UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020
OR
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____to_____
Commission File Number
Registrant; State of Incorporation;
Address; and Telephone Number
IRS Employer Identification No.
1-9513CMS ENERGY CORPORATION38-2726431
(A Michigan Corporation)
One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201
(517) 788‑0550
1-5611CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY38-0442310
(A Michigan Corporation)
One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201
(517) 788‑0550
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
CMS Energy Corporation Common Stock, $0.01 par value CMS New York Stock Exchange
CMS Energy Corporation 5.625% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2078 CMSA New York Stock Exchange
CMS Energy Corporation 5.875% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2078 CMSC New York Stock Exchange
CMS Energy Corporation 5.875% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2079 CMSD New York Stock Exchange
Consumers Energy Company Cumulative Preferred Stock, $100 par value: $4.50 Series CMS-PB New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
CMS Energy Corporation:YesNo Consumers Energy Company:YesNo 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
CMS Energy Corporation:YesNo Consumers Energy Company:YesNo 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.
CMS Energy Corporation:     Consumers Energy Company:     
Large accelerated filer    Large accelerated filer    
Non‑accelerated filer    Non‑accelerated filer    
Accelerated filer    Accelerated filer    
Smaller reporting company    Smaller reporting company    
Emerging growth company    Emerging growth company    
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
CMS Energy Corporation:    Consumers Energy Company:    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act).
CMS Energy Corporation:YesNo Consumers Energy Company:YesNo 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock at July 9, 2019:April 6, 2020:
CMS Energy Corporation: 
CMS Energy Common Stock, $0.01 par value (including 20,31612,322 shares owned by Consumers Energy)283,787,006286,221,472
Consumers Energy Company: 
Consumers Common Stock, $10 par value, privately held by CMS Energy Corporation84,108,789










CMS Energy Corporation
Consumers Energy Company
Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the Period Ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020
Table of Contents


1



Glossary
Certain terms used in the text and financial statements are defined below.
2016 Energy Law
Michigan’s Public Acts 341 and 342 of 2016, which became effective in April 2017
20182019 Form 10‑K
Each of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 20182019
ABATE
The Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity
ARO
Asset retirement obligation
ASU
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update
Bay Harbor
A residential/commercial real estate area located near Petoskey, Michigan, in which CMS Energy sold its interest in 2002
bcf
Billion cubic feet
CARES Act
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020
Cantera Gas Company
Cantera Gas Company LLC, a non‑affiliated company, formerly known as CMS Field Services
Cantera Natural Gas, Inc.
Cantera Natural Gas, Inc., a non‑affiliated company that purchased CMS Field Services
CCR
Coal combustion residual
CDC
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
CERCLA
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended
CFO
Chief Financial Officer
Clean Air Act
Federal Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended


2



Clean Energy Plan
Consumers’ long‑term strategy for delivering clean, reliable, and affordable energy to its customers through the increased use of energy efficiency and customer demand management programs, additional renewable energy generation, and conservation voltage reduction
Clean Water Act
Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended
CMS Capital
CMS Capital, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy


2


CMS Energy
CMS Energy Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise noted; the parent of Consumers, and CMS Enterprises, and EnerBank
CMS Enterprises
CMS Enterprises Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy
CMS ERM
CMS Energy Resource Management Company, formerly known as CMS MST, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises
CMS Field Services
CMS Field Services, Inc., a former wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Gas Transmission Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises
CMS Land
CMS Land Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Capital, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy
CMS MST
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises, whose name was changed to CMS ERMEnergy Resource Management Company in 2004
Consumers
Consumers Energy Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise noted; a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy
COVID‑19
Coronavirus disease 2019, a respiratory illness that was declared a pandemic in March 2020 and to which public and private agencies have responded by instituting social-distancing and other measures designed to slow the spread of the disease
CSAPR
The Cross‑State Air Pollution Rule of 2011, as amended
DB Pension Plans
Defined benefit pension plans of CMS Energy and Consumers, including certain present and former affiliates and subsidiaries
DB SERP
Defined Benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
DIG
Dearborn Industrial Generation, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Dearborn Industrial Energy, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy
Dodd‑Frank Act
Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010


3



EBITDA
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
EGLE
The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, formerly known as the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
EnerBank
EnerBank USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Capital,


3


CMS Energy
energy waste reduction
The reduction of energy consumption through energy efficiency and demand‑side energy conservation, as established under the 2016 Energy Law
EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPS
Earnings per share
Exchange Act
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FERC
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FICO
Fair Issac Corporation, a non-affiliated company providing data analytic services, with a focus on credit scoring services
FTR
Financial transmission right
GAAP
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GCR
Gas cost recovery
Genesee
Genesee Power Station Limited Partnership, a variable interest entity in which HYDRA‑CO Enterprises, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises, has a 50‑percent interest
Internal Revenue Code
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
IRP
Integrated resource plan
ITCIRS
International Transmission Company, wholly owned by ITC Holdings Corp., a non‑affiliated companyInternal Revenue Service
kWh
Kilowatt‑hour, a unit of energy equal to one thousand watt‑hours
LIBOR
The London Interbank Offered Rate
Ludington
Ludington pumped‑storage plant, jointly owned by Consumers and DTE Electric Company, a non‑affiliated company


4



LIBOR
The London Interbank Offered Rate
MATS
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, which limit mercury, acid gases, and other toxic pollution from coal‑fueled and oil‑fueled power plants
MCV Partnership
Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership
MCV PPA
PPA between Consumers and the MCV Partnership
MD&A
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
METC
Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC, a non‑affiliated company
MGP
Manufactured gas plant
Michigan Mercury Rule
Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules of 2009, as amended, Part 15: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions – Prohibitions—Mercury
MISO
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MISS DIG Act
MISS DIG Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act of 2013
mothball
To place a generating unit into a state of extended reserve shutdown in which the unit is inactive and unavailable for service for a specified period, during which the unit can be brought back into service after receiving appropriate notification and completing any necessary maintenance or other work; generation owners in MISO must request approval to mothball a unit, and MISO then evaluates the request for reliability impacts
MPSC
Michigan Public Service Commission
MW
Megawatt, a unit of power equal to one million watts
NAAQS
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NPDES
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a permit system for regulating point sources of pollution under the Clean Water Act
NREPA
Part 201 of Michigan’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994, as amended


5



NSR
New Source Review, a construction‑permitting program under the Clean Air Act
OPEB
Other Post‑Employment Benefits
OPEB Plan
Postretirement health care and life insurance plans of CMS Energy and Consumers, including certain present and former affiliates and subsidiaries
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyl
PHMSA
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
PPA
Power purchase agreement
PSCR
Power supply cost recovery
PURPA
The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
RCRA
The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
REC
Renewable energy credit
ROA
Retail Open Access, which allows electric generation customers to choose alternative electric suppliers pursuant to Michigan’s Public Acts 141 and 142 of 2000, as amended
SEC
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
securitization
A financing method authorized by statute and approved by the MPSC which allows a utility to sell its right to receive a portion of the rate payments received from its customers for the repayment of securitization bonds issued by a special‑purpose entity affiliated with such utility
Smart Energy
Consumers’ Smart Energy grid modernization project, which includes the installation of smart meters that transmit and receive data, a two‑way communications network, and modifications to Consumers’ existing information technology system to manage the data and enable changes to key business processes
TCJA
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017


6



UWUA
Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO


7



Filing Format
This combined Form 10‑Q is separately filed by CMS Energy and Consumers. Information in this combined Form 10‑Q relating to each individual registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Consumers makes no representation regarding information relating to any other companies affiliated with CMS Energy other than its own subsidiaries. None of CMS Energy, CMS Enterprises, EnerBank, nor any of CMS Energy’s other subsidiaries (other than Consumers) has any obligation in respect of Consumers’ debt securities and holders of such debt securities should not consider the financial resources or results of operations of CMS Energy, CMS Enterprises, EnerBank, nor any of CMS Energy’s other subsidiaries (other than Consumers and its own subsidiaries (in relevant circumstances)) in making a decision with respect to Consumers’ debt securities. Similarly, neither Consumers nor any other subsidiary of CMS Energy has any obligation in respect of debt securities of CMS Energy.
This report should be read in its entirety. No one section of this report deals with all aspects of the subject matter of this report. This report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and with MD&A included in the 20182019 Form 10‑K.
Available Information
CMS Energy’s internet address is www.cmsenergy.com. CMS Energy routinely posts important information on its website and considers the Investor Relations section, www.cmsenergy.com/investor‑relations, a channel of distribution. Information contained on CMS Energy’s website is not incorporated herein.
Forward‑Looking Statements and Information
This Form 10‑Q and other CMS Energy and Consumers disclosures may contain forward‑looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of “might,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “predicts,” “assumes,” and other similar words is intended to identify forward‑looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. This discussion of potential risks and uncertainties is designed to highlight important factors that may impact CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses and financial outlook. CMS Energy and Consumers have no obligation to update or revise forward‑looking statements regardless of whether new information, future events, or any other factors affect the information contained in the statements. These forward‑looking statements are subject to various factors that could cause CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated in these statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following, all of which are potentially significant:
the impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ revenues, expenses, uncollectible accounts, energy efficiency programs, pension funding, PSCR and GCR costs, capital investment programs, cash flows, liquidity, maintenance of existing assets, and other operating expenses
the impact of new regulation by the MPSC, FERC, and other applicable governmental proceedings and regulations, including any associated impact on electric or gas rates or rate structures
potentially adverse regulatory treatment effects of aor failure to receive timely regulatory orders affecting Consumers that are or could come before the MPSC, FERC, or other governmental authorities effects


8



changes in the performance of or regulations applicable to MISO, METC, pipelines, railroads, vessels, or other service providers that CMS Energy, Consumers, or any of their affiliates rely on to serve their customers


7


the adoption of federal or state laws or regulations or challenges to federal or state laws or regulations, or changes in applicable laws, rules, regulations, principles, or practices, or in their interpretation, such as those related to energy policy, ROA, and PURPA, infrastructure integrity or security, gas pipeline safety, gas pipeline capacity, energy waste reduction, the environment, regulation or deregulation, reliability, health care reforms (including comprehensive health care reform enacted in 2010), taxes, accounting matters, climate change, air emissions, renewable energy, potential effects of the Dodd‑Frank Act, and other business issues that could have an impact on CMS Energy’s, Consumers’, or any of their affiliates’ businesses or financial results
factors affecting operations, such as costs and availability of personnel, equipment, and materials; weather conditions; natural disasters; catastrophic weather‑related damage; scheduled or unscheduled equipment outages; maintenance or repairs; environmental incidents; failures of equipment or materials; electric transmission and distribution or gas pipeline system constraints; interconnection requirements; and changes in trade policies or regulations
increases in demand for renewable energy by customers seeking to meet sustainability goals
the ability of Consumers to execute its cost‑reduction strategies
potentially adverse regulatory or legal interpretations or decisions regarding environmental matters, or delayed regulatory treatment or permitting decisions that are or could come before EGLE, the EPA, and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and potential environmental remediation costs associated with these interpretations or decisions, including those that may affect Bay Harbor or Consumers’ routine maintenance, repair, and replacement classification under NSR regulations
changes in energy markets, including availability and price of electric capacity and the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and availability and deliverability of coal, natural gas, natural gas liquids, electricity, oil, and certain related products
the price of CMS Energy common stock, the credit ratings of CMS Energy and Consumers, capital and financial market conditions, and the effect of these market conditions on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ interest costs and access to the capital markets, including availability of financing to CMS Energy, Consumers, or any of their affiliates
the potential effects of a future transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference interest rate in the capital markets
the investment performance of the assets of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ pension and benefit plans, the discount rates, mortality assumptions, and future medical costs used in calculating the plans’ obligations, and the resulting impact on future funding requirements
the impact of the economy, particularly in Michigan, and potential future volatility in the financial and credit markets on CMS Energy’s, Consumers’, or any of their affiliates’ revenues, ability to collect accounts receivable from customers, or cost and availability of capital
changes in the economic and financial viability of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ suppliers, customers, and other counterparties and the continued ability of these third parties, including those in bankruptcy, to meet their obligations to CMS Energy and Consumers


9



population changes in the geographic areas where CMS Energy and Consumers conduct business


8


national, regional, and local economic, competitive, and regulatory policies, conditions, and developments
loss of customer demand for electric generation supply to alternative electric suppliers, increased use of distributed generation, or energy waste reduction and storage
adverse consequences of employee, director, or third‑party fraud or non‑compliance with codes of conduct or with laws or regulations
federal regulation of electric sales and transmission of electricity, including periodic re‑examination by federal regulators of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ market‑based sales authorizations
the impact of credit markets, economic conditions, increased competition, and any new banking and consumer protection regulations on EnerBank
the availability, cost, coverage, and terms of insurance, the stability of insurance providers, and the ability of Consumers to recover the costs of any insurance from customers
the effectiveness of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ risk management policies, procedures, and strategies, including strategies to hedge risk related to interest rates and future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy‑related commodities
factors affecting development of electric generation projects and gas and electric transmission and distribution infrastructure replacement, conversion, and expansion projects, including factors related to project site identification, construction material pricing, schedule delays, availability of qualified construction personnel, permitting, acquisition of property rights, and government approvals
potential disruption to, interruption of, or other impacts on facilities, utility infrastructure, operations, or backup systems due to accidents, explosions, physical disasters, global pandemics, cyber incidents, vandalism, war, or terrorism, and the ability to obtain or maintain insurance coverage for these events
changes or disruption in fuel supply, including but not limited to supplier bankruptcy and delivery disruptions
potential costs, lost revenues, reputational harm, or other consequences resulting from misappropriation of assets or sensitive information, corruption of data, or operational disruption in connection with a cyber attack or other cyber incident
potential disruption to, interruption or failure of, or other impacts on information technology backup or disaster recovery systems
technological developments in energy production, storage, delivery, usage, and metering
the ability to implement technology successfully
the impact of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ integrated business software system and its effects on their operations, including utility customer billing and collections


10



adverse consequences resulting from any past, present, or future assertion of indemnity or warranty claims associated with assets and businesses previously owned by CMS Energy or


9


Consumers, including claims resulting from attempts by foreign or domestic governments to assess taxes on or to impose environmental liability associated with past operations or transactions
the outcome, cost, and other effects of any legal or administrative claims, proceedings, investigations, or settlements
the reputational impact on CMS Energy and Consumers of operational incidents, violations of corporate policies, regulatory violations, inappropriate use of social media, and other events
restrictions imposed by various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements on the ability of Consumers and other subsidiaries of CMS Energy to transfer funds to CMS Energy in the form of cash dividends, loans, or advances
earnings volatility resulting from the application of fair value accounting to certain energy commodity contracts or interest rate contracts
changes in financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies
other matters that may be disclosed from time to time in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ SEC filings, or in other public documents
All forward‑looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk and other factors described above and as detailed from time to time in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ SEC filings. For additional details regarding these and other uncertainties, see Part I—Item 1. Financial Statements—MD&A—Outlook and Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2, Regulatory Matters and Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments; and Part II—Item 1A. Risk Factors.


1011




(This page intentionally left blank)


12



Part I—Financial Information
Item 1.    Financial Statements
Index to Financial Statements


1113



CMS Energy Corporation
Consumers Energy Company
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This MD&A is a combined report of CMS Energy and Consumers.
Executive Overview
CMS Energy is an energy company operating primarily in Michigan. It is the parent holding company of several subsidiaries, including Consumers, an electric and gas utility, andutility; CMS Enterprises, primarily a domestic independent power producer and marketer.marketer; and EnerBank, an industrial bank located in Utah. Consumers’ electric utility operations include the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity, and Consumers’ gas utility operations include the purchase, transmission, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas. Consumers’ customer base consists of a mix of residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers. CMS Enterprises, through its subsidiaries and equity investments, is engaged in domestic independent power production, including the development and operation of renewable generation, and the marketing of independent power production. EnerBank provides primarily unsecured, fixed-rate installment loans throughout the U.S. to finance home improvements.
CMS Energy and Consumers manage their businesses by the nature of services each provides. CMS Energy operates principally in threefour business segments: electric utility; gas utility; and enterprises, its non‑utility operations and investments.investments; and EnerBank. Consumers operates principally in two business segments: electric utility and gas utility. CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses are affected primarily by:
regulation and regulatory matters
state and federal legislation
economic conditions
weather
energy commodity prices
interest rates
their securities’ credit ratings
COVID‑19 Pandemic
CMS Energy and Consumers are responding to a public health emergency caused by the COVID‑19 pandemic by instituting measures consistent with guidance provided by local, state, and federal agencies. CMS Energy and Consumers maintain over 60 departmental business continuity plans; these plans were reviewed and enhanced in early 2020 to ensure readiness for the COVID-19 pandemic. CMS Energy and Consumers have taken steps to protect the safety of employees, customers, and contractors, and have executed their business continuity plans to ensure the continued delivery of critical energy services. Additionally, CMS Energy and Consumers have mitigated the potential impact of the pandemic on their liquidity by recently completing financing transactions and reducing the need for external funding for the remainder of the year.
The COVID‑19 pandemic is a rapidly evolving situation. In the near term, Consumers has experienced a decline in electric deliveries to commercial and industrial customers and anticipates increased


14



uncollectible accounts, workforce-related costs, miscellaneous expenses above amounts in general rates, and other one-time costs in the future as a result of the pandemic. In April 2020, the MPSC issued an order authorizing Consumers to defer uncollectible accounts expense associated with the pandemic and requesting comments on utility accounting for other COVID‑19-related expenses and COVID‑19-related impacts to regulatory activities.
Additionally, EnerBank has experienced slower lending growth and anticipates higher loan write-offs and increased loan modifications in the future as a result of the pandemic. The companies cannot predict the long-term impact of the pandemic on their liquidity, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or capital investment program. More detailed discussion of the near-term impacts of and future uncertainties related to the COVID‑19 pandemic can be found throughout this MD&A and in Part II—Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The Triple Bottom Line
CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ purpose is to achieve world class performance while delivering hometown service. In support of this purpose, the companies employ the “Consumers Energy Way,” a lean operating model designed to improve safety, quality, cost, delivery, and employee morale.


12


CMS Energy and Consumers measure their progress toward the purpose by considering their impact on the “triple bottom line” of people, planet, and profit, which is underpinned by performance; this consideration takes into account not only the economic value that the companies create for customers and investors, but also their responsibility to social and environmental goals. The triple bottom line balances the interests of the companies’ employees, customers, suppliers, regulators, creditors, Michigan’s residents, the investment community, and other stakeholders, and it reflects the broader societal impacts of the companies’ activities.
graphic-cmsppp.jpg
Consumers’ Sustainability Report, which is available to the public, describes the company’s progress toward world class performance measured in the areas of people, planet, and profit.
People: The people element of the triple bottom line represents CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ commitment to their employees, their customers, the residents of local communities in which the companies do business, and other stakeholders.
The safety of employees, customers, and the general public is a priority of CMS Energy and Consumers. Accordingly, CMS Energy and Consumers have worked to integrate a set of safety principles into their business operations and culture. These principles include complying with applicable safety, health, and security regulations and implementing programs and processes aimed at continually improving safety and security conditions. Over the last ten years, Consumers’ OSHA recordable incident rate has decreased by over 7063 percent.
In response to the COVID‑19 pandemic, CMS Energy and Consumers have issued a response plan that is focused on the health and safety of their co-workers, customers, and communities. CMS Energy and Consumers have aligned with CDC guidelines and executive orders issued by Michigan’s governor to


15



protect their employees, customers, and contractors to ensure the continued delivery of critical energy services. To align with, and in addition to, these guidelines, CMS Energy and Consumers have:
sequestered employees with critical roles at generating plants, gas compression facilities, and electric control rooms
adjusted work to focus on emergent and critical activities such as electric outages, gas leaks, and other public safety and reliability work
implemented a 14‑day self-quarantine requirement for employees who have come into contact with a person suspected to have COVID‑19
prohibited business-related international and domestic travel, and instituted a mandatory 14‑day work remote period for employees who return from personal travel to impacted areas
required employees to work remotely when possible
reduced service at 13 direct payment offices to drop box and drive-through services only
contracted a chief medical officer to guide the companies’ response and provide rapid support and supplies for the workforce
offered additional paid leave to employees to alleviate child care-related burdens and implemented other interim workforce policies to offer flexibility and reduce employee concerns
CMS Energy and Consumers have also suspended shut-offs of service for non-payment and extended payment protection plans for low-income and senior customers through June 1, 2020.
CMS Energy and Consumers also place a high priority on customer value and on providing a hometown customer experience. Consumers’ customer-driven investment program is aimed at improving safety and increasing electric and gas reliability, which has resulted in measurable improvements in customer satisfaction.
Central to Consumers’ commitment to its customers are the initiatives it has undertaken to keep electricity and natural gas affordable, including:
replacement of coal-fueled generation and PPAs with cleaner and more efficient natural gas‑fueled generation, renewable energy and energy waste reduction and demand response programs
targeted infrastructure investment including the installation of smart metersto improve reliability and safety and to reduce maintenance costs
information and control system efficiencies
employee and retiree health care cost sharing
workforce productivity enhancements
In addition, Consumers’ gas commodity costs declined by 6062 percent from 20082009 through 2018,2019, due not only to a decrease in market prices but also to Consumers’ improvements to its gas infrastructure and optimization of its gas purchasing and storage strategy. These gas commodity savings are passed on to customers.
Planet: The planet element of the triple bottom line represents CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ commitment to protect the environment; thisenvironment. This commitment extends beyond complyingcompliance with the various state and federal environmental, and health, and safety laws and regulations to which CMS Energy and


13


Consumers are subject.regulations. Management considers climate change risk and other environmental risks in the companies’ strategy development, business planning, and enterprise risk management processes.


16



CMS Energy and Consumers continue to focus on opportunities to protect the environment and to reduce their carbon footprint. As a result of actions already taken by CMS Energy and Consumers, including the retirement of seven of Consumers’ coal-fueled electric generating units in 2016, the companies have:
decreased their combined percentage of electric supply (self-generated and purchased) from coal by 18 percentage points since 2015
reduced carbon dioxide emissions by over 35 percent since 2005
reduced the amount of water used to generate electricity by over 3035 percent since 2012
reduced landfill waste disposal by over one1.3 million cubic yardstons since 1992
reduced methane emissions by 1512 percent since 20112012
Additionally, over the last 20 years, Consumers has reduced its sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, particulate matter, and mercury emissions by over 90 percent.
The 2016 Energy Law:
raised the renewable energy standard from the present ten‑percent requirement to 12.5 percent in 2019 and 15 percent in 20212021; Consumers met the 12.5-percent requirement in 2019 with a combination of newly generated RECs and previously generated RECs carried over from prior years
established a goal of 35 percent combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction by 20252025; Consumers has achieved 22 percent of the combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction goal through 2019
authorized incentives for demand response programs and expanded existing incentives for energy efficiency programs, referring to the combined initiatives as energy waste reduction programs
established an integrated planning process for new generation resources
Consumers filed an IRP with the MPSC in June 2018, detailing its long‑term strategy for delivering reliable and affordable energy to its customers through the increased use of energy efficiency and customer demand management programs and additional renewable energy. In March 2019, Consumers and a broad coalition of key stakeholders, including business customers, environmental groups, the MPSC Staff, and the Michigan Attorney General, filed a settlement agreement with the MPSC and the MPSC approved itthe IRP that Consumers filed in June 2019.
2018, which details its Clean Energy Plan. Under its IRP,Clean Energy Plan, Consumers will meet the requirements of the 2016 Energy Law using its clean and lean strategy, which focuses on increasing the generation of renewable energy, helping customers use less energy, and offering demand response programs to reduce demand during critical peak times. Further, Consumers plans to replace all of its coal-fueled generation predominantly with investment in renewable energy, which will enable Consumers to meet and exceed the 2016 Energy Law renewable energy requirements and fulfill increasing customer demand for renewable energy. Through its IRP,Clean Energy Plan, Consumers expects to reduce carbon emissions of its owned generation by more than 90 percent from its 2005 levels by 2040. Additionally, the IRPClean Energy Plan will allow Consumers to achieve a breakthrough goal of at least 50 percent combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction by 2030.


1417



Presented in the following illustration is Consumers’ 2019 generationcapacity portfolio and its future capacity portfolio as projected in the IRP. This illustration includes the effects of purchased capacity and projected futureenergy waste reduction and uses the nameplate capacity of renewable energy sources:
chart-capacitymix.jpg
The Clean Energy Plan lays the foundation for Consumers’ recently announced goal to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2040. As part of this goal, which was announced in February 2020, Consumers will significantly reduce its carbon emissions from its electric business and offset any remaining emissions through strategies including, but not limited to, carbon sequestration, landfill methane capture, and large-scale tree planting. The goal includes not only emissions from Consumers’ owned generation, capacitybut also emissions from the generation of power purchased through long-term PPAs and from the MISO energy market.
In addition to Consumers’ efforts to reduce the electric utility’s carbon footprint, it is also making efforts to reduce the gas utility’s methane footprint. In October 2019, Consumers set a goal of net‑zero methane emissions from its natural gas delivery system by 2030. Consumers’ Methane Reduction Plan, released in 2030November 2019, outlines its plan to reach this net-zero emissions goal. Consumers plans to reduce methane emissions from its system by about 80 percent by accelerating the replacement of aging pipe, rehabilitating or retiring outdated infrastructure, and 2040, including purchased capacity, based on a varietyadopting new technologies and practices. The remaining emissions will be eliminated by purchasing and/or producing renewable natural gas.


18

chart-3e6daa7857c47f55b0e.jpg

Additionally, in an effort to advance its environmental stewardship in Michigan and to minimize the impact of future regulations, Consumers announced the following five‑year targets during 2018:
to reduce its water use by one billion gallons; induring 2018 and 2019, Consumers reduced its water usage by 180over 400 million gallons
to reduce the amount of waste taken to landfills by 35 percent; induring 2018 and 2019, Consumers reduced its waste to landfills by 1210 percent
to enhance, restore, or protect 5,000 acres of land; induring 2018 and 2019, Consumers enhanced, restored, or protected nearly 800over 2,200 acres of land
CMS Energy, through its non‑utility businesses,CMS Enterprises, continues to pursue further opportunities for the development of renewable generation projects. In recent years, CMS Enterprises has completed the development of and now operates a 105‑MW wind generation project in northwest Ohio and three solar generation projects in Michigan and Wisconsin totaling 27 MW. Renewable energy produced by these projects is committed to customers under long-term PPAs.projects.
CMS Energy and Consumers are monitoring numerous legislative, policy, and regulatory initiatives, including those to regulate greenhouse gases, and related litigation. While CMS Energy and Consumers


15


cannot predict the outcome of these matters, which could have a material effect on the companies, they intend to continue to move forward with their clean and lean strategy.
Profit: The profit element of the triple bottom line represents CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ commitment to meeting their financial objectives and providing economic development opportunities and benefits in the communities in which they do business. CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financial strength allows them to maintain solid investment-grade credit ratings and thereby reduce funding costs for the benefit of customers and investors, to preserve and create jobs, and to reinvest in the communities they serve.
For the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, CMS Energy’s net income available to common stockholders was $306$243 million, and diluted EPS were $1.08.$0.85. This compares with net income available to common stockholders of $380$213 million and diluted EPS of $1.35$0.75 for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. In 2019,2020, the benefits from electric and gas rate increases, and higher gas sales due primarily to colder weather were more than offset by higherlower service restoration costs, from 2019 winter storms,and increased income tax benefits were offset partially by lower electric and gas sales due primarily to unfavorable weather and higher depreciation and lower earnings at the enterprises segment.property tax expense. A more detailed discussion of the factors affecting CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ performance can be found in the Results of Operations section that follows this Executive Overview.
Consumers projects that itsanticipates a decline in electric weather-normalized deliveries will remain stableto commercial and industrial customers in the near term as a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic, but cannot predict the impact on full-year 2020 electric and gas deliveries at this time. Over the long term, Consumers expects weather-normalized electric deliveries will increaseover the next five years to decrease slightly through 2023.and weather‑normalized gas deliveries to remain stable. This outlook reflects modest growth in electric demand offset by the effects of energy waste reduction programs andoffset largely by modest growth in electric and gas demand offset partially by energy efficiency and conservation.demand.
Performance: Impacting the Triple Bottom Line
CMS Energy and Consumers remain committed to achieving world class performance while delivering hometown service. Leveraging the Consumers Energy Way, CMS Energy and Consumers have accomplished the following during 2019:
received approval of Consumers’ IRP, which supports the companies’ clean energy goals
launched a three-year electric vehicle pilot program
committed to invest $7.5 billion in Michigan businesses over the next five years; of that amount,$1.5 billion will be invested in diverse suppliers


19



completed the deployment of automated gas meters in areas where Consumers provides only natural gas to customers, allowing for drive-by meter reading
ranked the highest in customer satisfaction among large natural gas providers in the Midwest, according to a residential customer satisfaction study conducted by J.D. Power, a global marketing information company
CMS Energy and Consumers will continue to utilize the Consumers Energy Way to enable them to achieve world class performance and positively impact the triple bottom line. Consumers’ investment plan and the regulatory environment in which it operates also drive its ability to impact the triple bottom line.
Investment Plan: Consumers expects to make capital investments of $25 billion over the next ten years. Over the next five years, Consumers expects to make significant expenditures on infrastructure upgrades and replacements and electric supply projects from 2019 through 2023.projects. While it has a large number of potential investment opportunities that would add customer value, Consumers has prioritized its spending based on the criteria of enhancing public safety, increasing reliability, maintaining affordability for its customers, and advancing its environmental stewardship. Consumers’ investment program is expected to result in annual rate-base growth of six to eight percent. This rate-base growth, together with cost-control measures, should allow Consumers to maintain affordable customer prices.


16


Presented in the following illustration are planned capital expenditures of $11.2$12.2 billion that Consumers expects to make from 20192020 through 2023:2024:
chart-ede113ca14875e75999.jpgchart-plannedcapex.jpg
Of this amount, Consumers plans to spend $9.3$9.4 billion over the next five years to maintain and upgrade its gas infrastructure and electric distribution systems in order to enhance safety and reliability, improve customer satisfaction, and reduce energy waste on those systems. The gas infrastructure projects comprise $5.1$5.0 billion to sustain deliverability and enhance pipeline integrity and safety. These projects, which involve replacement of mains and services and enhancement of transmission and storage systems, should reduce the minor quantity of methane emissions released as gas is transported. The electric distribution projects comprise $4.2$4.4 billion to strengthen circuits and substations and replace poles. Consumers also expects to spend $1.9$2.8 billion on electric supply projects, representingprimarily new generation, including renewable generation, and environmental investments needed generation. In response


20



to comply with state and federal laws and regulations.the COVID‑19 pandemic, Consumers has rescheduled some capital investment projects, but has not made any changes to its long-term capital investment program at this time.
Regulation: Regulatory matters are a key aspect of Consumers’ business, particularly rate cases and regulatory proceedings before the MPSC, which permit recovery of new investments while helping to ensure that customer rates are fair and affordable. Important regulatory events and developments not already discussed are summarized below.
2018 Electric2019 Gas Rate Case: In May 2018,December 2019, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual rate increase of $58$245 million, based on a 10.7510.5 percent authorized return on equity. The filing requested authority to recover new investment in system reliability, environmental compliance, and technology enhancements. In October 2018, Consumers reduced its requested annual rate increase to $44 million. In January 2019,also seeks approval of a revenue decoupling mechanism that would annually reconcile Consumers’ actual weather-normalized non-fuel revenues with the MPSCrevenues approved a settlement agreement authorizing an annual rate decrease of $24 million, based on a 10.0 percent authorized return on equity. Withby the elimination of the $113 million TCJA credit to customer bills, the approved settlement agreement resulted in an $89 million net increase in annual rates. The settlement agreement also provided for deferred accounting treatment for distribution‑related capital investments exceeding certain amounts. Consumers also agreed to not file a new electric rate case prior to January 2020.MPSC.


17


2018 Gas2020 Electric Rate Case: In November 2018,February 2020, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual rate increase of $229$244 million, based on a 10.7510.5 percent authorized return on equity.The filing also requestsseeks approval to recover $13 million associated with Consumers’ deferral of depreciation and property tax expense and the overall rate of return on distribution-related capital investments exceeding certain threshold amounts. Additionally, the filing seeks approval of a revenue decouplingmethod of recovering amounts earned under the financial compensation mechanism that would annually reconcile Consumers’ actual weather‑normalized, non‑fuel revenues with the revenues approved by the MPSC. In April 2019,MPSC in Consumers’ IRP. This mechanism allows Consumers reduced its requested annual rate increase to $204 million.earn a financial incentive on PPAs approved by the MPSC after January 1, 2019. Consumers also proposes in the filing a new distributed generation tariff to replace the current net metering tariff, pursuant to the 2016 Energy Law.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: The TCJA, which changed existing federal tax law and included numerous provisions that affect businesses, was signed into law in December 2017. In early 2018, the MPSC ordered Consumers to file various proceedings to determine the reduction in its electric and gas revenue requirements as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, and to implement bill credits to reflect that reduction until customer rates could be adjusted through Consumers’ general rate cases. Consumers filed, and the MPSC approved, such proceedings throughout 2018, resulting in credits to customer bills during 2018 to reflect reductions in Consumers’ electric and gas revenue requirements. Additionally, Consumers filed an application to address the December 31, 2017 remeasurement of its deferred income taxes and other base rate impacts of the TCJA on customers. For details on these proceedings, see Note 2, Regulatory Matters.
Looking Forward
CMS Energy and Consumers will continue to consider the impact on the triple bottom line of people, planet, and profit in their daily operations as well as in their long-term strategic decisions. Consumers will continue to seek fair and timely regulatory treatment that will support its customer-driven investment plan, while pursuing cost-control measures that will allow it to maintain sustainable customer base rates. The Consumers Energy Way is an important means of realizing CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ purpose of achieving world class performance while delivering hometown service.


1821



Results of Operations
CMS Energy Consolidated Results of Operations
In Millions, Except Per Share AmountsIn Millions, Except Per Share Amounts In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018 Change  2019 2018 Change 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 Change 
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $93
 $139
 $(46) $306
 $380
 $(74) $243
 $213
 $30
Basic Earnings Per Average Common Share $0.33
 $0.49
 $(0.16) $1.08
 $1.35
 $(0.27) $0.86
 $0.75
 $0.11
Diluted Earnings Per Average Common Share $0.33
 $0.49
 $(0.16) $1.08
 $1.35
 $(0.27) $0.85
 $0.75
 $0.10
            
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018 Change  2019 2018 Change 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 Change 
Electric utility $90
 $130
 $(40) $195
 $269
 $(74) $118
 $105
 $13
Gas utility 8
 21
 (13) 129
 124
 5
 117
 121
 (4)
Enterprises 10
 14
 (4) 11
 29
 (18)
Corporate interest and other (15) (26) 11
 (29) (42) 13
Enterprises¹ 20
 7
 13
EnerBank¹ 14
 11
 3
Corporate interest and other¹ (26) (31) 5
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $93
 $139
 $(46) $306
 $380
 $(74) $243
 $213
 $30
1
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect changes in segment reporting.


1922

Table of Contents


Presented in the following table are specific after-tax changes to CMS Energy’s net income available to common stockholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018   $139
   $380
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $213
Reasons for the change            
Consumers electric utility and gas utility            
Electric sales $(32)   $(23)   $(23)  
Gas sales 
   18
   (37)  
Electric rate increase 14
   24
   5
  
Gas rate increase 5
   28
   48
  
Higher service restoration costs from 2019 winter storms 
   (25)  
Lower service restoration costs 25
  
Research and development tax credits 9
  
Higher mutual insurance distribution 5
  
Depreciation and amortization (8)   (21)   (13)  
Higher distribution and transmission expenses (3)   (10)  
Absence of 2018 settlement of a property tax appeal related to the J.H. Campbell plant 
   (7)  
Voluntary separation plan expenses (8)  
Higher property tax, reflecting higher capital spending (2)   (9)   (7)  
Absence of 2018 income tax benefit associated with electric cost of removal1
 (8)   (15)  
Absence of 2018 research and development tax credits1
 (2)   (9)  
Other (17) 

 (20) 

 5
 $9
   $(53)   $(69)
Enterprises            
Lower earnings due primarily to lower capacity revenue and higher operating and maintenance costs (13)   (27)  
Absence of 2018 expiration of indemnity obligation (3)   (3)  
Gain on sale of transmission equipment 12
 

 12
 

   (4)   (18)
Higher earnings due primarily to improved receivables management and lower operations and maintenance costs 7
  
Increased income tax benefit due primarily to production tax credits and restoring previously sequestered alternative minimum tax credits 6
 13
EnerBank    
Higher earnings based on growth in consumer lending in prior periods   3
Corporate interest and other            
Increased income tax benefit due primarily to production tax credits 8
   11
  
Higher earnings at EnerBank 3
   5
  
Absence of 2018 loss on early extinguishment of debt 4
   4
  
Increased income tax benefit due to restoring previously sequestered alternative minimum tax credits 5
  
Lower administrative and other expenses 3
  
Higher fixed charges due to higher debt (4) 

 (7) 

 (3) 5
   11
   13
June 30, 2019   $93
   $306
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $243
1
See Note 10, Income Taxes.


2023

Table of Contents


Consumers Electric Utility Results of Operations
Presented in the following table are the detailed changes to the electric utility’s net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 versus 2019 versus 2018:(amounts are presented pre-tax, with the exception of income tax changes):
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018   $130
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $105
Reasons for the change        
Electric deliveries1 and rate increases
        
Rate increase, including the impacts of the January 2019 order $22
   $7
  
Lower sales due primarily to unfavorable weather (51)   (28)  
Other revenues 6
 $(23) (1) $(22)
Maintenance and other operating expenses   (7)    
Lower service restoration costs 33
  
Higher mutual insurance distribution 7
  
Absence of favorable 2019 litigation settlement (8)  
Voluntary separation plan expenses (6)  
Retention benefits related to D.E. Karn2
 (4)  
Lower maintenance and other operating expenses 13
 35
Depreciation and amortization        
Increased plant in service, reflecting higher capital spending   (6)   (7)
General taxes   (1)   (1)
Other income, net of expenses   3
Interest charges   (3)   (4)
Income taxes        
Lower electric utility pre-tax earnings 10
  
Absence of 2018 income tax benefit associated with cost of removal2
 (7)  
Absence of 2018 research and development tax credits2
 (2)  
Higher other income taxes (1) 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019   $90
Lower tax expense due primarily to research and development tax credits3
 7
  
Lower other income taxes 2
 9
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $118
1 
Deliveries to end-use customers were 8.68.8 billion kWh in 20192020 and 9.2 billion kWh in 2018.2019.
2 
See Note 10,14, Exit Activities.
3
See Note 9, Income Taxes.


2124

Table of Contents

Presented in the following table are the detailed changes to the electric utility’s net income available to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2019 versus 2018:
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018   $269
Reasons for the change    
Electric deliveries1 and rate increases
    
Rate increase, including the impacts of the January 2019 order $35
  
Lower sales due primarily to unfavorable weather (40)  
Other revenues 10
 $5
Maintenance and other operating expenses    
Higher service restoration costs from 2019 winter storms (33)  
Higher distribution and transmission expenses (6)  
Lower mutual insurance distribution (4)  
Litigation settlement 8
  
Higher maintenance and other operating expenses (10) (45)
Depreciation and amortization    
Increased plant in service, reflecting higher capital spending   (15)
General taxes    
Absence of 2018 settlement of a property tax appeal related to the J.H. Campbell plant (9)  
Higher property tax, reflecting higher capital spending (4) 

Lower other general taxes 1
 (12)
Other income, net of expenses    
Lower other income, net of expenses   (1)
Interest charges   (1)
Income taxes    
Lower electric utility pre-tax earnings 18
  
Absence of 2018 income tax benefit associated with cost of removal2
 (14)  
Absence of 2018 research and development tax credits2
 (8)  
Higher other income taxes (1) (5)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019   $195
1
Deliveries to end-use customers were 17.8 billion kWh in 2019 and 18.5 billion kWh in 2018.
2
See Note 10, Income Taxes.


22

Table of Contents

Consumers Gas Utility Results of Operations
Presented in the following table are the detailed changes to the gas utility’s net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 versus 2019 versus 2018:(amounts are presented pre-tax, with the exception of income tax changes):
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018   $21
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $121
Reasons for the change        
Gas deliveries1 and rate increases
        
Rate increase, including the impacts of the September 2018 order $6
  
Rate increase, including the impacts of the September 2019 order $64
  
Lower sales due primarily to unfavorable weather (55)  
Lower energy waste reduction program revenues (8)  
Other revenues (1) $5
 6
 $7
Maintenance and other operating expenses        
Higher distribution and transmission expenses (3)  
Higher pipeline integrity expenses (4)  
Higher leak repair and survey expenses (3)  
Higher maintenance and other operating expenses (4) (14)
Lower energy waste reduction program costs 8
  
Voluntary separation plan expenses (4)  
Lower maintenance and other operating expenses 2
 6
Depreciation and amortization        
Increased plant in service, reflecting higher capital spending   (4)   (10)
General taxes        
Higher property tax, reflecting higher capital spending   (2) (7)  
Lower other general taxes 1
 (6)
Other income, net of expenses       2
Higher other income, net of expenses   1
Interest charges   (4)
Income taxes        
Lower gas utility pre-tax earnings 4
  
Higher other income taxes (3) 1
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019   $8
Lower tax expense due primarily to research and development tax credits2
   1
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $117
1 
Deliveries to end-use customers were 49120 bcf in 20192020 and 50142 bcf in 2018.2019.


23

Table of Contents

Presented in the following table are the detailed changes to the gas utility’s net income available to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2019 versus 2018:
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018   $124
Reasons for the change    
Gas deliveries1 and rate increases
    
Rate increase, including the impacts of the September 2018 order $29
  
Higher sales, due primarily to colder weather 24
  
Lower energy waste reduction program revenues (8)  
Other revenues (1) $44
Maintenance and other operating expenses    
Lower energy waste reduction program costs 8
  
Higher distribution and transmission expenses (7)  
Higher pipeline integrity expenses (4)  
Higher leak repair and survey expenses (4)  
Higher maintenance and other operating expenses (6) (13)
Depreciation and amortization    
Increased plant in service, reflecting higher capital spending   (13)
General taxes    
Higher property tax, reflecting higher capital spending   (9)
Other income, net of expenses    
Higher other income, net of expenses   2
Interest charges   (2)
Income taxes    
Higher gas utility pre-tax earnings (2)  
Higher other income taxes (2) (4)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019   $129
12 
Deliveries to end-use customers were 191 bcf in 2019 and 183 bcf in 2018.See Note 9, Income Taxes.
Enterprises Results of Operations
Presented in the following table are the detailed after-tax changes to the enterprises segment’s net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018   $14
Reason for the change    
Lower earnings due primarily to lower capacity revenue and higher operating and maintenance costs   $(13)
Absence of 2018 expiration of indemnity obligation   (3)
Gain on sale of transmission equipment1
   12
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019   $10
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $7
Reasons for the change    
Higher earnings due primarily to improved receivables management and lower operations and maintenance costs   $7
Increased income tax benefit due primarily to production tax credits and restoring previously sequestered alternative minimum tax credits   6
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $20
1
See Note 15, Asset Sales.


2425

Table of Contents


EnerBank Results of Operations
Presented in the following table are the detailed after-tax changes to the enterprises segment’sEnerBank’s net income available to common stockholders for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018   $29
Reason for the change    
Lower earnings due primarily to lower capacity revenue and higher operating and maintenance costs   $(27)
Absence of 2018 expiration of indemnity obligation   (3)
Gain on sale of transmission equipment1
   12
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019   $11
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $11
Reasons for the change    
Higher earnings based on growth in consumer lending in prior periods   $3
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $14
1
See Note 15, Asset Sales.
Corporate Interest and Other Results of Operations
Presented in the following table are the detailed after-tax changes to corporate interest and other results for the three months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018   (26)
Reasons for the change    
Increased income tax benefit due primarily to production tax credits   $8
Absence of 2018 loss on early extinguishment of debt   4
Higher earnings at EnerBank   3
Higher fixed charges due to higher debt   (4)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019   $(15)
Presented in the following table are the detailed after-tax changes to corporate interest and other results for the six months ended June 30, 2019 versus 2018:
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018   $(42)
Reasons for the change    
Increased income tax benefit due primarily to production tax credits   $11
Higher earnings at EnerBank   5
Absence of 2018 loss on early extinguishment of debt   4
Higher fixed charges due to higher debt   (7)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019   $(29)
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019   $(31)
Reasons for the change    
Increased income tax benefit due to restoring previously sequestered alternative minimum tax credits   $5
Lower administrative and other expenses   3
Higher fixed charges due to higher debt   (3)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020   $(26)


2526

Table of Contents


Cash Position, Investing, and Financing
At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, CMS Energy had $334$861 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, which included $22$27 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had $212$628 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, which included $16$24 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents. For additional details, see Note 13, Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Operating Activities
Presented in the following table are specific components of the changes to net cash provided by operating activities for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $1,416
Reasons for the change  
Lower net income $(74)
Non‑cash transactions1
 18
Unfavorable impact of changes in core working capital,2 due primarily to the absence of a 2018 receipt of alternative minimum tax credit refunds
 (118)
Unfavorable impact of changes in other assets and liabilities, due primarily to refunds to customers related to the TCJA (57)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $1,185
Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $1,098
Reasons for the change  
Lower net income $(70)
Non-cash transactions1
 23
Favorable impact of changes in core working capital2
 6
Favorable impact of changes in other assets and liabilities, due primarily to lower income taxes payments to CMS Energy, offset partially by refunds to customers related to the TCJA 53
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $1,110
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $617
Reasons for the change  
Higher net income $30
Non‑cash transactions1
 35
Higher pension contributions (531)
Favorable impact of changes in core working capital,2 due primarily to higher collections on gas deliveries in 2020
 41
Favorable impact of changes in other assets and liabilities, due primarily to the absence of 2019 refunds to customers related to the TCJA, offset partially by a payment to settle litigation 9
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $201
Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $619
Reasons for the change  
Higher net income $9
Non-cash transactions1
 43
Higher pension contributions (518)
Favorable impact of changes in core working capital,2 due primarily to higher collections on gas deliveries in 2020
 82
Favorable impact of changes in other assets and liabilities, due primarily to the absence of 2019 refunds to customers related to the TCJA, offset partially by higher income tax payments to CMS Energy 3
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $238
1 
Non‑cash transactions comprise depreciation and amortization, changes in deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, and other non‑cash operating activities and reconciling adjustments.
2 
Core working capital comprises accounts receivable, notes receivable, accrued revenue, inventories, accounts payable, and accrued rate refunds.


2627

Table of Contents


Investing Activities
Presented in the following table are specific components of the changes to net cash used in investing activities for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 versus 2018:2019:
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $(1,008)
Reasons for the change  
Higher capital expenditures $(101)
Changes in EnerBank notes receivable, reflecting growth in consumer lending (90)
Purchase of notes receivable by EnerBank in 2019 (220)
Other investing activities, primarily proceeds from sale of transmission equipment, offset partially by higher costs to retire property 9
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $(1,410)
Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $(914)
Reasons for the change  
Higher capital expenditures $(104)
Other investing activities, primarily higher costs to retire property (8)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $(1,026)
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $(675)
Reasons for the change  
Higher capital expenditures $(42)
Changes in EnerBank notes receivable, reflecting slower growth in consumer lending in 2020 42
Lower purchases of notes receivable by EnerBank 113
Other investing activities, primarily lower costs to retire property 3
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $(559)
Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $(502)
Reasons for the change  
Higher capital expenditures $(44)
Other investing activities, primarily lower costs to retire property 4
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $(542)


2728

Table of Contents


Financing Activities
Presented in the following table are specific components of net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:March 31, 2020 versus 2019:
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $(111)
Reasons for the change  
Higher debt issuances $661
Higher debt retirements (444)
Changes in EnerBank certificates of deposit, reflecting higher borrowings 235
Lower repayments under Consumers’ commercial paper program 73
Lower issuances of common stock under the continuous equity offering program (30)
Higher payments of dividends on common stock (14)
Other financing activities, primarily higher customer advances for construction, offset partially by higher debt issuance costs 14
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $384
Consumers  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 $27
Reasons for the change  
Lower debt issuances $(247)
Higher debt retirements (198)
Lower repayments under Consumers’ commercial paper program 73
Higher stockholder contribution from CMS Energy 425
Higher payments of dividends on common stock (27)
Other financing activities, primarily higher customer advances for construction 19
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 $72
In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $150
Reasons for the change  
Higher debt issuances $205
Lower debt retirements 788
Changes in EnerBank certificates of deposit, reflecting lower borrowings (158)
Higher repayments under Consumers’ commercial paper program (23)
Higher issuances of common stock, primarily the settlement of an equity forward sale contract 98
Higher payments of dividends on common stock (8)
Other financing activities, primarily lower debt issuance costs 10
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $1,062
Consumers  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 $(109)
Reasons for the change  
Higher debt issuances $873
Lower debt retirements 215
Higher repayments under Consumers’ commercial paper program (23)
Higher payments of dividends on common stock (47)
Other financing activities, primarily higher debt issuance costs (5)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 $904
Capital Resources and Liquidity
CMS Energy uses dividends and tax‑sharing payments from its subsidiaries and external financing and capital transactions to invest in its utility and non‑utility businesses, retire debt, pay dividends, and fund its other obligations. The ability of CMS Energy’s subsidiaries, including Consumers, to pay dividends to CMS Energy depends upon each subsidiary’s revenues, earnings, cash needs, and other factors. In addition, Consumers’ ability to pay dividends is restricted by certain terms included in its debt covenants and articles of incorporation and potentially by FERC requirements and provisions under the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act. For additional details on Consumers’ dividend restrictions, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization—Dividend Restrictions. For the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers paid $272$219 million in dividends on its common stock to CMS Energy.
Consumers uses cash flows generated from operations and external financing transactions, as well as stockholder contributions from CMS Energy, to fund capital expenditures, retire debt, pay dividends, and fund its other obligations. Consumers also uses these sources of funding to contribute to its employee benefit plans.
CMS Energy and Consumers expect to have sufficient liquidity to fund their commitments despite potential material uncertainties that may impact their cash management and financing strategies as a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic. CMS Energy and Consumers rely on the capital markets to fund their robust capital plan and those markets have faced significant strain. CMS Energy executed and funded a


29

Table of Contents


$300 million term loan facility in February 2020 and settled $100 million of its $250 million contracted forward equity in March 2020, which reduces CMS Energy’s need for external funding for the remainder of the year. Furthermore, Consumers issued $575 million of first mortgage bonds in March 2020. These transactions mitigate the potential impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ funding needs.In April 2020, Consumers redeemed $100 million of first mortgage bonds due in October 2020.With this transaction, CMS Energy and Consumers have no remaining outstanding debt maturing in 2020. For more information on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financing transactions, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.
Barring any sustained market dislocations or disruptions, CMS Energy and Consumers expect to continue to have ready access to the financial and capital markets and will continue to explore possibilities to take advantage of market opportunities as they arise with respect to future funding needs. If access to these markets were to diminish or otherwise become restricted, CMS Energy and Consumers would implement contingency plans to address debt maturities, which could include reduced capital spending. The COVID‑19 pandemic is a rapidly evolving situation and CMS Energy and Consumers cannot predict the ultimate impact it will have on their liquidity, debt covenants, financial condition, results of operations, or capital investment program.
As a result of a provision in the TCJA, as amended by the recently enacted CARES Act, CMS Energy is required towill recover all remaining alternative minimum tax credits over four years through offsets of regular tax and through cash refunds.in 2020. CMS Energy expects to be able to offset regularutilized $7 million of these credits on its 2019 consolidated tax return, and will receive the remaining $69 million through a cash refund. The CARES Act also provides for the usedeferral of federal net operating loss carryforwardspayroll taxes, which will allow CMS Energy and accordingly, receive alternative minimum tax credit refunds through 2021. Another provision in the TCJA excludes rate‑regulated utilities from 100 percent cost expensing of certain property. This provision will cause Consumers to make higher tax‑sharing payments to CMS Energy, whichdefer remittance of $40 million of payroll taxes in turn might permit CMS Energy to maintain lower levels of debt in order to invest in its businesses, pay dividends, and fund


28

Table of Contents

its general obligations. Consumers expects to have sufficient funding sources available to issue credits to customers for all impacts2020; half of the TCJA.deferred amount will be due at the end of 2021 and the other half will be due at the end of 2022.
In 2018, CMS Energy entered into an equity offering program under which it may sell, from time to time, shares of CMS Energy common stock having an aggregate sales price of up to $250 million. Under this program, CMS Energy may sell its common stock in privately negotiated transactions, in “at the market” offerings, through forward sales transactions or otherwise. At March 31, 2020, CMS Energy has entered intoEnergy’s remaining forward sales contracts havinghad an aggregate sales price of $250$150 million. These contracts allow CMS Energy to either physically settle the contracts by issuing shares of its common stock at the then‑applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement or net settle the contracts through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. CMS Energy may settle the contracts at any time through their maturity dates, and presently intends to physically settle the contracts by delivering shares of its common stock. For more information on the forward sale contracts, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.
Consumers uses cash flows generated from operations and external financing transactions, as well as stockholder contributions from CMS Energy, to fund capital expenditures, retire debt, pay dividends, contribute to its employee benefit plans, and fund its other obligations. Accelerated pension funding in prior years and several initiatives to reduce costs have helped improve cash flows from operating activities. Consumers anticipates continued strong cash flows from operating activities for 2019 and beyond.
Access to the financial and capital markets depends on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ credit ratings and on market conditions. As evidenced by past financing transactions, CMS Energy and Consumers have had ready access to these markets. Barring major market dislocations or disruptions, CMS Energy and Consumers expect to continue to have ready access to the financial and capital markets. If access to these markets were to diminish or otherwise become restricted, CMS Energy and Consumers would implement contingency plans to address debt maturities, which could include reduced capital spending.Capitalization—Issuance of Common Stock.
At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, CMS Energy had $548$521 million of its revolving credit facility available and Consumers had $1,078 million$1.1 billion available under its revolving credit facilities. CMS Energy and Consumers use these credit facilities for general working capital purposes and to issue letters of credit. An additional source of liquidity is Consumers’ commercial paper program, which allows Consumers to issue, in one or more placements, up to $500 million in the aggregate in commercial paper notes with maturities of up to 365 days and that bearat market interest at fixed or floating rates. These issuances are supported by Consumers’ revolving credit facilities. While the amount of outstanding commercial paper does not reduce the available capacity of the revolving credit facilities, Consumers does not intend to issue commercial paper in an amount exceeding the available capacity of the facilities. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, there were no commercial paper notes outstanding under this program. For additional details on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.


29

Table of Contents

Certain of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ credit agreements, debt indentures, and other facilities contain covenants that require CMS Energy and Consumers to maintain certain financial ratios, as defined therein. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, no default had occurred with respect to any financial covenants contained in


30

Table of Contents


CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ credit agreements, debt indentures, or other facilities. CMS Energy and Consumers were each in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, as presented in the following table:
 June 30, 2019March 31, 2020
Credit Agreement, Indenture, or FacilityLimit Actual 
CMS Energy, parent only   
Debt to EBITDA1
EBITDA¹
<6.25 to 1.04.65.1 to 1.0
Consumers   
Debt to Capital2
Capital²
<0.65 to 1.00.45 to 1.0
Debt to Capital3
<0.65 to 1.00.460.49 to 1.0
1 
Applies to CMS Energy’s $550 million revolving credit agreement and $165$300 million term loan credit agreement.
2 
Applies to Consumers’ $850 million and $250 million revolving credit agreements, and its $30 million reimbursement agreement.
3
Applies to Consumers’and $35 million reimbursement agreements, and its $300 million term loan credit agreement.
Components of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ cash management plan include controlling operating expenses and capital expenditures and evaluating market conditions for financing and refinancing opportunities. CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ present level of cash and expected cash flows from operating activities, together with access to sources of liquidity, are anticipated to be sufficient to fund the companies’ contractual obligations for 20192020 and beyond.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain of their subsidiaries enter into various arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties. These arrangements include indemnities, surety bonds, letters of credit, and financial and performance guarantees. Indemnities are usually agreements to reimburse a counterparty that may incur losses due to outside claims or breach of contract terms. The maximum payment that could be required under a number of these indemnity obligations is not estimable; the maximum obligation under indemnities for which such amounts were estimable was $153 million at June 30, 2019. WhileAdditionally, CMS Energy has entered into forward sales contracts to sell its common stock in order to invest in its utility and Consumers believe it is unlikely that they will incur any material losses related to indemnities theynon-utility businesses; as of March 31, 2020, these contracts have not recorded as liabilities, they cannot predict the impactan aggregate sales price of these contingent obligations on their liquidity$150 million and financial condition.mature in 2021. For additional details on thesethe companies’ indemnity and other guarantee arrangements, see Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments—Guarantees. For additional details on letters of credit and CMS Energy’s forward sales contracts, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.
Outlook
Several business trends and uncertainties may affect CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financial condition and results of operations. These trends and uncertainties could have a material impact on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ consolidated income, cash flows, or financial position. For additional details regarding these and other uncertainties, see Forward-Looking Statements and Information; Note 2, Regulatory Matters; Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments; and Part II—Item 1A. Risk Factors.


30

Table of Contents

Consumers Electric Utility Outlook and Uncertainties
Clean Energy Resource Planning:Plan: While Consumers continues to experience modest growth in demand for electricity due to Michigan’s growing economy and increased use of air conditioning, consumer electronics, and other electric devices, it expects that increase in demand to be offset by the effects of energy efficiency and conservation.
In June 2018, Consumers filed an IRP with the MPSC detailing its long‑term strategy for delivering reliable and affordable energy to its customers through the increased use of energy efficiency and customer demand management programs and additional renewable energy. In March 2019, Consumers and a broad coalition of key stakeholders, including business customers, environmental groups, the MPSC Staff, and the Michigan Attorney General, filed a settlement agreement with the MPSC and the MPSC approved itthe IRP that Consumers filed in June 2019.
2018, which details its Clean Energy Plan. Through its IRP,Clean Energy Plan, Consumers expects to reduce carbon emissions of its owned generation by more than 90 percent from its 2005 levels by 2040 and eliminate the use of coal to generate electricity by 2040. The Clean Energy Plan also provides the foundation for Consumers’ recently announced goal to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2040. Under this net-zero goal, Consumers plans


31

Table of Contents


to eliminate the impact of carbon emissions created by the electricity it generates or purchases for customers.
Specifically, the IRPClean Energy Plan provides for:
the retirement of the D.E. Karn 1 & 2 coal‑fueled generating units, totaling 515
the retirement of the D.E. Karn 1 & 2 coal-fueled generating units, totaling 503 MW, in 2023
the continued assessment in future IRP filings concerning the retirement of the J.H. Campbell 1 & 2 coal‑fueledcoal-fueled generating units, totaling 608609 MW, in 2025 or earlier
Under the IRP,Clean Energy Plan, Consumers will replace the capacity to be retired with:
increased demand response programs
increased energy efficiency
increased renewable energy generation
conservation voltage reduction
increased pumped storage
Consumers will competitively bid new capacity and at least 50 percent of the new capacity will be built and owned by third parties; the remainder will be owned and operated by Consumers. In accordance with the 2016support of its Clean Energy Law, the IRP also enablesPlan, Consumers issued a request for proposals in September 2019 to earn a financial incentive on PPAs approved by the MPSC after January 1, 2019.
The IRP also allows for recovery of significant increases in demand response costs. Consumers is requiredacquire up to file a new IRP by June 2021.
PURPA: PURPA requires Consumers to purchase power from qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities at a price approved by the MPSC that is meant to represent Consumers’ “avoided cost” of generating power or purchasing power from another source. In November 2017, the MPSC issued an order establishing a new avoided‑cost methodology for determining the price that Consumers must pay to purchase power under PURPA. Among other things, the MPSC’s order changes the basis of Consumers’ avoided cost from the cost of coal‑fueled generating units to that of natural gas‑fueled generating units. The MPSC order also assigns more capacity value to qualifying facilities that are consistently able to generate electricity during peak times. Although the costs Consumers incurs to purchase power from qualifying facilities are passed on to customers, the order could result in mandated purchases of generation, potentially at above‑market prices, and reduce Consumers’ need for new owned generation. This in turn could have a material adverse effect on Consumers’ capital investment plan and the affordability of future customer rates.
In December 2017, Consumers filed a petition with the MPSC requesting corrections to the pricing calculations and capacity purchase model set in the November 2017 order. Subsequently, the MPSC suspended the implementation of the order and reopened the proceeding. In February 2018, the MPSC


31


issued an order limiting Consumers’ obligation to pay the full avoided capacity cost, which is based on the cost of a natural gas combustion turbine under the new avoided‑cost formula, to existing qualifying facilities upon the expiration of outstanding contracts and to the first 150300 MW of new capacity from projects to be operational in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula by May 2022. Specifically, Consumers solicited offers to enter into PPAs with or purchase solar generation projects that qualify under PURPA. In October 2018, the MPSC issued an order lifting the suspension on the November 2017 orderranging in size from 20 MW to 150 MW and thereby making effective the avoided‑cost formula set at that time. According to the October 2018 order, the useenter into PPAs with PURPA qualifying facilities up to 20 MW. Any contracts entered into as a result of the full avoided‑cost formula is still limited to outstanding contracts that expire and the first 150 MW of new qualifying generation projects. The October 2018 order also provides that all other qualifying generation projects that establish a legally enforceable obligation are eligible to receive a capacity payment equal to the MISO planning resource auction price and a designated energy price approved in the MPSC’s October order. The MPSC also ruled that the determination of Consumers’ future capacity needs would take place in Consumers’ IRP proceeding.
In November 2018, Consumers made a filing in support of another party’s request that the MPSC stay the effectiveness of its October 2018 order. In February 2019, Consumers filed a petition with the MPSC challenging the rates approved in the October 2018 order, and it separately filed a request to withdraw a tariff provision incorporating those rates. In June 2019, the MPSC denied both of these requests, as well as the prior request for a stay of the October 2018 order. Five PURPA developers, representing approximately 2,100 MW of alleged qualifying generation projects, have filed complaints with theproposals would be subject to MPSC claiming that their projects have legally enforceable obligations making them eligible for the avoided cost rates approved in the October 2018 order. One of those developers is challenging aspects of the MPSC’s October 2018 order in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
In the approved IRP settlement agreement, Consumers agreed to a new method of calculating avoided cost, based on a competitive bidding process that will enable Consumers to purchase energy from new generation at the lowest cost and mitigate the risk of forced purchases of unneeded renewable generation. Consumers cannot predict the outcome of these matters.approval.
Renewable Energy Plan: The 2016 Energy Law raised the renewable energy standard from the present ten‑percent requirement to 15 percent in 2021, with an interim target of 12.5 percent in 2019. Consumers met the interim target for 2019 and will demonstrate its compliance by filing the 2019 renewable energy cost reconciliation with the MPSC in June 2020. Consumers is required to submit RECs, which represent proof that the associated electricity was generated from a renewable energy resource, in an amount equal to at least the required percentage of Consumers’ electric sales volume each year. Under its renewable energy plan, Consumers expects to meet its renewable energy requirement each year with a combination of newly generated RECs and previously generated RECs carried over from prior years.
In conjunction with itsUnder Consumers’ renewable energy plan, Consumers began construction in 2017 of Cross Winds®Energy Park Phase III, with a planned nameplate capacity of 76 MW, and expects it to be operational in 2020. This project is expected to qualify for certain federal production tax credits, generating cost savings that will be passed on to customers.
In February 2019, the MPSC issued an order ruling on amendments Consumers had requested to its renewable energy plan. The MPSChas approved the acquisition of up to 525 MW of new wind generation projects but ruled that Consumers’ requestand authorized Consumers to acquire up to 100 MWearn a 10.7 percent return on equity on any projects approved by the MPSC. Specifically, the MPSC has approved the following:
purchase of new solar generation will be addressed in a separate proceeding. The MPSC also approved an agreement under which Consumers will purchase a wind generation project under development, with capacity of up to 150 MW, in Gratiot County, Michigan. Consumers expects to beginMichigan; on-site construction of this projectbegan during the fourth quarter of 2019 and that it willthe project is slated to be complete and operational in 2020. In June 2019, Consumers entered into an agreement to 2020
purchase of a wind generation project under development, in Michigan, with capacity of up to 166 MW.MW, in Hillsdale, Michigan; Consumers expectsis slated to take full ownership and begin commercial operation of the project in 2020. The2020
execution of a 20-year agreement under which Consumers will purchase 100 MW of renewable capacity, energy, and RECs from a 149-MW solar generating facility to be constructed in Calhoun County, Michigan; the facility is subjectexpected to MPSC approval.be operational in 2021
As a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic, Consumers has received force majeure notifications from the turbine supplier and engineering, procurement, and construction contractors for the two wind generation


32



In June 2018,projects. As this time, construction activities continue and Consumers issued a requestdoes not anticipate any changes to the projects’ expected commercial operation dates, overall cost, or ability to qualify for proposals to acquire up to 400 MW of wind generation projects and up to 100 MW of solar generation projects, all of which are required to be located in Michigan. Negotiations are in progress with bidders. Any contracts entered into as a resultproduction tax credits, but Consumers cannot predict the ultimate impact of the request for proposals would be subject to MPSC approval. Consumers is authorized to earn a 10.7 percent return on equity on any projects approved by the MPSC.force majeure notifications.
Electric Customer Deliveries and Revenue: Consumers’ electric customer deliveries are seasonal and largely dependent on Michigan’s economy. The consumption of electric energy typically increases in the summer months, due primarily to the use of air conditioners and other cooling equipment. In addition, Consumers’ electric rates, which follow a seasonal rate design, are higher in the summer months than in the remaining months of the year. Beginning in June 2020, electric residential customers will transition to a summer peak time-of-use rate that will allow them to take advantage of lower-cost energy during off-peak times during the summer months. Thus, customers could reduce their electric bills by shifting their consumption from on-peak to off-peak times.
As a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic, on March 23, 2020, Michigan’s Governor issued an executive order requiring all non-essential businesses to close temporarily and Michigan residents to stay home until April 13, 2020; this order has since been extended to May 15, 2020 and amended in scope to allow some additional business and personal activities. Since the issuance of the order, Consumers has experienced declines in weather-normalized commercial and industrial demand of over 20 percent compared to the same period of 2019. These declines, however, have been offset partially by residential load, which has increased by over five percent over the same period. While Consumers anticipates a decline in electric deliveries to commercial and industrial customers in the near term as a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic, it cannot predict the impact on full-year 2020 deliveries at this time.
Consumers has suspended shut-offs of service for non-payment and extended payment protection plans for low-income and senior customers through June 1, 2020. In light of the expected economic impacts of the pandemic, Consumers anticipates increased uncollectible accounts in the near term, but cannot predict the long-term impact of the pandemic on Michigan’s economy or its customers.
Over the long term, Consumers expects weather‑normalizedweather-normalized electric deliveries over the next five years to remain stable relative to 2018.decrease slightly. This outlook reflects modest growth in electric demand offset by the effects of energy waste reduction programs and appliance efficiency standards.standards offset largely by modest growth in electric demand. Actual delivery levels will depend on:
energy conservation measures and results of energy waste reduction programs
weather fluctuations
Michigan’s economic conditions, including utilization, expansion, or contraction of manufacturing facilities, population trends, and housing activity
Electric ROA: Michigan law allows electric customers in Consumers’ service territory to buy electric generation service from alternative electric suppliers in an aggregate amount capped at ten percent, with certain exceptions, of Consumers’ weather‑normalized retail sales of the preceding calendar year.exceptions. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, electric deliveries under the ROA program were at the ten‑percentten-percent limit. Of Consumers’ 1.8 million electric customers, 285 customers,fewer than 300, or 0.02 percent, purchased electric generation service under the ROA program.
The 2016 Energy Law established a path to ensure that forward capacity is secured for all electric customers in Michigan, including customers served by alternative electric suppliers under ROA. The new law also authorized the MPSC to ensure that alternative electric suppliers have procured enough capacity to cover their anticipated capacity requirements for the four‑yearfour-year forward period. In 2017, the MPSC issued an order establishing a state reliability mechanism for Consumers. Under this mechanism, beginning June 1, 2018, if an alternative electric supplier does not demonstrate that it has procured its capacity requirements for the four‑yearfour-year forward period, its customers will pay a set charge to the utility for capacity that is not provided by the alternative electric supplier. All alternative electric suppliers have


33



demonstrated that they have procured their capacity requirements through the MISO planning year beginning June 1, 2022.2023.
In June 2018,During 2017, the MPSC issued an order requiringorders finding that it has statutory authority to determine and implement a local clearing requirement, which requires all electric suppliers to demonstrate that a portion of the capacity procured to serve customers during peak demand times is located in the MISO footprint in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. In July 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a decision that the MPSC does not have statutory authority to implement such a requirement for individual alternative electric suppliers. Consumers believes the 2016 Energy Law does give such authorization to the MPSC. The MPSC and Consumers have filed applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals’ decision to the Michigan Supreme Court. In June 2019,April 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court issued orders directinga unanimous opinion reversing the filingCourt of supplemental briefsAppeals’ decision and determined that the scheduling of oral arguments in2016 Energy Law authorizes the MPSC to implement a local clearing requirement on individual alternative electric suppliers. The Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case and will ultimately decide whetherto the Court of Appeals to consider a procedural challenge previously undecided by the Court of Appeals; this challenge concerns the process that the MPSC used in 2017 to consider a local clearing requirement and rule ondoes not affect the appeals.substance of the MPSC’s authority to implement a local clearing requirement for future planning periods. In April 2020, ABATE filed a motion for rehearing of the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision. Consumers will file a response to oppose the motion.
Electric Rate Matters: Rate matters are critical to Consumers’ electric utility business. For additional details on rate matters, see Note 2, Regulatory Matters.
2020 Electric Rate Case: In February 2020, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual rate increase of $244 million, based on a 10.5 percent authorized return on equity and a projected twelve-month period ending December 31, 2021. The filing requests authority to recover new investment in distribution system reliability and technology enhancements. Presented in the following table are the components of the requested increase in revenue:
In Millions 
Projected Twelve-Month Period Ending December 31 2021
Components of the requested rate increase  
Investment in rate base $181
Operating and maintenance costs 108
Cost of capital 27
Sales (36)
TCJA deferred federal income taxes amortization (36)
Total $244
The filing also seeks approval to recover $13 million associated with Consumers’ deferral of depreciation and property tax expense and the overall rate of return on distribution-related capital investments exceeding certain threshold amounts. This deferred accounting treatment was approved by the MPSC in January 2019.
Additionally, the filing seeks approval of a method of recovering amounts earned under the financial compensation mechanism approved by the MPSC in Consumers’ IRP. This mechanism allows Consumers to earn a financial incentive on PPAs approved by the MPSC after January 1, 2019. In the filing, Consumers requests recovery of $3 million, beginning in January 2021, for incentives earned and to be earned on PPA payments during 2019 through 2021.
Consumers also proposes in the filing a new distributed generation tariff to replace the current net metering tariff, pursuant to the 2016 Energy Law. The proposed distributed generation tariff is consistent


3334



with other distributed generation tariffs already approved by the MPSC and would substantially reduce the subsidies paid by non-distributed generation customers under the current net metering program. 
Electric Environmental Outlook: Consumers’ operations are subject to various state and federal environmental laws and regulations. Consumers estimates that it will incur capital expenditures of $0.3 billion$275 million from 20192020 through 20232024 to continue to comply with RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and numerous state and federal environmental regulations. Consumers expects to recover these costs in customer rates, but cannot guarantee this result. Consumers’ primary environmental compliance focus includes, but is not limited to, the following matters.
Air Quality: Multiple air quality regulations apply, or may apply, to Consumers.
CSAPR, which became effective in 2015, requires Michigan and many other states to improve air quality by reducing power plant emissions that, according to EPA computer models, contribute to ground‑level ozone and fine particle pollution in other downwind states. In 2016, the EPA finalized new ozone season standards for CSAPR, which became effective in 2017. CSAPRAny litigation or remand to the EPA is presently being litigated; however, any decision will not expected to impact Consumers’ compliance strategy, as Consumers expects its emissions to be within the CSAPR allowance allocations.
In 2012, the EPA published emission standards for electric generating units, known as MATS, based on Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, known as MATS.Act. Under MATS, all of Consumers’ existing coal‑fueled electric generating units were required to add additional controls for hazardous air pollutants. Consumers met the extended deadline of April 2016 for five coal‑fueled units and two oil/gas‑fueled units it continues to operate and retired its seven remaining coal‑fueled units. MATS is presently being litigated. In addition, in December 2018, the EPA proposed changes to the supporting analysis used to justify MATS, but did not propose any changes to the MATS regulations. Any changes resulting from that litigation or rulemaking are not expected to be minor and should not impact Consumers’ MATS compliance strategy becausestrategy. If the MATS regulations were repealed, Consumers is stillwould then be required to comply with the Michigan Mercury Rule, which has similar requirements to MATS. In addition, Consumers must comply with its settlement agreement with the EPA entered into in 2014 concerning opacity and NSR.NSR, which has similar emission requirements to MATS.
In 2015, the EPA lowered the NAAQS for ozone. The new ozone NAAQS will make it more difficult to construct or modify power plants and other emission sources in areas of the country that have not met the new ozone standard. In April 2018, the EPA designated certain areas of Michigan as not meeting the new standard with an August 2018 effective date. None of Consumers’ fossil‑fuel‑fired generating units are located in these areas. Some of Consumers’ compressor stations are located in areas impacted by the rule, but Consumers expects only minor permitting impacts if those units are modified in the future. The NAAQS for ozone are presently being litigated. Consumers does not expect that any decisionlitigation involving NAAQS for ozone will have a material adverse impact on its generating assets.
Consumers’ strategy to comply with air quality regulations, including CSAPR, NAAQS, and MATS, as well as its legal obligations, involved the installation and operation of emission control equipment at some facilities and the suspension of operations at others; however, Consumers continues to evaluate these rules in conjunction with other EPA and EGLE rulemakings, litigation, and congressional action. This evaluation could result in:
a change in Consumers’ fuel mix
changes in the types of generating units Consumers may purchase or build in the future
changes in how certain units are used
the retirement, mothballing, or repowering with an alternative fuel of some of Consumers’ generating units
changes in Consumers’ environmental compliance costs


35



Greenhouse Gases: There have been numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives at the state, regional, national, and international levels that involve the potential regulation of greenhouse gases. Consumers


34


continues to monitor and comment on these initiatives and to follow litigation involving greenhouse gases.
In 2015, the EPA finalized new rules pursuant to Section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act to limit carbon dioxide emissions from new electric generating units, as well as modified or reconstructed electric generating units. New coal‑fueled units would not be able to meet this limit without installing carbon dioxide control equipment using such methods as carbon capture and sequestration. These rules are being litigated.
In December 2018, the EPA proposed a revised Section 111(b) regulation to replace the 2015 standard rule limiting carbon dioxide emissions from new electric generating units, citing limited availability and high costs of carbon capture and sequestration equipment as reasons to change the 2015 rule. The revised Section 111(b) regulation requires new coal‑fueled generating units to meet a highly efficient steam cycle performance standard. Consumers does not expect this proposal to change its existing environmental strategy.
Also in 2015, the EPA published final rules pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to limit carbon dioxide emissions from existing electric generating units, calling the rules the “Clean Power Plan.” Certain states, corporations, and industry groups initiated litigation opposing the proposed Clean Power Plan, and in 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the Clean Power Plan while the litigation proceeded. In 2017, the EPA and other federal agencies were directed to review the Clean Power Plan, and the EPA published a proposal to repeal it. In June 2019, the EPA released a final rule repealing the Clean Power Plan.
In August 2018, the EPA proposed the “Affordable Clean Energy” rule as a replacement for the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. There was also a proposal to modify the Clean Air Act permitting requirements. The EPA finalized the Affordable Clean Energy rule in June 2019, but did not include the proposal to modify the Clean Air Act permitting requirements.rule. The Affordable Clean Energy rule requires individual states to evaluate coal‑fueledcoal-fueled power plants for heat‑rate improvements that could increase overall plant efficiency. The evaluations to be performed by the State of Michigan under the final rule may require Consumers to make heat-rate improvements be made at Consumers’its remaining coal-fueled units beginning in the mid-2020s.mid‑2020s. This rule is presently being litigated. Consumers cannot evaluate the potential impact of the rule until the State of Michigan completes its evaluations.
In 2015, a group of 195 countries, including the U.S., finalized the Paris Agreement, which governs carbon dioxide reduction measures beginning in 2020. Although the U.S. subsequently withdrewhas begun the process of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, it has stated a desire to renegotiate a new agreement in the future. At this time, Consumers does not expect any adverse changes to its environmental strategy as a result of these events.
While Consumers cannot predict the outcome of changes in U.S. policy or of other legislative or regulatory initiatives involving the potential regulation of greenhouse gases, it intends to continue to move forward with its clean energy plan,Clean Energy Plan, its present net-zero carbon reduction goal, and its emphasis on supply diversity. Consumers will continue to monitor regulatory and legislative activity and related litigation regarding greenhouse gas emissions standards that may affect electric generating units.
Severe weather events and climate change associated with increasing levels of greenhouse gases could affect the companies’Consumers’ facilities and energy sales and could have a material impact on the companies’its future results of operations. Consumers is unable to predict these events or their financial impact; however, Consumers plans for adverse weather and takesevaluates the possible physical impacts of climate change on its operations and is taking steps to reduce its potential impact.
Litigation, international treaties, federal laws and regulations (including regulations by the EPA), and state laws and regulations, if enacted or ratified, could ultimately require Consumers to replace


35


equipment, install additional emission control equipment, purchase emission allowances or credits, curtail operations, arrange for alternative sources of supply, mothball or retire facilities that generate certain emissions, pursue energy efficiency or demand response measures more swiftly, or take other steps to manage or lower the emission of greenhouse gases. Although associated capital or operating costs relating to greenhouse gas regulation or legislation could be material and cost recovery cannot be assured, Consumers expects to recover these costs and capital expenditures in rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations.


36



CCRs: In 2015, the EPA published a final rule regulating CCRs such as coal ash, under RCRA. The final rule adopts minimum standards for beneficially reusing and disposing of non‑hazardous CCRs. The rule establishes new minimum requirements for site location, groundwater monitoring, flood protection, storm water design, fugitive dust control, and public disclosure of information, including any groundwater protection standard exceedances. The rule also sets out conditions under which CCR units would be forced to cease receiving CCR and non‑CCR wastewastewater and initiate closure based on the inability to achieve minimum safety standards, meet a location standard, or meet minimum groundwater standards. Consumers has aligned with state regulatory authoritiesEGLE on closure plans for each of its unlined ash ponds to ensure coordination between federal and state requirements. Work has already been completed to close some existingThe unlined ash ponds have ceased operation and replace themhave been replaced with double‑lineddouble-lined ash ponds or concrete tanks. Significant closure work has been completed at the remaining ash ponds.
Furthermore,Due to litigation, many aspects of the 2015 CCR rule have been remanded to the EPA, which has resulted in various new rulemakings. These new rulemakings are now in litigation. Continued litigation will add uncertainty around requirements for compliance and state permit programs.
Separately, Congress passed legislation in 2016 allowing participating states to develop permitting programs for CCRs under RCRA. In July 2018, the EPA published preliminary rulemaking that was intended to amend the 2015 final rule. The rulemaking did not change Consumers’ compliance strategy, but demonstrated the EPA’s willingness to allow states to incorporate flexibility into their permitting processes. Consumers is waiting for the EPA to promulgate a final rule. In December 2018, Michigan Legislature adopted a permitting program, which requires the EPA’s authorization. This program should reduce costly, duplicative oversight over CCRs and provide local oversight to CCR issues unique to Michigan. EGLE submitted the state CCR permit program application to Michigan’s Attorney General in June 2019 for review and signature. The Attorney General signed the application in March 2020. EGLE is presently working on an application requesting such authorizationpreparing the final package for submission to the Michigan permitting program.EPA. Federal rulemaking delays also have the potential tochallenges may delay EPA approval of the Michigan permitting program.
The State of Michigan recently enacted revisions to its solid waste management statute to incorporate federal requirements for CCR landfills and surface impoundments. Consumers has aligned with EGLE on closure plans for all of its coal ash disposal sites, including those subject to the EPA’s 2015 CCR rule, and adjusted its recorded ARO accordingly. Consumers has historically been authorized to recover in electric rates costs related to coal ash disposal sites.
Water:Multiple water-related regulations apply, or may apply, to Consumers.
The EPA’s rule to regulate theEPA regulates cooling water intake systems of existing electric generating plants under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act became effectiveand the corresponding rules that were revised in 2014. The rule isrules are aimed at reducing alleged harmful impacts on fish and shellfish.aquatic organisms, such as fish. In April 2018, Consumers submitted to EGLE for review and approval all required studies and recommended plans to comply with Section 316(b), but has not yet received final approval.
In 2015, the EPA released its final effluent limitation guidelines.guidelines for steam electric generating plants. These guidelines, which are presently being litigated, set stringent new requirements for the discharge from electric generating units into wastewater streams. In August 2017, the EPA announced that it will undertake a rulemaking to replace specific portions of the rule. In September 2017, the EPArule and proposed delaying the compliance start dates for two years, but maintained the compliance end dates. Consumers expects that additionalAdditional rulemaking will beginbegan in November 2019 and likely concludewill continue in 2020. Consumers does not expect any adverse changes to its environmental strategy as a result of any revisions to the rule.
In 2015,recent years, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a final rulehave proposed rules redefining “waters“Waters of the United States,” which defines the scope of the EPA’sfederal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Numerous statesAct, and other interested parties have filed suits in federal courts to block the rule, which subsequently was stayed in 2015 while litigation ensued. In January 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the federal district courts, not the federal appellate courts, had jurisdiction over challengeschanges to the 2015


36


rule. Consequently, in February 2018,Clean Water Act regulations. For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit lifted the stay of the rule. The EPA has publishedrecently finalized a notice, called the Applicability Rule, that preventsrule repealing the 2015 rule from going into effect until February 2020 in an attempt to maintain consistency and provide certainty for regulated entities while the agencies continue to consider possible revisions to the 2015 rule. In August 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Districtdefinition of South Carolina set aside the Applicability Rule nationally and, as a result, the 2015 rule again went into effect in 22 states, including Michigan.
In December 2018, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule re‑defining the term “waters“Waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. In 2015, the EPA under President Obama approvedand, in January 2020, released a rule expanding thewith its new definition. These rules are presently being, or are likely to be, litigated.
A final definition particularly with respect to tributaries, adjacent waters, and wetlands. The EPA’s recently proposed rule narrows the definition of jurisdictional waters.
The 2015 and 2018 ruleswould change the scope of water and wetlands regulations for the EPA under the Clean Water Act. The EPA has delegated authority to manage the Michigan wetlands program to EGLE.EGLE for a large portion


37



of Consumers’ service territory, but dual jurisdiction exists between the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in some locations in Michigan. As a result, regardless of the 2015 and 2018 rules’ ultimate outcome of the EPA’s rules, Consumers expects to continue to operate under Michigan’s wetlands regulations, and under the applicable state and federal water jurisdictional regulations. Thus, Consumers does not expect any material adverse changes to its environmental strategy as a result of these events.events, but under an expanded federal definition, could experience permitting delays for infrastructure projects where dual jurisdiction exists.
Many of Consumers’ facilities maintain NPDES permits, which are renewed every five years and are vital to the facilities’ operations. Failure of EGLE to renew any NPDES permit, a successful appeal against a permit, a change in the interpretation or scope of NPDES permitting, or onerous terms contained in a permit could have a significant detrimental effect on the operations of a facility.
Other Matters: Other electric environmental matters could have a material impact on Consumers’ outlook. For additional details on other electric environmental matters, see Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments—Consumers Electric Utility Contingencies—Electric Environmental Matters.
Retention Incentive Program: In October 2019, Consumers announced a retention incentive program to ensure necessary staffing at the D.E. Karn generating complex through the anticipated retirement of the coal-fueled generating units. Based on the number of employees that have chosen to participate, the aggregate cost of the program through 2023 is estimated to be $35 million. Consumers expects to recognize up to $15 million of expense related to retention benefits in 2020. Consumers is seeking recovery of these costs from customers in its 2020 electric rate case. For additional details on this program, see Note 14, Exit Activities.
Consumers Gas Utility Outlook and Uncertainties
Gas Deliveries: Consumers’ gas customer deliveries are seasonal. The peak demand for natural gas typically occurs in the winter due to colder temperatures and the resulting use of natural gas as heating fuel.
Consumers does not anticipate that the COVID‑19 pandemic will have a material impact on near-term gas deliveries, but cannot predict the impact on full-year 2020 deliveries at this time. In light of the expected economic impacts of the pandemic, Consumers anticipates increased uncollectible accounts in the near term, but cannot predict the long-term impact of the pandemic on Michigan’s economy or its customers.
Over the long term, Consumers expects weather‑normalized gas deliveries over the next five years to increase slightlyremain stable relative to 2018.2019. This outlook reflects modest growth in gas demand offset partially by the predicted effects of energy efficiency and conservation. Actual delivery levels from year to year may vary from this expectation as a result of:
weather fluctuations
use by power producers
availability and development of renewable energy sources
gas price changes
Michigan economic conditions, including population trends and housing activity
the price of competing energy sources or fuels
energy efficiency and conservation impacts
Gas Rate Matters: Rate matters are critical to Consumers’ gas utility business. For additional details on rate matters, see Note 2, Regulatory Matters.


38



2019 Gas Rate Case:In November 2018,December 2019, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual rate increase of $229$245 million, based on a 10.7510.5 percent authorized return on equity.equity and a projected twelve-month period ending September 30, 2021. The filing requests authority to recover new infrastructure investment and related costs that will allow Consumers to improve system safety capacity, and deliverability. The filing also requests approval of a revenue decoupling


37


mechanism that would annually reconcile Consumers’ actual weather‑normalized, non‑fuel revenues with the revenues approved by the MPSC.
In April 2019, Consumers reduced its requested annual rate increase to $204 million and withdrew its request for an investment recovery mechanism.reliability. Presented in the following table are the components of the revised request:requested increase in revenue:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Projected Twelve-Month Period Ending September 30 2021
Components of the requested rate increase    
Investment in rate base $131
 $126
Operating and maintenance cost 76
Operating and maintenance costs 91
Cost of capital 27
 26
Working capital 11
Gross margin (28)
Effects of TCJA (13)
Sales 2
Total $204
 $245
The filing also seeks approval of a revenue decoupling mechanism that would annually reconcile Consumers’ actual weather-normalized non-fuel revenues with the revenues approved by the MPSC; similar to the mechanism previously approved by the MPSC, this reconciliation would commence when the projected twelve-month period covered by the filing ends and continue until the MPSC resets rates in a subsequent rate case.
Gas Pipeline and Storage Integrity and Safety: In 2016,October 2019, PHMSA published a notice of proposed rulemakingfinal rule that would expandexpands federal safety standards for gas transmission pipelines. TheTo comply with the rule, could cause Consumers towill incur increased capital costs to install and remediate pipelines as well as increased operating and maintenance costs to expand inspections, maintenance, and monitoring of its existing pipelines. PHMSA expects to publish a final ruleThe requirements in 2019.the regulation take effect July 1, 2020, with various implementation phases over numerous years.
Also in 2016,In February 2020, PHMSA publishedfinalized an interim final rule thatit had published in 2016; this rule established minimum federal safety standards for underground natural gas storage facilities. As published,To comply with the rule, could cause Consumers to incurincurred increased capital and operating and maintenance costs to expand inspections, maintenance, and monitoring of its underground gas storage facilities. PHMSA expects to publish a final rule in 2019.
Although associated capital or operating and maintenance costs relating to these regulations could be material and cost recovery cannot be assured, Consumers would expectexpects to recover such costs and capital expenditures in rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with laws and regulations. Consumers will continue to monitor gas safety regulations and is implementing the American Petroleum Institute’s Recommended Practice 1173, Pipeline Safety Management Systems. This program ensures that there are policies, procedures, work instructions, forms, and records in place so thatto streamline adoption and deployment of any existing or new regulation can be adopted and deployed across the appropriate parts of the enterprise.future regulations.
Gas Environmental Outlook: Consumers expects to incur response activity costs at a number of sites, including 23 former MGP sites. For additional details, see Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments—Consumers Gas Utility Contingencies—Gas Environmental Matters.
Greenhouse Gases: Consumers is making voluntary efforts to reduce its gas utility’s methane emissions. In October 2019, Consumers set a goal of net‑zero methane emissions from its natural gas delivery system by 2030. Under its Methane Reduction Plan, Consumers plans to reduce methane emissions from its system by about 80 percent by accelerating the replacement of aging pipe, rehabilitating or retiring outdated infrastructure, and adopting new technologies and practices. The remaining emissions will be eliminated by purchasing and/or producing renewable natural gas.


3839

Table of Contents


There is also increasing interest at the federal, state, and local levels involving potential regulation of greenhouse gases or its sources, which include methane emissions and carbon dioxide from Consumers’ gas utility. Such regulation, if adopted, may involve requirements to reduce methane and carbon dioxide emissions from natural gas use. No such measures apply to Consumers at this time. Consumers continues to monitor these initiatives and comment as appropriate. Consumers cannot predict the impact of any potential future legislation or regulation on its gas utility.
Consumers Electric Utility and Gas Utility Outlook and Uncertainties
Energy Waste Reduction Plan: The 2016 Energy Law authorized incentives for demand response programs and expanded existing incentives for energy efficiency programs, referring to the combined initiatives as energy waste reduction programs. The 2016 Energy Law:
extended the requirement to achieve annual reductions of 1.0 percent in customers’ electricity use through 2021 and 0.75 percent in customers’ natural gas use indefinitely
removed limits on investments under the program and provided for a higher return on those investments; together, these provisions effectively doubled the financial incentives Consumers may earn for exceeding the statutory targets
established a goal of 35 percent combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction by 2025
established a goal of 35 percent combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction by 2025; Consumers has achieved 22 percent of the combined renewable energy and energy waste reduction goal through 2019
Additionally, the MPSC has approved the recovery of demand response costs and an associated financial incentive based on demand response target performance.
Under its energy waste reduction plan, Consumers provides its customers with incentives to reduce usage by offering energy audits, rebates and discounts on purchases of highly efficient appliances, and other incentives and programs. The COVID‑19 pandemic may impact Consumers’ ability to execute energy efficiency programs effectively and, accordingly, could affect Consumers’ ability to exceed its statutory savings targets and earn the energy waste reduction incentive for 2020. Consumers cannot predict the ultimate financial impact of the pandemic on its 2020 energy waste reduction incentive.
COVID‑19 Costs Accounting Deferral: In April 2020, the MPSC issued an order authorizing Consumers to defer uncollectible accounts expense incurred beginning March 24, 2020 that are in excess of the amount used to set existing rates. The order also requests that interested parties submit comments by the end of April 2020 regarding utility accounting for COVID‑19-related expenses and COVID‑19-related impacts to regulatory activities.
Enterprises Outlook and Uncertainties
CMS Energy’s primary focus with respect to its enterprises businesses is to maximize the value of generating assets, its share of which represents 1,234 MW of capacity, and to pursue opportunities for the development of renewable generation projects.
The enterprises segment’s assets may be affected by environmental laws and regulations. The new ozone NAAQS will make it more difficult to construct or modify power plants and other emission sources in areas of the country that have not met the new ozone standard. In April 2018, the EPA designated certain areas of Michigan as not meeting the new standard with an August 2018 effective date. The enterprises segment’s DIG plant located in Dearborn, Michigan is in one such area and, as a result, would be subject to additional permitting restrictions in the event of any future modifications. For additional details regarding the new ozone NAAQS, see Consumers Electric Utility Outlook and Uncertainties—Electric Environmental Outlook.


40

Table of Contents


Trends, uncertainties, and other matters related to the enterprises segment that could have a material impact on CMS Energy’s consolidated income, cash flows, or financial position include:
investment in and financial benefits received from renewable energy and energy storage projects
changes in energy and capacity prices
severe weather events and climate change associated with increasing levels of greenhouse gases
changes in commodity prices and interest rates on certain derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting and must be marked to market through earnings
changes in various environmental laws, regulations, principles, or practices, or in their interpretation
the outcome of certain legal proceedings, including gas price reporting litigation
indemnity and environmental remediation obligations at Bay Harbor, including an inability to renew an NPDES permit in 2020
obligations related to a tax claim from the government of Equatorial Guinea
representations, warranties, and indemnities provided by CMS Energy in connection with previous sales of assets
For additional details regarding the enterprises segment’s uncertainties, see Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments.

EnerBank Outlook and Uncertainties

EnerBank is a Utah state-chartered, FDIC-insured industrial bank providing primarily unsecured, fixed-rate installment loans throughout the U.S. to finance home improvements. The carrying value of EnerBank’s loan portfolio was $2.4 billion at March 31, 2020. The 12‑month rolling average net default rate on loans held by EnerBank was 1.3 percent at March 31, 2020.
39

TableAs a result of Contents
the COVID‑19 pandemic, EnerBank has instituted new payment accommodations for current customers and has experienced slower lending growth, offset slightly by market share gains as a result of new customers shifting from competitors. EnerBank cannot predict the longer-term impacts of the pandemic, but could experience higher loan write-offs, increased loan modifications, and slower lending growth. EnerBank expects lending growth of up to five percent in 2020; lending growth could be higher if EnerBank continues to experience customers shifting from competitors. Over the long term, EnerBank expects lending growth to average nine percent annually over the next five years.

EnerBank’s loan portfolio was funded primarily by certificates of deposit of $2.4 billion at March 31, 2020. CMS Energy is required both by law and by contract to provide financial support, including infusing additional capital, to ensure that EnerBank satisfies mandated capital requirements and has sufficient liquidity to operate. With its self-funding plan, EnerBank has exceeded these requirements historically and exceeded them as of March 31, 2020. For additional details regarding EnerBank’s loan portfolio, see Note 7, Notes Receivable.
Other Outlook and Uncertainties
EnerBank:Employee Separation Program: EnerBank isIn December 2019, CMS Energy and Consumers announced a Utah state‑chartered, FDIC‑insured industrial bank providing primarily unsecured consumer installment loansvoluntary separation program for financing home improvements. EnerBank represented five percent of CMS Energy’s net assets at June 30, 2019 and seven percent of CMS Energy’s net income available to common stockholders fornon‑union employees. For the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019. The carrying value of EnerBank’s loan portfolio was $2.2 billion at June 30, 2019. Its loan portfolio was funded primarily by certificates of deposit of $2.1 billion. The 12‑month rolling average net default rate on loans held by EnerBank was 1.2 percent at June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020, CMS Energy is required bothand Consumers recorded an after-tax charge of $8 million related to the program, under which 140 employees accepted and were approved for early separation. As a result of the program, CMS Energy and Consumers expect to benefit from future cost savings, as employee staffing levels will be better matched to workload demand, which reflects the companies’ ongoing workforce productivity improvements.


41

Table of Contents


Union Contract: The present UWUA agreement for operating, maintenance, and construction employees expires in June 2020. Consumers has suspended in-person negotiations due to the COVID‑19 pandemic; however, Consumers executed an agreement with the UWUA to reach a tentative agreement within two weeks once the in-person restrictions are lifted. The tentative agreement would then need to be ratified by lawUWUA members. If a ratified tentative agreement cannot be reached with the UWUA by June 2020, the agreement provides for a one‑month extension to July 1, 2020 and by contracta three‑percent general pay increase effective June 1, 2020 to provide financial support, including infusing additional capital, to ensure that EnerBank satisfies mandated capital requirements and has sufficient liquidity to operate. With its self‑funding plan, EnerBank has exceeded these requirements historically and exceeded them as of June 30, 2019.the UWUA membership.
Litigation: CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain of their subsidiaries are named as parties in various litigation matters, as well as in administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies, arising in the ordinary course of business. For additional details regarding these and other legal matters, see Note 2, Regulatory Matters and Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments.
New Accounting Standards
For details regarding new accounting standards issued but not yet effective, see Note 1, New Accounting Standards.


4042

Table of Contents



(This page intentionally left blank)


4143

Table of Contents


CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
In Millions, Except Per Share AmountsIn Millions, Except Per Share Amounts In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Operating Revenue $1,445
 $1,492
 $3,504
 $3,445
 $1,864
 $2,059
            
Operating Expenses            
Fuel for electric generation 119
 115
 261
 247
 103
 142
Purchased and interchange power 356
 393
 734
 775
 357
 378
Purchased power – related parties 16
 19
 34
 38
 18
 18
Cost of gas sold 106
 112
 510
 493
 273
 404
Maintenance and other operating expenses 343
 326
 697
 636
 315
 354
Depreciation and amortization 216
 204
 514
 483
 316
 298
General taxes 71
 68
 177
 155
 114
 106
Total operating expenses 1,227
 1,237
 2,927
 2,827
 1,496
 1,700
            
Operating Income 218
 255
 577
 618
 368
 359
            
Other Income (Expense)            
Interest income 2
 4
 3
 6
 1
 1
Interest income – related parties 7
 
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 3
 1
 5
 2
 1
 2
Income from equity method investees 2
 4
 1
 7
Income (loss) from equity method investees 3
 (1)
Nonoperating retirement benefits, net 23
 22
 46
 46
 31
 23
Other income 2
 
 3
 1
 
 1
Other expense (5) (9) (8) (11) (4) (3)
Total other income 27
 22
 50
 51
 39
 23
            
Interest Charges            
Interest on long-term debt 110
 103
 216
 203
 116
 106
Interest expense – related parties 3
 
 3
 
 3
 
Other interest expense 19
 10
 35
 21
 19
 16
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1)
Total interest charges 131
 112
 252
 223
 137
 121
            
Income Before Income Taxes 114
 165
 375
 446
 270
 261
Income Tax Expense 20
 25
 68
 65
 27
 48
            
Net Income 94
 140
 307
 381
Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 1
 1
 1
 1
        
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $93
 $139
 $306
 $380
 $243
 $213
            
Basic Earnings Per Average Common Share $0.33
 $0.49
 $1.08
 $1.35
 $0.86
 $0.75
Diluted Earnings Per Average Common Share $0.33
 $0.49
 $1.08
 $1.35
 $0.85
 $0.75
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


4244

Table of Contents


CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
In Millions 
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Net Income $94
 $140
  $307
 $381
          
Retirement Benefits Liability         
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax of $- for all periods 1
 1
  2
 2
Amortization of prior service credit, net of tax of $- for all periods 
 (1)  (1) (1)
          
Investments         
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax of $- for all periods 
 
  
 (1)
          
Derivatives         
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax of $(1), $-, $(1), and $- (2) 
  (3) 
          
Other Comprehensive Loss (1) 
  (2) 
          
Comprehensive Income $93
 $140
  $305
 $381
          
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 1
 1
  1
 1
          
Comprehensive Income Attributable to CMS Energy $92
 $139
  $304
 $380
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


43

Table of Contents


(This page intentionally left blank)


44

Table of Contents

CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 302019 2018 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities    
Net income $307
 $381
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    
Depreciation and amortization 514
 483
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credit 60
 60
Other non-cash operating activities and reconciling adjustments 9
 22
Cash provided by (used in) changes in assets and liabilities    
Accounts and notes receivable and accrued revenue 190
 298
Inventories 98
 101
Accounts payable and accrued rate refunds (48) (41)
Other current and non-current assets and liabilities 55
 112
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,185
 1,416
     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities    
Capital expenditures (excludes assets placed under finance lease) (973) (872)
Increase in EnerBank notes receivable (170) (80)
Purchase of notes receivable by EnerBank (220) 
Cost to retire property and other investing activities (47) (56)
Net cash used in investing activities (1,410) (1,008)
     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities    
Proceeds from issuance of debt 1,455
 794
Retirement of debt (1,104) (660)
Increase in EnerBank certificates of deposit 371
 136
Decrease in notes payable (97) (170)
Issuance of common stock 6
 36
Payment of dividends on common and preferred stock (218) (204)
Payment of finance lease obligations and other financing costs (29) (43)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 384
 (111)
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts 159
 297
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, Beginning of Period 175
 204
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, End of Period $334
 $501
     
Other Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities    
Non-cash transactions    
Capital expenditures not paid $150
 $140
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Net Income $243
 $213
     
Retirement Benefits Liability    
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax of $- for both periods 1
 1
Amortization of prior service credit, net of tax of $- for both periods 
 (1)
     
Derivatives    
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax of $(1) and $- (4) (1)
     
Other Comprehensive Loss (3) (1)
     
Comprehensive Income $240
 $212
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


45

Table of Contents



(This page intentionally left blank)


46

Table of Contents


CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
ASSETS
In Millions 
 June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
 
Current Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $312
 $153
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 22
 21
Accounts receivable and accrued revenue, less allowance of $20 in both periods 749
 964
Notes receivable, less allowance of $28 in 2019 and $24 in 2018 249
 233
Assets held for sale 40
 
Accounts receivable – related parties 15
 14
Accrued gas revenue 10
 16
Inventories at average cost    
Gas in underground storage 353
 450
Materials and supplies 147
 143
Generating plant fuel stock 52
 57
Deferred property taxes 204
 279
Regulatory assets 18
 37
Prepayments and other current assets 83
 101
Total current assets 2,254
 2,468
     
Plant, Property, and Equipment    
Plant, property, and equipment, gross 24,263
 24,400
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 7,130
 7,037
Plant, property, and equipment, net 17,133
 17,363
Construction work in progress 973
 763
Total plant, property, and equipment 18,106
 18,126
     
Other Non-current Assets    
Regulatory assets 2,344
 1,743
Accounts and notes receivable 2,005
 1,645
Investments 64
 69
Other 519
 478
Total other non-current assets 4,932
 3,935
     
Total Assets $25,292
 $24,529


46

Table of Contents



LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
In Millions 
 June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
 
Current Liabilities    
Current portion of long-term debt, finance leases, and other financing $1,077
 $996
Notes payable 
 97
Accounts payable 627
 723
Accounts payable – related parties 9
 10
Accrued rate refunds 34
 4
Accrued interest 95
 94
Accrued taxes 295
 398
Regulatory liabilities 67
 155
Other current liabilities 182
 147
Total current liabilities 2,386
 2,624
     
Non-current Liabilities    
Long-term debt 11,236
 10,615
Non-current portion of finance leases and other financing 86
 69
Regulatory liabilities 3,786
 3,681
Postretirement benefits 443
 436
Asset retirement obligations 438
 432
Deferred investment tax credit 117
 99
Deferred income taxes 1,548
 1,487
Other non-current liabilities 364
 294
Total non-current liabilities 18,018
 17,113
     
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 3)
 


 


     
Equity    
Common stockholders’ equity 

 

Common stock, authorized 350.0 shares; outstanding 283.8 shares in 2019 and 283.4 shares in 2018 3
 3
Other paid-in capital 5,097
 5,088
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (67) (65)
Accumulated deficit (182) (271)
Total common stockholders’ equity 4,851
 4,755
Noncontrolling interests 37
 37
Total equity 4,888
 4,792
     
Total Liabilities and Equity $25,292
 $24,529
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities    
Net income $243
 $213
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    
Depreciation and amortization 316
 298
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits 67
 43
Pension contributions (531) 
Other non-cash operating activities and reconciling adjustments 9
 16
Cash provided by (used in) changes in assets and liabilities    
Accounts and notes receivable and accrued revenue (17) (61)
Inventories 171
 209
Accounts payable and accrued rate refunds (54) (89)
Other current and non-current assets and liabilities (3) (12)
Net cash provided by operating activities 201
 617
     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities    
Capital expenditures (excludes assets placed under finance lease) (523) (481)
Increase in EnerBank notes receivable (4) (46)
Purchase of notes receivable by EnerBank (8) (121)
Cost to retire property and other investing activities (24) (27)
Net cash used in investing activities (559) (675)
     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities    
Proceeds from issuance of debt 1,198
 993
Retirement of debt (2) (790)
Increase (decrease) in EnerBank certificates of deposit (7) 151
Decrease in notes payable (90) (67)
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs 101
 3
Payment of dividends on common stock (116) (108)
Other financing costs (22) (32)
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,062
 150
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts 704
 92
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, Beginning of Period 157
 175
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, End of Period $861
 $267
     
Other Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities    
Non-cash transactions    
Capital expenditures not paid $95
 $99
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


47

Table of Contents


CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in EquityBalance Sheets (Unaudited)
In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts 
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Total Equity at Beginning of Period $4,895
 $4,633
  $4,792
 $4,478
          
Common Stock         
At beginning and end of period 3
 3
  3
 3
          
Other Paid-in Capital         
At beginning of period 5,087
 5,037
  5,088
 5,019
Common stock issued 10
 39
  17
 47
Common stock repurchased 
 
  (8) (10)
Common stock reissued 
 
  
 20
At end of period 5,097
 5,076
  5,097
 5,076
          
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss         
At beginning of period (66) (61)  (65) (50)
Retirement benefits liability      

 

At beginning of period (63) (60)  (63) (50)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
  
 (11)
Amortization of net actuarial loss 1
 1
  2
 2
Amortization of prior service credit 
 (1)  (1) (1)
At end of period (62) (60)  (62) (60)
Investments         
At beginning of period 
 (1)  
 
Unrealized loss on investments 
 
  
 (1)
At end of period 
 (1)  
 (1)
Derivative instruments  
  
     
At beginning of period (3) 
  (2) 
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (2) 
  (3) 
At end of period (5) 
  (5) 
At end of period (67) (61)  (67) (61)
          
Accumulated Deficit         
At beginning of period (166) (383)  (271) (531)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
  
 8
Net income attributable to CMS Energy 93
 139
  306
 380
Dividends declared on common stock (109) (102)  (217) (203)
At end of period (182) (346)  (182) (346)
          
Noncontrolling Interests         
At beginning of period 37
 37
  37
 37
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests 1
 1
  1
 1
Distributions and other changes in noncontrolling interests (1) (1)  (1) (1)
At end of period 37
 37
  37
 37
          
Total Equity at End of Period $4,888
 $4,709
  $4,888
 $4,709
          
Dividends Declared Per Common Share $0.3825
 $0.3575
  $0.7650
 $0.7150
ASSETS
In Millions 
 March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
 
Current Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $834
 $140
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 27
 17
Accounts receivable and accrued revenue, less allowance of $22 in 2020 and $20 in 2019 884
 886
Notes receivable, less allowance of $33 in both periods 241
 223
Notes receivable held for sale 
 19
Accounts and notes receivable – related parties 25
 17
Accrued gas revenue 1
 
Inventories at average cost    
Gas in underground storage 225
 399
Materials and supplies 143
 140
Generating plant fuel stock 66
 66
Deferred property taxes 246
 305
Regulatory assets 24
 33
Prepayments and other current assets 101
 86
Total current assets 2,817
 2,331
     
Plant, Property, and Equipment    
Plant, property, and equipment, gross 25,675
 25,390
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 7,563
 7,360
Plant, property, and equipment, net 18,112
 18,030
Construction work in progress 1,032
 896
Total plant, property, and equipment 19,144
 18,926
     
Other Non-current Assets    
Regulatory assets 2,465
 2,489
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance of $66 in 2020 and $- in 2019 2,226
 2,281
Investments 72
 71
Other 723
 739
Total other non-current assets 5,486
 5,580
     
Total Assets $27,447
 $26,837


48

Table of Contents




LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
In Millions 
 March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
 
Current Liabilities    
Current portion of long-term debt, finance leases, and other financing $1,721
 $1,130
Notes payable 
 90
Accounts payable 490
 622
Accounts payable – related parties 7
 13
Accrued rate refunds 42
 35
Accrued interest 100
 104
Accrued taxes 330
 437
Regulatory liabilities 88
 87
Other current liabilities 162
 186
Total current liabilities 2,940
 2,704
     
Non-current Liabilities    
Long-term debt 12,545
 11,951
Non-current portion of finance leases and other financing 71
 76
Regulatory liabilities 3,807
 3,742
Postretirement benefits 141
 674
Asset retirement obligations 485
 477
Deferred investment tax credit 119
 120
Deferred income taxes 1,722
 1,655
Other non-current liabilities 395
 383
Total non-current liabilities 19,285
 19,078
     
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 3)
 


 


     
Equity    
Common stockholders’ equity 

 

Common stock, authorized 350.0 shares; outstanding 286.2 shares in 2020 and 283.9 shares in 2019 3
 3
Other paid-in capital 5,207
 5,113
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (76) (73)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) 51
 (25)
Total common stockholders’ equity 5,185
 5,018
Noncontrolling interests 37
 37
Total equity 5,222
 5,055
     
Total Liabilities and Equity $27,447
 $26,837
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


4849

Table of Contents
CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)


In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Total Equity at Beginning of Period $5,055
 $4,792
     
Common Stock    
At beginning and end of period 3
 3
     
Other Paid-in Capital    
At beginning of period 5,113
 5,088
Common stock issued 106
 7
Common stock repurchased (12) (8)
At end of period 5,207
 5,087
     
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss    
At beginning of period (73) (65)
Retirement benefits liability    
At beginning of period (69) (63)
Amortization of net actuarial loss 1
 1
Amortization of prior service credit 
 (1)
At end of period (68) (63)
Derivative instruments    
At beginning of period (4) (2)
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (4) (1)
At end of period (8) (3)
At end of period (76) (66)
     
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)    
At beginning of period (25) (271)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (51) 
Net income attributable to CMS Energy 243
 213
Dividends declared on common stock (116) (108)
At end of period 51
 (166)
     
Noncontrolling Interests    
At beginning and end of period 37
 37
     
Total Equity at End of Period $5,222
 $4,895
     
Dividends Declared Per Common Share $0.4075
 $0.3825
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


50

Table of Contents



(This page intentionally left blank)


4951

Table of Contents


Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Operating Revenue $1,334
 $1,395
 $3,277
 $3,250
 $1,744
 $1,943
            
Operating Expenses            
Fuel for electric generation 88
 86
 194
 188
 79
 106
Purchased and interchange power 350
 388
 724
 766
 347
 374
Purchased power – related parties 16
 19
 34
 39
 18
 18
Cost of gas sold 104
 108
 505
 485
 270
 401
Maintenance and other operating expenses 320
 298
 639
 580
 278
 319
Depreciation and amortization 212
 201
 506
 478
 312
 294
General taxes 69
 66
 172
 151
 111
 103
Total operating expenses 1,159
 1,166
 2,774
 2,687
 1,415
 1,615
            
Operating Income 175
 229
 503
 563
 329
 328
            
Other Income (Expense)            
Interest income 1
 2
 2
 4
 1
 1
Interest and dividend income – related parties 1
 
 2
 
 1
 1
Allowance for equity funds used during construction 3
 1
 5
 2
 1
 2
Nonoperating retirement benefits, net 22
 20
 43
 42
 29
 21
Other income 1
 
 2
 1
 
 1
Other expense (5) (3) (8) (5) (3) (3)
Total other income 23
 20
 46
 44
 29
 23
            
Interest Charges            
Interest on long-term debt 68
 67
 137
 134
 74
 69
Interest expense – related parties 3
 
 3
 
 3
 
Other interest expense 4
 4
 7
 9
 3
 3
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1)
Total interest charges 74
 70
 145
 142
 79
 71
            
Income Before Income Taxes 124
 179
 404
 465
 279
 280
Income Tax Expense 26
 27
  80
 71
 44
 54
             
Net Income 98
 152
 324
 394
Preferred Stock Dividends 1
 1
  1
 1
         
Net Income Available to Common Stockholder $97
 $151
 $323
 $393
 $235
 $226
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


5052

Table of Contents


Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
In Millions 
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Net Income $98
 $152
  $324
 $394
          
Retirement Benefits Liability    
     
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax of $- for all periods 1
 
  1
 1
          
Investments    
     
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax of $- for all periods 
 
  
 (1)
          
Other Comprehensive Income 1
 
  1
 
          
Comprehensive Income $99
 $152
  $325
 $394
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


51

Table of Contents


(This page intentionally left blank)


52

Table of Contents

Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30 2019
 2018
Cash Flows from Operating Activities  
  
Net income $324
 $394
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    
Depreciation and amortization 506
 478
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credit 41
 35
Other non-cash operating activities and reconciling adjustments 4
 15
Cash provided by (used in) changes in assets and liabilities    
Accounts and notes receivable and accrued revenue 187
 172
Inventories 96
 98
Accounts payable and accrued rate refunds (41) (34)
Other current and non-current assets and liabilities (7) (60)
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,110
 1,098
     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities  
  
Capital expenditures (excludes assets placed under finance lease) (963) (859)
Cost to retire property and other investing activities (63) (55)
Net cash used in investing activities (1,026) (914)
     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities  
  
Proceeds from issuance of debt 297
 544
Retirement of debt (528) (330)
Decrease in notes payable (97) (170)
Stockholder contribution 675
 250
Payment of dividends on common and preferred stock (273) (246)
Payment of finance lease obligations and other financing costs (2) (21)
Net cash provided by financing activities 72
 27
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts 156
 211
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, Beginning of Period 56
 65
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, End of Period $212
 $276
     
Other Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities  
  
Non-cash transactions  
  
Capital expenditures not paid $138
 $116
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Net Income $235
 $226
     
Retirement Benefits Liability    
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax of $1 and $- 
 
     
Other Comprehensive Income 
 
     
Comprehensive Income $235
 $226
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


53

Table of Contents



(This page intentionally left blank)


54

Table of Contents


Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
ASSETS
In Millions 
 June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
 
Current Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $196
 $39
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 16
 17
Accounts receivable and accrued revenue, less allowance of $20 in both periods 653
 855
Assets held for sale 40
 
Accounts and notes receivable – related parties 8
 15
Accrued gas revenue 10
 16
Inventories at average cost    
Gas in underground storage 353
 450
Materials and supplies 142
 137
Generating plant fuel stock 48
 52
Deferred property taxes 204
 279
Regulatory assets 18
 37
Prepayments and other current assets 71
 83
Total current assets 1,759
 1,980
     
Plant, Property, and Equipment    
Plant, property, and equipment, gross 23,833
 23,963
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 7,046
 6,958
Plant, property, and equipment, net 16,787
 17,005
Construction work in progress 960
 756
Total plant, property, and equipment 17,747
 17,761
     
Other Non-current Assets    
Regulatory assets 2,344
 1,743
Accounts receivable 29
 27
Accounts and notes receivable – related parties 103
 104
Other 434
 410
Total other non-current assets 2,910
 2,284
     
Total Assets $22,416
 $22,025


54

Table of Contents



LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
In Millions 
 June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
 
Current Liabilities    
Current portion of long-term debt, finance leases, and other financing $47
 $48
Notes payable 
 97
Accounts payable 595
 685
Accounts payable – related parties 16
 14
Accrued rate refunds 34
 4
Accrued interest 58
 59
Accrued taxes 298
 436
Regulatory liabilities 67
 155
Other current liabilities 142
 120
Total current liabilities 1,257
 1,618
     
Non-current Liabilities    
Long-term debt 6,546
 6,779
Non-current portion of finance leases and other financing 86
 69
Regulatory liabilities 3,786
 3,681
Postretirement benefits 400
 392
Asset retirement obligations 435
 428
Deferred investment tax credit 117
 99
Deferred income taxes 1,851
 1,809
Other non-current liabilities 291
 230
Total non-current liabilities 13,512
 13,487
     
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 3)
 


 


     
Equity    
Common stockholder’s equity    
Common stock, authorized 125.0 shares; outstanding 84.1 shares in both periods 841
 841
Other paid-in capital 5,374
 4,699
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (20) (21)
Retained earnings 1,415
 1,364
Total common stockholder’s equity 7,610
 6,883
Preferred stock 37
 37
Total equity 7,647
 6,920
     
Total Liabilities and Equity $22,416
 $22,025
In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 31 2020
 2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities    
Net income $235
 $226
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    
Depreciation and amortization 312
 294
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits 44
 17
Pension contributions (518) 
Other non-cash operating activities and reconciling adjustments 
 2
Cash provided by (used in) changes in assets and liabilities    
Accounts and notes receivable and accrued revenue 31
 (59)
Inventories 170
 204
Accounts payable and accrued rate refunds (54) (80)
Other current and non-current assets and liabilities 18
 15
Net cash provided by operating activities 238
 619
     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities    
Capital expenditures (excludes assets placed under finance lease) (520) (476)
Cost to retire property and other investing activities (22) (26)
Net cash used in investing activities (542) (502)
     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities    
Proceeds from issuance of debt 873
 
Retirement of debt 
 (215)
Decrease in notes payable (90) (67)
Stockholder contribution 350
 350
Payment of dividends on common stock (219) (172)
Other financing costs (10) (5)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 904
 (109)
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts 600
 8
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, Beginning of Period 28
 56
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Including Restricted Amounts, End of Period $628
 $64
     
Other Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities    
Non-cash transactions    
Capital expenditures not paid $85
 $85
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


55

Table of Contents


Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
ASSETS
In Millions 
 March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
 
Current Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $604
 $11
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 24
 17
Accounts receivable and accrued revenue, less allowance of $22 in 2020 and $20 in 2019 785
 827
Accounts and notes receivable – related parties 8
 9
Accrued gas revenue 1
 
Inventories at average cost    
Gas in underground storage 225
 399
Materials and supplies 137
 135
Generating plant fuel stock 64
 63
Deferred property taxes 246
 305
Regulatory assets 24
 33
Prepayments and other current assets 85
 73
Total current assets 2,203
 1,872
     
Plant, Property, and Equipment    
Plant, property, and equipment, gross 25,246
 24,963
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 7,471
 7,272
Plant, property, and equipment, net 17,775
 17,691
Construction work in progress 1,013
 879
Total plant, property, and equipment 18,788
 18,570
     
Other Non-current Assets    
Regulatory assets 2,465
 2,489
Accounts receivable 29
 29
Accounts and notes receivable – related parties 102
 102
Other 619
 637
Total other non-current assets 3,215
 3,257
     
Total Assets $24,206
 $23,699


56

Table of Contents




LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
In Millions 
 March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
 
Current Liabilities    
Current portion of long-term debt, finance leases, and other financing $521
 $221
Notes payable 
 90
Accounts payable 458
 593
Accounts payable – related parties 16
 20
Accrued rate refunds 42
 35
Accrued interest 78
 67
Accrued taxes 363
 481
Regulatory liabilities 88
 87
Other current liabilities 105
 118
Total current liabilities 1,671
 1,712
     
Non-current Liabilities    
Long-term debt 7,616
 7,048
Non-current portion of finance leases and other financing 71
 76
Regulatory liabilities 3,807
 3,742
Postretirement benefits 103
 622
Asset retirement obligations 482
 474
Deferred investment tax credit 119
 120
Deferred income taxes 1,923
 1,864
Other non-current liabilities 311
 304
Total non-current liabilities 14,432
 14,250
     
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 3)
 


 


     
Equity    
Common stockholder’s equity    
Common stock, authorized 125.0 shares; outstanding 84.1 shares in both periods 841
 841
Other paid-in capital 5,724
 5,374
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (28) (28)
Retained earnings 1,529
 1,513
Total common stockholder’s equity 8,066
 7,700
Cumulative preferred stock, $4.50 series 37
 37
Total equity 8,103
 7,737
     
Total Liabilities and Equity $24,206
 $23,699
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


57

Table of Contents


Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Total Equity at Beginning of Period $7,324
 $6,713
 $6,920
 $6,488
 $7,737
 $6,920
            
Common Stock    
        
At beginning and end of period 841
 841
 841
 841
 841
 841
            
Other Paid-in Capital            
At beginning of period 5,049
 4,549
 4,699
 4,449
 5,374
 4,699
Stockholder contribution 325
 150
 675
 250
 350
 350
At end of period 5,374
 4,699
 5,374
 4,699
 5,724
 5,049
            
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss  
  
        
At beginning of period (21) (29) (21) (12)
Retirement benefits liability            
At beginning of period (21) (28) (21) (24)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
 
 (5)
Amortization of net actuarial loss 1
 
 1
 1
At end of period (20) (28) (20) (28)
Investments  
  
    
At beginning of period 
 (1) 
 12
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
 
 (12)
Unrealized loss on investments 
 
 
 (1)
At end of period 
 (1) 
 (1)
At end of period (20) (29) (20) (29)
At beginning and end of period (28) (21)
At beginning and end of period (28) (21)
            
Retained Earnings  
  
        
At beginning of period 1,418
 1,315
 1,364
 1,173
 1,513
 1,364
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
 
 19
Net income 98
 152
 324
 394
 235
 226
Dividends declared on common stock (100) (126) (272) (245) (219) (172)
Dividends declared on preferred stock (1) (1) (1) (1)
At end of period 1,415
 1,340
 1,415
 1,340
 1,529
 1,418
            
Preferred Stock    
        
At beginning and end of period 37
 37
 37
 37
 37
 37
            
Total Equity at End of Period $7,647
 $6,888
 $7,647
 $6,888
 $8,103
 $7,324
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


5658

Table of Contents


CMS Energy Corporation
Consumers Energy Company
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CMS Energy and Consumers in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10‑Q and Article 10 of Regulation S‑X. As a result, CMS Energy and Consumers have condensed or omitted certain information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. CMS Energy and Consumers may have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the presentation in the present period and to reflect the implementation of new accounting standards. CMS Energy and Consumers are required to make estimates using assumptions that may affect reported amounts and disclosures; actual results could differ from these estimates. In management’s opinion, the unaudited information contained in this report reflects all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary to ensure that CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented are fairly stated. The notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the 20182019 Form 10‑K. Due to the seasonal nature of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ operations, the results presented for this interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be achieved for the fiscal year.
1:    New Accounting Standards
Implementation of New Accounting Standards
ASU 2016‑02, Leases: This standard, which was effective on January 1, 2019 for CMS Energy and Consumers, establishes a new accounting model for leases. The standard requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a term of more than one year, including operating leases, which were not recorded on the balance sheet under previous standards. The new guidance also amends the definition of a lease to require that a lessee have the right to control the use of a specified asset, and not simply control or take the output of the asset. On the statement of income, operating leases are generally accounted for under a straight-line expense model, while finance leases, which were previously referred to as capital leases, are generally accounted for under a financing model. Consistent with the previous lease guidance, however, the standard allows rate-regulated utilities to recognize expense consistent with the timing of recovery in rates.
CMS Energy and Consumers elected to use certain practical expedients permitted by the standard, under which they were not required to perform lease assessments or reassessments for agreements existing on the effective date. They also elected a transition method under which they initially applied the standard on January 1, 2019, without adjusting amounts presented for prior periods. Under the standard, CMS Energy and Consumers recognized additional lease assets and liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets as of January 1, 2019 for their operating leases. In addition, in accordance with the standard, they have provided additional disclosures about their leases in Note 8, Leases. The standard did not have any impact on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ consolidated net income or cash flows, and there was no cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings.
New Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective
ASU 2016‑13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments: This standard, which will bewas effective on January 1, 2020 for CMS Energy and Consumers, provides new guidance for estimatingmeasuring and


57

Table of Contents

recording recognizing credit losses on financial instruments. The standard will applyapplies to the recognition of loan lossesfinancial assets that are not measured at EnerBankfair value through net income as well as to the recognition of uncollectible accounts expense at Consumers. Entities willcertain off‑balance-sheet credit exposures. CMS Energy and Consumers were required to apply the standard using a modified retrospective approach, withunder which the initial impacts of the standard are recorded through a cumulative‑effect adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings on the effective date.
The standard required an increase to the allowance for loan losses at EnerBank. Prior to the standard, the allowance reflected expected credit losses over a 12‑month period, but the new guidance requires the allowance to reflect expected credit losses over the entire life of the loans. As a result, CMS Energy recorded a $65 million increase to its expected credit loss reserves on January 1, 2020, with the offsetting adjustment recorded to retained earnings, net of taxes of $14 million. The standard also requires an increase in the initial provision for loan losses recognized in net income for new loans originated in 2020 and beyond. The standard did not, however, have a material impact on net income during the three months ended March 31, 2020. For further information on EnerBank’s loans and the related allowance for loan losses, see Note 7, Notes Receivable. At Consumers, the standard applies to the allowance for uncollectible accounts, but did not result in any significant changes to the allowance methodology and did not have a material impact on Consumers’ consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting: This standard, which was effective as of March 12, 2020 for CMS Energy and Consumers, are evaluatingprovides optional guidance intended to ease the impactpotential burden in accounting for the expected discontinuation of LIBOR as a reference rate in the financial markets. The guidance can be applied to modifications made to certain contracts to replace LIBOR with a new reference rate. The guidance, if elected, will permit entities to


59

Table of Contents


treat such modifications as the continuation of the original contract, without any required accounting reassessments or remeasurements. The guidance will also facilitate the continuation of hedge accounting for derivatives that may have to be modified to incorporate a new rate. The guidance is effective through December 31, 2022. CMS Energy and Consumers presently have various contracts that reference LIBOR and they are assessing how this standard on their consolidated financial statements.may be applied to specific contract modifications.
2:    Regulatory Matters
Regulatory matters are critical to Consumers. The Michigan Attorney General, ABATE, the MPSC Staff, and certain other parties typically participate in MPSC proceedings concerning Consumers, such as Consumers’ rate cases and PSCR and GCR processes. These parties often challenge various aspects of those proceedings, including the prudence of Consumers’ policies and practices, and seek cost disallowances and other relief. The parties also have appealed significant MPSC orders. Depending upon the specific issues, the outcomes of rate cases and proceedings, including judicial proceedings challenging MPSC orders or other actions, could negatively affect CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. Consumers cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
There are multiple appeals pending that involve various issues concerning cost recovery from customers, the adequacy of the record of evidence supporting the recovery of Smart Energy investments, and other matters. Consumers is unable to predict the outcome of these appeals.
2017 Electric Rate Case:Voluntary Transmission Asset Sale Gain Share: In June 2018,September 2019, Consumers completed a sale of a portion of its electric utility’s substation transmission equipment to METC. In December 2019, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC issuedrequesting approval to share voluntarily half of the gain from the sale with customers; this application was approved by the MPSC in April 2020. The gain sharing will take place through an order authorizing an annual rate increase of $72offset to additional spending in 2020 or through a bill credit to customers in 2021. As a result, the $17 million based on a 10.0 percent authorized return on equity. In July 2018, Consumers filed a reconciliation of total revenues collected from rates it self‑implemented in October 2017gain to those that would have been collected under final rates. The reconciliation indicated that a $36 million refund would be required, whichshared with customers was recorded on Consumers’ consolidated balance sheets as a current regulatory liability at June 30, 2019.
2018 Electric Rate Case: In May 2018, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual rate increase of $58 million, based on a 10.75 percent authorized return on equity. The filing requested authority to recover new investment in system reliability, environmental compliance,March 31, 2020 and technology enhancements. In October 2018, Consumers reduced its requested annual rate increase to $44 million. In January 2019, the MPSC approved a settlement agreement authorizing an annual rate decrease of $24 million, based on a 10.0 percent authorized return on equity. With the elimination of the $113 million TCJA credit to customer bills, the approved settlement agreement resulted in an $89 million net increase in annual rates. The settlement agreement also provided for deferred accounting treatment for distribution‑related capital investments exceeding certain amounts. Consumers also agreed to not file a new electric rate case prior to January 2020.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: The TCJA, which changed existing federal tax law and included numerous provisions that affect businesses, was signed into law in December 2017.
In early 2018, the MPSC ordered Consumers to file various proceedings to determine the reduction in its electric and gas revenue requirements as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, and to implement bill credits to reflect that reduction until customer rates could be adjusted through Consumers’ general rate cases. Consumers filed, and the MPSC approved, such proceedings throughout 2018, resulting in credits to customer bills during 2018 to reflect reductions in Consumers’ electric and gas revenue requirements.
Consumers filed additional proceedings to address amounts collected from customers during 2018 prior to the implementation of bill credits. In late 2018, the MPSC approved the refund of $31��million to gas customers over six months beginning in December 2018 and the refund of $70 million to electric


58

Table of Contents

customers over six months beginning in January 2019. Consumers had a recorded current regulatory liability of $9 million for these approved refunds at June 30, 2019.
In October 2018, Consumers filed an application to address the December 31, 2017 remeasurement of its deferred income taxes and other base rate impacts of the TCJA on customers. In April 2019, Consumers filed rebuttal testimony and is now proposing approval to begin returning $0.4 billion of net regulatory tax liabilities through rates to be determined in Consumers’ pending gas rate case and $1.2 billion through a temporary bill credit until customer rates can be adjusted through an electric rate case. Consumers’ total $1.6 billion of net regulatory tax liabilities comprises:
A regulatory tax liability of $1.7 billion associated with plant assets that are subject to normalization, which is governed by the Internal Revenue Code. This requires that the regulatory tax liability be returned over the remaining book life of the related plant assets, the average of which is 44 years for gas plant assets and 27 years for electric plant assets.
A regulatory tax asset of $0.3 billion associated with plant assets that are not subject to normalization. Consumers proposed to collect this over 44 years from gas customers and over 27 years from electric customers.
A regulatory tax liability of $0.2 billion, which is primarily related to employee benefits. Consumers proposed to refund this amount to customers over ten years.
In January 2018, Consumers began to reduce the regulatory liability subject to normalization by crediting income tax expense. Consumers has fully reserved for the eventual refund of these excess deferred taxes that it has credited to income tax expense in a separate non‑current regulatory liability established by reducing revenue, and will continue to do so until these benefits are passed on to customers in accordance with an MPSC order, expected to be issued in 2019. At June 30, 2019, this reserve for refund of these excess deferred taxes totaled $53 million. For additional details on the remeasurement, see Note 10, Income Taxes.
Costs of Coal-Fueled Electric Generating Units to be Retired: In June 2019, the MPSC approved the settlement agreement reached in Consumers’ IRP, under which Consumers plans to retire the D.E. Karn 1 & 2 coal-fueled electric generating units in 2023. Under Michigan law, electric utilities have been permitted to use highly rated, low-cost securitization bonds to finance the recovery of qualified costs. Consumers will file for securitization financing by May 2023, requesting the MPSC’s approval to securitize qualified costs of $657 million, representing the remaining book value in 2023 of the two coal-fueled electric generating units upon their retirement. In June 2019, Consumers removed this amount from plant, property, and equipment and recorded it as a regulatory asset. Until securitization, the book value of the generating units will remain in rate base and receive full regulatory returns in general rate cases.
Energy Waste Reduction Plan Incentive: Consumers filedwill file its 20182019 waste reduction reconciliation in May 2019,2020, requesting the MPSC’s approval to collect from customers the maximum performance incentive of $34 million for exceeding its statutory savings targets in 2018.2019. Consumers recognized incentive revenue under this program of $34 million in 2018.2019.
3:    Contingencies and Commitments
CMS Energy and Consumers are involved in various matters that give rise to contingent liabilities. Depending on the specific issues, the resolution of these contingencies could negatively affect CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. In their disclosures of these matters, CMS Energy and Consumers provide an estimate of the possible loss or


59

Table of Contents

range of loss when such an estimate can be made. Disclosures that state that CMS Energy or Consumers cannot predict the outcome of a matter indicate that they are unable to estimate a possible loss or range of loss for the matter.
CMS Energy Contingencies
Gas Index Price Reporting Litigation: CMS Energy, along with CMS MST, CMS Field Services, Cantera Natural Gas, Inc., and Cantera Gas Company, were named as defendants in four4 class action lawsuits and one1 individual lawsuit arising as a result of alleged inaccurate natural gas price reporting to publications that report trade information. Allegations include price‑fixing conspiracies, restraint of trade, and artificial inflation of natural gas retail prices in Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin. In 2016,


60

Table of Contents


CMS Energy entities reached a settlement with the plaintiffs in the Kansas and Missouri class action cases for an amount that was not material to CMS Energy. In 2017, the federal district court approved the settlement. Plaintiffs are making claims for the following: treble damages, full consideration damages, exemplary damages, costs, interest, and/or attorneys’ fees.
After removal to federal court, all of the cases were transferred to a single federal district court pursuant to the multidistrict litigation process. In 2010 and 2011, all claims against CMS Energy defendants were dismissed by the district court based on FERC preemption.
In 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court decision. The appellate court found that FERC preemption does not apply under the facts of these cases. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s denial of leave to amend to add federal antitrust claims. The matter was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2015 upheld the Ninth Circuit’s decision. The cases were remanded back to the federal district court.
In 2016, the federal district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the individual lawsuit filed in Kansas based on a release in a prior settlement involving similar allegations; the order of summary judgment was subsequently appealed. In March 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the federal district court.
In 2017, the federal district court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in the two pending class action cases in Wisconsin. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and in August 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter back to the federal district court for further consideration.
In January 2019, the judge in the multidistrict litigation granted motions filed by plaintiffs for Suggestion of Remand of the actions back to the respective transferor courts in Wisconsin and Kansas for further handling. In the Kansas action, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the remand and the case is beinghas been transferred. In the Wisconsin actions, oppositions to the remand were filed, but the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted the remand in June 2019.
These cases involve complex facts,In 2019, CMS Energy and the plaintiffs in each of the Kansas and the Wisconsin actions engaged in settlement discussions and CMS Energy recorded a large number of similarly situated defendants$30 million liability at December 31, 2019 as the probable estimate to settle the 2 cases. The parties executed a settlement agreement in the Kansas case in February 2020, and that case is now complete. The parties executed a settlement agreement in the Wisconsin case, and a motion for preliminary approval was filed with different factual positions,the Federal District Court in March 2020. CMS Energy can give no assurances that the Wisconsin court will approve the settlement. In April 2020, the Wisconsin court issued a preliminary approval order. A fairness hearing will occur in August 2020. If settlement is not approved and multiple jurisdictions. Presently, any estimate of liability would be highly speculative; the amount of CMS Energy’s reasonably possible loss would be based on widely varying models previously untested in this context. If the outcome after appeals is unfavorable these casesto CMS Energy, the remaining Wisconsin case could negatively affect CMS Energy’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
Bay Harbor: CMS Land retained environmental remediation obligations for the collection and treatment of leachate a liquid consisting of water and other substances, at Bay Harbor after selling its interests in the development in 2002. Leachate is produced when water enters into cement kiln dust piles left over from former cement plant operations at the site. In 2012, CMS Land and EGLE finalized an agreement


60

Table of Contents

that established the final remedies and the future water quality criteria at the site. CMS Land completed all construction necessary to implement the remedies required by the agreement and will continue to maintain and operate a system to discharge treated leachate into Little Traverse Bay under an NPDES permit, issued in 2010 and renewed in 2016. The renewed NPDES permitwhich is valid through September 2020. CMS Land submitted a renewal request for the permit in April 2020.


61

Table of Contents


At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, CMS Energy had a recorded liability of $45$46 million for its remaining obligations for environmental remediation. CMS Energy calculated this liability based on discounted projected costs, using a discount rate of 4.34 percent and an inflation rate of one1 percent on annual operating and maintenance costs. The undiscounted amount of the remaining obligation is $56$57 million. CMS Energy expects to pay the following amounts for long‑term liquidleachate disposal and operating and maintenance costs during the remainder of 20192020 and in each of the next five years:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 
CMS Energy                        
Long‑term liquid disposal and operating and maintenance costs $2
 $4
 $4
 $4
 $4
 $4
Long‑term leachate disposal and operating and maintenance costs $4
 $4
 $4
 $4
 $4
 $4

CMS Energy’s estimate of response activity costs and the timing of expenditures could change if there are changes in circumstances or assumptions used in calculating the liability. Although a liability for its present estimate of remaining response activity costs has been recorded, CMS Energy cannot predict the ultimate financial impact or outcome of this matter.
Equatorial Guinea Tax Claim: In 2002, CMS Energy sold its oil, gas, and methanol investments in Equatorial Guinea. The government of Equatorial Guinea claims that, in connection with the sale, CMS Energy owes $152 million in taxes, plus substantial penalties and interest that could be up to or exceed the amount of the taxes claimed. In 2015, the matter was proceeding to formal arbitration; however, since then, the government of Equatorial Guinea has stopped communicating. CMS Energy has concluded that the government’s tax claim is without merit and will continue to contest the claim, but cannot predict the financial impact or outcome of the matter. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
Consumers Electric Utility Contingencies
Electric Environmental Matters: Consumers’ operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations. Historically, Consumers has generally been able to recover, in customer rates, the costs to operate its facilities in compliance with these laws and regulations.
Cleanup and Solid Waste: Consumers expects to incur remediation and other response activity costs at a number of sites under the NREPA. Consumers believes that these costs should be recoverable in rates, but cannot guarantee that outcome. Consumers estimates that its liability for NREPA sites for which it can estimate a range of loss will be between $3 million and $4 million. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had a recorded liability of $3 million, the minimum amount in the range of its estimated probable NREPA liability, as no amount in the range was considered a better estimate than any other amount.
Consumers is a potentially responsible party at a number of contaminated sites administered under CERCLA. CERCLA liability is joint and several. In 2010, Consumers received official notification from the EPA that identified Consumers as a potentially responsible party for cleanup of PCBs at the Kalamazoo River CERCLA site. The notification claimed that the EPA has reason to believe that Consumers disposed of PCBs and arranged for the disposal and treatment of PCB‑containing materials at portions of the site. In 2011, Consumers received a follow‑up letter from the EPA requesting that


61

Table of Contents

Consumers agree to participate in a removal action plan along with several other companies for an area of lower Portage Creek, which is connected to the Kalamazoo River. All parties, including Consumers, that were asked to participate in the removal action plan declined to accept liability. Until further information is received from the EPA, Consumers is unable to estimate a range of potential liability for cleanup of the river.


62

Table of Contents


Based on its experience, Consumers estimates that its share of the total liability for known CERCLA sites will be between $3 million and $8 million. Various factors, including the number and creditworthiness of potentially responsible parties involved with each site, affect Consumers’ share of the total liability. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had a recorded liability of $3 million for its share of the total liability at these sites, the minimum amount in the range of its estimated probable CERCLA liability, as no amount in the range was considered a better estimate than any other amount.
The timing of payments related to Consumers’ remediation and other response activities at its CERCLA and NREPA sites is uncertain. Consumers periodically reviews these cost estimates. A change in the underlying assumptions, such as an increase in the number of sites, different remediation techniques, the nature and extent of contamination, and legal and regulatory requirements, could affect its estimates of NREPA and CERCLA liability.
Ludington PCB: In 1998, during routine maintenance activities, Consumers identified PCB as a component in certain paint, grout, and sealant materials at Ludington.the Ludington pumped-storage plant. Consumers removed part of the PCB material and replaced it with non‑PCB material. Consumers has had several communications with the EPA regarding this matter, but cannot predict the financial impact or outcome.
MCV PPA: In December 2017, the MCV Partnership initiated arbitration against Consumers, asserting a breach of contract associated with the MCV PPA. Under this PPA, Consumers pays the MCV Partnership a fixed energy charge based on Consumers’ annual average baseload coal generating plant operating and maintenance cost, fuel inventory, and administrative and general expenses. The MCV Partnership asserts that, under the Clean Air Act, Consumers should have installed pollution control equipment on coal‑fueled electric generating units years before they were retired. The MCV Partnership also asserts that Consumers should have installed pollution control equipment earlier on its remaining coal‑fueled electric generating units. Additionally, the MCV Partnership claims that Consumers improperly characterized certain costs included in the calculation of the fixed energy charge.
In January 2019, an arbitration panel issued an order concluding that the MCV Partnership is not entitled to any damages associated with its claim against Consumers related to the Clean Air Act; the majority of the MCV Partnership’s claim, which estimated damages and interest in excess of $270 million, was related to this dismissed claim. Consumers believes that the MCV Partnership’s remaining claims are without merit, but cannot predict the financial impact or outcome of the matter.
Underwater Cables in Straits of Mackinac: Consumers owns certain underwater electric cables in the Straits of Mackinac, which were de‑energized and retired in 1990. Consumers was notified that some of these cables were damaged as a result of vessel activity in April 2018. Following the notification, Consumers located, inspected, sampled, capped, and returned the damaged retired cables to their original location on the lake bottom, and did not find any substantive evidence of environmental contamination. Consumers isAfter collaborating with the State of Michigan, local Native American tribes, and other stakeholders, to evaluateConsumers submitted a permit application and removal work plan with EGLE and the statusU.S. Army Corps of Engineers in December 2019 for partial removal of all Consumers-owned cables. In March 2020, EGLE issued a permit for the cablesremoval work and, to determine if any additional action is advisable.as a result, Consumers cannot predictrecorded an ARO liability of $5 million for the outcome of this matter, but if Consumers is requiredcost to remove allpartially its cables. Consumers recovers the cables, it could incur additional costscost of up to $10 million. Consumers has filed suit against the companies that own the vessels that allegedly caused the damage. Consumers will seek recovery from customers of any costs incurred.recorded AROs through MPSC-approved depreciation rates.


62

Table of Contents

Consumers Gas Utility Contingencies
Gas Environmental Matters: Consumers expects to incur remediation and other response activity costs at a number of sites under the NREPA. These sites include 23 former MGP facilities. Consumers operated


63

Table of Contents


the facilities on these sites for some part of their operating lives. For some of these sites, Consumers has no present ownership interest or may own only a portion of the original site.
At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had a recorded liability of $68$67 million for its remaining obligations for these sites. This amount represents the present value of long‑term projected costs, using a discount rate of 2.57 percent and an inflation rate of 2.5 percent. The undiscounted amount of the remaining obligation is $74$72 million. Consumers expects to pay the following amounts for remediation and other response activity costs during the remainder of 20192020 and in each of the next five years:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 
Consumers                        
Remediation and other response activity costs $8
 $16
 $21
 $7
 $2
 $2
 $12
 $8
 $20
 $11
 $2
 $2

Consumers periodically reviews these cost estimates. Any significant change in the underlying assumptions, such as an increase in the number of sites, changes in remediation techniques, or legal and regulatory requirements, could affect Consumers’ estimates of annual response activity costs and the MGP liability.
Pursuant to orders issued by the MPSC, Consumers defers its MGP‑related remediation costs and recovers them from its customers over a ten‑year period. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had a regulatory asset of $129$128 million related to the MGP sites.
Consumers estimates that its liability to perform remediation and other response activities at NREPA sites other than the MGP sites could reach $3 million. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had a recorded liability of less than $1 million, the minimum amount in the range of its estimated probable liability, as no amount in the range was considered a better estimate than any other amount.
Ray Compressor Station: On January 30, 2019, Consumers experienced a fire at the Ray Compressor Station, which resulted in the Ray Storage Field being off‑line or operating at significantly reduced capacity, which negatively affected Consumers’ natural gas supply and delivery capacity. This incident, which occurred during the extreme polar vortex weather condition, required Consumers to request voluntary reductions in customer load, to implement contingency gas supply purchases, and to implement a curtailment of natural gas deliveries for industrial and large commercial customers pursuant to Consumers’ MPSC curtailment tariff. The curtailment and request for voluntary reductions of customer loads were canceled as of midnight, February 1, 2019. Consumers investigated the cause of the incident, and filed a report on the incident with the MPSC in April 2019. In response, the MPSC issued an order in July 2019, directing Consumers to file additional reports regarding the incident and to include detail of the resulting costs in a future rate proceeding. The compressor station is presently operating at full capacity.
As a result of the fire and the resulting curtailment, Consumers could be subject to various claims from impacted customers or claims for damages. Consumers may also be subject to regulatory penalties and disallowances of gas purchased gas lost, and costs associated with the repairs to the Ray Compressor Station. Consumers’ incremental cost of gas purchased during the incident was $7 million. Additionally, at March 31, 2020, Consumers had incurred capital expenditures of $12 million to restore the compressor station. Consumers may also be subject to various claims from impacted customers, claims for damages, or regulatory penalties. At this time, Consumers cannot predict the outcome of these matters or other gas-related incidents and a reasonable estimate of anya total loss cannot be made, but they could have a material adverse effect on Consumers’ results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity, and could subject Consumers’ gas utility to increased regulatory scrutiny.


6364

Table of Contents


Consumers Electric and Gas Utility Contingencies
Electric and Gas Staking: In June 2019, the MPSC ordered Consumers to show cause as to why it should not be found in violation of the MISS DIG Act. The MPSC alleges that Consumers violated the law by failing to respond in a timely manner to over 20,000 requests to mark the location of underground facilities in April and May 2019 and only partially responding to others. The law provides the MPSC with discretion in setting fines for violations, if any; however, the fines cannot exceed $5,000 per violation. An order by the MPSC in this proceeding is not expected until mid-2020. Consumers has resolved the backlog of staking requests. Consumers cannot predict the outcome of this matter, but it could be subject to regulatory penalties that have a material adverse effect on Consumers’ results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity, and Consumers could be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny.
Guarantees
Presented in the following table are CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ guarantees at June 30, 2019:March 31, 2020:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Guarantee DescriptionIssue DateExpiration DateMaximum Obligation Carrying Amount Issue DateExpiration DateMaximum Obligation Carrying Amount 
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
Indemnity obligations from stock and asset sale agreements1
 various indefinite $153
 $2
Guarantees2
 various indefinite 36
 
Indemnity obligations from stock and asset sale agreements¹variousindefinite $153
 $2
Guarantee²July 2011indefinite 30
 
Consumers        
Guarantee2
 July 2011 indefinite $30
 $
Guarantee²July 2011indefinite $30
 $
1 
These obligations arose from stock and asset sale agreements under which CMS Energy or a subsidiary of CMS Energy indemnified the purchaser for losses resulting from various matters, primarily claims related to taxes. The maximum obligation amount is mostly related to the Equatorial Guinea tax claim discussed in the CMS Energy Contingencies section of this Note. CMS Energy believes the likelihood of material loss to be remote for the indemnity obligations not recorded as liabilities.
2 
At Consumers, thisThis obligation comprises a guarantee provided by Consumers to the U.S. Department of Energy in connection with a settlement agreement regarding damages resulting from the department’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants formerly owned by Consumers. At CMS Energy, the guarantee obligations comprise Consumers’ guarantee to the U.S. Department of Energy and CMS Energy’s 1994 guarantee of non‑recourse revenue bonds issued by Genesee.
Additionally, in the normal course of business, CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain other subsidiaries of CMS Energy have entered into various agreements containing tax and other indemnity provisions for which they are unable to estimate the maximum potential obligation. The carrying value of these indemnity obligations is $1 million. CMS Energy and Consumers consider the likelihood that they would be required to perform or incur substantial losses related to these indemnities to be remote.
Other Contingencies
In addition to the matters disclosed in this Note and Note 2, Regulatory Matters, there are certain other lawsuits and administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies, as well as unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, arising in the ordinary course of business to which CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain other subsidiaries of CMS Energy are parties. These other lawsuits, proceedings, and unasserted claims may involve personal injury, property damage, contracts, environmental matters, federal and state taxes, rates, licensing, employment, and other matters. Further,


64

Table of Contents

CMS Energy and Consumers occasionally self‑report certain regulatory non‑compliance matters that may or may not eventually result in administrative proceedings. CMS Energy and Consumers believe that the outcome of any one of these proceedings and potential claims will not have a material negative effect on their consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.


65

Table of Contents


4:    Financings and Capitalization
Financings: Presented in the following table is a summary of major long‑term debt transactionsissuances during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019:March 31, 2020:
 Principal (In Millions) Interest Rate
Issuance DateMaturity Date
CMS Energy, parent only     
Term loan facility¹ $300
variable
FebruaryFebruary 2021
Total CMS Energy, parent only $300
   
Consumers     
Term loan facility² $300
variable
JanuaryJanuary 2021
First mortgage bonds 575
3.50%MarchAugust 2051
Total Consumers $875
   
Total CMS Energy $1,175
   
 Principal
 (In Millions)
 Interest Rate
Issue/Retirement
Date
Maturity Date
Debt issuances     
CMS Energy, parent only     
Term loan facility $300
variable
January 2019December 2019
Junior subordinated notes1

630
5.875%February 2019March 2079
Term loan facility2
 165
variable
June 2019June 2020
Total CMS Energy, parent only $1,095
   
Consumers     
First mortgage bonds $300
3.750%May 2019February 2050
Total Consumers $300
   
Total CMS Energy $1,395
   
Debt retirements     
CMS Energy, parent only     
Term loan facility $300
variable
February 2019December 2019
Term loan facility 180
variable
February 2019April 2019
Total CMS Energy, parent only $480
   
Consumers     
First mortgage bonds 
 $300
5.650%May 2019April 2020
Total Consumers $300
   
Total CMS Energy $780
   

1 
These unsecured obligations rank subordinate and junior in rightAt March 31, 2020, the interest rate on the balance of payment to allthis term loan facility was 1.572 percent, based on an interest rate of CMS Energy’s existing and future senior indebtedness.six‑month LIBOR plus 0.500 percent.
2 
Outstanding borrowings bearAt March 31, 2020, the interest atrate on the balance of this term loan facility was 1.466 percent, based on an annualinterest rate of one‑month LIBOR plus 0.500 percent (2.845 percent at June 30, 2019).
0.450 percent.


65

TableRedemption of Contentsfirst mortgage bonds:

In April 2020, Consumers redeemed $100 million of 3.770 percent first mortgage bonds due in October 2020.
Revolving Credit Facilities: The following revolving credit facilities with banks were available at June 30, 2019:March 31, 2020:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Expiration DateAmount of Facility Amount Borrowed Letters of Credit Outstanding Amount Available Amount of Facility Amount Borrowed Letters of Credit Outstanding Amount Available 
CMS Energy, parent only                
June 5, 2023¹
 $550
 $25
 $4
 $521
CMS Enterprises, including subsidiaries        
September 30, 2025² $18
 $
 $8
 $10
Consumers³        
June 5, 2023 $550
 $
 $2
 $548
 $850
 $
 $7
 $843
CMS Enterprises, including subsidiaries
        
September 30, 20251
 $18
 $
 $8
 $10
Consumers2
        
June 5, 2023 $850
 $
 $7
 $843
November 23, 2020 250
 
 15
 235
September 9, 20193
 30
 
 30
 
November 19, 2021 250
 
 8
 242
April 18, 2022 30
 
 30
 

1
The weighted-average interest rate for outstanding borrowings under CMS Energy’s revolving credit facility was 1.887 percent at March 31, 2020.
2 
Under this facility, $8 million is available solely for the purpose of issuing letters of credit. Obligations under this facility are secured by the collateral accounts with the lending bank.
23 
Obligations under these facilities are secured by first mortgage bonds of Consumers.
In July 2019, Consumers amended this revolving credit facility by extending the expiration date to April 2022.
Short‑term Borrowings: Under Consumers’ commercial paper program, Consumers may issue, in one or more placements, investment-grade commercial paper notes with maturities of up to 365 days and that bearat market interest at fixed or floating rates. These issuances are supported by Consumers’ revolving credit facilities and may have an aggregate principal amount outstanding of up to $500 million. While the amount of outstanding commercial paper does not reduce the available capacity of the revolving credit facilities, Consumers does not intend to issue commercial paper in an amount exceeding the available capacity of the facilities. At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, there were no0 commercial paper notes outstanding under this program.
Dividend Restrictions: At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, payment of dividends by CMS Energy on its common stock was limited to $4.9$5.2 billion under provisions of the Michigan Business Corporation Act of 1972.
Under the provisions of its articles of incorporation, at June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers had $1.3$1.5 billion of unrestricted retained earnings available to pay dividends on its common stock to CMS Energy. Provisions of the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act appear to restrict dividends payable by Consumers to the amount of Consumers’ retained earnings. Several decisions from FERC suggest that, under a variety of circumstances, dividends from Consumers on its common stock would not be limited to amounts in Consumers’ retained earnings. Any decision by Consumers to pay dividends on its common stock in excess of retained earnings would be based on specific facts and circumstances and would be subject to a formal regulatory filing process.
For the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, Consumers paid $272$219 million in dividends on its common stock to CMS Energy.


66

Table of Contents

Issuance of Common Stock: In 2018, CMS Energy entered into an equity offering program under which it may sell, from time to time, shares of CMS Energy common stock having an aggregate sales price of up to $250 million. Under this program, CMS Energy may sell its common stock in privately negotiated transactions, in “at the market” offerings, through forward sales transactions or otherwise.
During 2018 and 2019, CMS Energy has entered into forward sales contracts having an aggregate sales price of $250 million. In March 2020, CMS Energy settled one of these contracts by issuing 2,017,783 shares of common stock for $47.95 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $97 million.
At March 31, 2020, CMS Energy’s remaining forward sales contracts had an aggregate sales price of $150 million. Presented in the following table are details of these contracts:
Contract DateMaturity DateNumber of Shares
Initial Forward Price Per Share Maturity DateNumber of Shares
Initial Forward Price Per Share 
November 16, 2018May 16, 20202,017,783
 $49.06
November 20, 2018May 20, 2020777,899
 50.91
March 31, 2021777,899
 $50.91
February 21, 2019August 21, 20202,083,340
 52.27
March 31, 20212,083,340
 52.27

These contracts allow CMS Energy to either physically settle the contracts by issuing shares of its common stock at the then‑applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement or net settle the contracts through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. CMS Energy may settle the contracts at any time through their maturity dates, and presently intends to physically settle the contracts by delivering shares of its common stock.
The initial forward price in the forward equity sale contracts includes a deduction for commissions and will be adjusted on a daily basis over the term based on an interest rate factor and decreased on certain dates by certain predetermined amounts to reflect expected dividend payments.
No amounts have or will beare recorded on CMS Energy’s consolidated balance sheets until settlements of the forward equity sale contracts occur. If CMS Energy had elected to net share settle the contracts as of June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, CMS Energy would have been required to deliver 621,923379,776 shares.


67

Table of Contents


5:    Fair Value Measurements
Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When measuring fair value, CMS Energy and Consumers are required to incorporate all assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. A fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measure fair value according to their observability in the market. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 inputs are observable, market‑based inputs, other than Level 1 prices. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in inactive markets, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect CMS Energy’s or Consumers’ own assumptions about how market participants would value their assets and liabilities.
CMS Energy and Consumers classify fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.


67

Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Presented in the following table are CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
CMS Energy, including Consumers ConsumersCMS Energy, including Consumers Consumers
June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
  June 30
2019
 December 31
2018
 March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
  March 31
2020
 December 31
2019
 
Assets1
        
Assets¹        
Cash equivalents $18
 $27
 $
 $
 $91
 $
 $
 $
Restricted cash equivalents 22
 21
 16
 17
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 27
 17
 24
 17
CMS Energy common stock 
 
 1
 1
 
 
 1
 1
Nonqualified deferred compensation plan assets 16
 14
 12
 10
 17
 18
 13
 14
DB SERP cash equivalents 
 1
 
 
Derivative instruments 2
 1
 2
 1
 
 1
 
 1
Total $58
 $64
 $31
 $29
 $135
 $36
 $38
 $33
Liabilities1
        
Liabilities¹        
Nonqualified deferred compensation plan liabilities $16
 $14
 $12
 $10
 $17
 $18
 $13
 $14
Derivative instruments 11
 3
 1
 
 19
 8
 
 
Total $27
 $17
 $13
 $10
 $36
 $26
 $13
 $14
1 
All assets and liabilities were classified as Level 1 with the exception of derivative contracts, which were classified as Level 2 or Level 3.
Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents consist of money market funds with daily liquidity. For further details, see Note 12, Cash and Cash Equivalents.


68

Table of Contents


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Assets and Liabilities: The nonqualified deferred compensation plan assets consist of mutual funds, which are valued using the daily quoted net asset values. CMS Energy and Consumers value their nonqualified deferred compensation plan liabilities based on the fair values of the plan assets, as they reflect the amount owed to the plan participants in accordance with their investment elections. CMS Energy and Consumers report the assets in other non‑current assets and the liabilities in other non‑current liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets.
DB SERP Cash Equivalents: The DB SERP cash equivalents consist of a money market fund with daily liquidity and are reported in other non‑current assets on CMS Energy and Consumers’ consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative Instruments: CMS Energy and Consumers value their derivative instruments using either a market approach that incorporates information from market transactions, or an income approach that discounts future expected cash flows to a present value amount. CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ derivatives are classified as Level 2 or Level 3.
The derivatives classified as Level 2 are interest rate swaps at CMS Energy, which are valued using market‑based inputs. CMS Energy uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk on certain long‑term debt obligations and certain notes receivable at EnerBank.


68

TableA subsidiary of Contents

CertainCMS Enterprises uses floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations associated with future interest payments on certain long‑term variable-rate debt. The interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges of the future variability of interest payments on debt with a notional amount of $9590 million at June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. Gains or losses on these swaps are initially reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and then, as interest payments are made on the hedged debt, are recognized in earnings within other interest expense on CMS Energy’s consolidated statements of income. CMS EnergyThe amount of losses recorded in other comprehensive income a $3(loss) was $5 million loss for the three months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and a $4$1 million loss for the sixthree months ended June 30,March 31, 2019. There were no material impacts on other interest expense associated with these swaps forduring the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.periods presented. The fair value of these swaps recorded in other liabilities on CMS Energy’s consolidated balance sheets totaled $6$10 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $3$5 million at December 31, 2018.2019. CMS Energy also has other interest rate swaps that economically hedge interest rate risk on debt, but that do not qualify for cash flow hedge accounting; the amounts associated with these swaps were not material.material for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
EnerBank uses fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk exposure associated with changes in the fair value of certain long‑term fixed-rate loans. The interest rate swaps at EnerBank qualify as fair value hedges of long‑term, fixed‑ratefixed-rate notes receivable with a notional amount of $61134 million at June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The fair value of these interest rate swaps recorded in other liabilities was $7 million at March 31, 2020 and $1 million at June 30,December 31, 2019. CMS Energy is adjusting the carrying value of the hedged notes receivable for the change in their fair value due to the hedged risk. Both gains and losses on the swaps and the changes to the carrying value of the hedged notes receivable are recorded within operating revenue on CMS Energy’s consolidated statements of income. There were no material amounts recognized inThe net impact of these hedges on operating revenue associated with these swapswas not material for the three months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and six months ended June 30, 2019.
The majority of derivatives classified as Level 3 are FTRs held by Consumers. Consumers uses FTRs to manage price risk related to electricity transmission congestion. An FTR is a financial instrument that entitles its holder to receive compensation or requires its holder to remit payment for congestion‑related transmission charges. Due to the lack of quoted pricing information, Consumers determines the fair value of its FTRs based on Consumers’ average historical settlements. There was no material activity within the Level 3 categories of assets and liabilities during the periods presented.


69

Table of Contents


6:    Financial Instruments
Presented in the following table are the carrying amounts and fair values, by level within the fair value hierarchy, of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value. The table excludes cash, cash equivalents, short‑term financial instruments, and trade accounts receivable and payable whose carrying amounts approximate their fair values. For information about assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for additional details regarding the fair value hierarchy, see Note 5, Fair Value Measurements.
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
  Fair Value  Fair Value  Fair Value  Fair Value
Carrying   Level Carrying   LevelCarrying   Level Carrying   Level
Amount Total  1 2 3  Amount Total  1 2 3 Amount Total 1 2 3  Amount Total 1 2 3 
CMS Energy, including ConsumersCMS Energy, including Consumers              CMS Energy, including Consumers              
Assets                                        
Long‑term receivables1
 $20
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
 $22
 $22
 $
 $
 $22
Long-term receivables1
 $19
 $19
 $
 $
 $19
 $20
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
Notes receivable2
 2,231
 2,359
 
 
 2,359
 1,857
 1,967
 
 
 1,967
 2,444
 2,721
 
 
 2,721
 2,500
 2,652
 
 
 2,652
Securities held to maturity 26
 26
 
 26
 
 22
 21
 
 21
 
 28
 28
 
 28
 
 26
 26
 
 26
 
Liabilities                                        
Long-term debt3
 12,292
 13,112
 1,177
 10,053
 1,882
 11,589
 11,630
 459
 9,404
 1,767
 14,247
 15,353
 1,113
 12,269
 1,971
 13,062
 14,185
 1,197
 11,048
 1,940
Long-term payables4
 28
 29
 
 
 29
 27
 27
 
 
 27
 31
 30
 
 
 30
 30
 32
 
 
 32
Consumers                                        
Assets                                        
Long‑term receivables1
 $20
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
 $22
 $22
 $
 $
 $22
Long-term receivables1
 $19
 $19
 $
 $
 $19
 $20
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
Notes receivable – related party5
 105
 105
 
 
 105
 106
 106
 
 
 106
 103
 103
 
 
 103
 103
 103
 
 
 103
Liabilities                                        
Long‑term debt6
 6,572
 7,102
 
 5,220
 1,882
 6,805
 6,833
 
 5,066
 1,767
Long-term debt6
 8,118
 8,939
 
 6,968
 1,971
 7,250
 8,010
 
 6,070
 1,940
1 
Includes current portion of long-term accounts receivable of $14$13 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.
2 
Includes current portion of notes receivable of $249$241 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $233$242 million at December 31, 2018.2019. For further details, see Note 7, Notes Receivable.
3 
Includes current portion of long‑term debt of $1.1$1.7 billion at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $1.0$1.1 billion at December 31, 2018.2019.
4 
Includes current portion of long‑term payables of $3 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $1 million at December 31, 2018.2019.


70

Table of Contents


5 
Includes current portion of notes receivablerelated party of $7 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019. For further details, see Note 7, Notes Receivable.
6 
Includes current portion of long‑term debt of $26$502 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $202 million at December 31, 2018.2019.
The effects of third‑party credit enhancements were excluded from the fair value measurements of long‑term debt. The principal amount of CMS Energy’s long‑term debt supported by third‑party credit enhancements was $35 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019. The entirety of these amounts was at Consumers.
Debt securities classified as held to maturity consisted primarily of mortgage‑backed securities and Utah Housing Corporation bonds held by EnerBank. Presented in the following table are these investment securities:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Cost 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
  Cost 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 Cost 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
  Cost 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
CMS Energy                                
Debt securities $26
 $
 $
 $26
 $22
 $
 $1
 $21
 $28
 $
 $
 $28
 $26
 $
 $
 $26

7:    Notes Receivable
Presented in the following table are details of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ current and non‑current notes receivable:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
Current        
EnerBank notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses $249
 $233
 $241
 $223
EnerBank notes receivable held for sale 
 19
Non‑current        
EnerBank notes receivable 1,982
 1,624
EnerBank notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses 2,203
 2,258
Total notes receivable $2,231
 $1,857
 $2,444
 $2,500
Consumers        
Current        
DB SERP note receivable – related party $7
 $7
 $7
 $7
Non‑current        
DB SERP note receivable – related party 98
 99
 96
 96
Total notes receivable $105
 $106
 $103
 $103

EnerBank Notes Receivable
EnerBank notes receivable are primarily unsecured, consumerfixed-rate installment loans for financingprovided throughout the U.S. to finance home improvements. EnerBank records its notes receivable at cost, less an allowance for loan losses.
During the six months ended June 30, 2019, EnerBank purchased a portfolio of secured and unsecured consumer installment loans with a principal value of $238 million.


71

Table of Contents


loan losses. Authorized contractors pay fees to EnerBank to provide borrowers with same‑as‑cash, zero interest, or reduced interest loans. Unearned income associated with the loan fees, which is recorded as a reduction to notes receivable on CMS Energy’s consolidated balance sheets, was $122$130 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $102$134 million at December 31, 2018.2019.
At December 31, 2019, $19 million of notes receivable were classified as held for sale. These notes were reclassified as held for investment in March 2020. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, EnerBank purchased a portfolio of secured and unsecured consumer installment loans with a principal value of $9 million.
EnerBank utilizes FICO scores as a key credit quality indicator when underwriting new loans and in assessing the credit exposures in its loan portfolio. The score is determined at the time of a borrower’s application and is generally not updated since the average duration of loans is about two years. At March 31, 2020, 85 percent of EnerBank’s loans had a FICO score rating between good and excellent. At March 31, 2020, 97 percent of EnerBank’s loan portfolio was originated within the past five years.
The allowance for loan losses is a valuationat March 31, 2020 reflects expected credit losses over the entire lifetime of the loan portfolio. EnerBank estimates the allowance by using the “weighted-average remaining maturity” methodology for their term loans, and the “probability of default and loss given default” methodology for their same-as-cash loans. These methodologies consider historical loan loss experience, prepayment expectations, and credit quality indicators. EnerBank considers current and projected economic conditions, and other reasonable and supportable forecast information to reflect estimated credit losses.determine if adjustments to the allowance are necessary. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by loan charge‑offs net of recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required by taking into consideration historical loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, economic conditions, and other factors. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when the loss is confirmed, but no later than the point at which a loan becomes 120 days past due. Presented in the following table are the changes in the allowance for loan losses:
In Millions
Three Months Ended March 312020
Balance at beginning of period$33
Effects of new accounting standard¹62
Provisions for loan losses13
Charge-offs(11)
Recoveries2
Balance at end of period$99
1
The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2019 reflected expected credit losses over a 12-month period. On January 1, 2020, in accordance with ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, the allowance for loan losses was adjusted to reflect expected credit losses over the life of the loan. Additionally, EnerBank recorded $3 million for expected credit losses related to unfunded loan commitments. For further details, see Note 1, New Accounting Standards.
Loans that are 30 days or more past due are considered delinquent. The balance of EnerBank’s delinquent consumer loans was $24$31 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $21$33 million at December 31, 2018.2019. At June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, EnerBank’s loans that had been modified as troubled debt restructurings were immaterial.
As a result of the COVID‑19 pandemic, EnerBank has instituted new payment accommodations for current customers and has experienced slower lending growth. At March 31, 2020, EnerBank had not experienced increased delinquent loans, charge-offs, or increased loan modifications due to the COVID‑19 pandemic. EnerBank did not make any material adjustments to their allowance for loan losses


72

Table of Contents


at March 31, 2020 due to the COVID‑19 pandemic. EnerBank cannot predict the longer-term impacts of the pandemic, but could experience higher loan write-offs, increased loan modifications, and slower lending growth.
EnerBank issues loan commitments to meet customer-financing needs. These commitments are agreements to provide credit as long as certain conditions are met and expire after 120 days. EnerBank uses the same credit policies in making these commitments as it uses for loans. EnerBank had $182 million of off-balance-sheet unfunded loan commitments at March 31, 2020, and had recorded a liability of $3 million for expected credit losses on those commitments.
EnerBank has entered into interest rate swaps on $61$134 million of its loans (notes receivable). For information about interest rate swaps see Note 5, Fair Value Measurements.
DB SERP Note Receivable – Related Party
The DB SERP note receivable – related party is Consumers’ portion of a demand note payable issued by CMS Energy to the DB SERP rabbi trust. The demand note bears interest at an annual rate of 4.10 percent and has a maturity date of 2028.
8:Leases
Lessee
CMS Energy and Consumers lease various assets from third parties, including railcars, real estate, service vehicles, and gas pipeline capacity. In addition, CMS Energy and Consumers account for a number of their PPAs as finance and operating leases.
CMS Energy and Consumers do not record right-of-use assets or lease liabilities on their balance sheets for rentals with lease terms of 12 months or less, most of which are for the lease of real estate and fleet vehicles. Lease expense for these rentals is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Consumers includes future payments for all renewal options that it is reasonably certain to exercise in its measurement of lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. CMS Energy and Consumers include executory costs in the measurement of their right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, except for maintenance costs related to their railcar leases.
Operating leases for coal-carrying railcars have original lease terms ranging from five to 15 years, expiring over the next four years with options to renew. These leases contain fair market value extension and buyout provisions.
Operating leases for real estate have original lease terms ranging from three to 60 years, expiring over the next 42 years. These leases contain fair market value extension and buyout provisions.


72

Table of Contents

Finance leases for Consumers’ service vehicles have original lease terms ranging from five to ten years, expiring over the next seven years. Some have end-of-lease rental adjustment clauses based on proceeds received from the sale or disposition of the vehicles, and others have fair market value purchase options.
Consumers has finance leases for gas transportation pipelines to the D.E. Karn generating complex and Zeeland. The finance lease for the gas transportation pipeline into the D.E. Karn generating complex has a term of 15 years with a provision to extend the contract from month to month. The remaining term of the contract was three years at June 30, 2019. The finance lease for the gas transportation pipeline to Zeeland was extended in 2017 for five years pursuant to a renewal provision in the contract, with additional renewal provisions of five to ten years.
The remaining terms of Consumers’ long-term PPAs accounted for as finance and operating leases range between one and 14 years. Most of these PPAs contain provisions at the end of the initial contract terms to renew the agreements annually under mutually agreed‑upon terms at the time of renewal. Energy and capacity payments that vary depending on quantities delivered are recognized as variable lease costs when incurred. Consumers accounts for a PPA with one of CMS Energy’s equity method subsidiaries as a lease.
Presented in the following table is information about CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities:
In Millions, Except as Noted 
June 30, 2019CMS Energy, including Consumers  Consumers 
Operating leases     
Right-of-use assets1
 $51
  $44
Lease liabilities     
Current lease liabilities2
 10
  8
Non-current lease liabilities3
 41
  35
Finance leases     
Right-of-use assets $76
  $76
Lease liabilities4
     
Current lease liabilities 7
  7
Non-current lease liabilities 63
  63
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)     
Operating leases 16
  13
Finance leases 12
  12
Weighted-average discount rate     
Operating leases 3.7%  3.7%
Finance leases5
 2.0%  2.0%
1
CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ operating right-of-use lease assets are reported as other non‑current assets on their consolidated balance sheets.
2
The current portion of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ operating lease liabilities are reported as other current liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets.
3
The non‑current portion of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ operating lease liabilities are reported as other non‑current liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets.
4
This includes $25 million for leases with related parties, of which less than $1 million is current.


73

Table of Contents

5
This rate excludes the impact of Consumers’ pipeline agreements and long-term PPAs accounted for as finance leases. The required capacity payments under these agreements, when compared to the underlying fair value of the leased assets, result in effective interest rates that exceed market rates for leases with similar terms.
CMS Energy and Consumers report operating, variable, and short-term lease costs as operating expenses on their consolidated statements of income, except for certain amounts that may be capitalized to other assets. Presented in the following table is a summary of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ total lease costs:
In Millions 
 CMS Energy, including Consumers Consumers
June 30, 2019Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
Operating lease costs $3
  $6
  $3
  $5
Finance lease costs           
Amortization of right-of-use assets 2
  4
  2
  4
Interest on lease liabilities 5
  9
  5
  9
Variable lease costs 24
  55
  24
  55
Total lease costs $34
  $74
  $34
  $73

Presented in the following table is cash flow information related to amounts paid on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ lease liabilities:
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019CMS Energy, including Consumers  Consumers 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities     
Cash used in operating activities for operating leases $5
  $5
Cash used in operating activities for finance leases 9
  9
Cash used in financing activities for finance leases 3
  3



74

Table of Contents

Presented in the following table are the minimum rental commitments under CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ non‑cancelable leases:
In Millions 
   Finance Leases
June 30, 2019Operating Leases  Pipelines and PPAs Other Total 
CMS Energy, including Consumers         
Remainder of 2019 $5
  $9
 $5
 $14
2020 11
  17
 6
 23
2021 11
  17
 5
 22
2022 5
  14
 5
 19
2023 3
  13
 5
 18
2024 2
  13
 3
 16
2025 and thereafter 35
  79
 11
 90
Total minimum lease payments $72
  $162
 $40
 $202
Less discount 21
  128
 4
 132
Present value of minimum lease payments $51
  $34
 $36
 $70
Consumers         
Remainder of 2019 $5
  $9
 $5
 $14
2020 9
  17
 6
 23
2021 9
  17
 5
 22
2022 4
  14
 5
 19
2023 3
  13
 5
 18
2024 2
  13
 3
 16
2025 and thereafter 28
  79
 11
 90
Total minimum lease payments $60
  $162
 $40
 $202
Less discount 17
  128
 4
 132
Present value of minimum lease payments $43
  $34
 $36
 $70



75

Table of Contents

Presented in the following table are the minimum rental commitments under CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ non‑cancelable leases at December 31, 2018, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016‑02:
In Millions 
December 31, 2018Capital Leases Operating Leases 
CMS Energy, including Consumers    
2019 $14
 $16
2020 11
 15
2021 11
 15
2022 8
 8
2023 6
 5
2024 and thereafter 21
 38
Total minimum lease payments $71
 $97
Less discount 22
  
Present value of minimum lease payments $49
  
Less current portion 9
  
Non-current portion $40
  
Consumers    
2019 $14
 $14
2020 11
 14
2021 11
 13
2022 8
 7
2023 6
 5
2024 21
 32
Total minimum lease payments $71
 $85
Less discount 22
  
Present value of minimum lease payments $49
  
Less current portion 9
  
Non-current portion $40
  

Lessor
CMS Energy and Consumers are the lessor under power sales and natural gas delivery agreements that are accounted for as leases.
CMS Energy has power sales agreements that are accounted for as operating leases. These agreements have remaining terms ranging from three to 24 years. In addition to fixed payments, these agreements have variable payments based on energy delivered. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, CMS Energy’s lease revenue from its power sales agreements was $42 million, which included variable lease payments of $29 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, CMS Energy’s lease revenue from its power sales agreements was $90 million, which included variable lease payments of $63 million.
Consumers has an agreement to build, own, operate, and maintain a compressed natural gas fueling station for a term of 20 years, which began in December 2018. This agreement is accounted for as a direct finance lease, under which the lessee has the option to purchase the natural gas fueling station at the end of the lease term. Fixed monthly payments escalate annually with inflation.


76

Table of Contents

In December 2018, Consumers and a subsidiary of CMS Energy executed a 20‑year natural gas transportation agreement, related to a pipeline owned by Consumers, which will automatically extend annually unless terminated by either party. This agreement is accounted for by Consumers as a direct finance lease. The effects of the lease are eliminated on CMS Energy’s consolidated financial statements.
Presented in the following table are the minimum rental payments to be received under CMS Energy’s non‑cancelable operating leases:
In Millions 
June 30, 2019
Remainder of 2019 $28
2020 54
2021 54
2022 48
2023 44
2024 44
2025 and thereafter 62
Total minimum lease payments $334

Presented in the following table are the minimum rental payments to be received under CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ non‑cancelable direct financing leases:
In Millions 
June 30, 2019CMS Energy, including Consumers  Consumers 
Remainder of 2019 $
  $1
2020 
  1
2021 
  1
2022 
  1
2023 
  1
2024 
  1
2025 and thereafter 10
  19
Total minimum lease payments $10
  $25
Less unearned income 5
  15
Present value of lease payments recognized as lease receivables $5
  $10



77

Table of Contents

9:8:    Retirement Benefits
CMS Energy and Consumers provide pension, OPEB, and other retirement benefits to employees under a number of different plans.
Presented in the following table are the costs (credits) and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations incurred in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ retirement benefits plans:
In Millions 
 DB Pension Plans OPEB Plan
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018  2019 2018  2019 2018 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Net periodic cost (credit)                   
Service cost $10
 $12
  $20
 $24
  $3
 $5
  $7
 $9
Interest cost 24
 23
  49
 45
  10
 9
  20
 18
Expected return on plan assets (41) (37)  (81) (74)  (22) (25)  (44) (49)
Amortization of:                   
Net loss 12
 19
  24
 37
  6
 4
  13
 8
Prior service cost (credit) 1
 
  1
 1
  (15) (17)  (31) (34)
Net periodic cost (credit) $6
 $17
  $13
 $33
  $(18) $(24)  $(35) $(48)
Consumers
Net periodic cost (credit)                   
Service cost $10
 $11
  $20
 $23
  $4
 $4
  $7
 $8
Interest cost 23
 21
  46
 42
  10
 9
  20
 17
Expected return on plan assets (38) (34)  (76) (69)  (20) (23)  (41) (46)
Amortization of:                   
Net loss 11
 18
  23
 36
  6
 4
  13
 8
Prior service cost (credit) 1
 
  1
 1
  (16) (16)  (31) (32)
Net periodic cost (credit) $7
 $16
  $14
 $33
  $(16) $(22)  $(32) $(45)

In Millions 
 DB Pension Plans OPEB Plan
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019  2020 2019 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Net periodic cost (credit)         
Service cost $12
 $10
  $4
 $4
Interest cost 21
 25
  8
 10
Expected return on plan assets (48) (40)  (25) (22)
Amortization of:         
Net loss 22
 12
  4
 7
Prior service credit 
 
  (14) (16)
Net periodic cost (credit) $7
 $7
  $(23) $(17)
Consumers
Net periodic cost (credit)         
Service cost $12
 $10
  $4
 $3
Interest cost 20
 23
  8
 10
Expected return on plan assets (45) (38)  (23) (21)
Amortization of:         
Net loss 21
 12
  4
 7
Prior service credit 
 
  (14) (15)
Net periodic cost (credit) $8
 $7
  $(21) $(16)


7873

Table of Contents


10:Contributions: In January 2020, CMS Energy, including Consumers, contributed $531 million and Consumers contributed $518 million to the DB Pension Plans.
9:    Income Taxes
Presented in the following table is a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate from continuing operations:
Six Months Ended June 30 2019
 2018
Three Months Ended March 31 2020
 2019
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
U.S. federal income tax rate 21.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 %
Increase (decrease) in income taxes from:        
State and local income taxes, net of federal effect 5.4
 5.6
 4.6
 5.4
TCJA excess deferred taxes1
 (3.5) (3.4)
TCJA excess deferred taxes¹ (3.9) (3.5)
Research and development tax credits, net² (3.4) (0.2)
Alternative minimum tax sequestration³ (3.3) 
Production tax credits (2.5) (1.7) (2.8) (2.4)
Accelerated flow-through of regulatory tax benefits2
 (1.5) (5.0)
Research and development tax credits, net3
 (0.2) (2.2)
Accelerated flow-through of regulatory tax benefits4
 (1.5) (1.5)
Other, net (0.6) 0.3
 (0.7) (0.4)
Effective tax rate 18.1 % 14.6 % 10.0 % 18.4 %
Consumers        
U.S. federal income tax rate 21.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 %
Increase (decrease) in income taxes from:        
State and local income taxes, net of federal effect 5.7
 5.8
 4.9
 5.6
TCJA excess deferred taxes1
 (3.2) (3.2)
Accelerated flow-through of regulatory tax benefits2
 (1.8) (4.7)
TCJA excess deferred taxes¹ (3.4) (3.3)
Research and development tax credits, net² (3.1) (0.2)
Production tax credits (1.3) (1.5) (1.4) (1.0)
Research and development tax credits, net3
 (0.2) (2.1)
Accelerated flow-through of regulatory tax benefits4
 (1.9) (2.5)
Other, net (0.4) 
 (0.3) (0.3)
Effective tax rate 19.8 % 15.3 % 15.8 % 19.3 %
1 
In December 2017, Consumers remeasured its deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new federal tax rate enacted by the TCJA and recorded a $1.8net $1.6 billion regulatory liability. This regulatory liability relates to the excess deferred taxes arising from accelerated tax depreciation on assetsAs a result of an order received in rate base that are governed by normalization provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The normalization provisions require that the excess deferred taxes be refunded to customers over the remaining average service life of the associated assets. In January 2018,September 2019, Consumers began to reduce this regulatory liability by crediting income tax expense. Consumers has fully reserved for the eventual refund ofrefunding these excess deferred taxes that it has credited to incomecustomers.
2
In March 2020, CMSEnergy finalized a study of research and development tax expensecredits for tax years 2012 through 2018. As a result, for the three months ended March 31, 2020, CMS Energy, including Consumers, recognized a $9 million increase in a separate non‑current regulatory liability established by reducing revenue, and will continue to do so until these benefits are passed on to customers in accordance with an MPSC order, expected to be issued in 2019. At June 30, 2019,the credit, net of reserves for uncertain tax positions. Of this reserve for refund of these excess deferred taxes totaled $53 million.amount, $8 million was recognized at Consumers.
23
In January 2020, the IRS issued a decision restoring alternative minimum tax credit refunds sequestered in years prior to 2018. As a result, for the three months ended March 31, 2020, CMS Energy recognized a $9 million income tax benefit for sequestered amounts related to its 2017 tax return. CMS Energy received the refund in April 2020.
4 
In 2013, the MPSC issued an order authorizing Consumers to accelerate the flow‑through to electric and gas customers of certain income tax benefits associated primarily with the cost of removal of plant placed in service before 1993. Consumers implemented this regulatory treatment beginning in 2014, with the electric portion ending in 2018.2018 and the gas portion continuing through 2025. This change, which also accelerates Consumers’ recognition of the income tax benefits, reduced Consumers’ income tax expense by $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and by $22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
3
In March 2018, Consumers finalized a study of research and development tax credits for the tax years 2012 through 2016. As a result, Consumers recognized an $8 million increase in the credit, net of reserves for uncertain tax positions, at that time.


7974

Table of Contents


11:accelerates Consumers’ recognition of the income tax benefits, reduced Consumers’ income tax expense by $5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and by $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
10:    Earnings Per Share—CMS Energy
Presented in the following table are CMS Energy’s basic and diluted EPS computations based on net income:
In Millions, Except Per Share AmountsIn Millions, Except Per Share Amounts In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
Income available to common stockholders            
Net income $94
 $140
 $307
 $381
Less income attributable to noncontrolling interests 1
 1
 1
 1
Net income available to common stockholders – basic and diluted $93
 $139
 $306
 $380
 $243
 $213
Average common shares outstanding            
Weighted-average shares – basic 282.9
 282.1
 282.9
 281.8
 283.3
 282.8
Add dilutive nonvested stock awards 0.6
 0.5
 0.6
 0.6
 0.8
 0.6
Add dilutive forward equity sale contracts 0.5
 
 0.3
 
 1.1
 0.2
Weighted-average shares – diluted 284.0
 282.6
 283.8
 282.4
 285.2
 283.6
Net income per average common share available to common stockholders            
Basic $0.33
 $0.49
 $1.08
 $1.35
 $0.86
 $0.75
Diluted 0.33
 0.49
 1.08
 1.35
 0.85
 0.75

Nonvested Stock Awards
CMS Energy’s nonvested stock awards are composed of participating and non‑participating securities. The participating securities accrue cash dividends when common stockholders receive dividends. Since the recipient is not required to return the dividends to CMS Energy if the recipient forfeits the award, the nonvested stock awards are considered participating securities. As such, the participating nonvested stock awards were included in the computation of basic EPS. The non‑participating securities accrue stock dividends that vest concurrently with the stock award. If the recipient forfeits the award, the stock dividends accrued on the non‑participating securities are also forfeited. Accordingly, the non‑participating awards and stock dividends were included in the computation of diluted EPS, but not in the computation of basic EPS.
Forward Equity Sale Contracts
In November 2018 and February 2019, CMS Energy entered into forward equity sale contracts. These forward equity sale contracts are non‑participating securities. While the forward sale price in the forward equity sale contract is decreased on certain dates by certain predetermined amounts to reflect expected dividend payments, these price adjustments were set upon inception of the agreement and the forward contract does not give the owner the right to participate in undistributed earnings. Accordingly, the forward equity sale contracts were included in the computation of diluted EPS, but not in the computation of basic EPS. For further details on the forward equity sale contracts, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.


8075

Table of Contents


12:11:    Revenue
Presented in the following tables are the components of operating revenue:
In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019Electric Utility Gas Utility 
Enterprises1
 
Other Reconciling2
 Consolidated 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Consumers utility revenue $1,026
 $305
 $
 $
 $1,331
Other 
 
 16
 
 16
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,026
 $305
 $16
 $
 $1,347
Leasing income 
 
 42
 
 42
Financing income 1
 2
 
 53
 56
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $1,027
 $307
 $58
 $53
 $1,445
Consumers
Consumers utility revenue          
Residential $423
 $198
 $
 $
 $621
Commercial 362
 58
 
 
 420
Industrial 174
 8
 
 
 182
Other 67
 41
 
 
 108
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,026
 $305
 $
 $
 $1,331
Financing income 1
 2
 
 
 3
Total operating revenue – Consumers $1,027
 $307
 $
 $
 $1,334


81

Table of Contents

In Millions 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018Electric Utility Gas Utility 
Enterprises1
 
Other Reconciling2
 Consolidated 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Consumers utility revenue $1,087
 $302
 $
 $
 $1,389
Other 
 
 24
 
 24
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,087
 $302
 $24
 $
 $1,413
Leasing income 
 
 37
 
 37
Financing income 2
 2
 
 36
 40
Consumers alternative revenue programs 
 2
 
 
 2
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $1,089
 $306
 $61
 $36
 $1,492
Consumers
Consumers utility revenue          
Residential $475
 $194
 $
 $
 $669
Commercial 386
 58
 
 
 444
Industrial 170
 9
 
 
 179
Other 56
 41
 
 
 97
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,087
 $302
 $
 $
 $1,389
Financing income 2
 2
 
 
 4
Alternative revenue programs 
 2
 
 
 2
Total operating revenue – Consumers $1,089
 $306
 $
 $
 $1,395
In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019Electric Utility Gas Utility 
Enterprises1
 
Other Reconciling2
 Consolidated 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Consumers utility revenue $2,126
 $1,143
 $
 $
 $3,269
Other 
 
 35
 
 35
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $2,126
 $1,143
 $35
 $
 $3,304
Leasing income 
 
 90
 
 90
Financing income 4
 4
 
 102
 110
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $2,130
 $1,147
 $125
 $102
 $3,504
Consumers
Consumers utility revenue          
Residential $946
 $787
 $
 $
 $1,733
Commercial 713
 232
 
 
 945
Industrial 336
 33
 
 
 369
Other 131
 91
 
 
 222
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $2,126
 $1,143
 $
 $
 $3,269
Financing income 4
 4
 
 
 8
Total operating revenue – Consumers $2,130
 $1,147
 $
 $
 $3,277


82

Table of Contents

In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018Electric Utility Gas Utility 
Enterprises1
 
Other Reconciling2
 Consolidated 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020Electric Utility Gas Utility Enterprises¹ EnerBank Consolidated 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Consumers utility revenue $2,163
 $1,075
 $
 $
 $3,238
 $1,025
 $714
 $
 $
 $1,739
Other 
 
 48
 
 48
 
 
 19
 
 19
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $2,163
 $1,075
 $48
 $
 $3,286
 $1,025
 $714
 $19
 $
 $1,758
Leasing income 
 
 76
 
 76
 ���
 
 39
 
 39
Financing income 4
 4
 
 71
 79
 3
 2
 
 62
 67
Consumers alternative revenue programs 
 4
 
 
 4
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $2,167
 $1,083
 $124
 $71
 $3,445
 $1,028
 $716
 $58
 $62
 $1,864
Consumers
Consumers utility revenue                    
Residential $976
 $731
 $
 $
 $1,707
 $481
 $493
 $
 $
 $974
Commercial 747
 220
 
 
 967
 339
 149
 
 
 488
Industrial 313
 33
 
 
 346
 140
 20
 
 
 160
Other 127
 91
 
 
 218
 65
 52
 
 
 117
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $2,163
 $1,075
 $
 $
 $3,238
 $1,025
 $714
 $
 $
 $1,739
Financing income 4
 4
 
 
 8
 3
 2
 
 
 5
Alternative revenue programs 
 4
 
 
 4
Total operating revenue – Consumers $2,167
 $1,083
 $
 $
 $3,250
 $1,028
 $716
 $
 $
 $1,744
1 
Amounts represent the enterprises segment’s operating revenue from independent power production and CMS ERM’sits sales of energy commodities. The enterprises segment’s sales of energy commodities in supportare accounted for as operating leases. In addition to fixed payments, these agreements have variable payments based on energy delivered. The enterprises segment’s leasing income included variable lease payments of $25 million for the independent power production portfolio.three months ended March 31, 2020.


76

Table of Contents


In Millions 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019Electric Utility Gas Utility Enterprises¹ EnerBank Consolidated 
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Consumers utility revenue $1,100
 $838
 $
 $
 $1,938
Other 
 
 19
 
 19
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,100
 $838
 $19
 $
 $1,957
Leasing income 
 
 48
 
 48
Financing income 3
 2
 
 49
 54
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $1,103
 $840
 $67
 $49
 $2,059
Consumers
Consumers utility revenue          
Residential $523
 $589
 $
 $
 $1,112
Commercial 351
 174
 
 
 525
Industrial 162
 25
 
 
 187
Other 64
 50
 
 
 114
Revenue recognized from contracts with customers $1,100
 $838
 $
 $
 $1,938
Financing income 3
 2
 
 
 5
Total operating revenue – Consumers $1,103
 $840
 $
 $
 $1,943
21 
Amount represents EnerBank’sAmounts represent the enterprises segment’s operating revenue from providing primarily unsecured consumer installment loansindependent power production and its sales of energy commodities. The enterprises segment’s sales of energy commodities are accounted for financing home improvements.
as operating leases. In addition to fixed payments, these agreements have variable payments based on energy delivered. The enterprises segment’s leasing income included variable lease payments of $34 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Electric and Gas Utilities
Consumers Utility Revenue: Consumers recognizes revenue primarily from the sale of electric and gas utility services at tariff‑based rates regulated by the MPSC. Consumers’ customer base consists of a mix of residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers. Consumers’ tariff‑based sales performance obligations are described below.
Consumers has performance obligations for the service of standing ready to deliver electricity or natural gas to customers, and it satisfies these performance obligations over time. Consumers recognizes revenue at a fixed rate as it provides these services. These arrangements generally do not have fixed terms and remain in effect as long as the customer consumes the utility service. The rates are set by the MPSC through the rate‑making process and represent the stand‑alone selling price of Consumers’ service to stand ready to deliver.
Consumers has performance obligations for the service of delivering the commodity of electricity or natural gas to customers, and it satisfies these performance obligations upon delivery. Consumers recognizes revenue at a price per unit of electricity or natural gas delivered, based on the tariffs established by the MPSC. These arrangements generally do not have fixed terms and remain in effect as long as the customer consumes the utility service. The rates are set by the


83

Table of Contents

MPSC through the rate‑making process and represent the stand‑alone selling price of a bundled


77

Table of Contents


product comprising the commodity, electricity or natural gas, and the service of delivering such commodity.
In some instances, Consumers has specific fixed‑term contracts with large commercial and industrial customers to provide electricity or gas at certain tariff rates or to provide gas transportation services at contracted rates. The amount of electricity and gas to be delivered under these contracts and the associated future revenue to be received are generally dependent on the customers’ needs. Accordingly, Consumers recognizes revenues at the tariff or contracted rate as electricity or gas is delivered to the customer. Consumers also has other miscellaneous contracts with customers related to pole and other property rentals, appliance service plans, and utility contract work. Generally, these contracts are short term or evergreen in nature.
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenues: Accounts receivable comprise trade receivables and unbilled receivables. CMS Energy and Consumers record their accounts receivable at cost, which approximates fair value.less an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The allowance is increased for uncollectible accounts expense and decreased for account write-offs net of recoveries. CMS Energy and Consumers establish anthe allowance for uncollectible accounts based on historical losses, management’s assessment of existing economic conditions, customer payment trends, and other factors.reasonable and supported forecast information. CMS Energy and Consumers assess late payment fees on trade receivables based on contractual past‑due terms established with customers. CMS Energy and Consumers chargeAccounts are written off accountswhen deemed uncollectible, to operating expense.which is generally when they become six months past due. Uncollectible expense for CMS Energy and Consumers was $5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Uncollectible expense for CMS Energy and Consumers was $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.
Consumers’ customers are billed monthly in cycles having billing dates that do not generally coincide with the end of a calendar month. This results in customers having received electricity or natural gas that they have not been billed for as of the month‑end. Consumers estimates its unbilled revenues by applying an average billed rate to total unbilled deliveries for each customer class. Unbilled revenues, which are recorded as accounts receivable on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ consolidated balance sheets, were $257$354 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $409$426 million at December 31, 2018.2019.
Alternative‑Revenue Programs: The energy waste reduction incentive mechanism provides a financial incentive if the energy savings of Consumers’ customers exceed annual targets established by the MPSC. Consumers accounts for this program as an alternative-revenue program that meets the criteria for recognizing revenue related to the incentive as soon as energy savings exceed the annual targets established by the MPSC.
Under a gas revenue decoupling mechanism authorized by the MPSC, Consumers is allowed to adjust future gas rates for differences between Consumers’ actual weather‑normalized,weather-normalized, non‑fuel revenues and the revenues approved by the MPSC. Consumers accounts for this program as an alternative‑revenuealternative-revenue program that meets the criteria for recognizing the effects of decoupling adjustments on revenue as gas is delivered.
Consumers does not reclassify revenue from its alternative-revenue program to revenue from contracts with customers at the time the amounts are collected from customers.


8478

Table of Contents


13:12:    Cash and Cash Equivalents
Presented in the following table are the components of total cash and cash equivalents, including restricted amounts, and their location on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ consolidated balance sheets:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
Cash and cash equivalents $312
 $153
 $834
 $140
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 22
 21
 27
 17
Other non-current assets 
 1
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted amounts $334
 $175
 $861
 $157
Consumers        
Cash and cash equivalents $196
 $39
 $604
 $11
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 16
 17
 24
 17
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted amounts $212
 $56
 $628
 $28

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include short‑term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents: Restricted cash and cash equivalents are held primarily for the repayment of securitization bonds and funds held in escrow. Cash and cash equivalents may also be restricted to pay other contractual obligations such as leasing of coal railcars. These amounts are classified as current assets since they relate to payments that could or will occur within one year.
Other Non‑current Assets: The cash equivalents classified as other non‑current assets represent an investment in a money market fund held in the DB SERP rabbi trust. See Note 5, Fair Value Measurements for more information regarding the DB SERP.


8579

Table of Contents


14:13:    Reportable Segments
Reportable segments consist of business units defined by the products and services they offer. CMS Energy and Consumers evaluate the performance of each segment based on its contribution to net income available to CMS Energy’s common stockholders.
CMS Energy
The reportable segments reported for CMS Energy are:
electric utility, consisting of regulated activities associated with the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity in Michigan
gas utility, consisting of regulated activities associated with the purchase, transmission, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas in Michigan
enterprises, consisting of various subsidiaries engaging in domestic independent power production, including the development and operation of renewable generation, and the marketing of independent power production
EnerBank, a Utah state-chartered, FDIC-insured industrial bank providing primarily unsecured, fixed-rate installment loans throughout the U.S. to finance home improvements
CMS Energy presents EnerBank, corporate interest and other expenses and Consumers’ other consolidated entities within other reconciling items.
Consumers
The reportable segments reported for Consumers are:
electric utility, consisting of regulated activities associated with the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity in Michigan
gas utility, consisting of regulated activities associated with the purchase, transmission, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas in Michigan
Consumers’ other consolidated entities are presented within other reconciling items.


8680

Table of Contents


Presented in the following tables is financial information by reportable segment:
In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 302019 2018  2019 2018 
Three Months Ended March 312020 2019 
CMS Energy, including Consumers             
Operating revenue            
Electric utility $1,027
 $1,089
 $2,130
 $2,167
 $1,028
 $1,103
Gas utility 307
 306
 1,147
 1,083
 716
 840
Enterprises 58
 61
 125
 124
 58
 67
Other reconciling items 53
 36
 102
 71
EnerBank 62
 49
Total operating revenue – CMS Energy $1,445
 $1,492
 $3,504
 $3,445
 $1,864
 $2,059
Consumers            
Operating revenue            
Electric utility $1,027
 $1,089
 $2,130
 $2,167
 $1,028
 $1,103
Gas utility 307
 306
 1,147
 1,083
 716
 840
Total operating revenue – Consumers $1,334
 $1,395
 $3,277
 $3,250
 $1,744
 $1,943
CMS Energy, including Consumers            
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders 

 

        
Electric utility $90
 $130
 $195
 $269
 $118
 $105
Gas utility 8
 21
 129
 124
��117
 121
Enterprises 10
 14
 11
 29
Other reconciling items (15) (26) (29) (42)
Enterprises¹ 20
 7
EnerBank¹ 14
 11
Other reconciling items¹ (26) (31)
Total net income available to common stockholders – CMS Energy $93
 $139
 $306
 $380
 $243
 $213
Consumers            
Net income (loss) available to common stockholder 

 

    
Net income available to common stockholder    
Electric utility $90
 $130
 $195
 $269
 $118
 $105
Gas utility 8
 21
 129
 124
 117
 121
Other reconciling items (1) 
 (1) 
Total net income available to common stockholder – Consumers $97
 $151
 $323
 $393
 $235
 $226
1
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect changes in segment reporting.


8781

Table of Contents


In MillionsIn Millions In Millions 
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
Plant, property, and equipment, gross        
Electric utility1, 2
 $15,660
 $16,027
Gas utility1
 8,154
 7,919
Electric utility¹ $16,338
 $16,158
Gas utility¹ 8,887
 8,785
Enterprises 405
 412
 407
 405
EnerBank 22
 22
Other reconciling items 44
 42
 21
 20
Total plant, property, and equipment, gross – CMS Energy $24,263
 $24,400
 $25,675
 $25,390
Consumers        
Plant, property, and equipment, gross        
Electric utility1, 2
 $15,660
 $16,027
Gas utility1
 8,154
 7,919
Electric utility¹ $16,338
 $16,158
Gas utility¹ 8,887
 8,785
Other reconciling items 19
 17
 21
 20
Total plant, property, and equipment, gross – Consumers $23,833
 $23,963
 $25,246
 $24,963
CMS Energy, including Consumers        
Total assets        
Electric utility1
 $14,396
 $14,079
Gas utility1
 7,890
 7,806
Electric utility¹ $15,397
 $14,911
Gas utility¹ 8,678
 8,659
Enterprises 522
 540
 553
 527
EnerBank 2,640
 2,692
Other reconciling items 2,484
 2,104
 179
 48
Total assets – CMS Energy $25,292
 $24,529
 $27,447
 $26,837
Consumers        
Total assets        
Electric utility1
 $14,459
 $14,143
Gas utility1
 7,937
 7,853
Electric utility¹ $15,459
 $14,973
Gas utility¹ 8,725
 8,706
Other reconciling items 20
 29
 22
 20
Total assets – Consumers $22,416
 $22,025
 $24,206
 $23,699
1 
Amounts include a portion of Consumers’ other common assets attributable to both the electric and gas utility businesses.
2
Costs related to coal-fueled electric generating units to be retired in 2023 were removed and recorded as a regulatory asset in June 2019. For additional details, see Note 2, Regulatory Matters.


8882

Table of Contents


15: Asset Sales14: Exit Activities
EnterprisesUnder its Clean Energy Plan, Consumers plans to retire the D.E. Karn 1 & 2 coal-fueled generating units in 2023. In October 2019, Consumers announced a retention incentive program to ensure necessary staffing at the D.E. Karn generating complex through the anticipated retirement of the coal-fueled generating units. Based on the number of employees that have chosen to participate, the aggregate cost of the program through 2023 is estimated to be $35 million. Consumers is seeking recovery of these costs from customers in its 2020 electric rate case.
In April 2019, DIG completed a sale of transmission equipmentFor the three months ended March 31, 2020, Consumers’ electric utility recognized $4 million related to ITC and recognized a pre-tax gain of $16 millionretention benefits within maintenance and other operating expenses on CMS Energy’sConsumers’ consolidated statements of income.
Consumers
During the first quarter The cumulative cost incurred and charged to expense related to this program is $7 million; an amount of 2019, management committed to$1 million has been capitalized as a plan to sell a portioncost of Consumers’ electric utility’s substation transmission assets. Consumers expects to sell these assets to METC in 2019, at a price above their book value.
plant, property, and equipment. Presented in the following table areis a reconciliation of the major classes of assets classified as held for saleretention benefit liability recorded in other liabilities on Consumers’ consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2019:sheets:
In Millions 
 March 31, 2020 
Retention benefit liability at beginning of period $4
Costs incurred and charged to expense 4
Retention benefit liability at the end of the period¹ $8
In Millions
1
Plant, property, and equipment, net$32
Construction work in progress8
Total assets$40
Includes current portion of other liabilities of $4 million.

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for CMS Energy and Consumers is contained in Part I—Item 1. Financial Statements—MD&A, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes to market risk as previously disclosed in Part II—Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in the 20182019 Form 10‑K.
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
CMS Energy
Disclosure Controls and Procedures: CMS Energy’s management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, CMS Energy’s CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, its disclosure controls and procedures are effective.


83

Table of Contents


Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in CMS Energy’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f) under


89

Table of Contents

the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Consumers
Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Consumers’ management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, Consumers’ CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, its disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in Consumers’ internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Part II—Other Information
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings
CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain of their affiliates are parties to various lawsuits and regulatory matters in the ordinary course of business. For information regarding material legal proceedings, including updates to information reported under Part I—Item 3. Legal Proceedings, of the 20182019 Form 10‑K, see Part I—Item 1. Financial Statements—Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2, Regulatory Matters and Note 3, Contingencies and Commitments.
Item 1A.    Risk Factors
There have been no material changesThe following Risk Factor is in addition to theour Risk Factors as previously disclosedincluded in Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors, in the 20182019 Form 10‑K,K. Actual results in future periods for CMS Energy and Consumers could differ materially from historical results and the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Factors that might cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed in the following sections and in Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors, in the 2019 Form 10‑K. CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, that involve uncertainties that may materially affect results, and that are often beyond their control. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or that management believes to be immaterial may also adversely affect CMS Energy or Consumers. The Risk Factor, as well as the other information included in this report and in other documents filed with the SEC, should be considered carefully before making an investment in securities of CMS Energy or Consumers. Risk factors of Consumers are also risk factors of CMS Energy.
The COVID‑19 pandemic could materially and adversely affect each of CMSEnergy’s and Consumers’ business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and cash flows.
The COVID‑19 pandemic has had widespread impacts on people, businesses, economies, and financial markets globally, in the U.S., and in markets where CMS Energy and Consumers conduct business. Future impacts of the pandemic could include a prolonged reduction in economic activity, extended disruption to supply chains and operations, and reduced availability of labor and productivity. CMS Energy and Consumers provide essential services, which means that CMS Energy and Consumers must keep employees, who operate facilities or interact with customers, safe and minimize unnecessary


84

Table of Contents


risk of exposure to COVID‑19. CMS Energy and Consumers have taken extra precautions in an effort to protect the health of employees working in the field and in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ facilities. CMS Energy and Consumers have also implemented work-from-home policies where possible. Consumers has suspended shut-offs of service for non-payment and extended payment protection plans for low-income and senior customers through June 1, 2020. This is a rapidly evolving situation; CMS Energy and Consumers will continue to monitor developments and will take additional necessary precautions in order to keep employees, customers, contractors, and communities safe.
The ultimate impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic depends on factors beyond CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ knowledge or control. In the near term, Consumers has experienced a decline in electric deliveries to commercial and industrial customers and EnerBank has experienced slower lending growth as a result of the pandemic. Over the long term, the pandemic could have numerous and significant adverse effects on CMS Energy and Consumers, including but not limited to adverse effects on their business and operations,sales, uncollectible accounts, capital expenditures, energy efficiency programs, pension expenses, and PSCR and GCR costs. The companies’ business and operations could also be adversely affected by an inability to obtain necessary approvals or authorizations from the MPSC, FERC, courts, or other governmental authorities in a timely manner and by the nature of any emergency or other actions taken by such agencies, courts, or authorities. Additionally, EnerBank could experience higher loan write-offs, increased loan modifications, and continued slower lending growth.
CMS Energy and Consumers cannot predict how or to what extent the COVID‑19 pandemic will negatively impact CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ results of operations, capital investment program, financial condition, cash flows, or liquidity. To the extent the COVID‑19 pandemic adversely affects CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, cash flows, or capital investment program, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors are incorporated herein, in the 2019 Form 10‑K. The degree to which COVID‑19 will impact CMS Energy and Consumers will depend in part on future developments, including the severity and duration of the outbreak, actions or inactions that may be taken by reference.governmental authorities, and to what extent and when normal economic and operational conditions can resume.
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.


9085

Table of Contents


Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
Presented in the following table are CMS Energy’s repurchases of equity securities for the three months ended June 30, 2019:March 31, 2020:
Period
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased1
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
 
Maximum Number of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
 
April 1, 2019 to April 30, 2019 2,940
 $54.05
 
 
May 1, 2019 to May 31, 2019 86
 54.58
 
 
June 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 555
 57.95
 
 
Total 3,581
 $54.67
 
 
PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased¹ Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
January 1, 2020 to January 31, 2020 120,145
 $65.65
 
 
February 1, 2020 to February 29, 2020 1,183
 68.51
 
 
March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020 78,722
 49.57
 
 
Total 200,050
 $59.34
 
 
1 
All of the common shares were repurchased to satisfy the minimum statutory income tax withholding obligation for common shares that have vested under the Performance Incentive Stock Plan. The value of shares repurchased is based on the market price on the vesting date.
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.    Other Information
None.


9186

Table of Contents


(This page intentionally left blank)


92

Table of Contents


Item 6.    Exhibits
CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ Exhibit Index
The agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10‑Q filing are included solely to provide information regarding the terms of the agreements and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about CMS Energy, Consumers, or other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties made by each of the parties to each of the agreements that were made exclusively for the benefit of the parties involved in each of the agreements and should not be treated as statements of fact. The representations and warranties were made as a way to allocate risk if one or more of those statements prove to be incorrect. The statements were qualified by disclosures of the parties to each of the agreements that may not be reflected in each of the agreements. The agreements may apply standards of materiality that are different than standards applied to other investors. Additionally, the statements were made as of the date of the agreements or as specified in the agreements and have not been updated. The representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs of the parties to each agreement.
Additional information about CMS Energy and Consumers may be found in this filing, at www.cmsenergy.com, at www.consumersenergy.com, and through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Exhibits Description
4.1
10.11
10.21
10.31,2
31.1
31.2
31.3
31.4
32.1
32.2


87

Table of Contents


ExhibitsDescription
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
104.1Included in the cover page, formatted in Inline XBRL
1
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
2
Obligations of CMS Energy or its subsidiaries, but not of Consumers.


9388

Table of Contents


Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiary.
  CMS ENERGY CORPORATION
   
Dated: July 25, 2019April 27, 2020By:/s/ Rejji P. Hayes
  Rejji P. Hayes
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
   
  CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
   
Dated: July 25, 2019April 27, 2020By:/s/ Rejji P. Hayes
  Rejji P. Hayes
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


9489