Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
  
 
FORM 10-Q
  
(Mark One)
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: NovemberAugust 1, 20142015
OR
 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-21296
  
 PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  
California95-3759463
(State of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
3450 East Miraloma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(714) 414-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number)
  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large Accelerated Filer¨Accelerated Filerý
Non-Accelerated Filer¨Smaller Reporting Company¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
On December 3, 2014,September 8, 2015, the registrant had 69,264,21470,079,068 shares of Common Stock outstanding.


Table of Contents

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended NovemberAugust 1, 20142015
Index
 
 Page
 
  
 
  
 
  
EX-31.1 
EX-32.1 
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT 
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT 
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101 LABEL LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 

2

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

November 1, 2014 February 1, 2014August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:      
Cash and cash equivalents$12,279
 $27,769
$13,697
 $22,588
Inventories129,157
 83,073
128,565
 81,658
Prepaid expenses15,872
 13,404
13,488
 12,692
Other current assets6,072
 6,089
5,669
 3,992
Total current assets163,380
 130,335
161,419
 120,930
Property and equipment, net91,485
 96,797
86,989
 88,751
Deferred income taxes6,175
 6,175
6,034
 6,034
Intangible assets, net10,642
 12,968
10,742
 11,069
Other assets25,877
 26,364
24,694
 25,495
TOTAL ASSETS$297,559
 $272,639
$289,878
 $252,279
      
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICITLIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:      
Accounts payable$81,637
 $46,034
$90,966
 $36,775
Derivative liability14,180
 30,720
3,650
 28,448
Other current liabilities44,783
 37,286
49,500
 48,183
Total current liabilities140,600
 114,040
144,116
 113,406
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:      
Deferred lease incentives11,590
 12,889
12,950
 10,804
Deferred rent14,927
 15,440
14,541
 14,694
Long-term debt88,474
 86,075
96,148
 94,424
Other liabilities25,808
 26,046
25,527
 28,368
Total long-term liabilities140,799
 140,450
149,166
 148,290
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
 

 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:   
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,859,375 shares authorized; 69,242,483 and 68,591,818 shares issued and outstanding, respectively692
 686
SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:   
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,859,375 shares authorized; 70,075,507 and 69,265,844 shares issued and outstanding, respectively701
 693
Additional paid-in capital23,972
 22,602
25,542
 24,384
Accumulated deficit(8,504) (5,139)(29,647) (34,494)
Total shareholders’ equity16,160
 18,149
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$297,559
 $272,639
Total shareholders’ deficit(3,404) (9,417)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT$289,878
 $252,279


See accompanying footnotes.Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

 
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

For the Third Quarter Ended For the Three Quarters EndedFor the Second Quarter Ended For the First Half Ended
November 1, 2014
November 2, 2013 November 1, 2014
November 2, 2013August 1, 2015
August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015
August 2, 2014
Net sales$212,292
 $202,795
 $595,184
 $579,201
$195,622
 $211,749
 $362,125
 $382,892
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs155,609
 151,622
 432,299
 423,661
145,139
 150,210
 266,997
 276,690
Gross margin56,683
 51,173
 162,885
 155,540
50,483
 61,539
 95,128
 106,202
Selling, general and administrative expenses58,020
 52,968
 170,609
 162,418
53,857
 60,563
 105,998
 112,589
Operating loss(1,337) (1,795) (7,724) (6,878)
(Gain) loss on derivative liability(4,881) (23,444) (16,540) 7,000
Operating income (loss)(3,374) 976
 (10,870) (6,387)
Gain on derivative liability(15,717) (10,434) (24,798) (11,659)
Interest expense, net3,867
 3,565
 11,819
 10,551
4,281
 4,075
 8,425
 7,952
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes(323) 18,084
 (3,003) (24,429)
Income tax expense146
 369
 362
 514
(Loss) income from continuing operations(469) 17,715
 (3,365) (24,943)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax effects
 (473) 
 (1,241)
Net (loss) income$(469) $17,242
 $(3,365) $(26,184)
Comprehensive (loss) income$(469) $17,242
 $(3,365) $(26,184)
Income (loss) before income taxes8,062
 7,335
 5,503
 (2,680)
Income tax (benefit) expense(275) (166) 656
 216
Net income (loss)$8,337
 $7,501
 $4,847
 $(2,896)
Comprehensive income (loss)$8,337
 $7,501
 $4,847
 $(2,896)
              
(Loss) income from continuing operations per share:       
Basic$(0.01) $0.26
 $(0.05) $(0.36)
Diluted$(0.01) $0.24
 $(0.05) $(0.36)
Loss from discontinued operations per share:       
Basic$0.00
 $(0.01) $0.00
 $(0.02)
Diluted$0.00
 $(0.01) $0.00
 $(0.02)
Net (loss) income per share:       
Net income (loss) per share:       
Basic$(0.01) $0.25
 $(0.05) $(0.38)$0.12
 $0.11
 $0.07
 $(0.04)
Diluted$(0.01) $0.23
 $(0.05) $(0.38)$0.12
 $0.10
 $0.07
 $(0.04)
Weighted-average shares outstanding:              
Basic69,235,168
 68,567,973
 69,018,319
 68,424,615
69,819,615
 69,069,770
 69,625,420
 68,989,675
Diluted69,235,168
 75,515,120
 69,018,319
 68,424,615
69,894,694
 73,197,282
 71,847,929
 68,989,675
       


See accompanying footnotes.Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents


PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands)

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, All Amounts in Thousands)
For the Three Quarters EndedFor the First Half Ended
November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss$(3,365) $(26,184)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:   
Net income (loss)$4,847
 $(2,896)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization18,060
 19,443
10,353
 12,092
Asset impairment3,119
 2,031
602
 1,663
Loss on disposal of property and equipment122
 60
47
 106
(Gain) loss on derivative liability(16,540) 7,000
Gain on derivative liability(24,798) (11,659)
Amortization of debt discount2,239
 1,611
2,005
 1,482
Non-cash stock-based compensation1,202
 2,200
1,414
 837
Change in assets and liabilities:  
  
Inventories(46,084) (46,361)(46,907) (47,865)
Other current assets(2,451) (5,000)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(2,473) (4,193)
Other assets(1,600) 1,115
336
 (575)
Accounts payable35,603
 27,813
54,191
 46,111
Other current liabilities7,130
 (2,352)(5,381) 6,923
Deferred lease incentives(1,299) (2,084)2,146
 (349)
Deferred rent(513) (406)(153) (481)
Other long-term liabilities97
 4
(2,322) (91)
Net cash used in operating activities(4,280) (21,110)
CASH FLOWS USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES:   
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(6,093) 1,105
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:   
Purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets(11,320) (7,160)(6,762) (7,919)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:      
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings15,000
 
Payments under credit facility borrowings(10,000) 
Proceeds from mortgage borrowings618
 

 618
Principal payments under mortgage borrowings(422) (429)(267) (293)
Payments for debt issuance costs(116) 

 (116)
Principal payments under capital lease obligations(344) (347)(520) (222)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options374
 240
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities110
 (536)
Proceeds from issuance of stock-based compensation302
 373
Statutory withholding payments for stock-based compensation(551) 
Net cash provided by financing activities3,964
 360
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS(15,490) (28,806)(8,891) (6,454)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period27,769
 48,733
22,588
 27,769
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period$12,279
 $19,927
$13,697
 $21,315
   
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Cash paid for interest$4,656
 $4,179
$2,938
 $3,105
Cash paid for income taxes$874
 $601
$277
 $834
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:  
  
Property and equipment purchases accrued at end of period$975
 $1,229
Property, equipment and intangible asset purchases accrued at end of period$2,162
 $1,776

See accompanying footnotes.Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the “Company” or “PacSun”) is a leading specialty retailer rooted in the action sports, fashion and music influences of the California lifestyle. The Company sells a combination of branded and proprietary casual apparel, accessories and footwear designed to appeal to teens and young adults. It operates a nationwide, primarily mall-based chain of retail stores under the names “Pacific Sunwear” and “PacSun.” In addition, the Company operates an e-commerce website at www.pacsun.com which sells PacSun merchandise online, provides content and community for its target customers and provides information about the Company. The Company, a California corporation, was incorporated in August 1982. As of NovemberAugust 1, 20142015, the Company leased and operated 620608 stores in each of the 50 states and Puerto Rico.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnotenote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted.
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014January 31, 2015 (“fiscal 2013”2014”) filed with the SEC. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., a California corporation (“PacSun Stores”) and Miraloma Borrower Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Miraloma”)). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring entries necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended and first three quartershalf ended NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 201530, 2016 (“fiscal 2014”2015”).
The results of continuing operations for all periods presented in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements exclude the financial impact of discontinued operations. See Note 13, “Discontinued Operations” for further discussion related to discontinued operations presentation.
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Information regarding significant accounting policies is contained in Note 1, “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2013.2014 (the "Report"). Presented below in the following notes is supplemental information that should be read in conjunction with “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in thatthe Report.
Income Taxes
The Company calculates its interim income tax provision in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 270, “Interim Reporting” (“ASC 270”) and ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). At the end of each interim period, the Company estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies that rate to its ordinary quarterly earnings. The tax expense or benefit related to significant, unusual, or extraordinary items is recognized in the interim period in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the interim period in which the change occurs. The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires certain estimates and significant judgment including the expected operating income for the year, permanent and temporary differences as a result of differences between amounts measured and recognized in accordance with tax laws and financial accounting standards, and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets generated in the current fiscal year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.

6

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for the incremental shares attributed to outstanding options to purchase common stock and nonvested restricted stock using the treasury stock method, if dilutive. In periods where a net loss is reported, incremental shares are excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive. In such circumstances, the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the basic and diluted earnings per common share calculations will be the same.

6

Table of Contents

Anti-dilutive options and nonvested shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because either the option exercise price or the grant date fair value of the nonvested share is greater than the market price of the Company’s common stock. Options to purchase 1.3 million shares of common stock in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, and 4.2 million and 6.65.2 million shares of common stock in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
The table below sets forth the reconciliation of the denominator of each net (loss) income per share calculation for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal years 2014 and 2013:
 For the Third Quarter Ended For the Three Quarters Ended
 (in thousands)
 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013
Shares used in computing basic net (loss) income per share69,235 68,568 69,018 68,425
Dilutive effect of options, restricted stock and convertible preferred stock
 6,947
 
 
Shares used in computing diluted net (loss) income per share69,235 75,515 69,018 68,425
 For the Second Quarter Ended For the First Half Ended
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
 (in thousands)
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share69,820
 69,070
 69,625
 68,990
Dilutive effect of options, restricted stock and convertible preferred stock75
 4,127
 2,223
 
Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share69,895
 73,197
 71,848
 68,990
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern" ("ASU 2014-15"). This ASU sets forth guidance regarding management’s responsibility to (1) evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern, and (2) provide related footnote disclosures. ASU 2014-15 requires management to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that currently exist in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, this update provided a definition of the term “substantial doubt,” and added new Subtopic 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern, which (1) requires an evaluation every reporting period, including interim periods, (2) sets forth principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (3) mandates certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of the consideration of management’s plans, (4) mandates an express statement, and other disclosures, when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (5) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption of this ASU is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014,April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts2015-03, "Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with Customers" ("ASU 2014-09").debt discounts. The ASU amended revenue recognition and measurement guidance to clarifyfor debt issuance costs are not affected by the principles for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers.amendments in this ASU. The new standard is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled to when products are transferred to customers. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-09effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted.2015. The new revenue accounting standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. Based on the Company's evaluation of the ASU, its adoption of this updateguidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.position.

In April 2014,June 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, "2015-15, "Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Financial StatementsDebt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements", which permits an entity to defer and Property, Plant,present debt issuance costs as an asset and Equipment" and "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity" ("ASU 2014-08"). The ASU amendment changessubsequently amortize the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20. The amendment is effective on a prospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted ASU 2014-08 asdeferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the beginningline-of-credit arrangement, regardless of its fourth fiscal quarter of 2014. Basedwhether there are any outstanding borrowings on the Company's evaluation of the ASU, the adoption of this ASUline-of-credit arrangement. The new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.position.

7

Table of Contents

4. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets (or asset group) may not be recoverable. Based on management’s review of the historical operating performance, including sales trends, gross margin rates, current cash flows from operations and the projected outlook for each of the Company’s stores, the Company determined that certain stores would not be able to generate sufficient cash flows over the remaining term of the related leases to recover the Company’s investment in the respective stores. As a result, the Company recorded the following non-cash impairment charges related to its retail stores within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Operations, to write-down the carrying value of its long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values.
 For the Third Quarter Ended For the Three Quarters Ended
 (In thousands)
 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013
Impairment charges from continuing operations$377
 $600
 $2,040
 $2,031
 For the Second Quarter Ended For the First Half Ended
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
 (In thousands)
Impairment charges$61
 $880
 $602
 $1,663
 
November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Carrying value of assets tested for impairment$1,466
 $3,803
$825
 $2,341
Carrying value of assets with impairment$558
 $822
$89
 $1,198
Fair value of assets impaired$181
 $222
$28
 $318
Number of stores tested for impairment48
 57
20
 47
Number of stores with impairment12
 8
4
 17
The long-lived assets disclosed above that were written down to their respective fair values consisted primarily of leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment. The Company recognized impairment charges of $0.4$0.1 million and $0.6$0.9 million,, respectively, during the thirdsecond quarters ended NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 and NovemberAugust 2, 20132014 and $2.0$0.6 million and $1.7 million during each of the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. The decrease in the number of stores tested for impairment year-over-year was primarily related to the Company’sCompany's closure of certain under-performing stores and the improved financial performanceunderperforming stores.

7

Table of the remaining store base. Based on historical operating performance and the projected outlook for a subset of the stores tested for impairment as of November 1, 2014, the Company believes that the remaining asset value of approximately $0.2 million is recoverable. In addition, during the third quarter of 2014, the Company determined that certain software previously capitalized for internal use was abandoned. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.1 million and accrued approximately $0.4 million related to future software maintenance costs.Contents

See Note 10, "Fair Value Measurements" for further discussion related to impairment of long-lived assets.
5. DERIVATIVE LIABILTY
As disclosed in Note 9, "Shareholders' Equity," the Company issued 1,000 shares of its Convertible Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred”) in connection with the 5-year, $60 million senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan”), funded by an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital. The fair value of the Series B Preferred at issuance was approximately $15$15 million which was recorded as a derivative liability. As of NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 and February 1, 2014,January 31, 2015, the fair value of the derivative liability was approximately $14$3.7 million and $31$28.4 million,, respectively. See Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements” for further discussion on the derivative liability.
6. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities consisted of the following:
November 1, 2014 February 1, 2014August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Accrued compensation and benefits$10,995
 $7,858
$8,930
 $12,528
Accrued gift cards6,066
 9,036
6,707
 8,905
Credit facility borrowings5,000
 
Sales taxes payable2,187
 1,549
3,234
 3,720
Other25,535
 18,843
25,629
 23,030
Total other current liabilities$44,783
 $37,286
$49,500
 $48,183

8

Table of Contents

7. DEBT
Credit Facility
On December 7, 2011, the Company entered into a new five-year, $1005-year, $100 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A (the “Wells Credit Facility”), which replaced the Company’s previous revolving credit facility with JPMorgan Chase (the “Former Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Wells Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate (as defined in the Wells Credit Facility, 1.91%1.94% as of NovemberAugust 1, 2014)2015) which, at the Company’s option, may be determined by reference to a LIBOR Rate or a Base Rate. Extensions of credit under the Wells Credit Facility are limited to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages of eligible categories of assets. The Wells Credit Facility is available for direct borrowings and allows for the issuance of letters of credit, and up to $12.5 million is available for swing-line loans. The Wells Credit Facility is secured by liens and security interests with (a) a first priority security interest in the current and certain related assets of the Company including cash, cash equivalents, deposit accounts, securities accounts, credit card receivables and inventory, and (b) a second priority security interest in all assets and properties of the Company that are not secured by a first lien and security interest. The Wells Credit Facility also contains covenants that, subject to specified exceptions, restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, liquidate or dissolve, sell, transfer, lease or dispose of assets, or make loans, investments or guarantees. The Wells Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on December 7, 2016. At NovemberAs of August 1, 2014,2015, the Company had no$5.0 million of direct borrowings and $9$7.7 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Wells Credit Facility. The remaining availability under the Wells Credit Facility at NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 was approximately $49$70.6 million.
Consistent with its previous expectations, inDuring the fourththird quarter of fiscal 20142015, the Company borrowed $15an additional $10 million on the Wells Fargo Credit Facility primarily to financefund inventory purchases for the holiday season. The Company expects to repay such borrowings prior to the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.peak back-to-school selling season, and subsequently repaid $10 million. The Company is not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the Wells Credit Facility. Although the Company made progress with respect to its comparable store net sales and gross margins in fiscal 2014, the Company experienced declines in comparable store sales and gross margins in the first half of fiscal 2015. If the Company were to continue to experience a decline in same-store sales and gross margins in the future, the Company may be required to access most, if not all, of the Wells Credit Facility and would potentially require other sources of financing to fund the Company's operations, which sources might not be available. Based on current forecasts, the Company believes that its cash flows from operations and working capital, along with the availability under the Wells Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet itsthe Company's operating and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months.
Term Loan
On December 7, 2011, the Company obtained the Term Loan funded by an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital. The Term Loan bears interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum to be paid in cash, due and payable quarterly in arrears, and 7.50% per annum, due and payable in kind (“PIK”) annually in arrears, with such PIK interest then due and payable being added to the outstanding principal balance of the Term Loan at the end of each fiscal year, and with adjustments to the cash and PIK portion of the interest rate in accordance with the Term Loan agreement, following principal prepayments. Annual cash interest for fiscal 20142015 is expected to be approximately $4 million.$4 million. The Term Loan is guaranteed by each of the Company’s subsidiaries and will be guaranteed by any future

8

Table of Contents

domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The Term Loan is secured by liens and security interests with (a) a first priority security interest in all long-term assets of the Company and PacSun Stores and all other assets not subject to a first lien and security interest pursuant to the Wells Credit Facility, (b) a first priority pledge of the equity interests of Miraloma and (c) a second priority security interest in all assets of the Company and PacSun Stores subject to a first lien and security interest pursuant to the Wells Credit Facility. The Term Loan also contains covenants substantially identical to those in the Wells Credit Facility. The principal balance and any unpaid interest related to the Term Loan is due on December 7, 2016. The Company is not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the Term Loan.
Mortgage Debt
On August 20, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Miraloma and PacSun Stores, executed two promissory notes pursuant to which borrowings in an aggregate amount of $29.8 million from American National Insurance Company (“Anico”ANICO”) were incurred. The principal and interest payments are based on a 25-year amortization schedule, with the remaining principal balances and any accrued and unpaid interest due on September 1, 2017.
The original note executed by Miraloma (the "Miraloma Note") is secured by a deed of trust on the building and land comprising the Company’s principal executive offices in Anaheim, California and is non-recourse to the Company. The Miraloma Note does not contain any financial covenants. In connection with this transaction, the Company transferred the building and related land securing the Miraloma Note to Miraloma and entered into a lease for the building and land with Miraloma. The original note executed by PacSun Stores (the "PacSun Stores Note") is secured by a mortgage on the Company’s leasehold interest in the building and land comprising the Company’s distribution center in Olathe, Kansas, and is unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The PacSun Stores Note does not contain any financial covenants.
On July 1, 2014, the Company modified certain terms associated with the Miraloma Note and the PacSun Stores Note. The note modification executed by Miraloma (the "New Miraloma Note”) (i) provided for an additional advance of $0.3 million to fund the payment of fees, commissions and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the New Miraloma Note, resulting in a new principal balance of $15.9 million; (ii) extended the maturity date of the Miraloma Note to July 1, 2021; (iii) reduced the interest rate to 5.25% per annum; and (iv) provided that the Miraloma Note may not be prepaid prior to July 1, 2017 and thereafter may be prepaid only upon payment of prepayment fees pursuant to a schedule set forth in the note modification.New Miraloma Note. The amended note executed by PacSun Stores

9

Table of Contents

(the (the "New PacSun Stores Note”) (i) provided for an additional advance of $0.2 million to fund the payment of fees, commissions and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the New PacSun Stores Note, resulting in a new principal balance of $12.3 million; (ii) extended the maturity date of the PacSun Stores Note to July 1, 2021; (iii) reduced the interest rate to 5.25% per annum; and (iv) provided that the PacSun Stores Note may not be prepaid prior to July 1, 2017 and thereafter may be prepaid only upon payment of prepayment fees pursuant to a schedule set forth in the note modification.New PacSun Stores Note.
As of NovemberAugust 1, 2014,2015, the remaining aggregate principal payments due under the Term Loan and the Mortgage Debt are as follows:
(In thousands)(In thousands)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total
Mortgage Debt$131
 $541
 $570
 $600
 $633
 $25,583
 $28,058
$555
 $585
 $616
 $649
 $684
 $24,572
 $27,661
Term Loan (1)

 
 70,293
 
 
 
 70,293

 75,623
 
 
 
 
 75,623
Total$131
 $541
 $70,863
 $600
 $633
 $25,583
 $98,351
$555
 $76,208
 $616
 $649
 $684
 $24,572
 $103,284
  Less: Term Loan discount (9,343)  Less: Term Loan discount (6,581)
  Less: current portion of long-term debt (534)  Less: Current portion of long-term debt (555)
  Total long-term debt $88,474
  Total long-term debt $96,148
(1(1) Upon maturity of the Term Loan, $26.6 million of PIK interest will become due and payable, of which $10.3$15.6 million is included in the Term Loan balance and $4.0$2.9 million is accrued and included in other current liabilities as of NovemberAugust 1, 2014.2015.
The Company recorded interest expense of $3.9$4.3 million and $3.6$4.1 million during the thirdsecond quarters of fiscal 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, and $11.8$8.4 million and $10.6$8.0 million in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively.

9

Table of Contents

8. INCOME TAXES
The provisions codified within ASC 740 require companies to assess whether valuation allowances should be established against their deferred tax assets based on consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. In accordance with ASC 740, a full valuation allowance was established during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and continues to be maintained on all federal and the majority of state deferred tax assets.assets. Remaining net state deferred tax assets of approximately $4$4 million were not reserved as the Company concluded it is more likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be utilized before expiration. The Company has discontinued recognizing federal and certain state income tax benefits until it is determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred income tax assets.
The Company continues to monitor whether an ownership change has occurred under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”). Based on available information at the reporting date, the Company believes it has not experienced an ownership change through the quarter ended NovemberAugust 1, 2014.2015. The determination of whether or not an ownership change under Section 382 has occurred requires the Company to evaluate certain acquisitions and dispositions of ownership interests over a rolling three-yearthree-year period. As a result, future acquisitions and dispositions could result in an ownership change of the Company under Section 382. If an ownership change were to occur, the Company’s ability to utilize federal net operating loss carryforwards could be significantly limited.
9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYDEFICIT
Preferred Stock
In conjunction with the Term Loan, the Company issued the Series B Preferred to an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital which, based on the initial conversion ratio, gives that affiliate the right to purchase up to 13.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The Series B Preferred shares have an exercise price initially equal to $1.75$1.75 per share of the Company’s underlying common stock. The initial holder of the Series B Preferred is entitled to customary registration rights with respect to the underlying common stock. See Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements – Measurements–Recurring Fair Value Measurements” for further discussion on the accounting treatment of the Series B Preferred.
Stock-Based Compensation
TheDuring the first half of fiscal 2015, the Company maintains twomaintained three stock-based incentive plans: (1) the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Performance"2005 Plan”), (2) the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2015 Plan") and (2)(3) the amended and restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”).
The types of awards that maycould be granted under the Performance2005 Plan includeincluded stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock or units of the Company’s common stock. Persons eligible to receive awards under the Performance2005 Plan included officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the Company and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The vesting of awards under the 2005 Plan was determined at the date of grant. Each award expires on a date determined at the date of grant; however, the maximum term of options and stock appreciation rights under the 2005 Plan is ten years after the grant date of the award. The 2005 Plan expired on March 22, 2015. Therefore, as of August 1, 2015, there were no remaining shares of the Company's common stock available for award grants under the 2005 Plan.
On March 19, 2015, the Board of Directors approved the 2015 Plan to replace the expiring 2005 Plan. On June 4, 2015, the 2015 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders. Initially, 7.0 million shares were available for grants under the 2015 Plan. The types of awards that can be granted under the 2015 Plan include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company's common stock or units of the Company's common stock. Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan include officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the Company and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The vesting of awards under the Performance2015 Plan isare determined

10

Table of Contents

at the date of grant. Each award expires on a date determined at the date of grant; however, the maximum term of options and stock appreciation rights under the Performance2015 Plan is ten years after the grant date of the award. As of November 1, 2014, the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that was available for award grants under the Performance Plan was 2.8 million shares. Any shares subject to awards under prior stock plans that are canceled, forfeited or otherwise terminate without having vested or been exercised, as applicable, will become available for future award grants under the Performance2015 Plan. The Performance Plan will terminate on March 22,As of August 1, 2015,, unless terminated earlier by there were 6.8 million shares of the Company’s Board of Directors.Company's common stock available for award grants under the 2015 Plan.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation expense in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation”. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of its stock options. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the compensation expense to be recognized during the vesting period. The expected term of options granted is derived primarily from historical data on employee exercises adjusted for expected changes to option terms, if any. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based primarily on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The Company records stock-based compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, which is generally three to four years.years. The Company’s stock-based awards generally begin vesting one year after the grant date and, for stock options, expire in seven to ten

10


years or three months after termination of employment with the Company. The Company’s stock-based compensation expense resulted from awards of stock options, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights, as well as from shares issued under the ESPP.
Stock Options
Under the Performance2005 Plan, incentive and nonqualified stock options have been granted to employees and directors to purchase common stock at prices equal to the fair value of the Company’s common shares at the respective grant dates. No stock options were granted by the Company during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 or fiscal 2013.2014 under either the 2005 Plan or the 2015 Plan. A summary of stock option (incentive and nonqualified) activity for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 is presented below:
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Yrs.)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000s)
Outstanding at February 1, 20142,209,379
 $5.11
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised
 
    
Forfeited or expired(280,214) 11.64
    
Outstanding at November 1, 20141,929,165
 $4.16
 2.0 $5
Vested and expected to vest at November 1, 20141,926,855
 $4.17
 2.0 $5
Exercisable at November 1, 20141,894,254
 $4.19
 2.0 $4

 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Yrs.)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000s)
Outstanding at January 31, 20151,913,227
 $4.11
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised
 
    
Forfeited or expired(75,925) 12.63
    
Outstanding at August 1, 20151,837,302
 $3.75
 1.3 $
Vested and expected to vest at August 1, 20151,836,958
 $3.76
 1.3 $
Exercisable at August 1, 20151,830,436
 $3.76
 1.3 $
There were no and 10,375 stock options exercised during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first three quarters of fiscal 2013 was immaterial.2015 or 2014.
Restricted Stock Awards
A summary of service-based restricted stock awards activity under the Performance2005 Plan for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 is presented in the following table. No restricted stock awards were granted under the 2015 Plan during the first half of fiscal 2015. Except as described below, such restricted stock awards contain a service-based restriction as to vesting. These awards generally vest over 4 years with 25% of the grantshares vesting each year on the anniversary of the grant date.
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at February 1, 20141,319,571
 $2.13
Outstanding at January 31, 2015964,001
 $1.99
Granted100,000
 2.51
2,750,000
 2.81
Vested(422,230) 2.31
(359,268) 2.16
Forfeited(139,483) 2.30
(25,749) 2.13
Outstanding at November 1, 2014857,858
 $2.06
Outstanding at August 1, 20153,328,984
 $2.65
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of service-based restricted stock awards granted during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $2.81 and 2013 was 2.51 and $2.53,$2.86, respectively. The total fair value of service-based restricted stock awards vested during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $1.0 million and 2013 was $1.2 million, and $1.5 million, respectively.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards
11

Table of Contents

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company granted 675,000 performance-based restricted stock awards under the 2005 Plan which only vest upon the achievement of certain financial targets. The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of performance-based restricted stock awards granted during fiscal 2012 was $1.77.$1.77. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, 200,000 shares with a fair value totaling $0.6 million vested as a result of the Company achieving certain financial targets in fiscal 2014. There were no performance-based restricted stock awards granted in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014.2015.

11

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Units
A summary of restricted stock units activity under the Performance2005 Plan and the 2015 Plan for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 is presented below. Restricted stock units contain a service-based restriction as to vesting. These awards generally vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date.
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at February 1, 2014122,480
 $3.47
Outstanding at January 31, 2015150,000
 $2.25
Granted150,000
 2.25
125,000
 1.42
Vested(122,480) 3.47
(150,000) 2.25
Forfeited
 

 
Outstanding at November 1, 2014150,000
 $2.25
Outstanding at August 1, 2015125,000
 $1.42
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of restricted stock awards units granted during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $1.42 and 2013 was 2.25 and $3.47,$2.25, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $0.2 million and 2013 was $0.3 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized related to nonvested stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units during the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $0.4$0.7 million and $0.5$0.3 million,, respectively, and during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $1.2$1.4 million and $2.2$0.8 million, respectively.
At NovemberAugust 1, 2014,2015, the Company had approximately $1.6$6.3 million of stock-based compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, service-based restricted stock awards, performance-based restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.73.2 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)
The Company’s ESPP provides a method for Company employees to voluntarily purchase Company common stock at a 10% discount from fair market value as of the beginning or the end of each annual purchasing period, whichever is lower. Historically, the Company's purchase period has been equal to six months; however, following the June 2013 ESPP purchase, the Company extended the purchase period to one year. The ESPP covers substantially all employees who have three months of service with the Company, excluding senior executives. The ESPP is intended to constitute an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. On March 20, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the ESPP to increase the number of authorized shares thereunder from 2.1 million shares to 2.5 million shares. Such amendment was approved by the shareholders at the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. Shares issued under the ESPP during the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were 294,743 and 2013 were 174,335, and 149,398, respectively.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis and measures its nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value as required or permitted.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received pursuant to the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. In order to determine the fair value of certain assets and liabilities, the Company applies the three-level hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflect the Company’s assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs) and requires the use of observable inputs if such data is available without undue cost and effort. The hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 — quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 — inputs other than Level 1 inputs, which are observable either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — unobservable inputs.
Level 3 assumptions are, by their nature, inherently uncertain and the effect of changes in estimates may result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.

12

Table of Contents

Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Derivative Liability
The Series B Preferred shares are required to be measured at fair value each reporting period. The fair value of the Series B Preferred shares was estimated using an option-pricing model that requires Level 3 inputs, which are highly subjective and determined using the following significant assumptions as of:
November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Stock price$1.52 $2.59$0.64 $1.93
Conversion price$1.75 $1.75$1.75 $1.75
Expected volatility76% 72%68% 76%
Expected term (in years)7.1 8.16.4 7.4
Risk free interest rate2.05% 2.34%1.83% 2.16%
Expected dividends$— $—$— $—
The following table presents the activity recorded for the derivative liability during the first three quartershalf ended:
 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013
 (In thousands)
Beginning balance$30,720
 $20,082
(Gain) loss on change in fair value(1,225) 9,290
Balance at end of first quarter29,495

29,372
(Gain) loss on change in fair value(10,434)
21,154
Balance at end of second quarter19,061
 50,526
(Gain) loss on change in fair value(4,881) (23,444)
Ending balance$14,180
 $27,082
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
 (In thousands)
Beginning balance$28,448
 $30,720
Gain on change in fair value(9,081) (1,225)
Balance at end of first quarter$19,367

$29,495
Gain on change in fair value(15,717)
(10,434)
Balance at end of second quarter$3,650
 $19,061
Changes in the fair value of the derivative liability are included in (gain) lossgain on derivative liability in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Operations.
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
On a non-recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model, the Company measures certain of its store-level long-lived assets at fair value based on Level 3 inputs including, but not limited to, comparable store sales and margin growth, projected operating costs based primarily on historical trends, and an estimated weighted-average cost of capital rate. During each of the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 and 20132014 the Company recorded 2.0$0.6 million and $1.7 million of impairment charges, respectively, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Operations. In addition, during the third quarter of 2014, the Company determined that certain software previously capitalized for internal use was abandoned. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.1 million and accrued approximately $0.4 million related to future software maintenance costs.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
Charles Pfeiffer, individually and on behalf of other aggrieved employees vs. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, Case No. 1100527. On January 13, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a lawsuit against the Company under California’s private attorney general act alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company has filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the plaintiff’s claims and asserting various defenses. The Company is currently in the discovery phase of this case. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been accrued by the Company as of the date of this report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in the future which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.
Tamara Beeney, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated vs. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corporation, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2011-00459346-CU-OE-CXC. On March 18, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks class certification, the appointment of the plaintiff as class representative, and an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company has filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the plaintiff’s claims and asserting various defenses. On February 21, 2014, the plaintiff filed her motion to certify a class with respect to several claims. The Company’s opposition to such motion was filed on June 30, 2014 and the plaintiff's reply to such opposition was filed on November

13

Table of Contents

4, 2014. The hearing on the plaintiff’s motion will now be held on February 2,November 24, 2015. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been accrued by the Company as of the date of this report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in the future which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

13

Table of Contents

The Company is also involved from time to time in other litigation incidental to its business. The Company currently cannot assess whether the outcome of current litigation will likely have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, the Company may make provisions for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.
Indemnities, Commitments and Guarantees
During the normal course of business, the Company agreed to certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These indemnities, commitments and guarantees include those given to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease and indemnities to directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of California. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets other than as disclosed below.
Letters of Credit
The Company has issued guarantees in the form of commercial letters of credit, of which there were approximately $9$8 million and $10$7 million outstanding at NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 and February 1, 2014,January 31, 2015, respectively, as security for merchandise shipments from overseas. All in-transit merchandise covered by letters of credit is accrued for in accounts payable.
Minimum Royalties
The Company has licensing arrangements under which the Company sells certain branded apparel and pays the licensor royalties. The contractually obligated minimum guaranteed royalty payments were approximately $6 million at both August 1, 2015 and January 31, 2015.
12. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates exclusively in the retail apparel industry. The Company designs, produces and distributes clothing and related products catering to teens and young adults primarily through its mall-based PacSun retail stores. The Company has identified threetwo operating segments: PacSun stores PacSun Outlet stores and pacsun.com.www.pacsun.com. The threetwo operating segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment based on the similar nature of products sold, production, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target customers, and economic characteristics among the threetwo operating segments.
13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In accordance with ASC Topic 205, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Discontinued Operations”, the Company has presented the results of operations of its closed stores as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company closed one and three under-performing stores in the third quarters of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, and three and thirteen under-performing stores in the first three quarters of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. If the cash flow of the closed store was determined not to be significant to ongoing operations, and the cash inflows of nearby stores were not expected to increase significantly, the results of operations of the closed store are included in discontinued operations. The following table details the operating results included in discontinued operations for the periods presented:
 For the Third Quarter Ended For the Three Quarters Ended
 (In thousands)
 November 2, 2013 November 2, 2013
Net sales$3,783
 $12,460
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs3,210
 9,880
Gross margin573
 2,580
Selling, general and administrative expenses1,019
 3,778
Operating loss(446) (1,198)
Income tax expense27
 43
Loss from discontinued operations$(473) $(1,241)

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.OPERATIONS
The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. In Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014January 31, 2015 (our “2013“2014 Annual Report”), we provide cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained herein. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often, but not always, identifiable by the use of words or phrases such as “will result,” “expects to,” “will continue,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimated,” “projects” and “outlook”) are not historical facts and may be forward-looking and, accordingly, such statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this Report include, but are not limited to, the following categories of expectations about:
the sufficiency of operating cash flows, working capital and available credit to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements;
our capital expenditure plans for the remainder of fiscal 2014;2015; and
potential recording of non-cash impairment charges for under-performing stores in future quarters.
All forward-looking statements included in this Report are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our 20132014 Annual Report, which are hereby incorporated by reference in this Report for a discussion of these risks and uncertainties. We assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after such statements are made.
Executive Overview
We consider the following items to be key indicators in evaluating our performance:
Comparable (or “same store”) sales
Stores are deemed comparable stores on the first day of the fiscal month following the one-year anniversary of their opening or expansion/relocation. We consider same store sales to be an important indicator of current Company performance. Closed stores or stores that experience closure during a relocation or remodel are removed from the store base for that period and for the same period in comparable periods. We include sales from our e-commerce business in same store sales. Same store sales results are important in achieving operating leverage of certain expenses such as store payroll, store occupancy, depreciation, general and administrative expenses and other costs that are somewhat fixed. Positive same store sales results usually generate greater operating leverage of expenses while negative same store sales results generally have a negative impact on operating leverage. Same store sales results also have a direct impact on our net sales, cash and working capital.
Net merchandise margin
We analyze the components of net merchandise margins, specifically initial markups, discounts and markdowns as a percentage of net sales. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in our use of discounts or markdowns could have an adverse impact on our gross margin results and results of operations.
Operating margin
We view operating margin as a key indicator of our success. The key drivers of operating margins are comparable store net sales, net merchandise margins, and our ability to control operating expenses. For a discussion of the changes in the components comprising operating margins, see “Results of Operations” in this section.
Store sales trends
We evaluate store sales trends in assessing the operational performance of our stores. Important store sales trends include average net sales per store, average net sales per square foot and number of transactions.

15

Table of Contents

Cash flow and liquidity (working capital)
We evaluate cash flow from operations, liquidity and working capital to determine our short-term operational financing needs. As of August 1, 2015, there was $5 million outstanding on the Wells Credit Facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we borrowed an additional $10 million on the Wells Credit Facility primarily to fund inventory purchases for the peak back-to-school selling season, and subsequently repaid $10 million. We are not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the Wells Credit Facility.
Although we made progress with respect to our comparable store net sales and gross margins during fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014, we experienced declines in comparable store sales and gross margins in the first half of fiscal 2015. If we were to continue to experience a decline in same-store sales and gross margins in the future, we may be required to access most, if not all, of the Wells Credit Facility and would potentially require other sources of financing to fund our operations, which sources might not be available. Based on current forecasts, we believe that our cash flows from operations and working capital, along with the availability under the Wells Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months. Consistent withThe Wells Credit Facility and Term Loan are each scheduled to mature on December 7, 2016. Management is considering various approaches to refinancing this indebtedness, which could include the sales and leasebacks of our previous expectations,corporate headquarters in Anaheim, California and distribution center in Olathe, Kansas. Such transactions would require the fourth quarterconsent of fiscal 2014 we borrowed $15 million on our mortgage holder (ANICO), as well as Wells Fargo Credit Facility to finance inventory purchases for the holiday season. We expect to repayand an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital, and there can be no assurance that such borrowings prior to the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.consents would be obtained or that such transactions would be consummated.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 20132014 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014.January 31, 2015.
Results of Operations
Continuing Operations
The following table sets forth selected income statement data from our continuing operations expressed as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal periods indicated. The table excludes discontinued operations and the discussion that follows should be read in conjunction with the table:

For the Third Quarter Ended For the Three Quarters EndedFor the Second Quarter Ended For the First Half Ended
November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Net sales100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs73.3
 74.8
 72.6
 73.1
74.2
 70.9
 73.7
 72.3
Gross margin26.7
 25.2
 27.4
 26.9
25.8
 29.1
 26.3
 27.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses27.3
 26.1
 28.7
 28.1
27.5
 28.6
 29.3
 29.4
Operating loss(0.6) (0.9) (1.3) (1.2)
(Gain) loss on derivative liability(2.3) (11.6) (2.8) 1.2
Operating income (loss)(1.7) 0.5
 (3.0) (1.7)
Gain on derivative liability(8.0) (4.9) (6.8) (3.0)
Interest expense, net1.9
 1.8
 2.0
 1.8
2.2
 1.9
 2.3
 2.0
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes(0.2) 8.9
 (0.5) (4.2)
Income tax expense
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
(Loss) income from continuing operations(0.2)% 8.7 % (0.6)% (4.3)%
Income (loss) before income taxes4.1
 3.5
 1.5
 (0.7)
Income tax (benefit) expense(0.2) 
 0.2
 0.1
Net income (loss)4.3 % 3.5 % 1.3 % (0.8)%
The second quarter (13 weeks) ended August 1, 2015 as compared to the second quarter (13 weeks) ended August 2, 2014
Net Sales
Net sales were $195.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 versus $211.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The components of this $16.1 million decrease in net sales are as follows:
$ millionsAttributable to
$(12.8)Decrease in comparable store sales.
(3.3)Decrease in non-comparable sales.
$(16.1)Total
For the second quarter of fiscal 2015, comparable store net sales decreased 6%, average sales transactions increased 8% and total transactions decreased 13%, as compared to the same period a year ago. E-commerce net sales increased 2% for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of e-commerce net sales, comparable retail store net sales for the

16

Table of Contents

The third quarter (13 weeks) ended November 1, 2014 as compared to the third quarter (13 weeks) ended November 2, 2013
Net Sales
Net sales were $212.3 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2014 versus $202.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2013. The components of this $9.5 million increase in net sales are as follows:
$ millionsAttributable to
$7.1
Increase in comparable store sales.
2.4
Increase in non-comparable sales.
$9.5
Total
For the third quarter of fiscal 2014, comparable store net sales increased 4%, average sales transactions increased 9% and total transactions2015 decreased 5%, as7% compared to the same period a year ago.fiscal 2014. The comparable store net sales increasedecrease resulted from a 6% increasean 8% decrease in Men’s sales whileand a 4% decrease in Women’s sales were flat.sales. The increasedecrease in Men’s sales was drivendue primarily byto declines in tops, bottoms, swimwear and accessories. The decrease in Women's sales of bottoms,was due primarily to declines in footwear and tops. Women's sales of tops increased, offset by a decrease in non-apparel.accessories. Apparel represented 82%81% of total Men’s sales for both the third quartersecond quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014, versus 83% in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, while Women’s apparel represented 89%93% of total Women's sales for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 versus 87%91% in the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. Combined accessories and footwear was 15%were 13% of total sales for each of the third quarterssecond quarter of fiscal 2014 and 2013.2015 versus 14% for the second quarter of fiscal 2014.
Gross Margin
Gross margin, after buying, distribution and occupancy costs, was $56.7$50.5 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 versus $51.2$61.5 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin was 26.7%25.8% for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 compared to 25.2%29.1% for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. The components of this 1.5% increase3.3% decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
%Attributable to
(1.1
)
IncreaseDecrease in merchandise margin to 49.8%51.2% from 48.7%52.3%.
0.5(1.8
)
DecreaseIncrease in occupancy costs.costs as a percentage of net sales.
(0.10.4)Increase in buying, distribution and distributionshipping costs.
1.5(3.3
)
Total
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $58.0$53.9 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 compared to $53.0$60.6 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. As a percentage of net sales, these expenses increaseddecreased to 27.3%27.5% in the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 from 26.1%28.6% in the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. The components of this 1.2% increase1.1% decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
%Attributable to
0.71.0
Incurrence of consulting costs supporting long-term strategies, partially offset by a decreaseIncrease in store payroll and payroll-related expenses and lower store impairment charges.payroll related costs.
0.5(2.1
)
One-time software impairment charge, partially offset by a decreaseDecrease in depreciation, consulting and amortization.other costs.
1.2(1.1
)
Total
We assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets (or asset group) may not be recoverable. Based on management’s review of the historical operating performance, including sales trends, gross margin rates, current cash flows from operations and the projected outlook for each of our stores, we determined that certain stores would not be able to generate sufficient cash flows over the remaining term of the related leases to recover our investment in the respective stores. As a result, we recorded non-cash impairment charges from continuing operations of approximately $0.4$0.1 million and $0.6$0.9 million during the thirdsecond quarters of fiscal 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, to write-down the carrying value of certain long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values. In addition, during the third quarter of 2014 it was determined that certain software licenses were abandoned, and as a result, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million and accrued approximately $0.4 million related to future maintenance costs.

17

Table of Contents

Gain on Derivative Liability
We recorded a non-cash gain of approximately $5$15.7 million related to our derivative liability in the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2014,2015, compared to a non-cash gain of approximately $23$10.4 million for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Fair Value Measurements – Measurements–Recurring Fair Value Measurements-Derivative Liability” for further discussion of the derivative liability.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, was approximately $4$4.3 million in each of the third quarterssecond quarter of fiscal 2014 and 2013.2015 compared to $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2014. Interest expense, net, for the thirdsecond quarters of fiscal 20142015 and 20132014 was primarily related to interest costs associated with the Term Loan and mortgage debt described in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
We recognized an income tax expensebenefit of $0.1$0.3 million and $0.4$0.2 million for the thirdsecond quarters of fiscal 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. For fiscal 2014,2015, we expect to continue to maintain a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets resulting in minimal income tax expense for the year. Information regarding the realizability of our deferred tax assets and our assessment of a need for a valuation allowance is contained in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Loss)
17

Table of Contents

Net Income from Continuing Operations
Our loss from continuing operationsnet income for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 was approximately $0.5$8.3 million, or $0.01$0.12 per diluted share, versus net income from continuing operations of approximately $17.7$7.5 million, or $0.24$0.10 per diluted share, for the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2013.2014. Included in the loss from continuing operations net incomefor the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 20142015 was a non-cash gain of approximately $5$15.7 million, or $0.07$0.22 per diluted share related to our derivative liability, versus a non-cash gain of approximately $23$10.4 million, or $(0.31)$0.14 per diluted share, for the same period a year ago.
The first three quarters (39half (26 weeks) ended NovemberAugust 1, 20142015 as compared to the first three quarters (39half (26 weeks) ended NovemberAugust 2, 20132014
Net Sales
Net sales were $595.2$362.1 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 versus $579.2$382.9 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. The components of this $16.0$20.8 million increasedecrease in net sales are as follows:
$ millions$ millionsAttributable to$ millionsAttributable to
$11.7
Increase in comparable store sales.(16.2)Decrease in comparable store sales.
4.3
Increase in non-comparable sales.
(4.6(4.6)Decrease in non-comparable sales.
$16.0
Total(20.8)Total
For the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014,2015, comparable store net sales increased 2%decreased 4%, average sales transactions increased 7%10% and total transactions decreased 5%13%, as compared to the same period a year ago. E-commerce net sales remained flat the first half of fiscal 2015 compared to the first half of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of e-commerce net sales, comparable retail store net sales for the first half of fiscal 2015 decreased 5% compared to the first half of fiscal 2014. The comparable store net sales increase was due todecrease resulted from a 6% increasedecrease in Men’s sales whileand a 3% decrease in Women’s sales decreased 2%.sales. The increasedecrease in Men’s sales was driven by sales ofdue primarily to declines in tops, bottoms, swimwear and footwear.accessories. The declinedecrease in Women’sWomen's sales was due primarily due to a decreasedeclines in sales of non-apparel.footwear and accessories. Apparel represented 81% of total Men’s sales for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 versus 82%80% in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013,2014, while Women’s apparel represented 91%93% of total Women's sales for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 versus 87%91% in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. Combined accessories and footwear was 15%were 14% of total sales for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 versus 16% in15% for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014.
Gross Margin
Gross margin, after buying, distribution and occupancy costs, was $162.9$95.1 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 versus $155.5$106.2 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin 27.4%was 26.3% for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 compared to 26.9%27.7% for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. The components of this 0.5% increase1.4% decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales waswere as follows:
%Attributable to
0.5(1.3
)
Increase in merchandise margin to 52.0% from 51.5%.occupancy costs as a percentage of net sales.
(0.1
)
Increase in buying and occupancy costs, offset by reductions in freight and otherdistribution costs.
0.5(1.4
)
Total
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

18

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $170.6$106.0 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 compared to $162.4$112.6 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. As a percentage of net sales, these expenses increaseddecreased to 28.7%29.3% in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 from 28.1%29.4% in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. The components of this 0.6% increase0.1% decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
%Attributable to
0.71.2
Incurrence of consulting costs supporting long-term strategies, partially offset by a decreaseIncrease in store payroll and payroll-related expenses.payroll related costs as a percentage of net sales.
(1.3)Decrease in depreciation, consulting and other costs.
(0.1)One-time software impairment charge offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization.
0.6
Total
We assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets (or asset group) may not be recoverable. Based on management’s review of the historical operating performance, including sales trends, gross margin rates, current cash flows from operations and the projected outlook for each of our stores, we determined that certain stores would not be able to generate sufficient cash flows over the remaining term of the related leases to recover our investment in the respective stores. As a result, we recorded non-cash impairment charges from continuing operations of approximately $2.0$0.6 million and $1.7 million during the first three quartershalves of fiscal 2015 and 2014, and approximately $2.0 million during the first three quarters of fiscal 2013respectively, to write-down the carrying value of certain long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values. In addition, during the third quarter

18

Table of 2014 it was determined that certain software licenses were abandoned, and as a result, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million and accrued approximately $0.4 million related to future maintenance costs.Contents

Gain on Derivative Liability
We recorded a non-cash gain of approximately $17$24.8 million related to our derivative liability in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014,2015, compared to a non-cash lossgain of approximately $7$11.7 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Fair Value Measurements – Measurements–Recurring Fair Value Measurements-Derivative Liability” for further discussion of the derivative liability.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, was approximately $12$8.4 million and $11 million forin the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015 compared to $8.0 million in the first half of 2014. Interest expense, net, for the first three quartershalves of fiscal 20142015 and 20132014 was primarily related to interest costs associated with the Term Loan and mortgage debt described in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
We recognized income tax expense of $0.4$0.7 million and $0.5$0.2 million for the first three quartershalves of fiscal 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. For fiscal 2014,2015, we expect to continue to maintain a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets resulting in minimal income tax expense for the year. Information regarding the realizability of our deferred tax assets and our assessment of a need for a valuation allowance is contained in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loss from Continuing OperationsNet Income (Loss)
Our loss from continuing operationsnet income for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 was approximately $3$4.8 million, or $(0.05)$0.07 per diluted share, versus a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $25$2.9 million, or $(0.36)$0.04 per diluted share, for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. Included in the loss from continuing operations net incomefor the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 was a non-cash gain of approximately $17$24.8 million, or $0.24$0.35 per diluted share related to our derivative liability, versus a non-cash lossgain of $7.0$11.7 million, or $(0.10)$0.17 per diluted share, for the same period a year ago.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed our operations primarily from internally generated cash flow and with short-term and long-term borrowings. Our primary cash requirements have been for the financing of inventories and construction of newly opened, remodeled, expanded or relocated stores. As of August 1, 2015, there was $5 million outstanding on the Wells Credit Facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we borrowed an additional $10 million on the Wells Credit Facility primarily to fund inventory purchases for the peak back-to-school selling season, and subsequently repaid $10 million. We are not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the Wells Credit Facility.
Although we made progress with respect to our comparable store net sales and gross margins during fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014, we experienced declines in comparable store sales and gross margins in the first half of fiscal 2015. If we were to continue to experience a decline in same-store sales and gross margins in the future, we may be required to access most, if not all, of the Wells Credit Facility and would potentially require other sources of financing to fund our operations, which sources might not be available. Based on current forecasts, we believe that our cash flows from operations and working capital, along with the availability under the Wells Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months. Consistent withThe Wells Credit Facility and Term Loan are each scheduled to mature on December 7, 2016. Management is considering various approaches to refinancing this indebtedness, which could include the sales and leasebacks of our previous expectations,corporate headquarters in Anaheim, California and distribution center in Olathe, Kansas. Such transactions would require the consent of our mortgage holder (ANICO), as well as Wells Fargo and an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital, and there can be no assurance that such consents would be obtained or that such transactions would be consummated.
 For the First Half Ended
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
 (In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(6,093) $1,105
Net cash used in investing activities(6,762) (7,919)
Net cash provided by financing activities3,964
 360
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(8,891) $(6,454)
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities in the fourth quarterfirst half of fiscal 2014 we borrowed $152015 was $6.1 million, oncompared to $1.1 million of cash provided by operating activities the first half of fiscal 2014. This decrease of $7.2 million was due primarily to the gain in our Wells Fargo Credit Facilityderivative liability, which was $24.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2015, compared to finance inventory purchases$11.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2014. This gain also contributed to our net income of $4.8 million for the holiday season. We expectfirst half of 2015, compared to repay such borrowings prior toa net loss of $2.9 million for the end of the fourth quarterfirst half of fiscal 2014. Other non-cash adjustments to reconcile our net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

19

Table of Contents

 For the Three Quarters Ended
 November 1, 2014 November 2, 2013
 (In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(4,280) $(21,110)
Net cash used in investing activities(11,320) (7,160)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities110
 (536)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(15,490) $(28,806)
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash used for operating activitieswere primarily related to depreciation and amortization expense in the first three quarters of fiscal 2014 was $4.3 million, compared to $21.1 million of cash used for the first three quarters of fiscal 2013. This decrease of $16.8 million was due primarily to increases in accounts payable and other current liabilities.both periods. Our primary use of cash in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 and 20132014 was to purchase merchandise inventories. Non-cash adjustments to reconcile our net loss to net cash used in operating activities were approximately $8 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2014 and approximately $32 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2013, and were primarily related to depreciation expense, asset impairment charges and the (gain) loss on our derivative liability in both periods.
Working Capital
Working capital at NovemberAugust 1, 2014,2015 was approximately $23$17.3 million, compared to approximately $16$7.5 million at February 1, 2014,January 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $7$9.8 million. The changes in working capital were as follows:
  
$ millionsDescription
$16
Working capital at February 1, 2014.
(15)Decrease in cash and cash equivalents.
11
Increase in inventories, net of accounts payable.
17
Decrease in derivative liability.
(6)Decrease in other current assets, net of other current liabilities.
$23
Working capital at November 1, 2014.
  
$ millionsDescription
$7.5
Working capital at January 31, 2015
(8.9)Decrease in cash and cash equivalents.
(7.3)Decrease in inventories, net of accounts payable.
24.8
Decrease in derivative liability.
1.2
Increase in other current assets, net of other current liabilities.
$17.3
Working capital at August 1, 2015

Investing Cash Flows
Net cash used in investing activities in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 was $11.3$6.8 million, compared to $7.2$7.9 million used in investing activities for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013, an increase2014, a decrease in cash outflow of $4.1$1.1 million. Investing cash outflows in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 and 2013 were primarily comprised of capital expenditures for refreshing existing stores and information technology investments at the store level.investments. We expect total capital expenditures for fiscal 20142015 to be approximately $16 million to $18$15 million.
Financing Cash Flows
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities in the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 was $0.1$4.0 million, compared to net cash used inprovided by financing activities of $0.5$0.4 million for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2013.2014. The primary uses of cash for financing activities in the first three quartershalves of fiscal 20142015 and 20132014 were principal payments under our mortgage debt and capital lease obligations. The primary sourceobligations, as well as required statutory tax withholding payments associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards for certain executive officers. These uses of cash were partially offset by proceeds from financing activitiesstock option exercises during both periods. In addition, during the first half of fiscal 2015, we borrowed $15.0 million on our line of credit, and subsequently repaid $10.0 million of these borrowings. These borrowings were primarily for the first three quarterspurpose of fiscal 2014 was net proceeds fromfinancing inventory purchases in advance of the refinancing of our mortgage debt.peak back-to-school selling season.
Wells Credit Facility
Information regarding the Wells Credit Facility is contained in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.
Term Loan
Information regarding the Term Loan is contained in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.
Mortgage Transactions
Information regarding our mortgage debt is contained in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

20

Table of Contents


Contractual Obligations
We have minimum annual rental commitments under existing store leases as well as a minor amount of capital leases for computer equipment.information technology assets. We lease all of our retail store locations under operating leases. We lease equipment, from time to time, under both capital and operating leases. In addition, at any time we are contingently liable for commercial letters of credit with foreign suppliers of merchandise. At NovemberAugust 1, 20142015, our future financial commitments under all existing contractual obligations were as follows:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
Total 
Less
than 1
year
 
1-3
years
 
3-5
years
 
More
than 5
years
Total 
Less
than 1
year
 
1-3
years
 
3-5
years
 
More
than 5
years
(In millions)(In millions)
Operating lease obligations$304
 $72
 $108
 $70
 $54
$357
 $76
 $127
 $79
 $75
Term loan96
 4
 92
 
 
92
 4
 88
 
 
Mortgage debt37
 2
 4
 4
 27
36
 2
 4
 4
 26
Letters of credit9
 9
 
 
 
8
 8
 
 
 
Guaranteed minimum royalties5
 1
 2
 1
 1
6
 2
 3
 1
 
Capital lease obligations1
 1
 
 
 
1
 1
 
 
 
Total$452
 $89
 $206
 $75
 $82
$500
 $93
 $222
 $84
 $101
Operating lease obligations consist primarily of future minimum lease commitments related to store operating leases. The contractual obligations table above does not include common area maintenance (“CAM”) charges, insurance, or tax obligations, which are also required contractual obligations under our store operating leases. In many of our leases, CAM charges are not fixed and can fluctuate significantly from year to year for any particular store. Total store rental expenses, including CAM, for the first three quartershalf of fiscal 20142015 and fiscal 20132014 were approximately $103$69.5 million and $102$68.6 million, respectively. Total CAM expenses could fluctuate from year-to-year as long-term leases come up for renewal at current market rates in excess of original lease terms and as we continue to close stores. Additional information regarding operating leases can be found below under the caption “Operating Leases.”

Obligations under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are equal to approximately $2were $1.9 million as of NovemberAugust 1, 2014,2015, and have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above as we are unable to reasonably determine the amount or the timing of the future payments.
Operating Leases
We lease our retail stores and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through August 2025.January 2026. Many of our retail store leases require us to pay CAM charges, insurance and property taxes. In addition, many of our retail store leases require us to pay percentage rent ranging from 2% to 20% when sales volumes exceed certain minimum sales levels. The initial terms of such leases are typically 8 to 10 years, some of which contain renewal options exercisable at our discretion. Most leases also contain rent escalation clauses that come into effect at various times throughout the lease term. Rent expense is recorded under the straight-line method over the life of the lease (see “Straight-Line Rent” in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 20132014 Annual Report). Other rent escalation clauses can take effect based on changes in primary mall tenants throughout the term of a given lease. Many leases also contain cancellation or kick-out clauses in our favor that relieve us of any future obligation under a lease if specified criteria are met. These cancellation provisions typically apply if annual store sales levels do not exceed $1 million or mall occupancy targets are not achieved within the first 36 months of the lease. Generally, we are not required to make payments to our landlords in order to exercise our cancellation rights under these provisions. The Wells Credit Facility and Term Loan do not preclude the transfer or disposal of assets related to the stores we are projecting to close by the end of fiscal 2014.2015. None of our retail store leases contain purchase options.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of such agreements, services to be provided by us, or intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers that will require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers in certain circumstances.

21

Table of Contents

It is not possible to determine our maximum potential liability under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification

21

Table of Contents

agreements may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to us.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is contained in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations in the recent past, including the first three quartershalf of fiscal 2014.2015.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results
Our business is seasonal by nature. Our first quarter historically accounts for the smallest percentage of annual net sales with each successive quarter contributing a greater percentage than the last. In recent years, approximately 45% of our net sales have occurred in the first half of the fiscal year and 55% have occurred in the second half. The six to seven week selling periods for each of the back-to-school and holiday seasons together account for approximately 35% to 40% of our annual net sales and a higher percentage of our operating results on a combined basis. Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including changes in consumer buying patterns, fashion trends, the timing and level of markdowns, the timing of store closings, expansions and relocations, competitive factors, and general economic conditions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk in connection with the Wells Credit Facility. Generally, direct borrowings under the Wells Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate (as defined in the Wells Credit Facility, 1.91%1.94% as of NovemberAugust 1, 2014)2015) which, at the Company’s option, may be determined by reference to a LIBOR Rate or a Base Rate).Rate. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 20132014 Annual Report.
A sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to the Wells Credit Facility to determine the impact of unfavorable changes in interest rates on our cash flows. The sensitivity analysis quantified that the estimated potential cash flow impact would be less than $10,000 in additional interest expense (for each $1 million borrowed) if interest rates were to increase by 10% from their current rates over a three-month period. Actual interest charges incurred may differ from those estimated because of changes or differences in market rates, differences in amounts borrowed, timing and other factors.
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. The derivative liability associated with the Series B Preferred is recorded at fair value using an options pricing model which is dependent on the market price of our common stock. Changes in the value of the derivative are included as a component of earnings in current operations. A sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to the Series B Preferred to determine the impact of fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. The sensitivity analysis determined that the impact of a market price fluctuation of 10% would change the fair value of the derivative liability by approximately $2$0.5 million. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our derivative liability and valuation thereof.

22

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on

22


this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of NovemberAugust 1, 20142015.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information on legal proceedings see “Litigation” within Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We have included in Part I, Item 1A of our 20132014 Annual Report descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). WeOther than the Risk Factors below, we believe there are no material changes from the disclosure provided in our 20132014 Annual Report with respect to the Risk Factors, other than those disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2014.Factors. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock.
We are not currently in compliance with the NASDAQ Global Select Market $1.00 minimum bid price requirement. If our common stock is delisted, the market price and liquidity of our common stock and our ability to raise additional capital would be adversely impacted.
Our common stock is currently listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). Continued listing of a security on NASDAQ is conditioned upon compliance with various continued listing standards. On September 1, 2015, we received a letter from NASDAQ (the “Notice”) notifying us that the closing bid price of our common stock was below the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement for 30 consecutive business days and, as a result, we no longer comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on NASDAQ. The Notice also stated that we have been provided an initial cure period of 180 calendar days, or until February 29, 2016, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. To regain compliance, the closing bid price of our common stock must be at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days prior to February 29, 2016. If we do not regain compliance by February 29, 2016, we may be eligible for additional time. To qualify, we will be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement, and will need to provide written notice of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second cure period by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary. If we need the second cure period, we intend to effect a reverse stock split, if necessary, during such period and would seek shareholder approval for the reverse stock split at our annual meeting of shareholders in June 2016. As part of its review process, NASDAQ will make a determination of whether it believes that we will be able to cure this deficiency. Should NASDAQ conclude that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, NASDAQ will provide notice that our securities will be subject to delisting. Our failure to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement under the NASDAQ listing rules may result in the delisting of our common stock.
If our common stock were to be delisted from NASDAQ, trading of our common stock most likely would be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading would likely reduce the market liquidity of our common stock. As a result, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock. If our common stock is delisted from NASDAQ and the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might also become subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock defined as a “penny stock” (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of stockholders to borrow against or “margin” low-priced stocks, and declines in the stock price below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. Additionally, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher priced stocks, the current price of the common stock can result in an individual shareholder paying

23


transaction costs that represent a higher percentage of total share value than would be the case if our share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of institutions to purchase our common stock. Finally, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock. As a result, the ability of our stockholders to resell their shares of common stock, and the price at which they could sell their shares, could be adversely affected. The delisting of our stock from NASDAQ would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.
If recent declines in our comparable store net sales and gross margins continue, they could have a material adverse impact on our business, profitability and liquidity.
Although we made progress with respect to our comparable store net sales and gross margins during fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014, we experienced declines in comparable store sales and gross margins in the first half of fiscal 2015. If we were to continue to experience a decline in same-store sales and gross margins in the future, we may be required to access most, if not all, of the Wells Credit Facility and would potentially require other sources of financing to fund our operations, which sources might not be available. Based on current forecasts, we believe that our cash flows from operations and working capital, along with the availability under the Wells Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months. The Wells Credit Facility and Term Loan are each scheduled to mature on December 7, 2016. Management is considering various approaches to refinancing this indebtedness, which could include the sales and leasebacks of our corporate headquarters in Anaheim, California and distribution center in Olathe, Kansas. Such transactions would require the consent of our mortgage holder (ANICO), as well as Wells Fargo and an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital, and there can be no assurance that such consents would be obtained or that such transactions would be consummated.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.

23


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index.

24


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: September 10, 2015By:/s/ GARY H. SCHOENFELD
Gary H. Schoenfeld
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: September 10, 2015By:/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. TEDFORD
Christopher R. Tedford
Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


25


EXHIBIT INDEX
  
Incorporated by
Reference
Exhibit #Exhibit DescriptionForm Filing Date
3.1Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company10-Q 8/31/2004
3.2
Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company

8-K 12/24/1998
3.3
Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company

10-Q 9/6/2013
3.4
Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Convertible Series B Preferred Stock of the Company.Company

8-K 12/7/2011
10.1Modification Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, between Miraloma and American National Insurance Company
8-K

7/7/2014
10.2Modification of Note, Mortgage and Other Agreements, dated as of July 1, 2014, between PacSun Stores and American National Insurance Company8-K7/7/2014
31.1+Certification of Gary H. Schoenfeld pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
31.2+
Certification of Michael W. KaplanChristopher R. Tedford pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   
32.1+Certifications of Gary H. Schoenfeld and Michael W. KaplanChristopher R. Tedford pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document   
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document   
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document   
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document   
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document   
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document   
 
+Filed herewith
**These interactive files are deemed not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are otherwise not subject to liability under these sections.

24


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: December 4, 2014By:/s/ GARY H. SCHOENFELD
Gary H. Schoenfeld
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: December 4, 2014By:/s/ MICHAEL W. KAPLAN
Michael W. Kaplan
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

2526