5% to a range of 5.0% to 5.5%, reflecting higher than previously expected inefficiencies related to a more pronounced production ramp from the first half to the second half of the year, a less favorable mix and a more challenging price/cost dynamic.

The Company is now estimating that fiscal 2017 corporate expenses atwill be approximately $145 million, compared to the previous expectation of a ~~shared production facility~~range of $140 million to $145 million.

The Company expects higher consolidated sales in ~~Mexico.~~the third quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the prior year quarter as it expects higher defense and, to a lesser extent, fire & emergency segment sales to offset the impact of continued lower access equipment segment sales and lower expected commercial segment operating income margins. The Company expects higher earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016.

Results of Operations

Analysis of Consolidated Net Sales

The following table presents net sales by business segment (in millions):


	Second Quarter Fiscal						First Six Months Fiscal						Second Quarter Fiscal						First Six Months Fiscal
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net sales:
Access equipment	$	754.3		$	981.8		$	1,284.1		$	1,698.5		$	723.2		$	754.3		$	1,212.4		$	1,284.1
Defense	297.0			158.7			615.0			428.0			446.1			297.0			740.6			615.0
Fire & emergency	240.4			202.9			447.9			369.9			237.5			240.4			470.0			447.9
Commercial	236.7			220.9			437.0			431.1			216.0			236.7			415.2			437.0
Intersegment eliminations and other	(4.1		)	(10.1		)	(7.7		)	(20.0		)	(4.5		)	(4.1		)	(8.5		)	(7.7		)
	$	1,524.3		$	1,554.2		$	2,776.3		$	2,907.5		$	1,618.3		$	1,524.3		$	2,829.7		$	2,776.3

Second Quarter Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Consolidated net sales ~~decreased $29.9~~increased $94.0 million, or ~~1.9%~~6.2%, to ~~$1.52~~$1.62 billion in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. Improved~~2016. A significant increase in sales in the defense ~~fire & emergency and commercial~~ segment ~~sales almost completely~~was offset in part by lower sales in the access equipment ~~segment.~~and commercial segments.

Access equipment segment net sales decreased ~~$227.5~~$31.1 million, or ~~23.2%~~4.1%, to ~~$754.3~~$723.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The decline in sales was primarily due to ~~the slowdown~~lower telehandler sales volumes in North ~~American replacement demand that began~~America and Europe (down $54 million) and a more competitive pricing environment (down $10 million), offset in ~~the summer~~part by higher sales of ~~fiscal 2015~~used equipment and lower shipments of telehandlers in North America. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, the access equipment segment experienced a large increase in telehandler sales related to the transition to Tier 4 engines.service (up $14 million).

Defense segment net sales increased ~~$138.3~~$149.1 million, or ~~87.1%~~50.2%, to ~~$297.0~~$446.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The increase in sales was primarily due to ~~increased~~the ramp-up of sales ~~of FHTVs and international M-ATVs under a contract~~to the ~~Company received last summer. The Company experienced a break in production~~U.S. government under the ~~FHTV~~JLTV program and higher international M-ATV sales under the international contract award received in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016.

Fire & emergency segment net sales ~~increased $37.5~~decreased $2.9 million, or ~~18.5%~~1.2%, to ~~$240.4~~$237.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. Sales~~2016. The decrease in sales was primarily due to lower Airport Products unit volume (down $9 million), primarily due to the ~~second quarter~~timing of ~~fiscal 2016 benefited from higher domestic fire apparatus~~international deliveries, as a result of increased production rates to meet higher demand and the delivery of a multi-unit international order. Improved operational efficiencies have allowed the fire & emergency segment to increase and maintain higher production rates.offset in part by improved pricing (up $8 million).

Commercial segment net sales ~~increased $15.8~~decreased $20.7 million, or ~~7.1%~~8.7%, to ~~$236.7~~$216.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in sales was primarily ~~attributable~~due to ~~higher~~lower refuse collection vehicle unit ~~volume driven~~volumes (down $34 million), offset in part by ~~fleet replenishment by private waste haulers and share gains.~~higher package sales, which include third-party chassis (up $10 million).

First Six Months of Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Consolidated net sales ~~decreased $131.2~~increased $53.4 million, or ~~4.5%~~1.9%, to ~~$2.78~~$2.83 billion in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. Higher~~2016. An increase in sales in the defense and fire & emergency segments ~~and, to a lesser extent, the commercial segment were not sufficient to~~was offset ~~a decline~~ in part by lower sales in the access equipment ~~segment. The strengthening U.S. dollar negatively impacted~~and commercial segments.

Access equipment segment net salesdecreased $71.7 million, or 5.6%, to $1.21 billion in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016 by $20.7 million, or 70 basis points,~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The decline in sales was primarily due to lower telehandler sales volumes in North America and Europe (down $72 million).

~~Access equipment~~Defense segment net sales ~~decreased $414.4~~increased $125.6 million, or ~~24.4%~~20.4%, to ~~$1.28 billion~~$740.6 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~decline~~increase in sales was primarily due to higher sales of heavy tactical wheeled vehicles to the ~~slowdown in North American replacement demand that began in~~U.S. government and the ~~third quarter~~ramp-up of ~~fiscal 2015 and~~sales under the JLTV program, offset by lower ~~shipments~~international sales of ~~telehandlers in North America. In~~M-ATVs. During the first six months of fiscal ~~2015, the access equipment~~2016, production of heavy tactical wheeled vehicles was ramping back up after a break in production experienced in fiscal 2015.

Fire & emergency segment ~~experienced a large increase in telehandler~~net sales ~~related to the transition to Tier 4 engines. A stronger U.S. dollar negatively impacted sales by $17.3~~increased $22.1 million, or ~~100 basis points,~~4.9%, to $470.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The increase in sales was primarily due to improved pricing (up $13 million) and the sale of higher content units (up $7 million).

~~Defense~~Commercial segment net sales ~~increased $187.0~~decreased $21.8 million, or ~~43.7%~~5.0%, to ~~$615.0~~$415.2 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in sales was primarily due to the sale of international M-ATVs under a contract the Company received last summer. Sales to the DoD were relatively unchanged in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015, as higher M-ATV reset and FHTV sales were offset by lower ~~FMTV sales.~~

Fire & emergency segment net sales increased $78.0 million, or 21.1%, to $447.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015. Sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 benefited from higher domestic fire apparatus deliveries and the delivery of several multi-unit international orders. Improved operational efficiencies have allowed the fire & emergency segment to increase fire apparatus production rates to meet increased demand.

Commercial segment net sales increased $5.9 million, or 1.4%, to $437.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015. The increase in sales was primarily attributable to higher refuse collection vehicle unit volume (down $57 million), offset in part by ~~lower package~~ sales ~~consisting~~ of ~~a purchased chassis~~higher content units (up $22 million) and ~~manufactured body, and lower~~higher concrete mixer unit ~~volume.~~volume (up $6 million).

Analysis of Consolidated Cost of Sales

The following table presents cost of sales by business segment (in millions):


	Second Quarter Fiscal					First Six Months Fiscal					Second Quarter Fiscal					First Six Months Fiscal
	2016		2015			2016		2015			2017			2016		2017			2016
Cost of sales:
Access equipment	$	608.9	$	767.9		$	1,051.4	$	1,335.6		$	604.7		$	608.9	$	1,004.2		$	1,051.4
Defense	250.1		153.8			524.7		394.8			374.5			250.1		623.4			524.7
Fire & emergency	208.4		177.5			389.2		326.5			196.3			208.4		394.5			389.2
Commercial	194.8		188.8			363.6		364.8			185.6			194.8		355.5			363.6
Intersegment eliminations and other	2.8		(9.6		)	5.3		(19.7		)	(4.1		)	2.8		(8.9		)	5.3
	$	1,265.0	$	1,278.4		$	2,334.2	$	2,402.0		$	1,357.0		$	1,265.0	$	2,368.7		$	2,334.2

Second Quarter Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Consolidated cost of sales was $1.36 billion, or 83.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $1.27 billion, or 83.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $1.28 billion, or 82.3% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The 7090 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was largely due to ~~a favorable vendor recovery settlement~~restructuring-related charges incurred in the access equipment segment ~~in the second quarter of the prior year (60~~(110 basis points) ~~and start-up costs related to a shared production facility in Mexico (40 basis points)~~.

Access equipment segment cost of sales was $604.7 million, or 83.6% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $608.9 million, or 80.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $767.9 million, or 78.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The ~~250~~290 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was largely due to restructuring-related costs (240 basis points) and a more competitive pricing environment ~~(120~~(100 basis points) ~~and adverse manufacturing absorption (90 basis points) associated with lower production~~, offset in ~~the current year and a favorable vendor recovery settlement in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 (80~~part by improved product mix (70 basis points).

Defense segment cost of sales was $374.5 million, or 83.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $250.1 million, or 84.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $153.8 million, or 97.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The 1,280 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percent of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to favorable product mix (920 basis points), contractual price increases (310 basis points) and improved absorption of fixed costs (240 basis points), offset in part by costs associated with a specific warranty campaign (210 basis points).

Fire & emergency segment cost of sales was $208.4 million, or 86.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to $177.5 million, or 87.5% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The 80 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percent of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to improved production efficiencies and absorption (90 basis points).

Commercial segment cost of sales was $194.8 million, or 82.3% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to $188.8 million, or 85.4% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The 31030 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was primarily attributable to improved absorption as a result of increased production (320 basis points) and favorable warranty performance (80 basis points), offset in part by adverse product mix (350 basis points).

Fire & emergency segment cost of sales was $196.3 million, or 82.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $208.4 million, or 86.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The 400 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2016 was primarily attributable to improved pricing (260 basis points) and improved product mix (140 basis points).

Commercial segment cost of sales was $185.6 million, or 85.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $194.8 million, or 82.3% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The 360 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2016 was largely due to under absorption as a result of lower production (130 basis points), adverse product mix (70 basis points), increased warranty reserves (80 basis points) and costs related to an accident at one of its manufacturing facilities (50 basis points).

Intersegment eliminations and other includes intercompany profit on inter-segment sales not yet sold to third party customers, net of start-up costs of a corporate-led manufacturing facility not allocated to segments.

First Six Months of Fiscal 2017 Compared to 2016

Consolidated cost of sales was $2.37 billion, or 83.7% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $2.33 billion, or 84.1% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016. The 40 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was largely due to improved absorption in the defense segment as a result of increased production (80 basis points) and improved operating results related to a corporate-led manufacturing facility which was incurring start-up costs during the first six months of fiscal 2016 (40 basis points), offset in part by restructuring-related costs incurred in the access equipment segment (50 basis points).

Access equipment segment cost of sales was $1.00 billion, or 82.8% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $1.05 billion, or 81.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016. The 90 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was largely due to restructuring-related costs (140 basis points) and a more competitive pricing environment (110 basis points), offset in part by favorable product mix ~~(200~~(70 basis points), the timing of new product development spending (30 basis points) and more efficient material usage (50 basis points).

Defense segment cost of sales was $623.4 million, or 84.2% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $524.7 million, or 85.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016. The 110 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily attributable to improved absorption as a result of increased production (120 basis points) and favorable contract performance on multi-year contracts (40 basis points), offset in part by adverse product mix (130 basis points).

Fire & emergency segment cost of sales was $394.5 million, or 83.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $389.2 million, or 86.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016. The 300 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was largely due to ~~lower package sales~~improved pricing (220 basis points) and improved product mix (70 basis points).

Commercial segment cost of sales was $355.5 million, or 85.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $363.6 million, or 83.2% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016. The 240 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was largely due to under absorption as a result of lower production ~~absorption~~(130 basis points) and adverse product mix (90 basis points).

Intersegment eliminations and other includes intercompany profit on inter-segment sales not yet sold to third party customers as well as shared manufacturing ~~plant start-up costs not allocated to segments.~~

~~First Six Months of Fiscal 2016 Compared to 2015~~

Consolidated cost of sales was $2.33 billion, or 84.1% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to $2.40 billion, or 82.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The 150 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was largely due to adverse production absorption associated with lower production in the access equipment segment and start-up costs to ramp-up production levels in the defense segment (combined 70 basis points) and start-up costs related to a shared production facility in Mexico (50 basis points).

Access equipment segment cost of sales was $1.05 billion, or 81.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to $1.34 billion, or 78.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The 330 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was largely due to adverse manufacturing absorption (180 basis points) associated with lower production and a more competitive pricing environment (90 basis points) in the current year period and a favorable vendor recovery settlement in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 (50 basis points).

Defense segment cost of sales was $524.7 million, or 85.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to $394.8 million, or 92.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The 700 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percent of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to favorable product mix (500 basis points) and contractual price increases (370 basis points), offset in part by costs associated with a specific warranty campaign (80 basis points) and the absence of a pension and other postretirement curtailment benefit recorded in the first six months of fiscal 2015 (70 basis points).

Fire & emergency segment cost of sales was $389.2 million, or 86.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to $326.5 million, or 88.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The 140 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percent of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to favorable pricing (110 basis points) and improved production efficiencies and absorption (80 basis points).

Commercial segment cost of sales was $363.6 million, or 83.2% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to $364.8 million, or 84.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The 140 basis point decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was largely due to favorable product mix (180 basis points) due to lower package sales, offset in part by increased warranty costs (50 basis points).

~~Intersegment eliminations and other includes intercompany profit on inter-segment sales not yet sold to third party customers as well as shared manufacturing plant~~ start-up costs not allocated to segments.

Analysis of Consolidated Operating Income (Loss)

The following table presents operating income (loss) by business segment (in millions):


	Second Quarter Fiscal						First Six Months Fiscal						Second Quarter Fiscal						First Six Months Fiscal
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Operating income (loss):
Access equipment	$	75.7		$	136.9		$	96.1		$	214.1		$	42.1		$	75.7		$	66.5		$	96.1
Defense	27.8			(12.0		)	51.0			(2.2		)	48.7			27.8			72.5			51.0
Fire & emergency	14.9			9.0			25.0			10.5			21.8			14.9			38.8			25.0
Commercial	17.2			8.6			26.1			21.0			6.0			17.2			10.6			26.1
Corporate	(44.2		)	(32.8		)	(76.5		)	(68.1		)	(38.2		)	(44.2		)	(71.8		)	(76.5		)
Intersegment eliminations	—			—			—			0.1			—			—			—			—
	$	91.4		$	109.7		$	121.7		$	175.4		$	80.4		$	91.4		$	116.6		$	121.7

Second Quarter Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Consolidated operating income decreased ~~16.7%~~12.0% to $80.4 million, or 5.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $91.4 million, or 6.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $109.7 million, or 7.1% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The ~~decline~~decrease in operating income in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was ~~driven by lower~~primarily the result of $17.2 million of restructuring-related charges in the access equipment ~~segment sales and higher corporate costs, offset in part by improved performance in the defense, fire & emergency and commercial segments.~~segment.

Access equipment segment operating income decreased ~~44.7%~~44.4% to $42.1 million, or 5.8% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $75.7 million, or 10.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $136.9 million, or 13.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The decrease in operating income in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was primarily the result of ~~the lower gross income associated with lower sales volume (down $59 million) and~~restructuring-related charges of $17.2 million. In addition, a ~~challenging~~more competitive pricing environment (down ~~$11~~$10 million), ~~adverse manufacturing absorption ($3~~higher selling, general and administrative salaries (up $6 million) asand increased trade show expenses (up $4 million) all contributed to the ~~business significantly reduced production rates~~decrease in operating income in the access equipment segment in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the ~~prior year~~second quarter ~~and the impact~~ of ~~a prior year benefit associated with a favorable vendor recovery settlement $7.8 million, offset in part by lower spending on engine emissions standards changes (down $10 million).~~fiscal 2016.

Defense segment operating income increased ~~333.0%~~75.2% to $48.7 million, or 10.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $27.8 million, or 9.4% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to an~~2016. The increase in operating ~~loss of $12.0 million, or 7.5% of sales,~~income in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. The increase in operating results in the second quarter of fiscal 2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was largely due to higher gross income associated with higher sales volume (up ~~$21~~$32 million) and ~~favorable~~improved manufacturing absorption as a result of higher sales (up $6 million), offset in part by adverse product ~~mix.~~mix (down $13 million) and higher incentive compensation expense (up $3 million).

Fire & emergency segment operating income increased ~~66.0%~~46.3% to $21.8 million, or 9.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $14.9 million, or 6.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $9.0 million, or 4.4% of sales,~~2016. The increase in operating income in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. The increase in operating results in the second quarter of fiscal 2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was ~~largely due to higher gross income on higher sales volume~~primarily a result of improved pricing (up $8 million).

Commercial segment operating income ~~increased 99.0%~~decreased 65.1% to $6.0 million, or 2.8% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $17.2 million, or 7.3% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $8.6 million, or 3.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating income in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was primarily a result of ~~improved product mix and higher~~lower gross income associated with ~~higher~~lower sales volume (down $8 million) and under absorption as a result of lower production (up $4$2 million). Commercial segment second quarter fiscal 2017 results also included $1.3 million of costs related to the accident at one of its manufacturing facilities.

Corporate operating ~~loss increased $11.4~~costs decreased $6.0 million to ~~$44.2~~$38.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in corporate operating ~~loss~~costs in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was primarily due to ~~increased~~improved operating results related to a corporate-led manufacturing facility, which incurred higher start-up costs ~~to support~~during the ~~start-up~~second quarter of ~~a shared production facility (up $8 million) and higher health care costs.~~

fiscal 2016.

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased ~~1.2%~~9.8% to $169.8 million, or 10.5% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $154.7 million, or 10.1% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $152.8 million, or 9.8% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The increase in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was generally a result of higher incentive compensation expense, increased ~~medical costs, offset in part by reductions in travel~~salaries and ~~outside services spending.~~higher trade show costs.

First Six Months of Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Consolidated operating income decreased ~~30.6%~~4.2% to ~~$121.7~~$116.6 million, or ~~4.4%~~4.1% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$175.4~~$121.7 million, or ~~6.0%~~4.4% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. The decline in operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was driven by $17.2 million of restructuring-related charges in the access equipment segment, lower gross ~~income~~margin associated with lower access equipment segment sales, lower performance in the commercial segment and ~~start-up costs associated with a shared production facility in Mexico,~~higher incentive compensation expense, offset in part by higher gross margin associated with higher defense segment sales, improved performance in the ~~defense,~~ fire & emergency segment and ~~commercial segments.~~lower start-up costs of a corporate-led manufacturing facility.

Access equipment segment operating income decreased ~~55.1%~~30.8% to ~~$96.1~~$66.5 million, or 5.5% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $96.1 million, or 7.5% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2016. The decline in operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to ~~$214.1~~the first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily the result of restructuring-related charges of $17.2 million. In addition, a more competitive pricing environment (down $17 million), lower gross income associated with lower sales volume (down $14 million) and higher selling, general and administrative salaries (up $6 million) were offset in part by a favorable product mix (up $11 million).

Defense segment operating income increased 42.2% to $72.5 million, or ~~12.6%~~9.8% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. The decrease in operating income was primarily the result of the lower gross income associated with lower sales volume (down $112 million) and a challenging pricing environment (down $15 million), offset in part by lower spending (down $17 million) on engine emissions standards changes. Results for the first six months of fiscal 2015 also benefited from a $7.8 million vendor recovery settlement.

~~Defense segment operating income increased 2,462.2%~~2017 compared to $51.0 million, or 8.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2016. The increase in operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to anthe first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily the result of higher gross margin associated with higher sales volume (up $27 million) and improved absorption as a result of higher production (up $5 million), offset in part by adverse product mix (down $10 million).

Fire & emergency segment operating ~~loss of $2.2~~income increased 55.2% to $38.8 million, or ~~0.5%~~8.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015. Defense segment results for the first six months of fiscal 2015 included a $3.4 million other postretirement curtailment benefit. The increase in operating income was largely due to favorable product mix and higher gross income associated with higher sales (up $29 million).

~~Fire & emergency segment operating income increased 138.0%~~2017 compared to $25.0 million, or 5.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2016. The increase in operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to ~~$10.5~~the first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily the result of improved pricing (up $13 million).

Commercial segment operating income decreased 59.4% to $10.6 million, or ~~2.8%~~2.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. Higher gross income on higher sales volume was the largest contributor to the increase in operating income.~~

~~Commercial segment operating income increased 24.1%~~2017 compared to $26.1 million, or 6.0% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2016. The decrease in operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to ~~$21.0~~the first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily a result of lower gross margin associated with lower sales volume (down $12 million) and under absorption as a result of lower production (up $4 million). Commercial segment results in the first six months of fiscal 2017 also included $1.3 million of costs related to the accident at one of its manufacturing facilities.

Corporate operating costs decreased $4.7 million to $71.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016. The decrease in corporate operating costs in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2016 was primarily due to improved operating results related to a corporate-led manufacturing facility which incurred higher start-up costs during the first six months of fiscal 2016, offset in part by higher incentive and share-based compensation expense (up $7 million) in the first six months of fiscal 2017.

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased 9.1% to $320.8 million, or ~~4.9%~~11.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. The increase in operating income was primarily a result of higher gross income associated with higher sales volume (up $2 million) and favorable product mix.~~

~~Corporate operating loss increased $8.4 million to $76.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015. The increase in corporate operating loss in the first six months of fiscal 2016 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2015 was primarily due to increased costs to support the start-up of a shared production facility in Mexico (up $14 million), offset by lower information technology expense (down $3 million).

~~Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 3.1%~~ to $294.0 million, or 10.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $303.3 million, or 10.4% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2015.~~2016. The ~~reduction~~increase in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015~~2016 was generally a result of ~~reductions in travel and outside services spending and lower~~higher incentive compensation ~~offset in part by~~expense, increased ~~medical~~salaries and higher trade show costs.

Analysis of Non-Operating Income Statement Items

Second Quarter Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Interest expense net of interest income decreased ~~$13.1~~$1.0 million to ~~$15.1~~$14.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015. The decrease in interest expense net~~2016.

Other miscellaneous income of ~~interest income was primarily due to $14.7~~$1.2 million of debt extinguishment costs the Company incurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 in connection with the refinancing of portions of the Company’s long-term debt. The benefit of lower interest rates on the senior notes refinanced in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015 was more than offset by increased borrowings to support increased working capital.~~

~~Other~~2017 and other miscellaneous expense of $1.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 ~~and other miscellaneous income of $1.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015~~ primarily related to net foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$20.3~~$23.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, or ~~27.0%~~35.0% of pre-tax income, compared to ~~$29.5~~$20.3 million, or ~~35.7%,~~27.0% of pre-tax income, in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. Results for the second

quarter of fiscal 2017 were favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits, largely related to excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (260 basis points). Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2016 were favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits related to a change in a filing position on the Company's fiscal 2015 income tax return and reduction in liability related to expiration of statutes of limitations (580 basis points). Further, the reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit favorably benefited the second quarter of fiscal 2016 by 100 basis points. ~~Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 were adversely impacted by a change in estimated full year tax rate (170 basis points).~~

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $0.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and $1.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 ~~and $1.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015~~ primarily represented the Company’s equity interest in a commercial entity in Mexico and a joint venture in Europe.

First Six Months of Fiscal ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016

Interest expense net of interest income decreased ~~$12.6~~$1.2 million to ~~$29.2~~$28.0 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. The Company incurred $14.7~~2016.

Other miscellaneous income of $2.5 million ~~of debt extinguishment costs~~ in ~~connection with the refinancing of portions of the Company’s long-term debt during~~ the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. The benefit of lower interest rates on the senior notes refinanced in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 was offset by increased borrowings to support increased working capital.~~

~~Other~~2017 and other miscellaneous expense of $1.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016primarily related to net foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$22.0~~$28.8 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, or ~~24.1%~~31.6% of pre-tax income, compared to ~~$45.7~~$22.0 million, or ~~34.2%,~~24.1% of pre-tax income, in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. Results for the first six months of fiscal 2017 were favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits, largely related to state tax matters (230 basis points) and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (220 basis points). Results for the first six months of fiscal 2016 were favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits, including a change in filing position on the Company's 2015 federal income tax return (380 basis points), the retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit (260 basis points) and reductions in reserves for uncertain tax benefits (220 basis points), related to interest and expiration of statutes of limitations. Results for the first six months of fiscal 2016 also include the ~~on-going~~ongoing benefit of the U.S. research and development tax credit (100 basis points). ~~Results for~~

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $1.2 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015 were impacted by discrete tax benefits (160 basis points) resulting from the reinstatement of the U.S. research~~2017 and ~~development tax credit and other discrete tax charges (80 basis points).~~

~~Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of~~ $1.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016 ~~and $1.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2015~~ primarily represented the ~~Company’s~~Company's equity interest in a commercial entity in Mexico and a joint venture in Europe.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Financial Condition at March 31, 2016~~

~~The Company’s capitalization was as follows (in millions):~~

March 31, September 30,
2016 2015
Cash and cash equivalents $ 38.4
$ 42.9
Total debt 1,000.7
938.5
Shareholders’ equity 1,874.4
1,911.1
Total capitalization (debt plus equity) 2,875.1
2,849.6
Debt to total capitalization 34.8 % 32.9 %

The Company generates significant capital resources from operating activities, which is the expected primary source of funding for its operations. Other resources of liquidity are available under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in “Liquidity”) and available cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$38.4 million, a majority of which is located in the United States.~~$413.4 million. The Company expects to meet its fiscal ~~2016~~2017 U.S. funding needs without repatriating undistributed profits that are indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. In addition to cash and cash equivalents, the Company had ~~$604.8~~$749.5 million of unused available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility ~~(as defined in “Liquidity”)~~ as of March 31,

~~2016.~~ 2017. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility could, as discussed below, be limited by the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (as defined in “Liquidity”).

~~The Company's ratio~~ These sources of ~~debt~~liquidity are needed to ~~total capitalization of 34.8% at March 31, 2016 remained within its targeted range. The Company's capital structure in the first six months of fiscal 2016 was impacted by~~fund the Company's ~~repurchase of 2.5 million shares of its Common Stock in the period at an aggregate cost of $100.1 million.~~working capital requirements, debt service requirements, capital expenditures, share repurchases and dividends. As of March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had approximately 7.5 million shares of Common Stock remaining under the repurchase authorization approved by the Company's Board of Directors in August 2015. The Company does not expect to repurchase any shares of Common Stock under this authorization during fiscal 2017.

Financial Condition at March 31, 2017

The Company’s capitalization was as follows (in millions):



	March 31,			September 30,
	2017			2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	413.4		$	321.9
Total debt	827.1			846.2
Total shareholders’ equity	2,033.3			1,976.5
Total capitalization (debt plus equity)	2,860.4			2,822.7
Debt to total capitalization	28.9		%	30.0		%

The Company's ratio of debt to total capitalization of 28.9% at March 31, 2017 remained within its targeted range.

Consolidated days sales outstanding (defined as “Trade Receivables” at quarter end divided by “Net Sales” for the most recent quarter multiplied by 90 days) ~~increased from 50~~were 49 days at both September 30, ~~2015 to 58 days at~~2016 and March 31, ~~2016. The increase in days sales outstanding is primarily related to the defense segment.~~2017. Days sales outstanding for segments other than the defense segment increased ~~one day,~~ from 5351 days at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 to 54 days at March 31, 2016. Days sales outstanding in the defense segment increased from 38 days at September 30, 2015 to 75 days at March 31, 2016 as the Company is experiencing a slowdown in payments from its international customers.2017. Consolidated inventory turns (defined as “Cost of Sales” on an annualized basis, divided by the average “Inventory” at the past five quarter end periods) decreased from ~~4.3~~4.1 times at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 to ~~3.5~~3.7 times at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 as a result of the ~~decline~~Company building inventory in ~~sales during~~its defense segment in anticipation of M-ATV vehicle deliveries under the ~~first six months~~international contract award received in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 ~~on relatively consistent~~and seasonal build of inventory levels. The Company has commitments to purchase materials and components based on future delivery requirements under international contracts. If the Company is not successful in securing timely funding for these contracts, working capital could increase. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to fund these working capital requirements in the ~~event that funding under the international contracts is delayed.~~access equipment segment.

Cash Flows

Operating Cash Flows

Operating activities generated ~~$94.5~~$148.1 million of cash in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~a net use of cash of $70.7~~$96.0 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. Cash used by operating activities in~~2016. During the first six months of fiscal ~~2015 was primarily due to~~2017, increases in inventory ~~build~~ in the access equipment ~~segment.~~and defense segments were offset in part by higher customer advances and accounts payable.

Investing Cash Flows

Investing activities used cash of $33.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2017 compared to $37.9 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016 compared to $73.4~~2016. Capital spending, excluding equipment held for rental, of $28.0 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015. Capital spending, excluding equipment held for rental, of $40.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2016~~2017 reflected a decrease of ~~$29.5~~$12.3 million compared to capital spending in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015 largely as a result of investments the Company made in its vertical integration strategy in the first six months of fiscal 2015.~~2016. In fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, the Company expects capital spending to be approximately $100 million.

Financing Cash Flows

Financing activities ~~resulted in a net use of~~used cash of ~~$63.1~~$21.1 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~a net use of cash of $119.0~~$64.6 million in the first six months of fiscal ~~2015.~~2016. In the first six months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company repurchased shares of its Common Stock ~~under its share repurchase authorization~~ at an aggregate cost of ~~$100.1~~$3.0 million and ~~$88.1~~$101.6 million, respectively. During the first six months of fiscal 2016, the Company utilized net proceeds under the Revolving Credit Facility of $68.7 million to fund capital needs and stock repurchases. The Company prepaid all fiscal 2017 mandatory payments on its term loan during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. In addition, the Company also received $33.2 million of cash from the exercise of stock options during the first six months of fiscal 2017, whereas only $1.9 million was received in the first six months of fiscal 2016.

Liquidity

The Company's primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations, availability under the Revolving Credit Facility and available cash and cash equivalents. In addition to cash and cash equivalents of $38.4 million, a majority of which is located in the United States, the Company had $604.8 million of unused availability under the Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2016. These sources of liquidity are needed to fund the Company's working capital requirements, debt service requirements, capital expenditures, share repurchases and dividends. The Company expects to have sufficient liquidity to finance its operations over the next twelve months.

Senior Secured Credit Agreement

In March 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with various lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a revolving credit facility ~~(“Revolving~~(Revolving Credit ~~Facility”)~~Facility) that matures in March 2019 with an initial maximum aggregate amount of availability of ~~$600.0~~$600 million and (ii) a ~~$400.0~~$400 million term loan due in quarterly principal installments of ~~$5.0~~$5 million with a balloon payment of ~~$310.0~~$310 million due at maturity in March 2019. In January 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with lenders under the Credit Agreement that increased the Revolving Credit Facility ~~by $250.0 million~~ to an aggregate maximum amount of ~~$850.0~~$850 million. Refer to Note 87 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Credit Agreement.

Covenant Compliance

The Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

With certain exceptions, the Company may elect to have the collateral pledged in connection with the Credit Agreement released during any period that the Company maintains an investment grade corporate family rating from either Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group or Moody’s Investor Service Inc. During any such period when the collateral has been released, the Company’s leverage ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter must not be greater than 3.75 to 1.0, and the Company would not be subject to any additional requirement to limit its senior secured leverage ratio.

The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and expects to be able to meet the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement over the next twelve months.


i.	50% of the consolidated net income of the Company and its subsidiaries (or if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), accrued on a cumulative basis during the period beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of the applicable proposed dividend or distribution; and


ii.	100% of the aggregate net proceeds received by the Company subsequent to March 3, 2010 either as a contribution to its common equity capital or from the issuance and sale of its Common Stock.

Senior Notes

In February 2014, the Company issued $250.0 million of 5.375% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”). In March 2015, the Company issued $250.0 million of 5.375% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”). The proceeds of both ~~notes~~note issuances were used to repay existing outstanding notes of the Company. The Company has the option to redeem the 2022 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes for a premium after March 1, 2017 and March 1, 2020, respectively.

Refer to Note 87 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s outstanding debt as of March 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company's contractual obligations, commercial commitments and off-balance sheet arrangement disclosures in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 have not materially changed since that report was filed.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. The Company's disclosures of critical accounting policies in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 have not materially changed since that report was filed.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company's disclosures of critical accounting estimates in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 have not materially changed since that report was filed.

New Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of new accounting standards.

Customers and Backlog

Sales to the U.S. government comprised approximately ~~20%~~23% of the Company’s net sales in the first six months of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales for this period. A significant portion of the Company’s net sales are derived from customer orders prior to commencing production.

The Company’s backlog at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~58.2%~~10.9% to ~~$3.54~~$3.93 billion compared to ~~$2.24~~$3.54 billion at March 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Access equipment segment backlog increased ~~1.6%~~11.0% to $737.9 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $664.8 million at March 31, 2016 ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~$654.1 million at March 31, 2015.~~improved market conditions in North America. Defense segment backlog increased ~~192.8%~~8.8% to $1.83 billion at March 31, 2017 compared to $1.68 billion at March 31, 2016 ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~$573.9 million at March 31, 2015 due largely to new domestic~~the receipt of a large international contract ~~awards.~~for the delivery of M-ATVs in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and increased funding for the JLTV program. Fire & emergency segment backlog increased ~~26.2%~~11.3% to $1.01 billion at March 31, 2017 compared to $903.4 million at March 31, ~~2016 compared~~2016. The fire & emergency segment experienced very strong orders in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, some of which were likely related to ~~$716.1~~the timing of a February 1 price increase at Pierce. Commercial segment backlog increased 22.2% to $353.8 million at March 31, ~~2015 due primarily to increased orders for domestic fire apparatus as a result of market growth and share gains. Commercial segment backlog decreased 0.8%~~2017 compared to $289.4 million at March 31, ~~2016 compared to $291.8 million at March 31, 2015.~~2016. Unit backlog for concrete mixers ~~was down 0.1% at~~and refuse collection vehicles as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017 was up 4.7% and 23.4%, respectively, compared to March 31, ~~2015. Unit backlog for refuse collection vehicles was up 4.3% at March 31, 2016 compared to March 31, 2015.~~2016. The commercial segment experienced a rebound in orders in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 as a result of an atypical order pattern that resulted in customers ordering later in the fiscal year.

Reported backlog excludes purchase options and announced orders for which definitive contracts have not been executed. Backlog information and comparisons thereof as of different dates may not be accurate indicators of future sales or the ratio of the Company’s future sales to the DoD versus its sales to other customers. Approximately ~~43%~~31% of the Company’s March 31, ~~2016~~2017 backlog is not expected to be filled in fiscal ~~2016.~~ 2017.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The ~~Company's 2016 backlog excludes a contract award from an international customer for over 1,000 M-ATVs as~~Company is forecasting operating income and earnings per share excluding items that affect comparability. When the Company ~~works~~forecasts operating income and earnings per share, excluding items, these are considered non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes excluding the impact of these items is useful to investors to allow a more accurate comparison of the Company's operating performance to prior year results. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, the Company's results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The table below presents a reconciliation of the ~~customer~~Company's presented non-GAAP measures to ~~finalize funding and vehicle delivery schedules.~~the most directly comparable GAAP measures (in millions, except per share amounts):



	Fiscal 2017 Expectations
	Low			High

Adjusted access equipment segment operating income margin (non-GAAP)	8.75		%	9.00		%
Restructuring-related costs	(1.55		)	(1.55		)
Access equipment segment operating income margin (GAAP)	7.20		%	7.45		%

Adjusted consolidated operating income (non-GAAP)	$	415		$	445
Restructuring-related costs	(43		)	(43		)
Consolidated operating income (GAAP)	$	372		$	402

Adjusted effective income tax rate (non-GAAP)	33.0		%	32.5		%
Impact of restructuring-related costs on the effective income tax rate	2.9			2.9
Effective income tax rate (GAAP)	35.9		%	35.4		%

Adjusted earnings per share-diluted (non-GAAP)	$	3.20		$	3.50
Restructuring-related costs, net of tax	(0.50		)	(0.50		)
Earnings per share-diluted (GAAP)	$	2.70		$	3.00

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for changes in interest rates and commodity risk, which are incorporated by reference to Item 7A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, have not materially changed since that report was filed.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, the Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows are subject to various risks, many of which are not exclusively within the Company’s control, which may cause actual performance to differ materially from historical or projected future performance. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, which have not materially changed other than as reflected below.

~~Certain~~We expect to incur costs and charges as a result of restructuring of facilities or operations that we expect will reduce on-going costs. These actions may be disruptive to our business and may not result in anticipated cost savings.

Periodically we restructure facilities and operations in an effort to make our business more efficient. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 we announced our plan to outsource aftermarket parts distribution in the access equipment segment to a third party logistics company. In January 2017, we announced plans to close our access equipment manufacturing plant and pre-delivery inspection facilities in Belgium, the streamlining of telehandler product offerings to a reduced range in Europe, the transfer of remaining European telehandler manufacturing to our facility in Romania and reduce engineering staff supporting European telehandlers, including the closure of our ~~markets~~UK-based engineering facility. The announced plans also include the move of North American telehandler production from Ohio to facilities in Pennsylvania. We expect implementation costs for these actions to be between $45 million and $50 million, pre-tax, including approximately $10 million of non-cash charges. We recognized $17.2 million of restructuring-related costs in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and expect to recognize the majority of the remaining costs to implement these actions in fiscal 2017. In the future, we may incur additional costs, asset impairments and restructuring charges in connection with such consolidations, workforce reductions and other cost reduction measures that have adversely affected, and to the extent incurred in the future would adversely affect, our future earnings and cash flows. This is particularly true in our commercial segment where additional restructuring actions may be required as a result of challenging market conditions we are ~~highly cyclical. Declines~~experiencing in this segment. Such actions may be disruptive to our business. This may result in production inefficiencies, product quality issues, late product deliveries or lost orders as we begin production at consolidated facilities or outsource activities to third parties, which would adversely impact our sales levels, operating results and operating margins. Furthermore, we may not realize the cost savings that we expect to realize as a result of such actions.

The explosion and fire in one of our Dodge Center, Minnesota production facilities in January 2017 may impact our expectations of future results in our Commercial Segment.

In January 2017, we experienced an explosion and fire in one of our production facilities in our commercial segment that injured five team members and resulted in a partial shutdown of our production facility. We maintain workers’ compensation, property/casualty and business interruption insurance for situations like these, subject to customary deductible/self-retention amounts. To the extent that the accident adversely impacts our ability to achieve our operating plan and/or results in costs that are not covered by insurance, our expected financial results may be adversely impacted. Further, if the accident adversely impacts our production capacity for an extended period of time and we are not able to make appropriate adjustments, the result may be a loss of business.

Changes in the tax regimes and related government policies and regulations in the countries in which we operate could adversely affect our results and our effective tax rate.

As a multinational corporation, we are subject to various taxes in both U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions. Due to economic and political conditions, tax laws, regulations and rates in these ~~markets~~various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. Our future effective income tax rate could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or changes in tax laws or their interpretation. Recent developments, including potential U.S. tax reform discussions, the European Commission’s investigations of illegal state aid as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting may result in changes to long-standing tax principles, which could adversely affect our effective tax rate or result in higher cash tax liabilities. Increases in our effective tax rate or tax liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our ~~operating performance.~~

The high levels of sales in our defense segment between fiscal 2002 and 2013 were due in significant part to demand for defense tactical wheeled vehicles, replacement parts and services (including armoring) and vehicle remanufacturing arising from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Events such as these are unplanned, as is the demand for our products that arises out of such events. Virtually all U.S. troops were withdrawn from Iraq during 2011 and from Afghanistan during 2014. These troop redeployments resulted in significant reductions in the level of defense funding allocated to support U.S. military involvement in those conflicts. In addition, current economic and political conditions continue to put significant pressure on the U.S. federal budget, including the defense budget. Current and projected DoD budgets have significantly lower funding for our vehicles than we experienced during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. The DoD could also seek to reprogram certain funds originally planned for the purchase of vehicles manufactured by us under the current defense budget allocations. In addition, the Budget Control Act of 2011 contained an automatic sequestration feature that may require additional cuts to defense spending through fiscal 2023 if the budget caps within the agreement are exceeded. The two-year U.S. federal budget agreement signed by the President in December 2015 removed the threat of sequestration in the U.S. federal government’s fiscal 2016 and 2017 budget, but absent future budget agreements, the full effect of sequestration could return in the government’s fiscal 2018 budget. The magnitude of the adverse impact that federal budget pressures will have on funding for Oshkosh defense programs is unknown. Furthermore, our defense business may fluctuate significantly from time to time as a result of the start and completion of existing and new domestic and international contract awards that we may receive.

The access equipment market is highly cyclical and impacted (i) by the strength of economies in general, (ii) by residential and non-residential construction spending, (iii) by the ability of rental companies to obtain third-party financing to purchase revenue generating assets, (iv) by capital expenditures of rental companies in general, including the rate at which they replace aged rental equipment, which is impacted in part by historical purchase levels, including lower levels of purchasing during the Great Recession, which the Company believes is contributing to a slowdown in access equipment sales, (v) by the timing of engine emissions standards changes, and (vi) by other factors, including oil and gas related activity. The ready-mix concrete market that we serve is highly cyclical and impacted by the strength of the economy generally, by the number of housing starts and by other factors that may have an effect on the level of concrete placement activity, either regionally or nationally, including the impact of federal legislation, such as the $325 billion, six-year Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015, which is also known as the 2015 Federal Highway Bill. Refuse collection vehicle markets are also cyclical and impacted by the strength of economies in general, by municipal tax receipts and by the size and timing of capital expenditures by large waste haulers. Fire & emergency markets are cyclical later in an economic downturn and are impacted by the economy generally and by municipal tax receipts and capital expenditures.

The global economic recovery has progressed at a slow pace, which has negatively impacted sales volumes for our access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency products as compared to historical levels. Lower U.S. and European housing starts and non-residential construction spending compared to historical levels is limiting potential sales volume increases in the access equipment and commercial segments. In addition, lower U.S. housing starts versus historical levels since fiscal 2008 also adversely impacted municipal tax revenue, which negatively impacted demand for refuse collection vehicles and fire apparatus and delayed the recovery in these markets. While demand in our access equipment markets has rebounded from historical lows that we experienced during the Great Recession, such demand is dependent on global economies and may not be sustainable. During the second half of fiscal 2015 and the first half of fiscal 2016, we experienced a slowdown in access equipment and concrete mixer orders and purchases due to severe weather and rains during our second and third quarters of fiscal 2015 and the

impact of lower oil and gas prices on access equipment rental utilization. We believe this slowdown will continue for the remainder of fiscal 2016. A lack of sustained improvement in residential and non-residential construction spending generally may result in our inability to achieve our sales expectations or cause future weakness in demand for our products. We currently believe construction-driven demand will not be adequate to fully offset anticipated reduced access equipment replacement demand resulting from very low industry purchases in 2009 and 2010 leading to an expected 13% to 18% sales decline in our access equipment segment in fiscal 2016. Despite U.S. construction growth over the past year and an aged installed base, access equipment and concrete mixer customers have adopted a cautious approach to fleet replacement/expansion, generally wanting to confirm that the construction market in the U.S. gets off to a good start in 2016 before fully committing to their desired equipment purchasing plans. All of these factors, whether taken together or individually, could result in lower demand for our products. We cannot provide any assurance that the slow economic recovery will not progress even more slowly than what we or the market expect. If the global economic recovery progresses more slowly than what we or the market expect, then there could be a material adverse effect on our net sales, financial condition, profitability and/or cash flows.

~~Concrete mixer and access equipment sales also~~Our financial statements are seasonal with the majority of such sales occurring in the spring and summer months, which constitute the traditional construction season in the Northern hemisphere. The timing of orders for the traditional construction season in the Northern hemisphere can be impacted by weather conditions.

~~We may not be able to execute on our MOVE strategy.~~

We previously announced a roadmap, our MOVE strategy, to deliver long-term growth and earnings for our shareholders. We are continuing to pursue our MOVE strategy in fiscal 2016 and beyond. The long-term growth and earnings that we expect to achieve as a result of our MOVE strategy are based on certain assumptions we have made, which assumptions may prove to be incorrect. We cannot provide any assurance we will be able to successfully execute our MOVE strategy, which is subject to ~~a variety of risks, including the following:~~

~~A lower~~changes in accounting standards that could adversely impact our profitability or slower than expected recovery in housing starts and non-residential construction spending in the U.S., including a scenario where lower oil and gas industry activity as a result of lower oil and gas prices leads to a broader slowdown in residential and non-residential construction activity;

A slower or less significant recovery in any of our global markets than we expect, especially in the access equipment markets in Europe, Australia and Latin America and the concrete mixer and refuse collection vehicle markets in North America where the recovery has been slower than expected;

~~Greater than expected declines in DoD tactical wheeled vehicle spending;~~

Adverse impacts of a continued strong U.S. dollar compared to other currencies globally on the competitiveness of our U.S. exports to global markets and on the translation of foreign operating results into U.S. dollars;

~~Our inability to design new products that meet our customers’ requirements and bring them to market;~~

~~Our inability to adjust our cost structure in response to lower access equipment and concrete mixer sales;~~

~~Higher costs than anticipated to launch new products or delays in new product launches;~~

~~Greater than expected pressure on municipal budgets;~~

~~Our inability to raise prices to offset cost increases or increase margins;~~

~~The possibility that commodity cost escalations could erode profits;~~

~~Low cost competitors aggressively entering one or more of our markets with significantly lower pricing;~~

~~Primary competitors vying for share gains through aggressive price competition;~~

~~Our inability to obtain and retain adequate resources to support production ramp-ups, including management personnel;~~

~~The inability of our supply base to keep pace with the economic recovery;~~

~~Our failure to realize product, process and overhead cost reduction targets;~~

~~Slow adoption of our products in emerging markets and/or our inability to successfully execute our emerging market growth strategy; and~~

Uncertainty regarding timing of funding or payments on key large international defense tactical wheeled vehicle contracts, including contracts for M-ATVs. If we do not receive timely funding or payments under those contracts, then we could incur higher interest costs. Further, we have made commitments to purchase materials and components based on the expectation that we would receive timely funding or payments under those M-ATV contracts. If we do not receive timely funding or payments under those M-ATV contracts, disruptions may result to our manufacturing schedule, and correspondingly to our suppliers, that will cause us to record higher product costs and potentially charges for excess or obsolete inventory to the extent we build product and are unable to complete contracts or find alternate uses for the materials and components and cannot otherwise realize value for them.

financial position.

Our ~~dependency on contracts with U.S. and foreign government agencies subjects us to a variety of risks that could materially reduce our revenues or profits.~~

Wefinancial statements are ~~dependent on U.S. and foreign government contracts for a substantial portion of our business. Approximately 15% of our sales in fiscal 2015 were to the DoD. That business is~~ subject to the ~~following risks, among others,~~application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, we must adopt new or revised accounting standards that recognized authoritative bodies, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, have issued. Recently, accounting standard setters issued new guidance that further interprets or seeks to revise accounting pronouncements related to revenue recognition and lease accounting and issued new standards expanding disclosures. We discuss the impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented in our annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. We do not provide an assessment of proposed standards, as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, we cannot meaningfully assess their effects on our financial statements. It is possible that accounting standards we must adopt in the future could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our ~~operating performance:~~

~~Our business is susceptible to changes in the U.S. defense budget, which changes may reduce revenues that we expect from our defense business, especially in light~~reported results of federal budget pressures in part caused by U.S. economic weakness, the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, sequestration and the level of defense funding that will be allocated to the DoD's tactical wheeled vehicle strategy generally.

The U.S. government may not budget for or appropriate funding that we expect for our U.S. government contracts, which may prevent us from realizing revenues under current contracts or receiving additional orders that we anticipate we will receive. Current and projected DoD budgets include significantly lower funding for our vehicles than we experienced during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.

The funding of U.S. government programs is subject to an annual congressional budget authorization and appropriation process. In years when the U.S. government has not completed its budget process before the end of its fiscal year, government operations are typically funded pursuant to a “continuing resolution,” which allows federal government agencies to operate at spending levels approved in the previous budget cycle, but does not authorize new spending initiatives. When the U.S. government operates under a continuing resolution, delays can occur in the procurement of the products, services and solutions that we provide and may result in new initiatives being delayed or canceled, or funds could be reprogrammed away from our programs to pay for higher priority operational needs. In years when the U.S. government fails to complete its budget process or to provide for a continuing resolution, a federal government shutdown may result, similar to that which occurred in October 2013. This could in turn result in the delay or cancellation of key programs, which could have a negative effect on our cash flows and adversely affect our future results. In addition, payments to contractors for services performed during a federal government shutdown may be delayed, which would have a negative effect on our cash flows.

Competitions for the award of defense tactical wheeled vehicle contracts are intense, and we cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in the defense tactical wheeled vehicle procurement competitions in which we participate.

Certain of our government contracts for the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps could be delayed or terminated, and all such contracts expire in the future and may not be replaced, which could reduce revenues that we expect under the contracts and negatively affect margins in our defense segment.

The Competition in Contracting Act requires competition for U.S. defense programs in most circumstances. Competition for DoD programs that we currently have could result in the U.S. government awarding future contracts to another manufacturer or the U.S. government awarding the contracts to us at lower prices and operating margins than we experience under the current contracts. In particular, the DoD has begun a process to solicit interest from potential suppliers to manufacture the FMTV. We expect the U.S. government will issue requests for proposal from interested parties in fiscal 2016 for proposal submission sometime in fiscal 2017 and award a new FMTV production contract to the successful bidder sometime thereafter. In addition, the U.S. government has become more aggressive in seeking to acquire the intellectual property and design rights to our current and potential future programs to facilitate competition for manufacturing our vehicles. Sale of intellectual property and design rights to the DoD was an evaluation factor in the JLTV production contract competition and may be an evaluation factor in other future U.S. government contract competitions.

Defense tactical wheeled vehicles contract awards that we receive may be subject to protests or lawsuits by competing bidders, which protests or lawsuits, if successful, could result in the DoD revoking part or all of any defense tactical wheeled vehicles contract it awards to us and our inability to recover amounts we have expended in anticipation of initiating production under any such contract.

Most of our government contracts, including the JLTV contract, are fixed-price contracts with price escalation factors included for those contracts that extend beyond one year. Our actual costs on any of these contracts may exceed our projected costs, which could result in profits lower than historically realized or than we anticipate or net losses under these contracts. Under the JLTV contract, we bear the risk of material, labor and overhead cost escalation for the full eight years of the contract, which is three to five years longer than has been the case under our other defense contracts.

We must spend significant sums on product development and testing, bid and proposal activities and pre-contract engineering, tooling and design activities in competitions to have the opportunity to be awarded these contracts.

Our defense products undergo rigorous testing by the customer and are subject to highly technical requirements. Our products are inspected extensively by the DoD prior to acceptance to determine adherence to contractual technical and quality requirements. The recently awarded JLTV contract contains product testing requirements that are generally

more extreme than our other DoD contracts. Any failure to pass these tests or to comply with these requirements could result in unanticipated retrofit and rework costs, vehicle design changes, delayed acceptance of vehicles, late or no payments under such contracts or cancellation of the contract to provide vehicles to the U.S. government.

As a U.S. government contractor, our U.S. government contracts and systems are subject to audit and review by the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the Defense Contract Management Agency. These agencies review our performance under our U.S. government contracts, our cost structure and our compliance with laws and regulations applicable to U.S. government contractors. Systems that are subject to review include, but are not limited to, our accounting systems, estimating systems, material management systems, earned value management systems, purchasing systems and government property systems. If improper or illegal activities, errors or system inadequacies come to the attention of the U.S. government, as a result of an audit or otherwise, then we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties, contract adjustments and/or agreements to upgrade existing systems as well as administrative sanctions that may include the termination of our U.S. government contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and, under certain circumstances, suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracts for a period of time. Whether or not illegal activities are alleged and regardless of materiality, the U.S. government also has the ability to decrease or withhold certain payments when it deems systems subject to its review to be inadequate. These laws and regulations affect how we do business with our customers and, in many instances, impose added costs on our business.

Our defense tactical wheeled vehicle contracts are large in size and require significant personnel and production resources, and when our defense tactical wheeled vehicle customers allow such contracts to expire or significantly reduce their vehicle requirements under such contracts, we must make adjustments to personnel and production resources. The start and completion of existing and new contract awards that we may receive can cause our defense business to fluctuate significantly. During the past two years, we have completed significant reductions to our production and office workforce within our defense segment. If we are unable to effectively ramp up our workforce, as we are currently starting to do to support the JLTV program, our future earnings and cash flows would be adversely affected.

In the event of component availability constraints, the U.S. government has the ability to unilaterally divert the supply of components used on multiple government programs to those programs rated most urgent (DX-rated programs). This could result in the U.S. government diverting the supply of component parts necessary for the production of vehicles under our U.S. defense contracts to other contractors.

We periodically experience difficulties with sourcing sufficient vehicle carcasses from the U.S. military to maintain our defense tactical wheeled vehicles remanufacturing schedule, which can create uncertainty and inefficiencies for this area of our business.financial condition.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Common Stock Repurchases

On August 31, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors increased the Company's authorization to repurchase shares of the Company's Common Stock by 10,000,000 shares, taking the authorized number of shares of Common Stock available for repurchase to 10,299,198 as of that date. As of March 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had repurchased 2,786,624 shares of Common Stock under this authorization. As a result, 7,512,574 shares of Common Stock remained available for repurchase under the repurchase authorization at March 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The Company can use this authorization at any time as there is no expiration date associated with the authorization. From time to time, the Company may enter into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan for the purpose of repurchasing shares under this authorization. The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Company's Common Stock under this authorization during the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017.

The Company intends to declare and pay dividends on a regular basis. However, the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings and cash flows, capital requirements, the Company’s general financial condition, general business conditions and other factors. In addition, the Company's credit agreement limits the amount of dividends and other distributions, including repurchases of shares of Common Stock, the Company may pay on or after March 3, 2010 to (i) 50% of the consolidated net income of the Company and its subsidiaries (or if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), accrued on a cumulative basis during the period beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of the applicable proposed dividend or distribution; plus (ii) 100% of the aggregate net proceeds received by the Company subsequent to March 3, 2010 either as a contribution to its common equity capital or from the issuance and sale of its Common Stock. The Company's indentures for its senior notes due 2022 and senior notes due 2025 also contain restrictive covenants that may limit the Company's ability to repurchase shares of its Common Stock or make dividends and other types of distributions to shareholders.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No. Description


10.1	~~Severance Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2016 between~~ Oshkosh Corporation 2017 Incentive Stock and Wilson R. Jones.*


~~10.2~~	~~Key Executive Employment and Severance Agreement between~~Awards Plan (incorporated by reference to Attachment B to Oshkosh Corporation's definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A for the Oshkosh Corporation ~~and Wilson R. Jones.~~Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on February 7, 2017 (File No. 1-31371)).*


31.1	Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


31.2	Certification by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


32.1	Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


32.2	Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.

* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



		OSHKOSH CORPORATION

April ~~28, 2016~~26, 2017	By	/s/ Wilson R. Jones
		Wilson R. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer

April ~~28, 2016~~26, 2017	By	/s/ David M. Sagehorn
		David M. Sagehorn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

April ~~28, 2016~~26, 2017	By	/s/ ~~Thomas J. Polnaszek~~James C. Freeders
		~~Thomas J. Polnaszek,~~James C. Freeders, Senior Vice President Finance and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. Description


10.1	~~Severance Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2016 between~~ Oshkosh Corporation 2017 Incentive Stock and Wilson R. Jones.*


~~10.2~~	~~Key Executive Employment and Severance Agreement between~~Awards Plan (incorporated by reference to Attachment B to Oshkosh Corporation's definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A for the Oshkosh Corporation ~~and Wilson R. Jones.~~Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on February 7, 2017 (File No. 1-31371)).*


31.1	Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


31.2	Certification by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


32.1	Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.


32.2	Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April ~~28, 2016.~~26, 2017.

101

The following materials from Oshkosh Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 are filed herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.