UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018


o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: ~~0-17089~~001-35070

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Commonwealth of Massachusetts	04-2976299
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Ten Post Office Square Boston, Massachusetts	02109
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 912-1900

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of November ~~3, 2017~~2, 2018:



Common Stock, Par Value $1.00 Per Share	~~84,240,520~~84,377,380
(class)	(outstanding)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4652
	Executive Summary	4753
	Critical Accounting Policies	4854
	Results of Operations	4855
	Financial Condition	5663
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Discussion	5663
	Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality	5966
	Liquidity	6471
	Capital Resources	6674
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements	6876
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	6876
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	6876
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	7077
Item 1A	Risk Factors	7077
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	7077
Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	7177
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	7177
Item 5	Other Information	7177
Item 6	Exhibits	7178
	Signature Page	7279
	Certifications

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)						BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)						(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	110,440		$	106,557		$	92,634		$	120,541
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,196,635 and $1,283,161 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	1,189,827			1,264,132
Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $83,878 and $92,604 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	84,090			93,079
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,101,756 and $1,182,427 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)							1,063,340			1,170,328
Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $72,927 and $73,781 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)							75,468			74,576
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank	61,714			44,077			48,727			59,973
Loans held for sale	1,957			3,464			3,344			4,697
Total loans	6,413,201			6,114,354			6,720,420			6,505,028
Less: Allowance for loan losses	74,873			78,077			73,500			74,742
Net loans	6,338,328			6,036,277			6,646,920			6,430,286
Other real estate owned (“OREO”)	—			1,690			108			—
Premises and equipment, net	36,546			31,827			47,399			37,640
Goodwill	142,554			142,554			75,598			75,598
Intangible assets, net	22,447			26,725			13,834			16,083
Fees receivable	12,560			13,400			10,445			11,154
Accrued interest receivable	21,823			20,479			24,641			22,322
Deferred income taxes, net	46,088			55,460			27,833			29,031
Other assets	201,024			130,753			245,549			259,515
Total assets	$	8,269,398		$	7,970,474		$	8,375,840		$	8,311,744
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	6,262,347		$	6,085,146		$	6,768,723		$	6,510,246
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	59,903			59,624			39,453			32,169
Federal funds purchased	70,000			80,000			120,000			30,000
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	812,773			734,205			441,836			693,681
Junior subordinated debentures	106,363			106,363			106,363			106,363
Other liabilities	127,069			119,683			149,770			135,880
Total liabilities	7,438,455			7,185,021			7,626,145			7,508,339
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests	15,882			16,972			11,686			17,461
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 2,000,000 shares; Series D, 6.95% Non-Cumulative Perpetual, issued and outstanding: 50,000 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; liquidation preference: $1,000 per share	47,753			47,753
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 170,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 84,082,250 shares at September 30, 2017 and 83,731,769 shares at December 31, 2016	84,082			83,732
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 2,000,000 shares; Series D, 6.95% Non-Cumulative Perpetual, issued and outstanding: zero shares at September 30, 2018 and 50,000 shares at December 31, 2017; liquidation preference: $1,000 per share							—			47,753
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 170,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 84,602,519 shares at September 30, 2018 and 84,208,538 shares at December 31, 2017							84,603			84,208
Additional paid-in capital	606,802			597,454			614,157			607,929
Retained earnings	76,455			47,929			64,618			49,526
Accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss)	(4,823		)	(12,548		)	(27,578		)	(8,658		)
Total Company’s shareholders’ equity	810,269			764,320			735,800			780,758
Noncontrolling interests	4,792			4,161			2,209			5,186
Total shareholders’ equity	815,061			768,481			738,009			785,944
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity	$	8,269,398		$	7,970,474		$	8,375,840		$	8,311,744

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)												BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)												(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans	$	58,096		$	50,074		$	169,468		$	149,851		$	68,254		$	58,096		$	193,231		$	169,468
Taxable investment securities	1,569			1,537			4,831			4,638			1,510			1,569			4,521			4,831
Non-taxable investment securities	1,664			1,444			4,925			4,234			1,779			1,664			5,261			4,925
Mortgage-backed securities	3,267			3,079			10,266			9,126			2,941			3,267			9,168			10,266
Federal funds sold and other	916			469			2,347			1,381
Short-term investments and other													1,617			916			3,831			2,347
Total interest and dividend income	65,512			56,603			191,837			169,230			76,101			65,512			216,012			191,837
Interest expense:
Deposits	5,356			4,163			14,836			12,420			11,487			5,356			26,376			14,836
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	2,657			1,929			7,257			6,021			3,877			2,657			11,668			7,257
Junior subordinated debentures	761			591			2,148			1,753			1,028			761			2,882			2,148
Repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings	111			49			182			117			68			111			517			182
Total interest expense	8,885			6,732			24,423			20,311			16,460			8,885			41,443			24,423
Net interest income	56,627			49,871			167,414			148,919			59,641			56,627			174,569			167,414
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(432		)	(138		)	(6,727		)	(5,806		)	(949		)	(432		)	(2,291		)	(6,727		)
Net interest income after provision/ (credit) for loan losses	57,059			50,009			174,141			154,725			60,590			57,059			176,860			174,141
Fees and other income:
Investment management fees	11,274			10,717			33,194			32,002			3,245			11,274			18,897			33,194
Wealth advisory fees	13,279			12,750			39,063			38,013			13,995			13,279			41,200			39,063
Wealth management and trust fees	11,619			10,826			33,606			32,950			11,510			11,619			34,830			33,606
Other banking fee income	2,726			3,447			6,384			9,662			2,775			2,726			7,793			6,384
Gain on sale of loans, net	169			156			366			562			67			169			204			366
Gain/ (loss) on sale of investments, net	230			273			486			519			—			230			(17		)	486
Gain/ (loss) on OREO, net	—			137			(46		)	417			—			—			—			(46		)
Other	970			1,706			1,738			704			722			970			1,245			1,738
Total fees and other income	40,267			40,012			114,791			114,829			32,314			40,267			104,152			114,791
Operating expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	45,168			40,924			134,486			124,098			38,944			44,912			125,461			133,889
Occupancy and equipment	11,283			9,521			32,711			29,036			8,164			7,944			24,141			22,412
Professional services	3,308			2,290			9,728			8,820			2,877			3,308			8,926			9,728
Marketing and business development	2,216			1,623			5,847			5,604			1,710			2,216			5,373			5,847
Contract services and data processing	1,608			1,865			4,829			5,281
Information systems													6,233			5,282			18,889			16,161
Amortization of intangibles	1,426			1,568			4,278			4,740			750			1,426			2,249			4,278
FDIC insurance	647			722			2,292			2,757			674			647			2,126			2,292
Restructuring	—			—			—			2,017			5,763			—			5,763			—
Other	3,690			3,157			11,776			10,757			3,442			3,611			10,870			11,340
Total operating expense	69,346			61,670			205,947			193,110			68,557			69,346			203,798			205,947
Income before income taxes	27,980			28,351			82,985			76,444			24,347			27,980			77,214			82,985
Income tax expense	8,289			8,652			24,805			23,716			5,461			8,289			28,886			24,805
Net income from continuing operations	19,691			19,699			58,180			52,728			18,886			19,691			48,328			58,180
Net income from discontinued operations	1,186			1,047			3,881			4,357			—			1,186			1,696			3,881
Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests	20,877			20,746			62,061			57,085			18,886			20,877			50,024			62,061
(Continued)


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)												BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	1,074			1,110			3,190			3,010			924			1,074			2,942			3,190
Net income attributable to the Company	$	19,803		$	19,636		$	58,871		$	54,075		$	17,962		$	19,803		$	47,082		$	58,871
Adjustments to net income attributable to the Company to arrive at net income attributable to common shareholders	$	(1,146	)	$	(1,006	)	$	(2,889	)	$	(2,265	)	$	(829	)	$	(1,146	)	$	(4,376	)	$	(2,889	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders for earnings per share calculation	$	18,657		$	18,630		$	55,982		$	51,810		$	17,133		$	18,657		$	42,706		$	55,982
Basic earnings per share attributable to common shareholders:
From continuing operations:	$	0.21		$	0.22		$	0.63		$	0.58		$	0.20		$	0.21		$	0.49		$	0.63
From discontinued operations:	$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.05		$	0.05		$	—		$	0.01		$	0.02		$	0.05
Total attributable to common shareholders:	$	0.23		$	0.23		$	0.68		$	0.64		$	0.20		$	0.23		$	0.51		$	0.68
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	82,556,225			81,301,499			82,270,849			81,280,014			84,017,284			82,556,225			83,544,754			82,270,849
Diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders:
From continuing operations:	$	0.21		$	0.21		$	0.61		$	0.57		$	0.20		$	0.21		$	0.48		$	0.61
From discontinued operations:	$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.05		$	0.05		$	—		$	0.01		$	0.02		$	0.05
Total attributable to common shareholders:	$	0.22		$	0.22		$	0.66		$	0.62		$	0.20		$	0.22		$	0.50		$	0.66
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding	84,888,311			83,562,283			84,741,172			83,430,480			85,498,568			84,888,311			85,254,295			84,741,172

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)												BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Net income attributable to the Company	$	19,803		$	19,636		$	58,871		$	54,075		$	17,962		$	19,803		$	47,082		$	58,871
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available-for-sale	1,114			(2,976		)	7,588			12,322			(4,040		)	1,114			(18,888		)	7,588
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gain)/ loss included in net income	(141		)	(172		)	(293		)	(330		)	—			(141		)	—			(293		)
Net unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available-for-sale	973			(3,148		)	7,295			11,992			(4,040		)	973			(18,888		)	7,295
Unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges	70			379			(140		)	(1,119		)	(138		)	70			574			(140		)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gain)/ loss included in net income	172			249			558			761			(72		)	172			(273		)	558
Net unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges	242			628			418			(358		)	(210		)	242			301			418
Net unrealized gain/ (loss) on other	—			—			12			—			—			—			1			12
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net of tax	1,215			(2,520		)	7,725			11,634			(4,250		)	1,215			(18,586		)	7,725
Total comprehensive income attributable to the Company, net	$	21,018		$	17,116		$	66,596		$	65,709		$	13,712		$	21,018		$	28,496		$	66,596

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)																			BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss)			Non- controlling Interests		Total			Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss)			Non- controlling Interests			Total
	(In thousands, except share data)
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	47,753	$	83,411		$	600,670		$	12,886		$	(1,500	)	$	3,393	$	746,613
Net income attributable to the Company	—		—			—			54,075			—			—		54,075
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	—		—			—			—			11,634			—		11,634
Dividends paid to common shareholders: $0.30 per share	—		—			—			(24,940		)	—			—		(24,940		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders	—		—			—			(2,606		)	—			—		(2,606		)
Net change in noncontrolling interests	—		—			—			—			—			389		389
Repurchase of 684,442 shares of common stock	—		(684		)	(7,336		)	—			—			—		(8,020		)
Net proceeds from issuance of:
165,934 shares of common stock	—		166			1,413			—			—			—		1,579
591,234 shares of incentive stock grants, net of 326,834 shares canceled or forfeited and 63,235 shares withheld for employee taxes	—		201			(939		)	—			—			—		(738		)
Amortization of stock compensation and employee stock purchase plan	—		—			2,186			—			—			—		2,186
Stock options exercised	—		101			688			—			—			—		789
Tax benefit/ (deficiency) from certain stock compensation awards	—		—			(728		)	—			—			—		(728		)
Other equity adjustments	—		—			1,255			—			—			—		1,255
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	47,753	$	83,195		$	597,209		$	39,415		$	10,134		$	3,782	$	781,488
																				(In thousands, except share data)
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	47,753	$	83,732		$	597,454		$	47,929		$	(12,548	)	$	4,161	$	768,481		$	47,753		$	83,732		$	597,454		$	47,929		$	(12,548	)	$	4,161		$	768,481
Net income attributable to the Company	—		—			—			58,871			—			—		58,871			—			—			—			58,871			—			—			58,871
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	—		—			—			—			7,725			—		7,725			—			—			—			—			7,725			—			7,725
Dividends paid to common shareholders: $0.33 per share	—		—			—			(27,739		)	—			—		(27,739		)	—			—			—			(27,739		)	—			—			(27,739		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders	—		—			—			(2,606		)	—			—		(2,606		)	—			—			—			(2,606		)	—			—			(2,606		)
Net change in noncontrolling interests	—		—			—			—			—			631		631			—			—			—			—			—			631			631
Net proceeds from issuance of:
140,284 shares of common stock	—		140			1,461			—			—			—		1,601			—			140			1,461			—			—			—			1,601
90,848 incentive stock grant shares canceled or forfeited and 62,087 shares withheld for employee taxes	—		(153		)	(816		)	—			—			—		(969		)	—			(153		)	(816		)	—			—			—			(969		)
Exercise of warrants	—		261			1,618			—			—			—		1,879			—			261			1,618			—			—			—			1,879
Amortization of stock compensation and employee stock purchase plan	—		—			6,183			—			—			—		6,183			—			—			6,183			—			—			—			6,183
Stock options exercised	—		102			725			—			—			—		827			—			102			725			—			—			—			827
Other equity adjustments	—		—			177			—			—			—		177			—			—			177			—			—			—			177
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	47,753	$	84,082		$	606,802		$	76,455		$	(4,823	)	$	4,792	$	815,061		$	47,753		$	84,082		$	606,802		$	76,455		$	(4,823	)	$	4,792		$	815,061

Balance, December 31, 2017																				$	47,753		$	84,208		$	607,929		$	49,526		$	(8,658	)	$	5,186		$	785,944
Reclassification due to change in accounting principles																				—			—			—			334			(334		)	—			—
Net income attributable to the Company																				—			—			—			47,082			—			—			47,082
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net																				—			—			—			—			(18,586		)	—			(18,586		)
Dividends paid to common shareholders: $0.36 per share																				—			—			—			(30,586		)	—			—			(30,586		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders																				—			—			—			(1,738		)	—			—			(1,738		)
Net change in noncontrolling interests																				—			—			—			—			—			(2,977		)	(2,977		)
Redemption of Series D preferred stock																				(47,753		)	—			(2,247		)	—			—			—			(50,000		)
Repurchase of 137,114 shares of common stock																				—			(137		)	(1,768		)	—			—			—			(1,905		)
Net proceeds from issuance of:
142,738 shares of common stock																				—			143			1,722			—			—			—			1,865
132,964 incentive stock grant shares canceled or forfeited and 127,894 shares withheld for employee taxes, net of 7,355 shares of incentive stock grants																				—			(253		)	(1,699		)	—			—			—			(1,952		)
Exercise of warrants																				—			438			(277		)	—			—			—			161
Amortization of stock compensation and employee stock purchase plan																				—			—			5,131			—			—			—			5,131
Stock options exercised																				—			204			1,457			—			—			—			1,661
Other equity adjustments																				—			—			3,909			—			—			—			3,909
Balance at September 30, 2018																				$	—		$	84,603		$	614,157		$	64,618		$	(27,578	)	$	2,209		$	738,009

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)						BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
	Nine months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income attributable to the Company	$	58,871		$	54,075		$	47,082		$	58,871
Adjustments to arrive at net income from continuing operations
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	3,190			3,010			2,942			3,190
Less: Net income from discontinued operations	(3,881		)	(4,357		)	(1,696		)	(3,881		)
Net income from continuing operations	58,180			52,728			48,328			58,180
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	15,835			16,997			17,192			15,835
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(3,190		)	(3,010		)	(2,942		)	(3,190		)
Stock compensation, net of cancellations	6,183			2,186			5,232			6,183
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(6,727		)	(5,806		)	(2,291		)	(6,727		)
Loans originated for sale	(38,099		)	(61,768		)	(32,364		)	(38,099		)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	39,972			65,086			33,935			39,972
Deferred income tax expense/ (benefit)	4,141			3,721			8,548			4,141
Net decrease/ (increase) in other operating activities	(9,407		)	(2,134		)	(14,348		)	(9,407		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	66,888			68,000			61,290			66,888
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations	3,881			4,357			1,696			3,881
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities	70,769			72,357			62,986			70,769
Cash flows from investing activities:
Available-for-sale investment securities:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Purchases	(138,623		)	(323,271		)	(63,246		)	(138,623		)
Sales	119,238			41,961			51,781			119,238
Maturities, calls, redemptions, and principal payments	100,065			131,245			86,085			100,065
Held-to-maturity investment securities:
Investment securities held-to-maturity:
Purchases	(14,945		)	—			(11,876		)	(14,945		)
Maturities and principal payments	23,541			16,907
Principal payments							10,726			23,541
(Investments)/ distributions in trusts, net	(747		)	(539		)	1,252			(747		)
Purchase of additional Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”)	(50,000		)	—			—			(50,000		)
(Purchase)/ redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock	(17,637		)	(903		)	11,246			(17,637		)
Net (increase)/ decrease in portfolio loans	(298,304		)	(156,688		)
Net increase in portfolio loans							(217,317		)	(298,304		)
Proceeds from recoveries of loans previously charged-off	4,082			8,347			1,578			4,082
Proceeds from sale of OREO	1,644			1,337			—			1,644
Capital expenditures, net of sale proceeds	(10,769		)	(7,099		)	(18,349		)	(10,769		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	(282,455		)	(288,703		)
Proceeds from sale of affiliate							34,120			—
Net cash provided by/ (used in) investing activities	(282,455		)	(288,703		)	(114,000		)	(282,455		)
(Continued)


BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)						BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
	Nine months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase/ (decrease) in deposits	177,201			(122,406		)	258,477			177,201
Net increase/ (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	279			19,251			7,284			279
Net increase/ (decrease) in federal funds purchased	(10,000		)	125,000			90,000			(10,000		)
Net increase/ (decrease) in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	110,000			95,000			(230,000		)	110,000
Advances of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	50,110			67,179			91,444			50,110
Repayments of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	(81,542		)	(100,822		)	(113,289		)	(81,542		)
Redemption of Series D preferred stock							(50,000		)	—
Dividends paid to common shareholders	(27,739		)	(24,940		)	(30,586		)	(27,739		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders	(2,606		)	(2,606		)	(1,738		)	(2,606		)
Proceeds from warrant exercises	1,879			—			161			1,879
Repurchase of common stock	—			(8,020		)	(1,905		)	—
Tax benefit/ (deficiency) from certain stock compensation awards	—			(728		)
Proceeds from stock option exercises	827			789			1,661			827
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	632			841
Proceeds from issuance of common stock							1,865			1,601
Tax withholding for share based compensation awards							(2,053		)	(969		)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests	(3,197		)	(2,905		)	(2,848		)	(3,197		)
Other equity adjustments	(275		)	(350		)	4,634			(275		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) financing activities of continuing operations	215,569			45,283
Net cash provided by/ (used in) financing activities	215,569			45,283			23,107			215,569
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	3,883			(171,063		)	(27,907		)	3,883
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	106,557			238,694			120,541			106,557
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	110,440		$	67,631		$	92,634		$	110,440
Supplementary schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Cash paid for interest	$	23,681		$	20,489		$	40,703		$	23,681
Cash paid for income taxes, (net of refunds received)	32,051			27,554			18,898			32,051
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	7,295			11,992			(18,888		)	7,295
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax	418			(358		)	301			418
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on other, net of tax	12			—			1			12
Non-cash transactions:
Loans transferred into other real estate owned from loan portfolio	—			1,944			108			—
Loans charged-off	(559		)	(3,372		)	(529		)	(559		)
Premises and equipment transferred into/ (out of) other assets held for sale	—			891
Deposits transferred into/ (out of) held for sale	—			105,788

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “BPFH”), is a bank holding company (the “Holding Company”) with four reportable segments: Private Banking, Wealth Management and Trust, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory.

The Private Banking segment is comprised of the banking operations of Boston Private Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank” or “Boston Private Bank”), a trust company chartered by The Commonwealth of Massachusetts whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. ~~On July 28, 2017,~~ Boston Private Bank ~~became~~is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Boston Private Bank ~~currently~~primarily operates in three geographic markets: New England, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Southern California.

The Wealth Management and Trust segment is comprised of the operations of Boston Private Wealth LLC (“Boston Private Wealth”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boston Private Bank, and the trust operations of Boston Private Bank. The segment offers investment management, wealth management, retirement plan advisory, family office, financial planning, and trust services to individuals, families, and institutions. The Wealth Management and Trust segment operates in New England; South Florida; California; and Madison, Wisconsin.

The Investment Management segment ~~has~~had two consolidated affiliates, ~~consisting of~~ Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co., LLC (“DGHM”) and Anchor Capital Advisors, LLC (“Anchor”) (together, the “Investment Managers”). included in its results for the first quarter of 2018. The assets and liabilities of Anchor were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Assets held for sale were $58.8 million at December 31, 2017, and liabilities held for sale were $3.2 million at December 31, 2017. In December 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Anchor in a transaction that would result in Anchor being majority-owned by members of its management team. The transaction closed in April 2018. The Investment Management segment results for the third quarter of 2018 include results from DGHM. The Investment Management segment results for the first nine months of 2018 include results from DGHM for the full period and results from Anchor for the portion of the period before the transaction was closed.

The Wealth Advisory segment has two consolidated affiliates, consisting of KLS Professional Advisors Group, LLC (“KLS”) and Bingham, Osborn & Scarborough, LLC (“BOS”) (together, the “Wealth Advisors” and, together with the Wealth Management and Trust, and Investment Management segments, the “Wealth and Investment businesses”). On October 17, 2018, the Company announced an agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in BOS in a transaction that will result in BOS being majority-owned by members of its management team. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2018. Completion of the transaction is subject to obtaining client consents, as well as satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. As a result, the assets and liabilities of BOS will be classified as held for sale from October 17, 2018 through the date the transaction closes. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 15: Subsequent Event” for further details.

The Company conducts substantially all of its business through its four reportable segments. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), and include all necessary adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are required for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. The interim results of consolidated operations are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.

The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Prior period amounts are reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current period presentation.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~,2017, as filed with the SEC. For interim reporting purposes, the Company follows the same significant accounting policies, except for the following new accounting pronouncements from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) that were adopted effective January 1, ~~2017,~~ 2018:

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~2016-09,~~2017-12, ~~Stock Compensation~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic ~~718)~~815): Targeted Improvements to ~~Employee Share-Based Payment~~ Accounting for Hedging Activities(“ (“ASU ~~2016-09”), and ASU 2017-04,~~ ~~Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment~~ ~~(“ASU 2017-04”~~2017-12”). ~~ASU 2016-09 had no cumulative effect~~As a result of implementing this standard, the Company reclassified $5 thousand in unrealized losses on ~~prior periods, and for cash flow purposes the provisions were adopted prospectively. The Company elected~~derivatives related to ~~early adopt ASU 2017-04~~hedge ineffectiveness from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. This ASU will provide more flexibility in the Company’s risk management activities and we believe it will enhance the Company’s ability to employ risk management strategies, while improving the transparency and understanding of those strategies for financial statement users.

ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). This amendment requires an employer to report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. As a result of the retrospective adoption of this ASU, $256 thousand and $597 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, have been reclassified from salaries and employee benefits expense to other expense within the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, $131 thousand and $411 thousand, respectively, are presented within other expense that would have been presented within salaries and employee benefits prior to adoption of ASU ~~2017-04 could increase or decrease~~2017-07.

ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-15”). This update is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the ~~amount~~statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The guidance requires application using a ~~goodwill impairment charge should any of~~retrospective transition method. This ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s ~~reporting units~~consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). This amendment requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with ~~goodwill fail~~changes in fair value, net of tax, recognized in net income. As a ~~Step~~result of implementing this standard, the Company reclassified $339 thousand in unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity investments, net of tax, from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as of January 1, ~~test in~~2018. Additionally, this amendment requires that entities use the ~~future, as compared to the amount of a goodwill impairment charge under the existing standards depending on~~exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. As a result of implementing this standard, the ~~reporting unit’s assets.~~Company’s updated process includes identifying a fair value for loans using the exit price notion. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 5: Fair Value Measurements” for further details.

ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which was subsequently amended by additional ASUs, including ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, collectively, “ASU 2014-09 et al.” ASU 2014-09 et al. was adopted using the modified retrospective transition method as of January 1, 2018, however no cumulative effect adjustment was required. This new guidance was applied to all revenue contracts in place at the date of adoption. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 13: Revenue Recognition” for further details.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

2. Earnings Per Share

The treasury stock method of calculating earnings per share (“EPS”) is presented below for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017. The following tables present the computations of basic and diluted EPS:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
													(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share - Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations	$	19,691		$	19,699		$	58,180		$	52,728		$	18,886		$	19,691		$	48,328		$	58,180
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	1,074			1,110			3,190			3,010			924			1,074			2,942			3,190
Net income from continuing operations attributable to the Company	18,617			18,589			54,990			49,718			17,962			18,617			45,386			54,990
Decrease/ (increase) in noncontrolling interests’ redemption values (1)	(278		)	(138		)	(283		)	341			(829		)	(278		)	(391		)	(283		)
Dividends on preferred stock(2)	(868		)	(868		)	(2,606		)	(2,606		)	—			(868		)	(3,985		)	(2,606		)
Total adjustments to income attributable to common shareholders	(1,146		)	(1,006		)	(2,889		)	(2,265		)	(829		)	(1,146		)	(4,376		)	(2,889		)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, treasury stock method	17,471			17,583			52,101			47,453			17,133			17,471			41,010			52,101
Net income from discontinued operations	1,186			1,047			3,881			4,357			—			1,186			1,696			3,881
Net income attributable to common shareholders, treasury stock method	$	18,657		$	18,630		$	55,982		$	51,810		$	17,133		$	18,657		$	42,706		$	55,982

Basic earnings per share - Denominator:
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	82,556,225			81,301,499			82,270,849			81,280,014			84,017,284			82,556,225			83,544,754			82,270,849
Per share data - Basic earnings per share from:
Continuing operations	$	0.21		$	0.22		$	0.63		$	0.58		$	0.20		$	0.21		$	0.49		$	0.63
Discontinued operations	$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.05		$	0.05		$	—		$	0.01		$	0.02		$	0.05
Total attributable to common shareholders	$	0.23		$	0.23		$	0.68		$	0.64		$	0.20		$	0.23		$	0.51		$	0.68

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Diluted earnings per share - Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution $ 17,471
$ 17,583
$ 52,101
$ 47,453
Net income from discontinued operations 1,186
1,047
3,881
4,357
Net income attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution $ 18,657
$ 18,630
$ 55,982
$ 51,810
Diluted earnings per share - Denominator:
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding 82,556,225
81,301,499
82,270,849
81,280,014
Dilutive effect of:
Stock options, performance-based and time-based restricted stock, and performance-based and time-based restricted stock units, and other dilutive securities (2) 1,233,888
956,446
1,333,830
959,917
Warrants to purchase common stock (2) 1,098,198
1,304,338
1,136,493
1,190,549
Dilutive common shares 2,332,086
2,260,784
2,470,323
2,150,466
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (2) 84,888,311
83,562,283
84,741,172
83,430,480
Per share data - Diluted earnings per share from:
Continuing operations $ 0.21
$ 0.21
$ 0.61
$ 0.57
Discontinued operations $ 0.01
$ 0.01
$ 0.05
$ 0.05
Total attributable to common shareholders $ 0.22
$ 0.22
$ 0.66
$ 0.62
Dividends per share declared and paid on common stock $ 0.11
$ 0.10
$ 0.33
$ 0.30

~~_____________________~~

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Diluted earnings per share - Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution	$	17,133	$	17,471	$	41,010	$	52,101
Net income from discontinued operations	—		1,186		1,696		3,881
Net income attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution	$	17,133	$	18,657	$	42,706	$	55,982
Diluted earnings per share - Denominator:
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	84,017,284		82,556,225		83,544,754		82,270,849
Dilutive effect of:
Stock options, performance-based and time-based restricted stock, and performance-based and time-based restricted stock units, and other dilutive securities (3)	853,906		1,233,888		1,052,855		1,333,830
Warrants to purchase common stock (3)	627,378		1,098,198		656,686		1,136,493
Dilutive common shares	1,481,284		2,332,086		1,709,541		2,470,323
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (3)	85,498,568		84,888,311		85,254,295		84,741,172
Per share data - Diluted earnings per share from:
Continuing operations	$	0.20	$	0.21	$	0.48	$	0.61
Discontinued operations	$	—	$	0.01	$	0.02	$	0.05
Total attributable to common shareholders	$	0.20	$	0.22	$	0.50	$	0.66
Dividends per share declared and paid on common stock	$	0.12	$	0.11	$	0.36	$	0.33

_____________________

(1)

See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary ~~Data—~~Data - Note 14: Noncontrolling Interests” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 for a description of the redemption values related to the redeemable noncontrolling interests. In accordance with the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)~~FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), an increase in redemption value from period to period reduces income attributable to common shareholders. Decreases in redemption value from period to period increase income attributable to common shareholders, but only to the extent that the cumulative change in redemption value remains a cumulative increase since adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2009.


(2)	Consideration paid in excess of carrying value for the redemption of the 6.95% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D (“the Series D preferred stock”) of $2.2 million is considered a deemed dividend and, for purposes of calculating EPS, reduces net income attributable to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

(3)

The diluted EPS computations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 do not assume the conversion, exercise, or contingent issuance of the following shares for the following periods because the result would have been anti-dilutive for the periods indicated. As a result of the anti-dilution, the potential common shares excluded from the diluted EPS computation are as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,		Nine months ended September 30,		Three months ended September 30,		Nine months ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016	2018	2017	2018	2017
Shares excluded due to exercise price exceeding the average market price of common shares during the period (total outstanding):	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Potential common shares from:
Stock options	48	224	74	285	408	48	226	74
Total shares excluded due to exercise price exceeding the average market price of common shares during the period	48	224	74	285	408	48	226	74

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

3. Reportable segments

Management Reporting

The Company has four reportable segments (Private Banking, Wealth Management and Trust, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory), and the Holding Company (Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.). The financial performance of the Company is managed and evaluated by these ~~five areas, including the~~ four ~~reportable segments.~~areas. The segments are managed separately as a result of the concentrations in each function.

Measurement of Segment Profit and Assets

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Revenues, expenses, and assets are recorded by each segment, and separate financial statements are reviewed by their management and the Company’s segment chief executive officers.

Reconciliation of Reportable Segment Items

The following tables present a reconciliation of the revenues, profits, assets, and other significant items of reportable segments as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017. Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures is reported at the Holding Company.



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Private Banking	(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	60,551		$	57,295		$	177,129		$	169,334
Fees and other income	3,337			3,720			8,637			8,182
Total revenues	63,888			61,015			185,766			177,516
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(949		)	(432		)	(2,291		)	(6,727		)
Operating expense	44,706			38,482			124,003			110,444
Income before income taxes	20,131			22,965			64,054			73,799
Income tax expense	4,469			6,634			13,063			22,112
Net income from continuing operations	15,662			16,331			50,991			51,687
Net income attributable to the Company	$	15,662		$	16,331		$	50,991		$	51,687

Assets	$	8,292,901		$	8,113,836		$	8,292,901		$	8,113,836
Depreciation	$	2,398		$	1,431		$	6,013		$	4,145

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Private Banking (In thousands)
Net interest income $ 57,295
$ 50,419
$ 169,334
$ 150,553
Fees and other income 3,720
5,528
8,182
11,132
Total revenues 61,015
55,947
177,516
161,685
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses (432 ) (138 ) (6,727 ) (5,806 )
Operating expense 38,482
30,439
110,444
93,808
Income before income taxes 22,965
25,646
73,799
73,683
Income tax expense 6,634
8,226
22,112
23,638
Net income from continuing operations 16,331
17,420
51,687
50,045
Net income attributable to the Company $ 16,331
$ 17,420
$ 51,687
$ 50,045

Assets $ 8,113,836
$ 7,512,884
$ 8,113,836
$ 7,512,884
Depreciation $ 1,431
$ 1,094
$ 4,145
$ 3,365



	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2018		2017			2018		2017
Wealth Management and Trust	(In thousands)
Fees and other income	$	11,636	$	11,739		$	35,203	$	33,934
Operating expense	10,905		11,752			32,657		37,562
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	731		(13		)	2,546		(3,628		)
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	220		(125		)	729		(1,530		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	511		112			1,817		(2,098		)
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	511	$	112		$	1,817	$	(2,098	)

Assets	$	79,473	$	73,511		$	79,473	$	73,511
Amortization of intangibles	$	701	$	727		$	2,103	$	2,181
Depreciation	$	328	$	330		$	983	$	1,008

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Wealth Management and Trust (In thousands)
Fees and other income $ 11,739
$ 10,921
$ 33,934
$ 33,277
Operating expense (1) 11,752
12,307
37,562
41,897
Income/ (loss) before income taxes (13 ) (1,386 ) (3,628 ) (8,620 )
Income tax expense/ (benefit) (125 ) (538 ) (1,530 ) (3,448 )
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations 112
(848 ) (2,098 ) (5,172 )
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company $ 112
$ (848 ) $ (2,098 ) $ (5,172 )

Assets $ 73,511
$ 86,349
$ 73,511
$ 86,349
Amortization of intangibles $ 727
$ 745
$ 2,181
$ 2,235
Depreciation $ 330
$ 317
$ 1,008
$ 818



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Investment Management (1)	(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	—	$	8	$	6	$	16
Fees and other income	3,245		11,280		18,887		33,230
Total revenues	3,245		11,288		18,893		33,246
Operating expense	2,235		8,407		13,880		25,107
Income before income taxes	1,010		2,881		5,013		8,139
Income tax expense	222		981		1,142		2,719
Net income from continuing operations	788		1,900		3,871		5,420
Noncontrolling interests	188		451		878		1,425
Net income attributable to the Company	$	600	$	1,449	$	2,993	$	3,995

Assets	$	7,496	$	93,910	$	7,496	$	93,910
Amortization of intangibles	$	—	$	650	$	—	$	1,951
Depreciation	$	29	$	62	$	95	$	189

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Investment Management (In thousands)
Net interest income $ 8
$ 4
$ 16
$ 12
Fees and other income 11,280
10,717
33,230
32,023
Total revenues 11,288
10,721
33,246
32,035
Operating expense 8,407
7,986
25,107
23,904
Income before income taxes 2,881
2,735
8,139
8,131
Income tax expense 981
898
2,719
2,675
Net income from continuing operations 1,900
1,837
5,420
5,456
Noncontrolling interests 451
507
1,425
1,453
Net income attributable to the Company $ 1,449
$ 1,330
$ 3,995
$ 4,003

Assets $ 93,910
$ 93,669
$ 93,910
$ 93,669
Amortization of intangibles $ 650
$ 650
$ 1,951
$ 1,951
Depreciation $ 62
$ 68
$ 189
$ 215

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018		2017		2018		2017
Wealth Advisory	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	36	$	4	$	82	$	10	$	99	$	36	$	224	$	82
Fees and other income	13,299		12,778		39,122		38,099		14,022		13,299		41,278		39,122
Total revenues	13,335		12,782		39,204		38,109		14,121		13,335		41,502		39,204
Operating expense	9,174		8,975		27,560		27,839		9,510		9,174		29,273		27,560
Income before income taxes	4,161		3,807		11,644		10,270		4,611		4,161		12,229		11,644
Income tax expense	1,562		1,398		4,360		3,812		1,242		1,562		3,242		4,360
Net income from continuing operations	2,599		2,409		7,284		6,458		3,369		2,599		8,987		7,284
Noncontrolling interests	623		603		1,765		1,557		736		623		2,064		1,765
Net income attributable to the Company	$	1,976	$	1,806	$	5,519	$	4,901	$	2,633	$	1,976	$	6,923	$	5,519

Assets	$	77,289	$	79,133	$	77,289	$	79,133	$	79,907	$	77,289	$	79,907	$	77,289
Amortization of intangibles	$	49	$	173	$	146	$	554	$	49	$	49	$	146	$	146
Depreciation	$	237	$	219	$	698	$	653	$	161	$	237	$	488	$	698


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Holding Company and Eliminations	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	(711	)	$	(556	)	$	(2,018	)	$	(1,656	)	$	(1,009	)	$	(711	)	$	(2,790	)	$	(2,018	)
Fees and other income	229			68			323			298			74			229			147			323
Total revenues	(482		)	(488		)	(1,695		)	(1,358		)	(935		)	(482		)	(2,643		)	(1,695		)
Operating expense	1,531			1,963			5,274			5,662			1,201			1,531			3,985			5,274
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	(2,013		)	(2,451		)	(6,969		)	(7,020		)	(2,136		)	(2,013		)	(6,628		)	(6,969		)
Income tax expense/ (benefit)(2)	(763		)	(1,332		)	(2,856		)	(2,961		)	(692		)	(763		)	10,710			(2,856		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	(1,250		)	(1,119		)	(4,113		)	(4,059		)	(1,444		)	(1,250		)	(17,338		)	(4,113		)
Discontinued operations	1,186			1,047			3,881			4,357			—			1,186			1,696			3,881
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	(64	)	$	(72	)	$	(232	)	$	298		$	(1,444	)	$	(64	)	$	(15,642	)	$	(232	)

Assets	$	(89,148	)	$	(90,485	)	$	(89,148	)	$	(90,485	)
Depreciation	$	—		$	8		$	—		$	29
Assets (including eliminations)													$	(83,937	)	$	(89,148	)	$	(83,937	)	$	(89,148	)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Total Company	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	56,627		$	49,871		$	167,414		$	148,919		$	59,641		$	56,627		$	174,569		$	167,414
Fees and other income	40,267			40,012			114,791			114,829			32,314			40,267			104,152			114,791
Total revenues	96,894			89,883			282,205			263,748			91,955			96,894			278,721			282,205
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(432		)	(138		)	(6,727		)	(5,806		)	(949		)	(432		)	(2,291		)	(6,727		)
Operating expense	69,346			61,670			205,947			193,110			68,557			69,346			203,798			205,947
Income before income taxes	27,980			28,351			82,985			76,444			24,347			27,980			77,214			82,985
Income tax expense	8,289			8,652			24,805			23,716			5,461			8,289			28,886			24,805
Net income from continuing operations	19,691			19,699			58,180			52,728			18,886			19,691			48,328			58,180
Noncontrolling interests	1,074			1,110			3,190			3,010			924			1,074			2,942			3,190
Discontinued operations	1,186			1,047			3,881			4,357			—			1,186			1,696			3,881
Net income attributable to the Company	$	19,803		$	19,636		$	58,871		$	54,075		$	17,962		$	19,803		$	47,082		$	58,871

Assets	$	8,269,398		$	7,681,550		$	8,269,398		$	7,681,550		$	8,375,840		$	8,269,398		$	8,375,840		$	8,269,398
Amortization of intangibles	$	1,426		$	1,568		$	4,278		$	4,740		$	750		$	1,426		$	2,249		$	4,278
Depreciation	$	2,060		$	1,706		$	6,040		$	5,080		$	2,916		$	2,060		$	7,579		$	6,040

_____________________

(1)

~~Operating expense related to~~Results for the ~~Wealth~~Investment Management ~~and Trust~~ segment ~~includes no restructuring expense~~ for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017. There was no restructuring expense~~2017 include results for DGHM and Anchor. Results for the ~~three months ended September 30, 2016 and $2.0 million of restructuring expense~~Investment Management segment for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2018 include results for DGHM and results for Anchor through its sale date in April 2018. Assets for the Investment Management segment at September 30, 2017 include assets of DGHM and Anchor. Assets for the Investment Management segment at September 30, 2018 include assets of DGHM.


(2)	Income tax expense/ (benefit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 include $12.7 million in additional expense related to the sale of Anchor in April 2018.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

4. Investments

The following ~~table presents~~tables present a summary of investment securities:


	Amortized Cost		Unrealized					Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
As of September 30, 2017
At September 30, 2018
Available-for-sale securities at fair value:
U.S. government and agencies	$	35,129	$	24	$	(590	)	$	34,563	$	35,025	$	—	$	(1,526	)	$	33,499
Government-sponsored entities	305,210		789		(1,143		)	304,856		275,767		—		(6,942		)	268,825
Municipal bonds	301,436		4,900		(1,829		)	304,507		304,473		1,130		(5,614		)	299,989
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	539,064		739		(10,180		)	529,623		479,412		208		(25,672		)	453,948
Other	15,796		485		(3		)	16,278
Other (2)										7,079		—		—			7,079
Total	$	1,196,635	$	6,937	$	(13,745	)	$	1,189,827	$	1,101,756	$	1,338	$	(39,754	)	$	1,063,340

Held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost:
U.S. government and agencies	$	4,996	$	—	$	—		$	4,996	$	11,964	—		$	(1	)	$	11,963
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	79,094		89		(301		)	78,882		63,504		—		(2,540		)	60,964
Total	$	84,090	$	89	$	(301	)	$	83,878	$	75,468	$	—	$	(2,541	)	$	72,927

As of December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2017
Available-for-sale securities at fair value:
U.S. government and agencies	$	40,704	$	86	$	(854	)	$	39,936	$	35,132	$	—	$	(833	)	$	34,299
Government-sponsored entities	337,865		1,058		(2,259		)	336,664		305,101		22		(2,622		)	302,501
Municipal bonds	296,271		2,116		(4,990		)	293,397		299,647		4,559		(1,148		)	303,058
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	584,960		928		(15,561		)	570,327		521,753		491		(12,568		)	509,676
Other	23,361		447		—			23,808
Other (2)										20,794		—		—			20,794
Total	$	1,283,161	$	4,635	$	(23,664	)	$	1,264,132	$	1,182,427	$	5,072	$	(17,171	)	$	1,170,328

Held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost:
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	$	93,079	$	1	$	(476	)	$	92,604	$	74,576	$	—	$	(795	)	$	73,781
Total	$	93,079	$	1	$	(476	)	$	92,604	$	74,576	$	—	$	(795	)	$	73,781

_____________________


(1)	All mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by the U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, or government-sponsored entities.


(2)	Included in Other available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are primarily money market mutual fund securities.

The following table presents the maturities of available-for-sale investment securities, based on contractual maturity, as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018. Certain securities are callable before their final maturity. Additionally, certain securities (such as mortgage-backed securities) are shown within the table below based on their final (contractual) maturity, but due to prepayments and amortization are expected to have shorter lives.

Available-for-sale Securities
Amortized
cost

Fair
value
(In thousands)
Within one year $ 60,984
$ 61,511
After one, but within five years 342,959
344,253
After five, but within ten years 321,379
315,209
Greater than ten years 471,313
468,854
Total $ 1,196,635
$ 1,189,827

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	Available-for-sale Securities
	Amortized cost		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	106,582	$	106,168
After one, but within five years	295,910		288,004
After five, but within ten years	294,991		279,099
Greater than ten years	404,273		390,069
Total	$	1,101,756	$	1,063,340

The following table presents the maturities of held-to-maturity investment securities, based on contractual maturity, as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018.


	Held-to-maturity Securities				Held-to-maturity Securities
	Amortized cost		Fair value		Amortized cost		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	4,996	$	4,996	$	11,964	$	11,963
After one, but within five years	—		—		—		—
After five, but within ten years	13,418		13,409		41,413		39,807
Greater than ten years	65,676		65,473		22,091		21,157
Total	$	84,090	$	83,878	$	75,468	$	72,927

The following table presents the proceeds from sales, gross realized gains and gross realized losses for available-for-sale securities that were sold or called during the following ~~periods:~~periods as well as changes in the fair value of equity securities as prescribed by ASC 321, Investment - Equity Securities. ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurements of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities was adopted on January 1, 2018, at which time a cumulative effect adjustment of $339 thousand was recorded to reclassify the amount of accumulated unrealized gains related to equity securities from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016		2017			2016			2018		2017			2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Proceeds from sales and calls	$	16,207		$	12,829	$	119,238		$	41,961
Proceeds from sales (1)												$	16,231	$	16,207		$	51,781		$	119,238
Realized gains	235			273		509			520			—		235			7			509
Realized losses	(5		)	—		(23		)	(1		)	—		(5		)	(1		)	(23		)
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on equity securities reflected in the consolidated statement of operations												—		n/a			(23		)	n/a

_____________________

(1)

Included in Proceeds from sales are proceeds from the sale of money market mutual funds of $16.2 million and $51.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively and $8.2 million and $53.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. Money market mutual funds maintain a constant net asset value of $1.00 and therefore have no realized gain or loss when sold.

The following tables present information regarding securities ~~as of~~at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 having temporary impairment, due to the fair values having declined below the amortized cost of the individual securities, and the time period that the investments have been temporarily impaired.

Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total

Fair
value

Unrealized
losses

Fair
value

Unrealized
losses

Fair
value

Unrealized
losses

# of
securities
September 30, 2017
Available-for-sale securities (In thousands)
U.S. government and agencies $ 14,883
$ (129 ) $ 9,690
$ (461 ) $ 24,573
$ (590 ) 4
Government-sponsored entities 101,977
(818 ) 10,351
(325 ) 112,328
(1,143 ) 16
Municipal bonds 42,281
(399 ) 40,093
(1,430 ) 82,374
(1,829 ) 45
Mortgage-backed securities (1) 265,098
(3,376 ) 219,521
(6,804 ) 484,619
(10,180 ) 99
Other 21
(3 ) —
—
21
(3 ) 2
Total $ 424,260
$ (4,725 ) $ 279,655
$ (9,020 ) $ 703,915
$ (13,745 ) 166

Held-to-maturity securities
Mortgage-backed securities (1) $ 54,384
$ (239 ) $ 4,008
$ (62 ) $ 58,392
$ (301 ) 11
Total $ 54,384
$ (239 ) $ 4,008
$ (62 ) $ 58,392
$ (301 ) 11

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total						Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			# of securities	Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			# of securities
	(In thousands, except number of securities)																(In thousands, except number of securities)
December 31, 2016
September 30, 2018
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. government and agencies	$	19,094	$	(838	)	$	643	$	(16	)	$	19,737	$	(854	)	4	$	4,966	$	(31	)	$	28,533	$	(1,495	)	$	33,499	$	(1,526	)	6
Government-sponsored entities	125,412		(2,259		)	—		—			125,412		(2,259		)	18	127,616		(1,937		)	141,209		(5,005		)	268,825		(6,942		)	40
Municipal bonds	182,395		(4,957		)	2,720		(33		)	185,115		(4,990		)	109	192,479		(2,799		)	47,750		(2,815		)	240,229		(5,614		)	124
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	492,008		(13,988		)	41,544		(1,573		)	533,552		(15,561		)	99	30,247		(960		)	410,701		(24,712		)	440,948		(25,672		)	110
Other	—		—			—		—			—		—			—
Total	$	818,909	$	(22,042	)	$	44,907	$	(1,622	)	$	863,816	$	(23,664	)	230	$	355,308	$	(5,727	)	$	628,193	$	(34,027	)	$	983,501	$	(39,754	)	280

Held-to-maturity securities
U.S. government and agencies																	11,963		(1		)	—		—			11,963		(1		)	2
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	$	87,483	$	(476	)	$	—	$	—		$	87,483	$	(476	)	15	$	8,866	$	(307	)	$	52,098	$	(2,233	)	$	60,964	$	(2,540	)	16
Total	$	87,483	$	(476	)	$	—	$	—		$	87,483	$	(476	)	15	$	20,829	$	(308	)	$	52,098	$	(2,233	)	$	72,927	$	(2,541	)	18



	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			# of securities
	(In thousands, except number of securities)
December 31, 2017
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. government and agencies	$	14,902	$	(79	)	$	19,397	$	(754	)	$	34,299	$	(833	)	6
Government-sponsored entities	220,275		(1,350		)	38,273		(1,272		)	258,548		(2,622		)	36
Municipal bonds	46,112		(131		)	50,842		(1,017		)	96,954		(1,148		)	63
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	97,117		(903		)	386,785		(11,665		)	483,902		(12,568		)	103
Total	$	378,406	$	(2,463	)	$	495,297	$	(14,708	)	$	873,703	$	(17,171	)	208

Held-to-maturity securities
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	$	59,218	$	(534	)	$	14,563	$	(261	)	$	73,781	$	(795	)	16
Total	$	59,218	$	(534	)	$	14,563	$	(261	)	$	73,781	$	(795	)	16

_____________________


(1)	All mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by the U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, or government-sponsored entities.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the U.S. government and agencies securities, government-sponsored entities securities and mortgage-backed securities in the first table above had current Standard and Poor’s credit ratings of AAA. The municipal bonds in the first table above had a current Standard and Poor’s credit rating of at least AA-. As of December 31, 2017, the U.S. government and agencies securities and government-sponsored entities securities in the second table above had current Moody’s credit ratings of Aaa. The mortgage-backed securities in the second table above had a current Standard and Poor’s credit rating of at least AA. The municipal bonds in the ~~first~~second table above had a current Standard and Poor’s credit rating of at least AA- or a current Moody’s credit rating of at least Aa3. ~~The other securities in the first table above consisted of equity securities.~~ At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company does not consider these investments other-than-temporarily impaired ~~because~~as the decline in fair value on investments is primarily attributed to changes in interest rates and not credit quality.

At September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the amount of investment securities in an unrealized loss position greater than 12 months, as well as in total, was primarily due to changes in interest ~~rates.~~rates and not credit quality. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had no intent to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Company would be forced to sell any of these securities prior to the full recovery of all unrealized loss amounts.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Cost method investments, which are included in other assets, can be temporarily impaired when the fair values decline below the amortized costs of the individual investments. There were no cost method investments with unrealized losses as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 or December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The Company’s cost method investments primarily include low income housing partnerships which generate tax credits. The Company also holds partnership interests in venture capital funds formed to provide financing to small businesses and to promote community development. The Company had ~~$40.4~~$55.0 million and ~~$34.2~~$39.4 million in cost method investments included in other assets as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

5. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined under GAAP as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Financial instruments are considered Level 1 when valuation can be based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 financial instruments are valued using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or models using inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data of substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable and when determination of the fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:


	As of September 30, 2017		Fair value measurements at reporting date using:						As of September 30, 2018		Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
			Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)				Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government and agencies	$	34,563	$	34,358	$	205	$	—	$	33,499	$	—	$	33,499	$	—
Government-sponsored entities	304,856		—		304,856		—		268,825		—		268,825		—
Municipal bonds	304,507		—		304,507		—		299,989		—		299,989		—
Mortgage-backed securities	529,623		—		529,623		—		453,948		—		453,948		—
Other(1)	16,278		16,278		—		—		7,079		7,079		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	1,189,827		50,636		1,139,191		—		1,063,340		7,079		1,056,261		—
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	15,314		—		15,314		—		27,792		—		27,792		—
Derivatives - interest rate swaps	39		—		39		—		903		—		903		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreement	1		—		1		—		20		—		20		—
Other investments	6,857		6,857		—		—
Trading securities held in the “rabbi trust” (2)									7,806		7,806		—		—

Liabilities:
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	$	15,536	$	—	$	15,536	$	—	$	28,209	$	—	$	28,209	$	—
Derivatives - interest rate swaps	360		—		360		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreement	137		—		137		—		90		—		90		—
Other liabilities	6,857		6,857		—		—
Deferred compensation “rabbi trust” (2)									7,806		7,806		—		—

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


			Fair value measurements at reporting date using:								Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
	As of December 31, 2016		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		As of December 31, 2017		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government and agencies	$	39,936	$	39,293	$	643	$	—	$	34,299	$	34,096	$	203	$	—
Government-sponsored entities	336,664		—		336,664		—		302,501		—		302,501		—
Municipal bonds	293,397		—		293,397		—		303,058		—		303,058		—
Mortgage-backed securities	570,327		—		570,327		—		509,676		—		509,676		—
Other	23,808		23,808		—		—		20,794		20,794		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	1,264,132		63,101		1,201,031		—		1,170,328		54,890		1,115,438		—
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	17,032		—		17,032		—		18,575		—		18,575		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreement	15		—		15		—
Other investments	6,110		6,110		—		—
Derivatives - interest rate swaps									555		—		555		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreements									1		—		1		—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forwards									2		—		2		—
Trading securities held in the “rabbi trust” (2)									7,062		7,062		—		—

Liabilities:
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	$	16,560	$	—	$	16,560	$	—	$	18,953	$	—	$	18,953	$	—
Derivatives - interest rate swaps	1,040		—		1,040		—		80		—		80		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreement	6		—		6		—
Other liabilities	6,110		6,110		—		—
Derivatives - risk participation agreements									108		—		108		—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forwards									2		—		2		—
Deferred compensation “rabbi trust” (2)									7,062		7,062		—		—

_____________________


(1)	Other available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of primarily money market mutual fund securities.

(2)

The Company has adopted a special trust for the Deferred Compensation Plan called a “rabbi trust.” The rabbi trust is an arrangement that is used to accumulate assets that may be used to fund the Company’s obligation to pay benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan. To prevent immediate taxation to the executives who participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan, the amounts placed in the rabbi trust must remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors. The investments chosen by the participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan are mirrored by the rabbi trust as a way to minimize the earnings volatility of the Deferred Compensation Plan.

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, available-for-sale securities consisted ~~primarily~~ of U.S. government and agencies securities, government-sponsored entities securities, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and other available-for-sale securities. ~~The equities (which are categorized as other available-for-sale securities)~~Available-for-sale Level 1 securities are valued with prices quoted in active ~~markets. The~~markets and include current issuances or “on-the-run” U.S. Treasury securities (which are categorized as U.S. government and agencies securities), ~~as of both September 30, 2017~~money market mutual funds and December 31, 2016, are valued with prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 1 measurement. The government-sponsored entities securities, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and certain investments in Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loansequities (which are categorized as ~~U.S. government and agencies~~other available-for-sale securities). Available-for-sale Level 2 securities generally have quoted prices but are traded less frequently than exchange-traded securities and can be priced using market data from similar ~~assets. Therefore, they have been~~assets and include government-sponsored entities securities, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, “off-the-run” U.S. Treasury securities, and certain investments in SBA loans (which are categorized as U.S. government and agencies securities). “Off-the-run” U.S. Treasury securities are Treasury bonds and notes issued before the most recently issued bond or note of a ~~Level 2 measurement.~~particular maturity. When Treasuries move to the secondary over-the-counter market, they become less frequently traded, therefore, they are considered “off-the-run”. No investments held as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 or December 31, ~~2016~~2017 were categorized as Level 3. There were no changes in the valuation techniques used for measuring the fair value of available-for-sale securities in the nine ~~month periods~~months ended September 30, ~~2017 or 2016.~~2018.

In managing its interest rate and credit risk, the Company utilizes derivative instruments ~~such as~~including interest rate customer swaps, interest rate swaps, and risk participation agreements. As a service to its customers, the Company may utilize derivative instruments ~~such as~~including customer foreign exchange forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange risk, if any. The

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied ~~volatilities. Therefore,~~volatilities, and therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 2 measurement as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial ~~Statements-Note~~Statements - Note 8: Derivatives and Hedging Activities” for further details.

To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. Counterparty exposure is evaluated by netting positions that are subject to master netting agreements, as well as considering the amount of collateral securing the position.

The Company has determined that the majority of inputs used to value its derivatives ~~fall~~are within Level ~~2 of the fair value hierarchy, although the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of~~

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

~~current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.~~2. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

~~Other investments, which are not considered available-for-sale investments, consist of deferred compensation trusts, which~~Trading securities held in the rabbi trust consist of publicly traded mutual fund investments that are valued at prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 1 ~~measurement~~ as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Company accounts for its investments held in the rabbi trust in accordance with ASC 320, Investments - Debt and Equity Securities. The investments held in the rabbi trust are classified as trading securities. The assets of the rabbi trust are carried at their fair value within Other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of the securities are recorded as an increase or decrease in Other income each quarter. The deferred compensation liability reflects the market value of the securities selected by the participants and is included within Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of the liability are recorded as an increase or decrease in Other expense each quarter.

At September 30, 2018, five U.S. Treasury securities totaling $33.4 million were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 as the securities were determined to be “off-the-run”. There were no other transfers ~~between levels~~ for assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis ~~during the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.~~at December 31, 2017.

There were no Level 3 assets valued on a recurring basis at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 or December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements ~~fall:~~fall.



	As of September 30, 2018		Fair value measurements at reporting date using:						Gain (losses) from fair value changes
	As of September 30, 2018		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		Three months ended September 30, 2018			Nine months ended September 30, 2018
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans (1)	$	2,005	$	—	$	—	$	2,005	$	(440	)	$	(1,367	)

_____________________


(1)	Collateral-dependent impaired loans held at September 30, 2018 that had write-downs in fair value or whose specific reserve changed during the first nine months of 2018.



	As of September 30, 2017		Fair value measurements at reporting date using:						Gain (losses) from fair value changes
	As of September 30, 2017		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		Three months ended September 30, 2017			Nine months ended September 30, 2017
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans (1)	$	1,978	$	—	$	—	$	1,978	$	(255	)	$	(474	)

_____________________

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


(1)	Collateral-dependent impaired loans held at September 30, 2017 that had write-downs in fair value or whose specific reserve changed during the first nine months of 2017.

As of September 30, 2016 Fair value measurements at reporting date using: Gain (losses) from fair value changes
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets (Level 1)

Significant
other
observable
inputs (Level 2)

Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
Three months ended September 30, 2016 Nine months ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans (1) $ 11,936
$ —
$ —
$ 11,936
$ (418 ) $ (2,098 )

~~_____________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~Collateral-dependent impaired loans held at September 30, 2016 that had write-downs in fair value or whose specific reserve changed during the first nine months of 2016.~~

The following ~~table presents~~tables present additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

As of September 30, 2017
Fair Value
Valuation
Technique

Unobservable
Input

Range of
Inputs
Utilized

Weighted
Average of
Inputs
Utilized
(In thousands)
Impaired Loans $ 1,978
Appraisals of Collateral Discount for costs to sell 0% - 7% 4%
Appraisal adjustments 0% - 51% 17%

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~



	As of September 30, 2018
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range of Inputs Utilized	Weighted Average of Inputs Utilized
	(In thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	2,005	Appraisals of Collateral	Discount for costs to sell	0% - 23%	6%
Impaired Loans	$	2,005	Appraisals of Collateral	Appraisal adjustments	—%	—%

As of September 30, 2016

As of September 30, 2017

Fair Value

Valuation

Technique

Unobservable

Input

Range of

Inputs

Utilized

Weighted

Average of

Inputs

Utilized

Fair Value

Valuation

Technique

Unobservable

Input

Range of

Inputs

Utilized

Weighted

Average of

Inputs

Utilized

(In thousands)

Impaired Loans

11,936

Appraisals of Collateral

Discount for costs to sell

5% - 78%

1,978

Appraisals of Collateral

Discount for costs to sell

0% - 7%

Appraisal adjustments

0% - 20%

16%

Appraisal adjustments

0% - 51%

17%

Impaired loans include those loans that were adjusted to the fair value of underlying collateral as required under ASC 310, Receivables. The amount does not include impaired loans that are measured based on expected future cash flows discounted at the respective loan’s original effective interest rate, as that amount is not considered a fair value measurement. The Company uses appraisals, which management may adjust to reflect estimated fair value declines, or may apply other discounts to appraised values for unobservable factors resulting from its knowledge of the property or consideration of broker quotes. The appraisers use a market, income, and/or a cost approach in determining the value of the collateral. Therefore they have been categorized as a Level 3 measurement.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

As of September 30, 2017
Book Value Fair Value
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)

Significant
other
observable
inputs (Level 2)

Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
(In thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 110,440
$ 110,440
$ 110,440
$ —
$ —
Investment securities held-to-maturity 84,090
83,878
4,996
78,882
—
Loans held for sale 1,957
2,013
—
2,013
—
Loans, net 6,338,328
6,340,308
—
—
6,340,308
Other financial assets 96,097
96,097
—
96,097
—
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits 6,262,347
6,262,234
—
6,262,234
—
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 59,903
59,903
—
59,903
—
Federal funds purchased 70,000
70,000
—
70,000
—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings 812,773
813,535
—
813,535
—
Junior subordinated debentures 106,363
96,363
—
—
96,363
Other financial liabilities 2,684
2,684
—
2,684
—

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~



	As of September 30, 2018
	Book Value		Fair Value		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	92,634	$	92,634	$	92,634	$	—	$	—
Investment securities held-to-maturity	75,468		72,927		—		72,927		—
Loans held for sale	3,344		3,374		—		3,374		—
Loans, net	6,646,920		6,542,225		—		—		6,542,225
Other financial assets	83,813		83,813		—		83,813		—
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits	6,768,723		6,765,393		—		6,765,393		—
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	39,453		39,453		—		39,453		—
Federal funds purchased	120,000		120,000		—		120,000		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	441,836		437,887		—		437,887		—
Junior subordinated debentures	106,363		96,363		—		—		96,363
Other financial liabilities	2,964		2,964		—		2,964		—


	As of December 31, 2016										As of December 31, 2017
	Book Value		Fair Value		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		Book Value		Fair Value		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	106,557	$	106,557	$	106,557	$	—	$	—	$	120,541	$	120,541	$	120,541	$	—	$	—
Investment securities held-to-maturity	93,079		92,604		—		92,604		—		74,576		73,781		—		73,781		—
Loans held for sale	3,464		3,428		—		3,428		—		4,697		4,737		—		4,737		—
Loans, net	6,036,277		6,021,611		—		—		6,021,611		6,430,286		6,388,297		—		—		6,388,297
Other financial assets	77,956		77,956		—		77,956		—		93,449		93,449		—		93,449		—
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits	6,085,146		6,084,765		—		6,084,765		—		6,510,246		6,509,197		—		6,509,197		—
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	59,624		59,624		—		59,624		—		32,169		32,169		—		32,169		—
Federal funds purchased	80,000		80,000		—		80,000		—		30,000		30,000		—		30,000		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	734,205		734,941		—		734,941		—		693,681		692,402		—		692,402		—
Junior subordinated debentures	106,363		96,363		—		—		96,363		106,363		96,363		—		—		96,363
Other financial liabilities	1,942		1,942		—		1,942		—		2,224		2,224		—		2,224		—

The estimated fair values have been determined by using available quoted market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. The aggregate fair value amounts presented above do not represent the underlying value of the financial assets and liabilities toof the Company taken as a whole as they do not reflect any premium or discount the Company might recognize if the ~~asset~~assets were sold or the ~~liability~~liabilities sold, settled, or redeemed. An excess of fair value over book value on

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

financial assets represents a premium, or gain, the Company might recognize if the ~~asset~~assets were sold, while an excess of book value over fair value on financial liabilities represents a premium, or gain, the ~~company~~Company might recognize if the ~~liability~~liabilities were sold, settled, or redeemed prior to maturity. Conversely, losses would be recognized if ~~an asset was~~assets were sold where the book value exceeded the fair value or ~~a liability was~~liabilities were sold where the fair value exceeded the book value.

The fair value estimates provided are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and the characteristics of the financial instrument. The estimates do not provide for any premiums or discounts that could result from concentrations of ownership of a financial instrument. Because no active market exists for some of the Company’s financial instruments, certain fair value estimates are based on subjective judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the financial instruments, future expected loss experience, prepayment assumptions, and other factors. The resulting estimates involve uncertainties and are considered best estimates. Changes made to any of the underlying assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The carrying value reported in the balance ~~sheets~~sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of their maturities and are classified as Level 1.

~~Held-to-maturity investment~~Investment securities held-to-maturity

~~Held-to-maturity~~Investment securities held-to-maturity securities currently include mortgage-backed securities and a U.S. Treasury ~~securities.~~security. The ~~U.S.~~U.S Treasury ~~securities~~security as of September 30, ~~2017 are valued with prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have~~2018 is an “off-the-run” U.S. Treasury security, therefore, it has been categorized as a Level 12 measurement. There were no U.S. Treasury securities held-to-maturity as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The mortgage-backed securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but may be traded in active markets. The fair value of these securities is based on quoted market prices obtained from external pricing services. The principal market for our securities portfolio is the secondary institutional market, with an exit price that is predominantly reflective of bid level pricing in that market. Accordingly, ~~these~~ held-to-maturity mortgage-backed securities are included in the Level 2 fair value category.

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes~~At September 30, 2018, one U.S. Treasury security totaling $12.0 million was transferred from Level 1 to ~~Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

Level 2 as the security was determined to be “off-the-run”. There were no other transfers of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017.

Loans held for sale

Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. Fair value estimates are based on actual commitments to sell the loans to investors at an agreed upon price or current market prices if rates have changed since the time the loan closed. Accordingly, loans held for sale are included in the Level 2 fair value category.

Loans, net

Fair value estimates are based on loans with similar financial characteristics. ~~Fair values~~Following the adoption of ~~commercial and residential mortgage loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusted~~ASU 2016-01 in 2018, the Company updated its process for prepayment estimates and using discount rates approximately equal to current market rates on loans with similar credit and interest rate characteristics and maturities. The fair value estimates for home equity and other loans are based on outstanding loan terms and pricing in the local markets. The method of estimating the fair value of ~~the~~ loans, ~~disclosed in the table above does not incorporate the exit price concept in the presentation~~net of allowance for loan losses. The updated process estimates the fair value of ~~these financial instruments. Net~~ loans using the exit price notion, which includes identifying an exit price using current market information for origination rates and making certain adjustments to incorporate credit risk, transaction costs and other adjustments utilizing publicly available rates and indicies. Loans, net are included in the Level 3 fair value category based upon the inputs and valuation techniques used. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information on ASU 2016-01.

Other financial assets

Other financial assets consist of accrued interest and fees receivable, and stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank ~~("FRB"~~(“FRB”), for which the carrying amount approximates fair value, and are classified as Level 2.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Deposits

The fair values reported for transaction accounts (demand, NOW, savings, and money market) equal their respective book values reported on the balance ~~sheets~~sheet and are classified as Level 2. The fair values disclosed are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values for certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates used are representative of approximate rates currently offered on certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is estimated based on contractual cash flows discounted at the Bank’s incremental borrowing rate for FHLB borrowings with similar maturities and ~~therefore these securities~~ have been classified as Level 2.

Federal funds purchased

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, if any, approximate fair value due to their short-term nature and therefore these funds have been classified as Level 2.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

The fair value reported for FHLB borrowings is estimated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate used is based on the Bank’s estimated current incremental borrowing rate for FHLB borrowings of similar maturities and therefore these borrowings have been classified as Level 2.

Junior subordinated debentures

The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures issued by Boston Private Capital Trust I and Boston Private Capital Trust II were estimated using Level 3 inputs such as the interest rates on these securities, current rates for similar debt, a consideration for illiquidity of trading in the debt, and regulatory changes that would result in an unfavorable change in the regulatory capital treatment of this type of debt.

Other financial liabilities

Other financial liabilities ~~consist~~consists of accrued interest payable for which the carrying amount approximates fair value and is classified as Level 2.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk

The Bank’s commitments to originate loans and for unused lines and outstanding letters of credit are primarily at market interest rates and therefore, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

6. Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality

The Bank’s lending activities are conducted principally in the regions of New England, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Southern California. The Bank originates single and multi-family residential loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, commercial ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt loans, construction and land loans, and home equity and other consumer loans. Most loans are secured by borrowers’ personal or business assets. The ability of the Bank’s single family residential and consumer borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is generally dependent on the level of overall economic conditions within the Bank’s lending areas. Commercial, construction, and land borrowers’ ability to repay is generally dependent upon the health of the economy and real estate values, including, in particular, the performance of the construction sector. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changing conditions in the New England, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Southern California economies and real estate markets.

~~Total loans include deferred loan origination (fees)/ costs, net, of $7.1 million and $5.9 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.~~

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio bybased on the portfolio segment ~~and~~as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	583,214	$	520,992
Commercial tax-exempt	438,807		418,698
Total commercial and industrial	1,022,021		939,690
Commercial real estate	2,399,080		2,440,220
Construction and land	197,524		164,990
Residential	2,862,879		2,682,533
Home equity	93,390		99,958
Consumer and other	145,526		177,637
Total	$	6,720,420	$	6,505,028

The following table presents nonaccrual loans receivable by class of receivable as of the dates indicated:

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial $ 618,256
$ 611,370
Commercial tax exempt 431,350
398,604
Total commercial and industrial 1,049,606
1,009,974
Commercial real estate 2,363,159
2,302,244
Construction and land 118,291
104,839
Residential 2,600,788
2,379,861
Home equity 107,227
118,817
Consumer and other 174,130
198,619
Total $ 6,413,201
$ 6,114,354

~~The following table presents nonaccrual loans receivable by portfolio segment and class of receivable as of the dates indicated:~~


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	968	$	572	$	1,968	$	748
Commercial tax exempt	—		—
Commercial tax-exempt					—		—
Total commercial and industrial	968		572		1,968		748
Commercial real estate	2,601		4,583		546		1,985
Construction and land	206		179		—		110
Residential	8,765		10,908		6,798		8,470
Home equity	1,062		1,072		2,773		2,840
Consumer and other	21		1		12		142
Total	$	13,623	$	17,315	$	12,097	$	14,295

The Bank’s policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on a loan when the collectability of principal or interest is in doubt. In certain instances, although infrequent, loans that have become 90 days or more past due may remain on accrual status if the value of the collateral securing the loan is sufficient to cover principal and interest and the loan is in the process of collection. There were no loans 90 days or more past due, but still accruing as of both September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The Bank’s policy for returning a loan to accrual status requires the loan to be brought current and for the client to show a history of making timely payments (generally six consecutive months). For troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”), a return

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

to accrual status generally requires timely payments for a period of six months in accordance with the restructured loan terms, along with meeting other criteria.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables show the payment status of loans receivable by class of receivable as of the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2017																		September 30, 2018
	Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans												Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due		Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due		Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)																		(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	945	$	14	$	959	$	400	$	350	$	218	$	968	$	616,329	$	618,256	$	1,645	$	2,686	$	4,331	$	1,213	$	43	$	712	$	1,968	$	576,915	$	583,214
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		431,350		431,350
Commercial tax-exempt																			—		—		—		—		—		—		—		438,807		438,807
Commercial real estate	663		244		907		670		—		1,931		2,601		2,359,651		2,363,159		326		661		987		—		—		546		546		2,397,547		2,399,080
Construction and land	413		—		413		59		4		143		206		117,672		118,291		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		197,524		197,524
Residential	—		226		226		5,063		152		3,550		8,765		2,591,797		2,600,788		—		4,518		4,518		1,134		197		5,467		6,798		2,851,563		2,862,879
Home equity	402		1,800		2,202		72		—		990		1,062		103,963		107,227		901		867		1,768		—		—		2,773		2,773		88,849		93,390
Consumer and other	568		17		585		13		—		8		21		173,524		174,130		3		—		3		2		10		—		12		145,511		145,526
Total	$	2,991	$	2,301	$	5,292	$	6,277	$	506	$	6,840	$	13,623	$	6,394,286	$	6,413,201	$	2,875	$	8,732	$	11,607	$	2,349	$	250	$	9,498	$	12,097	$	6,696,716	$	6,720,420


	December 31, 2016																		December 31, 2017
	Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans												Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due		Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due		Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)																		(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	541	$	1,078	$	1,619	$	537	$	—	$	35	$	572	$	609,179	$	611,370	$	10,903	$	849	$	11,752	$	355	$	—	$	393	$	748	$	508,492	$	520,992
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		398,604		398,604
Commercial tax-exempt																			—		—		—		—		—		—		—		418,698		418,698
Commercial real estate	3,096		—		3,096		2,311		835		1,437		4,583		2,294,565		2,302,244		4,043		—		4,043		163		—		1,822		1,985		2,434,192		2,440,220
Construction and land	—		—		—		129		12		38		179		104,660		104,839		—		—		—		—		—		110		110		164,880		164,990
Residential	3,646		536		4,182		2,148		1,274		7,486		10,908		2,364,771		2,379,861		7,239		1,635		8,874		805		3,172		4,493		8,470		2,665,189		2,682,533
Home equity	245		—		245		—		80		992		1,072		117,500		118,817		355		—		355		—		71		2,769		2,840		96,763		99,958
Consumer and other	5,995		—		5,995		1		—		—		1		192,623		198,619		24		—		24		17		125		—		142		177,471		177,637
Total	$	13,523	$	1,614	$	15,137	$	5,126	$	2,201	$	9,988	$	17,315	$	6,081,902	$	6,114,354	$	22,564	$	2,484	$	25,048	$	1,340	$	3,368	$	9,587	$	14,295	$	6,465,685	$	6,505,028

Nonaccrual and delinquent loans are affected by many factors, such as economic and business conditions, interest rates, unemployment levels, and real estate collateral values, among others. In periods of prolonged economic decline, borrowers may become more severely affected over time as liquidity levels decline and the borrower’s ability to continue to make payments deteriorates. With respect to real estate collateral values, the declines from the peak, as well as the value of the real estate at the time of origination versus the current value, can impact the level of problem loans. For instance, if the loan to value ratio at the time of renewal has increased due to the decline in the real estate value since origination, the loan may no longer meet the Bank’s underwriting standards and may be considered for classification as a problem loan dependent upon a review of risk factors.

Generally when a collateral dependent loan becomes impaired, an updated appraisal of the collateral, if appropriate, is obtained. If the impaired loan has not been upgraded to a performing status within a reasonable amount of time, the Bank will continue to obtain updated appraisals as deemed necessary, especially during periods of declining property values.

The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. All loan types are reported past due when one scheduled payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Credit Quality Indicators

The Bank uses a risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of its loan portfolio. Loan classifications are assessments made by the Bank of the status of the loans based on the facts and circumstances known to the Bank, including management’s judgment, at the time of assessment. Some or all of these classifications may change in the future if there are unexpected changes in the financial condition of the borrower, including but not limited to, changes resulting from continuing deterioration in general economic conditions on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Bank operates adversely affecting, among other things, real estate values. Such conditions, as well as other factors which adversely affect borrowers’ ability to service or repay loans, typically result in changes in loan default and charge-off rates, and increased provisions for loan losses, which would adversely affect the Company’s financial performance and financial condition. These circumstances are not entirely foreseeable and, as a result, it may not be possible to accurately reflect them in the Company’s analysis of credit risk. Generally, only commercial loans, including commercial real estate, other commercial and industrial loans, commercial ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt loans, and construction and land loans, are given a numerical grade.

A summary of the rating system used by the Bank, repeated here from Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary ~~Data—~~Data - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, follows:

Pass - All loans graded as pass are considered acceptable credit quality by the Bank and are grouped for purposes of calculating the allowance for loan losses. For residential, home equity and consumer loans, the Bank classifies loans as pass unless there is known information such as delinquency or client requests for modifications which, due to financial difficulty, would then generally result in a risk rating such as special mention or more severe depending on the factors.

Special Mention - Loans rated in this category are defined as having potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit or the Bank’s credit position. These loans are currently protected but have the potential to deteriorate to a substandard rating. For commercial loans, the borrower’s financial performance may be inconsistent or below forecast, creating the possibility of liquidity problems and shrinking debt service coverage. In loans having this rating, the primary source of repayment is still good, but there is increasing reliance on collateral or guarantor support. Collectability of the loan is not yet in jeopardy. In particular, loans in this category are considered more variable than other categories, since they will typically migrate through categories more quickly.

Substandard - Loans rated in this category are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. A substandard credit has a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans may be either still accruing or nonaccruing depending upon the severity of the risk and other factors such as the value of the collateral, if any, and past due status.

Doubtful - Loans rated in this category indicate that collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, is highly questionable and improbable. Loans in this category are usually on nonaccrual and classified as impaired.

The following tables present the loan portfolio’s credit risk profile by internally assigned grade and class of receivable as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018
	By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing Classified (1)		Nonaccrual Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	548,827	$	11,904	$	20,515	$	1,968	$	583,214
Commercial tax-exempt	431,918		2,837		4,052		—		438,807
Commercial real estate	2,322,294		47,195		29,045		546		2,399,080
Construction and land	191,608		5,470		446		—		197,524
Residential	2,854,759		—		1,322		6,798		2,862,879
Home equity	90,617		—		—		2,773		93,390
Consumer and other	145,514		—		—		12		145,526
Total	$	6,585,537	$	67,406	$	55,380	$	12,097	$	6,720,420

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	December 31, 2017
	By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing Classified (1)		Nonaccrual Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	496,395	$	12,898	$	10,951	$	748	$	520,992
Commercial tax-exempt	413,139		5,559		—		—		418,698
Commercial real estate	2,346,833		56,947		34,455		1,985		2,440,220
Construction and land	146,514		11,770		6,596		110		164,990
Residential	2,672,714		—		1,349		8,470		2,682,533
Home equity	97,118		—		—		2,840		99,958
Consumer and other	177,494		—		1		142		177,637
Total	$	6,350,207	$	87,174	$	53,352	$	14,295	$	6,505,028

______________________


(1)	Accruing Classified includes both Substandard and Doubtful classifications.

September 30, 2017
By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
Pass Special Mention Accruing Substandard Nonaccrual Loans Total
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial $ 598,691
$ 10,459
$ 8,138
$ 968
$ 618,256
Commercial tax exempt 425,759
5,591
—
—
431,350
Commercial real estate 2,265,871
57,381
37,306
2,601
2,363,159
Construction and land 106,154
5,243
6,688
206
118,291
Residential 2,590,665
—
1,358
8,765
2,600,788
Home equity 106,165
—
—
1,062
107,227
Consumer and other 173,858
—
251
21
174,130
Total $ 6,267,163
$ 78,674
$ 53,741
$ 13,623
$ 6,413,201

December 31, 2016
By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
Pass Special Mention Accruing Substandard Nonaccrual Loans Total
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial $ 591,388
$ 10,133
$ 9,277
$ 572
$ 611,370
Commercial tax exempt 388,544
10,060
—
—
398,604
Commercial real estate 2,230,732
17,233
49,696
4,583
2,302,244
Construction and land 101,254
109
3,297
179
104,839
Residential 2,367,554
—
1,399
10,908
2,379,861
Home equity 117,745
—
—
1,072
118,817
Consumer and other 198,616
—
2
1
198,619
Total $ 5,995,833
$ 37,535
$ 63,671
$ 17,315
$ 6,114,354

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present, by class of receivable, the balance of impaired loans with and without a related allowance, the associated allowance for those impaired loans with a related allowance, and the total unpaid principal on impaired loans:


	As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017														As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018
	Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		QTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Average Recorded Investment		QTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		YTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		QTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Average Recorded Investment		QTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		YTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,371	$	1,988	n/a		$	1,626	$	1,665	$	18	$	43	$	1,150	$	2,083	n/a		$	1,617	$	1,730	$	33	$	55
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		n/a		—		1,301		—		80
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	2,463		5,972		n/a		2,690		3,465		107		1,077		1,625		2,966		n/a		2,526		2,439		583		633
Construction and land	207		241		n/a		218		191		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		66		—		16
Residential	8,859		9,231		n/a		9,069		8,938		98		277		7,097		7,457		n/a		10,102		10,002		146		335
Home equity	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		1,056		—		24
Consumer and other	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	12,900		17,432		n/a		13,603		15,560		223		1,477		9,872		12,506		n/a		14,245		15,293		762		1,063
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	598		598		$	242	149		60		1		1		1,635		1,638		$	577	625		322		4		6
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	6,911		7,341		415		6,955		7,012		76		247		—		—		—		4,045		5,314		476		704
Construction and land	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential	1,200		1,200		127		2,175		2,938		18		80		682		681		74		734		787		5		17
Home equity	36		36		21		36		37		—		1		1,769		1,769		596		1,769		729		1		1
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		13		—		3
Subtotal	8,745		9,175		805		9,315		10,047		95		329		4,086		4,088		1,247		7,173		7,165		486		731
Total:
Commercial and industrial	1,969		2,586		242		1,775		1,725		19		44		2,785		3,721		577		2,242		2,052		37		61
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		1,301		—		80
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	9,374		13,313		415		9,645		10,477		183		1,324		1,625		2,966		—		6,571		7,753		1,059		1,337
Construction and land	207		241		—		218		191		—		—		—		—		—		—		66		—		16
Residential	10,059		10,431		127		11,244		11,876		116		357		7,779		8,138		74		10,836		10,789		151		352
Home equity	36		36		21		36		37		—		1		1,769		1,769		596		1,769		1,785		1		25
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		13		—		3
Total	$	21,645	$	26,607	$	805	$	22,918	$	25,607	$	318	$	1,806	$	13,958	$	16,594	$	1,247	$	21,418	$	22,458	$	1,248	$	1,794

_____________________


(1)	Recorded investment represents the client loan balance net of historical charge-offs and historical nonaccrual interest paid, if applicable, which was applied to principal.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


	As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016														As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017
	Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		QTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Average Recorded Investment		QTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		YTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		QTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Average Recorded Investment		QTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		YTD Interest Income Recognized while Impaired
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	11,742	$	13,874	n/a		$	10,774	$	6,325	$	98	$	169	$	1,371	$	1,988	n/a		$	1,626	$	1,665	$	18	$	43
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		n/a		—		1,301		—		80
Commercial real estate	5,966		11,148		n/a		7,288		9,672		332		874		2,463		5,972		n/a		2,690		3,465		107		1,077
Construction and land	224		548		n/a		400		1,332		48		48		207		241		n/a		218		191		—		—
Residential	6,472		6,832		n/a		7,345		7,345		59		173		8,859		9,231		n/a		9,069		8,938		98		277
Home equity	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—
Consumer and other	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	24,404		32,402		n/a		25,807		24,674		537		1,264		12,900		17,432		n/a		13,603		15,560		223		1,477
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	37		37		$	22	37		33		—		1		598		598		$	242	149		60		1		1
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	7,164		7,593		593		7,194		7,259		79		237		6,911		7,341		415		6,955		7,012		76		247
Construction and land	—		—		—		—		660		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential	6,877		6,877		701		5,977		5,994		36		115		1,200		1,200		127		2,175		2,938		18		80
Home equity	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		36		36		21		36		37		—		1
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	14,078		14,507		1,316		13,208		13,946		115		353		8,745		9,175		805		9,315		10,047		95		329
Total:
Commercial and industrial	11,779		13,911		22		10,811		6,358		98		170		1,969		2,586		242		1,775		1,725		19		44
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt															—		—		—		—		1,301		—		80
Commercial real estate	13,130		18,741		593		14,482		16,931		411		1,111		9,374		13,313		415		9,645		10,477		183		1,324
Construction and land	224		548		—		400		1,992		48		48		207		241		—		218		191		—		—
Residential	13,349		13,709		701		13,322		13,339		95		288		10,059		10,431		127		11,244		11,876		116		357
Home equity	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		36		36		21		36		37		—		1
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	38,482	$	46,909	$	1,316	$	39,015	$	38,620	$	652	$	1,617	$	21,645	$	26,607	$	805	$	22,918	$	25,607	$	318	$	1,806

_____________________


(1)	Recorded investment represents the client loan balance net of historical charge-offs and historical nonaccrual interest paid, if applicable, which was applied to principal.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2016										As of and for the year ended December 31, 2017
	Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized while Impaired		Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized while Impaired
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,793	$	2,155	n/a		$	5,288	$	249	$	1,434	$	2,238	n/a		$	1,594	$	50
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		n/a		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt											—		—		n/a		1,001		80
Commercial real estate	4,488		9,647		n/a		8,520		1,032		1,832		3,453		n/a		3,098		1,546
Construction and land	179		507		n/a		1,069		48		109		109		n/a		172		—
Residential	8,134		8,506		n/a		7,446		211		9,337		9,709		n/a		9,033		360
Home equity	—		—		n/a		—		—		1,779		1,779		n/a		413		—
Consumer and other	—		—		n/a		—		—		—		—		n/a		—		—
Subtotal	14,594		20,815		n/a		22,323		1,540		14,491		17,288		n/a		15,311		2,036
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	—		—		$	—	31		1		242		242		$	58	156		4
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt											—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	7,115		7,544		548		7,230		314		6,855		7,284		362		6,980		322
Construction and land	—		—		—		507		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential	4,284		4,284		565		5,505		143		828		828		89		2,469		89
Home equity	37		37		22		3		—		36		36		20		36		1
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		125		250		125		10		—
Subtotal	11,436		11,865		1,135		13,276		458		8,086		8,640		654		9,651		416
Total:
Commercial and industrial	1,793		2,155		—		5,319		250		1,676		2,480		58		1,750		54
Commercial tax exempt	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial tax-exempt											—		—		—		1,001		80
Commercial real estate	11,603		17,191		548		15,750		1,346		8,687		10,737		362		10,078		1,868
Construction and land	179		507		—		1,576		48		109		109		—		172		—
Residential	12,418		12,790		565		12,951		354		10,165		10,537		89		11,502		449
Home equity	37		37		22		3		—		1,815		1,815		20		449		1
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—		125		250		125		10		—
Total	$	26,030	$	32,680	$	1,135	$	35,599	$	1,998	$	22,577	$	25,928	$	654	$	24,962	$	2,452

_____________________


(1)	Recorded investment represents the client loan balance net of historical charge-offs and historical nonaccrual interest paid, if applicable, which was applied to principal.

When management determines that it is probable that the Bank will not collect all principal and interest on a loan in accordance with the original loan terms, the loan is designated as impaired.

Loans that are designated as impaired require an analysis to determine the amount of impairment, if any. Impairment would be indicated as a result of the carrying value of the loan exceeding either the estimated collateral value, less costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans or the net present value of the projected cash flow, discounted at the loan’s contractual effective interest rate, for loans not considered to be collateral dependent. Generally, shortfalls in the analysis on collateral dependent loans would result in the impairment amount being charged-off to the allowance for loan losses. Shortfalls on cash flow dependent loans may be carried as specific allocations to the general reserve unless a known loss is determined to have occurred, in which case such known loss is charged-off.

Loans in the held for sale category are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate and are excluded from the allowance for loan losses analysis.

As of September 30, 2018, the Bank has pledged $2.6 billion of loans in a blanket lien agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank. The Bank also has $570.1 million of loans pledged as collateral at the Federal Reserve Bank for access to

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

their discount window. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had pledged $2.5 billion of loans to the FHLB and $572.1 million of loans at the FRB.

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

forgiveness. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, TDRs totaled ~~$14.7~~$8.2 million and ~~$18.1~~$13.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2017, $11.5~~2018, $5.2 million of the ~~$14.7~~$8.2 million in TDRs were on accrual status. As of December 31, ~~2016, $12.4~~2017, $11.1 million of the ~~$18.1~~$13.6 million in TDRs were on accrual status.

Since all TDR loans are considered impaired loans, they are individually evaluated for impairment. The resulting impairment, if any, would have an impact on the allowance for loan losses as a specific reserve or charge-off. If, prior to the classification as a TDR, the loan was not impaired, there would have been a general or allocated reserve on the particular loan. Therefore, depending upon the result of the impairment analysis, there could be an increase or decrease in the related allowance for loan losses. Many loans initially categorized as TDRs are already on nonaccrual status and are already considered impaired. Therefore, there is generally not a material change to the allowance for loan losses when a nonaccruing loan is categorized as a TDR.

~~The following tables present the balance of TDRs that were restructured or defaulted during the periods indicated and the types of concessions granted:~~



	As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2018
	Restructured Current Quarter					TDRs that defaulted in the Current Quarter that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
	(In thousands, except number of loans)
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—		—	—
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		—	—
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential (1)	1	2,072		2,107		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	1	$	2,072	$	2,107	—	$	—

As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017

Restructured in the current
quarter and year to date
TDRs that defaulted
that were
restructured in prior twelve months

# of
Loans

Pre-
modification
recorded
investment

Post-
modification
recorded
investment

# of
Loans

Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial —
$ —
$ —
—
$ —
Commercial tax exempt —
—
�� —
—
—
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
Construction and land —
—
—
—
—
Residential (1) 1
108
109
—
—
Home equity —
—
—
—
—
Consumer and other —
—
—
—
—
Total 1
$ 108
$ 109
—
$ —

~~_____________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~Represents the following concession: temporary rate reduction.~~



	As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2018
	Restructured Current Quarter					TDRs that defaulted in the Current Quarter that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
	(In thousands, except number of loans)
Commercial and industrial (2)	1	$	100	$	100	—	$	—
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—		—	—
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		—	—
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential (1)	1	2,072		2,107		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	2	$	2,172	$	2,207	—	$	—

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017
	Restructured in the current quarter and year to date					TDRs that defaulted that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
	(In thousands, except number of loans)
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—		—	—
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		—	—
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential (1)	1	108		109		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	1	$	108	$	109	—	$	—

As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2016
Restructured in the current quarter
TDRs that defaulted
that were
restructured in prior twelve months

# of
Loans

Pre-
modification
recorded
investment

Post-
modification
recorded
investment

# of
Loans

Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial —
$ —
$ —
—
$ —
Commercial tax exempt —
—
—
—
—
Commercial real estate —
—
—
1
1,276
Construction and land —
—
—
—
—
Residential —
—
—
—
—
Home equity —
—
—
—
—
Consumer and other —
—
—
—
—
Total —
$ —
$ —
1
$ 1,276

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
Restructured in the current year to date
TDRs that defaulted
that were
restructured in prior twelve months

# of
Loans

Pre-
modification
recorded
investment

Post-
modification
recorded
investment

# of
Loans

Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial 3
$ 7,384
$ 7,209
—
$ —
Commercial tax exempt —
—
—
—
—
Commercial real estate 1
1,276
1,276
1
1,276
Construction and land —
—
—
—
—
Residential 2
260
261
—
—
Home equity —
—
—
—
—
Consumer and other —
—
—
—
—
Total 6
$ 8,920
$ 8,746
1
$ 1,276

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
Extension of term Temporary rate reduction Payment deferral Combination of concessions (1) Total concessions
# of
Loans
Post-
modifi-
cation
recorded
invest-
ment
# of
Loans Post-
modifi-
cation
recorded
invest-
ment # of
Loans Post-
modifi-
cation
recorded
invest-
ment # of
Loans Post-
modifi-
cation
recorded
invest-
ment # of
Loans Post-
modifi-
cation
recorded
invest-
ment
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial 2
$ 7,209
—
$ —
—
$ —
1
$ —
3
$ 7,209
Commercial tax exempt —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
1
1,276
1
1,276
Construction and land —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential —
—
2
261
—
—
—
—
2
261
Home equity —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer and other —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~_____________________~~______________________


(1)	~~Combination~~Represents the following type of ~~concessions includes loans that have had more than one modification, including extension of term,~~concession: temporary reduction of interest ~~rate, and/or payment deferral.~~rate.


(2)	Represents the following type of concession: extension of term.

Loan participations serviced for others and loans serviced for others are not included in the Company’s total loans. The following table presents a summary of the loan participations serviced for others and loans serviced for others based on class of receivable as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	8,085	$	8,484
Commercial tax-exempt	19,242		19,805
Commercial real estate	49,005		49,783
Construction and land	33,425		37,840
Total loan participations serviced for others	$	109,757	$	115,912

Residential	$	36,634	$	41,440
Total loans serviced for others	$	36,634	$	41,440

Total loans include deferred loan origination (fees)/ costs, net, of $7.6 million and $6.9 million as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

7. Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of outstanding loan balances, and totaled ~~$74.9~~$73.5 million and ~~$78.1~~$74.7 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

~~The following tables present a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:~~

As of and for the three months ended September 30, As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period:
Commercial and industrial $ 11,672
$ 13,246
$ 12,751
$ 15,814
Commercial real estate 48,136
45,507
50,412
44,215
Construction and land 3,585
4,740
3,039
6,322
Residential 10,282
10,752
10,449
10,544
Home equity 929
1,139
1,035
1,085
Consumer and other 405
369
391
520
Total allowance for loan losses, beginning of period 75,009
75,753
78,077
78,500
Loans charged-off:
Commercial and industrial —
(285 ) (218 ) (2,393 )
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
Construction and land —
—
—
(400 )
Residential —
—
(58 ) (501 )
Home equity —
—
—
—
Consumer and other (38 ) (52 ) (283 ) (78 )
Total charge-offs (38 ) (337 ) (559 ) (3,372 )

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following table presents a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:


	As of and for the three months ended September 30,						As of and for the nine months ended September 30,						As of and for the three months ended September 30,						As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
													(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period:
Commercial and industrial													$	12,381		$	11,672		$	11,735		$	12,751
Commercial real estate													45,183			48,136			46,820			50,412
Construction and land													4,613			3,585			4,949			3,039
Residential													9,804			10,282			9,773			10,449
Home equity													1,336			929			835			1,035
Consumer and other													147			405			630			391
Total allowance for loan losses, beginning of period													73,464			75,009			74,742			78,077
Loans charged-off:
Commercial and industrial													—			—			(339		)	(218		)
Commercial real estate													—			—			(135		)	—
Construction and land													—			—			—			—
Residential													—			—			(16		)	(58		)
Home equity													—			—			—			—
Consumer and other													—			(38		)	(39		)	(283		)
Total charge-offs													—			(38		)	(529		)	(559		)
	(In thousands)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:
Commercial and industrial	241			81			395			1,457			153			241			387			395
Commercial real estate	76			1,767			3,605			5,709			820			76			995			3,605
Construction and land	13			490			13			1,117			—			13			—			13
Residential	—			49			47			53			—			—			27			47
Home equity	—			—			—			—			—			—			1			—
Consumer and other	4			4			22			11			12			4			168			22
Total recoveries	334			2,391			4,082			8,347			985			334			1,578			4,082
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses:
Commercial and industrial	973			859			(42		)	(977		)	1,921			973			2,672			(42		)
Commercial real estate	(1,173		)	1,038			(6,978		)	(1,612		)	(3,179		)	(1,173		)	(4,856		)	(6,978		)
Construction and land	182			(2,086		)	728			(3,895		)	172			182			(164		)	728
Residential	(431		)	103			(587		)	808			144			(431		)	164			(587		)
Home equity	(15		)	(62		)	(121		)	(8		)	6			(15		)	506			(121		)
Consumer and other	32			10			273			(122		)	(13		)	32			(613		)	273
Total provision/(credit) for loan losses	(432		)	(138		)	(6,727		)	(5,806		)	(949		)	(432		)	(2,291		)	(6,727		)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period:
Commercial and industrial	12,886			13,901			12,886			13,901			14,455			12,886			14,455			12,886
Commercial real estate	47,039			48,312			47,039			48,312			42,824			47,039			42,824			47,039
Construction and land	3,780			3,144			3,780			3,144			4,785			3,780			4,785			3,780
Residential	9,851			10,904			9,851			10,904			9,948			9,851			9,948			9,851
Home equity	914			1,077			914			1,077			1,342			914			1,342			914
Consumer and other	403			331			403			331			146			403			146			403
Total allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	74,873		$	77,669		$	74,873		$	77,669		$	73,500		$	74,873		$	73,500		$	74,873

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the inherent risk of loss in the loan portfolio as of the consolidated balance sheet dates. Management estimates the level of the allowance based on all relevant information available. Changes to the required level in the allowance result in either a provision for loan loss expense, if an increase is required, or a credit to the provision, if a decrease is required. Loan losses are charged to the allowance when available information confirms that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible. Recoveries on loans previously charged-off are credited to the allowance when received in cash.

The provision/ (credit) for loan losses and related balance in the allowance for loan losses for ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt commercial and industrial loans are included with commercial and industrial. The provision/ (credit) for loan losses and related balance in the allowance for loan losses for ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt commercial real estate loans are included with commercial real estate. There were no charge-offs or recoveries, for any period presented, for both commercial and industrial and commercial real estate ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt loans.

The following tables present the Company’s allowance for loan losses and loan portfolio at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 by portfolio segment, disaggregated by method of impairment analysis. The Company had no loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 or December 31, ~~2016~~.2017.



	September 30, 2018
	Individually Evaluated for Impairment				Collectively Evaluated for Impairment				Total
	Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses		Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses		Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	2,785	$	577	$	1,019,236	$	13,878	$	1,022,021	$	14,455
Commercial real estate	1,625		—		2,397,455		42,824		2,399,080		42,824
Construction and land	—		—		197,524		4,785		197,524		4,785
Residential	7,779		74		2,855,100		9,874		2,862,879		9,948
Home equity	1,769		596		91,621		746		93,390		1,342
Consumer and other	—		—		145,526		146		145,526		146
Total	$	13,958	$	1,247	$	6,706,462	$	72,253	$	6,720,420	$	73,500



	December 31, 2017
	Individually Evaluated for Impairment				Collectively Evaluated for Impairment				Total
	Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses		Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses		Recorded investment (loan balance)		Allowance for loan losses
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	1,676	$	58	$	938,014	$	11,677	$	939,690	$	11,735
Commercial real estate	8,687		362		2,431,533		46,458		2,440,220		46,820
Construction and land	109		—		164,881		4,949		164,990		4,949
Residential	10,165		89		2,672,368		9,684		2,682,533		9,773
Home equity	1,815		20		98,143		815		99,958		835
Consumer and other	125		125		177,512		505		177,637		630
Total	$	22,577	$	654	$	6,482,451	$	74,088	$	6,505,028	$	74,742

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

September 30, 2017

Individually Evaluated
for Impairment

Collectively Evaluated
for Impairment
Total

Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial $ 1,969
$ 242
$ 1,047,637
$ 12,644
$ 1,049,606
$ 12,886
Commercial real estate 9,374
415
2,353,785
46,624
2,363,159
47,039
Construction and land 207
—
118,084
3,780
118,291
3,780
Residential 10,059
127
2,590,729
9,724
2,600,788
9,851
Home equity 36
21
107,191
893
107,227
914
Consumer —

174,130
403
174,130
403
Total $ 21,645
$ 805
$ 6,391,556
$ 74,068
$ 6,413,201
$ 74,873

December 31, 2016

Individually Evaluated
for Impairment

Collectively Evaluated
for Impairment
Total

Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
Recorded investment
(loan balance)
Allowance for loan losses
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial $ 1,793
$ —
$ 1,008,181
$ 12,751
$ 1,009,974
$ 12,751
Commercial real estate 11,603
548
2,290,641
49,864
2,302,244
50,412
Construction and land 179
—
104,660
3,039
104,839
3,039
Residential 12,418
565
2,367,443
9,884
2,379,861
10,449
Home equity 37
22
118,780
1,013
118,817
1,035
Consumer —
—
198,619
391
198,619
391
Total $ 26,030
$ 1,135
$ 6,088,324
$ 76,942
$ 6,114,354
$ 78,077

8. Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and, to a lesser extent, the use of derivative financial instruments. ~~Additionally, as a service to its customers, the Company may utilize derivative instruments such as customer foreign exchange forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange risk, if any.~~ Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are generally determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to certain loans, deposits, and borrowings. As a service to its customers, the Company may utilize

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes~~derivative instruments including customer foreign exchange forward contracts to ~~Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

manage its foreign exchange risk, if any.

The following table presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:


	September 30, 2017							December 31, 2016							September 30, 2018							December 31, 2017
	Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives				Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives				Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives				Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives
	Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)			Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)			Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)			Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate products	Other assets	$	39	Other liabilities	$	(360	)	Other assets	$	—	Other liabilities	$	(1,040	)	Other assets	$	903	Other liabilities	$	—		Other assets	$	555	Other liabilities	$	(80	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate products	Other assets	15,314		Other liabilities	(15,536		)	Other assets	17,032		Other liabilities	(16,560		)	Other assets	27,792		Other liabilities	(28,209		)	Other assets	18,575		Other liabilities	(18,953		)
Foreign exchange contracts															Other assets	—		Other liabilities	—			Other assets	2		Other liabilities	(2		)
Risk participation agreements	Other assets	1		Other liabilities	(137		)	Other assets	15		Other liabilities	(6		)	Other assets	20		Other liabilities	(90		)	Other assets	1		Other liabilities	(108		)
Total		$	15,354		$	(16,033	)		$	17,047		$	(17,606	)		$	28,715		$	(28,299	)		$	19,133		$	(19,143	)

_____________________


(1)	For additional details, see Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial ~~Statements-Note~~Statements - Note 5: Fair Value Measurements.”

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

The following tables present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments ~~in the consolidated statements of operations~~on accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives (effective portion) (1)				Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)		Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)								Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives (1)							Location of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income		Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income
	Three months ended September 30,					Three months ended September 30,								Three months ended September 30,									Three months ended September 30,
	2017		2016			2017				2016				2018				2017					2018				2017
(In thousands)
															(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Interest rate products	$	121	$	663		Interest expense		$	(293	)		$	(405	)		$	(193	)		$	121		Interest expense		$	(101	)		$	(293	)
Total	$	121	$	663			$	(293	)		$	(405	)		$	(193	)		$	121				$	(101	)		$	(293	)

~~_____________________~~____________________


(1)	There was an additional $(1) thousand loss related to the ineffective portion for the three months ended as of September 30, ~~2017 and a $(19) thousand loss related to the ineffective portion for the three months ended as of September 30, 2016.~~2017.

Derivatives in cash
flow hedging
relationships
Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives (effective portion) (1) Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)
Nine months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands)
Interest rate products $ (237 ) $ (1,928 ) Interest expense $ (953 ) $ (1,319 )
Total $ (237 ) $ (1,928 ) $ (953 ) $ (1,319 )

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives (1)					Location of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income	Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income
	Nine months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2018		2017				2018			2017
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Interest rate products	$	818	$	(237	)	Interest expense	$	(385	)	$	(953	)
Total	$	818	$	(237	)		$	(385	)	$	(953	)

____________________

(1)

There was an additional $(3) thousand loss related to the ineffective portion for the nine months ended as of September 30, ~~2017 and~~2017. The guidance in ASU 2017-12 requires that amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income that are included in the assessment of effectiveness should be reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the hedged forecasted transactions impact earnings. Transition guidance for this ASU further states that upon adoption, previously recorded cumulative ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges existing at the adoption date be eliminated by means of a ~~$26~~cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date. There was a $5 thousand ~~gain~~reclassification related to the ~~ineffective portion for the nine months ended as~~adoption of ~~September 30, 2016.~~ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018.

The following table presents the ~~components~~effect of the Company’s ~~accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) related to~~derivative financial instruments in the ~~derivatives~~consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands)
Accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) on cash flow hedges, balance at beginning of period $ (429 ) $ (2,109 ) $ (605 ) $ (1,123 )
Net change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges 242
628
418
(358 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) on cash flow hedges, balance at end of period $ (187 ) $ (1,481 ) $ (187 ) $ (1,481 )



	Location of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income	Amount of (gain) or loss recognized in income on cash flow hedging relationships				Amount of (gain) or loss recognized in income on cash flow hedging relationships
		Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
		2018			2017	2018			2017
		(In thousands)
Total amounts of (income) and expense line items presented in the statement of operations in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded	Interest expense	$	(101	)	n/a	$	(385	)	n/a
The effects of cash flow hedging:
(Gain) or loss on cash flow hedging relationships in ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, Subtopic 20 Hedging - general
Interest contracts - amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income	Interest expense	$	(101	)	n/a	$	(385	)	n/a

The Bank has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain provisions where, if the Bank defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Bank could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Bank was in compliance with these provisions as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Bank also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions where, if the Bank fails to maintain its status as a well- or adequately-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Bank would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. The Bank was in compliance with these provisions as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Certain of the Bank’s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions where, if specified, events or conditions occur that materially change the Bank’s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the Bank may be required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instruments. The Bank was in compliance with these provisions as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

As of September 30, ~~2017 and December 31, 2016, the~~2018 there were no termination amounts related to collateral determinations of derivatives in a liability position ~~were $3.6 million~~ and ~~$3.4 million, respectively.~~as of December 31, 2017, the termination amount was $3.1 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative counterparties and pledged securities with market values of ~~$5.6~~$1.1 million and ~~$1.9~~$2.3 million, respectively, as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017, against its obligations under these agreements. The collateral posted is typically greater than the current liability position; however, due to timing of liability position changes at period end, the funding of a collateral shortfall may take place shortly following period end.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest income and expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company has entered into interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed payments. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps to hedge London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) -indexed brokered deposits and the LIBOR component of the total cost of certain FHLB borrowings.

To accomplish this objective and strategy, the Bank has entered into a total of ~~seven~~five interest rate swaps, two during 2017 with effective dates of March 22, 2017 and ~~five~~three during 2013 with effective dates of ~~December~~August 1, ~~2014, September 2, 2014,~~2013, June 1, 2014, and March 1, ~~2014, and August 1, 2013.~~2014.

The two interest rate swaps entered into during 2017 have notional amounts of $40 million and $60 million with terms of 1.75 and 2.25 years, respectively. These interest rate swaps will effectively fix the Bank’s interest payments on $100 million in interest-related cash outflows attributable to changes in the LIBOR component of FHLB borrowing liabilities at rates of 1.55% and 1.65%, respectively, with a weighted average rate of 1.61%. The borrowings hedged will initially be expected to be issuances and quarterly rollovers of ~~3-month~~three-month FHLB advances but may also then include future issuances of ~~3-month~~three-month repurchase agreements with similar characteristics and/or future issuances of either floating or fixed rate borrowings that are issued with the specific intent to replace the quarterly rollovers of the advances or repurchase agreements.

The ~~five~~three interest rate swaps entered into during 2013 each have a notional amount of $25 million and have terms ranging from ~~three~~five to six years from their respective effective dates. The interest rate swaps effectively fix the Bank’s interest payments on ~~$125~~$75 million of its LIBOR-indexed deposit liabilities at rates between 1.68% and ~~2.32%~~2.03%, with a weighted average rate of ~~1.98%~~1.82%.

~~The~~Prior to the implementation of ASU 2017-12, which was implemented on a modified retrospective basis on January 1, 2018, the Company ~~uses~~used the “Hypothetical Derivative Method” described in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), for quarterly prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness, as well as for measurements of hedge ineffectiveness. Under this method, the Company ~~assesses~~assessed the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative iswas initially reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings in interest and dividend income when the hedged transactions affect earnings. Ineffectiveness resulting from the hedge iswas recorded as a gain or loss in the consolidated statement of operations as part of fees and other income. ~~There was an immaterial amount~~

Upon implementation of ~~hedge ineffectiveness~~ASU 2017-12, for derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period during which the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company monitors the risk of counterparty default on an ongoing basis.~~

hedged transaction affects earnings. A portion of the balance reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made or received on the Company’s interest rate swaps. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million will be reclassified as ~~an increase~~a decrease in interest expense. The Company monitors the risk of counterparty default on an ongoing basis.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Non-designated Hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from ~~two~~ different services the Bank provides to qualified commercial clients. The Bank offers certain derivative products directly to such clients. The Bank economically hedges derivative transactions executed with commercial clients by entering into mirror-image, offsetting derivatives with third parties. Derivative transactions executed as part of these programs are not designated in ASC 815-qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, marked-to-market through earnings each period. Because the derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, the changes in fair value substantially offset through earnings. The net effect on earnings is primarily driven by changes in the credit valuation adjustment (“CVA”). The CVA represents the dollar amount of fair value adjustment related to nonperformance risk of both the Bank and its counterparties. Fees earned in connection with the execution of derivatives related to this program are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in other income. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Bank had ~~138~~156 and ~~136~~142 derivatives, respectively, related to this program, comprised of interest rate swaps and caps, with an aggregate notional amount of $1.2 billion as of September 30, 2018 and $1.1 billion ~~for each period.~~as of December 31, 2017. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there were no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding related to this program, and as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, there ~~was one~~were three foreign currency exchange ~~contract~~contracts with an aggregate notional amount of ~~less than $0.1~~$0.2 million.

In addition, as a participant lender, the Bank has guaranteed performance on the pro-rated portion of swaps executed by other financial institutions. As the participant lender, the Bank is providing a partial guarantee, but is not a direct party to the related swap transactions. The Bank has no obligations under the risk participation agreements unless the borrower defaults on their swap transaction with the lead bank and the swap is in a liability position to the borrower. In that instance, the Bank has agreed to pay the lead bank a portion of the swap’s termination value at the time of the default. The derivative transactions entered into as part of these agreements are not designated, as per ASC 815, as qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, marked-to-market through earnings each period. As of September 30, 2018, there were seven of these risk participation transactions with an aggregate notional amount of $60.0 million and, as of December 31, 2017, there were six of these risk participation transactions with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$48.1 million and, as of December 31, 2016, there were two of these risk participation transactions with an aggregate notional amount of $13.3~~$48.0 million.

The Bank has also participated out to ~~another~~other financial ~~institution~~institutions a pro-rated portion of ~~two~~ swaps executed by the Bank. The other financial institution has no obligations under the risk participation agreements unless the borrowers default on their swap transactions with the Bank and the swaps are in liability positions to the borrower. In those instances, the other financial institution has agreed to pay the Bank a portion of the swap’s termination value at the time of the default. The derivative transactions entered into as part of these agreements are not designated, as per ASC 815, as qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, marked-to-market through earnings each period. ~~The pro-rated notional amount~~As of September 30, 2018, there were three of these risk participation transactions ~~was $6.1~~with a pro-rated notional amount of $11.5 million and, as of ~~both September 30, 2017 and~~ December 31, ~~2016.~~2017, there were two of these risk participation transactions with a pro-rated notional amount of $6.1 million.

The following table presents the effect of the Bank’s derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.


		Amount of gain or (loss), net, recognized in income on derivatives													Amount of gain or (loss), net, recognized in income on derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	Location of gain or (loss) recognized in income on derivatives	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Location of gain or (loss) recognized in income on derivatives	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		2017			2016			2017			2016				2018		2017			2018			2017
		(In thousands)													(In thousands)
Interest rate products	Other income/ (expense)	$	(49	)	$	1,224		$	(695	)	$	(935	)	Other income/ (expense)	$	8	$	(49	)	$	(39	)	$	(695	)
Risk participation agreements	Other income/ (expense)	5			(7		)	325			6			Other income/ (expense)	18		5			238			325
Total		$	(44	)	$	1,217		$	(370	)	$	(929	)		$	26	$	(44	)	$	199		$	(370	)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

9. Income Taxes

The following table presents the components of income tax expense for continuing operations, discontinued operations, noncontrolling interests and the Company:


	Nine months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations:
Income before income taxes	$	82,985		$	76,444		$	77,214		$	82,985
Income tax expense	24,805			23,716			28,886			24,805
Net income from continuing operations	$	58,180		$	52,728		$	48,328		$	58,180
Effective tax rate, continuing operations	29.9		%	31.0		%	37.4		%	29.9		%

Income from discontinued operations:
Income before income taxes	$	6,631		$	7,432		$	2,388		$	6,631
Income tax expense	2,750			3,075			692			2,750
Net income from discontinued operations	$	3,881		$	4,357		$	1,696		$	3,881
Effective tax rate, discontinued operations	41.5		%	41.4		%	29.0		%	41.5		%

Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Income before income taxes	$	3,190		$	3,010		$	2,942		$	3,190
Income tax expense	—			—			—			—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	3,190		$	3,010		$	2,942		$	3,190
Effective tax rate, noncontrolling interests	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%

Income attributable to the Company
Income before income taxes	$	86,426		$	80,866		$	76,660		$	86,426
Income tax expense	27,555			26,791			29,578			27,555
Net income attributable to the Company	$	58,871		$	54,075		$	47,082		$	58,871
Effective tax rate attributable to the Company	31.9		%	33.1		%	38.6		%	31.9		%

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~29.9%~~37.4%, with related tax expense of $28.9 million, was calculated based on a projected 2018 annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was more than the statutory rate of 21% due primarily to the sale of Anchor and state and local income taxes. These items were partially offset by earnings from tax-exempt investments and income tax credits. The Company recorded tax expense of $12.7 million on the sale of Anchor in April 2018, which was primarily due to a book to tax basis difference associated with nondeductible goodwill.

On August 21, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued guidance (Notice 2018-68) on new rules regarding restrictions on public company deductions for executive compensation under Section 162(m). The IRS guidance involved the interpretation of the transition rule for written binding contracts that were in effect on November 2, 2017 as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) that was enacted on December 22, 2017. Based on the updated guidance, the Company recorded an additional tax expense of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2018 to comply with the guidance.

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of 29.9%, with related tax expense of $24.8 million, was calculated based on a projected 2017 annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was less than the statutory rate of 35% due primarily to earnings from tax-exempt investments, income tax credits, and income attributable to noncontrolling interests. These items were partially offset by state and local income taxes.

~~The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~ of ~~31.0%, with related tax expense of $23.7 million, was calculated based on a projected 2016 annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was less than the statutory rate of~~ ~~35%~~ ~~due primarily to earnings from tax-exempt investments, income tax credits, and income attributable to noncontrolling interests. These items were partially offset by state and local income taxes.~~

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is lower than the effective tax rate for the same period in 2016 due primarily to a projected increase in earnings from tax-exempt investments and loans in 2017 as compared to 2016.

In the first quarter of 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09. The impact of ASU 2016-09 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, was a decrease in income tax expense of $0.3 million due to the fair value at the time of vesting of share-based compensation as compared to the grant date fair value, partially offset by stock options expiring unexercised due to being out of the money. There was no significant change to the Company’s effective tax rate related to the adoption of this ASU.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was more than the effective tax rate for the same period in 2017 due primarily to the sale of Anchor. This item was partially offset by the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the Tax Act.

10. Noncontrolling Interests

At the Company, noncontrolling interests consist of equity owned by management of the Company’s respective majority-owned ~~affiliates.~~affiliates, Anchor, BOS, and DGHM, for the periods in which the Company had an ownership interest in them. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of operations represents the net income allocated to the noncontrolling interest owners of the affiliates. Net income allocated to the noncontrolling interest owners was $0.9 million and $1.1 million for ~~each of~~ the ~~three month~~three-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and ~~2016,~~$2.9 million and $3.2 million ~~and $3.0 million~~ for the ~~nine month~~nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

On the consolidated balance sheets, noncontrolling interests are included as the sum of the capital and undistributed profits allocated to the noncontrolling interest owners. Typically, this balance is included in a company’s permanent shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. When the noncontrolling interest owners’ rights include certain redemption features, as described in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, such redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified as mezzanine equity and are not included in permanent shareholders’ equity. Due to the redemption features of the noncontrolling interests, the Company had redeemable noncontrolling interests held in mezzanine equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ~~$15.9~~$11.7 million and ~~$17.0~~$17.5 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. The aggregate amount of such redeemable noncontrolling equity interests are recorded at the estimated maximum redemption values. In addition, the Company had ~~$4.8~~$2.2 million and ~~$4.2~~$5.2 million in noncontrolling interests included in permanent shareholder’s equity at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Each non-wholly owned affiliate operating agreement provides the Company and/or the noncontrolling interests with contingent call or put redemption features used for the orderly transfer of noncontrolling equity interests between the affiliate noncontrolling interest owners and the Company at either a contractually predetermined fair value; multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ~~(EBITDA)~~(“EBITDA”); or fair value. The Company may liquidate these noncontrolling interests in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or other forms of consideration dependent on the operating agreement. These agreements are discussed in Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data –- Note 14: Noncontrolling Interests” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Generally, these put and call redemption features refer to shareholder rights of both the Company and the noncontrolling interest owners of the Company’s majority-owned affiliate companies. The affiliate company noncontrolling interests generally take the form of limited liability company ~~(LLC)~~(“LLC”) units, profits interests, or common stock (collectively, the “noncontrolling equity interests”). In most circumstances, the put and call redemption features generally relate to the Company’s right and, in some cases, obligation to purchase and the noncontrolling equity interests’ right to sell their equity interests. There are various events that could cause the puts or calls to be exercised, such as a change in control, death, disability, retirement, resignation or termination. The puts and calls are generally to be exercised at the then fair value or a contractually agreed upon approximation thereof. The terms of these rights vary and are governed by the respective individual operating and legal documents.

The following table presents, by affiliate, the noncontrolling interests included as redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests in mezzanine and permanent equity, respectively, at the periods indicated:


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Anchor(1)	$	9,644	$	10,934	$	—	$	9,761
BOS	7,330		6,782		8,675		8,057
DGHM ~~(1)~~(2)	3,700		3,417		5,220		4,829
Total	$	20,674	$	21,133	$	13,895	$	22,647
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	$	15,882	$	16,972	$	11,686	$	17,461
Noncontrolling interests	$	4,792	$	4,161	$	2,209	$	5,186

_____________________


(1)	Assets and liabilities at Anchor were classified as held for sale on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017. The Company completed the sale of Anchor in April 2018.


(2)	Only includes redeemable noncontrolling interests.

~~(1) Only includes redeemable noncontrolling interests.~~

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present a rollforward of the Company’s redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended						Nine months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30, 2017						September 30, 2017						September 30, 2018						September 30, 2018
	Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Noncontrolling interests at beginning of period	$	17,216		$	4,375		$	16,972		$	4,161		$	10,747		$	1,996		$	17,461		$	5,186
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	802			272			2,385			805			711			213			2,202			740
Distributions	(869		)	(264		)	(2,414		)	(783		)	(687		)	(203		)	(2,136		)	(712		)
Purchases/ (sales) of ownership interests	103			85			235			85			—			—			(6,353		)	(3,051		)
Amortization of equity compensation	102			250			306			756			125			—			373			161
Adjustments to fair value	(1,472		)	74			(1,602		)	(232		)	790			203			139			(115		)
Noncontrolling interests at end of period	$	15,882		$	4,792		$	15,882		$	4,792		$	11,686		$	2,209		$	11,686		$	2,209


	Three months ended						Nine months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30, 2016						September 30, 2016						September 30, 2017						September 30, 2017
	Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests			Redeemable noncontrolling interests			Noncontrolling interests
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Noncontrolling interests at beginning of period	$	15,843		$	3,379		$	18,088		$	3,393		$	17,216		$	4,375		$	16,972		$	4,161
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	821			289			2,308			702			802			272			2,385			805
Distributions	(809		)	(252		)	(2,213		)	(692		)	(869		)	(264		)	(2,414		)	(783		)
Purchases/ (sales) of ownership interests	—			—			(766		)	(18		)	103			85			235			85
Amortization of equity compensation	115			237			302			501			102			250			306			756
Adjustments to fair value	229			129			(1,520		)	(104		)	(1,472		)	74			(1,602		)	(232		)
Noncontrolling interests at end of period	$	16,199		$	3,782		$	16,199		$	3,782		$	15,882		$	4,792		$	15,882		$	4,792

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents a summary of the amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


Description of component of accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss)	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Affected line item in Statement of Operations	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Affected line item in Statement of Operations
	2017			2016			2017			2016			Affected line item in Statement of Operations	2018			2017			2018			2017			Affected line item in Statement of Operations
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)							(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Adjustment for realized gains/ (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net:
Adjustment for realized (gains)/ losses on available-for-sale securities, net:
Pre-tax	$	230		$	273		$	486		$	519		Gain on sale of investments, net	$	—		$	(230	)	$	—		$	(486	)	(Gain)/ loss on sale of investments, net
Tax expense/ (benefit)	89			101			193			189			Income tax expense	—			89			—			193			Income tax expense/ (benefit)
Net	$	141		$	172		$	293		$	330		Net income attributable to the Company	$	��		$	(141	)	$	—		$	(293	)	Net (income)/ loss attributable to the Company
Net realized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges:
Hedges related to deposits:
Net realized (gain)/ loss on cash flow hedges:
Hedges related to deposits and borrowings:
Pre-tax	$	(293	)	$	(405	)	$	(953	)	$	(1,319	)	Interest expense on deposits	$	(101	)	$	293		$	(385	)	$	953		Interest (income)/ expense on deposits and borrowings
Pre-tax	(2		)	(19		)	(3		)	26			Other income	—			2			—			3			Other (income)/ expense
Tax expense/ (benefit)	(123		)	(175		)	(398		)	(532		)	Income tax expense	29			(123		)	112			(398		)	Income tax expense/ (benefit)
Net	$	(172	)	$	(249	)	$	(558	)	$	(761	)	Net income attributable to the Company	$	(72	)	$	172		$	(273	)	$	558		Net (income)/ loss attributable to the Company
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax	$	(31	)	$	(77	)	$	(265	)	$	(431	)		$	(72	)	$	31		$	(273	)	$	265

On January 1, 2018, the Company elected to early adopt ASU No. 2017-12. As a result, the Company reclassified unrealized losses on cash flow hedges of $5 thousand from accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) to beginning retained earnings.

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-01. As a result, the Company reclassified unrealized gains on equity securities available-for-sale, net of tax, of $339 thousand from accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) to beginning retained earnings.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	Components of accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss)
	Unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available-for-sale			Unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges			Unrealized gain/ (loss) on other			Accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss)
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	(11,194	)	$	(605	)	$	(749	)	$	(12,548	)
Other comprehensive income/ (loss) before reclassifications	7,588			(140		)	12			7,460
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income/ (loss)	(293		)	558			—			265
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	7,295			418			12			7,725
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	(3,899	)	$	(187	)	$	(737	)	$	(4,823	)

Balance at December 31, 2017	$	(8,140	)	$	332		$	(850	)	$	(8,658	)
Other comprehensive income/ (loss) before reclassifications	(18,888		)	574			1			(18,313		)
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income/ (loss)	—			(273		)	—			(273		)
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	(18,888		)	301			1			(18,586		)
Reclassification due to the adoption of ASUs 2017-12 and 2016-01	(339		)	5			—			(334		)
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	(27,367	)	$	638		$	(849	)	$	(27,578	)

12. Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company incurred restructuring charges related to the acquisition of Banyan Partners, LLC. The purpose of this restructuring was to realign the management structure within the Wealth Management and Trust segment. The total cost of the restructuring incurred in Q4 2014 was $0.7 million. In 2015, the Company incurred additional restructuring charges to further refine the management structure within the Wealth Management and Trust segment. The total cost of the restructuring charges in 2015 was $3.7 million.

In the first and second quarters of 2016, the Company incurred additional costs of $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in continued refinement of the management structure within the Wealth Management and Trust segment. The Company does not anticipate any additional restructuring costs related to this plan as of the date of this filing.

Restructuring expenses incurred since the plan of restructuring was first implemented in 2014 totaled $6.4 million, all within the Wealth Management and Trust segment.

In the third quarter of 2018, the Company incurred a restructuring charge of $5.8 million, in connection with a previously announced reduction in force to the Company’s workforce of approximately 7% of total staffing. The restructuring is intended to improve the Company’s operating efficiency and enhance earnings. Additional restructuring costs may be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2018.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following table presents a summary of the restructuring activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


							Total (1)
							(In thousands)
Accrued charges at December 31, 2017							$	337
Costs paid							(254		)
Accrued charges at March 31, 2018							83
Costs paid							(83		)
Accrued charges at June 30, 2018							—
Costs incurred							5,763
Costs paid							—
Accrued charges at September 30, 2018							$	5,763
	Severance Charges			Total
	(In thousands)
Accrued charges at December 31, 2016	$	1,977		$	1,977		$	1,977
Costs paid	(618		)	(618		)	(618		)
Accrued charges at March 31, 2017	1,359			1,359			1,359
Costs paid	(335		)	(335		)	(335		)
Accrued charges at June 30, 2017	1,024			1,024			1,024
Costs paid	(410		)	(410		)	(410		)
Accrued charges at September 30, 2017	$	614		$	614		$	614


Accrued charges at December 31, 2015	$	3,305		$	3,305
Costs incurred	1,112			1,112
Costs paid	(849		)	(849		)
Accrued charges at March 31, 2016	3,568			3,568
Costs incurred	905			905
Costs paid	(1,214		)	(1,214		)
Accrued charges at June 30, 2016	3,259			3,259
Costs paid	(552		)	(552		)
Accrued charges at September 30, 2016	$	2,707		$	2,707

_____________________


(1)	Restructuring charges consist solely of severance costs for all periods presented.

13. Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09 et al. As stated in Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” the implementation of the new standard did not have a material impact on the measurement or recognition of revenue; as such, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.

ASC 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including interest income on loans and investment securities. In addition, certain noninterest income such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, late fees, BOLI income, and derivatives are also not in scope of the new guidance. ASC 606 is applicable to noninterest income such as investment management fees, wealth advisory fees, wealth management and trust fees, and certain banking fees. However, the recognition of this revenue did not change upon adoption of ASC 606. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest income considered in-scope of ASC 606 is discussed below.

Investment management fees

Investment management fees are earned for the management of a series of accounts and funds in which clients invest directly, acting as a sub-advisor to larger investment management companies, or private client account management. The Company’s performance obligation is satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon either the beginning-of quarter (in advance) or quarter-end (in arrears) market value of the assets under management and advisory (“AUM”) and the applicable fee rate, depending on the terms of the contract. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company may earn performance-based incentives on certain contracts. Receivables are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in the fees receivable line item.

All of the investment management fee income on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is considered in-scope of ASC 606.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Wealth advisory fees

Wealth advisory fees are earned for providing financial advisory services to clients. The Company’s performance obligation under these contracts is satisfied over time as the financial advisory services are provided. Fees are recognized monthly based either on a fixed fee amount or are based on the quarter-end (in arrears) market value of the AUM and the applicable fee rate (“asset based fees”), depending on the terms of the contract. Payment on fixed fee contracts is received based on a schedule outlined in the contract, while payment on asset based fees are generally received a few days after quarter end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. No performance based incentives are earned on wealth advisory contracts. Receivables are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in the fees receivable line item. Deferred revenues related to the fixed fee contracts of $6.9 million and $6.6 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet within the other liabilities line item.

All of the wealth advisory fee income on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is considered in-scope of ASC 606.

Wealth management and trust fees

Wealth management and trust fees are earned for providing investment management, wealth management, retirement plan advisory, family office, financial planning, and trust services to clients. The Company’s performance obligation under these contracts is satisfied over time as the wealth management services are provided. Fees are recognized monthly based on the average monthly, beginning-of-quarter, or, for a small number of clients, end-of-quarter market value of the AUM and the applicable fee rate, depending on the terms of the contract. No performance based incentives are earned on wealth management contracts. Receivables are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in the fees receivable line item.

Trust fees are earned when the Company is appointed as trustee for clients. As trustee, the Company administers the client’s trust and manages the assets of the trust including investments and property. The Company’s performance obligation under these agreements is satisfied over time as the administration and management services are provided. Fees are recognized monthly or, in certain circumstances, quarterly based on a percentage of the market value of the account as outlined in the agreement. Payment frequency is defined in the individual contracts which primarily stipulate monthly in arrears. No performance based incentives are earned on trust fee contracts. Receivables are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in the fees receivable line item.

All of the wealth management and trust fee income on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is considered in-scope of ASC 606.

Other banking fee income

The Bank charges a variety of fees to its clients for services provided on the deposit and deposit management related accounts. Each fee is either transaction-based or assessed monthly. The types of fees include service charges on accounts, overdraft fees, maintenance fees, ATM fee charges, credit card charges, and other miscellaneous charges related to the accounts. These fees are not governed by individual contracts with clients. They are charges to clients based on disclosures presented to clients upon opening these accounts along with updated disclosures when changes are made to the fee structures. The transaction-based fees are recognized in revenue when charged to the client based on specific activity on the client’s account. Monthly service/maintenance charges are recognized in the month they are earned and are charged directly to the client’s account.

The Bank also charges fees for treasury activities such as foreign exchange fees for clients with a banking relationship. These fees are recorded when earned via completion of the transaction for the client. The completion of the transaction is deemed to be the performance obligation of the transaction. The related revenue is recorded through a direct charge to the client’s account. There are no individual agreements or contracts with clients as it relates to foreign exchange fees as they are governed by client disclosure statements and the Bank’s internal policies and procedures.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of other banking fee income as described above is considered in-scope for ASC 606. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, $3.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of other banking fee income as described above is considered in-scope for ASC 606.

~~13.~~14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014 and at various other dates after May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)~~ (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 replaces existing revenue recognition standards and expands the disclosure requirements for revenue agreements with customers. ASU 2014-09 has been subsequently amended by additional ASUs, including ASU 2016-08, ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)~~ ~~and ASU 2016-12,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,~~ ~~collectively, “ASU 2014-09~~ et al.”. Under the new standard, a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

reflects the consideration which the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 et ~~al.~~al. does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments such as loans and securities. ~~Therefore,~~On January 1, 2018, the ~~Company’s net interest income will not be impacted by this new standard. The~~ Company ~~has assembled a project team to address the changes pursuant to~~adopted ASU 2014-09 et alal.. The project team has completed the scope assessment. Approximately 61% of our revenue, including all of our interest income and a portion of our noninterest income, is out of scope of the guidance. The contracts that are in scope of the guidance are primarily related to service charges and fees on deposit accounts, wealth management and trust income, wealth advisory income, investment management income, and other service charges, commissions and fees. We are currently finalizing our review of these contracts and have not identified any material changes in the timing of revenue recognition. We plan to adopt ASU 2014-09 ~~et al~~. using the modified retrospective transition method, ~~with a~~however no cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of January 1, ~~2018. Although~~2018 was required. For additional disclosure details, see Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 13: Revenue Recognition.”

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Instruments - Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Management must evaluate whether conditions and events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and then whether its plans alleviate that doubt. ASU 2014-15 was effective in 2016 and management performs the required evaluation quarterly and has concluded that there are no such conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01. This ASU requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value, net of tax, recognized in net income. As a result of implementing this standard, the Company ~~does not anticipate any material impact~~reclassified $339 thousand in unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity investments, net of ~~ASU 2014-09~~ ~~et al.~~,tax, from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Additionally, this amendment requires that entities use the ~~Company does expect additional~~exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial ~~statement disclosures and associated internal controls~~instruments for disclosure purposes. As a result of implementing this standard, the Company’s updated process includes identifying a fair value for loans using the exit price notion. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to ~~be implemented along with the adoption of this ASU.~~Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 5: Fair Value Measurements” for further details.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU update amends current lease accounting and requires all leases, other than short-term leases, to be reported on the balance sheet through the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a corresponding liability for future lease obligations. The amended guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods and will require transition utilizing a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial ~~statements.~~statements (an additional transition method has been provided for in ASU 2018-11, discussed below). Early adoption of this ASU is permitted although the Company does not plan to early adopt. The Company does not anticipate a material impact to revenue or operating expenses as a result of the adoption of

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

this ASU. The Company expects that this ASU will gross up the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the lease assets and ~~liabilities.~~liabilities and reduce regulatory capital ratios.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-09.~~2016-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based plans such as income tax consequences, classification of awards as either liabilities or equity on the balance sheet, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU has resulted in, and will continue to result in, fluctuations in the Company’s earnings due to changes in the Company’s stock price between issuance date and settlement date of employee share-based transactions. In addition, the Company anticipates that certain stock options will expire unexercised, due to ~~being out of the money,~~having no intrinsic value, and this ASU requires the previous tax benefits to be reversed. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the impact on the Company’s income tax expense related to the adoption of this ASU was a decrease of $0.3 million.~~

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). This update is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is available as of the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not plan on ~~adopting early.~~early adopting. The impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements will depend on factors at the time of adoption such as the balance and type of loans on the balance sheet, the Company’s loan loss history, and various qualitative factors.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-15,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows~~ ~~(Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-15”).~~2016-15. This update is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. This ASU iswas effective for ~~fiscal years~~the Company beginning ~~after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years.~~on January 1, 2018. Early adoption iswas permitted, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period, however the Company ~~does~~did not ~~plan to~~ early adopt. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. ~~The Company does~~This ASU did not ~~expect that this ASU will~~ have ~~a significant~~an impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

In ~~January~~March 2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-04.~~2017-07. This ~~update is~~amendment requires an employer to report the ~~result of~~service cost component in the ~~first phase of a two phase project~~same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the ~~FASB to reduce~~pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost ~~and complexity of the goodwill impairment test. The objective of Phase 1 of the project, which resulted in ASU 2017-04, is to simplify how an entity is~~are required to ~~test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2~~be presented in the income statement separately from the ~~goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures~~service cost component and outside a ~~goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value~~subtotal of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Instead, under the amendments in ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income ~~tax effects~~ from ~~any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss,~~operations, if applicable. Under the provisions of this update, an entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment, or Step 0 test, for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment testone is ~~necessary.~~presented. This ASU ~~will be~~was effective for ~~any annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in~~ fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2019, with early adoption permitted for~~2017, and interim ~~or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU as~~periods within those years. As a result of ~~January 1, 2017. The~~the adoption of this ASU, ~~could increase or decrease the amount of a goodwill impairment charge should any of~~$256 thousand and $597 thousand, respectively, have been reclassified from salaries and employee benefits expense to other expense within the Company’s ~~reporting units with goodwill fail a Step 1 test in~~consolidated statement of operations for the ~~future, as compared~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, $131 thousand and $411 thousand, respectively, are presented within other expense that would have been presented within salaries and employee benefits prior to ~~the amount~~adoption of ~~a goodwill impairment charge under the existing standards depending on the fair value of the reporting unit’s assets.~~ASU 2017-07.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities (“ASU 2017-08”). This update amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The amortization period for the premium on such securities is being shortened to the earliest call date. Under current GAAP, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The guidance requires application using a modified retrospective transition method through a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company early adopted this ASU as of July 1, 2017, which had ~~a minimal~~an immaterial impact on the consolidated financial statements.

~~BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)~~

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2017-12,~~ ~~Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities~~ ~~(“ASU 2017-12”).~~2017-12. The standard is intended to improve the transparency and understandability of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities by better aligning the entity’s financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities and to reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting by preparers. ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2018;~~2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company ~~plans~~elected to early adopt this ASU as of January 1, ~~2018. The~~2018 with a modified retrospective transition. As a result of implementing this standard, the Company ~~currently has seven interest rate swaps that are designated for hedge accounting and the adoption is not expected~~reclassified $5 thousand in unrealized losses on derivatives from accumulated other comprehensive income to ~~have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.~~retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. This ASU will provide more flexibility in the Company’s risk management activities and we believe it will enhance the Company’s ability to employ risk management strategies, while improving the transparency and understanding of those strategies for financial statement users.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update was issued to address a narrow-scope financial reporting issue that arose as a consequence of the change in the tax law. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. federal government enacted the Tax Act which, among other significant changes, lowers the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. This update requires a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the enactment of the Tax Act. ASC 740 requires that the tax effects of changes in tax rates be recognized in income tax expense/ (benefit) attributable to continuing operations in the period in which the law is enacted. As a result, the tax effect of accumulated other comprehensive income does not reflect the appropriate tax rate. The amendments in this ASU eliminate the stranded tax effects associated with the change in the federal corporate income tax rate related to the Tax Act and improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company early adopted this ASU on December 31, 2017 and reclassified $1.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases (“ASU 2018-10”), and ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements (“ASU 2018-11”). These updates clarify the guidance in ASU 2016-02 which introduced Topic 842, and add an additional transition method for leases. ASU 2018-11 allows entities to initially apply the new leases standard at the adoption date (January 1, 2019 for the Company) and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. This transition method is in addition to the initial modified retrospective transition method, which would require an entity to initially apply the new leases standard (subject to specific transition requirements and optional practical expedients) at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements (January 1, 2017 for the Company). This means that starting on January 1, 2017, lessees must recognize lease assets and liabilities for all leases even though those leases may have expired before the effective date. Lessees also must provide the new and enhanced disclosures for each period presented, including the comparative periods. ASU 2018-11 would not require the amended disclosures of Topic 842 for comparative periods. The Company will adopt these

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

provisions along with those of ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019, and has elected to use the cumulative effect adjustment transition method, as prescribed by ASU 2018-11.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). The amendments in ASU 2018-13 modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. Among other changes, this update removes the requirements to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels, and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. This update adds to required disclosures for changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is still assessing the potential disclosure impact for these amendments and whether to adopt the provisions prior to January 1, 2020.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (“ASU 2018-14”). The amendments in ASU 2018-14 remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. This update is effective on a retrospective basis for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. The Company is still assessing the potential impact for this update and how it applies to the Company’s disclosures surrounding its two non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERP”) and a long term incentive plan (“LTIP”) at one of its affiliate companies.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2018-15”). The amendments in ASU 2018-15 align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in ASU 2018-15. This update is effective on a retrospective basis for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. The Company plans to early adopt this update effective January 1, 2019.

15. Subsequent Events

BOS Transaction

On October 17, 2018, the Company announced an agreement to sell all of its ownership interest in BOS in a transaction that will result in BOS being majority-owned by members of its management team for an upfront cash payment and a non-voting, revenue share participation interest in BOS. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2018. Completion of the transaction is subject to obtaining client consents, as well as satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.

As a result of finalizing the sale agreements and obtaining approval by the Company’s Board of Directors on such date, the Company determined that the criteria for held for sale accounting treatment, which had not been met at September 30, 2018, had been met as of October 17, 2018. Therefore, the Company will classify BOS assets and liabilities as held for sale for the period from October 17, 2018 through the close of the transaction.

The Company will receive approximately $21 million of cash at closing and an eight year revenue share. The Company currently estimates that the financial impact of the transaction will result in a pre-tax gain of approximately $18 million and a related tax expense of approximately $3 million to $4 million. The net financial impact will increase Tier 1 Common Equity by approximately $33 million. The financial impact will be recorded at the time of closing.

BOS had approximately $4.7 billion of AUM as of September 30, 2018 and accounted for approximately $17.4 million of revenue in the Company’s Wealth Advisory segment, $11.9 million of operating expense, and $2.1 million of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Company’s financial results during the first nine months of 2018.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Chief Executive Officer Transition

On November 2, 2018, Clayton G. Deutsch informed the Board of Directors of the Company of his intent to retire from his positions as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and as Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of the Bank, effective November 26, 2018.

On November 5, 2018, the Company announced that Anthony DeChellis, 56, will become Chief Executive Officer, President, and member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of the Bank, effective November 26, 2018. Mr. DeChellis will become President of the Bank on December 1, 2018, following the previously announced retirement of George G. Schwartz.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our strategy, effectiveness of our investment programs, evaluations of future interest rate trends and liquidity, expectations as to growth in assets, deposits and results of operations, receipt of regulatory approval for pending acquisitions, success of acquisitions, future operations, market position, financial position, and prospects, plans and objectives of management. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because they are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control.

Forward-looking statements are based on the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, factors referenced herein under the section captioned “Risk Factors”; adverse conditions in the capital and debt markets and the impact of such conditions on the Company’s private banking, wealth management and trust, investment management, and wealth advisory activities; changes in interest rates; competitive pressures from other financial institutions; the effects of weakness in general economic conditions on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Company operates; changes in the value of securities and other assets; changes in loan default and charge-off rates; the adequacy of loan loss reserves; reductions in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and investments; operational risks including, but not limited to, cybersecurity, fraud, and natural disasters; changes in government regulation; the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired; the risk that the Company’s deferred tax assets may not be realized; risks related to the identification and implementation of acquisitions, dispositions and restructurings; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements, as well as the other risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

Executive Summary

~~Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.~~The Company offers a wide range of private banking and wealth management ~~and private banking~~ services to high net worth individuals, families, businesses and select institutions through its four reportable segments: Private Banking, Wealth Management and Trust, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory. This Executive Summary provides an overview of the most significant aspects of our operating segments and the Company’s operations in the third quarter of ~~2017.~~2018. Details of the matters addressed in this summary are provided elsewhere in this document and, in particular, in the sections immediately following.


	As of and for the three months ended September 30,											As of and for the three months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			% Change		2018			2017			$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except per share data)											(In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenues	$	96,894		$	89,883		$	7,011		8	%	$	91,955		$	96,894		$	(4,939	)	(5	)%
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(432		)	(138		)	(294		)	nm		(949		)	(432		)	(517		)	nm
Total operating expense	69,346			61,670			7,676			12	%	68,557			69,346			(789		)	(1	)%
Net income from continuing operations	19,691			19,699			(8		)	—	%	18,886			19,691			(805		)	(4	)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	1,074			1,110			(36		)	(3	)%	924			1,074			(150		)	(14	)%
Net income attributable to the Company	19,803			19,636			167			1	%	17,962			19,803			(1,841		)	(9	)%
Diluted earnings per share:
From continuing operations	$	0.21		$	0.21		$	—		—	%	$	0.20		$	0.21		$	(0.01	)	(5	)%
From discontinued operations	$	0.01		$	0.01		$	—		—	%	$	—		$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	(100	)%
Total attributable to common shareholders	$	0.22		$	0.22		$	—		—	%	$	0.20		$	0.22		$	(0.02	)	(9	)%

ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORY:
Wealth Management and Trust	$	7,703,000		$	7,334,000		$	369,000		5	%	$	8,335,000		$	7,703,000		$	632,000		8	%
Wealth Advisory	10,992,000			10,028,000			964,000			10	%	11,977,000			10,992,000			985,000			9	%
Investment Managers(1)	11,083,000			10,176,000			907,000			9	%	2,125,000			11,083,000			(8,958,000		)	(81	)%
Less: Inter-company Relationship	(11,000		)	(11,000		)	—			—	%	(7,000		)	(11,000		)	4,000			(36	)%
Total Assets Under Management and Advisory	$	29,767,000		$	27,527,000		$	2,240,000		8	%
Total Assets Under Management and Advisory (“AUM”) (1)												$	22,430,000		$	29,767,000		$	(7,337,000	)	(25	)%

_____________________

nm -= not meaningful


(1)	Includes the AUM at Anchor of $9.2 billion at September 30, 2017.

Net income attributable to the Company was ~~$19.8~~$18.0 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$19.6~~$19.8 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The Company recognized diluted earnings per share of $0.20 and $0.22 for ~~each of~~ the ~~three month~~three-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, ~~and 2016.~~respectively.

Key items that affected the Company’s results in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2018 compared to the same period of ~~2016~~2017 include:

▪

Net income attributable to the Company decreased 9%, or $1.8 million, to $18.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $19.8 million for the same period of 2017. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in total revenues of $4.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense of $2.8 million and a decrease in total operating expenses of $0.8 million. Within operating expenses, a restructuring expense charge of $5.8 million was taken in the third quarter of 2018.

▪

Net interest income increased ~~14%,~~5% to ~~$56.6~~$59.6 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$49.9~~$56.6 million for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. The increase ~~for the three months is due to~~was primarily driven by higher ~~volume~~yields and ~~yields~~volumes on ~~loans,~~interest-earning assets, and interest recoveries, partially offset by higher ~~volumes and average~~ rates paid on ~~interest-bearing~~ deposits and ~~higher volume and average rates paid on the Company’s~~ borrowings. The net interest margin (“NIM”) on a fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”) basis was ~~3.02%~~2.93% for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, an increase~~2018, a decrease of ~~fourteen~~9 basis points compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017 primarily driven by the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate and higher funding costs.

▪

Total fees and other income ~~increased 1%~~decreased 20%, or $8.0 million, to ~~$40.3~~$32.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$40.0~~$40.3 million for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. This ~~increase~~decrease was primarily driven by a ~~7% increase in wealth management and trust fees, a 5% increase~~$8.0 million decrease in investment management fees ~~and~~due to the divestiture of Anchor, partially offset by a 4%$0.7 million increase in wealth advisory fees ~~partially offset by decreases in swap fee income and market value adjustments on derivatives.~~due to higher AUM. Total fees and other income represents ~~42%~~35% of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~45%~~42% of total revenue for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017.

▪

Total operating expenses ~~increased 12%~~decreased 1%, or $0.8 million, to ~~$69.3~~$68.6 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$61.7~~$69.3 million for the same period of ~~2016. Increases~~2017. The decrease was primarily driven by the divestiture of Anchor, which contributed to the $6.0 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits ~~occupancy and equipment, professional fees, and marketing and business development expenses were~~expense, partially offset by ~~decreases in amortization of intangibles and contract services and data processing expenses.~~the $5.8 million restructuring expense.

The Company’s Private Banking segment reported net income attributable to the Company of ~~$16.3~~$15.7 million in the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, compared to net income attributable to the Company of ~~$17.4~~$16.3 million for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million, or 6%4%, decrease was ~~a result~~primarily driven by an increase of ~~the~~$6.2 million in operating expenses partially offset by an increase of $2.9 million in total revenues. The increase in operating expenses ~~particularly salaries~~was driven by $5.2 million in restructuring expense and ~~employee benefits and occupancy and equipment expenses, and a decrease~~an increase of $1.2 million in ~~banking fee income related to swap fees, partially offset~~information systems expense. The increase in total revenues was primarily driven by ~~the~~an increase of $3.3 million in net interest income due to interest recoveries and higher asset yields, partially offset by higher funding costs. The decrease in income taxes was primarily driven by lower pre-tax income and the ~~increase~~reduction in the ~~credit to the provision for loan losses.~~federal corporate tax rate.

The Company’s Wealth Management and Trust segment reported net income attributable to the Company of ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million in the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, compared to a net ~~loss~~income attributable to the Company of ~~$0.8~~$0.1 million for the same period of ~~2016. During 2015 and 2016, employee turnover and the related loss~~2017. The $0.4 million increase was primarily driven by a decrease in total operating expenses of clients led to a negative impact on revenues and AUM. AUM dropped to $7.1 billion at the end of Q1 2016, from a high of $9.3 billion in AUM at the beginning of 2015. During 2016 and 2017, the segment took several actions to refine the cost structure of the business and stabilize the AUM base. The 2017 net income is attributed to continued refinement of the business’ cost structure combined with an increase in revenue levels year-over-year. Wealth management and trust fee income increased $0.8 million ~~or 7%, compared~~due to lower salaries and employee benefits and professional services expense, partially offset by restructuring expense of $0.6 million. During the same period, ~~in 2016, while operating expenses~~total revenues revenues decreased ~~$0.6~~$0.1 million ~~or 5%, as compared~~due to the ~~same period in 2016. Fee-based revenue in~~difference between the ~~Wealth Management~~effective fee rate on closed accounts and ~~Trust segment is determined based~~the effective fee rate on ~~beginning-of-quarter, end-of-month, or, for a small number of clients, end-of-quarter AUM data, depending on the custodian.~~new accounts and existing client contributions. Wealth Management and Trust AUM increased ~~$0.4~~$0.6 billion, or 5%8%, to $8.3 billion at September 30, 2018 from $7.7 billion at September 30, ~~2017 from $7.3 billion at September 30, 2016.~~2017. The increase in AUM is due to net inflows of $0.3 billion and positive market action of ~~$0.3 billion and net inflows of $0.1~~$0.2 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

On April 13, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Anchor. Anchor’s results through the closing date remain consolidated in the Company’s results through April 13, 2018 and prior periods. Results for the remaining period of 2018 after the close of the transaction in April will not include Anchor operations.

The Company’s Investment Management segment reported net income attributable to the Company of ~~$1.4~~$0.6 million in the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, compared to net income attributable to the Company of ~~$1.3~~$1.4 million for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~9% increase~~$0.8 million, or 59%, decrease was ~~due~~ primarily driven by the impact of the divestiture of Anchor which reduced all revenue and expense categories as compared to ~~a 5% increase in investment management fee income, partially offset by a 5% increase in operating expenses, primarily in legal fees and salaries and employee benefits. Most fee-based revenue in~~ the ~~investment management segment is determined based on beginning-of-period AUM data.~~same period of 2017. Investment Management AUM ~~increased $0.9~~decreased $9.0 billion ~~or 9%,~~ to $2.1 billion at September 30, 2018 from $11.1 billion at September 30, 2017, ~~from $10.2 billion at September 30, 2016,~~ primarily ~~due to~~driven by the impact of the divestiture of Anchor in the second quarter of 2018, partially offset by positive market action of ~~$1.3~~$0.2 billion ~~partially offset by~~and positive net ~~outflows~~flows of ~~$0.4~~$0.1 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

The Company’s Wealth Advisory segment reported net income attributable to the Company of ~~$2.0~~$2.6 million in the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, compared to net income attributable to the Company of ~~$1.8~~$2.0 million for the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. The 9%$0.7 million, or 33%, increase was ~~due to~~primarily driven by a 4%$0.7 million increase in wealth advisory fee income due to higher levels of AUM, partially offset by a 2%$0.3 million increase in operating ~~expenses. The operating expense increase was primarily~~expenses due to ~~increased~~higher salaries and ~~employee~~ benefits ~~expense, and occupancy and equipment expense, partially offset by decreased intangible amortization~~ expense. Fee-based revenue in the Wealth Advisory segment is determined based on either a fixed fee or end-of-quarter AUM balances. Wealth Advisory AUM increased $1.0 billion, or ~~10%~~9%, to $12.0 billion at September 30, 2018 from $11.0 billion at September 30, 2017, ~~from $10.0 billion at September 30, 2016,~~ primarily due to positive market action of $0.9 billion and net inflows of $0.1 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies reflect significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. The Company believes that its most critical accounting policies upon which its financial condition depends, and which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments are the allowance for loan ~~and lease~~ losses, the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets and analysis for impairment, and tax estimates. These policies are discussed in Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations –- Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017. There have been no changes to these policies through the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 versus September 30, ~~2016~~2017

Net Income. The Company recorded net income from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~$19.7~~$18.9 million and ~~$58.2~~$48.3 million, respectively, compared to $19.7 million and ~~$52.7~~$58.2 million for the same respective periods in ~~2016.~~2017. Net income attributable to the Company, which includes income from both continuing and discontinued operations, for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was $18.0 million and $47.1 million, respectively, compared to $19.8 million and $58.9 ~~million, respectively, compared to $19.6 million and $54.1~~ million for the same respective periods in ~~2016.~~2017.

The Company recorded net income from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 of zero and $1.7 million, respectively, compared to $1.2 million and $3.9 million for the same respective periods in 2017. The Company received the final payment related to a revenue sharing agreement with Westfield Capital Management Company, LLC (“Westfield”) in the first quarter of 2018. The Company will not receive additional income from Westfield now that the final payment has been received.

The Company recognized diluted EPS attributable to common shareholders, which includes both continuing and discontinued operations, for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~$0.22~~$0.20 per share and ~~$0.66~~$0.50 per share, respectively, compared to $0.22 per share and ~~$0.62~~$0.66 per share ~~respectively,~~ for the same respective periods in ~~2016.~~

2017. Net income from continuing operations in both ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 was partially offset by charges that reduce income available to common shareholders. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2: Earnings Per Share” for further detail on these charges to income available to common shareholders.

The following discussions are based on the Company’s continuing operations, unless otherwise stated.

The following table presents selected financial highlights:


	Three months ended September 30,						% Change			Nine months ended September 30,								% Change		Three months ended September 30,								$ Change			% Change			Nine months ended September 30,							$ Change			% Change
	2017			2016					2017				2016				2018				2017						2018				% Change		2017								$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)																			(In thousands)
Net interest income	$	56,627		$	49,871		% Change	14	%		$	167,414			$	148,919		% Change			12	%	$	59,641			$	$ Change		56,627			3,014			5	%		$	174,569		$	167,414		$	7,155	4	%
Fees and other income	40,267			40,012			1	%		114,791				114,829				—	%	32,314				40,267				(7,953	)		(20	)%		104,152				114,791			(10,639		)	(9	)%
Total revenue	96,894			89,883			8	%		282,205				263,748				7	%	91,955				96,894				(4,939	)		(5	)%		278,721				282,205			(3,484		)	(1	)%
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	(432		)	(138		)	nm			(6,727		)		(5,806		)		16	%	(949		)		(432		)		(517	)		nm			(2,291		)		(6,727		)	4,436			(66	)%
Operating expense	69,346			61,670			12	%		205,947				193,110				7	%	68,557				69,346				(789	)		(1	)%		203,798				205,947			(2,149		)	(1	)%
Income tax expense	8,289			8,652			(4	)%		24,805				23,716				5	%	5,461				8,289				(2,828	)		(34	)%		28,886				24,805			4,081			16	%
Net income from continuing operations	19,691			19,699			—	%		58,180				52,728				10	%	18,886				19,691				(805	)		(4	)%		48,328				58,180			(9,852		)	(17	)%
Net income from discontinued operations	1,186			1,047			13	%		3,881				4,357				(11	)%
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations																				—				1,186				(1,186	)		(100	)%		1,696				3,881			(2,185		)	(56	)%
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	1,074			1,110			(3	)%		3,190				3,010				6	%	924				1,074				(150	)		(14	)%		2,942				3,190			(248		)	(8	)%
Net income attributable to the Company	$	19,803		$	19,636		1	%		$	58,871			$	54,075			9	%	$	17,962			$	19,803			(1,841	)		(9	)%		$	47,082			$	58,871		$	(11,789	)	(20	)%

_____________________

nm = not meaningful

Net interest income. Net interest income represents the difference between interest earned, primarily on loans and investments, and interest paid on funding sources, primarily deposits and borrowings. Interest rate spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities. ~~Net Interest Margin (“NIM”)~~NIM is ~~calculated by taking annualized~~the amount of net interest income, ~~for the period,~~ on a ~~fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”)~~FTE basis, expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The average rate earned on ~~earning~~interest-earning assets is the amount of annualized taxable equivalent interest income expressed as a percentage of average ~~earning~~interest-earning assets. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities is equal to annualized interest

expense as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities. When credit quality declines and loans are placed on nonaccrual status, NIM can decrease because the same assets are earning less income. Loans graded as substandard but still accruing interest income totaled ~~$53.7~~$55.4 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and could be placed on nonaccrual status if their credit quality declines further.

Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$56.6~~$59.6 million, an increase of ~~$6.8~~$3.0 million, or ~~14%~~5%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, net interest income was ~~$167.4~~$174.6 million, an increase of ~~$18.5~~$7.2 million, or ~~12%~~4%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase for the three and nine months is ~~due to higher volume and yields on loans and~~primarily driven by higher yields and volumes on ~~cash~~interest-earning assets, and ~~investments,~~interest recoveries, partially offset by higher ~~volume and average~~ rates paid on ~~the Company’s borrowings and interest-bearing~~ deposits and ~~higher~~borrowings. The increases in yields and rates paid ~~on the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. The increase for the nine months is~~are due to higher volume and yields on loans and cash and investments, partially offset by higher volume and average rates paid on and interest-bearing deposits and the Company’s FHLB and other borrowings, and higher average rates paid on the Company’s junior subordinated debentures.increases in interest rate benchmarks. The NIM was ~~3.02%~~2.93% for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, an increase~~2018, a decrease of ~~fourteen~~9 basis points compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the NIM was ~~3.01%~~2.92%, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~nine~~9 basis points compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Due to the lower federal tax rate in 2018, the FTE adjustment has a lower impact on the interest gross-up for NIM purposes.

The following tables present the composition of the Company’s NIM on a FTE basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016;~~2017; however, the discussion following these tables reflects non-FTE data.

Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Rate
As of and for the three months ended September 30,
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET: 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
AVERAGE ASSETS (In thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Cash and Investments: (1)
Taxable investment securities $ 353,374
$ 372,852
$ 1,569
$ 1,537
1.77 % 1.65 %
Non-taxable investment securities (2) 295,727
271,864
2,559
2,221
3.46 % 3.27 %
Mortgage-backed securities 631,052
629,748
3,267
3,079
2.07 % 1.96 %
Federal funds sold and other 146,285
152,892
916
469
2.47 % 1.20 %
Total Cash and Investments 1,426,438
1,427,356
8,311
7,306
2.33 % 2.05 %
Loans (3):
Commercial and Industrial (2) 994,388
1,065,787
10,001
10,626
3.94 % 3.90 %
Commercial Real Estate (2) 2,381,583
1,976,327
25,579
19,860
4.20 % 3.93 %
Construction and Land 113,562
117,183
1,415
1,263
4.88 % 4.22 %
Residential 2,567,044
2,300,392
20,423
17,812
3.18 % 3.10 %
Home Equity 106,744
122,505
1,128
1,105
4.19 % 3.59 %
Other Consumer 187,184
182,315
1,554
1,154
3.29 % 2.52 %
Total Loans 6,350,505
5,764,509
60,100
51,820
3.73 % 3.55 %
Total Earning Assets 7,776,943
7,191,865
68,411
59,126
3.48 % 3.25 %
Less: Allowance for Loan Losses 75,166
76,424

Cash and due From Banks (Non-interest Bearing) 42,031
39,301

Other Assets 455,820
445,517

TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS $ 8,199,628
$ 7,600,259

AVERAGE LIABILITIES, RNCI, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-Bearing Deposits (4):
NOW $ 630,282
$ 551,085
$ 189
$ 120
0.12 % 0.09 %
Savings 71,900
76,999
16
25
0.09 % 0.13 %
Money Market 3,065,059
2,922,687
3,436
2,877
0.44 % 0.39 %
Certificates of Deposit 671,992
560,546
1,715
1,141
1.01 % 0.81 %
Total Interest Bearing Deposits 4,439,233
4,111,317
5,356
4,163
0.48 % 0.40 %
Junior Subordinated Debentures 106,363
106,363
761
591
2.80 % 2.17 %
FHLB Borrowings and Other Borrowings 736,035
624,528
2,768
1,978
1.47 % 1.24 %
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities 5,281,631
4,842,208
8,885
6,732
0.66 % 0.55 %
Non-interest Bearing Demand Deposits (4) 1,966,479
1,824,548

Payables and Other Liabilities 121,288
135,901

Total Average Liabilities 7,369,398
6,802,657

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 21,634
19,504

Average Shareholders’ Equity 808,596
778,098

TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES, RNCI, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 8,199,628
$ 7,600,259

Net Interest Income - on a FTE Basis $ 59,526
$ 52,394

FTE Adjustment (2) 2,899
2,523

Net Interest Income (GAAP Basis) $ 56,627
$ 49,871

Interest Rate Spread 2.82 % 2.70 %
Net Interest Margin 3.02 % 2.88 %



	Average Balance				Interest Income/Expense				Average Yield/Rate
	As of and for the three months ended September 30,
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET:	2018		2017		2018		2017		2018		2017
AVERAGE ASSETS	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and investments: (1)
Taxable investment securities	$	324,583	$	353,374	$	1,510	$	1,569	1.86	%	1.77	%
Non-taxable investment securities (2)	297,710		295,727		2,256		2,559		3.03	%	3.46	%
Mortgage-backed securities	552,820		631,052		2,941		3,267		2.13	%	2.07	%
Short-term investments and other	204,814		146,285		1,617		916		3.11	%	2.47	%
Total cash and investments	1,379,927		1,426,438		8,324		8,311		2.41	%	2.33	%
Loans: (3)
Commercial and industrial (2)	998,817		994,388		9,940		10,001		3.89	%	3.94	%
Commercial real estate (2)	2,475,143		2,381,583		29,547		25,579		4.67	%	4.20	%
Construction and land (2)	179,248		113,562		2,196		1,415		4.80	%	4.88	%
Residential	2,836,593		2,567,044		23,907		20,423		3.37	%	3.18	%
Home equity	94,050		106,744		1,089		1,128		4.59	%	4.19	%
Other consumer	163,224		187,184		1,689		1,554		4.11	%	3.29	%
Total loans	6,747,075		6,350,505		68,368		60,100		4.00	%	3.73	%
Total earning assets	8,127,002		7,776,943		76,692		68,411		3.73	%	3.48	%
LESS: Allowance for loan losses	73,861		75,166
Cash and due from banks (non-interest bearing)	46,056		42,031
Other assets	392,757		455,820
TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS	$	8,491,954	$	8,199,628
AVERAGE LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings and NOW	$	693,419	$	702,182	$	301	$	205	0.17	%	0.12	%
Money market	3,244,628		3,065,059		8,110		3,436		0.99	%	0.44	%
Certificates of deposit	730,117		671,992		3,076		1,715		1.67	%	1.01	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	4,668,164		4,439,233		11,487		5,356		0.98	%	0.48	%
Junior subordinated debentures	106,363		106,363		1,028		761		3.78	%	2.80	%
FHLB borrowings and other	768,015		736,035		3,945		2,768		2.01	%	1.47	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	5,542,542		5,281,631		16,460		8,885		1.17	%	0.66	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	2,063,642		1,966,479
Payables and other liabilities	135,508		121,288
Total average liabilities	7,741,692		7,369,398
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	13,074		21,634
Average shareholders’ equity	737,188		808,596
TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	8,491,954	$	8,199,628
Net interest income - on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE)					$	60,232	$	59,526
LESS: FTE adjustment (2)					591		2,899
Net interest income (GAAP basis)					$	59,641	$	56,627
Interest rate spread									2.56	%	2.82	%
Net interest margin									2.93	%	3.02	%

Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Rate
As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET: 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
AVERAGE ASSETS (In thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Cash and Investments: (1)
Taxable investment securities $ 369,929
$ 373,273
$ 4,831
$ 4,638
1.74 % 1.66 %
Non-taxable investment securities (2) 295,195
265,280
7,576
6,512
3.42 % 3.27 %
Mortgage-backed securities 652,159
594,461
10,266
9,126
2.10 % 2.05 %
Federal funds sold and other 169,114
160,114
2,347
1,381
1.55 % 1.14 %
Total Cash and Investments 1,486,397
1,393,128
25,020
21,657
2.21 % 2.07 %
Loans (3):
Commercial and Industrial (2) 988,449
1,072,051
29,077
32,358
3.88 % 3.97 %
Commercial Real Estate (2) 2,354,996
1,915,839
75,556
59,216
4.23 % 4.06 %
Construction and Land 115,629
147,548
4,036
4,367
4.60 % 3.89 %
Residential 2,494,151
2,262,262
58,988
52,555
3.15 % 3.10 %
Home Equity 111,423
121,849
3,302
3,260
3.96 % 3.57 %
Other Consumer 191,550
172,578
4,500
3,193
3.14 % 2.47 %
Total Loans 6,256,198
5,692,127
175,459
154,949
3.71 % 3.60 %
Total Earning Assets 7,742,595
7,085,255
200,479
176,606
3.43 % 3.30 %
Less: Allowance for Loan Losses 77,957
78,008

Cash and due From Banks (Non-interest Bearing) 42,006
39,869

Other Assets 436,373
432,005

TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS $ 8,143,017
$ 7,479,121

AVERAGE LIABILITIES, RNCI, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-Bearing Deposits (4):
NOW $ 616,054
$ 549,429
$ 472
$ 311
0.10 % 0.08 %
Savings 72,831
75,958
49
71
0.09 % 0.13 %
Money Market 3,149,545
2,958,051
9,801
8,615
0.42 % 0.39 %
Certificates of Deposit 642,820
566,022
4,514
3,423
0.94 % 0.81 %
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits 4,481,250
4,149,460
14,836
12,420
0.44 % 0.40 %
Junior Subordinated Debentures 106,363
106,363
2,148
1,753
2.66 % 2.17 %
FHLB Borrowings and Other Borrowings 722,087
623,030
7,439
6,138
1.36 % 1.29 %
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities 5,309,700
4,878,853
24,423
20,311
0.61 % 0.55 %
Non-interest Bearing Demand Deposits (4) 1,903,709
1,691,872

Payables and Other Liabilities 115,622
121,601

Total Average Liabilities 7,329,031
6,692,326

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 21,341
20,225

Average Shareholders’ Equity 792,645
766,570

TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES, RNCI, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 8,143,017
$ 7,479,121

Net Interest Income - on a FTE Basis $ 176,056
$ 156,295

FTE Adjustment (2) 8,642
7,376

Net Interest Income (GAAP Basis) $ 167,414
$ 148,919

Interest Rate Spread 2.82 % 2.75 %
Net Interest Margin 3.01 % 2.92 %



	Average Balance					Interest Income/Expense				Average Yield/Rate
	As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET:	2018		2017			2018		2017		2018		2017
AVERAGE ASSETS	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and investments: (1)
Taxable investment securities	$	328,054	$	369,929		$	4,521	$	4,831	1.84	%	1.74	%
Non-taxable investment securities (2)	297,509		295,195			6,663		7,576		2.99	%	3.42	%
Mortgage-backed securities	570,578		652,159			9,168		10,266		2.14	%	2.10	%
Short-term investments and other	174,736		169,114			3,831		2,347		2.91	%	1.55	%
Total cash and investments	1,370,877		1,486,397			24,183		25,020		2.35	%	2.21	%
Loans: (3)
Commercial and industrial (2)	969,063		988,449			28,135		29,077		3.83	%	3.88	%
Commercial real estate (2)	2,464,788		2,354,996			83,438		75,556		4.46	%	4.23	%
Construction and land (2)	171,825		115,629			6,201		4,036		4.76	%	4.60	%
Residential	2,771,875		2,494,151			68,263		58,988		3.28	%	3.15	%
Home equity	95,217		111,423			3,172		3,302		4.45	%	3.96	%
Other consumer	176,086		191,550			5,080		4,500		3.86	%	3.14	%
Total loans	6,648,854		6,256,198			194,289		175,459		3.87	%	3.71	%
Total earning assets	8,019,731		7,742,595			218,472		200,479		3.61	%	3.43	%
LESS: Allowance for loan losses	73,894		77,957
Cash and due from banks (non-interest bearing)	47,859		42,006
Other assets	404,375		436,373
TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS	$	8,398,071	$	8,143,017	��
AVERAGE LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings and NOW	$	709,751	$	688,885		$	820	$	521	0.15	%	0.10	%
Money market	3,139,107		3,149,545			17,967		9,801		0.77	%	0.42	%
Certificates of deposit	691,670		642,820			7,589		4,514		1.47	%	0.94	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	4,540,528		4,481,250			26,376		14,836		0.78	%	0.44	%
Junior subordinated debentures	106,363		106,363			2,882		2,148		3.62	%	2.66	%
FHLB borrowings and other	889,178		722,087			12,185		7,439		1.81	%	1.36	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	5,536,069		5,309,700			41,443		24,423		1.00	%	0.61	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	1,948,573		1,903,709
Payables and other liabilities	130,410		115,622
Total average liabilities	7,615,052		7,329,031
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	16,294		21,341
Average shareholders’ equity	766,725		792,645
TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	8,398,071	$	8,143,017
Net interest income - on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE)						$	177,029	$	176,056
LESS: FTE adjustment (2)						2,460		8,642
Net interest income (GAAP basis)						$	174,569	$	167,414
Interest rate spread										2.61	%	2.82	%
Net interest margin										2.92	%	3.01	%

____________________


(1)	Investments classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity are shown in the average balance sheet at amortized cost.


(2)	Interest income on non-taxable investments and loans is presented on a FTE basis using statutory rates. The discussion following these tables reflects non-FTE data.


(3)	Includes loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans.


~~(4)~~	~~Includes deposits held for sale, if any.~~

Interest and dividend income. Total interest and dividend income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$65.5~~$76.1 million, an increase of ~~$8.9~~$10.6 million, or 16%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Interest and dividend income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$191.8~~$216.0 million, an increase of ~~$22.6~~$24.2 million, or 13%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase for the three and nine months was primarily ~~due to higher volume and yields on loans and~~driven by higher yields and volumes on ~~cash~~interest-earning assets, and ~~investments as well as, for the nine month period,~~interest recoveries, partially offset by higher ~~volume of cash~~rates paid on deposits and ~~investments.~~borrowings

The Bank generally has interest income that is either ~~recovered~~collected or reversed related to nonaccrual loans each quarter. Based on the net amount ~~recovered~~collected or reversed, the impact on interest income and related yields can be either positive or negative. In addition, the Bank collects prepayment penalties on certain commercial loans that pay off prior to maturity which could also impact interest income and related yields positively. The amount and timing of prepayment penalties varies from quarter to quarter.

Interest income on commercial and industrial loans, on a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$8.7~~$9.9 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.1~~$1.1 million, or 1%13% compared to the same period in 2017. This increase was a result of a 38 basis point increase in the average yield on a non-FTE basis and no change in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, commercial and industrial interest income was $27.6 million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 9%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a ~~7% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by an 18~~38 basis point increase in the average ~~yield. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, commercial and industrial interest income was $25.3 million,~~yield on a ~~decrease of $2.0 million, or 7%, compared to the same period in 2016, as~~non-FTE basis, partially offset by a ~~result of an 8%~~2% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a three basis point increase in the average yield. The decreases in the average balances for the three and nine month periods are related to the reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2016 of tax-exempt multifamily loans into commercial real estate loans. The decreases in average balances for the three and nine month periods are also due to a number of factors including seasonal fluctuations of the commercial loan portfolio at the Bank.balance. The increase in the average yield for the three and nine month periods is the result of ~~market conditions and~~increases in interest rates, specifically increases to the ~~fluctuations in the indicies~~interest rate benchmarks to which the variable rate loans are tied. The decrease in the average balance for the nine month period is related to a small number of large paydowns earlier in 2018 and increased competition in all markets in which the Bank operates.

Interest income on commercial real estate loans, on a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$24.8~~$29.5 million, an increase of ~~$5.0~~$4.7 million, or ~~25%~~19%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a ~~21% increase in the average balance and a 15~~57 basis point increase in the average ~~yield.~~yield on a non-FTE basis and a 4% increase in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, commercial real estate interest income was ~~$73.4~~$83.0 million, an increase of ~~$14.2~~$9.6 million, or ~~24%~~13%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a ~~23% increase in the average balance and a five~~33 basis point increase in the average ~~yield.~~yield on a non-FTE basis and a 5% increase in the average balance. The increase in the average yield for the three and nine month periods is primarily driven by increases in interest rates, specifically increases to the interest rate benchmarks to which the variable rate loans are tied, partially offset by increased competition in all regions in which the Bank operates. The increase in the average balances for the three and nine month periods ~~are~~is related to increased demand, particularly in New England and the reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2016 of certain tax-exempt multifamily loans into commercial real estate loans. The increases in average balances for the three and nine month periods are also related to the organic growth of the commercial real estate loan portfolio at the Bank. The changes in the average yields for the three and nine month periods are the result of market conditions as well as fluctuations in the indicies to which the variable rate loans are tied.San Francisco Bay Area.

Interest income on construction and land loans, on a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$1.4~~$2.2 million, an increase of ~~$0.2~~$0.8 million, or ~~12%~~55%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a ~~66 basis point~~58% increase in the average yield, partially offset by a 3% decrease in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, construction and land interest income was $4.0 million, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 8%, compared to the same period in 2016, as a result of a 22% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a 7115 basis point decrease in the average yield on a non-FTE basis. The overall yields on construction and land loans fluctuate due to the short-term nature of the loans and the related impact of draws and payoffs. Due to the relatively low balances in construction and land loans, a large draw or pay down can have a significant change in the overall yield depending on the interest rate of the particular loans that caused the balance changes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, construction and land interest income was $6.1 million, an increase of $2.1 million, or 52%, compared to the same period in 2017, as a result of a 49% increase in the average balance and an 11 basis point increase in the average ~~yield.~~yield on a non-FTE basis. The ~~decreases~~increase in the average ~~balances~~balance for the three and nine month periods ~~are related to customer demand.~~is driven primarily by increased demand and growth in all regions in which the Bank operates. The ~~increases~~increase in the average ~~yields~~yield for the ~~three and~~ nine month ~~periods are~~period is primarily driven by increases to the ~~result of market conditions as well as fluctuations in the indicies~~interest rate benchmarks to which the variable rate loans are tied.

Interest income on residential mortgage loans for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$20.4~~$23.9 million, an increase of ~~$2.6~~$3.5 million, or ~~15%~~17%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of ~~a 12%~~an 11% increase in the average balance and ~~an eight~~a 19 basis point increase in the average yield. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, residential mortgage interest income was ~~$59.0~~$68.3 million, an increase of ~~$6.4~~$9.3 million, or ~~12%~~16%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of ~~a 10%~~an 11% increase in the average balance and a ~~five~~13 basis point increase in the average yield. The increase in the average ~~balances~~balance for the three and nine month periods is related to the organic growth of the residential loan portfolio at the ~~Bank.~~Bank, particularly in the Southern California and San Francisco Bay Area markets. The ~~increases~~increase in the average ~~yields~~yield for the three and nine month periods ~~are the result of market conditions~~is related to higher yields on residential mortgage originations and adjustable rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans repricing at higher rates due to ~~higher rates.~~increases to the interest rate benchmarks to which the loans are tied.

Interest income on home equity loans for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was $1.1 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of 2%3% compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a 6012% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a 40 basis point increase in the average yield. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, home equity interest income was $3.2 million, a decrease of 4% compared to the same period in 2017, as a result of a 15% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a 49 basis point increase in the average yield. The decrease in the average balance for the three and nine month periods is primarily driven by reduced demand as a result of the recent increases in benchmark interest rates. The increase in the average yield for the three and nine month periods is also the result of increases in benchmark interest rates.

Interest income on other consumer loans for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was $1.7 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 9%, compared to the same period in 2017, as a result of an 82 basis point increase in the average yield, partially offset by a 13% decrease in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, home equity~~2018, other consumer interest income was ~~$3.3~~$5.1 million, ~~a slight~~an increase of 1%$0.6 million, or 13%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a 3972 basis point increase in the average yield, partially offset by ~~a 9%~~an 8% decrease in the average balance. ~~The decrease in the average balance for the three and nine month periods is related to the timing of customer demand.~~ The increase in the average yield for the three and nine month periods is the result of increases in interest rate benchmarks. The decrease in the ~~Prime rate.~~average balance for the three and nine month periods is primarily driven by reduced demand also resulting from the recent increases in benchmark interest rates.

~~Interest~~Investment income, on ~~other consumer loans~~a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$1.6~~$7.8 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or ~~35%~~6%, ~~compared to~~from the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a 7719 basis point increase in the average yield ~~and~~on a non-FTE basis, partially offset by a 3% ~~increase~~decrease in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, other consumer interest~~2018, investment income was ~~$4.5~~$22.8 million, an increase of ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million, or ~~41%~~2%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of ~~an 11% increase in the average balance and~~ a 6724 basis point increase in the average ~~yield.~~yield on a non-FTE basis, partially offset by a 8% decrease in the average balance. The increase in the average yield for the three and nine month periods is primarily ~~the result~~due to a mix of ~~increases in the Prime rate.~~more Federal Reserve deposits and FHLB stock paying higher dividend and interest rates and higher coupon rates on fixed rate investment securities as benchmark interest rates rises. The ~~increase~~decrease in the average balance for the three and nine month periods is primarily due to ~~client demand.~~

~~Investment income, on a non-FTE basis, for~~ the ~~three months ended September 30, 2017 was $7.4 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 14%, compared~~proceeds from maturing investment securities being utilized to the same period in 2016, as a result of a 24 basis point increase in the average yield with a flat average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, investment income was $22.4 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 15%, comparedpay down borrowings and to the same period in 2016, as a result of a 7% increase in the average balance and a 12 basis point increase in the average yield. The increases in the average yields for the three and nine month periods are partially due to the increases in short-term interest rates. The increase in the average balance for the nine month period is primarily due to timing and volume of deposit balances as compared to the level of loans outstanding. Investment decisions are made based on anticipated liquidity,support loan ~~demand, and asset-liability management considerations.~~growth.

Interest expense. Total interest expense for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$8.9~~$16.5 million, an increase of ~~$2.2~~$7.6 million, or ~~32%~~85%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total interest expense was ~~$24.4~~$41.4 million, an increase of ~~$4.1~~$17.0 million, or ~~20%~~70%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase for the three and nine months was primarily driven by interest paid on interest-bearing deposits and interest-bearing liabilities, as a result of a market-wide increase in interest rates over the last twelve months and, for the three month period, increases in the volume of interest-bearing deposits.

Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$5.4~~$11.5 million, an increase of ~~$1.2~~$6.1 million ~~or 29%,~~ compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of ~~an eight~~a 50 basis point increase in the average rate paid and ~~an 8%~~a 5% increase in the average balance. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest expense on interest-bearing deposits was ~~$14.8~~$26.4 million, an increase of ~~$2.4~~$11.5 million, or ~~19%~~78%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of ~~an 8% increase in the average balance and~~ a ~~four~~34 basis point increase in the average rate ~~paid.~~paid and a 1% increase in the average balance. The increase for the three and nine month periods in the average rate paid on deposits is driven primarily by increases in the rates paid for certificates of deposit and money market demand accounts as benchmark interest rates have increased. The increase for the three and nine month periods in the average balance for interest-bearing deposits was primarily driven by an increased focus on driving deposit growth for all regions and businesses in which the Bank operates in order to fund loan growth.

Interest paid on non-deposit interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$3.5~~$5.0 million, an increase of ~~$1.0~~$1.4 million, or ~~37%~~41%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a 6354 basis point increase in the average rate paid on FHLB borrowings and other borrowings, a 234% increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings and other borrowings, and a 98 basis point increase in the average rate paid on junior subordinated ~~debentures, and an 18% increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings and other borrowings.~~debentures. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest paid on ~~borrowings~~non-deposit interest-bearing liabilities was ~~$9.6~~$15.1 million, an increase of ~~$1.7~~$5.5 million, or ~~21%~~57%, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of a ~~16% increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings and other borrowings, a seven~~45 basis point increase in the average rate paid on FHLB borrowings and other borrowings, a 23% increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings and other borrowings and a 4996 basis point increase in the average rate paid on junior subordinated debentures. The increases for the three and nine month periods in the average rate paid on ~~borrowings~~non-deposit interest-bearing liabilities is ~~due to~~primarily driven by the increases in benchmark interest rates to which the ~~mix~~instruments are tied. The increase for the three and ~~terms of~~nine month periods average balance for non-deposit interest-bearing deposits was primarily driven by increased FHLB borrowings ~~and~~used to fund additional loan growth due to lower than expected increases in deposit volumes over the ~~impact of derivatives.~~same period.

Provision/ (credit) for loan losses. The Company recorded a credit to the provision for loan losses of ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to a credit to the provision for loan losses of ~~$0.1~~$0.4 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the ~~Company recorded a~~ credit ~~to the provision~~ for loan losses ~~of $6.7~~was $2.3 million, compared to a

credit of ~~$5.8~~$6.7 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~credits to~~credit in the ~~provision for~~third quarter of 2018 was primarily driven by loan ~~losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were the result of net~~ recoveries and ~~improved loss factors,~~the mix in the loan portfolio, partially offset by an increase in criticized ~~loans~~ and ~~loan growth.~~classified loans.

The provision/ (credit) for loan losses is determined as a result of the required level of the allowance for loan losses, estimated by management, which reflects the inherent risk of loss in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet dates. The Company incorporates both quantitative and qualitative loss factors to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Quantitative loss factors are based on historical net charge-offs by loan portfolio. Qualitative factors are estimated by management and include trends in problem loans, economic and business conditions, strength of management, real estate collateral values, and underwriting standards. For further details, see “Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality” below.

Fees and other ~~income.~~income



	Three months ended September 30,				$ Change			% Change		Nine months ended September 30,				$ Change			% Change
	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change		2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Investment management fees	$	3,245	$	11,274	$	(8,029	)	(71	)%	$	18,897	$	33,194	$	(14,297	)	(43	)%
Wealth advisory fees	13,995		13,279		716			5	%	41,200		39,063		2,137			5	%
Wealth management and trust fees	11,510		11,619		(109		)	(1	)%	34,830		33,606		1,224			4	%
Other banking fee income	2,775		2,726		49			2	%	7,793		6,384		1,409			22	%
Gain on sale of loans, net	67		169		(102		)	(60	)%	204		366		(162		)	(44	)%
Total core fees and income	31,592		39,067		(7,475		)	(19	)%	102,924		112,613		(9,689		)	(9	)%
Total other income	722		1,200		(478		)	(40	)%	1,228		2,178		(950		)	(44	)%
Total fees and other income	$	32,314	$	40,267	$	(7,953	)	(20	)%	$	104,152	$	114,791	$	(10,639	)	(9	)%

Total fees and other income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 was $40.3 million, an increase of $0.3~~2018 decreased $8.0 million, or 1%20%, compared to the same period in ~~2016. For~~2017. Total fees and other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, total fees and other income was $114.8 million, flat as compared to the same period in 2016. Factors affecting the increase in the three month period include higher fee income in the Wealth Management and Trust, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory segments due to increases in AUM, partially offset by decreases in banking fee income related to swap fees and in other income related to fair market value adjustments on derivative agreements. Factors affecting the balances in the nine month periods include decreases in banking fee income related to swap fees, partially offset by increases in fee income in the Investment Management, Wealth Advisory, and Wealth Management and Trust segments due to increases in AUM.

~~Investment management fee income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $11.3 million, an increase of $0.6~~2018 decreased $10.6 million, or 5%9%, compared to the same period in ~~2016. For~~2017. The decrease in total fees and other income for the three and nine ~~months ended September 30, 2017,~~month periods is primarily driven by the decrease in investment management fees as a result of the divestiture of Anchor in April 2018, partially offset by increased wealth advisory fees due to higher levels of AUM and increased other banking fee income ~~was $33.2 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2016.~~ driven by higher swap fees.

AUM ~~as of September 30, 2017~~ managed or advised by the Investment Managers was ~~$11.1~~$2.1 billion ~~an increase~~at September 30, 2018, a decrease of ~~$0.9~~$9.0 billion, ~~or 9%,~~ compared to ~~2016.~~September 30, 2017. The ~~increase is~~decrease was primarily ~~due to~~driven by the impact of the divestiture of Anchor in the second quarter of 2018, partially offset by net inflows of $0.1 million and positive market action of ~~$1.3 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $0.4~~$0.1 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

Wealth advisory fee income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $13.3 million, an increase of $0.5 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, wealth advisory fee income was $39.1 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3%, compared to the same period in 2016. AUM managed or advised by the Wealth Advisors was ~~$11.0~~$12.0 billion at September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, an increase of $1.0 billion, or ~~10%~~9%, compared to September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The increase ~~is due to~~in AUM was primarily driven by positive market action of $0.9 billion and net inflows of $0.1 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

Wealth management and trust fee income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $11.6 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 7%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, wealth management and trust fee income was $33.6 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 2%, compared to the same period in 2016. AUM ~~as of September 30, 2017~~ managed or advised by Boston Private Wealth was ~~$7.7~~$8.3 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of ~~$0.4~~$0.6 billion, or 5%8%, compared to September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The increase is ~~due to~~primarily driven by net inflows of $0.4 billion and positive market action of ~~$0.3 billion and net inflows of $0.1~~$0.2 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, 2018. However, AUM inflows during the third quarter of 2018 were at a lower effective fee rate than some of the AUM outflows from earlier in 2018 which led to a decrease of $0.1 million in fees when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2018 to the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Other banking fee income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 was $2.7 million, a decrease of $0.7~~2018 increased $0.1 million, or ~~21%~~2% , compared to the same period in ~~2016. For~~2017. Other banking fee income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, other banking fee income was $6.4 million, a decrease of $3.3~~2018 increased $1.4 million, or ~~34%~~22%, compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease for both the three and nine month periods is related~~increases were due to ~~decreases~~an increase in swap fee income ~~due to elevated 2016~~reflecting higher client demand for loan swap ~~agreements. These decreases were partially offset in both~~agreements for the three and nine ~~month periods by the~~months ended September 30, 2018 as well as an increase in Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) income ~~which is related~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 due to ~~the~~an additional ~~$50.0 million investment in~~purchase of BOLI in the first quarter of 2017.

Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $1.0 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 43%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, other income was $1.7 million, an increase of $1.0 million compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease for the three month period and the increase for the nine month period were related to fluctuations in gains and losses on fair market value adjustments on derivative agreements in 2016 that did not recur in 2017.

Operating ~~Expense.~~Expense



	Three months ended September 30,				$ Change			% Change		Nine months ended September 30,				$ Change			% Change
	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change		2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	38,944	$	44,912	$	(5,968	)	(13	)%	$	125,461	$	133,889	$	(8,428	)	(6	)%
Occupancy and equipment	8,164		7,944		220			3	%	24,141		22,412		1,729			8	%
Professional services	2,877		3,308		(431		)	(13	)%	8,926		9,728		(802		)	(8	)%
Marketing and business development	1,710		2,216		(506		)	(23	)%	5,373		5,847		(474		)	(8	)%
Information systems	6,233		5,282		951			18	%	18,889		16,161		2,728			17	%
Amortization of intangibles	750		1,426		(676		)	(47	)%	2,249		4,278		(2,029		)	(47	)%
FDIC insurance	674		647		27			4	%	2,126		2,292		(166		)	(7	)%
Restructuring	5,763		—		5,763			nm		5,763		—		5,763			nm
Other	3,442		3,611		(169		)	(5	)%	10,870		11,340		(470		)	(4	)%
Total operating expense	$	68,557	$	69,346	$	(789	)	(1	)%	$	203,798	$	205,947	$	(2,149	)	(1	)%

Total operating expense for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 was $69.3 million, an increase of $7.7~~2018 decreased $0.8 million, or ~~12%~~1%, compared to the same period in ~~2016. For~~2017 and operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, total operating expense was $205.9 million, an increase of $12.8~~2018 decreased $2.1 million, or 7%1%, compared to the same period in ~~2016. The changes for the three month period ended September 30,~~ 2017, ~~are~~ primarily due to ~~increases~~the divestiture of Anchor, as well as a decrease in salaries and employee benefits ~~occupancy and equipment, professional services, marketing and business development, and other expenses,~~expense, partially offset by decreases in contract services and data processing and FDIC insurance expenses. The changes for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017 are primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, professional services, other expenses, and marketing and business development, partially offset by decreases in contract services and data processing, FDIC insurance, and amortization of intangibles expenses. Additionally, the Company incurred noa restructuring ~~charges~~expense in the ~~three or nine months ended September 30, 2017~~third quarter of 2018 and ~~the three months ended September 30, 2016, and incurred restructuring charges of $2.0 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016.~~an increase in information systems expense.

Salaries and employee benefits expense, the largest component of operating expense, for the three ~~months ended September 30, 2017 was $45.2 million, an increase of $4.2 million, or 10%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the~~and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, salaries and employee benefits was $134.5 million, an increase of $10.4 million, or 8%,~~2018 decreased compared to the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2016. The increase for the three and nine month periods is~~2017, primarily due to ~~higher variable and performance based compensation, commissions and sales incentives, and stock compensation. Although~~ the ~~Company incurred~~

~~severance expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the majority~~divestiture of ~~the costs were categorized as restructuring expense, whereas there was severance expense categorized as salaries and employee benefits expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~Anchor.

Occupancy and equipment expense for the three ~~months ended September 30, 2017 was $11.3 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 19%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the~~and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, occupancy and equipment expense was $32.7 million, an increase of $3.7 million, or 13%,~~2018 increased compared to the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2016. The increase~~2017, primarily due to lease renewals and the related depreciation of leasehold improvements.

Information systems expense for the three and nine ~~month~~months ended September 30, 2018 increased compared to the same periods isin 2017, primarily due to an increase in technology service agreements, telecommunications and ~~technology~~telephone expenses.

Restructuring expense ~~and an increase in rent expense due to new office locations.~~

~~Professional services expense~~increased for the three ~~months ended September 30, 2017 was $3.3 million, an increase of $1.0 million, or 44%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the~~and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, professional services expense was $9.7~~2018 as the Company incurred a restructuring charge of $5.8 million ~~an increase~~in the third quarter of ~~$0.9 million, or 10%, compared~~2018, in connection with a previously announced reduction in force to the ~~same period~~Company’s workforce of approximately 7% of total staffing, intended to improve the Company’s operating efficiency and enhance earnings. Additional restructuring costs may be recognized in ~~2016. The increase for~~ the ~~three and nine month periods is primarily due to increases in recruitment and consulting expense, partially offset by decreases in legal expense related to loan workouts.~~fourth quarter of 2018.

In 2017, the Bank began working on an initiative to upgrade its information technology. This initiative required the Bank to hire additional employees with expertise in information technology. Recruiters were generally used in the placement of these professionals. The Bank has utilized consultants and temporary employees to assist with the ~~project~~initiative in addition to the new hires. Generally the expenditures in the preliminary project stage were expensed as incurred. Other expenditures related to the application development stage have been capitalized. The capitalized expenditures will be depreciated over the useful life of the asset when the asset is placed in service. The Bank has begun to place certain of these capitalized assets in service in 2018 and anticipates that the remaining capitalized assets will be placed in service ~~beginning~~ in ~~late 2017~~the fourth quarter of 2018 through early 2019.

Marketing and business development expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $2.2 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 37%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, marketing and business development expense was $5.8 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2016. The three month increase is primarily related to an increase in marketing expense in the Private Banking and Wealth Advisory segments. The nine month increase is primarily related to the timing of marketing programs in the Private Banking segment.

Contract services and data processing expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $1.6 million, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 14%, compared to the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, contract services and data processing expense was $4.8 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 9%, compared to the same period in 2016. The decreases for the three and nine month periods are primarily due to a decrease in custody and recordkeeping expenses.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$24.8 million.~~$28.9 million, which included a $12.7 million expense related to the sale of Anchor in the second quarter of 2018. The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~29.9%~~37.4%, compared to an effective tax rate of ~~31.0%~~29.9% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The effective tax rate for 2018 was higher than 2017 primarily due to the sale of Anchor, partially offset by the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the impact of the Tax Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017. See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9: Income Taxes” for further detail.

Financial Condition

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Discussion

September 30,
2017 December 31, 2016
Increase/
(decrease)

%
Change
(In thousands)
Assets:
Total cash and investments $ 1,446,071
$ 1,507,845
$ (61,774 ) (4 )%
Loans held for sale 1,957
3,464
(1,507 ) (44 )%
Total loans 6,413,201
6,114,354
298,847
5 %
Less: Allowance for loan losses 74,873
78,077
(3,204 ) (4 )%
Net loans 6,338,328
6,036,277
302,051
5 %
Goodwill and intangible assets, net 165,001
169,279
(4,278 ) (3 )%
Total other assets 318,041
253,609
64,432
25 %
Total assets $ 8,269,398
$ 7,970,474
$ 298,924
4 %
Liabilities and Equity:
Deposits $ 6,262,347
$ 6,085,146
$ 177,201
3 %
Total borrowings 1,049,039
980,192
68,847
7 %
Total other liabilities 127,069
119,683
7,386
6 %
Total liabilities 7,438,455
7,185,021
253,434
4 %
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests (“RNCI”) 15,882
16,972
(1,090 ) (6 )%
Total shareholders’ equity 815,061
768,481
46,580
6 %
Total liabilities, RNCI and shareholders’ equity $ 8,269,398
$ 7,970,474
$ 298,924
4 %

~~_____________________~~

~~nm not meaningful~~



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		Increase/ (decrease)			% Change
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Total cash and investments	$	1,280,169	$	1,425,418	$	(145,249	)	(10	)%
Loans held for sale	3,344		4,697		(1,353		)	(29	)%
Total loans	6,720,420		6,505,028		215,392			3	%
Less: Allowance for loan losses	73,500		74,742		(1,242		)	(2	)%
Net loans	6,646,920		6,430,286		216,634			3	%
Goodwill and intangible assets, net	89,432		91,681		(2,249		)	(2	)%
Total other assets	355,975		359,662		(3,687		)	(1	)%
Total assets	$	8,375,840	$	8,311,744	$	64,096		1	%
Liabilities and Equity:
Deposits	$	6,768,723	$	6,510,246	$	258,477		4	%
Total borrowings	707,652		862,213		(154,561		)	(18	)%
Total other liabilities	149,770		135,880		13,890			10	%
Total liabilities	7,626,145		7,508,339		117,806			2	%
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests (“RNCI”)	11,686		17,461		(5,775		)	(33	)%
Total shareholders’ equity	738,009		785,944		(47,935		)	(6	)%
Total liabilities, RNCI and shareholders’ equity	$	8,375,840	$	8,311,744	$	64,096		1	%

Total ~~Assets.~~assets. Total assets increased ~~$0.3~~$0.1 billion, or 1%, to ~~$8.3~~$8.4 billion at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$8.0~~$8.3 billion at December 31, ~~2016. This increase was~~2017, primarily ~~due to the~~driven by an increase in ~~loans.~~total loans, partially offset by a decrease in total cash and investments.

~~Cash~~Total cash and ~~Investments.~~investments. Total cash and investments (consisting of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and stock in the FHLB and ~~Federal Reserve Bank)~~the FRB) decreased ~~$61.8~~$145.2 million, or 4%10%, from December 31, 2017. The decrease on a point-in-time basis was primarily driven by a decrease of $107.0 million in available-for-sale investment securities and a decrease of $27.9 million in cash. The Company utilized proceeds from maturing investment securities and an increased volume of deposits to ~~$1.4 billion, or 17%~~pay down higher interest rate borrowings as opposed to purchasing additional investment securities. Additionally, cash decreased from December 31, 2017 due to the redemption of the 6.95% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D (“the Series D preferred stock”) in the second quarter of 2018. Total cash and investments represent 15% of total assets at September 30, ~~2017 from $1.5 billion, or 19%~~2018 and 17% of total assets at December 31, 2016. The decrease was due to the $74.3 million, or 6%, decrease in available-for-sale securities, and the $9.0 million, or 10% decrease in held-to-maturity securities, partially offset by the $17.6 million, or 40%, increase in stock in the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank and the $3.9 million, or 4%, increase in cash and cash equivalents. The changes in cash and investments were the net result of short-term fluctuations in liquidity due to changes in levels of deposits, borrowings and loans outstanding. Additionally, on July 28, 2017, Boston Private Bank & Trust Company became a member of the Federal Reserve System, which required the purchase of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.2017.

The majority of the investments held by the Company are held by the Bank. The Bank’s investment policy requires management to maintain a portfolio of securities which will provide liquidity necessary to facilitate funding of loans, to cover deposit fluctuations, and to mitigate the Bank’s overall balance sheet exposure to interest rate risk, while at the same time earning a satisfactory return on the funds invested. The securities in which the Bank may invest are subject to regulation and are generally limited to securities that are considered “investment grade.”

Investment maturities, ~~calls,~~redemptions, principal payments, and sales of securities, net of purchases, provided ~~$242.8~~$73.5 million of cash proceeds during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $89.3 million in the same period of 2017. The timing of sales and reinvestments is based on various factors, including management’s evaluation of interest rate trends, ~~the~~ credit risk, ~~of municipal securities~~ and the Company’s liquidity. The Company’s available-for-sale investment portfolio carried a total of ~~$6.9~~$1.3 million of unrealized gains and ~~$13.7~~$39.8 million of unrealized losses at September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$4.6~~$5.1 million of unrealized gains and ~~$23.7~~$17.2 million of unrealized losses at December 31, ~~2016.~~

2017.

No impairment losses were recognized through earnings related to investment securities during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~total amount of unrealized losses was~~Company does not consider these investments other-than-temporarily impaired as the decline in fair value on investments is primarily ~~due~~attributed to changes in interest rates ~~since the securities were purchased.~~and not due to credit quality or other risk factors.

Additionally, at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company held ~~$84.1~~$75.5 million and ~~$93.1~~$74.6 million, respectively, of held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost. All of the held-to-maturity securities held at September 30, 2018 were U.S. Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, or government-sponsored ~~entities, or U.S. Treasury securities.~~entities.

See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 4: Investments” for further details of the Company’s investment securities.

Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale ~~decreased $1.5 million, or 44%, to $2.0 million~~ at September 30, ~~2017 from $3.5~~2018 decreased $1.4 million, or 29%, compared to the balance at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The balance of loans held for sale usually relates to the timing and volume of residential loans originated for sale and the ultimate sale transaction which is typically executed within a short time following the loan origination. From time to time, the Company may also sell loans that have been held in the loan portfolio. The sale of such loans may improve the Bank’s liquidity and capital position or may provide the Bank additional flexibility for more profitable and strategic future lending opportunities.

Goodwill and intangible assets, net. Goodwill and intangible assets, ~~decreased $4.3 million, or 3%, to $165.0 million~~net at September 30, ~~2017 from $169.3~~2018 decreased $2.2 million, or 2%, compared to the balance at December 31, ~~2016. The decrease was~~2017 due to amortization of intangible assets. There was no change to goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets such as trade names are subject to annual impairment tests, or more frequently, if there is indication of impairment, based on guidance in ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. Long-lived intangible assets such as advisory contracts are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”).

Management performed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing during the fourth quarter of ~~2016~~2017 for applicable reporting units. The 2016 goodwill impairment testing indicated that Boston Private Wealth failed Step 1 and the resulting Step 2 test indicated goodwill impairment of $9.5 million. The estimated fair value for all other applicable reporting units exceeded the carrying value in 2016, and as a result no other impairment was evident. There was no additional testing required for long-lived intangible assets in 2016.

~~The~~ estimated fair value of BOS, KLS, and Boston Private Wealth ~~as a result of~~each exceeded their carrying value in 2017. Management will perform the annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing for this year during the fourth quarter ~~2016 impairment testing was $68.0 million as compared to a carrying value~~ of $76.9 million, resulting in a deficit of $8.9 million, or 11.6%. Even though the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge for Boston Private Wealth in 2016, there could be additional goodwill impairment in the future should Boston Private Wealth’s actual results not meet projections. In addition to financial results, other inputs to the valuation, such as the discount rate and market assumptions, could negatively affect the estimated fair value of Boston Private Wealth in the future. The Company has concluded that no interim goodwill impairment triggering event has occurred and no interim goodwill impairment testing was necessary at September 30, 2017. The Company will again be performing its annual goodwill impairment testing in the fourth quarter.

The estimated fair value of Anchor as a result of the fourth quarter 2016 impairment testing was $87.0 million as compared to a carrying value of $81.6 million, an excess of $5.4 million, or 6.6%. Due to the narrow margin between the fair value and the carrying value of Anchor, Anchor will continue to be at risk for potential goodwill impairment. The Company has concluded that no interim goodwill impairment triggering event occurred and no interim goodwill impairment testing was necessary at September 30, 2017. The Company will again be performing its annual goodwill impairment testing in the fourth quarter.2018.

Total other assets. Total other assets, as presented in the table above, consists of the following line items from the consolidated balance sheet: other real estate owned (“OREO”) ~~(if any)~~, if any; premises and ~~equipment,~~equipment; fees ~~receivable,~~receivable; accrued interest ~~receivable,~~receivable; deferred income taxes, ~~net,~~net; and other ~~assets.~~assets, including assets held for sale, if any. Total other assets ~~increased $64.4~~at September 30, 2018 decreased $3.7 million, or ~~25%~~1%, compared to the balance at December 31, 2017. These changes resulted from the following factors:

Other assets, which consist primarily of BOLI, investment in partnerships, prepaid expenses, the fair value of interest rate derivatives, other receivables, and assets held for sale, if any, decreased $14.0 million, or 5%, to ~~$318.0~~$245.5 million at September 30, ~~2017 as compared to $253.6~~2018 from $259.5 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to the ~~result~~divestiture of ~~increases~~Anchor in ~~other~~the second quarter of 2018, which had been classified as assets held for sale at December 31, 2017. This was partially offset by ~~a decrease in deferred income taxes, net, OREO,~~the $14.8 million current receivable balance for the future revenue share with Anchor as part of the divestiture agreement.

Premises and ~~fees receivable.~~

~~OREO decreased $1.7~~equipment increased $9.8 million, or 26%, to ~~zero~~$47.4 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$1.7~~$37.6 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. In 2017, the ~~one property held~~Bank began working on an initiative to upgrade its information technology. The increase was primarily due to expenditures related to this initiative. Generally the expenditures in ~~OREO at December 31, 2016 was sold for a small loss.~~the preliminary project stage were expensed as incurred. Other expenditures related to the application development stage have been capitalized. The capitalized expenditures will be depreciated over the useful life of the asset when the asset is placed in service. The capitalized assets will continue to be placed in service throughout the fourth quarter of 2018 and into 2019.

Deferred income taxes, net, decreased ~~$9.4~~$1.2 million, or ~~17%~~4%, to ~~$46.1~~$27.8 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$55.5~~$29.0 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The decrease was primarily ~~due to~~driven by deferred income tax expense, partially offset by the current year tax effect of other comprehensive ~~income.~~income/ (loss). At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, no valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset was required due primarily to the expectation of

future taxable ~~income as well as the availability of current and historical taxable~~ income. ~~Our~~The Company’s use of these deferred tax benefits may depend on a number of factors including future changes in laws or regulations relating to tax rates, tax credits, tax deductions, and net operating losses. ~~A decrease in tax rates would require us to revalue the net deferred tax assets lower with a corresponding income tax expense.~~

Other assets, which consist primarily of BOLI, prepaid expenses, investment in partnerships, the fair value of interest rate derivatives, and other receivables, increased $70.3 million, or 54%, to $201.0 million at September 30, 2017 from $130.8 million at December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an additional $50.0 million investment in BOLI policies, an increase in income taxes receivable and the purchase of additional cost method investments.

Deposits. Deposits ~~increased $177.2 million, or 3%, to $6.3 billion,~~ at September 30, ~~2017 from $6.1 billion~~2018 increased $258.5 million, or 4%, compared to the balance at December 31, ~~2016.~~ 2017, primarily due to the Company’s continued focus on increasing the deposit base to fund loan growth. Average total deposits for the three months ended September 30, 2018 increased 5% from the same period in 2017 as shown in

the average balance sheet. In September 2018, the Company began a deposit sweep program to sweep Boston Private Wealth excess customer cash balances into a money market deposit account held at the Bank, as compared to a non-affiliated financial company. Included in the deposits balance at September 30, 2018 and accounting for a portion of the increase from December 31, 2017 is $119.8 million of Boston Private Wealth money market deposit sweep balances. For further details, see “Results of Operations” above.

Deposits are the principal source of the Bank’s funds for use in lending, investments, and liquidity. ~~Certificates of deposits represented approximately 11% and 10% of total deposits at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.~~ Deposit levels can fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of large short-term transactions by commercial clients. Seasonality can also affect the deposit balances.

As a general matter, deposits are a cheaper source of funds than borrowings, because interest rates paid for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market interest rates, competitive pressures, or otherwise, the amount of deposits at the Bank decreases relative to its overall banking operations, the Bank may be limited in its ability to grow its loan portfolio or may have to rely more heavily on higher cost borrowings as a source of funds in the future.

The following table presents the composition of the Company’s deposits at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016				September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Balance		as a % of total		Balance		as a % of total		Balance		as a % of total		Balance		as a % of total
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Demand deposits (noninterest-bearing)	$	1,850,833	30	%	$	1,753,648	29	%	$	2,001,275	30	%	$	2,025,690	31	%
NOW (1)	636,013		10	%	578,657		9	%	568,148		8	%	645,361		10	%
Savings	74,333		1	%	74,162		1	%	72,967		1	%	70,935		1	%
Money market (1)	3,009,779		48	%	3,102,048		51	%	3,363,062		50	%	3,121,811		48	%
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 (1)	265,402		4	%	236,001		4	%	260,134		4	%	250,070		4	%
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or greater	425,987		7	%	340,630		6	%
Certificates of deposit $100,000 or more to less than $250,000									85,966		1	%	82,665		1	%
Certificates of deposit $250,000 or more									417,171		6	%	313,714		5	%
Total deposits	$	6,262,347	100	%	$	6,085,146	100	%	$	6,768,723	100	%	$	6,510,246	100	%

_____________________


(1)	Includes brokered deposits of ~~$562.5~~$529.9 million ~~$738.3~~and $780.2 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

~~Borrowings.~~Total borrowings. Total borrowings (consisting of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased (if any), FHLB borrowings, and junior subordinated debentures) ~~increased $68.8 million, or 7%, to $1.0 billion~~ at September 30, ~~2017 from $1.0 billion~~2018 decreased $154.6 million, or 18%, compared to the balance at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017 primarily driven by cash and cash flows from investment securities being used to pay down outstanding borrowings.

FHLB borrowings ~~increased $78.6~~decreased $251.8 million, or ~~11%~~36%, to ~~$812.8~~$441.8 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$734.2~~$693.7 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to ~~loan growth in excess of deposit growth in 2017.~~asset liability management considerations to utilize cash proceeds from investment security maturities and deposits to reduce the outstanding FHLB borrowings balance. FHLB borrowings are generally used to provide additional funding for loan growth when it is in excess of deposit growth and to manage interest rate risk, but can also be used as an additional source of liquidity for the Bank.

From time to time, the Company purchases federal funds from the FHLB and other banking institutions to supplement its liquidity position. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had ~~$70.0 million federal funds purchased outstanding. The Company had $80.0~~$120.0 million in federal funds purchased outstanding compared to $30.0 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Repurchase agreements increased ~~$0.3~~$7.3 million to ~~$59.9~~$39.5 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$59.6~~$32.2 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Repurchase agreements are generally linked to commercial demand deposit accounts with an overnight sweep feature.

Total other liabilities. Total other liabilities, which consist primarily of accrued interest, accrued bonus, ~~the fair value of~~ interest rate derivatives, the unfunded portion of partnership investment commitments, and other accrued expenses, ~~increased $7.4 million, or 6%, to $127.1 million~~ at September 30, ~~2017 from $119.7~~2018 increased $13.9 million, or 10%, compared to the balance at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The increase was primarily ~~due to~~driven by increased swap activity, additional ~~landlord allowances~~unfunded partnership investment commitments, and ~~deferred rent, partially offset by the payment in the first quarter of 2017 of~~ accrued ~~variable compensation, bonuses and employee benefits that had been accrued for at December 31, 2016.~~severance.

Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality

Loans. Total ~~portfolio~~ loans increased ~~$298.8~~$215.4 million, or 5%3%, to ~~$6.4~~$6.7 billion, or 80% of total assets, at September 30, 2018, from $6.5 billion, or 78% of total assets, at ~~September 30, 2017, from $6.1 billion, or 77% of total assets, at~~ December 31, ~~2016. Increases were recorded~~2017. The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio based on the portfolio segment and changes in ~~residential~~balances as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	583,214	$	520,992	$	62,222		12	%
Commercial tax-exempt	438,807		418,698		20,109			5	%
Total commercial and industrial	1,022,021		939,690		82,331			9	%
Commercial real estate	2,399,080		2,440,220		(41,140		)	(2	)%
Construction and land	197,524		164,990		32,534			20	%
Residential	2,862,879		2,682,533		180,346			7	%
Home equity	93,390		99,958		(6,568		)	(7	)%
Consumer and other	145,526		177,637		(32,111		)	(18	)%
Total loans	$	6,720,420	$	6,505,028	$	215,392		3	%

The ability to grow the loan portfolio is partially related to the Bank’s ability to increase deposit levels. Deposits are generally a cheaper source of funds than borrowings, because interest rates paid for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market interest rates, competitive pressures, or otherwise, the amount of deposits at the Bank decreases relative to its overall banking operations, the Bank may be limited in its ability to grow its loan portfolio or may have to rely more heavily on higher cost borrowings as a source of funds in the future. The Bank’s use of wholesale funding is limited as a result of internal policies such as the loans of $220.9 million, or 9%; commercial real estate loans of $60.9 million, or 3%; commercial tax exempt loans of $32.7 million, or 8%; construction and land loans of $13.4 million, or 13%; and commercial and industrial loans of $6.9 million, or 1%, partially offset by decreases in consumer and other loans of $24.4 million, or 12%; and home equity loans of $11.6 million, or 10%.to deposits ratio.

The Bank specializes in lending to individuals, real estate investors, and middle market businesses, including corporations, partnerships, associations and nonprofit organizations. Loans made by the Bank to individuals may include residential mortgage loans and mortgage loans on investment or vacation properties, unsecured and secured personal lines of credit, home equity loans, and overdraft protection. Loans made by the Bank to businesses include commercial and mortgage loans, revolving lines of credit, working capital loans, equipment financing, community lending programs, and construction and land loans. The types and sizes of loans the Bank originates are limited by regulatory requirements.

The Bank’s loans are affected by the economic and real estate markets in which they are located. Generally, commercial real estate, construction, and land loans are affected more than residential loans in an economic downturn.

In August of 2017, parts of Texas experienced widespread damage and flooding from Hurricane Harvey. In September of 2017, parts of Florida and the Caribbean experienced widespread damage and flooding from Hurricane Irma. Additionally, in September and October of 2017, parts of northern California experienced damage resulting from several widespread wildfires. Surveys of the Bank’s borrowers and collateral located within these areas indicated that most customers experienced only minor damage to the Bank’s underlying collateral which, to date, has been covered by property insurance. However, the Bank continues to assess the extent of the damage and the insurance coverage in place. In addition, the ongoing businesses of customers in these impacted areas could be interrupted which could adversely impact their ability to repay their loans. The Bank is continuing to communicate with borrowers in the affected areas and is evaluating any financial impact.

The Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio, the largest portfolio segment after residential, includes loans secured by the following types of collateral at September 30, 2017: $706.4 million secured by multifamily and residential investment property; $618.8 million secured by retail property; $543.1 million secured by office and medical property; $186.4 million secured by manufacturing, industrial, and warehouse property; $145.3 million secured by hospitality property; and $163.2 million secured by other property. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio as of ~~December 31, 2016 included loans secured by~~ the following types of collateral: $674.2 million secured by multifamily and residential investment property; $660.7 million secured by retail property; $466.8 million secured by office and medical property; $195.9 million secured by manufacturing, industrial, and warehouse property; $116.0 million secured by hospitality property; and $188.6 million secured by other property.dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Multifamily and residential investment	$	700,213	$	729,792
Retail	618,350		634,843
Office and medical	534,815		543,894
Manufacturing, industrial, and warehouse	217,766		197,950
Hospitality	195,432		148,354
Other	132,504		185,387
Commercial real estate	$	2,399,080	$	2,440,220

Geographic concentration. The following ~~table presents~~tables present the Company’s outstanding loan balance concentrations at the dates indicated based on the location of the regional offices to which they are attributed.


	As of September 30, 2017																As of September 30, 2018
	New England				San Francisco Bay Area				Southern California				Total				New England				San Francisco Bay Area				Southern California				Total
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
	(In thousands)																(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	503,322	8	%	$	50,686	1	%	$	64,248	1	%	$	618,256	9	%	$	460,409	7	%	$	41,256	1	%	$	81,549	1	%	$	583,214	9	%
Commercial tax exempt	320,172		5	%	99,540		2	%	11,638		—	%	431,350		7	%
Commercial tax-exempt																	330,753		5	%	96,775		1	%	11,279		—	%	438,807		6	%
Commercial real estate	988,788		15	%	698,148		11	%	676,223		11	%	2,363,159		37	%	1,043,494		16	%	724,243		11	%	631,343		9	%	2,399,080		36	%
Construction and land	61,635		1	%	20,893		—	%	35,763		1	%	118,291		2	%	114,411		2	%	40,755		—	%	42,358		1	%	197,524		3	%
Residential	1,558,587		24	%	510,956		8	%	531,245		8	%	2,600,788		40	%	1,650,989		25	%	554,502		8	%	657,388		10	%	2,862,879		43	%
Home equity	72,149		1	%	26,052		1	%	9,026		—	%	107,227		2	%	61,291		1	%	19,769		—	%	12,330		—	%	93,390		1	%
Consumer and other	150,309		2	%	15,302		—	%	8,519		—	%	174,130		3	%	121,685		2	%	14,228		—	%	9,613		—	%	145,526		2	%
Total loans (1)	$	3,654,962	56	%	$	1,421,577	23	%	$	1,336,662	21	%	$	6,413,201	100	%	$	3,783,032	58	%	$	1,491,528	21	%	$	1,445,860	21	%	$	6,720,420	100	%


	As of December 31, 2016																As of December 31, 2017
	New England				San Francisco Bay Area				Southern California				Total				New England				San Francisco Bay Area				Southern California				Total
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
	(In thousands)																(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	493,451	8	%	$	50,578	1	%	$	67,341	1	%	$	611,370	10	%	$	438,322	7	%	$	23,311	—	%	$	59,359	1	%	$	520,992	8	%
Commercial tax exempt	317,691		5	%	69,064		1	%	11,849		—	%	398,604		6	%
Commercial tax-exempt																	305,792		5	%	101,340		1	%	11,566		—	%	418,698		6	%
Commercial real estate	1,012,284		17	%	637,042		10	%	652,918		11	%	2,302,244		38	%	1,002,092		15	%	725,454		11	%	712,674		11	%	2,440,220		37	%
Construction and land	47,434		1	%	29,629		1	%	27,776		—	%	104,839		2	%	86,874		1	%	27,891		1	%	50,225		1	%	164,990		3	%
Residential	1,456,592		24	%	473,102		8	%	450,167		7	%	2,379,861		39	%	1,598,072		24	%	512,189		8	%	572,272		9	%	2,682,533		41	%
Home equity	87,280		2	%	25,129		—	%	6,408		—	%	118,817		2	%	67,435		1	%	22,462		1	%	10,061		—	%	99,958		2	%
Consumer and other	186,680		3	%	7,517		—	%	4,422		—	%	198,619		3	%	149,022		3	%	14,707		—	%	13,908		—	%	177,637		3	%
Total loans (1)	$	3,601,412	59	%	$	1,292,061	21	%	$	1,220,881	20	%	$	6,114,354	100	%	$	3,647,609	56	%	$	1,427,354	22	%	$	1,430,065	22	%	$	6,505,028	100	%

________________________


(1)	Regional percentage totals may not reconcile due to rounding.

Allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of outstanding loan balances and totaled ~~$74.9~~$73.5 million and ~~$78.1~~$74.7 million as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $1.2 million to $73.5 million, or 1.09% of total loans, as of September 30, ~~2017 decreased $3.2~~2018 from $74.7 million, ~~from~~or 1.15% of total loans, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. The decrease in the overall allowance for loan losses was due to a decline in ~~the~~criticized loans and a decline in loss factors, partially offset by loan growth and the mix in the loan portfolio. The provision credit for loan losses in the third quarter of 2018 was primarily driven by loan recoveries, the mix in the loan portfolio, ~~change in~~partially offset by the volume and type of criticized loans and loan growth in certain portfolio segments. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased 11 basis points to 1.17% as of September 30, 2017 from 1.28% as of December 31, 2016. The decrease in the ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans is due to a decline in the loss factors, a combinationimpact of the ~~mix~~increase in ~~the loan portfolio, and the change in the volume and type of~~ criticized loans. See ~~Part~~Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 7: Allowance for Loan Losses” for an analysis of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.

An analysis of the risk in the loan portfolio as well as management judgment is used to determine the estimated appropriate amount of the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s allowance for loan losses is comprised of three primary components (general reserves, allocated reserves on non-impaired special mention and substandard loans, and allocated reserves on impaired loans). See Part II. Item 8. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6: Allowance for Loan Losses” and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 for further information.

The following table presents a summary of loans charged-off, net of recoveries, by geography for the periods indicated. The geography assigned to the data is based on the location of the regional offices to which the loans are attributed.


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017			2016			2018		2017		2018			2017
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Net loans (charged-off)/ recovered:
New England	$	73	$	1,704	$	819		$	834		$	232	$	73	$	(126	)	$	819
San Francisco Bay Area	206		318		3,097			4,309			706		206		864			3,097
Southern California	17		32		(393		)	(168		)	47		17		311			(393		)
Total net loans (charged-off)/ recovered	$	296	$	2,054	$	3,523		$	4,975		$	985	$	296	$	1,049		$	3,523

~~Net~~There were $1.0 million in net recoveries ~~of $0.3 million were~~ recorded in the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$2.1~~$0.3 million of net recoveries for the same period of ~~2016. The $3.5 million in net recoveries recorded in the first nine months of 2017 related primarily to commercial real estate loans.~~2017.

~~Despite the current year net recoveries on previously charged-off commercial loans (which include construction and land loans, commercial real estate, and commercial and industrial loans), the~~The Company believes that commercial loans represent the greatest risk of loss due to the size and nature of these loans and the related ~~collateral.~~collateral, if applicable. Local economic and business conditions in the markets where our offices are located have a significant impact on our commercial loan customers and their ability to service their loans.

Nonperforming assets. The Company’s nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and OREO, if any. OREO, if any, consists of real estate acquired through foreclosure proceedings and real estate acquired through acceptance of deeds in lieu of foreclosure. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, nonperforming assets totaled ~~$13.6~~$12.2 million, or ~~0.16%~~0.15% of total assets, a decrease of ~~$5.4~~$2.1 million, or ~~28%~~15%, compared to ~~$19.0~~$14.3 million, or ~~0.24%~~0.17% of total assets, as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Bank’s policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on a loan when the collectability of principal or interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement is in doubt. Despite a loan having a current payment status, if the Bank has reason to believe it may not collect all principal and interest on the loan in accordance with the related contractual terms, the Bank will generally discontinue the accrual of interest income and will apply any future interest payments received to principal. Of the ~~$13.6~~$12.1 million of loans on nonaccrual status as of September 30, ~~2017, $6.3~~2018, $2.3 million, or ~~46%~~19%, had a current payment status, ~~$0.5~~$0.3 million, or 4%2%, were 30-89 days past due, and ~~$6.8~~$9.5 million, or ~~50%~~79%, were 90 days or more past due. Of the ~~$17.3~~$14.3 million of loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, ~~2016, $5.1~~2017, $1.3 million, or ~~29%~~9%, had a current payment status, ~~$2.2~~$3.4 million, or ~~13%~~24%, were 30-89 days past due, and ~~$10.0~~$9.6 million, or ~~58%~~67%, were 90 days or more past due.

The Bank continues to evaluate the underlying collateral of each nonperforming loan and pursue the collection of interest and principal. Where appropriate, the Bank obtains updated appraisals on collateral. Reductions in fair values of the collateral for nonaccrual loans, if they are collateral dependent, could result in additional future provision for loan losses depending on the timing and severity of the decline. See Part I. Item 1. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 6: Loans ~~Receivable”~~Portfolio and Credit Quality” for further information on nonperforming loans.

The Bank’s policy for returning a loan to accrual status requires the loan to be brought current and for the client to show a history of making timely payments (generally six consecutive months). For nonaccruing ~~troubled debt restructured~~TDR loans, ~~(“TDRs”),~~ a return to accrual status generally requires timely payments for a period of six months in accordance with restructured terms, along with meeting other criteria.

Delinquencies. The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. All loan types are reported past due when one scheduled payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. Loans 30-89 days past due decreased ~~$9.8~~$13.4 million, or ~~65%~~54%, to ~~$5.3~~$11.6 million as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$15.1~~$25.0 million as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2017, with the decrease primarily due to the number of days in September as compared to the number of days in December. Loan delinquencies can be attributed to many factors, such as continuing weakness in, or deteriorating, economic conditions in the region in which the collateral is located, the loss of a tenant or lower lease rates for commercial borrowers, ~~renewal and administrative issues,~~ or the loss of income for consumers and the resulting liquidity impacts on the borrowers. Further deterioration in the credit condition of these delinquent loans could lead to the loans going to nonaccrual status and/or being downgraded. Downgrades would generally result in additional provision for loan losses. Past due loans may be included with accruing substandard loans.

In certain instances, although very infrequently, loans that have become 90 days or more past due may remain on accrual status if the value of the collateral securing the loan is sufficient to cover principal and interest and the loan is in the

process of collection. There were no loans 90 days or more past due, but still accruing, ~~respectively,~~ as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Impaired Loans. When management determines that it is probable that the Bank will not collect all principal and interest on a loan in accordance with the original loan terms, the loan is considered impaired. Certain impaired loans may continue to accrue interest based on factors such as the restructuring terms, if any, the historical payment performance, the value of collateral, and the financial condition of the borrower. Impaired commercial loans and impaired construction loans are typically, in accordance with ASC 310, individually evaluated for impairment. Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans may be collectively evaluated for impairment. Such groups of loans may include, but are not limited to, residential loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans. However, if the terms of any of such loans are modified in a troubled debt restructuring, then such loans would be individually evaluated for impairment in the allowance for loan ~~and lease~~ losses.

Loans that are individually evaluated for impairment require an analysis to determine the amount of impairment, if any. For collateral dependent loans, impairment would be indicated as a result of the carrying value of the loan exceeding either the estimated collateral value, less costs to sell, or, for loans not considered to be collateral dependent, the net present value of the projected cash flow, discounted at the loan’s contractual effective interest rate. Generally, when a collateral dependent loan becomes impaired, an updated appraisal of the collateral, if appropriate, is obtained. If the impaired loan has not been upgraded to a performing status within a reasonable amount of time, the Bank will continue to obtain updated appraisals, as deemed necessary, especially during periods of declining property values. Normally, shortfalls in the analysis of collateral dependent loans would result in the impairment amount being charged-off to the allowance for loan losses. Shortfalls on cash flow dependent loans may be carried as specific allocations to the general reserve unless a known loss is determined to have occurred, in which case such known loss is charged-off. Based on the impairment analysis, the provision could be higher or lower than the amount of provision associated with a loan prior to its classification as impaired. See Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 for detail on the Company’s treatment of impaired loans in the allowance for loan losses.

Impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment in the allowance for loan losses totaled ~~$21.6~~$14.0 million as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, a decrease of ~~$4.4~~$8.6 million, or ~~17%~~38%, compared to ~~$26.0~~$22.6 million as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. As of September 30, ~~2017, $8.7~~2018, $4.1 million of the individually evaluated impaired loans had ~~$0.8~~$1.2 million in specific reserve allocations. The remaining ~~$12.9~~$9.9 million of individually evaluated impaired loans did not have specific reserve allocations due to the adequacy of collateral, prior charge-offs taken, interest collected and applied to principal, or a combination of these items. As of December 31, ~~2016, $11.4~~2017, $8.1 million of individually evaluated impaired loans had ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million in specific reserve allocations, and the remaining ~~$14.6~~$14.5 million of individually evaluated impaired loans did not have specific reserve allocations.

The Bank may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans as a concession to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty. Such loans are classified as TDRs and are included in impaired loans. TDRs typically result from the Bank’s loss mitigation activities which, among other things, could include rate reductions, payment extensions, and/or principal forgiveness. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, TDRs totaled ~~$14.7~~$8.2 million and ~~$18.1~~$13.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2017, $11.5~~2018, $5.2 million of the ~~$14.7~~$8.2 million in TDRs were on accrual status. As of December 31, ~~2016, $12.4~~2017, $11.1 million of the ~~$18.1~~$13.6 million in TDRs were on accrual status.

Potential Problem Loans. Loans that evidence weakness or potential weakness related to repayment history, the borrower’s financial condition, or other factors are reviewed by the Bank’s management to determine if the loan should be adversely classified. Delinquent loans may or may not be adversely classified depending upon management’s judgment with respect to each individual loan. The Bank classifies certain loans as “substandard,” “doubtful,” or “loss” based on criteria consistent with guidelines provided by banking regulators. Potential problem loans consist of accruing ~~substandard~~classified loans where known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in classification of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic conditions may worsen or other factors which may impact borrowers and the potential problem loans. Triggering events for loan downgrades include updated appraisal information, inability of borrowers to cover debt service payments, loss of tenants or notification by the tenant of non-renewal of lease, inability of borrowers to sell completed construction projects, and the inability of borrowers to sell properties. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that other loans will not become 90 days or more past due, be placed on nonaccrual, be restructured, or require increased allowance coverage and provision for loan losses.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank has identified ~~$53.7~~$55.4 million in potential problem loans, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$10.0~~$2.0 million, or ~~16%~~4%, compared to ~~$63.7~~$53.4 million as of December 31, ~~2016. This decrease was primarily due to one CRE loan for $9.2 million which was paid off in April~~ 2017. Numerous factors impact the level of potential problem loans including economic conditions and real estate values. These factors affect the borrower’s liquidity and, in some cases, the borrower’s ability to comply with loan covenants such as debt service coverage. ~~When~~For instance, when there is a loss of a major tenant in a commercial real estate building, the appraised value of the building generally declines. Loans may be downgraded when this occurs as a result of the additional risk to the borrower in obtaining a new tenant in a timely manner and negotiating a lease with similar or better terms than the previous tenant. In many cases, these loans are still current and paying as agreed, although future performance may be impacted.

The following table presents a rollforward of nonaccrual loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


	As of and for the three months ended September 30,						As of and for the nine months ended September 30,						As of and for the three months ended September 30,						As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans, beginning of period	$	16,176		$	19,188		$	17,315		$	26,571		$	15,651		$	16,176		$	14,295		$	17,315
Transfers in to nonaccrual status	578			2,430			8,294			7,566			3,901			578			8,819			8,294
Transfers out to OREO	—			—			—			(1,944		)	—			—			(108		)	—
Transfers out to accrual status	(1,146		)	(581		)	(2,686		)	(1,855		)	(2,122		)	(1,146		)	(3,914		)	(2,686		)
Charge-offs	(38		)	(337		)	(496		)	(3,102		)	—			(38		)	(514		)	(496		)
Paid off/ paid down	(1,947		)	(4,209		)	(8,804		)	(10,745		)	(5,333		)	(1,947		)	(6,481		)	(8,804		)
Nonaccrual loans, end of period	$	13,623		$	16,491		$	13,623		$	16,491		$	12,097		$	13,623		$	12,097		$	13,623

The following table presents a summary of credit quality by geography, based on the location of the regional offices:


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
New England	$	7,380	$	10,081	$	5,131	$	6,061
San Francisco Bay Area	1,494		2,989		1,169		1,473
Southern California	4,749		4,245		5,797		6,761
Total nonaccrual loans	$	13,623	$	17,315	$	12,097	$	14,295
Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing:
New England	$	4,664	$	10,311	$	9,193	$	19,725
San Francisco Bay Area	430		591		1,651		1,911
Southern California	198		4,235		763		3,412
Total loans 30-89 days past due	$	5,292	$	15,137	$	11,607	$	25,048
Accruing substandard loans:
Accruing classified loans:
New England	$	8,196	$	10,972	$	10,083	$	10,911
San Francisco Bay Area	11,622		15,890		24,252		11,615
Southern California	33,923		36,809		21,045		30,826
Total accruing substandard loans	$	53,741	$	63,671
Total accruing classified loans					$	55,380	$	53,352

The following table presents a summary of credit quality by loan type. The loan type assigned to the credit quality data is based on the purpose of the loan.


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	968	$	572	$	1,968	$	748
Commercial tax-exempt					—		—
Commercial real estate	2,601		4,583		546		1,985
Construction and land	206		179		—		110
Residential	8,765		10,908		6,798		8,470
Home equity	1,062		1,072		2,773		2,840
Consumer and other	21		1		12		142
Total nonaccrual loans	$	13,623	$	17,315	$	12,097	$	14,295
Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing:
Commercial and industrial	$	959	$	1,619	$	4,331	$	11,752
Commercial tax-exempt					—		—
Commercial real estate	907		3,096		987		4,043
Construction and land	413		—		—		—
Residential	226		4,182		4,518		8,874
Home equity	2,202		245		1,768		355
Consumer and other	585		5,995		3		24
Total loans 30-89 days past due	$	5,292	$	15,137	$	11,607	$	25,048
Accruing substandard loans:
Accruing classified loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	8,138	$	9,277	$	20,515	$	10,951
Commercial tax-exempt					4,052		—
Commercial real estate	37,306		49,696		29,045		34,455
Construction and land	6,688		3,297		446		6,596
Residential	1,358		1,399		1,322		1,349
Home equity	—		—		—		—
Consumer and other	251		2		—		1
Total accruing substandard loans	$	53,741	$	63,671
Total accruing classified loans					$	55,380	$	53,352

Liquidity

Liquidity is defined as the Company’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet its needs for day-to-day operations and material long and short-term commitments. Liquidity risk is the risk of potential loss if the Company were unable to meet its funding requirements at a reasonable cost. The Company manages its liquidity based on demand, commitments, specific events and uncertainties to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. The Company’s objective in managing liquidity is to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers as well as earnings enhancement opportunities in a changing marketplace.

The following table presents certain liquidity measurements as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	92,634		$	120,541		$	(27,907	)	(23	)%
Investment securities available-for-sale	1,063,340			1,170,328			(106,988		)	(9	)%
LESS: Securities pledged against current borrowings and derivatives	(47,777		)	(38,779		)	(8,998		)	23	%
Subtotal	$	1,108,197		$	1,252,090		$	(143,893	)	(11	)%
As a percent of assets	13		%	15		%

Access to additional FHLB borrowings	1,403,373			1,228,008			175,365			14	%
Subtotal	$	2,511,570		$	2,480,098		$	31,472		1	%
As a percent of assets	30		%	30		%
As a percent of deposits	37		%	38		%

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents amounted to ~~$110.4~~$92.6 million. The Holding Company’s cash and cash equivalents amounted to ~~$63.0~~$46.4 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Management believes that the Holding Company and its affiliates, including the Bank, have adequate liquidity to meet their commitments for the foreseeable future.

Management is responsible for establishing and monitoring liquidity targets as well as strategies to meet these targets. At September 30, ~~2017~~2018, consolidated cash and cash equivalents and investment securities available-for-sale, ~~securities,~~ less securities pledged against current borrowings and derivatives, amounted to ~~$1.2~~$1.1 billion, or ~~15%~~13% of total assets, compared to $1.3 billion, or ~~16%~~15% of total assets, at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Future loan growth may depend upon the Company’s ability ~~to continue~~ to grow its core deposit levels. In addition, the Company has access to available borrowings through the FHLB totaling ~~$1.0~~$1.4 billion at September 30, ~~2017, compared to $0.9~~2018, which increased from $1.2 billion at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017, as the Company decreased its usage of FHLB borrowings in 2018. Combined, this liquidity totals ~~$2.2~~$2.5 billion, or ~~27%~~30% of assets and ~~36%~~37% of ~~total~~ deposits, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$2.2~~$2.5 billion, or ~~28%~~30% of assets and ~~37%~~38% of ~~total~~ deposits, at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Bank has various internal policies and guidelines regarding liquidity, both on- and off-balance sheet, loans to assets ratio, and limits on the use of wholesale funds. These policies and/or guidelines require certain minimum or maximum balances or ratios be maintained at all times. In light of the provisions in the Bank’s internal liquidity policies and guidelines, the Bank will carefully manage the amount and timing of future loan growth along with its relevant liquidity policies and balance sheet guidelines. As a general matter, deposits are a cheaper source of funds than borrowings, because interest rates paid for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market interest rates, competitive pressures, or otherwise, the amount of deposits at the Bank decreases relative to its overall banking operations, the Bank may be limited in its ability to grow its loan portfolio or may have to rely more heavily on higher cost borrowings as a source of funds in the future.

Holding Company Liquidity. The Company and some of the Company’s majority-owned affiliates hold put and call options that would require the Company to purchase (and the noncontrolling interest owners of the majority-owned affiliates to sell) the remaining noncontrolling interests in these companies at either a contractually predetermined fair value, a multiple of EBITDA, or fair value, as determined by the respective agreements. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the estimated maximum redemption value for these affiliates related to outstanding put options was ~~$15.9~~$11.7 million, all of which could be redeemed within the next 12 months, under certain circumstances, and is classified on the consolidated balance sheets as redeemable noncontrolling interests. These put and call options are discussed in detail in Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 14: Noncontrolling Interests” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Holding Company’s primary sources of funds are dividends from its affiliates and access to the capital and debt markets. The Holding Company recognized ~~$3.9~~$1.7 million in net income from discontinued operations during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 as the final payment related to a revenue sharing agreement with Westfield. The Company will not receive additional income from Westfield ~~Capital Management~~now that the final payment has been received.

Although not a primary source of funds, the Holding Company ~~LLC (“Westfield”). This~~has generated liquidity from the sale of affiliates in the past and also generated additional funds at the time of the Anchor sale closing in April 2018. Pursuant to the Anchor sale agreement, the Holding Company will be entitled to future revenue sharing ~~agreement is~~payments that had a net present value of $15.4 million in ~~effect through December 2017, and~~addition to the ~~terms are discussed in detail in Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 3: Acquisitions, Asset Sales, and Divestitures”~~$34.2 million of cash received at the time of the ~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for~~sale closing in April 2018. The Company expects to receive $0.7 million over the ~~year ended December 31, 2016. Other than~~remaining three months of 2018 from the revenue sharing agreement with ~~Westfield, divestitures are not current ongoing sources~~Anchor, a portion of ~~funds for~~which will be recorded as miscellaneous income related to the ~~Holding Company. After~~difference between the ~~December 2017 payment under~~cash received and the ~~revenue sharing agreement~~present value of the payment. The Company also incurred a tax liability of $12.7 million attributable to the transaction, which is ~~received in~~primarily the result of a book-to-tax basis difference associated with nondeductible goodwill.

On October 17, 2018, the Company announced an agreement to sell all of its current equity interest in BOS in a transaction that will ~~not~~result in BOS being majority owned by members of its management team for an upfront cash payment and a non-voting, revenue share participation interest in BOS. Completion of the transaction is subject to obtaining client consents, as well as satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The Company will receive ~~additional~~approximately $21 million of cash at closing and an eight year revenue share. The Company currently estimates that the financial impact of the transaction will result in a pre-tax gain of approximately $18 million and a related tax expense of approximately $3 million to $4 million. The net ~~income from Westfield.~~ financial impact will increase Tier 1 Common Equity by approximately $33 million. The financial impact will be recorded at the time of closing, which is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Dividends from the Bank are limited by various regulatory requirements relating to capital adequacy and retained earnings. See Part II. Item 5. “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters, and Issuers Purchases of Equity Securities” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 for further details.

The Bank pays dividends to the Holding Company, subject to the approval of the Bank’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors,~~Directors, depending on its profitability and asset growth. If regulatory agencies were to require banks to increase their capital ratios, or impose other restrictions, it may limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Holding Company and/or limit the amount that the Bank could grow.

Although the Bank’s capital currently exceeds regulatory requirements for capital, the Holding Company could downstream additional capital to increase the rate that the Bank could grow. Depending upon the amount of capital downstreamed by the Holding Company, the approval of the Holding Company’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors may be required prior to the payment, if any.

The Company is required to pay interest quarterly on its junior subordinated debentures. The estimated cash outlay for the remaining three months of ~~2017~~2018 for the interest payments is approximately ~~$1.6~~$1.0 million based on the debt outstanding at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and estimated ~~LIBOR.~~London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). LIBOR is expected to be phased out as an index by the end of 2021 and the Company is currently evaluating alternatives to the LIBOR index.

The Company presently plans to pay cash dividends on its common stock on a quarterly basis dependent upon a number of factors such as profitability, Holding Company liquidity, and the Company’s capital levels. However, the ultimate declaration of dividends by the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors of the Company will depend on consideration of, among other things, recent financial trends and internal forecasts, regulatory limitations, alternative uses of capital deployment, general economic conditions, and regulatory changes to capital requirements. Additionally, the Company is required to inform and consult with the Federal Reserve in advance of declaring a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the dividend is being paid. Based on the current quarterly dividend rate of ~~$0.11~~$0.12 per share, as announced by the Company on January ~~18, 2017,~~17, 2018, and estimated shares outstanding, the Company estimates that the amount to be paid out for dividends to common shareholders in the remaining three months of ~~2017~~2018 will be approximately ~~$9.1~~$10.1 million. The estimated dividend payments in ~~2017~~2018 could increase or decrease if the Company’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors votes to increase or decrease, respectively, the current dividend rate, and/or the number of shares outstanding changes significantly.

~~Based~~On June 15, 2018, the Company redeemed all $50 million of the outstanding Series D preferred stock. There will therefore be no additional outlay for cash dividends on the ~~shares of stock outstanding of 6.95% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,~~ Series D ~~and the dividend rate, the Company expects to pay $0.9 million in cash dividends on~~ preferred stock for the remaining three months of ~~2017. Although the rate of interest is set in the terms of the preferred stock, the quarterly preferred stock dividend payments are subject to approval by the Company’s board of directors.~~2018.

In the first quarter of ~~2016,~~2018, the Company’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors approved, and the Company received regulatory non-objection for, a share repurchase program of up to ~~$20~~$20.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Under the program, shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market for a two-year period. As of September 30, ~~2017, there~~2018, $18.1 million remains ~~$10.7 million~~ available ~~to be repurchased.~~for repurchase. The amount and timing of ~~additional~~ repurchases ~~if any,~~ will be based on the Company’s continuous evaluation of the program.

Bank Liquidity. The Bank has established various borrowing arrangements to provide additional sources of liquidity and funding. Management believes that the Bank currently has adequate liquidity available to respond to current demands. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Boston, and as such, has access to short- and long-term borrowings from that institution. The FHLB can change the advance amounts that banks can utilize based on a bank’s current financial condition as obtained from publicly available data such as FDIC Call Reports. Decreases in the amount of FHLB borrowings available to the Bank would lower its liquidity and possibly limit the Bank’s ability to grow in the short-term. Management believes that the Bank has adequate liquidity to meet its commitments for the foreseeable future.

In addition to the above liquidity, the Bank has access to the ~~Federal Reserve~~FRB discount window facility, which can provide short-term liquidity as “lender of last resort,” brokered deposits, and federal funds lines. The use of non-core funding sources, including brokered deposits and borrowings, by the Bank may be limited by regulatory agencies. Generally, the regulatory agencies prefer that banks rely on core-funding sources for liquidity.

From time to time, the Bank purchases federal funds from the FHLB and other banking institutions to supplement its liquidity position. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank had unused federal fund lines of credit totaling $495.0 million, compared to $435.0 million at December 31, 2017, with correspondent institutions to provide it with immediate access to overnight ~~borrowings, compared to $485.0 million at December 31, 2016.~~borrowings. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank had ~~$70.0~~$20.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the federal fund lines with these correspondent institutions ~~and~~along with an additional $100.0 million of outstanding borrowings under federal fund lines with the FHLB. The Bank had ~~$80.0~~$30.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the federal fund lines at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Certain liquidity sources, such as federal funds lines, may be withdrawn by the correspondent bank at any time especially in the event of financial deterioration of the institution.

The Bank has ~~also~~ negotiated brokered deposit agreements with several institutions that have nationwide distribution capabilities. The Bank participates in deposit placement services that can be used to provide customers to expanded deposit insurance coverage. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank had ~~$562.5~~$860.1 million of brokered deposits outstanding under these agreements, compared to ~~$738.3~~$780.2 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

If the Bank is no longer able to utilize the FHLB for borrowing, collateral currently used for FHLB borrowings could be transferred to other facilities such as the ~~Federal Reserve’s~~FRB’s discount window. In addition, the Bank could increase its usage of brokered deposits. Other borrowing arrangements may have higher rates than the FHLB would typically charge.

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$815.1~~$738.0 million, compared to ~~$768.5~~$785.9 million at December 31, ~~2016, an increase~~2017, a decrease of ~~$46.6 million, or 6%.~~$47.9 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in shareholders’ equity was primarily the result of ~~net income,~~the redemption of the Series D preferred stock, dividends paid, and the change in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), ~~amortization of stock compensation, and the conversion of stock warrants,~~ partially offset by ~~dividends paid.~~net income.

The Company currently has one class of warrants to purchase common stock outstanding. These warrants were initially issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “TARP warrants”). As of September 30, ~~2017, 1,832,755~~2018, 1.0 million TARP warrants at a strike price of $8.00 per share were outstanding, before adjusting for dividends paid on the Company’s common stock in excess of $0.01 per share. The TARP warrants expire in November 2018.

~~As a bank holding company,~~ The Company expects all of the ~~Company~~TARP warrants to be exercised between now and the expiration date, as they are currently in-the-money. The number of shares of common stock to be issued, and the amount of cash to be received, from the exercise of the TARP warrants is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effectdependent upon the price of the Company’s common stock on the ~~Company’s financial statements. For example, under capital adequacy guidelines~~date of exercise and whether the holder of the warrants being exercised elects a cash or cashless exercise.

The Company and the ~~regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the~~ Bank which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory guidelines. The Bank’s capital and classifications are ~~also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.~~

~~Similarly, the Company is also~~ subject to capital ~~requirements administered~~rules issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ~~with respect to certain non-banking activities, including adjustments in connection with off-balance sheet items.~~

~~Effective January 1, 2015,~~System (the “Federal Reserve”). Under these rules, the Company and the Bank ~~adopted the BASEL III regulatory~~are each required to maintain a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ~~framework. Under BASEL III,~~to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5%, a minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6.0%, a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0%, and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. Additionally, subject to a transition schedule, these rules require the Company and the Bank ~~were required~~ to implement a new risk-weighted capital measure, common equity tier 1 (“CETI”), as well as a phased in capital conservation buffer. In addition, capital requirements for all banking organizations were increased. In order to avoid limitations on distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers,establish a capital conservation buffer ~~must be held~~of common equity Tier 1 capital in an amount above the minimum risk-based capital ~~requirements. The new rules are phased-in through 2019. The Bank~~requirements for “adequately capitalized” institutions equal to 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets, or face restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, pay discretionary bonuses, and ~~Company were~~to engage in ~~compliance with all of the requirements of the capital conservation buffer~~share repurchases.

A Federal Reserve-supervised institution, such as ~~of September 30, 2017.~~

~~To be categorized as “well capitalized,” the Company and~~ the Bank, ~~must maintain specified minimum~~is considered “well capitalized” if it (i) has a total capital ~~ratios. In addition, the Company~~to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.0% or greater; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0% or greater; (iii) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio to risk-weighted assets of 6.5% or greater; (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater; and ~~the Bank cannot be~~ (iv) is not

subject to any written agreement, order, or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive to ~~be considered “well capitalized.” Both the Company~~meet and ~~the~~maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. The Bank ~~maintained capital at levels that would be~~is currently considered “well capitalized” ~~as of September 30, 2017~~ under ~~the applicable regulations.~~

As of September 30, 2017, quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy required us to maintain minimum ratios of CETI, Tier 1, and total capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined in the regulations).all regulatory definitions.

The following ~~tables present~~table presents the Company’s and the Bank’s ~~amounts of~~ regulatory capital and related ratios as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Also presented are the minimum requirements established by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC as of those dates for the Company and the Bank, respectively, to meet applicable capital requirements and the requirements of the FDIC as of those dates for the Bank to be considered “well capitalized” under ~~the FDIC’s prompt corrective action provisions. On July 28, 2017, Boston Private Bank became a member of the Federal Reserve System.~~all regulatory definitions. The Federal Reserve and the Massachusetts Division of Banks may impose higher capital ratios than those listed below based upon the results of regulatory exams. ~~The Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action provisions as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.~~


	Actual				For capital adequacy purposes (at least)				To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions (at least)				Basel III minimum capital ratio with capital conservation buffer (1)		Actual				For capital adequacy purposes (at least)				To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions (at least)			Minimum capital ratio with capital conservation buffer (1)
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio	Ratio
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
As of September 30, 2017
As of September 30, 2018
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital
Company	$	607,822	10.42	%	$	262,420	4.5	%	n/a		n/a		7.0	%	$	674,641	11.14	%	$	272,565	4.5	%	n/a		n/a	7.0%
Boston Private Bank	695,945		11.98		261,314		4.5		$	377,453	6.5	%	7.0		730,926		12.11		271,652		4.5		$	392,386	6.5%	7.0
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Company	757,505		12.99		349,893		6.0		n/a		n/a		8.5		776,328		12.82		363,420		6.0		n/a		n/a	8.5
Boston Private Bank	695,945		11.98		348,418		6.0		464,558		8.0		8.5		730,926		12.11		362,202		6.0		482,936		8.0	8.5
Total risk-based capital
Company	830,719		14.25		466,525		8.0		n/a		n/a		10.5		851,399		14.06		484,560		8.0		n/a		n/a	10.5
Boston Private Bank	768,577		13.24		464,558		8.0		580,697		10.0		10.5		805,764		13.35		482,936		8.0		603,670		10.0	10.5
Tier 1 leverage capital
Company	757,505		9.42		321,760		4.0		n/a		n/a		4.0		776,328		9.20		242,280		4.0		n/a		n/a	4.0
Boston Private Bank	695,945		8.71		319,778		4.0		399,722		5.0		4.0		730,926		8.71		335,730		4.0		419,662		5.0	4.0

As of December 31, 2017
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital
Company															$	607,800	10.32	%	$	265,153	4.5	%	n/a		n/a	7.0%
Boston Private Bank															694,201		11.83		264,028		4.5		$	381,373	6.5%	7.0
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Company															758,089		12.87		353,537		6.0		n/a		n/a	8.5
Boston Private Bank															694,201		11.83		352,037		6.0		469,382		8.0	8.5
Total risk-based capital
Company															832,182		14.12		471,383		8.0		n/a		n/a	10.5
Boston Private Bank															767,576		13.08		469,382		8.0		586,728		10.0	10.5
Tier 1 leverage capital
Company															758,089		9.34		324,725		4.0		n/a		n/a	4.0
Boston Private Bank															694,201		8.63		321,920		4.0		402,400		5.0	4.0

Actual For capital adequacy purposes (at least) To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions (at least) Basel III minimum capital ratio with capital conservation buffer (1)
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Ratio
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2016
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital
Company $ 571,663
10.00 % $ 257,222
4.5 % n/a
n/a 7.0%
Boston Private Bank 661,991
11.64
256,030
4.5
$ 369,822
6.5 % 7.0
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Company 722,674
12.64
342,962
6.0
n/a
n/a 8.5
Boston Private Bank 661,991
11.64
341,374
6.0
455,165
8.0
8.5
Total risk-based capital
Company 794,584
13.90
457,283
8.0
n/a
n/a 10.5
Boston Private Bank 733,214
12.89
455,165
8.0
568,956
10.0
10.5
Tier 1 leverage capital
Company 722,674
9.42
306,848
4.0
n/a
n/a 4.0
Boston Private Bank 661,991
8.70
304,510
4.0
380,637
5.0
4.0

~~_____________________~~

~~n/a not applicable~~____________________


(1)	Required capital ratios ~~under the Basel III capital rules~~ with the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer added to the minimum risk-based capital ratios. The fully phased-in ratios are effective for 2019, with lower requirements during the transition years 2016 through 2018.

Bank regulatory authorities restrict the Bank from lending or advancing funds to, or investing in the securities of, the Company. Further, these authorities restrict the amounts available for the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Company.

The Company has sponsored the creation of two statutory trusts for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds in junior subordinated debentures of the Company. In accordance with ASC 810-10-55, Consolidation - Overall - Implementation Guidance and Illustrations - Variable Interest Entities, these statutory trusts created by the Company are not consolidated into the Company’s financial statements; however, the Company reflects the amounts of

junior subordinated debentures payable to the preferred stockholders of statutory trusts as debt in its financial statements. As of both September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, all $100.0 million of the net balance of these trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Part I. Item 1. “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note ~~13:~~14: Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for a description of upcoming changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States that may impact the Company.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in the Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk as described in Part II. Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, the Company has evaluated, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this

report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company and its management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Based on such evaluation, ~~except for the exclusion noted in the preceding paragraph,~~ the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed by the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to the certifying officers by others within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the disclosure controls and procedures, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company’s systems evolve with its business.

(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Before deciding to invest in us or deciding to maintain or increase your investment, you should carefully consider the risks described in Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 as filed with the SEC. There have been no material changes to these risk factors since the filing of that ~~report, except as discussed in the following paragraphs.~~

~~The Company is amending one of the risk factors in its Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect the fact that, on July 28, 2017, the Bank became a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.~~

~~Our banking business is highly regulated, which could limit or restrict our activities, and changes in banking laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.~~

We are subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve, and the Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Commissioner and the Federal Reserve. Federal and state laws and regulations govern numerous matters affecting us, including changes in the ownership or control of banks and bank holding companies; maintenance of adequate capital and the financial condition of a financial institution; permissible types, amounts and terms of extensions of credit and investments; permissible non-banking activities; the level of reserves against deposits and restrictions on dividend payments. The Federal Reserve and the Commissioner have the power to issue cease and desist orders to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law by banks subject to their regulation, and the Federal Reserve possesses similar powers with respect to bank holding companies. These and other restrictions limit the manner in which we and the Bank may conduct business and obtain financing.

The laws, rules, regulations and supervisory guidance and policies applicable to us are subject to regular modification and change. These changes could adversely and materially impact us. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, including costs of compliance, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer, and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, policies, or supervisory guidance could result in enforcement and other legal actions by federal or state authorities, including criminal and civil penalties, the loss of FDIC insurance, revocation of a banking charter, other sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties, and/or reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities of the Company in the third quarter of ~~2017.~~2018.

The following table summarizes repurchases of the Company’s outstanding common shares in the third quarter of 2018.



	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	(a) Total number of shares purchased	(b) Average price paid per share		(c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans	(d) Maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans
July 1 - 31, 2018	—	$	—	—	$	20,000,000
August 1 - 31, 2018	62,423	13.94		62,423	19,129,812
September 1 - 30, 2018	74,691	13.86		137,114	18,094,919
Total	137,114	$	13.89	137,114	$	18,094,919

On March 28, 2018, the Company received a notice of non-objection from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston for a share repurchase program of up to $20 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Under the program, shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market in amounts and at prices the Company deems appropriate, subject to market conditions and other considerations, for a two-year period. The program does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. The repurchases will be funded from cash on hand, proceeds from potential debt or other capital markets sources. The share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. The Company’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors approved the program, subject to regulatory non-objection, on ~~January 27, 2016. There were no repurchases of equity securities of the Company in the third quarter of 2017.~~ February 26, 2018.

The ~~Company has authorization to~~Company’s previous share repurchase ~~$10,661,737 of shares based~~program expired on ~~the remaining amount in the current repurchase program.~~

February 28, 2018.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

~~None.~~As previously disclosed, George G. Schwartz will retire from his position as President of the Bank. Upon departing his position, Mr. Schwartz will receive the severance benefits set forth in the Executive Vice President Severance Pay Plan.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated by Reference			Filed or Furnished with this 10-Q
Exhibit No.	Description	Form	SEC Filing Date	Exhibit Number	Filed or Furnished with this 10-Q
~~10.1~~	~~Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan~~				~~Filed~~
~~10.2~~	~~Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan~~				~~Filed~~
~~10.3~~	~~Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan~~				~~Filed~~
~~10.4~~	~~Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan~~				~~Filed~~
~~10.5~~	~~Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. 2010 Inducement Stock Plan, as Amended~~				~~Filed~~
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				Filed
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				Filed
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Furnished
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Furnished
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document				Filed
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document				Filed
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document				Filed
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document				Filed
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document				Filed
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document				Filed

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

	/s/ CLAYTON G. DEUTSCH
November ~~7, 2017~~5, 2018	Clayton G. Deutsch
	Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ DS~~AVID~~TEVEN ~~J. K~~M. G~~AYE~~AVEN
November ~~7, 2017~~5, 2018	~~David J. Kaye~~Steven M. Gaven
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial ~~and Administrative~~ Officer

7279



	As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2016
	Restructured in the current quarter					TDRs that defaulted that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—		—	—
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		1	1,276
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential	—	—		—		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	—	$	—	$	—	1	$	1,276



	As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
	Restructured in the current year to date					TDRs that defaulted that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	3	$	7,384	$	7,209	—	$	—
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—		—	—
Commercial real estate	1	1,276		1,276		1	1,276
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential	2	260		261		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	6	$	8,920	$	8,746	1	$	1,276



	As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
	Extension of term			Temporary rate reduction			Payment deferral			Combination of concessions (1)			Total concessions
	# of Loans	Post- modifi- cation recorded invest- ment		# of Loans	Post- modifi- cation recorded invest- ment		# of Loans	Post- modifi- cation recorded invest- ment		# of Loans	Post- modifi- cation recorded invest- ment		# of Loans	Post- modifi- cation recorded invest- ment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	2	$	7,209	—	$	—	—	$	—	1	$	—	3	$	7,209
Commercial tax exempt	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—
Commercial real estate	—	—		—	—		—	—		1	1,276		1	1,276
Construction and land	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—
Residential	—	—		2	261		—	—		—	—		2	261
Home equity	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o