- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------




                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.  20549


                                 FORM 10-Q


          QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

             FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 1997

                       Commission file number 1-9447




                        KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION
           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


              DELAWARE                               94-3030279
      (State of incorporation)            (I.R.S. Employer Identification 
                                             No.)


          5847 SAN FELIPE, SUITE 2600, HOUSTON, TEXAS  77057-3010
            (Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)


                               (713) 267-3777
            (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes   x        No       
    -----------         ------

     At July 28,October 31, 1997, the registrant had 71,710,14378,980,881 shares of Common
Stock outstanding.





- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

            KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                       PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
         --------------------

                        CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                          (In millions of dollars)
JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 1997 1996 ------------------------------ ASSETS (Unaudited) Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 17.426.3 $ 81.3 Receivables 289.8305.0 252.4 Inventories 564.5553.3 562.2 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 133.0125.1 127.8 ------------------------------ Total current assets 1,004.71,009.7 1,023.7 Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates 166.5158.1 168.4 Property, plant, and equipment - net 1,161.11,162.9 1,168.7 Deferred income taxes 279.9298.0 264.5 Other assets 356.8335.6 308.7 ------------------------------ Total $ 2,969.02,964.3 $ 2,934.0 ============================== LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 148.1161.1 $ 189.7 Accrued interest 37.624.8 35.6 Accrued salaries, wages, and related expenses 82.276.7 95.4 Accrued postretirement medical benefit obligation - current portion 50.1 50.1 Other accrued liabilities 119.5121.4 132.7 Payable to affiliates 104.1103.1 97.0 Long-term debt - current portion 5.82.7 8.9 ------------------------------ Total current liabilities 547.4539.9 609.4 Long-term liabilities 500.5515.8 458.1 Accrued postretirement medical benefit obligation 717.8714.6 722.5 Long-term debt 999.6969.3 953.0 Minority interests 121.5124.7 121.7 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock .4 .4 Common stock .7.8 .7 Additional capital 532.0534.0 531.1 Accumulated deficit (448.1)(432.0) (460.1) Additional minimum pension liability (2.8) (2.8) ------------------------------ Total stockholders' equity 82.2100.0 69.3 ------------------------------ Total $ 2,969.02,964.3 $ 2,934.0 ==============================
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars, except share amounts)
Quarter Ended SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, JuneSeptember 30, ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1997 1996 1997 1996 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Net sales $ 597.1634.1 $ 567.6553.4 $ 1,144.51,778.6 $ 1,098.71,652.1 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Costs and expenses: Cost of products sold 489.3 476.1 950.0 909.8523.7 485.0 1,473.7 1,394.8 Depreciation 22.8 24.2 45.9 48.222.9 24.3 68.8 72.5 Selling, administrative, research and development, and general 30.0 30.7 62.3 63.833.0 33.6 95.3 97.4 Restructuring of operations 19.7 19.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total costs and expenses 561.8 531.0 1,077.9 1,021.8579.6 542.9 1,657.5 1,564.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Operating income 35.3 36.6 66.6 76.954.5 10.5 121.1 87.4 Other income (expense): Interest expense (28.1) (23.0) (55.8) (45.7)(27.5) (22.6) (83.3) (68.3) Other - net (3.2) 1.2 (.4) .92.1 2.1 1.7 3.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests 4.0 14.8 10.4 32.129.1 (10.0) 39.5 22.1 (Provision) benefit for income taxes 11.0 (5.6) 8.6 (12.2)(11.0) 3.8 (2.4) (8.4) Minority interests (1.3) (1.0) (2.7) (1.8)(.6) (.4) (3.3) (2.2) ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Net income 13.7 8.2 16.3 18.1(loss) 17.5 (6.6) 33.8 11.5 Dividends on preferred stock (1.3) (2.1) (2.1) (4.2) (4.2)(5.5) (6.3) ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ 11.616.2 $ 6.1(8.7) $ 12.128.3 $ 13.95.2 ============================== ============================== Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent shareshare: Primary $ .16.22 $ .09(.12) $ .17.39 $ .19.07 ============================== ============================== Fully diluted $ .22 $ .43 ============== ============== Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (000) 71,837 71,855 71,829 71,876 ============================== ==============================: Primary 74,663 71,646 72,775 71,843 Fully diluted 79,193 79,164
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars)
SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, ------------------------------ 1997 1996 ------------------------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 16.333.8 $ 18.111.5 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used forprovided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation 45.9 48.268.8 72.5 Restructuring of operations 19.7 Non-cash benefit for income taxes (12.5) Amortization of excess investment over equity in unconsolidated affiliates 5.8 5.88.7 8.7 Amortization of deferred financing costs and net discount on long-term debt 3.0 2.74.5 4.1 Undistributed equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions 12.0 (7.9)16.7 (7.5) Minority interests 2.7 1.83.3 2.2 (Increase) decrease in receivables (47.7) 30.4 Increase(59.5) 41.0 (Increase) decrease in inventories (5.5) (33.0) Increase5.7 (19.8) (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets (15.7) (31.2)1.1 (38.1) Decrease in accounts payable (41.6) (21.5) Increase(28.6) (24.1) Decrease in accrued interest 2.0 .1(10.8) (18.4) Decrease in payable to affiliates and accrued liabilities (18.7) (20.1)(29.8) (23.1) Decrease in accrued and deferred income taxes (6.6) (8.6)(2.1) (18.6) Other (.9) 3.73.6 4.6 ------------------------------ Net cash used forprovided (used) by operating activities (41.8) (11.5)22.6 (5.0) ------------------------------ Cash flows from investing activities: Net proceeds from disposition of property and investments 22.1 1.2 Additions to property, plant, and equipment (68.8) (51.9) Redemption fund for minority interests' preference stock (2.5)22.2 1.6 Capital expenditures (94.7) (91.1) Other (2.6) (1.3) ------------------------------ Net cash used forby investing activities (49.2) (52.0)(75.1) (90.8) ------------------------------ Cash flows from financing activities: Borrowings under revolving credit facility, net 30.0 67.3118.1 Borrowings of long-term debt 19.0 Repayments of long-term debt (5.1) (5.6)(8.6) (9.0) Increase in restricted cash, net (10.1)(6.5) Incurrence of financing costs (.5)(0.6) Dividends paid (4.2) (4.2)(8.4) Capital stock issued .4 Redemption of minority interests' preference stock (2.0) (5.1)(5.2) ------------------------------ Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 27.1 52.4(2.5) 95.5 ------------------------------ Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the period (63.9) (11.1)(55.0) (.3) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 81.3 21.9 ------------------------------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 17.426.3 $ 10.821.6 ============================== Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Interest paid, net of capitalized interest $ 50.989.5 $ 42.982.7 Income taxes paid 9.1 17.414.8 22.4 Tax allocation payments to MAXXAM Inc. 1.1
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In millions of dollars, except prices and per share amounts) 1. GENERAL Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the "Company") is a subsidiary of MAXXAM Inc. ("MAXXAM"). MAXXAM and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries together own approximately 62% of the Company's Common Stock, assuming the conversion of each outstanding share of 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred Stock (the "PRIDES"), into one share63% of the Company's Common Stock with the remaining approximately 38%37% publicly held. The Company operates through its subsidiary, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation ("KACC"). The foregoing unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 1997. 2. INVENTORIES The classification of inventories is as follows:
JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 1997 1996 ------------------------------ Finished fabricated aluminum products $ 119.495.4 $ 113.5 Primary aluminum and work in process 189.8220.7 200.3 Bauxite and alumina 125.7110.5 110.2 Operating supplies and repair and maintenance parts 129.6126.7 138.2 ------------------------------ Total $ 564.5553.3 $ 562.2 ==============================
Substantially all product inventories are stated at last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost, not in excess of market. Replacement cost is not in excess of LIFO cost. 3. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL REVENUE BONDS In March 1997, KACC entered into an agreement (the "Loan Agreement") with the Industrial Development Corporation of Spokane County, Washington (the "IDC") in connection with which the IDC issued $19.0 of 7.6% Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds due 2027 (the "Bonds") and loaned the proceeds to KACC to finance the construction of certain qualifying expenditures at its Mead smelter, which are part of the previously announced modernization and expansion of Mead's carbon baking furnace. The net proceeds from the sale of the Bonds of approximately $18.6 were deposited into a restricted construction account (the balance of which is included in Other Assets)assets) and may be withdrawn from time to time by KACC, pursuant to the Loan Agreement and Bond indenture. The Loan Agreement requires KACC to make payments on the dates and in the amounts required to permit the IDC to satisfy all of its payment obligations under the Bonds and related indenture. 4. EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE PRIMARY Earnings per common and common equivalent share are computed by deducting dividends on the 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred Stock (the "PRIDES") from net income in order to determine net income available to common shareholders. This amount is then divided by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The impact of the number of outstanding stock options on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares for the quarters and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, and 1996, was immaterial. FULLY DILUTED For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 1997, fully diluted earnings per share are presented even though the results are antidilutive as a result of the August 1997 conversion of the PRIDES. The fully diluted computations for these periods assume that the conversion of the PRIDES had occurred at the beginning of each period. Accordingly, the dividend amounts for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 1997, of $1.3 and $5.5, respectively, have not been deducted from net income and the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares has been adjusted to reflect the 7,227,848 shares of the Company's Common Stock issued upon conversion of the PRIDES in August 1997 as if they had been outstanding from the beginning of each period. The PRIDES were excluded from the calculation of the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding for all periods presentedthe quarter and nine-months ended September 30, 1996, because they were antidilutive. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS No. 128"). Under SFAS No. 128, primary earnings per share ("Primary EPS") will be replaced by basic earnings per share ("Basic EPS"), and fully diluted earnings per share ("Fully Diluted EPS") will be replaced with diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS"). Basic EPS differs from Primary EPS in that it only includes the weighted average impact of outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock (i.e., it excludes common stock equivalents and the dilutive effect of options, etc.) Diluted EPS is substantially similar to Fully Diluted EPS as previously reported. The provisions of SFAS No. 128 will result in the retroactive restatement of previously reported Primary EPS and Fully Diluted EPS figures, but SFAS No. 128 prohibits such restatement prior to December 31, 1997. Based on the Company's computations, the adoption of SFAS No. 128 is not expected to impact earnings per share amounts reported during the current quarter or any recent prior period. 5. CONTINGENCIES ENVIRONMENTAL CONTINGENCIES The Company and KACC are subject to a number of environmental laws, to fines or penalties assessed for alleged breaches of such environmental laws, and to claims and litigation based upon such laws. KACC currently is subject to a number of lawsuits under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("CERCLA"), and, along with certain other entities, has been named as a potentially responsible party for remedial costs at certain third-party sites listed on the National Priorities List under CERCLA. Based on the Company's evaluation of these and other environmental matters, the Company has established environmental accruals primarily related to potential solid waste disposal and soil and groundwater remediation matters. At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the balance of such accruals, which are primarily included in Long-term liabilities, was $31.9.$30.8. These environmental accruals represent the Company's estimate of costs reasonably expected to be incurred based on presently enacted laws and regulations, currently available facts, existing technology, and the Company's assessment of the likely remediation actions to be taken. The Company expects that these remediation actions will be taken over the next several years and estimates that annual expenditures to be charged to these environmental accruals will be approximately $3.0 to $9.0$8.0 for the years 1997 through 2001 and an aggregate of approximately $6.0$7.0 thereafter. As additional facts are developed and definitive remediation plans and necessary regulatory approvals for implementation of remediation are established or alternative technologies are developed, changes in these and other factors may result in actual costs exceeding the current environmental accruals. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that costs associated with these environmental matters may exceed current accruals by amounts that could range, in the aggregate, up to an estimated $23.0 and that,$19.0. As the resolution of these matters is subject to further regulatory review and approval, no specific assurance can be given as to when the factors upon which a substantial portion of this estimate is based arecan be expected to be resolved during 1997.resolved. However, the Company is currently working to resolve certain of these matters. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of these environmental matters, and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, management currently believes that the resolution of such uncertainties should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. ASBESTOS CONTINGENCIES KACC is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims of multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that certain of their injuries were caused by, among other things, exposure to asbestos during, and as a result of, their employment or association with KACC or exposure to products containing asbestos produced or sold by KACC. The lawsuits generally relate to products KACC has not manufactured for at least 20 years. At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the number of such claims pending was approximately 74,300,71,200, as compared with 71,100 at December 31, 1996. In 1996, approximately 21,100 of such claims were received and 9,700 were settled or dismissed. During the quarter and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, approximately 3,0003,400 and 5,6009,000 of such claims were received and 1,2006,500 and 2,4008,900 of such claims were settled or dismissed, respectively. Based on past experience and reasonably anticipated future activity, the Company has established an accrual for estimated asbestos-related costs for claims filed and estimated to be filed through 2008. There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimating asbestos-related costs, and the Company's actual costs could exceed or be less than these estimates. The Company's accrual was calculated based on the current and anticipated number of asbestos-related claims, the prior timing and amounts of asbestos-related payments, and the advice of Wharton Levin Ehrmantraut Klein & Nash, P.A. with respect to the current state of the law related to asbestos claims. Accordingly, an estimated asbestos-related cost accrual of $157.3,$156.8, before consideration of insurance recoveries, is included primarily in Long-term liabilities at JuneSeptember 30, 1997. While the Company does not presently believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating such costs beyond 2008 and, accordingly, no accrual has been recorded for such costs which may be incurred beyond 2008, there is a reasonable possibility that such costs may continue beyond 2008, and such costs may be substantial. The Company estimates that annual future cash payments in connection with such litigation will be approximately $13.0 to $20.0 for each of the years 1997 through 2001, and an aggregate of approximately $81.0$86.0 thereafter. The Company believes that KACC has insurance coverage available to recover a substantial portion of its asbestos-related costs. Claims for recovery from some of KACC's insurance carriers are currently subject to pending litigation and other carriers have raised certain defenses, which have resulted in delays in recovering costs from the insurance carriers. The timing and amount of ultimate recoveries from these insurance carriers are dependent upon the resolution of these disputes. The Company believes, based on prior insurance-related recoveries in respect of asbestos-related claims, existing insurance policies, and the advice of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges LLP with respect to applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of those policies, that substantial recoveries from the insurance carriers are probable. Accordingly, an estimated aggregate insurance recovery of $131.8,$127.9, determined on the same basis as the asbestos-related cost accrual, is recorded primarily in Other assets at JuneSeptember 30, 1997. Management continues to monitor claims activity, the status of lawsuits (including settlement initiatives), legislative progress, and costs incurred in order to ascertain whether an adjustment to the existing accruals should be made to the extent that historical experience may differ significantly from the Company's underlying assumptions. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of these asbestos matters and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred and insurance recoveries that will be received, management currently believes that, based on the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the resolution of asbestos-related uncertainties and the incurrence of asbestos-related costs net of related insurance recoveries should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. OTHER CONTINGENCIES The Company and KACC are involved in various other claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to a wide variety of matters. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of such matters, and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, management currently believes that the resolution of such uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1996. 6. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED HEDGING PROGRAMS At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the net unrealized loss, including unamortized net option premiums, on KACC's position in aluminum forward sales and option contracts, (based on an average price of $1,621$1,647 per ton* ($.74.75 per pound) of primary aluminum), natural gas and fuel oil forward purchase and option contracts, and forward foreign exchange contracts, was approximately $13.6.$11.6. ALUMINA AND ALUMINUM The Company's earnings are sensitive to changes in the prices of alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to a significant degree upon the volume and mix of all products sold. Primary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant cyclical fluctuations. During the period from January 1, 1993, through June- ------------ *All references to tons in this report refer to metric tons of 2,204.6 pounds. September 30, 1997, the Average Midwest United States transaction price for primary aluminum has ranged from approximately $.50 to $1.00 per pound. Alumina prices as well as fabricated aluminum product prices (which vary considerably among products) are significantly influenced by changes in the price of primary aluminum but generally lag behind primary aluminum price changes by up to three months. * All references to tons in this report refer to metric tons of 2,204.6 pounds. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, KACC enters into hedging transactions to provide price risk management in respect of the net exposure of earnings resulting from (i) anticipated sales of alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, less (ii) expected purchases of certain items, such as aluminum scrap, rolling ingot, and bauxite, whose prices fluctuate with the price of primary aluminum. Forward sales contracts are used by KACC to effectively lock-in or fix the price that KACC will receive for its shipments. KACC also uses option contracts (i) to establish a minimum price for its product shipments, (ii) to establish a "collar" or range of prices for KACC's anticipated sales, and/or (iii) to permit KACC to realize possible upside price movements. As of JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC had sold forward, at fixed prices, approximately 34,500,17,300, 93,600 and 24,000 tons of primary aluminum with respect to 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. As of JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC had also purchased put options to establish a minimum price for approximately 91,10042,100 and 52,000 tons of primary aluminum with respect to 1997 and 1998, respectively, and had entered into option contracts that established a price range for an additional 78,000,51,000, 231,600 and 124,500 tons for 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. As of JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC had sold forward virtually all of the alumina available to it in excess of its projected internal smelting requirements for 1997, 1998 and 1999 at prices indexed to future prices of primary aluminum. ENERGY KACC is exposed to energy price risk from fluctuating prices for fuel oil and natural gas consumed in the production process. Accordingly, KACC from time to time in the ordinary course of business enters into hedging transactions with major suppliers of energy and energy related financial instruments. As of JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC had a combination of fixed price purchase and option contracts for the purchase of approximately 40,00044,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day during the remainder of 1997, and for 25,00041,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day for 1998. As of JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC also held a combination of fixed price purchase and option contracts for an average of 216,000, 222,000228,000, 232,000 and 25,000 barrels of fuel oil per month for 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. FOREIGN CURRENCY KACC enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge material cash commitments to foreign subsidiaries or affiliates. At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC had net forward foreign exchange contracts totaling approximately $147.8$135.0 for the purchase of 192.0175.5 Australian dollars from JulyOctober 1997 through December 1998, in respect of its commitments for 1997 and 1998 expenditures denominated in Australian dollars. At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, KACC also held options to purchase approximately 20.010.0 Australian dollars over the last sixthree months of 1997. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1996. 7. RESTRUCTURING OF OPERATIONS The Company has previously disclosed that it set a goal of achieving significant cost reductions and other profit improvements, with the full effect planned to be realized in 1998.1998 and beyond, measured against 1996 results. The initiative is based on the Company's conclusion that the current level of performance of its existing facilities and businesses willwould not achieve the level of profits the Company considers satisfactory based upon historic long-term average prices for primary aluminum and alumina. During the second quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a $19.7 restructuring charge to reflect actions taken and plans put in placeinitiated to achieve the reduced production costs, decreased corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, and enhanced product mix intended to achieve this goal. The significant components of the restructuring charge are enumerated below. ERIE PLANT DISPOSITION During the second quarter of 1997, the Company formed a joint venture with a third party related to the assets and liabilities associated with the wheel manufacturing operations at its Erie, Pennsylvania, fabrication plant. The Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the formation of the new entity. Management subsequently decided to close the remainder of the Erie plant in order to consolidate its aluminum forgings operations at two other facilities for increased efficiency. As a result of the joint venture formation and plant closure, the Company recognized a net pre-tax loss of approximately $1.4. OTHER ASSET DISPOSITIONS As a part of the Company's profit enhancement and cost reduction initiative, management made decisions regarding product rationalization and geographical optimization, which led management to decide to dispose of certain assets which had nominal operating contribution. These strategic decisions resulted in the Company recognizing a pre-tax charge for approximately $15.6 associated with such asset dispositions. EMPLOYEE AND OTHER COSTS As a part of the Company's profit enhancement and cost reduction initiative, management concluded that certain corporate and other staff functions could be consolidated or eliminated resulting in a second quarter pre-tax charge of approximately $2.7 for benefit and other costs. 8. COMPLETED ACQUISITION During June 1997, Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of KACC, completed the acquisition of Reynolds Metals Company's Bellwood, Virginia, extrusion plant and its existing inventories for a total purchase price (after post-closing adjustments) of $44.1,$41.6, consisting of cash payments of $40.1$38.4 and the assumption of approximately $4.0$3.2 of employee related and other liabilities. The purchase price is subject to certain post-closing adjustments. KACC's Credit Agreement was amended in June 1997, to provide for the acquisition of the Bellwood facility. Additionally, uponUpon completion of the transaction, Kaiser Bellwood Corporation became a subsidiary guarantor under the indentures in respect of KACC's 9-7/8% Senior Notes due 2002, 10-7/8% Series B and Series D Senior Notes due 2006, and 12-3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2003. 9. CONVERSION OF PRIDES TO COMMON STOCK During August 1997, the 8,673,850 outstanding shares of PRIDES were converted into 7,227,848 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the PRIDES Certificate of Designations. Further, in accordance with the PRIDES Certificate of Designations, no dividends were paid or payable for the period June 30, 1997, to, but not including, the date of conversion. However, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the $1.3 of accrued dividends attributable to the period June 30, 1997, to, but not including, the conversion date is treated as an increase in Additional capital at the date of conversion and must still be reflected as a reduction of Net income (loss) available to common shareholders. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS --------------------- This section should be read in conjunction with the response to Item 1, Part I, of this Report. This section contains statements which constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear in a number of places in this section (see, for example, "Profit Enhancement and Cost Reduction Initiative," "Results of Operations," and "Liquidity and Capital Resources"). Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "estimates," "will," "should," "plans" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These factors include the effectiveness of management's strategies and decisions, general economic and business conditions, developments in technology, new or modified statutory or regulatory requirements, and changing prices and market conditions. This section and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, each identify other factors that could cause such differences. No assurance can be given that these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements. PROFIT ENHANCEMENTRECENT EVENTS AND COST REDUCTION INITIATIVEDEVELOPMENTS The Company has previously disclosed that it has set a goal of achieving significant cost reductions and other profit improvements, with the full effect planned to be realized in 1998.1998 and beyond, measured against 1996 results. The initiative is based on the Company's conclusion that the current level of performance of its existing facilities and businesses willwould not achieve the level of profits the Company considers satisfactory based upon historic long-term average prices for primary aluminum and alumina. During the second quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a $19.7 million restructuring charge to reflect actions taken and plans put in placeinitiated to achieve the reduced production costs, decreased corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, and enhanced product mix intended to achieve this goal. The significant components of the restructuring charge are discussed inSee Note 7 of the Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. RECENT EVENTS During June 1997, Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of KACC,the Company, completed the acquisition of Reynolds Metals Company's Bellwood, Virginia, extrusion plant and its existing inventories for a total purchase price of $44.1 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments.$41.6 million. See Note 8 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. During August 1997, the 8,673,850 outstanding shares of PRIDES were converted into 7,227,848 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the PRIDES Certificate of Designations. The Company currently anticipates that the Volta River Authority may partially reduce its electric power allocation to the Company's 90% owned Volta Aluminium Company Limited ("Valco") smelter facility in Ghana in 1998. Informal discussions with local officials suggest that regional rainfall has been insufficient to raise the level of the lake, from which the facility receives its hydroelectric power, to maintain the current level of power for the coming year. Formal notice of Valco's 1998 power allocation is expected on or about November 15, 1997. Meetings are planned with local officials for early November to discuss the situation. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The table on the following page provides selected operational and financial information on a consolidated basis with respect to the Company for the quarters and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, and 1996. As an integrated aluminum producer, the Company uses a portion of its bauxite, alumina, and primary aluminum production for additional processing at certain of its other facilities. Intracompany shipments and sales are excluded from the information set forth on the following page. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of those for a full year. SELECTED OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars, except shipments and prices)
Quarter Ended SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, JuneSeptember 30, ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1997 1996 1997 1996 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Shipments: (1) Alumina 492.3 431.9 877.8 908.1579.2 598.6 1,457.0 1,506.7 Aluminum products: Primary aluminum 82.0 100.0 160.5 174.886.4 88.1 246.9 262.9 Fabricated aluminum products 100.4 85.1 194.3 162.3105.2 83.1 299.5 245.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total aluminum products 182.4 185.1 354.8 337.1191.6 171.2 546.4 508.3 ============================== ============================== Average realized sales price: Alumina (per ton) $ 200 $ 187 $ 196 $ 207 $ 193 $ 208199 Primary aluminum (per pound) .76 .67 .75 .69 .75 .71 Net sales: Bauxite and alumina: Alumina $ 96.5115.9 $ 89.5111.7 $ 169.7285.6 $ 188.5300.2 Other (2) (3) 26.5 27.0 53.1 51.427.1 25.8 80.2 77.2 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total bauxite and alumina 123.0 116.5 222.8 239.9143.0 137.5 365.8 377.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Aluminum processing: Primary aluminum 135.3 153.1 264.5 272.2145.0 130.6 409.5 402.8 Fabricated aluminum products 334.5 294.1 648.9 579.0341.7 282.4 990.6 861.4 Other (3) 4.3 3.9 8.3 7.64.4 2.9 12.7 10.5 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total aluminum processing 474.1 451.1 921.7 858.8491.1 415.9 1,412.8 1,274.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total net sales $ 597.1634.1 $ 567.6553.4 $ 1,144.51,778.6 $ 1,098.71,652.1 ============================== ============================== Operating income (loss): Bauxite and alumina $ 7.58.8 $ 1.1(2.1) $ 6.014.8 $ 10.98.8 Aluminum processing (4) 46.2 50.2 97.5 98.764.1 29.1 161.6 127.8 Corporate (5) (18.4) (14.7) (36.9) (32.7)(16.5) (55.3) (49.2) ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Total operating income $ 35.354.5 $ 36.610.5 $ 66.6121.1 $ 76.987.4 ============================== ============================== Net income (loss) $ 13.717.5 $ 8.2(6.6) $ 16.333.8 $ 18.111.5 ============================== ============================== Capital expenditures: Property, plant, and equipmentexpenditures $ 47.025.9 $ 31.939.2 $ 68.894.7 $ 51.9 ==============================91.1 ============================== ==============================
[FN] - --------------------------------- (1) In thousands of metric tons. (2) Includes net sales of bauxite. (3) Includes the portion of net sales attributable to minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries. (4) Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 includes a pre-tax charge of $15.1 related to restructuring of operations recorded in consolidated subsidiaries. (4) Includes a pre-tax charge of $15.1 related to restructuring of operations for both the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 1997. (5) Includes a pre-tax charge of $4.6 related to restructuring of operations for both the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 1997. (5) Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 includes a pre-tax charge of $4.6 related to restructuring of operations recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 1997. OVERVIEW The Company's operating results are sensitive to changes in prices of alumina, primary aluminum, and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to a significant degree on the volume and mix of all products sold and on KACC's hedging strategies. Primary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant cyclical fluctuations. Alumina prices as well as fabricated aluminum product prices (which vary considerably among products) are significantly influenced by changes in the price of primary aluminum but generally lag behind primary aluminum price changes by up to three months. During the first halfnine months of 1996,1997, the Average Midwest United States transaction price ("AMT Price") for primary aluminum remained relatively stable generally in the $.75 - $.80 per pound range. The AMT Price for primary aluminum for the week ended October 31, 1997, was approximately $.77 per pound. This compares favorably to 1996 when the AMT Price remained fairly stable generally in the $.70 - $.75 per pound range. Duringrange through June and then declined during the second half of the year, the AMT Price for primary aluminum fell, reaching a low of approximately $.65 per pound for October 1996, before recovering late in the year. During the period 1993- June 30, 1997, the AMT Price for primary aluminum ranged from approximately $.50 to $1.00 per pound. The AMT Price for primary aluminum for the week ended July 25, 1997, was approximately $.78 per pound. See Note 6 of the Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of KACC's hedging activities. QUARTER AND SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 1997, COMPARED TO QUARTER AND SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 1996 SUMMARY The Company reported net income of $13.7$17.5 million, or $.16$.22 per common and common equivalent share, for the secondthird quarter of 1997, compared to a net incomeloss of $8.2$6.6 million, or $.09$.12 per common and common equivalent share, for the same period of 1996. Net sales in the secondthird quarter of 1997 totaled $597.1$634.1 million compared to $567.6$553.4 million in the secondthird quarter of 1996. For the six-monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, net income was $16.3$33.8 million, or $.17$.39 per common and common equivalent share compared to net income of $18.1$11.5 million, or $.19$.07 per common and common equivalent per share for the six-monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1996. Net sales for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, were $1,144.5$1,778.6 million compared to $1,098.7$1,652.1 million for the first sixnine months of 1996. Results for the quarter and six monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, include the effect of certain non-recurring items including a $19.7 million restructuring charge (discussed above), an approximate $12.5 million non- cash tax benefit related to settlement of certain matters and a $5.8 million charge related to additional litigation reserves. Excluding these items, net income for the quarter and six monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, would have been approximately $17.0$37.1 million, and $19.6 million, respectively, andprimary earnings per common and common equivalent share for these periodsthe period would have been approximately $.21 and $.22, respectively.$.43. BAUXITE AND ALUMINA Net sales of alumina increased by 8%4% for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, from the comparable period in the prior year, as a result of a 14%7% increase in alumina shipments offset by a 5% decline in average realized prices realized from the sale of alumina.alumina, offset by a 3% decline in alumina shipments. Shipment volumes were updown as compared to the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1996, primarily as a result of the timing of shipments. For the six monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, net segment sales declined by 7%,3% from the comparable period in the prior year. This change was due primarily to a 7%2% decrease in average realized prices between periods and to a lesser extent due to a 3% reduction in alumina shipments. Segment operating income improved substantially on a quarter to quarter basis but declined by 45%and, to a lesser extent, for the comparative sixnine month periods.periods as well. On a quarterly basis, the improvement resulted primarily from improvedimprovements in average realized prices and operating efficiencies and reduced raw material and energy prices. On a year-to-date basis, however, these amountsimprovements were not sufficient tosomewhat offset by the impact of reductions in both a reduction inthe average realized alumina pricesprice and alumina shipments as well as alumina shipments.discussed above. ALUMINUM PROCESSING Net sales of primary aluminum for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, decreasedincreased by 12%11% from the comparable prior year period as a result of a 18% decrease in shipments offset by an 8%13% increase in average realized prices. Theprices offset by a 2% decrease in primary aluminum shipments between periods is the result of the higher than usual shipments in the second quarter of 1996.shipments. Net sales of fabricated aluminum products for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, were up 14%21% as compared to the prior year period as a result of a 18%27% increase in shipments offset by a 4% decrease in average realized prices. The increase in fabricated aluminum product shipments over the secondthird quarter of 1996 was due tothe result of the Company's June 1997 acquisition of an extrusion facility in Bellwood, Virginia, as well as increased international sales of can sheet and increased shipments of heat-treatedheat- treated products. For the six monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, net sales for the aluminum processing segment increased by approximately 7%11% from the comparable prior year period primarily as a 12%result of a 15% increase in fabricated aluminum product net sales more than offset a 3% decline in net sales of primary aluminum.sales. The increase in fabricated product net sales, and offsetting decrease in primary aluminum net sales resulted from the same shipment and price factors discussed in the preceding paragraph. Net sales of primary aluminum for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1997, were basically flat as compared to the prior year as reduced shipments for the period were offset by an increase in the average realized price. In addition to being affected by the price and volume factors discussed above, the Aluminum Processingaluminum processing segment's operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 1997, also benefited from reduced power, raw material and supply costs as well as improved operating efficiencies. In addition, the segment's operating income for the quarter and sixnine month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, includes approximately $2.3$2.7 million and $5.2$7.5 million of operating income realized during the periods, related to the settlement of certain issues related to energy service contracts andcontracts. Operating income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1997, also includes a $15.1 million second quarter charge resulting from the previously discussed restructuring of operations. CORPORATE Corporate operating expenses represent corporate general and administrative expenses, which are not allocated to the Company's business segments. Operating results for the quarter and six monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, both includeincludes a pre-tax charge of approximately $4.6 million associated with the Company's restructuring of operations. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES CAPITAL STRUCTURE MAXXAM Inc. ("MAXXAM") and MAXXAM Group Holdings Inc. ("MGHI"), a wholly owned subsidiary of MAXXAM, collectively own approximately 62%63% of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, assuming the conversion of each outstanding share of the Company's 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred Stock (the "PRIDES") into one share of the Company's Common Stock.share. The remaining approximately 38%37% of the Company's Common Stock is publicly held. MGHI has pledged 27,938,250 shares of the Company's Common Stock beneficially owned by it (the "Pledged Shares") as security for $225.7 million of debt securities of one of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Additionally, MGHI has agreed to pledge up to 16,055,000 of such Pledged Shares as security for $130.0 million of its debt securities should the security pledge related to the $225.7 million of debt securities be released due to an early retirement of the related debt (other than by a refinancing). The Company has an effective "shelf" registration statement covering the offering of up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock that are owned by MAXXAM. Any such offering would only be made by means of a prospectus. The Company will not receive any of the net proceeds from any transaction initiated by MAXXAM pursuant to this registration statement. The Company also has an effective shelf"shelf" registration statement covering the offering from time to time of up to $150.0 million of equity securities. Any such offering will only be made by means of a prospectus. On December 31, 1997, unless either previously redeemed by the Company or converted at the option of the holder, each of the outstanding shares of PRIDES will mandatorily convert into one share of the Company's Common Stock, subject to adjustment in certain events. The Credit Agreement does not permit the Company or KACC to pay any dividends on their Commoncommon stock. The declaration and payment of dividends by the Company with respect to the outstanding PRIDES is expressly permitted by the terms of the Credit Agreement to the extent the Company receives payments on certain intercompany notes or certain other permitted distributions from KACC. OPERATING ACTIVITIES At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the Company had working capital of $457.3$469.8 million, compared with working capital of $414.3 million at December 31, 1996. The increase in working capital was due primarily to an increase in Receivables and a decrease in Accounts payable partially offset by a decrease in Cash and cash equivalents. INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital expenditures during the quarter and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, were $47.0$25.9 million and $68.8$94.7 million, respectively, and were used primarily to acquire the Bellwood extrusion facility from Reynolds, improve production efficiency, reduce operating costs, expand capacity at existing facilities, and construct new facilities. The Company's first Micromill(TM) facility, which was constructed in Nevada during 1996 as a demonstration and production facility, achieved operational start-up by year-end 1996. The facility remained in a start-up mode during the first halfnine months of 1997 as the Company continued its efforts to implement the Micromill(TM) technology on a full scale basis. While the Micromill(TM) technology has not yet been fully implemented or commercialized, and isno assurances can be given that the Company will ultimately be successful in this regards, the Company currently expectedexpects to commence limited product shipments to customers in the latter partfourth quarter of the year.1997. Total consolidated capital expenditures (of which approximately 7% is expected to be funded by the Company's minority partners in certain foreign joint ventures) are expected to be between $70.0 and $140.0 million per annum in each of 1997 through 1999. Management continues to evaluate numerous projects, all of which require substantial capital, including the Company's Micromill(TM)Micromill project, and other potential opportunities both in the United States and overseas. Kaiser Yellow River Investment Limited ("KYRIL"),Subsequent to September 30, 1997, a joint decision was made by a KACC subsidiary and its joint venture partner to terminate and dissolve the Sino-foreign aluminum joint venture in which the subsidiary had invested approximately $9.0 million in 1995. Under the terms of the Company,joint venture agreement and Chinese law, a distribution of the joint venture's net assets is a participantto be made to each of the parties in Yellow River Aluminum Industry Company Limited, a Sino-foreign joint equity enterprise (the "Joint Venture") organized underrespect of their individual ownership interests. The amount that will ultimately be received upon dissolution and the lawsassociated terms of any payments are the subject of ongoing negotiations and is subject to certain governmental approvals by officials of the People's Republic of China ("PRC") along with the Lanzhou Aluminum Smelters ("LAS") of the China National Nonferrous Metals Industry Corporation ( the "CNNC"). The parties to the Joint Venture are currently engaged in discussions concerning the future of the Joint Venture. In a June 1997 meeting, representatives of the Company and the CNNC agreed to extend the Joint Venture termination date from June 30, 1997 to March 31, 1998. Negotiations between KYRIL, LAS and the CNNC continue to focus on a sale of KYRIL's interests to a third party or LAS and/or the CNNC making a payment to KYRIL in return for its existing interests in the Joint Venture. However, no agreement has been reached concerning the amount of or terms for any such payments. Governmental approval in the PRC will be necessary in order to implement any arrangements agreed to by the parties, and there can be no assurance such approval will be obtained.China. FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND LIQUIDITY At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the Company had long-term debt of $1,005.4$972.0 million, compared with $961.9 million at December 31, 1996. The change in long-term debt between periods is primarily the result of $30.0 million of borrowings under the Credit Agreement and $19.0 million of proceeds from the Spokane County, Washington, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, which were loaned to KACC to finance certain qualifying capital expenditures at its Mead smelter.smelter, offset by scheduled payments of the current portion of long-term debt. At JuneSeptember 30, 1997, $243.8$273.8 million (of which $73.8 million could have been used for letters of credit) was available to KACC under the Credit Agreement. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a spread (which varies based on the results of a financial test) over either a base rate or LIBOR at the Company's option. During the quarter and sixnine month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the average per annum interest rates on loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement were approximately 9.5%9.0% and 9.6%9.5%, respectively. During the quarter ended June 30, 1997, the Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the formation of the wheel manufacturing joint venture and the acquisition of the Bellwood facility. Additionally, uponUpon completion of the acquisition of the Bellwood facility, Kaiser Bellwood Corporation became a subsidiary guarantor under the indentures in respect of KACC's 9-7/8% Senior Notes due 2002, 10-7/8% Series B and Series D Senior Notes due 2006, and 12-3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2003. Management believes that the Company's existing cash resources, together with cash flows from operations and borrowings under the Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next year. Additionally, with respect to long-term liquidity, management believes that operating cash flow, together with the ability to obtain both short and long-term financing, should provide sufficient funds to meet the Company's working capital and capital expenditure requirements. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ----------------- CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND JAMES L FERRY & SON INC. On July 28, 1997, KACC and Catellus Development Corporation ("Catellus") entered into a settlement agreement and release settling all matters pending between the parties in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. All matters relating to the litigation have now been resolved. KACC will remain liable to the City of Richmond for fifty percent (50%) of future costs of cleaning up certain parts of the property formerly owned by Catellus in accordance with the final judgement issued by the United States District Court. KACC's share of these costs is expected to be less than $500,000. See Part I, Item 3. "LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Catellus Development Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and James L Ferry & Son Inc." in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. ASBESTOS-RELATED LITIGATIONAsbestos-related Litigation KACC is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims of multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that certain of their injuries were caused by, among other things, exposure to asbestos during, and as a result of, their employment or association with KACC or exposure to products containing asbestos produced or sold by KACC. The portion of Note 5 of the Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report under the heading "Asbestos Contingencies" is incorporated herein by reference. See Part I, Item 3. "LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Asbestos-related Litigation" in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS --------------------------------------------------- The annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on May 22, 1997, at which meeting the stockholders voted to elect management's slate of nominees as directors of the Company and approved the Kaiser 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. The results of the matters voted on at the meeting are shown below. NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR The nominees for election as directors of the Company are listed below, together with the number of votes cast for, against, and withheld with respect to each such nominee, as well as the number of abstentions and broker nonvotes with respect to each such nominee: Robert J. Cruikshank Votes For: 72,115,783.6 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 288,496.6 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: George T. Haymaker, Jr. Votes For: 72,120,441.0 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 283,838.2 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: Charles E. Hurwitz Votes For: 72,117,337.0 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 286,942.2 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: Ezra G. Levin Votes For: 72,107,306.6 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 296,972.6 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: Robert Marcus Votes For: 72,117,821.6 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 286,457.6 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: Robert J. Petris Votes For: 72,108,863.6 Votes Against: Votes Withheld: 295,415.6 Abstentions: Broker Nonvotes: KAISER 1997 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN The vote with respect to the proposal to approve the Kaiser 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was as follows: Votes For: 62,106,584.8 Votes Against: 5,262,937.8 Votes Withheld: Abstentions: 91,860.2 Broker Nonvotes ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K -------------------------------- (a) Exhibits. Exhibit No. Exhibit ----------- ------- 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the "Company" or "KAC"), dated February 21, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated June 11, 1991, filed by KAC, Registration No. 33-37895). 3.2 Certificate of Retirement of KAC, dated October 24, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447). *3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws of KAC, dated July 22,October 1, 1997. *4.1 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1997, among Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation ("KACC"), as Issuer, Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill Holdings, LLC,*4.7 Eleventh Amendment to Credit Agreement and Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993, regarding KACC's 12-3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2003. *4.2 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1997, among KACC, as Issuer, Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill Holdings, LLC, and Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of February 17, 1994, regarding KACC's 9-7/8% Senior Notes due 2002. *4.3 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1997, among KACC, as Issuer, Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, and Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Indenture,Limited Waivers, dated as of October 23, 1996, regarding KACC's 10-7/8% Series B Senior Notes due 2006. *4.4 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1997, among KACC, as Issuer, Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, and Kaiser Bellwood Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of December 23, 1996, regarding KACC's 10-7/8% Series D Senior Notes due 2006. *4.5 Ninth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of April 21, 1997, amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as amended, among KACC, KAC, the financial institutions a party thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent. *4.6 Tenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 25,20, 1997, amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as amended, among KACC, KAC, the financial institutions a party thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent. *27 Financial Data Schedule. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reportA Current Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company during(under Item 5.) on August 15, 1997, announcing the quarter ended June 30, 1997.Company's intention to redeem its 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.05 per share ("PRIDES"), on August 29, 1997, pursuant to the PRIDES Certificate of Designations. - --------------- * Filed herewith SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, who have signed this report on behalf of the registrant as the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the registrant, respectively. KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION /s/ John T. La Duc By: ------------------------------------------------------ John T. La Duc Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) /s/Arthur S. Donaldson Daniel D. Maddox By: -------------------------- Arthur S. Donaldson---------------------------- Daniel D. Maddox Controller - Corporate Consolidation and Reporting (Principal Accounting Officer) Dated: August 1,November 5, 1997